Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 12-14-1982 ' . - 1LA �� \ ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, DECEMBER 14, 1982 7:30 P.M. I COMMISSIONERS' ROOM ORANGE COUNT/ COURTHOUSE HILLSBOROUGHi NORTH CAROLINA A. BOARD COMMENTS B. AUDIENCECOMMENTS 1. Matt rs on the printed agenda 2. Matters not on the printed agenda C. PUBLIC HEARING--MACE ROAD AND DUMONT DRIVE RESOLUTIONS—PARTICIPATORY PAVING PROGRAM D. BOARD DECISIONS I. mac 2. on -. 4. Tax Releases/ 5. Requdst for Public Hearing Committee Appointment 6. ^ 7. CBA Supplemental Funds 8. — 9. ���r���—_ l8. Sheriff Hiring ll. Subdivision Moratorium 12' Econcmic Development Organization ls. Budgdt Amendments N� | • . ' — — .,. • an•• . ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Room Na 12 • 106 EAST MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGH, N. C. 27278 'RICHARD E.EMITTED,Owl... NORMAN CLISTAvESON E MARSHALL NORMAN WALKER DON Lu-tort NOTICE The OrangelCounty Board of Commissioners has rescheduled its regular 3rd Tuesday meeting in December from the 21st to December 14th. The regular 4th Monday meeting in December, the 2/th, has been cancelled. A normal meeting schedule will be resumed in January. 0 ��'1 MINUTES DECEMBER 14, 1982 The Orange County Board of Commissioners met in regular session on Tuesday, . December 14, 1982' at 7:30 P.M. in the Commissioners' Room, Orange County Court- . house, Hillsborough, North Carolina. Commissioners present: Chairman Richard E. Whitted, and Commissioners Ben Lloyd, Shirley E. Marshall, Norman Walker and Don Villhoit. ` Commissioner Whitted said that in order to accommodate all those present " for Agenda Item D-3, Resolution of Congratulations, the Board would consider that . . first. " D-3 RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS . Commissioner Walker moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, to adopt . the Resolution of Congratulations for the Orange County Family Supermarket Wild- . cats upon the team's winning the North Carolina State Midget Football Championship " for 1982, Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, 0. • Commissioner Whitted read the Resolution for the audience and presented the . framed Resolution to Assistant Coach Larry Knight in the absence of Coach Joe . Cates. Members of the Wildcats were given a copy of the Resolution; coaches and . Wildcats were congratulated by Commissioner Whitted for their accomplishment. ~ A. BOARD COMMENTS , Commissioner Whitted added four items for consideration: Obie property update, ~ Big Oak Drive to the State Secondary Road system, Northside bid award, and Northern " Orange Youth Council Resolution; he also added an announcement. . Commissioner wfllhoit said that the Golden Age Circle Club was having its o annual Christmas luncheon on Friday. December 17th at noon in the Northside Mniti- . purpose Center and the Commissioners were invited. , B. AUDIENCE COMMENTS • Ms. Lane Cook said she was present for the consideration of CBA funding; there , were no others in the audience who wished to speak. " C. PUBLIC HEARING--MACE ROAD AND DUMONT DRIVE PARTICIPATORY PAVING-- PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION ° Ms. Susan Smith, Planning Department, said that forty-seven of forty-nine property owners along Mace Road (SR 1384) had signed the petition for Participatory � Paving; she added that assessment was on a per lot basis and that all owners agreed /" (]02 , with the Preliminary Assessment Resolution, , Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd, to adopt the , Final Assessment Resolution, accept the Certificate of Mailing offered by the . Clerk, and to set the Public Hearing on the Preliminary Assessment Roll for January , 18, 1983, at 7:30 P.N. for the Mace Road (SR 1384) Participatory Paving Project, . Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, O. . Ms. Smith told the Board that the assessment for Dumont Drive (SR 1595) , was on a road frontage basis and the property owners agreed with that. ^ Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall , to adopt the . Final Assessment Resolution, accept the Certificate of Mailing offered by the . Clerk, and to set the Public Hearing on the Preliminary Assessment Roll for January " 18, 1983` at 7:30 P.M. for the Dumont Drive (SR 1595) Participatory Paving Project. . Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, O. ° D-4 TAX REFUND/RELEASE REQUESTS ^ Both these requests were tabled on December 6th to this date. Mr. Kermit Lloyd, Tax Supervisor, told the Board that both Mr. Cecil N. Riley and Brujest, Inc., had been notified of this meeting by both his office and , the Clerk to the Board, .• Mr. Cecil W. Riley was not present for this meeting. Mr. Lloyd summarized |, the request, saying, that Mr. Riley had sent in an agricultural use classification • request for 1982 which had been granted; however, Mr. Riley also said that he 4 had submitted a use classification for 198I and requested such a classification ,. valuation for the tract of land for 1981, Mr. Lloyd said the tax office had not received such a use classification request for 1981 for Mr. Riley's tract of land and had it done so a reapplication for 1982 would not have been necessary. Mr. Lloyd recommends denial of this request based on his finding that a timely submittal had not been received in the tax office for 198I., Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall , to approve the Tax Supervisor's recommendation, i.e. to deny the request for agricultural use classification valuation for the tract of land owned by Mr. Cecil W. Riley for - 1981' Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, V. Mr. Lloyd summarized the tax release request of Br,jret, rr.c', saying that Mr. Berkowitz (President of the n"77.0%) ;lad purchased Baskin-Robbins Ice Cream - Store in nto ond p.o' 4::cd an estimated tax for that year; later the accountant o 0O� • had sent in the tax listing using the full purchase price as volue. Mr. Berkowitz, ° who was present, said that he had originally listed the full purchase price for ▪ tax purposes based on information he had received from a clerk in the tax office. , He said that approximately $30,000 of the purchase price was good will. Mr. Lloyd ▪ said he had visited the site and agreed with Mr. Berkowitz that the equipment is , not worth the amount on the tax books; he added that the equipment is about ten , years old. Mr. Berkowitz said that good will is not taxable as he had erroneously ^ understood the tax clerk t ^ say. , The County Attorney told the Board it could release or refund taxes on two , bases: 1) clerical error; or, 2) illegal tax. It was his opinion that this case , falls into the latter category, that of illegal tax, there being no legal basis ^ to tax beyond market value. ^ Commissioner Lloyd moved, seconded by Commissioner Walker, to grant the o tax release request for 1980-81 reducing the business personalty for Brujest, Inc., , by $31,238.00 and $30,544'00, respectively, because the additional tax was beyond , market value and,therefore, an illegal tax. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, O. • 0-5 PUBLIC HEARING REQUESTS • Mr, Marvin Collins, Planning Director, told the Board that the developer of , The Timbers had missed the submittal deadline for the November Joint Public Hearing , by only two or three days and was requesting a special joint public hearing for , January 24, 1983, rather than waiting until the regularly scheduled February, 1983, Public Hearing. The Board noted that the NACo Legislative Conference would be , held the last week in February and consequently that Public Hearing might have to , be rescheduled. Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Walker, to have a joint , public hearing with the Planning Board on January 24, 1983, for The Timbers, Mr. . Freeland and any others who make a timely request for inclusion. Vote: Ayes, . 5; noes, V. 0-6 TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE Ms. Smith told the Board that under Federal law, Transportation Advisory . Committees must be composed of elected officials and that, as the result of the . latest census, Chapel Hill-Carrboro and two other portions of Orange County were . included in the Durham urbanized area. The Commissioners need to appoint one of ` their members to serve on the Durham Area Transportation Advisory Committee 004 t^ L. organizational purposes. Ms. Smith said the Memorandum of Understanding among 1. parties would need to be updated and revised to reflect the new composition of ,. the Committee. Commissioner Wfllholt moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, to appoint 1^ Richard E. Whitted to serve on the Durham Area Transportation Advisory Committee /, as Orange County's representative. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, D. /. 0-7 CBA3UPPLBNENTAL FUNDING Ms. Lane Cooke, Chair of the Youth Services Needs Task Force, told the Board !^ that the Task Force had sent out a survey to ascertain needs of adolescents in the County. Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, to approve the recommendation of the Youth Services Needs Task Force, allocating the following amounts in supplemental funds to: 3 Sheaffer House $2,170 Maintenance, repairs, security deposits , Janus House 1,282 Liaison worker and business space r. Tree House 1,777 Weekend counsellor and maintenance Phillips Project 553 Training component 3, $6,782 /, Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, V' }" n-8 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT--SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT The Manager summarized the Sheriff's request to purchase four used Highway no� 2^ Patrol Cars for use in the Sheriff's Department (see pagesu��1~ /�/^ of this Book 3• for details). Commissioner Walker moved, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd, to 4-" approve the purchase as requested. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, O. -5" D-g ABC ENFORCEMENT CONTRACT S. Commissioner Walker moved, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to approve the 7, contract for ABC Law enforcement between the County, Sheriff and ABC Board. Vote: 3. Ayes, 5; noes, O. 9^ D-lV SHERIFF'S HIRING REQUEST )" The Sheriff has requested the hiring of an`individual as a deputy who is the this h l^ son of a matron presently employed with the County (see page of � on k for Z^ details). Commissioner Nillhoit noting that direct supervision of either by the 3" other would not occur, moved to approve the Sheriff's request; Commissioner Marshall seconded the motion. During the ensuing discussion, the County Attorney said it 5^ is his opinion that GS I53A-103 does not apply to this particular case, since 6" neither of the principals ic a -:iadve of the Sheriff; additionally, the Sheriff ,-as not yet opted into the County's Personnel Policy and therefore Article VIII 8" 9. 0" A c Section 8 does not apply to the Sheriff's Department either. Sheriff Pendergrass said that he wanted to conform to the County's Personnel Policy in all cases so that if he did opt into it he would not have a problem. Commissioner Willhoit said tl in view of the Attorney's remarks as long as "there is not direct or indirect supervision it /the hi r i ng requested/ wou ld b e consistent with' the County Personnel Policy whereupon Commissioner Willhoit withdrew his motion to approve the request. Commissioner Whitted told the Sheriff he could take whatever action he deemed appropriate with regard to this matter. D-ll SUBDIVISION MORATORIUM Commissioner Willhoit said that Planning Staff was uncertain as to whether or not the Board had ever lifted its moratorium on major subdivisions in the watersheds; he added that such action, he believed, was implicit in the action the Board took on July 6, 1982, on the Water Resources Task Force Recommendations. Commissioner Willhoit moved to clarify that the moratorium on major subdivisions in the University Lake and Upper Eno Watersheds was ended; Commissioner Marshall seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, V. D-l2 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION The County Manager reviewed the steps the County and Towns Staffs had taken to reach a synthesis of views for the proposed Economic Development Commission. . The Manager noted some changes in the proposed Resolution; he noted that this was an initial start up budget. Commissioner Marshall emphasized that this proposed initial budget in "no way shows expectation for the future" and that there was . "no expectation for limiting it" to the amounts shown here. The Manager said that the Commission would present its budget each year and then the County would ask for funding from the participating entities on these proportions. Mr. Watts Hill , Jr., from the Chapel Hill-Carrboro Chamber of Commerce, said that while the Chamber as a body had not approved this Resolution, he certainly did. Mr. Hill commended the Managers of Chapel Hill, Carrboro and the County for the good work they had accomplished. Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd, to adopt the Resolution Creating the Orange County Economic Development Commission as presented and with the changes indicated by the Manager. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, O. Commissioner Marshall complimented the Manager on a nice piece of work, D-14 OBIE PROPERTY UPDATE 006 The County Attorney told the Board he had received an offer to purchase • the Annie Riley Obie house from Mr. John Seelye on December 9th in accordance • with the Board's instructions of December 6th (see the Minutes of that meeting • for details). Commissioner Whitted read the Resolution accepting Mr. Seelye's • offer subject to conditions listed (See pages 6Dv:4gof this book for the ▪ Resolution and offer to purchase). Commissioner Marshall moved to adopt the • Resolution accepting Mr. Seelye's offer to purchase the Obie property; Cnm- , misxioner Willhoit seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, O. O-13 BUDGET AMENDMENTS Commissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Whitted, to approve ▪ the budget amendments (please see pages:344410. this book). Vote: Ayes, 5; , noes, O. ^ O-15 STATE SECONDARY ROADS--Added Item Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Walker, to approve , the DOT recommendation that Big Oak Drive and Meadow Road be added to the State o Secondary Road System. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, O. D-16 NORTHSIDE CONTRACT--Added Item The Manager told the Board that at its meeting on December 6th the Board , had awarded the plumbing contract to Worth Plumbing of Durham for the Northside • Adolescent Treatment Center; however, Worth Plumbing is unable to obtain bonding • for the performance. The Manager recommends that the Board award the contract for , plumbing to the second low bidder, Sparrow and Sons for $11'265'00. Commissioner , Willhoit moved to approve the Manager's recommendation to award the plumbing con- , tract to Sparrow and Sons for $11,255.00; Commissioner Lloyd seconded the motion. • Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, O. O-17 NORTHERN ORANGE YOUTH COUNCIL RESOLUTION--Added Item • Commissioner Lloyd moved, seconded by Cpmmisinn Walker, to adopt the Resolution , recognizing the Northern Orange Youth Council for its work in Youth Involvement • Week. Vote: Ayes,5;noes, O. (The Resolution is on page of this book.) 0-18 ANNOUNCEMENT--Added Item cnmmissioner Whitted said that while voters had voted against Extended Area ▪ Coverage for telephone service from Hillsborough to Chapel Hill-Carrov,"` ., Utilities Commission had added an optional toll calling service for Centel subscribers. Commissioner Whitted related procedures to get the optional toll calling service. " ~ `" G�_ With no further business to come before the Board, Commissioner Walker moved, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to adjourn, Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, 0. Richard E. Whitted, Chair Paulette Pridgen-Pond, Clerk .-- ORANGE COUNTY WARD OF CaalISSIONVS Action Pgenda Itern No.1)-1 ACTION PLIENDA, rmll'asTrucc MEETMSG DATE Oscombcr 11, 1002 Subject: Mace Rod (SR 1384) Participatory Paving Project , i Department: Pl r"-----' . -----j LpubLic Hearing: y Yen _no Anning I 1 i f , ; ---• , -• — Inform:0= Contact,: Susan Smith A -aCh2eat‘S/: 1) Preliminary Assess- ment Resolution; 4) Final Assess- Phone Nalber: 732-8181 Ext. 359 ment Redolution; 3) Certificate of , ' Mailing PUIUK4E1 Public hearing on the Preliminary Assessment Resolution approved November 212, 1982 and Board action on the adoption of the Final Assessmenb Resolution for Mace Road (SR 1384) . 1 1 NEED: 1 Public input on the assessment basis and procedure for the Mace Road Participatory Paving Program project described in the Prdlimina4y and Final Assessment Resolutions. Clerk to the Board will file a Certificate of Mailing which will certify tliat the notices of this public hearing were mailed on or before December 3,. 