Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOUTBoard agenda 111517AGENDA Orange Unified Transportation Board November 15, 2017 6:30 p.m. You can bring your laptops /tablets if you would like to use them. Conference Room 004 (Lower Floor) Orange County West Campus 131 West Margaret Lane, Hillsborough Time Item Title 6:30 1. Call to Order and Determination of Quorum 6:35 2. Approval of Minutes from September 20, 2017 6:40 3. Consideration of Additions to the Agenda 4. Special Presentations 5. Transit Services /Orange Public Transportation (OPT) This section of the agenda is addressed jointly by the OUTBoard and supplemental staff from other County departments (Aging; DSS; Housing, Human Rights and Community Development, Health, Child Support Enforcement, and the Library) to address transit services. 6:45 5.a Introduction of Allyson Coltrane, Transportation Demand Manager (TDM) for Orange County 6:50 5.b. Potential Initiatives for Alternative Transportation Options for Orange County (Allyson Coltrane) 7:05 5.c. OPT Quarterly Operational Updates (Theo Letman) i. New Service Date Projections • New fixed bus route - Orange Alamance Midday Connector route to be implemented by November 30, 2017. • Two additional fixed bus routes authorized — The Efland Hillsborough Commuter Loop and a County -wide "flexible" fixed route service. ii. New positions posted for OCPT iii. Community presentations by GoTriangle OUTBoard /Transit Services Action: Receive and review information, provide comments. 7:20 5.d. Transit Advisory Services JAS) Comments /Questions (Theo Letman, Peter Murphy): Opportunity for TAS members to offer transit related comments and ask questions regarding issues not on the agenda. OUTBoard /Transit Services Action: Provide comments and questions, receive feedback. 1 6.0 Regular OUTBoard Agenda (Action Items) 7:25 6.a. Bicycle Safety Implementation Subcommittee Report (Art Menius, Abigaile Pittman) OUTBoard Action: Receive information and provide any comments or direction that the Board might have. 7:35 6.b. Durham - Chapel Hill - Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Preferred Option — Public Comment Period (Nishith Trivedi) OUTBoard Action: Receive the presentation and provide any comments to the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) and Durham - Chapel Hill - Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization (DCHC MPO), if necessary. 7:45 6.c. Annual Report and Work Plan ( Abigaile Pittman) 7. Informational Items 8. Staff Updates 8:00 8.a. Orange County staff letter to Burlington- Graham MPO Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC) and Transportation Advisory Committee JAC) regarding process for submitting projects to NCDOT for review and scoring. 8:05 8.b. NCDOT project updates OUTBoard Action: Receive information and provide any comments that the Board might have. 9. Administrative 8:10 9.a. Election of New Chair /Vice - Chair: The terms for the current Chair and Vice Chair are concluding; new appointments are needed. OUTBoard Action: Vote on new Board Chair and Vice -Chair 8:20 9.b. 2018 Regular Meeting Calendar 8:25 10. Board Comments 8:30 11. Adjournment — The next regularly scheduled meeting date is December 20, 2017. Charge of the OUTBoard (from Section 1, Part C of the adopted Rules and Procedures) 1. The OUT Board is charged with advising the Board of County Commissioners on the planning and programming of transportation infrastructure improvements and other County transportation planning initiatives, as directed by the Board. 2. From time to time the OUT Board may be directed to provide input on regulations on which the Planning Board has primary statutory and local ordinance advisory duties. In such instances, the OUT Board shall serve in an advisory capacity to the Planning Board. Meetings (from Section IV, Part C of the adopted Rules and Procedures) C. Date, Time, and Location of Regular Meetings 3. Regular meetings of the OUT Board shall be held as needed to address items that require Board action consistent with its Charge and Duties identified herein. Meetings are held on the third Wednesday of the month. The start time and location of the meeting shall be included on the agenda and shall typically be 6:30 p.m. at the Orange County West Campus Office Building located at 131 West Margaret Lane, Hillsborough. The OUT Board Chair, in consultation with staff, shall have the authority to change the start time and location of a regular meeting to meet any special circumstances, provided the information is included on the distributed agenda. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 Item 2 DRAFT MINUTES ORANGE COUNTY OUTBOARD SEPTEMBER 21, 2017 REGULAR MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: Heidi Perry (Chair), At -Large Representative; Alex Castro (Vice- Chair), Bingham Township Representative; Ed Vaughn, Cedar Grove Township Representative; Brantley Wells, Hillsborough Township Representative; David Laudicina, Cheeks Township Representative; and Art Menius, At -Large Representative ; Erle Smith, Chapel Hill Township Representative; Gary Saunders, At -Large Representative; MEMBERS ABSENT: Jeff Charles, At -Large Representative; Ted Triebel, Little River Township Representative and Justin Miller, At- Large; Alyson West, At- Large; Jenn Sykes, At- Large; Donna Musson, Eno Township Representative; STAFF PRESENT: Abigaile Pittman, Transportation /Land Use Planner; Tom Altieri, Comprehensive Planning Supervisor; Meredith Kern, Administrative Assistant. OTHERS PRESENT FOR TRANSIT ADVISORY SERVICES: Andy Henry, DCHC MPO, Cherie Rosemond, Consultant, Department on Aging. AGENDA ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Heidi Perry called the meeting to order. AGENDA ITEM 2: APPROVAL OF MINUTES AUGUST 16, 2017 Heidi Perry moved the item to later in the meeting until a quorum was reached. AGENDA ITEM 3: CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONS TO AGENDA Abigaile Pittman stated that she will present some additional update items at the end of the meeting. AGENDA ITEM 4: SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS AGENDA ITEM 4A: DURHAM - CHAPEL HILL - CARRBORO METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (DCHC MPO) 2045 METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN (MTP) ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS Andy Henry from the DCHC MPO gave a presentation on the 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan. He started the presentation by going over the role of the MPO, why the MTP is important. He asked that the Board provide feedback at the end of the presentation. He noted that the BOCC will hear a similar presentation on October 3, 2017. This MPO provides transportation planning for Durham County, a portion of Orange County, and the northeast corner of Chatham County, covering urbanized areas determined by the most recent Census. Per federal mandate, MPOs channel federal funding. MPOs have a policy board composed of public officials from different counties and jurisdictions. Commissioner Barry Jacobs serves on the MPO Board for Orange County (his alternate is Commissioner Penny Rich). The MPO also has a Technical Committee made up of local planners who provide 5- year recommendations to the Board; Tom Altieri from Orange County serves in this capacity and others, and Mr. Henry works closely with this group. Mr. Henry continued with his presentation by going over a map of the MPO area (color- coded) and then started to discuss the repertoire of plans under the MPO. The Comprehensive Transportation Plan (shown by the red circle on the map) was adopted in May by the MPO, its first CTP. Now the focus is on creating a Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), a federal requirement. This plan has to show fiscal constraint, meaning that the costs must be covered by expected revenues, so there are a more limited number of projects than in the CTP (which is not fiscally constrained). The hatched area on the map shows where the MTP was used to 56 choose STPP projects. STPP or Strategic Transportation Prioritization Process is a gateway into NCDOT 57 methodology for funding projects in the transportation approval program. Funding plans are stretched out over 10 58 years, in these cases. The MTP lists highway transit and bicycle and pedestrian projects to address deficiencies 59 through the year 2045. The plan is based on future land use, population, employment and the travel demand model 60 (to be discussed later in the presentation), and a financial plan. Projects must be in the MTP to get federal funding to 61 then move into the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Planners used to use the MTP to reserve right -of- 62 way for future roadways. Mr. Henry reviewed the process of creating the MTP, breaking down various analyses, 63 projections, and the creating of key alternatives for addressing congestion. The MPO will release its draft, referred to 64 as its "preferred option," in October. This draft will go back out for public input, at which time the OUTBoard can also 65 make additional comments. The plan and report will likely be approved by December 2017 or January 2018. Another 66 part of the process is running the alternatives analysis in consideration of land use and transportation networks. The 67 alternatives are put through the Triangle Regional Model to see how well the alternatives meet future demand. The 68 alternatives are not presented singularly; projects will be taken out from the various alternatives for the final plan. Mr. 69 Henry went over the process of creating alternatives in more depth. He said that they take two land use scenarios; 70 one is the community plan, based on local comprehensive land use plans, and the other is the "aim high" plan where 71 higher density scenarios are examined in the urbanized areas, like around proposed light rail stations. These plans 72 are combined with a transportation network with lots of highway projects, along with one with fewer highway projects 73 and more transit, and then a network that balances highway and transit. These combinations inform the alternatives. 74 For land use, guide totals for population and employment are put into the land use model and then the model 75 distributes the population - employment around the counties to see where they think it will go. Looking at Orange 76 County, the population is currently about 139,000 people. In 2045 it is estimated to be 194,000, a 40 percent 77 increase. Employment -wise, there are currently about 64,000 jobs in Orange County. In 2045, there will be about 78 107,000 jobs, a 68 percent increase. Employment is increasing faster than population in Orange County, a pattern in 79 all the other counties in the MPO as well. 80 81 Erle Smith asked how Mr. Henry figured a 28 percent disparity between population growth and employment growth. 82 This suggests a pretty high unemployment rate. 83 84 Andy Henry answered that this figure is based on the growth rate. The County will continue to attract workers from 85 other counties . 86 87 Erle Smith said that Orange County was like a salary seat. 88 89 Andy Henry commented that it is evident in the mornings on NC -54 and 15 -501 with traffic being very high that a lot 90 of people are coming in to work at UNC and other places. 91 92 David Laudicina asked if the employment forecast takes into consideration what the Research Triangle is trying to do, 93 which is to add 110,000 new jobs, generating a huge amount of service jobs. 94 95 Andy Henry answered that the population total is from the NC demographer and is broken -out by county (20 year 96 projection). The MPO stretches that total out to 30 years to get its figures. The employment figures were from Woods 97 and Poole, a private company dealing with economic and demographic projections out to 2050. 98 99 David Laudicina said that those population projections could be conservative. 100 101 Andy Henry responded that upon revisiting some of the projection forecasts, sometimes the projections seem either 102 lower or higher, depending on what people expect. 103 104 Alex Castro asked why parts of Chatham County are included even though Chatham County is outside of the MPO. 105 106 Andy Henry responded that the MPO does include a small portion of Chatham County in its planning area. He added 107 that MPO models the whole Triangle region in two ways: the travel demand model and the land use model, inclusive 108 of 10 counties. The model extends to Siler City in Chatham County. 109 110 David Laudicina commented that Chatham County is planning to develop its whole northeastern quadrant with 111 60,000 new residents. 112 113 Andy Henry agreed that Chatham County's population is growing the fastest, especially around Pittsboro with a new 114 development called Chatham Park, and the existing Briar Chapel community. Chatham County has an agreement 115 with Cary about how far they can come into the County with planning. There are a lot of apartments and senior 116 housing in that area. 117 118 Art Menius commented on the 2013 population just for the portion in Chatham; it is about twice the entire population 119 for Chatham in the 1980 Census. 120 121 Andy Henry agreed that Chatham County is forecasted to grow pretty quickly. He continued his presentation. The 122 performance measures in the alternative analysis shows different data on measures such as the average minutes of 123 delay per person and mode share in a "no build" scenario. Travel isochrones show how far someone can travel in the 124 afternoon peak within 10 -20 -30 minutes (see contours on the maps in presentation) in centers heavy in commuting 125 traffic around the Triangle (especially in downtown Durham, Chapel Hill, Hillsborough, etc.). The idea is to show how 126 easy it is to commute. Travel time is also measured on roadway corridors like 1 -85 to look at travel time in a "no build" 127 scenario and the effects of building alternatives. Mr. Henry pointed out that even with improvements, travel time will 128 not recover. According to the model, if travel time is 20 minutes with the "no build" scenario, it may go down to 16 129 minutes even with costly improvements, but not much lower than that. The congestion map shows volume (V = 130 number of vehicles on the road) divided by capacity (C = how many vehicles road can handle). The map is color - 131 coded per percentage. The Level of Service at a 100 percent is a level of service "E," on an A -F range where "F" 132 (120 %) is traffic almost standing still and "A" is free - flowing. Therefore, a level "E" is pretty congested. The main 133 highway corridors are very congested as well as areas within Chapel Hill and around it, especially around Estes 134 Drive. 135 136 Heidi Perry asked if these maps are based off of single occupancy vehicles for each person, so when you think of 137 population growth, even with a "no build" scenario, you are talking about having more single occupancy vehicles. 138 139 Andy Henry said that he was glad Ms. Perry brought -up the "no build" scenario. The presentation is based on no 140 build, no further improvements with the 2045 population and employment on the model. However, it is not all single 141 occupancy vehicles; 10 —15% would not be single occupancy vehicles. 142 143 Heidi Perry asked if the current mode share is built -out too. 144 145 Andy Henry said that this is a difficult question to answer but the model does not take the current mode share. The 146 model has some behavior worked into it; it will change the mode share between single occupancy and multi - 147 occupancy. However, it does not change much; the model is not that sensitive. 148 149 Alex Castro asked who determines the parameters of the model. 150 151 Andy Henry said that there is a team that works on the model. The Triangle Regional Model has four partners: our 152 MPO, the Capital Area MPO, NCDOT, and Go Triangle. The partners provide financial investment and there is a 153 model team at NC State in the Institute for Transportation Research and Education (ITRE). 154 155 Alex Castro asked for clarification as to if there was a standard model used statewide. 156 157 Andy Henry replied that there is not a standard model. 158 159 Alex Castro asked if the model is just used by the region. 160 161 Andy Henry confirmed this. He said that there is a statewide model but it just does the main roads. Regions use the 162 statewide model to help inform the goings -on outside of the model area regarding trends and changes. 163 164 Heidi Perry asked if Mr. Henry has looked at previous projections to see how they played out. 7 165 166 Andy Henry said that he had not done this but that an intern could help with this sort of research. He continued his 167 presentation and discussed conclusions from the alternatives. He said that Orange County will continue to have brisk 168 employment growth and will attract employers and commuters from the outlying counties. The alternatives show 169 significant improvements in travel in the "no build" scenario, but there is still quite a bit of congestion. Travel time will 170 increase even with roadway improvements beyond the budget. The alternatives applied to the model include 171 improvements to highway and transit projects, more than is allocated in the budget, but congestion would still not 172 come down to today's levels. Mr. Henry discussed the next part in the presentation and said that in regard to transit 173 investments in light rail on a regional level; sometimes it is hard to detect movement in mode share. A closer look to 174 areas around rail and transit lines and rail stations shows that there are significant mode shifts, especially in walking 175 and biking (increase 3 or 4 times). This can get diluted in performance measures for the whole region, but investment 176 in specific areas makes a big difference. 177 178 Alex Castro asked about how "non- motorized" was defined. Light rail and other transit have motors? 179 180 Andy Henry clarified that non - motorized refers to bicycling and walking. The reason he used this language was 181 because the model does not distinguish the two. He will take this wording out in future presentations and just say 182 walking and bicycling and refer to pedestrians. He continued with his presentation and discussed high density and 183 mixed land uses in rail station areas increases non - motorized modes and increases travel time. He said that when 184 the team ran different alternatives with a more intense land use — "aim high" - and the same transportation network, 185 the "aim high" had improvements across the board with less congestion and fewer miles traveled, better mode shift to 186 bicycling and walking. 187 188 Alex Castro asked how multi -modal journeys were considered as an element. Is the last mile and first mile types of 189 approach used? For example, Heidi might bike to the train station, put her bike on the train, when she gets there, she 190 goes back on a bike. 191 192 Andy Henry said that he is not sure but sometimes performance measures will count each mode and in some ways, 193 only the main travel mode will be counted. He said that Mr. Castro makes a good point that there is a difference in 194 multi - modal. This dynamic works with number of trips as well. If someone drives to a transit station, gets on transit, 195 and gets off and walks, there are 3 modes and 3 trips. 196 197 Heidi Perry asked if driving to the transit station counts as a mode. 198 199 Andy Henry answered that usually transit is just counted but that the drive is counted in other ways as different trips. 200 201 Art Menius asked if Mr. Henry had maps for the 4 alternatives. 202 203 Andy Henry replied that he does and noted a link to a webpage (bottom of the page, end of presentation) for the MTP 204 which shows the interactive maps in the deficiency analysis. There are also maps in the alternatives section. 205 206 Heidi Perry said that she had a question regarding the way transit is counted. If a person drives to a transit station, 207 the presumption is that the person will get on transit, likely the bus. If this travel is only counted for transit, is it not a 208 false statement that this travel frees -up traffic on the road? Are cars being counted as cars? 209 210 Andy Henry responded that he thought that the car is still being counted. He equated the of the highway link where a 211 trip is calculated by volume over capacity, the car is still counted in the trip in the models used. Mr. Henry showed the 212 Board sample projects in Orange County, the widening of I -85 and I -40, safety improvements and capacity building to 213 Fordham Blvd., Churton Street in Hillsborough, NC -54W (study being done on corridor), and other such projects. 214 Some of the roadways noted here would include a set of collector streets (behind Daniel Boone Village), out to Mayo 215 Street, but he thinks that Hillsborough Road and Greensboro Street may see sidewalk improvements, modernize 216 Estes Drive with bicycle lanes and sidewalks slated in the funding plan called the TIP. See color -code on map in the 217 presentation for visual and more details. Mr. Henry discussed intersection improvements and super streets on NC -54 218 headed east from Chapel Hill. He said that the concept of a super street is a main road that limits left turns into the 219 intersection. A vehicle has to go past the intersection and make a U -turn down the road to turn around, see /drive 11 220 Fordham Blvd. near Erwin Road as an example of a super street. This design makes it so a road does not have to be 221 widened for turn lanes. Next, Mr. Henry went over slides on bus rapid transit for North -South routes from Eubanks 222 Rd. to Southern Village and to UNC Hospitals (shows some areas with grade separation); Durham - Orange Light Rail 223 Transit going from UNC Hospitals over to NC Central University and Duke University and down NC -54; and the 224 train /Amtrak station in Hillsborough (not listed but was discussed in the presentation). 225 226 Alex Castro asked why there is not consideration of a commuter rail along that rail line. 227 228 David Laudicina said that there are future plans for this. 229 230 Andy Henry answered that yes, the commuter rail is in the CTP, but will not likely be in the MTP because of the 231 amount of funding it needs. Theoretically, it will go down through Raleigh and will stop in west Durham. 232 233 David Laudicina spoke about train limitations due to the single track in that area. 234 235 Andy Henry said that the details are being worked out. 236 237 David Laudicina said that having a train or two run in the morning and in the evening to extend it out for commuters 238 would be a good plan. 239 240 Andy Henry said that this is the beginning of project development in the long range plan. There will be an in -depth 241 analysis beyond the regional area models shown in this presentation. 242 243 Alex Castro said that there is a good case study in New Mexico where a couple of trains run from Albuquerque to the 244 capital, Santa Fe, and it is with just a few trains on which workers commute to the state capital. 245 246 Gary Saunders said that in Orange County, the rail lines are owned CSX which looked at its profile of freight trains 247 and were pleased that scheduling did not seem as difficult as first thought. 248 249 David Laudicina said that he thought that the rail is owned by North Carolina Railroad. 250 251 Andy Henry said that CSX leases to North Carolina Railroad but CSX has the right. 252 253 David Laudicina said that freight always wins. 254 255 Gary Saunders agreed and said that this is why CSX was looking into the dynamic between freight and passenger 256 trains. 257 258 David Laudicina and Alex Castro gave other examples of commuter trains being figured out alongside freight trains in 259 Philadelphia and in northern Virginia. 260 261 Andy Henry said that the transit plan in the presentation is based on the Durham County and Orange County transit 262 plans. There is also funding for increased and resources towards bus service hours, park and ride facilities and 263 vehicles. He concluded his presentation by pointing Board members to Attachment 4 which shows projects that have 264 changed since the packet was put together a few weeks ago. For example, Eno Mountain Rd. shows an air quality 265 year of 2060 but it may be included in the 2045 MTP draft plans; Estes Drive and Seawell School Rd. will undergo a 266 modernization; Eubanks Road will be widened from MLK Blvd. to Millhouse Road; collector streets near Daniel 267 Boone Village will be in the 2045 Plan; and Mt. Carmel Church Rd. from 15 -501 to Old Lystra will undergo 268 modernization as well. 269 *Note: Board members are advised to check with Mr. Henry for more details beyond these minutes since these 270 updates to the packet may not be all inclusive. 271 272 Heidi Perry asked about cost per mile for the road widening of 1 -40 and 1 -85. She said that there is no length to the 273 project listed. 