HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 10-05-1993 - Agenda ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
P.O. Box 8181
HILLSBOROUGH, N.C.
27278
Moses Carey,jr. 732-8181
Alice M. Gordon 968-4501
Stephen H. Halkiotis 688-7331
Verla C. Insko
227-2031
Don Willhoit
644-3004 (Fax)
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
SPECIAL MEETING NOTICE
FOR
OCTOBER 5, 1993
AND
NOVEMBER 9, 1993
The Orange County Board of Commissioners will hold a work
session on October 5, 1993, at 7 : 30 p.m. in the Emergency Management
Training facility on New : Hope Church- Road in Chapel Hill. The
purpose of this meeting will' be to discuss, school :capital issues.
The Orange County Board of Commissioners will hold a work
session on November 9, 1993 -. at 7: 30 p.m. in the Emergency
Management Training facility on New Hope Church Road in Chapel
Hill. The purpose of this meeting will be (1) to hear a progress
report and discuss the EMS strategic plan, and (2) to discuss the
County pay plan.
The public is invited to attend.
Moses Carey, Jr. , Chai ,
Board of Commissioner//
8/17/93
YOU COUNT IN ORANGE COUNTY ! Irik
%Or
ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
P.O. Box 8181
HILLSBOROUGH, N.C.
27278
Moses Carey,jr. 732-8181
Alice M. Gordon 968-4501
Stephen H. Halkiotis 688-7331
Verla C. Insko
227-2031
Don Willhoit
644-3004 (Fax)
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
SPECIAL MEETING NOTICE
FOR
OCTOBER 5, 1993
AND
NOVEMBER 9, 1993
The Orange County Board of Commissioners will hold a work
session on October 5, 1993, at 7 : 30 p.m. in the Emergency Management
Training facility on New : Hope Church- Road in Chapel Hill. The
purpose of this meeting will' be to discuss, school :capital issues.
The Orange County Board of Commissioners will hold a work
session on November 9, 1993 -. at 7: 30 p.m. in the Emergency
Management Training facility on New Hope Church Road in Chapel
Hill. The purpose of this meeting will be (1) to hear a progress
report and discuss the EMS strategic plan, and (2) to discuss the
County pay plan.
The public is invited to attend.
Moses Carey, Jr. , Chai ,
Board of Commissioner//
8/17/93
YOU COUNT IN ORANGE COUNTY ! Irik
%Or
Board of Commissioners Worksession October 5, 1993
Schools
Summary of Handouts
Current Facilities Size, Capacity and 10th Day Membership 1
Current School Capital Policy 3
Tax Base Growth Compared to 1/2 Cent Sales Taxes Growth 4
Estimated Debt Service Payments - School Debt 5
Debt Service for School Construction/Expansion from PAYG
Based on Revenue from Impact Fees as Outlined in the Technical Report
% of Revenue from Impact Fees
as Outlined in the Technical Report
Option 1A. 100% 6
Option 1B. 75% 7
Option 1C. 50% 8
Option 1D. 25% 9
Funds Reserved from Pay-as-you-Go Allocations for Elementary 10
School (Copy of Appendix C from the 1993-98 adopted CIP)
Current Facilities Size,Capacity and 10th Day Membership
Member— Member— Member—
School Size Capacity* ship** ship** ship**
91—92 92-93 93-94
Orange County
ELEMENTARY "'
G.A. Brown 74;016 5 72: 521 531 517
Cameron Park .7:0;812 594: 565 546 621
Central Elementary 52,492 506; 467 479 472
Efland Cheeks Elementary 64;316 :572:!. 409 413 415
New Hope Elementary 100;164 ,.594::" 581 646 641
Y � 6:>80 >>;;?' `> >s'"83 : 2,543
TOTAL ELEMENTARY ;. 3 y, .0. ,. .2, ,, .,. 2,615 2,666
MIDDLE
A. L.Stanback 72,872."........ ........:;506;: 394 363 360
C.W.Stanford 1,07;620 726;: 807 898 956
TOTAL MIDDLE 1.80.,492 1;232: 1,201 1,261 1,316
Orange High School 213.,509 15118:" 1,376 1,449 1,489
TOTAL 755:;801. .> 3,588• 5,120 5,325 5,471
Chapel Hill/Carrboro City Schools ***
ELEMENTARY
Carrboro :; 67 537 607: 549 591 626
Ephesus ::z68 661:.;:;::::::; >::;::::;:::54,6;;; 435 568 613
Estes Hills 42,466 522: 514 511 575
Frank Porter Graham 60;968 584 530 584 634
Glenwood
43,435 ..475,: 419 424 438
Seawall 63'873_ .:..:,; .......608: 591 598 623
TOTAL ELEMENTARY 346;942 3,342::' 3,038 3,276 3,509
MIDDLE
Culbreth 112 847 .. 720. 769 844 880
.................................................0.::
Phillips ;::;103;251;::::;::::;:::::::::::;:;;:::;;:;::;:720:;; 746 782 792
TOTAL 6
OTAL MIDDLE 2'16,098 1 4;40:; 1,515 1,626 1, 72
....:............................:4i.
