Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 08-22-1983 ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARINGS MONDAY, AUGUST_22, 1983 SUPERIOR COURTROOM ORANGE COUNTY COURTHOUSE HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA A. BOARD COMMENTS B. AUDIENCE COMMENTS 1. Matters on the printed agenda 2. Matters not on the printed agenda C. REPORT'- WATER TASK FORCE D. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1 . Request by Khye Weng Ng and his wife Guat Cheng for a rezoning from Agricultural Residential to Planned Development - Industrial and Class A Special Use Permit 2. Proposed Amendment to the Land Use Plan for 3.01 acres in Hillsborough Township 3. Rezoning Request - 7/2/83 James Rae Freeland 4, Proposed area plan for the Harmon Young Commercial Transition Activity Node HB-4 b I 1 1 v| \ augu o[� � MINUTES A�- � y August 22, 1983 KV - \\ ' �be nr�n�e coout� �oacd ot Commissioners met in a special joint public � � l \ hearing with the Orange County Planning Board on Monday, August 22, 1983, at 7"30 P.M. in the Superior Courtroom, Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina. Commissioners Present: Richard E. Whitted, Chair, Commissioners Ben Lloyd, Shirley E. Marshall, Norman Walker and Don Willhoit. Planning Board Members Present: oc. Logan Irvin, Chair, and Members George Allison, Carl Walters, Frank Pearson, Alice Gordon, Nancy Laszlo, David Shanklin, John Wilson, Tom Bacon and Sharlene gilkey, Chairman Whitted stated that in accordance with policy, the public hearing will be chaired by the Chairman of the Planning Department. D-1 Request by Ky.e-Keog'Rg-sand his wife Guat_-Cbapg for a Rezoning from Agricultural Residential to Planned Development Industrial and Class A Special Use Permit (see pages of this book), Marvin Collins, Director of the Planning oepactmeot stated that Dr. nbYe Weng Ng and wife have requested a Planned Development-I1 designation for property located at the southwest corner of the intersection of NC. 86 North and Coleman Loop Road. A 5.03 acre tract is proposed for a building to be used for the packaging and production of a sweet and sour sauce, The present zoning of the property is A-R Agriculture Residential, which permits agricultural uses and residential development of densities of one unit per acre. The property to the north is occupied by Major Business Forms, Incorporated, zoned z-1 Industrial. All other property in this area is zoned A-R, including a residential area. There are a few single family homes to the west and east. The planned development district proposal was established in the Zoning Ordinance to allow single tracts of land to be planned and developed on a unified basis. The approach to creating such districts requires rezoning of the property, the issuance of a special use permit, and the assurance that they will meet special criteria for planned development within the Zoning Ordinance. The three (3) criteria for the I-1 Industrial District is set forth in Section 4.2.2.1. in the Zoning Ordinance: (1) The site must be located within a Rural Industrial Activity Node. The Orange County adopted Land Use Plan designates the Coleman Loop Road and NC 86 North intersection as a Rural Industrial Activity Node; (2) The lot size for individual use must be appropriate to the method of water supply and sewage disposal. On the five acre tract the Orange County Health Department has approved the septic tank system, and a well is proposed; (3) There must be access directly to streets designated as arterial or collector by the Land Use Plan. NC 86 North has been designated as an arterial street in the Land Use Plan. In terms of the general standards with Special Use Permits, the application must be approved unless it can be shown that the use will not promote the general health, safety and welfare if location were proposed in accordance with the plan submitted; if it will not maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property; if it is not in accordance with the adopted land use plan. Mr. Collins noted, a number of Planned Development standards applicable to oc. Weng's situation: (1) concentration of complementary use must be encouraged; (2) the site must serve as an alternative to strip development; (3) the minimum lot area is at least two acres; (4) there is a footage requirement rno c,zo+ °° "+,"o+ mr ns' ~"a A"",",im°,=," 7a7 f°cr ig ","vid~a. 512 2 (5) the use as requested is for the manufacturing of sweet and sour sauce, and it is a reasonable use; (6) in terms of employment limitations, the maximum square footage allowed for the industrial building is approximately 15,775 square teet. The building, as shown on the site plan submitted by the applicant, shows 6300 square feet to be developed in two phases of 3,158 square feet each. Open space is required and the site plan shows 179,653 square feet. The applicant has provided 212,790 square feet, exceeding the Ordinance requirement. In terms of parking and loading, there must be one parking space for each employee: there will be four employees employed in each phase and four parking spaces are available as shown on the glao. One loading space is required, and also shown ou^the plou, In terms of adjacent land use relationships the applicant has proposed at least a fifty foot buffer around the clearing limit area of the property except where the entrance is closed off at NC 86. In terms of traffic generation, this will be a very low traffic volume generator, with only about four to eight trips a day. In response to Commissioner willbnit's concern for the septic tank system and its expansion capability, Mz, Collins stated that the system was comparable to one used to service a household with a maximum of four people. mc' Rick Cannity stated that the process used is an efficient no waste aystem, In response to Dr. Irvin's questions relating to sterilization and method of cooking the sauce, Mr. Cannity stated that there are no preservatives put into the sauce, but all the bottles will be sterilized and the sauce will be boiled on electric stoves. Mr. Cannity stated that at the present time the market area is only in North Carolina. However, with the Hillsborough water aervice, the company could obtain USDA approval and possibly be regionwide. D-2 Proposed Plan taz_3.0l-,Einc gb Township mc, Collins stated that the applicant has submitted a request that the 3.01 acres be rezoned from R-1 to R-4 medium intensity residential. The first recommended criteria of the maintenance plan is that the land be located in an area that is in the process of being changed from rural to urban, and public utility and service should be provided within a ten year period. In this case, one land use plan extension has already occurred on the west side of NC 86, and the property has been designated as a transition area. It has also been rezoned and is currently under development. The land must possess a slope of less than 15%. On this piece of property there are no radical problems which will prohibit deveIopmeot, The property is located outside of the one hundred year flood plain area as identified by the Corp of Engineers. The soil condition is considered good. Water and sewer have been extended to serve Wildwood Phases I and II, and can easily be extended to service the 3.01 tract; are no known federally acknowledged historical and cultural sites within the area that this development will impact, Access to NC 86, which has been designated as an aerial road, is available and is located within less than five minutes commuting distance from major commercial centers in ailIabocuogb, It is located away from areas that would have a detrimental impact on the existing agricultural use in the planning area. For these reasons, the request is consistent with the criteria established in the Orange County Land Use Plan for the Ten Year Transition Area. t: 3 Ms. Eleanor Russo noted that the proposal for four dwellings to an acre might set a precedent and create a highly dense area. She questioned what kind of strain this type of development would have on police protection, etc. Dr. Irvin stated that the facilities in question were adequate. Ms. Lee Ricketts questioned whether the four homes to an acre would cause a strain on the pressure of the water lines for adjoining areas such as Joppa Oaks? She noted the only fire protection from Joppa Oaks came from the Hillsborough Fire Department. Marvin Collins described the utilities already located in this area and stated that the effect of the additional water pressure will not be overwhelming. The Town of Hillsborough has agreed to accept all water and sewer lines in Phases I and II of Wildwood, and have indicated that this development can be served by them. Mr. Joe Perkins stated that residents of Joppa Oaks could not get water hydrants in the area because the fire department will not hook a hydrant to anything less than a six inch pipe; the pipes in place are two inches. Ms. Hilda Brody raised her concern for Hillsborough's extensive use of water resources, noting specifically Seven Mile Creek. Dr. Irvin noted that Cates Creek empties below Seven Mile Creek, so the chances of contamination of Seven Mile Creek to Cates Creek would be virtually nil. Ms. Nancy McCoy stated that she lives on the corner of Jasper and Lonnie Drives and she does not have enough pressure for her washing machine or to fill the bathtub. Chairman Whitted raised some question regarding the timetable for the 12 inch main mentioned in the Harmon Young Study and the area the main will serve. Mr. Collins stated that the property on the lower side of Southern Railroad will be developed for industrial purposes, and the lines will accomodate this area and Wildwood Phase II. Cununiooiunec Whitted was told by members of the Planning Staff that these lines could possibly serve Joppa Oaks ficot, With no decisions made, oz- Irvin concluded the hearing on this item. D-3 BezonizuJ-Ilazue.st 7/2 (see pages . of this book) Marvin Collins noted this request involved the same 3.01 acres on the east side of NC 86. The requested zoning classification would allow for residential development densities up to four units per acre. The proposed zoning classification is R-4, allowing four units to the acre, with a minimum lot size requirement per dwelling of I0,000 square feet. The intent of the R-4 district is to provide locations for low and medium intensity residential development. The Zoning Ordinance contains three criteria which must be met: Cl) The area is designated by the Adopted Land Use Plan as a transition area and can reasonably assume annexation by municipalities within the projected period; (2) The individual should be aware that the water and sewer lines available to the site with approval by the State and the Town of Hillsborough can be extended; (3) Entrance access must be by way of the street classified as arterial or collector. NC 86 has been identified as arterial. Police protection in this area is provided by the Orange County Sheriff's Department and is located in the Orange Fire District which is serviced through Hillsborough for fire protection. Mr. Collins stated in response to Ms. Pilkey's concern for buffers and the widening of NC 86, that NC 86 has an existing 100 ft. right-of-way. The plan ",a=m"+ImA =h"°~a 1-h~ h"f+~, "°+~"fli"" mc R . 514 4 Approximately eight children will be residing within the subdivision to be developed. Four of these children will attend Efland Cheeks School, and the four others will attend the middle school, junior high or high schools. No citizens commented and the hearing on this item was concluded. D-4 p,mposea Area Plan for the Hamm Yman.g Cnmmercin1_3ransitjon Activity Node BB-4 Mo, Susan Smith of the Planning Department stated that the Land Use Plan for Orange County adopted in 1981 by the Board of Commissioners included the land use plan for the Harmon Young area study. Under this Plan there was a concept of designated activity nodes which are centers for commercial and industrial devmlopmwot. These centers were of various shapes and sizes and primarily they were located at major intersections of the County, generally reflecting historical development patterns. At the time of the adoption of the Land Use Plan, it was understood that the plan would be updated and refined on a continuing basis to reflect changing needs or development priorities in the County. A number of area studies for the activity nodes were proposed for the County and included in the Planning Department's 1983-84 work program, and the Harmon Young Study was listed as a priority area study. Ms. Smith noted that due to increased development of this area, the Board of Commissioners (on January 4, 1983) , asked that the Planning Staff look at Harmon Young as a priority area study. The study area is approximately 3,000 acres in size and includes areas in a large portion of Hillsborough Township and also in Eno Township. In an effort to involve people in the development of the area plan, a number of community surveys were taken whereby every resident in the study area received a community survey form, and the results are available in the Planning oepurtmeot, Four public meetings were also held. Advisory Council meetings were held to get specific input from people who had worked with the development of the land use plan in the townships. The staff had done data analysis to (1) identify planning issues and concerns; (2) specify development of goals and objectives; and, (3) formulate alternative development plans. On the land use map, Ms. Smith pointed out five residential land use designations identified as urban area, the ten-year transition area, the twenty-year transition area, rural-residential area, and a rural-agricultural area as well as a commercial category plan designation focused on the 1-85, N.C. 86 interchange which is circular in area and is about one-half mile in diameter and excludes residences along old NC 10, The ono Division of Duke Forest is designated as a public interest area. Since the adoption of the Land Use Plan in 1981, there have been three amendments: (1) to extend the Commercial Transition Activity Node south to include the Piedmont Power Operations Center; (2) the extension of the ten-year transition area to include the Freeland rzact to the south of the Town of Hillsborough; and, (3) the current proposal to extend the transition area to include the 3.01 acres on the east side. The proposed Land Use Plan for this area excludes the area within the Town of Hillsborough's planning jurisdiction. The ten-year transition area is extended south of Oakdale Drive to include all of the southeast corner, reflecting the presence of the 1-40 proposed interchange. The ten-year transition area has been extended to the east of Old 86, to reflect some residential strip development that will occur along the road. Also designated ��� � ~�� 5 as ten-year transition area are existing developments of Joppa Oaks, Byrdsville and Colonial Hills, which will reflect existing development patterns. The undeveloped area north of 1-85 and south of US 70 also has been designated as a ten-year transition area. The twenty-year designation is retained for the northeastern corner. Primary concerns expressed by residents of the area regarding the proposal are: (1) that the plans adequately reflect what the residents expect in ten to twenty years, especially for growth generated by 1-40/ (3) need to limit industrial development of the area to low impact light industriaL users; and (3) concern for being surrounded by commercial or industrial use. Commissioner Whitted suggested that the County make a request to the Department of Transportation to study the speed limit on NC 86, requesting the limit be reduced to 45 ^ mph. He also noted that the Department of Transportation is looking at what is necessary to have roads in Joppa Oaks meet state standards for a school bus routing plan. Dr. Irvin noted on the plan map the Industrial District between NC 86 and the line dividing the County Planning District with the Hillsborough Planning District. He asked if this area could be extended to the end of the line, or at least close to the 15% slope which might form a natural buffer between the industrial area and the residential noe. Ms. Susan Smith stated the Staff was trying to avoid multi-jurisdictional designations as well as staying as far away from Cates Creek as possible. In response to Ms. Ricketts concern for excess water flow from the Piedmont area into Joppa Oaks, Ms. Smith noted that the water will be drained from the back-side of Piedmont Power back toward the front and away from Joppa Oaks. Ms. Smith stated that the new transition area is about 320 acres which includes the small portion south of the railroad tracks and noted on the map the area designated for the twenty-year transition. In response to questions raised by Mr. Joe Ferguson, Ms. Smith noted the zoning in this area is n-1, one unit to the acre until rezoned, and taxes will reflect the zoning designation. As development occurs there will be more involvement with issues such as public safety and recreation; the Planning staff would like to enter into negotiations for recreational facilities, and some are being required as a result of the Freeman tract development. At this point there are no plans for a public recreation area; the recreation areas that will be provided will be a part of tracts being developed. Dr. Irvin noted that the Board of Commissioners will give consideration to Joppa Oaks' need for recreation. He also stated that in Phase II of Wildwood some recreational area is being provided as one of the provisions of R-5 densities. Dr. Irvin complimented the Planning staff for an excellent job and declared the Joint Public Hearing of the Board of Commissioners and the Planning Board adjourned. Chairman Whitted noted that there were other items on the agenda, and requested a five minute break. Commissioner Norman Walker was not present after the break. A. Commissioner Willhoit added the Efland Sewer Extension for discussion. Chairman Whitted added the Landfill Reclamation Bids for consideration. B. AUDIENCE COMMENTS 1. NATTERS ON TUB parm?EL6GEN%A There were no comments. r WuTTFAr m"m nn TnF AnrmTnn xCnmnx ��� � _ _ 6 There were no comments. C. RneogT_lyeter Task Force Chairman Whitted noted that packages had been made available to the audience and any comments would be appreciated in an effort to prepare a statement for Secretary Grimaley. He noted the package included a statement presented to him at the Environmental Management Public Hearing, stating that the NRCD proposal to upgrade the Falls, Jordan and Meuse Lakes is supported by the Triangle J Council of Governments (COG) . This statement represents the position of the Water Resources Advisory Committee of the Council of the Governments, and was also approved by the Executive Committee. He noted that this is considered a water goal and not an endorsement of the present condition of the lakes. Support is also noted for the designation of both watersheds as nutrient sensitive. Another concern is emphasis on the drinking water quality rather than for the existing algae and nutrients. Chairman Whitted noted that it was asked that the Environmental Management Commission create a new enhanced protection designation to adequately address the existing problems, such as inorganic substances and traces of metal. The Chairman noted the second document, entitled 'Possible Falls/Jordan Management Strategy' is a working document used by the Water Resources Advisory Committee at its August 17, 1983 meeting. He noted two sections Urban Runoff -Existing Areas and Urban Runoff-New Development were areas where Orange could be most effective in both watersheds. He stated that proposed management strategies have been presented to the Water Resources Advisory Committee and COG, but none have been voted on by the Committee or COG. (See attachment.) Other areas of discussion were the Wastewater Treatment, Hazardous Material Spills, and Equity Sharing. He noted that as the Board of Commissioners look at the development of the two