Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 10-04-1993 - III-I 1 O R A N G E C O U N T Y BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: October 4 , 1993 Action Agenda Item # 32".." SUBJECT: CLEARVIEW - PRELIMINARY PLAN ACTION BY: November 18 , 1993 DEPARTMENT: PLANNING & INSPECTIONS PUBLIC HEARING: Yes X No ATTACHMENT (S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Cameron Extension 2580 Resolution of Approval Application Vicinity Map Preliminary Plan Fiscal Impact Analysis TELEPHONE NUMBERS: 9/20/93 Draft Planning Hillsborough - 732-8181 Board Minutes Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 967-9251/968-4501 PURPOSE: Consideration of the Preliminary Plan for Clearview Subdivision. BACKGROUND: The property is located in Cheeks Township on the north side of West Ten Road (SR 1144) 2000 feet east of Buckhorn Road (SR 1114) and south of Interstate 85/40 . In the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan, the area is designated as Twenty Year Transition in the Commercial-Industrial Activity Node. It is in the Upper Eno Watershed. Current zoning is Residential-1 and Protected Watershed II, with a small portion in the Major Transportation Corridor. Adjacent land uses are agricultural and residential . No traffic count information is available for this portion of West Ten Road. The total acreage of the tract is approximately 35 . 7 acres. The applicant proposes to create thirty (30) lots on a new public loop road to be developed in three (3) phases. Most of the lots are 40, 000 square feet in size. Six (6) lots are approximately one acre each. Two 2 . 5 to 3-acre lots are located at the northern end of the subdivision. The proposed lots will be served by individual wells 2 and septic tanks, with the exception of lots 22 and 25, which shall have easements for sewage disposal - located on lots 23 and 24 . The stream that flows northeast across the northern portion of the subdivision is intermittent; therefore, a stream buffer is not required. Lots 23 and 24 are proposed as flag lots with a joint driveway crossing the stream. Construction of the joint driveway will be included with the improvements required for final approval of Phase C. On September 20, the Planning Board unanimously recommended approval of the Preliminary Plan. RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan for Clearview Subdivision with a public road built to State standards and the conditions contained in the attached Resolution of Approval. RESOLUTION 3 OF THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Date October 4, 1993 Name of Subdivision Clearview Owner/Applicant Don Collins The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves Clearview subdivision Preliminary Plat, dated July 19, 1993 and containing 30 lots, subject to the fulfillment of requirements specified herein. All roads shall be irrevocably dedicated to the general public and be constructed to standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. The approval of this resolution authorizes and directs the Orange County Manager to accept for Orange County and on behalf of the public generally, the offer of dedication of Preston Loop. This acceptance by Orange County of the dedication to the general public of Preston Loop shall be without maintenance responsibility. These roads shall be maintained by the owner/applicant until such time as they are accepted for maintenance by the North Carolina Department of Transportation or some other governmental body. Before the Final Plat of any phase of Clearview can be recorded: A. Sewage Disposal, 1. Each residential lot except lots 22 and 25 shall contain an adequate area for septic disposal, and repair area, approved by the Orange County Division of Environmental Health. 2. Disclosure that the septic system location may restrict the size and location of improvements. This disclosure shall be included in a document describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. The document shall also disclose that information regarding the tentative location of septic systems is available from the Orange County Health Department, Division of Environmental Health. 3. Septic easements shall be provided for lots 22 and 25 by lots 23 and 24 as indicated on the Preliminary Plat. The installation of septic systems for lots 22 and 25 shall be subject to conditions contained in Improvements Permits issued by the Orange County Division of Environmental Health. The easements and their conditions shall be contained in the development restrictive covenants or other documents. A reference to the restrictive covenants shall be included in a document describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 4 B. Roads and Access 1. Preston Loop shall be constructed to standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation, within a 50-foot right-of-way, and the construction shall be inspected and approved by NCDOT. OR A letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond shall be submitted to secure construction of Preston Loop to the standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. An estimate of the construction cost must be prepared by a certified/licensed engineer or grading contractor and submitted to the Planning and Inspections Department. The financial guarantee must reflect 110% of that estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina. The document describing development restrictions to be recorded with the Final Plat shall state that the financial guarantee will not be released until the road construction has been inspected and approved by NCDOT. 