Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
OUTBoard agenda 022013
AGENDA Orange Unified Transportation Board February 20, 2013 7:00p.m. You can bring your laptops/tablets if you would like to use them. Hard copies of the agenda packetwill still be mailedfor this meeting. Conference Room 004 (LowerFloor) OrangeCounty West Campus 131 West Margaret Lane, Hillsborough Time Item Page Title 7:001. 2. Call to Order and Roll Call Introduction of guests: Matthew Day, Senior Planner, TARPO; and Scott Walston, PE, NCDOTTransportation Planning Branch 7:03 7:04 3. 4. 3-8 Approval of Minutes Minutes from January 16, 2013 Consideration of Additions to the Agenda 7:055. 9-28 Regular Agenda January 24, 2013 Public hearing Draft of Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) http://www.ncdot.gov/doh/preconstruct/tpb/planning/ orangecounty.html x Copy of Draft CTP sent to OUTBoard on 02/06/2013 (please bring this copy to the OUTBoard meeting on 02/20/2013) x Abstractproviding history, background, and intro to CTP x Highway Map and Projects (Attachment 1) x Public Transportation and Rail Map and Projects (Attachment 2) x Bicycle Map and Projects (Attachment 3) x Pedestrian Map and Projects (Attachment 4) x Draft CTP Adoption Map (Attachment 5) x OUTBoard and Staff Draft CTP Comments (Attachment 6) x BOCC CTP Public Hearing Comments (Attachment 7) ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS FOR REFERENCE: x Composite CountywideBicycle Map (Attachment 8) x Proposed Orange County Rural Connectivity Pedestrian Plan (Attachment 9) OUTBoard Action:To make a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners for consideration at its March 7, 2013 meeting. 1 Time 8:15 Item 6. Page 29-31 Title Staff Updates a.Update on Orange County Master Aging Plan 2012-2017 transportation strategies (Alex Castro) b.Update on BOCC reviewofa second County comment letter to NCDOT Rail Division regardingthe three proposed railroad private crossing closures in Orange County. Relateddocuments: http://orangecountync.gov/planning/RRCrossingClosure.asp c. Update on NCDOT Annual Statement for 2012 secondary road construction (Attachment 10). d.Update on proposed Mebane and Gibsonville Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans e.2013 BG MPO TAC Commissioner Appointments from Orange County (Barry Jacobs and Earl McKee) f.2013 DCHC MPO TAC Commissioner Appointments from Orange County(Alice Gordonand Bernadette Pelissier) g.2013 TARPO RTAC Commissioner Appointments from Orange County(Renee Price and Bernadette Pelissier) h.NCDOT new appointments to the Board of Transportation i.TARPO updates from Matt Day j.Specifics on roundabout project from DCHClist provided at January 16thmeeting (to answer questions raised by Board members) k.BOCC’s 2013 Boards and Commissions Work Session held onJanuary 29, 2013 and was attended by Paul Guthrie, Jeff Charles, and Ted Triebel. OUTBoard Action: Receive updates 8:40 8:45 7. 8. Board Members’ Discussion of Areas of Special Interest OUTBoard Action: Finalization oflist of members’ areas of special interest and assignments for monitoring other boards’ websites and/or agendas for transportation related information and activities Upcoming AgendaItems of Interest on Other Regional Transportation Related Board Agendas OUTBoard Action: Receive informationas a handout 8:509. Listing of Items for March20, 2013 Meeting a. Next steps for implementing the Bus and Rail Investment Plan (Craig Benedict) b.Update on BOCC consideration ofComprehensive Transportation Plan c. Next steps for Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Plan adoption and implementation d. Update on BG MPO activities e. Update on DCHC MPO activities f. Update on TARPO activities OUTBoard Action: Receive information 8:5510. Board Comments OUTBoard Action: Receive comments 9:0011.Adjournment 2 D R A F T MINUTES1 ORANGE UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION BOARD2 JANUARY 16,20133 4 5 MEMBERS PRESENT: Paul Guthrie, Chapel Hill Township;Jeff Charles, Bicycle Advocate; Alex Castro, Bingham 6 Township; Sam Lasris, Cedar Grove Township;Susie Enoch, Cheeks Township; Ted Triebel, Little River Township; 7 Jeff Miles, Pedestrian Access & Safety Advocate; Annette Jurgelski, Eno Township8 9 10 MEMBERS ABSENT: Alan Campbell, Planning Board Representative; Bryant Warren, Hillsborough Township; Amy 11 Cole, Transit Advocate;Economic Development Commission -Vacant; CfE Representative-Vacant; 12 13 14 STAFF PRESENT:Abigaile Pittman, Transportation/Land UsePlanner;Tina Love, Administrative Assistant II15 16 17 OTHERS PRESENT:Matthew Day, TARPO18 19 20 AGENDA ITEM I: CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL21 22 Staff, new member introductions 23 24 25 AGENDA ITEM II: APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 19,201226 27 The OUTBoard minutes were approved by concensus.28 29 30 AGENDA ITEM III: CONSIDERATIONS OF ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA31 32 Alex Castro: I would like to report transportationrelated issues related to the County Master Aging Plan when we get 33 toitem 6.34 35 AbigailePittman: That is on the agenda for next month, could we save it until then?36 37 38 AGENDA ITEM IV: REGULAR AGENDA39 January 24, 2013 Public hearing Draft of Comprehensive Transportation Plan 40 (CTP) http://www.ncdot.gov/doh/preconstruct/tpb/planning/ orangecounty.html41 OUTBoard Action:The OUTBoard recommended the draft CTP maps to the BOCC at 42 its September 21, 2011 meeting. This item is primarily a review in preparation for 43 OUTBoard recommendation on the Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) at its 44 February meeting.45 46 Abigaile Pittman: Reviewed the “Draft Orange County Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP)”. 47 48 Alex Castro: Under “Collected current traffic data August 2010-October 2010”, when is current traffic data not 49 considered current anymore?50 51 Paul Guthrie: One thing about that section on methodology points outisthat the baseline data was adjusted for the 52 slowdown in the economy over a period of years before 2007-2010 so they did additional statisticalworkto make 53 sure it showed a realistic line of changes and not just a current point in timedata.54 55 3 ReturntoAgenda D R A F T Matthew Day:I would add that the analysis done in terms of figuring out the needs is based on that future projected 56 traffic volume so to a certain extent it doesn’t matter which base you use it matters what they are projected for in the 57 2040 plan.58 59 Ted Triebel: This is a non-issue, right?60 61 Paul Guthrie: I think they made the adjustments in the base because when you make a projection you are starting 62 somewhere. 63 64 Abigaile Pittman: Continued review of Attachment 2. One of the most controversial items in the plan was the project 65 proposal regarding the NC 86 Expressway.66 67 Sam Lasris: Is it being left asanexpressway or being changed?68 69 Abigaile Pittman: It is being left as expressway. To change that would be a long process. DOT was looking at the 70 whole strategic highway program. Matt,pleasetell uswhat you know.71 72 Matthew Day: They will be looking at the whole plan over the next two years. One of the ideas being floated is to 73 remove the whole issue of pre-existing designations. If they do that then the whole issue will go away.74 75 Abigaile Pittman: Matt, you also previously made the comment that the traffic count on Highway 86 would never be 76 great enough to call that an expressway.77 78 Paul Guthrie: The word “expressway” takes on a meaning beyond what was going to happen to the road and it 79 scares people. These bring different feelings to people. I think working away from these labelsand talking more 80 about what the facility is supposed to do would be very healthy.81 82 Abigaile Pittman: I wanted to show our progress todateon the CTP. We have a final draft of the CTP now and we 83 are looking at adopting it. We will be reviewing two of the primary maps and related project proposals here tonight. If 84 you will look at the Highway map on the back side, there areproblem statements (descriptions)fromthe report. 85 86 Matthew Day: Even though NCDOT doesn’tadopt the Problem Statements, if a project gets funded, this is where 87 they start.88 89 Sam Lasris: I am wondering why the recycling center on Walnut Grove Church Road is not identified as an area of 90 problems.91 92 Abigaile Pittman: We are here to collect those comments and in February we will pass them on the BOCC for them 93 to consider.(Reviewed major projects).94 95 Abigaile Pittman: The Problem Statement (description) for North Efland Cedar Grove Road from Highland Farm 96 Road to Carr Store Road was read.97 98 Sam Lasris: Just one tenth of a mile beyond Carr Store where this ends is the Post Office which everyone stops to 99 turn off to. We should go to the Post Office with the widening.100 101 Ted Triebel: When I read ‘straightening of the roadway as needed’, who is the one to say what is needed?102 103 Sam Lasris: From Highland Farm Road to Carr is it all curves. The decision maker is NCDOT.104 105 Abigaile Pittman: Mebane Oaks Road from NC54 to Alamance County is currently a two-lane 22 foot cross section 106 the CTP proposal is to provide a 24-foot cross section with wide shoulders and turn lanes where needed.107 108 Jeff Charles: What is the definition of a wide shoulder?109 110 4 ReturntoAgenda D R A F T MatthewDay: The CTP report hasstandard cross sectionsin the appendix. 