watersheds, there should be some consistency from one jurisdiction to the other, and this should be one of the concerns addressed in the community with Secretary Gcimsley. Commissioner Whitted also noted the proposed water quality goals of the Falls Watershed Management for nutrients, sedimentation and stormwater runoff and the pie charts which demonstrated the various watersheds and the inputs of surrounding counties. Commissioner Whitted noted that the City of Durham's response to Secretary Grimsely will primarily encourage a City and County Sedimentation and Erosion Control Ordinance. The City of Cary has endorsed the statement made by Commisssioner Whitted for the Triangle J Council of oovecoments, Commissioner Whitted noted that in the statement to Secretary Gcimoley, the County should emphasize the Sedimentation and Erosion Control Ordinance. He noted that the statement should also indicate the County's willingness to work with the Soil and Water Conservation District in an effort to develop the best management plans for agricultural use, indicating a need for more manpower in this etfoct, There should be a user fee applied for recreational and drinking water use, thus creating a pool to assist farmers in the local store for payment of management plans. He also noted a need to get some input from the NRCD Staff in an effort to determine how the County is going to reduce phosphorous. Commissioner Willhoit noted that because Orange County is less developed than other counties, there is a higher agricultural contribution, especially as this relates to Durham and Wake Counties. He noted that because Durham and Wake Counties utilize a larger portion of the watershed than Orange County, this should be a primary consideration as limitations are addressed. ��Y ~ ~ « 7 Commissioner wbitted noted that he would continue working with members of the Planning staff to develop a brief and concise statement to circulate before the Tuesday meeting. He noted that if there were any comments to be added, contact should be made with the Planning staff or himself. added It mnation Bid Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Marhsall to reject the landfill reclamation bids of August 10, 1983. (See page __ - of this book for a description of the bid.) VOTE: Ayes, 4; Noes, O. Added Item - Efland OewrrIiue Commissioner Willhoit proposed that the Board get back on schedule with the January proposal to adopt the amendments of the Land Use Plan, to extend zoning to Cheeks Township, to designate future reservoir sites in the area, and to develop a plan to finande water and sewer extensions. He proposed that the Board table further considerations of the agreement to extend the sewer lines to Efland School, and suggest to the School Board that they proceed with repairing immediate needs of the system until a long range plan can be adopted. He noted the need to get better data for determining ways to fund sewer and water lines for Efland Estates. If a good proposal is made showing that a lot of low-income people can be served, then perhaps a larger FHA project will enable the County to proceed by the first of the year. Commissioner Marshall noted that one of the newspapers had an interview with Wallace Harding, Finance Director, and it was indicated that the Board had taken action in appropriating monies to the schools and that the funding was in jeopardy. Commissioner Willhoit noted that the funds were to be held in contingency. Commissioner Whitted added that because of pending items in the General Assembly, $100,000 was put in capital reserve until the General Assembly action was boowo, He stated that the action is known now and all the funds did materialize. Ken Thompson, County Manager, noted that presently the tax rate for the Efland area is 31# based on $801,000 in value for forty-four lots and improvement. Commissioner Wbitted stated that the sewer line issue is being tabled until September 6, 1983 (as recommended by Commissioner Lloyd) , but there is a need to give the School Board some indication of the Board's willingness to provide the funds to repair the system. This is necessary not only to open the school, but so that the Environmental Management Commission will continue to give a discharge permit. He also noted that the Board should relay to the Town of Hillsborough that the cooperation shown in their effort to extend the sewer service to the Efland area is appreciated. Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, to appropriate $100,000 to each system (Orange County School System and Chapel Hill-Carrboro School System) , and make a decision on the s67,000 on September 6, 1983. VOTE: Ayes, 4; Noes, 0. Mr. John Forest, Chief of the Hillsborough Fire Department, addressed concerns made earlier during the public hearing, stating that fire protection for the Joppa Oaks area is adequate, and there is no problem with the water supply. He stated there are no hydrants in Joppa Oaks. With no further business for the Board to consider the meeting was adjourned by consensus. Richard E. Wbittea' Sharon Allison, Acting Clerk APPROVED 1/1T/84 ; - - INDEX AGENDA ITEM AGENDA ABSTRACT PAGE PAGE(S) 0-1 Rezoning Request from Agricultural 001 001-013 Residential to Planned Development- Industrial.and Class A Special Use Permit D-2 Proposed Amendment-to the Land Use Plan 014 014-019 0-3 Rezoning Request - James Rae Freeland 020 020-029 0-4 Proposed area plan for Harmon Young 030 030 Commercial Transition Activtty Node HB-4 ,,_ ! 1)4,' ) • 0 0 . '• LANNI NG BOARD ••• :■• 11 tzo ACTION AGENDA xrtil ABSTRACT EEL-M:3 marz August 22, 1983 Subject: Request by Khye Weng Ng and his wife Guat Cherig for a rezoning from Argicultural Rebidential (A-R.). to Planned Development - Industrial (PD-01) and Class A Speaal Use Permit ______ Depastrat: Planning -71 [ Public Hear ing: X yes no Attecl..ment(s) : Application; Iotiozi Contact: Susan Smith Narrative; Tax Map Itrine Nialz .s: 732-8181 Ext. 2144 ----- -t7R_ons-7-• - To receive citizen input and comments on the requested rezoning from esidential 1 qp4.-1) to Planned Development Indutrial 1. (PD-Ii) for 5.03 acres in Hillsborough Township. NEED: The applicantslhave requested a PD-I designation for property located at the south-west corner of the intersection of N.C. 86 S. land. S.R. 1332 (Coleman. Loop). An industrial building for the packaging and production of a sweet and sour sauce is planned by the applicants, The 5.03 acre tract is proposed to have access; alongN.C. 86. Traffic figures for N.C. 86 are 4500 trips/day . (1978). The Orange County Health Department has approved the lot for on site sewage disposal and a well is proposed. The site is wooded and the building is proposed toibe set back from the road. The area is located in the Orange Rural Fire District and will be served by the Orange Rescue Squad. DISACT: The property is located in the 11B-2 Rural-Industrial node as designated by the Land Use Plan and, therefore, would conform with the Land Use Plan if rezoned. The development intensity of the proposal meets the minimums required for open space and parking spaces and does not exceed the Maximum allowed Floor Area. . .. v ..--- ... 003 _„- _ ...- _,---- ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TrrmsBOROTTGH NORTH CAROLINA 27278 toeou 1,f rt, '• ft eg_ en 1. 1 4 6- , ,t4 dale,, TO: ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF DATE: AUGUST 8, 1983 RE: REZONING. REQUEST AND CLASS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Khye Weng Ng and wife Guat Chen§ Ng Route 3 Box 182 Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 Location: Southwest corner of the intersectionof N.C. Highway 86 and State Road 1332 (Coleman Loop) REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning and Class A Special Use Permit from A-R Residential to PD-II Planned Development Industrial 1 to build an induStrial building for the packaging and production of a sweet and sour sauce. Lot Size: 5.03 acres Existing Land Vacant wooded tract Use: Surrounding Land North - State Road 1332, and Major Business Forms which is Use and Zoning: zoned I-1 South - undeveloped land zoned A-R East - NC 86 and an A-R district on the east side of NC 86 West - A-R district with one residence Land Use Plan: The Land Use Plan designation for the tract is Agricultural-. . . , . . 004 Other applicable regulations are as follows; DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS A-R 1-1 Lot area/dwelling unit 40,000 sq. ft. 80,000 sq. ft. Lot width 150 ft. 200 ft. Front Yard 4o ft. 50 ft. Side/rear yards 20 ft. 50 ft. Building height 25 ft. 45 ft. SITE DEVELOPMENT - COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS To give some indication of the impact of development of the 5.03 acre tract, the different standards of the A-R and PD-I -1 zoning districts were applied to show the difference in the two districts as they apply to this situation. Traffic generation water consumption and sewage flow were then applied to ascertain the effect oF the project on NC-86. These calculations are shown on the accompanying table. APPLICATION CRITERIA The intent of the Light Industrial-I (1-1) District is to provide appropriately located and sized sites for limited industrial uses engaged in manufacturing, processing, creating and assembling of gods, merchandise or equipment. Performance standards will be used to insure the absence of adverse impacts beyond the immediate space occupied by the building. Section 4.2.21 of the Zoning Ordinance states that the district designation will be applied where the following conditions exist: 1. The site is located outside of the Chapel Hill Joint Planning Area and within an Industrial Transition Activity node or a Rural industrial Activity Node. 1 Staff Comment: The site IS located in a Rural Industrial node centered around the Intersection of NC 86 and State Road 1332 (Coleman Loop) . 2. Lot size for individual uses shall be appropriate to the method of water supply and sewage disposal . Staff Comment: A septic tank system has been approved by the Health Department for the 5.03 acre lot. It is proposed that an on-site well will serve the lot; however, there is alwater line approcimately 2100' from this property. The applicants have indicated they may extend this line to their project. 1 1 1 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS/DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS ZONING DISTRICT r A-R PDI-1 I. 5.03 5.03 .56 NIA rea (11 . 1%) N/A a Allowed N/A 15,774.48 sq. ft. proposed N/A 6,300 sq. ft. (Building) 40,000 sq. ft. 80,000 sq. ft. g-lln i ts------------------- ---4------_----------- ---NIA---- ------- - _.__--___-_. �.. .____- _-__.-__...__._.�. s/Acre) .89 N/A ad NIA 179,653.80 sq. ft. rd N/A 212,790 sq. ft. gelling(3) 8.87 N/A . 1 34.48 ADT 48 ADT auired N/A 8 posed N/A 8 /Dwelling (4) 400 gpd N/A =taw 1600 gpd 200 gpd Populatianf 5) 11 N/A 5 N/A 3 NIA 2 N/A t l :q u i red N/A N/A 1) Based on percentages taken from subdivisions of comparable lot size 2) Land area available after deduction of land required for recreational use by LUI-Land Use Intensity System 3) Maricopa County Trip Generation Study 4`1 John McAdams Company 5) 2.8 persons/household Q 80% of households with sch000l age children (% Distribution - 50%-Elementary; 17% Middle, Jr. High and Sr. High) CrT C� i- / | ` � ` � � � ,����` ���� . ' ;I. - '-r--'-- - '--------- --------- _ 3. consist of direct vehicular access to streets designated either arterial or collector by the Land Use Plan Access to rail service is desirable, but not required. Staff t:. N.C. H� 86 has been classified as an arterial in the Oran ~ . � ,�' Orange County Land Use Plan. Direct access to this facility is available from the ;property in question. Arcer/al thoroughfares that provide the best service (shortest travel i ) to and from important employment, shopping, educational and popullation centers. They are characterized by relatively high travel speeds with minimum interference to through traffic. Because df the importance of N.C. 86 as an arterial or "traffic omver'/° ciare must be taken to protect this function. In 1978, traffic o \umes along this route had reached 4,600 vehicles per day. Given the capacity of the route (9,500 vehicles per day) this means that an ekesss oapecity'of approximately 5000 vehicles per day remains . If both phases of this project are developed, an additional 48 trips per day would be added to N.C. 86. Rail service is not available at this site. 1 518 . . 007 . . APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION DATE_J:gly_l •; ., 1 . The Honorable Board of County Commissioners ., 1 Orange County, North Carolina • .t..-' . , COMMISSIONERS: The undersigned request that property located on Tax Map Number 3 Block number --- , Lot numberP/0 28 , Shown on the accompanying plat, Agicultural- ., :":".-,• . which is presently in an ;Residential 13i-strict be rezoned to , . P.D. - Industrial . for the following reasons: - i• - .• 00- -t is„ • -• , $ 1. :.• - . .. d"im . te. - - rural industri; activity node by the adopted land use plan. . 2. Access to the Property is proposed to be directly on the an arterial , 1 ,''..• • 3, The prpRo.sed 1. :e I. ° Iiii 0 0' lylth_the_permittpd USP tRIOP fnr the industrial- I Zonin- District •..-. • , ' — LI.The glanned development designation will provide protection for the existing adjacenU residential uses whi - Jlo in- t- • - - 8 •11- t of . the •rooert for an industrial use. ' - • . Signed: Address: l';-- ____Rt. Box 182 Hillehorou:11, N.C. 2 2 8 '.f.' , I I I 11 REZONING U,Q=- CS�CKLIST sY�orough N C 27278 ApK h a Wen N wife ADDRESS, Own,S N t �� J + �AR Total number of areas„ AC��rrent land use Woodl.ar Curxant zonin td Pasture Type of rezoning requested P - Industriatl__�Proposed.l.and use Food PrOCeasin V public Community,,,�___,�_..._. Tax maler_Block ��=,.,Number of lot, -P/0 28 =1�roposed Water Supply: Individual seP UZ tank X_ Individual X -r= Proposed Sewage Treatment: Pub?ic­-.;,� �Community ��97 Access onto state road ` NC 8 - Average dai?y*traf»ic ,count on the state read (1 ese ibe existing Poorly drained areas critical. areas: Flood prone areas HONE NONE i , Streams NONE other,sensitive areas NONE -Describe land uses in: General Area A ricultur 1 `.1� si ential Industrial Adjacent parcels of land Fire District Oran e Rural , r C) Cn • oo9-, • NOTICE OF APPEAL TO ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OR REQUEST SPECIAL USE PERMIT Notice is hereby giver the Board'of Adjustment and the Zoning Officer of an appeal from the ruling of the zoning Officer on the _ day of , 19 which ordered that or I request a Special Use Permit as provided for in Section 8/8/23 for Planned Develop I ments premise.s located on PLC . 86 , Hillsborough Township, near SR 1:31? - said premises being within the area of jursidiction of the Zonina; Ordinance.- for Oran County as applied to Chapel Hill and Eno Townships, adopted by the Orange County Board of Commissioners. Title for this property is in the name of Khye Weng Ng and . • - . The grounds for this appeal are as foUows: _ 1.; . Jul 1 Date •karlaidi' Signature • appellant Rt. 3 Boy 182 ail 1 Rhaugt.,_li..c_ 27; Address If title to above mentioned property is not in the name of the applicant and appeal 1 is on behalf of such property, attach a letter from the owner signifying his approval. Appeal must be acoompanied by a small scale vicinity map, showing exact location of ' ' • , The applicants have for the past several years produced a sweet and sour sauce which they have made and packaged out of makeshift facilities. They feel that the business is now strong enough to warrant expansion which in turn will require a different facility. It is proposed that 5.03 acres be rezoned to Planned Development-Indus- trial. They pan to build a metal building on a concrete slab. There will probably be four employees. Construction of.the building will start TATith- , , in one year ofithe issuance of the Special _Use Permit and be completed within six months. Phase II would probably be started within five to eight years after Phase I is completed. The existing vegetation should usually screen the building from N.C. b except for the area for the graveled parking. The sign for the project shall not exceed 32 square feet and shall meet the requirements of Article Nine. The parking area is proposed to be graveled along with the access drive. Sight distances in both directions from the driveway are good. The amount of land distributing activity at the site will be kept to a minimum, only the area for sewage drain lines, building, parking and de- livery will be cleared. All such activity will be done in accordance with Orange County regulations. The buildings (both phases) will be 701X 451', each phase would have 315P square feet for a total of 63g0 square feet of floor area. The Zoning Ordinance would allow up to a maximum of 15,770 square feet. The food pro- cessing activity will not create any significant amounts of wastes. Those wastes createdlwill be disposed of like restaurant wastes in the County land- fill. Relation to Major Transportation Facilities The site plan indicates the proposed access to this project will be directly from N.C. 66. This facility is designed as an arterial in the adop- ted Land Use Plan. In 1978 the average daily traffic count on N.C. &s6 was 4500 vehicles. ; In phase I, an additional 214 trips should be generated, in Phase II another 24 trips would probably be created. Most deliveries to and from the site will be by small trucks. Relation to Public Utilities, Facilities and Services It is proposed that an an site well will serve the lot. There is a water line approximately 2100' from this property, the applicants may extend the line to the project. There are no appreciable wastes from the food processing, all ingre- dients are natural and will, be disposed of in the landfill. The Orange County Health Depai-trnent has approved an area for on site sewage disposal. Both electrical and !rtelephone service to the building will be placed under ground as requested by the Zoning Ordinance. • - • q: •; • ' _ • . , Ph sical Character of the Site and Relation to Surroun. ' : Properties I ! This property is most1r wooded with a mixture of hardwood and pines, some of which is mature. The northern end of the property is relatively flat while the southern portion slopes toward the creek south of this property. It is proposed that as much of the site as possible will re- main, in its pfesent state. The Zoning Ordinance requires 50' setbacks from each of the property lines and as the site plan shows this require- ment is more than met. It is the applicants desire not to adversely pact the adjadent property and to build a project which will he an asset to the ?zrea. Rick Cannity ?a„,..2 012 Property Description Beginning; at a point at the intersection of the southern right of way of SR 1332 and the western right of way of N.C. 86 thence in a souther- ly direction S112* - 14' - 53 " E a distance of 766.81 to a point, thence in a southerly! direction S - 76 - 13' - 46" Wa distance of 2d7.32' to a point, thence in a northerly direction N 12. - 14' - 53" W a distance of 756.85' to a point in the right of way of SR 1332, thence in a northerly :lirection N 7L 38' - 42" E a distance of 2 .63' to the point and place of beg-inning. .1 Tract described contains a total of 5.03 acres. 1 3 • 01 : i.r✓ ",t r y ,W -; w'' �.-. f : • . ,..T , . ..„...,,tor..,...,,. ...:: ,....„,„„2:44.1.5.......00,4..... . .,, ,. , .7.: ,..... .. ...., .:,......,.._,,:e„,. ...frr.*:,•• , p% .4 t--, • 5:* , ,-...., , ''''''). :,trt.s.t. '_.' ,,,, `,..„ I,. ,.. , ix 71 TIM', rift.----1.'-- - 4 • 4 •: it i• • ^ 1 i•.( *+ . "i 1' �• I ., k ..ry4. •M3 , „4 .z , t• "a :i'-x M.� '. ,` Yrns-rFf'/Y t•,S.%:d is's 1,..',...,, ._"}'r�',•? j ""'++`.n....:ki.`'�c"��-"•s'wL`;,......_ i.,..,. ' •.;..C✓" ;��._.,`'i2,' .„t,,,, .r.-,:,.;,..,. .. M me :'ri.-; •:"*0;"�4••:."rt- y� .1 _ •^ ,y-:1"}-'rlr...'�f" �,`•,"e�_ � ;, % •' ,y � �. •fA4.: = � ` 'Y�'Z -"� 1- :t om M ...t; �5� i. -f y l-}. CU Y'�� .. i . ..f.i. ic if "4 � K; s?