HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 06-13-2006-10aORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: June 13, 2006
Action Agenda
Item No. 1 ba
SUBJECT: Justice Facilities Expansion Project Review and Park and Ride/Shuttle Service
Options
DEPARTMENT: Purchasing and Central PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) No
Services and Planning
ATTACHMENT(S):
Letter from Employee Relations
Consortium Regarding Park and Ride
Initiative
Letter from Courthouse Employees
Draft Parking Plan (under separate
cover)
INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pam .!ones, (919) 245-2652
Craig Benedict, (919) 245-2585
PURPOSE: To receive information regarding the status and endorse the committee generated
plans for the status of the .Jtastice Facilities Expansion Project; and consider options for the
park-and-ride/shuttle service to the downtown Hillsborough County campus,
BACKGROUND: Three planning groups have been involved in the design of the Justice
Facilities Expansion project, Carley Redfoot Zack has worked consistently with the Interior
Planning Committee, comprised of Judicial Officials who will occupy the space, The architect is
in the process of finalizing Haar plans with the Sheriff and with the Clerk of Court, Most
recently, the Exterior Planning Committee has completed its work on recommendations for the
exterior of the building. The recommended design will require a text amendment by the Town
of Hillsborough to allow far the height of the building, The Planning Board met on June 5, 2006
to discuss the text amendment. The project would then move forward far Historic District
Commission review. An update on the Planning Board discussions will be provided during the
June 13 meeting, The Historic District Commission has scheduled a special session to
specifically review the Courthouse project on June 21, 2006, The Architect will share the
project developed thus far with the County Commissioners during the June 13, 2006 meeting.
The Board will also be asked to consider park and ride options that are, in part, prompted by the
Courthouse expansion. The Planning Department has worked with County staff and others to
develop options for Park-and-Ride/Shuttle Service to the Downtown County Campus. There is
insufficient an-site and on-street parking to accommodate the current parking demand. The
expansion of the Courthouse will exacerbate the problem significantly, both during construction
and thereafter, Further, the County will be required to demonstrate that alternative parking will
be provided in order to meet the parking demands prompted by construction of the additional
z
38,000 square feet in the new facility. Craig Benedict, County Planning Director, will present
the options, while Donna Coffey, County Budget Director will provide information regarding cost
of the initiative.
Letters from the County's Employee Relations Consortium and the Courthouse employees that
addresses their concerns regarding the park and ride initiative are attached far your information,
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The County's debt issuance plan presented to the Board at the January
20, 2006 retreat included $10,2 million for construction of the new .Justice Facility and
renovations to the existing New Courthouse, The Budget Director will present fiscal implications
of the park and ride initiative during the presentation. While costs will be more in the first year
of operation due to one time startup costs associated with purchasing vehicles, it is also
important to note that operational costs for the park and ride initiative will vary depending on the
number of buses operated, As a point of reference, the fiscal year 2006-07 Manager's
Recommended Budget includes a reserve fund of $150,000 for the park and ride initiative,
RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Board:
• Receive the report and endorse the design of the Justice Facilities Project (including
Farmer's Market and River Park); and
• Approve the Park-and-Ride/Shuttle initiative in concept and provide direction to staff as
may be appropriate, so that six-months of funding may be included in the 2006-2007
Budget.
3
p„, Orange County
,l u~PiO~~ ~lations C~onsO)~iu~j
post Offie~Box 8181 Chair: R7artha 1loytman
fi811sborough, MC 27278 ~ - Vied-Chair: Tonya Williams
T¢l: 919 732-8181 _ -
May 25, 2006
Dear Board of County Commissioners,
We, the members of the Employee Relations Consortium, are nominated by our
departments to represent all employees of Orange County Goverrunent. It is our mission to
foster effective employee relations by serving as liaisons between employees and
management and encouraging community involvement. As the designated representatives
of Orange County employees, it is the responsibility of the Consortium to respectfully
communicate issues and concerns raised by County employees to the members of
management.
Recently, we have had the opportunity to participate in discussions concerning the parking
near and around the Goverment Services Center and Government Services Annex
buildings, We have learned about the near-term and longer-term issues and have
participated in brainstorming sessions identifying potential solutions,
Employee parking close to the county buildings is one of the benefits of wonting far
Orange County. We recognize that we are very fortunate. Our counterparts at other
university, county, municipal and state offices do not have free panting available near-by
azid are required to utilize distant park-and-ride lots, pay for parking, or both.
We also recognize that the anticipated growth in government facilities in downtown
Hillsborough will limit parking for citizens visiting county buildings.
However, as we learn more about the scope and direction of the changes under
consideration, we have serious concerns for the safety of county employees using the
proposed shuttle service. It is our understanding that the shuttle service maybe available
to the public, specifically for those citizens conducting business at the Govemment
Services Center or the Justice Facility. County employees deal with taxpayers who are
unhappy with county services or family members unhappy with the outcome of a social
services intervention. Sharing a ride on a public shuttle with a family member that the
employee may then face in the tax office, in the courtroom, or at a mediation session is at
best uncomfortable and at worst, dangerous.
In addition, convenient panting near to the workplace enables employees to balance their
work obligations and their personal responsibilities.. Day-care drop-offs and pick-ups,
I
appointments for fancily members, local errands, emergencies, and other day-to-day needs
can be met while still fulfilling work responsibilities.
We believe that any plan for county parking in the Government Services area should
balance the employees' needs for a safe work environment and desires for flexibility with
the community needs for providing parking for citizens transacting business at government
offices_
The Consortium supports offering a number of different altematives to address employee
pazking requirements. Employees would then be free to select that altemative which best
meets their needs while still enabling them to meet their professional work obligations.
