The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutOUTBoard agenda 052213AGENDA Orange Unified Transportation Board May 22, 2013 7:00p.m. You can bring your laptops/tablets if you would like to use them. Conference Room 004 (LowerFloor) Orange County West Campus 131 West Margaret Lane, Hillsborough Time Item Page Title 7:001.Call to Order and Roll Call 7:05 7:08 2. 3. 3-6 Approval of Minutes Minutes from April 17, 2013 Consideration of Additions to the Agenda 7:10 7:45 8: 25 8:45 4. 5. 6. 7-16 17-52 53-56 Regular Agenda a. Review of St. Mary’s Road as a regional bicycle route – A segment of St. Mary’s Road between US 70 Bypass and the Durham County line was identified as a Regional Bicycle Facility on the Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro MPO draft Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) On-Road Bicycle Facilities Map. The Planning staff asked that this designation be removed in favor of a preferred alternative consistent with Orange County’s approved bicycle routes. The DCHC TAC opted to: “Maintain St. Mary’s Road as a regional bicycle route in the MTP for the time being. As part of the DCHC MPO Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP), review other regional route alternative to St. Mary’s Road. If a route other than St. Mary’s Road is selected, amend the MTP to reflect the preferred regional route.” OUTBoard Action:Toreview materials and provide input to staffon the preferred regional bicycle route. b. Prioritization of Orange County transportation projects from approved plans. (Note: Staff will provide a summary table at the meeting that includes new and old projects.) OUTBoard Action:Review andbeginprioritization of transportation projects. Staff Updates a.Strategic Mobility Formula and Prioritization b.Project updates from NCDOT. OUTBoard Action: Receive updates Upcoming Agenda Items of Interest on Other Regional Transportation Related Board Agendas OUTBoard Action:Receive information as a handout 1 Time Item Page 8:507. Meeting Schedule – June 21st – Triangle Transit presentation; No JulyMeeting OUTBoard Action: Receive information 8:528.Board Comments OUTBoard Action: Receive comments 9:009. Adjournment 2 D R A F T MINUTES1 ORANGE UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION BOARD2 APRIL 17,20133 4 MEMBERS PRESENT: Paul Guthrie, Chapel Hill Township;Jeff Charles, Bicycle Advocate; Alex Castro, Bingham 5 Township; Susie Enoch, Cheeks Township;Sam Lasris, Cedar Grove Township; Ted Triebel, Little River Township;6 Amy Cole, Transit Advocate; Annette Jurgelski, Eno Township; 7 8 MEMBERS ABSENT: Bryant Warren, Hillsborough Township; Jeff Miles, Pedestrian Access & Safety Advocate; 9 Economic Development Commission - Vacant; CfE Representative-Vacant; Planning Board Representative- Vacant; 10 11 STAFF PRESENT:Abigaile Pittman, Transportation/Land UsePlanner;Tina Love, Administrative Assistant II 12 13 AGENDA ITEM I: CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL14 15 AGENDA ITEM II: APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 20,201316 APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR MARCH 20,201317 18 TheFebruary 20, 2013and March 20, 2013 OUTBoard Minutes were approved by consensus.19 20 AGENDA ITEM III: CONSIDERATIONS OF ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA21 22 AGENDA ITEM IV: REGULAR AGENDA23 Next Steps for Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Plan Adoption and Implementation.The 24 Planning staff has received authorization from the BOCC to proceed with initial SRTS 25 Action Plan adoption steps. Following adoption, the staff is recommending that the future 26 SRTS Advisory Committee be a sub-committee of the OUTBoard, supplemented by 27 additional staff as needed from the County, Orange County Schools, and the Town of 28 Hillsborough. Related 29 documents:http://www.orangecountync.gov/planning/documents/CompleteFinalDraftSRT30 S.pdf 31 OUTBoard Action:To receive information in preparation for future OUTBoard role.32 33 Abigaile Pittmanreviewed the Safe Routes to School Plan and advised therole of advisory committee wouldbe a 34 subcommittee of the OUTBoard responsible for advocating plan implementation and assistingwith programing, 35 evaluating plan progress and assessing plan priorities. The subcommittee with include interested OUTBoard 36 member, representatives for the schools, the Town of Hillsborough, and planning staff as needed. Others will be 37 brought in as necessary, such as NCDOT regarding road improvement, etc. and consultation from engineers and so 38 forth. Staff is meeting on April 30th.39 40 Jeff Charles commented that it is a good segueto the WalkBike NC Plan because you can’t do the SRTS Program 41 by itself, it has to be integrated into the bigger plan because of connectivity issues and you can use the SRTS to help 42 defend trying to get financing from NCDOT on the bicycle issues where they are trying to upgrade the monies. He 43 noted his cautionary point is to make sure it is not in its own bunker working on just this little issue, and talk about 44 more interconnectivity as it might relate to WalkBike NC Plans that NCDOT frees up these additional funds. It is 45 certainly a long term plan that doesn’t mean you don’t certainly do what you can around the schoolsbut make sure 46 that there is a plan for interconnectivity somewhere down the road and think it through.47 48 AGENDA ITEM V: REGULAR AGENDA49 WalkBike NC Plan –a North Carolina Statewide Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan50 WalkBike NC is North Carolina’s first statewidemaster plan to define a vision, goals 51 and strategies for improving walking and bicycling for residents andvisitors.The Plan 52 identifies current conditions for walking and bicycling in North Carolina and serves as a 53 policy guide for state agencies, local governments, and private sector interests to develop 54 a transportation system that safely and efficiently accommodates walking and bicycling.55 3 ReturntoAgenda D R A F T The review period is short and the State is only accepting comments until April 30th.56 Therefore, the Plan has been pre-reviewed by OUTBoard Vice-Chair, Jeff Charles, and by 57 planningstaff member Abigaile Pittman. Related documents, including Draft Plan 58 Summary, Full Draft Plan, on-line comment form, and community engagement forum 59 (survey):http://www.ncdot.gov/bikeped/planning/walkbikenc/60 OUTBoard Action:To receive review comments suggested by Jeff Charles and Abigaile 61 Pittman, and consider recommended comments to be provided to NCDOT62 63 Abigaile Pittmanreviewed the WalkBike NC Plan noting that WalkBike NC is North Carolina’s first statewide master 64 plan to define a vision, goals and strategies for improving walking and bicycling for residents and visitors. She 65 shared the comments from staff and Jeff Charles.66 67 Jeff Charles noted that there was a lot of work put into this plan and he thinks the OUTBoard needs to give NCDOT 68 staff kudos for doing a pretty good job. He added that he thinks it’s important to tell them the positives and say ‘oh by 69 the way’ there are other things. Jeff elaborated that they took very unique approach, a good one, in that they looked 70 at economic factors, how it would improve tourism if we became a destination state for bicycling. They talked about 71 health issues, the obesity rates of young children, we rank fifth or sixth in the nation in obesity in children. They also 72 talk about economic benefits of health, safety, savings, environmental issues, increasing the use of these things. He 73 would like to come up with a general statement applauding their efforts in highlighting the need for bicycle and 74 pedestrian for all of these good reasons with the OUTBoard and staffs comments on how it can be improved.75 76 Abigaile Pittman advised that in her researchonline, that most other states have a safe routes for seniors programs.77 78 Jeff Charles noted that in the plan there is a benchmark reporting by the alliance for biking and walking from 2012. 