Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 05-23-1983 F./ | , " | ' ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REGULAR MEETING 7:30 P.M. MONDAY MAY 23, 1983 SUPERIOR COURTROOM ORANGE COUNTY COURTHOUSE HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA A. BOARD COMM6TS B. AUDIENCE COMMENTS 1. Matters 0n the printed agenda 2. MatterS |not on the printed agenda C. MINUTES i MAY 16, 1983 D. JOINT* PUBLIO HEARING WITH THE ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD 1. Special Use Permit Modification Request From Midway Airport Developers 2. Proposed Private Road Standards 3, Proposed Text Changes to the Subdivision Regulations 4. Proposed Text Changes to the Zoning Ordinance E. BOARD DECIS NS 1. Farmland Preservation Program 2. Watershed Protection Measures 3. The Timbers Extension Request 4. Request for Special Public Hearing 5. Tax Inte 8st Release Request 6. Housing Rehabs 7. Vehicle Replacement Request � . � TABLE OF CONTENTS \ MAY 23, 1983 _ �TEM & TUPIC __� ~________________���______PAGES � � ABSTRACT� _ - D. PUBLIC HEARING -O44 UI 1. Midway Airport SP. US. Perm, O01=UO2 001-044 045-060 O4� 2, Private Rd. Standards 045 _ - - 3. Subdiv. Regs, Changes 001 U61--- O�4 4, Zoning Ordinance Changes 062 062-064 1 ' E. BOARD DECISIONS 1. Farmland Preservation 065 055 O�� O94 ' � ' , 066 0 _ 2. W����r�hed' Pr0- t��t1On . - ' - 3. The Timbers Extension _ 095 095-096 ~ '^-' 4. S- ia] Pub, Hearing Request 097 097 -098 098 099 103 - --� — O9�L - 5. T��x. Int. Repq. . -l07 - 104 IO4 6. � j ^ .� �b� � ^- ' ' 7. Vehicle Replacement 108 108-110 4 la 1 MINUTES ORANGE COUNTY BOARD Or ComMIaozomoa May 23, 1983 The Orange County Board of Commissioners met in regular session on sooday. May 23, 1983, at 7:30 P.M. in the Superior Courtroom, Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina. Commissioners Present: Richard E. Wbitted, Chair, and Commissioners Ben Lloyd, Shirley Marshall, Norman Walker and Don niIlbnit. Commissioner Whitted announced that this was a Joint Public Hearing with the Orange County Planning Board, stating that the Chair of the Planning Board, Logan Irvin would conduct the Public Hearing as usual. Planning Board Members Present: Logan Irvin, David Shanklin, John Kizer, George Frank Pearson, m Allison,n Nancy Laszlo, Tom Bacon, Sharlene Pilkey, Alice Gordon, and Carl Walters. Planning Board Member Absent: John Wilson m-1 8pecia1_-_D��__J8:z�i±-_'0»�i����� o� Reaugot lcpocl Developers Rick Cannity made the presentation (see pages of this book) He noted the location and description of the proposed Midway Airport; that there are two major alternative methods that local government may employ to regulate general aviation airports - airport zoning or special use permits. In applying zoning to areas around a proposed airport, local government attempts to control the types of land use that develop around the facility and especially within the approach surfaces of the runways. The ordinances usually control the height of objects that may be constructed or grown within the approach surface. Zoning to control land use and heights of objects is usually applied in conjunction with public airports. These facilities are ones which �P� j -- aze constructed by a governmental agency with some level of federal funding through the F.A.A. The agnuoy charged with construction of the airport, because it is public in nature and can be expected to respond to the general public's concerns, usually has the cooperation of the local government in setting the land use districts within the approach surfaces of the airEwct, The other common method of local governmental control of general aviation airports is through the granting of special use gezmits, Some of the advantages seen by the Planning Staff in treating airports as a special use are: 1. It appeared that Orange County was not in a positno to participate financially in a public airport. 2. The County did not plan to restrict the development potential of property owners adjacent to any proposed private airport. 3. Therefore, the construction of a general aviation airport would be a private venture for the direct profit of th e developers. It would be the responsibility of the developers to meet the requirements for a special use permit and any imposed conditions applied at approval. Mr. Cannity stated that one of the important distinctions in the discussion of Midway Airport is the difference between a pubic and private airport. The FAA does not require private or public airports to meet the standards they have developed, however Orange County has chosen to require that developers of such airport facilities meet FAA standards. On September 7, 1982, the Orange County Board of Commissioners found that Buck Mountain Development had met the minimum requirements for the issuance of a Class A Special Use eecmit, However the Board also felt that several g 2 additional conditions should be imposed in the approval to assure that the development would protect the public health, safety and general welfare. One of the conditions was that the applicant shall own or control the heights of objects in the area at each end of the runway which is known as the approach-departure zone. The approach-departure zone begins 200 feet from the end of the runway and rises at a 30:1 slope to a height of 350 feet at a distance of 5000 feet. The zone is 5000 feet in width at its beginning and 3000 feet in width at its end. The easement rights negotiated with each property owner must specify that the developer can control the heights of objects within the approach-departure zone. All easement agreements and other evidence of ownership of the approach-departure zone shall be in form and content approved by the County Attorney. In addition to not being able to quantify the amount of motor vehicle traffic associated with the related uses proposed for the airport, the requirements to remove the limit on flight training could also substantially increase the amount of traffic on Highway 54. The 50w limit on flight training was intended to minimize the amount of noise created by airplanes making practice runs at the airport. The last condition the developers would like to have deleted concerns the fire truck access required to the property from Teer Road. The Orange Grove Fire Department asked that the road be required so that the response time to a fire alarm might be reduced. In conclusion, Mr. Cannity noted that the Planning Staff feels that the conditions as they exist have not changed and therefore Staff does not feel it is neceasacy to modify, amend or delete any of the conditions imposed on the approval of the special use permit. John Kizer, Planning Board Member, asked if the approach-departure zone should be a 34:1 slope or 20:1 slope7 Be added that aroce Matthews of the North Carolina Department of Transportation, Divison of Aviation recommends a 20:1 slope. Rick Cannity stated the Planning Staff needed to check the FAA Standards regarding the 34:1 slope mentioned in Harold Robinson's letter dated March 5, 1982, that the Planning Staff used nationally developed standards in determining traffic to the airport and also information from Bruce Mattbews, John Northen, Attorney for the developers, stated that the runway could be shortened by shifting it. He stated that the affected landowners had been contacted for discussion of the rights-of-way needed to construct the airport. He noted that the FAA requirements have been met and the County has the power to impose height restrictions through the Airport dimtziot, He further stated they have studied the possibility of fire access road(s) by comparing the original airport proposal to the current airport proposal. Alice Gordon, Planning Board Member, asked if easements were required for approach-departure zones? Could developers "get it" (obtain the easements) and what efforts have been made to obtain the easements? John Northen responded, saying letters were sent to each property owner along with a copy of the diagram of affected property asking the landowners to contact him to discuss the rights-of-way needed. Alice Gordon asked if the letters contained a specific amount of money for the rights-of-way? Did they offer any financial consideration? John Northen answered, landowners were asked to get in touch, but the developers had received negative responses. Alice Gordon asked Mr. Northen what the developers were prepared to pay? 3 Alice Gordon asked Mr. Northen if the developers would be willing to use Horace Williams Airport as a guide for their uses? John Northen responded, saying they do not have that information. Out of the uses listed, those listed first are clearly accessory. Alice Gordon asked if they would be small buildings? John Northen responded, they would be enclosed in the baugaca, Alice Gordon: What is the total square footage of the structures? Commissioner Willbvit asked where would they be located? John Northen: On the map, FBO and maintenance hangars. Commissioner Willbnit asked if the structures were in the third phase? He added, normally there is an indication of the structure for that use. John Northen: It will be developed as needed by phase for operation of the airport closest to Highway 54 first. Alice Gordon: Would you be able to tell which uses, which phase, and what footage for use? John Northen: Could do it and submit it - but not off the top of his head. Alice Gordon asked Marvin Collins, Planning Director, if there was any information from the Horace Williams Airport? Marvin Collins: Rick Cannity contacted the Horace Williams Airport regarding the proposed uses and that most of the uses proposed correspond with those at Horace Williams. Alice Gordon indicated she had reviewed accessory uses located at the Horace Williams facility and noted there was a combined pilot ready room/lounge, Carolina Flying Service, maintenance area, vending machine toilets d training acea concession area, ao area. There were no large maintenance areas, radio area, concession or courtesy offioe, John Kizer asked how far are the road entrances from the runway (primary surface) . John Northern responded, approximately 550 feet. John Kizer asked if there will be one office for each tenant? John Northern: Not limited by opace. Logan Irvin, Planning Board Chair, felt that with unlimited number of trainers, there should be some concern about safety. John Northern: They are experienced flyers and will continue to train. Logan Irvin: But inexperienced trainees. John Northen: All pilots wil continue to receive tcaiuing. Logan Irvin asked if inexperienced pilots need safety precautions? John Northen: Yes, designed safely. Logan Irvin: In Harold Robinson's letter dated March 5, 1982,to Jim Polatty, he recommended a 34.1 slope for the approach zone and asked what is the distance from the end of the runway to a pine tree growing at a height of 150 feet within the approach-departure xoue. There followed persistent questioning by or, Irvin about control of natural obstructions in the approach-departure zoue, Northen responded, finally, that the developer had proposed in the submitted modificaton request the area that could be controlled. He added that the FAA and DOT indicated that the proposal met their criteria. John Drake indicated there were long range consequences for the future of airport proposals in Orange County. Representing the citizens for Airport Planning, he read a prepared statement which was contained in the Board of Commissioners' packets. He indicated that the AREC program would not move a ""mh~, of miles from Horace Williams and added that the Planning 418 4 Department had misled the Board of Commissinuecs, He continued that there was no comparable airport with similar restrictions as proposed here and that though listed in the FAA circular, the suggested approach-departure zone was not the accepted practice - that only natural obstructions were limited. With regard to the access road, Drake indicated obtaining the road would only be by luck and if the County thinks it is imgnrtant, then it should be obtained by the exercise of eminent domain. Drake continued that it was reasonable to limit training operations, but unreasonable to set the limit as a total percentage of operations and should be based on the number of operations. He concluded that the danger of accidents at Horace Williams was great. John Kizer asked where oc*ke resided specifically inquiring if he lived in the approach-departure zone. Drake responded he did not live in the zone. ° Julie Andresen, representing concerned Citizens for Airport Planning, clarified that UNC has indicated it would transfer operations if an alternative airport was proposed within reasonable commuting distance and given that the long range planning report for the University says that the University would feel obligated to remove operatins from Horace Williams if an alternative airport was built. She cited the Chancellor's letter regarding removal of operations if a suitable airport was built by 1989, adding that Horace Williams Airport was zoned non-conforming in 1375 and that the schools were located there with the understanding that the airport would soon be closed. She noted that she had full confidence in the Board to keep development away from rural areas. Andresen also expressed concern that actions on this proposal may set a precedent for later airport proposals, continuing that it the County insists on these requirements being met then the County should decide to fund a public airport. Ed Johnson, Chief of the Orange Grove Volunteer Fire Company, reviewed comments made at the February, 1982 public hearing and in the June 24, 1982 letter on the revised airport pcopnsal. Johnson addressed access concerns for fire protection, noting that the Teer Road access would cut the department's response time in balf, He cited his letter of may 11, 1983, which followed a telephone call from Peloquin Associates and a letter from Rick Cannity, noting that he had not received any further information on the access requirement and reserved the right to comment at a later date on changes proDosed' He displayed a map showing possible access roads from the fire station to the site, noting that the Teer Road access would reduce the distance from 4.3 miles to 2.7 miles. He also suggested an alternative route through meadnvoreat development. He explained that the Cane Creek area was all within an insurance rated district and within a one mile tax district and, consequently, had lower rates. He continued that the department was receiving more calls than in 1974, and explained that all areas of the site should be within four road miles of the firehouse for all trucks to respond; otherwise, only one truck can respond and additional help is required from other districts, as determined by the insurance policy. Mr. Johnson then spoke as a private citizen noting the goals and objectives in the adopted Land Use Plan which were proposed and approved by the Bingham Township Adivsory Council and particularly stressing the need to preserve the agricultural and rural character of Bingham Township. He inquired if the minutes of the last public hearing could be included in these proceedings. Commissioner Whitted responded they could not as they were not germane to the proposal. Geoffrey Gledhill: An application for modification incorporates all 415 5 materials previously submitted as evidence and that if it is considered applicable to the discussion it can be considered evidence. Ed Johnson indicated he had consulted a tree book on the average heights of trees common to the area. Although he did not survey actual tree heights around the site, the terrain slopes downward off the southern end and is flat and wooded at the northern end. He displayed a drawing showing the relationship between the height of a tree and the approach departure alope. Given a 100 foot tall tree, Johnson maintained the area out 2000 feet must be controlled for the heights of objects. Johnson cited the letter from tbe maoagoc to Bruce Matthews dated February federal 19, 19G3, stating "objective. . . if public takeover is necessary. . . f fpods for the purpose." He also cited a January 26, 1982 letter from Bruce Matthews regarding requirements in which he advises the more stringent requiremens in case of federal funding or a conversion to instrument approach. He also cited the March 5, 1982 letter from Howard Robinson. Johnson continued, citing a letter from George Warren, FAA Airport District Office, Georgia, dated December 11, 1980, in which Warren indicates that the plan submitted were agreeable but that the comments expire in 1982 if the airport has not been constructed by that time. A letter from Leon Harrison dated November 20, 1980, indicates the determination expires in two years if the airport is not in operation by that time. Johnson asked if these permits had been regranted. Johnson expressed concern about whether Buck Mountain can do what it says it can do and the consequences of achieving or not achieving their objwctive, Johnson discussed the costs of constructing and operating Midway Airport, suggesting that the cost would be o1.5 million spread over the proposed hangars, resulting in the creation of condominium hangars at the cost of v20,000 each. He felt it was appropriate to ask if this was financially viable and what would be the county response to failure of the private operation. Gordon asked if fire services can be provided at an adequate level via NC 54 and if the road miles involved exceed four miles. Ed Johnson: No, the department could send one tanker and call for mutual aid. If Teer Road access can be used it permits the dispatch of more than one piece of equipment and mutual aid as well. Alice Gordon inquired if the request for fire access cannot be granted must the request for modification be denied. Rick Cauvity responded that the Board of Commissioners must decide if the information supplied indicates that adequate fire protection is available. Gordon asked Johnson if the fire access recommended was necessary for the permit to be granted. Johnson replied tht it was a matter of the degree of protection desired and that the Teer Road Access would provide better protection. d � access.Willhoit inquired about the mwa ownr�a ao�w . Jvbusoo indicated it would come off of Teer Road and extend 1/10 of a mile. Commissioner Whitted asked if it was an all weather road. Johnson did not know. Commissioner WiIlboit indicated, based on the evidence, a fire access longer than four miles might not enjoy a lower rating for fire insurance. Ed Johnson indicated tht Horace Williams does not allow touch and go landings for safety and noise reasons and that there also was a risk of accidents with these operations, especially with a shortened runway. Commissioner mllIhnit asked if any additional equipment would be needed if the only fire access was via NC 54. Ed Johnson indicated probably yes, but he 41a 6 onpazmeot had already negotiated with the developer regarding water availability including the provision of two small ponds to be used for water for fire protection. Maurice 8eukela, Orange County resident, expressed opposition to the proposal on economic grounds. He felt that the County residents would end up paying for the airport with tax dollars. Mr. Henkels made his comments as part of a prepared statement, Developers of small airports make money either through the airport itself or from profit from surrounding land which is subsequently developed even after the airport fails and becomes publicly funded. Dan Edelman, County resident, reviewed a display indicating the intrusion of a tree into the 20:1 slope of the approach-departure zooe, He felt the approach-departure zone could be reduced only to a minimum 22-- feet which would allow for a tree height of 110 feet. Edelman also noted that the actual conditions of the site revealed a wall of trees at the north end of the proposed runway in which a tree 65 feet in height intruded into the approach-departure surface for 15 feet. Joseph Suggs, resident of Bingham Township, discussed the alignment of the runway with prevailing windo, Be presented information from the Greensboro airport which indicated a 6.3-9.2 miles per hour NE/SW wind. Be cautioned that the smaller the airplane, the more affected it was by wind, especially ocnasviuds, Suggs displayed a Wind Vector diagram, indicating that the most desirable alignment was 95% with the most wind coverage and the least crosswind compooeut, Suggs inquired if wind velocity and crosswind component had been determined for the site. Stanley Bennett, resident of Chapel Hill Township, felt that the 5008 foot runway at a 20^1 angle was the safest specified angle of approach and that failure of the airport due to economic limitations was very real. Pat Crawford, citizen of Bingham Township, felt a 2000 foot approach- departure slope was preferred and would allow control of naturally growing objects. Crawford indicated that the conditions on the Special Use Permit and the special use permit requirement itself placed the burden of minimizing conflicting land uses on the applicant, rather than on an airport district or the exercise of eminent domain by the County. She referenced documentation which indicated that the approaches were critical areas deserving maximum protection and safety, She noted that the proposal had the potential to be five times larger than Horace Williams based on projected aiccruft, She also felt the County had the duty to reduce inherent conflicts and to not deny the application for modification would be to make a farce of the ordinance. Miriam Murdock, citizen of Bingham Township, expressed her opposition to the proposed airport. Bland Simpson, citizen of Bingham Township, expressed his opposition to the proposed airport in a prepared statement. He also read a letter from Mr. Eric Schopler who could not attend the public hearing. Noel Grady Brown expressed concern regarding traffic conditions along NC 54, Planning Board member Gordon asked what traffic conditions concerned her and Brown cited the traffic coming west from 8lamauoe County. Barbara Page, representative of the Orange County Democratic Party, read a resolution approved by the Party on April 30, 1983, expressing opposition to the modification of the conditions imposed on the Special Use Permit. Ray Kirby, citizen of Bingham Township, asked if runoff controls had been qlJ 7 addressed and expressed concern with the impact on the value of the adjacent lands. Roger Smith asked if the Horace Williams problem justifies removal of the conditions placed on the Midway Airport Special Use Permit and answered his own question with a negative cespuose. John Worthen, Attorney, indicated that the developer would provide information on the proposed accessory uses and the possible fire access through Meadowcrest. Commissioner Ritted indicated that the additional information and evidence would be received at a continuation of the public hearing at a later date. Pat Crawford, Bingham Township resident, asked if the additional evidence would be available for public cnmment, Commissioner Whitted doswezed affirmatively and indicated that the continuation of the public hearing would be on June 27, 1983, Commissioner Lloyd moved, seconded by Commissioner Whitted to approve continuation of the public hearing to June 27, 1983. o-a Imaimsed Private Road Standards Ricky Cannity made the presentation. (see pages of this book) There were no citizen comments. D-3 21zoppxa-Text Cbwageo tm-lbx_autuIimiajan Regulations Ricky Cannity made the presentation. (see pages nf this book) There were no citizen comments. D-4 Ezuzpoosau]_atX±_gbaoges to the Zoning Ordinance Ricky Cannity made the presentation. (see pages _ _ of this book) Planning Board Member Kizer asked if this allowed the possibility of a modification to the Special Use Permit without being subject to a public hearing if passed. Member Kizer felt that the hearing should be continued to obtain public input on these changes. There were no citizen comments. o-1 map DECISIONS - Farmland nrasaersaztioa�bzz�zxuo Logan Irvin, Planning Board Chair, indicated that the Planning Board endorsed the program. He added that the sentence regarding 1-40 should be deleted in #4 of the findings of faot. Commissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit to contract for legislative drafting of the program into a form for legislative submittal. VOTE: Ayes, 3; Noes, 2 (Commissioners Lloyd and Walker) . Commissioner Lloyd indicated that he had two areas of concern with the program: the required sign-up for a ten or a twenty year conservation agreement and the requirement regarding application of SCS approved erosion control practices on critical areas. He noted that he would oppose a program containing these items. E-2 Watersbed_Frntertioo Measures Rick Cannity gave the presention on the implementation of watershed protection measures. Irvin Logan requested that the Board reconsider the minimum lot sizes and direct the Planning Board appropriately as the Planning Board felt that this issue was critical to their consideration of industrial development. He noted that there was quite a variation in opinion on minimum lot size in water supply watersheds among Planning Board Members. Commissioner Willhoit indicated that there was considerable misinformation regarding the application of minimum lot sizes in the County, noting that many erroneously thought or were led to believe that the minimum lot sizes would be A..i.. ~na .",~,c^~ac PP ""r~* �' " , � 8 that stormwater management measures were not practical for small subdivisions and the soil suitability may be self limiting. He added that for some time he has opposed some of the watershed measures and proposed that the Board take no action and recommended that the Planning Board proceed with the existing planning for Cheeks Township with additional attention paid to stormwater management for individual lots. mc. Steeple inquired if this was a public hearing. Commissioner Whitted responded that this was not a public hearing, merely a request from the Planning Board for the Board of Commissioners to reconsider whether or not they would like to direct the Planning Board to consider minimum lot sizes in water supply watersheds again. Commissioner Lloyd felt that the proposed resolution was the most ridiculous thing he has ever seen in his life. He noted that stormwater management measures were impractical and too expeosive, He felt it unnecessary to even consider the two acre minimum lot size and went on to discuss the five acre minimum lot size. He reviewed the location of designated water supply watersheds and existing and proposed reservoir sites in the County, indicating that 'tomorrow' all these sites will be included in the implementation of the water supply watershed requirements for the entire County. Commissioner Lloyd asked Marvin Collins, Planning Director, if anyone could build on a one acre lot in a watersupply watershed. Collins answered yes, if the lot were a "lot of record." Commissioner Lloyd then asked if a house built on a "lot of record" could be rebuilt on the same lot if more than 75% of the structure was destroyed by fire. Coliins answered, no. Discussion then was diverted to perceptions of the ordinance as it affects non-conformities. The Board of Commissioners asked that amendments be drawn to clarify these questions that persist. Attorney Gledhill stated that in his opinion such amendments were unnecessary. Commissioner Lloyd reviewed the minimum lot sizes as they would be required in the Zoning Ordinance and questioned the affordability of lots for building sitea, Commissioner Whitted clarified that the Planning Board indicated to the Board that they would like to reconsider the minimum lot sizes as part of the discussion on industrial development in water supply watersheds if the Board would permit them to do on. Logan Irvin noted in response to Commissioner Lloyd's comments that stormwater management procedures were relatively inexpensive and very feasible. He also noted that most of the opposition to the watershed protection measures was from the most wealthy landowners in the area. Commissioner Lloyd responded that nevertheless he represented the poor. Carl Walters noted that the Planning Board thinks that stormwater management should be a primary concern. He stated that in order to get jobs the County needs to project the water supply. He also stated that industry and zoning goes hand in hand. Commissioner Whitted reminded the aoard and the audience that this was not a public hearing and that the Board was deliberating on the resolution from the Planning Board to make a reasonable decision. He stressed that the three designated watersheds should receive different treatment and that critical data and empirical data should be collected and further study made of detailed areas for further application. ..` 421 "^-� 9 Dr. Kizer stressed that the idea was for the Board to recharge the Planning Board with reconsideration of the issue, not to make a decision. Josephine Barbour asked if the Board was changing its policy regarding- public comment and questions regarding specific proposals. Commissioner Whitted commented that answers were not yet available and that when information is available for public comment and response it would be an appropriate time for discussion. He stressed that the Board was not changing its policy regarding public input. Josephine Barbour asked the Board to clearly identify the action by the Board on this item on the agenda. Commissioner Walker noted that listing this item under Board Decision was the problem. David Shanklin emphasiz that the requested action was not to decide on two or five acre minimum lot sizes but whether or not the Planning Board should get involved further in this issue. He noted that Cheeks Township will eventually be zoned and that this was needed as protection for industry. He stated that the Planning Board needs to know about minimum lot sizes to continue their discussions on industrial development. E-3 The TipLezz Extension Reqowst Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to approve the request for an extension of time to complete Phase IV of The Timbers, as requested by the Planning Department. VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, O. E-4 Request .fu �1ezi-izu4 The Board approved the scheduling of a public hearing for the Wildwood Subdivision to be held June 27, 1983. 5-5 TxmL_Jo m± By consensus, it was determined that the release of interest not be granted as recommended by the Orange County Director of Revenue. E-6 8ouaio{_Rmbmba Commissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Whitted to award the three Housing Rehabilitation contracts as requested by the Community Development Department. ( See pages for these contracts)VOTE: Ayes, 5; Noes, V. E-7 ledzig12-32%D/goemcot Reaoe ^' ~. ' '" un_LginQl Upon a motion and a second the Commissioners unanimously approved the expenditure of a6,9e2 for two UmTa vehicle replacements for the Orange County Coordinated Transportation System. With no further business for the Board to consider, the meeting was adjourned. Richard E. Whitted, Chair Sharon Allison, Acting Clerk AFFIRMED 1/17/84 , . . , ,,.. .; ,..;.,:,,,,. _. I,:. :,,,2:::;T;.;;;;-:-.'?,-- ■,,i,'..: . . . . . . . On:- , . OPF. COUNTY EOARO OF Ca-RISSIONS Action. m noel ACTION ry.GEND.; ITE24 AaSTPACT ne lb DEET.M; DATE 5-23-83 Subject: Modification of Class A Special Use Permit for a General Aviation Airport for Buck Mountain Development Company I _---- I ic X yes Publ II-=Aring: no .. I . 1 I " ..---- Attarl-Mleat.(S) : Application pg. 1; formation Contact:: Marvin Collins Additional information pp. 3-4; Letters pp. 518; -Information pp:. 19-28; Letters In Phone Number: 732-8181 EXT. 346 pp. 29-37; Information pp. 38-42 PURPOSE: To receivelcitizen input on a request to delete or modify three (3) conditions placed on the approval of the Class A Special Use Permit granted Buck Mountain Development for a general aviation airport. . . NhMD: The September 7, 1982 approval of the proposed Midway Airport by the Board of Commissioners contained four (4) conditions which Buck Mountain Development would likelto have deleted or modified. The letter, dated 1-28-83, from Mr. John Northen, attorney for the developers, contains the response of the applicant to the conditions imposed on the approval of the Special Use Permit. Four of the conditions are the subject of this public hearing. The developer is requesting approval of..a 3800' runway with 500' safety overrun on the south end and a 700' safety overrun on the north end. In addition, they request that condition #2 be modified to include a 1000' long approach-departure zone. The applicant has provided a specific list of uses which might take place in the Free Base Operator and maintenance hangars and which they state are for the maintenance of aircraft and operation of the airport. Condition #3 which the developers wish to have deleted is the requirement for a fire access road from the airport property and 'leer Road. The limit placed on training flights in Condition #7 is also requested to be deleted. I . DIRKT: The requested change to Condition #2 will probably require that Orange County Change its position concerning development of general aviation airports. Up to this point, Orange County's role has been that of a permitting agency, reviewing and approving plans for the development of public/private airports. The County has not attempted to assist such developments through "hazard" zoning to control noise, structure height, etc, nor has it attempted the acquisition or development of a public airport. It has provided a review function rather than intervening directly in such a development. , - . , 002 NPACT: : (cont'd) The developer has provided a list of possible uses within the F.B4O. and maintenance hangars in a letter dated April 14, 1983, Some of these useslappear to be accessory uses to the operation of an airport, other useslappear to go beyond the usual definition of an accessory use. No square footage of area devoted to each use has been provided; therefore, it would be difficult to measure the additional impact of these uses on the site and adjacent to the site. Deletion of the fire access road requirement would result in an increased response time for fire protection services. The necessity of such access was, however, greater when the original proposal contained the airpark, offices and warehouse facilities. ! I Deletion of the 50% limitation on flight training may increase the number 1 of "touch and go" passes made to practice landing maneuvers. If this condition its removed there could be an increase in the amount of noise generated by the airport and an increase in the perceived nuisance of the noise. I I n:,--; . ".:. :..1',' ,',V.;.-4.5.7.;;-.•:-•,',','-'::',.':-.•.:'.:,', ....-..v.r•;,;.:e;.7--•:,•:::::;. ,..: . ' .'*:-'" i•,°,.'„ 7,. ",:.•.,'- -..—4,.., --.,...-....... ..,, ,..,,-..,-- .-,. ', '.'',;.— .r.-- - •' ' ' ' . '.*'-' ''--'--11.7-:.':'■'1"44-t .,.. -4474',":",,,W I '"-• 1 . , . , . :' .4-;-:"'-'?.A?'. ,`.7 .:. :,`.,.•:',,,:: : • t , NOTICE OF APPEAL TO ORAGE COUNTY COMISSIONERS ..•OR REQUEST FOR. MODIFICATION OP , .. . SPECIAL USE PERMIT , . Notice is hereby given the Board of Adjustment and the Zoning Officer of an appeal from the ruling of the Zoning Officer on the day of r 19 r . which ordered that . • . , • ' . . . ,. ...... . , . - ----------- . Modification of or I request/a Special Use ParMit as provided for in Section ,.. . . . for Midwa Ai .ort owned b Buck Mountain Develo.ment Con :4 . -..-...-----.-------....------------ . . :,.... ' . . . ,. .. premises located in Bingham Township, HighwaV'54.West ,, • . . . . . , . said premises being within the area of jursidiction of a Zoning Ordinance for Orange Bingbam . County as applied toxtithenzaclodexiiacguactleacTown,Shipa, adopted by the Orange County . . . Board of Commissioners. Title for this prqperty is in the name of . ., . . /. . . , , • " 11-:*- ' . Buck Mountain Development-COMpany . ---------- .1, '-' . ...r. - r ..rc F. The grounds for this appeal are as follows: , _______ - - r See attached materials, especially Paragraphs 2, 3, 4 and 7 of letter . , . dated January 28, 1963. Applicant incorporates by reference all materials reviously ' -".-- submitted and entered into eVidence, and adds:I/Revised site plan; Revised aerial photo; Atatemene-from Peloquin Associatevaetter from Bruce.M. -1- 4.. r,.. -pfl i4A- 17 Ag.63:Lte..t.tei:" ' '';7.-1 from John A. Northen dated Jan. 28, 1983; Letter from Rick Cannity dated October 5,'1982. ',• Applicant also requests that all time reatrictions be extended to reflert .same inte3m„3,144 rariarlinal decision on this application. ,e■ ' 4. . Date i BUCK JUN IN JEVELOPMENT CO. '7,10, „- By 4011Kre--41 atOr-A—r S *nature o ppellant c/o Herb Holland Company 910 Airport Road . . -....., l'. Address ',...., h Chapel Hill, N.C. 27514 . 1 - ;.. . , .. . ,Y. If title to above mentioned property is not in the name of the applicant and appeal _ . --- is on behalf of such property, attach a letter from the owner signifying his approval r existing map, . , ..,. Appeal must be acoompanied by a small scale vicinity map showing exact location of .-. . of property with respect to existing streets, street numbers and size of lots, nature id of adjacent property uses, and other important features, within and contiguous to ':. the property. The names of the owners of all lots within 300 feet in all directions .1.1 from the property will be shown. ,.. r.. .1 . • • 1 i . I;; . . r ' *. . . ,- '- : -,:i:. .. , '',' ; ,";:.'1,,,,iclY:-.::,-.. I• ,'"•,,i-..-;I:'-i,•',.. :.,-,•::'.'',-• : ",, ',:,.1-:',•, ....I.,:;:::,...'. ',-,-4,•,•.:::' .. . . ' ' ' .'•,:: ' :. 'Lix':'„: %. ,, :.,• •.,,,,.,,:::...- . ...., -,..,‘,:f.,..m=.4,,..,,,,-.- • ,.--:1,.:,,,,,, ,,s,k-.,.;i.:1::..•,.;. , ::,7 ,,t:1••,,,,?,-.,‘,4e.t.i..,...,. ...,,:,k,•:, . .. . :, - , .:-.!=•: • ; :J.:.-,, . •••••:,::. .....,, :•-..., - - " f!.'.‘.-:.,1,i,,,,,t,..4,,.::,-,:.,,, r , - - 7•:,---q.-• •..7.,..-,,,,, , ,. . .-.. , . . . . . 004 --, .-- . .: .. •-..; , I . , I . , 1 I • . .. . , . 1 1 1 I - 1 . .... ; . .. . . . . I 1 . .. . . . . . I . .. . I I . .. .. _... ., .........., . . ........___ . .....___ ,... __... . .. .. . • ..... . '),„) 43.• 0 ti, .4 . r ( / i .. >Nti TER RD. i I C . .i ..., it'" ,,„,............-... ..'"'". Oaks I, . - _ 1 ,i- L ' -CI 0 5.4Apille-g, 4 a 0 I I 4,,,, der n cr it 10111' •,_ -, cs) /' - U 0) 0 4/11 i- ,, CIKIG 1 cl i , , ..:49.4 1 .• ,...___ 10 .... ,,:.,,,y0-,.! v,..,, 6 It. E ,...-.4,. er z PROPOSED.0,41:C.; •tr "..`■ . -ca \ / t co -,,,,.', 4-.' 8 \-i MIDWAY •Ix52' ,,t. \ ...,:t 1 , ) / 00 t AIRPORT -1,:ta,,.: ,,,..„:„,, a 4q IL i INI te. ' t 1 tll c .,---- s---1 t ,- - ,.. 5 . ,..--.., . ....... ..po i e " 1 \ ‘,„ .....s, . .......,,,,. _............„ . . , . „...,,„„„.. . , ..... _ ..... .._ . .. PROPOSED MID■ii/AY AIRPORT Scalet I.' = 4000' . . . .... , _ . ■- . 006 ,.. peloquin associates, p.a. /elk chapel hill, north carolina shreveport, louisiana architecture • planning • design/build route 4 box 174B chapel hill, north carolina 27514 (919) 929-7168 April 14, 1983 - - : Additional Information Requested for Proposed Midway Airport Project ,.. . 1. The runway has been shifted slightly to allow all obstacle free zones and clear zones as per state guidelines to be contained within owned or easil controlled land, except for the sena!l wedge in Earnest Crawford's property. The runway has been shortened to 3800 feet long to accomodate this, with fiegfetect overrun safety areas remaining at the request of the developers. 2. The obstacle free zone from FAA Advisory Circular on Utility Airports is the following: Approach h OFZ: "begins. .. 200 feet from the runway approach threshold and extends 200 feet beyond the last tight unit in the I approach lighting system." Run i way OFZ: "extends 200 feet beyond each end of the run- way' and its width is.. . 250 feet. 1 3. The clear zone from State of North Carolina guidelines begins 100 feet beyond the end of the runway and is 200 feet wide at that point and extends 1 to 300 feet wide at 1000 feet. 4. The T-hangars are typical modular units for aircraft storage and accompanying storage and upkeep facilities. 1 5. The FBO and Maintenance hangars are for maintenance of aircraft and operations of the airport. Spaces in these buildings will include the following: a. !Large maintenance area for 2-3 aircraft b. Parts sales and service c. Radio sales and service d. Pilot ready room e. Lounge f. Concession area g. ;Office for aircraft manager and staff h. Courtesy offices for tenants and transients i. Car rental office (accompanying parking) j. Aircraft sales office • pC 1 006 ' ` p i .ter-,.M•+.a..• •. _....._. .jl....:..u.1.1..N.itww•....rr.+......-:.r.wrr.. .. .wn.a«.r '..... t..r....:.4r... April 14, 1983 Additional Information page two k. 1 Pilot training office 1. 1Mechanic training area .1` m. !Storage area n I Toiiets 0. 1lnformation/Welcome office (-; -,'-` p. Miscellaneous space for the following future uses: Exhibition area Ticket sales and information for sports and cultural events Real estate welcome area Branch banking area Stranded holdover area Hospitality room • . • . . , . . , • r. ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT missssoROTTGEt NORlit CAROLINA 27276 .- 1 _ • 4;w4cto" • March 31, 1983 John Northen P.O. Box 207 Chapel Hill, N.C. 27514 Dear John; I have the following comments concerning the submission of an application by ' Buck Mountain for a Class A Special use Permit for a general aviation airport. (1) Since the request involves additional uses, and a special use permit is site specific in riature, you should document on your site plan the size, location, and area of those uses which you propose on the airport property. You should also . show on the site pilan as much documentation as you can of the project meeting the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance; i.e., runway layout, approach zones, isosonic contours, etc. This documentation should reflect your specific needs; i.e., 1000- 1500 foot approach zone. (2) You may incorporate in this application, by specific list those items previously submitted and entered as evidence. (3) A letter from the Orange Grove Fire Department addressing their concern about response tine would aid the discussion of the imposed condition of access to Tear Road. For your inf. lation, the following is a proposed schedule of reconsideration of this request. April 15, 198 - Deadline for submittal of application materials - May 4, 1983 - Advertise request in Chapel Hill News and Durham Herald ' May 4, 1983 - Mail certified letters to adjacent pii*erty owners and post property May 13, 1983 F Second notice to newspapers May 16, 1983 - Preliminary presentation to Planning Board May 23, 1983 - Public Hearing June 20, 1983 - Planning Board Recommendation t.. '•• .1: (1' 008 , John Worthen March 31, 1983 Page 2 • i feel the Board of Commissioners will receive the Planning Board's recommen- dation sometime between June 21 and the end of June. Sincerely, Rick Cannity Planner RC/dg cc: Orange County Commissioners Kenneth R. Thompson, County Manager Geof Gledhill, iCounty Attorney MarVin,C011ins, Planning Director Fred Hazard, A ent ='.74F;,": ' ..; , 7:4.. .J': _ ,,,I.: =-.r:7' - Y . • ,:' . . ',,''':'`',,‹:LL, ;: • 1:17-1.•,',. ;' : ,.!-;.!-L -e--' - ,- - ,z.%.e* ‘:.•.'",' ' -. ■ . . 009 ,..,, ,. . .(4,t1'9-11-43t E1 t. -4,:i1A 'tt.k... ..... STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P.O.BOX 25201 JAMES B.HUNT,JR RALEIGH 27611 DIVISION OF AVIATION GOVERNOR (919) 733-2491 \WILLIAM R ROBERSON,JR March 17, 1983 SECRETARY Mr. John Northern P.O. Box 207 Chapel Hi11,1 NC 27514 Dear Mr. Nor1 thern: I In response to your telephone call of March 16, 1983, we are not aware of any privately owned airports in North Carolina which own or have easements on the full 5,000' approach surface shown in Federal Air Regulation Part 77. As I testified before the Orange County Commissioners, airports arel.only required to meet federal design criteria if they receive federal aid, and even then, for approach surfaces mu# control only that property on which naturally growing obstructions might penetrate the approach surface. To give you some idea of the actual ownership conditions for public and private airports in the Triangle area, I have prepared a brief table as an attachment. I think it' s obvious that none o these airports, even RDU, comes even close to controlling the full length of the approach surface as I prescribed by FAR Part 77. As I have stated previously, it is highly desirable for the airport owner to control sufficient property to ensure that no naturally occuring obstructions penetrate the specified approach surface (in the case of Midway, a 20 to 1 surface. ) However, control of the entire approach surface through land interest is rarely feasible. In the case of Raleigh-Durham, for example, the Airport would have to control 19,651 acres to fully control all, land within the boundaries of the FAR Part 77 approach surfaces for the existing runways. I We recognize( the need for an airport such as Midway to be , 1 ' ' t 010 • Mr. John Northern Page 2 March 17, 1983 built in the County. The fact that even FAA, with its stringent land requirements for federal aid recipients, does not require such ownership is evidence that such a requirement is not necessary to ensure aviation safety. If we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Bruce E. Matthews Airport Development Specialist BEM/by cc: Mr. Fred Hazzard Mr. Ho'jard Robinson, FAA Mr. Rick Cannity, Orange County ''':.■• .'7-'"'",7it: ::#K-,; , k•., ' .:. ;i..t114;!. ,k . 5(W-4,- - N-..-'7' i •-, , ' '-'6"•:.`" . "• ' : t7.i•:•-•••—•- ' . .. • ;._.., ,..,.. ' :,. .t.:, ...;.;'( : :.; ..' f::,:;',:.: •••• • : •, . c:I ',• •• ;'• , . . - . , . , . , . ; 011 PART 77 REQUIREMENTS VS EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR SELECTED AIRPORTS IRPORT RUNWAY FAR PT. 77 APPROACH ACTUAL AIRPORT SURFACE LENGTH CONTROLLED LENGT ALEIGH—DURHAM (PUBL C) 5 50,000' 4080' not nn 23 50,000' 2640' ion on 14 10,000' 5160' no, nu 32 10,000' 2760' URLINGTON—ALAMANCE (PUBLIC) 6 5,000' 1100' nn un 24 5,000' 2800' HO OH 9 5,000' 400' flu 1ln 27 5,000' 1700' XFORD—HENDERSON (PUBLIC) 6 10 ,000' 1150' nn nu 24 5,000' 800' ENDELL—KNIGHTDALE (PRIVATE) 1 5,000' 1000' nn nn 19 5,000' 1000' . RIFLE W—SOUTH RALEIGH (PRIVATE) 16 5,000' 550' uu Uu 34 5,000' 550' UQUAY—ANGIER (PRIVATE) 14 5,000 ' 10 ' nu nu 32 5,000' 150' . . ,1, - , ' - • •:.,;?,e.L:, ;. -7'14%4 0 12 October 5, 1982 Buck Mountain Development Company do M . Fred Hazard, Agent 910 Airport Road Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514 Dear Mr. Hazard; On September 7, 198 2 the Orange County Board of Commissioners considered your request for a Class A special use permit for a general aviation airport. The Board approved the application finding that the applicant had met its burden of establishing by competent, material and substantial evidence the existence of the facts and conditions which the County Zoning Ordinance requires for approval of a general aviation airport provided that the special conditions contained in this letter and which will become part of the special use permit are met by the applicant. In summary, the evidence supporting the action taken by the Hoard on this application is as follows: I. Special use permit sought for property located in Bingham Township off Highway 54 West. The property and surrounding area is in the agricultural-residential land use category. A rural neighborhood activity node (BH-1) is within one quarter mile of the sight. The land use plan does not address directly the appropriate location for an airport. The Orange County Airport Feasibility Study evaluates this proposed airport sight along with a large number of other potential sites., The site proposed in this applicatien compares well tO other sites identified in this study according to the evaluation criteria set forth in the study. The site is away from current or proposed residential development, close to Chapel Hill/Carrboro and has g()o, d access along Highway 54. It has disadvantages in that it is located within one mile of the proposed Cane Creek Watershed. Evidence at the hearing of development pressure which could accompany the development of this airport is seen as a negative factor in this agricultural-residential region. 