Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 02-16-1993 - III-E 1 O R A N G E C O U N T Y BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: February 16, 1993 Action Agenda Item # )7L-E SUBJECT: MINCEY FARM - PRELIMINARY PLAN ACTION BY: April 2, 1993 DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING: Yes X No ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Cameron Resolution of Approval Extension 2580 Application Vicinity Map Preliminary Plan Fiscal Impact Analysis TELEPHONE NUMBERS: 1/25/93 Draft Planning Hillsborough - 732-8181 Board Minutes Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 967-9251/968-4501 PURPOSE: Consideration of the Preliminary Plan for Mincey Farm Subdivision. BACKGROUND: The property is located in Cedar Grove and Little River Townships on the west side of NC Highway 57 between Mincey Road (SR 1552) and Latta Road (SR 1550 ) . It is designated as Agricultural Residential in the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Adjacent land uses are agricultural and residential. In 1991, the traffic count for NC Highway 57 was 2500 trips per day. A minor subdivision for Mincey Farm was recently approved to create five (5) lots on new private roads . The major subdivision application is to divide two of the larger lots containing 17 . 63 acres into fifteen ( 15) new lots and upgrade the private roads to public. The average lot size is 1. 18 acres. All lots will be served by individual wells and septic tanks. NCDOT has recommended some minor clearing and grading to improve sight distance at the subdivision entrance on NC Highway 57 . The drainage easement that crosses lots E3 through E6 must be extended across lot A5. Its purpose is to accommodate the outflow from a pond on adjacent property. The drainage way is actually a wide grassed 2 swale and will not significantly restrict development of the affected lots. The minor subdivision at Mincey Farm was approved with a private road. The Subdivision Regulations _ _ require that no further subdivision be allowed as part of the justification for a private road. Therefore, the owners of the minor subdivision lots will be required to sign a statement included in the Declaration for the major that will demonstrate their consent to the division of Mincey Farm. The Planning Board recommended approval of the Preliminary Plan for Mincey Farm on January 25, 1993 . RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan for Mincey Farm Subdivision with public roads built to State standards and the conditions contained in the Resolution of Approval. • ,044 , RESOLUTION OF THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Date February 16 1993 Name of Subdivision Mince v Farm - Section Two Owners/Applicants Roper D. Ste.hens and Bonnie M. Gates The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves Mincey Farm - Section Two subdivision preliminary plat, dated December 21, 1992 and containing 15 lots, subject to the fulfillment of requirements specified herein. All roads shall be irrevocably dedicated to the general public and be constructed to standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. The approval of this resolution authorizes and directs the Orange County Manager to accept for Orange County and on behalf of the public generally, the offer of dedication of Planters Trail and Lindsey Woods Road. This acceptance by Orange County of the dedication to the general public of Planters Trail and Lindsey Woods Road shall be without maintenance responsibility. These roads shall be maintained by the owner/applicant until such time as they are accepted f or maintenance by the North Carolina Department of Transportation or some other governmental body. Before the Final Plat of Mincey Farm - Section Two can be recorded: A. Sewage Disposal 1. Each residential lot shall contain an adequate area for septic disposal, and repair area, approved by the Orange County Division of Environmental Health. 2. Disclosure that the septic system location may restrict the size and location of improvements. This disclosure shall be included in a document describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. The document shall also disclose that information regarding the tentative location of septic systems is available from the Orange County Health Department, Division of Environmental Health. B. Roads and Access 1. Planters Trail and Lindsey Woods Road shall be constructed to standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation, within 50 foot rights-of-way, and the construction shall be inspected and approved b NCDOT. by 2 OR A letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond shall be submitted to secure construction of Planters Trail and Lindsey Woods Road to the standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. An estimate of the construction cost must be prepared by a certified/licensed engineer or grading contractor and submitted to the Planning and Inspections Department. The financial guarantee must reflect 110% of that estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina. The document describing development restrictions to be recorded with the Final Plat shall state that the financial guarantee will not be released until the road construction has been inspected and approved by NCDOT. 