Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 09-27-1982 • ','■ ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 1982 7:30 P.M. SUPERIOR COURTROOM, ORANGE COUNTY COURTHOUSE HILLSBOROUGH,_ NORTH CAROLINA _ A. BOARD COM. ENT'S B. AUDIENCE COMMENTS 1. Matte 's on the printed agenda 2. Matters not on the printed agenda C. MINUTES. June 22nd, 28th and September 21 , 1982 D. JOINT PUBLIC HEARING WITH ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD 1. Proposed Amendments to the Adopted Land Use Plan for Cheeks Township 2. Consideration of Extension of Zoning into Cheeks Township E. MATTERS FOR BOARD DECISION 1 . CETA Letter of Intent 2. Housing Rehab Awards F. REPORT: HEADSTART 58 6 g �_` � MINUTES SEPTEMBER 27, 1982 The Orange County Board of Commissioners met in regular session on Monday, September 27, 1982, at 7`3O P.M. in the Superior Courtroom, Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina. Commissioners present: Chairman Richard E. Whitted, and Commissioners , Norman Guotavesnn, Shirley E. Marshall, Norman Walker and Don Nillhoit, Chairman Whitted said the Board would hold the Joint Public Hearing with the Orange County Planning Board prior to the other items|on the agenda. Orange County Planning Board Members present: Pat Crawford, Chair, and Tom Bacon, Sally Boericke, Logan Irvin, John Kizer, Sharlene Pilkey, David Shanklin, Carl Walters and John Wilson. According to procedure, Ms. Crawford chaired the joint public hearing. I. Proposed Amendments to the Adopted Land Use Plan for Cheeks Township Mr. Fred Luce, Planning Staff, presented the proposed amendments to the Land Use Plan for Cheeks Township (details are on page .3~90 of this book). Planning Board member Irvin asked if Mr. Luce felt this plan provided adequate protection to the Seven Mile Creek and if any thought had been given to construction of a berm or a drainage canal to shunt water runoff from the highways (Interstate 85 and US 70) away from Seven Mile Creek in order to preserve it as a future reservoir? Mr. Luce replied that since the original plan was conceived, new information from the State regarding a possible reservoir at Corporation Lake said such a reservoir would provide about the same amount of water as a reservoir on Seven Mile Creek. This would, in turn, provide an additional amount of land for development in the Seven Mile Creek watershed. He continued that a berm or canal had not been consid- ered as the problem did not exist. Mr. Irvin asked if consideration had been given to the concept of an industrial park for development rather than the "node" concept which would include a general aviation a:rport. Mr. Luce said such a concept had not been specifically examined; however, an industrial park would have to have water and sewer available to it and such ser- vices don't presently exist. He added that such a park would be located very near 587 -; the activity nodes as presently defined. Transportation, Mr. Luce added, is con- venient in these areas, being at or near both 1-85 and US 70, Planning Board member Kizer asked how many gallons of water per day were supplied by existing reservoirs to Orange County. Nr. Luce replied approximately four million gallons per day by existing reservoirs and Cane Creek, if built,would supply ten million gallons per day and Seven Mile Creek, if built, an additional six and a half million gallons per day. Ms. Crawford asked for public comments, Mr. Ben Lloyd, Route 1, Efland: Said that what is proposed tonight is not what the Cheeks Township Advisory Council recommended. He said the Advisory Council had asked that the entire corrider between 1-85 and US 70 be designated industrial/commercial and that such development not be limited to certain "nodes." He said this concept of "nodes" was a major concern of Cheeks residents, that it left no place for development to occur. He suggested a linear zoning concept which would encompass the entire corrider formed by 1-85 and US 70' There were no other public comments either for or against the proposed amendments ! to the Land Use Plan for Cheeks Township. 