HomeMy WebLinkAboutOCPB minutes 040616APPROVED 5/4/16
1
MINUTES 1
PLANNING BOARD 2
APRIL 6, 2016 3
REGULAR MEETING 4
5
MEMBERS PRESENT: Lydia Wegman-At-Large Chapel Hill Township (Chair); Tony Blake, Bingham Township 6
Representative (Vice-Chair); Paul Guthrie, At-Large Chapel Hill Township; Buddy Hartley, Little River Township 7
Representative; Laura Nicholson, Eno Township Representative; Lisa Stuckey, Chapel Hill Township Representative; 8
Maxecine Mitchell, At-Large Bingham Township; Kim Piracci, At-Large; James Lea, Cedar Grove Township 9
Representative; Patricia Roberts; Cheeks Township Representative; 10
11
MEMBERS ABSENT: Andrea Rohrbacher, At-Large Chapel Hill Township; 12
13
STAFF PRESENT: Craig Benedict, Planning Director; Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor; Ashley Moncado, 14
Special Projects Planner; Meredith Pucci Administrative Assistant; 15
16
OTHERS PRESENT: None 17
18
AGENDA ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER 19
20
Lydia Wegman called meeting to order and introduced new member, Kim Piracci. 21
22
AGENDA ITEM 2: INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 23
a) Planning Calendar for April and May 24
25
Lydia Wegman reviewed Calendar for next meetings. 26
27
AGENDA ITEM 3: APPROVAL OF MINUTES 28
a) March 2, 2016 Regular Meeting 29
30
MOTION by Buddy Hartley to approve the minutes. Seconded by Tony Blake. 31
VOTE: UNANIMOUS 32
33
34
AGENDA ITEM 4: CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONS TO AGENDA 35
36
No changes to the agenda. 37
38
AGENDA ITEM 5: PUBLIC CHARGE 39
40
Introduction to the Public Charge 41
The Board of County Commissioners, under the authority of North Carolina General 42
Statute, appoints the Orange County Planning Board (OCPB) to uphold the written land 43
development laws of the County. The general purpose of OCPB is to guide and 44
accomplish coordinated and harmonious development. OCPB shall do so in a manner, 45
which considers the present and future needs of its residents and business through 46
efficient and responsive process that contributes to and promotes the health, safety, and 47
welfare of the overall County. The OCPB will make every effort to uphold a vision of 48
responsive governance and quality public services during our deliberations, decision, and 49
recommendations. 50
51
Public Charge 52
APPROVED 5/4/16
2
The Planning Board pledges to the residents of Orange County its respect. The Board 53
asks its residents to conduct themselves in a respectful, courteous manner, both with the 54
Board and with fellow residents. At any time, should any member of the Board or any 55
resident fail to observe this public charge, the Chair will ask the offending member to 56
leave the meeting until that individual regains personal control. Should decorum rail to be 57
restored, the Chair will recess the meeting until such time that a genuine commitment to 58
this public charge is observed. 59
60
AGENDA ITEM 6: CHAIR COMMENTS 61
62
None. 63
64
AGENDA ITEM 7: UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (UDO) TEXT AMENDMENT - To make a 65
recommendation to the BOCC on government-initiated amendments to the text of the 66
UDO regarding sign regulations. This item is scheduled for the May 23, 2016 quarterly 67
public hearing and was most recently discussed by the Planning Board at its March 68
meeting. 69
70
Presenter: Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor 71
72
Michael Harvey reviewed the abstract. 73
74
Paul Guthrie: Just to show everybody what these guys are talking about. This is the Supreme Court ruling that all of 75
this started. About 5 different justices taking a different take at it and they came together for a decision so that’s 76
where it starts. And then tied after North Carolina law and whether it comes anywhere close to this or provides 77
municipalities of Counties with the ability to react to this is the swimming pool these guys are working in right now. 78
79
Michael Harvey continued presentation. 80
81
James Lea: When you say eliminate, what do you mean? Those churches now have to take those signs down? 82
83
Michael Harvey: I believe you are talking about the proposal to eliminate the allowance for off-site directional signage 84
for churches. The answer is no, those churches that already have signs up will be allowed to keep them consistent 85
with the non-conforming section of the UDO. What this means if a car happens to mow it down it cannot be replaced. 86
If the sign falls into disrepair to a certain dollar amount or is destroyed a certain percentage it can’t be replaced. But, 87