1982. I The Certificate of Mailing is an attachment to this item. INPACT: If the Board finds the Preliminary Assessment Resolution satis- factory len the Board can adopt the Final Assessment Resolution. Upon adoption of the Final Assessment Resolution, the Preliminary Assessment Roll can be prepared an a public hearing set on the Roll. In addition, DOT can be paid the local share of the con- struction cost of the project with an anticipated paving date for Mace Road during 1983. RECOMMENDATION: Adoption of the Final Assessment Resolution A4ept the Certificate of Mailing offered by the Clerk an attached to this agenda item. Sc eduled the public hearing on the Preliminary Assessment Roil for January 18, 1983. (7 005 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I, Paulette Pridgen Pond, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that on or before the 3rd day of December, 1982, I mailed, by first-class mail, postage prepaid, a copy of the Preliminary Assessment Resolution for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving Dumont Drive (S.A. 1595), in Eno Township, Orange County, North Carolina, to each owner, as shown on the County tax records of property subject to assessment if the project is undertaken. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, this the day of , 1982. P-ULETTE PRIDGEN POND, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina (SEAL) G 3C; A meeting of the Board of Commissioners for Orange County, North Carolina, was held at Hillsborough, North Carolina, the regular place of meeting 7: December 14 at 30 o'clock p.m., on , 1982. Present: Commissioners Whitted. Lloyd, Marshall. Walker and Willhoit Absent: None *************************************************************************** The following resolution was read to the Board: FINAL ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION FOR THE FINANCING BY ORANGE COUNTY OF THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COST OF PAVING MACE ROAD (S.R. 1384), LOCATED IN CHEEKS TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. WHEREAS the Board of County Commissioners of Orange County has elected to finance the local share of the cost of paving Mace Road (S.R. 1384), located in Cheeks Township, Orange County, as permitted by North Carolina General Statute Section 153A-185(4) and as provided for in North Carolina General Statute Section 153A-205. IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED THAT: 1. Orange County shall undertake financing of the local share of paving Mace Road (S,R. 1384), in Cheeks Township, Orange County., North Carolina. 2. That the basis for assessment for the local share of the costs of this project shall be at an equal rate per lot. 3. Orange County will assess the 'total local share according to the basis set out in number 2 above which local share represents approximately twenty-seven percent (27%) of the total project cost. 4. No assessments of this project will be held in abeyance. U dl 5. The assessments shall be paid in the following manner: a. Within thirty (30) days after the notice of confirmation of the assessment role is published, each owner of the property may pay his assessment in full. b. Any assessment not paid in full as provided above shall be paid in five equal annual installments with the first such installment, with interest, due when 1983 property taxes are due, and the remaining installments, with interest, due on the same date in each successive year until the assessment is paid in full. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that: The total project cost is $70,655.02 and the amount to be financed and assessed by Orange County is $18,839.02, as follows: Total Costs Local Costs To be Financed By Orange County construction cost $70,000.00 $18,184.00 legal services $500.00 $500.00 publication and mailing costs $155.02 $155.02 Totals $70,655.02 $18,839.02 The County Manager is hereby directed to prepare a preliminary assessment roll which roll shall contain a tax description of each lot, parcel or tract of land assessed, the basis for the assessment, the amount assessed against each lot, parcel or tract of land assessed, the terms of payment and the name of the owner of each lot, parcel, or tract as far as can be ascertained from the County tax records. ■ After the preliminary assessment roll is completed, it shall be filed in the office of the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners, there to be available for public inspection until a public hearing is held on the said preliminary assessment ti U / roll. A public hearing on the preliminary assessment roll shall be held on January 14 1983 at 7:30 o'clock p.m., during the regular meeting of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina. The Clerk to the Board of Commissioners is hereby authorized and directed to cause a notice of the public hearing to be given by publication one time, not less than Ten (10) days prior to ,„latca.) ry_LL, 1983, the date set for the hearing, in a newspaper having a general circulation in Orange County. Such notice shall be in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL FILED WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE COUNTY PURSUANT TO THE DIRECTION OF THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AND PURSUANT TO THE BOARD'S DECISION TO FINANCE THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COST OF PAVING MACE ROAD (S.R. 1384), IN CHEEKS TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Article 9 of Chapter 153A of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the Board of Commissioners of Orange County has completed and filed a Preliminary Assessment Roll. Pursuant thereto: 1. Orange County shall undertake the financing of the local share of paving Mace Road (S.R. 1384), in Cheeks Township, Orange County, North Carolina. The amount to be financed by Orange County is estimated to be Eighteen Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty Nine and 02/100 Dollars ($18,839.02), including costs and attorneys fees. That portion of the costs of paving the above roads not financed by Orange County will be borne by the Department of Transportation or the State of North Carolina. 1133 2. The assessment roll completed is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, and available to the public for inspection. 3. The PubliC Hearing will be held at 7:30 o'clock p.m. on 1983, at the Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina, the regular place of meeting of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, in order to discuss all matters pertaining to the Preliminary Assessment Roll. At the time and place above stated, any resident of Orange County or any other interested person may appear and be heard. Dated, this the 6th day of Jan a , 1983. Paulette Pridgen Pond, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina The Clerk to the Board of Commissioners is hereby authorized and directed to cause a notice of the hearing to be mailed by first-class mail to each owner of property as listed on the roll, not less than Ten (10) days prior to Januar 1983, the date set for the hearing. The notice shall be in substantially the following form: NOTICE TO: Towner and property description from assessment roll] SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS DECISION TO FINANCE AND ASSESS THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COST OF PAVING MACE ROAD (S.R. 1384), IN CHEEKS TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a Public Hearing will be held by the _ _ Ut 4 — — .....,.... / Orange County Board of Commissioners on January 18 t 1983 at 7:30 o'clock p.m., at the Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina, to discuss / all matters pertaining to the subject Preliminary Assessment Roll. The Preliminary Assessment Roll has been filed with the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County at the Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina, and is available for public inspection. Please note that the amount of assessment on the property described in this Notice is $ 18,8:39,02 , as shown on the Assessment Roll on file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina. PAULETTE PRIDGEN POND, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina The Clerk to the Board of Commissioners is hereby directed to file with the Board of Commissioners a certificate that the notice of the public hearing on the preliminary assessment roll was mailed as directed using a form substantially as follows: CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I, Paulette Pridgen Pond, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that on or about January 4 , 1983, I mailed, by first-class mail postage prepaid, a Notice to ■ each property owner of the Public Hearing to be held on the Preliminary Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving Mace Road (S.R. 1384), located in Cheeks Township, Orange U3 --------- County, North Carolina. The Notice mailed set the date and time of the Public Hearing and also the amount of assessment on the property owned by the person to whom the Notice was sent according to the County tax records. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, this the 4th day of January , 1983. Paulette Pridgen Pond, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina This resolution is effective upon its passage. moved the passage of the Thereupon, Commissioner _Lloyd foregoing resolution and Commissioner seconded the Motion, and the resolution was passed by the following vote: -5- Ayes: -0- Noes: ********* ************************************************************** I, Paulette Pridgen Pond, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of the proceedings of said Board of Commissioners at a meeting held on December 14, 1982, so far as the same relate to the Final Assessment Resolution, determination of the project costs and preparation of the Preliminary Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving Mace Road (S.R. 1384), located in Cheeks Township, Orange County, North Carolina, as such proceedings are recorded in the Minute Book. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said Board, this the 20thday k-; of December , 198 2. • Paulette Pridgen Pond, Jerk to the Board of • Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina (SEAL) . _ 0 4 (g) • A meeting of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, was held at Hillsborough, North Carolina, the regular place of meeting at 7:30 o'clock p.m., on the 22nd day of November, 1982. Present: Commissioners Gustaveson, Marshall. Walker„.Whittpd and Willhoit Absent: None *************************************************************************** The following resolution was read to the Board: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION FOR THE FINANCING BY ORANGE COUNTY OF THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COSTS OF PAVING MACE ROAD (S.R. 1384), IN CHEEKS TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. WHEREAS the Board of County Commissioners of Orange County has received a petition requesting the paving of Mace Road (S.R. 1384), in Cheeks Township, Orange County, North Carolina, which petition has been signed by at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the owners of property adjoining the said roads, which property represents at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the lineal feet of frontage of the lands abutting the said roads, pursuant to North Carolina General Statute Section 153A-205(c); and WHEREAS the Board of Commissioners of Orange County has elected to finance the local share of the costs of paving- the said roads, as permitted by North Carolina General Statutes Section 153A-185(4) and as provided for in North Carolina General Statute Section 153A-205; IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED THAT: L Orange County shall undertake financing of the local share of paving Mace Road (S.R. 1384), in Cheeks Township, Orange County, North 0 el) Carolina. 2. That the basis for assessment for the local share of the costs of this project shall be at an equal rate per lot. 3. Orange County will assess the total local share according to the basis set out in number 2 above which local share represents approximately twenty-seven percent (27%) of the total project cost. 4. No assessments of this project will be held in abeyance. 5. The assessments shall be paid in the following manner: a. Within thirty (30) days after the notice of confirmation of the assessment role is published, each owner of the property may pay his or her assessment in full. b. Any assessment not paid in full as provided above shall be paid in five equal annual installments with the first such installment, with interest, due when 1983 property taxes are due, and the remaining installments, with interest, due on the same date in each successive year until the assessment is paid in full. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that a public hearing on all matters covered by this preliminary assessment resolution will be held on the 14th day of December, 1982, at 7:30 o'clock p..m., during the regular meeting of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina. The Clerk to the Board of Commissioners is hereby authorized and directed to cause a notice of the public hearing to be given by pubication one time, not less than Ten (10) days prior to December 14, 1982, the date set for the hearing, in a newspaper having a general circulation in Orange County. Such notice shall be in substantially the following form: • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS TO FINANCE THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COSTS OF PAVING MACE ROAD (S.R. 1384), 1N CHEEKS TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Article 9 of Chapter 153A of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the Board of Commissioners of Orange County has adopted a Preliminary Assessment Resolution as follows: 1. Orange County shall undertake financing of the local share of paving Mace Road (S.R. 1384), in Cheeks Township, Orange County, North Carolina. 2. The basis for assessment for the local share of the costs of this project shall be at an equal rate per lot. • Orange County will assess the total local share according to the basis set out in number 2 above which local share represents approximately twenty-seven percent (27%) of the total project cost. 4. No assessments of this project will be held in abeyance. 5. The assessments shall be paid in the following manner: a. Within thirty (30) days after the notice of confirmation of the assessment roll is published, each owner of the property may pay his or her assessment in full. b. Any assessment not paid in full as provided above shall be paid in five equal annual installments with the first such installment, with interest, due when 1983 property 'taxes are due, and the remaining installments, with interest, due on the same date in each successive year until the assessment is paid in full. 02"( .4, A public hearing will be held at 7:30 o'clock p.m., on the 14th day of December, 1982, at the Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina, the regular place of meeting of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, in order to discuss all matters covered by the preliminary assessment resolution. At the time and place above stated any resident of Orange County or any other interested person may appear and be heard. This the 3rdday of _December , 1982. PATJLETTE PRIDGEN POND, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for Orange County, North Carolina The Clerk to the Board of Commissioners is hereby authorized and directed to cause a copy of this Preliminary Assessment Resolution to be mailed by first-class mail to each owner, as shown on the county tax records of property subject to assessment if the project is undertaken, not less than Ten (10) days prior to December 14, 1982. The Clerk to the Board of Commissioners is hereby directed to file with the Board of Commissioners a certificate that the Preliminary Assessment Resolution was mailed as directed using a form substantially as follows: CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I, Paulette Pridgen Pond, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that on or before the 3rd 0 / ••'-X day of December, 1982, I mailed, by first-class mail, postage prepaid, a copy of the Preliminary Assessment Resolution for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving Mace Road (S.R. 1384), in Cheeks Township, Orange County, North Carolina, to each owner, as shown on the County tax records of property subject to assessment if the project is undertaken. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, this the 3rd day of December , 1982. (3' PAULETTE PRIDGEN POND, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina (SEAL) This resolution is effective upon its passage. Thereupon Commissioner moved the passage of the foregoing resolution and Commissioner Gusta.A__teson____ seconded the motion, and the resultion was passed by the following vote: Ayes: -5- Noes: -0- I, Paulette Pridgen Pond, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of the proceedings of said Board of Commissioners at a meeting held on the 22nd day of November, 1982, so far as the same relate to the Preliminary Assessment Resolution for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving Mace Rand (S.R. 1384), in Cheeks Township, Orange County, !.! fl)9 - .14.:V.V.