274 9 275 Andy Henry said that he would estimate that it is 20 to 30 million dollars per mile to widen an interstate highway. 276 277 Gary Saunders said that the first widening is 4 miles for the managed lanes, Exit 270 and 266 (15 -501 to 86). This 278 was later corrected to Exit 266 to 259, 7 miles. 279 280 Andy Henry said that for 4 miles, and if the widening is priced at $30 million, it would be about $7 -8 million per mile, 281 which is less than he thought it would cost. The subject area has no interchanges. 282 283 Gary Saunders said that there is one bridge on that stretch. 284 285 Andy Henry said that from 15 -501 to NC 86 goes from 4 to 6 lanes. 286 287 Heidi Perry said that she thought the discussion was about managed lanes. 288 289 Andy Henry replied that the managed lane plans will not be in the upcoming plans. The number of interchanges 290 increases the price for widening. The managed lanes area is a more rural area and will not be as costly. Sunrise Rd. 291 and Erwin Rd., one of the areas to be widened, go over 1 -40 and the bridges will have to be improved. 292 293 Heidi Perry asked about how Mr. Henry picks parts of alternatives for each plan. 294 295 Andy Henry answered that the alternatives are not mutually exclusive. Many of the projects are the same, like a 296 project he called "moderate" which used the 2040 MTP and another project called "highway." He added highway 297 projects to the 2040 MTP, e.g. widening 1 -85. The transportation network for each of these alternatives is likely going 298 to be the same. 299 300 Heidi Perry remembered a project that was much heavier on transit. 301 302 Andy Henry replied that the project that was heavier on transit had an extension of light rail to Carrboro and extended 303 the commuter rail from west Durham to Mebane /Burlington. In this project, there was a 15 minute headway for the 304 bus frequency. 305 306 Heidi Perry asked why this would not be in a plan presented for a vote. She said that at a recent meeting, the MPO 307 group was given 4 fiscal budgets to look at and there was a conservative, moderate and two optimistic budgets. The 308 MPO wanted to focus only on optimistic budgets. Who gets to decide if transit is going to be the priority? 309 310 Andy Henry said that the MPO decides if the major routes will come down headways or if all routes are done on 15 311 minute headways. The question is, is there a budget to do this and is there payback? Transit -heavy alternatives have 312 a lot of transit service hours in them and mode share tops -out at a certain point, no one else is taking transit, even 313 though bus service is up high. 314 315 Heidi Perry asked if it was the case that the budget could not be used for incentives for people not to drive, or 316 leveraged with a public - private partnership. 317 318 Andy Henry said that some of the budget is used in this way. He said the aforementioned projects are classified as 319 more minor in comparison to widening of highways. There is a budget for long range planning for travel demand 320 management, a program coordinated by Triangle J Council of Governments and contributed to by local MPOs, 321 NCDOT, and GoTriangle helps coordination with businesses and other partners. Additionally, there is a budget for 322 transit system management inclusive of improvements on intersections; and a budget for intelligent transportation 323 systems for smart traffic signals and such. 324 325 Alex Castro said that he noticed the absence in the presentation on the advancement of technology. Automotive 326 technology can be controlled. Major cities have high occupancy wherein use of the road is a privilege. A transponder 327 could lock your vehicle to go at the same speed. His point is that this technology is coming (Austin - Dallas is trying 328 this out). The idea that "what we plan may not be what we build" should be taken into account, like the widening of 10 329 the road projects matched with the innovations in technology may not be envisioned in the same way that they are 330 today. 331 332 Andy Henry said that the final chapter of the plan will talk about vehicles that communicate with each other, 333 autonomous vehicles, but this is not in the model because they have not been able to observe the behavior of these 334 vehicles. Plans updated every 4 years, so once they know more, the plan will be updated, but these advances still 335 seem too far out. There are many debates regarding how this will play out that Mr. Henry has been hearing, like the 336 idea that urban environments could be denser with autonomous vehicles on the roads, or perhaps people will live in 337 rural environments and use the commute to do work while their car is driving into more urban environments. Future 338 models will incorporate ITS. 339 340 Alex Castro recommended that the MPO get involved with ITS - American to get into planning and the studying of 341 trends to get an idea of how this is moving and how that will impact our planning. 342 343 David Laudicina wondered if autonomous vehicles would really lead to give less traffic. 344 345 Heidi Perry said that if they were going at same speed they would travel more smoothly. 346 347 David Laudicina thought that connected vehicles would help on interstate and faster roads, though the vehicles could 348 be hacked. 349 350 Andy Henry said people still need to have a vehicle, it still has to come and pick up the passenger /owner, it will still 351 be on the road, maybe it will park farther away from downtown and parking needs will change. We will see over time. 352 Mr. Henry thanked the Board for its time and attention to his presentation. 353 354 Abigaile advised the Chair to return to the review of the minutes. 355 356 Tom Altieri referred to Andy Henry's note that the BOCC would receive a similar presentation on October 3, 2017. 357 The BOCC will then have the opportunity to put together some comments and will send them to the MPO. Tonight's 358 meeting gives an opportunity for the OUTBoard to get any comments to the BOCC when it hears presentation. There 359 is also a meeting October 2, 2017 among three of our elected officials who are representatives on the MPO Board, 360 Commissioners Jacobs, and Rich, and Marcoplos (not officially a representative for the MPO) will also be joined by a 361 representative from the County Manager's Office, Theo Letman from OPT, and a few County planners as well to form 362 a work group. Since there is a lot to absorb with the MTP, this meeting will provide time for getting an early start on 363 looking at the table (the full segments to the table will be added to the materials). The OUTBoard can provide 364 comments to this work group for moving forward. The Chair of the OUTBoard, Heidi Perry, is unable to attend but 365 Abigaile Pittman will be attending. Alex Castro, Vice Chair is also available to attend. 366 367 Alex Castro said that Abigaile Pittman had provided to the Board this past June information on an MPO presentation 368 on managed motorways. He compared parts of that presentation to the case of Australia where they are controlling 369 motorways and how that is being developed. 370 371 Heidi Perry requested updates in the spreadsheet. 372 373 Tom Altieri said that any updates would be shared with the group. 374 375 Heidi Perry said that she wants mileage to be added and a column that says what benefit a project is bringing (i.e. 376 adding 2 lanes to an interstate for $30 million, what are you getting for it? If these changes save 5 minutes each day, 377 how does that translate and is it worth it ?). 378 379 Tom Altieri asked Andy Henry if Ms. Perry's requested updates could be broken out in the table. He noted that travel 380 time savings is run on the entire network but asked about the possibility for doing a breakout for individual factors. 381 382 Andy Henry replied that each project could not be broken out like this but that for some of them, a travel time index 383 could be updated with a cost per hour and delays; these calculations are for key corridors, the interstate. 11 384 385 Heidi Perry said that there could be an asterisk noting how these configurations include many factors. How many 386 minutes could be saved on a commute? She is skeptical that adding a lane could only temporarily reduce congestion 387 or does it make it easier to add to the problem. 388 389 Gary Saunders, Heidi Perry and David Laudicina discussed traffic on Friday nights and how bus drivers find various 390 ways of getting through traffic around the area and save /make -up time during routes. 391 392 Heidi Perry asked if anyone has any comments they want Tom Altieri to take to the BOCC and /or work group. 393 394 Alex Castro said that the BOCC and work group need to be vigilant in terms of technology and communications and 395 autonomous vehicles. Additionally, the modeling on population across generations should be considered; it is his 396 understanding that millennials prefer to live in urban areas and may not buy cars. He said that we need to see what 397 the future will be like, not employ a 1950s mentality to any of the issues at hand. 398 399 David Laudicina added that millennials' preferences may change based on life circumstances as they get older. 400 401 Heidi Perry said that she would like to see a presentation on how the models in Mr. Henry's presentation are created. 402 403 Tom Altieri said that there are 2 models; Community Viz places the forecasted population and employment on the 404 ground, which feeds into the Triangle Regional Model. In the past, there have been representatives from the County 405 on the staff group that works with Community Viz but not with the group on the Triangle Regional Model at this time. 406 If there are any additional comments, please send comments to him directly or to Abigaile Pittman. 407 408 Heidi Perry went back to Agenda Item 2 to approve the Minutes. She asked if there were any corrections. Hearing 409 none, Ms. Perry asked for a motion to approve the minutes. 410 411 MOTION: Alex Castro moved to approve the minutes. Seconded by Art Menius. 412 413 VOTE: UNANIMOUS 414 415 AGENDA ITEM 5: REGULAR OUTBOARD AGENDA (ACTION ITEMS) 416 417 AGENDA ITEM 5A. BICYCLE SAFETY IMPLEMENTATION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT (ART MEWS, ABIGAILE PITTMAN) 418 419 Abigaile Pittman said that the purpose of this is to receive the report from the Bicycle Safety Implementation 420 Subcommittee and to provide any comments or suggestions from the OUTBoard. Art Menius is the chair of the 421 Subcommittee. Ms. Pittman passed out a copy of her presentation. 422 423 Art Menius noted that in the packet, the meeting notes from August 23, 2017 start on page 34 and continue on page 424 41 with other notes from another meeting (stapling discrepancy). Comments were made to Melissa Blackburn on the 425 logo emphasizing that there be people in the logo, not just vehicles. She had 16 logo suggestions, narrowed down to 426 3 at the September 11, 2017 meeting. Peter Leousis from the original Bicycle Safety Taskforce attended the August 427 23rd and September 111h meeting; Bonnie Hauser attended the September 111h meeting. 428 429 430 Art Menius said that he was elected chair of the Bicycle Safety Implementation Subcommittee at the August 23rd 431 meeting. The Subcommittee has $10,000 in funding from the General Fund and $5,000 from the Visitor's Bureau.. 432 The Subcommittee will create a budget at their next meeting on October 41h. Laurie Paolicelli from the Convention 433 and Visitor's Bureau informed the Subcommittee of the variety of resources at their disposal, including access to 434 media outlets and print sources for advertising space available pro bono and for purchase out of the $5,000 budget. 435 Todd McGee, Director of Community Relations will help with a Facebook page, Twitter account, and website, to get 436 the word out about the Subcommittee and its work. Melissa Blackburn, Graphic Designer, will provide guidance on 437 the arts and communications and design the website. The Subcommittee wants to do a video contest among the 438 schools for a safety video to get PSAs out there. The Subcommittee narrowed down the logo design options to 3 12 439 logos; Melissa will start creating design options. Bonnie Hauser brought up a good point that the Subcommittee's 440 initiative being unique because it looks at both bicycle and automotive safety, a collaborative safety project. 441 442 Abigaile Pittman said that Melissa just sent her 8 revised logo designs for the Subcommittee to review. 443 444 Art Menius responded that he looked forward to seeing the designs. He also said that Brennan Bouma, the 445 Sustainability Coordinator, talked to the Subcommittee about what he could do, along with the new the 446 Transportation Demand Coordinator. Through GoTriangle, they could come -up with logo- branded items like rear 447 lights, spoke lights, mobile phone cases, wallets, cooling towels, and stickers to get out the "ride safe" message. As 448 homework, Subcommittee members are reviewing videos from the United Kingdom, etc. to inform their video 449 contest idea. The Subcommittee's idea is to have one video contest open to school children and perhaps one video 450 contest open to anyone. Peter Murphy talked to the video clubs and looked into video programming at Orange High 451 and Cedar Ridge. Cedar Ridge has the capacity for this. Allison West passed out 9 examples of artwork used in 452 safety campaigns, and the Subcommittee continued to discuss how they can humanize the campaign. Mr. Menius 453 developed a list of menu text and content for the website Melissa Blackburn will be designing for the committee. 454 Abigaile Pittman was going to reach out to NCDOT. 455 456 Abigaile Pittman reported back about her conversation with Chuck Edwards of NCDOT who said that the County 457 can install bicycle safety signs along NCDOT routes by way of encroachment agreements. The County would be 458 responsible for the cost of design, construction, installation and maintenance. Prior to installation of the signs, the 459 BOCC requires a resolution of approval and NCDOT has to review and approve the sign design and locations. The 460 design has to comply with MUTCD and NCDOT requirements and signs have to be located independently from 461 highway signs. The proposed signs would undergo a comparable review process as the green and white "welcome 462 signs" along NCDOT routes. Ms. Pittman was not sure if the signs would be state maintained. Commissioner Barry 463 Jacobs worked with NCDOT to request signs saying "Rural Buffer," and an idea had been suggested to create a 464 dual bicycle safety message on those signs. 465 466 Heidi Perry asked about why people should know that they are entering the Rural Buffer. 467 468 Abigaile Pittman replied that she thought that Barry Jacobs felt that people should know that it exists and that it 469 signals lower density development. 470 471 Alex Castro talked about existing signs identifying the various routes (Route 1, Route 2, etc.). Are these considered 472 to be highway signs where other signs cannot be co- located? 473 474 Abigaile Pittman answered yes. Signs can be placed near it but not on a shared pole. Since the entering Rural 475 Buffer signs are not highway signs, they could perhaps share a message where underneath Rural Buffer it would 476 say "Ride Friendly, Drive Friendly" in some locations. 477 478 Art Menius said he thought this was a great idea. Mr. Menius said that the Subcommittee was also looking at 479 additional funding opportunities to augment the $15,000. There are grants available with Carolina Tarwheels, with 480 NCDOT program for children in low income households, and with the Sheriff's Department. 481 482 Abigaile Pittman spoke about the Sherriff's Office about their involvement and they want to get onboard and can 483 help with grants. 484 485 Art Menius said that Ms. Pittman found State Farm safety initiatives and Mr. Menius found more information from 486 Kim, the administrator of the program in NC, who suggested to apply for a grant next spring (even though they do 487 not fund single county operations). The grant is competitive and takes the form of a contest; participating in it would 488 show competitive standing with a national set of bicycle groups. The grant is $25,000. If there was a health - related 489 campaign, BCBS could be a funder. The October 41h Subcommittee meeting will cover more potential funder ideas, 490 update the web contest, Heidi Perry will send video links for Melissa Blackburn; Abigaile Pittman will look into AAA 491 and BCBS funding, and Peter Leousis is following -up with Cedar Ridge on the video contest. 492 13 493 Abigaile Pittman noted that Todd Jones is coming to the upcoming meeting to talk about market testing for the final 494 logo options 495 496 Heidi Perry asked if anyone has any questions. Hearing none she moved forward on the agenda. 497 498 AGENDA ITEM 6: INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 499 500 AGENDA ITEM 7: STAFF UPDATES 501 502 7A. STAFF UPDATE ON THE CONCEPT OF A PROJECT TO INCLUDE BICYCLE SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS ON OLD NC 86, 503 INCLUDING THE INTERSECTION OF OLD NC 86 AND HOMESTEAD RD /DAIRYLAND RD (ABIGAILE PITTMAN) 504 505 Abigaile Pittman guided the Board to page 47 of the Agenda Packet. There is a developing project proposal that 506 relates to this. She recalled that the OUTBoard had questions at the April and August Board meetings about the 507 roundabouts at intersection of Old NC 86 and Homestead Rd. /Dairyland Rd. The main question was if a feasibility 508 study could be done about bicycle lanes. The OUTBoard voted on April 191h to add the concept of a Calvander 509 roundabout proposal to the projects in the 2020 -2029 Statewide Transportation Improvements Program (STIP). The 510 BOCC approved the proposed project list with that revision on May 2, 2017. Heidi Perry inquired about the feasibility 511 study of bike lanes from Carrboro to Hillsborough, inclusive of the roundabout project. While this proposal was being 512 reviewed there was a corresponding conversation between NCDOT, the Town of Carrboro, and the MPO for a 513 highway project inclusive of bicycle safety improvements on Old NC 86 between Homestead Road and Old 514 Fayetteville Road. She noted the map on page 50 showing the boundaries of the proposed project and read the 515 description aloud. There is a chunk of this roadway that will be 3 lanes with bike lane paved shoulders; not full bike 516 lanes, but this was NCDOT's and the MPO's response to bicycle safety in this section of Old NC 86. 517 518 Heidi Perry asked if the proposal had already gone through the funding process. 519 520 Abigaile Pittman answered that no, it has not. 521 522 Heidi Perry said that Tina Moon in Carrboro relayed that initially this was presented to the MPO for STPP funding but 523 NCDOT and the MPO wants to control the design part. There are some places along this stretch where you do not 524 want to have extra bike lanes. 525 526 Abigaile Pittman said that she had a somewhat different conversation with Ed Lewis. He stated that the concept was 527 to have some bike lanes, have some turn lanes, but the exact location will have to be designed. 528 529 Heidi Perry agreed and said that this does not mean there will be a roundabout but rather that the intersection will be 530 improved. 531 532 533 7B. STAFF UPDATE ON THE ORANGE COUNTY PROCESS TO SUBMIT PROJECTS TO MPOS /RPOS (ABIGAILE PITTMAN) 534 535 Abigaile Pittman reviewed the abstract. She that Andy Henry's presentation mostly addressed this item but to clarify 536 further - each MPO and RPO work with member jurisdictions like Orange County and they create proposed project 537 lists to submit to NCDOT. The process is in its fourth iteration which occurs every 2 years and is now beginning its 538 5th cycle of the Strategic Transportation Prioritization Process. Orange County belongs to two urban MPO groups 539 including Durham - Chapel Hill- Carrboro, and Burlington- Graham ;and a rural RPO group with the Triangle Area Rural 540 Planning Organization. We prepare a draft list as everything changes a bit along the way. Current Orange County 541 project lists are substantially similar to the items on the last iteration. New local projects include the Daniel Boone 542 area and Mayo area. The preliminary project list first comes to the OUTBoard for consideration. The OUTBoard then 543 forwards that list to the BOCC. The BOCC approves the list for further consideration with the MPO and the RPO. 544 Sometimes items on the list do not get scored and do not make it into the TIP list. The timing of project submission is 545 determined by the MPO and RPOs in coordination with NCDOT. See page 53 in the packet for the timeline and list. 546 This 41h iteration will get approval and funding in December 2018 - January 2019 by the state Board of Transportation. 547 Ms. Pittman said she wanted to make sure OUTBoard members understood the process and point of reference. 14 548 549 Heidi Perry said that she thought this explanation was very useful. 550 551 Abigaile Pittman said that the OUTBoard will continue to get updates and continue to be asked to contribute because 552 this cycling process has many moving parts. Because we are still early in the process, the Calvander project could be 553 changed out because scoring had not started yet. Scoring starts on the state level, then regional projects and then 554 divisional items. 555 556 8. CONSIDERATIONS OF ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA 557 558 Abigaile Pittman provided an update from Pat Wilson at NCDOT that the design for the fencing project on the Orange 559 Grove Rd. bridge over 1 -40 is complete. Bids are going out in October, construction is supposed to start in November 560 and the project is slated to be completed in December 2017. She said that NCDOT also provided an update that they 561 lowered the speed limit on Orange Grove Rd. from 45 miles per hour to 40 mph. The concept for additional signage, 562 warning lights, and pavement markings for pedestrians on the bridge has not yet been addressed. Discussions 563 around a sidewalk agreement between Orange County and Hillsborough are still ongoing. 564 Alex Castro asked if there is an existing easement along the Orange Grove Road. 565 566 Abigaile Pittman said that there is not an existing sidewalk easement along Orange Grove Road; however, the 567 existing right -of -way from Grady Brown Road to Patriot's Point is being researched. 568 Heidi Perry commented that it would be a good thing to have a sidewalk agreement in place regardless of this 569 particular spot so they could use it when necessary. 570 571 Abigaile Pittman said that sidewalk encroachment agreements are not County -wide but address a specific, defined 572 location. 573 574 Brantley Wells said that he has some surveys on this area from a project done on the other side of the street. 575 576 Abigaile Pittman said that sidewalks might not be possible along this section of the road due to lack of right -of -way, 577 funding; however, some safety improvements might be possible in the near future, such as as adding pavement at 578 the northwest corner of New Grady Brown and Orange Grove Church Road Where vehicles go off road. The buses 579 turning here get create a muddy rut. When it rains, school children go out in the middle of the street to avoid the mud. 580 Further improvements could include widening the shoulder and pavement on the north side of Grady Brown across 581 from the high school frontage; and to put a crosswalk between the schools. These additions would pair well with the 582 bridge safety project. Several of these improvements are included in the Safe Routes to School Plan. 583 Alex Castro stated that he sees the Safe Routes to School Plan recommended projects as a continuum to the 584 improvements on the Orange Grove Rd. bridge. 585 586 MOTION made by Alex Castro that the OUTBoard endorse the recommended improvements included in the Safe 587 Routes to School Plan to be in coordination with the NCDOT planned resurfacing project for New Grady Brown Road, 588 and that this project schedule be advanced from 2020 to 2018. The Motion was second by Erle Smith. 589 VOTE: UNANIMOUS 590 591 AGENDA ITEM 8: BOARD COMMENTS 592 593 Heidi Perry said that she went to the BOCC meeting last night where they were discussing the Mountains to Sea Trail 594 plans She said that they opened -up a dialogue about how far behind Orange County's is with regard to greenway 595 construction, compared to Durham and Wake counties. 596 597 AGENDA ITEM 9: ADJOURNMENT 598 599 OUTBoard meeting was adjourned by consensus. 