4 2. Article 5 and Article 6 of the Zoning Ordinance provide dimensional requirements and the application of dimensional requir4iments. Evidence presented at the public hearing indicates these requirements have been met. 3. The Orange County Health Department has approved an area for septic tank installation near phase I of the development. Phases II and III are to be serviced through the central disposal system _ . , 013 . . _ which has not yet received approval. Solid waste disposal will be handled by a private hauler. The airport will be served by decentralized wells. 4. Police protection will be provided by the Orange County Sheriff's Department. Twenty—four hour security will be provided by a security/maintenance vehicle with radio capability to augment the Sheriff's police protection. This plan has been approved by the Orange County Sheriff. 5. Rescue squad protection will be provided by the Orange County EMS. 6. Fire protection will be provided by the Orange Grove Volunteer Fire Company. The Board of Directors of the Fire Company have ihdicated they can provide fire protection to the airport so long as thei special conditions contained herein are met by the applicant. All other information required by Article 8 of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance and including that required in Section 8.8.8.1 was provided by the applicant at the public hearing. 7. Documentation from the North Carolina Department of Transportation indicating that all FAA and State regulations governing general aviation airports will be satisfied by the applicant were presented at the public hearing. 8. The airport if operated as shown on the site plan and stated in the narrative and according to the imposed conditions herein should not adversely affect adjacent existing land uses. There was evidence presented at the public hearing indicating that adjacent land uses could be adversely affected. The Board found however that if operat 'd as indicated and according to and in compliance with the that special conditions at these adverse effects would be minimal. i 9. Provided the applicant can obtain control of the height of structures as detailed in the special conditions contained herein, the applicant has demonstrated that it owns or controls land sufficient to provide l approach zones and overrun areas. The site plan and narrative indicate that adequate land area is provided for all of the proposed uses, buildings and storage areas provided the applicant can obtain control of the height of structures as detailed in the special conditibns. 10. Site plan and narrative indicate appropriate screening of buildings, storage and maintenance areas and provided the screening requirements contained in the special conditions are met. 11. There is a secured access easement to Highway 54. The access road will be built to Department of Transportation standards and dedicated to the public. I ; : • - 7=^!:7.77Ca7r--;-7.-77FrAy'k50:1P: 7;1A,.•; ?4 ,:.i t • " , • ' 4 • 014 12. The Ordinance requires that compatible land uses be located in the final approach areas of the airport. The evidence presented at the hearing indicates that the land use located in the final approach areas for the airport will be compatible with an airport of thisj size and scope provided the applicant can control the height of structures to the degree set forth in the special conditions. The following are the imposed conditions required of the applicant for approval of this special use permit: 1. There shall be no jet aircraft permitted at the facility and the Airport Facility Directory published by the U.S. Department of Commerce (N.O.S.) shall specify that jet aircraft are not permitted at the facility.ty. The applicant/owner shall be responsible for notifying the U.S. Department of Commerce of this restriction and shall demonstrate compliance with this condition. 2. The applicant shall own or control the height of objects in an area at each end of the runway which is known as the approach-departure zone. The dimensions of this zone are shown in the diagram below. The approach-departure zone begins 200' from the end of the runway and rises at a 20:1 slope to a height of 250' at a distance of 5000'. The zone is 500' in width at its beginning and 2000' in width at its end. The easement rights negotiated with each • property owner must specify that the developer can control the heights of obj?cts within the approach-departure zone. All easement agreements and other evidence of ownership of the approach-departure zone shall be in form and content approved by the County Attorney. 14--- 5 000' "7-* ROW& Z.:. APPROACH o DEP/MORE 500' Cs1 ZONE I I I I I -4/ 200' . . - • • '‘+ 0 1J) • • • 3. The final site plan and narrative of the project incorporating all changes, deletions and additions through the final approval of the project are incorporated herein and made part of the Special Use Permit. A copy of the final site plan and narrative are to be maintained on file with the Orange County Planning Department. Only those commercial uses specified in the project narrative and on the siter plan, including but not necessarily limited to the sale of fuel for aircraft, maintenance service and flight training classes, will be permitted at the airport facility. All improvements as indicated shall be constructed according to the construction schedule set up in the final site plan and narrative. 4. The following fire protection measures shall be provided by the applicant: (1) construction of a fire access road to the property from Tear Road; (2) a 24 hour/day vehicle for security, fire fighting and maintenance purposes. The vehicle will be outfitted with master keys, radio system, turn-out gear, portable fire extinguisher, fire fighting foam and airpack. Satisfaction of these requirements shall be! determined by the Chief of the Orange Grove Volunteer Fire Company (Fire Company) and the County Manager; (3) three ponds shall be constructed, each capable of supplying 30,000 gallons of water over a two hour period. The water level of each pond shall be maintained at a level sufficient to supply 30,000 gallons of water over a two Hour period by the construction of wells and the necessary hardware which would be activated when the water level drops below the required leveL Drafting stations shall be located and constructed to the Ispecifications of the Fire Company with all-weather access provide, The ponds shall be constructed in the following locations and according to the following timetable: pond number one shall be located 600 feet north of the phase one F.B.O. Hanger and shall be completed when phase one construction begins. Pond number two shall be located 600 feet north of the phase two maintenance hanger and shall be I completed when phase two construction begins. Pond number three shall be located 400 feet northeast of the phase three maintenance hanger and shall be completed when phase three construction begins; Access to Midway Airport shall be provided periodically to the Fire Company and its successors in fire protection responsibility for training exercises; (4) two hundred gallons of 6% AFFF foam shall be provided to the Fire Company, a portion (determined by the Fire Company) to be kept on the trucks of the Fire Coimpany and the remaining stored in the airport maintenance hangers land made available to the Fire Company at all times. An - additional 20 gallons of 6% AFFF foam shall be provided to Fire -- Companyl annually for training purposes. Two foam nozzles and educators, one for a 1-1/2" line and one for a 2-1/2" line shall be provided to Fire Company; (5) two portable 50 pound dry chemical fire extinguishers shall be provided and maintained in each of the three phases of the Airport. One shn11 hc lnrqatpri in thn .,, ,,L, , - ,.,„,14, -,;:,_ _. 1 , , • , , , - , , ' ;.',,4-,"If. f % '.= `,rntic_".'-fl'igilt:4- , , , • -- 4..' - 7:tip"-/ -1-:'•7 ' . - . . _ . . other stationed in the T-hanger area of each phase; (6) a contribution to Fire Company in an amount not to exceed $10,000 to enable Fire Company to purchase a water pump to be mounted either on a Fire Company trailer or truck. This amount is payable on demand upon the issuance to applicant of any building permits; (7) the following safety featurela must be adhered-to by applicant: (a) the T-hangers must containi no open-flame heaters; (b) no loading or unloading or storage of fuel l shall be permitted in any hanger area; (c) the requirements of (a) and (b) shall be prominently displayed in all hanger areas and incorporated into an Airport Operating Manual which manual shall be " made Jvai1able to all airport users; (d) all FAA safety requirements 4 pertaining to construction and operation of a public airport the size of Midwayl shall be adhered to; (8) a communication system between the Midwayi F.B.O. control room and Fire Company shall be installed by applicant. 5. The following construction schedule shall be adhered-to by the applicant Construction of the runway shall begin within one year of final approval of the Special Use Permit and all construction on the 'runway shall be completed one year after construction begins. All construction detailed in phase one of the site plan and project narrative will be completed ninety (90) days after completion of the runway.l Phase two will be initiated within six months after the start s of construction n of phase one and be completed within two years of initiation. Phase three will be completed within two years. of completion of phase two. 6. The grantee of this Special Use Permit shall post with Orange County, in a form acceptable to the County Attorney, a bond or letter of credit in an amount equal to the cost of construction of all public improvements, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing and stabilization of all areas in public streets and the erection of street signs, fire ponds and fire fighting equipment, plus 10%. The amount shall be determined on the basis of fully executed construction contracts or certification by a registered engineer employed by the grantee of this Speical Use Permit. Security for construction of the improvements in this project may be released according to the phasing in the project. Specifically, as improvements are completed in each phase, that phase and a. corresponding amount of money may be released from the security instruments or the security instruments may be renegotiated based on the unconstructed portion of the improvdments. 7. Flight training operations shall not exceed 50% of the total operations for the facility. I 8.. All necessary easements to permit utility (electricity, telephone, sewer and water) installation, servicing and hookups to the development shall be provided at no cost to the utility provider. i; F ''';7'7-s ' ' r . .„-,..:03;_.,,.`,. ,,t..., ',.4.4; i•.r,,tvoi.':v.,..,_ , '''''.%: :".■\:',.:'.' _^ `,"4 .''''-'-":1'■''iltk r.'t;.:`'.-' ' .' " ' '- -'.--7,'" ' ` ' .,11, .". ' '-';'''' ..-r ^':"ilir*7- , '' ''-1,*."-* :- ' ' '".f,',,i;;.4,1,,,,,,,:•.`„,,,,-tr`•' ' " - ,. .. 0 . 1 , 1 - t . * j .'t , - ! 9. All plans for drainage, soil erosion and sedimentation control shall be reviewed and approved by Orange County. The f.,. project shall at all times meet the requirements of the Orange County . , Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance. ! 10. Dense evergreen screening shall be provided for any buildings that are not at least 500T from the property lines of the facility. These lines are the outside perimeter of the property . , described in the following conveyances: Deed Book 196, Page 527 and Deed Book 126, Page 30, Orange County Registry. This screening 4....-1 material stall be of sufficient size to provide a 6 hedge within 3 years of planting. Also acceptable as a screening material is a 6' , 4; i birm or a Solid wood fence. 11. Any lighting of the rum\--w or other parts of the airport :I ,.., necessary for safety or convenience shall be of a design and so I located and screened so as not to create a nuisance to adjoining property owners. '.. ` :to 12. All public improvements shall be imaintained in .. 1 perpetuity. 1 All documents specifying u.sponsibility for en a i 11 ten a n e a of - the approved public improvements shall be approved by the Orange .,.' County Attorney. i.; I- , ,I.1 Rick Cannity, h ' Acting Planning Director ..i, Orange County Planning Department V , Ljac cc: Lee Mehler, Peloquin Assoc., P.A. i ,i. John Norther' Kenneth Thompson Geoffrdy B. Gledhill . 1 Richard E. Whitted ;. !. .. _ 1 , . 018 .�..�E+'..v1•... a....._. _..rJ�gdifL� ' `M__. ..�.r........,..»a.�..rw.., ._.. :4fL1J•iLwM.4•,._ r.�s......arnc .. ... .n " E NORTHERN, LITTLE & BAGWELL ATTORNEYS Al LAW 431 W FRANKLIN STREET CHAPEL HILL N C 2751.1 li WN A NOR1 HEti P. 0 BOX 207 I .iNDERSON LI1TLE f919) 942-415G n KENNF.1H BAGWELL, JR 19191 94111521 CHARLES H 1HI13AlT January 28, 1983 Mr. Richard Whitted, Chairman Orange County Commissioners Orange County Court House Hillsborough; NC 27278 -of} re: Midway Airport Buck Mountain Development Co. Dear Mr. Whitted: By letter dated October 5, 1982, the Orange County Planning Department notified us of the specific conditions which will become a part of a Special Use Permit for Midway Airport. Upon receipt of this letter, lwe reviewed the conditions with the members of the Duck Mountain Development Company, and made inquiries to the adjacent land owners Concerning the availability of over-flight easements as required by these conditions. At this point, and for the reasons set forth below, we now formally petition the Orange County Commissioner to reconsider the conditions set forth in the letter dated October 5, 1982, in connection with the Midway Airport Special Use Permit, and modify certain of those conditions as indicated below: 1. The first imposed condition provides that jet aircraft are not permitted at the facility, and that the owners shall notify the Department of Commerce of this restriction. This condition is generally in accord with our application, and we have no objection to it. 2. The second condition requires us to own. or control the height of objects in the approach-departure zone as sketched in the letter, which begins 200 feet from the end of the runway, and extends a distance 'of 5,000 feet, fanning to a width of'2,000 feet. We have contacted the owners of all the property located within the approach-departure zone as indicated on both ends of the runway, and with very few exceptions have been refused such easements by the property owners. In order to meet this condition, we would have to have the voluntary consent of the owners of the property, giving us a written, recordable easement or right-of-way to come onto their property andilimit the height of any objects thereon, whether the objects be natural or man-made. Without the consent and approval of the landowners. we are completely unable to comply with this ' - '7 • • 4' - 4 - - • • 0.1.J Or. Richard Whitted Page 2 At the present time, we own or control sufficient land to provide an aPproach-departure zone of between 1,000 and 1,500 feet on either end of the runway, but no more. We ask the County Commissioner to reduce the requirements set forth in Condition 2 to cover an approach-departure zone of 1,000 feet from each end of the runway, or id. the alternative no more than 1,500 from either end of the runway. At a distance of 1,500 feet from the runway, objects could be no higher than 75 feet, and we believe this would be substantial compliance with the intent of the ordinance to provide adequate safety measures for the use of the airport. As the airport is being built in a residential and agricultural zone, we do not envision that any structures will be built to a height greater than 75 feet, and would therefore pose no problem to incoming aircraft beyond the 1j,500 foot distance. 3. We believe that the third condition, restricting commercial uses only to those uses specifically referenced in the project narrative and the site plan, is unduly restrictive and would greatly hamplr the operation of the airport. For example, the condition would appear to prohibit any type of normal accessory commercial use, such as snack bar-or restaurant, gift shop, office for sale of aircraft, and other normal and incidental activities associated with airport facilities. We believe this condition can be made morelflexible, and generally be within the intent of the zoning ordinance dealing with accessory uses normally associated with such projects. 4. The fourth condition contains many safety features which are acceptable to the developer, but some are outside our ability to obtain. Thelcondition requires us to provide an access road from the project to Teer Road, but the developer does not have, nor is there any indication that we can obtain, a right-of-way across the adjacent property located between the project and Teer Road. I believe the fire chief indicated in his letter that such an access road would be desirable, but would not be essential for the provision ofiadequate fire protection services. Therefore we ask that this condition of requiring the fire access road to Teer Road be deleted from Condition 4. 5. The construction schedule set forth in Condition 5 appears to be adequate and reasonable. 6. The requirement of a bond for the public improvements set . . } `R'Eit f " �- • 7• R Y t e _ �{+f en,rt ,... I I�� I C SIC 4 y � i ,. I I • s'7"r I 7 . h I ' 020 • Mr. Richard Whitted Page 3 7. The seventh condition limits flight training operations to 50% of total operations for the facility, would be extremely difficult for the developer to verify or enforce, and appears to us to be an undue restriction on the operations of the airport. We ask that this condition be deleted in its entirety, so that the airport may be used for flight training as the demand may exist. 8. The remaining conditions, (Numbers 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12) all appear to be acceptable and reasonable as drafted. Please place this matter on as a Petition on the next regularly scheduled meeting of the County Commissioners, so that we may ask theiCommissioners to reconsider these particular items as conditions on the final draft of the Special Use Permit. Thank you for your attention in this regard. Sincerely, John A. Northers JAN:bj cc: Buck Mountain Development Company Peloquib Associates Geoffrey E. Gledhill Rick Cannity, Orange County Planning Department Ben Lloyd ShirleylMarshall Norman Walker Donald Willhoit i :.,,, - Iff,,• • . .r . . . , . . . . 0 21: _ . . , ... .7..., ..i .• . . , • .. .. . .. . . .. _ ._ • . . . . . . . ... : .. . . . 71. pAft-,- i..x./..../._•ri......,‘... .4.d in... a...7vsz/....1 ' • tys.,. (-11,-;/)/441— . . ,.. .. _ . . : „ . . 1 a aiv . , . 1 , • . - -- I . ,..• , . : . , 71/2,0.ift. -,)... /_g_ _73>.__1._ ,-plAe_e_..) .at.;,..41,;..2.4..a--..7.6,i- . . ,.. , ... . . _ , ...1 ... ..._ .___.... . ...1.....1..g..4.--/ .te„.x. la-a_ .1 e /Lt. -10./(.......... • ' - ' - ' ' ' :, :'*' .› •.. . . - -- ..,” -- • - ) . • . . .. . , . . • - „ . 1' .• . . . ' . / • . • ,•litigt.1.4,1401 . . : 6 ,,,t„. .„,t;(-•• - , . .. .......__„....„___, . _. .. '-t- •M''114' . A° . . .. .. . , . . • . • • . .. • . . .1 • .. .. 6.;...ft... . . . . „....-...........,,..,__........L:.-.. ....,......1,i_...,;,,:,...., ,....t.LL...:.....4-.... .,,.._-•,._-„:_•....:.:........„..-...--,...•........„.••••••_:,,,...:.:_:: _•.:__-:,:-1...• L....,.-„,•_. ...:_:• -__...-„,-....::•••-.•,••. -;,„...:,,-...::.--.;., -..,..--",--.."......,i.: : : ::,..,... ......r.„_•-:_,-,...,:„.•••...-:,,.,„:..,,.......„.„. .:••••-. - '.. - -. :••• •"....-:-..,—:-.•-•,.:_:..;:•,:...f--- ...,..---.--....,-„:,,.,:.,,,,•:„.,,,.•---.:•:".-:::,•-•. y -",.: ...,,..-. ,.::::.-:.j. '..„':;I.,,.'i;,...,:7-s:',?:'::...-:„::, ■•• ..4:.7;7777.77..t, -,.:..::•:•:--;;;.:.;.:...,,,,,.- )1/7 •'.,., _ .',..X.:Zi14 7.17.'-..;,,,D,''.f.)- .' ...'I- . .' '..',. '' .. '. ::::•::'''•..'s '..:'.-','•.... ;-..-..„,:.•;.:". ....-..:,!. ,.,..!.-.....,:.:.-,--: ....,..;,....,......2„....',..il...,-,;;;,....-.••,.', • ,-. .._• '.. .-.:,,,,•".,:,;...T:'., ,:,.... ,i'..-,....,.....?-:.,..„-,..,,,,-_... . ..;:.•.,+..,....-.. . ,--.:"....,...,.....„ -..,4-,......-,..!,7:-.4•t 'r' 7'''.,'r',,4s.' ''''.11,...J...t.,:7./1'....,i'Ll.1 '' ''''''":,.',.,,,,f;:..i'f.i.V.......•::.:',=:■'„:':1",. .,..,:„...:;;;;;=,,,'.:,;,,,,!„:„'.. :,:j.t:::,,,:,,;,,,,„;',.:it,r,'"*.:,'„,":T.7"," :t71.-.."•....71;:4*•,•;,••;:::•,Y,„'.. ,:iAr.,`..,'",,fi:;•:'-i''.: 4,&P -- - • 7:77-'77: --7-77,7:77. 7..):7: ',-..7.,:,Irr..:.,..•-.77•7:-..:-."-c:.-77.:;2-,;,--,,,-,4..,.-,,::=27....:7-"7,77: 7""..-:....:;:.•.'.,,..77"--;'="7;: tt77 . :-"7:"'-47---1-:-. *2..:-.,4.2: '0:1 .ii.:::-::21'.."-',...':.::: e.::' '-', • -...,‘..''- %7: :•'.':'•--''•"•',!....:..,'I •'••-',','!%-..••••". .: ''''''''•-t -'''':•"'S'''',.'r •''' ::'•-' .'"..:'' ....'.".:'''''('"‘.:.....'!..':',..:'',7 1,..;''':'?.■ •. .:.''.'1.:J.f '....:'7 '.::.Z 7:,,,,;.r.':... ,.",;.;,,,r/..:,'",.:■,'..:,•..,,,*". ''. C....1,' ■.4.,"...,I...i.•:"...:',...t•;..is',":".'..`...:, '.1....,',/,....,-;..,,".;•‘.".....:r",•,7_..".•',•••. `..,'", .,-„,.1:-:;•ir... it.i.,-..,:.'•!:".....',".••,'• t.''''''. . ; . •'-'7. '.,.-..'24':•:-...:•.47r••;•;..,.•''''4 r:'' .'.-.:*•:"'":777.""*.4`:F....,t7,-• .,.7-:-. ......:::::',..':;77.''17:7-17:7 „...: ,'..",. ::::-T.-1'7 '7.: ,....::• .7:,_ :.,:'f. ..-, ..'• ..... "';'..''','.,I'''''4': '''' .,,:::-,':,..\..,...- :'i'':1-,:,*-.*.4n.,*-.A,:',-.74,:t.:',1;',1-1-i74,''-',''''‘','-':r,).:i#4::::;.i-,:t.-:`,.:;"::..-__'.7. ;,'•/;-.;;-:,.'•?,`:-:':::-.r.,":7::+,:-;,c',,',-i..-■:+k-eZ,":"D":',,:-,,'":'T,I';:^;:' '''.:. ::,q,..'''',..,,';' :* '.:*'":;,7 ;:;'7::i";L:••?:',:fi??:-.'4;,..;4;,=';1,,,F,:::b:::::.k.:,:::: ::-,::':;%';'i',,•'..,,7',S'-'712';'''."1:*';',t-;- "-:: •;:..r,.:.41.1,:i.3.17:....Tr,,,,,i,r1:3;,..,,,.....-- 'L•!....",..--.Ic:4.,,,,,z.....7-, :,-,,,;,7•7,•..7,:,•;,,,•,,:7:-_,..,1-;::::.1.,,;,:ti;,..-.;;.....,i.,,:,•,-.,ii,rf„.:2'...,,LF.... :_.....„,,,..:.........__,...., ,...:÷;,..... :7.: ,....,...,:,...!.„..,...-,...,7.1.:.,,.....,..:,t...,..7F,.,-;,,...-:.:-.-. .:,1..,...,:,..;,:,,:.-,,....,r;.-:„...,-,..,..,,,,,--,, ..::A...,,....;.....,"■•'.....,`.'.':',''.'''''!'"...'..,::::::,:-;':: '-'..';.-0..," .- :",:'.'''''./..'‘.1.•••••:::...?•,': .. •1. ..,-:.•:-.•,:',f•'..,: •-.,F.,•••• •." :-,..,-.,..•;-•.:•-..., ,...••.: .:-=" •......-7:----:71--.:-.r.,...•'."r•--7:71-.:*--••-7",..;--7.--,. r:. . .-.... -[:',...:•-..,--:- . . , ., . •... .,-., .... . . "• - - '- • • ' • • 6)- . ' ".''''''f' '7 *---' L-- .- •- ' i.•___•"..' -.' • • :''..--. •-•*.:•' .:1-.4".---;.: ., . •,.-..,,-;•• -,..,,:: ,•,r...,,,,7.•..,.,7,,,,,-F.,.T.;,..,c..z...^. ,,.,„...-. ,,• .7'1' .4./1,0.',,,,'-.'.'...7."./s0,/,‘;',..- '•••••"'':'., _,..:.'.. _ !:".....". .-!-T-, . : . .:::-•'.'..ii.,...,:."-;;;;4'"•-:-....1„;-;.----..:-1.'-,--.''..';::;,.4:".t.'• —..,-.......f.-- •i :''':.. . ...•'r..-- . .....( .,x •.I:,...,..:. ... 7.- 7. . '.:‘ r- 1-7:;"..": ; ... ":l . •• ••:""".r.. ••..'.., ..... .-,' )..111 1.•:!24'11:;:i;T::::•;'•14..4;'/•".1 7.kt?'...;.. 1...:111t. •1'1. .■'• rt....•, .,:i■r1;e'.4.. . ,:e7^..".".. "-i'j; 1:....''''•-•:jjf' .... ;;•.;.z'','.:7;:::'4':";;V;7t.;:1;:;'7;".g.;.7::•1;••7.''''fix:".:';;'';':"./..;:■';:47.'"tr•'''.'''''''''*'?:li!.'t'i'f•'%4';:t'i''' . "'Ir.'.''''''''1-,' •f";•!'^r"r•' '..r/..•."''..r.,'`•••V'r1.!'''.■"..:•''...,•'" ,,,tr''.:"' .4.74.1....',1•''...-.1.,.")...Zr7,i,..^,..r...,,,(.••;.......-..,;(-•',.1•"Y*4,4•-.,...!..k-t•-•„,.2,,;.•_..,-i•r.,..,•::-.cw,r-,.7"%•."4.:--..-,':',''.C.:4.1.V1.,e'.•.''''..-,...:.:r4 ":,...';',*-....• .,, 4"--1A.-::!3/4-0,,f--;:a•h:■::•:.....--.••..*:.,:..:'•;):•1'iti::"..",...AM",s.,r4..`':`,,4 i''..'1%,-,‘-'. "..••":",*.;....../';.A-.,..''.:....„:•:',,,...3.."..Z.:4"*''•t':•.( '.•;•"...‘..t "..:••••.,'.02'.L.,"'.--.`••11"..•-••''.1=1..^1.•,`,*"."." ',"": ..."•'^ .41 ....r .' * .. .,:‘,..,.,. ). ' ', .,...' •:.,".., .'..1.r,..: ...t,.....2.-,..:.--;-'',.-,-•,-.,.._...44....,..4:_;:-..:‘-r; ...7 ... -,...:„.z.,....t.,..,,,,....1.....;,1-,.;".••,-, .....,,,,--.•...!-'1.-.....f...•4•.::;.''-•••,::.42,4•',9,•,-!.:- •• -.'......:.7t..';-;;;..,-',..::,:;,-: '.:, ;.',.'s V!*,'.t.`,.•.%,.■':7'.'.'r,74:::1=4,.....:-.'"*:*'7-:.,.r...j;..:...-.*,=';.,.:g•:....1-.,..-A4•::'-'r-4-.•':•-`;,•:' ..:"..i.'....:,i':.■..F'-. :,....' ..,:,.,,-, -,,....'",'.,---:.-. 4,-,L..;;,,,::;.....',vI,,, ,77:::;'•7'=:;.-"7,7;:-.,--..1.,,, :;.'i:"::".`,4', .....: ,/..;:-:: '- ".,-;:".":*:•;:?:^r,24•',.=;,":"•.-.;.':7;:`,:•,',,:' ,':. '- ''•::•'.:-...,1 :-...:''' •••"1-- -7,:. :•.•.••'•':'":,'•!.••:•07';'',••7.'■•'.'C,7:.;;;'72'''.4:4;;,'.'1'''.^..3.-?':-:'"•'^'-'''..igt":":". 'iitA:."..7!;...:' ' ,.:4,;'..";,,':,•.:'J..",!;;:,:' '-'.'. ■.:.+,'• ' !,t 4. •IP,7;-..'{?..0.,,'; .' '', ',. .::.:7',7; , ' ":, ,," t,"„a... ...C.,, •:. „),,.../..o.i r. ,....,,.. ...ii:i.Z,;..., .;;■:,;,;..._,,,.;...,..;,..,,,...e, . .. . . * •Av..,::".•:(,:•7L.rs..T '"--.•.;:...;"..[ ••:.",...."..r..,'''' "..,...."■',.:...:7, --.• '..V4. .";•r:',rt.....,!..::I'm',"••••.''..'7.:'•:77!7.1........ "......,.; ,..r-7.- ,1, , •....,,e.........-",,,,..., •-•4'7:-----r.,V ti ..;.".',7:i4',:': 2..-,*: .:***/''7',*4.!, -Y:1.7'..Z:-I'":iitil•::•t".• r."•':.0'.t;...,.1,t..'"',1;-4 7,N--::i.:•-..'-:-.0,....:f;';::;•:;,,,.:r•,-.., , ..,•,i.-'7.!",. 7," :`•r• 4 ..",.' z■-''':A.'' 7, ...:2-1,772.7;tt..;;,,,i4h-,..-'-A-: .,,,,.;,-';!: ,,,..,....t..4-47.,-.....,v,.=t..c.,,6e47k4,...'3;•7?* _-0- _ .ile,,,:0,.-..:"..y„.,,,,..::....1:7, ....',/-.7..1,-, 43-„, :...,.,-,,,:.- ',.:,:i.w.,, ,,,,---,;.;,,..:,f7.-,13...s.,,...•,..0,-,-..;:.;:: ..„...,....,,p..n...,...,:c..,..-..,,,--, ,.41'...;4:71.-Le. .:Stt'..."474:;"?'..'e'..tTit"J.2" .' ,.I.P ".4.r: . •""...,•:'";',L...:•.;'''%:Nrr,'.. .7.''',-;■"44:,':'::.':', 6t ;':•,..4.!••'''...%.,; 4,7-e ,---,3, ..,:--..i.....i...; ,11;;;;I:::;"4;k:,,,-:`,.. ' '4 i*,4:%Ai"..t.CsP;I: *:.;.'•i'l`I'''''"Y4f4"tr ; *" '"•:*).;,....' 7.4"ri; ''4':;5•":-','0.t"'.;:::••r5,1'fr,.i':..)ev?..- *?•,,•,--.-1•4;'.,,2•••0-;;-.•'-':-..:. ;:.•*a---,4-i..•,;.;-• ..... "...,...,:',.,:-..: ."...':;.-L'irte, 1-i- rigi.......,.... ,...tvs.,.....Ite2.0%.,..). tr.,...:.er,...k-,14411.„„.,,,..e.j6, ,.-,..),,,'4,,,,,,,a%„.15,tz,-,4',-,4›,':?q,..-1.:1' .t.,74'4,7Vi-r70"vir.:..,;tx,',.,:•,.t.ipl,,e,r4,1•'3'4•A,,,..„1..--V.StP.,,e-r„r...,...-=,,,14.7.F.... .t,i-.-,0,...,,t,ro.L...r. -..‘„,,,,,........,-- ...!--■;„.”.■: 4.4ir,..,1,14i A:4-,. .Agi..1-,,,..,A"'...,•.."..1PRAIr"114',,,,,.:14.....-1,.1.,-,...,,,....±1.4,.........1,frr,..1.),sr;1/4:',..A.,A.,1%-,,,,,,,, .•ro-....p.,-..-_,J,vt-z,r,-,..t.r,••',V•.,e....:".2••4"...t.°710,,,,L.V.: .X1',..T ...1.;.1.....,•1 ":.-1•1 '''...• , , -tr , ='.M.F., ' ,„......"..,.....„.. •7 -.'."••...,''...,".-• ••- ••-•-•1;',..„.,',;,...e. ••......r.g.,:: - ..t!....r..,•t., .r.•......c..." 4.,:i.•C'... ..'"'0. 0 Acy,i,),...2:4.1..64"..361&i.,• 1'.3.'^' •••• I,".'"lo,,- a'r•,,'.••^.''7,Alt.•`•, . '..L.I ' A,..,41,". otif.,.;"....VS' ' ...::. ,14'''',-*-",4,,,,,,e,-%:-,',41:.-ZN"4"..t)...`.1.0,,,,z,"477f,:,17.--0,-,..r,rt.1*>?',1...: z•r..0.4-itk.,,'..,,r in-''.if,: „ .. c•,,,,,c.4,4.,ii.:.4,27.1,7. •,-:•;;.•,...eckr% :,' ,,-_,,...„.,,_1,4,,-.•.. .....,....,„..,„ , ....,-12,,.,,,...,,,A.-7,4-. .-4.........,r ,,,,:-.;.-,-.Ws-Y,s•ie.:;-.....-:,3,..:•:‘.tiAge.ix:1:*'•.'4..-'- '7.127,•'...nt...c,-'1,....,,',...4i.Aw ti-t,....-4''''' '''•-•.3':•...,.'''''''''•'.r.t,.':5;:. -?....s,,•:t.vit,•-••,,t.,-,,4,,,.. .,;,:.•..rsFa:',.7543v'si5Ltis,..,,*ce "r.4....7,t4•4*:.-4-:7,..0::-..c:.;,-,..4.,,...,....1.-:,::147--a--.. .,+.41-,,g,;;-1.-,•;.1/41,r,:::?....i..5.;,5;,>11.,i,t-64,,c,zz-ij t 4,,,,..14,c.y,;47,,,,........,.s..;,4, .. ,/.1 ,,,,i-z.,,,,,..7,,, '.-T.. :17:-c,..:it...:,•-,:-* :•-•.,. ..1.:4t,t,---,....vr,..‘-:PNT, -.7•:.",...x.:•Ft-,',-:..4„tts..7.%:-;:a,4-,:r•-.44.1.:1;;:lettlif,;.F4:,:&,'4;:..1",, .k,:ivz:I.,t, -7'.:•.:-;1>!4,1;1-•,...zzi ,:lz-';',. J•:-•-•`-' ..1%.F. 2'.,::7•;4A4rc,!.>" t,f4,' .'d -R"' ',e-ge' -:,(;--%'"re"-''.N•'''''.4.:-';-,;: 7 "2:4't:,•* -..;..... 7 :.. .. .. .',.......,:..''.‘,...%1,,r ?. ;.''.*:-,,,,.1,*'„ ..r'!"'" , ,','''''4,1.;1:. .'.i-8-:.---K'''.4'' 'if --,■:;,-:*?-4**:17.t."Cit:.",i1NP;;V.;,71s..',7.:74Z7,447/iz'C'r.V.iir.41;?."1.-..a.e...,t,p,:crig.i,ti,i):14::1474.,i.:ttV44'...,..Z.; 1''''??4,:ii.;',7.21.-',.' "^:* ..":' ''5,-4/03;0`,.-. .''' ' ,'' ',..t,.. ,!-31',,; `74,1:,^f- ,:tc;I:"......,.."' 4.4-4”r4 ,".4:*".^.. 7-^11■:, ,C.*L7.C.,,.■',,e,:i,i.:VA..-,.;;;;)'•*-W,,....,..I.:•,-,,,,,4-- i:;`,....d;t:tilles,,.,' ,cle„7-..,„„,.*.P.";.„,. ..: •■•,., ,.,,t,...,,.,..„.i.:„., . , ....:■.-,,..la", ..: ..,. ,•- •":...!•,., -,.::., .,.,..:t. -. • •-..,',",,,--\,,,..-1:,,,,),-;,':,:t.,-/-.11-,....Y,i,,i,.,;:4.41-741,..;;;;•;-;i*,”„.,■.."..,/,41.7;"5._.,..'..,!;*.t"of,„,-1*' -4 '.. ,..,........:,..,•''' '''? .-•..• •... ,,..A--it,.. ,tr, •.„":%".., . . . - ..,--, .1"--'..-t ,•--.1.4 t..1.-,7..:•-:,,f..'.:-r-.:.-,..-iv.1.,..w%L..,::.,:..5,-..,,..,:-1-........,Hrt,3:=7.%:Tz 1'' ''-''''''.-_,..'''''''''"i'";.:1',...,.'!'''';;I:' .,....4‘;".'''''''.J,-V'''I'al-'7,.:7"61..e.17.1,11%';'''.1';k'il"..1-4:k...1!;,:s:Pii]''''34:4■:"‘Ia:';:•:V•i4'*t."e'..'5,f.'F;if'i'i';':';. .;"1-':71f''':(4,.;":,:::.;'!:':.;',;:z1;%;':''..-...'?..,,,,.';.:,s 4 tt:::-...;4-:-:,,; ....•,-7,5*,q.F.,;,- ,...i.,-,,s,,,,-,„i:,•• ' ;'.1-i';''''44''''.'''''..v'' 4e.:1"7r.rtif;:16`''1.4.9-P':;(,411.---1, "v:i.:.a. '...,-, :,'''s:4l'AL'; '''4fr ',f''.',,-",..... .-':..,-,i''i9'.',.....1'47.ti:.:,',..';',..:-7.4,11,j't.::1',.t.:',i7:.?:''fc't4ti...:43t'lj',.;.'N'i-,.'41'''.''?r...i1-`,,,,, ,',-;;;;4",'.•.,„.11'.1f,,,,";1;:. ''I..,,..r.-,....-”,.4-iN.t.-.-'s' ..,,ki,.., nr,,,,,i.,...71J-:--.t ''" '' t.,tZtr'' ' .N*;",:.' ..'. ..°f'''' --..'", ?t,..42..11.7.'...:7,%1•'..`V.,,,f,...*:'''',..1',-.•''1),-Wro,.'ck.:1,..,.:",,,,,A,...e.eIN,"1.P.'7.1%.'-'44'.);',%a5,..,“,."-rr.V.c.0,:f7; „.... ..1,...:•...1,..,.........,-7.r, -. .-. t -,s:.;;It...1-^.,,,,7 - „:. .. :.--, ... . ' ,24.z.,_ ,,,. • ..rio;?..!,--,.?„-t.,:..7.c.-4.,:-....7,,,,...1.-4.rAe.:f-.4.,--,',.-.1'...-.'1*.';',Fr.,,,,.!”..7.: tr,,,:42;144,.-0,,,,,;,-..,-,'•4:5-5.4.?,..-es,',:. ''.)';";iiir...!;■.0.-','4„,,..:;,.i42::',*•.. ::::::,";;;'44::41:41'.0.10,,A)4P:,"Z.,,''Aif,. .;&::-'•"Ltir."s'.,;:sit„....4-4Z4:^.1.....:;.31fii- 7":"".1213:f..:::■`;n1`...•L.,,..117)11',,c...',7-.5.-4,,'.."...7.•'..,..**..i..A.,.;,,,,i1:,-;.,...;;,:„Ii.-.;,40,',4:1.224`.:-:‘.„2.k.,;;;;•::::-,.,-,;:,:y.-, 7,-..t-,:::: ,.-i.v.f..4...i,,./.kk.. -/-..,.,F.4..!..,.!#:--p-..irA,,, ,,,,;,i-w4.,...,...,, .r. ../:=...-,vi,:,, ,-. ii,;,,:iy.:;1--.?..i:e4,4)/i4.7, 7'.'-lf,-;;;:.1".:(1„f..t.A.:t1-,:t1 : : ,I.t7.!-; k.; „..:,•,;",itR.:1!:':;,k;:,FiC,,,,re,,r:.4./.- -- v.c.-.,-•-.---;.,;;;;:g,,,-;,,,,!f- ,•...,:t.-...'.1,.,:',4;t,:,' ,. '.';7”;. . '„.c-,,,ze.,7,i;:-:,:,r-,..4.6.$.',Tv.1...i..2.-ip:f 41. tS"t4‘.3!••': 4",kl.*T'.k t-'. •'''''•"'"=';::.!.1".&.:;'''' ' 'W..•'''''*". ..,*-11.4'._*,'''... .."&• .'ZI TOAW,-.4..,>'''•tt."4%..t -.V..:1-1-6;-..':'" "1"''.'7"^;;•• ';."',1;:';'•'.. .'''''. .,.' ,rf.'"'•-t'''-;"`ii‘2.4.2::1,777. 41•"%;e.. '...".•"':11'4*.."..t.i"...;%'i.'7.4. 44••4Ii•.7 .1r,,..t .,.471(Wg,...4.i.Y../T4'....0.'03.'47:1-%.'4 .. .; •4hs,'5-X4..i,;',4.,:"■:',ii`r'..Y4.17.0i:777... ..0...., ,i,..,'1.8„;:i.';' ;',1,"-4'.k,S...a:V•I.'00:.'r.,....4;?4t..!?4.1...,AV3vii"P'.4•:. V.".':',.•''..7.4,..ri':!•4*,•• 4s•••,;4•0'.1).......4 t..!,. ..11,11..:2.,....11414.47.•',g4/14,,it',.4 i'Aj5114.e...tiZr.e,,P1,'.1.4.,,,,,Nr-,,.L.`::',!,-.:.i.tri .!:•;14,,,,IC '....i' '''''''' li ?:'''.'Is::r*:1'f'.4.'";;.. ..P.'4"'7.`''''^''''(.'''.e.'''Y'''''''''‘'':•141'!44.-?4-4r".,g',IS'A' 7..rz.'":VI',','6:7'../'47'+r-'':Fr'i.';',.-:`,',Z!' t'A'''''.':- 4 -......,, ::::::‘....,,,,,:.,:.. 7f.i-:.)-4:-.pi. ,..„.......„... :.„. . .,,,,,,,; ...-1,,..::::?..::::,-.. - .;,..:., ,,r.•,;..t,::,_,- ,,,..,,,-,,-...2::,:•,.6.: ;:::,)_F,,r..:,.,...,,:. :,,,t,,,,,i:;:z3::it:,•4;,..p.,f.l.::.,...,.c.I.,..:,- .:.::.c.t. ei..:s:\v.:Qv:„,-:..,,;k4.•;;d.).,,...zz-f-. ,:k--....ifp,e:..4;•t-*N*vyf;. _.,,..,,. ....7,,....,.....:.7.-;;;;;- -.....4 .:...,,,...........„.,.....,,,-;:„..::i.,::.:4:;;:,.. .,,,:f...t. x.:.. ......:-...„.:.....,..:,-4, .-,.,... .k;..... ....i.-.,-,..„:.,::-.:::.".i,..,.:A3,,.,,J,...-,:.,..;:,: .44- :4-,,.,_•,;:ii,:,;34,[r.p. :./...t..::,,,, ....._,.v;,•-:-.t..,,.1.st:...;-tt.,tA.r-.43,, -..,,,,...„::,.;.,L,..._,.....,.....:.,-,:.: .....,,...,....,,,.,.1...,. .. . ,, . .i.t.:, .,..(;44.t.4.,,,,.,,,.,:2r,•7•5-z_c_::„.::,-.,.,,,,,7,,,:,,,:,. ..",.::...,:.,,,.:,..,:i...f... 4._:::.,:.;,:::.:-,_...„....,:.:2. ,..;,,:,..i.:,.:.:..,.2.,..,i.,:..(:-?....47.....,...,kik..,;;:....:/..ii:1,,,ti,.....,:•.;!... .„ .;.,::::: ,.,.....„:; :...,,,.. .................„,,..,.....„:,,,,,,v .,,•,....1.,,,,. ..,7,. .,.. . ,....f.„..„. • _.• ....,. ...,...,,..:::,.....!:. - ,s,"-..-.-.•,.,,:-Y.,',Y4..0., ',..t,',-r4,"..c::::-1'...:te%r:ti,f1:?..st.4.$7:1 7-•• ...." .....r•A... 77- •.••,--..-•,..--,:,.......1-...,......,,-A, ....-••,,i..,,-;,..-..A.„,,,,..,....;,,,,,,,i,;*:,...,.,:••,,,;..:4 ....,...,-",..,4,,,,• tr4...,..,21: '7 :7:::'''''.....%.:'■,...1.'-.''''.*:. ":•'',“..'i.'::1',•'' '',,,,!:4''-ii.",,i',7;fg,&44**:Y.'7" ;.:1:7r,`;',it,-,--...,Sc,:f„;,,:„.,,.:-.,„::.„7::: 7,%-.... ....,1-'!;:::,14„1- -,:)-%.,,:,`-..'';'''..''..,...•,;-''I'Ir*-'''''',-,'It., .Z,-,. t-,..;--.?:1,-:e."":"•;"::.iFi-,k..;`,+-;,ta-0'' - ,'.-''',.''11.;,7.,',.:.7■.:1':'21i. ',:..3';' ,.."-itta4F4.; ::=14,.:1":;,`::iFj.14',"..;',:''''i.%. .'-4"..:Ye,"'t2" :0;4.;".".;;;,:.7.".1''''''';I'' : .:-ii',,''-'t.Y:0:.,-::;‘;',T'T.`:-.A"..?.`.. Vii;.!t:,'""Z .,97:ii:::,=,=4"7-- e2(•".:'?"1Atlk.i4::e?4:; ',-,';'1•-",, -'',.1'.::."-' ',--, 3',1'..Z.',.,: i4;,:---1.-`, 4y,.) ,,-:.. ,,4.;;•,.:,"*•,•„.7, ,L.`;,-.0,....5.-„.,, .-..4;,',,,..,,....r:•r.'•-r`t<f,•.7.1%,■'-`..r••20,:-.::::::C.:Li.s.,....17f•irgi,'iit.--;:,:1,"•*P•CliCt'-'1. --",-::,,,,f4,..,. '---.--...,' -:.r'T: ' .. .. ' -. r•.,..,..-'",,-,-,...' '-:' .. "— ' ' ' ..-- ': ''.•. •••:..«,•-•'..:. ;'-" '"--:,,,..-1.7'', •••'--.2.3.‘''....'"',--•T--,...._.„..._,-•-••u..,...,..___•-e-- -L-4 r,,_„_,•••'-‘•'•1"-:•'-,:---'r:e•-•'-'•`t.L.-•=,----.',..• -..: •;:;,.:;,,7-,:...1- .71;:,' ;:,,f...;74'77.,;.4,.,,t-';:i'i.,;,...ii,,,,,i-T...y.';,,L-1.,,,ij.i..•;1;....::::-4,,.,,,.3,-...4;:5:-.::'n±:;.,:-..;;.-...1,17-...4.1;,:::,.., ..,:',..,,-•::i......,.*TE 4,5, .7.-'...:',.-'''...c.‘.'.-."?..-1;."•:-.k--.Z.:;:r7..:7-,--::,.;,..1.,......... •...,,,,t,-,....:---,•.-:.,-,,,•i•,..-.:.'-.,.,:..;;:.,.....' -.•:',:',:::•,:•T''.i,-4.'. •Z44.'7,.',334-'1..;;74:•,•?''','-',9,:r'rs.0.:12....,-.11-:.c.P.:-‘9,-:,i,t.'s,°F.4.-kx.17.?' '...-‘'.5:`••:•";.;.1.;,::)....:...!':-='.''' ;='-'...!'...:7 .':':"•*:i7r.-'''-'''jt'.t'.:.•-,3i.... .:`.-.'.--zi!,-;:....;•,1:•`,...,.t'....?--.*1:.:•.":-.'.;%-,'•'•.-4•P'7.i....T.ITVI'Al , ..,_...„;„...,,,,,,, ,...,........4.,,..,,•,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,...,•,..,...„.,•,....„,,-„,,,,,,-,...,„,,..,..,...,,-„,,,I,;•;•;,.....,.....z,,,,,,,,A.--,...•...,,..:,•••,.:,,,,...,...,......ti•-•,••(.4-,',...s.,1.::-.),...;..,...,,,,,,,..4,1,..*:..,4•---4,40,';':".;1503k 7.. ...._.:„:;i: ',',','...,....,;,•'.4 L.'S 0....,^.7."••• ''''',"..,..,PZ..i•'-',''At'.ri".t."'74''N./ .."-...''i'd:.'6.7,,...=...`,.-11,'''..r.,'''.', 7,".::•.....c-..t. .,.-,-•-:',. .-':",„.;......c.',...:4-f•-'4 41.,"... ''. . q Vg f-":-1'.6:':'''•••i.•*.'n. .'471.,"' "?•',4*—";i7 '7*".•-; ,••-••,,-.......,*.":•,-"It:.••L...,;7:C.,‘'..iii:.' 7,--L,?'2::-..f.:!' 3;,.'.`'.,.--.'",t;.-N,':,' ,"1..'.,.;,L•'...1,,,,, -•';r:404'..:':": - .1::..1' '7"rjjis,`‘-,,,.':fg;g'-'1;;':.'41:,!''PL4N.',1"ri',.:'-!:;;..t, ■='''*'1.7,f5;34,:"^t **•':,'-'7%..:i'''',-.:.;4..:-7,'4 '.43"-'71,56, I .:•:;,'',."..,:.,'''t:',',::',..%, '':, ' '. `.!., ...,-• 's'ev ''.:`.:',.`.'••-t•l'..t..i.,•97,W./'-'.:•......,_1:-‘,••• .!.•,•,f,;•••. ::,•1....,=..',,t.„t.Nt•7...,-;,,, Ze"..."21E.:::,..,. .2;..1..,.1"...V.;.;',:..Pi".-...V.:?,/4447;,44,1D,,,54,1,Cf.■•;" .•4734Z:;.:-/I: "'''''.."t':......■•;.".1'il'il.I?. ''.;•.:...A"t".'9.,:ii,--.3,.<1...L....r?,..7...."7..r.:. ,)..*,:•."' •....,?..4,..'".''"'Fr•n .1....;.'.^:1.,;. '.,..*:a'... IrCr.',r■e:,7-f''."..-,-C‘-••-••/-r-:-Ii'•':..../..:"."4.i-'•- ..,'„$.1,,-:-.,-;-''7.4t;r.:•,,..-f-.1.*-77.7:`%--•-..-;_-•.`,..r.,,t1t-rn*,' ....•7•'-:'.•-■:::"...!>•:-.•-::F.--% ;:c4"7...1...r .,,la•`.24.0.74,tie-1.'-•-*`.,si•-7.77 :,98,••,'' -.'"■:-.P....:".'••••;P:.;..',:e?,,,,.!.-ii•I'..:,.' -:,,,Illres,A.,. c;-..,e4A1,1 =:';is2..k.r.i. ;..;.;,-.,!.A'r,s.4:•.-, -,...i'.,..,-,.A.4... ..1..r.,,,-0,;),,rit•14-1.r.•:14.%„4.44_,S1'....:$,,,',.7; ,;._......,,..:.,..„,,,•„.-7.r.4.,. ,...,.,.....;-.4tkak,A;:-.,,,q....}.0...,_,,,,..•-•••••.;- ' ,%.-ri,,,;,-yr.....r. ,,,-!.,..,::,,',,'-•,,,7....'''C'.."h:A-.:.:,,,,,,,,,....;,::-.;-,..4...;',4;3..:,--...P.',277:f.,iirq,':-.:k;',4'4.'...e,' '''':!0'../I Vil;-i4,7,:44 s,',.-.■,.1"4-,,,='-%',t,:-"tV,".....74 ,''''‘" . .........:;,•,'-'*::•,14.4'•",.`1*.,: /*•'-:71-;L-;,;_t-7:•„,.:P,',_""i1;••'•■7,..4..-- ,•, ••• •-• -,4g011.4.4.4-. 0,_' •-'':.. '•-•••,..,:::::W:■...•„.V.'1.0.;.:%',..-...:?,•-.1"4::?2,,i,4.,P.,i.4,7...1.,;;.:-..-*.e.'?.?1, ,...---.i,....,••!..?-41...•''"'i'L.4.4t..7.2.:,,,),-..,v,e-, ...:13.xi.7.,-.4.,,,.. .,,tm:vx,:. .-,---,,-.61..4P-',---, .,i, .,-.41,..pik:::,,,.-,:i.,..-,.;„,„..,,,,,,-.- •7:•,) ,,,,,,..7., ,. ..i.‘Zf....ro,+:-^:..,..."..., ...:'■.-f-•' '''i."“1,.., ''''''.„!e,‘• .....'."' '■''..."..;.. . ':-...:.7;";'''::P:,'-!:;'■-. .,;:ii"::'',./7.4,:%C.**..k,`:,!•;,.... -‘,..i...A,...:-..:‘,.,:inleiPP.,---.00' 7-:''..,.:1::4- ..75.;.5X,t,ef.:7:L'7ir•Ls-1.7.:÷.■;"'7.';'9.?.. .::":."‘;:'4.-;,St-:r.,;''''.;12,?:,R....,,;.- 4...:-...;'',,...:5,.:,,,Ini7:,-,..51:7:,:i.....,A.,",,,Iirr?,- 15+.,:..Z-:",-•:7- - ... . 4 - ...'..% •:' , . . . . . r!-.-...--,:,: . -. • ,.,.7... ....: -:..,-: '',.-'4:: : • .,-. 7. '..-.. • ..„. `,.«17.7::,....7,:,1-:::-.:?.."-,::.?;,...,...... ,:i.: • . .. . ' • • . ..:.. .- ,. . . . . . ' •• . .. . . . . . . ' „ . .:. - • . .. • . . . . • I `.. : '• ' . . . : . , ... . . . .. . -• • • , . . . . . - .: .. . „ - • , .1 . . ' - . • • . , . . . , 71 .ei.ite .; ,. . . .. . .. 23 . . . . . . - • . ., . . . .. . .. : . . , „ ... . , . „„ . . . . . --. . . . , . ,,. , ,. _____ .1 1.,- .... ce.,1,e7te . .. . .. _ ,,,2, .x)(.._ .?....,- --35-- r. . . . . „.. . ..., _..............„ ____, .._..........,..__.................._.-7"- ----' --.--'7 .-7-'.- - ' . - . - • .. '.:.-' ' '..L.04. ..:-,- . .:' ''.-- '-:.:: '..:.'-...:. .- -':- - .: ','''-: -. .- ,...:--...:: . . . . , ... . . . . . . .. .... .. ____H., . '•- ... -. .----,,.... -.74.-.17.,.!....,..„--•- --C..7.7.:.." ..:.;• 77.; • .:.-,.... ..".,•:•:::7- ,;,,..... .,;%•:•,'';`:::!--.2..il;.:r.;;;::,:fL.:„&._:".1:::,,,z:7.:,!../.,,"!,:`,:•"...;fi:•..T;;;.:.:7•=4:1.. ..,1,-•.',":4".'1;•4'.";.:.';',""":;.;;.''.7';:•'.•1 ,.:'' ::::',.. •.` • ...' .,•';',..' .%•••.:-.., •47•4•;•,,: :..''..ii:::',.., •' ''.- .1-, .....i.,..--•:,..,..:.-.;„•;:-..-,:,-.- .4,",....iif,.:;:'?:--'...,:_,4"-;‘,..,::-.;*--i7,..,,.,t•-:,--..;,),:::::::_ti,u:4:,,:-,::-...---,,-..e..5-:2-, -.:i-:::,,,,--;14-,::: ;,-- :-...-- ---...:, - i I.:-7' -77,''';'...: ...I '''•••*..f".•:*:..'"I';',•: ''' ,l7•7. *• *,.-**.'*'-:..*,'' ''•'4 F',L:F, :'...,F.-:',:• ''.'*-7,F,.'' PF,-.,-."'.;•,'':'..r'":-,,.:-:"..'''''•'..F'F---'',l'""FFF''':' ''''`'.•..........'' '......f.. ."..,... ..,.,;...•---','-'7"-- ', ::r .„:-. t.,,F. , :: '.i.F,-.",..'. .F.-..:-.•-',">F -..--.-. ' -'' - r•-- ' , '•'AL-""''' -• ::'÷.- -7,-......,„...„- 7,.,,,,......,".',.--..,:.......,•4..•.!, -..,.-;•;.:•.:-','.-••,--•,,,.:•-,.:',-F',4::'..!.•'..",-.,,,•`:.,-,*..'''•"'''.:"•7'.."•,••••:-..;"*.ZP.: ---:-•-• ..'L;•.----77--7- .'''.:'•":'. ...:;''..,:,:,'•.:■•• •.7,•••;L...•:;•:•:::1-1.•.:-''-'.r.:/,'-.''"'..;1",-9:.'';':*c;•••:„."-!'":7-.:;•"*,:::-•""•:;•••••••,,E.:1'''-`:,•!.:::,-:*.=::•:••7•;;',';',:•'..';'4,:. ',''', ::1•'''-'•,,..r•::''LL•i•..?".:".• ...:".'"•:',...?-,:-:":.-.,4*.s:i,.:-1 :-.-F...,.1•-•; •-"...L --. "..'7`i:=.1-•s".'-',.*•"..:-.,z.."7',.:,1:47.:-,-,..•,::,. ' '::!' -- ': ''' '•'*"r''' '''-'''''-''" ' ''- ir'''''.• 041C..;•: '•.',. ,,, ..t4.%•7.r.:•11'...k%2;,7.14-":'.'''...f%1....'•:..::...'7:•"..•4!..**:7-.'■7'74". S*:"''''''''.'':-.';&''''%-'1""'"'•**"r'.'"''''''"''':.*' ...,.'.•i 7 '...r.i''. '. .".:.:,-•;IX'"...,•;'-(..a'"';.'''*•...' ':*;''''" " ."••* 1''...:-'' . „..",7-_-:".....,,,;.,...-„,",,•,;.,,,,.„,..:.,2P,,....-„,..,,;,,./;-;%--,,:...: :t;',.....:,,,,....!.,:4•••,../,:.,";:..`,„4,../".:',-1.41i47::.:-"Le;'-'',."-•:;',-j..,...'''. ".:....'''"-,...%zIFFi'3;4'.:,:FIF.,, ___.........., • :.,. ,...-:-.-:J. ,.,.. ,..„,.,„ ..„..:,,,,,,,....,-,...,....,'7,7:!,, .,,,,•4.,•;;;.,1•••4'.4,,*,.**. ,........'1,.1"7",!,,,,r7.*7.;771,•.1..;•':•"••:',..*V..."4.ZiA7."7.",.4Z 4.."....../..:fi,sl-.....„-',::-.,-:"...t,..:•,-.'...7.v.,,e'f,tt:■-.t'..!7r,`•1^,..'V,7,-..::::'.'..7.4'.7;:::...75,.4.-;:i7,;.-:.4......7 '.''• ''' •:•••:;..• '.: `-::•..,.••••,.•'' 7'-..;.•*';:'...-:::`•-e:,;i^--,:•;:.-4:7-,-:•:rt7'•••,.-'•7.4.*! .!. i7 ..•.'",;!...i7-:: ....1,'47€;;;;'...•,..,.:•,. . .:.:.'.7.\=!.. .-:•:"?.."04.■",''..:-.t,*."-•:'. FL'7,7";,..?..."...'..,,,,'.,,'„ , ,,-.::\ ;;+;'' - - :, - -'-r-,-.1-,-;-%!-:''''7.--'-',-'::',f--'..-:•.:.C-17'%1;;.-s:-.-:"...--' '',-,..74'."...1.:r.-1".i.'".'"^':'Vfl,*".*;' 0":,.r...,,?, 2_47,!.'.;/".r. ..1....."*..r"P:;(:::::-..,..'..,'_•-,•`tr.`.':",... •.:74.4.e.,.:..r-,:-.,..:.,.....A-.-• ..._-....;..-.....:.:-,..- , . , „..„,,.... ,z..1. ,i,..7..,,k„.:;.:, ..7:c-•,.;..„,,,,-.;.. . ;;r, ;:.i. .i.,?,;2:4!)::;''-'"i,E4*:'.7,4:-,.'.7,.:. .,..•;,.. i....:,,•'' .' ,it,':': , , .1; ,.. ,.;,:71.,...*:„..,:q.:;:j..;71.:c,S.."7:77I.J.•'"4..". . .,.....- ... „.. .,,,,L r.:'''...• :'•::-•:.:7,,.; ,.:7.;::-',.,:i..,,.. ..:..:::...,:„.'"' : •,;;;;,:t.T.7,......:4;',..,:.,..„4..... ...„.'ft,,,:.:-.;:s.,';.i.„.::',L,'41,":,,,,,,, 5',1 ,":'!....1..:47,:11;";;,.12.• 6",,:.,4.. ..1.1,±fe.',..:_7;;; ;',';'.:36`;2?:..7;7;,::.•'.': :7:•...:':.:-;•;:s•,: ';'::::".:::::f•ii.":4;.• -•11..F7..47.'';';'::••,"=:%'.'i::: •-.I..7';•,';',..::`,...",;4,;,:::'..; ••;•..,:i'..?•.:•• ;.'7Z!! .:,:Y.;•.•'-i.;•.;:4'.;.f.,F,.;:',"2:•;11.-.:":tS•ZI:47:'.:f P'''..Aiiii!.."•.‘?i•.:,.:.: .%;.:••••-;'•'•'•,;1..', ,...7.:".**,,I,L,' 12: ;.' -"-'..?1•ti:•'."•;*;;;;: t;:• <•? ...k1,7..1'.4.;:;,■4;.gi.FiTt.,!.:..;-..K .,'"i.i.::::::.1.;::.;f:+i,t..•'.'2.-,71^4..:tal,e7rAf_I- :. 0,,:.1•, - ‘.,.•-•0.. '"..•1'`‘-'..' r%77%•'''''••••••••'-•.'--''•- IW.- I-4 - • • • .-- •• ,, .„ ... r., ..,. A.••,. .,.• .,.. :.„...., •., • - ••. . • .., "' ...„.,17-., ,_ .-, ,,.-.,:-.*.-F.-4;c,•-,,,,,,,,'•»••';-,,,:..:•,-.,k,.,,tv..':•-',.,;::..-:-..T.r.F:...,..-:',,,I,,r;.,•--"",'"-;_.-;-%,5•:.,.,r-- -,. ,-.. ,,.,-..„...70•, ,-,,.,S,,,,.,..,_:-„,,,7,...1:....,7,:r.:"......I.-/_...".,7'; ;;,;;‘,,,:,:".,,,!: :.:;......,-, ,4:I.',"...//•"*".',:-",...r...;" •" '•'.**7:7"0".4..^:n......"":"'"1,.4*•.:;;•,Lww• .'"'cr,•;,i'm/r-,....i;',•,*2?:?:.;:',.t...,.;;;;;4:,,tri,:•./.:".•"•.;-";:•."*"/,...."4";,;(.4,',..0/Z...;t:'''‘X...;J.'''. -**,,,4*::,,;*7„......::'•• ..:.ri,■.* 1.**.**".;*.r.'''''1"Ci..i'r.2.."t;'•*414.74.i.ti‘i.. /,..':4i.;•/**:ri*-:iItr.71'".**4;,Cr-17;`,;.!...1:'•V'",...*A.T7*•,„...'t*Y.:#._-,.f.'S-,,,,*5.!:::.7-,r;t-_, ;,*.R__!,...q'..„,,;4.%`..,4•,S74.0,1.,,,,i;;,,',,„t:.'4.V.:Fe/4.1";.....t.;t4tr...!:•..r.. ,01,•*,'Z.*:...;•.:."•,":•-•J:ji""•"-377./t:;/Z'S.,?,.:':/7*, ".'-'._#-''''!"•,"','"•,;..,...,•••"; ••••••*';:i;!...•;•;?..,:,:r.*:*•,,,,,,i'.„■"/L4*,•••,1.1°-7.,-;:,...,,,-"71:7.2..•:,...F.;'-5„;k"...".:.i.'"'ei?": 5,:.-1`r':";,..",.*k-I.:.7.4 W•-•'F..".77:1-7-‘7;.=.',Fit-41,,,:r.F..4.=.4%.-,■•ir':e.F:'!1•4,=,':FF.:-.•: FIL-rv4,•.7:,7.1,,,...--.•:.•.:::,,,L4.,•.•4-•,..•7.74;44,,,,,,A.44;„,,, 7 ■.:,i,•:,;,*4.4*:..*;•!?:".;:i7..,.,. . .!1*,*-;',":1,',','":":11;1,/,-**/,;"-5"474:7;*"...,-..),...:1."'%**70•:,..:At*...."'.44.."',2....".?;.;-•"4'......:-......"*..".•*";, ...", ',,,7„,;_.:"., :'"_, ,.".:, ,,,„.. , ,,i.4,,,...4. .7..,.,;,....i.. ',...:?;;Ii.".:.;,,-,A.?..S.',;:..1.4 '""".•.,-,...,., ...7. .....:".; :r`..' • r..-.....;....-t.4,"T.,"-.,:•/=.•-•.t.•:3,1,A•.1...77.', # ' ';',•,*i'.. 4'''', '...*;•••;:"'•'''.;_*'4 KW,'?..1,?•17 k."4."."1-'#-1.-.71.f."t*".: ^.7:•tr,;:.,'-,•,.....FF.;-,;c._,.„:14:: .•F\.,-.7., ....•;r,:.,TN■rdi:•...‘s, ".1.".4../'' ,4,•%., "...t -...; •■;:;-,4) .:. ":"* * ".. •L`*:'•'.."%‘" '.• ..4.-'..=#''• . i:;,,*& 1. "1.1,,71:,,*';','''i';rr**'• • ''' ••*";•!..-*.. 4-.'"*".11'1'..• **. • .0. * je o'","; -. ....:...../...;,,.,.:X.''.•,:,. ,^7....5..!...•1,••:..r,,..,.17:F.':F';•-•11/tF.F.1-."7-::Fi.":7:'C7'-•....::(''.•:;::::•,e'7:': :"•:."1:-...."Y4,:7..i.i..:.,...*•2. lil, .7..;.t.. .:1-„'.,..%v,..,:;f:4.•.•,,,Ni!.7.,,:;-;.;!C•1•1'.V.-rj.;-". 44;*.;-...7'.7.7.'• ' ' ....N.',.,'• ';. -' ' ..':'......-.....- ',..--, ..!,, ,.■,:' .',..4,•"..71%.*r.**1-.."01:7...../".■./...1',:,,el :- '.;*.4.V.:44110..";''-''''.7.!1;.."'".."*..' ••••''''''''.7.* ."',-..:"..;5•?:•#..r,r7:::"i".*fl*:,--f.*--•"-r..7,•,-,i7.4....',9."4,--,.;;?Ip..--.....t,.'7"....,,,,,:•>!,;:;-.. :7•-•-•• '-•••' 4••••=?"'",fr St••#"'"•••4•".‘) ''''..c...,‘"C"•047•4'. • ••• •-•, • ,' '•"'W••• ••• ' l'1/4•••.0'•.,...-4...••••...,,,•-■':-.".-•'••••.:•-•",••,, '..c,.......•.•,r..51,2.,-,,,,.-....,.. . , ,+.,...Z.i-ii:••Zt.".•:"....:-,.. t::;,••,..,..1-'t••,;:,,1:4.±.:-..-.•---.411•!•••.,*•I'‘p .V.'• ''- 1 ■,,,' ' .I'• ''''• -••- ''a- '' ;"." V.. : . .,r,s,.',.....•..... ..:.,:.•,-.1,--,`....-, . `‘ .0,:',:-.P11.'r-:`,.--ec'irv' "F4 Cr..3-,e.`!....:: ',rte..,..'''..,-" '-'' ';-',ri:".,-,.,1•"':,.;,S..1...:,,;.:•::"i:,.,...1./:-:.:-:.:,`,.(':e..8,,3ti:.".':..;;0,;%.:-•,,,I i 2..::.::.':..,'01:Z,'-p7,;''::V..:,.':.i6,,.'%;7,V,,§7t,,.:,.,6t:4S14,1tPr„,i7nZ„t.k"),i.":..,:-.,?..4.4W--....,1A:;i'%4-Y4-Ar..:q.'.V.3'.4_',4:*.'"4.'.1/4t,.i,.--i....-1,v0s..4,7 k.:':,A1'''-n..A..4:'n.';:0V.'.s'0,f”?r1t-*C*'.'.-,.'41,0o,,ei.‘7'..',",.+,'ceN4F7 R‘i,,".4..-i.,?t e'v'.V1d■1i*.Wo,-.:..Z.'.',.:f•f.1',-:45,t-..',.p,.,,.,".-,r.,7,.'i.,-;:;.,-:..."":..."?,''•"'1:".1.'4 4'e''4:''.=,:1,,`1/41"t..'-,.•...;-'5--Z.'4",..4,..,,1,4--",.V..r7:...i::.:R.:.,;':..:„t.7:.,'.:4N-„.N....,..i.1,,.7.'..1'.s,L:•.‘"..',.,.,.i..,1'-1-.",.i 0.-;.,t,...1.,,'''.'.,-'.L.,.,.,'.$:P,,*,.:-7-',7t:•..4r..1 2....«..,.,.P-,,,4,k,,,,1,'4,.1-,i 51„":'.:,"."".-"':.4.,•'_t T.,,....,.,.i.1■...•„!