HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 01-23-2018 8-e - Property Tax Refund Request – 107 Boulder Lane, Chapel HillORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: January 23, 2018
SUBJECT: Property Tax Refund
DEPARTMENT: Tax Administration
ATTACHMENT(S):
Memorandum
NC General Statute 105 -381
uest — 107 Boulder Lane. Ch
Action Agenda
Item No. 8 -e
Hill
INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dwane Brinson, Tax Administrator,
(919) 245 -2726
1
PURPOSE: To consider a refund request for the property owned by Ms. Doris Tippens at 107
Boulder Lane, Chapel Hill.
BACKGROUND: In 2016 it was discovered that the exterior measurements for 107 Boulder
Lane, Chapel Hill were recorded incorrectly many years ago. Upon the discovery, tax office
records were corrected for the 2017 tax year and forward. The Tax Administrator and County
Attorney view this as a clerical error, and advised the taxpayer that a refund of five years could
be recommended to the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC). Mr. Tom ODwyer, Power of
Attorney for Ms. Tippens, has requested that all affected years (dating back to the 2005
purchase) be refunded in addition to interest. The Tax Administrator and County Attorney have
expressed to Mr. ODwyer that such a request is not supported by State law.
On September 5, 2017, Mr. ODwyer addressed the BOCC and provided an analysis showing
the contended amount of revenue Ms. Tippens would lose as a result of processing the refund
for only five years. Staff believes this analysis may be flawed in that it assumes the increase in
value from 2008 to 2009 was the result of the square footage error. However, the value
increase was actually due to the 2009 revaluation as the square footage error existed many
years prior.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Staff has calculated a total recommended refund amount of $1,678.89
for the five year period.
SOCIAL JUSTICE IMPACT: There is no Orange County Social Justice Goal impact associated
with this item.
RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Board approve a statutorily -
supported refund for tax years 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016.
�i
ORANGE COUNTY TAX ADMINISTRATION
228 S CHURTON STREET, SUITE 200, PO BOX 8181
HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27278
Telephone (919) 245 -2725 Fax (919) 644 -3332
T. Dwane Brinson, Director
Memorandum
To: Orange County Board of Commissioners
Cc: Bonnie Hammersley, County Manager
John Roberts, County Attorney
From: Dwane Brinson, Tax Administrator
Date: January 5, 2018
Re: Property Tax Refund —107 Boulder Lane, Chapel Hill
On September 5, 2017 Mr. Tom ODwyer, Power of Attorney for Ms. Doris Tippens, addressed
the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC). Mr. ODwyer requested that the BOCC provide
full restitution by approving a refund of property taxes for tax years 2006 -2016. During this
period of time the property at 107 Boulder Lane, Chapel Hill was assessed with an inaccurate
square footage due to a transcription error of an exterior measurement. This memorandum
provides the BOCC with summary case details as well as a refund analysis.
Clerical Error
North Carolina General Statute 105 -381 provides that a refund may be issued for any of three
reasons: (1) a tax imposed through clerical error, (2) an illegal tax and (3) a tax levied for an
illegal purpose. Case notes supplement the statute and provide additional details as to what may
fall into each of the three categories. The property at 107 Boulder Lane had an exterior
measurement that appears to have been transcribed incorrectly: a wall length of 28 feet instead of
20 feet was recorded. This resulted in an inaccurate square footage calculation of 1,784 instead
of the 1,336 correct square footage calculation. Transcription errors qualify as a clerical error.
As such, a refund of up to five years may be approved.
3
A refund of greater than five years is not supported by State property tax law. Rather, case notes
of the statute go on to clarify by stating (summarized): The demand for return of taxes must be
made within the prescribed time after payment (5 years), and it was held that the statute applied
to all taxes, that the remedy provided was exclusive, and that a failure to make demand within
the time prescribed was fatal to the right to maintain an action to recover the taxes. The
requirement of making a demand within the prescribed time is mandatory.
Refund Analysis
For the statutorily- affected tax years of 2012 -2016, the tax assessment for 107 Boulder Lane
would have been $237,300 instead of $258,413 had the property record reflected the more
accurate 1,336 square feet instead of 1,784 square feet. Applying the corresponding tax rates for
each year and each jurisdiction, this results in a 5 -year refund amount of $1,678.89. Figure 1:
Tax Office Analysis below shows this illustration.
