HomeMy WebLinkAboutCFE agenda 021317AGENDA
Commission for the Environment
February 13, 2017
7:30 p.m.
Solid Waste Management Administration Building
1207 Eubanks Road, Chapel Hill
Time Item Title
7:30 I. Call to Order
7:32 II. Additions or Changes to Agenda
7:35 III. Approval of Minutes — December 12, 2016
The CFE will consider approval of the draft minutes from the last meeting.
(Attachment 1)
7:40 IV. CFE New Member Introductions and Welcome
New members will be introduced and given an opportunity to introduce
themselves.
7:55 V. Continuing Action Items from Previous Meeting(s)
The CFE will review action items remaining from previous meeting(s) and
consider next steps. (Attachment 2)
8:05 VI. Upcoming Outreach Opportunities
The CFE will discuss options for participating in upcoming community events.
8:20 VII. CFE Committee Break -out Sessions
The standing committees will meet to review and consider updating their
priorities and next steps. (Attachment 3)
9:00 VIII. Updates and Information Items
Staff and /or CFE members will provide updates on the following items:
➢ Monitoring and Evaluation of County's Goals from January BOCC retreat
(Attachment 4)
➢ Sustainability and Environmental Responsibility Goal Update (Attachment 5)
➢ Annual Work Plan Discussion at BOCC Work Session, 7:00 March 28tH
Whitted Building
➢ 2017 Nature of Orange Photography contest (Attachment 6)
➢ Eno River Watershed Hydrilla Public Information Open House (Attachment
7)
➢ DEAPR Earth Evening event, April 28th, 2017 (Attachment 8)
➢ Triangle Land Conservancy's Brumley Forest Preserve Grand Opening, April
22nd, 2017
➢ Price of Solar Panels (Attachment 9)
➢ Any other new information from CFE members and staff
9:15 IX. Adjournment
Next meeting; March 13, Richard Whined Building, Hillsborough
CFE Meeting Ground Rules (Adopted 9/12/11)
1. Keep to agenda topic under discussion
2. Share relevant information
3. One person speaks at a time after recognition by the Chair
4. Everyone can participate in discussion /no one person should dominate discussion
5. Strive to reach consensus before voting
Activities the CFE expects to carry out in 2017:
• Continue to write news articles on environmental issues of importance to Orange
County, including climate change, energy conservation, and other important topics
• Continue to explore ways to improve the County's ability to foster local sustainable
energy production and energy efficiency strategies, including making Orange County an
even better place for appropriately -sited solar energy generation, including developing
incentives for increasing energy efficiency in new construction
• Recommend ways to reduce the County's "carbon footprint" and implement the County's
Environmental Responsibility Goal (BOCC Priority #10)
• Continue to help with public outreach and management efforts related to hydrilla in the
Eno River
• Participate in a County effort to identify and preserve important landscape corridors that
connect significant natural areas and open space (BOCC Priority #1)
• Co- sponsor the annual DEAPR photography contest (The Nature of Orange)
• Help plan for and participate in County's annual Earth Evening event
Concerns or emerging issues the CFE has identified for 2017:
• The CFE will continue to advocate for an expansion of the County's commercial food waste
pickup and composting services to reduce food waste in the solid waste stream
• The CFE remains interested in developing incentives for increasing energy efficiency in new
construction
• The CFE will continue to learn more about environmental justice matters and incorporate
relevant information and considerations in the next State of the Environment report (2020)
and its other activities
• The CFE will continue to follow the Solid Waste Advisory Group's discussions of how to
improve the handling and disposal of Orange County's solid waste, and will advocate for
better long -term solutions
• The CFE will continue to advocate for increased efforts to gather information related to water
resources in Orange County and to increase public awareness and understanding of water
supply sources, related concerns, and what steps can be undertaken to maintain or improve
the quantity and quality of Orange County water supply resources
• The CFE will continue to address, as appropriate, the critical environmental issues for Orange
County as enumerated on page 3 of the 2014 State of the Environment report, which include
potential adverse effects from a) invasive, non - native, plant and animal species; b) reductions
in State -led collection of water resources data; c) potential drilling for natural gas in the Deep
River basin; d) urban sprawl; and CFE support for e) the responsible deployment of clean and
appropriately -sited renewable energy and reductions in energy use to help fight climate
change
Orange County
Commission for the Environment
DRAFT Meeting Summary
December 12, 2016
Orange County Solid Waste Administration Building, Chapel Hill
PRESENT: Lynne Gronback (Vice Chair), May Becker, Peter Cada, Loren Hintz, Bill Kaiser,
Bill Newby, Jeanette O'Connor, Rebecca Ray, Sheila Thomas -Ambat
ABSENT: Lydia Wegman
STAFF: Brendan Bouma, Tom Davis, Rich Shaw
GUESTS: Paul Cough
I. Call to Order — Gronback called the meeting to order at 7:35 pm.
11. Additions or Changes to Agenda — None
111. Minutes — Gronback asked for comments on the November 14 meeting summary. Hintz
motioned approval as written; seconded by Kaiser. Approved unanimously.
IV. CFE Annual Report and Work Plan 2016 -17 — Shaw referred CFE members to the
CFE's annual report and work plan, which was discussed at the November meeting. He
pointed out the changes that were made in November and reminded CFE members they
had already approved this document. Shaw said he would submit the approved
document to the Clerk to the board of county commissioners.