` b . T r . h 4 ' f!"Y'� r �< -; T� y I � rz: �V {i .1131- 1� �r�, ,.•- 31 � J9 .1.,;::;,,-.!,i,! C �� k � � .�xi ��> �-;? y.7• . _ ' a : ,, M iv, C? .:e.';'sr» Vi ); 1-j„ �:;; x •:y-'. ...,,4 + '•r `• •••!..14.,'-?.... . ..r..• _---- r ww.. a"-_.' _ , 1 I .' s :':` `..'.,..t "«4i.4.^ r•.: „.,'ter..•'":.1.±:,r 'r<• ASS?+..-• n'•++,'yrn°+74-"�• _ ^'s"!',-'`t..�y,••«• 4+sir ..:r .t.��'r.. .'.aT :.` r^.:�'„. c '"� •,l.,.'. •-,n y11•':f'•^-:^, ,, •�.r.. •:ti 4�a.'t'F'zf•-•••.:?,''..Py,,,� i l yip -4'1' ,. �;;+f' "at >•9•,,k,•4•!..4" �= ..,1�,,...v._.:r..'✓. i ".'£.• w -"K >k••,`y,, .. " 0 C..�`�:'d" ., :7F `"�:i"nC` .. ."*.�"Yf7;' .Yr1 c�1`:+:• ."'•'r. M .A. 1 • .": "..1,t.rii.;'rrr''""`2',r t "b _}.3r.!,,.. ,�•`:n ,�,,'„ 1,ii y ':.�.. ^:1V,7.4,1:: - -..151. f, .' �''�I,C...��rr��jay..;S'Sr,t7:'..': ......4..._ 'iy: ^.:-. !'°. f'iY.i'•.:""*.�k•� :�0,S' •^" I .ff'� g?%• '4a' . b js:lilt-.zr„.1:.. 'r.":,,,}r •5••.r•'':�:gx;j•. :,. ,„,.. �r!Lr�+tri.... -",.... •n:• •*::',11. �,t."::K'l: .. •Y lsa•+`F i �;y, .°r, ti '1t �'F«ii -i- '2. '#" - ',3k �;•r"y - �444.1.--.'i •ay�,tip• . „1. ,,, r:;.+ .� o-,c.,.., y .'r .1,40, '. !,.,' - Y .r *«;. 2. 4 j�, ......t.._...4.,..,.,..:ri.. '.r.r .,::%.!F, a:. ,,, '`-«-•••. �r'rfrj_ '.-1•;.•, •Zr ~t - -4r r.`;•}'`�✓ •x � •f'` r' .- '_ 5;. rp f ' 'jr *� a".s.,iv -ct:rzlw:-t-ss .-tiw'^'^':.'?w. 7'46 " 'f}..k.,�'yCC'Y•:w-;:tOr .:;..t.„.1:. ^_.•M '•4,.. ,^t°u"Ix•.. .. r 'Yr f....: y:' ri, 5 4 1.,F '� ..I: 4 .6 vze A^ tLlr 1.T.,,,•`- —, •t^ „, ..,,•,.•■ r 'si �r�' i;=: t :. i;tw.iy�r 3r b ; ` t r.••• *"=it,T: •�.`r.ur:_Si .:W; P i' �µ., �:. .•,,,+,rr. ,•••F ..':Yf; a. „,. xi,,,1-•, •.,. 4 a✓ :1,. '.4".`- ." w S"'r:=,. _ .#'�v ..� .w•'�'„f,y,,^S� ' ,,,-.'r� •wt ,.r J-. . .., ..,- .. :.x:..;.�.«.•,s,:-i==:.:f: ''.Y3';'tg3." "�--4,-,744,"........-« .--. r.--.. : °�•• I.•-,.:.;-'.4.-1,...'"' a;,,�^ k-�i":- '�";75�:-ree.}.'�.';r .`:•;a 41111111111111En . -... . .. . . . •-- .• ''.•!7,t.,;;-t.!.. .• .:. :,. ..,. ' .. • • .„ , , '. 1 ', , . 1.'i-4'..i.'.',;, • •..:; „,.• :„. '....;,, .. . .. ......._ .... ........ - - . ....v...., \\' ilia 0 1.271, .. ...• .......— _lap 0 1., 1 \\ T 166 --- - 25,3AC. i478 i \\ , 3 Ac -.....-- \...., \ i 3112 (12) 3 ACt , - t 3284 - EU \ \ C) 6993 • i C) 5794 \ \ 2.• 7-- 7.57 AC. -... 0 • • , 20 38 AC. - 1 k .0 62.03 AC i t 1• .. k ,.. / ....011P.. •‘ , ! ......._,..,....; ., \ CO '," .. 0,c. ....-L-------„,, : . ' .., ...- ..• . ‘1.1 1 -- Esaz C) , „....... .•" I 5..3 : • ,.....,,I 2.1 48_0 30tpc Ac AC, '-,.' ' ., - , . :756 wee . .- jii \ I 1 5........__. , , ' 46.8 BAC. '5359 \\............,,,,,..... I .• 't.-i 1 &g 9 g ..,.. / .-. .....,;„ ..- _...1.....--.74 43). 6$ '1 \ I ta ............_ - ., .. "%•-"• • • • • , , -:•• • • • ..:A.Orje.:4":;',-:;" [ANql BOARD - rtenr ::••4-" "7.24."' • :• • ;a1A•;;;t:. : "Ilktrit 41,4*?..,. 4:,yr :-,27gr.t1 'f."4 ln • ; • t•B3 crzaq, r=s51172 '-c-Y-% r127:.6-LING Eecim Aucrust • s•objec-t: Proposed Arrendmant to the land Use Plan for 3.01 acres in Hillsborough Township r . Public Rearing: .x yes Planning infomation Susan smith. 's' location'Map; Land Use Plan CategorylDescription " Phone: IN-tr.-ober: 132-8181 Ext.:. 349 _ To receive citizen input and comments on a proposed amendment to the Land Use Plan n r 3.01 acres from Rural Residential to Ten Year Transition. The applicant has requested that 3.01 acres located in Hillsborough Township and shown as a portion of Lot 4 on Tax Map 45 be redesignated as Ten Year Transition. The property is located on the east side of N.C. 86, south of the Southern Railway line and Joppa Oaks "subdivision. The tract is currently designated Rural Residential in the adopted Land Use Plan. ; The 3.01 acre tract is bounded ori the north by Joppa Oaks Subdivision end N.C. 86; on thei east by the properties of Meadie Arnold 'Primer and Joppa Oaks subdivision; on the south by Piedmont Electric Neabershi.p CorporatiOn; and on the west by 'N.C. 86 and Wildwood Phase II. • The applicant has also submitted a request that the 3.01 acres by rezoned from R-1 to R-.-4 medium intensity residential. The proposed amendirent to the Land Use Plan would allow for the proposed use of the property. IMPACT: The proposed change to the land Use Plan would extend the 10 Year Transition east of N.C. 86( to include the 3,01 acre tract. The proposal would not be incompatible with the existing developrrent 'in the area. The tract has frontage on N.C. 86- arterial along the 'western edge of the property and frontage on a 60' easement, -which intersects with N.C. 86 'at the northernmost , corner of the property, along the eastern property edge. Town of Hillsborough sewer and water services exist or are proposed in the proxi'mity of the property; water line to serve the ornneirtv Partld 11P elt-tpndpa frrtm T,-nn nnirc cri1-IA417-icirin I . i i : ' , . . • , • • • '• : , •'•:,,,J.,..„, _ i . • • ,. • - , . ,':..■:'. 'N'Aik4.14,:s.,'.; ; ; ':: ;:,:i■i)i,'2 ik,',Z;43,,:Lok 7:1 ,•,!',1...,.,,..''rli.'r,•,:',.i , • : ,,,.• 7 , 15‘. ": 1.1. 'e.', ""T•I',';'.'"'"".": 1 " It-",":',":y4i;P**J';•;-"."-e.,.' ..;;••;':r- '' 1.-- :" ,, ' . ! ,,e . `k tr, 1 _,......- ..•. ., ..,.—..- :•44. . - .,.•::--.7'="•—: - ! . . ..... .. . ..„ .. , ........ — „ * • .. ., e ; • "‘.. \ \ *-•.----,...„, . , t .. 4 e-• .,-;'. " • - . . I ,t, ..--.,„,,......_ ....„,„,..... . .. . 4....-",:„.`,.... . . • ip‘c 00106 ;-"`" ''''--; j•C. + • ' • , •.,,,, . , ''' ., • 11.17A4, '' \ \ 4.1.35 ,, . - • 1_ 1.37 AC- 10C e ti.:**'":''''''' . ZO 4". '''.••••.......... . ....... 0 ' . • , - -. "";• :."ft."'""*-.4....:,,,,.,,,;...:1 • , ...i. , .97AC- . 1 • - ;, rL4IL.FiOAD 03-- I t itii ' . , . • .A, .. _ t• ..3... , ... . 771114111111 . ' - ^ R-,,; . t ' 4 ,,.. . .., • ... .. •. 251,. ACCAL. ., .. ... . ; • • it.:,.... 70,1 ,. • # ' • , V; k r ' • ..- ...- i - • , , . -;;.1.; ... „. • : •:', -,- . - 1 .! - 1 ri ; 1/4 4•• 'II.1-i ,,,•'..$ 1„/", ,;•,..7';'" . . , 1 j1 V•"„•;;: _. / - .-:* *1;-. .''' ""'"'''•- •, s4 1/ ' _ , ","_it, ........--. _ . .1 / ,"•••.. _ '''',••.•-••-... ' - ..:„ , ''I • V ' '' " ' t"H'' " ": 1 1 •1, ,,,..-, „ .- ' - : . • 1„,1- ...--- ,4 7. '■" j ". ,1301 I: • '' ' 'I f .... - ..• --. -;-::::• 4-1' • . ' .4-..1* - ;:;. • ,..,. 1 c.,,,A, --7., , . :, ..; t ..., ....: : ir , ',.-- . 4C4A0 i *--' . sEit I MAP 45A 1 -a .• ,. I # ": _. • :-:'1, '• • L . : f '... r , • ,,,,% ....• . . ' • . 1. " . .a . • AVAP4 OAKS,„ „• ratxcmi creit;51i4 ftlf,• . w . • • ' '".SE C I) 4 44 i SECZ.2.7 -?•1 - .. . .. i *is- .. ;• $"A '' IA . II . :. . ,-. .-•%:#..... ..i. 1 . '-. - • . ,....„ . /1: ., • CI • ' •:• ' I*i *; i• ix r" I . 17,39- 7 AC- .„.- . . „:. . , ;,, ,, , //,L.. iii I • = 131 1 1 , - - •. . • -3 7,4 5.3413 16• Cil 1 1 1 • I I. t / J 7 AC '• „ I * . . 151 . . f... - 4... . ..1 i:: ” , : • * I - ' /-*••:"'Ar.--; '. . _. :1' :-.- - T ,:....F.-,. 4 • .841Z.. , . I • •-• -.t... ., ''''- - .! ;.• , : ... ,-.4'..,.. ,-......,,i90,..0 ••••••, . 1 . •, •.; .. . , . . . I* " I. . z',;, *• „- .. .•- 1 t z• .7....-. ..s,: - . • .—...-- •-.,... . ..- ;,:•.. „......---asprie. . ..,.... ................._,„," „-,,tr,.4 i .. . :.:: -..i4.- . • - - I- l''... ., .,. .,,. . ......• •.. -,.• .3 .. , b. 4130PPAa4sts, - „ 1 1 .:. - . .:. ; . . • 44. 'i ' . . . ., . 1 " ..• c ' 4 ' .. -. ...ow • • ., I i -45J • " " . • SEC.41 ' .. '' 1 ' ., •• . . , I I , .. . . • .,. F I I 'AlittLOWC•011 '•• . , - . . . 4/../ ' f::.'3i....... -. . • 7.:**,—;,• '.A6,„ .:.•..4'; .7 • I I .E.::: k!..f.:,11",..;: illf,-;;:.:'''' i•NAi• • c-;: .., r•gw; • , N. .. . . I,./ #- - - .. , # ----— — - 0 6464 .. , • - .. . ,., • • _ „. . I .. ... , c:,, , .,..•.....,,, :etz.7,. 1E:7,, ii.7.,:. ..,;;:.:kir v. .. . 8 . ..r..,Itz, ..,.,.......t.c.‘;;;;.„..;:;;;..... 7,,, i . i i ,....*,.v", .....,...;;;;t.,;-,OA-,• ' .,,",t,,•••'., "";p1i, id,:-..-'•44, :14. W.':".:A: ,■;., : :.'-',. ,.; !!..1, .....• 1,0...^:": ,Wfv—•:.:.,,S,r? •...,:,..-' Iti:. t.,.., •',„ jr,,... ,,*, .... 11.1.............■ ......* .......- i !;4: ..' ,,:: '-x-: ........... i I ..; • ,hr l I . • 1.1 I • ;,44, . • • •'914,:•1 , . • 016 EAST COAST LAND COMPANY, INC. POST OFFICE BOX 153 • H1LLISSOROLIOH. NORTH CAROLINA 2727 ft July 20, 1983 Orange County Planning Department Hillsborogn, NC 27278 Dear Sir:1 We request that the portion of tract #4 shown on Hillsborough township map #45 that is located east of NC 86 be changed from rural residential to 10 year tranition. Our request involves approximately 3 acres. Yours truly, EAST COAST ; COMPANY, INC. ames Rae Freeland • • .0., • , • • 0 1 , . Mayor Oh= Wilishating4 Town Clerk Agatha Johnson Lucius M.Cheshire Jr. HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27278 Sop, Water Works Commissioners C.E Rosemond Allen A,Lloyd mixt W.Paul Martin Street Supt. Remus J, Rachel FL Smith L.D.Wagoner Stevens OPC„. Lynwood J.Brown .z! o Chief of Police 4 Arnold W.Hamlett July 20, 1983 Orange County planning Department Orange County Courthouse Hillsborough, N. C. 27278 Dear Sir: 1 This is to state that water and sewer utilities are available to to the Wildwood property located on tap map 45, tract 4. Containing 3.01 acres on he East side of Highway 86 South. Should yoil. have further questions, please contact this office. Sincerely, . , liga— aJohnson Town Clerk PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE PLAN -COMPARISON- ie Freeland ,ough Township, portion of Lot 4 Tax Map 45. East of MC 86; South of 1 -85, Southern Railway Line and Joppa Oaks vision. 'es. ation from Rural Residential to Ten Year Transition RURAL RESIDENTIAL TEN YEAR TRANSITION Land in the -rural --areas of the County Land located in areas that are in the which is appropriate for low-.!ntens 1 ty.[dens i 0/ process of changing from rural to urban, residential development and which would that are suitable for urban-type densities not be dependent on urban services during and should be provided with public the plan period. utilities and services within the first 10-year phase of the Plan. Located on land with an overall slope of No signficant slope or opography p roblem less than 15% grade. that would unreasonably-irferease the-cost water and sewer—_14 nes,- - Located outside of 100-year flood prone Located outside of 100-year flood prone , prone areas as Identified by the Corps areas as identified by the Corps of of Engineers. Engineers. Located away from sites that would, If Located away from sites that would, if developed, create a threat to unique developed, create a threat to unique or or endangered species as identified endangered species as identified by the by the state or federal government. state or federal government. Located in areas where general soil Located In areas where general soil conditions are suitable for on-site conditions are suitable forurban uses: sewage disposal systems. because of.good drainage characteristics and load bearing capacity for site develop- ment. COD PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE PLAN --COMPARISON- (continued) RURAL RESIDENTIAL -TEN YEAR TRANSITION Located in areas that will not require Located in areas which are or urban-type services. could be reasonably and effl.ciently served by centralized public services- and utilities. r-om-a-re-as-whe re _-Located.-away—f rom_.a,r_eas__whe re-Aevel would have a detrimental impact on state meat would have a detrimental impact or federally acknowledged historic-cultural on state or federally acknowledged sites or County identified Public Interest historic-cultural sites or County Areas. identified Public Interest Areas. No evaluation. Located in areas that have very good; ."­, road access, as well as service by rail lines. These areas should have the most complete transportation network in the County's planning jurisdiction. Located in areas at least 5 minutes Located within less than a 5 minute commuting time from a activity- node, commuting time from.-small-scale commercial uses and a 5-10 minute commuting time from major commercial uses or an Urban area. Located In assoclati:on-,with othdr low- Located In areas which are in transi-. density rural residential uses in- general tion from. rural or low� -density uses- proximity to developed or developing to urban or higher density uses, activity nodes. Located awav from areas that would, if Located away from areaswhere develop- developed, have a detrimental impact on meet would have a detrimental -impact productive agricultural and managed on productive agricultural uses and forest land, managed forest land. Located In areasof rural pppu.Lation density , Located In areas with moderate to high -genera 1-3 Y. one' dwe I I i ng unit per acre. population densities. ...... ._____.. _ . „. •- ,:.:,,- P.c.clort, 1--,==.„.7,:' 7^'•.. 3 4,-,.....:-..„ .. ,,,,„.,.. -.,,,,,,,,,•,,,, ,..,?,.„ .,,...,;.,...„..„, :.,:„..-.,,,-,,, .10. 4,-;.N-- -.',.. .0,- ',,,--- ';.,-,%.-,,',... its...-5...r.,4;. 71Lif. . , - • - ,ttsV.4-,,.. 'Patl ; ,'ell..- -. z-... ..:,'1/4",‘-,.-' ,,. . ^•.'• ''; ...,,mra.zec... ACTIC41 PrGaITIN .V.Ck.,44 2"6-..-'' 2..... -- -,-,- August 22, 19831 1 • . , . . . , . , . stayject: Rezoning Request - Z-2-83 James Rae Freeland . , . 1 * r- - — .... • arm 1 ng I _ ----J.:3 pi.m...42245.rfarina..... • x yes jj... .natt....70=2.....n,..... ..._____...........,........... _.......... ,....,=!„........_..........— ......____ 1 . . . 1 . . , . 1 . . . . — - . , ....---1 -----r--- . . ---- ' , ta Report; inftnaluatIOLl Contact: susan Smith AttadiMe..'ett •., - . , Applicatjon; Map phone, IsTmlbaa= (919) 732-8181 EXT. 349 • , . . ........— • - . . 1 ; * To receive citizen input and comments on the requested rezoning for 3.01 acres from ResidentiA 1 (R-1) to Residential 4 (R-4) .:,, ... i . . I _ ,. • _.,a,i..... i 1EED: The property is located in Hillsborough Township and is shown as a portion of Lot 4 on Tax Map 45. it is located on the east side of N.C. Highway 86 south of Interstal . 85' nd the Southern Rail road. An R-4 zoning classification would allow the development of a subdivision with a minimum of 100000 sq. ft. single...family lots. Water and sewer service is being provided by Way. 61 cixinectianxto iiiv6f .".= Hillsborough 'stems. , Fire protection-would. be provided- to the site: by the _ Orange-Rural Fire District: Law enforcement service would be provided by the Orange County Sheriff's Department. ' . . • . . . r ..!.... . . . .- . ,-- . : . . . - -,. if the proposediamendment to the Land Use Plan to Ten Year Transition is IMPACT: approved the R-4 rezoning requestsbculd be appropriate.. The request oompliei . with the application criteria for R-4 zoning district designation. Potential impacts to be mitigated include traffic and access onto N.C. 86 south. , - . . f _ S,;', .i 52C �.i>C 1 021 !� � .92` �. 10 .. 2039 (f I etowzr 1' r .6 _�Y• AC. �, 1 - '..... . ,. .4 ... ... A tJ TA , 1 i08 . ,.r„y _, M� r � ~0 I, .tr....� 1.37 AG. r SA ;Y.. .. t r yj'-A! Ra'MAC. '2 1.97AC•, �-.. AC` e _ 1.44,7 �.."......./0,, .. / 1 2,51 AC.CAL, • .r. R ...,, ~ . ,,„ 0.14.'1 ..,..„.t,‘ cp A-C. I i ' ' t { 1 • o 4C4 .w. 1 " ! ti I MAP 454 1 I 1 0 1 II I l (tea OAKS, I 1 (JOPA9 O8K$l,,, (.KJPR7 OAKS,SECS! BA )AC f/ SEC)) 1?1 sFC:xi ' 1 ID Ii" I 139.37 AC. I \ // I"i I I I r I •;a l Fes+ 1W I I /'%' 1.t7AC 1 ( 1 1 t I t�iO . . / 1 ! • l s`* W. .64,x. 1 I 1�( 1 1 1 _E- ;,:- t-'•. .i,,0.;• 1 3 9, • ' /„�'; y ... 7 .- 1 ' 1 1 1 1 t 4 d is <. k m ,�.,.,. w. I I l a " ( darns 41 I I __ 2- ""° f �s SEC.31 SEE ( MAP 45= - xou " -xC:s SEE MAP W W � 1 I 1 1 r� 1 1,,,,,,„0„,,s, 1 I 1s , 1 SEC,.at I 1 1.98 AC • AC. WwCQn / . i►':� 1 1 1/ , . , IRE .,.,:.,01. .. ( N4 . II , \ k,_ ___„,„, z®:? / -.c^ saga 2.5 AC ` RIIq e • • / i are 3,92 c �� -. .,....,.. --- .-- --- / 0 24 /• 3092 //f Cr 22.771, 1 t 7560. ri 23 J i 62AC 4.87 AC. j 57F32 `1, ! I 4 9.78 AC. 1 1f . __ ___._. ._4444 .___ _ ■; . . - 521 . , 022 . ,• . " . .:...1; ORANGE COUNTY PLANNLNG DEPARTMENT HILLSBOROUGH NORTH CAROLINA . . 27278 :: I .!*.filii; %,,, . • - ;di , 4- ...- . , TO: ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD FRCO: PLANNING DEPAREvENT STAFF DATE: August 8, 1983 RE: Z-2-83 JAMES RAY FREELAND (REZONING REQUEST) ,•.:,•,,.:., GENERAL INFORMATION ,.., Applicant: James Ray Freeland P.O. Box 113 , -..- Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 Location: East side of N.C. Highway 86 south of Interstate 85 and the Southern Railroad :.:. ,• Requested Action: Rezone from R-1 Residential to R-4 Residential Purpose: To enable residential development on 10,000 "..;.. sq. ft. lots in order to provide less expensive single-family homes. „,.-- Lot Size: 3.01 acres or ,131,115.6 sq. ft. Existing Land Use: Vacant, wooded tract. Surrounding Land Use North - NC-86 an an R-5 undeveloped district and Zoning: on the north-west side of NC-86 c. -. South - PD-OI district where Piedmont Power is proposidg, an office-operations center East - R-2 district in Joppa Oaks Subdivision 1 --, West - NC--86 . ... Land Use Plan: The Land Use Plan would have to be amended to change the designation of the subject property from Rural Residential to 10 Year Transition. The requested R-4 residential district is one . , of seven (7) residential zoning districts identified • in the Land Use Plan as being compatible with the ,. 10-Year Transition Area designation. ..„ :,,• .:........--, I...,. 1 _ 522 . . . , 02a , . Applicable Regulations: Listed below is a comparison of uses permitted in the R-1 and R-4 Residential districts. "*" indicates , a use permitted by right. "e indicates a specific use permit is required from the Planning Board/Board of Commissioners. "B" indicates a special use permit is required from the Board of Adjustment. "0" indicates the use is not permitted. • COMPARISON OF PERMITTED USES * - Use by right A - Class A Special Use 0 - Not permitted B - Class B Special Use ?ElliirAh0 USES R-1 R-4 . Day nursery, day care, private kindergarden B B Dwelling; single-family * * Dwelling; two-family * * i , Dwelling; multiple-family 0 * Dwelling; mobile home * * Family care home Group care facility B B Residential hotel. (Fraternities, etc.) 0 0 :-. . Rooming house 0 Temporary mobile home B B Tourist home 0 * Accessory uses * . Airport, general aviation A 0 Botanical gardens * * Buildings, portable B B Bus passenger shelter * * !::f Cemetery B B Church * * Community center B B • :7-:' Extraction of earth products A A Governmental - protective services * * Landfill (2 acres or more) A 0 Landfill (Less than 2 acres) B 0 Parks, public and non-profit * * Public utility stations/substations A A Radio/TV towers NB B t • Schools * * Transmission lines B B Universities * 0 • Governmental facilities * * -. Water/Sewer pump stations * * Social Clubs or lodges * 0 Greenhouses (No on-premise sales) * 0 Kennels/Riding stables B 0 Recreational facilities (non-profit) B B Golf club/country club * m • •. *t• , 52 • -.•; ' : • 024 • ;;; Other applicable regulations are as follows: . 1 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS R-1 R-4 Lot area/dwelling unit 40,000 sq. ft. 10,000 sq. ft. Lot width 130 ft. 75 ft.. Front yard 40 ft. 25 ft. • Side/rear yards 20 ft. 10 ft. Building height 25 ft. 25 ft. SAE DEVELOPMENT - COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS To give some indication of the impact of development of the 3_01 acre tract, the ! density standards of the R-1 and R-4 zoning districts were applied to determine the inum number of housing units which could be placed on the site Etnd-Ards for estimating traffic generation, water consumption, sewage flow and school student population were then applied to ascertain the effect of the project on :In • thoroughfares, public utility systems and schools. These calculations are shown on the accompanying table and discussed in the "Application Criteria" section. APPLICATION CRITERIA The RA zoning district is one of three (3) districts designated as "low and medium .