HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 05-25-1989 APPROVED: 6-28-89 MINUTES
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
PUBLIC HEARING
MAY 25, 1989
The Orange County Board of Commissioners met on May 25, 1989 at 7:30 p.m. in
Superior Courtroom, Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina for the
purpose of hearing citizen comments on matters concerning economic development in the
County.
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT,: Chair Moses Carey, Jr. , and Commissioners Shirley E. Marshall,
Stephen Halkiotis, Don Willhoit, John Hartwell.
ATTORNEY PRESENT: Geoffrey Gledhill
STAFF PRESENT: County Manager John Link, Purchasing Director Pam Jones, Economic
Development Director Sylvia Price, Planner Gene Bell, Clerk to the Board Beverly
Blythe and Deputy Clerk to the Board Kathy Baker.
CONSULTANT PRESENT: Thomas McDowell of McDevco Associates, Raleigh, NC.
Chairman Carey opened the meeting at 7:30 p.m. He indicated that this meeting
was the second of two Public Hearings which were originally scheduled to hear public
comment on the remaining site for the proposed Regional Airport. On Monday night, May
22nd, the Board of Commissioners decided that site 11 was not suitable and that other
alternatives could be pursued to contribute to the achievement of the County's goal of
economic development and diversification of the tax base. The Board also voted on
Monday night to continue with these Public Hearings to hear citizen comment on the
subject of alternative methods for reaching those goals mentioned above. Members of
the public who wish to comment on the need for an airport in Orange County are invited
to speak on that also.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPEN FOR CITIZEN COMMENTS.
MR. JAMES LA TORRE, an Orange County resident, presented the Board of
Commissioners with additional petitions opposing the proposed airport. He stated that
he has recently learned that over 90% of the tax base is residential and that tax
base needs to be expanded by attracting industry to our County. He suggested setting
aside an area for industrialization and providing an adequate infrastructure in that
area. He also suggested using the communication network that has been established to
fight the airport• as.a tool for organizing the current labor force, so that potential
employers will know the kind of workforce available to them. Finally, he suggested
the County's attendance at trade shows where industries are seeking new locations for
their business.
MS. LEIGH PEEK, an Orange County resident, spoke in opposition to Orange County
ever having a regional airport. She suggested that a commitment be made to have the
County stay the way the people in the County want it to be, rather than doing whatever
to attract economic development. She also asked that in the future Orange County
residents be used as consultants. She suggested that the County learn to better
budget county funds so that the goal of economic development could be reached without
having to raise taxes. She mentioned that the utilities, particularly the telephone
systems, need to be improved in order to attract new industry. She stated that her
understanding is that the area in the County which is zoned Industrial/Commercial does
not have water/sewer service. A commitment needs to be made to actually making the
land available to industry by providing the necessary utilities. Finally, she
suggested that job training is needed in Orange County.
MR. JOHN HUNTER, an Orange County resident, stated that he was disappointed that
the Commissioners voted against Site 11 on Monday evening before the scheduled Public
Hearings. He suggested that the Commissioners have given the appearance of
short-circuiting the democratic process under the pressure of a loud special interest
group. He told the Commissioners that he and other citizens had been waiting to
express their feelings publicly only to have the forum made meaningless in terms of
airport pros and cons. He stated that he was unaware of any statistics which
suggested that it is unsafe to live near an airport; that small, general aviation
airports are good neighbors to have; they yield no significant pollution; this type of
airport is rural in character; many communities see general aviation airports as
assets to the community; finally, he stated that he was saddened and angered that the
opposition has been one of emotional incitement based on inaccurate and misleading
statements.
MR. DAVID NAQUIN spoke in opposition to Orange County having a regional airport.
He stated that he believes the Commissioners were ill-served by the Consultants who
provided the airport study. He mentioned that the Consultants took wind and weather
data from 1948-1964 and based the Orange County airport report on that data. He noted
that those years were peculiar times in national weather patterns. It was
exceptionally good, stable weather. That all deteriorated after the mid-60's. The
data that comes out of that study is not appropriate for today. Also, he stated that
there is an "ice line" which comes across from the southwest point of the County at
Dodson's Crossroad and then across '86 toward Hillsborough. There was no reference in
the study to this type of micro-climate data which would have an impact on the
usability of an airport during the winter. He suggested the Commissioners pay closer
attention to who is chosen as a consultant and the type of reports they return. He
would like to contribute to the process through participation on the Economic
Development Commission. He stated that Orange County is competing with Wake, Durham,
and Alamance for clean industry and will need to develop the benefits of doing
business with Orange County and sell those to the appropriate industries.
MR. CARL WALTERS, a member of the Rural Character Study Committee, stated that
the Committee is nowhere near having a policy for each community in Orange County.
Many citizens are distrustful of the entire process. He stated that his personal
concern is that the rural citizens are not being convinced that their wishes will be
given top priority in developing a plan for how they want their area of the County to
look. He suggested the Commissioners make their personal commitment to the plan known
to the citizens. He stated that he had a plan with him that had been adopted by a
committee that worked through the Institute of Government, Research Triangle
Institute, Triangle J Council of Governments, different attorneys, and many others.
This plan would have created legal districts. He stated that if this plan had been
adopted by the county it would have offered to the rural people a legal document to
protect them, and avoid this current sense of distrust. This plan would have assured
the residents that a Public Hearing, for the people who would be effected, would be
held before any action had been taken.
MR. PATRICK DAVIS, a member of the Economic Development Commission, stated that
the Economic Development Strategic Plan was recently adopted by the County
Commissioners. That plan includes many strategies to address the economic development
needs of all geographic areas of the County. Support of a general aviation airport is
one of the strategies related to the provision of infra-structure within the County.
i•
Local airports, in other communities, have been regarded by those communities as
significant assets in recruiting new business and maintaining existing ones. The
Economic Development Commission believes that this type of airport in the County could
be an important asset to assist in the County's economic development efforts.
However, they accept the decision made by the Board of Commissioners not to pursue an
airport and are moving ahead to implement the Strategic Plan. Citizen support and
involvement is going to be needed to achieve the goals of that plan. He stated that•
there are five major committees of the Economic Development Commission and asked for
volunteers to participate on those committees. He indicated that his interest in
participating on the Commission stemmed from knowledge of historical tax rates in the
County. Since 1977 the combined tax bill for his property, including county, city and
school taxes, has increased by over 100%. County taxes alone have gone up over 160%
during that 11 year period. There is a need to look strongly at diversifying the tax
base in the county and that means pursuing a different economic development strategy.
MS. HELEN NOWAK, a retired farmer, stated that it sounds like the County is
attempting to make Orange County industrial. She asked where are we saving
agricultural land? At one time, the largest export items were agricultural items,
such as grain, lumber, meat. Too much agricultural land is being put into industry,
and shopping malls. The little landowners are paying such a large amount of taxes to
support schools.
MR. ROBERT KELLER stated that he is a pilot and does not feel that airports are
safe, nor does he believe that the County needs, another airport. He stated that he
believes that there are sufficient airports in the area. Roxboro airport has only 25
airplanes stationed there. Burlington has an airport as well, and there is going to
be a new airport just south of Chapel Hill at Holly Springs. He also mentioned the
poor quality of the telephone system. He stated that this is a real hindrance to
business and needs to be corrected as soon as possible. Another drawback is that
there is not the right kind of technical training for workers in the county. He
agreed with an earlier speaker who brought up the fact that there is a need to offer
protection to the farmers even to the extent of zoning land so that it will only be
available for farm land.
COMMISSIONER MARSHALL stated that two years ago Orange County initiated some
investigations into the telephone system. They got the Triangle J Council of
Governments involved, and then got the Utilities Commission to hold a public hearing.
One of the things that came out of that hearing from the Utilities Commission was that
all the telephone companies were requested to bring in figures about how much it would
cost to have free Triangle services. Those figures arrived in January of this year.
Public staff is now looking at the figures. They are somewhat enthusiastic because
the figures did not look as discouraging as they thought they would. There is a good
possibility that they will be able to recommend toll free calling. When the public
staff makes their recommendation there will be a need for letters from citizens
supporting that proposal. A lot of pressure needs to be exerted during the hearings
at the Utilities Commission. The County will have to count on the citizens.
MS. SALLY KELLER stated that she has been attending the Rural Character Study
meetings and finds them very interesting. Her only question at this time is where
will there be Industrial Parks? She stated that in her opinion Lane Kendig did not
have a satisfactory answer to this question. Also, the knowledge received from the
Rural Character Study and the Economic Development Commission needs to be coordinated.
She also agreed with the previous speaker about the need for zoning.
S.
r•
CHAIRMAN CAREY stated that it is the responsibility of the Commissioners and
County staff to ensure that the multiple projects, specifically the Economic
Development and the Rural Character Study, do merge with each other and that their
goals do not conflict.
MR. RON =MIN, a member of SCRAP, presented the Board of Commissioners with
several petitions in opposition to the regional airport. He also stated that SCRAP
and its process for "factfinding", were professional and in his opinion correct in
their results. They organized committees, and consulted with the EPA, FAA, Raleigh-
Durham Airport, NCDOT-Aviation Division and the Gulf-Stream Aircraft Co. All of the
facts which they used were either direct quotes from the County's consultants' report
or were references to quotes which were given to SCRAP from the agencies mentioned.
He also mentioned the fact that the citizens did not abandon the fight after their own
particular sites were eliminated. He challenged members of SCRAP to remain active in
the county process now that the airport issue is dead. Orange County citizens need to
be involved to protect this county. He thanked all of the people in the county for
getting behind this effort. He also thanked the Commissioners for helping to educate
citizens, himself included, during this process.
RANDALL POYTHRESS stated that the OMNI organization that is forming is a very
good idea. There are so many people who do not stay abreast of what is happening that
every means possible needs to be used to keep them informed. He stated that the
purpose of the OMNI organization is to promote, maintain and enhance the quality,
stability and vitality of the residential neighborhoods of Orange County. To
accomplish its purpose the OMNI network will research and take positions on issues
affecting any member neighborhood and will collect and disseminate information to
stimulate awareness and interest in those issues. Examples of such neighborhoods
would be The Trails, Wildwood, The Neighborhood Alliance, Small Voices, and Cedar
Grove. The network will work in a positive and cooperative way with Government
officials and other public and private organizations to accomplish its goals. A
neighborhood will be defined as an ongoing, private, formal and representative
organization in a defined geographic area, composed of at least 40 households and
accounting for at least 15% of the households in the area, the purpose of which is not
inconsistent with that of the network. There will be one voting representative
elected, or appointed, by the governing body of each neighborhood, as well as one
alternate representative per neighborhood. These representatives will conduct all
business of the network. Other persons from the neighborhoods are encouraged to serve
on committees of the networks. Charter member neighborhoods will establish the by-
laws of the organization. She stated there is a need to work together in this county.
