HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 03-08-1993 - III-I O R A N G E C O U N T Y
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: March 8, 1993
Action Agenda
Item # ?IC-I
SUBJECT: PLEASANT GREEN WOODS - PRELIMINARY PLAN
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes x No
ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Willis
Extension 2583
Resolution of Approval
Application
Vicinity Map TELEPHONE NUMBERS:
Sketch of Lots 11/12 Hillsborough - 732-8181
Preliminary Plan Durham - 688-7331,
Fiscal Impact Analysis Mebane - 227-2031
2/15/93 Planning Board Minutes (Draft) Chapel Hill - 967-9251
PURPOSE: To consider the Preliminary Plan for Pleasant Green Woods
Subdivision.
BACKGROUND: The property is located on the east side of Pleasant Green
Road between Willett Road and Cole Mill Road. The
property is known as Lots 3A and 4 of Tax Map 24 , Eno
Township.
The tract contains 32 .7 acres. There are 19 residential
lots proposed, ranging from 1. 01 to 2 . 43 acres and
averaging 1. 37 acres in size. An additional 3 . 7 acres is
contained in common area. The property is zoned Rural
Residential and is designated as Rural Residential in the
Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. It is not
located within any watershed or other zoning overlay
district. .
The twenty lots proposed in this Preliminary Plan
represent only the first phase of Pleasant Green Woods.
The total tract contains 155 acres and 102 lots. A second
Preliminary Plat will be submitted within several months,
and will include the remaining four phases of the
development. A sketch of the entire development is
attached. The Concept Plan for the entire tract was
approved by the Planning Board on November 16, 1992 .
Watersupply and wastewater disposal will be provided by
individual wells and septic tanks. The Orange County
Division of Environmental Health initially indicated that
soil suitable for a septic system and repair area was not
found on Lot 11. Since the initial inspection suitable
2
soils have been located. The boundary between Lot 11 and
Lot 12 will be re-surveyed as shown on the attached map so
that Lot 10 will contain sufficient area for a septic
system and repair area. The remaining lots were found to
be provisionally suitable for development.
The Orange County Fire Marshall commented that a turn-
around area for emergency vehicles was needed at the end
of Jomali Road. A T-turnaround will be constructed in a
manner which allows for future road extension.
Comments were also received from the County Engineer and
the Erosion Control Supervisor. The County Engineer
indicated that portions of several lots contain fairly
steep slopes, and that drainage easements may be needed in
some areas. The Erosion Control Officer indicated that
approval of an erosion control plan and grading permit
would be required prior to any disturbance.
The Fiscal Impact Analysis of the development is attached.
The analysis includes all 102 lots included in the Concept
Plan, with an anticipated build-out of 3 years.
The Planning Board considered the proposed subdivision on
February 15, 1993 and recommended approval.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Director, recommends approval of the proposed
Preliminary Plan for Pleasant Green Woods with conditions
as contained in the attached Resolution of Approval.
3
RESOLUTION .1
OF THE
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMIVIISSIONERS
Date March 16, 1993
Name of Subdivision Pleasant Green Woods, Phase I
Owner/Applicant John M. Link. Sr.
The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves Pleasant Green Woods, Phase I
subdivision preliminary plat, dated December 17, 1992 and containing 20 lots, subject to the
fulfillment of requirements specified herein.
All roads shall be irrevocably dedicated to the general public and be constructed to standards
of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. The approval of this resolution
authorizes and directs the Orange County Manager to accept for Orange County and on
behalf of the public generally, the offer of dedication of Jomali Drive. This acceptance by
Orange County of the dedication to the general public of Jomali Drive shall be without
maintenance responsibility. These roads shall be maintained by the owner/applicant until
such time as they are accepted for maintenance by the North Carolina Department of
Transportation or some other governmental body. Before the Final Plat of any phase of
Pleasant Green Woods can be recorded:
A. Sewage Disposal
1. Each residential lot shall contain an adequate area for septic disposal, and
repair area, approved by the Orange County Division of Environmental
Health. The boundary between lots 11 and 12 must be revised to provide
adequate area on lot 11. In the event that sufficient area cannot be found, then
lot 11 shall be identified as being of restricted development potential in a
document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared
by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
2. Disclosure that the septic system location may restrict the size and location of
improvements shall be included in a document describing development
restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. The document
shall also disclose that information regarding the tentative location of septic
systems is available from the Orange County Health Department, Division of
Environmental Health.
4
B. Roads and Access
1. Jomali Drive shall be constructed to standards of the North Carolina
Department of Transportation, within a 50 foot right-of-way, and the
construction shall be inspected and approved by NCDOT.
OR
A letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond shall be submitted to secure
construction of Jomali Drive to the standards of the North Carolina
Department of Transportation. An estimate of the construction cost must be
prepared by a certified/licensed engineer or grading contractor and submitted
to the Planning and Inspections Department. The financial guarantee must
reflect 110% of that estimate and be issued by an accredited financial
institution licensed to do business in North Carolina.
The document describing development restrictions to be recorded with the
Final Plat shall state that the financial guarantee will not be released until the
road construction has been inspected and approved by NCDOT.
2. An erosion control plan for construction of the roads shall be submitted by the
applicant for review and approval by the Orange County Erosion Control
Division.
3. The intent for future extension of Jomali Drive shall be indicated on the Final
Plat by the words "Subject to Future Extension".