• intensity residential districts". The purpose of such districts is to provide locations for low and medium intensity residential development and supporting recreational, community, service and educational uses in areas where the full range of urban services are available or are to be provided as part of the development process. Section 4.2.3 of the Zoning Ordinance states that the district designation will be applied where the following conditions exist: 1. Designated by the adopted Land Use Plan as a Transition Area which can reasonably be expected to be annexed by a municipality in the ensuing 10-20 years. Staff Comment: As indicated previously, the Ind Use Plan must be amended to change the designation of the subject property to 10- Year Transition. Given the pattern of existing development with- in the area, it is reasonable to assume that annexation of the .•..-.• property by the Town of Hillsborough wouldoccur within 10-20 years. 2. Water and sewer lines should exist at site or be assured of installation • as part of the development process. Staff Comment: Water and sewer lines are being extended to serve this general area as part of the development of Wildwood Subdivision. Immediate water service caabe provided by way of the extension of a 6-inch main from Joppa Oaks subdivision. Sewer service is being extended along the west side of N.C. 86 to serve Wildwood subdivision. To serve this tract a sewer line would have to be extended under N.C.-86. 11111 Sri COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS/DEVED)PPM -IMPACT'S -- -FFWLAND TRACT CHARACIERISTIC R -1 R -4 Land area Street B/W Area 3.01 acres .33 acres 3.01 acresu .56 acres Net Development Area (11;1 %) 2.58 acres (22:0 %) 2.35 acres Lot Area/Dwelling 40,000 sq. ft. 10,000 sq. ft. 10 „. 7.'. Allowable Dwelling Units 2 X1.26 Density (Dwellings /Acre) (3) Estimated Trips/twelling .75 8.87 9.72 , Traffic Generation Water/Sewage plow/Dwelling (4) 18 Or 400 gpd 98 AD s 400 gpd Net Water /Sewage Flow Project Student Population (5) 800 gpd 4 110o0gpd 22 € Elementary 2 11 Middle 1 Jr. High I Sr. High Recreation Area Required N/A Nj3 Source Notes: (1) Based on percentages taken from subdivisions of caTparable lot size. (2) Land area available after deduction of land required for recreational use by LUI -Land Use Intensity System (3) Maricopa County 'Trip Generation Study (4) John McAdams CcaTpany (5) 2.8 persons/household = 80% of hoe High ehol h school )children (% Distribution - 50% �ementasy; RL� G� CF' .. : . . . _ . . 026 . — 3. Vehicular access must consist of direct access to a road certified as either an arterial or collector as designated by the adopted Land Use Plan. -rr Staff Couuent: N.C. Highway 86 has been classified as an arterial in the Orange County Land Use Plan. Direct access . _ to this facility is available from the property in question. Arterials are thoroughfares that provide the best service (shortest travel tiues) to and from important employment, shopping, edlacational and population centers. They are characterized by relatively high travel speeds with minimum interference to through traffic. Because of the -.Importance of N.C. 86 an arterial or "traffic mover", care nust be taken to protect this function. In 1981, traffic volumes along this route had reached 4,500 vehicles -il per day. Given the capacity of the route (9,500 vehicles per day) this means that an excess capacity of approximately 5,000 vehicles per day remains. If this project is developed at an I34 density, an additional 98 trips per day would be added to N.C. 86 based on an average trip generation rate of 9.72 trips per day for medium density single family dwellings. Completion of Wildwood Phases I and. II will add an additional 1,789 trips per day to N.C. 86. The total additional trips per day generated by Wildwood Phases I and II and the proposal . ',. rezoning would be 1,887 trips. ._, . ,i----: l''--: • !,-.. . ;., . , . .. , . . . . . .: . .:. d ::- 1 , .,,_ .... . . i REZONING I2E IT�ST' �C�sIST ADDRESS '`#i`�isaro I1 01 MiRf S NAME ` 3'D/ ? Current land us Current zonin Total number of acres. Proposed land usee'S'r�� Type of rezoning Yequested :, Public Community __ ___.�.. 5! 81ock Number of lots toposed Mater Supply: !'aX map {� Public ?' Conununity_� Individual. septic tank Individual Proposed Sewage Treatment �.___.... Describe existing , Access onto state road N� �� Overage daily tra= lc_count or. the state road ^_ ,._ Poorly-drained areas critical areas'. Tlood prone areas Streams b Other, sensitive areas°" 2 Describe land uses in-* General Area G1 i _ : �bY.tY1YYtE�/C i0�� Adjacent parcels of land t'S�K'?T"� .1 ii Fire District r - C) j C�1 s r . �''� •' ' j x:7`1 i •.. ,. , _., -,, --...,,,,,r, ,. 026 I . ; .. . .. .. . . ,,. , d , , APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION . ,. i 1 . DATE The Honorable Board of County Commissioners ,. 11 Orange County, North Carolina . COMMISSIONERS: The undersigned request that property located on/‘Tax Map\..Mumber Li- Block number , Lot number 1 , Shown on the accompanying plat, . ...., which is presently in a District be rezoned to 'r.;'.. . 'P., —1-4- -: , •" for the following reasons: . , - .... s t. . No.N. ,,,.. . 41/4 ..'s,' )",-.%‘ °' . – __ , •'' -... i I 4 -'1'.\\ '' ..–S° Slc"-- ..1 ,''''r.:1',..kk.r\-411,,, A-1:,. 10......;--MLAA .. . . .....4..:3 , 1 . )\• .,.n0 I . . - a i.-'. .3 . ■ i . "-.." 1"' l'--. , ( –• — ....a. 80. ...– _ IL.■ is. —,.......A.– di • -- 1 . ---.- . . • . . . ...*,., . . _ . ------- . 1.- Signed: Address: , , .„- • ' c,_,.— ,_,%,_0:-.-- • 1.12..ILL..i. "Da. % . . . . - .. — . . .. . . :14 .., 1 III = ' - 02u A certain tract of land in Hillsborough township, Orange County, NC further described as: BEGINNING at the intersection of the eastern right-of-way of NC 86 and the western right-of- way of Lonnie Drive; thence with the western right-of-way of Lonnie Drive S 10-33-56 E 610,37' to a point in the northern line of property of Piedmont Electric Membership Corporation; thence with the northern line of PEMC S 89-06-28 W 436.42' to a point in the eastern right-of-way of NC 86; . • thence with the eastern right-of-way of NC 86 N 28-07-55 E 688.11' to the point and place of beginning; containing 3.01 acres. ;2 - • • ; 11 0 3 c • - - • : ' • ' ' BOARD CISSIONZ.R. Action. - Item NO. r ACTIC-N AGED? IT,t24 AP_srfac_. r.n3.-Erv; ma-13 August 22, 1983 1 SubjeCt: Proposed Area Plan for the Harmon Young Commercial Transition Activity Node HB-4 PuE—f—zaic Hearing,: .x yes nt: Planning 1 - • • - itleOnTat..1.0t1 COntact: Susan Smith Attaerial.4.-Mt(S) 1328181 Ext. 349 - ' • - PUERPOSE: To consider-the: proposed Harmon Young Area Plan for the area in Hillsborough Township associirted with the Commercial Transition Activity Node (Harman Young - KB-4) desinated. in the adopted Land Use Plan for Orange County. On November 24 1983, a public hearing was held concerning a proposed Land Use Plan amendment to extend the HB-4 activity node down N.C. Highway 86 to allow PiedmontlPower Company to construct an office building and maintenance/ warehouse facility. A request for rezoning of the propOerty and approval of a Special Use Permit was also considered at that time. I On January 4, 1983-, the Board of Commissioners approved the Land Use Plan amendment, the rezoning request and the Special Use Permit for Piedmont Power. The Commissioners also directed the Planning Department to review and revise the plan for the HB-4 Harmon Young activity node within six (6) months, since the Piedmont Powerlrequest indicated increased pressure for development in and around the ilb-h Acrivity Node. Subsequently, a public hearing was held on January 24, 1983 to consider an amendment to the Land Use 'Plan requested by James Ray Freeland. The proposal was centered on the HB-4 activity node and involved changing designated 20- Year Transition and Rural Residential areas to 10- Year Transition. The request, as well as xeonings of + 10 acres to R-4 approved on March 7, 1983 and 35.11acres to R-5 approved on August 1 , 1983, were further indications of increased development pressure in the vicinity of the HB-4 activity node. Since the Commissioners! directive of January 4, 1983, the Planning Department has reviewed soils, topographic, land use, utility, flood plain and transportation information toidentify important planning'issues within the HB-4 activity node. Three meetings were held with the Hillsborough Township Advisory Council, two of which were held jointly with the Eno Township Advisory Council, to review planning issues for the area and to review proposed area plan alternatives. Four public meetings were held f011owing notification of all property owners in the study area under the County's lurisdictinn_ nt whirh nlnnrsim, -*4 - OR ?tG COUNTY HOARD OF COMISSIONERS Action Agenda ACTION AGFADA ITEM ABSTRACT Item tia. MEETING DATE August 22, 1983 Subject: Landfill Reclamation Bids ! Department: Community 'eve opmen —1 I. Public Hearing: Attachment(s Information Contact:- No Albert Kittrell , Director Phone Number: 732-8181 xt., 425 PURPOSE: To consider action on bids. NEED: As part of the final phase of the Northern Fairview Community Development Project it is planned to reclaim the landfill for other purposes and eliminate the health hazard resulting from exposed debris. Specifications drawn for the project called for extensive grading. This, coupled with the proposallof hauling the debris to the Eubanks Landfill , caused the bids to come in extremely high. The following bids were received: Mello onstruction, Carrboro, N. C. $535,000 Propst Construction, Concord, N. C. 630,160 Bids were ab ve budget ($152,000) for landfill reclamation. IMPACT: The lowest responsible bid was approximately five times higher than the landfill reclamation budget. RECOMMENDATION(S): Pa4c,r+ lanAcOl In ftneNn • eighbarhoad Park BID DATE: August 10, 19€33 PAGE 1 OF 2 .._ TZMEs 2:00 PM. CONTRACT0R 4 MELLOTT TRUCKING PROPST CONSTRUCTION C � BB OR CC BB BB APPROX. UNIT UNIT UNIT� UANTITY PRICE TOTAL PRICE � TOTAL PRICE__`_----TOTAL --- �-.�— — ----3�_ - _— — - , --- ---- - - ' LS 1,875-00 i 2,500.00 -i •M 300 SY 12.00 3,600.00 12.00 31600.00 LS 13,660.00 22,000.00 100 SY ' 12.00 1,200.00 12.00 1,200.00 1250 SX 2.50 3,125.00 2.00 2,500.00 � 3 C 23,000.00 40,0100.00 150,000 LB 0.25 37;500.00. 0.50 75.000.00 LS 160,300.00 70,000.00 11.5 Acres 1200.00 13,800.00 1400.00 16,1100.00 � L LS 3,000.00 3000.00 LS......� . ._ , .. _...., .. 19'»200..00 .. ......... 40,O00.00 LB 0.25 62,.500,00 ' 0.50 125,000.00 126 Eo 25i�, 60,00().no h:_1Lt},11 I,1. ,...,t}.ili3 }. 3•itK7.{)ti I�.i ..�•3{}.1}�} 3 Ieighborhood Park 'BID MTE: Auqust 10, 3983 PAGE 2 C3F 2 ' TIME: 2:00 PM CONTRACTOR MELLOTT TRUCKING PROPST CONSTRUCTION r t 98 OR CC ..r.r.r.r . i APPROX. UNIT UNIT UNIT -- QUANTITY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL ; LS 3 .250.€30 40 OOQ.00 10,000 LB 0.24 Too > 0.50 5,000.00 LS 8 000.00 60,000.00 1.3 Acres 1.200.00 1,560.00 1400.00 1,820.00 - i 4 ,000.00 51000.00 LS 10,000 LS 0.25' 23500.00 €3.50 � 5,000.00 1200.0q 1 ,200.00 1400.00 1,400.00 wl. ww.r wrr♦ _ �Y. 1,600 LF 10.40 16,000.00 20.00 32,000.00 , 4,240 LF 3.50 14,700.00 3.00 12,600.00 LS 2,0 00.0D �a:stet tl 3,000.00 35,57.050 •` �� CARpj}i 30 160.00 f --- 1 �-�-is-'�-r; a Y j openel publicly, _ � •r� j '. F tlHed to be true d accu te. - 6231 :, t K. .0 S 17.1�R July 30 1983 :. August 17, 1983 ORANGE COTTNTY PLANNING-4 DEPARTMENT THLJSBOROUGH NORTH CAROLINA 27278 iti7 t EgFiLJ HARMON YOUNG STUDY AREA NARRATIVE The Board of Commissioners adopted the Land Use Plan for Orange County in September, 81 , A major concept of the adopted Plan is the designation of commercial land/or industrial activity nodes of various types and sizes at major intersections in the County. As part of the on-going process of refining the Iland Use Plan, it was intended that the designated activity nodes would be subject to further scrutiny and refinement by the Planning Staff and Bo arid as area studies. To achieve this objective, a number of area studies Were included in the Planning Department's work program. Due to considerable development activity in the vicinity of the 1 -85 and new NC 66 interchange, designated in the adopted Land Use Plan as the HB~4 Harmon Young canercial Transition activity node, the Board of Commissioners on January 4, 1983, following consideration of the Piedmont Power proposed amendment to Land Use Plan, rezoning and special use permit, directed the Planning Department to review and revise the adopted plan for the HB-4 activity node as the priority area study. The study, herieafter to be referred to as the Harmon Young Area Study, is currently 6erway' The study area includes the area in Hillsborough and Eno Townships !generally defined by the Eno River in the north; Lawrence Road and Colonial lls subdivision in the east; Duke Forest - Eno Division in the south; and Cornwallis Hills subdivision, Flint Ridge Apartments and old NC 86 in the st, Portions of the Town of Hillsborough and the Town ' s extraterritorial planning jurisdiction are included in the study area. Those areas will be 'considered throughout the study period in cooperation with the Town of Hillsb IF.rough which has indicated an interest in and desire to work with the County regarding development south of the Tcwvn. The remaining portions of the study area are under the jurisdiction of the County. Considerable effort was made to inform and involve as many residents of the study area, as well as any other interested individuals and groups , in the development of the area plan for the study area. Appendix A contains the schedule of events for the Harmon Young Area Study. Since the January 4, 1983 directive from the Board of Commsioners, the Planning Department has| compi \ed and analyzed data on soils, topography, hydrology, vegetation, land use, utility and the transportation system in the study area. This informatin, which provided the base for identifying planning issues and concerns in the area, for specifying development goals and objectives , and for formulating alternative development plans for the Harmon Young Area Study, is presented in the following narrative and is followed by the proposed plan` t r " ; .`:::: ? 1 ' : 4 : ENO lie f ti . . I `,M M.,tii `'rr �� 4,01 ilt ^Y ..lti f, 1 rill, dio, ix df F 1 ii Il ti•1 11 -1 i ill 1 . 1 f HormonYoungAreStudy /\ . ..„„„,,, \ ) i , .... % \---\e, Scale, i./nch x 2000' 1 I !1.1.!!,5 1 0 i=0+ 0;. CO m ` 1 i Pg.3 SOILS Soils in the *city range from steeply sloped, shallow to bedrock soils; to alluvial soils found adjacent to streams; to well drained gently sloping soils . All of these features can be found in the soils in this study area. The type of soil which characterizes an area is one of the most important natural environmental factors in determining land development. In general, as the severity of soil limitations increases in an area, construction costs will esculate because oflthe site preparation necessary prior to construction. Important soils chaacteristics that influence land use include premeability, shrink-swell potential and drainage capacity. The land in the study area south of Interstate 85 features a large amount of Georgeville and Herndon soils . These soils tend to be more suitable for septic tanks and development than many other soils in the County. There are also several large areas of Tatum soil through the study area. This type of soil is associated wiith the streams that flow into the Eno River and, due to slope in the area, tend to be less suitable for development. Goldston and Wilkes soils also tend to be less suitable due to slope problems . Altanista, Chewacla and Congaree soils are associated with wetness and flooding problems and are therefore pcior for development. Much of the land north of Interstate 85 in the study area is developed. The areas which are not developed are generally suitable for development be- cause of the large amount of Georgeville soil present. However, two of the most prominent locations which are not suitable for development are Occonee- chee Mountain and the lands along the Eno River. Goldston soil which is found around the mountain is not suitable for development due to the slope of the land, while Tatum and Congaree soils along the river are unsuitable due to slope and flooding problems respectively. Although there are other locations where soils are marginal for development, the majority of soils located in the study area are suitable for development. To classify the soil suitability for various uses, the report entitled a Planning Guide to the Oranee County, North Carolina Soils ilrvey was used. This report prepared by the Orange County Planning Department and Soil Conser- vation Service combited soil types into suitability categories based on similar characteristics . These urban suitability groups are shown below matched with the soils found in the area study. Urban Suitability Groups 1-C Georgville 2 to 6 percent slope Herndon 2 to 6 percent slope Hiwassee 2 to 6 percent slope 2-C I Georgeville-Urgan 2 to 10 percent slope Georgeville 6 to 10 percent slop& Herndon 6 to 10 percent slope Hiwassee 6 to 10 percent slope 3 Tatum 8 to 15 percent slope I Pg,, 4 1 • Urban Suitability Groups (continued) 4 Enon - 2 to 6 percent slope Lignum 0 to 3 percent slope 5 Enon 6 to 12 percent slope 8 1 Goldston 6 to 15 percent slope Wilkes 8 to 15 percent slope 9 Tatum 1.5 to 25 percent slope Goldston 15 to 45 percent slope Wilkes 15 to 45 percent slope 10 Atlavista 0 to 3 percent slope Chewacla Congaree The table below Lists various development land uses and breaks down the urban suitability groups as being good, fair, or poor for the various uses. The reasons for a poor rating are footnoted at the bottom of the table. Urban Suitability Groups and Use 1-C 2-C 3 4 5 8 9 10 eptic Tank , Fair Fair Fai; Poor (1)(2) Poor(2) Poor (3) Poor (3)(4) Poor (2)(5; beorption i Fields I oellings Good Good Fair! Poor Poor(6)(7) Fair (3)(4) Poor (3)(4)(7) Poor(2)(5) ithouc to emen t +ellings Good Good Fair Poor(2)(6)(7) Poor(6)(7) Poor(3)(4) Poor(3)(4) Poor(2)(5) ,th isement all Good Fair Poor(4) Poor(2)(6)(7) Poor(6)(7) Poor(3)(4) Poor(4) Poor(2)(5) =mer- 1 al Build- Bs cal Roads Fair Fair Fair! Poor(6)(7) Poor(6)(7) Fair Poor(3)(4) Poor(2)(5)( treetS perks slowly (4) slope Wetness (5) floods ) depth to rock (6) shrink-swell (71) low strength I 1 t t 2c /V • .•.,:... ., 4:!::,:::i.:.fi c itea . ram Rivd, „..." 4 ./. 4'. :-::Ar::41,eM;M:ii: .4-..:f. iviii (rip to le, 2 if: ... i A-.,..., ilk. 1 ItibilL Vitt y:,}:V �: ~�1: :::,i� M I 4" I�M;:•J t {;C.:;:ti}ii•:.is IG * .44;1-:1.'t„*10:0 i>p...,.. ,,--voirgotip.....4 , fb.rn, Ai. I, f.:i,.': *' ••J. r r.;J mil.•.:A.:1`I"' fc ' e -111111, Rat, . *A*I% /111144 ... ....:.:,:.T .......„. . sli. ....,."' Nt ..111. 2C ICI IV jirilliNdrikprilliP ' INI11' Isi Ily144114r i 10 4,,,, 41019k i Mill 2;•,.., liviimiii-Ni...,...,,:e...! 'Ala!G r.r,r .. r.,: :H_I' t 1 fir'if 4 i _ ^�" HcrrnonYoungAreaStudy . cz), SOILS • URBAN SUITABILITY GROUP BEST WORST S5tlle' /ir, h a.2OOO' 1 E i lis; I Pg.! TOPOGRAPHY The topography of the Harmon Young Study Area is typical of the Piedmont: hilly with some areas characterized by steep slopes and other areas by relatively flat terrain. Elevations range from a high of 859 feet at the top-of Occoneechee Mountain to a 1owlof 490 feet along the Eno River. The most severe slopes are located in the northern and northwestern part of the study area along the Eno River and around Occoneechee Mountain (See Topography Map) . Relatively flat areas between 600 and 7 60 feet in elevation are scattered throughout the study area, but are most notidable south of Interstate 85 between Old 86 and New 86. Generally the area slopes in a northerly direction toward the Eno River. It also slopes easterly away from the high elevations in the western section of the study area. Numerous ridge lines run in a north south direction through the study area. These ridge linesIvary in elevation. Poplar Ridge located in the northwest cor- ner of the study area, has a high point of 733 feet, while a ridge line just south of Oakdale Drive has a high of 716 feet. Another ridge line runs south along New 86 from lithe intersection of Old N.C. 10 to the approximate southern border of the study area. Slope is a major element impacting the suitability of land for various uses. Slopes exceeding 15% (15 feet of vertical change per 100 feet of horizontal (dis- tance) present a constraint for the potential development of the land. Slopes of this nature are also economically infeasible for utility facilities. Slopes of 15% or greater liare located along the Eno River, Cates Creek and around Occoneen- chee Mountain. The majority of steep slopes along Cates Creek are located in the area where it passes under Interstate 85 on the north and south sides of the Interstate. 