79 Safest states to bicycle, the safest state in the US is South Dakota, North Carolina is 44th, safest state for walking is 80 Vermont and North Carolina is 41st. We are so far behind and we have to recognize they are taking an enormous 81 step forward with this new approach. 82 83 Paul Guthrie added that he thinks the plan is deficient in one way,it doesn’t sufficiently indicate that for any of this to 84 have any major long-term significance it has to integrated with the broader picture of transportation. That is 85 especially true for this county where walking and biking will be the feeders to future transportation systems. We are 86 beginning to look at the infancy of transportation systems across the entire county. One thing we need to is can that 87 be the beginning of feeding for bus transportation, rail transportation and it doesn’t speak to that in this plan.Paul 88 referencesthe statistic of 6.7% of residents without automobiles in the report and suggested that in rural areas of the 89 county that rate is probably higher as high as 13%.90 91 Paul Guthrie suggested that the report should show examples.92 93 Jeff Charles elaborated that this is an enormous step. He noted that this is becoming a big issue in respect to 94 bicycling infrastructure because we are looking for new modes of transportation in Orange County and we are seeing 95 these scooters that can only go 30 mph in 55 mph zones and they are going to flow into the 4 foot bike lanes as 96 bailout to allow vehicles to pass them. He noted that while Segways are not going to catch on but new technology, 97 organic transit, they are 36 to 42 inches wide, so when you talk about a 4 or 5 foot lane that is a problem. He added 98 that they are also designing a truck that could carry 850 lb.loads so you could envision that being used for pizza 99 delivery or grocery delivery and meals on wheels. Jeff noted that the report cites a shift in demographics to 65 from 100 13% today to about 20% and we need to broaden the thought process forthe upright bicycles, scooters and other 101 competing technology in these four foot bike lanes we are arguing for.102 103 Abigaile Pittman added that in some communities residentstool around in golf carts.104 105 Alex Castro agreed with Jeff’s comments and staff’s comments. Alex Castro moved to approve the submitted 106 comments and the additional comments discussed at the meeting. Ted Triebel seconded the motion.107 108 4 ReturntoAgenda D R A F T Ted Triebel added that his thoughts run parallel with Alex’s and he was happy to see the work staff and Jeff did and 109 commended both. He particularly agrees with comment number 6 as going to the critical core to keep in mind going 110 forward.111 112 The OUTBoard approved the submitted and discussed comments be submitted to NCDOT for the WalkBike NC Plan 113 by consensus.114 115 AGENDA ITEM VI: STAFF UPDATES116 a.Update on staff meeting with NCDOT Rail Division regarding the three proposed 117 railroad private crossing closures in Orange County. Related 118 documents: http://orangecountync.gov/planning/RRCrossingClosure.asp119 b.Update on proposed Old Well to Jordan Lake Scenic Byway.120 c.Update on the Triangle Air Quality Report released on 4-3-13 for public comment. 121 Related documents: http://www.triangleair.org/topics.htm#transconf122 d.Update on changes to the DCHC MPO 2040 MTP Bicycle Map based on comments by 123 Orange County Planning staff. 124 e.Update on workshop for TARPO Locally Coordinated Human Service Public 125 Transportation Plan. 126 f.Update on the upcoming development of the Eno Economic Development District 127 (EDD) Access Management Plan. 128 OUTBoard Action: Receive updates129 130 Abigaile Pittman updated the OUTBoard that she and Craig Benedict met with the NCDOT Rail Division, the NCDOT 131 Planning Branch, and their consultant, Florence and Hutchinson on March 15th to review the remaining issues and 132 questions regarding the purposed rail crossing closing. NCDOT has responded in writing and there is a letter and 133 meeting minutes included in the packet.In the spring NCDOT will be completing the environmental assessment and 134 in the summer they will be conducting traffic impact analysis for extending Byrdville Road and Walter Clark Drive at 135 NC 86. In the fall they will finalize crossing improvement in the final environment assessment document. Final 136 design and right-of-way acquisitions will begin in early 2014 and in early 2015 they will begin construction.137 138 Abigaile Pittman updated the Board on a proposed new scenic byway in the county. She noted that there are three 139 existing scenic byways in Orange County, the Colonial Heritage Highway along NC 86 north of Hillsborough; the 140 Football Road, Old Greensboro Road west of Carrboro; and the Scots-Welsh Heritage Byway, Old NC 86, Arthur 141 Minus, Orange Grove, and Dairyland Roads. Over the past two years DEAPR has worked on this byway which will 142 link downtown Chapel Hill to Jordan Lake. The proposed byway is 15 miles long and features a number of locations 143 with historical, natural, recreational, and educational values.144 145 Abigaile Pittman updated the Board on the Triangle Air Quality Report released by the DCHC MPO for public 146 comment and the TAC approved the key components at their December meeting. She noted that staff has reviewed 147 it and has no comments. 148 149 Abigaile Pittman noted that the DCHC MPO 2040 MTP written report was released and approved back in December 150 2012 but the maps were released a few weeks ago and they had a mess of names for projects without real 151 descriptions and complicated financial spreadsheets but no maps. She reported that the bike map had several 152 issues and planning staff made comments to DCHC MPO TAC and as a result TAC approved changes to plan last 153 Wednesday when they met. Abigaile further noted that this is a compromise as some parts they wouldn’t change 154 and some they did. 155 156 Jeff Charles noted that in his communications he agreed that it is a good compromise regarding Old NC 86.157 158 Sam Lasris asked about the route alternative to NC 86 N around Coleman Loop Rd and Abigaile offered to bring all 159 the maps to the next meeting for the OUTBoard’s review of the changes.160 161 Abigaile Pittman advised the OUTBoard on the workshop for TARPOfor locally coordinated human services 162 transportation. The workshop will be held on April 16th from 9 am to noon at Southern Human Services in Chapel 163 5 ReturntoAgenda D R A F T Hill. She advised it will focus on the needs of rural Orange and Chatham Counties as part of the larger TARPO 164 region and will not focus on the urban transit services provided by Chapel Hill Transit or Triangle Transitbut more 165 rural services provided by Orange Public Transit and Chatham Transit Network. This plan ensures that transit 166 systems and other transportation providers in the region remain eligible for certain federal funds. Abigaile noted this 167 plan is required by law in order to get federal funds and is needed to identify the specific areas of need for individuals 168 with disabilities, seniors, and low income.169 170 Alex Castro advised that he will be attending and will put together a report for the OUTBoard.171 172 Abigaile Pittman updated the OUTBoard regarding the Eno EDD Access Management Plan that she will be heading 173 up and noted the plan will provide better transportation system and capacities to serve the US 70 and Hwy 10 area. 174 Staff will be asking approval to move forward at the May 7 BOCC meeting. Abigaile noted she anticipates that the 175 OUTBoard will review that plan in September and make comments for the BOCC.176 177 AGENDA ITEM VII: UPCOMING AGENDA ITEMS OF INTEREST ON OTHER REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION RELATED 178 BOARD AGENDAS:179 OUTBoard Action:Receive informationas handout.180 181 Abigaile Pittman gave the OUTBoard handouts to review at theirconvenience.182 183 Jeff Charles asked about coordinating with Durham City/County planning for connectivity in bike plans. 