HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 01-24-1983 -- 5
ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
REGULAR MEETING
7:30 P.M. MONDAY
JANUARY 24, 1983
SUPERIOR COURTROOM
ORANGE COUNTY COURTHOUSE
HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA
A. BOARD COMMENTS
B. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
1. Matters on the printed agenda
2. Matters not on the printed agenda
C. MINUTES January 4, 1983
D. JOINT PUBLIC HEARING WITH THE ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
1. Land Use Plan Amendment--James Rae Freeland
2. Rezoning Request--James Rae Freeland
3. The Timbers--Fred Cates
E. BOARD DECISION ITEMS
1. Budget Amendments
2. Discretionary Grants Program
3. Landfill Survey Contract
F. REPORT--SLIDE PRESENTATION ON THE TRIANGLE AREA
•
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
AGENDA ADDENDA
JANUARY 24, 1993
E. BOARD DECISIONS
4. Driver's License Examiner's Office--South Orange
5, Latimer Street--SR 1162
, L
.,�.
. MINUTES
JANUARY 24, 1983
The Orange County Board of Commissioners met in regular session on Monday,
. January 24, 1983, at 7:30 P.M. in the Superior Courtroom, Orange County Courthouse,
Hillsborough, North Carolina.
Commissioners present: Richard E. Whitted, Chair, and Commissioners Ben Lloyd,
• Shirley E. Marshall, Norman Walker, and Don Wil7hnit.
Commissioner Whitted announced that the Joint Public Hearing scheduled with
. the Planning Board would be held at this time; he reviewed procedures for the joint
, public hearing.
Planning Board Members present: Logan Irvin, Chair, and Tom Bacon, Alice Gordon,
Nancy Lazslo, Hazel Lunnford, Sharlene Pilkey, David Shanklin and Carl Walters.
Planning Board Members absent: Sally 8oericke, Pat Crawford, John Kizer and
, John Wilson.
D. JOINT PUBLIC HEARING WITH THE PLANNING BOARD
" l, Land Use Plan Amendment--James Rae Freeland
.
Ms. Susan Smith, Planning Staff, made the presentation to the Boards; she
. said the request is to amend the Land Use Plan from Twenty Year Transition and
^ Rural Residential to Ten Year Transition for the 149.3 acre tract located in Hills-
, borough Township at the southwest intersection of 1-85 and NC 86, (For specifics
• see abstract page on page b// of these Minutes.) She concluded, saying that the
^ Planning Staff recommended the Land Use Plan be amended as requested.
Planning Board Member Pilkey: Asked if the Town of Hillsborough Planning Board
. had any comments on the proposed amendments.
^
Commissioner Whitted responded that the Commissioners had received such a letter
^ this evening and that the record would reflect that the letter was on file. (See
• page of these Minutes for that letter.) Ms. Smith said the letter really
^
addressed issues raised by the proposed subdivision rather than the proposed Land
, Use Plan Amendment,
Planning Board Chair Irvin: Asked that those in favor of the proposal speak.
, Mr. James Rae Freeland: Referred to the Planning Staff's recommendation (cited
7- ?ade) and mskeH 5Laff meant by "public sewer" or if a
. treatment plant would !- oc|udeo in its definition of "public sewer."
. — -
�".
Mo. Smith: Replied that this recommendation was really directed at the intended
use of the tract and therefore would be more specifically addressed at the rezoning
request to be heard shortly; however, she said the Staff did mean tapping onto Hills-
borough's sewer system.
Mr. Freeland: Said that he intended to tap onto Hillsborough's system when
the number of customers warranted the expense. Until that time, however, he had
' planned on using a package treatment system approved by the NC Department of Natural
Resources. He said he will "meet all State criteria."
• Mr. Irvin: Asked what would be done with the effluent if a package treatment
' plant was used.
Mr. Freeland: Responded that there was a creek on the property and using flow
data his consultants would work with the State to design the treatment plant and
best care for the effluent. He said Mr. Bud McCall of McCall Brothers of Charlotte
^ were the consultants and would be able to answer any questions,
Mr. McCall : Said that any statements at this point would be preliminary.
He continued, that the State "has very strict criteria" in the design and treatment
` of any package treatment plant. He said the existing stream would be regulated by
• the State and EPA under their "design criteria" which must be met. He asserted that
▪ the effluent, under these standards, would be better quality than the quality of
▪ water in the stream. He said he has not received the specific State requirements
• and would be unable to be more specific than all requirements set by the State
• would be met.
"
Commissioner Willhoit: Asked Mr. McCall to define "quality" in his use of the
o term ''the quality will be better than what was there before."
Mr. McCall : That it is capable of sustaining wildlife, fish and acquatic growth;
• that the water in the stream will be equal to or better than the water presently in
• the stream. He said once the plant is installed a certified operator must be hired
• to operate the plant; he added that water samples may be required to be sent in
"veekly or monthly to be sure standards are met. Mr' McCall continued, replying to a
" technical question from Commissioner Willhoit, that the process, "I would think, in
•a case like this...wnuld require what we call extended aeriation, tertiary plant
•folluwing it, which is filtration to remove all solids and chlorination and perhaps
•even removal of the chlorine there...."
• Mr. Freeland: Replying to Ms. Pilkey. mid this stream fed into Cates Creek.
•
•
•
J �
Commissioner Lloyd asked if this or a similar system was presently working
anywhere in the State. Mr. McCall said there were oeveral .
There were no further comments either for or against the proposed Land Use
Plan Amendment.
0-2 Rezoning Request--James Rae Freeland
Mr. Marvin Collins, Planning Director, made the presentation for the rezoning
request to the Boards. He said the request is for the ten southernmost acres of
' this 149.3 acre tractto be rezoned from Rural Residential (R-1) to Residential-4
' (R-4). To obtain this rezoning the Land Use Plan would have to be changed to
' Ten Year Transition (simply extending the present Ten Year Transition from 1-85
' south to emcompass this area). Mr. Collins listed the criteria to change the
' designation (see abstract page attached to and part of these minutes on page =�o�-1
' of this Book). Mr. Collins said the ten acre rezoning request by itself would
` have little impact; however, with the entire development there could be significant
' impact. Mr. Collins listed some concerns of the Planning Staff: 1) ability of the
' existing school system to handle the influx of students; 2) site accessibility
^ (turn lanes); and, 3) provision of water and sewer services for the site.
• Ms. Pilkey asked that the letter from the Town of Hillsborough be read into the
^ record (previously cited); Mr. Irvin complied.
Mr. Freeland asked to respond to the contents of the letter. Mr. Freeland said
^ he felt that the package treatment plant would be a reasonable alternative to tapping
, onto Hillsborough's sewer lines until the development was large enough to justify
" the expense of tap-ons. For the turn lanes, Mr' Freeland said the NC Department of
" Transportation would be making recommendations to facilitate access to the site and
^ was unable to "make any commitment" without knowing Mr. Mills' (NCDOT) recommendations.
▪ Mr. Freeland continued saying that he planned to pave the interior streets and provide
^ open space for recreation; he had not given any thought, however, to placing utilities
, underground.
^ Planning Board Member Lunsford: Asked if the entire area south of the railroad
" track was to be zoned residential,
^
Mr Freeland replied that a portion of it was requested for industrial with the
• area north of tne rvii'oad ccck to be zoned commercial . However, he added that
• he would be willing to have the entire southern portion residential with the area
• north of the railroad track industrial.
• Ms. Lunsford expressed concerns regarding traffic safety in the area.
. �
�3~
Planning Board Member Shanklin: Said that a layman (referring to the letter
from the Town of Hillsborough Planning Board) had said the package treatment plant
would be insufficient; Mr. Shanklin asked if the expert (consultant from Charlotte)
would clear up the question of its (the package treatment plant) efficiency.
Mr. McCall : Said that since the letter writer was not specific as to the
deficiencies in such a package treatment plant his only comment would be to reiterate
his earlier statement, i.e., those "same State agencies which would regulate dis-
charge from municipalities under the guidelines of the EPA in the Federal Government
as well as the 5tate. The same agencies regulate it all so the effluent or dis-
charged waters from a package plant would be equal to or better quality than anything
that is going into the stream already."
Mr. Shanklin: "So in your opinion, the package treatment plant would be suffiCient?"
Mr. McCall: "Yes. It would have to be."
Planning Board Member Gordon: Asked Mr' McCall if he didn't know what the
. requ$rements would be how could he know the package treatment plant could meet them.
Mr. McCall: Said that waste water could be treated to any degree that you
wished. He added that "filtration is the key to it."
Commissioner Willhoit: Noted that the County planned to solve the Efland Estates
septic tank problem with a similar package treatment plant so there was no question
, of such a plant's efficiency. He did, however, address a question to Planning Staff:
. to wit, had the Staff ever looked into allowing package treatment plants as interim
. solutions until water and sewer lines could be extended.
Ms. Smith: Replied that such an interim solution had not been considered
. specifically. With regard to this specific proposal, there was reluctance on the
. part of the Staff to see "a number of package plants" placed there to serve the
` scope of the development. Staff preferred to see water and sewer lines extended to
' serve that development.
Commissioner Willhoit: Reflecting that Mr. Freeland had indicated that when the
, development reached a certain size he would tap on or extend the lines to serve the
development. He wondered how large that size might be; what number of units might
, make such a tie on feasible,
Ms. Collins: Referred to previous discussions with Mr. Freeland and said that
to dwelling units." He added
this particular treatment plant would support "up ry l2�
that "a twin" plant next to the proposed one would increase the capacity to 250
. dwelling units. The Planning Staff's concern is that prior to completion of the
development, which could be "covered with two twin" package treatment systems,
that plans be made to tie on to the Hillsborough system.
Commissioner Marshall: Asked if we shouldn't have standards for a cut off
point for interim use of package treatment pIanta.
Mr. Collins: Said that at present we had no such standards or policy on what
a cut off point might be.
Ms. Gordon: Asked why the staging of the development was being planned from
. south to north rather than north to south where initially you would be nearer the
sewage lines.
Mr. Freeland: Replied that the financing agreement released the land from south
. to north and that was the reason for its development in that direction.
Ms. Gordon: Asked for the credentials of Mr. Freeland's consultant, Mr. McCall.
Mr. McCall: "I'm Buck McCall, Vice president of McCall Brothers Incorporated,
, from Charlotte. We've been in business thirty-six years, in the water sewer business,
. general contractors, unlimited license,"
There were no others who wished to speak either in favor or opposed to the
' rezoning request from Mr. James Rae Freeland. Mr. Irvin turned the floor over
, to Commissioner Whitted to chair the Special Use Permit from The Timbers.
0-3 The Timbers--Amendment and Addition to the Planned Development, Rezoning
and Special Use Permit.
Both Mr, Collins and Mr. Fred Cates were sworn,
Mr. Collins made the presentation to the Boards. He said this was a request
• from Mr. Cates for an amendment and addition to the Class A Special Use Permit
for a Planned Development-8 granted to The Timbers last February. The amendment
, will allow, by realignment of one of the roads, an additional ten mobile home units.