•z...7ii.r:':.A'4.-,.-*:.V-4.•.-.4•:,.,$.__::.•i.0iV:0,-,.n„.--......'.,2..,"-.:._.,,r„,"e.,67'i,r.."':..ay44";4.7..'.:..-.4.4-,:.4-",f.":r.4,P1;t,"p%4.:Ii:n..■?;,.,'-,.:.:.:.;A.;i'.::;t.;,.1.:,.7..;e...k 1 ; 7 , i4N : -,- - ,A, 55 & ,-...f..:,. W':'4''1T-.y'T",:e.'"1'•....1•.1.,.2?,-7.*.41,..i7,:t7..i.Ai1•.*vi,.1.,i.i.i,..i:i-:r4...•1,.:;•,:,;4`e&, ."../7.:..1r...!sl' U,1,„:1 7-,i -=----.4 .:-- .- - - . -- ,,w..,,, 4.0;74 ;.',I:44 it,„!tas.L.,1,,,I,e,r$1...,If-to 4.11,4,1.v.....t'''•i.„4.4,4,1:,.;„- Le , '' -,-,F-. ,...-it i-tk,"',.-1..v-0;7 g7.- -0 4-...-...., -R". :.„, ' , •-,Y.-' --4"-OZlIzidNz.,f,,,,..r..r...,`• 4.,..4.4.:.j...11.4c..,- - ., •-,,....- -v. .4v .,-;:x....,:i -t: -,-.i, - 1 ' • i:-71 -1....".--, !,,-A;,...t47 414,(4, ••,..."01..sty1.0.,•••rlk•..-&.• ,........41..-...,41-4,.0,,r,,,,,,1-•••,,o4...4/...4„..- :.:',•;''71 •,.1....,.,..,v, *, -.::•..i0 .4.-4.7:::,5%,4 ,#:;;„:.-..V;•,.V.;•..!-..4:. ",.,Ti5;,r,i'L., :•,..444,:e-„/.,e.„-Q71:-,...._,I...,,,,,,ei .,...,,,,y.,..,4-134,4,,4,s,.....144•11.,1/4„..„5-,T,,:*;-:..-..vp,4•4•4,..,,:::-.x.s,..„1,:l..,_,• ,',.• :;„;v;,;p1 „_%;;z1: "0,1...ttor...,A__,..**It'.;15;7.1.z;f..',■‘-: '.43..., ',..:::,.;g:', ,,:k.,' ar f'....'''S .1'..L?..:',..41',' 'r `'.. •'I.',•'t ,... ■•:,.........4 ;■1.*••",!,......,o.net'....6.i.y144.0file':,,..e..•,•••••,:-.;-.v.:-.•••,,I,..,-....,,,,F-• •"---L'IAT■.ii.v,‘"1".'"-./.i!..Z.47:- .;Lr'''I'i.,:•:',;::,.47%;.-.•7:74°Z.,:i L'ef-%'4..""q••**'.7,• ' r•••*' '''''''''47'-'" ',"*" 74. .....-...''.... ' ... ;..■,..,....."7",;w4p4t ,...:,-2,14*.r4.,..•, ...00'54):-.'''V:ge'L:g,,e.:".Z.ge,440.kil.pi...0r,z..1,,,!..;•+, z.,,,,..4-7.0,,,,j,„,h...;,_. 7-.:•r71-,TW;;;;:: ..4:471.4t42!..■,.„4,7',..t;...:i.,,, .•-.-7•„„..1*,,.y., ,.....:... Z.k.•14..V ,;:,`144,7.-7 ,,,:'...V.-t4,"1.1f,-.40;tuWirS:106:4Fg.,.. ...riiti.•.41,f.1.7.4. **'t..7„..v.e.,,,,z.n.....,;&■.,.4",,NA-/,71"!1.:^tr4Irr,,e";,',,.,,l',. .t),,:heill:41.:•:-::.- ."'.i'.!'',11,:•i.eq.( .':;t';" '-:.4.; ftlf4FiZ,' 'i,:;?..r..,*73..,,g-.:-,S...4fi"-'-'4'7"..Z.7...,rei r;I:t!-LW4,,.:--,,'' ",...L0-4:;- 1-,14'2,:.L;,-,'. . ' •*.1,''-.':=:-...,','..-,";„-.PL,,',.,,,'..„":„ ,,,:„..,:,..._.1:;;I:a:,5,,4,..,4,!:,,,,11,,•.,,,,i..,.;:ialt:„4,1::`-" ,,,..,:"4".",74:;•:: .7_4..........,k57;'.-7 .;„,:;,• ;,,',,,,;„;„,„,,,,,, ,.,......:,„,.4.0.,-,tv.:1,:.-1,1,x. 1.,t,.:„,z,:z1Ft;•...,,kXr.-;...:,::rj....,e.f.rt,-V.Y:,!,-iii:4,14,KTi,":":,1.14,itp-Vira..5,-.:.1,•ig;;--:14..'57,,,e'.7-,:t.:*-■4-4.,,t.T.,,..4:47;7-5.,,'4.4.1411;F+4,- -.- Fov-4,-In.-•F. ,,,F....-,,o lc:or....,41 -v^t•.:,,:.-'"n•ty-.••••••-/Wsb-t4--,F.7".:I,,,?•.?.-.A.,.N.y,:gx,,•„,---fin:0"..1-:-,.,,,....1,"•,44.,•07.,'picc.>.....,-'A,. 4F,szr•tae;"`"...--40,444t-1,_"=4:1'..--'4-•?4•4>ai....,.PFF ':• 1,,,,,''''4'."'"Ft'' ,„.,,r,w...,-,rja‘tf; .•"F. -,T...., -r.,,$.,.....-4t...„,..„,,,,- .- •.f...„,..:L., 1. 1.s....• 4-..r..1.,,z-L.---rg-.7-'e•c•-•F'`I'•*yowl..-4-.1.•••••••cr-:m.- ,i•' '''.*•••• ' i 1;-4 'T...., '''',!"?.. "1"*.**...",-.# *"("1.•."-„,4""*.- -Fro - • - ,.--, .1,4% y.x.-....c.l..4"446...,' " " t•.4%.i/ • ••••. ',.,.. w -...-. 0.../ .s.c.,•,...,4 V..., ..-s. -IA- -.. .;•,:,.., ,,t,....t, e...„-.1.,, -..... .4.-. 1 , .,.1.0 .,-- •..4 ' A..1.4.1.■ ,,,,,-- ...,..•,.. ,,,4.1 ...... . '• .. ' ..''''■••,,114.3.4.. • 1,'......A•M,„,:...e..,,, ,,,-...c.,,..i.•.-:,-.0,...*;,,,,I.T.,v-4,4,., -A-, 44-...74:' c".•'''''Src ''''4''' - - r:' -- '-..", ..".,':P*'-..•"--.:: -,---";417Are-"+,Cit4f,:"1''4"4"'•14?,..V4'.."0,,M14-PM;44,7;''''':,-_" ''''.4::".-vr'' '''''''' '''''4';' ,...,<;.:;..-',.,-e.-1 : ',;,""i,r."..A IL:i.Z.*:;'.'.4""1 .1',Z1.`,1±.:441 ',,r4;.■ ... 1..1.:■,,,.fl .7.4m,t-:.e.-!,': ..t,;,11.7,nr...41!,-kg:`,--- ;11.....---''"'"A._,,,,".- '-'..- .."•t4x,OPiih. re",0-,--`4•71'...??: -..'t..06. ..'P' '''''S., ...,, ,,i-.. •i, 4.........V.44,..ir: i.-.-r:„..„,;i5.,4!•,:-..),)...`:,k.: .":Akse,:r4F.,..ie..f .,..,.--,....,,,t 7:.,,./?:.:.;.......441)cit.1-,. ..... 'n.f. .-r.,•-•4...,F,,,f,1.4-.1, .;,...3,,,,L,..%,:-,,,,t,,syy,....-4,!.fr-76n,i,s,.z,z74;r.,,',..,t„,.;•„ .i.".",", 4.1: ...: ..,-..*i.;•?-,' -'"'-"V:44.;-'1,-'•,'*-4, 7+1`..c.;'•' '',&.: ..,,Itt; ..,«'T,'l'F' -*,'•'..4 or',.1 .. .-,,.Z.':'.7,..11,,,. ,i''•:1-?:!"--.-:;..,....:trZePt-P1'''I, VI-4.17P.',5'''t.. .tig.'1.12-'';."."t1. -c:4:-.''V?,r."'..,..":;.:-.,,,.:..%,ovv",e •' , . .;..,n,,, IlL.,...,-;:-:.,:?..ill' ,...,... '0"-.,:g4. .,.•,-4,;•..... ...-,: Lit.tm,-e,_.., •...".., ,, ,..,,,,,..,.,.. ,,_.- ....,,i4V.,746Lt.v.740 .i.,,,,A7.4!;115:".d.•14f::571-42-::1-1Atl''05.141.^.• c... •=-/-$11',.. "4....:;',-•'-- '74W 7..-.ZiN.,•).47Pr.:7•3---15.- -121t-c%V.,tr trZ .'", L.....'k•-gttiV,.'qx.-1,11,,vi-t,..v„„,.,-.' ...Ari,,,5-34.7”.4E..,g%,,, e1.,,k-1,r4,',: ''.:',,:, S'...!'i$Z-41.-',-4 "-iff.; --',?'"ilit::4767 :A.Z..V4- , „.•.,"kri..,- la','4". . ^,14 ,-,',"cte-V14-ANtittit` ."1 •.`1.-51,...."4 kr-fig •17. vv..4 -4.it :-.-:4-,,' ...r.'..,1.4.i-,;-,...2.4*--4'41:-.4- ....,, ,'".. .;,--;- .4.-,..„...0-4A4.N)...t , --,4,-,:%q",fri...4:, i-ti,',..... - N.tv%...1.-Ir.;.:.",,,,,.: ..';'4:':,'..5.tata•'?„..i1 ,7..ttes-21:k•Ar-rri.PY.#4,1,--?-.9k,',;54. ',.. •V45'4::,`Ii'7t5';';;-AFF.:1:.T."-iF•44•:F.' .t. •••.qt,:'0-*--'''F .,' 4'"?•,-.1`.1,•,,,,-",'-`.. ,-:,-.•F:-.,1.1.4e,rriF.4,4-$!*':4,-i1:4-1:A41,17r.i.ir.r..... . ,f71. :.:1..V.,;,•• i-•n •-•'•-; .....''',.'"..;:7,.",,;,....:". ,fr,*,.; ......,..,,,,.., ,....4.vre,.zal,c.,T, •,.•„..,.,..v--.,,,it.• ,„,,z'ri::11:'4-rititAi.ike,"$-V,,iFFN•-'..g.:4!,'-1,,i!;!--::.:.•LX015.i■•'''..:1' F- .4'.'1..,1-4,'....7.45"-4'14-4 ..--,4-•••r*X;..z.:7Z.t-,:id .',. -::-F•t•71-4'....,Ler„rrtkli,- ;"'',:•W4"7-,Trns3Tivilt,F ..r.7rf,V751+_,C,I.ftg•47.1-f,:tz-,WIfv,":',e.'4-73..if;?-13-,„=,,,!•'21-4,.K..,.1.3„:re„,•,,r,,,,,g.,:;;;S:p•Vt.:', .4-1.;,_, .1,4 . ":•,',..-i,./..4,,k'F'4,,-;•,?...;-',4,44:,),-.4.-"Z,,Gu'i:4LE.-moz,',e.W,2%.4.:4P...,,,z-•,:,...4. .-gt ,:,!,..4.47,00";•:-.44,1.,.i.',•41L-•.V, L' Z:•.1.,-,i. -•. * ;=!.c"et.:•76",e4;,•?:.•V,ZitC2e. r•S.'.W_C!.'itftr;T.T.,A•74;*;- .:7'''.:-N7l.r41t)C71;;* '''''''r'',t4nt''''V?"C"„,",„N671'''''4".'", '''`'"' "Vii '''''''''''.7.".•' Fr'l.":".'##-"W' ...;,•./.'1'''"."*".4..'''•;:ii.-'4:•^, 1,..,Q,.-M......5:1".../. , , 1•:U ."4:,.:'..,.....• '... ..0A,A, ./.0*".t.', '``,. ' ,, ,•*."..7:1'**.'1.'''"7* '"::•••■• "•'"-''#**•"-",•-.T.- 1 .., ^:".3......;-1_, .••...-, ...„....f..'.:- ...;w•Csr.4,4.4.;:,."`Ci„.1547;',/ ...e..tir.q' ; *'24:t'ac'A..t.•,.".? ..,„3.fer4-7,•/:. .44 niii../,00"..1/rZ,.**- :-.T.,;(35-se"-yve'.;•%.*: .,,,,,,,.„:„„g„+,.,,.... ,.;,..,.,.,..r....,..i.42.,!.4,•,..:(s47.:•en••,4„..,,14,;.i.,/,4„.•,..:•.far.•,,t.., e4,,,...:;;,;re,,,,,,71:V't-.,44.,7.7;,t- Irt.:',",:,11414::il'_,N.2,;',:tr,A'''.•••44;"..4/.,,•-.7,tfy-g4".V:i*'!.14A:-::‘__,.,•.,.`W.,,,,'e'trPt,,#-,A7At''Vq-r2, -..'7,t•cre-.: •;:•.v Nrz..7..:3:::ggr,s3,--, 6A.,7,441.1-41,,,,,c1,v4-,,,,,,;..r.;::::;55.1-,-!;:±3-...k....;.--,-....7-ir-4„;?,-,, ,,r;p.41.1r.';:,,,----v-4,-?L......,--.,:1,-.,....o:.--:.- - -r.- -.1;-s•4t.);;---;,--1--4- ,„.'5,tts:44.=:',.,zz-s-k-4---:-.4,,.A.--,4-4v ,_11-,,-.1.„. ....,:,?::).,:-•ent-&-„, ,I.-rf-4-:1-../-.. :,.7,:',I;;;;:rt.„„;.::,,f,:.. 1„1,,,.,....',,,,;,,VA-,.;'.';',..;.,',vi'..:*1:1, C4,; :/..:74'"?`.11,,"-"tr.•:+-V;._',:,:-:7;',4 0::;!.(5..*:::q...,'7%'.,‘,"Sfr,7.;:,.3 L:',....s,P,,f4:0,v"vj.",-,L,_....T+" ,,.=:.5kk''.q....4t-,:-..",",.1--ir.o'.4`,' -,-•i..,....-' -,c'-',-,Y*--t•-•,--,:.-‘4.,3 7 .';'- ........:4*,... .„,„tt.,:4..„1,:.F„. ,...,)!;;;.r,F.,0,,j2;',•.?:7,-FiJN.Z.t.,f):t-,i.Fr# f,... ,,f/Ist'-'!"„;'2,,t,.,..,......,..F.-"'..f.'---.*:_•,.',4-'s.-Azr„ '..',. .tr•,'-:•'.,, F'r--liF.7,:Fr. ,...._ 1,-:',..--,..3:•::....,,-,--,74.:•.e.FFA".F7:-:";•:-"',"47ct'r,',3,':-.''‘,FiI:Lordrit"--''-'-:t_•s.":71,*4''''''.46-0.:1";F:-.‘" _ ,r,1-'-' ,-' .F'-•'•;:-- .:"..:,..:: ;.g.,,......-.,r,„:,,....,..F.-..4F,4r4.....ir,7-. .". -.2,...:::.7z.:.r.;;•.,:::::; .;';•...:•,.-4,•.• ..,;.J.,,F,;••?-F.-:t,:;•;;,?-1,;y9..7A,..ei-•-wIt.„,z,F1.,,,,,..: .:-;:!..4;..t.f.3N,....z.'-21-4.:::..•,e••,..1..i...,t4i.„.„-:Fe'.:K...s.fos.;..i..,..4,,,,:....a.i.1.1, • J-',..:;;.;-,7-1,143.•:"-:-..-?..•;._ .,..,.-,t•-.v.t.4...Y:7...-..t---....*:',•.••' -.7,t-A7......,.,,,.;,.-,c::.•., :,;;',`‘a.;..-ei•*,-,t..:,../...::•*e..4,•,‘•. .:,2;.•:tf- .:-. ',-,-..:-..'i.::;,',-,...-• : :'3,',7:',-t:"..4t,sn' '..k-:-1.7'.7..'dn'';::::,-'-':.'",t-"`.:1,,,--..*".1":.;;,".""•..".'''--•''4`1-'.i.'"';'," .:•,;:::'..,t44-1?;* '..7:i1-•i".74.t.'"?!.;--!," /".`;'''• It'cl•-• .• 4-,.,. • .,..=,‘• . • , - • .. ;zi,....1.-.:- . ,• ..,•1_,,I. • „.J.-, -, ,•.-4.....;,:Y:***--::....sq..-4..`-ki:v,.4.-.4-....s.',4V:----' -'--.'-‘.1. . '•:•,.:,,t.i.%,**,1,,...,4/-`7.•.--.:-..',..2.,.....,-;•44....' Ty,'„';•;:i.3.30,-,2'..";, . ... •. . --...-'4'.«:".',A* -;--,.-,--;r .i., '..."-,:....••-----,z-:.-..iist-4:.t.,;11. 1•1-,,,,,,7,•,e.e.,5.1.,0.._'•••••''::,.,t ,-,i..,-4.f'../.ci`z:,;',:,..;.--,„-•'..,„„*_:-:.-,,,-Y7.: --. ."... .:-'t.• *..,.., ,,,,,,,v.44,...s.v<7,yrZ1,. ,:.,...:,,S...;: ,;,-,,,,:•: V.grEV.Irg12..,:ei.,::,.j...:,v;j•''..,i,-,..SI:faleitivr.'"4,.±ft7,-ff,":4‘3,X0W.,,:,7:s,itY*-Vid-,^_.,..-M4'1,..:L^^41,'Vli.,V.;4".'•,4''..dv:,-:,"1,6: 4.- tecejv."4"„e”.. ""r:g;:.:.6.*?i,Vi4.44a1.41C4'aii..,r 3.'8....4.4r '-r.'K-"' "..;""/="1,:r..1.4"1":7-.;P"'?":• '...441`.:Oliv.A'i. '-'01;.:;i4. •':•1-'1'e''''!clf".7.5:Atf'aq`Fe5-1-":%"'",•i'rts""*.':1V1''''"f-k7.4V-111,1T4'..'"' •'2';7.',.".te7.:41•,.•a4,i4;,,,7,i• j'*-4!;?...ti.*:',14,,•7-2.,Viy..4:44••••;.,re:,•=T,... •..,•;.'!'•"-'1t171.:„,,..:;:" ...'..f..., ' • •''. '-•::.-:.':-:7^.. ..,!:- .••' "!'!•••••4:*... ,'-",',.. •.'!,......',1*.t,.frli...-AF•44:::•:.-1.,,T,/,P,•6:,...,..:ri-rl'i•-!..t...:_?'.1.1.;‘,F•••;.-e.--•:*.-_,f,,,:::: • ..tsc...! '7•.?"..,'-'4...^'.-;-',',1"../ ...''''''''2^' ''''' .-•:-.471-. ..Z........,-L.;- -•,..,I.:cz..,•-•%,,....:7/-,ic,..:;:e4i.1.474,ttli•••,••..e,,z.:-;:ryWc.-,1%•,.a.:17-til.ttt's,r1r4VZ•t:,r0`.4.,1%.,i;,- ,.••:' :.,', ;.4.1...:. ..,,k5,•a.roits-t;.:tw,_i,..3:jif,e,%,;,.^54,..,;,,t;.=.,14-1■4.-•:":-* ..11;:i'AtAtr.bi:r.',P21;,:k4t,,,,-.2":;*.'",,..k,tglp;,' *,..3i7,4t-i0W4"..4:g.tr,t,-„,....63;4:4r-V47ir.„,_..itt.r;',..Zr.,"':::,!,.4.r" '''W„._374•?_,,R1-",‹11::. AQF ..,-..:. etiOli. ;T:11,-44 14:1 •V:41„•,t,-1.044''4.; ...A •:*;:tIler',,41/3.';:,•7".741*". t:.::',,i.V1t,V''.X.490"-,41‘,A7-;t1'5'4.?fr741Y- f".--',4;-`•*. Z•2`"-P3. :;...13 : '°',,.'.7r;"..P..t'' ''' ''''';". '*•'''.54‘.;,•44,•••MI,s‘ -1,4•./,ft,1.".c.;..."-1,40.1,,,,ft,,,,, C,..e.:,):.4.'-',.`be:...4.A.,14: ..,,,,,it t.,-,,,,t,ift ..- •-,...,4.,-,..4. .,.,44.,-1:-,,y..:.,....,,`:!; ,7,.;,..:.,'i...,,,,,%.,.1.4.,,t,4,....."4.*,,,,;,„.,.tri,',V.:;t; Y:T3'''' '`''.• .44' r. '"1".'''''''' ••,..='.7 : .. -•'• '';-, i''.- ''''' •'•-F. -.'•:4.,71,,•P'.....,,A.r....'t*"..e..;,.:Ig•-„.-4,:.r... i+:.:-`.4.-',z1.0'.;till•;a:12,11.,:q-i•;:".41:4.1:::,-4.0...,4,';'/ILATE.:. ..5:1,11•01.,.. . -....).:c.-r,14-bis,,, ,l, ,;..z,:tit.,,',:z11-1,.14 -'(-,.---4.4toss,,t-'0.P:e',:',4i.:e'F'-..,-4i,5",::,4.,'-ity- ,.4ftg.',4r.,,,,,31P41/NA"It;"TO4w-.44=41goirtfa21,7•404-V..1-11"?'-7ftg-91ka>.--", -„,F.3:,..,„1-,,,: w.:..,.....;f1A,,,,a... .t.1.,. ..a,f.:)-,-.1,.,,,-.Aap.a.%.,,,. --,,,A.3.14-:;,---,,A:r- 1,c,_ .1.,/,,-,ti-„,r4.3,%.:,>FZ•4:„ .....9,...1`..%.:...-...,X4:44':•"•:'r.•,••' ,.:-.• *•■4•:-.*• i'--,,,*,,,%:,... -,:,*,.:-•:•,.: 4-: v-.,:-,%,.x.:.- 1,4" ,.:LItt'liKrzr-4,07.4Ftt,4;;;,.,:r..4.7iP,•;..r.A-74',,•-9.-.4......"0.--*,:ei.sttn:••••11../.....„4. A"'..%.• , ..,- ,.. . ..,.,„.... i..,_.., • Kt...,..,''.y,,....,....e...I i'ar,111}44-.1%.."PV.- ,.• ""/•.•'''".- ,•• .,.....%., ,0..., .„ , .;. .1, 4.„ R , . :■/. .x•••,N.z..r V.,.. rt.„_•,, ,s,.,.,..., ,,,,,,.),-, , ,„„ •,..,-= .. n.Ntlitc.,,, sv;•.1/4‘,..r..,1-1.-Vk":„_-- ref.7.7-t,••-••,."%a ti.".1.n...5.0%--:,°,%:.7.5..,..10,,,,,,Fr-4.--,-,, ,-• ,.,-..,:,.,-. ; •- -,..,..y„„,-;p,,,,,„4,e-,:,,,,,,,,,,,, p1.4,..,4-;-,.,....cr.-10.),..-iqt.-...,.,..-..e.,_.-Arle."0,I.A... .....5p.y.,,,K,-, .4.rpc;-.1,1,..I.,,,4,4•,--,01 ...:•.4.•.,-,..-...,%------ • -....:;;;:-...).1:77.-"A,A.,r.,..1 .,..f.,„!-.4:1••,. t..- ..f,...v.,1/47,.F. v„_9,,,,,„-.1t7....a.v.-4 .-. .;.•••,,.,0t,.....e,....,:.,--,..• 4.;F:1•4•!,....le 01:1.,..._ .1.4....L........: '.--.%'.41F.:,...._`..-.F.P.!::,. ••■••1,4F.V,.r--.1F214N .....•,...4-e7-,-.F:74,--,-ir:.•.n.-,..1F.t.- „:.::.,•....v.-F.,..,.:.4.-e.e ..,- • - :-..:''..:24,,:;?.g::i-.2tir3.■ :,‘t.1...•.1.••,,,i.--t-,....K.-. ....... . , . . • . . . . • • - . , ,:',4, p - . . t '''' ' * “4'1'..''' ' 023 1 . '-'''.'.''j!'1:..1. .— I ....-,. . .„„.: „ : ; :., :...::, •'"'7 : ".''":::..,';',-.7. :,-,•:,'''.,;•;.*::,".1.',:•:-',.;-X.i•::•:'. - .. . ,. . „ ,, „, „,.. .„...„.•.•• .-• , - , '• .• -... :. . , ^ : . - • • ' ' ' " ' -•.'.:'=1,.,;,.. ..! . . . . . " . • . ' . • , „ ,, . , .- '' ' ' " ' ' • ' ' - . • : . . . . • .. . . ... . . , . .. . . . . : . • - • . . . ' .. ,. ... ' . --• [..' : ' • . „ - . . . .. . , . a, IT . . ' :„......,..e ' • -D Att;o01 C . 15-i• • ...44......4.:„...- ,..P , „.... wetegeoe,...... .6,4,:t.„.7.15._, _ _ ..._._...: ...„,,:., . .. : . , . . . . . . _. ..... . . „ , _. . „.. . ., . .... . . . . . - .. . ., . , .. . . • : ,.. ..., . , .. i .. • ... , . . , . . . . . . _ . . . . .„. . . ... .. . , . .• . . . . ..,. .... .._ , . . _ . . .. .. . . , . . : .. . . : _ _________________ ... . , _ .. 7 y.?. ,;!.r.”:'.,`;.....'l',.,'....:r. ''''7'.-' L .4- ':.''' ' ''''.''' '•' ,"' • •.. • ; ....•„;,•.4.,..••42- -",.••••-••';''''' •••••,•-:•;•:•4 --—7.-:":•:•-:•--- "' -" ;,'"5--r.,---. . .. • • '.,....- .','%.:.'. !... ..., •. .•, •,.----.7.7,--,.r::-.77;r 77:,,,....,,,;, •--,-;'''.;-..t...';*77 ',..---.••••.•••''''• ..-'5....:: ,,;:',:',-,`',,,--7, .._'..1 j:'.•;:''''':7,:'..,'*-1*---'.,.,..",...'-'.'••;';..',..:'-;::''''':.'.•:':‘2.•"-'`''''•";•:,'''.-7:-;:',..'...:-.;.'....:,'... ...: ',::.-::.''r 2.'i■'':...7.1:,''''': '''.;".V;•';:i4' ... ;:4..;:.,.., ',.;,:.4.. ,...74:7: .,;4:'.44;4;:':/:Z.4 41.',,,, ,r,:4.:*....;t4:4:.4:F,,4:',,t Lj;.‘'r.`4,:1.,4 f4'fi.:j'y./.:1';'4,.;:j4„4' :':14''‘'..''...:■■•.,'.":'.....!.'i''''''.'..".'...1"1.';''''..'t 1.'. ..'+:':,.''''..::':4'.4'''''''i 24:,;..,....'4;t:7'...:.'J..;:'''''''':::.*:.!''', .•:... '.::*''''','::'''''4''?':'":,:■;;4::.:.'4',''::::' 44 . ' '.....':''.43:::'.V.i:.-..",".;:':::i'.'Z'i.:K.:°:::"',.1',:'..-',:.:!F......?;.;';-:-.:-A5[4:'1"1.."-.-7;:.:5'.- :_4.-',It', '',1' ..::.' .:li.:.-:;Y''.-. ."'.;.,..:!'..:',.'.-'.'-:-... -:.",.":::. ...:..".,,.../,.'......".::,,'-..,,:,....,..`'''.F:`.7.7.4••-'",---"'•,."._,. T1 • ',,' `"..s `kf,t.:-IALL:'' -.-.' ,..t•,,,'•!,, ', ',,,•7...',,,,.•.;•-5,.,-,•-,,,i,,:' •.,,,- .,..,:',.72; '.';7•:',....".. -,', ., . ,..,.••,-,''.,,.. ;1%, •,,• ;.'....,'',• .' :.:,,,,,:.• •. -,,,,,•••••••:',....',•• . ... , . . . '.', . :. --...,../,'',1.;.-. ','„.'''•':. •'': '•7.•i;t'''":''.''''-.::. ,':- '''' .:*L.,_.-',.::.''.. .2::: ''-'7'''.'......:—':' .=.:4::4:4-4•'-::-.:LE:....:' @ :,.,;•:.,...''..,.. ....1 cs.:;tl':•,1.:•',,'•:';..;.7-;',••;.!i.S,''.'..''-...r.1 l'.,2.`;'', :'..;'',.."2';.',/. 1,, ,';',., ",'..,".',..:"-,•7.,,,•."J:'",,..;.'..',.'...,7y,,•,... ::ii-.-.'' .''...:::':::', •'.',"'.,-..,7-',,1.,.,..,..'•.: ' •• '''. ■•••:-.4 • • -..'L;.:. .•,,,-f•,,....,4;:,!..„`.:....1 4'-'',". ....:...;-. .:'.".....1::-'•t.':■:;';'`„A.7'..:•■;-::;".r....1...".'i:-.,-,---....:::-,'-.•:.',---- -'---:7--'-••:..- -'......;.- .- -,---.,..:___-2„,--.•-..,....,.-....2:-,,---'.•":-2,--..4:.....,, , • •_ -- ,- ---,:---;,---,• '4-,--:' -.-';--4-....•-,,-.'-:-. .."...."..'.."''., '.....-,.'....tt-,-'37---7--,-.,%-.. .-:.. . -, .,. -...-:•,. ----:,-,,,,--.:-.,-7,- -.,',.;--",-: -.:-- ',-.-. ":',--.:* '.. . '- : -' ;•'t• '' ';• ',.•• -• •.••- ' - , . , . %.,••,''..•...,-.'-,‘'.;;-:•.'.:.:,-•:'-:1;':;::.:.::',.'*".t'.''.4 .''''';'4.i?1•'-:':i':'.'',i;'7''.,..;,.'',.-;r.';_'!7.),4..'.".:.'4..-.E!.''t.''','•'','''''.'''',-','.'..'."'6'".T;'''.'-.V,;.;1;„.-,:I..Z:-...,.::i7,6;,.;',...,?1..'.,,,;','.1.1.',.;;::.t.'/..,..-:‘7,'3,:,..::'',,-":4'''',',7,:'.i'.',f'"-,.7.t„,-:ri-'',i'' :"t',-.??:":l-;,i!.E.t-•.?fe.,7''...•,:■'•*-'.'.::....- 1-r.:"r".-..'.1.'.r,7,,-:',7:.!,..:-'.-:;,•'•:7,..-....,;..,7;••.,.•-..-'-':—.'-,'.,•.':::t-.'::'7--'•,••,•'•-,:4•:.•.'-4!'•'..--..;..0,.U.,'"..'...-,..,..,:.7:,..-',?..-:.-:';::...--i..•,.;..-.r,:'.;..-..'...7:.,.''.;.:..."-':.,7.-r'..'-47".'--•i....„...;.'.....,'-..:!ie:;,';.,:..,..:.'...'„...,:'•,;:„',...".-.:"-.t.r-.;,.-i..;.!.-.!,,...:.-I4,..,:-.-,7-:4„:-.,-./„..;.:.-.r.::,;"„i:-;,..,`,,:.'...'..;.4..'-.,-,';,:;,.,•!.i....c.-;-.-„.,:.r„.-,.„.":1..Y'.,.r--.-...,.-;-:;:-„'i.-:.-.-%'-'-.—.''.,',:.'.::."`....:,r:,'.:*'-:,-:.,r"-:..f.;.:...-,:.k:,-,',..:....,/.:-,--,r,,,r.,`.i.'.'.:..:''.'.'i-..—...' - : r,-..:•.':',:4,:-.;.`,r-„;-,-.,...."„-,`.“-I.f1,.-',...„.-'.,;..,‘.,•-,.*.,:-i::--i:,;'.,,.,`,....r17-,:--,.,,.,',-r,r-.-,i--,7.,_--'z.:..,.--r.t--„ .-- ( . -.,-•:,,,,z.--..--z, 7. ,..., .'...-....,f.,',....: 1.4'.,f,s,..".;;;;;.- F4...„e..,..,:e":,..'„.,...•,:-.... .1170,"4::-11;:..4.-P7'.;.,.7..7.,.::::.:.,..,....1....-...-,,..,...:.:,-..;: ''.:.•::::.:•..."-•'.-.!..r.1..•:''.,-„•..,..,•,.;,•••.-..,.....: ..,:;.,»...•....:::-;.1.'`,..••• •:',••••••,..-.•.;••••-•', -7--.-••••71•-n--....,,..,...•... .•• -•.,;<•..4..•,..:1*:-.,-Y%44- "r;.•'••-'•t•••'1Z..4.:'''•.;?";,..,••:.-..,!..,',.',.,:.',.,',.,-,,,,3k.•yr:-L'•••,:•,:-.•.•?..-,-•-.•..., •;•''..,•••••11••:•;•,.•••••■!••••••••"..g.'i 4'.'-'7.1.'s.',.',',';','-'- , ...;r:'0. ,';'''', .. . .*.r'T.: .i%.;--,,.::r:,rr,r1-1,---".::-..,,,, '. .70,,`, -.7;':,rE`3'4,".?...i.....' 4.1'.4-r3,,,.:,:=`';',. ',:r.;--',7':-....",-' :-,t' ,-e.,,:•:.t, .... :•,•.--+:;:•s'••.,._. .i.-...-,- -;:'..,-,,..;, • ,..... )-:.:,...,.:-.;, -.--...,• .7.:-,..,,-).5,--e.%-.--4:',-- :....:::.i-,...f.-str-,l',.-•,.•' .•:-:,"',;'kri.:•••,,,,i44.-.:1,.:•■•„•44;r11:-....t.T4p..7-.•..^,.-"?..7.7;•:.7''..,.'';.:::1-...,;'1'p ,,,E.,,.!.=10!"'...`-T ."0... ":7:.--'.:',.`::...: -;,.. .- ,;,.., r.....%-...:%':7..,::',,,.:-..i...'.. .-,-.:- .T.r..,-;.i. .f.-q.,..;.::•-„2-z....,4,.:zr;;;;::.-;,.,, .".,..*,'.....v..- <';.: ,...;?!..t.,;.??.. 4A! 4..!!. .-..':1•A:•:■- '4'...;:v4.,'..4.,:4,:-.-i'i':i........,.:.Z. ' ;40.:4*,,f.."'}%,"-:.'..!.r;' ' •!.:.;•- ...i:; '-e:f,r...:.4.:.,.:0..r7:Z .':..52.-....t.:': !,;1,.,'.Z 7.;.7..•‘.„!j,.::::?:. -'',.;::.• F..... ., '•:.::':.:i fl::,;,!:,''■ ,-ttli.44.-44rixiIV't%4?.1Oit-;.V.1. 17;-'141,1d74.,4, e.;:',*.. .i4-:.;::;';,:....4471,11.--i7;7?"' " %:::WA-•''';'-ai.-''.1*-41;7;r-:1-Y.; :;"1:41.ii‘:....'4. .;.'-'3'..'! -S1.. f.24- --" V:.'!r;-C::' I :51....,rz.,6„...?„. ‘,..1..;.^;:-.. ...S.1v1v.,,,,,,t,.,r0.7.?..,5;'‘,1.... .. ,:,..4,,,,...!,!-.„,,,,,c.1:.,,,,,a,;:..........,..:,'",?;:i4:421i;:tik,,,,p,,..2,,^7441.,,.:1,74..,,....,--„,;t:;-....;;:::.!g++:•'4,,c,1"....:5;;;;.,.;;;tr;1.:,1,4,,iz.v■fqcx.,;'2,:t4.:$1.7.-!..:!. '..;;;!.:,';':11:74:....7741..;',.:-.;',..,,::!., j.":,,,,,:':'-,■,72■4■!,";.F.,37, .;e:-.:.■,.X.,,,ti$4,4i...4 ".441..,feetlfa,:s..„,'..t.t.-..1,1■.$.-4.-fc.^:::!Ayil..,'.`,1r%:''. i.7",i;i..1.:.!*,.:-:',!it..1",l'zlittA:1-4; r-Ir.',;e.;117^,';r=;"'Ll'il°.•4:4'.:-.C.•,--N!'-'"4'.''e„.,*;•.;;,.:.•,:,.:,i-,-::•,,,,,,i'!;.■,..,tf.':' .: ', .1.,...;.3..q.610,r,SA,.0.1..Z4z....6.;..tt,-. ',.."47..'S......,,..*,,-,1:,...P.4';■;.-",..;-..1.;.:.-''Ir..1`,. '--',.".....,%:"..;-'7^.:„....;.47.,:...:::,:7,',...,.:,.. .r.!, ._,;;;;,:.,4.,..'...,i,j3-,.4r.:1-...,,,:.,...,‘„A........--:.: -- --'-.' . '..,- , - . i•.'..;••—,.N'''',...2.'.:v.,7.z.'s-L.c4..zuv."-.i. ,!..t,14.,60.....iili:."...eF.,..'.47.-1,-.-4.447...q..,,i,v-..T4:frit.,::}it:.....,,e,..'.t.,:-;.....c..,^7...;,!..i.4*P.',;‘,...N.,..7%,.t...- ,,?,.ft..F..e.:,,..1 ,;','::,,,,oliiiy•,:-,;,...--A.•;:;,...,3 IL,:;.•.)...,,,,..„... ..'.,..:.F•-•.i.:,:•.}." ,.--,, .;..f;',1,),„;01';'4.. ..,....tfp...!t:,,,,,),,,,-,1,!..,....::,,,,,..-4...v:A...,,,,,,,- :x.....,,jr .,,,,: ‘..*,,,,•;;;•••tr r.,••••4-..•••;:x.....:•.,••,-,•••4.11.,;• -•-01.••,....,•,...4,5-1,-...,..-....-.•-•;*., •.-,L..,,K...e.•::...',...•■••-•/....I•r•- 'IP...,..-•••'•'1,.•-,-• •••'•••".•./?•,.. ,,....c.,,,U,. ..,,•.--q,.,-,7-,.,t,..4"..,14.dk.z.,..F.,•e2,4-A,r3.1,..,,,,,,e,.7$,:,. A en fq.,-,-;--..'"Ve"-#"..47.1';'";,4P,7..C.'"14"•i.. ... 01',.,.4 rt!,F:•,:t,,E: ','.4.•.!..'-'•:•'t 1,'. '*.714,,-,,•7,i.•.-c-A,•;,t.,,IP,i.:,-4,..•5;.-4...-- --1-0,,,,: ,..,-Lit,.47.1,..)-et•• k, .- r,...A.,. ,, - yt•g!,...,4,;,.,..,•,1 .,,u1.,,,, ..,..-„,,...7,,,,,,,,,....;,.,..-1,-..,4,,•.:,:,,,,...,,,...„7.„-:t.t...:-.,.‘..:-.....7:1,...;.--•.,•,,t7....1'.....,,re't„.,r•-',,,-,-.:-----..tY.---,,..,,,,...,A.i., '4...4'4. '.....:4•,..:' ZE,t',.',U.....V.'-'4,...7.,'4.14„:.4,:l...4,,,,,,rd,....',4,7:;',1-.)■;,•'..,..,,,',(441,,,,,I,..'-1....-i„,!,,,,:,'■."1...„..;',1,;:•,..1:Ek`,.;,:t:a.i,.....',.-CAS,...,.,...f.,';''..,,?.....4.,...-...,',1,1...,..f,-..,,-. .. .....,...„:,,...,,..,„1.4;1,,•.„'7 ,r-,.:,,,,',....!"... .,',-;...:.. .,. . 4 .t.k.. .". "'t''''-.--"1"?'";!,- k''..7.'.7:C7'. 7.:'''z""1:....•.:',.'".::".-,'S." :,•-.''.. „72. ,'. , .;,-;...,,.:,......,,..,,,-;-,..•:,%:;:,'„,.-. ' .,-..-.,-.......:.17r,Sn.7.-.;.*•.,41: ..'-' '','.:,:rr.::2•;'.7`....ti.*;,"....-,h;L:ri.i.r:7:•::...7',,i4,4,Z:ve,,ti";:A-:'•,::AS' ;4;-.S.*';:;' .4;/r1"-i. :'1;c7:: :j:Zlitt";:r ' .t. "41.4";.-' :freie ".-TiA.4.'1;*.';i.t.,Yt-r-41.--'''':;:ifr:;"'--'4.-74:''Crt:el"'I';4.1•I'Ji.:7:4;::"''A-74:1;4,1:;;Pil:71,71114.1rIr!: .:V4'D''''::',$:21.1"-;11W411'1:i'''''';''''''''''14--. 4)--;:'''':::}:".:t.''''''\1. -''''•-• - ::2;.?::;:...*r.7.1t.X.'..:21'zil,'?C'.4-:"‘A., Vi-n,;;;";P''.:::'i--.:',17';'-ir:''''W1,''`-'t.f."4:1.;..i:-3-eg:'3',. ..-'=1;51'74!":".:''r--t:4i'..^..F.',4'''''''''''''''-'1,:'rArS"---=''V '';'-'''''''''..`''''.';`;:f;,''...•- .1.''.'''':,,f''..".."7,11"...,1. :''''-.4,....7'::'."7.4.S.. & - '' : . ...-4-‘.;,‘•.:,4i.:. -r.;-=.,-;iir.17#7....':4'5'..77;731,."?''.4'.,7F-t.'.:7'1,:`,.?[..". .„":.:.;•=".:7;4' ,;14,,c1;;■P ..i:..i''';':r:2'•'. ;-4:* ...4::.1:';:L-7. f'::'JP.Ir... 1f: ,:: ,-;:,•;:.:-.:tf i',1"•`.;''''';'!"::=71:.^.=‘'..:„.' '^,•:',,,,:•:,,;(,;.:?..:.Z.t4 %141" 4F.:,..fi.-::.t,til-i •-'.7;.,52•-•,,144:2L,':?,.".. ..::.:••• ? '..7`,/,,....e,.":.-7:i.` :12."-!: '.i.•::-7.7•P4.'4"..'.1: '•':i-;',14.'k;': ,-,4":4':?•,"!'•:::•••;Vt.:';';»:.k.':i;i"..3:',...V1i •Srit'V--'',-7:7'.' ;'; ' ;::'5.' / 7,,,7 , .:1.. i..1'..:.ka'..'•,/,rKf!,' :414•1"i,5',74.,:?•:1:"..E.'-',7.V.`4iik•fSi"4:1"-...:! •IAt,'; •.• :,'.,!..;..;,•:..,;:c.,/ ,,!•:'7-' •.-•:: -1. ..:.t.., ,-...-,•-..• ;:,,,„,.......,.,,,.,..i... .,,c::.y..1..:,,..:;!,•:::.;,....,..,:::•:,,.,...,..,,......i.,,,,...,44,..t___.z.:...,..; ,,,... •:?•:...1".:=;.:.:':•P.,*:,;::. '.;-'-r.':•':,,'.?:-41t-'4:.!:;'ie-i3k:..Z*r•':"=:341:&*4.;=*I•''Q:.*i;'44'.'ili'-'t':i'Z•,lti;i:..;t.14.1;.I5,k."i"44,..Vil::i3•::'V•'?-.■;k'.."4...S, .?.:?:P-•' ''.1".=I'4:i'it,,,ii,„r2$:-4...i.717.;:r4.3-'?1•;1,`;'i":''.',, jf,..E.1..t.f:[iil.4'1!.':::, 2 rs7.7.i,,,,y,;,,,,e4:1,,,,tr,..;, 5,4,11.i.-1;gr,:y;:::;•-pi:::ii...;.:.:";;;;:e;',74;,%4;-,7-...4F2,4,!;•,-.;•!.i".;.5.!,Iti:•':.?,Y,..1.'4-',:1'..?.4".1,1';-,!?-.t;;;.'i.::"0-4:::-!.:43.;;',''is7'.7;71:', 11::Fii,S!',„, „ . ,...,...7„,••?!....:174°.:47;c4:*"... . r,•1•1:7;7.,e,t...1:••,'!1,71-1-ti-%-,:;!,:...;;;T.,.....f..-2-7.1.,..z.,-.':.4,... . •!ir4z,,,,74i.,•-;;;;";`.',..,',..„,"..":!;,,Z.t.:" .;;;,=',11.•;...:;,:r:1:.".•;,-•,,;,,:l...,,,•;:.•::;:r%• ,..,=•-.L.--.-....„..,--4.,, ,,ti.r.,-7.,...•;.-7,-.4•1;:.4-.,,,,' •.,.• - .c.,;!.:;•.1- -A$ -04...,,-,;;-.7, 3,...-ii,..?.ii,.,4:1,.;;?.4,x:-17;4.,,,,g,,,:.-v:',:t7p.N.,-,t-li....:vt......,t',..:,,,,,4..ttif,c1,5=1.A.1;.-ri-i,;:::;;:c:2,,,,?:,.-1-7.1,14-,tfr,i.:--:_,,,,, ;.....,..f:?-i, ,,,t*';7T4tV .'•;.i'it::•;:••,..fent,,y,i.t.,-..q.,:tatit3-2;ti.• .......4.. .. .;,.-1.1%1.iVa...!'.'5,,',....ft-,,,..t.r.2 j■-fe..-,,S.;2;',-'7N:.t.,•..',.,4. ,,,';,.1,••;.!,:i,,-'4, ,,i'$::t.t.o..-^ -''.'4,1';',..4.1"4`^erkli.74fi'.-..1.1-;:'re:..:1-*:.:4',..112VI:p3.1,;,';':', ,:,''''..,'.;.*:-.3....`,-",..;-`..45•14 Y-1,, -....1.ig.. ,;,,r1;,,i,f- ,"-....,.. ...P..? .,. , .'.,-••-•-:4-7-.7,r.!..7,-..5,.-.„;.1;:4:4.-,-,:s■:-i1J::..,•:.,.••••.ar,.•••-f6-2't,L-4._MT1,4r-')'.•.4.:%•••:'••%•:;''-;;;,*-,4•••••.74'•-','.••.' • .-'-'•••••'''n--''''T'P'-. •• -L'''''''''•Y?), . '7'...• -'-'....'-'•-•.', .,',- -:--•.•..;..--•- '•.,„-.,..,... t•-'•,7,•'...e.11•%'7,-1..‘'.-41-'-'-'..--',.?.i.:-.A.... '-'-'''''" ''';".`''Th.: ''.11'.1. f...,,smI:7:' •`"S-Yl.r..4r.'':14%,&V'LF',:rt777Ci...4r4t1..,.'1.'*,..ti-...,''''',.;:.:V, .)"2,41',•:,'4'.-."-. :,-` ..T.,‘?,;^&-.1:.:L,.--7,*-,.::-K.,...-VZ:';','t-•;...,..""c:',.'"''',',;- ".0.1......,';,i-IP,,,l'ilf .,1”..k-,%.,L-?;..-.■■'-,'-:..,.r,"-,".:7-'7' . ;'::t...,7•-,: , ..--".%,, :)4,. Ar,,' "•..vt. w!r1,-:...tie;.■-1`..,:.-1,}Tir.":,',/,'1,7.:•'-'f.,,.',:s.•,7:`„..,1",,:',',.:::.-.,....1:7",k,, ....0;';'.'.:07:::-';'"'--:-.r'A.,:.•."-r,'-.,-'-4..4 -,-,.'''-'-.;.-*1.,.!^:`,At•..1,:4...: • Isi."4-',-.4.=-..c..0.1,?:7=1,j'Il'gg:•'?'1.-:4V .1.,. . ;'• ••:,-.41 :•,4%;:r•:::-.4,:sq:.4.-:-?..4c.',.4',-,1•7::;:"J:5,:hts.:;'!..;.-;-;-1,1•!"--rif?,!=-•‘-',..4,'...i''..U.::,:-,:r,:$:-.--; ;;;':.„4„-•; .;:.,t..T..?'",'Y; j4......?? •fc.'.,,,.,•,,ii.l.. .•:::::: ,scz. . V7,:Jr!....i , ,..1 .,,,,k-tiV;;;,t..;,-,--::.-1:-.1>4-.. ,::)..,:,-.5.4....N.:6'...A'.;', ..•;'--.--4.'*--!:',-.:.....-''''•,"'" ',';•",..'" ,..1::•_-:*.:'.'.-.-;fs1,-'. '..*.'•::„ .1:-.-..*:,•;.-.,. .,7-,-.F. " " ''";-•-•-Z.,{,,-;:.:••••: r.'..7e:".-,..-7'7:i--C.:tv,f.L•q7:c.;ir.t vti".0.:".--:4'-i•i'4;:f,;.' ;',1;f.'4'..=":>:--,4;..4."-44:::...z,"-i-i..■::"•;;; ;.....;::- -.4.2. :::.'";;;,:,•,i''...:gr' ,,.- :j..,,v...7.,:_•:,,,-.1. ,.f-.q,....i,,s.s.,•:....1..5..,:' .r.,.-4.,;:i771,?" :.-.41r;;.?:>••.;',. :„~:::, ,•!.::•.7,4v.,...„tj9,4,...onit,. ••;..7,1::?,,t,a7„:.,,L ,,,I;;;?;r.,. .,. F,•;;;;.?if,,..zi.....o.d...:1,7.0•*..4-,;;;- ;-.-.: ....fi. •...t;i:..5- .-i,. %...;-..z ;;;;.7.1;;;;!..i.:,..1.-,-;; .. •;11. .y!t...1. ;..„:745 •:::"?..:-..47,',-;-:::"4-' ---4•,..,,,f!,..,,;.",:s...k.:=4-; ,:.' .','-re:,- "7.7.4t.4,,Ar.igi:lk:gr.1.,A..;,,t4.fi ,i,!;I:t,- ,i'n.tfP,:1:?1,--e:=3",,i't!'4.,.::;,::::--j,..;.::..,::i.A-"...1...-,;',1-1.:....:,.'-•;;.--..,:eiz.-...4...*::,.e.`,7•14:•-•,‘,.....T.,..,i-,,•P ,!•4-2),..:t:.::::,..;;;:z.: - ,...:,,:',.-',..:, ,1.'4:4-•.--".:,'..': ',..--1-'4-''..:::. -.....'-‹•,.:".',....'. ,•-.„-..-: 1. ...,7!.. . ,.. .,..,,:.......,., .:z,c..,..,...7.,...••.-,.,....,..,:::„.,:.::-:,.,),..,:-,;•-:‘,.....=::„.;....!.....,: ,•?,1,-„•r:.,,,.•::....z.,,,,-1..;,.... •,..• ,,,.-..., ,,,,, • •,.••••- ....,...4.,.....,*.'d,„:, -•of.-••...•,..C-r,,,%.1„ .,-..,,,;k.,...,..... ...,. .7.,..,, ...C.,,nr....1.,,.••.i..-.,•..r.4.. '.........,........ ,,,',:'! ,,,•............,1, ..... .,, •71, ,,.. .,,7••;,....-n-•••;,..,.,,,,,,,t7,--,,47.-. . ,./.1 el-t•— 5.24:4.'. 4-,,,t,:',4'..., , 4`.''''''.,-.44/...7.‘'4"....'..-......%'N....;:I-- .'...'.■,.,"74-'^-4.4...t'.,I.,..,7,„VOA,. 11,,4:..,:t.,:t,• 4.,.0. .-,...„ 4'4 44''''''4 .. ..,t,.....:1,...,,,i5,:lv,?i,?...”., ',„1..,;•3:..,-.4.,;..,ki.,,,„:•,;,-".. ..,1y.,,,r7,•••,,,- ;,,,,..,-...--Pr,::•.-,,c-‘217.-,i.-azt.......40,:1•,....-:::•-!lk.'•;--;•:,, ,4-...:-',-,:a7•77:.;•il'•?....4•,.:-..Y.5‘, --'-,•;.:-..,i',,..,'":. ..4:7.-4L:'-'s,,,,...•...•;,,•,..-.'-: ,..,, . , . ,,.:,: .1,,I,,f:;.•:,...... :l:i.i.,;•:...,,..,,,-,..,..,,,,,,,::,-,,f,-;t*,•.,:-.....:* -,.'.''.''',..-:;'..;:;„:.4.,!"..;;,..,,....,•,-7-',•', ..,-,;:.,it'.'••■,,:t...:,-.:-.::..t,r,,..„:„;.„1.,;-",,,,i",,•=•,,, ,,,,;.:.„::g 1,t;••4-".:,' •''..,--,"4;...•-•'H-137'j„7,7.-,:,;,1,•,,-;' •,rt, '-'h7,..%11:4,•:41,-,'Pt.... . •••.: ''',',V ,;.:;t,,-.%.,A.,:( 4:-.1..a)::',:t.,'i'.;;,•i'•I•zi.`,c;•'..t.`:":4.-it:„Ii!••&!.:.•:.H.--4-':- .:- ;kf4z,1-1"r-4..A-.;:::::Y.'-..*: •,•,--..,,,....i;:,...,.:4,4:: .•:;,:!....,;:,,;;It-„, ..t,:tfAr.„..,,,,V,44.,..,,Z..4,-,1.47'..i,,,,It"..4;i7Agi=it,•;,.... .-,w,s*t.:.:-,,a.,,t:,•,X,,:t'ft..1-, ..3., .,i)=-7 ,',!.',47,:f.t.:•,'-'4's.,',.:'4%,.:1:1-\.e.cispt......4,5.7.. ..',77-. ..:r.;.'07;;..L.-1,;,:"P`•,!-P`'t"-`;••=.„:‘ ' :=•'-'aiii'2:7,./.4'.•.A- ",,..3 e.'''{i,:ke!IN-,.1.A.,•+-z.N,.:,:=1.,,::,-,':0 -- 4.0.!:-.4.;',4", t,',$.:14',.7-t;.:.7.:•t•'....,.•-•;ziz....;:r..?i'.7",7'ic:..t'.-4,t',..1;-'1,?1,.1.,,,=-'., ,'4•1,:`,::',..or'st.'■71.' 1t'-4-...--.." ' '',4 's '' '*S'77.t:'-', '*'=.„,-... .J.t-- ,•,,..:4:::::-'"4'7,'fiel,t•r•'•:Prw-i-'i':-.51:0.Y.W4i4-...:::,;-,..i.c .,.,:l'.x.,.).71...1',...;„<e-.tri7i;;:!Ctr -4:-.:1.;': • ,.:- r,'..'::1;131..`,,,-“,/4„.,,.?.,4- jk-47...c,1,1... ":„..=•,,,glor16:414.e-1.4, :■.,,-_, . .•. .:„..;-, .:?... .., .3..:".,'",?::151+,,,-.??.f4ih'7,;,%-*„..... c,„. "?i,i,t.-;- ';' ..*,„.,,`.:(''17,-Ft-Ixol'il.,,!.,:f.:ri.'",;:....ti .:-:„--,--1,,.;;- r,!...;, .':•:-; ,-,.-:.; - --14.4P-,,...-t-N--T. -7-7,...r-4-*=t.:?..;-.7--;--4.1-, ' i- ' -;:,,..F.4).:11,4'.7--.o.A,M4',,..`----.;,-14:--..--er0,-. .-....;-0,1 -- .;-7-7.;?,-z...-41-: .,.-53,z.; -1:4; -z•4; 11.-.cli..,..?--;:- . .17,.4--ik....0-2-',P7- W:--:;.1."4 •-;-'-' .-74-1. ' vi-Nc-i'-'---:trA-, ,--'''-.:-..-,7-n,,,=-•*•,-. ..ki-,'€?';'4''''''r,i7s% - .-.'• ' ''''..":*.r't.."'''''"i` '.....„-:',.;...:14..,,.,,,'•,7;..,,, ._ ,, i, .,,,..17'..;:.4A ,-,-rr.„.:41'..7 ,:!•„4,^•;+.70.c.",,Z,4:,4"..,;«,F!.,,,-,i1174...r4",-;,v.`olv.Z.,,:...Vi;,. ,,',..e4,• ,VAt.;, ., ,7;,:,4.":,iy,i4„.....,tr.r.q....,,,,;1;4•;::: 7''i" 7t; ...r:e....I1*T 44,Y.X7fC,it n'C'r-litili.r:',7.,"'A,5 441* ..1'F,rgtk,'t;Z:;4'..e2-1;':',.:*:'•';;r..:5j:';.f.0.,"";::',ZIP,A::;"•"t;:'-.41:■::P,,,,,S.,;:5;Pi t,':,1:.?i;4;f Se C 7.Y.'.44t,..';7 f-,, „.:1;e:,:74' .: 1"tqc,i,Vit;thi ,.1.1.$-‘:V‘I'•:).-,i:t.',4.':; ' '„., -L';.,,,,',44,.,„...,,L1.,. „...,f,j,•„.,...•.,,,,1-5.1-r„,__,•704„,•>„)...,7,4,1c,,-.1:4,..,..,;:c..J.,.,..;;,•....1,• t.",--11,..v1;:r.A.,,,j, _ ,.. ..,- .. -2:7 _f...„,-t...-....„-..:;• .;41.,;;P,oro-,-..711 ,..!.e...:;;..170`,.1,;;;445. ,..,a,s•',•:, •:',...,_,'AV.:'t"..2.-7Pr-L-piv.ii'r: ,a....`41*>:•'"*.,,,1).01,' • ,'1"-14,1 II•V;A,zo .s,s....„,`P",?...1.7.,_,„1.04t•.-, -0.,,K.,sywrr.7...t..-40.-t:ef4:-!,11,11,*.s.7w,..3.!:,-0,;;..,-,....-Is-z-ter-,*.1.7.1.,tztc•X."0;.e,,,,1-,r.c,...,,,?Vi:J.,•••;',"..r-,..7...1....,z1Y.!.., •.....-tt.•..4-• .N..7-..",..J.?....0.%,..."...cin:,.:.4,,,,•..-7.Z.-.•f/.:^ •„, '.„''-',...1-t‘:/ft...t:,L.!k,'•'•e ",.6':',"`•'•'...''',1:•",',4*•• '--'44-?"•*,i''••l'Ar:."..,..i7k."-;.'s? -;'.'s:....,•,0.5"7.,.,',..---'. ''',•:...,;,:-...,..4._.....,,,, ,.tiv.c..-....2.c;.t.4.7.4,;,,, ,i.;:,;2:4;•„.c-,s;'.C."1,.,,:-t:',.••41,.4-t-,W•':-.:•?-;,,.-,05..:;,.t•-:•*...:4,:itt..-,g•.:',1:t. ...........4.,,,,,•.:4-...430‘;.7%. r.s,,i,.:1;',,,,F,1-7 ,:g,' ,'"'x'fr;-1:-44:.,1•1;"?:•;":1.1,i,,,,,••-it.. -5 .44.4l.',A,.7.1'x' -^'`'' "'''''. — ' ''''''•r'::".;:'..1-s.11<7":1;4".f.',7. •4",..i;-,ti-z•-•••-1,•••7-4,:z..7--..,.:-...,4,4- ,""A-Itrie -....iiir,,-ev,...,,,t54,1,R4,,„;;-,,,h4,1,;:ty,..-,;-71:,4,:e,t,to..,,•„......•;4........, .•——--- • • , ' ''''''":7''-'-e-"''r','-''' :','•.','•''' ''''''''0 4k,:.&•. •••:•••i•714•••:1•V•.k.••••••r.......- -.."., :..h...iP,••••.-•- ••• .• ‘- '•-:'.--:-.,..!--4-1.--Z••.Y.,i."'•• •I.,...L... ;...e..-st,... :...s.. . . M 024 �..._. _ _ x.. .M.,,w.�wF,�..ri.�w .s.i.aww�.:.Ji.....�..�_...w-,.a,r..v,�.r�.ww..,---s w..._..._..,.............._ ....–.._,...... ...,, . ... _ .. _...---_- tJ ••• .c EXHIBI A, P. 1 o- 1 0 R 1111 w "+ G r I ',.. Pt* \ 0 f' t 444. fC 4 t St f............Z..........1P,„..,...„.......,4 0 • A' i 64 11 441: ri 7.W .,...,07 ,. 4:3 RA . i c Pi Ei 43 $,,,c 0 X22 . E 1 C - [ VfI i s • E i L - I. ,,-,I/i ; , i 1 t il t7:'•-1:,, -7 - 7-' . 7'...e.:,.i',:•.;4elt.1,:t1.'i.;-.1'• ''s ;: ,:'....•,',ii,..7.-...'''i•;-*". .: :•- " . '" :..:.•.J!.'i.-,.',..:::::.:..-': ! . -, . . , . -::7,-',r. :-.--- i', : 1,:.":.'„.1'-','. .:.:.-r.:z.',"-:::..:.::.. ti , , •.-,1,,..,:7;•.•:;,,...'. • ' ",• '.....s...7...',,::".',..: --• . - 1-''.,-,,'!..- .7 . . .. •. . .:. . O2, - .. . .lie Ilit ., ■ 1 EXIIIBIT A, P. 2 . 1 . .. I .... ..,,,, t 1• ,,..... .%,,,t .. t::4,7) • . .ft Art I . . t, 1 li• e t 4 . ' 1 ' rt 1 1 'r,. IL' "I i ' e (---T---. - , • . , ..., . - fp I kl 4..„ , , I 'Iv& 1 + ; .- IC) v.t.it i . ;I ,..,...4..........6.C.j. ,, -...r.,:rm at .I! v. rf...--14 Tz. tt, IN% '`.!..\ "----..•--t-,„-.. .f: .A ,,..{2.) , .. ".4.4"4.44..-.4... _.,,,.. r.....,„„. ,-, I...4 -,, ..! ---,...." .. _ ... 5.A•IC ! 8 I a ..5. . I 0■15 e. 3 1 4 1 ... .. , ,...* . I .,0 .'. ,.....- 4, • 1 ,7 I — t.c— ...Vt 0 'Pr* b.--e'..>•„_s, . - . ...).1 114 11 ac ._ fli , i 1 \ • : ..' !if 1 • \ ,—,,- I'■'co o ' A`g_I_ : X.."' t.. ; . ........ t v , t , t .. , . . . . . ... .—....rait il .... t A ...: ... ......_,,/ . ., ,. r r .... fit • (;) • 026 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF ORANGE APPROACH ZONE EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE, made this the day of 19 by and between (hereinafter referred to as Grantor, and the BUCK MOUNTAIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a General Partnership of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter referrJd to as Grantee, W I T N E S S E T H: THAT WHEREAS, the said Grantor is of lawful age, legally capable of disposing of property, and is the owner of fee simple.title to that certain tract of land designated as Tract shown on Exhibit "A" dated the day of 1 19 2 which is attached hereto and made a part hereof and more particularly described as follows: and WHEREAS, said above-described land is free and clear of all leases, liens, mortgages, mechanics liens or any encumbrances of any nature whatsoeter except the following: and WHEREAS, the Buck, Mountain Development Corporation, whose address is 910 Airport Road, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514, of the County of Orange, and State of North Carolina, is the owner of the Midway Airport situated in the County of Orange and State of North Carolina. NOW, THEREFORE', FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of $10.00, and NORTHEN LITTLE other g(43d and valuable consideration paid by Grantee to Grantor, the , receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantor, for & BAGWELL himself) his heirs, successors, and assigns, hereby covenants and agrees ATTORNEYS AT LAW with the Grantee hereof that for the benefit of the public in its use of C31 W FRANKLIN ST thp cmiA a'";:,1 • 0 2 / -2- Tract which lies within the approach area of the (NorthYSouth) end of the Midway Airport runway (which area is identified on Exhibit "A") to a height above the approach surface for that approach area (as alb° identified on the said Exhibit "A"), said approach surface being an inclined plane with a slope of 201, i.e., one foot of elevation for each 20 feet of horizontal distance, located directly above the approach area, which inclined plane has an elevation of (mean sea level at its inner and lower edge along line AB as shown on Exhibit "A") and an elevation of feet (illean sea level) at its outer and upper edge along line CD as shown on said Ejatibit "A". 'THE GRANTOR, for himself, his heirs, successors and assigns does herebylgrant and convey unto the Grantee, its agents, servants, and employees a continuing right and easement to take any action necessary to prevent the erection or growth of any structure, tree or other object into the airspace above that part of the approach surface, above the above-described inclined plane located directly over Parcel , and to remove from such airspace, or mark or light as obstructions to air navigation any and all structures, trees or other objects that may extend above such approach surface, together with the right of ingress to, egress from and passage over the land of the Grantor for such purpose. Further, for the consideration as above set out, Grantor does hereby grant unto Grantee for the use and benefit of the public a right of flight for the passage of aircraft in the airspace above the said Tract in the approach surface above the inclined plane as above described and as shown on Exhibit "A", together with the right to cause in said airspace such noise as may be inherent in the operation of aircraft using said airspace for landing at, taking off from, or operating at the airport. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said easement and all rights appertaining thereto unto the GRANTEE, its successors and assigns forever with the understanding that these covenants and agreements shall be binding upon the heirs, administrators, executors, and assigns of Grantor, and that these covenants and agreements shall run with the land. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has set his hand and seal, this the I day of , 19 (SEAL) - (SEAL) NORTHEN, LITTLE & RAGWELL ATTORNEYS AT LAW 431 W FRANKLIN ST CHAPEL H1LL,N C 21514 ii • ;- ;". - , • ' , Q28 -3- STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT NOW, on this the day of , 19 , before me, a Notary Public in and for the above shown State and County, personally appeared known to me to be the same identical person who signed the above and foregoing instrument and in my presence executed the saMe and acknowledged to me that he had read the same and understood the contents thereof and that such execution was of his own free will and volition. 'Signed this the day of 1982. Notary Public My Commission Expires:. CONSENT AND JOINDER IN GRANT OF EASEMENT , being the holder of the liens or encumb9ances described in the above and foregoing instrument for and in consideration of one dollar and other good and valuable considerations do hereby join in and convey the interests in the premises as above set out and subordnate my rights and interests to those of the Grantee, Buck Mountain Development Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this consent and subordination and affix my hand and seal as of this day of ....., 19 . — ...(SEAL) (SEAL) _, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT NOW, on this the day of , 19 , before me, ._ , a Notary Public in and for the above shown State and County, personally appeared , personally known NORTHENLITTLE identified holder of an encumbrance to title, and in my presence signed the , & BAGWELL above Consent and Joinder aftr having read the same and haveing acknowledged ATTORNEYS Al LAW to me that he understood the contents thereof and that execution was of his own fHe will and volition. 431 W FRANKLIN ST Sivripri this the nc 11317') - �.r}.�y .�h� �k". .. :�'{;j �ti: ?'t•:$: 4^�f..G,".i.•.. . .. ���"u�},- jxr;lt vim L ..,.,... r�-',G y t 'yt ci,•wc< r}S` �., .S} ": rr L. s.A^t' "* 02 j . y .r. - - ' ':tiw. .: ? •r �' k't:i a.: .l.r .::+..._...+„... . _ 4 . J NORTHEN, LITTLE & BAGWELL ATTORNEYS AT LAW 431 W. FRANKLIN STREET JOHN A. NORTHE~,�J CHAPEL HILL N- C. 273t4 J. ANDERSON LITTLE P, O, BOX 207 0 KENNETH BAGWELL, JR. {9141 441-4136 CI4ARLES H. THIBAUT (919) 442 8321 September 15, 1982 • Emmett Cheek and Mary Sue M. Cheek Route 1 Chapel Rill, N.C. • Dear Mr. and Ms. Cheek: We represent the developers of Midway Airport, which has been approved for a Special Use Permit by the Orange County Board of Cortissioners provided certain conditions are met. One of the conditions which we are to endeavor to meet is to obtain air right easements over certain property located to the north and to the south of the runway location. Enclosed for your reference please find a copy lof a composite tax map, showing the nearest end of the runway and ehe overlap pf the approach zone area with reference to your parcel of property. Also enclosed is a sample form for the Approach Zone Easement, which we believe would meet the requirements of the Special Use Permit conditions, and which would basically restrict the height of objects built upon the ground within the approachr.zone area, at a slope of 20 to 1 from the end of the runway until a distance 5,000 feet away. As you look at the diagram, bear in mind thatian object 1,000 feet into the approach zone could be no higher than 50 feet, an object 2,000 feet into the approach zone could be no higher than 100 feet, an object 3,000 feet into the approach zon' . could be no higher than 155 feet, an object 4,000. feet into the approach zone could be no higher than 200 feet, and an object a full', 5,000 feet from the runway could be no higher than 250 feet. The easement would restrict the building of any structures to those height limitations, and would allow us to top any trees which would grow to a sufficient height to penetrate this imaginary slope surface as ndicated by the diagram. Please contact our office as soon as possible and advise us simply as toy whether you would be willing or unwilling to sign such an Approach Zone Easement, along the general lines of the sample contained with this package. Your attention to this request would be greatly appreciated, indicating your desires in this regard. . Sincerely, n - . -;•••.Z -•.„,;'''• ;:. . ■ • -• • • •••1-: • ,"712:".;IT; .;; ' `". -1;1; '•.11 4.A*...t;;;; t.1 0 0 7-11, • • • • : • • ;• , 1 Route 1, Box 161 Chapel Hill, N. C. , 27514 September 20, 1982 Narthen, Little & Bagwell Attorneys at Law 431 W.- Franklin Street Chapel Hill, N. C-t , 27514 Dear Sirs: In answer to your letter dated September 15, 1982 pertaining to air right easements over our property for Midway Airport, we are not willing to sign such an Approach Zone Easement. Sincerely yours, • • agar lit t nd Itk • • • ,• Mary Sue M. Cheek • 031 itoof.th. ........, ,k, • - - _ - ........ - 2, 14' .. k.. - • -_,. ... ,.,' '114-.411 .1 • - _'.. .. ., STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA 4 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P.O.BOX 25201 - JAMES B.HUNT,JR- RALEIGH 27611 DIVISiON OF AVIATION GOVERNOR I (919) 733-2491 _ I June 29, 1982 WILLIAM R.RCSERSON,JR SECRETARY ' --- - : . . %:,•,.-,, - 1 - _ , - Mr. Jim Polatty Orange County Planning Dept. 106 E. Margaret Lane - Hillsboroguh, NC 27278 . . .. . . . I . - . , . . Dear Mr. Polatty: In reference to our telephone conversation of June 25, I have discussed with FAA their requirements for ownership or control of the approach surfaces for runways. FAA advises that their guidance relative to ownership is contained in Part 152. 9 and 11) 152.11 of the Federal Air Regulations (copy enclosed) . The Wg. pertinent parts of these regulations are: 152. 9 (A) "Whenever funds are allocated . . . the Sponsor must own, acquire, or agree to acquire, runway clear zones. " (B) " . . . a runway clear zone is an area at ground • level that begins at each end, of the primary surface . . . and extends with the width of the - approach surface . . . to terminate directly . . . where the slope reaches a height of 50 feet above the runway end or 50 feet above the terrain. • • " 152..11(26 "In projects involving grants-in--aid . . . a Sponsor must own, acquire, or agree to acquire - property interest in clear zone areas . (B) "On new airports , the Sponsor must own, acquire, or agree to acquire . . . runway c:Lear zone areas • . . " (h) " . . . An airport owner is considered to have I .„...... -.4 ........,.-4..... Inv... .q....u. 4n4-..c.rocf if 1 i- has an clase- • , 151,3 - - Mr. Jim Polatty June 29, 19182 Page 2 1/44:i61 1 With respe t to obstructions in general we call your attention to Part 77.21 (c) of the Federal Air Regulations (copy- enclosed) which-' states: "the standards in this subpart apply to the effect of con- structit or alteration proposals upon an airport if, at the times of filing notice . . . (1) (the airport is) avail- - able ford public use and is listed in the Airport Directory. • • " After revieI lwing these regulations, it is my opinion that 1. The Irequirements for approach zone control and owner- ship are mandatory only for airports receiving federal aid funds. 2. Even for airports for which compliance is mandatory, the 'requirements extend only to the outer end of the cleair zone as defined in 152.9 (b) . 3. The 'requirement for reporting and review is applicable only on new construction or substantial alteration, - at the time of the construction. In conclusion, it appears that if Midway Airport were a federal aid airport, it would be required by statute to concern itself only with obstructions in the clear zone. It would, therefore, seem appropriate for Orange County to only require Midway Airport to have sufficient land interest in the areas defined, as "clear zone" . If I may be of further assistance, please let me know_ Sincerely, E Bruce E. Mathews Airport Development Specialist BEM/by r• ::.; .. , „ . , .• . I , ..,..4.:= ,„,-403:::6, . . - - ....- - AZ:-, . , _ „ . . . :- PT ' - - -;-a .,..,, • / . STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P.O. BOX 2501 . , .•, RALEIGH 27611 • JAMES B.HUNT,JR. DIVISION OF AVIATION GOVERNOR - L919/ 7332491 June 30,. 1982 . . W1LLJAM R.ROBERSON,JR. SECRETARY . . . - . . . . . .- . . . . . , . . . , . Mr. Jim Pollaty . . „ . Orange County Planning Dept. 106 .E. 14argaret Lane Hillsborough, NC Dear Mr. Pollaty: Per the request of Rick Cannity on June 29, I am pleased to provide the following information with respect to aircraft operations and ground traffic expected at the Midway Airport. 1 . ., , ,. . ,...?..- 0P.N .. AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS . . _ .., . The projection of aircraft operations is a, highly inexact art dependent upon a number of factors unique to each airport. FAA generality recommends consideration of 500 to 1000 annual operations liars operation is a takeoff or a landing) per aircraft permanently based at the airport, with an average of 750 used for preliminary review. This figure is inclusive of all operations 'including transient traffic. In North Carolina, we find that actual annual operations per based aircraft at the at public general aviation airports range from a low of 131 at Lexington to a high of 1737 at Wilson. The average is approximately 850 . Lee Mehler has indicated that he would use the current figure for Horace Williams Airport, which is 500 annual operations per based aircraft (25,000 operations 4. 50 based aircraft = 500) . Mr. Mehler believes the local airport use is indicative of future use of Midway Airport. I agree with him that a figure of 500 operations appears reasonable for planning use. wirrhwnv Traffic Generated: 034 - Mr. Jim p011aty • • June 30, 1982 Page 2 use two different figures depending upon their analysis of potential airport use. One figure is that each aircraft operation would generate 2.5 one-way highway trips. The other figure is that each based aircraft would generate 5. 8 daily one-way highway trips. Calculations for Midway Airport result in the folowing figures. A. Based on Operations 500 annual ops/based aircraft x 276 based aircraft 138,000 annual ops. ; 138,000 annual ops x 2.5 high- ay trips/op = 345,000 annual vehicle trips; 345,000 Annual vehicle trips 365 days = 945 vehicle trips 1 per day. B. Based on Based Aircraft - 276 based aircraft x 5. 8 highway trips = 1600 vehicle trips per day We understand that the Division of Highways is most comfortable with figures based upon annual operations. Thus , we tend to accept the 945 vehicle trips per day as being the most appropriat for this study. (4. This concludes our comments. Please advise if we can be of further aSsistance. Sincerely, Bruce E. Matthews Airport rovelopment Specialist cc: Mx. Fired Hazzard, Buck Mountain Developmeilt Co. Mr. H$ward Robinson, FAA Atlanta ADO . . ; •■•■■•■■1 [ - 3 .. \ ‘ 1 f_ -r.-- ...:r- c:"" , 0,3, 6 1._ _ 1 .., :,, — - — - - - ;i43''' — • .,— ,.:' :1' e *1 , i,-.4-- -17 '.. ''''."..r" .-"rou....0y. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P.O.BOX 25201 — .—RALEIGH 27611 -- - - - - - ---- -----. — JAMES B.HUNT,JFI. DIVISION OF AVIATION , GOVERNOR -19191 733-2491 — July 1, 1982 WILLIAM R.ROBERSON,JR. SECRETARY Mr. Jim Polatty Orange County Planning Dept. 106 E. Margaret Lane Hillsborough; N.C. 27278 Dear Mr. Polatty: t- . 