600 601 15 Heidi Perry, Chair 16 Item: 5.c. ORANGE COUNTY ORANGE UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION BOARD (OUTBoard) ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: November 15, 2017 Action Agenda Item No. 5.c. SUBJECT: OCPT Operational Updates DEPARTMENT: Orange County Public Transportation ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: 1. Orange Alamance Map Theo Letman, Transit Director 2. Orange Alamance Route Brochure 919 - 245 -2007 PURPOSE: To receive an update of OPT major operational updates BACKGROUND: New Service: Orange County Public Transportation (OCPT) currently operates two fixed routes: the Hillsborough Circulator and the Orange — Chapel Hill Connector route. OCPT has been authorized to implement 3 additional bus routes: Orange Alamance Midday route, the Efland Hillsborough Commuter Loop and a County wide "flexible" Fixed Route service. The Orange Alamance Midday Connector is scheduled to be implemented by 30 Nov 2017. Bus operators (hired as a result of recent budget approval) have successfully completed new hire training and are being trained on the new routes. Marketing of the new service is beginning with the release of our new route map and brochures (see Attachments 1 and 2). RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends the OUTBoard: 1. Receive and review the information; and provide feedback. 17 � Mo o%O wo% % m". CD AJpwwl p z z; 0 z ' 0 uj � m as W r 4a /KO110HNooa9 � � �auuuuuuul � u EFIANO CEDAR GROPE R G o � wao VVI� R \GHMON RD m m O��RO lip� 0 t4 14%5 O 'nnmi Na N CD 0 t G d Z d O. O. O N C d S c > d 7 d S 0 O C N 0 w O w u m a a > M a � Z u i N Y 3 — 3 _T 3 C O Q CL O n � Y s c s• . N s � C � O s� n.3 0 o � 4,� ,c � v L O L L i H T S � O i c) O � N O a� C '0 -oaj V aj Q 4J C O o, cu U c v c c L CU j 6 N a ' d) + N O U O } O U U W ,_2 0 r" 0 � n Y O D O W O L ru N C � _ O L N � v U ,n O Z p v � � CU CU v'f LL Y O L Q O 1 "Wfi Os U ^ f Z V — i N a.., V = > E 0) O i o i 3 O 0) o a1 i o i V N Ln cc t E +J ° N o ro cn N ° 0 ra Ouuuuuuuuuluuullll V o jjlll� i LU LL {/) O N D LL Ln V v N 'i � 0 ii N 2 N N N N N m ON m m m O 1711 N j %1 or% 0 00 m m 0 o f o 0 0 O O O /';;i O O O 'l i °- ul6'w I III IIIIIIIIII� in n rtu O O ON C) nj O O o O O O O N uU>Iyyyy i °- ul6'w I III IIIIIIIIII� in n rtu In m O N ax, 'rest )<l�R 19h rl N ' 0 - II I� IIIIIIIII '00001" y 00 �jll1B � 0 O �dff�l10 o o z /�� � o o *ANMOO i 'o o v � �uBNtturw�j0 � 3 � .S t c Qom; o ash O C O O N O s U - Z � v -0 O v] CU 7 U r v cu c � Q tJ U aj � J U L s > O o� Z p 0 0 0 - N = m , Ns• O � O W O on H Y N v ' U O -Cc: E U U W C O � N aj a = L v Ln Ln ° a) ; ui „n�iuti Y �u "acs O C O_ v � ji� IIrr!I'�YY4NIIYIIII' ub�WSMI O O O O O O ^n m m N ul6'w I III in n rtu In m O N N 'rest 19h rl N O O O O O O ^n m m N ul6'w I III in n rtu In m O N N O O O O O O ^n m m N O N Item 6.a. OUTBOARD BICYCLE SAFETY IMPLEMENTATION SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING NOTES OCTOBER 4, 2017 2:30 P.M. — 4:30 P.M. ROOM 204, PLANNING DEPARTMENT WEST CAMPUS OFFICE BUILDING 131 WEST MARGARET LANE, HILLSBORUGH, NC 27278 SUBCOMMITTEE MEMBERS ATTENDING: Heidi Perry, Art Menius, Alyson West OTHER CITIZENS ATTENDING: Peter Leousis and Todd Jones (members of the former BSTF) PLANNING STAFF ATTENDING: Abigaile Pittman, Transportation /Land Use Planner COMMUNITY RELATIONS STAFF ATTENDING: Melissa Blackburn, Graphic Designer /Assistant Webmaster, and Todd McGee, Community Relations Director A. Administrative Issues 1. Review and approval of Meeting Notes from September 11, 2017. Chair Art Menius asked if anyone had any comments or revisions on the September 11th meeting notes. There were none. A motion to approve the meeting notes was made by Heidi Perry, seconded by Alyson West, and they were approved unanimously. B. Second review of bicycle safety logo ideas (Melissa Blackburn, Graphic Designer/ Assistant Webmaster, Community Relations Department). The Subcommittee reviewed the revised logo designs that were provided in the agenda packet. • Todd Jones stated that the first ones were less iconic than the rest. He then questioned the logos with waving hands because the rider's and driver's hands were not on the handle bars or the steering wheel. • Alyson West liked Options 1 and 2 that didn't show the rear /back of the cars. Todd Jones agreed. • Heidi Perry liked Option 7 but thought it should switch out the sex of the drivers and bicyclists. The female should be on the bike and the male should be driving. And they should not be waving. She request Melissa Blackburn to do several iteration of Option 7. 21 • Todd Jones said that he liked Options 1, 2, 3 and 7. The rest seem to separate cars and bikes so he didn't like them as much. The logo should try to promote harmony between cars and bikes. • Alyson West suggested perhaps continuing a green stripe behind /under the bike and car on the bumper sticker (horizontal) version of Option 7. Alyson also suggested adding `Orange County' under Option 7. There was not full agreement on adding `Orange County' on the logo, but they said it could work on some applications. • Heidi Perry wondered if we could put bikes and cars on the Orange County logo. Todd McGee and Melissa Blackburn said no, that the logo could not be altered. • The Subcommittee reviewed Option 3 as a bumper sticker. • Art Menius suggested making the bike black in all the options. • Melissa Blackburn stated that she would do a color black version and a color white version of Option 7. • The Subcommittee reviewed the Watch For Me website logo that is similar to several designed by Melissa Blackburn. It has two bikes and a car traveling side by side. • The Subcommittee agreed that they did not like ampersands in the logo options. • The consensus of the group was that they liked Option 7 the best. Melissa Blackburn reviewed with the group that she would bring back several iterations of Option 7 by October 13: o A female biker and a male in the car • Continuation of bars behind /under the bike and car • `Orange County' in orange along the bottom of the logo • Option 7 with the graphic from Option 2. C. Discussion of market testing final logo options (Todd Jones). Todd Jones stated that the Subcommittee needs to identify its target market. Our brand isn't known. The group reviewed the article included in the agenda packet 22 regarding logo testing. What do we want out of our logo? Which logo conveys that? For example: harmony between bikes and cars. What are we going to do with feedback? How do we go about market testing the chosen logo? Todd McGee felt that the group was spending too much time with choosing a logo; that we were making things too complicated for ourselves. Art Menius suggested using the former Bicycle Safety Task Force members to get feedback on the final logo options. Some direction would be need to be given about the message we are trying to convey, for example, that there is a need for motorists and cyclists to respect each other and coexist. We want safer roads with mutual respect and people following the law. We want harmony. What message conveys this objective? Abigaile Pittman stated that she would check the Goals adopted with the Bicycle Safety Task Force Report and bring back some suggestions for the logo objective. Todd Jones said that he could set up an online survey for the final logo options. The group decided that yes, they would: 1. Use the former BSTF members to get feedback on the final logo options. 2. Go on and expand the objective and logo with other posters, etc. D. Reports on homework assignments from September 11, 2017 meeting: 1. Search for additional bike safety art, especially with vector graphics (Heidi Perry). Heidi had previously emailed Abigaile several videos. Abigaile showed the videos on the screen in the room via the computer and projector. The group unanimously liked the video of well -known persons on bikes, and they thought that this type of video could engage people with the message. We could also use well -known persons on posters, etc. 23 2. Follow up with Cedar Ridge about video contest(s) (Peter Leousis). Peter said that the videography teacher at Cedar Ridge High School was very much in favor of the proposed video contest. There are four classes in one block. The group agreed that we would have to give the students parameters for the videos they would create. After discussing alternatives it was decided that a $500 gift certificate would be given to the teacher for the students to purchase needed equipment, and the winning video would be used in the bicycle safety campaign launch. Parameters would address safe passing, respect and friendliness, and use well -known people residing in Orange County. The length of the video would be around 15 seconds. The students would need some instruction about bike and motorists laws on the road. We could arrange for the Sheriff's Department to provide oversight on public roads. There would need to be some consideration to videos showing rural and /or urban riding. Cyclists can meet with the teachers prior to the students working on the videos. 3. Researching other graphic messages (Alyson West). Alyson said that she was not able to complete her homework assignment, but will work on it for the next meeting. 4. Update website concepts /contents (Art Menius). Art passed out an updated version of the website concepts /contents. This version added a dropdown menu for video resources. Todd Jones suggested that a maintenance plan be added and there was agreement. Art suggested that there could also be a link to a crash reporting tool and there was agreement. Alyson West stated that she could help with the crash reporting tool. The objective would be to encourage people to report accidents /crashes as part of the safety campaign. 5. Report regarding NCDOT road signs; and report from Sheriff Blackwood regarding NCDOT Bicycle Initiative ( Abigaile Pittman). Abigaile shared the M information from Chuck Edwards, NCDOT stating that road signage is possible, subject to MUTCD standards and the County paying all expenses. Abigaile shared that Sheriff Blackwood has agreed to work with the group on getting helmets that can be used in a bike rodeo. She said that she would request more detail from him about whether the helmets have already been applied for, and if they intended or participate in the bike rodeo. 6. Article regarding use of billboards to bring awareness about bicycle safety (Heidi Perry). Heidi had provided an article about a bicycle safety message being on a billboard. Abigaile included it in the packet for everyone to read. 7. How do we get more people involved prior to launch? Abigaile referred to an article included in the packet and suggested that everyone read it as a homework assignment. The group suggested asking Laurie Paolicelli to be included in a discussion of collaboration on the campaign promotion. E. Future grant possibilities (Art Menius) 1. Deeper search for potential funders (Art Menius) 2. AAA (Abigaile Pittman) 3. Blue Cross Blue Shield (Abigaile Pittman) Art Menius reviewed all of the grant potential funders to date. He also included a list of state and federal grants for bike /pedestrian projects. Abigaile Pittman stated that these grants had already been researched by staff and handed out a summary table prepared by staff. She said that staff would review Art's list to see if there were any that staff has not already reviewed. This could be discussed at a future meeting and could take quite a while to digest and review. Most of the grants involved were competitive, project ranking criteria, a local match, and local administration. E. Discussion of budget process (Everyone) 1. Knowns and unknowns 2. "B" Budget using $15,000 25 3. "A" Budget including aspirational funding 4. Regional and /or statewide support for future State Farm grants F. Homework assignments for next meeting. 1. Abigaile Pittman a. Check with the Goals adopted in the BSTF Report and bring back some suggestions for the logo objective. b. Provide greater detail on NCDOT's MUTCD requirements. She will bring examples of the MUTCD signs to the next meeting. c. Request more detail from Sheriff Blackwood about whether the bike helmets have already been applied for, and if they intended or participate in the bike rodeo. How much advance notice will be required? d. Read article in the Oct. 4 agenda packet: "Marketing & Education Initiatives for Encouraging Alternative Transportation Use in Decatur" e. Email suggestions to Abigaile of well -known Orange County people for videos. Make sure to tell Abigaile who they are. 2. Heidi Perry a. Contact the Commissioners about being in the videos. b. Read article in the Oct. 4 agenda packet: "Marketing & Education Initiatives for Encouraging Alternative Transportation Use in Decatur" c. Email suggestions to Abigaile of well -known Orange County people for videos. Make sure to tell Abigaile who they are. 3. Alyson West a. Research other graphic messages. b. Read article in the Oct. 4 agenda packet: "Marketing & Education Initiatives for Encouraging Alternative Transportation Use in Decatur" c. Email suggestions to Abigaile of well -known Orange County people for videos. Make sure to tell Abigaile who they are. d. P 4. Art Menius a. Will flesh out the plan for website maintenance. b. Read article in the Oct. 4 agenda packet: "Marketing & Education Initiatives for Encouraging Alternative Transportation Use in Decatur" c. Email suggestions to Abigaile of well -known Orange County people for videos. Make sure to tell Abigaile who they are. 5. Peter Leousis a. Contact video teacher (Andrea) at Cedar Grove High School. b. Read article in the Oct. 4 agenda packet: "Marketing & Education Initiatives for Encouraging Alternative Transportation Use in Decatur" c. Email suggestions to Abigaile of well -known Orange County people for videos. Make sure to tell Abigaile who they are. H. Establish next meeting date. The group unanimously agreed that they could meet on October 23, 2017 at 8:30 a.m. — 10:30 a.m. Abigaile Pittman suggested that they consider the sequencing of activities at this next meeting. The group agreed. 27 P Item 6.a. OUTBOARD BICYCLE SAFETY IMPLEMENTATION SUBCOMMITTEE DRAFT MEETING NOTES OCTOBER 23, 2017 8:30 A.M. — 10:30 A.M. ROOM 204, PLANNING DEPARTMENT WEST CAMPUS OFFICE BUILDING 131 WEST MARGARET LANE, HILLSBORUGH, NC 27278 SUBCOMMITTEE MEMBERS ATTENDING: Heidi Perry, Art Menius, Alyson West OTHER CITIZENS ATTENDING: Peter Leousis (member of the former BSTF) PLANNING STAFF ATTENDING: Abigaile Pittman, Transportation /Land Use Planner COMMUNITY RELATIONS STAFF ATTENDING: Laurie Paolicelli, Executive Director, Visitors Bureau A. Administrative Issues 1. Review and approval of Meeting Notes from October 4, 2017. Chair Art Menius asked if anyone had any comments or revisions on the September 11th meeting notes. There were none. A motion to approve the meeting notes was made by Heidi Perry, seconded by Alyson West, and they were approved unanimously. B. Third review of bicycle safety logo ideas (Laurie Paolicelli, Executive Director, Visitors Bureau). The Subcommittee discussed the third set of logos provided in the agenda packet and asked Laurie Paolicelli several questions with the follows responses provided: • Darker colors hold better as they are reduced; • She felt that the horizontal logos vs the blockier /more vertical ones present better; • She liked the logo with the bike next to the car on page 11 of the agenda packet because it conveys a forward motion; • She felt that the logos with two colors jumped out well and did not think the ones with three colors looked as well; • She didn't think it would look good to try to incorporated `Orange County' in orange into one of the horizontal logos (the Subcommittee discussed and decided that `Orange County' should be included in the road signs only); • She did not like logo option 13; W • She felt so -so about the logos with the extended bar (Heidi and Abigaile felt that they made the car look very long); The Subcommittee recommended the following logos for market testing: 1. Option 10 with the woman on the bicycle and man driving was thought to be a good version of the logo for road signs. They would like to have the `Orange County' at the bottom centered (it is a bit off), and then please do a second version where they are waving. 2. For bumper stickers, they liked both of the two Options for 9 and the four Options for 11. They would like to see a second `waving' set for the two Options for 9. 3. The Subcommittee ruled out non - horizontal /boxier Options for 9, and all of the Options for 12 and 13. C. Discussion of market testing final options listed in Section B above: 1. The Subcommittee finalized the objective language for the logo survey: In mid -2016, the Orange County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) formed a Bicycle Safety Task Force, charged to provide recommendations to improve road safety for cyclists and motorists in the unincorporated areas of Orange County. The task force consisted of cyclists, community advocates, public safety and transportation officials, school leaders, and county staff. The campaign, "Drive Safely, Ride Safely" intentionally shifts from hostile motorist/cyclist conflict toward the premise that most motorists and cyclists share an interest in road safety. This public education campaign is designed to foster mutual respect and road safety. 2. The Subcommittee decided to survey: a. The former Bicycle Safety Task Force members; and b. Laurie Paolicelli, Renee Price, and Seth Lageunesse 3. Request that Todd Jones set up an online survey for these logo options. D. Discuss of collaboration on promotion. (Laurie Paolicelli) 30 The Subcommittee and Laurie Paolicelli reviewed the media venues list that the Visitors Bureau has contracts with (provided in agenda packet). The following points were discussed: • Doing video spots proactively placed on social media for around $200 each; • Doing 10 -15 PSAs; • Orange County's Facebook account; • Orange County's Twitter account; • Orange County's Instagram account; • Orange County's You Tube account; • Best media venues for the campaign to reach motorists and bicyclists including youth would include online versions of newspapers: News of Orange; OC Voice, and Daily Tar Heel; also, the local TV might do a PSA as a public service gift; • Car dealerships such as Gerald Ramone Performance might promote the campaign, and Jill McCullah is his marketing director; • Bicyclists would be best reached through local bike clubs like Chapel Hill Cycling and Tar Wheels; • For print materials: Chapel Hill Magazine (possibly a letter to the editor); News of Orange; the Mebane Enterprise; Daily Tar Heel (for `op eds') will reach residents in southern Orange County; and the Endurance Magazine; • Tabling an event such as the Orange County Agricultural Summit in February at the Whitted Building; • Brochures would be useful at: the Whitted Building; the Chapel Hill and Hillsborough Visitor Bureaus; the two Senior Centers; and at the Schley Grange. • A changing banner on a selected website. Laurie noted that paid banners are around $2,000; • To reach students through other social media, Laurie told the group that Joel Keith has a group of UNC Campus Communicators that help get out key messages in Orange County. This group regularly gathers at the Blue Zone for coffee and they may be willing to assist with the bicycle safety message; • A "Next Door" ad; • Reach out to First Responders (a Fire Council meeting); 31 • Messaging (signs) provided for high school students on County campuses; and on the daily news show `WOLF', and in the school newspapers (if they still have them); and • Reach out with message to County church groups using list kept by Visitor's Bureau. E. Discussion of contacting well -known persons for video; developing instruction and objective language for high school video students; and potential calendar for coordinating with school schedule. Names suggested were: • Charles Blackwood, Sheriff; • Eric Montrose (Announcer, used to be a basketball player); • John Reese, Head of Bike Alliance of Chapel Hill; • Seth Stevens, Public Information officer for Orange County Schools; • Melissa Crane, Chapel Hill Magazine; • Mark Shultz, Chapel Hill News, or Durham Sun (commonly owned); • Chelane Flannigan, marathoner /runner; • Burgan Oderson, transportation planner for Chapel Hill; • Laurie Paolicelli, Executive Director, Visitors Bureau; • The Burmese community; • Well known chefs such as Bill Smith and Gabe Barker; • County high school athletes and their coach (but no UNC athletes); • Athletes' rivals; • Hillsborough Mayor Tom Stevens; • Eli Belz from the Hillsborough Bike Shop. Peter Leousis stated that he met last Friday the 20th with the video class teacher at Cedar Ridge, Andrea DeGette, and one of her best students, Dario Muller. Her suggested timeline for the video contest project is: • Planning and scripting in the Fall; • Story boards and rough shooting in January; and 32 • Actual shooting in March and April. The group felt that they would like to identify a road with a bridge that will be worked on in the Spring and coordinate with the Sheriff and NCDOT to use it for the videos. The group stated that they would also need to have Subcommittee members present for different stages of the process, especially for the rough shooting; and that it would also be necessary to enlist cyclist volunteers and motorist volunteers for the rough shooting. The group agreed that they would need to send the video class the objective language and semi -final logos, and to summarize some scary encounters such as close passing. The Subcommittee agreed that the would award the video class with $500 to be used for needed equipment as decided by Andrea; that the winning video would be used for the campaign launch; that the other videos would be used on the website. Heidi Perry to the Board of County Commissioners was reviewed and approved subject to a few corrections. Heidi stated that she would make these revisions and send it out. Heidi said that she would draft another letter to the other `video candidates', introducing the bicycle safety campaign and why we think they are a good candidate. F. Discussion of sequencing campaign first year implementation launch activities, and then using this prioritization schedule to inform the budget. - This item was deferred to the next meetina due to a lack of time to review and discuss. G. How do we get more people involved prior to launch? Our homework assignments included reading the article included in the Oct. 4 agenda packet: "Marketing & Education Initiatives for Encouraging Alternative Transportation Use in Decatur" Abigaile Pittman summarized the main eight targets for marketing programs: 1. Know your audience; 2. Target individuals; 33 3. Establish partnerships; 4. Promote the benefits; 5. Build a toolbox; 6. Follow the money; 7. Incorporate feedback; and 8. Connect to the regional system. H. Reports on homework assignments from October 4, 2017 meeting: - Discussion of remaining homework assignments were deferred to the next meeting due to a lack of time to review and discuss. 