Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda - 10-03-1983
, AGENDA ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REGULAR MEETING' MONDAY; OCTOBER 3, 1983 ORANGE COUNTY COURTHOUSE SUPERIOR COURTROOM HILLSBOROUGH, NC A. BOARD COMMENTS B. AUDIENCE COMMENTS 1. Matte/L4 on the ptinted agenda 2. Mattets not an the ptinted agenda C. REPORT: : 1 1 . JAIL INSPECTION REPORT D. PUBLIC HEARiNG=CONT/NUATION: 1.. KHVE WENG NG PLANNED DEVELOPMENT' E. BOARD DECISEION ITEMS 1. Fottow-ilp in6oxmation to Manage/Cs August 16, 1983 A64inmative Action Repair. 2. ChAld Cane Agency 3. AniinatiConticalkdinanCe 4. Highway 70 (Business) Petition 5. Fi'Aeman's Retie6 Fund 6. Tax Reund Request 7. Community Devetopnent Rehabititation Contnacts 8. Nationale Famiey Sexuatity Week 9. Budget Amendments iSoa Donated Food - Department to6 Sociat Services 10. Appointments 11 . James Rae Fneetand - Land Use Pean Amendment 12. James Rae Fkeetand - Rezoning Request 13. Ruth WoOds Subdiv4sion - PAetiminaity Mat 14. RobeAt 11.aChanCe - Subdivon Finat Ptat 15. Bihn= 4/004 - l'AetimigaiLy Subdivizion Peat 16. Say Meadoto - Pimeiminaky Subdivi4Zon Peat 17, Lynwood AuLe6 Section TI Pitet-iminany Pat 18. Reddy Wood's Subdivizion - PAeLiinLnaAy Peat 19. Lauftenct Sunny Subdivision - Pketimaaty Ptat 20. Change4 to the Sedbilentation and Enosion ContAoe OAdinance 21. JoAdan Lake Ctassiiication System 22. Executiire Session - Legat Mattexa /(/ � � 1 MINUTES 1 �\» BOARD OuABGo COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS/�OCTOBER � 1903 'W /~/ Orange County Board of Commissioners met in regular session on Monday, Y� October 3, 1983 at 7:30 P.M. in the Superior Courtroom of the Orange County � Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Cacoliva. Commissioners Present: Richard E. Whitted, Chair, and Commissioners Ben Lloyd, Shirley E. Marshall, Norman Walker and Don milIboit - A. almn v ` Commissioner Whitted added an executive session to deal with personnel matters. Item o-1, Public Hearing Continuation should be listed under the E Items - Board Decisions. Item o-1* was deleted from the eqenda, In response to Commissioner Willhoit's concern for the Planning Board minutes, Marvin Collins, Planning Director noted that they were not complete. B. AoDIEMB.-.001=3. 1. N*TTEBG al THE mz, Ward Willard stated that he would like to speak relative to the Animal Control Ordinance. Ms. Josephine Barbour stated that she would like to speak relative to the Child Care Agency. 2. NATTERS mOT_OV-THE PRINTED &G0BDA Mr. Tom Weaver of the Orange County Rescue Squad presented a prize (a chain saw) to Commissioner Lloyd. Sheriff Lindy Pendergrass stated that the jail inspection report was a good one and everything was in compliance with State guidelines; he noted the need for replaced security doors and the replacement of juvenile cells. E. BOARD DKIaIOm ITEM 1. Dollom=np-Jofozmm±ivo to_0aoaeer`s August 25. 1983 Affirmative Action Report (see page of this book) Commissioner Lloyd noted that it appears that basic concerns for Affirmative Action are geared towards minorities and women, and he would like to see some data relative to the handicapped and elderIy, Ms. Beverly Whitehead, Personnel Director stated that the proposal before the Board was a recommendation to develop departmental guals, She noted that the 1981 Affirmative Action Plan did not include either handicapped, elderly or departmental goals, overall County goals for minorities and women were established. Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to amend the number one recommendation, to read develop departmental goals for all protected classes. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, O. E-2 d cacm8geuu�� (owe pages . of this book) Commissioner Whitted noted the need to consider the steps necessary to establish a Department of Children's Services. The County Manager stated that there are two sites available for the housing of a department: a portion of the Grady Brown Building or the office on King Street in Hillsborough which will be vacated by CETA in October. Commissioner Whitted questioned our ability to provide appropriate service delivery, should we locate a Department of Children's Services outside the Human Services Complex. Dr . Michael Sharp responded stating that an important element for success _ in this new endeavor will be to establish identity in and of itself. Commissioner Lloyd expressed some concern that clients of this agency would ' ' ' ' ' m""o" f", +his ~"~rin" is- 57- � ' � 2 cooing from voicing reservations regarding Orange County taxpayers paying the bill. Dr. Sharp stated that in an effort to come up with additional funding, Cbonclloc Fordham of UNC-CH has expressed a dollar figure privately and suggested that funds would be available on an ongoing basis; Eric Munson of North Carolina Memorial Hospital is working actively on trying to come up with dollars. Based on fairly reliable information, if a Children's Council is created, then the Council will be able to procure additional foudiog, Mr. Rob Addelson stated that the Social Services Board has endorsed the second model with substantial additions at an estimated cost of s5900, Commissioner willboit noted that the reason for having an independent department is that it would ■have a greater chance of attracting private funds. Commissioner Marshall stated that there will be a Children's Council which would make recommendations to the gauagez, and would negotiate with the Hospital, the State, the University and other private groups. In response to Commissioner Lloyd's concern, Dr. Janice Schopler, Chair of the Social Services Board, noted that if the Children's Council is created, it will be responsible for priority setting and initial fund raising efforts. Commissioner Marshall spoke to the crisis at the University and the Hospital in providing child care for their employees and the Task Force Report recommendation is that by joining all needs together as well as all resources we can better meet the needs of everybody. Dr. Thomas oeotoo, a member of the Board of Social Services, voiced a concern stating that if a separate agency is created there is no guarantee that the Department of Social Services will agree to contract with this agency. He • noted that the Board of Social Services is responsible for $390,000 in federal funds for day care; that this is a large part of the responsibility of the Board of Social Services; he empathizes with the needs of the University and the Hospital, but neither organization has approached the Board of Social Services in any official capacity to discuss how they may add funding to the Board's Day Care budget. Be stated that in no way has the Department of Social Services ever been an official part of the Task Force but stated he would encourage the Board to give consideration to model #%/ the Board of Commissioners should let the Social Services Board try and provide this service. Commissioner Marshall noted that when the Children's Task Force was establised, both Mr. Ward and Dc. Schopler were asked to serve. Mr. Ward refused and Dr. Schopler did not serve, she kept up to date on the progress of the Task Force, made comments, and the Task Force responded to her comments. Dr. Schopler represented the Social Service Board in her official capacity as chair on the ad hoc nommittee, mc, Ward stated that he was informed by Dr. Schopler that she could not serve on the Task Force but that staff members should be appointed to serve. The Board of Social Services appointed a staff member, but that member has not been allowed to sit on the Task Force. Commissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit to create a Children's Council to look into how we can create a department of Children's Services within the legislation that is presently provided and applying for funds designated by the General Assembly for the specific purpose of setting up such agencies, as well as for ]opkioq for funds within the private sector. VOTE: Ayes, 3; Noes, 2 (Commissioners Lloyd and Walker) . 3 cnnonisnione, Walker questioned why create a separate Counoil, as opposed to having the Social Service Board have the added responsibility. os. Josephine Barbour stated that the purpose was to try and integrate service. She noted that now it looks as if the Board is creating additional Boards and additional people to go with what already existo. E-3 ol _DzslioancP (see pages for a copy of this ordinance) In response to Commissioner Lloyd's concern for when a dog is considered e vicious, Attorney Gledhill stated that when an animal is off the owner's premises and attacks when unprovoked, it is considered viuiovs, In reference to Commissioner Lloyd's question regarding liability, Attorney Gledhill noted that to the extent that someone is negligent or willful, or does an intentional act which injures someone, then it probably is contrary to public policy and is not enforceable. However, there are instances where the act of the Animal Control Ordinance could be either negligent or willful, and would have some application.in that case it . ooe cannot be excused legislatively from negligent or intentional acts. Commissioner Lloyd questioned the term "canvass" in Section E-6. Attorney Gledhill noted that this related to search of pcpmiaes in an effort to control rabies or other serious health problems; due process and other provisions provide that no search can be made without a warrant; questioned about the meaning of Section VIII, Attorney Gledhill stated that this section relates to any state law pertaining to the hunting of dogs and would not be affected by the ocdioauce. Commissioner Whitted stated that this Ordinance allows an agent to have the authority to take action when complaints are registered against animals and is triggered by someone registering a complaint. Attorney Gledhill also noted that there is authority in the Ordinance for Animal Contro] Officers to take action if the violation occurs in their presence. Mr. Ward noted that he had met with the Attorney General's office and the Assistant District Attorney, and it was agreed that this was a good Ordinance, but they had some concerns which he described. The Ordinance should be spelled out clearly, so that there is a common understanding of its provisions, especially as it relates to hunting dogs. Dr. Robert Greenberg reiterated the fact that the Ordinance protects the rights of owners to have security dogs on the premises, even without restraint. A display of vicious behavior by a security dog is not a violation of the Ordinance. Similarly, the Ordinance says that a hunter may use a hunting dog off premises as long as that dog is not creating a nuisance or endangering public health or safety. He noted that there is nothing that would define responsible ownership of a hunting dog to include the right of that dog while hunting, to be creating nuisances or endangering public health or safety. ss. Barbour asked that the Board consider defining hunting dogs, and placing general statute citations in the Ordinance for reference; that in the completed document the pages be numbered. She questioned if there will be search warrants, or if a clerk will "canvass" neighborhoods. When you have fifty acres or more, pinning a dog down seems rather restrictive. Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to adopt the Ordinance with the proposed changes as presented. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0. Commissioner Whitted moved, seconded by Commissioner Walker that the Animal Control Ordinance be effective January 1, 1984. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0. 4 E-4 Highway 70_-1BusioamsJ netiticuz (see petition 01 in the Clerk's permanent file) Susan Smith of the Planning Department stated that the Highway Maintenance Engineer, Mr. Mike Mills, makes the initial determination of what roads need to be resurfaced in the County. Mc. Mills has compiled a list of primary, secondary and urban roads by need, and has forwarded that list to authorities in Greensboro for funding; the number one primary road priority ia U.S. 70 C.R. "Booty" Laws of Eno Township noted that he had pictures and a petition with 573 signatures naming "Highway 70 Business" east of Hillsborough is in immediate need of attention; parts of the road are too narrow for school buses. He suggested that the Board endorse the petition and send it to the oigb*ay- oommiosionecs. Commissioner Walker moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to endorse the petition to resurface the entire road and to request that immediate action be taken to do spot repairs. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, O. E-5 Fireman's Ruljgl_FnDJ Commissioner Walker moved, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to appoint John Carrol and Neil Tapp as trustees to the New Hope Fireman's Relief ruud, VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, V. E-6 Tax npfuod-Beqoest Kermit Lloyd made three requests for tax refunds: 1. D.L. Patterson Trust erroneously listed one car too many. The bill of sale shows the car was sold in September, 1981 to a Pontiac dealer in Greensboro. This resulted in a tax refund as follows: County Tax s41.95 Chapel Hill School Dist. 9,78 Chapel Hill Fire Dist. 4.36 56.09 Commissioner Whitted moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to approve the tax refund as recommended. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, V. 2, Mr. William E. Gaut - Error was made when the wrong house was listed to his lot. The house next door was charged at s64,863 to mc' Gaut, when his house should have been worth q56,858' The difference for 1981 and 1962 is $124.74, which includes the 5% valuation for household property as follows: Iau 1332 TOTALS County tax o46.23 $43.55 $ 89,78 Chapel Hill School oist, n12.27 yI1.21 $ 23.48 So. Orange Fire Dist. $ 5.133 TOTALS $64,38 s60,38 s124'74 Commissioner Lloyd moved, seconded by Commissioner Whitted to approve the tax refund as cenonmeoded, VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0. J, Albert G. and Esther Bivena moved a double wide mobile hone onto a lot in oilloborvugh, It was assumed by the appraiser that it was new in 1979, being picked up for the first time in 1980 but was later found to be a 1974 model. The refund of $143.62 is as follows: 1.9_A2 l,981 1.931) =ALE County , $27.67 o26.06 $83.58 a137.31 " , ", x ` AA o $ 6.31 581 5 $29.18 $27.50 $86.94 $143.62 Commissioner Walker moved, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to approve the tax refund as recommended. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0. E-7 Community Develoment Rehabia• . •1 git Commissioner Walker moved, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to award the three Housing Rehabilitation Contracts: DUA MB= COMBCTOR RIP_LNLVET 19 Lawndale Avenue Frank Griffin & Associates $6,700.00 21 Torain Street Samuel English $3,685.00 61 Hill Street Frank Griffin 6 Associates $4,225.00 VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0. E-8 National Family Sexuali eek (see page _for this resolution) Commissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit to approve the resolution proclaiming October 5-11 as "National Family Sexuality Week". VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0. IlidesL-Ltem_=_Batinna.1 4-H We,e.k Commissioner Walker moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to approve the proclamation for October 2-7 as "National 4-H Week". VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0. E-10 Appointments Commissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit to appoint Gail McClain to the Commission for Women. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes,O. Commissioner Whitted moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to reappoint Joe Rees and James Ray to the Orange County Board of Adjustments. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0. Commissioner Walker moved, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to reappoint John Kizer and David Shanklin to the Orange County Planning Board. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0. Commissioner Lloyd moved, seconded by Commissioner Walker to appoint Tarlton Davis and Robert Murphy to the Hillsborough Planning Board. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0. Commissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to appoint Dot Carey, Leon Waters and Tommy Leonard to the ad hoc School Capital Task Force. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0. Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner to appoint Richard Sharpless as Chair to the ad hoc School Capital Task Force. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0. D-1 Publi _Enar.ins_r__COntinuAliDn: Khye Weng_N_ElanneA DevelQpment (see pages of this book) Commissioner Lloyd moved, seconded by Commissioner Walker to approve the Planning Board recommendations for the requested rezoning and Special Use Permit. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0. E-11 Euhijs Bearing - CohtinPatinm_; AJamee Rae Ereeland_z_Land Use. Plan Amendment The request is to approve amendment to the Land Use Plan from Rural Residential to Ten Year Transition for 3.01 acres in the Hillsborough Township submitted by James Rae Freeland. A Joppa Oaks resident noted that the fire hydrants in this area are not adequate. She stated that there is not enough water pressure for the hydrants; - , +-ht. ninpR in her area are 6 adequate, and now they are being tapped into by another community. Because residents of the proposed development will have to use the triangle section for access, there is a need for approximately twelve driveways in this area which is already over- populated and overutilized. Marvin Collins, Planning Director stated that at the Planning Board meeting it was established that the water pressure will not be affected by additional tap-ons; going from a four inch water line pipe in Joppa Oaks to a six inch pipe across the street, will not cause a drop in the pressure according to Engineer John McAdams. Mr. Collins stated that he had spoken with people from the State, Mr. Freeland and his engineer, and Mr . Rosen from the Town of Hillsborough, and they have come up with plans for the existing water lines and these have been submitted to the State for approval. Commissioner Marshall stated her intention to vote against the motion as she had just received the Planning Board minutes and was not clear about the context of Planning Board objections. Commissioner Lloyd moved, seconded by Commissioner Walker to accept the plan amendment. VOTE: Ayes, 4; Noes, 1 (Commissioner Marshall) . E-12 LablicUearip_g - Continuation: James Rae__Er-ee.land - P.nJ.n Request Commissioner Whitted noted that the request is for R-4 zoning. The Planning Board recommends R-2 zoning and the Planning Staff recommends R-4. The long range plan is to upgrade the existing water system throughout the new development, as well as to increase the water pressure in Joppa Oaks. A Joppa Oaks resident presented a petition of residents of Joppa Oaks opposed to the R-4 plan. Ms. Page noted that at the last Town Board meeting of Hillsborough there was a moratorium placed on extension of tap-one to existing water lines until the issue was cleared with the State. Commissioner Whitted noted that he was in favor of a motion to approve the recommendation from the Planning Staff for the R-4 rezoning, and that the Board's concern is not to create additional problems for Joppa Oaks. Commissioner Walker moved, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to approve the rezoning request. VOTE: Ayes, 4; Noes, 1 (Commissioner Marshall) . E-13 Ruth WooLaBlibaiYis.ipp_7__EuliminALy___EIDt (See Map it]. in Clerk's permanent file) . The Planning Board recommended approval of the preliminary plan for Ruth ' Woods Subdivision subject to the following conditions: (1) that property lines follow site distance lines when they tie into NC 86. (2) clarification be made on the plat of the location of the southern lot line of Lot 1 relative to the easement shown on the Tax Map as part of Lot 1. Commisioner Lloyd moved, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit to accept the recommendations set forth by the Planning Board. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0. E-15 Biraa.m Woods -__ELglipUnxv_Subslivis.ion Plat (see page of this book. In an effort seeking approval of the preliminary plat for Birnam Woods Subdivision, property of A.A. Willette, Jr. , the Planning Board recommends approval subject to the following conditions: (1) further subdivision of the property will require a public road constructed for NC DOT standards. (2) that the calculated maximum impervious surface requirements be noted on the plat. Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to accept the • .F,r4-1, hi, +-hp PlAnninc Board. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0. 5,82 7 E-16 Bsy_8eaLoyo- ---prezimivary auludiviaion Plat (see page of this book) The Planning Board recommends approval of the preliminary plat for the Bay Meadows property of Joseph J. and Diana K. Falcone subject to the following: (1) renumber lots seven and eight to lots five and six. (2) right-of-way be shown for the turn-around on the plat. Commissioner Walker moved, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to approve the recommendations from the Planning Board subject to the stated conditions. VOTE: Ayes, 5; moea, 0. E-17 oeotino_7I - Pz2liminacy Plat (see pages of this book) The Planning Board recommended approval of the preliminary plat for Lynwood Acres II, property of Nei G. Beard and Lue Simopoulos-Beard, with the condition that the calculated maximum impervious surface requirements be noted on the plat. Commissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to approve the Planning Board recommendations. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0. E-18 Reddy Woods 5ubdivinioo - Preliminary Plat (see pages of this book) The Planning Board recommended approval of the preliminary plat for Reddy Woods, property of James Collins, subject to the following conditions: (1) note on plat that Lots 2-10 have access only from Stedfast Road. (2) lot l (one) has access from SR 113I. Commissioner Lloyd moved, seconded by Commissioner Walker to approve the Planning Board's zecomn/codatioos, VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0. o-I9 Iakzeogx_5umoe,y�-91.ib.dioi.O.ion-=-Er.eIimioPXx- Plat (see page of this book) Commissioner Lloyd moved, seconded by Commissioner Whitted to approve the preliminary plan for Lawrence oumn,ey Subdivision. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, O. o-20 Cbmngcs'-ro tbe -8e4ioRDIalinn and ocoeixu�-Contzol Ordinance (see page for this Ordinance) Ms. Susan Smith stated that the Carrboro Water Task Force had approved and recommended changes to the Orange County Sedimentation and Erosion Control Ordinance for application to the University Lake watershed and proceeded to highlight the significant changes. Ms. Smith noted that the Carrboro Task Force is creating some administrative difficulties that have not been resolved in any discussions with the Town of Carrboro. These issues relate to: - typical zoning requirements in terms of enforcing buffers, toxic wastes standards, etc. , and - specification of techniques under Section 11 - Access and Haul Roads - the provision specifies a technique, a detail not employed elsewhere in the Orange Conty Sedimentation and Erosion Ordinance. The Ordinance should set objectives leaving it up to the developer and the approval of the administrator to establish a technique to meet the objective. Ms. Smith noted (relative to Item 1, page 105) that because so many jurisdictions are involved, it is best to have a uniform standard which could best be applied to all three watersheds rather than point out one watershed for protection under a county-wide Ordinance. She stated that there is a need to set out administrative procedures early rather than wait until the Ordinance is adopted. t)tSC: 8 Taylor Currin, North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development, the person who will review the Ordinance provisions and make a recommendation to the N.C. Soil and Water Commission, indicated that the proposed changes to the Ordinance are confusing and difficult to interpret for approval because of references made to specific areas; if different areas have different requirements, he suggests establishing separate Ordinances; stormwater management requirements are difficult to enforce, requiring more time and staff. Mr. Currin recommended that the Board not approve the Ordinance changes as written. Ms. Smith stated that the Planning Department is encouraging the Board to send the Ordinance back to staff for review and a statement of concerns, then to the State Commission for approval when revised, and finally resubmitting the Ordinance to the Board for approval. Commissioner nillboit noted that the staff should go through the Ordinance and address all of the concerns of Carrboro and make some decisions relative to what can be more appropriately applied under the Zoning Ordinance and bring it back to tbe Board with a proposal for recommended changes. o-2I no System The Board is considering recommendations to NRCD Secretary Grimsley's Jordan Lake initiative conveying the concern for health implications relative to the use of the Jordan Lake as a drinking water supply. Commissioner Whitted noted that the Task Force is meeting Friday, October 7, 1983. Commissioner millhoit noted that there is a need for water quality measures. He added to the information on the abstract an outline of distinctions in water quality classification and that this information on the agenda should be in addition to the statement already endorsed by the Board. Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Walker to approve the recommendations made to NRCD Secretary ocimoley' VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, 0. Commissioner Whitted announced that Governor Hunt had listed Orange County as a diaster area, thus making interest loans available to the farmers. Commissioner Whitted moved, seconded by ComMianinnec nillhoit to go into executive session to discuss a personnel matter. Richard E. Whitted, Chair Beverly A. Blythe, Clerk APPROVED 2/6/84 e / , . 001 s c _ _ . , _. ._ . __ ____ _.. _ .,...„,z.... :...,,,, 4'....,1 • STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES Division of Facility Services JAMES B.HUNT...JA. =YMCA P.O.BOX 12200 RALEIGH 27605-2200 I.e w�c�saN,JR. owcaos SARAH T.MORROW,MD..,MP.t TOZvte necarrAwr (919) 733-4360 August 18, 1983 Nr. Lindy P ndergrass, Sheriff Orange Coun Sheriff's Department 125 Court S reet Hillsboro, N rth Carolina 27278 Dear Sheriff Pendergrass: On August 13 1983, r, Francis .I. Poole, Jail Consultant from the North Carol Department o Human Resources, inspected the Orange County Jail. Enclosed,•is a copy of the inspection report for your attention. Immediate action should b- initiated as soon as possible to correct any deficiencies cited in the report. If I or any member of the Jail. and Detention staff may be of assistance to you concerning this or any detention matter, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, 1 rrancis J. P.7 -,. Area Consultant Jail and Det::ftion Branch FJP:klc Enclosure. cc: Mr. Thomas A. Ritter, Head, Jail and Detention Branch Mr. Rich4rd Whitted, Chairman, Orange County Board of Commissioners Mr, Ken Thompson, Orange County Manager 002 -7023 v, 6/81) 'LOCAL CONFINEMENT FACILITY SEMIANNUAL INSPECTION NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES DIVISION OF FACILITY SERVICES JAIL AND DETENTION BRANCH Post Office Box 12200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27605 Inspection Date. Aueust 13. 1983 Time 1 • orangs. Caunty J'afl County Orange County, !dress 125 Court Street, Hillsboro. N.C. Sheriff/Chief of PoliceLindv Pendergrass Aef Jailer Capacity 42 Date Built 1982, of Confinement L'eVela_ 2 Total Jail Staff 8 Jailers: Male 4 Female 16 Aff on Duty: Male 11 Female_ 1 Inmates Confined: Male 18 Female 0 ility Staff Schedule: 8-hour shifts 12-hour shifts X Other 1st shiftl 7:00 AM - 7:00 pm 1 male During term of court, two jailers 2nd shift 7:00 pm - 7:00 am 1 male are on duty on first shift 1 STRUCTURAL DEFICIENCIES OR INADEQUATE PROGRAM SERVICES IN THIS BLOCK v may jeopardize the safe custody, safety, health, or welfare of persons con ul fined in the facility and thus result in an immediate order for corrective y action or closure as provided in G.S. 153A-223. The governing body shall X i consider the entire report at the first regular meeting after receipt of , ! a the report and shall promptly initiate any action necessary to bring the facility into conformity with the standards as provided by G. S. 153A7222. A. SUPERVISION Continuous supervision is provided to the following types of inmates as required by G.S. 153A-224,1Section .1500 of the North Carolina Minimum Standards for the Operation of Local Confinement Facilities: 1 1. Adult Males _ X 2. Adult Females must be su•ervised onl b female jailers 3. Juvenile Males (must be supervised only b male 'ailera 4. Juvenile Females (must be supervised only by female jailers a. MEDICAL CARE The unit has a written medical plan properly posted which functions effectively as required by G.S. 153A-225 and Section .1800 of the North Carolina Minimum Standards for the.4).eration of Local Confinement Facilities. X C. SANITATION The sanitation of the unit is maintained in accordance with rules and regulations adopted under G.S) I53A-226 to effectively protect the health of inmates and _ public. X D. FOOD SERVICE The diet is adequate as required by Section .1700 of the North Carolina Minimum. X Standards for the Operation of Local Confinement Facilities. 003 IS-7023 ev. 6/81) .. e 2. ---7 STRUCTURAL DEFICIENCIES OR INADEQUATE PROGRAM SERVICES IN THIS BLOCK may jeopardize the safe custody, safety, health, or welfare of persons con- fined in the facility and thus result in an immediate order for corrective ' 1 action or closure as provided in G. S. 153A-223. The governing body shall n consider the entire report at the first regular meeting after receipt., of a the report and shall promptly initiate any action necessary to bring the facility into conformity with the standards as provided by G. S. 153A-222. e E. FIRE SAFETY There are at least two complete sets of facility and emergency exit keys as required by Section .1401, paragraph a , of the Minimum Jail. Standards. (There are 7 sets of keys in the facility.) 2. One complete set of facility and emergency exit keys not in use is stored in a safe place but accessible to supervisory personnel for use in an emergency as required by Section .1401, Baragraph b, of the Minimum Jail Standards. 3. Approved, permanently identified mattresses in good condition are pro- vided as required by Section .1412 of the Minimum Jail Standards. _____---- 4. Sufficient fire extinguishers are available as required by Section .11413- .1415 of the Minimum-lail Standards. ------ -- .• 5. Fire. extinguishers bear a current inspection tag and are maintained in a fully charged and operable condition as required by Sections .1416 and .1417 of the Minimum Jail Standards, ,---_____- -- g. Menne of egress in sufficient number comply with N.C. Building Code and G.S. 69712 for each level. 7. Emergency exit doors are approved type, keyed to both sides, are func- tional,l and comply with N.C. Building Code. --------- ---- B. The confinement facility is of fire-resistive construction materials and unattached to any structure of less than firn-resistive construction unless 'separated by an approved fire wall as specified by the N.C. Building Code. ------------ 1 - 9. There i s a plan for the emergency evacuation of inmates as required by Section .1505, Paragraph a, of the Minimum Jail Standards. 10. The facility has a master fire plan posted as required by Section .1506, Paragraph a, of the Minimum Jail Standards. 11. Jailersjiave been trained in the use of fire fighting equipment as re- quired by Section .1506, Paragraph b, of the Minimum Jail Standards. ------------ 12. Fire drills are conducted at least quarterly and recorded as required by Section .1506, Paragraph b. of the Minimum Jail Standards. 13, Sufficient number of smoke detectors with automatic audible alarm and test caPability, in operating condition, to monitor all inmate occupied areas, as required by Section .1419 of the Minimum Jail Standards. ------- ---------- • • . _ . 004 -7023 . 6/81.) 3 . 1:7 17 t cu u w 0 0 8 .- -, 0 .. 0 # o 4., a c..) fi w a a •IJ 141 44 1 VC , Construction Ma erials as. Required by Minimum Standards A. Paint 1111 B. Bunks I nIIIIIIIIIIIIII C. Floors I 111111111111111 . - fl. Walls I NIIIIIIImp Ceilin:.s I 111111111111111. F. indows I ' rim1111111111 !:. Security Screens illillinifil H. Doors and Integral Locks F1111111 X. Da room S.uiPment J. Steel Grating 0.1111111111 IN '-'.. Wiring and Electrical Fizt1.-7—'es—) .--- 111111/1111111111 L. Safety Vestibules 1111111111111111 M. Mul i.le Docir Locking Mechanisms with Mechanical Overr de 111111111111111 N. Floor Drain Accessible to Inmates are Provided with Secure 111111111 I Fasteners I I ?. Grouping. of Prisoners A. Segregation of Females (G.S. 153A-228, G.S. 14-261, Minimum Standards) iL Segregation of Juveniles G.S. 153A-221.1, Minimum Standards Safety and Secu lity Features 111111 A. Local Fire tepartment Has Been Requested to Inspect Facility In Its Fire Prevention Ins.ection Pro:ram D. Mirrors Comply With Standards 0.1111111.11111 C. Safety-Type Razors for Shaving are Provided 1111.=11111 D. Visiting Areas are in Com.liance with Standard Requirements 111711111111111111 I;. Conference Area is Provided for Attorneys and Clergymen 113IXIIIIII1 F. Medical Clinic Area is Provided NrIMI1111§11 G. Booking Areal Provides Pro.er Security 1111111 WI H. All Locks are Kept in Good Working Order . ii7111.1111111 Heat Lights Windows, or Controls are Not Accessible to Prisoners113111111111 J. Security Sect on Doors are Kept Loc ed INIIIIIIIIIIII K. Facility is Hazard Free • Iff1111111111111 _ _____....... Zpace Utilizatio A. A. roved Hal ing Area is Provided and Pro.erl E.ui..ed 1111 B. P an is Provided to Handle Excess Pop ation S .0 d Overcrowded ConditiOns Exist in the Facility 1111111111 C. Overcrowding Does Not Occur EMU 005 . , . _ .. . . . .. • .?023 . . URI.) cl) 1111. u a) c '2) m . .Z7 cii P. ,-5' o .. c., c - o c -. ,--f -Q .w 111111111111 Structural Arrangements and Accommodations , I A. Single Cells Conform in Size to Minimum Standards m, Multi.le Cells Conform in Size to Minimum Standards Cel. Areas Itilizing a Common Dayroom Do Not Exceed, Multiples of twenty-four (24) Persons 1111111111 I; Tf Facility Has Dormitory-Type Confinement, Size Conforms to 11111111 Standards I . No More Than Sixteen CT Persons are eld in.Any Dormitory Facility Has Sufficient: 1. Number'of Commodes 11111111111 2. Num.er Of Lavatories 61111111111111 3. San tarY Dr nking 'rater 01,11M1111 4. -1-11Nuof Showers E111111111111 5. Tem.ered Water-- 101•111111 6'.: )ayroomISpace E11111111111 F. Sufficient Storage Space is Provided . - 6, Heat, Light and Ventilation A. Heat. (Type: Electric heat pump ) is Adequate u. Ventilation (Type: HVAC ) is Adequate Ill C. Lighting (Attificial X Natural X us Ade. ate I Personal Hygiene and Comfort 1 1111 A. Clean and Adequate Bedding is Provided B, Necessary Towels and Soa for Bathing iFe Provided . E11111111.111 r, Juveniles alio Provided Toothpaste, Toothbrush, Soap, Towels, Bedding and 'Combs IIIIIIIIIII D. Ad-.uate Laund Services are Provided N111111111111 ',. medical Care I lip A. Supervisors Understand Responsibility ana Requirements in Submitting Death Reports . D. The Mentally' 11 are Properly Otia-R-are and Expeditiously NI I Transferred to a Medical Facility C. Inmates with anfectious or Contagious Diseases EMMEN I I III ',. Food and Sanitation A. If Food is not Prepared at the Facility, Food Catering is Handled by Written Agreement as Prescribed B. 'risoners are *my •e. T ree 3 A.equa e Yea s 'er )ay 1E1111111 I C. 1 e an. 'ea, c e.0 e are in amp ance 'inimum an.ar.s 1E11111111M D. ' c en •ppears ean an. an ary . MI1111111 ' . . 