184 185 Abigaile Pittman will look into that and get back to Jeff.186 187 AGENDA ITEM VIII: LISTING OF ITEMS FOR APRIL 17,2013MEETING188 OUTBoard Action:Receive information189 190 Abigaile Pittman advised the OUTBoard that a transportation planner has been hired to fill the vacancy created when 191 Darcy Zorio left to take a job at Triangle Transit.His name is Bret Martin and he will start on May 20th and will attend 192 the May OUTBoard meeting.193 194 The OUTBoard moved, secondedand unanimously approved to change the MayOUTBoard meeting from 195 Wednesday, May 15th to Wednesday,May 22nd. 196 197 AGENDA ITEM IX: BOARD COMMENTS198 OUTBoard Action:Receive comments199 200 AGENDA ITEM X: ADJOURNMENT201 202 The meeting was adjourned by consensus.203 204 Items for future meetings:205 206 x Send Jeff Charles the recommend route to be used as an alternative to St. Mary’s Road 207 x Bring the Bike Maps to the May meeting208 209 6 ReturntoAgenda ORANGE COUNTY ORANGE UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION BOARD (OUTBOARD) REGULARAGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date:May 22, 2013 RegularAgenda Item No.4.a. SUBJECT:Review of St. Mary’s Road as a regional bicycle route DEPARTMENT:Planning and Inspections PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N)No ATTACHMENT(S): 1.DCHC MPO Draft 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) On-Road Facilities Map 2.Staff’s Comment Letter (4-4-2013) 3.Orange County/NCDOTBicycle Map 4.NCDOT/Orange County Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) Bicycle Map 5.Town of Hillsborough Community Connectivity Plan Map INFORMATION CONTACT: Abigaile Pittman, Transportation/Land Use Planner, 245-2567 PURPOSE: To review materials related to the bicycle route classification of St. Mary’s Road, and provide input to the Planning staff on the preferred regional bicycle route. BACKGROUND: TheDCHC MPO Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) approved the key components of the 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), such as the highway, bicycle and transit projects and the financial plan, at their December 2012 meeting. The TAC is the MPO’s policy board and is the ultimate decision-making body on MPO plans.Then several months ago the DCHC MPO released the full report for the 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (2040 MTP) and the related Air Quality Analysis and Conformity Determination report (AQ Conformity) for public comment, and the maps related to the MTP (including the On-Road Facilities Map). Upon reviewof the DCHC MPOdraft Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) On-Road Bicycle Facilities Map (Attachment 1) staff noted that asegment of St. Mary’s Road between US 70 Bypass and the Durham County line was identified as a Regional Bicycle Facility. The Planning staff asked that this designation be removed in favor of a preferred alternative consistent with Orange County’s and the Town of Hillsborough’s approved bicycle routes (Attachments 2, 3, 4 and 5). In response, the DCHC TAC opted to: “Maintain St. Mary’s Road as a regional bicycle route in the MTP for the time being. As part of the DCHC MPO Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP), review other regional route alternativesto St. Mary’s Road. If a route other than St. Mary’s Road is selected, amend theMTP to reflect the preferred regional route.” 1 7 ReturntoAgenda REVIEW OF EXISTING APPROVED ALTERNATE ROUTES Orange County/NCDOT and Town of Hillsborough bicycle related plans are summarized below. Together, these plans support an alternate route utilizing New Sharon Church Road and Guess Road to connect northern Durham to Hillsborough. NCDOT/Orange County The 2010 Orange County/NCDOT Bicycle Map (Attachment 3), reviewed and recommended by the OUTBoard, and approved by the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) supportsa route other thanonly St. Mary’s to connect northern Durham to Hillsborough.The map depictsSt. Mary’s Road to New SharonChurchRoad, toGuess Road, to the County line. The Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) prepared by NCDOT for rural Orange County was reviewed and recommended by the OUTBoard and approved by the BOCC in March. The approved CTP Bicycle Map (Attachment 4) depicts a bicycle route along New SharonChurch Road. Town of Hillsborough In 2009 the Town of Hillsborough adopted a Bike Lane and Recommendations Map as part of its Community Connectivity Plan (Attachment 5). The Town’s map supports a route other than St. Mary’s to connect northern Durham to Hillsborough. The map depictsSt. Mary’s Road to New SharonChurchRoad(which would then connect to Guess Road and then to the County line). OUTBOARD ACTION It is the OUTBoard’s prerogative to review and comment on the DCHC MPO’s designation of St. Mary’s Road as a regional bicycle route from Hillsborough to downtown Durham. Thestaff requests that the OUTBoard provide input to the staff to: 1. Endorse the St.Mary’s Road/New Sharon Church Road/Guess Road route as the preferred bicycle route to connect northern Durham to Hillsborough; OR 2.Endorse St. Mary’s Road as the preferred bicycle route to connect northern Durham to Hillsborough; OR 3. Opt not to endorse anyregionalbicycle routeconnectingnorthern Durham to Hillsborough. The staff also requests that the OUTBoard provide rationale for its chosen route, such as consistency with previously approved Orange County/NCDOT and Town of Hillsborough bicycle maps, safety of the route vs alternatives, right-of-way width or grade, etc. 2 8 ReturntoAgenda 20 4 0 M e t r o p o l i t i a n Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n P l a n ± 05 1 0 2. 5 Mi l e s Fe b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 1 3 Th i s m a p w a s c o m p i l e d u s i n g t h e b e s t a v a i l a b l e d a t a , h o w e v e r , th e C a p i t a l A r e a M P O i s n o t r e s p o n s i b l e f o r e r r o r s , o m i s s i o n s , an d / o r m i s u s e . S u b j e c t t o c h a n g e . Wa k e Jo h n s t o n Ha r n e t t Na s h Le e Fr a n k l i n Wa y n e Ch a t h a m Or a n g e Gr a n v i l l e Du r h a m Wa r r e n Pe r s o n Va n c e Wi l s o n Sa m p s o n Ca s w e l l On - R o a d F a c i l i t i e s St a t e B i c y c l e F a c i l i t i e s Re g i o n a l B i c y c l e F a c i l i t i e s Lo c a l B i c y c l e F a c i l i t i e s IN S E T N O T T O S C A L E IN S E T A IN S E T A 01 2 Mi l e s IN S E T B IN S E T B IN S E T C IN S E T C 00 . 5 1 Mi l e Du r h a m 0 0 . 7 5 1 . 5 Mi l e s Ra l e i g h *D C H C M P O S t a t e a n d R e g i o n a l r o u t e s a r e s h o w n o n t h e O n - R o a d F a c i l i t i e s m a p . A p p e n d i x 4 p r o v i d e s a l i s t i n g o f t h e r o u t e s . 9 Re t u r n t o A g e n d a 10 ReturntoAgenda 11 ReturntoAgenda 12 ReturntoAgenda 13 ReturntoAgenda 14 Durham-Chapel Hill- Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization Burlington-Graham Metropolitan Planning Organization 86 54 57 49 157 O r a n g e G ro v e R d (S R 1006) Old Greensb or o Rd (SR 10 0 5 ) Dodsons Cross Rd (SR1102) N e w S h a r o n C h u r c h R d (S R 1 5 38) HighRock R d (SR1340) B u c k h o r n Rd ( S R 1 1 1 4) C a rr S t ore R d(SR1004) Schle y R d (SR1548) Lynch StoreRd(SR1364) H ig hla n d F ar m R d ( S R 1332) HollyRidg e R d(S R 1524) C a r r S t o r e R d (S R 1 3 5 2 ) Mebane Oaks Rd (SR 100 7) W alnutGroveChurchRd (SR1001) B r a d s h a w Q ua rr y R d (S R 1 1 1 5 ) WhiteCrossRd (SR1951) Efland-Cedar Grove R d (SR 100 4/ 1 3 5 7 ) Dai ryland Rd(SR 1177) C o r b e tt R id g e R d ( S R 1 0 0 4) S a w m i l l Rd (S R 1 5 4 5) J o n es F e r r y R d (S R 1 9 4 2 ) OakGro v e C h u rc h R d (SR 1117) ¬¬M2 ¬¬M2 A l a m a n c e C o u n t y C a s w e l l C o u n t y P e r s o n C o u n t y D u r h a m C o u n t y C h a t h a m C o u n t y Bicycle Map Existing Needs Improvement Recommended On-road Existing Needs Improvement Recommended Off-road Existing Grade Separation Proposed Grade Separation Needs Improvement Recommended Existing Multi-Use Paths ¬¬M#North Carolina Bike Route Orange County Comprehensive Transportation Plan DRAFT Plan date: December 11, 