........... .........................................
.."...................................................
............................................."........
........... .. ...... ............ "..............
........... ... ..... ..............................
.............. ...... ......................... ..
......... .. ....................................
Chapel Hill High School »'s:253';928:;::;.:::::;:;<;>;: "1:';680.; 1,654 1,839 1953
TOTAL 816;96fi 5;462'. 6,207 6,741 7,134
***
Capacity as stated by the School System,
**Based on the actual membership as of the tenth day enrollment.
***Does not include Memorial Hospital enrollment
m:\history\10dayenro.wk3
1 _
Current Facilities Size,Capacity and 10th Day Membership
Yr to Yr Yr to Yr Cumulative
School Difference Difference Difference
91—2 to 92-3 92-3 to 93-4 91—92 to 93-4
Orange County
ELEMENTARY
G.A. Brown (19) 1 10 (14) (4)75 56
Cameron Park 12
5
Central Elementary 4 2 6
Efland Cheeks Elementary 65 (5) 66
New Hope Elementary
TOTAL ELEMENTARY 72 51 123
MIDDLE (31) (3) (34)
A, L.Stanback 53 149
C.W.Stanford 91
TOTAL MIDDLE 60 55 115
Orange High School 73 40 113
TOTAL 205 146 351
Chapel Hill/Carrboro City Schools ***
ELEMENTARY 77
Carrboro 42 35
Ephesus 133 45 178
Estes Hills (3) 64 61
Frank Porter Graham 54 50 104
Glenwood
14 19
5 24 32
Seawell
TOTAL ELEMENTARY 238 233 471
MIDDLE 75 36 11
Culbreth 1
36 10 11
Phillips
TOTAL MIDDLE 111 46 157
Chapel Hill High School 185 114 299
TOTAL 534 393 927
Capacity as stated by the School System.
**Based on the actual membership as of the tenth day enrollment.
***Does not include Memorial Hospital enrollment
m:\history\10dayenro.wk3
` 2 -
Current School Capital Policy
93-94
80% of Article 40 Sales Tax Funds 2,101,600
60% of Article 42 Sales Tax Funds 1,576,200
2 cents on the Property Tax Rate 864,000
$800,000 in Property Taxes 800,000
Less 1988 Debt Service (2,155,702)
Less 1977 Debt Service (580,050)
Total County for CIP Projects $2,606,048
PSBF 381,190
Total $2,987,238
- 3 _
Tax Base Growth Compared to 1 /2 Cent Sales Taxes Growth
25.0%
❑ 1 /2 Cent Ed Tax Base
21 .0%
20.0% - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
15.0% - - - - - - - - -
10.0% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8.9% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
7.4% 7.1 %
- - - - - - .-1-% - - - - - - - 3.4%- - ° - - - - - -
5.0% 2.7 /0
2.3% 1 .9% 1 .9%
0.0%
88-89 89-90 90-91 91 -92 92-93
G rowth
Estimated Debt Service Payments
School Debt
Millions
$10.0
❑ 1977 Issue 0 1988 Issue U11 1992 -$22m M 1992-$132m ❑ 1992-$16.8m
$8.0 $7.-9 $7.7
$7.4
$7.2 X6.9
� $6.7 $6.4
$6.2 $6.2
$6.0
$4.0
$2.0
\NMEN"
$0.0
94-95 95-96 96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01 -02 02-03
Option 1. A Debt Srv. for School Construction/Expansion from PAYG Based on
Revenue from Impact Fees as Outlined in the Technical Report
Report
A. Chapel Hill—Carrboro City Schools
mAcip\94-99\schools\elempayg.wk3 _ 10/04/93
Revenue m D E
A B C Debt Sr for Available to
PAYG Funds Impact Fees (1) Total Revenue !: School Constr./ Address Other
$750/dwelling (A+B) Expansion Capital Needs (C—D)
93-94 $1,668,902 $1,668,902 $1,668,902
94-95** 1,873,888 $588,375 2,462,263 $1,049,904 1,412,359
95-96 2,113,160 813,750 2,926,910 1,049,904 1,877,006
96-97 2,312,444 843,750 3,156,194 1,049,904 2,106,290
97-98 2,538,267 875,250 3,413,517 1,049,904 2,363,613