0 0 _ , . . • 1023 15/81) , 5 411117' a w 9. Continued E. Kitchen. Equipment is Adequate F. Clean-up Stations and Equipment'are Provided nE1 1111 G. Jail A.'ears to be Clean and Sanitary rummy. H, Sanitationllnspection Recommended: Yes No x I. Reports are Submitted as Prescribed (G.S. 108-30 1111111111 tO, Are there any plans for new construction or major renovation: Nn If yea, describe:. Pr, IL Name(s) of Person(s) Contacted: Jail Administrator W. Paul Cook , Jailer John Jailer Ms. Jacqueline Bradsher i2, Comments: ,110 ENTRY INDICATES ITEM NOT APPLICABLE Sheriff Pender5mass stated that he is aware of his responsibilities under the Federal Civil Rights Act regarding segregation by race. Item 1,F: Replace damaged glazing in juvenile cell. Item 2,3: Although structurally approved to hold juveniles, none are held in the facility, but are transported to the detention center in Durham County Item 3,J: All security doors should remain locked. Jail Consultan Mr. Richard Whitted, Chairman, Orange County Board of Commissioners Mr. Ken Thompson, Orange County Manager • , •■••■ • ro; •1.II I I*i' ACTION AGELMA IW ABSTRACT Item No. 94 MEEEING DATE October 3, 1983 . • Subject: Request by Khye Wang Ng and his wife Guat Cheog for a reiouing from Agricultural-Residential. (A-R) to Planned Development - Industrial (PD-OX) and Class A Special Use Permit Planning • . i Public Heartng: es ; I A t S : Initametion Contact: Application, Susan Smith Narrative, TaxlMap mom Number, 732-8181 EXT. 349 FJELDOSE: To consider approval of the requested rezoning and Special Use Pe4mit. 1 NEED: The applicants have requested a PD-1. designation for property located at .he Southwest corner of the intersection of NC 86 and SR 1332 (Coleman Loop An industrial building for the packaging and production of a sweet and so r sauce isiplanned by the applicants. The 5.03 acre. tract is proposed to h=ve access along NC 86. Traffic figures for NC 86 are 4500 trips/day (1978). The Orange County Health Department has approved the lot for on site sewage d.sposal and a well is proposed. The site is wooded and the building is proposed •o be set backlfram the road. The area is located in the Orange Rural Fire District and will be served by- the Orange Rescue Squad, IMPACT: The property is located in the HB-2 Rural-Industrial node as designated b the Land UselPlan and, therefore, would conform with the Land Use Plan if rez ned. The development intensity of the proposal meets the minimum required for pen space and parking spaces and does not etceed the maximum allowed Floor Ar a. :OMMENDATION: The Planning Board recommends approval subject to the following imposed co ditions 1. That a plat showing the lot and proposed buildings be recorded prior to the start of construction. 2. Drainage, soil erosion, and sedimentation plans shall be received by th Orange County Erosion and Sedimentation Control Officer. The installat on of control devices and on-going construction work shall be inspected by Orange County. The site shall be inconformance with the Soil Erosion aid Sedimentation Control Ordinance, 3. That DOT access standards be met and a driveway permit obtained. 4. That all signs shall comply with Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance. Planning Staff concurs, %.,;..i 008 . , . . . i . . . 1 1 Khye Weng Ng & wife Guat Cheng Class A Special Use Permit Application . , ..,1 . . . The following information is the Orange County Planning Staff's findings of fact concerning Khye WengNg & wife Guat Cheng's request for a Class A. Special Use Permit under Section 8.8.23 of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance. The corresponding zoning district applied for is Industrial-I. . - The following evidence has been supplied by the applicant or by the Orange County Planning, Department. ... - .-3..;. L'Et121.e222291---.altises Ordinance requires: • Findings; 8.2.1 a) The applicant. shall have the The Planning Staff finds that the H.1 burden of establishing, by competent applicant has presented competent material and substantial evidence, the ' material and substantial evidence ._... existence of the facts and conditions ' for the approval of the request, which this ordinance requires for with the attached imposed conditions. . , approval; and ' . . . 8.2.1 b) The Board shall make written The applicant has provided figures findings certifying compliance with that indicate compliance with Article the specific rules governing such in- 5 Dimensional Requirements and ArticlE dividual Special Use and that the use, 6, Application of Dimensional Require- - - which is listed as a Special Use in the ments. There are no requested district in which it is proposed to be variances from requirements. . '-- located, complies with all required reg- ulations and standards, including the provisions of Article 5 and 6 of this ordinance, unless greater or different regulations are contained in,the indi- vidual- standards for the specific Special Use. It shall be the respon- - sibility of the applicant to present evidence in the form of testimony, . . exhibits, documents, models, plans , . .. and the like to support the application ■ for approval of a Special. Use. , . 8.2.2 Where the Board finds a perpon- , derence of evidence to indicate com- pliance with the general standards, • specific rules governing the specific use and that the use complies with all . required regulations and standards, the .„ application must be approved unless the Board shall also find, in some specific manner that: V ...m......-- . 11111 . . : . • . . . . . . .. , _ : — 1., ; . . - . • . . . . 1 . . . . ., . , . 009 __-_---. . r i i a) The use will not promote the public a) The Planning Staff finds that ther: health, safety and genera], welfare, if is a perponderence of evidence to indi. located where proposed and developed compliance with the general stand rds according to the Plan as submitted; and specific rules. governing the pee'- Use and that the use complies gen rail . with required regulations. The f liow imposed conditions are to be cons-dere. a part of the general standards d specific rules for this request. b) The use will not maintain or enhance b) No evidence was presented to he the value of contiguous property (unless Planning Staff to show that it vii I. the use is a public necessity, in which aot enhance or maintain property case the use need not maintain or enhance values of contiguous property. the value of contiguous property); c) The use is not in compliance with the c) No evidence was provided to .1.e general plans for the physical development Planning Staff indicating that t.e of the county as embodied in these regula- .- use is not in compliance with th. tions or in the Comprehensive Plan, or Land Use Plan. The use is loCat.d wit. portion thereof, adopted by the Board of the Major Business Forma (HB-2) County Commissioners Rural Industrial activity node. 8.2.4 In addition to the General Standards stated in 8.2, the following specific standards whall be addressed by the applicant before the issuance of a Special Use Permit: 1 - a) Method and adequacy of provision of a) The Orange County Health Dep.rtmen sewage disposal facilities, solid waste, has approved an area on this lot for and water . an in-ground sewage disposal sys em. An individual well will provide -ater. Solid waste disposal. will be by ontra. with a private hauler. (W.A=14 b) Method and adequacy of police, fire b) Polioaprotection will be by the and rescue squad; protection. Orange County Sheriff's Departme.t. Fire41rotection will be provided by th Orange Rural. Volunteer Fire Depa toent rescue protection by Orange Rese ue .... . Squad. This development should ot present any problems to these ag-ncies c) Method and adequacy of vehicle access c) This site is located in Hill:borou to the site and traffic conditions around Township at the intersection of C 86 the site. 1. and Coleman Loop Road (SR 1332). Traf counts by North Carolina Depart.-nt of Transportation were 4,500 ADT o NC 86 (1978); 400 ADT on 1332 (1981)- NC 86 is designated as an arterial by the Orange County Land Use Plan. I. is estimated that this development ill generate 48 trips per day. 1 .41.,....... i 1 : ; • - . 010 . I There is on entrance proposed for this development located approximately 330' from the intersection of Coleman op Road and NC 86. d) Specific requirements of all special use:requests: 8.8 a) The following additional infor- The following are specific requiraeflt nation is required for all Special. Use for this special use request: Applications: Three copies of the Site Plan prepared A site plan has been supplied. by a registered North Carolina land surveyor or engineer which shall contain the following: 1. North point scale and date. 1. North point, scale and date :hown. I 2. Extent of area to be developed. 2. Extent of area to be developq-d is 1 , indicated. 3. Locationshtidihs of all easements 3. The location of easements a.• righ* and rights of va within or adjacent to of way are shown. the site. 4. Location:of all existing or proposed 4. All existing and proposed st. ctur,. structures on the site. are shown on the site plan. 5. Location of all areas on the site 5. There are no flood prone are on subject to floodlhazard or inundation the site. as shown on flooc. maps or soil S maps. !" 6. Location of all water courses on 6. There are no water courses s own o. the site, including direction of flow, the site plan. I 7. Existing topography at a contour 7. Existing topography is shown interval of fivelfeet based on mean level datum. 8. Proposed or existing fencing, screening, 8. Storage and warehousing faci /ties gates, parking, Service and storage areas. will be located in the proposed .uildi. 9. Access to si e including site screened from adjacent .roper'17:::: :11.elIA:::s by existing vegetation. distances on all toads used 'for access. , site plan. 10. Elevations f all structures pro- 10. Architectural elevations ha a bee posed to be used in the development, supplied to the Planning Staff. 11. Names and addresses of owners and 11. The name and address of the owner applicants, have been supplied. 12. A fee, as set by the Orange County 12. The application !!ee has be. paid Board of Commissioners. by the applicant. 8.8.23 Planned Developments , . • . I ' ! ! 0 8.8.23.1 Additional Information 8.8.23.1 This refers to the st •..ards set forth in Article 7 Planned Development. In addition to the information required in Subsections 81.2 and 8.8, information shall be supplied as part of the application as per applicable requirements of Article 7. Article 7 Plannea Development Districts 7.4.1 Relationship. of Planned Develop- 7.4.1 Relationship of this proj-ct to meat to Major,Transnnrtation Facilities, major transportation facilities, (See 8.2.4. c above). Requires that Planned Developments make use of majoil. roads for access, and public transportation facilities bet. available. 7.4.2 Relationship of Planned Develon7 7.4.2 Relationship to Public UtAitie- ment to Public Utilities, Facilities, FaciIitiesi and Services. (See :.2.4 - and Services. " above): Requires that Planned Developments make use of existing utility systems and not require the public extension of such systems. It also requires that the Planned Development make use of "public transportation if available. 7.4.3 Physical Character of-the Site; 7.4.3 Phyail Character of the -ite; Relation to Surround Property. Relation to irrounding Property. The site shall be suitable for the type This property ; mostly wooded wi h a development proposed and be free from mixture of hardwood and pines, s..e adverse natural impacts. of which are mature. The northe • end of the property is relatively fla While the southern portion slopes toward the creek south of the pro!erty. It is proposed that as much of th- sit as possible will remain in itspr:sent state. 7.17 Planned Development Industrial. Districts. 7.17.1 Planned Development:, Industrial The Staff feels that this develop.-nt Districts"Definedrintent; Wherelermitted. as proposed is substantially in co. pliance with the intent of the 'PD i section. Planned Development - Industrial Districts are districts for the establishment of complimentary groupings of related industrial activities • - • It is the intent of these regulations to provide for development of such districts as locations appropriate in terms of the Land Use Plan and the Orange County Thoroughfare Pianland in accord with standards set forth herein. It is further intended that PD-I shall: 1. Encourage concentration of complementary uses grouped adjacent to streets serving large trafficevolumes, providing well planned development on sit with adequate frontage and depth to permit controlled accessIto streets and reduce marginal traffic friction; 2. Serve an an alternate to further extensions of industrial zoning .. allowing disorderly strip development; and 3. Protect stability and property values in surrounding residential neighborhoods; • I b.) Minimum Area Required for Establishment of District: Access Requirements- No such district shall be established with a net land area of less than two acres- with width and depth adequate for the°plan proposed but with at least two hundred feet of frontage on an arterial street. • ,.. . „ . . ,.._._. . •, . ..,,, ' . , . . . . . . • . . .. . . . . :........ . .........■.........-.... ,' ...--- -.-- . .... 7.1.7.c Permitted Principal and Accessory Uses and, Structures, I Permitted Principal and accessory uses The proposed use and buildings aI,t"7" and structures shall be according to permitted in the 1-1 district and the Article 4,and the corresponding zoning proposed buildings do not exceed districts. In addition,applications for maximum allowed levels. The prop sed amendments to PD-i zoning may be ,use is appropriate in the locatio , denied if the. proPosed district does not - proposed. contain facilities deemed complementary and compatible or if a. particular group of uses, in themaelves complementary and , compatible, would!be inappropriate in the location proposedlbecanse of the character of surrounding development and/or zoning, [ d) Floor Area Limitations • 1 Maximum floor are a. permitted in any PD-/ The proposed floor area does not rcee district shall belas established in Article the maxiamm floor area allowed. 5.1.2 for the corresponding zoning district. e) Height Lim4tations Maximum height of buildings shall be as The proposed buildings do not exc ed established in Article 5 and Subsection allowed heights. 6.2. [ , f) Pedestrian and Landscaped. Common Area Requirements. In general, pedestrian and landscaped common Not applicable. area requirementsishall be as established - in Section 5.2.1. iProvided, however that the Planning Board may recommend, and Board of Commissioners require, lesser amounts of pedestrian and landscaped COWM017, area where: the type of uses involved and the location in relation to adjoining development and zoning, justify such reduction,, hut In no case shall suOM area requirements be reduced to less that .10 times the net laud area of the district. g) Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements 1 Off-street parking and loading requirements One space per employee is require shall be as established in Article 10.4. and one space per employee is pro ided Provided, however; that the Planning Board for. may recommend, and Board of Commissioners require, lesser amounts of off-street parking space where the type of uses involved, or combined use of parking areas, clearly justifies such reduction. _ . . , • , . . . . , . . , .. 1 . , , • . • , 014 . . 1 h) Underground Electrical, and Telephone Utilities. Electrical and telephone service lines shall All, utility lines will be located be undergrqund in an PD-I district, underground. i) Sign Limitat/ns. Sign limitations Ishall be as provided for The sign will not exceed 32 square PD-C Districts ad Subsection 7.15.9. feet on each side and will meet a' l requirements in Article 9. j) Site Planning. Site planning considerations and requirPmProts All site planning considerations shall be as provided for PD-C districts at and requirements in Subsection 7.15.10 Subsection 7.15.0 will be met. The Planning Staff finds that there is a preponderance of evidence to indicate substantial compliance with' the General. Standards and specific rules governing the Planned DevelOpment - Industrial I, Class & Special. Use Permit. The Planning Staff recommends approval of the request with the following imposed conditions: I . 1. That a plat showing the lot and proposed buildings be recorded prior to the start Of construction. i 2. Drainage soil erosion, and sedimentation plans shall be received by the Orange Coi*nty Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Officer. The installation cif control devices and on-going construction work shall be inspected by Orange County. The site shall be in conformance with the Soil. Erosion and Sedimentation Control. Ordinance. 3. That DOT accejs standard's be met and a driveway permit obtained. 1 I 4. That all sign shall comply with Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance, El ...._ / / . . . . .- . , • -• • • • • • ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEP-A=4MM MGCSBOROXTGEC NORM CA.ROXINA‘ 27278:' . TO ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING. BOARD FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF DATE: AUGUST 9 . I98T RE: REZONINM. REQUEST AND CLASS A SPECIAL USE. PERMIT GENERAL INFORMATION Appl Khye Weng:'Ng and wife Guat Chen 4 Ng. Route 3, Box 18Z ii-tIl'sborough,. N.C. 27278 Location: Southwest corner of the intersectlenof N.C. Highway 86. and State Road 1332. (Coleman Loop) REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning and. Class, A Special Use Permit from A-R Residential tor PD-I1 Planned Development Industrial 1 to build an industrrai building for the packaging, and production of a sweet and sour sauce. Lot Size: - 5.03 acres. Existing Land Vacant wooded tract Use: Surrounding- Land North- - State Road 1332', and Major Business Forms, which rs Use and Zoning: zoned.I.-1 South - undeveloped land- zoned A-R East - NC 86 and. an A-R district on the east side of NC 86 We.st A-R district with one residence Land Use Plan: The Land: Use Plan- designation for the tract is Agricultural- Residential.. The tract is also located within the H8-2 Rural Industrial activity node designated in the adopted Plan.. The requested PD-Il district is compatible with the referenced Land Use Plan designations. The Industrial-1 destrict is the only iindustriai district appropriate •for this area. • • • 416 • Other applicable regulations areas follows: DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS A-R I-1 Lot area/dwelling unit 40,000 sq. ft. 80,000 sq. f Lot width 1 150 ft. 200 ft. Front Yard 40 ft. 50 ft. Side/rear yards 20 ft.. 50 ft. Building height 25 ft. .45 ft. SITE DEVELOPMENT- COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS Ta give sane indication of the impact of development of the 5.03 acre tract, the different standards of the A-R and. PO-I-1 zoning.districts were applied to s ow difference inithe two districts as they apply to this situation_ Traffic g- Brat water consumption and sewage flow were then applied to ascertain the effect •f th project an NC-86.. These calculations are shown on the accompanying table. APPLICATiON CRITERIA The intent of the Light Industrial-I (I•1) District Is to prow de appropriately located and sized sites for limited industrial u es- engaged in manufacturing, processing, creating and assembling f. ,goods, merchandise or equipment. Performance standards will b used to insure the absence of adverse impacts beyond the Toned ate ,space occupied by the building. Section 4.2-.211 of the Zoning Ordinance states that the district designation i11 be applied where the fallowing, conditions exist: I. The site is located outside of the Chapel Hill Joint Planning Area and.wilthirr an Industrial Transitlon Activity node or a Rural Industr at Activity Node. Staff Comment: The site ifs located In a Rural Industrial node centered around the Into sect of NC 86 f and. State Road. 1332 (Coleman Loop). T. Lot size for individual uses shall be appropriate to the method of w ter supply: and sewage disposal. Staff Comment: Pr septic. tank system' has been approved by the Health Department for the 5.03 acre lot.., I t is proposed that an on-site well wi 1 I serve the lot; hove r, there is a water line approcimateiy 2100' from this property. The appl i ant have indicated they may extend this line to their project. • ..................... .. x COMPARATIVE A ALYSIS/DEVELOPHENT IMPACTS t• ZONING DISTRICT :t CHARACTERISTIC A-R PDILI Land Area 5 5 Street B/W Area {1j *5� H/A ... Net Development Area ' > I Maximum Floor l'ea-Allowed H/A 19, 774444 Sq., f�. Total Floor Area proposed N/A 6,3oi} sy. ft. -� Lot Area/Dvlel i lhg (bui lding) 4€I.Ookjq._ft. 9,000-sq-,—f�► - . �_� -- ---. Density (Dwellings/Acre] .89 N/A l 9,053.80 0 en Sp ace Re ul ed N/A s f � .. Open Space Proposed N/A 212,19i.aq, is Estimated Trlps/Dwelling(31 8.87 , . NIA' Traffic Generation 34.48 APT 48 APT Parking Spaces Required N/A 8 Parking Spaces Proposed = N/A 8- .'''. Water/Sewage Plow/Dwelling M 400 9#4 H/R. Net Water/SeWage_Flow :. + 1600 god 200 opd Projected Student. Populat1a M) 11 H/A Elementary 5 5 'NIA fil dd le 3 #/A dr. High 2 NIA.. Sr. Illgil - Recreation' Area Required H/A ' H/A Soufce-Notes: 1) 0ased on.percentages taken from•subdiviaipn* of v9mparpbl4-IQt sl?p- ± 2 Land area avgllable aft x'dedugtIon 0*laAd'requirsd for f94P9l:I9pal .usa by LUI-Land Uie Intensity Marino a Count Trl Qeeration Stud I#} John McAdams Vompsnypy y 51 2.8 persons/household t.80j of households:.Y111h schnoi�l age hlldretl.{ plsti-il,ution rr0$-Elementa . l $ lilddle= �r� lfleh and ..`.,X � r 018 3. A s would consist of direct vehicular access to streets designated either arterial or collector by the Land Use Fla . Access to rail service is desirable, but not required.. Staff Comment: N.C.. Highway 86. has been classified as an arterial in the Orange County Land Use Plan. Direct access to this facility Is available froar the property in question. Arterials are thoroughfares that provide the best service (shortest travel times) to and from important employment, shopping, educational and pop laticxr centers.. They are characterized by relatlyely high travel speeds with minimum Interference to through traffic. Because.of the importance, of N.C. 86: as an arterial or"traffic mover", are must be: taken to protect this function. 1rt 1.978, traffic ivolumes along this route had reached 4,500 vehicles per day. Given the capacity of the route (9,500 vehicles per day)-'this. means that an totesss capacity.'of approximately 5000 vehicles per day, remains if both phases of this project are developed, an additional 48 trips day would be added to N.C. B . •' „}: Rail service is not available at this st.t ; • Y .1 ffY- € ... Vii... . 1 . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . .. ' . 01 F., . . - . . • — -- _ —--- ... l' .. . .. --. i $ ..' et 43? • k ...• .'l'I C)• 3H* '123' I 54C, i6a *ect e , .., \ / .. ... ,. • r / " . 2•53A - V\- 1 A t ',. .... c)20art ., 5 AC. 1 \ .., .... INN: i t . • , . . n , .......1...V. tt . iv t t., 1.% • .. i SAC. .... I., 't arrZ a 3 AC. • t t - ,., . 34C. • .\\.\.) ; ... ., -... pu --- (...g 69" < . • . , I.; C) 5ieilt• t ;1' 'EST aa • ,_ .. .62427 AC r I . . •,.rAf. ......-..' • ....--- . 134' Cr.C,1.55 ..•-rr...:•"-*.ir• .t -O." .. . • ._,............_....., ........ i . . ..„.. . .;..„ , . , ..a. ' .2: ‘. pig zok•r.•Act AC. .,.:' Q!!) . —. . .... 446. $092 ., ....t.- t 1 5 , - ._......... ...... ...VI. ,3'359i 4.6.8SAC'• ....\-: t t i ......—. ..... .... \ .19. ,......._rz....74. 4 .......... ........... -- ..._ -t....k.1.4ttalrj ant co-ROADVAIr • tor ow mac=swoop 0 . 1 talut.ftcha. DA: 0.331.teedT3 WAS WM ■ vs-ReArort . . , , Mien MAtater11510Itt,t)Will ... . .. • ' . I • «minni....-.. .. ' . . . .. . , . . .,.. . ' . , . ■ . . . „ • . , 026 _ - -- • - APPLICATION EOM CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION • ,. DATEbay j54_3 I- 911.3 The-Honorable Board of County Counrissioners- " Orange County, North Carolina 2016IISSIONEES:. - ...._it The undersigned request that property located an Tax. Map Number : Block. number ---- ,, Lot numberP/0 28 , Shown on'the accompanying plat, Agi.cul — wtrich is presently in art .Residezrbial. . iii.strict be rezoned to P.D. — T.ndustrial . for the following reasons: r inlo. •r••• •- •ary '- • - -• .JP 3 '• - • :- z:: 0 L-.1A•• -a - MO. - irtu-t .2.c_tiztitv node, bv the aslotrted land use •Z. Access to the .. • •e , is- • o•osed to be directly on the an arteri — .. . ..._ .. 3 The 1=0'00- --- - . e •1 *• *III 11110 . $ •- o- ow me -a — riz • - 4". --- .._ the industrial— I Zoning District . 4-.The •lanned develo•ment deer,u ation will • d vide • otection for he existin- ad'acent residenti:_ __e- whi - - •v "• -_ • - . - ./. .,,- .t I • the • •-c- , f r an industrial use. . - • Signed: Address: ,. • ,.....cr r4qtrjw,L-) . . Rt. Box 8 Hillsborough N.C. 2 278 , - . wen.. . • - . REZONING MgUEST CHUCKLI5T s tti;ye wen N AUIIIt88S !WbOr � 27,278 To 1 umber of Acrej 5� CUFV#At JA#?4 t40 Woodland- Pasture � rrapt zonin AR TO n + I pe of rezoydn$ xeques�ed P.D. _ 7ndUajri pro P0 ,04, ► Vq$ Food Proaeaein � map tBlock .._ .'�, umber s �P/(1 28 Fxao�edt�plyl '►bigs— r-t- s�4ua}u �► i ' diyidunl_ X _ Prnased�gugg Trasme � 'u 1 c Caq �y Ittvdu .-. ? _ a�tk _ _ icess onto Mats rand 0 •_Hr. 86 Average 444Y-44440 0vo PC 00 wV4 road oo Atll' RX41 4� litiaal ara4al Flood gone 4FP.4p NONE , Y°Q IY d #►p {4 a N01' ' Streams NONE NONE iscribe land uses iA; General ftga t ti i Tidugtr4l I jacent par+ceia of land !ra district Orein e RUrgl 4 - 0 2 2 . NOTICZ OF APPEAL TO ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OR =MIST SPECIAL USE. PERMIT " Notice is hereby giveb the Board'of Adjustment and the Zoning- Officer of an appeal frour the- ruling of the zoning Officer on the . day of , 19- , which ordered that " ' . , - or r request a Special Use Permit as provided for in Section A/R/9" ...... eqr PI ani_21. D ze1nmenta- . I . . ......--.7.-....... ...... premise z. lccatert on N.C.. 86: Hilisborowth. l'OuRIShir. Dear sm1332., 1 said premises being 'thla the area of jersidiction of the, Zoning Ordirmricer far.6. tt 2arel - County as applied to Sill and Eno Township-s,. adopted by the Orange- County Board of C=missioner Tit1 e. for i•Fit% properity is in the namef Khye Werig. Ng land. .." .-,:, vriff% Sum* CITFarttir • • The grounds. for this appeal are as folio-'.wsz — . • S. • . • • . - :..., • . 31.3.17 /1, 1c)83 Date %I'L•illalii _ Signature • ,..:-pel.Lant R :• . : • - - ..: • :. k I Address- LE title to. above-menioned property is not in the name of the applicant and appeal is on behl/•F of such p1 roperty, attach a letter frost the owner signifying his approval.. 1 Apnea'. must be acoompiiied by a small scale vicinity map, showing exact location of of property with respect to existing streets, street numbers and size of lots, nature of adjacent property Uses,. and other important features, within and contiguous to the property. The names of the owners of all lots within 300 feet in al.]. directions from the property will be shown.. 7 . 1 . • . . . ' . • O2a The applicants have far-the past several years pradnced a. sweet and sec=sauce-whicir they have made and packaged out at makeshift facili-W.es. They feel. that the business ia now strong enough to rrant expansion which in turn wil1.1require a,ei ffererch,faesaitr. Zx-Prallesett that 5.03 acres be rezoned to Planned Development-Indus- twist. Therplart to bail&a metal building on a: concrete slab. There will ,probably be four naployees. Canstructicat of,the building will start with- at the issuance at the Special- _Tree Permit and be completed wilthirr sin months- Phase Ir would probably be started within five to eight years after Phase-r is completed.. The eortsting vegetation should usually screen the bui7ef1rIc from N.C. t16 except for the area far the graveled:parking. The sign for the project shall not exceed 32 square feet and shall,meet-the requirements of Article Mine. The parking-area is proposed to be grave-led along with the access drive. Sightl distances in bath directions from the tit-I:may are good. The azaoutt of land distributing activity at the site lair. be kept to a niniment,, only the area.far sewage drain Lines- bui7dire,. parking sad de Ittrerr Wirt be cleared. An such activity will:be done In accordance ;eith, Orange Counti regulations. The buildings (both phases) win be MX 4,5r mar phase would. have 3150 square feet for a-total of 6307 square- feet of floor area.. The Zoning' Ordinance won ld.allow uP, to a nazi= of 15,770 square feet. The food. pro- cessing activity will not create any significant mounts of wastes. Those wastes created will be disposed of like restaurant wastes in the- Coturty land- Relation to Major Ttanspottation Facilities (SEE FINDINGS) Relation to Public Utilities, Facilities, and Services (SEE FINDINGS) Physical Character of the Site and Relation to Surroundint. Properties (SEE FINDINGS) • • • 024 • • +rope "J. Description Peg at a.paint at the intwsectiact of the soathern right of war-of SEC 1.332 ands the west=right at wag of N,C. 86 thence:in a souther- I,y &read S 1r-1-41 —53' " S a.distance of 765.811 to a. pair*, thenae- art a southerly-direction: S 761-13' - 1461,-1,1; a distance of 2UT•32.' to a. P�rtr thence;.Liz a northerly-direction Erie-14' -53" ' a distance. of 75.8.85r to a pasta*fir the right:of w y of SS 1332', thence in a.northerly. dfrecti=S[ 7G¢-38' -!t2" E a eat 2E37.63' to the paint and place of begiuning.t. Treat described contains a total.. of $.03 acres. • • 1 025. . • r • ittrl jr wj� '7_...,.W 4 �•'.YM1 1 •7{i. +1Y 'F 'IF"'.�^.i,.•::. :i it - ...`1.1".I: , 71-1:12,—:-.11-,,,,./L,_ Nth II I ..�M>( gl ; r is• lit t i E i,... 4 1 • is 4vr „1 :.=.,..c001r- c-; -• "s • "W. $' • i_'l�-.S..,wC'.'I. y.ew,«`y,.p. .':.i f}���}�r, t'.' ,,,•b +",�•- .. • '`.'F•r-k741., "2-1:-..--t.r.q,!.; Xr.t..7:'Ztiarf. -.,.......*::0-ii.,11`rpf..;4• " -.--;.1,7--,•:;*,1/4" , i .&=".--.1, iwal ; ','+1 a +'t: =:L ik:t=1, rt. }tI•^ .4 'At '" a r'N{: :s fir. y w` '<.a...•sr:iu ",t"9-if c w .......,...,..0.0,,:„:"1:::. , . ..t `r`i =; N .c.; W ec` .'!ar" ,• r fir` ..: ::..,-,,...7, •1 ,1...,1, :-'•:7,-,;;;71./.;-..;;;.%..;:ir.44,..•-•nr.f...../.10.ei';', . 1 .j • •46 ., •ar!" ya".~•7b'! .w4.... , • :�'r,,. '"� . it ' ' i-:`•�'" »a.s '�t- =+_" rtn',. ti : a-,`: ., :" • •t.y.- .r$ c --.4, t .:Y "s".i--iwLx�r _ ' -,2 r„,, +• . ► : .: � y c,-. F »y.,�� .+, 'a �� n � • X ! , fin-- aK1. .14..,.14..,11..'" a tit, i'.."... ...1: 144... t, .: e'! 7 `:c .r L.�• .• q.�M...' 3 ,":S�•Vh y: F.. .5i•..."�r�.ar v!;° -=w4 ,M tM µ y _ • .1:':-.r ? :.,.x.� + .�7. LtS�"; 'a'M"," n..i,,.' ;: i"; tiMh +'U. „ra r.:..'"-,•••,, ..: •• '1. y.,,• m y• :;+"i+° ".�t•.+..G.<.•+ r-,,'•`.";.�fr•'"^^»''�-._M ..7..w";.,=,".2....t.ws�+3+¢w. r=.`.;k,--1 -,37-...r.. ` ^.t ^ .:-...z.: ,. ` ., r .r•• "`eL. mo•; -'cc--;rt"Fi:"E^c S s t.-. • ., .; ,.... rs fi.., 'Y••c' %y „, }4 ' i . , /. n ; _ '.rg. , mt,-� k's: I ,r. • •„ ,i;; jrt.," w . t ,;!rptiy , ' t.,..=-- :' ';rA. .: ;r- Ste, . ' - v .•,. .-s r.. —.. aµ.. ., . ,1 ,4.0-P r t ' = W '^X wC IwS�C { '„x' �• cwa .a Y _••�+==r` •:� aaF^am _ "�'•= ' •'! r.7'.1 F SK .+.r? t. »: `';•, •-"'..r ::..`:.":'?..:'-R' i•: .!+E--.. .•,.•.'t?t• .+. . ,P. .. ; r'-'t .r '''F..___.,:,:!:.:.-.4-';4.Z , ..,5i , e• , . , _7. ` : i w •4....r' ` • ' : ~ ?:*-- .rMi.- .J.;4 !Ttn.�•E•L'tir.;wt..::' .:wty : •r C.• •'er ryamU` .r' - .,-w•.. '_ .y.„v 7"r-.' r3 aP 4i - ; ' ' .irr ': -. - .r , -ww .. rr`. .. . / .. . PRANGE COU • B0Al2D OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGE 1 ACTION AGENDA ITEM-ABSTRACT ITEM NO..E-1 MEETING:DATE,•Qctobef•..3,--, iQS3 , 026 I ' SUBJECT: Follow-4p Information- to Manager's August 16, 1983. Affirmative Action Report DEPARTMENT: County Manager PUBLIC HEARING: YES X NO ATTACHMENT(S): 1 INFORMATION. CONTACT: County Manager's X501 1. Percent Increase by Category Office of Employee Chart PHONE NUMBERS:. HILLSBOROUGH - 732-8181 2. Distribution of Employees by HILLSBOROUGH 732-9361 EmP y y CHAPEL. HILL - 967-925 1 Salary Grade MEBANE - 227-2031 DURHAM - 688-7331 PURPOSE: To respond to questions of the Board regarding analysis of employment salaries. The-Report sets forth the steps taken by the Board since 1976 to ensure that the County's personnel actions are based on the principle of merit. Board interest was in seeing an employment breakdown of race and sex by salary grade assigned. Attached are two summaries. One is the trend from when data were first gathered in July 1,. 1976 to August 31, 1983. The second. is a sub Dart showino the data from approval of the 1981 Affirmative Action Plan (February, 1981) to August 31,. 1981. - Breakdown �for protected classes is as follows: E 1976-1983 Percentages of Increases Decreases otal otal Overall Non-Minority Minority Male Females Non-Supervisory (Grade- 49-61) 90.6 46.3 184.0 132.0 58.3 Middle Management (Grade 62-71) 138.2 105.9 550.0 100.0 187.5 Upper Management (Grade 72-87) 257.1 200.0 400.0 250.0 300.0 1981,1983 Percentages of Increases/Decreases Total Overall Non-Minority Minority Total Male Females Non-Supervisory (Grade 49-61) 0.66 -2.9 6.0 5.4 -2.1 Middle Management (Grade 62-71) ,10.0 7.1 23.8 9.7 9:5 Upper Management (Grade 72-87) 19.0 10.5 100.0 40.0 -33.3 The 1976 to' 1983 figures taken as a trend show significant progress in moving toward a wokfo rce that reflects a balance of protected classes of employees. Period from' 1981 to 1983 reflects further gain in minority hiring but a decline in females at the non-supervisory and upper management levels. To view the last two years as indicative of a general trend would refute the progress reflected in dates for the longer period. As opportunities for hiring and promotion became available, any declines in protected category can be taken into account. , This is the essence of affirmative action to balance employee class representation without sacrificing quality of work force. RECOMMENDATION(S): Authorize follow-up on the recommendations included in the Progress Report of the Managerof August 16, 1983, and stated in the Commission for Women's April, 1983 , Affirmative Action. Report, which are: 1. DeveIbp departmental goals:. 2. Provide training to supervisors with regard to affirmative action. 3. Evaluate the EEO/AA achievements of all management and supervisory personnel as part of his/her overall job performance. 4. Continue to improve the recruitment and selection process. Validate testing instruments annually. 5. Establish and keep active an applicant pool of minority and female candidates for selection referral. The applicant pool will greatly assist departments in which there is an under-representation of minorities and/or women. 6. Implement routine, periodic reporting. procedures to include an annual report to the Commissioners as specified by the 1981 Affirmative Action Pla 7.. Publish for public: distribution an annual report of our progress by Jane 30th of each year. I� Ct2 O PERCENT INCREASE BY CATEGORY OF EMPLOYEE s 1976-83 8Y RACE by SEX PAL FEMALES TOTAL. NON-MINORITY mitioNtY HALE FEMALE W14 M/H W/F MIF '76 '83 % '76 '83 % '76 '83 176 '83 A '76 '83 %A_ '76 '03 % '76 '83 %A '76 '83 %/\, '76 '83 N-S 85 153 90.6 67 98 46.3 18 53 194.0 25 58 132 60 95 59.3 19 36 89.5 6 22 266.7 48 62 29.2 12 33 55 13i 138.2 51 105 105.9 4 26 550.0 31 62 100.0 24 69 187.5 28 50 78.6 3 12 300.0 23 55 139.1 1 14 1 04 7 25 259.1 7 21 200.0 0 4 400.0 6 21 250.0 1 4 300.(3 6 19 216.7 0 2 290.0 1 2 100.0 0 2 TOTAL. 147 309 110.2 125 224 79.2 22 Q5 286.4 52 141 127.41 85 169 97.6 53 105 98.1 9 36 300.0 72 119 65.3 13 49 PERCENT INCREASE BY tATEGORY OF EMPLOYEE 1981-D3 N-S 152 153 .66 102 98 (2.9) 5O 53 6.0 55 58 5.4 97 95 (-2.1) 36 26 (27.8) 19 22 15.8 66 62 (6.1) 31 33 MM 119 131 10.1 98 105 7.1 21 26 23.0 56 62 OJ 63 . 69 93 46 50 (0.7) 10 12 20.0 52 55 5.8 11 14 UM 21 25 19.0 19 21 10.5 a 2 4 100.0 15 21 40.0 6 4 W.3) 14 19 35.7 1 2 100.0 5 2 (0-0) 1 2 TOTAL 299 309 5.8 210 224 2.3 73 85 1243 126 141 11.9 166 168 1.0 96 105 9.4 30 36 20.0 123 114 (1 2) 43 49 COdtsi N-S = (tot►-Supervitory (office cleric6li servlc6 maintenance, protectiVe servlees) MM = Middle Management (paraproressiodalt protesslonalt technicians) U14 - Upper Management (Department and 01413ion heads) W/M A lthite Male W/F Milte Female M/M d Minority Male M/F Minority Female ©=`percent Change 4 4 r-r"- -. ...A�j r /ti. :-:'4 T.iVt.,i,t' i- .1_,C• " • _; L , ... - Z r „s,E_'!�?ter .&,••-.0,4,-;:X.,-”,::�r[t?. l'.u•-:� i-i:rz 1 n`fi-y 1! •., ti.w .r ";i t•. su r•� '' : " �:;Fwti`y„ _ ..a`.::�.r��ty�.��sr.r..l�L,r . :y-";.�,�= i- fawt•t -'„`-4r r,: � :^ --TEAR: T98- j • SALARY GRADE AVERAGE TOTAL' i gF1�1ALc5 j SALARY II$PLOYEES . NON-MINORITY MINORITY M/M® Mi 3 ©©© 2 MIIII Mill IIncZassified 7,368 8. 49 NMI MEI= 50 52 11111111111111111111111111111111111 53 8,429 4 4 IIIIIIIIIIEIIIIIIIIII/IIIMIIII • ' j � 54 11,p74 5 ' 55 9,997 8 ©IIIII 5 55 E 10,417 24 20 © . 24 70. 4 5T 8.573 3 1 © I_ 2 1 1-, 1 5R 12.567 I 3 1 1 1 59 - 11,691 33° 22 , S 1 8 © 14 7 ” = 60 12,502 22 14 8 `�� 4 61 13,069 43-( - 30-` 13 30 5 62- 14592 3 22'1 �� 5 63 15,273 17 1111 11111 1 - 54 — 3 65 15,969- 6^ �� 1 66 ' 16,180 30 24 6 3 67 16,726 17 :11= 6 �rin© 4 9 B 1 ' 1 68 20,331 69 W .. 19,098 8 7 1 II 70y �_ 19� , _883_ � 2 2 • ® � 'B•. — t-. ..r_ 20,569 �� 72 . 22,725 4— 3 1 ©� 22,345 5 , - 2 3 � 2 _ 74 M 3 311111111 111 75 26,918 3 3 N 76__-__ ,27.330 - 2 1 , 1 1 '` i 77 29,925 1 1 1 --- 1 1 1 78 35,767 3 3 MI -.. IIIIIIMEZ1111 28,565 1 _ 1 . --- 80 33,781 2 2 2 1111 87 � 1 . 1 s .7 27 PCZ? ' s4.V 3't'`l, 1 3s% t� TOTALS P 09) 224 85 141 166 iD5 36 119 4�: CODES: O "' W/M -- White Male �^'> ,,�u+" W� - White Female p 5 MJM - Minority Male 1 ©`� " - M/'F - Minority Female _ _ __ - .�'''7g3441+; �� , . •• • 1 • . .••' .. - .. •,1:,..,.,...-•., .0.-'7'-''.1,-..;.n.',''''..' "•:■.*i.;1.4Ei.z:;,1%.•..:-',,,1,' V...-:-^- ;,dlit.:.•,'.v.'' '.=.:4".`.f.,;•.,:o' ..4.;,'..;.::,.. L,;.:r.t:...-p.:?:-:::: .'-:6.-,..1"4:,. ..",r: 1 . Lif`;.261.7i .,:t4:1'1.:!S-kialtit,i'. 4,754::..i4i:;t:wv,-;',„ ij174....,,, , ,,,...,e'• ::,rAt.;F.td.P!,, ,Z.,:t."•*Tr.:,-, :::,....^;,.7.;.,-.:"r,o,;-z.,',,-f*,,H.,,.,:,.,J.r^47;,;,?;-,:zr,,7^:'1,-,:;,-:.7.-17,;,;;;;"S-: ,.• ' ''''-",;`-e:'•Y ''''''',1:7,; ,,s...kOr:41'.411"4771ri-45,T,',4 -.T7.---":":::','rt.:.r.:: -:::::''-',4:-"1:I'V'':'.'"; ' ' 't:'''''' "' - _ . :1. - . . '.... .-...:.",, ,,=,::• , .-^"...%.::.;......4Y-:..7. • 7 •, ." . . ''- 58 ... : • ,, ..... •'... , • . . ! . 1 .. YEAR: 1981 •1 — .---...... . **..., SUMMARY . ' SALARY GRADE AVERAGE 'TOTAL: . y) 11111111111=111111 ljan maNam SALARY EMPLOYEES 1ga NON-MINORITY MINORITY GM FEMAL gramiDra 1 1 Unclassified 7,218 1111111 1111.111311111 1111111011111111111111111111 49 11illimi minirmor 50 " 1111111111 111111 A No 52 9,204 NM 11111 1111 , I I 53 7,958 • '1 _ 1111111111M-1111/11111 S• - ;, . 