1. Abigaile Pittman a. Check with the Goals adopted in the BSTF Report and bring back some suggestions for the logo objective. b. Provide greater detail on NCDOT's MUTCD requirements. She will bring examples of the MUTCD signs to the next meeting. c. Request more detail from Sheriff Blackwood about whether the bike helmets have already been applied for, and if they intended or participate in the bike rodeo. How much advance notice will be required? d. Read article in the Oct. 4 agenda packet: "Marketing & Education Initiatives for Encouraging Alternative Transportation Use in Decatur" e. Email suggestions to Abigaile of well -known Orange County people for videos. Make sure to tell Abigaile who they are. 2. Heidi Perry a. Contact the Commissioners about being in the videos. — Discussed in Item E. b. Read article in the Oct. 4 agenda packet: "Marketing & Education Initiatives for Encouraging Alternative Transportation Use in Decatur" — Summarized in Item G. c. Email suggestions to Abigaile of well -known Orange County people for videos. Make sure to tell Abigaile who they are. — Discussed in Item E. 34 3. Alyson West a. Research other graphic messages. b. Read article in the Oct. 4 agenda packet: "Marketing & Education Initiatives for Encouraging Alternative Transportation Use in Decatur" c. Email suggestions to Abigaile of well -known Orange County people for videos. Make sure to tell Abigaile who they are. 4. Art Menius a. Will flesh out the plan for website maintenance. b. Read article in the Oct. 4 agenda packet: "Marketing & Education Initiatives for Encouraging Alternative Transportation Use in Decatur" c. Email suggestions to Abigaile of well -known Orange County people for videos. Make sure to tell Abigaile who they are. 5. Peter Leousis a. Contact video teacher (Andrea) at Cedar Grove High School. b. Read article in the Oct. 4 agenda packet: "Marketing & Education Initiatives for Encouraging Alternative Transportation Use in Decatur" c. Email suggestions to Abigaile of well -known Orange County people for videos. Make sure to tell Abigaile who they are. I. Homework assignments for next meeting. — At the next meeting the Subcommittee will return to existing homework list that was not fully addresses at this meeting. J. Establish next meeting date. The next Subcommittee meeting will be Monday, November 13, 2017 8:30 a.m. I •i1OZ1i15 i, 35 36 ORANGE COUNTY ORANGE UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION BOARD ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: November 15, 2017 Action Agenda Item No. 6.b. SUBJECT: Durham - Chapel Hill - Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Preferred Option — Public Comment Period DEPARTMENT: Planning and Inspections ATTACHMENT(S): 1. PowerPoint Presentation 2. Items of Interest in 2045 MTP Preferred Option 3. Draft 2045 MTP Preferred Option PURPOSE: INFORMATION CONTACT: (919) Nishith Trivedi, Transportation Planner, 919- 245 -2582 Receive a presentation on the 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) Preferred Option from Orange County Transportation Planning staff and offer any comments. BACKGROUND: The Durham - Chapel Hill - Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization (DCHC MPO) is responsible for long range transportation planning for Durham County and parts of Orange and Chatham Counties and is updating its MTP. The 2045 MTP is a federally required, financially constrained plan that recommends major transportation projects, policies and strategies designed to maintain existing transportation systems and address the region's future travel needs. Projects must be in the 2045 MTP to receive any state and federal transportation funding through the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). Staff is providing this presentation (Attachment 1) now primarily as information but also to allow an opportunity for Board comments. Any comments received will be communicated to the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) and the MPO Board for its consideration. Commissioner Jacobs is Orange County's representative on the MPO Board with Commissioner Rich as his alternate. On October 3, 2017, the BOCC endorsed the Orange Unified Transportation Board (OUTBoard) comments on the Alternatives Analysis and submitted them to the DCHC MPO Board. The MPO included these comments along with others and drafted the Preferred Option. The MPO Technical Committee released the 2045 MTP Preferred Option for a 42 -day public comment period on October 25th 2017. The MPO Board also conducted a public hearing on the preferred option on November 8th 2017. The preferred option is a 35 page document and can be viewed here- htlp-://www.dchcmr)o.orQ/r)roQrams/trgno rt/2045mtr).asr) tabs8 37 Orange County Transportation Planning Staff has reviewed the Preferred Option and provides Attachment 2 as a summary of key Orange County information. A copy of the 2045 MTP Preferred Option as released for public comment is also provided (Attachment 3). Next Steps • December 13 — DCHC MPO Board will approve Preferred Option and release full 2045 MTP report & final Goals /Objectives /targeted Performance Measures for public comment. • January 10 — DCHC MPO Board will adopt by resolution the 2045 MTP and report. FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no immediate financial impact associated with this item. RECOMMENDATION(S): Staff recommends that the OUT Board: 1. Receive the presentation (Attachment 1); 2. Discuss as appropriate; and 3. Identify any comments the Board may have for staff to convey to BOCC and DCHC MPO c a� c� t 0 L 0I Lil ***t 0 N i 0 L 0 rML L F� 0 rML O L L 4) L am O rq Lr1 ■ 1 PMA i� u 0 N U O O a o a, x Lr) U p Q N O O a a H Ln N O a a x ■ 0 V N N U V) N 4--) O C x Q 0 a Q" u V) U N � O � o � a 0 0 V N N U V) N 4--) O C x Q 0 a Q" u In u 0 s. x°A U fC OG >.1 ro O � O O mro i .N i 0 m u, O ro c� . i i O L- 4-j ro 'E (.0 O — — �O _ m -0 Q a O ro a 4-� m� i � � V — .- E V E °a. � ro x 0 s " V �D A �o 0�a Akin,, 4j D O V E s ro s V ro D O V ru O 0 L- 0- 0 4— O Ln 0 ro ro ro a-•+ 01 Ln O 20 I ru O Ln ro E � ro N Q) -0 U- 4- Ln U 4j O ra _o � 4 O Ln 4j o O v E a� D O C� E O Q) V E �E o 04- mLn v '� .- oEF 0- O Em u O 3 a� w en c�0 pool a 0 0 pool cv O y O N N Q O El co L a" c E c o c a o ra o E > IL. n E '- > _ aj M O ro LA ,n V~f �ELO- H a LA Ln 4-+ N L LL L a4-+ u (Q J co L y y G� V O a a H Ln 0 pool 0 N y II ►oo Q L Q Q L R T- C) N U N 0 LL r ti ti 0 O N N U U N U Q O a �. o CL C/) O L Q L. > a c� L Q a� U) N �P m Q U N �U N 0 T U N O E O CDL cu O cu Q O CDL c� 0 U .E O O U N O_ �U O co N cn N U N O m cn • u 0 v v v 0 v 0 0 ZK u 0 pool V1 � V1 �a � �a x �" u M Ui Ln E N Ln Ln ru 0 Q Ln ru L N •Ol N N u ru W V Ln 0 Ln Ln O u N a--+ N _N u_ N M 0) U) M 0- M 0) U) u L m Ln Ln+J O Ln Q C: c O v N - i +-+ ra O >\ ru Q L — O u 0l E Q> N j E Ln E � u rB O �_ D p O > Ln =) ru O ru C: E o N u u E ■ P" Ln p }, C: O +, 4- N > N Ol V � p .1 ; � ru .-. �, r ru ' � = u N � }; }, ro � � � ro N O Ln N 0 a- J N _ ru Ln O E Ln N N ru Ln _0 O ru O M O i O O E O � O +., c CM Ln ro O 01 � rB 0 �■�■■� N 7n O v >� V ro O rB u — N N E N u rB u vii Q E o w u u a� u — :tj r� o _ v�� N Ou N O V-0 N Ln a: O E u B — Q> i W W ih Q m Q m Q m V Q m a cz Ln o2S ro — N ro u C: ro O O N V O -C V Ln o O w >, cm ro O = ru o a -0 V ru _ u �- o 0'1 U N E ru E r +' E O r� N V 0 Ln - - Q Lr) u M Ui Ln E N Ln Ln ru 0 Q Ln ru L N •Ol N N u ru W V Ln 0 Ln Ln O u N a--+ N _N u_ N M 0) U) M 0- M 0) U) u V 9� �J L7� I� Ln 4-J a Ln Ln ro ro cz Ln ro Ol O O O O C:L C: O Ln _ N-0 O u O 0 G a� D u D Ln r� a o O C E 0 � V Ln a a 4-J Ln a a ro cz Ln T ru u Ln a a > ro ro .■ T Ln a V ro ro 4-J Ln a a Q cz a u u O O O 0 O C: u O V Ol i O0 a � O — V O ro O a Q E Ln Oru a--+ E -o ru Ol N Ln a _0 O ru E J Ln O D O Ln a V a Ln O Ln E a O Ol D a 0l Ln a O E ru 4- i a u a O CL a O CL Q m V 0 ro u E O O u w a� ru D E Ln ira m u a Ln Ln w V_ V O In i O E V CL a) O � O a--+ i _0 O Ln a--+ tf D c: E a Q u Q V 0') Ln i Z, Ln >. O > i ro O1 0 O r O O a ro i a E ro V � +-+ Q w i Ln � � Q O ro C V — u = Q Ln +�-+ +-+ -E N ro Q Q r > O V c Ln m O Q Ln C�L Ln — ro = E O E rB E — c W ro C W — D Q m Q m a� D Ln U-1 o ro 0 E Ln .- o w • > r 0 — > O ro O a Q E Ln Oru a--+ E -o ru Ol N Ln a _0 O ru E J Ln O D O Ln a V a Ln O Ln E a O Ol D a 0l Ln a O E ru 4- i a u a O CL a O CL Q m V 0 ro u E O O u w a� ru D E Ln ira m u O W AVA' . O L a a E W O .-p m i..i O a 1 C: .-. � O I N Ln .- Q O 0 ate--+ N 0-0 Q ru 3: H }' O ON .� U1 cm .� Ln Y O U Q1 0 L 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O Lfl O lfl N N ci I Ln ro � N ate-J 0 v n O u O a ~ E N O LL N M }' Q L 0'i I Lf1 Ln O 0 O Ln O •� E O N 41 N N Q O .O rq O� rml LLJ E O O ON 0 W cm Q I co O 'IT ci O Ln O N Ln O N O O N Ln M O N O M O N L Ln N O N O N O N Ln ci O N Ln O 3(D a .O L' Cl- ice+ Q1 0 ' I� W df" co IY Ch Ir co O 'IT ci O Ln O N Ln O N O O N Ln M O N O M O N L Ln N O N O N O N Ln ci O N 0 ■ pool ■ pool ■ pool r r--w y O 4- O D O U1 ro O 2 O Q ro 2 V 4- O O D V (1) ro O Ln (1) ro Ol D O Ln 2 a� a� (1) m ro Ol D O Ln 2 a� a� (1) m O O ro V 2 a� CL ro V a u 0 ■ pool ■ pool ■ pool r G� O W O 00 00 O ro r N Q 01) ro Ol C: N 0= p m E r0 � 01 O O -0 V � r0 `^ m O a--+ ru w D 0 O Ln O i Z Ln Z Ol Q s an c c0 pool a 0 0 pool i� c� v O O O ro V Ln N � O ; E O O -0 3: ro 4-d N N 4-d Ln > O ,.t E O E a, O V V O 4, O 4, V ro cn . N ro N L Lr) C: Ln 4 =) O O E ro E s O V can In ru 0 .cm E _O 0- E a� ra 0 ru D 0 n .Ln N a E O ru O 0 Ln I 4j D E E O V Ln ra Ln r� D E E O V s Ln Ln D O V Ln cn s I s 2 a-j Ln N D ru s Ln Ln p" as ru ru 0 a Ln CO Fee' ros", em s D 0 r� .x E ra Ln (n ._ D O s � o 4j s Ln 4j � � N .O Ul Ln C N 4-j �O O �1 a -j r6 O E E _ E C 4j Ln O .Ln j+ ra a� Ln 4 4j 0 .E Ln LO w O 3 0 pool Ln Ln 4-j 4-j Ln V u 4-j (1) (1) u 0. •O •11, , " " 0 0 N H N 00 U-) U-) U') N ry) -,t 0 0 0 N N N 0 0 0 ii rm it 11 W, 0) CD C, q C: 0 11 P, D 0 cl G) z x LIJ lam. z ■ To 411 t� r v,l7 m 6p I. UG y V G� O a0 pool y s i 0 p % N JAM„ l X�� rY 6'rM rf '✓ '� gt f+ LLJ p/ E frrYyy: W / Y, � V s 9J rr,, m xi a r �I tl houp�lll 19 it 11 '�fxrer I r =tt FI �r rdln, I I , su ivy 2��0?Ul9 l(prPN/ %/r�7/l0lllaP /G/(p/ r MIAMI, %a Fr L I W S a F U. 3 A� t L/j Y � 4 cc 99 tl " 1� ,M I r I � s �x I ■ pool 401 FMA 0 pool ■ pool Vd w ■ O I-M-9 a 0 fl .......... m 0 .......... I 6 '" 4..... .... 0 0 0 . . . . . . . > co . ............. ................... .. (T3 ................ .. ..... ... ............... 0 4 .......... .......... II ....... N............ ................... k"Cil Ol ra ra It P, CY) 0 .... ..... ....... cy) 0 N 0 0 0 .2 ........... N M 4-j N ........... ........... ra M > 0 Ln Ln '- >1 M ... ...... 4f - UF-J 4-j N F-j ........... (1) U rC3 U u ........... N , " 7-- c M 4-j (1) c 0 V ra N 4-j c 4-j %-.00 >1 u Ln E ra 0 V E M E E ra E n 4-j 0 ul 0 E 0 o . ........ ..... U f3i . ............ . M . ..... u..... 0 E 0 ........ . . 0 ra o E E 0 ra m m ra U .......... E u u C) C) LO LO a 4� O O M Q Ln Q c > Z) M O 0 +� .. (L) oM Ln M c M T o O_ T a) c N c O L > c O x LU u L > Ln _0 >' _0 �I�V Ln u IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII :j 0 Z Ln v O _0 L Ln Ln 0 � UJ _0 0 LL l!1 V IIII�1��� LL IIIIIIIIIII LO LO a O M Ln > in 0 M .. oM Ln M �. T o O_ T a) c N c O L > c O N M u > Ln _0 >' _0 �I�V rB u IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII :j 0 Ln v L Ln UJ _0 _0 LL LL UJ LL LL 4� Q > u u LU J J IN IN VVVUUUUII LO LO a v M .. Ln M �. O_ T > c N c O L > c O N M > M Ln Ln Ln �I�V IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII LO LO c a PMA tv • pool V • pool i s E o oE� °- y °aaEp 0 wo xfi r r i; � d w Hy H s c a FMA tv • pool • pool V I� o c CL - E m 7D C F ° � -CD ° E Ix m uu N All go V i's of loollp" eq 9R g9l, ° o m m n .o �, u m n .. ° I- LO GD V a H Ln 0 N CD C� G c� LL re 0 O N N U U a) O U i O CL C/) O �c: L Q L i Ln L Q a L Ta i a L 4 m Q U a) .0 Lr- N 0 T vI (u U N O E Q E N cu O cu Q O Q 0 U .E O O U N O_ �U O co N cn N U N O m cn • u 0 v v v 0 v 0 0 co O `r) N O N O u I s O M 4-j �■■� Ln L �■■, M V >1 ru E 4� ru 0 v ��� E V o E p Q Q 0, u c- ra >, c ra L/) , , I s W, V1 3 V1 c V1 0 pool y Attachment 2 Guide to Items of Orange County Interest in the DCHC MPO 2045 MTP Preferred Option • Orange County Base -line Data Used as Guide Totals: Guide Totals The numbers and headings in parentheses show the data used in the 2040 MTP Data Type 2013 2045 Growth % Increase Annual Change (2010) (2040) A. Connect people to jobs, education and other important destinations Rate Population 139,289 197,867 55,578 40% 1.3% III. Promote Multimodal 134,325 197,675 63,350 47% 1.1 Employment 64,212 107,791 43,579 68% 1.8% (70,491) (119,787) (49,296) (70 %) (1.8 %) Sources: State Office of Budget and Management for population and Woods and Poole Economics for employment. • Goals and Objectives Goals Objectives I. Protect Environment A. Reduce mobile source emissions, GHG, and energy consumption and Minimize Climate B. Reduce the negative impacts on the natural and cultural Change environment II. Connect People A. Connect people to jobs, education and other important destinations using all modes B. Ensure transportation needs are met for all populations (especially the aging and youth, economically disadvantaged, mobility impaired, and minorities) III. Promote Multimodal A. Enhance transit services, amenities and facilities and Affordable Travel B. Improve bicycle and pedestrian facilities Choices C. Increase utilization of affordable non -auto travel modes IV. Manage Congestion & A. Allow people and goods to move with minimal congestion and time System Reliability delay, and greater predictability. B. Promote Travel Demand Management (TDM, such as carpool, vanpool and park- and -ride) C. Enhance Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS, such as ramp metering, dynamic signal phasing and vehicle detection systems) V. Improve Infrastructure A. Increase proportion of highways and highway assets in 'Good' Condition condition B. Maintain transit vehicles, facilities and amenities in the best operating condition. C. Improve the condition of bicycle and pedestrian facilities and amenities D. Improve response time to infrastructure repairs VI. Ensure Equity and A. Ensure that transportation investments do not create a Participation disproportionate burden for any community B. Enhance public participation among all communities VII. Promote Safety and A. Increase safety of travelers and residents Health B. Promote public health through transportation choices VIII. A. Improve freight movement Stimulate Economic B. Link land use and transportation Vitality C. Target funding to the most cost - effective solutions D. Improve project delivery for all modes 61 • Scenarios The 2045 MTP uses Connect 2045 Triangle model called Community Visualization (CommViz), two land use scenarios were generated based on the above population and employment guide totals. • Community Plan —based on local comprehensive plans and land use policies. • AIM -High — This scenario uses the Community Plan scenarios as a base but increases the land use density and mix around the future light rail. It is based on draft data from an ongoing regional study on rail station development potential, and though it pushes the limits it is still market possible. 2045 MTP Preferred option uses the AIM -High because it is "within the market possibilities of rail station development and it proved to have desired, positive impacts on the performance measures such as reduced overall congestion and delay." • Maps showing Orange County Description of Maps Orange ounty Maps: New Household Density: Indicates following areas See pages 8 -11 increasing in household density: • Hillsborough and South of Chapel Hill • West Orange County north of 1- 85/1 -40 • Between Hillsborough and NC -54 • Between Hillsborough and Chapel Hill /Carrboro New Employment Distribution: Indicates following areas See pages 12 -15 increasing in employment: • East of Mebane along 1- 85/1 -40 • North of Hillsborough, along NC -57 • Along MLK Blvd in Chapel Hill 62 'Ibsosou utur I:Igiure 1: Orainge Coiunty 11 Hghway Projects 11mmorou'U'A"t do, pd , t/ d" 7 rr Ottapoll HOP pypp�� Klmr, r 'a . . .... ..... J 4 411, "Y"T pi Cl ■ 4"V"'Iq offiff 4" '4 C'Ajaz Aj'c 01V zo On ',v 64" f " Do "ol 6b; 11mmorou'U'A"t do, pd , t/ d" 7 rr Ottapoll HOP pypp�� Klmr, r 'a . . .... ..... J 4 New1upgraded Interchange Expressway Conversion IFreeway Conversion Modeinization ••••••• New Location Widening 63 ■ New1upgraded Interchange Expressway Conversion IFreeway Conversion Modeinization ••••••• New Location Widening 63 ar LL a� a� �, L LL L O LL LL LL m m N m N m N m N N N 3 O +' > > +- > +- > +- > 4, L +- +J +- +J +- +J � N N a a N a N a N a N N N bio -a O O y O O O O O O O O O O ++ +, O O O O O O O O O O M Vl O O O O O O O O O O E V N M O N 6 I� O O r, O to Ln O O N O Ln M N Ol N I- M Ln L 6 00 Rl Zt 00 ui N M c-I r- Lr M c-I I, Ln t � Op � to Ln --i 00 -:t to M Q 00 Ol J cI O O O O O O Z O N O C C C C C C N N 'E f6 f6 f6 f6 f6 f6 bio bio Q, > U U U U U U N -a C •— C — O L O O O O O O ~ 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 bio -a -aa z z z z z z CL _ c .a N N N N N N ' M N � 0 O O Q m O a i i i i i i i N N Op M X R W J L � V u > L L _a 1 m ci N p U N a O U E i6 � N a 7 O m C: 3 a s p a� s CL LL LL CO Lu 0000 N +� N > O > O C: > N z > _J co tw �- aO+ C -a (j 00 (C6 -a +� CO m E O s O C c 'a -a Y LL O 0.o to +, M C L N -j O Lu 0 N LL c O Ln LO > N O +1 X O L a m 2 X -a +' > O L LL _a "' -a to I O 3 s c U 0 O Z c °+1' O .� 3 c c c — - O � Ln N L w -L U 2 LOi Ln Li w � Z 0 U a Ln Lu Z w R: � a L � LL L LL L LL L � L L � L � � L � L L � L � L � LL L L LL a, LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL N> N N N N N N N N LL V (n N N N N N N N N N N N N N d N N N N N N N N > > > > > 00 00 00 00 00 00 > H +1 +1 +1 4� 4� 4� 4� 4� 4� 4� N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ++ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O p 00 N O O O l0 O O 0o O I� O O to O O O O O Lr 0) M O O M Ln w ri O O w O to I- O O O O O O O N 00 00 O N Ln I, M r-I O Zi- r, Ln O c I O l0 00 � O 00 W Ln 0) Ln cl 00 O F � l O O 00 N N ri to to c-I M c-I 6 Ln N Ol ri ri N N Rt to M M N Rt Rt 0) M t � Op � c-I N Q Q ri M 00 0) a N a a ri I- N N N Ln O M l0 Rt J N N Z Z N c-I I-� M Z O Z Z O O c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I c-I N +' C C C C C C N O O O O C O C C O E N +, m6 +, m6 +, m 4- m O 4, +, m O 4, O + , +, m w Q > •N N •L N •L N •L tw t U N •L U U N •C w w w w w w ~ L O O O _ _ _ _ _ _ N N f6 f6 O O C C J a O J J C C C C C C Q- 0 0 tw tw 0 0 a`o 3 W 0 3 3 0 a`o N N to to ' c-I ' ' N N N to Rt Rt Rt Rt to Rt O O Q O a N N ' ' ' ' N ' ' to N N N N N Op ++ y X R W J CL N CL N CL 4 '� C: 4' s U m s o O m s X00 •O C Ln 'a N ri 0A N N 1e Lf L (buil to to C d 'L C L N Ln C N Ln N C m ri DO Ln DO O N -0 r- _ -a Ln -a O H LL Z Z LL j co co Z co Z co s L 4 b In O -a > C s Ln N C tio ao � - ao � W tw C r1 m O u N —_ m m m o m m O U E Ln N > s s U ' s ao s s ' " 4� ri o co L L Z L Ln L C L L LfI C >� s� � Ln }, N O LfI LfI DO r-I LO Z Z O Z C C Co ? Z Rt LL Li Li Ln Ln s 00 ri ri 4 , Ln D D 6 CL N E - Ln d co co co m '� � " N N Ln L�r, co C fC: > a� C: 3 E Ln co s L r-I s L r-I s L s L E O O � O � O � Ln � Ln yi N L LfI LfI LfI LfI LfI LfI N Q s pp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �� 00 00 u -a yi c c V V V V V V U LL Ln LL Ln LL LL U ' ' ' ' J Z Z Z Z Z Z N N w R: P Ih.... 7: L L N N> N - - - LL. N v) v) v) v) v) v) a v) v) N N N N 00 N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 60 O O O O O O u m m� rn V) Ln c-I c-I r- Ol of 0) Ln N N r" to ui N Ol -i -4 N Ol M c-I I- M N Ln N t � Op � rn cI N O :1- 0) I- 0) J O I-� 00 M O O N 4 +' C O C C O O +, O +, W N Q m q0 q0 q0 ,N 00 m N •� > O U C C C E C U O i H JO C C C N C N CL N N N N Z Z 'a N to to to N Rt Rt Rt 0 O O CL O a Rt Rt Rt N N Op M X R W J o � +� O O O C O X O Co H O O 'a C m r- Ln ma d w O O O N c% N Ln V O J O O O w Ln Z Z � O N N c6 v1 -a Ln 00 ii vQi O cn ++ E w � s s O U L a C E E L O m 3 O g a� Ln o Ln Ln Ln 00 V O 3 v) 2 Lu O - - - Z Z a =) 7: RE I 7 & & 0 2 � d 2 0 C: / E 0 k � : S / Ln S •- / & � / � & / & _ \ & _ � 3 / \ 0 0 } / _ e E z § \ ƒ Z CL / ® ® � % E § 0 - M E = G o � ƒ z / / § � k e s§ c [ § s c ƒ o � e E g e u \\ 0 / k k \ 00 $ / '? / / 1 = w \ / / w -a ( \ £ / _ 0) E ° £ _§ - § u u \ I U 2 > o/ ƒ » u >- u U k e &= 3 / q § 2 tw E 2 § \ _ ƒ _ E § _ ' _ 0 E / / / 0 § \ / / u C 3 7� 0 / 0 o u \ _ / \ \ = / 0 / / g 0 \ 0 2 - = E } \ = e ƒ e W = & \ / $ 2 0 ) E g ■ 2 CL 2 § 'E{ §\ o+, u 2 E- a 0 CL ) u \ o § <• o CL f 0 S CL u ' .0 \ 4 k k / m\ E u L ' \ f \$ a E m \ f: u $ o 2 f m 0 U 2 e# E = 2 E #®' (-0 \ f / I bc z/ m / ZA m I U D $ $ � 0 \ [ $ L � \ 0 2 © o c \ \ ƒ e I # ƒ e e I o ~ 2 ± ( 12 � \ � ° f � $ ƒ - m v § 2 $ ƒ § \ ' § r u 2 � u ® � E u - 2 7o ? ± 5 / - 0 - e � ? ± » ° , 5 - _ o - f \ M E 0�- , u § E 0 ■- q t o e 2 2 ® E= ± I M � t t± ■ m = \ e o _■ m o = o = q _ = u _ m q _ 2/ 5 � ° C \ 0 c c ƒ 0 � = � ° ® 2= o x e o- o ® a E e § � 2 t E - G/ e § k= 0.-, E E- e g § k E § / ƒ { / = / $ { / $ J p ƒ E 4g E U ± £ E \ \ 2 [ E> § e e» z e t 7 E 7 w g > > > 2 0 0 ■ In • }ƒ > » _ 'e = 2 � o• LA u >§ R B e U u 2 R B § e e ■_ u 2 4> \ \ & � r u C / \ & ' § \ § § / .\ .E / ƒ �� W 0§ o U o» }% »® M e.-\_ m u \ e� o o(\ 7 7 E . E\ g g E 2 ■° g e E (- ° -_ 2 2§ )\ 2 2/ u/ 0�§ g o k§ u k\ / f o/ 2� 3\\ m 0/( 2� /// 3 0 m\ m 3\ RE Orange County Bicycle, Pedestrian and Multiuse Included in MTP Preferred Option IVIPO Policy The MPO bicycle and pedestrian policy basically expects any roadway or other transportation project, whether it is a new or improved facility, to include appropriate pedestrian and bicycle accommodations. That policy provides extensive integration of bicycle and pedestrian needs into the design and construction of new and improved highway and other transportation projects. In addition, the "NCDOT Complete Streets Planning and Design Guidelines" and other related guidelines provide planning and design guidance for use when building new projects or making changes to existing infrastructure. .: a ®R" figgiiau as I W11) � otalll Ifinvestiment by Made Total "111TP Costs Mod B,i kelPed/TDM 3 I:iggii r .�.II,) Cast by Made It is difficult to increase transit, bicycle, pedestrian and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) due to State Transportation Investment (STI) funding restrictions. 70 ATTACHMENT 3 2045 MTP — Draft Preferred Option Table of Contents Section Page 1. Goals and Objectives a. Background 3 b. 2045 MTP Support of the Goals 3 2. Land Use (Socioeconomic Data) a. Background 6 b. Guide Totals 6 c. Scenarios 7 d. Land Use Maps 8 3. Highways a. Background 16 b. Highway Map 17 c. Highway Project Table 18 4. Public Transportation a. Summary 22 b. Durham County Services 22 c. Orange County Services 23 d. Chatham County Services 25 e. Fixed - Guideway Maps 26 5. Bicycle and Pedestrian a. Local Plans 29 b. MPO Policy 29 (Continued, next page) iF °u 71 Financial Plan c. Background and Assumptions 31 d. Financial Plan Table 33 e. Graphs 35 Performance Measures a. (To be completed) W-1 72 Goals and Objectives Background The MPO Goals and Objectives are notable for three reasons: • Development process -- The Goals and Objectives were developed using an extensive public input process that included a public workshop, an MPO Board workshop, a public hearing and an online survey that received more than 800 responses. The following 2045 MTP Web page has detailed information on the development process: httJL12it.ly /DCHC- MTP -Goals • Alignment --The Goals and Objectives will be aligned with a set of performance measures and targets. For example, a performance measure such as "mobile energy consumption per capita" might be aligned with Objective 1A Reduce mobile source emissions. This alignment will make it easier to evaluate how the 2045 MTP meets the Goals and Objectives. • Regional coordination —The DCHC MPO and Capital Area MPO (Raleigh area) have had a joint 2045 MTP development process and final plan for almost a decade. However, the Goals and Objectives have been separate. In this long -range update, the two MPOs will have the same Goals and Objectives. 