1 It is our understanding that Orange County intends to require developers of privately owned airports in the County to own or control all of the land lying under the FAA-defined "approach zone". We believe that such a requirement is unreasonable and F-.; unfair to the private citizen who is using his own funds to provide vital air transportation access for the County. We are particularly concerned that the County may be going far beyond FAA 4.andards in its requirements for private airports. As Bruce Mathews pointed out in his letter of June 28, FAA requires ownership or control of only the clear zone. Any controls beypnd the clear zone normally takes the form of a height restriction zoning ordinance. Such an ordinance is clearly beyond the ability of a private citizen and should be a County responsibility. We recognize that Orange County shares our goals of the maximum possible operational safety for North Carolina' s airports, both public and I ivate. We encourage the County to develop a PI cooperative program with private airport owners to ensure safe facilities. Such a program would require the owner' s control of land underlying the clear zone, while a county zoning ordinance would provide protection against hazardous objects being erected or allowed - 4o grow beyond the clear zone. . We recognizJ the need for counties to develop and maintain adequate land use controls to benefit and protect the general '....' :i - . • • . , . . - ( - 036 ...-4,MI Pola.tty \ , ,,;:t".. -v-4.4, . • -.2,- July 1, 1982 1 ., .04:1-. ...,,,,..... u '',-.1,- ,T1,3-4,z-IFI • _,,F,, Page 2 \ .... ...... .... .... . — ----'..-:-.' . . t=444 We appreciate the interest of the Orange County planning " taft* ,, in using the resources of the Division of Aviation on this matter. .s. If we may be of further assistance, please let us know. ,-.,, Sincerely, RA" 44d1 - • Wi/lard G. P1 t lentl, Jr. , P.E. Director - -.-;.- ...,--, s•-,--` ,..., cc: Mr. Fred. Hazzard Mr. Howard Robinson .., - . ... 1 . i 1 - . 1 _ .. . . 03 / .... _ ... a to ) ' *k ..4....■ 3kARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION , RAL AVIATIDN ADMINISTRATION \\ AIRPOMS DISTRICT OFFiCZ , 1-44;--, 1568 Willinpj-mmaDrive, Suite C eli.f. „//' .• '',''' ' ... , ■Am College Park, GA 30337-1599 .'4...- Art .1_, -- " March 5, 1982 l. ‘ Ii: \''ffiStitl''.c. ------ ":1 ■'2 Mr. Jim Polatty ,i-- -- Planning Director Orange County 1 . .c.-...,-; 106 East Margaret Lane Hillsborough, Wirth Carolina 27278 •-_-:-:'.', Dear Mr. Polat4 "....- , Reference is made to your letter of March 2, 1982, regarding the - layout plan for Midway Airport and Airpark. - ,;>•.;.; We have reviewed the layout plan as you requested. Since there is no requirement that private airports be developed to meet FAA standards, we would not want our comments to have an adverse affect &I'l on the developm* of a private airport. The FAA standards are, of course, available for reference if a private developer desires to his facility to TnePt appropriate standards. The only requirement FAALhas regarding privately owned airports is that a Notice of Proposed Construction be filed with the FAA. This has been acemplished by the proponent. The result of the airspace ., determination isl shown on the enclosed letter of December 11, 1980. ' Af' The recently plahned 1400-foot extension for a total of 5000 feet . ,.. received a similar airport determdnation. The use of FAA design standards is required when the airport is , being constructed with federal aid. Simi1nrly, if an airport is constructed withlprivate funds and future plans include converting it , r to a publicly-owned facility, with the intent of obtaining future federal aid, it would be desirable to plan and construct it in Fi accordance with PM standards. If a proponent should ask our recommendations for development of a privately owned airport, we would recommend that the FAA standards be utilized. ,.. - 1 Our comments on the plan are as follows: 1, We agree with comments made by Mr. Bruce Matthews of the State of North Carolina,. in his letter of January 26, 1982. We would I L recommend that current standards for runway separation, etc. , be Itti , --, applied if possible, 0 . . 2. The report indicates FAA approved of the development, however, this only relates to airspace affects as shown in enclosed letter, -. -„.-.. 038 CC* 2 3. We recommend that the underground fuel farm be located in an area away from the runway. The tanks themselves would, of course, create no problem since they are underground, however, trucks parked in the area while refueling the tanks could create a safety problem. F . 4. We would iecapmend that an alternative location be planned for the access road to the airpa& development. The present proposal indicates the road ".v". .tely adjacent to the runway end. In . addition, adequate - should be given to providing proper clear zones to provide for unobstructed approaches. We would recommend that a 34:1 slope be planned. All roads should be at least 15 feet beneath the 34:1 slope. = We hope that the above coments are of assistance to you , . Sincerely, IRobinson Chief, North Carolina Section Enclosure LS . , . !' . • . . . . . . . . '....77,...'77'..' „ - . . . . . . . ... . . i ,::'---- ,...„., : .. .. 1t1.64,--.7:„..i.„ , :- Le-44.. g,,43x.....6---:-..----7--,-,........................._„ . AIRPORTS DISTRICT OFFICE ...; j l5GB Pill-Ingham Drive, Suite C .. College Park, GA. 30337 . . ...c,..........c., I Prro,Irtimmoh. . .. ..... ...... .. . Nr. Charlee Williams, Agent . Ruck-Nountiain. Development Co. ' 910.Airpor,t Road Chapel:Uill, NC 27514, . . , . . - .. : . . lz.AT NI ........ L., .. .. trornmorispa. . , i 1 , 1-'1. •, 7 Dear Ir. illi ams: . 1 . . . • . , - 4. ... t ,,T,...........0.• . Reference is-made to your submission of a notice of landing area r • proPoeal:dated 9/15/80. , It has been determined that the proposed . ',. vivrrom-isfsa. public us .Midway Airport,, to be located at latitude 35°56'20" , ' longitude] 79922'50"W, Chapel Hill illictlSysn , will not adversely 1 - affect the safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace 'by aircraft, 1 provided: ., ., . . . :. . . .........--.- RYIS.SY■I9 0 .. ..!,• All o 1 n peratios ar© conducted 4n VFR weather conditions. t . mmoo...p.....,i 1 I Please bd advised that the airport is near published IFR (IR-86) -- and VF R (liRr-1061) low level military training routes.. These routes OATIS . are generally used daily up to 3,000 feet AGL at speeds up to 450 , - • 1 CCM.SY m p r. : i . knots. -. ., : --. .. . , . . • • ' Unless elxtended, revised or'terminated, this determination expires- in two years if the landing area is not in operation by that time, ---- Please notify the Raleigh, North Carolina, Federal Aviation Admin- DAT= r tetrad* Flight Service Station and complete the enclosed pre- addressdd FAA Form 5010-5 and mail within 30 days after the facility RT.-f..Ta.I.• .1! becomes operational. .r,-,.....p... This determination should not be construed to mean FAA approval of the physical development involved in the proposal. It is only a DATe , determination with respect to the safe and efficient use of airspace by aircraft. In making this determination, the FAA has considered RTC-5Y41.. . matterslsuch as the effect the proposal would have on existing or ---. . contemplated traffic patterns of neighboring airports, the effects InIVIA4S1S it woul/1 have on the existing airspace structure and projected pro- grams of the FAA, and the effects that the existing or proposed man- made worn objects = tile with the FAA and natural Objects within the affectdd area would have on the airport proposal. This determination PTO-SY ; 1 in no way preempts or waives any ordinance, laws, or regulations of any other governmental body or agency. ...A...4 . 1. • . . . . . , . - . . . _ .- S ! : . . ,, .. ' , _ . . . ' •,:',. •,,, . . • . ,,.,,!...• .,.,:,, : . , ' , 1 0 4 1 .. . , ;7. ,.. .,. 4/11/78, I Appendi3 c 6 APPENDIX 6. RUNWAY CLEAR ZONE DIVENSIONAGS 15°/53°C1-4B-CHG .4.. -. 2 ---- L ----___ 2 ---",---11. .7.-;:. . Approach Surface "g "s---------- .47. --------:-- ' Surface -- .-------- a ....--- -- -... .'.. Runway Clear W V 2 Zone wi 2 w 3 ..t.' .'. ■ 14 ',I:: ......" Approach -: APPROACR END OTHER 1 ,-,-*----- ki ,I,...- Apuroach Slope . .?.:. Runway ...iir - 500 Claar Zack ---L---7-ullwa -- .............-.:-.................--..--- .., I . . -, ..., ,..... . • ,. ..., ...... . . .-,.. ........... . ''.. IRITWAY En TOICNSIDES (FEET) r 0 I. ; L ; w i V [ S----1---1.-- RA/ cz 1 FIARE L!".‘•.F... 4/72 110. APPROACH _ =3 • 1 ,J 2 1 1 1 2 1 3 f sIpFs 1 AREA !RATIO A --- ' 1 000' 000 . 250 I h 0 I 1,250 1 20:1 . 8.035 1 .1:I V F--- •"::: P.E. , v 1,000, 5o00 a 20 ;450 1 1,2 0 20:1 1 8.035 .1:1.•V / - 1,0001 5.000 ! 500 650 I 1.250 0 - 20:1 13.200 .075;1 : N.V. 1,0001 5,000 I 500 1 800 1 2,000 1 20:1 1 14.922' ! 45:1 - 1,000 c 5,000 • 500 800 2,000 20:1 1 3.4.lope .15:1 3 1----Ti.i: 1,000'0 5 oaf.; 500 800 0 2 000 0 20:1 1 24.922 .15:1 :.:•.!,..- _ v 1 1,0001 5,000 1 500 1L 1 ] 500 1 20:1 e 13.77 .1:1 1 IT, 1,000! 5,000 1 500 . 700 1,500 . 20:1 13.77 1 .1:1 s V ___L____-_: L,000 000 . 00 i 00 1,500 . 20,1 I 13.77 I .1:1 --.3- 111.1). 3/4+ 1,700 l 10.000 1 500 1 1,010 1 - 00 1 . :1 2..46 . .1 :1 le v -r 0 1 ono■ 5.000 I 3 000 1 200 0 1 00 20:1 I° :ma.. 3,14 1.700 10,000 1 1 DOD 1 O. L 000 I 32111 j148.978 I. ./5:1 v Sr: e ..., V , , 1,000.. 5,000 i 1,000 1 1,100 ! 1,500 1 20:1 1 214.105 7 i, P 2,500 I 50,000 ' 1,000 1 1 1,0 r 16 000 0:14.0:1 I. 8.•1!, _:. .15:1 . D.P. 36+ 1 1,7001 10 000 : 00 1 1 010 00 I :1 2-. 6 1 .1 :1 , !NA,. 3/1.1+ ' 3,700 i 19,000 ! 500_a 1 010 CO - ' 14:1 : 2 .1465%r .15:1 9 N.P. 3Aw 1 1,700 10,000 1. 1,000 1 1.1325 ' 00 '' ' :1 ' : . 20 1.125:1, .N.P. 3/11 1,700: 10,000 1 lt000_11L1,510 ! 4,000 I . 34:1.• , 48,978 1 .15:1 , - to -.- 11 N.P. 3/1. i 1,700, 1 1 000 ' 1 2 4 :1 ' 4 . 20 '.12 :1 P 2,500: 50,000 1 1,000 I 1,750 1 16,000 1 50:1/140:1 1 78.914 1 .15:1 i N.P. 3/h I 1 7001 10 ow 1 1 op() I a io 1 000 1. 4:1 1 1,8.978 1 .15:1 'N.Y. 3 1,7000 10,000 1,000 ' 1,510 __14.000. ' .. 41 ' ' 148.978 .15:1 11,1 ...... . V.P. 3/14 i 1,7000 10,000 _ 1,000 1 1,510 1 4,000 ' , 34:1 L8.978 I .15.11-P _ 2,5001 50,000 , 1,000 1_ 1050 1 16)000 1 50:140:1, 1 78.91k 1 .151 1 l'il, I 13 P 0 2,500, 50,000 I 1,000 I 1,750 -1 16,000 I 50:1/140:1 1 78.9/4 I .15:1 - P 2,5001 50,000 1 1,000 1 1.750 ' 16.000 1 50:1 0:1 1 78.9/1, ' .15:1. • - _ . _ . . . , . .... . . ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THE ABOVE CHART V . Visual approach N.P. 3/4 = Non-precision approach with visibility Non-precision approach adnimums an low as 3/4-mile ' i1:: N.P.13i4+ Nes-precision approach with vinibility P . Preoicion inetrunent Approach minium= greater than 3/14-rile ....4Y.-. - - .-, - ' - . _ ' 042 1/30/81 AC 150/5300-4H CHG 5 * q. Runway Clear Zone. A trapezoidal area at ground level under the control of the airport authorities for the purpose of protecting the safety of approaches and keeping the area clear of congregation of , t , people. The runway clear zone begins at the end of each primary 1 surface and is symmetrically centered upon the extended runway centerline. (See appendix 6 for runway clear zone dimensions.) - 1 - i r. Runway, Safety Area. A rectangular area, symmetrical about the run- way centerline, which includes the runway, runway shoulders, and .- stopikays, if present. The portion abutting the edge of the runway shoulders, runway ends, and stopways is cleared, drained, graded, and usually turfed. Under normal conditions, the runway safety area g . is capable of supporting snow removal, firefighting, and rescue I equipment and of accommodating the occasional passage of aircraft without causing major damage to the aircraft. • . ': re ii s. StoplEnd of Runway. The far end of the runway as viewed from the -1. cockpit of a landing aircraft. * '.:. t. Stopway. An area beyond the takeoff runway, no less wide than the 1. runway and centered upon the extended centerline of the runway, able to support the airplane during an aborted takeoff without causing . 1 structural damage to the airplane, and designated by the airport - authorities for use in decelerating the airplane during an aborted takeio.ff. Olt J: * u. Taxilane. A defined path, to and from aircraft parking positions, 'v rix seleated or prepared for the taxiing of aircraft. M 1 h v. Taxiway. A defined path, from one part of an airport to another, I! selected or prepared for the taxiing of aircraft. I . mt ii w. Taxiigay Safety Area. An area, symmetrical about the taxiway , . - centerline, which includes the taxiway and taxiway shoulders. The li a , portion abutting the edge of the taxiway shoulders is cleared, draiiied, graded, and usually turfed. Under normal conditions, the ved t1! i -, axiway safety area is capable of supporting snow removal, fire- fighting, and rescue equipment and of accommodating the occasional passage of aircraft without causing major damage to the aircraft. 1 . 1 E . x. Threshold. The beginning of that portion of the runway available and suitable for landing of airplanes. * , e 0 y. Transport Category Airplane. Any airplane certificated under the * ,- provisions of FAR Part 25, formerly Part 4b of the Civil Air Regulations. , I: :i. • P1 P. Chap 1 . • : :: ] • i . i [ 043 11 1/30/81 AC 150/5300-4B CHG 5 - - .R- : * i. Hazard to Air Navigation. An obstruction to air navigation that either has not been the subject of an FAA aeronautical study or has been determined to be a hazard to air navigation as a result of an FAA aeronautical study. (See paragraph 16 for further discussion.) j. Nonnkecision Instrument Runway. A runway having an existing instrument approach procedure utilizing air navigation facilities withionly horizontal guidance, or area-type navigation equipment, for which a straight-in nonprecision instrument approach procedure has been approved, or planned, and for which no precision approach facilities are planned, or indicated on an FAA approved airport lay- out Plan; a Department of Defense (DOD) approved airport layoht plan; o ! ther FAA planning documents; or DOD airport planning documents. -. . , k. Obstcle. Any fixed or mobile object that is located on an area intended for the surface movement of aircraft, that extends above a defined surface intended to protect aircraft in flight, that inter- , fereS with the siting or operation of navigation aids, or that may ■ control the establishment of instrument procedures. „ . • . _ , . 1. Obstacle Free Zone (OVZ). An area; . . (1) Comprised of: • . ”. :. ., (a) Runway OFZ. The runway OFZ is the volume of space above a • i surface longitudinally centered on the runway. The eleVa- tion of any point on the surface is the same as the eleva- tion of the nearest point on the runway centerline. The runway OFZ extends 200 feet (60 m) beyond each end of the runway and its width is: 1 For nonprecision instrument and visual utility runways . . ."- expected to accommodate only aircraft of 12,500 pounds (5 700 kg) or less, maximum certificated takeoff .. weight, 250 feet (75 m). 2 . .. I . For precision instrument runways expected to accom- modate only aircraft of 12,500 pounds (5 700 kg) or ' less, maximum certificated takeoff weight, 300 feet (90 m) . (See figure 5-1.) ...5■ -.. 44 3 For runways expected to accommodate aircraft of more ''- 1 than 12,500 pounds (5 700 kg), maximum certificated takeoff weight, 400 feet (120 m). (See figure 5-1.) . - * !,11 11 -.--, A2 Chap 1 Par 3 1.!.7 0414 AC 150/5300-4B CHG15 1/30/81 :• (1) Category A: Speed less than 91 knots. (2) Category B: Speed 91 knots or more but less than 121 knots. (3) Category C: Speed 121 knots or more but less than 141 knots. Category D: Speed 141 knots or more but less than 166 knots. (5) Cat lory E: Speed 166 knots or more. b. Aircraft Parking Line Limit. A line established by the airport authorities beyond which no part of a parked aircraft should protrude. 1 * • c. Airport Hazard. Any structure or object of natural growth located on or in the vicinity of a public airport, or any use of land near such airpot, that obstructs the- airspace required for the flight of aircraft i0 landing. Or taking off at the airport or is otherwise hazardous to aircraft landing or taking off at the airport. (See paragraph 16 for further discUssion.) • d. Airport La+out Plan. A scale drawing of the airport showing 4 existing and proposed airport facilities and obstructions to air navigation 1 * e. Airport Reference Point (.11.RP). A point having equal relationship to all existing and proposed landing and takeoff areas. (See appendix 7.) f. Approach Enid of Runway.. The near end of the runway as viewed from the cockpit of a landing aircraft. g. Clearway. An area beyond the runway not less than 500 feet (150 m) wide, centrally located about the extended centerline of the runway, and under theOontrol of the airport authorities. The clearway is expressed in terms of a clearway plane, extending from the end of the runway with an upward slope not exceeding 1.25 percent, above which no object nor any terrain protrudes. Threshold lights, however, may protrude above the plane if their height above the end of the runway is 26 inches (66 cm) or less and if they are located to each side of the runway. A clearway increases the allowable operating takeoff weights of turbine engine powered airplanes. For most airplanes, the maximum usable length of clearway is less than 1,000 feet (300 m) . h. Displaced Threshold. A threshold not located at the approach end of ' a runway. 1 , . OP,A2',GE COUNTY' . u Baar2D OF CaNISSIONERS lin. r.d.a. Item. No..b!",1 ACTION l'GRTDA DIN ABSTRACT MEETING DATE May 23, 1983 _.._ ' Subject: Proposed Private Road Standards • , __ _ r Departmant: Planning "-----7-----1 ff2blicliez;:ang: ,x yes - . . .. . . Informatizn CX)ntact: Attarlment(S) : Exiting Private Road Marvin Collins Standards; Proposed Private Road '' Standards Phcn© Nariber:' 732-8181 EXT. 346 PURPOSE: To receive citizen input on the proposed changes to the private road standard . , ' • /MID: The existing Private Road Standards have been in effect for several.years. Based on a review of the existing private roads and experience in administeri the present standards, it appears some of the requirements are excessive for the small amounts of traffic on, the roads and that the objective of providing adequate access for residents and emergency vehicles can be accomplished with the proposed standards. The new standards also contains more detailed information and description on the construction requirements than the old standards. These details are needed to administer the standards fairly and consistently. PRESENT PROPOSED 1-3 Class C 1-3 Class C 4-8 Class B 4-9 Class B 9 or More Class A 10 or More Class A The construction standards are also proposed to be changed. , " PRESENT . PROPOSED- Class C - 10' Travelway Class C - 8' Travelway . , Class B :- 18' Travelway Class B - 12' Travelway Class A - 20' Travelway Class A - 18' Travelway . . . IMPACT: The new siandards will increase the number of lots that can be served by a Private Road and reduce the width of the road. Class C roads that are less than 500' long will not be required to be built to Orange County Standards. The standards will also more accurately describe how the road is to be constructed in order to receive approval. 1 , . '; t am �` ' 'J ; .. . ; k .� Ii '` ' . ' ^t" :c y `.y1 t^,■:Yl�, .�ttr ,,,s r --. , „, , ; : « Ka.4r s': ;:r1-'.,'' 1 ' ? '$1” t:l,4a?M..4awa,l:a.'NN..... H ....... s. _ _ —— ••'ii/Ywww.iMr. - .c..iriiiw,.w.....,. 1�.:�,' .I ♦" li-iniT:um. Cons tt�:Ci.on Standards 1 - ! for Pr:cc/ tt;( Toat1:'i in Orange County CI.. A. • fd1.�t_ . :Right of Way 2p' '!;°�o�re:l. l'ay W:icl t h ' S's.ciulder ;1i.cttlt Cut 6 Shoulder UtdtlIt Fill 6' ))itch Front Slope 4:1 Cu!. & Pill Slopes (0-6' fle:ight) 2:1 Cut & Fill Slopes (Over 6' Height) 11:1 . CI,17.ss it. Ek. laght of Way 3 `6S' , Travel way width B. Shoulders and ditches are subject to desj.gn approval by the Orange County Planning Board and County Commissioners. C::!ns1 C. 2i;ntt A. lIti.-g1:tt of Way -I 60' Travel Way width lot . (provisions for two way tral l is ., nas: be included and approved by the Orange County Planning Board and County Commissioners) B. i.;-i.,',ht of v:ay may be reduced to 30' provided that the Planning Board and Count, CClmCSv fCw ^r S find that further subd ivision is impossible dee! to inadequate 1' size as r e l by the Orange County Zoning Ordinance. 1 .. C. Shoulders and C : Eche. are subj .-et to design approval by Orange County N en!' :3,t1g Board and County Co1'i+'.Q:i.s:%ioner s. Class A _B and C. i N :r.itl;um Grade 7! intersection grades for 1001 a/ c:ach way {r y:11.m m Drainage plans to be approved by the Orange County Erosion Control Officer Culverts J.en,atha type, and .. . . . , ,:,,:.V.,..J...-:.,. - .-‘..`:,,i... :, :,",,-. •:• ': : - : 1,-',.1;:.,,, 11. ' . . '.4$'11., ' ' ;... ''' '' ,: .. 'J, .■ t . '.1(4.'' 4.; -', ' 7t.'.1, 1= . t-'1:';: , + , ' 1 _ - " , • 1 . • t ' . U4:i 1 . _ L. --"--'""''''''''-'' -- --• - - 1 --........--............. ............ • • • :.• ;:,- Erosion CoetIol Coslouliez_.s OE 1.C..%1,e,,.. l_odt.,..„ • :,\) .M.c..-7 ,.. ,,c. ALt subdi.vriiou roads sball ha seeded and 1:-A1ubcd accordi_nz-r, to of Tr,ransion spacifications vo maintaiu the stalliliv:ation c soule;ers :tad slopes/- . Ali piue 411verts, storiA sewers and appurtenances shall be free of eIL debris iuld .r.;i1t+. build-up aud shall ba structural !y and hydraulically souud and 1' U:- iti. a letoLal nattnex- All drain:317,a d:i.t.Che:.; shall. be of such 1.75„dth arte, e2.-11,--h and with sluch a slo pe as to carry the anticipated discharges_ Any se..coaLty road should have drainage established that is adequate to 'I.:Ante-3n the road in a Pannar that is justifiable based upon the service that inlc: xond Conc,.ntrat:ed run of must be discharged at non-erosive velocities onto undisturbr.d stEltble areas. The grade of the side ditches should be such that the water is carri-d rapidly to a good stiAble outlet. Aminimu= longitudinal grade of 0.57; is . desirable to provide proper drainage longitudinally. A minimum transverse , • shoulder: grade of 1/2, inch .per foot is expected to carry water of the shoulder arca wha the shoullers arc not surfaced. Side ditches need not he very deep; a depth of 2 or.3 feet below the crown of the roadways is sufficient and the side.'..; .F.:110:Ad be givca a slope flat enough to prevent caving. *atehes should have as great a grade as possible, they should be well cleaned out and have frec, outlet. The slope of the crown should be sufficient to carry the -water freely and quickly to tha isjde ditch. , Tbe proper crown to use for earth, clay or gravel Toads is 1 indb ler foot. 1 . 1 ,. . ( rlit Sl.O p a 0:ad x ill of :o ad - . ... - , , . - The angle, for gradad slopes and fills Shall be no greater then the FlOir! V1110.1> (:-9P ba 'iretainf.,-1 by vez.ntation cover. The slope from the outside edge of the Shoulder to the bottoof: 'Cite ditch sbauId. be 4 Illorizontal to 3 vertical. . Slopes left e,x.posed wilt within 30 working days o completion of arty 1 phase of grading be seeded .-.r otherwise provided With ground cover devices or structures sufficidet to restrain erosion. . 1 • , - .. . (C) St...abilization of. Shoulders e.--3 Slor--,. -._•__ - Prevent erosion an shoulders using seeding, sodding or -mulching. On cut and f511 slopes, prevent rtlat off over ifitC1 face of the slopes by t1 tepr ,y divers:70 . LI s, shoulder dikes or other m',..esures. (D) D-s7.54n and Pe'rformence of Control ileasures. ....... .....-..._ ...... Erosion and Sedimentation Control measures shall be so plann=.d, desic,ar, and constructed as to provide control of accelerated erosion and sedim-'.utatio, ' , . .... . , . . • - `, • , 1 :__, ,.. : . ,,, ",_ , 1 _- ,' ''i''...,•-•,"'I - ••- '`,^ • ',' ' :',. ; '' :' : ,; ,.. . , :: 8 0 4 . , 1 ........................................, .„.. .........____:..... i....._.....,..............„._........._____ . . ......., ... . . . . - .- .. c: Ele ., .-. .. Allmmle. _,J tUI'll, nay be ree:uced by the Orana Counv Planning I;9:y.rd and Co,uity Clatiu.:;:ionat.-: in bigh slopaaz,:e areas Tt.z-v.:4 W.d.v Desis,:u Class A ....... _____ The trav-,litimy shall have a base with a minimum of 4" og all xmather -itarial such Els gravel or stone. The vnterial used is subject to approval by -1,,-- 0e CouriLy Planning Board and County Co7oissioners.r If tilore t. 'erlal is needed, £t will be required. The road %.iill be stabilized as approved by the Orange County Planainp-, 1:ciaret and Cour4, Comissioners. I . Clas J; & C Road will Ibe stabilized and include an all—weather surface as approvt2c3. by the Orane,e County Planning Board and County Cocaissioners. . 1 . qi.7'It Distaneel .t...:.,..•.. _:. ______ . . I. ninimum sight distance when connecting new subdivision road to e-iar.,:tirq,,; State Nainained Secondary Roads is 125 Jeer. 2. 1ani-mu:1 sight distance uhen connectiug uew subetivision roads to exis'ifing State Naintlained Primary Roads (U.S.. or N.C. ) is 150' . . 3: iiinimum sight distance for Dell internal subdAvision Intersections, el.11s de sne and inirm: st:rec- ts is 100 fr...: L. ,. . 1. The most desirable intersections are these with angles of 75 to 90 itegrecE; 2. Intersectidns Trith angles from GO degrcq:s to 75 degrees- are undesirable, I bat are acceptable under e:::tree conditions. 3. lutersecticins an3les less than 60 deuces axe unacceptable. 4. All intcrs^ctions are subject to approval b the State Ili-way Department. . - .. AT)plir..etion . Class "A" standard shall generally apply to private roads in a suWiliisic of 1;reater than 8 lots. Class "n" standards shall generally apply to privatr, roncl.!.:. in a subdivision with 4 to 8 lots. C] "C" standards shall apply C6 subilivjsions of less than 4 lots, Each subdivisjon -shall be considered on an individual basis ovecall. Such data as .locatioct, size of lots, topography, . i p:,:st and future development, and protection of environent shall ha used to determine vhici standard will be applied. r - . : :; : ,. . • . . : . . , . .. .'4...: i.'' .•. . . , t , , .. , •' : I . , t .. • . , . , - .. • . , 1 . . . . . [ • ' r• , - 7 I 049 r . 1 ... . I .. i . I . _.., .,-'--- 1 , I . (.;r)I }) (-)t.ir i t I . I 1 , i 1 1 . i • " * I • 1 r i N.N 20' M .. 1 .... t , . 50' / ,, , • -« TI-1 1)F l'Z / \ C•1 .. . /.....C......,—......,—---,:;.....•.7. ..7, - \ )••••• .. cr, • / . t.ri• ..••• Nt ..• V... __--....tr:',.____ ///>2.'..c''.. ' .. to• I 2 I) .-•-•,..----...L-........--:-:.—___%.----. ____ ----;.--..,_-1,..;,..„1 ...... 0.- S!Girl pi STA Nt I;E „„1 _ .. . _................ ...........„_. ....,_______. ...........___ .._.,.......___.— --.._.....--. _ ....„. ______••___. EXIST . •• .... t. . • . . *.*---"'"*--..--7"7.-—1,777:.---::::7.:.:'-..:.::.: ::::'.7:-.7 77 ..:7:.-...4-7,''.7.-.-.':—.....,....-1-:.-... :7.:-•.17-r,•:•.:,7.,..-•.-^,rrtm-•-::1---.77. 1-",;7177. r?E--_,.r.,()Nii i'vi;v.-L.':i\i;fl fl)tz i) 1\1 I::VI S' r:1: I -I' C C)NI l'i r:-.c.T i 0 N c'. ............. . .. . " . " • . 1 . . . f . 6() .... .. .. , rz.tr.;-1 I—0 : . — t r‘s rzt . r... . , S I IC)UL.1):-:i t 1 r1 . , .. , ... e . *.... . .." • , • '' ., i - „r 1.:',!•51: P:1Z Er. ,,,..—..„ ::::"..;■".= ---...-Zt....*::! .::::::-L.,.....-.....,..:.::..7..r........':-........_.1-.•........._.,,„..,„,..,,,,,,,,...:::„,t,;.„....ta„::_lt,:„... ....„- -1-- . i _ . _ ,.......„,,......, . .. . 1 .. ' .■ .-... . '''•"--.7":.,"':. .,,'7,7- .-4,: ■ . . •--: .,..:.. .,,.....1-4 u*.*;:t1., . - '-.' ' '-- •.:;..."-:',--.:.‘,-2-.:, !.;25,4,. '77.7-: 7""' .Z.,:".".. .-":7: 7,-•:'"•:t." v---.-,:-",-,.....--.-,...... . , . .4.- . PIZY i0. 1983 I 1:;14: 0-P40 ORANGE COUNTY PRLVAIE ROAD STANDARDS , • Orange County allows the construction of Private Roads to serve lots within ..,,.., subdivisions that ao not have access to state-maintained roads. The purpose of a Private Road is to insure that all lots have documented legal right-of-way and to provide adequate access for residents and emergency vehicles. Private Roads may be permitted in situations where one or more of the following conditions exist: . . 1. traffic volume would be small 2. the subdivision consists of less than 10 (ten) lots 3. the division would preserve a natural area through deed restrictions and special design features 4. the division is adjacent to property using an existing Private Road . , ..... ' for access , : ... . 5. the property does not abut any important street 6. the road would no be accepted by the State even if built to their standards because of the low housing density or length . .;•':..! After initial construction of the Private Road maintenance must be provided by the property owners that use the road. A Road Maintenance Agreement or 2 - Declaration between the lot owners is required to insure that the needed repairs are made. Since Private Roads are not constructed to North Carolina Department of Transportation standards, they will not be added to the Secondary Road System and will not be maintained by the State or Orange County. The standards and specifications for Private Roads apply to subdivisions in Orange County and the class of road required depends on the number of /cite nerved by the road. A Class C road serves 1 to 3 lots, a Class B road serves 4 to 9 lotn and a Class A road serve's 10 or more lots. (Class A road requif.es approval of the Board of County Commissioners.) Generally, subdivisions with ten. (IO) or more lots are required to construct a road to the standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. (Exceptions to this may be allowed under the condi- tions listed above.) Before the final plat of the subdivision can he recorded, '- the Private Road must be built and approved or the applicant must post a aecurity instrument with the county in an amount that would cover the cost of constructing the road. Class C Private Roads that are 500' or less in length are not required t ' to be constructed to Orange County Standards or to be inspected before recordation . of the final plat. However, Orange County recommends that these Class C toads be built to these standards xn order to provide adequate access, especially for :rr'' emergency vehicles which require the clearances and turn areas shown on the apeCi- illations, • Construction of the Private Road must be inspected and approved by the Orange County Planning Department. The road should.be inspected during construction in order that any changes necessary to insure approval can be made before the final : -,:.:• inspection. In order for these inspections to be made during construction, the :- property owner must inform the Planning Department prior to the start of grading so that the inspections can be scheduled. The inspections by the Planning Department ...,: are made only to insure the road is built to the required dimensions, that: an acceptable stone surface is provided, any disturbed areas are seeded in permanent vegetation and the road sign is in place. The county does not assume responsibility • for such quality control inspections as compaction of fill or construction materials. The person having the road built should have a qualified grading contractor to insure that adequate methods and materials are used. - - : :. ... • 1 • . .. ' . . . . ' , . . •, . .. . . . , .. . E., :::, ,' , .• : . - . . . , .,.. . . ' . '-'!,' .:;,;,, , . -.- ,.,... Li,• , . - , . , - - ' '••• • • 7.74 051 , . Note: Construction of a Private Road must confrom with the requirements of the Orange County Sedimentation and Erosion Control Ordinance. This ordinance requires that precautions be taken to pervent damage by soil erosion or sedimentation regard- less of the amount of land disturbance. When the amount of land disturbance exceeds 20,000 square feet, the property owner or his agent is required to obtain the necessary permits and to pay the appropiate fees. Generally, permits and fees are • required when the length of the Private Road exceeds 1,000 feet for a Class C road, 770 feet for a Class B road or 570 for a Class A road. The permit must be obtained before construction begins. Contact the Erosion Control Officer for assistance. -GENERAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL SEQUENCE Submit request for subdivision and Private Road to Orange County Planning Department. Check proposed road name with Planning Department list to avoid duplication. Apply fbr grading permit if land disturbance invlbves more than 20,000 square feet. ft'- :r Receive subdivision approval. Construct road to Orange County standards or post security bond for I. construction of the road. 11, Record final subdivision plat with Register of Deeds. , 7 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE Contact Planning Department before beginning construction so inspections can be scheduled. Remove all trees, stumps, roots and other vegetation from the width of right-of-way necessary to construct the road to the required dimensions. Fill and compact all depressions created by clearing. 1 Build roadbed to required dimensions, cutting, filling and compacting where necessary for a desirable grade. Install culverts to provide cross drainage. Construct side ditches and crown travelway. Place and compact 4" of surface material. ""'•• Seed and mulch disturbed areas. ' Install road name sign. Final inspection by Planning Department. 2 . . lit..;?;,;,,,iti7!7■75,":•1::Ip::7,,.*:,r-d174:15■Si .:.: ■va....0.,.. . .. "- ' ' • ' . 052 . . , _ __. ............... _:. ......... . _ .... . !.■r': I '.1..i. STANDARDS FOR PRIVATE WADS , . - . • Travelway . The traveiway must be surfaced and compacted with a material acceptable to Orange County to the required width of the particular class of road. A crown should be built into the traveiway so that water will drain from the road surface into the side ditch. 'The crown should not be so great as to cause vehicles to slide off the travel-way when ice or show are on the road. • 1 ;"'- ;: i I•,,-,: Generally the road should be crowned as shown in the specifications sheet so that runoff will drain to the ditches on both sides of the road. However,..in. some situations it may be desirable not to crown the road but to have the travelway sloped to a single ditCh as shown below. This is applicable in two situations: where it is necessary to cut down on the length of a ditch in order tf. 1 , to reduce the erosion potential by decreasing the volume of runoff r or where it it difficult to construct ditches due to rock or in, curves. i . , . ....**.....'s.ss `'..........,............ , .:....., PITCH OF TRA VELWAY i 1,,......: ; 1 .1::... Surface Materials Acceptable material for surfacing the traveiway is Aggregate Base Course (commonly called "crusher run"). Soil type base materials (commonly called "Chapel Bill Gravel" or"Chapel Bill Grit") will be accepted under the following , conditions i L-- .;;I. The material originates from a quarry approved by the North CArolina . , . , . Department of Transportation. The grade of the road is less than 8%. Where the grade is greater than 8% a layer of crusher run stone will ! be placed over the Chapel Hill Gravel before compaction. Sources of surface material shall be verified with the Orange County 1*-- '. Planning Department before use. . . . — Fill Material Where filling is necessary to raise the roadbed, cross watercourses or fill stumpholes, it shall be done with suitable material that is free of roots , .. or other organic matter. The fill should be firmly compacted to reduce settle-. ment that will cause ruts or holes in the finished road. . i . , 1 1 . i f 't• _ . . , . I ....„ . , " . ;t• , - - 7 1,4 .,•'. — ,7" • ,hits 42.6 c - • Two-Way Traffic Private Roads shall provide for two-way traffic in order to prevent conflict of vehicles meeting head-on. Too-way traffic can be accomplished by widening the travelway at prescrZed locations to allow vehicles to pass or to pull over and stop while another vehicle passes. Grade The grade of the road should be between 3 and 12 per cent and shall not '- exceed 18% because of the difficulty of operating vehicles on such a steep road and the high potential for erosion of the travelway and ditches. Where possible, the road should be ccnstructed along the contour of the land to avoid steep grades., Intersection with Public Road • The intersection of the Private Road with the existing public road shall permit a safe entrance and exit. Adequate sight distances alon3the public road shall be provided by choosing a good location for the right-of-way and clearing sight triangles when building the road. I , The intersection of a Private Road with a public road must provide an adequate place for cars to stop before entering the public road. See the diagram below. : • E7-°19 PUBLIC ROAD UNACCEPTABLE tk1 P•C) VO"' INTERSECTION • 0 PUBLIC ROAD • il•C°) ‘115:C ACCEPTABLE : INTERSECTION I The Private Road must flair at the public road in order to permit a vehicle to to enter the Private Road when another vehicle is waiting on the Private Road. The dimensions of the required flair are shown on the specifications sheet for each class of road. 4 *. ; • * . : Ail --:%:.:',,:,- -:- 054 ',1`. ' -m . . , . ,. .., k . Drainage 1 , Ditches shall be constructed to provide drainage from the road and adjacent areas. The ditches shall be built with sufficient depth to carry the expected • volume of water. The side slopes shall be graded so that they can be stabilized - and to prevent vehicles from becoming stuck if they slide into the ditch. Where the road crosses streams or minor watercourses, culverts shall be installed to prevent ponding and washouts of the road. Oa streams where it is not economical to install a large culvert of the required size, the Erosion Control Officer may allow the installation of a smAller culvert if provisions 1 : are made to protect the road surface and fill slopes from erosion when runoff tops the road. Turn-Arounds / 1 Vehicle turn-around areas shall be provided at the end of all dead end .. roads. This can be accomplished by ending the road in a cul-de-sac or a Cul-de-sacs shall have a minimum diameter of 70'. A. "T" turn-around must conform to the dimensions in the diagram below. The "T" type turn-around is prefered, , The location of the turn-around will depend on the arrangement of the Iota in the subdivision. If the Private Road serves only one lot the turn-around should be located near the building site. In a subdivision with several lots the turn- around should be at the end of the road and the necessary right-of-way provided, 11, - . _-__ /A '1 - 50' 11•T.• . . 12' Travelway 40' __J r 1- : ----- - Ri.9111:-.of-Way v .7. • .., ,. • i ___ -1.- ' , • 20' , -, 1....• .‘- :: 1 --,.. •t, Road Name and Sign // The road name shall be verified with the Orange County Planning Department i . to insure that the proposed name does not duplicate an existing name. The road sign must have one blade showing the name of the Private Road and another showing the name of the existing state maintained road. 1 , s .,., - 11 ,... . It' .. . = - ' 1 - , -- ... • .-. . =.2, . ... ., . ,7 : „..::_:,. , . ,,y :.,,r.. ... .. ,: . , ,,a.,; :. 72;"`..r..".."''':‘7."''''..." ''':4'' .., .. : 1 .. . 8'-`' --•,,,,- -. :_,-.-..:... ..:...-, -, . • , .. -..... ,, . .. - .- -,,,,,..,._;::::::$,"--,. ,,......„-... - -.,..:_-,:-......-. , . . ., .._. I.',.• . . . . . , Right-of-Way ;..; The right-of-way shall be 50' wide and indicated on the final plat. Requests . .,.. for rights-of-way less than 50' wide,but at least 25' wide,must be approved by the Board of Commissioners. Bends in the right-of-way must be at angles that will :.'.-.. permit construction of curves with a 125' minimum centerline radius. See "Minimum Curve Radius." ..,:c ...,- Permanent Ve etaation ,.., Al]. areas disturbed by the construction of the roadr including the shoulders, . ditch banks, cut and fill slopes and any borrow areasr shall be seeded in permanent ...,. vegetation to stabilize the soil and prevent erosion. Seeding should be done immediately after grading is completed and before the final inspection by the , .. Planning repartment. . l'. The disturbed areas shall, be smoothed and lightly harrowed to break up the i soil and prepare a good seedbed. The following materials are recommended per 1000 square feet. Other types of permanent vegetation may be substituted as long as they provide adequate cover to prevent erosion .. 1.4 lbs. Fescue grass seed 0,4 lbs. German or Browntop millet (to provide temporary cover until the grass becomes established) . ',. 90 lbs. lime ; ,.-..z. 23 lbs. 10-10-10 Fertilizer 2 40 lb. Bales of straw for mulch (use enough to cover 75% of the ground) 1 .-.. '.., Maintenance. Maintenance of the Private Road must be provided by the lot owners that are 1- % served by the road. The Road Maintenance Agreement between the lot owners is required to insure that the cost is shared equally and a mechanism for maintenance is set up. This responsibility for maintenance is the property owners and neither .,., the State nor Orange County will maintain the road. Regular attention shall be given to the following items in order to assure - , that the road will remain in good condition: 1 1, Vegetation: The vegetation should be mowedr limed and fertilized as needed. Areas that erode or where seeding is :....- unsuccessful should be reseeded. .., ! 2. Drainage: Culverts shall be kept clear of trash and other obstruc- tions that could prevent or reduce the culverts function. ".:... ; '..' If culverts are not kept clear it will cause runoff to ..,'; flow over the road and may cause flooding upstream. pitch banks and bottoms shall be protected from erosion by maintaining good vegetation. 3 3. Travelway,: The travelway shall be maintained by grading the surface O. material to fill any potholes that develop and to evenly le. spread the surface material where the soil has be uncovered l 'r'.... : » . because of erosion. 1 ;.., . r 4. Road Name Sign The sign shall be kept visible and legible so that J. visitors and emergency personnel can easily locate the road. , . 6 . : ., . ' , . ..: . . : .. .!...... . . . . . , . . . . . . ... . . I'.Z •' .....--— — .-...---- ,..-•-• . L. r,,;''''',' ,.......,1.... Verticle Clearance • , A minimum of 14' of verticle clearance must be providedabove the travelway ....'. to permit the passage of large vehicles under powerlines and tree limbs. N. C. Department of Transportation Driveway Permit . , The property owner is responsible for obtaining the required permit for access to the state maintained road. This permit can be obtained from the DDT in Hillsborough. Permits axe normally granted on request. - . ' ,. Minimum Curve Radius Curves shall be constructed with a minimum centerline radius of 125'. The right-of-way must be designed with bends that will provide sufficient width , -, to construct the road to this minimum radius. For example, a 90° bend in a 50' right-of-way will not provide enough area to construct a road 18 wide. The right-of-way must include sufficient width for the traveiway and the necessary shoulders, ditches and slopes. ; .• ! . , 1! i The drawing below illustrates how a curve with a 125, centerline radius t carm.at.:. be contained in a Se bend of a 50' right-of-way. The other drawings 0 -z illustrate alternative bends that will contain a curve of the minimum center' P4' .. - lino radius. - ..............................7. 1-- ---- ...... ,,-..... .." „...... .. 0 R/W ' ■, , , ,-, 1 to. I I . .-1•,, - . . ''''''''....„..........„.„......„, ( I ----ad R/W-4.- 7 1 , I . .. 1,:-; ..I!. I . ... ' ' "'• t 1 ' •;.- .'' ':..,' - ' -;? •:: -'.; .. ._.. . .. . ' ' ''"''','-'.:=,-,-; ' •-• . - ,.-;.:. -1: ; ''.-,::: ■ . . , ....-. _... . ....,....„,..........,„......................-.. ' .,'..: . V . . ',. - . --------- - .. . ...- _.... -•.;; • ,i ; i ;:•:,, i / / , 1 .. ,.., . ... ; ..: .••..... 7 / 7 ... .. 'I: •• I _ . 11, 14' 150, 4. ,L.:-: I . , 1 2 5 //://// , ;. • , .. . ,. / .. . . . . .. /7 , . . •.: 7.R ---- • 1 . 5 0',‘ / .,. ----ii ... . . . 1 . . ... . . . . .. . . . ... . , ;:-.: , - .. . . -1 •i ;:,...:'- :: A:.:':: .:.L.,..,....;.,,.■ ' '`:: '„• : ' '•:::.,,-..;.z.,47:'.-.-.-.,•:::7::.:1;',..4'z.:744: ,,h';',' 058 .... .1.,J. . ,..... , 0 9' CLASS A PRIVATE ROAD . .. •,-, I ... • I 4 . . . c SHOULDER RIGHT OF WAY SHOULDER DiTcii i I 1 I i . _ . . . . . 3' 4„ 18., 4 . i. .. TRAVELWAY . , ... 1 . . .... ..„....,,... •+•■•,r....• .....••• .... . !. }.•. • .... . . ■ Sk.*:'- : .:' . .. I-47 COM PA C TED SURFACE i -- 0? s\- . ,,..,.. . . . ..,. .. 1 ;';• °,....--° ::. A. .:, , . ,.' . ”.7...;'. 1 -* i ■ .46,,, t 1 • ; '..-.;',..,-. ... ... 25 -..„..:. , 1 - 25 , .. FLARE AT INTERSECTION WITH PUBLIC ROAD • • q 11 . .4 1 , 1 ,.„ . 4 . i 11 . . . . • . .- . . : . : -- - ..":,..,e;,. .!.:.. ' ... ' ,.,. f i..-;::::.: ,;. ... ..,,_.-,.,...•;.-..::-::, e.k,,,•.:. ! . :....-% ,e'• '.,:.-t.e-- , .-.,--..-...:1.-..-e.-:, :Poe: , , .. I . . .._ , 1 CLASS B PRIVATE ROAD 1 ,.,... . , ,.. ,.-:. RIGHT OF WAY HOU LDER ' SHOULD R DI CH • T R AVE LWAY ,. 1-- . , . . ,. .: r ‘ .N Nt°1— unitosigragfmnsemoo'=,43,=...4„„.„.„crubo 7-4 , 4f OOMPACTED SU REtC E s Q : -"'"-"---"-"--------\------"------L, ,p; .,. . , . .:...-.: g . • .., .,, . , . ,.:. 25 .,. FLARE AT INTERSECTION WITH PUBLIC ROAD .,..- :. • to :. • . . . . ... ......... • I ....,- . : : h•:.•::.;,.., „ . . 1 • . : . • • - . .. . . '-......,.',V .:.1..• • .'...-;.....--,'..:y-;.'',..---- , -.. f-.14::'•::-.'--:- ... '.-- .....',4,-.,,":''':' - • ..,,,,-... -,',---.-.7,-,..:SV„ ..:,:. ,- , : ,, ,,,....... • ,. "----.-.:,':-- --.'-;,--,' --."',•:,-;•'..--;,,,%:;.,74.-..z-',.A',--,'--,' '''''..'-'"6.t17- 4'. . ' .., ....,_ .. .. . CLASS C PRIVATE ROAD 1 .z i. .. .. .. .,. . . .... _ ........ 1 .:,.,, , .,, 1 , 50: ..: -- ... RtGHT OF WAY „ : .....: .... ,. ;-: SHOULDER I SHOULDER DiTCH . . ..--- . ..,,...,., ..„. • •••.• 4' TRAVELWAY 3 t1/4$ . .....,,.... ;.• 7:::: , . •..- -4 COMPACTED Pi.* • • — .--............„... ...............,1 . .. . , . -. ....„.. ..,. ... 1“ . ,,. .....,. i...."-.'. ', .... --— . . -• -'--- \ • ..,.;:..4.. • .).i..,,,.......,,.i......,......r,....,....."'. ..:- ., ,. ; ,..,.. .. e 25 „. :,,.... , • • . /0-251 . :•_:,„.... 1:.•. ..• ,_,.. . • - . __________.\ ......._ , • FLARE AT INTERSECTION WITH PUBLIC ROAD ! ,-• -- ! .. . 11 •,„ .„, 1 . . • -• ..,. • -.k ..„. .:....,;,..Y.,_ ''.-.....:.',...:..'„:23'.::.':::...,, ._...::, ... ..::.,.. ...,...., .:„-,..„...-.,.' . 7 ." .:. .„.., '.....,:,,,,,-..... ....:......-._... -...---,..,,,:..... ....:-.:,..,:::,:. .....-?.,i4 - --'7 _, ... OE cap..-rz " Geri.. .1.-,,.. • i "- BoARD CV CaMISSIONE:R.S 4 ; Action, Agraa, rt-7......., (...o7 ...11'4114, :,L AcTioN AGEVEA. rir-I iasTawcr -".`'....101 - Sabje,,ct.: Proposed text changes to the Subdivision Regulations ., . ' : . ,,Oeliert5sIaTt: . .„... ' PUbliC Harimgr 1 yes , no .':. . , . 'Attadkraent(s)= inf°zval--;Ina C°ntact-' Marvin Collins . . . - Phone Number= 732-8181 OCT 3.46 ' -...- -,..... -.......i ..:: PURPOSE: To receive citizen input on the proposed changes to the Subdivision Regulations .