The alternatives that we would like to see seriously considered include:
"Park and Walk" where parking is available in the general downtown area, within
walking distance of the Government Services buildings thus freeing the closer-in
parking far citizens and visitors
Designated parking near the buildings which can be "reserved" by employees who
need near-by parking on a specific day (e,g., for a doctor's appointment)
Encouragement ofvan-pooling or car-pooling by employees by designating parking
near the buildings and by providing other incentives, perhaps financial
compensation,
These alternatives do not preclude the possibility of a shuttle service, Instead, they provide
a spectrum of altematives, recognizing the employees' needs as well as the organizational
needs,
We also suggest revisiting the alternative of building a parking garage in downtown
Hillsborough, It is our understanding that the decision to not build a parking garage was
made several yeazs ago. As the pazking needs in the downtown Hillsborough area grow, a
pazking garage may be a viable solution.
We aze hopeful that the group developing reconunendations for your consideration will
consider the potential impact of the recommendations on employee safety, We sincerely
appreciate your support and commitment to Orange County employees through the years,
We hope that your support is fiuther demonstrated while considering the alternatives to
pazking in the downtown Hillsborough area.
Thank you for' your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Orange County Employee Relations Consortium
Cc: Jolm Link, Craig Benedict
2
5
Orange County l;mployee Relations Consortium
Memorandum
To: Orange County Conmlissioners
From: Courthouse staff
The courthouse staff is eagerly awaiting the new facility.. This building will
increase our ability to provide excellent service for any members of the public who have
business at the courthouse.. As the project nears, we have received some distressing
information regarding the parking situation,
It appears that the county is contemplating the use of shuttles to transport
courthouse staff to and from their parked vehicles. We are all aware of the puking
problems at the current facility, We are all also aware of the increasing traffic problems
on Churton Street in Hillsborough. Orange County's rapid growth creates the demand for
the new facility to serve Orange County. The same growth creates problems for the
viability of the efficient fimetion of the facility at tlas location.
Simply put, the courthouse staff carmot efficiently make use of a shuttle system to
and From their workplace. The courthouse is the hub of all legal proceedings in the
cowrty. Already the staff is working at or above capacity. Adding an additional I S
minute it7p to the begirming and a 1 S minute trip to the ending of each day is not fair or
equitable to the staff. Additionally, adding a 15 minute shuttle ride to the begimring and
ending of every single trip for medical, personal orwork-related necessary travel is a
substantial burden to the staff that handles the county's legal records and,judicial
operation. We have all experienced the increased traffic on Churton Street and
reasonably expect that traffic to increase. Tlus situation will cause increased travel time
on a shuttle, Delays and increased wait times are inevitable as the shuttle navigates
tluough town at the busiest puts of the day.
Basic security and accommodation would also make a shuttle a poor option for
courthouse staff. Inside the courthouse, extensive security is planned, Given prior
incidents of assaults and escapes witlun this courthouse, these measures are essential.
Outside the workday, courthouse staff would be confined to a shuttle with the same
people they are to he protected from within the courthouse, This situation is problematic
and potentially dangerous. Defendants and victims would be on the shuttles together,
Prosecutors, lawyers, clerks and court reporters would also have close contact with
citizens involved in volatile situations.. Witnesses and,jurors would similarly be placed in
untenable situations as they attempted to come to court. Clerks would he face to face
with citizens who may resent the role clerks play in collecting child support, late fees or
issuing domestic violence protective orders.
The efficient functioning of the courts is currently a challenge, Ironically, the
new facility may exacerbate the very problem it is intended to solve. Attempting to
shuttle groups of 24 will be a daily exercise in futility. Court proceedings will be
impaired and at the mercy of the shuttle of necessary people to conduct court business,
7
Please take this opportunity to develop a viable solution. Orange County is
committing to building afirst-rate facility,. The limitations of the Churton Street location
present tremendous challenges to the day-to-day operation of this facility. The
courthouse stafflras performed minor miracles to continue efficient operation of an
overworked judicial system in Orange County,. Time spent shuttling to and from work
will be substantial and reduce the staff's ability to effectively serve the citizens of Orange
County. Thank you for helping with these issues..
Dear .Judge Fox and .Judge Buckner:
[)
I have read the attached letter to the Orange County Conunissioners and agree
that parlting for courthouse staffneeds to be provided, Please help us express our
position to the commissioners. Thank you for your help.
Printed name Si afore
~yYU
~ d
! cy,~ ~~~ ~e.~- Gv-rts
,
~ ~ eCS ~
~ ~
.~ ~
L:SF u~ ~, a..ar Lv
L~
GY.~~C i ~A" ~.l~r/\ Cam.. ~'-•""'
f Gr-~t
c,y ( ~~22'~s
e s --?-eP ctvo
row
A a~-l~- a
;~ L _
'avn 5 c,o 1 •
Deaz Judge Fox and .Tudge Buckner:
I have read the attached letter to the Orange County Commissioners and agree
that parking for courthouse staff needs to be provided. Please help us express our
position to the commissioners. Thank you for your help.
Printed name Si e
--
~ r I~ ~ -
!-C ,ICS E c2c2
SCI, illt _,
V>1~`<. lG
l ~/ ~
~ ;r~G~ir-7J
__ _
~ AT .,l T ALL ~ -
~ , :~ .r„ r~
~~( 1 '~
l~.z' U ~-
o'er v ~._.:>
^. ~._-_•
'
c/7~ / cx'. G~ r't.
~
`" m a - Gz~ ~ ~y`-