V. Planning for Climate Change — O'Connor provided an overview of the Town of
Carrboro's community climate action plan, which she noted is being considered for
implementation by the Carrboro Board of Aldermen. O'Connor pointed out the Board
had been scheduled to take action on the plan in November, but this item was delayed.
O'Connor said she is a member of the Carrboro Energy and Climate Action Task Force,
which developed this plan with assistance from Randy Dodd, environmental planner with
the Town of Carrboro. The purpose of the plan is to educate the town residents on ways
they can help reduce Carrboro's greenhouse gas emissions in ten categories, including
transportation, energy consumption, ecosystem management, and food consumption.
CFE members commented and asked questions about various aspects of the plan.
O'Connor pointed out that many of the objectives will be difficult to achieve, but the task
force decided not to shy away from ambitious targets. She noted two overarching
recommendations from the task force is for Carrboro to create a sustainability
coordinator position and to establish a stormwater utility.
O'Connor reported CFE members can access the climate action plan via the Town of
Carrboro's website, noting it is #2 of the download options found at the following page:
Mips: / /carrboro.legistar.com LegislationDetail.aspx ?III= 2882400 &GUID= 9581AE32- SEES- 437A -82AD-
F8CF2I FE4022 &Qptions= &Search
CFE members thanked O'Connor for sharing that information and asked they she
apprise them of any further actions by the board of aldermen.
VI. CFE News Articles — The CFE considered a draft news article by Bill Kaiser on the
subject of climate change and a draft follow -up article, also on climate change. Kaiser
pointed out he had made several edits to the first article (Part 1) since the November
meeting and considers it ready for CFE approval. CFE members offered some final
thoughts on the article, including a recommendation by Becker that there be a more
comprehensive description of the natural causes of climate change. Kaiser pointed out
the difficulty in covering the topic in just 600 words, but he would consider adding that
additional information if Becker would provide the suggested language. She agreed to
send a new sentence to Kaiser for an addition to the article. The consensus of the CFE
was to approve the article with minor changes by members by Kaiser.
Kaiser said his second article was still in draft form and he asked for further comments
by CFE members and staff so he could provide a revised draft for consideration at the
January meeting.
VI I. Election of Officers — CFE members conducted the annual election of a Chair and
Vice -Chair for the upcoming year. Lynn Gronback was elected Chair, and Bill Kaiser
was elected Vice Chair for 2017. Both votes were unanimous.
VIII. Updates and Information Items — Information on the following subjects was provided in
the meeting materials: a) CFE meeting calendar for 2017, b) CFE comments on UDO
changes for flexible minor subdivisions, c) 2016 climate change indicators in the US, d)
COP22 Marrakech Action Proclamation, e) NC Industrial Hemp Commission, f) and an
article describing the environmental meaning of President Trump.
IV. Adjournment — Gronback adjourned the meeting at 9:00 pm.
Summary by Rich Shaw, DEAPR Staff
2
Attachment 2
Orange County
Commission for the Environment
Remaining Action Items from Previous CFE Meetin2(s)
February 13, 2017 Agenda
1. Carrboro Climate Change Action Plan:
Any update on this at this time?
2. CFE Newspaper Articles:
Two newspaper articles concerned with climate change were finalized last week and
submitted to The News of Orange and The Chapel Hill News for their consideration.
Are there additional issues and interest for further newspaper articles or not?
3. Other:
Are there any other items from previous meetings that need to be revisited at this time?
Orange County Commission for the Environment
CFE Committee Priorities
(updated May 2016)
Air and Energy Resources Committee
(May Becker, Tom Eisenhart, Bill Newby)
1. GHG Emissions Inventory — Consider whether it is feasible and worthwhile to conduct a
comprehensive update of the County 2005 greenhouse gas emissions inventory.
2. Green Building — Help the County develop an incentive program for green construction.
3. Climate Change — Educate county residents about climate change, alternative energy sources
and efficiency, and steps to reduce their (and County government's) carbon footprint.
4. Energy Efficiency — Partner with Piedmont Electric Membership Corp and /or Duke Energy
to take advantage of USDA program for low- interest loans for energy efficient upgrades for
its members /owners.
Water Resources Committee
(Peter Cada, Rebecca Ray, Sheila Thomas - Ambat, Bill Kaiser)
1. Stream Buffers — Conduct a literature review of the science in support of maintaining
vegetative buffers to protect water quality, aquatic habitat, and biodiversity.
2. Hydrilla Treatments — Continue to educate the public about hydrilla and other invasive species
of concern; continue to monitor chemical treatments to assure they are not harmful to rivers.
3. Surface and Ground Water Quality — Increase the collection of data for surface and ground
water quality; increase public education so it might lead to more funding for data collection.
4. Water Supply — Continue to educate county residents about our water supply and what steps
can be taken to improve /maintain quality and quantity of future water supplies into the future.
Land Resources Committee
(Loren Hintz, Jeanette O'Connor, Lydia Wegman, David Welch, Lynne Gronback)
1. Comprehensive Conservation Plan — Collaborate on the development of a comprehensive
conservation plan for Orange County for Legacy program and others to protect natural areas
and wildlife habitat. Consider ways to ensure conservation land is distributed equitably
throughout the county so that everyone has reasonable access to enjoy these areas.