2012 q 01234 Miles Figure 1 Sheet 4 of 5 Refer to CTP document for more details Base map date: April, 2009 15 ReturntoAgenda 16 ReturntoAgenda ,WHPE 5HYLHZRI3URMHFW3ULRULWL]DWLRQIURP 17 ReturntoAgenda 18 ReturntoAgenda 19 ReturntoAgenda 20 ReturntoAgenda 21 ReturntoAgenda 22 ReturntoAgenda 23 ReturntoAgenda 24 ReturntoAgenda 5HYLHZRI3URMHFWV5HFRPPHQGHGE\WKH&RPSUHKHQVLYH7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ3ODQ 25 ReturntoAgenda 26 ReturntoAgenda 86 54 57 49 157 O r a n g e G ro v e R d (S R 1006) Old Greensb or o Rd (SR 10 0 5 ) Dodsons Cross Rd (SR 1102) N e w S h a r o n C h urc h R d (S R 1 5 38) W i l k e r s o n R d ( S R 1507) HighRock R d (SR1340) M o u n t W i lli n g R d (S R 1120) B u c k h o r n Rd (SR 1114 ) C a rr S t ore R d(SR1004) M ill C r e e k Rd (SR1343) Schle y R d (SR1548) Lynch StoreRd(SR1364) L ittle River Church Rd (SR 1543) H ig hla n d F ar m R d ( S R 1332) Arthur Minnis Rd (S R 1 1 1 5 /1 1 13)Old NC 86(SR 1009) HollyRidg e R d(S R 1524) C a r r S t o r e R d (S R 1 3 5 2 ) Mebane Oaks Rd (SR 100 7) W aln utGroveChurch R d (SR 10 01) B r a d s h a w Q u a r r y R d (S R 1 1 1 5 ) WhiteCrossRd (SR1951) Efland-Cedar Grove R d (SR 100 4/ 1 3 5 7 ) Dai r ylandRd(SR 1177) C o r b e tt R i d g e R d ( S R 1 0 0 4) S a w m i l l R d (S R 1 5 4 5) MorrowMill R d (S R 1 9 5 8 ) Cra w f o rd D air y R d ( SR 1 9 56) O r a nge Chapel C l o ver Garden R d ( SR1956) J o n es F e r r y R d (S R 1 9 4 2 ) OakGrov e C h u r c h R d ( S R 1117) Durham-Chapel Hill- Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization Burlington-Graham Metropolitan Planning Organization A l a m a n c e C o u n t y C a s w e l l C o u n t y P e r s o n C o u n t y D u r h a m C o u n t y C h a t h a m C o u n t y Orange County Comprehensive Transportation Plan Highway Map q 01234 MilesExisting Needs Improvement Recommended Freeways Existing Needs Improvement Recommended Expressways Existing Needs Improvement Recommended Boulevards Existing Needs Improvement Recommended Other Major Thoroughfares Existing Needs Improvement Recommended Minor Thoroughfares Existing Grade Separation Proposed Grade Separation Existing Interchange Proposed Interchange DRAFT Figure 1 Sheet 2 of 5 Refer to CTP document for more details Base map date: April, 2009 Plan date: December 11, 2012 27 ReturntoAgenda +,*+:$<352-(&7'(6&5,37,216)5207+(&737(&+1,&$/5(3257 NC 54 (Orange Grove Road to Neville Road/DCHC MPO), Local ID ORAN0002-H: NC 54 from Orange Grove Road (SR 1006) to Neville Road (SR 1945) (the DCHC MPO boundary) is projected to exceed Level of Service (LOS) D by 2035. Improvements are needed in order to relieve anticipated congestion and to maintain a minimum LOS D on the existing facility. This section of NC 54 is currently a 2-lane, 24-foot undivided cross section, with a continuous center turn lane in some segments. The CTP project proposal is to provide a 4-lane divided cross section for this facility. The addition of a median will allow for better access control, thereby providing higher mobility for the facility. NC 86 (Coleman Loop Road/DCHC MPO to Caswell County), Local ID ORAN0001-H: NC 86 from Coleman Loop Road (SR 1334) (the DCHC MPO boundary) to Walnut Grove Church Road (SR 1001) is projected to exceed Level of Service (LOS) D by 2035. Improvements are needed in order to relieve anticipated congestion and to maintain a minimum LOS D on the existing facility. In addition, NC 86 throughout northern Orange County is identified as a recommended expressway on the Strategic Highway Corridor Vision Plan, in order to maintain regional and statewide mobility and connectivity. This section of NC 86 is currently a 2-lane, 24-foot undivided cross section. The CTP project proposal is to provide a 4-lane divided expressway cross section for this facility from Coleman Loop Road (SR 1334) (the DCHC MPO boundary) to Caswell County. This includes the section of NC 86 that is concurrent with NC 49. The conversion to an expressway is consistent with the Strategic Highway Corridors Vision Plan. Refer to the draft DCHC MPO 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and CTP for the preferred concept for NC 86, which will connect this CTP project segment to I-40 with a consistent expressway cross section around the Town of Hillsborough. The CTP was temporarily delayed in the spring of 2010 due to local concerns with this project proposal and the Strategic Highway Corridors designation. However, while traffic on NC 86 is still projected to exceed capacity, CTP traffic projectionsto 2035 do not warrant a full expressway cross section within the planning horizon of this CTP. Ultimately, it was decided to move forward with the CTP, including this project proposal, with the understanding that the proposed cross section is ultimately driven by vision and not yet by traffic. NC 86 will be improved as needed, with the ultimate vision of an expressway. As with all projects, any improvements to NC 86 must also be submitted and programmed through NCDOT’s Project Prioritization process in order to enter project development. This project proposal overlaps with NCDOT project W-5318 to provide geometric improvements, paved shoulders, and rumble strips to NC 86 from NC 57 (inside the DCHC MPO) to the Caswell County line. NCDOT project W-5318 is scheduled to begin right-of-way in January, 2012 and construction in January, 2013. Buckhorn Road Extension, Local ID ORAN0008-H:Buckhorn Road (SR 1114) and Dairyland Road (SR 1177) are currently primary choices for travel in southwest Orange County. However, the two roadways are discontinuous at their shared intersection with Orange Grove Road (SR 1006),another primary carrier throughout the area. The CTP project proposal is to provide a new location 2-lane cross section at Orange Grove Road (SR 1006) to extend Buckhorn Road (SR 1114) (ORAN0004-H) into Dairyland Road (SR 1177). This will provide better connectivity and improve traffic flow for this area of the county. Little River Church Road Extension, Local ID ORAN0005-H: Northern Orange County contains very few options for continuous east-west travel beyond the primary route along Carr Store Road (SR1004 / SR 1352), Sawmill Road (SR 1545), and Little River Church Road (SR 1543). However, Sawmill Road (SR 1545) and Little River Church Road (SR 1543) are discontinuous at their shared intersection with Walnut Grove Church Road (SR 1001). The CTP projectproposal is to provide a new location 2-lane cross section at Walnut Grove Church Road (SR 1001) to extend Little River Church Road (SR 1543) into Sawmill Road (SR 1545). This will provide better east-west continuity and connectivity for this area of the county. Minor Improvements Not all of the following facilities are projected to exceed Level of Service (LOS) D by2035, but improvements such as turn lanes, minor widening, and/or surfacing are idealfor better mobility and more streamlined facilities as growth occurs. Arthur Minnis Road (SR 1115), Local ID ORAN0003-H:Arthur Minnis Road(SR 1115) from Dodsons Cross Road (SR 1102) to Rocky Ridge Road / ArthurMinnis Road (SR 1113) is currently an unsurfaced, 20-foot cross section. TheCTP project proposal is to provide a surfaced, 24-foot cross section suitable forpublic traffic use. The CTP committee identified the importance of this facility foreast-west connectivity in this area of the county. Buckhorn Road (SR 1114), Local ID ORAN0004-H:Buckhorn Road (SR 1114)from Orange Grove Road (SR 1006) to Bradshaw Quarry Road (SR 1115) iscurrently an unsurfaced, 20-foot cross section. The CTP project proposal is toprovide a surfaced, 24-foot cross section suitable for public traffic use. The CTPcommittee identified the importance of this facility for north-south connectivity inthis area of the county. (North) Efland-Cedar Grove Road (SR 1004), SPOT ID # 559:Efland-CedarGrove Road (SR 1004) from Highland Farm Road (SR 1332) to Carr Store Road(SR1004 / SR 1352) is currently a 2-lane, 20-foot cross section. The CTPproject proposal is to provide a 24-foot cross section with improvements to turnlanes and straightening of the roadway where needed. This project proposaloverlaps with NCDOT project W-5143 to improve the horizontal alignment of thecurve on Efland-Cedar Grove Road (SR 1004) north of the intersection withHighland Farm Road (SR 1332). NCDOT project W-5143 is scheduled to beginright-of-way in April, 2013 and construction in April, 2014. Mebane Oaks Road (SR 1007), Local ID ORAN0006-H:Mebane Oaks Road(SR 1007) from NC 54 to Alamance County is currently a 2-lane, 22-foot crosssection. The CTP project proposal is to provide a 24-foot cross section with wideshoulders and turn lanes where needed. Old NC 86 (SR 1009), Local ID ORAN0007-H:Old NC 86 (SR 1009) fromArthur Minnis Road (SR 1113) (the DCHC MPO boundary) to Davis Road (SR1129) (the DCHC MPO boundary) is currently a 2-lane, 22-foot cross section.The CTP project proposal is to provide a 24-foot cross section with wideshoulders and turn lanes where needed. 