MR. WILLIAM HUTCHINS stated that for 30 years he lived four miles from a major
reliever airport and it was not a bad place to live. The sound was not a problem and
there were no accidents in the 30 years that he lived there. He indicated that he
believed that the Rural Character Study was a case of the cart before the horse. The
85 - 40 Highway is going to be the major feature that, in the future, is going to make
the difference. Two major interstate roads go through Orange County and he feels a
major city will eventually develop where they intersect. There is a need to have a
Metropolitan Plan for that future city and from that point a need to have the Rural
Character Study. He believes there needs to be an airport every 20 miles from large
cities so that high-tech industries will locate in that area. He suggested figuring
out where we need an airport (if we do need one) and using that land for a landfill.
Residents could be given notice that in the future that land would be used for an
airport. This land could be zoned for business and industry.
. t
JEFF, a resident of Calvander, stated that he was appalled at the change in
procedure used on Monday night when an additional meeting was scheduled before the
regular Commissioners meeting. The usual process was circumvented and he hopes that
it will not happen again.
There being no further comments, the Public Hearing was closed at 8:45 p.m.
Moses Carey, Jr. , Chair
Kathy Baker, Deputy Clerk
--- -
., . .
To: Orange County Commissioners
Moses Carey, Don Wilihoit , Stephen Halkiotis
Shirley Marshall and John Hartwell
As residents of Orange County and land owners either on or
very close to potential airport sites #8 and #11 , we would like
to emphatically express our unanimous views about positioning
the airport right in the midst of our residential and
agricultural land.
We all invested not only our time and money, but our
lifestyles into the area because of the quality of the land and
environment, its location and its zoning of
Agricultural-Residential .
The land is zoned Agricultural-Residential , is being used
by the people as Agricultural-Residential and should remain
zoned as Agricultural-Residential .
In the name of progress, this airport will pollute our
wetlands , the air, the natural environment , create excessive
noise levels and destroy the value of our agricultural and
residential land.
We feel it is totally unjust for the Commissioners to
exercise their power of Eminent Domain to force us away from our
land for merely speculative reasons for the need of the airport.
We unitedly agree not to sell our land for the use of the
airport , and feel it will be financially unpractical for the
county to pay for the destruction the airport will cause to the
quality of our land, improvements and lifestyles.
NAME ,
, ADDRESS 1 TAX#
t
i fi I
1 .
. .
.1 . - .
6 1\-) t / I .,:`)-z:,, /0 7 E ii.L..,.44 4._ 4-A-f-,/y--
IA i '
"4-- te.,I i • 11.--,LI-7c- k. lia , get_/6 7 kr ei L.,,....1 ive: ; Li--Y-; / (1--
,
p -1,-0
Li /6-7 ,"(X„,.(... - . : LIPAW)6
u •
/7) •
-- ,./.....a- t--"-r-ep.) &.17...e......, fl // a d)//e)7 C.- 54.7a4--yl.,`,/ e ; $-eg •4'
• i .
, .
- r. 14:14-alle,) Al
a- cant-II:5 : fo,d•4 6 /S: bizeic; Lei Ler110
LH)i 10
,
la_ 1 B CA it t --(r. Ca taltd Ni C. 40-tatt I
, , , ,
(ou.1.11 c:).tc. ‘1, ! g-4 i, 1■ e
1 1, ,
's c r.(,„i..., 0,1 ..,A „Lif r d. AZ., / C.O. 9Y" t /...., t , t ,tii t7A)
14,, keef (/// 4014,11' SI4‘
7774- / .67:fr
11-1,'Aaj (mac { ,..� t-PCl/1„f -972.-,(V-
a.. I att, 10 7-A c • co
./
(2? /14/
/ E// Le)
/re "V 1- 3
. att'z., .
? / e-iii
Fizepy.), ,77 ,c_ 0 7 3-
tic.tu 5 7)
r
60-y- zit tff
. 1.4/ -2 (--1 id 5'6
7, 72cts
. 1v64-.,,/,-6, a
It Leg Ct
ZoX V/I) qiti67
item-e-ceZC, 7.2.cf
�' g4 y/4.) • • rse
k,,ya
dt-ø . 1);-� 1(.
IV! /,.
(//-t. • _ , TOM-
fi
. .
. .
• .
To: Orange County Commissioners
Moses Carey, Don Willhoit , Stephen Halkiotis
Shirley Marshall and John Hartwell
As residents of Orange County and land owners either on or
very close to potential airport sites #8 and #11 , we would like
to emphatically express olir unanimous views about positioning
the airport right in the midst of our residential and
agricultural land.
We all invested not only our time and money, but our
lifestyles into the area because of the quality of the land and
environment, its location and its zoning of
Agricultural-Residential .
The land is zoned Agricultural-Residential , is being used
by the people as Agricultural-Residential and should remain
zoned as Agricultural-Residential .
In the name of progress, this airport will pollute our
wetlands, the air, the natural environment, create excessive
noise levels and destroy the value of our agricultural and
residential land.
We feel it is totally unjust for the Commissioners to
exercise their power of Eminent Domain to force us away from our
land for merely speculative reasons for the need of the airport .
We unitedly agree not to sell our land for the use of the
airport , and feel it will be financially unpractical for the
county to pay for the destruction the airport will cause to the
quality of our land, improvements and lifestyles.
NAME '
I ADDRESS :, TAX#
/ , ,
.......„ , ,
- , At
4,,, .4.....(. . . ., - • 4 A S ..
• 1
. n
V -13,_,,,■:) 0.—C:,, _s i...A D :I(.A-1) 1 )4,.ib al R
k .
__Ert§-4.,! tki- I) i' ciNi_ I /0 IA tlaf13-4,:
1 )- ..71
, ...,4,, __,.., 1
1 .1.1 ‘' / I I• Z.1 A •. ;' . ; 't21 :
1 ; t
,
lee: 4.1 at, (tit 1 ' fil / e) ./.' I.
—a
iili • %)&e4/W 2f11 I.i‘
,
l 't (
iil 1 . I
• i
.) .
LI 1 I 1 • L'a I A.C-4.1 : Ore 1 1 T)(1/ /'LW
.
: •
.... „ .• , • 1 I -I / i' .,-' I ,.I p • , . . 1
P11147 aZL) I
• II f '
!Pi *A irtV• ; //- _ ,
. 1
,
. 1
I :
A .4.4. . ___. 10
I Ilk i A 0 6
1 ...Az...
1 t I
I ., I , . .,
1 ., /< ,.; i. . :• . e" If / . ,"■••'''. I '..‘ "5/ ( ,• -,,I, 4" i
1 I
4% .0 XALO il Vil fe .., to,3-4. 407.I., , ,I:
. # . .
. • . .. , , .
it h.o..., i,,4 * - I A • ' ., ' f iir—r,...* I• ,
1 i ■
eituueiti. .I. L.h Je+._ I AA-Al q 4 P Jinostri -ill!. .4-....
; --, ii, c„,...:4;:, ,,r xi. / - ' 4,:c • 7 3 7 -fly, —
MLA& 9#1l-414ft—' . ""/ IdefeA ,ne.,
` e _ i1- 2 „ g71- /-57),-,-)x- ref- y.,,e , '+-, 51A , 732 P
51r414
i / .. 1?4,-1 � l01 a, x C _
it 11 fr '1 V . C 1)-4*":5v lg-/'.1 I.:,;-*Pi.4/2Q. ow.;iv crc"t-e C,ctra..3.,,, ikil e
kvas, eitiatec.,_ 0004/let,r fit i ge624418e,, meo,
t 7..vakee, ,e44/1 4'040A g •d e.
ilL,ge-le, e ex4ict_ "915L-1 r ;79 1 eligbeitel litle
V� sex ,..r'. 44LJ ,e' , S
,ife --)estaiAtAtx) , IS,/ 1/0/0/..-4' /-, . ,i 4. c . 67044618o .
ie. I & /0/11. !' vi, C. o 0; 9iVt
� e( / 10 I q4,,,,,,,, /2 ,
72z4- -- 07 A aft/7/- 1.,0 g 2.-7 72 .. o.r
c4046 4-4"064- 064 /. 007.- 01* 40$431 &Pe. -"red 7 - vs"-
Ze cirgatatel '' 2-/2----
f'/ -Ye.-- . ,.�.� ,,, i 9,,, ' .0 ` ems.-„1;, ii c ,y s _.6 u d -z _.
vim.. � ghittt4e- 0#f/
I 9 •
Fes.- ��' _ e34, '4,,'
, (_-. ),,,1640- 4'7 . G l /- Pe, . . ,roc SY - z.s-//
Ver
‘-/64:4v--4 --nvet,, p 0 lel: ea.27... 5— • 60e--s-J :
0 'j '", ,Crile-4/4'&_ I) g 0 X /711 . Alielkj--
# .,i!:_„. * . . , g€144thi---. " / I( - .111 '
To: Orange County Commissioners
Moses Carey, Don Willhoit , Stephen Halkiotis
Shirley Marshall and John Hartwell
As residents of Orange County and land owners either on or
very close to potential airport sites #9 and #11 , we would like
to emphatically express our unanimous views about positioning
the airport right in the midst of our residential and
agricultural land.
We all invested not only our time and money , but our
lifestyles into the area because of the quality of the land and
environment , its location and its zoning of
Agricultural-Residential .
The land is zoned Agricultural-Residential , is being used
by the people as Agricultural-Residential and should remain
zoned as Agricultural-Residential .
In the name of progress, this airport will pollute our
wetlands , the air , the natural environment , create excessive
noise levels and destroy the value of our agricultural and
residential land.
We feel it is totally unjust for the Commissioners to
exercise their power of Eminent Domain to force us away from our
land for merely speculative reasons for the need of the airport .
We unitedly agree not to sell our land for the use of the
airport , and feel it will be financially unpractical for the
county to pay for the destruction the airport will cause to the
quality of our land, improvements and lifestyles .