98-99 2,758,909 907,500 3,666,409 .: 1,049,904 2,616,505
99-00 3,031,724 941,078 3,972,802 1,049,904 2,922,898
00-01 3,251,711 975,897 4,227,608 1,049,904 3,177,704
01-02 3,484,360 1,012,006 4,496,366 :?'; 1,049,904 3,446,462
02-03 3,725,700 1,049,450 4,775,150 L 1,049,904 3,725,246
B. Orange County Schools
Revenue iii E
A B C D Available to
PAYG Funds Impact Fees (1) Total Revenue Estimated Address Other
$750/dwelling (A+B) COP Payment Capital Needs (C—D)
93-94 $1,318,336 $1,318,336 $1,318,336
94-95** 1,480,263 $307,688 1,787,951 $1,049,904 738,047
95-96 1,581,822 425,250 2,007,072 ?' 1,049,904 957,168
96-97 1,730,997 441,000 2,171 ,997 1,049,904 1,122,093
97-98 1,871,509 457,500 2,329,009 > 1,049,904 1,279,105
98-99 2,034,192 474,000 2,508,192 1,049,904 1,458,288
99-00 2,235,344 491,538 2,726,882 ii 1,049,904 1,676,978
00-01 2,397,544 509,725 2,907,269 1,049,904 1,857,365
01—02 2,569,080 528,585 3,097,665 1,049,904 2,047,761
02-03 2,747,024 548,142 3,295,166 I 1,049,904 2,245,262
(1) From technical report,June 1993. Amounts shown are one year in arrears.
(2) Debt is based on Certificate of Participation(COP)for$10,000,000 sold at 6.3%interest rate for 15 years.COPs can be
financed for up to 20 years.
**Impact Fee Revenue Received in 1993-94 adjusted to reflect 9 months of activity since construction already permitted was not required to pay
the fee. CO— C —
Option 1. B Debt Srv. for School Construction/Expansion from PAYG Based on
75% of the Revenue from Impact Fees as Outlined in the Technical Report
Report
A. Chapel Hill—Carrboro City Schools
m:\cip\94-99\schools\elempa75.wk3 10/04/93
Revenue D E
A B C Debt Sr for Available to
PAYG Funds Impact Fees (1) Total Revenue School Constr./ Address Other
$750/dwelling (A+B) 1 Expansion Capital Needs (C—D)
93-94 $1,668,902 $1,668,902 $1,668,902
94-95** 1,873,888 $441,281 2,315,169 $1,049,904 1,265,265
95-96 2,113,160 610,313 2,723,473 r 1,049,904 1,673,569
96-97 2,312,444 632,813 2,945,257 1,049,904 1,895,353
97-98 2,538,267 656,438 3,194,705 > 1,049,904 2,144,801
98-99 2,758,909 680,625 3,439,534 1,049,904 2,389,630
99-00 3,031,724 705,808 3,737,532 :< 1,049,904 2,687,628
00-01 3,251,711 731,923 3,983,634 .i 1,049,904 2,933,730
01-02 3,484,360 759,004 4,243,364 1,049,904 3,193,460
02-03 3,725,700 787,087 4,512,787 1,049,904 3,462,883
B. Orange County Schools
Revenue D E
A B C -3 Debt Sr for Available to
PAYG Funds Impact Fees (1) Total Revenue :il School Constr./ Address Other
$750/dwelling (A+B) Expansion Capital Needs (C—D)
93-94 $1,318,336 $1,318,336 $1,318,336
94-95** 1,480,263 $230,766 1,711,029 >.' $1,049,904 661,125
95-96 1,581,822 318,938 1,900,760 '': 1,049,904 850,856
96-97 1,730,997 330,750 2,061,747 ' 1,049,904 1,011,843
97-98 1,871,509 343,125 2,214,634 1,049,904 1,164,730
98-99 2,034,192 355,500 2,389,692 j 1,049,904 1,339,788
99-00 2,235,344 368,654 2,603,998 1,049,904 1,554,094
00-01 2,397,544 382,294 2,779,838 •'' 1,049,904 1,729,934
01-02 2,569,080 396,439 2,965,519 1,049,904 1,915,615
02-03 2,747,024 411,107 3,158,131 LL 1,049,904 2,108,227
(1) From technical report,June 1993. Amounts shown are one year in arrears.
(2) Debt is based on Certificate of Participation(COP)for$10,000,000 sold at 6.3%interest rate for 15 years.COPs can be
financed for up to 20 years.
**Impact Fee Revenue Received in 1993-94 adjusted to reflect 9 months of activity since construction already permitted was not required to pay
the fee.