9,699 • I 1 * - _Lt_ Irli MIMI ':•1 :—...— 1 — , 2.1 . . . ..n'i 1 9,612 , 2 :'15 . 2 2' 1 • . ' ' 53 1 13,552 B :.i: - 4 * . I__ 4 ..... _ 7 4 3 1 1 1 - ------ 59 w10,674. 22 kA7V .. 16 . , 6- . '' 4 18 111111111111M ! 60 11,563 25 20 nal 20 11111111= 5 . . . . ' . , 61 11 32/ 1 2* :. ral 10 WI=III .._„.....- 62 13,652 23 . , ., 19 ' a I 1 2 63 12,723 17 14, 9 2 S 14,433 7 6 II" 1 . ,.. , ...--- , . . . . . s!. 65 14,061 14 11 5 2 66 )," ..:.,1 • 14,785 29 ' 23 0 2 . • 67 18 _,623 a 6 4 2 — .. •. 68- 18,176 11 II _ . 2 11 i I i VIII 69 16,036 3 , •%---:..1 17,644 ' 3 . 3 - -' I. . fl 71 17,622 .4'. > ! •3 ilitmelinIMINIE . '-. - . 1 72 20 460 1111111111111 73---- ---1-----lialMINIMICIIIIIIIIM :20,484. MI- . •. . 74 23,022 4 111111111M111111111 75 24,168 2 MU 1 _ 1 76 —175,908 1 . 1 1 1 1 — • -- 77 I 27,132 I 1 . 1 1 1 78 29,178' 4 4 3 1 I ...,. -- . 79 29,796 1 1 1 80 .1 31,284 1 . . 1 1 676 1 ---. . 1 NMI L TOTALS 292 ' 219 73 126 166 1111 30 4'3 _ - *** • CODES: 1.7/M - White Male wrE• - White ram..le . . .. 1111111 vim. - Isinority Male . 7 'VP - Minority Fenale I -.-: - .A. . ,.. • . ,:.:;•?.:1...:::.: .., ..-'7 ' . ... ;::-...: . . ...._.• -- .. . r Hs s �y � r ! w • Kr'''''" . :: A 6� ves : h X►? IN: ...r ' w :,4 / tr + :Th 4 .j. ;;.s a %r . + r a _. I . Y . • TEAR: MARC3 1976 *** .., '.- SUMMARY' .SALARY GRADE AVERAGE 'TOTAL' BY RACE __ MALES 1110120 SALARY EMPLOY= NON-MINORITY' MINORITY FEMALE WPM I ;; Unclassified 5.222 6 1111111 11111111� 49 5:040 3 50 6,168 2 2 ^ _ 52 5,784: 2. 1 1 _ ..� 53 5,331 11 81111 1 55 6.435 4 4 4 I . 1 13 So 6.441 17 13. I 4 i �� 5" 7,752 t -1-----1 i ,z 3 9 3 ! ' 58 8;127 12.': 54 :,-"I;;511" _ ,". 5 ���3 4 2 2 60 8,450 + 6t 8,378 16: ',14 - „____.t._ �� 62 , 10,504- 9 6 3 63 9,913 X13 12 1 8 4 1 i.,_, ._... 64 ,----,454 8 8 8 65 ___. 66 10,775 ..17 . .. 17 14 67 11,892 1 1 68- 13,264 5 5 . 4I 70 13,146 2 2 . El lin — Illa • III 72 14,052 . 1 1 73 74 .. ..• 18,886 1 1 1111/1111 75 17,052 1 1 \ 1 • 76 15,624 , . 1r 1 1 i �...,._. i ,....—.,—,„........-..„„„ INIS 1 78 imumii....1 80 18,408 2 2 �. ._-. .... • 11111111111U111111111 „ 87 22,836 ., 1 1 TOTALS 125 125 22 11:1111111111 911111 I: CODES: W/t3 -- White Male I W/F .- White Female M/M - Minority Male . M/F Minority Female - _ ------,- iii41 P 1a1 ORANGE COUNTY .` ' `� ���{� ` ^ • • BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ` ' ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NU' E-Z ' ' MEETING DATE nr�nxp' �_����- _ 031' | ' .'� SUBJECT: Department of Children's Services . . ' ' -___-__ ----- � IC HEARING: YES X �O ! IDEPARTMENT: County Manager PUBL .` -___--__' ------- r---------- � .i| cou ext. 500 i�L ATTACHMENT(S): ^"'"~~'^~'' ''�-� ' PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH - 732-8181 ` Yes HILLSBOROUGH 732-936' ` CHAPEL HILL 967-9251 ` MEBANE - 227-2031 -) DURHAM - 688-7331 . ^ __.... . 7y pU �032� To consider what steps would be necessary to establish s a Department of Children's Services. showed` NEED: Most of the Board's comments at the September ~ a preference ` for creating a new county department (Model' #3), independent of the Department of Social Services, to deliver enhanced children's services. Two questions were 1..;"' posed to be answered at this meeting. First, where Would the agency be housed? . . Serondly, who would provide the approximately $36,600 in additional funds necessary to support the new department? ••, Location and Space ., ,^ � Existing staff consisting of three positions (� supervisor, Dm social workers, '" - and 1 coordinator) occupy three offices at Grady Brown n (37h sq. ft.) and share �- half an office, half time, at Northside (80 sq. ft.). In addition, two additional offices at ( 220 sq.ft.) Grady Brown are used for storage purposes. Space options 1. Continue to lodge the department in the existing three offices in ' ^ and the office in Northside that is used for eligibility Grady Brown un e u ce n ' determination. At such time as the two additional positions are � provided for 'enhancement further assignment. of spaces will be nec- �'- ~ssury, The possibility of enclosing part of the 12 foot hallway is ~ -T provide in the D�S area falls short of creat- � � being explored. To rov � sPo�e n point raised in ': ''' ing a separate identity through space assignment, a pu ra sem � �| the Child. Care Report of the HSAC. of Children's Services the office on East ' � 2. Have the Department n occupy; ' ^ in Hillsborough wh1�h will be vacuted by CETA in Out�ber. '� n King Street , '. One thousand square feet are available. � � � . `� Non-Cnunty Cost Support . An additional $36,500 is t h e estimate for the Department p^rtment to function with addition- t if has to be rented apart from what is al st�ff, This figure would bodgr�uter »paceMjasael Sharp wjll report at the m*eti' now u�nupied at Gr�dy 8r«w» un Northside. u''t for Michael the estimated additional funds ' • � on his progress to secure letters of comittment e required. ��'� • • ') Further steps having to do with implementation include: . Enabling Ordinance A draft ordinance patterned after the creation of the Department on Aging is at- tached for consideration. T h e County Atto rney is s till researching the ordinance and possible contract provisions that would apply between DSS and the new county 8 department.. Timetable, Two view��� ^'" t on timing and sequencing. One is to create th e department, appoint t Iii. ` the .-- --^ board and possibly hire a director in January to prepare for full upe r' - '''' department July 1, 1984. Advisory Board activity between this Fall and July wouldinc l daod - �ur th e d epa rtment's acceptance, solicitation of funding and the establishment of short and long range goals for the department. Another view is that establishment of the agency and appointment of the Board ' members be postponed until start-u • can coincide with the new budget year of July 1, 1984. This would avoid problems with cost of space prorations, account separation, - � ' budget amendments, indirect cost plans and audits. � ' ^ `| ` � -I _ Wit DSS and others, . 032 secure comMitment of funds and do other steps necessary for implementation. ComMitments for operating funds from non-county sources should be for at least three years to give the agency continuity of operation. 1444ik, 591 ' "~� - 033 ~ . . � AN � ORD^ NCE AND RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH COUNTY�^1 THE ORANGE DEPKRTMEN7 OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES AND TO CREATE THE ORANGE COUNTY ,|K CHILDREN'S COUNCIL .*fl '. NH EREAS, O range County deems it appropriate to meet the special needs of families with young children by establishing an Orange County Department t of Children's Services �d creating a Children's Council in order to coordi- nate, develop and improve child care delivery and parent education and support services to Orange County's young children and their families; IT IS NOW THEREFORE ordained and resolved by the Board of County Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina as follows: -' / ` - ARTICLE J. CHILDREN'S COUNCIL SECTION 1. CREATION, NAME, COMPOSITION OF THE COUNCIL. � ' There 1s hereby created an Orange County Children's Council l cumposed of nine citizens of Orange County. Each member of the Council shall be a d County Board resident appointed by the Orange County of Commissioners. The Children's Council shall include: r�.`/| A representative of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, a representative of North Carolina Memorial Hospital, an early child- hood professional, a representative of industry, a consumer of child care service-S., and four additional representatives of urban and rural parts of Orange County. ar terms, but no of the Children's " Members o e oren'� Co�ncil shall serve tnree~ya�n Cuuncil member may serve more than two consecutive three-year terms. In order to es d t establish a uniform staggered-term structure for the � each Children's Council whereby some members' terms will expire eac year, ~ — ���N ' 592 � . . . , . . 034 , � !! '. \ - - Commissioners shall initially appoint three persons �`�� � the Board of Cuupty s . .| to a one-year term, three persons to a two-year term and three persons to a three-year term. All subsequent appointments for each such member or successor shall be for three year terms. - ] ' The Children's Council shall adopt By-Laws for the conduct of its ^'� of appropriate officers and the setting of � z business including the selection a|p negu]arly scheduled meetings. Children's Council meetings shall be held in '...' compliance with the Open Meetings Law, N. C. Gen. Stat. S143-318.1 et. seq. � shall serve without monetary compensation. ���� Children's Council members < Consistent with general policies of Orange County, Council members may be re1m- ' -,`` ` bursed for travel and subsistence for attending meetings, conferences and • ! workshops. SECTION 2. POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE CHILDREN'S COUNCIL _ A. The Council shall serve as a liaison between the young children and ' . their families of Orange County, and the County government. ` ' B. The Council shall serve as the advisory body for the Orange County ' . . `� -o'epurtmon t of Children's Services. The Council shall suggest policy uns to the Department, and the Board of County and make recommendations ". ~... .,.'• � a] needs of children, particularly with �ommY�s�onors on the open ne� � , ' ' respect to the needs for a comprehensive, integrated approach to the � coordination, development and improvement of child care delivery, parent education and support services for children. However, no . " prnQraso ur y�rv �es delivarad shull be duplicative or overlap with these provided by other tounty agencies. The Children's Council Shbll make every effort to cooperate with other county agencies on '� the development of programs and provision of services. . : | . . 1111 ^ 0��- - r - . . v.` C. The Council shall work to stjmu7ate. an d promote needed services .�� and programs for children. D. The Council shall assist public, private, and voluntary organiza- tions children.tfunu in providing services to children. � and make recommendations concerning service E. The Board shall review an ma e r proposals and funding of services that have an impact on children. `-` F. The Council shall consult with and assist the Director of the Department of ` t f Ch�ldren's Services in the preparation of the aUency n \ � budget. G. The Council shall review the proposed budget of the Department of � Ch1ldren's Services prior to the time the Agency's budget is submitted u -! | to the County Manager. Thereafter, the Council may advocate the needs of the Department nf�Ch1ldren/s Services txthe Board of County Comxissione • H. The Council shall assist the Director of the Department of Children's Sorvinms in prioritizing and implementing the goals of enhanced children's services as recommended by the HSAC Child Care Subcommittee Report. I. The Council shall perform other functions and duties as may from time to time be requested and prescribed by the Board of County Commissioners, ARTICLE II. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES ' ' SECTION 2. CREATION OF THE ORANGE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES There is hereby created t d a Department to be known as the Orange County Department of Children's Services, which shall function directly under the County Manager. SECTION 2. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES POWERS AND DUTIES The neoartment of Children's Services shall: I ' ^ . ^ . 594 . , ��. | . . - ____ - - ' . . .. . � and evaluate County programs and policies with ' A. Plan, coordinate an eva ''�� , respent to needs nf children, I 8. Cooperate with local, state and federal agencies on program � funding and develop. — ' ' C. Negotiate contracts with public, private and voluntary organi— " i s to children. ' ' z� o fors �m - � � �i D. Serve generally as an advocate in promoting the health and �' ' welfare of the children of Orange County. E. Administer those funds for purchase of day care and program ikti � administration provided by the Orange County Department of '' ' Social Services through an annual contract which sets forth ''� ` the terms and responsibilities for handling these funds. '. SECTION 3. DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES The position of the Director of the Department of Children's Services is hereb created. He shall be the chief administrative officer wf the Department of ' Children's Services and shall be a Department Head reporting directly to the '| : . ` Orange County Manager. . The position p f the Director of the Department of:Children`s Services shall be filled pursuant to and in compliance with the Orange County Personnel Policy. •- Personnel as may be deemed necessary to the supervision, operation and maintenance of the Department of Children's Services programs and services d shall be employed and discharged in accordance w ith the Personnel Policy of the ` � �` County. . . SECTION 4. POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN'S SERVIC The Director of the Department of Children's Services shall: A. Serve as secretary to the Children's Council. ji .. • ' 1111N ' ~ ^ ~,.~ , . . _ _ -_- -__ . _- ! , . | '''��` B. Administer programs and services established for the Department. | t C. Appoint and supervise departmental personnel consistent with the ~ Orange County Personnel Policy. ` D. Administer funds appropriated to the Department through the County's and administer funds provided through other funding �| ' budget process ^ ) sources in accordance with approved polices of Orange County. E Have such other powers and duties as are necessary for the npera- | E. :1' tion of the Orange County Department of Children's Services. A complete description d i un for the position of the Director of the Department of Children's Services shall be devised by Orange County. The Children's Council defining th� dut1es mn6 responsibilities of recommendations further shall make reuonmsn the �� the Director of the Department of Children's Services. �� Services. ' This ordinance and resolution s hall be in full force and effect on lgO3, after having been adopted according to the law by the Orange Board m B d � Commissioners. . A6opted this �9D�day of --� 1983. . � ' ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS / BY ` ----7OFard E. woIzreo, ` Attested to: | I]�rk tn t�e Board of Commissioners of Orange County | \ / ' lii -7/97h, 107 Walters Rd. Carrboro, N. C. 27510 September 22, 1983 Mr. Richard Whitted, Chairman Orange County Beard of Commisioners +Orange County Courthouse E. Margaret Lane Hillsborough, 2,4 C. 27278 Dear Mr. Whitted, I am writing to you to let you know that I favor strongly the formation of the Child Care Coordinating Agency that is currently under consideration. Also, I definitely prefer option three, the formation of the Agency as a private non- profit corporation. Under no circumstance would I favor putting the Agency under the administration of the Department of Social Services, since the Agency is intended to serve all segments of the community. If placed under the Department of Social Serviles, the Agency will appear to many people to be for indigent clients only, and to others who might know otherwise, they might not use the Agency simply because it is associated with DSS and they prefer to avoid the stigma of the lied of some service offered by DSS. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Co -J1( (11-)PalA Camille W. Porto, M. D. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA 0CTI8NAGEND& ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM MEETING. DATE 596 038 October 3 ._l�R3 SUBJECT: Animal Control ` ` ' --------- , N� PUBLIC HEARING: YES- IMPARTMENT: Health \ ---' -�--- -- ------- ATTACHMENT(S) : --- ----' INFORMATION CONTACT: Commissioner Wfllhoi l^ Summary of Amendments J—' ' n^hi snn Y211 2. Proposed Animal Control Ordinance w PB8NE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH 732-8181 HILLSBOROUGH ~ 732-9361 3~ Summary of Comments and Suggested CHAPEL HILL - 967-9251 Animal Control Ordinance Amendments -- MEBANE - 227-2031 | ~~ in Response Hereto DURHAM -@B-733l } ~ " / PURPOSE:' In 1 the mses of this ordinance are to def'ine and prohibit the miciaabuse of ~'''--'-; establish define and remedy nuisance pro bl ems that are dangerous or prejudicial / to public health, property, and livestock; to remedy th e emission o f noises `. . that annoy or frighten citizens; to regulate, restrict, or prohibit the in in such keeping of strays; to prevent dogs from going at large and o manner as, to maintain a superabundance of dogs and engaging n p ack activities; to pem/aomntly restrain vicious dogs; to establish a citizens complaint process; and, to establish civil' fines for violation of the ordinance. NEED: Numerous citizens are bitten each persons sustain serious injury �v requiring hospitalization) ; the Animal (some Officers (ACOs) of the Health ~^ ~ Department handle around 10 bite cases cases per month; dogs cause bicyclists and g motorcyclists to have accidents; in some areas jogging and other outdoor exercise is hazardous due to dogs; livestock are killed by dog packs; roaming ng dogs destroy property; citizens complain they are not able to enjoy their own yards- due to roaming dogs; the ACOS respond to about 170 citizen complaints ts ab out dogs per month in the non-incorporated areas of Orange County. Several major cases o f cruelty to ahimals are discovered each year. We lack a systema- t1ze6 effort to dYnnuvor th e true e xtent of this problem and stop such prac - . �' tices- Orange County does not now have an ordinance other than the minimal Ymal State Regulations. The State Regulations are inadequate fo r th e control of • roaming d biting dogs - often our ACO's are unable to help people due to lack of regulations. '' IMPACT: Increased safety and security of citizens and,property from animals. Provide ACO's with necessary regulations to do their jobs. ~ C) Establish an animal cruelty investiDation/prm�ent1on program.D) Minimal additional county cost but increased revenue due to fine collection, • ` [S): • Aosot the ordinance amendments. - _ '/ �. • ' ' . / '� ■ 1." „ %"'"",„'; " 5 9"r AMENDMENTS TO AN ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE FOR ANIMAL CONTROL ANI) PROTECTION IN ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA BE IT ORDAINED that the Board of Commissioners of Orange County hereby amends the Ordinance to Provide for Animal Control and Protection in Orange County, North Carolina by adding the following: Section VI. As used in this ordinance, the following terms mean: L. Adequate Feed: The provision at suitable intervals, not to exceed 24 hours, of a quantity of wholesome foodstuff suitable for the species and age, sufficient to maintain a reasonable level of nutrition in each animal. Such foodstuff shall be served in a receptacle, dish, or container that is physically clean and in which agents injurious to health are removed or destroyed, to a practical minimum. 2. Adequate Shelter: That shelter which will keep an animal dry, out of the direct path of prevailing winds and out of the direct sun. ' 3. Adequate Water: A constant access to a supply of clean, fresh potable water provided in a sanitary manner or provided at suitable intervals for the species and not to exceed 24 hours at any interval. 4. Animal: Any live, vertebrate creature specifically including but not limited to dogs, cats, farm animals, birds, fish and reptiles. 5. Animal Control Shelter: A place proVided and operated by Orange County directly or by contractual agreement, whether or not jointly with another governmental unit, for the restraint, care and disposition of animals. 6. At Large: Any animal shall be deemed to be at large when it is off the property of its owner and not under the restraint of a competent person. 7. Competent Person: A person of suitable age and discretion to t- , *'+'• ,-. 3t°'Y 4 :z :,.. < L r a rt�N„„ w. :".. ..c.69 r z%,,-r,�a y,,- .. %§. r ,-",e,s e a;N.w- �.:.'`. :. > t : ,6,?.' � ' k-k=Z;?1, ?. ∎i•"te '.', - '”. '' uC &`/. - K i 2 y , � n;.' e', k , � s, u.� .-..','.''''',,'1,-''''.,a� ss�`i, . , agir k , �>,,; 1r ..e,_... 59 � (it keep air animal under sufficient restraint dnd control in order to prevent harm to person and property. 8. Cruel and Cruel Treatment Shall be held to include every edt, omission, or neglect whereby unjustifiable physical pain, suffering, or death is caused or permitted; but such terms shall not be construed to include lawful taking of animals under the jurisdiction and regulation of the Wildlife Resources Commission, lawful activities sponsored by agencies conducting biomedical research or training, lawful activities for sport, the production of livestock or poultry, or the lawful destruction of any animal for the purpose of protecting .y. 4 .y such livestock or poultry. 9. Exposed to Rabies: An animal has been exposed to rabies within the meaning of this ordinance, if it has been bitten by, or otherwise come into contact with, any animal known or suspected to have been infected with rabies. 10. Harbor: An animal shall be deemed to be harbored if it is fed or sheltered by the same person or household for seventy-two (72) consecutive hours or more. U. Health Department: Orange County Health Department 12. Health Director: Director of the. Orange County Health Department. 13. Keeper: A person having custody of an animal or who keeps or harbors an animal or who knowingly permits an animal to remain on or about any premises occupied or controlled by such person. 14. Owner: Any person, group of persons, firm, partnership or corporation owning, keeping, having charge of, sheltering, feeding, harboring or taking care of any animal. The owner of an animal is responsible for the care, actions, and behavior of the animal. .. S! .:.': n..'. .. '.. .. .. ..'. 2 :.<�. ..'r:. . ..:,..:_. ., .dad...:. ...�d.l is „& .4Y� 59E 1 . - 15. Person: Any individual, corporation, partnership, organization, or institution commonly recognized by law as a pIrson. 16. Public Nuisance Defined: Actions Deemed Prima Facie Evidence of a Public Nuisance: The following activities of an animal or conditions maintained or permitted by the animal's owner or keeper shall constitute a public nuisance. (a) The animal is repeatedly found at large off the premises of its owner or keeper and not under the restraint of a competent person. (b) The animal repeatedly damages the property of anyone other than its owner or keeper, including, but not limited to, turning over garbage containers or damaging gardens, flowers, shubbery, vegetables or trees. (c) The animal habitually and repeatedly barks, whines, or howls. (d) The animal repeatedly chases, snaps at, or barks at pedestrians, bicycles or vehicles and is not in an enclosure, chained or on the owner's or keeper's property. (e) The owner or keeper fails to confine a female dog while in heat (estrus) in a building or secure enclosure in such a manner that she will not be in contact with another dog, nor attracting other animals; provided, this section shall not be construed to prohibit the intentional breeding of animals within an enclosed area on the premises of the owner or keeper of an animal involved in the breeding process. . I 17. Restraint: A dog is under restraint if it is controlled by means of a chain, leash or other like devise; is under direct control and is obedient to commands; is on or within a vehicle being driven or parked; or is within a secure enclosure. 18. Security Dog: Any dog used, kept or maintained on the premises I . -7-I 60C of its,owner or keeper for the purpose of protecting any person or property. Any such dog shall be further classified as patrol dog, sentry dog, or watch dog. (a) Patrol dog - A dog that is trained or conditioned to attack • or otherwise respond aggressively, but only upon command from a handler either off or on lead. (b) Sentry dog - A dog that is trained or conditioned to attack or otherwise respond agressively without command. (c) Watch dog - A dog that barks and threatens to bite any intruder and that has net been specially trained or conditioned for that purpose. 19. Stray: Any dog wandering at large or lost, does not have an owner, or does not bear evidence of the identification of any owner, or any dog whose owner, if determinable, has failed to pay for and procure a dog license tag or vaccination tag. 20. Suspected of Having Rabies: An animal which has bitten a person or another animal. 21. Veterinary Hospital: Any establishment maintained and operated by a licensed veterinarian for surgery, diagnosis and treatment of diseases and injuries of animals. 22. Vicious Animal: Any animal, security dog excluded, which constitutes a physical threat to human beings or other animals by virtue of an unprovoked attack or an attack of such severity as to cause property damage, injury or harm to a person or another animal. Section VII. The Orange County Animal Control Program, as herein described and as otherwise described in other County ordinances related to animals and as otherwise described in the law of North Carolina, shall generally : &1',tn--11t,te.4114r;figs'iVf:''t.-Z.;'A.,7!:g1.-ti'f'.3*,:-.: Tar.,g,--- --fgt'W- Ii-V-,?_.11:21'. 1i.-0.77.41. _•:.,:i,,,,,,:,, ..s.,s,..,::„',::.:„•.,,,,::',':.i:„1-,:;-"Z`30,,:.:" .',,..,.,,,.. 4, :: „",,,';',.:-, ,,..,;:::.:;„,,,.t.'2,-...7':,''', . A.',1,.;''''''„:' IP';",‘,91rt",t,L:','t,":„. '";,:,;:,i,.,''''::!,,,..s.A:+004.0..,,,.;.- 60.1 • . . 1 be administered by the Orange County Health Director. Specifically, A. The Health Director shall designate employees or agents enforcing this ordinance as Animal Control Officers and Rabies Control Officers. Animal Cruelty Investigators shall be appointed by the Board of County Commissioners as provided by law. In the performance of their duties, Officers and Investigators shall ha' e all the powers, authority, and immunity granted under b*: this ordinance and by the general laws of this state to enforce the provisions of this ordinance, and the laws of North Carolina as they relate to the care, treatment, control or impounding of animals. B. Except as may be otherwise provided by law, no officer, agent, or employee of the County charged with the duty of enforcing the provisions of this ordinance or other applicable laws, shall be personally liable for any damage that may accrue to persons or property as a result of any act required or pemitted in the discharge of such duty unless he acts with actual malice. C. It shall be unlawful for any person to interfere with, hinder, or molest any Animal Control Officer, Rabies Control Officer, Animal Cruelty Investigator, police officer, veterinarian, or other duly appointed agent while in . - the performance of any duty authorized by this ordinance or to seek to release any animal in the custody of said agents, except in the manner as herein provided. D. Animal Control Officers, Rabies Control Officers and Animal Cruelty Investigators are not hereby authorized to carry on their person firearmS of any kind except as Provided herein. The Orange County Animal Control Program may store at the Health Department or carry in departmental vehicles firearms approved for use, and use such firearms when necessary to enforce sections of this ordinance or under applicable law for the control of wild, vicious, i 1 or diseased animals. E. The employees of the Animal Control Program shall: I. Hive the responsibility along with law enforcement agencies to enforce all laws of North Carolina and all ordinances of Orange County pertaining to animals and shall cooperate with all law enforcement officers within Orange County in fulfilling? this duty. 2. Enforce and carry out all, laws of North Carolina and all ordinances of Orange County pertaining to rabies control. 3. Be responsible for the investigation of all reported animal bites, for the quarantine of any dog -or cat exposed to or suspected of having • rabies, for a period of not less than ten (10) days, and for reporting to the Health Director as soon as practicable the occurrence of any such animal bite and the condition of any quarantined animal. 4. Be responsible for the seizure and impoundment, where • deemed necessary, of any dog or other animal in Orange County involved in a violation of this or any other County ordinance or state law. 5. Investigate cruelty or abuse with regard to animals separately or with a duly appointed Animal Cruelty Investigator. 6 Make such canvasses of the county, including the homes in the county, as necessary for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with this ordinance or state statute. 7. Keep, or cause to be kept, accurate and detailed records of: (i) Seizure, impoundment, and disposition of all animals coming into the custody of the animal control program. (ii) Bite cases, violations and comOlaints, and investigation . - ••- " ? " •;.4tVr 55?-« • :" " ' ""- " . of same. (iii) Any other matters deemed necesary by the Health Director. 8. Be empowered to issue notices of violation of this ordinance in such form as the Health Director may prescribe. Section WU. Nothing in this section is intended to be in conflict with the laws of the State of North Carolina regulating, restricting, authorizing or otherwise affecting dogs while used in hunting. This section should be read and enforced consistent with any such law. Section IX. It shall be unlawful for any person who causes injury to an animal by running over or hitting the animal with any motor vehicle to fail to notify immediately any one of the following: (I) the owner(s) or keeper(s) of said animal (if known or ascertainable with reasonable efforts made to locate the owner or keeper), (2) an Animal. Control Officer, (3) the Sheriff's Department, or (4) the Animal Control Shelter. Section X. The following acts or failure to act relating to the mistreatment of animals are unlawful and violations of this ordinance: A. It shall be unlawful for any person to subject or cause to be subjected any animal to cruel treatment or to deprive or cause to be deprived any animal of adequate food and water. Depriving an animal or causing it to be deprived of adequate food and adequate water constitutes cruelty as defined in this ordinance. With respect to domesticated pets, it shall be unlawful to deprive or cause to be deprived any such animal of adequate shelter. Depriving. a domesticated pet or causing it to be deprived nf adequate shelter constitutes cruelty as defined in this ordinance. All animal cruelty investigators appointed by the Board of County Commissioners as authorized by G.S. Section 19A-45 shall : ;:- ::":—:.'' .*:J:,`"+:.".";:::— 7 .a.. - --° ° . .° ' a' -‘7—a' '''.. -:: ° ''.°,;'a.:: a •—,- a a a.,-4.• , -■'''-:,,-...''' .- -^,;''.1.- ..4 ..,f,',-=',, .^.......t;m0,....424. -,T...„rt . • .^".-.'.' ' '...' ''. ' "■. , '' ,' ' ' "-", - 4.",.." . .' ' ....."' ,:'' ' 4'''' ',-- 'e:-T':-,,,:—44",---',''',.. 'r, . '',,_,.. -..',fle•KA.,'' 604 . ., .1 t i proceed in any case involving cruelty to animals as proscribed in Article 4 of • i fl Chapter I9A of the North Carolina General Statutes. , i B. It shall be unlawful for any person to sell or offer for sale, barter or give away within the county baby chickens, baby ducklings or other fowl under - six (6) weeks of age or rabbits under eight (8) weeks of age as pets, toys, premiums or- novelties; provided, however, that this section shall not be construed to prohibit the sale or display of such baby chickens, ducklings or other fowl or such rabbits in proper facilities by breeders or stores engaged in the business of selling for purposes other than for pet or novelties. C. It shall be unlawful to color, dye, stain or otherwise change the natural color of baby chickens or other fowl or rabbits. D. It shall be unlawful for any person to tether any fowl. E. It shall be unlawful for any person to entice or lure any animal : - out of an enclosure or off the property of its owner or keeper, or to seize, . molest or tease any animal while the animal is held or controlled by its owner or keeper or while the animal is on or off the properly of its owner or keeper. F. It shall be unlawful for any person to commit any of the acts made unlawful by the provisions of G.S. 14-362, as the same relate to a dog or dogs, or to commit any other act made unlawful by any other law of the State of North Carolina relating to dog fighting or dog baiting. The repeal of such law or laws of the State of North Carolina shall have no effect upon this , Section,. and the acts herein made unlawful shall, in the event of such repeal, be those referred to in said law or laws immediately prior to such repeal. G. It shall be unlawful for any person to abandon, leave, or forsake. any animal within the county. ), Section XL It shall be unlawful for any person to keep any vicious I, . I ' 6 0 E ., .. . ,1 animar within the county, unless under restraint and on the premises of the owner of keeper. Although security dogs need not necessarily be kept under restraint while on the premises of their owner or keeper, they nevertheless are subject to all other provisions of this ordinance as that of any other animal, while off premises. Upon an AnimEll Control Officer's observation of a vicious animal at . large or on the premises of its owner or keeper and not restrained by a competent person, Said officer shall impound said animal. Upon an Animal Control Officer's receipt of a complaint that an animal is behaving or has behaved viciously and is at large or on the premises of its owner and not restrained by a competent person, said officer shall investigate said complaint and, upon a finding that there is probable cause to believe a violation has occurred, shall take any action provided by this ordinance or any State law as the circumstances may require. Section XII. It shall be unlawful for an owner or keeper to permit an • 1 animal or animals to create a nuisance, or to maintain a nuisance created by an animal or animals. Compliance shall be required as follows: A. When an animal control officer or law enforcement officer . 1 observes a violation, the owner or keeper will be provided written notification of • such violation and be given forty-eight (48) hours from the time of notification • to abate the nuisance. . . El. Upon receipt of a written detailed and signed complaint alleging that any person is maintaining a nuisance as defined in this ordinance, the Health Director shall cause the owner or keeper of the animal or animals in question to be notified that a complaint has been received, and shall cause the situation complained of to be investigated and a report and findings thereon to be reduced s , -,.., .. _•,;:, -,, Pe,i, . ' . ' • ' . - - • , *.:-:-.. ' .• `":1'''':: :':E - ---- - , -- . ,-,-,,:..t- - .. - ,-::. :-.,...-.- - ----, . . .-.„74,4.,,i'c??..,7e,.:4,;=:::p---',.•',""..:.1,:e,,'.-.,- , .,- , • .. ' '0,...-A.;:'''''.,.' t''' " ',"=', .'4,t°''''''!.^. ,X."..1113',• ,.,-1-P,q'-'1,-"'-',..t.%-ri -4-.,"--",4,,,.,''''-,,' : 1 • ., - , :.,.,4.,',:-.4.:,,,,,,•.i::,-,-,-1,,'-',:-- :.?" :i.:-, ,..:::''' _': 1, ''', _.'.-,it,.• ..:Y`,;',.-- ,.".,` i,.,.14; ."7, :::',-,'"?..!,--::;:i.. -..,0AV)1"Pff.7,401,1,. .„,..:;'4'4'i..-49W,r- ' 1 L! r animar within the county, unless under restraint and on the premises of the owner of keeper. Although security dogs nqed not necessarily be kept under I , restraint while on the premises of their owner or keeper, they nevertheless are subject to all other provisions of this ordinance as that of any other animal, while off premises. .. . Upon an Animal* Control Officer's observation of a vicious animal at large or on the premises of its owner or keeper and not restrained by a competent person, said officer shell impound said animal. Upon an Animal Control Officer's receipt of a complaint that an animal Is behaving or has behaved viciously and is at large or on the premises of its owner and not restrained by a competent person, said officer- shall investigate said complaint and, upon a finding that there is probable cause to believe a violation has occurred, shall take any action provided by this ordinance or any State law as the circumstances may require. Section XEL It shall be unlawful for an owner or keeper to permit an . I animal or animals to create a nuisance, or to maintain a nuisance created by an 1 animal or animals. Compliance shall be required as follows: A. When an animal control officer or law enforcement officer . . observes a violation, the owner or keeper will be provided written notification of such violation and be given forty-eight (48) hours from the time of notification • . to abate the nuisance. - . B. Upon receipt of a written detailed and signed complaint alleging that any person is maintaining a nuisance as defined in this ordinance, the Health Director shall cause the owner or keeper of the animal or animals in question to -.., be notified that a complaint has been received, and shall cause the situation complained of to be investigated and a report and findings thereon to be reduced -1 P' - - • • , , • _ .. ,,.. .!....::2-,JA`,-, .-& :,:•--- _ , -,,,,,t'•-,-.):,:- * x� fi FJs >ktrR a ? ,S r r4:, s f s'� $Y'.�7� »�s �,�e,a: ..r> >r 'c '� e'R.i:'a'= 's',°i-" jj .