Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 01-19-1993 - VIII-H 1 ORANGE C O U N T Y BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: January 19, 1993 Agenda Abstract Item # SUBJECT: 1993 HISTORIC SURVEY & PLANNING GRANT APPLICATION DEPARTMENT: Planning PUBLIC HEARING: Yes X No ATTACHMENTS: INFORMATION CONTACT: Application Planning Director X2592 PHONE NUMBERS: Hillsborough 732-8181 Mebane 227-2031 Durham 688-7331 Chapel Hill 967-9251 PURPOSE: To consider an application for 1993 Historic Survey and Planning Grant Funds. BACKGROUND: The N.C. Historic Preservation Office (HPO) has announced the application period for 1993 Survey and Planning Grant Funds. Eligible projects include architectural and archaeological surveys, preparation of nominations to the National Register of Historic Places, and preservation plans. This year, an estimated $130, 000 is available for survey and planning grants to communities or nonprofit organizations. Of the total amount, $70, 000 is reserved for grants in communities that participate in the Certified Local Government (CLG) program. The remaining communities, including Orange County, may apply for grants from the remaining $60,000. Grant funds are awarded on a matching basis with awards generally in the $5, 000-$15, 000 range. Grant applications must be completed and submitted to the HPO by January 31, 1993. Grant awards will be announced in March, 1993, and projects must be completed by July 31, 1994. In January, 1992, Orange County applied for a $17,000 grant to conduct an inventory of historic sites and structures in the remaining unincorporated portions of the county. The historic inventory of Chapel Hill Township, Phase I of the countywide inventory, was completed in July, 1992, following receipt of a 1991 grant award. 2 Discussions with HPO representatives have indicated that two counties are expected to submit applications for new grant funding. Also anticipated is an additional application to complete a county inventory currently underway. Because of the cost associated with these projects, and the limited amount of funding that will be available for non-CLG jurisdictions, HPO has suggested that Orange County consider applying for designation as a CLG. (A separate agenda abstract addresses procedures for such designation. ) CLG's generally have completed their inventories and have more latitude in terms of funding requests. The third phase of Orange County's historic preservation project, and the one for which 1993 Survey and Planning Grants Funds are being requested, is to consist of two parts, including the publication of a county-wide inventory and an inventory of archaeological sites. Orange County is to seek the support of municipalities and private interests in actually publishing the inventory. According to the HPO, the cost of preparing the manuscript, including photograph collection, is an eligible expense of grant funds. A consultant is to be sought to undertake the archaeological inventory. Phase III is estimated to cost $35,200, including $15, 000 in grant funds, $15, 000 in County matching funds, and $5,200 in in-kind services. It is estimated that the archaeological survey would cost approximately $20, 000, excluding in-kind contributions. Inventory manuscript preparation is estimated at $10,000. The fourth phase is to consist of preparing an Historic Preservation Element as part of the Comprehensive Plan and preparing nominations for the National Register of Historic Places. The Planning Department is to prepare the Historic Preservation Element. A consultant is to be sought to prepare the National Register nominations. At a special meeting on January 13, 1993, the Historic Preservation Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the application for CLG funds be submitted to the SHPO. RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that the County Manager be authorized to apply for up to $15,000 from the CLG Survey and Planning Grant Program. The amount would be matched by $15, 000 from Orange County and would be used to conduct an archaeological inventory and prepare the historic inventory manuscript. pkr it-/',...- 93 riff' 11 1993 CLG SURVEY AND PLANNING GRANT APPLICATION NorthState Historic Preservation Office , Carolina Division of Archives and History I. PROJECT INFORMATION (Please type or print with black ink) Project Title: Phase III of Orange County Historic Resources Inventory Project Type: Archaeological Survey: X Architectural Survey: National Register Nominations: Other (specify) : Inventory Manuscript Local Matching Funds: (non-federal) Attach separate list of necessary Donor: Orange County Source: General Fund Date Available: Available now but also on 7/1/93 Kind (cash/other) : Cash Amount: $15,000 II. APPLICANT INFORMATION Contact Person: Marvin Collins Title: Planning Director Address: 306F Revere Road, Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 Telephone(s) : 919/732-8181 Extension 2592 FAX: 919/644-3002 Applicant Organization or Agency: Orange County Certified Local Government (date application/certification) : 1/20/93 Local Project Coordinator: Same as Contact Person (see above) Address: el=••hone: // ///� John Link, County Manager 1/20/93 SI TURE /fITt Officer of Sponsoring Organization DATE III. STRACT OF PROPOSED PROJECT: On a separate sheet of paper, please describe in one well developed paragraph exactly what will be accomplished with the grant and matching funds, including in-kind. Applications for architectural surveys should include an estimate of the number of acres and properties to be surveyed. Historic Preservation Office staff are available for assistance in developing the project description, including an estimated budget. This abstract may also include one or two other paragraphs describing methods to be employed or information on how the proposed project fits into an overall plan of preservation activities for your community. For example, if this is Phase II of a four-phased action plan, what was Phase I and when was it completed, and how will Phases III and IV build on Phases I and II? PLEASE LIMIT THE ABSTRACT TO THREE DOUBLE-SPACED TYPEWRITTEN PAGES. pep /73 l=I 1993 CLG SURVEY AND PLANNING GRANT APPLICATION FORM Page 2 IV. BUDGET: AN ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COSTS * (1) (2) Line Items Grant Funds Cash Match In-Kind Match Total Principal Consultant/ $ 9,705 _$ 9,705 $ 19,410 Investigator Secretary $ 1,800_ 1,800_ Project Coordinator 1.800 1,800 Other Personnel (specify) 3,170 3,170 6,340 Assistant to Principal Consultant Office Space 600 600 Telephone 200 200 Travel and Per Diem 3,333 miles @ .225/mile 375 375 750 _30 days @ _55/day X 2 1,650 1,650 3,300_ Film and Developing 100 100 100 300 Office Supplies/Maps 250 250 Advertising Costs Camera (purchase/rental) Printing and Copying 200 200 Other (specify) 250 250 Postage TOTALS $ 15,000 _$ 15,000 $ 5,200 $ 35,200 * Budget Notes: (1) Cash funds must be available for payment of salaries, travel, film and developing. Be sure that grant funds are matched with sufficient non- federal cash match to meet this requirement. (2) In-kind contributions could include office space, telephone costs, photocopying, supplies, indirect costs and project coordination, provided they are essential to the project and properly documented. Matching funds must constitute 50% of actual costs. Send by January 31, 1993 (With Equal Opportunity Statement) to: Lloyd Childers, State Historic Preservation Office N.C. Division of Archives and History 109 E. Jones Street, Raleigh, N.C. 27601-2807 pjjq93 STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE DIVISION OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES Addendum to Subgrant Applications EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT THE NORTH CAROLINA HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROGRAM RECEIVES FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR IDENTIFICATION AND PRESERVATION OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES. UNDER TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 AND SECTION 504 OF THE REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973, THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PROHIBITS DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF RACE, COLOR, CREED, NATIONAL ORIGIN, SEX, RELIGION, AGE OR HANDICAP IN ITS FEDERALLY-ASSISTED PROGRAMS. IF YOU BELIEVE YOU HAVE BEEN DISCRIMINATED AGAINST IN ANY PROGRAM, ACTIVITY OR FACILITY, AS DESCRIBED ABOVE, OR IF YOU DESIRE FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE WRITE TO: OFFICE OF EQUAL OPPORTUNITY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT 0 INTERIOR, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20240. Signed: ti Title: 0 an.e Coun Man-.er Date of ' 'gning: January 20, 1993 Project: Phase III of Historic Resources Inventory_ Note: Acknowledgement of the Equal Opportunity Statement above shall accompany each application for federal funding. Receipt of this signed and dated statement will fulfill this requirement. r• Q ,-•∎•,,,,or ,yam • PRIDE . a n United States Department of the Interior AMERICA■ Y•• NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ®� • • 4 a9. Southeast Regional Office 75 Spring Street,S.W. IN REPLY REFER TO: Atlanta,Georgia 30303 MAR i J 1993 Dr. William S. Price, Jr. Director '� Department of Cultural Resources. Division of Archives and History 109 East Jones Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 Re: Certified Local Government Proposal for Orange County, North Carolina Dear Dr. Price: We have completed our review of the above referenced Certified Local Government proposal and have determined that it meets the requirements of 36 CFR, Part 61. The date the Certification Agreement is signed by all parties will be the effective date of certification. Please send us a copy . . of the agreement after it is signed. If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Frank Miele, Southeast Regional Office CLG Coordinator, at (404) 730-2282. Sincerely, Q 4- Cecil N. McKithan, Chief National Register Programs Division cc: LMs. Lloyd Childers . • /-/f-Y5 ORANGE COUNTY HILLSBOROUGH NORTH CAROLINA ..$1areae.14 zce- cc ta/ eol1762 January 20, 1993 Ms. Lloyd Childers State Historic Preservation Office N.C. Division of Archives and History 109 East Jones Street Raleigh, N.C. 27601-2807 Dear Ms. Childers: At its January 19, 1993 meeting, the Orange County Board of Commissioners authorized me to submit the enclosed applications for designation as a Certified Local Government (CLG) and a 1993 CLG Survey and Planning Grant Funds. Although Orange County has not been designated a CLG, the County is hopeful of obtaining such status. If, for some reason, CLG designation is not made, Orange County requests that this application be considered for non-CLG Survey and Planning funding. As noted in the application, we wish to conduct an archaeological survey of Orange County and prepare the manuscript for our inventory publication. The project represents Phase III of a comprehensive historic preservation program which will become an integral part of our comprehensive planning process. Phase II is currently underway and involves an inventory of all unincorporated portions of Orange County except Chapel Hill Township. The inventory of that township was completed in June, 1992 as Phase I of our program. Should you have any questions about either application, please feel free to contact Marvin Collins, Planning Director for Orange County. He will be the Contact Person as well as the Project Coordinator. He can be reached at (919) 732-8181 - Extension 2592 . Sin r- ly, •n R. in County Manager CC: Marvin Collins, Planning Director III Application for Certified Local Government Status { Orange County, North Carolina r i Attachment 1 Applicant Information Sheet i a NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY CERTIFICATION APPLICATION FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS Applicant Information Sheet Name of Local Government(s) : Orange County, North Carolina Name of Historic Properties or District Commission(s) : Orange County Historic Preservation Commission Name, address, and phone number of local government staff person responsible for operations of historic properties or district commission and for meeting requirements for certifications: Marvin E. Collins, Planning Director, Orange County, N.C. 306E Revere Road, Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 (919) 732-8181 Extension 2592 Is the local government seeking expanded responsibility for any of the following functions? Preparation of National Register nominations Review of Tax Act certification applications Environmental review pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act X NOT SEEKING EXPANDED RESPONSIBILITY If the local government has not designated any historic properties or historic districts pursuant to a local ordinance, what measures has it taken to identify, protect, and promote the preservation of historic properties or districts? (please use separate sheet) See Attachment #6 Is there another historic properties or historic district commission within the jurisdiction(s) of the local government(s) applying for certification? X yes no Note: According to the CLG guidelines, only one local commission may exist per local jurisdiction for CLG designated activities (see guidelines). If yes, has your commission consulted the other commission about the sharing of CLG responsibilities? yes no ,III ill � d Attachment 2 Assurance Form NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CULTURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY CERTIFICATION OF APPLICATION FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS Assurance Form I, Moses Carey, Jr. , Chair of the Board of County Commissioners, am the chief elected official of the County of Orange. I hereby certify that the County of Orange will fulfill all of the standards for designation as a "Certified Local Government" contained in the National Historic Preservation Act Amendments of 1980 (P.L. 96-515) , and "Guidelines for North Carolina's Certified Local Government Program". I further state that Marvin Collins, Planning Director, a paid member of the Planning and Inspection Department's staff, will be responsible for the County of Orange meeting the responsibilities of the certification agreement to be signed by the County of Orange and the Division of Archives and History, North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources. I affix my signature on this 20th day of January, 1993. Signature Attachment 3 Historic Preservation Commission Ordinance \1 AN ORDINANCE CREATING THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF ORANGE COUNTY WHEREAS, the historic heritage of the State of North Carolina is one of our most valued and important assets; and WHEREAS, the North Carolina General Statutes authorize counties to safeguard the heritage of the County by preserving any historic sites therein that embody important elements of its cultural, social, economic, political, archaeological or architectural history and to promote the use and conservation of such site for the education, pleasure and enrichment of the 'residents of the County and State as a whole; and WHEREAS, the conservation of historic sites will stabilize and increase the values in their areas and strengthen the overall economy of the State; and WHEREAS, the County Commissioners of Orange County desire to safeguard the heritage of the county by preserving historic landmarks and historic districts; to enhance the environmental quality of neighborhoods; to establish and improve property values; and to foster economic development; and WHEREAS, the County Commissioners of Orange County do therefore desire to create a commission to be known as the Historic Preservation Commission of Orange County to perform the duties of regulating historic landmarks and historic districts pursuant to NCGS Chapter 160A, Article 19 , Part 3C and the provisions of this ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE COUNTY AS FOLLOWS: Article 1. Historic Preservation Commission Section 1.1 Establishment Under the authority of Chapter 160A, Article 19 , Part 3C, of the North Carolina General Statutes, there is hereby established the Orange County Historic Preservation Commission, hereafter referred to as the "Commission" , consisting of seven (7 ) members . Members shall serve without compensation, but they may be reimbursed for incidental expenses incurred in connection with official duties . Section 1.2 Qualifications Each member shall reside within the territorial jurisdiction of Orange County. In addition, a majority of the members of the Commission shall have demonstrated special interest, experience or education in, history, architecture, landscape architecture, archaeology or related fields . Section 1. 3 Tenure Each member of the Commission shall be appointed by the Board of County Commissioners . The tenure of office shall be three (3 ) years, and appointments shall be made so that one- third ( 1/3 ) of the terms expire in February of each calendar year. Members are eligible for reappointment for a second consecutive full term. However, after two (2 ) consecutive terms, a member shall be ineligible for reappointment for one year after the expiration of the previous terms . In determining eligibility of reappointment, appointments made to fill vacancies for unexpired terms shall not be counted as a term. Section 1.4 Meetings A quorum for conducting business of the Commission shall be a`.majority of the appointed members . The Commission shall meet at least once each month; provided, however, ' a regularly scheduled meeting may be canceled due to inclimate weather, due to the lack of a quorum of members or due to a lack of business to conduct. All meetings of the Commission shall be open to the public, and the Commission shall cause notices to be given as required by Article 33-C, Chapter 143 of the North Carolina General Statutes, G. S . 143-318 . 11 ET. SEQ. , as amended. A public record shall be kept of the Commission's resolutions ,' proceedings, and actions . Section 1.5 Attendance of Meetings Attendance at the regular meetings of the Commission shall be considered a prerequisite for maintenance of membership on the Commission. The County Commissioners may declare a vacancy on the Commission because of a member' s non-attendance. Absence due to sickness, death of an immediate family member or similar reason shall be considered approved absences and shall not affect the member' s status . In the tl' event of long illness or other cause for prolonged absence, the member shall be replaced. Section 1 .6 Rules of Procedure Prior to any official action, the Commission shall adopt rules of procedure governing its meetings and the conduct of official business, and bylaws governing the election of officers and related matters . The Commission may appoint advisory bodies and committees as appropriate. Section 1 .7 Powers and Duties The powers and duties of the Commission are as follows : 1 . Undertake an inventory of properties of historical, prehistorical, architectural, and/or cultural significance. 2 . Recommend to the County Commissioners areas to be designated by ordinance as "historic districts " and individual structures, buildings, sites , areas or objects to be designated by ordinance as "landmarks " . 3 . Recommend to the County Commissioners that designation of any area as a historic district, or part thereof, or - designation of any building, structure, site, area or ' object as a landmark, be revoked or removed for cause. 4 . Review and act upon proposals for alterations, demolition or new construction within historic districts, or for the alteration or demolition of designated landmarks . 