4. A 10' by 70' sight triangle shall be shown at the entrance of the subdivision.
5. All lots shall access onto the new subdivision roads. This restriction shall be
stated in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to
be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
6. Approved street name signs shall be erected at the intersection of streets as
required in Section IV-B-3-c-12 of the Orange County Subdivision
Regulations. Evidence shall be submitted by the applicant that the sign is in
place or a copy of the receipt for purchase of the sign shall be submitted to the
Planning Department.
C. Land Use Buffers and Landscaping
1. Landscaping shall be installed or preserved as indicated on the approved
landscape plan, and must be inspected and approved by the Planning and
Inspections Department.
OR
5
The applicant shall secure landscape requirement installation and preservation
through a letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond. An estimate of the cost
for required preservation, plantings and their installation must be provided.
The financial guarantee shall reflect 110% of the estimate and be issued by an
accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina.
2. Provisions for protection of existing trees as shown on the approved landscape
plan shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and
requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with
the Final Plat.
3. A Type A Land Use Buffer shall be provided along Pleasant Green Road. The
buffer shall be 30 feet in width and provide sufficient vegetation to meet the
standards of Section IV-B-8-e of the Subdivision Regulations. Said buffer
shall be so noted on the plat, and described in a document describing
development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff
and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
D. Parkland
1. Cash in the amount of $3,040.00 ($5,600/acre x 19/35 acre = $160/lot x 19
lots) shall be paid to Orange County as payment in lieu of parkland dedication.
E. Miscellaneous
1. The Final Plat shall contain a title block and vicinity map in accordance with
Section V-D-2 and V-D-3 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations.
2. A setback of 40 feet shall be maintained as measured from the edge of
right-of-way of Jomali Drive. Side yards shall be a minimum of 20 feet, and
rear yards a minimum of 20 feet. These setback requirements shall be stated
on the plat, and in a document describing development restrictions and
requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with
the Final Plat.
3. The area designated as open space on the Preliminary Plat shall be labelled as
lot 20, and all boundaries of the lot shall be surveyed on the Final Plat.
4. Lot 20 shall be irrevocably dedicated to the Homeowners Association for the
purpose of possible location of nitrification fields and/or repair areas and/or
recreation/open space. Any open space area used for subsurface wastewater
disposal shall be made inaccessible to pedestrian traffic except for that needed
for access and maintenance.
6
F. Certifications
1. A Certificate of Survey and Accuracy signed by a registered Land Surveyor
shall be notarized on the face of the Final Plat.
2. A Certificate of Declaration and Maintenance in the form provided in Section
V-D-6-b of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations signed by the
landowner and developer shall be on the face of the plat and included in a
document describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with
the Final Plat.
3. The Department of Environmental Health shall certify that each lot, except lot
11, contains a suitable area for septic disposal.
4. The North Carolina Department of Transportation shall certify that Jomali
Drive has been constructed to State standards or that construction plans have
been approved.
5. A Certificate of Approval shall be signed by the Orange County Planning and
Inspections Department on the face of the plat.
Signature of Applicant Clerk to the Board
, accept the above listed conditions of subdivision approval,
and acknowledge that each must be met prior to recordation of the final plat.
APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAN APPROYAL j ,
r',�,JOR SU6DIVlS1G a
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT (:NK oNL';)
ORANGE COUNTY
DATE:
12-16-1992
SUBDIVISION NAME: "PLEASANT GREEN WOODS
LOCATION: Pleasant Green Road
OWNER/DEVELOPER: John Link Sr. :3-3139
ADDRESS:
11 P easant Green ' . TELEPHONE No.:
Durham NC 27705
A1O1S Ca11emyn TELEPHONE NO.:
732-3883
AGENT/CONTACT:
104 N. Churton St.
Hillsborough NC 27278
A. SUMMARY INFORMATION: _ 3P 4 •
Township Eno
Orange County Tax Map 2
Block Lot(s)
Zoning District(s):
Phases: • 00.0 Total Number of Acres: 155+ acres Minimum Lo: S.ze � � ���
Total Number of Lots: 19 Average Lot Size: 1.+ ac. _ ��
(proposed) . ' •e - .u
Number/Type of Structures: (existing) +
Lineal Feet in Streets: 2000'+ Acres in Open Space 5.Q. ac
Community Individua:
Water Supply: Public (specify) eb 1C Indiv cual
Public (specify) Community
Wastewater Disposal: Fire District:School District:
General Land Uses in Area:
Rural residential
Critical Areas: stream/drainageways Dra ina Qe flood prone areas
one e
watershed (specify) historic arras
other (explain)
B. All plats must be submitted on sheet no smaller than one inch equals two-hundred feet (1"=200') and no large-
than one inch equals twenty feet (1"=20') and must contain the following information:
EE Mft
subdivision name 1 k ? zoning of tract and adjacent properties
. ) - f buiIcing setback lines by notation or typical lc:sk
.� :. name 8 address of owners
`- >:;:;:;:;: layout
_ name address of subdivider
C. (if caner than owner)
MO location and width of existing and proposed
G�r name of surveyor, engineer, easements (drainaoe, utilities, roads, etc.)
bWexisting, proposed and adjoining rignts-cf-way
landscape architect or architect, � names and sate
C address, registration rt and seal Ma including dimensions arc street
„� road numbers. Lineal feet of road centerlines and
`; (title) Preliminary Plan rcenterlinway
<:: approximate acreage of new street
.ti 0 scale, north arrrow including type,
existing and proposed utilities, 9
H date (including revision dates) hydrants valves, manholes
;' sizes y
C ?' township, tax map-block-lot , pro proposed curbs, gutters and culverts,
reverences
_- existing and p P
C including sizes and araoes
E Parent Parcel Identification sidewalks, bike lanes,
C s;:::zi ropers d location and width of alleys,:x•.17:: deed book and pace c' property T
^o
:`•- Transit systems, and bus stops
to be subdivided
described with bearings `l typical street cross-sections and intersection
.� boundary desc traveLua and
7. oetails including design and width c' Y
U-) and distances
total acreage of the tract and
:? shoulders
.......... acreage of lots, including and horizontal alignment and general curve data (puo'•ic
>< ac
excluding area within rights-of-way roads)
(:lease c o=l e V e reverse side)
AL :`i.:_n:: control corner 8
proposed lot lines with dimensions 4_ ' '&i::: centerline radius on all proposed street;
J
lot & block numbers -i- ::; Permanent features such as buildings, ceme,eries.