2. Extension of Zoning Into Cheeks Township Mr, Rick Cannity, Acting Planning Director, provided the Boards with back- ground on the extension of zoning into Cheeks Township. Mr. Cannity cited a list prepared by the Planning Staff on non-residential uses currently in Cheeks Town- ship. There were no questions from the Boards and Ms. Crawford asked for public comments, Mr. Lloyd: Said he was opposed to the extension of zoning into Cheeks Town- ship. He suggested waiting until the new Planning Director was in place before considering this question, He said he is in favor Of "good land use planning" but he would work againt it as long as it is "unreasonable'" He is opposed to the "node" concept of zoning, he wants zoning in a linear form. He cited two recommendations of the Water Resources Task Force Report, R O and 10, and said _ he didn't know what standards would be required for development in Seven Mile Creek Watershed with regard to 8; and for 10, he said there had been no sig- nificant change with regard to water'and sewer extension to Seven Mile Creek, wily a semantic change. He referred to the petition against zoning which he had presented at the October 6, 1981, public hearing on the extension of zoning into Cheeks Town- 588 3�� ship and said the number of signatures had increased since that time. There were no other public comments and Ms. Crawford returned the meeting to Chairman Whitted. Chairman Whitted referred, as is the usual practice, the matters on the public hearing to the Planning Board to consider and make a recommendation back to the Commissioners; he declared the public hearing adjourned. Following a ten minute break, the Board of Commissioners resumed deliberations on the announced agenda items (all members were present). A. Board Comments There were none. B. Audience Comments There were none. C. Minutes Commissioner Gustaveson moved, seconded by Commissioner Nillhnit, to approve the Minutes of June 22, 1882, as corrected. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, O. Commissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Gustaveson, to approve the Minutes of June 28, 1982, as submitted. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, O. Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall , to approve the Minutes of September 21, 1082, as submitted. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, 0. E. ITEMS FOR BOARD DECISION 1. Title II-B Program: The County Manager told the Board that Congress had not passed enabling legislation to continue the program;however, certainty is 00% in favor of its being continued. Commissioner Whitted asked Mr. Mangum, CETA Director, if the State was a partner in this funding of Federal programs with County money while awaiting Congressional nctionY Mr. Mangum responded yes, that the State will provide thirty days of "phase out money" should the program be discontinued and that would permit the County to recover its expenditure. Commissioner Walker moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall , to approve the attached budget amendment providing the funding, conditioned upon the County advancing the funds one month at a time for this Federal program, as recommended by the County Manager. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, O. 2. Housing Rehab Awards: Commissioner Gustaveson moved, seconded by Commis- sioner Whitted, to award the contracts to: Gates Construction for units I/ 14, 54, and 88 ($9,377; $ 7,537; and $10,716, respectively), Taylor Home Improvement for unit 11 100 ($6,255)2B) and Temco Construction for unit W 145 ($6,355), During discussion concerning the awarding of the contract to the second low- est bidder for unit R 14, Commissioner Gustaveson amended his motion, with Commis- 8S .' .,, . sioner Whitted assenting, to exclude unit # 14 from the motion and to suggest the | the estimate given for the rehab work be re-examined and, if needed,that the u` 't be rebid. Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, 0. (Complete bid results are on pages .) F. REPORT--HEADSTART The County Manager provided a report to the Board on the status of the Head- start program in the Cnunty. He said Wake Opportunities would begin the program on the next day, as scheduled; the regional office of the US Department of Health and Human Affairs in Atlanta, he added, had said that Wake Opportunities may operaite the program beyond the December 31, 1982, date given previously in order to facilitate smooth transition of the program and provide for careful screening of the sponsors' i ' program submissions. The Manager said the Regional Office would welcome an endorseL ment of programs submitted by prospective sponsors by the Board of Commissioners, There was a consensus that a list of proposals submitted (with copies of ttu ' proposals) was crucial to the Board's decision for endorsement of a particular sponsor. The Board said it was fairly firm on the proposal it may endorse containing i a classroom, at