28 ReturntoAgenda $'237('5(9,6,216727+(&73+,*+:$<0$3$1'352-(&767$7(0(176 D7KHGDVKHGOLQHOHJHQGVIRU0LQRU7KRURXJKIDUHVDUHYHU\GLIILFXOWWRUHDGRQWKHPDS,WLV VXJJHVWHGWKDWWKHGDVKHGOLQHVIRUµ1HHGV,PSURYHPHQW¶DQGµ5HFRPPHQGHG¶EHPDGHDEROGHUFRORU WKDWZRXOGEHPRUHYLVLEOH E([WHQGWKH0LQRU7KRURXJKIDUHµ1HHGV,PSURYHPHQW¶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¶WPDNHVHQVHWRLQYHVWLQDQ\ZLGHQLQJIRUELNHSDWKVXQOHVVWKHURXWHFDQEH VWUDLJKWHQHGDQGWKHHOHYDWLRQLVVXHVDGGUHVVHG 29 ReturntoAgenda 30 ReturntoAgenda Durham-Chapel Hill- Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization Burlington-Graham Metropolitan Planning Organization 86 54 57 49 157 O r a n g e G ro v e R d (S R 1006) Old Greensb or o Rd (SR 10 0 5 ) Dodsons Cross Rd (SR1102) N e w S h a r o n C h u r c h R d (S R 1 5 38) HighRock R d (SR1340) B u c k h o r n Rd ( S R 1 1 1 4) C a rr S t ore R d(SR1004) Schle y R d (SR1548) Lynch StoreRd(SR1364) H ig hla n d F ar m R d ( S R 1332) HollyRidg e R d(S R 1524) C a r r S t o r e R d (S R 1 3 5 2 ) Mebane Oaks Rd (SR 100 7) W alnutGroveChurchRd (SR1001) B r a d s h a w Q ua rr y R d (S R 1 1 1 5 ) WhiteCrossRd (SR1951) Efland-Cedar Grove R d (SR 100 4/ 1 3 5 7 ) Dai ryland Rd(SR 1177) C o r b e tt R id g e R d ( S R 1 0 0 4) S a w m i l l Rd (S R 1 5 4 5) J o n es F e r r y R d (S R 1 9 4 2 ) OakGro v e C h u rc h R d (SR 1117) ¬¬M2 ¬¬M2 A l a m a n c e C o u n t y C a s w e l l C o u n t y P e r s o n C o u n t y D u r h a m C o u n t y C h a t h a m C o u n t y Bicycle Map Existing Needs Improvement Recommended On-road Existing Needs Improvement Recommended Off-road Existing Grade Separation Proposed Grade Separation Needs Improvement Recommended Existing Multi-Use Paths ¬¬M#North Carolina Bike Route Orange County Comprehensive Transportation Plan DRAFT Plan date: December 11, 2012 q 01234 Miles Figure 1 Sheet 4 of 5 Refer to CTP document for more details Base map date: April, 2009 31 ReturntoAgenda (;&(5372)BICYCLEPROJECTS )5207+(&737(&+1,&$/5(3257 The Orange County Bicycle Transportation Plan was adopted in 1999and was intended todevelop transportation facilities and programsfor bicyclists in Orange County. These recommendations were incorporated intothe Orange County CTP. The1999 Orange County Bicycle Transportation Plan anddetailed information regarding its recommendations are available through Orange County. Minor additionstotheCTP recommendationsbeyondthe 1999 Orange County BicycleTransportation Plan are listed below. As previously mentioned,thenetwork of CTPrecommendations provides a combination of recreational and commutingopportunities. x Local ID ORAN0001-B: NC 86 from Carr Store Road (SR 1352) / Sawmill Road W (SR 1545) to proposedpark-and-ride lotat Cedar Grove Park (ORAN0004-T).This recommendation wasadded in order to provideusers onthe recommended bicycle facility along Carr Store Road (SR 1352) / Sawmill Road W (SR 1545) with access topublic transportation services via the proposed park-and-ride lot (ORAN0004-T). This is currently an on-road recommendationfor more immediate improvements,butthe ultimate 4-lane expressway cross section forNC 86 in the future could require anoff- roadfacilityto maintain this connection for bicycles. x Local ID ORAN0002-B: NC Bike Route 2 / Mountainsto Sea Trail along Old Greensboro Road (SR 1005) from Carl Durham Road (SR 1950)to Bowden Road (SR 1946) (theDCHC MPO boundary). Although this facility is already designatedas NC Bike Route2, this section is in needofupgrades,such as wider lanesorshoulders, in orderto accommodate bicycles. (The section from Alamance Countyto Carl Durham Road (SR 1950)has recently been widened and resurfaced.) x Local ID ORAN0003-B: Jones Ferry Road (SR 1942) from Chatham Countyto Ferguson Road (SR1948) (the DCHC MPOboundary). This project was included in order to ensure connectivity withthe2035DCHC MPO Long Range Transportation Plan recommendationsand the draftDCHC MPO 2040Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and CTP recommendations. x Local ID ORAN0004-B: NC 86 from Phelps Rd (SR 1551)to Walnut Grove Church Rd (SR 1001). This project was included in orderto provideconnectivity with recommendations in the draftDCHC MPO 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and CTP recommendations. x Local ID ORAN0005-B: Walnut Grove Church Rd (SR 1001) from NC 86to Pearson Rd (SR1544). This project was included in order to provideconnectivity with recommendations in the draftDCHC MPO 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and CTP recommendations. x Local ID ORAN0006-B: Schley Rd (SR 1548) from Walnut Grove Church Rd(SR 1001)to New Sharon Church Rd (SR 1538) (theDCHC MPO boundary) (SR 1001)to New Sharon Church Rd (SR 1538) (theDCHC MPO boundary). This project was included in orderto provideconnectivity with recommendations in the draftDCHC MPO 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and CTPrecommendations. x Local ID ORAN0007-B: Efland-Cedar Grove Rd (SR 1357) from Carr Store Rd(SR 1004/1352)to McDade Store Rd (SR 1358/1354). This project was included in order to providefurther connectivity between recommendations included from the1999 Orange County Bicycle Transportation Plan. x Local ID ORAN0008-B: McDade Store Rd (SR 1361) from Pentecost Rd (SR 1361) / McDade Store Rd (SR 1358) to NC 49.This project was included in orderto providefurtherconnectivity between recommendations included fromthe1999 Orange County Bicycle Transportation Plan. x Local ID ORAN0009-B: NC 49 from McDade Store Rd (SR 1361)to CaswellCounty. This project was included in order to provide further connectivitybetween recommendations included fromthe1999 Orange County Bicycle Transportation Plan. x Local ID ORAN0010-B: W Lebanon Rd (SR 1306) from Saddle Club Rd (SR 1346)to Mill Creek Rd (SR 1345). This project was included in orderto provide connectivity with recommendations in the draftDCHC MPO 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and CTP recommendations. x SPOT ID 1160: Orange Grove Road (SR 1006)and Buckhorn Road (SR 1114) from Dairyland Road (SR 1177) to West Ten Road (SR 1146). This project was submittedbythe Triangle Area RPO tothe NCDOT Strategic Planning Office of Transportation (SPOT) as part of the Prioritization 2.0 Process in 2011. This projectoverlaps with a section of NCDOT project EB-5520on Orange Grove Road (SR 1006) between Dairyland Road (SR 1177)and Buckhorn Road (SR 1114). x Local ID EB-5520: NCDOT projectEB-5520 is to add 4-footshoulders to Orange Grove Road (SR 1006) from NC 54to Arthur Minnis Road (SR 1115). There is currently no right-of-wayor constructiondate scheduled. This project overlaps with the Orange Grove Road (SR 1006) section ofSPOTID1160 between Dairyland Road (SR 1177) and Buckhorn Road (SR 1114). The projects below were also submittedbythe Triangle Area RPO totheNCDOT Strategic PlanningOffice of Transportation (SPOT) aspart of the Prioritization 2.0 Process in 2011, but were already included in the CTP recommendations taken from the1999 Orange County Bicycle Transportation Plan. x SPOT ID 1095:Dairyland Road (SR 1177) from Union Grove Church Road (SR 1111) to Orange Grove Road (SR 1006). x SPOT ID 958:Orange Grove Road (SR 1006)and Dodsons Cross Road (SR1102) from