- . . ...' . : t ,'. . NEED: The following sections are proposed to be deleted. , 1 -• , 2.. . :... - C - 3 - a. When access to a minor subdivision is proposed . ' via a pre-existing, platted, private road, and ., where the private road provides access to lots in additionto the lot(s) created by the proposed I ...- minor subdivision, the Planning 8eard may recom- mend a variance, pursuant toaubsections VII-7 . to -D of this ordinance, from the right-of-way and maintenance requirements of subsection IV- .:, 8-3-e of this ordinance. All variances shall be granted in accordance with Section VII of this ordinance. ,--t- IV - B - 3 - c - 5. 'Offsets - Unless ecxeption is granted as pro- vided•in Section VII herein, an offset in the alignment of a street across an intersec- 'L - 1- tion shall not be permitted. '.'". IV - B - 3 - c - 10. IteSp_riT jrnp_tri s Unless exception is granted ,.,.. as provided in Section VII herein, reserve le, strips controlling access to streets shall not be approved. .. . . IMPACT: On October 4, 1982 the Variance Section was deleted from the Subdivision ., Regulations. The deletion of the above sections which refer to the Variance Section will clarify the Ordinance. .i!,. Z1 . ,N ' f,!;::. i:. il- IL .::. '...: ' . . T-, 1 1 i '07-. . . 7:7 Vc, , . . . - , . .,.. .....„.. Location, appearance, and operational characteristics shall be :.., . disclosed. Additionally, the forms shall, when completed by the . •.: • , applicant, disclose the name (s) and address (es) of the owner (s) ;!I of the property involved, and all relevant information needed to •'.,,, , • show compliance with the general and specific standards governing the Special Use which is the subject of the application. (See , . Section 8.2) . , ''.',''• 8.7 Minor Changes To Be Approved By Zoning Officer; Modifications Require'Action/By'Approving'Board ,. ,. .. The Zoning Officer is authorized thorized to approve minor changes in the 1 . approved plans of Special Uses, as long as they are in harmony '2. . with action of the approving Board, but shall not have the power to approve changes that constitute a modification of the approval. A modification shall require approval of the Board having juris- diction - -,- 847.1. Criteria To Be Used In Determdnation, , ..,. , . . The Zoning Officer shall use the following criteria in determining 4, whether a proposed action is a minor change or a modifications ,I•. : . , , . a) Any change in a condition imposed during the approval, of :; • a special use pernu.t s a cons-1.-u e a mo.2.-Ica -,on. .. - , • :,2.. b) Any change in use or enlargement of existing use shall con- i ':'.',•... stitute a modification. c) Any increase in intensity of use shall constitute a modifica- tion. An increase in intensity of use shall be considered to be an increase in usable floor area, an increase 3n the number of dwelling or lodging units. 77;' JIJ d) Structural alterations which significantly affecth the basic ._ .,-. size, form, style, ornamentation, and or character of the 4.:'!' building as shown on the approved site plan or described in the applicants narrative shall be considered a modification. ' '•': '-• e) Substantial change in the amount and/or location of open ;.:•' 11 4 _ space, recreation facilities or landscape screening shall, constitute a modification. ...."' kv 1.i f) Any increase in the size or number of approved signs shall ......._ .. constitute a modification. I.( -. '.t g) Any change in parking areas resulting in an increase or .. f reduction of five percent or more in the number of spaces .,. . approved shall constitute a modification. ' '.'•:: h) Substantial changes in pedestrian and/or vehicular access •';. . ',f or circulation shall constitute a modification. :i. I'• i) Any change in a setback required by the provisions of this Ordinance or imposed as a condition o approve a a 1 J -, constitute a modification. ' . . : -.. e j) Any change in the location or extent of street and utility 4.; . . .. . . I i ..., . .. . : . • . . . .,,„ 4:. . . ...,,..r..,1 -! :. : r•:..1;4,4e,....c..:•..-.:.7.i.,,,,., 1.141EW' ;.I., -, . . :■ . , Zr., ' ,•--.,. . .7,..!'11,,,,e, .;----1-;"-;'1!:::17:;4'...7.,,,44":' '''''''' ' - _ ..,-.Lil'.,' •'.. z.":"....''';:77.•::: "..?. :I.',%: , .■:-;:. : '''.' r,":.'::-=..7.T.:. :',;, ' - ' U64 , _.. ,.. _ _ . -, ; • i . , . ! , improvements or rights-of-way, including water; sewer and storm drainage facilities w ic. wou • provide a . ' . different level of service shall constitute a moditica- . i • tion. 8.7.2 Review of Record Required The Zoning Officer shall, before making a determination as to whether a proposed action is a minor chnage or a modification, review the record of the proceedings on the original applica- tion for app4oval of the Special Use. The determination shall be based upon the request of the applicant, the review of the recor• o e approv- o e origina request an. - e Zoning Officers findings under -ffie criEeria of-Section 6./.1. 8.7.3 Action Required on Proposed Minor Changes or Modifications . , , • . . \ . . The Zoning Officer shall, if it is determined that the proposed ' action is a minor change, state the findings in writing to the ' . . applican . The applicant shall file with the Zoning Officer an . amended site plan, or written statement, outlining in detail the minor changes(s) proposed. The Zoning Officer shall file the amended site plan or written statement with the approved site % !,..f. . , .. If it is determined that the pr6pose4 action is a'modification, the L . Zoning Officer shall require the applicant to submit a request for modification of the approved special use permit. The applicant . shall provide an amended site plan and written narrative outlining. , .. . the specific changes requested. The Zoning Officer sha31 submit 1 l '... :. . . the request to the Board which approved the origina) application: If the Board finds the modification substantial in its impact, or .... Washes to have additional public input, it may set a public heari. g • to receive testimony concerning the modification request. Any ' public hearing called pursuant to a modification of an approved ' special use permit shall be held in conformity with the require- . nests of Section 8.4.4. The Board may approve, approve'with con- ditions or disapprove the application for a modificat on. The - i Zoning Officer shall file the Boards action in his office as an amendment request to e origina. app ica ion. . . . . . i. 'i:'': • ! - .• ;::': :. i . . ;,... . - . I:.'• i• i :::. . , -.. . . •. , .. if • . . . ,.. ,, .. .. P. . . 11 • . . F . , . . -; ,:.'''' - • - '.'-..,'• ill.,::^ - - - ._ • . ;., • 2-- cafrNez cou-Nra - BOARD OF coxarssios Action Agenda eb_12 Item No. °ill ACC ION ITEM ABSTRACT t‘3: --T ..G DATE • • •_ , Subject: proposed changes to the Zoning Ordinance • Public HAring: x yes Deparr17,_. lantaing • Information Contact.: Marvin Collins Attackatarrt(s) : Zoning Te5ct Phone. Number: 732-8181 Err. 346 • PURPOSE: To receive citizen input into proposed changes in the Zoning Ordinance. NEED: The distinction between a minor change and a modification in Article 8 Special Uses is not as clear as it might be. The proposed changes attempt to address this problem. There are some modifications which because of their nature could not require a complete new application or even a new public hearing to be held. The proposed changes allow conditions to be changed by the Board which approved the originallapplication and also allow the Board to decide if a new public hearing is necessary or desirable. Section 8.8 now requires the submittal of only 3 copies of the site plan. The proposed would specify that for Class B use 7 copies should be submitted and for Class -A uses 20 copies should be submitted. IMPACT: The proposed changes should mace the administration of Article 8 easier and should give More guidance to the Zoning Officer in deciding what is a minor change and what is a modification of a special use permit. • • O63 Location, appearance, and operational characteristics shall be disclosed. Additionally, the forms shall, when completed by the applicant, disclose the name (s) and address (es) of the owner (s of the property involved, and all relevant information needed to show compliance with the general and specific standards governing the Special Use which is the subject of the application. (See Section 8.2) 8.7 Minor Changes To Be Approved By Zoning Officer; Modifications Requite"Actidr1 BJ Apptoviug. 'Board The Zoning Officer is authorized to approve minor changes in the approved plans of Special Uses, as long as they are in harmony with action of the approving Board, but shall not have the power to approve changes that constitute a modification of the approval A modification shall require approval of the Board having juris- diction. 8:7.1 Criteria To Be Used In Determination The Zoning Officer shall use the following criteria in determinin whether a proposed action is a minor change or a modification: a) Any change in a condition imposed during- the approval of a special use permit s a constitu e a mo.3. Ica ion, b) Any change in use or enlargement of existing use shall con stitute a modification. c) Any increase in intensity of use shall constitute a modifi. tion. An increase in intensity of use shall be considered to be an increase in usable floor area, an increase in the number of dwelling or lodging units. dt) Structural alterations which significantly affects the bas size, form, style, ornamentation, and or character of the building as shown on the approved site plan or described i the applicants narrative shall be considered a modificatia e) Substantial change in the amount and/or location of open space, recreation facilities or landscape screening shall constitute a modification. f) Any increase in the size or number of approved signs shall constitute a modification. g) Any change in parking areas resulting in an increase or reduction of five percent or more in the number of spaces approved shall constitute a modification. hl Substantial nhanaPR in nptiptrinn AnA/n,- ygh4. I A•-'." . 7 ' 17f; • : : 0€4 improvements or iights-of-way, including water; sewer and storm drainage facilities w ich wo provide a different level of service shall constitute a modifica- tion. 8.7.2 Review of Record Required The Zoning Officer shall, before making a determination as to whether a proposed action is a minor chnage or a modification, review the record of the proceedings on the original applica- tion for approval of the Special use. The determination shall be based upon the request of the applicant, the review of the record of the approval of the original request and the Zoning Officers findings unser e cri eria o ec ion : , .1. 8.7.3 Action Required on Proposed Minor Changes or Modifications The Zoning Officer shall, if it is determined that the proposed action is a minor change, state the findings in writing to the applicant. The applicant shall file with the Zoning Officer an amended site plan, or written statement, outlining in detail the minor changes(s) proposed. The zoning Of icer sha 1 i e the amended site plan or written statement wi t ,e approve. site plan. If it is determined that the proposed action is a' modification, ti Zoning Officer shall require the applicant to submit a request fo] modification of the approved special use permit. The applicant shall provide an amended site plan and written narrative outlinint the specific changes requested. The Zoning Officer shall submit the request to the Board which approved the original application. If the Board finds the modification substantial in its impact, or wishes to have additional public input, it may set a public hearil to receive testimony concerning the modification request. Any public hearing called pursuant to a modification of an approved special use permit shall be held in conformity with the require- ments of Section 8.4.4. The Board may approve, approve'with cOn- ditions or disapprove the application for a modification. The Zoning Officer shall file the Boards action in his office as an amendment request to the original application. CaiNTK EcAllo OF COMMISSIONERS Action A•g=n(71„ Item No.E dt l ACTION P,GENDA ITEA I8STRACT /i.u:ETEN;G DATE May 23, 1983 Subject: PROPOSED FARM PRESERVATION PROGRAM [ b1io Hearing: yes ,x r AttackEnent(s) : InformatiOn Contact: SUSAN SMITH • Phone Number: 732-8181 EXT. 349 PURPOSE: TO consider the Planning Board recommendation on the proposed Farm Preservation Program. To consider further action on the proposed Program as recommended. NEED: The Agricultural Task Force report To Preserve Our Farms was adopted in principle by the Board in 1981. The Implementation Committee of the Task Force revised the program outlined in the Report and a public hearing on the proposed program was held on March 28, 1983. The Board considered the Program at their May 2, 1983 meeting and requested a recommendation from the Planning Board. The Planning Board considered the proposed Program at their May 16, 1983 meeting and recommended approval of the proposed Program. Further action by the Board, as recommended by the Implementation Commit;tee, is required to pursue implementation of the program. IMPACT: Approvial of the proposed program intent and provisions would substantially address factors affecting agiculture in Orange County cited by the Agricultural Task Force and would allow recommended implementation measures : to be undertaken. RECOMMENDATION: See rebommendations of the Agricultural Task Force Implementation Committee. The Implementation Committee recommends that the Board contract for profesSional drafting services to draft a local ordinance implementing the program, as well as legislative changes required by the proposed prograM,and pursue the matter at the state level. CRANGE COUNTY 0 BOARD OF COMISSIGNERS Action Agne-1 , IT Itera No.4.100 ACTIO 1-GD. N , EWN ENABSTMOT MEET=G DATE May 23, 1983 Subject: Implementation of Watershed Protection Measures rEe-Far t7trent: Planning [ Public Hearing: yes X • a) Adapted recommendations of - Water Resources Task Force;---r----- Informat2.on ContacL: MarVin Collins ' d pte watershed Zoning Amen ments; . c) Memo on Implementation of Protection Phone Number: 732-8181 EXT. 346 Measures. .d L.t S'ies 'n W.te. , h-d e) Presentation on Starmwater Management PURPOSE: The Board of County Commissioners received an April 25, 1983 resolution from the Planning Boayl requesting the Board to reconsider minimum lot sizes in designated water supply lwatersheds. The Board discussed the resolution on May 2, 1983 and directed staff to provide information on implementation of adopted recommendations of the Water 1Resources Task Force and subdivision activity in the watersheds , (See May 2, 1983 agenda packed. for Resolution) NEED: The Board of 'County Commissioners revised and adopted the recommendations containe in the Water 1Resources Task Force Report at the August 23 and September 7, 1982 meetings. The Board also, prior to this action on July 6, 1982,approved zoning amendments for stream buffers and impervious surface ratios in the Protected Water- shed II (POI) district applicable to the University Lake and Cane Creek watershk A copy of the adopted recommendations and the approved zoning amendments are attach (AttachmentslA and B) . Also attached is a memo regarding the status of implementat of the recommendations prior to the Board's final, action. (Attachment C) The Board requested information on subdivision activity in the watersheds as data on which to base the decision regarding minimum lot sizes. Based on the data, the Board-delleted the minimum lot size requirements from the adopted recommendatior #12. The staff has updated the information on subdivision activity in the water- sheds for the Board's review. (Attachment D) The Planning ',Board in their continued dicussion of the issues of watershed protecti requested information on stormwater management objectives and approaches . Ed Holland and David Blaha from Triangle J COG and Steve Gurley from Wake County reviewed the objectives, techniques and implementation of stormwater management with the Board at their May 16, 1983 meeting. A summary of their presentation to the Board is attached. (Attachment E) IMPACT: Reconsideration and adoption of-minimuil lot s-izes in proteCted watersheds Would significantI addre6.6- protection of existing and proposed water supply reservoirs through devel pment density restrictions and associated performance standards. _ ... . , . , . . , . • , , • ' ,'; - :"' , • , . • . -,, . ....... _. _ _ . • . . . __ _._. _ . 06 Attahnt A ' 11. . . . . , Board of Cenrissioners Action Cn She Water Resourtes Task Force ? part 11 August 23, 1982 . .1 . . At its meetiilg on Auggst 23, 1932, the Board Of Cammissionere took the following action on the reccrmendations in the.Report. 1. Orange Clounty should adopt a policy which rP11..t; for minimizing total 1 ! outflows:of water from one major basin to another. . adopted S/23/82 , . : 2. Orange County Should allocate the water it has rights over in Lake Orange to the Tom of Hillsborough, the OrenV-A/armance Water Systems incorporated, and the in-stream flaw new of the Eno Myer. Me - - MCC noted that this was a long tern goal.) . adopted 8/23/82 3. Orange County Should develop policies requiring water conservation in both the receiving and withdrawal basins Where interbasin trans- fers of water are required to meet emergency situations. 1 adopted e123/62 . 4. The Task Force Report has identified five prime reservoir sites in the County. Local water suppliers should identify which of these sites they would like preserved for future use. The County and • water suppliers Should work togettemto imp-lama means of protecting and preserving these sites for future use. - The Board Mfodlied this reccmmendation to include three additional reser- voir sitesj They were sites 1? and 16 on Table 11 of the Repert (p.31) and site 14 on Table 12 (p.33). adopted 8/23/82 5. Orange. County should investigate the feasibility of a regional solution to itsifuture water needs. As part of that effort, Orange County should . reserve a portion of the water allocation fron Jordan Lake as a long term option far :later supply. the Board did not officially adopt this mittc=r2rdati0ri since it had acted positively* it in making an informal request to the Office of Water Resources for Jordan Lake water. 6. Crangp County Should promote efforts to conserve water. adopted 6/23/62 7. Crenge i County should adopt a Land Use Plan which identifies protected water !supply watersheds. These protected areas Should be University Lake watershed, Upper Eno watershed which drains to Lake Ben Johnson, and the watershed of prceosed Cane Creek reservoir. i 1 The BCCC had acted previously on this recormendation when it adopted the Land Use Plan on September 6, 1962. . 8. Orange County should adopt a Land Use Plan and associated regulations whichipreserve and enhance water quality in protected watersheds. Cer- tain point scurces of polluticn including sewage treatrent plants, land fills, hazardous waste generators, storage facilities or disposal 1 I 1 I .. - , . . .. • . . ' ' ''';'- .4..:-2 e :.•,; 4,'.,:- - ii . . . - -- . , ... q . . , , . • 068 . . • . , . , i sites, and major new highways ahould be prohibited Iran these watersheds. Urban develepeent including mediumand hie -density residential, commer- cial and industrial uses should be prohibited Fran University Lake and Cane Creekeeeersheds. • I adapted 8/23/82 The BO CC asked staff to draft fangs -, e..- • •.-. • trial develop- ment *Seven Mill Creek Sebbasin. ( • ' 4.4.3 9. The Tejns of Cantor° and HilLsborough and Chathan and Alamence Counties should.* encouraged to incorporate the findings and reccuaendations of this report into their Land Use Plans and development regelations.. adopted 8/23/82 . . 10. The Cringe eJater and Sewer Authority should be enccuraged to adopt a policy which states that it will not extend sewer and water lines in- . to the University Lake and Cane Creek watersheds except in emergency situations. The Sawn of Hillsbcrough, the Town of Mebane and Orange- Alamane water systems should be encouraged to adopt policies that state that they will only extend sewer and water lines into the Upper Eno watershed in accordance with the Land Use Plan of Orange County except'in emergency situations. adopted 8/23/132 % 11. Orange County should extend coverage of its zoning ordinance to inclede the proeosed protected water supply watershed areas in Bingham, Hills- borough, Cheeks and Cedar Greve townships. 6,- adopted 8/23/82 t , . - __ ..... 12.- Orange County should implement the folloeing zoning districts and associ- ated performance standards in protected watersheds. Far nonresidential develapeents the ratio of Impervious surface to gross land area Should not eiceed 0.25. adopted 8/23/82 - - -- 13; Orange County should require stream,buffers along perennial streams in water supply watersheds and stipulate land uses for these buffers areas appropriate to their intended functions. The Task Force rec=ends that the width of stream buffer along any length of strean be 50 feet plus , 4 times the percent slope. The stream buffer should be ceasured Iron the edge of the flood plain. The technical review committee established in the County zoning ordinance should review the buffer requirements for all proposed non-residential developments and require additional buffer area where necessary. The Task Force recomrends that stream buffer areas remain in natural vegetation. The BCCC on June 6, 1962 adopted watershed zoning e=ndaents which included requirements for buffer areas along streams. lg. Orange County should adopt the following reccmmendatione regarding an- , site!waste water disposal systems: All newly platted lots bordering on perennial streams arid. requiring an an-site waste water disposal systems should show a second disposal area to be recorded as an easement on the final plat ani no building or other activity should occur cn this por- tion'of the parcel of lend which would prevent its future use for on- site waste disposal. Orange County should investigate developing an on-site waste water disposal system monitoring and maintenence progre for the three water supply watersheds in the County. adopted 8/23/82 i I+j1 06 t 15. Crary County should adopt stoniwater ;management fleas ' s that would i apply to protected watersheds. . adopted 8/23/82 C I • 16. CJr'2r1ge County shi 1d Vqpt the two following recommendations relprein6 1 _r sediintation and erosion: the County should continue to administer a strong local sedimentation and erosion control program. The County should sponser in conjunction nction with C1.ASA a reso rce conservation and development project in Cane Creek and University Lake watersheds.. _ ... _ _ 1 I adopted 8/23/82 AI 17. Orange County sh rid develop a plan of action for dealing with spills of hazardous materials in water supply watersheds. . . adopted 8/23/82 • At its meeting on Tkcer 1, 1981, the Planning Boat passed the following motion: ' The Planning Bold approves in principle the Report of the Orange County Water Task Force, but wishes to call attention to the :'pct that the Report does not addressithe utiliTarion and protection of water in the Jordan Lake Reservoir which should be given consideration in the future as representing a potentially large and important source of water and that measures s1.ould be taken to eliminate pollution flu.treatment plants and otter various sources of pollution in the future. The BOCC at its reeting on Augist 23, 1982 requested staff to draft an addi- tional water management policy reflecting the Planning Board's motion. 'he policy should include a statement about cooperation with Triangle J COG in Ll a regicnal watershediprotection plan and encourase towns in the County o clean up any local sources of water pollution. Ar_r . . „..._ . . , - . .. . ,. . _. . . . .. - . , „ . . . • 070 - . . . / 1 1 Attachment A-1 cr _ PROPOSED LANGUAGE FOR 140DIFICATION . OF WAT OEECTION POLICMS , '..! LICHT AND EIGHTEEN . . 'Planning Staff proposes the following arictitIOnal langlsge (underlined) to adopted policy 8. and Ianslage for new policy 18. , II. Oranse County Should adopt a Land Use Plan and associatedregula- . I tions wniah preserve and enhance water auality in protected water- Shds. Certain point sources of pollution-including sewage treat- (.. cent plants, land fills, hazardous waste generators storage ramili a ties or dis;osal sites, and vmjor new hi4mdys should be prohibited from, these watersheds. Urban development including vediumrand higl-density residential, co=rc ial. and industrial uses should be f i . prohibited from University Lace and Cane Creek watersheds. p1.21212.27 i•i t vent which occurs in the ter Eno waterShed incl - commeiiiial and industrial develoament Should be located in conformance with the adopted Land Use Plan of Crenme Count and be able to SatiS all -- 1 tions of 9 --, " Count inc • - those.enacted for water- /I..' 5; _sklection. . A. Orange County Should cooperate with the irtangle J Ocznall of Govern W4 itt.: I vents in the development and implementation of a regional watershed .... prctection plan. The Taunts of Carrboro, Chapel Hill, RillSborough ...!%. -C. , . and Mebane should be encouraged to support the Triansle .7 Comma of Governments watershed protection efforts and to address any exist — ing sources of water pollution. --4 I ...: . ., ,... . .......-,__. . . I . It I I , 67' .p. 1 .., 1 ,.. !..t. I i!Y N. . .N..: 1"‘ 4,1 ;si, ■ . ,..: 1 Attachment 4 .2 . 261 RESERVED 1 *4 . 2 .271 Protected Watershed II (PW-II District a) Intent It is the intent of Orange County to regulate the uses of land and structures in watersheds which I drain to reservoirs supplying. 1 people of Orange County. The quality of water in these water supply watersheds can be affected by the activities of man including farming, construc- *Amended I tion of highways and rural subdivisions and the 7/6/82 growth of towns and industrial development. Types of water pollutants resulting from these activities include sediment, bacterial contamination, heavy metals, synthetic organic compounds and low-level radioactivity. A Task force appointed by the County Commissioners has studied the problems of water pollution. They have documented their findings in a report entitled Report of the Orange County Water 1 Resources Task Force and dated May, 1981 . That statement of problems and needs is included by refer- ence. The intent of the Protected Watershed II (PW-II) district is to apply a set of regulations for watershed protection to portions of water-supply watersheds in the Countr which are presently mostly undeveloped and where- it is desireable to maintain the rural undeveloped character of the watershed in the future . b) Application Criteria 1 The Protected Watershed II (PW-II) district is ' established as a district which overlays other zoning districts established in this ordinance. The new use of any land or any new structure with- lin the Protected Watershed /I (PW-II) district shall comply with use regulations applicable to the Iunderlying zoning district as well as the require- ments of the PW-II district. ,l. This district will be applied to the University 1 Lake and Cane Creek watersheds designated in the Land Use Plan. 1 1 072 6 . 20 . 1 . Ground absorption systems with a design capacity of 3 ,P00 gallons per day or more and package treatment pints for sanitary sewage disposal are expressly prohibited in the AR districts and the Rural Buffer Districts as shown in the Land Use Plan except as may be approved through a Special Use Permit or a Planned Development District . 6 . 21 Existing or New Mobile Home Parks 6. 21 . 1 Existing mobile home parks that do not meet the sten- dazi7ds set forth in Sections 6 . 12 and S shall be con- srdered non-conforming . Such parks shall not expand in I any way , outside the existing developed portions , but shall be allowed to remove and replace units existing at the time of adoption of this ordinance within the existing park . Removal and replacement of lunits shall not be considered expansion of the non-conforming use . 6 . 21 . 2 Nei.) mobile home parks or portions of existing mobile hone parks that have been previously approved but have not had substantial improvements or do not have sewage disposal systems installed on the date of adolption of this ordinance shall meet the standards set; forth in Sections 6. 12 and 5 . 2 . 6 . 21 . 3 Substantial improvements shall include not be limited to , sewage disposal systems , roads , water systems , parking areas and mobile home pads . 6 . 22 Bonus Intensities For Lower-Income Housing 6 . 22 . 1 Intent In order to provide for the availability of affor- dable housing to all segments of the population it is intended that the bonus intensities established in Article 5 . 1 . provide incentive for the develop- ment of lower-income housing. It is further inten- ded that such bonus intensities be used to promote economically mixed housing developments and to con- tribute to the provision of a range of housing type forllower-income households . 6 . 22 . 2 Applicability The IPD-2 intensity regulations established in Sub- section 5 . 1 may be applied to any group housing development or Planned Development whit"), 01, 011 ..._ *6.23 Extra Requirements For Protected Watershed Districts (PW-II) *6.23.1 Stream Buffers Required in Protected Watersheds Within the Protected Watershed District, an area of land along preanial streams shall be required to remain in its natural state, unless the area is subject to serious erosion in which case an erosion resistant vegetative cover shall be established and maintained. Perennial streams are those steams in solid blue on the USGS Quadrangll map for Orange County. *6.23.1 a) Width of Buffer Calculated The stream buffer area X7.1 start at the outer edge of flood plan and be measured a distance of fifty (50) feet away from the flood plain plus an additional distance depending on the slope near the stream. The slope shall be calculated by measur ing a distance 250 feet from the center of the stream, determin lag the average rise in elevation and multiplying that value by four. This value shall be added to the minimum buffer of 50 fei to determine total width of buffer area required. The maximum buffer in any case shall not exceed 150 feet. The flood plain is defined in the Orange County Flood Damage Prevention Ordinary by special survey by registered engineers or suveyors, by the alluvial soil as designated in the Orange County solid survey, or through a site analysis by the Orange County Planning Staff. Slope shall be determined from the USGS Quadrangle map, by on- site measurements, or, by special survey by registered engineer; ! or suveyors. * 6.23.1 b) Development Advisory Committee's Review of Stream Buffers 3 The Development Advisory Committee established in Article 2.4.2, can review the buffer requirements for all develop- ments and may recommend additional buffer area where necessary. *6.23.1 c) ! Permitted Uses Within Stream Buffer Areas The following uses are allowed as a matter or right in stream buffers. All other uses are prohibited. 1. Above ground and buried utility lines for local distri- bution of electricity, telephone, and cable television service, accessory and appertent apparatus such as poles, guy wires , transformers and swtiching boxes . 2. Bona fide farms except any use of farm property for non-farm purposes . 3. Neighborhood utility facilities located within a public right of way with the permitssion of the owner of the • 1 - 07 t • • 1 *6.23.1 d) Stream Buffers Included As Part of Minimum Lot Size Requirements Stream Buffers may be used as part of the required lot area or lot size for residential and non-residential developments. *6.23.1 e) 1 Existing Vegetation In Buffer Areas 1 Existing forested areas or any healthy vegetation can not be removed from a stream buffer except when replaced with vege- tation resulting in comparable storm water run off velocity and quantity one year after planting. *6.23.1 f) , New Ve&etation In Buffer Areas Required New vegetation shall be planted to capture non-source pollutants before they reach the perennial stream, as per applicable Orange County standards. *6.23.3 Reserved *6.23.4 : Impervious Surface Regulated in Protected Watersheds An impervious surface is any surface through which water cannot ' penetrate or can only penetrate slowly. This would include paved paveo, streets and parking lots, concrete sidewalks, and structure which cover land. As a watershed becomes developed, the amount of impervious surface increases causing a decrease in soil ' absorption of storm water and an increase in direct runoff to streams wit a resulting increase in potential water pollution. *6.23.4 'Impervious Surface Regulated in Protected Watersheds In order to promote infiltration of storm water into the 'maximum soil and minimize direct and immediate runoff into 'streams impervious surface rations shall be required in ;Protected Watershed II (PW-II) District. *Amended 7/6/82 , c . i 1 , . •:- - _ _ . ._. . . 1 . * MAX2431 IMPEIVIOUS SURFACE RATIMS - ap GROSS LAND AREA . , . , ZONING DISTR/CT WI RESIDENTIAL I NON..RESIDERr-AL DEVELOPMENT ; AR 22 6.0% 6.0% 22 6.0% 6.0% , Fa 22 6.0% 6.0% 22 6.0% 6.0% R2 24 6.5% 6.5% 26 7.0% 7.0% I R3 28 8.9% 8.9% 30 10.0% 10.0% R4 33 14.2% 14.2% . . Ft5 38 17.0% 17.0% 40 18.8% RB 43 22.0% 22.0% 45 24.5% 24.5r R13 50 31% 31.0% WI 30 10,0% • 11.8% 32 11.8% 11.8% NC2 40 18.8% " 18.8% 42 21.0% 21.0% CC3 50 31.0% 31.0% 52 34.4% 34.4% 0C4 53 35.0% 16.0% 55 39.4% EC5 53 36.0% 36.0% 39.4% 39.4% : . Cr 40 18.8% 18.8% 42 21.0% 2/.0% , 1 I Ei 23 6.3% 6.3% 25 6.3% 6.3% 1 rt 23 6.3% 6.3% 1 35 6.8% 6.8% 12 45 24.5% 24.5% 47 27.0% 27.0% I i 13 50 31.0% 31.0% i 52 34.4% 34.4% 1 AS - 6.0% 6.0% ...... 6.0% 6.0% 1 ED ...... 6.0% 6.0% ..... 6.0% 6.0% PlD 6.0% 5.0% - 6.0% 6.0% ArracHriur c 07 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 14TTLSBOR°UGH NORTH CAROLINA 27278 p. oist9 frr 0 Eit • -4 5- __ - 7' • _ 0,40.00 MEMO TO : Don Willhoit-Chairman, Water Resources Task Force FROM: Fred Luce-Planning Staff DATE: August 11 1982 RE: Update on the Status of Implementation of the Water Resources Task Force Report Here is a summary of BOCC action to date on the Report's recommendati and some suggestions on additional actions necessary to complete Board consideration of the Report. 1. The first recommendation calls for adoption of a policy to minimize outflows of water from one major basin to another. It suggests that this policy could adhieved in part by managing withdrawals and dis- charges in a so that a balance is achieved. The BOCC has already taken action in concert with this policy. The Board request for a Jordan Lake water allocation advised the Office of Water Resources that water was flowing from the Neuse to the Cape Fear basin via Orange-Alamanc System's pipe network and via an emergency pipeline between Hillsborough and Chapel sill and that our projections show the amount..will increase in the future. The letter suggested that the Environmental Management Commission should consider returning that water to the Neuse from Jordan Lake when it decides on allocation. A number of water users outside the Cape Fear Basin, including Raleigh, have requested water from the Jordan. The question of inter- basin transfers of water is sure to arise as the Environmental Management Commission considers an allocation formula for the Jordan. Their actions may help clarify State policy in this area and give the BOCC some pre- cedent for taking is position on this issue. 2. The second recommendation calls for the formal allocation of Lake Orange water to users in northern Orange County. The Rcznnrt chnwo 077 not take into account, however, instream flow recommendations recently suggested by the :State. Lake Orange was financed by a County-wide bond referendum. It has been suggested that there was an agreement at the time Lake Orange was built that the waiter was for Hillsborbugh but no solid evidence of this has come forth. I have checked the BOCC Minutes and the language on the bond referendum and found no language to that effect. Mr. Kenneth Brawn with the Public Works Department has indicated that water has been released 1 or 2 times from Lake Orange each year for the past 5 years.; Water is generally released at open gate for 3-5 days to fill Lake Ben Johnson and then at one-quarter gate to keep a constant flow. The allocatio# of water from Lake Orange is not currently a critical issue because there is plenty of water to go around. Because consideratic of this policy could be controversial, the BOCC might simply want to defer any action to a future time when events make action on this problem more necessary. Action, for examplt, might be necessary if the State decides to implement its instream flow recommendations for the Eno as part of the management of all three reservoirs in the Upper Eno Basin. The recant- mendations in thelReport will still have served the purpose of alerting the Board to this gap in overall County water policy. 3. The third recommendation addresses the need for water conservation in times of drought especially where inter-basin transfers of water are taking place. OWASA already has in place a water conservation plan. The various phases of the conservation plan are triggered by the level of University Lake and the mandatory parts of the plan are implemented by adopted Town Ordinances in Chapel Hill and Carrboro. In recent drolight years the BOCC has passed a resolution encouraging water conservation when the towns took such action, but enforcement mechanisms are lacking for northern Orange if we encounter a more severe drought. To implement this recommendation, the BOCC could direct the County Manager and his staff to obtain copies of the Town Ordinances on water conservation, modify them as necessary into language suitable for the County, and bring the draft document to a future BOCC meeting for review. It would also be necessary to enoourage Hillsborough to adopt such an ordinance. 4. The fourth rec6mmendation has to do with protection of five reservoirs identified in the Report as "prime" sites and worthy of preservation. The Planning Board; modified this recommendation to include two additional sites for preservation. They are sites 17 and 18 in the Report near the County line on thelnorth and south forks of the Little River respectively. In selecting from the 28 potential sites identified in the County, the Report cited four criteria which were used to identify the prime sites . They were (r; Staff feels that the sites added by the Planning Board do not meet all of these criteria. An additional problem with these sites is that they are not within identified protected watersheds. The five sites identified in the Report are. Protected watershed status for much of Little River Township and eastern Cedar Grove Township might be required to protect the quality of water flowing to those two sites added by the Planning Board. For these reasons Planning Staff recommends against the addition of these sites for protected status. The Report asks that County water suppliers identify which of_these sites they would like to be protected. Since the Report is not specific on their obligation to protect the sites once identified they would most likely say they will all be needed eventually and should all, therefore, be protected. The problem of protection would fall tb the County for 4 of the 5 sites since it has planning jurisdiction where they are located. The remaining site, site 4, (raise the dam on University Lake) is mostly in Carrboro's planning jurisdiction. The Lake is surrounded by Universit: owned lands for which there are currently no development plans. The pro- tection of this site is therefore less difficult than for the other sites which are in private ownership. If and when Cane Creek reservoir is approved it would drop from the list of prime undeveloped sites. If the BOCC is serious about protecting three sites , then it should request Planning Staff to identify more specifically the area that would be inundated by these reservoirs and to suggest zoning language and other measures which could be used to protect them. Two of the better sites are in Cheeks Township and the use of zoning for protecting them would require the zoning of Cheeks Township. - 5. This 4s. the recommendation on reserving water from Jordan Lake. The Counth has already acted on this recommendation, 6. This recommendation has to do with conservation of water. It is broader than recommendation three in that it would be an ongoing conser- vation effort not one applied only in times of drought. The County already promotes water conservation by enforcing the North Carolina buildingcode which requires low volume toilets and low flow faucets and showers for new construction and retrofit. There certainly will be opportunities in the future for the Board to promote a policy of water conservation. Planning Staff suggests that the Board adopt a policy to promote water conservation and act on the policy in the future as opportunity arises. 7. This recommendation calls for adopting a land use plan which identifie protected watersheds . The BOCC has laready acted on this recommendation. 8. This is the recommendation which suggests adopting a land use plan and associated regulations which prohibit medium- and high-density residential development as well as commercial and industrial uses form protected watersheds with the exception of certain parts of McGowan Creek sub-basin. It also states that development should not hp inn - 41-$ This recommendation has been followed in the Land Use Plan. A portion of the McGowan Creek sub-basin is the only area within any of the protected watersheds where development at urban densities is pro- posed (see attached maps) . This recommendation is one of the more controversial in the Water Task Force Report. Prohibiting development in University Lake and Cane Creek watersheds !is probably acceptable because there is less pressure for the types of !development prohibited. Chapel. Hill and Carrboro have ---- ample room to grow north and-south so that this- proposal will not restric their development,. The Cane Creek area has no prospect of being sewered in the forseeable future and so is not liable to have this typd of devel- opment whether on not it is restricted by County policy. The Upper Eno watershed is different because Efland is an existing community in this watershed with development potential because of the presence of Interstate Staff suggests a couple of alternative amendments to the Land Use Plan for Cheeks Township which could address the people about this recom- mendation in the Report and still maintain future water quality. Map A (attached) shows the .. ea- around Efland' and west to near the County line. The transition areas now existing in the Land Use Plan are shown in solfid orange and yellow. Map A proposes adding a ten-year transition area (arange stripes) which includes the Efland interchange and land just to the south of West Ten Road. A possible industrial transition node is shown centered on the Efland interchange. Currently no access is allowed along the connector between 1-85 and US 70. As part of the upgrading of 1-85 , however, that length of highway will be extended west and connect to Willing Road at the interchange. NC DOT personnel feel that some access along the road will then be possibl The Hillsboraugh 201 plan shows the Efland area being sewered by a line running along US 70. This is a very inefficient way to sewer Efland because US 70 is almost right on the ridgeline between Seven Mile Creek and McGowan Creek Isub-basins . A sewer main on US 70 then would require that all laterals to it be pumped. A more efficient way to sewer Efland would be with a maim along McGowan Creek allowing gravity flow of sewage. This would also liit service across the ridge in Seven Mile Creek because of the cost of pumping. Development might be limited to industry which could bear the cost better than small commercial or residential uses. The second alternative (Map„18) includes additional 20-vear transition area in the northern portion of 'Seven Mile Cteek-sub-basin to just south i West Ten Road. Additional 10-year transition near Mebane (out of the watershed) is alsotincluded. This might be considered the maximum devel- opment plan for Cheeks and would allow sewer, water and industry all along the interstate in Cheeks Township 9. This item recommends that the other Government bodies who have juris- diction in the watersheds we are seeking to protect also implement water- shed protection measures. As an update, Carrboro has formed a watershed protection task force which has been meeting for about a year_ r h.,. 1,-, ' ! ------ �� ` ! , ! . | K� C� �� Hillsborough appointed a sub-committee to review the Report. The sub-committee has reported to the Town Board and the Board is considering hiring a consultant to review parts of the Report. Planning Staff have contacted planners in Chatham and Alamance counties and they have indicat a willingness tolbring watershed protection before their Town Boards. Before further progress can be made on this recommendation, dae Report needs to be adopted so that the other jurisdictions can be convinc of our seriousnegs about protecting public water supplies. 10. This recommendation asks,:county utility providers to adopt policies of nonextension to protected watersheds except for the McGowan -Creek OWASA has two representatives (Doug Terry and Pat Davis) on the Carrboro water tash force and they seem to understand the need for such a policy and agree Oith it. If they reflect the feelings of the OWASA Boar, then implementation in University Lake watershed should not be a problem. The Cane Creek area is so distant from any sewer and water utilities that such a laolicy is meaningless for its watershed. The adopted Land Use Plan allows for sewer and water extension to Efland and if the plan is amended to show additional transition areas as suggested earlier! intthis memo, then all of the area there with densities to support such utilities would be exempted from this provision for the Upper Eno watershed. Staff supports adoption of this policy. 11. This is the recommendation calling for extension of zoning to protecte watershed areas. lExtension to Bingham and Hillsborough Townships as recommended in the Report has already occurred. Planning Staff supports extension_to the Upper Eno watershed areas in Cheeks and Cedar Grove Townships. 12. This recommen8ation calls for the adoption of larger lot sizes 'and impervious surface ratios for protected watersheds. Maximum impervious surface ratios for protected watersheds have already been added to the Zoning Ordinance. 1 While very low density development in public water supply watersheds seems a desirable 1measure to protect water quality, there is not a good technical base frcim which to choose and defend a particular large lot size Based on documented probleus with ground absorption septic tank systems on one acre lots in tihe County, a larger lot size in protected watersheds seens desirable for protection from dais one aspect of pdllution. Larger lot sizes also haVie benefits in terms of reducing the ultimate potential population in a watershed. The Carrboro water task force is proposing a two acre minimum lot size for areas near Uni'versity Lake and a one acre lot size for more distant areas . 