they can continue to have them up until such time. And yes, there are going to be institutions that have enjoyed some 88
flexibility that are losing it now. Those churches without this signage will also be unable to erect them. 89
90
Lydia Wegman: So there will be no off site advertising prohibit? 91
92
Michael Harvey: Well right now, there’s no off site advertising technically allowed period. Churches are losing their 93
exemption. Outdoor advertising, specifically billboards, is a totally different animal actually regulated by the state. 94
95
Michael Harvey continued presentation. 96
97
James Lea: Is that an issue just in North Carolina? 98
99
Michael Harvey: No, but communities are allowed to deal with sign regulations differently. For example, Alamance 100
County doesn’t have some of the same standards we have with respect to setback and size of signs whereas Chapel 101
Hill, in certain circumstances, is more restrictive than we are currently. 102
103
James Lea: So it’s a county issue? 104
105
APPROVED 5/4/16
3
Michael Harvey: Well it’s a county and municipality issue. It is also a preference issue where communities adopt 106
regulations forwarding their own concepts of acceptability. 107
108
Tony Blake: Sounds like a DOT issue. 109
110
Michael Harvey: It’s a little bit of both. If the sign is on private property, DOT has no regulatory authority. We would. 111
Signs erected in a public right-of-way are their purview. 112
113
James Lea: So it looks like we’re going to put a regulation outlining what constitutes a flashing sign meaning a sign 114
can’t flash but only so often in a day correct. 115
116
Michael Harvey: Currently flashing, blinking signs are illegal. We are actually going to allow them so long as the 117
message only changes a certain amount of times in a given hour. They’re currently prohibited in Orange County. 118
We’re actually creating an allowance where you can have digital signage so long as the message doesn’t change but 119
a certain number of times an hour. Our problem currently is that we have no measureable standard to outline what is 120
and is not legal. 121
122
Michael Harvey continued presentation. 123
124
Tony Blake: Would it make more sense to base the square footage of the signage on the amount of road frontage or 125
the amount of area that’s visible to the public? I’m just kicking that around because it seems like this is somewhat 126
more arbitrary that what I would’ve expected and the other part of it is that you may be creating a market for signage. 127
If I’m only using 150 square feet of my signage, can I sell my signage allotment to someone else? 128
129
Michael Harvey: No, you can’t. 130
131
James Lea: What district does churches fall in on this table? 132
133
Michael Harvey: Churches are allowed in every (general use zoning) district we have. 134
135
James Lea: Because I know that some of them have nice signs that change. 136
137
Michael Harvey: For example, a church developed in the LC1 zoning district could have 172 square foot signage. A 138
church developed in the industrial district could have more signage. 139
140
Michael Harvey continued presentation. 141
142
Paul Guthrie: I think what would clarify and get focus on exactly where you’re going… Understand what this case did. 143
It was brought by a church that had no basic place for church services, so it moved around the community. They put 144
up temporary signs for a period of days, time where it was going to be each Sunday. And those weren’t taken down 145
over time and they got cited over time. That was the original cite. So they went in to court on both freedom of speech 146
and the fact that they were a church, and where the court got people in a pickle was this language, the sign content 147
based restrictions do not survive strict scrutiny because the town has not demonstrated that the code differentiation 148
between temporary directional signs and other types of signs further a compelling dominant interest and is narrowly 149
taled to that ending. That’s what he’s playing with right now. Is trying to meet that standard, and it’s a very tough 150
standard to meet. 151
152
Michael Harvey: Building on Paul’s point… The town’s ordinance (Reed versus Gilbert) said that if you have a 153
temporary sign announcing a special event you could have it up 72 hours before the event and has to be removed 154
within 24. If you have an off site directional sign it can only be up for 12 hours and has to be removed within the hour 155
the event ceases. So the issue was what is the sign this church is erecting. Is it a special event? No. Is it directional? 156