,..: .,-:., li .:.:::.. Historic landmarks
onasing lines
_/ ae)oining lot layout names of adjoining prcoert
u L topography at ten foot (10) intervals ) g y
"" O Gr owners. If subdivided, subdivision plat lace
PM water bodies, streams, floodway and
book & page number, and perimeter Lot numbers.
Q
UO cU floodolains
i w
_' landscaping and buffer requirement:.buffers
)l/
. :i: township, corporate and extra-territorial planning
cu location and size of Parcels dedicated
U _-:: for peptic use, recreational use or Jurisdiction lines which cross the property
location and size of lots of restricted aerelo ment
^; reserved in common, with purpose noted p
=_ potential and notation on plat regarding same
T i `_ impervious surface data (if located in
"� < ' stormwater detention and/or retention site; :.rd
is water supply watershed)
undisturbed areas for infiltration purposes (if -
-7 -:-.: , ::::::::::::::::::::::i:
'-: i'') 11, ::i::iii:.i vicinity map snowing general location
..`--/.' of subdivision with streets and roads located in water supply watershed)
1
identified by State road number and
name
C. OTHER SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
1. Twenty-five (25) copies of the preliminary plat.
2. One full size cooy of an Orange County lax map (with tax parcels involved clearly marked in pencil).
'3. Where municipal or OWASA sewer is not available, a cony of the Preliminary Plat indicating Health
Department soils analysis approval/denial for each lot shown thereon.
4. Where a private road is proposed a written statement by the applicant or his/her authorized representative
which secs forth the justification for a private road (see Section IV-B-3-d-1 of the Orange County
Subdivision Regulations).
5. Auxiliary documents, in draft form, prepared in accordance with Section VI of this Ordinance wnich assure
completion and/or maintenance of improvements required by this Ordinance. Such documents may include, but
not be limited to, a private road maintenance agreement, and articles of incorporation and restrictive
covenants pertaining to a homeowner's association. These cocuments may be required as necessary as
evidence that the ordinance requirements are being me:.
I, the applicant, hereoy certify that the foregoing application is complete and accurate. I understand that a
5105.00 fee (suodivisions of 1-5 Lots), 5210.00 fee (subdivisions of 6-9 lots), 5315.00 fee (suodivisions of 1C-25
lots) or a 5420.00 fee (subdivisions of 26 lots or more) is due at the time of application. A 55.00 per lot fee is
due et the time the final
plat is presented for recordation.
Ii
it/ ._y i `
APPLICANT'S SIGNA7URE
OWNER'S SIGNATURE
DATE G / Z
DA-_
FEES. Amoun:30 Date Paid ( 0 ece,p `7 t # 5 3/c--
,
4 9 3
cpit-- 3
,
9
,
8
i_ y2 rn 4 1, ebi e MIII .R
I'.
,.,
. . ,„„...7
A,..• os l''...°. r I,''. cw,„
,
1.10,44,"a'. ., IICSKK"' Kt row L',.•1.4..%,
\ , a• k 41
<2 ,
,4:-...•
/C)
/
' .
4 C ara
,/, .35
37 4 4
t ill
li
1111
\
,ma
2G 36
lik
,
to,,
/ ,/..(..,..e...,.
‘c•. .oco s2.,rx" ,I Ilk\ ...1.................,111 , ,c
*.oco na.cotst., .E 3,
-a :
eta 8-
/ o.E 37-! Ntscon.-
Re=Mt,
1714X5E 1 , ,
„ ,. ...,:.„ „ \ , ,.
, ,
- - 2.:
- II
.33
ThCtSCS 1E, -441 (t)10 .)7.1 ----.
4.b, \„a2.. subrn•cticed on LT 2
p,i 31.4112 rAttk ill
\f\exk ?c,6rni no r- ---- \o-i, .........,.
rn c\ ‘.CI Ct 3 ---__
, --.... p' 73 4 ilk / Nr
3,
10" / rnii
1.07=
I solIOMOM , .
4SWItr,.13-le
GaDIT'711;454'
RC=
Ka, '•L
■■/, 1,1730171A3.
Wit{ 72 it, ,„ 5.,
I
et&113-..-3, .
'
lir
it1254313177,
71' ,
75 76 //'
6C 78
---7
.---
\ 81
111,
--
eZ \ \ //
/,/ 4Illhillkh.... IIkcga :
,
/
--.......,, /
55.
,
,
, /
/ ' ...t,
• ' i.:*.
, 7C
\ 65 / 9. / /
A
/ .''Y'
64 \ 1 1
55 s5'j 57 / 5"
---______--•-•"' ‘, ,§..
