Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 11-01-1982 ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, NOVEM ER 1, 1982 10:00 A.M. COMMISSIONERS' ROOM ORANGE COUNTY COURTHOUSE HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA [ A. BOARD COMMENTS B. AUDIENCE DOMMENTS 1. Matters on the printed agenda 2. Matters not on the printed agenda C. MINUTES October 25, 1982 D. REPORT--Audit Presentation E. ITEMS FOR IBOARD DECISION 1. Preliminary Plan--John Hackney. Heirs Subdivision 2. PreliMinary Plan--John Blackwood Property 3. Reque t for Special Use Permit Modification--The Timbers 4. Propo ed Procedures on Land Use Plan Amendment Policy 5. Propo ed Amendments to Land Use Plan for Cheeks Township 6. Extension of Zoning into Cheeks Township 7. Board consideration of Planning Board By-Laws 8. Purchase of Sheriff's vehicles and Animal Control Truck 9. Purchase of Additional Mainframe Computer Equipment 10. Purchase of Front End Loader Refuse Truck 11. Appoi tments 12. Budget Amendments ) , - _ . - , INDEX NOVEMBER 1, 1982 SUBJECT I ACTION PAGE _... _ Minutes 10/25/82 deferred 1 Audit Presentation none 1 J.Hackney Heirs Sub. approved 1-2 J. Blackwood property .1 2 Sp. Use Per. d. The Timbers 11 2 LUP Amend. Pricedures ki 2 Proposed LUP Amend. for Cheeks Tabled till 11/16/82 2-3 Zon. into Cheeks pi 3 Planning Board by-laws changes suggested; to be returned I to BOG after P1 . Bd. examines 3 Sheriff's vehticles approved--Don Lacefield 3-4 Animal Control Vehicles " " n 4 Mainframe Com uter " Fulcrum 4-5 Front End Loa er rebid 5 Appointments Nursing Horn Ad. Council Clerk to contact members 5 Mental Heal, h Board Jan Pinney reappt'd 5 TYouth Need d Task Force M. Bramble, S. Tillis, L. , Reifsnyder, Robin Wells appt'd 5 -6 Com. Worn. E. Parker; M. Kemper appt'd 6 Hillsborough P1 . Bd. Ronald Wagner appt'd 6 Energy Com. Clerk to contact 6 Tri. J EMS Council Advertise 6 Budget Amendments Approved 6 Resolution Opposing changes to CDBG Program Adopted 6 Mental Health dinner Announced 6 Tour of new ell center it 6 L 1 , 751 068 MINUTES NOVEMBER 1, 1982 The Orange County Board of Commissioners met in regular session on Monday, November 1, 1982, at 10:00 A.M. in the Commissioners' Roam, Orange County Court- house, Hillsborough, North Carolina. Commissioners present: Chairman Richard E. Whitted, and Commissioners • Norman Gustaveson, Shirley E. Marshall, Norman Walker and Don Willhoit. A. BOARD COMMENTS Chairman Whitted said there were two addenda and an announcement; Com- missioner Marshall also added an announcement. B. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Mr. Ben Lloyd asked to address the Board on the question of proposed amendments to the Land Use Plan for Cheeks Township; Mr. Bernice Hackney asked to address the Board on the John Hackney Heirs Subdivision. There were no other audience comments. C, MINUTES The Minutes of the October 25, 1982, meeting were deferred until the tape could be checked, D. AUDIT PRESENTATION Mr. Wallace Harding presented the County's financial audit for the year ending June 30, 1982, to the Board; the audit was prepared by Touche Ross Com- pany whose representative was present. Mr, Harding said the information con- tained within the audit went beyond that required legally and by generally accepted audit practices. Mr. Nelson, of Touche Ross, said, responding to an inquiry from Chairman Whitted, that the goal for the audit presentation for 1983 is September 30, 1983. Commissioner Marshall suggested that the Department of Aging be listed as a Department rather than as the Commission on Aging. Commissioner Gustaveson said this was a good beginning of a sound historical financial document, • E. BOARD DECISIONS • 1, John Hackney Heirs Subdivision--preliminary plan: Mr. Cannity, Planning • Staff, made the presentation for the Planning Department, citing location and • that the subdivision meets minimum standards. Mr, Bernice Hackney asked that 0 • • 752. o39 the Board not require the Class C road be built through the property to the proposed five acre lot requested. Mr, Hackney explained that there were no subdivision plans for the property, that it is all for family use. Mr. Hackney is willing to have the 60' right-of--way, but asks that he not have to build the road. Mr. Hackney added that in order for the family to build individual homes on the property left to them, they have to either have deeds or go through the subdivision process. Commissioner Gustaveson moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, to approve the preliminary plan for the John Hackney Heirs Subdivision and asked that the Planning Department work with Mr. B. Hackney to draw up the two plats, as required under the Zoning Ordinance, with one plat reading that no building permits would be issued for this lot until the Class C road is constructed. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, 0. 2. John Blackwood Property-preliminary plan: Mr. Cannity made the pre- sentation for the Planning Staff, citing the location of the property and that it meets mininum standards for subdivision. Commissioner Gustaveson moved, seconded by Commissioner Walker, to approve the preliminary plan for the John Blackwood property. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, 0. 3. Special Use Permit Modification—The Timbers: Mr. Cannity told the Board the proposed modification would change the location of the swimming pool from the north side of the project to the south side. Commissioner Gustaveson moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, to approve the Class A Special Use Permit modification as requested for the Timbers. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, 0. 4. Land Use Plan Amendments Procedure Policy: Chairman Whitted said this policy had first been discussed at the Monday meeting of October 4th. Commis- sioner Gustaveson moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, to approve the Procedure Policy for Amending the Land Use Plan with inclusion of Staff recom- • mended language (see pages f-49 of this book for the policy). Vote: Ayes, • 5; noes, 0, • 5. Proposed Land Use Plan Amendments for Cheeks Township: Chairman Whitted • explained the procedure the Board follows after items have been to public hearing, • specifically addressing this issue, Commissioners Marshall and Willhoit noted • that the Board had not received the Planning Board Minutes of the meeting when •• 1. 7�Q. 070 its (the Planning Board's) recommendation on this issue was made. Accordingly, Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Walker, to table the proposed amendments to the Land Use Plan for Cheeks Township until the next meeting when the Planning Board Minutes would be available to the Commissioners. During the discussion following the motion, Board members suggested that the Planning Board Chair might be present at that meeting to provide guidance as to the reasoning process of the Planning Board, Mr. Lloyd said that with the motion to table his questions had been answered and he would not address the Board at this time, Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, O. 6. Extension of Zoning Into Cheeks: This item was tabled until the next meeting, pending the availability of the Planning Board Minutes. 7. Planning Board By-Laws Revision: Board members said they felt that Planning Board members should not abstain from voting unless a personal, financial interest was involved, Commissioner Gustaveson moved, seconded by Commissioner Walker, to approve the Planning Board's rewritten by-laws with-wording changed to reflect that members present but not voting should be recorded as having voted "Aye" and abstentions are not permitted, Both the motion and the second were later withdrawn. Board members indicated changes they would prefer be made to the By-Laws: 1) the Planning Director shall serve as Secretary to the Planning Board (he/she may appoint staff to serve that function but the responsibility is his/hers); 2) no abstentions are permitted unless a financial interest is involved (those not voting will be counted as "ayes" and the Chair should vote); the County Attorney • questioned whether the Article referring to "Amendments" was in conformance with • the Zoning Ordinance. The Board asked that these suggested changes be taken to • the Planning Board and returned to the Commissioners following the Planning Board's • review. The Commissioners suggested a short, ten minute discussion with the • Planning Board on November 22, 1982, regarding the voting/not voting/abstention • question, if necessary. • 8. Sheriff's Vehicles & Animal Control Truck Purchase,: Mr. Rees, Purchasing ▪ Officer, passed out the bid results for the Sheriff's Vehicles and the Animal • Control vehicle, Those results for the Sheriff's Vehicles are: 071 754 Unit Total Life Cycle Life Cycle,. Unit Cost Total Cost Cost Cost Don Lacefield Chevrolet $9,689,38 $38,757.52 $21,587.37 $86,349,48 ' Malibu Sedan Ray Motor Company $9,698.93 $38,795,72 $22,296.81 $89,187.24 LTD Sedan Commissioner Willhoit asked Mr. Rees what the vehicles would have cost if the , County had gone on State Contract for the vehicles; Mr. Rees replied that for the , State Contract the Malibu was $7,450 while the Ford LTD was $8,131, Commissioner Willhoit moved to reject the bids and to wait until 1983 to go , on State Contract for vehicle purchase. Motion died for lack of a second. Board members expressed disappointment that local dealers had been unable to , provide the same price for the County as provided for the State Contract. Commissioner , Gustaveson moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, to purchase the Sheriff's vehicles , from Don Lacefield Chevrolet as this'was the lowest responsible bid received. Vote , Ayes, 4 (Commissioners Gustaveson, Marshall, Walker and Whitted); noes, I (Commissioner Willhoit), The results of the bid for the animal control vehicle are: Unit Cost Life Cycle Cost ' Ray Motor Company $15,139.44 Ford F100 $8,052.61 Don Lacefield Chevrolet $14 454.72 ' Chevy C-10 $7,761,61 Ray Motor Company No Bid Cab & Chasis only No Bid Don Lacefield Chevrolet $14,054.72 Cab & Chasis only $7,361,61 Chevy C-10 Commissioner Gustaveson moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, to purchase the animal control vehicle from Don Lacefield Chevrolet as the lowest responsible ' bidder. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, 0. Commissioner Marshall asked the Manager if his office would contact the vendors regarding the reasons for the amounts they bid above the amounts on the State Contract, 9. Mainframe Computer Equipment: The bid results for this equipment are: Fulcrum, $163,497 less trade in allowance of $15,000; and, Shebesta Associates, $180,400 less trade in allowance of $20,000.. The totals are Fulcrum, $148,497 and Shebesta Associates, $160,400 for one Microdata Sequel with one megabyte memory & operating software, 40 open ports, 4 prism IV's, one streaming tape drive, one 600 LPM printer and 127 million bytes disc; with trade in of one Microdata Reality with • 755 072 , 96K memory, one 1600 BPT tape drive, one 300 LPM printer, 24 open ports and two 25 , million bytes disc. Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Gustaveson, to award the , contract for purchase of computer mainframe equipment to Fulcrum as recommended • and subject to financing arrangements being secured under separate request to fin- , ancial institutions. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, 0. 10. Front End Loading Truck: The bid results are: • Simpson Equipment, packer body, cab & chasis--$80,255 for a white truck; E-Z Packer body 35 yd. ▪ Cooper Kenworth, cab & Chasis only--$53,878 • Kabco, Packer body only--$30,615; for packer body cab and chasis--$83,115 for white truck, Leach Body 35yd. ▪ Carolina Mack, cab & chasis only--$54,580 . Specialty Waste, packer body, cab & chasis--$89,900 for Kenworth Truck, Canadian Disposal Body, 36 cu.yd. • Sanco, packer body, cab & chasis--$91,855 for White Truck, Dempster body, 38 yd. • Commissioner Walker moved, seconded by Commissioner Gustaveson, to approve the • awarding of the purchase of the front end loading truck to Simpson Equipment, • During discussion the Manager told the Board that the department head had wanted a 38 cu. yd. body but that the difference in the price was so much that he • was recommending a 35 cu. yd. body truck. Since specifications were for a 38 cu. yd. • body, the Board was concerned that some company may not have submitted a bid for a • truck with a 35 cu. yd. body but would have if it had been aware that this range • was acceptable, Both the motion and second were withdrawn and the Purchasing Officer was asked to take the front end loading truck to bid again. Commissioner Willhoit told the Manager that due to some recent reorganization • in Carrboro, there may be an extra vehicle available there. 11. Appointments: Nursing Home Advisory Council: The Clerk was asked to contact those current • members of the Board and ascertain their interest in serving another term. Mental Health Board: Commissioner Gustaveson moved, seconded by Commissioner • Marshall, to reappoint Jan Pinney to another term on this Board. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, ▪ 0. Youth Services Needs Task Force: Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Com- missioner Whitted, to appoint Michael Bramble, Sarah Tillis and Linda Reifsnyder • to this Task Force. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, O. 'q Commissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit, to appoint !. 75€ 0:73 • Robin Wells to this Task Force. Ayes, 5; noes, O. •• CoMMission For Women: Commissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit to appoint Elaine Parker and Meg Kemper to terms on this Commission. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, O. Hillsborough Planning Board: Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Com- missioner Marshall, to appoint Ronald Wagner to the term expiring Februrary, 1983 on this Board. Vote: Ayes,5; noes, O. Energy Commission: The Board asked that contact be made with those whose • • representatives had resigned. Triangle J EMS Council: Mr. John Stewart, consumer alternate, has resigned; the Board asked that it be advertised. • 12, Budget Amendments: Commissioner Gustaveson moved, seconded by Commissioner Whitted, to approve the budget amendments and the EMS Capital Projects Ordinance amendment (see pages WI- n for these amendments). Vote: Ayes,5; noes, O. ;. 13. Resolution Opposing Proposed Amendments to the Regulations Governing the ). Community Development Block Grant Program: Commissioner Whitted said that Triangle I. J COG had adopted a similar resolution at its last meeting; the proposed changes would virtually eliminate two of the three objectives of the Program. (See pages • • 61/ of this book for a copy of the Resolution). 1. Commissioner Marhsall moved, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit, to adopt the Resolution Opposing Proposed Amendments to the Regulations Governing the Community ;. Development Block Grant Program, Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, O. The Clerk was asked to send copies of the Resolution to Mr. Gonzalez, Chair of the House Housing Subcommittee and to our Senators and Congressmen and President Reagan. ?. 14. Announcement: Commissioner Marshall said the Mental Health Association ). would be having its dinner on November 4th at 6:30 p.m. at the Wesley Foundation. L. Chairman Whitted announced that the Board would be taking a tour of the new ) 911 building following lunch and that all were welcome to join. )0 With no further business to come before it the Board adjourned by consensus. Richard E. Whitted, Chair ). 5. 7. Paulette Pridgen-Pond, Clerk 3. 9. 0. $ . , ,...,. t .t, op nE counr Ag BOARD OF Ca.7.43.1.SSION&"RS Action. enda Item No. b AcnoN AGalia.; J.Ti24 ABSTRACT PIEEra-G DATE November 1 , 1982 .. Subject: 1981-82 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Departrent: 1 nande , [ Public Hearing: yes X iriforraatim C.antact: Attachment(s) : Wallace Harding None Phone Number: 732-8181 PURPOSE: To prdsent the June 30, 1982 audit report to the Board of Commissioners. NEED: The report will be presented to the Board and covers all financial activi of the County during the fiscal year 1981-82. Representatives of Touche Ross & Co. will be present to answer any questi . 1 IMPACT: Fulfill requirements of G.S. 159-34. 1 ccozny BOARD OF CaNISSIONERS Action ru-=,-e..a. 074 Item ACTICZ4 RGEavra% ABSTRACT l'UDETM3 DI--ITE November 1, 1982 Subject; Property of John R. Hackney Heirs Subdivision no Depart-m:1:1'c: Plannin: . rgublic Hearing: Ves — AttacIr _Tt(s) : Checklist pg. 1 Irol."1:.-Lon. Contact: Rick Cannity Tax Map pg. 12 phon. miliber: 732-5181 EXT. 347 Plan -_-__---- , -137RPCSE: To consider approval of the Preliminary Plan for the Property of John R. Hackney Heirs. NEED: Property is located in drap.el Hill Township on State Road 1942 (Jones Ferry Road). There is one lot (5.00 acres) proposed out of 76.32 acres. Three lots have already been created through the minor subdivision process. The road proposed is to be a Class C private road from the state road to the lot. This lot is designated Rural Buffer and Water Supply Watershed in the Land Use Plan and is in the south Orange fire district. Lr4PRCT: The proposal meets the existing standards for lot size in the watershed and is bordered by Phil's Creek. The area around the subdivision is wooded land. Approval of this request with the Flood fringe and Stream Buffer would have minimal impacts. REODMMENDATMN: The Planning Staff recommends approval. 4 " i arlASpR SUBDIVISION CHECKLIST A devision of a portion of Property t y (AMER OR DEVELOPER Bernice Haakt�e ' :f _ of John R. Hackney Heirs � NAME OF SUBDIVISION, ADDRESS t•,. BLOCK• LOT P16 21 Fire District Soutnb,�a e ..y TOtiNSHIEChapel Hill TAX MAP 1 t�, c , NAME,OF SURVEYOR Oft ENGINEL�R Freehold E.and Surveys Inc. .'; fi .__ To be develo ed in 1 'base{a�atal number o ores rr6 r(`E_ Total number of 10x8 p ;;�► ;;, Typical dwelling units° bt present single family_ or proposed zz. w Community Individual WATER SUPPLY; Publie(name) 'SEWfiGE TRLA'FMENT;,Public _.. Community Individual Septeic tank ,,,'SCHppL D26 ICT ' Public ` X. -or Private. Class 'k . ,B _t C Access. onto State Road �f��_gt , Road Standard: Historic sites C °}, Other C ), Explain: ;. Existing critical areas such as streams C X.), Flood prone areas {X )s � kF r:, n .tne'Un" ersit Lake Watershed S Land uses in the general.area: d d' ndevela ed land, , roved C ) Recommended Changes ( ) t SKETCH PLAY.RECEIVED (Date) _—APP RLVISED PRBLIMINARY PLAN RECEIVED (Date) �r PRELIMINARY PLAN'RECEIVED {Date) 1 r! -82 +, Erosion Cantrol.OtficertfiF 14-8-82 Preliminary Review by Health Department Perry Burns 8A 82 - h�. -Board.of Education -Pam Ma er ' 10-5-82 Department of Transportation OWASA (if possible) ' Othez -Mebane (if possible) --Hillsborough Cif possible) t Orange/Alamance (if possible) } Preliminary. option by the Planning Board '.c1rs r$• r82 Action by the Gqunty Commissioners ` "`y -Preliminary`} -FINAL-PLAT RECBIVED,(Date) -• All lots were approved by the Health Department Lots failing Health; Departments agproval are combined or. listed properly on the gist '►'t'f. Agreement submitted (where applicable): Approve -Road-Maintenance Agree d ' ( ) Improvements have been provided for; completed, bond, letter.af"credit, cash. Date. Final. OWASA agproval (where applicable) pan all Mans & specifications, Date ti��E ; ► ) .Final DOT approval on plat sr` Final action by the Plannixg Board ig -�fi ,„,i„1„.>›...», _��.....-... •;r�,,:1` - ,f:zV ..it"1a ..c;r`^+,.l2, y. ..•w4. w.M-.14 y;"T. s r 4'i gP: ... ",e w;-,;.,' 77.4' ,. y, „e y �C t o : ,,,re U "_ ,. . :�! ''"' r-'T1," `^ T "~� ,-..i. +rc` ' , _ ' A n :i);4,-4..,,..,a 0„ f'-s.° ;, . . � .r1,; •-- . ! 1 _ --- --- 4.5 i AC.• _,,., :x`('249 �'` yno ,�,+ [ _„ IA \\( it .,.......-----\\i..: \„, 65..•. " 0 1. : v„4.X. ' ' it:i:..i'at y ):. ....\\*‘.\ '\. 5675 AC. > /2. t...‘„ / I / & ,t / \ NIP .7 1,\. i i \„ ii oac. / ' 1 / iii . ) I ... -.. ‘14, .r../ IL + ! 1 Ny~ 1 1 „ ,.. /HY' i M MAP j ti i \..... 1;7-I l J AI/ i r /// +f \ 1 „ft.,./ t2 .„...e. 60.5 AC. 1 �� t r t ~ 4!`+��t~~�!;--w .^ -°�+�337"r 4335 r QV 45, 6. SO21 CD 14 \ 1359,. • . m e s ` + u ti r r. `4-fia t. :17.1,-. .- , —� 4�m!' s] 1 a,.: Y .} '�iri s } , ti � 64,x{' _ w�” 4 `' ii sY ' � 1... ',...4... . ....:- gA h. + Ir e t }s • ?G y rw, " �'- g��+i� i. ' �' ""^ iw.� � " 4 A. 'k � .i.Y +.? � .o 3 i 4 .4.5 4 ��iir y '. _`,• . r"; `i � a..3.h -� 1 �■s'Y T!.�,v:i _ � , .rt.& lo' i:'. --E ' .p• ra '• " •- , •, S ' 75F7 '• ap,AiNzE coluNT:y 075 BOARD OF COC.NIISSIONS Action .15;n1.-4,-1a, Item O. ACTION AGEMA. 1.11 A.BSTRA= 1=T.D7G DATE November 1. 1982 _ Subject: Preliminary Plat of Property of John C. Blackwodd --- (-75.;.7.Ti1-11c.1.-ent: Planning L Public Hearing: Yes x Attachment(s) 11 Czntect: Checklist Pg., 1 Rick Cannity Tax Maps Pg. 2-3 Ntai:er: 732-8181 Ext. 347 Memo P.. 4 Plat : To consider approval of the preliminary plan for the property of John C. Blackwood. NEED: Property is located in Chapel Hill Township on SR 1723, New Hope Church Road, near the proposed 1-40 Interchange. There are 4 lots. proposed out of a 4.27 acre parcel on the south side of SR 1723. There are 94 acres on the north side of New Hope Church Road. Two lots have been created from the original tract. This proposal would create an additional 3 lots from the original tract. All lots have Health Department approval. The propery is in New Hope Fire. District. Dr_PACT: The proposal meets the lot area requirements of the Zoning Ordinance_ The adjacent property is used for residential and agricultural purposes. The final plat should have a 30 wide drainage easement on Lots 1 & 4. COMMENDATION: The Planning Board recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the 30' drainage easement. The Planning Staff recommends approval. - ASOR SUBDIVISION CHECKLIST NAME'OF SUBDIVISION John C. Blackwood OWNER OR DEVELOPER John C. -Blackwood ADDRESS At. 2 929- 832-6742 !TOtdhtStilP c3iagel xili TAR MAP 9 BLOCI L4� Fire District .....New H e. NAME OF- SURVEYOR OR ENGINEER ; ei f Total number of lots:: 4 To be develoged iu __phase(s)., Total:number of acres ; Typical dwelling units at present Community ar proposed a Individual,_ g�,,_„_ WATER, SUPPLY. Public(nami) SEgAGE'TREATNENT-,Publ1 £ommuaity -Individual Septei . tauic x �S£HOOL DTSTRICT r ?.Access, onto State Road 0 1723 Road Standard: Public 'I - or Private Class A 8 ._. __• C i Existing critical areas such streams ( x ,}, Flood prone areas ( }, Historic Sites ( ), Other _ }, Explain:,,,,,,,,, ,,., One stream across P ro err Land uses in the general.area: sl ent a -'Agricultural ; KETCH PLAN RECEIVED (Date) Approved ( ) Recommended Changes I PRELIMINARY PLAN RECEIVED (Date)^ REVISED-PRXLIMINARY PLAIN RECEIVED (Date} ' Erosion C rol'.Officez Preliminary Review by Health Department ont Department of Transportation lVr' Board.of Education 011ASA (if possible} Y { --Mebane (if possible) s Other �• ,� -Hillsborough (if possible) -Orange/Alamance {if possible} '3 1 •Freli:Tinary,"Action by the Flaming Board Recommended v . »; •Pr:eliuiinary. Action by the County Commissioners.. —FINAL PLAT RECEIVED,(Date) ( } All lots were approved by the Health Department t a t 4•< '@ Lots failing Iiealtti Departments approval are.combined-or. 1.i.sted propexly on the plat ( } Road*Maintenance Agreement submitted (where applicabl'). Approved Improvements have been provided for; completed, band, letter of credit, cash. Date. I F; ( is ( ) Fine] OWA&A approval (where applicable)•on all plans s specifications. Date s r{.,w .Final DOT approval on plat Final action by the Planning Board '� 0. • L'... -..