[[ hx to writing. i C. If the written findings indicate that the complaint is justified the Health Director or person duly authorized by the Health Director shall cause-the owner or keeper of the animal or animals in question to be so notified in writing, and shall order abatement of such nuisance within forty-eight (48) hours by whatever means may be necessary. In the event the owner or keeper of the ;j animal or animals is unknown and cannot be ascertained, the notice and order, along with a general description of the animal or animals shall be posted for forty-eight (48) hours at the Animal Control Shelter and the county courthouse. D. If after forty-eight (48) hours of the date of receipt by the owner or keeper of the notice the nuisance is not abated, the animal creating the nuisance shall be impounded. Any stray may be impounded immediately upon the Health Director's determination that it is creating a nuisance as defined in this ordinance. Section XIII. It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly and intentionally to harbor, feed, keep in possession by confinement, or otherwise, any dog that does not belong to him, unless he has, within seventy-two (72) hours from the time such dog came into his possession, notified an Animal Control Officer. A. Any animal which appears to be lost, stray or unwanted, not wearing a currently valid tax tag or a currently,valid rabies vaccination tag as required by state law or this ordinance, or not under restraint in violation of this ordinance, may be seized, impounded, and confined in a humane manner in the Animal Control Shelter and thereafter disposed of pursuant to procedures of the Animal Control Shelter. B. Impoundment of such an animal shall not relieve the owner or 1 keeper.thereof from any penalty whicii- may be imposed for violation of this • ordinance. C. Any animal seized and impounded which is badly wounded pr diseased (not a rabies suspect), and has no identification may be destroyed pursuant to procedures of the Animal Control Shelter. If the animal has identification, the Animal Control Shelter shall attempt to notify the owner or keeper before disposing- of such animal. Section XIV. It shall be unlawful and a violation of this ordinance for any animal owner, keeper or other person to fail to comply with the laws of North Carolina relating to the control of rabies. Section XV. Hospitals, clinics and other premises operated by licensed veterinarians for the care and treatment of animals are exempt from the provisions of this ordinance except for the provisions relating to cruelty to animals and rabies control. Section XVI. Ail animal impounded under this ordinance may be reclaimed by its owner or keeper according to the procedures of the Animal Control Shelter, but, if impounded as vicious, only upon written authorization of ' the Animal Control Officer. Said authorization shall be granted when the Animal Control Officer is reasonably assured that the vicious animal will be properly restrained on the premises of its owner or keeper. Unless thus reclaimed or otherwise ordered by the Animal Control Officer, the impounded animal may be allowed to be adopted or humanely destroyed after seven (7) days of impoundment, according to standard Animal Control Shelter procedures. in lieu of impoundment, the Health Director is authorized to issue a confinement order to the animal owner or keeper that would require the owner or keeper to confine an animal violating provisions of the ordinance. Failure to ro. C �1 ' ; a.,. . ' { . .. 4 4-,,, f dk gy, �i '," . ' ;,,,,A " " ;!/-., 4 ' "%:,, c '. ;•.','';'' . ?»h , " =r e d. .,f ` r $`? p rm-s S', ,,. .z ,Y, s 9 - r`(" , ,t4....»" a , p r p r a r COE I • 1 • thus confine the animal or keeper would constitute a further violation of the 1 1 ordinance, subjecting the owner to appropriate;..criminal or civil penalties. Section XVII. The following penalties shall pertain to violations_pf this ordinance. A. The violation of any provision of this ordinance shall be a misdemeanor and any person convicted of such violation shall be punishable as provided in G.S. 14-4. Each day's violation of this ordinance is a separate offense. Payment of a fine imposed in criminal proceedings pursuant to this subsection does not relieve a person of his liability for taxes or fees imposed r under this ordinance. B. Enforcement of this ordinance may be by appropriate equitable remedy, injunction or order of abatement issuing from a court of competent jurisdiction pursuant to C.S. 153A-123 (d) and (e). C. In addition to and not in lieu of the criminal penalties and other sanctions provided in this ordinance, a violation of this ordinance may also subject the offender to the civil penalties hereinafter set forth. I. Such civil penalties may be recovered by Orange County in a civil action In the nature of debt or may be collected in such other manner as prescribed herein within the prescribed time following the issuance of notice for such violation. 2. Such notice shall, among other things: (a) State upon its face the amount of the penalty if such penalty be paid within. seventy-two (72) hours from and after the issuance of the notice. (b) Notify such offender that a failure to pay the penalties within the prescribed time shall subject such offender to a civil action in the 1" - C 1 s ',2"-" II • ' • nature-of debt for the stated penalty plui,an additional penalty in the amount of twenty-five dollars ($25.00), together with the cost of the action to be taxed by the Court. (c) Further provide that such offender may answer the said notice by mailing said notice, and stated penalty to the Health Department at " 111 the appropriate address, and that upon payment, such case or claim and right of action by Orange County will be deemed compromised and settled. (d) State that such penalties must be paid within seventy- two (72) hours from issuance of such notice. Such notice shall further state that if such notice of violaiton is not paid within said seventy-two (72) hour period, court action by the filing of civil complaint for collection of such penalty may be taken. 3. The Health Director is authorized to accept such payments in full and final settlement of the claim or claims, right or rights of action which Orange County may have to enforce such penalty by civil action in the nature of debt. Acceptance of such penalty shall be deemed a full and final release of any and all such claims, or rights of action arising out of such contended violation or violations, 4. The civil penalty for violation of this ordinance is twenty-five • ($25.00) dollars. Said penalty shall be paid within seventy-two (72) hours from and after the issuance of the notice referred to above. 5. The notice of violation referred to herein may be delivered to the person violating the provisions of this ordinance in person, or may be mailed to said person at his last known address. 6. In addition to the penalty prescribed in subsection (4) above, should it become necessary to institute a civil action to collect any penalty • ' Z' " " ' ,,■."' - . 7'. 0-71,"".,'".'":',1," 7.V4.1 "It,4.7..,.. ,.104.7.74,'''',, t .. ....-,-..... Bit • . - 1 Ihereunder, the violator shall also be subject to an additional penalty of twenty— five ($25.00) dollars. 7. All penalties paid to the Health Department or as may be recovered in a civil action in the nature of debt as herein provided shall be paid into the general fund of Orange County. Section XVIII. This ordinance shall be effective Ja24_1,.....11144 . Adopted this the 3rd day of October, 1983. .7.4.v. . , ,.. ' - 't- ■ , .. . * '" ''.- *** ''''-• -* - ' .- - "--*:'-'-. ***'-'-/. :--7:; - ..,:i.:-...12-:,i,--e.„, ., '-.--- -',...%-a.e.-: -''',,Y•, - -..-,1',-,-1,— -.,,,,'''..-A-4-g, I . . 1 . . . . . - . . . . .. , ,.. •'. .• ::.',.7'-:-..-',id .' .. a)A1RD Of -.ii.'":155.1:CiNEFS ' ilrtion .1ger Ida. ,_,•• :::,-:,.,-'■-:•,■-. ,-,-.,,,;, ,' . ' ; .-•;.:-:.:•1.4,:!,- _,;;::;'....,.*:;:.,••,,,,1:,, . ,: •....: . ,;;, -,--;:',,,...4, . %,' !,, . .. .:,..,:. ."'. ,-":;•:',",' ', 7;-; : :.*' ,`, ':-1-,- '27:-1'','' '3f7!! '1''.'.: - '' '.7- • ... ; ,: ...:.......-..-:,..ts. ' ''' ''''''' 1, - .... •-• 1-",'7..,..'..F.7.• ,. ''''', ACEION AGENDA Ii ABSTEC • it No: . . — mDEV:NG DATE October 3, 1983 Subject:. Road Improvements Petition * US 70 . . • . • Depzatnent: Planning Public Hearing: '---. kr-7—a ---s X no - ---, A mr: ■v:I..; t s • infOrnetann COnta:t: ' - Petition Susan Smith ___ Phone Number: 732-8181 EXT. 349 PURPOSE: To consider a petition submitted by citizens living near and using US 1.0 BuSiness. 1.. :.:z n NEED: Due to weathei conditions during the year and the extent of use of US 70 Business, the road is in need of maintenance attention. A-petition has been submitted requesting that repair, widening and resurfacing work be done'On US 70 Business-as soon as possible. . I . Mike Mills, Highway Maintenance Engineer (DOT). for Orange County, is responsible for compilingla resurfacing needs list for primary, urban and secondary roads in Orange CountyL: Mills has recently completed the list and will be submitting it to the Graham office which will, folloWing review and approval, send the list to the Greensbor4 office for allocation of funds. Mills is responsible for the secondary roads on the list as funding for these roads is already aVailable. However, funding for primary and urban roads is determined by the Greensboro office and i4 allocated on a competitive priority basis. Mills indicat d that US 70 Business is the #1 priority primary road resurfacing need on his 1 st. Mills further indicated that any indication of public support for this matter ,. would contriblte to the favorable review of the project for funding. INTACT: Endorsement o the petition.by the Board would augment the recommendation made by Orange Co ty's Highway Maintenance Engineer and improve the priority standing of the road fOr funding. Should-the road be approved for funding it is unlikely that construction will begin:before the spring paving schedule given the lateness in the current fall construction flrogram and damage which may occur during the winter months. : COMMENDATION: The Plannin Staff recommends endorsement of the petition. . • . . . _ ='7"—.- . • , • ' - — --. .qi.14:V:" .., . • ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 106 EAST MARGARET LANE HIL.LSBOROUGH N. C. 27278 RICHARD cWHITYEELCber DEN LLOYD m^mv*LL NORMAN WALKER DON WILLHOIT October 5, 1983 Mr. Mike Mills Highway Maintenance Engineer North Carolina Department of Transportation Old N. C. Hwy 86 Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 Dear Mr. Mills: This is to informlou that North Carolina Department of Transportation tak^acti,. to .==", fa Highway Business 70 East between Churton Street in Hillsborough and U. S. Highway 70 Bypass. This section of road is in a state of disrepair and is contributing to hazardous driving conditions. Realizing that scheduli mmedfat action on resurfacing, it is requested ueo^" that, hat" in the interim, immediate action be taken to make spot improvements of the road. This condition the road was brought to the Board's attention through th petitions contain ng 578 signatures. roug the attached ! Thank you for your time and attention. Sinoe'ely ,- . `fohar« E Orange County Commissioners Attachment: Petition 05* Pl;r1'1'1QN Highway 70 Business, located east of Hillsborough is in immediate need of attention. It has eroded and buckled, causing cars to be knocked out of alignment, as well as contributing to hazardous, driving conditions. In some areas, grass can be seen graving out of the Joints. WE, the undersigned residents, and non-resident users of Highway 70 Business, do hereby pe tion the Highway Commissioners to give Lion to the pair, widening, and resurfacing f Hi h their most urgent wan- don possible: g g aaY 70 Business as soon NAME/S" ADDRESSES • DATE: (Subttted by) 055 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NO. E5 MEETING DATE October 3. 1983 SUBJECT: Fireman's Relief Fund DEPARTMENT: Emergency Services PUBLIC HEARING: YES x NO l ; -ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: Bobby Baker, Director 929-8109 Or 732-8161 PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH - 32-8181 HILLSBOROUGH - 732- 9361 CHAPEL HILL - 967-9251 MEBANE - 227-2031 DURHAM - 688-7331 • PURPOSE: For the Board to appoint two individuals as trustees to the New Hope Fireman's Relief Fund. NEED: Unlike other fire districts in the county the New Hope District has not established a Fireman's Relief Fund. Fireman's Relief Funds are locally administered at the fire district level and provide payments to firemen in the event of injury, disability or death. IMPACT: In order ;to make this service available to the firemen of the New Hope Fire District, a five-member board of trustees needs to be created to administer this fund. In accordance with State law the board is comprised of two menbers of the local fire department, two by the County Board of Commissioners and one by the N. C. Insurance Commissioner. ( RECOMMENDATION(S): Appoint Mr. John Carroll and 'Mr. Neil Tapp. AcTIONI:: :: :1111SIT°t2 4.41.e4114.1 ,0 6 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Item No, E-6 1 NEEZaG DATE Octobea 3, 1983 Subictl" REFUNDS O TAXES 1 Department,: Tax Supervisor 120blic Hearing: Yes ' • • AttachmentIO:Iiidiviaual Requests Information Contact: KbrmiC 1.16-0 More'No:ober:4 Ext. 1!213 puirose: REFUNDS • weed: SEE ATTACHED Irr9a6t,: SEE ATTACHED Rcoamm2m1;ation(a): SEE ATTACHED TW; Chapel Hill . ACCT # 7778 TRACTO MAP (D. L. Peterson Trust BILLO 8235305 Tax Department P. O. Box 13269 Baltimore, Maryland 21203 COMMENT: Clais auto listed for 1982 sold prior to January T!,, 1982 (see lett r). ACTION REQUEST Refund 1982 Tax COuntly Tax $41.95 (includes, $5.10 late listing penalty) Chapel Hill School Dist. 9.78 Chap 1 Hill Fire Dist. 4.36 TOTAL $56.09 RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE REFUND • ORDER : DATE: • Chapel Hill ogo' TWP ACCT # 54722(82),51391(89 TRACT# 715843 • MAP 7.1168..1 1 BILL# 8211098,81423 William E. Gout 280 Lower Via Casitas Apartment 4 Greenbrae, California 94909 COMMENT: Wrong house listed here for 1981 and 1982 or wrong house data (seelcard); listed to Cazwell, Inc. c/o Geut(1/81 purchaser) for '81; 02 refund amounts includes amount attributable to reduction of 5% valuation of household personal property from $2193 to $1792. • • ACTION REQUESTED: REFUND 1982" 1981 TOTALS Countly Tax 46.23 43. 5 89.78 Chaptil Hill School Dist. 12.27 11.21 23.48 So Orange Fire Dist. 5.8B '5.60 11.48 TOTALS " 64.38 60.38 124.74 RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE REFUND ORDER : DATE: • TWP Hillsboroough • ACCT # 44583 05 . • 4 TRACT# 403831 MAP 4.45A.C.3 BILLS 822138,815178,80251 Albert G. end Esther 8ivins P. O. Box 2834j Durham, North araline 27705 COMMENT: age (74 not 79 model) depreciation on double wide (11sted as reel) erroneous 1980 through 1982 (corrected for 198)); 1980 valuation corrected per 1980 Mobile Home pricing sheet from 17950 (rounded to lexp) to 9635 (rounded to 9600) in computiation; 82 refund amount accounts For reduction of 5% valuation of Household personal property'from $862 to $622. • ACTION REQUESTED; REFUND 1982 — 1981 198ft TOTALS \ County 27.67 26.06 83.58 137.31 Orange Fire 1.51 1.44 3.36 6.31 TOTALS 29.18 27.50 86.94 143.62 • RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE REFUND ORDER • DATE: • // 1 ..._. .. r 1 f t l Y h 4 -✓.i+� V i.0 r Iu,�.. ORANGE COUNTY re ' `u6O BOARD Or COMMISSIoNER5 ACTION AGENDA ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NO.E-7 MEETING DATE •0ctnhwr 1., 14R'? SUBJECT: Community Development Rehabilitation Contracts DEPARTMENT: Communit Development PUBLIC HEARING: YES x NO ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: Wilbert McAdoo -Ext. r29 Bid Results PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH - 732-8181 HILLSBOROUGH - 732-9361 CHAPEL HILL - 967-9251 MEBANE - 227-2031 DURHAM = 688-733] • PURPOSE: Award of three Housing Rehabilitation Contracts. NEED: Sealed bids were received and opened on September 27, 1983.. Attached is a tabulation of the bids by dwell- ing unit numbers. IMPACT: Award of contract to the lowest bidder will be consistent with present housing rehabilitation bid procedure. RECOMMENDATION(S): � r DU# Street Contractor Bid Amount 19 Lawndale Avenue Frank Griffin & Associates 6,700.00 21 Tarain Street Samuel English 3,685.00 61 • Hill Street ,Frank Grt-ffi n &: $pci aces :4,225.00 . . I L - '61 RESULTS OF 010 OPENING •,. .::/ER:....Jean Satterfield _ APPLICATION NUMBER_ #19 2.:•op Ess; LawndalelAvenUe COST 'EST 1rIATE: 7,045.00 .... i :EP.CE1•ITAGE OF BID OVER UNOER____LE _ __COST EST I MATE - HECK ONE: JOB BO I X I JOG NEGOTIATED 1--_-_-1 COMPANy B I D AMOUNT. Gates Construction 7,430.00 .Samuel English . • • . 7,240.00 -:. Eugene Mar . 9,270.00 _Tylor Horne_ Iriprovemrant 8,095.00 . 77 Frank Griffin & Associates 6,700.00 aids opened by Robert Wilcnn Time of Bid Opening: 3:°° P-m• Date of Bid Op ning: September 27, 1983 Witnessed by; Roxanniz klarrPn ...*.......,... ...............................-....... - 41. .9st. Acceptable Bid: 6,700.(in. — otiated Amount: N/A :.:*.•ntractor: .,. NAME Route 5, Box 674, Greensboro, N.C. 27405 ADDRESS 375-5353 PHONE NUMBER ' r.OMMENTS: . ../ ("it Submitted by: _it!, 1-(a...1.-74- 711 a..6.-eCz._< . DATE: 9- ) 7-g3 a id Approved by; .. , — Proceed Order: issued fj Not Issued 1 J COMMENTS; 062 . RESuLTS OF BID OPEnING 7, E?.: Catherine lPherribo ___ APPUCAT!ON NUMBER 4;21 1 :7:ORE55: _Torain Street ___ COST ESTIMATE: 3,136:00 . ___ _ ;ET%C.ENTABE OF BID OVER icgo UNDER __COST ESTIMATE 1 :-;ECK ONE: JOB BID I X I J06 NEGOTIATED 1-7:1 _ COMPANY 5ID AMOWT 1 Gates Construction Samuel Englishl ,. . .146.a5-011._ 1 Eugene Morrow 1 _44nnn nn I Taylor Home Improvement I • Frank Griffin 4 Associates _4,440 nn 7:ids opened bYl: Robert Wilson — Time of Bid Odening: 3:00 p.m. — -- Date of Bid Opening: September 27, 1983 witnessed by: Roxanne Warren ........, . , .. .r.) est Acceptable Bid: 3,685.00 __ :egotiated Amount N/A :cntractor: Samuel En.lish NAME Route 1, Box 16, Efland, N.C. 27241 ADDRESS 563-1292 __ PHONE NUMBER 7.0MMENTS.: .. 1 Submitted by: ..._ 14_,,/ L,..1_,L. ._/.c,--,-( // C/Le,;„ DATE: '7 - ,72 7 _ a i a Approved by: Proceed Order: 1 ssueCf I I Not, Issued I I COMENTS: • , , • 63 RESULTS OF BID OPENING OWNER: Bobby Richmond APPLICATION NUMBER #61 ADDRESS: Hill Street COST ESTIMATE: 4,390.00 PERCENTAGE OF 41) OVER UNDER 3.76 CHECK ONE: JOB BID r:2:] JOB NEGOTIATED CM4PANY BID AMOUNT, 1. Gates Constl-uctinn 4 825 Of 8 2. Samuel English 4,595.00 3.. Eugene Morrow 6,200.00 4. Taylor Home TMarnVeMent 5,620.00 5. Frank Griff - 4,225.00 Bids opened by: Robert Wilsot Time of Bid Opening: 3:00 p.m. -- Bate of Bid Openin: September 27, 1983 Witnessed by: Roxanne WArrpn, Lowest Acceptable Bid: 4,225.00 Negotiated Amount: N/A Contractor: Frank Griff'a . - NAME Route 5, Box 674, Greensboro, N.C. .274n9 ADDRESS 375-5353 PHONE NUMBER COMMENTS: Submitted by:__ L711 C-ct..12c.c DATE: .2 7- Bid Approved by: Proceed Order: Issued E:::] Not Issued r---1 CO:VENTS: uKAmLIt. mu n t$ U ' • BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NO. E-8 ~ • MEETING DATE October 3' 1981 SUBJECT: National Family Sexuality Week DEPARTMENT: County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING: YES X No _____ ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT:Clerk to the.8oard ` ' ext. 5O5 or 510 Yes PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH - 732-8101 HILLSBOROUGH - 732-9361 CHAPEL HILL - 967-9357 MEBANE - 227-2031 • DURHAM - ', ----- - -r------ `1 ! PURPOSE: For the Board to consider approving a resolution proclaiming October 6~11 as National Family Sexuality Week. NEED: Planned Parenthood of Orange County, Inc., is seeking the endorsement of the Orange County Board of Commissioners of October 8-11 as National Family ``.. Sexuality Week. i ^n IMPACT: '; - ` R[CVnMEMUn|Iom[S\': As the Board �,‹Ides. , ^' ' . . !-+�. ' ^ � '`� `• ``!� 614 066 ••• PROCLAMATION for NATIONAL FAMILY SEXUALITY EDUCATION WEEK WHEREAS, much of the fundamental education of the child occurs within the family, parents are the primary sexuality educators of their children; • WHEREAS, parents should be given community support in fulfilling this vital responsibility; WHEREAS, parents and potential parents need to be aware of the resources which provide needed information to assist them in the sexuality education of their children; and, WHEREAS, the purpose and commitment to strengthen the American family are reflected in National Family Sexuality Education Week; THEREFORE, It is hereby proclaimed that October 5 through ii be designated National Family Sexuality Education Week. All citizens and civic, health, educational, social and family organizations are encouraged to commemorate this week by supporting • family sexuality education. Signature -------Date Title ,County 1 ©6, Planned Parenthood of Orange County, In . P.O.Box 3258 • Chapel Hill,N.C.77515-3258 • (919)942-PPOC/7762 P.O.Box 1323 • Hillsborough,N.C.27278 • (919)732-6161 September 6, 1983 ROARS Of PIREcml. Officers: PRESIDENT ®tsb,,Mclean Y5myCompan Dear County Commissioners: km flaky SECRETARY .. 3tian The week of October 5-11 has been designated as National Family Nancy Dak Realer Sexuality Education Week (NFSEW) through the cooperative efforts of MEN Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) and the Institute for ft/ „� Family Research and Education. Since 1975, this time has been set Marsha be aside each year to convey an important message: parents are the pri- tVillivn mary sexuality educators of their children. The purpose of NFSEW is Peke Ibla Chsslert to encourage individuals, community organizations, and institutions to nB°nnie,� celebrate October 5-11 by conducting special events prompting family Kaman Cuttaskon education about sexuality. The week is dedicated to supporting er[ mae parr is in their efforts to guarantee children accurate and healthy Her wetdod information about sexuality. Sander Marshal fedi Mohr,M.D. Cab Nutter NFSEW emphasizes the importance of a strong partnership between Meln OWn L4d4 Paam the community and the family in helping young people foster responsibl• Rm.Wiliam Richardson- E0e3e5Na' and positive ideas about sexuality. Schools, churches, community or, i- Nelda Our zat ons and agencies in Orange County can assume leadership roles dur rg * s NFS by providing information, resources, and educational programs fo Cad Walsers Ce.tn,de Wftfis.M.D. parents and children. The more reinforcement parents and potential MEDICAL COMMRnEr parents receive from their community, the more prepared and secure the maim ormner,M.0.,Chair wil] be as they take on the responsibility as primary sexuality educat..rs FElls a*k M.D. of their children. Betty Campton,FNP. Man Crou,M-0. NiBda Cuenq,MD, Planned Parenthood of Orange County (PPOC) is a year-old affiliat Rldaline d eaks,.Leaks,. of the national organization (PPFA) and is interested in highlighting lad Mohr,M.P. Map Singer.M.D. this week by sponsoring community awareness activities around Orange. ;,.Wnes,F.N. County. Our efforts would support the premises that knowledge leads t. Gertrude M.D, responsible sexual behavior and that providing children with the appro IXECLD1S P1RECTORr pri to sexuality education is an important aspect of parenthood. !wa n.Coim,FA.SPl4 MECOCAE DIBECTORt We would like to request that you officially endorse October 5-11 tx,ttor wer M.D. as ational Family Sexuality Education Week by signing the enclosed tb1Al.SET.TO YNi IMAM pro lamatiun. Your support and public endorsement will make a signifi can contribution in our campaign to increase public awareness of this FondaHw.p...r.Anom.., Law issu . Please feel free to contact me if you desire further information. sroFaaRS; Da.and Mrs.C.Fordham Sincerely, Mr.and Mrs.Howard Lee Dr.and Mrs.C.Arden Miner Mr.and Mrs.Dean Smith J ! q Mr.and Mrs Edwud Yayyy,Ir.. �s.�J1�/hr.te 7�11y,+(l�,i[,,+,1._ Geri Laplace Health Educator C1./,J wv enclosure ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 106 EAST MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGH. N. C. 27278 RICHARD E.WHITTED, BEN LLOYD SHIRLEY E.MARSHALL NORMAN WALKER DON WILLIIOIT COUNTY OF ORANGE PROCLAMATION WHEREAS: OftangeCounty's memboo and Zeadas cure ob4eAving Nationat 4-H Week, Octobers 2-7, 1983; and WHEREAS: FoaA-HH1.6 an integ4at pant oi the. U. S. department ati 4gnicuttu4e and the tand-gAant univeAsity system in each state. In North CaAotina, the Noth Carotin AgAicuttuAat Extension Se4vice, headquanteked on the cimpuses oi Noft...th Canotina State UniVeuity and A g T State Univensity, pnovides a ptoliessionat teadeA6hip base 6°f. the 4-H pkognam, ExtensLon 4ta46slin each county-p4o6essionatz and paAapnoliessionats7and adult and tean votunteens canxy out thi puocim at the tocat texet. WHEREAS: 4-H members wanking with educationat teakn-by-daing ptojects pat into pnactiee new 6 kiLs and science as they annive "To Make The Beat Bittek," the motto 06 4-H Ctub worth; and WHEREAS: The citizenship and teadenship t4aining which members neeeive in this pnogflam is a vatua6te asset to OWE democ4a2ic way 06 tilie; now THEREFORE: We, the Orange County Boated 06 Commissionens, County 06 0/Lange, do hereby pkocta,qn October 2-7, 1983 as "NATIONAL 4-H WEEK" ..th Orange Coumty, and uAge alt o4 00-/i peopte to encomage and support the work 06 the 4-H Ctub.6. • ---- - • • . •••• ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS L-; -• This the 34d day 06 OctobeA, 1983. ORANGE COUNTY ' 067 • BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NO. E-9 MEETING DATE Dttofirm 14R1 SUBJECT: Proposed Blldget Amendments DEPARTMENT: Finance PUBLIC HEARING: YES X NO ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Clayton ext, 495 PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH - 732-8181 Yes HILLSBOROUGH - 732-9361 CHAPEL HILL - 967-9251 MEBANE - 227-2031 DURHAM - 688-7331 PURPOSE: Consideration of proposed budget amendments. NEED: GENERAL FUND: To budget for the Emergency Food Assistance Program. 44..56° IMPACT: GENERAL FUND: This amendment will appropriate funds to the Emergency Food Assistance Program that are available from the U. S. Department of Agriculture. RECOMMENDATION(S): Approval. (13413 ORANGE COUNTY PROPOSED 1983 - 84 BUDGET AMENDMENT The 1983 -- 84 Budget Ordinance 06 Orange County a4 adopted on June 27, 1983 and bubbequentey amended, .ib heaeby amended ab 6ottouia: GENERAL FUND: App wpnirr to n: Eme:Agency Food Aabi,atance 2,500. Sowcce: Agn.Lcu e"tune Giant 2,500. To budget boa i U.S. Department o6 Agnizu to a Gaunt that ib evaLeabte to Oaange County 6or. .the Emmengeney Food Abbibtance Pf.ognam. APp&oved - day o6 _._ , 1983. 3 - .1 ORANGE COUNTY 0 ,� BOARD OF O sri Action Agenda ACTION AI k I AESIRICr Item No. E-10 MEETING- DATE Octobee:3; 1983. Subject: APPOINTMENTS tit: COMMISSIONERS _ I Public Wig: � ` no J A t S �' •�.�= •• Cwt: SHARON ALLISON NO ACTING CLERK TO THE BOARD ___ Phone Number: 732-8181 ext. 505 PUIPOSE: TO MAINTAIN COMMISSIONERS' APPOINTED BOARDS AT EFFECTIVE MEMBERSHIP LEVELS. TO UPDATE BOARD OW UPCOMING VACANCIES. COMMISSION FOR WOMEN: 1 vacancy - Aebume submitted bon. GAIL McCLAIN. This is a two year appointment. ORANGE COUNT BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS: 2 vacancies -- M . JOE C, REES and M . JAMES P. RAY would Like to be Reappa' •_ to another 3 yaw term. ORANGE COUNTS( PLANNING BOARD: 2 uacamiea - MA. JOHN S. KIZER and Mt. DAVID SH. KLIN woad Like to be Aenppointed•to another 3 year. t• . In addition M' . Bean Pottoch has submitted a Au e lion the OAarg;e County naming Board. HILLSBOROUGH PLANNING BOARD: The Town of H.i,Z.Leboioiigh Recommend DR, ROBERT MURP Y and Mn. TARLTON DAVIS to ilat the unexpihed teAm ofMA. Au thus P.fambech and Ms. Josephine Hateman, AD HOC SCHOOL CAPITAL. TASK FORCE: 4 vacancies - The Board appointed 72 membets on September 6, 7983; 3 membeaa on Septembea '0, 1983. o r Eoe, c Orange gonnig $rilnols 200 EAST KING STREET 'PeOrioUco. HILLSBOROUGH,NORTH CAROLINA 27278 OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT PICO 732-B126 September 27, 1983 Ms. Sharon AllisOn, Acting Clerk Orange County Board of Commissioners Courthouse — Margaret Lane Hillsborough, NC 27278 . . Dear Ms. Allison:, It was our understanding that the Commissioners reserved a space on the Capital Needs Task Force for the purpose of a nomination from the Orange County' Board of Education. This additional nomination was to be a teacher in the school system. At the September 26 meeting, the Orange County Board of Education formally approved the nomination of Mr. Tommy Leonard, teacher at Orange High School, for the Task Force. Mr. Leonard's address is: Mr. Tommy Leonard Route 4, Box 210 Hillsborough, NC 27278 Sincerely, (11 th 4,1( Dan G. Lun.ford Superintendent DGL:ha cc: Mr. Kenneth Thompson, County Manager Mr. Max M. Kennedy, Board Chairman :,,,.,._. •-:7....7.%:'.7 - ''''"2...po:t."4-,..?_,--z...' . ::-..-.'^..t,-.-. 7criTE.C.E-a50.41.1.2.: ,..-,; P',':;.-:-.•-.,-,,-:;:.!.'...:-..:.--..-.:41t.--:. - _...*''.' _. •; A • , *'7.`":4',.:-,..:..-7 -•*---. -',A 21=-0r bv-4r_ura-,- . . . • ':' . ' ,- '• '..!•-,''',...,,,.7.',,i,f.,--:,--,,.7:-•••4 ' " ' ' ' - ," .c.f4i,':,7 DA5M: October 3, 1983 f- , ,.. _ .... , -.--- . ■ _ - - . ::177 • . 1 :• . ,. . . . . - . „ Subject= Proposed Amendment to the Land Use Plan.for 3.01 acres in Hillsborough . Township I .. . . I .. . . . r.„,___.....■,.............----.....-----...-- -1 [putthc. Hearing: . yezr_ x. D..pat',.. .nt.. r '•L'cual.Mig- -- - .. • ... - ' --r---7 ;-,, --- - __._._.._.__,...-:---•7--r. 1 ittetUZZEe=0.Coo&v..ecti: Susan. Smith- . . -PAi:t2c72: 1-ttsi z-Locatith,Map; — Land Use Plan.... CategOry Description' " ph:= Ni32p,r,7 '32-8181. Eat, 349 _ .. - __......-_ • • . ., . - , • , . ;:. :',.:..:.. .-.., . . To co n eider apt,g a?.. cy.f a propoSed,amendment. to the Land, Use Plan .• from Etura1 Resi -itial, to Teci Year Transition for 3.01 acres in Hillsborough • .C.:" Township subinitimd by Jm-es Rae Freeland, :. ,--- applicant has requested that 3.03. acres located in Hillsborough.Townslrip and shown as a portion of lot 4 an Tax liap 45 be redesignated as Ten Year Transitica. The property is located an the east side of LC.. 86, south of the'Southern Railway 1-frio and Joppa Oaks'subdivision. The tract is currentl. .' . designated Rural Residential in the adopted Land Use Plan- , - The 3.01 acrI tract ia",botnobd on the north by Joppa Oaks Subdivision and ., N.C. 86; on the east by the prOperties of Meadie Arnold.Ttrmer and Joppa Oaks subdivisioHa; Ion, the south by Piedmont Electric Mtubership Corporatibn' ;-..and ma tile west by N.C. 86 and.DEldwood Phase II. 1 The applicant has alio sliomitted a recp.p.st that, the 3-01 acres by rezoned R-1 to,R-4'Tedium.intensity residential. The proposed. menthol= to the Land - . Use Plan would al_law far the proposed use of the property. ., - , . . . . The proposed change to the land Use Plan would extend the 10 Year. Transiticn. east of N.C. 86 to include the 3.01 acre tract. The proposal would not be incompatible with the existing development an the area. The tract has fan on LC. 86-arterial along the:western edge of the property and frontage on a ' 60' easement iJoich, intersects with N.C. 86 at the northerrmrst : career of the property, -alcri g. the eastern property edge.' Town of Hillsborough ewer and wa r services exist'or a:re proposed in the proadmity of the property; water Lines serve the property could be extended from Joppa Oaks subdivi'sion and sewer ' es could be extende,d Pat under N.C. 86. ' . _ . • I . . _ IHENDAT/OU: The Planning Board vote on a motiOn to recommend denial of the proposed amendment resulted in a tie vote. In favor of the motion were Planning Board members Greenberg; Irvin, Gordon, Walters, Wilson and Allison. Opposed to the motion were Pilkey, Kizer, Pearson, Shanklin, Bacon and Laszlo. l' 1 „ The Planning Staff recommends that the Land Use Plan be amended to extend the . Ten Year Transition Area east of NC 86 to include the 3.01 acre tract.- . s. . . - - , - . . . . ... . :i',....:,.14"4"-,.,'•,, 1.-4.74;7:1YMVi...i.:..,::.7.4::-"F, ,., .. ..., , ..,-;-„•.,*..:k..."T....,5-;i7.7,;„..-E..E.s..57,4_-..t.;-,......,..-•--... .,.4 2 i:.F.T.z.:;.-...... .7,:7:-.,4=.7,±-2. 1.....,:.... ., •,,,-.:;;;:::;, :1-:•-•••:-,4z.-..,--tc,A7--"•.i.....te-1.-.4...•I —. ■ ..7........,.;-■ W,.7;f:7;.: `',1•,..,...4.- ^•■;- q 71 EAST COAST LAND COMPANY", INa O P PI ll O e B•a s *SO k-t L t.l4 EMO R O U O tt. M o R7 H G+t A O t,t re A. 2.7A70. July- 20, 1983 • I I Orange County Planning Department r Hillsborough, NC 27278 ` Dear Sir: We request that the portion of tract #4 shown on Hillsborough township map #45 that is located east tw' of NCj86 be changed from rural residential to 10 year transition_ Our request involves approximately 3 acres. Yoursltruly, EASIr CQAST : ;4 COMPANY, INC.. / 'fill /awes Rae Freeland MiMMEMMEmormor { . , - ---c.---: . - 7- --7;7-- - -------- --- - — --. ----e-.----7.:-----7.-' -• :-----7-:-, -072, . . ...........2.- .- -....._.....„......._..........._,............ . . . . ,. 01= ni 4illstairmiir nor Orric APths Lad=M.Clscallice Jr. HILLSBOROUGH,NORTH CAROLINA 27=8. Supt.PlatePW Coormiawsin C.E. Mies A.Iloy4 .11131-4-1- * W.Paul Mznis Stowe al* . r....0 W4 Rachd 14.Stevens /-"1*:".:5' 4') Lynnwood I Einrom■ ‘..,eZ.4.,■'.0 Cbioryo'of Antal&W,.Ham ,:. 5, .4 , IP: ios July 20, 1983 Orange County Planning Department Orange County Courthouse- 114119boronsh„ N. G. 27273 Dear Sir: .. . This is to state-that water and sewer utrtlities are availa' hie to to the Thlildwood property located on tap map 45, tract 4. Conrain.ing 3.01 arrea on the.East side of Highway 86 South. Should you.have further questions, please contact this office. Sincerely, I, . , . .,. 1;. Johnson Town. Clerk r 1 • —______ • 41111101111.m.. I . .7" 1- . 1 . . ,, • ..-- ,...,..............,..--... MINIIIIIIIIIImrir PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO. THE LAND USE PLAN -COMPARISON- APPLICANT; James Rae Freeland LOCATION: Hillsborough Township. Portion of Lot 4 Tax Map 45. East of NC 86; South Of 1-85, So4thgrn Railway Line and Joppa Oaks Subdivision, LOT SIZE; REQUESTED ACTION: Redesignation from Rural Residential to Ten Year Transition RURAL RESIDENTIAL TEN YEAR TRANSITION DESCRIPTION: Land In the rural areas of the.Cpunty Land located In areas that are In the which is appropriqte'for. low-intensity/density process of changing from rural ,to urban, residential development and which would that are suitable for urban-type densities not be dependent on urban services during the Plan period, and should be provided with public utilities and services within the first 10-year phase of the Plan. LOCATIONAL CRITERIA; Land Slope Located an land with an overall slope of -NO slgn*ficant Slope Or topography problem��]_,'; less than 15% grade. t at would unreasonably-1-licreate the cost�--,7 IAA rology 0 extending water and setter I nes. Located outside of 100-ye a r flood.'prone Located outside of 100-year flood prone prone prone areas as Identified by the Corps of Engineers. areas as Identified by the Corps of ..r.): Engineers. iFjora and Fauna Cate il.,,��,, �Lto d away from sites that would, If Located away from sites that would, If developed, create a threat to unique- developed. create a threat to unique or or endangered species as Identified endangered species as Identified by by the state or federal government. the Soil Conditions state or federal government. Located In areas where general soft Located In areas where general soil conditions are suitable for on-site conditions are suitable for urban uses sewage disposal systems. because of good drainage characteristics and load bearing capacity for site devalop: MUM;. 4. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TQ THE LAND USE PLAN }j -COMPAR SO { I N- -(contlauedJ �i RURAL RESIDENTIAL TEN YEAR TRANSITION ,j-: ubiic Services/Utilities - 1. j Located In areas that will not require Located In areas which are or i urban-type S .` Yp services, could be reasonably and effl.clen.tly :at t.. served by centralized public e — _ __.._-_._--.-__----------.-__------- — -- � °Located away from areas where deyelo meet T_and_ut.1-l•I.ties.- --- __-- _.,�:_ 5 rY 'c8$ - -- `Illstoric andwCul`tural �K4 P Located away from areas where develop I would have a datrlmanta1 Impact on state ment would have a detrimental Impact 'A. or federally acknowledged historic-cultural on state or federally acknowledged sites,or-County ldentlflQd Public Interest historic-cultural sites or county Identified Public Interest Areas, i ''_rransportatian System - Na evaluation, i Located In areas that have very good # road access, as well as service by ,;• >`r '` rail lines. These areas should have # i( t the most complete transportation :t'l :+ f.• network In the Countyls planning -"A . Jurisdiction. ~: £ Etlergy Us,e - Located In areas at 5 minutes f ?� t l Located within less than a 5 minute , .? commuting time from a actlylty node, commuting time from small-scale commercial uses and a 5-10 minute commuting time from major commercial uses or an Urban area. .Existing Land Use - ;:s,;; Located IQ assoclatkon•wifih othdr -low- Located in areas which are in rarisl density.rural residential uses In-general 'tion from:rural..o,f:low-daAslty usevi,;, ,, proximity-to developed-or developing to urban pr`hjgher dity" . uses activity,-codes. ens r 7 "u, Agriculture and Forestry - Located away-"from areas that Would If Y develop- developed, ti have a detrimental- Impact on Located awe from areaswhera lnent would have a detrimental Impact b productive agricultural and managed on productive agricultural uses and 1 forest land, r managed forest land. t Population density - # Located In areas af•rural popu:l.atibn dens It ene'rali one dwelling Y, Located in areas with moderate to high Y lllnQ} unit per acre. population densities. tfit _ 4,-. -, .77-747,7`.517V7',.77:--,'ir0,:thEtIF-.7'.