I-40to Dairyland Road (SR 1177). x SPOT ID 559:Efland-Cedar Grove Road (SR 1004) from Highland Farm Road (SR 1332) to Carr Store Road (SR 1004 /SR 1352). $'237('5(99,6,216727+(%,&N&H(0$3$1'352-(&767$7(0(176 0DNHQRFKDQJHWRWKH%LF\FOH0DSZKLFKVKRZVQRLPSURYHPHQWVWRWKHDIRUHPHQWLRQHGVHFWLRQRI2OG1&DQGUHXHVW IRUFRQVLVWHQF\WKDWQRLPSURYHPHQWVDUHUHIOHFWHGLQWKHGUDIW&73ELF\FOHSODQIRUWKH'&+&032 32 ReturntoAgenda 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Durham-Chapel Hill- Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization Burlington-Graham Metropolitan Planning Organization 86 54 57 49 157 Dodsons Cross Rd (SR1102) N e w S h a r o n C h u r c h R d (S R 153 8) HighRock R d (SR1340) M o u nt W il l i n g R d (S R 1 1 2 0 ) C a rr S t ore R d(SR1004) S c hl ey R d ( S R 1548) L i ttle River Church Rd (SR 1543) H ig hla n d F ar m R d ( S R 1332) C a r r S t o r e R d (S R 1 3 5 2 ) Wa lnutGroveChurchRd(SR1001) Efland-Cedar Grove R d (SR 100 4/1 3 5 7 ) Dai ryland Rd(SR 1177) S a w m i l l Rd (S R 1 5 4 5) P e destrian M o u ntainstoSeaTrail Upper Eno / Cedar Grove Upper Eno / Cedar Grove Little River Little River Cane Creek / Bingham Camp Chestnut Ridge Cane Creek Reservoir A l a m a n c e C o u n t y C a s w e l l C o u n t y P e r s o n C o u n t y D u r h a m C o u n t y C h a t h a m C o u n t y Z[70]^85 ]^40 Pedestrian Map 5 Local Recreation SitesRural Communities Existing Grade Separation Proposed Grade Separation q 01234 Miles Refer to CTP document for more details Base map date: April, 2009 Multi-Use Paths Existing Needs Improvement Recommended Needs Improvement Recommended Existing Sidewalks Needs Improvement Recommended Existing Off-Road Orange County Comprehensive Transportation Plan DRAFT Plan date: December 11, 2012 Figure 1 Sheet 5 of 5 33 ReturntoAgenda (;&(537)5207+(&737(&+1,&$/5(32575(*$5',1*PEDESTRIANPROJECTS Orange County currentlyhas apedestrian planunder development for off-roadpedestrian facilities throughoutthe county. Existing recommendations fromthis plan were incorporated intothe Orange County CTP. The County’s pedestrian plan and detailedinformation regardingits recommendations areavailable through Orange County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eturntoAgenda Durham-Chapel Hill- Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization Burlington-Graham Metropolitan Planning Organization 86 54 57 49 157 Dodsons Cross Rd (SR1102) C a r r S t o r e R d (S R 1 3 5 2 ) WhiteCrossRd (SR1951) S a w mi l l Rd (S R 1 5 4 5) A l a m a n c e C o u n t y C a s w e l l C o u n t y P e r s o n C o u n t y D u r h a m C o u n t y C h a t h a m C o u n t y 3 3 Public Transportation and Rail Map Recommended Existing Fixed Guideway Needs Improvement Recommended Existing Needs Improvement Recommended Existing Bus Routes Needs Improvement High Speed Rail Corridor Existing Recommended Park and Ride Lot "Recommended Existing" Operational Strategies Intermodal Connector Existing Recommended Active Inactive Rail Corridor Recommended Existing Recommended Rail Stops Orange County Comprehensive Transportation Plan DRAFT Plan date: December 11, 2012 q 01234 Miles Figure 1 Sheet 3 of 5 Refer to CTP document for more details Base map date: April, 2009 35 ReturntoAgenda (;&(5372)PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION & RAIL 352-(&7'(6&5,37,216)5207+(&737(&+1,&$/5(3257 There are currently no existing rail facilities or recommendations within the CTP planning area; Orange County’s existing rail lines are contained within the MPO areas. Bus Routes “The Bus and Rail Investment Plan in Orange County”, adopted by the Orange County Board of County Commissioners on October 2, 2012, was utilized in the development of the bus element of the Orange County CTP. The CTP bus Recommendations are listed below. More detailed information regarding “The Bus and Rail Investment Plan in Orange County” is available through Orange County. x Local ID ORAN0001-T:Bus route along NC 54 from Alamance County to Neville Road (SR 1945) (the DCHC MPO boundary). The draft DCHC MPO 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and CTP identifies this recommendation as Express Bus projects B6a and B6b. x Local ID ORAN0002-T:Bus route along NC 86 from Coleman Loop Road (SR 1334) (the DCHC MPO boundary) to Caswell County. Park-and-Ride Lots The CTP proposes the following potential park-and-ride lots to provide access to the proposed bus routes (ORAN0001-T and ORAN0002-T). All locations are based on current available information and are subject to change based on further study in the future. In addition,specific information such as number of spaces, surface of lot, and additional amenities would be developed at a later date. The CTP recommendation identifies general areas where lots are anticipated to be needed, with the intent of initially small lots with relatively minor amenities that grow as ridership increases. x Local ID ORAN0003-T:The CTP project proposal is to provide a park-and-ride lot at the intersection of NC 54 and White Cross Road (SR 1951). This project would provide access to the bus routealong NC 54 (ORAN0001-T), for users of both vehicles and bicycles. x Local ID ORAN0004-T:The CTP project proposal is to provide a park-and-ride lot at the Cedar Grove Park on NC 86.This project would provide access to the bus route along NC 86, for usersof both vehicles and bicycles (ORAN0001-B). $'237('5(9,6,216727+(&7338%/,&75$163257$7,21$1'5$,/0$3$1'352-(&76 3DJH,,3XEOLF7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ 5DLO3UREOHP6WDWHPHQWV3URMHFW'HVFULSWLRQV±$GGDVWDWHPHQWWR WKHUDLOGLVFXVVLRQVWDWLQJWKDWWKHGHYHORSPHQWRIFRPPXWHUUDLOOLQHVLQWKH032DUHDVZLOOKDYHDWUDIILF LPSDFWRQVXUURXQGLQJµIHHGHU¶URXWHVWKDWPD\QHHGWREHDGGUHVVHG 36 turntoAgen NC D O T – P r i o r i t i z a t i o n 3 . 0 Wo r k g r o u p M e e t i n g # 9 Ap r i l 2 9 , 2 0 1 3 ,W H P E $ W W D F K P H Q W 37 Re t u r n t o A g e n a d Ac c e l e r a t i n g ŝnf r a s t r u c t u r e ŝnv e s t m e n t s fo r Ğco n o m i c Őro w t h hƐ Ğ ŝ Ŷ Ĩ ƌ Ɛ ƚ ƌ Ƶ Đ ƚ Ƶ ƌ Ğ ƚ Ž Đ Ă ƚ Ă ů Ǉ ǌ Ğ ĞĐ Ž Ŷ Ž ŵ ŝ Đ Ě Ğ ǀ Ğ ů Ž Ɖ ŵ Ğ Ŷ ƚ st r a t e g i c mo b i l i t y fo r m u l a ,W H P E $ W W D F K P H Q W 38 Re t u r n t o A g e n a d ho w we fu n d . ho w we di s t r i b u t e . ho w we pr i o r i t i z e . ne e d to ch a n g e hi g h im p a c t ,W H P E $ W W D F K P H Q W 39 Re t u r n t o A g e n a d st a t e re s o u r c e s ar e de c l i n i n g , fu t u r e fe d e r a l re s o u r c e s un c e r t a i n cu r r e n t fu n d i n g ,W H P E $ W W D F K P H Q W 40 Re t u r n t o A g e n a d pr o b l e m In f r a s t r u c t u r e ga p . De c l i n e in bu s i n e s s e s an d jo b s . In c r e a s e d po p u l a t i o n =In f r a s t r u c t u r e ne e d De c r e a s e d Re v e n u e pr o j e c t i o n s MF T , DM V , Hi g h w a y Ͳ $1 . 7 b +1. 3 m 20 1 3 Ͳ20 2 3 ,W H P E $ W W D F K P H Q W 41 Re t u r n t o A g e n a d Ye t , we ca n ad d r e s s pa r t of th e pr o b l e m th r o u g h ast r a t e g i c mo b i l i t y fo r m u l a so l u t i o n s Ad d r e s s sh r i n k i n g re v e n u e ,W H P E $ W W D F K P H Q W 42 Re t u r n t o A g e n a d (i n ) e q u i t y fo r m u l a ba s e d on %po p u l a t i o n an d eq u a l l y sh a r e d ac r o s s 14 di v i s i o n s ho w is it ĐƵ ƌ ƌ Ğ Ŷ ƚ ů Ǉ di s t r i b u t e d ? ,W H P E $ W W D F K P H Q W 43 Re t u r n t o A g e n a d re g i o n s & di v i s i o n s ,W H P E $ W W D F K P H Q W 44 Re t u r n t o A g e n a d st r a t e g i c a l l y in v e s t re s o u r c e s to en s u r e st a t e , re g i o n a l , an d lo c a l pr i o r i t i e s ar e me t st a t e 40 % re g i o n 40 % di v i s i o n 20 % ,W H P E $ W W D F K P H Q W 45 Re t u r n t o A g e n a d 40 % o f F u n d s = $ 6 B 40 % o f F u n d s = $ 6 B 20 % o f F u n d s = $ 3 B Ho w t h e S t r a t e g i c M o b i l i t y F o r m u l a W o r k s St a t e w i d e M o b i l i t y Re g i o n a l I m p a c t Di v i s i o n N e e d s Es t i m a t e d $ 1 5 B i n F u n d s f o r S F Y 2 0 1 6 - 2 0 2 5 Fo c u s Ad d r e s s S i g n i f i c a n t Co n g e s t i o n a n d B o t t l e n e c k s El i g i b l e P r o j e c t s - S t a t e w i d e t y p e P r o j e c t s (s u c h a s I n t e r s t a t e s ) • S e l e c t i o n b a s e d o n 1 0 0 % D a t a • P r o j e c t s P r o g r a m m e d p r i o r t o Lo c a l I n p u t R a n k i n g Fo c u s Im p r o v e Co n n e c t i v i t y w i t h i n R e g i o n s El i g i b l e P r o j e c t s - P r o j e c t s N o t S e l e c t e d i n St a t e w i d e M o b i l i t y C a t e g o r y - R e g i o n a l P r o j e c t s • S e l e c t i o n b a s e d o n 7 0 % D a t a & 3 0 % L o c a l I n p u t • F u n d i n g b a s e d o n p o p u l a t i o n wi t h i n R e g i o n Fo c u s Ad d r e s s L o c a l N e e d s El i g i b l e P r o j e c t s - P r o j e c t s N o t S e l e c t e d i n St a t e w i d e o r R e g i o n a l C a t e g o r i e s - D i v i s i o n P r o j e c t s • S e l e c t i o n b a s e d o n 5 0 % D a t a & 50 % L o c a l I n p u t • F u n d i n g b a s e d o n e q u a l s h a r e f o r ea c h D i v i s i o n ,W H P E $ W W D F K P H Q W 46 Re t u r n t o A g e n a d st a t e 40 % of re v e n u e or $6 . 