Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 06-29-1993 - III-U 1 ORANGE C O U N T Y BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: June 29 , 1993 Agenda Abstract Item # SUBJECT: ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY - CONSULTANT SELECTION DEPARTMENT: Planning PUBLIC HEARING: Yes_X_No ATTACHMENTS: INFORMATION CONTACT: Survey Contract Planning Director X2592 Draft 5/26/93 HPC Minutes PHONE NUMBERS: Hillsborough 732-8181 Mebane 227-2031 Durham 688-7331 Chapel Hill 967-9251 PURPOSE: To consider selection of a consultant to conduct the archaeological survey as part of the Phase III Historic Inventory. BACKGROUND: At its January 19, 1993 meeting, the Board of Commissioners authorized the County Manager to apply for $15,000 from the Survey and Planning Grant Program administered by the State Historic Preservation Office. The Planning Director was notified on March 15, 1993 that the application had been approved, and the Board of Commissioners voted unanimously to accept the grant on April 5, 1993. The grant amount plus the County's matching share will total $30,000 and be used to conduct an inventory of archaeological sites in the unincorporated portions of Orange County ($20,000) and prepare the manuscript for the countywide inventory ($10,000) . The County share would consist of $15,000 cash plus a $5,200 in-kind contribution. Professional services funds requested as part of the Planning Department's FY 1993-94 budget would be used to cover the cash match. The in-kind contribution includes supplies and equipment expense, and Planning Department staff time on the project. Personnel and operating expenses will be covered in the FY 1993-94 Planning Department budget. The State Historic Preservation Office informed the Planning Director that the County had a choice in determining a consultant for the project. A request 2 for proposals could be sent out and a consultant selected from those persons submitting proposals, or the services of the Research Laboratories of Anthropology at the University of North Carolina could be used. The Planning Director was also informed that separate contracts for the archaeological inventory and the manuscript preparation would be required. The Historic Preservation Commission was provided with the above information at its May 26, 1993 meeting. Following a discussion of the options, the Historic Preservation Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the contract for preparation of the archaeological survey be awarded to the Research Laboratories of Anthropology of the University of North Carolina. The Office of State Archaeology has prepared contracts for the archaeological survey, including the Research Laboratories of Anthropology of the University of North Carolina as the consultant. If approved by the Board of Commissioners, the survey project could begin on July 1, 1993. RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that the Research Laboratories of Anthropology of the University of North Carolina be employed as the consultant to conduct the archaeological survey as part of Phase III of the Historic Inventory. The Administration further recommends that the consultant be reimbursed for its services in an amount not to exceed $20,000. ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF ORANGE COUNTY 1993 SURVEY AND PLANNING GRANT PROJECT DESCRIPTION SECTION 1 . INTRODUCTION This project description is for an archaeological survey of portions of Orange County , North Carolina, to be conducted using a Survey and Planning Grant from the National Park Service of the U. S. Department of the Interior, as administered by the North Carolina Division of Archives and History (hereinafter the Division) . The survey will be carried out by the Research Laboratories of Anthropology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill for Orange County. This description identifies the overall objectives, general approaches, reporting format, significant personnel , and schedule for the project. SECTION 2. PERSONNEL Mr. Marvin Collins shall serve as Project Coordinator and Dr. Vincas Steponaitis shall serve as Principal Investigator (hereinafter the , .P. I . ) for the project. Ms. Dolores A. Hall , Office of State Ar- chaeology , shall serve as Project Specialist and contact for the Division. Additional project personnel , including the Principal Consultant, shall be identified by the P. I . in consultation with the Project Specialist as necessary and desired in accordance with the budget schedule below. Personnel employed for field or laboratory supervisors must, however, meet the professional qualifications criteria set forth by the National Park Service, Department of the Interior, in 36 CFR Part 66 ( Federal Register 42 ( 19 ) , 1977 ) . SECTION 3. BUDGET The project shall adhere to the budget schedule (Attachment A) and the accounting procedures defined in the Project Memorandum of Agreement (Attachment B) . The Project Coordinator and the P. I . , in coordination with the Principal Consultant, shall be responsible for maintaining all accounting documentation for the project. Additional stipulations pertaining to the budget are identified in the Appendix of this Description. SECTION 4. PROJECT SCHEDULE The project shall begin on or after July 1 , 1993 , and shall end on or before September 30 , 1994. SECTION 5 . PROJECT OBJECTIVES The primary objective of the project is to conduct a survey of the archaeological resources contained within certain portions of Orange County . The survey will be accomplished by background research and a reconnaissance level survey to identify areas with a high probability of containing prehistoric and historic sites. High probability areaswill then be more intensively examined . Areas to be investigated 4 will be selected in consultation with the Project Specialist after preliminary background research . Emphasis shall be placed on those areas under pressure from development, areas likely to contain Middle Woodland occupations and areas likely to contain 18th and 19th century homesteads . The project is a part of a long-range research program in Orange County designed to enhance current knowledge concerning the nature and distributions of archaeological sites associated with both prehistoric and early historic occupation in the eastern Piedmont. Archaeological sites identified during the survey shall be evaluated with respect to the National Register of Historic Places criteria and recommendations will be made for subsequent research and preservation planning . A formal report shall present the project results . SECTION 6. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project will be conducted in accordance with the proposal abstract presented in Attachment C (as it pertains to the archaeological survey) . In addition , the project shall adhere to the following conditions: ( 1 ) The survey methods employed during the project may consist of subsurface testing , but such testing shall not expand to the level of archaeological excavation under this grant. Where testing is conducted , all fill dirt shall be screened through 1/4" mesh hardware cloth to recover archaeological artifacts. ( 2 ) No archaeological feature or human burial shall be excavated under this grant without specific consultation with the Project Specialist. ( 3 ) All archaeological sites identified during the project will be recorded on North Carolina Archaeological Site Forms (to be furnished by the Division ) . (4 ) All areas surveyed will be clearly marked on U .S.G. S. 7 . 