!0 0. `, t' '..... 6•
, . ,
,
64 ../. I 1
se /
Jo, 1
96 Alkih'
1 1 / /
,
10: I 66 , •e.*,,,.. '-'";,1 'SI'
•/... ,
I i 1 I I 1:4 ,
/
. ;,3' / ■ ./r
c.....0
i 1 1,'(.. "
It E 5 4+1.N.
socf +-o
W.((et+- Rd
/
10 ,/ ___.— . —•2—
y
/ *.,•`''
/
74(\ l'.144 / ,„ 4
/
c.....)\A"
.
./ ,..\
.. •... .
,....„ /
./. 6....b ,-, ...
,.,..., ,,,,..„.., .., ,...• c...Q; A-.
\ ,
t•-■ Y.,/ 0'
,• ,
..•( ' ‘C./.'t
••-•s t,' ' a'
• ''''c .' c P 't' C.C'' ."(i
(\,"
4r•
. ., ,2
/ \SC, % i ,-, ,...., ■ • C• r '''
v ..,
/ q) / C,
. • A-,
^
VI •D`
■•/ , \''/
2\., < ‘••-
.....„. ,,
1 .83 A c .
1 . 1 4 • c .
.,,,. ,.. ,
/ (-,,, f,
. /7 A) i
N.
' 0
C,_..)
CZ/
/ —
,r,....") .., --s--
,
‹.,
' , 4..,:-'
/7/ / .
/
/
(-2 -) /.: C 1 4rit ....
, ,v ( )
I.> '
/ t.'" ' ,
Prr
N, / SU ,...<4
\ /// / ., ,0 qb
cv ).
/
. .. • co '',
.., c,.,x /
•
1 1 c,
, (..
, ,,
/ _, , 1 2 .
13
.
2 . 4 3 Ac. .
c e„/
1 0 0 Ac. .00
. co ... .2 0 Ac.
,•
.,•
7 ,,•,, ,, tt...././
/
„ , c„, \ o•-•, .
, „. . a_ , • :
, 0,-, ,, c.., •
....--7
4..,.. ,•
\'■ / / 10' ADDITIONAL DED/CA TED R.W. "—I -
.
.:12.9',ITROL CORNER ,
, .`,' L'-40049.03 '
/
I-- '...- E 1999149.32
-.
436.5:-. 1 55.2 ' 218.00'
/ ....-
TIE
c
• N 89'45'14 E
N 6126'57” 1812.49 TOTAL
• 21.09' :. SE.E NOTE "r
.:..
LOT 1
GREENWOOD SUBDI V!SI ON
P.S. 37-187
c.'ES'iD EN T AL
� ,
FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR PLEASANT GREEN WOODS SUBDIVISION
SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH
Prepared by
The Orange County Planning Department
February, 1993
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Pleasant Green Woods is a proposed 102-lot major subdivision located on the east side
of Pleasant Green Road (SR 1567) between Willet Road (SR 1568) and Cole Mill Road (SR
1569) . The average lot size is 1.52 acres, including street rights-of-way. All lots
will be served by individual wells and septic tanks, and public roads.
For Pleasant Green Woods, project build-out is estimated at three years (approximately
34 lots per year) . Housing units will be constructed, beginning in 1994, with
completion of the project scheduled for 1996. Units will consist of detached single-
family homes, and the applicant estimates the average sales price to be $190,000,
including the lot.
METHODOLOGY
Fiscal impact analysis is a projection of the direct, current, public costs and
revenues associated with residential and non residential growth in the jurisdiction in
which the growth is taking place. Fiscal impact analysis considers only direct impact
in that it projects only the primary costs that will be incurred and the immediate
revenues that will be generated. It calculates the financial effect of a planned
development or new subdivision by considering the current costs and revenues such a
development would generate if it were completed and occupied today. Fiscal impact
analysis does not consider the private costs of public action. It is concerned only
with public (governmental) costs and revenues.
The method used in preparing the fiscal impact analysis of Pleasant Green Woods is the
Service Standard Approach. While only gross expenditures by service category are
derived from the Per Capita Method, the Service Standard method determines the total
number of additional employees by service function that will be required as a result of
growth. This method employs average county government costs per person, average school
costs per pupil, an employee to population ratio, and average operating expenses per
employee for each service category and school district. The number of new employees
are projected and multiplied times the average operating expenses (includes personnel,
operating and capital costs) per employee. These average costs are then weighed
against per capita and per pupil revenues to project the total net fiscal impact of the
development.
12
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH
PROJECT FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Section 1 - Project Data
Project Name, Township, School District
Beginning Year, Ending Year, Inflation
Characteristics of Households
Construction Schedule/Cost Data
Section 2 - Local Government and School District Data
Budget Year
Per Capita Revenues
Per Capita Expenditures
Per Student Expenditures
School District Per Employee Expenditures
Employees Per 1000 Population
County Per Employee Expenditure
Other Data
Other Model Constants
School District Data
Section 3 - Demographic Projections Based On Project Data
Total Housing
Total Population
School Children
Additional County Employees
Total
School District Additional Employees
Section 4 - Projected Net Fiscal Impact on County
Tax Base
Revenues
Expenditures
Net Fiscal Impact
Section 5 - Projected Net Fiscal Impact on School District
Revenues
Expenditures
Net Fiscal Impact
Section 6 - Summary of Projected Impacts
Additional Housing
Additional Population
Additional School Children
Tax Base
County Government Balance
School District Balance
Total Net Fiscal Impact
EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND DATA SOURCES
13
EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND DATA SOURCES
SECTION 1 - PROJECT DATA
Project data includes information about the specific development project. Much, if not
all, of the information is supplied by the applicant. Data inputs include:
Project Name: Name of the project.
Township: Township in which the project is located.