4 bi l l i o n st a t e w i d e (o v e r 10 ye a r s ) • Ad d r e s s st a t e w i d e an d re g i o n a l l y si g n i f i c a n t co n g e s t i o n / b o t t l e n e c k s വ St a t e w i d e ON L Y വ Al l mo d e s co m p e t e (h w y an d no n Ͳhw y pr o j e c t s ) • 10 0 % da t a dr i v e n വ Be n e f i t Ͳco s t (r e d u c e d tr a v e l ti m e /p r o j e c t co s t s ) വ Ex i s t i n g co n g e s t i o n വ Ec o n o m i c co m p e t i t i v e n e s s വ Fr e i g h t വ Mu l t i Ͳmo d a l ,W H P E $ W W D F K P H Q W 47 Re t u r n t o A g e n a d • Ad d r e s s pr o j e c t s wi t h re g i o n a l l y si g n i f i c a n t im p a c t വ St a t e w i d e an d re g i o n a l ne e d s വ Pa i r e d di v i s i o n s : (1 & 4 ) , (2 & 3 ) , (5 & 6 ) , (7 & 9 ) , (8 & 1 0 ) , (1 1 & 1 2 ) , (1 3 & 1 4 ) വ Al l mo d e s co m p e t e • 70 % da t a ; 30 % lo c a l ra n k i n g വ Be n e f i t Ͳco s t വ Co n n e c t i v i t y വ Co n g e s t i o n വ Ec o n o m i c co m p e t i t i v e n e s s വ Sa f e t y re g i o n 40 % of re v e n u e or $6 . 4 bi l l i o n ov e r al l re g i o n s (o v e r 10 ye a r s ) ,W H P E $ W W D F K P H Q W 48 Re t u r n t o A g e n a d • Ad d r e s s lo c a l i z e d co n g e s t i o n & sa f e t y co n c e r n s դ Al l mo d e s co m p e t e • 50 % da t a ; 50 % lo c a l ra n k i n g വ Be n e f i t Ͳco s t വ Co n n e c t i v i t y വ Sh o u l d e r wi d t h വ Sa f e t y di v i s i o n Eq u a l sh a r e ov e r 14 di v i s i o n s . ,W H P E $ W W D F K P H Q W 49 Re t u r n t o A g e n a d NC D O T R e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s / C o m m i t m e n t s Al l h i g h w a y p r o j e c t s c u r r e n t l y l e t f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n t h r o u g h J u l y 1 , 20 1 5 w i l l n o t b e s u b j e c t t o p r i o r i t i z a t i o n Re c o m m e n d k e e p i n g p r i o r i t i z a t i o n t o a 2 y e a r c y c l e Re c o m m e n d f i r s t 5 y e a r s o f S F Y 2 0 1 6 - 2 0 2 5 W o r k P r o g r a m i s “c o m m i t t e d ” a f t e r s c o r e s a r e a p p l i e d Co m p l e t e t h e t e c h n o l o g y i m p r o v e m e n t s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h P 3 . 0 Pa r t n e r w i t h t h e W o r k G r o u p t o m a k e e x p e d i e n t d e c i s i o n s s u p p o r t i v e of l e g i s l a t i v e r e q u i r e m e n t s ,W H P E $ W W D F K P H Q W 50 Re t u r n t o A g e n a d Ec o n o m i c C o m p e t i v e n e s s NC D O T f o c u s r e m a i n s t h e s a m e : • Jo b s , J o b s , J o b s • 20 % w e i g h t m u s t b e m i n i m u m p e r c e n t a g e • Ex p l a n a t i o n m u s t b e s i m p l e r Pr o p o s e d S c o r i n g O p t i o n s : 1. 10 0 % b a s e d o n l o n g - t e r m j o b s c r e a t e d 2. 50 % b a s e d o n l o n g - t e r m j o b s c r e a t e d + 5 0 % b a s e d o n v a l u e a d d e d i n $ Ec o n o m i c A r e a c o u l d b e S t a t e o f N C , R e g i o n ( P a i r e d D i v i s i o n s ) , o r Si n g l e D i v i s i o n ( c a n v a r y w i t h f u n d i n g c a t e g o r y ) Sc o r i n g S c a l e # E x p e c t e d J o b s / 1 0 • Ex a m p l e : 7 7 0 j o b s c r e a t e d = 7 7 p o i n t s • Ex a m p l e : 5 4 0 j o b s c r e a t e d = 5 4 p o i n t s • 10 0 0 + j o b s c r e a t e d = 1 0 0 p o i n t s ( m a x ) TA C 5 / 8 / 2 0 1 3 A t t a c h m e n t 1 2 51 Re t u r n t o A g e n a d Ap r Pr i o r i t i z a t i o n 3 . 0 P r o p o s e d S c h e d u l e - R e v i s e d Ja n De c No v Se p t Au g Ma y Ma r Ja n De c J u l y M a r Fe b A p r J u n e Oc t F e b DO T Ca l c u l a t e s Qu a n t . Sc o r e s , &Pr o g r a m s ST W Mo b . Pr o j e c t s Su b m i t Ne w Pr o j e c t s MP O s / R P O s &Di v i s i o n s As s i g n Lo c a l In p u t Po i n t s DO T Fi n a l i z e s Sc o r e s an d De v e l o p s Dr a f t ST I P (r e l e a s e d by Ja n 1, 20 1 5 ) Dr a f t ST I P Co m m e n t Pe r i o d &Ai r Qu a l i t y An a l y s i s Fi n a l ST I P Ad o p t e d by Ju l y 1, 20 1 5 Sc o r e Ex i s t . Pr o j e c t s 20 1 4 2 0 1 5 20 1 3 De v e l o p P3 . 0 Ma y J u n e MP O s &RP O s Fo r m a l i z e Lo c a l Pr i o r i t i z a t i o n Al l Mo d e s Al l Mo d e s TA C 5 / 8 / 2 0 1 3 A t t a c h m e n t 1 2 52 Re t u r n t o A g e n a d Co u n t y T I P / W B S # D e s c r i p t i o n L e t D a t e Co m p l e t i o n Da t e St a t u s C o s t C o m m e n t s Or a n g e / Ch a p e l H i l l 43 7 4 5 In s t a l l a t i o n o f a t r a f f i c s i g n a l o n S R 1 7 5 0 ( E s t e s D r i v e ) a t L i b r a r y D r i v e ( n o n sy s t e m ) 4/ 1 / 1 3 Co m p l e t e e x c e p t Pe d . M o v e m e n t s - Pe n d i n g S i d e w a l k pr o j e c t $7 5 , 0 0 0 Sm a l l C o n s t r u c t i o n Fu n d s Or a n g e / Ca r r b o r o 43 6 8 7 To w n o f C a r r b o r o - R a d i u s i m p r o v e m e n t s , h i g h v i s i b i l i t y c r o s s w a l k s a n d pe d e s t r i a n r e f u g e i s l a n d a t t h e i n t e r s e c t i o n o f S R 1 0 0 9 ( Hi l l s b o r o u g h R o a d ) , Ja m e s S t r e e t ( n o n s y s t e m ) & Q u a i l R o o s t D r i v e ( n o n s y s t e m ) i n C a r r b o r o . TB D Di s t r i c t D e s i g n / Co n s t r u c t i o n Su m m e r 2 0 1 3 b y NC D O T W o r k Fo r c e s $4 0 , 0 0 0 Sm a l l C o n s t r u c t i o n Fu n d s Or a n g e / Ch a p e l H i l l U- 0 6 2 4 C 2 0 3 1 7 5 34 7 6 2 . 3 . 4 NC 8 6 ( S . C o l u m b i a S t , ) F r o m S R - 1 9 0 6 ( P u r e f o y R d ) t o S R 1 9 0 2 ( M a n n i n g Dr ) . W i d e n i n g , G r a d i n g , D r a i n a g e , P a v i n g & S i g n a l s 10 / 1 6 / 2 0 1 2 1 2 / 2 8 / 2 0 1 4 12 % C o m p l e t e 7% S c h e d u l e $4 , 5 6 5 , 1 4 7 T I P Or a n g e / Ca r r b o r o U- 2 8 0 3 C 2 0 3 0 2 8 34 8 6 0 . 3 . 1 W i d e n i n g o f S R 1 9 1 9 ( S m i t h L e v e l R o a d ) f r o m R o c k H a v e n R o a d t o B r i d g e # 88 o v e r M o r g a n C r e e k 12 / 1 8 / 2 0 1 2 5 / 1 4 / 2 0 1 5 2% C o m p l e t e 3% S c h e d u l e $4 , 9 4 6 , 1 9 7 T I P Or a n g e / Ch a p e l H i l l U- 3 3 0 6 C2 0 2 2 6 6 34 9 1 3 . 3 . S T 1 Gr a d i n g , D r a i n a g e , P a v i n g , S i g n a l s , C u r b , a n d G u t t e r a n d R e t a i n i n g W a l l s o n SR 1 7 3 3 ( W e a v e r D a i r y R o a d ) F r o m N C 8 6 t o O l d S t e r l i n g R o a d 7/ 2 0 / 2 0 1 0 6 / 1 5 / 2 0 1 3 82 % C o m p l e t e 86 % S c h e d u l e $9 , 5 8 4 , 8 8 6 A R R A / T I P Or a n g e W- 5 2 0 7 E 45 3 3 7 . 1 . 5 In s t a l l a t i o n o f a r o u n d a b o u t o n S R 1 7 3 4 ( E r w i n R d . ) a n d S R 1 7 9 1 ( M t . M o r i a h Rd . ) n e a r C h a p e l Hi l l TB D 1 0 / 1 / 2 0 1 3 R/ W a c q u i s i t i o n i n pr o g r e s s $4 5 0 , 0 0 0 Hi g h H a z a r d Sa f e t y Or a n g e / Ca r r b o r o W- 5 2 0 7 I 45 3 3 7 . 1 . 9 Fu n d s f o r p r e l i m i n a r y e n g i n e e r i n g o n S R 1 0 0 5 ( J o n e s F e r r y R o a d ) a n d D a v i e St r e e t ) TB D T B D D e s i g n i n p r o g r e s s $ 5 0 , 0 0 0 Hi g h H a z a r d Sa f e t y Or a n g e W - 5 3 1 8 C2 0 3 1 9 3 Ge o m e t r i c I m p r o v e m e n t , P a v e d S h o u l d e r s , R e s u r f a c i n g a n d R u m b l e S t r i p s on N C 8 6 f r o m N C 5 7 t o C a s w e l l C o . 