2. Native Plant Habitats - Renew collaboration with NC Botanical Garden and others to identify
significant roadside habitat for native plants; then ask NCDOT and other utilities to eliminate
the use of herbicides to manage vegetation in those special roadside habitats.
3. Native Landscaping - Educate homeowners and businesses on reasons to choose a diversity of
regionally native species for landscaping and other ways to promote biodiversity.
Monitoring and Evaluation of County's Goals
Summary from BOCC Retreat, January 2017
Reaffirms the six goals the BOCC established in 2016 and establishes policy priorities
for each of these goals.
Goal 1: Ensure a community network of basic human services and infrastructure
that maintains, protects, and promotes the well -being of all county residents.
Priorities (number of votes): Affordable housing (5)
Family Success Alliance (3)
Community Centers (3)
Goal 2: Promote an interactive and engaging system of governance that reflects
community values.
Priorities (number of votes): Outreach /Internet Access (3)
Residents access to county (2)
Intergovernmental funding formula (2)
Goal 3: Implement planning and economic development policies which create a
balanced, dynamic local economy, and which promote diversity, sustainable
growth, and enhanced revenue while embracing community values.
Priorities (number of votes): Partnerships (2)
Economic development (2)
Sub - economic development (2)
Goal 4: Invest in quality County facilities, a diverse work force, and technology to
achieve a high performing County government.
Priorities (number of votes): Housing living wage for Orange County staff (4)
Support the Manager's internal strategic initiatives to
ensure quality implementation of all key priorities (3)
Goal 5: Create, preserve, and protect a natural environment that includes clean
water, clean air, wildlife, important natural lands, and sustainable energy for
present and future generations.
Priorities (number of votes): Include local agriculture as key to unmentioned "open
space" (6)
Develop plan for residents and farmers and
businesses to prepare for and adjust to effects of
climate change (1)
Goal 6: Ensure a high quality of life and lifelong learning that champions
diversity, education at all levels, libraries, parks, recreation, and animal welfare.
Priorities (number of votes): Education: At -risk children (5)
Connect students to community colleges (4)
Move toward a joint effort with towns on parks and
trail development (2)
SJFuirN *w
��IVVVW�UIUluO � ��,,
mmmmmmo �
CUV IIUdn �� E Vufnlm�mrlrlm�u O'U � �� ^ �pllpo�, l muVUU m,
....
January 24, 2017
To: Board of Orange County Commissioners
From: Brennan Bouma, Sustainability Coordinator, Asset Management Services
Craig Benedict, Director, Planning and Inspections
Jim Northrup, Director, Information Technologies
Blair Pollock, Planner, Solid Waste Management
David Stancil, Director, Department of Environment, Agriculture, Parks and Recreation
Jeff Thompson, Director, Asset Management Services
Gayle Wilson, Director, Solid Waste Management
RE: Orange County Sustainability and Environmental Responsibility Goal Update
BACKGROUND
Twelve years ago in December of 2005, the County adopted Environmental Responsibility Goal (ERG) for Orange
County, and it remains a guiding document lowering the County's negative environmental impacts. The ERG was
drafted by the Department of Environment, Agriculture, Parks and Recreation ( "DEAPR ") with the input of
several departments.
Following from this adopted goal, in 2011 staff from Asset Management Services ( "AMS ") presented a
comprehensive report on the County's historical use of energy, water, and fuel. Since then, a broader group of
County departments have reported a more complete update on sustainability activities aligned with the
Environmental Responsibility Goal in October 2012, April 2014, and June of 2015. Reporting departments are
listed here:
• Asset Management Services (AMS)
• Information Technologies (IT)
• Planning and Inspections
• Department of Environment, Agriculture, Parks and Recreation (DEAPR)
• Solid Waste Management
UPDATE ON KEY SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS AND ACTIVITIES
This report provides the latest updates on several ERG performance goals since our last report in June of 2015,
including utilities reduction performance data for fiscal years 2015 and 2016, as well as current and proposed
initiatives across several departments.
This report only covers a sample of the broad array of measurable sustainability activities and indicators that are
relevant to the work of County departments and the lives of County residents. At the end of the report is a chart
comparing several new sustainability tracking and reporting frameworks under consideration which may be
used in the future to analyze and report on the state of sustainability in Orange County.
P.O. Box 8181 * 131 West Margaret Lane, 3rd Floor * Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278
Telephone: 919 245 -2625
Fax: 919 - 644 -3001
E -mail: jethompson @orangecountync.gov
County Utilities Reduction Tracking
County Utilities Reduction: Goal vs. Trends
• Energy
• The County has fallen short of our 20% energy reduction goal for FY15 achieving only a 14.8%
reduction when compared to baseline year FY10.
■ A subset of major facilities showed usage increases during this time likely due to failing
infrastructure that has since been replaced.
• Still, the cumulative effect of these reductions since 2010 is a savings of over $778,000.
• Water
• The County exceeded our reduction goals achieving a 14.1% reduction in FY15, though the
savings have varied from year to year.
• The cumulative effect of these reductions since 2010 is a savings of $67,000.
• Fuel
• The County is not on track with our fuel reduction goals, though in recent years it has shown
improvement. FY15 shows an mpg increase of 7.9 %, showing a 1.1% improvement from the
previous year.
• The cumulative effect of the increase in fuel usage since 2010 is a cost of $117, 000 since FY10.