5 . Conduct an educational program with respect to historic districts and landmarks within its jurisdiction. 6 . Cooperate with State, Federal, and local governments in pursuance of the purposes of this ordinance, and to offer or request assistance, aid, guidance or advice concerning matters under its purview or of mutual interest. The County Commissioners , or the Commission when authorized by the Commissioners , may contract with the State or the United States , or any agency of either, or with any other organization provided the terms are not inconsistent with State or Federal law. 7 . Enter, solely in performance of its official duties and only at reasonable times, upon private lands for examination or survey thereof . However, no member, employee or agent of the Commission may enter any private building or structure without express consent of the owner or occupant thereof. 8 . Prepare and recommend the official adoption of a Preservation Element as part of the Comprehensive Plan. 9 . Recommend to the Board of County Commissioners that it acquire by any lawful means the fee or any lesser included interest, including options to purchase, to properties within established districts or to any such properties designated as landmarks; to hold, manage, preserve, restore and improve the same; and to exchange or dispose of the property by public or private sale, lease or otherwise, subject to covenants or other legally binding restrictions which will secure appropriate rights of public access and promote the preservation of the property. Article 2 . Procedures for Establishing Historic Districts Historic districts , as provided for in this Section, may be designated, amended or repealed, but not until the following procedures have been carried out. Where historic districts are to be designated, they shall be established as districts which overlay other zoning districts as set forth in the Orange County Zoning Ordinance. Section 2 . 1 Inventory Required As a guide for the identification and evaluation of historic districts, the Commission shall, at the earliest possible time and consistent with the resources available to it, undertake an inventory of properties of historical, architectural, prehistorical, and cultural significance within the unincorporated portions of Orange County. Following completion of the inventory, the Commission shall submit a copy of the inventory as expeditiously as possible to the Division of Archives and History. The Commission shall also notify each property owner of the significance of his/her property and/or the structures located thereon. The Commission shall also inform the property owner of the procedures for designation of historic districts . Section 2 .2 Preparation of Designation Report If, upon completion of the inventory and the notification of property owners, a property owner or property owners, the Commission or the Board of Commissioners wishes to recommend the designation of a historic district or districts, the Planning and Inspections Department shall make or cause to be made an investigation and report which includes the following: 1 . The names and addresses of the current owners of property in the proposed district(s ) . 2 . A map showing the boundaries of the proposed district(s) . 3 . Photographs that clearly depict the buildings, structures, sites, areas or objects included in the proposed district(s) . 4 . An assessment of the significance of the buildings , structures, sites, areas or objects in terms of their historical, prehistorical, architectural, or cultural importance. The assessment should include an architectural or archaeological description, including the date of construction and any later alterations . 5 . Proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Atlas to establish the historic district as an overlay zoning district. 6 . Proposed design review principles and guidelines governing exterior changes to buildings, structures, and appurtenant features within the historic district. Section 2 .3 Initial Consideration of Designation Report by Commission Upon completion of the designation report, the. Planning and Inspection. Department shall submit its findings to the Commission. Prior to the meeting of the Commission at which the report will be considered, written notice shall be sent by certified mail to all affected property owners not less than seven (7 ) days before the meeting date. Property owners are those whose names and addresses are currently listed in the Orange County tax records . At the meeting, the Commission may accept the designation report, accept it with amendments, reject it or recommend it for further study. No historic district shall be accepted for designation unless it is deemed to be of • special significance in terms of its historical, prehistorical, architectural or cultural importance. Such district must also possess integrity of design, setting, workmanship, materials, feeling and/or association. If the report is accepted or accepted with amendments , the Commission shall forward a copy to the N.C. Department of Cultural Resources and the Planning Board in accordance with the provisions of Sections 2 . 4 and 2 . 5 below. Section 2 .4 Review by the N.C. Department of Cultural Resources The N. C. Department of Cultural Resources, acting through the State Historic Preservation Officer or his or her designee, shall have made an analysis of and recommendations concerning such report and description of proposed boundaries . Failure of the Department to submit its written analysis and recommendations to the Commission within thirty (30) calendar days after a written request for such analysis has been received by the N. C. Department of Cultural Resources shall relieve the Commission and the Board of County Commissioners of any responsibility for awaiting such analysis . Changes in the boundaries of an initial district or proposals for additional districts shall also be submitted to the N. C. Department of Cultural Resources in accordance with the provisions this Section. Section 2 .5 Review by the Planning Board With respect to the initial establishment of a historic district, the designation report and the review comments of the N. C. Department of Cultural Resources shall be referred to the Planning Board for its review and comment. The Commission may also, in its discretion, refer the report and the proposed boundaries to any other interested body for its recommendations . Failure of the Planning Board to provide its comments to the Commission within .forty-five (45) calendar days after a request for such comments has been received by the Planning Board shall relieve the Commission of any responsibility for awaiting such comments . Changes in the boundaries of an initial district or proposals for additional districts shall also be submitted to the Planning Board in accordance with the provisions this Section. Section 2 . 6 Final Consideration of Designation Report by Commission Upon receipt of comments from the N. C. Department of Cultural Resources, or the expiration of the 30-day period specified in Section 2 . 4, and the Planning Board, the Commission may recommend to the Board of County Commissioners that the historic district be designated. Prior to the meeting of the Commission at which the recommendation will be considered, written notice shall be sent to all affected property owners in accordance with the notification procedures set forth in Section 2 . 3 above. If the Commission recommends that the historic district be designated, it shall submit a copy of the designation report, the comments of the N. C. Department of Cultural Resources and the Planning Board, and the minutes of the meetings at which the designation was considered to the Board of County Commissioners, requesting that a joint public hearing as required by Section 2 . 7 be called on the proposal . Section 2 .7 Public Hearing and Notice Thereof A joint public hearing involving the Commission, the Planning Board, and the Board of County Commissioners shall be held before adoption of a proposed ordinance designating a historic district. The public hearing shall be advertised, and property owners shall be notified, in accordance with the provisions of Article 20 - Amendments of the Zoning Ordinance. Section 2 .8 Planning Board Action Subsequent to Public Hearing Within 60 days following the date of the public hearing, the Planning Board shall prepare and submit to the Commission a recommendation concerning the disposition of the proposed historic district designation. The Planning Board may recommend: 1 . Approval of the designation as proposed; 2 . Approval of the designation subject 'to conditions; or 3 . Denial of the designation. Failure of the Planning Board to submit a recommendation within the required time shall be considered a favorable recommendation, without conditions . Section 2 .9 Commission Action Subsequent to Public Hearing Upon receipt of the Planning Board recommendation, the Commission shall prepare and submit to the Board of Commissioners a recommendation concerning the disposition of the proposed ordinance. The Commission may recommend: 1 . Approval of the designation as proposed; 2 . Approval of the designation subject to conditions; or 3 . Denial of the designation. If the Commission recommends approval of the historic district designation, it shall include the recommendation of the Planning Board and the minutes of the meeting at which the designation was considered by the Commission. Section 2 . 10 Board Action Subsequent to Public Hearing Upon complying with the historic district designation procedures set forth above, the Board of Commissioners may consider the adoption and from time to time the amendment or repeal of an ordinance designating a historic district. However, the Board of Commissioners shall not consider enactment of a proposed ordinance until 60 days after the date of the public hearing or until the Commission prepares its recommendation, whichever comes first . The Board of Commissioners may: 1 . Approve the designation as proposed; 2 . Approve the designation subject to conditions; or 3 . Deny the designation. Upon the establishment of a historic district, its boundaries shall be shown on the official Orange County Zoning Atlas, and the use and development of any land or structure within a historic district shall comply with use regulations and dimensional requirements applicable to the underlying zoning district. For each building, structure, site, area or object located in the historic district, the waiting period set forth in Section 4 . 9 of this ordinance shall be observed prior to its demolition. Article 3. Procedures for Designating Historic Landmarks Historic landmarks, as provided for in this Section, may be designated, amended or repealed, but not until the following procedures have been carried out. Section 3 . 1 Inventory Required As a guide for the identification and evaluation of landmarks , the Commission shall, at the earliest possible time and consistent with the resources available to it, undertake an inventory of properties of historical, architectural, prehistorical, and cultural significance within the unincorporated portions of Orange County. Following completion of the inventory, the Commission shall submit a copy of the inventory as expeditiously as possible to the Division of Archives and History. The Commission shall also notify each property owner of the significance of his/her property and/or the structures located thereon. The Commission shall also inform the property owner of the procedures for requesting designation of his/her property as a historic landmark. Section 3 . 2 Procedure for Submission of Application for Designation To receive consideration for designation of a property as a historic landmark, a property owner must make application on forms provided by the Commission. Application for such designation is on a voluntary basis by the owner as currently listed in the Orange County tax records . Section 3 .3 Preparation of Designation Report The Planning and Inspections Department shall, within 30-days of the receipt of an application, make or cause to be made an investigation and report on the historic, architectural, archaeological or cultural significance of the building, structure, site, area or object proposed for designation. The 30-day period may be extended with the consent of the applicant. Such report shall consist of a concise statement of exactly what is being proposed for designation and shall include, but not be limited to, the following: 1 . The name and address of the current property owner. 2 . A map showing the location of the property, including any buildings and appurtenant features . 3 . Photographs that clearly depict the building, structure, site, area or object proposed for designation, including facades , details, and siting. Where outbuildings are proposed for designation, they shall be described, photographed, and mapped as well. 4 . An assessment of the significance of the site and/or structure in terms of its historical, prehistorical, architectural, or cultural importance . The assessment should include an architectural or II archaeological description and a historical discussion of the site and/or structure, including the date of construction and any later alterations . Where land is included in the proposed designation, the report shall clearly justify its inclusion. Section 3 .4 Initial Consideration of Designation Report by Commission The Planning and Inspection Department shall submit the application for historic landmark designation and accompanying designation report to the Commission at the first regular meeting after the expiration of the 30-day period specified in Section 3 . 3 or any extension thereof . Prior to the meeting of the Commission at which the application and report will be considered, written notice shall be sent by certified mail to the affected property owner and all adjacent owners not less than seven (7 ) days before the meeting date. Adjacent property owners are those whose names and addresses are currently listed in the Orange County tax records and whose property lies within 500 feet of the affected property. At the meeting, the Commission may accept the designation report, accept it with amendments, reject it or recommend it for further study. No property shall be accepted for designation as a landmark unless it is deemed and found by the Commission to be of special significance in term of its historical, prehistorical, architectural, or cultural importance, and to possess integrity of design, setting, workmanship, materials, feeling, and/or association. If the report is accepted or accepted with amendments, the Commission shall forward a copy to the N.C. Department of Cultural Resources in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 .5 below. Section 3 .5 Review by the N.C. Department of Cultural Resources The N.C. Department of Cultural Resources, acting through the State Historic Preservation Officer or his or her designee shall, either upon request of the Department or at the initiative of the Commission, be given an opportunity to review and comment upon the substance and effect of the designation of any landmark. All comments will be provided in writing. If the Department does not submit its comments • to the Commission within thirty (30 ) days following receipt by the Department of the report, the Commission and the Board of County Commissioners shall be relieved of any responsibility to consider such comments . Section 3 . 6 Final Consideration of Designation Report by Commission Upon receipt of comments from the N. C. Department of Cultural Resources or the expiration of the 30-day period specified in Section 3 . 5, the Commission may recommend to the Board of County Commissioners that the property be designated as a historic landmark. Prior to the meeting of the Commission at which the recommendation will be considered, written notice shall be sent to the affected property owner and all adjacent owners in accordance with the notification procedures set forth in Section 3 . 4 above . If the Commission recommends that the property be designated as a historic landmark, it shall submit a copy of the designation report, the comments of the N.C. Department of Cultural Resources, the minutes of the meetings at which the designation was considered, and a proposed ordinance of designation to the Board of County Commissioners, requesting that a joint public hearing as required by Section 3 . 7 be called on the proposed ordinance. Section 3 .7 Public Hearing and Notice Thereof 'A joint public hearing involving the Commission and the Board of County Commissioners shall be held before adoption of a proposed ordinance designating a historic landmark. Notice of the public hearing shall be published once a week for two successive calendar weeks . The notice shall give the date, time, and place of the public hearing, and shall be published the first time not less than 10 days nor more than 25 days before the date fixed for the hearing. In computing such period, the day of publication is not to be included but. the day of the hearing shall be included. Written notice shall also be sent by certified mail to the affected property owner and all adjacent owners not less than 15 days before the hearing date. Adjacent property owners are those whose names and addresses are currently listed in the Orange County tax records and whose property lies within 500 feet of the affected property. Section 3 . 8 Commission Action Subsequent to Public Hearing • • Within 60 days following the date of the public hearing, the Commission shall prepare and submit to the Board of Commissioners a recommendation concerning the disposition of the proposed ordinance. The Commission may recommend: 1 . Adoption of the ordinance as proposed; 2 . Adoption of ordinance subject to conditions; or 3 . Denial of the ordinance. Failure of the Commission to submit a recommendation within the required time shall be considered a favorable recommendation, without conditions . The time limit may be extended upon request of the applicant. Section 3 . 9 Board Action Subsequent to Public Hearing Upon complying with the required landmark designation procedures set forth above, the Board of Commissioners may consider the adoption and from time to time the amendment or repeal an ordinance designating a historic landmark. The ordinance shall contain a concise statement of exactly what is designated as a landmark, the name or names of the owner or owners of the property, those elements of the property that are integral to its historical, architectural or prehistorical value, including the land area of the property so designated, and any other information the governing board deems necessary. For each building, structure, site, area or object so designated as a landmark, the ordinance shall require that the waiting period set forth in Section 4 . 9 this ordinance be observed prior to its demolition. The Board of Commissioners shall not consider enactment of a proposed ordinance until 60 days after the date of the public hearing or until the Commission prepares its recommendation, whichever comes first. The Board of Commissioners may: 1 . Approve the adoption of the ordinance as proposed; 2 . Approve the adoption of the ordinance subject to conditions; or 3 . Deny the adoption of the ordinance. If the Board of Commission denies the adoption of an ordinance designating a historic landmark, written notice shall be sent by certified mail to the property owner within five (5) working days of the Board' s decision. Section 3 . 