111 112 Jeff Charles: We need to make sure the maps are coordinatedwith the descriptions and the appendix. 113 114 Matthew Day: The cross section in the report is for 11-foottravel lanes and four-foot paved shoulders and a45 mph 115 speed limit.116 117 Abigaile Pittman: For this project it is four-foot wide paved shoulders.Next, the Old NC 86 from Arthur Minis Road to 118 Davis Roadproject. Why don’t we make a recommendation thatthe project descriptions include the four-foot wide 119 paved shoulders described in the appendix? There was general concurrence from the Board members. 120 121 Abigaile Pittman: The next map is the Public Transportation and Rail map.There are currently no rail facilities in the 122 TARPO area. 123 124 Paul Guthrie: How far out is the map looking at?125 126 Abigaile Pittman: 2040.127 128 Paul Guthrie: All of the discussion from the last three years of potential rail and 15-20 years has not been all covered 129 in this map because one of the options was an Efland drop-off station.130 131 Abigaile Pittman: That location is in the MPOarea. 132 133 Paul Guthrie: My point is that at least the way this goes, there is no need to worry about rail in the rest of the county. 134 Feeding a rail system that is 20 years out will need to have a series of serious discussions about feeder units to get 135 people to the rail units.136 137 Abigaile Pittman: Bus routes are next.138 139 Paul Guthrie: Most of the secondary paved road systems in the county were put together between 1948 and 1955 140 and the only area I see significant attention to isthe bridges. I saw nothingfromany of the meetings about the long 141 term maintenance and upgrade problems that will occur increasingly. Should that have been mentioned? 142 143 Matthew Day: That is not something handled in the CTP. They don’t get into bridges or maintenance. And bridge 144 maintenance has a totally separate process which is formula driven.145 146 Abigaile Pittman: Matt, as the representative of TARPO, is there anything you would like to contribute?147 148 Matthew Day: My main goal tonight was to come hear your concerns. We are here to provide advice and to listen.149 150 151 AGENDA ITEM V: STAFF UPDATES152 a.Status of Burlington-Graham Metropolitan Planning Organization (BG MPO) 153 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) including Orange County 154 b.January 7th and January 14th public meetings were held by NCDOT for the three proposed 155 railroad private crossing closures in Orange County. Related 156 documents: http://orangecountync.gov/planning/RRCrossingClosure.asp157 c.DCHC MPO CTP Next Steps and the 2040 MTP Next Steps158 d.DCHC MPO project status list 159 e.NCDOT revised SPOT process, the funding for transportation projects, and the revised 160 timeline 161 f.Specifics on projects from TARPO list provided at December 19th meeting (to answer 162 questions raised by Board members) BOCC’s 2013 Boards and Commissions Work 163 Session scheduled for January 29, 2013 at 7:00 p.m. at the Southern Haman Services 164 Center, 2401 Homestead Road, Chapel Hill165 5 ReturntoAgenda D R A F T OUTBoard Action: Receive updates166 167 168 Abigaile Pittman: Item 5a, we are still trying to finalize this. Mebane held up the process because they wanted more 169 weighted votes. This wasn’t based on the 2010 Census and their population has increased. The boundaries cannot 170 be finalized until the MOU is signed. It was heard by the TCC yesterday and they recommended they change the 171 weighted votesbased on the population of the 2010 census. It went to the TAC and they tabled it until March.172 173 Abigaile Pittman: Item 5b, workshops wereheavily attended. The first workshop was for Greenbrier and Gordon 174 Thomas,most people were generally accepting and at the second workshop in Byrdsville, they were screaming in 175 opposition. Multiple Commissioners were at each one and planning staff was there also. We had an original 176 comment letter from Orange County of an analysis of planning issues and transportation and now based on a 177 comment letter we received from NCDOTaddressing our initial concerns and the additional public comments, we 178 have a second letter going out with further comments. Everything we have to date is on the transportation website if 179 you would like to review it. I have been unofficially advised that the State Legislaturemay be entering the discussion.180 181 Annette Jurgelski: I read about this in the News of Orange. Are the railroad crossings on private land?182 183 Abigaile Pittman: They are private rail crossings.184 185 Annette Jurgelski: If they are private crossings, are they not on private land?186 187 Paul Guthrie: Not at the right of way.188 189 Annette Jurgelski: Why would one group endorse it and another opposeit?190 191 Abigaile Pittman: The Byrdsvillegroup … there are multiple lakes up by the crossing with a grouping of nicer homes 192 and they have always been oriented to NC 10 and below them is the ByrdsvilleMobile Home park which is a different 193 type of subdivision and they don’t want to have to go through that to get out because they said their property values 194 would be destroyed if they were identified with the mobile home park.195 196 Paul Guthrie: Did they offer a solution?197 198 Abigaile Pittman: One solution was to go west of the lakes into the Joppa Oaks subdivision which they say is a much 199 better socio-economic solution for their property values, this route would take them out to NC 86. Anothersolution is 200 proposed because the NCDOT public road standards are proposedto end before they get into the mobile home park, 201 they are proposing to leave that as a big private lane that connects to the west where Duke Forest starts with public 202 road.So the opposing property owners are suggesting that they make a public road through the mobile home park, 203 which would make this a 60 foot wide right-of-way through the mobile home park. This would wipe out a number of204 the mobile homes because the lots are so narrow and they thought this would be another way to address their 205 concerns, however, planning staff has noted that these mobile homes are not on permanent foundations and can be 206 moved back to allow for a new public road. 207 208 Paul Guthrie: What is the terrain like at the crossing?209 210 Abigaile Pittman: It is a slight hill.211 212 Paul Guthrie: And the track is up high and the road on either side is low.213 214 6 ReturntoAgenda D R A F T Abigaile Pittman: The kids in the mobile home park catch the bus on NC10. The road as it would come north of 215 Duke Forest wouldcreate double frontage lots for the Joppa Oaksresidents and wipe out their storage shedsand 216 fencingin the back so they these concerns.OnGordon Thomas on Pashall Drive there are two familygroups on 217 either end of the proposed new route that do not entirely agree with one another.218 219 Paul Guthrie: The reason I pushed this was because this will be a recurring event along that railroad line over the 220 next 20 years because all those surface crossings of those rails will be eliminated one way or another so we should 221 watch how this goes.222 223 Abigaile Pittman: In January, the TCC Sub-committee is reviewing and commenting on the MTP process and TRM224 (Triangle Regional Model). 225 226 Abigaile Pittman: Item 5c, Reviewed handout.227 228 Jeff Charles:Is part of this list on page 7 of 8, third down “Bicycle protection at signalized intersections”? I was 229 talking with Paul before the meeting about having Chuck Edwards come in to talk with us about this. I think that is a 230 generic problem in Orange County where we need to start talking to the NCDOT engineers about getting a bicycle 231 detection system.232 233 Abigaile Pittman: If you see a project and you would beinterested in seeing the detailed plans, let me know.234 235 Paul Guthrie: In the past, we have had Chuck Edwards in to talk about some things so we may want to accumulate 236 some issues. 237 238 Jeff Charles: On page 7, “Installation of a roundabout on Erwin Road and Mt. Moriah Road”, it is really needed but I 239 am thinking about the roundabout on 751 and Erwin takes up a lot of space and it is pretty small. How do you do that 240 at that intersection?241 242 Abigaile Pittman: Would you like me to get the plans for you?243 244 Jeff Charles: I would be interested in seeing that.245 246 Sam Lasris: Do you consider any of these items to be controversial that may need backup?247 248 Abigaile Pittman: I have talkedwith NancyCole Baker about the Safe Routes to School Action Planand the staff has 249 some initial steps outlined. I can invite Nancy to come to the meetingwhen we start discussing the Plan. 250 251 252 AGENDA ITEM VI: BOARD MEMBERS’DISCUSSION OF AREAS OF SPECIAL INTEREST253 OUTBoard Action:Development of a list of members’ areas of special interest and 254 assignments for monitoring other boards’ websites and/or agendas for transportation 255 related information and activities.256 257 Abigaile Pittman: I would like for you to write your name under the websites that need to be monitored for obvious 258 information that is listed to be shared.259 260 Paul Guthrie: I looked at the two websites listed by my name and the items that are listed as current will probably not 261 be something we want to get involved in. Sometimes it is a little hard to figure out what is going on.262 263 Jeff Charles: There are items that we want to be involved in.264 265 Alex Castro: We don’t have to individually report but we can send the information to Abigaile for a combined