least one, in the Chapel Hill-Carrboro area. ; With no further business to come before it, Commissioner Gustaveson moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, to adjourn the Board of Commissioners' meeting for September 27, 1982' Vote: Ayes, 5; noes, O. Richard E. Whitted, Chair Paulette Pridgen-Pond, Clerk ' + . _ =- ' _ oaac� c:arzL nc�innz��cua z��, m`' n-1 a��N ��� �� ���� DoETzs� oA/Z September 27, 19E32_' INDEX SEPTEMBER 27, 1982 TOPIC ACTION PAGE | Pu01 �� ^ P for Amends. �� , 2�3 Zoning �xt_�x. i Cheeks None 1-2 _ nto " Minutes June 22, 1982 Approved/corrected 3 June 28` 1982 ,1 /submitted 3 Sept. 31, 1982 " is 3 Title [I-8 funding for 30 days approved 3 Huusjng Reh b Lawndale excluded; all 3-4 others approved Received; Board wishes Report—Hna start to receive ve oopies of proposals 4 0 UU •I ■ . . OR.h.Y.GF, 0.0M•737.{ . . . BOARD OF CONIISSIONERS Item rd: AC.C.I01. i,C,7.7.T.1::‘ I'17-21. i .S'17.?..F‘.C.0 rit.d.A2ING DATE'. September 27, 1982•,_ 5,41:0..ic'' '':: Proposed Amendments to the Mooted Land Use Plan for Cheeks Township . _ 177--,...._. Planiil. g 1 1 Public I( oring r. _ x y,t2s r:o • ., . . • .-------- Proposed Amprndment flap ormation Contact Fred Luce "b) r-lanutes of the Cheeks Township Advisory Council Inf : Phone. IN'cryber: 732-8181 EXT. 346 PURPOSE DD consider the proPosed arp_ndments to the adopted Land Use Plan for Cheeks Township. The proposed amendments tri. the Land Use Plan would add a Corare. rcial/industrial transition activity node centered on the intersection of 1-85 and !'t. iliLlincr Road (SR 1120) . The existing ten year transition area would be extended south of Efland to include the area bounded on the north by the ridgeline dividing the Iv'ca:Jwan Creek and Seven !‘,Iile Creek sub-basins, on the eat by Dewey Road (SP. 1146) and West Ten Road (SR 1144) , on the south by Seven Mile Creek,and on the west by Watson Road (SR 1320) and Thompson Road (SR 1377). The existing _ twenty year transitiOn area west of Efland would be extended to include an area bounded on the north by 1-85,Industrial Drive (ER 1374) and the ridge- line dividing Seven Mile Creek and :''cGowen Creek sub-basins, on the east by s7atson Road (SR 1320) and Thompson Road (ER 1377), on the south by Bowman Road (SR 1142) and West Ten Road (SR 1144), and on the west by Rock Quarry Road (SR 1143) . 1/TACT: The proposed amendment to the Land Use Plan would add an additional 2794 acres of transition area and approximately 245 acres appropriate for commercial and industrial activity. The amendment would address concerns of Cheeks Township _ residents regarding the availability of development areas. RECOPF.EMPTION: The Planning Staff r.ecormends approval. • ,i .'4...2?... r•` ?; rte,.,µ • a �yx:a .r. 60„ ' � ' 3,.;'111` `, --.. . e+4 �. A, • \ : 3;r,,,,,,E,..,..,,' s , ..s.r.,,:::::: .., 'P r''''' '.: L'!.t..41-4.4.4,:•Ii7;- , • 4.,:tir:1:,-,•::t•;:i °c nS "{x n y tlz J E. )LMI'Za 1 Ja Mp /"�< --"-r"14-,-.7-7,'"11;F:5•‘Ii•. 4 4t :ii4T y it X .��f1w4., 44,7 .,4...."..-r.... 4., " . +N -,. .0?).\\, \ --W.,',,,.,„, _,. ar a 4..J na .yam--^ 11=9 .:, . , ...• .,-. . Y KlAlV 1 rg:Z '''l.; "1 ; '.i'.....i''., ''''e■tL:' ' �•^' vca `,'a i t;�,; 5.'r ,,.� ':1 c '.ia ,B,h. 1342 r...:.—. - ,rte.. 1u1 .;J t. t a . i � rM. T q L ■ q Y • 4101 .„.„.. l I; t� .•''.-o Q O r+• n lT n ACP t.O b s: Ga /f.� r. 1 / y 1 .r=" I/ n 1J!ON �1 i• r 1 1 '< ©a1K S1' I" •• i T� ., Wit• Mx `��, I Gr_ �,'1 ,, Vii,`-i k Ilt l^ —''� s∎ M ll `. ~r ( as H ��l • -c,/ • h i `� Eft ✓ r' ✓ F = f � f1 � / i1C itr( '. . _ ,-." _ ` _._—.......---. .. ____ ............________ • • • - - • , ' ; • •0g COLIN a 'ECNARO OF Ca 3-LISS I0-.,tERS Item No_ 0-2 ACrIoN Irral ,1851.77-ACT bATE. September 27, 1982 5122.-t2ct: Extension of Zoning Ordinance to Cheeks Township D.-.o,amnant: ' Planning 1 PUblic Hearing: X yes • Triformat_ion Contact: Rick Car r 7.P.,tt.:E.c:Itwa7t(s): List of proposed zoning - classificationS:pg. Illorp. m-a -r- 732-8181 PURPOSE: To receive citizen input and comments on the extension of the Zoning ,Ordinance to Cheeks TownShip, The Board of Commissioners approved zoning of Chapel Hill Township in 1967, Eno in 1970 and Hillsborough and Bingham in 1981. Extension of zoning to Cheeks Township was delayed to this point to allow more time for considering watershed protection measures. A Public Hearing concerning extension to Cheeks Township was held • October 6, 1931, . Some of the recommendations of the Water Task Force Report have already been adopted and others will be discussed at this