School Districts School district in which the project is located.
Beginning Year: The first year of the project in which dwelling units are completed and
occupied.
Ending Year: The last year in which dwelling units are completed and occupied. The
template is set to calculate fiscal impacts for a ten-year period.
Inflation Rate: Unless an inflation rate is entered, the template will calculate fiscal
impacts based on constant dollars. Since the inflation rate changes from month to
month, the Finance Department must be contacted for the most recent figure.
Persons/Household: The estimated average number of persons/household (dwelling unit) .
If this information is not supplied by the applicant, a figure will be supplied by the
Orange County Planning Department based on 1990 Census data for the township in which
the project is located.
Children/Households The estimated average number of school age children/household
(dwelling unit) . If this information is not supplied by the applicant, a figure will be
supplied by the Orange County Planning Department based on 1990 Census data for the
township in which the project is located.
% Non-Elderly: N.C. General Statutes permit an $11,000 exemption to the elderly and
disabled who meet certain income criteria. In the event that elderly units are part of
the project, the percentage of eligible non-elderly units is entered. The tax base
will automatically be adjusted to reflect the exemption.
Number of Homes: The number of dwelling units to be constructed in the project in each
year as based on estimates by the developer.
Average Sales Price: The average sales price of all dwelling units based on the number
and sales price of dwelling unit types to be constructed in each year as provided by
the developer.
14
SECTION 2 - LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA
Local government data includes information regarding expenditures required to provide
County services and revenues received based on the approved Orange County budget for
the fiscal year in which the project is considered for approval. All information
derived from the approved budget remains constant throughout a fiscal year (July-June)
and is changed only with the approval of a new budget.
Local government revenue and expenditure information is compiled on a per capita (per
person) basis. Per capita figures are derived by dividing the total expenditures for a
particular service function or revenue source by the estimated population of Orange
County for the year in which the project is considered for approval. Populations
estimates are prepared by the Planning Department.
Data inputs include the following:
Budget Year: The current fiscal year; i.e. , 1992-93.
Per Capita Revenues: The sources of revenue by major category are as follows:
Taxes - Other Than Property: Revenues from taxes other than property taxes include
those from sales and use taxes, franchise taxes, and animal taxes.
Intergovernmental Aid: Revenues from this source, in the form of categorical aid or
shared-tax revenues, are provided through State and federal assistance programs.
Service Charges: Service (or user) charges support numerous functions and are charged
to those who voluntarily receive governmental services or use governmental facilities.
Miscellaneous: Miscellaneous revenues include interest earnings on investments,
proceeds from license and permit fees, and all other revenues.
Per Capita Expenditures: Expenditures by major category are as follows:
General Government: Services related to the legislative, administrative, financial, and
legal functions of government.
Public Safety: Law enforcement services and emergency medical services.
Public Works: Efforts related to the maintenance of County-owned property and the
provision of sanitation (solid waste disposal) services.
Human Services: Departments responsible for the provision of health, social, and
recreation-related services.
Education: Orange County supports two school units, the Orange County school system and
the Chapel Hill\Carrboro school system. This category includes appropriations made to
the designated school system for Recurring Capital items. Recurring Capital funds are
used for general maintenance, purchase of new equipment/furnishings and vehicle
maintenance.
Non-Departmental: Contributions to agencies providing cultural and social services
outside the formal structure of county government. Other expenditures include
equipment replacement and contingency funds. Although there are no employees generated
by this category, it has been included as an operating expenditure. It will be
included in Section 4, "Total Annual County Expenditure." These expenditures will be
calculated on a per capita basis as opposed to a per employee basis.
Per Student Expenditures: Information regarding expenditures required to provide
educational services and revenues received are based on the approved school system
budgets for the fiscal year in which the project is considered for approval. All
pw. E
15 s
approved budgets information derived from the app s remains constant throughout a fiscal year g
(July-June) and is changed only with the approval of new budgets.
Ex enditure information is compiled on a per student basis for County Government
P
Current Expense,are SusedlforsgeneralnoperationppurposeslincludingnInstructionnanduSupport
Expense funds a
Balances. Federal
beenrevenues
included since expenditures
areand
nottdirectlylocal
growthrevenues
related.asPer Fund
student
Baguree have not
particular are derived btheiestimated the
number of appropriation
tofor
be enrollednin thepapplicablea
school syr emu for by
school system for the year in which the project is considered for approval. Student
enrollments are obtained from the approved school system budgets.
County systems bt: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations to the
school systems by Orange County for Current Expense. The minimum level of per student
appropriation is determined by the State Board of Education.
School District: in
system of
school system m and are
a supplementary school tax.
State: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations from the State Board
of Education.
School District Per Employee Eopriations, Expenditures
School District and St PP
employees.
Employees Per 1000 Population: The number of employees in a particular service category
per 1000 population.
County Per Employee Expenditure: The average operating and
capital expenses precludes
employee in a particular service category. Total
personnel, operating and capital costs.
Other Data:
County Government Tax The operating expend0ttures,assessed
p
the per capita method reduced
by an amount equal to the debt service payments for capital projects.
School District Tax Rate: The supplementary tax assessed on behalf of the Chapel Hill-
Carrboro school system.
information ratio of
TaxmOffice.sThesassessment ratio s based on market
valuemtoion esse by
value to assessed value for the purpose of computing the tax base.
Other Model Constants
Elderly Exemption: For projects developed partially or exclusively for elderly (65 and
older) or disabled individuals whose annual income does not exceed $12,000, an $11,000
tax exemption is used in projecting the tax base.