5 ' topographic maps. ( 5 ) All work conducted under this grant shall be consistent with the Secretary of the Interior 's Standards and Guidelines for Archeological Documentation ( Federal Register 48( 190 ) ) . Following completion of the field survey, the P. I . will complete all artifact and data analysis and shall prepare a complete report on the project activities for submission to the Division (see Section 7 ) . SECTION 7 . PROJECT REPORTING ( 1 ) Interim Reports. On or before September 1 , 1993 , the P. I . shall prepare and submit to the Division a brief - Interim - report on the grant activities to date. Subsequent interim reports shall be submitted on or before the following dates : November 1 , 1993 January 1 , 1994 March 1 , 1994 May 1 , 1994 5 The report shall note any significant results or findings of the research , specific problems encountered during the work , recommendations or requests for any amendments to the terms of this description , and the projected schedule for project completion if different from that defined by this agreement. (2 ) Draft Final Report. The P. I . shall prepare and submit to the Division a complete draft report on or before July 1 , 1994. The report shall include but not be limited to the following : (a) Abstract: containing summary information on the objectives and results of the project. (b) Introduction: including but not limited to sponsorship of the project and funding sources (with specific reference to the U. S. Department of the Interior and the North Carolina Division of Archives and History; see also Appendix). (c) Background: including a discussion of the background research conducted on the archaeological and environmental context of the project. • (d) Survey Methods: including discussions of the sampling or other survey area selection criteria, the survey techniques, and other data collection techniques employed during the project. (e) Project Results: including discussions of the findings of the survey, artifactual analyses, and any locational analyses conducted during the project. Descriptions , drawings , photographs and tables of cultural materials and investigated sites should be included in these discussions. (f) Conclusions, evaluations, and recommendations: including site- specific evaluations of research and preliminary National Register of Historic Places significance and recommendations for future research and planning. (g) Tables, maps and figures: including lists of artifacts , photographs of artifacts and sites , and maps of surveyed areas ( using U . S .G. S. Quadrangle maps ) . ( h) North Carolina Archaeological Site Forms: All archaeological sites identified during the project shall be recorded on site forms furnished by the Division. For previously recorded sites, an update of old information shall be provided by the P. I . to the Division . [Note: All archaeological site references in the final report must employ official State Archaeological Site number designations. Specific site location information should not be included in the body of the report, but may be included as detachable appendices. ] (3) Final Report. Following submission of the draft final report by the P. I . , the Division shall have 30 days to review the report and communicate all necessary or recommended changes to the P. I . prior to preparation of the final project report. On or before September 30 , 1994, the P. I . shall submit three ( 3 ) copies of the final report to 6 the Division . [Note : The Final Project Report should be single- spaced and fully paginated . ] The Division retains all editorial , reproduction, publication , and distribution rights to the project report. Arrangements may be made , however, between the Division for waiver of these rights . Any subsequent use of the report, documentation or results of the project by Orange County and/or the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill shall include appropriate recognition of the funding sources for the project. SECTION 8. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY THE DIVISION The Division shall provide the P. I . with all necessary computer- adapted North Carolina Archaeological Site Forms during the project, and shall make available any and all information currently available in its files which may be pertinent to the effective completion of the ' project. SECTION 9. CURATORIAL RESPONSIBILITIES Under the terms of this agreement, all materials, records, photographs, maps, and other documentation generated by this project remain the property of the State of North Carolina. Arrangements will be made between the Division , Orange County and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill for the curation of all or a portion of these items following completion of the project. SECTION 10. ADDITIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR It shall be the responsibility of the P. I . to obtain proper permission to conduct investigations and temporarily or permanently remove any artifacts or other materials from privately owned properties. The P. I . shall also be responsible for obtaining any permits required for conducting archaeological investigations on state or federally owned lands. SECTION 11 . AGREEMENT In consideration of the signing of this Contract for the performance of work and furnishing of labor and materials as set forth herein , the parties hereto for themselves, their agents, officials, and employees or servants agree not to discriminate in any manner on the basis of age, handicap , sex, race, color; creed , sexual orientation, or national origin with reference to the subject matter of this Contract, no matter how remote. This provision is hereby incorporated into this Contract for the benefit of the Grantee and may be enforced by action for specific performance, injunctive relief, or other remedy as by law provided . This project description and attachments are hereby agreed to on this day of , 1993 . 7 For Orange County : For the Division of Archives and History : Marvin Collins David Brook , Deputy Project Coordinator State Historic Preservation Officer For UNC - Chapel Hill : Robert P. Lowman Director of Research Services Principal Investigator: Dr. Vincas Steponaitis, Research Laboratories of Anthropology R ATTACHMENT A ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF ORANGE COUNTY 1993 BUDGET This budget includes only cash portion of grant. BACKGROUND RESEARCH 2592 Project Supervisor ( 18 days/$10 per hour) Research Assistant ( 18 days/$8 per hour) FIELDWORK 9360 Project Supervisor (45 days/$10 per hour) Research Assistants (2 ) (90 days/$8 per hour) ANALYSIS, REPORT PREPARATION , ETC 4320 Project Supervisor ( 18 days/$10 per hour) Research Assistants ( 2 ) (45 days/$8 per hour) TRAVEL 1728 7680 miles @. 