meeting. Previous Planning Board recommendations were to delay application of zoning to Cheeks Township. These recommendations were made on December 30, 1980 and October 19, 1981. INPACT: Zoning is a means of property protection either within or outside of a watershed. It enables growth take place in those areas that are best suited to handle it. Moreover, it permits a blending of new land uses with those already in existence. Cheeks Township contains watersheds which are the sources of drinkable water supply. Zoning would provide an additional means of protection for these watersheds. .71COnENDATIOJ: Planning Staff recommends extension of zoning to Cheeks Township, 0 i!J '4 .. :.•.:: _. ..... H H H H. H H. H. C to VI ... 1..1 10 H 0 1.0 to -0 to 01 .G (..1 DJ H. to • ..71 z 0 n to Cr -. (0) SI i, if = . 0 .z.. = 9 ti, n c-i .71 Z ) 1-.., 0 0 7.- 11 0 1.... H 00 1-... 7 Cr -'.. 'XI 7 0. 11 7 Cr 13' 0 O12) 7 7 G 0 0 - 1-r ..,.. o s'. 0 .4 Dr 0 as 1-d < C D L11 '7 X‘ .0 0 CD -Fi ' -- - P fD 0 0 0 0 0 0" 0 rp 0 V1 ti- o- in .-3 in L4 ri 00 ED = p, 0 P P 1-, 0 0 0 P 11 r. I-'" o in o .-C '4 .--3 0 tO 0 t'• o ":" 11 P --, ... 1-3 0 10 0 C' R; 0 17.- 0 < ID UT 0 IA 0.1 0, 0 l'-'• UI H 0 DI 11 Or-' ts .4 H 0 0 ■< cn 0 ..• P 0 K (PH CD fst, Cr tl u" 0 o Cr ir1 (1) /-.., 1,- 0 Di F G t7 O ,11 0 LG rr VI 0 .0 R II Cr .-s ffl 0 el 0 CI' F 7 7 La i... 0 1.11 0 0 0 to 1-i 0 rr ..,, ED 0 a 0 V 0 0 P 0'. 0 11 I-. 0 °11 12-1 '0 ID 0 Ii Cr O 0 0 0 (P0 DJ ra Cr rt .4 5 i< • 0 '0 (C Cr 21 CD Z I-., I- II w li to 4 ta En ...-i .r.. '.< in to cer 0 7 Da La 111; 0 0 fD 7 0 1,^ 1... O 0 11 Cl )-,, '0 0 a a 0 0 4 0 e• .- H., • 0 *;7. O n H 0 ia. E t. E N1 10 N.) DJ DJ NJ !V DJ 1--. 1,..) Ns 10 H H H ID C1. 01 tO 1-3 (.. 7:1 CD fJe V. tn ln U'e ul H A en (..) A 1--. 0 t' 7 1 I I pc x I I .1 1 I r I I 1 1 I I I I I N.. /-■ 1.4 Ls) (-, .0 10 NJ NJ H. 1...) 0 01 H H H H DJ H to UI C) 411. 0 10 H ■4 DJ fas 0 G. Ni DJ cn . . -H '0 .----; • CD 7 7 -4 6. -75,■:: to' r g g g g H N1 or 1., to -a ri 0 CO to • H Is.3 Ns 1-• S 2 Pq r u, in tit in in .0. 03 or fo o 0 in • i.n 1-5 r-3 ., .. P rt• it rr rr 0 ili 1-1 ID CD 5 0, et n 0 0 .__ H • C O 11 al, P P P 0 11 VI P.1 • Ps 0 0 11 1-4 ra 0 !: O 0) 1.11 co Ill in . ED H H H 1-• r 1-, in '44 • r.... - P PI Ps P 0 0 ,,- • • • 1- ; ow '•') - - H to 5 H . 5 z ts.) g Es H I-h 1-1 0, ..-. En 1.• 1.-i .. 0 -I 0 .... 0 0 0 0 tal HOC) 0 CI 0 10 DI 0 0 00) HO HH1-. H -. H - H to 0 I-• 13 0 4 0 - H 0 rn _ P ID H ID CD CD fa 0 NJ ID fD +I 11 ID 0 • • 0 r en 0 ED n X 01 0 ti to VI X .. . • 5 5 5 0 E. • ti) ri n o at. t-, - tn 5 . . :...q --.. 0 U1 0 0 1- .D. NI rr r Cr rt Cr Et i--, • rt UI Cr ti 0 r( H 0 n to 01 IA N7 --I 0 rr vl 0 01 I-- - OH 0 010 0 4. - 0 Otr) 1-.1 1-- tn P.1 HZ ; - - - 0 HI ea ED 0 D • n *4. H C) 01 It) ED ED • EU Z i• Z Z X -, In 0 la 11 11 • 0 .. 0) 0 tv --, o E.J a. x w o b 1-11 H +1 0 • to - • 0 1,..1 0 U' 0 1.4 )-3 - U' H 0 t/11--, 01 1) 0 0 HI 1-''. H 0 -:,.....' -.4 VI - 0 0 0 0 P1 ,.P. C.17 I-n ils a a tn ro ;EJ al CO 11 7:I Vs ..., 0 b ! H - 0 La .o. co 1.....1 .--- ..72 2 2 2 Z 2 2 2 C) Crt to tn trt el > - a E.,1 ,ct n n n n n n 0 0 0 n n 0 0 n tn 6 1 H o z a :T7 En z e' i I I I I t I I I I I I t I 0 ■-•3 H Z 01 DJ Ni N) DJ ha DJ N.1 .1:,. VI Li U1 01 tri 0 H GI CP .--. 0 n , • En 0 I-3 PJ 10 0 ' 1... 0 '7 O 0 P n- o_ 0 1... 11 1-• 0 o o c HI VI CD .-3 ht C . 0 n Cr . - . . . ., . . . , . , . .. . , ' . . . . , • _ . . . ... 594 . . . ,. 9; l' . ... E 14 Li LI (.4 1.4 LI N.) N3 NJ N) NI N) M IV M /..) i--. l-, H 0 1 P. 1....1 r.) H 0 D CO --I cr, in 4, (0, to 0 0 Co -4 • • • • . • • 2... 0 M In U3 Z 0 X 0 0, in M X 2, ,.. 5 R.-■ n r ., ..... (,) ›, = 0 0 , ) P r1 PI 11:7 1-1 H I-li, rr CD 11) 0.I I.... H 0 r--, tal NN II PI n P 0 P. P In Cl I-I Dirt Cl M n ,0 c.n II n 7 }-, ri 0 II, P Di • rt rt- •*.,- 0 0 rt. rt• 5 PP. 'CD P I < U 0 r. Ni FI Ni 1-', 0 CO IL) 0 CO 0 I-"' H D, C Ti CD P o 1-- ri- o a La '< 0 2 CD rr P. 0 rn 0 21--' P l-' c) Ni Cl) 0 0 0 11 (D CD (I) 0 CD ›, rI "7' 0 20 a H Cr H. 0- CD 0 tin H M O 1-1 n ..(5.-,. l'ir .1-1 Hz 11 1-1 0 1-- P CI I-I, Ill H 7 - O t-1 P. n t G) 0 U) CD D. < .-3 H 0 I-, Ni C O (D >, In 7 1-, III 0 W 0 I-. rl 1-,- 11 I-I Cl P Cn C H 7 1-,^ ill H 2, 0 rs tn .CJ - P 0 G - • 5 Di MI O H 0 (D PI 1.-,- Ni HI)) ,c) CD C) In O P ri- H Cl 0 , .1:1 cr 2, 0 0 W &' B. , H ...< rr ,Z1 Ca NE (0 CD En In U) Cl .-C C) GI 0 c c I-,- ,0 0 0" ri- n H 0 O ID 0 X II O ID SD l'S 0 P.I P 0 0 (f) 0 r- 1-,- 0 R■ L Pa 0 1) 1-1 rt • n 1) < - 1-, n • X HI) .0 In H rr P 0 ■-.. 5 H Lc, In CD 0 It '0 In C) 0 CO 'H H- P1 0 ti 0 rt. CD Lt) ID Ni I-. 