1 In the absence of a technical base for large lot sizes , the decision becomes one of political acceptability. Planning Staff suggests a ndnimum lot size of two acres for protected watersheds which is consistent with the sizes of lots currently being created in w.1,,Q1,,A | -----~� � . 1 ^ | �� � � �«�� 13. This is the' recommendation about stream buffers. It has already been implementedlby the recent watershed zoning amendments. 14. This item rcommends that lots bordering on perennial streams have a second usable absorption area identified in case o al ure in e firs area. It also recommends a monitoring and maintenance program to indi- - — vidual wastewater, disposal systems. are not too great. It's my understanding that the Health Depa=ment trie to identify au area for an additional septic field on each lot it approve even though this not a requirement of the code they enforce. The maintenance propdsal has COMB up before and the problems of implementatiol have been discussled, at least informally, by the people in the Health Department. If the BOCC believes there is merit to this recommendation, then the2 ought to request Oat the Health Department review these proposals and report back to the Board on the feasibility of implementation. 15. This is the recommendation for the adoption of stormwater management measures in protected watersheds. At its meeting on July 6 , 1982, the Board requested that Planning Staff prepare a report on what specific stormwater management measures will achieve the disired results and staff's technical ability and avail- able time to implement such_neasuras. Staff will probably report to the Board on this item on September 7, 1982. 16. ThiE-recommeddatian speaks about continuing the County's strong sedimentation and lerosion control program and sponsoring a "Back Creek" project for University Lake and Cane Creek reservoirs. If the Board sees merit in this recommendation, it could direct the County Staff to aacertain the availability of funding and procedures for obtaining fuading an Orange County. 17. The last recoMmendation calls for the County to establish an action plan for dealing with spills of hazardous wastes in watershed areas. The State hasl recently developed a plan for dealing with hazardous waste spills called'"State Emergency Response Plan." They will be working with local officials and should have contaCted Bobby Baker by this timP . The Triangle J Council of Governments has recently received a grant to develop a hazardous waste response plan for the region. Staff supports this recommendation and recommends working with the above organizations to develop a County plan of action. 1 E • I i .. ATTACHMENT D • t . ,.^ �• try 1$t, 1982 i Su zE Xy of i c j Sr, visiai , i'i ty " .i.n Protected Watersheds to mMay_ $ _ ' oh..X978 _ . . r *IP•.. , 1G��ry♦y�' +�„ ,..w� • r•t +1 x i •: Aw ^ • - I •• • Y R R f.Y `r.n.i.�•.�-''..`.. „•a'y Iy:�,fY_1`y')'i��'-.�,•.WL , .L•,. ��',, M1 �' . •y M '"w+n. �yrt•'''‘..:*'''";w,:,•"*.n :.:I.rw, `ww.+•F.tw .,^. «'w4 Sa„�;:_nMS':r�„ C11 S ' qy,n...;� lot sizes. .. . . . 6" .i_ ���M V . n, _ 3 1.50 2 "-..-0,- � .: ' . 1: r -••,-+'Pt{ ,,,,,,„=-_,-.,",:;.:::.;,-..: _f .2. ♦ '>«i+,.�.:,�.:. /" ;,;,r L r�r r..••� .,�rE�•z 1•Y;r�` • �'R -- 2••+ ia ~ � ",-.4.,,":"...-•, . .J-:1'•t: .wI.. .... --1.2 • ,r S::l�l :l^.�i'r arw k �:,♦ _, r • r y q« Ml.. • J 1. ^^+• . e r t i ;. '7 -•., % 4,.-.-7”;d -R • .� a-r .r,. ` 'fi «. „.-. , • i !r.:` --.4 02 -. , •'...• .... P . . • . : - j r rj,� a:r r;••• ',;,.2"1"..1r•i 1 4'11.1.:'.5;'. k' a, r ` ' ',P �A •• •2" .• 1 • n..Jw ,'rte:1•:y"'` :` � y■il.!":•-: M. -•..Jy. .... . .� .r.• . „ ./ e 3.M ": r....w`♦;i7: ,k.y � .. ;:c t: ` .j s.�r: :� '. r :„..„„:,...,,„,•.,„,..,:-...,: �'�' w Zi_+ :•y ;. .. `' a � 'a 9 qh .`k t N : :'-a•`i r wsr w.i7'� ,*• E':ia7, •i ". ,... , ' ,r. •• 1 ✓z: S + G=' : : �Y .,x , r { .-74'...7,-;..1..:•:.":-. ":.•, ^ir.'= :t1. . ..^:t ' d '.'••r w.✓r: " „C� 3.'v _ +4': •c� y G3 .'"' 2 . 44 •..+'-� ; ' r •`a q-.„.;.,-......,•:.:,•,•P . ►. - • ' ~n: ;?:,-.4...:::::-.=.-„;.:„;-",-i-.. .:,-,,, ^r • • Ste 14.9 ::ti 'r . , : 9i. :" 7 f rt ' ,\r.• };. ih•'•' zw:1 -r : - • � _s w"",r .tE y ^� d `" :F•z:c.;�.: • n'. r ir• ' > i 2.-24 .4! ' } .. ., •y ry � r'r i ♦ .w:::.+.. J 9 .il..- .::;, •M ,1229 Y• Y ° ",'.:.. Y.. ps:: t . 7- E ., i y ,•`'L =: MJ Jo- ;: •: 'W ]}, M k ` r•.r . i' .`: v '; tom "4'...../..,‘:'-.7-.7,•„:.., ` ,r .' r a . ~Iv _ :-.. r,+ ' �U�i .. -.1 .r`".t . .,1,4. O� ..r :;:,,..,„;.;:::+;..")..., :^.T, N vK- ,ti`'. ::.wi :, , ', a4±^ 1." . r " _ z t iC;R•'Ss-,....4.- z:;:1-t . ia .n r ! I :'..• i 90 °'F`: rr e2::?-.t, ,. r ,9 - •„. , r ''7..:'..•'..:,;:.,:s:.:.',...•.- e: ,•4 � x . N r ^”r"•, y., : ° 1. , .J. \ 257 .: . 7 1, u , • , = y^x•- t,,. Y X•i_ 76- ^ ^ • L", ' -j'-'; - W ; ''-r`.tii_,1 s i t , •j ,« .�`' •MM iw i 6t ....-•-••• 5.6a .r' I J:=,-.-:: t. 3 1 , ; 1, E E E E i' L • May 1.8, ?982 .� . s • _ 2 Q • Saatt xy of Irt 5ubdivi..s:%•cm 1ctirvi ty " • in Protected Watersb - - `i ICh 1978 _ - ' y 19s - n Universityl Lake'Watershed Iii.' w SLtdiv ' 1i7i 7 VC1 .''y;. "J •i•v;"• ! :y "" :":;"; +,' !^:*':2• ,r ^ . 1979 •• , . .:,:e).27:. Mme:; } -,..•_„.. . .. " ,.. ... .. � -_: 't... Y-'i'^;. ,'• ..,c,":,w:=•r+.+• Fr.'3f ;5V►.IY .» . ;'..,;7::;.;.,-•,,,:r.-`..:::. ., ;>. :'a•.- 30 ;r— t;*-%.. ,fit,' .. 0 •x . " ':n = A,; - ' . 'f' ."- ''e;. ^' E•y 'R,ldi" 'y M 0.24 . 4 0 /r ss.r ' ..... - , r:.': : . .^... - ..C:','r '▪•.,.f.• •�k''T•Yi�t`-j,':nM'�•�+='';f""'.• �' .r,'•L a^ti..:--.I•::'.r �,-«..,• r v'r:.-;;T:::: t4 ` T. .5-j , 4...t ,J'' it:. .L. .. • . : 4h M+r 4 6.86-t.;:::, .yIMV^ - , . 1 .,t „ 1.59 =" _ x.:72� 7,,,...,,i--' ;; , .^ �r F t - K Yni r .1;65 G • � f 7r7 i .{ ; Q. ' �_ '--t..-,..4..,::` e, ....2 3 + n j y : �^ , 'a;. ... s} .-..! .'. 5 78- toi.; .._ ••rt r - _ • *': ','.:% •"«`'te"r:: — ., ..! ,, f _r! :,; , r r �+.•-:, :1 5.3 L 4 i % "''i - 1.66 _ r _, :;~` .:_ .3.90 - .. _ . F r - 11.9 x" 5;93 . . 388 .Y r 'f 31.12. " .♦: . - ` .Y } - ' 1 !83 . ; ' 1.50,,f 2 ... �•E Y yy -ry T V n• €€. r 1 0 i , t 1 __. . 1, May 18, 1983 Page 3 ( Summary of Recent Subdivision Activity in Protected Watersheds - March 1978 to May 1983 University Lake Watershed - Minor Subdivisions III of Lots, total acreage lot sizes 1981 2 3.49 2.22 1 .27 3 5.35 1 .09 3.03 1 .23 2 3.88 1 .92 1 .92 4 6.90 1 .42 1 .67 1 .85 1 .96 1 0.99 0.99 1 3.02 3.02 1 2.0 2.0 1 1 .0 1 .0 1 2.07 2.07 1982 1 - 5.10 5. 10 2 11 .92 5.96 2 10.01 5.01 1 1 .0 1 .0 1983 1 60.6 1 .757 1 28.666 .928 1 ; 1 73.34 2.251 2 10.676 5.338 2 9.50 4.75 1 54.08 1 .0 University Lakie Watershed - Major Subdivisions 1978 1 10 AMMIIIIMOMMUMM May 18, 1983 Page 4 Summary of Recent Subdivision Activity in Protected Watersheds - March 1978 to May 1983 University Lake Watershed - Major Subdivisions of lots total acreage lot sizes 1978 9 50.33 6. 12 6. 17 5.07 5.03 5. 13 5.57 5.90 5.57 5.17 1979 3 19.5 6. 13 5.92 7. 12 8 16.58 2.0 2.25 2.0 2.19 2.0 2. 14 2.0 2.0 1980 28 80 1 .0 1 .6 1 .9 2. 1 2.3 2.7 2.7 3.0 2.4 2.6 3.3 3.5 2.8 3.2 3.8 4.9 5.5 3.9 2.3 2.2 1 .4 -100.• May 18, 1983 Page 5 Summary of Recent Subdivision Activity in Protected Watersheds - March 1978 to May 1983 University Lake Watershed - Major Subdivisions of lots total acreage lot sizes 1980 6 11 . 18 2.59 1 . 16 1 .25 1 . 13 1 .29 1 . 17 6 13.78 2.09 2,59 2. 19 2.58 2.20 2. 19 2.53 1981 2 2.22 1 .0 1 .22 15 41 .57 1 .98 2. 19 4.66 5.43 3.83 2.28 1 .95 1 .31 1 .52 2.05 2.06 1 .91 2.29 4.02 4.09 7 8.5 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 1 .88 6 26.54 2.00 2.00 5.02 7 A, ., • I I 1 I I 1 1 - I • I . ..„.. . ._ ... . ... .. - - ---- . _. . .. - 1 - May-18. f. -.,19.. 82. 1 I P.;19a 6 " („ - • • ' I SU=CY of Recent subdivisun ActivitY .. , in Protected Water-aleds -.1-1arda 1978 • 'I to " AaY,.. 1.947-'7' - . . - . twer. Erloi ilartshed, - lantar. Subdi' ViSiOnS ',. -7., .." i'•„.::::. '"-:7::'„. 7,-,,.'.,..:. *:,;:'--' .7-,.,' , " . •-• I - -- ..• I a • Ix of :Lots : : total acreage .., .• -;-.........s4,-.,,,: lot;sizes, ,. ,7. . • .. • -..- .. • . ,.., , ... • ...,, , . „ . 1972 " 1-- - , ... - „,.. - -L5O. " -.,••:'••••::.•.•-,-..,. •..-:-•,, .4i.;•,.:2::..•,. .,,, .1---,, - '-'..-,:''''c''-'''.''••'•••"7i::;'+....•-.:,-".;5;:•::::7:7,. .. „",.:i•:.,•..,::,:-i•.....7...,:--;-.,:1.:;*,;:..,'..7.:.;.;..:".,.3..«".:•." ' • - ' :. , , 9 7da ; . - , '4.m.-.7::E:,.;1.;....;...Y.-..,.-:0-4..i.■•6-,-,-1-,,', ,•-'- :.g.40 . 3 c . L1i5.i , .44 .Z-r; 4.25 1.„.,.::.:-.y...,...,.:.:, ...-........•.,.,.--. , . .. ..,,,, s,„,.. .•r. .3.,.. ,...•••;•,.;. ,•1,',......„;;::.: ..4.,...3- ...;:xi-Dca•-„,---,•';-,v4•..:i.:•-.4-..'7,;•!.„2.7.-,...--.",;,..:-,'..;•"-?,..•,,?.,:-..--L'';:;."-,..i.: .11„pit..'-•••'• : ::':•:',.:':-:::',.: -- : ,..,:......., .. , .......-..., -... - 1.,•-•-17.•„, .,..4.. ...,„_ ,...•.,;,,,...),:,.....,,..:;•:1„7:-.....„.....‘t • • •-;;;',..„:,•-„r„,,,,..t..-::••••••,....7,........:-..14,,y-47t2z...••-• 2.02. i-7.-••••:•••_‘.,...' .•:;1",:••••• • - „.„...„., •• - ' •.:., Z.•••: ' . 1. s'. " . •3, --. -""::',.... 77 .:;.....-:.'.z' .:-.:.' 2.02-.-:-.. i.,.•-..ri4.:::..y,,,%.%,,•-v,:v-,12,7-,:,,,‘, .•,... .:. '..,.:,..-:....;...; , ..,; --:.&-: .---- 4-...•:,.,, -',',-• ',„-..."•.C.,::..7'1,7.."-;It„.- ":-.1.%;„...:•:'',....1".-r'.--.. . ' , '' '''7 •...,„-,........,..:,-,....: .....4.:,....p,„. .:., .:,-, :,....... •,. -_. t........--.ri--",.."'-•.,,:r-4.;.,-....- -,"7.-,,,:".!•• "". . .'"- - . "" '•-•-'•'•;'. '.:-.--;-•.',".-,0•,'‘.7'-';'-k.47•",•:`.="..."-4"..-7-':1/4::.7.'.7.1:',...*:...1:,..r.-E-...,„... -. "-..- ;":_ --,....-:... ' - .. .. .., , , r.le----..„,4:-.„-;:.-...,:,.; ".:,:..f.,.. : ,;,.. 2.3:. • ..,e,....:: ,..-; 3979 4 , . - .1. • '...': :•.•:::,-...-.„4-:.':-F-'7,'-'-."--7-2102..7'..i-r.t:74.:. •...:,-;5---- .•-,,-------- 5,-. -:220,--.... ,....,--,,,'-.. ... . . ''; ;•„';',', „.*:.....:';04-.." `:,•%,41,trt .,..g."4:,..75'''.."""`. ,1.44- :*.J.:...,*,•.4.,;■ ;: : ' .; ''.'s::'''.. ' • . ' - -.:` :.': .: ' '-4-.":''. 7-*..1:::: . .• '..'...4;."•:'1.:."'.'i,...,=';',", ...,' 24,4-4 ."1:774:'7;`:T7.-..4i7?•.7•V.: :`,.:7-";gi'i',7:4:7•."..". ...L.......i ;..L, '' * : * '': : ; , -• " -1 ,, -- - . ',; 2 :-. - . "a:,.,..:.'...... 2-...l.......,:;9..53 2,...--;;..f:;.--1.;:!;:,:i4fS.S$7'ty..".".:?::`::::.:L.::::..;tr..,-..' '''-' .5.:83 i'-7i.,•:;..-:...---,::::::1 ---: . .. '''..'..-.•..:':.'''.'•:'.'",;......4:.-.• •-'..:-. -'.1: .r-''.•..'"-'L::''.''.''..4..'.--'.:-''!":.F''.:....-''-'*''-'4.'. .L 1 I ' '.'..I:, '. .: - ''.-.....:''.-.J...:.'. ,r,.7:..:7i:^,;'.,..,'..?4 i-:t,. t4:'-,-,'t.4.;. 1'-4;:-..'..r'1::.•) 7..""- 1•..:.;7.■..-'.,174-`.:-..;:;:.%:.4•,::.t,'7r,•:-:;:":!:,.';:,'',.•,....7-,..1.■Z:•''-•'::-:;-;,..:.'.:-•'.•'r;."'",.:,-::.:•-7-.1'4r7:171t.':..,; ,:•:.z:14, :,1":,:''!.=r:.!4f:.",;-i,::.-'.::,....:7...'N:.3....... .:7a..1.i.:in 3. , , % g.67 ": ' "'! " 1 •bq 3" " 8"37 7 -:•= _ - - 4.46.'..',.f-.7'-;'.,V'':.?'.."i''•.-'c':':,.':.7":,:-'-';':_,-•„"-"..'.*„-•' -, ,. .1;1=- ....:1:,-:::-.;:-; ._;,- ::.......%''.', 'it''':-. ,, .„;.. ,, ‘:::„-.?'‘'....,..; :-;" :. :- :,.• '.'-',.,.:---. •--':',1-,....':I.4.-,:i 4.i-.:..7.:SV.?;.'::?4,-.4;;A:;:";75" irt;.-7.:-:::,";.:•.-;Vt:,..',I-_-; . .*• -,1"..?;-.'rk"; . l.','" -.:4-•:::=",i.."4.1.1:1".::::7'.••••4 ''"' - '': ' ..--..:.;'k..31`,:: t• ..'; ' `"...',.47,1.'..;4','.., ;'''.- .%.:•:: ",..'.'! .:,' ' ',',,,..t.' ,....''.:7,1' .,:‘, ■7:".;:r:-,..i4...: ;47:1 .7,,•..;!•:";:'•1--ni'...::,7-,,k,;,;:,.--,-.,- r.?....... ,7.: ,n,'..- a-:,, ,7.- . 7-.;:''.';';' `.1,'':".T.•"41-':'"-:.'",..t7.•••)..;22,4:::-e.t!...-7.?-7.1i:4,*I:i:'''''.'. .".f..- Z.71..t:?::::.";;;;"7- 7.'7■7''') <C.,.., . '.4-••-.„-; -^ .'•- -:' 1.;•t:.••••-",-. -•-•' :,r5 ';'•"" ';':•:,!,.., ••••,7*-•'-,!:...r.. -',.,.. - „..,.;,..•!.... ••..,-.',I."••:::-;•?.!0..:.--7■-,:.!'..,:,....'r'-',-: ...',,+.44';;;;;;,..1,-,;,,,r,"::15....;-7-;•`„74.----474tg';'‘,:- :`,tit 4,4 ...,.....,.r.,'..,,,,s7.,..i.i.,..,...t.:7-,' `i.- .-1,- • "4;77-'.... -',7. ! '"":''-'.7''.:"•!:.--.:'‘..'-.. ‘'' ' --.).: 1.1...."';:'',7...:'. ' `.'"*....r.,'.%1:1!1:4"'... ..:•...: ! .4:4,1v:.;', 1.-7•'»v..-...-:7:;:.:'»..?.',1);;4..,'.:tn.!:.':-..t.'"ft-'=::'-ft•us*"e.:•.v..t...''-'. '‘-";,..f -• .s!.....*.:.‘'.;:.''.:..,:,:';'.....; St...,4-:',.'?-•...77...t.':";:',-.:f./,-",.,, ' :!.., •1', '..' -: ..:,... '''.;:..... -7.'..7'.".;.;, ...-;:.:',;....-..., ..,.i,;%•,„....4..q_.,,,,v-,..... i.441 .1:::-.;..-itt I ln.•••.,...";...4... ..•• ::.::•,,;;;•-•;,,,,....,, ,......,...,,,,, T., .i-_,.;r:',.,;71,,,,,,:l 4,..,;:. .: J.' :%..',, ';'."::7-..•..::.•,,... ....,...,,- ;.j......t.y..:.-t -.- -14::).±:; -,,..;ff.i. .r.1.,!..c.:,-,r.;;!:. ...-,..7.:::-....:,,..-t• ,t,:.i.,4...ir: :,.,,,. ...;',. •,...,,, '...*,,,?...,;:l-,,.1,. - •.; , 7'•,„; ,,, .' :., .....:,..;.„7,..,:i7 ,i-,,,.. n it 1,-....,,,.......7.,:rfl :-.;,, ,:`.7.t.,...,4, ..t ...,';5;0,„..,.....;,,,.:,:-. :...-...., .. :.:.':...'.:1-:".-... ,...4 :: : ,,.,.„...--. i,:.''.::.:... :-.>. +-..,,,A..,,:- , ..--,,i;-... - .....,...',...7., ..-, '.:. -.'.1,:::,.': - - ,'.,,,-•:.:i:: •::::•,.. ! ..:.-' :',: .tr.:-..;-, ',.: ' -..,...•.'..' ..,:i '' ",-•., •"ei"'!--;-- -'...■';!:--'11."::*:•;''''r:. 7'... ,.•.---...7,' ,'-,":',9 -.:- ,4-* --- - : -•- :-'1:'.....7.- .' . 1 „..-.7. .i. -..-.. . , , 7„,, ,,, ,••.-r„,./A:A-.....1..,,',.1,.....,•.1.-4 V:.--;"*. ..,...--7 c ,*:---„-...;.1.- ft .-%`.-:- :' : • . 1 s.:.:;„,,.- .7- .- - •- r..-::;:'.,-, ,, - , . -; • . ' i r , - -''' .. 7 ' 2...0......: .-'-::::".....-'.-'::,-,...-,',-I.,..,-..:-.:'-,-;:.-...!.. ,..a.u 1 - . . L:,..: -- •. .,F, ..,-...;-,, ,... ,, ..3., ' .• . ',. ..,• , :..,-."-;4_':--,...,..,. : .: •••:. 1:0.;.,,.'"tf.::$;,:yA*J",:■;‘,...:;.,....'...47;. ,V...', : , . :'.. .,,L...11.1.,r;...:,4'..,'.a'.....r. !...._„ :. .''...-'•: '''',,,i '..: ',..-2•0 ":.-''t 7.7-......".... ,-.....--..,...:%;."--.1......7.-i......,:. 243 •••• •'..,•"7, . ,I...,,,,..,-;•,,,,„t.: -.. , :.„... .---,--,-.: ,, '...,,--., :...,..,. .. . . -.. ...:.,..•-...:",,- ....,,-',: ..., -'7,4;,"..f1;•4•,,,t:i2,-;,,.":,:l.„--„,'-i;' ft .A' :.`.*:•,-7 ' . ' - r ...:."..*:".,47.-:-:'.: ' . ,,., .,' ..':, "':*••.1 , ,:' . 1 .. L, r : 7:-:,....:z- „ ...... .j..„.4),,n....,":.:7,7:::,..:".-ir.,,;,...,..:-,,,-.:- f,; 4;.::.,...474:,L....;:„,,,,..L.i..... ,,,:::.,:!1,.A.,::::,.. .,. ,, . , ....., ,`,r•.;;;, ,, . .,„., .'' • . , •.." '- ••I'17 2'''''- .'"..:-.''.:•:**....,'..:•'.•.:.ry '41,-.7."..:':.-;!..'7....,;': ,-.!,..-e-ti::::::1';':::1-.....,,,;^,,•;,;.:S! :•'4',•."_;.') n 1 -:, -. :-.....F. ,-,. -.:. :.,:,4•.4ii..--:.. z.•,v',r4;,'...*:;:..7:7,..7::-:;:i. .11.1.::‘,...t...'-t*..1.-.7. ..."..,4»,..!..,:".**0.w .;,• ... .7:-: ..t ,.. , t ::..ril..1.-,:?.:-,, : 1..' L,...',.....,,:. L,i ,:.::,,t :: r, :...i,.,. ',.:,'Z.:',.:,:.?•,,.f.,......!:::::„.2...,,AA,'::::;,,1•.:::::::J?:::•",■1:::: :'1,.. .a,..,;.f:.r,., ,,F.I.::::.: 4.4)„,"'.4 ';:-..'...!..-... i"-c.• ',..--:"- 4...,,..;-',4- .-. -::-.".•- - ..-,• .-.,•:•.,.. • -;.- .•;.•. 4-,.. :.' • :,.- ,,.,...-, -..i...-t,...• ,•c,„.4..T4i-.- .,..,i.:7;' 't •:..*.......;,;:-..;:');;.;-...,r ,....,- 1.7,'.,..,. .....,.. ...j...r,-".-. .):: ' ; :- ' ',-. .::..•,...:.... ..•.-.... .. ' " '.'!... -:.- .: • .Y.:63 99....,.....„,-,„'...74,,---- • '..:•-A,...,,....• ,.----:. -0. .1980 :' .4.,--'- 1.- ''. "l•2 ''.- . ,:. ,• ,..... .-,,-,::. .., ..•....„,:•?„.".,:r,••.. '!.:•••••.:-..,7-4-.."-......,...i.,!. - .:.,_ ..._ ,i. .,..„., , . ....: ,.....-,,,,,,..-„•,,.,.:,...,,, ,:7.•ie..,.r..;.,•?!.'..-:-::-..f.',::...::::..:-T. .,•;7.,-."..'.?!;,-"'....7, '-:--,-1 41.•''' .•-' -- :-:-.4.,-;;;..,,,.,:!.. ; ....: t '..., %...., :.'-1•'.,e,,t:3.',•.•f:.;-••.,-.3:::','A-,•f•.1„-:::::::.:::::::;,•.9":::.;:,:'--,`„,-V":,".,'7',"'.'',..'''•'',...:_L.:,,;";:..".;,..•_,','.,4.,. ,-"-,`, T'.;''.„'-.:.."1:':,',:'=-:''.-.''•....',-'•,'.:.';,,..":.,*-,'-:'*.:...7..,.r".',::".;:''.'.':'";....f';1.'',.„..`'.!i'."'',.':''.,':-.%...'.1,'::::'-:-"..".7-.,::i;.:':.'..-2'-'.,,. `:' ':'.,. ...'..-s'I-..I.'.:.:;.-..',',".'".":,'":':.'..-'"':.-7."..;..;*z,:':•'*.,....'.‘4'.,..1.:74':'......•.,,.:'r,17:;':'.','2W,..•'••'".u1.i,:. - .;""V....:',.!,1:-....4-..:,-7.,..-!..:.;",.-1-' C;l*1.,;;,,',.';-,.',,',.",:e."..-.r.?-,''-:1:•:,i.-.;‘-.;.;:r,*":...,:.?;..;•-7Y-."i,',:.....-„ 4i....•-A ? '. " ''' .7 , iF4 ?, - - j 8 059 i , 6.10 1:,^fr..,-:,,--..::•-.•.•,':):.-,%-:-*•••.:..:.,.•,•..•:.,...'---"- .., ..; ;::::,••;.7::..;..,,`,-.::?;,',,',,',...;'',4',,'7.r,3....!,''',..4,10'.i..;.▪1.':.,..?;.:i....■;-: ..;.r..."1..f,....';1'...:'!".',1:'i: ;a:12 ...-;;:i.lfrerli.. ,. . -.. - •.'" - ':.".:` ^'!':-'.,, -, :,,.1-,, , ', .1 :.;• 1.Al...r:.2::414;" . - ' ,,: r e, .,.... :, . .', ... • . • , .. .. .'. 1.':''.....:.:■1%:(;..;L:!•,...;'::;'':',.%‘,':!.:',7■i.. ..'..,...%:4Y.: . ,r,:."?..•., _:'.' -, .:71,,r.::,'',,,,'.1...,..N t.i..,., .:',..,,',....,:C..4..1. ",",..1.7%....l: .,..»...1%....-',.!",:.:7-:'.;1.17 . '••-i.' ....-. ,...-‘,..-::..... .=.--", ' • --.t.,.: ,....-?.....:-.- • - . . I,':". . .--., . ,,,,,,,. ,,..-, :,,,,... ,;,,,,--„,-,....--„,,,..., - .f.,,L.......;:,:.-.........,......,---;-;.,..,4.1-F.5..4::..0::• •,. !..... .. ,r,,,,,i7.7.::.::':,7,- • : . ',- ,..'.. .: -; ."',.7,::.' •- :, • .: ,,,,;;:-..,i,,::':•-,, ...:,Irt.1 .:'.....":.-:::;-:::' „:.,,,,-,1,,,x,.,..f.C.:-.y: 7..''. 8.02 • :...„ . • . _ - • 2 • - •• •• - -- ••,.4,"4''''.; ...-'"',''....■":;':::':!.. ' %':::,:;:•,,.:'',-.1. . ' '..147'.:;c'. ' • , ;, '. I . 't:':'''.:'',:'.:':'.:"'1''.::%!.''''; '',‘:.r':*).7::::::'*:',‘.:■;'''::.:.. ;,*:r::'.''....7'..".,:.1*.lt•.'..:.f'::.*:.':n'..\' ..2,0 0 ...• .. ■ , . ' , • " 6 62- :''''-' ' --'-, ' .1.-• ' ":'-'•-;'' 1„...0 ..'':,-.7'r,-..••:' ' - • ,..,'?.. .,'...:. :•;•,:'''..,,e;::•7;,.. ..,,,:'-' ::::..' ,:r . ..•,::."-•..-•5.62 . ,. '' • ' - ' ' • ' -: '• - • -.' . '''''..1,....-Y-.......,.-.'4.'.' l'--X' 1.:" ., , ; ...,"" .•1'.' ,..:.„. -.-. . . .....-..-.:-...,:i -.:„7,,.' ' - , ;(':"4"1...:Z.:;•'f.1.:'''''";'"5".':. . ':, . '. .., r i,■., .'.., .,. , .229 47,-:,,,:,......,j:..,,:,.,......:,:,Le.,..i -,,i ± ,-,. 4.78 :,..,-,,, • .. : •.;.;,....,.;i• ••.•;".: .••-. . , - .•,..,.•::::,':--,...., -- •. .•,::••: -.• •...„1,, : : • :- ••:: :-:•,.f.::;...7.::-....:..... . .4...t,- -...; ... -..:-..,-,. .,....i...4:.--...:.....,... -.1 .''' ....: ' '..- --.,:::"-,..= 191.56-:::::'".:*4'::..;.:?.,::;-%..::: .?. --.;..•.1.;*,,':::.:..-2,30 '''. ' ''''''. 61 92-'---" - ' • ----'- ,"" ••• • •-•, .'•-••••.:•-: 3 34,- • - :. _ . „... , , . .• , . 3; '-::.„-,. . -• -, , . . , .-,, ,:-,...;.-...-;-!;...,--" -- ,_..:-. .:",--. - .. - . - „ . .... . ..., ' - , . -.' -I , , • 2 " ,.. ' : .....-.:-:-. ..:',.' 7.37..."1,'"'-;,,,,....--::.4,:.-:•:-;-1...;_"74.,....1,-,'„„;:r.,......- 5..0 - - • . :' , ;-•;.;:' , :,....--: •::::....,:•, •.. ... : •.::. ••••.•,,,:,;,:.--. - - •••••••• • ; • • •••-- :4,••::./.'..7.*"-''' ' . 1 . May 18, 1983 Page 7 1 08 Summary of Recent Subdivision Activity in Protected Watersheds - March 1978 1 to May 1983 1 Upper Eno Watershed - Minor Subdivisions I # of lots total acreage lot sizes 1981 ) 3.54 3.54 il 1 .0 1 .0 3.85 .92 ill4 .92 .92 1 .26 11 7.65 7.65 11 2.0 2.0 3 7.93 4.72 .92 2.29 2 7.62 3.62 4.0 1 6.43 6.43 6. 19 6. 19 1 1 .21 1 .21 1 5.00 5.00 9. 11 9. 11 1 2.0 2.0 i 2.0 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 1 .2 1 .2 1 ...7 1982 - 4 32.32 8.09 1 ' 103.5 1 .71 1 39.46 1 .5 7.89 2.63 3 5.0 1 .67 2 4. 19 2.095 50.0 .99 11 1 .92 1 .92 11 1 .01 1 .01 i 26.5 3.0 1 1983 1, 1 13.43 6.35 11 60.75 1 .384 11 36.79 1 .06 1 224.67 1 .78 Upper Eno Watrrshed - Major Subdivisions 1978 'NONE APPROVED i 1979 NONE APPROVED i May 18, 1983 �� J� Page 9 �x �� Summary of Recent Subdivision Activity in Protected Watersheds - March 1978 to May 1983 Cane Creek Watershed - Minor Subdivisions # of lots total acreage lot sizes 1978 1 6.39 6.39 2 7.40 5.0 2.4 2 2,88 1 ' 16 l '72 1979 11, 15 4,02 7. 13 1 2.0 2.0 1 3.77 3.77 6.27 6.27 1 2.0 2.0 1 1 .0 1 .0 1980 1 45' 12 6.74 l 2,01 2'01 1981 2 14'97 7.42 7.55 1 1 .0 l .0 3.46 3,46 1 1 '66 1 .66 1 3.0 3.0 1982 1 6.O 8.0 1 3.O 3.0 6 14^54 3.64 1983 1 21 '66 40,00O sq. ft. 1 1-9'5 4^7 2 4'8 2.4 1 41 .05 2'01 Cane Creek Watershed - Major Subdivisions 1378 NONE APPROVED 1979 NONE APPROVED 1980 7 9.67 2,4 1 .32 1 .27 1 .24 1 .20 1 .17 1 .07 | M�y l�, l�8 � Page 70 - K Summary of Recent Subdivision Activ[t ! in Protected Watersheds - March 7g78y to May 7983 Cane Creek Watershed - Major Subdivisions � l # of �t ���s total acreage 1981 4 lot sizes 42.48 ----- ' 4.91 5.00 5.00 7.58 1982 2 14.99 7^5 1983 5 18.46 2.0 ATTACHMENT E 9K- , ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT RILLS:BOROUGH NORTH CAROLINA, 27278 ,60011 Of Fi 477 .j kv•4 114 MEMO TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: PLANNING STAFF DATE: MAY 17, 1983 SUBJECT: PRESENTATION TO PLANNING BOARD ON STORMWATER. MANAGEMENT At the April 25, 1983 meeting, the Planning Board requested further infor- mation on stormwater management objectives and techniques as part of the Board's ongoing consideration of watershed protection and economic development issues. Ed Holland and David Blaha of the Triangle J Council of Governments ' and Steve Gurley of Wake County Planning Department presented information on stormwater management ad' a means of maintaining water quality and implementation techniques, respectively, - at the Board's April 16, 1983 meeting. A summary of their presen- tations follow: , Ed Holland introduced the topic of stormwater management by identifying the 4 varied objectives for implementing these techniques, including the traditional purposes of flood control and drainage, as well as sedimentation and erosion con- trol and water quality. Holland noted that TJCOG activities in the field of stormwater management are specifically focused in the latter: The concern lies with the pollutant carrying capacity of stormwater runoff and the challenge with keeping these pollitants out of protected bodies of water. Holland conclu- ded that Orange County is progressive in North carolina in recognizing the water quality aspect of the stormwater management problem. : David Blaha explored the techniques of stormwater management identifying those techniques considered the most viable by Triangle- J- COG, those utilized elsewhere in the Country and those specifically addressing industrial development. Blaha reviewed four stormwater management measures with the Board including: • a) infiltration techniques b) detention basins c) impoundments d) density (controls,) a) Blaha indicated that Triangle J COG viewed infiltration techniques as the best approach for stormwater management,, Primaillause-both disoled and suspended Pollutants can be addressed and at relatively r1nimaliçosts,mirilmal ;00:i. if implemented through site design versus strUctural Tmecha- - nisms.i The Staff of Triangle J COG are currently attempting to relate impious.snrfaceS-. to soil infiltration Ca• acity,-and to determine maxi- . mum impervious surface ratios. , 1 , , 093Memo May 17, 1983 Page 2 Blaha emphasized that the key objectives are to preserve undisturbed land and minimize impervious surfaces. I b) Blaha noted that detention basins received much support during the 1970s, but have since been recognized as causing significant problems, particularly with stream bank erosion, maintenance, and safety and health problems. c) Impoundments are similar to detention basins, but are built to a significantly larger scale and provide longer detention periods. d) Denlpity controls generally refer to larger lot size minimums to prdyide for a smaller proportion of impervious surface on the lot. 1 Blaha described stormwater management programs in Maryland, Florida and Farifax, Vironia. The staff of Maryland passed legislation in June, 1982 requiring local jurisdictions to adopt stormwater management ordinances with the following guidelines that post-development equal to or be lower than the volume ofipre-development runoff generated in a 10-year storm, and that the preferred approaches , in order, are infiltration,flow attenuation, reten- tion and detention. Florida requires a permit for all stormwater discharges directly into a stream and requires the first inch of rain to be infiltrated on the site. Fairfax; Virginia has been a pioneer in stormwater management for water quality purposes. Though the initial preferred approach was detention basins, 1 as a result of problems associated with the basina, the County has rezoned I approximately one-half of their watersheds to five acre lots to achieve the de- sired objectives. Blaha ndted that the location of Orange County, the predominant soil types, , the presence of headwaters, the size of the watersheds and the relatively un- developed ch4racter of the County indicate that stormwater management options are open for the County. In response to a concern regarding ground water contamination[due to infiltration techniques, Blaha noted that given the resi- dential pattern of development,expected pollutants and soil types, this would „ not be a serious problem except in reference to industrial development. Blaha distributed the TICOG Watershed Management -Technica.I'Bulletin #2 . -- and summarize its comments. 1 - 1 Steve Gurley from Wake County reviewed the County's General Development Plan and described the water supply watershed plan category. Three water supply watersheds, including the Falls of the Neuse, Little River and Swift Creek,have this plan designation. The preferred land use is residential development on 40,000 square foot lots. Complimentary neighborhood type commer- cial uses witN no greater than 5000 square feet of floor area located - thoroughfares low density recreational uses and institutional uses are also permitted. I Wake County utilizes a Consolidated Open Space Development Technique which allows 30% of M piece of property to be developed intensely with open space and . - utilities in the remaining 70Z, Other stormwater management techniques being discussed are impervious surface limitations, vegetational buffers and mimimum _ = 1 EMBIMINNEMIllso■•••-- -- 094 Memo May 17, 1983 Page 3 lot sizes of two and even five acres. The Wake County Manager has recently approved a Consignment for staff to develop stormwater management standards. Gurley noted the greatest development pressures have been rezoningsand re- quests for ETA expansion. Holland concluded the presentation by stating the challenge as coming to terms with a, development consensus and, then, when the location for develop- ment is detelrmined, overlay desired protection measures. Blaha clarified that in an undevloped watershed with minimal point sources of pollution, stormwater is a Significant contributor of pollution. He added that the process was one of tradeoffs; between development needs and water quality protection concerns. /dg ! 1 Can,.:%E COUNTY 0 9 5 BOARD OF Ca'24ISSIONES ALLion Acrcia Iter.:: 113 ACEIC-N AGEIZZIA. IT.t2.4 ABSTRACT MEETING DATE 5/23/83 Subject:. SpeciallUse Permit for Phase IV of The Timbers • 1 DepaLmant: P19nning no 1 I Public HAring: _ yes x • , Attachment(s) : Information Contact: Marvin Collins • - I Phone , 732-8181, EXT. 346 • larRPOSE: Mr. Fred Caltes has requested that he be granted an extension of time from _- June 1, 1983 to July 1, 1983 to complete Phase IV of The Timbers Mobile Home Park. NEED: The Board of Commissioners approved the request by Fred Cates for a revision and addition for a PD-R8 Class A Special Use Permit on March 7, 1983, with the condition that Phase IV be completed by June 1_, 1983. It will take a month longer to complete this section than expected. • • IMPACT: It is uncleair in the Zoning Ordinance what procedure is necessary to approve a request foie an extension of time. At the discretion of the Board of Commissioners modifications to a special use permit may be granted without an additional public hearing (Section 8.7.3) . The granting of the extension should not have any significant impace on the project or the County. ;•.!: ; 1 1 , I 1 i719,(5 , 096 1 if.4, ehe , 64- ree-x-ot,:t 41- ii y\g „. .. 2_177-15r7 , ! , i i . NT-4r, zi--- e,../..,_... & 6.-„,, - q (- h4) 1 , 44 , 4 1 .. / ail . 1. ! ' 097 m^^ « | . CRlNT3ECO[NTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agenda Item 0o �3Z�� &��A ITEM ABSTRACT �m�_ MEEMG DATE MAY 23, 1983 _ . ' Subject'�- ~ REQUEST FOR SPECIAL PUBLIC HEARING ' i . ' - L'� \ ) Iu8oli� ]yes XX zno Attachment(s) : Iriforma#on Contact: MARVIN COLLINS --�-�����' LETTER FROM MR. MCADAMS Phone Number: 732-8181 ext. 346 PURPOSE: TO CON IDER A REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL PUBLIC HEARING FOR A REZONING REQUES OF WILDWOOD DEVELOPMENT. NEED: MR. JOHN MCADAMS, ENGINEER FOR THE WILDWOOD DEVELOPERS, HAS REQUESTED THAT THE COMMISSIONERS SCHEDULE A SPECIAL PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS 1983.REZONING REQUEST ON JUNE 27, MR. MCADAMS DID NOT MEET THE DEADLINE OF APRIL 15 FOR THE MAY 23 QUARTERLY UBLIC HEARING WITH THE PLANNING BOARD. THE DRUlNANCE PROVIDES THAT THE BOARD MAY SCHEDULE � PU8LlC �HEARINGS IF THE NEED EXISTS. | � • IMPACT: Approval the request will enable the developer to proceed with the su iYiuion, if the rezoning is granted. RECOMMENDATION: AS THE BOARD DECIDES. . : • irlilil )'L---ta THE JOHN R. McADAMS COMPANY, INC. 098 CONSULTING ENGINEERS 100 HAYES BUILDING,GLEN LENNOX CENTER,CHAPEL HILL P.O. BOX 2896,CHAPEL HILL NORTH CAROLINA 27514 (919)967-7079 May 11, 1983 Mr. Kenneth E. Than, Manager The County of Orange 106 East Margaret Lane Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 Pe: Request for Special Public Hearing FRE 8302 Dear Mr. Thompson: We respectfully request that the Orange County Oamnissioners conduct a Public Hearing at the Cbmmissioners meeting of June 27, to hear responses to a request to rezone approximately 130 acres of land along NC 86 at 1-85, which land is knowü as the Wildwood development. 1 1 We were unable to Prepare a re-zoning application by the April 15 deadline for the May public bearing. Since the regular public hearings are only quarterly, waiting Until the next regular public hearing would cause Wildwood to miss the 1983 building season. I _ We believe the re-zianing request will be non-controversial. The request will be to re-zone various parts of the development to R-5, R-8, Industrial, and Commercial, alll in accordance with the master plan presented for the • Ccnmissioners inforMation recently when the Rr4 re--zoning was granted in the southern part of Wildwood. I We thank you, Mr. Thompson, and the Cnmmtssioners, for the consideration of our request. Sincerely, 7HE 1JO R. McADAMS COMPANY, INC. ' -/E7/f0.64/41,4 ohn R. McAdams, P.E. President JR61:11m _ .- _ 1 , -I v . ...- , t.„, 1 1-05 .;Esuci-s OF BID OPEN!NG 437 . . Br a too- - ApPLI .,....., .• P. i',OST '::::: :kinTt:_11,515.00 : ESS: o t't -- :: FNTAGE OF BIO OVER _____ uNDEJ:..____4.65 COST ESTIMATE ONE: JOS BID LI:71 Jia5 NEOTIr!EO LTD . COPW BM AMOUNT . . 1. Gates Construction ___11,366,0a_ ,-::: 2. Morrow Construction'' ' _iz....cohna._ _ 3, Frank Griffin & Assoc*. - 4, William Kin' 5. McDuffie Construction — 22_ILL0 Bids opened by: Roxann-. W, 7ime of Bid Opening: Iglajp,_, _____ . . 1 of : ..:: „ Date o Bid Openi __. _„— ng: Ma 12 1 .. ...; ,:: itnessed by: Glenn Davis . .......,................me.....,,0„.n.e...4...,..*......+f......rt.........rPwW*tyrrtl-Yrt+, ; ' :est Acceptable Bid: 10,980.00. ___ ,,_ __ , _ _____ , . I i.. 1 agotiated Amount: ra c to r: _j____McDul_fieconstruc4gri_ ..,. Rt. 4 Box 402, Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 ADDRESS f ' 4 732-6901 PHONt NUmBr.R Hi''... , 7.04XENTS: Community Development's contribution towards the rehabilitation of this . , ,. dwelling unit will be $6,000.00. 1p, 0., ,..-. .,7: :- DATE tted by: _) Ai,,,Itt Approved by: Frozee d Order: issuee E:::j Not issued i ____I 1: j' . , , . , . z , . .. ,! gilt ri,:7, 106 ir R=suLTs OI: BID OPENING .. , .::::::::: Terica Wallace APPLICATION NuMBER 71 .. :',ORESS: Dixie Avenu —e COST ESTIMATE:_ r.,637.00 - ;=1:CENTAGE OF BID OVER 10.52 , UNDER COST ESTIMATE 1 : ,ECK ONE: JOB BID LA3 JOB NEc,OTITED 11 COMPANY BID.AMOUNT ., Gates Construction i ,.., g. Morrow Construction -. . , __11.„9,Q1.,•• ),,.' ! • HH 3. Frank Griffin & Associates -31.0 • • ________ .,,.. 1 4, William King _ELVA.•• , i 1 g, McDuffie Construction _— 3ids ()Paned by: Roxanne Warren ___„8.1E...00 ...., ...., I . 7ime of Bid Opening: Date of Bid Opening: IniaL.221911.________ witnessed by: Glenn Davis . . ..*..........4*.....v.v..**..........n.I......... st Acceptable ... _ , 7 e g 0 t i a ted Amount: _ A _ _ ____ _ . , • ' :::.' tractor: • ---"RtmE :':= Rt. 4 Box 402, Hillsborough, N,C. 27278 ADDRESS ...;.. 732-6901 t PHONE NUMBER . t., I-1- :OMMENTS: CommunityDevelopmentscontribution towards the rehabilitation of this dwelling unit will be $6,000,00 r• ...P', f:' A ca4,41, DATE: 5Jtrnitted by: 4 , „ ,...., ... f 72.i d Approved by: ____________________ Not Issued =11 Proceed Order: IssueCf ' I t BENTS: !;. r , t. t, .. • 4,'.3 a , ..., „.. . - lir/ RESULTS (‘ ' 310 OPENING I':•::•!,, -.. , ;I :.... 7.',..,NER: Nalatha ' s - APPLICATION NUMBER 82 ' 1 . ,,• :,01rEss: Daye Street COST ESTIMATE: 7 299.00 ... 11 :ERCENTAGE OF BID OVER — UNDER 4.10 COST ESTIMATE !I ".:4ECK ONE: JOB BID I X I JOB NEGOTIATED I 1 _ ,. ., . COMPANY BID AMOUNT Gates Construction . Morrbw Construction '. . Frank Griffin & Associa - .. ' vs il , .,•-. j . .. . f. William Kin' • : .111 !. McDuffie Construction • 7,340 00 h . •., 1 r 1 aids opened by: Roxanne Wa -4 r: 4 Time of Bid Opening: 3:00 ..4b. r:1 1 c , . i Date of Bid Opening: May 12, 1983 i . Witnessed by: Glenn Davis 4 1 ::-; .....4,r**.......ervorn.krt*r*.***.*****rt*, 11: ' ■ tt:'fl Lf;tlest Acceptable Bid:, 7,000.00 gotiated Amount: _ y_8_-_________ __- , _ :bntractor: Morrow Construction ,J77-H Rt. 2 Box 394, Mebane, N.C. 27302 , - . ADDRESS 563-3023 1T 1 PHONE NUMBER / 14 I : COMMENTS: . I Submitted by ,..4.. / ; DATE aid Approved by: Proceed Order: Issuer? ' Ell] not Issued 11 COMMENTS: J . , . , • . -., .. .1 . , I ''•i i ds 0 ORi B COtJ T , BOARD CF CCX-MISSTCDOIS Actio t A . a I '. y Item sa. ACRION AC '4;, ITEM ABSTRACT MEETING DATE June 6, 1983 Subject= TAX INTEREST RELEASE REQUEST 1 Department: ' 1 I 1 is H°arm: yes X no Attachment(5): I . Idfcirraa.tion. Contact: John T. Horner, Director of Revenue Letter 6 Copy of check Phone Nuzber: 732-8181 ext 432- I l„! 1 Purpose: Releasing of interest on 1975 bill # 11432 listed in the name of Hayes;W. Forrest. Mr. Forrest feels he should not have to - - pay the interest bet-Rose he did not receive a bill.- _ i _ 1 , - 1 I . . j Need: 1 . 1 Regiost of the taxpayer. . . , I . • I .. I 1.1 Amount of dollars lost;in interest ( $36.34 ) i I _ -4r1 1 /617Z) Ii/C; i F5- 100 r‘i I 1 ehl°2/0/?-5 I Sy ed6eti aft.d.4141 ) ( 1 4.---"-- I (0 -.T. ..k1ly...J-4 1.414747; d? . _ .,.. 2 ( ".7( 4-1.-"Z i , . I I I'Le,,v * 5.7k. V..eczioaD a- CalL . .---,..-. --- ,&.--v-- ..vA4., _ R, j(A.. r It, ii-i-ci_f_ cAzzcz. A.4\-q-ci-INA-ttr, 6\p42 -._ -‘/%4-k- fr Ida214 -t 0 1‘. 6_,. r`OV42-1 "AvNc bAK P-ft)Pv1/4- ict761 _ . __„ i" 1--.-- - ( - '.-t- dial _five. iet._ Orct.."se_. (7.49,421 ai 41Azte- -1-1-Ate . , I- ------- .- .., tmt—cii-va,n,1 r 4:Le... Va-ovak ..... r t , . • 6 Ince--lq:75_17._ havg--140Prt)Perfli-- -e5-- - --- ----- - f , ' _1- - it)46t cuA -45 P , , 64?*._ jev__-.-6vel, T A- a .e71. • coakAADJ V\c,,AN___66,(2... ck- e... 3*.ifIt-e-- iA . _ _... iii. kakitiosee9 Tlea6e .ZArS) a_ ' , 1 . .... 1 1 a j1)- ------ ' sl ( : LL _kope.,1<- t.),01) _ _. . Alkis ‘4. iiti bat ivM (€069-, _dorte..ippe..0. im. ./1/1/4461 76) _; 14teo .F;rce. -1-- ...t4.Da.5 01- eD1,* ,guic9.2.`dt i4t\e-___ r ,.... ______ _ _ . , ... ,. ,me._ .._ __-_---- — i-......_ 1 1 , , ..-.. ?- t . 1;.. 4 Merrill Lynch Cash Management Account 1 - - - .............0......, _, k 4., r7) HAYES W• FORREST IOLA NC 0E3129370 ,,,,.. e--- ,,i. 2 0 1 . - '..-. '... - .' • • '.. ' . • . ••-•- :•••• ' . ,•;•••::";'''.‘: '.'•''':''.:-.'''''••••:.'1::':.=', .?•::):.114.':''."1:', `• !...:-'r,,•t-,`-:.w.t.:7•-;:tkft."- - • •...- i CH § 105-379 REFUNDS AND REMEDIES § 105-380 . .;...:: .'.. Editor's Note. — Sections 105-422 and repealed by Session Laws 1.971, C. 806, s. 3. 105-423 1, referred to in subsection (c), were effective July 1,1972. :• .-.::"--. -'— Airricia 27. -...,. - - - Refunds and Remedies. § 105-378. Restriction on use of injunction and claim and delivery.— . • . ...". (a)Grounds l for Injunction.—No court may enjoin the collection of any tax,the I . .. ., ... sale of any itax lien, or the sale of any property for nonpayment of any tax imposed under the authority of this Subchapter except upon a showing that the , tax (or som part thereof) is illegal or levied for an illeg-al or unauthorized PurPose- (b) No Order in Claim and Delivery. — No court may issue any order in claim and delivery proceedings or otherwise for the taking of any personal • • .. . property levied on or attached by the tax collector under the authority of this • • Subchapter:(1901,c. 558,s.30;Rev.,s. 2855;C.a,s,7979;1971,c.806,s.1.) 1 . •..„.., Editor's Nets. — The case cited in the Camra'n v.Guilford County,274 N.C.585,164 • ..-;:c following note as decided under former provi- S-E.2d 476(1968). dens simile,-to subsection(a)of this section. When Injunction Will Lie. -- Injunction A distinction between an erroneous tax will lie when the tax or =moment is itself and an illegal or invalid tax is recognized by invalid or illegal. Redevelopment rzen v. this settle' a and North Carolina case law, Guilford County,Z74 N.C.585,164 5-R.2/1476 Redevelopment Comm% v. Guilford County, (1988). :' .. •"; ...-.''.^. 274 N.C.585,164 S.E.2d 476(1968), Quoted in Reeves Bros. v. Town of An Illegal or invalid tax results when the Rutherfordton, 282 N.C. 559. 194 S-V.,t1 129 taxing body eeeka to impose a tax without 0.973Y • •-• .. . authority.as in cases where it is asserted that Cited in Cedar Creek Enterprises, Inc. v. the rate is unconstitutienal,or that the subject State Dep't of Motor Vehicles,290 N.C.450,226 is ev-Pmpt from taxation Redevelopment S.E.2d 336(1976). i .- 4g= No taxes to be released, refunded, or corupromis ed.—(a) :. ,-;:.•:,.,,z;,4; :.. erning body of a taxing unit is prohibited from releasing,refunding,or ••-,...:.--:.,,.x.-;,r..i compromising all or any portion of the taxes levied against any property within its jurisdiction except as expressly provided in this Subchapter. •. '-J.:;,---:';..-:3E41 (b) Taxeslt.hat have been released,refunded,or compromised in violation of ..'''';:-..-'4'.,:•42•,>:,1 this section phall be deemed to be unpaid and shall be collectible by any means - -•:....7:-A;',i,2,-..,.; • ....."...,--„ , provided shad n not be affected by the unauthorized release,refund,or compro- mise of the tax liability.. -..• '-'7.:*.i?.'',..i.....-.:v. (c) Any tax that has been released,refunded,or compromised in violation of this section may be recovered from any member or members of the governing -...z:-.,-..,-.-.-4-;:••=.1,-• body who voted for the release,refund,or compromise by civil action instituted , . by any resident of the taxing unit,and when collected,the recovered tax shall be paid to the treasurer of the taxing unit. The costs of bringing the action, "• :. --..;-.41 including reasonable attorneys'fees,shall be allowed the plaintiff in the event ... .. ../.1 the tax is recovered. , .,.'.',•-.,,,,ZI:j (d) The provisions of this section are not intended to restrict or abrogate the ' ' .':.....,...,..3 powers of al board of equalization and review or any agency exercising the 1 ' ...7.-:, ' -.,,..;.7.:A powers of such a board. (1901,c.558, s. 31;Rev.,a. 2854;C.S. s. 7976; 1971, c. 806, s. 1;1.973, c. 564, s. 2.) 1 Local Modification.—Town of Stoneville: order improvidently grunted to release one _ 1976,c.336. 1 from the assessment of a legal tax upon prop- . . ..., ii Duty of Commissioners to Rescind Order erty, Lemly v. Commieeioners of Forsyth. 85 i I • ,..--`-',...; :€,T; Releasing TeX.—It is not only competent,but N.C.379(1881)(decided ender former similar I I ..!.' ;:i.: the duty of enmity conuniasioners to rescind an provisions). ..- .-,.::-.' :...!!.."3 II • -- .. 137 : ..,::: -•.1..,1=-Y- 1 .... -----,: ,.....,., --- 4,',...---.,;':,, ..;--.-.•*sr--/47:::,`-';''7".-",-'1',1.1.?-*'''''•- -' - • :..'r 'f..- .•",••-,:.:'-'•.c:- . ' - •• . .••• . *. •- -..,'..'-1.!,--4,1.• . ... .._,, 102 1 r AJ r••• ,- En 0 C7' R --,5'r 5 0% " rti 0- fl CD 0 CD n .0 -.1 0 -2"; in- rb C 1-.1 g- 0- 0 ■-■ = rt, 01- ..". 0 Eli. ,-,C) g• fa rC 0 0 t'',;•• ag, , BRz-y, --< 'c' r, n - 8 -, "'"' mr1-1 po • ,-En n ye 0n •-•" 11) rb r/ a' Pd ._... .. tk, -••• ..... 0 [73 X 0..ri, 0 , PJ C..... in ...1 ' Cn (4 0, fl Fr i..1. --- ;--,-- il z 0,,, 0 0 ta, 1:6) ra. .• 0 2 M 6-H ail 0 n re; a(-1) co a) aq Z"5" 5 iTn° P ••< 115 :::- ,-• x 5•n = 0 i i3 '1'4 8 ° r. 5".. go :1 `-' ..ri 5 7 -I ra 0 .-- 0 ..<....., (-) 2, De :1-• co FP'-s < Da r.-.' En n '1 c* 9 Fo 14) z n 0" n .-t n n, A, I-.• - ro A) ''•-‹-0 x < o o 1 p'-' (1' C .1 , 0.C)11 0 4' R .-9 01 I 1 W IT m"cat/ rp" 0 r5 rA" co 0 .--1 I-1 0- ,...,- or , o. R- a. - . x n - ...) o 0 0 (I 1-, -1 w rD ,--0 o -: ii, r. r) CD CM cr)... 0 al. A). r..,- 0 4, r, ,,, ri r," rt •-ri. . rt. 0 0 .. 1-1=.. *a•. '-• n o a: A .9:gq I t" 0 '"0 - '" (7 n g: i-lo 2:: .9 pc) pa co ° .,.• ry I/ AT n43 07 "<"-r....cfr9 Cr - Ct Ct• C - Z " C) R. Pr, n C CI' .-7=-1) IQ •-•. 0 n • Pc e, 0 -0 0 - r9 c_re r,9 ,e". ,.." E n 9 n ?•, ,c,..), .<° _ , , _ 1 V ■-•• 5. 5. 4 E. " n ' 0 0 -1 cn 0...< ' .--: pa < n C '1:5 0 `A" n .-.7 n c" w 0 • 0- L.' 0) n rp Pn 0 - -t, 0 n pj . fa) n 0 = `0 '"' 0 ---- ra V, 0... rb 0' ■-• 0 n 0 •-•• = n 0 ,-,-, 0 • 0- ..-1 - n 0-'15 r-• (-• -C:. r-t •-r D CD I'l 5 '1 00 . g! gowc- - witinzepw § x5. c, H ,..,D3 2,3 .-.1 .a-• ,__, rt, 0 ! ° '4 m n 0" 0-- "<- 0 0..`0 =' 0 o " N '-' ° P3 0 7, ED- t",;" 0 rD ri, .-. .-1 -,..," .-1 -•^CDR ‘,.dll 4 ..0 'CI ca- fg c &-,- ...,'"' .-- - 0 o = g ET x R. --s ro .... r, .... , .. 02. ra n •-•< "6' 0 --- ° " 1"0 0- x n •-• 0• 0 ,-, 0rp x 5-' < < 0 0 •-• = 0. ni cm -a n - n n P' g- 14) - X n XI '..< g. p.., f/1 p. 0.-• F4'' S .-s rig 6 4 5.aq ;Tr ci, ro .0 .4 n n 0 ,,, cr, ,.., ci, 0., 6, 0• fa. rp g w w .-...EL- a. t•D 0 .-t c P ,- - 2 -I, 0 .6., s,, g• -I aq a- rD o 0 0' 1.,1 cm 0 ,..i: g ."- 0 °- z. tf,-•• r-, cm a n ... = = o --• 0- ..,*0.0 co c-C-. 0 0- a. .1 = („ ,.., ,--: cy .-• .- .1 ,--11 0 5 r-P. `• -1 a.. -- ° ro a."11), 0 -1-, .--1- x - 4) `•11 ., 03 rip 0 A) 0-:,": " (1) zn . co 0 cr ../L.. .•+ R. o-ro v,, no 0P0 - 14) ...,w ,_," n.. 63 1-0 CD 5. co la. -i 0 •-• -• 5- n• r7r1 'e -I o""< a' ," ' "" aaq .2..: r.. ro 2 0 rD 't n 0 5 10- .... > -1../^3 r„.• .---.8rii8E3 no . 55 .--loa. -- 8 ,‹ ,,,, 0 2 - n rz"Si n go" i o a 0 R:. tun' ra 9 4) 0 w •-'," 0 5.". 0 (4 ,,r' I-1- rt r'. a......,0. - , -: se x i;:it 0 c') .-- ::: -1 < C C < 0 r' rD n --;‹ E`.), • r-).6 .-”1 r.r.-c • 0'. .-• 04 0 n 0'' 0 ,g',.., 0 0 ".< 0 0 ..... tl. eft •, 0 ::: 0-a "1 co ,-. '"zi E ,..,...< ,..... " II, rr ,_., .6e 0 0 ,,. 7.,- cv - ,-,. ia• '1 .-'• 0 X m' •-•d co 0 ,-- 1 k., " ° 7 -9 rpr" ,..„0 g f.,o = •-r, 1 1 1 --- ., _._-,.. I - 1 i ,41• ZG 1\-i . ...-.. ..I ....• 1.-.• .-t. ._1 A.) ••,< C td CD cs I'D ea a, 5 --1 - 13'; 63 -0- 1--` rto- ' 0 ;:-;::',1 a, .ria r7.1, 0 9, 0. ,-: - ■••• lu = -, r." .--", w'a x ° - - al -; i -- E-.1 5.- n '' 5-• a 5- r6- ° 0 a- - 0- r; n X Pc Ej 5-0 g -I--c o ,7- f), 0 ., = a ro ,---0- ... .., ..f • - .-.73-ct •-• 0 .-1 0. 'A d, ,..,' ,,5 ....1 n 0- rp cp 17," ,,.... _ r, cra A, (DI ;:,, ri; n 0 p) n `10 Cr .1 '1 n.. 0- A' .-1 '1 CD co tn ''' p'0•-‹ rt, o .-- `.° 0 iti;1 °.' --• FS' 5- n r,-,- o t--. --.-cs.1:5 (I) z f•hl - a 5 ., 8 -- rz n, A, ft, 0.ro- o •-•■1'0 C e0." rt, co ul (1) CAI rp 'CI ,c ,-1.1 ° -1 " Fr cp 9' ,-, rt ri, u, - .-, , a 0- - c%, =-. x -, (.1 I'D fp 2 rD-< Pi •-■ cp r' '.. "" ..1 = a. N•■•1 r., *-*1 n Or. -I ;-.7. ■-• r',. x n 0 rp -.. 0 - .1 cb „ CI..1 ul 0 ;5,, At 0' 0 IT r.,• 4..,.. ,... 0,c• .1. 0 0,1 ......-1 ...,..., , ••.< -.< .-t a. „, w ..4 0 ;5,,. ep ,;,1' El) " rD Sp " 0 c2r7 20', FD -" wog, ",,,Ip - " eD I ' m 7,•8 E..-0 .‹ cn cl 1:1:1 C2- 4- P." "' 0 i'') 't" ••1 R A•-r• CO -1 Ai . 0' C.4 X CD PA) c n 0 0 - 0 .-1 17-*-: 0 r,E.rs'cn o ...el n .7.• E, g.; sc" 91(57 A) 0.(1 'ri s. o ° .al .., Fr L---- 0 0...c.r0 n . 0,z7,• ,...,- CD - ..., CD CA s.Z. ..' co 0 fb ..... ni r6 (73, 5 n S- p .5. ct.. tv -, - a. ......-, L' rD - o 7, r- r c ,H 0 ■-• P.7 0 p CD pa P.3 ca I..: 0 n =. , 1 n ■-•(41 " -1 ro .,:i. •-, '11 cD 0 cm 0" rp'-- 0 .1'" Fag'V CD ,..." 0 g: r, p r. ...., . r, in 0 .1 n .-1-, .., -a 5„ cl •1 r-, A) ,-. - ■-•-t-,, c-, ro 0 n 14 '-' 0 " ° 0- r4 - r. 4) -ca co. M r° co c. v' 0 0 m rj va " :'•"' ,-,•, a• -. (0 0 0 c" m. 0 rb 0. 0- 0 tf4 os• = z ft (II < ii;10- " 4•9 Z" = 116 5". '-'f;:i.. Pr.. AI "IQ 1 cn 61 .1;2.;...7177 ar12. 5°.-15.1 ; . 7 112 r:•)• n 0 o -1 io- n 6- n E,i @ o o 0 1" -74 "° -, 9-, 5" n" 5 o < o ro , :,, rtrpg' Plzo 5- 2 2.. -0 04 Di FIT 5-.Z' n, 0 0- g Ixcr cm r, -- wR 4, - ..., .„ ...... . CD .. .1 0 A.I. eb rp ...< " sq 0., ....• = r. .t ' R. b." '''' ° 0 0 rb P-,' i -6' „..° 0 rT 0 r.) X' g. " F* ni ''' ,-. °II I-1" CD ...• C.1-(.„ ...0-.-1 -• 0 .0 .-• F., czt = ft, - .., ,-,, c.......' -0 ,, I A, - cb -E.' ;'.. * r" 0 ,-t) .-1, 0- 0 .-‹ r.,,, g ,,, n 0., a .-- 0 "6 000c1 -40- P--iz, i -< 0 9 .-f) -1 ..,..., 0 ••••_< re •-. .- . .a.er -' ' ' -.,.."44-1 or.i.e-;Pi i',/..tir. ir'-;- -i'-...--•...."''.'.'.:„*. •-...."...".7:-174 . .-- 4.". ..,....%.: ,• • . .,.. . • ••7. , • I.'",.. .7, 7.' ,. i- '- ': • ' ... ;,....' ..e'Zif..•; ......' .. ' ' '' ''''',".:` .1:-""'-. "' ''''''.* -''.' ' .. . . -. ...- • . . . . - ...:-.: .; '. .,,...7.: - t.,•' . .-' - . . • .. . ...- . ' ':' - '. ° . '. - '.. ' . -- ' . 'i'.; Pi',- .... .. 1'' ' .- ' • ' -., , . " , ; . . ... . ..-- '----: -..,-.,' .. -... . •-..... ' . . • . - _ . ----- 103 .-.. ...,-,.. -...3 ,-. --- ..-..c) ■-ry 4.1 ....1 -I .1 "C) "C7 .,, 0 " 5= i":"S aq :a F7) cr4 0". l'..;.,..?. co o C.) a, (73 X ,9, 'f;1 0 3 n, p 3 ,...] a - s< 0 - a g.' ;LI a = a 0„ :-.4 1 n - n AD CrD :xi cr - • v' ,. w 5- R-• .. 0 3-r■ CD cc, cn 0 rD A3 0.- t-r o, 0 ,., fo ,•-•- n , .7„. -0 " .-. R. 8 5- X .t., ,..,... .-, 313 '-: n .1 En 3/3 r..1 v3.3 ct, ,,, rD a •--i 1..., CD rb n 0. rD 0- 55 - r--.- wo 'P - 90na., , t1), P., 9pg a0r1, 0 a cy 1 Z- rD w (P 0 o w 0 ■1 n o (-9- lg .... r-1 - 5-' .,.; .1 ..-‹ 2`' a ' at- p, a < 5 1p1)4 fo Fr °, n .-- gy. 7 ^0 r■ 0 = ..1 0 ,-. n 0. <-,.. ro X D., .... a. ..-- , . -, ...., ,., -• ...„. ... „., ,.. ,..., . -, .., .--, .- a -T 0 -I ,,,.. n-7 -, .. ril rr, _ ..... , ro -icog za- ,-- a - ,-, •- 9.) ,...-,.- 0-5,D0 ,..i., v' oaro R. Lol gj '-' -: ca. ,--' '-' '''' •-7<" '... ""r1 -r o 0 -I Er w ° 0„,,,, 0- w" P. -, rD '1 EA 120 I rD n r° • ... r7. 0 41 - -. 0 `,-'-L " a " n A., 0... r, ., , ri. a- ,- P 0 ,-.. .., r) .--, . Z n P.) r-, .-..• - pe '-* 01:1 z crIV cr FI) Fi. 0- rD - 1.1„) a• 0. to r I A CD , r, n r..0 AD erci 0 0 5 0,..--.4 c, I clin "' 'r. '' r; . .-... rD C7 f'D 0. D‹ -1 a ,-... cr a) a ,-, • , n F.'D n rj; r,-1 rD rD , CI. cy. '.-CI rt. 1::,.. 0 '64, .-1 rrl .§. n cD 8 t-- 1 P x rD a Fs_ -, cr. „.., a .-. • ,..,..,-• ial, .3 11) " ° 04 -- rb [u. 0-, -, ...1 o. :.-.',• 1:53 , 0 o- 0 0 - rir ,r4, ,..„, 0 p.) 1,-.. C:i. v4 ....< , 6z. -, cm - -1 - pi 0 ......- *ra, '-ri, 7-.1 ra., 0-• 0 a (A: to 0,04 g c-D- p.d, to. , .,.,1 '-i rD ri n <° w n'n c110 cre' ,-.a I P 5 a 0 rb ,. 6 , r -, .-. 