2. The joint driveway serving lots 23 and 24 shall be constructed from Preston Loop to the north side of the drainage easement prior to the Final Plat approval for Phase C. OR A letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond shall be submitted to secure construction of the joint driveway. An estimate of the construction cost must be prepared by a certified/licensed engineer or grading contractor and submitted to the Planning and Inspections Department. The financial guarantee must reflect 110% of the estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina. The document describing development restrictions to be recorded with the Final Plat for Phase C shall state that the financial guarantee will not be released until the driveway construction has been inspected and approved by the Planning and Inspections Department. 3. An erosion control plan for construction of the roads shall be submitted by the applicant for review and approval by the Orange County Erosion Control Division. 4. Lots 23 and 24 shall access Preston Loop via a joint driveway as shown on the Preliminary Plat. All lots shall access onto the new subdivision roads. These restrictions shall be stated in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 5 5. Approved street name signs shall be erected at the intersection of streets as required in Section IV-B-3-c-12 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. Evidence shall be submitted by the applicant that the sign is in place or a copy of the receipt for purchase of the sign shall be submitted to the Planning Department. 6. Dedicate an additional five (5') feet of right-of-way along West Ten Road (SR 1144). C. Land Use Buffers and Landscaping 1. On the landscape plan, provide six (6) additional trees in the side and/or rear setbacks of lot 15. 2. Landscaping shall be installed or preserved as indicated on the approved landscape plan, and must be inspected and approved by the Planning and Inspections Department. OR The applicant shall secure landscape requirement installation and preservation through a letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond. An estimate of the cost for required preservation, plantings and their installation must be provided. The financial guarantee shall reflect 110% of the estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina. 3. Provisions for protection of existing trees as shown on the approved landscape plan shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 4. A Type A Land Use Buffer shall be provided along the new right-of-way for West Ten Road (SR 1144). The buffer shall be 30 feet in width and provide sufficient vegetation to meet the standards of Section IV-B-8-e of the Subdivision Regulations. Said buffer shall be so noted on the plat, and described in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. D. Drainage 1. Impervious surface data, as pursuant to Article 6.23.4 of the Zoning Ordinance shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 2. Indicate a 50-foot drainage easement along the intermittent stream in Phase C. Locate additional drainage easements as required following review and approval of the Erosion Control Plan. E. Parkland 6 1. Cash in the amount of $1,590.00 ($1,919.73/acre x 29/35 acre) shall be paid to Orange County as payment in lieu of parkland dedication. F. Miscellaneous 1. The Final Plat shall contain a title block and vicinity map in accordance with Section V-D-2 and V-D-3 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. 2. The following natural and man-made site features shall be shown on the plat: (Include streams, rivers, ponds, lakes, swamps, marshes, sites in "Inventory", houses, barns, sheds, railroads, overhead utility lines, cemeteries) a. Intermittent stream in Phase C. b. Barn on lot 17 (if it is to remain). 3. The following easements shall be shown on the plat: a. Septic line and field easements to serve lots 22 and 25. b. 30-foot joint driveway easement to serve lots 23 and 24. c. 50-foot drainage easement on the intermittent stream. 4. A setback of 40 feet shall be maintained as measured from the edge of right-of-way of Preston Loop and West Ten Road. Side yards shall be a minimum of 20 feet, and rear yards a minimum of 20 feet. These setback requirements shall be stated on the plat, and in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 5. All lots shall meet minimum lot width requirements contained in the Zoning Ordinance. G. Certifications 1. A Certificate of Survey and Accuracy signed by a registered Land Surveyor shall be notarized on the face of the Final Plat. 2. A Certificate of Declaration and Maintenance in the form provided in Section V-D-6-b of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations signed by the landowner and developer shall be on the face of the plat and included in a document describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 3. The Department of Environmental Health shall certify that lots 23 and 24 contain easements for lots 22 and 25 of sufficient area for septic disposal and repair and that all other residential lots contain sufficient area for septic tank disposal and repair. i . 5/ / 4. The North Carolina Department of Transportation shall certify that Preston Loop has been constructed to State standards or that construction plans have been approved. 5. A Certificate of Approval signed by the Orange County Planning and -----� Inspections Department. 421— _- (1. (/,=17-i-_____, _ ...-- 4:0_. „____.:, . / .„0", ..../...„0- ___ i C----� Signature of Applicant Cl-. to the Board 't I, ./67. . _ 0 __. , accept the above listed conditions of subdivision approval, and acknowledge that each must be met prior to recordation of the final plat. / -z / 3 Applicant Date , MAJOR SUBDi . ISION 8 . 0 RRN6E COUNTY fi 7 — 1 9 -93 a "j j DATE: 7/19/93 PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT OINK ONLY) SUBDIVISION NAME: CLEARVIEW LOCATION: West Ten Road, Cheeks Township OWNER/DEVELOPER: Don Collins ADDRESS: 4311 Old Chapel Hill-HillsborTELEPHONE NO.: 967-6813 Hillsborough kXCONTACT: ENT Land Survey=s , Inc TELEPHONE NO.: 732-6262 Steve Yuhasz A. SUMMARY INFORMATION: Orange County Tax Map 28 Block - Lot(s) 55 Township Cheeks Zoning District(s): R-1 /PW II • Total Number of Acres: 35 . 7 Phases: 3 Total Number of Lots: 30 Average Lot Size: 1 . 1 Minimum Lot Size: 0 . 