2045 MTP Support of the Goals The DCHC MPO strongly supports transit, non - motorized transportation modes such as bicycling and walking, and the transportation needs of low- income families, and endeavors to minimize transportation impacts on the environment. This support is clear in the language of the Goals and Objectives. At the same time, federal rules that guide the development of these long -range plans require that the MTP use reasonable assumptions in the financial plan. This requirement effectively means that the financial plan needs to abide by the current North Carolina Strategic Transportation Investment (STI) law. The STI and the project prioritization methodology that implements the STI do not permit the MPO to completely carry out its Goals and Objectives. The STI, for example: limits state funding for fixed - guideway capital expenses to ten percent of the total project capital; limits non - highway funding to eight percent of total STI funding; and, favors highway projects over transit and other non - highway modes in the prioritization methodology. In the Preferred Option, the MPO has endeavored to the greatest extent possible to make sure that the 2045 MTP transportation projects and budget reflect these Goals and Objectives despite the constraints imposed by the current STI. 73 2045 MTP Goals and Objectives Goals Objectives 1. A. Reduce mobile source emissions, GHG, and energy Protect Environment consumption B. Reduce the negative impacts on the natural and and Minimize Climate cultural environment Change 11. A. Connect people to jobs, education and other Connect People important destinations using all modes B. Ensure transportation needs are met for all populations (especially the aging and youth, economically disadvantaged, mobility impaired, and minorities) 111. A. Enhance transit services, amenities and facilities Promote Multimodal B. Improve bicycle and pedestrian facilities C. Increase utilization of affordable non -auto travel and Affordable Travel modes Choices IV. A. Allow people and goods to move with minimal Manage Congestion & congestion and time delay, and greater predictability. B. Promote Travel Demand Management (TDM, such as System Reliability carpool, vanpool and park- and -ride) C. Enhance Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS, such as ramp metering, dynamic signal phasing and vehicle detection systems) V. A. Increase proportion of highways and highway assets in Improve Infra- 'Good' condition B. Maintain transit vehicles, facilities and amenities in the structure Condition best operating condition. C. Improve the condition of bicycle and pedestrian facilities and amenities D. Improve response time to infrastructure repairs 74 Goals Objectives Vi. A. Ensure that transportation investments do not create Ensure Equity and a disproportionate burden for any community B. Enhance public participation among all communities Partici- pation Vi 1. A. Increase safety of travelers and residents Promote Safety and B. Promote public health through transportation choices Health Vill. A. Improve freight movement Stimulate Economic B. Link land use and transportation C. Target funding to the most cost - effective solutions Vitality D. Improve project delivery for all modes 75 Land Use (Socioeconomic Data) Background The MPO forecasts socioeconomic data (SE Data), such as dwelling units, population and employment, to the year 2045 and uses that data as a key input into the travel demand model called the Triangle Regional Model, or TRM). The process starts with the 2045 guide totals, which are county- level population and employment projections for the year 2045, and proceeds to the Community Visualization (CommViz) model that distributes the dwelling units and employment to particular parcels based on land availability and suitability. The following MPO Web page provides detailed information on the methodologies used for the guide totals and CommViz modeling process, as well as maps showing the projected population and employment distribution: : "i,ly` C C® T ®Land se Guide Totals The MPO establishes the 2045 county -level population and employment to calculate the growth that the CommViz model process will distribute. The population is based on estimates and projections from the N.C. Office of State Budget and Management, and the employment projection is based on a private service from Woods- and -Poole Economics. The employment current employment estimate is based on employer data from InfoUSA that is verified and updated by local planners. The following table provides the guide totals: % change 74% 66% 40% 59% % change 90% 78% 68% * 061y lirnciudes portion, of Chatham County lira the modelllirng area. 76% 76 Scenarios The 2045 MTP uses the Connect 2045 Triangle area land use modeling process, which is based on a model called Community Visualization (or CommViz). The Connect 2045 team created two land use scenarios with the direct assistance of local land use planners throughout the Triangle area. In these scenarios, the CommViz model distributes the county -level guide totals of population and employment growth to a particular place. • Community Plan —This scenario is based on the local comprehensive plans and land use policies, and can be understood as the most likely scenario. AIM -High —This scenario uses the Community Plan scenarios as a base but increases the land use density and mix around the future light rail. It is based on draft data from an ongoing regional study on rail station development potential, and though it pushes the limits it is still market possible. Preferred Option Uses AIM -High The MPO staff proposes using the AIM -High scenario for the Preferred Option. AIM -High is within the market possibilities of rail station development and it proved to have desired, positive impacts on the performance measures such as reduced overall congestion and delay. Maps The maps on the following pages show the distribution of the growth of households and employment from 2013 through 2045 in the Triangle Region and the three counties in the MPO. The set of household maps are presented first, followed by the employment maps. 77 Connect 2045 - Triangle Region Scenario Planning AIM High Scenario Regional Composite Map - New Household Distribution - 32 -Year Forecast (2013 -2045) Study Area Boundary (TRM V.6) L _ County Boundary Triangle J Council of Governments Geographic Information Systems 7.26.17 Interstate US Hwy 0 State Hwy 2.s s io Mile Households > 200 See table named "Connect 2045 - AIM High Output by Jurisdiction" for a summary of household and employment data allocat7eto individual cities, towns, and counties in the Triangle Region CommunityViz Model. Connect 2045 - Triangle Region Scenario Planning AIM High Scenario, Durham County -- -- —� —� —� -- -- — PERS �, — -- ------------- -� /mvvnaiu� �Y �fo r ' J r ' /........... .. rJ I �..... I it 56," �lli I � 101, � n »IIgJ n i VIP Perm �ini� I � p wW roi��/ jjj '�,�� t W� f fi i�i( i lll �I1Iffw�JC� III 4> GRAAVRI.:�Er III uW ~� r mi p ,« ifW1 Mal oio o �m0im�, q�9 uu� l��r IIII 11, (114 � m Ir G 0 /IIOVlll�lf F �I U. �/ // i : riiY ii Gi(lr %rr�1JJo rr , V � it Dlu Wl�ui /o �r All � Il" mi uu�ou um ul ill uN�� � �FW huuu» UU11Uy ga��ii ii ' I lip 2y �jjj' 2 °;.: m° i iul nr ;; ✓r ) iii if uG / / /��ia���rIIVuL% a( ,;♦� VIII,��p�,�g"I" �1rtrJ %� Wl! UP ar II 1 , � ri; IVII'� ",< (( " ✓ ' uu r � // :: l lfif / /i i�� � a � / /!/1%inn /,i✓ %r✓ it 5 ii I VII' � c -. �IIIIIIVIV�hVI IIWI� //1/�iiiJJJ�ir ���I/� I �����u'� I�JIi I IVlrl I ilui r iii "� of ® ® � 0u � ml � � 'WM ............. uuiiii �9 um um ul r. Ij uliN' im a J11 e 70 mu IVIV r. ►I i �A m lit € `uWai v 'V9)lj "",iw" bbl IIIIIVfJ�I J I�� 1j W 70 m "` IY RHA " IVf IP�rg" �W ml ,,._ p WAKE CH Al H AM E" , ff W, a 6i !s.. rir jMii r NW116W'a�', umuui,i$G' rluo �(r lr Regional Composite Map - New Household Distribution - 32 -Year Forecast (2013 -2045) Study Area Boundary (TRM V.6) Interstate L _ County Boundary US Hwy ------------------- State Hwy Triangle J Council of Governments Geographic Information Systems o me z.5 7.26.17 mil- 0 Households > 200 See table named "Connect 2045 - AIM High Output by Jurisdiction" 5 � for a summary of household and employment data alloca t�8to individual cities, towns, and counties in the Triangle Region CommunityViz Model. Connect 2045 - Triangle Region Scenario Planning AIM High Scenario, Orange County _ _ — _ — _ _ CASWELL I 4 _ _ — — — — L ZERS _— — � � — JIMWW//!' 4W1 I1f111YF� ,' / /MWF{'lfffMIXIN� / /fWWlllll'ORANCE -D -D 01 0 l f P .�_......... ... �5` 1 jsoi 1 � I llil� �� I,y ��ullN " „o »>>f a/ � U IOA 1 � �f((II G �IU�G�i IIIp y/ /�, � Ill /Jl� jj, jI �II! III.IIII i.. /� i�(�11 /�j�, 1111 ;IIII IIII f/� I w m II �� iiap NIIV�C 1�� IIC �Wrm WuIIJ" uW , d IIII o I IRO >�� III %NAMMII Ill ��1 � 1l Ir (� IIIII �IWI� ,I IIII IIII IIIGN���lf ll� �:. 501 UUj^II�''YY imrr, In uu Jlll _< �rw" IY Ivy IIIIlr��1Y. r} �y1111 I K( 1� \. q,pIgIIpIu !II!9 iWl� WI %// 111��111111 I ,......, YII� 98 �47 lNtr 1Y "� IIIIVmuu 1111 e j �f ' � „ Prr, V� , I f•�. ` �jjfI lu Ir»> or VI ���i✓ I 01111 otl"" fl �' mini i/c „, ..,� Iiiu ®1 � VI� o,x✓ .........., alb In'I�IE ' Ill�u vv /a �``►'rL...,�....�,. � � tl I /,,,.' dllr'/ to H zl .1, '1111, /1/ ?A5 IJ� J1 74"'11 '�(H l� 4 0 iito J IYRHAM . -- -- — �� +, WAKE R CHATHAM ALAMANCE �wI I4� °^ CH l HAM 831 Ilu ff1 �'�a,uiin 1'.: ) I ,� Regional Composite Map - New Household Distribution - 32 -Year Forecast (2013 -2045) Study Area Boundary (TRM V.6) rroimmNNNNNN Interstate L _ County Boundary US Hwy ------------------- State Hwy Triangle J Council of Governments Geographic Information Systems o me z.s 7.26.17 mil- 0 Households > 200 See table named "Connect 2045 - AIM High Output by Jurisdiction" s for a summary of household and employment data allocatg ®to individual 1 cities, towns, and counties in the Triangle Region CommunityViz Model. Connect 2045 - Triangle Region Scenario Planning ALAII CH40 HxA NAx X71 /� y4 �/ IIIIII IIklllll "� Il, P�1 ICI 11 u Yfiu , 64 y uuN Mrs , . iV >� uu muum i 1 .r �I`" um i ifRhmi r 0 mom nn m IIIIIIIIIII 1% 0 MN i �1 IIIIIIIIII �i a °i IIII mmiWil u ,: � uu J / AIM High Scenario, Chatham County "�,� m ®® 86' 'all M� IN LN Ire J CHATHAM i —f „ lWIN „ 4",, W �� YI R rl f r IIII�IiiiiYffffl���lti IIIIIIIII R4s kit. III � llll��5 umiiiwwm�¢ \ \ \ Regional Composite Map - New Household Distribution - 32 -Year Forecast (2013 -2045) Study Area Boundary (TRIM V.6) Interstate L County Boundary US Hwy _ 0 ------------------- State Hwy Triangle J Council of Governments Geographic Information Systems o i.zs z.s s 7.26.17 Miles Households > 200 See table named "Connect 2045 - AIM High Output by Jurisdiction" for a summary of household and employment data allocatg1to individual cities, towns, and counties in the Triangle Region CommunityViz Model. Connect 2045 - Triangle Region Scenario Planning AIM High Scenario, 5.1.17 Regional Composite Map - New Employment Distribution - 32 -Year Forecast (2013 -2045) County Boundaries Interstates/ Freeways US Highways 0 Employees > 1000 NC Highways See table named "Connect 2045 - AIM High Output by Jurisdiction" A Triangle J Council of Governments " 2.5 5 " for a summary of household and employment data allocat�.o individual Geographic Information Systems M1e cities, towns, and counties in the Triangle Region CommuniittyViz Model. Connect 2045 - Triangle Region Scenario Planning AIM High Scenario, Durham County -- -- —� —� —� -- -- — PERS �, — -- ------------- -� /mvvnaiu� �Y 010 r ' J r ' . I . r III ' 56 uu�� of °1 l 'f ,II r � I :j", - ;wain VIII I N,1 � III u ,rr t r `> � cRAwVit.I.:�Er jjj r IIII w \ 1 A IIII Ir I!1j)JWW11110 1111111, IIIWv ry1 1 � Wl IW 1 f y��N��llll Sol �1�� III I �iw yy�,, ))mm 111111 ra �9��'lllu r Ip �I@ ., 50 � ,, I i� ° � rr li uuuiuiNUl III, � I�'I it IIIIIIII r��11 K4 �� / VIII ,. MIIIII I IIII ^,. VIII il ' ...... f% ,.,.., f / Il 1 jj » Ila%, 5 0 II 1N��N ou'llll Ilk 11l' l" u147 J IIII Iglu �VIII�;P�I +� � wr milu�u 18 i n Sri IIII �IINI�,m u d �U16 � m�i, uuuu�4111Vr� u i r III I � tlt�� � ° 7rI �JPJ IIII tyr ......_ J 01� f ilfr I� a1� ;9Y!➢ ,r, ��' »irJ uuu iI� hmi��r IVIV01 Illt mii it .fir � „rmr uwumu �>tl j e , uuu VIII I, � J uuu .uuu � 7o �O � )9 im�i(� II umuurium " IIIIIuuuIV�' 111V n um�l 'V4 "�u ul Im �I � umllllll VIII I� f, raii(� jjj I� »- ulllfl�IG� ' � r I r � IIII frf y y uuu nu n� �illl uu VIII fly rAM � � flNU Vii, llU�l� Illlol�r� ars; / u�✓ia iV uuum G Va ., , luui �� (fi r z S ��IVl�ldll g 70 �° �IIIIPt VIII WAI CH Al H AM m ijig °iai uuu �4 fill VII ra „e Regional Composite Map - New Employment Distribution - 32 -Year Forecast (2013 -2045) � ���IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�f Study Area Boundary (TRIM V.6) Interstate L _ County Boundary US Hwy ------------------- State Hwy Triangle J Council of Governments Geographic Information Systems o i.z5 z.5 7.26.17 mil- 0 Employees > 1,000 See table named "Connect 2045 - AIM High Output by Jurisdiction" 5 for a summary of household and employment data allocatgSto individual 1 cities, towns, and counties in the Triangle Region CommunityViz Model. Connect 2045 - Triangle Region Scenario Planning AIM High Scenario, Orange County _ _ _ _ _ _ _ CASWELL I 4 _ _ — — — — L PERS _- � - - JIMWW//!' 4W1 11f111' kXH },' / /MWF{'lfffMIXIN� / /fWWlflll' " IffR'rk(W / / //�WN((�IIWWWfflfl' � _ � _ _ _ L _ _ _ - ORANGE Kt Q �_3 01 _3 ca f ,1 �5 1 J soi 1 iiiiiillllll 1 ;; • �^�,.4u 1111 W „u i lll�Ul@W111UI IIIIIA ��� w mu w w < C 501 :J � l; uiu`um a z m„ u, Q " Illluuu��lfiii'�� � `,. 1111 "Illlpu" IIII m n! 98 u� v f ivam f 111 li �9 11�Mq ��irt�. wu p 1111 Am �uuVNl umiui 1111 '� uuu t61r�I�iz �„ A` uuu °Pllu I� i� ,alp �, 5 111 rill „JH m" "'emu �" 11 r „III . - ......,. w Ur AK m °i�in uuu ,,., imi muuuumum 1111 wiii` mu., . ✓ �." 0 � pinll �AI ��ihu�AUm CHATHAM ° S ALAMANCE wFwwuuwwww + y 4 CH f\A HAI Regional Composite Map - New Employment Distribution - 32 -Year Forecast (2013 -2045) Study Area Boundary (TRM V.6) Interstate L _ County Boundary US Hwy ------------------- State Hwy Triangle J Council of Governments Geographic Information Systems o me z.s 7.26.17 mil- 0 Employees > 1,000 See table named "Connect 2045 - AIM High Output by Jurisdiction" s for a summary of household and employment data allocatg4to individual 1 cities, towns, and counties in the Triangle Region CommunityViz Model. ALAMANCE CH4 HxA NAx J Connect 2045 - Triangle Region Scenario Planning �N, 1N�1 f 64 � y; iV�ifv 111 y, If �9Pu 1` II�IIu� . / AIM High Scenario, Chatham County �I Illlllii'"'Wlldll� r II f TU 1 b II f j II I I �IIIII V�G r% ✓, ..w, IIII IIII 1111111 II �m � � `SIN ' �,, 111111 Illlllwu 4t f� 1 S 1� III CHATHAM r ��( �s� � IIII °1 "11111Yu r r r r / / iii Llll � / / / // IL / I / luuuul / r / �i Regional Composite Map - New Employment Distribution - 32 -Year Forecast (2013 -2045) � �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�f Study Area Boundary (TRM V.6) Interstate L _ County Boundary US Hwy ------------------- State Hwy Triangle J Council of Governments Geographic Information Systems o me z.s 7.26.17 mil- 0 Employees > 1,000 See table named "Connect 2045 - AIM High Output by Jurisdiction" s for a summary of household and employment data allocat8 fjto individual 1 cities, towns, and counties in the Triangle Region CommunityViz Model. Highways Background The highway and interchange projects to be included in the Preferred Option are shown in the maps and tables below. Projects were selected based on their ability to promote the MPO's draft Goals and Objectives and the expected availability of funding. The MTP designates and funds the highway projects by the decade in which the project will be completed for operation, i.e., current to 2025, 2026 to 2035 and 2036 to 2045. This designation helps demonstrate that the MTP is accountable to the federal fiscal constraint requirement. The North Carolina Strategic Transportation Investments (STI) funding tiers, i.e., St = statewide, Reg = regional or Div = division, are identified to abide by the current state funding process. For the most part, new and upgraded interchanges are assumed to be part of the highway projects that are listed and therefore are not commonly listed separately. However, the fiscal year 2018 -2027 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) has listed eight new or upgraded interchanges as separate projects from the highway project. The 2045 MTP highway map and table show these as separate projects, as well. Highway Map The highway map on the next page shows the proposed highway improvements for the 2045 MTP. An interactive online map is also available at the Preferred tab on the 2045 MTP Web page: www.bit.ly /DCHC -MTP The DCHC MPO adopted a multimodal Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) in May 2017, which contains a larger set of proposed projects because the CTP is not fiscally- constrained. See the interactive online map called Highways and Intersections at the following link to view the CTP highways that were considered for possible inclusion in the 2045 MTP: www. bit. IyJDCHCM PO- Adopted -CTP Highway Table The highway table breaks the projects into the three funding decades, i.e., 2025, 2035 and 2045, and then lists them alphabetically. E.Q. n C� G _M n c O M L O Q U) c M M O Q O L- N O N O Q O N L N N n a H C6 O C6 L O Q C6 L O Q O L Ln IZI- 0 N 4- N J a--+ U O f6 3 s ao no C O 4- Q O W N d bn w L v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL O c0 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 t0 a1 a1 t0 t0 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 t0 a1 t0 a1 t0 a1 a1 a1 a1 Ll N > ++ fb ++ fb ++ fb ++ fb ++ fb ++ fb > ++ fb ++ fb > > ++ fb ++ fb ++ fb ++ fb ++ fb ++ > fb ++ fb > ++ > fb ++ fb ++ fb ++ fb ++ fb ~ >_ >_ >_ >_ >_ >_ >_ > v v v >_ >_ >_ >_ >_ V V) V) V) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 'ZS O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 01 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N 1 O Ln p n� r-I N M O O O r-I O 00 n N N Ql I� O O 0l O r-I W m 00 O 00 ^� Ln p O In O In O In M In M Ql Il M N r-I O N Ql r-I I� M l0 O N 00 In l0 N M N N N I, N O N N l0 N M 00 0 n M 4 N M M r-I M n m M N W -o 00 r-q rr, L O l0 O0 O M l0 U N ri l0 al al Rz� U� O0 R l0 M l0 N a bap W O r-I M O r-I r-I r-I O r-I O O r-I N O O O O O O r-I O J 'E a a a z z z v v v C bA bA E c c c p c c c E p •-p c c c c c cmb cmb y O O O O O O i O O O O O== > �, O fb U fb U fb U 0p 0p 0p N fb U a) 0p fb U fb U +' a% 0p 0p 0p N fb U fb U fb U fb U> fb U N a1 O O O C •� C •� C •� O c •� O O •E •E •� O O O O ns O a, a) Q m E " " m " " " N N N" >a >a >a cpc N Q >� N N >a >a >a cpc N N N N N N N Z Z Z > > > G Z S > Z Z > > > G Z Z Z Z LL Z Z Z "a R* N n N N R* 00 M R* N N N N N l0 N y N O 0 � O J a bA N N NR* l0 R* N N N C w C W J CL V) i U 0 > L •� cif a) m L = . U m cn >�. O � X cn 7 = c0 E — O E ++ C a) CL O CO ++ Ln ++ ns > a1 O p O 3: N Y U In In t a fb E 00 N p> U O U^ t I? ao m�z zI° a I z m WV_ X L W L 00 U > > > > � Z $ cif bb..0 "✓7 a1 U +a+ O O J CD -a 0A 0A X v O C > Q Vr ( by E Q ^> m v ^ o W > LL V) v bA v bA v ns a t t E E Y O L r-I C �, r-I C C "a "a c0 i a1 a1 Q z _j m U °1 U v IO - (n Z J J m W O Z G O O (n LL c- 0 iF 0 •tn U "✓7 _ C rn U C v O rn v w � +�+ x fb = O U_ cb C U i v a X i r-I - X 7 Q fb * iF c c X > > O U >, a) > >_ as �u� > 3 Lm aEi o X ° v o o °> w x 3 a (D . c Q Q `b 3 U W Y c W cEb ns U z c I� > * O In In o U a) W o —� v In of v +� +� a v r I r I r_ Ln Ln Ln v O = o I� o o I, ' "w^ L fb fb 7 fb fb O L o � O-W r Q U U U U U N L W Vf >> Vf Vf S CO U W W LL LL LL LL - - J >, J E Z - m Z 2 Z Z Z Z 0 d V) S> S S . •GI C O I I C O a, L bA a) a) 72 a1 I I V) v ns 3 ns O V) a H C6 O C6 L O Q C6 L ^O O L Ln IZI- O N 4- N J a--+ U N 0 f6 3 s ao no C 0 4- Q O ^0^` ^W W N d bn w v LL v LL v LL v LL v LL v LL v LL v LL v LL v LL v LL v LL v LL v LL v LL v LL v LL v LL v LL v LL v LL v LL v LL v LL v LL v LL C O N cb N N cb N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N cb N N N N LL N ++ f6 > ++ f6 ++ > f6 ++ f6 ++ f6 ++ f6 ++ f6 ++ f6 ++ f6 ++ f6 ++ f6 ++ f6 ++ f6 ++ f6 ++ f6 ++ f6 ++ f6 ++ f6 ++ f6 ++ f6 ++ f6 ++ > f6 ++ f6 ++ f6 ++ f6 ++ f6 >_ >_ >_ > b.0 b.0 b.0 V) V) V) V) = 0 V) V) V) V) V) V) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 'ZS O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 01 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O Q O O O m 41 n Ln n Ln p 00 N O O K Ln lD O O O C O n n N IZ O O O N N N 00 p m M 0 0 lD M Ln r-I p O0 r-1 10 0 0 w 0 lD 0 00 O O O r-i O N <D l0 �* W W O O N 00 I, N n M R* r-I 10 Il Ln t <D r-I O <D V N Ln N r-I 10 Ln a Z:,:, n QO C O O N N r-I LU r I r I r-I M r-I r-I Ln N M r I N N M M N Rz� OO N al ri ri N ri ri M M I� OO al N N Ln bap N O r-I O O O N N N N -1 O O Il M Il O R* O O r-I r-I r-I J'E as a as z z z z z +1 C w c c c c c c c E O o . o . O O •} O O y CL o 0 0 0 o o o } > > fb N fb fb fb N N bA N N bA bA bA bA bA fb N fb fb N bA bA O u U U u 'C •C v v �_ C C C C C C C v U v v •C U u C C Q 0_0 J N O J O J O J i N i N 'tj fb 'tj fb i N i N C C C C C -0 fb O J -0 -0 i 00 J J i C C N O N N N O O w O O - Q Q O N N O 2 2 �: CL Q) 2 z z z z >> z>> z z O N O � O J a bA N N N N N R* R* w N <D N N C to i i i i i i i i i i i i to C W J fb Ln a U a a Q�i Q camc_ C m M I? O +� C +' r-I fb 'tj `' m c i Q O O O t O _ O U by :3 U ^ bA "a N Q) w Y C _ `1 Ln p L lD "✓7 fb lD C C i N Ln Ln C r-I 00 o 00 r-I •L -0 -0 r — O cb J> i U O cif bQ.o Q U> O0 U U O "a bQ.o (b (b U O W > LL Z — LL D O Z> Ln — Z Z (b LL �' J CO co Z Ln v Vf C i i > Q O1 O1 V) O1 O1 O1 V) w w "✓7 O w C +�•, C m 1•f lD OO O0 O O0 U O i � bA b.0 fb i fb i ri U Ln O i U fb t b.0 fb t fb t en Y m N ccQ N O C C R* R* L L Ln Z L X to 10 Ln N V C V V Ln C >� t C Ln G U 'L 'L Ln Ln N N n bA O > 00 r-I N i N N O O +cc+ f6 (b f6 (b U U }' }' U Q m U Vf +, ++ ++ O0 LL G U LL LL LL Z Z Z O V) 0 Z S L V) W LL LL � Z tj i C V) O C 7 r1 m N O O rI C C n E Ln tO O C N Ln Ln bA 7 I� i "a .73 0 X N `� `� N O U N c U W 0 V) Vf U Z �'' !? +� J E N cb J E Vf \ Gl X 0' 0' \ \ 'a 'a C (b O ga. W N O1 O a > a > a > a > O LL > a CD CD CD CD N v i (b -a 'a i c O Q -a cab cab Ln Lr�i 10 °° t � cb bA >. E E E E +� +� U Q 3 b�_A c c c z Z z V) m c (E6 t t t t N N> o Z z S O O •L E E !? Ln !? \ \ \ \ Y u Ln Ln Ln „ O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln Ln le (b U U U S V i W fb LL fb LL fb LL O LL O LL O LL O LL C� S S S S — Q0 J G Z Z Z LOAGI C O I I 0 f6 C Q N L bA N N }1 I I V) N O H C6 O C6 L O Q C6 L O Q O L Ln IZI- O N N J a--+ U O f6 3 s ao no C O 4- Q O N N N a bn w u v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL O v v v v v v v v co v v v v v v v v co v v v v v v v v v v v LL N ++ fO ++ fO ++ fO ++ fO ++ fO ++ fO ++ fO ++ fO > ++ fO ++ fO ++ fO ++ fO ++ fO ++ fO ++ fO ++ > fO ++ fO ++ fO ++ fO ++ fO ++ fO ++ fO ++ fO ++ fO ++ fO ++ fO ++ fO bA b.0 b.0 > >_ >_ >_ >_ >_ >_ > > >_ >_ >_ > >_ >_ >_ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 'C$ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 01 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O � Lr `� r-I N r-i O 00 O 00 N n N to O O 0 O 00 00 l0 N O l0 00 N � r-I l0 r-I r-I O m N m n R* r-I � tD m n 00 0 O 00 0 n IZ n l0 O O n n l0 n r-I l0 N M M r-I l0 00 a N N l0 l0 Ql N r-I N M Z: 00 r-I N n M M n C Lr O n Ln Ql N l0 -i M LU r-I M r-I n r-I r-I 00 Ln M r-I M r-I r I N r-i N t O M l0 I.f) N Rz� O Ln Ln O0 M O l0 Ln M ri al Rz� ri N O Rz� ri Rz� Ln a bp w rI r-I r-I O O r-I N N O N O r-I N O r-I O O M r� N l0 n 0 M O r-I O N C al E C C C C C C C O C C C O C C C C C C C C O E y E •�, O O O • •�O , O O •�, •�O , W Q (0 '++ •++ •++ (0 '++ •++ •++ '++ '++ •++ (0 '++ '++ (0 (0 > > 0A 0A 0A N fO fO 0A fO N fO fO fO fO 0A fO fO N 0A 0A 0A 0A 0A 0A fO fO N N p 'E U U U 'E > U U U U U U '� CL i O J O J O J i fO O J O J O J O J O J O J i O J J " " " " " " N N N N N N N N N N N cpc >� ccO >� ccO >a >a >a >a >a >a ccO ccO G Z Z > Z G LL Z Z Z Z > Z Z G > > > > > > Z Z G G l0 -tt N -tt N-tt l0 N N N N R* N N R* R* 00 O l0 l0 l0 N N N R* to � O N CL O a by N N R* N N Ln N N l0 l0 N Ln C Ln to C W J C O Z -0 E EO t O0 Q U :a c n tQ0 p� t3 c +�+ C r-I E t0 r-I a a c O u g2, a1 X a1 0 O — a1 J �. a1 a1 0 O N Ln Ln w -O Q) In v oo 3 > v a �n o O o �, Ln � o> a' x -0 Ln � Q� ?� Y O O i L en > > r-I n t •� r-I Ln O n en O p cb U cb U a1 t O cb O > O C cif cif O U tb cif U a� cif X a) Co Z Co Z Z cJ G __ (n Z CL J () W S S �' Z S Z_ �' S J W CO Z L � x W L > v V) (0 Co E V) r- m Vi v ++ N p O fO 0 O p i N OL E O O w O O In EO O C .ccam L n Ln ^ bA "a bA (O Ln r-I I� I� I� I� r'I Ln cJ fcc0 O U U C2 00 LL Il Co G W U S Z G Ln S W CL G O a S J Z Z D D of D D D _ +� v _ c v a' L c E ++ en i O i p C CL Q) > •� C C E O _ 41 > E O C C O "a Z U y 0A c a E > U O v U +� , = 7 fb i= C ++ Z x C r-q a *' CL c +� `� V) c +� Ln v W > p Y *' c cif > w cb w cb X W v +� 3 0 0 0 o o • a s o v E Ln 3 Ln = o v o v v v v c o o° c > Y L Ln Ln Ln Ln v > •C "M •� •� 3 L > __ Q_ {� C U U U U U a1 X p U O V) C C p C m a1 O O�� 00 00 00 N C ++ = z z z Z4 W = cn V) > > u a a U w c� 3 S S S_ _ � 3 z c O I I O L 0A v N 72 v I I }1 v 3 O V) C6 O L 0 Q C6 L O Q O L Ln IZI- O N 4- N J a--+ U N O L 3 s ao no C O 4- Q O N N d ao w v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v LL � LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL � O a1 t0 a1 a1 a1 t0 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 t0 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 t0 Ll N ++ > f0 ++ f0 ++ f0 ++ > f0 ++ f0 ++ f0 ++ f0 ++ f0 ++ f0 ++ > f0 ++ f0 ++ f0 ++ f0 ++ f0 ++ f0 ++ > f0 F- b.0 b.0 b.0 b-0 > > > b-0 > > > b.0 > V V) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 't$ O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O 00 Ol O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O r-I m 1 n 00 O a O r-I l0 M I� N M O d a O Ql Ln O m 00 I- O l0 M n O M n r-I N O l0 N N Ln N O Ln O l0 l0 M n Ln V N r-I Ql n M M M L.f) M Ln In Ln O 00 r-I i LU N N N r-I r-I N N a) 00 R* r-I O a) L n N m I, n al Il N O0 O R* w N Op W N ui -1 O N N -i N M 0 0 R* N l0 r4 C E � J 7 a1 t C O O O �0 E y O O O O O U W Q ns '++ •++ •++ ns '++ ns ns •++ a) U O C C C U U U 'N U 'N C n C C Q '� � '� 0 0 0 w 0 C j f6 "a "a_ "a_ "a_ "a_ "a "a_ a 0 0 0 a w Z Z Z > Z> >> Z .2u "a M N l0 l0 N c0 al N 0 C O al Q C v N 0 J t ++ a c O bb N N N N R* N N R* l0 R* N C N w C ns J W O U V) "a C CL 2 2 M U a L :3 U U m O ,� ,� •� CL O O "a f0 �n Q x O t CO U O U O Y Y Q Y Y C a1 -a _ w O— -0 d O Ln 00 m m c H O O 2 V) O a (7 V) O —- O a aj a] L C m L Q- > E O Q) -C j co CO ns O i m (0 O in N O i LL O Lr U W O E cn a1 I.!) i J I..f) t0 �n Vj I, +�+ z O Z m v C If) � t a o Q i f0 In r, — C Y C r-I ±± r-I Y J t U a1 Ln () - m E V} LL z O 2 — cn in cn 2 cn V) 2 Z } aj m O m O i 1 1 z O a a aj U E E O Z E x aj U f0 f0 C o On t (O W C al t t a1 7 in Q � 2 -a U w aj _ c° a C r-I � aj i C > p � {n v t O O 0 O Q O w rI rI rI aj v +� ° C OL i U? U? L If) LL cn ns 00 ++ ++ x ++ r-q r-q > r� 1 aj W U U U U O O f0 O t :0, > O > f0 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z a V) (n (n 2 2 u 2> > MR C O I I 0 C O a1 L 0A a) ai v II V) a) O V) Public Transportation Summary As a basis, the 2045 MTP adopts the transit services as approved in the county plans: • Durham County Transit Plan, originally approved in 2011 and updated April 28, 2017. The detailed plan is available at http: // ourtransitfuture .com /plans / durham/ • Orange County Transit Plan, originally approved in 2012 and updated April 28, 2017. The detailed plan is available at _http: // ourtransitfuture .com /plans /orange/ The plans include major projects such as Durham - Orange Light Rail Transit (D -O LRT) and Wake - Durham Commuter Rail (CRT), but do not include specific programmed bus facility or service projects beyond 2023. The bus services operating in the DCHC MPO in 2045 reflect the MPO's best predictions of transit services operating at that time. The 2045 MTP makes two notable transit investments that exceed the county transit plans: • The Wake- Durham Commuter Rail Transit (CRT) is extended from West Durham to Hillsborough in the 2045 timeframe; and, • The Durham - Orange Light Rail Transit (LRT) is extended from Chapel