2. Lots Al and El0 shall access onto Planters Trail. All lots shall access onto the new subdivision roads. This restriction shall be stated in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 3. Approved street name signs shall be erected at the intersection of streets as required in Section IV-B-3-c-12 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. Evidence shall be submitted by the applicant that the signs are in place or a copy of the receipt for purchase of the signs shall be submitted to the Planning Department. 4. Minor grading and clearing at the subdivision entrance shall be accomplished to improve sight distance subject to approval by the N.C. Department of Transportation. C. Land Use Buffers and Landscaping 1. Landscaping shall be installed or preserved as indicated on the approved landscape plan, and must be inspected and approved by the Planning and Inspections Department. OR The applicant shall secure landscape requirement installation and preservation through a letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond. An estimate of the cost for required preservation, plantings and their installation must be provided. The financial guarantee shall reflect 110% of the estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina. 2. Provisions for protection of existing trees as shown on the approved landscape plan shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 3 3. A Type E Land Use Buffer shall be provided along N.C. Highway 57. The buffer shall be 75 feet in width and provide sufficient vegetation to meet the standards of Section IV-B-8-e of the Subdivision Regulations. Said buffer shall be so noted on the plat, and described in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. D. Drainage 1. Indicate a 30-foot drainage easement along the swale crossing lots A5 and E3 through E6. E. Parkland 1. Cash in the amount of $1,292.00 ($3,480/acre x 13/35 acre) shall be paid to Orange County as payment in lieu of parkland dedication. F. Miscellaneous 1. The Final Plat shall contain a title block and vicinity map in accordance with Section V-D-2 and V-D-3 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. 2. The Declaration of Restrictions shall include a statement whereby the owners of the five lots created in Mincey Farm - Section One shall consent to the further subdivision of said lots. The Declaration shall be signed by the owners of the Section One lots. 3. The following easement shall be shown on the plat: a. 30-foot drainage easement on lots A5, E3 through E6. G. Certifications 1. A Certificate of Survey and Accuracy signed by a registered Land Surveyor shall be notarized on the face of the Final Plat. 2. A Certificate of Declaration and Maintenance in the form provided in Section V-D-6-b of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations signed by the landowner and developer shall be on the face of the plat and included in a document describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 3. The Department of Environmental Health shall certify that each lot contains a suitable area for septic disposal. 4 4. The North Carolina Department of Transportation shall certify that Planters Trail and Lindsey Woods Road have been constructed to State standards or that construction plans have been approved. 5. A Certificate of Approval signed by the Orange County Planning and Inspections Department. Cle- ,44,u. 444----- ccy\' U_(9...9k_ 44 Signature of ApplicAt Clerk(u the Board , accept the above listed conditions of subdivision approval, and acknowledge that eaci'must be met prior to recordation of the final plat. APPLICATIONFOR F . ; ELIMINARY PLAN AE ,� ROVAL 7 MAJOR SUBDIVISION 2/90 . • ORANGE COUNTY �1r �, H 4'•50 • DATE: 1.-,1-q., PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT (INK ONLY) SUBDIVISION NAME: t71 I1•.\0.,,C_y i`rel 1 LOCATION: \-\N■) `r N, 1.4 \L1_�,e Q 4.0 l.)(_,t1 , W- ,l"... 7-1:27F OWNER/DEVELOPER: R,dl;,l-T:. D, ::re.,e 0.k;: .., 1.- t.G)∎'v I t 1•.A , C4 a TtLS ADDRESS: P.O, ov 39'1') TELEPHONE NO.: t9-1 3, -. °,4l1r 41LL.S6OQo QUA. 1J , alai?, AGENT/CONTACT: ff TELEPHONE NO.: fl A. SUMMARY INFORMATION: Orange County Tax Map ZS Block - Lot(s) 15 Township 1 iTTLE RIVE Zoning District(s): t\101C Total Number of Acres: I $ , ., ') 4C-- Phases: 'Or.IE Total Number of Lots: IS Average Lot Size: 1.0.Z.1 Minimum Lot Size: . )Z. Number/Type of Structures: (existing) ►aoNC (proposed) SI46L.ir p'Am\∎-y R■!5..tDe,AT•1L_. Lineal Feet in Streets: 11911 Acres in Open Space: 1(o, 1 9 Water Supply: VIZ.LL.. Public (specify) Community ✓ Individual Wastewater Disposal: S erric. Public (specify) Community ✓ Individual School District: LOII Lin, - C.egTee'\s__ Fire District: 4 1 l.•_S e.9 P-0 1141.4 General Land Uses in Area: r 46`\CL1\..Ta1Rt\... - R, .,..\0 vi.Nrr 1II:L.. Critical Areas: I-14 stream/drainageways 141 A flood prone areas WI A watershed (specify) --N I A historic sites other (expl'ain) 1`1)4 Is the property to be subdivided currently under "farm use value taxation"? Yes No 1./". If "yes", please contact the Orange County Tax Office. Subdivision of the property may require payment of deferred taxes under "farm use value taxation". B. All plats must be submitted on sheet no smaller than one inch equals two-hundred feet (1"=200') and no larger a than one inch equals twenty feet (1"=20') and must contain the following information: �_: subdivision name I� zoning of tract and adjacent properties QJ ✓ ? name & address of owner(s) V VA building setback lines by notation or typical lot z h,l ?: name & address of subdivider / .