1 i ..::::::::::::,* N'-'. wilirovp.61: 71:::::i:::::51 l . 40,..4„. .,,, ..1.f.. 1-...,.:\s.,, , .^4110.. 41. • - tiliW 0 = thpniall&W",..,.::ti--,t OrAillftli S - -,-- , 01090 ..,,,r.ii*:1:;),7.:::1-._ (0 .9 .c-- Z.4 1.4 z# ,_ .. :: ,. ay ire, .:1::::"' ..if,'::::',i.::%it i.,.;;&:-...,:i7. 45 (----1",#:•.: ::::;... :;>�:y e `--ti `''. ergs 'S Pio r; V .. g P' .......01...ek. .11 ..... i:�C '�;'^ •/??,is v'•;�:Ja✓r:.•intii�:I ,/y y .,v;• rid:: \ �'•'�i i 0),.,..... ....- --. .........0."--- 1444' , ' .kt, I .' AV ,.„..... .‘,... • ,::. .1A44 ic„ (8 1 ,,,.///i ., .. i / 1 .1 ..,41907 ._. . # :" IL ! / billiiii.''..11" ' ......700 ,� Zrhti -- �, I O '.�AILIIII 4- \ Q0- 1.,700 *, Lsztati.. rz.z.,..t.,,,.„: a N+ k it „. . .. 1 '. -r - Harmon Yours Area Study TOPOGRAPHY ,,„,,114 LEGEND' .,.1U,- Scale I inch 2000 „mom Critical Slope area r �. (Slopes of 15 or Greater) 1 !TiSliel_! ,-SW' Typical Tops Line o loon z000' ,tea' 1 HYDROLOGY Hydrology deals with the occurance and distribution of water. More spe- cifically, analyslis of the hydrology of an area includes consideration of the factors preci'pitaltion , stream drainage systems, surface and subsurface water resources and potential for flooding. Orange County receives about 43 inches of precipitation a year. Although the precipitation is fairly evenly distributed throughout the year, the di-rest season is the fall . July and August are the wettest months with the precipi- tation total augmented by thundershowers. Major Features. The Eno River is the largest flowing body of water in the Harmon Young ArealStudy. It is located along the northern boundary of the area study and is one of the main streams in the Neuse drainage basin. The Eno drains into the Flat River in Durham County. Cates Creek is the second largest stream in the area study. This creek flows in a northerly direction into the Eno River and is located between Old and New 86. Stoney Creek the next largest stream in the area study, originates in the southeastern corner and flows in a southerly direction, where it inter- sect with a second branch of the Creek. Stoney Creek eventually flows back to the Eno River. There are a number of small impoundment areas located throughout the study area. Most of these were, or are, being used as farit ponds. Drainage Patterns. With the numerous ridge lines running in a north- south direction throughout the area, the majority of surface drainage flows in an east-west dilrection. The surface drainage in the north-west section of the study area flows into a number of small lunnamed streams and creeks that empty into the Eno River. Runoff from the central portion of the study area flows into Cates Creek which also empties into the Eno. Stoney Creek, in the southeastern corner of the study area, colleets the majority of drainage in that area. Floodplains . I Floodplains are those areas which will be inundated by water in a specific storm event, normally defined as that storm whose probability for occuring is once every one hundred years. (SEE Hydrology-Vegetation Map) . There are two streams in the Harmon Young Area Study which are associated with a 100 year floodplains as designated on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineer Flood Maps . The Eno River is characterized by a large area within the northernmost edge of the study area that would be considered 100 year floodplain, while Cates Creek has a more defined, narrower floodplain that runs the entire north-south length of the area' study. Development lmitatiomsalong streams with floodplains and potential for flooding must be observed. In addition, if a stream is within a water supply watershed, its impOrtance is compounded as pollution or sedimentation of the streams could result in eventual damage to the water supply source. Pg.9 • 7 VEGETATION Existing vegetation is an important feature in the development of land. Land with mature existing vegetation is more valuable for development pur- poses than land that has been cleared. Subdivisions and other residential developments with large trees and a fair amount of vegetation are more en- vironmentally p'easing than developments with cleared land. A large part of the land in the Area Study is forrested. Vegetation includes mixtures of poplar, elm, pine, oak, and cedar trees. Several large areas of mature trees include Popular Ridge, the area south of Inter- state 85 between Old and New 86, Duke Forest, areas along the Eno River and around Occoneeciiee Mountain. Most other portions of the study area are characterized with smaller trees and underbrush. 1 _ _ ^ ) z ~ .10,..',*::::,::''.i,',..,- .'.:1 -i'''l• .,t '' LA.. .,,, '''..1.' •'3...".,..,'."-. .....,",i,r4..r?'..*:;:.?"'4,.*VV.:1,4. 1..".'.?.,f. trt :".4,..;.'"^"- 1_,... , 00.0.'''* ,47.:,7"......,..,,,,:',...::::A.:4,..'07,... ,;'•.4.1.;;.,! „rdrA"--- . ,...,11.7,--e.... ,r,..,z7. . -•,..,,....i...,_:4--,.--,,,--_,t..,,,-)„.,,,_„...-.4_1....41,,-"?....:-14...n.i.,40-.1-•,_.,,,,,-.1'..1-• „1.5..."....-1-7.st.,,...;?:,,,3,,,,,,-, .. .,w..4 i.f;4"roi::,.::::.. A . ;.; •41--4- 14 .1":=4.)17::iti-4.1,':?,:;';''..A;44,'.1'.,;70-0',ii,. .,11 v.L: qt:,:?.. ,.f..4..,,...4,...K::;'(:-.;:iN:-.*%:- _, ,,tt.›,,,-„.,..iiit44., r„.1 I 1 P ' 4■01' ,4:-,i '""VP " ' l'IZ ,,, ...107,:::;,:,......-: :::::::::::-,,:,:,....*7 *..;t,,.• .,,,,,, ..,...,,iiie 1 . 4.lif:SA V" '''''''''' +.r..'' ':'. t4;0 Irili411W45.*:" ,Ri^:S.: "P'{.-E.,44';'!",P,;:. • *".*"." 4‘,.._ .:t ,:t. I .:it:Iti.‘" •■1 '.• ...'n‘-:.Pr.,, ',44,,,.. '-3'_...",'7.1......7:,:,::,:?::::::.:MQ.,,,...: ....' . ' _ ,......`" .?,..,...4;,`?::-..-3,\ `...'I.:, *(,... , •:;', .0.- ..... "13.7`. k 4',.:t"?..,'''' ,:rt.,..4-4.,..'' „or....,,,,s0"--,,, ,...•4, . „, of„....13 ilk / ..----- ,...„.it'7,■. ir•?:-"ar:.'- 4..-.71,7- .'....-3.-1',:.. '.'.":'-.,, ,..-”.4**t,. ' .. "'-'4,.,-.'.;4•.,;;....v...4-;-'41".-2'::',..t,:4 4-44,,:kli-1:-:rt.;;3ii, „:-,:::. • -:-.)"..r ,,, ...•F 44-.. S:: -."''''.41.:--' .."' Harmon Young Area Study 1 1 iima 100-YE0 FLOOD PLAIN 1...N"..... DRAINAGE DIVIDE !j.!TI.1-i 0 10001 2000" 3000' _ I .. .. . . pg~ ll EXISTING LAND USE Residential Areas. The predominant land use in the Harmon Young Area Study is residential . flesidential development is characterized by single family structures , apartments, and mobile homes . There are a number of small mobile home parks scattered throughout the area , the largest being Byrdsville with approximately 46 mobile home spaces . Orange Mobile Estates is the second largest with 42 spaces. Both of these are located off Old N.C. lO. The Area Study can be divided into four major residential areas: 1 ) Old N.C. 86 south of Interstate 85 which includes Flint Ridge Apartments , Flint Ridge subdivision and Cornwallis Hills, a subdivision which is currently in the process of being developed; 2) Tuscarora Drive area subdivision; 3) Colonial Hills subdivision and the residential area along US 70-A; and 4) Joppa Oaks Sub- division area, wh h includes Byrdsville Mobile Home Park, Orange Mobile Estates and W7 }dwpod Subd /sion'Phose I . Commercial Ar6as. The majority of commercial uses in the Harmon Young Area Study are located along Old N. C. 86 north of Interstate 85, All of these commer- cial uses are in the Town of Hillsborough' s corporate limits . These commercial uses include the Daniel Boone Complex) Daniel Boone Square and a number of other smaller individual commercial uses. There are also four mobile home sales lots that are located in this area. Commercial uses located in the Town of Hillsborough 's Extraterritorial Plan- ning Jurisdlctlon, | but not in its corporate limits , include the commercial com- plex at the northwest intersection of New N. C. 86 and Interstate 85, FCX and the Farm Bureau office/ located- off New N.C. 86, and McDonalds located at the south- west corner of the intersection of Old N. C. 86 and interstate 85. There are three concentrations of commercial uses in the County' s jurisdic- tion. These include the commercial uses along New N.C. 86 at Interstate 85, the uses on the south Side of Old W.C. 10, and the Woods Brothers commercial complex along New N.C. 86 the southern boundary of the area study. Industrial Areas. There are seven industrial uses located in the Harmon Young seven, four are located in the central section of the • ., - area study around p.s. 70A and New N.C. 86. These four include: White Furni - ture Company, Wil ro Electronics , Champion Products and Hines Liner Corpora- tion. All of these are within Hillsboroughs extraterritorial zoning jurisdic- tion. The only other industrial use in the Town's extraterritorial jurisdic- tion is the Brady 'company, lmcated �p�r��elly within the north central portion � � of the study area, Piedmont Minerals is the only industrial use located with- in the corporate l m|ts of the Town. This use is located in the northwest section of the area study. Chandler Concrete Company , located on the south side of Old N. C. 10, is the only industrial use located in the County's juris- diction. Pg. l — - i Hublic Lands and Ut( l <ties. Other uses not considered commercial industrial - or residential ln n�cure����d� in�lude the prison and the North Carolina Depart- , h Interstate ment of Transportation property located at the southeast corner o f nt�rs�a e 85 and Old N.C. 86. These properties , and the Hillsborough sewage treatment plant located along the Eno River, are considered public lands on the Existing Lens Use Map. The Piedmont' Power tract proposed for development as an operations center and located south of 1~85 on N,C, 86 and the Duke Power office located north of 1~85 on old N.C. 86 are both designated as utilities on the map. | ' | � ' | 1 I i --Th...0----N11111111111.:1, • *I7:7::.. . ....____,,, ,,,-- •:-»•-•;-:.,,,,i !r,,,•:•iiii:k.1:::: ;;:',:;:,,: :: ::.;'.•• — -.0-2- 4141, .•::::-::::::: :Mini:: .•:::':.8:::;:.;::;•.:: • itlizAtiftEiffitSa.l.:::,..*: "•:-:::8:-.:;.,':-•:•••'::::::.?•:-•-:':::::::;.',.',,':;:::::::; ciatil-V z:::-.=.•-•It'ziticiti:E.eit't.Sti'4:,•Ma 1 ''''' .,,ii:1:::.i?;: :::::•.; ;;:"-•:::::::::, i • il./3 iiiiisst::::::::::::-1--- 1.: — ,,]::::::::i.i:::::::::.....-::•:.m„:,....,..„ 8 I IIt:$:1 4,– 't ' -"-- -......•:,;;;;L' ''''1":".„..._, ....„. * 11 .:.::::::::::::. ,t. .4, \ "1"4" • ""...iiiiiiiiiiiliitil.si,k,,,..,..„.., c7)i .........- = . _,. :0:pc, ...... . -_.... ,....,.... Isar .." ''•:-•:•V' .,,.., :.:g...i;M::::•.•.,.... #41.- ,0002.11,5dilir ..". ''''',„'?" ,..etc'"- -f:::::•:::::::". .-""*.-'',,i..'',:i.:-..:,•,:„,.„, • i fressia, .., mom........0 ''..7. r.0-4.7,:,-,r e'..51:LV,,:i:::::.,4.-,, 70 , ) ---# . 742::::: . ., ---4.!,... • -..... 3,-- 8 S r"..-. r tizizi stirim • .:,...-- t•Y"'"-...••••• 75"...'..."-c.....:;"*". .. .. ...VPME:•::::: : . . , -,-*•:....5. -tills .-.... :IEW!..,: lit :;- 1111 ,„,-;;;;;:.! :f.4g!..1,Y.7i;'.:W --'. I i . • t.',..t....ik IE;FP 00 441111111.41'*-is '4-74:07:,-4. -',A.111, NO'. .144 ' • "" ..` lir -2;7471117PZtill411444., ' — .-or.a4.-... 1111116 ..... «.. . ' 811.811# -Ap' 4i,„ !.;::,::.:.;„ 1144 -":;;;;■., :;i4i:, a 1 siroi 1P%. .....4•.1. ,•,.. I . 4.11,orkfj". :.,.,,i:it.:I 1 7.1•Ift:M 0.**P....f::::::::70.:::::::::::::: 01 y 0. ' \*: if Y.■.■.........::,:3:.:4::. ..... IF ., ■:f...S... i :.::::.Z. ::::•::. '..':....:.:. ne, I ,...- --........... ...,.„ .,. i;i:•,,,,, ';;:::::::::'," ':?'...::::. .00" 1 1 Aili„„ ,.;.:•.;:„. ':–.....------.--..*.,:,."..:'E::.:iA•.::;;:;;;:::':'::: :* .:•::::: , •.?,.:',:i4.„%.:,::::.:: . —.,:$1,1c, •.... . .,..... 86 • ....,....,....,n4,,,,i. -••:-:•.:..:4•••: .,.. ::,..:-:.---x. Harmon Young Area Study IN EXISTING LAND USE ca.., 1 Legend, i 'lull" POWER LINE 11(11$.1 IF 2 .IN SINGLE FAMILY RES. ll - ' 'j UTILITY I 1M MOBILE HOME PARK F.i4:-7:1 PUBLIC Scale, I/nab-2000i , R5:-.;;P:1 MULTI-FAMILY RES. :::::_y: QUASI-PUBUC . _ n MI COMMERCIAL p..., 7 AGRICULTURAL 0 100,04 2000, 3000/ I M INDUSTRIAL • VACANT - I I . I i I Pg. TRANSPORTATION The means and manner by which people and goods are transported influence the physical development patterns of an area. In the Harmon Young study area, the road system serves two functions: `traffic movement - land access For an indl dual , the performance and adequacy of the road system is evaluated by objectives such as speed, convenience, safety and cost. For the county as a whole, evaluation iS based on broader objectives such as the impact on the economic growth protentiml{ for an area and whether the existing character of the area is disturbed. The Harmon Y6ung Study area contains a relatively adequate road network. This network is cbmprised of roads classified as interstate (1-85 and Proposed 1-40) ; arterials (NC 86j old 86, and US 70) ; and collectors (old NC 10, SR 1006 Orange Grove Road) . The! classification system used describes roads according to the level of service. In general , the higher the road classification, the more intensive the service provided;I that is the greater the access provided to large land areas and within longer disltances. Lower road classifications indicate the primary service provided by the rioad is access to individual land uses and access to roads serving a traffic movement function. Interstate and arterials are designed to provide the best service and shortest travel times employment, shopping, education and population centers. Collecto roads provide area with access to arterial and interstate roads . All other roads are classified as local roads which provide the least intensive traffic movement, but the greatest land service. There are three major areas in the study area that presently are not serviced by the road system. Itlis is due primarily to absence of development in the area. These areas inclUde the area south of 1-85 between NC 86 and Old 86; the area between 1-85 andIUS 70 bounded by Old 86 and the Colonial Hills subdivision, and the area locatedlsouth of the Eno River outside of the Hillsborough extraterritorial planning jurisdiction in the north eastern corner of the study area. The proposed 1-40 corridor will link 1-85 near Hillsborough to the existing 1-40 terminus atithe Research Triangle Park. Where this route crosses Orange County, access to other employment certers such as Durham, Raleigh, Chapel Hill and Research Triangle Park wil be improved, thus increasing development pressures at the proposec interchanges . 1 Between ChaPel Hill and Hillsborough,four interchanges will be sited: (1) NC 86 and Weaver Dairylroad, just north of Chapel Hill ; (2) New Hope Church Road, just east of NC 86; (3) pid 86 just soPth of Hillsborough; (4) 1-85 southwest of Hillsborou This third interchange is located in an area underserved by the existing road network. To accomodate new Orange County residents or commercial/industrial users , and the associated increase in traffic, a collector -route May become necessary tO' llr old 86 and NC 86!, Suggested route locations are included in this section. rg. In addition to the road system, the study area is traversed in a southeasterly direction by the main line of the Southern Railroad. While, primarily proViding freight transpor , the line is proposed to become part of the commuter rail system between Raleigh and Charlotte. Public transportation is not feasible for areas with population densities as low as these contained in the study area. There are two taxi services originating in Hillsborough. Interstate bus service is available from Chapel Hill and Durham with one flag stop in Hillsborough on US 70 west. The council on Aging Sponsors mini-vans to transport elderly and handicapped residents to nutrition, recreation and medical facilities . ~ Bus or Harmon Young Area Study NSPO--- ION Legends AN INTERSTATE HIGHWAY MINOR KM ARTERIAL MINN PROPOSED. INTERSTATE 40 Scale-linch-2000' _ rg UTILITIES WATER. Public water lines are available throughout the Harmon Young Area Study. 7T17—Town of Hillsborough's water treatment plant, located on Ben Johnson Road, has a capacity of; 3 million gallons per day. Water is distributed throughout the area via a 16 inch water main which parallels Faribault Lane. This 16 inch line feeds smallr lines thoroughout the area. A 12 inch water main extends down U.S. 70-A t4 the eastern boundary of the study area. A 12 inch line will also be extendedIdown Valley Forge Road and will follow Cates Creek and the Southern Railroad to the property presently being developed as Wildwood Sub- division. An 8 inch main extends down and parallels Orange Grove Road. An 8 inch line alsolextends down Old N.C. 86 close to the intersection with In- terstate 85. A 6 inch line runs under Interstate 85 to the prison. Along old N.C. 86 from! Oakdale Drive south to the boundary of the study area runs a 3" line. (SEE' Utilities Map) . SEWE . Sewer limes serving the study area range in size from 4 inch to 10 inch Ties. The Towri of Hillsborough's sewage treatment plant, which is located along the Eno River close to the Brady Plant, has a capacity to treat 2 million gallons per day. Sewer lines are not as prevalent as water lines and only cover a por tion of the study area. A main 10 inch gravity line beginning at the prison runs along Old 1%ii.C. 86 back into town. Along Orange Grove Road runs a 4" force main which connects to a 10 inch gravity flow line on Old N.C. 86. Cornwallis Hills, a new subdivision off Old N.C. 86, is served by a 4" force main which is pumped back to Oakdale Drive. Wildwood Subdivision will be served by an 8" gravity line which will flow to a pump station on the south side of the Southern Railroad. it 1411 then be pumped by a 6" force main back to another pump station located at Cate S Creek just south of U.S. 70-A. A 4" force main runs from this pump station to the Hillsborough sewage treatment plant. 1I i. r .. • " Z " 2 S C .* * ' 440, • 'mow. m:; 14'44 I ."..---■ 0_ IA ` [] * ... tr * Q1 i. . - .:::iif;t::::::::".:,.:,?;i:,:i:::,i-gg::::i k ......„ w 10_; •I ;..0_f�: �'� \ •• ' f i 1` • . ,.:::::,w,;,:.r- ': Vii.: :'1:`Y,•,;:;' .( %S. `. . BUS ' +`-... Gam`, :ti •_ _::;,1`3 \ �"... I w• 0_i �: $ I. "l.M•'+�` SY`Y- et IL7 t ♦ J'1' 'wrw� ,.. �► d 1 f • r ''�• 2y ' � V M �' 1 ' olk 0 *.', i'T 0.7,;;,--;,-,''' \-,. r • ) - c ' 1• 1 i �! rpa+M, •• r� r c, 4i. 1\ • '� iii Y• `� Li, ,. N\ , i \ ...-N-:.a•tiv,.. ...-N-:V.4.A ;:f-1,,,......;14., li k \:, I I `. \ Li--- -*-->*-1-:. 1 . se' \e6 - - ,=-L.FoLer,r.,:r. 1 \ f .1 Harm' on Young Area Study 1. UTILITIES s Legend: \,,.....„S --�--• FORCE MAIN SEWER . ...-- GRAVITY SEWER ❑ 'SEWER PUMP STiA►TIOI`! Scale• /inch�'��C?C?C,a' la !SEWER TREATMENT PLANT -,=n,:•..