225/mile INDIRECT COSTS 2000 TOTAL $20,000 0 STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE DIVISION OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES • SUBGRANT AGREEMENT This Subgrant Agreement is entered into this 15th day of March, 1993 by the State Historic Preservation Office (HPO) , hereafter known as the HPO, and Orange County, Grantee, for and. in consideration of a federal grant in the amount of $15, 000 (fifteen thousand dollars) , for the purpose of manuscript preparation of the Orange County architectural survey, and conducting an archaeological survey of selected areas within Orange County. The project must be completed no later than September 30, 1994 . SUBGRANTEE STANDARDS: The Subgrantee agrees to: have a satisfactory record of performance; comply with the required completion schedule for the project; conform with debarment requirements; and be otherwise qualified and eligible to receive a grant award under applicable laws and regulations. AGREEMENT: The Subgrantee agrees to match the grant with funds or services from nonfederal sources within the grant period, to use grant and matching funds or services for the purpose specified above, and to furnish such reports-and documentation, financial or otherwise, as may be specified by the HPO. Project activities shall be performed according to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Archaeology and Historic Preservation, under the guidelines and professional supervision of the HPO. APPENDIX FOR SUBGRANT AGREEMENTS: The Subgrantee agrees to the stipulations contained in the attached "Appendix for Subgrant Agreements" . The Appendix shall be attached to all contracts involving project activities. PAYMENT OF GRANT FUNDS: The HPO agrees to reimburse the Grantee up to 60% of all expenditures for the project as described. Upon request the HPO may advance the Grantee up to 25% of the HPO's share of the project cost. After satisfactory documentation of this advance, including at least 40% matching share, additional advances may be requested. Final payment of grant funds will be paid only after satisfactory project completion. G T STATE HISTORIC P' . :NATION OFFICE o n M. Link, cunty Manager 4 �A = Signature and title Depu y State Historic �� Preservation Officer April 6, 1993 ailejt-P -7 Date Dat / / �� 10 • ' ATTACHMENT C Since the inception of ite comprehensive planning program,, a goal of Orange . I . County has been the completion of detailed inventories of its•cultural, •historical, recreational, biological, and geological resources. In 1986, the Planning Department .• { . completed a general listing of such sites in the unincorporated P portions of the county. While some field surveys were conducted for site •i verification purposes, the listing was • I. based exclusively on existing documentation. ' In 1988, a Master Recreation and Parks Plan was prepared .for Orange County. . I. . During the same year, the Triangle Land Conservancy completed an Inventory of Natural . Areas and Wildlife Habitats of Orange County. These studies provided the detailed r. . inventory of recreational, geological, and biological sites. • . Consistent with the above goal, in January, 1991, Orange County applied for . • Survey and Planning Grant Funds to undertake an inventory of histor c sites and structures in the unincorporated portions of Cha el Hit 1 Township, he most populous t1 P and urbanized of the county's seven townships. Following notice of the grant .award in May of Y 199*, the inventory project was . • begun in December and completed in June of 1992. Based on the inventory conducted by • the consultants, the area contained 159 structures of significance. .• The Chapel Hill Township inventory was the first of a four-phase project. The ' second phase, and the one for which Planning and Survey Grant Funds are being used now, . . consists of an inventory of the remaining unincorporated portions of the county. Notice of the grant award occurred in May, 1992, and contracts with the consultants were • signed in December. To date, a planning phase and four of 13 phases'of the . . comprehensive survey have been completed. When completed in July of 1993, approximately • 700 sites of historical significance will have been identified and surveyed. As noted in the 1992 grant application, the third phase, and the one for which • • Planning and Survey Funds are being requested, will consist of two parts, including the , publication of a county-wide inventory and an inventory of archaeological sites. • . 11 • Although Orange County will seek the support of municipalities and private interests in the actual publication of the inventory, funds are being requested to employ a ' consultant to prepare the manuscript and collect photographs for the inventory document. j A consultant will also be sought to undertake the archaeological survey: The survey is a spin-off of the historic sites/structures inventory in that a doctoral candidate at the University of North Carolina was employed as an intern by the Planning Department to follow behind the work of the consultants in the Chapel Hill Township survey, seeking to identify archaeological sites at each location which may be worthy of more detailed investigation. The intern is also reviewing ,the existing record of archaeological sites in the county in order to assess their potential relative to National Register criteria. The work of the Planning Intern will be incorporated into the survey strategy described below, and known sites that appear eligible for nomination to the National Register will be investigated to determine their current • • .- j ' status. /---....1 I The archaeological survey for which funds are requested will seek to identify and assess archaeological sites to compliment the architectural survey which is currently • I . being conducted in the remaining portions of the county. The survey1will be accomplished by background research and a reconnaissance level survey to identify areas . with a high probability of containing prehistoric and historic sites. High probability i areas will be further subjected to intensive surface survey as well1as shovel and auger testing where ground surface conditions prevent a surface appraisal . In addition, the Planning Department will identify sections of the county where future development is likely to occur. These areas will also be subjected to intensive surface survey. Local artifact collectors and other persons knowledgeable of archaeological and historic sites in Orange County will be interviewed and their collections inventoried. All sites recorded will be subjected to a preliminary i 12 H . • evaluation in terms of their I potential• for meeting criteria of eliTibility for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places. • After the field survey LB completed, a final report will be re pared� P in accordance with guidelines provided by the .Office of State Archaeology. The results of the archaeological survey as well as the architectural survey will.be used in completing the fourth phase of Orange County's program, curently scheduled for 1994. That phase will consist of preparation of an Historic Preservation' Element as part of the Comprehensive Plan and nominations for the National Register of Historic Places. With the assistance of a consultant, the Planning' Department will prepare the Historic Preservation Element. The consultant will also prepare the National Register nominations. All phases will be subject to local funding a roval as well as the availability abilit Y of Planning and Survey Grant Funds • • • II • • • • • 11 APPENDIX for SUBGRANT AGREEMENTS The following stipulations apply to all subgrant projects funded in part by federal Historic Preservation Fund (HPF) monies awarded to the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources , Division of Archives and History, State Historic Preservation Office (HPO) , by the U . S . Department of the Interior, National Park Service. References to the stipulations may be addressed in the GRANTEE HANDBOOK FOR SURVEY AND PLANNING GRANTS, as indicated below. Questions about the application of these conditions to specific projects are available from the specialists assigned to subgrant projects or from Lloyd D. Childers , grants administrator , 109 E. Jones St. , Raleigh, NC 27601-2807 . Telephone: ( 919 ) 733-4763 . 