-..,,,...-;',: - 4','. ..- . :'-' -.::..- --- '!":' ' '4,F ‘'S..f.r4.-.4.'1.7.4.—. . t'-' i..447..--,:.-:.'-..:.'1'!"' c',..r4,--" • --4,44.:4•41'::,',"4..,,-4:!..4,4‘4,:4.k..r.le?"te.r;:"...'''''-,!74.4:".7""'"7r-L'''':.--•":''■,."..'r,;".■-.,•....", ,".",,,,,,4 .'-:: i- - ''".*,!:,",..r.,,,:",701'.4.,";P":.:,i:7 , .':-....":,;',".;:',",.."!:;lc"''.1/..:.:7-,c..;:';",,',"''.—.'-.-..."".":"'..,':..•......"..,:"..'"'.,"",..-,.;•fr- '•,r4-......, --, . .. . . . ...-- ... • .. .. .. . ,,ar• - • . •••••- ---* .i.. . . . t, 2 . . ,........• ,... - WI • . .. . .. , i . ..1.....„...,...-...._. 1 . . — ,o;/•,- -c. . . 1,N •,,,,, . .. a ‘ . . 0 117.147 A , t.., x..., •••:• 1 •• „ . . . • C I '''''...''''''...............s\ . • . ..• l i . EP i . e-- 10 • i i .. vo 7,:••---,-' . . .... 1 *O$Al ,,;..,.*-..,-.,. .- ..! "/*". .• -•.-ti".•e, "" •• .. . • .-"'- ' t . / i 7 1 CP ' C174,40„. co / I / 1/1 . Ac.111:,/, 441,4)Iiio„riu, / I J 8 / I — • r / i , i / ' . . 1 .44,4 • ^ ge CAC A .. . . .. , .. . , • , . . , • _ V. . , • .• .. .... . .. . , .. . .6 rA <I,AXP 11-7 611- .. .. 1 . ,. ........._____ ! r., .._ R iq i • • .., 4. PLAT REFERENCES .7 4 4 roR TAX PURPOSES • Vs' t . „.,„,..—. ---:— .--; ..4.4.... ........... 1171 It7 et cm:,ro.cm,/,,ahrt IL .... •41.0.04.1 I ."".""..............r........".• ............. .•••••■rowr.00..v.,.............. 4,eywo ...Vt.* ....... AntACR444 104&AVM,,C,. " i ` . '' .947719v004 22.ft. . ..............._„..............-1 r.-0:-......L..„. .„,„,..„,,,.._ —.. . - • . . .... .-... . • ;. ., . ' ":.'‘. 7'.'1'1..''' •,,''''''...;,;•;*41t3,La'i,:''''L; • i ''.!-15'''.."' ''' 1 '. •'. ' ''''''r''fk•fit.?•V:i.:i'n'•I'''.:i•-•'''.-. .',••.4Z,'Fftettt. : , L;:.',',,,';''''.."Y,,,4) -S :.!' ' '!..:••:',r-qie • . .,.:,--` •••••.;?..,-..•'•'';',,,,,,F..'::. - ''',„ .:'-•`•• '•,'''' -,!"-J1::-.-Wstr, ‘ ,.. i i 1 1 •,.,„ Pg. 3 1 ....r. -.... , -" f •,..., -^% \ ' \ ' • $ sO k".:,\'''"H,...,9, /\ , 1 . CS'e •!..."' .r...rf'..‘,4). / / i .■.'''''i. \ Atalr't,„7.0f5,;5;:e 4.14 , /\ .......,-.--!-"7"--- \-- • 1,5, Das ---14„,-, -- ,5)56.3 l'irlIA 1-85 04',/. 'It*TA..) \ 7 it / \,/..„,// ItC 1'643., / •.( 6 \ ,1,.;',C;\\i/e/ / ''''/CP .•:ttek..... ki., AC.. 12.07 AC Y ' 1 i ... \.\'il98 6119 ^7341 , , ,ti• / -/ I I';?' :•• Q193i40 . .1 / 1 / / i el! / I j( / 4 34 AC. / / / 1 \ \' 1 '.,,<*, i IA. ..—...--.— • f. 1 , , ,.. ,-.„ , -P/ / / ,..< \... N, . ,,,'• 1 i '• ,f/ / / 10 1 C7 ./ ,,, 6.135 Ac I . ,. i , ' / ' /.7 / ,' 1 s■ /..Th \ /// i / ■481 I I i I\j6 5-AC • ..;■",:,','4).' a .i . 11ti■ ''.,, . ! _.."4,,,,,21„..y."7--"—/././ / . ' •Iii. sse.aLi i ....„../ ,. ....L...._i____....,. r 1 1 . I • 7 -.) ! Ni I \ . 0 0 40 1 i i , , 1 , , ..:• „ . . , • . •.•, Pg 4 ORIINGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT BILLSBOROUGI3 NORTH CAROLINA 27278 4.•i/i;:° ul MEMO TO: Planning Board FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: Division of the property of John C. Blackwood DATE: October 14, 1982 Attached is a copy of a plat submitted to this office by Mr. Blackwood. It shows the creation of four lots. The tract from whic these lots were created has been divided two times since Sub ivision Regulations went into effect. The large tract is hown as lot twelve on the 1974 tax map. Lots 12B and 12C wire created sometime after 1974. The minor subdivision process is based on the Lot of Re- cord concept, which means the lot arrangement as it existed at the time of the enactment of Subdivision Regulations. At this point twollots have previously been divided, Mr. Blackwood's pro posal would add three lots. This would be a total of five lots plus the original tract. The minor subdivision process allows the creation of three new lots plus the remaining tract. After that a di?rision is called a major subdivision and must meet the requireme is for that process. It i the Planning Staff's position that the property Mr. Blackwood purchased was a part of a larger tract and that his subdivisi n proposal is a major subdivision. If the Board finds that the proposal is a major subdivision the Staff asks that this submittal be considered the preliminary plat and hat the Board make a recommendation to the Commissione s. /dg Z It I 0.92 ac. • 64** 0.92 dc, to (JA') 083 ac 19 Ali as8 9056, N 8,--24-04 W 1.45 total (4-8) j6F IS to be OffaChd to/of JA 10 form 1015, 06'? NOr-r� --j and Is not a Separate bVildipu 101. ZT 76C0 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF OZMISSIONEPS Action Agenda ALMON AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Item MEETING DATE November 1 1962 'Subject: Modification of the Special Use Permit for The Timbers Public Hearing: yes X noi IDepartment: 13 1 1 Information Contact: Attacnrent(s Rick Cannity Plan - Phona, Namberr_. 732-8181, ext. 347 _ _ PURPOSE: Consideration of a modification of the Special Use Permit for the Timbers. NEED: The developer proposes to relocate the swimming pool from near 1-40 on the north side of the project to the south side of the project near the main entrance. The proposed change moves the pool from the low side of the project to the high side. UPACT: There should be no substantial impact from this proposed change. 4 eCOMMNDATION: The Planning Board recommends approval of the proposed modification to the Special Use Permit for the Timbers, The Planning staff recommends, approval. o '8 I pi ( Ei L...... .. .iii . , me �. • ,, . ,,:,..: . . ,,.. N - i.--" . ,..... . - 1 14- - . 1 - z---- ;-:. . . Iii ii I / t f p r,( I 11! ! ,au _ i 1, ' .. i. c. 1-,..i •.-, w iiiJL:L� Yw . 'i �` I i q cam :„!,..,....i' , pa H . 7-7:T ,,,:i...... 4. tt „,,,f, 41 �' , A% L• .4 • , "- ..., 762 oakinzrz cczyN.-.7.7c EcLaRD OF COZ,2,11SSION&-45 Action 019 Item, N'o. ACTION MENt1; ABsTro.cr MEETING DATE November 1, 1982 SubjeCt-t Proposed Procedures for Amending the Land Use Plan Departmnt: planning j I PUbiiC yes X r0... -------- a)Proposed poli Irifotio cy on nnan Contact: Fred Luce Land Use Plan amendments 732-8181 ext, 346 Phone N1.21*.er: PURPOSE: Consideration of proposed procedures for amending the Land Use Plan. NEED: The Orange County Land Use Plan was adopted by the Board of Commissioners on September 2, 1981. The act of adoption formalized the Plan text and map as County policy in land use matters. The Plan will need to be amended from time to time to reflect changing conditions in the County. The attached procedures set forth the process by Which the Plan can be amended. DIPACT: Adoption of the proposed procedures will separate a rezoning request from an associated Plan amendment after September 1983 and overcome the technical difficulties the Planning Board has experienced in recommending on this kind of dual request. The proposed procedures will also prevent "piecemeal" amendment of the Plan through the requirement that the Plan may only be amended once a year after September 2, 1983. 4 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Staff originally proposed that the following language be included in the proposed procedures: CATEGORIES OF AMENDMENTS Amendments are classified as principal or secondary amendments. principal amendments include: a) additions to or modifications of goals and policies; b) creation of new activity nodes or additions to existing node areas exceeding 10 acres; c) proposals for new freestanding plan areas or additions to existing areas that exceed 100 acres. page 1 of 2 • 7f5z, 1 080 Secondary amendments include: a) revision of a node area where the additional area is contiguous with the existing area and does not increase the existing area by more than 10 acres; b) extension of any plan area where the additional area is contiguous with the existing area and does not increase the existing area by more than 100 acres; c) correction of any error or omission in the Plan; d) revisions to any factual or descriptive material in the Plan. WHEN AMENDMENTS MAY BE CONSIDERED Principal amendments to the Plan shall be considered once a year at the quarterly joint public hearing in February. Secondary amendments to the Plan may be considered four times a year at the quarterly joint public hearings in February, May, August, and November. However, no principal amendment is to be considered in conjunction with a rezoning request for the same property. Such rezoning requests may only be considered at subsequent hearings or meetings. (Note: after September 2, 1983, no Land Use Plan amendments are to be considered in conjunction with a rezoning request) . The Planning Board removed the distinction between principal and secondary amendment during their consideration of the proposed policy. Their change means that some development proposals could take over one year to receive approval. Staff feels this is inconsistent with efforts to streamline the development process. Staff's proposal would greatly shorten the approval time for development proposals where a "minor" amendment to the Plan was involved. Planning Staff recommend b approval of the Planning Board's proposed pro- cedures with the inclusion of Staff language on principal and secondary amend- ments. 