•4-4:4-t1;-., 5..."0.1::*•.-Z:74.r'.''ZZ%:;=,r•i-...,r----r:7-•,..:.:-"..v.,:,..V.•••=-*:'.''..:-,-'4-i',4L-'77t-'7.7,--_-;','7.-.7,*:,.._=-:-.____,•=17-.L.:;•;_____:,.'--ci .,.:._ ,.:.,... -.:4-'0_4ri,;- •,„'''.. .;:;.?-4. 7t-,-.•*§,:gi;',4_:-41.;•.3.stio...::-/,'.';',1:::,, ,•:.'5,.,=.;.- ni.,..t.:tkicl.c:-.-::%.i..4:;&i:41,.':';42- 3.-- -: '."7-*--.7-4 ; _ ,14-.1t=Ea: E-12 :'',.- 4'..1--..4 ... ACrial P-ZEMIA.TM:i..ZIESMT= :_- - - ' •: ' ,447,,,•.•_':;'p.; . I , '.7.4.,1,75_!-4-• _----../.7r • D.77‘..17•1 `1.17; October 3, 1983- . 0 76-•,' ....., :. •-,. • .. - • - ,. _ SubjeCtr. Rezoning Request - Z••2 _-83 James Rae Freeland . 1 . Public gearing: • _Yes X • ... .. - - . I Staff'Report; ' 1.12f°23-Tr'll CMEIL---•-•'-'1 Susan Smith Application; Hap mane IN,Tcarbrr, (919)•732-S181 EXT. 349 • - . • ....- ---•--. • " .`, 1-•--717R--cCSE: To consider' approval of the proposed zoning change for 3.01 acres of property from R.71 to R-4 requested by James Rae Freeland- I NEED: ! The property is located in Hillsborough Township and is shown as a portion of Lot 4 on Tax Hap 45.. It is located on' the east side of N.C. Highway 86 south of intersta -85,and the Southern Railroad.. An R-4'zoning classification would allow the development l of a subdivision with a minimum of 10,000 sq. ft. single-family Tots. . . Water and sewer service is being provided-by. o.ty-.Of co.rinecticm4to TOwi; Of -••.•71 Hillsborough sfstems.,,- ri re-protect ron:WoOd.be Provided' to the site tiy the" Orange-Rural Fire District.: Law enforcement service would be provided by the Orange County Sheriff's Department. • i " - -. . . _ .. ..,Ir 4., " . • . ,... ' . • • • I f the proposed amendment to the Land Use Plan to Ten Year Transition is rel_Sa_M': approved the R4 rezoning request should be appropriate.. The request complies with the application criteria for R-4 zoning district designation. Potential impacts to be mitigated include traffic and access onto N.C. 86 south. . ,.._. ..• .., , REC0MMENDAT1ON: The Planning Board recommends that should the Board of C.ommissioners approve the requested amendment to the Land Use Plan, an R-2 (Residential-2), not an R-4 (Residential-4), rezoning be approved for the 3.01 acres. The motion carried on a 9-3 vote. Tle Planning Staff recommends approval of the requested R-4 rezoning f See staff report). ...., ,=.....#.S•r711,..... •. .V::.'r,',V3A;;Ii.7 ..: .:.=.4.7,,..7:',... :-. ,..,..-;,,.,.... •••- • • •:"."R "..7:■••:;',":;C:t ...,.."&71,..''''Z':.;.-27.7. -::::4.::;'5i4: 4•A:. H".. 'IV "'''.-";V.';''.;•:Pr:,-',---."'..Z.: .....,•, '!'";,:1-1.4.-..tt. __ ... .. ..... .....,. .. .. .,. ..,,.....;,....14..-: • .... .......1'4,%7. .-. -.. • , e ..... ........ ................. .. ............. .-._- MEW ' / .........-......■••••••■ . . . . , . . . . ... . :- '. :.,.. .-,- '.-" •,'''' '' • '.5"•.:::-.. . •. . .. . . , . .. . .• . . .. . ----......:—....„--... . '; • • . . - ORANGE COU:NTY PLANNING DIIPARVITENT nrriallonotrGx •-- Norrra cm Rorztr,A, 27278- .744111106,.Ay .. ' TO: ORANGE semer PLANNING BOARD I ■;72._ Rad: itditeath DEPAREVENT STAPP : . I .'• DATE: „August 8, 1983 ',,. 1 • RE: 7,:4-83.MIMES RAY FREEIrom (MOND*,REQUEST) -,•-• . .. . _ ' I GENERAL INTORmATECK o..........007.0111M11141.01.11•11■.1*■•••• Applicant: -Tams Ra;y Vreeland P.O.. Bat 113' • • ' ' N.C. 27278 tOCattalt ' East aide of L . Ifighway 86 south of Intecestat- 89 and the Southern Ri-lroad Requested.Action:: Re frau 11-1 Residentztal to B4 liesddential ruzpose:: To enable residential development on 10,00D sq. ft lots in order to provide less expansive sing/a-family braes. . _ Lah Simi 3;01 acmes or ;131,119.6 sq. ft. &lasting'Land Use: Vacant, wooded trext. .... _ „ ! , ' Stamnding Land Use North -aappa OakS Sutdivisica and E-2 dis• triot. i =and'!,oningi South - Proposed. Piednont Pomer Office-operations I Center and PD0/ district. i . . . ..4 i • Ease. - Jalapa Oaks Subla:vision and 1i+2 &Strict.. West: -Vacant- land proposed as Wi.ldwood 1 sUbdivision (Phase II) and R-5 district. .. 1. .. _., Land Use Plan: Ile land Use Plan would have to be amended to changa the designation of the subject property Fran Paral Residential to 10 rear'Eransitical. The requested R-4 residential district Is one or seven (7) residential zoning districts identi ez in the Land Use Plan as being ccematible with the 10-Year Transition Area desimation. _..... _ ,....__._ _ .4.....-- ,... ., . .. . . .. . - .. . . . .. . .. _ • . . • ''. '-------7-7 -:-:—:---:7---------_______. ''' —........--_____ . , Opsw.---- ... :',':,::,•, .`,..:'. • . . . 1.-. . . - . . 0....71L . „ " . .,. ......... ....41.401' ' . ,*soswo.«,ww.................... . ,.. . . . . - -. . Apli.chl 6. Reulations: Idsted below is a comparison of uses permitted the R-1 mcl R-4 Residential districts. "*" indi - - a use permitted by right. "A? indicateS a specific use permit is required from the Pla.nning :... . :.. 4, ..,.- . or Commissioners. "B" indi.cs.tes a special use .- ,.t .... is required from the Board. of Adjuster-mt., "0" incli.- es the use is not permitted. COPIPARISai OF EMilIVIED USES 41"-USe txy right A - Class A Special-Use 0.-it permitted. .• - B - Class B Special Use • - .e....mary PERYLMED USES R1 --7-- ''•':-.;.;-.. . . Day nursez7, [lay care, private kanderwrden 13 '' B Dwelling; st+,3P-faaitly * * * * :., Mailing; twei-fmnd 1 Y , ar,Telling; multiple-family 0 rowelling; motd.le hams * * k Famil,y care ttal*.' Group care fa-11-117. B B Residential.betel (Pratiarnitiss, etc.) 0 0 Rooming house-1 0 ' * :. Temporarj,,mobile haus- 13 B Tourist houuese . .„1..) * * *------"--------"7"as'e"emi".""mllilliiilllgllillii"I"lillIlli.911111' IllIlIlllI Accessory . Airport,.general ea:dation A a Botanical=ems z * 13)ri 1 dirgs, potOtable B ' B * * Bus passenger shelter Cecetery B B Church * Crumunity center a a Extraction: of earth products A. A Gavernmental --i protective services * e Landfill (2 acres or more) A 0 landfill (Less than 2 acres) " 13 0 Parks, public and non-profit Public utility stations/substations A A Radio/TV towers B * * Schools 1 Transmission lines. 13 B Universities 1 o - * * Governmental facilities Water/Sewer pump staticms Social Clubs or lodges 0 Greenhouses (NO cnirrearthe sqles) * 0 Kennels/Riding 1st-shies a a Recreational facilities (non-profit) B B Golf club/couctry club . . ... - . ._. .........._ _ . . ... . , / . .-. , :• e . ..,..;•'•:.:. . . . „ . , . • 1 - .- . ..'. , • • ' . , . . . . .. ' k • . ___ 1 . •, - „ I . , Other applicable regulations are as follows: I DileEns:DemAL REQUIRDIENTS l'il R-4- ' I Lot area/dwelling unit 4o,000 sq. rt. 10,000 sq. ft. • Lot width 130 ft. ' 75 ft. Front yard 4o ft. 25 ft. Side/rear yards 20 ft. 10 ft. Building 1. ight 25 ft. 25 ft. SI!IE IEVEIDPMENT -COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ., • r ,.. • eI. , To give sate dndi.cation of the impact- of development of the 3.01 acre trace, thedensity standards of the R.-1 and R-4 zoning districts were applied to determine. the martmea number of housing units which could, be placed on the site. S e •e • . far-estimataig traffic generation water consumption, sewage flow and schoOl. . student populden.a were then applied to ascertain the effect of the project on therouhfaree, public utility systems and schools. These calculations are sh• • on the accemeanying table and discussed in the "Appii( t-1 on Criterie section,. , .. .. . . APPLICA/Tai CRITERIA The R-4,zoning district is cne of three (3) districts designated as "low and .e.• =- intensity residential dista•icts". The purpose of such districts is to proviele locatiosos far;low and mama intensity residential development and supporting recreational,icannunity, service and educational uses in areas where the full -e te of urban services are available or are to be provided as part of the development • process. ectitia 4.2.3 cli..the Zoning Ordinance states that the district designation will •- applied where the following conditions exist: . - 1. Designated by the adapted Land Use Plan as a Transition Area which can reasenably be expected to be annexed by' a municipality in the ensuing 10-20 years.. 1 . Staff Comment: As indicated previously, the Land Use Plaza must be amended to than, the designation of the subject property to 10- Year Transition. Given the pattern of existing development with- in tl*area, it is reasonable to assume that annexation of the weeerf.7 by the Town.of Hillsbaraugh would occur within 10-20 years. 1 ' . 2. Water and sewer lines should exist at site or be assured of installation. . as part of the development process. Staff Cannent: Water and sewer iirr._ are being extended to serve thi s general area as part of the cvelopment of Wildwood Subdivision. Imazdiaie water Service caa be provided by way of the extension of a 6inch main from JcPpa Oaks subdivision. Sewer service is being extended along the west side of N.C. 86 to serve Wildwood subdivision. To serve this tract a sewer line would have to be extended under N.0.-86. . . •_ . . ... _ .. . . . . . I . . .: . .. . • .• , . • ° ' • , . . ■ ,. ..............L. ...-...........■.....-.....-- . 81 RI 43eFilgtirg' 02 g 0 0 cr ct 0 cr cr ct g ru 0 g 0 11 1-,r 1•••2 0.: Iii) (D M 2. CD ID M F-1 0 0 m en 11 01 O.".ID ; . 1-,ii3 0 el- ° RRM 0 g /2 A '3 W g 1 V CD CD a) M a) Irci. t.3 m , II' 0 ,)C1 P3 t$ ' = n to cri 1-.cr ta ct 0:1 'U 24H a .._.....___..r.3 .. f 1:I 0 a '8 CD \ 5* E ........-.....-.........-- :1. a.2 ; t:'csi Iggi -, cp p, 1-, a i ul fa' °2ff H•d.g? ga• o 'cl o o• •-•. ••■••. e•N ...... r. 0, 9 1:1) ...... ....... afRal'g . _ . ..„. . C•2 cr cl) 04,1g 611 - • .,.... .Ca fD 11 - 1.4 cr CD 1-ft n"."'0 I-1•0.PT • aff g9 ,g.mg. z V Elz:g1-.5°0 8- ru" I 11) 51. Fr, /-4 n.).=o co.oa 0a7„ .. -0,,r4,..)70 ii• e-to' 4oP -.a a., 0. Oct.•1...1.2 1-1 F 1.1-8 Fiat as oa. g g at co o ;a. E10' g o o• ro .0 1-1 437) p•4 .. ca • o sPil RB. 112 a' • 514-,4 0 1-4 ro cr ai I 0 0 .i.0 1:0t4 bit . ' R. g •••• •. VDU.) 1,1-4 112 . al co z o.=.. . • o . r0• 1.:.-1 r ..)ru a• 0 1• -cn.1-4C:' cr 1E1 = cl@ q CZ/ [13 wit pu ra 0 .....•0 - Ca al co i .P6 1.21 cn a 'act a) tril M P H = i m 0- .... m c< co c-r E.D. ..i....._ 1 1 , . . . , - __________ :____.___,________._-_ . ... . • ---. MMEMMIEW , ..• :',.. , '- - • ' : •- ,i..: : - : „ . . . . .. , ..., • . 0 8 0 . • ----La......, ' - .—,-- .----.L....._ • , - .. ._ .. 3. Vehicular access must consist of direct access to a road certified as- either an arterial or collector as designated by the adopted Land Us Plan. I Staff Co im ment: N.C. Highway 56.has been classified as an arterial in the Orange County Ladd Use Plan. Direct access to this facility is available. from the property in question. •':- .'. Arteriale are thoroughfares that provide the best service (shortest travel tines) to and from important employment, shopping,:educational and population centers. They are characterized by relatively high travel speeds with minimum interference to through traffic. • I Because of the importance of N:C. 86 as an arterial or "traffic mover", • care must be taken to protect this function. In 1981, traffic volumes along this route had reached 4,500 vehicles per day. Given the capacity of the route (approximately 7,800 vehicles per day) this means that an excess capacity of approximately 3,000 vehiclea per day remains. • , Completion of Wildwood - Phase I across N.C.. 86 from the property in question Will add an additional 353 trips per day to N. C. 86 I(26 dwelling units x 9.72. trips/d.u.). Completion of the proposed 112 lot Wildwood- . Phase II will and 1,089 trips per day (112 x 9.72). These two developments 1. will utilize 452 of the remaining caLJ.ying capacity of the road. I If a subdivision of the- property in question occurred at an R-4 density, • am additional 98 trips per day would be added to N.C. 86 based on an average trip generation: rate of 9.72, trips per day for medium density single faMily dwellings. This would have little impact alone but combined with other developments would, add to the traffic problem. One means of alleviating the problem is to restrict access to the property by-way-of ia 6a-foot right-of-way extending from Jasper Lane in Joppa Oaks SubdivisiOn to N.C. 86. The 60-foot right-ofway enters N.C. 86 across from the proposed second entrance to Wildwood-Phase II providing controlled access. to the highway. This can be accomplished through the subdivision approval process. ' I I Recommendations Provided the Land Use Plan amendment to Ten Year Transition is. approved, the- Pi:Inning Staff recommends approval of the requested rezoning for the following reasons: I , 1. The request is in accord with the criteria set forth in the Zoning Ordinance -for application of the R-4 Residential district. Z. The Ten Year Transition designation applies to areas suitable for urban type densities' and provided with public utilities and services. 1 3. The adopted Land Use Plan provides for higher' residential densities to occur close to activity nodes, such as that designated for the 1-85/Nd 86 interchange. 4. Present development of the area is occurring at equal or higher densities. „ , ________ _. ____________ ... . ' . . . . . . . . . ..-- ---- . . .. . . --., • . ' 4 BEGINIMIC at the intersection of the eastern right-of-way of NC 86 and. the western r-ight-of- , w ay7 of Lormtie Drive; thence with the western right-of-way- of Lonnie Drive S 10-33-56 E.6.10,37' ,,- tn.,'la poin.t in. the northern line of property. of Piedatcnt Electric Membership Corporation; thence ‘sritt the northern Line of PEMO S.89-06-2a 7 436.42," ta a point' in. the eastern - _ --~~ ~h= eas 7,of LTC 86. : ii; 28-07-5S E 68a.iv to the point and place of beginning:, containing 3.01. acres. ' . -- -~ � . - � | � | ' � | � � | . -~- . ~lo_._ ` ' ._, . . - , `. ___^__~ -_ ` - - � - - ' .� �� � ��___�_-�_ ! REZONING RR UEST'CHUCKLIST 1 NRR S NAM4 �:, rant zoning # 4P1 numbPx n ucra '# pe of rszonin#E re uapr�sd 9 I!rs�popP�.1RRd uAp K�'Si�•P�i _ __ x snap 9,�,Etloak 0 Kuln�gr Pf Iota . rPpa @9d NOW gopply �'u����' '��iu�€►�gT#��� �;� f _ .i cess onto stun xopd t1 �- 8Cv �a�.ly'�radf$�a_,Pa�n� an 09 009 wPad iticai erase# Flood PI:9?te Areas Dori _ 'p trey d #n� pFaOa j "n+e Facriba lapd uses inl General Are e�,Ae o rcto�{ T,I t. - un of land . lra oistrlct .. - ' -.E'.' tiff i�•}��f•.'f -- ' - !' { < • I.. � .. __. ... 1 033 . APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION DATE" ."?' ~`1 q ., The-Honorable Board of County Commissioners Orange County% North. Carolina cODMIT SZQNICBS: The undersigned W;11cLor"awk�, tout3L+f ed request that property located on/tax Clap Number �5--" Block number r t.ot number Shown on•the accompanying plat,. wh ch s prasettiy in a District be rezoned tar for the following reasons: • .... , r - Signed: Address: . " 411111*°, .9-2: \\yip. (CO oyes--,... :: ,t arinr ' , L, —a.._ lil7t .37 0 'fir -•. t —%; Vii.•_ frA.L—04 1. 7+ . .,,r• -,/,.....,,'.. 4. „..... ,. • :, .. :, ..., I -t. 0 AC- . 1 • • . ` - ` ter i r "`t.. • .. , . • 1 / /.. xt ff. ff • . 1 *4� 1 I I. [ l f s ea 1 1 r txr aar t39.3TAC. ° n II ea f.41 I .} t J?4C j; i.,.. 1 . i f ff f I _ter 'WS . ArAP / .J f # ND.AC. • -iliznictxt ' - /*/•• ' IIRWRIti:Ziamilt . . ' �. 4 - _ 1 i 1 I AC- a 1 , // 1 TI4 ‘,‘...____:....--e./ ,.. ........ - litz,. RIO.ts.sz . ROM..ilt 1 _. i 2� J 02( :rasz �/ 2T ' of A .' 22.. - f r' 497 AC. i 2$ t: �' f n 9.78 AC '`,�� • :" ORAN CCANTY • - BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACticsi:Aganda: • ACEECN AGENMA ZEDE ASSMcr it 3 Mei=DATE: October 3, 1983 Subject: Ruth Woods Subdivision" • • w4r=o : • a„.n. PulaLio •W' •t X no A s : Inth=1 .im'Ccmteot: amtklist pg 1 Jeff Coutu Taz Map 45, P/0 4- pg. 2 732-8181 EXT. 34T Phone Ntadx.r: PURPCHM: To consider approval of the preliminary plan for Ruth Woods Subdivision, property of Ruth Woods. /MED: The property in question is located in Hillsborough off NC 86. It is known as part of Lot.4 on. Tam Map 45 and is bordered on the north by Wildwood Section I. The tract is designated Rural Residential in the Land Use Plan. The property is zoned R-i4 (Residential-4). There are five (5) lots out of a'I.52 acre tract. The min4Tmmr lot. size is 10,000 sq. tift. with the lots being .24- acres in size. The. lots meet the dimensiona!l requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The property is not in a flood hazard area. f The propose road.,. Skagen Lane, will be public and constructed to State Department of Transportation standards. The tract is located in the Orange Rural Fire district and is aermed:by the • Hillsborough Volunteer Fire. Department, Water and sewer lines wilL be owned and maintained by the Town. of Hillsborough. 3:3VAC1: Development of the Ruth Woods Subdivision, by itself, would have minimal, impact am the traffic volumes on NC 86, Overall, the Ruth Woods Subdivision, by itself, would_have minimal impact on the area. ECOMMENDATION: The Planning Board recommends approval subject to the following conditions: L) That p opezty lines follow site distance lines when they tie into NC 86 DOT) 2) Clarificatt of the location of the tiouthern11ot line of Lot 1 relative to the easement shown on the Tax Map as part of Lot 1, • • MMIUMM■immomr 14AJOR SUBDIVISION CHECKLIST NAME OF SUBDIVISION Ruth Woods OTiNER OR DEVELOPER Woods Brothers ADDRESS Rt. 5 Box 90 Hillsboro u h, N. C. 27278 • �i'.: TOWNSHIP Hillsborough TAX MAP 45 LOT PJO` Fie DieCric� Hill0orough i NAME OF SURVEYOR OR ENGINEER The John R. McAdams Company EngiheerjAlai$ Cal3etjtyt}. land &urveyor Major or minor subdivision, Total number of late _ Typical-dwelling-units-at pi�eden --_�__ -- ---Ta-be-cjpvalapec)-ink phases f-Tafal number at acres --- - ' - - — ---- ar Proposed SCHOOL DISTRICT bills_ aroug WATER SUPPLY: Public(name) Y Hili_eborouuh Communit i ' Individual Septic Tank Individual SEi4AG9 TREATMENT; Public X t -----� CoMmunity i Access onto State Road -NC 86 RoAd Standard: Public x or Private Class A Existing critical areas such as streams )� Flood prone areas ( )� Historic Sites { } Uther - Land uses in the general area i 4 ), Explain: SKETCH PLAN RECEIVED (Oats) PRELIMINARY.PLAN RECEIVED (Date) 8-3-83 Approved ( X Recommended Charigea ( } Preliminary Review by health Department 8-2-83 REVISED P LMNARY PLAN 'RECEIVED (Date) Board of Education 8-2-83 Dan Lunsford Erosion Control officer WF -32- ! OWASA (if applicable) Department a€ Transportation Mebane other Hillsborough Preliminary Action by the Planning Board OrangelAlamance Preliminary Action by the Board of Commissioners FINAL PLAT RECEIVED (Date) ( ) All lots :sere approyed by the Health.Department i 1%, } Lots failing Health Department approval ( } Road Maintenance Agreement submitted are cambiaed or listed properly an the plat (where applicable). Approved ( ) Improvements have been provided for; completed, bond, letter of credit, cash. Date ( ) Final 014ASA approval Nhere applicable) on all plane 6 specifications, Data ( ) Profiles and Sections Received ( ) FINAL D. o, T. approval on plat Final action by the Planning Beard ;, :7 --------7-- "-.7-:.- ., , • - - ' '--- -: --- ' ..' •;.-•-- ---t--- . .-=-..-- . : ., , ,: - - i'---, - :„..: . .- - • . . . . O&7 7- _ . ... ........ .............-.....:-.- „, 2.z.....0.2.1" % *....; ;A. 4.,'".p.:,•%.'--",`;4.-L• .----,,,,-.4".7-: , - -7,:...; :10401* , -...;••-:t-'-. 7,,,,":.-,..,31:...„;_.-'-'-',4'r.d .-'-' •-• _6.'2-;:'-. ' 0 , ,... ., ,1, -- ' • 4516 .4- \ .., i asa A .... . races / . . . .. . ... . . all- . - IC 1°6 -.'' -,':-..;----,_°•C' _ ......,.. -,L, 1.174....,,,, Oaa • afil.Ph 1, -......----_ .. .._ . ,..35_1--•-•" • • L..• • . .Ittr. . AC-'r • t ,_ • *- Et RA IL ilt‘. r IS ArIII:-.:•' ''''-'--.. . -... I 1 - • 040 1-) --.,....-,--._, ,,,.,„ .- -;:2,•:•;:.-,.- ..:....r.:,k,,." - I'''''''.-- ''''''■•%-.-n•-.-.:::1-1.`-'4%-i,C*----t...:,4"•4.-,. '..,`"-.-t'f'7.r.,-"::.,-..: ,s,A. .,*-----; -af 2,5 r AC.CAL- z .----- r-- 1 -.."-,,,,. .:. - - • • , .. .:L.,-,.. I- i 0701 . ..- :, .,.,4.1.-•.•'- -•••••...::7-47' •••-..- ...:_::- , t..- 1,, 656 , .....„,... ..-. AC ;A, ,.'., -'-'.."---`-:,. -`. .... 44.116,- -•,-,:. -_,.„ '''' Is I.?1 . K:Ii. '--,.. .!-.;-- .: .7,:„ ot‘`; . ........... 11 • , . stemrZ7'-..--......,,..//"'-`'.; 1 r , t.i..:. ;,, 4•41, 4.41.4410,404-- --- ,-..5-4;i-Li.7.:•:; ; . • ..,,,,4„ 4. .. ,. . - - i - ""`:.2.-...Z.,,,,, / ... .,.-7-.. ,-.. p ,..4.,41.4,410,4„,s, -• 1,-,VIC& : I''.t"'"""'. -,,,....r ....,. 1.,ob..416,9r....4,74.m...... ' ihirrip. ' t r .1. '•' '.•7 74'A:''-:'". V*4 11"04 I O.P4744.40.474 . %.-.‘7 (DM ' i- 1 1 •,i-- 1 *-110,44.40'4.4-4,44.4::- .,.*, . ., ., , ---• 1 1 -L.:",---••-''-•* Vi 11411144:4,rib-.4041 414t1P,e IP*- '',',...‘ ' I I v'-,7407'0'44Ni7411,7AF 3°' -'1':;44," 404AC. • ' -5Ezt !MAP 45A . 1 / -..'-'-''.. •\-ilti...**-4*$* 4- '.-,--"":-4;4'.1 • • ' r--1 . , ...,-. -10.40.+4,,t420,togorp. 4.4ir. • , 2 __. I .1. , - , -4'7-.---' ' .*4 174,A N 11.■64 1 PA.4"ARP.*at a* . '. .***'''. S 1 .'°'.1?';':':' ' t l'44''' $44 31 1 rill c[ ';'6'4 64■4 AteN 6w4 1I/74 V4 r.#41}01,4'0''' ' ' - ' ''' 1 ' 1 Ti`7,47441",(V-#*OP• **40,47./fie't,41.. •'.'- 1: /..c.1 -- r 1 k. ,,-,,t4t.,4 v.,go v. A•40,:tie#,44:I.-. --. - 1...1 1 .lee 1 i-rt,+.40.-4,1+4,e. 4/4 0;d e 4r■I. '.; *4'" •a, \-pl) I 4...4.4,. •*4,44 kir-#4,4r 447.7.,- 1,458 gip I # _ , 1 t 4,41P.• -. •4'.ser, .„4,,-- - ::,,..#4,--wr it**, **a,. ■,414p.#41- ..." ..2 --4c. Vali i I I ,-l..?;...Fir. .... .P.,411,4t ..**•7.•-r_.+-, ti., 2,9o.44 i fr,•••• 4 1**,*# • •* .41 4-':`Y.,.--7' 7•- 1 —------------ :44,00.4t, it** 41._***•#* -, ,.. ,.--'4,..ip'.."":Rs.„:„.... _-,.....I:42S. .... I '' ooppm cola; 1 5 4.444i** 4311,4" :fr.. ______LLI17. .„.....::.,:44t.„.1,......„„,..;;„..,..„..4,,,...4 ,....,. 56C-37 SEE I i or,:_ ,'.. ___7.-.....__-.c.„., SEC MAP' ...2. ...,..., 1 1 -../..-....:-.1 3 78 AM • _ / I 1 1 wtu3wo00 . - 1 1 ..e. ,. -r;75 AC.. A 01 i ( 64E4- , 9defr . l te/11 4,-h ,4,1* , #. .q)1 ., l.: 47;/ 33.92 AC r... 9 i„,), 4.-•.,"-'.,.;•4 ,',. j•-•,..-...iii Nosamorls , 8E8 MAP 45 C I / ri, STAGECOACH RUN, SEC. I) ...., , • 1 24 ...„F.,., .:..?,........ € ' -,..•'' .L'IV -- 1 3°62 7.; •''F,Z,.. • ,:'...x 1 ,,... 7s,,....... -...--- :ETCHER ROAO ------\ 1 ,1', --- ---,-2) I --- .5722 % \ 4 62.AC 47' 4.- - • 9.79 Az. % `-■ 1 -.- . .. ..:- 7- • .. / • .... ,.„ - - 1 September 16, 1983 We, the undersigned, the closest neighbors - directly across the street from the proposed 3.10 acres to R 4 have no objections, as long as it ia the same size lots and has city water and sewage, like Wildwood I, and all lots of the 3.10 acres are served by a paved street. 0 /W4f.'V 16.47_47te,v. ?41241M' AAA.4411A., , ay744c4‘.. ., deors4v1,14 graiTy.1-./ 1: 0115..): \CLuc\nex LL_Nsi-,Aess ted. g. loo;,445._ . 1 Cbitew-o (1r1 *44111tiv 1,,e( .), ,//./ E.a; - r joppa Oak Homeowners Assoc., Inc. P.O.Box 1054 Hillsborough,N.C. 27278 f 3 a s / 40.422/ t1.0 ,e,:te #d)" /7',965'3 Inv . , ; 6 ‘Pleve9 6 / cv_m4.6,4_ lc ---w-c6."(.0\ 9.401tao kownekkiryi,q04, f 9A-dt (40„,,L(E „,,,4 vejetsL, c4zcutixzr NjekAticoto ,tinf-et ah„,t( mc, ,n,eq, *Q44.. 4140C-:(\t-Q . LILDi t;.0.avict, . i jatc: 6-tkva:‘ z 0...b-vum"a:94,4(ioit,60:„0 ,,,,441thAt '°' I ' i • ( ryt-f*Izik �1 3 ORANGE C912:s717. : • „ • - • BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS As-tiota AC:22mT AGENEA Mai ABSTRACT It E-IS MEE=raM October 3 1983 Subje=t= Biraaar Woods Subdivision • •rt • Pnang • • 11. Hearthg: s • eclist pg. 1 17----;rrtzct: Jeff Cbutu. Chk Tax Maps 111, 21. Lot 7 pg.Z PhOne Number: 732-8181 EXT. 34T PORD03Ez To consider approval of the- preliminary plan for Bison Wooda SUbdivisioa property of L. A. Willette, Jr. MED:: The property in question is located in Chapel Hill and Bingham Townships off SR 1198 (Stallings Road) which is off SR 1194 (Rollingwood Road). It is known - as Lot T =IT= Maps L11 and 21. The tract is designated as Rural. Buffer in the Land Use Flan. It is zoned R-1. (Residential-1). There are 9 lots proposed out of 58.25 acres. The lots range in size from 5.0 acres to 11.7 acres, The lots meet the dimensional requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The property is not in a flood hazard area. The proposed. road, Hawthorne Road, will be private and constructed to Class. a standards, The tract is Located in the Orange Grove Rural Fire district served by the Orange Grove Fire Department, The lots will be on.individuaf wells and septic tanks, The subdivision is in University Lake Watershed, IMAM Development of the Birnam Woods Subdivision would, have minimal impact on the areaschoola lana minimat impact on the traffic volumes on Bethel..Hickory Grove Church. Road, Overall, the Biraam Woods Subdivision will have minimal impact on the area, The maximum impervious surface ratio.: for Residential i is 6%. Total area 58!25 acres maximum impervious surface 3.495 acres or 152,242 sq. ft. Lot #1 5.3 acres - maximum impervious surface .318 acres or 13,852 sq. ft. Lot #2 5,6 acres - maximum impervious surface .336 acres or 14,636 sq. ft. Lot #3 4%,0 acres - maximum impervious surface .36 acres or 15,681_ sq. ft. Lot #4 5.1 aces - maximum impervious surface .306 acres or 13,329 uq. ft. Lot #5 5.2 acres - maximum impervious surface .312 acres or 13,590 sq. ft. Lot 06 5.7 acres - maximum impervious surface .324 acres or 14,897 sq. ft. Lot #7 7,3 acres --maximum impervious surface .438 acres or 19,079 sq. ft. Lot #8 5.6 acres - maximum impervious surface .336 acres or 14,636 sq. ft. Lot #9 12.4 acres - maximum impervious surface .744 acres or 32,408 sq, ft. All the lots in Birnam Woods Subdivision meet the impervious surface requirements. RECOMMENDATION; The Planning Bdard recommends approval subject to the following condition:: Further subdivision of the property. will require a public road constructed to NC DOT standards. Planning Staff recommends approval with the condition that the calculated maximum impervious surface requirements be noted on the plat. 10111111111Mm. MAJOR SUBDIVISION CHECKLIST NAME of SuDDIVESION Birnam Woods t4tNRR OR REVEL PER A. A. Willotre, Jr. ADDRESS Providence, N. C. 27315 Chapel Hill T017td5HIF 111 R-i gone (B-6) (elf-7) n;.,�haa, TAX MAP Pro Pi5tric� NA11E OF SURVEYOR DR ENGINEER John R, Bradner P. o, no 687 694-4329 Total number of.lots- 9 ____._.__Ta-be�-deyeloped_in__ -- ----__-- -- Typical dxel.ling units at present O ----1-. baegi( }� 'q� l Uut ba trf c pp 58.25 ' WATER SUPPLY; Publ#c{;tame) Community pxopnd ,. SEWAGE TREATMENT; Pybic� -Comruut: Ins)iy3di�s1 3C .. • fty4i,�_Ins�iyidysl Septeip tantc X $CHt1OL ��$���� C#!aPel-€lill Access onto State toad !1 1198 Road Standard; Fvbl#c - Existing critical areas such as streams or priYatp Class A I.Rk C �� )t Flood prone areas { )i historic SitEa }# hr C }t E 'laiDt ; Land uses in the general area; R in SKETCH PLAN RECEIVED. {Date)`_ 8-15-83 A PRELIMINARY FLAN BECEIVEA {Data}9�2-83 pProyed g } Ilecstmmended Changes ) Preliminary Review by Health aopartment`� REVISED PRELI}�iNARy PLAN REC¢IVEn MAW Psm i9a er Board of Education _ Erosion control Officer WF 9-12-83 Department of Trensportattop Outer Carrboro Joint plan i - ot7A9A (if possible) - -83 wMebane (if poaaible) Hillaborough (if possible) ; Preliminary Action by the Planning Board -Prange/Alamanee (if poseib ej Preliminary Action by the County Commissioners FINAL PLAT RECEIVED (Date) ( } All lots were approved by the Health Department { ) Lots failing tiealtb Departments approval are combined r listed ( } Road Maintenance Agreement submitted 4 properly on the plat (where applicable), Approved ( ) Improvements have been provided for, completed, bond, letter of credit# cash. pate { )'.Fined OWASA approval (where applicable) on all plans 4 epeCifications, Rata Final DOT approval on plat Final action by the Planning Board II { , is ev 3 X10 �M ' ;3voc E!9 1 110, 138 D2!391!38 "3V OS ofd Viz avw 33s IM ' t IM dVW 33s 1 s> {pOOm�N1'11023 } "' dVW 33S .3v t`ZZ 0/d of � OV 91 dVW 33S area 8L eFSS° ((loom ' ' 9Nl-1-100) -~ �' bMe �O1f � 11 B i l l tl Ott Li'b�i dvW a3s n •�'1 ; 49 is r ti `b i 0 Tit y 4tlt �^c i 2: l 1Z ; a w s 0 a . 1 tt d3SS3SSV g t- '� ! o '1V101'OV t,1'96.1 1 c. dSM1 -H CD rn . •• „ =C.!: ru • BOARD OF CO?4/ISSIONSRS Actica Agelda: ' AMU=Afank MEM APS'imar Matt E-1`6 M1 DATE October 3, 1983. Subject: Bay Meath:rue: Property• of Joseph. 3. Falcone and Diane IC. Falcone P=.= t: • 1 Alta= •••• : ra A s Informaticrt Cbmtactz • Chec I klist pg. 1 Jeff Coutu Tax.Hap pg. 2 rhcnm.Muster: 732-8181 Err, 347 — PURPOSE: To consider approval of the Preliminary Flan for Bay Meadows, property of Joseph S.. and Diane K. Falcone. NEED: The property in question is located in Chapel. Bill Township on SR 1716 (Cornwall's Road). It a knowa as lots 11E and 1.1F of Tax Map 6 and ifir bordered by wooded and undeveloped land. Duke University (Duke Forest) borders to the north and east-. The tract is des-ignated as Rural Buffer in the Land Use Plan. The property is zoned R-1 (Residential-1). There are sir (6) lots proposed out Of a 23.20 acre tract. The maximum lot size proposed is 6.29 acres,. while the minimum lot size is 1.38 acres. The average 1.•t size if 3.871 acres, excluding rights-of-way. The proposed road is- to be constructed to private "Class B" standards. These srandmrds reiquire a. 5(1 ft. right-of-way and an 18 ft. traveIway with a miniusmr base of foul (4) inches of al.l. weather material such as gravel or stoner The tract is' located in the Ens Rural. Fire District and is served by the Eno Rural Voluntiler Fire Department. DIPACrt Development of the subdivision would have minimal to no impact on the area. ECOMMENDATION: The Planning Board recommends approval subject to the following: 1) R.enua,er. lots 7 and 8 to lots 5 and 6 2) Right-of.yway shown for the turn-around. MAJOR SUBDIVISION CHECKLIST NAME OF SUBDIVISION Bay Meadows OIMER OR DEMOPER Joseph J. Falcone and wife, Diane . Falcone ADDRESS Rt' 11 Sax 8.3-C, Durham s a N. C. 27705 (approxi,matel 35 + Y 4 Hear of TOWNSHI #Rtgrggctian of k1, CPrpwq$Jjs Rd-. 6 Kerley P Cho el Rirl TAX MAP { y R` .) tiArlE OF SURVEYOR OR E GI EER 111F z N N Gear a Lave Major or minor subdivision Total • number of iota b To he deve opec- —i--- �_ Typical dwelling units at present_1._S F--Residence base ---- or gropo$ed S/F rea dances s►ToC$1 pumper of $cres 23.20 WATER SUPPLY; Public{name) SCH004 DISTRICT Orange Count`- "--- Individual Septic Tank X Community Tndtyldyal X SEW r +t _ AGBREATMEi(Tr Public Access onto State Road Q 1716 _Commun ty------ Raad Standard; Public Existing critical areas such 49 streams X* -------�_or Private Cissa A !: *There is one small stream ( }+ Pload Prone areas • 8• Land uses in the general area Rest ant a aXng a smx { �+ Historic Sites ' Other ( C }+ Rx #aplapl n; ` ' y n aome .i$ t arming." tract STCI1 PLAN ItBCEIVED (Date - PRRLIMINARX PLAN )` 6- - proved RECEIVED Dace ( } Recommended Changee {_X--) Preliminary Review by Health Dep arma t REVISED PRELIMINARY PIAI RECEIVED (Date) Board of Education Ira Troll' --- - B1LHordwav OWASA (if applicable] -- `s a 9-7-83 Department o€ Transportation Broaion Goarrol OfficerwF 9-13_83 Mebane Other Cho ei Hitt joint aPrannin Hillaborough-`-"`� Preliminary Aetian by the Planning Board _ Lis Rooks 9-7-83 Orange/Alamance Preliminary Action by the Board of Commissioners t FINAL PLAT RECEIVED (pate) ` ( ) All lots were a PPra Lots ved by the Health Department A { ) €ailing Health Department approval are combined or listed properly on the plat ( ) Road Maintenance Agreement submitted { ) Improvements have been provided far; co Approved of credit sash Date { } Final ement a pproved PPrOval (where applicable) on all lane P aPecifications,+ Date ( } Pro€ilea and Sections Received { } FINAL D. O. T. approval on plat Final action by the Planning Board IQ :;;: , a� .•"s,.,'n r.•:.0 a.T.« pg Y C `' .r G MOTE NQ" ! OYnT'EO 0 1 41 • 1 . 1693 adI ,-41.7',..;-. { 'tea.+.." ,.. - 0 car �._ 0 �y%ill\: , . , C 5325 AC. ch.„..: _„ �.✓ 1 ' 1 3 2i.6a AC.: -» ti N 824 000 Jt ;77.P.e.Ac' 2'4 1 17 » r'r . `v,, f, 6- t 8847: . .i 18b7 -• i 4 1 +1,�*sos.i 2 g.-----..F.A.F.F.......A - \ it. . 1) x1.94-AC `. 2. AC. \ \ - #AL:QC.'\ \ .. :7.A711C.,_:,.7:51.7:- .0.,..st 40.,„46„.... \ TOTAL \ '`�, =Warr: ► 2.24., \ 439-^� \ �. .�. r ' i \ a2 \ . rr • .C. \ \ / / i \P4c +i�I '• �� 5 AC.TOT.. �. $ • f/ . 1, \`.. -4..... 40. "�• MAP 439-24, 8° Irr °�. `� MAP 439-2-5 13.2 C.Y� ... p ! . �~-•� /. 1 s r 18 3'431 1,�, j�. - 3228.AC. 1 . AC. r 3#1T ....4%:‘,...\, 8153 �/ - .... ,_. _EC 143AC. x . 011 36AG "�5.� 441,7 ...--• '✓-�- ”".. - % . 2709 9 ..-- rr i 7�� k 90 -If—, p PA 26.E"41V •E.ti 1 462 ; st..mwAAr• coupon. 1 3.45 Ai.. 21.35 1 v, AG 4j...-- . ' via4 1217.9C�LO J N1 1 ' __ 91.98£3 21 1` m 0 ii. - 124337` I �� 1 .. 3tlG.7i 121$ 262 1i rtco ; m, • 11.E ,_._ ' _ ca , __ f r ;i:,:13 AC ) • w 1 C •'dri. i •',7!.: ' •• - ORAN accrry BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS riot Agenda • ACTION AGENDA ITEM AES ' ; 0 1 Its Na,f_17 ITEUETM BATE October. 3, 1983 Subject: Lynwood Acres II: Property of Neil G. Beard and Lue Simopoulos-•Beard 1 ■ • -.t= • Planain_ I Public 11.4•/11111'; Q ntact: _ Checklist pg. 1 Jeff. Coutu Tam trap pg. Z 1 , phms Nuntert 732-8181 EXT. 347" PURPOSEz To consider approval of the Preliminary Plan for Lynwood Acres II: property of Neil G. Beard and Lue Simopoulos-Beard. 1 E NEED: The property in question is located in Chapel Hill Township on SR 1940 (Damascus Church Road). It is known as lot 15:of Tar Map 118 and is bordered by Lynwoodi Acres to the east , Meadow Woods to the north and undeveloped land to the west. The tract is designated as Rural Buffer in the Land Use Plan and is zoned R.-1 (Residential-l), There are.three (3) lots proposed out of 13.0 acret-tract. The maximum lot size is 'g,0 acres-, while the minimum size is 2;O:acres. The average lot size is 4.3 acres. The tract is:located is the 'Damascna Fite District and- served by the Damascus Volunteer Fire Department. Thesubdivi.siom fronts on a public-State maintained. road SR 1940 (Damascus Church- Road), The subdivision in University Lake Watershed- ., IMAM: Development of the subdivision would have minimal to no impact on the area. Zoning distr4ct R-1 LUI -- 22 Lot #1 9.0 acres + ,03 acres (from LUI) = 9.03 acres Maximum impervious surface ratio 6.0%' Maximum impervious surface - 0,5418 acres ors 23,600 sq. ft. Lot #2 2.0 acres'+ .095 acres (from LUI) = 2,095 acres Maximum impervious surface ratio 6% Maximum impervious surface - 0.1257 acres or 5,475 sq. ft, Lot #3 2.0 acres + ,086 acres- (from LUI) = 2.086 acres Maximum impervious surface ratio - 6% Maximum impervious surface - 0.1252 acres or 5,453 eq. ft. The maximum impervious surface ratio for Residential 1 is 6%. All the lots in Lynwood Acre II meet the impervious surface requirements. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Board recommends approval of this subdivision,. Planning 5l1aff recommends approval with the condition that the calculated maximum impervious surface requirements be noted on the plat. MAJOR SUBDIVISION CHECKLIST { NAME OF SUBDIVISION L anwood Acres 11 Ok+m19R OR DEVELOPER Heil G. Beard Lue Simo oulas Heard ADDRUsS Rt. 12 Box 136 Chapel Hill' N. C. 27514 .{919) 544--1011 j 433-6784 TOWNSHIP TAX NAP 118 BLOCK LOT 15 NAME OF SURVEYOR OR ENGINEER ' MaJor or minor subdivision Total _ ; _- --- 1 - - � u nh.ar aF_lata___3_Ta_bO-developed--in----1--- ha4";Tdtal pymbes of acres 1-3 T TTyp ca walling units at present ar p;7opo4ed CH0OLPTSTPj Chapel s MATER SUPPLY; Public{name} COMmP'Iity Ipdividual % SURAGE TREATMENT; Public Individual Septic Tank X -Community Access onto State Road # 1940 Road Standard; Public % or Private Glass A } ' Existing critical areas such as streams C I ( R )� Flood prone 4x'eaa ( )� Historic Sites { )� Other { Explain; Land uses in the general area Residential Pasture R 1 District '"{ SKETCH PLAN RECEIVED (Hate} 7-27-83 Approved { ) Recommended Changes-( X} PRELIMINARY PLAN RECEIVED (pate)9-2-83 REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAN RECEIVED (pate) t Preliminary Review by Health Department - Vernon Perry Burns Erosiop Control Officer WF - Beard of Education Pam Mayer 9-7-83 Department of Transportation if applicable Mebane ) Other Carrboro Joint anning Greg epar (' Preliminary Action by the Planning Board ` Hillabnrough Preliminary Action by the Hoard of Cammfsaionara Orange/Alamance FINAL PLAT RECEIVED (Date) All lots were approved by the Health Department t 3 Lots failing Health Department approval are combined or listed properly on the plat { ) Road Maintenance Agreement submitted (where applicable), Approved ( ) Improvements have been provided for; completed, bond: letter of credit, cask;. Date ( ) Final OWASA approval (where applicable) on all plane & apecificatiouax Bate J. ( ) Profiles and Sections Received { ) FINAL D. O, T. approval on plat Final action by the Planning Board .p . i . 1 ', T I - _ • a r - • 09b . t 7i�.. ce • h l 4 L"�r::1�t .la .r: . •H . •.. �xn, _ h Y. - •�• �. -' .',• Fr.r^ ..j• ",,h is Ira 6V� n r ^ I 1 F C4'A,,.. r.. •.END'- ,.; Sy Harms t53.WITTED 326 '� y: f.,t..W i :+ •'I^ Q MC ta. IR / ' SE AP II BC 5.I3..AG 927 , • /�^.0wAH •'s" �►� t RETLYti ACRES 66- :a',•1 . •' ' ; . 4--3 , ;) GAP r ,,..^ = :;i y " s' \-- '' 614"'•• • SAC ' : �I ` w `:'.r / / kt 11• MAP it8D~ 1��' 1 • :,." •� .. $190` •"�:. � W Car t s.a2 . • f�, r • ` I w n c..) co c . �a2 Ac- t 1 1 4136'." . . »t . 58:24 AC- ---:-.\-41--'. • • I ► , . :;,000000#P.P r 750 AG .+' . / ' Jr . --.0 :,,,: - T- .•+I.3rt• t� 6II8` S AC 7:- . ¢ j. ti S E Al (+an} 4649 . I • nK t , • I BOAR!? OF ComMISSIONERS Action. 