Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 03-01-2005-9aORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: March 1, 2005 Action Agenda Item No. -q SUBJECT: Schools Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (SAPFO) -Approval of Annual Certifications DEPARTMENT: Manager/Planning/Budget PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) No ATTACHMENT(S): Draft SAPFOTAC Annual Report (under separate cover) INFORMATION CONTACT: Rod Visser, ext 2308 Craig Benedict, ext 2592 Donna Dean, ext 2151 TELEPHONE NUMBERS: Hillsborough 732-8181 Chapel Hill 968-4501 Durham 688-7331 Mebane 336-227-2031 PURPOSE: To review the Annual Report from the Schools Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance Technical Advisory Committee (SAPFOTAG). BACKGROUND: At the December 14, 2004 Board of County Commissioners meeting, the Board approved the November 15, 2004 actual membership and previously adopted capacity numbers and received the 10-year student membership projections for both Orange County Schools (OCS) and Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools (CHCCS). There was a total increase from the previous year of 163 students in OCS and 43 students in CHCCS. The SAPFOTAC, comprised of representatives of both school systems and the Planning Directors of the County and Towns, is tasked to produce an annual report for the governing boards of each SAPFO partner. The annual report outlines changes in actual membership, capacity, student projections, and their collective impacts on the future issuance of Certificates of Adequate Public Schools (CAPS). Orange County's Planning Staff compiles the report, holds a meeting discussion about various aspects, and then prepares a draft report that is reviewed by the SAPFO Technical Advisory Committee. A draft of the 2005 SAPFOTAC Report has been completed, reviewed by the SAPFOTAC members, and is provided under separate cover for review by the BOCC. As was discussed in the agenda materials far, and during the presentation at, the December 14, 2004 Orange County Commissioners' meeting, there is not consensus among all SAPFO partners about how to deal with legislative changes during the past two years by the State of North Carolina that have led to reductions in maximum class size in kindergarten through 3'd grade. The General Assembly has enacted statutory changes that provide that K-3 class size should be reduced from a ratio of 23 students to 1 teacher to 21 students to 1 teacher. County Commissioners have noted that a unilateral reduction in class size by the State has the effect of creating an unfunded mandate for county governments. Reduced class sizes in elementary schools create the need for more classroom space, which county governments must pay for. The County has determined that for capital planning purposes for the 2005-15 Capital Investment Plan (CIP) cycle, it will continue to consider elementary school building capacities based on the previous jointly established student-to-teacher ratios. Therefore, the building capacity calculations for both school systems for 2004-05 are unchanged from those used for 2003-04. Membership/capacity analysis and capacity input into the GAPS system are based on the adopted 23:1 student/teacher ratio for grades K-3. Nevertheless, for reference purposes and in recognition of the need for further discussions to reach resolution among the SAPFO partners in the near future about how to address the school building capacity implications of State-mandated smaller class sizes, the SAPFOTAC report does present tables for capacity calculations that reflect both the 23:1 and 21:1 student/teacher ratios in grades K through 3. OGS elementary membership and capacity are reflected on pages 1 of 4 and 2 of 4 of Attachment LB.S (pages 13 and14 of the draft SAPFOTAC report). CHCGS elementary membership and capacity are reflected on pages 1 of 4 and 2 of 4 of Attachment I.B,6 (pages 17 and 18 of the draft SAPFOTAG report). The Memoranda of Understanding with both school districts require that any changes to building capacity calculations "be determined by a joint action of the School Board and the Orange County Board of Commissioners." Therefore, a joint action committee comprised of representatives of these three governing boards will need to convene to discuss any potential changes to the adopted 23:1 student/teacher ratio for grades K-3. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Precise financial impacts cannot be determined, but possible changes in projected building capacity and projected growth in student membership for the next ten years will have impacts on future operating and capital budgets measured in the tens of millions of dollars. RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Board: 1) review the 2005 SAPFOTAC Annual Report; 2) provide appropriate direction to the Manager and staff; and 3) consider convening discussions among representatives of all three governing boards that would constitute a Joint Action Committee to address the school building capacity implications associated with State-mandated elementary class size reductions.