• (For specifics see the abstract page attached to these minutes on page /7/0 of
• this book.) Mr. Collins said this request, if,approved, would increase the number
, of units from the 76 approved by the Board on February 1, 1983` to 88; some of these
▪ additional units are to be double wide units. The site plan has been revised to
, accommodate these changes. Staff thinks the revision is consistent with the original
~ request, said Mr. Collins. Mr. Collins listed conditions which Staff recommends be
~ placed on Phase IV of The Timbers if the Board grants the request:
1) a f�,.r foot gravel walkwPy Lvnstructed between the row of mobile homes
in Phase III and t|e s�.,ile homes on Timber Drive;
• 2) a four foot walkway be shown on the east side of Timber Drive on the final
plat;
` [
3) Phase IV be completed prior to June 1, 1983;
4) thirty thitfty foot drainage easement be shown on the final plat between
units 83 and 84;
5) a final site plan showing the existing three Phases and the proposed
fourth Phase be submitted to the Planning Department prior to the
issuance of the revised Special Use Permit;
0) the developer resubmit from a qualified engineer a construction estimate
for Phase IV to insure adequate escrow for the required public improvements;
7) that the pond shown on the revised site plan beincluded in Phase IV and cum-
` pleted prior to June 1, 1983;
8) that single wide units be allowed where double wide units are shown on
on the site plan but that no double wide units be allowed where single
wide units are shown on the site plan. This is to ensure compliance with
set back requirements.
There were no questions from either Board on the presentation.
Mr. Fred Cates, developer, said that he agreed with all the stipulations as
, outlined by Mr. Collins. One addition concerns # 6, said Mr. Cates, regarding
a letter of credit or bond; he said that he had just received a commitment in Phase
. IV for that money "and we can get a letter stipulating that so that will be the
, same purpose and release the bond that we already have. That's what we'd like to
, do, rather than having two bonds."
Mr. Cates showed the I-40 right-of-way to the Boards as requested by Ms. Pflkey,
Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall , to adjourn this
, public hearing on the Class A Special Use Permit amendment and addition for The
Timbers to 10:30 A.M. on March 7, I983, for the purpose of receiving the Planning
• Board's recommendation on this request. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, O.
This concluded the Joint Public Hearing of the Board of Commissioners and
^ the Orange County Planning Board. Following a five minute recess the Board of
Commissioners resumed its regular agenda with all members present'
.
A. BOARD COMMENTS
Commissioner Whitted added two addenda: Drivers' License Space and Latimer Street
Petition. Commissioner Willhoit added consideration of the numbering of streets in
, southeast Orange County.
B. AUDIENCE COMMENTS: There were no persons who wished to speak to the Board
, regarding items either on or not on the printed agenda.
C. MINUTES
Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Narshall , to approve the
Minutes of January 4, 1983, as corrected, Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, 0'
`
"
^'��
E-S LATIMER STREET-- PETITION
Ms' Susan Smith presented details of the residents' request to the Board of
Commissioners (see the abstract attached to and part of these Minutes on page �S^��6/
A
of this book). Mr. Larry Carter, spokesman for the residents, told the Board
that since none of the residents owned the property that fronted on the unpaved
, 2/10 mile of Latimer Street they felt they should not have to pay for its being
paved under any of the NC DOT's paving programs (for example, Participatory
` Paving Program or Property Owner's Participation). Commissioner Whitted reminded
' Mr. Carter that, unlike the Town, the County does not have a road paving program.
Mr. Carter added that the 2/10 mile unpaved portion of Latimer Street is in poor
. condition and not properly maintained by the State. He asked the Commissioners
. to petition the State to pave that portion of the road at no cost to the people
. who use the road; adding that the majority of residents are on disability or fixed
. incomes.
Commissioner Ni7lhnit moved, seconded by Commissioner Walker, to petition the
, State to pave the 2/I0 mile section of Latimer Street (SR 1I82). Vote: Ayes, 5;
` noes, O.
The Board added that the letter to DOT would include a request for regular
, maintenance to Latimer Street. (Petition presented by Mr. Carter is on permanent
, file with the agenda attachments for the date of this meeting in the Office of the
` Clerk to the Board.)
^ E-1 BUDGET AMENDMENTS
Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall , to approve
' the budget amendments as recommended by the Manager. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, O.
. (See pages /35/ of this book for those budget amendments attached to and part
, of these Minutes.)
E-2 DISCRETIONARY GRANTS PROGRAM
Commissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Nillhoit, to approve the
, submission of a preapplication to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
, for a grant for funds to define ways to strengthen the current annual planning pro-
cess for the Department of Social Services. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, O.
E-3 SURVEYING CONTRACT AWARD
The Manager told the Board that the County had requested three bids for the
, cost of surveying the 67 acre landfill tract in the Northern Fairview Community be'
fore the purchase of 41.6 acres for the Community Park. The results are:
"
Alois Callemyn $18,076
John McAdams Co. $I4^050
A'T. Davison No Bid
Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall , to approve
the Manager's recommendation to award the contract for the survey of the Landfill
site in Hillsborough to John McAdams Company for $I4,060 as the lowest responsible
bidder. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, O.
E-4 DRIVERS' LICENSE OFFICE
Lloyd,
Commissioner Walker moved, seconded by Commissioner to authorize the
' Manager to initiate renovation and to negotiate a lease with the Town of Carrbbro
' for space for the Drivers' License Examiner's Office in southern Orange. Vote:
��
' Ayes, 5; noes, O. (See abstract on page �r/ o f these e Minutes.)
E-6 NUMBERING OF STREETS IN SOUTH ORANGE
Commissioner Willhoit said citizens in south Orange had told him that the Post
' Office was re-numbering the rural routes in that area again. Commissioner Willhoit
' requested the Manager to check into the possibility of having the Post Office assign
' street numbers or lot numbers at intervals to these homes. Commissioner Willhoit
` said this was a charge to the Road Naming Commission but had not been done yet; he
' asked the Manager to get this information from the Post Office and to schedule this
' topic on a third Tuesday meeting and to advertise it in order to ascertain community
^ interest in having street/lot numbers assigned' The Board requested the Manager to
` follow through on Commissioner Willhoit's request.
F-REPORT
° Mr. Ray Green of the Triangle J Council of Governments presented a slide show
` and oral report on the Triangle Area Development Plan. Following the presentation
' Mr. Green told the Board COG planned two conferences: 1) a Regional Forum to produce
^ a draft document on problems, solutions and actions for specific local governments;
` and, 2) a Regional Retreat which will take the draft document produced at the first
' Forum and refine it into a consensus document on problems, solutions and specific
actions for local governments in the Triangle area, Mr. Green said the Triangle J
" is not asking for financial support but is asking that Orange County co-sponsor both
^ conferences, thereby lending its support.
Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall , to adopt a
Resolution pledging Orange County's cooperation and participation in the conferences
" agreeing to be a co-sponsor, Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, O.
.
.
^ �
�� .
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS this region is the fastest growing in the State of North
Carolina, which is itself one of the more rapidly-growing states, and
WHEREAS rapid growth is expected to continue for at least the next :'-'
two decades, bringing a mixture of opportunities and problems which need
to be addressed now if the quality of life in this region is to be
preserved, and
WHEREAS the Triangle J Council of Governments is drawing up plans
for a conference or conferences in the Spring of 1983 to explore the
development-related issues and assist city and county officials in
reaching a consensus on goals and strategies to preserve our quality of
life,
NOW, THEREFORE be it resolved that the Board of Commissioners of
the County of Orange pledges its cooperation and participation in the
conferences and agrees to be a co-sponsor.
This the -WI'ua' of , 1983.
9 w
- �
_ '
� ~`
' The Manger told the Board he had one additional item: a request that the Board
^ approve a preapplication from the Department of Social Services for State HDS FY1983
' Coordinated Discretionary Funds. Social Services Director Tom Ward said there was
' no cash outlay required from the County for the program for "Comparing Two Models
' of Parent Education for Abusing and Neglecting Families, Commissioner Marshall moved,
' seconded by Commissioner Nfllhoit to approve the preapplication for the above project.
' Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, O. The Board requested a copy of the program.
` Commissioner Lloyd moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall , to adjourn. Vote:
` Ayes, 5; noes, 0.
` Richard E. Whitted, Chair
' Paulette Pridgen, Clerk
■17'.
INDEX
•
JANUARY 24, 1983
AGENDA ITEM H TOPIC ABSTRACT PAGE-PAGE
D JOINT PUBLIC HEARING
W/PLANNING BOARD
1. LUP Amendment--J.R. Freeland 1 1-3
2. Rezoning Request--J.R. Freeland 4 4-8
3. The Timbers--Amend./Addition 9 9-16
E. BOARD DECISIONS
1. Budget Amendment 17 17-18
2. Discretionary Grants Program 19 19
3. Surveying Contract Award 20 20
a.
2.
3.
4. RESOLUTION
4
5.
6. WHERE, 5 this region is the fastest growing in the State of North
7. Carolina, which is Itself one of the more rapidly-growing states, and
8.
9. WHEREAS rapid growth is expected to continue for at least the next
10. two decadesl, bringing a mixture of opportunities and problems which need
11. to be addressed now if the quality of life in this region is to be
12. preserved, and
13.
WHEREAS the Triangle J Council of Governments is drawing up plans
15.
for a conference or conferences in the Spring of 1983 to explore the
16.
development-related issues and assist city and county officials in
17.
reaching a J.onsensus on goals and strategies to preserve our quality of
18.
life,
19.
20.
NOW, THEREFORE be it resolved that the Board of Commissioners of
21.
the County 7f Orange pledges its cooperation and participation in the
22.
conferences and agrees to be a co-sponsor.
23.
214..
This the ‘21/5-4 day of 41 , 1983.
25.
/2
26. fif` 7
AMMAINIF9r // _
.-
27.
28.
29.
30. _
31•
32.
MANGE COUNT (48.
BOARD OF Ca.2,1ISSIONS Action Agenda
t,
ACTICN AGENDA rmm issmcT Item To.
MEETING DATE 1/24/83 ______
Subject: Amendment to the Land Use Plan for 149,3 acres in'Hillsborough Township
requested by James Rae Freeland,
LpepartTe.
nt: Planning Public Hearing: X yes no
Attadinnmnt(e) : w
laormation Contct:
Susan Smith
Location Map
Phalle NLMMINIC: 732-8181, EXT. 359
PLTRPCZE: To receive citizen input and comments on the proposed change to the Land Use
Plan for 149.3 acres in Hillsborough Township from Twenty Year Transition
and Rural Residential to Ten Year Transition.
NEED:
The applicant has requested that 149.3 acres located at the southwest inter-
section of 1-85 and NC 86 in Hillsborough Township be redesignated as Ten
Year Transition, The tract is bissected by the main line of the Southern
Railroad. The portion of the tract north of the Southern Railroad line is
presently designated Twenty Year Transition Area. The portion of the tract
south of the Southern Railroad line is presently designated Rural Residential,
The entire portion of the tract north of the railroad and the northernmost
portion of the tract south of the railroad are within the Harmon Young (HB-4)
activity node.
The 149.3 acre tract is bounded on the north by 1-85 and NC 86 interchange;
on the east by the properties of Paliouras Enterprise, Paul T. McAllister,
Josephine Harrison, James Ervin Rigsbee, DeWitt Lassiter, Joseph Lassiter,
Meadie Arnold Turner, and Joppa Oaks subdivision and Piedmont Power; on the
south by the properties of Archie E. Millis, Woods Brothers, Inc. and
Stagecoach Run subdivision; and on the west by the properties of Amy E.