92 Number/Type of Structures: (existing) None (proposed) Single Fami 1 v Lineal Feet in Streets: 2500 Acres in Open Space: n/a Water Supply: Public (specify) Community X Individual Wastewater Disposal: PubLic (specify) Community X Individual School District: Fire District: General Land Uses in Area: Agricultural /Residential Critical Areas: X stream/drainageways flood prone areas 1 watershed (specify) historic sites other (explain) Is the property to be subdivided currently under "farm use value taxation"? Yes No If "yes", please contact the Orange County Tax Office. Subdivision of the property may require payment of deferred taxes under "farm use value taxation'. E. All plats must be submitted on sheet no smaller than one inch equals two-hundred feet (1"=200') and no larger than one incn equals twenty feet (1"=20') and must contain the following information: W. subdivision name X _ zoning of tract and adjacent properties X, 'S` name & address of owner(s) X building setback lines oy notation or typicaL :... N name & address of subdivider >�� : layout C ' (if other than owner) X ;; N V .;;:?i location and width of existing and proposed E X - '' name of surveyor, engineer, < easements (drainage, utilities, roads, etc.) " : Landscape architect or architect, X .# o p `•` existing, proposed and adjoining •rights-of-way ._ M address, registration t and seal including dimensions and street names and state Z X , (title) Preliminary Plan M road numbers. Lineal feet of road centerlines and X scale, north arrrow � %;:>;;:: approximate acreage of new street rights-of-way ;. X date (including revision dates) I?//a> existing and proposed utilities, including type, 9 `c X `• township, tax map-blocx-Lot :;i : sizes, hydrants, valves, manholes l'....;%.: references • n a 'l--- •existing and proposed curbs, gutters and culverts, :; X Parer: Parcel Identification P HE including sizes and graces V; h `^ deed wok anc page r of property n/a location and width of alleys, sioewatks, bike Lanes, TO be subdivided transit systems, and bus stocs ,.please comotete reverse sloe: mounca-` Oes.'1 Dec ..1T Dea^,n_s v :yo ca', strre: cr05° so: Ong anc .:P'ceCtt ' an: c:s:ance!., oetalts inclLc n Oes.cr anc rlcrr _ ?vC .a• arm J tots, acreage c- ;ne tract anc snoutoers acreage of lots, tnc:using anc J ho n zontat aI gnmen: ano general curve cats (c,:c::_ exctuoinc area uttnln rights-Of-way `' roans) X control corner 5 centerline radius on all proposes streets X ,/ proposed lot lines with dimensions n a ``y :: permanent features suer, as puilaings, cemeteries, X lot E. block numbers %> historic landmarks X phasing tines X ? >< adjoining Lot layout names of adjoining property X topograpny at ten foot (10) intervals Ma owners. If subdivioed, suodivision plat name, plat x water bodies, streams, fl000way anc book S page nurroer, and perimeter lot numbers. floodplains X > lanascaping and buffer requirements X ' :. stream buffers n /a township, corporate and extra-territorial planninc n/a :;;: :5 location anc size of parcels dedicated jurisdiction lines union cross the property tor public use recreational use or n/a ?;:: location and size of lots of restrictee Development reserved in common, with purpose notec .....,• _ potential anc notation on plat regarding same X :::: impervious surtace aata (if located in X stormwater Detention and/or retention sites anc water supply watersned) unaisturpeo areas for infiltration purposes (i` 7. X V >. vicinity map showln° general location located in water supply watershed) '..._._.. of subdivision with streets and roaos k7lt�+a identified by State road number and 11 ,� name yr5 10t1011� q(O 0IJb rne OTHER. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS J . Twenty-five (25) copies of the preliminary plat. ,.12. One full size copy of an Orange County Tax map (with tax parcels involved clearly marked in pencil). 3. Where municipal or OWASA sewer is not available, a copy of the Preliminary Plat indicating Health Department soils analysis approval/denial for each lot shown thereon. Where a private road is proposed a written statement by the applicant or his/her authorized representative which sets forth the justification for a private road (see Section IV-5-3-d-; of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations). 9A 5. Auxiliary documents, in craft form, prepared in accoraance with Section VI of this Ordinance Lillian assure completion and/or maintenance of irrorovements required by this Ordinance. Such documents may incluae, but nor be limited to, a private road maintenance agreement, and articles of incorporation anc restrictive covenants pertaining to a homeowner's association. These cocuments may be required as necessary as evidence that the ordinance requirements are being met. .k. Fee - 5350.00 plus 55.00 per lot (; fee for preliminary and final plat). -h ,apolicant, hereby certify that the foregoing application is c fete and accurate. Ara / r APF .ANT'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S SIGNATURE ...._ 7( 3 OATS DATE • /. (7(' ---• ;r.ur.: L Date �a:c • / ( 1 <eceip: = 9 • O - 10 ati 9e —111 VOW' • t • '' { 1,TK CIL lu Y/ 1 • I _ o mow,.. 0 . N > ��..� C L4RV1 E W 7 I, ,; — APPLJCAxIT: DOI�JCOLLIJ S 4 + ,= ' ,..•:..,..., r)� Z O tai 1 M G : F�—1/P W IL/MTC �+ r, ::4%.l..t..c � 4TKG,L COMPZEI4 4JSIVE PLA,Q 11 , gr..— . 3 K` 20- YmArz rizd�{slr;oti ►�. SOH M E. .C1 1 k1pu5Tel4 L,NODE ..il rl N',1 RI HI � I�S'�1,t �1,.n 'pC1il ® (r,? .473 _ , "- ; rf) ,o e rr ra ® IIf.�1 ,7 a n K GU •°. I L1J © ) f a1 r�I sac c.. I 1141 �® r� Jam` , .i .r ..: _ 61111111r 1 1- -- -... 1 , - _ -----— ----- __ I. .1 . i '.._---:\--1. . .i --;-,-----, OHO � ` Pq t lift Jf K. O t 1 NAT -t _ MK MO M.K .K- t 1 1 u. ° W 41 rki ' s.e..s a' -. .a∎ - f ...e , �., .K. • MK _ 1 lass AG - >b Q • L0,a6 j"-" 1 M ..®�•O .6_ ®.! u 1 4 .. an uoaaK 11641 •c'_. it,, O i �� MQ O K �f.. � �_ _ . ,® 444� r.._ L 4 1 wW n _ �3 ' K r • r W, v -2".S.1-1..___ QrAc 0 H.wK: zaie• 11i ,. _ _ C a• 4 �.r _,_S ..s,r liki _ 1 l a,.> •Ra K. ©K- I1 r O is K 1 �, 1 '1 / �— i HAL O r n 12119C i ~.t K ' uK o '!