(;.:M` layout ""}' (if other than owner) ✓ '1.•0• location and width of existing and proposed w `;'. p name of surveyor, engineer, / easements (drainage, utilities, roads, etc.) oi landscape architect or architect, ./ j existing, proposed and adjoining rights-of-way �, :'. 'i address, registration A and seal including dimensions and street names and state O (title) Preliminary> Plan En road numbers. Lineal feet of road centerlines and ,c _✓ •:''': : scale, north arrrow z`;`` approximate acreage of new street rights-of-way _✓ '.: :i date (including revision dates) FA '!^ existing and proposed utilities, including type, `t •../' :`• i township, tax map-block-lot sizes, hydrants, valves, manholes T3 ` ' •• references 4 :) existing and proposed curbs, gutters and culverts, t�`' i`•:.....: Parent Parcel Identification k M including sizes and grades 7 deed book and page k of property •: location and width of alleys, sidewalks, bike lanes, to be subdivided • ' transit systems, and bus stops (please complete reverse side) :' :i:' boundary described with cearings V / •.... ::: and distances < typical street cross' sections and intersection 8 -sL/ total acreage of the tract and details including design and width of travelway and x::: shoulders gird C : acreage of lots, including and O _ acreage area horizontal alignment and D within rights-of-way general curve data (public a Pf.O .>' control corner / roads) j ✓ ` '.;_'- centerline radius on all proposed proposed lot tines with dimensions P posed streets 0 `:i; `ji lot S block numbers - - .44 permanent features such as buildings cemeteries, v U '" "" phasing lines :'' historic landmarks rye V '`_-„ 'sMi adjoining tot layout names of adjoining property � � topography” at ten foot (10) intervals ���� P Y .0 1.. bodies, streams, floodua a� owners. If subdivided, subdivision plat name, plat .Y� "'�V-•%;j water ;;';;: ? water loins y / i.?. `` book & page number, and V !' ✓ ;i ; .;: perimeter lot numbers. U %`if:=:< stream buffers landscaping and buffer requirements C, v `` ''':? location and size of ✓ "`. `'`=`' township, corporate and extra-territorial parcels dedicated >.'•+> property planning ro i::: for public use recreational use or tiJ� ';, ; : jurisdiction lines which cross the property U 'b :;:;?'`? reserved in common, 1-� ; ;; location and size of lots of restricted development k aJ ail, ;:.•:::..;•.; with purpose noted Jam{' ,w ;�:?::: U '-e `;..,ttif..: impervious surface data (if located in k^^:?:'; potential and notation on plat regarding same v ro water supply watershed) stormwater detention and/or retention sites and :. vicinity map showing "` undisturbed areas for infiltration purposes (if g general location located in water supply watershed) ' of subdivision with streets and roads identified by State road number and name C. OTHER SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Twenty-five (25) copies of the preliminary plat. 2. One full size copy of an Orange County Tax map (with tax parcels involved clearly marked in pencil). 3. Where municipal or OWASA sewer is not available, a copy of the Preliminary Plat indicating Health Department soils analysis approval/denial for each lot shown thereon. 4. Where a private road is proposed a written statement by the applicant or his/her authorized representative which sets forth the justification for a private road (see Section IV-B-3-d-1 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations). 5. Auxiliary documents, in draft form, prepared in accordance with Section VI of this Ordinance which assure completion and/or maintenance of improvements required by this Ordinance. Such documents may include, but , not be limited to, a private road maintenance agreement, and articles of incorporation and restrictive covenants pertaining to a homeowner's association. These documents may be required as necessary as evidence that the ordinance requirements are being met. 6. Fee - S350.00 plus $5.00 per lot (1 fee for preliminary and final plat). 1, the applicant, hereby certify that the foregoing application is complete and accurate. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S SIGNATURE `/ la- aI- 9 DATE l - i_, DATE FEES: Amount A 5 , f}0 pp Date Paid '�.� ./:), Receipt # 4._÷.._...f5_ , ^ � :'3A* - ,,,,, .....s , ///1/7H' P/13 20 AG. LITTLE R IVE 0 ■ 1 r f I .1990 C779504 - PAir ' - 6.9 1..tAJAC'/// -s--^-:- .5311 41" ////1 .. /./-1.1AC. ti"-5tC- 0 0193._...,.-,,....ez-.17:24.4..07: - 011; , .. , 0 .-L-.„.„ , ,,,, A- 451 0 %Pr CU 77.. / / _ i ."' — ./ II 0 4.054C — ..f R/L DR iii,--1 „ _.,;_,...i... ____ _ 0 3 I8N/ "=°" ~", //� `��.~~" -'"ii-- ^`�` �. / R66 ^ � / '~ / `",° ` " ' .' 