1 . PROCUREMENT: Subgrantees must forward to the HPO evidence of compliance with Federal competitive procurement requirements for professional services and subcontracts prior to reimbursement, if applicable. (see Handbook: Federal Grant Requirements and Appendix: 43 CFR 12 . 36 ) 2 . RETENTION OF RECORDS: Acceptable Federal and nonfederal share supporting documentation must be submitted prior to reimbursement, if applicable. Documentation includes: copies of contract, timesheets , front and back of cancelled checks (or computer printouts) , invoices, etc. (see Handbook : Federal Grant Requirements and Appendix: 43 CFR 12 .41 and 12 .42 ) 3 . CHANGES IN SCOPE: The approved scope of work, products, budget and performance/reporting milestones included in the contract cannot be changed without prior written approval from the HPO. (see Handbook: Contracts and Project Descriptions) 4. LOBBYING PROHIBITED: Subgrantees must conform with the following text of 18 U. S.C. 1913 , which prohibits the use of the subgrant funds for lobbying : No part of the money appropriated by any enactment of Congress shall, in the absence of express authorization by Congress, be used directly or indirectly to pay for any personal service, advertisement, telegram, telephone, letter, printed or written matter, or other device, intended or designated to influence in any manner a Member of Congress, to favor or oppose by vote or otherwise, any legislation or appropriation by Congress, whether before or after the introduction of any bill or resolution proposing such legislation or appropriation; but this shall not prevent officers or employees of the United States or its Department or agencies from communication to Members of Congress on the request of any Member or to Congress, through the proper official channels, requests for legislation or appropriations which they deem necessary for the efficient conduct of the public business. 14 5 . NON-FEDERAL AUDIT: Subgrantees are responsible for obtaining audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act of 1984 for State or local governments , or the audit requirements of OMB Circular A- 110 for universities and nonprofit organizations . The audits shall be made by an independent auditor in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards covering financial and compliance audits. ( see Handbook: Appendix: 43 CFR 12 . 26 ) 6 . PUBLICATIONS. Acknowledgement of federal grant assistance should be made in connection with the publication of any material based on , or developed under, any activity supported by HPF grant funds, as follows : The activity that is the subject of this (type of publication) has been financed ( in part/entirely) with Federal funds from the National Park Service, Department of the Interior. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior. NOTE: The design and content of any publication produced from a survey of architectural or archaeological resources must be reviewed and approved by the HPO prior to its printing. 7 . SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF SUBGRANT. Voluntary and involuntary suspension or termination of the subgrant, in whole or in part, by either the State or subgrantee may occur at any time prior to the date of project completion. (see Handbook: Appendix: 43 CFR 12 . 43 , 12 .44) 8. STANDARDS FOR FINAL PRODUCTS. Final products which do not conform to the terms and conditions of the grant agreement or which do not meet the applicable Secretary of the Interior's "Standards" will not be reimbursed. (see Handbook: Appendix: Standards and Guidelines) 9 . EQUAL OPPORTUNITY. Subgrantee must comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. (see Handbook: Federal Grant Requirements) 10 . OTHER REQUIREMENTS: In addition to the terms detailed in this Subgrant Agreement, all Federal requirements governing grants are applicable. (Office of Management and Budget Circulars A-87 or A-121 , A- 102 or A-110 , and A-128) Prepared by : Lloyd D. Childers , Grants Administrator Historic Preservation Office, Division of Archives and History October , 1990 Draft 5/26/93 HPC Minutes 15 inventoried. Collins responded that last year Chapel Hill inventoried the Gimghoul historic district and the University, and according to Beverly Kawalec this covered what they considered to be the most significant historic sites and structures. Collins suggested to separate preparation of the manuscript and publication of the manuscript. He suggested to prepare the manuscript and then solicit contributions from municipalities, historical societies, etc. Todd Dickinson asked how much money has been funded for preparation of the manuscript. Collins responded $10, 000. 00. Ward discussed the layout and what he thought would be the cheapest way to go. He stated that if you have someone to do the layout in the beginning, you would save a lot of money in the end with printing costs. He suggested doing the layout with a word processing package such as Microsoft Word or WordPerfect before sending to the publisher. Experience with word processing may be something to consider when hiring a consultant. Anderson suggested to have someone who has completed a similar inventory to come and talk to the Commission to discuss the layout, printing costs, etc. Ward stated that a colleague of his, Steve Davis, who has done layouts on several books and is an editor in southeastern archaeology, could come and talk to the Commission and would not require a professional fee. Todd Dickinson stated that Planning Staff could also arrange for a representative from Archives and History to come to the next meeting to discuss the manuscript. Collins stated that he would like for the Orange County inventory to be the best in the State. The Commission agreed that the person selected to do the manuscript should be good at writing histories, inventories, and knowledgeable in architecture. Todd Dickinson suggested that the consultants be asked what they can give the Commission for $10, 000. 