0 rb -. r.713 CI r, < .-...Pc Ca. s •-• "ddr ai P p- .. '..'. cn co - •-,1 rD a Li rD 0 °- P., •' 'a .--, ot, 0 ,-nr615' 0• R ' n0arD = F:, .".;... 'sr° ^1 roiTiRro a• a 7 :•-•:**-° < nr.' 44• X ° .-3W 58 {:3- ag4) CD . 11' rl 00 61' r- di- x a al ..,P `11 0r .-P., g cr . a. a- .-I a ,.0 "11 1'3 Z G PD. ``e:; a•-0 .-, 0- tA '- .-1 ci. En a tr ... .-1 P IT rp C .. 0 ,-+) Z °- 0 0, 0 05 rl" ° ,••• a: .. T13 0-' a- es, 0- 0. a goot-ArD 1-,-) ,-,2 0 rn c0„ et ....< ■-i 2.; a 0 (0 CD gn r0 a n' o I'D :1 0-• 0 143 Do :13 •• t...s'"‹ til st f'D .-1 .-3 rD 0 al r". (13 LA ....1 te■ 5 5 rj =' g 0 .-r ''' " g- 8 - w P941 tr :Z?'--- = P- .."3 md. .•. fa) .1 (D, .., ...., cr a CD •••• -: 2" 11.1) :I.. 5= 2 ,,,, - a• 9.. ri. ..., ,.... n r., x ,..„, a- r. cn .-0 4, 14.1 CD CA 4,3 () = PP rp '-'' < 0g47 .. -(1 = ". . p a ., „, o. o ... =- ? 0 7, c`;'' x. 41 2 5 eD' rD' .-10CDP1C4 .--3 R rt-r , c.. r_t -3 rt, , oaa ,-Dr.3 ..00 '..' .P <,.,„ '1 a ' a- eD ,T, ro a 0- ■-• n 0G ,--”'Clg0 .-- Gcb ...1 cr. Cr t'D :: 4 P 0- PI AD rD 0 AD AD = ,..n a n R rD 0". ..1 l'a .. 0 0 3e, -• 0 Zr ""' ro o „, w ap 0 .- a 09, ,-"1 0 0 o 0 ' P •-• rD M Fp- A3 P.' ii) ,., , rD ,., " ri) a 0- d z (A ^i u, 0 ,.,0 po 0..•-•C .* ›. .1 rt, ro aq 0 -r t-D 0, 0 a. 0 0 , u, - ..- . 0 ...me . Z CD '1 .1, ■••( 0- R 0 n ■••• CL 0 Z) ..1 act ''' ID n 0 = =*-< '6/ r•-• 0.. r., ;.• ••< 5-0',.....r0 ■-0 q es. -...... .-, '1 P-t '" c) •-• m"..o 0" O . ,-,,- 0 -- .1 .1 ... ., " DO ‘,, irt■-,si re ,-.. 0 pL., fa.."‹,cm rT cm a - 0.. 0- q...."_, 0 ,,,, a* r. "< w , f.. r7,- , ..... 0 - 74 - up n .-, a- • 5 r...`e-- to";. 2. „, fi.:LI a 43 rD ,cs' ,..0 ip R. ... .1)% ....,,'"'0T4 0 0 C2, 5■ X.. "4 rb r. ... --' ne•D > xla) 3.. '1' = M.Ell. Er I.," = *`.‹ co 8 n - la 0., 0 rs, .6.-., n P2_, •-- pa a_ r. R ra P- St. .,,.. Po j',"t' 0 = 5,)-z 0 n ,,rp .. (1' croi9 1C4• .,) rt. .. PI ic0L R cp 0. -- rD a .i..,-, 0 < F.D. ..-3 '-• 0 g m ri, - ..- F... a a- ..... Pd -F. c = ; n a (14 F) 0 ..:‹ .-, x (r.; .4. ""‹ p 9 „... ..,.., r.) P , ro g' ., .9 - ..-..< rb 0. r/, o- C) Z a 0 t i 1 0 0,,,-,-., 0 a .0. . a fa. .9.;, ; c r pi t.3) 8r o ,d 4.0 (90 ,o. ci., =on B.,, .<,f,,. r R.. ri ,;71 3....ci orl rt, 0 ro= p, „9- .-.< al..1' --- ..< Z ti 0- 303 P Fc fl) '-i 0., ...., 3717 A) ,..,.,`-C ...: a z Do "I onPd.* 0 Di .--,' (T) ...a. 0 5.' 0. , cr...,2 g rr, r-. 2' rD.' n rl 0 F•r P, '-' ni 0 VI a < 0" 8 . rD .,.. a.1 0‘ 61, cr , o ro ,-, e •-1, 0 a, 5 - -, ..., ra' a 2 C5' 2 cr - " a el 0-, 0 4,--• ct, .--• fD 0 :,-;„ ,.„, r-, ,...., „, - ,rb =-Sitl :-.70., ......i>• !!! .-* .........0 LI: A.," tn ,-, .1:, CD - ORANGE COUNTY �� / � ��� � ! �^� / � / ' BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agenda Item No. 4�1 ��� ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT' N���m� �N�~ MEETING DATE May 23. 1q81 Subject: Housing Rehabilitation Contract Awards 1 D epartmgnt: C0mmunity | velppme--- 1 Public Hemring;- yes X n" �__J| 1 -----^ Information Contnct--- - -- .�..-�~`..~.,~, , : Wilbert McAdoo Bid esulty ! / Phone Number: 732-8l81 Ext. 429 / Purpose: | Award of three Housing Rehabilitation Contracts. � Need; Sealed bids were received and opened nn '-^ 12, 1983. Attached is a tabulation of the bids by dwelling unit -- numbers, ~ ~ •Impact: Award of contract to the lowest bidder will be consistent with present housing rehabilitation bid procedure. 1 b Li 6 - ( 02, ?., - , 1 105 1 _ I ,--',ESULTS OF Eli) DPENING I i . . . APPLIUTICN HtlEEP ?7 . :H=F: Bryant Roberts COST ESTJE : 11 ,516.00. ::: ESS: Torain StrIppt ,_:_______ 1 COST ESTIMATE -:. -:.:1ITAGF OF BID 0 .',R .!flDt, 4.65 ' _ H--_- : ONE: JOB 1 ! Xi JcJ7, .. .;: , COMPANY; BID AnOUNT . _ O! PAN Gates Construckion _11.,366..00- . _ 2. Morrow Construction "' - . . 12...000-00_, _ , _. 3. Frank Griffin 6 Associates _ ___ 11,,5.1.0-.00----- 1 4, William King i . 5, Mauffie Construction _.1.11,920-.00--- Es opened by: Roxanne Warren ' , ime of Bid Opening : 3:00,T.m. 1 Date of Bid Opting: May 12, 1983 4itnessed by: 1 Glenn Davis 1 ...........1 . J. .D .nst Acceptable old: 10,980.00 otiated Aclount: N/A ::::ntractor: Mauffie Construction NA:Ir Rt. 4 Box 402, Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 __. ADDRESS 732-6901 PHONE NUMBER ::OMMENTS: Community Development's contribution towards the rehabilitation of this dwelling unit will be $6,000,00. Sibmitted by: 1 At jir-44 \in all,t. . ,.....4- --. DATE : , . I | / 0 L/ V - / , '/' ), - ` . 1 � ��� / �»x� � ( CiD OPENING | ' ! APPLI[AT !0N UUMOEP ' I- EP.: T—Dixie- - ------- ,ic TH�T[[O5 T . | :_-__-7,837.00 '__= 7,LE| TA6E OF mu w UNDER__________________COST OST [ST |HATE ---^- � )U� �|EGO7 (AJ D [---'_\ HECK ONE: JOB o| L � � B(0,/MOUNT ' ,l ' .Gates Construction _ ���"=~[Dl _ - -_--- _ 2, Morrow ConstruCtion __89OU�.0 _ - ' 3' Frank Griffin & Associates _ L���l��L_- ---- -- -- � _ __ _ 8,954.DO . _ �� � . ___ ` McDuffie --'-- . Sids opened byl Roxanne Warren _______ ______ -ime of Bid ni»g : 3:00_Em, __ ' Date of Bid Op/ ning: May 12, 1983 _ _ Glenn � McDuffie Construction __- _ �_--. ' -_--- �cn�rac�or� ! � . .. ___ Rt. 4 Box 402, Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 | ________ - ------ ' ADDRESS 732-6901 PHONE NUMBER ____-__- 'DSUEUT�� Commun tvDeveloom8nt�^contribution towards the rehabilitation of this ` dwelling unit will be $6,000'00 . | / � �� �/ _ � � ) ` � DATE: 5, -/e, ,, "-� - Sxtmitted by: __ '~�. ~ ^ A �� _ ���_ -- _ ~ ____ / b L/ 6 - / ° L l - � | | || ` . ���� �� « RESULTS or BID OPENING � gEA: Nalatha RusSell _ APPLICATION NUMBER 82 Deve 5t9et ��n�E��� _���_� , __ _ COST ESTIMATE: 7,299,O0 :ER[ENTAGE OF BID OVER 4.lO COST ESTIMATE ' ---- - --- --- ------- :HECK ONE: JOB Blip ------ JOG NEGOTIATED �---1 -- . COMPAMY1 BID AMOUNT - ---- Gates Construction _______ _ __�Z+��ULJI0___-_~ __- __ - . � � , Morrow ConstructiOn -� _ �,0D0 80 _____- i � , Frank Griffin & Associates _ � ^� o� ___-__ � ' William King --__ - A~�2l�'OO / . McDuffie Con�truCtion ' � , _ __�°�~____ | Sids opened by:' Roxanne Warren Time of Bid 0pe i»g : 3:00 p,m.__ � Date of Bid Ope i»g: May 12^ 1983 _ ,. ■ Witnessed by: | Glenn Davis °*****°+*+^^~~*�~°~,."~°°~�°^,--°°~^°~~*~,-. °°°°°~°_,_'~°+° °, °^°~~+°°*^°*°*°^°°°° Lest Acceptable 8 7,000.00 _ . ` ';egot{ated Amount: N/A _ :ontractor: | Morrow -- — ---- -- -- - —`-- - i ��xE Rt. 2 Box 394, Mebane, N.C. 27302 :!- ---- ' ADDRESS ----------- I . / _ 563-3023 ---- ,` i PHONE NUMBER COMMENTS: . ' -/ | ``' , / / � Submitted by: L7711 ~/ DATE: 5 -4-f3 -.,„ ': . 7 -.k. • . 1 -108 ORANGE COUNTY k I BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agenda Item No ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT f MEETING DATE May 23, 1983 . . Subject: Request for County Matching Funds for Vehicle Replacement rDepartment: 1 AaiNG 1 [ Public Hearing: yes x no --- . Attachment(s)1: Justification tatement Jerry M Passmore Resolution ()In f Financial Infoimation Contact: . Phone Number: 732-8181, Ext. 282 Support 1 UMTA Application Purpose: Commissioners need to take action on providing $6,982 of matching funds (10%) for two UMTA vehicle replacements for the Orange County Coordinated Transportation (C.A.T. ) System. (See attached Resolution of Support. ) • Need: JOCCA has submitted a UMTA, Section 16 (b) (2) application (attachment) to N.C. Department of Transportation on April 15th for seven replacement vehicles for the C.A.T. system requiring assurance of local funds. A part of the total request is two vehicles (1-35 passenger bus and 1-van with lift) that would be sched4led by the Department on Aging and used by departments such as recreation, with local funds requested from Orange Count . (Justification/need statement attached. ) Recreation Dept. Director has a verbal justification report to present along with Senior Citizens. Decision by N.C. Dept. of Transportation Board will be made the first week in June; thus a resolution committing local funds is necessary. (See attached Resolu`tion. ) Impact: If approved, matching funds would have to be budgeted for FY 83-84. Operating funds for vehicles are already budgeted by DoA and/or paid for from user fees. Vehicles would be titled to JOCCA as lead agency for acquiring UMTA vehicles for nr ,-- Countvlana 1...-A 1...__, . . _ . . 109 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINANCIAL SUPPORT OF THE ORANGE COUNTY UMTA SECTION 16 (b) (2) APPLICATION FOR VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 7 BE IT RESOLVED by the Commissioners of Orange County that the Commissioners authorize financial support of $6,982 for the Orange County UMTA Section 16 (b) (2) Application for vehicle replacement if and when approved by the North Carolina Department of Transportation. This the 23rd day of May, 1983. 110 NAME OF APPLICANT FROM PAGE 1 : Joint Orarpe Chatham Communit Act on Inc. Certification of Special Efforts To Provide Transportation That Handicapped Persons Can Use . Joint Orange Chatham Community Actinn . Inc. , (the "Recipient") (Name of Applicant) hereby certifies that special efforts are being made in its service area to provide transportation that handicapped persons , includingOeelchair users and semiambulatory persons , can use. For recipients of funds under sections 3 and 5 of the Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964, as amended (UMT Act ) , these special efforts (lj are consistent with the guidance in Appendix A to 49 CFR Part 27, Subpart D and (2) are already made or will be made withiri six months of the effective date of 49 CFR 27.77. For recipients of funds under section 18 of the UMT Act, the transportation resulting from these special efforts is reason- able in comparison to the transportation provided to the general public and meets a significant fraction of the actual transpor- tation needs of such persons within a reasonable time. Joint Orange Chatham Community Action, Inc . DATE Legal Name of Applicant By: Signature of Authorized Official CONSOLIDATM REPRINT AC RO: 150/5300-4B i ' .... - - This consolidated reprint incorporates DATE:• June 24, 1975 Changes 1 through 5 IL .. • ..' 4t t ; . Alk... . . ..:. . I .1.-,...„........v*, .... eo-k41-447,5I-,.„IN. .. C I 7" T', CU ''g. .... .? .. rd UTILITY AIRPORTS •-, ! , A :.,. . 1' '.:.' AIR ACCESS TO NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION -... , --r. ... ..z.„----- --:_,. ...) .."".`5-- ..,...,..,:„.,. 1 J11.••:4-s.,-,72-P-:f7.1if,L..4- .----,... '"'-‘,„ .__. ., - ----------_,... ';%, , t' ' - - --,7:2-1-1-::-.-•:=12?-*Azt=1,1 ,,,,,... •..4.."'.7,------- •,..4.n.,..t.,...i.'"60. "ts...Z. ...""'.....,•,,z--""--:*--"7"....e.....4 4.....,n6'.. j 7 *1111W e' (46.1Naila , ,L414%e14. ■ dilre,,4 .'_ gar,,- ,„.. _., --.- ;... -----,-----,..-. -( '11 -A14 -Z '-.44:_ :-Pip.____.'.---- -- ---_,-----. ---- -------''',;-z 40A61 . .›,,,,... f •-.., •--..-,.., 'l _—____. ,-....44,,,....,. ,...,,-...0.;~-44,:t.A,-, „,„,r• -411%k".. ...- ---.-- - - ‘•••••'"\-- A--b- - - ........ ...4., ,,,,A, • 1. , . ... J17*-4c:1/4: Sjaet‘1 I I , . .-. N ,N. . A.'Cri.4CA fr . II t4. 1 L• O.- DEPART61thi OF TRANSPORTATICN i> FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION , Initiated by: A.As_560 / ... .. .. .. _ , ....-.., - . - ..... --..4;ta ,,,,eitor,•. -,;14.Ntrzvi,p.:;-v.,1,,,,,,I,.4?r■-'4":"."./le''''-'-`,.,:".4f, . -,--,. . I '''' * '-.' --,.. "P • ^. 46'1'4 "?.. '...44101§N, -glierill.......j.:- ..,,.-• ,A..A....Zftio...,. 1,;•.---3 •.- - 4. :-.'... - ' -- - , ' . .• ',. 6/24/75 AC 150/5300-4B , .,1 ..,_ Appendix 3 • .. , . !1' :,s." •i"I . ,.., APPENDIX 3. WEATHER DATA SOURCE AND ANALYSIS 4 , r -.. , L. / PROCEDURE. When an airport is needed in a particular locale, one of ..:= . the first steps the airport designer must take is to analyze recorded ;',.(... / . , . wind Oils; .tions for the location. IXisting National Oceanic and :--, Atmospiheric Administration. NOAA publications should be researched to 1, determine if a satisfactory wind data summary has been published. Assisance can be obtained from any NOAA Weather Bureau Office or from ft k....the NOAA State Climatologist. oftho,, ----rb.ravaiale, the 10-year ____----------- ..- summariy (Climatography o the United States, Series No. 82, Summary of A! . , RaUiTTObse - " .. - is the most useful iz airport planning sign :?..4 i q si e !it gives the best indication 7Eir expected wind conditioa—it—a i .1 • g. -Ire-tris-i-t-e5-- e most comp TEE—TETZITraftUfi—regarding the availability of ;:iiiid—ffEta, can be obtained by contacting the National Weather Records 1 r Center, Environmental Data Service, Federal Building, Asheville, North Carolina 28801. 1ft ; lz A , a. Where wind data for a specific location are not available, the data II/ -: - ;;.. , ,;... from two or more of the nearest recording stations should be ex- writhed. It must be kept in mind that terrain (lakes, river basins, !!' and hills) surrounding a site can considerably influence the wind diFection and speed. The advice of a meteorological consultant should be sought in selecting these surrounding stations. ...; = b Ifl a 10-year summary cannot be obtained, then some lesser period .; tions should be considered as the minimum upon which runway of; record can be used; hawever, 3 years of record of hourly observa- orientation is based. This recommendation is made as a result of a ; study of wind records across the country, which showed that a significant difference can exist between the wind coverages obtained frOm a 10-year summary and from a 3-year summary. I : 'f• ! i ' f :11 11 'ff I ! C. Where no recorded data are available either for the specific i Incation or from recording stations near enough to be significant, an evaluation should be made of the best local information. If IoCal information does not firmly establish a wind pattern, it is desirable to collect wind data at the site. Data collected for a period of even 1 year can be useful in conjunction with local II information in the determination of runway orientation. However, HI 1 great care must be taken not to allow such Limited data to over- 1 . ride other influencing factors. Where only 1 year of wind data : 1 is' available and local judgment is the basis on which orientation is determined, only one runway should be constructed until at Least 3 years of observational data can be obtained. I . I d Figure 1 is an example of an NOAA Environmental Data Service tabula- 1 tion of wind direction versus wind speed. When the summary to be 1 i' used in the wind analysis has been obtained, transfer the appro- priate data expressed in percentage to the wind rose diagram. ' Figure 2 is an explanation of the format and its related codes. , Par 1 Page 1 . :—...,••,..,-. , ... 6/24/75 AC 150/5300-4B 1 i . _ CHAPTER 3. WIND ANALYSIS AND RUNWAY ORIENTATION I I ;. GENERAL., T , • f .• a. The configuration of the airport is determined by the number and orientation of the runways. One of the primary factors influencing runway orientation is wind. _Ideally the runwa should be aligned --N with the prevailing winds. Wind con 1 Ions affect all airplanes, I thelsmallest to the largest, in varying degrees. Generally,. the 1 . , - V smaller_the_airplane, the more affected by_74nd, paiticularly A' ToaswindcomiTaintirCrosswinds are often a contrbiElf4- fil ' criall airplane some construction of two runways May-be necessary to give the desired wind coverage. - , It" , 1 1,1 ,or b. Ai:port planners and designers should, therefore, make an accurate . 1.. 1 analysis of wind to determine the orientation and number of runways. , - ( The 'proper application of the results of this analysis will add .t., substantially to the .saf62ty, and tlae.f.ulness of the airport, Appendix - 3r yides information n wind data for the purposeof lai pint, plan- I i# a design, and the following paragraphs give ['raced res in its ap lication. to runway orientation cOncepts. .'L (9. CROSSWINDS. ,11 ---.— t [-70 F .e, x a. A Crosswind component of wind direction and velocity is the resultant i vector which acts ate right angle to the runway. It is equal to the 1 at, ,a speed multiplied by the trigonometric sine of the angle between the wind direction and the runway direction. Normally, these wind 1—""'A vector triangles are solved graphically. An example is shown in -,• 4'. 1 Figure 3-1. From this diagram, one can also ascertain the headwind and tailwind component of combinations of wind velocities and direc- .1 tons. : . I b. Study and analysis of different combinations of velocities and L. diirections, having an 11.4-mile-per-hour (mph) (9.9 knots) cross- 4? wind component, have found that different combinations produce - . similar adverse effects on the control handling characteristics of 1 •k; , . airplanes. Considering this and the method of reporting wind data, the 12-mph or 10.5-knot speed was selected as a reasonable and - • convenient figure upon which to base runway orientation, 1T. ORIENTATION AND COVERAGE. The most desirable runway orientation based 1 on wind is the one which has the largest wind coverage and minimum -A I crosswind components. t . . . 4 , Chap 3 Par 8 Page 7 ,..,,.„., . -- -. ,717 ::, '0,645.:::;$?. .:4ii.;:r. ,-1 - 1 ,0/5300-49 6/24/75 *1 .,..-.o 1 , a Wind coverage is that percent of time for which operations are con- - sidered Safe due to acceptable crosswind components. The desirable ..,' .. wind coverage for an airport is 95 percent,based on the total hours of weather observations. At some locations, the daily time period 7, for weather observations is less than 24 hours; i.e. , 16 hours. In any event, the data collected must be applied with an under- standingiof the objective; i.e. , to attain 95-pereent usability./At • :.., many airPorts, airplane operations are almost nil after-dark. • Accordingly, it may be desirable to analyze the wind data on less .... - ..... than a 24-hour observation period. Also, at resort airports, where • 1 ',. operations are predominantly seasonal, regard should be given to , -. the wind data for the predominant-use period. . ' 0 . , b. Where a single runway cannot be oriented to provide 95-percent ) ., . 1 coverage,, one or more additional runways will be required to raise , f , the coverage to that value. . N 1 c The acceptable coverage value of 95 percent was selected after con- • ..• sideratio'n of various factors influencing operations to and from _ airports and the economics of providing the coverage. In any air- ., port operiation, there are periods when factors other than wind determine j when a runway may be used. Low ceilings, reduced visibility, periods of runway maintenance, etc. , may preclude use It of a particular runway even though existing wind conditions are favorable. :.' . 1. Appendix 3, Weather Data SoUroe'-and Analysis, states in det41 how a standar1i wind rose is compiled and used. ' . 1 • ii" 1 . Ti I , ‘ . , i ; Chap 3 Page 8 Par 10 ,z, _„, ..._____ --.. ..............,-, -.',." .'*:'W.4.‘,-.., ...Z.....t".4..,•■■ •.,41...,,,..1.1,-.71 ,,,;: -...N•:4!":4-7.-.:7-1=4!..- -7.--Acelr-glv'z'4,;. *"Z-:-.1 " — - *". I: , 6/24/75 AC 150/5300-4B 4 1 1 i I I .... —......—_-[.._ — i 1 -5 0 i ill 0 ''. i I ,cse. ,eN"s7. rm. pr ,- AP — i i 1 1 I i -40 —mr...., i HEADW IND, 1 COMPONENT - 1 -KN. , 0 Ac ( A E.N5 toR0 liaERW/Allir I 7 it 0 ■ , :. ,,,,,,„il , - ! Ilitia..1111rh,43 '.2:d_.1 , ,., f arErw 1 _ rAPOPOrr- 1111211 11°7 .101111 i I c eillpf L. tiv.d.... ! 1 -1° iiirliflPIT'Arraii&git -..100iddilleillill MOM E; 1 Ertommirianum_ Wit I _.....ariamw, 1 C714 0 fl °P"Ilikiall I 90o CROSSWIND UM 30 1 50 COMPONENT ' ....'":, i i g li it‘attlihi705111i1M 1°alMMI7H :''''' f 4 i INISAIWIFIF zioo Aill , ',. , i -44 le i 1 0 Ilitklidlik F*42-. 1 r Ir= V EXAMPLE: ., [ l'‘'°° Wind speed 20 SpIrir ., _66,... knots. Angie between Illaillit III ,. ° tP t <2 o runway and direction - 30 of wind-60°. Crosswind component - 17 knots. ' • TA ILW IND COMPONENT 111 1111::CC°. — Headwind component - ,, 10 knots. e i ciS' -KNOTS in 1 ..,f, 00 -40 / rc;,.. .• - ■-• 00 ,... ....1 ca oo 54t1"12 , co o v 1 " 1111111111111 50 111 .IIII 1 1 . FIGURE 3-1. WIND VECTOR DIAGRAM Chap 3 Page 9 (and 10) I it Cliinatological Data ���"� °F`°M\c- o: Local ,, „. Annual Summary With Comparative Data a' 1981 es q.:4-' GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA STArEs °4 , I 1 Narrative Climatological Summary The Greensboro-High Flint-Winston-Salem Regional Airport is located in the west-central part of Guilford County, the Northern Piedmont section of North Carolina. The location is near the headwaters of the Hawand Deep Rivera, both branches of the Cape Fear River system. A few miles west is a ridge beyond which lies the Yadkin River Basin, while on the north across a similar ridge the waters of the Dan River flow northeastward into the Roanoke. West, .bey_ond the Yadkin River Basin, the land grechid1t ' rises fiito the Brushy Moucitains; to the northwest, other outcroppings southeast of the Blue Ridge rise into peaks occasionally exceeding 2,500 feet. The Blue Ridge:proper forms a northeast-southwest barrier with heights occasionally exceeding 3,000 feet., Winter temperatures and rainfall are both modified by the mountain barrier, but to a lesser extent than those portions of the southwestern Piedmont that lie in the shelter of the highest portion of the Appalachian Range. Shallow cold air masses moving across the Plains States tend to be stopped or turned aside by the mountains, while deeper masses are lifted in crossing so as to lose some of their moisture and have their temperature raised a few degrees. For this reason the lowest temperatures recorded in Guilford and Forsyth Counties usually occur when clear, cold air drift southward, east of the Appalachian Range. Freezing temperatures occur on more than half the winter days, but zero weather is almost unknown. Northwesterly winds s ldom bring heavy or prolonged winter rain or snow. Flurries of light snow may fall when cod air blows across the mountains, but the heavier winter precipitation comes on winds blowing from northeast through east and south to southwest. When moist winds blowing from an easterly or southerly direction meet cold air moving out of the north or north- west in the vicinity of North Carolina, snow, sleet, or glaze may occur. Glazing is more common here than in most of North Carolina, occurring an average of about four times per win- ter, but only occasionally becomes severe enough to do much damage in the northern Piedmont area. Seasonal snowfall has a wide range, but the average winter brings two snows of an inch or more. There have been a few,winters with only a trace of snow, but occasionally snow has been meas- ured from 15 to 20 1h fies in one storm.- Snow seldom stays on the-ground more than a few-clays- i Sumner precipitation is largely from thundershowers, mostly local in character. The frequency of these showers and the amount of rain received varies greatly from year to year and from place to place. Sizeable areas are sometimes without significant rain in late spring or early summer for two or mor4 weeks, while other areas in the vicinity may be well watered. Summer temperatures vary wit the cloudiness and shower activity, but are mild with maxima usually in the upper eighties orlllow nineties. Damaging storms are infrequent in the Northern Piedmont area. The highest winds to occur have been associated with thunderstorms, and were of brief duration. Hail is reported within Guil- ford and Forsyth Counties each year. One destructive tornado, that of April 2, 1936, has struck the city of Greensboro. Hurricanes have produced heavy rainfall here, but no winds of destructive force. The average growing season in Guilford and Forsyth Counties is approximately 200 days, usually extending from the middle of April to the first of November. 1 I 1 1 /noaa ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION ( INFORMATION FORMATION SERVICE AND/ ASHEVIL LE.�ICATIC CENTER i i, I1 STATION LOCATION 1:4EETi580110, NORM CAROLINA GREENSBORO - IIRV PO1hT -WLNSION-SAl.t71 AP .. T Elevation obey L. • „— So. Ground ale 45105 level r I 7 is 00700 o Location g a 9 L.U!ode Longitude s E _ ° ° I ! A o' ncoarke a 2 o - ;l % N g : E North east 'e c u - ' ° ° 1 0 c H 6 ° 3 0 a�° Q a °; : � � I iP C u`n -3 r� m K w { COOPFEIATEVF: 427 Arlington Street 4/15/94 11/30/4 N/. 36" 04' 79' 49' 143 49 5 NA NA NA so I II NA Greensboro. N. C. AI SPORT AdOlnlettration Building 5/1/28 7/23/74 9 mi. 6,124 36' 05" 79. 57' 891 56 6 5 link 3 IiA 3 c4 NA o - Effective 3/10/59.. Greensboro-PLO,Point- 4097 620 522 et. h - Effective 4/19/60. 1 I./Smitten-Salem/regional c - Talrpayrhrmrctr(6') 571/20- ' Airport 6/27/67, Nygro. can. 1305' NE of thermometer sit,' 6/3;/63. d - Effective 6/27/43. �c - installed 3/10/61. National Weather Service 7/25/74 Present 0.75 ml. I7 16° 05' 79' 57' 897 f20 5 5 /22 3 4 1 f4 010 f ^ Not moved 7/73/74. Building,, Regional AP 622 g - Moved co new site 7/75/74-. SUESCRIPTI01l: Price and ordering information available through/ National Climatic Center. Federal 0utlding, Asheville, N, C. 28501, ATTR: PubLicnc(onn 1 certify that this La on official publication of the//attune Oceanic and Atmospheric Admtntacr•tfon, and is comp}led from records on file at the Narlonal Climatic Caner, Asheville,North Carolina 2880E (�J ,-l7e ryorp/_ e Director, tecia1 CC11&net r Center UZCO141°1.1OM-11SHLVIIIE -1550 U.S.UEPAR111ENT OF COMMERCE POSTAOE AND Fff5PAID r ,, NATIONAL CLIMATIC CENIEA ANEOUALOPK1nTUNITYEMe40YER li OEPARTMENTOPCOMMENCE FEDERAL BUILDING 210 u—� J t ASIIFVIUE.NC 25801 FIRST CLASS \` *agenglagakaaletS5 . 7' I . 1 ( UXI(' X ji in-3 .r.T. . . fli -7)-4 6 d LwItary„,iv /3,,,,,tate,.. ,A, Ob-t,e, R Sax, 2,o-5 , R-T-- 5 J !! -; ,0 FX-Ind RA-6d Ce14.4 A(.,(,-epro-(2,-yvar_1,Z 1 , - ) f ) 0 ATO 4 I El I ' UPli-L- CEMAfrit / .a/C6'144 y ef.,(4, A *2-mo:fi? /eta 6-e-e, oem--e ' ahr,/4/AAAAhl-g 0-/ ifzelAgi-4 Cuu4;:-/t0;v1 CLA÷t ,cAree..41-)4 ../ Y1-- r 0676-zot., --r/eu-4 ,4414- tfru" /1=4./6-ew-d avi, t-fo+leeru'447 e-6-1-";66'4DIA-zr 7 1 . r 1 tt 0 1/2.4zr'I cqwf-) of ) . ,....., _. .' 73e-La ' , • of- , '• ; - 16/tAlci 0-AM 01"1/141 C1'4111 . '-1-6"/()-1/LAJ144 (AA"- ti1A" CfrCA'tA7(4(;.1) 1 zi,le jt,(.4 j9 &( VAP eCrt,i1-,t% 3/ -TAL g', ' AAARA#A '&-- at- rinu 0-1-4_ /1-14.4cAic- friL , . 1 T ' 14 i -rh, .„t r64 - 40 11 te4' /(4"1111 "9( , f le Fol • i, 411 /Levi-6-1-401 .AAte. , otwap-c1,019 cfrV' s . .. ; /194-4-(ablot /1,44-47tibto-1(014 ofttv 4-0,(d-' "..M49--C ti-e-71AAA:4-edAi-aci-V 1414A"6/ jj,-75e,,,,,,,,Lpy -N-GUipeA4 amfr„ii. , .4A/4;d ,,' s'{jrc- it °Idyl- Ill'fl; .4),,,,Auv ctAitfrait / f n,.. A' c 7 i tiA, if s"1- ev-vt44,01,ezwa."71;244 °7A- 1 , .-Y-41-W .)/ ' T-Ak levieftru s. l ita- ./6-'24-t ria,& t/`'l a"Mr CserGtA4-461 1,6--(_ ctIA ctA,40--le /tArel-vt0 ..:844-4.1,-a-..d A-a14.0 ekA., cy-'017d 6.-'LAJ A4241)2dta. CL4/1 C4-444."St '''' a"-IA*1 0-41i-est,0-ta terwLmitva-ksettaolagt,:f-PAANtfrwt ait-e- --AAfelx-ervkla"5-'''"6 ::, r-eci 'QA ckilt otAyaArig,8--7vccco 1:- 5..'i ea-a4V4L, ,,,,,,Air cd aro am-fri>vtect4 ',:. 1- ?5-.4.-eus-4A,s. 1,--1! _PAA-c-o-(Aityted '01VIevo/,or i eArA4d;v4 . . 1 OA, I ' e(5-‹-tA4 . Aiott,vty 0,,4„kb c,, ,,,w2-4.th- aid-fr-Y)% abt)IL -,,ale Geo .A4, '; • - ■ UAA---t--A, etn4i6 cvvy ...• , owtfriti -,(Aiit/ei L,i: -44 Aw-tAtrao .4 di i‘ lAcAli4 o2-od .4).t) 111A-cY Rod amx,-c-t,c2;60/ ,1 • , d , - . 9 --..-------- .....1•■•■Yr 1 _--___-___ . , . , i - /-07d cktie-ov L'A Ad---t; #6_,„., .4 yi,140.4idi, . 1 evieAA (y) 6.4‘400a Ak-c-o-vt.4144 ci/vcd f ■O`tekt)'7 ,Z-i-:{71,(21/e44 (./1; 't/(Aa cb,i,-(A4A, • TAW ti.40-16_,G,Aze_ Vig/Ci vo, -, ' -4V1 0-4Aort,et.w.,,, f),,Opkiii ,,A)-6\Zr .-autto-ta;vud , 41714CL.)-6-rt-i, , 414.A.z) i 6,2,wit( 'i 6,,,,A at.e..,„, cyco-L ( 1i9-0-() .,--yureuteri4 L.,;,1 6-1-14Li., 7-0---w-vt.4.-et_44 L.7.4 .r; (-1/-H.;Z-w- * L N t&Arl, (14.45-‘-','. tiA2 ../et2-14 --a"4,4 _/1A-L-Oe,t_ .1)--cA.:S*, 7 , Th) e-e- -,-e7t-6,<AaAls 0&,,,fderp/vvis4,vt pAz14-6-„oc7e._ yi-o-L-044e--,ugH (-A---<-7.,• /Lci-c- -01 40A-oul, ctioi,ii- a i ' i 0_,L12 ..A.T.-A.A.4.46CELVis2et,645Z , -1-5/2-, 07,:_ty tetAat2-„A., . , A.A.A.Ad ri,co-te,, c,"Acif t,--*,,,,e,A-- v ' . , . . , ,,,„,.,,,,vt I fj) 14,11i.ee,.wt,L4/1101 i (Ae...cy Azt-toizo 0.,1/1, --4-AArld24.41VaVtg /(A)-15r-1.4,1 ) Cl'IAP't et,-mitpL&I".--v, 40 . , , 'I 4' -, ,s2,,rk,kkiA . '-bfio Auda-fevvviae ) toculr,tik,X , , 'tAa.A.V0,',/, , r , • P 1 c I IQA, ' f I 'AZ14'r • VV, -Z. ,11.24.0-31,AA/V, 02,t,t4 tt(C14 tit':67:1 i -4-4A-24.2.A.d. , ,oLvd Q[1,0V144 trvi. it-PA-4 r.„..„ otc,,,,,,scir„:„...,,,,,,, & /4„4_,,,,,/ .4„,a-t, ,v,.,,—..,,,r,d,t„,, ,. /. i , ; • c,.,,,„,,,o_r.dAii- d-4,0, c./2,-,,tef--, , Li cuiA .4_,K,,,,,d.0,4, 1„, t r('-(i)p..)1-4-aa-kd. GuitkertiCA - 4..-AWAI /,,; 'twr., /6', R-Rm, ci-d---v÷-4--6,+-kA-f-Pd PnA4f)-462 )6E, (LCA-VAIlli /tAf."1/1/04 4 tetP ilL2/fril'i )1'1-- 71A4 4 ''' f ' d el , , ,, rAeor 4.,2,---irvtd /LLD ,14/19,,tL,I,t,c,t,s_ p_v-wvai- itAi- L ' . 4e_*14-0,S, s t6A0-4.x_ 70-0C-34A-4tA4-11 (ilfe/` ("1-- t7: .6" t4A4A1 1 '/67-ert °L° , , rAefilice LAA , „eni, (i.J..)1_ A.Q•`0-f4,C-4174 q _,<A)-(-4 r A.A Auo , JktA--trA:6 , --cev. iv-ezeo-c-cyj scie/ , s . .1 00, .:APIA-citiz4 ok.) cf.frout ,t,N (,;,, tiA0 CrArAekii-7-62-1/1 Li',1 dry) t * 0' itil^ -0-1,_ • - . Yi-AAxtirt - A--, TA 4.4,Pit (A` f-byo-t 0-)W2400/AA-tail./14-cerA 0--vtit ,0-(AVet v .7-.. 4'6 (-- I c,„t (4./t,e,- 0---1-60 ---p,t-e- - Ayr/J.62,d ,..c,0---rAd 0) (A4,tp,0-- L,1:17 AD _)9_417r?a, oea-vropoturaz - a .fin ...,(Arv.vjd ...evvOLAA-r ' ,,-vv‘AA-t-et.13 , —FAL .0.2/i-X..„5);t eaLeloA 006Wvio' livo . . ' 5"0 0 0 cit 66-017-0,--ey, -0-ers,AAA,(-i-;4 sli.62_ ,1/2i,o-ad,, ci-Y . . )2"Ad -t-tt_e A/v i f Avid /write-1Z tAaY ti.,0,/t.e .,;, (,,e, /1 zkt,t/ted. ct I 0 c I 0 g - C. 3 't : / N e. , o- . ,. , , F 4„.e+ /wt-,6 ARZ-tyvYlAWAA.cbce hi tet‘) 0/24C(A-tt .5.) 11E1 _ ', A' IS vr244,1 .1°0-kitty =ik,n,v1 44 - g-f7tAXIAd fli , ne16-4.4A4,4-0 } 6,41 ,44,24 ec(A-6--&4A' a U.1-A--b-1:11 FAA ckut.ii0-1 c),9d,a71,(;)t- oe(tio, C'e)-eArPoot).) er-A i a- 100 p-tote ili-l'AcUt)16 _A-cr(s-cAP )4.cw-e. tk 0A)-t-t 3, yooled 41-t-74;-1)/tP __o_.14601f-61,40 Sri.,+/`,'"" _ I 4;11 ci 1.d,,. 02 0.,, a J ti: I`ru / , ' 4 01A;Ai V -31900 pt.tv,trm..elki ,dect,t 4,0-vLe ( , A VA-ed , ,C Y/vp F74 A c(oW--t41.( CAA-c- ja 1 o-74 v - - ' ' 041-°--,Z 4to, /5-0/5-300-, 1 / 1 1 ' - . Lt Ir'2 .,(Acutect (51-4ANvi A, cf i tc0c) 4#/tittpo Fvrk ay& 4/-6-Ar-ierwi D ( to 9.,of C . Doo cam- t . , ,, l# 1 o J , r 1 teW i ; x.,u;.4,1404A*(litY-1)_-_11 t4a s 6Q--d;"' ' 1/L-A-'1-;'i il' ' Z e ictAde 04- .,e-c,o)v,--c1-1---tr'a-e&7 cli .3 y 0 0 Pe e,exut. , lAa ../6- 4-ed c----k: GI_ 3 '' / eofte) 4-14P / ad A52481'14/24A"'" 1/1;1 q114 , 1 ' 0 li ' r,0_.,e,t7 -,:i, 4./e„,,,,e, A,A,ea4.6-2A-cd4t. ,6 WLe,. VAQ. AJw/111,4), ) 01,t6(,,)01%z(-4 + y,cdo op- , i _ v s ,,, Z,---6,61a. F A A a, i I�?,crt.6(Af?rti, tia loi l ,7-'� fJ cer", rbei .,t_Q, 1.2,0 0 0 Jet-4-1,0-144 640 -__ IA,2( a raw? )144-A-AAAT ) 41 e'e51/11L - -",PAA A4-6-(A)--sA-r I(X ---#174%,,rti ,ARrAAA5244.-f frt. , . A7 4.Q., C-C j) 1 C/V /2, f A " pit, AVA46,7.2.4 • 1r ,f,..„0-(3-t,,J2d /diP1 -eCt42-6--LA.ett , I,A1-2 11-e...?---b1/1/1,444-24/4 MACY OPOK,V) 6_,.(A.AlLa--2,c' .4,1_2-LAY/07 5720 air(Le2A-r,cald AE2,_ -,Ae, ,,,, ..,,,,,, ,A.,,,,, ,e,,,d.,,,,r Ad ,--,- -ti,40, °odic()) ..„.„,_ A.8,„,,,,, la .2v /6. Atea.A.0 11)--y a, Aeyr4A.A.A.p.' viApA IA0 -,, cit oqf " 0 ' "got , , I , , .,/tee AVAR-U24/0-124/tVV-ii? e...4a,i. ).6-7Afie) A. kei ciVu.s re,,L, z000r, c, Voa ras/1/ 4--1A 0-01P-41k c4"7'.6; # 114"erljt;ZA'")244)t ,:' aciu-k.a. ce,,,,,c,41 At-ad. u,-,,,,,Ate.,117--Am'i 106 c4.,v-tfriczvliV->a,eec)- :,: Tize4.. rto-a_d , ai.,,,,,,,,,,,,. ,v1t Ki.c,14reid1vo . 1 -KA -13H AL,0 f21-1. /62-0&-zAttP 6--4-11'11 C04-cri-l . b e „ ) 4/thi44-ArtAl "Y",0 ' r --av, rAeti-xiti-0 _a_I--(4,I .."1-1=-1,C, -Ckuve,{,u ' 0-cw 1.,(40-17 0.--1,,ce ce-Lf2 (I r. /4112 CI,te-4,) AZ-0— , t 4 ' ' "VVIle2Ark C tiii,,e,:4- pg- ..,(Air otezvtAsV , 1 t, - r v° -(7(to 41-,----s.,-r - 4_ • av„..,,,Gist ttso, - ., rim i f, to ia..e c, ,r, cezvd do c' ' a i I ..,A,Aro-Gc,ed i-a-ct 14, t 7S-42,c4,_.-44)-(Wk,eetrilm, FA.4_9_ aitAl-Utt ' 01, 40A;4. -IA 4, 6 /}Met/ivcHfAxicd,EQ4E oz-1,4 --c-v---0-Q-ed 6-e-- eA1-2., _ 4Autrue, • • I 4-10-atterA)01-40 (-A)LP CA.A4,144 AllaCt ofr I , a , .4 l ' otfL, 2, ILA.) /1.44,44~,11-14,t' r :b '--T)ee .. , of lerL ,,, 4,04._q) .-4.irri,;.4 tto 4_111.e.-64.0P.A-c-ice P-v7-4-vt-i/V 1 , , 7 ,e_e„,, fzip,,, ‘ f.,,; (Aii,r, -axeidie ttkr ALI,v1-2,0,4_,,,, , 14J2,ta„ ;. If • it-v-fd 1 ' ' - -1/1A. -A/frtert.ti-Ge6 ,ice,61,0_14/3 -6;. 11,21(4. CL, PIA.A4.1.4)-” ,..:(,,,(:/--,. 4 , -lerce,,,,y ei-Lcrm ,,,,,0„,1 ce. , 1 ■{..tt-ti4 —"e4K-dt•td-i - r* fiLe rAd-/,7, ,-,,,, --(A)-•IA -A-AAA-4 Cp. 0111104,0-d-thei ,A..0-0e-11(AA-eitQCe-4. rr - ' , teA, acgrtAipitA i .5,0 / ---( ..j cut.te Ar Al-A-A-A-40-AA-A-e-0 ike ( „.. /144,tpkAl-trit. 1 OlaMtP t,Lccil „A-Z.,a,t i2.47vvvvt-,t,em. 4V f 47'( a"4'. tO -OA) et . , — i.-- ' ort 04,tijw-cv,ri (!_miutt,Y. ceu-e-erex-Areci. 1 ot, ,c4r0A.A,64p1, . ° */1 1 41q2-12-eY/ W _ .__,2 ,A-QtAr74171/YLQ,Vd piAAA9A ittot tt-6.2.ar I. , ., 01-tt7 el) ' __-(.17-4,0 _.4.A.H.4:.ei- - 7iyan.t041)1 1-0- /4.c . (V - „, (J.,- 1,7,0,0 wifint 04- tf40 ia,,,ciri‘, ido-. , ./w -eutii, _, _. ,A4c\- t . „ f2,1,.. j 0-Akk- 'PAP 0-0-c-'-'14- , frk001.1. at, ictaxi&beS I 1 1 County Commissioners County CourthOuse Hillsborough, N,C March 28, 1983 Dear County Commissioners, ! I am writing to express my concern over the developments maneuvered by Mr Hazard in his pursuit of his Midway Airport. I was shocked to learn that this Public Hearing was scheduled in ofder to allowiMr Hazard to pursue major changes in the special use permit he was granted, changes which should by all reasonable standards be resubmitted in the form of a new special use permit. Although I am dismayed by the Buck Mountain group maneuvers, I am especially concerned by their request to remove the flight training operations limit. I urge you not to back off this restriction. If you do it will cause serious damage and financial loss to this community. If there! are no limits to such flights, anyone can buzz this neighborhood with their aircraft, this results in new hazards, safety problems; and a major nuisance factor. Land values for rural residential living will be eroded, because they are based on the desire for quiet country living, I have been trying to sell some residential farm land here during the past year, and have lost several sates when the buyers learned how near the proposed airport would be. Unrestricted training flights would destroy the quiet factor, an important reason many of us settled here. It would decrease our land values for residential living where we could not hope to salvage our investments, I am requesting that you maintain the training flight restrictions, and not take on the responsibility for bringing such financial losses to Bingham Township. _ Sincerely yours, Eric Schop r Rt 1 Box 182B Old Morrow Mill Road Chapel Hill, N.C, 27514 ORANGE GROVE VOLUNTEER EIRE CO, ROUTE 3,HIE ISBOROUGH.NORTH CAROL INA 27278 To: Orange County Board of Commissioners From; Edward Johnson, President Re: Comments on Midway Airport Proposal • Date: May 11, 1983 On March 24 we received a letter from Mr. Rick Cannity of the County Planning Department requesting OGVFC to clarify its request for an access road to the proposed airport via Teer Road. At about the same time Peloquin Associates communicated a similar request by telephone. Sinec there was no time to call alspecial meeting of the Board of Directors before the March 28th hearing, I, as president, wrote the attached comments dated March 28, 1983. Because of the postponement of the hearing, the Directors were able to consider tie matter at a regular Board meeting held on May 10 at which time the attached letter was endorsed unanimously and without change. I would like to note that we presume that all conditions laid out in our letter of June 24, 1982 still apply. Additionally, since we have not been advised of any changes in the plans for the airpor9 ubsequent to June, 1982, we would like to reserve the right to comment separately on any alterations that have occurred that would be relevent to our providing fire protection. E23255Pszsgmwoug122="'"'"----- ORANGE GROVE VOLUNTEER FIRE CO. ROUTE 3,II IL LSBOROUGH,NORTH CAROLINA 27278 : . ! - I To; Orange County Board of Commissioners From Edward Johnson, President Re: Request for modifications to Midway Airport permit submitted by Buck Mountain Development Company Date: March 28, 1983 The Orange Grove Volunteer Fire Company has received a request from the Orange County Planning Department to comment on its recommendation that Buck Mountain Development Company provide access to Midway Airport- - ---- -- via Teer Road. We have also received a simil4r request from Peloquin Associates.BOth of these requests have come too late to call a special meeting of the Board of Directors to reconsider the issue. This letter, thereforejattempts to expand on and clarify the reasoning behind our original suggestions laid out in a letter to the Orange County Board of Commissioners dated June 24, 1982. In that letter we stated that access to Midway via Teer road would materially cut our response time and that it would else provide us access to a densely wooded area where takeoff and landing Crashes may occur. 1 The inclosed map No. 1 shows that the distance from our firehouse to the Midway property line via N. C. 54 is 4.3 miles.Via Teer Road and the suggested access road the distance is 2.7 miles. The access road would be approximately four tenths of a mile long and could connect to the service road that would run along the Eastern boundry of the airport tract. Alternatively, a much shorter access route might be possible by connecting do the road through the Meadowcreast development. This route is indicated on the inclosed map No. 2(taken from Buck Mountain's proposal dated May )7, 1982) and would be approximately one tenth mile • long. The map indicates that some sort of road already exists. 1 . 1 The relative lengths of the N. C. 54 and Teer Road routes raises another issUe. Our Fire Company serves an insurance-rated district (known as Cane Creek with District) that lies wholly within our tax district. All points within four road miles of our fire station enjoy lower fire insurance costs in return for certain restrictions placed 1 on our operating procedures. Specifically, we must guarentee an adequate amount of fire protection to the Cane Creek district even . 1. when answering calls on the outer edges of our tax district. In answering such calls, for example, we might dispatch one truck and call upon neighboring fire departments to supply additional equipment. This policy is laid out by the North Carolina Insurance Services Office. Our distriA is growing and the time may not be far off when there will be a significant liklihood of having to respond to two fires at once. We are now 'answering calls at a rate that is three our four times that of our initial year(1974). ISO restrictions will cause us to place a higher priority on servicing fire calls within the four mile district. . i i 1 4.. g - page 2 - z: - r r Midway Airport is dramatically caught up in this problem: with access via Teer Road all parts of the airport are within four miles; with access via N. C. 54 no parts of the tract are within four miles. At this time,1 therefore, we cannot guarentee response to Midway via N. C. 54 with more than one truck. Mutual aid would have to come from either Carrboro(eight miles away) or Station 10(about seven miles away) . With access via Teer Road there would be no question about aur ability to send all Of our equipment to a fire at Midway. ! I In vi of these considerations I see no reason to modify our earlier recommendation that access to Midway be provided via Teer Road. . <5:L-1 c"...j? Edward S. Johnson, President + • ....,..,,,,, , 1 , 1 fi • FIRE' ff: 1 : '; ; •. Alicir Na. 1- sritrhom ie fwee,,,) fie SYertichi ,'•'i.,', ,. ... .' -,.. .., _ ...I , .. .,. cl r e /Vir AAA)ez y in . RI' v-pal-t- .. 0., i .c.:...... i,t4:1! •;., : • ,,, VIA TEE!? ROAD : 201-t , .. • .i: , , , . . .. . ., .. 4 . c _ ,. ......, ,,. „. .;.:.-- ..„ ... ..,„, r eksR fe6A1) .t 15.1 .37 ORAM$E 9,ypoRD A OROVE !kr) :;.4 ROAD -, b • '',4 1 :' Z '..T. WA ' ,. ti 1-i,.: VIA M.C. .,..,:j. ,. :„-i- 51( •. if.3 , .. ., . .40 07. .A ■ 1 I 11 .' I le 40" Af/4,ES" i .. -1.-... ; --- - - -- • - — .` i-1 - 1 1 `t: :-.. C '....: .. • ..,,, . 1 - 1 .. . 1 ... 1 . ... .., .. 1 .. ;.,.. ......_ _ . r, . ...../ , , 1/411=i - 01 , 1 0 North ( I . ---- N.:,1 ct. ,- .. 1 .. , ..... , I , ; .0:4 311ft• .90 • E) 1 1 a t (.1 • ea, # .. ..-, . :.*=.1,_ • E ..,... ::„..... 1 ..„.,-4w,„..44_,_,,,,,v, pg ---b 4,4401,--..t4v.444t , . _........... ! ig.gaiiiit---ti ' 1 /es-1, 1 0 .. 1 i„ 11111411111 W ilm Ems .1„,- a 2 c.t R st. . I i < • 011114 i . Ei . . . . ., ' P ....• od.v` r-1 le: tr1*- ' 0 .r"---4-**--"---- Et- 1 . . ›... ... . , .... . 1 0 - DO , • • CI , 05T f V tat 11/4 8 ,,,t 141 . I 0 .-- a .-- u masa ai 0.. kunoo a3uotuDiv o ix 1 C' I . 1 • - 1 i I .. uningsguassmi - xi Recommendations, Considerations on the Proposed Midway Airport Clear Zones The purpose of this presentation is to raise several points • that belieVm the Commissioners should consider in ruling on the request � for change of the proposed Midway Airport clear zone from 5000 feet down to 1000 feet. �. | � { The attached diagram illustrates a 20: 1 clear zone slope which the FAA considers reasonable for safe airport operation per DOT (FAA) AdVisory Circular 150/5300-4B dated June 24, 1975. • Based on Ville 20: 1 clear zone slope and the 1000 foot clear zone requested by the developer, any object, such as a tree at the end of the runway clear zone must be no higher than 50 feet, if h is to be maintained. , a clear �pproac s ma ' | � Based on a | review of tree heights for typical trees in the area, (Ref: Knowing your Trees" published by the American Forestry AssOciation in 1974) , an attained height of 110 ' is a | � reasonable estimate for trees in this area. • Tree Heights for commonly found trees in this area: Loblolly Pine 120' Pitch Pine 90 - 100' Long Leaf Pine 100 - 120' Eastern Red Cedar 120' � Lombardy Poplar 100' Hickory 120 - 140' Beech 120' Southern Red Oak 100' White Oak 150' � | � ! Actual conditions presently existing at the North end of the proposed run ay site consists of a wall of trees (as shown on attached phOtographs> on the land of the adjacent property owner as indicated by the top photograph. | � | � The next photograph shows a pine tree with a man standing at the base of the tree. With the use of a ruler and using the ( six foot tall man as a reference, I estimated the tree to be | � about 65 f | ' tall , (an intrusion of 15' into the clear zone • . � air space) . 1 . ' To summarize the proposed 1000 foot clear zone is bounded by a young forest, with trees already present with heights of an estimated 65| feet. The problem will only get worse. If the commissioners finds it appropriate to reduce the clear zone buffer from the present 5000 feet, I ask that it be reduced to no less than 2200 feet, to make allowance for tree heights on uncontrolled cent land of up to 110 feet , to ensure safety of flight operations. | � / �e _� 0o» , ���� w« �� v�� _ 161%-e Dan Eddleman 05/23/83 Resident: Bingham Township, Member Bingham Township Advisory Council _--' / � ki ~ March 28, 1983 To: Orange, County Commissioners and Planning Board Members From: Citizens for Airport Planning Re: Conditions on New Orange County Airports We are, deeply interested in the issues before the Commissioners in the matter of conditions for the operation of the proposed Midway Airport, because the three conditions in question, if applied generally, might al- together preclude the creation of a new airport anywhere within the County. As we have indicated in testimony delivered at previous meetings, we have long sought circumstances that would favor the establishment of an alternative to the Horace Williams Airport. Although we do not seek CO support specific locations, we note the overwhelming need for a facility in the southern part of the County, close to Chapel Hill . The University's AHEC program and other activities require that an airport not be too distant from town. The University has stated unequivocally that they will not close down', the Horace Williams Airport in favor of a site many miles away, If thei conditions now imposed upon the Midway Airport were to be extended to any new airport in the County, they would effectively prevent its development. We believe that the Commissioners have been misled by their Plan- ning Staff's recommendation that the airport control 5000 feet beyond each end of the rVnway. NO SUCH REQUIREMENT EXISTS FOR ANY AIRPORT WITHIN THE ENTIRE STATE, including the RDU airport, the Charlotte airport, and many others. Mr. DirUce E. Matthews of the North Carolina Department of Trans- portation, in his testimony before the Commissioners, pointed out that he knew of no comparable airport ANYWHERE IN THE NATION where such conditions were set. To require them of an Orange County facility is an anomaly with the potential to bar any new airport from the County. We believe that this anomaly has its roots in a basic technical misunderstanding. An FAA circular describes approach and departure clear- ances for a utility airport which amount to 5000 feet, but this is not in practice an FAA reqUirement, Instead, according to Mr. Matthews, the FAA is primarily concerned "that no naturally occurring obstruction penetrate the specified approach surface." This FAA intent is the reason North Carolina actually has controlled approaches of as few as 400 feet for pub- lic afrpnrt5, Or as few as ten feet for private airports, located in relatively flat areas, Mr, Matthews indicated that he views 1000 feet as ° , -2- a reasonable and safe distance for the clear zone for an airport such as the one currently under consideration. The prpVisi0D of a rapid-access road for fire vehicles through private property not owned by the airport developers, while desirable in Very general terms, is another requirement that would be very likely to prevent the establishment of an airport anywhere in the County. If the Commissioners feel that such a road is of overriding importance, they should be pr Oared to institute condemnation proceedings (in favor of Mid- way or any o ther private airport in the County) in order to achieve this end. Otherwise, the objective is likely to be satisfied only by luck. It is reasonable to regulate flight training activities at an air- port. It is unreasonable, however, to set the level of such activity as a percentage of total activities. For instance, one of the first group of customers of apy nearby airport is likely to be the complex of users now operating out |-f Horace Williams Airport, and, depending upon the order in which these activities transferred, training flights might well exceed 50% in the early stages, even though only a handful of flights per day were involved. It would be more suitable to institute controls based upon numbers rather than percentages, and a reasonable basis for such numbers would be the activity levels now in effect at Horace Williams Airport. We believe that it is only a matter of time until an accident occurs in the vicinity of the Horace Williams Airport with consequences far greater than those of the recent four crashes. The dangers from such accidents in areas with very low population densities are far less than from 8ccfdeOt5, iM the fully built-up areas that surround Horace Williams Airport. We aSk the Commissioners to consider carefully the consequences Of such an event as they weigh the proposals before them. �.' kk� �� Julianne M. Andresen Mary Q. Penta John N. Drake I Rt. 1, Box 177-C Chapel Hill, NC 27514 May 24th, 1983 Ms . Sharon Allison Orange County Commissioners ' Office 106 East Mdrgaret Lane Hillsborough, NC 27278 Dear Ms . Alli.son. Please find enclosed a transcript of my remarks at the Orange County public hearing in Hillsborough last evening. Please see that these remark3 are attached to the minutes of the public hearing on Midway Airport and made a part of that record. Thank lyou very much. Sincerely, Bland Simpson enc. REMARKS OF BLAND SIMPSON NEARING JOINT PLANNING BOARD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC ^ . ON MIDWAYIAIRPORT SPECIAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION REQUESTS HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA MAY 23d, 1983 My name is Bland Simpson. My wife and I live on Morrow Mill Road in Bingham Township. We are here tonight asking that OrangeCounty maintain the conditions placed on the special I • use permit granted the developers of the proposed Midway Airport last fall, and that Orange County maintain strict limits on the 1 • airport's levlel of commercial activity. For two and a half years, the burden of proof in , the matter of this airport has been on the people of Bingham, who are virtually; to a man, woman and child opposed to it. Yet it I " fell to us , and we relied as best we could on the Land Use Plan I . and the new Zoning Law to show why there should not be a major commercial development, a major airport, in the heart of the dairyland. I 1 1 The permit was granted, admittedly to our dismay. But, when you made a host of detailed, well-.drafted, intelligent conditions part and parcel of that permit, you commissioners in your collective wisdom did those of us in Bingham a great service: you sought tip control the size and impact of Midway, to make it a i manageable neighbor for us. We accepted the judgment of the Board, and the Bucki Mountain Developers accepted their permit. 