•• raK v't.,.K �-- �'=1000' T �, a ® N r /1 n 11��yd ' .. �' 1 11 FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR CLEARVIEW SUBDIVISION SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH Prepared by The Orange County Planning Department July, 1993 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Clearview is a proposed 30-lot major subdivision located on the north side of West Ten Road east of Buckhorn Road. The average lot size is approximately 1.10 acres. All lots will be served by individual wells and septic tanks, and public roads. For clearview, project build-out is estimated at three years. Housing units will be constructed, beginning in 1994, with completion of the project scheduled for 1996. Units will consist of detached single-family homes, and the applicant estimates the average sales price to be $90,000, including the lot. METHODOLOGY Fiscal impact analysis is a projection of the direct, current, public costs and revenues associated with residential and non residential growth in the jurisdiction in which the growth is taking place. Fiscal impact analysis considers only direct impact in that it projects only the primary costs that will be incurred and the immediate revenues that will be generated. It calculates the financial effect of a planned development or new subdivision by considering the current costs and revenues such a development would generate if it were completed and occupied today. Fiscal impact analysis does not consider the private costs of public action. It is concerned only with public (governmental) costs and revenues. The method used in preparing the fiscal impact analysis is the Service Standard Approach. While only gross expenditures by service category are derived from the Per Capita method, the service standard method determines the total number of additional employees by service function that will be required as a result of growth. This method employs average county government costs per person, average school costs per pupil, an employee to population ratio, and average operating expenses per employee for each service category and school district. The number of new employees are projected and multiplied times the average operating expenses (includes personnel, operating and capital costs) per employee. These average costs are then weighed against per capita and per pupil revenues to project the total net fiscal impact of the development. 12 TABLE OF CONTENTS SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH PROJECT FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Section 1 - Project Data Project Name, Township, School District Beginning Year, Ending Year, Inflation Characteristics of Households Construction Schedule/cost Data Section 2 - Local Government and School District Data Budget Year Per Capita Revenues Per Capita Expenditures Per Student Expenditures School District Per Employee Expenditures Employees Per 1000 Population County Per Employee Expenditure Other Data Other Model Constants School District Data Section 3 - Demographic Projections Based On Project Data Total Housing Total Population School Children Additional County Employees Total School District Additional Employees Section 4 - Projected Net Fiscal Impact on County Tax Base Revenues Expenditures Net Fiscal Impact Section 5 - Projected Net Fiscal Impact on School District Revenues Expenditures Net Fiscal Impact Section 6 - Summary of Projected Impacts Additional Housing Additional Population Additional School Children Tax Base County Government Balance School District Balance Total Net Fiscal Impact EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND DATA SOURCES 13 FISCAL IMPACT TEMPLATE: SERVICE STANDARD METHOD Bureau of Economic & Business Research - Univ of Fla Modified 10/5/92 - Orange County, NC Planning Department SECTION 1 - PROJECT DATA ENTER THE FOLLOWING DATA FOR EACH PROJECT: PROJECT: Clearview Subdivision TOWNSHIP: Cheeks CONSTRUCTION PERIOD: Beginning Year: 1994 Ending Year: 1996 Inflation Rate: 2.90% CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSEHOLDS: Persons/House: 2.66 Children/House: 0.49 % Non-Elderly: 0.00% HOME SALES DATA: Average Distribution Number of Sales of Units Year Homes Price by Year 1994 10 90000 33.3% 1995 10 90000 33.3% 1996 10 90000 33.3% 1997 0 0 0.0% 1998 0 0 0.0% 1999 0 0 0.0% 2000 0 0 0.0% 2001 0 0 0.0% 2002 0 0 0.0% 2003 0 0 0.0% SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: Enter "1" in ( ) beside school district in which project is located to generate distribution of students by school type. School District: School Attendance: Orange County ( 1 ) Elementary School 49.53% Chapel Hill- ( 0 ) Middle School 23.49% Carrboro High School 26.98% School Age Children/Household: Enter number of units by housing type to generate school age children/household. School Age Children Housing Type Units Children Per Household Single-Family 30 15 0.490 Duplex/Triplex/Quadplex 0 0 0.000 Apartment/Condominium 0 0 0.000 Town House 0 0 0.000 Totals 30 15 0.490 14 SECTION 2 - LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA BUDGET YEAR: 1992-93 COUNTY POPULATION: 98648 SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT POPULATION: 5204 COUNTY EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER CAPITA General Government 107.50 0.0011 Public Safety 124.00 0.0013 Public Works 43.00 0.0004 Human Services 228.90 0.0023 Education (School District) 746.00 0.0076 SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER STUDENT TOTAL 746.00 0.143 COUNTY PER CAPITA REVENUES ($) : REVENUES PER CAPITA Taxes - Other Than Property 3641000 36.91 Intergovernmental 7758493 78.65 Service Charges 2114697 21.44 Miscellaneous 1036728 10.51 COUNTY PER CAPITA EXPENDITURES ($) : EXPENDITURES PER CAPITA General Government 5878463 59.59 Public Safety 5372356 54.46 Public Works 2548812 25.84 Human Services 13824259 140.14 Education (Recurring Capital) 750000 7.60 Non-Departmental 2438243 24.72 PER COUNTY PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURE ($) : EXPENDITURES EMPLOYEE