00. White agreed that first the manuscript should be written and then the layout should be done. 4,), b. Phase III Inventory - Consultant Selection Ward stated that he had talked to Delores Hall and Mark Mathis at the Archives & History office and they recommended that the archaeological inventory be done by students through the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He stated that since UNC is in the middle of the County and the students are studying archaeology, he agreed with their recommendation. He further stated that he feels a responsibility that he should see that the best job possibly is done, but he would not receive any compensation from the project. He also noted that the students are all Ph.D. candidates. Anderson asked why look any further for resources when the top- 16 notched ones are right here in the County. White stated that she agreed with Anderson. Todd Dickinson asked if the consultants would be paid by the University. Ward stated yes. The principal investigator would be responsible for the amount of work being done. Time sheets would be turned in. He stated that a specific document will be drawn up. Collins commented that the best approach would be to run the project through the University. It would also save time with RFP' s. He stated that the Planning Department has used graduate and undergraduate students from UNC for a number of years with really good results. Trawick Ward left the room and did not participate in the vote. MOTION: Anderson moved that the archaeological portion of the inventory be done through the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Seconded by White. White stated that it 's good if a professional can do quality work for a set amount of money. Todd Dickinson agreed that the Commission is lucky to have great resources and don't have to explain to them what is wanted but they can explain what should be done and then do it. The Commission will also get a good financial deal. VOTE: Unanimous. Ward re-entered the room. Collins stated that there are options for the selection of consultants for the manuscript. One option is to continue to employ Todd Peck and Jody Carter for the writing of the manuscript. The other option is to send out RFP's (Request for Proposals) to people that the Commission is familiar with and that the Historic Preservation Office recommends. He stated that the benefit of staying with Todd and Jody is that they are the consultants doing the inventory and they are familiar with the vast majority of structures in the County. He stated that Catherine Bisher feels that Todd and Jody can do a good job writing/preparing the manuscript. It will be up to the Commission to provide the guidance in what is wanted. He further stated that if an RFP is sent out, you might possibly get someone who would do the manuscript for the amount of money involved and who had the word processing skills necessary to do a draft layout. He stated that he is looking for guidance from the Commission as to how to go about hiring a consultant for the manuscript. Ward clarified that technical skills are good to have. He stated that it would be nice to get someone with both technical skills and knowledge. Anderson stated that she would like to see Todd and Jody's work before she made any decision about them. White agreed with Anderson. She stated that her first reaction is to take someone who is familiar with the area. She stated that she would like to DATE 6717 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF ORANGE COUNTY 1993 ITEM SURVEY AND PLANNING GRANT PROJECT DESCRIPTION SECTION 1 . INTRODUCTION This project description is for an archaeological survey of portions of Orange County , North Carolina, to be conducted using a Survey and Planning Grant from the National Park Service of the U . S. Department of the Interior , as administered by the North Carolina Division of Archives and History ( hereinafter the Division) . The survey will he carried out by the Research Laboratories of Anthropology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill for Orange County. This description identifies the overall objectives , general approaches, reporting format, significant personnel , and schedule for the project. SECTION 2. PERSONNEL Mr . Marvin Collins shall serve as Project. Coordinator and Dr. Vincas Steponaitis shall serve as Principal Investigator (hereinafter the for the project. Ms. Dolores A. Hall , Office of State Ar- chaeology , shall serve as Project Specialist and contact for the Division . Additional project personnel , including the Principal Consultant, shall be identified by the P. I . in consultation with the Project. Specialist as necessary and desired in accordance with the budget schedule below. Personnel employed for field or laboratory supervisors must, however, meet the professional qualifications criteria set forth by the National Park Service, Department of the Interior, in 36 CFR Part 66 (fade".41_1N21*Ur 42 ( 19 ) , 1977 ) . SECTION 3. BUDGET The project shall adhere to the budget schedule (Attachment A) and the accounting procedures defined in the Project Memorandum of Agreement (Attachment B) . The Project Coordinator and the P. I . , in coordination with the Principal Consultant, shall be responsible for maintaining all accounting documentation for the project. Additional stipulations pertaining to the budget are identified in the Appendix of this Description . SECTION 4. PROJECT SCHEDULE The project shall begin on or after July 1 , 1993 , and shall end on or before September 30 , 1994. SECTION 5. PROJECT OBJECTIVES The primary objective of the project is to conduct a survey of the archaeological resources contained within certain portions of Orange County . The survey will be accomplished by background research and a reconnaissance level survey to identify areas with a high probability of containing prehistoric and historic sites. High probability areaswill then be more intensively examined . Areas to be investigated will be selected in consultation with the Project Specialist after preliminary background research . Emphasis shall be placed on those areas under pressure from development, areas likely to contain Middle Woodland occupations and areas likely to contain 18th and 19th century homesteads . The project is a part of a long-range research program in Orange County designed to enhance current knowledge concerning the nature and distributions of archaeological sites associated with both prehistoric and early historic occupation in the eastern Piedmont. Archaeological sites identified during the survey shall be evaluated with respect to the National Register of Historic Places criteria and recommendations will be made for subsequent research and preservation planning . A. formal report shall present the project results. SECTION 6. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project will be conducted in accordance with the proposal abstract presented in Attachment C (as it pertains to the archaeological survey ) . In addition , the project shall adhere to the following conditions: ( 1 ) The survey methods employed during the project may consist of subsurface, testing , but such testing shall not expand to the level of archaeological excavation under this grant. Where testing is conducted , all fill dirt shall be screened through 1 /4" mesh hardware cloth to recover archaeological artifacts . ( 2 ) No archaeological feature or human burial shall be excavated under this grant without specific consultation with the Project. Specialist. ( 3 ) All archaeological sites identified during the project will be recorded on North Carolina Archaeological Site Forms (to be furnished by the Division ) . (4) All areas surveyed will be clearly marked on U . S.G. S. 7 . 