HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 04-20-1993 - VII-A 1.
ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Action Agenda
Item No. V.TS-A
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: April 20, 1993
SUBJECT: OWASA REPORT
DEPARTMENT: COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING YES: NO: X
ATTACHMENT(S) : YES - REPORT INFORMATION CONTACT: MOSES CAREY
TELEPHONE NUMBER -
Hillsborough - 732-8181
Chapel Hill - 968-5401
Durham - 688-7331
Mebane - 227-2031
PURPOSE: To report to the Board of County Commissioners and to
demonstrate the capabilities of their GIS system.
BACKGROUND: At the County Commissioners goal setting retreat in December,
1991, the Board asked that OWASA provide them with information quarterly.
This report covers six months.
RECOMMENDATION(S) : Receive the report for information.
•
2.
Orange Water and Sewer Authority
400 Jones Ferry Road
I OWASA l P.O. Box 366
J Carrboro, NC 27510
'ems/ (919) 968-4421
REPORT TO THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
MARCH 23, 1993
Cane Creek Reservoir
As you probably know, OWASA opened the Cane Creek Reservoir recreation area last
December. Public response has been enthusiastic, with usage far above previous seasonal levels
recorded at University Lake. We hope to host an open house at Cane Creek for the entire Orange
County community later this year. In the meantime, feel free to contact our staff if you'd like to
arrange a personal visit. (And, don't forget that University Lake is now closed.to the public,
scheduled to reopen when major dam renovations are completed next year.)
In accord with its longstanding policy of ensuring the primary use of OWASA's reservoirs as
public water supplies, the Board of Directors voted to prohibit the use of all private watercraft at
Cane Creek, as well as gasoline motors, except for safety, patrolling, and scientific purposes.
The Authority does provide rental rowboats, canoes, and electric trolling motors.
Regarding watershed protection at Cane Creek, OWASA staff continue to collect monitoring data
from the lake and its tributaries, and we're proceeding with appointment of an advisory committee
to assist with the Cane Creek watershed study. It is unlikely that any firm recommendations will
be established before late in the 1993 calendar year, but I would remind you of two earlier
findings about Cane Creek:
The 1989 Camp Dresser McKee University Lake Watershed Study took a preliminary look at land
use/water quality issues in the Cane Creek watershed, and indicated that a satisfactory level of
protection might be achieved in Cane Creek with less stringent land use constraints than
An Equal Opportunity Employer
3.
OWASA Report to Orange County Commissioners
March 23, 1993
Page 2
recommended for University Lake. The principle reason for the difference is the greater depth
and volume of Cane Creek Reservoir, which enables it to assimilate a larger pollution load with
less apparent degradation than would occur at University Lake. Current County regulations
require 80,000 square foot minimum lots in the Cane Creek critical area (within about a half mile
of the reservoir), but allow 40,000 square foot lots throughout the rest of the watershed. These
current regulations are less stringent than is suggested by the preliminary Camp Dresser McKee
examination. The proposed study will provide definitive information on which to base future land
use regulations for the Cane Creek watershed.
Another Cane Creek issue in which the Board of Directors maintains a keen interest is the
potential landfill site adjacent to OWASA property at the reservoir. As transmitted to you and the
Landfill Siting Committee last year, Orange Water and Sewer Authority remains firmly opposed
to locating a landfill at Cane Creek.
Capital Projects
My last report to you noted that OWASA's Capital Improvements Program includes more than
$30 million dollars in projects for the five year planning period. Construction is underway on a
number of them, including the $1.2 million dollar Bolin Creek sewer line expansion in Chapel
Hill. A similar project is now being designed for the Booker Creek interceptor.
OWASA's sewer system performed remarkably well during the 3-inch rainfall of March 4. The
wastewater treatment plant continued to produce high quality effluent without experiencing any
process upsets or washouts, despite receiving the highest single day flow on record at the Mason
Farm Plant.
OWASA-Hillsborough Pipeline
4.
OWASA Report to Orange County Commissioners
March 23, 1993
Page 3
At its March 11 meeting, the Board of Directors voted unanimously to decline the Town of
Hillsborough's most recent offer to purchase the northernmost three miles of the 16-inch treated
water pipeline that interconnects the OWASA and Hillsborough water systems. Despite some
differences of technical opinion between our staff and Hillsborough's, the Board's decision was
based primarily on the policy finding that short term financial benefits to the Authority of selling
a portion of the pipeline would be outweighed by the potential costs of compromising a segment
of an areawide water transmission network that will become increasingly important in years to
come. The difference in cost between the Town's offer to purchase the pipeline and the estimated
construction cost of installing a new 12-inch main to Hillsborough's southern service area was
found to be only about 15 percent. We are confident that Hillsborough has the ability and
commitment to resolve its southern service area distribution problems in the near future.