Burcham, C. T. Cook, Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., and Central Carolina Farmers
(FCX Inc.),
The applicant has also submitted a request that the southernmost 10 acres be
rezoned from R-1 to R-4 medium intensity residential. The proposed amendment
to the Land Use Plan would allow for the proposed use of the southernmost 10
acres.
IMPACT: The proposed change to the Land Use Plan would extend the 10-year Transition
Area for Hillsborough from the northwest intersection of 1-85 and NC 86 south
to encompass the entire 149.3 acre tract. The proposal would not be incompatible
with the existing development in the area. The tract has frontage on NC 86 at
the northeastern and southeastern corners of the property and is readily accessible
from the I-85 and NC 86 interchange.
ZECOMMENDATION: The Planning Staff recommends approval of the requested change to the Land Use
Plan. For the Board's information, staff will be reviewing and revising the
HB-4 activity node and vicinity at a later date as part of the annual work
program. Staff also recommends that prior to development of the tract that a
sketch plan for the entire tract be submitted indicating the approximate location
and density of proposed uses and that development of the tract at densities
greater than one unit per acre be conditioned on the provision of public water
and sewer facilities.
EAST COAST LAND COMPANY, INC.
PORT O// 1 C 11 SOX 1 1 H 1 L L■•O R O U G N. N O R T H CAROLINA 272711
December 17, 1982
Mr. Fred Luce
Orange County Planning Dept.
Rillsborough, N. C. 27278
Dear Mr. Luce:
I would like to request a change in the land use plan of the property
shown on Hillsborough Township tax map #45 as tract !4. This property
is shown on the accompanying sketch as the grided area. At present the
land use plan is designated as rural-residential. I an requesting that
the land use plan designation be changed to 10 year transition.
Very truly yours,
EAST COAST LAND COMPANY
James Rae Freeland
JRF/sd
. ,-;,.,•)_.,,..7—--....--,,, Z1 ... --...---- .
--.A....... \
......... ,,„„„„ ,,,,..... _.._ \-
.,.„,,
•
---
......e-_,. ■,... '
- .
, ... ..... __. ....,
. 577:4 •
' '' '-...,---_,--..-/...:\ \f, ',. ,F.-- .„ • ....,, ..., 7/..kr-.. i
''.... '....S. ..,„..'
' \.1'. 17 37 AC \•■.., " +._'-' -'`,,, ''' '.4_,„„
/ '''''".., "'-''-eS'''''" -- :•...
i ettf,9 ,
',...„. - / .00
• \ ,/ ''1 -'-:" ,
3:44V Er CIVrAtt...• li 1 r
''' ..,_..:',"••,,,,,,,.. .,,,,,, . :;i...": :
,. i tz'z'i ,,-/ •I 1
----,..„
---...,„„....--s. --A _ ..'-..,,r515 VS s2 o.c..;,'t :0
• '0:4 \ \'''' t !
---....„ ./r4.7 \ \ 0'' . /
• .92. `-',..`,.. ' 0;4
.„,,, /
.,, ,,96 861 AC:\ \ ,-7, 7.4•WIT
d ka3Itt
_.......,...,,,..„,. I.L-ma. .,. \ \,,,,,E6,..,a3,=- . . ,
....... ,-,, ,...",■C
(2) ' ' NC71.-..."-''',...„. -;411‘ ' ; •
'1
11111W: ' "'-‘;:.''•Z.1 4Cq6 ..."-'-.••••• •;'..:.1 i.'aa,02 '
a A 1 L rf C,r2."":C.'1 57!*i';':• ::::.:,..:,,,,, AC•
. . 0 './.....t.„.,; S••••el• ..."*. s..„...„„
litiropp- .. ..,
=,..0... . • -4.4" ,, ---• .-4a' --••••::
.., •
--- . s=
- ----- --- ,.,,,- % •t 5 AC , ,
............olt •......._ 1., Jp.1 It 20 S, -
-..",.............. ..................... •-•••..., 11
I i ..'.')3';''';;;■," ...,, /
"•■ .., i
rill" (DT° i i ! I--
i 1 ( \ \
-------„:„:„. ----......., so 4.Q4AC I / i .
I SEE I /MAP 45A
•....,_",....--> A.,-,...,..-.. .... i -- ...1.-.
'....... ,.. P I•4err,44463
—............ tilge-rot.G.CAI: ...**.. (EA' 1 AC iii . • ` "'CA144 4...:7-
i szr A: .,,, ,......_ ..,,;. ,... ,, ......x,g....,5:-.:7
"'4L"
• F +
E. .1....
/ _____--Pg3
. .
I/ '-': . ',•.0 .
--.....,,,,,,,........_
7
//, ''A'• ''. „..,, 41 .. ) {.
Vt. .S4ACr v ,'
" 61'5SAA, i 1
- - ------- .
/1//1 A., - 0;rV _ ---""' ' CJI4
----":-.."... _,..,
. --
// • --.147,,,,,z
, •A I SE?...3.t _.......„, 9E2 MAP
I t !
.7BAC., 1 r • t o ta.IPPA OZA'S. O o
i/ 1
) I I
,
(1:96464
r I
...,
/, .. 3 92 AC
. m.
r MAP .-
„.._ „,,„_, ...._ ....... ___ .....„ ....
45 C i 4
1 (STA olECCACH LIAM S., ,,:o• is / i
--........_. ,,— , . 1 i
1414t, Lia5f Ali- .' . '
.,.. .-e., Abt..i.
1 t -
23) -. - - ....
1
OIRANZE COUNTY
" 1.4
.1-•-•
BOARD OF C24ISSIONERS Action Agenda
Vo.);)
ACTION AGENDA .1.11.1,1 A Item ESTRACT -
Par...CING DATE 1/24/83
Subject: Rezoning Application for James Freeland
Departmnt: Planning LPubLic Hearing: x yes
AttscIumnt(s) : Application, Tax Map info=zatial Coata=C: Marvin Collins
PhOne N1.MiMr: 732-8181 EXT. 347
PGRPOSE: To receive citizen input and comments on the proposed zoning change for ten
acres of property from R-1 to R-4 requested by James Freeland.
NEED: The property is located in Hillsborough Township and is shown as lot 4 on
Tax Map 45 adjacent to N.C. 86 and Wood Brothers, Inc. An R-4 zoning
classification would allow the development of a subdivision with a minimum
of 10,000 square foot single family lots. This medium intensity residential
district would require that public sewer and water exist at the site or be
proposed as part of the development. The developer proposed a package
sewer treatment plant to handle the first phases of development and extension
of city water lines also. The site is located in the Orange Rural Fire
District, The rezoning request covers the southernmost ten acres of this
tract.
IMPACT: the property is located in a Rural Residential area as designated by the
Land Use Plan. For the proposed rezoning to conform to the Land Use Plan,
the ten year transition area would have to be extended south from 1-85 to
encompass this area, Residential development at R-4 would not be incompatible
with the existing development in the area or with possible future development.
1
ECOMMENDATION: Planning Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request from R-1 to R-4,
provided that public water and sewer are provided as part of the development
process,
APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION
DATE
The Honorable Board of County Commissioners -
Orange County, North Carolina • .
COMMISSIONERS: (NAZYteugweiZraWrallf
The undersigned request that prop rty located onf'Tax Map Number 4-f_S-
4,_ ,
Block number-- , Lot ntrel-61-- _, Shown on'the accompanying plat,
which is presently in an _______T,=.1 District be rezoned to
___R•:__--_41.- • for the following reasons:
, ii ((b _
I.N\ kill... IL ka...:/1, 1,1. ......■ . ol.. -46.4 . koala..-A10, allr. •L
yr...
---4cN . I k &
• 'l . 1h
I \
... pa. . ...-.4-4.__do. • .
11111111MMVISMINIFIMIW -
... ■ %L_-. .‘NW. ft, b ' 1., %Mit
.•_r b. At ftd/AINS _ ... .t•-.4,m _111!. . le _r. •_
' ‘ 1 1 t
14.. •I •- (11.1 r. S. .. . aft ,MIL _
0 Mai i
#0 ..• Pralr-C1 P'''.'"-M.......j47-t") 1 0
Signed: Address:
■111) _ \ ....... ..._ de 1 %
— ..A v - la• ill*
..___. _____
REZONING REQUEST GI{CCKLIST �
cT.
_ -- —Current land use
Current zoning Total number of scree
Type of rezon vg ke nested— Proposed land use o t9a.7\ \
Tax ap� 8 —Number of lots -Vroposed Water Suppl.yt Public
GamsnuniCy_______ __
'Proposed Sews a Treatment: ity�_„_Sndividual septic tank _
Individual p g _
i Access onto state road U Average daily traffic count on the state road L:– �`j�escribe. existing
critical areas: Mood prone area Poorly drained areas
Streams ? ather,sensitive area
t
-Describe land uses in: General Area \',-vim}
Adjacent parcels of land . 9- > '
Lire District MA\N& 141,14J.
i
Y 3}
t
j
EAST COAST LAND COMPANY, INC.
POST OFFICE DOS 113 • HILLSBOROUGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27271
December 17, 1982
Mr. Rick Cannity
Orange County Planning Dept.
Hillsborough, N. C. 27278
Dear Mr. Cannity:
I would like to request zoning change on the southernmost ten
acres of the property shown on Hillsborough Township tax map
i45 as tract #4, This property is shown on the accompanying
sketch as the grided area. At present the property is zoned
R-1. I am requesting the the zoning be changed to R-4.
Yours truly,
Jams Rae Freeland
JRF/sd
_ _
•
1 r 1
r...- i .-1':14,.rtil ' ., -;::::'-'.._'7:0c3.:?:-
} i� 8 AC.
1 ��� I.17A`C i ., I..
F — G!!.'-. I.
SB181 ` �� 4?35 1.37
48 '–_ a 1
• 3=
1
I I:9.:AC. 1 to.1 - ,... } ?s
� — ) v , 6Ag I
-"JAMES-RAY rIZEELA .A . ' A�..
- =a-Tt,R—4 IM'sIS 4'1T _ �� f I m
IQ.o ,scF�E ft ! 6234 `\ S). I / NH
JO 4;04A1; r J
.} •�j MN r N
149.3 AC.CAi. 6A _ ILIAC 1 f -S,
aa38 /� H
\ 1 / Mil/f N
fi 1/ ,...
1/ p= MI'> 8c.
i / 5P4
- ----- ! MI' irA4.
1 4 // !1 k= P�R9_
__.I I _ I // rNr,/
1 -
6 4 6 26 ,°979 i , � Are
I 3.78 AC. ' / •
�\\ 1 6 .1 /
2s 1 / . ' Piedmont
\ 1 i 7.75 AC. ___ ) i/ paweh
1
9568 «�'/ 6464
r — /
N \ I _ / 33,92 AC,
1--
.s . MAP 45 C 1 45 //
\ (STAGECCACH RUN, 5EC I;
45! , `� I .'2� `�
RUN, ' —�_ _ I 3212 'r 27
JI �___ rLEitHER ROA6 `1 1 I 7960
.N,\� 1x .4 AC/ 487 AC 23
;T3=
\ -...,._ 1
_ 1 1 / 1
Fir, za
1r
I!_
OPANC-E COLIN72Y
BOARD OF CDr:LISSIONEPS Action
Item M.70- 3
AcTioN RGEL,:a4. FIESTPACT
hEETING DATE 1/24/83
Subject: Amendment and addition to The Timbers Planned Development - Residential
Eight (PD-R8) Rezoning and Special Use Permit.
Depart:Tent: P 1 ann in g Public Ile.a.ring: x yes no
Attalt(s) Application pg 1 t Inromraticri Contact: Rick Cannity
Narrative pp. 2-4, Letter pg. 5,
Tax Map 'pg. 6, Plan PhCzle NUmber: 732-8181 EXT. 347
..
.97RPCEE: To receive citizen input concerning a proposed amendment and addition to The
Timbers Mobile Home Park,
NEED: Fred Cates has requested an amendment and addition to the Timbers Mobile Home
Park, The Timbers was approved February 1, 1982 as a PD-R8 (Planned Development
Residential-8) zone, This revision and addition would realign one of the
roads in Phase IV and create 10 additional mobile home spaces, There would
be a total of 28 spaces in Phase IV and 90 spaces in the total development.
The site is located in the Orange Rural Fire District.
IMPACT: The property involved is located in a ten year transition area as designated
by the Land Use Plan, Floor area, open space and livability space requirements
are shown on the site plan for the total development. Privacy of each unit
is minimal due to close proximity of the mobile homes and minimal building
setbacks. A private paved road will be provided with public water and sewer.
All traffic will enter onto Orange Grove Road which is designated as a Collector
Road in the Orange County Land Use Plan,
:ECOMMENDATION: Planning Staff recommends approval.
, r
•_L
APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION
DATE October 18 1982
The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Orange County, North Carolina
^,LA 47i7
COMMISSIONERS: 1-
The undersigned request that property located on Tax Map Number 42 .
Block number A , Lot number 4 Shown on the accompanying plat,
which is presently in a PD-R8 R-I District be rezoned to
PD-88 • for the following reasons:
Signe'd: Address:
_17
ta ••
awnwwww.a.
wwwwwwwww.
w w
RRZOt1ING Ri` ;JLST �}[L,CKLI5T it
OWNER'S NAJJE I red Cate s
ADDRESS `
`--.
Current zoning n- 6
Total number of acre' 16 current land use
Mobile Home Paris
proposed land use Mobile Home Park
Type of rezoning tequested PF)-A x community,____��w -
Proposed Water Supply: Public
Tax map P A?_ Block �___�Number of Sots Individual septic tank
Public_ x Community___________, p existing
Individual proposed Sewage Treatment: — 6y3 from
Describe existing
Access onto state road # _ tnnr, _ ,Average daily traffic count on the state road �
Poorly drained areas None
critical areas: flood prone area
t
Other sensitive area
Streams
s
j Residential, sAoo$er1
-Describe land uses in: General Area
Adjacent parcels of land
Fire District
I
I .7
. •
r.;1 111
THE JOHN R. McADAIvIS COMPANY, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
100 HAYES BUILDING,GLEN LENNOX CENTER,CHAPEL HILL
PO.BOX 2896,CHAPEL HILL,NORTH CAROLINA 27514 (919)967/M.
THE TIMBERS
A MOBILE HOME PARK DEVELOPMENT
APPLICATION TO ORANGE COUNTY FOR REVISION TO
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
OCTOBER 22, 1962
INTRODUCTION
The Timbers Planned Development was approved by the Orange County Commissioners
in February, 1982, This is an application for a revision to that development,
specifically to Phase IV, to realign one of the roads and create 10 additional
mobile home spaces (for a total of 28 spaces in Phase IV, and 90 spaces in the
total development.)
This revision is occasioned by our discovery that the base map upon which we
designed the original, layout is in error; there is actually more property in
the tract than our original plat showed. This revised layout covers more land
totally, and the density of the development is still about the same as was the
case in the approved layout (4.93 units per acre) ,
LOCATION
The Timbers is located in Orange County, about one mile southwest of the Town
of Hillsborough. The site is to the northwest of Orange Grove Road and has
access off of Orange Grove Road, and is located immediately south of Interstate
85 and immediately east of the designated right-of-way for the proposed Inter-
state 40. The site occupies the western 16.5 acres of a tract of land that is
totally about 44 acres in size (after a 15.5 acre taking for the 1-40 right-of--
way).
DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT
The Timbers will, consist of 90 mobile homes, all of which will be on lots 40
feet wide. At the north end of the development is a 5.4 acre area reserved as
open space, in which will be built a small Pond. Access to The Timbers is off
of Orange Grove Road, and public water and sewer will be provided. All of the
land will be under common ownership, with spaces rented to the tenants. In
most cases the mobile homes themselves will be owned by the tenants.
ACCESS TO THE SITE
The Timbers is located about 900 feet off of Orange Grove Road, which is a
State-maintained, two-laned secondary road. Traveling northeastward on Orange
Grove Road, it is only 3/4 of a mile to reach the Town Limit line of
. ,
----------
Hillsborough. By traveling northeastward on Orange Grove Road and then taking
Old NC 86 south, one can get on 1-85 about two miles from The Timbers. By
traveling southwest on Orange Grove Road and taking two other State roads to
the west that cross under I-85, one can get into west Hillsborough in the area
of Hillsborough Textiles with about three miles of travel.
The traffic generated from The Timbers will not overload Orange Grove Road.
Although the current traffic ;oad on Orange Grove Road is not now known to the
Developer, The Timbers Development should add only about 100 vehicles per hour
to the peak hour traffic. (The average traffic generated by The Timbers
would be only about 30 vehicles per hour.) The peak hour capacity of Orange
Grove Road, assuming about 40 mile per hour traffic and typical delays for
turning onto Orange Grove Road, would be about 1600 cars per hour.
UTILITIES
Water and sewer service will be provided by connection to the Town of Hillsborough
systems. In the case of sewer, Hillsborough has a rather new 2.0 MGD wastewater
treatment plant that is currently operating at only 30 percent capacity. There
is an existing sewer force main that runs along Orange Grove Road from a pump
station at Grady Brown School and that force main has considerable excess
capacity to receive the wastewater flow from this development. The Developer
proposes to install a sewer pump station at the north edge of the mobile home
lots, and pumo the wastewater south along the entrance drive to a connection
into the existing force main at Orange Grove Road. Between the pump station and
the mobile home, all sewer service will be by gravity flow.
As for water service, the Town of Hillsborough has a rather new 3,0 MGD water
treatment plant facility, which is currently operating at only 37 percent
capacity. There is an existing waterline on Orange Grove Road which runs from
Hillsborough to the Grady Brown School, and this line also has considerable
excess capacity and can be tapped to serve The Timbers, The elevation of this
development is high relative to the elevation of the Town of Hillsborough, but
the waterline already has a booster pump station located approximately 2000
feet northeast of the site, which increases the pressure in the maximum sur-
face elevation in the area of The Timbers and Grade Brown School. The existing
waterline is 8 inches in diameter and the demand from The Timbers will not
place a significant burden on the line.
The streets will be maintained by the Developer, or his successor in ownership,
who will retain ownership of all of the land. The streets will be graded and
drained generally in accordance with NC DOT Subdivision Roads standards. Base
course will be 5 inches of ABC ("crusher run") , and then asphaltic surface
treatment will be applied to the surface.
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
An erosion control plan for development of The Timbers has been submitted to
and approved by the Orange County Erosion Control Officer.
(
FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS
The site plan submitted for this application for The Timbers indicates certain
areas of possible future development on the balance of the total 44 acre tract
of land. At the present time, the applicant intends neither to develop that
portion of the land indicated as "Possible Future" nor seek approval of that
possible layout as shown on the plan. The layout is presented simply to comply
with the County application requirements, and to indicate that a coordinated
development on the balance of the property is possible. The current portion
of the development for which approval is now sought is only that portion of
the development at the west end of the property which is bordered by a heavy
line and indicated to be The Timbers.
APPROPRIATENESS OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The Timbers Mobile Home Park will be developed to a density of about 6,2 units
per acre. The balance of the total tract is shown with development in the
range of 6 to 8 units per acre. Development to this density is appropriate
for this site for several. reasons. The site is extremely well located from the
standpoint of access. It is very close to Orange Grove Road, yet it is
buffered from the road by some internal buffering as well as some existing low
density residential uses to the south of the site. Orange Grove Road leads
directly into Hillsborough. Access to 1-85, or travel to Durham to the east
or Burlington to the west, is excellent. Access on State roads to west
Hillsborough, where several of the residents are likely to be employed, is also
quite good.
The site is also very well located with respect to utilities. As described
above, the Town of Hillsborough water and sewer already exist on Orange Grove
Road, and this development will not over burden those existing utilities.
Because of the existence of these utilities, and the considerable difficulty
with respect to providing sewer service in so many other areas of the County,
it is particularly appropriate that this site be developed for high density
residential use.
(
October 18, 1982
Orange County Planning Department
106 E. Margaret Lane
Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278
RE: The Timbers Mobile Home Park
ATTENTION: Mr. Rick Cannity
Gentlemen:
This is to certify that I, Fred S. Cates, Jr., am the Owner of the
tract of land in Hillsborough Township, Orange County, on Old Orange
Grove Road and south of Interstate 85, on which the mobile home park
"The Timbers" is under development. I certify further that I am in
agreement with all of the improvements, including buildings, roads,
parking, utilities, Pedestrian paths, landscaping, and recreational
amenities indicated on the attached site plan dated September 1, 1981,
and prepared by The Jahn R. McAdams Company, Inc.
•
T. 4
Ailos „Ar
llskIrD S. CATES, JR.
clw
Attachment
.
•
.
, 2c
+ . _
as
ill
38 if\()
IP
•
Ors Nu.,,,,,,A4- pk.1 Iwo Pt::543,15 /Iris..
, 1, 1 (P/0 1 FRED S.
# 'HRS
\ \ ""5" ,,/./. 08.4°3 ,
\ .
A 441:", I \ \
CI) 1 ' ,,/<' g `71/ AC. /
/
..._ --.,,,, _ _.0. _ — ", ——— / /7/ li* —...-----.—
\ \
...
, I ir ' 1.,7 / ./4" 1
7141 .
•
/\ ROAD
/'/ 1 :(1)"-:\"'\ 1 1
TI48 TIT ,-. Pb._....., ' ,. PIANNISICi- viWZ. bib-PM ikrr -
_,P.EZO - PliCS —ell— ___.1_____Ta.._ .1%, . 1 ,
,...al r---
- Exi•--: c:-. .i..-.---,____-17- ----cL-4-g .s---.,_-.A106. .-.P., diALT't.).- - -- -
iilL;i
_ ____
•
ORE CCZ.,7■TY
BOARD OF ca:ntssio-Ns ri(
Action rrle
Item -J-
No.,E
ACTIUg i:1GENDA J.Tc.:A. T.a.STPACT
r,41:zaKG DATE January 24, 1983 _
Subject: Latimer Street SR 1162
CepertTrent: Planning Public HeAring: yes x
Attachmmt(s) : Iniormatica Cont_ct: Susan Smith
Petition
Phone 732-8181 EXT. 359
PURPOSE: To consider the concerns of residents of Latimer Street and Kingsboro Estates
regarding the paving of two-tenths of a mile of Latimer Street.
The unpaved portion of Latimer Street connects two paved sections of Latimer
Street. The unpaved portion is fairly steep and in poor condition for travel.
NEED: Latimer Street extends from inside the corporate limits of Hillsborough to
Kingsboro Estates subdivision within the extra-territorial limits of Hillsborough.
The developer of Kingsboro Estates subdivision paved the streets within the
subdivision, including a portion of Latimer Street which serves the subdivision.
The Town of Hillsborough contracted with DDT to pave the one-tenth portion of
Latimer Street which extends to the corporate limits after many requests from
residents served by the road. The Town encumbered funds from Powell Bill monies
to pay for this work. However, the General Statutes restrict the use of these
funds outside of municipal corporate limits. Therefore, the Town could not use the
funds to pave the remaining length of road within the Town's extra territorial
area extending to the paved portion within Kingsboro Estates subdivision.
The residents of Latimer Street and Kingsboro Estates presented the attached
petition to the Town of Hillsborough at the Town Board's December 13, 1982
meeting requesting the Town to pave the unpaved portion of Latimer Street. The
Town considered the item But referred the residents to the County for action.
The Town also sent a letter to DOT endorsing the request for paving. DOT indicated
in a letter dated December 21, 1982 that the road was eligible for paving through
either the Participatory Paving Program (PRP) or Property Owners Participation
Program (I'LlR).
DOT maintains the entire length of Latimer Street including the unpaved two-tenths
of a mile outside the Town's corporate limits. DOT has indicated that Latimer
Street is considered to be a residential and subdivision street and, therefore,
the unpaved section is only eligible for paving under either the Participatory
Paving Program (t'.P.R) or the Property Owners Participatory Program (Bap). DOT
estimates the cost to grade, drain and pave one mile of road is $120,000. The
approximate cost to pave the two-tenths of a mile section of Latimer Street
would be $24,000, Under either the PPP..or Rap. program, the local share would be
$4.00 per linear foot or $4,224,00, The local share may be paid by the residents
of Latimer Street adjacent to the unpaved portion of road; by the residents
of Kingsboro Estates; or by the County. Payment by the residents adjacent to the
unpaved portion of road could be made under either the P22. or ROP. programs, Payment
by the residents of Kingsboro Estates or the County could be made only under the •
P.O.?. program. Mr. Larry Carter, spokesperson for the community served by
Latimer Street, has indicated that the majority of the residents served by the
unpaved portion of Latimer Street are unwilling to participate in either program.
LI
LL.SECYROV
zonmeg
• rtrre, 5
Wo.sacza.
r
Ph)5r.
IMPACT: Paving of the unpaved portion of the road would substantially improve the
access for all residents served by the road, as well as those residents of
Kingsboro Estates who use the road for access to the subdivision,
ECOMMENDATLON: The following options are available for consideration by the Board;
a) participation by the residents adjacent to the unpaved portion in
the P.P.P, or P.O.P. programs; b) participation by the residents
of Kingsboro Estates in the P,O.P. program; c) participation by
the County in the P,O,P. program; d) request DOT to reclassify the
road for paving under a non-participatory program,
As the Board decides,
- - • : • •
. _
_ ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMISSIONER.S Action Agenda
Item
ACTION AGEMA ITE4 ABSTRACT
rrrC DT E January 24, 1983
Subject: Budget Amendment
Departrant: Finance 1 Public Hring: yes no
Attachment s): Yes Information Contact: Patricia Stutts
Phona Nizbar: Ext. 495
PURPOSE: To consider proposed budget amendment
NEED: To transfer into the Sheriff's line item budgets funds previously
budgeted in contingencies for additional jailers.
DIRACT: This amendment will increase the funds available in the Sheriff's
budget for jailer salaries and fringe.
RECONMEgDATION: -Approval
ORANGE COUNTY'
PROPOSED
1952-33 BUDGET AMENDMENT
The 1932-33 Budget Ordinance of Orange County as adopted on June 22,
1932, and subsequently amended, is hereby amended as follows:
General Fund
Appropriation:
Sheriff $ 19,941.
Contingencies - Sheriff (19,941.)
To transfer budget for additional jailers from contingencies into the
Sheriff's budget
Adopted this day of , 1983%
_ ,
g e;' ic,29/erg--
Mayor (gaunt trihnr�
Lucius M.Cheshire Jr. atha Clerk
Commissioners
HILLSBOROUGH NORTH CAROLINA 27278 p:. W Johnson
Allen A. Lloyd Supt. Water Work:
W.Paul Martin �7t=]�r? C,E Rosemond
Remus J. Smith ? Street Sa t,
Rachel H.Stevens s. :- p
Lynwood j.Brown
' L D Wagoner
*-4 Chief of Police
q Arnold W.Hamlett
January 24, 198.3 �' stA
Orange County Commissioners
106 E. Margaret Lane
Hillsborough, N.C. 27278
Re: Rezoning request by Mr. James Rae Freeland for property on Highway 86
Dear Commissioners:
The Hillsborough Planning Board has the following comments regarding the
rezoning request:
1- Please consider the impact of the proposed development an the capacity
of the existing schools and the quality of education.
2- A pac ge treatment plant for sewa$e is not sufficient, and the Hills-
borough Planning Board feels that an interim package treatment plant
shouldlnot be allowed. Both water and sewer lines should be hooked up
.to_.t 41tllsborougl3..system with.•.the water lines looped to Hillsborough's
lines. ) Plans for water and sewer lines should be approved by the
appropriate State agencies and the Hillsborough Board of Commissioners.
Additionally, the Hillsborough Planning Board would like to bring to
Orange County Commissioners' attention some recommended improvements whichtwill
be pertinent at the time that a subdivision request is made for this property.
1- 'uteri r roads should be built and paved to State DOT Standards.
2- A thir lane should be constructed to DOT Standards and built onto
Highway' 86 from the northern property line at I-85 and Highway 86
intersection to the southern property line near Woods Brothers.
3- Developer should install underground utilities.
4- Consideration should be given open space or recreation area to be dedicated
by the developer.
Thank you for your consideration of these comments,
Sincerely, I
. 5. 'r d,
Frank Sheffiel•�+ `hairm 16\
Hillsborough Pl-nning Board
-
ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF OXIMISSIOWIS Actionagexoa
�� �
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT z��` mo.4--°~~
MEETING DATE January 24, 1983
Subject: Discretionary Grants Program
| Public Hearing: yes X no |
Attacboreot(s) : - Information Contact: social Services Director
732-9361 ext. 2O1
No County Manager's Office
Phone Number: 732-8181 ext. 591
zURmoGo` To consider submitting a competitive prea7plicutinn to the U. S. Department
of Health and Human Services (HHS) for funds to define ways to strengthen
the current annual planning process of the Department of Social Services,
NEED: With counties having to assume more responsibility for managing social services
while at the same time suffering cutbacks in funding, there is a greater need
to target resources to the most needy and to deliver services in the most
cost-effective manner, The Social Services Department has made nro"ress in
recent months to measure staff out?ut in relation to client data in order to
judge the meeting of mandates in the areas of adult services and abuse and
neglect cases. Building upon the experience there is a desire to design an
annual planning process for all of the department's programs,
Enabling funds have been found which, if apnroved, would ?av for technical
assistance necessary to work with the Social Service Board, Director, staff
and County Manager's Office in developing the plan elements. Specific content
of what the elements would consist is in the process of being drafted.
However it is expected to include: '
1. Analysis of current data generated by DSS and its utility in
an improved planning process.
2. Analysis of additional data required.
3. Determination of how the data will be used and what will be
required organizationally for the input, analysis and rank-
ordering of the data for decision-making.
4. Evaluate the impact of the planning process on a before and
after basis.
IMPACT: Project cost is expected to be about S20,000. The HHS portion would be
Sl5,000 and 55,90O County in-kind (non-cash).
If the prpa?plication is approved by HHS, the County will then need to submit
a more thorough application on a competitive basis'
RECOMMENDATION(S):
Approve submittal of the preapplication.
~—..^ ....
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agneda
Item uo ��- ~/
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
MEETING DATE January 24, 19O3
Subject: Surveying Contract Award
'
Department: Community Opvelopmpnt i Public Hearing: yes no
Attachment(s):� ' Information Contact:
Albert Kittrell
1Phone Number: 732-8181 Ext. 425
Purpose: To consider awarding surveying contrnctin conjunction with
partial acquisition of the former Hillsborough Landfill ,
1eeU�
Boundary surveying is necessary before property can be conveved
from the Town of Hillsborough to the County, Bids are being
solicited from land surveyors. The results will be reported at
the January 24, 1983 meeting.
|mpoct: The entire 67-acre landfill tract must be surveyed before the
acquisition of 41.6 acres by the County can be finalized,
Recommendation(s): Award landfill surveying contract to lowest responsible bidder.
• . • 1 •
' • -
OMB Aoprov. al No.29-R0213
I .. NUMBER 3. STATE a-/CUMBER
' FEDERAL ASSISTANCE 2. APPL1-
APPLICA.
I
- cmrs
- , - • nota
4 ... ----
1. TYPE 0 PREAPIt1.1EATHRI • APPU- b. DA= IDENT1. b. DATE rear *Eolith day
OF Year meadh. dair
• FIER
ACTION a APPUCknON CATION
19 ASSIGNED 19
Work ap- 0 fielfiFiLMON OF INTENT (Opt)
Mriciff 0 REPORi OF FEDERAL ACTION Man,*
. . - .
4. LEGAL APPLICANT! ECIPIENT 5. FEDERAL EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO,
ft: Appllang Nana : Orange County Department of Social Services 56-6000327
b. otelnirition Unit •
. . & not available ...
C. Streot/P.O. Sax •
• PRO. e. NUIADER •
GRAM b.71111
d. City : a. rowdy ii
(Prows State "EDS FY1983 Coordi
t. stag •
•
I.ZIP Cedm Federal ated Discretionary Fund4
,
b. Canted Parra (Naas* Calaloo)
Program" Priority 1.5
a & lelephaver No.) ,: • • •
a '7. TITLE AND DESCRIPTION OF APPUCANV3 PROJECT 11.TYPE OF APPLICANT/RECIPIENT
I -
11
• A-Stato
13..lotaratete -Community Action Agency
I-Higher Educational Inatitutlert
Comparing [Iwo Models of Parent EduCation c-sctistat.
Distrkt J-Indian Tribe
K-Otter {Specify):
for Abusinig and Neglecting Families ' D-ccucti
&tit/
____ ______
S . F-Scbool District
G-Special Purr/ate
9.TYPE OF ASSISTANCE 1514----1.1.aPPri:12riate Itige'C:1
A-Seek Giant D-4neuranee
ea ,
•
.. B-Supplernente1 Grant Ether Enter 4:IPPC. En
0 '
C-Loart priote lotter(e)
. '
• •
10. AREA OF PROJECT IMPACT (Names of cilia,caan(ke, 11. ESTIMATED NUM. 12.TYPE OF APPLICATION
Smut.re.) BER OF PERSONS A-gym g,-Reyislo0 E-Augmeriblion
BENEFITING
6.41enesa1 13-Centinuation
•
.•■••• ...1•••■•• rnter*PProPrieto(ate,
0
13. PROPOSED FUNDING 14. CONGRESSIONAL,DISTRICTS ON 15. TYPE OF CHANGE (For lee or:,.10
'-•' A-Inrease Dalian F-Ottar (SpeciAl:
I. FEDERAL 3 I,8.6 557•00 e.APPLICANT- b. PROJECT • 13-0tatasse Dollars
b. APPLICANT I 711171,7.00. 4 '4 C-Inereass Duralicn
D-Dearease DureUon
E-CmcollatIon
. a. STATE .00 16. PROJECT START' 17'. PROJECT
DATE rear mon%dolt DURATION refer appro.
d. LOCAL. . I AO 19 7 g Months 'ebb lattertid =
. e. OTHER I .00 3.8,. ESTIMATED DATE TO " Year month dap 19. MISTING FEDERAL IDENTIFICATION NUM9ER
BE suemirrEo To
$ 1 14869.00 FEDERAL AGENCY•• 19
20. FEDERAL AGENCY TO RECEIVE REQUEST (Name,Gap,SW..ZIP code) 21. REMARKS ADDEO
1 0 Yes 0 No
-,.