report.266 267 Jeff Charles: I will put myself on the list for the Commission for the Environment.268 7 ReturntoAgenda D R A F T 269 270 AGENDA ITEM VII: UPCOMING AGENDA ITEMS OF INTEREST ON OTHER REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION RELATED 271 BOARD AGENDAS:272 OUTBoard Action:Receive information273 274 Abigaile Pittman: I made a list of all the upcoming meetings that are coming up. 275 276 Alex Charles: The Department on Aging has submitted to the DOT a request for the grant of the creation of a 277 Mobility Management position. There will be an individual within the department to handle transportation related 278 issues.279 280 Paul Guthrie: We need to pay attention to is how that transportation resource is able to operate and will it have more 281 constraints that it has now.282 283 284 AGENDA ITEM VIII: LISTING OF ITEMS FOR FEBRUARY 20,2013MEETING285 a.Review of CTP Bicycle Map286 b.Review of CTP Pedestrian Map287 c.Update on Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Plan adoption and implementation288 d.Update on the BOCC’s 1-29 Boards and Commissions Work Session289 e.Update on BG MPO activities290 f.Update on DCHC MPO activities291 g.Update on NCDOT Annual Statement for 2012 secondary road construction292 h.Update on OC Master Aging Plan 2012-2017 transportation strategies 293 i.Update on next steps for implementing the Bus and Rail Investment Plan294 OUTBoard Action:Receive information295 296 297 AGENDA ITEM IX: BOARD COMMENTS298 299 300 AGENDA ITEM X: ADJOURNMENT301 302 The meeting was adjourned by consensus.303 304 305 Items for future meetings:306 x Sam Lasris asked if there a road planned to connect 57 and 86 to the school.307 x Send CTP next steps information out via email to board members.308 x “Installation of a roundabout on Erwin Road and Mt. Moriah Road” – Jeff Charles would like to see the 309 plans.310 x Abigaile to send the OUTBoard group email addresses so the members can be in contact with the other 311 members.312 313 8 ReturntoAgenda ORANGE COUNTY ORANGE UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION BOARD ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date:February 20, 2013 Action Agenda Item No.1 SUBJECT:Draft Orange County Comprehensive Transportation Plan DEPARTMENT:Planning and Inspections PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N)No ATTACHMENT(S): 1.CTP Highway Map & Projects 2.CTP Public Trans/Rail Map & Projects 3.CTP Bicycle Map & Projects 4.CTP Pedestrian Map & Projects 5.CTP Adoption Map 6.OUTBoard and Staff Draft CTP Comments and Recommendations 7.BOCC CTP Public Hearing Comments ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS FOR REFERENCE 8.Composite Bicycle Map 9.Draft Rural Connectivity Plan INFORMATION CONTACTS: Tom Altieri, 245-2579 Abigaile Pittman, 245-2567 Craig Benedict, 245-2592 PURPOSE: To make a recommendation to the Board of County Commissionerson the draft Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) for Orange County’s rural areas. BACKGROUND: Orange County approved a resolution in June 2009 endorsing completion of a CTP for rural Orange County. The study is being completed through a coordinated effort among the Orange Unified Transportation Board(OUTBoard), Orange County planning staff, Triangle Area Rural Planning Organization(TARPO),Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization(DCHC MPO), and the North CarolinaDepartment of Transportation (NCDOT).NCDOT Staff will attend the meeting to present the draft CTP and provide a summary of the planning process. WHAT IS THE CTP?:The CTP consists of a technical report (provided under separate cover) andfour maps: 1) Highway (Attachment 1); 2) Public Transportationand Rail (Attachment 2); 3) Bicycle (Attachment 3); and 4) Pedestrian (Attachment 4).There is also an Adoption Map which contains the adoption details of the CTP (Attachment 5). It is not fiscally constrained and incorporates local interests, community goals, and statewide needs in a common multi-modal plan. 9 ReturntoAgenda WHAT AREA DOES THE CTP COVER?: The draft Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) covers the rural portionsof the County, generally defined as the area outside of Carrboro, Chapel Hill, Hillsborough, and Mebane(See attached maps for specifics). PROCESS:A Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) Steering Committee, comprised of representatives of aforementionedgroups, including the OUTBoardhascoordinated to complete the draft. The following tasks have been completed: x Held a public workshop to kick off the process (September 2009) x Conducted an on-line public survey (October – November 2009); Collected current traffic data and projected future traffic (August 2010– October 2010) x Analyzed traffic growth rates to use in final data projections (November 2010) x Prepared a highwaydeficiency analysis (November – December 2010) x Held a public input meeting on the deficiency analysis (February 2011) x Developedalternatives and draft recommendationsfor all modes (March-August 2011) x Held public drop in session and collected County advisory board input (September 2011) x Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) received draft CTP maps and provided input (October 2011) x OUTBoard recommends CTP maps to BOCC for public hearing (September 2011) x Project delayed to rectify boundaries between the Burlington-Graham and Durham- Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organizations(January 2012 – November 2012. x Orange County Planning staff reviewed a rough draft of the CTP report and provided comments to NCDOT Transportation Planning Branch staff (December 2012). x NCDOT Transportation Planning Branch staffrevised draft Plan for public hearing (January 2013). x OUTBoard receives primer on draft CTPfrom Orange County Planning staffand initial comments are provided on Highway Map and Public Transportation/Rail Map and Projects (January 2013). These Initial draft comments and recommendations are included in Attachment 6. January 24, 2012 BOCC Public Hearing – The Orange County BOCCheld a public hearing on the draft CTP January 24th. Three citizens spoke at the hearing. Meeting notes are included in Attachment 7. Additional Reference Materials - Two additional attachments have been provided for reference in reviewing the CTP Bicycle Map and Pedestrian Map. A Composite Bicycle Map (Attachment 8) was prepared by Planning Staff to depict the connectivity of proposed bicycle paths throughout the County, in rural and urban areas. A Draft Rural Connectivity Planfor Orange County (Attachment 9)was developed by a subcommittee of the CTP Steering Committee, and the off-road trailson the Pedestrian Map are consistent with this county-wide plan. NEXT STEPS – Following tonight’s recommendation on the 113 page CTP, Orange County will consider adoption in two parts: Part 1, adoption of Sheets 1-5 (4 Mapsplus the Adoption Map), as provided in Attachments 1, 2,3, 4, and 5; and 10 ReturntoAgenda Part 2, adoption of the technical report (provided under separate cover).It should be noted that Sheets 1-5 (Attachments 1-5)can also be found withinthe technical report, albeit ata smaller, 8.5 x 11 page size. Following is the anticipated schedule and sequence of events: 1.Orange Unified Transportation Board formal recommendationson Parts 1 and 2 (February 2013); 2.BOCC considerationof Part 1 (March 2013); 3.TARPOendorsementof Part 1 (Spring 2013); 4.NCDOT Transportation Planning Branch staff recommendationof Part 1to NCDOT Board of Transportation (Spring 2013); 5.NCDOT Board of Transportation adopts only Part 1 (Spring 2013); 6.NCDOT Transportation Planning Branch distributes the technical report for external reviewby other staff within NCDOT (local contacts and modal contacts), a designated member of NCDOT Board of Transportation, TARPO, and Orange County(any comments collected are to be forwarded to the BOCC); 7.NCDOT Transportation Planning Branch staff finalizes the report and distributes the final document including previously adopted Map Sheets; and 8.BOCC consideration of Part 2 (May-June 2013). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Additional information about the CTP can be found online at: http://www.ncdot.org/~tpb/planning/orangecounty.html PROCEDURALINFORMATION: Any evidence not presented at the public hearing must be submitted in writing prior to the OUTBoard’s recommendation. Additional oral evidence may be considered bythe OUTBoard only if it is for the purpose of presenting information also submitted inwriting. Thepublic hearing was adjourned untilMarch 7, 2013 in order to receive the OUTBoard’s recommendation and any submitted written comments. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Other than the cost of legal advertisement and staff time, there is no financial impact associated with receiving the draft CTP and conducting the public hearing. This work is being completed by existing Planning staff in the Department’s Comprehensive Planning Division with assistance from the NCDOT Transportation Planning Branch. Although the Comprehensive Planning Division, which includes the County’s primary Transportation Planner, has undergone some turnover, a request to re-hire is in process. RECOMMENDATION(S):The Planning Directorrecommends the Board: 1.Deliberate as necessary on the draft Comprehensive Transportation Plan (Technical Report delivered under separate cover and Attachments 1-5). 