10 Action Subsequent to Board Approval Upon adoption of the ordinance, the owners and occupants of each landmark shall be given written notification of such " designation by certified mail . In addition, copies of the ordinance and all amendments thereto shall be distributed as follows : 1 . A copy of the ordinance and all amendments thereto shall be filed by the Commission in the Office of the Register of Deeds . Each landmark shall be indexed according to the name of the owner of the property in the grantor and grantee indexes in the Register of Deeds Office and the Commission shall pay a reasonable fee for filing and indexing. 2 . A copy of the ordinance and all amendments thereto shall be kept on file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners and be made available for public inspection at any reasonable time. 3 . A copy of the ordinance and all amendments thereto shall be submitted to the Planning and/or Inspections Department. 4 . A copy of the ordinance and all amendments thereto shall be given to the Tax Supervisor. The designation and any recorded restrictions upon the property limiting its use for preservation purposes shall be considered by the Tax Supervisor in appraising it for tax purposes . ' The fact that a building, structure, site, area or object has been designated a landmark shall be clearly indicated on all tax maps maintained by Orange County for such period as the designation remains in effect. A suitable sign for each property designated as a landmark may be placed on the property at the owner' s consent. Otherwise, the sign may be placed on a nearby public right-of-way. Article 4 . Certificate of Appropriateness Section 4. 1 General Provisions From and after the designation of a landmark or a historic district, no exterior portion of any building or other structure nor any type of above-ground utility structure or outdoor advertising sign shall be erected, altered, restored, moved or demolished on such landmark or within the historic district until after an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness as to exterior features has been submitted to and approved by the Commission. Where a building permit or other permit is required for the purposes of constructing, altering, moving or demolishing buildings or structures, a Certificate of Appropriateness shall be approved by the Commission prior to the issuance of the permits . A Certificate may be issued subject to reasonable conditions but shall be required whether or not a building or other permit is required. For purposes of this ordinance, "exterior features" shall include the following: 1 . The architectural style, general design, and general arrangement of the exterior of a building or other structure, including: a. The kind and texture of the building material; b. The size and scale of the building or structure; and c . The type and style of all windows, doors, fences, steps and pavement, light fixtures, signs, and other appurtenant features . 2 . Historic signs, significant landscapes, and archaeological and natural features of the area. 3 . In the case of outdoor advertising signs, "exterior features" shall be construed to mean the style, material, size and location of all such signs . The Commission shall have no jurisdiction over interior arrangement and shall take no action under this ordinance except to prevent the construction, reconstruction, alteration, restoration, moving or demolition of buildings , structures, appurtenant features, outdoor advertising signs or other significant features which *would .be incongruous with the special character of a historic district or landmark. The State of North Carolina, including its agencies, political subdivisions, and instrumentalities , Orange County, and all public utilities shall be required to obtain a Certificate of Appropriateness for construction, alteration, moving or demolition within a historic district or on designated landmarks . Section 4 .2 Certain Changes Not Prohibited Nothing in this ordinance shall be construed to prevent the ordinary maintenance or repair of any exterior architectural feature in a historic district or on a landmark which does not: 1 . Involve a change in design, materials or outer appearance thereof; or 2 . Involve the construction, reconstruction, alteration, restoration or demolition of any such feature which the Building Inspector shall certify is required by the public safety because of an unsafe or dangerous condition. Nothing herein shall be construed to prevent the maintenance of or, in the event of an emergency, the immediate restoration of any existing above-ground utility structure without approval by the Commission. Section 4 . 3 Administrative Approval of Minor Improvements Minor improvements are defined as those exterior changes which do not involve substantial alterations , additions or removals that could impair the integrity of the property and/or district as a whole. Such minor improvements may be approved by the Planning and Inspections Department but shall be limited to those listed in the Commissions "Bylaws and Rules of Procedure. " All minor improvements applications approved by the Planning and Inspections Department shall be forwarded to the Commission in time for its next scheduled meeting. No application may be denied without the formal action of the Commission. Section 4.4 Application for Certificate of Appropriateness Applications for a Certificate of Appropriateness shall be obtained from and when completed, filed with the Planning and Inspections Department. Each application shall be accompanied by sketches , drawings,--photographs, specifications , descriptions, and other information of sufficient detail to clearly show the proposed exterior alterations, additions, changes or new construction. Applications which are not complete or do not comply with the provisions of this ordinance shall not be accepted by the Planning and Inspections Department but shall be returned to the applicant with a notation of the deficiencies in the application. The Planning and Inspections Department shall, within 30 days of the receipt of an application, make or cause to be • ' made an investigation and report on whether the exterior portion of buildings , structures , and their appurtenant features within historic districts or on buildings, structures, sites, areas or objects designated as landmarks , are congruous with the historic aspects of the district or landmark. The 30-day period may be extended with the consent of the applicant. Section 4 .5 Consideration of Application by Commission The Planning and Inspection Department shall submit the application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to the Commission at the first regular meeting after the expiration of the 30-day period specified in Section 4 . 4 or any extension thereof. Prior to the meeting of the Commission at which the application will be considered, written notice shall be sent by certified mail to the affected property owner and all adjacent owners not less than fifteen ( 15 ) days before the meeting date. Adjacent property owners are those whose names and addresses are currently listed in the Orange County tax records and whose property lies within 500 feet of the affected property. Prior to the issuance or denial of a Certificate of Appropriateness, the applicant and other property owners likely to be materially affected by the application shall be given an opportunity to be heard. When deemed advisable, the Commission may hold a public hearing on any application. Applications for Certificates of Appropriateness shall be acted upon by the Commission within forty-five (45 ) days of the meeting at which the Planning and Inspection Department' s report is submitted. The action on an application shall be approval, approval with conditions or denial . If the application is not acted upon within forty- five (45 ) days, it shall be deemed to be approved and a Certificate shall be issued. An extension of time may be granted by mutual consent of the Commission and the applicant . • Section 4 .6 Review Standards No Certificate of Appropriateness shall be granted unless the Commission finds that the application complies with the principles and guidelines adopted by the Commission for review of exterior changes . It is the intent of these principles and guidelines to insure insofar as possible that the exterior portion of buildings , structures, and their appurtenant features within historic districts or on buildings , structures, sites, areas or objects designated as landmarks, shall be congruous with the historic aspects of the district or landmark. As part of the review procedures , the Commission may view the premises and seek the advice of the N. C. Department of Cultural Resources or other such expert advice as it may deem necessary under the circumstances . The Secretary of the Interior' s " Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings" shall be the sole principles and guidelines used in reviewing applications of the State of North Carolina for Certificates of Appropriateness . Section 4.7 Appeals of Commission Actions In any action granting or denying a Certificate of Appropriateness , an appeal by an aggrieved party may be taken to the Board of Adjustment. Written notice of the intent to appeal must be sent to the Commission, postmarked within thirty (30 ) days following the decision. Appeals shall be in the nature of certiorari. Appeals of decisions of the Board of Adjustment shall be heard by the Superior Court of Orange County. The State of North Carolina shall have a right of appeal to the North Carolina Historical Commission, which shall . render its decision within thirty (30 ) days from the date that' a notice of appeal by the state is received by the Commission. The decision of the Commission shall be final and binding upon both the State and the Commission. Section 4. 8 Time Limitations on Certificates of Appropriateness A Certificate of Appropriateness shall expire six ( 6 ) months after the date of issuance or, in the case of demolition, six ( 6 ) months after the effective date of the Certificate, if the work authorized- by the Certificate has not been commenced. If, 'after commencement, the .work is discontinued for a period of six ( 6 ) months, the Certificate shall expire immediately. No work authorized by a Certificate that has expired shall thereafter be performed until a new Certificate has been secured. Section 4. 9 Delay in Demolition of Landmarks and Buildings within Historic Districts 1 . An application for a Certificate of Appropriateness authorizing the demolition or destruction of a • designated landmark or a building, structure or site within a historic district may not be denied except as provided in Subsection 3 below. However, the effective date of such a Certificate may be delayed for up to 180 days from the date of approval . The period of delay shall be reduced by the Commission if it finds that the owner would suffer extreme hardship or be permanently deprived of all beneficial use or return from such property by virtue of the delay. During the delay period, the Commission shall negotiate with the owner in an effort to find a means of preserving the building, structure or site. If the Commission finds that a building, structure or site has no special significance or value toward maintaining the character of a district, it shall waive all or part of such period of delay and authorize earlier demolition or removal . If the Commission or Planning Board has voted to recommend the designation of a landmark or the designation of an area as a historic district, and final designation has not been made by the County Commissioners, the demolition or destruction of any building, structure or site in the proposed district or on the property of the designated landmark may be delayed by the Commission or the Planning Board for up to 180 days or until the County Commissioners take final action on the designation, which ever occurs first. 2 . The Board of Commissioners may enact an ordinance to prevent the demolition by neglect of any designated ,landmark or any structure or building within the established historic district. Such ordinance shall provide appropriate safeguards to protect property owners from undue hardship. 3 . An application for a Certificate of Appropriateness authorizing the demolition of a building, structure or site determined by the N. C. State Historic Preservation Office as having statewide significance as defined in the criteria of the National Register of Historic Places may be denied except where the Commission finds that the owner would suffer extreme hardship or be permanently deprived of all beneficial use or return by virtue of the denial . Article 5. Remedies and Legal Status Provisions Section 5 . 1 Remedies In case any building, structure, site, area or object designated as a landmark or within a historic district is about to be demolished, whether as a result of deliberate neglect or otherwise, materially altered, remodeled, removed or destroyed, except in compliance with this ordinance, the Board of Commissioners or the Commission, with the approval of the Board of Commissioners, may institute any appropriate action or proceeding to prevent such unlawful demolition, destruction, material alteration, remodeling or removal; to restrain, correct or abate such violation; or to prevent any illegal act or conduct with respect to such a building, structure, site, area or object. Such remedies shall be in addition to any others authorized by Chapter 153A of the North Carolina General Statutes for violation of a county ordinance. Section 5 .2 Conflict with other Laws Whenever this ordinance or any ordinance adopted. pursuant to Part 3C of Article 19 of Chapter 160A of the North Carolina General Statutes requires a longer waiting period or imposes other higher standards with respect to a designated historic landmark or district than are established under any other statute, charter provision or regulation, the provisions of this ordinance shall apply. Whenever the provisions of any other statute, charter provisions, ordinance or regulation require a longer waiting period or impose other higher standards than are established in this ordinance, such statute, charter provision, ordinance or regulation shall govern. Adopted this 1st day of April, 1991. Attachment 4 Historic Preservation Commission Rules of Procedure ORANGE COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Rules of Procedure Adopted April 22, 1992 (Sections 1 - 6) May 27, 1992 (Sections 7 - 11) Table of Contents SECTION 1: Introduction 1 1.1. Purpose 1 1.2. General 1 SECTION 2: Officers i 2.1. General 1 2.2. Chair 1 2.3. Vice Chair 1 2.4. Secretary 1 2.5. Election of Officers 2 2.6. Vacancy 2 SECTION 3: Meetings 2 3.1. Regular Meetings 2 3.2. Special Meetings 2 3.3. Cancellation of Meetings 2 3.4. Quorum 2 3.5. Order of Business 3 3.6. Time Limits 3 3.7. Open Meetings 3 3.8. Agenda 4 3.9. Attendance 4 SECTION 4: Conducting Business 5 4.1. Decisions 5 4.2. Qualifications to Vote 5 4.3. Impartiality Required 5 4.4. Conflict of Interest 5 4.5. Motions 6 4.6. Debate 6 4.7. Procedural Motions 6 4.8. Suspension of Rules 7 SECTION 5: Amendments to Rules of Procedure 8 SECTION 6: Notification of Zoning Change/Permit Applications 8 REVISIONS 8 SECTION 7: Application for Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) 9 7.1. Forms 9 7.2. Submission to Planning Department 9 7.3. Application Fee 9 7.4. Planning Department Review 9 7.5. Application Deadline 9 7.6. Application Information 9 7.7. Additional Exhibits 10 SECTION 8: Consideration of COA by Historic Preservation Commission 10 8.1. Notification of Property Owners 10 8.2. Agenda and Staff Report Mailed to Commission 11 8.3. Hearings 11 SECTION 9: Issuance of a COA 12 9.1. Approval Stamp 12 9.2. Approval of Modified Drawings 12 9.3. COA Expiration 12 SECTION 10: Appeals of Commission Action Involving a COA 12 10.1. Appeals Time Limit 12 SECTION 11: Administrative Approval of COA's 12 11.1. Normal Maintenance 13 11.2. Minor Improvements 13 1.1.3. Major Modifications 14 REVISIONS 15 County of Orange, Historic Preservation Commission Rules of Procedure, Adopted April 22, 1992 RULES OF PROCEDURE SECTION 1: Introduction 1.1. Purpose. To establish procedures for organizing the business of the Orange County Historic Preservation Commission, hereafter referred to as the Commission, in executing its duties and responsibilities. 1.2. General. The Commission shall be governed by the terms of the Historic Preservation Commission Ordinance and by the terms of Chapter 160A, Article 19, Part 3C, of the N.C. General Statutes as they may be amended or revised and by these rules to the extent that they do not conflict with the law. For procedures not covered by these rules, the Commission shall follow the rules contained in Roberts Rules of Order, Revised, except that the legal requirements for Certificates of Appropriateness will supersede Roberts Rules. SECTION 2: Officers 2.1. General. The Commission shall be composed of seven (7) members, the majority of whom shall have demonstrated special interest, experience, or education in history, architecture, landscape architecture, archaeology or related fields. All members shall reside within the territorial jurisdiction of Orange County. 2.2. Chair. The Chair shall preside at all meetings and public hearings, make committee appointments, and decide all points of order and procedure subject to these rules unless directed otherwise by a majority of the Commission in session at that time. The Chair shall have the right to vote but shall not have the right to break a tie vote in which he or she participated. 2.3. Vice Chair. The Vice Chair shall serve as acting Chair in the absence of the Chair and at such time have all the powers, duties, and voting rights as the Chair. 2.4. Secretary. The Orange County Planning Director shall serve as Secretary to the Commission. The Secretary, or his/her designee, subject to the direction of the Chair and Commission, shall keep all records, shall conduct all correspondence of the Commission, and shall generally supervise the clerical work of the Commission. The Secretary, or his/her designee, shall keep the minutes of every meeting of the Commission. The minutes shall show the record of all important 1 County of Orange, Historic Preservation Commission Rules of Procedure, Adopted April 22, 1992 facts pertaining to each meeting, every resolution acted upon by the Commission and all votes of the Commission members upon any recommendation, resolution or upon the final determination of any questions before the Commission, indicating the names of members absent or failing to vote. 2.5. Election of Officers. The Chair and Vice Chair shall be elected annually at the Commission's first meeting in February. The Chair and Vice Chair shall serve terms of one (1) year and shall be eligible for re-election. They shall be eligible to succeed themselves for not more than three (3) terms. A majority of members present shall be necessary to elect officers. 2.6. Vacancy. a. A vacancy in the office of Chair shall be filled by the Vice Chair succeeding to the office for the balance of the unexpired term. b. A vacancy in the office of Vice Chair (including a vacancy due to 2.6.a. above) shall be filled by election of a Vice Chair from the Commission for the balance of the unexpired term. SECTION 3: Meetings 3.1. Regular Meetings. Regular meetings of the Commission shall be held on the fourth Wednesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the Planning & Agricultural Center. Regular meetings will be adjourned at 10:30 p.m. but may be continued past that time with a unanimous vote of members present. When the regular meeting day falls on a legal holiday, the Commission may call a special meeting in accord with Section 3.2 below. 