Yes, but it has this shelf life. So I, as the zoning officer, had to read the sign to determine what type of sign it was. 157
And enforce the ordinance appropriately. So I was basing my determination on content, not on the size of the sign, 158
not on what it was, or placement. And I was treating the signs of the same shape, size, everything different. Based on 159
APPROVED 5/4/16
4
the content of the wording. Our ordinance, with two or three notable exceptions, treated signage the same. It was 160
universally the same. And again, there are two or three exceptions to that where what I just said is incorrect, and 161
that’s precipitated all of these changes. But, the further problem is as James and I have gotten into it is you’re 162
establishing a standard based on the content. For example, if we said you’re allowed 8 square foot of signage on a 163
residential building if it has to convey hazardous material being store on site. 164
165
Tony Blake: That’s a bad example because that’s public safety. 166
167
Michael Harvey: Unfortunately, that’s not necessarily true. If you’re saying you can have this sign because it’s 168
conveying this message, that’s illegal. If you say you can have hazard identification signs that’s perfectly legitimate. 169
170
James Lea: So this ordinance now will be based on content. 171
172
Michael Harvey: It’s content neutral. Each district is going to be treated the same. Each land use in certain districts 173
are going to be treated the same. 174
175
Tony Blake: What’s your reason for treating the rural buffer different than our 1 or our 2? 176
177
Michael Harvey: Bluntly, it’s the rural buffer. It is by definition, by law, a less intensive district than our R1 and AR 178
zoning districts. And as a result, it has less allowable signage. 179
180
Lisa Stuckey: Try to expect more non-commercial 181
182
Michael Harvey: Correct… More single-family residential development versus any other allowed activity, yes… The 183
reason for the difference is because the inherent nature of the district is different than the other. 184
185
Lisa Stuckey: So that means that a sign for a temporary event is going to have the same status as a sign for a 186
permanent situation. You’re not able to make the distinction? 187
188
Michael Harvey: We can establish regulations for temporary signage, for temporary events. And there are still 189
standards that exist in here for that. But for example, what we have in here for the residential district is no sign on a 190
residential land use can be bigger than 12 square feet. We can’t even regulate political signs anymore. 191
192
Tony Blake: So the difference would be you could have your standard real estate sign out front and Sunday you’re 193
having an open house, you could put in a bigger open house sign and then that would have to come down? 194
195
Michael Harvey: Yes, because it’s a temporary component. 196
197
Michael Harvey continued presentation. 198
199
Maxecine Mitchell: So if I put a sign up and it said, “I hate all white people” you can’t come and tell me that I have to 200
take it down based on the content? 201
202
Michael Harvey: Correct. From a zoning stand point… Just because there’s a zoning component that says we don’t 203
regulate the content doesn’t mean that the sheriff’s department or law enforcement entities don’t have the authority to 204
say that you’re sign violates x,y, or z. This doesn’t eliminate or stop the enforcement of other applicable regulation. It 205
just says that the county, I, can’t drive down your road and say, “I don’t like that sign, it has to come up” based solely 206
on the message it conveys. 207
208
Maxecine Mitchell: One more question, Michael. I think we were talking about these topless bars and stuff, does that 209
mean they’ll be able to put up…? 210
211
Michael Harvey: This was actually a 6 week argument. I took the position, and after James and I looked at court 212
cases and we both agreed, that we could still say you cannot have a sign that contains lewd or lascivious letters, 213
APPROVED 5/4/16
5
words, displays, or characters. So you can’t have the adult cabaret or .. that has suggestive descriptive sign. You can 214
still have that regulation because there are actually court cases that say, you have the right as a community to not 215
allow this. We’re still allowing you to have your sign, but you can’t have lewd or lascivious displays or characters. 216
217
Michael Harvey continued presentation. 218
219
Craig Benedict: What could be an issue is you have the flag exemptions. If somebody flies a confederate flag, that’s 220