• ;WATER MAIN ° 'woo' I i I 1 SUMMARY OF 1S*JES AND PROBLEMS Zoning and Larid Use o reconciliation of the locational advantages of the area for non-residential development with protection of existing residential uses from incompatible land uses o provislion of adequate buffers between residential and non-residential uses and between land uses and major thoroughfares o lack Of regional type shopping facilities in the immediate area o minimization of uncontrolled residential development o relative unavailability of good jobs locally and the distance of homes from current workplaces o undesireableness of heavy industrial development in the area Housing o problems arising from absence of adequate development controls o availability of affordable quality housing o impact of future residential development on property values Transportattion o traffic congestion and safety problems on NC 86 due to increased deVelopment activity o potential traffic congestion on Old NC 86 associated with the construction of the interchange on 1 -40 o absence of a connector road between NC 86 and Old NC 86 south ofl 1 -85 Water and ISewer o extension of sewer and water lines throughout the area Sanitation o problem of failing septic systems , particularly in the „loppa Oaks subdivision o drainage problems and standing water in ditches and the attendant health hazards o lack of well sited and advertised green boxes for public use o Iroad litter along NC 86 south Public Safety' o excessive permitted speed limit on NC 86 south in conflict with access; to site requirements o potential rail accidents in developed areas o levellof police and fire protection, particularly in Joppa Oaks subdi,i/ision,due to non-state maintained roads and small water line sizes respectively o risinig crime and vandalism due to increased development in the area o lacklof a domesticated animal control ordinance Recreation o lack of a public recreation area for both passive and active recOational use Educational Facilities o redlistricting due to population influx o inadequate capacity of existing school facilities o stte maintenance of Joppa Oaks subdivision road system to permit use of roads as school bus routes Environmdrital Concerns o lOcal flooding along NC 86 and in Joppa Oaks subdivision o s r il erosion problems within the area 1. GOALS - OBJECTIVES - RECOMMENDED ACTIONS OnJanuary 4, 1983, the Board of County Commissioners directed the Planning Department to/ review and revise the adopted Land Use Plan for the HB-4 Harmon Young Commercial Transition activity node within six (6) months, due to increased development pressure in and around the activity node. Since the Corrimissioners' directive, the Planning Department has held a series of Township Advisory Council meetings and public meetings for the residents of the area within the jurisdiction of the County. Through- out the months of June, July and August, three (3) Township Advisory Council meetings were held with the Hillsborough TAC , two held jointly with the Eno/ TAC. Four (4) public meetings were held following notifi - cation by letter and in the local newspaper of all property owners in the study ariea under the County 's jurisdiction, The meetings were held to inform the residents of the purpose and scope of the study, to review the results of the community survey mailed to each resident of the study area in the :County's jurisdiction, to consider development problems and concerns and draft goals and objectives and to discuss the proposed and preferred Oen alternatives. Based on the base information, input from the local residents and the results of /the community survey the following goals , objectives and recommended actions are proposed: Land Use and Zoning.. GOAL: To protect the integrity of the residential areas while recognizing the locational advantages and opportunities for non-residential development of the area. ObjectiveS: To allow low density, low impact non-residential development Iof the area including commercial and industrial uses. To provide effective physial buffers between residential and non-residential uses and major thoroughfares . To encourage neighborhood and regional oriented commercial commercial activity in the area. Recommended Actions: 1 Approve only those rezoning requests which will not be detrimental to the overall development of the area. Enforce buffer, setback and screening requirements between uses and along thoroughfares. Encourage non-residential development which will make good jobs locally available to the residents of the area without environmental and aesthetic costs to the area, 1 Pg.2I 1121111i GOAL: The development of adequate, reasonably priced, safe housing of an appropriate variety in proximity to jobs and daily activities . Objectives: To provide affordable housing in the area. To maintain owner occupied housing in good condition. Encourage improvement and maintenance of investment properties. Encourage homeownership within the area. To encourage good development design and standards in residential communities . Recommended Actions: Review and enforce development standards contained in the County's ordinances. Encourage imporvement and on-going maintenance of investment property. Adopt and enforce a Housing Code for the County. Transportation GOAL: The improvement of existing transportation facilities and vehicular circulation within the area and other parts of Hillsboro Objectives : Provide improved access along NC 86 south and Old NC 86 to 1-85. Improve access and vehicular circulation between NC 86 and Old NC 86. Recommended Actions: Request the N.C. Department of Transportation to assist in the development of a county-wide thoroughfare plan. Request the improvement and widening of NC 86 and Old NC 86 within the study area north to 1-85. Designate and require a right-of-way easement and dedication to the public connecting NC 86 and Old NC 86 south of the Southern Railway line. Require road improvements necessitated as a result of developme activity along the roads designated as arterials and collectors Pg.22 Water and Sewer GOAL: Extension of public water and sewer lines to serve areas which are in need and which are designated as Transition Areas and which can be efficiently served by these facilities. Objectives: To provide public sewer and water services to areas developing to urban densities. Recommended Actions: 'Encourage homeowners and developers to obtain public water and sewer services. 1 tEnter into negotiations with the Town of Hillsborough and encourage the Town to plan line extensions to serve the area. Encourage the Town to review the status of its water supply capability and take action to augment existing supplies. Initiate an inspections process to identify and address failing septic systems within the study area. Sanitation GOAL: Promote the health, safety and general welfare of the area residents. Objectives: To correct the problem of failing septic systems in the area. To improve existing drainage problems and to minimize aggravation of the existing problems as a result of further development. To improve the collection of househcid solid waste in the area. To minimize improper trash dumping and road litter. Recommended Actions: Initiate an inspections process to identify and correct failing septic systems. Encourage DOT to address drainage problems along state-maintained roads. Require new development to infiltrate stormwater runoff on the site and minimize the.offsite impacts. Development of a solid waste collection and disposal system to serve the area. Encourage neighborhood cleanup campaigns and owner maintenance of vacant lots and cleared drainage areas. , ^ , Pg.23 Public Safety GOAL: An efficient and effective system of public safety, including fire, police and emergency services to serve the area. Objectives: To address traffic conTestipn and safety concerns along NC 86. Tio address concerns regarding railway accidents in the area. Kiaintain the current level of police protection as further development of the area occurs. .11n provide for an adequate level of fire protection throughout TO ellmina-ta the incidences of uncontrolled and stray dogs in the Recommended Actions : Recommend that DOT reduce the speed limit along NC 86 until I-bad improvements can be made to address the traffic concerns , als part of the approval process for new development. Develop and train emergency personnel In railway accident procedures rtYcularly where hazardous materials are lnvolved, Encourage the public safety agencies to up-grade patrol of the alrea as development occurs. P/ ovlda fire hydrants for areas served by public wmtmr. Encourage the establishment of Neighborhood Watch programs. Adopt and enforce an animal control ordinance. Recreation GOAL: Local recreational facilities, pcmgrams and opportunities adequate to meet the diverse needs of area residents. Ob'�c��ves� expand and improve recreational opportunities , both passive - and active, for the residents of the area. Recommended Actions: C nsYderation of the acquisition and development of a public r/ creatlonal area south of Hillsborough. .Educational Facilities GOAL: Full and equal educational opportunities and facilities for area residents within a reasonable distance of the area while continuing to improve the quality of the county-wide educational system. Objectives : T minimize redistricting and lengthy travel for primary school s udents residing in the area. rg. 44 !To improve and expand existing facilities or add addition ;facilities as needed to serve the growing hl 9 g population of the area. Recommended Actions: ! Direct the School Board to consider additional facilities or expansion of existing facilities to serve the incoming population. Place the Joppa Oaks subdivision system of roads on the school bus routing plan. Environmental Concerns GOAL: Minimize local flooding and soil erosion problems. Objectives: To reduce existing and prevent future soil erosion problems in the area. To eliminate local flooding problems and minimize the aggravation of stormwater runoff problems by requiring that new development ! address stormwater management and infiltration requirements in the site design approval process. Recommended Actions: jRequest that DOT address drainage improvements in the improvement and maintenance of state maintained roads . Continued support for the Sedimentation and Erosion Control Program Development and enforcement of stormwater management requirements for new development activity. Encourage on-site infiltration of runoff associated with th new � ^ _ Pg.25 EXISTING LAND0SE PLAN The Orange Land Use Plan was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners lin September, 1981 . The adopted Land Use Plan contains land use goal and policies for the county, as well as designates land use plan cetegories for development applicable county-wide. The following land use plan cetegories are designated for the study area: Urben, Land that is within the corporate limits of the Tiown and, therefore, under the jurisdiction of the Land Use Plan for the Town of Hillsborough. Ten Year lir ransition. Land located in areas that are in the process of changing from rural to urban, that are suitable for urban-type densities and should be provided with public utilities and services within the first 10 year phase of the Plan. Twenty Year Transition. Land located in areas that are ih the process of changing from rural to urban, that are suitable for urban type densities and should be provided with public utilities and srvices within the second 10 year phase of the Plan. Rural ReOdential . Land in the rural areas of the County which is appropriate for low intensity and low- 6 slty residential development and which would not be dependent on urban services during the plan period. Agricultural Residential . Land in the rural areas where the prevailing land use activities are related to the land (agriculture, forestry) and which is an appropriate location for the continuation of these uses. Commercia Transition Activity Node. Land focused on des- ignated road intersections within either a 10 Year 20 Year Transistion area that is appropriate for retail and other commercial uses, Public Interest Area. Land which contains public or quas\- 6lic uses such as publicly owned land, research forests or known archaeological or historical sites . Pg'26 � ^ The land use /}an categories , as shown on the Existing Land Use Plan Map, serve as the tong range planning policy guide for land use and development in the County.// Though plan designations were made for the areas within the extra-territorial planning jurisdiction of Hillsborough, this area is under the Town's juisdiction and not subject to County regulation. The Ten Year Transition Area, however, generally corresponds with the Town's extra-terri - torial planning jurisdiction and was so designated to reflect expected devel- opment at urban densities and with urban uses . In addition, 6e Land Use Plan determines the zoning districts that may be applied to a Specific site within each designated plan area. This is particularly nelevant for undeveloped property because all undeveloped property in tHie County is presently zoned R-1 , low density residential , and is not pre-zoned for any other use. All developed property in the County has been assigned the appropriate zoning district designation:: The zoning districts whiCh correspond to the land use plan categories are as follows: i PLAN CATEGORY ZONING DISTRICT Tan 'Year Transition R-I ' R-2, R-3, R-4, R-5, R-8, R-13 Twenty Year Transition R-1 , R-2, R-3, R-4, R-5* R-8, R-13 R l Residential R~l Agrticultural Residential AR, AS Com ercial Transition Activity Node LC~l , NC-2, CC-3, GC-4 01 , ED Public Interest PID The existing d Use Plan for h H8-4 Harmon Young t7 \ ty node study area is based on the following major elements: o / julrisdiction is the designated Ten Year Transition Area for immediate and near future residential devel- opment at urban densities. In addition, the areas asociated with Cornwallis Hills and Wildwood devel- opments within the County's jurisdiction are also designated for urban-type residential development. o Residential development at urban densities will occur mulch later in the development pattern in the areas to the east of NC 86 and north of the Southern Railroad. o Th remainder of the study area is considered appro~ prgate for low density rural residential development. o Th area in the immediate vicinity of the interchange of ~85 and NC 86 is suited for commercial uses. Res- 1 idential uses within the area are not suited for commercial de lopmant, o Duke Forest is considered a semi-public, public interest area. 1 dv.vw;$1 •Ao..0.•--ig ..- ,•,..•..„1,••5 .,w •:• -- -4,1g1'..-••:s_ t r .,,,,r.,..,...;,.,-4:4-.. -,t.t :' ,.:,:.' • , . ...,..„....1:1-s„.-,7,..-:,:nri.:::.• 4:•• . • vt.,, ...... t.,... ;,,s• .-•-'„::••-,+••4,••••-:' . .w:...74: .•.,..._....„ ..... . ,... . .,.: S:5;',:42•4■"."'"'L''''' ' . ' •":rr•• •."-'A':.:" ' .. 1...X.0% SAS)Vfir,.: • . %. ...,.,,,,..,,,... ,,.....,. .. . "17^",°.:•-•,!..!.17;t1Sit,....%- . 7■•': .• •.. ..• %,".&$,,„ .....•,•,........,. . ...224,,,,, _ ;••:,,..':: .Z-V .---,-....,c,,;, ..-.4.r.,4',':.: .. . '. "- '. -7,.,.. . .....$.'..t. M. ....... •'",:,...*:), 'nelif.: •: '''''' '''' 't"...."'' -.F.''- ' '..41:41 -,;Er",..5.::'...... • - .; ,f,•,:::,....%„*X".k.... ....-_,:::::. .;.;:::;::.:.:::::,0 • .,!,. g.,..,::,-7,:,.'..„.,,Ix27.e'...71,e..4,52..„.,-...,17E:..,-,f,:i...0:;:.!.„.... .,...,,,„,.. .,... , !ft.., :.:!'IZ..gii'.. .."':::•.t!4W:.* .,:i5;:q:k0'zi-04 .•:....: --,....:',.; ••„.•:•„,.;$"?.•:..;y:•,;;:c;?•2044•g..444f.V4-9 :: ....;-.2 * '•.M.:;* :; :f ,.V..]::-,7,:i.:.:,:.s;:,,,,, z,gt.4-.:,.-t_z----;-.;.k.. .::.,•i.i.: .,.-.i.....-. .V.sgee,.:::•40.4m0:04...;tp: -••7.1•*•.$ ff.:::i.:::•,'-,'-' :*;‘,;;.': ::..5,;',.,;•45,...7.- .-Ac+.;`,,,:':f:i.:_35. : .::: ..::. :1,,,,:-.7. • .•.,kaA44:: • .. .::. ...,....,„:..........,ilf ......,4, ••••.„ .,,,ik:i..co.rr.c.„, ,,z,...zr,..% N ,•••••.•0-,,,,•::.'. : .•• ,ltk; •3.,;:;'",:.?..'.::::•..7E1:::::,,a..::::::::',-..,!,, , ,••, : -,-.-----..„.....-•:,....,:7......„.„... _....... . ..,„...„•:„. ...—..,...„..... .:.:... .. .:....:. ..., .• ..:.:-...„..,.:0...„-,4..--..,....,-. ...„:..-..,....:,-,.;.b..;..,.....,...........-4414:.::.,-,90,030azt,p„,tt •:K+4 •4.: .• ':„.••• :e. ., .111.1r-: .;i"iif.'g::::a]::Vf`-::::.K.'::::it:i',,...': ilf:::::',.:".:..';:','-'..,. .".,Z. 3?.z.An::',.Z4 :7::':';:r•-:":7-• -”:: ,•- "•:;,› •' •• - "P ; ..',.::: ::,Flii:-:::iF;:i4::: .•,:;:i:iz, :::;;.::,:,..;;;•.,;,‘,,..-:,..:::-''':;-...::.`,f:.:':;2::::"":".."3,V,4-4-":,t....,:::Y.;'.; :',:',, ...y.-. 54.„' ...4 _ }. .•:.?•7...,,:,,, .... 44i.,...\,.. • ;.: -.F.'; ..F.::::F.F..":: ::a..i..."4::7-::::,,,. • ::::;477:-.::':.+-; •:.::-:!::..,,,, -ts,::k. :'....<..N.:,,:•:.`.:,..: -•••::-.'-'7.`•'.:0-4•5'7.-W.66c". -Nskm..-=:: '..., : e e.' %. „.....0.:•0,ML-,:'<.. •:'4,-;;-*.r. •:1-,:i•i•:.r.:-9'• ....:•:•- •::::::::::::::::; •,'.:---:,; -,..."0:-..,•••:,„,..-•-:•;3..,.;:-.4;•?..:,1,4•-,,,4"-J., :-•....--..r......,.c...,-...01M0.-- , "!.......4.. & ...•* • .... V17,;', •',.'N '7-•"••"•514-'• ••-•`•• EVi;:::-,-,'-,:i;:;: iii' •<'•::V••:::.:".•:*;,',.:r•• ••:•:'21••;:• ,-;.„,.'4 ,:s'•::.'.•;:,',:::.....,',..f.:!--;,1,;:;;;;,Z.;!; ,1,..,,,,,, ,,,NN:.z..56v0;,.. of..A.k00 BUS ,4,!i:'',•••-r:t45;'''''-::::::':ii'..::::a..-.:.::::::::'-ni:.•;•;:::::,%;;,,:;!:•„::•:,:-*Z41 .• .:`,-;;;•:.':,: f.i. ::.4":i'.-":: •.:4;':-.1;t; 'f'4".**'W•%5°94. ,2, ft i '-'-':";. -'•i'Z',--;""••K:i:ik'N'".:::":-:::::::'-'..4g:1-....;,`-::::::: :.::•:-I'h•;'•:,.`:-•;• ••;••' -:',::-f:"1.1-.;:......:::::x. •;, -;., 11•;•,.",;,•z=2:62,,..*0„v n ._,■:0.0V,/■.,,,_,W1•2:: .4'.',4';447,1'‘,...:;i*i:::':::::::;:;:;::' :*;:::::;:i::::;?;*:::::•Ki: ='::'.1.-'.`:1,,:;;;; ;:'.ii,»;•!'iz-;....1,:,.-4:',,r.,,;•';',::::,-....?:At;b*.`,AM,t4404_ ,.. ,*7,^,xpor .9& V -',,,,,,....*°ftL."4„''F"..' ?-75.;.',-. .7;"ai::':::','''.:;..;i:::::'':: :•::',.,,r.f:*••::::::i::::::■:;::;:::;,•.1,,'ir>.:'N:',*A':;',7,1;:\:":"'„,;:. ,, •-• ':::',...:.t.c.':: '::74. . .1f4r45.*:"..'...Innotwoc..—cm" . '''''W•*-e .4 =,'..•t,"•-.•'•LF•.*,:i*.,,i'::: :::;:: .;•;!::_i;:i.:;:?..i:;,4;;;;;;.:-.:',.. •-,,„',,,ti•,,'.',z.',•''•,:"••••••j•: -(:,,•;,.'•,-,7:•'..: ',-:i, ; ...1.,?&I•i;''',,v t‘Akozurs, -.4 ...a.),; .., _„:■,,0,0 . ..,„ 11:'''''''''*:::::::•'N.:Iii:'.•MMI:S3,:::::7•5.•*;:•;:':**'"'''''' ,.'..,':".:-W':7?:;:A:'`:::''' .. '.';::.."q"•:.'- cc.'' ''''.00 ,s. ""••• ›:..::::**"..f:•ft: .6,. 0 F1':..'''''.;::,:?-'•:%.::i.*.:1:: ::;:::''• ii;':•'''' '.;iii::::': '''''-`''''..:'':',.'''.,-•i.,',...,',.;:=';.t.fil'.;:;.•":,''''...",".. ..' ^ -',L,V•4•:.';,,,,,,,,,,......)q888maime.=Mignoex$A•„tg se:Vp, •::',...;%•$;,:;•;% 1:::::':•-,... ::•:•:y,,,:f:::'1,•.7,:&.,%:::„:;•:;,:.:',.„.,,,,,,.::,':',..,,;• ,.:,•:.,-, -.,„•;•,,,-.:•:;.•,',„;.,-". ,..• '' .::-.•;,-4-r,'„.••.....A., ,„ ,,,t .:,,. '• , " .bx,.....„ .iS.O■xe,,,f,?•As. 4.4, ' ",,..:.',-,,,,•,:•,::•:,.::: .•-.•::::::::-.,K.:,:;::::•.•:,,,::::::•:•.z.;;•-;,,,:„;4... - •,. 2,.;,,,,,,•,;.„.,,,,„.,,..,..,..,,,,,, ,•,-.- •.. ,•••• A . -,•,..,:o. . °{•`-'4`' * .•',... ,e,VP.:;"*.p Dr,••••4•...:1::,:f.w.. •,...i..f.::•;::,,,::::.*::::•;;;;;:i.x.,-,.... ..,...-•,•:,. . •••,•.•.,,,-,,,,.:;,,,,,.,,,,...:.:-.•,,,.:,--..;., ,...„...-;zoac,-,„,„.. • _,,..„,,, ,,,,,,,m...... .7...;,,...?„.u.,„ r...., ... Iv:::,,,,,xf,,,K,:::•;,. . •%:•.•;*,:,:::.,.....:.•::,:1:1,:tif:::::::••,..,....::,:-:•.-• .., ,:-": ,.:!%.:•k;:i .,:,t,-•:::4:.••,::::. - -••.7,..=•-•?4,am's?Sisme..e.-----4"•••%.`• • 0•;,:.,, `•5.N ... ,<.•-:, !.i,',::::;:$;:i.1,1::::Q* ."?•::.1::::: ::::nii:.:M*:i:::‘1. :....'.'s:-"-':. ;-'"'".....0057%,.... 3; w,, ,A,:esss.;,... 01,4 410. v 4:g.,, ,..:.2::::::K.';in.,:?...;::c$$.::::::::::: :::.:::::,:c:,•::,:;:ii::::ii.,i,,.,,,..::„....:: ::..,.,4,-....:..,*;,,,,,,,„...,........-,:zm,.5.:.::. ' , - k ,i;,,$$,,,,::::,..::::::,:. ;,....,:::::.:::::;::.*::::::::.::::::::::.:;:,..?::::.,,....,.:.:,,..:,,,....:. „,„...:t.,,,,,,,..,r,„;,,-, ...:„.•.,....:,::,,,,,,,,,,,r.,,,,,,........ „,,,,,A,,,.., ,1/4,-.7,3,,„, ,rf• • '....,7;,7•:: ,,,.----4,-: ,;,:i*,,,,,,:-.::::::;c*::::::::::::..,.-...,,,,,,.......,:•::::,- -,,,...1.---1,-:411.,-veze.,,,—•:•,,,,,::-..;)5;„,..,,,:... .4....,Wft,,,: "t,,,s 9. "t•/$ ••••-•:''..- !'''t•-,-..'"*".•-•44'•,''''*:•;:•.i:::::::':'-i';':::**',.,;•z„:.,1'%:',",:,,,," ::::.•:,---,,,,,1,1,5,2,Jr,at.',...,., ...,re.ff,,': ,:„.:...::•.,...,,,,,,,,.::g1;(4.....•,;45= ,s0,45 )0tilifeWAX.,It. • ' N .V .;1.4771:: ::76:*C17,,- ..:::',.'''''''''''''''''''.:.:'..'1,t',1;;;:^""J...."'i::::"::a7.4,:;.r.:',.7.%:?..i.Wigui ...... ..' *,.:'•::.''''..4f1;:,..;:t;:a;.:',••,,,,... .2,4.,,,'4W.4:39}0 .'44. i':-.41•72: '":::;'-'-'17:77:::•-•7'1..;•77;"•;!.r:::--:-.:F!:":::•::•;.")...4."^:g.. .f.:::•i:,...f,.•,16=1;6..L .••„•••••,!,:it-,!.E:.5 ";. ..:, ,,,••4,m,•.t,,,,X. . : ,4 ...„:„..„:.,. :- ... .=","g-2•':::::4;•" ':: ''•-•'''''''''-i":71:''..r.'.. .i.,--;:..::':.::::..-:::::: Y.A.:.".:5143:r;-.",:` ` '`...Z.L: U:t95Z.V.0,404.W.ttti*,.• 7': r.:1;■T;V:47..:4-,Vr.1::',..",::%'-'''..-,S,, . '''+:-.:'-.--':." 'i:*".7%-ri:...*:::.7 ,-,.4:--,i'''''''.','1111711111/1.161.1wihmor..--:,,,sZ"'*::e7:;17-7' ..<40 , 47i:00W "ZialkA ' :::.-.. ' 2....,;;,,-"--'-,--;..-,.=.;•... -.::•-...: , .::•,•••; :. •.•,:-2.,•-•,:;,,,-4...1.•..t. ....'.•.;...:•:::•••--'•:','::• ,..---•zr— :,':'•':•:."