Hill to downtown Carrboro. Durham County Services The program of projects and services in the Durham County Transit Plan include the following: ■ Bus Services Already Implemented Additional Bus Service (including new routes, increases in frequency, etc.) • GoTriangle, 7,640 annual service hours • GoDurham, 24,350 annual service hours Planned Additional Bus Service • GoTriangle, 6,260 annual service hours • Durham County Access, 7,896 annual demand responsive trips The Durham County Transit Plan also supports the increased cost of existing GoDurham service — e.g., the increased cost of providing service that GoDurham provided before the transit plan was implemented. About 9,000 existing annual service hours are assisted with Durham County Transit Plan funds. An anticipated 15,000 — 27,500 additional bus service hours may be available following implementation of D -O LRT. These "rail dividend hours" reflect bus service currently 92 operating in the D -O LRT corridor that could be redirected to meet other Durham County transit priorities. ■ Bus Capital Projects The purchase of new vehicles (and subsequent replacement) to support the service funded by the Durham County Transit Plan. Bus facility improvements to facilitate transit access and improve the customer experience, including new park- and -ride lots, stop improvements and other capital investments along transit emphasis corridors, new transit centers, and stop improvements. ■ Durham - Orange Light Rail Transit (D -O LRT) — 2028 estimated completion date Light rail transit service between UNC Hospitals in Chapel Hill and North Carolina Central University (NCCU) in Durham, providing 50,000 hours of transit service. Project includes bicycle, pedestrian and bus infrastructure improvements along the alignment. ■ Wake- Durham Commuter Rail (CRT) — 2035 estimated completion date Commuter rail service linking Durham, RTP, Cary, Raleigh and Garner. The service will be funded in coordination with Wake County. ■ Wake- Durham Commuter Rail Extension (CRT) — 2045 estimated completion date Commuter rail service will be extended from West Durham to Hillsborough, with a station at NC 10 /US 70 area and S Churton St /US 70 Business. This extension is not in the Durham County Transit Plan. It will be financed in the last decade of the 2045 MTP by assuming that legislative restrictions that currently restrict funding that can be used for transit will be repealed. Orange County Services The program of projects and services in the Orange County Transit Plan include the following: ■ Bus Services Already Implemented Additional Bus Service (including new routes, increases in frequency, etc.) • Orange Public Transit, 4,500 annual service hours • GoTriangle, 6,708 annual service hours • Chapel Hill Transit, 6,427 annual service hours Planned Additional Bus Service • Orange Public Transit, 2,387 annual service hours • GoTriangle, 1,492 annual service hours • Chapel Hill Transit, 6,392 annual service hours 93 The Orange County Transit Plan also supports the increased cost of existing Orange Public Transit and Chapel Hill Transit services — e.g., the increased cost of providing Orange Public Transit and Chapel Hill Transit service that was provided before the transit plan was implemented. About 9,000 existing annual service hours are assisted with Orange County Transit Plan funds. An anticipated 30,000 — 45,000 additional bus service hours may be available following implementation of D -O LRT. These "rail dividend hours" reflect bus service currently operating in the D -O LRT corridor that could be redirected to meet other Orange County transit priorities. ■ Bus Capital Projects The purchase of new vehicles (and subsequent replacement) to support the service funded by the Orange County Transit Plan. Bus facility improvements to facilitate transit access and improve the customer experience, including new park- and -ride lots, improved transit amenities, and access improvements (e.g. new sidewalks) to bus stops. ■ Hillsborough Train Station — 2020 completion date The station will be served by two Amtrak passenger routes. ■ North -South Bus Rapid Transit (N -S BRT) — 2023 estimated completion date Bus rapid transit service using a mix of dedicated and mixed - traffic lanes between the Eubanks Road and Southern Village park- and -ride facilities, with direct service to UNC Hospitals. ■ Durham - Orange Light Rail Transit (D -O LRT) — 2028 estimated completion date Light rail transit service between UNC Hospitals in Chapel Hill and North Carolina Central University (NCCU) in Durham, providing 50,000 hours of transit service. Project includes bicycle, pedestrian and bus infrastructure improvements along the alignment. ■ Durham - Orange Light Rail Transit Extension (D -O LRT) — 2045 est. completion date Light rail transit will be extended from the UNC Hospitals station to a station near Main Street in Carrboro. The route, along S Columbia St and W Cameron Ave, is a conceptual placeholder until further study can be completed. This extension is not in the Orange County Transit Plan. It will be financed in the last decade of the 2045 MTP by assuming that legislative restrictions that currently restrict funding that can be used for transit will be repealed. ■ Wake- Durham Commuter Rail Extension (CRT) — 2045 estimated completion date Commuter rail service will be extended from West Durham to Hillsborough, with a station at NC 10 /US 70 area and S Churton St /US 70 Business. This extension is not in ., the Orange County Transit Plan. It will be financed in the last decade of the 2045 MTP by assuming that legislative restrictions that currently restrict funding that can be used for transit will be repealed. Chatham County Services The express bus services from Pittsboro to UNC and the UNC Hospitals will be improved in frequency and service hours. Bus stops and stations will be increased and improved. Fixed Guideway Maps The following three pages are MPO- level, Durham close -up and Chapel Hill /Carrboro close -up maps of the fixed - guideway services in the Preferred Option. Fixed guideway includes light rail transit, commuter rail transit and bus rapid transit. An interactive, online map is also available at the Fixed - Guideway map tile at the top of the following MTP Web page: www.bit.ly /DCHC- MTP - Preferred 95 /nom n 1 � U _M n O >' co CU C)- f�n V �X I M O OL O 0 Ca G i n 0 IL ca • � �� ��� � �' .2 .mac U +' �k O a� III W' X fA poi � rn ol LLJ U) c w rr/a //; o c� c ?�c ...,,.... (� co O O O �� 8jrh "N� i J 0 0 0 U U m ¢ U o 'Al I w w" of 0 N N Z CL Wtv"alt v _ H k, ef 2-Z m° a U) lld /!1 u,` ONES �1�1duj� � V,N� � � VXy,y �, .` E O 00 R, 5'dw' w w ' '' ;; X, m mx �o E CL � II Wm v,� r I dR INf4N' ry/« lyi� D E Q�n � VNV6' ,'� „L arn� o i� I Y wM t, f ✓�r q M, w N ," vIR�{"4^, %dU" wxN"D) o �'E It a IV11VIw" U) CJ =' U w %b a'Y c F 1„ pff /dal wA Of og oo III o° If PAW 11,10 ro ; " E r dx e IF r '�i,J woo i`s = Ny y �w l✓�, / �, �"�rP,,p, r ' lkff ctl ol �� is �a rFa k mk) r /10—IS n CU n O M L Q c M M 0 O L- 4--j a) O Q O U w cn U N .O n \V f� V H O CL O L L O O C o O °? Co Co o (n J 0 C O U) C N x W a� O U a � "»4`3N 0 AV 41CJ,511141�) 11" A a po, -a IS 9 1'3 moll, DOME) N r � /G u� "Al Al " a � "»4`3N 0 AV 41CJ,511141�) 11" A a po, -a IS 9 1'3 moll, DOME) N Z i �r I U o Z m iris O 2 Q� If //i E `� p fu�� ja i "„ pro CO u I41 y c L Z aAV � r ANN" th raj, apeop U1111i ltiri r r f i! r� , to cvr01 AV b� u w 411k Q , Lu /f �� �� w ,� � auw^ r m ! pA ?w r� w � i � „ (,),Y Y oa` n 'n *Y r I�f Ids ^ 1 U _, U "nA 4rB , 0u& rfr �' u 'p jo u w flw (d !!� ✓mw ri ' � a �u A„ a I 9,. �, ..... .. ......_, , . . L „� "off Gl r � � c Yap "Al Al " „y J' '� I U o Z m iris O 2 Q� If //i E `� p fu�� ja i "„ pro CO u I41 y c L Z aAV � r ANN" th raj, apeop U1111i ltiri r r f i! r� , to cvr01 AV b� u w 411k Q , Lu /f �� �� w ,� � auw^ r m ! pA ?w r� w � i � „ (,),Y Y oa` n 'n *Y r I�f Ids ^ 1 U _, U "nA 4rB , 0u& rfr �' u 'p jo u w flw (d !!� ✓mw ri ' � a �u A„ a I 9,. �, ..... .. ......_, , . . L „� to cvr01 AV b� u w 411k Q , Lu /f �� �� w ,� � auw^ r m ! pA ?w r� w � i � „ (,),Y Y oa` n 'n *Y r I�f Ids ^ 1 U _, U "nA 4rB , 0u& rfr �' u 'p jo u w flw (d !!� ✓mw ri ' � a �u A„ a I 9,. �, ..... .. ......_, , . . L „� 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) Preferred Option -- Fixed Guidewjjy Project -- Chapel Hill /Carrboro Close-up %,�,, rd X60 North -South BRT Stations d11g1e11m LRT Stations II Cr.rlbainilh Ili ad II WOW !'s'' D -O LRT � ,�i�t2l�//�ip ✓/i /0 /7l /��y rrcva imlaiiiatr✓ ,. �q ..° D -O LRT Route Extension "'y Ind ( "����� BRT Route Weaver Ilauu cr r".aw^wwl �,?��'aa� V'^fiw.V �>�r� e.Ua Palrkslde Drive R 0 rms 4 c'mr V ^.aiP M f ice" ��p of r6 z, //F � N p naao Nru °i:iva:lld ILDuuvx 1�'� d� at �� �6� L �� it / %//l Oild ii hain Rd „wr.1u^c 0 m r 131ineyIMountaunRd Il.. :.stes Ildve N Fu olt ii,?,d r "V k" w te' , DF py wII ICAOIfO "' Aiiq"o t L r Cwyu ry P,'er N" Isr i4d l T'Wrordu °ab RA°s l 13 014 uarc V,.ror.�a� 0,4a � n hi.4k'i °Hit U i J U "d�VNgsborouC W Streetl:� � , " 0 r'� Ur.. zmotic b "ho- rt� Chapel ill w ww` �1 r�ili) Fire wiikfin Street r ro C' " boro Station e 14 M Cat Cameron �"r Caurneirawn Awenru m• ��rn IN, �0 namauiL.'a^ Ir m� �''I'R�WQ'"0.' �i'w'�,.'. �' � �� Stu ,. � �u ~M „' i uoi�ru °ruuugta�u�pll�rNti .ww spy v 'Ham.01ton Road UNC H ; als "u�aa�cu�ilePlwa�uu fair a �.. Center rive d> �x �, ont "t� u��u Mason Fa Koad ww � "w u� ? •u Rap'R,'. .. NC 5 4 �� uPfl'R "MWM4hr ^Pi q:� uretb N � f u7�I�FM'l a maa'a"bw �r�x rnf4V 4�k r' f a Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Int&rnap, increment P Corp., NRCAN, Esri So tiern �/ 111age If IP ��" Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), TomTong8apmylndia, © L ' z "' penstreetMap contributors, and the GIS,User Community Bicycle, Pedestrian and Multiuse Paths Summary The 2045 MTP does not specifically list the bicycle and pedestrian projects. The local jurisdictions and counties have identified, and in many cases prioritized these projects and have coordinated their interaction in the jurisdiction boundary areas through the DCHC MPO. As a result, the 2045 MTP defers to those local governments. The financial plan provides $225 million to implement these projects; that is $75 million for each decade in the 2045 MTP. Local Plans Bicycle The DCHC MPO adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) in May 2017 in cooperation with the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT). The CTP lists all the local bicycle projects from the jurisdiction and county plans in the MPO area. • CTP Web site: http: / /bit.ly /DCHCMPO- Adopted -CTP The local plans provide details on the planned facilities at the following links: Pedestrian Local pedestrian plans include: • Chapel Hill Bicycle and Pedestrian Action Plan (2004) -- http: / /bit.ly /2�bvgi • Durham Walks! Pedestrian Plan (2006) -- http: / /bit.ly /1Y66mfG • Durham Bike +Walk Implementation Plan (2017) -- http: / /bit.ly /2p2yHJS • Hillsborough Community Connectivity Plan (2009) -- http: / /bit.ly /1Uan3VO MPO Policy The MPO bicycle and pedestrian policy basically expects any roadway or other transportation project, whether it is a new or improved facility, to include appropriate pedestrian and bicycle accommodations. That policy provides extensive integration of bicycle and pedestrian needs into the design and construction of new and improved highway and other transportation projects. In addition, the "NCDOT Complete Streets Planning and Design Guidelines" and other 9 FIE, related guidelines provide planning and design guidance for use when building new projects or making changes to existing infrastructure. 100 Financial Plan Background and Assumptions The MPO created and reviewed three financial projections in the Alternatives Analysis: Constrained; Moderate; and, Optimistic (formerly known as Aspirational). The Preferred Option uses the Optimistic financial projection, and breaks out the Costs and Revenues by the funding decades, i.e., 2025, 2035 and 2045. It is important to note that the financial plan abides by the North Carolina STI (Strategic Transportation Investment) legislation and policy in the first two decades, i.e., 2025 and 2035. In the third decade, 2045, the financial plan assumes that statewide and national policy would relax restrictions on the use of funding for transit projects, and permit the use of some traditional highway funding to be used to extend the Commuter Rail Transit (CRT) and Light Rail Transit (LRT) lines. The text below provides notes for the financial table that follows the text. There are two graphs after the financial table that depict major financial themes. Cost Table Roadways and Alternative Transportation The roadway costs are broken out by the three North Carolina STI (Strategic Transportation Investment) funding tiers to abide by the current state policy. The highway costs mostly use TIP estimates, recent feasibility studies, or the 2016 NCDOT highway cost workbook to calculate the individual project cost. Maintenance costs are based on the STI and NCDOT statewide plan. The estimated alternative transportation costs are shown for Bicycle and Pedestrian, Transportation Demand Management (TDM), Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and Transportation System Management (TSM). These programs do not have individual projects listed in the 2045 MTP and thus the program cost is a single estimate rather than the sum of the listed projects. The assumed STI tier is also shown in parenthesis in the program title. Transit The transit costs and revenues are based on the Durham County Transit Plan and Orange County Transit Plan that were recently updated in 2017. The costs are broken out by existing and new /expanded services because of the policy of those plans and the funding restrictions of the revenue sources. 101 Additional Transit These are costs that are not included in the county plan transit costs. The transit funding match is a regional cost for the state capital match for the Durham - Orange Light Rail Transit project. The extension of the CRT and LRT are regional funds that the MPO assumes will be available for transit capital and other expenses in the last decade of the 2045 MTP. Currently, the STI regional funds are capped at 10% of the total project cost for transit projects, which would not allow the STI funding to be used for these extensions. However, the MPO assumes that this restriction would be repealed as urban areas like those in the MPO become increasingly reliant on public transportation to provide sustainable transportation. Revenue Table STI /Local /Private The STI revenues are based on the Optimistic financial scenario and abide by the STI requirements and methodology throughout the entire 2045 MTP, or the year 2045. Maintenance revenues match the costs. Local funding are estimates based on the current 2040 MTP and a modest growth rate. CMAQ funding is based on the STI. Private funding is mostly summed from the 2045 MTP highway projects that are expected to be constructed by private concerns. Transit The transit costs and revenues are based on the Durham County Transit Plan and Orange County Transit Plan that were recently updated in 2017. Balance Table This table is a tool to help guide changes in the project lists and financial plan during the public input period of the Preferred Option. It shows the balance (i.e., revenue minus cost) by STI tier and decade. The values in parenthesis are negative, meaning that the costs are greater than the revenues. 102 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Draft Preferred Option -- Financial Plan STS Uses Optimistic Financial Projection (in millions $) Roadways & Alternative Transportation 2025 2035 2045 Total Roadways (statewide) 480 1,048 1,090 2,618 Roadways (regional) 24 192 138 354 Roadways (division) 53 167 209 429 Maintenance (all) 874 1,242 1,409 3,525 Bicycle & Pedestrian (division) 90 90 90 270 Transportation Demand Management (division) 13 13 13 38 Intelligent Transportation Systems (statewide) 20 20 20 60 Transportation System Management (all) 40 40 40 120 Total Roadway and Alternate 1,592 2,812 3,009 7,414 Transit Continued Transit Funding to Support Existing Services 386 482 482 1,350 Funding for New /Expanded Transit Services 1,261 1,207 471 2,939 Additional Transit Transit funding match, etc. (regional) 95 96 - 191 Extend CRT from West Durham to Hillsborough (regional) - - 173 173 Extend LRT from Chapel Hill to Carrboro (regional) 75 75 Total Transit 1,742 1,785 1,201 4,728 Total Costs 3,334 4,597 4,210 12,141, REVENUES STI /Local /Private 2025 2035 2045 Total STI (statewide) 542 898 981 2,421 STI (regional) 132 373 423 928 STI (division) 122 228 256 606 Maintenance (all) 874 1,242 1,409 3,525 Toll Revenue (statewide) 0.1 196 - 196 Local Funding (bicycle /pedestrian) (division) 35 20 20 75 Local Funding (roadway) (division) 25 25 25 75 Private Funds (division) 27 30 24 81 CMAQ Funding (division) 17 18 15 49 Total STI /Local /Private 1,773 3,029 3,153 7,956 103 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Draft Preferred Option -- Financial Plan Transit (parenthesis are negative values) Continued Transit Funding to Support Existing Services 386 482 482 1,350 Funding for New /Expanded Transit Services 1,261 1,207 471 2,939 Total Transit 1,647 1,689 953 4,289 (7) 65 17 Total Revenues 3,420 4,71.9 4,106 1.2,244 104 (parenthesis are negative values) BALANCE 2025 2035 2045 Total Statewide 32 15 (139) (92) Regional (7) 65 17 75 Division 61 41 18 120 Total Balance 86 121 (1 04) 3 104 Graphics The bar chart below shows the percent of the total investment by mode for each of the three decades. Transit investments are relatively larger in the first two decades because of the large capital investments in light rail and commuter rail. 100 90% 80 Bike /Ped /TDM 70% 60% IIIIIIII Transit 50% 40% IIIIIIII Roadway Maintenance 30% 11 1 Roadway 20% Improvements 10% 0% 2025 2035 2045 The pie graph below shows the percent of total investment, i.e., 2025, 2035 and 2045, by mode. Roadway improvements and roadway maintenance are the same. The transit, bicycle, pedestrian and TDM investment is less than one -half of the total, 42 %. It is difficult to get these investments higher and continue to mostly abide to the STI funding restrictions. Total MTP Costs by Mode Bike /Ped /TDM 3% 105 106 Item 6.c. ORANGE COUNTY ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS INPUT FOR COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' ANNUAL PLANNING RETREAT The Board of Commissioners welcomes input from various advisory boards and commissions in preparation for its annual planning retreat. Please complete the following information, limited to the front and back of this form. Other background materials may be provided as a supplement to, but not as a substitute for, this form. NAME OF BOARD /COMMISSION: Orange Unified Transportation Board (OUTBoard) Report Period: 2017 Person to address the BOCC at Retreat (if requested by BOCC) and contact information: Heidi Perry, Chair. Telephone 919 - 618 -8199 E -mail: heidiperov @gmail.com Primary County Staff Contacts: Primary Administrative and Professional Support for General Agenda Topics — Abigaile Pittman, Transportation /Land Use Planner Burlington- Graham Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) — Abigaile Pittman, Transportation /Land Use Planner Durham - Chapel Hill - Carrboro MPO and Triangle Area Rural Planning Organization (RPO) — Nish Trivedi, Transportation Planner Transit Services /OPT — Theo Letman, OCPT Director, and Peter Murphy, OCPT Transportation Administrator Secondary Administrative — Meredith Pucci, Administrative Assistant (Provided for distribution /website posting of agenda packets, quorum polling, room set -up, recording of meetings, note taking and preparation of detailed minutes, and coordination with the Clerk's office regarding Member appointments and attendance records.) Management — Craig Benedict, Planning Director; Tom Altieri, Comprehensive Planning Supervisor How many times per month does this board /commission meet, including any special meetings and sub - committee meetings? The OUTBoard meets as needed per its BOCC adopted Rules of Procedure (09/06/2016), generally 6 to 8 times per year. When held, meetings take place on the third Wednesday of the month. The Board met eight (8) times in 2017, as needed to address Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) priorities. At three (3) of these meetings the Transit Advisory Services /OPT Group, including 107 supplemental staff from other County departments (Aging; DSS; Housing, Human Rights and Community Development; health; Child Support Enforcement; and the Library) jointly addressed transit services agenda items with the OUTBoard. Additionally, two members of the OUTBoard were appointed to a Bicycle Safety Task Force (BSTF) along with sixteen other people representing stakeholder groups. The BSTF meetings began with eight meetings in 2016, and one meeting in 2017. The full OUTBoard reviewed and approved the final BSTF Report over the course of two meetings and then it was forwarded on to the BOCC. Following completion of the Report, an implementation subcommittee of the OUTBoard was formed that included three members of the OUTBoard. This subcommittee has been meeting, with staff support, every three weeks since July 2017. Members of the previous BSTF have been invited to contribute. Brief Statement of Board /Commission's Assigned Charge and Responsibilities: 1. The OUTBoard is charged with advising with Board of County Commissioners on the planning and programming of transportation infrastructure improvements and other County transportation planning initiatives, as directed by the Board 2. From time to time the OUTBoard may be directed to provide input on regulations on which the Planning Board has primary statutory and local ordinance advisory duties. In such instances, the OUTBoard shall serve in an advisory capacity to the Planning Board. What are your Board /Commission's most important accomplishments? In 2017, the OUTBoard has: 1. Jointly addressed transit topics relating to Orange County Public Transit (OCPT), with supplemental staff from other County departments (Aging; DSS; Housing, Human Rights and Community Development; Health; Child Support Enforcement; and the Library: a. Reviewed and provided comments on the OPT Quarterly Operational Statistics, including Orange County ridership data 2016 -2017. b. Received an update on efforts to hire new drivers. c. Reviewed and commented on the status of OPT expansion services, including new services started, bus purchase options, and vehicles already received. • Efland Commuter Loop • Route 70 Connector (Orange - Alamance Connector) • Rural 2 days per week Zonal Routes d. Received an update on the revisions to reporting and processing requirements for Non - emergency Medical Transportation (NEMT, Medicaid Transportation) and made a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) to support the additional staffing as w needed to support the processing of the new reporting requirements. e. Received an update on Transit Scheduling and Planning Software upgrades and procurements: • CTS Scheduling software upgrades • REM IX Transit planning software procurement 2. Reviewed possible implementation activities related to the Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Plan. 3. Recommended the Orange Grove Road Bridge Fencing project. 4. As an informational item, provided a review of the statutory road closing process. 5. Provided an update on the Mountain -to -Sea Trail (MST). 6. Provided an update on the Eno EDD sewer project, proposed development, and access management plan. 7. Reviewed, provided comments and endorsed the Draft Durham - Chapel Hill - Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization (DCHC MPO) Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP). 8. Received an update on the DCHC MPO Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) 9. Received and reviewed regular updates regarding NCDOT Division 7 projects located in the Durham - Chapel Hill - Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization (DCHC MPO), (Burlington- Graham Metropolitan Planning Organization) BG MPO, and (Triangle Area Rural Planning Organization) TARPO. 10. Reviewed the methodology for identifying and ranking new Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) project requests for the DCHC MPO, the BG MPO, and the TARPO. 11. Received and reviewed information regarding Orange County's SPOT 5.0 project lists and scores submitted by the DCHC MPO, the BG MPO, and the TARPO and NCDOT for ultimate consideration of inclusion in the 2020 -2028 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). 12.Appointed Bicycle Safety Implementation Subcommittee, and participated in review and comments at regular OUTBoard meetings. 109 13. List of Specific Tasks, Events, or Functions Performed or Sponsored Annually. 