2.Consider draft OUTBoard commentsand recommendations (Attachment 6), adding any that may be desired by the Board; and 3.Make a recommendation to the BOCC on the proposed draft Comprehensive Transportation Plan in time for the March 7, 2013 BOCC meeting. 11 ReturntoAgenda 86 54 57 49 157 O r a n g e G ro v e R d (S R 1006) Old Greensb or o Rd (SR 10 0 5 ) Dodsons Cross Rd (SR 1102) N e w S h a r o n C h urc h R d (S R 1 5 38) W i l k e r s o n R d ( S R 1507) HighRock R d (SR1340) M o u n t W i lli n g R d (S R 1120) B u c k h o r n Rd (SR 1114 ) C a rr S t ore R d(SR1004) M ill C r e e k Rd (SR1343) Schle y R d (SR1548) Lynch StoreRd(SR1364) L ittle River Church Rd (SR 1543) H ig hla n d F ar m R d ( S R 1332) Arthur Minnis Rd (S R 1 1 1 5 /1 1 13)Old NC 86(SR 1009) HollyRidg e R d(S R 1524) C a r r S t o r e R d (S R 1 3 5 2 ) Mebane Oaks Rd (SR 100 7) W aln utGroveChurch R d (SR 10 01) B r a d s h a w Q u a r r y R d (S R 1 1 1 5 ) WhiteCrossRd (SR1951) Efland-Cedar Grove R d (SR 100 4/ 1 3 5 7 ) Dai r ylandRd(SR 1177) C o r b e tt R i d g e R d ( S R 1 0 0 4) S a w m i l l R d (S R 1 5 4 5) MorrowMill R d (S R 1 9 5 8 ) Cra w f o rd D air y R d ( SR 1 9 56) O r a nge Chapel C l o ver Garden R d ( SR1956) J o n es F e r r y R d (S R 1 9 4 2 ) OakGrov e C h u r c h R d ( S R 1117) Durham-Chapel Hill- Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization Burlington-Graham Metropolitan Planning Organization A l a m a n c e C o u n t y C a s w e l l C o u n t y P e r s o n C o u n t y D u r h a m C o u n t y C h a t h a m C o u n t y Orange County Comprehensive Transportation Plan Highway Map q 01234 MilesExisting Needs Improvement Recommended Freeways Existing Needs Improvement Recommended Expressways Existing Needs Improvement Recommended Boulevards Existing Needs Improvement Recommended Other Major Thoroughfares Existing Needs Improvement Recommended Minor Thoroughfares Existing Grade Separation Proposed Grade Separation Existing Interchange Proposed Interchange DRAFT Figure 1 Sheet 2 of 5 Refer to CTP document for more details Base map date: April, 2009 Plan date: December 11, 2012 12 Attachment1 Att a c h m e n t 1 12ReturntoAgenda +,*+:$<352-(&7'(6&5,37,216)5207+(&737(&+1,&$/5(3257 NC 54 (Orange Grove Road to Neville Road/DCHC MPO), Local ID ORAN0002-H: NC 54 from Orange Grove Road (SR 1006) to Neville Road (SR 1945) (the DCHC MPO boundary) is projected to exceed Level of Service (LOS) D by 2035. Improvements are needed in order to relieve anticipated congestion and to maintain a minimum LOS D on the existing facility. This section of NC 54 is currently a 2-lane, 24-foot undivided cross section, with a continuous center turn lane in some segments. The CTP project proposal is to provide a 4-lane divided cross section for this facility. The addition of a median will allow for better access control, thereby providing higher mobility for the facility. NC 86 (Coleman Loop Road/DCHC MPO to Caswell County), Local ID ORAN0001-H: NC 86 from Coleman Loop Road (SR 1334) (the DCHC MPO boundary) to Walnut Grove Church Road (SR 1001) is projected to exceed Level of Service (LOS) D by 2035. Improvements are needed in order to relieve anticipated congestion and to maintain a minimum LOS D on the existing facility. In addition, NC 86 throughout northern Orange County is identified as a recommended expressway on the Strategic Highway Corridor Vision Plan, in order to maintain regional and statewide mobility and connectivity. This section of NC 86 is currently a 2-lane, 24-foot undivided cross section. The CTP project proposal is to provide a 4-lane divided expressway cross section for this facility from Coleman Loop Road (SR 1334) (the DCHC MPO boundary) to Caswell County. This includes the section of NC 86 that is concurrent with NC 49. The conversion to an expressway is consistent with the Strategic Highway Corridors Vision Plan. Refer to the draft DCHC MPO 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and CTP for the preferred concept for NC 86, which will connect this CTP project segment to I-40 with a consistent expressway cross section around the Town of Hillsborough. The CTP was temporarily delayed in the spring of 2010 due to local concerns with this project proposal and the Strategic Highway Corridors designation. However, while traffic on NC 86 is still projected to exceed capacity, CTP traffic projectionsto 2035 do not warrant a full expressway cross section within the planning horizon of this CTP. Ultimately, it was decided to move forward with the CTP, including this project proposal, with the understanding that the proposed cross section is ultimately driven by vision and not yet by traffic. NC 86 will be improved as needed, with the ultimate vision of an expressway. As with all projects, any improvements to NC 86 must also be submitted and programmed through NCDOT’s Project Prioritization process in order to enter project development. This project proposal overlaps with NCDOT project W-5318 to provide geometric improvements, paved shoulders, and rumble strips to NC 86 from NC 57 (inside the DCHC MPO) to the Caswell County line. NCDOT project W-5318 is scheduled to begin right-of-way in January, 2012 and construction in January, 2013. Buckhorn Road Extension, Local ID ORAN0008-H:Buckhorn Road (SR 1114) and Dairyland Road (SR 1177) are currently primary choices for travel in southwest Orange County. However, the two roadways are discontinuous at their shared intersection with Orange Grove Road (SR 1006),another primary carrier throughout the area. The CTP project proposal is to provide a new location 2-lane cross section at Orange Grove Road (SR 1006) to extend Buckhorn Road (SR 1114) (ORAN0004-H) into Dairyland Road (SR 1177). This will provide better connectivity and improve traffic flow for this area of the county. Little River Church Road Extension, Local ID ORAN0005-H: Northern Orange County contains very few options for continuous east-west travel beyond the primary route along Carr Store Road (SR1004 / SR 1352), Sawmill Road (SR 1545), and Little River Church Road (SR 1543). However, Sawmill Road (SR 1545) and Little River Church Road (SR 1543) are discontinuous at their shared intersection with Walnut Grove Church Road (SR 1001). The CTP projectproposal is to provide a new location 2-lane cross section at Walnut Grove Church Road (SR 1001) to extend Little River Church Road (SR 1543) into Sawmill Road (SR 1545). This will provide better east-west continuity and connectivity for this area of the county. Minor Improvements Not all of the following facilities are projected to exceed Level of Service (LOS) D by2035, but improvements such as turn lanes, minor widening, and/or surfacing are idealfor better mobility and more streamlined facilities as growth occurs. Arthur Minnis Road (SR 1115), Local ID ORAN0003-H:Arthur Minnis Road(SR 1115) from Dodsons Cross Road (SR 1102) to Rocky Ridge Road / ArthurMinnis Road (SR 1113) is currently an unsurfaced, 20-foot cross section. TheCTP project proposal is to provide a surfaced, 24-foot cross section suitable forpublic traffic use. The CTP committee identified the importance of this facility foreast-west connectivity in this area of the county. Buckhorn Road (SR 1114), Local ID ORAN0004-H:Buckhorn Road (SR 1114)from Orange Grove Road (SR 1006) to Bradshaw Quarry Road (SR 1115) iscurrently an unsurfaced, 20-foot cross section. The CTP project proposal is toprovide a surfaced, 24-foot cross section suitable for public traffic use. The CTPcommittee identified the importance of this facility for north-south connectivity inthis area of the county. (North) Efland-Cedar Grove Road (SR 1004), SPOT ID # 559:Efland-CedarGrove Road (SR 1004) from Highland Farm Road (SR 1332) to Carr Store Road(SR1004 / SR 1352) is currently a 2-lane, 20-foot cross section. The CTPproject proposal is to provide a 24-foot cross section with improvements to turnlanes and straightening of the roadway where needed. This project proposaloverlaps with NCDOT project W-5143 to improve the horizontal alignment of thecurve on Efland-Cedar Grove Road (SR 1004) north of the intersection withHighland Farm Road (SR 1332). NCDOT project W-5143 is scheduled to beginright-of-way in April, 2013 and construction in April, 2014. Mebane Oaks Road (SR 1007), Local ID ORAN0006-H:Mebane Oaks Road(SR 1007) from NC 54 to Alamance County is currently a 2-lane, 22-foot crosssection. The CTP project proposal is to provide a 24-foot cross section with wideshoulders and turn lanes where needed. Old NC 86 (SR 1009), Local ID ORAN0007-H:Old NC 86 (SR 1009) fromArthur Minnis Road (SR 1113) (the DCHC MPO boundary) to Davis Road (SR1129) (the DCHC MPO boundary) is currently a 2-lane, 22-foot cross section.The CTP project proposal is to provide a 24-foot cross section with wideshoulders and turn lanes where needed. 