..'''"•`-=-:.--4-• ":'•*+51.v.r.•.*.ovvv•-•■••".W•• '44."-$4.'•• ' " ••••. • ,s;: r.;.:Fi.'?:-•:':::Th.';. ... :::'• -.::y.•.....,-,••:::•;:i3,:• ..w...q.,.:.,,,.-P;tf:-..51;: .,..,-,-1!-•:••,'•:.:•:••••••::.:""firsms ...„•;,..:7;;;..!..",-.:',#.7.4...,-,....44,, ':', :-............4:41,.,-.1$ .*. ...,:v .,:„.•••:•,.. ,,..E7.,,,.."-...4„::: :;:-.:::.:..!,.,.; '''„..,...•:7:-.,, "'":-* " '''.-':'..'';:,:...:-..:::;'.'.:T:C.;.,:`,..7,-.,...;.,T;... ..':4.:,:;:,..:;:-.:.",::'::::::...r.... .•: ..„:::•.::;:::::,,f,,,,::-.;...., 7 1.:,,,.,...,^;.,?:"..,..''.;.., 7'.4..V.%*-:,::...,:.'''''..'-• ' ::%. ,7",-*". .*',:, '.`""'S...". ‘7,:. ; ,..'....,:.. .:.'.: ......,,,,,,,,, ,F,;,,,,,r,;:.:.,..p,,,T7;:.,;,,,,,,a",:;'S',,,..::,.:,',.y::.. . +.,71•,..•:::',L.....::':,,, !'!..,::";-. -.,..„::......,;i:1,..1}(4.::,+,■„ ,,,:,.:,-i.,:.....-,..-,.: .. l''':..;,..r:114,,,I.,, ..‘:,•'...:::... .......-.. ..,.':.-''.2. . ..:-... ;A2;::,,,::::,".:f.:".,: :::'-'7,-.''''':''':'''': '''' '''• ';',...:%""; ‘ '; 1-,,, ,v,,,,,,:s,-,..,:-E,:. :--. ig7%.:'..:...-C:;':•71':. ‘....;:,'. ' . ..• ""'' ..'''''..7. ''.":": >,'":"Ki:i'::=7 :: :'."..':,.:.::::i.'_':.;:;";. • ....,... . .. ,:. 1 ::/... : 1,':4:,." .-,t,;,j'',',7,::. i ....1..„,„...„.....,.:,::::::......,,,....„... ,,,....,..,.. ..,,,...... ,I.,..;:,17,,, .:....„,„:„...,,,..:....,....„..........,.....,:,.... .. :.„...:.:::.,,.., :,., . ...,:,.,.,:.:,: .,: ..i ;,., :'...': •- ,..:....:: :...-:-'s' :'":'':.* '.-:- ':': ;'.Q.;::-.,':',:';.,.....,.:L'.;::,,..:...:.•.1......• ;.%J„w..:-:;.,-4,-.•,5:,,,,,k-2„.••,f,•&4,,,,,-„,?:: :::.'4•L--••;31:7;•:-'.?;.-.'?.".•: :1•17.,.:•=-:.4•'••2.•:'•:-•• -.Vi,...t.y• ,,,k..:...-, ... ...,,,,....r...._„:•:; t.. 1,-." •.,1•....•.:..........:.•:••,",• • y-,„,:-.-4'.•',"•••••-:."..."'•";..*" ..: . '.' ' -4-::: :".--•:::•:';'••:*',7•:••Z;.iV•ti-tF.':-7-•: ;', ,,:::,••:„:".:-,:-,-,.:::',1;:,•':,','...;•:::: :: ,,,,,,,•••,r,- 1".,:."••-••:,-,:C-s-r,,,..%.,•, ,••■•: •"-:'•' •,,,,. ,:;',;-•;.:'Z'''''-.''' ,,':' ','''.-:; • '•• ;:•''F-."';':,Y,','"Z'''''.•%:),k4;; ;:7".:4.: 7.-.7!rr71..-''',Ii-'•-•7.'..' "'''''"•"-•!:".----••'' '.::.-•!‘ , ••• :-,J...,,,pwrq'''''''''...'-4*,,,;:,i'•:, ..',' 1...:-':' '-' -.'''• t,,,,,F7-4!„.,t:-•,- ;•. - 1 • '';':,•:;..•:',"•••••rn;••,:';::::,L.-•,7,•••.--•,- .:1:1•0"-:.••,--..-:•••-• , ...,:i•-•:••,--; "'' -:' '1'''' - ' ,,,^-•,,,rwr=t7fio•••:"-:',' '. 4 .':'... '... ,' ',,1-X.:';-: *•*--.:'.....'.... : ' ':.`-`,-",,. ..-.,:r-,:irzi'ilti ...;;;.T,•;,1,, ,,:,..',-.77,-, '. '::::''.--..,::::.'....-7^. ., ae ,',4.•.:,- ..-... .;,......., :..::,- Ngo,7 ., ,.• '.,, ,. . ,,', '`,../".Z.-7,i , .,,• -' ";,:..,:.,. .:,.:.'- `. ,,'.'-■ Harrryt.:)n Young Area Study EX .....N, ,, i !STING LAND USE PLAN LEGEND. z- liegm URBAN 1 pr.7.7--;;;;•."--0..i AGRICULTURAL RESIDENTIAL MIN 10 YEAR TRANSITION tais&?•?-. ,,.?PUBUC INTEREST 1 , , I Scale; I inch w2000' 1 .44xes.:•::•.:., r;•••:::AAi$k 20 YEA R TRANSITION 1 1 RURAL RESIDENTIAL NODE •COMMERCIAL TRANSITION 0 ic00 20 00300d ... — 9g'28 xL. There have b e e n two amendments to the Land Use Plan, since adoption. within the Harmon Young Study Area. On November 22, 1983, a public hearing was held concerning a proposed Land Use Plan amendment to extend the Commercial Transition activity node along the right-of-way of NC 86 to allow Piedmont Power to construct an office building and maintenance/wrehouse facility. A request for rezoning of the property and approval cif a Special Use Permit was also considered at that time. On January 4, 11983 the Land Use Plan amendment , the rexoning request and the Special Use Permit for Piedmont Power Electric Corporation were approved. Subsequently, a public hearing was held on January 24, 1983 to consider an amendment 86 interchange. The enUment at the southwest corner of the 1-85 and NC involved changing the designated 20 Year Transition Area north of the railroad track and the Rural Residential area south of the railroad track to Ten year Transition. a rezoning, southernmost t tan acres to R 4, called U\ ldwoo6 Phase 1 , were approv ed on March 7, l5 3' A second rezoning application for 35 acres August to R-5, called il6wond Phase | | , was approved on gu 1 , 1983^ A third rezoning application for 3~01 acres on the east side of NC 86 to R-4 is cur- rently under consideration by the County. ~� k gr. Pg. PROPOSED LAND!USE PLAN The proposed area plan for the Harmon Young study area outlines key areas for proposed change as follows: o Extend the Ten Year Transition area south of Oakdale Drive to include lots adjacent to Old NC 86 on the east side as well as the entire area to the west of Old NC 86-to reflect ex- Pected development pressures associated with the presence of 1-40 and the interchange to the "immediate southwest of the study area. o Designated existing residential development, in- tluding Joppa Oaks , Byrdsville, Orange Mobile Extates , and Colonial Hills , as well as the "undeveloped area between Old NC 10 and US 70 Business east of NC 86 as Ten Year Transition Area due to existing and preferred development !patterns in the area. 1 o Designate the undeveloped area to the east of the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the Town and south of 1-85 as Twenty Year Transition due Ito the liklihood of the area developing subse- 1 quent to the Wildwood tract and theEtelatiNd ease at which the area can receive public sewer and water service. Retain the Twenty Year Transition designation for the area north of US 70 Business with the exception of the southeastern corner ' located in a different drainage area. o Refine the Commercial Transition Activity Node to reflect existing -development and property lines and upgrade the designation to allow industrial development, as well as commercial development. The area immediately south of the railroad track is also included due to the loca- tional advantages of that portion of the tract. o Improvement of both NC 86 and Old NC 86 to reflect development pressures expected in the area and, I particularly for the latter, the presence of 1-40. DI Provide an access road between NC 86 and Old NC 86 to facilitate vehicular circulation south of Hills- borough and 1-85. Further Detailed Studies Needed 1 While the e*isting Land Use Plan and proposed Area Plan for the vicinity of the Harmon Young activity node indicate the direction of future growth and change in the area, the following further studies should be pursued: o the development of a thoroughfare plan for the County o a detailed area plan on the 1-40 interchanges with Old NC 86 1 A. t 11. y i ;,.:.,....,,:„-_...„,_..........--_,,..,_--_-_-_-_-_-_-----------:-:-:-Z-:-: i.:,:,*:::.1,,":%:::::.,::?:v ..42.b.:M.::::;:%.?::-.11i$:•"":%:§:%:3 .:•.:.,..: 7_7..-..2._...,___-:•••. . --7.4 7.7.:_7.:7,-,,....•.,--- .•..,..:4.r..:•:.% '....,•■:::«:::,:v•.S..•;•,.;',,;•:5•.,•,...,,,,:......• •.•. ';:::::;.':*:.-:::::-:..?:*!:1". ..,..:■.■::'.,:':. ;"..1.i•:'''E".:;:::::i:E"'*::4:-..-------"'"-""-----":-:"*". "----*'7------;"-- -----.- :::'''••••-•"• ,,. :tia:::::::;::::* 3:•.P.:::•: :::;;Z::1::::::':"$:1:`,,■:?..::..:.::::";.. .::::::': -;"'''' :,......„...._""LZfp.- ---_._-',.;-.--,,,:1-"•" .....- *1-r--------.7.7::''1 .....::::::::::::::::::::::::%%::::::::::::::::::::k*'.:::„.:*:"..•:•-.^:k. ::::;::•:::::::::::::•:Z•:".:•%*::.:::::::::::::,::::•::•q••••:;,4::::ft" ''''' '::..., ' ''''::::,:i:Y,;i4Y3..:',i1:., 4^^=..--:-.....7.7.r...7 ...'"•••:...."---"`".";"' -* --..7.-":"-:•.::::- A::::::•• :::: ::;;I:::•:2:.g::::::*::::::::::::;:*::**:::*;;:;:::: ::: ;:-..?:;:;:::,:::',,:i.:.•',:'7.: ..%.":',:i,:.:5..::' ' -71"r-7.7......7. ...- ,.......:••'"72......•"7-- 7_7.7,07.7 ".•::::::::::::::::":•••..•.....:.:•:°:::::•:•:•:.:•:••.:4.:•:";::•:•:•:•:,•:•:•:::::•:;•{:Mi.•%:: 1":1::'*': 11',. %:::' ''' ---------- ---.1'--.---------- --- ....:•:,:.:-:•* ...."*"":A::::::::::::::•-:::::::::::::*;::::}',:x.14: ..f. :::::::: ::.:.... :,...'• : -••• ....*:•%-:•:::•:•:•:•:-:::,*:::•">:>:.:0:::.:..-.....:•:•:::::14:::::,*:-:.:VON::::* ---- --------7---- 1:1;i.::Ai:+,: .:*:::'::::-:.:..', '4:j :::-:-.7e,-....•-.7-:-:......7.7...-_-_- -:-.-"- "'"•-*••••.•-,-7,",,.4..,-,7",:.,.1,..,-:••r-:•:-,--!",•..■.:■2-::•,*-:!•::::::::::.::.$::::.::'.■.)':'.,•:;,S!.•3$•*'f:...:4, 17:•.--- - .2' "- •-•:.7:...."•:•::::•:::"•:::.1••.::^•::::,•::•:::•:•:::••:::..:.::!*::•:::•::!:;,••::•::■•:,:*::::::••::•::::ti•:*::*::::"•:•:::•:.X:4::::":::;•.::::;::•:•::■•$;::•,::::;%::::•:%:;:.A•:$,:;%;•4•:;k::;4•:•;i•;:•IM::•::•:::':;:::::■:•:;::•::.*:I04:;.•N,••:•,K::;::•:::•;Z•:•::•:;;::;•::*:*:;::%.W;;:•:;:;:•e;..:::I:•::;•::::•:•:":::*■•:••4::WC;•:.*;••::•;:!Z:P%":•drn•:.:.*:.*:.:.:I::•:e:A:Zr:•4:•:$M::•X•4:.:1 -7. -`.... X...1.1.■■•,10M•X•X•X.:•:•:$::::.K*W:3.,..:20,••••:•:....::.:4....*:.7.:1,0 ''''-7:::::::,---"*-•*7"' 1:lj::?;: ''.:P Acill..- -----:::::::-----:::-.2----,1-D--7 --- 4 --_ :1::::::::ni,;:".Rigi,***:**,:,:;::.:*01.3:,:i:?k;.I.6::::It;:,*::. , ..--...-"-----7 Im-- ' ..,• •!:7::::!:.,:..i.,,.-...... '.'",...7.7.7"..."-.- ......r....-_-....7. -- ';,•Zd.:••A.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::!:::,4C.:::::KOW:'n:0::• .: ^,!','.:;:,.:,:•.'::'I "• •••:". ".1.1.::,q.-::[‘e,,.•••4:•:•:•:•:,:%,•:4:•,:<•:•• ••:;:$•:":":•,....:`:*1: .*:::c;,':,!,.,';,,::,.,::,:•:;':„:', - .':."":•"'ji 4:'!..,... .••••:`,•■•••V•X%.4",•••••:.*:•C^X•A:W.•:;;7.e'.-:,.::':2.',";:''2:4 91010 ,.-•;:i:i:i:::::,::::;,::::,::- .•:;-:::::::: ::1-s..i. -:-:--_-_-_---- --.77:-:-_- - ,:'4 C:•-•••:., 4,'q.°-• •:•••••"%• ••••''•••••Vd:1$.0.'t ''.-,. '- ,, ---',,' -''''7-7- :',."'•W.i. ::::: ;.*:,....;,:-::::•:,S. ---....,7...-........7.7........ '---.. .. ......*..,.._ 44,+),W.Pect:.;....1,,. •V 1,...C..e. ':'..';,:-..---:,-.:,"■'',',:,--:'4,' ',.1 "L."-a• .•.:;:::::::',Zi:;:f: :::::;:=4.,.;.t...1', 7•:•••••---•7._---,-. -- -r-r ...7.':.':..,•::::1,.4':,,:.''.'!'•;t:+:•.',,.:::,,„ ••-%.?",,,kvs.„•••:'•:,...:•,:,--.F17',.,:,'.1.1-.:..-:; ,-•..,....- ----- .....,::..::';.:,..!;::7•:.-::. ,.:::;,::::;;;;;,,,.:;;;:: ::i,"":-..-,...-„,,-_-,,„„........._ -....- "11010:41r..."' .. „..;.":14',21■.',"..:/...'•:,„..,•',-;..Z,.,„., AN- : .:.f y',..,,',...,,,,',,,A,...r::.. .: - •-•,..,.:.X..:.*:•:.-"4.' ,.:,•,.!:..:-:•:•:::.:-:.:0'..::. -.-----,...- -- _,,,,,,---•-, • . .„,, ,,::.1..i,.:.,....,!....„„• z.,., ...,i...,:, ,., .,.. ...:,.. ,..,,,,,., r.., .,.:, -•::::•:,.....v....,:::.%, ,::.7...x.:?..;•:::*:.*AX:.1-...------.----- - _ -_-„,,,*. . ,,,, . .,i.-,•:.•ii;.,::•,r.r1;:-..z.4 '4.: - -.,. l':-'.•,:::::::: ::,-=,.-' ,' fP.-- :.'•::.:',:::•': ••:;,:x:::::',::A::-:',:::• •:x ---_---------- - -tooirdrt- "lob- :":;•• '"'':':;'!!!:`:P.::',"• ,'Ii:1•••y,' -:tit,; ::;:g:;;:::'• „•?:•::::7::,:::::::::::::::::: ---:-...-_--,...------ :: -_:----------:-:.-- " -'''.'1T.'A::71,;'•,;C:,'...,,;,..';..:;'j,-...,:- :.-41,,,,,i4i.;;;ff,'4.!k.-1;.,:,.; ." -..4*:::.i: ::;:::;::.;.i•.;..,,,,:m;i:0:::::::4:;:k.....:-_-_-:_-_:_:::.7:-:-...--_-_, -....:-:-:--:-.._-...:....: '.....:::,'..,-,i.:•:::•,;,!.:,i:1;'it-L-...;:i'z../:.-.,::- ry:11".:';‘;Z,7,,ite.;;A..,7,'/';':';': : :.."--:-:iff-5:-.--- - "'"•••';';•:7,11':),';',:%.,:...;:,!...,•'.L`..7:,..,...,•:::::,:.-5:;7...!...g:".;-i`Zer.-jkv4".:•,y',.,r,..4 ..:':7::4•,;:,:k'% :74.;4....: $;;::?•::;.: :__:_::.,,::::::::::: ::_.--....7- . .,-001101L 4\ „,•••,..:.•..i. ,, , . . . ,,,,,..,,,,,t.,,,,, , ,.,, 4.,..,. •..„....:..:.,..1.-.•.,.. :.,...14,:tien:::,..0.r, F',,:•:./, 'Iri'.1:g.;0".:1 .t 1:;::;:Z.;:■:.,:::;;•.; ::::::'Z:tc_'"7-.---:"":7..---'7-7----'" ..-'-''..-•-•5*ire"': ' ,i-1 .y, • • ..,..,,...,.. ,„ j.,.,. ,......., ) 1114.... • :.•rt,... 4-',',.•■•• • s.t: , '1,,,,,,•. v...• 4..,. • ' ■••■•:,..,5°■*;:r:,"..:::';::::•:;;*.i';':?:7:0;i::%:,:11.7:71:7„.r,,,7,..,"-...:::...7.n:r.^7,,r . ..... ''''''..'444kb ' . '''''' ' . " '. • ' 0"•"''''''''''.'"5 i: : .::::.Zrill ' """": ::"..,2.0'"'39E.-' ."*le, ....:, '' *;•:::?.''''',",, „..."• „'":.:::::;'::. ;'• .... .'''. " .,":."' ':',:,;.::.1.''." ' ...':■:. .,,... '''';t,.. ".,. ' . ..7;i: ...41m..... .,.:'::::::::*:*■,X;:;: 7.7....L:"„r..." .""'. 7:" ......% ...”:. ' .. ,' ..'' " •::i3„`0 - .'i•'...""., . "''':-'` ,'.,..:1 i•••. .' .:....: '.4 '"'L'''•---: ':::4:/..;''' "--- --....:.«.-":"-_---= ......tiiiK*Ely*,..'.•::':.:,., :...••:'"% `,.•-•:i5."::::.. C'...''•*,;': ''.' ''.'4.'' ..:. *'''r.'''''.;:.- ."'-... '''..::. 2-.7.--'''-'"--:,»•-*-----''''-•-'`7"-----7---"7'-- ".:::::::::::::ei:4'''':'',,:. : ,-...... 117:',', +.:.• .. '-:' ,K Y. ':: ''".:':.:•f„'`..,..`',.: ,X--:---..•-'....---"--"--;.7,7?":-.7"'':-.2"":::E-:-r.."::::::,:::;:::::::•:::&•:::•.• - .'''. :''''•' •1'i;';•:: ' •-•i..;,,.-••1:• • '.•,•, ; -'----**----":"----7:7-7.--7r::::-.:71-77-2-Z--- .:::*,:::::::::::::Kift:i.•,^%, , .. --a yr"4.,•••:‘ q.:•,,,,,,: - ,.., : • ----------7.-7-:---------_-_-_-_- .:::::•::::::1:::::,.....^:-, t.".... - • • • F,,-.•-''.."--;,:z. 1",',._,4:".:.!'.- :' .I"44, :'::::::-'•?. ::•.7-':•:.; ir' 7:-.---------------.*::::::):::::•::::::::::::: :-...:,,, ,• . •- •.„..,.:::::-........-::. .,.... . .-:-..... .,,, ,,,,_:,...,,., -----------.1-"------------------ •:•-:-:-:<•:-::•:•••••••:e.::::-...:Xxv›. • - '. '... :,..•:' :::..-:lc. ...: • • - ' - „... _ .. ' .:-....--_-_-_-7z.--7.--1---„:-Z--_-;-: ..:::::.::::::i:i:::::::Iiiiipi,%&. .:; ...„,• ..,,,..i.6..4ali!:.•,::.,...,i--;::. 4•..-.::::._ ".":::- . ‘'. i - - ------,-------- ..•:::::•:::::*:-:-:-:'. • . •,...„..„-. ..-'4..4.,::.;-:„..:..:-. .t.:' c.- .- .'"• •:-.:•. '',Y,'.•;-,.::....:-•:.:„., ,.,..„,„... , ----_-_-_---_no•... • .a • ...... .o.:, :.,•,-;;•-•Z•-•,..:.F' '-::::,•:* t:%'''• • :: .---vi:','.:;';'.^,:':''r -,..:47.7grilfk:2,11" ' ' ---":""t;'-•-t. ......•""4.:'::::;PX:Oil . : • •-....;i...:11....7-5 ,'. : % ". : "' ••:ove...:.::::::■:•:::::::::::::::%•::::::4•$%:, t. •:+•,•,:,:41:..--,...-.: „-,., .,, . . .. i,, _ 7,,,., ;,,:,,.. '........74,t. '41',..,:•.::.7.:',7...t",..,..* ', !'?..:23:51:.::::::::k:*:":".....***:Xti:J::, 1 ',', i ...„.1.:„,:i.),..:, :i„..•. ..........1 . . ,.. .,,. ;, „,..i._, .;';.1-:::..."="..:;.^.,;•E'r;771 .7,...."t.' ''''''''*%.*'"*"..:-..::: :11:gl$M$.0$ . .• ;?..:-.%'!:':7g::.'1 ,',7:. :... ' * • : 7,,,,., '..,,..,i1 4,1;747.-•:-...,1.4.r:':;.,,.4-4- .t• , :',.......: .-,,,,,f,,,..?:•:,,:•...X.X.::,,.....-.>.'-.0-:.:•:•:•........•....• • 4.....:......a.:;i:::.:7:. r,'...:,....0"." ''..;;,.:...'.. '..,, '",:.'`:+7.:"..P,,,,,...,VoNr...*:•:V....V....V.:;,...,,w,,,,,,. /„. , , ....,..,,,, 4,f-,■,‘„,„, „......, , ,. •, .1,,.,...i ., .,., '''''''"''''''''"'-:''''''''''*:*.*i' '''.• ' * -''..''''''''..-''•'.'4,',''''.:*.,'r....>):.:'•:•:.•.; : ..:,:.....:.' „..' • ' .. ...,:-..' 't!....'.. . -.-.. , , • . .,, ,,,1"i;:.7%:•.Tria:::::,:a.:4.:.:',7":'"".7f",.;.11.,''''',:7:•. , ,,. , ,',..7, ...:+:4:1•:.::::,,, v , ., ,, ..7Z..e'' l!:: :::7:■..1■;:■' -..:,'; -`.^..„ -3"7.:,.;`2,;'4-V-i;.:;•7,774V,",b,,MVE:::::.... .., ......... '.. ...;::-,:t."„...';:::T.,•1',■,,,•„i . . ..' ", ,,.,:_,:., ',..'''''.1•7;'''',4n,":' 4:"...'1:Z,Z1,.':: ••..'.• , . i:':•:.i,-,' !;L:.'.';',...f..7..1,L..:•':-,', W.'.•:•:•Zre:4".:44'.V.". -N.-'• . -t•^" :'. .:' . .• ;.•.±:!,:::,,,X:.:..::.: W.• •`._&K. -: :. ', ' 7,-4. • . - . • ..- :-... i'.'411,fL.V.::::.1::::!..i i.-;;V::,.,.4-1.:./7' ", , I',,,,.:',-,,1;:. ...,:';-:';2;0*,,.1.-i',.LL4.,;:-S1.),',1.".:*?./5.1V;=,,..".....%•,,,KVC • •.'t, ''';'.•; Y:"::.?...'4.,74.:.::.■•••.,.''....-". . ' '.:',':'.::,.?,n -'''‘'.,:,..,,, ,'.".-"*.! . .,;-. :,It'.,:;--:;'•:;',..'':::'-', .'''41 . . ,.-•,,• *IR, •r...,*C.f.,';';';;;;,, ,.'..'",li..:::';:..':- :.• • ,:2.4:1'!:.r.'"'. .,:.:."-.:._, ,i,-;"....;,7*--A-,.-., :44''',:‘,;.12;i:f":1, 5'',1;;;;yi,.;.$:,: ,,,,:::::2'....., .:„.,%,. . ;;;',.:4;•:5.Ii-i...'":;'.." '''1'..: ::.''''.;>,:::'3'..f'''.:7-;:j.;7,;':::'.1,..';',y7;,:,„ .41:4111k41. ,;:,.`,:ir'.. ...+,4.,..,- ::^+••.;,;,.4,',`,.....:. ..; . , - ,=■:.:-;'.•%:;;,!:,4,-!;.',I':.. .":Y4,.,.:F:...;.:;. .....v,••■•' ,...,.., ... . 7:: .1".j "I 1 „:;:f..; 1:Z!;::.... 4..t.,., •, . HARMON YOUNG AREA STUDY I Proposed Land Use Plan LEGEND: URBAN PUBLIC INTEREST AREA 4....-.43 ..:. 1 COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL F----------) TOWN PLANNING AREA EMI , TRANSITION NODE 1 TEN YEAR TRANSITION Urn 11111 0 PROPOSED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS glEV TWENTY YEAR TRANSITION 111111111111 PROPOSED ROAD i 1 i RURAL RESIDENTIAL Scale Oirl . , , II "Ippr 0 1000 2000 3000 I AUGUST tgAtg { 11. + , ,p, APPENDIX A ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT wr.-risBOROTTGH NORTH CAROLINA 2727$ _■ FOR THE HARMON YOUNG AREA STUDY DATE EVENT June 16, 1983 Hillsborough Township Advisory Council - Preliminary Review June 20, 1983 Planning Board - Preliminary Review June 30, 1983 #1 Public Meeting Information and Community Survey of Area Concerns/Problems July 5, 1983 Board of County Commissioners - Preliminary Review July 7, 1983 #2 Public Meeting - Results of Survey and Review of Proposed Goals and Objectives July 12, 1983 Hillsborough/Eno Township Advisory Councils - Review of Survey Results - Review of Plan Alternatives and Proposed Goals and Objectives July 14, 1983 #3 Public Meeting - Review of Plan Alternatives July 18, 1983 Planning Board - Review of Survey Results and Proposed Goals and Objectives - Review of Plan Alternatives July 28, 1983 (cancelled) Hillsborough/Eno Township Advisory Councils - Review of Draft Area Plan August 2, 1983 (rescheduled) Hillsborough/Eno Township Advisory Councils - Review of Draft Area Plan i ° te DATE EVENT August 4, 1983 #4 Public Meeting -Review of Draft Area Plan / Agusut 15, 1983 Planning Board -Review of Draft Area Plan August 17, 1983 (cancelled) Hillsborough/Eno Township Advisory Councils -Review of Proposed Area Plan August 22, 1983 ' Public Hearing -Proposed Harmon 'bung Area Plan September 8, l983| Hillsborough/Eno Township Advisory Council -Recommendation on Proposed Area Plan September 19, 198 Planning Board -Recommendation on Proposed Area Plan October 3, 1983 Board of County Commissioners -Plan Approval *Meetings will be scheduled with the Town of Hillsborough to review the Plan. # of Respondents (42) COMMUNITY PROBLEM CHECKLIST Below is a list of potential land use problems in you community. -Please indicate by placing a check in the appropriate column whether you feel the item is a MAJOR or MINOR PROBLEM, NOT A PROBLEM, or if you DO NOT KNOW. Please add specific comments on all or any item if you feel strongly about it. Once you have completed the checklist, please answer the additional questions. ------__-___ __—=_POTf?'L AAL PROBLEM-_ MAJOR MINOR NOT A COMMENTS - -----PROBLEM .P-ROBLEM----PROB.LEM- _(SEE_ ATTACHMENT) I . 1. too much residentiai development I 10 7 20 5 NA'* • i '' 2 too little residential development - ( 5 30 • 6 NA 3. uncontrolled residential development 20 i I 4 11 6 NA 4. too much commercial development 8 8 21 4 NA 5. too little commercial development 3 5 1 28 6 NA 6. ' inappr=opriate .location cf commercial 19 8 15 .5 NA development ' 7. too much industrial development 5 6 24. . 5 NA 8. too little industrial development 5 1 6 1 19 7 NA . • 9. inappropriate location of industry i E 7' 7 19 6 NA 10. conflict between residential areas and - 15 7 15 5 NA other uses • 11 . loss of agricultural land 11 9 15 6 NA 12. conflict between farming activities and 7 10 - 15 ! .. 8 NA other uses . • 13. lack of recreation space/facilities l I9 5 13 t 4 NA 14. inadequate roads 23 3 13 2 NA 15. traffic 16 13 9 3 NA 16. ' road litter 16 14 7 4 NA 17. too many road signs 2: 8 1 26 5 NA *nrA (No Answer) - Includes "DO Not Know" Responses I ` POTENTIAL PROBLEM ' MAJOR MINOR NOT A COMMENTS PROBLEM PROBLEM PROBLEM ■ 18. soil 'erosion 20 8 9 4 NA 19. t,nadequate :sewage treatement 11 13 7 10 NA ---- -- -------20-.--ava-i-i-ab-i-l-Lty-of-dr-inking--water--supply----_--_- —_ -2 — -6-- — -22----�- -- -1�-NA — — — 21 . pollution of Water supply • 6 7 j 19 9 NA 22. local flooding 10 8 16 7 NA 23. availability of good jobs 18 10 9 4 NA 24, distance of jobs from home 17 7 10 5 NA 25. avallabillty of.affordable housing 13 6 16 6 NA 26. quality of housing 14 7 14 6 NA 27. level of police protectiOn . 