0 ti O r) H Cl. n It) 1--" tn o C) o- • 0 o la ca 1.4 (...) E...r LA) 14 u.., t..., la I..., La N) N.) NJ m to NJ fs, M m X cr, cr, cr. 01 br:. .4. H F-, H 0 0 'JD co 10 COCO COMO CO . .. I I I I : I 7 7 7 7. I I 7 T i l I T I I 1 1 C i 1 I I 1 I ---,.. I I 1 1 1 o:1: F-. C) La NI CO 0 (4 ID 4).. H 4,. H m -1 ts., i4 c., m r,..) m 0 x 0 - 0 0 7 at GI C) -,1 Ln H H m r3 M 0 = L.J 0 n H H 1-, re to mt-I N) H 0 H gs cn t...) LoPHiDgIN 8 g ID • • -4 H DI P Ni 1,) In 111 P In 7 Ni SW P Gr% • P to tn (a .-.... C) 0 in u) In C) 0 -4 0 In 0 0 .,:z. 0 In H M rl .1 1-1 Ii r1 ti 7 in vi Di .in C) CD rt. 0 rt• (TI fl," Di co 5 in ...4 0 (11 0 rr P H ✓ P 0. ur in Ni H 0.1 -ri'- - n to ) 11,4, . TI) 1-s P.1 CD a) 0 H ti) P CD (1) 0 Ni H co (ii /-1 o in CD 0 - a LI) TO ID 0 1-, H H Ni 1-. P, P P P 0 0 0 C) Ii It i-t t-, - ID CD co C) 1-3 , I-, Z 1-, 5- H H Z LI E r..3 &' g § g i7.4: 0 ••••• 0 in • VI 0 ;A o 5 o 5 N O• 0 rt 0 p, 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 H H P H 0 H 0 H H H H ., m 0 .D. H H I-• H 0 t)) CD ID H CD • ft, • 0 CD CD CD P 141 . VI P (1) (11 M 0 l•-• X 0 0 0 n a o 5 5 2, 5 174 5 -C.12! 5 5 5 5 P-t LI CD 0 5 5 5 5 p.M 0 rr C? rr 0 Cr rr Cl- rr rr 0 111 t.3 Z Z rr rr CD rr DI N CD. - NJ 0 .Di n o o ..., - co o 0 o 3-, z rt- x u, o rt, c-.). rt .4:,.. •--...H - 0 - 141 NJ Z t...) • 0 C 0 GI H 0 • VI • - 0 0 O k 0 1,1 t• a . 0 0 • Z 0 H1 C.) HI 0 I-. -10 u) 0 H ul o t-f, • - I-. • -..., o U) H H . 0 - H ...__ c) t-, ....i - .r.. Di o U) m m 0 H Z H tcl 0 M 0 trl V) VI ri• 0 0 0 0 C) NJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n o r) o o a H0 Z I I I I I in ..- C I t I I I I I I I I t I I --1 H H H H H 1-1 0 X C LO 141 (41 M ,ir, u1 U) (Ti ln U) Ln IA tO H 0 U) n 7. ' ■-?. 7.: .. , ' . . . .... .._._. . . ... , ._ . .. . , . . . . . , . . - ..,'..:..:',1.... . ... . - . ",. :--.--',.4..-,-:.',.. •, . , „ ..-, . 9 I: 3'et 6 C in U. in LA 1.71 I.rI cr, ..v. .e. A A A A A A A A t4 co co to r3 t..n A 1.4 to H 0 0 a) --4 CD Cn A La ro H 0 c0 CO --I a) • z 0 -• O r C)) Efl 1-3 Cn 4 rcl 0 t-, 4 CO CD I IV C) to O I-. n7 n rt CD x p 1-.• la? m 1-- H. to 1-ri 7 t, ',i 0 0 Q, 0 I-t II H 0 11 X CD H '< 11 0 CD 0 H 0 NI • 0 a H '1 '< <C 4 0 13 I-I 0 c'CI — 4 CF II rt 0 4 H OD 2. h H En CD 4 I-., I.-. In 0 I-,, 0 ED 0 tri H. N ci G N pc • E-ti in z.: - C) 0 H n - co a 4 CPU .ci .4 - cn n n N in U) H n = 0 in 13 H Z 4 It 0 Ln 0 ED rt a o rr - o En in ft- tri- m cn En a 0 co t-a i-t in cn pc, .-to in to in a 0. Di co 0 rt. rt a ii rt 1- 1... H' rt iD U) ID H. CD rt hi rt CI C 11 4 Pc G CD 0 1-'• I-1 0 C 0 (C) tD ID rt tIl P•I ICI .••• I-•• 1-I 21, .4 rr t+ H CI 0 0 V) 11 rt 11 0c rt H G 0 I-I 0 1-.. !.., CCD 1-.• 1-.• 0 0 1-c• .4 H in 4 Cl) H co rt. rr,'4 Cr) 0 H O Cr) 0 0 4 0 1-1- 0 1.-- a a .4 HI rt H 7 7- 7 7 0 ''t '' 7 v.: n H XI 1-.• 0 0 ..... O 0 • P• 2 CD n z cn n o 1-1 a 'Ti (C) I-. H in 0 1 X' 10 C) • CD 0 in 2 H N. • 1-- fr I-."' ". 0 CD 0 CD I-1 H • 0 11 (Ti V H V O 0 .. .,•••, li • 0 O tn. n z.• co 11 .4 A A A A A A A A A A A CO to Co Co Co Li to co 1...) ID 1-3 oi col ln U' ca Co Lo 0 0 0 0 t.O ID -4 -.1 .3 -.3 -.1 CFI al (1 I I t t I I I I I I I I I P4 1 I 1 I 1 I I tr.1 0 Ocl 7 7 7 7 7 7 P > 0 0 1 i i I I I i i ( 1 I I 1 A H CO -3 1J3 Li to H LA) 3-. 1.11 H cf) H H CrI to to -4 -3 -.I to 0 H 7 7 "'H tO 1...1 ... at > - 0. - 0 V 0 ✓ 10 m tO in P., H LI t-i ri r H m r t..• m ca H H v S 8 rE) • • A CD ID CD • 0 cl) • in A .A. 0 0 • 0 En rn cn Cl) 0 U. in in •Lit (ii Dl w ((I t-a -3 0 a) to n m .....7 f) til LI (11 VI CD In 0 0 C) in .^, 1.1 Cl)) 1-1 1-1 Pi 0 Pi t.1 Ft ''.. I'D 0 0 CD 0 CD rt 11. rt rt CD 0 rt rt 0 Cl CD CD— rt.. V CI 0 In Cl co 2 2 V ,.... ti 0' 0' 11 11 2 11) II il ti 0 10 10 10 Di Ell 0 E0 ID ID 0 G CD CD (D 11 7777 in 7 7 in LI) G in CL) in o H 0 H H H H H H H Di cu 0 P./ 0 RI RI 0 O 0 0 CD 0 f) n n "C ts h ti ti 11 11 11 CD 0 CD CD CD fD ED CD co >i m H "§ 5 5- 5 5 5 2 — 5 5 5 5 5 P i'Ll 0- 0 ....., ,,, O 0 H c) 11, 00000000 '6 o o o o o V RI H - - 0 HHHHHHH HY.' H 1-• 1-' 1-. 1-. n r) to 0 1-1 co ID 0 ID rt) 11) CD fD CD 0 ID CD CC) M 1-, X 114 X co 0 0 81 t--. H H tO g 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 S' 5 5 S' 6' ,) fD ft -.I 0 -...I 0 rt rt rt rt rt rt rt Cl' El* ct rt Cl' rt rt tn 8 Ill rt LID 0 - - H" rl •-.iLl CD X .. to 2 En co Cl' m o 0 tt•I-I o 0 b I-4 - , 1-3 cr, Pi H H P4 co it CI) m t=1 El ."..A VD U1 V/ 2 2 H 2 2 r•I CD) H 2 2 tc) CD) n r) co 0 cn 1 o C') n o n c-) 0 ('I n ri C) H 0 , --. 1 i 1 ■ , , , I I I I I I I I I co 1 I I I I 1 .