13 ReturntoAgenda Durham-Chapel Hill- Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization Burlington-Graham Metropolitan Planning Organization 86 54 57 49 157 Dodsons Cross Rd (SR1102) C a r r S t o r e R d (S R 1 3 5 2 ) WhiteCrossRd (SR1951) S a w mi l l Rd (S R 1 5 4 5) A l a m a n c e C o u n t y C a s w e l l C o u n t y P e r s o n C o u n t y D u r h a m C o u n t y C h a t h a m C o u n t y 3 3 Public Transportation and Rail Map Recommended Existing Fixed Guideway Needs Improvement Recommended Existing Needs Improvement Recommended Existing Bus Routes Needs Improvement High Speed Rail Corridor Existing Recommended Park and Ride Lot "Recommended Existing" Operational Strategies Intermodal Connector Existing Recommended Active Inactive Rail Corridor Recommended Existing Recommended Rail Stops Orange County Comprehensive Transportation Plan DRAFT Plan date: December 11, 2012 q 01234 Miles Figure 1 Sheet 3 of 5 Refer to CTP document for more details Base map date: April, 2009 14 Attachment2 Att a c h m e n t 2 1 4 ReturntoAgenda (;&(5372)PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION & RAIL 352-(&7'(6&5,37,216)5207+(&737(&+1,&$/5(3257 There are currently no existing rail facilities or recommendations within the CTP planning area; Orange County’s existing rail lines are contained within the MPO areas. Bus Routes “The Bus and Rail Investment Plan in Orange County”, adopted by the Orange County Board of County Commissioners on October 2, 2012, was utilized in the development of the bus element of the Orange County CTP. The CTP bus Recommendations are listed below. More detailed information regarding “The Bus and Rail Investment Plan in Orange County” is available through Orange County. x Local ID ORAN0001-T:Bus route along NC 54 from Alamance County to Neville Road (SR 1945) (the DCHC MPO boundary). The draft DCHC MPO 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and CTP identifies this recommendation as Express Bus projects B6a and B6b. x Local ID ORAN0002-T:Bus route along NC 86 from Coleman Loop Road (SR 1334) (the DCHC MPO boundary) to Caswell County. Park-and-Ride Lots The CTP proposes the following potential park-and-ride lots to provide access to the proposed bus routes (ORAN0001-T and ORAN0002-T). All locations are based on current available information and are subject to change based on further study in the future. In addition,specific information such as number of spaces, surface of lot, and additional amenities would be developed at a later date. The CTP recommendation identifies general areas where lots are anticipated to be needed, with the intent of initially small lots with relatively minor amenities that grow as ridership increases. x Local ID ORAN0003-T:The CTP project proposal is to provide a park-and-ride lot at the intersection of NC 54 and White Cross Road (SR 1951). This project would provide access to the bus routealong NC 54 (ORAN0001-T), for users of both vehicles and bicycles. x Local ID ORAN0004-T:The CTP project proposal is to provide a park-and-ride lot at the Cedar Grove Park on NC 86.This project would provide access to the bus route along NC 86, for usersof both vehicles and bicycles (ORAN0001-B). 15 ReturntoAgenda Durham-Chapel Hill- Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization Burlington-Graham Metropolitan Planning Organization 86 54 57 49 157 O r a n g e G ro v e R d (S R 1006) Old Greensb or o Rd (SR 10 0 5 ) Dodsons Cross Rd (SR1102) N e w S h a r o n C h u r c h R d (S R 1 5 38) HighRock R d (SR1340) B u c k h o r n Rd ( S R 1 1 1 4) C a rr S t ore R d(SR1004) Schle y R d (SR1548) Lynch StoreRd(SR1364) H ig hla n d F ar m R d ( S R 1332) HollyRidg e R d(S R 1524) C a r r S t o r e R d (S R 1 3 5 2 ) Mebane Oaks Rd (SR 100 7) W alnutGroveChurchRd (SR1001) B r a d s h a w Q ua rr y R d (S R 1 1 1 5 ) WhiteCrossRd (SR1951) Efland-Cedar Grove R d (SR 100 4/ 1 3 5 7 ) Dai ryland Rd(SR 1177) C o r b e tt R id g e R d ( S R 1 0 0 4) S a w m i l l Rd (S R 1 5 4 5) J o n es F e r r y R d (S R 1 9 4 2 ) OakGro v e C h u rc h R d (SR 1117) ¬¬M2 ¬¬M2 A l a m a n c e C o u n t y C a s w e l l C o u n t y P e r s o n C o u n t y D u r h a m C o u n t y C h a t h a m C o u n t y Bicycle Map Existing Needs Improvement Recommended On-road Existing Needs Improvement Recommended Off-road Existing Grade Separation Proposed Grade Separation Needs Improvement Recommended Existing Multi-Use Paths ¬¬M#North Carolina Bike Route Orange County Comprehensive Transportation Plan DRAFT Plan date: December 11, 2012 q 01234 Miles Figure 1 Sheet 4 of 5 Refer to CTP document for more details Base map date: April, 2009 16 Attachment3 Att a c hme n t 3 1 6 ReturntoAgenda (;&(5372)BICYCLEPROJECTS )5207+(&737(&+1,&$/5(3257 The Orange County Bicycle Transportation Plan was adopted in 1999and was intended todevelop transportation facilities and programsfor bicyclists in Orange County. These recommendations were incorporated intothe Orange County CTP. The1999 Orange County Bicycle Transportation Plan anddetailed information regarding its recommendations are available through Orange County. Minor additionstothe CTP recommendationsbeyondthe 1999 Orange County BicycleTransportation Plan are listed below. As previously mentioned,thenetwork of CTPrecommendations provides a combination of recreational and commutingopportunities. x Local ID ORAN0001-B: NC 86 from Carr Store Road (SR 1352) / Sawmill Road W (SR 1545) to proposedpark-and-ride lotat Cedar Grove Park (ORAN0004-T).This recommendation wasadded in order to provideusers onthe recommended bicycle facility along Carr Store Road (SR 1352) / Sawmill Road W (SR 1545) with access topublic transportation services via the proposed park-and-ride lot (ORAN0004-T). This is currently an on-road recommendationfor more immediate improvements,butthe ultimate 4-lane expressway cross section forNC 86 in the future could require anoff- roadfacilityto maintain this connection for bicycles. x Local ID ORAN0002-B: NC Bike Route 2 / Mountainsto Sea Trail along Old Greensboro Road (SR 1005) from Carl Durham Road (SR 1950)to Bowden Road (SR 1946) (theDCHC MPO boundary). Although this facility is already designatedas NC Bike Route2, this section is in needofupgrades,such as wider lanesorshoulders, in orderto accommodate bicycles. (The section from Alamance Countyto Carl Durham Road (SR 1950)has recently been widened and resurfaced.) x Local ID ORAN0003-B: Jones Ferry Road (SR 1942) from Chatham Countyto Ferguson Road (SR1948) (the DCHC MPOboundary). This project was included in order to ensure connectivity withthe2035DCHC MPO Long Range Transportation Plan recommendationsand the draftDCHC MPO 2040Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and CTP recommendations. x Local ID ORAN0004-B: NC 86 from Phelps Rd (SR 1551)to Walnut Grove Church Rd (SR 1001). This project was included in orderto provideconnectivity with recommendations in the draftDCHC MPO 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and CTP recommendations. x Local ID ORAN0005-B: Walnut Grove Church Rd (SR 1001) from NC 86to Pearson Rd (SR1544). This project was included in order to provideconnectivity with recommendations in the draftDCHC MPO 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and CTP recommendations. x Local ID ORAN0006-B: Schley Rd (SR 1548) from Walnut Grove Church Rd(SR 1001)to New Sharon Church Rd (SR 1538) (theDCHC MPO boundary) (SR 1001)to New Sharon Church Rd (SR 1538) (theDCHC MPO boundary). This project was included in orderto provideconnectivity with recommendations in the draftDCHC MPO 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and CTPrecommendations. x Local ID ORAN0007-B: Efland-Cedar Grove Rd (SR 1357) from Carr Store Rd(SR 1004/1352)to McDade Store Rd (SR 1358/1354). This project was included in order to providefurther connectivity between recommendations included from the1999 Orange County Bicycle Transportation Plan. x Local ID ORAN0008-B: McDade Store Rd (SR 1361) from Pentecost Rd (SR 1361) / McDade Store Rd (SR 1358) to NC 49.This project was included in orderto providefurtherconnectivity between recommendations included fromthe1999 Orange County Bicycle Transportation Plan. x Local ID ORAN0009-B: NC 49 from McDade Store Rd (SR 1361)to CaswellCounty. This project was included in order to provide further connectivitybetween recommendations included fromthe1999 Orange County Bicycle Transportation Plan. x Local ID ORAN0010-B: W Lebanon Rd (SR 1306) from Saddle Club Rd (SR 1346)to Mill Creek Rd (SR 1345). This project was included in orderto provide connectivity with recommendations in the draftDCHC MPO 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and CTP recommendations. x SPOT ID 1160: Orange Grove Road (SR 1006)and Buckhorn Road (SR 1114) from Dairyland Road (SR 1177) to West Ten Road (SR 1146). This project was submittedbythe Triangle Area RPO tothe NCDOT Strategic Planning Office of Transportation (SPOT) as part of the Prioritization 2.0 Process in 2011. This projectoverlaps with a section of NCDOT project EB-5520on Orange Grove Road (SR 1006) between Dairyland Road (SR 1177)and Buckhorn Road (SR 1114). x Local ID EB-5520: NCDOT projectEB-5520 is to add 4-footshoulders to Orange Grove Road (SR 1006) from NC 54to Arthur Minnis Road (SR 1115). There is currently no right-of-wayor constructiondate scheduled. This project overlaps with the Orange Grove Road (SR 1006) section ofSPOTID1160 between Dairyland Road (SR 1177) and Buckhorn Road (SR 1114). The projects below were also submittedbythe Triangle Area RPO totheNCDOT Strategic PlanningOffice of Transportation (SPOT) aspart of the Prioritization 2.0 Process in 2011, but were already included in the CTP recommendations taken from the1999 Orange County Bicycle Transportation Plan. x SPOT ID 1095:Dairyland Road (SR 1177) from Union Grove Church Road (SR 1111) to Orange Grove Road (SR 1006). x SPOT ID 958:Orange Grove Road (SR 1006)and Dodsons Cross Road (SR1102) from I-40to Dairyland Road (SR 1177). x SPOT ID 559:Efland-Cedar Grove Road (SR 1004) from Highland Farm Road (SR 1332) to Carr Store Road (SR 1004 /SR 1352). 