10 FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR MINCEY FARM SUBDIVISION SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH Prepared by The Orange County Planning Departaent February, 1993 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Mincey Farm is a proposed 15-lot major subdivision located on the west side of N.C. Highway 57 between Mincey Road (SR 1552) and Latta Road (SR 1550) . The average lot size is 1.18 acres. All lots will be served by individual wells and septic tanks, and public roads. For Mincey Farm, project build-out is estimated at three years. Housing units will be constructed, beginning in 1994, with completion of the project scheduled for 1996. Units will consist of detached single-family homes, and the applicant estimates the average sales price to be $92,000, including the lot ($18,000) . METHODOLOGY Fiscal impact analysis is a projection of the direct, current, public costs and revenues associated with residential and non residential growth in the jurisdiction in which the growth is taking place. Fiscal impact analysis considers only direct impact in that it projects only the primary costs that will be incurred and the immediate revenues that will be generated. It calculates the financial effect of a planned development or new subdivision by considering the current costs and revenues such a development would generate if it were completed and occupied today. Fiscal impact analysis does not consider the private costs of public action. It is concerned only with public (governmental) costs and revenues. The method used in preparing the fiscal impact analysis of Mincey Farms is the Service Standard Approach. While only gross expenditures by service category are derived from the Per Capita Method, the Service Standard method determines the total number of additional employees by service function that will be required as a result of growth. This method employs average county government costs per person, average school costs per pupil, an employee to population ratio, and average operating expenses per employee for each service category and school district. The number of new employees are projected and multiplied times the average operating expenses (includes personnel, operating and capital costs) per employee. These average costs are then weighed against per capita and per pupil revenues to project the total net fiscal impact of the development. TABLE OF CONTENTS SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH PROJECT FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Section 1 - Project Data Project Name, Township, School District Beginning Year, Ending Year, Inflation Characteristics of Households Construction Schedule/Cost Data Section 2 - Local Government and School District Data Budget Year Per Capita Revenues Per Capita Expenditures Per Student Expenditures School District Per Employee Expenditures Employees Per 1000 Population County Per Employee Expenditure Other Data Other Model Constants School District Data Section 3 - Demographic Projections Based On Project Data Total Housing Total Population School Children Additional County Employees Total School District Additional Employees Section 4 - Projected Net Fiscal Impact on County Tax Base Revenues Expenditures Net Fiscal Impact Section 5 - Projected Net Fiscal Impact on School District Revenues Expenditures Net Fiscal Impact Section 6 - Summary of Projected Impacts Additional Housing Additional Population Additional School Children • Tax Base County Government Balance School District Balance Total Net Fiscal Impact EXPLANATION OF TERNS AND DATA SOURCES • • 12 EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND DATA SOURCES SECTION 1 - PROJECT DATA Project data includes information about the specific development project. all, of the information is supplied by the applicant. Data inputs include: if not Project Name: Name of the project. Township: Township in which the project is located. School District: School district in which the project is located. Beginning Year: The first year of the project in which dwelling units are completed and occupied. Ending Year: The last year in which dwelling units are completed and occupied. The template is set to calculate fiscal impacts for a ten-year period. Inflation Rate: Unless an inflation rate is entered, the template will calculate fiscal impacts based on constant dollars. Since the inflation rate changes from month to month, the Finance Department must be contacted for the most recent figure. Persons/Household: The estimated average number of persons/household (dwelling unit) . If this information is not supplied by the applicant, a figure will be supplied by the Orange County Planning Department based on 1990 Census data for the township in which the project is located. Children/Household: The estimated average number of school age children/household (dwelling unit) . If this information is not supplied by the applicant, a figure will be supplied by the Orange County Planning Department based on 1990 Census data for the township in which the project is located. % Non-Elderly: N.C. General Statutes permit an $11,000 exemption to the elderly and disabled who meet certain income criteria. In the event that elderly units are part of the project, the percentage of eligible non-elderly units is entered. The tax base will automatically be adjusted to reflect the exemption. Number of Homes: The number of dwelling units to be constructed in the project in each year. Average Sales Price: The average sales price of all dwelling units based on the number and sales price of dwelling unit types to be constructed in each year. PfrF '04/93 13 SECTION 2 - LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA Local government data includes information regarding expenditures required to provide County services and revenues received based on the approved Orange County budget for the fiscal year in which the project is considered for approval. All information derived from the approved budget remains constant throughout a fiscal year (July-June) and is changed- only with the