General Government 5878463 54683.38 Public Safety 5372356 43325.45 Public Works 2548812 59274.70 Human Services 13824259 60394.32 Education (Recurring Capital) 750000 1005.36 SCHOOL DISTRICT PER STUDENT EXPENDITURES ($) : EXPENDITURES PER STUDENT County Government 6817240 1310.00 School District 0 0.00 State 16671230 3203.54 SCHOOL DISTRICT PER PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURES ($) : EXPENDITURES EMPLOYEE County Government 6817240 9138.39 School District 0 0.00 State 16671230 22347.49 TAX DATA: County Tax Rate ($) 0.7957 Per $100 Assessed Valuation. School District Tax Rate ($) 0.0000 Per $100 Assessed Valuation. Assessment Ratio 94.88 Elderly Exemption 0 $11,000 Where applicable. i 15 SECTION 3 - DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA YEAR 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 HOUSING UNITS 10 20 30 30 30 POPULATION 27 53 80 80 80 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 2 5 7 7 7 Middle 1 2 3 3 3 High School 1 3 4 4 4 TOTAL 5 10 15 15 15 COUNTY GOVERNMENT ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES General Government 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Public Safety 0.0 0.1 0. 1 0.1 0.1 Public Works 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Human Services 0.1 0. 1 0.2 0.2 0.2 TOTAL 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 SCHOOL DISTRICT ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 YEAR 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 HOUSING UNITS 30 30 30 30 30 POPULATION 80 80 80 80 80 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary . 7 7 7 7 7 Middle 3 3 3 3 3 High School 4 4 4 4 4 TOTAL 15 15 15 15 15 COUNTY GOVERNMENT ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES General Government 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Public Safety 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Public Works 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Human Services 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 TOTAL 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 SCHOOL DISTRICT ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 16 SECTION 4 - PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON COUNTY GOVERNMENT YEAR 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 TAX BASE ($1000) 854 1733 2637 2713 2792 REVENUES ($) Property Tax 6795 13786 20981 21589 22215 Other Taxes 982 2021 3119 3209 3302 Intergovernmental 2092 4305 6645 6838 7036 Service Charges 570 1174 1811 1864 1918 Miscellaneous 280 575 888 914 940 TOTAL ($) 10718 21861 33444 34414 35412 EXPENDITURES ($) General Government 1585 3262 5035 5181 5331 Public Safety 1449 2981 4602 4735 4872 Public Works 687 1414 2183 2246 2312 Human Services 3728 7672 11841 12184 12538 Education 6621 13626 21033 21642 22270 Non-Departmental 657 1353 2088 2149 2211 TOTAL ($) 14727 30309 46782 48138 49534 NET FISCAL IMPACT -4009 -8448 -13338 -13724 -14122 YEAR 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 TAX BASE ($1000) 2873 2956 3042 3130 3221 REVENUES ($) Property Tax 22860 23522 24205 24907 25629 Other Taxes 3398 3496 3598 3702 3810 Intergovernmental 7241 7450 7667 7889 8118 Service Charges 1974 2031 2090 2150 2213 Miscellaneous 968 996 1024 1054 1085 TOTAL ($) 36439 37496 38583 39702 40853 EXPENDITURES ($) General Government 5486 5645 5809 5977 6151 Public Safety 5014 5159 5309 5463 5621 Public Works 2379 2448 2519 2592 2667 Human Services 12901 13275 13660 14057 14464 Education 22916 23580 24264 24968 25692 Non-Departmental 2275 2341 2409 2479 2551 TOTAL ($) 50971 52449 53970 55535 57146 NET FISCAL IMPACT -14532 -14953 -15387 -15833 -16292 17 SECTION 5 - PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT YEAR 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 REVENUES ($) County 6621 13626 21033 21642 22270 School District 0 0 0 0 0 State 15697 32305 49863 51309 52797 TOTAL ($) 22319 45932 70896 72951 75067 EXPENDITURES ($) County 6621 13626 21033 21642 22270 School District 0 0 0 0 0 State 15697 32305 49863 51309 52797 TOTAL ($) 22319 45932 70896 72951 75067 NET FISCAL IMPACT 0 0 0 0 0 YEAR 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 REVENUES ($) County 22916 23580 24264 24968 25692 School District 0 0 0 0 0 State 54328 55904 57525 59193 60910 TOTAL ($) 77244 79484 81789 84161 86602 EXPENDITURES ($) County 22916 23580 24264 24968 25692 School District 0 0 0 0 0 State 54328 55904 57525 59193 60910 TOTAL ($) 77244 79484 81789 84161 86602 NET FISCAL IMPACT 0 0 0 0 0 18 _ SECTION 6 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED DEMOGRAPHIC/FISCAL IMPACTS YEAR 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 HOUSING UNITS 10 20 30 30 30 POPULATION 27 53 80 80 80 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 2 5 7 7 7 Middle 1 2 3 3 3 High school 1 3 4 4 4 TOTAL 5 10 15 15 15 COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0.14 0.27 0.41 0.41 0.41 SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYEES 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.60 0.60 TAX BASE ($1000) 854 1733 2637 2713 2792 COUNTY OPERATING BUDGET ($) Revenues 10718 21861 33444 34414 35412 Expenditures 14727 30309 46782 48138 49534 BALANCE -4009 -8448 -13338 -13724 -14122 SCHOOL DISTRICT OPERATING BUDGET ($) Revenues 22319 45932 70896 72951 75067 Expenditures 22319 45932 70896 72951 75067 BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 COMBINED COUNTY/SCHOOL DISTRICT OPERATING BUDGETS ($) Revenues 33037 67793 104340 107366 110479 Expenditures 37046 76241 117677 121090 124602 BALANCE -4009 -8448 -13338 -13724 -14122 YEAR 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 HOUSING UNITS 30 30 30 30 30 POPULATION 80 80 80 80 80 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 7 7 7 7 7 Middle 3 3 3 3 3 High School 4 4 4 4 4 TOTAL 15 15 15 15 15 COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYEES 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 TAX BASE ($1000) 2873 2956 3042 3130 3221 COUNTY OPERATING BUDGET ($) Revenues 36439 37496 38583 