-a ■---1 '''• n- H H H to z 6 tri u, cc, in I— in tit t.ti m c...) to 1.0 h.) to in tit i Pi ._, •-.. H. L- T LO ID ..... ,.., . — - . . . - - .. . _ • , . • . , ' ^ . ' :'' . :'. ' . . , _ ", -..'' - '. . '.' '-•::.:'..''''. ..'• ' • 59C; '.....7'- k.)•..., Cl Cl VI I.Ji EA 1H 0 to Cl -...) Li' ® Cl z 0 ) . t-t ti to ■=t to n ra n z. at 0 a 1,- go o v I-I 4,tt t ct n x i--' 0 0 ri- ..-- O P -.. 5 5 li 0 0 r: ID rt a- I al z • ro m ED 0 H 0 LE, 0 Ii H H - 1-, ,-3 o n t-4 Cl 0 rt 41/ 01 C) H PH n cr, CD C 0 En Z rt ED (01-I- En tr 0 0. ro I-- • 0 0 0 OH 0 0 P., g 2' En I-,• .S.* n- n 0 O ig ED rE3 rr P 0 0, :n ,P. •,5 H 4„ CO 4. W I X 7 I I I H f.„) H Ir, © 0 -4 y •-.I 0.-t ■-a ,77 H crt NI to • 1-, ...1 W 1.1 in 03 01 En 'El. ED (-I ) P P p 0 N • 0 r4 0 ID 0 0 in En ,4 I-• Z ,t 1 N I 1'4 ',1. Z H -4 H H H 11 0 0 H Lri O po0000 HP 00 ) P 0 N O 0 HOS r ^ 5 i•-•• 0 . r-t, 0 o n 0 Et 11 0 II 11 coMryxXE 00 Z :r., 01 0" I-• 0 0 O I 1-c 1•4 to t'i NI fe. 0 tO h.: Es3 0 ti 0 0 10 0 HI H 0 0 0 I-' 0 0 0 0 , wiz, - _ ,-..,... O to • 0 ...,H ED 11 X it • .. 11 • rr 11 .0 O 0 El. I,-.) ..4 IQ 0 0 It NI •,,I, K En 1,-. 0 0 0 I-. 1-• 0 H Z O . I-'• . 0 ''. tri f r m -c• 0 0 VI ti Vi --- y ® n 0 - I I I I ED ll H . LA En ln ® V . H ) C In ID ....„, . „ .. . , . „ • . . . . . . . , . ���'^� '}' °= *�}'|— ORANGE oomrY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agenda ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ztemmo'5-1 MEETING DATE September 27, 1082 Subject: Title II-B Program | puuz�� oe=zing; yes �L no.I 1 re��t=�`�� CETA • . ._ -- �` Attachment(s): Letter of vommitment- Information Contact: of funds from The Division of Employ- Ernest Mangum, Kenneth H. Thompson, ment & Training to operate a Title CETA Director & County Manager I[-8 Program; Budget Amendment Phone NoMasr: ext. 468 ext. 501 PURPOSE: Consider acceptance of the Title II-U Grant for FY '83, upon Congressional approval of enabling legislation and DET contract approval. NEED: Needs assessment was conducted by Mr. David Mack, Regional Planner of the Division of Employment & Training, Raleigh, North Carolina. Copies of the complete assessment are available upon request' Congress has not passed the enabling legislation that would be effective October l 1982' In order for the County to continue CETA after September 30, without Congressional approval, a budget uined ^^ before any could occur. This amendment would have to show the e source as County revenue pending an approved contract with DET. The '~`~ funds required not be determined at the present time. amount of County un s requ re can w. — 3ee attached letter of Susan Train. Ms. Train indicates as of 9-22-82 that she is 90% sure_ of funding at federal level. Both houses have passed bill with differences that are being worked out in committee. IMPACT: Involvement of over 100 persons, 14 years of age and above in educational and work experience training. Target groups are economically disadvantaged, handicapped, high school dropouts, AFDC recipients and minorities. This program will augment the county work force by the above mentioned figure. Funding is as follows: 4 a. Program funds - 5161 ,236 b. Administration funds - 27,467 Total Funds - 5188,703 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approval of attached amendment but conditioned on the County advancing the Federal funds ohe month at a time. ' -,-- •.,--`'-,,',-,.'7'.-...- - .I-: ,,-,_ , . . -,.: ,1- ':''' '■::.-' . 7.. - ,.-; ; 's:,',.'-`,.-'! -—4;!L.:!4.7r7a. ,"1- r,' ' ,..':','..7:-.;:;:.-- - ''-.,,. ::: '.: --' :,,':..1.,--:Z.' ::: ':,!.' ::.'^:.:1:,, :: ;!'::: ',-,::'.:":,..;.Y..:;;;:-....-;:-.:';71;t1Oftti&F.:.:Ff,.:; 7•4-7,,:: '7414.;;11; 44 > ' ', • ' - : .-- ..:'' ,:^':,f,...Y;,:,j:: :!',L_.. .-.'''.:1,'::&t.-1.:::, . , ':,-DIVISION OF 44e', . .„. EMPLOYMENT," :' .'' 7..,.a. North Carolina DApartment of Natural . AND TRAINING —. ,r,:,..•47 t Resources &Community Development;-•.,.!.,;,k:... N Wayne Paves Director James B.Hunt.Jr,Governor Joseoh W Grirnsley,Secretary Telephone 919 7315310 September 22, 1982 Mr. Richard Whitted, Chairman Orange County Commissioners Courier Box 291 Hillsborough, NC ,-... . - . .