- -2
Option 1. G Debt Srv. for School Construction/Expansion from PAYG Based on
50% of the Revenue from Impact Fees as Outlined in the Technical Report
Report
A. Chapel Hill—Carrboro City Schools
m:\cip\94-991,schools\elempa50.wk3 _ 10/04/93
Revenue D E
A B C Debt Sr for Available to
PAYG Funds Impact Fees (1) Total Revenue `z School Constr./ Address Other
$750/dwelling (A+B) Expansion Capital Needs (C—D)
93-94 $1,668,902 $1,668,902 $1,668,902
94-95** 1,873,888 $294,188 2,168,076 $1,049,904 1,118,172
95-96 2,113,160 406,875 2,520,035 h 1,049,904 1,470,131
96-97 2,312,444 421,875 2,734,319 ; 1,049,904 1,684,415
97-98 2,538,267 437,625 2,975,892 1,049,904 1,925,988
98-99 2,758,909 453,750 3,212,659 1,049,904 2,162,755
99-00 3,031,724 470,539 3,502,263 1,049,904 2,452,359
00-01 3,251,711 487,949 3,739,660 1,049,904 2,689,756
01-02 3,484,360 506,003 3,990,363 1,049,904 2,940,459
02-03 3,725,700 524,725 4,250,425 1,049,904 3,200,521
B. Orange County Schools
Revenue iiii D E
A B C Debt Sr for Available to
PAYG Funds Impact Fees (1) Total Revenue School Constr./ Address Other
$750/dwelling (A+B) Expansion Capital Needs (C—D)
93-94 $1,318,336 $1,318,336 : $1,318,336
94-95** 1,480,263 $153,844 1,634,107 $1,049,904 584,203
95-96 1,581,822 212,625 1,794,447 1,049,904 744,543
96-97 1,730,997 220,500 1,951,497 . 1,049,904 901,593
97-98 1,871,509 228,750 2,100,259 1,049,904 1,050,355
98-99 2,034,192 237,000 2,271,192 '> 1,049,904 1,221,288
99-00 2,235,344 245,769 2,481,113 1,049,904 1,431,209
00-01 2,397,544 254,862 2,652,406 ': 1,049,904 1,602,502
01-02 2,569,080 264,292 2,833,372 : 1,049,904 1,783,468
02-03 2,747,024 274,071 3,021,095 1,049,904 1,971,191
(1) From technical report,June 1993. Amounts shown are one year in arrears.
(2) Debt is based on Certificate of Participation(COP)for$10,000,000 sold at 6.3%interest rate for 15 years.COPs can be
financed for up to 20 years.
**Impact Fee Revenue Received in 1993-94 adjusted to reflect 9 months of activity since construction already permitted was not required to pay
the fee.
Option 1.D Debt Srv. for School Construction/Expansion from PAYG Based on
25% of the Revenue from Impact Fees as Outlined in the Technical Report
Report
A. Chapel Hill—Carrboro City Schools
m:\cip\94-99\schools\elempa25.wk3 10/04/93
Revenue g D E
A B C Debt Sr for Available to
PAYG Funds Impact Fees (1) Total Revenue s School Constr./ Address Other
$750/dwelling (A+B) Expansion Capital Needs (C—D)
93-94 $1,668,902 $1,668,902 '< $1,668,902
94-95** 1,873,888 $147,094 2,020,982 $1,049,904 971,078
95-96 2,113,160 203,438 2,316,598 1,049,904 1,266,694
96-97 2,312,444 210,938 2,523,382 1,049,904 1,473,478
97-98 2,538,267 218,813 2,757,080 : 1,049,904 1,707,176
98-99 2,758,909 226,875 2,985,784 1,049,904 1,935,880
99-00 3,031,724 235,269 3,266,993 1,049,904 2,217,089
00-01 3,251,711 243,974 3,495,685 1,049,904 2,445,781
01-02 3,484,360 253,001 3,737,361 1,049,904 2,687,457
02-03 3,725,700 262,362 3,988,062 1,049,904 2,938,158
B. Orange County Schools
Revenue D E
A B C Debt Sr for Available to
PAYG Funds Impact Fees (1) Total Revenue >! School Constr./ Address Other
$750/dwelling (A+B) Expansion Capital Needs (C—D)
93-94 $1,318,336 $1,318,336 ii $1,318,336
94-95** 1,480,263 $76,922 1,557,185 $1,049,904 507,281
95-96 1,581,822 106,313 1,688,135 • 1,049,904 • 638,231
96-97 1,730,997 110,250 1,841,247 .' 1,049,904 791,343
97-98 1,871,509 114,375 1,985,884 1,049,904 935,980
98-99 2,034,192 118,500 2,152,692 :: 1,049,904 1,102,788
99-00 2,235,344 122,885 2,358,229 ' 1,049,904 1,308,325
00-01 2,397,544 127,431 2,524,975 1,049,904 1,475,071
01-02 2,569,080 132,146 2,701,226 1,049,904 1,651,322
02-03 2,747,024 137,036 2,884,060 `! 1,049,904 1,834,156
(1) From technical report,June 1993. Amounts shown are one year in arrears.