• While the higher- than - standard average age of the County fleet is a contributing factor, the
more significant cause of this increased fuel usage has been increased service levels being
delivered by some of the County's least efficient vehicles.
■ Our ambulances have some of the lowest miles per gallon figures of any vehicle in our
fleet and they've been responding to significant increases in the volume of emergency
calls.
• Fuel- Saving Technology Grant Projects: To address this problem directly, County staff has
collaborated on 2 grant projects piloting innovative propane bi -fuel systems and idle- reduction
2
15%
10%
_ ,,rrrrr
w
0%
1111J,
Energy Reduction Goal
a
�uow°
M
0
_5�
° °p ° uuuuuu ° °°
m, % Energy Reduction Actual
o
0
% Water Reduction Goal
-10
%
i ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° °
E
°° ° ° °°°w°
r0--r % Water Reduction Actual
-15/
% Fuel MPG Increase Goal
bb
-
20 %w,,,,
����rF % Fuel MPG Increase Actual
_25
Current Update
o
30/
FY 10 FY 11
FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 FY 17
-35%
• Energy
• The County has fallen short of our 20% energy reduction goal for FY15 achieving only a 14.8%
reduction when compared to baseline year FY10.
■ A subset of major facilities showed usage increases during this time likely due to failing
infrastructure that has since been replaced.
• Still, the cumulative effect of these reductions since 2010 is a savings of over $778,000.
• Water
• The County exceeded our reduction goals achieving a 14.1% reduction in FY15, though the
savings have varied from year to year.
• The cumulative effect of these reductions since 2010 is a savings of $67,000.
• Fuel
• The County is not on track with our fuel reduction goals, though in recent years it has shown
improvement. FY15 shows an mpg increase of 7.9 %, showing a 1.1% improvement from the
previous year.
• The cumulative effect of the increase in fuel usage since 2010 is a cost of $117, 000 since FY10.
• While the higher- than - standard average age of the County fleet is a contributing factor, the
more significant cause of this increased fuel usage has been increased service levels being
delivered by some of the County's least efficient vehicles.
■ Our ambulances have some of the lowest miles per gallon figures of any vehicle in our
fleet and they've been responding to significant increases in the volume of emergency
calls.
• Fuel- Saving Technology Grant Projects: To address this problem directly, County staff has
collaborated on 2 grant projects piloting innovative propane bi -fuel systems and idle- reduction
2
battery backup units, increasing the resilience and decreasing the emissions of 7 ambulances, 10
Sheriff's vehicles and 5 Environmental Health Inspector vehicles.
■ On -site refueling tank and pump installed and owned by Blossman for our convenience.
In the first 6 months of each program, ambulance idling was cut in half and propane was
used approximately 50% of miles travelled. Each year these projects save approximately
65 tons of CO2 and other emissions.
Throughout these updates, staff has reported on our aggressive 5 -year utility reduction plan mirroring the
State's utility reduction goals. We are now in the final performance year of the utilities reduction plan. A final
report will be presented next year showing the final 2 years of performance data, and reporting on new possible
reduction targets.
Key County Sustainability Activities and Indicators by Department
Asset Management Services (AMS, highlights by division):
• Administration - Paperless Work Order System: In collaboration with the Information Technologies
Department and TMA Systems, AMS administrative staff is instituting a paperless work order system to
increase efficiency, decrease storage space requirements, facilitate communication, and reduce paper
waste.
• Capital Projects - Single Occupancy Restrooms: In response to Board of Orange County Commissioners'
(BOCC) request to create safe and equitable restroom spaces for County staff and residents, the Capital
Projects team has inventoried all County restrooms and is in the process of designing, bidding, and value
engineering to ensure there are single occupancy restrooms in all County facilities. Restrooms are
scheduled for installation in the Spring of 2017.
• Custodial Services - Sealing Restroom Floors: Sealed County restroom floors with a durable no -wax
coating to better protect public health and dramatically decrease cleaning time.
• Facilities Maintenance - In -House Construction Pilot: During a 12 -month period Facilities Maintenance
Staff took on a series of electrical, plumbing, and construction projects in addition to their maintenance
duties on a pilot basis. This in -house work leveraged existing labor and new skills acquired by the
maintenance team, avoiding over $48,300 in costs that would have been charged by outside vendors.
AMS staff is exploring ways to continue doing this work in -house to maximize savings.
• Fleet Maintenance - Efficiency Analysis: Worked with a team of national fleet experts from CST Fleet
Services to analyze the quality and efficiency of the County fleet and fleet maintenance divisions. A plan
to implement their findings is underway and will lead to a reduction in overall fleet size, greater
utilization rates per vehicle, and a more sustainable vehicle procurement procedure.