3.2. Special Meetings. Special meetings may be called by the Chair or by written request of two (2) members of the Commission submitted to the Commission or Chair. Written or oral notice of special meetings shall be given to all members at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting and shall state the time, place, and purpose of the meeting. 3.3. Cancellation of Meetings. Whenever there is no business to come before the Commission, the Chair may dispense with a regular meeting by giving notice to all members not less than twenty-four (24) hours prior to the time set for the meeting. 3.4. Ouorum. A quorum shall consist of five (5) members of the 2 . d County of Orange, Historic Preservation Commission Rules of Procedure, Adopted April 22, 1992 Commission. The number required for a quorum shall not be affected by vacancies. A member who has withdrawn from a meeting without being excused by a majority vote of the remaining members present shall be counted as present for the purpose of determining whether or not a quorum is present. 3.5. Order of Business. The order of business at regular meetings shall be as follows: a. Call to Order b. Roll Call c. Introduction of Guests/Visitors d. Consideration of Additions to Agenda e. Approval of Minutes f. Reports g. Public Hearings h. Items for Decision i. Discussion Items j. Informational Items k. Adjournment The order of business may be varied by unanimous consent of the members present. 3.6. Time Limits. a. The Commission may limit the length of a meeting or set a time for adjournment by a concurring vote of a simple majority of those members present. b. The Chair may limit the time each person at a public hearing is allowed to speak. 3.7. Open Meetings. All regular and special meetings, public hearings, records, and minutes of the Commission shall be open to the public, 3 County of Orange, Historic Preservation Commission Rules of Procedure, Adopted April 22, 1992 provided, however, the Commission shall have the power to meet in executive session providing appropriate procedural necessities are complied with as prescribed in North Carolina's Open Meeting Law, N.C. General Statutes, G.S.143-318.1 to 143-318.7 (1974). The press shall be notified by telephone or in person of special meetings at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. 3.8. Agenda. a. The agenda for each regular or special meeting or public hearing shall be prepared by the Secretary of the Commission, following consultation with the Chair. b. The agenda for each meeting shall be mailed to all members no later than five (5) days prior to the scheduled meeting or hearing, except in the case of special meetings called under Section 3.2. in which the agenda will be delivered or orally transmitted, as appropriate, to the members no later than forty- eight (48) hours prior to the scheduled meeting or hearing. c. No business, either old or new, may be considered by the Commission unless such item is approved for consideration by a majority vote of the members present. Such item shall be for discussion purposes only, and no decision shall be made on such item until a subsequent meeting. 3.9. Attendance. a. A member who will be unable to attend the regular meeting of the Commission must contact the Chair or Secretary at least 24 hours before the scheduled meeting and indicate the general reason for being absent. Earlier notification is encouraged. The Commission will be notified of the absence and reason at the meeting. b. Any members of the Commission who miss more than three consecutive meetings or public hearings, or who miss more than one-half of the meetings in a calendar year, for something other than an approved absence as determined by the Chairperson, may lose their status as member of the Commission and may be replaced by the Board of Commissioners. • c. Absence due to sickness, death of an immediate family member, professional leave, or other valid reason shall be considered approved absence and shall not affect the member's status. 4 County of Orange, Historic Preservation Commission Rules of Procedure,Adopted April 22, 1992 d. ti In the event of a long illness or other cause for prolonged absence, the member may be replaced. SECTION 4: Conducting Business 4.1. Decisions. The vote of a majority of those members present shall be sufficient to decide any matter before the Commission, provided a quorum is present. No member shall be excused from voting except as required in Section 4.2. or Section 4.4. In all other cases, a failure to vote by a member who is physically present in the meeting room or who has withdrawn without being excused by a majority vote of the remaining members, shall be recorded as an affirmative vote. A negative vote or a tie vote on a motion to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness shall constitute a disapproval of the application. Voting will be by roll call of the Commission members for decisions related to the issuance of Certificates of Appropriateness or for other business for which a roll call is deemed necessary by the Chair. 4.2. Qualifications to Vote. No Commission member shall vote on any matter before the Commission unless that member shall have attended the Commission's previous deliberations on such matter, or shall otherwise have the approval of the Chair to vote on such matter. The Chair's approval shall be contingent on the assurance by the member that the member has read any material distributed to the Commission members related to the matter and the minutes of any meeting at which the matter was discussed. 4.3. Impartiality Required. No Commission member shall discuss any application with any parties prior to the Commission's deliberations on such application unless the member has notified the Chair in advance of such discussions. The major points of such discussions shall be entered into the record of the minutes of the meeting at which an application is considered. Members may seek and/or receive information pertaining to the application from any other member of the Commission or its staff prior to the hearing. In addition, personal visits to view a site or building prior to the hearing and which do not involve discussions with an applicant are permitted. 4.4. Conflict of Interest. No Commission member shall take part in any hearing, consideration, determination or vote concerning a property in which the Commission member or a close relative (spouse, sibling, child or parent): 5 County of Orange, Historic Preservation Commission Rules of Procedure, Adopted April 22, 1992 - a. Is the applicant before the Commission; b. Owns property within 100 feet of the subject property; or c. Has a financial interest in the subject property or improvements to be undertaken thereon. In addition, a Commission member may request to be excused from taking part in any hearing, consideration, determination or vote concerning a property in which a business associate or employer of the Commission member: d. Is the applicant before the Commission; e. Owns property within 100 feet of the subject property; or f. Has a financial interest in the subject property or improvements to be undertaken thereon. 4.5. Motions. The Commission shall proceed by motion. Any member, including the Chair, may make or second a motion. A substantive motion (non-procedural motion) is out of order while another substantive motion is pending. A motion may be withdrawn by the introducer at any time before a vote. 4.6. Debate. The Chair shall state the motion and then open the floor to debate on it. The member who made the motion is entitled to speak first. A member who has not spoken on the issue shall be recognized before someone who has already spoken. 4.7. Procedural Motions. In addition to substantive motions, the following procedural motions, and no others, shall be in order in the following priority: a. To adjourn. This motion may be made only when action on a pending matter concludes. It may not interrupt deliberations of a pending matter. b. To take a recess. c. Call to follow the agenda. The motion must be made at the first reasonable opportunity or it is waived. d. To suspend the rules. 6 County of Orange,Historic Preservation Commission Rules of Procedure,Adopted April 22, 1992 e. To defer consideration. A substantive motion, consideration of which has been deferred, expires one hundred (100) days thereafter unless a motion to revive consideration is adopted. f. Call of the previous question. The motion is not in order until there has been at least twenty (20) minutes of debate, and every member has had an opportunity to speak once. g. To postpone to certain time or day. h. To refer to a committee. Sixty days after a motion has been referred to a committee, the introducer may compel consideration of the measure by the entire Commission, regardless of whether the committee has reported the matter back to the Commission. i. To amend. An amendment to a motion must be pertinent to the subject matter of the motion, but it may achieve the opposition of the motion's intent. The motion may be amended and an amendment may be amended, but no further amendments may be made. j. To revive consideration. The motion is in order any time up to 100 days after a vote to defer consideration. A substantive motion, consideration of which has been deferred, expires 100 days thereafter unless a motion to revive consideration is adopted. k. To reconsider. The motion must be made by a member who voted with the prevailing side. It must be made at the same meeting as the vote was taken. It cannot interrupt deliberation on a pending matter but is in order at any time before actual adjournment. 1. To rescind or repeal. m. To ratify. 4.8. Suspension of Rules. The Commission may, upon an affirmative vote of five (5) members, suspend these rules of procedure for consideration of any matter before the Commission. 7 County of Orange,Historic Preservation Commission Rules of Procedure,Adopted April 22, 1992 SECTION 5: Amendments to Rules of Procedure These rules may, within the limits allowed by law, be amended at any time by an affirmative vote of not less than five (5) members of the Commission, provided that such amendment shall have first been presented to the membership in writing at a regular or special meeting preceding the meeting at which the vote is taken. SECTION 6: Notification of Zoning Change/Permit Applications In order to facilitate the exercise of the Commission authority and responsibility in promoting, enhancing, and preserving the character and heritage of Orange County, the Commission requests that the Director of Planning notify the Commission of pending applications for zoning changes, use permits, variances and demolition permits, and proposed zoning text amendment or other proposals which affect properties in an existing or proposed historic district and/or structural and landscape resources of historic, architectural, archaeological, visual or cultural significance. ADOPTED: By unanimous vote of the Orange County Historic Preservation Commission on April 22, 1992. REVISIONS N/A : Revised to include Rules of Procedure for processing applications for Certificates of Appropriateness. N/A : Revised to include Rules of Procedure for processing applications for designation as Historic Landmark. N/A : Revised to include Rules of Procedure for processing applications for the designation of Historic Districts. 8 County of Orange, Historic Preservation Commission Rules of Procedure,Adopted May 27, 1992 -. melt SECTION 7: Application for Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) 7.1. Forms. Application forms for a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) are available in the Planning Department. 7.2. Submission to Planning Department. When the applicant has completed the application by providing the information required by Section 7.6., he or she shall submit the completed application to the Planning Department. 7.3. Application Fee. An application fee, of an amount to be approved by the Board of Commissioners, must accompany completed applications. 7.4. Planning Department Review. The Planning Department shall review each application for completeness and for compliance with the other zoning and/or building requirements on the property. 7.5. Application Deadline. The deadline for filing of applications for COA's is 45 days prior to the Commission meeting at which the application is proposed to be heard. 7.6. Application Information. The Commission hereby establishes that the following information and data are necessary to properly evaluate an application for COA, and shall be provided by the applicant. a. Property tax map number and/or parcel identification number (PIN); b. Property address; c. Name of the property owner; d. Owner's address and phone number; e. Name of the applicant (if different than property owner); f. Applicant's address and phone number; g. Date of application; h. Architect (if applicable); i. Architect's address and phone number; j. A written description of proposed changes in the appearance of the exterior of the structure and/or of the site; • 9 County of Orange, Historic Preservation Commission Rules of Procedure, Adopted May 27, 1992 7- _ �'.�:�-"`a - ; .� _. `' k. Four (4) copies of drawings showing building alterations and/or additions to existing structures or showing new construction. As used here, "drawings" will mean plans and exterior elevations drawn to scale, with sufficient detail to show, as far as they relate to exterior appearances, the architectural design of buildings; proposed building materials; site layout, including walls, walks, terraces, parking areas, plantings, accessory buildings, signs, lights, and other physical elements. 1. In the case of an application for a COA for the demolition of an existing structure, the applicant shall submit legible photographs showing all sides of the structure under consideration and photographs showing adjacent structures and the relation of the structure to the site. m. A list of the names and addresses of all property owners within a 500- foot radius of any portion of the property under consideration. n. Any other supporting statements, drawings or material that the applicant may believe will assist in communicating his or her plans for the site and structure. o. If a previous application for COA for the same property has been denied, the applicant shall specify the substantial changes made to the plans for the proposed modification or substantial changes in conditions in the district. If application is made for administrative approval of a COA pursuant to Section 11.2., an applicant shall not be required to provide the information listed in k. and m. above, with the exception of the list of building materials. 7.7. Additional Exhibits. Any exhibit to be presented to the Commission at the time it considers a case must be submitted to the Planning Department at least 24 hours prior to presentation to the Commission. SECTION 8: Consideration of COA by Historic Preservation Commission 8.1. Notification of Property Owners. The Planning Department shall mail a notice to the applicant and owners of property within 500 feet of the property under consideration using the address list provided by the applicant after the addresses have been checked against the Orange County tax listings. The notice will be mailed by certified mail at least fifteen (15) days prior to the Commission meeting at which the case is to be heard. 10 County of Orange, Historic Preservation Commission Rules of Procedure, Adopted May 27, 1992 8.2. Agenda and Staff Report Mailed to Commission. A meeting agenda and a staff report,for each application will be mailed to the Commission members at least five (5) days prior to the meeting at which the application is to be considered. 8.3. Hearings. The Commission shall conduct its hearings as generally outlined below, except that the Chairperson of the Commission may, at his or her discretion, amend the procedures as necessary for the expeditious conduct of the Commission's business. All applications for a COA shall be acted upon within forty-five (45) days of the meeting at which the staff report is presented. Failure to act on an application within the forty-five (45) day period shall mean that the application is deemed approved. The period may be extended to a date certain with the consent of the applicant. a. The Chairperson shall call the hearing to order. b. The Chairperson shall acknowledge that the proceedings are being recorded and that written minutes of the meeting will be kept. The Chairperson may also establish time limits for each side of the issue and for each individual speaker. c. The Chairperson (or Vice Chairperson, if presiding) shall swear in or affirm all witnesses. d. The staff shall present the application background and staff recommendation. e. The Commission shall receive testimony from persons in favor of the COA. f. The Commission shall receive testimony from persons opposed to the COA. g. Discussion of the case by Commission members. h. The Commission shall make its decision and may approve, approve with conditions or deny the application. In making its decision, the Commission shall make findings of fact indicating the extent to which the application is or is not consistent with the historical character and qualities of the historic district and/or historic landmark, whichever is applicable. In the case of a request for a COA for demolition, the Commission shall state the effective date of approval of the COA. 11 County of Orange, Historic Preservation Commission Rules of Procedure, Adopted May 27, 1992 SECTION 9: Issuance of a COA 9.1. Approval Stamp. Upon approval of the COA application by the Commission, the staff of the Planning Department will denote with an inked rubber stamp the approval on three of the copies of the drawings submitted with the application. The Planning Department shall keep one copy in its application file, submit one copy to the Inspections Division of the Department and return one copy to the applicant. 9.2. Approval of Modified Drawings. If changes are made to the drawings as a result of conditions on the COA stipulated by the Commission, the applicant shall submit drawings incorporating the changes to the Planning Department. If the drawings conform to the conditions imposed by the Commission, the Planning Department shall denote approval with an inked rubber stamp and distribute copies as described in Section 9.1. The applicant may not proceed under the COA until the modified drawings are approved pursuant to this section. 9.3. COA Expiration. The COA expires six (6) months after the date of issuance, or, in the case of demolition, six (6) months after the effective date of the Certificate, if the work authorized by the Certificate has not been commenced. If, after commencement, the work is discontinued for a period of six (6) months, the Certificate shall expire immediately. No work authorized by a Certificate that has expired shall be performed until a new Certificate has been . obtained. The Planning Department Staff may renew an expired Certificate if the proposed work is consistent in all respects with the application approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Where changes or modifications are proposed to the approved application, the renewal of a Certificate shall be considered as a new application. SECTION 10: Appeals of Commission Action Involving a COA 10.1. Appeals Time Limit. The Historic Preservation Commission hereby establishes that appeals to the actions of the Commission in granting or denying any COA shall be filed with the Board of Adjustment within thirty (30) days of the day of the Commission's decision. SECTION 11: Administrative Approval of COA's The following lists provide examples of the types of activities for which a Certificate of Appropriateness is and is not required and provides guidance for administrative approval of COA's. 12 County of Orange, Historic Preservation Commission Rules of Procedure,Adopted May 27, 1992 a •. ,. r� 11.1. Normal Maintenance. The Historic Preservation Commission considers the following activities to be routine maintenance of historic properties. The following activities do not require a Certificate of Appropriateness. However, other County permits may be necessary. a. Interior work. b. Painting, interior. c. Replacement of window glass and sash as long as window size, style, and material are not altered. d. Caulking and weather stripping. e. Landscape maintenance, including the removal of dead/damaged plants, provided existing healthy trees and/or shrubs are not removed or severely pruned. f. Real estate and political signs. g. Repairs to walks, patios, fences and driveways as long as replacement materials match the existing materials. h. Replacement of small amounts of missing or deteriorated siding, trim, roof shingles, porch flooring, steps, gutters and down spouts, etc., as long as the replacement materials matches the existing materials. 