39702 40853 Expenditures 50971 52449 53970 55535 57146 BALANCE -14532 -14953 -15387 -15833 -16292 SCHOOL DISTRICT OPERATING BUDGET ($) Revenues 77244 79484 81789 84161 86602 Expenditures 77244 79484 81789 84161 86602 BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 COMBINED COUNTY/SCHOOL DISTRICT OPERATING BUDGETS ($) Revenues 113683 116980 120372 123863 127455 Expenditures 128215 131933 135759 139696 143747 BALANCE -14532 -14953 -15387 -15833 -16292 19 EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND DATA SOURCES SECTION 1 - PROJECT DATA Project data includes information about the specific development project. Much, if not all, of the information is supplied by the applicant. Data inputs include: Project Name: Name of the project. Township: Township in which the project is located. School District: School district in which the project is located. Beginning Year: The first year of the project in which dwelling units are completed and occupied. Ending Year: The last year in which dwelling units are completed and occupied. The template is set to calculate fiscal impacts for a ten-year period. Inflation Rate: Unless an inflation rate is entered, the template will calculate fiscal impacts based on constant dollars. since the inflation rate changes frequently, the Finance Department must be contacted for the most recent figure. Persons/Household: The estimated average number of persons/household (dwelling unit) based on 1990 Census data for the township in which the project is located. This information is supplied by the Planning Department and will be updated as necessary using population projections and building permit data. Children/Household: The estimated average number of school age children/household (dwelling unit) based on 1990 Census data for the township in which the project is located. This information is supplied by the Planning Department and will be updated as necessary using school membership data. % Non-Elderly: N.C. General Statutes permit an $11,000 exemption to the elderly and disabled who meet certain income criteria. In the event that elderly units are part of the project, the percentage of eligible non-elderly units is entered. The tax base will automatically be adjusted to reflect the exemption. Number of Homes: The number of dwelling units to be constructed in the project in each year. Average Sales Price: The average sales price of all dwelling units based on the number and sales price of dwelling unit types to be constructed in each year. 20 SECTION 2 - LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA Local government data includes information regarding expenditures required to provide County services and revenues received based on the approved Orange County budget for the fiscal year in which the project is considered for approval. All information derived from the approved budget remains constant throughout a fiscal year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of a new budget. Local government revenue and expenditure information is compiled on a per capita (per person) basis. Per capita figures are derived by dividing the total expenditures for a particular service function or revenue source by the estimated population of Orange County for the year in which the project is considered for approval. Populations estimates are prepared by the Planning Department. Data inputs include the following: Budget Year: The current fiscal year; i.e. , 1992-93. Per Capita Revenues: The sources of revenue by major category are as follows: Taxes - Other Than Property: Revenues from taxes other than property taxes include those from sales and use taxes, franchise taxes, and animal taxes. Intergovernmental Aid: Revenues from this source, in the form of categorical aid or shared-tax revenues, are provided through State and federal assistance programs. Service Charges: Service (or user) charges support numerous functions and are charged to those who voluntarily receive governmental services or use governmental facilities. Miscellaneous: Miscellaneous revenues include interest earnings on investments, proceeds from license and permit fees, and all other revenues. Per Capita Expenditures: Expenditures by major category are as follows: General Government: Services related to the legislative, administrative, financial, and legal functions of government. Public Safety: Law enforcement services and emergency medical services. Public Works: Efforts related to the maintenance of County-owned property and the provision of sanitation (solid waste disposal) services. Human Services: Departments responsible for the provision of health, social, and recreation-related services. Education: orange County supports two school units, the orange County school system and the chapel Hill\Carrboro school system. This category includes appropriations made to the designated school system for Recurring Capital items. Recurring Capital funds are used for general maintenance, purchase of new equipment/furnishings and vehicle maintenance. Non-Departmental: contributions to agencies providing cultural and social services outside the formal structure of county government. Other expenditures include equipment replacement and contingency funds. Although there are no employees generated by this category, it has been included as an operating expenditure. It will be included in Section 4, "Total Annual County Expenditure." These expenditures will be calculated on a per capita basis as opposed to a per employee basis. Per Student Expenditures: Information regarding expenditures required to provide educational services and revenues received are based on the approved school system budgets for the fiscal year in which the project is considered for approval. All information derived from the approved budgets remains constant throughout a fiscal year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of new budgets. 