1147-,:-.e.a. SubjeCt: Reddy Woods Subdivision • pg. L Jeff Coutu HaP PURPOSE:: To consider a oval of the Preliminary Plan fbr Reddy Woods, property of The propert in question is located in Chapel Rill Township off SR 1131. It is known as Lots 3F and 3G on Tax Hap 1, The tract is designated Agricultural- Residential ie the Land Dee Plan. It is zoned A-R (Agricultural-Residential). There are 19 lots proposed. out of 27.5 acres. The lots range in size from L.5 acres. to 4,43 acres. The lots meet the dimensional requirements of the Zoning Ordiilance. The property if not in a flood hazard area, The proposed road, Stedfast Road, will be private and constructed to- Class staodszrds-. 1The lots will. be on individual wells, and. septic tanks. Health. Department has given preliminary aPprovaL to the lots. The tract ia located.in the Orange Rural Fire'District served by the Orange Rural Fire Department. =PACT: Development of the subdivision would have minimal. impact on the area. ECOMMENDATION: The Planning Board recommends approval subject to the following: Note on. plat that Lots 2-10 have access only from Stedfast Road. Lot 1 h=o access from SR 1131. MAJOR SUBDIVISION CHECKLIST ; NAME OF SUBDIVISION Reddy Woods OS?ER OR DEVELOPER James J. Coiling '. ADDRESS Rt. 2, Box 415-T Hillaborough, R. C. 27278 TOWNSHIP Cha al Uili TAX MAP i ' �H' ls�oro-ugh - BLOCK LOT 3P 36 NAME OR SURVEYOR OR ENGINEER Alois Callemyn 732-3883 Major or minor subdivision, Total number of lots lO To �e__ YOlczged tn�bas + Qe �ber Z ,S ---- pYpieel-d�rell ttg-uirits at xesea of +rogased SYaale fhmi ly $GH001; DISTRICT WATER SUPPLY; Public(name) Com nity Individual S Individual Septic Tank X � --- -._ REATME# ; Public Community Access onto State Road 1131 Road Standar4; rublic ar Private Class A B. C Existing critical areas such as streams { }, Flood prone areas { }, historic Sitea ( ), Other Land uses in the general area Residential - Agricultural 1, SKETCH Pi.AN RECEIVED (Date) 8-18-83 AgproYed { ) Recommended Changes ( )[) PRELIMINARY PLAN RECEIVED (Aare) 9-13-83 REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAN RECEIVED (Date) Preliminary Review by Health Department 9-13-82 ' Board of Education Erosion Contra) OfficerWF -12- 3 OWASA (if applies e} Department of Transportation bl -Outer Mebane Preliminary Action by the Planning Board Hillaborough Prelim i Orange/Alamance wry Action by the Board of Commissioners- FINAL PLAT RECEIVED (Date) { ) All iota were a ppraved by the Realth Department j { ) Lots failing Health Department approval are combined or listed properly on the plat { ) Road Maintenance Agreement submitted (where applicable). Approved { ) Improvements have been provided for; completed, bond, letter of cr edit, cash, Data { } Final OWASA approval (where applicable) on all plans & specifications. Bate t: - �, { ) Profiles and Sections Received { ) FINAL D. Q_ T. approval on plat Final action by the Planning Board - 'g 1.1., :, 099 , "Iffi:::. „ 4...4F- f QaO b96 1 3 //�' /,/./ ; t? /,/ a .;Aa3 '1''''.\ --- ..- a ° t u l ��— i 0 w ] .i I d p 1 nt. 10 o o .. 1 r ` 1"1 'a d d -- to 40011 CV COO a96 1 1 , 400 II. -- ' - i_ViSt 3 A.14&84,. .P9 \ 1 w Q.. � °` a �' u7 O!ax ° r. ,5,a • 1 '000000011101111- . :--1011 // ocre- I \''' w Q CT ' m ig N h 0 ) N s S ■ S.1 CL to to I , n cri 14.I \• 1 to 01 oi I000,-1 W `r ! ^ w I >; ti .. ?/ . , mEmmgG mu= October 3, 1983 Phone Numimr: 732-81::ff Coutu Tax Map 8 lot 32 Ills PURPOSE:- To consider approval of the preliminary plan for Lawrence Summey subdivision. The propexty in guestion.is located in Eao township off S.R. 1554 Miller Road. NE6111.7. It is known as lot 32 on tax map S. The tract is designated Agricultural-Resideetlal in the Land Use Plan. The property is zoned A-R agricultural residential. There are 3 lots on a total of 6.3 acres. The property is not in a flood hazard area. The proposed road, Summey Lane will be private wad constructed to Classic standards. The tract is located in the Orange Rural, Fire District and is served by the oran e Rural Volunieer Fire Department. The lots will have individual wells and septic tanks. Road meintenInce agreement submitted. IMPACr: Development f the Summey Subdivision would have minimal impact on the area. Recommendation: The Planning Board recommends approval } MAJOR SUBDIVISION CHECKLIST ; NAME-OF.StMDIVISION Wilmer Lawrence summey OWNLti OR ppVgLOPER Wilmer Lawrence SWW e t ? ADDRGS$ -Route 1.Box 355-C' Hillsborough, No Carolina 27278 _ TOWNSHIP TAX ' 32 Fire Witrlct NAME OF'URVEYOR OR ENGINEER Aloie Callemyn Toral-nUDIM-ti t-JioCtB �--'--.._..._...Ta d S coed i .�s a$� e} Ta W nul ez o� perp s_ s;3 ! Typical dwelling units at present or prOpt1se43 ri :. ' MATER.S,UPPLYt Public(name} Gbmmunity Individual x SEWAGE-TREATMENT1,Public ` Com. unity Individual Segtdic 'tank x' SCHOOL DIST4CT Access.anto State Road V Road Sthndard-# Public pr f'rivata GIaOS A , B��, C Existing critical areas such as streams (X '�t Flood prone ;rreas pl atoric'sites ( �t Ather ( }, EspU4: 1 ,band uses in the general area: Wooded SKETCH PLAN RECEIVED (Date)_ June 3, 1983- Approved { } Recommended Changes ) � PRELIMINARY,PAN RECEIVMM (Dat ) 28, j923 RVISED LIMINARY $LAN,RECEIVED (Data) Preliminary L Y Department, -Doug Holy£ield Sa/a2 Erosion Control Officer jg1r,183 j Board of Educatioft 7/29/83 Dan Lunsford Department of Transportation 1' €WASA .(if possible) 1 Other Mebane (if possible)- € i Hillsborough (if possible) i •-Orange/Alamance (if possible) Vreliminary Action.by'the Planning Board.' ' } Treli�inary Action by the•'County Commissioners ' ! FINAL PLAT RECEIVED.(pate) ' (. All lots Were approved by the-Health Department (,. } Lots failing Health'Departments ap oval. are com'biped or listed ro drl on 'the la I'� P P-. y plat ( } Road Maim enance'Agreement submitted (where apglic4blt g),- Approved ( } Improvements have been provided'£orj •completed,; bond, latter of credits cash. Date: ( Final OWASA approval (inhere applicablg) -on all plans & specifications, -Date ' Final DOT approval can plat Final action by the Planning hoard• 1 ;:. a� 111 +' w+'•- 'bw><w MOW 3 333Y 41A 771 AC.CAL. .. j+ 41 3 8.37. AC. �.\ 1805 2. .. 4.44 AC... `1 3.32 39 865011 36.6 6 AC, 418 7 1 .�\ t �•{=;� r "� r 141�t :yg'�: 8894 R.SAC 7515 39 '�5� !E € F - t � S 47 AC. �`..` � .`I• � 1fl t i� ::Tr�:€.����1�.�4!.'�k••;Ft L.--?!•!:r . .F: k � 30D 289 f��� ~4.78 AC {1 ;c. a= ,�•- w.,: 81 2. AC.- �� 11 884 OOt}'f'� Q t 1.1 y �3 90_ `�V 51 32C s3 32D A 2.06 AC. 2.O 6 38 G. 5��-"•, . ��°�c [� •i�a•yj' )t-c, - _ -'�..»�+,. -_ d,�EA�E tLF-Ht+ ,. 10.9 -AC. .', ! �0�.{t� 0 8340 1'� 838$ 3B 5.39 AC, 1 !� O �f 5120 36 1 1. tr �1. 5958 2049 A C € r), ,!n j� 4 :,1 AC. � :.,.. OPANM- ccs.,-grz w.- . FOAM OF CCNYUSSIONEFS Action Agenda 1:1 ,-- !.:5 "..!: ..- t„., - -- • ACT1C1 AGENDA I A/35TM= It Na. E-20 • '- flEMING DATE October 3, 1983 r'' I Subject: Carrboro Proposed Changesto the Sedimentation and Erosion Control Ordinance for University Lake Watershed. ;- rtepartment: _ pier-thing I Public Hearing: yes X p. i . . = -- Attarent{s) : inforwataxm Contact: Susan Smith '.i:. Watershed Map; Proposed Ordinance 1 .---- ------, Phone Number: 732-8181 EXT. 349 PURPOSE:To review and comment upon- the proposed revisions to the Orange County ,-, Sedimentation and Erosion Control Ordinance for application to University Lake watershed. If '11 mazih. University Lake is presently the primary water supply for the Carrboro-Chapel Hill area. I The majority of the lake and the eastern portion of the watershed :i lie ithin the Town of Carrboro's planning jurisdiction. The remainder lies within the County's jurisdiction. Carrboro initially became concerned with the possible degradation of water quality in University Lake in 1980 during consideration of a Residential Rezoning StUdy due to non-point sources of pollution. The Town appointed a Water QuOity Task Force in May, 1981, following the completion of the "r. Orange County Mater Resources Task Force Report in that same month fulminating two years of work by the County Task Force. The Carrboro Task Force was appointed tio,recommend measures to reduce non-point source pollution and to formulate specific regulations for development in the watershed which would ,?. supplant the imposed five acre minimum lot size In effect. in November, 1982 "i. the CarrborO Water Quality Task Force Report was completed, Following considerable public debate about the recommendations of the Report ii.. and revision of the provisions;the Carrboro Board of Aldermen held a public '2'... hearing on the matter and approved the Report on September T3, 1983 pending approval oflthe proposed revisions to the Orange County Sedimentation and Erosion Control Ordinance by the Board of Commissioners. 1-; I , INLPACT: The proposed watershed protection plan for University Lake includes the following modifications and addition to the adopted Orange County Sedimentation -' e and ErotionlContol Ordinance: ADDITION: . Sections 2.1 and 2.2 - Findings of Fact and Objectives H comment: The proposal specifies requirements applicable to one portion of the County as opposed to the county-wide application under , which the ordinance was adopted. The expansion of enforcement tl activities necessary to serve the area would place considerable pressure on County personnel. -.- ;"- ADDITION; Definitions - kk) Tract t7' Comment: Definition suggests enforcement would be substantially differen. from the county enforcement basis which is by tax lot. ---,, i ADDITION: Section 5.1 - Exclusions Within University Lake Watershed ('-'- Comment: Item 2-4 are explicit in the County legislation governing the program. Item 5, as written, requires a policy interpretation or ,(5 Ue a site-by-site determination of the provision's applicability. 1 '''; , ,.., I- _._ , . 104 it -4, • Item 5 is a stormwater management specific provision which is 1 not paralleled anywhere in the existing County Sedimentation and Erosion Conto2 Ordinance or Zoning Ordinance. ADDITION: Section 6.1 General Requirements I Corm:rent: The Proposal calls for approval of an erosion control plan for every 4nd disturbing activity of more than 10,000 square feet; the County cizrrently requires plan approval for activities greater than 40,000 square feet, Section zja) and b) qualify the pnforcement 'policy by specifying sto water management provisions. stem (d) enforcement should be linked wit • eaning enforcement. The section does,not address the administrative mechanism for obtaining 4:1 qualifying for either•Plan, ApprovalSt:or Exemptions: 'Difficulties arise in terms of monitoring activities, channeling of complaints, criteria for approvals, streamlining adpistrative procedures for the ciirzens of Carrboroetc. ADDITION: , Section 8.i Additional Standards Comment: _Item ei is a stormwater,management proviSion. Item h) is more appropriately a zoning requirement enforced by the local staff. Item 5°s final sentences would be difficult to enforCe as it assumes all property owners are aware of the' classification of the water body crossing their property and the prohibitionbregarding removal of existin natural vegetation, a matter of private right as long as land-disturbing 1 activity does not take place. Item j) and h) are stormwater management provisions. . ADDITION: 7 SettiOn 9 COmment: 1 item a) is a stormwater management provision. ADDITION: . Section 11 - Access and Haul Roads Comment: The additional wording.permits only one,method of addressing the concern regarding such roads. The specification and/Or 7imftation of techniques is not found elsewhere in the ordinance. ADDITION: Section I3,J L Comment: This section is a stormwater management provision. Section 17 Comment: Item i) conflicts with Section 6.1 General Requirements,as it references that appliCation of the ordinance is for any land-disturbing activity. Fartber4. later reference to required plan approvals effectively prohibits the SSE officer from requiring plan approvals for activity less than 40,000 square feet in size at his discretion and under' certain conditions, ,.. • --, • . . .. . , . E3111111■MMINNI■18......■-.-L--- ...... ,...: - . 105 ,:.. .. I_ . Given the proposed changes as reviewed, questions arise as to the benefits and .:., ?:. costs of implementation of the provisions and the overall effectiveness of these measures in a comprehensive watershed protection plan. The Board should, therefore, address the following concerns in their consideration of approval of the proposed --,, changes: -!, 1) Recognizing the current arrangement whereby the County administers the adoptecilSedimentation and Erosion Control Ordinance county-wide, including within the Towns of Carrboro and Chapel Hill, it is deslreable and more t., effectkle to have,iideelly, uniform requirements or, at a minimum, uniformly applicaitale requirements. Variatien in requirements and/of their applicabilire, requires additional staff, time and funding for adequate review and enforceffe.nt. ' 1 .. 2) The adopted Orange County Sedimentation and Erosion Control Ordinance contain. stormwater management provisions only where these provisions parallel erosion control ;provisions or provide substantial erosion protection to receiving channeN accomodating runoff from a site. These provisions are not intended, as a primary purpose, to address water quality, ._ 1 , To clarify this point, stormwater management measures are intended to handle storm runoff to control Its velocity, quantity and quality. Development of a site will generally increase the rate and volume of runoff because the characteristics of the ground surface have been changed. Quality of runoff i- degraded1by the pollutants picked up from Impervious surfaces associated with development. Stormwater management practices,:therefore, involve reducing the ratelof and improving the quality of runoff by detention and infiltration of the runoff. Erosiorrcontrol involves controlling the rate of erosion on a construction site and 'containing the sediment generated by activity on the site. Erosion control can be temporary (silt fences) or permanent (estabIlshirig vegetation). Provision must be made to install permanent erosion control to protect receiving; channels from erosion by the increased runoff from a site. In Orange County this usually is done by using rip-rap at pipe outlets and in receivng channels. It could also be accomplished by using stormwater managemenr techniques of infiltration and detention. The Carrboro proposalecontains a number of provisions requiring stormwater management measures or practices specifically for water quality and not necessari y for erosion control purposes. This implies a considerable expansion of the purpose of the adopted county Sedimentation and erosion control p9ogram and would require substantial review of existing staff 1 policies and procedures and capacity (staff and funding). The Town 1 Chapel Hill presently administers their own stormwater management requiremenIts through their engineering department. This arrangement permits a more comprehensive and efficient approach to the stormwater management issue as Staff is assigned responsibility to review deirelopment- impacts by site and area verify design calculations and field-check installation of practices to meet the intent of the provisions. Some local governing bodies have adopted combined stormwater management and erosion control. ordinances. This istia reasonable approach where the local body has established personnel sufficient for the implementation and, • , particularly where the provisiorsare uniformly applicable throughout the jurisdicti1 jn of the enforcement agency. Orange Cout is presently developing a stormwater management ordinance to be applicable unty-wide. At present, the only stormwater management provisions in place are those associated with performance standards for approval of non- residential developments generally. Those stormwater management measures necessary for erosion control are routinely enforced by the Sedimentation and Erosion1Control division. until such time as a county-wide stormwater management ordinance is developed and perSonnel assigned to its enforcement it is questionable whether the County should include these provisions in the erosion control ordinance. . .. BERMOOMMW ----,— , ' - • 1 t3 3) Certain provisfonain the proposal are generally contained in and enforced throug the ZoningrOrdinance or Land Development Code. These provisions include open space requiirements, toxic waste monitoring and buffer requirements. Incluion in the ordinance would shift enforcement of Town Ordinances to the County staff. 4) Due to the !enforcement of the provisionsunder the current arrangement, by county staff in the Town's Jurisdiction, the need to specify administrative policies an procedures is critical at this point in time and not subsequent to approval of changes to the ordinance. These policies and procedures include criteria for ap royal of plan wafilers; screening of citizen proposals for applicability under the ordinance; monitoring of sites for enforcement of zoning provisions; identificati.n and handling of violations and complaints; stop work orders; and appeals of the decisions of the enforcement officer. RECOMMENDATION. The Planning Department recommends that the Board consider the proposed change in light of the above referenced concerns, Given that the proposed changes to the ordinance must be approved by the State Soil and Water Comission before the local.ordimance amendments become effective, staff recommends that the Board send the proposed changes with a statement of the County•s concerns to the State Commission for consideration and,approval and, finally, resUbmittal to the County Board of Commissioners for approval. - , - - - • 107• • - • TOWN OF CARRBORO .0...4-4 NORTH CAROLINA PLANNING OEPARTME T commuNrnroEveLopm NT September 16, 1983 Mr. Richard E. Whitted Chairman • Orange County Board of Commissioners 106 East Margaret Lane Hillsborough, M.c. 27278 1 Dear Chairman Whitted: • On September 13, 1983, the Carrboro Board of Aldermen adopted the WaterqUalityr Task Force Report, with Addendum of July 1983. Some of the policies and management strategies in that report speak to actions contem- platedlto be undertaken by Orange County. In February, the Town submitted the original Report for the County's review.. As a result of comments to that draft we have revised our recommended changes to the County Sedimenta- tion and Erosion Control Ordinance (see Section 8(1)(h) and 8(1)(k)). We hope these revisions and the entire scope of recommended changes to the Sedimentation and Erosion Control Ordinance are acceptable to the County. Please note that Carrboro has adopted those ordinances which are necessary to implement the Report. The effective date of these ordinances will be synonymous with the date the County adopts recommended revisions to the Sedimentation and Erosion Control Ordinance. In the event that the County Modifies the recommended revisions, would you allow us to review thm prior to submitting them to the State for its approval. It is our hope that the County Board of Commissioners will expedite this matter, recalling that the County has already reviewed the Town's pro- , posals and has indicated. a broad support towards the Town's effort and towards the shared concerns of all governments exercising jurisdiction over the University Lake Watershed. Please advise us on the method in which you wish to proceed. Sincerely, 1 47 1 Robert W. Drakeford Mayor JPD/jes xc: Kenneth Thompson County Manager P.O.BOX 337 WEST MAIN STREET,CA R REIORO.NORTH CAR OLINA 27510 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EmPLOYER _ 1211.1.11111..■. ., I . • : • .. . 1 0 . op- I th'1.1'3'.el Hil I -;;.,:."1..,:.,h 11p.,...., ,. --, ' .13•Ing ,....1 IT,f p. P. \ 0 ' .....„ --- _. % ,••• • '4,11 HI ,-.4,.,:,,T,i,i, V*„. :' ..t }:zsts7;4 b. . , .It,- -.' i .. , „.„. ii c ,, : . A /,,,, 4 Ililir " 1 1671! 1 •" 77'740'.; ,r,,.: ..: ' -.......'7,7: ?.I.,,- 1111 .•.•'.- - ,,,,,,„.Q.,,s,,,54 , 7 .._„/- •"...*,$..:,,-4 :"-.!'"'/Tri ' ,_.,.,1'' ‘.,:4,17,44.: IX ,.'e • -Vo•-,,I,,,,--if •4 1 1 4 i . 4,, . c.' ..f..-A•iN.Z4i1/44'''' ; j'i.ilk - .'t' ' ' *''4".7'''; 1 - ,....,,z '.47";•lf ,,', I..''......1, w.:, b.;Att.,,,--i., . :.s..,Z.N.,,, . g„..••,...:,.„,,,& ,,::,,4..;:ii-N:- II i 1111 • IIII 1111101,e4\.,,i. .....4.11.0:,....,li,,,-4:•,,,...,...:46_„ti,-.7*_.+47.4";:st.2 .11 ., ,,A.,,,,,. 7:-.1 n1,4,0,04-''',''1';.31,Lt(t.f.,„;$;s:;e41.7.1_14-• _,i_024:*$.4.:4:: 1.."- etv, 11.-5-qe,Irgir tett,:"Akcft:P..,•VSKT.4::.V::5W. „,,,AT,„,,,,,,,;•..... „ -..,',_:1,,,,:,:.p.,• . ,,,,,.. ,,,, , , .....;,;,,%$, ......• ;,..•:-• ,,,, - • f_t*11141101) I '44 . ta.r ,I s ..T., .40.' .'• ,,a" Jaa:,, ,'''''',. '''''''..' ,:d.K.f.4. -- ii,'910.: V 1 -.0';;,,.„1.1.,,. -Ill:: -:tift;7' ._,. ,',: -'''„,,V, • ,;>•:„_cli,,,,,, „.,,,:;:a0,,Vf --L.''• ,r.f. 7 I iI • ,• 1.,.•/.-•St...„.• ,,..1''‘!.:4 41 i gq.•:, raj,,L1 0,..1.1:;,:v-,--,i v.' ,. • .OF:''''477= :.71:10,-4,447r.:,:,/1..' .7■ i'''' , .0-:;.A,),'- .h...,„ -, .--7742--- B II* .!"'"'•',.1-:7- • :4.,' 44 ,34:401 .0!* 4. . : -t-- 1 !E4sfr I.15,„ .xm , yo. ,,:., .,,_. ,. ,,,,y,::;, ,. • VP Wit.,,,H'•:•,', , Air tr.'. .7",-14V,1- • - . 7.-1 , ---1 I „_ 1 '4,4.14,--.:',,.4.fir-.• ...:.... „.:45:4,,:.„..,Ii4 --,,,,,,., E,...!:,. . ,:z..-:-14Ez,...g ::,,, -- ...- :-.-----• ,.., •c:Ott:',,, '''''' ' fi',..-'4-;A%gep,...,... -. ..:,::-.:---:-.f 4:.„: .. , s'Ar .44' _.,":4--;,,Hrir:V.: i•L"-::::-: zy,,,-11:4•_,7.-,:f,'"4. .a„,, ---.4 :-2-::: . I / 8.B2 :ei, 4-v,:+as, '' Ar,_,; ,., .... ... 141fg t'''';.S-T-5S "::-• 'iri...--d+P-Aq.3-7 1",•"'— • L''''" ' L',.j."..1,1•TO-,4:-." w,,,..,.?-7-74.n*.7.;.'' '•tt,h t•-_-:::: ___"--:-..::•--71:::.-"q:gra.eliM..-s•7*-4,-;t# VOI::'-:'1:7: :!!!"-;- 1 --.7---; `,W_-,•Tt..,11g1&,:.;V: •,a-kaeo W.'T r-irt j';4p---44._• ----7 • B . I ,,,4-.2 0',gi: -, --,-,--::..e.:•eigzi.-:.:: 4, 1„,, -•„.. .....?tAr., - ) . .4. .‘tal;,;:....I. .9„0..,7«,..."•..- r...:;, .rzi , -4-:.„tr , ,,....r...,r,nta fel • 1,44 i: ,,--4.,-...721411_%;,F;...:1'..&r.'" `i- 3.:*,* :A.:440 S.'s' .,.,..4:1747,r1:-A•t.--.,,-*.fr,...,,,,X-i,07- , Fi"...... ,. ,., - t -Tr Z'... «. , •rx..- .,% -t' I'V:,:,a.Y'',.. ..,-ry 4 -- ,4,:&,-,..S. .,. ,1_',..•.m.i....., g,,,,,I, ,,,, ,g-,;:. ----.. I --- --........„......._ .ON);,.."-0:4-6-4,...w:viL. ...`-' ..,-.c.str,„:405.g.t-,.., .I.fr•;.;...4 t., c-----------.1.--- L„AND OS E PLAN , i .. , PLAN CATEGORIES: •F":"A„ URSAN ette puBLIC INTEREST AREA Z,RU AL 10 YEAR TRANSITION I I WATER SUPPLY WATERSHED 0 Ru L 1 20 YEAR ITRANSMON ACTIVITY NODES: 0 FR PC !COM RURAL SUFFER 121 COMMERCIAL TRANSMON C> EX^Tr I po_vi RURAL RESIDENTIAL E3 COM./INOUSTRIAL TRANSITION 1____JAGRICULTLIRAL RES. € RURAL INDUSTRIAL SERI: * \- I • ' . 1 1 1 .. , 1 ••• i ..... . . ,. mormarly y„ r a r•»a fi ...•.--4.1-.1..',.. ' 'w .. .' �i" ^...,-•••!......,,,...--''''. i. r r r.-VV.i.- r': £ r4..!.„r - ^ :.:... „^,. 3 w: 1-rc.Atik1 } sc.+ , 3 u. ... y r, ..'•:. 3& .mac ai— J ti sr; sr ., r a 4 '...' : x :. `w ti n 1 WisR 054P/Dv, x 7/13/83 • .. i • I 1. APPENDIX A PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE FOR THE CONTROL OF SOIL i C i.: EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION i 1 1 : 1 ' l I � 1 1 1 j i 1 1. • f r .:x a• ? I I • L”' ✓^ a"'•k 7 r t1Z.' W r'~r 4 1�a it`,- ', 't` iTx».+»'+ ,, �A .: f i r” r~ r ,.t'..t y,�"`t .a„ 4 f R? ,-nry r f'.''rr"1 S :;".4i•C t;; ".hi-'r . 1*,'IC �' .y YY +3- Ji .f rff 'f-�•y ''''qt::.;`.`;„-7 .. '^y ` .j"`•'4. Y "'a -" ' +'f,.. v` .h ;, rp s � I- n" tr€°�' v�„d• :S'}.. �•`TP+ ++.4'n; rw • ;r.- e. S�, .y �,.+;•, ° .r 3 - ,.e t Z'2 .yam. s ; 6'r ' 4•;.ta*''''''.+�.„ ti Yr ryart>,;-.f.a'.f.3. 7 '^"»S'-„t�'"L "Ys .^.. r- JYS rc""+ t.S�,,F w.k,.,.'� yc _ tir�"1 .,f �•.y TM ,,i�i+?' ''f -41;,y,r�aw .a i + : n„ z ` "�kti ;' ' ' ' �-``-^p' � 1 (� | -�-�~~ ==' - ==-� -~- �� '^r- ' �~r2 _~` _-__^__� , : • ' __ -_- _ � _ • .. - ��j A-I I ' | � '''A 1 ITEMS IN ITALICS INDICATE ADDITIONS TO THE ORANGE COUNTY ORDINANCE. THE ORANGE COUNTY ORDINANCE AS IT EXISTS IS SHOWN IN PLAIN TYPE, .'. � . � // WHEREAS, the Cu Commissioners Orange County, North Carolina, ' � i recognize a great need to control soil erosion and sedimentation and those - | ��� ; activities which result in erosion and sedimentation within Orange County ' ' and within areas affect* the county; and i HHEDEAS* the North Carolina General Assembly, through Chapter 392 of the |' ' . - Session Laws of North Carolina, 1973, and other laws, has delegated to i local governments the power to control such erosion and sedimentation; and ' !' f* . '8EAS, Orange Commissioners desire t exercise such power: �. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the County Commissioners of Orange i ' � County, North Carolina. ' ' ' Section 1 Title ' ! -- • | This ordinance may be cited as the Orenge County Soil Erosion and Sedi~ qenro`npn Control Ordinance. | / � ,. Section 2 Purposes i > 'e • - H T0s or��m� �� ���d 6� t� ���� o�� '' 1 (1) Regulating the clearing, grading, excavation, filling and � '.,... | .. manipulation of the earth and the moving and storing of waters i in order to:' control and prevent accelerated soil erosion and 11 '- sedimentation, maintain the balance f nature, prevent the | obstruction of natural and artificial drainageways, inhibit { ' flooding and reduce the undermining of roads and other transpnr~ / ,''I tation facilities. | ` .� , . '�'. ` (2) Establishing procedures through which these purposes den be fulfilled. / --.^ Notwithstanding the = =� u herein,i 1 f Section 5 herafn the Board �� of County p ,o County hereby declares its ~' int�nt that �7l of the 8epa�tments and aVencias of 0range �ount�° '' .' its contractors and subcontractors shall comply with the regu- ! ' lations set forth in this ordinance. ! � :111 i '� 11 2~y Fact Rebating to 3oth����n and E�^�o :.�� kit���UoJ�u����y Lake, ! | 'The County cmm»isa.zo / . and -- - __-- _-^ the -e.~^ � nacctsoud uiCc have s uii4uznzumv heath. 4u ! mndumguhc oS u2-Cpzu�uu su�'e6 6y d� U`iveesit� Lake. Mk�c spcciJtcaCty= � . | ` '! ' 1. txx, ~~~^ Y 4- �• 'mow. _. ...... . k A2- E a,�Futants into Unt.vens ity Lake. a. Stanncuaten nuns calrtties p II deenudinxg turtet quality. The pottutant,ts istcCude, but ate not United to onganic and .inro&gant.ic cfremicaCs. { k 3 b. The incttease in nu.tiLents such as plumphonous and nWwgert wilt. i acce.Cenate eutn.ophicationt o6 Untivettsity Lake, advensety a6decting _ . E gotta and 6aunta. 1' ' c. The ,impnopetc chartnaizat%on o6 watencounsea and dturinutge an�aSb. 1; E the Un.ivehs.Uy Lake Watershed mitt. increase the v toc.ty 06 therceby .intcreas.t.ng erasion and sedimentation. • d. The aCteiutt.Lan off the natunat topagnaphy and temovat o6 vegetati.okt out. increase. e&oston by .i.netteasing vetocety o6 tuto66' }} tom •Encteased etos•r,on i: e. the s•ittcction o6 watett, bodies nesuftixg hold and tuUL devtease the capacity aonahe. aaunaadiea to tttarrapant =talc, and harm 6t Sedan `.at on 6Wtthen &educes w te& qua.i tty because it �� .ttransponts po•1'.tutan s to the warm, .then &e Leases them I '. in the wate)t as it s e.t s. � ' Er g. Tmpen.vLaus sun6aces wilt £ncttea.se the vo.Lume and note o6 E storunwate)L nuno66. This Wows Zess wa.telt to pencot�ate 1,. into the soil, thereby decteas.utg gnoundwaten nechaitge. Tncftvaaed vetoe.ity o6 nuno66 alsa &educes the 6ittetring 1I e66ect o6 the salt. 'r wit!,e, £ncneas a the 1 ft. incidence managed ad sta ff the ZLevoet6o6 6.Zoods which occult. irxctdence o6 goading •1 1 Secti.an 2.2 Objectives o6 Regu,Cati.ants Appticabte to Un.ivensity Lake Wa.tejcs hed I bke to the Univens�ty 1 =:-. The regu 2a ti orrs set 6anth .ixr this is ottdinance appca ,i Lake Watershed ate designed: ti . { 7. To otect and mainta.i,nx the chemLeat, phy4Lcat and bi.otog'i.cat , 1 quaff ty and +Lnteg&ity o6 Univettsity Lake and o.then eii ticaf~ ' w tenahed areas. i • t A 2. To prevent harm to .the nes.idents o6 the community by pnohib.iting activities which advenseLy a66ect Un.ivets ty Lake as a pubt i.c. ■ water suppt;y, '7 systems and thei 3. To encourage the pno.tectt.on a6 rata at y .. a,itixation o6 these systems in a manna which does not (f impairt. theitt bene6iciat', 6unctiani.ng. iyy! i 4. To cLiacounage the ca nstlulc ti.on o6 drab ut9 a systems which i1� . do not 6unct iostflXJ'•y app&animate the natunat drra inta92 pattekit. v. 5. To mi.nimLze sed mentation anad enos•i.on, within the cu-tenshed, ;:; '"` and as a nes tt, mi nx imi.ze the titans pant a 6 s ed anent and j µ', poteutants to Untivensity Lake. 1 R .'.!--„ <.�1...�;• � ..� i .. .• • .t tea :,. . iy. L ' x+.r1;^y•i l,';F'-ta'^:-i .�+d�`'4'•�r I`„i Y ti � aw rtK.'. r 2 �t s- s M.r Y: ,,, .4-a r•3 ; " ti� I .L.•X. f i _4 - w s.y. s�W+i a o w 1 u3* _ •a ;:F.. .1,. V'� C,, 7-,,�" ' . ��! r -.' .-ef, v 4? J"x. 4, g.07,g6.1, s;: ,;, L k. ..,. .A.,04.,-----..t.,,4 s y :,:,;; 4 .,, 'r C, '4:'� a i ""r'l:- � M. Fta L c it 'r t 4-� '„ Y.'X M S : .�. fr{a . ..14y,::*,;:zt -4,M - 'ir*,- q..r},.... ;4_;!: r :�.,w}4 ..„, 4.. : s. T y . ir .t „ aX4k- R y ' :�:, t X ;:1"., N5� 4,v,„ttt1 gt.11*' ,4--4, ° * " ry ! ,r 1'.',7 j e;i. . • »._.., vt. t. i , ? *., +°' ��!": , „" w' �" — ' .'" - .,,..'r. :.r -"`.3∎,r.x . `:v` .A. ,14= ,.a � x ` i t . E"°yi:L' 112 •` b. To pto.tect and maintain the existing habitat 06 6ish and . . i A _ aadt.i 6e. t 7. To ptevent damage Sum 6too Luzg athit. tecagn.izing that ;j :' natutaL 6LuczatLan.a in =tut Leve,Ls ate 6erte6 • • I S. To pn.oteet the absokptive,punr-6yi.ng and tetentLve 6wtietion.s a6 - i #� l the nab .systems existing in the UnEiveJt6 try Lake Wate�t4hed is atea. , i I . ,'. 1 9. To enaune .the attainment a6 these abjeet.i.ve4 by negwiting •the appn.ovaL and .mp,eemen ation of sedimentation and enozion can.tw i of ate ac t i v.i t Lea wh.i.c may advens eLy a66ect the i;! UU vL J 4A.ty Lae. Watet4 hed. 11" fit.. • 10. To pnou.•ide and en6once design and pen6o�unance 4tandanda 6o4 cantic.o.L 06 past-deveEopment etosLon and zed ime i.ta.tion .1.n onden : !r to pneaekve the chanucterui,atica that existed .Lit the Univene.zty ? 'it Watendhed M.ea pnian to development. Section 3 Defin i tions !; As used in this ordinance, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the following definitions apply: i a. Accelerated Erosion - means any increase over the rate of natural ; erosion as a result of land-disturbing activities. • • b. Acre -- means 43,560 square feet. i c. Adequate Erosion Control.Measure, Structure, or Device - means one 1 which controls the soil material within the land area. d. Agricultural Land - is land used primarily for the production of plants ! • ) and animals a�'�ncTintended for private consumption or sale, including ;' but not limited to forage and sod crops, grain and feed crops, tobacco, FI cotton, and peanuts; dairy animals and dairy products; poultry and 1,;I poultry products; livestock, including the breeding and grazing of any or all such animals; bees and apiary products; fur animals. ;l '.. e. Borrow -- means fill material which is required for on-site construction Ili and is obtained from other locations. ;: 1 f. Buffer Area - means the strip of land adjacent to a lake or natural watercourse. The boundaries and purposes of which are as set forth ,I� in Section 8.1h. 1'I 1 tc g. Channel - a natutaL on. atti6.ic..iaL watexcowt.s.e with a de6.uz,ite bed and banks to cony<ne. and eondutt (.Low a6 caztct. j , lz. Channe.L Attenuation - a change o6 .the uecte/-ccvrttying capac.i.ty an Stow altatactet.c.a.tics o a natant at ah.t.i.6icaL channel by clean..Li g, excavation, bank 4,tabc,Li.zati0n at other meatus. .i.. Channel S•tab.i e i ca4i,on - enosi.an pnevention and s tabi..C.i z.at cn 06 u.Loe_ ty 11 th$.z bwti,on in a cluuuzeL using jetties, drops, teve mutts, vegetation, I. alma and lzea meahutea. 3 I• SI , -_N:1"r J�.. -. .a t Lr fa =X a, "" i` Cam 3t,,'." :w 4.. h y,s'"Fa'h.•.Y...+'^ 'ri"Y'h�t - 4 . t' +a ' , - , .-' , T .7tw.. ...h¢,`17,A.mr..- ..ice t-4.— .� :14 s'severi-". ;Ci:.+r•r- {,, J Tr { T T m��i3 +^ S •A . `' _y _• I ',,i.4..„-;:•.,.;:, r,. .. :;;S:,."4,:-.:,..:' ...•7n . .. . ".:•;„.' :'tf . K: f, w . .;:p' l .4.z i.. k -,.wir,ri^x�,Aw_ .r,t° . ., . n4... .;+t r ..,. !s-,w,'.r.,, . < - :'. ' :C"<. .,------- .._. �" "__„.. 113 - .__ ------. .. i I i ` �j1 1 , j. Commission m means the North Carolina Sedimentation Control it Commission. ! • : f k. Denuded Area - any area deprived of its protective vegetative cover 4 I .I 11 ,` and left in that exposed condition. 1. Department means the North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development. ! m. Vevetappment - any man-made change to .improved on. uuumpkoved nea, estate, .1 including but not Limited to con tta tion aii bu%Cdings on °then I . st1uuctwte4, mining, d&edg•in , 'Sitting, gig, paving, excavation on. i:' dn3.t ng apeluutions. i i :. n. District -. means the Orange Soil and Water Conservation District .!. created pursuant to Chapter 139, North Carolina General Statutes. "' o. 'D-ivend.Lon - a channel on a ridge on combination theneq which is constiutcted ac'wds o.Cap-fng .Yard eAthen on the contour on at a. pre- - I•• determined grade. Its punpaae is to .intercept and diverrt .aun6ace flan-- •i li ` o66 belion . g I. e a.cns suligaient volume and ve occty to cause enas.wn N and convey the sunftrce nuno64 to a protected area. �., • p. Erosion - means the wearing away of land surface by the action of wind, water, gravity, or any combination thereof. 'F • q. Ground Cover - means any natural vegetative growth or other material , I which renders the soil surface stable against accelerated erosion. ;f n. Gnoundwatex. Reciuuuge - the ago/cation pi other ..into the ea/EA. it may incxe .se the tot amount o6 urten stoned undengnound on pay • nepten.ish suppLi.es dep&eted through pumping on natwutl?. dischangc. s. Impervious Structure - is any structure which prevents the free seepage , of rainwater into the ground, including-but not limited to buildings, .� ' ' paved roads, paved parking lots, airport runways, etc. ;:; t. Intermittent Stream - a stream an pon t ion o6 a st'team that gouib onCy 'in d.inect nedponde to pntecipitat%on. It receives U.ittpe on no uwten 3 nom spang6 and no tong-contauLed supply 4nam meeting snow on other bawuces. It .is dry ion. a Lange pant og the yeah. , u. Lake or Natural Watercourse - means any stream, river, brook, swamp, • sound, bay, creek, run, branch, canal, waterway, estuary, and any reservoir, lake or pond, natural or impounded, in which sediment may 111111 i be moved or carried in suspension, and which could be damaged by I accumulation of sediment or any body of water which is or would be de- noted by a solid blue line or solid blue shapes on U.S.G.S. topographic , • maps. v. Land-disturbing Activity - means any use of the land by any person 1, in residential, industrial, educational, institutional, or commercial h development, highway and road construction and maintenance that results i, in a change in the natural cover or topography and that may cause or ii contribute to sedimentation. !i ;1 yu -, l. r _ ""Ve ; `' r ""''� s v7a•a.yy}�•,'.w`+. '"lw+ '"r+ "P7t" sy-w, ` ...,s S^.". fir4` _ '"'"-;,.3i:;::-'44,6.. ....,!".- . f '•( .. .i . +.'.» Vii:'i + 444 44 T" r+ Ct" ,v, . [""r- y C .%• . i:M'..=` • '"'"/V"-"r ,,.1 .?" .-.V, „,rt",, rr w `04:4 n 7 r. f F , sYU.....-, ."^G14.' •fi^r d.y r1....w• ,,,,,i.;,..-416.„„... Kv ;L a . 1s w , "' " - ' „ C y"?vrA ,. ,.r-"K S's''. " .y , . " '_ ,-f'-+k;;4. ."A. :;•:;1I4 . r ;47 i;':At : A'4..*: 3•w- .. •r., .,,. ��`` am' x. x yrw. N . x iS r%, :� K - _ z. a .a::: '.; . `�.0714� .h4, .,+ NIOXEIRW ---'"•■••.rr--rrzrr..-o$.„,,ro...-tr...r....-rr-.,■-,,--- ",i', : ' ','',:::'''■*;:i..-■ '' ' '77.'"''' ,:'4"7.'' - r . ' .t..... , • • -i' '1'- i• k'' :" ---- . ' ' ' ,■•■■•11 . . .'... • 114 - •,. .. • : :7±54. — -.„. ••... ''..r.:7:+;•.-..:'"::.• -1;:,4,;;;.,...i.. ":4;,:i . ., ... • A-5 . _ . 1 1 ; ;I II . .. w. Local 5overnment - means any county, incorporated village, town, or city, or any combination of counties, incorporated villages, town, 1 . . 1 , ., ..4., and cities, acting through a joint program pursuant to the provisions I I : of this Article. I L • f.t, ! F: x. Natural Erosion - means the wearing away of the earth's surface by 1 water, wind, or other natural agents under natural environmental ' :"'!'•; .; conditions undisturbed by man. !! i y. Peak Mocha/age - the maximum imotanntaeou4 gow 4tom a given tonm ..f t condition at a opecigc tocatima. ; ■ aa. Person - means any individual, partnership, firm, association, joint ' 1, venture public or private corporation, trust, estate, commission, : il —; board, public or private institution, utility, cooperative, interstate , :1 body, or other legal entity. : :I : r bb. Person Engaged in or Conducting Land-disturbing Activity - means the !: individual, partnership, firm, association, joint venture, public Or i! private corporation, trust, estate, commission, board, public or private institution, utility, cooperative interstate body, or other legal entity, financially responsible for the land-disturbing activity. cc. INsesfTnading - means one of two types of grading, rough or fine. dd. Plan - means erosion and sediment control plan. , , '1* ee. Sediment - means solid particular matter, both mineral or organic, that has been or is being transported by water, air, gravity, or ice from its site of origin. • ,.. ff. Sedimentation - sediment resulting from accelerated erosion which is settleable or removable by properly designed, constructed, and main- tained control measures; and which has been tranported from its point 1;[i ,i d 1 . .. 