1.1.2. Minor Improvements. Minor improvements to structures require Certificates of Appropriateness. The following activities are considered by the Historic Preservation Commission to be minor modifications, as long as they do not have a significant impact on the exterior appearance of the historic structures. The Planning Department is responsible for issuing Certificates of Appropriateness for the following types of work: a. Installation of storm windows and doors. b. Side and rear yard fences and walls not facing a public street. c. Installation of exterior mechanical equipment such as roof fans, heat pumps, and air compressors. d. Repairs to walls, patios, fences, and driveways as long as replacement matches what presently exists. e. Foundation repairs, including vents and access doors. 13 County of Orange, Historic Preservation Commission Rules of Procedure,Adopted May 27, 1992 f. Replacement of exterior stairs, landings, and steps. g. Replacement of large amounts of missing or deteriorated siding, trim, porch floors, windows, and gutters or architectural details when there is no change in materials and design of original. h. Re-pointing and other masonry repairs. i. Exterior lighting fixtures. j. Removal of asbestos or other artificial siding. k. Signs, other than real estate and political. 1. New roof coverings using shingles from pre-approved list. m. Installation of satellite dishes. n. Exterior paint removal. 11.3. Major Modifications. Major modifications listed below require a Certificate of Appropriateness approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. These activities are examples of building alterations, site changes, new construction or demolition which require a Certificate of Appropriateness. a. Exterior changes to the primary building or other structures on the property, not included in the normal maintenance and minor improvements list. Such changes include types or styles of windows, doors, porches, decks, roofs, and lighting fixtures. b. Alterations in exterior architectural details, such as additions or changes in style of porch railings, gutters, shutters, brackets, molding, gingerbread or other decorative work. c. Removal and/or severe pruning of healthy plant materials as well as the installation of new plant material which alters the character of the site. d. The installation on any structure, of vinyl or aluminum siding or of any other siding of a different style or material than the existing siding. e. The disturbance of designated archeological sites. f. The construction of any addition to an existing structure; such as the addition of rooms, chimneys, porches, decks, ramps, solar panels, and skylights, or any new construction. 14 County of Orange, Historic Preservation Commission Rules of Procedure, Adopted May 27, 1992 The construction placement of any outbuilding on the o t e ro ert g• P Y g property, Y, including carports, garages, utility sheds, barns, silos, drying sheds, and bulk barns. h. New construction or relocation of a primary structure. i. The placement or construction of any yard fixtures such as lamp posts or other lighting fixtures, walkways, fences or walls, driveways, parking areas or the placement of any physical structure which could be considered ornamental. J. The demolition or removal of any structure, including outbuildings, yard fixtures or any part thereof. Although a Certificate of Appropriateness is required and may include a delay before a demolition permit is issued, the County cannot prohibit the demolition. k. Parking lots. 1. The installation of any permanent exterior sign measuring larger than three (3) square feet in area. ADOPTED: By unanimous vote of the Orange County Historic Preservation Commission on May 27, 1992. REVISIONS • Revised to include Rules of Procedure for processing applications for designation as Historic Landmark. 15 c r Attachment 5 Historic Preservation Commission Design Guidelines Note: Orange County has not designated any historic districts or historic landmarks due to its countywide inventory being unfinished. Only Chapel Hill Township has been completed, and an inventory of the remaining six townships is currently underway. Thus, design guidelines have not been prepared. See Attachment 6 for additional information_ Attachment 6 Areas Designated as Historic Districts or Individual Historic Properties Note: Orange County has not designated any historic districts or historic landmarks due to its countywide inventory being unfinished. Only Chapel Hill Township has been completed, and an inventory of the remaining six townships is currently underway. Measures taken to identify, protect, and promote the preservation of historic districts and properties are identified on the attached supplementary pages. DESCRIPTION OF PAST & CURRENT ACTIVITIES Since the adoption of an ordinance creating the Orange County Historic Preservation Commission on April 1, 1991, the following activities have been undertaken to identify, protect, and promote the preservation of historic districts and properties: 1. Recruitment & Appointment of Commission Members - Orange County's ordinance established a Historic Preservation Commission comprised of seven (7) members. To fill the positions on the Commission, Orange County advertised, as it normally does, in newspapers in general circulation in the county. In addition, because of the Planning Board's involvement in development of the ordinance and knowledge of persons with an interest and/or background in historic preservation, potential candidates were recommended who resided in the County's jurisdiction. As a result, five members were initially appointed to staggered terms on May 21, 1991. These five members possessed experience in the following areas: Architectural Historian/Historic Preservation Consultant Historic Preservation Contractor/Consultant Archaeologist/UNC Faculty Member Historian/Writer Landscape Architect [National Register landmark experience] The remaining two members were appointed on June 25, 1991, and September 22 , 1992 , respectively. While these members might be considered lay people in terms of historic preservation experience, one appointee was a licensed building contractor, while the other was a farmer/insurance agent. Their occupations, as well as their interest in church and/or family history, provided valuable experience within the rural context of the Commission's work. 2. Phase I - Chapel Hill Township Inventory - In January, 1991, Orange County applied for a $5, 000 grant to conduct an inventory of historic sites and structures in the unincorporated portions of Chapel Hill Township. Notice of the grant award was received in May, 1991, consultants to conduct the inventory were approved in October, 1991, and the inventory project was begun in December, 1991. The County share of the project cost includes $5, 000 in matching funds and $5, 000 in in-kind services. The project was completed in June, 1992, and, on August 26, 1992, a meeting was held with property owners, the Board of Commissioners, Planning Board, and Rural Character Study Committee for the purpose of presenting the inventory results. A copy of the final report is provided as an attachment. 3. Phase II - Inventory of Remainder of County - In January, 1992, Orange County applied for a $17, 000 grant to conduct an inventory of historic sites and structures in the remaining unincorporated portions of the county (six townships) . Notice of the grant award was received in May, 1992, consultants to conduct the inventory were approved in September, 1992 , and the inventory project was begun in October, 1992 . The County share of the project cost includes $15, 000 in matching funds and $15,000 in in-kind services. The inventory is expected to be completed by the end of July, 1993 . A copy of the contract for the Phase II project is provided as an attachment. 4. Adoption of Rules of Procedure - Rules of Procedure for the Historic Preservation Commission were adopted in two parts on April 22, 1992 and May 27, 1992, respectively (see Attachment 4) . 5. Commission Reports - As a means of "gearing up" to accomplish its role, the Historic Preservation Commission, through member, staff or visitor reports, has considered a number of topics. These topics have included: a. Orange County Archaeological Sites [September, 1991] b. Preparation of Historic Inventories [September, 1991] c. Preparation of National Register Nominations [September, 1991] d. Historic Occoneechee Mountain [October, 1991] e. Viewshed Protection [October, 1991] f. NCDOT Scenic Roads Program [December, 1991] g. Union Grove Methodist Church History [December, 1991] h. Orange County Historic Structures [December, 1991] i. Renovation of Old Chapel Hill Cemetery [January, 1992] j . Town of Hillsborough Historic Inventory [February, 1992] k. Piedmont Architecture 1775-1930 [February, 1992] 1. Changes in Building Technology [February, 1992] m. Durham Historic District Commission [March, 1992] n. Substitute Siding [May, 1992] o. Tree Topping [May, 1992] p. Archaeology in Hillsborough [July, 1992] 6. Archaeological Survey/Chapel Hill Township - In February, 1992 , the Commission approved a recommendation of the Planning Director and Vice- Chair that a Planning Intern be employed to investigate some of the sites identified as part of the Chapel Hill Township inventory, evaluate the existing record regarding prehistoric archaeological sites in the township, and, with the assistance of field school students from UNC, select one site from the architectural historians' reports for a small scale excavation. 7. Preservation Week 1992 - As part of national Preservation Week activities (May 10-16, 1992) , the Commission prepared a proclamation for the Board of Commissioners approval. The Commission also issued a press release in local newspapers concerning Preservation Week and coordinated with local reporters to have a news story (including photographs) printed about the Chapel Hill Township inventory. 8. The Trails Clubhouse - The Trails is a subdivision located in the southwestern portion of Orange County. The homeowners association would like to demolish a portion of a small historic cabin used as a clubhouse because of its poor condition. Two members of the Commission have been working with the homeowners association since July, 1992 to find alternative uses and have prepared cost estimates for repairing the cabin. 9. University Station Land Use Plan Amendment - University Station is a 620-acre planned community which was initially comprised of 1, 376 housing units and golf course development. Approximately half of the housing units were to be located in. a neo-traditional village. Although no decision has been made as yet by the Board of Commissioners regarding the project, the Historic Preservation Commission asked staff to have the architectural historians conducting the Phase II inventory to inspect the site. In addition, members of the Commission, assisted by an intern, collected information regarding the history of the site and reviewed archaeological information submitted as part of an environmental assessment. The information contained in the report to the Commission is being provided to the developer. 10. Student/Intern Projects - Each year, the Planning Department employs up to four Interns, depending upon the number of hours per week that each Intern works. Currently, one Intern is a doctoral candidate in the Archaeology program at UNC working on the project described in #6 above. Another student, a Master's Degree candidate at Duke University, is preparing a report concerning a proposed Historic Landmarks Program for the County. In addition to the Interns on staff, the Director of Preservation N.C. teaches a historic preservation class at UNC's School of City & Regional Planning. Each year, for the past two years, he has contacted the Planning Department to determine if there are projects on which his students might work. One student prepared a report for the Commission concerning the mechanics of undertaking an archaeological survey of the county. Finally, an architect-in-training contacted the Planning Department, volunteering to work up to 80 hours to satisfy a service requirement for his A.I.A. examination. The architect-in-training, using a computer print-out of structures built in Bingham Township before 1939 , surveyed each site to identify which structures existed and those that did not. The information proved useful in preparation of the Phase II inventory grant application as well as the architectural historians eventually selected to do the work. 11. Town of Hillsborough Reservoir Site - The Commission Chair corresponded with the Town of Hillsborough in June, 1992, advising the Town of the Phase II inventory. The results of the inventory were offered for use by the Town in evaluating alternative reservoir sites in the northwest portion of the county. 12. Workshop Attendance - As part its continuing education efforts and to keep abreast of current trends, Commission members as well as Staff have attended a number of workshops and/or conferences. Among them have been the following: - 46th National Preservation Conference - Historic Preservation Commission Workshop - Certified Local Government Workshop - Historic Preservation Foundation of N.C. Workshop CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP SURVEY FINAL REPORT Kelly A. Lally and M. Ruth Little, Principal Investigators June 1992 Methodology The architectural survey of Chapel Hill Township is the first phase of the Orange County survey. The remaining six townships in the county will be surveyed in 1992-1993. The town of Carrboro was surveyed in 1980; Chapel Hill is cur- rently being surveyed. Kelly A. Lally and M. Ruth Little served as Principal Investigators for the survey. Kelly Lally has an MA in Folk Studies and conducted the survey of historic resources in Wake County from 1988 to 1991 . M. Ruth Little of Longleaf His- toric Resources has a Ph.D. in Art History and served as National Register Coor- dinator and later as Survey Coordinator in the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office from 1986 to December 1989. Fieldwork was conducted from December 1991 to April 1992. The consultants spent sixteen days in the field and drove 1945 miles commuting from Raleigh to the survey area and driving area roads. Using USGS quadrangles as field maps, Lally and Little drove every accessible road and field-checked every older build- ing coded on the quad maps outside the city limits of Carrboro and Chapel Hill to identify and document historic properties over fifty years old. 160 properties were recorded in detail, while other badly deteriorated, heavily altered, or ex- tremely common resources were map-coded according to the State Historic Preservation Office's map-code typology. Resources were evaluated by the Principal Investigators and the State Historic Preservation Office staff for Nation- al Register eligibility using the Secretary of Interior's criteria. Properties were documented with computer forms, black and white photog- raphs, and occasionally color slides; each property received a state survey num- ber and was marked on the appropriate USGS map and aerial photo map of Orange County. In the index and on the computer forms properties were de- scribed geographically according to their locations on the field maps; street ad- dresses were recorded when available. In addition, oral history information was gathered from residents and local people when possible. All original survey files and maps will be stored in the Survey and Planning Branch of the State Division of Archives and History. Copies of the files will go to the Orange County Plan- ning Department. Character of Resources The landscape of Chapel Hill Township is often strikingly beautiful because of the steep, rocky terrain. The township is rapidly suburbanizing as new roads • are cut into the woods and new houses are built, however, the effect is not as detrimental as in many other suburban areas because many of the new develop- ments respect the terrain and many of the lots are large. Although this report is based on visual evidence and oral history, a summary of the historical composition of the county drawn from secondary sources is help- ful in evaluating visual and oral evidence.1 Orange County in the 1850s was a county containing an extremely stable population of settlers who had emigrated into the area in the 18th century. They were largely Scotch-Irish and Germans who emigrated from Pennsylvania and English settlers who had emigrated from Virginia. The county was typical of the upland South, with a population com- posed largely of yeoman farming families. In 1860, 59% of the white male heads of households owned no land, and 71 .5% of them owned no slaves. Thirty-three percent of the white male household heads owned between one and 250 acres and 21 .6% owned between one and nine slaves. Kinship was more important than class in Orange County, for succeeding generations settled adjacent to each other in ever growing neighborhoods that were extremely stable. By the 1850s the county was extensively but thinly settled, with one family for each 200 acres of land. In reality, families lived closer than this, along creeks and rivers and in neighborhood clusters. The initial reconaissance survey of Chapel Hill Township revealed very few his- toric buildings, for we were driving the paved county roads, and few historic houses stood on these roads. We were therefore surprised to find that there were many more early buildings standing in the township than we had ex- pected. These buildings were located on dirt roads, often one quarter to one- half mile from the present road. We discovered that, prior to the early twentieth century, farms in the township were linked by dirt paths that zigzagged from one farm to another. In the early twentieth century the public roads were laid out in more or less straight orientations between the rows of farms, leaving the farmhouses sitting well-back from the new roads on long dirt driveways. Another surprising discovery about the historic buildings of the township is that almost one-third of the pre-1940 buildings are one-room log houses built be- tween ca. 1810 and ca. 1905. This is a higher incidence of log building than we expected. Fewer antebellum frame buildings were found than we expected. The township was apparently composed primarily of small subsistence farms throughout the nineteenth century. The farmers built their houses out of avail- able materials, with the help of neighbors. Perhaps most remarkable is the fact that most of these log houses are still principal residences, although they have been enlarged either by adding wings to the log core or by adding a frame front addition and turning the