5 ) topographic maps. ( 5 ) All work conducted under this grant shall be consistent with the Secretary of the Interior 's Standards and Guidelines for Archeological Documentation ( Federal Register 48( 190 ) ) . Following completion of the field survey, the P. I . will complete all artifact and data analysis and shall prepare a complete report on the project activities for submission to the Division ( see Section 7 ) . SECTION 7 . PROJECT REPORTING ( 1 ) Tritprlm_Reppyts. On or before September 1 , 1993 , the P. I . shall prepare and submit to the Division a brief - Interim - report on the grant activities to date. Subsequent interim reports shall be submitted on or before the following dates : November 1 , 1993 January 1 , 1994 March 1 , 1994 May 1 , 1994 The report shall note any significant results or findings of the research , specific problems encountered during the work , recommendations or requests for any amendments to the terms of this description , and the projected schedule for project completion if different from that defined by this agreement. ( 2:1 Praft Finaj Report. The P. I . shall prepare and submit to the Division a complete draft report on or before July 1 , 1994. The report shall include but not be limited to the following :: (a) Abstract: containing summary information on the objectives and results of the project. (b) Introduction: including but not limited to sponsorship of the project and funding sources (with specific reference to the U . S. Department of the Interior and the North Carolina Division of Archives and History ; see also Appendix) (c) Rapkgrounsl: including a discussion of the background research conducted on the archaeological and environmental context of the project. (d) SAiryeyoKetboas: including discussions of the sampling or other survey area selection criteria, the survey techniques, and other data collection techniques employed during the project. (e) ProjecteResults: including discussions of the findings of the survey , artifactual analyses , and any locational analyses conducted during the project. Descriptions , drawings , photographs and tables of cultural materials and investigated sites should be included in these discussions . (f) Conclusions, evaluation OJLJ recommendations: including site- specific evaluations of research and preliminary National Register of Historic Places significance and recommendations for future research and planning . (g) Tablesma_ps and figures: including lists of artifacts, photographs of artifacts and sites, and maps of surveyed areas ( using U . S .( . S. Quadrangle maps) . (h) North Carolina Archaeologjcal Site_Forms,: All archaeological sites identified during the project shall be recorded on site forms furnished by the Division . For previously recorded sites, an update of old information shall be provided by the P. I . to the Division . [N.Q. : All archaeological site references in the final report must employ official State Archaeological Site number designations. Specific site location information should not be included in the body of the report., but may be included as detachable appendices. ] (3) firialopprt. Following submission of the draft final report by the P. 1 . , the Division shall have 30 days to review the report and communicate all necessary or recommended changes to the P. I . prior to preparation of the final project report. On or before September 30 , 1994, the P. I . shall submit five (5 ) copies of the final report to the Division . [Note: The Final Project. Report should be single- spaced and fully paginated . ] The Division retains all editorial , reproduction, pubTication , and distribution rights to the project report. Arrangements may be made , - however, between the Division for waiver of these rights. Any subsequent use of the report, documentation or results of the project by Orange County and/or the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill shall include appropriate recognition of the funding sources for the project. SECTION S. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY THE DIVISION The Division shall provide the P. I . with all necessary computer' adapted North Carolina Archaeological Site Forms during the project, and shall make available any and all information currently available in its files which may be pertinent to the effective completion of the project. SECTION 9. CURATORIAL RESPONSIBILITIES Under the terms of this agreement, all materials, records, photographs , maps, and other documentation generated by this project remain the property of the State of North Carolina, Arrangements will he made between the Division , Orange County and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill for the curation of all or a portion of these items following completion of the project. SECTION 10. ADDITIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR It shall be the responsibility of the P. I . to obtain proper permission to conduct investigations and temporarily or permanently remove any artifacts or other materials from privately owned properties . The P. I . shall also be responsible for obtaining any permits required for conducting archaeological investigations on state or federally owned 1 ands SECTION 11 . AGREEMENT In consideration of the signing of this Contract for the performance of work and furnishing of labor and materials as set forth herein , the parties hereto for themselves, their agents, officials, and employees or servants agree not to discriminate in any manner on the basis of age, handicap, sex , race, color, creed , sexual orientation , or national origin with reference to the subject matter of this Contract, no matter how remote . This provision is hereby incorporated into this Contract for the benefit of the Grantee and may be enforced by action for specific performance, injunctive relief , or other remedy as by law provided . This project description and ..t:achments are hereby agreed to on this _41';6 day of _ _ 1993 . For Orange County: For the Division of Archives and Histor : i JIC4tTI Moses Carey, Chair / avid Brook, Deputy Board of Commissioners State Historic Preservation Officer Attest: Aor Beverly B T5 "he Clerk to board of Commissioners For UNC - Chapel Hill: Aeting for Robert . Lowman Robert P• bo�,�,a Director of Research Services Principal Investigator: Dr. Vincas Steponaitis Research Laboratories of Anthropology 5 . /\TT&CH.MENT .� ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF ORANGE COUNTY 1993 BUDGET This budget includes only cash portion of grant. BACKGROUND RESEARCH 2592 Project Supervisor ( 18 days/$10 per hour ) Research Assistant ( 18 days/$8 per h{/Ur ) FIELDWORK 9360 Project Supervisor (45 dnya/$10 per hour) Research Assistants (2 ) ( 90 days/$8 per hour) ANALYSIS, REPORT PREPARATION, ETC 4320 Project Supervisor ( 18 days/$10 per hour) Research Assistants ( 2 ) (45 days/$8 per hour) TRAVEL 1728 7680 miles @. 225/mile INDIRECT COSTS 2000 TOTAL $20,000 { �d STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE DIVISION OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBGRANT AGREEMENT 1 - : This Subgrant Agreement is entered into this 15th day of March, 1993 by the State Historic Preservation Office (HPO) , hereafter known as the HPO, and Orange County, Grantee, for and- in consideration of a federal grant in the amount 'of $15, 000 (fifteen thousand dollars) , for the purpose of manuscript preparation of the Orange County architectural survey, and conducting an archaeological survey of selected areas within Orange County. The project must be completed no later than September 30, 1994. SUBGRANTEE STANDARDS: The Subgrantee agrees to: have a satisfactory record of performance; comply with the required completion schedule for the project; conform with debarment requirements; and be otherwise qualified and eligible to receive a grant award under applicable laws and regulations. AGREEMENT: The Subgrantee agrees to match the grant with funds or services from nonfederal sources within the grant period, to use grant and matching funds or services for the purpose specified above, and to furnish such reports-and documentation, financial or