1 , •.:. of origin within the site of a land-disturbing activity; and which has E been deposited, or is in suspension in water. ti gg. Stavo 1;vtainage FaciLitteo - the oyotem oic ,enteto, conduitz, channelo, 1 ; 1. I 4itcheo, and appuntenanceo which heave to ea-teat and convey oto/maatte/a - '. thavugh and 61aom a given &to-image an.ea. d 1 ! 1 I o i 1 hh. Storm Water Runoff - means the direct runoff of water resulting from 1 precipitation in any form. „ 1 11 u. Steam - a body o6 watet &Cowing in a naturvIZ ougace channee. How •;; may be continuouz 04 only ods. .: . • - ' jj. Same epteooion ,i,J1 the Zand ouniace that .i..4 at tout 1 ...., riardnatty wet, iz uzwItty heavity vegetated, and i4 no/meaty without gowing watm. Swaleo conduct otalmwaten into pitimaity &mange channetz and puvide oome gAoundwata xechaiage. i■ hh. That - mea414 aft contiguoub fond and bodiez o6 watea £n one owneaohip, r .,.,... . , ot contiguouz Land and bodLe4 a6 wateA in divenoe ownetship being_ 1 iE developed as a unit, although not neee44aAity all at one tune. "'.. ,, • I ,i- .1"; • , 4 , — . P',.. .."..irS,;1"- -.4,7:. .. --- - ' ..-4--.• ';'&744.7f4-ViSti -t-W" 2.,:074:A. 471:;-‘,E.,;, ".."407 - IirftiLP,i,t'4;,, ,,r,... . :','-'•r..::-; :t.''';. .',:,e,"«kiii'ry...ieP:*trTet15-5.<7. -4 :414OL:- rr.:7, 11,4;4t#1.15:014 .47;X:Z4alt. .43iY471;741 *iirsill.VOt'VtiareV!,:p..:4' ;PAttY:: . ... _. .,,...,..,;.,,,,,t4 ter,,,,,,,:g.,. .tr.2,..,,yr..,,, ..oz, e,..(.'n .z...04;7.41. ,.,1.4 -,;',i'''- 77.1:-.44.0f1. 4"/".1PNV- ..■"4.;,t'•'--a,."i.i'...rr- ...7.,''‘,.r,.. P0,"7*-:*7:4.7:-.'lle'a4**Z-f#-F.ji"4,t14..t'r'2?4.VA- -7,11"N'"24,'-V"i-,Z=,,:ft7.4,, ,FoT,I,,,..:::--;4 e .,.' ..:•:.?:' ,-.t. .',74'4'.4. ;1',--4*-a...=5 .e=.f...,..7.4.!?' --74:143 -,:ticf4 . .1; ••::.4..;':';''Ir44 ., i -il.;:'-.:.,.:; ::7'..:-. 4st,- 14i',4vOrl'il-.:7'," •70'11'..t... ..741F. ..,,,--4.r-- Ixiar.i.a.4,,oi:.,-46,44..--4,*-4.. ..vg.-.44..tg. a...J. .4•J, illI •,,N,.'.-...,;':.: --, .::0:::i',!,..7..-.".3t::: `,..,.1: 2147614e,v;P:4W-41;1a.' ...'t,14?-!' ' ,..,,,...414&51:4,42-*:"(VV4tt *----...... .,71:*-', 1 ..- -• - — ......-,,,,,,,:,..:& .:„r-- --4:',..1.1.- :,.. .- , , -.-,,,, ' - ,-,,,,-.4„n ::-.•::,,r,,;, , .• :I---, - ..... .., ......... .. 1 1 5 . 1 •-*"..': ' ' : - 1 7.•.'''-.'. '.- - . ------—...._______ • ., . . ... -- •• - A-6 . .. . . , 11. Uncovered - means the removal of ground cover from, on, or above the soil surface. , . mm. Undertaken - means the initiating of any activity, or phase of activity, , 1 • with results or will result in a change in the ground cover or topo- graphy of a tract of land. .., , , • . . . , nn. Uni'veuity Lake Watek6hed Akeff. - compei.sea eat the Land cam eontki- .. bating water to Univea4ity Lake. , CI oo. Wettond - alLeae, that ake inundated at zatmated at a ikequency and goa a . . . M . . dmotion 4a64icient to zuppoxt a pkevaeence oli vegetative a aquatie 1 H . , . ., ti6e AzquA'Aing Aatukated on. 4ea6onatey zatakated soZt. conditions 6at ......:. 7.. ,.. , gitowth and ktpkodaction. F 1 ,... . . z 7 1 l , --" ...1.,-... , ,.... pp. Waste - means surplus materials resulting from on-site construction 1 -..ty..' , • and disposed of at other locations. 0 : qq. Working Days - means days exclusive of Saturday and Sunday during which weather conditions permit land-disturbing activity to be undertaken. rr. Ener. Dissicator - means a structure or a shaped channel section r ' with mec anica armoring placed at the outlet of pipes or conduits i "--' '- to receive and break down the energy from high velocity flow. ..: , .-,,, • 7 ss. Storm Drainage Facilities - means the system of inlets, conduits, r ; , 1 channels, ditches, and appurtenances which serve to collect and convey . ,stormwater through and from a given drainage area. tt. Ten Year Storm - means the surface runoff resulting from a rainfall of an intensity expected to be equaled or exceeded, on the average in 10 years, and of a duration which will produce the maximum peak rate of runoff for the watershed of interest under average antecedent wetness r, conditions. M ... -.... • , 1 ili t uu. Velocity - means the average velocity of flow. through the cross section of the main channel at the peak flow of the storm of interest. The .1 . ] ' cross section of the main channel shall be that area defined by the geo- metry of the channel plus the area of the flow below the flood height • • defined by vertical lines at the main channel banks. Overload flows are not being included for the purpose of computing velocity of flow. . , . J . . . e ' • m Amended effective (December 6, 1978) 1 .... _, . - Section 4 Scope and Effect 11 , It shall be unlawful, within the jurisdiction of this ordinance, to engage :-. -,... in land--disturbing activity, except as provided herein, without first ,cl obtaining a permit as required by this ordinance and without complying with the conditions of the issuance of said permit. Conflicts and duplications among portions of this ordinance shall be resolved ..., in favor of the more stringent regulation. -... . .,, .. t" . 1 „ 1 ' I• . , .-.1.4:"':It-t-!:".:1. ..(4,---7;"--,:-4,-,2,-...,..., ..t.,,, ,A41,7-'-i- asore:. ., ' '''''''-'1P4 -;_'.-,-4;,.i.l.: 0;4-- -:''.','.---674-5Vi'.474.44,"-- -..:Mg40'-'4,,.. '.'••rite4eW.4:' • ' :••-;.--.-7"'t";-•'-' :'-'''i'>:;•:-*r,tf:',4?.i.-'3,17. :%'t4*44.'.-4'.A.1*-M,....Ad4,szi-'.'-., •'''"71 .7'f14 -4:'"7214.14:11- ^•:"..: 113.-;t0' .-4... 4.ir-"-' - * ..•-1-Vr;f15::;:•, I- i- rz„,i..,..;:,..1=.""7:;;;:*itifi';='giP-41.r•-at.....,4W5ir•qt.7:sq.Z.3_,,i5_,Oki:W.:,,,.1/4Zit:k....,.. '17.;:,71;*ZAI.<;',5,-.4,4jztt.te-'.`-'51kil.,',.f,. .,, ,,,art,"*-..„4.-.F,;Sg.,,. -'-,;';-el.,,,Szkir:,-, 1 :''"::-'"7: ::-•'1-'4`."'''''A-'';',J'Wz.'?5.. .if'7::-*".4- 4v;a;z,'•^--.1t1/5t.:17-z-",:ti:4*:-*)-'3'.4.i.C.::: ,,tit.IA'...,.5.r%,..1,„, ' .4.0....74,11,- -00.7-1%;,\.,-A,:ft,ciin:t*.:4,'•41.04,11.-,:*-- -.:,*1•''1.4-4-6.,...,,,,,477. : .,:a:',.. .c;;.i'.,::: :!::,.:.,. .-7:4:; -.4.-„,4?!W--.t46:1'..r.;....V.,*33;i31,;7.Z,;tiTti".!;,»Lgi.,..,.41:1*.ii■I',W*,„4„..._,'..... ,,••••'-7,...:t'Z'aziti",:,:4;.44:F.W.47** .fVf -5-" P'-::::' *‘..-.*; :'.-" '•7--77-`: wi'..:.7.:,,..z..-^::•:,.....15',.-e.47..:4,-'-•,.-„i-v■i.'1,;;;W.,-311-cs.'4,Zt.4-5'-'''.".-6,44"4.•:'.4.34,:ir..-.J. ei4;.".'-'1'-',."--,',6•-`,:..r.'`. , ,-`e4-'....:triott....,,,,,,W, .-ir..r.;.:"'„,.._4g1, -Z.,: ..c.:--,Iti...,,--,- ,r;;;,,.;...,.;',:zz...:.ix zle..53z."V.',',t'et".i.1,•,e't-m?*.,-4-.r.".7..:$,V,A;)-zz--...-,,i.,,,,,tu.".:VVitalzte•d.a",&•.:!,7,..v.:-" -+.,-,r,t,,.'"?.1'-'11*-41..f.7.1kr "4-e4V.' """r-. '-'1'e'''.4""'4" : **-',','L'I 4•:-;.Y4;•-:::1";1/4`.::,''-^4s,',,"IVII*ZE,:«Alari:44-f-#7,114"--tr*.1.34£7*,.e,P4::423-.!..tVitg :f N.TI-*.r7)."r":44f.,44'''Iriltn'''''F' ""1:7■1 .• -A-•.:!--:-. ,..i,,,,....,r,..,:..,....1.-,-,,,....?...,:.r.,..,...-0-:„...,!,,,..1-.:-,..v.,—,..:.-",,ii..:441:4..-• 44.at..„..:'.'A'..4C.1S.-4.--6-.4"■,'Y'01...0..4%,.7:",4,..'''''''ACtfi..te 7.;:it" ,...',X7!"'44,4"7.-■ '''' r'f:-*:,2,'-'t..L4.1',•:',.'"' ;,......',...4:•,,* •,i.:7,•..;;t.Al;,:;'i:;:,.:,—, :'':^'^',..}-c!,4.:,■‘'...,::,"....:"A ".',......,;;;i';',..“X"..,V<"....7.e..—YAst.TZTrii.j.,•":::^724t-VA'-4,0",lii,.., ''''74^-n0....... l'.20-7:,it".'::.'","Viw''':',. . A ,r A-7 11' I _; Section 5 Exc,Cws.wns Within Anea4 Otheit than tinivelu6•4:.ty Lake Watenahed This ordinance shall apply to land-disturbing activities specified by this • � ` ordinance undertaken by any person within af;C areas otheir. than the tfni.ve/4.i..tj Lake. Watefr.ahed, with the following exclusions: a. Land-disturbing activities undertaken on agricultural land as defined in Section 3(e). jj -1 b. Land-disturbing activities undertaken on forest land for the production I! and harvesting of timber and timber products. I,1 c. Activities undertaken by person as defined in GS 113A-52 (7) who are , I otherwise regulated by the provisions of the Mining Act of 1971, :f,v GS 74-76 through GS 74-68. F d. Those land-disturbing activies over which the State by statute, has . exclusive regulatory jurisdiction, which are activities: ``' 1) Conducted by the State, 1 2 Conducted by the United States, 3) Conducted by persons having the power of eminent domain, . (4) Conducted by local governments, (5) Licensed by the State or the United States, (6) Funded in whole or in part by the State or the United States ; Section 5.1 Exc.Cui.iona W4.thin Uni.venrs•ity Lake. Wateir6hed '1 This ondstance state. app.Cy to •cold-distzur.b,ing act/A/it...Ea undertaken by , any pe ion wi,tlnin the. Usvivens•rty Lake Wa..tex hed, with the. 6ottorunzg exe2ua Lon.4: 1. Those undetrta.ken on agfcicuZ•tuna/ land 6oi. production 06 pf'ants and animab I uae6uC to man, including but not .i'.im�rted to: 6onage and sod crops, g/ca.in and Geed cnop4, tobacco, cotton and peanuts; dairy pnoducta; ;f ; ;rN poutrtny and pouC.tny products; ti.veatock; ;.utcCudsrg bee6 cattle, .sheep, .swine, honse4, on goats, .inceuding the biteed.ing and gn.az.ing 06 any on at •suck an&.cz.C4; bees and apiany products; bun a ma,C4. . r 11 • 2. Those undektaken on 6okes.t Land bon. the production and harvesting a6 unbent and .t-unbert products. u is 3. Activities underrtaken by persons a4 delisted in G.S. 113A-52(7) who are 'II otherwise negu.Cccted by the provisions 06 the. Mining Act o6 1971, G.S. 74-76 .through 74-78. 4. Those .Ccuid-c a•tunbing ar-tiatie.6 actin-tie. conducted by the State on the. Lbuted `'1 Str tes. 5. Any maintenance,-aCtetration, use or i p-tovement to an ext ting 4tiu.ct:t i.ke not changing o . ab6ecting quati.ty, irate, votwne., on Location o6 du/r.lace trutel. di4ctuvrge. Section 6 General Requirements For Areas 0-the,. Than LfruveJcaity Lake Wateus Le. I a. Plan Re uirement - An erosion and sedimentation control plan shall be prepare and filed with the Erosion Control Division prior to the 1 .y X•1 4•, :...»r:a.+Lf."'r±te.'.•,'3Er r=-.r^},e's•ran•t t'.�''.`'" y:in y..-,*.K.'..�... C yr e,�",.r-. j .,,'.a fe'..•.^:--.. . "7•i: 'r✓ .}»yF:t,,-e4,. .*.t•.ti r.:+• . ' t:f.c.4'h*v�.y+'_ •..s ..�te. . r ' � �W'4r n � .4p�. y t . tr. •w. 'i i il, -f.,r�.4+-..,- M. �tv*GkP ' .�t �z;�,5y -`"�„A:"f��+d"y.E.4�r *����.r. hr ....s. r r i.-1-sz y « �.• . .? .a Lir..-,• ^yA�f' 9 r -ti iG. 1+.,, , :�M r � R: ;�•S-ea-...i x. �,v .,� � g� '"µ +�,C.�+: f �ZVGuf'?r2 „�"rr. �3","4 ;,r;4' c;.C, � a ,.:". t _C`4._�.d g �C .n',v : " e.r .��rs 4t w. LM �-4t-,v-..rw nr tz.,L.x,-o� rt:t.t` q' . a-:.^ e ; .r 7 T•t + ..� . := n7-;• yT 47:7 11r,-k,,r-' ';',:. • .r p,,t':::: .: - .12-4- ,.4-er..71ive::a �RZ.,s# . •- -z, r1 y ,pf�, . W r1.. 544.-6 4p.• �a 1t, w'j:si.� e+'Z r-`ir.i _ .t. r ... r ,"T-e , f• i, , ,iA • �oY. . rv' 1c"- �, 11+.1 3t I^.r,s∎a t, v�'r+* ' e... ti. -ryo t I-e s.•r F .!, ..t °'Yr � 1„ - g..-40: ,5.:w.-.:: .: 7 } " r M�y «,". F .4z.� .nC" :T :,17 T_> r :,,. . it i ..r.....i rr. . ..: t*. . I .1{- ,Y ': $„w*" 4.4-'^r1 '+;'r a L':t'ry ,a t...;.7. , ?..wa? ...'..,.4:-µ-�'; „,,.„;;;;;.,;tr.:.....-.2�_...-�. r a?t =; y . .rti A-8 . I I commencement of any land-disturbing activity within ane °tlte&r i . w than the Un.ive2a.Gty Lake Wa-teicahed whenever the proposed activity will result in the uncovering of more than 40,000 square feet. 1 b. Plan Exemption - the person responsible for the land-disturbing activity :,; must obtain an Erosion Control Plan Exemption Form from the Erosion I Control Division, ,: prior to the commencement of any land-disturbing activity j tuitJun'aneaa otthen than the Univenaity Lake Watet4had whenever the ' proposed activity will result in the uncovering of more than 20,000 square feet. • c. Protection of Property - persons engaged in land-disturbing activities � 1 • shall take all reasonable measures.to protect all public and private I { property regardless-ofTthe size requirement shall apply eo the areato y e uncovered. ;`- , Amended Effective (December 6, 1978) () ^;°I Section 6.1 Geneicat Requ.ucemejita 602 Ut veAd.rty Lake Wateuhed 1 a. Man Regcwcen�en.t - except as othe'uuiae jj pn.ovided in subsection b. an eua ion and aedunentcrtion c0rttui Dealt .shr.PX be Eko on Contno.0 Division pn.eoa any and 6•{.Ced with the t�'c•wn to the commencement o6 any fcutd-di.a,tu�rb.vtg I activity within the Unive1cs..ty Lake Watehahed. b. Plan Exemption - The pe1uson neaponzihee pa the Land-dib.twcbing activity 1 • need not .submit an e1wh.ion eonttot pat .L6 .such pelcaan ob.tain4 an Eiwai.on "• Col tiw.e Dean Exemption Form horn the Eeo.sion Contnut li v.Cs.on. An : ctppeiccctian 6o/ t1L44 harm .shaCC be aubm.itted and ahate contact the name, ' ccdu�resa, said phone numbelc o6 the devePoperc and acanrJc, a deaei.Zpt.on :, cold cbcawing o{ the paopo4ed deveto �.; :: pment arc activity, the .Location 06 the 1. deveCopmen.t, and any other .ut6oamati.on nequea.ted by the Oaange County E+coa.i0n Contco•C 0 I, I . 66 iceh :that ca nelcaonabCy necea.sany to eva?l�ate the pfcopoaed deveeopmerst. The E'wa.i.on Contlw.0 066.iceh. ahae_C �.a.sue'the Penn Exemption Farm .i6 he 6inda that: i I (1) The Land-di,6twr.b.utg activity Witt not neauet d1} the wteoveAing 6 ' mane .theut 10,000 .square beet and (2) The Land-dt .ttucb ng activitly�..i6 not to be conducted in connection Ii I With any o6 the 6ottowing types o6 deveCopmeitta: i a. 4hopp,ing cente1ca 1j b. -Lnduat/r,iat and commeacia.L 6aa Citie. c. majan aubd iv.ia ionb d. /Loads 3 e. any activity -nvotving the tempo2cvey of pevnanent atortage a2 (above on beeow gaound) 06 any noxi.oua, •toxi.c, on luc_cvedoua .suba.tance, .including 6uee atonage 6ac L.ti.ca 1' (3) The pnopoaed Lattd-diastutb•ing activity mite not: i a. a.igniticantty inc.eaae ah deateaae the )utte o2 vol:urne o6 auY6ace i}; mate.A ncuto65• j i` I I . �•�;X�.,..�'....�.'.�•.csi•8r1 f..r ., f..r.S.•�„-y�.;' s. ai.�-r�'""Hr.l+t:7,_Jt C'.,c tZ'Z y c�.•.r�,i_�`cyt�'.-. ',I _..- '�'St_r�C�'.L'.7�.,-x�A I-'s+r-�.'4.", ' �e�H.l_TS.. -+..„-r.r.Y....r. z.. ..:.: I I ..Fj .,t q'�_ ,�tT . . + : z'.,s i{:i:!. :<.:1 ti.k:-v1:• c-} i+ -M,4 z J < a�7 ' .-'. '''' -.1;-. .'- ;L 14:11 . = rcV0�`r;li ��- ]+A a - � P'7- '� �F 4t 3Y�"5<0 yw��x . ?Ar� � � .F" _~J W. >74 �[1`,-; � Y• r.' o ;A•I r _ trtzT c 7 L 1 l L-' h F17 F •� £`.V/ . w�i l. f,L ,',,,'; ,a e y� -r 4 � ' ' 'F� ` K♦�, i : r� St-; f r , r. . c 'F, � � 1-^;„ F.S �t.7 r n J �X2 T f + ,1 o�. S.: .... -:;. : x J_ _ ,. s . '31.. .rJik,;� r. .a- S e �,_�,. _-. J.f•. .r•.. ...:,.YE ?, : • I '------~—� - ��- ..1 11m �-- - _ _ ~ _^___' -- ' ....... _-- ' ` - ' . - ! A-B ``/`t, .� . i ` � � � . `' . � i . �/ �| �.� b. �� | ' / ' m~ have ig impact vuawc�unu, umto�cou�,e. . . o^ uxivmz ' +a"° ' ' �• � d. uccu« oi� ao hu�6u� o�oa uinoupueri6ing Umlvm�ity Lake. | .� - C. Pxmtuc^iuo engaged in � nd-d� �3 .� ' 4kaCt take xt�fLuuaomzbee^meumu«uu to i« 'such TY ue6 au%ivit[uu. "� �equxAummst4bo�� azpty : tO ' � �tea. to 6udiAtuit6od. ; ` � ' Section 7 Basic Control Objectives ' | . Iiii The basic control objectives which are to be considered in developing and | il � implementing an erosion and sedimentation control plan are to: : | '. . a. Identify Critical Areas - on-site areas which are subject to severe . erosion, and off-site areas which are especially vulnerable to damage`� from erosion and/or sedimentation, are to be identified and receive ' special attention, and upp«optiatexitigatiue memeu«oa mxe to be taken . | � to p�otuctt6o�uutoos. � | ;-• ' .| q b. Limit od Area - all land-disturbing activities are to be planned . i , and conducted to minimize the size of the area to be exposed at any • | one me, i! ' �, ' 1 -' .! . c. Limit Time of Exposure all land-disturbing activities are to be ! . '' planned and conducted to limit exposure to the shortest feasible „ i • , time. i ` � / ` [ .' d. Control Surface surface water runoff originating upgrade of !i 1�| ' exposed areas should be controlled to reduce erosion and sediment loss during the period of exposure. " e. Control Sedimentation ~ all land-disturbing activities are to be^ ' - plonne" ant oon~uota" so as to prevent off-site sedimentation damage. . ' � f. Manage Storm Water Runoff when the increase in the peak rates and | velocity of storm water resulting from a land-disturbing activity is • �� . sufficient to cause accelerated erosion of the receiving watercourse, i ���.: •� plans are to include measures to control the velncjty and rate nf ' | '' ' re]eane at the point of discharge so as to minimize accelerated erosion `^ � of the site and increase sedimentation of the stream. • `, .� ' ' | . Amended Effective (December 6, 1078 and April 8, 1980) | � � , .+` Section 8 Standards for Land-Disturbing Activity . . ^ . ! �' • No land-disturbing activity subject to the control of this ordinance shall ' . ' be undertaken except in accordance with the following standards: I . � a. Buffer Zone - no land-disturbing activity shall be permitted in ' proximity to a lake or natural watercourse unless a buffer zone .� r width to confine visible' is 1ded along the margin of the watercourse of sufficient �tion within the twenty-five � J i � the buffer zone nearer the land-disturb�ngao� v , /' provided, that this subsection (a) Shull not apply to a . ' : ' , | ' | `.! , ` ____ s . , _ _ `� 11� l ! A-10 !i,i. • land-disturbing activity in connection with the construction of facilities to be located on, over, or under a lake or natural watercourse, -� b, Graded Slopes and Fills - the angle for graded slopes and fills i shall be no greate—r than the angle which can be retained by • • vegetative cover or other adequate erosion control devices or struc tures. In any event, slopes left exposed will, within 30 working days of completion of any y phase of grading, be planted or otherwise 1'1" ; provided with ground cover, devices, or structures sufficient to =1 restrain erosion. • c. Ground Cover - whenever land-disturbing activity is undertaken`i � on a t— ract comprising more than 20,000 square feet, if more Hi ' ! than 20,000 contiguous square feet is uncovered, the person conducting the land-disturbing activity shall install such :I sedimentation and erosion control devices and practices as are ij sufficient to retain the sediment generated by the land-disturbing activity within the boundaries of the tract during construction I� i upon and development of said tract, and shall plant or otherwise :; + provide a permanent ground cover sufficient to restrain erosion , after completion of construction or development within 30 working days or 120 calendar days following completion, whichever period is shorter. Amended effective (April 8, 1980). t d. Desi'n and Performance of Control Measures - erosion and ; se�imentation contra measures, structures, and devices shall be '; '" planned, designed, and constructed as- to provide control of a so y ! . accelerated erosion and sedimentation from the calculated peak 4 rates of runoff from a ten-year frequency storm. Runoff rates `-. I shall be calculated using the procedures in the USDA, Soil Conservation Service's, "National Engineering Field Manual for k .. Conservation Practices, or other calculation procedures acceptable ;;, to the Erosion Control Officer. Runoff computations shall be based on rainfall data published by the National Weather Service for 1 the area. !, l: I Section 8.7 AdcUJ onne S.tcuidatds bon Land-Diatun6.ing Activity in Univexs.i.ty ! r Lake Watehshed ; The phavca cpyta a6 Section 8 ahaCe appQy to Qand-dia. 1 L. 1 the U,t.Lveh.6.i.ty Lake Watenafted. In addition, the de4.{g, cof timet on and 11. ma ntenance o6 dnairtage systems .in deveeopments within the U+tive/ JJty Lake I ' II Wate/tshed dlarJ aeso be cons.i3temt with the So.Leow.ug �atandands 1l.� htitrtdands ah e ca,tt�cae -to the extent that they cute mono neb and these ! those bet 6ontlt in Section 8. #fictive than I1 a. Ct,atteen Rutta, , - charuteCut /tun f ' t 1 •e pao u. .c,te•. Rwto66 sha.Ce be /touted tit/tough sc�a.eeat a d otlten shale ! `'+ 11 4ystems deo.igned to ,inc/Lease -time oS concentta.tCon, dec•tease { veeoci.ty, autctease .itt5•ic;ttativn, aeCow suspended so.e ds to settee, and .ternove po.�eutan.ts. ff b. A tteration o Wste t coup s es - tut.tutae t�-ten couna es s! 1 III aaCC not be. •t'•ge•, clue, o vegetmczon, deepened, widened, atlaightencd, .� .s•ta6 ed on oche�4iae �tuced except in acca/tdwtce tui.tlt wt i r il s•'-.?-c� s-•,,.7. , 7--'1 c d *'�'`X` r!' -V ,i-;, �.,�a`y.7 ,),_ - " _+ ` i -.. _. fir.+'* r" "• . f" j'� � "' r�+�4�ia C r�(� ill .4••p+ � „ . - "' , �t'f~ # � �,-,.--•y .3+ ♦ tr.4 yy . y ,M . 2� ov � n"� � .. .- ,0 ' �=r• + '-: r •..v ( i FL1� _. _ . -. E" n _'Cr^ ti. �;� ' ~ � ^•y',`�K_ .T `:: 1 „,j i ,.:!i•`�4=,: ..rs r,✓2,, . _-� ,.w- fsrs w�Er-v�.;� y,,i .7,177.. M I • t u• -- _ — __--- �...:....mow:,.. a-.�. - .. I W - / 120 v *' 5. ap appn.oved ews-ion contn.o�. plan. Ulster alma be net-wined ned an I detained be6one it enters any natunai wate&e.ounse in order to ! esenve the na.tunaL hydro-dynamics o6 the wttencounse and to S1 J • ppnev en.t 4 edime station. 3 t c. Lunn Land-9.isturbing Activ.itc - the area o6 dis.tunbance by j l 6. development shat. be as a ,, ' a.b pnaeti.cat. _ d. Land Alte/a.tion4 - no gnading, cutting on 6.lLLng ohatt be commenced wtti l env ion and sedimentation#can coat#tat devices have ! 3 ben i►�a.#a2Ped between the didtunbed area and uxrten bodice, uxitene.ounsea, we.tCands, on adjoining grope ,ties. e. WetPand Pnotecti.on - wetPatds and othen water bodies shat not be I, used as sediment traps duiti_ng development. it Maintenance Re uin.ements and Responsibit ty - erosion and 6• sedunentati.an 6ae.A1,ct<.e4 shalt neci.eve regu.Pauc. mai tefuuice .to ensure ,1 that they continue to function propelzly. Tempanary basins ;i ; L. shalt be eLeaned out when they are bitted to 6i•6ty (50) percent t t' 06 their design capacity. g. Antti6.ceia t W tereounses - any anti.6ie.Lat. watencounsa (where .the ,�: need is demonstrated) what# be designed con4..i.den,ing soil type 40 'i� - that the vetoaity o6 6tow is tow enough to peevent aeeeCel�ated e1W4.iDn. ii 1 h. Su46eft A/tea. Requ/temen>ts - soil and poUutants cavLied ovenLand, i, pn.cmani_y 6nom /toads, traits, and/on Land-disturb.c.ng activities, ! can be e66eetively #napped by .eeaving a ne.�a.•tivety undistuAbed ) strip o6 vegetation pa/atta and adjacent to the uxztencow4se. Pno en2c managed ove Land w ten 6Low can be d.in.ected into this �I; bu6ber cfvicea a manner that wU /teduce velocity and cause EE dispe+w.ion o6 the usatee.. Sediments crannied by the iuiten Witt 1 settle out as a nesutt o6 this slowing and diapenzion process. The width o6 these bu66en areas shall depend on the type o6 stream , I on. dna.iuuige area. The width o6 the bu66en stn.ips aha t be as 6oteows: 1. Cneehs and t tbutrn.i..es - (i.e., penmanen.t s tneams 6tow.ing d.tee tty into UnkveAs.i ty Lahe and permanent streams 6towu:g , into such streams). Measuae aeong a tine nunn:ing penpendi.cutan, to the edge o6 the 6loodp.Cain (or i6 no�6 oodppLain has edge demarcated, the center- o6 the stream) 6�6 y 6 6 edg o6 the 6loodptain Ion i6 no 6toodp.Cain has been demanca ted 6nom . the edge o6 the water) plus an add.W.ona- distance equal to: h x slope x 100 where "scope." is exp&essed as a pencen.tage derived by dividing 1 by 100 the n:i.se in etevation between the 6Loodpfa.uz boundary • Y. tine (on i6 no 6LoodpCai.n has been demarcated, the centen ine (4 the cuatencourse) and a point one handned beet 6nom that point 1 along the above-described perpendicutan tine. 2. Intermittent s.trelams loam, into crcefs and taibutanies. :,$, o6 tleei�tte/ur tter1-tcatneamt6L ty?6eetcsno ia. i cen to#tine. Ii, il e . - -- .._ ` _r— 7 .. .i'' A ` . <-+�.,,7�2.%'-' ..�n t7.4.;',,-----_' t '� `�A I�r,4�,. T- ,ter r;'rf p ry;`^- "7t"r '14-r.:" x5147.7 .v +mil s w S"z r. ..:,�T. ',* -' 'fr, Y�� '`flr c �. G.T�.t:: •7777 1. F Sj a y ti• J r �� r/�. � ra t+_ '•�� � y„ �i'�r}'tq �i�.. �}id.,•.'�'�t.r_ s- `���• .y -.�< .ri3 ZJ'n S 1 i�t1. '.`Y � �`F-i f 414,i� :4 i eta: i r+1 a`t aF h ��-a� w J ;t r y_ i y _- j4 r:..- ,,r�y ,may �.�"i �Fy.. �i*: •. t 4a � F4 i<" t�--y:`C4+..�.y..,r'` T co-Tg?�`-L.�^�` 541,ri ti7`!Erma �yF+.Re. . `3 � ryh .. [r'y ':S "' .�.'� �.r f .,.r:"�!W"'.r1<>` T'�.'=7777 y to;%:�'=".':c,.,',.•r 'S'rbr'-..ti aa... i.�v..Tu�"_!t,--r�'.'� .Y' i >j- }y�*act. yr•. . ',1 9..„.y' ,, ,a r , i-c?T ;;.,. .* 'tiv• ,,. _,,i,.0 T"`s, ,,,,,,l� t>• r �: 1, -,::•`,:••J t% 7 n. ., , g .'S, i. i�r t tc r .. d S e Syr . ':``! .,T e -�..o1.,i� ~'ITir-. n;•h.•„4:'�!.1isC'_::¢a'rF: "�►�..!W''f _. h.. .r�.-1' i.. ����i,•.q :me; "1T �C �., ,..�atr. l-"'.•^ tlif a-7'"�r'",T C a' ::'rf-•; _ ._. ..-- .. r Y t SJ' 1♦ • II- A-12 ` 3. Intenmitte t atteana gaming dineetty into Univens%ty Lake.. ; ; bleaawt, o-tong a tine tanning pc'cpend-efttat to the cenLten,C.Lne o6 .the .i. .tenmittejrt atteam one hwndted beet 6rom such atncam I I centeml i.ne. 4. Intermittent atneama (�.Coiu.iing into s.ttecuna which ;.Cow d•ihectCy ' .iivto Unn,i.vens.<,ty Laze. Aleaswte a.iong a. Piste rwm-cng penpennd.cu2an to the centen.t;i.nte e6 the isttevn.Lt.ten-t stlteam 6i6ty beet 6tom III I 3 such atteum centen.Q,Lnes. li I 5. Un.tvets.i..ty Lake. Mecrswce along a tine uniting penpendieulan. to > the high eaten math o6 6toodp.Ca n bowtdany (wlu,cheven is 6an.tlten 6hom the Lake) one hwtdy.ed Sent 6hom ouch high wr.ten mark on I: E Ii '� 6taodpCaint bawtdany (euhie{seven is Gant{ten 6hom the. Lake) {zCua an i . r` , addi tLonaZ distance equa.0 to: ;; =1 4 x atop, x 100 r €i where "afope° .i6 exptessed as a peneentage den.ived by d vi.di g j l by 100 the rise in elevation between the high wate�n tine o6 the. ! E Lake and a point one hunched beet 6hom that point along the t above-deacnLbed penpendicaean Pine. } 1 The mist-big natw&ze. vegetation in the des-ignated bub6en cu.ea6 aha.P_E i not be dust.wtbed in any uny that wou.Cd reduce the anea'S e66ecti.veneas in achieving .the objectives set 6on_th in ..th.r_.s aubaec,tLon, In addition, { : bcc66en an.eaa 6tom which the vegetative covet has been removed aha.CC I be planted on at/Le/wise provided with ground coven devices oh. atwcA:i .ea ; ! ,- I su66.ic-Lent to allow .the bu66enatea-to aceomp.C2.ah the objectives set 6otth ( in .thud aubseation. - . I r .i. Sedunent Storage - sediment aha.CC be heta.uted on the site o6 the i i ; deve.topment. ' I I • i j. Detention at Retention Areas - reten.tLonn and detention ponds may be i' used to retain and detain the • c,r.eaa ed and aeceCem ted auto 56 which I i I :` I the deveeopmenct genena.te.a• Wa.ten shall be. te.Ce sed 6hom detention i,i ; ponds into watvccowraea of wetlands at a torte and .in a. manner appicox unating the natonat Stow wh,Leh would have oeeunned be6ore development. Retention and detention ponds 'Shalt be designed so ;I that they maintain .their atrueatwraL integnit:y when subject to a. !;l 100 seat ataun. Detention and retention arena shall be. de-signed i { 4 that ,sh0reeutes are sinuous na.then than 4t'v ti.g{a.t and ao that { I the length o6 ahoneeine is maximized, thus o66en ng more Space Sot • . the gtowth 06 Ci.ttonal vegetation, The banka o6 detention and j' t ' retention arcues ahaLL stop, at a gentle grade into the uxtten as a. !i sa6eguatd against dnoc�ning, penaona.L .intjuuy on o-then. acaidcnts, ,i i.• to encowtage the growth o6 vegetation and to allow the a.Ctefutate ;� 6tooding and expoawte 06 the mans along the ahate Lnc as wa.tat teveC4 pet-i_cdLcalCy rise and 6aCC, I k_ Open Space - the use at dtnuragc 6acW.tica and vegetated bu66a1 1 zones as open space, ncatea.t-inre, and connscnvation atcas sha.CC be ! { enncowtag ed, i ! ( C. Grassed Swa.Ces - dtaurage rut.th un the development sha-LC be accommodated • ; by the rnatwAni d:a.unage .systems whene.vet passible. The use. o5 • g.tasaed dta_i.nege. ftrys to eharunce ucttc;t shaft be enecu•taged. The • vcioc.i.ty 06 -t,nvet to this gaas.scd swr.Ce shaCt .znnnge between 2--i beet/second, e= w..y� -- .. .??..F t1r iiil +y-2, is 4 _ -r "'. . 2• t r '7"' 9L to. '^ ` Y pK LL h__ a?�� �w' rl,�S 1 C' z -.. c ,,r,. ,:..,,,,�� �!�f::t iyv„� ,,. :t 2' -r ;�y�',-nr:___ F��'�„s'��tx��`-'-,•i1�r ;K tire` � -s ��e..f�„� ,y iryr , �►} ,.a ..'' ' "-C:�`k'42t ?s' f. !���-"�^ 'aK.i T+ ...�,�t �TJ^ter.! �Jjir y ,y `J. c.y j r:.. i' ,r.l.,,• r t,�'�'t � .,+ d d —r• tiF.c'k�i r,'ls tir' r..,. ark skr • ' p< t� 4 ', ]3�'.:t �.y r '•�� CX "^,�"-l�"ri � n�.�„"�*� ✓".c�e�r'.+,�"t-� ?,��:n �y 5k-..�i-� A� � .+ 4:tu 4j7., :k'-' ,..r +7` f +;.L.'. .3tk;:Zr .,e 7.r;' ed, ?g: r y ._, 'C•.J.`'.;;_,.'xr . _ I ie a• '"µ "...iL YLef.:,' :'.il`f r.�e !"'l.+s 1,A.ti Ya;z iiri2`;W + ' 4% r-,7= r. I -�.7. 3���1�� �-. '� � �,r���lh y7�:.^ ��1. �-2T' � ,�.��,,,)r r�i•a, er.:I'�.,�,^��`'�f� -..+- -t a � � � 1 .5I:'':?'.k nti:f t: filr�,,�:7-F.i+1 i+ t"':4--:s..1 '.". ^ �, 4,' _ ' .��`4f•'-P ... ., '. ..• r�z•'s' : . ` 4, °L+ ,1 c *.i. ^..P.T r .8a r - 4..i t'-- . - '.r_....w•I..?'iyr.�...,..::..,,,4,-.:.• ,'�-,w= 4",+ r i t1. i .r {� .,nom N fa�A � '"i.'. . _. _y.-, . c, j ti 1 .• . i x,„` A-I3 m, Retention o6 Runo66 6nom Tndu4tniae S.rtee - On aites deveeoped Son .tnduatkiat. putpozea IL.e., u6e.6 invoeviilg the manu6actwruig, I pn.ocebding, cneati.ng, nepaiaing, •tenovati.ng, painting, awning, on aaaeinbLing o6 gooda, mevr.cluuidi.ee, on equipment), ne•ten.tion o.t detention aneaa meeting the etandatde set 4onth in bubeec-ton j. aha.CC be coed to irwune that nuno46 •i.e neta.ined on the aite be4one ? being neeea4ed. The pwtpo'e o6 thib nequiaement t to inzune -that, not on.ey wi.et the e.tandand det 6onth in aubaeeti.on 9a. be met, { but aL6o a meehaniem wiU be pnovfded to ea4eguand the wa tenbhed kaga.ut t the .ep.i.etage o6 .toxic on dangenoub eubbtanee.6. I, e Section 9 Permanent Downstream Protection of Stream Banks and Channels i Provision shall be made for permanent protection of off-site stream banks .. and channels from the erosive effects of increased velocity and volume of • fi, c stormwater runoff resulting from land-disturbing activities. S iI a. ContnoZ o6 'O.Lbciuvcge - pnov.i4ona aha.ee be made eon the carctnoZ oe i dtonmuatet discharged son the typed o6 devetopment az bpeci.4•ced i I below. A4tet deveZopnierut o4 the a.cte, the peak di change o4 etonmuxlten nuno44 ne6ueting 4nom a ten-yea& etonm bha Z be no greaten than that which wowed nesuet 4nom a ten-year atonm on the ', F Game aite pn.inn to deve.eopment. .ThJ.o negwiaelnent ahat.e apply to: 1 1. Cormnet:Riae, .i.nduat,ia.e, o54i.ce, and •inatitutionat deveeopmenta j, 2. Muett:-'6ami,2y ne6•i.dentine deveZgpmen o4 mone tluut 10 unit& ! 1 3. Singt.e-6ami,ey detached ne a identia.L deveeopmenta where mone than i 3 .eoth are to be cheated. E b. Control of Velocity - stream banks and channels downstream from any land-disturbing activity shall be protected from increased degradation 1 by accelerated erosion caused by increased velocity of runoff from a land-disturbing activity. The land-disturbing activity shall be planned and conducted such that the velocity of stormwater runoff in the receiving watercourse at the point of discharge resulting from _. { a 10-year storm after development shall not exceed the greater of: k 1 (i) the velocity as determined from the table in (F) of this rule, or ' (ii) the velocity in the receiving watercourse determined for the i`• 10-year storm prior to development. , If conditions (i) and (ii) of this paragraph cannot be met, the channel i i below the discharge point shall be designed and constructed to withstand the expected velocity. . 1) Acceptable Management Measures - measures applied alone or in combination to satisfy the intent of this subchapter are acceptable if there are no objectionable secondary consequences. Innovative techniques and ideas will be considered and may be used when shown to have the potential to produce successful results. Some alternatives are to: (i) avoid increases in surface runoff volume and velocity by including measures to promote infiltration to compensate for increased runoff from areas rendered impervious; (ii) avoid increases in stormwater discharge velocities by using vegetated or roughened swales and waterways in lieu of closed 1_ drains and high velocity paved sections; ,I (iii) provide energy dissipaters at outlets of storm drainage 1 facilities to reduce flow velocities at the point of discharge; is • these may range from simple rip rapped sections to complex • structures: w iv) protect watercourses subject to accelerated erosion by improving I cross sections and/or providing erosion-resistant lining. I i_a ' �' r.!-M,GL 11^'x' ('Lx^r � ;--••� Jur+ K*4 � •'� .r• L5-;' -_...,, r,..7-77- . ._, G .`✓al` .., r,,• jT f > �`� 1 33J • - i�[ Y Z y •-... l•1,rtJ”<��"'A - ' wit ,a� i . r - t -P.' -;274%-' ..eW r Y c, _ c si.. � s 4 ti 7 � - .- .. r,? ' SY S -3T 'T : �4� 0�3 . tx vyp.`1 1r-V.e;y , : ,.= ? -. .r,". .-�ju .r..Ri. �`-,r-•-. . rteQg.4!".4. jL. '� rs . i+^ M: . •Tei V:-.- . 7 -f, ,fir 4 _,f e , S� -... :7' _.. „ "„ 'c' . srf: . i•7'.`: , ' '1%a-3' n� "4 ':'✓ "-Wor c . :, ..lq.• .r.1 , , ,v:X-C-. ...g..," :. .. :. ._.., ...c.......... r• . � + T _• :.` ,......... -, ''.,'.', ' ;,..44-,;::::r-•:',1)K. 14.6 0::-,..i.i:. - . A-14 2) Exceptions - this rule shall not apply ,61 aAeas otke4 than the :.I 4 Univetsity Lake. Waterwhed where it can be demonstrated that , 7 . d stormwater discharge velocities will not create an . erosion problem in the receiving watercourse, -I 3) The following is a table of permissible velocity for stormwater .: - 1 discharges: - . : I 1 . , 1 I Maximum mum Permissible Material Velocities For F.P.S. M.P.5. . .. . 'l 4 Fine Sand (noncolloidal) 2.5 .8 a . ' 1 Sandy Loam (noncolloidal) 2.5 .8 Silt Loam (noncolloidal) 3.0 .9 . i .. i : 0.1irldiienlryav:lrm Loam 3.5 1.1 5.0 1.5 Stiff Clay (very colloidal) 5.0 1:5 Graded, Loam to Cobbles (noncolloidal) 5.0 1.5 1 , Graded, Silt to Cobbles (colloidal) 5.5 1.7 Alluvial Slits (noncolloidal) 3.5 1.1 Alluvial Silts (colloidal) 5.0 1.5 f .• 4 Coarse Gravel (noncolloidal) 6.0 1.8 • Cobbels and Shingles 5.5 1.7 Shale and Hard Pans 6.0 1.8 I ti . . . Source: Adopted from recommendations by Special Committee on Irrigation , • - , ..1 j Research, Americal Society of Civil Engineers, 1926, for channels with straight alignment. For sinuous channels multiply allowable 1 . velocity by 0.95 for slightly sinuous, by 0.9 for moderately sinuous channels, and by 0.8 for highly sinuous channels. Amended Effective (December 6, 1978 and April 8, 1980) _. .., Section 10 Borrow and Waste Areas I • ... .....,. ... When the person conducting the land-disturbing activity is also the person conducting the borrow and waste disposal activity, areas from which borrow is obtained and which are not regulated by the provisions of the Mining • . Act of 1971, and waste areas for surplus materials other than landfills , . regulated by the Department of Human Resources, Division of Health Services, shall be considered as part of the land-disturbing activity where the borrow material is being used or from which the waste material originated. When the person conducting the land-disturbing activity is not the person obtaining the borrow and/or disposing of the waste,these areas shall be . I considered a separate land-disturbing activity. - 1 Section 11 Access, and Haul Roads, -, • 2 Temporary access and haul roads, other than public roads, constructed or ' 4 used in connection with any land-disturbing activity shall be considered 1 a part of such activity. With kespect to deveCopmeat 4:11 the Univets.Zty - 1 • Lake Wate4shed, these access and haue /wads slate have avet pads ptaccd I ' at the ent:Lanee o6 the site c a eand-diztuithing actEvi-ty. i g I- 1 I 1 i . 1 . , • 3 • , . - ,•.., ' I '.'-ilifisfire - "--:::''' -,,•`-23'''';''s-:,42,2:,4-=',.: -..,-4. -eci,112...: -,'.,--.!!-::.-k-z..,-.4,-",.L.,:;,..;!'',v.,;-:-.7:7',,-. - •-%-: ' -;ic ....L,,, ,:!:,:t.t,,I. ,:;,-;_ . . .4.,„......:,,. r -'".rX,....4.-..,e444?k'. &.:-.;:'41:;;;...,f,s:.-7.,,,,,,,i.,',:t;Ti6":...u.;;.,-.74_,._-_,..„,."44"?4-F.:---1:-..;::,.4 iv":c k'Pt..r1 .......S.:".•rikiri.;=".:m.77'.r:2-':+r•f•b"1"?'-k•-r:.- '''s,;';-'5".X=""''''Z'''''''';'-';'''7'':::.1C' I -.-",'"'...";.17. 4*.7"''1,'+=•7,77'We '..S.rf'S'7-...,..,'-'elt*F-4511:73--;;; ;;;7574;42 ...., :,-;-27.:?,7...-9-,;.:-.",i'.. ';477,:,-7,-..,:1:4;;;lli.),;"4--""t..,,'4 117.,-",:a.,...,„":`;•:7:--7-.9P:.,:;• . . ''"";.a :4'.4-..."•-•.:- .A ''.-j4;".1 ,..-air.,..,.....---,,,,m7nLwo ..7.--1-7.:::,-,,:r_ r;,,,,--,...,74.4.4.. ....3-i.-- -„',i,-,44;..cT:-;;;A_474'f-,?ri•-■••-,417.14,4_1,-4,c.„. --"s-4R17g",•:;'- '.. I,, -;0-.41N.."..-., ,i,.. . _ z,„.... ,..._-_,.,..„.„4; :,•.,.':::ar:-_.&-,.....-1-0.4:A41.::,7at,.:4,41>:.,-,_;:t..,',1:;,i,",-5' ..'-wz,- ,P,''''-r...,...,--%kkf.b..64",tit, t4::: %:,,,_:..k.,..-... -F:r:itic;:.., :!_ :".12.-44'7.irgati -2"1.4r..",.- '''' "a"....7. '',..t.n.'.'• .. alf.e.a..;_kirs.li:A."-',C.t.'-4,...".Y-1.5-4::t.:71t- ft".:-.'"4,re,.-:-:i..., - 4'.;:;"'''''-': "'6A-11-72. ;'-`'-''''''''' '''''' .''' kl"...-{L.i4t.-*-4.4.L.:(-42e.. ....\';'17-.',. .•••:l''''''''.-.1 .,F.-k-:,,..,wiS''''4.-.. ....rjo...67.47d...,.4,.-1*".. . .. -:'.'"''''iC..;.••'',;'=.5':..:47.41.`Xtr,....1:;,-.0ri.e.'.`,a,,,74.74.--.1.,1=.,t ,A44::%-,1"1:1.;-;:.1.:.V4--F!,.,,; ‹,,:t,%"..-rti4...' ; 'r••••'4-.,,,-...74,*■:-"af''''.1:1,-'-'-' .'-•••.--E-IT,U1,-A'' ...4:;‘.'Li:t3,'6'• t2.1..4..",:',47••"rAlt.:%:Y;it•I-47:: 1•7,,, a•-4.•flttn.i.F1.- p,.,.,..."4 ,14,re. .s‘P.7. 1-..;•Z,,, ,., 7%*:MTZ.,,l''.fi.t a g•-'' '''''. -- --:**NI'. .4;" Zt..!-'7 ft . ...-...-. ,7t..qtr:r.f4:::,-'7,-'1,::'-•',.1...'-'-''....-:5. • ;Iir.i, ..?' '' ' *, r=...:17:*-TL`k-r4F',A...47-- 75.1,1"'"." 0,.i,,.....•-.• .A.:4`;'",:j..g.,M ..7 --.. .,1•.!bul ;.1.',.:4,.".',,i; , ,..-•,I.,..e_:"•... rill,.,..' •,..i. ', ■,..A.-. ._:., . 14, .-•... #N....31,et •- ,.,. .• -..^• ____,...... ,.47)v.w;;•1.-- ."-De"S'.. .,:firj4.70,Z.M.4...7:11..50,r.u., 4,T.:74,A"....5.,...r' 7-7.4t.....r.-.,.. gr,..e. - - ■ | 4 .�' - ~~=.~=�.�=.~_~ - | ' ---�---'--- .