not listed. 221
222
Michael Harvey: Flags are the one issue that James and I are having a lot of… Craig is referring to page 36… 223
problems with. Currently this proposal says United States, State of North Carolina, Orange County flags are exempt 224
from regulations. It used to say flags, emblems or insignia of any national, state, or political subdivision. I don’t 225
consider the confederate flag to be a sign, I consider it to be a flag, I don’t think it’s an advertising material and I don’t 226
think it’s necessarily regulated by the sign ordinance. Whether or not I think the sign should or shouldn’t be flown is a 227
different discussion. But, this is where we get into a content problem. What happens when McDonalds has a 500 228
square foot flag that just has the big M on it? If you’re exempting flags… If the whole goal of the sign ordinance is to 229
say everyone is going to be operating from the same page in terms of allowable signage you do have to draw the line 230
somewhere. And what constitutes advertising and what doesn’t. 231
232
Tony Blake: Why can’t you regulate the size of the flag? 233
234
Michael Harvey: You could probably establish a regulation that says flags only of this size… 235
236
Tony Blake: Because over a certain size they do become an advertisement. They’re a focal point. 237
238
Michael Harvey: But I also would argue that if you say it’s 32 square feet of flag, why can’t I be patriotic and have a 239
64 square foot American flag. Why are you limiting my ability to fly a larger American flag? And then I lose the court 240
case on a totally different issue. 241
242
James Lea: Not to mention in a residential area. Can residents fly flags? If so, how big, what kind? 243
244
Lisa Stuckey: Also, you could have 22 flags. That’s a sign. 245
246
Michael Harvey: Again, I don’t think that… You have a banner that has a kitten hanging from a tree in your garden, 247
should I count that? I don’t think I should. 248
249
Paul Guthrie: I think limiting what you do with flags is probably a good idea. Because, for instance, you tell the 250
counsel general or Guatemala that he can’t fly the Guatemalan flag outside the consulate general’s office. Of course 251
not. 252
253
Michael Harvey: Well that’s a good example but it’s a good example for a different reason. I would argue that when 254
you have an embassy that’s not technically regulated under local law anyway. It’s covered in a diplomatic immunity. 255
256
Paul Guthrie: It’s immunity there but what do you say to a Quebec citizen who lives in Orange County and flies the 257
Quebec Flag? What do you say to them? The only thing you can do is you’re using content as the basis for your 258
regulation. 259
260
Kim Piracci: This is related to a question that keeps running through my head. Is there ever a problem with 261
differentiating art and signage? 262
263
Michael Harvey: I’m sure that there could be. What is it? If you have a piece of art that’s meant to convey an 264
advertising message, that’s content, what’s the purpose and intent of the structure? That’s where we always get into 265
a foul area of what do you do? And on page 36, you’ll notice we’ve added the golden arches. The golden arches at 266
APPROVED 5/4/16
6
McDonald’s are symbols and will be included in the computation of sign area. It’s a brand. So we would say that’s 267
part of the sign. 268
269
Paul Guthrie: Let me pose a similar thing. A couple of restaurants in Chapel Hill have commission on their walls 270
pieces of art that have a theme that makes you hungry and want to eat, outside, are they signs? 271
272
Michael Harvey: In my opinion it only becomes a sign if it says, “Eat at Spanky’s” whereas if you paint a mural that 273
has this wonderful scene of people eating but Spanky’s name isn’t in it, I don’t think it’s a sign. It’s a mural. It’s art. I 274
don’t think it ought to be regulated by this ordinance and I don’t think the County has any business trying to do that. 275
What I have told businesses in Orange County is, you want to paint the side of your building, paint it as a mural and 276
do some intricate design. Great, go for it. What you can’t do is exceed the sign allowance so if you have a 32 square 277
foot area where you say this that’s fine because that’s the sign limit, you just can’t turn your whole side of your 278
building into a billboard because that’s when I have to count the whole side of the building. 279
280
Lisa Stuckey: I do think within here there was one place that was very complicated. I think you lost track of which sub 281