--, Dear Mr. Whitted: • , , =,,i,•':. The,Division of Employment and Training is currently in the process of negotiating contracts with Orange County to operate the CETA TI-B/C program during fiscal year 1983. These contracts will cover adminigtrative costs and program costs (excluding participant allowances) for the following activities: CATEGORY ESTIMATED AMOUNTS Administration $27,467 Individual Referral 22,067 Basic Education 4,709 Orientation & Motivation 4,119 On-the-Job Training 25,118 Adult Work Experience 60,324 Youth Work Experience 51,670 The effective date of these contracts will be October 1, pend- _ ing Congressional approval of enabling legislation and receipt of program authorization from the 1LS, Department of Labor. This letter should serve as notice of DET's intent to contract with Orange County. Should there be any questions about the status of these negotiations, please contact me. Sincerely, . . „AtAxa,4,.....--.4).-A.J.-............- _ Susan Train Region 3 Planner ST/jmck cc: Ken Thompson P 0 Box 27687 Ra!eigh.N,C 27611-7587 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • . ., . • . . . , ` ='= . ^ ` . 7, 7 - - |� - . , , . `' ORANGE-COUNTY '� ' . COMPREHENSIVE EMPLOYMENT _MEMT X�D TRAINING ACT � � � . _ ' - PROJECT ORDINANCE ' ^ _ -`^ _ ' 1982-83 ' . - , WHEREAS sufficient funds will be available to Orange County from the State of North Carolina to provide a balanced budget wherein rvices available for the h e project are equal to appropriations. Orange County will advance funds one month j ' ' at a time to operate the program pending receipt o f �ade�al grant. _ . � NOW THEREFORE The ~— of '- ss1oners of Orange County, North Carolina 7 ' in regular sessbn" = ""=ass do ordain, that the following sums be appropriated: �' ` .. — � - — — � �r�� �� Appropriation: Ceta IDQ - Administration $ 27,467. ' ^ -271 I & R Service Staff 11,271. :., I & R Participants 4,025. A8E Service Staff 4,020. _ ABE Participants w . HRD Service Staff 3i516. ~ 3 HRD Participants 603. OJT Service Staff 6;398. ' OJT Participants 18,720. ANE Service Staff 13"217, AWE Participants 47,107. • YW£ Service Staff 8,375. YNE Participants 43,295. Source: - CETA-418 Federal Grant $I88"703. A4... T,.. � -, This Ordinance shall be entered into the minutes of the Board of Commissidners of Orange County and copies of the Ordinanoe will be filed with the Finance Officer, the Budget Officer, and the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners within five days of its adoption. _ __ _ _ _ _ , . __-_ ' _ - ' '-_-_-___- -___ -__-___-�- • . _ _ ' . . -_ - � _ ' ._ — _-____- _~__- ��� __- ~�. � 1'� Onznvo c]Ug7Y BOARD OF cmustioN5L5 sctiozTv3enda itcm No' E-2 ACTION I'M.] ABSTRACT xu��ua msE-TM nxTE__52p 'v"' ^: 3objact: Housing Rehab Awards ' --- l Public Hearing: yes x no nity Development �� Information contact: Wilbert McAdoo Bid Results Phone Ntraber: Ext. 429 • • • °. . Purpose; Award of five Housing Rehabilitation Contracts. • - - �- Need: Sealed bids were received and andopened o 17, 1982' Attached is avtabolation of the bids by dwelling unit numbers. Only in the case of the Lawndale Avenue property is the lowest bidder not recommended. Low bid was 18.61% under the estimate of the Housing Rehabilitation Specialist. Community Development policy states that bids of 16% above or below the estimate not be awarded as those above ' could entail two much profit and those which are significantly below could be unrealistic. The policy is in accord with State law which provides "the award shall be made to the lowest responsible bidder. , ' taking into consideration quality, performance and the time specified in the proposals for the performance of the contract." Bid of..GatesConstructiom is mcummended, It,was second lowest and near to the prior estimate. \ ' Impact: Award of contract to the lowest bidder will be consistent with present housing rehabilitation bid 'procedure. Recommendation(s): DU # Street Contractor Bid Amount 14 Lawndale Avenue Gates Cohstruction 9,377.00 54 Revere Road Gates Construction 7,537'00 88 Daye Street Gates Construction 10,716'00 100 Faucette Mill Road Taylor Home Improvement 6,355.00 146 Harper Street Temco Construction 6,355.00 PMn - - _' _ _ _ _ �__' . '--' ' ___--___--_- .-_' JhLj 6 - / �'� � ~ ���� '� , - � ~ 'l ~ ` ~ � ^° � - RESULTS OF BID OPENING ' APPLICATION NVHUERl4 ]�n[R� Eva Whitted --- COST ESTIMATE: g./OO.OU _ :DOxE53: Lawndale Avenue ESTIMATE:------- COST ESTIMATE PERCENTAGE OF BID OYE l O9 UNDER__________--- CHECK ONE: JOB 8|O l_ij JOB NEGOTIATED \ 1 '' BID AMOUNT COMPANY 9,377.00 i ' I . 2' Frank Griffin 10'765.00 J. Morrow Cunstroctio^ . . 12,500.00 ,� ^= w a, ncuurnc Construction • — ------ S. Taylor Home lm,rovement ` ^ ' `o II O!« �pened by: 7.. Robert H'l "o _ _ — .�/ `� of Bid o id 0 uning'p ' — -- ¢ 'of Did Opening: 3e"temher 17 ~: Vieoed by: Albert Morrow ____ ~�+�++��^�~°°^°°�°°°°°�°+°°°w°++°°°~°°°°°w°°+°°.°°°°°*°°°°~*~~~..