764 -r 081 Planning Board Subcommittee Proposal 9/30/82 Planning Board Proposal 10/18/82 PROPOSED PROCEDURES FOR AMENDING THE LAND USE PLAN PURPOSE The Orange County Land Use Plan (Plan) was adopted by the Board of Commissioners on September 2 , 1981. The act of adoption formalized the Plan text and map as County policy in land use matters. The Plan will need to be amended from time to time to reflect changing condi- tions in the County. This document proposes procedures by which the Plan will be amended. REASONS FOR AMENDMENTS The Plan may be amended for the following reasons: a) because of changed or changing conditons in a particular area or areas of the County; b) to correct an error or omission in the Plan; c) in response to a change in land use policy. SOURCES OF AMENDMENTS Proposed amendments to the Plan may originate from: a) the Board of Commissioners; b) the Planning Board; c) an amendment application made by any person or agency. WHEN AMENDMENTS MAY BE CONSIDERED Until September 2, 1983 amendments to the Plan will be considered at the regularly scheduled quarterly public hearings. A rezoning re- quest may be considered at the same time as a reauested amendment to the Plan.. After September 2, 1983, amendments to the Plait shall be considered once a year at the quarterly, joint public _hearing in Feb- ruary and no' rezoning request shall be considered in conjunction with a land use plan amendment for the same property. REFERRAL OF AMENDMENTS Amendments proposed by the Board of' Commissioners or the Planning Board or an amendment application made by a person or agency shall be referred to the Orange County Planning Department. Amendment applica- tions should contain a description of the changed or changing condi- tions which justify the requested change, or the error or omission in the Plan which the amendment seeks to correct, or the changed land use policy which necessitates an amendment. a 08 STAFF REVIEW For each proposed amendment to the Plan, the Orange County Planning Department shall carry out an analysis of the proposed amendment and its effect on land use in the particular area of the proposed change and the County as a whole. Based on its analysis, Planning Staff shall prepare a recommendation on the proposed amendment. PLANNING BOARD PRELIMINARY REVIEW The proposed amendment along with the analysis and recommen- dation of the Planning Staff shall be considered by the Planning Board at a regularly scheduled meeting. The Planning Board may refer the proposed Plan amendment to its Township Advisory Council (s) in the area of the County to be affected by the change; a) on its motion; b) on a request from the chairperson (s) of the Township Advisory Council (s) in the areas to be affected; c) in response to a request from Planning Staff. JOINT PUBLIC HEARING For all amendments to the Plan, the Board of Commissioners shall hold a joint public hearing with the Planning Board. When a public hearing is held, notice shall be given by publishing the time, place and substance of the proposed amendment at least twice in a newspaper of general circulation in the County. This notice shall appear in the newspaper for two successive weeks with the first notice appearing not less than fifteen days nor more than twenty-five days before the date set for the public hearing. RECONSIDERATION by the PL'. NING BOARD Following a joint public hearing on a Plan amendment, the pro- posed amendment shall be referred back to the Planning Board for its review and recommendation. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION The Board of Commissioners shall decide by formal vote , on the request for a Plan amendment following the final Planning Board re- commendation. LAND USE PLAN ANNUAL REPORT The Planning Board at its regular meeting each November shall hear a report prepared by the Planning Staff on the status of the Land Use Plan including; a) a summary of proposed amendments to the Plan over the past year and their disposition; b) an analysis of current and potential land use issues in the County and how well the Plan addresses these issues; c) staff recommendation for possible changes to the Plan. ■!' " 766 O8a Based on Planning Staff's report, the Planning Baord may direct Staff to prepare a specific amendments to the Plan br, if in the Board' s opinion the changes needed in the Plan are extensive in scope and number, the Board may recommend to the Board of Commissioners a wholesale revision of the Land Use Plan, :'? ; .. .emu' ^:a= Eta km Z' CQ�1xSSIO. Action:p : CrOla I F.GE'Elk ITEi ?BST ICT Item too. I =um DATE November 1, 1982 Subject: Propose Amendments to the Adopted Land Use Plan for Cheeks Township Dep?rL-mw1t: Planning I public Hearing: yes x; no.. Athar_h nent(s); a) proposed Amendment III.fOZ7m i.O^ Contact: Fred Luce Map; b) Minuteslof Cheeks Township phone ilooh n: 732-8181 ext. 346 Advisory.Councii P: To consid fx proposed amendments to the Adopted Land Use Plan for Cheeks Township. NEED': The propo ed amendments to the Land Use Plan would add a commercial/industrial activity node t the intersection of I-85 and Mt. Willing Road (SR 1120). The existing ten year transition area would be extended south of Efland to include the area bounded on the north by the ridgeline dividing the McGowan Creek and Seven Mile Creek sub-basins, on the east by Dewey Road (SR 1146) and West Ten Road (SR 1144), on the south Seven Mile Creek, and on the west by Watson Road (SR 1320) and Thompson Road (SR 1377). The existing twenty year transition area west of Efland would be e , ed to include an area bounded on the north by 1-85, Industrial Drive (SR 1374) and the ridgeline dividing Seven Mile Creek and McGowan Creek sub-basins, on the east bye Watson Road (SR 1320) and Thompson Road (SR 1377), on the south by Bowman Road ( R 1142) and West Ten Road (SR 1144), and on the west by Rock Quarry Road (SR 1143) . A joint public hearing on the proposed amendments to the adopted Land Use Plan for Cheek Township was held by the Board of County Commissioners and Plan- ning Board on eptember 27,neACT: _. prop ed amendment tb the Plan would add an additional 245 acres of potential land for industrial and commercial development in Cheeks Township. Together with the three existing commercial/industrial activity nodes already designated in the Cheeks Plan, a potential total of approximately 1000 acres would be designated fir this type of development. The residential transition areas have also been increased in the Plan and these higher density areas would call for public sewer and water in much of central Cheeks Township. ECOMMENDATIONS I.The Cheeks Township Advisory Council on September 7, 1982, held a meeting and heard a Staff presentation on the proposal. Lindsay Efland, a member of the Advisory Council, made the following motions: MOTION 11 That the Cheeks Township Advisory Council approve the extension of the ten and twenty year transition areas as defined and presented by the Planning Staff. No discussion VOTEt Unanimous MOTION 2: That industrial development be permitted anywhere within the I-85/US 70 corridor and on either side of the corridor as defined by the transition area boundaries and extend as far east as the Cheeks/Hillsborough Township lines and not be limited only to specific areas. -"''''''"-'" ,•-' -''4:- :-. ...:T,.=A:''-';',1*.?-4,;-,,,,' 7,':-L"-..",- :'.;:',, '',4:-,.....:5,,,:--,--,.',.:,,•;-,:y7ii;;.40-4,,4wri*.v,,,-,;;;;-:-;.3.4.i-,,t,., ci...!,,,:.4.-:-:- . " . - ,' -:-.--;- •..:S,:- .. ., ,.... . .. . . .,,,..g,t...,:itZ•:.,..!,,,7?.;,==,,,,,. ,,t. ::, , ,. -:-:,,:-:•,=4:%•g-=,1:::,4" ..i.t.4p,i--,:; :r 4. . 4 Discus ion followed on the activity node concept versus, an ope door concept of industrial/commercial development. VOTE; Unanimous MOTION 3: That the Cheeks Township Advisory Council go on record as supporting sewer-and water extensions into he tran- sition areas for Cheeks Township. • Discuspion followed in which the Town Advisory Council members indicated a desire to see this item included in the Land Use Plan: VOTE; Unanimous Ti. The Planning Board, at its meeting on October 18, 1982, considered the --. 1, pioposal and 9e following motion was made by Carl Walters; Action sbluld be postponed on adoption of the proposed amendment and during the next two tp three months a thorough study should be made of alternative plans. The Planning Board should invite 1) 2-3 members of the Cheeks Advisory Council, 2) representatives of the business community such as the Chapel Bill Chamber of CmmmRrce, 3) one or more representatives of Hillsborough Town government, 4) representatives of utility providers and 6) representatives from Chapel Hill I wn us and Carrboro governments to discussions on amending the Plan. SECOND David Shanklin VOTE; 1 Unanimous III, The Planning Staff feels the proposed amendment addresses many of the concerns of the residents about the Plan for their area and recommends approval. 1}• `1' i E f 1 M Elk, Jim } &''i '•• ."`gyp}-- t P CK 1 +r- LEsAW I. ....I E: t -'•tcs�:�it rsi%'� T. -`tSS < �y ,' -t+y M 34 �,/ '='`sm+�t,�,tE�fi�;`lac;�3',.•��,•'`<:��s't3;2�s}t �t� ,r��3:t�','>�.•`.^•`;��i-;�tL',FQ53''cS���'�r��i ��� `��}• ct •t >. � _ �� �� Y `°�'a"3�.?r •,.� 's'$" v�-'' ,,,f�t ,.,,.'� '',�f�`��rj, 4�1�}Cj�� ,�..,�,�� � 115, t• v,� F �r�� � `.- kr'p�^�.2,�i'!xr'vµ�Y'.,`��1 ��- y ' 'ta ." v i' {+sit �.'-�'' sr4SE` ,�#Y' � y tt� °'ter, S-• c4 2ikw +` C•,v� •t#�+',,,a; A -' ,,JJ•'��,,,, .,ty,'i:', _ max: ..�� �4. - •u` "y. •s rrCo/b .� 'il'' 4° s+�ts�s+�!rSa7..""'a"_" } j )' «fA. i'l�'1 '7 NY`i{::jiarl �'f'•� fi�.s .W�l� v.+'}I1 •4K• 1 . � y i • � ���,� ��,d� y.ra�*'!ff y 5l':r�t'x >>�.�' .` NCC?'nt"y:'-�... :r"f•°f fY.i�'.Vs...Yp'11e?53:-`°�FjF.,if Jy x..„TYi2'2c}Q�#¢�w' .' ,f;3�.'°�t't{ *04 c,MOP,;y$ vv ki � }47et � � A.♦r�- V Fn, sr "l; •.jLJ. ,.•-}t T• ,s,.`Ir .> 8.4" J'-��Z':k�'S M 1 . .�; �•.• z. .� �Jt •.�',;{`'�{%.v:4_ �r.asy:�s� o'' '�f$.c�':�.if�� i� '''•,�,�',`�"�° ��'t3r•- <o.V. . � ,��a !�„S All �'v�t��kJ4 M�,; ; K�� y+� f{`J5 � •2� •%,,L f ' .►•f' s_• k `+'!�= r ,�"�,� Q``��#•-�Y�,'•�'{.�'�''j1,�� �'��, r�, .r?ar „g�'�;x �},`.-�� ��1�'!,�' ."""�'..'r�a•�� • t :!ti'',�•`..".zv �,ti��+.$L,',.t�`�'a,�'�fi.�.�£�'Xf.`.v�.'•.`•}y�w3+�<:�" :�s•' ) ',_�.��< .w' r a sk�c� t„r:fr :+'�.�•. { 4.•.io,- .f: ,ny"'',a Dz�+'�'`.2-.�'.� •;R, � � 4� �• y..,��" kr..r �'�r.,-,�.' i' r ��:r�i?fi�::.;� w;�%"'$;; gag a d, f v:. �' �J, x< •Z•:. (:r$��3:}+�i�`'.'`�c �•y N'f`�1r,'.r, �r'�-�v� Yt�{'�:�'� �•Y�-"� ��'•.�+�ii�3,�s T�, .�' ia'r�r' ,$'R{ �rF r'�r�j�/'�. •��'9-0;1��°�� �.S��f•�$� H'Nri:' }YF )'t •r�f..'N� ���:s y1�•it-tf��:�`AJ,r+.�� fy.�YJ" r�� �. l�Y�•�<� r�4 ° •t�:cl;,f�"` �G �'' y; <`49'?� y',C�v#s<-:x31�s`.Qtl.::�'£,`.$` S �yr� E}x 9��.�y��.y�%yh`'�F :��.`�t-�.�s�.,u�'c-r��.<. �iC-�•3a�Y r 4', tar�� � 1 •b�fw... �� r . • i t � � ! i i t � i ; • If • :t ti t i � f E' • • • - . . • • • ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT yntrABOROUGE NORTE CAROLINA. • 27278 t.2-.Fnru) \\■!!! • Cheeks nship Advisory Council aptexter 7, 1982. Commants :EMBERS PRESENT Bill Dorsett (chair), David Shanklin, Lindsay Efland, 1 Sun Eland, Ben Lloyd, abhn Fuller STAFF PRESENT: Fred Luce, Susan Smith GUESTS PRESENT:I Josephine Barbour, Mrs. Shanklin, Members of UNC rpast:trent of City and Regional Planning class an Planning Theory (Professor Maliria) Fred Luce opened the meeting with a presentation on the adopted Lard Use Plan for Cheeks Township and the purpose of the meeting which was to discuss proposed amendments to the Cheeks Land Use Plan in light of rcoposed expansion of Corpora- tion lake rather than construction of the Seven Idle Creek Reservoir and possible commercial and industrial development-in the appropriate sub-basin. Smith con- tinued with a presentation on the proposed amendments to the Land Use Plan. These armaments included the addition of a cormerciaVindustrial transitirxx aativitv node at Edland 'and extension Of the ten and twenty ear tranSationarea around EMand. &mith also presented information cm the acreage and possible popula- tion density for these areas. General discussion followed the presentations covering the function and location of the activityl nodes; the availability of industrial sites along the I 85-US 70 corridor; okoanded residential development; the Liiclihooxt location, and impact of the extension of sewer and water Liles along US 70; the 201 Plan for Hills- borough; the impact of recommendaticrs in the Water Pasottroes Task Force Report; and the suitability of the corridor for prime industrial and ccrue.rcial develop- ment. Lindsay Mend Ind Bill Dorsett indicated that the proposed amendments to the Transition areas were more in line with the TAC's original proposal before the Land Use Plan was adopted and would appear tote satisfactory. The Township Advisory Council renters expressed a concensus that the activity . node concept along the 1-85/US 70 corridor was an unlikely idea and should be deleted foam the corridor. They indicated thattheyenvisiomed that the corridor would be open fOr consideration either as industrial, oommercial or residential. , • . - . • :„ • ; " • ' • — re: .