17 ReturntoAgenda 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Durham-Chapel Hill- Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization Burlington-Graham Metropolitan Planning Organization 86 54 57 49 157 Dodsons Cross Rd (SR1102) N e w S h a r o n C h u r c h R d (S R 153 8) HighRock R d (SR1340) M o u nt W il l i n g R d (S R 1 1 2 0 ) C a rr S t ore R d(SR1004) S c hl ey R d ( S R 1548) L i ttle River Church Rd (SR 1543) H ig hla n d F ar m R d ( S R 1332) C a r r S t o r e R d (S R 1 3 5 2 ) Wa lnutGroveChurchRd(SR1001) Efland-Cedar Grove R d (SR 100 4/1 3 5 7 ) Dai ryland Rd(SR 1177) S a w m i l l Rd (S R 1 5 4 5) P e destrian M o u ntainstoSeaTrail Upper Eno / Cedar Grove Upper Eno / Cedar Grove Little River Little River Cane Creek / Bingham Camp Chestnut Ridge Cane Creek Reservoir A l a m a n c e C o u n t y C a s w e l l C o u n t y P e r s o n C o u n t y D u r h a m C o u n t y C h a t h a m C o u n t y Z[70]^85 ]^40 Pedestrian Map 5 Local Recreation SitesRural Communities Existing Grade Separation Proposed Grade Separation q 01234 Miles Refer to CTP document for more details Base map date: April, 2009 Multi-Use Paths Existing Needs Improvement Recommended Needs Improvement Recommended Existing Sidewalks Needs Improvement Recommended Existing Off-Road Orange County Comprehensive Transportation Plan DRAFT Plan date: December 11, 2012 Figure 1 Sheet 5 of 5 18 Attachment4 Att a c hme n t 4 1 8 ReturntoAgenda (;&(537)5207+(&737(&+1,&$/5(32575(*$5',1*PEDESTRIANPROJECTS Orange County currentlyhas apedestrian planunder development for off-roadpedestrian facilities throughoutthe county. Existing recommendations fromthis plan were incorporated intothe Orange County CTP. The County’s pedestrian plan and detailedinformation regardingits recommendations areavailable through Orange County. 19 ReturntoAgenda O O O O OO OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO OO O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O P P P P P P Durham-Chapel Hill- Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization Burlington-Graham Metropolitan Planning Organization 86 54 57 49 157 A l a m a n c e C o u n t y C a s w e l l C o u n t y P e r s o n C o u n t y D u r h a m C o u n t y C h a t h a m C o u n t y Refer to CTP document for more details Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan date: December 11, 2012 q North Carolina P Airports O Schools Roads Rivers and Streams Water Bodies Parks and Gamelands County Boundaries MPO Boundaries Pedestrian MapSheet 5 Highway Map Public Transportation and Rail Map Bicycle MapSheet 4 Sheet 3 Sheet 2 Sheet 1Adoption Sheet Figure 1 Sheet 1 of 5 Adopted by: NCDOT Date: Orange County Date: Triangle Area RPO Date: Transportation Planning Branch Date: Endorsed by: Recommended by: NOTES: Orange County DRAFT 01234 Miles Base map date: April, 2009 20Attachment5 Att a c h m e n t 5 p 2 0 ReturntoAgenda 02/20/2013 1 DRAFT COMMENTSand Recommendations Orange County Draft Comprehensive Transportation Plan A.CTP Map Comments 1.Highway Map a.The dashed line legends for Minor Thoroughfares are very difficult to read on the map. It is suggested that the dashed lines for ‘Needs Improvement’ and ‘Recommended’ be made a bolder color that would be more visible. [Comment made by Planning Staff] Planning Staff Explanation: At the 11” x 17” size, the gray shades under the Minor Thoroughfares category are nearly impossible to discern. b.Extend the Minor Thoroughfare ‘Needs Improvement’ line on Efland-Cedar Grove Road north from Carr Store Road to the northern property line of the U.S. Post Office. [Comment made by OUTBoard] Planning Staff Response: Staff supports this comment. This minorextension of the project to include the U.S. Post Office is recommended because the Post Office is one of the larger trip generators in the area(1300 AADT, 2011 per NCDOT),and the frontage has wide open access and needs improvements that enhance safety. 2.Public Transportation and Rail Map – No comments. 3.Bicycle Map a.Add NCDOT/TARPO proposed bike path on Old NC 86 between Arthur Minnis Road and Ode Turner Road.[Comment made by Planning Staff] Planning Staff Explanation: This section of the Old NC 86 bike path is on the boundary between TARPO’s and DCHC MPO’sjurisdictions, and is also included on the proposed DCHC MPO CTP list. Both TARPO and DCHC MPO have suggested that for consistency it be included in both CTPs. 4.Pedestrian Map – Rural Community Nodes should be revised as follows: •Revise Cane Creek/Bingham label to White Cross •Revise Upper Eno/Cedar Grove label (western one on map) to Carr •Revise Upper Eno/Cedar Grove label (eastern one on map) to Cedar Grove •Revise Little River label (northern one on map) to Caldwell •Revise Little River label (southern one on map) to Schley [Comment made by Planning Staff] Planning Staff Explanation: The node labels on the Pedestrian Map were incorrect. The revised node labels would be consistent with the Orange County Comprehensive Plan. B.CTP Report Comments 21Attachment6 ReturntoAgenda 02/20/2013 2 1.Page I-15 Bicycles and Pedestrians a.Delete: Orange County also has a pedestrian plan in progress that was utilized in the development of the pedestrian element of the CTP.and Add: The Pedestrian Map depicts approximate locations of recommended off-road trails that follow historic road corridors and link rural community nodes, public facilities and destinations. The trail locations are consistent with a draft Rural Pedestrian Connectivity Plan for Orange County that was developed by a Steering Committee subcommittee for the Comprehensive Transportation Plan.[Comment made by Planning Staff] Planning Staff Explanation: Orange County does not have an official pedestrian plan in progress. Rather, a subcommittee of the CTP Steering Committee developed a draft Rural Pedestrian Connectivity Plan for Orange County that has no official standing. The trails depicted on the Pedestrian Map are consistent with this draft plan, and approximate locations of recommended off-road trails that follow historic road corridors and link rural community nodes, public facilities and destinations. 2.Page II-3– II-5 Highway Problem Statements a.Revise project descriptions to include shoulder widthsand paving details.[Comment made by OUTBoard] Planning Staff Response:6WDIIVXSSRUWVWKLVFRPPHQW 3.Page II-5Highway Problem Statements / Minor Improvements a.Revise project description for (North) Efland-Cedar Grove Road (SR 1004), SPOT ID #559 as follows: Efland-Cedar Grove Road (SR 1004) from Highland Farm Road (SR 1332) to the northern property line of the US Post Office north of Carr Store Road (SR 1004/SR 1342) is currently a 2-lane, 20- foot cross section. The CTP project proposal is to provide a 24-foot cross section with improvements to turn lanes and straightening of the roadway where needed. This project proposal overlaps with NCDOT project W-5143 to improve the horizontal alignment of the curve on Efland-Cedar Grove Road (SR 1004) north of the intersection with Highland Farm Road (SR 1332). CDOT project W-5143 is scheduled to begin right- of-way in April, 2013 and construction in April, 2014. [Comment made by OUTBoard] Planning Staff Response: Staff supports this comment.This minor extension of the project to include the U.S. Post Office is recommended because the Post Office is one of the larger trip generators in the area (1300 AADT, 2011 per NCDOT), and the frontage has wide open access and needs improvements that enhance safety. P.O. 22 ReturntoAgenda 01-24-2013 BOCC Public Hearing Comments on CTP Alice Gordon asked a question about the initials “MAJ” that is used on page 101 of the agenda packet. Do we need a key? What does this mean? Sara Lee referred Alice to page 100 and showed her that MAJ refer to Other Major Thoroughfare. Alice Gordon asked Sara Lee about what kind of comments DOT was looking for from the BOCC. Is the BOCC trying to figure out if the CTP recommendations are correct? Sara Lee replied that DOT is looking for approval on the recommendations when the CTP comes back to them in March. Mark Dorosin asked about how coordination worked with the MPO CTPs, transit plan, etc. Replies came from staff as well as a few other commissioners. Earl McKee explained that the various plans have different controlling organizations and different funding sources. Mr. Ed Flowers, Hillsborough spoke. He had special interests with regard to bus/transit services for the aging, and especially increasing these services for rural senior citizens, and having more buses with better communicationsystems. Mr. Alex Castro, Bingham Township spoke. Alex is also on the Advisory Board on Aging and the OUTboard, but stressed that he was speaking tonight strictly as a private citizen. He said that there is a problem of governance and coordination with all the transportation plans and issues and there needs to be some consolidation. He also said that seniors fall through the cracks; they have disabilities, etc. and there are few bus services, and these are fragmented and disjointed. Ms. Bonnie Hauserspoke. She asked if it would be possible to combine cycling lanes/trails with the Mountain-to-Seal Trail through Bingham Township. The BOCC didn’t offer a response at this time. There were various questions about project funding sources from various commissioners. Alice Gordon and Bernadette Pelissierboth asked about the park-and-ride lots depicted on the CTP Transit Map - is there consistency with the Transit Plan and coordination of funding?They asked if the park-and-ride lots would be funded by DOT or through the Transit Plan. Tom Altieri responded, reiterating that the CTP is not fiscally constrained and the funding for projects in the plan is not known at this time. Earl McKee stated that funding decisions through the TARPO TAC has been very fair, and added that Orange County doesn’t have a lot of control over this DOT CTP. Barry Jacobs stressed that the CTP is not fiscally constrained. Barry Jacobs made a brief statement about the Orange County vs the DOT positionon the NC 86 StrategicHighway Corridor. He stated that Orange County has long been opposed to widening NC 86 from the Caswell County line to where it comes into Hillsborough, and this CTP (Highway Map project) is NCDOT’s way to make it a major Boulevard. This will create a huge bottleneck where NC 86 comes into Hillsborough and this hasn’t really been addressed in the CTP or by anyone, and now we’re going to try to run transit though the same bottleneck. Earl McKee moved the Manager’s recommendations from the Abstract. RenePrice seconded the motion.It was unanimously approved. 