(2) Debt is based on Certificate of Participation(COP)for$10,000,000 sold at 6.3%interest rate for 15 years.COPs can be
financed for up to 20 years.
**Impact Fee Revenue Received in 1993-94 adjusted to reflect 9 months of activity since construction already permitted was not required to pay
the fee.
— Q—
ill .-- Page C I
A
ON Appendix C.
Funds Reserved from Pay-as-you-Go
Allocations for Elementary Schools
Ill
OM1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 Total
Chapel Hill/Carrboro City Schools $81,859 93,795 403,032 538,776 491,041 $1,608,503
Orange County Schools $85,794 97,287 172,727 552,775 505,041 $1,413,624
Total $167,653 $191,082 $575,759 $1,091,551 $996,082 $3,022,127
ON
MI Both school systems have identified the need for additional elementary
school space. The Chapel Hill-Carrboro City School System estimates that
by the end of the decade, enrollment will support the need for two
that
additional facilities. The Orange
to County Sch a System estimates school
enrollment will increase to
for that district to open in FY 1997-98.
In this Capital Improvements Plan, funds have be
space aside e each reserve
account to address additional elementary P school
111 system.
1 To establish this reserve, pay-as-you-go a -as-you-go capital funding for the two school
im systems is frozen at the level adopted in the 1992-97 Capital Improvements
Plan. This two year freeze results in an estimated $358,735 in a reserve
account. This reserve could be applied toward debt service payments, if the
,1 om decision is made to finance additional school space through issuing debt.
the Board of Commissioners adopted an impact fee on all
In May 1993,
new residential dwelling units constructed (and permitted) after July 1,
1993. Because the number of new units tructe varies
veeue widely,
generated
estimate of the revenue is shown here. However,
from this impact fee will likely be used to address elementary school space
needs.
.,
The various options for addressing and financing elementary school space
will be discussed by the Board of County Commissioners in Fall 1993, in
I a special worksession.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
ORANGE COUNTY
MEMORANDUM
TO: BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
FROM: MOSES CAREY, JR.
VIA: BEVERLY
DATE: October 4 , 1993
RE: WORK SESSION TOMORROW NIGHT AT 7 : 30 P.M.
ATTACHED IS A LIST OF POSSIBLE ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION AT OUR
MEETING SCHEDULED FOR TOMORROW EVENING AT 7 : 30 P.M. IN THE EMS
TRAINING ROOM ON NEW HOPE CHURCH ROAD. THIS LIST OF POSSIBLE
DISCUSSION ISSUES WAS DERIVED FROM THE 1993-94 BUDGET FOLLOWUP LIST
WHICH IS ALSO ATTACHED.
PLEASE REVIEW THIS LIST AND FAX TO BEVERLY ANY PARTICULAR
ISSUES YOU WOULD LIKE FOR THE BOARD TO DISCUSS. WE NEED THESE IN
ADVANCE OF THE MEETING SO THAT STAFF WILL HAVE TIME TO PREPARE
BACKGROUND INFORMATION BEFORE THE MEETING.
THANK YOU.
Outstanding Issues - Schools
Capital
Funding policy of earmarking 80% of Article 40 of Sales Tax, 60% of Article 42
Sales Tax, $800,000 in property tax (netting out debt service for 1977 school bonds)
and the equivalent of 2 cents in property tax (2.3 cents prior to revaluation) to be
applied toward debt service.
_ Additional School Capital Funding Needs, including funding additional elementary
school space; financing options
School construction standards and classroom size standards - cost of new facilities
•
Operations
Strategy for budgeting funds for the Schools:
- Tie money with outcome - How effective is each new program?
-
What are the potential merger implications of new programs and other
funding issues such as pay supplements?
Definition of Continuation, Additional Continuation, Expansion
Definition of equity and recurring capital
.eii,wee/t/72,./ de_ 60 SC-4V / / yes //� d7 74
ex7.574 7. pdfic
•
2
1993-94 Budget Follow-up List •
August 1993
1. School Funding
Strategy for budgeting funds for the schools and information on the final budget: Tie
money with outcome - How effective is each new program? What are the potential
merger implications of new programs and other funding issues such as pay supplements?