1 Now, then, they have prayed over those conditions I . and decided Iafter some months which ones they can live with and which ones they cannot; and they are here tonight chipping away and wearingdown. They are seeking to do away with four conditions and to establish their own agenda on what commercial activity is to 1 be at Midwa '. ..1.,. �ry I Any one of these four matters constitutes a major change in the permit, and certainly all, four together must require reapplication and review. We ask that the planning board, the s. Board of Commissioners , and the county attorney consider again whether or not this collection of requests in fact constitutes an attempt on the part of the developers to short circuit the procedures prescribed under our Zoning Law. I On the points at hand: First, on the developers ' request that they be freed up from the condition that they control the 5,000-foot approach and Ideparture fans at either end of the runway, we ask that you deny their request and maintain the condition. We bey- lieve that you made this part of the permit in order to keep another Horace Williams Airport situation from developing, and because our Zoning Law requires FAA standards . We ask that you examine the runway-obstacle free-and approach zone plans to de- termine whether or not Midway's current plan is in accord with State and County law. We believe the Buck Mountain Developers have made a weak attempt to obtain the air flyover easements. We are not a community, las the developers have pictured it, of junkyards, convenience stores , bars and unflappable "moo-cows". Not surprisingly, after treating us to several years of a condescending, cavalier attitude, almost no one in the community was willing to live them these easements. As best we can tell, they have spent only their attorney's time and postage. If they intend to inflict this community, and especially those whose properties lie in the flight lines in and out of this airport, with the constant harassment of -2.. !! noise and pollution, let them pay for the privilege. Even if ..-and we believe the effort they have made so far were bona fide ,�. it is not--in the absence of county zoning to control development in these overflight lanes , you must adhere to the condition making it incumbent upon the developers to control. Please let it stand. Second, my wife and T join the Bingham populace in supporting Ed Johnson, one of our widely respected leaders, in maintaining that it should be incumbent upon the developers to provide the Orange Grove Fire Department with an access road to the airport from Teer Road. Please let this condition stand. Third, I speak very much against the idea of your lifting the ceiling on maximum allowqble training flights at the airport. Unrestricted use of the Midway facility in this fashion will essentially make it possible for the developers to pitch it to the world at large as a flight training school for central North Carolina. If that were to be the case, we should look to higher noise] and traffic count figures for what we as a community can expect. IThe range of annual operations per based aircraft in North Carolina is understood to be 130 to 1737, and an average would be clolper to 750 than the 500 figure that has been used. 750 operations times 276 (Midway's proposed) based aircraft yields 207,000 operations a year or 567 operations a day. Each operation is said to yield two and a hai f highway trips, so the total would be 1417 vehicle trips a day generated by Midway's based aircraft. . . . ve: , K I NC 54 is already running, according to DOT, five to six thousand „.. ,g vehicle trips a day at Orange Grove Road, and would be heilvily 1 taxed by this'1 additional 23-28% rise in traffic. The extra traffic generated by Unlimited training flights and extensive commercial uses planned by the developers would drive these figures even .. higher. 1 :: 1 . The skies over our homes would be filled with ,. amateurs and !novice pilots , weekends would become unbearable, '...•,. and the increased safety hazards, in the air and on the roads, would ciearif be disruptive of agricultural life and would substantially devalue our rural residential properties. 1 _ The Buck Mountain Developers feel, and I agree, .. that the number of flight training operations would be difficult .. I to verify and enforce. I recommend that some system for doing just that beldevised and required at Midway Airport. Otherwise I . the burden of proof and accountability will fall again to the citizenry of Bingham Township. The Midway Airport must be made, I and kept, accountable. Please let the condition limiting training 1 , , flights stand as it is. Fourth, we understand that the developers have created, in 4 communication to the county from the developers ' architects dilted April 14th, 198$, their own list of commercial operations planned for Midway. A variety of activities on the 1 list do not i'elate to the operation of a small, private airport; these are : .n exhibit area, ticket sales for sports and cultural events, real estate and branch banking areas, car rental office. We ask that you ask these questions : how many banks , car rental i . businesses, real estate offices? how big are they to be? how real 1 . many employee are theft to be at each business? There are also: hospitality rioom, stranded holdover area, information-welcome office, courtesy offices, concession area, lounge, pilot ready room. Again, how big are these spaces? Where are the plans, the elevations? Is the holdover area a cot, or the beginnings of a motel? This its a large facility indeed, and this doesn't count a list of places to train pilots and. mechannics, now, to sell airplanes and radios, to repair and store aircraft and materiel (I suppose in addition to the T--hangars) and so forth. I believe that this list of activities and uses is a declaration of intent on the part of the developers to place a major, major commercial operation on the minimum area in an agricultural.-residential zone of Orange County where its incompatibility is abundantly clear. The developers are asking to be relieved of two major conditions--the overflight easements and the Tear Road access-- that would cost them outright, and not to be constrained by a third, the flight training ceiling, and, fourth, to feel free to create in their headquarters an airport terminal of substantial size, an amalgam of commercial enterprises one associates with airports like Raleigh-Durham. They are seeking to realize the maximum commercial potential of their facility at Midway. And it is commerce that will bring these developers back time and again as they seek to build by modification and increment the commercial complex they originally desired and were denied.. For the moment, we pray you bid these developers to content themselves with the airport permit they won last fall, to work within its parameters. Their investment we know, for we .5m , [ [4, 1 .'g,. '7 have heard aplenty, is not insubstantial. But they are I capitalists, lentrepreneurs, risk-takers by trade, and they are [[:[[ I here with this airport for profit. Our investment dwarfs that of the developers : the lands, timber, homes, farms and dairies we hold as a community run into millions upon millions of dollars, .[[ and we are here because of home and family and love of the land. 1 . . .. 1 We can not place any faith in the statements end promises of this or any other developer. They are free to sell 1 [ out, disappear, who knows what? Our faith must be in the law and in the institutions and governing bodies it has created. The I burden of proOf in this whole airport enterprise in now upon the ,. developers. )lease let it remain there. You have the authority [,[[ of the law, and the collective wisdom to discern what is happening here; and thet faith of an entire township is in you, trusting . . ., that you will let these conditions stand as they are. .. Thank you. * -6- .... May 26 , 1983 Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners Margaret Lane Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 , Enclosed please the text of my comments presented at the Public Hearing, May 23, 1983 regarding modification of the Special Use Pe; mit for Midway Airport. Please include this text in the minutes of the hearing. Thank you. Sincerely, (-2,-- 61- Patricia Cra rd ....--- ,at Members of the Board of County Commissioners and Planning Board. My name name is Pat Crawford. I am a resident of Orange County, Bingham Township. I wish to address the issue of the approach zone control. While 1 I agree with the staff's assessment that 5,000 feet should be under control of the applicant, there is ample evidence in the record to 1 support an amount necessary to control the height of natural growing fQ objects at reast 150 feet. More importantly, regardless of what number is eventually chosen, it is necessary that the zone be controlled, either by the applicant or the County. Without such control, there is no protectio1 n for the applicant or others concerning adjacent land uses . In implemehting this ordinance the County recognized the fact that airports would have impacts beyond site boundaries. The County adopted the special use permit process to evaluate proposals having wide ranging effects and thus a special use permit is required of any proposed airport within the County 's zoning jurisdiction. Rather 1 than creating an airport district and control surrounding area thru 1 zoning or develop a publicly owned facility and control surrounding area by the use of eminent domain, the County chose to place the burden of minimizing conflicting adjacent land uses on the applicant. 1 Thus, as a requirement separate and apart from any FAA, State or other federal regulation, the Orange County zoning ordinance requires "that land sufficient to provide approach zones and over- run areas is owned or controlled by the applicant. " To date, Orange County has not amended its ordinance to eliminate this requirement of any developer of a proposed airport within the County's zoning jurisdiction nor has the County shown any interest in W A ! A - ,-, ,,- exercising any other power it may have in this area. The importance of control of the approach cannot be underestimated. A paragraph from the Recommended Guidelines and Procedures for Airport ..i:. and Land Use, P1anning & ZoningAillustrates this point- "The apgroaches, as extensions of the runway, are the most critical portion of the imaginary surface. , As such, they require careful consideration of the - land uses beneath them to offer the aircraft and .. community maximum protection and safety . Most off- .. airport accidents near the airport happen in these areas. 1 (President's Airport Commission, 1952, pp 49-51. ) " This project before you tonight is not a question of merely moving an airport, the size of Horace Williams , to the proposed site in Bingham Township. If fully developed as proposed, this project 1 has the real po ential of being at least 5 times larger than Horace Williams, Airport in number of based aircraft. (Comparing 50 at Horace Williams to 276 at the proposed Midway site. ) The County has a duty to reduce as much as possible the conflicts inherent when a project of this magnitude and nature is proposed and a duty to protect the safety of its citizens . Indeed a stated goal of Orange County is zoning ordinance, the protection of the safety and welfare of he citizens . I . To reduce the approach zone area as requested would render the • ordinance useless, make the special use permit a farce and result in 1 . the County's renunciation of its obligation to its citizens. Such 1 a reduction would have the potential of creating those problems in I Bingham Township that are so troubling to the residents boardering Horace Williams Airport - there would be no control of the surrounding area - nothing to prevent growth on the airport's fringes or the height I . -2- . ZZ .t.- 4 •,:- •:, ',:!' a• C,,_ ;•• of objects. If Bingham grows in population as fast as has been predicted, it is foreseeable that in 3, 5, 10 years the County will i . !)+ be faced with the same problems now facing Chapel Hill. We should learn from the problems and errors of others , not repeat them. I . I want to Share with you a warning I recently read. It is from the instructions portion for a kite I recently purchased. It reads : • ,.. I USE GAYLP SUPER TWINE i FOR SAFER FLYING: II ,. ...A. _.,..., ..., . , Fly kites in an open area,avoid flying over spectators.moving 2 traffic,or electric power lines. -" I Do not fly within 5 miles(8.05 Km) I,insen Cross Of an airport or over 400 feet Slick , (721 92 M)high 1 I Parental guidance recommended K whorl flown by children tinclPi B k I, 001S old To avoid possible string burns use appropriate gloves,a No.1300 Gayta Safety Winder or similar device 2 nivich Twine i '1143 ' I Repair tears with plastic mending F-l ' i LIDO - ■ . AU Gitylio Kilos MI)litaile i.ifi, c•14%.1, ralurk ol high quality non-conductive ,,,?,,k4t, 1 bal 02 DINg5 p.,,,1 plastic materials R:r1981 GAYLA INDUSTRIES HOUSTON, TEXAS 77018 0 1 11- 11 1 1 1 R64390 made anci ofwded m 0 S A 70022001 P1130101 . . 1, I do not offer this as an attempt to elicit sympathy for children flying kites near the airport, but to reinforce the fact that adjacent land uses , those uses beyond the lines on a map of the proposed airport site, are present and must be accounted for in the county-wide picture. Perhaps the question is not how much can the approach zone be shortened, but rather, is the present requirement long enough? -3- ,t-- - 4 t When all of the applicant's requests tonight are considered as the , a whcie, one is reminded of e project proposed last spring and fall - a project which the County first saw fit to reject and later --- I, I approved with certain conditions after the proposal was amended. This roject has not changed or improved in such a way so as to warrant a change in the Board's past decision. Therefore, 1 resprectfully recommend that the County deny the applicant's requests . Thank you. -4- _ '� � t� existing Actual conditions presently at the North end of the proposed runway site consists of a wall of trees (as shown on attached photographs) on the land of the adjacent property owner as indicated by the top photograp6. The next photograph shows a pine tree with a man standing at the base of the tree. With the use of a ruler and using the estimated the tree to be six foot tall man as a reference, I e about 65 feet tall , (an intrusion of 15' into the clear zone air space) . To summarize, the propose d 1000 foot clear zone is bounded by a young forest, with trees already present with heights of an estimated 65 feet. The problem will only get worse. to reduce the clear finds it appropriate If the commissioners n to . --_-- t 5000 feet,zone buffer from the present l ask that it be reduced to no less than 2200 feet, to make allowance for tree heights on uncontrolled adjacent land of up to 110 feet, to ensure safety of flight operations. ' 104eLege(Lv.e.,__ Dan Eddleman 05/23/83 Resident: Bingham Township, Member Bingham Township Advisory Council ` - . Recommendations, Considerations on the Proposed Midway Airport Clear Zones The purpose of this presentation is to raise several points that I believe the Commissioners should consider in ruling on the request for change of the proposed Midway Airport clear zone from 5000 feet down to 1000 feet. The attached diagram illustrate= a 20: 1 clear zone slope which the FAA considers reasonable for safe airport operation per DOT (FAA) Advisory Circular 150/5300-4B dated June 24, 1975. Based on the 20: 1 clear zone slope and the 1000 foot clear zone requested by the developer , any object, such as a tree at the end of the runway clear zone must be no higher than 50 feet , if a clear approach is to be maintained. Based on a review of tree heights for typical trees in the area, (Ref; "Knowing your Trees" published by the American Forestry Assbciation in 1974) , an attained height of 110' is a reasonable estimate for trees in this area. Tree Heights for commonly found trees in this area: Loblolly Pine 120' Pitch Pine BO - 100' Long Leaf Pine 100 - 130' Eastern Red Cedar 120 ' Lombardy Poplar 100 ' Hickory 120 - 140' Beech 120' Southern Red Oak 100 ' White Oak 150' b".Y :L has been ��� to him but that landfill is he wants to Bell. r new � � This answer !s not unusual for a l dolvrger who wants to negotiate ed t P e price for e 0 arty. The Town of Chapel d i S Bi11 repOrtediq has a tdstory of site reluctant bas a prices con- .. e ppgiyph o0-*darr paying higher than values eati- . . yTAFF"p�pOF�S A: routine condemnation tt94Tlfi� 6 mated by real estate officials. . a Duke Power ri -al-way e' i hearing R xtrk oiorn:�:chapel At the Hillsborough'retied dfll plans fox a gY'd➢° �°u • tip regne!'8 app If h!knew At appraiser,Michael Clapn� warm Rear the weld or tans to use the tract fee a calculated the land Vane at MVP.of =4 pat p' laWIW per acre the land!�appraiser Charle86mlth eats > T t st6e ¢k. Other q in the 10 of Durbam� an appraiser testifying tout'168-sere tad bed ldion a. gravel the, real estate .�; y said it WO for Duke power, pat the land value bed on a Rra �outtuera railroad °� gmamoR knov+ledQV � the t� at some#55{1iWt1.C1epp8adGreeae 'road off Property Road:d Grreene -ndJbr county aro new maintained that-the 8.7 acre right- Vitimi ty. owner Harold I Duke Greene tX►purchase the t maintained would damage the propert- pf right- Bower's fer bad turned a6 Greene, admitted that some $ 6,000, That i8 the figure wider'' o#fre strip p�oenort Bas they claim Duke should pay for the pride a.7 sore strip �• right-of-way, Smith placed the terrier of'the' land, . This arced damage near#0►500. Duke to present its. case before a. , I Greene could have two motives coinmissioasrs' tna~url� in il3tIls- • for trying to establish a high value bp his property. First, a high y � ,� ` payment from Duke would help him osA In negotiations with local govern- meat. Second he might get pal twice for the damaged area -once . t1ri ® ' `'"�' CChapel Hill if the town beletveR Duke and then again from 4po a the area used for the right-of-way z 6 p© f is still a viable part of potential subdivision that be made im- possible by the landfill. Greene's appraiser,however.te- I . stifled that he thought the right-of- way and land along it would be j 2 b 0 severely damaged by right-of- f .,, y o e� way and hardly useable for any r� I �_ (y w 2S-® 9 suIn theory at least' any purchase • local government should be re- Y,•.^- duced by the amount paid by Duke to Greene for the right-of-way, County and town officials landau declined to talc about sanitary testimony at the hearings described t deep bore holes that were made at f yr Sv0 the site tq test soil characteristics. ��,,. ; , 6 °� � ..�0�-^°S.2- Both the entrance from Home- Sad Road and a northern Pt from Purefoy Drive Purefoy `. Road) pass by trailer parks. The Purefoy Drive entrance is also the I I location of a small black commu- I aity. i — | Mmrch 28, 1983 To: Orange County Commissioners and Planning Board Members From: Citizens for Airport Planning Re: Condf ions on New Orange County Airports We are deeply interested in the issues before the Commissioners in the matter 0f|conditions for the operation of the proposed Midway Airport, because the t'ree conditions in question, if applied generally, might al- together preclude the creation of a new airport anywhere within the County. As wehaYe indicated in testimony delivered at previous meetings, we have long 'sought circumstances that would favor the establishment of an alternative the Horace Williams Airport. Although we do not seek to support specific locations, we note the overwhelming need for a facility in the southe n part of the County, close to Chapel Hill . The University's AHEC program and other activities require that an airport not be too distant from town. The University has stated unequivocally that they will not close d0w' the Horace Williams Airport in favor of a site many miles away. If the conditions now imposed upon the Midway Airport were to be extended to any new airport in the County, they would effectively prevent its development. We believe that the Commissioners have been misled by their Plan- ning Staff's recommendation that the airport control 5000 feet beyond each end of the ru way. NO SUCH REQUIREMENT EXISTS FOR ANY AIRPORT WITHIN THE ENTIRE STATE, including the RDU airport, the Charlotte airport, and many others. Mr. Bruce E. Matthews of the North Carolina Department of Trans- portation, in his testimony before the Commissioners, pointed out that he knew of no cohpmrabl$ airport ANYWHERE IN THE NATION where such conditions were set. To require them of an Orange County facility is an anomaly with the potentialIto bar any new airport from the County. We believe that this anomaly has its roots in a basic technical misunderstanding. An FAA circular describes approach and departure clear- ances for a utility airport which amount to 5000 feet, but this is not in practice an FAA requirement. Instead, according to Mr. Matthews, the FAA is primarily concerned "that no naturally occurring obstruction penetrate the specified apprVach surface." This FAA intent is the reason North Carolina actually has controlled approaches of as few as 400 feet for pub- lic airports, or as few as ten feet for private airports, located in relatively fl ' t areas. Mr. Matthews indicated that he views 1000 feet as _ - - .:‘ tt ,‘ -2- 4 a reasonable and safe distance for the clear zone for an airport such as the one currently under consideration. 1 The *vision of a rapid-access road for fire vehicles through private property not owned by the airport developers, while desirable in ., very general terms, is another requirement that would be very likely to prevent the establishment of an airport anywhere in the County. If the Commissionerslfeel that such a road is of overriding importance, they should be prepared to institute condemnation proceedings (in favor of Mid- way or any other private airport in the County) in order to achieve this end. Otherwise, the objective is likely to be satisfied only by luck. It is reasonable to regulate flight training activities at an air- port. It is unreasonable, however, to set the level of such activity as a percentage of total activities. For instance, one of the first group of customers of any nearby airport is likely to be the complex of users now operating out of Horace Williams Airport, and, depending upon the order in which these activities transferred, training flights might well exceed 50% in the early tages, even though only a handful of flights per day were involved. It mould be more suitable to institute controls based upon numbers rather! than percentages, and a reasonable basis for such numbers would be the activity levels now in effect at Horace Williams Airport. 1 We beljeve that it is only a matter of time until an accident occurs in the vicinity of the Horace Williams Airport with consequences far greater than hose of the recent four crashes. The dangers from such accidents in areas with very low population densities are far less than from accidents] in the fully built-up areas that surround. Horace Williams Airport. We ask the Commissioners to consider carefully the consequences of such an event as they weigh the proposals before them. 91,1,1,i4-,Au.. 11/■6"41-4-4i.4."...., ' ' (<4.44/12.R._ Julianne M. Andresen Mary Q. Penta John W. Drake - L 4. March 28, 1983 To: Orange County Commissioners and Planning Board Members From: Citizens for Airport Planning Re: Conditions on New Orange County Airports We are, deeply interested in the issues before the Commissioners in the matter of Conditions for the operation of the proposed Midway Airport, because the th ee conditions in question, if applied generally, might al- together preclde the creation of a new airport anywhere within the County, . As testimony delivered at previous meetings, - .~ have indicated in we have long sought circumstances that would favor the establishment of an alternative tol the Horace Williams Airport. Although we do not seek to support specific locations, we note the overwhelming need for a facility in the southerh part of the County, close to Chapel Hill . The University's AHEC program other activities require that an airport not be too distant frum ' n, The University has stated unequivocally that they will not close down the Horace Williams Airport in favor of a site many miles away. If thel conditions now imposed upon the Midway Airport were to be extended to any airport in the County, they would effectively prevent its dexelopme We beleve that the Commissioners have been misled by their Plan- ning Staff's recommendation that the airport control 6000 feet beyond each end of the runWay. NO SUCH REQUIREMENT EXISTS FOR ANY AIRPORT WITHIN THE ENTIRE STATE, 'including the RDU airport, the Charlotte airport, and many others. Mr. B uoe E. Matthews of the North Carolina Department of Trans- portation, in his testimony before the Commissioners, pointed out that he knew of no comparable airport ANYWHERE IN THE NATION where such conditions were set. To require them of an Orange County facility is an anomaly with the potential to bar arkt new airport from the County. We believe that this anomaly has its roots in a basic technical misunderstanding. An FAA circular describes approach and departure clear- ances fpr a utility airport which amount to 5000 feet, but this is not in practice an F requirement. Instead, according to Mr. Matthews, the FAA is primarily concerned "that no naturally occurring obstruction penetrate the specified approach surface." This F/�` intent is the reason North ,, Carolina actoqly has controlled approaches of as few as 400 feet for pub- lic �. 8irpqrts, or as few as ten feet for private airports, located in relatively flalt areas. Mr. Matthews indicated that he views 1000 feet as | ' � | -2- O reasonable and safe distance for the clear zone for an airport such as the one currently under consideration. • The provision of a rapid-access road for fire private property ' the airport developers, while desirable in very general terms, is prevent the esItablishment of an airport anywhere in the County. If the Commissioners Ifeel that such a road is of overriding importance, they should be prenared to institute condemnation proceedings (in favor of Mid- way or any other private airport in the County) in order to achieve this end. Otherwisle, the objective is likely to be satisfied only by luck. It is air- port. It is Unreasonable, however, to set the level of such activity as a percentage of total activities. For instance, one of the first group of customers of of operating out Of Horace Williams Airport, and, depending upon the order in which these acOvities transferred, training flights might well exceed 50% in the early stages, even though only a handful of flights per day were involved. It ld be more suitable to institute controls based upon numbers rather thOn percentages, and a reasonable basis for such numbers would be the a tiVitv levels now in effect at Horace Williams Airport. ��!| We believe that it is only a matter of time until an accident Occurs in c1nitv of the Horace Williams Airport with consequences far greater than those of the recent four orasheS. The dangers from such accidents in 8 as with very low population densities are far less than from accidents in the fully built-up areas that surround Horace Williams Airport. We ask the Commissioners to consider carefully the consequences {� of such an event as they weigh the proposals before them. | ` m� kYn^ � K7- /; / � ` ' ' «°''~^�-- / Julianne M. Andresen Mary O. Penta John W. Drake ' ' i . 4 t•. t March 28, 1983 ,-..'., To: Orange County Commissioners and Planning Board Members From: Citizens for Airport Planning Re: Conditions on New Orange County Airports ',-- We are deeply interested in the issues before the Commissioners in -- the matter of conditions for the operation of the proposed Midway Airport, because the thee conditions in question, if applied generally, might al- together '- precltlide the creation of a new airport anywhere within the County. As we have indicated in testimony delivered at previous meetings, we have long sought circumstances that would favor the establishment of an alternative toithe Horace Williams Airport. Although we do not seek to support specific locations, we note the overwhelming need for a facility in the southertil part of the County, close to Chapel Hill . The University's AHEC program aid other activities require that an airport not be too distant from town. The University has stated unequivocally that they will not close down the Horace Williams Airport in favor of a site many miles away. If the conditions now imposed upon the Midway Airport were to be extended to any new airport in the County, they would effectively prevent its development. 1 We believe that the Commissioners have been misled by their Plan- ning Staff's recommendation that the airport control 5000 feet beyond each end of the runay. NO SUCH REQUIREMENT EXISTS FOR ANY AIRPORT WITHIN THE ENTIRE STATE, including the RDU airport, the Charlotte airport, and many others. Mr. Bruce E. Matthews of the North Carolina Department of Trans- portation, in is testimony before the Commissioners, pointed out that he - knew of no comparable airport ANYWHERE IN THE NATION where such conditions were set. To require them of an Orange County facility is an anomaly with the potential to bar any new airport from the County. We believe that this anomaly has its roots in a basic technical misunderstanding. An FAA circular describes approach and departure clear- ances for a utility airport which amount to 5000 feet, but this is not in practice an FAA requirement. Instead, according to Mr. Matthews, the FAA is primarily concerned "that no naturally occurring obstruction penetrate the specified approach surface." This FAA intent is the reason North Carolina actually has controlled approaches of as few as 400 feet for pub- lic airports, or as few as ten feet for private airports, located in relatively flat areas. Mr. Matthews indicated that he views 1000 feet as ........ - 11 4 g. , -2- .,, '-; a reasonable and safe distance for the clear zone for an airport such as the one currerltly under consideration. ,- , The *vision of a rapid-access road for fire vehicles through private property not owned by the airport developers, while desirable in . very general terms, is another requirement that would be very likely to prevent the establishment of an airport anywhere in the County. If the J Commissioners feel that such a road is of overriding importance, they should be pre ared to institute condemnation proceedings (in favor of Mid- way or any other private airport in the County) in order to achieve this end. Otherwise, the objective is likely to be satisfied only by luck. j- : It is reasonable to regulate flight training activities at an air- port. It is upreasonable, however, to set the level of such activity as a percentage of total activities. For instance, one of the first group of customers of any nearby airport is likely to be the complex of users now operating out pf Horace Williams Airport, and, depending upon the order in which these activities transferred, training flights might well exceed 50% in the early stages, even though only a handful of flights per day were involved. It Would be more suitable to institute controls based upon numbers rather than percentages, and a reasonable basis for such numbers would be the activity levels now in effect at Horace Williams Airport. L We believe that it is only a matter of time until an accident occurs in the vicinity of the Horace Williams Airport with consequences far greater than those of the recent four crashes. The dangers from such accidents in af'eas with very low population densities are far less than from accidents! in the fully built-up areas that surround Horace Williams Airport. We ail( the Commissioners to consider carefully the consequences of such an event as they weigh the proposals before them. Vd1 L Julianne M. Andresen Mary Q. Penta John W. Drake Page 1 . ' In order to understand how we have gotten where we are to- day , it is necessary to go back over a bit of history as h � � it s c �un- the zoning ordinance ax6in particular general avaition Airports . There are two major alternative methods local government may employ to regulate general aviation airpots : airport zoning or special use permits . In applying zoning to areas around a proposed airport local government attempts to control the types of land use that develop around the facility and especially within the approach surfaces of the runways . The ordinances also usually control the height of objects that may be constructed or grown within the approach surface. Zoning to control land use and height of objects a/5.pe usually to Co ifersotiork applied flirt� public airports . These facilities are ones which are constructed by a governmental agency with some level of Federal funding through the F. A. A. The agency charged with the construction of the airport , because it is public in nature , and can be expected to respond to the general pu6licl concerns , usually has the coopera- tion of the local government in setting the land use districts with- in the approach surfaces of the airport . The airport authority may 1144 = in fact have members appointed by the local government Board. Some .hc.c crDozAwitora luss4t.0 airport authorities have the power of eminent domain which could be $P021-move w*~GaviF used to secure property necessary for the safe operation of th e air- 04 ZAke - rt ' The construction .of a new public facility or the enlargement ell"-- -/zf an existing one would usually require the cooperation of the local emea government which in turn would require that the proposal he in con- fnrmance with the adopted plans of the local government . The other common method of local governmental control of general aviation airports is through the granting of Special Use Permits . In mid 1979 Orange County� oun y was in the middle of a complete zoning ' „ ` - -- i ' ' ' . Page 2 ordinance revision which included an evaluation of airports . Community airports were a special use under the old zoning ordinance and it was recommended by the Planning Board and approved by the Board of Commissioners to continue that treat- ment for ge era ) aviation airports under the revised urd1nance. Some of the advantages seen by the Staff, 7n treating air- ports as a pecial use were : . It appeared Orange County was not in a position to particlpatel, \ n a public airport . 2. The County did not plan to restrict^ develop- ment potential of property owners adjacent to any proposed private airport . 3. Given the above , the construction of a general aviation aiport would be a private venture , for the direct profit of the developers . It would be the responsibility of the developers to meet the requirements for a special use permit and any imposed con- ditions appl | ed at approval . Contained within the Orange County Zoning Ordinance is the | ` permitted use table. This table contains all of the various zoning districts and a listing of different types of land uses . A particular use has three possible designations within any given zoning district . It may be a permitted use , a non-permitted use or a Special Use . Permitted uses are allowed in a particular dis- trict , non-permitted uses are not allowed , and special uses may 6e ~]� — ( in a district if certain prescribed criteria are met and the permit issued . Special Uses because of their inherent nature , extent , or .- � | . � ---------- Page 3 . external ef ects require greater care in the control of their lo- _ cation and methods of operation , than permitted uses require, One of the important distinctions in the discussion of Mid- way Airport is the difference between a public and private airport . - I would like to quote from a letter by Harold k 6 � �� y arn o nsonAJated��March�00" • 5 , 1982" We have reviewed the layout plan as you requested . Since there y no requirement that private airports be developed to meet FAA standards , we would not want our comments to have an adverse effect on the development of a private air- port. The FAA standards are , of course , available for re- ference if a private developer desires to construct his facility to meet appropriate standards ' The only require- ment FAA has regarding privately owned airports is that a Notice of Proposed Construction be filed with the FAA. Mr. Robinson goes on . The use of FAA design standards is required when the airport in being constructed with federal aid' Similarly , if an air- port is constructed with private funds and future plans include convert ng it to a publicly-owned facility , with the intent of obtaining future federal aid , it would be desirable to plan and construct it in accordance with FAA standards . If a proponent should lsk our recommendations for development of a privately owned airport , we would recommend that the FAA standards be utilized . The FAA woes not require that private airports meet the standards they have developed for public airports , however , nty_ has chosen to r=q ire that developers of such airport facilities meet FAA standards ! . - | Page 4 . On September 7 , 1982 the Orange County Board of Commissioners !;,72, found that Buck Mountain Development had met the minimum requirn- menty for the issuance of a Class A Special Use Permit , however the Board al So felt that several additional conditions should also be impu w6 in the approval to assure that the development would protect the public health , safety and general welfare. One of the conditions was : -r: The appllcant shall own or control the height of objects in the area t each and of the runway which is know as the approach- ' departure zorie. The approach-departure zone begins 200^ from the t; end of the rdnway and rises at a 20 , 1 slope to a height of 250^ at a distance of 5000' . The zone is 500' in width at its begYning and 2000' in width at its end . The easement rights negotiated with each property owner must specify that the developer can control the heights of objects within the approach-departure zone. All easement agreements and other evidence of ownership of the approach-departure zone shall be in form and content approved by the County Attorney. /v DNS c�^� T��` ���mn�F c�*�T�"n4G�� /r4 ��/4 �� A , s-prow 14 0-3 rc & PA-GS I - roe. ���r� ���xw*���� ^ _~, . . '~ . '` . �- -- 5000" -- >� 1 � . I I X -� I I --A- ------• � ~` �� "" > ' ~ APPROACH -APPROACH ^- c^ __ 600" '- -- � 04 DEARTURE � ZONE r | I ^ ���" � --~-~' ' \ \ _ ' � � - - Page 5 SOA ��� ��^~- Some Important of\nit[ons4re: 1) Primary surface. A surface longitudinally centered on a runway. When the runway has a specially prepared hard surface, the primary surface extends 200 feet beyond each end of that runway. 2) Aaroach surface. A surface longitudinally centered on the extended runway centerline and extending outward and upward from each end of the primary surfaca. An approach surface io applied to each end of each runway based upon the type of app ' ach available or planned for that runway end.. . (1) The inner edge of the approach surface is the same width as the . primary surface and expands uniformly to a width of: 2000 feet for that end nL of a utility rurway with a nonpreciS\on instrument approach: (2) The approach surface extends for a horizontal distance of: 5,000 fwe^&ea slope of 20 to l isloto a maximum height of 250/ for all utility and visual ; The runway clear zone is an area at ground level that - begins at each end of the primary surface. .. and extends with the width of the approach surface , . , ' to terminate directly . , ' where the slope reache4s a height of 50 feet above the runway end or 50 feet above the terrain, Mr. Bruce Matthews of the North Carolina Department of Transportation, Division of Aviation, in a letter dated 3/17/83, addressed to Mr. John Northen, attorney for Buck Mountain, brings up the point that many airports in other jurisdictions do no ' ' ' --l '� 4h sucb r�o r*us standards. ~ 4Jw� aW»& All of the al rporO in Wake County were built and in operation before Wake County saw the need to zone the areas adjacent to the airports. The Wake County Zoning Ordinance regulates types of land uses within the approach zone specifically prohibiting residential development and places of public assembly. Orange County was in the position in 1981 to have zoning in place prior to the commencement of operation of an airport. '. ___ ' rl \-I Page 6 !i'. ,11 ':,: ,24. Again the concept of the Special Use Permit as applied to General -?2, Aviation Airport is to put the responsibility for the safe operation of the L -- r facility on the developer„ It was not the intention of the County to exercise it police power Of zoning to restrict development potential of property adjacent to an irport, but to require the developer to negotiate with these J adjacent property owners to secure easements to restrict the height of objects which might interfer with safe operations, The developers have requested that 3 other conditions imposed on the approval of thr Special. Use Permit be modified or deleted. The Speci61 Use process requires that all uses proposed by an applicant I I be specifically listed on the site plan. The developers of Midway Airport have provided a list of particular uses which may be a part of the overall Airport development. The FBO and Maintenance hangars are for maintenance of aircraft and operations of the airport. Spaces in these buildings will include the following: ,....b. Large maintedance area for 2-3 aircraft -- 1. Mechanic training area v1 . Part sales and service --- m. Storage area -Pt:ID/1AS 1 c. Radio sales and service w-11. Toilets d. Pilot ready room o. Miscellaneous space for the ,-- r • e. Lounge following future uses: w 40 .- Exhibition area 1 —f. Concession area (4'4e. .---g. Office for aircraft manager and staff ad - Ticket sales and information .....41. Courtesy offices for tenants and transients for sports E., cultural events —1. Car rental office AA — Real estate welcome area (accompanying parking) Ab - Branch banking area NIT j. Aircraft sal4s office 05111. - Stranded holdover area /k. Pilot training office it° - Hospitality room The applicants have indicated they can not now say how much of the hanger I areas will be devoted to the above list. Some of the listed uses are clearly accessory to the principal use of the property as a general avaition airport. Other uses are not so clearly accessory and in fact may have considerable I adverse impact on the surrounding property. Branch banking services and real estate sales offices while sometimes associated with larger airport facilities are out of place in a location like Bingham Township. The uses such as banks and offices could have a tendency to attract customers to the airport far in I . er 4tErm excess of niumber of people who would be using the airport to fly airplanes. ^ 0a the amount of motor vehicle traffic increases so does the adverse impacts . associated Airport. � addition In �o�ion to not being able to quantify the amount of motor vehicle traffic associated with the related uses proposed for the airporL, the request to remove amount of traffic on highway 51. The 50% limit on flight traindng, was 1oteu— ' dcd to miniMize the amount of noise created by airplanes making practice runs the at - --p- -' 0151 In order o estimate tha�impact of t4h =' is necessary to be able | etim0e611-tm know the number of aircraft operations anticipated. The number of operat [ ons Jmidimmillim- effects the number of motor vehicle trips which would take place on Hwy 54 and would also effect the size of the noise contours generated by the aircraft using the facility. By restricting the number of flight training operations the Planning Staff believes that the number of motor vehiCle trips .on Hwy 54 can be kept downliadd the amount of noise generated by airplanes. The Planning Staff would defer to |8nuc Matthews' figures for motor e r vehicle trips c ps cpntainod in a letter dated 6430/82, in which he estimated the number of vehicle trips per day to be between 9 14 5 (based on the number of operations) to 1600 trips (based on the number of based aircraft) . Matthews indicated the the North Carolina Department of Transportation felt-more comfortable with the trip generation figure based on operations. The area included in noise contours around the airport expand as the number of operations ncreasc' fire s�� x�� condition the developers would like to have deleted concerns f the irc truck access required to the property from Teer Road. The Orange Grove Fire Department asked that the road be required so that the response time to a fire alarm might be reduced. The Planning Staff feels that the conditions as they existed on - September 7, 1982, have not changed and therefore staff does not feel it is necessary to Modify, amend or delete any of the conditions impb»ed on the approval of the Special Use Pennir.