• Sustainability Program:
o Telework: Created a new administrative Telework Policy, application process, and training
program as part of a larger commuter benefits program in partnership with Human Resources
and in consultation with Information Technologies, Risk Management, and the County
Attorney's Office. The final program was approved by the County Manager in November 2016.
o Comprehensive Accessibility Self- assessment: Completed a comprehensive accessibility
assessment of County facilities and sidewalks in partnership with Housing, Human Rights and
Community Development and disability support groups. All 5 miles of sidewalks on County
facilities were assessed for accessibility and connectivity in partnership with the Planning and
Inspections department. Currently implementing plan to address all obstacles identified.
o EV Charging Station Grant: The County has been awarded a $10,000 grant from Duke Energy to
install 2 additional electric vehicle charging plugs at County facilities in 2017. Staff envisions this
investment will supplement the well -used EV chargers at the Seymour Center in Chapel Hill. This
charging capacity will be added to the current network of 16 EV chargers that county maintains
to further support the adoption of clean- driving electric vehicles in Orange County.
o Shared Vehicle System: Developed a low -cost method to reserve, track, and maintain a new
shared County vehicle pool, leveraging existing technology.
o Sustainability Internships: Successfully recruited and managed the work of three UNC interns,
adding 320 free staff hours and 520 low -cost contract hours to amplify the work of the Orange
County Sustainability Program and provide green job training for young professionals.
o Community Geothermal: As of June 2016, 6 buildings are connected to geothermal systems
leading to 30 -50% reduction in heating and cooling energy use and costs: Jail (2016), Old
Courthouse (2016), Court Street Annex (2016), District Attorney's Office (2014), Link Center
(2012), and Justice Center (2009). The County has saved more than $180,000 putting us on
track for a 3 -5 year payback.
o Energy Bank: The Energy Bank is a revolving loan fund created by the Board of Orange County
Commissioners in 2012. It has allowed the County to make investments in energy- saving
technologies that have a good return on investment. The propane vehicle pilot project was
carried out thanks to a 20% match from this fund. Even with historically low gasoline prices, the
payback after the first 9 months of running the systems is over $1,600 and each vehicle has an
increased range of 100 miles before refueling.
o Orange County Sustainability Program —Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Grant:
Applying to the Triangle J Council of Governments for a TDM Grant in partnership with Orange
Public Transit to reduce traffic congestion and improve local air quality. If successful the grant
would support 50% of the salary, travel, and materials costs for a new position to administer
and market the newly created Commuter Benefits Program which includes the County telework
program, carpool ride - matching service, a GoPerks incentive program, and the upcoming
subsidized bus pass program.
o Established the County's Sustainability website: Visit to learn more:
http: / /www.oranecountync.ov /departments /asset management services (amsj /sustainabilit
y. h
Department of Environment, Agriculture, Parks, and Recreation:
• Commission for the Environment (CFE) Support: Supported the enthusiastic civic participation of
County residents in providing guidance and information to the BOCC on Orange County environmental
issues in collaboration with the Sustainability Program. DEAPR and the CFE participated in a substantial
review and comment on a proposed amendment to the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) that will
allow for Flexible Minor Subdivisions. The CFE also has an ongoing effort to write and publish a series of
educational op -ed articles on various critical environmental issues in local papers.
• Eno River Hydrilla Management Task Force: Completed two year pilot study to evaluate management
of invasive aquatic plant Hydrilla Verticillata in a section of the Eno River.
• Surface water quality monitoring: Supported the efforts of the Upper Neuse River Basin Association to
conduct regular water quality testing as part of the Path Forward project to determine quantities and
sources of nutrients entering Falls Lake. Additional surface water quality monitoring was completed by
the Triangle Area Water Supply Monitoring Project: a long -term project monitoring the quality of
drinking water reservoirs throughout the Triangle region.
• Increased inspection and maintenance of stormwater control measures: Reviewed and improved
inspection and maintenance protocols for stormwater control measures at County -owned sites based on
newest best practices. These steps will increase treatment of stormwater runoff from these sites.
• Least -toxic pesticide review: AMS and DEAPR collaborated on development of an inventory of
pesticides used on County -owned properties and reviewed their toxicity.
Information Technologies:
• County Surplus Computer Re -use Program: Annually diverts hundreds of surplus county computers for
re -use by an Orange County student training program in partnership with the Chapel Hill Carrboro City
Schools system and Orange County Sustainability Program, under the guidance of Solid Waste
Management.
• Electronic Content Management Projects: Increasing resilience and efficiency of accessing County data,
while decreasing the need to maintain on -site paper -based archives by establishing electronic content
management projects that fit the needs of several County departments, e.g. the Northwoods System for
the Department of Social Services, the Patagonia Health System for the Health Department, Paper Vision
for back - scanning historical records and MUNIS Enterprise Content Management System.
• Energy efficient computer fleet: Continued replacement of older less- efficient machines with Energy
Star or equivalent desktop computers and laptops for County staff.
• Mobile workforce support: Increased implementation of remote support functions of the Help Desk has
allowed for rapid response without the need for technicians or staff to travel. Taken together with the
support of laptops and other mobile devices, the IT department has facilitated high productivity levels
for all County staff, including those in the field or those working under the new Telework Policy.
• Virtualization: Continued virtualization efforts have allowed the County to reduce the number of servers
and other critical infrastructure it maintains. This practice has the additional benefit of increasing the
efficient use of storage space in County buildings.
Planning and Inspections:
SolSmart: Planning and Inspections staff provided critical technical guidance in the completion of
Orange County's application to the SolSmart program, in collaboration with the Sustainability Program.