`` 1 - 7 . '. ----' - ^ ' �� � 1 � . � 8-?6 i x . � receipt of the revocation notice, the person responsible must immediately ' order all land-disturbing activities to cease, except those activities which , are specifically directed towards bringing the site back into a state of compliance. . :./ Once the site has been inspected and remedial work approved by the Erosion / . �� Control Division, the responsible party may re-apply '~ a grading permit. - ' �� . The fee for a re-application is set at 58 percent of for original permit 'e � _ except on projects where no original charge for the permit was made. On rhese projects where no fe h -�- ' those ' 50 percent of the rerate was charged, the re-application fee is set 't / ``� other than thon�=necessary�" r «� toc' Resumption pf land-disturbing activities - bring the site back into a state of compliance before reissuance of the grading permit will constitute a violation of the ' �� � ord1nance' The person responsible for the land-disturbing activity may appeal | � ' the revocation of a grading permit following the procedures set out in | ( �'.�. Section 21f of this ordinance. Amended Effective (December 6, 1978 and September 1, 1979) Section 18 Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plans | . ,� a, An erosion control plan shall be prepared when ' - °uc^^un^ 6 on. 6.1 n6 111.14 111.14 vodunn`ce The plan shall be filed ! with the Erosion Control Officer and^ e the Orange Soil and Water Conservation District; 30 days prior to the co ;�� the proposed activity. commencement of ' i b. The OraRge Soil and Water Conservation District, within 20 days of receipt ` of any plan, or within such additional time as may be prescribed by the ' Board of Commissioners of Orange County, shall review such plan and submit `� its comments and recommendations ,to the Erosion Control Officer. Failure ��� nf the District to submit its comments and recommendations to the E ��,-: Control Officer within the prescribed time will not delay final»e ro��»n � ,` on the plan, /a� �na| action \' / � ! �� �' The Erosion Control Officer will review each plan submitted and within 30 days of receipt thereof will notify the person submitting the plan that it has been approved, approved xith'mmdifioations, approved with ` ' performance reservations, or disapproved . '- '' d^ The plan required by this section shall contain such architectural and engineering drawings, maps, i calculatiAs, and narrative . ' statements as are needed to adequately describe the proposed development the tract and the measures planned to comply with the requirements of this co snrdinanc�' The plan shall comply with all applicable State and local . regulations for erosion and sediment control . Plan content may vary to � meet the needs of specific site requirements. Detailed guidelines for plan preparation may be obtained fromthe Soil Conservation 5ervi ' '` "Guide for Ernsion Cun�rol un �onstrurtfon Sites" or from the Ecess , Control Officer on request. ` r» `o» e^ Application for amendment of an erosion control plan in written and/or graphic form may be made at any time under the same conditions as approved d ` ! ""�' by the Erosion Control Officer, the land-disturbing activities as l ' not proceed except in accordance with the erosion control plan '1 originally approved. i ii1i �ended Efferti^' |Jecember 6, 1978> ���U . T ' f 1 l j V ai. C' A-16 ik •1 Section 12 Operations in Lakes or Other Natural Watercourses Land-disturbing activity in connection with construction in, on, over, or • under a lake'or natural watercourse shall be planned and conducted in such a manner as to minimize the extent and duration of disturbance of the stream channel. The relocation of-a stream, where relocation is an s essential part of the proposed activity, shall be planned and executed _ i + so as to minimize changes in the stream flow characteristics except when justification for significant alteration to flow characteristics is provided. ' i Every effort shall be made to maintain buffer zones consisting of existing ,' vegetation between the land-disturbing activity and the watercourse. Section 13 Res•onsibilit for Maintenance - ree person l eforgmaintainingnallttemporaryaanddpermanent erosionyandasedbimentation ' 4 measures for 1 for measures and facilities during the development of a site. The responsibility maintaining f facilities after p site is compl sedimentation all permanent erosion an etedshalltlie withrthem land rowner d except facilities and measures installed within road or street right-of-way or easements accepted for maintenance by a government agency. Amended Effective (December 6, 1978) f f - Section 13.1 O S.ite. EacLe.L.t-°-h The, Exoacon ContaoE Cb4icel may aLLow etoltn Qatea /iun°bri that a dischanged € in votume1 on at nLLtea in exeeaa ob those otlte'twL a awedebyZo rt.eltit dinance to be discharged ijtto drainage 5ac.i.UtLe�s o55 ahem e at de stop nt .1.4u the ed, 1 obb—eite. 5acittu.ea and the channeCe Zeading this °deaLg ue. Adequate and maijr led in accordance with the ata'tah d�a�b n and e.e.. Adequate' "' pnov•ie .°n mua.t be made bon the ehWzing ob t A to ueet to uae o44-ei-te drainage baciLLtLea expenses t the bon aet t ° q p ac.Wtiea showed be made and et �in5o'u�-p11 Jte.Pated to the pro aced obb-eite 5 a part o5 the deve2open.'e we*.onatd cedi.mentn,tt°n contnoL perm. •;el Section 14 Additional Measures i • Whenever the Erosion Control Officer it i significant sedimentation ' i occurring as a resutfland-dsturbngactivty,-dspiteapplcatonand maintenance of protection practices, the person conducting the land-disturbing L'. �• activity or the person responsible for maintenance will be required to take : : additional protective action. II Section 15 Existing Uncovered Areas ' 11 a. wh uncovered sultedsfromsland-on the disturbingeactivities nottexeluded undea which (i) res auch anea5 the outside the Uitivc�ts i ty Section 5 °r 5.1, and (ii) �5 g q eet, and (iii) are Lake Watetehed exceed 20,000 con.ti uoue e uaae 6 subject to damage continued erosion, bedprovidedewithsang off f round o cover or otherprotective measures, structures, or devices sufficient to restrain accelerated erosion and control off-site sedimentation. I a4`: Ii 1 ,„.=.,_ r ,. ..� rn �. - y,LMrC-•r.-.. `!'.f. 'w:T', _v.( ����_i L-«..-. cer...�.• ...!,....5.5, .q r} ,rte �t {;C;';. ..is.4 yv '."1. ..c�-as,:`7-.;:, ..:'^ylj4:?R K 'x C': c r `7'} 9`r ';•-i:�.•'..c,�`�`-'! �;/f,. r• cn r r.:ri,ir=. !-•s / ..-•�, .'„.. ."' 'fit , q:,.+`1 C!Tr :1....,:".",‘7.---F1:.:4-..e. .;.,-,..,,1---,...1..,,,7,-_:,..n." 7 trr� Wi }}":',�∎,TJ ' FR s-'. 2 F-I J.1 1 tt -4.7.;102A,-.1'.' 1ti *-2 , - �. .�. ''f�■-^ •f-FF��'hl�� �}���-1 ec;��ii;.�y�-te Lr.� .f�' yM fhtyi��,��b L.. •r.il�'�+. • ."�`+. � "i64-It°t •z .rt'�.. �.-42•.= ',�-a t• -cr r,,V 4',<ri. -.--- �� ._) io.+may. _ ].� 1+�.. s ,=-,�1: +r '�--r" g.e-. .a'�;, e.. � e .._`1. t- --!!-'4';•:--!:.13`.wry„ -, +.-yam. !'" • - . ' � y'--r ;" n .i,' t.l .3 b. . ` .w�'in: e Ji... r-- fic•.F�,14,r!`�.r.^�.�.': � q�, ?, a rt ''r i �.`....�1 ee. w AI'', t'• �� ' {Y r 4 h++i� '�'• r ,.tiy--. 'a'.•,.::'-;:•A. 4 Lti- L- y'. -r , .y.�,'r.„.1zhy .&:.:. .Y•:•r. . ,' I.>,"'ii' , ...-+}y ,l1:�°i' .. '. ,#t{;+,1.6:t,��✓:-=� 4�` `°'n`�r-,.,.� `}•mot,-i.7 _ I .ri M"'z,r'"t ..=w.-ti'`Y - '4 ,,".a'S:* •, i�:v. w.:+iTavy [ ',' -- C, t5.4.}, P",, "_F^o X `r i �.±i'v cL r.. .' ''S.'.. =.` 7.,1r4.,..,1..,,....,..-,p i<.+, .T!x.R c° _�u iw[-�n i"± ',.- 6. ,-' .. a :erTS,, L.C;? ' x°�"y^ `�°= . � :� ` -_--~- � � ' .~ ���� ' � .� -^- ^- -- • -- 1 � , -----------____-_ _ __ '^~~ � -_--____ _ - ' ,...Z.,===== . , : : A-17 ;i ` ' b. The Erosion Control Officer will serve upon the | tn comply. The notice will se t forth the measures needed to comply and n d • : � wfl''~~^~- the time within which such measures must be completed. In determining the measures requi ed and the time allowed for compliance, ; the authority serving notice shall take into consideration the economic feasibility, technology, and quantity of work required, and shall set | ' reasonable and attainable time limits for compliance. | !| c^ The Erosion Control v' ' cer reserves the right to require preparatxpn _ |' and approval of an erosion control p l an in any instance wherein extensive '`,/ ' ' cuntrol measurns are required. Amended Effective (December mber b, 1978 ) Section 16 Erosion Control Officer | This ordinance creates the position of Orange County nty Erouipn Control Officer h will be responsible for carrying out the provisions of this ordinance. . h Orange County Erosion Control Officer shall work with the planning boards ' ' The the elected governing buardsnfthe planning jurisdictions within Orange[uunty n administering •� i and enforcing this ordinance. / .`- wo Section 17 Permits ' . a. No person shall in the UniveAsity - '- Lake heil uncovering- oft (ii)�O8 any square feet or more in o�eas omnm� than the ' ' W»�«n^ Lake Wmtuns6al without first obtaining u permit °."._ from i the Erosion Control Officer, except that no permit shall be ired for ' shall be issued only after submission and approval of an erosion and sedimentation control plan, . ` ~~.,^~^ to Zand-di...stutbing activity in the UniverlAity Lake Wateuhed .~. ' ~o ^ activity meets the cnitetia set 6o4th in subsection 6.1(6), . A and no plan shall me X�e un�v | ^oot»«^ ^""^ °"~^ ^ 4O - '---" --- �Watenshed a permit is required, ' ' ] uncovered is less than ,u� square '� /�� shall be obtained. Erosion � but no plan is required, a plan exemption u ' ' �e� —pl- exemption form shall be implemented � control measures the plan � _ and maintained " life of the project. Permits and application' ^ throughout and owner or an authorized agent. The agent forms must be signed / �� must have a signed letter of authorization from the owner. ` d necessary to defray costs b. The county may establish such fees as cons id ere n of administering this ordinance. �. ,Whenever a person engaged in a land_disturbing activity is not complying ' �with the provisions of this ordinance, the grading permit, or the approved ' sedimentation and erosion control plan, the Erosion Control Officer may ' revoke the grading permit for the site in question. Hotice of Revocation '. shall be given by registered or certified mail to the person responsible for the land-disturbing activity. d Grading permits and plan exemption forms automatically expire if the land . ` Grading disturbing activity does not commence within six months of the date of ' issue of the permit. ` In the event service cannot be accomplished by registered or certified mail ,Carolina i it may be accomplished in any manner provided in rule 4(j) of the North Carn. . ' | i Rules of Civil Pr"�'Jtlrp, " & �. I' 7,..c....44„A*,.„„.. .e,,,.... :. : ,„:._ ,,.... 4.4447....,a1.24.f.v.,„.74,17.7z,,,:;,,,,y..,,..,,,,„.,71.4...,..,,,:, .....0&__,_,,F,i.:,. ...1.,,,..: 5‘,i;;,-,-;,;.: r -- « ^ , ,- i. ,_ ____' '_^ `� ���~=' '_` '�� ` - ` �_____ 127' _ __ - _ ___ , 'r- ' `` °��—' . �. - 1;1 A-A-l8 � / ~ i ` ` `7 � • Section 19 Appeals `' ~ \ a, The disapproval or of any proposed erosion control plan an • by the Erosion Control Officer shall entitle the person submitting | / the plan to a public hearing if such person submits written demand � � fnr a ha�ring w�thin 15 da�s after receipt of wr�tten notice of .. � disapproval ormn6iff�a�ion � � d�� � s�p ^ i | | " b. [U Hearings held pursuant to this section shall be conducted ! '' Orange County Planning Board within 30 days after receipt of written ) demand for such hearing submitting the plan when �| such plan is for land-disturbing activities occurring outside the � / corporate limits of the towns of Chapel Hill, Carrboro, Hillsborough, | �' and Mebane. .�� (2) The Orange County Planning Board shall make recommendations to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County within 30 days after the date | a of the hearing on such erosion control plan. ! , , �' �0 Th� 8oard n� Comm�sdoner� mf Orange Cou ��ll rend itm fi 1 | , . decision on Board.of control plan upon which a hearing is requested ^.' within 30 days-of receipt of the recommendations from the agency ��.,, } conducting the hearing. / F. � � c. (1) Hearings held pursuant to this section shall be conducted by a ! . | � �.�i designated of the appropriate town board xd�h�n 3O da�s a��er � . / for such hearing made by the person submitting ' receipt is for land-disturbing activities occurring within the corporate limits of the towns of Chapel Hill, Carrboro, i ' Hillsborough, �ndNebane. i � , , ; (2) The said designated agency shall make recommendations to the appro- ' L `' priate town board within 30 days after the date of the hearing on such . \ erosion control plan. '| .| � ;� �1 said appropriate'ate tuwn board w1ll rande� its finul de��ofnn on any erosion control hearing is requested within {e ^ ,.� 30 days of receipt of the recommendations from the said designated ' |! agency conducting the hearings. n re ` � / ' �� = � 6. oca i t�m u1 | or ' ; modification of a proposed erosion control plan following the public / : hearing, the person submitting ''of � '�' to appeal the local government's action to the North Carolina Department /. Development. The submitting | 15 following the disapproval . / . -- erosion control plan or modifi i of the plan the local governing appeal the / decision to the t of Natural Resources and Community Development pursuant to Title 15 of the North Carolina Administrative Code, , i Subchapter 4B, Section .0018(b) and (c). � ' . � | Amended Effective (April 8, 1980) i � / [ . / r ` ! --, I) ' „..„=,;,,,:,:::::.-,: mcgt.--:i131,51/4::::=,-**IFI-v,-Avit-NL--4:44. -;17•7-7 ,,,R.,511Wor?...,. e711-,_71,r,_--;44-wt,40.:":,‘'-A '' 1 , ,:,:..-:_:',',1•:•,.-?-.157:•-*.t '- —-- ' , , •• . ...,,,.. --., ,,,..,- ..7.,,,.W-47:-..,'::,-,.„,..,--,,:..,!.f..., 04.30, ..7.. :;".":.: .,— --. -,..„ ........_.. ......7---..--...............--...—...-- • 44.':1,.'1.':. .i." .7::' .„ -- 12 .....---..,...,--- e',. . .-• - is :-:2,,, . N.... ..V:■:::'• "-7.to:77 -,-'.:.-..-....:0•'4:,..:". . . .- ■ .. k 1 ' 4 ( 3 - I I Section 20* Compliance With Plan Requirements -i t , 4 Any person engaged in land-disturbing activities who fails to file a plan 1 -, in accordance with ordinance, or who conducts a land-disturbing activity — 4 d ith thi di h except in accordance with provisions of a plan shall be deemed in violation 1.1 of this ordinance. ■ Section 21 Inspections and Investigations .. 1 i4 1 a The Erosion Control Officer will periodically inspect the sites of i 4 land-disturbing activities for which permits have been issued to determine i whether the activities are being conducted in accordance with the plan and to determine whether the measures required in the plan are effective i in controlling erosion and sediment resulting from land-disturbingactivities. b. If, through inspection, it is determined that a person engaged in land i $ disturbing activities has failed to comply with the approved plan or i that the measures required in the plan are not controlling erosion and i sediment, a notice shall be served upon that person by registered or certified mail. The notice shall set forth the measures necessary , - to achieve compliance with the plan and to achieve effective erosion ! 1, , , . and sediment control and shall state the time within which such measures must be completed. If the person engaged in the land-disturbing activities fails to comply within the time specified, he shall be deemed in violation of this ordinance. 1 In the event service cannot be accomplished by registered or certified mail , , it may be accomplished in any manner provided in rule 4(j) of the North Carolina 1 1 Rules of Civil Procedure. 1 , - ; 1 C. The Erosion Control Officer shall have the power to conduct such investigations : I as he may reasonably deem necessary to carry out his duties as prescribed , I in this ordinance, and for this purpose to enter at reasonable times upon : 1 any property, public or private, for the purpose of investigating and inspecting the sites of land-disturbing activities. No person shall l' 1 ' I refuse entry or access to any authorized representative or agent of the county who requests entry for purposes of inspection, and who presents , , appropriate credentials, nor shall any person obstruct, hamper or interfere .• 1 with any such representative while in the process of carrying out his official duties. d. The Erosion Control Officer shall also have the power to require written 3 statements, or the filing of reports under oath, with respect to pertinent questions relating to land-disturbing activities. ' I r ! e. The Erosion Control Officer shall have the power to revoke grading permits , 2 issued by the Erosion Control Division as provided for under Section 17c of this ordinance. ; 3 1 f. Whenever any person is violating this ordinance or any rule or order adopted or issued pursuant to this ordinance, or any term; condition, il or provisions of an approved erosion control plan, the Erosion Control 1 Officer may, either before or after the institution of any other action or proceeding authorized by this ordinance, issue a stop work order for d ! the site on which the violation has occurred. Upon issuance of such an order, the posting of same on the site of the violation, all work % 1 , I 1 ! ' . ' 7.7e"twfmen+ifsccrst-i-,,Tme■•••ivs--7--e- --3,...„,.-,..,.r"..,,, Z,;-r2,4*..--1 ,- 5541;*,' 16- c,,,-.-7!•" .,•451,,a ; 7:4•,-,''.:A=:;V:::-'',4i"*.iF^. 1...1:,,'.-cr'41• '+,..y'4,-'. -'"'- ; .›....1'., ' -frg;lerlF;,..,r1;;;,gi4P-kaliS.'4.4.,--V5,5.7.?;F:W 1.Zi'zj;:,••%::;"/::ti4 7% , 1 -641,2?.1% .''t'.<1 .1.E747#4'47",P.15.C,42 i ''';.'4•Vi-C-''''''..:=:...■.,'"t'''rrt•r:C•41W-Z.ja;7-.:051%-.3*:•V&5::"F'.4,j:Zi. " :4■••:,N"; .;"':".*■117r,1,;0,Z.; . I :.i..."‘"ti:-.. ;#1-2/: ;•1";"',-.::.r. 4---- --,,- -„_:.-i-2.7...-4:; -cd--; "7,,A2.,.„:,',..z,-„...AL -ar.=.,E.t:i4e.N-z,;;;,,z,lt,... ):;!_..?4_,. 4,,,,,,;;.,.,,,4;.....;.s;-,F.c .,-:‘,:.:71,-,,,: 4 g - .i.'4.-,3sti.;.:, 7-f-ExRP-4-. ;:,--:,;sp,:-., i:stlz-,04.1--p,':;.'s:;:;=--vA.,- ci,-, - .-, . ''4- 'r'•--i.L—'^'%-,,is:.2.. .,;'- z.,:,::1":. � . , ' .. ^' ._- ___��� — 2_ 3� - - '-----____T _ '." �,',V.-1 -.,,t. - .. ) . � � 8-2� | | 1. � ' }. � � | on the site of the violation shall cease, except those activities � ` necessary to bring the site into compliance with this ordinance. �` ` ' Notice of the stop work order shall be in writing, directed to ^he person � � ' . responsible for the land-disturbing activity and shall state the` reasons � for the issuance of the order, and the conditions under which rk may be - ' i resumed. Notice shall be given by registered or certified mail . ^ '/ In the event service cannot be accomplished by registered or certified mail ` !` | it may be accomplished in any manner provided in "ule 4(j) of the North Carolina` Rules of Civil Procedure. ' ! ,^� The owner or contractor appeal a stop work order to the County Commissioners � � within a period of five days ' 'after the order is issued. Notice of appeal »ners < �� be given in writing to the Commissioners, with a copy ' the Erosion appea shall ' ; .' ! , Officer. The County Commissioners shall a hearing at � un»trol ' scheduled meeting at which the / / their next inspector shall ,e"perm��ted e *ppoanr and the Erosion Control Officer or ��� the appeal as expeditiously arnpsum»ir�re|evant evidence, and shall rule on ' � on an appeal, no further Pending the ruling by the Commissioners � ., shall take place in violation of a stop work order. [ . / A 5, 1978) i' � ction 22 eu � i � ! ' »m i | . (1) Any who violates of the provisions of this ordinance ' ��'[� ' / I r6 �nr rules or orders adopted or issued pursuant to this ordinance, or wh o , ' �1nitiates or continues a land-disturbing activity for which an erosion -*contrnl plan is required except accordance with the terms, conditions,and provisions of an approved plan, be subject to a civil penalty /»f not more than $100. No be assessed until the/ ` 1 alleged to be in violation has been notified of the violation. Each day.' of a continuing violation shall constitute a separate violation under Section 22(a)(1), �(Z) Th e governing body of the town or county shall // penalty to assessed under Section 22(a) and shall make : .written demand for r~ the : ' � i ' �' and shall set forth in detail a description of the violation for which i-.. | -�the penalty has been invoked. If payment is not received or equitable_ �ptt/ement reached within 30 after demand for is made,. the matter shall be referred to the town or county attorney for' institution of a civil action in the name of the town or county in the appropriate division of General Courts of Justice for recovery .' of the penalty. Any sums recovered shall be used to Corry out the purposes ! / '. and requirements of this o �` b. Criminal Penalties ' • Any person who knowingly willingly violates � ordinance or .".= "r other '~ cr adopted or issued pursuant to this ordinance, . i . or who knowi ly initiates or continues a land-disturbing ` � || ' activity for which an erosion control plan is required except in accordance . with the terms, conditions, and provisions of an approved plan shaccor ance | . guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment not to exceed shall be ' / - _ | or by a fine not to exceed �5,DUO, or by both, at the discretion 90 days |/ / / Amended Effectf''- ;�ecember 6, I978) of ~ ^ ' | / ' 1:. : I l' ' ' ~-- '' = ,`�� |' ^ � ---- | / _' _ � _�� —~��==��-~_--�,__-_~-.-- . .-~—^--__.-,. ,` __ ---------__.- --- 16 ' - ./.'�.:a/:57 ^_=~�~=__��:4 n k , A-21 ' i � .; | _ Section 23 ^ .; a. Whenever the governing body of the town or county has reasonable -; to believe that any person is violating or threaten to violate this ordinance or any rule or order adopted or issued pursuant to this / : ordinance, or any approved erosion/ control plan, it either before: action an or proceeding authorized by this ordinance, institute a civil action 111 �� in the name of the town or county for injunctive relief to restrain t�, violation or threatened violation. The action shall be brought in the 'supmrinr Court of Orange County. ii `'� | �' b. Upon determination by a court that an alleged violation is occurring I:, ��` or is threateneded, it shall enter such orders or judgments as are - � necessary to abate the violation or to prevent the threatened violation. � � | The institution of an action for injunctive relief under this section ,� | shall not relieve any party to such proceedings from any civil or criminal penalty prescribed for violations of this ordinance. ^ '/ Section 24 ��1��bMity : ' .- If any one or more sections or portions thereof of this ordinance are held / to be invalid or unenforceable, all other sections and portions thereof shall nevertheless continue in full force and effect � '1 ^ ! / Section 25 Effective Date ' \ .� • This ordinance will become effective upon the Orange County Board �� . . of Commissioners and the approval of the Carolina Sedimentation Control /] . Commission. — --'~^ / | � . , ' ,,| . . | � 1 | � / � ` ` [ | '. l ' { �/ L | . E . | i | ! , . . ` it ' | /, . |! � ' | ' | { 1 � ( | . � . i f ' | | � | ° . �~n �r'��~^��*~��+�� ���s����� - ' ' • ^ ORANGE COUNTY 1 � ^ ~ BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM mV. s-2I MEETING DATE o ,"' `: SUBJECT: Jordan WIter Quality and Classification ' . . -__ _ _ - _ __' DEPARTMENT: County Connissinners || ( PUBLIC HEARING: y[S 8 NO �__ . - ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: Commissioner wil7hoit • PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH - 732-81E1 HILLSBOROUGH - 732-9361 CHAPEL HILL - 967-9251 MEBANE - 227-8031 DURHAM - 688-7331 PURPOSE: To consider further recommendations to NRCD Secretary Grinmley's Jordan Lake �ni1�atfveo. NEED: The strategy being proposed by NRCD for improving water quality in the Jordan is focused primarily on nutrients, particularly phosphorus. Although nutrients are important determinants of water quality from the standpoint of recreational uses and aesthetics, they are not very significant from the standpoint of human health. It is important to recognize that water quality means different things to different . Everyone wants "good water quality," but there are at least fbtir different meanings associated with the use of this phrase. These a -: 1. AestFetic plant life due to oxygen deprivation; 2. Bacterial standards - safe for body contact; " (coagulation, sedimentation, filtration and disinfection) to meet the natiOnal drinking water standards. These standards list numeric valves for a very limited list of metals and synthetic organic chemicals. 4. High kuality water - not only meets current drinking water quality, but is """`' The . ^. lassification proposed for the Jordan by the NRCD staff is premature in that i implies that, once classified A-lI, it meets all expectations of a source of drinking water. A source meeting just the current drinking standard is not sufficient, especially when it has been documented that carcinogens not covered by the current drinking water standards are present in the Haw River which is the primary source of water flowing into the Jordan. A much more prudent approach would be to intensify efforts to clean-up the Jordan, b � �p classify it B, nutrient sensitive, until studies on significance of toxics -s in the Jordan are completed. In order oard's concern about the health implications of using water from the Jordan as source of drinking water, our previously adopted state- ment on the Jordan needs to be expanded to include more specific discussion on taxies and the deficiencies of the proposed A-Il classification. IMPACT: The future health of the citizens of the region. . | | � RECOMMENDATION(S): Convey th se concerns about the health implications of use of the Jordan as"nn k,n water supply to Secretary Grimsley. ' | � / 132 Additions to Strata. Pa'er Pro'osed b Don Willhoit - Urania Count Board of Commissioners STRATEGY FOR IMPROVING THE WATER QUALITY OF FALLS AND JORDAN RESERV©IRS September 22, 1983 PREAMBLE - CONCERN ABOUT TOXICS The Triangle J Council of Governments remains concerned about the serious and still unanswered - questions about long-term health effects of toxic trace elements and synthetics organic chemicals which may be present in Falls and Jordan Lakes. At the May meeting of the N. C. Environmental Management Commission, NRCD officials cited their lack of data on which to base conclusive statements on the presence or absence of these.substances in the two reservoirs. At the September EMC meeting, evidence was presented suggesting the widespread occurrence of chemical biocides in the surface waters of North Carolina. Our concern is especially acute for Jordan Lake, whose watershed drains some of the most industralized portions of North Carolina. Current research at UNC-Chapel Hill confirms the presence of many synthetic organic chemicals in the Haw River whose identities - and effects - are still undetermined. Triangle J is seriously concerned about the lack of data on substances which the State is not measuring because of insufficient technical and/or financial capability. We recognize that available data indicate that both reservoirs will probably satisfy existing standards for water supply sources; but these standards fail to address the plethora of chemical species in the watersheds whose long-term health effects are still unknown. Historical evidence suggests that present standards will become obsolete as analytical and epidemiological methods improve. All A-II waters are not of equal quality. The U. S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N. C. Environmental Management Commission have both acknowledged that Jordan Lake is of lesser quality than OWASA's Cane Creek site in Orange County even though both sources may satisfy existing A-II standards. Triangle J is concerned that such subtle, but important, differences will be neglected if Jordan Lake is reclassified A-II without thorough investigation. Given the inadequacies of the present classification system, the most prudent action would be to reclassify the Jordan B, nutrient sensitive. Reclassifica- tion to A-II should await completion of studies on the health implications of use of the Jordan as a drinking water supply. We are concerned that NRCD's strenuous and sincere efforts of recent months have over-emphasized the threat of nutrient enrichment at the expense of toxic trace elements and synthetic organic chemicals. Nevertheless, Triangle J pro- poses the following Strategy for improving the water quality of Falls and Jordan Resetfvoirs. Virtually all the recommended management practices for controlling nonpoint sources of sediment and nutrients will effectively reduce toxic runoff 1 | ' fran urban less direct effect on toxics. The Strategy is not yet a finished product. (Indeed,. protecting and improving the tao lakes will never be a finished The Strategyldoes attempt to outline the most important water quality problegm ) and their practical solutions for the Falls and Jordan watersheds. It repre- sents a policy and planning guide for local governgents, and suggests a minimum to use these !recommendations as a point of departure for modifying their own conditions ' preferences may well justify more stringent o The � recognizes the many unanswered technical issues successful - and credible - effort will depend. We urge the State of North Carolina to help resolve these at the earliest possible date. The Strategy represents the best efforts of many committed professionals and policy-makers, to make difficult decisions in a limited time frame - with less than perfect information. The Triangle J Council of Governments urges the State of North Carolina to join the cities and counties of the two watersheds in improving the water quality Of Falls and Jordan Lakot' Additions to gy pap Section 1, ftrst paragraph: insert after first sentence: "It can utsp be • mi6icumtuvumtu v6 toxic pxat{c6du poteuxiou." [ Section II, first paragraph, first line; insert after "major source of; "toxic "toxic��uo o�m"mm�, synthetic o«guu�� �hmn�c�{�..." Section �lJ��-l� last sentence, insert after "reduce the runoff": � . , s v*g"nic chem{eu24, aw6�`ont, and'phosphoms" ( "pollution"). i- ���� VII, the following itegs A and B to the beginning of the list: A. Thoroughly consequences of toxic trace e.ements and synthetic organic chemicals throughout the Falls and Jordan watersheds. B. Developing better methods for predicting the lakes' response to changes in phosphorus loading. (re-number the remaining items) . ----- 134 Additions to Strategy paper proposed by Don Wilihoit - Orange County Board of Commissioners STRATEGY;FOR IMPROVING THE WATER QUALITY OF FALLS AND JORDAN RESERVOIRS September 22, 1983 PREAMBLE - CONCERN ABOUT TOXICS The Triangle J Council of Governments remains concerned about the serious - and still unanswered - questions about long-term health effects of toxic trace elements and synthetic organic chemicals which may be present in Fails and Jordan Lakes. At the May meeting of the N.C. Environmental Management Commission, NRCD officials cited their lack of data on which to base conclusive statements on the presence or absence of these substances in the two reservoirs. At the September EMC meeting, evidence was presented suggesting the widespread occurrence of chemical biocides in the surface waters of North Carolina. Our concern is especially acute for Jordan Lake, whose watershed drains some of the most industralized portions of North Carolina. Current research at UNC-Chapel Hill confirms the presence of many synthetic organic chemicals in the Haw River whose identities - and effects - are still undetermined. Triangle J is seriously concernediabout the lack of data on substances which the State Ts not measuring because of insufficient technical and/or financial capability. We recognize that available data indicate that both reservoirs will probably satisfy existing standards for water supply sources; but these standards fall to address the plethora of chemical species in the watersheds whose long-term health effects are still unknown. . Historical evidence suggests that present standards will become obsolete as analytical and epidemiological methods improve. All A-II waters are not of equal quality. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Environmental Management Commission have both acknowledged that Jordan Lake is of lesser quality than OWASA's Cane Creek site in Orange County - even though both sources may satisfy existing A-11 standards. Triangle J is concerned that such subtle, but important, differences will be neglected if Jordan Lake is reclassified See G 44d 1i withou thorough inves igation. 4e are concfne�'that ---RD's s renuous and sincere efforts of recent bs i a months have over-emphasized the threat of nutrient enrichment at the expense of toxic trace elements and synthetic organic chemicals. Never- theless, Triangle J proposes the following Strategy for improving the water quality of Falls and Jordan Reservoirs. Virtually all the recommended managementi practices for controlling nonpoint sources of sediment and nutrients will effectively reduce toxic runoff from urban and agricultural land. Phosphorus removal at treatment plants has a less direct effect on toxics. The Strategy is not yet a finished product. (Indeed, protecting (Over) ` I S - t :' - - -,- • 13 ■ . . . ,.:- -..;.... . :,. . 0 . _ H J, . . and improving the two lakes will never be a finished effort.) The Strategy does attempt to outline the most important water quality problems and their practical solutions for the Falls and Jordan watersheds. It reprbsentS a policy and planning guide for local governments, and suggests a minimum level of land use control for urbanizing areas. Local jurisdictions are urged to use these recommendations as a point of departure for modifying their own policies and regulations. Local conditions or preferences may well justify more stringent measures. The Strategy r : i - I also recognizes the many unanswered technical issues on which a successful - and credihle - effort will depend. We urge the State of North Carolina to help resolve these at the earliest possible date. I . ,. The Strategy represents the best efforts of many committed professionals and policY-makers to make difficult decisions in a limited time frame - with less than perfect information, The Triangle J Council of Governments urges the State of North Carolina to Join the cities and counties of the two watersheds in improving the water quality of Falls and Jordan Lakes. • Additions to blue Strate. •a.er: Section I, first paragraph; insert after first sentence: 7,1-t can also ' I be a significant source of toxic pesticide pollution." Section II, first paragraph, first line; insert after "major source of: "toxic traceelements, synthetic organic chemicals..." ' f Section I I-C-1, last sentence, insert after "reduce the runoff": "of toxic trace elements, synthetic organic chemicals, sediment, and phosphorus" (delete "pollution"). Section VII, add the following items A and B to the beginning of the list: A. Thoroughly evaluating the presence and consequences of toxic trace elements and synthetic organic chemicals throughout the Falls and Jordan watersheds. B. Developing better methods for predicting the lakes' response to changes in phosphorus loading. . . (re-n ber the remaining items) rm --.----..• . 7....:.4F,S.".-7...•:,;:i.:,;.:• 2.,-,'N''■:,,-:" 4.!1-1`'`7', 1'';-gr5.%., -.:4:4;.• .:-.,..-4;.t-',..':-:;:;. ,.i,. . li'6, . i _ - f' .. , .„. .,... ..-c.- - .-- ... :.. .,- ',. ;....:' . ' ,..,...., -7,---- VI. . ...:.„--6-..._ : N't ..> . . . ...„..... t.,5-',. . • ‘ ..,, es s .„ ! ', . • . • .. 4 .-1\i . .. . .' . . . , . . .. 1 cs- ,... I . . r - 1 . .,-,0,..p . . • . .- . . ,.. .. .,„,.... • ..,. ,... •, ...• . ._ .,„ ....,..,...... ' •• , k 7 • I .... . . I ' \S . • ' ' .7 • ; ,:. _:..... ;-'---!'" .,:'.' • . , : / A ,.': ,, '-'.-m-77: '. ''... ;:'' , • . $ r.,..... . 1 - . . .. . ,.. . _,.....-.-- :'.. • 1 ... .. " . ..• -t 1_,,,,,,,........ ...----•'-1; ! 1 1 . , . . . .. (\J I \1 \ . , . . ...,.t: .. ' , . . .. . -....,....,.. . . '• . ....... . . . .,.,..,.-.,.,'''e'.'':'':.`" .:. '• "":: ',.......f.:,:»,:;'' 47." - , -, t . - ,- i ..,' • . . .. . " . • .. . . . .. ,... . . . ,. ,. .. , .. ' • i.• ' ^.."' . - . . : .. „ . .. . ' ' ' ;,,,:, ':. : - • ' • . . . , . . . . , . . .• ' . . . • ' . -.• i " .,. . ; . . . . ., - • • r--- ' ..........isi,......._11. ' ''.. .. ,,■ (..„.. i . ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 106 EAST MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGH. N. o. 27278 RICHARD cn"'TTpD,o� DEN LLOYD muuoc^m�x^LL NORMAN CVALKIR DON WILI.1101T October 5, 1983 Mr. Mike Mills Highway Maintenan e Engineer North Carolina Department of Transportation ' Old N. C. Hwy 86 Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 Dear Mr. Mills: �Tthr�ies�et i's f t t�n o inform you^that on October 3, 1983* the Oran gm County n~^ "°bf"' " of n�Cs oC hmfumn r1 ts nm s n Y n e unmn immusy moved to request that the North Carolina Department of Transportation talc: : Hl - ~°d ^t oD hway�^780 sB^us| s set oeted stm»e of disrepa7 and is contributing o hazardous driving conditions. Realizing that schedul1og 7y preclude immediate action on resurfacing, it is requested that,i the interim, immediate action be taken to make spot improvements of the rood. This condition of'the road was brought to the Board's attention through the attached petitions containing 578 signatures. Thank you for your time and attention. 3inne'ely ~Ychmrd E WhittedL Chair Orange County Commissioners Attachment: Petition