22. it. To the b of my knowledge end belief, b. I!required by 01113 Circular A.95.this arAcialoa ten oubm1dcd, purulent to In. No re- ' Rreposoa
at
0
data in 'Oil prztplicatica/opplimuon era structican therein, b stumpage elayrinlrerirs err 411 reapte:sa are *Mar: tweet attached
L.-- THE true and cdrrect. the document has been
L...'-' APPLICANT duly embodied by the gamming body at
CERTIFIES the eppliceoi and the epplicant will comply (1) 0 0.
'3.
THAT). with the rather! =pea= II the Maur- c4 ' 0 0
ante Es elinireverL
i • f31 o o
, m 21 s. TYPED itAME AND TITLE • b. SIGNAT RE 6. RATE SIGHED '
g CERTIFYING Thomas M. Ward, Director / Year manta dap
REPRE.. . •
19 83 1 28
sumnvE °rang Co. Dept. of Soc. SerV. //ifiejaZir r
,. .
24. AGENCY NAME i
1 .
26. APPUCA- Year month dap
710N
RECEIVED 19
,
26. ORGANIZATIONAL UlliT 27. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE 213. FEL/CrAL APPLICATION
•
r I DENTI Fl CATION
i0 • _ . .-----..---- :..
. ADDRESS .
31 FEDERAL GRANT
IDENTIFICATION
..,
31. ACTION TAKEN 3z1 FUNDING .
Year month day 34. Year mon% dap
m
g0 iii.AWARDED a.FEDERAL S .00 33. ACTION DATE).. 19 STARTING DATE 19 .
0 b. REJECTED b.IAPPLICANT ,00 35. CONTACT FOR ikoomotw. INFORMA. 39. Year mots% otep
i -----N, 710N (Name and trephorts manlier) ENDING
i 0 e- RETURNED FOR c. 67ATE AO
____........ DATE 19
t: AMENDMENT d i0cAL .00 37. REMARKS ADDED
a ) -
E 0 4. DEFERRED e OTHER - .00
- ,
......
Os- WITHDRAWN y. Turn $ . ,00 0 yel ONO
16 ..
____.....
. 31 a.Ilit taking above actIco, any=manta revolved horn dearlinabuies were con- b. FEDERAL AGENCY A-O5 OFFICIAL
swum. It same/response Jr due under provision:at Part 1,0141)Circular A-95. Mine and gelcphene no.)
FEDERAL AGENCY It Nan been or le being nuoa.
A-95 ACTION
•
STANDARD FORM 424 PAGE 1 (10-75)
Preacribed bid GX.4,Federal Maaagssosne Cirrator 74-r
..... ... ..,
. _. - . , .... ,. . . . • "'' '' ' - - - - - ' - -
Criteria Index Form
Page
Screening Requirements
•
F. Eligibili y Cover
G. Addressin of HUS priorities Cover •
H. HDS pop tions - Cover
Review Criteria;
A. Innovativeness
State-•of-the-art Page 2, paragraphs 1 & 2
New/Improved Approach Page 2, paragraph 3
B. Prospects for wider impact
Generalizability of results Page 3, paragraph 1
Significance of results Page 3, paragraph 2
Usefulness of results Page 3, paragraph 3, page 7
C. Potential for success
Feasibility of proposed project Pages 4 & 5
Organizational capability Page 9
Staff and funds allocation • Page 8
D. Responsiveness to program announcement
Addressing of priority area Page 1, paragraph 1
BIDS theme re)atedness Page 1, paragraph 1
Targetin on HDS population Page, 1, paragraph 1
Comparing Two Models of Parent EduCation
for Abusing and Neglecting Families
•
Orange County Department of Social Services
300 W. Tryon Street
Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278
Priority 1.5 Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention
Target Population: " Families with preschool children who have
been reported for child abuse or neglect
Total project period: 16 months Amount requested: $86,557.
Authors: Lane Cooke, M.S.W.; Supervisor
Child Protective Services
-Proposed role; Same
George Cole, M.S.W., Supervisor
Child Protective Services
Proposed role; Same
•
„ _
Abstract
The purpose of this demonstration is to evaluate the efficacy and
cost-effectiveness of two models of parent education for families reported
for child abtise or neglect. After obtaining informed consent, the
Child Protecdive Services unit of Orange County (N.Ci), Department of Social
Services wil1 randomly allocate participants to three groups. Two groups
will corresp ad to the two parent education models. The first will add a daycare
training com onent to the standard services which would otherwise be provided.
In addition to regular day care, the child and his parent will come in groups
of 7 or 8 pairs to the daycare center on 10 consecutive Saturday mornings -
where spec/011y trained daycare teachers will, using modeling and role-playing,
provide instruction to parents in parenting skills. The second model also
builds on th package of standard- services including regular day care, but
adds a volunteer parent aide component. 'Volunteers from churches and voluntary
agencies be trained to provide abusing familiei four hours of parent
training a week for 10 weeks. The third grow, will receive all the standard
services plu regular day care but no special parent education component.
The outcomes will be evaluated comparing not only costs but observed changes
in parenting 1skilla and improvement in a pencil and paper parenting knowledge
questionnairz.
•
•
•
•
. .
_... .
1 . 1
” . .
. . ,
. .
4. Project N rrative
1
a. Statement of Need. The purpose of the proposed research,and demonstration
project is to test the impact of two methods of parent education on the parenting
skills and behaviors of abusive and neglectful parents of preschool Children:
That some parental abuse of children is attributable to the lack of knowledge
regarding child development, childrearing,and child management techniques is
. .
supported in the child abuse literature (Helfer and Pollock, 1968; Johnson and
Morse, 1968; Parke and Collmer, 1975; Burgess, 1979). Our agency's experience '
in treatment of abusive parents bears out these findings. In fact, a recent •
review of our caseload revealed approximately 60 cases of confirmed or potential
abuse in which the lack of adequate parenting was a precipitating factor. These
60 cases rep 1 esent fmilies in which all children are preschool age (2-5 years),
' 58% of the mcIthers are between 16 and 25 years and are single parents. These
, - statistics aJ well as our experience in working with these types of families ,
suggest that they could benefit from the proposed program. Moreover, our staff
• has identified parent education as the single greatest service need for abusive
and neglectful families in Orange County. Finally, the Triangle J Council of
Governments, in its Fall 1982 needs assessment, has also ranked parent education
as the first priority service need in Orange County. There are no discrete
parent education services in Orange County.'
The objectives of the proposedproject are as follows: 1) To determine which
of the selec ed models is effective in improving (a) parental knowledge and
skills in ch'ldrearing and child development and (b) parental behavior toward
the child; ) To determine which model has a greater effect on reduCing abuse
, .
reports or r _eatedoccurrences of abuse among project parents; 3) To determine
the relative cost-effectiveness of :the two selected methods compared with
' daycare alon .
, .
Parent e ucation has been .shown to influence parental attitudes and
' . . . .
. ,
......_
, .
-2-
behavior toward the child (Tracy, et al., 1975), Teaching parent-child interaction
kthrough mode ing, coaching, encouraging, and explaining has been shown to
enhance 4 parent's ability to respond more appropriately to the child (Robeson
- 1
et al. , 1979; Denicola and Sandier, 1980), Another study reports that parenting
education is effective, particularly if it is individualized and focuses on
the parent-opild system (Reid at al„ 1980) . Three studies (Sandler at al. , 1978;
. . .
Wolfe and Slidler, 1978; and Sandler at al. , 1978) suggest that parent education
is successful in improving the abusive parent's child management skills, contrbl
•
of anger, and generalized problem solving. .
1 ••
More dramaticAvidence of the success of parenting education is available
from a recent study (Wolfe, et al. , 1981). Parents who had been specifically
trained to handle difficult child management situations and to control their
anger and aggression reported fewer child related problems in the home,
1
demonstrated the continued use of child management techniques, and were viewed .
by' their ca eworkers as functioning more effectively. Similar improvements
were not fold d in the control group which had been receiving bi-weekly supervision
I .
I
in the home in accordance with standard services provided by the state, Further
support for the success of treatment program'was provided by the one-year
follow-up of each family.
AlthOu h the literature relating to parent education is generally supportive
of the effectiveness and success of such programs, the majority of the studies
are unsystematic, inferential, and highly speculative. Furthermore, the few
systematic tudies that are available need replication specifically in the
case of the abusive parent. Whereas the studies referred to above suggest the
usefulness if parent education programs in the prevention and treatment of child
abuse and neglect, no stndies randomly allocate abusive parents to different
parent education programs and none examine the relative cost-effectiveness
of such ,proirans, . • . .
. . .
-3-
b. Benefits and Results. It is expected that the results of this research
would generate new insights for rational program development with a view toward
the prevention of child abuse. For example, results indicating that parenting
skills improve with the use of the parent education model of volunteer role
modeling in he home suggest that such a model could be incorporated into the
existing array of preventive services.
Additionally, evidence of this model's cost-effectiveness would probably
increase the likelihood of its addition to the treatment and prevention service
plans of our Protective Service Unit. Like many local governmental units,
Orange County is experiencing a scarcity of financial resources for new health.
and welfare Programs. While aounty officials are concerned with families in
•
distress, they•are seeking ways of effectively meeting these families' needs
with limited resources. Additionally, they are attempting to target these
limited resources to those who are in greatest need and who will benefit the
•
most.
• It is expected that this proposed research and demonstration project will
benefit Orange County's efforts to prevent and treat child maltreatment. If
this research demonstrates that a selected model or models of parent education
areboth successful in improving parenting skills as well as cost-effective,
then this information can be used to encourage officials and the public to "
financially support the development of these programs for the families in
greatest nee . Furthermore, the impact of the parent education program can be
magnified by offering it to families at risk of abuse and neglect before an
incident tak.s place.
• .
•
. .
-4- ,
, . .
c. Pro'ect Desi:n. The proposed project design requires that approximately
I
60 parents of preschool and kindergarten children in families mandated to receive
services ironl our agency be randomly assigned to one of three conditions: two
1
treatment models and one control group. All abused or neglected children of
1
all families will receive the standard services to which they would be entitled
in the absence of this research, including daycare. The parents will receive
either no pa ent education or the type of parent education prescribed for
the model to which she/he is randomly assigned. The families will form four.