SolSmart is a national recognition and technical support program to help governments lower the costs
for businesses and residents to build solar energy systems. The Sustainability Program joined
sustainability staff from Chapel Hill and Carrboro in a successful application for 6 months of additional
no -cost, full -time, "SolSmart" technical assistance in 2017. Beyond working with the Advisor to review
our solar - relevant codes and practices, we also plan respond to the BOCC petition on solar -ready
construction and to help identify the best Orange County facility rooftops for future solar power
investments. Each community is working with their Planning and Inspections staff to achieve high -level
designation in the 2017 SolSmart Communities program.
Bike Share Program: Orange County Transportation Planning staff is currently exploring the possibility of
funding a small bike share system within the Town of Hillsborough. Working in conjunction with Chapel
Hill, Carrboro, and UNC- Chapel Hill, the proposed pilot implementation for a bike share program would
include all of the communities in question. In Hillsborough, the system would consist of three or four
stations with a total of 15 bikes. Preliminary analysis indicates that a station in West Hillsborough near
destinations on Nash Street, a station at the Gateway Center, a station on Churton Street, and a station
near the County Courthouse and Eno Farmer's Market could form the basis for a system in Hillsborough.
Solid Waste Management:
• Waste Reduction Performance: For FY 15 -16 Orange Co. achieved an overall 62% waste reduction rate,
meaning that the waste landfilled per capita was 0.52 tons per person last year compared to 1.36
tons /capita per person in base year 1991. This surpassed for the third year in a row, our goal set in 1997
of 61% reduction. Orange County's performance on this metric this year was the best in NC though it
was 2% less than the prior two year highs of 64% waste reduction.
• Providing universal residential curbside recycling service: All 41,500 homes throughout urban and rural
Orange County are now eligible for curbside recycling. In the past year, the remaining homes in the rural
area were added to the curbside program. Use of roll carts has improved collection efficiency such that
the County has had to add only one truck and driver to the existing fleet to offer universal recycling
service to all 22,000 rural residences.
Recycling Services: The Orange County Solid Waste Management Department continues to provide
recycling collection to all County government buildings and facilities as well as those of Chapel Hill,
Carrboro, and Hillsborough. The 'government buildings program' is in reality a broad and expanding
effort that encompasses many elements of 'away from home' recycling including building, parks, park
and ride lots, downtown pedestrian containers now in all three Towns and convenience store gas islands
at about half the convenience stores throughout the County. A total of 209 tons was collected last fiscal
year at these locations.
Waste Audits: Staff is conducting waste audits of major local government buildings in all jurisdictions
that will evaluate the amount of recyclable material that is still being thrown away and will assess
options for improving the governments' internal waste reduction performance. Follow -up audits will
occur in Spring 2017.
• Waste Reduction Projects: Several waste reduction projects are underway including the Fork it Over'
program which began in April 2015. This program lends out washable metal utensils (up to 200 forks and
spoons, along with serving utensils) avoiding the disposal of an estimated 10,000 units in its first year.
Another program is the collection of compostable food scraps at Carrboro Farmers Market, which began
in July 2016 at the Saturday market. The County created an option for residents to drop off compostable
food scraps during market operations. Since the program began, over 800 people have deposited over 3
tons of compostable scraps averaging over seven pounds per user. This program is staffed by volunteers
managed by the County and is serviced weekly as part of commercial food waste collection program.
• Waste Wise Events Toolkit: Created a Waste Wise toolkit full of materials that will help County staff and
residents reduce the waste generated by events that serve food in collaboration with the Sustainability
Program. Ran two focus groups and incorporated feedback from County event organizers to improve the
program. Program to be fully rolled out in 2017.
NEW SUSTAINABILITY SCORECARD MODELS UNDER CONSIDERATION
The Sustainability Coordinator is exploring models for a new more complete sustainability scorecard
performance measurement and reporting framework in collaboration with DEAPR and in consultation with the
Health Department's Health Informatics Manager. Five models are compared in the following chart:
Retrospective
Clearinghouse
Dashboard +
Goals
Sustainability
Plan
Certification
Measure against
past performance
Measure and report,
let users ask their
own questions
Measure against an
identified ideal of
sustainability
Make a plan and
measure progress
towards completing
that plan
Sign onto a
recognized
standard, measure
progress towards
standard.
Current Orange County Essential practice, but
looks backward. Not
ERG - Sustainability Time
Reporting
integrated into larger
plan for future.
i„
Carrboro Climate Action
Plan
Cary Strategic Energy
Action Plan
FJA
Track as many relevant
and available indicators Time
as possible
Must agree with the
subset of indicators
Time
chosen: Does this make
us sustainable?
Must choose subset of
indicators to track:
Time
What makes us
sustainable?
Time;
Menu of actions and
Basic access =
indicators already
identified. Charlotte,
Free;
Membership =
Durham, Raleigh, Cary,
$500;
and Winston Salem are
Certification =
STAR members.
$3000
VA
The STAR Community Rating System appears to be promising model initially as its framework of indicators and
actions can be accessed and tested for free, and it is a model chosen by several neighboring local governments.
After consulting with the Durham Sustainability Manager about the nationwide indicators used by STAR, County
staff learned that those indicators vary in clarity and applicability on the local level. Additional analysis will be
done to determine the value of this sustainability rating system for Orange County.
SUMMARY
The Environmental Responsibility Goal and its associated objectives continue to direct the work of County staff
towards ever more sustainable operations and support programs for County residents. This work has been made
possible through the leadership of the Board of Orange County Commissioners as well as the collaboration, hard
work, and open minds of many County staff.