1. The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is typically a recurring two -year process: First year: Develops priority list of projects to request in TIP for BOCC approval. Second year: Recommends comments regarding draft TIP for BOCC approval to submit to NCDOT during the public comment period. The OUTBoard assists with the identification and prioritization of NCDOT projects for rural (TARPO) and metropolitan (DCHC MPO and BG MPO) planning areas. 2. Reviews active NCDOT projects in the County, including various paving, construction and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Grant projects. 3. Receives updates and reviews the progress of NCDOT transportation projects within rural Orange County. 4. Receives updates and reviews the progress of Orange County transportation planning efforts. 5. Receives updates and reviews OCPT Operational Statistics for federal and state program transportation grants including the North Carolina Department of Transportation Rural Operating Assistance Program (ROAP) Grant, NC Community Transportation Program (CTP) Grant, and the CMAQ Grant. 6. Receives updates on TARPO, BG MPO and DCHC MPO transportation planning activities. 7. Receives updates from the Planning staff on the NCDOT quarterly luncheon topics of discussion. 8. Submits comments and questions for discussion with OCPT staff during Transit/OPT Advisory Services Group meetings. 9. Reviews and discusses current Board vacancies. 10. Other items as assigned by the BOCC. 110 Describe this board /commission's activities /accomplishments in carrying out BOCC goal(s) /priorities, if applicable. The following pertains to the 2009 BOCC Goals set: Orange County BOCC Goals and Priorities OUTBoard Accomplishments (From Pages 2 -3) Goal One: Ensure a community network of basic human la, lc, 1 d, le services and infrastructure that maintains, protects and promotes the well -being of all County residents. Goal Two: Promote an interactive and transparent 1, 7, 10, 11 system of governance that reflects community values. Goal Three: Implement planning and economic la, lc, le, 6, 7, 9, 10, development policies which create a balanced, dynamic 11 local economy, and which promote diversity, sustainable growth and enhanced revenue while embracing community values Priority 20: Support transit, pedestrian, and bicycle 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 11, facilities and other alternatives to the single 12 passenger automobile. Goal Four: Invest in quality County facilities, a diverse 6 work force, and technology to achieve a high performing County government. Priority 11: Invest in technology to increase work 1 d, le efficiencies; e.g. web streaming, paperless agendas, integrated tracking systems between field and office. Priority 22: Review and update County personnel 1 b, 1 d and operational policies and procedures. Goal Five: Create, preserve, and protect a natural 17 5 environment that includes clean water, clean air, wildlife, important natural lands and sustainable energy for resent and future generations. Goal Six: Ensure a high quality of life and lifelong 17 5 learning that champions diversity, education at all levels, libraries, parks, recreation, and animal welfare. 111 If your board /commission played the role of an Element Lead Advisory Board involved in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan preparation process, please indicate your board's activities /accomplishments as they may relate to the Comprehensive Plan's goals or objectives. (The Element Lead Advisory Boards include: Planning Board, EDC, OUTBoard, Commission for the Environment, Historic Preservation Commission, Agriculture Preservation Board, Affordable Housing Board, Recreation and Parks Advisory Council) Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan OUTBoard Goals or Objectives, as applicable Accomplishments (From Pages 2 -3) Transportation Goal 1: An efficient and integrated 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 11, 12 multi -modal transportation system that protects the natural environment and community character. Objective T -1.1: Increase the occupancy of 1, 12 automobiles through ridesharing and other means; and expand the use of public transit (including bus and rail), walking, and biking as primary modes of travel. Objective T -1.2: Facilitate the overall development 1 and use of a transportation system that is more energy- efficient, reduces carbon emissions, and reduces the use of fossil fuels while promoting the use of local renewable and sustainable fuels. Objective T -1.3: Develop new transportation 1 facilities in a manner that has a positive impact or avoids negative impacts on the natural environment, including air quality, water resources, biological resources, and wildlife habitat. Objective T -1.4: Develop new transportation 17 11 facilities in a manner that has a positive impact or avoids negative impacts on the community, including historical or cultural assets, existing neighborhoods, schools and recreational facilities, and the overall rural character in Orange County. Objective T -1.5: Identify prime view sheds along 5 major transportation corridors and protect these areas for their scenic and natural resource values. Objective T -1.6: Expand the availability and use of 1 public transportation (including bus and rail) throughout the County to provide better connections between employment centers, shopping and service locations, and other key points of interest in both urban and rural areas, particularly for the County's senior and disabled populations and others without access to automobiles. 112 Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan OUTBoard Goals or Objectives, as applicable Accomplishments From Pages 2 -3 Transportation Goal 2: A multi -modal transportation 1 system that is affordable, available, and accessible to all users and that promotes public health and safety. Objective T -2.1: Increase the provision of bikeways 5, 12 and walkways, and also increase supportive facilities such as bicycle parking zones. Objective T -2.2: Evaluate and serve special 1 transportation needs of the senior population, youth, the economically disadvantaged and the disabled, including both everyday needs and disaster transit provision. Objective T -2.4: Improve the provision of public 1 transit facilities and services, and also increase supportive facilities for transit, such as park and ride lots. Objective T -2.5: Improve public education and 1a advertising of existing transit services. Objective T -2.6: Increase safety awareness 12 between car drivers and bicycle riders, and increase safety for pedestrians. Objective T -2.7: Construct bicycle facilities in Orange 2, 5, 11, 12 County that will make cycling safer, more convenient, and more efficient. Transportation Goal 3: Integrated land use planning 5, 6, 11 and transportation planning that serves existing development, supports future development, and is consistent with the County's land use plans which include provisions for preserving the natural environment and community character. Objective T -3.1: Improve the County's transportation 1 system by first enhancing existing facilities as opposed to developing new facilities. Objective T -3.2: Create and implement an Orange 6,7 County Comprehensive Transportation Plan that provides the framework for a comprehensive and connected transportation system supporting a mix of all transportation modes, including sidewalks and bicycle facilities, bus and rail transit facilities, and highways. The plan should be coordinated with the goals and objectives of this Comprehensive Plan and seek to maintain and enhance community character and the natural environment. 113 Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan OUTBoard Goals or Objectives, as applicable Accomplishments From Pages 2 -3 Objective T -3.3: Determine the policies to guide 5, 6, 7 connectivity within and between residential developments based on their impact on neighborhood character. Objective T -3.4: Direct development to higher 6,7 density mixed -use districts along transit corridors and make necessary multi -modal transportation improvements to service lands that are slated for future intense development, such as Economic Development Districts Objective T -3.5: Use innovative techniques to 1 increase mobility and reduce rush hour congestion. Transportation Goal 4: A countywide and regionally- 1, 7, 10, 11 integrated, multi -modal transportation planning process that is comprehensive, creative and effective. Objective T -4.1: Work with nearby jurisdictions to 1, 7, 10, 11, 12 integrate the County's transportation plans with those of other transportation planning agencies and service providers in Orange County and the Triangle region. The resulting intermodal transportation system should reflect regional goals and objectives to meet projected travel demand and to reduce congestion and reliance on single occupancy vehicles. Objective T -4.2: Plan and integrate the County's 1, 11 multi -modal transportation routes and services with regional transportation agencies and transit service providers, agencies and transit providers in neighboring counties, the North Carolina Department of Transportation, Amtrak, and the North Carolina Railroad. Objective T-4.3: Revive rail transportation in Orange 7, 10 County and the Triangle region. 114 Identify any activities this board /commission expects to carry out in 2018 as they relate to established BOCC goals and priorities. If applicable, is there a fiscal impact (i.e., funding, staff time, other resources) associated with these proposed activities (please list). 1. Continue to review and make recommendations implementation efforts for the Bicycle Safety Task Force Report to the BOCC (BOCC Goal 3, Priority 20). 2. Review, comment and make a recommendation on the regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan being developed by the Burlington- Graham Metropolitan Planning Organization (B -G MPO) (BOCC Goal 3, Priority 20). 3. Review and comment on amendments to the UDO and revised Efland- Buckhorn- Mebane Access Management Plan (BOCC Goal 3). 4. Continue to work with staff and the BOCC to recommend and monitor Orange County Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) projects, including recommending new projects in 2018 (BOCC Goal 3, Priority 20). 5. Continue to coordinate with the Orange County Department of Aging Mobility Manager on implementation efforts of the Master Aging Plan Transportation Goals (BOCC Goal 3, Priority 20). 6. Continue quarterly Transit Advisory Services /OPT meetings to discuss unmet needs in the service area, service design and scheduling, marketing, billing rates and fares, resolve complaints; and to monitor compliance with federal regulations and the status of any deficiencies noted in any official federal, state or local review or report (BOCC Goal 3, Priority 20). 7. Review, comment and make recommendations on the NC Hwy 54 feasibility study being in DCHC MPO, TARPO and B -G MPO jurisdictions (BOCC Goal 3, Priority 20). 8. Review, comment and make recommendations on the B -G MPO CTP/ MTP (BOCC Goal 3, Priority 20). 9. Review, comment and make recommendations on the following revisions of the Orange County CTP for the TARPO portion of the County (BOCC Goal 3, Priority 20) a. Change the CTP designation on NC Hwy 86 from "Expressway Needs Improvement" to "Major Thoroughfare Existing ", b. Update the pedestrian map to show some corrected planned trail information that was incorrect on the original maps. c. Examine whether or not improvements were necessary /appropriate on the TARPO portion of Buckhorn Road (south of West Ten Road). 10. In 2018 B -G MPO will be coordinating with NCDOT /NCAMPO on projects and programs that support the use of alternative fuels, electric and autonomous /connected vehicles. The OUTBoard may be required to 115 review, comment and make recommendations on these projects (BOCC Goal 3, Priority 20). 11. Review, comment and make recommendations on the rankings of Orange County transportation projects as part of the TARPO, DCHC MPO and B- G MPO STI local input processes. This will occur after NCDOT releases its draft SPOT 5.0 project scores (BOCC Goal 3, Priority 20). 12. Continue to jointly addressed transit topics relating to Orange County Public Transit (OPCT), with supplemental staff from other County departments (Aging; DSS; Housing, Human Rights and Community Development; Health; Child Support Enforcement; and the Library), including new bus routes proposed to be initiated in 2017 (BOCC Goal 3, Priority 20). 13. Review, comment, and make recommendations on annual federal appropriations for programs 5307, 53407 5339 and 5310 grant allocations for Orange County Public Transit (OPCT). (BOCC Goal 3, Priority 20). 14. If referred by the BOCC: a. Implementation efforts related to the Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Action Plan (BOCC Goal 3, Priority 20). What are the concerns or emerging issues your board has identified for the upcoming year that it plans to address, or wishes to bring to the Commissioners' attention? 1. Continue to explore implementation opportunities for Safe Routes to School (SRTS) projects; 2. Pursuit of funding sources for prioritized transportation projects and track status of project implementation; 3. Coordinate connectivity and infrastructural changes with the towns in order to create better conditions for bicycling and other alternate forms of non - motorized transportation; 4. Work with NCDOT to promote funding of pedestrian and bicycle projects in rural areas to a greater degree. 116 Item 8.a. October 16, 2017 Wannetta Mallette - Transportation Planner Burlington- Graham MPO 234 East Summit Avenue Burlington, NC 27215 Re: October 17, 2017 B -G MPO Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC) and Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) Agenda Items — Approval of the Prioritization 5.0 Project Submission List Dear Ms. Mallette: Comments on Process: Orange County and other MPO member governments each submitted their transportation project lists to MPO staff earlier this year. Since BGMPO has a limit on the number of projects it can submit for scoring through the NCDOT Strategic Prioritization Office (SPOT) 5.0 process, MPO staff used very preliminary scores, using SPOT 4.0 calculations, to identify the shortened list of projects that would continue through the SPOT 5.0 process. NCDOT is currently conducting a detailed review of all submitted projects; it will apply its criteria, alternative weights, and cost analysis along with any normalization curve NCDOT deems necessary in calculating the actual 5.0 scores which are to be released in March 2018. It is likely that the same transportation project scored using SPOT 4.0 will score differently during SPOT 5.0. The deadline for submittal of BGMPO transportation projects for further consideration during the SPOT 5.0 process was September 29, 2017. Assuming MPO staff met the deadline and submitted projects on behalf of the MPO, the list of projects included in the October 17 TCC and TAC agenda packets is now for the purpose of the Committees information only. Orange County posits that the TCC and TAC should have received the list of projects in advance of MPO staff's submittal. The MPO no longer has the ability to make adjustments to its list of submitted projects for further consideration during the SPOT process. However, it does have the ability to further prioritize the list of projects submitted through the assignment of Local Input Points, which is to occur in April 2018. It may very well be that projects ranked 18 -22 based on SPOT 4.0 preliminary scores would be better suited for SPOT 5.0 scoring or should at least be discussed regarding their relative importance. According to North Carolina's Strategic Transportation Investment Law, the first step in establishing the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) is taken through the SPOT process. The adopted STIP is what local MPO's use to develop their own Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Therefore, and consistent with the BGMPO Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), the TCC is to provide recommendations to the TAC for its review and approval of transportation projects prior \\N\ 117 to submittal to NCDOT. This would allow an opportunity for some discussion of geographic equity in the list of submitted projects among other considerations. Orange County requests that the BGMPO re- evaluate its process for submitting projects to SPOT and include its TCC and TAC in the decision making process before submittal of projects to NCDOT for scoring through any SPOT 6.0 process. Comments on Two Specific Transportation Projects: • The NC -54 widening from US 119 in Alamance County to Orange Grove Road in Orange County was submitted for SPOT 5.0 without any coordination among Orange County and the Triangle Area Regional Planning Organization (TARPO). Opposition has been expressed on any plans to widen subject to completion of a NC54 Corridor Study that is currently underway. Significant Orange County efforts have been underway to prepare and promote economic development in the Efland - Buckhorn- Mebane area, with Buckhorn Road prominently featured. This is an area of considerable existing truck traffic with changes in land uses and traffic generation anticipated. One of Orange County's three projects submitted to the BGMPO earlier this year was, " Buckhorn Road (SR -1114) widen from West Ten Road (SR 1144) to US 70, with bicycle and pedestrian accommodations ". Should an opportunity arise, Orange County would like to see this project considered further through SPOT 5.0. Thank you in advance for consideration of Orange County's concerns. Regards, w Craig B nedict, Planning Department Director cc: Barry Jacobs, Board of County Commissioners Mark Marcoplos, Board of County Commissioners Abigaile Pittman, Transportation /Land Use Planner \\1\ 118 ProgLoc Search I MEMO, 1:7 Contract Number: C203394 Route: 1 -885, NC -147, NC -98 US-70 Division: 5 County: Durham TIP Number: U -0071 Length: 4.009 miles Federal Aid Number: NCDOT Contact: Cameron D. Richards NCDOT Contact No: (919)840 -0914 Location Description: EAST END CONNECTOR FROM NORTH OF NC -98 TO NC -147 (BUCK DEAN FREEWAY) IN DURHAM. Contractor Name: DRAGADOS USA INC Contract Amount: $141,949,500.00 Cost Overrun /Underrun: 4.89% Work Began: 02/26/2015 Letting Date: 11/18/2014 Original Completion Date: 05/10/2020 Revised Completion Date: Latest Payment Thru: 09/30/2017 Scheduled Progress: 52.09% Latest Payment Date: 09/28/2017 Actual Progress: 52.67% Contract Number: C203492 Route: SR -2220 Division: 5 County: Durham TIP Number: EB -4707B Length: 1.756 miles Federal Aid Number: STPDA- 0505(64) NCDOT Contact: Troy B. Brooks, PE NCDOT Contact No: (919)220 -4680 Location Description: SR -2220 (OLD CHAPEL HILL ROAD) FROM SR -1113 (POPE ROAD) TO SR -1116 (GARRETT ROAD). Contractor Name: FSC 11 LLC DBA FRED SMITH COMPANY Contract Amount: $7,295,544.75 Cost Overrun /Underrun: 0.33% Work Began: 06/26/2017 Letting Date: 05/16/2017 Original Completion Date: 05/14/2019 Revised Completion Date: Latest Payment Thru: 08/31/2017 Scheduled Progress: 9.37% Latest Payment Date: 09/12/2017 Actual Progress: 10.32% Contract Number: C203567 Route: NC -55 Division: 5 County: Durham TIP Number: U -3308 Length: 1.134 miles Federal Aid Number: STP- 55(20) NCDOT Contact: Troy B. Brooks, PE NCDOT Contact No: (919)220 -4680 Location Description: NC -55 (ALSTON AVE) FROM NC -147 (BUCK DEAN FREEWAY) TO NORTH OF US- 70BUS/NC-98 (HOLLOWAY ST). Contractor Name: ZACHRY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION Contract Amount: $39,756,916.81 Cost Overrun /Underrun: 1.5% Work Began: 10/05/2016 Letting Date: 07/19/2016 Original Completion Date: 03/30/2020 Revised Completion Date: 07/16/2020 Latest Payment Thru: 09/15/2017 Scheduled Progress: 14% Latest Payment Date: 09/25/2017 Actual Progress: 18.45% Contract Number: DE00172 Route: 1 -540 Division: 5 County: Durham TIP Number: 1 -5307B Length: 0 miles Federal Aid Number: IM- 0540(035) NCDOT Contact: Cameron D. Richards NCDOT Contact No: (919)840 -0914 Location Description: BRIDGE #342 ON 1 -540 OVER 1 -40 & NW EXPRESSWAY IN DURHAM COUNTY Contractor Name: PROSHOT CONCRETE, INC. Contract Amount: $509,276.00 Cost Overrun /Underrun: 0.01 % Work Began: 05/22/2017 Letting Date: 10/26/2016 Original Completion Date: 06/09/2017 Revised Completion Date: 07/14/2017 Latest Payment Thru: 07/14/2017 Scheduled Progress: 100% Latest Payment Date: 07/20/2017 Actual Progress: 39.22% Contract Number: DE00173 Route: SR -1104 Division: 5 County: Durham TIP Number: W -5205V Length: 0 miles Federal Aid Number: HSIP- 1104(19) NCDOT Contact: Troy B. Brooks, PE NCDOT Contact No: (919)220 -4680 Location Description: SR 1104/SR 1105 (HERNDON DURHAM COUNTY RD) AT SR 1106 (MASSEY CHAPEL/ BARBEE RD) IN Contractor Name: TRIANGLE GRADING & PAVING INC Contract Amount: $1,046,988.75 Cost Overrun /Underrun: 0.42% Work Began: 05/01/2017 Letting Date: 11/09/2016 Original Completion Date: 08/18/2017 Revised Completion Date: Latest Payment Thru: 09/15/2017 Scheduled Progress: 100% 119 https:H apps. ncdot. gov/ traffictravel /progloc /ProgLocSearch.aspx ProgLoc Search 11 Latest Payment Date: 09/28/2017 Actual Progress: 24.92% 11 Contract Number: DE00193 Route: 1 -85 Division: 5 County: Durham TIP Number: R- 4436EJ, Federal Aid Number: NHPP- 0085(027) R- 4436EK NCDOT Contact No: (919)220 -4680 Length: 0 miles Federal Aid Number: STP- 1637(004) NCDOT Contact: David B. Moore NCDOT Contact No: (919)562 -7000 Location Description: INTERCHANGE OF 1 -85 AND SR 1637 (DURHAM CO) AND 1 -85 AND NC 56 (GRANVILLE CO) Original Completion Date: 10/31/2017 Contractor Name: CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRACTING INC Contract Amount: $272,457.77 Cost Overrun /Underrun: 6.85% Work Began: 07/06/2017 Letting Date: 05/24/2017 Original Completion Date: 11/22/2017 Revised Completion Date: Latest Payment Thru: 08/31/2017 Scheduled Progress: 52% Latest Payment Date: 09/13/2017 Actual Progress: 49.53% II Contract Number: DE00195 Route: 1 -85 II Division: 5 County: Durham TIP Number: 1 -5729A NCDOT Contact No: (919)840 -0914 Length: 0 miles Federal Aid Number: NHPP- 0085(027) NCDOT Contact: Troy B. Brooks, PE NCDOT Contact No: (919)220 -4680 Location Description: 1 -85 FROM 0.5 MILES COUNTY W OF US 501 TO 0.1 MILES EAST OF SR 1827 IN DURHAM Contractor Name: FSC II LLC DBA FRED SMITH COMPANY Contract Amount: $3,797,637.47 Cost Overrun /Underrun: -0.54% Work Began: 07/22/2017 Letting Date: 03/08/2017 Original Completion Date: 10/31/2017 Revised Completion Date: Latest Payment Thru: 09/07/2017 Scheduled Progress: 64% Latest Payment Date: 09/13/2017 Actual Progress: 69.4% II Contract Number: DE00211 Route: - II Division: 5 County: Durham TIP Number: R -5785B NCDOT Contact No: (919)840 -0914 Length: 0 miles Federal Aid Number: TAP - 0505(079) NCDOT Contact: Troy B. Brooks, PE NCDOT Contact No: (919)220 -4680 Location Description: MUNICIPALITIES OVER 5,000 POPULATION VARIOUS ROUTES DIVISIONWIDE Contractor Name: CAROLINA EARTH MOVERS INC Contract Amount: $0.00 Cost Overrun /Underrun: 0% Work Began: 05/30/2017 Letting Date: 03/20/2017 Original Completion Date: 08/31/2017 Revised Completion Date: 05/09/2018 Latest Payment Thru: Scheduled Progress: 0% Latest Payment Date: Actual Progress: 0% II Contract Number: DE00212 Route: - II Division: 5 County: Durham TIP Number: R -5785A NCDOT Contact No: (919)840 -0914 Length: 0 miles Federal Aid Number: TAP - 0505(078) NCDOT Contact: David B. Moore NCDOT Contact No: (919)562 -7000 Location Description: MUNICIPALITIES LESS THAN 5,000 POPULATION VARIOUS ROUTES DIVISIONWIDE Contractor Name: CAROLINA EARTH MOVERS INC Contract Amount: $0.00 Cost Overrun /Underrun: 0% Work Began: Letting Date: 10/12/2016 Original Completion Date: 08/31/2017 Revised Completion Date: Latest Payment Thru: Scheduled Progress: 0% Latest Payment Date: Actual Progress: 0% Contract Number: DE00213 Route: NC -55 Division: 5 County: Durham TIP Number: Length: 0 miles Federal Aid Number: NCDOT Contact: Cameron D. Richards NCDOT Contact No: (919)840 -0914 Location Description: VARIOUS PRIMARY AND SECONDARY ROUTES IN DURHAM COUNTY Contractor Name: CAROLINA SUNROCK LLC Contract Amount: $0.00 Cost Overrun /Underrun: 0% Work Began: Letting Date: 06/28/2017 Original Completion Date: 06/01/2018 Revised Completion Date: Latest Payment Thru: Scheduled Progress: 0% Latest Payment Date: Actual Progress: 0% 120 https:H apps. ncdot. gov/ traffictravel /progloc /ProgLocSearch.aspx ProgLoc Search 121 https:H apps. ncdot. gov/ traffictravel /progloc /ProgLocSearch.aspx Contract Number: DE00214 Route: - Division: 5 County: Durham TIP Number: Length: 0 miles Federal Aid Number: NCDOT Contact: Troy B. Brooks, PE NCDOT Contact No: (919)220 -4680 Location Description: VARIOUS SECONDARY ROUTES IN DURHAM AND PERSON COUNTIES Contractor Name: WHITEHURST PAVING CO INC Contract Amount: $0.00 Cost Overrun /Underrun: 0% Work Began: Letting Date: 06/14/2017 Original Completion Date: 07/01/2018 Revised Completion Date: Latest Payment Thru: Scheduled Progress: 0% Latest Payment Date: Actual Progress: 0% Contract Number: DE00216 Route: - Division: 5 County: Durham TIP Number: W- 5601GD, W- 5601GG, W -5601 HX W -5601 HY Length: 0 miles Federal Aid Number: HSIP- 1361(010) NCDOT Contact: Troy B. Brooks, PE NCDOT Contact No: (919)220 -4680 Location Description: SR 1361 (VICKERS AVE) AT LAKEWOOD AVENUE IN DURHAM COUNTY Contractor Name: BRENTWOOD DISPLAY SERVICES INC. Contract Amount: $0.00 Cost Overrun /Underrun: 0% Work Began: 07/05/2017 Letting Date: 05/24/2017 Original Completion Date: 12/05/2017 Revised Completion Date: Latest Payment Thru: Scheduled Progress: 0% Latest Payment Date: Actual Progress: 0% Contract Number: DE00229 Route: SR -1637 Division: 5 County: Durham TIP Number: Length: 0 miles Federal Aid Number: 15005.1032011 NCDOT Contact: Troy B. Brooks, PE NCDOT Contact No: (919)220 -4680 Location Description: REDWOOD ROAD OVER FALLS LAKE Contractor Name: NORTH STATE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC Contract Amount: $410,868.44 Cost Overrun /Underrun: -1.32% Work Began: 09/05/2017 Letting Date: 08/10/2017 Original Completion Date: 10/23/2017 Revised Completion Date: Latest Payment Thru: 09/30/2017 Scheduled Progress: 48.7% Latest Payment Date: Actual Progress: 46.64% 121 https:H apps. ncdot. gov/ traffictravel /progloc /ProgLocSearch.aspx N U c o N c O ? N Q 2- O N 0 O 0) C N E N -6 L% U O -U rn U N � Y � N N C O O O 0 O C LO !? w EO u) N 0 ( N N R O O O Y U) CC C U _0 U N 0 L .o > U m U 2 -U L DN E -6 2 O C (6 N O -U L N C OU C 0 (D D U N C m L U) Q U) w 0 E o ` � O C 0 Q J D Q 0 C 0, > (D N E 0 w U) U) U N .0 Q >_ 0 w Q !? tq W > CD O O LO K3 CD O O O 2 CD O O N 0) CD O O V M CD O O O LU CD O O 0) 0) 0 � N W O O O O (h O O O V O O O LD V O O O LD (U O O O LD V O O O O O O O O d) O O O r O O O O LD O O O LD I- O O O O O O O O O O O O O LD N O O O O O O O O W I- U M (n K3 (n K3 LD (n (U (n M .0 (n V M (n LD cl) M O I- u> 0) U u> ID O (O O (O O W O N W O O Q J Q Z z o a H W W Z C) -U 0 J U) z w Q Q J z Q W V W W LL < O Q W Z w z 0 W (n O 0 Q w z U) W W Q W Z => w H W � W H W !? I 0 O �= U m W~ W H W (n Q Q m W Q Y Z Y J W Q H H W W w Q O n U) p W Q O z Q 0 W m E w W W z (n Q (� (n () = W .0 X w �ww Q W > QwZ W �C� N �� O �H rm m O ZO n QDZ �U) �.0 Q �U) wm = wwp O H (n w Q ~(n 0 Z .o j= O� n W W O Quo Z LU N Y O W W rZ N W V z l�, o Y W H j Q Q W O W O O .0z O w� U) �� W O _ U) wwC� a = w J dw 0 ,� �wcnLO �� O�� <�d 00 w O O� w C� zZ LO (� w w m�� U) U) z�w —Q> �0 -w L0 U) �� �� Ow �D D JD zQw w a Q �w Q> w Ocnw— U)LU a J�� I Q Q D w> �Q Oz U)0 — U) C) J oww LOZZ =O °ww (nom HQ C�� O~ w �Q O w n ~j > �J Q O 0 so w 0 o z Q Q_0 H Q � WO w J Q D Q 0p Q z Q W 0 w z LL a Q J 0 J Q Q0 w m o O Q 0 w H Q W a O W H Q Q ZQ N a) 0 w Q m m U) Z o Q Q O(V Q D O D J�O aQO OC) z O Lu �0 W W �� w LU > Q� W V j > QOO(n DQZ 0z N CA W w W LU w>(n LU w 0 > Q J J� LL m D= <wz W— �= �chz n O O J O Q OQ �0w W z Q oY 0 o N w n �z w paa w O w ~ >z w 0 n J >w a U) nw J w D u) W w wwz H OZ Q W Q �U) rn °) w Q w> Q�0> Z 0(Q W LU Q W O Z o� Z OQw O o.