approval of a new budget. Local government revenue and expenditure information is compiled on a per capita (per person) basis. Per capita figures are derived by dividing the total expenditures for a particular service function or revenue source by the estimated population of Orange County for the year in which the project is considered for approval. Populations estimates are prepared by the Planning Department. Data inputs include the following: Budget Year: The current fiscal year; i.e. , 1992-93. Per Capita Revenues: The sources of revenue by major category are as follows: Taxes - Other Than Property: Revenues from taxes other than property taxes include those from sales and use taxes, franchise taxes, and animal taxes. Intergovernmental Aid: Revenues from this source, in the form of categorical aid or shared-tax revenues, are provided through State and federal assistance programs. Service Charges: Service (or user) charges support numerous functions and are charged to those who voluntarily receive governmental services or use governmental facilities. Miscellaneous: Miscellaneous revenues include interest earnings on investments, proceeds from license and permit fees, and all other revenues. Per Capita Expenditures: Expenditures by major category are as follows: General Government: Services related to the legislative, administrative, financial, and legal functions of government. Public Safety: Law enforcement services and emergency medical services. Public Works: Efforts related to the maintenance of County-owned property and the provision of sanitation (solid waste disposal) services. Human Services: Departments responsible for the provision of health, social, and recreation-related services. Education: Orange County supports two school units, the Orange County school system and the Chapel Hill\Carrboro school system. This category includes appropriations made to the designated school system for Recurring Capital items. Recurring Capital funds are used for general maintenance, purchase of new equipment/furnishings and vehicle maintenance. Non-Departmental: Contributions to agencies providing cultural and social services outside the formal structure of county government. Other expenditures include equipment replacement and contingency funds. Although there are no employees generated by this category, it has been included as an operating expenditure. It will be included in Section 4, "Total Annual County Expenditure. " These expenditures will be calculated on a per capita basis as opposed to a per employee basis. Per Student Expenditures: Information regarding expenditures required to provide educational services and revenues received are based on the approved school system budgets for the fiscal year in which the project is considered for approval. All information derived from the approved budgets remains constant throughout a fiscal year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of new budgets. 14 Expenditure information is compiled on a per student basis for County Government Current Expense, School District and State appropriations. County Government Current Expense funds are used for general operation purposes including Instruction and Support Services. Federal revenues -and expenditures and other local revenues such as Fund Balance have not been included since they are not directly growth related. Per student figures are derived by dividing the total appropriation for educational purposes from a particular source by the estimated number of students to be enrolled in the applicable school system for the year in which the project is considered for approval. Student enrollments are obtained from the approved school system budgets. County Government: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations to the school systems by Orange County for Current Expense. The minimum level of per student appropriation is determined by the State Board of Education. School District: Expenditures in this category are unique to the Chapel Hill-Carrboro school system and are based on the level of expenditures possible through assessment of a supplementary school tax. State: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations from the State Board of Education. School District Per Employee Expenditure: Expenditures per employee based on County, School District and State appropriations, and the total number of school district employees. Employees Per 1000 Population: The number of employees in a particular service category per 1000 population. County Per Employee Expenditure: The average operating and capital expenses per employee in a particular service category. Total expenses in each category includes personnel, operating and capital costs. Other Data: County Government Tax Rate: The County tax rate per $100 of assessed valuation. Since the per capita method focuses only on operating expenditures, the tax rate is reduced by an amount equal to the debt service payments for capital projects. School District Tax Rate: The supplementary tax assessed on behalf of the Chapel Hill- Carrboro school system. Assessment Ratio: The ratio of market (sales) value to assessed value based on information supplied by the Tax Office. The assessment ratio is used to convert market value to assessed value for the purpose of computing the tax base. Other Model Constants Elderly Exemption: For projects developed partially or exclusively for elderly (65 and older) or disabled individuals whose annual income does not exceed $12,000, an $11,000 tax exemption is used in projecting the tax base. School District Data: Employees Per Student: The number of employees per student in a specific school district. I5 SECTION 3 - DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA Demographic projections provide information about the number of new residents and school children anticipated in Orange County resulting from project development. Projections also provide the number of additional employees required per service function and school district as a result of the new development. Total Housing Units: The cumulative total of new housing units added each year by project development. Total Population: The total population added each year by a project derived by multiplying the number of homes to be constructed by the number of persons per household (see Section 1) . School Population: The total number of school children added each year by a project derived by multiplying the number of homes constructed by the number of children per household (see Section 1) . Additional County Employees: The number of additional employees required per service category based on project development. Total: Total of all additional county employees required based on project development. School District Additional Employees: The number of additional employees required per school district based on the project development. SECTION 4 - PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON COUNTY Tax Base: The tax base represents the increase in assessed property value expected each year resulting from project development. The values shown are in $1,000's and are derived from a formula which includes the number and sales price of homes, and the assessment ratio. Where applicable, the percentage of non-elderly units and elderly exemption are also used. Revenues: All revenues are derived from a formula which multiplies the per capita revenues (Section 2) times the projected population (Section 3) . The exception to this is the property tax which multiplies the tax base times the county government tax rate. Expenditures: All expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies the per employee expenditure (Section 2) times the number of additional employees (Section 3) . Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures and projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs Orange County more to provide services to a project than it receives in revenues. A positive net balance indicates that more revenues are received than it costs to serve a project. Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset negative balances in another. 16 SECTION 5 - PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT Revenues: The County contribution is derived by transferring education expenditures by County government (Section 4) . Revenues derived from the school district tax are derived by multiplying the school district tax times the tax base. State revenues are derived by multiplying the per student expenditure figure times the total projected number of school children (Section 3) . Expenditures: Expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies each per student expenditure (Section 2) times the total projected number of school children (Section 3) and adding the results. Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures and projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs the school system more to provide educational services for children in a project than it receives in revenues. A positive net balance indicates that more revenues are received than it costs to serve a project. Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset negative balances in another. SECTION 6 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED IMPACTS 1/4 1 17 FISCAL IMPACT TEMPLATE: SERVICE STANDARD METHOD Bureau of Economic & Business Research - Univ of Fla Modified 10/5/92 - Orange County, NC Planning Department SECTION 1 - PROJECT DATA ENTER THE FOLLOWING DATA FOR EACH PROJECT: PROJECT: Mincey Farms Subdivision TOWNSHIP: Cedar Grove/Little River CONSTRUCTION PERIOD: Beginning Year: 1994 Ending Year: 1996 Inflation Rate: 2.90% CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSEHOLDS: Persons/House: 2.73 Children/House: 0.46 % Non-Elderly: 0.00% HOME SALES DATA: Average Distribution Number of Sales of Units Year Homes Price by Year 1994 5 92000 33.3% 1995 5 92000 33.3% 1996 5 92000 33.3% 1997 0 0 0.0% 1998 0 0 0.0% 1999 0 0 0.0% 2000 0 0 0.0% 2001 0 0 0.0% 2002 0 0 0.0% 2003 0 0 0.0% SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: Enter "1" in ( ) beside school district in which project is located to generate distribution of students by school type. School District: School Attendance: Orange County ( 1 ) Elementary School 49.53% Chapel Hill- ( 0 ) Middle School 23.49% Carrboro High School 26.98% School Age Children/Household: Enter number of units by housing type to generate school age children/household. School Age Children Housing Type Units Children Per Household Single-Family 15 7 0.460 Duplex/Triplex/Quadplex 0 0 0.000 Apartment/Condominium 0 0 0.000 Town House 0 0 0.000 Totals 15 7 0.460 18 SECTION 2 - LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA =====s= BUDGET YEAR: - - - • 1992-93 COUNTY POPULATION: 98648 SCHOOL-DISTRICT STUDENT POPULATION: 5204 