Thank you,
Brennan Bouma, AMS, 919 - 245 -2626
Craig Benedict, Planning, 919 - 245 -2592
Jim Northrup, IT, 919 - 245 -2276
Blair Pollock, Solid Waste, 919 - 968 -2788 x206
David Stancil, DEAPR, 919 - 245 -2522
Jeff Thompson, AMS, 919 - 245 -2658
Gayle Wilson, Solid Waste, 919 - 968 -2885 x106
Y
Q
LL a
O
HZLLZ
wI�0
�Z�H
�O�Q
a U
w z w
o w Q a
C
C
O
i
C
W
w
O
41
c
dl
c�
a
a�
dl
s
H
T O
V C a) v V >
V 0 t a)
u�o U
0 C y%i
L
O
L V1 yVj L a)
L ro j ro 0 0 >
> o L 3
D: N N •� N N L V O
06 � � aa) � � � ro
0 O 0 u a� O �.
ro 7 aL� LL
o .110 V Q
a ro N O v s w
N v ro ro
a� 0
i 3 s �° U L " T
3 e
7 ro v ro V
V Q ro -Vp ro ro w `�' 0
L L N ro N V
b0 W
Q S a ro U
L.
C
E.
l7
E
O
s
F
i
C
3
3
Q
�o
0
N
i
C o N L
r
O —
D O
a7 O
N
3 N
-
u�o
ro
E�
U
a)
C
O
Z,
d
r/�
L
> 0
O
W
�
U
D
3
W
o
bpo
ago
bA C
O
j
c p d
-p
^
o
d
0
°
U
L
N C O
w
C47
Z
Ln O
ro
ro"
L v
ao
s
N N s
V N
Z)
a
a7
N
Gl Z
>
V
m c
ro
0
3
ro
`
o
i
a) a) >`
0 0
N
'ro
d
0
O a; i
N
L
ro
L cli
,`gO+A1�
°M 2
a s w
C
s
E
�
v
O
L o
3
mc
Got
V L
a)
O
i
C o N L
O —
D O
3 N
-
c
LL D a O
a ro
U
a)
L p
p°
a L
L
O
U s
p
a)
a) ro a)
ao�s
U
bA C
O
j
c p d
-p
^
y N
d
0
°
_
U
w
3
ro"
L v
ao
O
s a7 p
a7
N
Gl Z
bA
Z
O ro
ro
ro
`
a) a) >`
0 0
CC:
Got
V L
a)
O
a)
x
U LL O ago
O
c O
3
±+
ro
y
0
M
O
N
O
s
Q
a7 V s
ro
L LL
O
n
O
v
"
a
a
E D
..
.. ,
ro > a
-ao N 0
ro
w
d=
bA
E
v
ro
a� a
s
Z
W=
O— ao
ao
a7
O .�
N 0 ro
ro
w
D—
O
M
'�
V O
U
E - � 'ro
0
N>-
'n
a�
p C
0-
fn
C O a)
ro
E
n Q
F
a0
r
s
O
N
U
�'
b�-.O
E
U
O
ro
s
" s L
s O
Z
U o0
S
ao
O O
as
N
°-L'
a
i O L-
°
N LL O
J
=
°= a0
a
o
�axi
—
��O
p
a
O O
—_
O
i a7 a
0 L L" a7 >
O a) > ro
Q
td
d 3 a
o Q
a
O .?
w
0
U O0 s ro
a 0 E
p
0 OTC
W
—
N
rn
T
Ln
r�
co
N
C
a)
E
c
O
L
C �
W p
O ro
L V
0 E
L -Q
o_ ro
O
0 N
fl. Y
T L
N � d
7 �
O
U �
C O
V
ro L
OQ
•
s
O 4)
O
a °1
C
O
N �
`O U
O
N
a)
s
"
0
O
E
E
O
U
N
C �
0
O �
a) �
w O
� L
ro •j
L
OW
•
V
C
7
O
U
O
a)
V
a)
d
N
C
7
O
U
a)
b-0
C
L
L
•
O o
V
O
i t
CD
Z
CD
s a
3
Q
C
O 0
C W
C
O
O J
C
O
2
�O
O
N
C
d
C
O
C
W
w O
O
41 4J
r
C �
N y
V
L.
o a�j OD
N
razz
O
N v t
U > 7
y ) O
V O
i
OQrn=
O
bfl
L V
ro �
v �
7
boa 0
O u b00
T L
LA z; N c (a�O.
N N s
O� u
s
O _
0 ° E
a s w
p L 0 V 0
O T 0 i O , r ✓�' � l �F N O � y
s � 0' V >, >
m ro o
O O a) .0 ✓ �i� .rrr% of " ro a) to O_ " C
'+' O 7 " s r r✓ ��r j c c K. i bA i �; 7 7
w ro U aLi /� ✓/ r o � a7 ro O O
E d p L %/ ,n 3 O O ro
0 w O 0 0 x N ' j l ° (d ro 0 S N 3 ro U
L L O_ a) / a o C d N ro C b.0
> x L O 0 3 bU Gl N ! j %rr `� `� N i O Ln .o 0 O
w C: co 0 O O / '- a) N — O C, L a+ i
ro N 3 ro- i
c a7 O bU
0 ro ro '- V Q C C O >
0- c: " ro a O_ Co 3 p z co bA O L O
0 boo ro N O a 'C Q a0+ bU V 0 4' V v ro
" C
L v O 0 v b0 S ro v C a) ro �, = L
L _
H a a H ro ro D- o ro 0 Q• • a 0 ro o 2 VII) a a. -D 3 Li C:
i
a
O
bA
V
C
c
3
O
V
bA
C
i
O
a
s
0
0
00
o
O
0
0
0
3
bU
s
u
°L'
E
o
T
s
�rl
°
L
U ro
0
s
V
o
o
C"
-
s c.