23 &RPPLVVLRQHU&RPPHQWV 3XEOLF&RPPHQWV Attachment7 ReturntoAgenda ?ª ?ª ?r Aæ I§ I§ !"c$!"_$ !"_$ !"c$ K© ?o ?o Ir KÊ Ir KÊ ?k M T S I N A I R D E S TES D R B U C K H O R N R D D AIRYLA N D RD H O M E STEA D RD WE ST H ILL AV E S WALKER RD OAKDALE D R D A M A S C U S C H U R C H R D LEBANON RD OLD DURHAM R D E r w i n R d MILL C R E E K R D RALEIGH RD E FRANKLIN S T T E R R Y R D G RAY RD OLD NC 10 H ALLS MI L L RD PEARSON R D B R A D S H A W Q U A R R Y R D ORA N GE GROVE RD SOUTH R D O D E T U R N E R RD LITTLE RIVER CHURCH R D N ESTE S D R N E W H O PE C H U R C H R D WEST TEN R D WEAVER DAIRY R D NEW SHA R O N C H U R C H R D OLD G REENSBO RO RD S C H L E Y RD RI C H M O ND RD EBE N E Z E R CHUR C H R D J O N E S F E R R Y R D UNIVERSITY STATION RD MAN N I N G D R F ERGUS O N RD E TRYON ST H E B R ON C H U R C H RD C A R R S T ORE R D LYNCH S T O R E RD D ODSONS XRDS B O W M A N R D C O L E MIL L R D TH OM RD DIM M OCKS MILL RD B O RLAND R D HAT C H R D ARTHUR M I NNIS RD S T M A R Y S R D CA R L D U R HA M RD RALEIG H R D SCHLEY R D LAWS STORE RD EPHESUS CHURCH R D B O R L A N D R D FRAZ IER RD BAMA RD BU T L E R R D WH I T F I ELD RD M A T T R E S S F A C T O R Y R D O L D H I L L S B O R O U G H R D KENION RD ALBERT RD C R A I G R D O L D F A Y E T T E V I L L E R D B A L D W IN RD W MAIN S T S A W M I L L RD BACON R D CRAIG RD C AVIN ESS JORD AN RD SA W Y E R R D DAVIS RD IRA RD HAWKINS RD B ILL P O OLE RD MILLER R D MCKEE RD HENS L EY R D HIG H L A N D F A R M R D WALNUT G R OVE CHU R C H R D MC B R O O M R D M C D A D E S T O R E R D PHELPS RD O R M OND R D HOLLY RID G E R D E U B A N KS RD GO V E R N O R SCOTT R D BACON R D OLIN RD KE R L E Y R D PE NECOST RD KIGER R D Y A R B O R O U G H R D H ESTER R D B U S H Y C O O K RD NICKS RD W I L D C AT C R E E K R D V E RN O N R D B U R T O N R D CLAIBO R N E S RD T EER R D WAD E S D E A D E ND STANF O R D RD WILKERSON R D PLEASA N T GREEN RD PL EA S A NT GREEN R D FAUCETTE MILL R D H IL L S B O R O U G H R D HIG H R O C K RD HURD LE M I L L S RD HUNT R D S GREENSBORO ST M T M O R I A H R D C R AWFO R D D AIRY R D M T W I L L I N G R D LAWRENCE RDN N A S H S T SMI T H L E VEL RD EF L A N D C E DAR GROVE RD S A D DLE CLUB R D NE V I L L E R D TURKEY FA R M RD POPE RD BOW D EN RD MARY HALL RD C O L E M A N LOO P O L D N C 8 6 OLD NC 86 BERRY RD B I V I N S RD N E W S H A R O N CHU R C H R D R O G E R S R D WHITE CROSS RD KERLEY R D F R A NK P E R R Y RD MORROW M I L L R D OAK GR O V E C H U R C H R D C HESTNUT R I D G E CHUR C H R D MEBANE OAKS R D MARY HALL R D M E B A N E O A K S R D WALNUT GROVE CHURCH RD S CHURTON ST B R O O KHOLLOW RD H A LL DA I R Y RD B R O W N R D C O R B E T T R ID G E R D CO LL INS M O U NTAIN RD ART RD MT MORIAH R D HAWKINS R D WADE LOOP C O M P T O N R D ATKINS RD D A I R Y L A N D RD M T C A R M E L C H U R CH R D W CORN WALLIS R D County Boundary B-G MPO DCHC MPO Bike Paths B-G MPO DCHC NCDOT/TARPO Existing NCDOT/TARPO Proposed 01 Miles 1 in = 1.9 miles· Orange County Planning and Inspections Department GIS Map Prepared by Brian Carson. 1/2/2013 Composite CTP Bicycle Map 24 Attachment8 At t a c h m e n t 8 2 4 ReturntoAgenda Maple View Farm Store Blackwood Station New Hope Improvement Ctr Cedar GroveCedar Grove Caldwell Schley White Cross Cedar Grove Carr Smith Orange Central Seawell Rashkis New Hope Pathways Culbreth Carrboro McDougle McDougle Carrboro Glenwood Cedar Ridge Estes Hills Chapel Hill Morris Grove Cameron Park Hillsborough Mary Scroggs Ephesus Road Gravelly Hill C.W. Stanford Efland-Cheeks A. L. Stanback Grady A. Brown Phoenix Academy Guy B. Phillips East Chapel Hill Partnership Academy Frank Porter Graham YMCA Sportsplex Camp New Hope Central Rec Ctr Camp Chestnut Ridge Cane Creek Reservoir ^_ Central Senior Center Seymour Senior Center B E A M D C H F G N L J K I I 4 0 E I 40 W NC 5 7 I 85 S I 85 N NC 86 N N C 5 4 W US 70 W NC 8 6 S NC 49 ST MARYS RD OL D N C 86 SCHLEY RD I 85 N I 40 E O R A N GE GR O V E R D B U C K H O R N R D LEBANON RD HAWKINS RD G U E S S R D US 70A OLD GREENSBORO RD HI G H R O C K R D MT SINAI RD M T WILLING RD WEST TE N RD JON E S FE RR Y RD E R WIN R D DO DSO N S XR D S O L D N C 10 N C 1 5 7 EFL AN D C E DAR G R OVE R D WI L K E R SO N R D MILL C R E EK R D NE W SH AR O N C H UR C H R D C A R R S T O R E R D BORLAND RD MI L L E R R D KIGER RD HURD L E MI LLS R D WAL NUT GR OVE C H U R C H R D DAVIS RD BROWN RD NICKS RD U S 7 0 E US 15 5 0 1 S PLEASAN T GRE EN RD BREEZE RD H A R M O N Y C H U R C H R D PEARSON RD TEER RD SAWY ER RD WHITFIELD RD DAIRYLAND RD WHITE CR O S S R D ARTHUR MINNIS RD T E R R Y R D OLIN RD PHELPS RD LY N C H S T O RE R D IRA R D BA M A RD LAWS STORE RD PE N E C O S T R D A L L I S O N R D HUNT RD H E S T E R R D ATK I N S R D EUBANKS RD N C 54 B R A D S H A W QU A R R Y R D CRA IG R D G R A Y R D LA W R E N C E R D NC 54 HOMESTEAD RD KERLE Y R D MC KEE RD SMIT H L E V E L R D AR T RD BOWMAN RD HA TCH R D E S T E S DR E FR A N KLIN S T DIMMOCK S M ILL R D WALK E R R D HENSLEY RD E WA S H I N G T ON S T SAWMILL RD I 85 S I 40 W LITTLE RIVER CHURCH RD TA P P RD H OLLY RI D GE R D HI G H L A N D F A R M R D KENION RD BIVIN S R D BR O O KH O L L O W RD OAK GROVE CHURCH RD BACON RD GA T E S R D U NIV E R SIT Y S TA TIO N R D OR MOND R D FR A ZIE R R D YA R B O R O U G H R D MINCEY RD MORRO W M ILL R D NE VIL LE R D M C DAD E S T O R E R D COLE MILL RD SA D D L E CL U B RD W KING ST WEAVER DAIRY RD C O R B E T T RI D G E R D DOC CORBETT R D CHEST N UT RID GE C H URC H R D W MAIN ST PINEHURST DR NC 75 1 MAC E RD MAR T I N L U T H E R K I N G J R BL V D CO M P TO N R D LIB RD HALLS MILL RD BU S HY CO O K R D MARY HALL RD UNION G RO VE CH U R C H RD BA L D W I N RD BILL P OO LE R D BEN W I L S O N R D RIC HM O N D R D FER G U SO N RD LEE ST O L D LYS T R A R D W C O R N W ALLIS R D LONESOME RD UMSTEAD RD SNEED RD POPE RD M T C A R M E L C H U R C H R D JO MAC RD CA RL D U R H A M R D BUNNY RD N ESTES DR TU R KE Y F A R M R D BO W D E N RD OA K W O O D S T MIL L H O U S E R D S CH URT O N S T COLEMAN LOO P FA U C E T T E M I L L R D FA RRI N G T ON R D W IL D C AT C R EEK R D TREE FARM RD MILLIKAN RD M U RPHY S CH O OL RD D AM A S C U S C H U R C H R D RO GE R S R D G O V E R N O R S C O TT R D M A N NIN G D R O L D F A Y E T T E V IL L E R D POT E A T RD N C 1 5 7 W N C H W Y 54 E AST IV E Y R D BAYBERRY DR ALLIE MAE RD CO L L IN S M O UN T A I N R D S U N RIS E R D M T M O R I A H R D LIN DEN R D BERR Y RD RAY RD LA KE OR A N GE RD BEN JOHNSTON RD LLO Y DT OW N R D STAN F O R D RD B O O T H R D TWIN ELMS RD WADE L O O P D U M O N T D R SPAR GE R RD LE GI O N RD CAV I NES S J O R D AN R D N N I N T H S T HA LL D AIRY RD OA KDALE DR I 85 S I 40 W HOWE ST JOHN OAK RD G AIT W A Y WIL LETT R D ALT M AN RD OD E T U RN E R RD P ATH W AY D R N F I F T H S T WILLOW DR MT MITCHELL RD EDMUND LATTA RD BARB EE C HA PE L RD INDU S T R I A L DR GOVERNOR BURKE RD SPLIT R A IL LN BANE RD CULBRETH RD SOUTHERN DR COAC H W A Y N N A S H S T S C OL U M BIA S T V A L L I E HI L N FO RD R D BR O C K D R FRA N K P ERR Y R D KI M B R O R D CORNELIUS ST PARK E R R D WALKERS FARM RD JONES RD TILLEY RD LEE S C H APEL RD OA K A V E DA WS ON RD E L G R D CR AWFO R D DAIR Y R D HAYES RD BURT O N R D MYSTIC LN D OB BINS DR G O L D M I N E R D DA V IE R D JACKS ON RD SQ U I RE S R D M T Z I O N C H U R C H R D H ID E A W A Y D R S ESTES DR JAMES S T LATIMER ST WHI T A KE R R D DO E R U N R D OAKW OO D DR ENO ST SOUTH RD MART I N RD ME BA NE OA K S R D UMSTEAD DR WA D E S D E A D E N D FRIEND S SC HO O L RD EN O CEM E T E RY R D LITTLE RIVER DR DI XIE D R CAROL ST N F R A Z I E R R D V ER N O N RD LUCY LN AL P H A D R JIMMY ED RD EMORY D R MASON FARM RDCOKER DR PINE Y MO U N T AIN R D JRK DR S AG E RD THOM RD C E D A R P A S S STAG G R D GREEN RILEY RD US 70 E COOKE S T JERICHO R D N G R E E N S B O R O ST RED GATE RD CANTER DR M OUNTAIN CREEK RD HOYT DR MANDY LN MANGUM CT THRE E C R E E K S R D S E I G H T H S T WOLFS TRL OA K LE Y RD MOOREFIELDS RD AL E X DR P O P LAR L N CLELAND DR CLAIBORNES R D ERI C K A D R MARKS LN OL D S C HO O L R D C D FARM S RD C U M M I N G S D R M T HE R M O N CHU R C H RD RALEIGH RD ARROW HEAD BLV D TRIPP RD R E D HILL L N GREENW O OD RD HAMIL TON R D JOMALI DR JON Q U I L T R L PR E AC H E R H A Y E S R D E R O SEMA R Y ST MCCULLOUGH RD RID G E R D LE A K L N C ARL D R DRA G ON F L Y T R L PA L M E R S G R O VE C H U R C H R D SHA M B L E Y R D WINSOME LN RA N D O LPH R D PE ND E R D R GI B BS LN C A R O L L N YATES RD BU M P H US R D EX C E L L D R ORAN GE C HAP E L CLOVE R G A R D EN RD VIO LE T L N N LAKES HO RE DR FA Y E S T HOL L Y C RE E K LN RA I N E Y AV E I 85 U S 7 0 C O N NEC T O R AR BO R