(Board)
Disposition: The Board may want to consider a special worksession to deal with
the many issues surrounding school funding. Staff will request
that each school system submit a copy of their adopted budget
highlighting additional continuation and expansion items which
were funded.
School construction standards and classroom size standards (Commissioner Gordon)
Disposition: The School Issues Discussion Group to discuss and report back to
each of the three boards.
Definition of equity and of recurring capital (Commissioner Gordon)
Disposition: Staff recommends that this topic be included in the special
worksession dealing with school issues.
Fund balance for the schools (Board)
Disposition: Manager to work with the two Superintendents to review the
present policy for fund balance and report back to the Board any
recommended changes.
Impact Fees for Elementary School Space - Fee Collections, Appropriations, Reserve for
Affordable Housing (Board)
Disposition: Staff has identified funds from the Chestnut Oaks Project to be
considered as a funding source to reimburse the impact fee for
affordable housing projects. Planning Director will shortly be
presenting alternatives on addressing impact fees and affordable
housing. Staff is working with the towns to work out the
collection of the fee. Staff will develop a 10 year capital
improvements plan for the schools for the 1994-99 CIP to address
the Board's concern regarding the time necessary to accumulate
funds and disburse.
, / 3
/_ Additional School Capital Funding Needs (Board)
Disposition: Staff recommends that this topic, including possible new
elementary school space, be discussed in the special work session.
2. Emergency Medical Services
Feasibility of ringing down non-emergency calls to the appropriate responding
jurisdiction (Commissioner Halkiotis)
Disposition: Staff will implement a pilot effort to incrementally down load
certain non-emergency calls to the Sheriff's Department,
examining the work load and staffing impact. Staff and 911
Communications Group will monitor the program and report back
to the Board prior to the 1994-95 budget worksessions.
Educating the Public on the use of the 911 system (Commissioner Halkiotis)
Disposition: Staff and the 911 Communications Group will continue work on
this issue and report back to the Board periodically on progress in
this ongoing public information effort.
3. Animal Protection Society Agreement
Include in the written contract the licensing of animals and collection of licensing fees
as part of the adoption process (Commissioner Willhoit)
Disposition: Manager's Office and Health Director to incorporate a provision
in the contract between the County and APS for shelter services,
that animal licensing fees will be collected as an animal is adopted
from the shelter.
4. Tennis Courts at Orange High School
Include full funding for this project in the Capital Improvements Plan (Commissioner
Gordon)
Disposition: In order to accelerate funding for energy retrofitting projects,
$26,000 was borrowed from the tennis court resurfacing project.
Staff is to include the restoration of these funds as part of the
1994-99 Capital Improvements Plan.
i
� Y
k.
3 r�d`3
NN
gw,, x v s e w€ s m
3 � s.z.,;..w� L. "•g i a$ r'?,.z ,,
o
�xa
• Report on activities of the strategic planning
group to date
• Describe the thought process to be used in
making specific recommendations
• Dialogue with Commissioners to obtain their
input into the common vision for OCEMS
• Identify/discuss several recommendations the
group is prepared to make tonight
• Agree on next date for input to Board
Enuironmental Deuelop areas Outcome goal Resource Resource
Scan for outcome sub-committees identification allocation
goals
1 . EMS today 1 . Flow chart 1 . Identify
how it works what now resources
1 . Cardiac happens required to 1 . Reallocate
2. EMS tech- meet goals existing
nology today 2. Trauma 2. Identify resources
areas for 2. Identify
3. Broader 3. Peds improvement P, costs of 2. Allocate
society in resources new
which EMS 4. Mass 3.Propose resources
system casualty outcome 3. Make
functions goals and recommenda
measures -tions
Ongoing assessment and feedback
1 . Measure outcomes
2. Assess results
3. Make changes
h
Orange County
Commissioners
Orange County
EMS Rduisory
Council
Chr. Chr. Chr. Chr.
Steering TRRUMR PEDIRTRICS MRSS CRSURLTV CRROIRC
Committee S. ELLIOTT J. SMITH D. JONES B. STECKLER
Chr. DRTR
I, Well
Chr. RESOURCES
H. Caldwell
Chr. PUBLIC INFO.
B. Lockwood
I '3 I z �� � s' :ar,Fecy A� .��%`��s
is - � .a z s �� ♦ � t s x5 � � � � 2
S SIN. E
• Completion of work by individual medical
groups; final reports_ of cardiac, peds, and
trauma sub-committees done
• Identification and analysis of current
resources by the Resource sub-committee
• Recognition of need for a common vision for
OCEMS
• survey of Orange county citizens to obtain
their input into a common vision for OCEMS
• Work sessions held to begin integration of
the information and formulation of specific
recommendation as related to the vision
Y. .y
M:
. 0
M MON' 3 ? Y
LE
N1 �
hx.
p..............