a to sub b whatever and just want to encourage you to go through it very carefully. 282
283
Maxecine Mitchell: Have you spoke on community signs? 284
285
Michael Harvey: That’s actually going to be covered, if you’re doing a community/residential project like a subdivision 286
it’s going to be covered under the non-residential project development because while it is a residential subdivision we 287
count it as a non-residential project. So they get that allowance for a freestanding sign for the entry and then all the 288
signage for internal, like park this way or remember that road/street signs are exempt, construction entrance is going 289
to be exempt because it’s a directional sign. That’s required by the County. 290
291
Lisa Stuckey: But why is it called non-residential? 292
293
Michael Harvey: Truly, it’s either non-residential land uses or projects. A subdivision is a project. The individual 294
houses are residential development but the entity in and of itself is a project. 295
296
Tony Blake: What’s the criteria for turning the thing over to a community board or homeowners association? 297
298
Michael Harvey: Well for me, once the subdivision is built out, the roads are in, and the subdivision’s plated and here 299
it is, each individual lot is now going to be sold. It’s each individual lot that falls to residential development and those 300
limitations. The subdivision in and of itself exists as an entity. 301
302
Paul Guthrie: Michael, how do you handle communities that have homeowner associations and don’t have public 303
roads or signage? 304
305
Michael Harvey: Well, in this ordinance we’ve actually spelled out that if you’re erecting street signs in a private 306
subdivision those are exempt because they serve a public safety purpose. 307
308
309
310
311
AGENDA ITEM 8: COMMITTEE/ADVISORY BOARD REPORTS 312
A. Board of Adjustment 313
None 314
315
B. Orange County Transportation 316
317
Craig Benedict went over recent items from the OUTBoard and transportation division. 318
319
APPROVED 5/4/16
7
Tony Blake: The one I was interested in was Orange Grove Road cutting through to 70, and that would take some of 320
the pressure off Churton street in downtown Hillsborough. 321
322
Craig Benedict: We’re interested in the development that Hillsborough recently approved, Collin’s Ridge, a thousand 323
units that would be using that as the primary access point because that’s the only… And they have to get additional 324
right of way for that. We’re trying to see if some contributions by the developer could accelerate that road. 325
326
Paul Guthrie: Is the state still listing the train station… 327
328
Craig Benedict: Yes, it’s still on schedule. It’s not 2017, I think it’s 2019… That’s an important link and if we can 329
leverage all the money together it could accelerate that project. The developer of Colin’s Ridge was going to make 8 330
improvements on Churton by 2018 and 2022 Churton Street was going to be widened by DOT in 2023. And so our 331
recommendations from the county were, why don’t you take the money from the developer, give it to DOT and have 332
them bring the whole project forward instead of .. And reconstruction and the waste of those 8 improvements… And 333
we have a new finding that could make this even more feasible. They actually want to bend/change the curvature in 334
that area and so what they could do is while they’re building the new curvature which is shorter they can build the 335
tunnel before they build the track on top of it which is a lot cheaper and it doesn’t make the rail paranoid that you’re 336
tunneling underneath it in active traffic. That’s something that we just got recently. 337
338
Tony Blake: So one more question… I was reading today and I went to that meeting with the Chamber of Commerce 339
in Chapel Hill and there was some talk about this, they used to call it the EDGE… And so is there any movement 340
there in that joint planning area or is that still… 341
342
Craig Benedict: It’s Chapel Hill’s decision… They changed. It was JPA but last year they turned to… They asked for 343
comments from Orange County on that but the master plan developed had this wide range of approvals from 30% 344
residential to 70% residential so the impacts for that wide range is quite a difference so we said 30% residential and 345
70% non-residential tax base. It probably would be a good balance sheet for County purposes. 346
AGENDA ITEM 9: ADJOURNMENT 347
348
Motion to adjourn made by Lisa Stuckey. 349
___________________________________________
Lydia Wegman, Chair