log house into the rear ell. In the neighboring counties of Durham and Caswell, log houses are generally no longer used for residential purposes and are either converted to outbuildings or simply abandoned. By contrast, Orange County citizens preserve and often cherish their log homesteads. Several reasons appear to explain this grass-roots preservation ethic. Many of the current owners are highly educated individuals drawn to Orange County through the university communities, and they have a special appreciation for historic craftsmanship. Another reason is that the large student population creates a high demand for rental housing, and students are often happy to live in a deteriorated log dwelling which has a picturesque set- ting and cheap rent. Yet another segment of the population living in log homesteads are descendants of the farmers who built the houses, and they preserve the log houses as part of their family history. Much family folklore is associated with the old log homeplace, and although the children and grand- children may have built newer houses next door, they cannot bear to tear down the old house. Most of the log homesteads in Chapel Hill Township have undergone so much change in the process of making them larger and bringing them into conforma- tion with current housing standards that they no longer retain the architectural integrity necessary for National Register eligibility. It is difficult to enlarge a one-room log house without destroying its integrity of form. Although this house type is statistically the most common type in the survey, only one [OR 425: Neville House] of the properties recommended for the National Register Study List as a result of the survey belongs to the type. Most of the eligible farm complexes have log outbuildings. The kitchen of the Sam Couch Farm [OR 470], one of the eligible farms, was originally a log dwelling. The purpose of this report is not to recommend preservation strategies to the Orange County planning department, but several observations may not be out of order. Private sector preservation is perhaps more successful in Chapel Hill Township than in any other area of North Carolina. Very few of the historic properties surveyed were unoccupied or endangered. Most were occupied or at least in use by owners or occupants who appeared to value the architectural character of the buildings. One of the most effective preservation strategies might be the publication of a guide to Orange County's historic architecture that celebrates the humble log homestead as well as the more obvious larger and stylish historic landmarks. Another strategy might be to investigate how well the current building code works in assisting the rehabilitation of historic build- ings, especially of log buildings. Farm Complexes Until recently, the economy in Chapel Hill Township was agriculturally based like the rest of Orange County. Despite increased residential and commercial devel- opment around Carrboro and Chapel Hill, a number of farm complexes survive in the township--some still in use for farming purposes. Fifty-five sizeable farm complexes were documented in Chapel Hill Township, while most of the remain- ing properties had at least one surviving outbuilding. Farmsteads are usually comprised of the main farm dwelling and groups of domestic and agricultural outbuildings, as well as any landscape features or acreage that accompany them, such as trees, gardens, cultivated fields, woodlands, ponds, farm roads, and fences. Cotton and corn were the principal crops grown in Chapel Hill Township, which predominantly has White Store Fine Sandy Loam soil that is not very favorable for tobacco cultivation.2 Thus, very few of the distinctive tobacco-curing barns that are found in much of the North Carolina piedmont are found in Chapel Hill Township. Most of those that do exist, such as the two log barns on the Will Mayse Farm [OR 483] are found near the edges of the township and built of log construction. After the boll weevil inhibited cotton production in the 1920s, many area farmers turned to dairy farming. Outbuildings The majority of outbuildings in Chapel Hill Township are of log construction, put together with half-dovetail or V-notches, although frame outbuildings became somewhat more common in the twentieth century. Most outbuildings are simple rectangular, gable or shed-roofed structures that serve specialized pur- poses, often identifiable only by people familiar with them. A number of out- building types were found consistently on farms. Dairy farm buildings will be treated separately. A. Smokehouses The smokehouse, where meat was cured and stored, is the most common domestic outbuilding. The smokehouse on the William F. Cole Farm [OR 373] exemplifes the smokehouses in the township: a small, gable-front, log structure with half-dovetail notches, a batten front door, and a slightly overhanging front gable. B. Kitchens 4 Although many detached kitchens were undoubtedly torn down or attached to main houses in the twentieth century, a high number of these important domestic outbuildings survive. They are generally quite similar to the small houses many. people inhabited: one-room buildings with gable-roofs and large stone chimneys. Some, such as the the 18' by 25' log kitchen on the William Couch Farm [OR 4711, actually were dwellings originally--used as kitchens when new houses were built. C. Wells and Wellhouses Stone-lined wells with wooden or brick enclosures, often capped with an open gable or hip-roofed shelter, were found on most farms in close proximity to the main house. The John Joseph Whitfield Farm [OR 484] has a gable-roofed wellhouse with the well in front and an enclosed storage closet behind it. D. Barns Barns for storing hay and livestock were quite common on all farms. There are two main types of barns: gable-front and side-gable. Both have the same rec- tangular shape. Side-gable barns are always constructed of log and have entrances in the flanks and rectangular horizontal openings in one or both of the gable ends, where hay or feed could pass through. With the exception of the feed openings in the gable ends, these barns closely resemble the standard one= room log house in the township and appear to be the earliest surviving barn type in the township. The side-gable barn on the Lloyd Farm [OR 392] is a good example. It has half-dovetail notches and appears to date from the mid- nineteenth century. Gable-front barns are either of log or frame construction and have entrances in the gable ends. An example of a. gable-front log barn is found at the Vance Daniel Farm [OR 3741 E. Corn Cribs and Granaries Well-ventilated rectangular cribs of loosely fit logs for storing corn were stan- dard outbuildings on nearly every farm. Granaries for storing harvested grain were found on several farms, including the Sam Couch Farm [WA 470], al- though they are difficult to identify because they look like many other farm buildings, one-story boxes with gable roofs and a door in the gable end. The granary on the Lindsey-Wilson Farm does vary from this pattern. Two-stories tall with doors at both levels, the building resembles a tobacco packhouse. In- side, wooden bins that held the grain survive. F. Cotton Houses • Cotton was the main cash crop on Chapel Hill Township farms, and some farms had special storage buildings for the harvested crop. Like granaries, however, cotton houses documented in Chapel Hill Township greatly resemble other farm buildings from the exterior. The cotton house on the Sidney W. Crabtree Farm [OR 366] stands next to the farm's smokehouse. They are nearly identical: both are small, gable-front frame structures with gable-end doors. Other outbuildings documented in smaller numbers in the township include dairies, chicken houses, wagon shelters, wash houses, potato houses, privies, and a few tobacco barns. Arrangement of Farm Buildings Outbuildings are generally clustered behind the farmhouse, with domestic build- ings, such as kitchens and smokehouses, placed conveniently close to the main house and agricultural buildings usually located a slight distance away. There are no universal arrangements, although outbuildings are generally lined up in several short rows behind or beside the farm house or placed in a rectangle, forming a courtyard of sorts. Other times buildings are placed in seemingly ran- dom clusters. Three Chapel Hill Township farmsteads represent the wide variety of farmyard arrangements. The Henry Lloyd House [OR 440] off Old Fayetteville Road faces six outbuildings and a garden plot forming a rectangular farmyard across a dirt road that once served as the road to Fayetteville. Included in the compound are a log hay barn, frame stable, log sheep barn, log corn crib, and a frame cotton house. The log barns all have v-notches. The whetstone, which sharpened tools and farming implements, is still located at one end of the yard--an ex- tremely rare survival. The smokehouse and well are characteristically located next to the house. The Lindsey-Wilson Farm contains a full complement of log and frame outbuild- ings dating from the mid-nineteenth century to the early twentieth century. The collection includes a V-notched log kitchen with massive stone rubble chimney, a half-dovetail smokehouse, v-notched hay barn, and a two-story frame granary, all of which appear to be of nineteenth century vintage. The smokehouse, kitchen, well, milkhouse, and chicken houses are located in the yard behind the house, while the farm buildings, such as the granary, corn crib, hay barn, and milking barn are found in the side yard several -hundred feet from the domestic complex. The Lloyd Farm [OR 392] in the western section of the township shows an un- usual arrangement: all five mid-to-late nineteenth century outbuildings are lined up with the farmhouse in one straight horizontal row. The house is again sepa- rated-from the agricultural buildings by several hundred feet. The farm buildings are closely-spaced and include a frame garage, frame tobacco packhouse, log corn crib with board and batten exterior walls, a v-notched log mule stable, and the typical local hay barn, built of logs joined with half-dovetail notches with a v-notched log side additon. These buildings face a concrete block milking barn added in the 1950s. Dairy Farms Many Chapel Hill Township farmers turned from cotton production to dairy farming from the 1920s to the 1950s. Dairy farms required specialized out- buildings, including large cow barns,milking barns, milk cooling facilities, .hay barns, and feed silos in addition to the standard domestic farm buildings. Most of the the dairy buildings in Orange County were probably built according to plans and specifications provided by the Agricultural Extension Service or North Carolina State University. The Bryant Nevilles Farm aptly illustrates the transition of many small farm- steads to dairy farms. The Nevilles farm retains its original 1860s log homestead and smokehouse, but these traditional buildings are surrounded by a modern 1920s bungalow and dairy farm buildings added by Bryant's son, Jesse, and his grandson, Lacy, from the 1920s to the 1950s. Among these later build- ings are a 1924 gable-roofed cow barn; a 1925 frame milking barn, which still retains milking machinery; a frame hay barn; a 1950s concrete block milk cool- ing house; and two 1950s silos. Other area dairy farms, such as the Doc McClennan Farm [OR 382] display the large, picturesque gambrel-roofed frame barns typically associated with dairy farms. Antebellum Frame Houses Seven frame houses of antebellum date stand in Chapel Hill Township. These are as follows: OR 365:Smith-Cole House, 1845. 2-story center passage OR 431 :Lloyd-Rogers House: 1850s 2-story center passage OR 435: John Kirkland House: 1850s? 2-story side-hall OR 470: Sam Couch Farm: ca. 1848 hall-and-parlor 2-story OR 347: Williams House: 1850s? hall-and-parlor 1 1/2 story OR 491 :Patterson House: 1830s? 2-story center passage OR 400: Smyth House: 1850s? Gk. Rev, hall-and-parlor Five retain some degree of antebellum integrity, but the Lloyd-Rogers House and the Patterson House have undergone a great deal of alteration. Three of the group, the Smith-Cole House, the Lloyd-Rogers House, and the Patterson House, are two-story center passage houses that symbolize the grand plantation house in scale and design. The Sam Couch House is a more compact two-story hall-and-parlor house, and the Williams House is a 1 1/2 story hall-and-parlor house. Rather than assuming that the township had a number of plantation houses that have been demolished, it is more likely that there were very few antebellum farmers that had sufficient cash to construct a fine frame house. Production of a frame house would have been far more labor-intensive than the erection of a log house, which was a community undertaking utilizing tree trunks. The two best-preserved antebellum frame houses in the township are the Smith- Cole House and the Sam Couch House. The Smith-Cole House on Smith Level Road was the seat of a huge plantation owned by three Smith siblings who were raised in Hillsborough. One brother was a doctor, one a lawyer, and the sister kept house. The house, built in 1845, stands virtually unaltered. It is a double pile Federal style house, a conservative design for the 1840s when the Greek Revival style was in vogue. The exterior has high quality and stylish though dated features. It is one of the few early houses in the township with chimneys constructed completely of brick, instead primarily of fieldstone. It has molded cornice boards, raking cornices with pattern boards, and original porch classical style porch posts. The interior is surprisingly bare and simple, with plaster walls, a simple wainscot in the hall, extremely simple Greek Revival style mantels and a boxy stair. It appears that the interior was finished off some years after the house was built, and perhaps not as finely as had originally been intended. The Sam Couch House was built about 1848 and is a single-pile hall-and-parlor house, therefore considerably smaller and less architecturally pretentious than the Smith-Cole House. It also has a one-story shed porch across the front, and its exterior end chimneys are constructed completely of brick. The front and rear windows have Greek Revival style cornerblock surrounds, found on only one other house in the township, the Smyth House. The interior has wood sheathed walls, simple Greek Revival mantels and doors, and an enclosed corner stair rising from the hall to the second floor bedrooms. The Lloyd-Rogers House is a substantial single-pile, center passage house that has lost its integrity due to twentieth century alterations. It retains one unique feature for the township in that it is built on a raised brick basement. Root cel- lars are a common feature beneath log and frame houses in the township, but this is the only house with a raised basement. The Patterson House is a double-pile, center passage antebellum house built by a family that owned vast acreage as well as the now demolished Patterson Grist Mill, but Colonial Revival renovations, probably in the 1920s or later, have obscured the original design of the house. The tripartite Federal style mantels may be original, but it is likely that the Adamesque trim and arched niches flank- ing the fireplace in the parlor are Colonial Revival. The Log House Approximately fifty, almost one-third, of the 160 recorded properties in the township are log houses. This high percentage is surprising, but even more sur- prising is the fact that, with the exception of several Craftsman style log houses of the 1920s-1930s, all of these are the same house form: one-room with a loft. This house type has a side gable roof, a gable end chimney of fieldstone with a brick stack, and a front and rear door. The logs are square-hewn, notched at the corners, most often with V-notching, but sometimes with half- dovetail or diamond notching. The interior generally has an enclosed corner stair to the loft. In several of the smaller log houses, there is a ladder stair to the loft. The exterior log walls are sometimes weatherboarded, but surprisingly often have remained uncovered. There is always a front and rear door, and al- most always several windows, usually with 6/6 sash or 4/4 double-hung sash. The smallest log house that was measured is 13 1/2 by 17 1/2 feet [OR 389: Reeves House] and the largest measured is 20'8" by 24 ' 7" [OR 434 Sam & Laura Nunn House]. The earliest construction date that can be documented is the 1827 date carved into the chimney of the Craig-Strayhorn-Blackwood House [OR 457], although the Craig-Blackwood House [OR 452] is said to have been built in 1811 . The latest documented log house is the Sam and Laura Nunn House, built about 1905, although OR 404 is a sawn log house that appears to have been built in the 1920s or 1930s. A group of houses have oral history that associates their construction with the time of the Civil War. For exammple, William Shambley built his log house [OR 466] about 1860 just before leaving for the war; Bryant Nevilles built his log house [OR 386] during the war. It is difficult to date these log houses by physical examination, for there are seldom any stylistic features that would indicate a construction date, and the types of saw marks in the sawn lumber and the technology of the nails that would indicate construction date are often difficult to find beneath layers of recent materials. One construction feature that seems to be a general indicator of age is chimney size. In general, the earlier the construction date, the larger the chimney. The Neville House [OR 425] is a particularly significant log house because not only is it well-preserved on the exterior, but it retains a Federal style mantel on the interior that is probably original. The high number of standardized log houses suggests several things about Orange County during the nineteenth century. It appears to have been a county dominated by small farms. Although the ethnic background of the settlers may not have been homogeneous, there must have been a good deal of community involvement in log house construction, since the same house type occurs over and over. Just to the north, in Caswell County, log houses were built in several different forms, from the single pen to the double pen to the saddlebag and the dogtrot. But here in the Chapel Hill township of Orange County not a single ex- ample of any other traditional type than the single pen log house was recorded. There are just two 2-story single-pen log houses recorded in the township, and all of the rest are one and one-half stories.. Two or three informants spoke quite specifically about the method of construc- tion of these log houses. Each of these long-time Orange County residents re- membered that log houses were built by four men, one standing at each corner to fit the logs into place. Annabel Lloyd, the daughter of Sam Nunn, who built the most recently documented log house, even remembers the names of two of the three builders. She recalled that her father and three local men (Monroe Partin, Green Johnson, and a third man whom she cannot recall) built their 2- story log house about 1905. [Sam & Laura Nunn House, Or 4341 It is logical that all of the houses would look alike if they were all being built by the com- munity. When questioned as to why there were so many log houses in the area, people invariably replied that there weren't any nearby saw mills, and fur- thermore, that milled lumber was expensive. Schools and Churches Three frame early twentieth century schoolhouses were recorded in the township: OR 368: former Smith Level School OR 384: former Damascus Church School OR 493: former Hickory Grove School. All of these are one or*one and one-half story front gable buildings, and