u,
= Y
w,E
E
a7
ro
o
d
W
ro
: ai
�_
O `tl t
%
0
O_
E
c
W
a- ro
aLi
O .-
3 O
O
ro
ro
3
=
0
0
aLi ,
s
O
s
X
p
3
3
`�
�"
i
a a7
ro ro a
E
o a7 C
ro
0
�
0 ro
.LIP
N
v
'2
0
s
O
=ro
aroi
4
+�' O aLi
0 0
O
E
ro
N V
0 - y,i O_
ago
d .-
0
L " w
0 x"
O_
0
p
a7
-C
'�
"
a7
>
O
s
"
Q W-
O
a7 ro
ro
o ro
i
bU "
V
a7
"
ro
V
O
0
Z
bp
i3
Co T
O
a)
D
N
N
N
v
bU
u
li 0
c ro
ro-0
N
`tl
a7
T
E E
E
t
Lba
N
0
0
O
vi
O
a)
�'
ro
"
td
V V
al
b4
s
bA 'ro
ro
yV
"
a)
N
a)
C
y
a, O
i
G .. 0
, V V
O L O
0
N ro
R
L
L
C:
Y
bU
C
a7
O_
ro"
N
0
L
m
O
Gl
N
o--
�, p ro
N
a7 �;
-O
N •�
fn
ro
0
'p
C
1"i,
N
L
d
L
N
r
L
LL 0
Q
b-0 ro a)
i
a)
yti m
-O E
0 .�
L
0
0
O
T
0
Q
Q
c
U
o C
i ro
V
O
ro
U
0
N
W
ro,
i O_ 0
o s O
""
D
N
L
0
L
w
O
:Q
-s
a7
a7
bU
a7
a7
'�,
ro
ro
o s O
V
s
z
.E s
bU
p
ro
L
ro
00
"
'L
a)
ro
L
= j
O N b-0
u N
O a) •�
bA
N O
O U
b-0
O
o
"
L
b-0
"
a)
O_
p
"
V
fn
L
ro
V
LL
L
=
C
�-! O_ " ro
O
LL w ro
t L
J " ma
i
6 "
p L 0 V 0
O T 0 i O , r ✓�' � l �F N O � y
s � 0' V >, >
m ro o
O O a) .0 ✓ �i� .rrr% of " ro a) to O_ " C
'+' O 7 " s r r✓ ��r j c c K. i bA i �; 7 7
w ro U aLi /� ✓/ r o � a7 ro O O
E d p L %/ ,n 3 O O ro
0 w O 0 0 x N ' j l ° (d ro 0 S N 3 ro U
L L O_ a) / a o C d N ro C b.0
> x L O 0 3 bU Gl N ! j %rr `� `� N i O Ln .o 0 O
w C: co 0 O O / '- a) N — O C, L a+ i
ro N 3 ro- i
c a7 O bU
0 ro ro '- V Q C C O >
0- c: " ro a O_ Co 3 p z co bA O L O
0 boo ro N O a 'C Q a0+ bU V 0 4' V v ro
" C
L v O 0 v b0 S ro v C a) ro �, = L
L _
H a a H ro ro D- o ro 0 Q• • a 0 ro o 2 VII) a a. -D 3 Li C:
i
a
O
bA
V
C
c
3
O
V
bA
C
i
O
a
s
Hydrilla in the Eno River Watershed
Public Information Open House
A Public Information Open House will be held on March 1, 2017 at 6:30 pm to allow
interested members of the public to learn more about the on -going project to manage the
invasive aquatic plant Hydrilla in the Eno River watershed. This meeting will be held at
the Cedar Grove Community Center at 5800 NC 86N approximately 8 miles north of
Hillsborough. Directions are available on -line at: http:// server2 .co.orange.nc.us /ParkLocator/
Hydrilla is a highly invasive aquatic weed native to Asia. It grows quickly and reproduces
easily. Hydrilla is a problem because it clogs water intakes, interferes with recreational
activities and alters natural habitats. Hydrilla is listed by regulatory agencies as a "noxious
aquatic weed ", making it illegal to transport, grow or sell hydrilla. Hydrilla has been found in
Lake Orange, West Fork Eno Reservoir, the Eno River and also in private ponds in the upper
Eno watershed. Without continued management, Hydrilla is very likely to continue to spread
within the Eno River watershed and possibly even into Falls Lake and beyond, negatively
impacting important natural resources and recreational activities.
Mr. Rob Emens, NCDEQ, DWR, Aquatic Weed Control Program rob. emens(cncdenr.ov
Dr. Rob Richardson, Professor of Crop and Soil Science, NCSU rob richardson(cDncsu.edu
2016 was the year solar panels finally became cheaper than fossil fuels. Just wait
for 2017
0 1
M, I el J, Corel U ( orc
MW
Energy
'M 16