` 00 W (� H W w >Qw w W O W Q J H QC) W J > W O Z U) oU) Q >Q �Z �H (n ~ W (n W p H W H y ZQQZ Q Z (n chw� w O O Z �� } z ow Lf,QZ 0 0 ZQp O w -=o — —Z> Q Q p (�wZ N p Q > W W� H www Q Q Hw J Q W W Q O Jw J (n Q W W Q mzQZ Q ww�� Q W mJ �wQ Q (~j W W =� m Q (� W Qw W N Q w W 0 >0J H J Q0 U) ONQ U a� J O Q H D W H W W Cn H W Z m (� O W U> W CO > W > Q U> W> (n U w 5 H Q w Q N N N W (� H H Q Q Q> U) �_ O z m — Q (n Q Q O co tl = Q ll� W W= �_ J m Z Y N N z w W a W? W (n (n w Q 0 != a ~ J W co w w QZ W O Z rn Q= �_ W W d 0 w LL Cl� Q w w � (n CD w a w (n w> w w w w w O� w w O a n w n W O a w O Qw O w O z 0 w 0 w O Qw D QHQ U) U) Q U) C) Q -0�� U) n� wU -mow C) P- w ��m n new zQw �NC) (nwQ (new J N � U � ^ d U U a a a s m a a a a a a 0 a a a a a a a a o o 0 0 0 a LU o a a a N ) 0N J J U a) J N N O p 0 O O CL O 1-- ° O O O d O O O w O O O O 0 C C 0 C Q C C C Q Q Q o N >> 0 N 0 w 0 w N 0 � U W N 0 W 0 �? Z Z Z O z O z O? z Q o Q > Q > Q : o > Q O z C O m? w Q > Q > Q O z O z O z >I 0 Z � v _ O = LU w 0 0 Y = W LQ N CC 0) _ 'T V L0(, a � O V m v N m 3 L0 � O � co0 CL O O coo N N O � N (7 v O v I- v V) d O L0 U W Lj Lj L0 CL m Lj — v j 07 Lj m m W C� o N W F W W W W D) �j3 6) �j3 O O N N \ \ N (O r �j3 W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O J N E Q .1) a) oc) Q N Q N Q w D o Q Q N £ — O O 0 p E Q U U o) - m m D -6 0 OU O N E U U C N U C N (D U) Q d U O U U O U tq W > O CD O r K O CD O O O O CD O O O O CD O N O CD O n O CD O O O O CD O O O i O O N O M V M O N co CR N W O O O co .0 O O O O O O O O LO N O O O O LO O O O O LO O O O 0) CO O O O CO O O O O LO O O O O O O O O .0 0) O O O LO O O O O V O O O O LO U I- LO LO Ln LO Ef-J N K3 N K3 N CD- N O .0 I- r .0 0) N LO Cl) Ef-J K3 I- CIA K3 �U u+J o rn O O CD O CD O W O V O N LO O N CO O r LU > W 0 �0O W QZ H COZLLI p p w0 U) Q Q wZ DDp mow— H Z N 0 w WI �pZ �QCD LLollw LLollw Z Z p Q I - O Q QD d H 0 Q W F- DO p W W 0— U) J 0 Z 0) Z �- } Q O O w o< Q O w U J W O m n X > w U) z U) >? w H w Q > z z O w 0 w O Q Y� p Z V �_ �� U) �� w Q L�Ow W m J O U) J Z p- Q O Oww W �� Ow Ow OU) Q LQ U) d' j Z a d' W O Q U Z �O w Y w Q z 0� LL J Z Q U) Q Q pU) pU) �w LUZ 0� J Q 0z � Y � Z �� W I-- U) LLU W.Y �OQ Y 0 W O (� n WZ �O Z >0 Owa} W w .0 Q w.0 Q wco LLld W pQ O - J Z zw LL Z p 00 LL � w W w 0 W O W W YU) �' O -i H - W W <U) W H"p W W >� Z W >� j W QJ QQ U) (n U) W W H W W W Q W I (nom W W Q p W (n p Z O z W W 0 Q Caw �-� XLOQ W I� 0 DQ ~� I-- Jp W Jp W ZZ O Q I LU j Z Z D z � H W J 0 (� Z Q Z W= J Q p Q D m W (n W (n W O I~ U) W m W Q j O O O W W � W J � W J C W Z W z 0- LU JZ 0 OZ �ZD ZoU)(D 0E; HQ co Lu p WQ Y W �W �» CD _ > > _ p > aQ LO Yp mw Y0 mw W C) �co Q> LU �Q z0 Q~ O ~� z�Z (n (nOZ c��0— (� W pZ Q _ �(� dpQU) �Za - -w _jm m- -im m- �' W O W C O � w p O Q w OJ o LOw Q ~ p �w J 0 Q d0g� p> w p > w 0 m0 w D o w Q �0z W w 0 O O w OOQ - �Q - �Q Z w �LL a-. W O W W W �a W 0 n n z Q > Dz J W Q >�QX m W I W mz W w O p W cn� D W 0' 1-- O W E w�~ W O J ?� g I g� = O� W Q V I-- cje Cn z Cn Q p I d = J > V H> O z, z Q (D Q I O LO > 0 W I W V Z Q O~ O~ W = W W fq d Z 00w Z J OJ D Q w0 W D0 W D D0 LO (n W O W 0 LO W p J cn> J >- ww d W> w� 1 Z n0 O W 0Q� Z I 00w r D n0 f- ,0 W °� >> C) W OI W W pH 0m z�cn DQZLL mm W 0 U DO ��p z0 W DU) DU) °p U O IL Q Q H Q Q Q Q Q H H Q m m J J W J_ J J J J J N W W W W W W W W W W W U C3) i- C3) i- W J 0) i- J J 0) i- 0 0 J O IL J J Op tf J J s p p p p p C 0 r r s m m s F Z ZN Z Z Z Z ZNN .N O O ZN O 'N 'N O N N J O Z O Z o W O Z O Z O Z O Z 0 Z m W o W O Z wo W m p m p m W g LO LO O Z W I CO Cl) O O LO O CIA CY c0 P- Cl) V Q ON m ON N CO N LD I� Ln r Ln r Ln r Ln Ln N CO Ln Ln N � Cl) LOO V- I- 0 I- ) a. ? m m m m m m U) W W O O O O O O O O O N O N N N N N N N N N N F 0) CO W O V (O \ M M (O W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O J Q T cu O N to LB -0 N N U C) U CY) .� > O M > > C s C Lr- .2 N O >; Q CB -0 °D a) C: LB C: C O cu CB N c LB c cc O Q � U E -0 CU -a a) O �U c o.°_ 3 CU 0) C-% .N U r � C a) O O LB O rn cu N .� U a) (B rn cu (B 0) cv U� N N Q E W L = st -0 CO CL E '0 �,� �° cu a a CO C 3 = a= a=3 10 0 z z z 000 W 000 O W 0 CD CD CD CD CD LL! U O� °O °O aOO °O °O °O °O °O O 0 Ln N O O O M O LO fO � N r- r- co qT qT 04 EA EA EA EA EA EA EA W 0 a O O O CL cc 0 N N CD N N CD N CD N O 6 CL U LL LL Li fB 2-1 fB 2-1 N CO CD O 2 � O N O O O V r— N_ N N (0 �' (D r cu cu C O T CO \ � N O 0 cu W i C fB cn .. O to C U .-. 7� a) C N N y^ N U) C I► O O C (D ,� _ � a) LB O O r fB E L . . Q U U N > (D fB N "L'' N (n LU1_�� 1_ O� a) CU c O N D i�> O O O 0)— fB O fB C-) N N O 0 J LL 0 C-) O U Q �C+ C L N\ N U 0 7 N co O N 0 O -0 N L — a) �J CO N o ai � °U ; °���Y U V a i (D aa)) i L ai U m � cn J CU � V J O L n L >LL � U a r 0 a- _ D � aL CO a O v N 0-0 O T W O r " C 00 = N CO 0) +C O i C y � 0) c cu O O = a) C O L C z wU C: — O 0 N cu > r_ O — cB _ O O fB a) �' 7 j O Q' L (n (n Q. 0 c N U� L Q �' U (D U m U cu N0 L.1_ I� cn c cu �W � 70 L— cu a � N " C- o �o O N � to C aD N E 0 rn N � O '� cB N .. o aD 0 E E a) o cu �° 0 > N U C ai fB � L L � °� �_ 0 C a) 0� > � 'L rt+ O > L� 0 o U L � ° i 7 c.) C Y 0 CO O-- Z— �' � C 7 OL (D i M ~ CL w 0 C � O Q rt+ Q rt+ E 0� a� rt+ y--i 0 No 0, a) U a) t N 0' � Q � � U O - O O � � � J c 0 N .0 O ��/-� `� O �+/-� Z ��/-� fB W cn -_ cn O T =_ C E .0 7 Y-+ CO Q> a) O LL N C N O N 0 O (n U 7 O C) O L U a) .mF E L T f� - Q O � �� 0) 0 0) � T ' L cn VJ CL 7 V N Q O O N L E fccB �_ O C wN! t wr U m T T V ��/� to LB T /y�� c� c� T— U T G to W G oL G = ��/� U ) cu V T M N LO r— U) M O m > qT qT M IY1 T T ,. y T T T T T T T CL m ce) o �i cYi o r U) rn c� r �i cYi r r �i CYi F- co � ��qT 0) (D '-tMP- P- -4 (o(o(o ---tco co co r— T X 0 0 LO LO LO 04 ';T 00 M M M 00 M M M LO O ' 00 00 ' M Lo T N N LO N N N LO N N N Q-' � U) Nt Nt U) N LO LO LO LO LO LO LO cu k & 7 2 m/: cn CU m ƒ f k of D % a) k y� y$ /f .f -) = o cm U) cu 2 5 cu _ (D (D CU a) =5 c 0 2: c o S 7 c® n® E c> :/ o D t U) 2 D/ S 2 m E 2 ® _ % ƒ 7 % 2 5 S 2¥ 2 2 e 2 7 s §' ¢ ¢ cu ® = c ¢ % \ C ¢ > o (D f G § G § § o > G § / > 0) t c LLI [ (D ( _ _ x � [ (D B (D - _ CL [ � _ 3 e � E \\ cu = a E\ f � � J ° � � E � CD L6 � 7 CD \ R � r- 2 2 � uj § . E D \ \ \ \ C ƒ / k / U / @ 2 0 3 3 3 U 2 ~ / CN Q / ¥ / 6 / Z Q LL, ƒ7 / � \I cn k / f ® � k : 0) Q f= § ® y 0 m ® f $$ @ U s� §—� ±_ =3 CD O e J [� ®��m k/ CD % ( — / 2 .Q 7 ±E/ o � 2c2 $/ c 2 E k \ f / ± LLI @ _ 2 $ � E _ x % " a cn 0) CD / e s o% /@ ' / ƒ Q) 3 q % 5 -0 \ % O � ± = q 2 � % f = c @ o $_$ c _ G��® � s q= m� a a._ = o ƒ Go — ' f % : � / J # / § \ — u n ® 2 § (D 3 \ m (D % o _ \ 0ƒ 0 ® ± _ ± E 1 � o a a) \ c o- §_cm c % //a) G / Q 0ƒ f //0/ § //: /5 Q 2 2 E 0 CL 0 / 5 2 - cl / G > f / o ± k @ \ o e� 0 f o/ o u> §§ -0= � CD - %� t E 5® (D k B U± U k\ I$ ± q o # U) m / \ / / @@ & / \ n o q=& ¥ 6 ¥ 6 6 0 = f % / % r % r % % $ \ a O p +� m L � O C Q L u O m L r_ H p {- yp O v E 0 i U Q 0 r "r .O .O � a U � Z Q 60 bN I� III i2 O� 7 � C O � C d E i O) va rn N � d O O t O a` cn rn OI Co y O N d of t M O Cn O C N �I O Co JacO N O Co O I- O O Co O O Co O O V O� X� W X� M W CO U? O W N M O I- m O I- Xi m V M Co Co V V OJ O I- Co O V I- In O O M In W Co Co O W O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O Co W O N O O X? O � O O O O M U? O O O CO N V O V CO O CO W O Co O II- V Co I� V cR � N Co 64 N Cl) Co Co Co V Co Co I- Co I� I� I� I� I� I� I� � W W W I� O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N LO O O M O M O O o 0 N Co o o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O N N O N O O O N O N N m CO m m Co N N Co X) V V V LO V CO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CO O O O O O O O N O CO V N M Co LO V CO O O O O O O O m O O V C LQ OLQ O N o E M U Q � Cl) d d C w W O N 0 O N N O O N N O O M O M O N O Cl) M � O CO O M O O V O O) M M O M m O M M V W 'Cl: CO Cli O O N W O N N O W OO V M � O M OJ O) Cl) CO W O1 0) W M CO O C\ � 61) cR � � E./) 64 � Cl) Co � Co � a w 0 Y Ldp Ldp Ldp Ldp Ldp Ldp LLi W d N LLI d N d N d N d N d N d N d C L d L L L L L L U7 C U7 U7 U7 U7 U7 U7 •y N E. 0 Y U Y U Y U Y U Y U Y U Y U Y Q U U z Z Z O J J J J U °� (n (n U U O U Ir w Y w U E _ = O z Q z = QZ Z z O 0 °� C�7 CO d D 02 `o m m Z Q wZ Q O UO Q V U U Z J— Z Z J Z W W J U` J LL J O J g g Co O Qz O 0 —� 0 Ir O Q Q W O Q Q Q J J U Q U Hd U QJ LL U) U w Z Z CO QJZ 0 Co Cr >- g 0 U) w CU O U H (n U) U) z0 zo ww Z 5-UW Uzo w Wm U) Oz Oz_ Q�p aYW °�� WO LL pp OM LO U) Cr QU �2Q OOZ I� U p p z OU �Cr 0 0 UU mm �Z �Z 0� Cr0 cnm� W�Uz zZ 0 Co T Q m Q ~ U W U N w W m W T- 0 O Q o 0z LLB} LLB} W W JJ °o== LLzLL 0- W *i O Oz Oz U= �� z U U .0 ZO Z0m Z0m N= p W U��N Z0 W'z 20 N WOO W U O w U O W O i> W O M O O Q 0 Z O W p W U �pU �pU C)z O U��� �U�� �O U C wO W wIr W w W' W LQLZ m� LQLU�� JZ0C) Qm < J< Z J O Z J O Z p p Z� U O Q Q H Q W p aQQ a —Q a — Q UQ �p cnO0� ��Jz �W U W _j of W mod' W mod' W O x W W'Z� UO W W Ud' W Ir QO Tf C70 Ir C70 af Ir wQ d'LLQLo ZUIr U _0 � d L O � O O aE v �� z a C) lai p LLl p LLl p LLl p LLl p LLl p LLl p LLl p LLl p L L L L L L L L L O (D O (D O (D O (D O (D O (D O (D O (D O Y L se Y E. E.se Y. Y Y Y U Y U Y U Y U Y U Y U Y U Y U Y U O Z W_ - � C7 z ~ C7 z 0 z � z J J Za z Ir z w w U �U Z0 o Y U U 0 0 Z J H H Q z J � � JU ~O w 00 W 2 2 U Z J O H d W a U z Z Z U U a Q Q Z U O 0 00 Z o p LLJ LO~ �� Q Y O H Z_ Q� < U v� Qp >>00 O J Z d' U, d' W - W d' Q > w J cr Cr �v z0 U� Q �� ?QC7 00 0 J 0� ZO~ W wU WZQ Z W p� Q I�w Y � >z _� > QW �� �w aMi 0� zW� Ow OD O Q O — z_ O_ p� W af 0— z0 ZU *(D HZU W J *LO Q� w� wv U wM w0Q °� woo U z p p CO Cr 0 p O p z p 0 W Cr M Of W' U r J Co J CO U) J d CO Z W W W U O CO Z O LLJ Z Ir LL af W p O Q Z Y Q W U Q O LLi Q Q Q O Z Co O� d J W J p 2 p p J W d N = J W W OUpQ- apwaQ�ZQaW�Q0U� CL WW W WZ DZ Wwd' WO— QO WOf UJZ WD Wd'd' cnIr Q 00Ir `-U Ir I JOf Of QQQ Tf p af UC7 LL - J_ O LO O 3: � Cl) E) ++ m N U U Cl) U LO U N U O U U U LO CU O CU O O U Cl) m O N N Cl) LO CO W M M M N Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 7 04 04 U z U U U U p p p p p p p p p p p p p p AIR I c 3 a o > C O CM 0 f/1 > ), X600 9 0 0 C O C M 0 C O U Q N O �w ~a � OO N c j O r O 0 C -O O U N d Y N E N OO N > -O -_NLO M N O � — Q U> U C)CO� -o O UQ O M.� C E m o 0� a O �.� O Q w0' Q Oa o a C E Q Q O > > > M M / C C C > °O C Q a U C > o U > M U o In CJ o o (r > a� r U (6 U C_ (6 T 0 Q >C > N 9 U` U T N U 0 LO r L > E 0 d 0> Q 9 E C C E C S C f/) O` U) LL O 0 U) LO N M > y0 M C O U O ,L.., C) W C C) U N O ZU U 0 OC~ M m O w m a'QaQ O ii M M C QC>MQ(nO n .0 5 M C C W m O LL E w Y w O O U o y '- O f/1 U `0 T Y > LU E _T _T O o Q> °U-o O > O O M U) LL Cr n 0 LL H U) Q° Q M U C> T > > Q E D O N N M W In W LL r L 0 C C N 0 0 9 m (n (n M M> m d d Q 0` d 0 Y> p Q Ln >0 E v 'z O O O EO -o�-O 2 N 9 C M a '0 oLnL Lrj V M o M O O pN M> V a L C r > U) U) C y 0 Q N D a d � d U a C 0 d > 0 >> C LT Z p Q d d t/1 > d d y d 0 m C a 0 0 (n U O Q O H in Y in C_ F Y ) ) n OM [] a a d a 0 0 a Q O Q O . o a -O a-oU 0 d D O Q D 0 0 m m 0 O cow L O O a to 0 � C gR r m 0 0 O m m m m m 0 O E � � U E E E E E J O L L L C L L L L L> L > W a a M 0 a to O S E to E to E to E to o O a W m Q a o M LLI � O Q U C C Cie 0 > 0 O O a C C O - -0 W > - M a 9 M> C f/1 O L 7 R Q C M Q> C O 0 ? C S C C O S >> C Q Q C C > C C 0 O a Vl O a E > O E> O- O 0- f/) 0 E CO f/) - a > -0 .0 U f/) M a .0 f/) a .0 U U f/) T M a- .0 E f/) M O C a > O) L f/) a C > () E` Q 0 C aO o)0 a C� C a� C a C C _O aU) C» C -O� C U) > o O O T� 0 .0 > T M T M T T T > -0 C M T E >> M T > U> >> a Q Q >O a U U O C .0 T C 0 a-• C C > > U) E C C > C C > C C > > > C X C > > 9 Qa C > O Q O 0�'- U '- Ma C 0 D O Ma C Ma C Maaa C C C Ma C > (C6a C (D >> aU (n M5 a�.E UU a� a� a��� ate. md' a� a Q Z Q �O 000 1L11 W 0 OO O w U 000 O O O O Q O U v O O O 00 d o o 0 0 0 0 000 O O O O O O O O O O O O U O (h O M Efl LO N O co V V Efl Efl O 0 O LO M LO Efl Efl (D LO O LO V N N Efl 69 Efl LO r r 69 LO r r 69 LO r r 69 0 O W 69 LO O) M 69 O O 69 J o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W E 0 0 0 � O U — — b — — o> > ti ii ii ii LL Q Z a R 0 W O) CO NY 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 r 0 R N \ N N N N N N J Q to o Q 0 LL O s T O y0 0 U n M O L C M M D a m Q R M a 3 M N -O M^ -Q a O> m r. I m C w N ^ > U) C L o d' 0 0 C m Cr >> C 9> 0 0 O > O 0 Or o 0 �� m E C L o5a > �n w M C t/1 (� d' > C> C N (nY yY 0 '�-' M O M U O C C J L -_ O— O O) (n M -0 >> 0 O Z ` _0 CD Z w O M >= t/`1 0 .0 0 0 0 C L O Q Y E C 0 N L p CO f/1 0> p 9 Ll E Q W> » (6 > C- M 't 0 p > O U 0 Y z 'O U C C >>> > m m O C 0 > M 0 O C a a U> 0 N> O M co i r W C Q 0 11 .O O C (D '0 N a M C _ to . 'O 0 .0 U MILL LL in a w .w o _ x N N C C a M -° a` U U C C Q a) Mp (6 (n ) - M >i O d C C 9 a) H T a O O O C) E o o m o> o L w E O E M.D O �:. C U O C C '0 9 O O T O O C OE > Q 9 T T a) a2E o a) a) 01- C C O C O N N> (6 C to O (D U) U U M M Q M C O -O 2 in in a) Q 3: O O N N T 0 .O CO CO C U) U) a L T M S O O O � boa oa >y (n E O O L O O Q O° M o Q D D D d R _ 0 W $ o " 0. J LUa ° W n a W 0 a ? m o C) a v O O O Q C C O U a O a) C N C C A y to a 0 D Qa .0 C) o E m E Q Q O a -Ot/1 C T O .. - OU Q O U Q .-- O to C . Q a) C M C to O C a) O to a Z N C N Q m O a> N p C a >M C E C L C C C W a`� a� �° U)m C) a`�° Q O LLB 0 0 0 °O a °O °O_ °O °O_ U o z O O ° Ln J y � U = W ° O �y Eo 0 N 0 0 N 0 N O o •L CL 0 u U U L o LL LL o n E �_ �_ o N d E Q O U J U) U) rn rn 1 i(D 0 Z O a) C O (6 T a M M 3: CO W r O O C CD = N E 75 -2 O w a ,L.. U �_ toy or o o O .c fi -o m C & to V to C C C O O O m 0 a) i� ^ a M O Cr CO O (O O E °� E O E a o a E `o m °o (r ] L a) C Q� M z L U �_ Q O m M O O LL -O -O Q CO U! O ° x to °- L)at> U o ` > ODS M`(D N p C0 M O f/) C (6 a) O U CON a) a) C Q Q M L Ol O 9 to a O o to [) `F C M M M E � a)U_ ) O CC a) n C W w a) O - d � U _ U) C N OU Ua > . E O O O MaL ._ (6 O O C C W O - L m H i O C O O C Cr O E Ln C - co = O E �i - Q C�Y O 0 C O O a N J M OJ O L 0 a m M M O E O >� C C MN n E a) O ( M 5 o 0 �ln fn M E E 15 E M -E (D ' > o U) m� m _ LL mNN �i O N M D M M M M 'a ~ rn— — — ; T C6 rncoco T Lo Lo In M- M- �_� o �� oriri Lo Lo �co � 0) .0 co v v v v v v v v v v a� E _ a� Q E O cn cn a� cn co a� cn ? E U U E := := Co v '= c U o LO 0 :� :� c E- -5 Cn \° o O C1 Co Co p_ +0-' Co -0 C Co M 7 N p N CL Q CM CT V) 0 co O N N Co p Q N Co o Y O= L O p Q' W) co Co V) c 0 c L o o 0) 0) Co 0) Co Cal 0) cu Co U Co C L.L '� Co '� Co a Co -0 -0 Z"a C �� W �cuC F� ��� �n�� FL a CD o O ° O c LO CD 0 U U o W O v N O o O °O o °O ° o co O L CD O °O O W cl CD W N 00 G� G� I-- O r- N LO O co r- QCf) Cf) Cf) Cf) Cf) Cf) Cf) Cf) Cf) Cf) O W 4) w Q m E Q O O N N O 0 N 0 N O O Z O Ci O N O LLLL LPL in I Li I LL 10 10 LL 1 CL '' '' CO co co CD rn O N o N co N 1 N LO r- - 00 L I- �J /� CN N M Q) co LL O co LO r- W N a E > C co U) cn N O O L Y (V Co L L D C N O D W m `� Co 0 CD o 0 CC C3 co 0 Co z s r- O CD O a .� U N c cu _ �Q �''-0 CU U �F Q' U U U Co +,`-O O N r. �� O Co U N 0 p Co M O .� 0 J p a O z a C1 CM - U Q' Y Off_ N O rn I► O N p 0 O cu 00 UN �Q/'� C cu U V) y co U o >cu �--� � CU ai W L O Y L > N to > N N vi CA M Co N aI N (n cu �• - O O L L O Co " O Co N L > T i y-- (n 4 a M C w O 00 CL C O O Co N C E _ N= N a [A E Cfl r- � . p p N N N N N a� Q N co 0 c) U - �� N - Co N O CC L o L Co Q' a � O O O "_ O cU.. a��.� Q N E� Q Co E�?.. E O "_ v U Co �'n .L i C •C U O N C 6 -a ,� O Y 0 p L= m CO X Co "0 .� N �. O 0 O 0 U N N U p U w cu cu cu (n N C Co m O cu N N Co yL+ L (n N 7 L N L O O L " Co _ �zm U2.� c0 c )U _ c� zQ' co /X VJ N N 00 O co 17 7 m - - - m - - - M LL d C'7 C. � O - CV Cl? D N M D N M N M M� M� OM OEM ��� OI-: 1,: r-� rnNt Nt Nt OOO N"t 1'. O N N�[-- - 0 0 Nt LO LO L 0 0 0 - 0 0 LO 00 N LO Cfl L ' O co ' O O co co I- �---t LO O O ' r- r- r U Nt Nt N ' 00 00 00 U� 14- 14- M O O ' Nt Nt m� m Nt W co W co co ' Lo L U Nt Nt N U Nt Nt N co co M�1 O L Co U 0 -00- O a0 - O "O N - E O O a) O O O U N "= O U Q a) O ~ ch 3 cn o Co '� a Co Mn a Co .N Co �_ L Q E v ) U C ) 0) c Co y Co N N Co O a) O � rn ' Q O a) U C � O C3 U O C3 a) c = Co U Cn 7 Q C C C N C o a: 0) co co 4-- a .a F E Fn °� a CS co O C) co a? a) 0) co a? a) 0) co o > 0) co E �2 a) a) a) L a) co C Co Co � Q Q U U �► E C7 E C7 c a) Co 7 c c 0) o Zo O a c 0 C O C O O O W d� U FL :3 d: dC � U U U a Z � ° +� O O 0 ch O O O ° O ° o O O O W o o co o 00 0 0 � o L O oo M o O M O L O Q 1 1K) 61} EA 1 Ef} 61} 61} 1 61} Cc O O W Q Q E O N m m N m O N O N O O O O LL LL LL LL LL 1 CL N *' O co co m r— L a) 4� Q N co — E 1 N C O O O O E /vim J � co co _ \ _ \ � O V co co r- r- (n N m a) a) Co U a) a) a) M a) 70 O c c Co � Co NO U) U) o � M �N Q O W co O C U U a1 E O Co a) Q a) U a) U E O cu N O U O U U m O i Co a "' C N 0 L L M 7 0 Co L Im a) 0 p) CU o 0 o m N E cn L -O — O 'i O O� a� E z >, Cn cn o X. v O N Z W 2- Q cow O Um U O .. 4-- U) a O 0 a) O N� N� >, 0 N — cu N a) L U) c c O y co Co 70 Co a) L O Q "_ 0 O O Q O N Co N O Z U Co E a) .� L Co �- U CL O a) _ O O �_ 4-- U Y L J O U O Co a) O cn .--� Co O Co � CU O O > 0 L > 0 Co � C a) (n E C 0 0 N U O O Co Q O L Q U E Q U - ° O a) - > +� :� r— Co U cn L L C-) LL 4-- U .� r- r. O E t3 t� O Co C Z y , O Co O a0 Co p = +- o N Co O- Urn U U o O L •� E o E L �. f cu Q' a) L Cn Q' L L a) Y N Co a) — co N Y O d r- cu O O a) a) C 7 O 0) cn -0 N co U o I.S Co s Co U cn m m U cn ul U O m d C) M N N M M N M N M N M ~ M M Cf) M M O M M M O N L L r- I-- I-- Lo 0 0 co co M Lo N N co M M Lo N N L? co 0o 0o Nt O N LO LO LO LO LO LO Nt Nt Nt Nt M�1 i C O V +� v L � ^O ca CL N (Q r m L F O O v a+ � a L 0 w+ E 0 L V Q L 0 � C i U a 0 V �v \NP NOi1y�6 �b N I� III 10 c O � C d E i O O V Cl) N O y O U a a) W M rn rn � r N 7 r L y 0) O O O Cl) O O O V N O r O O O O O W O O O O L C) O d (n O LO W L 00 N O 00 W r- O O V O I- O LO V Cl) c y O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O E d e O O cl O O O �2 �2 O O m (A N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N i M �5 �5 M izz i:z � O d mLr) r- r- W V 00 N LO Cl) W 00 LO V 00 0) �+ M O O r- r- O O O O r- r- r- r- r- r- r- O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O ! ml V O N LO I� V V O co O) co V V V O W W M 00 V CO O W V m OOOO O O O co co CO O X) CO - co M N V CO N V V O LO N O) U� co 00 O) xj O O N OM C O LQ COO COO W I- co V COO N W M V W LO - LO C) O O M ( V M W CO r-: C D O W CO m O LO O E LO W O) O O LO LO 'CT 00 ICT C4 E./) 00 m r- E./) L d c e Y e W LLI LLI c- 0- c- LLI LLI LLI 0- LLI LLI 0- 0- 0- aa� aa� c- a) aa� w c- a) aa�aa� aa�aa� ui aa�aa� 0- a) 0- a) 0- a) L L L L L a L L L L L �- d m O m O m O m O m O m O m O m O m O nj m O m O m O m O m O .a E w E w E w E w E w E w E w E w E w C E w E w E ' w E w E w d L L L L O L L L L L 0 L L L L L O: Y U Y U Y U Y U Y U Y U Y U Y U Y U J Y U Y U Y U Y U Y U U Z Z W p Z U U Z U J U U U U O w Q U U U Y U 0 z_x Z_x U Z_x z_x Ir 0 J (n0 z z U Z_x cr d x U H U H U H U H Z U a W U Z J ¢ U E �cr �� �o �o x z �0s ¢ a z cr m O z¢ z¢ z z¢ z¢ 0 Z ZO 00 z a D QQ Z a JZ JZ O JZ JZ Z a O 0Z_ aJ (n a JZ Lp m �0 �0 U �0 Pi > 0 U UU m W ¢ ¢ D Z 0 U) ¢U)z QU)z QU)z Q(nZ ¢ Z UFO UFO �Z UFO UFO } 0 w LL W C) ww } IL 0 JO Ug� o ¢ 0- 0- z 0 0- 0- J J v U cr w = LL ¢ x 0 Q o— U af (n0? U ¢moo LL a 0 w 0 c C) U w 00 Uz �g Cl) 202 202 00 Ir cr U) co 0 o Q z(n? 0 no�0 -x Oaf �C, H¢ H¢ �¢ a}o ¢ ¢ O_Z n� O oaf s LLJ Ir LO ZZ afZQ afZQ LO LO �cr - T 00 QZ �D0 O WSW ?�°W2 N(n UU u)�� u) -1 °�� ��(n U04 0Q~ IL w0�0 po0 Co n�c°o c�nQ0 +0)O U(h W W °°0z �0z 2� V �w U) U) ¢ 0- W 2 QaNO adz w ��� W UQ 2afm V 0 �"t ow UZ COcr- z mow w jz(�nx woo Ir U) CO 0 -0 o�0) u) rnU co co Zaf Z�ci w0 zOUE U) 00 w�UZ ��OU UQU 0 a — — LL rn0�0) wLO O aM co li co LL OO CO U) (n (n m W 0' z Z UwOD ca- O � W N �Z� �(n (na �� �� a' CO ma'N (n aZ0- Z 0w x D O Z�� ~ Q i OQ x O x O ¢z wLOa OaN - oo�Z J O <oQ W wO_ a0 WOM �0 ZOO 08 QfN LLJ C) Z� W (n W (n Um a0(n �(n 0) (� Z ~OZ < O W 200 cr (na ~com �Oa' Z�O� (nom af Cl) W UO Z ~(n Z ~ (n W20 ZU0 U) �� ¢ O¢ZDO a ¢Ucr z¢ZU ¢x Cr LO aUw ¢�OO ¢(n LL z C U Z W W W W W W W a� W a w a a N a J= W a � J LO Z Z 00 Q a W W Lo w y � 0 L M LL o QQC7 gOJ gOJ ONx 2OW a(n� a �w m Jgz W H� W H� SOU W H� ��� � 2 Q H 0 �Q W Na'g Z:) 0- a V 0 a N D00) C'4 =� > (n > U) � Q > (n U) (n J Z N U Z � a Q (n Q (n ¢ ~ CO O � Q � (n U) p W Ja' QQN QQN Ua'0 QQO W (O a' W O W W a0 i� >a'NJ W 2 (n�� (nJZ W LL Of W a'a' J a'QO a W O a W O Z(nU a W a'�(n a' ?Ua'U = ZD -� >(nN¢ Of C) ¢¢¢ a'00 co co a L ¢ a O Cl) O LO (o LO a Cl) 00 M m L � HIZ — — D — U U ++ C) L V V O N M N V O O N O O N N N Cl) Cl) Cl) LO LO LO r- W +�- Cl) co co Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) M M V O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 7 0 O O O U U U U U U U U U U U U Z U U U U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SG Item 9.b. Orange Unified Transportation Board 2018 Calendar (Regular meeting dates subject to change by Chair in consultation with Staff) DATE TIME LOCATION January 17, 2017 6:30 P.M. Conference Room 004, Lower Level Orange West Campus 131 W. Margaret Lane, Hillsborough February 21, 2017 6:30 P.M. Conference Room 004, Lower Level Orange West Campus 131 W. Margaret Lane, Hillsborough March 21, 2017 6:30 P.M. Conference Room 004, Lower Level Orange West Campus 131 W. Margaret Lane, Hillsborough April 18, 2017 6:30 P.M. Conference Room 004, Lower Level Orange West Campus 131 W. Margaret Lane, Hillsborough Nay 16, 2017 6:30 P.M. Conference Room 004, Lower Level Orange West Campus 131 W. Margaret Lane, Hillsborough .tune 20, 2017 6:30 P.M. Conference Room 004, Lower Level Orange West Campus 131 W. Margaret Lane, Hillsborough July 18, 2017 6:30 P.M. Board vacation - no meeting August 15, 2017 6:30 P.M. Conference Room 004, Lower Level Orange West Campus 131 W. Margaret Lane, Hillsborough September 19, 2017 6:30 P.M. Conference Room 004, Lower Level Orange West Campus 131 W. Margaret Lane, Hillsborough October 17, 2017 6:30 P.M. Conference Room 004, Lower Level Orange West Campus 131 W. Margaret Lane, Hillsborough November 21, 2017 6:30 P.M. Conference Room 004, Lower Level Orange West Campus 131 W. Margaret Lane, Hillsborough December 19, 2017 6:30 P.M. Conference Room 004, Lower Level Orange West Campus 131 W. Margaret Lane, Hillsborough [date OUTBoard /Transit Advisory Services (TAS) meeting dates 133