• •,■t..,;11411,,, ,. ‘‘. North Carolina, as such proceedings are recorded in Minute Book WITNESS my hand and the offical seal of said Board, this the 3rd day of December , l982., PAULETTE PRIDGEN POND, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina (SEAL) MAIZE COUNTY HOARD OF COEMISSIONERS Action Agenda Itat ACTION AGENDA, rroliwisnma PMETING DATEDecember 14, 1982 1 1 Subject: Dumont Drive (Si 1595) Participatory Paving Project [ Department: Planning ITTIElic Hearing: , x yes AbUldlnEnt(S):1) Preliminary Assess- 114EOZTaE#Orl CCIntaCt2 Susan Smith cent Resolution; 12) Final Assess- ment Rersolution0) Certificate of Itambkmber: 732-8181 EXT. 359 MáiTliJ MUIIEE: Public haring on the Preliminary Assessment Resolution approved November 122, 1982 and Board action on the adoption of the Final Assessment Resolution for Dumont Drive (SR1595), 1 1 NEED: Public input on the assessment basis and procedure for the Dumont Drive pat/ticipatary Paving Program projgct. desczibed in the Preliminary and Final Assessment ReSolutiong.-- Clerk to the Board will file a Certificate of Mailing which will certify t1hat the notices of this public hearing were mailed on or before December 3, 1982. The Certificate of Mailing is an attachment to this item. IMPACT: If the Board finds the Preliminary Assessment Resolution satis- factory then the Board can adopt the Final Assessment Resolution. Upon ; adolption of the Final Assessment Resolution, the Preliminary Assessment Roll can be prepared and a public hearing set on the noll. In' addition, DOT can be paid the local share of the con- struction cost of the project with an anticipated paving date for Dumont,Drive dating RECOMMENDATION: Adoption of the Final Assessment Resolution. Accept the Certificate of Mailing offered by the Clerk and attached to this agenda item. Schedule the public hearing an the Preliminary Assessment Roll for January 18, 1983. 023 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I, Paulette Pridgen Pond, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that on or before the 3rd day of December, 1982, I mailed, by first-class mail, postage prepaid, a copy of the Preliminary Assessment Resolution for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving Mace Road (S.R. 1384), in Cheeks Township, Orange County, North Carolina, to each owner, as shown on the County tax records of property subject to assessment if the project is undertaken. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the Board of Commissioners of /11.1 Orange County, North Carolina, this the day of &c.r.-1-04.1.—,, 1982. PAULETTE PRIDGEN POND, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina (SEAL) 0 t: A meeting of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Caroline, was held at Hillsborough, North Carolina, the regular place of meeting at 7:30 o'clock p.m., on the 22nd day of November, 1982. Present: Commissioners Gustaveson, Marshall , Walker, Whitted and Wilihoit Absent: None *************************************************************************** The following resolution was read to the Board: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION FOR THE FINANCING BY ORANGE COUNTY OF THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COSTS OF PAVING DUMONT DRIVE (S.R. 1595), IN ENO TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. WHEREAS the Board of County Commissioners of Orange County has received a petition requesting the paving of Dumont Drive (S.R. 1595), in Eno Township, Orange County, North Carolina, which petition has been signed by at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the owners of property adjoining the said roads, which property represents at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the lineal feet of frontage of the lands abutting the said roads, pursuant to North Carolina General Statute Section 153A-205(c); and WHEREAS the Board of Commissioners of Orange County has elected to finance the local share of the costs of paving the said roads, as permitted by North Carolina General Statutes Section 153A-185(0 and as provided for in North Carolina General Statute Section 153A-205; IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED THAT: 1. Orange County shall undertake financing of the local share of paving Dumont Drive (S.R.1595), in Eno Township, Orange County, North Carolina. C 2. That the basis for assessment for the local share of the costs of this project shall be frontage abutting the road at an equal rate per foot of frontage. 3. Orange County will assess the total local share according to the basis set out in number 2 above which local share represents approximately thirty-three percent (33%) of the total project cost. 4. No assessments of this project will be held in abeyance. 5. The assessments shall be paid in the following manner: a. Within thirty (30) days after the notice of confirmation of the assessment role is published, each owner of the property may pay his or her assessment in full. b. Any assessment not paid in full as provided above shall be paid in five equal annual installments with the first such installment, with interest, due when 1983 property taxes are due, and the remaining installments, with interest, due on the same date in each successive year until the assessment is paid in full. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that a public hearing on all matters covered by this preliminary assessment resolution will be held on the 14th day of December, 1982, at 7:30 o'clock p..m., during the regular meeting of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina. The Clerk to the Board of Commissioners is hereby authorized and directed to cause a notice of the public hearing to be given by pubication one time, not less than Ten (10) days prior to December 14, 1982, the date set for the hearing, in a newspaper having a general circulation in Orange County. Such notice shall be in substantially the following form: 0i2' . NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS TO FINANCE THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COSTS OF PAVING DUIVIONT DRIVE (S.R. 1595), IN ENO TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Article 9 of Chapter 153A of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the Board of Commissioners of Orange County has adopted a Preliminary Assessment Resolution as follows: 1. Orange County shall undertake financing of the local share of paving Dumont Drive (S.R. 1595), in Eno Township, Orange County, North Carolina. 2. The basis for assessment for the local share of the costs of this project shall be frontage abutting the road at an equal rate per foot of frontage. 3. Orange County will assess the total local share according to the basis set out in number 2 above which local share represents approximately thirty-three percent (33%) of the total project cost. 4. No assessments of this project will be held in abeyance. 5. The assessments shall be paid in the following manner: a. Within thirty (30) days after the notice of confirmation of the assessment roll is published, each owner of the property may pay his or her assessment in full. b. Any assessment not paid in full as provided above shall be paid in five equal annual installments with the first such installment, with interest, due when 1983 property taxes are due, and the remaining installments, with interest, due on the same date in each successive year until the assessment is paid in full. 0 IL' A public hearing will be held at 7:30 o'clock p.m., on the 14th day of December, 1982, at the Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina, the regular place of meeting of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, in order to discuss all matters covered by the preliminary assessment resolution. At the time and place above stated any resident of Orange County or any other interested person may appear and be heard. This the 3rd day of,,,December , 1982. PAULETTE PRIDGEN POND, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for Orange County, North Carolina The Clerk to the Board of Commissioners is hereby authorized and directed to cause a copy of this Preliminary Assessment Resolution to be mailed by first-class mail to each owner, as shown on the county tax records of property subject to assessment if the project is undertaken, not less than Ten (10) days prior to December 14, 1982. The Clerk to the Board of Commissioners is hereby directed to file with the Board of Commissioners a certificate that the Preliminary Assessment Resolution was mailed as directed using a form substantially as follows: CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I, Paulette Pridgen Pond, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that on or before the 3rd 0 4 day of December, 1982, I mailed, by first-class mail, postage prepaid, a copy of the Preliminary Assessment Resolution for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving Dumont Drive (S.R. 1595), in Eno Township, Orange County, North Carolina, to each owner, as shown on the County tax records of property subject to assessment if the project is undertaken. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, this the 4 -- day of ace...,ta..k..) , 1982. C?a 07) - PAULETTE PRIDGEN •OND, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina (SEAL) This resolution is effective upon its passage. Thereupon Commissioner Wi1lhoi t moved the passage of the foregoing resolution and Commissioner Gus taves on seconded the motion, and the resultion was passed by the following vote: Ayes: -5- -0- Noes: *************************************************************************** I, Paulette Pridgen Pond, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of the proceedings of said Board of Commissioners at a meeting held on the 22nd day of November, 1982, so far as the same relate to the Preliminary Assessment Resolution for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving Dumont Drive (S.R. 1595), in Eno Township, Orange County, North Carolina, as such proceedings are recorded in Minute Book .174e WITNESS my hand and the offical seal of said Board, this the — day of jacc,,(L.L.,.. , 1982. PAULETTE PRIDGEN OND, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina (SEAL) (? 6 A meeting of the Board of Commissioners for Orange County, North Carolina, was held at Hillsborough, North Carolina, the regular place of meeting at 7:3° o'clock p.m., on December 14 19F2, Present: Commissioners 'Whitted, Lloyd, Marshall, Walker and Willhoit Absent: None *************************************************************************** The following resolution was read to the Board: FINAL ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION FOR THE FINANCING BY ORANGE COUNTY OF THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COST OF PAVING DUMONT DRIVE (S.R. 1595), LOCATED IN ENO TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. WHEREAS the Board of County Commissioners of Orange County has elected to finance the local share of the cost of paving Dumont Drive (S.R. 1595), located in Eno Township, Orange County, as permitted by North Carolina General Statute Section 153A-185(4) and as provided for in North Carolina General Statute Section I53A-205. IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED THAT: 1. Orange County shall undertake financing of the local share of paving Dumont Drive (S.R. 1595), in Eno Township, Orange County, North Carolina. 2. That the basis for assessment for the local share of the costs of this project shall be frontage abutting the road at an equal rate per foot of frontage. 3. Orange County will assess the total local share according to the basis set out in number 2 above which local share represents approximately thirty-three percent (33%) of the total project cost. 0 I 4. No assessments of this project will be held in abeyance. 5. The assessments shall be paid in the following manner: a. Within thirty (30) days after the notice of confirmation of the assessment role is published, each owner of the property may pay his assessment in full. b. Any assessment not paid in full as provided above shall be paid in five equal annual installments with the first such installment, with interest, due when 1983 property taxes are due, and the remaining installments, with interest, due on the same date in each successive year until the assessment is paid in full. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that: The total project cost is $76,552.00 and the amount to be financed and assessed by Orange County is $24,688.00, as follows: Total Costs Local Costs 'robe Financed By Orange County construction cost $75,932.00 $24,068.00 legal services $500.00 $500.00 publication and mailing costs $120.00 $120.00 Totals $76,552.00 $24,688.00 The County Manager is hereby directed to prepare a preliminary assessment roll which roll shall contain a tax description of each lot, parcel or tract of land assessed, the basis for the assessment, the amount assessed against each lot, parcel or tract of land assessed, the terms of payment and the name of the owner of each lot, parcel, or tract as far as can be ascertained from the County tax records. After the preliminary assessment roll is completed, it shall be filed in the office of the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners, there to be available for public inspection until a public hearing is held on the said preliminary assessment roll. A public hearing on the preliminary assessment roll shall be held on ,1anrlary 18, 1983 at 7 all o'clock p.m., during the regular meeting of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina. The Clerk to the Board of Commissioners is hereby authorized and directed to cause a notice of the public hearing to be given by publication one time, not less than Ten (1D) days prior to ,ianiiary 1R , 1983, the date set for the hearing, in a newspaper having a general circulation in Orange County. Such notice shall be in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL FILED WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE COUNTY PURSUANT TO THE DIRECTION OF THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AND PURSUANT TO THE BOARD'S DECISION TO FINANCE THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COST OF PAVING DUMONT DRIVE (S.R. 1595), IN ENO TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Article 9 of Chapter 153A of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the Boarli of Commissioners of Orange County has completed and filed a Preliminary Assessment Roll. Pursuant thereto: 1. Orange County shall undertake the financing of the local share of paving Dumont Drive (S.R. 1595), in Eno Township, Orange County, North Carolina. The amount to be financed by Orange County is estimated to be Twenty Four Thousand Six Hundred Eighty Eight and No/100 Dollars ($24,688.00), including costs and attorneys fees. That portion of the costs of paving the above roads not financed by Orange County will be borne by the Department of Transportation or the State of North Carolina. 2. The assessment roll completed is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, and available to the public for inspection. 3. The Public Hearing will be held at 730 o'clock p.m. on January 18 , 1983, at the Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina, the regular place of meeting of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, in order to discuss all matters pertaining to the Preliminary Assessment Roll. At the time and place above stated, any resident of Orange County or any other interested person may appear and be heard. Dated, this the 6th day of January , 1983. Paulette Pridgen Pond, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina The Clerk to the Board of Commissioners is hereby authorized and directed to cause a notice of the hearing to be mailed by first-class mail to each owner of property as listed on the roll, not less than Ten (10) days prior to January 18 , 1983, the date set for the hearing. The notice shall be in substantially the following form: 02C NOTICE TO: [owner and property description from assessment roll) SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' DECISION TO FINANCE AND ASSESS THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COST OF PAVING DUMONT DRIVE (S.R. 1595), IN ENO TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a Public Hearing will be held by the Orange County Board of Commissioners on January 18 , 1983 at '7:30 o'clock p.m., at the Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina, to discuss all matters pertaining to the subject Preliminary Assessment Roll. The Preliminary Assessment Roll has been filed with the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County at the Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina, and is available for public inspection. Please note that the amount of assessment on the property described in this Notice is $24,688.00 , as shown on the Assessment Roll on file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina. PAULETTE PRIDGEN POND, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina The Clerk to the Board of Commissioners is hereby directed to file with the Board of Commissioners a certificate that the notice of the public hearing on the preliminary assessment roll was mailed as directed using a form substantially as follows: CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I, Paulette Pridgen Pond, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that on or about January 4th , 1983, I mailed, by first-class mail, postage prepaid, a Notice to each property owner of the Public Hearing to be held on the Preliminary Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving Dumont Drive (S.R. 1595), located in Eno Township, Orange County, North Carolina. The Notice mailed set the date and time of the Public Hearing and also the amount of assessment on the property owned by the person to whom the Notice was sent according to the County tax records. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, this the 4th day of January , 1983. Paulette Pridgen Pond, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina This resolution is effective upon its passage. Thereupon, Commissioner Willhoit moved the passage of the foregoing resolution and Commissioner Marshall seconded the Motion, and the resolution was passed by the following vote: Ayes: -5-. Noes: -0- I, Paulette Pridgen Pond, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of the proceedings of said Board of Commissioners at a meeting held ` ,2 on December 14, 1982, so far as the same relate to the Final Assessment Resolution, determination of the project costs and preparation of the Preliminary Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving Dumont Drive (S.R. 1595), located in Eno Township, Orange County, North Carolina, as such proceedings are recorded in the Minute Book. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said Board, this the 2Othday of December , 1983. ar • —aulette Pridgen Po d, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina (SEAL) ' ' ^ ^ oRANEcOUNTY BOARD orCOMMISSIONERS uctiopAlgenda �� zt�` eo' / �- � m�z� ��� r�« �s�Cc x�E� a� DATE DECEMBER 14, 1982 Subject: RE3OLUTI '' --- ' • [-ceparsnent: K puo�c H,°' �KD $p COMMISSIONERS J ~g: es x no =-°~o.`e'.`-^' Yes, Resolution Phone amber: 732-8181 ext., 510 -- PURPOSE: Consideration of a Resolution of Congratulations to the Orange County Family upermarket Wildcats. NEED: For the consecutive an ,'~''g~: ` Recreation Football team-� year has won a State Championship in its category. This `-` the Orange County Recreation and Parks Deparment Family Supermarket Wildcats won the 1982 NC State Midget Football Chvmp- ionnhip') � n� :ouching staff� thanks to the IMPACT: ^"~°,"'^ the team -- - Sup rs ermarket owner Norman Huithcock for sponsoring xmsor, � pe � up� vno� , program, v, Orange County youth. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt th Resolution and empower the Chair to sign. ' //1 z, ~ ~ O�� ~ /) � _ _ „ ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Room Na 12 106 s^srnmmGAuET LANE HILL SononomH,N. c 27278 RICHARD c=""u`�~~ NORMAN GUSTAVESO° SHIRLEY,MARSHALL NORMAN WALKER RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS TO ORANGE COUNTY FAMILY SUPERMARKET WILDCATS WHEREAS, The Orange County Family Supermarket Wildcats of the Orange County Recreation and Parks Deparment Youth Football League have participated in the County recreation program since their formation in l381; and, WHEREAS, Joe Cates has been head coach of the Wildcats for these two years, giving generously of his time and talents to the youth of Orange County through the recreation program for the past six years; and, ,.�� WHEREAS, Coach Cates, with support from his assistantcpaches, Larry Knight, Tate-Latta, ie Wiley and Charles Dunn, molded, Wild in two short years; - WHEREAS, The Wildcats won h ' Northern District Conference title1by 'defeating the Durham.Youth Club and-continued winning by defeating- Carrboro -and A7dffiance County,—thereby winning the Eastern Region Midget Football Championship of 1982; and" --. p WHEREAS, The Wildcats u | d 1982 North Carolina State Midget Foo-tball'Ch8in-nfOnship—on November Z7,-l982, by defeating a tough and formidable Lee County team, Western Region Champ- ions by a score of I4-5. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Orange County Board of Commissioners, acting through its members, Ben Lloyd, Shirley E. Narshall , Norman Walker, Richard E. Whitted and Don Willhoit, for the citizens of Orange County, takes this opportunity to express its sincere and joyful congratulations to the ORANGE COUNTY FAMILY SUPERMARKET WILDCATS for an outstanding accomp7ishment. THIS, the 14th day of December, 1982. RICM8R* E. hHDT D, CxAI. Orange County Board of Commissioners tt ��� _ � � _ upAmsE obumrY Oti� BOARD nrCOMMTSSIONERS Action Agenda ALa4oN AGENDA rrExABSTRACT Item No."I -14 MEETING DAZE December 14. 1982 Subject: Request for Tax Refunds and Tax Releases ] oeEactneot; T,' e' ' , | Public Hearing: yes x_ nol 'Attachgsnt(ii: --- Information Contact: Archie Kelly Summary Sheets , Assistant Tax Supervisor ------ Phone Number: 414 RUonxGE, Board consideration of tax release and refunds. The Board tabled these two requests until December 14, 1982. NEED: The following companies have requested tax releases and or refunds in the amount indicated. TAXPAYER Brujest, Inc. (Philip Berkowitz, President) (error by taxpayer in listing business personalty) Cecil U. Riley (seeks use valuation classification for 1981) RECOMMENDATION: As indicated on the individual summary sheets, ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Room. No 12 106 EAST ?■iARGARET LANE HILLSBOR0UGX-1,N. C. 27278 tumuli)E.WHITTEO,Chaim.* NORMAN GUSVAVESON SHIRLEY 2 MARSHALL NORMAN WALKER DON WILLHOIT December 9, 1982 Mr. Philip Berkowitz, President Brujest, 19c. 145 E. Fralklin Street Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514 Dear Mr. BL.kowitz: TheOrange County Board of Commissioners deferred action on your requet that Brujest's business personalty be reduced for 1980 and 1981 utll the meeting on Tuesday, December 14, 1982. That meeting will be held at 7:30 P.M. in the Commissioners' Room, Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina. The Board deferred action because it understood that you had planned to be present for consideration of your request; the Board will take action on your request at the meeting on December 14th. If have any questions please give me a call at 967-9251, extension plo. Sincerely, re Paulette Pridgen-Pond, Clerk Orange County Board of Commissioners cc: Mr. Kermit Lloyd, Tax Supervisor Orande County Commissioners 0 E • -• TAX RELEASE REQUEST BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DECEMBER 6, 1982 Philip Berkowitz, President Brujest, Incorporated D/B/A Baskin—Robbins Ice Cream Store Mr. Berkowitz requests that the 14'80 and 1981 tax valuations of the Corporation's business personally be reduced (by $31,238 for 1980, by $30,544 for 1981) because the 1981 tax listing for the Corporation (upon which the 1980 and 1981 tax valuations were based) was erroneous in that it showed $62,100 as the acquisition cost of equipment ($27;391) and leasehold improvements ($34,709),whereas the cost figure given for leasehold improvements actually represents that portion of the purchase price paid for the business which is attributable, to good will. RECOMMENDATION: Withheld pending testimony by Mr. Berkowitz ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Room No 12 106 EAST MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGH,N. G. 27278 RICHARD L WHETTED, NORMAN GUSTAVE-LON SHIRLEY E MARSHALL NORMAN'SIMILES DON VILER= December 9, 1982 Mr. Cecil tiG Riley Route 1, Bo X 93 Chapel Hill i North Carolina 27514 Dear Mr. Riley:i The Orange County Board of Commissioners deferred action on your request that a tract of land be classified for agricultural use valuation for 1981 until the meeting on Tuesday, December 14, 1982. Thatimeeting will be held at 7:30 P.M. in the Commissioners' Room, Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina. The Board deferred action because it understood that you had planned to le present for consideration of your request; the Board will take action on your request at the meeting on December 14th. If you have any questions please give me a call at 967-9251, extension 5If0. Sincerely, Paulette Pridgen-Pond, Clerk Orange County Board of Commissioners cc: Mr. Kermit Lloyd, Tax Supervisor Orange County Commissioners TX RELEASE AND REFUND REQUEST BOARD OF COUNTY COMISSIONERS DECEMBER 6, 1982 Cecil W. Riley Mr. Riley requests that this tract be classified for agricultural use valuation for 191, presumably upon the grounds that he filed a timely application for use valuation for 1981 showing that the property qualified for the classification. The Tax Supervisor's Office has no record of a timely filed 1981 application, but has approved use valuation classification for the property for 1982 based upon an application filed in January, 1982. RECOMUNDATION: Withheld pending testimony by Mr. Riley • ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF caeassumns Action Agenda Item No. 1)-5 ACTION AGLAIDA il.T.A ABSTRACT MEET= DATE 12/14/82 . Subject: Public Hearing Request • t: Planning , Public Hearing: ... _yes x no --r----= .-_—__— AttackmMnt(s): None inforcatacr: Contact: Marvin Collins Plum Number: 732-8181 ext. 349 PURMSE: Board consideration of a request to set a date for a special joint public hearing to consider a modification for The Timbers. NEED: The Developer of The Timbers wishes to modify the fourth (4th) phase of the park. They missed the submittal deadline for the November public hearing and asked that a special hearing be held before the next regular hearing in February. There has been interest expressed by one other Developer for inc'usion in this special hearing also. January 24, 1983 is the earliest date such a public hearing could be held. EMPCT: The January date would Move the final action date up by one month. RECOMMENDATION: A the Board decides. 1 I 1 I 1 , 1 , - ..- ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING- DEPARTMENT BILLSBOROITOU NORTH CAROLINA 27278 6.01 Or os. $ E2.4 • 1 et I: 411. 4h F tp '14 ¢.10 0' MEMORANDUM L TO: KEN THOMPSON, C UNTY MANAGER 11A2C-) FROM: MARVIN COLLINS, PLANNING DIRECTOR DATE: DECEMBER 14, 11.982 RE: JAMES RAY FREELAND - REQUEST FOR SPECIAL PUBLIC HEARING Mr. James Ray Freeland has purchased a 149-acre tract located on the west side of N.C. Highway 86 south of Interstate 85. He wishes to develop approximately 10 acres initially as a single-family subdivision with 10,000 sq.ft. lots (four units/acre). The acreage in question is located at the southern end of the tract (see attached map). Due to forthcoming high interest payments that he will have to pay, Mr. Freeland is anxious to initiate his request for a land use plan amendment and zoning change. The regular public hearing date is February 28, 1983. He would like to have his requests heard at the Board of Commissioner's January 24, 1983 if possible. A similar request has already been made by Mr. John McAdams in regard to a modification of the Timbers site plan, so both matters could be heard at the same meeting. . 1 If a public hearing is scheduled for the January 24 meeting, legal requirements concerning proper advertisement could be met. The notice of public hearing could be placed in the lock newspaper (News of Orange) on January 5, 1983 and January 12, 1983, so advertising repreSents no constraint. As a matter of information, the property is presently zoned R-1 Rural Residential which r allows one dwelling nit per acre. Most of the surrounding area is located in the same zoning district with the exception of properties immediately to the south. These are located inian EC-5 Existing Commercial classification. Mr. Freeland would have to secure an Rt4 Medium Intensity Residential zoning classification in order to carry out his development plans. . I In addition to the zoning change, a land use plan amendment would be necessary. The property is designated as Rural Residential on the Land Use Plan, and the designation would have to be chaAged to either a 10 or 20 Transition Area. • .11,, ,\a' ik ,,,, s , - „....4441 .:....,. ..... . . ,....„4...,,y.,,:,„:„.,..w,,,..: :;t,.....„,, ,-. 11*(a) •_. . 13 . , 1.rIft **/ ''''.‘, ,, ,„.f....,„.. ..<:,...es„.1,i*:::::x....::*:;.*.o..,..„4:1:gki,4.::1,:::st ....0,..,,„......;,....e.,:::.s.::„:::::::::,4,,,,, ...., .3.,,,,),..,,,.,.cog„..,:i is,.,wv.,,....:::::.:::::::,,,?4,e,. w.A.,.i.,:e. ,....it. :,..., ,,v,.....,.,..„...,..,„,„,,,_li,..'.X1 ,,"..g.1 W*4 t..4,'1:$:AN,*(0{,,, ,f.,...'if.,,,,,,:'. --, ', , 0 4 ,.,... ~ Mr.RD. .4....iig71 ' . -...-- __ I i AU 0 1:7 I t ... ON CD I so i j N. ik .:. 1 ,......_.-..,......, ,1/4,...,...,:t-- ..- ,•,%',.: ,i7.,,,,t-x.,-;',„--..*.% ''''`Nz,,,,,,‘ ,,, • 1822 titt,' „:45/..._is: „.„ ts,./.,,L4, -4, . ,1'..r. ...„, \-‘• AO '7 4.,.. ' .!to DR. 7 : ..,.0>M".")'i.1.0— 1 --- — ...,......b,. 77.2,.. . ‘ , ...., • AV-{ \ 1 ad ( ‘ .:;:r?,.P.1-.1..,-;4'..;-:IPT...":"si,-:?.'-'44.',4,--*-',#,".„,w,b?,... '-n.A.,.."..4:',—,e.'. 0 ,..,Ecza;i ),,,,,,- (x), © .,.. .,,„„,,,;,,,,„,„.„.,„„„„:„,„,„„,,,„„,,,, , .. . ..... ..... . ........,...,/,,,,,,....„:„....„... ...,... •..,N?I',8,,,,az, 4 toll OMNI leat MO •-, tam Rai 1c$31 moo KLAN -CATEGORIES: MURBAN 1C YEAR TRANSITION M20YEAR TRANSITION M RURAL SUPPER = RURAL RESIDENTIAi- =AGRICULTURAL RES. PLAN MPUBLIC INTEREST AREA [E]WATER SUPPLY WATERSHED' ACTIVITY NODES: 0-COMMERCIAL TRANSITION GICOM./INOUSTRIAL TRANSITION RURAL INDUSTRIAL ONCE != PREPARED By CFUVNna CC, MAt,^4r,43 C)epr ORAME COUNTY I i BOARD OF CaMiSSIO S . Action Agenda { ACTION AGENDA ITE`S ABSTRACT Item NO. b 4, MEETING 0.1TE December 6 982 Subject: Transportation Advisory Committee for the Durham Urbanized Area Depa LTMEnt: Planting Public FFaring: _yes . x __ID i Att clmferft(g):a). -tter to Richard Whitted ' fo17Dat3An Contact: Susan Smith from A. Carroll Pledger dated 7/27/82; b) Memorandum of Understanding (HOU); c)Map Phepp1 Number: 732-8181, EXT. 359 .nf the Durham Orbnni70A Arun 1 PURPOSE: To appointea representative of the Orange County Board of Commissioner') to the Transportation Advisory Committee (TAO) for the Durham Urbanized Area. Imo: As a result of the 1980 census, the Durham urbanized area was extended to include the Towns Of Chapel Hill and Carrboro and two portions of Orange County. Federal law requires an ongoing transportation planning process for urbanized areas over 50,000 pardons. Due to the census change, the Towns of Chapel Hill and Carrboro and OrangelCounty are to be included in the process as currently specified in a 1975 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) through which was established a Transportation Advisory Committee responsible for transportation planning in the urbanized area. A TAC meeting in January 1983 will be scheduled pending appointment of a Board member. - I 1 I 142111C7: Appointment of a representative of the Board to the TAC will provide for input from OrangeiCounty on transportation planning policies and decisions in the Durham urbanized area as they affect Orange County. Primary transportation responsibility of the TAC is the approval of the Transportation Improvement Program in the Durham urbanized area submitted to DOT each year. The Board Member appointed will participate in a TAC meeting to be scheduled in January 1983. RECOMMENDATION: As the Boa1d decides. I II I 1 1 { I iI I • . 0,11 OLD U.44_79 CITY OF DURHAM NORTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER II 0 CITY HALL PLAZA p*nrw | 919+03-0222 July 27, 1982 Chairman Mr. Richard E. Whitted, Orange County Do,4rd of Commissioners 106-E. Margaret iane Hillsborough, Notth Carolina 27278 !subject: Durham Transportation Study As a result of tlie 1980 Census, the Durham urbanized area was extended to include the Towns of Chaim]. Hill and Carrboro and portions of orange County. For urbanized areas of over 50j000 population, Federal Law requires that a cooperative, compre- hensive, and con planning requirements, it is necessary that the transportation planning study area and planning organization in the Durham urbanized area be extended to include Chapel Hill, Cariboro, and portions of orange County. The planning orgnization and transportation planning responpibility in the Durham urbanized area currently is specified in a 1975 Memorandum of Understanding (KOU) approved by the City of Durham, Durham County, and the North Carolina Department of Transportatiol. The mou established a Transportation Advisory committee (TAC) to act in an adv,sory capacity as related to the direction, control, and super- vision of the po;icy, planning, and technical activities which comprise the cooperative, comOrehensive, and continuing transportation planning process. The TAC is composed Of representatives from the Durham City council, Durham county Board of Commissioners, and North Carolina Board of Transportation. In order to update the HOU to include Chapel. Hill, carrboro, and orange County, I would appreciae your appointing a representative from your County commissioners to work with theITAC on a revised MOD for the larger urbanized area that can then be recommended to the participating agencies for their approval. Your assistance in this regard will be sincerely appreciated. A. Carroll Pledger, Chai7A Durham Transportation Adiiisory Cammittee ucp:js cc: mx Kenneth R. Thompson, county manager Durham TAC Members AN EQUAL ACTION EMPLOYER _ --- � ' ' ----------- - ----� --------r--------- - - ' ! / ' . ' , : .......