NAME : ADDRESS '
, TAX#
I
11
/
- • ,
• hi._de._ ,.. 1'1
, Y,---
. --
...._
e Jr 6 41
1 // .1 '
/ )
0 / ,
,
—I
fi4,re#1" i • Are • : 7,7
-14 -e. e'
: epi, 10,A-
.
h
JF0-
...., / ,
L
77) -4/
://2,.,
- */ 0 e•-(- ( ,4-,c1- i /63'7A 4'77/..4,--(-a-o-A- -Ii, C ! (Jr', .C.0
,
..,„
/ f (f, 1_4_1 ( e 1,--IL._ i /0 A ilk.uts-e-i,_ 'it .
i ) .
/-1.1,17u ;iTlikt„,,, _,
; 'R;t Di Picti `71 '
) , ,
a t ■-II :
1 I IMIIIPICft. trii i
' FILPIMPAIIIN Its,si. Milittite€,Tootak. cruira: trot-6 Cx
-----
- .
t
To: Orange County Commissioners
Moses Carey; Don Willhoit , Stephen Halkiotis
Shirley Marshall* and John Hartwell
As residents of Orange County and land owners either on or
very close to potential airport sites #8 and #11 , we would like
to emphatically express our unanimous views about positioning
the airport right in the midst of our residential and
. .
agricultural land.
We all invested not only our time and money, but our
lifestyles into the area because of the quality of the land and
environment , its location and its zoning of
Agricultural-Residential'.
The land is zoned Agricultural-Residential , is being used
by the people as Agricultural-Residential and should remain
zoned as Agricultural-Residential .
In the name of progress, this airport will pollute our
wetlands, the air , the natural environment , create excessive
noise levels and destroy the value of our agricultural and
residential land.
We feel it is totally unjust for the Commissioners to
exercise their power of Eminent Domain to force us away from our
land for merely speculative reasons for the need of the airport .
We unitedly agree not to sell our land for the use of the
airport , and feel it will be financially unpractical for the
county to pay for the destruction the airport will cause to the
quality of our land, improvements and lifestyles.
NAME I ADDRESS '
, TAX#
,gigidkvex_ga-±t24a.or_il' te,a. Zoitkrovirt_ple.4t)t„ .--1-):.
.r• 4--, ,
II
ect41 icjak,L i" /<4 /3091 iciC))611A-4 75--
C---::
01,11,",741a :
i U ‘
, t..
'A.-1"-- -AP/Ali 1 Af- .„.... r 4/...-.( I
J5-70..__77
? "intkivagx.,
"... . .4 , . liatt.A.4..) ; ir• 2._ A.,..:,.... 02.439r_ pc.„1/41,4_.-6
, , t...... 7 •
, 41, .
INNik ..• -
JP..0 Load1111,.. ■ i, i '
' .1..;44_ 4
-- -
1 , 1
Lt"
,
. mg, 4, --or
. i 6 ,. • . _... . .4f ,Lt - .11:0'al?. Er--uvoD 4 ki- ‘,6
. .
To : Orange County Commissioners
Moses Carey, Don Willhoit , Stephen Halkiotis
Shirley Marshall and John Hartwell
As residents of Orange County and land owners either on or
very close to potential airport sites #8 and #11 , we would like
to emphatically express our unanimous views about positioning
the airport right in the midst of our residential and
agricultural land. '
We all invested not only our time and money, but our
lifestyles into the area because of the quality of the land and
environment , its location and its zoning of
Agricultural-Residential .
The land is zoned Agricultural-Residential , is being used
by the people as Agricultural-Residential and should remain
zoned as Agricultural-Residential .
In the name of progress , this airport will pollute our
wetlands , the air , the natural environment , create excessive
noise levels and destroy the value of our agricultural and
residential land.
We feel it is totally unjust for the Commissioners to
exercise their power of Eminent Domain to force us away from our
land for merely speculative reasons for the need of the airport .
We unitedly agree not to sell our land for the use of the
airport , and feel it will be financially unpractical for the
county to pay for the destruction the airport will cause to the
quality of our land, improvements and lifestyles .
NAME ,
, ADDRESS ! TAX#
• a/Po• ''' ILde I
I .. i
I
1 A0 .....111- /EMI— v //A .■:.--.. A. A I . 1
r , 1 1 i
idel&;477)77420,_ V i/c 7121 idel&it let : N. 1 S
t I l 1
Ott-XI 431 L1,1)-1.49),/-1 IO aq Lll-r- "tio,14ffet-fy : qq, I
,,, , .-7-;„.
1 .
We De4 1.1f-FAZIA, Wet-46: il q . -1
, fr,70,...,.4 :
c:"" ',I f .
6- (jil.qicet,...4.-,-- :.,1-S-aw I 114. 1,0 ; // ;hi u ti c.I. . : 1+4. ) I VA
...-- U .
fi
• .
0'1.44(0 I t
irt,e,.--e. t , 6,- iedgot---s--•' i 0,CD 4( 1ff t.t., (..) 1 ":-. - I. .C.• :
., .4 /A. : %--1 " • • ' ' i ... 7a.
i
1
6 , " e a IN. -
,
. . . i
r Or I—
: ,p i Roc 3 t --!--fet/1%1,4 4
6---nz
• II i
i a 7 0 r . . 4 _
.624,4 -t„, c / 1-.,.... ,
4 i Ae.{145-A F ILL/ Ae__. .
--
1 ,/ f (k. , I
! k ( 'x4 6 .011-All iVe - i
. , : Ai(( • ,
.. • N ■-y
`-...?(42•x -A A A2:?±2,10y2);(221;, / a .). i .. ..: ,c1 ,,
, i e 7," • — ....(e't);,. •!/. , k-,
. i
1 _.
1
. .
To : Orange County Commissioners
Moses Carey, Don Willhoit , Stephen Halkiotis
Shirley Marshall and John Hartwell
As residents of Orange County and land owners either on or
very close to potential airport sites #8 and #11 , we would like
to emphatically express our unanimous views about positioning
the airport right in the midst of our residential and
agricultural land.
We all invested not only our time and money, but our
lifestyles into the area because of the quality of the land and
environment , its location and its zoning of
Agricultural-Residential .
The land is zoned Agricultural-Residential , is being used
by the people as Agricultural-Residential and should remain
zoned as Agricultural-Residential .
In the name of progress , this airport will pollute our
wetlands , the air , the natural environment , create excessive
noise levels and destroy the value of our agricultural and
residential land.
We feel it is totally unjust for the Commissioners to
exercise their power of Eminent Domain to force us away from our
land for merely speculative reasons for the need of the airport .
We unitedly agree not to sell our land for the use of the
airport , and feel it will be financially unpractical for the
county to pay for the destruction the airport will cause to the
quality of our land, improvements and lifestyles .
NAME ,
, ADDRESS '
, TAXI
. ' !
2 ._..... •,,r- ' - f : tfrke/Y4
...A_-,... .i: ., .......,.e....r ' /
tesikAL1471-4) .
t 1
I #
C- -,e pipe.„ 1 R./Az eery z in.e6e., .7,4 r :
,/ _ • ,
AV , A ; /e)1140. vildzIG Y-3 ,
. ; t
4._. _ _...1'. ../ - _ LIM A .' i ' or. .i., 7 1/4t-kort,„
0 ,
, ,
. ilt .--2
I ,
_ .. 1 4 i r . .._ ....L.-Ar . . — 4111 EI 4 I 1
7 .,- A / I - 2- (0- 6, e, - y/7,..Ea.tpkyA0y,.c . ,72:16, z,
t
./, . i
ge.-0-0i14.i. 1/1.7a--/z444e---1 -F.2' 51'11"4-e,--az-----e. til e - : vAfra p
1
,
i--2-- `x-)--c-eto-ii4 - c-; - ,, vcr. / L.,
/77
.0s.L3oes a 4 - i 0 _ .-yi /
: 0.. ..., . - ,• Aw....,,,iev..; 4140
,
.
.,.. ,./....• ,.... ....edlr-ogisir I tilLg 8 a x f 7/3-9'970.4.2,1
4 -.&ti-41 lc) •C . 7t- --) it?in( ('.././.. "-'1,1,7 01:-=,, , A•/I ■,,I.4. t---7
. .
To: Orange County Commissioners
Moses Carey, Don Willhoit , Stephen Halkiotis
Shirley Marshall and John Hartwell
As residents of Orange County and land owners either on or
very close to potential airport sites #0 and fill , we would like
to emphatically express our unanimous views about positioning
the airport right in the midst of our residential and
agricultural land.
We all invested not only our time and money, but our
lifestyles into the area because of the quality of the land and
environment , its location and its zoning of
Agricultural-Residential .
The land is zoned Agricultural-Residential , is being used
by the people as Agricultural-Residential and should remain
zoned as Agricultural-Residential .
In the name of progress , this airport will pollute our
wetlands , the air, the natural environment , create excessive
noise levels and destroy the value of our agricultural and
residential land.
We feel it is totally unjust for the Commissioners to
exercise their power of Eminent Domain to force us away from our
land for merely speculative reasons for the need of the airport .
We unitedly agree not to sell our land for the use of the
airport , and feel it will be financially unpractical for the
county to pay for the destruction the airport will cause to the
quality of our land, improvements and lifestyles.
&J.:64" ADaOt
1 ,,c,e7. 7ailzil2e4AME ADDRESS aiii‘eiti, pz) 6:k 92? Ai ' . TAX#s‘w9i/ittk, r.,
,
„ - r/3- ii- .._ 4.. /1‘. e... 1 . ' a -
-Jr
c ...2.-- , / - -7 • 1 pc, sor , -1--XI' /4,13 'V 9-y-, 1/
. i
,
. ,
J-r rd / AffroilL -1.- if . £- ibt, 44 il. -.„.....t. .
.
: t—A ./..is 1 ML a C :
10 -10 a
a
Xfob metAN( . i 9.f(-. 66.
..5., i . , .
, .....
I '7,'
Wir. "7— fio- -
4/,‘,4', -.' (...6 3
. AlrifirdW ,
, •
. • . g Y 7X
) 0 o ,
. ,
a_< __ e/. A , fue i fri4 sox, Y 9 -;'.e.-eit...,4—,,,f e
4_112? ,,,t. ■ 4.1417_
'' ---01—
1 de4,21b_ _ :_ye • :
, i
C il
• _..) 4 (AL/ i I/ .11 if I/ ,/
______
To: Orange County Commissioners
Moses Carey, Don Willhoit , Stephen Halkiotis
Shirley Marshall and John Hartwell
As residents of Orange County and land owners either on or
very close to potential airport sites #8 and fill , we would like
to emphatically express our unanimous views about positioning
the airport right in the midst of our residential and
agricultural, land.