-• - • v. [, Shank.lin sugges td alternatives to the Lecation of the reservoir on Corporation Lake including placing the dam closer to the head waters as well as using a nue- berofdams on the stream branches feeding the Er o Fiver rather than a single ... Shanklin also Suggested that the Transition area be extended further north to accemodate development in that area. Lindsay f1rw that residents of Cheeks Township were familinrwi.Wa 00. satisfieliwithla nib developcent pattern for Cheeks Tcwnship. Lindsay ElLandlmade the folLowirqmetions: YETICN 1: That the Cheeks Township AdviscryCruncil approve the extension of the ten and twenty year transition areas as defined and presented by the Planning staff. No discussion NICmZ: Unanimous NCTICN 2: ThaC, industrial development be permitted anywhenewithin the 1-85/US 70 Corridor and on either side of the corridor as defined by the transition area boundaries and extend as far east as the Cheeks/ FillIsbceough Township lines and notbelimited only to Specific areas. Discussion followed on the activity node concept versus an on doori concept of industrialiocamercial developeent. VOT : Unanimous MCITCN 3: That the Cheeks Tewnship Advisoxy Council go on record as suppertiz' ig sewer and water extensions into the transition areas for Cheeks 1117#11-ip. Discuission followed in which the TAC umbers indicated a desire to see this itan included in the Land Use Plan. eCfI : Unanimous The Township Advisory Council meMbers expressed concera that the available land for development did not coincide with the land designated and proposed far - meat, stressingi local, residents familiarity with the availability of land. Staff indicate d that the Planning Board would consider the amendnents and the 1/.1 can:rents on Mbnday, September. 20 and that a joint public hearing of the Planning Board and Board of scanty cmmmissioners on the amendments was scheduled for September 27. I The meeting adjoinured at 9:00 P.M. . • ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF OMMISSIONERB Action Agenda ACTION Ac ; ITDI ABSTRACT Item Mo. -e / MEETING DATE .v .; Subject: Extensic o Zoning to Cheeks Township • Cepartment: P1 T • I Public Hearing: . • yes __x_ no A - t(s. List of proposed 4.rmation Contact: Rick Oannity zoning classif,cations pg. 1-4 Phone NUmber: . KippcisEz TO receive Planning Board recommendation on the extension of the Zoning 'Ordinance to Cheeks Township. • NEED: The Board os Cannissioners approved zoning of Chapel Hill Township in 1967. Eno in 1970,arid Hillsborough and Bingham in 1981. Extension of zoning to Cheeks nship was delayed to allow more time for consideration of water- shed protection measures. In general, the recommendations of the Water Resources TaSk Force have been adopted or modified and adopted by the County CommissianerS. The proposed changes to the Land Use Plan which went to Public Hearing on September 27, 1982 address the concerns of the Cheeks Township Advisory Council. ' - - Previous Plahlnilg Board actions recomMended a delay in the application of-„..,.s, zoning to Cheeks Township. These recommendations were made on December 30, 1980 and October 19, 1981. 111. joint aphlic hearing on the extension of zoning to Cheeks. Township was held hy the Hoard of County Commissioners and Planning Board on September 21, 1982. ! - ; IMPACT: Extension of zoning to Cheeks will provide a means of protecting the water- / sheds that lie within the Township. It will also control the development of incompatible land, uses and the public costs associated with such develop- ment. HECCVMDIDATION: tithe Planting 'Board-it the October 18, 1982 meeting recommenced the following: . Shanklin motioned to delay extension of ' zoning ordinance until after a decision is made on the prop.�s©d amendments to the Land Use Plan are in place. The motion was seconded by Walters. The vote was unanimous. The !Planning Staff recommends extension of zoning to Cheeks Township. PROPOSED ZQUVQ CLASSIFMMON v � J CHEF S ` AJSH IP—SMM' M:tt 1982 PROPOSED TAX MAP TOTAL SIZE OF ZONING LOT TONING USE NO. NAME OF USE BLK/LOT LOT SIZE (includes 1/2 of R/W) DISTRICT A-P ? 1. First lady Beauty Salon 6 - 34 21.1 acres (some Occupation) 3= 2. Johnson and Son Logging 6 30 12.5 acres Approx. 6 ac. /'t1W earner Company. 600' E-of S.R. 1343 AS 3. _ Blakely's_Nursery_._.— 9 - 15A_--- 2.5 acres _ 1 ac- /W. line 250'_long__ m _ -- from SW corner EC - S i 4. Chapman's Automotive 10 - 5,7A 28.30 acres 1 ac. 250'Eprop. line 250' EC - 5(Special Use W prop. Line 354' S of SR 1333 Remaipddr of Tract) - 5. Hinshaw's Cabinet Shop 11 - 15 less than 1 so. Whole Lot EC - 5 6. McAdams Auto Repair 14 - 20A 3.02 ac. 2 acres SE 250' E of S.R.3.004 EC - 5 NE 275' E of S.R: 1004 7. Graves Welding & Machine 23 - 16 Shop Less than l ac. Whole fat EC - 5 lS .. ,t• ! 8. Mace Heavy Equipment Co. 25 - 1 2 acres 100' x 450' GC - 4 *; 24 - 12 1 acres Whole Lot is s 11 - 12 57 acres 2 1j2 so. 400' x 250t ;i 9. Mebane Foreign Car Service 25 - SA 2.85 acres' 1.5 ac. ISO' x 400' NC - 2 L 10. Mebane Mill outlet & 25 - 0 1;4 acres Whole Lot NC - 2 Convenience Store .�. 1l. Corner Market 25 - 30A Bess than 1 ac. Whole Lot NC - 2 3;'-3s• 12. Midway Gass Grocery 25 - 13 Less than 1 ac. Whole fat NC - 2 ,•t';". ` ''•i SK"r�lj ' 13. Gene's Beauty Shop 25 - 22 Less than 1 ac. Whole Lot NC - 2 14. Big "T" Place 25 - 27 Less than 1 ac. Whole Lot NC - 2 i .. 15, Twin Crossing Game Room 28 - 21C 1.57 acres Whole Lot NC - 2 16. Catawba Timber Co. Woodyard 28 - 22A 13.97 acres 2.7 ac. 2004 N 375' R, EC 5 `zt J. t PROPOSED TAX MAP TOTAL SIZE OF ZONING LOT ZONING � t USE NO. NAt+R;.OF USE BLY/ DT LOT $IZE (includes 1/2 of R/W) DISTRICT „ 3 17. Frazier's Body Shop 28 - 22 2.31 acres whole Lot EC - g } 18. Orange Alamance Water Co. 28 - 21H Less than 1 acre whole Lot 0 - I Office .yt 19. Rancor Inc. 28 - 21G 9.5 acres whole Lot E - I ;. 7 20. Al Stegall's Front End 28 - 35 1 acre Whole Let sc - 5 ' 'a Service Y -28_ 37-f 36C 17.45 acres 2.5 aC. tTSE 450' N of U.S. 70 EC NW 450' N of U.S. 70 22. Fins Service Station 28 - 20A 3.6 acres 2 ac. S8 400' B of S,R, 1119 EC - 5 :.;' NE 250' E of S.R. 1114 23. King's Garage 29 - 7 3 acres 1.5 acres 200' x 300' EC 28 26 24. Carmichael's Sharp All Shop 29 - 16 6 acres 150' x 300' EC - 5 ` a small Engine Repair 25. Log Cabin 30 4A •^�•j;: Less than 1 acre whale Lot EC -- 5 mj 26. Tyndall Gas & Grocery 30 -•10 1 acre` a e Lot EC - 5 •. & Lawnmower Repair �. ; F Redman industries Whole Lot {_ 27. 31-8-40 9.97 acres y 28, Pettiford & Pennix Service 31-B-9 Z acre 'Whole Lot EC - 5 ' Station t 29. Sfland milling o, F g 31-A-34 2 acres 1 ao, SW 275` W of s.R, 1004 I - 1 t 30, Old Stare =; 34 - 5 Less than 1 acre Whole Lot NC - 2 31. K D G Manufacturing 34 - 8 3,25 acres 1 ac, 150' x 300' 32. Orange Hosiery Hull. 36-A-2 Less than 1 acre Whole tot E - T ::�r;�ti�.•Ty 33. Red Earn Auction House 36-A-3,4 1 acre Total of both late EC - 5 r "! 39, Brown Arzella service 36-A-•6 1 acre - Whole Lot EC - $ Station 35. Pantry Convenience Store 36-A-10 1 1/2 acre Whole Lot EC - 5 aq . w� � t PROPOSED 1 :! SIZE OF ZONING i USE NO., NAK:OF UU. BLIC/LOT L0T SIZE (includes 1/2 of R/W) DISTRICT µ - =a 36. Missy's Grill 36-C-7A less than 1 acre Whole Lot EC - 5 r 37. Gulf Station / Car Wash 36--C-7 I acre Whole Lot cc - 5 38, Car Wash / Store 37-A-1A 1 acre Whole Lot MC - 2 t =! 39. F & F Supply Co,, 37-A-3 3.5 acres Whole Lot WC - 2 :rt} U.S. Post Office, ,= _—EF3and-Heauty Salon,_— AndrewSs Flea Mkt. 40. Efland Knitting Mill 37-A-5,6 2.5 Whole Lot I _ 2 1 acres .F•^�� a 41, Central Feeds Inc. 37-A-I3 Less than 1 acre Whole Lot E f 42. Piedmont Services Inc. 37-A-12 Less than 1 acre Whole Let ., 43, Liner's Red & White Grocery 38-A-9,10 2,5 acres Whole Lot NC - 2 1 < +' 44, Service Station 39-A-1 I acre Whole Lot ' € ' 45. Jay's Hosiery Mill 40-A-5A Less than 1 acre Whole Lot zrT.- r; 46. Lil's Curiosity Shop 40-8-1A Less than 1 acre Whole Lot NC - 2 Y: t 'i 47. Campell Tare Co. 40-C-3 Less than i acre Whole Lot NC . 2 t 48, Exxon Station 40-E-11 Less than 1 acre Whole Lot EC - 5 49. Jerri's Grocery 43 - 20 1 acre Whole Let EC - 5 50. Store 43 - 32 34,75 acres 1 acre 2001 x 2001 EC - 5 51. Thies Kennel 43 -- 5 5.02 acres g 1 `•t,c,. [Spe6ial Use? ?= `" 52. Service Station 45 - 7 2 acres 250' x 175' EC - S 1 53. Service Station 'r 4S - H 2.42 acres All of lot East of S.A. 1120 SC - 5 59. Lloyd's Body Shop 45 - 17 2.46 acres 260' x 175' ECM 5 ilk 1 "-;•71=d 'k ` MAP TOTAL PROPOSED :•i SIZE of ZONING LOT WNING USE NO NAME OF USE BLK/LOT LIDT SIZE (Includes ljz of /W) DISTRICT 56. Cates Custom Meat 49 - 2 25.96 1 acre 2001 from NE { Processing E - I 57. Amer. Tole. & + A 54 - 16D 28.28 sores 1 adze 200' x 2001. A - R •- .�= Communications W of W property line " 41 (Special Use) j rJ., 750' N of S.R. 1120 _..---_...3_.__..-._...._50._ _._Y_Pa­lmer!s_Wsldi,ng-and ! Fix - It Shop yt; N line 20()' is s 59. Buckhorn Gun Shop 54 - 2A 18.73 ac. From M property tine EQ - 5 } 200' x 200' 60. Estate club 31-A-17 3 acres 200' x 200' W of E EC- 5 Property line, 200' 61. La-Caprice N of fiWY 70 ;.?t 2 acres 1 acre - EC - 5 Front portion of lot ✓1 i. �M j c. .et. ; 733 ORANZE COUNTY BOARD OF CalMISSION&RS Action. 'Agenda em , ACTM\I AGE-1\111; .1:11.A. ABSTRACT It 17o.&- p=m-G DATE November 1, 1982 Subiect: Planning Board Rules of Procedure • Departrrent: Planni Public Hearing: yes Attachment(s) : InfOrination Contact: Rick Cannity a) Rules of Procedure b) Changes included in the Rules phcalen,ra,x, 732-8181 EXT. 347 4-'11E: To consider approval of the Planning BOard Rules of Procedure as required by Section 2.2.6 of the Zoning Ordinance. NEED: The Planning Board has extensively revised its Rules of Procedure in conjunction with the revised Zoning Ordinance. The new ordinance requires that the Planning Board recommend approval of the Rules of Procedure and that the Board of Commissioners approve them. WICT: The Planning Board has spent considerable energy and time on the proposed revisions. The recommended Rules of Procedure are more comprehensive that the existing By-Laws. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Board recommends approval. -r7= 734 RULES OF PRDCEDIM PLANNING BOARD ORANGE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA SEPMBSR 1982 APPROVED BY BOARD ON 1982. Chairperson 73 RULES OF PROCEDURE ORANGE COUNTY PLANKING BOARD ' ARTICLE I - PURPOSE AND GENERAL RULES A. Puroose The purposes of the Planning Board shall be as set forth in the Orange County Zoning Ordinance, dated September 2, 1981, and other general and special state laws relating to planning in Orange County. The Planning Board shall have those powers and duties delegated by ordinance to the Board by the Orange County Board of Commissioners. The Orange County Planning Board is hereinafter referred to as the Planning Board. B. General Rules The Planning Board shall be governed by North Carolina General Statutes Chapter 153A and other general and special acts relating to planning and related activities in Orange County as well as by the ordinance which established the Board. ARTICLE II - OFFICERS AND DUTIES The elected officers of the Planning Board shall consist of a Chair and a Vice Chair. A secretary shall be appointed. A. Chair The Chair shall preside at all meetings and hearings of the Planning Board and have the duties normally conferred by parliamentary usage on such officers. The Chair may appoint or recommend the appointment of Board members as representatives to other official boards as the need arises. B. Vice Chair The Vice Chair shall serve as acting Chair in the absence of the Chair, and at such times shall have the same powers and duties as the Chair. C. Election Procedures The procedures for election of the Chair and Vice Chair shall be as follows: 1) These officers shall be elected by the Planning Board from among its members at the regular meeting in January of each year. 2) The candidate for each office receiving a majority vote of the Planning Board memebers present shall be declared elected. 73t: 0130 (,- 3) The officers shall, be elected for a term of one year. They shall be eligible to succeed them- selves for not more than three consecutive terms. 4) Vacancies in the office shall be filled immediately for the unexpired term by the regular election procedure. ARTICLE III - MEMBERS A. MEMBERSHIP Vembership on the Planning Board shall be governed by the terms of Chanter 153 of the General Statutes of North Carolina and the Orange Courty Zoning Ordinance. B. A.TIENDANCE 1) Any member of the Board Wno miss more than three consecutive meeting (monthly meeting on the third Monday) or public hearirgs or who miss more than one-half of the meetings in a calendar year, for something other than ar approved absence as deter- mined by the Chair, nay lose their status as member of the Board and may b replaced by the Board of (: - of Commissioners. 2) Absence due to sickness, death of an immediate family member, professional ',.eave, or other valid reason shall be considered approved absence and shall not affect the member's status. 3) In the event of a fang illness or other cause for prolonged absence, the member may be replaced. ARTICLE IV - AMINISTRATION A. The Orange County Planning Departrent shall serve as staff to the Planning Board. B. The expenditures of the Board, exclusive of gifts shall be within the amounts appropriated for that purpose by the Qrange County Board of Commissioners. C. The Planning Director may serve as Secretary to the Planning Board, However, if the Board desires, a Secretary may be appointed by the Chair of ,, the Board, either from within or outside its membership, upon approval by the Planning Board: The Secretary shall hold office during the term of the (, Chair and until a successor secretary shall have been appointed. He/she shall be eligible for reappointeuent. _ . , The Socretary, subject to the direction of the Chair and the Board, shP11 keep all minutes and records of the Planning Board, provide notice of the regular and special meetings to members, arrange proper and legal notice of hearings, attend to legal correspondence of the Board, and other such duties as are normally carried out by a secretary. If the secretary is chosen from outside the membership of the Board, he/she shall not be eliEl- ble to vote upon any matter. ARTICLE V - COMMITTEES A. The Planning Board may establish such standing or temporary committees as it may deem useful in its work. The members of these committees shall be appointed by the Chair of the Board. B. The Planning Board shp11 establish a committee on Ordinance Review which shall be responsible for a continuing review of ordinances re- lated to the business of the Planning Board. The members of this Committee shall be appointed by the Chair of the Board. ARTICLE VI - TOWNSHIP COUNCTLS A. The Planning Board shall recommend to the Board of County Commissioners the establishment and/or continuation of Township Advisory Councils, as provided in Section 2.2.11 of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance. B. An Advisory Council shall be established for each township. It will be composed of residents of that township, who shall serve a term of two Ar- years. Members of the Advisory Council can nominate new members, while any citizen of the County can recommend members for nomination. C. The members of the Councils shall be appointed by the Chair of the Planning Board upon approval by the Planning Board. D. A member of the Planning Board from each township shall serve as liaison to the appropriate Advisory Council. ARTICLE VII - MEETINGS A. Regular Meetings Regular meetings of the Planning Board shall be held the third Monday of each month at 7:30 p.m. at the Courthouse in Hillsborough or other place within Orange County designated by the Chair. The meetings shall adjourn not later than 10:30 p.m. unless extended for the meeting in session by vote of the Board. B. Special Meetings Special meetins may be called by the Chair or by the written request of at least three other members of the Planning Board. The notice of such a meeting shall specify the purposes of the meeting and no other business may be considered except by unanimous consent of the Planning O' Board memebers present. C. Meeting Notice The Secretary shall give three days notice for both regular and special meetings. • LI Except in extraordinary circumstances, there shP13 be a maximum of three meetings and/or hearings per month. D. Quorum (- A quorum shall consist of a najority of the regular appointed members of the Planning Board. A quorum shall be present for conduct of formal business. E. Voting The vote of a majority of those members present shall be sufficient to decide all matters before the Planning Board, provided a quorum is present. Ex-officio members shall not vote. 1) No Planning Board members shad participate in the decision of any matter in which they have a personal financial interest. 2) Each Board memeber shall vote yes, no or abstain. Members not voting shall be counted as abstaining. The Chair shall vote only to break a tie vote of the Board. F. Conduct of Meetings 1) Agenda. All business to be considered shall be listed on the agenda and to secure such consideration a request,therefore must be received by the Chair or Secretary at least seven days before any regular scheduled meeting. No other business may be considered except by unani- mous consent of the Board members present. All special business or items not specifically noted on the regular meeting agenda may be deferred by the Planning Board until the next regular meeting date. 2) Order of Business The order of business at regular meetings shall be: a) Call to order and roll call. b) Call for approval of minutes of previous meeting. c) Consideration of additions to the agenda. d) Consideration of items on the agenda. e) Adjournment. The order of business for special meetings shall be as set out in the meeting call. 3) Public Meetings. All meetings of the Planning Board, its committees and councils shall be open to the general public. The Planning Board shP11 have the power to meet in executive session concerning appro- priate procedural necessities are complied with as prescribed in North Carolina's Open Meeting Law, N.C. General Statutes S 143-318.1 to 143-318-7 (1974). ; 7•:;".;; 7 7. :7;!777;7',. " 73 0,0 G. Cancellation of Meetings 1:- Whenever there is no business for the Planning Board, the Chair may dispense with a regular meeting by g..-±gnotice to all members not less than twenty-four hours prior to the time set for the meeting. ARTICLE IFTT - JOINT PUBLIC HEARINGS Joint Public hearings, attended by both the Board of County Commissioners and the Planning Board, shall follow the procedures given below. A. Hearinm on Rezoninns and Other Hearin Conducted b the P1- Board Chair 1) Call of agenda items by the Chair. 2) Presentation by staff: a) explanation of the effect of the proposal b) staff recommendation. 3) Statements in support of the proposal. 1) Statements of opposition to the proposal. (- 5) Rebuttal statements by supporters. 6) Rebuttal statements by the opposition. 7) Board discussion. 8) Board action. Before beginning this procedure, the Planning Board may determine the maximam number of minutes to be allocated to each of the above items, with the constraint that supporters and opponents shall be given equal time. B. He- on Special Use Permits and other Hearin:. Conducted by the Commissioners' Chair. The hearings shall follow the procedures designated by the Board of County Commissioners. ARTICLE IV - APEROYETTS These Rules of Procedure may, within the limits allowed by law, be (:- amended at any time by an affirmative vote of not less than a majority of the regular appointed members of the Board, provided that such amendment shall have first been presented to the membership in writing at a regular or special meeting prededing the meeting at which the vote is taken. _ _ _ - | ` ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT BIUMWDROUGH NORTH CA.ROLINA, 27278 October 28,1982 THE RULES bF PROCEDURE TITLE change from By-laws to Rules of Procedure ARTICLE 1- pURPOSE AND GENERAL RULES PurpoSe changd from "as set forth in the Ordinance to Establish a Planning Board for Orange County dated February IT., 1977" to "as set forth in the Orange County Zoning Ordinance, dated September2, 1981" B. General Rules additibn of section ARTICLE II OFFICERS AND DUTIES change from "officers" to "elected officers" addition of ".. .A secretary shall be appointed." C. Election Procedures changelfrom "Election of Officers" to "Election Procedures" changelin 1) from "regular meeting in April" to "regular [meeting in January" ARTICLE III1- MEMBERS additiOn of section ARTICLE IV - ADMINISTRATION change from "STAFF" to "ADMINISTRATION" change1in C. from "The Planning Department shall provide !a Secretary. . . " to "The Planning Director may 'serve as Secretary to the Planning Board. However, the Board desires, a Secretary may be appointed , by the [Chair of the Board, either from within or outside its membership, upon approval by the Planning Board. The Secretary shall hold office during the term of the Chair and until a successor secretary 1 , 1 . 10/28/82 Page 2 shall have been appointed. He/she shall be 1 eligible for reappointment. ARTICLE V - COMMITTEES deletion of 2) Committee on Plat review from Rules of ; Procedure addition to B) ". . . The members of this Committee shall be appointed by the Chair of the Board." ARTICLE VI - TOWNSHIP ADVISORY COUNCILS change from "ADVISORY COUNCILS" to TOWNSHIP ADVISORY COUNCILS". change A. from " . . .as provided for in Section 10 of the Ordinance as establishing the Planning Board" to " . . as provided in Section 2.2.11 of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance", addition of sections C. and D. ARTICLE VII - MEETINGS addiion to A. Regular meetings of "each month at 7:30 pm" and The meetings shall adjourn not later than 10:30 pm unless extended for the meeting in session by vote of the Board." addition to C. ". . .Except in extraordinary circumstances, there shall be a maximum of three meetings and/or hearings per month. 