E�E�
• PREVENTION AND PUBLIC HEALTH
EDUCATION
• TRAINING AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT
• EQUIPMENT
• COMMUNICATION
• INTEGRATION OF SERVICES
• EVALUATION AND FOLLOW-UP
• THESE MAY ALSO BE REFERRED TO AS
ATTRIBUTES OF AN EMS SYSTEM
..__........
2
s 'yR �'' a AL } F:� a^z {w,. ��,. vv$$�� .� sa h.;." 3 Q�.�.S.:s �� x �..��` �k '.',.r z gym" s� �fi 3' � ✓:d. .y; r, �.e x +a^.ysk': :s:�,.
� x �°�`� � �:,���Z�z� '<�x��+, 3.���•iyoz� ���� �E �� � s�'� .�a ���'� � sr g. "R£c ��' 2:`�'ms's
I Z
• FOUR MAJOR OBJECTIVES
— Determine level of citizen understanding of the OCEMS
system
— Determine the expectations which citizens of Orange
County have of their EMS system
— Determine trade-offs citizens are willing to make in terms
of cost vs. service
— Determine how citizens feel the EMS system can best be
funded
• DONE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SURVEY
RESEARCH UNIT OF UNC (PUBLIC HEALTH)
• TELEPHONE SURVEY; DATA COLLECTION
COMPLETED, ANALYSIS BEING DONE
4
k
• ABOUT 20 VOLUNTEERS COMPLETED THE
DATA COLLECTION PHASE
• ABOUT 850 TELEPHONE NUMBERS CALLED
• 204 SURVEYS WERE COMPLETED
• OVERVIEW OF RESULTS THUS FAR
• SCHEDULED FINAL REPORT:
7
r'Y£ hx^uxy �< +';"w''" rc rr�< xy d ':.:✓ 3 .r
b"00.41 " "0,4'��„?o.`£d•�,�s��' L'. .�"'�tt r��a�uR',',�P,.� °,��`v�.''w '�Sr �.n,`� �:P
w , '.a` z � ssa"*9 c,:I Sly ES F�Ac ECG 3 8
E
r x , , w p ..
b a a. : x x r:. >z 7 w v 3 3u c k t
j"All Alt
IVIt",
<: :
� "n
• How to get input from three groups into a
common vision
• How to integrate information from three
perspectives and arrive at recommendations
• How to evaluate recommendations relative to
impact on patient outcomes
• How to do cost/benefit analysis with limited,
subjective information
:
H E'
E'S WE,,
w THE:,S
DDRIM SS
• Each group did their version of a vision
statement
• Chairs of the three groups met and identified
common elements across groups
• Arrived at major elements of a vision
statement
• Related common and unique
recommendations from sub-committees to
vision elements
• Related recommendations to potential impact
on patient outcomes
7>ti twxy �a: z
a :s:� us..:�* � �� sx
• Devised ways of looking at cost/benefit with
limited, subjective information
• Defined and drew a system diagram to aid in
Y g
the understanding of relationships between
various elements of the system
d
SYSTEM D ! RGRRM OF EMS
0 RTR ---------
COLLECTION
1) Morbidity and
PREVENTION mortality stats
2) Surueys of
patients IDENTIFY
3) Other data GRPS
CITIZEN `�RESOLUTI ON
MED I CRL OF PROBLEM
NEED IWatient
satisfaction
2)Physiological
outcome
RDJUST
SYSTEM
EFFECT ON
PRTIENT
OUTCOMES
M
a3 � gc y s
E,
' CDST/R� NE
..........
I
:: �^ �,�
NUMBER OF PEOPLE AFFECTED
Low Medium High
Low
COST Medium
High
r
ALYS
ERA
-_ -.N F $w
J...............
IMPACT TO PATIENT OUTCOME
Low Medium High
Low
COST Medium
High
Jf
"loom' rff ra
K.ATO ..�� 5;,, �'3': �2 �z,�:�3 � ra "� ��rs�'��S"j#s,$
;E:!!�
csr v� � �tavn z v '
[ 3 s _ P✓, ',':u
..........