We all invested not only our time and money, but our
lifestyles into the area because of the quality of the land and
environment , its location and its zoning of
Agricultural-Residential .
The land is zoned Agricultural-Residential , is being used
by the people as Agricultural-Residential and should remain
zoned as Agricultural-Residential .
In the name of progress, this airport will pollute our
wetlands , the air , the natural environment , create excessive
noise levels and destroy the value of our agricultural and
residential land.
We feel it is totally unjust for the Commissioners to
exercise their power of Eminent Domain to force us away from our
land for merely speculative reasons for the need of the airport .
We unitedly agree not to sell our land for the use of the
airport, and feel it will be financially unpractical for the
county to pay for the destruction the airport will cause to the
quality of our land, improvements and lifestyles.
1
1 .
NAME '
, ADDRESS '
, TAX#
f i 1
" • I
I: 0-:I. •l ' t, .
, . .
„,,,,,•
J c.a.....".e.A.-ii ;RI' .%) ALclit .141.-- [-- —,--
,•.'friva4}4-'42 ' "... ,
' ' . .? )7—eir. --AW
11-41. Y1:3e9A- sitt.
.°
• 1
1
. , ..)' 71/..A.."-e Y1,(" ,
.
:,
-
/, , .
i Z st , ::.!......A II 1 -•if 1°'•••• .' -,.".:-.4.4 ti:I /I
.,6. 4
# &/.9( if&/.9( ,
ii3i ". i4.67 #24/1i..)e- h. ipr r NC 1 W (,/ Ott, 7
(
Ceti( 6./ 1-4i), , 1 i it li-Y.Lt-P- 7
.
. I 1
,
2 P
97t,e1.,,i-ks /"ii C.
1 (-1‘ , 7_24
/ / , • , i
la 1 - fr
(
•Imin!.. - ./-
: I t
afirmen. . • .., e- e fa,
t (146 NA.
.. .
t . i,
0 ,
i (A 7 2-ti 3 1
----
. .
To: Orange County Commissioners
Moses Carey, Don Willhoit , Stephen Halkiotis
Shirley Marshall and John Hartwell
As residents of Orange County and land owners either on or
very close to potential airport sites #8 and #11 , we would like
to emphatically express our unanimous views about positioning
the airport right in the midst of our residential and
agricultural land.
We all invested not only our time and money , but our
lifestyles into the area because of the quality of the land and
environment , its location and its zoning of
Agricultural-Residential .
The land is zoned Agricultural-Residential , is being used
by the people as Agricultural-Residential and should remain
zoned as Agricultural-Residential .
In the name of progress, this airport will pollute our
wetlands , the air , the natural environment , create excessive
noise levels and destroy the value of our agricultural and
residential land.
We feel it is totally unjust for the Commissioners to
exercise their power of Eminent Domain to force us away from our
land for merely speculative reasons for the need of the airport .
qe unitedly agree not to sell our land for the use of the
4itport , and feel it will be financially unpractical for the
county to pay for the destruction the airport will cause to the
quality of our land, improvements and lifestyles .
NAME ADDRESS ! TAX#
i ') 1 A
11:th OAZ It et/Y-1,003' .) a .7 (4722.1,..),y _ . -2,y) -1 l)11,61,
.4J
i . 1
, .,...-...""-.' „., I 11 I 1
"J.,4 raiwitiler7 /..e.i.,/tv..1-w, :fl c / /)0:i 1 Cv-7 ou n ot e.. tip ifs i-01)r...ch
,,,., 1
s Jelme:1 F:-A/vow . 'k :/ct• 1) 1.3e v r.3 - 1.3 cAnfri, n/C., :
. i be 1
.24r-- 0/7#- .01 4
. ,
i .
, .
. .
, .
—.I-
- ___
To: Orange County Commissioners
Moses Carey, Don Willhoit , Stephen Halkiotls
Shirley Marshall and John Hartwell
As residents of Orange County and land owners either on or
very close to potential airport sites #8 and ill , we would like
to emphatically express our unanimous views about positioning
the airport right in the midst of our residential and
agricultural land.
We all invested not only our time and money, but our
lifestyles into the area because of the quality of the land and
environment , its location and its zoning of
Agricultural-Residential .
The land is zoned Agricultural-Residential , is being used
by the people as Agricultural-Residential and should remain
zoned as Agricultural-Residential .
In the name of progress , this airport will pollute our
wetlands , the air , the natural environment, create excessive
noise levels and destroy the value of our agricultural and
residential land.
We feel it is totally unjust for the Commissioners to
exercise their power of Eminent Domain to force us away from our
land for merely speculative reasons for the need of the airport .
We unitedly agree not to sell our land for the use of the
airport , and feel it will be financially unpractical for the
county to pay for the destruction the airport will cause to the
quality of our land, improvements and lifestyles .
NA0
ADDRESS 1
TAX#
• •
• I _
11 .c . it Y'.1
— ,
Con
1 /06) 061-60
r 6r(5-1)4, k ./
• •
'-7/P/Wiaelh--7Ait 44C)/1 WI., 64
fi
tv,!14,,vt, • .111,11411A--- y(±detc.
I
1 •
.51bira Roca erthl lt,..11-. -le.fla-i
., . 1?---i fe;g5ie i I
To: Orange County Commissioners
Moses Carey, Don Willhoit , Stephen Halkiotis 1
Shirley Marshall and John Hartwell
As residents of Orange County and land owners either on or
very close to potential airport sites #0 and #11 , we would like
to emphatically express our unanimous views about positioning
the airport right in the midst of our residential and
agricultural land.
• We all invested not only our time and money, but our
lifestyles into the area because of the quality of the land and
environment, its location and its zoning of
Agricultural-Residential .
The land is zoned Agricultural-Residential , is. being used
by the people as Agricultural-Residential and should remain
zoned as Agricultural-Residential .
In the name of progress, this airport will pollute our
wetlands, the air, the natural environment , create excessive
noise levels and destroy the value of our agricultural and
residential land.
We feel it is totally unjust for the Commissioners to
exercise their power of Eminent Domain to force us away from our
Wenctlinf(t)red1111.7:ljeepnglialnimlenr7altoirfVrietNectils:fotihzh:irport .
airport, and feel it will be financially unpractical for the
county to pay for the destruction the airport will cause to the
quality of our land, improvements and lifestyles.
•
NAME ,
, ADDRESS '
, TAX#
:
,
. .
Rt. 2- akc4C-. AL1
4rive 1414
Q I 1 i
._ I 0 ,
AAA. AL 1 A4
1 1
• 1 .
tpl ,C,i .;". tel1.a,at .
ef 2 0
M-
,-,-zie,y.1,-,,, ii,i,„ ...., ,i/c.I. A7.6
, A ,
41-a-11-9---,41.ei.
A: , 79,-2.,./...4otg1 I kell a le e 4. 71Caetap 714 : .1, 3
, 0 , 7 • i ' ,
&''1'1'.,A -6 Ar4W40 S4 C.I a 1
1 1 4
I...a C A '. , At ..L. .• di Ad ' ./., A 1 ., 4 —,V1
. ... ___
, .
Pit.c-6 .- ?LC-. ;Olt 2-. 1 _
, i
----V":"—• • 1 .
1 •
...... fekl. •2(R, _. 1,_ a
) 1 - 017-434
AjPel-t4-1,-, _
/ ....
I I
40301Mair I I
. O kAii .. :37,9..3 '.
ae 3 Vild 46
1 Po6 V14 '.1c.ie.(.51.4.1)(... ,-iill
. .
6014- VI' Thtti
To: Orange County Commissioners
Moses Carey, Don Willhoit , Stephen Halkiotis
Shirley Marshall and John Hartwell
As residents of Orange County and land owners either on or
very close to potential airport sites #8 and #11 , we would like
to emphatically express our unanimous views about positioning
the airport right in the midst of our residential and
agricultural land.
We all invested not only our time and money, but our
lifestyles into the area because of the quality of the land and
environment, its location and its zoning of
Agricultural-Residential .
The land is zoned Agricultural-Residential , is being used
by the people as Agricultural-Residential and should remain
zoned as Agricultural-Residential .
In the name of progress, this airport will pollute our
wetlands, the air, the natural environment , create excessive
noise levels and destroy the value of our agricultural and
residential land.
We feel it is totally unjust for the Commissioners to
exercise their power of Eminent Domain to force us away from our
,
I land for merely speculative reasons for the need of the airport .
We unitedly agree not to sell our land for the use of the
airport , and feel it will be financially unpractical for the
county to pay for the destruction the airport will cause to the
quality of our land, improvements and lifestyles.
(/" .—) NAME '
, ADDRESS '
, TAX#
r 1 ,
pi...1i 1 -sg‘'./1;ketik , "•/?1 ,'
W.iiidealial.*mz.B.)PolleR92 (--4146/ .4.,a7e,-abls
,
J., . -60;r5hip et e efilr
& —46,.... — k....,—(—. ........ ' ;Lg. 2-1 --AriL„.'. 41 E . 1.
1 1
.ve,. 1
Alt,/ A /
/ . / ' 0. 1 I / / :__/ , 71.IC. 3 )4.-
-..4e.. -.. %......-Gdoell-.-.46_ •
.
IF .
i
' tke- 1 ±1_' I ieraL 1 iLsfICI ' ,7-2bv/ I '-I- (1`'7•Z 4 b?‘ C-.
1 1
I 1
I I
I 1
, .
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 I
: I
1
1 i
1 .
: 1
t I
1 1
L :
1
I :
e 1
t I
. .
To: Orange County Commissioners
Moses Carey, Don Willhoit , Stephen Halkiotis
Shirley Marshall and John Hartwell
As residents of Orange County and land owners either on or
very close to potential airport sites #8 and #11 , we would like
to emphatically express our unanimous views about positioning
the airport right in the midst of our residential and
agricultural land.
We all invested not only our time and money, but our
lifestyles into the area because of the quality of the land and
environment , its location and its zoning of
Agricultural-Residential .
The land is zoned Agricultural-Residential , is being used
by the people as Agricultural-Residential and should remain
zoned as Agricultural-Residential .
In the name of progress, this airport will pollute our
wetlands, the air , the natural environment, create excessive
noise levels and destroy the value of our agricultural and
residential land.
We feel it is totally unjust for the Commissioners to
exercise their power of Eminent Domain to force us away from our
land for merely speculative reasons for the need of the airport .