School District Data:
Employees Per Student: The number of employees per student in a specific school
district.
16
SECTION 3 DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA
Demographic projections provide information about the number of new residents and
school children anticipated in Orange County resulting from project development.
Projections also provide the number of additional employees required and school district as a result of the new developmenuired per service
Total Housing Units: The cumulative total of new housing units added each year by
project development.
Total Population: The total population added each year by a project derived by
multiplying the number of homes to be constructed by the number of persons per
household (see Section 1) .
School Population: The total number of school children added each
year
derived by multiplying the number of homes constructed by the number ofbchildreneper
household (see Section 1) .
Additional County Employees: The number of additional employees required per service
category based on project development.
Total: Total of all additional county employees required based on project development.
School District Additional Employees: The number of additional employees required per
school district based on the project development.
SECTION 4 - PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON COUNTY
Tax Base: The tax base represents the increase in assessed property value expected each
year resulting from project development. The values shown are in $1,000's and are
derived from a formula which includes the number and sales price of homes, and the
assessment ratio. Where applicable, the percentage of non-elderly units and elderly
exemption are also used.
Revenues: All revenues are derived from a formula which multiplies the per capita
revenues (Section 2) times the projected population (Section 3) . The exception to this
is the property tax which multiplies the tax base times the county government tax rate.
Expenditures: All expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies the per
employee expenditure (Section 2) times the number of additional employees (Section 3) .
Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures and
projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs Orange County more
to provide services to a project than it receives in revenues. A
indicates that more revenues are received than it costs to serve aosroiec net Positive
e
net balances in one project may thus be used to offset negative balances in another.
i
SECTION 5 - PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Revenues: The County contribution is transferring by
County government (Section 4) Revenues
derived by multiplying the school district tax times the tax base. State revenues are
derived by multiplying the per student expenditure figure times the total projected
number of school children (Section 3) .
Expenditures: Expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies each per student
expenditure (Section 2) times the total projected number of school children (Section 3)
and adding the results.
Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance vnet diffrence
betwen
costscthe achool1systemand
projected revenues. A negative
more to provide educational services for children in a project than it receives in
revenues. A positive net balance indicates that more revenues are received than it
costs to serve a project. Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to
offset negative balances in another.
SECTION 6 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED IMPACTS
18
FISCAL IMPACT TEMPLATE: SERVICE STANDARD METHOD
Bureau of Economic & Business Research - Univ of Fla
Modified 10/5/92 - Orange County, NC Planning Department
SECTION 1 - PROJECT DATA
ENTER THE FOLLOWING DATA FOR EACH PROJECT:
PROJECT: Pleasant Green Woods Subdivision
TOWNSHIP: Eno
CONSTRUCTION PERIOD:
Beginning Year: 1994
Ending Year: 1996
Inflation Rate: 2.90%
CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSEHOLDS:
Persons/House: 2.57
Children/House: 0.44
% Non-Elderly: 0.00%
HOME SALES DATA: Average Distribution
Number of Sales of Units
Year Homes Price
by Year
1994 34 190000 33.3$
1995
1996 34 190000 33.3%
1997 34 190000 33.3%
1998 0 0 0.0%
1999 0 0 0.0%
19
1999 0 0 0.0%
2000 0 0 0.0%
2002 0 0 0.0%
2003 0 0 0.0%
0 0.0%
SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: Enter "1" in
project is located btol generate ldistribution of
ich
students by school type.
School District: School Attendance:
Orange County ( 1
Chapel Co - ) Elementary School 49.53%
Carrboro 0 Middle School 23.49%
High School 26.98%
School Age Children/Household: Enter number of units by housing type to
generate school age children/household.
Housing Type School Age Children
Ssneype Units Children Per Household
lex 102 40 0.440
Duplex/Tri
P /Quadplex 0 0
Apartment/Condominium 0 0.000
0 0.000
Town House
Totals 0 0 0.000
102 45 0.440
p4 (7 3//is' I.,q3
19
SECTION 2 - LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA f'
BUDGET YEAR: 1992-93
COUNTY POPULATION: 98648
SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT POPULATION: 5204
COUNTY EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER CAPITA
107.50 0.0011
General Government 124.00 0.0011
Public Safety 24.00 0.0013
Public Works 228.90 0.0004
Human Services 746.00 0.0023
Education (School District)
SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER STUDENT 746.00 0.143
TOTAL
COUNTY PER CAPITA REVENUES ($) : REVENUES PER CAPITA
36.91
Taxes - Other Than Property 3641000 78.65
Intergovernmental 2114697 21.44
Service Charges 2114697 21.41
Miscellaneous
COUNTY PER CAPITA EXPENDITURES ($) : EXPENDITURES PER CAPITA
59.59
General Government 5878463 3 54.59 46
Public Safety 5342356 54.46
Public Works 13824259 140.14
Human Services 750000 7.60
Education (Recurring Capital) 2438243 24.60
Non-Departmental
PER
COUNTY PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURE ($) : EXPENDITURES EMPLOYEE
5878463 54683.38
General Government W 5372356 43325.45
Public Safety 2548812 59274.70
Public Workks s 13824259 60394.32
Human Services 750000 1005.36
Education (Recurring Capital)
SCHOOL DISTRICT T
PER ST
RES UDEN
PER STUDENT EXPENDITURES ($) : EXPENDITURES
1S
UDEN.00
County Government 0.00
School District 0 0.0
16671230 3203.54
State
PER
EXPENDITURES
SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPERYEE
PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURES ($) : 6817240 ITU S 9138.39
County Government 0 0.00
School District 16671230 22340.00
State
TAX DATA:
County Tax Rate ($) 0.7488 Per $100 Assessed Valuation.