1 addition of section D. Quorum addition to P.1) Agenda of " . .No other business nay be considered except by unanimous consent of the Board members present . . ." change 2)c) "Announcement of additions" to "Consideration Of Additions" ARTICLE VIII - JOINT PUBLIC HEARINGS addi ion. of section ARTICLE I1 - AMENDMENTS change ". . . vote of not less than a majority of the . • . ." to " vote of not less than majority of the regular appointed members" apar cz BO-ARO a" CaTC,5=MM ActiCn i.qenda ACTICN 'AGENDA. IT1 Itam NmpamEam mum November 1, T982 54±del=t: Purchase of heriffla vehicles and Animal Control Truck • Public Ef... .-14-1g: • attachltrant(S): InfOZoatiOn Contact: Mark H. Rees Roza Ntutec: 498 .e' To consider awarding the purchase of four Sheriff's vehicles and One Animal Control Truck to the lowest responsible bidder based on life cycle cost analysis., The opening of the bid was scheduled to be after the pre- paration of the agenda. Because of this the bid results are not included in this agendal item, but will be presented to the Board at the meeting of November 1, 1982, • Need: The vehic es purchased will be used as replacements for vehicles that are presently imrnout. or undependable. The old vehicles will either be declared surPlps or transfered to another department. „-• $50,000 has ben budgeted for the purchase of these vehicles. Tolaward the bid to the lowest, most responaible hIdder. c:; CCE,,":\+-MC 74 U h 9 BARD c ' CCWISSICOERS Agenda ACTIC7o.1 AGE,NDA. APSZ.Z-ICT Item y=7„m 021= November 1, 1982 --_-__---- StICsject: Purchase of Additional Mainframe Computer Equipment Purchasing & entre ervices Public Ilearirsg: yes Att24fm-mmt(s) : Bid results o rift=taticn C=Ttact: Mark H. Rees Plosure Nt.. c: 498 Purse: To consider awarding the purchase of additional Computer Mainframe equip- ment with accessories to Fulcrum Computer Group, Inc, of Raleigh, N. C. for the price of $148,497, this being the lowest, most responsible bid, The purchase is subject to approval by the Board of Commissioners of a Lease/Purchase agreement. _ _ •-• Need: The purchase of this additional Computer Equipment will eliminate over- crowding on the present system and allow for future expansion, A $52,500 credit due Orange County for sale of the Tax assessment program will be applied to the purchase price by Fulcrum Computer Group, The remaining $95,997.00 will be financed through a Lease/Purchase agreement over five years. RE.'cr .-"..24-7.-icn(s) : To award the bid to Fulcrum Computer Company subject to financing arrangements being secured under separate request to financial institutions. BID RESULTS Fulcrum Shebesta Associates One Microdata Sequ 1 with one megabyte memory Et operating software, 40 open ports, 4 prism IV's, one 4treaudng tape drive, one 600 LPM printer and 127 million bytes disc. $163,497.00 $180,400.00 Less trade in of ogle Microdata Reality with 96K memory, one 1600 BPT tape drive, one 300 LPM printer, 24 open ports and two 25 million bytes disc! ($15,000.00) (132,000.00) W8,497.00 $160,400,00 I _ ---, CiaN.7E ccum CF CS—.- * S Action Agenda Item Mo. 5-/D AL.1. 74 AGENDA Trai AESTPACT MCG a.a.a.7 November 1, 1982 Subject: Purchase of Front End Loader Refuse Truck Cepa=nult: Purchasin. 61 Central Services Pv27.aic Eearing: VES no - . Att.=,--7=lelt(s) : Bid results InformatLcn Contact; mark H. Rees Phone igum4-4=r: • PurTose: To consider awarding the purchase of a Front End Loading Refuse Truck to Simpson Equipment Corporation of Wilson, North Carolina for the price of $80,255.00, this being the lowest and most responsible bid. The purchase is subject to approval by the Board of Commissioners of a Lease/Purchase agreement. _ - The acquisition of this Refuse truck will greatly reduce problems associated with the County Sanitaiton program by reducing down time and allowing one of the older units to be used as a back up, 1.21=act: This purchase will result in the spending of $35,000.00 budgeted for the downpayment on this vehicle. A Lease/Purchase agreement for three years will be negotiated to handle the remainder of this cost, Rec=renc:etion(s) : To award the bid to Simpson Equipment Company subject to financing arrangements being secured under separate request to financial institutions. BID RESULTS 7 Simpson Cooper Carolina Specialty E ui emnt Kenworth Kabca Mack Waste Sauca Packer Body --- --- $30,615.00 only '-' $39,355,00 Cab & Cahsis -»- $53,878.00 --- $54,580.00 __- only Kenworth Mack I Packer Body $80,255.00 --- $83,115.00 --- $89,900.00 F $91,855.00 } Cab 6 Chasis White Truck White Truck Renwarth Truck White Truck E-Z Packer Leach Body Canadian Die t Dempster Body Body 35 yd. 35 yd. posal Body iI 38 yd. f. 36 cu, yd. I F 1 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agemas ACTIOM F DA. i'r2.1 ABSTRACT Item ho. 411 MEETiC DATE November 1, 1982 Subject: Appointments DepmrttnEnt: Board of Commissioners [Public H°wring: yes r Attachment(s): YES Information Contact: Paulette Pridgen-Pond Phone Number: 919/732-8181, ext, 510 PURPOSE: To maintain membership levels on various Boards, Councils and Commissions. NEED: Update 1. NURSING HOME ADVISORY COUNCIL: Effective December 31, 1982, five terms expire; all terms are for four yearsland expire simultaneously. Mr. Schramm's term (appointed in August) will expire December 31, 1986. Some members have indicated that they may not be able tD commit to another full, four year term. Would. the Board like to advertise these positions? 2. MENTAL HEALTH BOARD: Jan Pinney's term will expire December 31, 1982. He is eligible for reappointment.' Would the Board like to advertise? I understand that he would like to be reappointed. , NEED: Vacancies exist on the following Boards YOUTH NEEDS SERVICE TASK FORCE: There are currently 11 vacancies on this Task Force. Lane Cook is the new chair and has set up a subcommittee for a membership drive. Attached axe three resumes (Michael Bramble, Sarah Tillis and Linda Reifanyder) recomm nded for appointment by the subcommittee. Additionally, I am including the r�sume of Robin Wells also applying for this Task Force. COMMISSION FOR WOMEN: Attahced are resumes of Elaine Parker and Meg Kemper, recommended by the Executive Committee of this Commission. There are currently four vacancies on this Commission; additional interviews are scheduled for this month. HILLSBOROUGH PLANNING BOARD: The Hillsborough Town Board has recommended Ronald Wagner for the posiltion created (and expiring February, 1983) by moving Nancy Goodwin to the tern expiring February, 1987, his resume is attached as is the letter from the Town Clerk. ENERGY COMMISSION: The status has changed; there are seven vacancies out of .16 seats; of those, fop= are representatives from Chapel Hill'and Hillsborough and Chapel Hill-Carrborp and Orange County Schools.. Those entities are being contacted for recommendation to those seats, sr < 4,a.. ' = "� . :CMt`i"" ,�sin c i k t n' c�:" QCs f 3 .. ... _._. .. .. . ._. .. '? _ . 1. RESUME' " d1•"+. Name: ._ .}1 )/2.4c.�! 4)-4.--,10!...e._ Flailing Address _ C) ) e x. �' ' C f;a . 14 '11 /V( .�1 r' dip Dude 2`,.5-hr�' I • Telephone: 9 $_• /5-6.1 Hume R y.� ` &3 fo Business r -: Ethnic Backgr und: Black „ Indian White 1�''» Other Sex: Male V' ' Female Age: 2 Education: (Highest) •� G.� to GI4• sraGM 3 Occupation: 1 E e A., ,w V i r e I'm r•CG' ISaiiie Zsc. • Community Interests and Activities: J�/c,�dr d. �'..h�F.s�s :r '. , re... d- n r.f"-, Crc ri v2 i./an li ' L., e s..,o fG.. , t�;.k) re.r.+r ri or.. 1° — J^t+,'w+.,milt,r V rel l ,• _ // (� In lihich 'towpship do you reside?, .60.-e _.__ _, - (not app icable in some instances) - I am interested in serving on: Q rG<., . ��f o` + - . Neerir ask drove. • : — . • „Signature ( )11,44.1.9“.P V Return to: Clerk to the Board'of County Commissioners 'WS E. M rgaret t.ane Hillsborough, NC 27278 , • r ! y w.; • ../4 i t;".4 a i^rt .%;4 !;t �' y ! ' 1 4'4"14 i7 VC,ZIL4M4, !" ��•c«y r�` 1.01. L< • 1 i """..W._ ... -._....•. ......,.. ««_... ......i..swi.wNMirw:r.u.. - ._..-.r...«.+r.,....a.,,..».._..,.._,.. - ww-.s«-....«, .., . 'r:..'...._^:•_�..::i."a«. RESUME' , Name: Jara.4 /.f/,:s — •- -- r 333 ti .�/_ r SIB. Mailing Address: arac ,Ngvn1A.L_- - - • Zip Cade _d7.5.0.1 Telephone: (?/ ) 767.176.7 Nome (' i 5„126d71 Business White' ✓ Other R' Ethnic Background: Black �. Indian ,. Sex: !Male 1 Female vi Age: .3? '` Education: ,(Highest) ' A./..5% / • n,,x� Occupation: ,• , so . Ot. • !.,,, . ` .__C.,. - ,, « . ,/7/4 Q 1 Community Intl rests and Activities: Jr•Lroie Q. {/d' /t ,< .4 . de ft. Ceua , , SSa ¢Y{i o' a :.....ak.t 9 e.+er QS 'in which toqnship lo You reside? a a ,,, ' --- ." (not applicable in some instances) ., _ I am interested in serving on: ,I o .„44, ts'grv,'cPS ..46„. t..- } . _ _ 4 Date: 9/,yea_ _ Signature ; • . „ * Return to !cleric to the Board of County Commissioners • 106 R. M4rgaret lane [ Hillsborough, NC 27278 . 3 1 7 ' I ' J^ xn�YAS 1 I E RESUME' , Name: , -L./,Ur> i L . % ErrSp f y T)g"R . 1 Hailing Address: PO. &oK 30741 I P -7 L. ,u C,. -- Xt.. • - --r, Z0id C d3c)40 A)C.,- I•rriE. Zip Code 27 O • Telephone: • qb 2-2$27 Home q,..c -t4-a2- Business . - _ _ _ Ethnic. Background: Black Indian White _„,_ Other Sex: Male I Female K W... Age: 7,9 4.+: r Education: (Highest) N1.5.by : Occupation: )r — ite-As.bc•33 . 1/,5F • ' Community Interests and Activities: 1 +? : - -ASSoG, dC CraryMclrlr r ,Ru e 'c. w" --'6etra J 64 . - ,5.P�.e.e) " "lb. o /rA'cl5Tr7_-rli . - ... Na. A-Ati> 53. ° - f /; �;VST;`Lt1Cl't�/L � , JJU �!" C� ' U1�-� Via as abr>M r7fc=s•... .spect .'-fr40.16-<-:.Ts i.-:prep co. yoGlrri '�'e� In which township do you reside? (not applicable in some instances) -w i.E I am interested in serving on: (5 a T 'Cb., 0J'71 a.., S 7 -SK ro1LGC I • ,. ;� 11 . Signature , b.-41.,-(.. L . /c •LCAa ree4,C.. Rate: h-/7 � _ 9 i 6 I Return to: Cler.►k to the Board, of County Commissioners 1105 R, Margaret Lane Hillsborough, NC 27278 . . I { - RESUME NAME: Ak MAILING ADDRESS: a .„ A*, O.'Co.D. • - ZIP CODE: - TELEPHONE: 13,aa,5.11001E 57 k- gloo a BUSINESS t5c,hae1 ETHNIC BAICKGROUND: ELAC! iNDIAN WHITE OTHEH" • SEX: MA4E FEMALE AGE: EDUCAT/ON: (HIGHEST) /if OCCUPATION: ' •r• ■04* As6 4• -• 40 if I Imo COMMUNITY INTERESTS AND ACTIVITIES: - - eN 166 A- - 1. • ie 6,6 .11 • JLCe .4114.L.."S * CL . As dor 4 • • * • tt• ■\ • Aket,On't 4 IN . , IN WHICH TOWNSHIP DO YOU RESIDE? FolcvieL0 (nob applicable in some instances) I AK INTERESTED IN SERVING ON: \t LAN - 4114 •••••■••• ■■•■■•••WOOF*1.....**01..........1ww DATE: j())031\IS SIGNATURE RETURN TO Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners 106 E. Margaret Lane Hillsborough, N. C. 27278 • 7— .• 4-_ •4Nr.4..: - . ' - • - -"' - ' ;,, : 77.1:,;-•,,i • • RESUME NAME i Elaine Parker 1 MAILING ADDRESS Rt. 5, Box 102 1 Mebarxe, N.C. ZIPC CODE: 27302 TELEWONE:alga 1750 HOME 732-3976 BUSINESS ETHNIC' BACKGROUND': BLACK X INDIAN WHITE OMR SEX: MALE FEntr_ _ AGE: 44 EDUCTION: (HIGHEST) 18 e: OCCUPATION: Pune al Serv"ce COMMUNITY INTERESTS AND ACTIVITIES: Voter Re:•str-tio C COMMAl 'Os - eL e#: " :: b IN WHICH TOWNSHIP DO YOU RESIDE? Carr Communit i(not applicable in some instances) I AM INTERESTED IN SERVING ON:THE 0 - :e Co Commission omen DATE LA.LJ& SIGNATURE_64 (:;:24-16,-4./ RETURN TO: Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners 1 106 E. Margaret Lane Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 1 . , ^ ; • `^. RESUME NAME: hafeftiek MAILING ADDRESS: kit • A 44: . ZIP. CODE: /iF‘ • TELF.PHOrE: 942 urctgy IkO1E aa_' - 5 Busx17...p.1 -/NIAN WHITE .1.2. =di • ETHNIC rCKGROUND BLACK D: SEX: Mr.LE FEMALE AGE: .3..1 • EDUCATI6N: (HIGHEST) • k occupATpto.: p r CO141.111141 INTERESTS AND ACTIVITIES: 9./N:TE. Ur055 ClowbrreeNe' R'ffIx\ +. et)rtmitt.t.