COUNTY EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER CAPITA General Government 107.50 0.0011 Public Safety 124.00 0.0013 Public Works Human Services 43.00 0.0004 Education (School District) 228.90 0.0023 746.00 0.0076 SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER STUDENT TOTAL 746.00 0.143 • COUNTY PER CAPITA REVENUES ($) : REVENUES PER CAPITA Taxes - Other Than Property 3641000 36.91 Intergovernmental 7758493 78.65 Service Charges 2114697 Miscellaneous 21.44 1036728 10.51 COUNTY PER CAPITA EXPENDITURES ($) : EXPENDITURES PER CAPITA General Government 5878463 59.59 Public Safety 5372356 54.46 Public Works 2548812 25.84 Human Services 13824259 140.14 Education (Recurring Capital) 750000 7.60 Non-Departmental 2438243 24.72 COUNTY PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURE PER ($) : EXPENDITURES EMPLOYEE General Government 5878463 54683.38 Public Safety 5372356 43325.45 Public Works 2548812 59274.70 Human Services 13824259 60394.32 Education (Recurring Capital) 750000 1005.36 SCHOOL DISTRICT PER STUDENT EXPENDITURES ($) : EXPENDITURES PER STUDENT ' County Government 6817240 1310.00 School District 0 0.00 State 16671230 3203.54 SCHOOL DISTRICT PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURES PER ($) : EXPENDITURES EMPLOYEE County Government 6817240 9138.39 School District 0 0.00 State 16671230 22347.49 TAX DATA: County Tax Rate ($) 0.7488 Per $100 Assessed Valuation. School District Tax Rate ($) 0.0000 Per $100 Assessed Valuation. Assessment Ratio 95.89 Elderly Exemption 0 $11,000 Where applicable. enr„ern/93 Laic -19 = SECTION 3 - DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS EASED ON PROJECT DATA ======u= YEAR 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 - - HOUSING UNITS 5 10 15 15 15 POPULATION 14 27 41 41 41 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 1 2 3 3 3 Middle 1 1 2 2 2 High School 1 1 2 2 2 TOTAL 2 5 7 7 7 COUNTY GOVERNMENT ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES General Government 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Public Safety 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 Public Works 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Human Services 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 TOTAL 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 SCHOOL DISTRICT ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 YEAR 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 HOUSING UNITS 15 15 15 15 15 POPULATION 41 41 41 41 41 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 3 3 3 3 3 Middle 2 2 2 2 2 High School 2 2 2 2 2 TOTAL 7 7 7 7 7 COUNTY GOVERNMENT ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES ' General Government 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Public Safety 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Public Works 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Human Services 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 TOTAL 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 SCHOOL DISTRICT ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 = • ' 20 SECTION 4 - PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON COUNTY GOVERNMENT YEAR 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 TAX BASE ($1000) 441 895 1362 1402 1442 REVENUES ($) Property Tax 3303 6702 10199 10495 10799 Other Taxes 504 1037 1600 1647 1695 Intergovernmental 1074 2209 3410 3509 3611 Service Charges 293 602 929 956 984 Miscellaneous 143 295 456 469 482 TOTAL ($) 5316 10845 16595 17076 17571 EXPENDITURES ($) General Government 813 1674 2584 2659 2736 Public Safety 743 1530 2361 2430 2500 Public Works 353 726 1120 1153 1186 Human Services 1913 3937 6076 6252 6434 Education 3117 6414 9901 10188 10483 Non-Departmental 337 694 1072 1103 1135 TOTAL ($) 7276 14975 23114 23784 24474 NET FISCAL IMPACT -1960 -4130 -6519 -6708 -6903 = YEAR 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 TAX BASE ($1000) 1484 1527 1571 1617 1664 REVENUES ($) Property Tax 11112 11434 11766 12107 12458 Other Taxes 1744 1794 1846 1900 1955 Intergovernmental 3716 3823 3934 4048 4166 Service Charges 1013 1042 1072 1103 1135 Miscellaneous 496 511 526 541 557 TOTAL ($) 18081 18605 19144 19700 20271 EXPENDITURES ($) General Government 2815 2897 2981 3067 3156 Public Safety 2573 2647 2724 2803 2884 Public Works 1221 1256 1292 1330 1368 Human Services 6620 6812 7010 7213 7422 Education 10787 11100 11422 11753 12094 Non-Departmental 1168 1202 1236 1272 1309 TOTAL ($) 25184 25914 26666 27439 28235 NET FISCAL IMPACT -7103 -7309 -7521 -7739 -7964 ' MT -V/61193 /72:12: -- t ' --- 2 1 == == = SECTION 5 - PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT ===== - - - - - - YEAR 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 .. - REVENUES ($) County 3117 6414 9901 10188 10483 School District 0 0 0 0 0 State 7368 15164 23405 24084 24782 TOTAL ($) 10485 21578 33306 34271 35265 EXPENDITURES ($) County 3117 6414 9901 10188 10483 School District 0 0 0 0 0 State 7368 15164 23405 24084 24782 TOTAL ($) 10485 21578 33306 34271 35265 NET FISCAL IMPACT 0 0 0 0 0 YEAR 1999 • 2000 2001 2002 . 2003 REVENUES ($) County 10787 11100 11422 11753 12094 School District 0 0 0 0 0 State 25501 26240 27001 27784 28590 TOTAL ($) 36288 37340 38423 39538 40684 EXPENDITURES ($) County 10787 11100 11422 11753 12094 School District 0 0 0 0 0 State 25501 26240 27001 27784 28590 TOTAL ($) 36288 37340 38423 39538 40684 NET FISCAL IMPACT 0 0 0 0 0 ' . . 