We unitedly agree not to sell our land for the use of the
airport , and feel it will be financially unpractical for the
county to pay for the destruction the airport will cause to the
quality of our land, improvements and lifestyles.
NA ,
, ADDRESS ,
, TAX#
,
<//041,0 041: ■-30 4)) V31-tiln,i. ' A ad_ 9- t-t.,3
_ ...i J
. ....1„.
i 3o -6 ,441,,,f 6,,,de
yei J i ,.,2. - D cae...eiaL eed, PP 41 II. 2 Al
,
c-7-_-\9-.,045.1. 4;:intat-",e4) i
. 14.(4.9ivit
,e 01, or- i :II 0 1,..&-
IV
,
- 061. W-loca ; # t,c-4.1"., 2,/,j. e. !4-444..st
, i A
lf"GrA4241744- i 144#7 e,7"1-/ed--Aii t 77, CI i t19-6.; `"0(14-
Maliti-- - it.6)-“," ag 1 A3-4417 .6 eA-4_,,„(7 11C : 49, 3 Az
",..r • -i
f
/4 j 19
tirt i I
J/LC"tlib \..LCUill,ttc- 44t' ■ /2/4 / 41/1)/ .6) 6CtPC di 71-C-1 1-I-
4 c , -;
: 4-#i kn -t'. 4E-6A-v4 it. gti ic/k--
, o-yi ,..3,11), i
i
i
..--..t?„.......7\ _A _
) 697 11- ` .i ,
v .
k 1 0
) .,t 1 :.-. P. 1,1 .. I. Iv' 7.4. .._,A. ... ...•-1 I
1 ' _
Il 1 ‘
.. . .
To : Orange County Commissioners
Moses Carey, Don Willhoit , Stephen Halkiotis
Shirley Marshall and John Hartwell
As residents of Orange County and land owners either on or
very close to potential airport sites #8 and #11 , we would like
to emphatically express our unanimous views about positioning
the airport right in the midst of our residential and
agricultural land.
We all invested not only our time and money, but our
lifestyles into the area because of the quality of the land and
environment , its location and its zoning of
Agricultural-Residential .
The land is zoned Agricultural-Residential , is being used
by the people as Agricultural-Residential and should remain
zoned as Agricultural-Residential .
In the name of progress, this airport will pollute our
wetlands, the air , the natural environment , create excessive
noise levels and destroy the value of our agricultural and
residential land.
We feel it is totally unjust for the Commissioners to
exercise their power of Eminent Domain to force us away from our
land for merely speculative reasons for the need of the airport .
We unitedly agree not to sell our land for the use of the
airport , and feel it will be financially unpractical for the
county to pay for the destruction the airport will cause to the
quality of our land, improvements and lifestyles.
NAME , ADDRESS '
, TAX#
19Ii/i.a 4Atazi2,
: R.T.- lfr-0-77e C era eidi •
I
: LH- 6 b-
I4'q
A)C il (+ tt i Ctr
afIr-o.4 .4_,,acceily iGt /
, ,,..)
c,..-r 1 E :, a.- S1-- _1 t. . (-1- 4-, (fID
,
I RI . I eti 4,4{..ee e 0
: (1-11-, 0Q
I,
/"re. .. ,-//,,,,,e. , .C. 0
44: ;1 V Ye, (.
, /, ,
„Afeteee-e Aldpeet, : 4.1;"& . / e -‘4-4,44 1/ •e ' : (fit s' 0)
t
f t
Li lair)Cid 4(11-n.eL) i
I . I geil•leir0 'fr.. i ti,Lt. tif-
.-).4/KeiN-NV6A,
i__' / kW y/ efi ' , ,
1 .
..) 44 ik A.., . 0 F •' 1 IL r_ 4. 'I P
., _ ...• _ ' 47;
1 r
&1- (C `'Air ,
: /ex ayc29 f-- 9/4.,,,./ ,
i 9
? -
,-• -
TO THE COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE COUNTY
WE THE CONCERNED CITIZENS OF ORANGE COUNTY ARE UNITED IN
OPPOSITION TO YOUR PROPOSED GENERAL AIRPORT
NAME • ADDRESS PHONE
Ono lt. h').-17)c: I Rf 7 aox ce lo 3.e> chapei -1-h 1( • 9,2 q-31-Th
,ctirciLotr--(3 ,e. 1, i„: 'Is‘ ,eakivE5 564. .: 4 933-g6ga
kiil 67- The_ v.-llecera- 40,---2---+, Ce2174"f4' 4.1"336)
4e1V-72S—\ fi) gtke;t1) (tee/ Or , c , /4 , ??3- ao 1 ;
Saiv, 1-W) 1 a 14 Wilk )Roca 0.192t0 i-kie.i q33-- goz/
i \ : $AstArow,N t% lol c ovotill N' Gts--loct-c,
4 / Z:2) 6d/ avfid-Xi/# Cg-
/ LL
It/ (364.0
/7( -II/79 17_, ro 5 Am2r4z‘-"Ici p/L'
,z____A. t......at___4........._
)1:tf512-00,0(.,j1.1 pc 27-17 t ev-11_,.. 0y/c . .
Mi 3 • peZA 5.' 7')
A X.. 2 7a 7S
dlaitaa4dizt/
, 4/7L3 Zeee ,S'704, -7/Illakpiewe
gs-i, 4,
24- 3 30A--6di-6 fefiibelfen.t..4))
• S .
, -41'` l'?'"P• A.-, 5- , k.,,.,
t fyi -6 ri?
Hvv ive-s-y-
oi. y sy qcf-2.._473B7
, .
. .., . • . .
TO THE COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE COUNTY
WE THE CONCERNED CITIZENS OF ORANGE COUNTY ARE UNITED IN
OPPOSITION TO YOUR PROPOSED GENERAL AIRPORT
NAME - ADDRESS PHONE
Ic6AigIcair co4:7 7/7
• G Lir-0.A,, 1 1/4),A,u Ri-3,kys(967 ( It;ill)tov)1( la_ct-W6
-... I - I (posTc5-va.AAAA-fcceduifrofrit civr_42,17g •
/ ' II
pfA-1..tvi. 0, cmy72e..--- $4 48-3?-/e
27(z--;.6...,;9,4e64,66 AM(7a74<4.
eiKdfoie, f,.... W"7 —P27
AO/V/ - EC/ova-4 rri. 6- Ai-re4;14.4,4/,==,2 F67 -0W
‘7e4LW440.4446- Jae /..). 610-,e,d, cza . 91,9-0o9. 7
quiv.a. ohi, tgo 696%6 dub ealCambia4V-Y q(14 -00)44
diaditAw 30? igram4rotice., Drive, qq0-0073
AWACt-CC-Pl(Pld) c4D1 eakatika, 0\pF- cpci-exis
Ccumbetto,-ne a3510..
(„45,171an .--C .4;1,0 416v-Xc35-7 64,4dVe-a "/C/ fr°1141
I "6 1' '"A- auor rta-r)H-- goe-f(o 1
(it . 3 q TE,lieldoe z, Ceuta— %6-ioi
'
aAit-D •)- - ,v)/e/ ,41c -0, 14 966 - /I0
J2 /2 c SX,ge a c- / 968 6q5-L.-
- 761 6 Xee'e-ts-dt a&e7 ;z/tit6 -t -. r.3 3---o Ogp
/ 7/8 ,-/'-/./5 (rerg(N, Fa-a0-571
(44/1
CR.14{-Ata- ett-aPglitif
1 c(33-53 etc
yowv41,6e. h/t , ilviuoes, ieKtia,1 s- 6, ,,(8,0, ai)6ii , TO --co
-
/e,,0 6.-1- .-)),-0 e, 167, SO4 .
1
To the Commissioners of Orange County:
I
We, the concerned citizens of Orange County, are united in opposition
to your proposed regional airport.
Name j Address Phone
1,A,1 9'° 1 o e'S. C ` eer.3 g 33
,'� "11 & / , , � -`
Li l ` a .," arall A,. 9'f 1-6g
C 14 '4 - • , `3°C feQ/-w�. ..//t}'-, . r6 7—6- -z 7 Co
lb
arl-din 0 .vra 14 - hex /O q6 -cll
_liz.z. (, ,_.e,c_perl /rf. 7 edx/I Z ri 7 ail 7
$go iTaiw`e// / 6)'Y 2.-elY5-
an .„_ 1, :4A4,1_, Ao! ,•• A- sr _ i. 9 27' Q
/ / / . •Z.. .4 _r...K... o ,.c.:....., • , _. ft'-. t1.�c-r. . x-40 36'?
IVI 1 t!;.'°!!y' • U r -- • .
li �� ._._ . �.�,.-H(1--(.. . c _ f 6,r • 61(0 '
J/ � / .��!� L' �� ' �3 .. _.6 „i%411 1, 'VI C., , Q6�O D�'l
fir ,.1. , JJIJJLL. . �' '6-'7- col
c, - i ~ - (`nc, u4.f..., c I. _ i 1-1, 11
___M„,al-r-,e..., 1.-x)-e.x-r-4231-. (1. Loll ...1_ Ilk ' 1 (cari ^ 11j G .
' C,z, C G (- 01 (N`) -- "613
• v � 1 fl/MD I t r /
,r"d It (7.g3 394i
1
TO THE COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE COUNTY
WE THE CONCERNED CITIZENS OF ORANGE COUNTY ARE UNITED IN
OPPOSITION TO YOUR PROPOSED REGIONAL AIRPORT
Name Address Phone
J-c,-43 --t
ic
• 11 h
7_44, zil76 oz,41/0-aet Oc760
4, .itg r• 040, kic efoe„-
A . C,, ileuzAtltS (91— C)o Avt 7140 gig'
0 Imo ;/ 27a fo
9 2336 gri
? Ael-ce,„„ 1,,,c
2_67,
4) 11'? /p .,,i/iff- 197ge).4
•
TO THE COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE COUNTY
•
WE THE CONCERNED CITIZENS OF ORANGE COUNTY ARE UNITED IN
OPPOSITION TO YOUR PROPOSED REGIONAL AIRPORT
Name Address Phone
/ /a c- 23'570
r sL LC 1 U
•
TO THE COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE COUNTY
WE THE CONCERNED CITIZENS OF ORANGE COUNTY ARE UNITED IN •
OPPOSITION TO YOUR PROPOSED REGIONAL AIRPORT
Name Address Phone
&X lam ,- — A) C, 74I 3
To the Commissioners of Orange County:
We, the concerned citizens of Orange County, are united in opposition
to your proposed regional airport.
Name Address Phone
fb� r 3ock C61-c_L S4. C 7,2,5 a6-001{z
�1
L 1,.. -k lO . C' lac- 15-1-5123-..1
- A /tBUx3ptc ry..../f/c Z511
' ' : - �! . • � - l cA WI( l_ wa-2650
isse in 6¢te1-, f2flnSdh. Cbeeer cid ti-c
•
ill
_ .
TO THE COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE COUNTY
WE THE CONCERNED CITIZENS OF ORANGE COUNTY ARE UNITED IN
OPPOSITION TO YOUR PROPOSED REGIONAL AIRPORT
Name Address Phone
81L 4 6d)( 3ag
laic i iiii ' 11 MO ed 7 Ai - 1 '
c5--k/./7 ,-2•b4010-7,-, za x Li/-ena.. 6,,00k Id eXiifg.t .Aldj, 2.71-A, 9.2,-.2,02./.
(9k, -.1 610 .---14/ , 9a -z?t■
lid ,i-474 ,4.1,—, _ (0i („41:4,Zoc 6.--;;-.4 cg,
76,4
A-- (bi- to cii,-,t. 3s-fi- N.4.--6)—R kiw i\le_ 9v2-z461_3
L
P ,.„.4)ev-aP.1-- / 0 5 6 (A.vvs-i- v\ CA- Ail C.'\ 131 (IV
1 )p ,03 Apzip-A.."
41M
• . ---:-
r/ of 4 ,,,
e/" e.W6 WA OA .2 7571' 9f0---P e,3
........ f 1, ,.,
(1. ,Le-e..-- 2_1'5 Witk, f1,..4...-le
et 0
po215 4 fit.f& L. k ckil-Pah ; 0 q viZ 0;1 5
1 6c,"AI--
fig r14a.rnd if/ 6,14.74,8. 167,107
0
.... --, . , _ _ .... .... 4" -....._...11...17(
C• •
i
71-4- NI%111,k....,,, c.,1470M 'Wgr i 114
I •
I —
I .
I .
am
- . .
. TO THE COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE COUNTY
WE THE CONCERNED CITIZENS OF ORANGE COUNTY ARE UNITED IN
OPPOSITION TO YOUR PROPOSED REGIONAL AIRPORT
Name Address Phone
.Iipt
, • .. ,. ItA 0 r ./. 4:rar
9
20 /.„,vt.--i
...... t.Afg) C...9...A..... 4v..k, s•Lkor,,,A4 cLe ‘
ILA,, 115.
(---v--k- i "‘-s "(1-" 1
.
4/,-6:4 Jt4/sal ge-f- 3 8, 5 , 34-14e-k) - , .,a(- ' 7. 75,/
iitiL dt‘yij itv ffe- ' a Arad) AL' Pi
i•.41 ".A ..&_ *4'4• v . -A-- i e) 4—.1741L 1 A .-4A46.4,—..2.-/ 49, 44:: 4 . -•2_,„‘
I 4.■ r- QC) AKle 4 q 410
, . ..• .4 . .... Z1 _44-4, /
Alit 0 PALI 'errn(I2c IV& 0 Si t‘i a k .':s .-'“ii
A vyul... Atiolvr (4-ri Lar-r.a.AAftsQ, ..cf.N._,_.. qYzci-(37
— - —K9---------'
974- 5132_
•
i ...
, , I(k OJ ape avt.ae,,,te, '729493g.
&cf.". ty;stotoono, li 1,6 Seuey,,„ ,e, • qiii._ 25-3.7„
114A/6" 4411441A- 1)- 6 as--14/40 Aid-... iqZ-C7e5
0 • (i,3 ° A/ ,'
1 II .
. '
TO THE COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE COUNTY
WE THE CONCERNED CITIZENS OF ORANGE COUNTY ARE UNITED IN !
OPPOSITION TO YOUR PROPOSED REGIONAL AIRPORT
Name Address Phone
hi . Al 3Mere4 H(2/44, /669- S ,-.-
If'
/Iii .t i O -2(, r A .4, i , We-'9,-1.5404- (0-firmie- eb
g471;,1 edtINe,N : C6 C enile-b t+4.-1 41
,
(
/ro fr-4-01-t..,t,,i_„,,,,je ac.44 92_-?--6/ 7
7°'le-
g" &11"a ZO-O / 6 2,,,..e,,A 4 4 get ...-- 37 S--o?IrrS"-'
% -coil-
SPAirritp#L-- wilco- INA- cur,40,_ ga_____.
O. "
t-- i
kiVN) / au,/ 4 - 1 „g,„-- , , WC.
CIP -,,-"' , f , • 4
' A 1 I IA 1i1 A.A a 0* Oa oxice... it,A. Ai L. , - s: tr • ' --""itxri
■4"
1 A 4--t-) t Fs ilinco. 6- qi oem ; (\Cr)on chape,1 14; U .V61 -7N
a vi
f /415 I a-5- M all rot CI- 133---asTei
1 Jevie Cati4i 1 0+ C) 5cp-c, ct,„-t-EVIScc,
1 lk
1 0 5 Cr 110/1/Ch 5(
- Ca_ 444AMIAN-
I /WAAL 94-
I
1 . 0 •
30 6 iiiktem) ubr Itt-e- _ 97g7-i/2-5
To the Commissioners of Orange County:
We, the concerned citizens of Orange County, are united in opposition
to your proposed regional airport.
Name Address Phone
scre.t,,; it,au„J !/a f97,,dd ,O'. X67 o '1
IV, .1 1041 ti�. 1; 9'6 p $7-s6 Ck
.s1 4, 6 '3 (0 _ q67-0767
44 4tTy < --/,tr fir s. f.„ o. 96 7` -y 7 d
.,7 te,.., - %•:if €//, r if • -0(c; "......,_-_,
- r iiff 2/2.g*1A, 9 Ya- EgleP4
i >/ r
--eei, .„...e'. .,...,-- 676-.9:,4---dew 00” a?Ar,
. 11' - s-0 Ei,A,k QV.- -Cif--
904/Lizt. Ly.4 ter` I LX ZO N •1 zilltr) (o Cr) 91'77213
lifiKo VatArt. tiro a .RX 00-16c 1))r 131 i4 S 9-q 4 5-4-1
i
i,L.A.4 7 6.a Teiv 7 Cc tL rjCeF et)7
I -./} II f 7 7
-c d
' I I.'Lial._%....: . 203 ti ce Sv< W - - .
I
r,sr"7
1 01344), n c-► Jc Lie. Lana- ' S'/GE)
44A l rtoiLAA.1 bp I, Agcy 4 2rily ek-1-x'302.._.- .
/ ', (k_5 Otft G644( kb q(68"-(1W7
14 -fig../A42--- g2:2:7-,fiktr&lat! GT , q 6 s9vie
-4s-061444.Jiw, (0 67.,4:e.-Awf-1-4,,,,e,, ilci,7—L-ra.
S'
..,_„„,c► '.,_, PA :Li c2Gl : ` 141(6 .. _ 3`C1
d� /(/J M.�
111., lI ' c5- -- At- 9) $ 990
.,.---
To the Commissioners of Orange County:
We, the concerned citizens of Orange County, are united in opposition
to your proposed regional airport.
Name Address Phone
L. 4 . . .16 7 • i.ovvi , ,S/ ° --.362'
MiliM AI "L'I •' d> ck9Q--V(9
_ ,.....,
— 1A 2 i li' 4e' es.-i i II ,t *". 27.69 2.S '
' -WMOPMVPIMMINIOPPAP7
0 —"dr: ,• JI ...a—....."-4e-4 AiLr
\At idiNAINIMINT 01,01)-41e- G f • .9-2-4 '-.2403
C, c----, e,"./ ,. c/qI ,- - -
4
411/111APAI ,__ 2 +/-7? 2
••
AIMPTAMIMMIMIlf.- W,4. _. 4
ilkIta
4, - 'M'' IL* • (0 m... - - ---C-1/49.9S2.- eg) .
,rwedwAr ... AP Atoi (20k# 'pl" 01; F6728%7
it 04,PMIMINF ' H. 8 /
- .-.' 1/4247-14-
., 2 i:, c9i 4e_z) 44, . k , _Al, €462s15-TR,
/1-7
La .zC
lb
1111%, , -e
, C . //C--- 96 7,-.P .45,6'
VrflrftIMNIWIMMIIIM "( ,
t 1 0._ ...AAA A.A I. I A / ,rdi_I. 1.4 1 - AAA Ali , 4(( I
4 _/. .., • Ad / MP*. . 0-7 11A_. . u. L.,.. C ni C- '7
ad..., 54b k Cekk. I'Dy-,, '?-ck\ILNe c. r 1 c 4-'7?lq
I c ...,...... / 136 A A-, /42-70/ IV C. .543- ,
4051111 tiktkkgsfolk .-.. -36 " ' / cia-q- C.GG
, +0
'Aug (144/ / itine r 0 / OK- ' ild
WAPAAj ' 1- , • 3R0 evu.O., (W •CIA- - 1-6 I (
X11,y 7ife- - -7 .56goidle. Pt. Dui/i44244. (t143 - I5----171"
--tkritke, /4.4pe 6 $ztkeitlyttir to c :Ace Liq.3-37a
ir,e4VA/Lia,/,---- ‘ 44-q14:4 .el..-- c, tlf 973-,7_41c
,
-- -
To the Commissioners of Orange County:
We, the concerned citizens of Orange County, are united in opposition
to your proposed regional airport.
Name , address Phone..... ,.?: , ss—c, 4if A ....5g.3, c,„„-6..-.
(.res- �: C;eeQ. z 0 941.1-5-‘91
,r� it.y '- _ . `� /% I '//a W lit, ' - Dr. firr etl'x
13124..„.1- ,�.C,'aa1 1 1 D j3.ar't e. •c Coy/r 6.,r0 J- s . '7"''4S'—Sr'5t5`io
i ,i,, ,2antingt, tart0 F....tx, %IA . t ___. 14 s-cs-i cks5-
illiniiiiliM '.4 ii: at "' .. 11,
- -
t )
�
r'
i I rrWr 4 PI r""4 PI I I I I Fl
ce.,...„-tt, e?.c. "citi %.2,04....tdAadem,14641. Lomi40400,4tpc aa.,v(4,4
a( -rtd St-r keen I o-rdl c o'+ ' alaa,A , nC
Olin RoSeep 0644AAJI. (.1/.0'4r1 l a va t
N ,
r yot i/A - iikA C ?Q944442•¢1 64-4..t_ G / 71
f)3 0(V
at a/t ,mot 4'234 ,firpart RV, CAjQoel t//I// 02.7S/'/
047,06444._ 1.---.11-0( At Y Arial
t 4 _ZU (..c c.r4 -4v ('. iape1 /ii// 77(5.740
A /,,,,•• ' ' e &"e e ,.-;'
/ / M �/cY
� / .fir//l�� �� - ._I i _ ./e_.. _ !�....1.. ..r.�/_/
c 1 v c)i /iv-D ' 'f7 ' " C-"ftr4 ill U. AX. ..2..`?67 o
/0 -:-./: ' 2475/g
0 _ 2/.' 4 IL_ Y„_:, 1 • 0 0 /At ' IL'0 AL. ' At Al / AlA 1 i - 7elir
WOW"/AV', <, '',lir .4' ,,. --
�.. #5�-�4 ' no at;0 , _ i B! h 9-7 IS
i
t :t.' a .08 CV °ai> A -,C '. 1., '- • . NC. Z 1
To the Commissioners of Orange County:
We, the concerned citizens of Orange County, are united in opposition
to your proposed regional airport.
Name Address Phone
Leu% �J-- �' be+,r o 92 9- ?55?
`
e-41-e-JIVI.-4 . S-cgt-g. 1004A. aoriebt.r484 6CLO Wctzt.G
CC Q. ,carn4.an C1 D ? C , AOD tot.. td . 9 ic-,-560
v`
L 1,,.. :61- at. Al- fir- dr 7 g77 ,
L. /IN., . . ,4 et4i‘, 144/4.- g6P---ityre-
iff - 4 P.
/44) /4., 4/ 71k—cre96';
2.4 fir-joifi
., .. r . 4 � _ 1 j 1 .4, # ,-or
A ..„,
,,,,,,,,Irairy .I--F UN t✓EQS di tAKE R ers,
y .- Go H. , a u�--1-176e)
%L-„z,..:-✓ .,. % /03 ,y�✓a �i 547- a 1 07
• rjir /off.w ni( . // 07, - C,-`, fm”C Ui' ° 3./ 3-.
I . P ►>fir. • Y "' '1 1S - ,
fa/air,/ ...63/ iC /40 ,c._.4cdi II'., 04, .!`ACC 7-605 2
1 . gifrvdie Iti c cc 2 / awovet.-S q:(z '- 1?
i, 41/i .L4A Air e6ecor
.,(,/,. _,. ,. 6 - °/
Miiffig=...MAirigfiffIMAT.,1 , r
oI t k4 k Apil_.-10 q52(72_7(.
4 9Fh4We?1J O21311 DUC)%A4 1? ; ai 9,29 - zaz 31 ;
To the Commissioners of Orange County:
We, the concerned citizens of Orange County, are united in opposition
to your proposed regional airport.
Name Address Phone
10 1 J onus-(el n,, iii..(Ii-u)
ehr.vil/l
R._ Cm�cs (4)-r Li1c '� /j 1 --7S `1'S
- 7.17.5. rt.c-re,,_ t i 4 "Pt.Q,A, 54-
7A-vJ IL- 2030 5• C.4f� Sly. 4-- x-147 - P ir f i
SAvit,
14 N o zrav .57-. CA oe0 '1,09- (03 3
J As co rot'el Ctetlfr`/1 9,21 -601$
,Acs ,0 9 jk. 11 ( `7-e,,_-. g. C M 4 (1.)-(15 3 .
$4414 (ter 6-aws ter 14 60)0 44 3 Gt-I-Ar'Et, mu._ %Z. -075 2.
( 05( .. 1 .. 0 itseW) qcc 65'3
L.¢, Roi 3 i Bbk 6i1 14,1156,6.51.. INC* 7y Z-67.2
10 1 ,i —. ,etio Arai (. a) C,A Pi u, D•e_ gal-7,10.z_
ØJ4;7. 1 .4tec - 10-- ,x,„ rl /I t.0 1 . 3z
A W°k'4,t: 90.4'fi ..0.a.l b @ it_ ,e mil ne 1t a A&
1,.. �.�;_:. 6 w;... Est if-- -4: .,'t A-lc-
,
13S iir ' i Witt<< 1J(..
A.�� , ; ,!, i � t�1 plea— L/!' � i
� - U (� �
-irti. Itila�.w�l s 2. Goh� T,E,.�"ce,. C or L Chill ,u1 . 2,7$ V
0,-4 ._�At_ I... AA i —RQ i.. NA 1� . Y ,,.„ ' - A t %4 7 L 1 , gc
f eW4J 2taO4 i(We-,(Oh nv NC a7� �-i��9
.1 /32,A, / r &,y- 9?) K ?,;14.49,t2) f�•C --73c 2,.�
,,
. ,! M .4„ ,_ fn • _ . c.. 967-9619
-1 c& it/C<I7r/t1
�, f - M ��s� ire. C•N� �
kr _ 1 aSt> C-4 r .., rt. R. y ctr bc 16$1 a 7
I,I
•
To the Commissioners of Orange County:
We, the concerned citizens of Orange County, are united in opposition
to your proposed regional airport.
Name Address Phone
2/.r 4A-, Zi • 2I • .z.a / ..e.itr a. 92-7 -�f-t 74
_ / -�
:!!/4 ; ter. r�,f,. � --/... . I G • ..3 ems..^-- .� �-�'�
� �► !4,4 - O3 V( . e r r . 7
Viliffilifpnrent
/at. / /-'6„ _Le„ 4,1_,-__, 010 i fir ;_, ,,,cui-e di . " e4. !II- i'l-
42T1± "v;.-.7 r aii< ^ r, _1 ." -27` r
keg f l a be - ..'#"I 4 6,,r1 NC 2 51 v
Zee, - :. . _,, ' 6./ - _____. c"--/ z A.4---m--
P.,,A.„%,. . 1,/,,,„„ 1.4,,,„, (i6si Mt. L'Ac,_ ,' 4-?kri HA 277o5
.e„ 4ia - & p, 0, A. Al e .2 7$.5-/v
r �
—
erre 1%r.1/A cici' I6- 6
o- e e.0 a lc` C .rbcw. t 7'S'o �e/0 1j4:,4 v, - ai &er /3-6 The UY(y& Ca rr6ao VC V-T 5% s
0000. JaU - ePlot/ L.$iC.$ Rt- 1 a lS II-8 C-ayYL! u
A), c• 2 S /Q
Vzt-tTM""d' 21O LApseel 7)). 6(4. A,.)( 2i i CI 11 ecstry
uRIAN (303 Wi Icvtioc i c ?. C cpe.1 1-1i 11 t NSc, a.-75)1
s. .:A, Y LetkrtKlccglk 21 q vo koViOikA c1- ic, 1,X) 2"
serbihiee ?A goX ''t.. tfibte, a71"7
�, r li/I /66 43 fit! AN?ben) P2757 t
It- • !Oc to kAd it, 44,1,1441 Pc
-! cOb I Pfv ier RP. ecl ° . ki I)N C. 01+751(
-
To the Commissioners of Orange County:
We, the concerned citizens of Orange County, are united in opposition
to your proposed regional airport.
Name Address ^ Phone
a., _ /1:.. - / L,/ 'O2 '/-/L.i/ e S-4-212096'
//, d — / / (/// J ,2"-?"9, ),Y
.,, a Aio_ 4......,,,,„:, ii i.,_JAIS 1J_ i /.2.1 , 6,2.1
4..:.. I 91 . ,1I'0/77
St./A Seer-- 20► C2,,X,_, V. (14A44-1,4-0 133-6 3 2 3
m ( ( 10 P. 0,0p if0,4 V' O 5 .))
fie. 5 2a3 tk 51044, sr/ wtn. C oPtt.\ *11 Nc. Icit4 ?c
-..-..e... ..e...A.1,41C "...,./ ..ii Ar.../.11.. IP 07 ' // 4FI/_, ' if , / Az.
/ic../ . ... a... wit 49. e, g0
t.-- /1/n <5•9 md►d/ cir. 9�e�_/ 7e-
�' 4 M) . FeNA all--ik ewes. 13-5-.15-1-11
oti g. , gob tee. Rd twZ3 Q A,, 5(41-3&3s-
,
P , , _ N -z-- v7 5s
-4""v _ P ,, toe , �'r t ee,A Gt` C_ C l r6C• e 4/ Z. " A�
r z
1 4//:.,._ ..,0•''' a/ - ' /?0,4"gasteselleeZIL.
16 iA, 42-. P-a001c/ 33 rli+a. l wc u, Mg_. ..,Z7s7'I
j 1J _. pi Card ST - . A e07,5'!n
I�.ca`"S f L - �, Ate_ .2,72.•tr
JAL., ', ' i/ [.r It i
Car ., % C 144 w.C.
1 „ i►M-r te r! �► _ 172 ' /feC
C+7J! �A i• w`74411-
�J • A .C►_"...
,
•
TO THE COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE COUNTY
WE THE CONCERNED CITIZENS OF ORANGE COUNTY ARE UNITED IN
OPPOSITION TO YOUR PROPOSED REGIONAL AIRPORT
Name Address Phone
&reboot-19 d�nn" '�Z!l�h�-�`Q4.U C��J� ) i��r%,
c,�, 0- ?'
4,La. tot � �cv-N OJAW Ni11, q`►) 37,
.141-e6h144t- ,-nom tic:2/4 tgad-lam.. '(4.iye/ // /vC 9.31/Sly
to-h t3aa��-► �� ckAft.` t 133 - Moo
•
M
. ' .
...z •
,.. - .
PLEASE PRINT SO THAT YOUR NAME WILL BE SPELLED CORRECTLY IN THE
TRANSCRIPT
1 Xvi-E--ct tri e 5 Lerrrt-41...C_ V
‘44-Zifik Peek /
A. X.)(.2Win 1-1,0-1.4±,? r 7
4f1)-R-VNID MA-Q1A1N V .
V 5 cceztr R L VIAthigs R 0 to L CAA . 5A,t( 4.0Ain , /
'17• )134.-Q-'-)4, 3,14..,,,. )-- ,,k„ /
.4111710 ,
8 .r.--7,4:=Nam p-ily, r
(5 1;'
• 5A ti-C-1.-r 17-0 1(4-4-i6,e . .
11. A&0.) le../ti /id 1
. Pao, d_t_ rt- ,-, I
c_E--/ P I )
\14.1. Rcinctill Poy / hr pron., ( oor res3
4• AZ th4)7) 1/4".f C. 6;17T
15.
16.
17. -
18.
19.
20.
21.
•
22.
23.
24.
25.
- 1
- - -
5# 1 u t'1 f S j Vl f 1)11 4+ +1 i5/ 4. .. o ...,.
...„..,...,,,■-4„.. TO rn, rn c.DevAis // gt,..yr,
19
fh, • SMi Orr), , / i 6 6- Fa-es P c-2> A5
vir?
Twig' s it-ti/ -/� a - -- i'" --
-
c"7;07) .5.E 4 i Patti _ ,e0"` 1 wE D v , i.---(2..zic... -----;--4'. ."---._ ,---- .6-� - -
.._.a.........___. ..,7 e-
.- ---16".
-.- . "_ _ . "" . I .p-- . .,r cam. - et: .>"#_
9
,,,...,,,,. xidriVi?. 7-
i1//'-) _- — ee le,-,-;_. _
r.. -_
r _
I—,,..-.' --- 0 ciAdeE, 1 .
1
1 .
-
- S.0. c 116* -,-- g oc. -./4-4'.. '6__. .,:-zP.:2_,__ ..., Zir........),7.
<;:t3. ..i.:. • '. - v-g—Cc----_:"4._
Ndr,�,�,�-Cry- .+...-.....N. ..r .z.• •■ ...... .. - - -
V.
... Ri.„ .4;0444. . eza.....„. _ . . . . .. . . _ . . _ _ .
. .iz.... • ---,,
_ ._. .4.-_.-- _./...; • •
. ft_ ..) .
_ •• _ _ _.c.::::'t...,00/- . ._ . . . . . _ . . .
•
....... •• • _ . . .__ • • • . .. . ...... --- ._..-. . . _ .. -- ---- -. . .
1
1 .._ ... ... . ,....,-7-----,,.‹7 ---3 .....:/-
0.
...g:rot ,:ii,z., „Aem ......_____ _ .. .
• */^7''di2 rieti/J ___ - . OMA,//
.._-_. a �_- —c
. ._ _ _ . ._ _ . .. 7-*Z::: Z t. • . ..
�.cc 2 v -
---
- ---- - - - - - - - - -
„ .... .ct.... .. ..._ ..__.
L....L._ ..__. .. _ . ... . -
4
- . •
- . - . .r_
....,‘„,e, .,.. 0„ .,......,..,,,,..,
. _
,/,,,, . . . _,......,......)
... .. __.
. . . . ._ .
.....
_ ...,.. _ _. . . . . . .
...._._._ . _ .
..
,. /..._.. • ,
_. .
._
. .
. .. _
. . .. PA:P._ -
_ . . .. ._ __
. . _._
. ,
. . . .. . .._._ _. . . . _ . .. _ . _ . .. . _...
. _.__ _ . .__ . _. __ _ . . ._ . . . . . . ._ .. ... . . _ . .
__ _ _ . . . ._ _. .. .
. . . .. ... . ....
_ _. . .. .. . . . . . ___ . . .. _
_ . _ . . _ . ._ . ... . ..._._.
_ __.. _ _ .. . _ . . . . . . . . . .._ . _..... . . .._ __ _.... ._. _ .
. ._ . . ._. ... .. . . . . . .. _ ...
.__ __ . .. . . ._ . . _ _.
. . . _ .. _
_ .._. .. _ _.... . ...... .. _.. . . . . . . . . _. . . ..
_ . .._ _ _ ._ . .. _. .. . .. . _ . . . . _ . . _ .
. _. .. .. . . _. . . ._ ..... . _ .. . . ._ . . _.. . . .. .
__ _ .. __ _ _ . ._ ._ _ . _ _ . . .. . . .. _ . .._ . .
. . .. __... .. ._ .._ . . . _. . _ . . _ . . ..
___ . ._. _ _ _. . ...... _ . __. ....... . _ ... . . _ . . . .
.. . . _ _. _ ... . _ . . . _ _ ._ ._ _ .. . .
. .. . . ... . _._ .. .. ..... . _. _. _ _ . . .
. . _ ..
. . _ . _ ___ . . . .. __ .. . _ . . _ .. . . . . .
..._ _ . . _ .. _ ___ _ . . .. _.. . _._. . . _ . _
._ . .._ . ... ____ _ _ . _. . . ..
.. . . .
._ . _ __ . _... _ .. _ .. .. _ ._ . . . . . . . .. _ . __ .
_. . .. .. _ ___ . . .. . . ._ ._ .. _ . . . .._ _____ _.._ . . _
..._ .... . _ . . . _. _ . . ... _ __ . . . .__ . .. . .. . . _. ._.. _ .. ..__ ..
._ . _. . . . . .. . _ _ _ .. _ _
. _ _
_ _._ . _ .. . _ .. . .. . . .
. __ . . .. _ ..
i . ,
. . ... .... _. .. . . ._.. _ . ..... .. _ .. ...._ .
. . . _ . _ ._ ._ . . . _ . . _. . . . .
. ._. . . _ __ __... . . . . _ ._ . . _. . ._ .... _ . . __. _._. __
_ _ . . __. . ....._ .. _. ._. . . . . _ ... _ . . __.
.. ._.._ . ...._ ..._ _ . . .
_ . . . .. . . _ __.. _ _ . ,
. _ ._._ . __ _ .. .
. _ .... .. _ . . . . .. _ . . . _
__ _ ._ . _ .. . .. __ . _ . ._. ... __. . . _ . . .
. . . . . ..
. .
_ _ • . . _ ...._ __ _ .
_.. _ ... ._. . . _.... . . .. .. . ... . ._ . ..._ .._ . ... ._.. ._ __ _._. .....
..
. . _ . .. . ._
... _. ..__. . . . .. _ . . ...
.. . _ . . ..... ._._ . . _. _ . ._ . .. . . ... . . . . . _ . . .
ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
306F REVERE ROAD
HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27278
€.71;;11.1•-'e%
4,4 1.
Pe:*
ORANGE COUNTY RURAL CHARACTER STUDY
Orange County's Rural Character Study is an opportunity
for citizens to identify the environmental, aesthetic, and
historic features of the County's rural landscape which are
important to them. As Orange County continues to grow and
develop, the rural character is in danger of being lost. The
Rural Character Study will serve as the basis for a plan to
address growth in a way that maintains those qualities of
rural life deemed important by the citizens of Orange County,
while at the same time respecting the property rights of
landowners who may wish to develop or sell their property.
The Orange County Commissioners have charged the
Planning Department with the responsibility of producing this
study. The study is an outgrowth of the Rural Buffer zoning
district implemented in January, 1987 and the Rural Buffer
Workshop held at the UNC Institute of Government in June,
1987. In order to achieve the objectives of this study, the
entire County will be studied.
To assist in this endeavor, a Rural Character Study
Committee of County citizens from all walks of life has been
appointed. The committee is currently composed of 21
individuals who represent governmental, environmental,
recreational, university, agricultural, community, business,
and development interests in the County. The committee is
chaired by Bill Mainous, recently retired Director of the
Orange County Agricultural Extension Service.
In addition to Mr. Mainous, other members of the Rural
Character Study Committee are Dolly Hunter (Vice Chair) ,
Clint Burklin, Dwight Compton, Dr. Carole Crumley, Dr.
William Dow, Elizabeth Dyer, Judson Edeburn, Dr. Stephen
• Halkiotis, Barry Jacobs, Minerva Kenyon, Livy Luddington, Dr.
Leila Moustafa, Lisa Pakenham, Lorraine Parker, Kirk Pelland,
• Lester Ray, Larry Reid, Bob Strayhorn, David Swanson, and
• Carl Walters.
Nationally recognized planning consultant Lane Kendig,
President of Lane Kendig, Inc. , Mundelein, Illinois, was
selected by the committee to guide the County through the
Planning process. Three consultants were interviewed by the
committee and Mr. Kendig was selected because of his
familiarity with Orange County, his qualifications, and the
-----------
quality of his proposal. His approach ensures citizen
participation. A contract with Mr. Kendig was signed in
August, 1988. Mr. Kendig has considerable experience in
rural planning and has worked extensively in the South,
Midwest, and Northeast. Mr. Kendig's approach is broken
down into three major phases, reconnaissance, issues
resolution, and development of plans and guidelines.
The reconnaissance phase of the study began on November
29, 1988 when Mr. Kendig visited the County for two days.
His visit ended with a public information meeting held in the
Orange County Courthouse on the evening of November 30.
Approximately 300 citizens were in attendance at this
meeting, 25 of whom addressed questions, comments, and/or
concerns to the committee. The reconnaissance phase was
completed with another two day visit by Mr. Kendig on January
24 and 25, 1989. The outgrowth of this phase was the
identification of four goals for the study to focus upon:
agricultural preservation, natural resources protection.,
visual resources protection, and growth management.
Phase two, issues resolution, began with a three day
visit by Mr. Kendig on March 20, 21, and 22 when he
presented issues papers on implementation strategies for the
Rural Character Study (Mr. Kendig's approach calls for an
understanding and commitment to the methods that will be used
to implement the plan before the plan is actually
formulated) . Planning staff conducted a series of meetings
the week of April 24 to enhance public understanding of, the
various implementation, strategies and Mr. Kendig came back
for one final visit on the subject May 15 an 16. He is
tentatively scheduled to return around the end of June to
present recommendations on the implementation techniques to
the Rural Character Study Committee, Orange County Planning
Board, and Orange County Commissioners.
Once some level of agreement is reached on possible
implementation techniques, Mr. Kendig will begin the
development of plans and guidelines. He plans to return in
late summer with drafts of these. Following a series of
public information meetings, a public hearing will be
scheduled in the fall. Following the public hearing, the
Rural Character Study Committee and Orange County Planning
• Board will make recommendations on the study which will be
forwarded to the County Commissioners for final disposition.
To date, much valuable public input has been received.
The Rural Character Study Committee would like to encourage
continued citizen participation to ensure a successful and
productive study that will accurately convey the concerns of
the people of Orange County. For further information,
contact Gene Bell or Emily Crudup in the Planning Department
at 732-8181, 967-9251, 227-2031, or 688-7331, extension 565
or 574.