15 10 10 6 NA 28. level of fire protection 13 10 12 6 NA 29. availability of green boxes for garbage • 25 9 4 1 NA 30. location of schools 9 1 11 12 8 NA CAN YOU THINK OF OTHER PROBLEMS YOU OR YOUR COMMUNITY AREI,CONCERNED ABOUT? o inadequate drainage o fire hydrants needed o need for tighter zoning o open dump o type and amount of new development o need school bus routes on subdivisdioi o dogs running loose o improper use of green boxes- o junk cars roa s o crime rate hike o no need for more industry or airport o over-commercialization 26 NA o redistricting school systems due to population influx List the three (3) Items by number which you think are the worst problems in your community? 1) 14 (21) 2) 27 (7) 3) 16 (7) 4) 29 (6) 5) 13,15,28 (5) 6) 3,6,23 (4) 7) 4,18, 26 (3) 7) 1,11,19,25,30 •(2) 8) 8,10,17,20,22 (1) OTHER: overcrowding, noise, lack of services, high taxes, poor budgeting List the three (3) things you like best about your community? 1) neighbors/people 2) location/proximity to towns, schools, services, shopping, hospitals 3) rural atmosphere OTHERS: climate :low density ■• '_+ " . ePAGE•3 • . PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ABOUT YOURSELF: , , Hillsborough (19) chapel Hill (1) Cheeks (1) What township do you live in? Eno (8) , Bingham (1) Burlington (1) NA(11) Do.you live inside the city limits oftillisborough? 3 yes 39 no — • ••• Do you live within the extraterritorial planning jurisdiction of Hillsborough? 27 yes 1..1 no 14-NA Why did you move to hism 6 born he re job r71tel aetW. ria 2 tr 2 NA oe rt. a ttracte dttrco un4iatily liuiorrhousii altnIA What --t-iiii-e-iif-hilitg--(16-Sirciu-11V-a-ITI?-- ii------singte-f-aml-ly----house-in-subdri-v-i-S-ion—_____ .__not_i_n_s_ub_clisi3i on___..._ 0 duplex 0 apartment 1./ mobile home on lot 2 mobile home in park 2 NA Do you 36 own or 2 rent your home? 2 NA Do you think yourihome. is located in an 12 urban or a 22 rural area? OTHER: suburbanindttsmy7- Durham L13 Wake-,1-: Retired- Do you work In Orange County? 14 yes 22 no If other county please name Alamance - 2 NA - 3 How many miles do you travel one way to wonk? 3 0-1 miles 4 1 . 1 -5 miles 5 5. 1-10 12 10. 1-15 miles 6 15. 1725 miles 3 25+ miles 8-NA Dur)am-18 Where do you regularly shop for the following? Hills-26 groceries Durkin-1/4 clothing Durham-28 5UFEEFE721 Hills-4 furniture/appliances Hi11s-22 banking . , pgflIT:35 medical services OTHER: Chapel Hill, Burlington, Raleigh, Roxboro Do you live within the Harmon Young Study Area? 23 yes 12 no Do you live near the Harmon Young Study Area? 22 yes 8 no NA-1J Name (OPTIONAL) . . , . , . . , -, COMMENTS QUESTION INDIVIDUAL COMMENTS 1. mobile home and low income housing destroys beauty of area too much multifamily and trailers 2. because of truck stop and not following rules prime ard, needs more development roads only 3. too controlled for mobile homes; does not allow freedom of choice 4. too little commercial development too much development placed in Boone Square definitely not a problem 5. we need more stores like Food Lion on this side of Town need more 6. inadequate shopping facilities need extra turning lane or caution //gill at truck stop disorganized commercial development serves only small section do not like mobile home sales on major roads . , 7. need regulations to protect residential areas and need proper balance for tax base tax base • LUMM.C.Nlb QUESTION INDIVIDUAL COMMENTS 8. need regulations to protect residential areas and need proper balance fdr tax base tax base 9. need regulations to protect residential areas and need proper balance for tax base need more jobs for community do not r.levaluate residential property concerned about possibility 10. 11. too much agricultural land being turned into residences 12. area is becomming subUrban and (it) should be prepared for 13. kids have no place to play except streE and Orange Recreation Department 14. need more/better roads Joppa Oaks roads are terrible need 4 lanes need paved road highway 86 cannot adequately accomodati a high density of traffic 15. can only get worse uncontrolled congestion in Daniel Boon area accidents will occur slow moving tractor trailers bad in downtown during peak hours will be handled as growth occurs along highway areas COMMENTS QUESTION INDIVIDUAL COMMENTS 16. much filth and garbage thrown beside redid along #10, highway 86 south and Colonial Hills subdivision dumping along roadways 17. 18. fidsuse/careless development of land need to make developers and homeowners responsible drainage bad in some spots improper clearing of land (concern with previous developer actiol 19. will become major as area develops too many in houses for size of tank (concern with previous developer actio, 20. will become major as area develops could become major problem if no plan (concern with previous developer actio low water pressure at times 21. will become major as area develops 22. will become major as area develops 23. downtown not adequately prepared for even minor flooding 24. 11 miles have to drive to RTP 3-40 miles 25. land too restricted for mobile homes COMMENTS QUESTION INDIVIDUAL COMMENTS 26. houses thrown together and not built by code 27. inadequate as different laws apply to different areas not enough law enforcement; takes too 1( takes too long 28_ totally inadequate takes too long Eno Fire department excellent need fire hydrant need more localized stations 29. all areas should have garbage pickup, not green boxes inadequate in number, poorly designed, disgrace growing community should have direct garbage pickup no such service need additional locations very much needed with appropriate placement and screening very few boxes available for rural residents 30. too large an area to cover could be a problem if the area continues to grow and develop residentially there should be no busing, the schools . , may be racially balanced; however the classrooms are not kids are bused too far RE: #4,6,7,9,10, and 16 - Our community, Strayhorn Hills, is a lovely, quiet, residential area. The apparently unplannedl, and certainly undesirable, commercially developing area a disturbingly short distance from this community, on State Road No. 10, between Strayhorn Hills and Highway 86, is a growing concern to us. . With alarming frequency during the six years we have lived in Strayhorn Hills, may husband I have watched commercial development of a most unattractive kind increase in thi. area. With this development has sDeeoing traffic- in our subdivision from non-residents, this on the streets of our subdivision, and an increase in incidences of break-ins to the homes here. Our concern and fear is that this sprawl of unwanted development, which we would like to see gone althogether, will grow. • TRIANGLE J COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS 100 PARK DRIVE O. BOX 12276 RESEARC11 TRIANGLE PARK.N.C. 27709 (g19)549.055i FALLS/JORDAN RECLASSIFICATION HEARING August 9. 1983 _____________ Statement by Mr. Richard Whitted - Chairman, Triangle J Council of Governments . • Good evening. My name is Richard Whitted. I 'm Chairman of the Triangle J Council 4f Governments, and also chair the Orange County Board of Commissioners. I 'm speaking tonight on behalf of the Council of Government . 4 The statement I 'm presenting tonight was developed by Triangle J 's Water ResoUrces Advisory Committee. That Committee is a broad- based group of representatives of local governments plus technical advisors from Soil and Water Conservation Districts, special interest groups, an'fl university research. • This statement has also been endorsed by the Executive Committee of Triangle J. This statement does not, however , represent - nor is it intended to represent - the the and positions of all member governments of Triangle J on the critical questions that are the subject of this public hearing. • Water quality and water supply_ have been top priorities of our membershipifor over 15 years. • In 1974 the COG became the first agency in the United States to receive a water quality planning grant under Section 208 of the Federal Clean Water Act . • In 1981 Trliangle J conducted Project 2000 - a region-wide look at the future of this area. This past Spring our Horizons UNlimited Forum brought together public officials, private developers, and other citizens Concerned about the rapid growth and development of the Triangle area. The conclusions were inescapable; water quality and waterisupply will become even more important factors in maintaining the livability and marketability of the Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill region. 1 • Where are! we now? We're all at the crossroads of planning and action. Do we continue to talk, and plan, and study water quality? Or do we start something about it? • The time to protect Falls and Jordan Lakes is now. Not next year; not the year after next but right now. (Over) APEX • BENSON • BROADWAY • CARRIIORO • CARY • CII APIA_ IIILL CLAYTON • DURHAM • FOUR OAKS • FUQUAY VARNA • GARNER GOLDSTON • III asKpRoucli • HOLLY SPRINGS • KENI Y • KNIGII I DAI L MICRO • MORRISVILLE • PINE LEVEL • PI 1-1SBOHO • MIN(I ION RALEIGH • ROLESVILLE • SANFORI) • SFEMA • 511.1 It CFI Y SMITHFIELD • 'I WAKE FORESE • WENDEL 1. • ZIPVLON CHATHAM COUNTY I • DURHAM COUNTY • JOHNSTON MINI Y LEE COUNTY ORANGE COUNTY • WAKE OUN I -2- • Some of us Ideny that the lakes face any water quality problems. Some of us say, 1"The fish are healthy. The algae are healthy. The public is healthy; and the public is happy." 1 • Some of us say, "There's no problem, because there's no smoking gun." • We may not have a smoking gun yet; but we have a loaded gun, and it's readylto go off. • Statisticsifrom NRCD indicate that Falls and Jordan are already overloaded with nutrients that will cause nuisance algae blooms in the future. These lake receive the runoff and effluent from one of the most prosperousland rapidly growing areas of the Southeast. That growth will mean even more pollution than we have right now. • We must make every effort to disarm that loaded gun - one chamber at a time, ! if necessary. Painful as it may be, we have to make the tough decisions, and start solving our problems today: 1 • We must put together a careful and deliberate plan of action that guaranteesithe long-term protection of both lakes. Certain actions are neededlnow, others will be needed in 3, 6, or maybe 12 months. But each one should be part of a carefully planned network of state, local , andIprivate sector actions. And each one must be based on cost, equity, and effectiveness. • Triangle J supports NRCD's proposal to upgrade certain Class C waters of Falls and Jordan to A-11 or B. We consider A-II as a water quality goal - and not an endorsement of Jordan Lake's present condition. • We support the designation of both watersheds as Nutrient Sensitive; but, we urge the EMC to be fair and deliberate in assigning phosphorus removal requirements to wastewater dischargers. • We support the phosphorus strategy proposed for Jordan Lake, except that the Haw River and New Hope arms should be treated in the same way. Dischargers to the Haw River Arm should be subject to the same phosphorus' requirements that NRCD is recommending for the New Hope. 1 • We supportIthe phosphorus strategy proposed for Falls Lake. 1 1 • All new dischargers in both Falls and Jordan watersheds should be subject to stringent phosphorus removal requirements, and should be encouraged to use non-discharging wastewater systems. • We may not1 be able to eliminate all the existing pollution sources, but we can! certainly try to limit any new ones. • Even with these added control measures, Triangle J is not convinced that the EMC's classification system will really assure the long-term quality of1 Falls and Jordan Lakes. -3- • When it conies right down to it, we're much more concerned about drinking waterguality than algae and nutrients. • The EMC must not lose sight of the serious - and still unanswered - , public concerns about long-term health effects of synthetic organic chemicals and trace metals which may be present in these lakes. • The existing classification system does not prevent the gradual deterioration of A-II waters. • All A- II waters are not of equal quality . The Cape Fear River near Wilmingtonlis not of the same high qualiti as NASA' s Cane Creek or Durham 's LItcle River sites - even though they all satisfy A-II standards . • Runoff from new development and effluent from new wastewater plants in the Falls and Jordan watersheds will inevitably degrade these water supply sources, even though present A-II standards may be met. • We need a new and better approach. • We need a-level of protection somewhere in between the existing A-I and A- II categories. • We therefore encourage the EMC to create a new "Enhanced Protection" designation for certain stream segments or sub-basins of large reservoirs. • Cities and ;counties can and will take more aggressive steps against nonpoint p4Ilution through local zoning ordinances, subdivision regulatiorI, and utility extension policies. However, the EMC must work cooperatively with local governments, and not subvert these local efforts bylissuing discharge permits in critical watersheds. • We face a range of serious water quality issues. Please keep that full range in mind. • We applaud the EMC's vigorous efforts to get out in front of those problems. • We at Triangle J need your continuing help and leadership. • We offer our own. . , Triangle J Council of Governments Water Resources Advisory Cornmitte - August 17, 1983 POSSIBLE FALLS/JORDAN MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Recommendati9ns apply to both watersheds unless denoted by an F (Falls) or a J (Jordan) . Agricultural Runoff • identify and treat "Critical Erosion Areas" in both watersheds. (F) • tmpleiment a 10-year agricultural conservation program as detailed in the Upper Neuse River Basin Erosion Study (USA-SCS) • (F) • AgresSively seek $12.3 million needed for the 10-year Falls project; supplement federal sources with State and county funding, as needed. (J) • Fund and implement a similar long-term program for the Jordan watershed, as recommended in the USDA-SCS Upper Cape Fear Erosion Studyl (not yet completed) . Urban Runoff; - Existina Areas • Adopt and enforce local sedimentation and erosion control ordinances for construction activities in Durham (City and County) , Chatham County, Alamance County, Burlington, and Graham. • Reduce the sediment and phosphorus loads in urban streams by correcting the leaks in city sewer systems (pending the cost- benefiit analysis of Durham's pilot study) . • Stormwater runoff from existing urban areas is a major source of phOsphorus in the watershed, but there are few practical methods for reducing the problem. Local S&E programs will reduce the sediment load from construction activities in the DurhaM and Burlington-Graham areas. Urban Runoff! - New DeveIo.ment 1 • Adopt impervious surface limits and undisturbed area requirements for new development in both watersheds. • Require the onsite infiltration of the first half-inch of runoff from all impervious surfaces. • Encourage large lot sizes (two acres or more) and/or clustered develbpment, especially in areas nearest to the lakes. (Over) 5 -2- • Wastewater Treatment • Designate both watersheds "Nutrient Sensitive Waters." (F) • Put existing dischargers on notice that phosphorus removal may be required in the future, pending results of Falls Lake monitoring data and the General Assembly's Neuse River Basin StudyJ, (J) • Requite all existing dischargers in the Jordan Watershed to install equipment needed for phosphorus removal . Do not require actual removal until the benefits are more clearly understood or nuisance algae problems occur. • For new wastewater dischargers in both watersheds, impose phosphorus removal requirements of at least 80 percent. • Enactla phosphate detergent ban throughout both watersheds. Seek State legislation, if necessary. • Strictly enforce local industrial pretreatment and sewer use ordinances to prevent the release of toxic chemicals from sewage treatment plants. • Require private developers or homeowner's associations to establish escrow funds adequate to ensure the proper long-term operaition of their wastewater systems. • Count1y or city governments should monitor and inspect the operation and maintenance of all private community wastewater systalms. Hazardous Materials Spills • Devellop a coordinated response plan for hazardous materials spills from highway crossings over both lakes. • Consider asking DOT to prohibit the use of certain roads by vehiCles transporting hazardous materials across the lakes. • Augment - as needed - emergency response capabilities of local communities in the watersheds. Equity Sharing • i ! Establish a funding process through which the direct beneficiaries of clean water contribute to the cleanup and protection costs imposed on upstream pollution generators who receive no direct benefits from Falls and Jordan Lakes. - fr FALLS WATERSHED MANAGEMENT: PROPOSED WATER QUALITY GOALS NUTR ENTS: 35 micrograms per liter, chlorophyll A SEDIMENTATION: 5 tons/acre/year (rural ) local erosion control ordinances (developing) STORMWATER RUNOFF : Post development no greater than pre-development FALLS LAKE WATERSHED CURRENT PHOSPHORUS SOURCES 172 � '--- -kg/yr AERICULTURE Si 1'i Of this 31% � ibu�e� 24% Orange Co . oon � 4:11:11,1,:it;trilr444:1411;iiiel+Nriyi*,:titr ii. P�raon �V . oon�r1butaa 22% t 2ly teo 19% ' Durbmm Cp , oontrnbtuinbu 12% Wake Co. oontrtbut�a �rao�lin Cu . contributes 2% ^^-``-- ' PTS �7�{ ���C ' '` .~'. `�. ~ . DT R . PRECTP Of this 45 . � -' 2% 72% Durham City contribu tes 21% �u�or contributes Hillsborough �ontributex 6% URBAN_ 1 SX Of this 15% /'_-_-_---'_-'-----_-----_-__ _'-___'----_-__�-__---____--_-__-- _-_--- ___--_- -_--_' ---- _ -- __'__ 42%i WDua ornibtruitbeustes 17@ iabe �o . c�oot I ��ideotial coo t 1BuraHIIborou~h contributes U contributes 18* ' NRCD , DEM : JuIy ' l983 . A ' � . _ FALLS LAKE WATERSHED FUTURE PHOSPHORUS SOURCES 222,000 kg/yr OLD HUN PTS aSX NEW HUN PTS 183i 1111.e!!! !.7 ill! URBAN (NEW) �1 • 4N URBAN (OLD) 'i AGRICULTURE 24K JORDAN WATERSHED MANAGEMENT: PROPOSED WATER QUALITY GOALS NUTRIENTS: 35 micrograms per liter, chlorophyll A SEDIMENTATION: 5 tons/acre/year (rural) local erosion control ordinances (developing) STORNWATER RUNOFF: Post development no greater than pre-development , JORDAN HAW RIVER WATERSHED PHOSPHORUS SOURCES 517T000 kg/yr A©RXCULT11hE: �,. 24K fili 4f:,i�'.ail*!"+i°O,. i!i6401,44i4i6.};}1. 4160%c16%.4.6..4. O Of this 24% Sr.∎;.•a∎.,1sf#efrstrfI. 1614 ,f*�},y 0+r, '►liil��!'ri" -r�''r!*}�i 3►'�a0-is*f�a�/�a}r�i Alarnanci Co . contributes 38% a, ,�}r1�a f r�j! r s 4*a �a*a!Tf'r 6.6.��. o 14 6740 ee'e• ioir .0t-10"`iti i I'OPV4 pa;} Guilford Co .' contributes 36% i'tr}*}4aa ti'}i it 6164}11"}1,a+31 64.. $0} •.s,•, Chatham Co . contributes 7% itt.4 of ,from jiit`}��1016. ,a00../1110$04010.406'1$6,11-410. �i yr�r6$64!4 -4 rf.shotr yr} a-a0 as a i •a}yr}. 1.0�,r}.r.:%•;..a}T,4 }44 •4.1. .7;:41 - RECIP iik: +fita a 'i;941 06$114$4,:+'�+ii�i•160. �MVM. C. - V if " ,� `�-•.•.4?...••'' f !1! sss•••• t.f..• .. ► r * i + -, *Nti ;•• FOREST/WET io'4:o6. r ,. ,, . N...*aft /« ;`•01.0-it• .66$16 00.1,�i,':.`t0 eV*•. ao 4} *,''iii!0.....x.-,40 !j1.410 yip Of this 58� .,far*ktosvotoit. }..0asa! 1 4i,! ��4_,6 4.6;}1,l�+pa} '+"any 0446+r`,:0;}ti Greensboro contributes 51% j URBAN Burlington contributes 31% 13X Others 18% Of this 13% Greensboro contributes 63% Burlington contributes 22% Others 15% N17CD , DEM: July, 1983 • r JORDAN t NEW HOPE WATERSHED PHOSPHORUS SOURCES 117.000 kg/yr -ref r•.•,},, II,fAt- AGRICULTURE 'le 40011 a r,,••,:..-.4.•f ti'•41'a e',ef•:t,`,*}f `.14P;,, Of This 1 s�o •,CI00'0f..i00,.ti}•41'01i`t.,•.}-},,■ 40 1 141 41*'110,.y}..tr}1•s,.+'�*�` •}t }'}!�}'tl}ff it• 0.04.fi'}rli *•ftiole,s 1,0k!;0Vi/�it.0f0.00�*` MUNIC. PTS *, . Orange Co. contributes 42% F..4.0-..4.0.04,00,if�„tiv .,--/�f1}f.0-0,f.}• Chatham Co . contributes 04K 41,, 1.,.. ..,4*,,r ,}.r.• - ,. , 28% �r.410. ,}••.•},.}f•►..441}.�.��f-, r}�a•}}wtt+*f1t.f+�1 ��„}4'0./.1*�':.#.40:0∎,11:.1�!►fige 41.0-A..} Durham Co . Contributes 16%•'1.4'41,. }, ;,;