2/ 1 9 / 2 0 1 3 1 0 / 3 1 / / 1 3 C o n t r a c t A w a r d e d $ 4 , 7 5 0 , 0 0 0 Hi g h H a z a r d Sa f e t y Or a n g e SS - 4 9 0 7 V 42 4 2 3 . 3 4 2 4 2 3 . 1 Re a l i g n i n t e r s e c t i o n o f S R 1 0 0 5 ( O l d G r e e n s b o r o R d . ) @ S R 1 9 5 1 ( W h i t e Cr o s s R d . ) TB D T B D Al t e r n a t e D e s i g n i n pr o g r e s s $1 9 8 , 0 0 0 S p o t S a f e t y - S t a t e Or a n g e / Ch a p e l H i l l S S - 4 9 0 7 A P 43 6 4 0 . 1 . 1 43 6 4 0 . 2 . 1 43 6 4 0 . 3 . 1 SS - 4 9 0 7 A P - O r a n g e - N C 8 6 ( M a r t i n L u t h e r K i n g J r . , B l v d . ) a n d S R 1 7 5 0 (E s t e s D r i v e ) i n C h a p e l Hi l l . I m p r o v e s i g h t d i s t a n c e b y c u t t i n g b a c k t h e ba n k in t h e n o r t h e a s t q u a d r a n t o f t h e i n t e r s e c t i o n . C y c l i s t s c a n n o t s e e t h e c a r s a t th e s t o p b a r a n d t h e m o t o r i s t s c a n n o t s e e t h e c y c l i s t s . TB D Di s t r i c t D e s i g n / NC D O T W o r k Fo r c e s $2 5 , 6 0 0 S p o t S a f e t y Co u n t y T I P # Lo c a t i o n D e s c r i p t i o n E s t . L e t D a t e Co m p l e t i o n Da t e St a t u s C o s t C o m m e n t s Or a n g e I - 5 3 1 2 M i l l & R e s u r f a c e I - 8 5 f r o m e a s t o f I - 4 0 t o t h e D u r h a m C ou n t y L i n e . 1 0 / 1 5 / 2 0 1 3 T B D Co n t r a c t do c u m e n t s pe n d i n g $4 , 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 T I P NC D O T P R O J E C T S C U R R E N T L Y I N 1 2 M O N T H L E T T N G L I S T AC T I V E N C D O T P R O J E C T S L O C A T E D I N D C H C M P O 4/ 3 / 2 0 1 3 ,W H P E 53 Re t u r n t o A g e n d a Co u n t y T I P / W B S # D e s c r i p t i o n L e t D a t e Co m p l e t i o n D a t e St a t u s C o s t C o m m e n t s Or a n g e / Hi l l s b o r o u g h C- 5 1 8 4 / 46 2 3 4 . 3 . 1 Ri v e r w a l k T r a i l P h a s e I I I - C o n s t r u c t a p a v e d o f f - r o a d t r a i l al o n g E n o R i v e r c o n n e c t i n g R i v e r P a r k , G o l d P a r k a n d th e O c c o n e e c h e e M o u n t a i n S t a t e N a t u r a l A r e a a n d co n s t r u c t s i d e w a l k t o p r o v i d e p e d e s t r i a n a n d b i c y c l e co n n e c t i o n s t o t h e G r e e n w a y . 3/ 1 4 T B D En g i n e e r i n g & R/ W 2 0 1 3 , Co n s t r u c t i o n 2 0 1 4 $6 1 0 , 0 0 0 C M A Q Du r h a m / Or a n g e EB - 4 7 0 7 A (O r a n g e ) / E B - 47 0 7 B (D u r h a m ) Bi c y c l e i m p r o v e m e n t s ( B i k e w a y a n d s i g n a l s ) o n D u r h a m / Ch a p e l H i l l ( S R 1 8 3 8 / S R 2 2 2 0 ) f r o m S R 1 1 1 6 ( G a r r e t t Ro a d ) i n D u r h a m C o u n t y t o U S 1 5 - 5 0 1 i n O r a n g e C o u n t y TB D T B D De l a y e d R / W t o FY 1 3 a n d Co n s t r u c t i o n t o F Y 14 / 1 5 t o a l l o w Ci t y t o s e c u r e in c r e a s e d f u n d i n g $4 , 9 0 0 , 0 0 0 Or a n g e / Ca r r b o r o EL - 4 8 2 8 / 40 2 4 5 . 1 . 1 & 40 2 4 5 . 3 . 1 De s i g n & c o n s t r u c t i o n o f m u l t i - u s e p e d e s t r i a n / b i c y c l e pa t h a l o n g M o r g a n C r e e k f r o m S m i t h L e v e l R o a d t o t h e We a t h e r h i l l P o i n t e n e i g h b o r h o o d & c o n s t r u c t a m u l t i - u s e pe d e s t r i a n / b i c y c l e p a t h a l o n g M o r g a n C r e e k f r o m S m i t h Le v e l r o a d w e s t t o t h e B e r r y h i l l N e i g h b o r h o o d . TB D T B D De l a y Co n s t r u c t i o n f r o m FY 1 2 t o F Y 1 3 / Pl a n n i n g & D e s i g n $4 8 0 , 0 0 0 ST P - D A ; MA w / T O C Or a n g e / Ch a p e l H i l l ER - 2 9 7 1 G 36 0 7 . 3 . 0 9 W i d e n r o a d w a y , i n s t a l l c u r b a n d g u t t e r a n d c o n s t r u c t si d e w a l k a l o n g S R 1 7 5 0 ( E s t e s D r i v e ) b e t w e e n B u r l a g e Ci r c l e a n d S R 1 0 1 0 ( F r a n k l i n S t r e e t ) TB D 8 / 1 / 1 3 Co n s t r u c t i o n au t h o r i z a t i o n co m p l e t e $2 0 0 , 0 0 0 Sm a l l Co n s t r u c t i o n / Di v i s i o n En h a n c e m e n t ; MA w / T O C H Or a n g e / Ch a p e l H i l l ER - 2 9 7 1 G 36 0 7 . 3 . 1 3 Co n s t r u c t s i d e w a l k s o n S R 1 9 0 0 ( M a s o n F a r m R o a d ) fr o m U S 1 5 / 5 0 1 ( F o r d h a m B l v d . ) t o H i g h l a n d W o o d s Ro a d TB D 8 / 1 / 1 3 En v i r o n m e n t a l Do c u m e n t ap p r o v e d $3 0 , 0 0 0 Di v i s i o n En h a n c e m e n t ; MA w / T O C H Or a n g e / Ca r r b o r o SR - 5 0 0 0 S 40 9 2 2 . 1 . 1 8 Ed u c a t i o n , e n c o u r a g e m e n t , e v a l u a t i o n , a n d ne i g h b o r h o o d o u t r e a c h f o r Ca r r b o r o E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l Pr o g r a m un d e r w a y $1 2 , 8 6 5 Sa f e R o u t e s t o Sc h o o l s ; M A w/ T O C Or a n g e / Ca r r b o r o SR - 5 0 0 1 A E Co n s t r u c t 8 7 0 l i n e a r f e e t o f 5 ' s i d e w a l k o n E l m S t r e e t fr o m e x i s t i n g s i d e w a l k n e a r W e a v e r S t r e e t t o S h e l t o n St r e e t i n C a r r b o r o 2/ 2 1 / 1 2 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 2 Co n s t r u c t i o n co m p l e t e ; F i n a l cl o s e o u t p e n d i n g $3 0 0 , 0 0 0 Sa f e R o u t e s t o Sc h o o l s ; M A w/ T O C Or a n g e / Ch a p e l H i l l / Ca r r b o r o SR - 5 0 0 1 A R Co n s t r u c t 3 2 0 ' o f 5 ' s i d e w a l k o n C u l b r e t h R o a d b e t w e e n Co b b l e r i d g e R d . i n C h a p e l H i l l a n d R o s s b u r n R d . i n Ca r r b o r o 4/ 1 2 / 1 2 1 / 3 1 / 1 3 9 5 % C o m p l e t e $5 0 , 0 0 0 SR T S / $ 1 0 8 , 0 0 0 ST P D A SR T S / S T P - D A ; MA w / T O C LO C A L G O V E R N M E N T A D M I N I S T E R E D P R O J E C T S L O C A T E D I N D C H C M P O 4/ 3 / 2 0 1 3 ,W H P E 54 Re t u r n t o A g e n d a Co u n t y T I P / W B S # D e s c r i p t i o n L e t D a t e Co m p l e t i o n D a t e St a t u s C o s t C o m m e n t s LO C A L G O V E R N M E N T A D M I N I S T E R E D P R O J E C T S L O C A T E D I N D C H C M P O Or a n g e / Ca r r b o r o U- 4 7 2 6 D C 36 2 6 8 . 3 . 4 W i l s o n P a r k M u l t i - U s e P a t h 6 / 7 / 1 2 1 1 / 2 6 / 1 2 Co n s t r u c t i o n co m p l e t e ; F i n a l cl o s e o u t p e n d i n g $1 2 9 , 4 3 1 ST P - D A ; MA w / T O C Or a n g e / Ca r r b o r o U- 4 7 2 6 D D Co n s t r u c t s i d e w a l k o n R o g e r s R o a d f r o m H o m e s t e a d Ro a d t o M e a d o w R u n C t . 10 / 3 1 / 1 3 4 / 3 0 / 1 4 D e s i g n u n d e r w a y $ 4 2 8 , 9 6 0 ST P - D A ; MA w / T O C Or a n g e / Ca r r b o r o U- 4 7 2 6 D E (r e p l a c e s E L - 49 9 4 ) Co n s t r u c t B o l i n C r e e k M u l t i - u s e P a t h f r o m H o m e s t e a d Ro a d t o C h a p e l H i l l H i g h S c h o o l TB D T B D D e s i g n u n d e r w a y $ 5 9 0 , 0 0 0 ST P - D A ; MA w / T O C Or a n g e / Ca r r b o r o U- 4 7 2 6 D F B i c y c l e d e t e c t i o n a t S i g n a l i z e d I n t e r s e c t i o n s T B D T B D D e s i g n u n d e r w a y $ 3 6 , 0 0 0 ST P - D A ; MA w / T O C Or a n g e / Ch a p e l H i l l U- 4 7 2 6 I F De s i g n a n d i n s t a l l s t a i r s f r o m t h e s i d e w a l k o n t h e n o r t h si d e o f F r a n k l i n S t . t o t h e B o l i n C r e e k T r a i l TB D T B D Su p p l e m e n t a l ag r e e m e n t t o re m o v e co n s t r u c t i o n ; T o w n to p a y f o r co n s t r u c t i o n $2 0 , 0 0 0 P E ST P - D A ; MA w / T O C H Or a n g e / Ch a p e l H i l l U- 4 7 2 6 I G Mo r g a n C r e e k T r a i l P h a s e 2 - C o n s t r u c t 1 0 ' w i d e gr e e n w a y f r o m e x i s t i n g F a n B r a n c h T r a i l n e a r C u l b r e t h Rd . a n d U S 1 5 / 5 0 1 t o P h a s e I 11 / 1 / 1 3 Su b m i t t a l s ap p r o v e d ; Co n s t r u c t i o n t o be g i n t h i s s p r i n g $1 , 3 1 0 , 0 0 0 / ad d i t i o n a l f u n d s $1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 8 / 1 2 ST P - D A ; MA w / T O C H 4/ 3 / 2 0 1 3 ,W H P E 55 Re t u r n t o A g e n d a ,W H P E 56 Re t u r n t o A g e n d a