■■, . .: - -• • f N i I 1 1 1 , . . MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING between page 1 of 9 '- THE CITY OF DURHAM, COUNTY OF DURHAM, AND NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF TRANSPORTATION IN COOPERATION WITH THE UNITED STATES DEPART- MENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION WITNESSETH TRAT EREAS, Chapter 136, Article 3A, Section 136-66.2(a) of the General Statutes of North Carolina requires that: "Each municipaiitty with the cooperation of the Board of Transporta- tion, shall; develop a comprehensive plan for a street system that will srve present and anticipated volumes of vehicular traffic in and around the municipality. The plan shall be based on th0 best information available including, but not limited to, population growth, economic conditions and pro- spects, and patterns of land development in and around the municipality, and shall provide for the safe and effective use of struts and highways through such means as parking re- gulations, signal systems , and traffic signs, markings, and other devics. The Board of Transportation may provide fi- nancial anditechnical assistance in the preparation of such plans."; and, WHEREAS, the said Chapter 136, Article 3A, Section 136-66.2(b)' provides that: "After completion and analysis of the plan, the plan may be adopted by both the governing body of the municipality and the Board of Transportation as the basis for future street and highway improvements in and around the Municipality. As a part of the plan, the governing body of the municipality and the Board of Transportation shall reach an ag eement as to which of the existing and proposed streets and highways included in the plan will be a part of the State Hi ghway System and which streets will be a part of the Municip 1 street system.. th As used in this article, the State Highw y System shall mean both the primary highway system of the State and the secondary road system of the State within municipalities."; and, i . . . . _ . . . . . . . , ' page 2 of 9 r. ' WHEREAS, Section 134 (a) of Title 23 United States Code states: "It i declared to be in the national interest to encourage and promote the development of transpor- tatioil systems embracing various modes of transport in a manner that will serve the States and local communities efficiently and effectively. To accom- plish this objective, the Secretary shall cooperate with the States, as authorized in this title, in the develi3pment of long-range highway plans and programs which are properly coordinated with plans for im- provements in other affected forms of transportation and which are formulated with due consideration to theirlprobable effect on the future development of urban areas of more than fifty thousand population. After July 1, 1965 the Secretary shall not approve under section 105 of this title any program for pro- jects in any urban area of more than fifty thousand population unless he finds that such projects are basedion a continuing comprehensive transportation plannang process carried on cooperatively by States and 'focal communities in conformance with the ob- jectives stated in this section. No highway project may 4 constructed in any urban area of 50,000 popu- lation or more unless the responsible public offi- cials lof such urban area in which the project is locatO have been consulted and their views consi- deredi with respect to the corridor, the location and the design of the project."; and, WHEREAS, a transportation planning process includes the operationai procedures and working arrangements by which short and long-range transportation plans are soundly conceived and developed and continuously evaluated in a manner that will: 1. Assist governing bodies and official agencies in determining courses of action and in formulating attainable capital improvement porgrams in antici- pation of community needs; and, 2. guide private individuals and groups in planning their decisions which can be important factors in the pattern of future development and redevelop- pent; and, WHEREAS, various sections of the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973, Pliblic Law 93-87 provides for new transportation pro- grams and modifies some existing programs, and . . , page 3 of 9 . ,. WHEREAp, it is the desire of these agencies that the previously established continuing, comprehensive, cooperative transportation planning process as set forth in a Memorandum of Understanding dated June 30, 1965, be revised and updated to comply with the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973, and the United States Department of Transportation Order No. 1130.2 and FederallHighway Administration Policy and Procedure Memorandum 50-11 dated September 21, 1973 (copies of both are attached) , the following Memorandum of Understanding is made. Sectio 1. It is hereby agreed that the CITY OF DURHAM, COUNT? OF- DORHAM, and the NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF TRANSPORTATION in cooperation with the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION will participate in a continuing transportation planning process with responsibilities and undertakings as related in the following p ragraphs: 1. Tile area involved, the Durham Urban Transportation Study Planning Area, will be the Durham Urbanized A. ea as defined by the United States Department of Clmmerce, Bureau of the Census, plus that area be- yond the existing urbanized area boundary that is expected to become urbanized within a twenty year p anning period. This area is hereinafter referred t. as the Planning Area. 2. e projected planning area boundary will be ,- - pe iodically reassessed and revised in the light of new developments and basic data projections fo. the current planning period. 3. The continuing transportation planning process wi11 be a cooperative one and all planning dis- cutsions will be reflective of and responsive tolthe program of the Board of Transportation, and to the comprehensive plans for growth and detelopment of the City of Durham, County of Du ham, and Triangle "J" Council of Governments . 1 4. Thg continuing transportation planning process will be in accordance with the intent, proce- dures, and programs of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. - ' : - , - i - . I 1 I 1 . , 1 1 page 4 of 9 -,. . , S. Transportation policy decisions within the Planning Area are the responsibility of the Nbrth Carolina Board of Transportation, the Durham City Council, and the Durham County . , Board of Commissioners. 6. Tlo facilitate coordination and communication between the several policy boards and between the policy bards and agencies represented on a Technical Co- ordinating Committee hereinafter defined, a Transpor- tation Advisory Committee is hereby established with the responsibility of serving as an intermediary in keeping the policy boards informed of the status and requirements of the transportation planning process and to assist in the dissemination and clarification of the decisions, inclinations, and policies of the policy board. The Transportation Advisory Committee will also assist in the development of a coordinated mtltimodal transportation capital improvements pro- gram for the planning area. The Transportation Advisory Committee will consist '44--- of one or two members of each of the policy boards or their representatives. The Transportation Advisory COmmittee will meet as often as it is deemed appro- p4iate and advisable. On the basis of majority vote , of its membership, the Transportation Advisory i Committee may appoint a member of the Committee to 1 act as Chairperson with the responsibility for coor- f: dination of the Committee's activities. A member I of the staff of the Durham Planning Division will serve as secretary to the Committee. Mo0-11 7. A 1Technical Coordinating Committee shall be established with the responsibility of general review, guidance, and coordination of the con- tinuing transportation planning process for the Planning Area and with the responsibility for mdking recommendations to the respective local and State governmental agencies regarding any necessary actions relating to the continuing transportation planning process. Membership of the Technical Coordinating Committee shall include technical representatives from all 10cal and State governmental agencies directly related to and concerned with the transportation planning process for the Planning Area. Ini- tially, the membership shall include, but not be limited to, the following: _A. ■ _ . ■ page 5 of 9 a. Director of Planning, City of Durham b. Manager of Planning and Research, . Division of Highways, North Carolina Department of Transportation c. Director of Transportation and Utilities, City of Durham d. Director of Traffic, City of Durham e. Director of Planning, County of Durham f. Division Engineer, Division of High- ways, North Carolina Department of Transportation g Thoroughfare Planning Engineer, Division of Highways, North Carolina Department of Transportation h. City Engineer, City of Durham i. Area Transportation Coordinator, Division of Highways, North Carolina Department of Transportation j Representative of Triangle "J" Council of Governments ki Planning and Research Engineer, North Carolina Division, Federal Highway Administration, United States Depart- ment of Transportation (Advisory and non-voting member) 1. District Engineer, North Carolina Division, Federal Highway Adminis- tration, United States Department of Transportation (Advisory and non-voting member m. State Planning Officer, North Carolina Department of Administration (Advisory and non-voting member) n. Airport Manager, Raleigh-Durham Airport (Advisory and non-voting member) page 6 of 9 1. o. Representative of the Assistant Secretary for Planning, North Carolina Department of Transportation (Advisory and non-voting member) R. Transit Representative, Duke Power Company (Advisory and non-voting member) The Technical Coordinating Committee shall meet when it is deemed appropriate and advisable and at least op.ce—quantexly. On the basis of majority vote of its membership, the Technical Coordinating Committee may appoint a member of the Committee to act as Chairman with the responsibility for coordination of the Committee's activities. 8. Airevised Operations Plan for continuing Transpor- tation Planning for the Durham Urban Area was pre- pared in April, 1974, under the direction of the Technical Coordinating Committee. The Operations Plan sets forth in detail the organization, agency responsibilities, work tasks, and financing required for maintaining a continuing comprehensive Transpor- tation Planning Process. The Technical Coordinating Committee will be responsible for maintaining the Operations Plan on a continuing and current basis and advisingotheisTrpsportation Advisory Committee and policy any significant changes that aTe required in agency responsibilities as they occur. 9. AlUnified Work Program for Intermodal Planning will be prepared annually which sets forth the transpor- tation and implementation activities which are to be carried out during the subsequent study year. The City of Durham Traffic Engineering Division shall be the lead agency responsible for the annual pre- paration of the Unified Work Program under the direction and supervision of the Technical Coordinating Committee. The Transportation Advisory Committee will have the responsibility for annual review and approval of the Unified Work Program. 10. An annual report will be prepared each year which priovides a brief summary of the continuing trans- portation planning activities and project imple- mentations that were accomplished during the pre- ceding year and outlines the current short range capital improvements program of transportation projects. The City of Durham Traffic Engineering Div- ision shall be the lead agency responsible for the pre- paration of the annual report under the direction page 7 of 9 and supervision of the Technical Coordinating Cemmittee. Copies of the annual report will be made available to local citizens. 11. The Policy Boards, the City of Durham Planning and Zoning Commission, and the County of Durham Planning and Zoning Commission as elected and appointed representatives of the people shall serve as the primary means for citizen input to the continuing transportation planning process. During transportation plan reevaluation, citizen involvement in the planning process shall be en- couraged during reanalysis of goals and objectives and'plan formation. This citizen involvement will be obtained through goals and objectives surveys, neighborhood forums, and public hearings in accordance with procedures outlined in the Operations Plan. Section 2. It is further agreed that the subscribing agencies will have the following responsibilities, these re- sponsibilities being those most logically assumed by the several agencies: City of Durham The City will maintain required inventories of socio- economic data, parking, transit, traffic, major streets and traffic control devices; cooperate with other participating 1 agencies in the periodic reevaluation of the transportation plan by providing needed projections of socio-economic data and periodically reevaluating central business area parking needs, the transit plan, and the transportation goals and objectives of its citizens; coordinate zoning and subdivision approvals till accordance with the transportation plan; and periodically reevaluate its administrative processes, finan- cial administrative abilities , and its laws and ordinances, all in regards to the transportation plan for that portion of the planning area under the planning jurisdiction of the City. 1 • i Durham County The Cou)ity will maintain required inventories of socio- economic data; cooperate with other participating agencies in the periodic,reevaluation of the transportation plan by co- operating in;the projections of socio-economic data and re- evaluation of area transportation goals and objectives; co- ordinate zoning and subdivision approvals in accordance with the transportation plan; and periodically reevaluate its ad- ministrative 1processes and laws and ordinances, all in regards to the transportation plan for that portion of the planning area under the planning jurisdiction of the County. - page B of 9 North Carolina Board of Transportation The Board will maintain required inventories of traffic accidents, traffic, and major roads and highways and traffic control devices on the State High-way' bystem; provide financial and technical assistance in the periodic cooperative reevalua- tion of the transportation plan on a cost-sharing basis in accordance With Chapter 136, Article 3A, Section 136-66.2(a) North Carolina General Statutes; and to the fullest extent possible and as permitted by existing State and Federal regulations; will provide assistance in the protection of necessary rights-of-way for those thoroughfares designated in the transportation plan to be a State responsibility. Section 3. Parties to this Memorandum of Understanding may terminate their participation in the continuing transpor- tation planning process by giving 30 days written notice to the other parties prior to the date of termination. Section 4. In witness whereof, the parties of this Memorandum of-Understanding have been authorized by approp- riate and proper resolutions to sign the same, the City of Durham by its Moms, Durham County by its Chairman, and the Board of Transportation by its State Highway Administrator, this day of ' , 1974. ATTEST (Seal) CITY OF DURHAM By ler MaTeT 4-14(0-06-A_ (Seal) COUNTY OF DURHAM By Clerk Chairman (Seal) NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF TRANSPORTATION By State Highway AdministratOr . • • _page 9 of 9 4 r Approved as to Form and Legality , — ----751MTZITY-Attorney .ttorney, enera o lort Carolina By Durham liaiTE Attorney Asst. Attorney General I [ . . ?-. • . . . „ — ,...... W ii.; E ,...0- % . c . f 1> ; , 1 ..\ 4,E • ... al 2- -..,,, .... 13 in. „,..s., No 0, a t g i- z § • 1- 0 _ .: x.• , • 5 46('. g I 2, .---1" .- ..) - , 11.. loW 1 .1..... 2 ottv, • . - :,....... t . i 1 2... ' c •- 1 ' , •'".'.. '".. '.•.. ,•,"•.' 1 1 I .P • --.... • .'4.:;•._v.