21 Expenditure information is compiled on a per student basis for County Government Current Expense, School District and State appropriations. County Government Current Expense funds are used for general operation purposes including Instruction and support Services. Federal revenues and expenditures and other local revenues such as Fund Balance have not been included since they are not directly growth related. Per student figures are derived by dividing the total appropriation for educational purposes from a particular source by the estimated number of students to be enrolled in the applicable school system for the year in which the project is considered for approval. Student enrollments are obtained from the approved school system budgets. County Government: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations to the school systems by orange County for Current Expense. The minimum level of per student appropriation is determined by the State Board of Education. School District: Expenditures in this category are unique to the Chapel Hill-Carrboro school system and are based on the level of expenditures possible through assessment of a supplementary school tax. State: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations from the State Board of Education. School District Per Employee Expenditure: Expenditures per employee based on County, school District and State appropriations, and the total number of school district employees. Employees Per 1000 Population: The number of employees in a particular service category per 1000 population. County Per Employee Expenditure: The average operating and capital expenses per employee in a particular service category. Total expenses in each category includes personnel, operating and capital costs. other Data: County Government Tax Rate: The County tax rate per $100 of assessed valuation. Since the per capita method focuses only on operating expenditures, the tax rate is reduced by an amount equal to the debt service payments from property taxes for capital projects. School District Tax Rate: The supplementary tax assessed on behalf of the Chapel Hill- Carrboro school system. Assessment Ratio: The ratio of market (sales) value to assessed value based on information supplied by the Tax Office. The assessment ratio is used to convert market value to assessed value for the purpose of computing the tax base. Other Model Constants Elderly Exemption: For projects developed partially or exclusively for elderly (65 and older) or disabled individuals whose annual income does not exceed $12,000, an $11,000 tax exemption is used in projecting the tax base. School District Data: Employees Per Student: The number of employees per student in a specific school district. 22 SECTION 3 - DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA Demographic projections provide information about the number of new residents and school children anticipated in orange County resulting from project development. Projections also provide the number of additional employees required per service function and school district as a result of the new development. Total Housing Units: The cumulative total of new housing units added each year by project development. Total Population: The total population added each year by a project derived by multiplying the number of homes to be constructed by the number of persons per household (see Section 1) . School Population: The total number of school children added each year by a project derived by multiplying the number of homes constructed by the number of children per household (see Section 1) . Additional County Employees: The number of additional employees required per service category based on project development. Total: Total of all additional county employees required based on project development. School District Additional Employees: The number of additional employees required per school district based on the project development. SECTION 4 - PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON COUNTY Tax Base: The tax base represents the increase in assessed property value expected each year resulting from project development. The values shown are in $1,000's and are derived from a formula which includes the number and sales price of homes, and the assessment ratio. Where applicable, the percentage of non-elderly units and elderly exemption are also used. Revenues: All revenues are derived from a formula which multiplies the per capita revenues (Section 2) times the projected population (section 3) . The exception to this is the property tax which multiplies the tax base times the county government tax rate. Expenditures: All expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies the per employee expenditure (Section 2) times the number of additional employees (Section 3) . Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures and projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs Orange County more to provide services to a project than it receives in revenues. A positive net balance indicates that more revenues are received than it costs to serve a project. Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset negative balances in another. 23 SECTION 5 - PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT Revenues: The County contribution is derived by transferring education expenditures by County government (section 4) . Revenues derived from the school district tax are derived by multiplying the school district tax times the tax base. State revenues are derived by multiplying the per student expenditure figure times the total projected number of school children (Section 3) . Expenditures: Expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies each per student expenditure (Section 2) times the total projected number of school children (section 3) and adding the results. Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures and projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs the school system more to provide educational services for children in a project than it receives in revenues. A positive net balance indicates that more revenues are received than it costs to serve a project. Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset negative balances in another. SECTION 6 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED IMPACTS .__J 1 24 2 . That a project-wide impervious surface limit of six percent (6%) (463, 339 square feet) be applied, with an additional ten percent ( 10%) (46,334 square feet) available with approval of the Planning Director; and 3 . That the Final Plat show proposed building envelopes, driveways, and an impervious surface allotment for each lot. The Resolution of Approval has been modified to show the changes and is an attachment to these minutes on pages (2 ) Clearview (30 Lots - Cheeks Township) Presentation by Emily Cameron. The property is located in Cheeks Township on the north side of West Ten Road (SR 1144 ) 2000 feet east of Buckhorn Road (SR 1114 ) and south of Interstate 85/40. In the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan, the area is designates as Twenty Year Transition in the Commercial- Industrial Activity Node. It is in the Upper Eno Watershed. Current zoning is Residential-1 and Protected Watershed II, with a small portion in the Major Transportation Corridor. Adjacent land uses are , agricultural and residential. No traffic count information is available for this portion of West Ten Road. The total acreage of the tract is approximately 35.7 acres. The applicant proposes to create thirty (30 ) lots on a new public loop road to be developed in three ( 3) phases. Most of the lots are 40,000 squarelfeet in size. Six (6) lots are approximately one acre each. Two 2.5 to 3-acre lots are located at the northern end of the subdivision. The proposed lots will be served by individual wells and septic tanks, with the exception of lots 22 and 25, which shall have easements for sewage disposal located on lots 23 and 24. The stream that flows northeast across the northern portion of the subdivision is intermittent; therefore, a stream buffer is not required. Lots 23 and 24 are proposed as flag lots with a joint driveway crossing the stream. Construction of the joint driveway will be III 25 included with the improvements required for final approval of Phase C. The Planning Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan for Clearview Subdivision with a public road built to State standards and the conditions contained in the Resolution of Approval (a copy an attachment to these minutes on pages ) . Barrows noted that there is a road name, Preston George Road in Little River Township, and asked if that could create problems with the name Preston Loop. Cameron responded that she would check the road name again with the Fire Marshall and Information Services to be sure that it is acceptable. Barrows asked for a explanation of a Type A Land Use Buffer. Cameron responded that it is required along a collector road between the road right-of-way and residential development. It is the thirty feet adjacent to the right-of-way. It is basically a row of trees, not intended to be a solid screen. Eidenier asked about the shape of Lot 27 . Cameron responded that it had to do with the site for the septic system. Surveyor Steve Yuhasz agreed. Waddell asked about the address numbering system for a loop road. Cameron responded that was a question for Information Services since they assign house numbers. Barrows why lots 22 and 25 must have a septic easements on lots 23 and 24 . Cameron responded that lots 22 and ?5 do not contain an area suitable for septic systems. Such easements have to be approved by the Health Department and easement agreements are reviewed and approved by the County Attorney. Steve Yuhasz explained that the septic tanks would be located on the lots that they are serving and the effluent will be pumped to the easements. Hamilton asked about the joint driveway. Cameron responded that the joint driveway was recommended with the Concept Plan in order to minimize disturbance of the creek and will serve lots 23 and 24 . The joint driveway will cross the creek and then will split into individual driveways. n 26 D If Eidenier asked about possible pollution of the creek by the septic lines. Cameron responded that the septic line crossing the creek is a solid line. If any back up occurred in the system, it would likely happen at the house. MOTION: Reid moved approval as recommended by the Planning Staff. Seconded by Hoecke. VOTE: Unanimous. (3 ) Fox Hill Farm Phase Two Section A (43 Lots - Eno Township) Presentation by Eddie Kirk. The property is located in Eno Township on the east side of Baldwin Road (SR 1554 ) at the intersection with Miller Road (SR 1555) . Miller Road is a paved State-maintained road, however, Baldwin is an unpaved State-maintained road. A 1992 traffic count indicated 150 trips per day on Miller Road and 80 trips per day on Baldwin Road. The property is zoned Agricultural Residential (AR) and is designated Agricultural Residential in the Comprehensive Plan. Public roads are proposed to serve the subdivision. The Town of Hillsborough has indicated that the main entrance road into the subdivision is designated as a proposed major thoroughfare and part of the Town's proposed loop system on the 1987 Hillsborough Thoroughfare Plan. This plan was adopted by the Town and NCDOT, but not by the County. The Plan indicates this road is a third priority which is designated between the years 2000 to 2005 . Since this road is proposed to be a major thoroughfare and part of the proposed loop system, access for lots 1, 3, 4, and 5 will be provided from internal access roads. NCDOT has indicated temporary cul-de-sacs or turnarounds must be provided at the end of Northfield Lane and Little Leaf Lane and sight distance triangles must be located at each intersection. The Planning Board reviewed the Concept Plan for Fox Hill Farm Phase Two Section A at its April 13, 1993 meeting and was approved with 5 conditions. Those conditions, as well as agency comments, have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. Kirk reviewed the