all have been converted to houses and have lost much of their integrity. Hickory Grove School was built to serve the black community west of Carrboro, the other two were built for white communities. The most significant historic school standing in the township is the former Mur- phy School [OR 467] on Old NC 10 southeast of Hillsborough. It was built in the 1920s as part of the school modernization and consolidation movement throughout the state. It is a large, one-story brick building with lots of big windows and a stylish hip roof. A few years after construction, a brick auditorium with a Doric portico was added to the west end of the school. Be- hind the school is a large frame bungalow that may have been built as a teacherage, for the six or eight teachers who staffed this school would have needed somewhere to room and board. If this was a teacherage, it is an un- usual survival, for few teacherages in North Carolina are still standing. Four historic churches were recorded in the township. The two oldest church buildings are the Bethel Baptist Church [OR 405] and the Damascus Congrega- tional Christian Church [OR 383], both built about 1900. Both are of frame con- struction and Gothic Revival styling. Both churches have been covered with artificial siding in recent years and have lost some of their architectural integrity. Bethel Church has a picturesque pyramidal-roofed tower located beside its main front-gable block. Union Grove Methodist Church [OR 492] is also Gothic Revival in style, but is a stone building constructed in 1946. Neville Chapel United Church of Christ [OR 402] is a small, front-gable frame building constructed in the early twentieth century for a black congregation known as Strowd Grove Church but has been considerably altered in recent years. None of the historic church cemeteries that were recorded have graves with death dates earlier than the 1860s. It seems that residents utilized family graveyards on the farms until after the Civil War. The most interesting early gravestones are at New Hope Presbyterian Church Cemetery [OR 458]. The earliest gravemarker is a crude native stone headstone for infant Vernon Craig, who died in 1868. His stone notes that his was "the first grave in this ground." The stylish marble headstone of David K. Blackwood, who died in 1859, notes that he was reinterred at New Hope in 1912 from the family burying ground. Very few family burying grounds were found. These must have had homemade fieldstone markers and must not have been well-maintained. Stylish Late 19th and Early 20th Century Farmhouses Until the early twentieth century, farmhouses in Chapel Hill township are of vernacular design, and belong to one of three types: the one-room log house, the one-story frame single-pile, side-gable house, or the 2-story frame single- pile, side-gable house (often known as the I-house). The majority of these houses are plain, vernacular houses that use locally available materials and have no stylish ornament. The Herbert McCauley House [OR 391], Vance Daniel House [OR 374], and Matthew Strowd House [OR 441] are the best-preserved examples of farm- houses constructed after the recovery from the Civil War, in the 1870s to 1890s, by upper middle-class farmers. Each is a substantial frame I-house with a double-leaf front door and a stylish front porch. These houses mark the height of development of the vernacular farmhouse in the late nineteenth century. These center passage, single-pile houses with open-string staircases represent a complete break from the one-room log house in which the majority of farm families lived. By the 1890s, more elaborate store-bought millwork began to be used on doors, windows, and porches. Two vernacular farmhouses stand out because of their lavish use of store-bought millwork. Perhaps the most fashionable house is the Cole House [Or 371], built about 1900, presumably by William Cole for his daughter when she married. The L-plan farmhouse has a front-gabled wing with a bay window with pendanted eaves, an L-shaped front porch with sawnwork brackets and a drip course, and cross-gables with imbricated wood shingles and diamond-shaped ventilators. The Pritchard-Poythress House [OR 375] was built in the 1890s for grist mill owner Pritchard, and is an I-house with a front cross- gable, a fashionably bracketted front porch, and a side bay window with pendanted eaves. Another stylish feature is the construction of the chimneys, which are of brick rather than the usual fieldstone. About 1910 three different affluent farmhouse types appear in the township: the pyramidal cottage, the two-story foursquare, and the bungalow. Charlie and Sophie Minor, a black farming couple, had a pyramidal cottage [OR 388] built on their farm about 1910. It has the high hipped roof, tall interior chim- neys, and front cross gable that characterize this popular house type. Claude and Ola Neville had their two-story frame foursquare farmhouse [OR 385] built in the 1920s. Claude was a prosperous farmer who supplemented his income with a grocery store in Carrboro. Around 1918 Brodie Lloyd had a spacious bungalow [OR 446] constructed for himself. He was an affluent farmer who supplemented his income with a lumber company in Carrboro. His house is one of the largest and best-preserved bungalows in the township. NOTES _ 1 This summary is drawn from Kinship and Neighborhood in a Southern Com- munity: Orange County, North Carolina 1849-1881, by Robert C. Kenzer. (Knox- ville: University of Tennessee Press, 1987). 2 Kenzer, 34. ANNOTATED INDEX CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP SURVEY Kelly Lally and Ruth Little, 1991-1992 OR 335 Dubose Tenant Farm Complex: late 19th century N. side NC 54 Bus. 0.4 mi W. of Durham County line Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad Abandoned late 19th century log house with frame additions, frame and log outbuildings. Tenant farm for Dubose estate. OR 336 Dubose Tenant Farm Complex: 1930s 0.3 mi N. of NC 54 Bus. on farm road just W. of Durham County line Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad 1930s Colonial Revival tenant house with outbuildings, built for Dubose estate. OR 337 Dubose Tenant House: ca. 1910 0.4 mi N. of NC 54 Bus. on farm road just W. of Durham County line Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad Ca. 1910 frame house was tenant dwelling on Dubose estate. OR 338 Dubose Tenant House: 1930s • S. side NC 54 Bus. just W. of Durham County line Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad 1930s Colonial Revival tenant house, built for Dubose estate. OR 339 Dubose Tenant House: 1930s N. side NC 54 Bus 0.1 mi W. of Durham County line Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad 1930s Colonial Revival tenant house, frame and log outbuildings, built for Dubose estate. OR 340 House: late 19th century 0.5 mi E. of Mt. Carmel Church Rd (SR 1008) on farm rd, N. of Chatham County line Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Farrington Quad Typical, but much altered late 19th century log house. Log tobacco barn. Its early history is unknown. OR 341 House: S. side Mt. Carmel Church Rd (SR 1008) 0.4 mi SE of Clearwater Lake Rd (SR 1918) Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Farrington Quad Typical, but somewhat altered late 19th century log house. It's early history is unknown. OR 342 House: early 20th century NE side SR 1008, 0.2 mi SE of SR 1918 1717 Mt. Carmel Church Rd Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Farrington Quad Early 20th century frame I-house, altered. It's early history is unknown. OR 343 Blackwood-Sparrow Farm: early 20th century 0.1 mi NW of SR 1918 on farm road 1533 Clearwater Lake Rd Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Farrington Quad Much altered 2-story farmhouse and good collection of log outbuildings. Originally owned by the Blackwood family but owned by the Sparrow family since the 1920s. OR 344 Houses: 1920s Mt. Carmel Church Rd (SR 1008) just SE of Clearwater Lake Rd (SR 1918) Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Farrington Quad Two remodeled 1920s bungalows may have been related in some way. Their early history is unknown. OR 345 Houses: late 19th century, early 20th century 0.3 mi W. of Mt. Cannel Church Rd (SR 1008) on farm road Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Farrington Quad Late 19th century log house converted to a farm building located near a remodeled early 20th century frame saddlebag house. It's early history is unknown. OR 346 Blackwood Brothers Dairy Farm: early 20th century NE side SR 1008, 0.2 mi NW of SR 1918 1422 Mt. Cannel Church Rd Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Farrington Quad Well-preserved 1 1/2-story farmhouse and intact collection of log and frame domestic and dairy farm buildings owned by the Blackwood family since the early 20th century. OR 347 Williams Farm: mid-19th century SW side SR 1008, 0.3 mi NW of SR 1918 1300 Mt. Cannel Church Rd Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Farrington Quad The Williams Farm comprises an antebellum frame hall-and-parlor house and two log domestic outbuildings of the same vintage, all altered; two log tenant houses; and several twentieth century frame farm buildings and sheds. This 38 1/2 acre farm has been in the Williams family since 1935, although most of the buildings on the farm were built many years before they acquired the property. OR 348 Sparrow and Mt. Cannel Church Cemetery: late 19th century N. side Parker Rd (SR 1916) just NW of Mt. Cannel Church Rd (SR 1008) Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad Large community and church cemetery with graves dating from late 19th century to present marked mostly with manufactured markers. OR 349 Geodetic Dome House: 1970s SW side Mt. Carmel Church Rd (SR 1008) just NW of Parker Rd (SR 1916) Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad 1970s geodetic dome with a metal frame and fiberglass exterior walls. OR 350 Rich House: mid-19th-early 20th century. SW side SR 1008, 0.1 mi NW of SR 1916 1017 Mt. Cannel Church Rd Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad Somewhat remodeled early 20th cent. 1 1/2 story triple-A farmhouse has a mid-19th century rear ell said to have been owned by the Rich family for many years. OR 351 Carey House (?): 1920s NE side SR 1008, 0.2 mi SE of SR 1915 806 Mt. Cannel Church Rd Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad Typical 1920s frame bungalow. It's early history is unknown. OR 352 Oldham House (?): early 20th century SW side SR 1008, 0.2 mi SE of SR 1915 723 Mt. Carmel Church Rd Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad Much remodeled early 20th century two-story L-shaped farmhouse with dormer windows and one simple pointed Gothic Revival window. It's early history is unknown. OR 353 Pendergraft House: 1920s E. side Old Lystra Rd (SR 1915) just N. of Chatham County line Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Farrington Quad Typical 1920s bungalow. It's early history is unknown. OR 354 Wombles-Pendergraft House: turn of the century Jct Old Lystra Rd (SR 1915) & White Rock Church Rd (SR 1914) Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Farrington Quad Much remodeled one-story turn of the century triple-A, owned by the Pendergraft family for many years; earlier owned by Early Wombles. OR 355 House: mid-19th century (?) 0.1 mi S. of Old Lystra Rd (SR 1915) just E. of White Rock Church Rd (SR 1914) Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Farrington Quad Deteriorated but typical mid-19th century (?) log house with large stone chimney and kitchen attached by breezeway. It's early history is unknown. OR 356 Emily Sparrow House: ca. 1900 End of dirt lane, W side SR 1915 .2 mi. N of White Rock Church Rd. 600 block Homeplace Drive Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Farrington Quad Typical one-story Triple-A farmhouse, with extensive additions and one log and one frame outbuilding, built for Sparrow family. OR 357 Sparrow Farm: ca. 1900 E side SR 1915 .5 mi. N of White Rock Church Rd. 1224 Old Lystra Road Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Farrington Quad Typical two-story frame I-house, said to have been built around a smaller antebellum house. House has been in the Sparrow family since the beginning. OR 358 Canter House: 1920s Located in the fork of SR 1915 (Old Lystra) & SR 1008 (Mt. Carmel Church roads) Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Typical frame bungalow with two contemporary outbuildings. Its early history is not known. OR 359 House: 1930s NW side US 15-501 .1 mi. N of jct. w/ SR 1919 Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Farrington Quad Tiny frame Craftsman house probably built in the 1930s soon after the con- struction of US 15-501 between Chapel Hill and Pittsboro. OR 360 Allen Johnson House: early 20th century W side US 15-501 .5 mi. N of jct w/ SR 1919 Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Farrington Quad Frame pyramidal cottage with front dormer, replacement front porch; no early outbuildings. Original history unknown. OR 361 Houses: 1930s Both sides US 15-501 .2 mi. S of jct. w/ SR 1962 Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Farrington Quad Four frame, Craftsman style houses clustered close to US 15-501; all are vernacular side-gable forms with front dormer windows. OR 362 Houses: ca. 1915, ca. 1925 SE side US 15-501 .1 mi. S of jct. w/ SR 1962 Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Farrington Quad Two adjacent houses: northern house is ca. 1915 frame pyramidal cottage, well-preserved; southern house is ca. 1925 side-gable, Craftsman style frame house. OR 363 House: ca. 1930 E side US 15-501 .1 mi. N of jct. w/ SR 1962 Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Spacious Craftsman style log house built of round, saddle-notched logs with diagonally patterned log gable ends and exterior end fieldstone chimney with handsome stone fireplace; notable fieldstone terracing in rear yard. OR 364 Farm: ca. 1900 E side US 15-501 .2 mi. S of jct. w/ SR 1008 Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Frame truncated 2-story farmhouse with Triple A roofline and three early out- buildings; early history is unknown. OR 365 Smith-Cole House: 1845 W side SR 1919 .3 mi. N of jct w/ US 15-501 1430 Smith Level Road Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad This 2-story frame, double pile Federal style plantation house is the largest antebellum house in the township and has great architectural significance. It was the seat of the large Smith family plantation until the 1880s, when it was bought by William Cole. The virtually unaltered house and the 130 remaining acres appear to be eligible for the National Register. OR 366 Sidney W. Crabtree Farm E side SR 1919 .1 mi. S of jct. w/ SR 1920 1301 Smith Level Road: Chapel Hill vicinity, Orange County Farrington Quad Fifty-four acre farm established in 1903 out of portion of the nearby Smith Plantation; one-story frame Triple-A farmhouse is fairly well-preserved and six early log and frame outbuildings form a significant barnyard to the rear. Graveyard believed to be that of the Smith Plantation slaves. OR 367 Wm. Clarence Cole Farm: ca. 1920 W side SR 1919 .5 mi. S of jct w/ SR 1962 _ 1144 Smith Level Road: Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Frame, Craftsman style farmhouse with side-gable roof and front dormer built by William Clarence Cole on property subdivided from the nearby Smith Plantation; four early outbuildings. OR 368 (former) Smith Level School: ca. 1910 W side Smith Level Road .1 mi. S of jct w/ SR 1939 Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Frame, 1 1/2 story, front-gable rural school converted to house in 1930s, there- by compromising integrity. OR 369 Womble? Farm: early 20th century S side Damascus Church Rd. (SR 1939), .2 mi. W of jct. w/ SR 1919 Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Typical frame 1-story Triple-A farmhouse with considerable alteration; early his- tory unknown. OR 370 Bill Crabtree Farm: 1872 and ca. 1900 SE side SR 1939 .3 mi. E of jct w/ SR 1940 2013 Damascus Church Road Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Farrington Quad Circa 1872 log homestead is now rear ell of ca. 1900 frame I-house with stylish original trim; built for grandfather of Bill Crabtree; 1 early outbuilding. OR 371 Cole Farm: ca. 1900 E side SR 1919 .5 mi. N of jct w/ SR 1939 - 753 Smith Level Road Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad One of most stylish farmhouses in township, this 1-story frame L-plan house is loaded with millwork ornament; said to have been built by William Cole for his daughter. Numerous outbuildings. OR 372 Womble Farm: ca. 1910 S side SR 1938 .2 mi. W of jct w/ SR 1919 301 Ray Road Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Typical 1-story frame Triple-A farmhouse with 4 early outbuildings, said to have been farm of Womble family for many years. OR 373 Wm. F. Cole Farm: 1920s E side SR 1919 at jct. w/ SR 1939 827 Smith Level Road Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad William F. Cole probably built the side-gable log barn and log smokehouse in 19th century, although the farmhouse, a typical frame bungalow, dates from 1920s. OR 374 Vance Daniel Farm: ca. 1892 S side SR 1939 .2 mi. E of jct w/ SR 1940 1611 Damascus Church Road Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Farrington Quad Well-preserved frame I-house with three early log outbuildings built for cotton and corn farmer Vance Daniel. OR 375 Pritchard-Poythress Farm: 1890s S side SR 1939 .2 mi. E of jct w/ SR 1940 1500 block Damascus Church Road Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Farrington Quad Stylish frame I-house built for owner of nearby Pritchard Mill; retains detached kitchen and numerous other log and frame outbuildings. OR 376 Pritchard Mill Miller's House: ca. 1890 W side SR 1940 .05 mi. N of jct. w/ SR '1939 1400 block Damascus Church Road Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Farrington Quad Only known miller's house in township; sits on knoll above mill site. Small frame I-house with early log barn. OR 377 Lindsey-Wilson Farm: mid-19th century SW side SR 1940 .4 mi. S of jct w/ SR 2047 815 Damascus Church Road Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Farrington Quad Significant mid-19th century farmstead with log kitchen, smokehouse, hay barn and frame granary, log farmhouse has substantial alterations. Section of the old roadbed, with stone "fence," survives in front yard. OR 378 House: Late 19th century? SW side SR 1008 .5 mi. N of SR 1918 1400 block Mt. Carmel Church Road Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Farrington Quad Typical one-room log house, much-altered, with log barn; early history un- known. OR 379 Miss Annie Pickard House: Late 19th century? S side Jones Ferry Road (SR 1942) .5 mi. E of jct w/ SR 1948) Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Bynum Quad Typical one-room log house with unusual addition of a Triple-A roofline, integrity now gone. Lived in by Miss Annie Pickard for many years. OR 380 Long Farm: 1890s? S side SR 1942 .5 mi. SW of jct w/ SR 1946 2912 Jones Ferry Road Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County White Cross Quad One-story frame, side-gable farmhouse with substantial additions; one log barn and one frame barn; said to have been by Long family. OR 381 H. A. Bowden Farm: ca. 1928 N side SR 1946 .4 mi. W of jct w/ SR 1942 400 block Bowden Road Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County White Cross Quad Typical frame bungalow with 3 contemporary frame outbuildings built for Henry A. Bowden, a cotton and tobacco farmer. OR 382 Doc McClenan Farm: ca,. 