ET UM DR MA Y R D G RIDG ELIF T LN RIDERS TRL CAS CAD E D R CRE E K W OOD D R S ES A M E R D EBENEZER CHURCH RD H O L LY HI L L RD OLD HILLSBOROUGH RD S EV ERI N ST AN GUS LN SU M M I T DR SOUT H E R N WO OD DR U S 15 -5 0 1 H W Y N RA DN OR FAR M RD GAILS TRL D A ND M M CCA U LE Y S T HA R P E R R D LANCASTER DR S ervic e R d CABE FORD RD ISLAND RD OAK ST DALTON DR NORMANS RD FOXLA I R R D HOPKINS RD BO W AT ER X I N G GO L D M I N E L O O P FOUNTAIN RIDGE RD ALB ERT RD N L L O Y D S D A I RY R D PAS C H ALL DR HAWK RIDGE RD LA N C ASTE R R D I 40 E EXIT 261 MEADOWCREST DR DA W N D R WHE E L E R S C H U R C H R D VIREO LN DEER RUN TRL REE V E S R D L Y N C H C R E E K F A R M R D BYR D RD H A W E S R D HOLLOW OAKS DR E MAIN ST FULL ER RD P IC K E T T R D EL I Z A L N I 85 S I 40 W REN FREW DR STROWD LN MINNIS DR SINAI C I R THERE S A LN MCKEE SCHOOL RD SY K E S DR TALBR Y N WAY OAK LEAF DR BRIGADO ON DR HOME RD RAMS E Y RD R I D G E W O O D R D GYM RD WAGNER BND S H A DE T R E E R D HEPOWI L TRCE OD A Y D R LAFAYETTE DR KIM S D R F O X T R L LONGWO OD DR EL V A LN BR IGH T S W A Y DEZERN DRSE R E N IT Y L N LASS EN S T R L OMA L N EL L O D R B ERRY ANDR EW S RD RIC HAR D LN PAT R I C K DR OAK HILL RD MINNICK RD W FR A N K LI N S T BPW CLUB RD ACORN D R JOY N E R R D KINGS MILL RD LEXI L N SE TT E R L N KATHY DR WILSON RD PER RY CREE K DR KEN MO R E RD AMBER DR RAGAN RD WHIT E O AK D R SE R VIC E R D M C B R O O M R D LA MESA LN MANOR DR T A PRO O T L N ETTA RD ALTEL TOWER RD RIC K R D GRAND OAK DR RAMBLEWOOD DR WAT SO N R D CO U N C I L L N RU D Y S FAR M R D BERRYHILL DR S L A KES H O R E DR T R I C E A T W A T E R R D GA R Y R D HA R DS CRA B BLE D R TRAMORE DR YONDER TRL DUKE FORE ST RD CA R R IN GTO N L N ROOSEVELT DR JIM MIN O R R D GEMENA RD PO P L A R DR ME A D O W WI N D LN GAL W A Y D R MOOSE TRACK TRL LIPPS LN REX DR CH A R L E S L N RITCHIE RD P I N T A I L D R MILL S TON E D R BL I SS E NB AC H LN P RI V A T E A C C E S S BR O ML EY R D KNIGHT DR RIGSBEE RD N S F I F T H S T HARDWOOD LN TU SCANY DR HOWARD CT RUSSELLS FORD RD DE E RFIE L D R D W A V E R D TIMBER TRL JUNIPER RD C H U R T O N G R O V E B L V D LEWIS RD AVALON DR BIM ST HO LM E S RD AZALEA DR FLETCHER RD MARIONS FORD RD JOSEPH RD MCGOWAN C REEK RD OL D P I N EV I E W R D ANNAB ELLE LN GREENGLEN DR CIRCLE L T RL CEDAR LN ZERO RD CARL ISLE RD HONEYSUCKLE RD D E S T IN Y D R H O U G H R D H O O T O W L D R PH I L S C R EEK R D LONE B R O O K DR E N O M O U N TAIN R D W E N D Y L N P RE S T ON SPRING L N RO Y A L O A K L N FA I RF IE L D D R OLD MASON FARM RD SADDLE DR SOU T H W I N D L N OLD BUGGY TRL SPRUNT ST S IM M O N S L N BRITTON DR LO NNIE CIR BRADSHER RD OLDE PLACE DR PINEY CREEK LN M ER RI T T D R CH ES H I RE DR MIMOSA DR LAND AU D R OD IE ST N T E N T H S T DEERVIEW TRL GA TES LN LAKE MANOR RD PAPER BIRCH LN TIMBERLY DR CO T T O N R U N R D JA M AX D R CLARENCE DR FO X RID G E R D AUTUMN DR WI D G E O N W A Y WA L L ST WINDING RIVER RD ANGEL WAY GRANNYS DR DA N I ELS FA R M RD GR E EN P I N E R D DEL V IN LN BOOGA BOO TRL FERN CREEK LN CO L L E GE P A RK R D LAN D I N G T R L IVA ADA DR SC O T T L A N D D R LAKEVIE W D R COUNTRY AIR LN CO D Y L N SUN FOREST WAY PAYTON DR MAY NA RD F A RM R D DARBY L N CLYDE RD F O X W O O D D R BIR D S O NG L N BLUE LAKE DR JA COBS TRL ELIJAH POOLE DR GE N E S I S R D CHIL D S D R HOMEPLACE DR BRI SB A N E D R WILK IN S DR SHOCCOREE RIDGE DR W OO DLAN D PA R K D R RA PPL E S D R GALILEAN TRL HIG H R I D GE D R MADERA LN HERMITAGE RD GREEN HI LL DR E CORBIN ST I 40 E EXI T 27 0 WA L N UT C O V E R D STO NE YB ROO K R D SLIM E L M O RE LN DRY CREEK RD S ELLIOTT RD F O X FI R E D R PUREFOY DR VIL L A G E D R PD DR WI N T O N D R W E S T RID G E R D ST O N ERI DGE DR TAN YA D R TR OON L N LE AH DR WINKS WAY CR A WF OR D RD EL IZ AB E T H BRA DY R D C O L E D R THREE FILLIES TRL COL TS FOOT DR ALLEY PAYLOR ST WEA VER DA I R Y RD E X T CHEYENNE DR CRO W N C T OLD STO NY WAY OAK K N O B CT OL D L A KE T R L G L A D E S T JUSTICE ST PA R RI S H R D BA I R D L N B ARCLA Y RD TIL L E Y S F A RM R D BR O O K S RO A D S P U R STAND ISH DR S P R I N G T R L M I L L E R B N D WATERSTONE DR OLD C E D A R G R O V E R D LORA ANN DR RIVE R S I D E DR C A L DW E L L ST OAK RIDGE RD STONY HILL RD STO NEG AT E DR EN O W OOD S TRL WIN NING HAM R D OL D F O RES T D R SUMMER LN MALLORY CT FARIBAULT LN BLA C KSMITH RD TIMBERIDGE CT DEER CROSSING RD LANKFORD DR S P R I N G L I L Y L N PR E S T O N G EO R G E R D IRIS LN US 70 E SHA N N O N DR B R E ZE L A W A Y MA X E BEN WAY BA C K AC R E S R D R O BIN RD W IST E RIA DR STARNS RDG S T E N T H S T BARN E S ST SU R R Y T R L N OA K S T OLD VINE T R L APPL E M I L L R D HI- LO RD I 85 N EXIT 165 O L D OX F OR D R D E GIBBON DR SILO DR LEAH MA RI E R D E ASHLAND D R MI L E B R A N C H R D TE N O A K S DR N M C C A ULEY L N GRE E N R I S E RD I 40 E E X IT 266 RIMMER RD HARMONY LN BL A IR D R LARAMINE DR CARLTON DR BEAVE R T A I L DR SILVER FOX LN DRY RUN DR WALKER FIELD DR KI N G E D WA RD S T AUTUMN LN LY RIC C IR SHADYL AW N RD OLD W OO D S R D LIZZIE LN NEW LEAF LN DEB TR L MONADNOCK RIDGE PU LPI T H IL L RD LUT HER D R WIL D F L O W E R L N GIMGHOUL RD GINGER RD L ENA PEE TRL CALITHEA LN DESERET LN I 40 W E X IT 266 N O R T H ST CARRIAGE RD ALICE ST BIG OAK DR LEGENDS WAY OP U S W A Y LYSTRA LN DA I S Y L N R AP IDS LN B O LIN WO OD D R AL GR AY RD TRA V IS CT EMILY RD HI D D E N V I E W D R DOW N S D R FIE L DV IEW R D W EL C H D R FLORASALINE DR CURDSA ND W AY P HIP P S S T FAISON RD HOLMAN DR B AND H DR CAMDEN LN COUNTRY LN I 85 N EXIT 164 LA PIN LN FA RRAR DR MCPHERSON DR LL A M A L N TWISTED OAK DR I 85 I 40 EXIT 163 LA T T A R D ROCKY TOP DR CH A MB E R S C T LI L M A R C I A L N PAULS DR INGOLD RD JO HNS W OO D S RD HA R D E E L N BLACK D O G RUN MC KE W Y N R D ESTHER DR BO U L DE R R UN R D HUCK LEBER RY LN KIT LN CR OW S N E S T D R RI L E Y D R TE NDRIL LN ACORN RIDGE TRL DU S T Y D R WINDY HILL TRL OLD PLEASANT DR MERLOT LN TUSCARORA DR YORK LOOP GO V E R N O R D R OASIS DR J S L N EMERALDWOOD DR COVENANT DR R EYN AR D R D BR A DF OR D RI D G E R D CRUTCHFIELD RD FERRELL RD DRE W L N KINLIN TR L SPRING STDANNY DR S S E V E N T H S T HAYES DR DELLA ST MEG WAG LN RO S E HIL L DR STAGECOACH RD B U R L AG E CI R SUMMEY LN DO R Y D R N IC O L E D R OP EN L N WOOD SAGE DR SIBLING PINE DR CED A R TR L OR AN GE WOO D D R HEMLO C K DR SHAWNEE DR SWEETFLAG LN PENROSE PL CENT R A L S T GLEN RIDGE DR LET T A D R BIG B R A N C H R D SONGBIRD LN LI T T L E J OHN R D COUNTY SEAT DR HIG HT L N ARMFIELD RD HALIFA X RD VA N N IE L N WILHELM DR CASTELL LN CATES HICKORY HILL LN CA N E R I D G E R D CHESTNUT RD ME T C A L F D R KP L N LA KE CT M C D A D E S T S T A B L E R D MAP L E A V E MCMANNEN DR KNOLLS ST DENALI DR W OLFS CT LY S A ND E R L N SUGARBERRY RD HO L L I S W A Y R H I N E R D PEPPER PL TR I PLE C RE E K D R PIT CH P I NE L N OL D M I L L I K AN L N T H I S T L E T R L CA I N DR HERITAGE DR AM Y J O L N K IN ET IC W AY SHAGBARK CT AN D E R S C T MILAN D R PA ULINE CT BE A S L E Y R D O L D F A R M L N K A T IE L N FINNABAR RD HOLLY LN CH ICKA DE E RD BERN I CE D R BURNSIDE D R BRIGHTWOOD LN OWL S W OOD LN CO M AN C HE TRL T E RRA PIN L N C M KIRK LN P O I N T E P L BRUTON DR SABRE CT VAN C E S T FISH POND RD LAINE RD SA PLIN G T R L T I P I L N TR AIL D R PELI C A N L N ALTA C T EASY ST JUNE DR LITTLE LEAF LN S A RA T O G A T R L WILLOW RIDGE DR ST AFF I ELD L N JD CT SANDERS RD HOL M A N L N STE V E N D R HO LI D A Y P AR K R D CH A V IS RD TIMO T H Y L N WOODKIRK LN LUCK Y J L N HORIZO N PL AUSLING WAY LINA MAE LN BRAY DR RED H A W K R D C Y P R E S S L N SHA M R OC K R D QUAIL R I D G E DR DOE TRL FA I R O A K S R D TYNDRUM DR TRINITY CT S ILAS L N FIRESIDE DR RI L E Y A V E RABBIT RUN LN JAM A I C A R D L A DIXO N JR RD PLA N T RD LE E F O X L N GRIFFIN LN PHILI P D R VAN HOOK RD LIL L I A N D R D O V E R C T EASLEY ST B ENT TR EE D R M IL T O N A V E PE N I NSU LA LN CHASE AVE WES LE Y CT OV ER WA T E R T R L I 85 S I 40 W ALLEY AP PL E M I L L R D MCCULLOUGH RD US 70 E MACE R D PO P L AR D R ALLE Y MEB AN E OA K S R D A L L E Y I 4 0 E E XIT 2 7 0 T E E R R D WILSON RD FOXFIRE DR U S 7 0 E I 85 S I 40 W Emerson Waldorf Carolina Friends Murphey School Efland-Cheeks Ctr Caldwell Community Ctr White Cross Community Ctr Proposed Rural Pedestrian Connectivity Plan Draft Existing bikeway Existing trails Proposed trails Proposed trail corridor Sidewalk recommendations Existing/Future Non-County Parks & Open Space Old roadbeds Railroad Town & County parks Recreation sites") Rural Community Node Rural Neighborhood Node Schoolsnm High school parcels Fire stations Recreational Lakes ^_Proposed I40/85 trail underpass Proposed joint planning area greenway Proposed Mtns-to-Sea Trail - Primary Proposed Mtns-to-Sea Trail - Alternative Existing/Future County Parks & Open Space Community centers A. Old Virginia Post Road B. Rougemont Road C. Eno River Trail D. Yanceyville/Danville Road E. Trading Path F. Lower Trading Path G. Chapel Hill-White Cross H. Old Hillsborough-Chapel Hill I. Blackwood Station Twin Creek to New Hope J. New Hope-Eno Connector K. Fayetteville Pike Road L. High Rock Road M. Old St. Mary’s Road N. St. Mary’s School Road O. Old Post Office Road P. Cameron's Road to the University Q. Carr Trail R. Roxboro Road Z 0241Miles A P O Q R DEAPR Updated by IT-GIS Division 9/6/2011 OC 170i C:\gishome\gisproj\land_resource\Trails2.mxd 25 Attachment9 25 Att a c h m e n t 9 ReturntoAgenda 26 Attachment10 ReturntoAgenda 27 ReturntoAgenda 28 ReturntoAgenda