-- ., .., t ) LN -...,....... ... . , Er • •gfr . 0 .-. 1 ... T ,, ii: iv GE , • . . - ... .:.4t..,, , ,.. ) 1. fir ... .;.r '...t.e•:-...' .'...,,..,.. ,. . t-. \ '--,==-/.1".:';,,,'-'7—'- . ':a ...I..r.'' .:',". 4 a 47 ' ;".... C3 ':.: ...t5.:,:r.f''');,!e;-.':.','.'"7:.-:S.:':;,, . i ..9. •,.; , . . . .,. , .,,. "."."*.•...., 5.Z.0' ' —., ., .,. , ... '42 ';',..,,',...",.ipo •%:',.. .,.':::-.::,....:: , 2\-?......-1 .1 ...,,•:: ,-, - r-. L: .11 .: . -•zi...,.:011.:'..'% +"'"e".:.!'r:'57:• a 53•tr -N. • , .. , CZJ"t3 . . "'...-,.'a. ...'... ,c.m a a - z.... ,,,, G „ :• ., ..:7...:- ,' " R i 517, = 'il ;,,--E' e'''4,-5.-"-irg, ,=-7f.'' z . % - .. ":•••. z•-"-P':. :: ,Jt 9 ,g . ' - ...n!';',,g-;-i"„i.', t -.:,..1:7; r.i - .',:-;:'':.'s. g--- Re ''''.4.--‘,..,•-•.- r1,:., .71,... i , • .,,...„, ,' .-;-•-; 2 . 13 e., ..4=13 .,',-;?, 2 a,'',..',',..--,g,c.--.-,'ifi'-' 0,...,,,,,_ ...,....., -. _ „..,--,:-._.:,„(-; .,... Z"A.4 :^4"-6. . "*"*"' '4. .,:. -...,Tmi - -.-•:-!:-.- ,74 F. ,-----.,.c.._1 c, '1--'r cier . -:,' .-.= zr,,g, 1 4,ea..,.. 4_7_,W.... •••■C. lek Fr''''',,.... VA' r o , _ a ' . c4,- ■ " t ^A\ / --.., • =3 .,A. lm .... gg c) e''-' la ,,,....-- . . i E \ ,,., , ....A,,, ..*:. ,.. .• = '. tog.("''''''', ) %•■•••0). IY. .,.-r /c4,--", ,-;-....„ r, • ..,.. . .. cr•"<' k ..ri•:,„ \ -±- • re, Int" a:a 1 "4 '''.‹ .':'-I. C „, I, / I -a ? '., ./ r.. ...rs .,... ../.., N ;...,..:641,;;, r.to. ..... ; r, -L-.....„, > ..;,...c:" -...?„;ir, ••>> . s> ;<' ' q s. ) i \ 1,g ' 4,-,....,•;&-,-; ..,..t..4. 4-1 er(/*/\ In. / .... a ,, , rt / . ,,f1 , .71'. .‘!„.'zr ; ) - .4.4...". -•4"..,;:,;...!- ... , 1,..., 2 /- ,, , \ ..z.- „:4-;,*--•g=:::::;,,z,;:t;',..•.:::-,•-- • 3.. II- f Za, ji, 1 = ,C5V"#`•- .“.• - ,.. ...,• . 0 to. IC!, \‘...,\(:;4.644) ' ,';',:,..".' ',NT; • \ .'.1...., CV cf 5:-1 .....-..2.....-.. '\ e■0S . -,:'c.,-. .1-•- -:-.--,-.: -4 \ .C. .,- a 1 --..,,.. rill. 44,-47. ., . :,,.,r.. ..„,,„1"-c,v1,'ril.<;., \ 0 -0 \ \ ...., A.,..,...„ \ - ... ..... v ' ---..__ 1 • >>-,. . ..:;:-,..+‘, :4',- • .-..:(,.. .^• f AT. v> ,.,.,`4 1 ; i.,,. CI a". '• •-:,ft.,::-r-1- -.' ',.., • .'::-.* - * \, ,-, .._.... ... . .. rm. L • Op 2 • .. e .c...> s co,a >---;•--..: 1 „ F ~ A2..0.- z.• A \ 4 ,, ii-- .) 22.C\ § ••,„-7 0 ‘11) g• cu . i I ..........1 f ,.,,..,E ,.--,..4 a ,,,t;„.:. ...12 5iti Z 17 ,.„. .,,..,.. 0- s ‘.... \ :ks Q, 7 •••. X "1 ‘, '/*4 cr- d . . — :- - — ' . . . ) . - . . ORANGE mum. COMMISSIONERS- °oriomanenua D/7 MEETING DATE December 14, 1982 Subject: Community-Based Alternatives Supplemental Funds I° --_--_' . Public Heating: ' es A no / A` ac=='"`*/; Information Contact: Manager's Office phone Nuriber:• 732-8181 ext 501 ,"""G"; To °"^." r use to be made of the funds offerred by the State.NEED: ^"° funds, as they are called, each to provide alternative group home settings for status offenders (such as for run away youth', and unruly) and juvenile delinquents. The County has four group homes which operate for these channeled is In addition to the $44,869 received for FY 1982-83 $5,782 is being offerred. County resPonsibility lies in (1) matching the amount on at least a 70/30% basis and (2) defermining the use to be made of the funds to maximize results. The --- Services Advisory Task Force has reviewed —' l from agencies cur- , receiving the funds and recommends supplemental distribution as follows: Sheaf er House $2,170 for maintenance, repairs and security deposits / Janus House 1,282 liaison worker and business space Tree noom 1,777 weekend counsellor and maintenance Phillips Project 553 trainino component $5,782 It states this would permit full funding of the 1982 requests made by the four IMPACT: Matching th County share is no problem in any of the fnu, cn a 30 percent /n County funds is being contributed toward Sheaffer as more than and Phillip� Project, Janus House and Tree House have in-kind Ho»'e operation to match the supplemental funds in lieu of cash. -mn« o«opmrt sufficient RECOMMENDATION: Approve as recommended. ORANGE COUNTY 0�[ BOARD OF cmMoSszomEms Action Agenda � acoaom AGENDA vr^M ABSTRACT Item No'__ /� MEETING DATE December 14, 1982 Subject: Vehicle Replacement 1oepartment: County--------- ---� | |Public Hearing: yes y � no ` Information Contact: �� �a - � �} : Yes Manager's Office Phone Number: 732'8181 ext 501 PUo*mCSE, To consider authorizing additional replacements for law enforcement operations within the 1902-83 budget year. NEED: The police services plan being instituted for the County by the new Sheriff calls for more emphasis being placed on patrol and responsiveness to calls for service. Besides having the effect of placing more personnel in the field during each shift there is increased demand for Sheriff vehicles being in nood operating condition. An obstacle to this is the advanced age and mileage of the 15 current vehicles which was only partly alleviated by the replacement of 4 units planned under the 1982-83 budget. The need exists for replacing more than the 4 units, because of condition, and raising the total available vehicles to 19: 9 for patrol - 7 regular manning and 2 for extra coverage on non-court days 3 for supervisory personnel 2 for civil process 2 for back-up for downtime 1 for van for prisoner transport 2 for ABC enforcement The Sheriff makes the following proposal to do this: 1. Dispose of the 3 court-confiscated vehicles and accept the 2 ABC units, 2. Replace vehicles number 2, 5, 6 and 7 with the capital funds budgeted for replacement. These units will have mileage exceeding the criterion amount by the time the new units are delivered in March 1983. Retain 2 of the older units for back-up. 3. Replace vehicles number 8, 9, 10 and 15 (respective odometer readings are 99,676, 107,478, 94,521 , 120`168) now by securing 4 used highway patrol units. Cost would be $3,000 each for 1979 Chevrolet 4 door Impala units with 60,000 to 65,000 miles. See Sheriff memo of December 8. The effect of the changes would be to increase the fleet to the desired number (19), eliminate high-cost confiscated units and upgrade 8 existing units. IMPACT' Cost would be S12,000 for the used Highway Patrol units. Part of this cost IMPACT: would be offset by the salvage value of the units replucnd. Operating cost should not be greater on the 4 units' However an unknown factor is the effect of increased total miles that will be driven by all Sheriff vehicles stemming from the increased emphasis on patrol. Some of the cost will be mitigated by the Sheriff's willingness to rotate the cars being driven. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the purchase of the 4 Highway Patrol units with source funds to come from transfer from the contingency account and salvage value proceeds to be credited back to that account. 041 M E M O R A N D U M To: Mr. Ken Thompson From: Lindy Pendergrass Re: Purchase of used NC Highway Patrol Cars Date: December 8, 1982 Mr. Thompson, per our conversation on purchasing: used patrol cars, I have checked the following procedures out on purchase. Orange County Sheriff's Department can purchase used patrol cars with no difficulty. The purchase price and condition of cars are as follows: 1. Used 1979 Chevrolet 4 dr. Impala police package cars with 65,000 miles $2,500.00 per car. 2. Used 1979 Chevrolet 4 dr. Impala with 60,000 miles to 65,000 are $3,000.00 per car. Mr. O'Neal has four cars with 61,000 miles to 62,500 that we can purchase. I personally looked at the maintenance sheets and looked at the cars and find them in good condition. Proposal: 1. These vehicles would be used by myself, Major Truelove and our investigators (the former Sheriff's car is now on patrol used by our supervisors) . 2. The two 1981 Plymouth patrol cars used presently by our investigators would be put on patrol. The two 81 Plymouths have 55,237.0 to 63,929.6 miles each and are in good condi- tion. 3. We would take four of our 1977 Fords in poor condition off the line and hopefully sell them as soon as possible at the auction to recoup part of the cost of the purchase of the used patrol cars. We will also take off the line three other vehicles that will not be used by our department. Keeping these three would cost the county far more than their use under any circumstances would warrant. U4'K- Page 2 Mr. Ken Thompson Purchase of Patrol cars December 8, 1982 Listed below are the cars that will be taken off the line. 1. 99,676.0 miles 1977 Ford 2. 107,478.3 1977 Ford 3. 94,521.6 1977 Ford 4. 120,168.5 1977 Ford T. 112,112.0 Thunderbird 1965 6. 100,000 + El-Camino 1974 7. 100,000 + Chev. Van 1970 I would also like to point out that we are lucky to get any cars from Mr. OINeal due to a lot of Sheriffs and Police Departments buying so many, ex: Hyde County (5) and Vance County (4) . I look forward to discussing this further should we need before December 14 meeting with the Commissioners. Total cost not to exceed $12,000. o4 ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. CAR N MILES 0 1 Fond (GAeen) 7611 0 2 Fond (GAeen) ' 84301.7 N 3 Fw d (BeigeJ 52269.0 0 4 Fond (Htue) 54528.8 0 5 Ptymouth (Beige) 55237,0 0 6 Ptymouth (Beige) 63929,0 0 7 FaiAmont (YeZtowJ 79411.3 0 8 Fond (White) 99676.0 0 9 Fond (White) 107,418.0 0 10 -Fond (Gnay) 94521.3 0 12 Chet,. Van 1010.5 0 13 FaiAmont (Btue) 58073,3 0 14 FaiAmont (white) 43046.0 0 15 Fond (Stue) 120,768.0 0 19 Fond (ThundeAbiAd) 112,112.0 . • . ORANGE COUNT/ BOARD OF CCHNISSIONEES Action Agenda ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Item N . b -C3 MEETING DATE December 14, 1982 . Subject: Proposed Alcohol Beverage Control Enforcement IDepartment: County anager 1 I public Hearing: yes X no j Attachment(s): ! Information Contact: Yes ! Manager' Office . Phone Number: 132-8181 ext 501 PURPG6E: To consid4r approving an agreement between the ABC Board,the County, and the Sheriff whereby the County would provide ABC law enforcement as a contract service of the Sheriff Department, NEED: Authoriza ion for such contracting is conferred by North Carolina General Statute C apter 188. Discussions between the ABC Board and Sheriff have resulted in terms and a cost-for-service amount being agreed upon. The amount as umes transfer of 3 positions, 2 vehicles, and equipment which would be returned to the ABC were the agreement cancelled by either party. Initial contracting period is proposed for six months with annual renewals thereafter to coincide with the fiscal year, IMPACT: Proposed payment for the enforcement is $52,800. Attached budget, compiled by the Finance Department,verifies that actual cost would match the sum proposed with no margin for any unforeseen expenses. Budgeting nd auditing, if the agreement is approved, would be by means of separate a count codes from the Sheriff's regular chart of accounts to avoid co-minglin problems. RECOMMENDATION: Approve attached agreement which has been revised by the County Attorney and authorize he Chairman to sign. The ABC Board further and in addition to the funds to be paid herein agrees to replace the existing cars (vehicles) owned by it (See Exhibit "B" attached) with two new cars (vehicles) every three (3) years or when needed. 2. 1 The Sheriff shall provide ABC law enforcement within Orange 1 County and shall report at least monthly to the ABC Board on ABC law enforcement itetivities. The law enforcement program to be provided is detailed in Exhibit "Ai' attached. 3.1 The Sheriff shall be solely responsible for hiring, equipping and supervising ttie officer or officers who are charged with the duty of enforcing the ABC lairs, and the Sheriff agrees to indemnify, and hold harmless, to the extent of insurance coverage provided by the Agency, the ABC Board for any liability arising from the activities of said officers. (Including indemnification for liability for accidents and civil liability involving Orange County ABC vehicles, to the extent oflinsurance coverage provided by the Agency). 4. The Sheriff shall give priority to specific requests from the ABC Board for as1istance in such matters as ABC store security, protection of ABC store deposits', and the investigation of internal and external theft. 1 5. This contract shall continue in effect until such time as any party desires to cancel the contract and gives 30 days written notice of cancellation to 1 each other party. (See Exhibit "A" attached.) 8. That upon the proper termination of this Agreement, the Sheriff and the Age*, will return to the ABC Board any equipment transferred pursuant to this contrict in good order, save and except normal wear and tear. (See Exhibit "B" attached.) This contract shall be effective the first day of January, 1983 and unless sooner terminated or extended shall terminate the 30th day of June, 1983. 1 ^ , • s / ^� ^ | 12/3/82 - Budget Estimate ABC Law Enforceme t Line item 12 Month Salaries $39,248 Longevity 800 Retirement ' 2,433 SS 2,630 Med. ins. 1,168 Auto expense 5,000 Insurance ' 800 Equipment repair (3 mobiles, 4 *alhie talkies) 700 Undercover Expense 1,000 Total $53,779 ABC Bd. ' (52.800) 979 Court Reimbursement -(1,00n0' $( 21) ' | - .. . STATE OF NORTH CARIOLINA COUNTY OF ORANGE CONTRACT FOR ABC LAW ENFORCEMENT THIS CONTRACT is entered into on this the 1st day of December , 1982, by and between the ORANGE COUNTY ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD , ABC Board (hereinafter "ABC Board") and the ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT (hereinafter "Agency") for the purposes set forth below: WHEREAS, N,crth Carolina General Statute Chapter 188 requires that the ABC Board either hire an ABC law enforcement officer or contract for ABC Law enforcement with a local law enforcement agency; and WHEREAS, t1le Board is required by law to expend at least five percent (Si) of profits for ABC law enforcement; and WHEREAS, the ABC Board is of the opinion that contracting with the Agency for ABC law enforcement would constitute the most efficient use of its ABC law enforcement funds; and WHEREAS, the Agency agrees to provide ABC law enforcement in ORANGE COUNTY in return for the agreed funding; (County or Municipality) NOW, THEREARE, IT IS AGREED that 1 1. The Ageicy shall provide ABC law enforcement in Orange County in return for the sem of $52,800.00 annually, to be paid in equal monthly payments I of $4,400.00 each month. This amount shall be adjusted as needed to equal the I amount required by North Carolina General Statute 18-8-905(e) (2) to be expended on ABC law enforcement. A. The ABC Board agrees to replace the existing cars (vehicles) with two new cars (vehicles) every three (3) years or when needed. . . I 1 2. The Agency shall provide ABC law enforcement within the county of ORANGE, NORTH CAROLINA • , and it shall report at least monthly to the ABC Board on its ABC law enforcement activities. 3. The Agency shall be solely responsible for hiring, equiping and supervising the officer or officers who are charged with the duty of enforcing the ABC laws, and the Agency agrees to indemnify, and hold harmless, the ABC Board for i any liability arising from the activities of said officers. (Including assuming all liability for eny and all accidents and civil liability involving Orange County ABC vehicles, and Will provide liability insurance for said vehicles). 1 4. The Agi cy shall give priority to specific requests from the ABC Board for assistance in such matters as ABC' store security, protection of ABC store deposits, and the 'Iinvestigation of internal and external theft. 5. This contract shall continue in effect until such time as either party desires to cancel the contract and gives notice of cancellation as set forth below. (See Exhibit "A" atached hereto and made a part of this Agreement) . 6.. This contract may be cancelled by either party upon 30 days notice to the other party, which notice shall be given in writing. 7. That upon proper termination of this Agreement, the Sheriff will return to the ABC Board any equipment transferred to him or purchased by him for his Agency with funds furnished by the ABC Board, pursuant to this Agreement in good order, save and except normal wear and tear. (See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement). Effective the first day of January, 1983 and ending the 30th day of June, 1983. Orange County ABC Board By: Agency Oran.e Count ..Sheriff's ©e•artment �!= -G �'` ,�-! =� Sheriff - , • EXHIBIT "A' CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT BEZiEEN ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT AND ORANGE COUNTY ABC BOARD 1 The Orange County Sheriff's Department will provide the Orange County Alcohol BeveragelControl Board a comprehensive enforcement program which includes tile following: I 1. Al]. personnel in the Orange County Sheriff's Department will be instruct?d as to their responsibility for ABC enforcement, 2. Al]. personnel will be aware they are responsible for and will act on any violation occurring in their presence and will act accordingly on any information concerning violations brought to theirlattention by citizens or other means. 3. All Orange County Sheriff's Department personnel will be in- structed!in North Carolina General. Statutes Chapter 18, Orange County Okdinances pertaining to ABC violations and Orange County ABC Board policy. 