Figure 1: Tax Office Analysis
Doris Tippens's property tax Overcharge analysis for 107 Boulder Lane Schedule
Tax Year
Assessed Value
Corrected Value
Difference
Tax Rate
Difference
Refund Due
2016
$
258,413
$
23 7, 300
21,113
0.016104
21,113
340.00
2015
$
258,413
$
23 7, 300
$
21,113
0.016104
21,113
340.00
2014
340.40
2-.58,413
$
237,300
$
21,113
0.016104
$
340.00
2013
$
258,413
$
23 7, 300
$
21,113
0.015804
5
333.67
2012
$
258,413
$
23 7, 300
$
21,113
0.015404
$
325.22
$
325.22
2011
$
258,413
$
23 7, 300
$
5
1,678.89
Figure 2 below provides an expanded analysis showing the difference in billed amount for tax
years 2006 -2016, which includes all tax years the property has been owned by Ms. Doris
Tippens. The difference between the recommended refund of five years and the taxpayer's
request of full restituation is $1,755.58.
Figure 2: Tax Office Analysis - Expanded
❑orisTippens's prupertytax Overcharge analysis for 107 Boulder Lane Schedule
Tax Year
Assessed
Value
Corrected Value
Difference
Tax Rate
Refund Due
2015
258,413
2-37,300
$
21,113
4.015144
$
340.40
2015
$
2.58,413
$
237,300
$
21,113
0.016104
$
340.40
2014
258,413
$
23 7, 300
$
21,113
0.015104
$
340.00
2013
$
258,413
$
237,300
$
21,113
4.01 -5844
$
333.57
2012
$
258,413
$
237,300
$
21,113
0.015404
$
325.22
2011
$
258,413
$
23 7, 300
$
21,113
0.01.5404
$
325.22
2010
$
258,413
$
23 7, 300
$
21,113
0.015404
$
325.22
2009
$
258,413
$
2-37,300
21,113
0.015404
$
3 25.22
2008
$
191,041
$
175,743
15,29 ^9
0.01809
$
276.74
2007
$
191,041
$
175,743
$
15,29.8
0.016755
$
256.32
2005
$
191,041
$
175,743
$
15,298
0.015135
$
245.83
3,434.47
C!
The taxpayer analysis, as provided to the BOCC on September 5, 2017, provides different
numbers. It is assumed in said analysis that the increase from 2008 to 2009 was the result of the
clerical error. This is shown by the illustated correct value of $191,041 in 2008, and further
confirmed in conversation with Mr. ODwyer. However, the increase was due to the 2009
countywide revaluation as the clerical error existed many years prior.
Figure 3: Taxpayer Analysis
IDwisTippens's property tax Overcharge analysis for 107 Boulder Lane Schedule
Tax Year Status Tax Value
Charged
Approximate Overcharge'
3.% interest
S% interest
Orange County's 10% interest
2017 Correct 237,6CC.CC
3901.32
2016 Error 258,413.00
4346.93
732.00
756.15
790.55
869:62
2015 Error 258,413.00
4346.93
732.00
776.58
853.80
939.19
2014 Error 258,413.00
4342.73
687.80
751.58
866.43
953.07
2013 Error 258,413.00
4272.95
658.02
740.51
895.23
984.75
2612 Error 258,413.01)
4157.59
542.66
629.09
797.35
877.08
2011 Error 258,413.01)
4152.59
537.66
641.99
853.20
938.52
2010 Error 258,413.01)
4147.59
532.66
655.10
912.89
1,01)4.17
21)09 Error 258,413.00
4147.59
532.66
674.75
985.92
1,084.51
2909 Correct 191,041,00
3614.93
-c _a I's bused on 0%/ 3 %/ 8%/ 10%
4,955.46
5,625.87
6,955.37
7,650.91
Total amount Staff offered on 4/6/17
1,678.89
1,678.89
1,678.89
1,678.89
Even if it was 5 years maximum
3,352.48
3,654.01
4,203.37
4,623.71
Tax rates wouid need to be reconciled to each year by staff. Estimated }/- 196 variance
Conclusion
North Carolina law allows for a refund of up to five years in the result of a clerical error. The
transcription error on the property located at 107 Boulder Lane, Chapel Hill qualifies as a clerical
error. A refund of principal tax for only five years including tax years 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015
and 2016 can be recommended to the BOCC. The total recommended refund amount of
$1,678.89 can be found above in Figure 1: Tax Office Analysis.