---'' *°° • ___' LoweotAeceptable Bid: 9,377.00 negot��ted Amouint: _ . Contractor: Gates •,;. .. . NAME ' Rt. 1 Box 8 Snow Cam, N.C. 27349 ADDRESS ''~^` UMBER' — . COMMENTS: Mcduffie e Construction's bid was 18.61% under the estimate. Community Development policy states that bids of 16% above or below the estimate ' will not be awarded. Gates Construction was the second lowest bidder. ` . c-�, 9 ��� -JF2- »�/ �� /�� ' -- Submitted by: / � ^ '''^ Bid Approved by: ----- Not Issued T Proceed Order: Issued EL) ---1 COMMENTS: _ _ ^ . - e0:T: 10-1 6 102 .2 � ^J ' RESULTS OF BID OPENING OWNER: 8nb APPLICATION NUMBER 54 -----� COST ESTIMATE: 7,137.00 ADDRESS: Revere nua" 5'31 UNDER, COST ESTIMATE ERCENTAGE OF BID OVER - _HECK ONE; JOB BID JOB NEGOTIATED [— -1 D � x I / / COMPANY BID AMOUNT Gates Construction 7,537.00 /, Frank Griffin & Associates ' 10,275.00 3' T mco Construction 8,174.00 4. Mcduffie Construction 8.D5O,nV 5 7 845 On Taylor Home Improvement � ` 6. Morrow Construction , - Bids opened by: Robert Wilson Time of Bid Opening: 3:00 P.M. Date of Bid Opening: September 17, 1082 Witnessed by: Albert Morrow ^~°~°°°+°^°++°°°°°°°*°+ *°°^~°°°°*^^°°°~~~°°°*^°°*~~__°~°+^°°°^+~°°°+°°°°*^**^°°° Lowest Acceptable Bid:, 7,537.00 xegodated Amount: N/A ' _ _ Contractor: Gates_— NAME Rt. 1 Box 8, Snow Camp N.C, 27349 ADDRESS 376-6597 PHONE NUMBER COMMENTS: Community Developments contribution towards the rehabilitation of this dwelling unit will be $6,000.00. � ,�m DATE: ' - -Jr2_ Submitted by: Bid Approved by: ' Not Issued j } Proceed Order: Issued l I EOM j u f 6 - 102 .6 RESULTS OF BID OPENING p;.NER: Ransom Whitted APPLICATION NUMBER 88 ADDRESS: Daye Street COST ESTIMATE: 10,603.00 COST ESTIMATE PERCENTAGE OF BID OVER 1 .06 UNDER CHECK ONE: JOB BID I X 1 JOB NEGOTIATED 1 1 COMPANY BID AMOUNT Gates Construction 1O.71A-11D 2 Frank Griffin & Associates 11,8lD,DD - 3. Temco Construction, 17.135 nn Mcduffie Construction 12,190 OD, 5 Taylor HnmP imprn,iFment 11 ,220,00 6, Morrow Construction 12,000.00 Bids opened by: Robert Wilson —' Time of Bid Opening: 3:00 P.M. Date of Bid Opening: September 17, 1982 Witnessed by: Albert Morrow ***********************'****i****.*******tiro**************************'*********** Lowest Acceptable Bid: 10,716.00 Negotiated Amount: N/A Contractor: Gates Construction NAME Rt. 1 Box 8 Snow Camp, N.C. , ADDRESS 376-6597 PHONE NUMBER COMMENTS: Submitted by: k'1,2L4-}- c � d PATE Bid Approved by: Proceed Order: Issued Not Issued COMMENTS: ^ ` / U�/ — ( u � w��'� � | ' �Vq u / RESULTS OF BID OPENING APPLICATION NUMBER 100 Vernell Jordan OxxE�� ' 6,154..00 C0�T ESTIMATE: Faucette Mill Road ' ADDRESS: . � � ` 0ST ESTIMATE .PERCENTAGE OF BID OVER 1 .62 UNDER _-_-^ f BID i- L ' JOB NEGOTIATED 1 ! E�K ONE: JOB B � _J ' BID AMOUNT COMPANY \ , Gates Construction ' � 6.560.00 Frank Griffin & Associates - 7,805.00 Z, -' Temcu Const�uctjon --6`600.00 --- Mcduffie Construction 7,045.00 • 5 Taylor Home Improvement - 6,255.80 6. Morrow Construction 7,695.00 Bids opened by: Robert Wilsnn Time of Bid Opening: 3:00 P.N. Date of Bid Opening: September 17. l982 A Witnessed by: Albert Morrow *~+°°+°+°°°°°*°°°+°~^**°°°°~~°°°°°*^°+°°°°~°°°°^*+°°~°”°°~^°°~~°°°^°°°°^°°°°°°^° . Lowest Acceptable Bid: 6^255.08 negotiated AmoUnt: N/A Contractor: Taylor Home Imo . ` '^ NAME 1156 Fiske Street Durham, w.r • ADDRESS 688-3214 • PHONE NUMBER COMMENTS: ^�r�y DATE: 2-6 -F2-- Submitted by: �l/ ~"~x�/~�`�,�' ' , , __ _ Bid Approved by: Not |oveo F—� Proceed Order: Issued r---1 �___� COMMENTS: ...._- ' -- - --- -- -'_ -_---_- '-__--_- � �o � � � � h.� � ~ �� � v^� " ` = � '� ' m ' RESULTS OF D0 OPENING OWNER: Fannie Youman APPLICATION NUMBER 145 COST ESTIMATE: 6,088.00 ADDRESS: Harper Street - ' PERCENTAGE OF BID OVER 4.21 UNDER COST^ ESTIMATE ' CHECK ONE: JOB BID JOB NEGOTIATED | BID AMOUNT COMPANY Gates Construction 7,200.00 ' _. Frank Griffin & Associates _ 7,77�,7,775,0Q_ ----' 3. Temco Construction 6 355 It 4 Mcduffie Construction . 7,715.00' ~ - . . ' � �, • 5. Taylor UoMp � 6.703.00�rovpoen± � - 6. Morrow Construction 7^000.00 Bids opened by: Robert Wilson Time of Bid Opening: 3'00 P.M. Date of Bid Opening: tembe �7 1982 Witnessed by: ``�� A] rt Morrow °+++°+++°^°°^w°°°+°°*~^°°~°°°°*~°°°~°°°°°°°°°°^^°+°°°*^°+°^+"*°^°**~+°~°°°*°°^°° iuwest Acceptable Bid: 6,355.00 Negotiated unt: N/A Temco Construction . Contractor: NAME P.O. Box 266 Durham, N.C. ' ADDRESS 383-5384 PHONE NUMBER COMMENTS: z DATE: �- �� -5'2_- Submitted by: u«� ' �v~�-^� ' ' ' Bid Approved by: Not lsmno �__\ Proceed Order: Issued Ii /_ , COMMENTS: