Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 10-14-1993 - C 1 (JOINT PLANNING HEARING) s 0 G � ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agenda Item No. ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date : October 14 , 1993 SUBJECT: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS ) DEPARTMENT: Housing/Comm. Dev. PUBLIC HEARING YES: x NO: ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: Tara L. Fikes Draft CHAS x 2490 TELEPHONE NUMBER- Hillsborough - 732-8181 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 Mebane - 227-2031 Durham - 688-7331 PURPOSE: To receive citizen comments regarding the draft Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy for Orange County. BACKGROUND: The Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS ) is a five year comprehensive planning document that identifies the overall housing needs in the County and outlines a five-year strategy as well as a one year plan to address those needs. The CHAS is a planning document which guides future planning and implementation of housing programs in Orange County; It is not an application for -funding, nor does it commit any local funds for housing programs . Any jurisdiction participating in the Federal -Community Development Block Grant Program (Chapel Hill) and/or _-_the Federal HOME Investment Partnership Program (Orange County including the Towns) must have an approved CHAS. In 1992 , a "Consolidated" CHAS covering the County and the Towns of Carrboro, Chapel Hill and Hillsborough was approved by the U'.S. Department. of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) . This -year, - due -to the availability of 1990 census data, all localities with an approved CHAS must submit an updated five year plan by December 31, 1993. Additionally, local jurisdictions are required -to provide at least two T opportunities for citizen comments during the CHAS development process . The first public hearing should be held -prior -to development of the draft CHAS document. These hearings were held by the four local governments during the month of September with the exception of Carrboro which held their first hearing on October 5, 1993 . The second public hearing should be held after the draft CHAS is prepared but before final approval by the elected bodies and submission to HUD. The draft CHAS has been prepared and this public hearing provides the necessary opportunity for public comment regarding this document. In addition, local staff is also interested in receiving information regarding future plans of local non-profit housing/human service organizations in order to include these activities in the County's overall strategy. oozy There is also a thirty day comment period, October 15 , 1993 through November 15, 1993, during which time local planning/housing staff will continue to receive citizen input. At the end of this period, the final CHAS document must be approved by all elected governing boards prior to December 31, 1993 in order to meet the submission deadline. RECOMMENDATION(S) : Receive all comments as additional information to be incorporated into the Final Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy for Orange County. 003 COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING AFFORDABILITY STRATEGY FOR ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Including the Towns of Chapel Hill, Carrboro, and Hillsborough December 1993 5A ir For more information, contact - Tara Fikes, Orange County Housing and Community Development, P.O. Box 8181, Hillsborough, North Carolina, 27278, 919-732-8181, ext. 2490. 004 COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING AFFORDABILITY STRATEGY FOR ORANGE COUNTY Including the Towns of Chapel Hill, Carrboro, and Hillsborough INTRODUCTION The affordable housing needs of Orange County have been studied from many points of view and reported in these documents: Orange County Low and Moderate Income Housing Task Force Report (September, 1987 ) , Public Private Partnership Affordable Housing Task Force (May, 1989) , Chapel Hill Comprehensive Plan (June, 1989) , and Carrboro Housing Report (May, 1990) . Additionally, the Public Private Partnership has sponsored two Housing Summits entitled "Why Housing Costs So Much" on October 29, 1992 and May 5, 1993 to challenge the community to participate in helping solve Orange County' s affordable housing needs. These reports as well as summit proceedings serve as the basis for this Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) . The important issues in Orange County have not changed. The high cost of homeownership has left many families out of the housing market or sent them to surrounding counties to buy homes and commute into Orange County for work. The rental market, inflated by the ability of UNC-CH students able to pay higher rents, is beyond the means of families with incomes below 50% of the area median. For families in need of three or more bedrooms, very little housing stock exists. The number of women and children staying at the homeless shelter continues to increase dramatically, and transition from the shelter into permanent housing in Orange County is nearly impossible since no transitional housing exists. Housing for special interest groups such as the elderly, persons that are developmentally disabled, and persons with alcohol or drug addiction, is limited in Orange County. In this CHAS, staff from Orange County, Chapel Hill, Carrboro, and Hillsborough have identified the specific needs of the county and prioritized them based on severity of need and availability of resources to address the need. Section I, Community Profile, is a description of the housing needs and market in Orange County. Section II, is the Five- Year Strategy to address these needs. Section III is the Annual Plan which describes actions to be taken during the Federal fiscal year, October 1, 1993 through September 30, 1994 . SUMMARY OF CHAS DEVELOPMENT AND CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PROCESS Development of this county-wide CHAS was undertaken by a staff working group that included a representative from each participating jurisdiction. This working group began work on a draft CHAS in early June, 1993. The CHAS was first announced to the public in the Chapel Hill Herald on Friday, August 27, 1993, and again on Sunday, September 5, 1993. The advertisement briefly explained the CHAS and listed the location, dates, and times of the public hearings for all four jurisdictions. In addition to the i1 advertisement in the newspaper, approximately 350 housing providers and advocates for all housing interest groups received a personal announcement in order to increase attendance and comments at the hearings. The first public hearings provided the opportunity to present the CHAS requirements to the elected officials and receive citizen comments. The Orange County Board of Commissioners held a public hearing on September 7 , 1993; Hillsborough Town Board held a public hearing on September 14, 1993; Chapel Hill Town Council held a public hearing on September 20, 1993; and Carrboro Board of Aldermen held a public hearing on October 5, 1993. There were no comments received at the Hillsborough or Orange County hearings, however, citizen comments were received at the Carrboro and Chapel Hill hearings. A summary of those comments are included in the Attachment Section of this document. In addition, a joint public hearing was held on October 14 , 1993 to review the proposed CHAS. This hearing was also publicized in the local newspaper. The notice included information regarding where citizens could review the proposed document prior to attending the joint hearing. The public comment period began on October 15, 1993 and ended when each local jurisdiction approved the submission of the CHAS as follows: Chapel Hill, ; Orange County, ; Hillsborough, ; Carrboro, The plan that follows is the result of this process. 2 1 . 0,Q) PROFILE a. MARKET AND INVENTORY CHARACTERISTICS 1. Community Description i. Background. Historically, a variety of housing opportunities have been available in Orange County to meet the needs of a diverse population. This diversity has been expressed in housing sizes and styles, however, in recent years, this diversity has been threatened due to the diminishing availability of housing for very low-, low-, and moderate-income residents. The median income for a family of four in Orange County is $40 , 685 while the median value of a home is $101 ,500 . Because of this imbalance, the majority of residents cannot afford to buy a home within the County limits. The availability of basic rental units is also a major concern of Orange County residents, especially in the Chapel Hill/Carrboro area. Many University of North Carolina (UNC) students have the financial means to compete with area very low- and low- income households for the least expensive housing. In Northern Orange County, the sheer availability of rental units poses a problem for lower income residents. Further, the size of rental units is also a major concern. The scarcity of large size rental units (three bedrooms or more) in Orange County makes it difficult for the average family of four to find housing to suit their needs and thus, are forced to live elsewhere. ii. Demographics. The 1990 Census reports that Orange County has a population of 92 ,572 residents. The racial composition of the County has remained fairly consistent since 1980; in 1990, the composition was as follows: the White population was 81% of the population; African Americans were 16% of the population; all races of Hispanic origin were 1% of the population; Native Americans accounted for .2% of the population; and the Asian and Pacific Islanders, and all other populations made up less than 1% of the population. Although the Asian and Pacific Islander population constitutes a small portion of Orange County, this population increased 231%, growing from 710 to 2 ,352 between 1980 and 1990. Chapel Hill also experienced little change in its racial composition since 1980. However, as in Orange County, Chapel Hill experienced a surge in the Asian population of 247% increasing from 484 people to 1,678 people. Approximately 71% of Orange County' s new Asian population reside in Chapel Hill. Race and Income. According to 1990 Census data, 27% (9, 932 ) of all households in Orange County are considered very low- income, earning between 0 - 50% of the median family income ( $20, 343 or less) . With the exception of the White population, the majority of the population of each of the racial groups are considered very low-income, ranging from 37% of the Native American population to 44% of the African American population. 3 ` J LJ t� J J L 2. Market and Inventory Conditions 0 0 7 i. General Market and Inventory Housinq_ Conditions Although data are not readily available for current estimates of housing assistance needs of low- and moderate-income households, recent reports from the Town of Chapel Hill Comprehensive Plan, the Orange County Low and Moderate Income Housing Task Force, and the Hillsborough and Carrboro Planning Department summarize the market conditions in Orange County clearly. Generally, the cost of obtaining housing in the County has risen significantly faster than incomes of families seeking housing in the market. Rental Housing According to the 1990 Census, rental units represent 42% of the county-wide housing market. In the southern part of the County, the rental market has been inflated by the large number of University of North Carolina students who compete with very low- and low-income families for the lowest cost housing. Because students can live in groups and combine their resources, they are willing and able to pay more for rental units than very low- and low-income families. The Census also reports that approximately 57% of those rental households spent more than 35% of their income on rent. In the 1980 ' s, Orange County experienced a surge in the construction of multi-family units. Between 1980 and 1986 in Chapel Hill, 75% of all building permits issued were for multi- family developments, and by 1990, multi-family units were 79% of Chapel Hill ' s total housing stock. In order to afford Chapel Hill' s average 3-bedroom rent in 1993 of $550, a family of four would have to earn at least $25, 000, or about 63% of the area median family income.' Very low-income families (below 50% of the area median) cannot even afford the 1993 average 2-bedroom rent of $475. In 1990, 70% of Carrboro' s total housing stock was multi- family rental units, concentrated in 14 major apartment complexes. The average 2-bedroom rent was $455, and only affordable to a family with an annual income of $22 ,200. As in Chapel Hill, the neighboring Town of Carrboro has very few 3-bedroom or larger rental units. In addition to high market rents, very few apartment complexes 1 Affordable Rent calculated using the following methodology: Monthly Rent + Estimated Utilities ($100) = Total Housing Payment. Total Housing Payment/30% (Housing Ratio) = Monthly Income Required. Monthly Income Required X 12 = Annual Income Required. 4 have units with amenities for families with small children. One- and two-bedroom units comprise the majority of multi-family rental units in Orange County, and in fact, families have difficulty locating three bedroom or larger units even with a Section 8 voucher or certificate to make their rents affordable. Another gap in the rental market is the availability of single-room occupancy situations. No boarding houses or rooming houses exist in Orange County to provide transition from the homeless shelter or short-term housing for other special needs groups, such as battered women or persons recovering from substance abuse. As of August 1993, the Town of Chapel Hill reports 49 substandard units, the majority of which are in the Pine Knolls neighborhood. The determination of substandard units is based on a combination of inspections completed by Chapel Hill Building Inspectors, and by a windshield survey completed by the Chapel Hill Planning Department. The majority of units classified as substandard were found to have dilapidated roofs, or have been condemned by the Chapel Hill Inspections Department. County-wide, the 1990 Census reported 10% of all housing units as substandard, or 3, 610 units. Of these, only two (2) percent are considered not suitable for rehabilitation due to their extent of deterioration. Over one-third of all dwelling units in Orange County are more than thirty years old, but many of the rental units in the market have been built since 1960. Future production of rental housing that meets the needs of low-income families will be limited in southern Orange County by the availability of land that can be acquired at a price that will support the construction of affordable rental units. Within the urban services boundary for which public utilities are available or can be extended, very few parcels exist, and for those vacant parcels, the highest and best use is not low-income rental units. In addition, cost of development in southern Orange County is the highest in the Triangle, including the cost of meeting public policies that are intended to increase the quality of life. Even if Low Income Housing Tax Credits are used, units cannot be built and rented for affordable rents without some subsidized source of mortgage financing for at least a portion of the project costs. Further, with the large student population the market is more supportive of production of one- and two-bedroom units, rather than three-bedroom units needed by four-person families. Recent efforts by the Town of Chapel Hill to locate a suitable site for 24 new public housing units point to the limited available land in southern Orange County. After an extensive search, the site finally selected on Highway 86 north of Town required additional public investment in off-site utility extensions. These costs were not paid from the funds allocated by HUD to construct 5 1 y = 009 the public housing, and had to be paid from other Town sources. A Low Income Housing Tax Credit project would be difficult to develop with high off-site costs of utility extensions without substantial local subsidy to complement the Tax Credits . Availability of land and utility capacity does limit future production of affordable rental housing in northern Orange County; however, such development may be furthered limited by the over 100 units of rental housing currently proposed to be built using Low Income Housing Tax Credits. Until those units are completed and occupied, additional construction of rental housing will be deterred by market absorption. However, the majority of those units will be 2-bedroom, furthering the need for appropriate sized housing for larger families. Also, the proposed units will be affordable to low-income families, but the need for rental units for very low-income families is still unmet in the northern Orange County market area. No loss of assisted rental stock is anticipated in Orange County within the next five years. Homeownership Market. Orange County has the highest cost of new housing development in North Carolina. The average new home sales price in 1991 was $143,577 . To afford this new home, a family would have to earn in excess of $60, 000, or nearly 160% of the area median income. In Chapel Hill, the 1991 average new single-family home sales price was $165,082, which could be purchased by a family with an income of at least $68,000 . Among cities statewide, the average new home sales price is $125, 500. Single-family houses in the Chapel Hill/Orange County market at $90,000 or below are fairly scarce. A family at 80% of the area median, or $32 ,548, can afford a mortgage payment of approximately $650, or a mortgage of about $75,000. Even with a large down payment, the available housing in Chapel Hill and Carrboro is beyond the reach of low-income families. Homeownership assistance efforts undertaken by the Town of Chapel Hill have resulted in housing being developed that is affordable to families with 70% to 80% of the area median income, with second mortgages from the Town, assistance from the County, and special first mortgages from the N.C. Housing Finance Agency. With such high costs of development, producing new homeownership opportunities will be impossible without assistance from local governments. In addition to new construction, existing low-income homeowners continue to need assistance in order to rehabilitate and maintain their homes. The Census estimates that 38% ( 14 , 910) of the housing stock in Orange County is over thirty years old, and many of those units are owned by low- and fixed-income individuals who cannot afford rehabilitation. Particularly in Carrboro, and the Northside and Pine Knolls neighborhoods in Chapel Hill, and certain parts of rural Orange County, rehabilitation is a viable 6 010 - - option for both maintaining homeowners in their homes and converting rental properties into homeownership opportunities . Some new homeownership opportunities under $90, 000 are available in Carrboro and Hillsborough; however, many are two- bedroom units and therefore not suitable for a family of four. More recent development proposals in Carrboro and Hillsborough have been for housing units at prices above $100,000 . Orange County Habitat for Humanity has an aggressive construction program, with a new subdivision underway that will eventually house 35 families. The Habitat model has been very successful in Orange County, and continued support of Habitat for Humanity will be important to meet the need for homeownership opportunities for very low-income families. One important concern about housing market pressure in Chapel Hill is the loss of black homeownership, particularly in the Northside and Pine Knolls neighborhoods . Pressure from student- driven investors has driven up the prices of homes in the traditional black communities in Chapel Hill, preventing other low- and moderate-income black families from purchasing homes in the communities. The units are sold to investors, often through an estate sale, and rented to students. This market phenomenon has resulted in the reduction of black land ownership and neighborhoods in Chapel Hill. Mobile Homes and Manufactured Housing. Another source of affordable housing in Orange County is mobile homes, constituting 12% of the County' s total housing stock in 1990 . While mobile homes do not appreciate in the same way as conventional homes and in many cases the homeowner does not own the land underneath a mobile home, it may be the most affordable option for some families . Very few standards exist for mobile home parks, and the Orange County Low and Moderate Income Housing Task Force Report stresses the need for some guidance for park owners to protect mobile home owners who often cannot afford to move their home. Manufactured housing, which is conventional-style housing constructed in a factory and delivered to the site, is another affordable alternative. Recent improvements in construction technology have created a product similar in quality to a house constructed on-site, with features that result in affordable prices. One issue regarding manufactured housing is confusion around definitions and quality. Any manufactured housing built after 1976 must meet specific Federal guidelines regarding construction and safety standards. Traditional perceptions of mobile homes must change to meet the changing quality standards now required. Many manufactured homes are indistinguishable from site-built houses, and can provide quality affordable housing options in Orange 7 L_ _ _011 - County. Local development regulations should be sensitive to permitting manufactured housing as an option for developers and builders who are trying to provide affordable opportunities. Public Improvements. In southern Orange County, vacant land served by public utilities is very limited. With supply limited, the price of land with water and sewer service is too high for the development of affordable housing. Subsidies for extension of services into less expensive land or for purchasing land with the service area will be needed for successful housing development activities in Chapel Hill and Carrboro. In unincorporated Orange County, while land accessible to urban services is available, many existing residences lack adequate plumbing facilities . Actual data regarding the number of outdoor privies in the County are not available, the 1990 Census estimates that there are approximately 297 units without indoor bathrooms . Further, a 1989 report from the N.C. Rural Economic Development Center reports an estimated 1,052 units without indoor plumbing. Local staff considers the latter estimate to be the best approximation of the problem. Further, an estimated 10 - 20% of the County' s septic systems are failing at any given moment. A county- wide housing strategy must address the need for attention to water and sewer problems of individuals in rural settings without access to public water systems. Transportation. While the public transportation system in the Chapel Hill-Carrboro urban area is comprehensive, access to jobs and facilities outside the urban area is limited by lack of transportation. The homeless shelter, located in Chapel Hill, serves the entire County, yet no public transportation is available from Chapel Hill to northern Orange County for persons with employment or families located there. The battered women' s shelter is located in Durham, without adequate inter-city transportation to give women access to jobs, schools and other support systems in Orange County. Some human services transportation is provided to give low-income persons access to health care. For these and other special needs groups, transportation will continue to be a barrier to solving their housing problems. In other ways, private and public transportation has been used as a solution to housing issues in southern Orange County. Large numbers of individuals commute to Chapel Hill from adjacent counties (Durham, Chatham, Alamance, Person) to work at UNC or Memorial Hospital, either through personal vehicles or employer- sponsored transportation. The resulting traffic problems on major transportation arteries into Chapel Hill from the south and east have created a community-wide concern. Lead Based Paint Hazards. Although the use of lead based paint declined in the 1950 ' s, lead was not banned from residential paint until 1978, and is still available for military, industrial, 8 012 .. and marine use and can sometimes end up being used in homes. The risk of lead based paint contamination is highest in homes built before 1979, for children under 6, and for pregnant women. HUD estimates that there are approximately 11,253 very low- and low- income housing units in Orange County, the majority built between 1960 and 1979, that are contaminated with lead based paint ( 6,897 rental units, 4, 356 owner-occupied units) . There is a county-wide demand for approximately 2 ,437 lead safe units .2 In Chapel Hill, there are an estimated 4 , 026 very low- and low-income units contaminated with lead based paint (5,054 renter occupied and 813 owner occupied units). As in Orange County, the majority were built between 1960 and 1979 . Chapel Hill has a demand for 737 lead safe units. According to the Orange County Health Department, one case of lead based paint poisoning has been reported in Orange County in 1993, and there are 10 other children that have tested for borderline to low lead based paint poisoning. All children who receive medical treatment from the Well Child Clinic between ages 1 and 6 are tested for exposure to the health threatening substance. ii. Assisted Housing Inventory. A. Public Housing Currently, there are 312 units of assisted housing in Chapel Hill. These are the only conventional public housing units in Orange County. As of June 30, 1993, 11 of these units were vacant, 10 of which are due to rehabilitation. The majority of Chapel Hill ' s 312 assisted housing units are two bedroom units. The various locations of units throughout Town eliminates isolation of public housing residents from the remainder of the community. The 3% vacancy rate in Chapel Hill ' s public housing units is equal to HUD' s acceptability rate. The number of units, bedroom distribution, and vacancy is given in the table below. 2 The formula for the demand for lead based paint: Number of households with children under 6 + number of homes licensed for child care = demand for lead safe units. 9 (?i 3` J Number of Bedrooms Location # of Units 1 2 3 4 5 5+ Vacant Craig/Gomains 40 16 16 6 2 1 Sts. Lindsey Street 9 4 5 0 North Columbia 11 5 6 0 St. Trinity Court 40 20 20 0 Ridgefield 44 9 12 13 10 0 South Roberson 15 12 3 0 St. Airport Gardens 26 10 16 1 Pritchard Park 15 4 5 6 1 Colony Woods 30 5 21 4 0 West Eastwood 32 24 8 1 Caldwell Street 20 10 10 1 Oakwood 30 20 10 0 TOTAL 312 27 131 113 29 12 0 5 This year, the Chapel Hill Department of Housing and Community Development completed a Comprehensive Plan focusing specifically on public housing issues. This plan includes an Annual Plan, a Five Year Plan, a detailed examination of each public housing site, and prioritizes all renovations. Because it is in the poorest condition of the 12 locations, the Ridgefield complex will be the first to undergo major rehabilitation and modernization. For the majority of the public housing locations, the most critical renovations are lead based paint abatement, and accessibility improvement. The accessibility improvements are of extreme importance in units with elderly residents and among other improvements, includes the addition of grab bars to bathroom units . This Comprehensive Plan also addresses concerns raised by public housing residents and management. Among the top priorities of residents are: ( 1 ) to establish a new program or improve the 10 014 existing program to help public housing residents achieve economic independence and self sufficiency; and (2 ) to establish a training and counseling program for homeowners. At this time, there are no plans to eliminate any units from the public housing inventory. B. Section 8 PROGRAM # OF UNITS Section 8 Existing Certificates 403 Section 8 Existing Vouchers 101 Section 8 Moderate Rehab 97 Section 8 New Construction 90 C. Other PROGRAM # OF UNITS Farmers Home 515 Program 81 HUD Loan Management Program 26 Section 236 53 iii. Inventory of Facilities and Services for Homeless Persons. The Inter-Faith Council (IFC) operates the homeless shelter serving the entire County. The facility has been rehabilitated and operated with funds from many sources, including private fund-raising, HUD funds under the McKinney Act for homeless assistance and other HUD funds through the Towns of Chapel Hill and Carrboro and Orange County, and energy funds from the N.C. Housing Finance Agency, rent and utilities from the Town of Chapel Hill, and contributions from other local governments. The IFC Shelter has a total overnight sleeping capacity of 32 men and 18 women, and operates at capacity most nights. The projected total shelter visitors for 1993 is expected to be 950 adults and 95 children. The Shelter also offers a Community Kitchen providing meals to anyone in need. No other overnight shelter for homeless persons exists in the County. Both IFC and Orange Congregations in Mission (OCIM) operate emergency programs that offer financial assistance for rent, rent deposits, utilities, food, or other necessities to families in imminent risk of homelessness. iv. Inventory of Supportive Housing for Non-Homeless Persons with Special Needs. An inventory of the few residential facilities and services for populations with other special needs reflects the community' s non-institutional approach to housing for these populations. A current review of existing facilities reveals that the limited, inadequate housing options for persons with special needs cannot offer the degree of care consider by human services 11 __©1, - providers to be important to the success of counseling and assistance programs. For developmentally disabled, handicapped, and mentally ill persons, the major housing provider is Residential Services, Incorporated, operating 7 group homes and one apartment complex in Chapel Hill. There are currently no Independent Living Facilities for persons who do not need close supervision but would benefit from a structured living situation. The Mental Health Association in Orange County has received a grant award from HUD in conjunction with the Mental Health Association in North Carolina to build 14 units of supported independent living units for persons with mental illness in Chapel Hill. The Orange County Mental Health Association indicates that there are approximately 35 persons with chronic mental illness in Orange County who have immediate needs for affordable housing. The only facility specifically for battered women is located in Durham and sponsored by the Durham - Orange Coalition for Battered Women. The Durham location creates a transportation problem for most women with school-age children, and dislocates battered women from their support networks. The AIDS Services Agency of Orange County is working to provide both host homes for persons with AIDS in need of out-patient treatment at Memorial Hospital and a group home-type facility for long-term residents with AIDS. For persons recovering from substance abuse, Freedom House is the only halfway house for women in Orange County; there are no facilities available for men. A private home for pregnant teenagers also exists in Chapel Hill. Very low- and low-income elderly persons in Orange County may choose to live in Adelaide Walters Apartments in Chapel Hill, the only assisted housing specifically for elderly residents. The 1990 Census report estimated that there are 6,430 persons over age 62 receiving Social Security income in Orange County. There are also three nursing homes, five rest homes and 11 family care homes in Orange County. A significant number of the public housing population and Section 8 certificate-holders are also reserved for the elderly. Many older adults would be able to "age in place" by maintaining their home environment, if resources were available to provide home maintenance and repair and simple support services like transportation and meals. Additional rental opportunities would complement efforts to allow older adults to "age in place" by making assisted living situations available if staying at home is no longer possible. 12 016 b. NEEDS ASSESSMENT 1. Current Estimates and Five Year Projections. i. Very Low-Income. There are a total of 9, 932 very low-income households in Orange County earning from 0 to 50% of the area median family income ($0 - $20,343) . Very low-income renters are often forced to live in substandard housing due to the lack of affordable housing options in Orange County. Approximately 86% of households in the very low-income group reported having some housing problems.' An estimated 97% of large families in Orange County, and 91% in Chapel Hill experienced housing problems which can be attributed to the fact that many large, very low-income households, cannot afford the rental prices for an adequately sized unit, and are therefore forced to live in an overcrowded, substandard unit. An estimated 83% of Orange County renters, and 86% of Chapel Hill renters have a cost burden greater than 30%.4 Of the total 3,409 and 510 very low-income, owner occupied units in Orange County and Chapel Hill, 61% (2, 065) in Orange County and 71% (360) in Chapel Hill experience some housing problems. Owner occupied units are labeled elderly or "other" households, and 88% ( 205) of other types of households experience housing problems in Chapel Hill. Owner occupied units occupied by "other" types of households have many more residents with cost burdens greater than 30% and 50% (88% and 58% in Orange County and Chapel Hill respectively) . This is a direct result of the high cost of housing in Chapel Hill. Many of these residents are forced to spend the majority of their income on housing. For the purpose of this CHAS, a jurisdiction has a housing need if more than 30% of income is spent on housing. Utilizing this definition, there is a housing need for 12, 012 Orange County households and 5, 189 Chapel Hill households. ii. Other Low-Income. The Other Low-Income group consists of 7 , 070 households that earn between 51% and 80% of the area median income ( $20,749 to $32,548) . Approximately 36% of other low-income renters in Orange County, and 43% in Chapel Hill experience housing problems . Only 62 (2%) County residents and 38 (2%) Chapel Hill renters have a cost burden greater than 50%. Cost burdens for 3 A housing problem is defined as a household living in a unit: (1) which meets the definitions of physical defects, (2) that meets the definition of overcrowded, and (3) meet the definition of a cost burden greater than 30% of gross income. 4 Cost burden indicates the amount of gross income spent on housing including utilities. 13 017 owner occupied units are also fairly low (6% Orange County, 14% in Chapel Hill) . There is a total housing need for 2, 360 households in Orange County, and 1, 180 in Chapel Hill for households that earn between 51% and 80% of the median income. iii. Moderate Income. In Orange County and Chapel Hill, renter and owner occupied, moderate income households earning between 81% and 95% of the median income (between $32,954 to $38, 650) have very little housing problems and have fairly low cost burdens . There are only 84 ( 6%) renter households with any housing problems in Orange County, and 63 (8%) in Chapel Hill. Housing problems and cost burdens for elderly households dropped significantly from renter to owner occupied households, with no elderly household with a cost burden greater than 50% of their income. Of total households in both categories, more owner occupied households experience housing problems and cost burdens greater than 30% and 50% of income. As with the rented units, there are few owner occupied units with cost burdens greater than 50% of gross income. Approximately 429 households in Orange County and 210 households in Chapel Hill have a housing need. Residents in this income group have more housing options available to them due to their financial status. Unlike very low- and other low-income households, more moderate-income households are able to find housing units that suit all of their needs (space, size, location etc. ) within their financial means. As stated many times in this CHAS, Chapel Hill has a great need for housing. Roughly 38% of all County residents that earn between 0 and 95% of the median family income live in Chapel Hill. Although only 28% of total Orange County households live in Chapel Hill, 36% of very low-income, 35% of other low income, and 37% of all moderate-income households in Orange County live in Chapel Hill. Orange County' s rental housing stock is dominated by the Town of Chapel Hill where 52% of all renters reside. No information is available for families who meet Federal preferences for rental assistance except to note the waiting lists for existing units. As of July 19, 1993, the combined Section 8 and Public Housing waiting list for Orange County is approximately 1,218 families and individuals. The Town of Chapel Hill recently received funds to construct an additional 24 units of public housing, but this will only serve a small segment of the current waiting list. The public housing waiting list shows very slow turnover, as many families cannot move from public housing into unassisted housing even when they are paying the full fair market rent for public housing units, since units are not available in the private market at rents affordable to very low income families. In addition to public housing and Section 8 units, public-private assisted apartments, such as Adelaide Walters, Elliot Woods, Chase Park, Gateway, and Coachwood also have waiting lists, pointing to the need for additional assisted rental units. In addition, 14 018 - - Residential Services, Inc. , the major provider of assisted housing for developmentally disabled, handicapped, and mentally ill residents also maintains a waiting list of persons with special housing needs. Another serious need in Orange County is that of affordable homeownership opportunities, previously described in the Market and Inventory Conditions section. While some families are experiencing the cost burden associated with homeownership, most very low- and low-income families have not been able to become homeowners in Orange County. A family of four with income of 60% of the area median, or approximately $24, 000, can afford a mortgage payment of approximately $550, which can support .a mortgage of $65, 000 .5 Very few homeownership opportunities exist for such families in Orange County. Five-Year Projections. No formal projections have been made by local governments in Orange County, but over the next five years, rising housing costs will continue to outpace income growth, creating a growing cost burden on low-income families. Nearby rural counties are now absorbing the families that cannot afford to live in Orange County, and as the housing markets in those counties "catches up" with Orange County over the next five years, fewer and fewer opportunities will be available for low-income families. While the Triangle area has experienced very low unemployment and a very stable economy throughout the 1980 ' s, the majority of Orange County employment opportunities are in the service sector, usually lower wage and low skill employment. Recent budget cuts by the state threaten the main employer in the County, the University of North Carolina. At the least, income growth in the service and government sector will not increase and may slow down, as annual cost of living increases are reduced or eliminated. No proportional slowing of real estate appreciation has been experienced in the southern part of Orange County, indicating that the affordability gap will continue to grow, and the number of families paying disproportionate amounts of income for housing will continue to increase. 2. Nature and Extent of Homelessness. i. Needs of the Sheltered and Unsheltered Homeless 5 Mortgage amounts are calculated using the following methodology: Monthly Income X .40 (Total Debt Ratio) = Total Monthly Debt. Total Monthly Debt - Estimated Taxes and Insurance ($125) and Estimated Other Debt ($250 to $350) = Total Available for Mortgage. Assumed Mortgage Term of 30 years and Assumed Interest Rate of 925%. While this methodology is more subject to variation based on Estimated Other Debt, it presents a more realistic view of mortgage qualification, 15 01;) Data on homeless persons in Orange County come directly from the homeless shelter. A recent report from the Inter-Faith Council Homeless Shelter indicates a dramatic increase in the housing needs of homeless persons in Orange County. From January 1 through May 26, 1993, the shelter served 369 people, and operated at capacity almost every night. Approximately 60% of those that stay in the shelter claim housing issues as the premier life occurrence that lead them to homelessness. A substantial number of people in the shelter are persons who came to the Triangle area seeking employment without adequate funds to get re-established. The Inter-Faith Council estimates that nearly $1, 000 is needed to pay all the up-front costs needed to move into a standard rental unit in southern Orange County. A look at the homeless shelter guests has indicated the dramatic increase in the number of women, children, and families housed there. Between 1991 and 1992, the number of women guests increased by 10% and the number of children in the shelter increased by 35%. During this one year span, roughly 35% of the women had stayed in a shelter before, indicating the difficulty women have maintaining their independence once they leave the shelter. With only one homeless facility in the County, meeting the different needs of single men, single women, pregnant women, mothers with infants and small children, and families becomes a difficult task for the shelter staff. No data are available for unsheltered homeless persons who choose not to stay at the IFC Homeless Shelter; however, local officials have observed an increase in rural homelessness even though figures are not currently available. Many of these homeless persons are migrant laborers or new arrivals who have not been able to find work or save enough money to move into permanent housing. ii. Subpopulations Special needs populations, such as persons recovering from substance abuse, persons with AIDS, or persons discharged from hospital care also provide service challenges to the shelter' s current operation. No public or private single-room occupancy facilities exist in Orange County to provide transition for shelter residents who have jobs but still cannot afford to enter the housing market. Boarding houses, rooming houses, or other historic transitional facilities have suffered from economic displacement, as the large residences needed for such operations have been purchased by investors and converted to student housing or purchased by families for private residences. Further, only one halfway house exists for women recovering from substance abuse, and no comparable facilities exist for men, leaving the homeless shelter to serve this population. The battered women' s shelter for Orange and Durham counties is located in Durham, so women who want to maintain their children' s attendance in Chapel Hill-Carrboro Schools have no other option but the homeless shelter. Without facilities for special populations 16 020 or transitional housing opportunities for working residents, the homeless shelter becomes the County' s main source of short-term housing for a broad spectrum of people. iii. Needs of Persons Threatened with Homelessness No statistical data is available regarding the number of persons threatened with homelessness . However, those families paying more than 30% of their income for rent are at constant risk of homelessness. This number is approximately 12, 012 with most families headed by a female. 3 . Populations with Special Needs - Other than Homeless. In Orange County, the special needs population includes the elderly, frail elderly, developmentally disabled, handicapped, mentally ill residents, persons with AIDS, battered women, persons recovering from substance abuse, and homeless teenagers (including teenage mothers) . i. Need for Supportive Housing Each of these groups has different needs which require different types of housing. It is important to note that it is almost impossible to report a 100% accurate count of these sub-populations; the figures only reflect the number of reported cases. In most cases, these groups will need increased support services and case management in order to live independently, even if low-cost housing opportunities are made available to them. Assisted housing opportunities for persons with special needs should provide a continuum of choices that offer transition from supervised housing situations to independent living with minimal support. Coordination of housing assistance with increased funds for case management is critical to programs for persons with special needs if attempts at "mainstreaming" are to be successful. Elderly and Frail Elderly. In the case of the elderly, the opportunity to "age in place" must be provided alongside new housing options, both rental and homeownership. Very low- and low- income older adults are often subject to economic displacement, as they become less able to afford to maintain their family homes . In addition, as they age, older residents need modifications to their homes to make them more accessible, such as ramps, wider doorways, and grab bars. Many older adults continue to live in substandard housing because they cannot afford to make needed repairs yet they have a strong desire to remain in their homes. There are roughly 9, 876 elderly people (over the age of 62 ) that reside in Orange County. According to the Orange County Department of Aging, 25% (2,557 ) of these elderly residents reported that they experience some mobility limitation, while 8 .4% experience some self care limitations (frail elderly) . 17 021 Over the past 12 months, the Orange-Person-Chatham Mental Health Center conducted a county-wide survey which revealed that there are approximately 185 patients with severe mental illness in the County. The treatment center acknowledges that not all cases of severe mental illness are reported or diagnosed, and further estimate that there are three times as many mentally ill patients in the County; there are roughly 555 severe mentally ill patients that reside in Orange County. The majority of this population needs some form of housing. Some are capable of living on their own in a family or group home situation, while others require more specialized living conditions. The majority of the housing for the Developmentally/Physically Disabled is supplied by Residential Services. The Freedom House is the only facility for persons recovering from substance abuse in Orange County. The 12 bed facility serves approximately 75 women per year, and almost all need housing once they leave the treatment center. The majority of these women are very low-income. A survey conducted in 1989 by the AIDS Service Agency of Orange County of all AIDS/HIV service and education providers identified housing as the greatest unmet need of people living with AIDS and related diseases. The primary service goal of the AIDS Service Agency of Orange County is to provide housing and high quality supportive services to people living with AIDS. As of June 1, 1993, there are a reported 69 HIV infected Orange County residents, and there are an estimated 15, 000 - 20,000 HIV positive persons in the state that have not been diagnosed or are asymptomatic There is not an available racial breakdown of the cases, however, one can presume that the distribution is similar to the national averages of 59% minority and 41% caucasian. The only adequate emergency medical facility for persons with AIDS in Orange County is UNC Hospital. Persons living with AIDS and those infected with HIV are often discharged from medical facilities and sent to the IFC Shelter. Unfortunately, the shelter does not provide adequate housing for persons living with AIDS due to the time limit for the stay, the lack of services, and the possibility of HIV infected persons picking up diseases from other shelter residents. There are facilities in Durham and Wake Counties, but transportation to the facilities from the UNC Hospital is unavailable. Because UNC Hospital is one of only 25 experimental treatment centers in the nation, as many as 1,000 HIV positive people from all over the state and the region come to the State Hospital for treatment. Currently, the clinic is treating 750 patients; approximately 300 people require hospitalization for one to two weeks per year, the HIV Case Management Team at UNC Hospital estimates that at least 25% are in desperate need of supportive housing. If a housing facility was established for persons with AIDS, the Hospital estimates that it would refer 75 18 022 -- - - patients annually to a special needs facility with an estimated stay of six months which would yield a twelve person annual occupancy. c. AVAILABLE RESOURCES To complete the goals outlined in this strategy, the following federal, state, and local resources will be available to Orange County and to Chapel Hill: 1. Federal Programs Public Housing Development This program provides federal aid to local public housing agencies (PHA' s) to develop housing for lower- income families. Local PHA' s such as the Town of Chapel Hill Department of Housing and Community Development develop, own, and operate public housing projects. HUD furnishes technical assistance in planning, developing, and managing the projects and gives three kinds of financial assistance: funding for development costs, annual contributions for operating subsidy, and modernization funds. Only low-income Chapel Hill residents are eligible for this program. Public Housing Operating Subsidy This program provides federal aid to local public housing agencies for project operation. HUD provides annual contributions (operating subsidies) required to help public housing authorities maintain and operate their projects, establish operating reserves, and offset operating deficits. The target groups for this project are low-income persons living in Chapel Hill and Carrboro. Comprehensive Grant Program This program dispenses federal aid to public housing agencies to finance capital improvements in public housing projects. HUD finances capital improvements and related management improvements in public housing projects to upgrade living conditions, correct physical deficiencies, and achieve operating efficiency and economy. This program targets group- public housing residents living in Chapel Hill and Carrboro. Community Development Block Grant (Entitlement) This program allots federal aid to promote sound community development. Annual Community Development Block Grant funds are provided on a formula basis to entitled communities to carry out a wide range of community development activities directed toward neighborhood revitalization, economic development, and improved community facilities and services. All CDBG activities must benefit low and moderate income persons; or aid in the prevention or elimination of slums and blight; or address other community development needs that present a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community. The Town of Chapel Hill targets low and moderate income persons at or below 80% of the area median income. 19 -423 HOME Housing Investment Partnership Program This federal program is authorized under Title II of the National Affordable Housing Act and provides funding for acquisition, housing rehabilitation, new construction and tenant-based rental assistance activities. HOPE I This federally assisted program provides homeownership opportunities for eligible families to purchase multifamily and non-scattered site, single family public and Indian housing. HUD awards both planning and implementation grants to selected eligible applicants to assist them in developing and carrying out homeownership programs for eligible families. This program is available in Chapel Hill public housing neighborhoods. HUD' s McKinney Act Transitional Housing Program This program allots federal aid to develop innovative approaches for providing housing and supportive services to homeless persons. The goal of this program is to develop supportive housing primarily for de- institutionalized homeless individuals, other homeless individuals with mental disabilities, and homeless families with children. Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation Program The funds allotted for this program are used to assist very low-income families in obtaining decent, safe, and sanitary housing, as well as privately owned, rehabilitated buildings. Orange County administers this program and is presently maintaining rental assistance for units which have been previously rehabilitated under this program. Section 8 Existing Housing Certificate Program This program is designed assist very low-income families in finding decent, safe, and sanitary private accommodations. This program is designed for very low-income families who are certified as eligible by the county. Tenants are encouraged to negotiate directly with landlords for rental housing that best meets their needs . The program allows tenants to move and continue to receive rent subsidies. Section 8 Existing Housing Voucher Program Similar to the housing certificate program, this program assists very low-income families in finding decent, safe, sanitary, and private housing accommodations. However, this program differs from the certificate program because allows families with greater choice in the selection of a rental unit. The housing voucher program permits families to rent units beyond the fair market rents. The Section 8 programs are targeted countywide. 2. Non-Federal Public i. State Programs Community Development Block Grants (Small Cities) Federal aid is supplied to promote sound community development to small cities and counties through the State of North Carolina. Grants are provided 20 024 to carry out a wide range of community development activities directed toward neighborhood revitalization, economic development, and improved community facilities and services. This program is available to citizens of Orange County (excluding Chapel Hill) and the Towns of Carrboro and Hillsborough. ii. Local Programs The Town of Chapel Hill Housing Loan Trust Fund Local funds are allocated to assist low- and moderate-income persons with homeownership opportunities. This fund was established in 1973 by the Town Council to assist low- and moderate- income persons by providing funds for homeownership opportunities and housing rehabilitation. The fund also provides for interest subsidies to reduce current market interest rates. ii. Private Resources Many commercial banks have responded to the Community Reinvestment Act with programs to finance decent, safe, affordable housing. Banks in Orange County with such programs include Wachovia, Nationsbank, Central Carolina Bank, First Union National Bank, BB & T, Centura Bank and First Citizens Bank. These special lending programs are targeted to households that do not qualify for the lenders ' regular programs and may have rates slightly lower than conventional rates, lower down payment requirements or special underwriting treatment. These funds are targeted county-wide. Additionally, several non-profit agencies in the County are resources in quest to increase housing affordabilty and availability. These include: Orange Community Housing Corporation; Habitat for Humanity of Orange County; Joint Orange Chatham Community Action Agency; and the Hillsborough Affordable Housing Corporation. 21 �=—Y — -. CHAS Table 1A U.S,Department of Housing and Urban Development + Office cf Community Planning and Development ;L_ _ Population&Household Data Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy(CHAS) G2 5 Instructions for Local Jurisdictions Name of Jurisdiction: TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL A. Population - E 1980 1990 % D. Relative Median Income of Jurisdiction Census Data Census Data Change (A) (8) (C) MSA Median Jurisdiction's National 1 Family Median Family Median 1. White(non–Hispanic) 27,491 31,444 14% Income Income(not Family available for Income urban 2. Black(non–Hispanic) 3,920 4,840 23% counties and consortia) 3. Hispanic(all races) 446 607 36% $41,571 $40,685 $35,939 4. Native American 91 122 34% - (non–Hispanic) 5. Asian&Pacific Islanders 484 1,678 247% (non–Hispanic) 6. Other(non–Hispanic) 29 28 –3% 7. Total Population 32,421 38,719 19% 1 8. Household Population 23,346 30,054 29% 9. Non–Household Population 9,075 8,665 –5% B. Special Categories (e.g.students,military,migrant farm workers,et.) 1.STUDENTS AT THE UNC–CH 21.465 23,852 11% C.Households Total %of Total %Very Low %Other Low %Moderate % Households Households Income Income Income Above 1990 0-50%MFI' 51–80%MFI' 81–95%MFI' 96%MFI* (A) (B) (C) (0) (E) (F) 1. White(non–Hispanic) 11,576 83% 24% 16% 8% 52% 2, Black(non–Hispanic) 1,523 11% 43% 26% 8% 24% 1 Hispanic (aiiraces) 157 I 1% 1 29% 27% 13% 31% 4. Native American 47 0% 32% 55% 0% 13% (non–Hispanic) 5. Asian&Pacific Islanders 548 4% 37% 27% 5% 31% (non–Hispanic) ( j � 6.All Households I 13,864 100% 26% I 18% 8% 48% •Or,based upon HUD adjusted income limits, if applicable HUD 40090–A(1)93) P -'---------------------------------�---- ----- p. -- ____ CHAS Table 1A �� U.S.De rtment of Housin 9 and Urban Development Office of Community Planning and Development _. _ — — Population&Household Data Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy(CHAS) Instructions for Local Jurisdictions Name of Jurisdiction: Orange County A. Population 1980 1990 % D. Relative Median Income of Jurisdiction Census Data Census Data Change (A) (B) (C) MSA Median Jurisdiction's National Family Median Family Median 1. White(non—Hispanic) 62,045 75,055 21% Income Income(not Family available for Income urban 2. Black(non—Hispanic) 13,239 14,847 12% counties and consortia) 3. Hispanic (all races) 809 1,279 58% $41,571 $40,685 $35,939 4. Native American 194 273 41% -- (non—Hispanic) 5. Asian& Pacific Islanders 710 2,352 231% (non—Hispanic) 6. Other(non—Hispanic) 58 45 —22% 7. Total Population 77,055 92,572 20% 8. Household Population 67,458 84,627 25% 9. Non—Household Population 9,597 7,945 —17% B.Special Categories (e.g.students,miliary,migrant farm workers,etc.) 1.Students at UNC—CH 21,465 23,852 11% C.Households Total %of Total %Very Low %Other Low %Moderate % Households Households Income Income Income Above 1990 0-50%MFI* 51-80%MFI* 81-95%MFI* 95%MFI* (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) 1. White(non—Hispanic) 29,889 82% 24% 19% 8% 49% 2. Black(non—Hispanic) 5,138 14% 50% 24% 8% 24% 3. Hispanic (all races) 366 1% 43% 16% 10% 32% 4. Native American 116 0% 37% 29% 0% 34% (non—Hispanic) 5. Asian& Pacific Islanders 758 2% 41% 25% 4% 31% (non—Hispanic) 6.All Households 36,278 100% 27% 19% 8% 45% *Or,based upon HUD adjusted income limits,if applicable _ 027 CHAS Table 1B U.S.Departmentof Housng and Urban Development Office of Community Planning and Development Market&Inventory Conditions Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy(CHAS) Instructions for Local Jurisdictions Name of Jurisdiction: Check One: 5 Year Period(enter fiscal yrs.) - .— - 1990 Census Chapel Hill Town _Other Source:(specify) FY: through FY: Date as of: (enter date) 1994 1999 A. Housng Stock Inventory 3 or more Total Vacancy Rate 0 and 1 bedroom 2 bedrooms bedrooms Category (A) (B) (C) (Oi (4 1. Total Year—Round Noising 14888 " 2,911 8,003 5,952 2.Total Occupied Units 13792 '* 2,841 5,451 5,700 Irle 3.Rattier 8,187 ••••*•••••i••••• 2,538 4,394 1,255 4.Owner 5,505 ••""""""""*•*•' 103 1,057 4,445 5.Total Vacant Units 1,074 *•"*"********'^'""� T 270 552 252 8.For Rent 832 7.17% 177 384 91 7.For Sale 197 3.40% 12 74 111 8.Other 245 ** 81 114 . 50 B.Substandard Units %Suitable for %Substandard Rehabllit8bn Category (A) (B) 1.AI Renter 0.003 100% 2.AI Owner 0.003 100% C.Public Housing 3 or more Total Vacancy Rate 0 and 1 bedroom 2 bedrooms bedrooms Category (A) (B) (C) (D! (4 1.Total 312 ••••••••• •••••••••••• 32 128 154 2.Vacant 11 4% ' **" Rehabilftatlon Estimated Hard Costs Physical Improvements: 'Grand Total PHA Needs: Needs: 82815270 I $3,102,980 D.Rents Rent Affordable Applicable FMRs at 30%of 50%MFI Unit Sine (A) (B) 0 Bedrooms 348 384 1 Bedroom 420 418 2 Bedrooms 494 488 3 Bedrooms 818 541 HUD 40090—A(1/93) • CHAS Table 1B U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development - - 0 28 Office of Community Planning and Development Market&Inventory Conditions Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy(CHAS) Instructions for Local Jurisdictions Name of Jurisdiction: Check One: 5 Year Period(enter fiscal yrs.) X_1990 Census _Other Source: (specify) FY: though FY: ORANGE COUNTY Data as of: (enter date) 1994 I 1999 A. Housing Stock Inventory 3 or mare Total Vacancy Rate 0 and 1 bedroom I 2 bedrooms bedrooms Category (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) 1. Total Year—Round Housing 38,683 5,224 14,797 18,662 2.Total Occupied Units 36,104 4,708 13,518 17,878 --- 3.Renter 16,161 4,331 8,623 3,207 4.Owner 19,943 377 4,895 14,671 r 6,Total Vacant Units 2,579 fwfffff*'t*tfttftttfff^fi 516 1,279 784 6.For Rent 1,249 I 7.17% 293 772 184 7.For Sale 423 2.08% 19 113 291 8.Other 907 4 204 394 309 ftf9RfRtM L*Rff}tftffffl B. Substandard Units %Suitable for II %Subsandard I Rehabilitation Category (A) (B) •I 1.All Renter 10% 7% 2.All Owner 10% I 8% C. Public Housing 3 or more Total I Vacancy Rate 0 and 1 bedroom 2 bedrooms bedrooms Category (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) 1.Total 312 32 126 154 2.Vacant 11 I 4% '^' .HROtff trwf t*1-*tf tsrrtfmrffrfft,rwf»ttffetttttw Rehabilitation Estimated Hard Costa-- Physical Improvements: I Grand Total PHA Needs: Needs: $2,615270 I $3,102,960 D.Rents Rent Affordable Applicable FMRs at 30%of 50%MFI Unit Size (A) (B) 0 Bedrooms 344 364 1 Bedroom 418 416 2 Bedrooms 494 468 • 3 Bedrooms 617 541 HUD 40090—A(1,93) • • CHAS Table 1 C U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Community Planning and Development Housing Assistance Needs of Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy(CHAS) Low&Moderate Income Households Instructlons for Local Jurisdictions -----------------------------------------------———--------------------------------------------------------------------- Name of Jurisdiction I Sources of Data I Data Iscurrent I Five Year Period: 1 (as of the following date: I FY: through FY: Chapel Hill Town I 1990 CENSUS DATA I OCTOBER 1993 11993 liege ----------------------— —----------- I Renters I Owners I---------------------------------------------—-----------------I---------------------------------------I------------ Ho Lee hold by I Elderly I I I I I I I I Type,Income,&Housing Problem I 1&2 Member I Small Related I Large Related I All Other I Total Renters ( Elderly I All Other I TOtai 1 Total I Households 1 (2 to 4) 1 (5 or more) I Households I I I Owners I Owners I Households I (A) I (a) I (C) 1 (D) 1 (E) I (F) I (G) I (H) I (1) -------------------------------I------------I------------I------------I-----------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------ 1.Very Low Income(0 to 50%MFI)• 1 305 1 571 1 85 1 2,2141 3,155 1 255 1 148 1 510 1 3,065 ------------------ — ----------'I------------I------------i------------I-----------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------ 2. 0 to 30%MFI` 1 177 I 331 1 85 1 1,277 1 1,650 1 180 I 107 1 322 I 2,172 ----------------------------------I---—-------I-----------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------ 3. %with any Housing Problems 1 81%1 76%1 91%1 91%1 86%1 66% 1 79%1 72% 1 85% -------------------------------'I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------ 4. %CostBurden>30% 1 81%1 76%1 75%1 91%1 87%1 66% 1 79%1 72%1 85% ----------------------------------I------------I------------I------------I------—----I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------ 5. %Cost 8 urden>50% I 87%1 67%1 48%1 67% 1 80%1 46% 1 56%1 50%1 76% -----------------------------'I------------I------------I------------I--------- I------------I------------I------------I-----------I------------ 6. 31 to 50%MFI• 1 128 1 2401 0 1 937 1 1,305 1 75 1 41 1 188 1 1,493 ---------------------------------I------------I------------i------------I-----------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------ 7. %with any Housing Problems 1 78%1 72%1 ERR 1 92%1 87%1 46% 1 80%I 68% 1 84% ------------------------------ ------------1------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------ 8. %CostBurden>30% 1 78%I 66%1 ERR 1 90% 1 84%1 46% 1 80%1 68%1 82% ---------------------------------i------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------i------------ 9. %Cost B urden>50% 1 50%1 13%I ERR I 34% 1 32%I 9% 1 44%I 35%1 32% ---------------------------------i------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------ 10.Other Low—income(51 to80%MFI)• 1 1871 5161 561 1,2241 1,9831 1371 1991 5341 2,517 ----------------------—----------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------i------------I------------I------------I------------ 11. %with any Housing Problems 1 85%1 32%I 88% 1 43%1 43%I 23% I 42%1 49% 1 44% ----------------------------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------ 12. %Cost B urden>30% 1 65%1 28%1 48%( 42%1 41%1 23% 1 42%I 49% I 42% ----------------------------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------ 13. %CostBurden>50% I 11%1 0%I 21%1 0%I 2% 1 5% I 11%1 14%1 5% ------------------------—--------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------1------------I------------ 14. Moderate Income(81-95%MFq` 1 41 1 2721 14 1 383 1 710 1 198 1 41 1 374 1 1,064 -----------------------—-------i------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------- 15. %with any Housing Problems I 34%1 11%1 0% 1 5% I 9% 1 19% 1 54%1 33%I 17% -------------------------------'I------------I------------I------------t------------I—----------I------------I------------I------------I------------ 16. %Cost B urden>30% 1 34%1 8%1 0% 1 5%1 6%1 19% I 54%1 33%1 17% ---------------------------------I------------1------------i------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------ 17. %CostB urden>50% I 34%1 0%I 0% 1 0% 1 2% 1 0% I 17%( 7% I 4% -----—--------------------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------ 16. Total Households" 1 777 1 2,169 I 230 1 4,792 i 7,968 1 1,722 I 1,001 1 5,898 I 13,664 I ---------------------------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------I------------ 19. %with any Housing Problems 1 57%1 30%I 47% 1 54%1 48%I 15% 1 33%1 22%1 37% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Or,based upon HUD ad)usted income limits,if appllcable. form HUD-40090—A(1/93) •`Includes all income groups--including those above 95%of MFI I W I ,' CHAS Table 10 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Community Planning and Development Housing Assistance Needs of Comprehensive Housing Affordability Stategy(CHAS) Low&Moderate Income Households Instructions for Local Jurisdictions ---=------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------t`}---- Name of Jurisdiction: I Sources of Data: I Data is current I Five Year Period: ORANGE COUNTY I 1as of the following date: I FY: through 11990 CENSUS DATA I OCTOBER 1993 11994 11999 --------------------------------- ----------- —---------- --------------- ----------- --------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Renters I Owners I I----------------------------------------------------------------1---------------------------------------^I----------- Household by 1 Elderly I I I I I I I 'I Type, Income, &Housing Problem 1 1&2 Member 1 Small Related 1 Large Related 1 All Other 1 Total Renters ( Elderly 1 All Other I Total 1 Total 1 Households I (2 to 4) 1 (5 or more) 1 Households i 1 I Owners 1 Owners 1 Households ----I (A) I (B) I (C) I (D) I (E I (F) I (G) i (H) I (1) --------------------------------- Very Low Income(0 to 50%MFI)* i 612 1 1,364 1 208 1 4,339 1 6,523 1 1,592 1 1,817 1 3,409 1 9,932 ---------------------------------1------------1------------1------------1------------1------------1------------1------------1------------1------------ 2 0 to 30%MFI* 1 396 1 773 1 139 1 2,520 1 3,830 1 1,049 1 693 1 1,742 1 5,572 ---------------------------------1------------1------------j------------1------------1------------1------------1------------1------------1------------ 3. %with any Housing Problems 1 72% 1 78% ( 96% j 91% 1 86% 1 65% 1 80% 1 71% 1 82% ---------------------------------1------------1------------1------------j------------I------------1------------1------------1------------1------------ 4. %Cost Burden>30% 1 64% 1 B% 1 88% 1 89% 1 84% 1 65% 1 78% 1 70% 1 80% ---------------------------------1------------1------------1------------j------------1------------1------------1------------1------------1------------ 5. %Cost Burden>50% ( 50% 1 63% 1 26% 1 85% 1 75% 1 30% 1 57% 1 40% 1 64% ---------------------------------1------------j------------1------------I------------I------------I------------I------------1------------I------------- . 6. 31 to 50%MFI* 1 214 1 591 1 691 1,819 1 2,693 1 543 1 1,1241 1,667 1 4,360 ---------------------------------1------------i------------1------------1------------I------------1------------I------------I------------1------------ 7. %with any Housing Problems j 76% 1 65% 1 100%1 91% 1 84% 1 27% 1 60%1 49% 1 - 71% ---------------------------------1------------I------------1------------1------------j------------1------------1------------1------------1------------ 8. %Cost Burden>30% 1 76% 1 63% 1 43% 1 90% 1 82% 1 22% 1 5B%1 46% 1 68% ---------------------------------1------------1------------1------------1------------1------------1------------i------------1------------1------ _----- 9. %Cost Burden>50% 1 40% 1 10% 1 0%j 32% 1 27% 1 7% 1 22% 1 17% 1 23% ---------------------------------1------------1------------1------------I---- -1------------I------------1------------I------------I------------ 10.Other Low—Income(51 to 60%MFI)* 1 222 1 1,1871 1791 2,282 1 3,870 I 802 1 2,3981 3,200 1 7,070 --------------------------------1------------1------------1------------1------------1 ------------1------------1 ------------1------------1------------ 11. %with any Housing Problems 1 60% 1 28% 1 61% 1 36% 1 36% 1 14% 1 33% 1 28% 1 32% --------------------------------1------------1------------1-----------1------------1------------1------------1------------1------------I------------ 12 %Cost Burden>30% 1 60% 1 26% 1 35%j 35% 1 33% 1 14% 1 30% 1 26% 1 30% ---------------------------------1------------1------------1-----------I------------I------------I------------1------------1------------1------------ 13. %Cast Burden>50% 1 9% 1 1% 1 7%j 1% 1 2% 1 5% 1 6%1 6% 1 3% -------------—------------------1------------1------------1------------I------------1------------I------------1------------1------------1------------ 14. Moderate Income(81-95%MFI)* 1 47 1 593 1 471 637 1 1,324 1 304 1 1,2981 1,602 1 2,926 ---------------------------------1-----------1------------i-----------I------------I------------I------------1 ------------I------------I------------ 15 %with any Housing Problems 1 30% 1 6% 1 19%1 4% 1 6% 1 12% 1 21% 1 188% 1 106% ---------------------------------1-----------1------------1------------I------------1------------I------------1------------1------------1------------ 16 %Cost Burden>30% 1 30% 1 5% ( 19%j 4% 1 6%1 12% 1 19% 1 18% 1 13% ---------------------------------I------------1------------1-----------I------------1------------I------------1------------1------------1------------ 17. %Cost Burden>50% 1 30% 1 0% 1 0%j 0% 1 1% 1 0% 1 4%1 3% 1 2% ----------------—---------------1------------1------------1------------1------------1------------1------------1------------1------------1------------ 18. Total Households** 1 1,157 1 4,772 1 575 1 8,961 1 15.4651 4,6691 16.1441 2Q 813 1 36.278 ---------------------------------1------------1------------1------—----1------------1------------1------------1 ------------1------------1------------ 19. %with any Housing Problems ( -------5------------?---I--------5-----------54%-I----------I--------------------?--------------I--------3 ----------------------------------- *Or,based upon HUD adjusted income limits,ifapplicable. form HUD-40090—A(1193) **Includes all income groups--including those above 95%of MFI 1 I f I I I — CHAS Table 1D U.S.Department of Housing art Urban Development O Office of Community Planning and Development Homeless Population&Subpopufaiona Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy(CHAS) Instructions for Local Jurisdictions Name of Jurisdt3iot: — — Five Year Period:(enter fiscal yrs.) - — FY: though FY: ORANGE COUNTY - 1994 1999 Part 1:Homeless Population ---v--- Sheltered Unsheltered Total - - - (A) (8) (C) Homeless Families with Children — — 1. Number of Homeless Famiies 40 40 80 2. Number of Persons Homeless Fatnfllea 120 • 120 240 Homeless hdivduais — — 3. Youth(17 years or younger) 95 95 190 4. Adults(18 yeas and older) — 950 950 1,900 5. Total(Ihes 2+3+4) — — — 1,165 1,165 0 — - Part 2:Slibpopulations — — Sheltered Unsheltered Homeless Persons with Service Needs Related to: (%) (%) 1. Severe Mental Illness(SMI)Orly — — 20% 20% • 2. Alcahol/Ober Drug Abuse Only 40% 40% 3. SMI&Alcohol/Ober Drug Abuse 50% 50% 4. Domestic Volence — — 30% 30% 5. Hopeless Your 10% 10% 6. AIDS/Related Des • 7. Other(specffiy) — — — — HUD 4D090—A(1/93) CHAS Table 1E 0 3 U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development j' Office of Community Planning'and Development Non—Homeless Special Needs Populations Comprehensive Housing Affordabilty Strategy(CHAS) Instructions for Local Jurisdictions Name of Jurisdiction: I Data Source:(specify) I Five Year Period:(enter fiscal yrs.) ORANGE COUNTY I AGENCY SURVEY FY: ttrough FY: Current Data as of: (date) I OCTOBER 1993 1994 j 1999 Households in Need of Supportive Housing 1.Elderly 250 2.Frail Elderly 250 3.Severe Mental Illness 185 4.Developmentally Disabled It 50 5. Physically Disabled 50 6. Persons with Alcohol/Other Drug Addiction i J 57 7. Persons with AIDS and Related Diseases 50 8.Other(Specify): Instructions for Table 1 E Non—Homeless Special Needs Populations Refer to Appendix A,General Definitions Used with the CHAS,for Line 2—— Enter the estimated number of frail elderly additional defintions of terms used in this table. households in need of supportive housing. Table 1 E provides a format for estimating the need for supportive Line 3—— Enter the estimated number of households housing for other(than homeless)populations with special needs. composed of at least one person with severe mental Some potential resource agencies and client groups they serve ilness in need of supportive housing. include: Line 4—— Enter the estimated number of households o State or local mental health agencies for persons with severe composed of at least one developmentally disabled mental ilness; person In need of supportive housing. o State or local agencies of mental retardation or State local Line 5—— Enter the estimated number of households developmental disabilities councils for people with developmental composed of at least one physically disabled person disabilities; in need of supportive housing. o State rehabilitation agencies or State or local Centers for Line 6—— Enter the estimated number of households Independent Living for people with physical disabilities; composed of at least one person with alcohol/other drug addiction in need of supportive housing. o State or area agencies on aging for elderly people; Line 7-— Enter the estimated number of households o The Public Heatth Service Center for Disease Control for persons composed of at least one person with AIDS and related with Aids, diseases in need of supportive housing. Line B—— Estimate for any other category of special Specific Instructions: need that the jurisdiction may identify the number of households in need of supportive housing. Line 1-- Enter the estimated number of elderly households in need of supportive housing. HUD 40090—A(1/93) U33 II . FIVE YEAR STRATEGY A. SUMMARY OF FIVE YEAR STRATEGY Orange County' s strategic purposes and objectives in this five year strategy include: * Increasing the supply of standard, affordable rental housing through the rehabilitation of existing housing units and, if appropriate, the construction of new units; * Promoting homeownership for first-time homebuyers at 60% and below area median income; * Addressing the needs of homeless individuals and homeless families with children; * Maintaining/Revitalizing existing neighborhoods through the rehabilitation of deteriorated housing and the alleviation of inadequate plumbing facilities; * Reducing lead-based paint hazards; * Meeting the housing needs of large families and persons other than the homeless with special needs such as the mentally ill and those recovering from substance abuse; * Encourage low income families in public and assisted housing to participate in a homeownership program or an organized program to achieve economic independence and self- sufficiency. * Providing transitional housing opportunities for the homeless and special populations to bridge the gap between the homeless shelter and the private or assisted housing markets. * Facilitating the construction of Single Room Occupancy (SRO) units in the County as an alternative housing option. 30 CHAS Table 2 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Developmert Office of Community Planning and Development Priorities for Assistance Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) 6—Year Plan Instructions for Local Jurisdictions O --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Cy 3--- Name of Jurisdiction: 1 Five Year Period: (enter fiscal yrs.) FY: through FY: TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL I I 11994 11999 ------------------------------ Renters I Owners I Homeless I Non—Homeless 1 -----------------------------------------1 ---------------------------I Persons 1 Persons Elderly 1 Small I Large I All 1 Existing 11 st—Time Homeowners 1 1 with Special 1 1 &2 1 Related 1 Related I Other I Homeowners 1-----------------I Indvdls. 1 Families I Needs 1 Member I Households I Households I Households 1 1 with I All I I 1 Households 1(6 or more) 1(6 or more) I ( I Children I Others I I I A. Household Income ( (A) I (B) I (C) I (D) 1 (E) 1 (F) 1 (G) 1 (H) 1 (1) I (J) ---------------1---------1----------1----------1---------1 ---------1-------I---------I-------1 -------1 ---------------- 1.Very Low I I I I I I I I I I 0 to 30%WI* 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 I 3 1 I I ---------------1 ---------1----------I----------i---------1 ---------I-------1---------I I I 2.Very Low I I I I I I I I I I 31 to 60%MFI* ( 2 1 1 1 2 ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I ---------------1---------I----------1----------i---------1 ---------1 -------I---------I I I 3.Other Low I I I I I I I I I I 61 to 80%WI* 1 2 I 1 I 2 I 1 1 21 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 I 2 ------------------I---------I----------1----------I ---------I ---------1-------I---------1 -------1 -------1---------------- B. Activity I I I I I I I I I I 1.Acquisition Ix ix 1x IX I Ix lx IX Ix IX ---------------1 ---------I----------I----------I---------1 ---------1-------I---------I -------1 -------1 ---------------- 2.Rehabilitation l x l x I X I x I X 1 x l x I X I X I X ---------------1---------i----------I ----------I ---------I ---------1-------1---------I -------I -------I ---------------- 3.New I I I I I I I I I I Construction (x (x Ix Ix i 1x 1x Ix Ix Ix. ---------------I---------I ----------I----------I---------1 ---------1-----------------1 -------I -------I ---------------- 4.Rental I I I I I I****"**'********''*********I I I x Assistance I x 1 x I x I X ---------------I-----------------------------------------1 ---------1 -----------------1 -------1 -------1 ---------1— 6. Homebuyer s I*******************************«*********** �****.I I x I x I I ( --- Assistance ---- ----------- 1-----------------------------------------I ---------1-------1 ---------i -------1 -------I-----------,-=1 -- 6.Support 1 I I I I I I I I I Facilities I x I I I I I ( i x i x I X &Services I I I I I I I I I I ----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *Or, based upon HUD adjusted Income limits, if applicable. r CHAS Table 2 U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Community Planting and Development Priorities for Assistance Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) 6—Year Plan Instructions for Local Jurisdictions ------------------------------------- Name of Jurisdiction: 1 Five Year Period: (enter fiscal yrs.) FY: through FY: ORANGE COUNTY I I 11994 11999 ------------------------ 1 Revers 1 Owners 1 Homeless (Non—Homeless 1 -----------------------------------------1 ---------------------------1 Persons 1 Persons 1 Elderly I Small I Large I All 1 Existing 11 st—Time Homeowners 1 1 with Special 1 1 &2 1 Related I Related 1 Other 1 Homeowners)-----------------1 Irxivdls. I Families 1 Needs 1 Member 1 Households 1 Households 1 Households ( 1 with 1 All 1 I I 1 Households 1(6 or more) 1 (6 or more) I ( 1 Children 1 Others I I I A. Household Income -1 (A) I (B) I (C) I (D) I (E) I (F) I (G) I (H) -------------- 1---------1----------1 ----------i---------1 ---------I-------1 ---------I -------1 -------1 ---------------- 1.Very Low 0 to 30%MFl* 1 2 I 2 I 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 l 0 l I I ---------------1---------1----------1----------1 ---------1 ---------1-------1---------1 I I 2.Very Low I I I I I I I I I I 31 to 60%WI* I 2 1 2 I 1 1 0 I 1 I 1 1 2 1 I I ---------------I ---------1 ----------1----------1 ---------I ---------I ----- }---------I I 3.Other Low 61 to 80%MFI* I 2 I 2 I 1 1 0 I 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 ------------------I ---------1 ----------1----------1 ---------I ---------1 -------1 ---------1 -------1 -------1 ---------------- B. Activity I I I I I I I I I I 1.Acquisition I I I I I Ix Ix Ix Ix Ix ---------------I ---------1 ----------1----------1 ---------1 ---------I -------1---------1-------1-------I ---------------- 2. Rehabilitation I x I x I x I x I x I X I x I x I X I x ---------------I ---------I----------I ----------I---------I ---------I -------1---------1-------1 -------1---------------- 3.New Construction I x I x I x I x I I x I x I x I x x ---------------I ---------I----------1 ----------I ---------I ---------1 -----------------1-------I -------1---------------- 4.Renal x Assistance I X I X I x I X I I 1 I I --------------- ------I ---------I X------�X- -------I-------I -------I ----------{ -=-a - &Homebuyers ****** ************ + Assistance — ------------- ----------------------------------------- ------- ------ -------- ------ =--- 6. Support I I I I I I I I I I Facilities I x I I I I I I I x I x I x &Services --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *Or, based upon HUD adjusted income limits, if applicable W UT CHAS Tat bte 3A U.S.Department of Housingand Urban Development Office of Community Planning and Development In%estmem Plan Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy(CHAS) --------__-_-----_- instructions for Local Jurisdictions - ----------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- C Name of Jurisdiction: IFY: (J„� 11984 TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL I ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ -- I Amount Recelved I Plan to I Planned Use of Resources Expected to be Recehed During the FY I Amount ReceWed Support 1 by the Jurisdiction I Apply/ I------------------------------------------------------------------------------I by Other Entitles I Applimtlon 1 Last Fiscal Year I Submit I I I Now I Rental (Home Buyer I Planning (Support I Operating 1 Last Fiscal Year 1 by Other Funding Source 1 §000s) I I Acquisition I Rehabiltation (Construction I Assiskmas 1 Assislance I (Services 1 Costs 1 (5000s) I Entities I (A) I (B) I (C) I (D) i (E) I (F) I (G) I (H) 1 (1) 1 (Jl I (K) I P-) ----------------------I-----------------I------I----------I------------I-----------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- A. Formula/Entitlement I.......................I.........1.............I.................1...............I............1............1..........I.........I...........1. ...................I.. ....... . Programs I.....................—I.....».1»..........._I.................1..............1............I..,.........1..........I.»«.«,.1 I....».....1—............«,.....I..,......., ---------------------I-----------------I-----I----------I------------I-----------I--------i---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- 1. HOME I i I I I I I I - I.....—I I—.....—*....—.11.....*-- ----------------------I-----------------I------I----------I------------I-----------I--------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- 2. CDBG $ 433 I $285 1 Y 1 16%1 51%1 4r F 1 16%1 3%1..........,I«...................11........... --------------------- ----------------- -----I----------I------------I----------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I----—---------I---------- 3. ESG I I I....... ....r1 I •r..».r»..r1........»»I»»..r...»1.........'1 I I I ----------------------1-----------------i------I----------I-----------I----------i_--____I---------I____—_1------I--------I---------------I---------- 4. HOPWA I I I I I i I............1 I I I....................11........... -------------------I-----------------I------I----------I------------I-----------I------ I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------i---------- 5. DOE/Offrer Energy I I I.............'I I I............I..,.........I......:=..I........11...........1 1.,..,.«.... Programs I I ...........**1 I 1. , ,..... .1. ........ .1........,,1........11. ....... .1 1....««..... -------------------I-----------------I------I----------I------------I-----------1 ...------1--- -----I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- a. Public Hsg. 1....»»»».........„I.».....•I.............. I...............I............I............I 1...=«..«11...........1 I Comprehanaive Grant I...—....................I......—I«.......—*-1 100%1. ....... 1.......... .I. ........ .I 1........11. ....... ..1 $366 ----------------------I-----------------I------I----------I------------I----------I---------1-- ------I-- -----I------I----------------------- 7. Subtobl- I $295 1«........1..............1.....«......»...I.....«......«..I..........«.1.,,,.«.,..,,1.«,..,«,,.I..,,,,,«11...........1 $ass 1........... Formula Programs I I........-I..............1.................1...... .......1.......... .1. ..._.... =1.,.=....,.1........11. .......-.1 I........... --------------------I-----------------I------I----------I----------I-----------I---------1—-------I-------I------I----- -I---------------I---------- B. Competitive Programs I....»..............».I........1......»»...1. .......,,......1.....»..».»1»....».. .I. ......., .I..........I........1 I.......,...1....................,I........... ----------------------I-----------------I------I----------I------------I-----------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------1---------------I---------- e. HOME I $803 1 x 1 50 1 &% 1 300 I I I I.«...«..11 1—............ ......*.... ---------------------I--------------I------I----------I------------I-----------I--------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- 9. HOPE 1 I I I I 1..... ''1 I` ........ $50 1 X ----------------------I-----------------I------I----------I------------I-----------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I--------- 10. HOPE 2 I I I I I"""""""7 I i ----------------------I-----------------I------I----------1------------I-----------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- 11. HOPE3 I I I I 1'°"'°"°«'-i«'°*".*... I I 1"'«"""`I I -------------------I---------------I------I----------I------------I----------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I--------- 12- ESG I I I—.......—1 1.......«.......I.......... .1. ........ .1..........1 I I I ---------------------I-----------------I------I----------I------------I-----------I------- 1--------I---- ---I------I--------I---------------I---------- 13. Supportive Housing I I I I I I I'«"""""I«"««""•I I I I ---------------------I-----------------I------I----------I------------I-----------I---------I---------I-------I------i--------I---------------I---------- 14. HOPWA I I I I I I I—*...•.... I ---------------------I-----------------I------I----------I------------I-----------I---------I---------I-------i------I--------I---------------I---------- 15. Shelter Plus Care I----------------1------1•.........—I..........«......L............._I--------�...........,i..........I.._...—i—........I...............«.,..,I....««,«...- _ 1 -------------------- - 1& Safe Havens I I I I I"`""`«""""I""""""I"'«"«""'I*.....—I I I I -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #Eligible only under r certainchm custarces Page 1 oft lorm HUD-40090-A(1/93) --------- Li 1 _ ii CHAS Table 3A Investment Plan-Continued ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------- --------------------------------- Amount Received I Plan to I Planned Use of Resources Expected to be Received Duringthe FY I Amount Flac lved I Support I by the Jitisdictlon I Apply/ I------------------------------------------------------------------------ b Other Entities Last Fiscal Year Submit New Rental Home Buyer Planning Su -I y 1 Application Other I i I I I I I Ye 1 9 1 Support I Opeetlng I Last Fiscal Year I by Ottvar Funding Source I FOODS) I I Acquisition I Rehabilitation IConstructlon I Assistance I Assistance I I Services I Costs I (60006) I Entitles I (A) i (B) I (C) I (D) I (E) I (F) I (G) I (H) I Ol I (J) I (K) 1 N ---------------------I----------------I------I---------I-----------I----------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------i---------- B. Competitive Programs 1....................... «........1*«,.,,,,,,.*,1........„.......1............«.I.........* .I....».,.,..1.........,1*....*,.,1. ....,.»­­I Continued 1.........*.............I.........1.,***,.,...*.1....*.......*....1......*........1............I**........,.I,*,,......1..«...,,,1,.,........1.»......,_..........,I....*...... ----------------------I-----------------I------I----------I------------I-----------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I-----------r---I---------- 17. RunlHomeless I I I I I`"***'**"**"I I************1******...11 I I I Housing I I I I I**,•*•••'*'**`'I 1************I******...11 ---------------------1-----------------I------I----------I------------I-----------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- 16. See.202 Elderly I.*,*..................al.,......'I I I I I.,.«.....«.,1.........,1 1**...«,,,.*1 I --------------------I-----------------I------I----------I-----------I-----------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I--------- 18. Sec.611 Handicapped I•==••••••••••••••••••••I.....*•'1 I 1 I 1'******`***`I°. .....'1 I***********I I ---------—---------i-----------------I------I----------I------------1----------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- 20. ModsrateRehabSRO 1*..**..........*..*.*..I.........1..............1....*....**».,.,.1:,,.,..*......'I I*.„*..,...,1......*,*,I.......*,1.......*... I i -------------------- --------------------- 21. Rentalvouchers I*.........**....*„*,* 1...*,,..I....*«*......I.................1...........*,*I 1*....**...*.I**.......11.«*.«,,..1**«.......*1 I ---------------------I-----------------I------I----------I-----------I----------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- 22. Rental Cartificatea ...... =*....... ----------------------I-----------------I------1----------I------------I-----------1---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- 23. Public Housing i............*.****.**..1.,*,.,..'I I I i.,.*,...,«..I,.. ,,*...««1.,.*.,...,1........,i*...*.**.*.I I Development 1*..*...................I**«,.,,.'I I I i**,.,,,,.*..1....,*.«....1.*.......,1**.*...*,1..«..,,..,,1 I -------------------i-----------------I------I----------I------------I----------i—-------I---------i-------I------I--------I---------------I--------- 24. Public Housing MROP i*..................*,*.I.........1.«.***,.,.,..1 1.............._1..........*.I*»»*.......*1..*...**.,I.......„1........... 1 1 ---------------------I-----------------I------I----------1------------I--------I------ I---------I-------I------I--------1---------------I---------- 25. Public Housing CLAP 1..,«.«.«.«.««.......*..1.........1*.............I I..*.*........*1....*...*...I....*..,...,1.*,.*.*.,,1....,...11..........,1 I ---------------------I-----------------I------I----------I------------I-----------I---------1=--------I-------I------I--------I--------------I--------- 26. DOEtOther Energy I I I....*..**...»'I I I.******...*.I*...........1...*.....11....*.*.,I......,...,1 I... ,,«,*,.« Programs I I I....*.*.*.**._I I I............1............I........*11.*...«*.I...*.*.*...1 I....****... ---------------------I-----------------I------I----------I------------I-----------I---------I---------I-------I----------------I---------------I---------- 27. LIHTC 1*=*...***..,»......=*..1.*.....*I*............I.,..»..,*..,.,.,.1,.*.».«,.,,„*_i.*..*...*...1*..**...*.**I*.........1.........1,.**....... 1 I ---------------------I-----------------I------I----------I------------I---------1---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------i---------- 28. F mHA 1*..**..................1......... I I I I i..*......11• ....,.,1. ....**. .I 1........... --------------------I----------------I------I----------I------------I-----—----I---------I---------I-------I-----I----•-I---------------I---------- 29. Lead-Based Paint I $12 I I.,..,,,*«..*•q I.......*...***_I.,.....**.,,1.,..*.,,,,*.I 100%i.,.*...,,1 I..,*................,1....,.««... Abatement I I 1.*.......*.«.'I I....,,,..,*,,..1,**....**..*1.,..,.......1 1,*,,,.*.,1 1„......,..*,..*,,...I..,....*.., ---------------------I-----------------I------I----------I------------I--------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- 30. Other I w I I I I I I I 100%I I I 620 I=•***_*__•• --------------------i-----------------I------I----------I------------I----------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- 31. subtotal I seas I..v......I.........* .I....*...,,........1 ..........*.r1...*.*....,rl*..*..***.*.I**»*...*,1...r.*.*,1...........1 $70 I*..r..,,... Competitive Programs I 1.*......I....*........1......*,...*.***,1..,.,......««.1,..,,..,.*„I*««.,,*....*1..***....11..... --- -- I-----------------I------I---------I------------I-----------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------i---------- C. 32.Total-Federal I $1,130 I.*...,,,.1..,.........*I****.*...........1...,**...*,.*,.I.***,**.....1***........*I***.**.*.,1......**,I....,......1 $436 ----------I-----------------I------I----------I------------I--------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------i---------- 33.Total-Slate 1 $20 I********I I I 1 I I I I I 1***...*.... -----------------I-----------------I------i----------I------------I-----------I---------I------- I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- 34.Total-Local I $150 1.**......I I I I I I I I I 1'.......- - ---------------I-----------------I------I----------I------------I-----------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- 35.Total-Private I 1*.*„*„'I I I I I I I I I I°***...... ----------------------I-----------------I------I----------I-----------I----------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------i---------- 36. Total-AIISources i $1,300 1.......*'I**.*.**......1,,,*......*.....*I*...,...„....1..*..,,.,.,,1*,.....*...*1.....**..,1,,,..,.«,I,*„*....,,1 $436 1....«.*.... ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2 of 2 form HUD-40090-A(1,93) CHAS Table 3A U.S.Department of Housingand Urban Development Office of Community Planning and Development Investment Plan Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy(CHAS) Instructions for Local Jurisdictions ---------------------------------------- - ----------------------------------------------------------------- Name of Jurisdiction: IFV: ORANGE COUNTY 11994 ---------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- I I Amount Received ( Plan to I Planned Use of Resources Expected to be Received During the FY I Amount Rece Ned I Support I by the Jurisdiction I Apply/ I---------------------------------------------------------------------------I by Other Entities I Appllration I Last Fiscal Year 1 Submit I I I New I Rental IHome Buyer I Planning I Support I Operating I Last Fiscal Year I by Other Funding Source 1 (60004) I 1 Acquisition ( Rehabilitation (Construction I Assistance I Assistance I I Services I Costs I (S000a) I Entities I (A) I (B) I (C) i (D) I (E) I (F) I (G) I (H) 1 (1) I (J) I (K I a) ----------------------I-----------------I------I-------i------------I---—------I---------I---------I-------i------I--------I---------------I---------- A. Formula/Entltlement I.......................1.........1..............I.................1...............1............1............I..........1.........I...........I....................,I........... Programs ---- I.......................1......,.-1.............i.................1....,..........1........,,,.1.......,....1.........,1........,1...........I.....,..............,I........... ---'---------- I-----------------I------I--------I------------I----------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- 1. HOME I I I i I I I I I..... —I I....................,I.».,....... ---------------------I-----------------I------I----------i------------I--------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I--------- 2. CDBG 6 433 1 $285 1 Y 1 16%j 51%1 # # 1 16%1 3%1...........I....................,1.......... . ------------------- I----------------I------I-------i------------I----------I---------I---------I------I------I--------I---------------I-------- 3. EGG I I I.............1 I ............r1............ 1....,.......1,...,.....1 I I I -------------------I-----------------I------I---------I------------I--------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- 4. HOPWA I I I I I I I.........—I I ( I•.,.......•.,.......11—...`.... --------------------I----------------- ------ ---------------------- ---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- 5. DOE/Other Energy I I I—........... I 1............1............1.........,1........,1.....,.....1 I........... Programs I I I.............. I I............i».,..,......1.........,1.........1...........1 I.......... -------------- . ------ -------- -------- ------ ------ -------- --------------I---------- e. Public Hog. 1....,.,»...............1........1............,I 1........,......1............1............1 1........,1........... 1 I --- Comprehensive Grant 1..............,..........,1........1............,-1 100% 1,.....„......I,,..,.......1............1 1.....,..,1.,.......,.) $366 -------- ------- ------ -----------------------i--------- 7. Sublolal- I s295 1........ ..............�. ......,........1. ....... ,.........I.......—I..........I. ....... .1 $ass .......... Formula Programs I 1.........1..........„.-I,,........*...,..I. .............I.......,.. .1............1,...,....,1, ..«,,.,1,»,...,....1 I».»........ -------------------I-----------------I------I----------I------------1---------I---------I---------I-------1------I--------I---------------I---------- B. Competitive Programs 1.......................1........1.............1.................1...........1............I............1.........,1........,1...,,......1....................,1....,...... ---------------------I----------------I------I----------1-----------I----------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I--------- B. HOME I $awl X 1 501 8501 3001 I 1 1........,1 I......».............11.,.,....... --------------------I-----------------I------I-------I----------I—--------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- 8. HOPE 1 I I I I 1•••••••......•1 $50 I X ---------------------I-----------------I------I----------I-----------I—--------I--------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- 10. HOPE I I , I I I—*...........I I I I ........I I ----------------------i-----------------I------I----------I------------I-----------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- 11. HOPES I I I I I......—...... —.....*-1 ---------------------I-----------------I------I---------I-----------I----------I-------I-------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- 12. EGG I I 1..`..,........I 1..............1........,...1........,...1...,..,,.,1 I I I ---------------------I-----------------I------I----------I-----------I-----------I------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- 13. Supportive Housing I I I I I I I�••:••••••••I"•,••""I I I I ------------------I-----------------I------I----------I-----------I----------I-------I-------I-------I------I--------I--------------I---------- 14. HOPWA I I I I I I I I......"""'1 I 1 I I ---------------------I-----------------I------I----------I------------I----------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- 15. Sheller Plus Care I I 1.............I.................1'.,`...........I I............I.........,I,,......,1,..........1........,*....,..»,.,I..........,. � -------------------I-----------------I------I----------I-----------I----------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- la. Safe Havens I I I I 1......•,••••••.I""""""I""""""I"""""I I I I ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #Eligible onty under certaincircumstarces Page 1 of 2 form HUD-40090-A(1,93) CHAS Table 3A Investment Plan-Continued ------------------- -----------------------------------------------'-------------9---------------------------I-------------I-------- Amount As ce Ned I Plan to I Planned Use of Resources E)pacted to be Received During the FY Amount Received Support by the Jurisdiction I Apply/ I---------------------------------------------------- ----------- Last Fiscal Year I Submit I I I New I Rental I Home Buyer I Planning (Support O -1 by Other Entities I Application Other Funding Soujoe I 460000) I I Acquisition I Rehabilitation (Construction I Assishnce Assisiance I pants I Last Fiscal Year I by Other I I I Services I Costs I ($0006) I Entities I (A) I (B) I (C) I (0) 1 (E) I (F) I (G) I (H) I (1) I W) I (K) i a) B---------------------i-----------------I I I - . ..... .. . � � -I I . .-II-.....-1- . -Ir------ . Competitive Programs .......... ........^ •....... •.... -. . .. . .. + ..... .,. . . �........... ......... . , `I` ......... ...zp. "1=••_„•_••, Continued 1..............r......».1.........i..............I..»..............1=...,......».,.I—........=.1............I..,,..««,.i.«.=....,1..........,I....................y....=...... ----------------------I-----------------I------I----------I------------1-----------I---------I---------1-------I------i--------I-----------r___I---------- 17. Rual Homeless I f I I I"""'«'•"•'I I:.........••1—...... 'I I I I Housing I I I I I'"==••,++•=••`7 I°"`"•..... """•",1 I I I ---------------------I-----------------I------I---------I-----------I----------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- 18. Sec.202 Eldtrty I.....................—I......... I I I I..........=.1,«......+,1 1....,.....,1 i ---------------------I-----------------I------I------I------------I----------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- 19. Sec.811 Handicapped I".....*............... *....**.-I I I I 1•••••••••... ........••1 ---------------------I-----------------I------I----------I------------I-----------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- 20. ModeatsFbhsbSRO 1..............»........1,.....=,I........„..,.1.,...,.»»»..»,,..1.,.r,,........ I......„...«1..•,......1.,......,1..........,1 I ---'---------------I-----------------I------I---------I------------I----—----I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- 21. RentalVouchers 1.......................1...==.=.I..............I.................i.............I 300 I....,»......I„•......rl.........1... ....»,».1 I ------------------I----------------'I------i----------I------------I------—---I---------I--------I-------I------I--------I--------------i-------- 22. Rental OartBcales 1.»..»..................I.........1,..,.........I......._.........I...............I 1,200 1«.,.........1....»»»=.,1.,.....,,1...,.......1 I ----------------------I-----------------I------I----------i------------I-----------i---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- 23. Public Housing I«......................I,..,,,..I I I I.r.,........1............1,»....... ,1.,....,..1,.....»,...I I Development I.......................1.......,1 I 1 I........... »...,.,,.,1...,...«,1...........1 I -----------------I-----------------I------I----------I----------I—---------I---------I---—----I-------i------I--------I---------------I---------- 24. Public Housing MROP I..............«_....... ....,....1.......»»...,-1 1,..........,...1............1=.,...,,»..»I........,,1........,1.........,.1 I -------------------I----------------I------I---------I---------I----------I---------I---------I------I------ -------- ---------------I--------- 25. Public Housing CLAP 1................».,.»..1........1............,I I..............-I.......,....I,..,........i•......»„1........,1.....».....1 I ---------------------I-----------------I------I----------i I-----------I----------I1-------I1---------1I-------I1------I1--------I1---------------iI---------- 28. DOE/Other Energy ...... ...... _ ,......., ........... Progame --------- I. ......... I I I . 1......... . I 1......., --------- I-----------------I------I----------I------------ ,1,........,.1 I....»...... ----------1---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I--------- 27. LIHTC 1.......................1.....,...1.,............I............,....1...............1............1............1.........,1........,1..,,.,...,.1 I ------------------- I-----------------I------I----------I------------I----------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- 28. F mHA I.....rr+++..rrrrr.rr...lrr.rr.r.I I I I I I........r,l...+„.«,I..........rl 1.rr...r+..r ----------------------I-----------------1------I----------I------------I-----------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I--------------I---------- 29. Lead-Based Faint I $12 I ......... 10096 1..«,...,,1 L...................,1.......,... Abatement 1 I 1—.... I L .....—..1............1............ 1 1..,....,,1 I................»...,1,.......... --------------------I----------------I------I---------I------------I----------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- 30. Omer I 6195 I I I I 250 I I I 100%I I I $20 1*,•••,••••. -------------------I-----------------I------I---------I------------1----------I---------I---------I-------I------i--------I---------------I---------- 31. Subtotal 1 $1,010 I.. ...rrl++r.....r..rrlr rr..rr.rr+++. .lrrirr..rr..vrl..........r1. »r»+n..l..r.r+..«r1...rrrrr,l........... $70 Ir.........r ---Competitive Programs I I....««,..I..=..........•I..............=».I...........,.,I............I.,..........1.....,...,1.....,.,,1.,.........1 I........... ---I-----------------I------I----------I------------I----------I---------I---------I------- I------I--------I---------------I-------- C. 32.Totel-Fodaral I x1,305 1,..,.....1.............1...,«..•..._.....1,........,,...•1...+,....=,.I........—.I,.....,.»,1.,.,,.,..1.,.........1 $438 i..,....,... ---------------------I-------------I------I----------I-----------i—---------I---------I--- -----I-------I------i--------I---------------I---------- 33.Total-Slate I $195 I......... I I I I I I I i I•,=....•..' -----------------I-----------------I------I---------1----------I-----------I---------I------- I-------I------I--------I---------------I--------- 34.Total-Local I $150 I..... =I I I I I I I I I I........••• -----------------I-----------------I------I----------I------------I----------I---------I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I---------- 35.Total-Private I 1*....—I I I I I I I I I I....--. ---------------------I-----------------I------I----------I------------I----------I------- I---------I-------I------I--------I---------------I--------- 38. TOM-Al Sources 1 $1,850 1...»....I.............1..=..........,,.,I....,.....«,«.1.......,....1............1...,.....,1.....,..,1......,....1 5498 I........... ----------------------------------------------------------------- l-------------------------------- Page 2 of 2 lorm HUD-40090-A 1,93) r� l CHAS Table 30 U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development Otfbe Of COOm rlity Planning and Development Goals for Households&Persons Comprehensive Housing Afforckibility Stategy(CHAS) to be Assisted with Hou shg Instruction s for Local Jurisdiction s --------------------------------- ------- --------------------------'-- Name of Jurisdiction: TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL 11991 --------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ ( Renters I Ovrrlers I I--------------------------------------------I--------------------------------I------------------------------------------------ I I I I I Itst-Time HomeGryas I I Homeless I Non- Taal Assistance Provided Elderly Small Large I I I--------'-------' ------------------ Homeless Section by kicome Group 1&2 Member Related Related I All Other I Taal I Exlstng I vdh I All I Taal I Individuals I Families I Special I Taal I 215 I Households I (2 to 4) I (6 or more) I Households I Renters I Horreowers I Children I Ohers I HorrI0aA arsj I I Needs I Goals I Goals I W I R I (C) I (D) I (E) I (F) I (G) I (H) I (4 1 P I K) I (Ll I (M) 1 (M --------------------I----------I--------I---------I--------I--------I---------I--------I--------I--------I---------I---------I--------I-------I---------- 1. Vary Low—Income 1 351 901 Sol 1 2051 1 I I 0 1 I I 1 2051 205 (o to305cdMFq• I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 -------------------I----------I--------I---------I--------I--------I---------I---------I--------I---------I---------I---------I--------I--------I---------- 2. Veryl-ow—Income I 10I 501 451 1 1051 I I I 01 1 I I 1051 105 (d1 to MF1)* I I I 1 1 1 - I I I I I I I I ----I-------I-------I---------1--------I--------I--------I--------I--------I--------I---------I---------I--------I--------I---------- 3. Other Low-Income I 141 1 I 1 141 5 1 25 1 I 30 1 9 1 I I 53 I 53 (51 to MC of MR)• I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----------I----------I---------I---------I--------I--------I---------I---------I--------I---------I---------I---------I--------I-------- I-------'- 4. Total Low—Income 1 591 1401 1251 01 3241 51 251 01 301 91 01 01 3631 363 (lnes1+2+3) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I --------------------------------- ------------------ ---------------------------------- on HUD adjusted income limits,if applicable. ---------------------------- Or based i CHAS Table 3B U.S.Department of Houshgand Urban Development Office of Community Planning and Development Goals for Hcuseh alas&Persons Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy(CHAS) to be Assisted with Hcu sing Instruction s for Local Jurisdiction s -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I------------------- Name of Jurisdiction: FY: I ORANGE COUNTY It9" --------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- 1 Renters I Owrlers I ----------------------------------------------I-----------------------------------i------------------------------=-------------- I I I I I Iist—TimeHomebuyers I 1 Homeless I Non— I I Total Assistance Provided ( Elderly I Small I Large I I I I----------------1 I-------------------I Homeless 1 1 Section by Morris Group 1 1&2 Member I Related 1 Related I All Other I Taal I Existing I wih I All I Taal 1 htlkiduals I Families I Special I Total 1 216 Households I (2104) 1 (5 or mare) I Households I Renters 1Homeowrlersl Chilciren I Otlars IH0meawrtersl I I Needs I Gods I Goals I (A) I (E) I (C) I (D) I (E) I (F) I (G) I (H) I (I I (JI) I K) I (L) I (M) I (N) -- -----------------I----------I--------I---------I--------I--------I--------I---------I--------I---------I---------I---------I--------I--------I---------- 1. Veryl-ow—Income i 30 1 501 301 1 1101 151 1 1 151 1 l 1 1251 205 (0 to 3D%of MFI)- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -------------------I----------I---------I---------I--------I--------I---------I--------i--------I---------I---------I---------I--------I--------I--------- 2. VeryLow—ncoma 1 101 501 451 1 1051 301 101 51 451 1 I I 1501 105 (31 to5o%of MFI)• ) I I I I I I I I I I I I I -------------------I----------I--------i---------I---=----I--------I--------i---------I--------I--------I---------I---------I--------I--------I--------- 3. Olher Law—Income 1 14 ( l I I 141 51 10 1 51 20 1 20 1 10 1 201 94 1 53 (51 to 80%of MFQ* I I I I I I I I I I I I I I --------------------I----------I--------I---------I--------I--------I---------I---------I--------I---------I---------I---------I--------I--------I---------- 4. Total Low—hcome 1 541 1001 751 01 2291 501 201 101 Sol 20 1 101 201 3591 383 pnes1+2+3) 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- • Or based on HUD adjusted income limits,if applicable C 1 I 042 B. PRIORITY ANALYSIS AND STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT. Priority: Facilitate the construction of up to 50 new units of rental housing affordable to very low and low income families. The Chapel Hill Comprehensive Plan states a goal of 35 new rental units each year affordable to very low and low income families. Priority will be given to projects with projected rents at or below those established for the Low Income Housing Tax Program, affordable to families with incomes below 60% of the area median, with at least three bedrooms. Analysis: There are a total of 9,932 very low-income households in Orange County earning from 0 to 50% of the area median family income ($0 - $20,800) . Very low-income renters are often forced to live in substandard housing due to the lack of affordable housing options in Orange County. Approximately 86% of households in the very low-income group reported having some housing problems.' An estimated 97% of large families in Orange County, and 91% in Chapel Hill experienced housing problems which can be attributed to the fact that many large, very low-income households, cannot afford the rental prices for an adequately sized unit, and are therefore forced to live in an overcrowded, substandard unit. Strategy/Investment Plan: Meeting this goal will require substantial local, state, and federal investment. The following programs and resources will be pursued over the next five years in order to meet this goal. A. Federal: HOME Single Room Occupancy (SRO) Programs B. State: N.C. Housing Trust Fund Small Cities CDBG Program Low Income Housing Tax Credits C. Local: Chapel Hill Housing Trust Fund D. Other: Federal Home Loan Bank Board Orange Community Housing Corporation Hillsborough Affordable Housing Corporation All local governments in Orange County will generally support applications for these programs and resources from eligible non- profits and other entities when funding becomes available. When necessary, the resident unit of local government will take the lead and apply directly for the funding. 6 A housing problem is defined as a household living in a unit: (1) which meets the definitions of physical defects, (2) that meets the definition of overcrowded, and (3) meet the definition of a cost burden greater than 30% of gross income. 33 043 Priority: Facilitate the construction of new or substantially rehabilitated housing units that are affordable to families below 80% of the area median. Projects that provide homeownership opportunities for families below 60% of the area median income. Analysis: All groups that have studied the housing need in Orange County agree that little or no opportunities exist for homeownership for families with incomes below 80% of the area median. The serious shortage of homeownership opportunities for low- and moderate-income families in Orange County has prompted the Town of Chapel Hill and Orange County to participate in two projects intended for first-time homebuyers. These two projects did provide homeownership opportunities to first-time homebuyers; however, even with special financing these projects did not reach far below 80% of the area median family income. Further, the cost of housing development in Orange County, specifically southern Orange County is a large contributor to the higher cost of housing development relative to neighboring counties . Project subsidies for land acquisition and site improvements can be provided to lower the production cost. Additionally, subsidies could be used for downpayment assistance for eligible first-time homebuyers. Strategy/Investment Plan: The following programs and resources will be pursued over the next five years in order to meet this goal. A. Federal: HOME Investment Partnerships Program B. State: N.C. Housing Trust Fund Small Cities CDBG Program C. Local: Chapel Hill Housing Trust Fund D. Private: Federal Home Loan Bank Board Orange Community Housing Corporation Habitat for Humanity of Orange County Knolls Neighborhood Development Association Other local non-profit housing corporations Local lending institutions All local governments in Orange County will generally support applications for these programs and resources from eligible non- profits and other entities when funding becomes available. When necessary, the resident unit of local government will take the lead and apply directly for the funding. Priority: Provide rehabilitation assistance for very low and low income homeowners and rental housing serving very low and low income tenants. Analysis: Countywide, the 1990 Census reported 10% of all housing units as substandard, or 3,610 units. Of these, approximately two (2 ) percent are considered not suitable for rehabilitation due to 34 044 their extent of deterioration. Many low and very low income homeowners cannot afford to make needed repairs to their homes, and deferred maintenance has created a need for homeowner rehabilitation assistance. This is particularly true for elderly homeowners in the County. Additionally, many rental units are also substandard thereby creating unsafe conditions for many of the County' s renters. Strategy/Investment Plan: The following programs and resources will be pursued over the next five years in order to meet this goal. A. Federal: HOME Investment Partnerships Program CDBG Entitlement Program B. State: N.C. Housing Trust Fund Small Cities CDBG Program C. Local: Chapel Hill Housing Trust Fund D. Private: Local Non-Profit Housing Corporations All local governments in Orange County will generally support applications for these programs and resources from eligible non- profits and other entities when funding becomes available. When necessary, the resident unit of local government will take the lead and apply directly for the funding. Priority: Provide assistance to households at less than 80% of median income to connect to existing public water/sewer systems . Analysis: There is a high incidence of homes with malfunctioning or failing septic systems and contaminated wells. An estimated 10 - 20% of the County' s septic systems are failing at any given moment. According to local data, there are approximately 500 households within an existing utility service area which are not connected to public service. Financial assistance with actual utility connection fees and associated plumbing costs is necessary to reduce this public health nuisance. Strategy/Investment Plan: The following programs and resources will be pursued over the next five years in order to meet this goal. A. Federal: HOME Investment Partnerships Program B. State: Small Cities CDBG Program C. Local: Chapel Hill Housing Trust Fund Other Local Revenue Sources Priority: To reduce the number of housing units without indoor plumbing. Analysis: In rural Orange County, many families still live with outdoor privies rather than indoor plumbing. In unincorporated Orange County, while land accessible to urban services is available, many existing residences lack adequate plumbing 35 O45 facilities. Actual data regarding the number of outdoor privies in the County are not available, the 1990 Census estimates that there are approximately 297 units without indoor bathrooms. Further, a 1989 report from the N.C. Rural Economic Development Center reports an estimated 1, 052 units without indoor plumbing. Any countywide housing strategy must address the need for attention to water and sewer problems of individuals since this item is often the associated with substandard housing conditions. Solutions to remedy this problem include connection to existing water/sewer systems, installation of wells and septic tank systems as a part of a comprehensive housing rehabilitation program. Strategy/Investment Plan: The following programs and resources will be pursued over the next five years in order to meet this goal. A. Federal: HOME Investment Partnerships Program B. State: Small Cities CDBG Program N.C. Housing Trust Fund Farmers Home Administration Community Services Block Grant C. Local: Other Local Revenue Sources Priority: Encourage the community to discuss and plan for a family shelter in Orange County as recommended by the Homeless Women and Children Task Force. Analysis: The Homeless Women and Child Task Force reported that homeless women and children are the fastest growing sector of the homeless population in Orange County. As of September 30, 1993, 147 women and 62 children received services at teh Inter-Faith Council ( IFC) Community House. Further, the Orange/Durham Coalition for Battered Women provided emergency and transitional shelter for 53 Orange County women and children. Many other women in our county slept in cars or on the streets and cannot be counted. The Community House rejects families almost daily due to the lack of space at the existing shelter. The IFC Shelter operates at capacity and no shelter exists in northern Orange County, creating a transportation problem for persons who may be employed in that part of the County. In addition, the current shelter must serve persons with very different needs, from single mothers with young children to single men recovering from substance abuse, within the same facility. Strategy/Investment Plan: In addition to assisting the Orange County Task Force on Homeless Women and Children establish a study committee, the following programs and resources will be pursued over the next five years in order to meet this goal. A. Federal: Emergency Shelter Grant Program B. State: N.C. Housing Finance Agency Programs C. Local: Local Government Revenue Sources 36 046 Priority: Create transitional housing units for shelter residents who can live independently. Analysis: A large number of shelter guests are persons new to the area seeking work; once they find employment, they still cannot afford to mb"ve" to permanent housing. Also, battered women often cannot afford to move from their homes into the private housing market. A transitional program would allow them to leave the shelter environment while having an affordable housing unit to help them save the funds necessary for rent and utility deposits . Such transitional housing may reduce the population needing services from the homeless shelter, especially those who can live independently but for whom no opportunities exist in the Orange County rental market. Strategy/Investment Plan: Federal, State and local resources will be inventoried to determine how programs may "mesh" to meet this goal. Priority: To assist local nonprofit human service agencies to provide a continuum of housing options for special populations, including older adults, disabled, mentally ill, and persons with AIDS. Analysis : Such a continuum would provide for a variety of housing choices, from unassisted living to small group homes, including boarding house-style living and other supportive settings. As local agencies identify needs, plan projects that could meet those needs, and locate state and federal programs that could fund those projects, local funds for housing could be used to meet matching requirements, to provide up-front planning costs, or to provide extra amenities or services not otherwise included in other programs. Strategy/Investment Plan: Federal, State and local resources will be inventoried to determine how programs may "mesh" to meet this goal. c. RELEVANT PUBLIC POLICIES. Orange County. Orange County enacted a density bonus for affordable housing in 1990, allowing up to 50% increase in density for developments that are all affordable and sold to qualifying low and moderate-income households. Other public policies generally do not have an adverse impact on the cost of housing. Chapel Hill. Within the designated urban services area, where access to employment, transit, day care, schools, and public utilities is located, the supply of vacant land is small and the price is high. In addition to the high cost of 37 047 plan preparation, processing fees, utility installation, street improvements, and lengthy review schedules all add to development costs. In Chapel Hill, the Town Council has responded by special accommodations for assisted housing development: waiving processing fees, expediting review schedules; and modifying street improvement requirements. Currently, the zoning ordinance provides a density bonus for rental projects that include units affordable to low-income families. As developers and non-profit organizations interested in housing development begin to identify the actual cost impact of local development regulations, the Town may consider subsidies or regulatory flexibility to encourage development of affordable housing. The Town Council has asked for special enabling legislation for inclusionary housing authority from the State legislature several times, the latest in Spring, 1993. To date, the Town has not been successful in these efforts. Carrboro. Carrboro' s zoning ordinance offers flexibility in the design of infrastructure, and includes a wide variety of allowable housing types, including mobile homes, modular homes, townhomes, and condominium developments. The review process is streamlined to avoid unnecessary delays, and the resulting supply of affordable units is relatively large. Hillsborough. Public policy for affordable housing in Hillsborough is in the process of being assessed by staff to determine the current situation and to compile a housing element to the Comprehensive Plan. While density bonuses are not provided for in the Zoning Ordinance, other regulations are supportive of affordable housing including numerous overlay and mobile home park districts that allow single-wide mobile homes. Also, double-wide mobile homes, duplexes, and modular homes are allowed in all residentially zoned areas including the Historic District. Site plan review for multi-family development is expedited by the use of consultants and approvals can generally be obtained in about three months. d. INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE. Important actors in achieving Orange County' s low-income housing goals are: Public Institutions a. Orange County Housing and Community Development Department - Responsible for administration of the Section 8 program for the County and for the CDBG small cities program. 38 b. Chapel Hill Department of Housing and Community Development Operates as the Town' s Housing Authority, operating public housing in Chapel Hill and Carrboro, and implementing the Town' s affordable housing program. c. Chapel- Hill Planning Department - Administrator of the Town' s CDBG entitlement program. Also, responsible for long range planning and policy design for housing development. d. Carrboro Planning Department- Houses the Carrboro CDBG small cities program and the Rental Rehabilitation Program administration. The Carrboro Planning Department is responsible for planning and policy design for housing development. e. Hillsborough Planning Department - Responsible for planning and policy development for the Town, including the recently-adopted 2010 plan. Non-Profit Organizations a. O range Community Housing Corporation - A nonprofit housing development corporation, whose operating budget is funded by Orange County, Chapel Hill, and Carrboro governing boards. OCHC is also a central clearinghouse for information about other nonprofits ' housing efforts, including Orange County Mental Health Association, AIDS Service Agency, local churches and other involved in housing assistance. OCHC is planning at least one housing development project each year. b. Orange County Habitat for Humanity, Incorporated - A strong local affiliate of the national organization. c. InterFaith Council for Social Service - Operators of the homeless shelter and chief advocates for the homeless population. IFC also offers a program to prevent homelessness through financial assistance to families that are at risk of losing their permanent housing. d. Orange Congregations in Mission, serving northern Orange County, offering programs that prevent homelessness through financial assistance to families that are at risk of losing their permanent housing, and proposing a 35-unit rental project in Hillsborough. e. Joint Orange-Chatham Community Action Agency, offering a wide variety of rehabilitation, weatherization, counseling, and financial assistance to very low income families. f. Pine Knolls Neighborhood Development Association, a non- profit involved in the construction of 20 housing units in the Pine Knolls neighborhood. 39 - 0-49 Private Industry a. Triangle Housing Partnership, a private non-profit corporation with support from local governments and the private sector in Wake, Durham, and Orange counties whose goal is to facilitate the creation of affordable housing opportunities through creating funding pools for debt and equity financing. b. Private lenders (especially those interested in achieving the lending goals of the Community Reinvestment Act) , public lenders like FmHA, builders, realtors, and developers, whose assistance will be crucial to the success of any housing initiatives undertaken in Orange County. c. Utility companies - develop construction and energy conservation standards to reduce energy costs. They also provide information and training on energy-saving practices in home, such as how to install insulation and weather stripping. Low interest loans are available from utility companies for the purchase and installation of insulation from utility companies for the purchase and installation of insulation, high efficiency heat pumps and other energy conservation measures. d. Many commercial banks have responded to the Community Reinvestment Act with programs to finance decent, affordable housing. Banks in Orange County with such programs include Wachovia, NationsBank, Central Carolina Bank, First Union National Bank, and Centura Bank, First Citizens and BB&T. These special lending programs are targeted to households that do not qualify for the lenders ' regular programs and may have rates slightly lower than conventional rates, lower down payment requirements or special underwriting treatment. Most organizations listed above work closely together on housing issues. Local government staff work with the non-profits on a regular basis, since most nonprofit activities are supported with local funds. Communication could be improved between housing development agencies and social service agencies that provide support and empowerment for families receiving housing assistance, a common concern addressed in the 1990 Act. COORDINATION OF RESOURCES. With the creation of Orange Community Housing Corporation, Orange County, Chapel Hill, Carrboro, and Hillsborough demonstrated the desire to cooperate among the several jurisdictions to provide the best housing assistance that will serve the low and moderate income residents of Orange County. With respect to coordination of resources, all agencies will continue our history of communication regarding projects in progress, applications submitted to state and federal funding agencies, programs that are particularly successful or troublesome, and other sharing of information and sources of funds. 40 050 - - - -- -- - e. PUBLIC HOUSING IMPROVEMENTS Included in the Attachment Section is a copy of the Chapel Hill Housing Department' s Five - Year Comprehensive Improvements Assistance Program Summary. f. PUBLIC HOUSING RESIDENT INITIATIVES The Town of Chapel Hill, Department of Housing and Community Development will continue to work with the Resident Management Corporation, Airport Gardens, to study the feasibility of selling the Airport Gardens apartments to public housing residents. Three of the public housing neighborhoods applied to HUD for a Resident Management technical assistance grant to provide training and assistance with the certification Resident Management Corporations. The leaders of the seven resident associations with elected officers comprise the Resident Management technical assistance grant to provide training and assistance with the certification Resident Management Corporations. The leaders of the seven resident associations with elected officers comprise the Residents ' Council. The Council meets bi- monthly at the Department of Housing and Community Development. The following topics, among others, have appeared on their agendas: forming a community watch (DARE officers) , organizing an anti-crime march, the Drug Elimination Grant proposal and the Public Housing Residents Empowerment Project. Trinity Court and Airport Gardens are the only associations with meeting sites available to them on their property so they have significantly more activities than the other associations . Other associations, however, still benefit from local agencies who bring their programs to the public housing communities - agencies including Cooperative Extension' s nutrition program and Planned Parenthood' s Minority Involvement Project. 41 051 ANNUAL PLAN, October 1, 1993 through September 30, 1994 During this Federal fiscal year, participating jurisdictions intend to use the following resources for carrying out housing assistance activities: 1 . CDBG Entitlement Funds (Town of Chapel Hill) in the amount of approximately $433, 000. For FY 1993-94, these funds are earmarked for: ( 1 ) rehabilitation and renovation of public housing; (2 ) neighborhood revitalization; ( 3) Economic Development; (4 ) Capital Projects. 2 . Funds from the McKinney Act Transitional Housing for the Homeless Program will be applied for during this fiscal year by Orange Community Housing Corporation and the InterFaith Council for Social Service. A 6-to-9 unit project is proposed, using existing housing stock and including supportive services for the residents who will be trying to move from sheltered to independent living. The proposal was considered this year, but delayed due to competing uses of the potential matching fund from the Town of Chapel Hill. If the Town continues its practice of allocating $150,000 for low-income housing, matching funds may be requested from the Town for the transitional project. 3. $105,000 in CDBG funds to acquire three structures for housing rehabilitation and transferred to the Pine Knolls Development Association to assist this organization in providing 20 homeownership opportunities. 4 . Operating support for Orange Community Housing Corporation (OCHC) includes $35,000 from Orange County, $50, 000 from Chapel Hill, and $10,000 from Carrboro. As a nonprofit corporation, OCHC can apply for and use funds for which local participating jurisdictions may not be eligible. 5 . Orange County and Carrboro will continue to submit applications for Small Cities CDBG Grants for Community Revitalization activities. 6 . The Town of Chapel Hill will use funds under the Comprehensive Grant Program of HUD for improvements to several public housing developments. The 1993 award was $300, 000 . 7 . The Town of Chapel Hill will provide a $90,000 construction loan to the Pine Knolls Neighborhood Development Association for their homeownership program. Two houses will be rehabilitated and sold to low income households. 8 . The Orange Community Housing Corporation will begin construction of a 50 unit rental complex known as Dobbins Heights in Chapel. 42 052 9. The Orange Community Housing Corporation will begin four first time homebuyers ventures. The first known as Magnolia Place, a planned 42 unit single family subdivision in Hillsborough; Abbotts Colony - five lots in this existing subdivision in Chapel Hill will be developed; Creel Street - two lots will be developed in cooperation with the Knolls Neighborhood Development Association; and lastly OCHC will administer a second mortgage program for families who purchase existing townhomes in the County. 10 . Habitat for Humanity will build four (4 ) homes for low income homebuyers. 11 . The Hillsborough Affordable Housing Corporation will begin construction of Whitted Forest - a 35 multifamily rental complex in Hillsborough. 12 . The Aids Service Agency will begin development of a proposed home for persons with AIDS in Carrboro. Monitoring Standards and Procedures I. Monitoring Plan--Orange County. The Orange County Board of Commissioners will serve as the monitoring agent for evaluating the success of the annual action plan. Staff will prepare a report for all local governments in Orange County and HUD describing all housing activities in the county during the previous year, relating each to this action plan. All agencies and organizations providing housing assistance of any kind will be requested to comment on the evaluation and help determine ways to improve performance under this CHAS. Monitoring Plan--Chapel Hill. The Planning Department will be responsible for the implementation of all housing programs and assistance within the Town of Chapel Hill. The Housing Advisory Board will serve as the monitoring agent for evaluating the success of the annual action plan. The Housing Advisory Board is a volunteer group of Chapel Hill citizens, including public housing residents, who advise the Town Council on housing issues. The Board will provide oversight for the implementation of the CHAS to insure that statutory and regulatory requirements are being met. 43 -7 71 n 77 77 J �r► I J U5 :s - ATTACHMENTS A. PUBLIC HEARING COMMENTS B. FIVE YEAR COMPREHENSIVE IMPROVEMENTS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM SUMMARY 44 054 SUMMARY OF CITIZEN COMMENTS From Chapel Hill Public Hearing September 20, 1993 I. General Suggestions 1. A one-page summary which explains the CHAS is and what its potential is needed. 2 . The Town should continue to fully fund a rehabilitation program. 3 . The Town Council should take a personal tour of each public housing neighborhood and determine firsthand what needs to be done to make their appearance both inside and out meet minimum standards. II. The Homeless 1. We need a homeless shelter for women and children. 2 . We need transitional housing for women and children coming out of the homeless shelter or the battered women's shelter. 3 . We need transitional housing for single people coming out of the homeless shelters. 4. Homeless facilities need grants for construction and assistance to operate. III. Public Housing 1. Current public housing should be maintained at the same level as is expected in privately owned apartment complexes. People living in public housing should not be expected to live in sub-standard housing. 2 . Public housing should not become a permanent solution. People who are able to pay market rents, with or without Section 8 aid, should be mainstreamed into private housing. 3 . If there are barriers to Section 8 recipients moving into mainstream rental units, those barriers should be removed. We need much closer supervision of landlords who accept Section 8 recipients, and of all landlords, than we have present. 4 . A former resident of a homeless shelter and now a volunteer at the IFC shelter said that she was appalled at some of the things she had to live with in Orange County. She said that the residents of the homeless shelter are mistreated, and that every effort should be made to find them homes. She also stated that if landlords accept Section 8 funds, they should be held responsible for health violations. Here health was violated and she cannot get her health back. She would like the Town to come together and build houses for the homeless. 055 2 5. A representative of the Residents Council claimed that living conditions need to be improved in existing public housing. The representative-said that insects, and in some cases, rats are a big problem. There representative also claimed that painting is needed inside and out, and that residents should be able to paint their own apartments at Public Housing expense, that better maintenance is needed, playgrounds are inadequate, smoke detectors do not work, and glass doors need to be replaced. A suggestion was that public housing residents should be hired to help contractors do the necessary work on their houses. 6. New public housing should be built as needed, but less will be needed if people are moved through the system 7. One citizen suggested that the Town put a ceiling on public housing rent and that the Council consider subsidizing low income homes because there are many people who cannot afford a $100, 000 home. IV. Housing for Low Income Families 1. Low cost, multiple family housing should be built that is not open to student penetration; one of the big problems in housing in Chapel Hill and Carrboro. 2 . One citizen spoke on behalf of the Pine Knolls Housing Development stating that it gives low income families a chance to own houses. 3 . A citizen commented that there should be more Section 8 housing, more safe, and more decent housing in a better living environment. V. Affordable Housing 1. Increase the housing stock of single family, detached housing, in a traditional subdivision for less than $100, 000. 2. The Town should pursue denser townhome developments. 3 . A representative of Orange County Habitat for Humanity said he has been working with Roger Waldon so that Habitat and the Town could move together. He said that property taxes are too high in Chapel Hill for a Habitat family to afford. VI. Housing Needs for Special Populations 1. A representative from OPC Mental Health Center stated that the majority of their clients can live independently with support services. The most important consideration is to have safe and • 056 3 affordable housing, and without this it is hard for these people to maintain a job. The representative also recommended that the Town could make reasonable accommodations, such as waiving development fees, and that the Council consider assigning a member of Town staff to work with OPC in developing housing objectives. 2 . A representative of Club Nova stated concern with adults with mental illness, claiming that the mentally ill deserve safe housing and must use Section 8 funds. There is major problem, many landlords will not accept Section 8 funds if it means renting to the mentally ill and this issue needs to be addressed. Finally, the representative stated that because rents are so high, and it is difficult to afford an apartment or house in Chapel Hill, that many of the mentally ill are forced to live in substandard housing. 3 . A citizen suggested that Section 202 should be looked at as an option for the mentally ill and homeless. Section 202 allows money to be borrowed and paid back in very small increments. 4. A representative of the OPC Foundation for Mental Health stated that the organization was created to promote and fund housing for the mentally ill. They have purchased 13 apartments behind Club Nova and one group home. The representative would like Chapel Hill to endorse a plan geared toward providing housing for the very low income and mentally ill or disabled. 5. A representative from Mandala, a non profit agency, stated that the goal of this agency is to build affordable rental housing for the very low income and elderly. Their efforts are geared to persons whose incomes range between $12, 000 and $30, 000 for two or more people. • 0547 11 ATTACHMENT 1 Summary of Funding Under the Comprehensive Improvements Assistance Program 1989 - $221 , 406 The 1989 funds were used to replace kitchen cabinets and sinks at Craig-Gomains and North Columbia Street neighborhoods ; to replace water valves at the Ridgefield neighborhood; and to replace roofs at the Airport Gardens and Pritchard Park neighborhoods. 1990 - $191. 360 The 1990 funds were used to make sewer repairs at the Trinity Court neighborhood and to make drainage improvements at the Airport Gardens neighborhood. 1991 - $1. 257 . 750 The 1991 funds are being used to replace siding, windows, stucco foundations, and repaint exteriors at Colony Woods West. At Trinity Court, repair work includes replacement of roofs , installation of ceramic tile on bathroom floors, replacement of windows, gutter, and downspout, installation of sidewalks, installation of chain link fencing, interior painting, replacement of kitchen cabinets and countertops, replacement of exterior doors and landscaping. Lead-based paint testing has been completed at Trinity Court and Craig-Gomains with 1991 Funds. • Also, funds will be used to construct a new maintenance building. 1992 - $12 . 540 1992 funds were used for lead-based paint testing at North Columbia Street, Ridgefield, Airport Gardens, Pritchard Park and South Roberson Street. 05S 12 ATTACHMENT 2a FIVE-YEAR PLAN PROJECTED COST ESTIMATES FOR PUBLIC HOUSING MODERNIZATION 1. Crain/Gomains Craig/Gomains neighborhood has forty (40) units of mixed bedroom size apartments located on Craig, Gomains, Bynum, Sykes and Edwards Street. The neighborhood was occupied in 1967 . Proposed improvements to this neighborhood include the abatement of lead based paint, replacement of water heaters, replacement of sewage and water lines, installation of washer hook-ups, replacement of bathroom tubs and fixtures, replacement of floor tiles, replacement of exterior and interior doors, installation of outlets near sinks with ground fault outlets and grading and landscaping to eliminate erosion and bare areas. Estimated Cost: $ 430 , 300 2 . Lindsay Street Lindsay Street neighborhood has nine (9) apartments located in three triplexes consisting of two and three bedroom apartments. This neighborhood was occupied in 1967 . Proposed improvements to this neighborhood include landscaping, replacement of doors, flooring, bathroom tubs and fixtures, installation of outlets near sinks with ground fault outlets, replacement of plumbing supply lines and sewage lines, replacement of water heaters and furnaces. Estimated Cost: $ 105 , 670 3 . North Columbia Street North Columbia Street neighborhood has eleven (11) apartments , consisting of one and two bedroom size apartments. This neighborhood was occupied in 1968 . Proposed improvements to this neighborhood include seal coating the asphalt parking lot, replacing concrete sidewalks, enclosing closet openings, and replacement of vinyl flooring, replacement of bathroom tubs and fixtures, installation of outlets near sinks with ground fault outlets, replacement of water heaters and gas furnaces. Estimated Cost: $ 68 , 750 13 4 . Trinity Court Trinity Court neighborhood has forty (40) apartments of two and three bedroom apartments. This neighborhood was occupied in 1975 . Proposed improvements include the replacement of the exterior wooden decking, replacement of circuit breakers and electrical wall heaters. Estimated Cost: $ 72 , 050 5. Ridgefield Ridgefield neighborhood has forty-four (44) apartments in a large mixed use development located on seven acres of land. These apartments were occupied in 1970. Proposed improvements to this neighborhood include the replacement of asphalt driveway/parking lot, landscaping, replacement of exterior and interior doors, replacement of vinyl flooring, replacement of kitchen cabinets, replacement of bathroom tub and fixtures, replacement of water and sewage lines, upgrading of electrical service, replacement of water heaters and furnaces, interior painting and lead-based paint abatement. Estimated Cost: $811, 000 6. Airport Gardens Airport Gardens neighborhood has twenty-six (26) units consisting of two and three bedroom apartments. This neighborhood was occupied in 1972 . Proposed improvements to this neighborhood include the replacement of concrete sidewalks, repair of retaining walls and catch basins, landscaping, replacement of exterior and interior doors, replacement of vinyl flooring, replacement of kitchen cabinets, replacement of bathroom tubs and fixtures, installation of outlets with ground fault outlets, and replacement of water and sewage lines. Estimated Cost: $352 , 540 7 . Pritchard Park Pritchard Park neighborhood has fifteen units consisting of two, three and four bedroom apartments. This neighborhood was occupied in 1972 . 060 14 Proposed improvements include landscaping, replacement of concrete sidewalks, replacement of drainage pipes, replacement of window sills, replacement of interior doors, replacement of vinyl flooring, replacement of kitchen cabinets, replacement of bathroom tubs and fixtures, replacement of sewage lines and washer hookups. Estimated Cost: $204 , 930 8 . South Roberson Street South Roberson neighborhood has fifteen (15) apartments reserved for elderly citizens. This neighborhood was occupied in 1972 . Proposed improvements include replacement of exterior doors, replacement of vinyl flooring, replacement of kitchen cabinet, replacement of bathroom fixtures, and replacement of electrical outlets. Estimated Cost: $123 , 840 9 . Colony Woods West Colony Woods West neighborhood has thirty (30) units located in fifteen (15) duplexes. This neighborhood was occupied in 1981. Proposed improvements include the replacement of exterior wooden decking, seal coating asphalt parking lots and driveways, landscaping, replacement of shingle roofs , replacement of range hoods, replacement of storm doors, replacement of bathtubs and fixtures, relocation of water heaters from crawl spaces and interior painting. Estimated Cost: $307 , 310 10. Eastwood Eastwood consists of thirty-two (32) two and three bedroom apartments in a mixed use duplex development. This neighborhood was occupied in 1986. Proposed improvements over the five-year period include replacement of interior doors, replacement of electrical outlets, installation of washer hookups, bathroom renovations, and Section 504 requirements. Estimated Cost: $ 32 , 590 061. 15 11. Church-Caldwell Street Church-Caldwell Street neighborhood consists of twenty (20) one and two bedroom apartments of elderly apartments. This neighborhood was occupied in 1986 . Proposed improvements work over the five-year period include landscaping, replacement of interior doors, replacement of range hoods, replacement of electrical outlets and Section 504 requirements. Estimated Cost: $ 23 , 390 12 . Oakwood Oakwood is located in Carrboro and consists of thirty (30) two and three bedroom size apartments. These apartments were occupied in 1984 . Proposed improvements work over the five-year period include landscaping, replacement of gutter and downspout, exterior painting, replacement of interior doors, replacement of floor tile and bathroom renovations. Estimated Cost: $ 82 , 900 13 . Management Improvements Proposed management improvements over the five-year period include improvements to accommodate the physically handicapped, replacement of equipment, architectural and engineering services, cost of relocation of residents, maintenance training and workshops, and personnel costs. Also proposed under management improvements are residents initiatives activities such as the cost of contracting with residents to maintain public housing grounds and clean vacant public housing apartments, and to provide a resident initiatives coordinator to implement programs and services given high priority by the public housing residents. Estimated Cost: $487 , 690 062 Executive Summary of u.s. Department of Housing ATTACHMENT 2b Preliminary Estimated Costs and Urban Development Physical and Management/ Office of Public and Indian Housing Operations Needs Comprehensive Grant Program (CGP) OMB Approval No.2577-0157(Exp.06/30/93) Public Reporting Burden for this tsdle bond it formation is estimated to average 10.0 horns per response,incasing d time for reviewing instruction,searchng erdsting data sources,gathering and rnaintairrng the data needed,and completing and reviewing the collection at 4darmadon.Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information.including suggestions for reducing this burden,to the Reports Management officer,Office of Ir formation Policies and Systems.U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development,Washington,D.C.20410-3800 and to the Office of Management and Budget.Paperwork Reduction Project(2577-0157),Washington,D.C.20503.Do not send this completed form to either of these addresses. PHA/iHA Name Federal Fiscal Year Chapel Hill Dept. of Housing & Community Development FFY 93 Development Number/ Total Total Preliminary Per Unit Exceeds Percentage Name Current Estimated Hard Cost Hard Cost Reasonable of Vacsn _ ___ _ Units Cost Unrts NC 46-1, Craig Gomains 40 $430,300 $10,758 No -- 2.5% NC 46-1, Lindsey Street 9 $105,670 $11,741 No 0.0% NC 46-2, North Columbia 11 $68,750 $6,250 No 0.0% NC 46-3,Trinity Court 40 $72,050 $1,801 No 0.0% NC 46-4, Ridgefield 44 $811,000 $18,432 No 0.0% NC 46-5,Airport Gardens 26 $352,540 $13,559 No 3,5% NC 46-5, Pritchard Park 15 $204,930 $13,662 No 6.7% NC 46-5, South Roberson 15 $123,840 $8,256 No 0.0% NC 46-6,Colony Woods West 15 $307,310 $20,467 No 0.0% NC 46-7,Eastwood 32 $32,590 $1,018 No 3,1% NC 46-7,Caldwell Street 20 $23,390 $1,170 No 5.0% NC 46-9, Oakwood 30 $82,900 $2,763 No 0.0% • Total Preliminary Estimated Hard Cost for Physical Needs $2,615,270 Total Preliminary Estimated Cost for PHA-Wide Management/Operations Needs $179,900 Total Preliminary Estimated Cost for PHA-Wide Nondwelling Structures and Equipment $11,000 Total Preliminary Estimated Cost for PHA-Wide Administration $39,950 Total Preliminary Estimated Cost for PHA-Wide Other $256,840. Grand Total of PHA Needs $3,102,960 Signature of Executive Director Date X Page 1 of 1 form HUD-52831 (2192) ref Handbook 7485.3 ATTACHMENT 2 RECOMMENDED 1993 - 98 COMPREHENSIVE IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM FOR PUBLIC HOUSING MODERNIZATION NEIGHBORHOOD 1993-1994 1994-1995 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 TOTAL (YEAR BUILT & N OF UNITS) AIRPORT GARDENS (1972/26) * 0 CHURCH/CALDWELL ST. (1986/20) 9,000 9,000 COLONY WOODS WEST(1981/30) * 0 CRAIG / GOMAINS (1967/40) 300 228,000 202,000 430,300 EASTWOOD (1986/32) 9,000 9,000 LINDSAY ST. (1967/9) 770 88,000 88,770 NORTH COLUMBIA ST. (1968/11) 770 770 OAKWOOD (1984/30) 100 100 PRITCHARD PARK (1972/15) * 0 RIDGEFIELD (1972/44) 232,000 272,000 250,000 57,000 811,000 SOUTH ROBERSON ST. (1972/15) 2,400 2,000 TRINITY COURT (1975/40) major renovation in process * 0 RESIDENT INITIATIVES 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 105,000 > ►-3 ACHITECTURAL -ENGINEERING 16,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 92,000 y FEES AND COST f1 MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENTS 72,060 51,000 73,000 38,000 33,000 267,060 M TOTAL 363,000 363,000 363,000 363,000 363,000 1 1,815,000 H w c� * Improvements are propn,ud in the Give Yee flan, but n()t IrCununendr'l due to anticipated lack (d (uuding evertlie Give - 064