otherwise, as may be specified by the HPO. Project activities shall be performed according to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Archaeology and Historic Preservation, under the guidelines and professional supervision of the HPO. APPENDIX FOR SUBGRANT AGREEMENTS: The Subgrantee agrees to the stipulations contained in the attached "Appendix for Subgrant Agreements" . The Appendix shall be attached to all contracts involving project activities. PAYMENT OF GRANT FUNDS: The HPO agrees to reimburse the Grantee up to 60% of all expenditures for the project as described. Upon request the HPO may advance the Grantee up to 25% of the HPO's share of the project cost. After satisfactory documentation of this advance, including at least 40% matching share, additional advances may be requested. Final payment of grant funds will be paid only after satisfactory project completion. G T STATE HISTORIC /�� PREu .;NATION OFFICE ifialair 111 A i AO o n M. Link, ounty Manager Signature and title Depu y State Historic Preservation Officer April 6, 1993 Dat a-itt: -P �� / 3 29_ Date . , i ATTACHMENT C Since'the inception of its comprehensive planning program, a oal of Orange ' County has been the completion of detailed inventories of itts•cultu al, 'histor4.cal, ' ` recreational, biological, and geological resources: In 1986, the P1 nning Department ''': completed a general listing of, such sites in the unincorporated o Lions o P P �� of the county.: While some field surveys were conducted for site verification purpo es, ' the listing was 4. based exclusively on existing documentation. • f' h. 1'I , In 1988, a Master Recreation and Parks Plan was prepared -for range County. E j . During the same year, the Triangle Land Conservancy completed an Inventory of Natural 1.. Areas and Wildlife Habitats of Orange County. These studies provided; the detailed inventory of recreational, !ti' Y , geological, and biological sites, ; ;: . Consistent with the above goal, in January, 1991, Orange Couny ,applied for �' I ii , Survey and Planning Grant Funds to undertake an inventory of histor 1c sites and j? structures in the unincorporated portions of Chapel 'Hil1`Township, the most populous ;,,• •i and urbanized of the county's seven townships. . I ' h;" Followin notice of the . 9 grant award in May of 19IA, the inventory project was • begun in December and completed in June of 1992.' Based on the inventory conducted by the consultants, the area contained 159 structures of significance. III The Chapel Hill Township inventor was,the first 'of a four- h se f Y p project: The ,,. 4 second phase, and the one for which Planning and Survey Grant Fundsl!are being used now, v consists of an inventory of the remaining unincorporated portions of the 'county. Notice of the grant award occurred in May, 1992, and contracts with the consultants were ' signed in December. To date, a planning phase and four of 13 phasesjof the s', comprehensive survey have been completed. When completed in July o0993, approximately H t 700 sites of historical significance will have been identified and surveyed. As noted in the 1992 grant application, the third phase,: and the one for which Planning and Survey Funds are being requested; will consist of two parts,. including the ;,. publication of a county-wide inventory and an inventory of archaeological sites. Y. r.. y,,. • • Although Orange County will seek the support of municipalities and private interests in y u. the actual publication of the inventory, funds are being rec,�uested to, employ a1, , • I , • consultant to prepare the manuscript and collect photographs for the inventory .!. e. document. A consultant will also be sought to undertake the archaeological survey. The survey is a spin-off of the historic sites/structures inventory in that.a doctoral k . candidate at the University of North Carolina was employed as an intern by the Planning !! Department to follow behind the work of the consultants in the Chapel Hill Township 5 • survey, seeking to identify archaeological sites at each location which may be worthy I; of more detailed investigation. The intern is 'also reviewing ,the existing record of archaeological sites in the county in order to assess their potential, relative to National Register criteria. The work of the Planning Intern will be incorporated into f•' the survey strategy described below, and known sites that appear eligible for ,' r. I is nomination to the National Register will be investigated to determine their current • ,F:: . status. The archaeological survey for which funds are requested will peek to identify and assess archaeological sites to compliment the architectural survey which is currently , ' being conducted in the remaining portions of the county. The survey will be k_'. accomplished by background research and a reconnaissance level survey to identify areas ;,.' 4 with a high probability of containing prehistoric and historic sites. High probability q,. areas will be further subjected to intensive surface survey as well,ias shovel and auger 4' • testing where ground surface conditions prevent a surface appraisal ! !' " • K In addition, the Planning Department will identify sections o the county where a- • t future development is likely to occur. These areas will also be subjected to intensive surface survey. Local artifact collectors and other persons knowledgeable of archaeological and historic sites in Orange County will be interviel�ed and their {G collections inventoried. Al]. sites recorded will be subjected to a ppreliminary' 11 t', li p i r ii ' f 1 evaluation in terms of their potential for meeting criteria of eligibility fox', '1 inclusion on the National Regioter of Historic Places. t After the field survey is completed, a final report will be repared in I . • accordance with guidelines provided by the ,Office of State Archae !o J gy. The results of the archaeological survey as well as the architectural survey will be used in Ali completing the fourth phase of Orange County's program, curently scheduled for 1994. That phase will consist of preparation of an Historic Preservation Element as part of the Comprehensive Plan and nominations for the National Register of!Historic Places. With the assistance of a consultant, the Planning' Department will prepare the Historic Preservation Element. The consultant will also prepare the National.,Register nominations. All phases will be subject to local funding' approval as wellIus the availability . } of Planning and Survey Grant Funds:' A 'j Ii i i . I 7 APPENDIX for SUBGRANT AGREEMENTS The following stipulations apply to all subgrant projects funded in part by federal Historic Preservation Fund (HPF) monies awarded to the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources , Division of Archives and History , State Historic Preservation Office (HPO) , by the U . S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. References to the stipulations may be addressed in the GRANTU la6ADBOW. SDRVEY AND PLANUING GRANTS , as indicated below. Questions about the application of these conditions to specific projects are available from the specialists assigned to subgrant projects or from Lloyd D. Childers, grants administrator, 109 E. Jones St. , Raleigh , NC 27601-2807 . Telephone: ( 919 ) 733-4763 . 1 . PROCUREVENTO Subgrantees must forward to the HPO evidence of compliance with Federal competitive procurement requirements for professional services and subcontracts Dsior to reimbursement, if applicable . (see Handlaggl Federal Grant Requirements and Appendix: 43 CFR 12 . 