PATIENT OUTCOMES
Physiological Patient Attributes EMS is/wants to be
outcome satisfaction
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Prevention &
Public health
Training
Equipment
Commuication
Integration of
services
Evaluation &
Follow-up
J-14
u„
v rN ', `�r." r y7 s ,y`�.:`Y"a ax:.tg'` ''• ,,, x n' ' c s '' s 'k'x rt E y s. �'\»$` - :
zr Y
• PREVENTION AND PUBLIC HEALTH
EDUCATION
— Appropriate use of 911 system resulting in a decrease in
the burden on the system
>> Physician office training to prevent delay in cardiac
care
>> Provide peds 24 hour "Hot line" for referral of
problems other than true emergencies
TRAINING
— Involve all levels of the system (First Responders,
communications/dispatch, EMT's, ER)
>> Recruitment, coordination, and enhancement of First
Responder training and system
>> Additional training in peds skills and pre-hospital
care to increase confidence and competence of
infrequently used skills
lllulll•" '2'^. : 1 . / � ' 3 '.! F C: i zr.C�a ^T r8 xr r d'/^ ..T^
1�,�s. y.���5 � � srE' �.� u.� ::s,£ §'.x� ,� atmr 3 a��,.os r e $� � ✓t ?`a y`
� A _� f S G ��.�� � k" yd,a'.•,� ""5. "�,A X'" ^a� H� ry.��•'�� '. iRy:.
,
�
p����.�►�i"�x"�'� ysSr' x ^+f'��,eA����'°� Y���S
c er a a �'A rte x y i .�3 se �a av r R 4�2'av�f `�k' ���w�J Y`� �` 3" ;�9c'`'. � L� ra�,. s .��c s >�.•��_ ..,,..�
h 7;� 1 > 5 Ya xJ "�` a �` f�L'i •"e'�"�e. zkY'@s"' z 4 X: ova Sc z 11 � a t ,�
k� � C s s i.:,, e S�� ��,,.r � � ::} � .�. K, ✓�<S��a���3����' \ as.� c,a :�� �` Lai °.�k�'r b��,�', '�%`�� r z �� :
" � ��' s• W` �'S:� .c^�-a9i,�'%�i'� Y' �'�'.a�^`'a�..�'„'�sr a std r�`�u� k: aY �.� ', a �, y: r� Yr� s� s c��.`�. � �rzr c�
ki n m:<6 x�a�l;. �,risa �' �vvr s, �..s R:,t&'¢ �s x�., ��. {, an,, °� �>�:a Fa �� •�.yx"a 37 n. ^k�;.,,� vxy,� �r"r�,x s!� ``&'s,.�. &
v.& .r�:.�:`.�z`a,.k«`.".3'»a�MVa.�S��e..�'��,rs ...[:y.�`.��i..`¢�`�„y�a��`�..��>?"^�'�.'",d."'. "i' �%•"a3� ,3�, :"�•�,. ���` �;rtt'.�� ��Yk�;�..:�.,n�'�.17'�^.?"���n`�".��a�;..l�� �`:�.rs� M'"���6?4:E�''r°."G•;,��is.•<:
• EQUIPMENT
— Tiered system with ongoing re-evaluation of personnel,
equipment and locations
Appropriate (standardized) equipment for First
Responders--AED's, # of pieces of equipment,02,
radios, maps, etc.
>> Purchase and maintain specific peds equipment for
vehicles and for ongoing training
• COMMUNICATION
— Institute pre-hospital thrombolytic therapy screening
questionnaire
— Expand peds protocols, consider moving toward more
field decisions with peds care to reduce time loss
— hands free communication devices
• INTEGRATION OF SERVICES
— Integrate EMS with Human Services agencies in grange
County (Health Dept., Social Services, etc.)
s
1���7/�
z, ;Fk � �a'r�`� a> 'Zh YCN '.� :3. �' w ����:N�•`xi" iOs 2.'�""'�f �Y S i
• Evaluation and Follow-up
— Upgrade the EMS Council to a major decision making/
recommendation-making body to the County
Commissioners to 1) Establish follow-up and evaluation
of this strategic planning effort 2) Evaluate
recommendations concerning the evolution of the EMS
system, and 3) Periodically assess the overall
effectiveness of the service and provide input to
Commissioners
E
ikV
IRK
x a',am,
My,A,0,5
6 •E Y
x3k�y 3 '���is,,�:f ����,3x � :�
n a
Z N
• EMS NEEDS TO BE INTEGRATED WITH
OTHER HEALTH RELATED SERVICES
WITHIN THE COUNTY
• EMS ADVISORY COUNCIL ROLE SHOULD BE
EXPANDED
• CURRENT EVALUATION METHODS ARE
VERY SUBJECTIVE; THERE EXISTS A NEED
FOR RESOURCES TO BEGIN WORKING
WITHIN THE TOTAL EMS SYSTEM TO MAKE
EVALUATION EFFORTS MORE OBJECTIVE