School District Tax Rate ($) 0.0000 Per $100 Assessed Valuation.
Assessment Ratio 94.30
Elderly Exemption 0 $11,000 Where applicable.
20
•
SECTION 3 - DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA
YEAR 1994
1995 1996 1997 1998
HOUSING UNITS 34
POPULATION 68 102 102 102
2
87 175 262 262
262
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 7 15
Middle 22 22
4 7 11 22
High School 4 8 12
11
12
TOTAL 15 12 12
30 45 45 45
COUNTY GOVERNMENT
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
General Government 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3
Public Safety 0.1
Public 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3
ublic Works
0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1
Human Services 0.2 0.4 0.1
TOTAL 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6
0.9 1.3 1.3 1.3
SCHOOL DISTRICT
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES 0.7 1.3
2.0 2.0 2.0
YEAR 1999
2000 2001 2002 2003
HOUSING UNITS 102 102
POPULATION 102 2 102
262 262 262 2662
262
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 22 22
Middle 11 22 22 22
11 11 11 11
High School
TOTAL 12 12 12 12 12
45 45 45 45
COUNTY GOVERNMENT
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
General Government 0.3 0.3
Public Safety 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Public Works 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3
0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Human Services 0.6 0.6 0.6
TOTAL 1.3 0.6 0.6 0.6
1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
SCHOOL DISTRICT
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES 2.0 2.0
2.0 2.0 2.0
4y
21
SECTION 4 - PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON COUNTY GOVERNMENT
YEAR
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
TAX BASE ($1000) 6092 12360 18810 19356 19917
REVENUES ($)
Property Tax 45615 92553 140853 144937 149141
Other Taxes 3225 6637 10245 10542 10847
Intergovernmental 6872 14143 21830 22463 23114
Service Charges 1873 3855 5950 6123 6300
Miscellaneous 918 1890 2917 3002 3089
TOTAL ($) 58504 119079 181794 187066 192491
EXPENDITURES ($)
General Government 5207 10716 16540 17020 17513
06
Public Safety 4759 9793 15116 15554 16006
Public Works 2258 4646 7172 7380
Human Services 12245 25201 38897 40025 41186
Education
20262 41699 64362 66229 68150 Non-Departmental 2160 4445 6860 7059 7264
TOTAL ($) 46890 96500 148948 153267 157712
NET FISCAL IMPACT 11614 22578 32846 33799 34779
YEAR 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
TAX BASE ($1000) 20495 21089 21701 22330 22978
REVENUES ($)
Property Tax 153466 157916 162496 167208 172057
Other Taxes 11162 11486 11819 12162 12514
Intergovernmental 23785 24475 25184 25915 26666
Service Charges 6483 6671 6864 7063 7268
Miscellaneous 3178 3270 3365 3463 3563
TOTAL ($) 198074 203818 209728 215811 222069
EXPENDITURES ($)
General Government 18021 18544 19082 19635 20204
Public Safety 16470 16947 17439 17945 18465
Public Works 7814 8040 8274 47514
Human Services 42380 43609 44874 46175
1
Education 70126 72160 74252 76406 78621
Non-Departmental 7475 7692 7915 8144
TOTAL ($) 162286 166992 171835 176818 181946
NET FISCAL IMPACT 35788 36826 37894 38992 40123
22
=
SECTION 5 - PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT
YEAR 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
REVENUES ($)
County 20262 41699 64362 66229 68150
School District 0 0 0 0 0
State 47925 98630 152235 156650 161192
TOTAL ($) 68187 140329 216597 222879 229342
EXPENDITURES ($)
County 20262 41699 64362 66229 68150
School District 0 0 0 0 0
State 47925 98630 152235 156650 161192
TOTAL ($) 68187 140329 216597 222879 229342
NET FISCAL IMPACT 0 0 0 0 0
YEAR 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
REVENUES ($)
County 70126 72160 74252 76406 78621
School District 0 0 0 0 0
State 165867 170677 175627 180720 185961
TOTAL ($) 235993 242837 249879 257126 264582
EXPENDITURES ($)
County 70126 72160 74252 76406 78621
School District 0 0 0 0 0
State 165867 170677 175627 180720 185961
TOTAL ($) 235993 242837 249879 257126 264582
NET FISCAL IMPACT 0 0 0 0 0
I
23
t
SECTION 6 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED DEMOGRAPHIC/FISCAL IMPACTS
YEAR 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
HOUSING UNITS 34 68 102 102 102
POPULATION 87 175 262 262 262
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 7 15 22 22 22
12 2 11
Middle 4 7 11
8 12 12 12
4
High School
TOTAL 15 30 45 45 45
COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0.45 0.89 1.34 1.34 1.34
SCHOOL DISTRICT 1.98 1.98
EMPLOYEES 0.66 1.32 1.98
TAX BASE ($1000) 6092 12360 18810 19356 19917
COUNTY OPERATING
BUDGET ($)
Revenues 58504 119079 181794 187066 192491
Expenditures 46890 96500 148948 153267 157712
BALANCE 11614 22578 32846 33799 34779
SCHOOL DISTRICT
OPERATING BUDGET ($)
Revenues 68187 140329 216597 222879 229342
Expenditures 68187 140329 216597 222879 229342
BALANCE 0 0 0 0
YEAR 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
HOUSING UNITS 102 102 102 102 102
POPULATION 262 262 262 262 262
SCHOOL CHILDREN 2
22 22 2 2 2 2
Elementary 22 22 22 22 22
Middle 11
High School 12
12 12 12 12
45 45 45
TOTAL 45 45
COUNTY EMPLOYEES 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.34
SCHOOL DISTRICT
EMPLOYEES 1.98 1.98 1.98 1.98 1.98
TAX BASE ($1000) 20495 21089 21701 22330 22978
COUNTY OPERATING
BUDGET ($)
Revenues 198074 203818 209728 215811 222069
Expenditures 162286 166992 171835 176818 181946
BALANCE 35788 36826 37894 38992 40123
SCHOOL DISTRICT
OPERATING BUDGET ($)
Revenues 235993 242837 249879 257126 264582
Expenditures 235993 242837 249879 257126 264582
BALANCE 0 0 0
D IF 1r
24
e. Planning Board/Economic Development Work Group
To be presented with Agenda Item #9 - Matters
Scheduled for Public Hearing February 22, 1993.