36 ) 2 . RETENTION OF RECORDS: Acceptable Federal and nonfederal share supporting documentation must be submitted prior to reimbursement, if applicable. Documentation includes: copies of contract, timesheets , front and back of cancelled checks (or computer printouts) , invoices, etc . (see Handbook: Federal Grant Requirements and Appendix: 43 CFR 12 .41 and 12 .42 ) 3 . CHANGES IN SCOPE: The approved scope of work, products, budget and performance/reporting milestones included in the contract cannot be changed without prior written approval from the HPO. (see HAndlmoK: Contracts and Project Descriptions) 4 . LOBBYING PROHIBITED: Subgrantees must conform with the following text of 18 U . S.C. 1913 , which prohibits the use of the subgrant funds for lobbying : No part of the money appropriated by any enactment of Congress shall, in the absence of express authorization by Congress, be used directly or indirectly to pay for any personal service, advertisement, telegram, telephone, letter, printed or written matter, or other device, intended or designated to influence in any manner a Member of Congress, to favor or oppose by vote or otherwise, any legislation or appropriation by Congress, whether before or after the introduction of any bill or resolution proposing such legislation or appropriation; but this shall not prevent officers or employees of the United States or its Department or agencies from communication to Members of Congress on the request of any Member or to Congress, through the proper official channels, requests for legislation or appropriations which they deem necessary for the efficient conduct of the public business. 8 ., 5 . NON-FEDERAL AUDIT: Subgrantees are responsible for obtaining audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act of 1984 for State or local governments, or the audit requirements of OMB Circular A- 110 for universities and nonprofit. organizations . The audits shall be made by an independent auditor in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards covering financial and compliance audits. (see HaadhaQL: Appendix: 43 CFR 12 . 26 ) 6 . PUBLICATIONS. Acknowledgement of federal grant assistance should be made in connection with the publication of any material based on , or developed under , any activity supported by HPF grant funds, as follows: The activity that is the subject of this (type of publication) has been financed ( in part/entirely) with Federal funds from the National Park Service, Department of the Interior. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior. NOTE: The design and content of any publication produced from a survey of architectural or archaeological resources must be reviewed and approved by the HPO 111:_inr to its printing . 7 . SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF SUBGRANT. Voluntary and involuntary suspension or termination of the subgrant, in whole or in part, by either the State or subgrantee may occur at any time prior to the date of project completion . (see Handbos2E: Appendix: 43 CFR 12 . 43 , 12 .44) 8 . STANDARDS FOR FINAL PRODUCTS. Final products which do not conform to the terms and conditions of the grant agreement or which do not meet the applicable Secretary of the interior' s "Standards" will not be reimbursed . (see Handbook: Appendix: Standards and Guidelines) 9 . EQUAL OPPORTUNITY. Subgrantee must comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. (see HandbooL: Federal Grant Requirements) 10 . OTHER REQUIREMENTS: In addition to the terms detailed in this Subgrant Agreement, all Federal requirements governing grants are appl icable. (Office of Management and Budget Circulars A-87 or A- 121 , A-102 or A-110 , and A-128) Prepared by : Lloyd D. Childers', Grants Administrator Historic Preservation Office, Division of Archives and History October , 1990 U.S. Department of the Interior fi TO BE COMPLETED BY CONTRACTOR(S) Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion Lower Tier Covered. Transactions � 4 This certification is required by the regulations implementing Executive Order 12549, Debarment and Suspension,43 CFR Part 12, Section 12.510, Participants' responsibilities. The regulations were published as Part VII of the May 26, 1988 Federal Register (pages 19160-19211). Copies of the regulations are included in the proposal package. For further assistance in obtaining a copy of the regulations, contact the U.S. Department of the Interior,Acquisition and Assistance Division, Office of Acquisition and Property Management, 18th and C Streets, N,W.,Washington, D.C. 2040. (BEFORE COMPLETING CERTIFICATION,READ INSTRUCTIONS! REVERSE) (1) The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this proposal, that neither it nor its principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible,or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any Federal department or agency. (2) Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification,such prospective participant shall atta h an explanation to this proposal. c1 vi Vincas Steponaitis Name and Title of Authorized Representative 7 7/ S Signature Date DI.1954 (91$) Instructions for Certification I. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective lower tier participant is providing the certification set out below. 2. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this trr =tion was entered into. If it is later determined that the prospective lower tier pa.;. . ,zpa.nt knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue availah'Le remedies, including suspension and/or debarment. 3. The prospective lower tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the person to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective lower tier participant learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. 4. The terms "covered transaction," "debarred," "suspended,""ineligible," "lower tier covered transaction," "participant,""person," "primary covered transaction," "principal," "proposal," and "voluntarily excluded," as used in this;clause, have the meanings set out in the Definitions and Coverage sections of rules implementing _Executive Orderly 2549__Yau may contact the_person to which thi_aproposal is submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations. 5. The prospective lower tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency with which this transaction originated. 6. The prospective lower tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include this clause titled "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion-Lower Tier Covered Transaction," without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all soliciations for lower tier covered transactions. 7. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant may decide the method and frequency by which it determines the eligibility of its principals. Each participant may, but is not required to, check the Nonprocurement List(Tel.#). S. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that — which is normally possessed-b ,-a prudent pereon in the ordinary course of business dealings. 9. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 5 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is suspended,debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies,including suspension and/or debarment. •