4. ABC operations such as undercover operations surveillance of - illegal til.1 operations will be the responsibility of the Sheriff's Department- i 5. Al]. perTnel on patrol, uniform and non-uniform will be in- structed to check Orange County ABC stores for any violations occurring on the lots - drinking on the premises, under age purchases, public intoxication, rowdiness, etc. The Sheriff's Department district system will provide this coverage on a 24-hour basis. i 6. PersonneL will be 'available and accessible to Orange County citizens for any ABC complaints on a 24-hour basis and will respond accordingly. I , 7. Personnei will be directed to check all businesses which have ABC licerises to insure proper compliance. 1 1 8, Money es orts will be available for ABC outlet stores. 9. The Sher ff's Department will present to the ABC Board an 1 annual f4nancial report of ABC Funds expended within 30 days of the end of each contract period. The Orange Count4 Alcohol Beverage Control Board would not under any circumstances lose its control in enforcement policy. Orange County_ Sheri f's Department, by Orange County ABC Board, by Sheriff 1 , . .. I . . _ • . . ' EXHIBIT "B" CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT AND ORANGE COUNTY ABC BOARD ' EQUIPMENT TRANSFE : Transfer Tit e .of Two Cars 2 1982 Chevrolet Automobiles (1) 1982 Chevrolet - 4 Door 2 GIAL69LOC1191822 (1) 1982 Cherrolet - 4 Door 2 GIAL69L8C1192622 4 Emergency Flashing Blue Lights 2 Blue Lights Under Grill 3 Radios - Purchased in 1973 4 Handle-Talkie Radios: Serial 1(416J8T - Purchased in 1973 Serial 4M1P9T - Purchased in 1973 Serial MINOT - Purchased in 1973 Serial 4M16.77T - Purchased in 1973 6 Handie-Talkie Electric Chargers: 1 Approki4tely 20 Years Old - For Old Type Talkie 1 Purchased in 1971 For Old Talkie 4 Purchased in 1973 for New Talkies (NLN 6804A, HT220 Omni. Only Number Visible) 4 Handie-Ta4ie Leather Carrying Cases: 4 For New Talkies 1 Motorola Base Unit (Transmitter 4 Receiver Unit in Office) Serial 4MA086W 3 Bullet-Prof Vest - Purchased May 1978 1 Varoscanner: Make - Federal - Purchased 1973 - 13 Volt Transformer Model: 6,000 - Serial 48-139, CRL 1200 Power Pack E. Cigarette Lighter Attachment I 4 Carrying Cases For Chemical Mace Tubes 4 Tubes of Chemical Mace 7 Holsters 1r 38 Caliber Pistols 1 Tear Gas lenade Launcher - Fits on End of Shot Gun Barrel' I 3 Shotguns (Riot Guns) Remington - 12 Gauge Serial 11218989V - Model 1870 Serial 112i8900V - Model 0870 Serial 41218932V - Model 4870 1 3 Shotgun Carrying Cases (Poor Condition) 3 Pistols: 3Eti Caliber Colt Detective Special Serial 4812755 - Purchased 1965 Serial 0749479 - Purchased 1960 Serial 4748577 - Purchased 1960 . . . . ' • ..„. - . -2- Inventory Contin ad: 7 Pistols: 3 Caliber Smith a Wesson, Combat Master Piece, Model 15 Serial 03143484 - Purchased April 19, 1982 Serial M3K3045 - Purchased April 10, 1972 Serial #1K6457 . Serial #3K75861 - Purchased January 19, 1974 Serial #3KF5723 - Purchased January 19, 1974 Serial 43K73830 - Purchased January 19, 1974 Serial #3K55044 - Purchased January 19, 1974 2 Riot Helmets 2 Gas Masks 9 Handcuffs: 1Smith & Wesson Serial #83771 Serial #015633 - Purchased January 11, 1973 Serial #582097 Serial, #015607 - Purchased January 11, 1973 Serial #83915 Serial #015676 - Purchased January 11, 1973 Serial #550100 Serial #946430 - Purchased January 11, 1973 Serial #015614 - Purchased January 11, 1973 1 1. Binoculars; 1 Bushnell Rangemaster, 7X, 35MM (No Serial Number Visible) 3 Cameras: 1 Nikkormat - Serial #FT3178014 - 35 MM (Purchased Approx. 1968) 1 Graflex 22 (Broken) 1 Polaroid I- Land Camera #360, Electronic Flash 1 Finger Pririt Pad - (Purchased May 1978) 2 Desk - 1 WCoden - 1 Metal 1 Monarch Staple Gun 1 Scotch Tape I Roll. Holder 1 Keymatic ?tone File 1 Manual. Royal Typewriter 2 Metal File Cabinets . 1 Wooden Cabinet (Approximately 4 x 4 x 1) 1 Finger Pri t Ink Roller 1 Swivel. Typ Metal Chair _ 1 Diamond Pencil Glass Marker 1, Proof & Tralllies cales Thermometer 1 Poison Liqu6r Test Set 1 Remote Contkol Telephone Radio - Model PCB-747-80 Serial #SN81-529231 - Purchased 1981 1 Orange County ABC Board, by 11 -,-- • a a- 4.0: 0.1-. by -.1=--i --;-Chairiram J _ . . . . . . _ . . . . ' ORANGE COUNTY U�� EOmRDorCOMMISSIONERS Action Agenda uCTIOuaCEmDA rrEm ABSTRACT Item No.DfD MEETING oxzEDecembor 14, 1982 Subject: Sheriff Department Hiring Request Public Hearing: yes . l uo : |o=paztoent, County Manager |� . Information Contact: Manager's Office 732-8181 ext 501 7�2 Phone Number: - eopposo' To consider authorizing a hiring request that varies from the County Personnel Ordinance provision relating to hiring o f family members. Th e Sheriff has requested the hiring of a deputy who is the son of one of the NEED: full-time matmns The Personnel Ordinance Article VIII, Section 8 places a limitation on the employment of relatives. It states that ''nmrej than nne mem br e of an immediate family will not be employed at the same time if such employment his immediate family," While the provision would result in an employee directly or indirectly superv`��no a member visinn does not totally pre- clude the hiring of family members within a department, County personne practice has been to discourage such practice. Therefore the Manager dis- approved the hiring request. In accordance with General Statute l53A-103 a Sheriff has an appeal right to the Board of Commissioners which he is exercising by this request. The Statute states: Each Sheriff and Register of Deeds elected by the people has the exclusive right to hire, discharge, and sumervise the employees in his office. However, the Board of Commissioners must approve the appointment by such an officer of a relative Y b blood or marriage of nearer kinship than first cousin or of a person who has been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude. RECOMMENDATION: As the Board decides. CCZJ 'r ij 4 L BOARD OF CSSIONS item r.0. - AcrioN AGE_ATak ITE-7-11‘BSTRACE hEITING DATE 12-14-82 SubjeCt:Moratorium On Major Subdivisions In University Lake and Upper Eno Watersheds Depart:cent: Board of Commissioners Public H=Pring: yes no Attadlannt(S): NONE In:fon-a-tic:In Contact: Don Willhoit 141131152NUE*-er: 732-8181 EXT. 510 ---- -77111KSE: Clarification of Board Action On Major Subdivision Moratorium In Designated Watersheds, NEED: At their August 24, 1981 meeting the Board placed a moratorium on subdivision activity in University Lake Watershed until the Water Resources Task Force Report was reviewed and the recommen- dations acted upon, The Board extended the moratorium to the Upper Eno Watershed on November 17, 1981. In March, 1982 the Board held a work session to review the Water Task Force Report. Following this review, the Board modified the moratorium to allow subdivisions where the smallest parcel created was at least five acres since the Report was not recommending minimum lot sizes greater than this for any watershed area. On April 5, 1982 the Board further modified the moratorium to allow minor subdivisions (four lots or less) to be created in protected watershed areas. On July 6, 1952, the Board approved zoning amendments that imple- mented a number of recommendations in the Water Task Force Report. On August 23, 1982 the Board considered and adopted most of the reMaining watershed policy recommendations in the Report. The major recommendations on watershed policy and implemention regu- lations are now in place. LTC : If it was intended that the moratorium end after the Board's action on July 6, 1982, this was not clear to the Planning Staff. The Board might take official action to lift the moratorium. RECOMMENDATION: As the Board decides. 04 CRPE CCUN,'TY BO?RD COYMISSIONVS Action Pgs..r.d.e. Item (To. f ABSTRACT MEETING DATE December 14, 1982. Subject. PROPOSED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION • [Thepe..1.....:Ient: County Manager [Lublic Hearing: Yes Resolution Infc)- -1-al Ccrthace: Ken Thompson Phone timber: /J-- 2-8181 ext 501 PURPCEE: To consider authorizing the creation, composition, charge and funding for an economic development commission for the County. MED: Economic development has become a county-wide concern necessitating clear strategies and policies for the development to occur at a rate and be of a type that is deemed appropriate for current and long range growth. Establishing a Commission pursuant to State law (General Statute 158-8, Article 2) for such purpose is con- sidered to be the best mechanism to develop and implement these strategies and policies. Input has been gathered as to commission composition, range of functions and financing. The resulting resolution is recommended subject to any further refinement by the Board. In as much as it is proposed as a County economic development commission with municipal and chamber representation, adoption by the County is necessary for creation. The Towns and Chambers would need as follow-up to recommend their representatives on the Commission and contribute their pro-rata share to financing the Commission's operation. Lvi-17.11.C": Funding in the amount of $25,000 is set aside in the 1982-83 Orange County Budget for contribution towards the County's share. This will be more than adequate since start up operation will not be funded for a full budget year. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt attached resolution with appointments to be considered at a later date. U4r RESOLUTION CREATING THE ORANGE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION WHEREAS, economic development is a county-wide concern; and, WHEREAS, the Board County wishes to take an active with economic governments nt of Orange Cdinty address the problems of development efforts to directly and inderectunderemployment, uneven tax economic development in Orange County g' opportunities); and, base, uneven geographic distribution of job WHEREAS, it is deemed desirable to achieve the goal of increased economic development through clear and effective rate,strategies and which stimulate development of an appropriate balance to serve the public interest; and, WHEREAS, the establishment of an economic development commission would provide for the economic development functions and activities desired and provide a mechanism for representation of and continuous funding by the County, municipalities and business interests served by the Commission; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Commissioners of Orange County: THAT the Orange County Economic Development Commission be established undr andebepfurnishedta full time staffnandnfinancest ycle 2 for various econ m c development efforts; THAT the Commission: a) Carry out an economic development program for all portions of the County and its encompassed municipalities; b) Formulate projects in cooperation with local governments for carrying out such an economic development program to address the need for gainful employment and upgrading skill levels for current County residents as primary goals; c) Furnish advice and assistance to existing businesses wishing to alter or expand operations, to prospects desiring to ocate in the County, and to developers of office parks and shopping centers; d) Encourage stimulation of locally-owned enterprises, small businesses and farm operations, such as through local marketing of locally produced farm goods; e) Encourage policies that take account of scarcesnaturalnresources such as water, existing and proposed water supply wat , farlands, reflect overall development patterns; f) Conduct commercial and industrial surveys as needed; O4 g) Carry on such other activities as may be necessary in the proper exercise of the functions described herein; THAT the Commission be made up of nine (9) voting members who shall act as the Board of Directors to the Commission as follows: Four members appointed by the Board of Commissioners; one member each representing and recommended by the municipalities of Mebane, Hillsborough, Chapel Hill and Carrboro; and one member representing and recommended by the Chapel Hill-Carrboro and Hillsborough Chambers of Commerce. One of the Orange County positions should be reserved for a member of the Industrial Facilities and Pollution Control Authority in order to coordinate actions of the two organizations; THAT the voting members of the Commission shall serve staggered terms such that the initial appointments of one-third of the members shall be for one year, one-third for two year, and one-third for three year terms. The terms served initially by Orange County members shall be three years for one member, two years for one member and one year for two members. The Towns of Chapel Hill and Hillsborough members shall each serve a term of three years. The Towns of Mebane and Carrboro members shall each serve a term of two years. The representative of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro and Hillsborough Chambers of Commerce shall serve a term of one year. Following expiration of the initial terms served, the members may be considered for reappointment. All subsequent terms shall be for three years; THAT the Town Managers and County Manager be ex-officio, non-voting members of the Commission for coordination between governments; THAT the Commission, through its Chair who shall be elected by the Commission members as provided for in G.S. 158-9, will act in a supervisory capacity to the staff. The Commission shall set policy and guidelines for operations, assist recruitment, determine the type of liaison contact to be mounted, review the progress of the Commission, and adopt rules and regulations as necessary to perform its functions. The Commission shall meet regularly at least once every three months as provided for in G.S. 158-9, Both the Chair and County Manager shall be kept informed by staff of any major operational developments occurring between meetings of the Commission; THAT there be a budget for Commission, subject to the annual audit review for all expenditures. The Commission Chair and the County Manager shall serve as a personal committee to determine qualifications, hire, dismiss and fix the compensation of all personnel necessary to the functioning of the Commission, including the Director of the Commission. All employees of the Commission will be considered County employees subject to the Orange County Personnel Ordinance and fringe benefits applicable to all County employees; THAT the Commission may lease, rent or purchase or otherwise obtain suitable quarters and office space for its staff, and may lease, rent or purchase necessary furniture, fixtures and other equipment as provided for in G.S. 158-11; THAT the Commission Director also provide staff support to the Industrial Facilities and Pollution Control Authority and provide contact with all other agencies and groups which may now or in the future be involved in actions affecting economic development of Orange County; THAT the Commission receive, accept and disburse any funds and services made available by local governments and their agencies and by private and civic 04 sources in furtherance of its functions; THAT the initial annual budget not exceed $50,000 dollars and be provided through non-property tax funds and contributions. The prorated share of the funds for the Commission's budget shall be as follows: 56% from Orange County, 6% from each municipality and 20% combined amount from the Chapel Hill-Carrboro and Hillsborough Chambers of Commerce; THAT available funding' sources and project initiatives be designed and pursued through available financial resources such as those provided by the Industrial Facilities and Pollution Control Authority and the Federal-State Community Development Block Grant Small Cities Fund; THAT the Commission and staff work affirmatively with the County and municipal planning agencies and in particular to rely on what the agencies provide in such areas as: a) Planning Department and Planning Board surveys and plans which identify resources for and constraints to economic development; b) Zoning designed to identify potential industrial and commercial sites and protect them against types of development that would lessen their attractiveness or their compatibility with surrounding uses; c) Provision of adequate governmental facilities to serve industrial sites thus identified. THAT the Commission and staff work affirmatively with the Triangle J Council of Governments, the contemplated Foreign Trade Zone, the Research Triangle Park Foundation and the Department of Commerce; THAT this Resolution takes effect upon its passage, this the 14th day of .7 December, 1982. Signed by: / C -it of the Stand-of Gomm'issT'1ers Attest: wlt Clerk to the Board of Commissioners ORANE COUNTY BOARD OF CO>24ISSIONalS Aecioa Agenda AcrioN .T‘Ga\-a; ITE4 rasTmar TflG DATE December 14 18 Subject: Budget amendment Depart-rnt.: Finance Public Ilmring: yes y nr. Inaxmatica Contact: Patricia Stutts It4rielqtraaoar: 919 752-8181 Ex . 