22 SECTION 6 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED DEMOGRAPHIC/FISCAL IMPACTS ==- YEAR _ 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 _ HOUSING UNITS 5 10 15 15 POPULATION 14 27 41 SCHOOL CHILDREN 41 41 41 Elementary 1 Middle 2 3 3 3 1 1 2 2 2 High School 1 1 2 2 TOTAL 2 5 2 COUNTY EMPLOYEES 7 7 7 0.07 0.14 0.21 0.21 0.21 SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYEES 0.10 0.21 0.31 0.31 0.31 TAX BASE ($1000) 441 895 1362 1402 1442 COUNTY OPERATING BUDGET ($) Revenues 5316 10845 16595 17076 17571 Expenditures 7276 14975 23114 23784 24474 BALANCE -1960 -4130 -6519 -6708 SCHOOL DISTRICT -6903 OPERATING BUDGET ($) Revenues 10485 21578 33306 34271 Expenditures 10485 21578 33306 35265 BALANCE 0 0 0 34270 35265 0 0 YEAR 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 HOUSING UNITS 15 15 15 15 POPULATION 41 41 11 SCHOOL CHILDREN 41 41 41 Elementary 3 3 3 3 Middle 2 2 2 High School 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 TOTAL 7 7 7 7 COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0.21 0.21 1 SCHOOL DISTRICT 0'21 0.21 0.21 EMPLOYEES 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 TAX BASE ($1000) 1484 1527 1571 1617 1664 COUNTY OPERATING BUDGET ($) Revenues 18081 18605 19144 19700 20271 Expenditures 25184 25914 26666 27439 28235 BALANCE -7103 -7309 -7521 -7739 -7964 SCHOOL DISTRICT OPERATING BUDGET ($) Revenues 36288 37340 38423 39538 40684 Expenditures 36288 37340 38423 39538 40684 BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 2 (: U jj 24 included in the Declaration for the major that will demonstrate their consent to the division of Mincey Farm. The Planning Staff recommends approval of the Concept Plan for Mincey Farm Subdivision with public roads built to State standards and the conditions contained in the Resolution of Approval (a copy is an attachment to these minutes on pages ) . Eidenier asked what would happen if one of the property owners of the minor subdivision lots did not wish to see further subdivision and refused to sign the statement . Cameron responded that would be a condition that could not be met by the applicant, thus, preliminary approval would expire. Eidenier asked if there are any existing dwellings on these lots or the other minor subdivision lots . Cameron responded no. Burklin asked the size of lots B, C, and D. Cameron responded that those lots are probably two to three acres in size. Eidenier asked if there would be any possibility of access to Latta Road through lot D. Cameron responded that Latta Road parallels the tract and then curves behind it. She continued that there is an easement from Latta Road at the back of this property that allows access to two land- locked parcels . Burklin asked if Cameron had investigated the wet weather drain. Cameron responded that it was a gradual grass swale. There is no channel. It is to accommodate any outflow from the pond. She noted that Erosion Control is requiring a 30-foot drainage easement along the swale crossing lots A5 and E3 through E6 . Burklin asked if it would affect construction on lot E6. Waddell asked if construction on E5 would be affected. Eidenier asked about access to E4 . The response was no. Cameron emphasized again that it was a gradual grass swale. She indicated she felt there would be no problems with construction sites or driveways. She also noted that the plat had been approved by Environmental Health. MOTION: Waddell moved approval as recommended by the Planning Staff. Seconded by Scott. 25 VOTE: Unanimous. (2 ) James R. Boldin Presentation by Emily Cameron. The property is located in Bingham Township on the south side of Old Greensboro Highway (SR 1005 ) between Wildcat Creek Road (SR 1953 ) and White Cross Road (SR 1951 ) . It is zoned Agricultural Residential. Adjacent land uses are residential. A minor subdivision was approved in October 1991 which created four 1 . 85-acre lots and the Class B private road, with 13 . 02 acres remaining. The proposed division of the 13-acre tract is a major subdivision due to the fact that the previous subdivision was recorded less than twenty-four months ago. Four (4 ) new residential lots are proposed which average 3 . 25 acres in size. Lots 1 and 3 do not have approved areas for sewage disposal and will be restricted for development. Lot 2 will be served by an individual well and septic tank. The new Lot 4 has an existing residence on it. The applicant proposes to extend Willie Boldin Road as a Class B private road to serve the proposed lots. The private road justification and the Staff 's evaluation are attachments to these minutes on pages . The private road is justified with larger lots and larger building setbacks. The Concept Plan for the Boldin Subdivision was reviewed by the Planning Board on September 21 , 1992 . The Planning Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan for the James R. Boldin Subdivision with a Class B private road and subject to the conditions included in the Resolution of Approval (a copy an attachment to these minutes on pages ) • Waddell asked what could be done on lots 1 & 3 . Cameron responded that there could be gardening and/or a shed for storing tools. There was a ball field on a portion of lot #3 at one time . She continued that there is the potential for obtaining an easement in the future from lands to the south. • .