' cohorts during the course of a year of data collection. Each cohort will
participate in the project for 10 weeks. All parents eligible for participation
. .
will have the,project thoroughly explained. No services which would be available
in the absenie of the project will be withheld, and no penalties, expressed
• 1
or implied, 11 result from a parent's declining to particiPate. All
participants ill sign an informed consent, permitting them to withdraw at any ,
time. .
• The two experimental models of parent education are known as: (1) daycare
component ^7 role-modeling by a parent volunteer; (2) daycare component --
role-modelin: by daycare staff member.
Prior t. beginning parent education the following data will be collected
by the casew.rker assigned to the case: socio-demographic information,
nature of abuse and neglect, types of problems in the household (Stress Index
and Quality f Life Inventory Form) and client's functioning (Berkeley Planning
Associates C. lent Functioning Form). In addition, the caseworker will record
monthly the s rvices parents received while in the project (Berkeley Planning
Assodiates Inventory of Services Received by Client).
Other data to be 'collected on the parent prior to beginning the pioject
include: assessment of parent's knowledge of child development (Stedman and
Reramer's'Inventoryof Knowledge,of Social and Emotional Development);
, -
. . .
. .
-5-
. , . .
observation of parental behavior toward the child in the home (Parent/Child
Interaction Form); and parental report of child behavior problems (Eyeberg
Child Behavilr Inventory). These data will be collected by one of the two
part-time in ervieVers hired for this project,
, 7
The daycare center-based parent education will be administered at the
daycare center by three trainers recruited from the daycare center staff. This
modeling componenet will, be provided on Saturday mornings (8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.)
with the children and parents at the daycare center. The center, in a
county-owned building, has indicated in writing its-willingness to participate
in the project. Transportation to and from the center and lunch will be
provided. The modeling component will, focus on reinforcing appropriate parenting
Iby demonstration or role-playing, The modeling of new behavior by daycare
workers, trifled by project staff and hired consultants, clarifies the steps
involved in managing the child's behavior and allows parents to observe the .
effects of the new skill in a real-life situation.
The didactic parent education-volunteer group will have the parent education
instruction and role-modeling perforMed by volunteer parent aides. These
volunteers will be recruited from churches and volunteer groups and organizations
located in thl communities of the parent enrolled in the research and
demonstration project. These-volunteers will be selected from among mature
individuals wfth a reputation as "successful" parents. In addition, they must
demonstrate to the project staff that they are caring, sensitive, and accepting.
These volunteers will be trained by project staff and consultants and will
meet periodically with staff to discuss techniques, problems and procedures.
Parent aides ill be expected to spend four hours a week with their clients and
to document t ,eir hours in 4 diary.
At the c mpletion_of ten weeks, data will be collected on the parents
assigned to t e three conditions. Specifically, the caseworker assigned to the
. . .
. .
' ' 4 -6- •
• '
case will collect data on client functioning (Berkeley Client Functioning Form)
and stress ( tress Index and Quality of Life), In addition, the interviewer
will go to the parent's home to collect the following data: •assessment of
parent's knoLedge of child development (Stedman and Remmer Inventory of
I
Knowledge of Social and Emotional Development); parental behavior in the home
(ParentfChilA Interaction Form); and parental report of child's behavior
, .
(Eyeberg Inv?ntory). Agency reports will be examined to determine•whether any
of these patents were reported and confirmed for reports of repeated abuse or •
1
negledt. .
The cos.-effectiveness analysis will be performed by calculating the costs
and'effects of each method using Shepard and Thompson (1979) model of economic
1.
analysis, that is, what is being accomplished for a set amount of money. The
financial da a: needed for this analysis will be obtained from the agency records.
i
. .
.
Analysis of variance will be used to examine the efficacy of the specific
parent education models for producing changes in the participants on the
identified v riables. After examining the within and between groups deficiencies
. to determine whether there are random or systematic differences between the
means of sal cted measures, a set of analyses will, be conducted to determine the
extent of dilferential change between the pre-test and post-test measures.
' 1
Evidence of pre-test equivalence, and differential change scores between groups
1
on the post-test measures, would indicate that these changes attributed to
treatment. The last four months of the 16 month project period will be devoted
. 1
to data analysis and the preparation of the final report and plans for
dissemination of the results.
. . 1
. i
. .
. .
. . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
, •
. . . -
1 ' .
. ,
, .
. . .
. '
, I
.._,. . .
-7- . •
f P
d. Utilzation and Dissemination, The University faculty under contract
to this project will have several opportunities to disseminate the results of
the research] Their services have already been utilized extensively across
the state by the state chapter of the NCCAN for workshops and this mechanism
7
will again be available to train child protective service workers, to apply
techniques developed by he project. Secondly, the 6culty will incorporate the
results of the project into their full-time teaching and continuing education
activities. inally, the faculty will make the results of the project known to;
- . instructors filiated with the Child Welfare Institute, a training resource for
supervisory and administrative personnel in the child welfare field.
. ,
The resu ts.oE this research will also be disseminated by the State Division
of Social Seririces. In fact, the Division intends to publish and distribute the
1
results of the project to the other ninety-nine counties in he state. Additionally,
1 .
the project staff and the Division supervisors will be available for participation •
1 .
-at'state and local conferences, institutes, and workshops. Some examples of
these workshops, institutes and conferences at which the above personnel will
I •
I
disseminate information of the projects are: 1) the North Carolina Social
Service institute, the UNC-School of Social Wotk's Annual Conference and the
1
Annual Conference for daycare center administrators and staff. Finally, the
project and the Division of Social Services supervisors will incorporate the
results of this research in their lectures presented to students enrolled in
the School of Social Work. . .
. ,
, .
. .
. ,
, .
. .
' . . . •
. .
. . .
. .
usillimili■—' _ • _ _ _
-8-
e. Level of Effort. The personnel directly responsible for this project are
the project director, 100% of whose time will be devoted to this project, and 5Z
of the time of each of four Social Service employees, the two Child Protection
Supervisors, the Day Care Supervisor, and the Day Care Coordinator. In addition,
two graduate assistances will each work two days a week for 9 months on the project, r
and 1200 hours of volunteer parent aide time will be contributed at $6.30 per hour.
The total salary and fringe benefit costs for the 16 months of the projet,
including the value of the contributed time, are therefore $53,121, of which $31,561
will be‘required from Federal Funds.
Contractual items will total $44,860. This includes the cost of 40% of the time
of one full time equivalent faculty researcher from the Department of.Maternal and
Child Health, Oniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. This responsibility
will be divided between Drs. Kotch and Howze. The Department will contribute 25%
of this faculty time. Also included is a half-time research assistant who will
cost $9,321,. sr the total salary and fringe benefit cost will be.$29,408, of which
$24,386 will be paid for.by Federal funds. Other costs include the cost of
copying, computer time, key punching, faculty travel, and employing two
Interviewers on an hourly basis to observe parenting in the home before and after
intervention. The total cost of the evaluation effort Is therefore $38,980, of
which the Federal share is $33,886. The other contractual items include a lump
sum payment of $2,880 for the day care trainers time on Saturday mornings and
$3,000 for the professional training of the parent volunteers and the day care trainers
Transportttion will, cost $4,000 , of yhich .$3,000 is for transportation of
parents and children to and from the day care center on Saturday mornings. Lunch
will cost a total of $1,200: The fair market value of the use of the county
building for the Saturday .motning day care training is $1,630. for the 160 hours
of total use. The total cost of the project for 16 months is therefore $104,811,
of which the Federal share is $76,599 (73%). The indirect cost (13%) of this
• share makes thetotal Federal 'contribution $86,557.
-9-
5. Organizational Capability, Orange County, the area to be served by this .
project, is located in the Piedmont section of North Carolina, .It has a
population of 69,398 (1979 estimate) of which 45% is rural. • Fifty percent
of the count4's population lives in Chapel Hill Township, which is more
..:
affluent than predominantly rural northern Orange County.
The Orange County Department of Social Services -is based in the County
seat of Hill borough, North Carolina, with a satellite office in Carrboro,
North Carolina, adjacent to Chapel Hill. It employs sixty-five (85) individuals,
. , including two Child Protective Services Supervisor,. a day care supervisor and .
a daycare co rdinator. The agency provides a combination of social Work
services. The project will be located within the Social. Work Division Of the
agency, specifically within the Child Protective Servides :and Day Care Units.
The Project 1 irector, graduate assistants, and the project 'secretary will be
located in t e Child Protective Services Unit and supervised by the Child ,
Protective Services Supervisors. The Day Care Unit will supervise and coordinate
the day care component. The two Child Protective Services Supervisors each
have an M.S,W. degree with specialization in administration, planning and
management. They have extensive direct Protective Services experience and .
each has over three years supervisory experience. The Day Care Supervisor
has nine years experience supervising day tare services in Orange County.
The eve 31 uation component of the .project will be undertaken by researchers
in the Department of Maternal and Child Health (DMCH) of the School of Public
Health, UnivJrsity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. DMCH has been aleader in
public health research of importance to mothers and children. Among these
research projects have been many related to child abuse and neglect. For
example, the r, spital, and Home Support for Maternal Attachment Project looked
at ways to improve maternal attachment as a means of decreasing the frequency
1
of poor,health outcomes, including child maltreatment. This research, has recently
. ,
. . .
. .
. .
.. • , -10- . .
e '
been extended to a Longitudinal Intervention Study of High Risk Infants.
Again, the incidence of child maltreatment is an important outcome under study.
The two faculty members supervising the research component of the project
are Dorothy F. Howze, M.S.W., Dr.P,H„ and Jonathan B, Kotch, M.D. M.P.H.,
both Assistant Professors in DMCH. Dr. Howze was a practicing social worker
I
prior to mat. culating in the doctoral program at the Harvard School of Public
Health, where she was employed ,as a consultant to Dr.Bli Newberger's Family
Development tudy. Her research focused on the quality of case management
and its relationship to reincidence of child maltreatment. This research
was an outgrowth of her involftment in the Berkeley Planning Association's
Evaluation of the Eleven Child Abuse and Neglect Demonstration Projects.
1 -
Dr. Rot I h is a pediatrician who, as a master's candidate in the University
of North Car lina School of Public Health, led a team of students which
developed a plan for the prevention of child maltreatment which was adopted . .
by a county interagency child abuse prevention committee and funded by the
United Way. His analysis of family and'employment diaracteristics which affect
the confirma ion of reported cases Of abuse and neglect was selected for
presentation at the 1982 annual meeting of the American Public Health Association.
He and Dr. Howze were selected by the North Carolina Chapter of the National
Committee for Child Abuse and Neglect to present workshops across the state'
on therole of stress in the etiology -of child abuse.
. ,
- .
. . .
. .
. ,
^ t:
ORANGE COUNTY
aOARDmr Action Agenda
^//
Ataiom acFmoA ITEM ABSTRACT Item - ]
DEFYING DATE January 24, 1983
Subject: Driver's License Examiner's Office - Orange
1oe[artneot; County Manager | zublic Hearing: yes X no |
Information Contact:
No County Manager's Office
Phone Number: 732-8181 ext. 501
PURPOSE: To consider an alternative space arrangement and agreement to house the office.