495 . _ PURPOSE: To consider proposed budget amendment. IUMD: General Fund 1) To budget for additional federal funds to be used for energy assistance. 2) To budget for service to be prbvided through the Orange County Sheriff's department for alcohol beverage control laws enforcement. IMPACT: General Fund 1) The Social Services' budgeted revenues and appropriation will increase by the amount of the federal grant. No county match is required. 2) Budgeted revenues and appropriations will increase in the Public Safety category by the amount of ABC Board and court reimbursement funds. No additional county funds are required. RECOMMENDATION:. Acceptance Revised Budget Amendment 12/14/82 Agenda Item D-13 ORANGE COUNTY PROPOSED 1932-83 BUDGET AMENDMENT The 1982-83 Budget Ordinance of Orange County as adopted on June 22, 1982, and subsequently amended, is hereby amended as follows: GENERAL FUND 1) Appropriation: Social. Services $ 29,454. Source: Social. Services - Energy Assistance Grant $ 29,454. To budget or additional federal funds for energy assistance. 2) Appropriation: • ABC Law Enfok.cement $ 26,900. • Source: ABC Board $ 26,400. Court Reimbursement 500. To budget for six months of ABC law enforcement service to be provided through Orange County Sheriff's department. Adopted this day of , 1982. ORANGE COUNTY PROPOSED 1982-83 BUDGET AMENDMENT The 1982-83 Budget Ordinance of Orange County as adopted on June 22, 1982, and subsequently amended, is hereby amended as follows: GENERAL FUND 1) Appropri4tion: Social Services $ 29,454. Source: Social Services - Energy Assistance Grant $ 291454. To budget for additional federal funds for energy assistance. 2) Appropriation: ABC Law Enforcement $ 53,800. Source: ABC Board $ 52,800. Court Reimbursement 1,000. To budget for ABC law enforcement service to be provided through Orange County Sheriff's department. -61) Adopted this day of A „. , 1982. • NORTH CAROLINA NOTICE ORANGE COUNTY On December 14, 1982 the Board of Commissioners of Orange County adopted a resolution to accept an offer made by John See lye, Hillsborough, North Carolina, for the purchase of a dwelling house located on property described below which is owned by Orange County. The terms of the offer are as follows; 1. Buyer will pay $10.00 to Orange County at closing. 2. Buyer will remove the dwelling house from the property described below within six months after closing. 3. Buyer will preserve the dwelling house upon a lot within the Historic District of Hillsborough, North Carolina. 4. Buyer will obtain a release in favor of Orange County from Annie 0. Riley from the lease she holds upon the property, which lease is recorded in Book 165, Page 242, Orange County Registry. The Board of Commissioners will accept the offer of Mr. See lye unless some other person upsets the offer contained in paragrapahs 1 through 4 above by offering, in writing, to purchase the dwelling house for an amount not less than ten percent (10%) more than the amount stated in numbered paragraph 1 above and by offering, in writing, to meet each of the conditions contained in numbered paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 above. The upset offer, to be consider d by the Board of Commissioners, must be filed with the Clerk to the Boar1 of Commissioners within ten (10) days of the date of publication of this notice accompanied by a cash deposit in the amount of five percent (5%) of the d Ilar amount offered. The dwelling to be sold and removed is located on property owned by Orang i County in the Town of Hillsborough, Orange County, North Carolina bowled N and bowled as follows: BEGINNIG at a stake, the Southwest corner of Lot No. 3 according to the plot of time Town of Hillsboro at a corner of open lane and Churton Street, running thence East with said lane 2-1/2 chs. to a stake; thence North 1 ch. to a stake; thence West 2-1/2 chs. to a stake in the West side of Churton Street; thence south with Churton Street to the beginning. There is excepted, however, from the above described tract a lot 20 feet by 80 feet on the North sid$ of said above described lot. Said excepted lot being now owned by the Orange County by virtue of deed from heirs of N. W. Brown. See deed from Sarah F. Webb (single) and Helen L. Webb (single) to party of the first part duly recorded in Deed Book 104, at page 278, Orange County Registry. This the day of December, 1982. Paulette Pridgen-Pond Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County To The Durham Morning Herald Please publish on December 24, 1982 and send proof of publication to Geoffrey E. Gledhill, 110 North Churton Street, Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278. 1 _ - - .„ NORTH CAROLINA ORANGE COUNTY 1-\A This Offer made this '1 ' day of 19 12-1- by and between JOHN D. SEELYE of 219 W. Queen Street, Hillsborough, North Carolina, hereinafter referred to am Buyer, and The County of Orange, hereinafter referred to as Seller. W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Seller holds title to a certain parcel of land in Hillsborough Township, iOrange County, North Carolina, described in Deed at Book 165, page 241, Orange County Registry; and 2 WHEREAS, Seller pursuant to North Carolina General Statutes § 160A-269 may • negotiate a sale to Buyer of the dwelling house located upon the said property, such sal. ▪ being subject to upset bid as by law provided; and • WHEREAS, Annie Obie Riley of Lawndale Drive, Hillsborough, North Carolina, herein- 3 after referred to as Lessee, holds a lifetime lease to the said real property and its Iappurtenances as recorded in Book 165, page 241, Orange County Registry; and 2 WHEREAS, Lessee is 98 years of age and entirely unable to manage herself and her 2 affairs, and care of Lessee's person and of her affairs has for many years been in the • hands of Lessee's daughter, nrs. Naomi Riley Bell; and O WHEREAS, said Lessee's daughter has granted an option to Buyer to buy Lessee's 0 2• interest in the said property and has agreed to deliver a recordable conveyance thereto O as guardian, if necessary; 0 NOW, THEREFORE, Buyer hereby offers to purchase the dwelling house located upon the 5• said parcel of land from Seller upon the following terms and conditions: 1. Buyer shall pay $10.00 to the Seller at closing. 2. Buyer shall remove the said dwelling house from the said property within six months after closing, 3. Buyer shall preserve the said dwelling house upon a lot within the Historic District of Hillsborough, North Carolina. .4 4, 4, Prior to closing Buyer shall obtain release in favor of Orange County from Annie O. Riley of the lease she holds upon the said property, as recorded in Book 165, page 242, Orange County Registry, IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, Buyer sets his pand and seal the day and year first above written. r"\A (SEAL) JOHR—D.. SEELYE The above offer is hereby accepted by the County of Orange, this day of 0 , 19 COUNTY OF ORANGE By: S 0 a z lii ci Iii 01 E. 0 b NORTH CAROLINA December 14, 19 82 Regular Meeting Resolution ORANGE COUNTY WHEREAS on December 9, 198 2 Orange County received a written offer from John Seelye for the purchase of a dwelling house located on property owned by Orange County; and WHEREAS a copy of the offer is attached to this resolution and is a part of it; and WHEREAS Orange County, by and through its Board of Commissioners regards the offer reasonable under all of the circumstances now known; It is therefore resolved that Orange County proposes to accept the offer of John Seelye upon the following conditions: L That he deposit 596 of the dollar amount offered with the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners. 2. That the Clerk cause a notice to be published containing the terms of the offer and the fact that the offer will be accepted unless, within ten (10) days of the date of publication, an upset bid is filed with the Clerk to the Board offering at least 10% more money for the dwelling and offering to meet each of the other conditions in the offer made by Mr. Seelye. Commissioner Marshall moved the adoption of the foregoing resolution. Commissioner Willhoit seconded the motion. Ayes: Commissioners Lloyd, Marshall, Walker, Whitted, Willhoit. Noes: - 0 :11 NORTH CA ROI.INA NOTICE ()RANGE t:OUNT`i On Dreemher 14, 198 2 the Board of Commissioners of Orange County adopted 11 resolution to accept an offer made by John Seelye, Hillsborough, North Carolina, for the purchase of a dwelling house located on property described below which is owned by Orange County. The terms of the offer are as follows: I. Buyer will pay $10.00 to Orange County at closing. 2. Buyer will remove the dwelling house from the properly described below within six months after closing. 3. Buyer will preserve the dwelling house upon a lot within the Historic District of Hillsborough, North Carolina. 4. Buyer will obtain a release in favor of Orange County from Annie 0. Riley from the lease she holds upon the property, which lease is recorded in Book 165, Page 242, Orange County Registry. The Board of Commissioners will accept the offer of Mr. Seclye unless some other person upsets the offer contained in paragrapahs 1 through 4 above by offering, in writing, to purchase the dwelling house for an amount not less than ten percent (10%) more than the amount stated in numbered paragraph 1 above and by offering, in writing, to meet each of the conditions contained in numbered paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 above. The upset offer, to he considered by the Board of Commissioners, must be filed with the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners within ten (10) days of the date of publication of this notice accompanied by a cash deposit in the amount of five percent (5%) of the dollar amount offered. The dwelling to be sold and removed is located on property owned . . (154 _ - • by Orange County in the Town of Hillsborough, Orange County, North Carolina and bounded as follows: BEGINNING at a stake, the Southwest corner of Lot No. 3 according to the plot of the Town of Hillsboro at a corner of open lane and Churton Street, running thence East with said lane 2-1/2 chs. to a stake; thence North 1 ch. to a stake; thence West 2-1/2 chs. to a stake in the West side of Churton Street; thence south with Churton Street to the beginning. There is excepted, however, from the above described tract a lot 20 feet by 80 feet on the North side of said above described lot. Said excepted lot being now owned by the Orange County by virtue of deed from heirs of N. W. Brown. See deed from Sarah F. Webb (single) and Helen L. Webb (single) to party of the first part duly recorded in Deed Book 104, at page 278, Orange County Registry. This the 11.-4(5-day of December, 1982. 'aulette Pridgen-P. . Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County To: The Chapel Hill Newspaper Please publish on December 23, 1982 and send proof of publication to Geoffrey E. Gledhill, 110 North Chiirton Street, Hillsborough, North Carolina 27273. • MAIZE CCXE,.71t BOARD OF COV.MISSIONalS Action Agenda IaN Item ACT AGENDA. ITal ABSTRACT =MT; DATE December 14, 1982 subject; Addition of Big Oak Drive and Meadow Road on the Pleasant Green Estates iubdivisiln to the atate-maintained system. cepluzeret: Plannin Hearing: Yes X, --iT1 Attadunant(5): a) Letter from Sam Jones 1 InfOrination. Contact: Susan Smith • to Manager dated 12/9/182; b) Secondary Road Addition Investigation Report Phalle 1Nkrabar: 732-8181 EXT. 359 PURPOSE: Petition from DOT for approval of the addition of Big Oak Drive and Meadow Road in Pleasant Green Estates subdivision to the state-maintained Secondary Road System. NEED: Addition of paved roads to State-maintained Secondary Road System. IMPACT: The Boar 's decision will be forwarded to the Board of Transportation for their,deliberation on acceptance of the road onto the state-maintained system. RECOMMENDATION: Approval • . I • I ir i \ ■, 40019?-4tb.. . .... „..ee. ,,,,.• ,-;r 'Zilir ■• -." ''''-v........se STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JAMES S.HUNT JR •GOVERNOR Graham, North Carolina 27253-0766 ENVISION OF HIGHWAYS WILLIAM R.ROBERSON.JR December 9, 1982 SECR.ETARY Orange County _a_ , ,T, Mr. Kerre....i B. 14..orspson, County Manager Orange County 1.06 East Margaret Lane Hillsborough, North.Carolina 27278 Subject: Petition for Addition .- Big Oak Drive and Meadow Road in Pleasant Green Estates Subdivision Dear Mr. Thompson: Attached is Form SR-4, Secondary Road Addition In- vestigap,on Report, for Big Oak Drive and Meadow Road in Pleasant Green Estates Subdivision. This is being forwarded to you for review by your County Board of Commissioners. Yours very truly, S.().‘4:1°1 ones DISTRICT ENGINEER 1 Ijbh Atte. cc: Mr J. W. Watkins .... .... _.. . ._ - • ' . ------ . ' _ ' — . � _ NORTH. | ` ' JM4 STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS / | SECONDARY ROAD ADDITION INVESTIGATION REPORT \--------' County orange | Co' File No. Date _______ Township �m | Div. File No. __ • � Local Name:;: o'. +° - ^." °''^° ','._—__—_— SuhdiviSion Name Pleasant oro9uE^tateo Length 0.2 and 6.05 Width ' 20 ' Type na Condition Good Is this a subdivision street subject to the construction requirements for such streets? Yes I Recorded 01—04-72 Book 19 Is this a subdivision street subject to participation paving? Page Number of homes Having entrances into road TideIt6J1.21,) • • Other uses having entrances into road None Does right-of-way: obtained meet present Division of Highways requirement? Yes If not, why? Is petition (WI) attached? Yes Is the County Commissioners' Approval `~^-~' attached? _ f not, why? i � Does the road meet present minimum Division of Highways construction requirements?. Yes If not, state wh4 is eeded to l the d in cc*ptable maintenance condition under Remarks and Recommendations. Is a map attachechindicating information for reference in locating eoad by the Planning Department? Yes Cost to place in acceptable maintenance condition: Total Cost $ 0,00 Grade, drain, stabilize $ , Drainage $ , Other Remarks and Recommendations ,Meets sinirmam regarementa. Recommend addition. Reviewed and approved • Reviewed and approved J. R. Watkins - ~°~o, ' '� ^°.' DIVISION ENGINEER DISTRICT ENC1lNEEK ' w~ --' -- ' (Do not write in this space - (Do For use of Secondary Roads Dept.) �-- at41 Petition Mo . ' I. \ ~ / j (Do not write in this space � � f~ For use of Planning Dept.) • ' '~ � | � -----' '/.� • uu ,if-lost ` � ' • | ' - i | � ORANE COUNTY BOARD CO CCt!PLISSIONERS Action Ac3anda /'7 ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Item No D-14- MEETING DATE December 14, 1982 Subject: [ Departrent:Recreation & Parks Department j Public earing: x yes • no] [ Attachment(s): Information Contact: James C. Hester, Jr. (1) Youth Involvement Resolution Phone NuMber: 732-9361, Ext. 294 -A Purpose: RecogniZe the Northern Orange County Youth Council, and other youthful participants for their endeavors to obtain a working knowledge of this governmental system. Need: There is a need to establish a positive attitude toward county and city!governments. 1; Impact: A greater learning of the knowledge of county government systems will be gained by the youth populace Of the Northern Orange County Youths. ;I RecomTendation(s)lf Accept the Resolution for recognition of the Northern Orange County Youth Council and other participants who are involved in Youth Involvement week. • ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Room No 12 106 Ens-r MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGH, N. C. 27278 RICHALO L IniaTED,Cu NORMAN GlISTAVISON swum,L mAL.saAu. I RESOLUTION NOIMAN WALKER ON CILLHOIT WHEREAS, The Northern Orange County Youth Council , sponsored by the Orange County! Recreation and Parks Department, supports the youth movement by regulating a week long program of youth involvement in county government; WHEREAS!, A greater knowledge of county government systems will be gained by the youp populace of the Northern Orange County Youths by way of: 1. Seeing firsthand the operation of local government; 2. ObtLining actual work experience; 3. Becoming more aware of the need for citizen participation in local government, 4. Estlablishing a positive attitude toward countyNand city goviernments, :11,f4.0y, •:,±4i:j4.641f1 5. EndourageAlptallinior_41-igOlid_hig4,,schooFstUllents to better,inder#anoceI4overnment;__ J j 4 6 Gain neW=.paitpte,,.-.,,:i. ar--frpshc.Idea.:5-9.F.veaList.,,,..iniy4problems; 7 Gain,inX1p .-4..nte "the problemsthat 6oRaeri00ii0Uth of :.;7! r ,z,izZcz.Vw( WHEREAS„1.,..tfigck taY6,axt.. .-74-77.q. 4EcIZ',':tii4r.4- 4,01,,,e15ent Week will, be better a4guainteilfet:hc-----rinsitrtitient.'pirOceciare,....t and aspects and shall hopefully lay a strong foundation for our future leaders in government; NOW, THEREFORE, Let it be known that the Orange County Board of Commissioners recognize the Northern Orange County Youth Council and other youthful participants for their endeavors to obtain a working knoWledge of this governmental system. APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 1962. Richard E. Whitted, Chairman Orange County Board of Commissioners