f. Historic Preservation Commission
No meeting.
g. Transportation Advisory Subcommittee
Hamilton and Hoecke not available for meeting.
h. Solid Waste Committee
Reid not available for meeting, but, reminded Board
members that announcements had been made of meetings
scheduled with the Township Advisory Councils.
AGENDA ITEM #8: SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS
a. Preliminary Plans
( 1) Pleasant Green Woods
(20 Lots - Eno Township)
Presentation by Mary Willis.
The property is located on the east side of
Pleasant Green Road between Willett Road and Cole
Mill Road. The property is known as Lots 3A and 4
of Tax Map. 24, Eno Township.
The tract contains 32. 7 acres. There are 19
residential lots proposed, ranging from 1. 01 to
2 .43 acres and averaging 1 . 37 acres in size. The
property is zoned Rural Residential and is
designated as Rural Residential in the Land Use
Element of the Comprehensive Plan. It is not
located within any watershed or other zoning
overlay district.
The lots proposed in this Preliminary Plan
represent only the first phase of Pleasant Green
Woods. The total tract contains 155 acres and
102 lots. A second Preliminary Plat will be
submitted within several months, and will include
the remaining four phases of the development.
The Concept Plan for the entire tract was
approved by the Planning Board on November 16,
1992 .
Watersupply and wastewater disposal will be
provided by individual wells and septic tanks.
Ir.
'3,,q P/3
L:\ Y
25
The Orange County Division of Environmental
Health initially indicated that soil suitable for
a septic system and repair area was not found on
Lot 11. The applicant and surveyor have since
informed Staff that suitable soils have been
located in the vicinity of the boundary between
lots 11 and 12 . The lot line can be adjusted
accordingly to allow development of lot 11.
The remaining lots were found to be provisionally
suitable for development.
The Orange County Fire Marshall commented that a
turn around area for emergency vehicles was
needed at the end of Jomali Road. A T-turnaround
will be constructed in a manner which allows for
future road extension.
The County Engineer indicated that portions of
several lots contain fairly steep slopes and that
drainage easements may be needed in some areas.
The Erosion indicated that
and
approval grading
appp roval l of f
permit would be required prior to any
disturbance.
The Planning Staff recommends approval of the
proposed Preliminary Plan for Pleasant Green
Woods with conditions as contained in the
Resolution of Approval. (A copy of the
Resolution is an attachment to these minutes on
pages • )
Willis recommended that condition A3 in the
Resolution of Approval be changed to indicate
that a Notice of Restricted Development potential
would not be required for lot 11 if suitable
soils are verified.
Hamilton asked about the fiscal impact analysis
that was distributed prior to the meeting for
this subdivision. Collins responded that the
Board of Commissioners have asked that Staff
provide this information for all subdivisions
of ten or more lots at the preliminary plan
stage.
Gray asked about suitable soils on lots 11 and
12 . Willis responded that the boundary between
the two lots may be revised but that both lots
would still meet minimum standards.
Eidenier asked if thecnextml analysis
ong range
could b be ex meeting
cop
E-
LI
I !,
and L u 26
Collins agreed.
MOTION: Jobsis moved approval as recommended by the
Planning Staff with the change in the Resolution
of Approval as noted by Willis. Seconded by
Burklin.
VOTE: Unanimous.
AGENDA ITEM #9: MATTERS SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC HEARING (2/22/93)
a. Comprehensive Plan Amendment
( 1) CP-1-93 Economic Development Districts
b. Zoning Atlas Amendment
( 1) Z-1-93 Economic Development Districts
c. Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment
( 1) Economic Development Districts
d. Subdivision Regulations Text Amendment
( 1 ) Private Road Justification Criteria
This item is to consider proposed amendments, to the
Zoning Atlas, Zoning Ordinance, and Land Use Element
of the Comprehensive Plan to create and implement an
Economic Development Zoning District; and proposed
amendments to the Subdivision Regulations to expand
private road justification criteria.
Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and Land Use
Element of the Comprehensive Plan to create and
apply an Economic Development Zoning District and
development guidelines will be presented for public
hearing on February 22 . A draft of the proposal was
presented to the Planning Board at its meeting on
January 25, 1993. The Planning Director proposed a
number of changes to the draft amendments in a
January 31, 1993 memorandum to the Board of
Commissioners, which was copied to the Planning
Board.
On February 9 and 11, public information meetings
were held in each of the four target areas. Staff
is currently compiling comments from these meetings.
Public comments and any proposed changes to the
items which will be presented at the public hearing
will be discussed at the Planning Board meeting.
AGENDA ITEM #10: PLANNING BOARD ITEMS
a. Reconsideration of Rural Character Strategies