-• vAlievt\zen. illf\t4A2,1A 11`4,a91kli - . . • 111 • \I PA-C.iAr ke-Ift r■IN r 0 mak v■mtm....• )1\1 1A.5 *.t4, _tt • ro..o\i • - 1 * ** IN WHICH TOWNSHIP DO YOU RESIDE? . . (not applicable in some inatances) I AM INITERESTED IN SERVING ON: ea f‘cs,NN , cA\ Vi) omte:\ DATE: I , SIGNATURE: /01.•4:01., t 1 4 5.. 1 3 b.0 ()y Volvo& ci RETURN TO: Clerk to the Hoare-of County Commissioners 106 E. Margaret Lane Hillsborough, N. C. 27278 : , "--,••••••,•-• t ORANGE COUNTY 74 BOARD OF CORAISSIONEIG Action rqencla. • item ACTION AGaNIDA rxi T1BSTRACT rummG DATE November 1 1•* Subject: Budget Amendment Dparbrent: Finance Public Hearing: Yes x. no AtteChment(s): ye, ' Irlf0rnetinn Contact: Patricia Stutts _ PhOne Numbs= 919 732-8181 Ext. 495-- PURPOSE: To consider proposed budget amendment NEED: GENERAL FUND 1) Aging - To amend budget to accept additional grants and projected donations: The county match for federal grants will be met by transferring county dollars from other areas of Aging. No new county monies will be required. 2) Support Enforcement - To amend revenue to reflect decrease in reimbursement from Federal Financial Participation. 3) Recreation - Ta amend budget to reflect additional revenue from State Fair trip for senior citizens. _ 4) To amend budget to reflect encumbrances carry-forward. EMS CAPITAL PROJECTS To appropriate fund balance per original project estimate. IMPACT: GENERAL FUND 1) Aging - Increase in revenues available; no additional county funds required. 2) Support Enforcement - Decrease in federal revenue that will be covered thru contingency. 3) Recreation - Increase in revenue. 4) Provides funds to cover encumbrances carried forward at 6-30-82. EMS CAPITAL PROJECTS Increase in available revenues. RECOMMENDATION:. APPROVAL • !, ; ORANGE COUNTY PROPOSED ). 1982-83 BUDGET AMENDMENT The 1982-83 Budge:: Ordinance of Orange County as adopted on June 22, 1982, and subsequently amended, is hereby amended as follows: GENERAL FUND: 1) Appropriation: Aging $ 5,398. Source: Aging - Title II-A National Older Americans Volunteer Progarms (RSVP) 850. Aging - Title IIIB Grant 3,042. Aging - In-Home Grant 406. Aging - Donations - Title III 1,000. Aging - Donations - In-Home 100. (To receive additional federal grants and to set up expected donations.) 2) Appropriation: Support Enforcement Grant (3,600.) Contingencies (3,600.) ( To account for effect of 5% reduction in Federal FinAncial Participation in the Child Support Program.) 3) Appropriation: Recreation 100. Source: Reci'eation Fees 100. (To budget for additional: revenue generated by unscheduled fee-charge trip.) 4) Appropriation: Fund Balance - Reserve for encumbrances (40,940.) Commissioners 290. Register of Deeds 5,650. County Manager 55. Personnel 483. Tax Supervisor 120. Revenue 60. Planning 3,978. Health 9,273. . - 771 088- Proposed Budget Amendment Page 2 4) Appropriation: (continued) Agriculture Extension 7. Recreation 2,705. Aging 235. Sheriff 134. Emergency Services 1,901. Public Works 6,401. Miscellaneous Public Wqrks 9,598. (To appropriate encumbrances at June 30, 1932 as reflected in the 1982-83 financial statements.) Adopted this / day of irkti2 1982. 772 • • ,0&9 ORANGE COUNTY PROPOSED EMS CAPITAL PROJECTS ORDINANCE AMENDMENT The 1981-82 Project Ordinance of Orange County as adopted, and subsequently amended, is hereby amended as follows: Appropriation: EMS Capital Outlay, Building $16,000. Source: Appropriated Fund Balance 16,000. (To appropriate fund balance in EMS Capital. Projects Fund per original, project estimate.) Adopted this day of 1982. 4 7'73 0��� ORANGE COUNTY ' - BOARD 07 CcMISSIw*eRS Action Agenda Item No' Addendum ACTION AGENDA ITE-1uBSzRACT ;ziEr= [g]ENovember 1, 1982 subject; Resolution Bo d of Commissioners [Public Hearing: yes x^ no ----- Attachment(s): Izzozmation Cootaot: Mr.. Whitted or Yes, Resolution Mr. Kittrell ` Pbcooerwsober: 732-8I81 ext. 510 or 425 PURPOSE: Consideration of a Resolution opposing proposed amendments to Regulations governing the Comunity Development Block Grant Program' NEED: There has been a proposed major policy change in HUD's interpretation of the Community Development Block Grant Program. The goal of the CDBG program remains the "development of viable urban communities, including decent housing and a suitable living environment, and expanding economic opportunities, principally for persons of low- and moderate- income." The three objectives of the CDBG program are: elimination of slums and blight; meeting CD needs of particular urgency; and conducting CD activities which principally benefit low- and moderate- income facilities. In recent years, all community development programs have given thaximum priority to low- and moderate- income benefit. Under the proposed new regulations, CD projects would be required to address only one of the three objectives. According to the Community Development Digest, (No. 18-18, September 28, 1982)' "Only one of these objectives requires benefit to lower income persons. The uthers...could presumably offer little or no measurable assistance to poorer residents. ..There is still debate over whether the purpose of the CDBG program is served by lessening emphasis on activities that benefit lower income persons.. '." These regulations will become effective in February, 1983, unless Congress offers objections during the comment period. MIPACT; There is a stong possibility that the will lose its Congressional support if the thrust of the program changes in accordance with the pro- posed amendments. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution. If the Board adopts the Resolution, the Chair should be directed to write a letter to the Chair of the House Housing Sub- committee, Mr. Gonzalez (D-Texas) and include the Resolution; copies of the letter and Resblution should be forwarded to Congressmen Andrews and Fountain and Senators Helms and East and President Reagan. ' ��sA�GE COUNTY Room ---------- --- 09]L 106 EAST MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGH, N. C. 27278 IUCHA=^WNmEO,=_ p"RM=ovn^VE=° SHIRLEY,.MARSHALL NORMAN WALKER DO"WI""OTT RESOLUTION OPPOSING PROP0SEDAMENDMENT3 TO REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the primary objective of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 is 'The development of viable urban communities, by providing decent housing and suitable living environment and expanding economic opportunties, principally for persons of low-and moderate-income"; and WHEREAS, use of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program in Orange County has resulted in substantial improvements to housing, public facilities, public services and economic opportunities for persons principally of low- and moderate-incomes in the targeted communities; and WHEREAS, we the Board of Comthissioners offlrange, COunty, North Carolina view the Community,DeVelopment- adk,Grant-program as 67:popular, highly effective programWhi0=qsseh:STiffik:Lto.,,Jocal_needS; and WHEREAS, Vme t =7to ! t` the COmmunity Development Block Grant prn ram pr ' � h�� h Dep rtment'o�Housing and Urban Development ( ^ ' dpb]'isbed,in th-0-7F'egeral- Regfiter.on October 4, 1982 would relieve s ofthe obligation to spend:mostof their CDBG funds on projects *hickhene income'liersons; and '�� WHEREAS, d�}��th 6hSed �� bhwoad HUD woad no: lnnger view local CDBG programs to assure principal benefit to low- and moderate-income persons; and WHEREAS, the effect of the proposed regulations may be to dilute the effectiveness of the CDBG program in meeting the needs of low- and moderate- income persons, violating the statutory purpose of this program; and WHEREAS, the Orange County Board of Commissioners is aware of tremendous needs, such as substandard housing, lack of adequate water and sewer facilities, absence of needed public services, lack of economic opportunities and other needs facing low- and moderate-income persons in this area as well as in other areas of our nation; and WHEREAS, the Orange County Board of Commissioners supports continuation of the Community Development Block Grant program to address such pressing needs; ---_-- _ NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Orange County Board of Commissioners opposes the changes proposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development and recommends that the Community Development Block Grant program benefits continue to be ta eted for persons principally of low- and moderate-income. �, This the / day of November, 1982. Richard E. Whitted, Chair Orange County Board of Commissioners - ----- -'-- — ---- -- --'- ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Room No. 12 106 E^orMAEo^uzrLANE HILLSBOROUGH, N. C. 27278 RICHARD E.WHETTED,Chaim.= NORMAN""===°p SHIRLEY E.MARSHALL NORMAN WALKER w*='uwon RESOLUTION OPPOSING PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the primary objective of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 is "The development of viable urban communities, by providing decent housing and suitable living environment and expanding economic opportunties, principally for persons of low-and moderate-income"; and WHEREAS, use of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program in Orange County has resulted in substantial improvements to housing, public facilities, public services and economic opportunities for persons principally of low- and moderate-incomes in the targeted communities; and WHEREAS, the wethejloard of Corriiiissioners ty, North Carolina view the Community .DeWopment-BIZ,Grant-prograw4 pulnr, highly effective prograrm,whi045-seii-Ottil:local_needsand, WHEREAS,' ty Development Block Grant prograrno000edby:...the U-S .Department:.07-Housing and Urban Development .(HUDPftCpubliShied:'in' thede_ral7Regfiter4n October 4, 1982 would relieVe lbea”tieS of_theobTigafibn- to spend.",thestof their CDBG funds on projects Wh4clibe-nefittand MOderate-incomePersonS; and WHEREAS, iir5IP=thereld -fiegUlatJeds HUD Wou:rd'no: longer view local CDBG programs to assure principal benefit to low- and moderate-income persons; and WHEREAS, the effect of the proposed regulations may be to dilute the effectiveness of the CDBG program in meeting the needs of low- and moderate- income persons, violating the statutory purpose of this program; and WHEREAS, the Orange County Board of Commissioners is aware of tremendous needs, such as substandard housing, lack of adequate water and sewer facilities, absence of needed public services, lack of economic opportunities and other needs facing low- and moderate-income persons in this area as well as in other areas of our nation; and WHEREAS, the Orange County Board of Commissioners supports continuation of the Community Development Block Grant program to address such pressing needs; • � ��� ` _ _ 750 _ _ ' _ - - NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Orange County Board of Commissioners opposes the changes proposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development and recommends that the Community Development Block Grant program benefits continue to be targeted for persons principally of low- and moderate-income. This the day of November, 1982' Richard E. Whitted, Chair Orange County Board of Commissioners . . •