NEED: In June of 1982, plans received Board approval for several agencies, including
the Driver's License Office, to occupy the Old Police Building once the Central
Communication's Center was relocated to its own facility. Two developments
during the intervening period have had a bearing on the plans. First, the
lease for Driver's License and the Department on Aging at its present location
had to be extended to February 15, 1983' Secondly, Mr. Neil R. Shelton of the
0CDOT found the Old Police Building to be unsuitable for conducting driver
examinations because of the volume of traffic on Columbia and Rosemary Streets
and insufficient parking spaces in adjacent lot. This caused a search to be
mounted for a different permanent site than the Old Police Building or con-
tinued lease at the present site'
The Town of Carrboro offered space which could be rented in the Town Hall
basement. Inspection revealed that space could be suitable if the open space
were partitioned and equipped for office occupancy.
zsDuCr; Cost for improvements would be approximately $5.100 in material and SJ'OOg in
County in-kind labor. Carrboro would provide 800 souare feet, rent, utilities
and custodial service as a credit fo�,2,7 years rent for the improvements made.
This would be equivalent to 53.75 per square foot fo��the period compared to :
S7.50 per square foot under present leasing. The dvinicover the period would
be $23,900.
Funds are available under-the equipment and repair account of Public Works so
no new appropriation would be necessary.
A lease with Carrboro specifying the rent credit would be presented at the
February 7 Board Meeting.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
Authorize Manager to initiate the renovation and to negotiate the lease
according to the above terms with formal lease approval at a subsequent
meeting of the Board.
.7.• . ''1.1." ' '-"4144-71' 0 ,..,: -,:' . ' ' - , ... -1. .—.,--.•:-...--;i_.4,....7.,:,_3---.:4144:i-,--,,-,:-;:.--:,-,.--„:4,717.f-:,,,--;;.;, .:::., „,
, --
ORANGE couN.-47
BOAR') a? ca-NissioNts
Action Agenda
Item
ACTION ;LEND.; ITS! ABSTRACT
MEETZ-G DATE,' ,.....„_.....,....._anuary 24, 1983
Subject: Latimer Street SR 1162
. _
r Departre.,,, rit; Planning . , i Public Hearing:. _yes X no 1
. .
.• _____
Attachment Cs) : Information Contact: Susan Smith
Petition
phorw Number: 732-8181 EXT. 359
PURPOSE: To consider the concerns of residents of Latimer Street and Kingsboro Estates
regarding the paving of two-tenths of a mile of Latimer Street.
The unpaved portion of Latimer Street connects two paved sections of Latimer .
Street. The unpaved portion is fairly steep and in poor condition for travel.
NEED: Latimer Steet extends from inside the corporate limits of Hillsborough to
Kingsboro Estates subdivision within the extra-territorial limits of Hillsborough.
The developer of Kingsboro Estates subdivision paved the streets within the
subdivision, including a portion of Latimer Street which serves the subdivision.
The Town of Hillsborough contracted with DOT to pave the one-tenth portion of
Latimer Steet which extends to the corporate limits after many requests from
residents served by the road. The Town encumbered funds from Powell Bill monies
to pay forthis work. However, the General Statutes restrict the use of these
funds outsalde of municipal corporate limits. Therefore, the Town could not use the
funds to Ove the remaining length of road within the Town's extra territorial
area extending to the paved portion within Kingsboro Estates subdivision.
I
The residents of Latimer Street and Kingsboro Estates presented the attached
petition the Town of Hillsborough at the Town Board's December 13, 1982
meeting re uesting the Town to pave the unpaved portion of Latimer Street. The
Town considered the item but referred the residents to the County for action.
The Town allso sent a letter to DOT endorsing the request for paving. DOT indicated
in a lette dated December 21, 1982 that the road was eligible for paving through
either the Participatory Paving Program (RRR) or Property Owners Participation
:IP
Program (P .).
DOT maintains the entire length of Latimer Street including the unpaved two-tenths
of a mile Outside the Town's corporate limits. DOT has indicated that Latimer
Street is considered to be a residential and subdivision street and, therefore,
the unpavel section is only eligible for paving under either the Participatory
Paving Pro ram (P.P.P.) or the Property Owners Participatory Program (Po ). DOT
estimates he cost to grade, drain and pave one mile of road is $120,000. The
approximate cost Co pave the two-tenths of a mile section of Latimer Street
would be $24, ,000. Under either the RPP, or PAP, program, the local share would be
;
$4.00 per linear foot or $4,224.00. The local share may be paid by the residents
of Latimer Street adjacent to the unpaved portion of road; by the residents
of KingsborlpEstates; or by the County. Payment by the residents adjacent to the
•
4 •
' -
IMPACT: Paving of the unpaved portion of the road would substantially improve the
access for all residents served by the road, as well as those residents of
Kingsboro Estates who use the road for access to the subdivision.
RECOMMENDATION: The following options are available for consideration by the Board;
a) participation by the residents adjacent to the unpaved portion in
the P.P.P. or P.O.P. programs; b) participation by the residents
of Kinigsboro Estates in the P.O.P. program; c) participation by
the County in the P.O.P. program; d) request DOT to reclassify the
road for paving under a non-participatory program.
As the Board decides.
. .. -----
- ---------
•" -.. "......"-- ---....mr-.. ././— mi..... ■ommoss...•••••rna-- . -... • ^,.. --....iwa.•warm.■INIIN,
f 1
WE THE UNDERSI NED RESIDENTS AND NEIGHBORS OF LATIMER ROAD DO PETITION THE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA TO PAVE THE 0.2 MILE (2 TENTHS MILE) SECTION OF THIS
ROAD WHICH HAS NOT BEEN PAVED. AS SHOWN BELOW, THE TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH
PAVED TO THE TOWN LIMITS AND THE HOUSING AUTHORITY PAVED THEIR PORTION. THE
SE(TION BETWEEN WAS NOT, AND HAS NOT BEEN, COMPLETED.
A (,:
4--id, -I 'illft1
o 41 ....._t_i____
/ ,
0.2 mile unpaved ii1)
irig/144L-1-
1,,- _ .„.....- •
NAME ADDRESS
i --
4--
£2 '.... - A -
i - ei- _ -A-dad. 1-4 e-rif hilif/
,19 46144J Caatiti A.;41,01 is--07,12 e4:214:74ev —
r ,
A. .1
4......_c--
-- i
21/-"e liriza-Le) 16-: _ •41: a
/. iii A
47/ ffirr
ki • _ — atth.
:44111±-1; • ...mpoliV41:1 9..4...11 i ii AFL _ lc...er - -
INIMWAMI*11., d
I A
11‘41N-t (--;-,,Itt2, ' A() 'D-
,gr',
"_. Atli A"...^) A4 4
1.116)101"-N7
---__
- IIIIMINIM-•-. .. gltihh.NP"lr.:. "f alk
dnr 71' 41 ' *0 • .. ! • °C .
/:1/12"4"t"-.4/ ' ..--,t .-':, , -.•-. •. ,.., •
- : Jr, , P --_.•'_.
, , _ _ . .. • 49 I, / 40,
7149444ove) S;71e...s. P.712
if' '/.
. ..
, ., • - /...,...... .. .,Ar-.4 .. • .4. _- dir 4
/\' M......,.....,...
— _
A,
, .1:i.,• ' - ft/1 r aia __ _ 2P . 4' .. . • ? 3A7/ -
„-.
1 A / '■- ,1 :, 4og,
. -
(2---1 e - . -? A:7
—
A . ). 4' • _ l ' . 4 '"1
- v - 1_____---------
-
151"e'"Z•n"14"--tAd b r ...r, -Y/,- '... e .,,i 'CC' C WI ,
....-
1t'I e . otil iiii..` ane i _.; :4. A.,..64p--„,-.1) e:•. --,,,,±
)
IV . , \. , 4____ , ..
.e-C. .
, A. - 2_, • • 111_ . , i ,I, , !
i2j-d 13■ ft. 3;)7//)' ' AAP i-cr tell I k..).c__•
_ . ....
'.6
/;:( (-4,-1,1,e./ e ., _■(-01 4)1 _7 A ict.---/ 7-7 r") — V/ _
. ---,-
WE THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS AND NEIGHBORS OF LATIMER ROAD DO PETITION THE
i
'..STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA TO PAVE THE 0.2 MILE (2 TENTHS MILE) SECTION OF THIS
ROAD WHICH HAS NOT BEEN PAVED. AS SHOWN BELOW, THE TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH
PAVED TO THE TOWN LIMITS AND THE HOUSING AUTHORITY PAVED THEIR PORTION, THE
SECTION BETWAEL WAg.NOT. AND.HAS NOT BEEN, COMPLETED.- --- - ---- - - -. . - - - - ----
-
0.2 mile unpaved
NAME ADDRESS
,
Yr_41.41, 444
. 4 - *) .; 27- 7 .
fMI )
-.Yi-L-4 -24 - 7-F- M.-.,,,,4
_ _ _ „......!
17/1-1 -49:i'lc----e's .z ---- 4 /r4/2._ Ar)(1?5- .3 7 7-7/-- ,/z
-.
. ,./ ,...
• .4Ie .4r...j, ,.
.15212 8,? - - ,' - /
7 1
1-5 iilied5-leA7/Dti
-if • z
1 • I . o' .r. • .•• • A.-72-' r ANINL #19 AV Lt., 4 • ie.
/ r • ...,..
/
# , --- -zi----4 - ''''
c
A
__ "‘ • A :
__
^ Or
141 r■ ' AA; .. .i ., ., - ? , ,/,.. . •..„ ._>/:r4-,• - - ---
_
// // / / / / / /
_
..ig......._ , , A4/ I 1 6.• : -... - -I'
:10.444... . .
_ . • .. L.
' ./ • r
tijah et/604,j, • :g - a
, • • ,(..‘,
.._...,L.,. .
i 1) li' 1 1 . -2 9'
_ _ ,,_ , ...../4 _4.,
• . . , de - _,-.
-.' ,i,,,.. i j„,„ ,_,.. 1 •
) , t_g_.
,„..i. ,,._... .„)._ _____ _
2,, <:,i(1.
_ _ I _ _
•
. - Cr"? el. _ 44_1 - . 33 61
Ade 24.00 ..d........■-f•
•••••• . • -o 4 -.
•1,p,1112/0`et.., D it:CA.7 , 11P-tie,..■ 4 a. .' l 8
J. . _.—. . .0•—..,.I.- .iii , 41' ..,- 7— I : • a• • ,
', 0 .. vzIal -: 11IL Ilitif4V 11:116 I 14 jut , _
0 "
—______,
------ —
--- *
. _
' WE THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS AND NEIGHBORS OF LATIMER ROAD DO PETITION THE
'� STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA TO PAVE THE 0.2 MILE (2 TENTHS MILE) SECTION OF THIS
ROAD WHICH HAS NOT BEEN PAVED. AS SHOWN BELOW, THE TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH
PAVED TO THE TPWN LIMITS AND THE HOUSING AUTHORITY PAVED THEIR PORTION. THE
SECTION B' " WAS NOT, AND HAS NOT BEEN COMrLETED.
0.2 mile unpaved
NAME, ADDRESS
. )
C A
J mgrp
_ - --_ l ' 111 a ��►!l/ ,r
l •
I � . _ � �. • �-
e .:� �. . _ .tom a• w
1211"it: * r •
• 1115 • 77.C-
i ti
1 . �ia,3 5 I.iji
l
Pima . - 5 4. 471' 6; ! E N.
�i .I rid. 4 .�%r .37 1► �� j//erd •
•