1860? S side SR 1005 .05 mi. E of jct w/ SR 1946 1818 Old Greensboro Road Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County White Cross Quad Log homestead submerged in 2-story frame Triple A farmhouse; huge gambrel- roofed dairy barn built in 1930 is one of the finest of the type. Owned by McClenan family since beginning. OR 383 • Damascus Congregational Christian Church: ca. 1900 E side Damascus Church Road (SR 1940) .2 mi. S of jct w/ SR 2047 Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Frame Gothic Revival style church whose integrity is compromised by un- sympathetic vinyl siding; large cemetery with earliest graves in 1870s. OR 384 (former) Damascus Church School: early 20th century N side SR 1942 at jct. w/ SR 1940 2323 Jones Ferry Road Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County White Cross or Chapel Hill Quad Modest 1-story frame, front gable rural schoolhouse converted in 1930s to a house and integrity thereby compromised. OR 385 Claude & Ola Neville Farm: ca. 1915 N side SR 1005 .1 mi. W of jct. w/ SR 1946 2001 Old Greensboro Road Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County White Cross Quad Prosperous dairy farm with frame Foursquare farmhouse, well-preserved„ and detached pegged frame kitchen surviving from an earlier house on the property. Claude Neville ran the farm in early 20th century. OR 386 Bryant Nevilles Farm: ca. 1860, 1926' N side SR 1005 .6 mi. E of jct w/ SR 1946 1426 Old Greensboro Road Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County White Cross Quad Typical one-room log house and log smokehouse built for Bryant Nevilles ca. 1860 and very well-preserved. Sits behind 1926 frame bungalow of Bryant's son. • • OR 387 House: ca. 1900 W side SR 1945 .6 mi. S of jct w/ NC 54 2500 block Neville Road Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County White Cross Quad Decrepit, abandoned 2-story Triple A farmhouse of typical construction, no out- buildings. OR 388 Charlie & Sophie Minor Farm: ca. 1910 S side NC 54 .3 mi E of jct w/ SR 1945 981 54 West Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County White Cross Quad Relatively well-preserved black farm with frame pyramidal cottage and four frame outbuildings of varying ages built for Charlie and Sophie Minor. OR 389 Reeves House: late 19th century W side Reeves Road .3 mi. S of jct w/ NC 54 Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County White Cross Quad Typical one-room log house said to have been home of Albert Reeves, now abandoned. • • OR 390 Tom Dollar Farm: mid-late 19th century rear, early 20th century front W. side Hatch Rd (SR 1944) just N. of Old Greensboro Rd (SR 1005) Carrboro vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad Mid-late 19th century log rear, early 20th century frame 2-story triple-A front; said by locals to have been the Tom Dollar Farm originally. OR 391 Herbert McCauley Farm: ca. 1875 N. side SR 1005 between SR 1944 and Stonybrook Rd 105 Stonybrook Rd Carrboro vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad Well-preserved ca. 1875 Greek Revival/Victorian I-house with rear ell and earlier rear cross wing was owned by Herbert McCauley originally. Much expanded with a large rear wing recently. Known locally as singer James Taylor's boyhood home. V-notched log house and smokehouse on property. OR 392 Lloyd Farm: mid-late 19th century 0.2 mi E. of Hatch Rd (SR 1944) on farm road, 0.3 mi S. of NC 54 Carrboro vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad Altered mid-late 19th century house; many log outbuildings lined up in a straight line with the house. Said to have been the Lloyd farm originally. OR 393 Farm Complex: mid-late 19th century, early 20th century 0.2 mi W. of SR 1937 on Lacock Rd 731 Lacock Rd Carrboro vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad Log and frame house built in several stages from the mid-late 19th century to the early 20th century; frame and log outbuildings. It's early history is unknown. OR 394 Lloyd Farm: ca. 1910 W. side SR 1937, 0.2 mi S. of NC 54 605 Old Fayetteville Rd Carrboro vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad Ca. 1910 1 1/2 story frame house originally owned by the Lloyd family; deteriorated frame outbuildings. OR 395 Matthew and Martha McCauley Cemetery: second quarter of 19th century E. side Old Fayetteville Rd (SR 1937), S. of Jones Ferry Rd (SR 1942) (near University Lake) Carrboro vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad Early family cemetery of Matthew and Martha McCauley, who donated land for UNC; graves date to the second quarter of the 19th century. OR 396 House: early 20th century End private lane, 0.4 mi S. of Jones Ferry Rd (SR 1942) Carrboro vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad Remodeled early 20th century frame triple-A house. It's early history is unknown. OR 397 Perry "Home House": late 19th/early 20th century End Sesame Rd, 0.5 mi. S. of Old Greensboro Rd (SR 1005) Carrboro vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad Deteriorated late 19th/early 20th century 2-room frame house owned by the Perry family for most of the 20th century. OR 398 William Johnson House: late 19th/early 20th century W. side Sesame Rd, just S. of Old Greensboro Rd (SR 1005) 497 Sesame Rd Carrboro vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill T_ownship White Cross Quad Typical, but altered late 19th/early 20th century log house owned by William Johnson family and descendents since early 20th century. Jesse and Allie King lived there in early 20th century before building 2-story house across the road. OR 399 Jesse and Allie King House: ca. 1910 N. side Old Greensboro Rd (SR 1005) at jct w/ Sesame Rd 1313 Old Greensboro Rd Carrboro vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township White Cross Quad Ca. 1910 I-house built by Jesse and Allie King, remodeled in 1940s in Colonial Revival style; frame and log outbuildings. OR 400 Smyth House: mid-19th century S. side Jones Ferry Rd (SR 1942) 0.6 mi SW of Old School Rd Carrboro vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad Mid-19th century (1840s?) frame Greek Revival I-house with frame turn of the century additions. It's early history is unknown. OR 401 House: 1910s N. side SR 1942, 0.4 mi SW of Old School Rd 2011 Jones Ferry Rd Carrboro vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad 1910s pyramidal cottage, frame and log outbuildings. It's early history is unknown. OR 402 Neville's Chapel United Church of Christ: early 20th century Jct Jones Ferry Road (SR 1942) and Old School Road Carrboro vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad Early 20th century, simply-finished gable-front frame church originally served the black congregation of Strowd Grove Church, now serves black congregation of Neville's Chapel United Church of Christ. OR 403 House: early 20th century N. side SR 1942, NE of Old School Rd 1423 Jones Ferry Road Carrboro vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad Early 20th century, refurbished foursquare house. It's early history is unknown. OR 404 House: 1920s or 1930s N. side NC 54 0.1 mi E. of Neville RD (SR 1945) Carrboro vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township White Cross Quad 1920s or 1930s sawn log house, somewhat deteriorated. It's early history is unknown. OR 405 Bethel Baptist Church: early 20th century SE side Bethel-Hickory Grove Church Rd (SR 1104) at jct w/ Jo Mac Rd (SR 1103) Carrboro vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township White Cross Quad Early 20th century Gothic Revival in good condition has artificial siding, beautiful setting. Large cemetery to rear. OR 406 Lloyd-Cheek House: early to mid-19th (?); ca. 1914 E. side SR 1112, just S. of SR 1104 1801 Dairyland Rd Carrboro vicinity • Orange County/Chapel Hill T ownship White Cross Quad Early to mid-19th century log rear ell (?); ca. 1914 I-house front; remodeled. Originally owned by Lloyd family, later by Ola and Lemuel Cheek for most 20th century, Modern dairy farm buildings. OR 407 Paul Brewer House: late 19th century W. side SR 1112, just S. of SR 1179 2328 Dairy land Rd Carrboro vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township White Cross Quad Much altered but typical late 19th century log house with rear ell. Built by Paul Brewer. OR 408 House: early 20th century W. side SR 1112 down private drive, 0.3 mi N. of SR 1179 2612 (?) Dairy land Rd Carrboro vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township White Cross Quad Early 20th century one-story frame house house, much expanded and altered. It's early history is unknown. OR 409 House: mid-late 19th century S. side Dairy land Rd (now SR 1177) down farm rd, just SW of Rocky Ridge Rd (SR 1113) Carrboro vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township White Cross Quad Deteriorated mid-late 19th century log house with large stone chimney, log rear ell, and front frame ell. It's early history is unknown. OR 410 Nutter House (?): mid-late 19th century W. side Meadow View Rd (no SR #) 0.5 mi N. of Dairyland Rd (SR 1177) 6500 block of Meadow View Rd Carrboro vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township White Cross Quad Typical mid-late 19th century log house. It's early history is unknown. OR 411 Baldwin House: mid-late 19th century N. side SR 1115, 0.5 mi W. of SR 1113 1931 Arthur Minnis Rd Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township White Cross Quad Typical mid-late 19th century log house with 1-room frame side addition and rear ell. Owned by the Baldwin family for many years. OR 412 House: mid-19th century E. side SR 1179 just S. of SR 1113 6010 or 6020 Union Grove Church Rd Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township White Cross Quad Much expanded but typical mid-19th century (?) log house on modern dairy farm-- retains its original stone chimneys and a few doors. It's early history is unknown. OR 413 House: early 20th century N. side Purple Lane (no SR #) 0.5 mi E. of Union Grove Church Rd (SR 1179) Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township White Cross Quad Much altered and deteriorated early 20th century I-house with rear ell and stone-based chimneys with brick stacks. It's early history is unknown. OR 414 Lloyd-Andrews Farm: 19th century log house; ca. 1895 frame farmhouse E. side SR 1111, 0.6 mi N. of SR 1104 8407 Union Grove Church Rd Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad Murch remodeled typical 19th century log house originally owned by the Lloyd family; ca. 1895 frame farmhouse built by C. F. Andrews remodeled as a bungalow in the 1920s and remodeled again recently. Several frame outbuildings and a frame and stone barn. OR 415 Andrews Farm Tenant House: early 20th century 0.3 mi S. of Albert Rd (SR 1179) on farm rd Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township White Cross Quad Early 20th century 1 1/2frame saddlebag house was tenant house on Andrews farm. OR 416 House: early 20th century N. side Arthur Minnis Rd (SR 1113) just SE of Union Grove Church Rd (SR 1179) Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township White Cross Quad Remodeled early 20th century I-house; several frame outbuildings. It's early history is unknown. OR 417 Cates-Dodson-Minnis Farm: Early 20th century NW side SR 1113 just NE of SR 1179 923 Arthur Minnis Rd Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township White Cross Quad Early 20th century I-house owned by Arch Cates originally, later owned by Albert Dodson followed by Albert and Lois Dodson Minnis. Remodeled 1940s. Frame outbuildings. OR 418 House: 20th century SE side Arthur Minnis Rd (SR 1113), E. of Union Grove Church Rd (SR 1179) Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad New, hand-hewn log house very similar to the standard historic one-room log house built on many local farms in the nineteenth century. OR 419 House: turn of the century N. side SR 1113, just E. of SR 1127 500 block Arthur Minnis Rd Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Hillsborough Quad Remodeled turn of the century triple-A house. It's early history is unknown. OR 420 Bishop House: 1920s W side .1 mi. S of jct w/ SR 1113 . 5613 Old NC 86 Chapel Hill vicinity, Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Late example of a frame Triple-A I-house, with substantial alterations; said to have been built by Bishop family. Two outbuildings. OR 421 Booker House & Store: ca. 1920 E side Old NC 86 .1 mi. S of jct w/ SR 1113 Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Small frame pyramidal cottage and frame box-and-canopy type rural store, built for Booker family. OR 422 House: 19th century End of Mountain Creek Rd., E side Old NC 86 .15 mi. S of jct. w/ SR 1113 Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Typical one-room log house, now abandoned; early history is unknown. OR 423 Hamlett House: ca. 1920 S side Mountain Creek Rd. .6 mi. E of jct. with Old NC 86 .Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township,.Orange County Chapel Hill Quad • Altered and very late example of frame Triple-A I-house, now owned by Hamlett family. OR 424 Dr. Wynn House: 19th century N side Mountain Creek Rd. .4 mi. E of jct. with Old NC 86 Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Large frame I-house with considerable alteration; perhaps dating from mid-19th century but integrity is compromised; early history unknown. OR 425 Neville House: mid-19th century E side, .2 mi. S of jct. with SR 1113 5916 Old NC 86 Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Possibly eligible for National Register as an unusually well-preserved and early example of typical one-room log house, with late Federal style mantel; owned by Nevilles, a black family, for many years. OR 426 House: 19th century W side Old NC 86 1.2 mi. N of jct. with SR 1727 6507 Old NC 86 Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Typical one-room log house with addition, some alteration; early history un- known. OR 427 Alton Bishop House: ca. 1900 E side 1 mi. N of jct. with SR 1727 6408 Old NC 86 Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Typical frame Triple-A I-house with some alterations, several early outbuildings; owned by Bishop family for many years. OR 428 Farm: 1920s W side Old NC 86 .1 mi. N of jct. with SR 1727 Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Typical frame side-gable bungalow and four outbuildings of various ages; early history unknown. OR 429 House: 1920s S side .4 mi. dirt lane, W side Old NC 86 at jct. with SR 1727 Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Small, truncated 2-story frame house with central chimney is unusual house form that may have been built as a tenant house; now abandoned. OR 430 Farm: late 19th century end of .3 mi. dirt lane, S side SR 1727 .5 mi. E of jct. with Old NC 86 7715 Leek Lane Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Typical one-room log house with a new, substantial addition; two early log out- buildings; early history unknown. OR 431 Lloyd-Rogers House: 1850s E side SR 1729 .5 mi. N of jct. with SR 1777 1612 Purefoy Rd. Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Unusual 2-story frame farmhouse with all brick chimneys and raised brick foun- dation; apparently antebellum but integrity is gone. Believed to have been built by Lloyd family. OR 432 Blackwood Farm, Post Office & General Store: mid 19th century W side SR 1725 .6 mi. S of jct. with NC 86 at Blackwood Station 6407 Millhouse Rd. Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad One-room log house with two originally detached log kitchens, log barn and numerous frame outbuildings; said to have been built by Blackwoods and to have had the Blackwood post office and general store here after railroad came through. OR 433 (former) Blackwood Grist Mill: ca. 1910. E side SR 1725 .5 mi. N of jct. with SR 1727 at Eubanks 6808 Millhouse Rd. Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Blackwood family built this small frame grist_mill with stone basement; con- verted to a house in 1950s and lost its architectural integrity. OR 434. Sam & Laura Nunn House: ca. 1905. E side SR 1725 .15 mi. N of jct. w/ SR 1727 73 Millhouse Road Blackwood vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Latest documented typical one-room log house in township; built by Sam Nunn for his family. Unusual because full 2 stories tall; 1 frame outbuilding. One of only 2 2-story log houses found in township. OR 435. John Kirkland Farm: 1850s? SE jct Old NC 86 & SR 1727 7508 Old NC 86 Calvander vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad 2-story frame antebellum house, apparently built for John Kirkland. Enlarged ca. 1900 and later and has lost original architectural integrity. Three early log out- buildings. OR 436. Cate Farm: ca. 1929 E side Old NC 86 .25 mi. S of jct w/ SR 1727 Calvander vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Typical frame side-gable bungalow built for Robert Oscar Cate, a dairy farmer; five frame outbuildings. OR 437. Rigsby House: mid-19th century? W side Old NC 86 .3 mi. S of jct. w/ SR 1727 8013 Old NC 86 Calvander vicinity • Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Typical one-room log house with additions that obscure its form; early log barn converted to a house; early history unknown. OR 438. Lloyd-Neville Farm: 1920s NE jct. of SR 1104 and SR 1111 529 Dairyland Road Calvander vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Typical frame pyramidal cottage and three frame outbuildings, built for a Lloyd family. OR 439. House: 1880s? End of .6 mi. dirt lane, S side SR 1104 .005 mi. W of jct. with Old NC 86 Calvander vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County' Chapel Hill Quad Two-story frame house, apparently built in stages; unusual Greek Revival style doorway seems to be reused from another dwelling; early history unknown. OR 440. Henry Lloyd Farm: 1880s? End of .2 mi. dirt lane, W side SR 1107 .1 mi. S of jct w/ Old NC 86 1019 Old Fayetteville Road Calvander vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Frame farmhouse that grew in stages; six log and frame outbuildings dating from 19th to early 20th centuries enclose a rectangular barnyard; said to have been built for Henry Lloyd. OR 441. Matthew Strowd Farm: Late 19th Century. End of .2 mi. dirt lane, W side SR 1107 (Old NC 86), .3 mi. S of jct. w/ SR 1009 Carrboro vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Well-preserved frame I-house built for Strowd family; three early log and frame outbuildings. OR 442. Wilson-Atwater Farm: ca. 1910 N side NC 54 opp. jct. w/ SR 1944 1312 Hatch Rd Carrboro vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Typical 1-story frame Triple-A farmhouse and 3 frame outbuildings; said to have originally been owned by the Wilson family. OR443. Walter Creech House: 1850s?; 1941. N side NC 54 .15 mi. E of jct w/ SR 1944 426 NC 54 Carrboro vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Colonial Revival style frame house built in 1941 out of an antebellum 2-story frame house moved from Chatham County, turned gable-end to front, with flanking 1-story wing additions. OR 444. James Tilley Farm: ca. 1870, moved 1972. N side NC 54 .3 mi. W of jct w/ SR 1107 410 NC 54 Carrboro vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Small frame 1-house built ca. 1870 and moved further away from NC 54 in 1972; integrity is compromised. Detached frame kitchen is well-preserved. Original owner James Tilley is buried in graveyard on farm. OR 445. Thomas Hogan Farm: 1870s, late 19th century. E side Old NC 86 .2 mi. S of jct w/ SR 1777 9118 Old NC 86 Calvander Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Two-story frame L-plan farmhouse built around a 1-story frame house with late Greek Revival style interior fabric; built for Civil War veteran Thomas Hogan. One outbuilding. OR 446. Brodie Lloyd Farm: ca. 1918 E side Old NC 86 .3 mi. S of jct w/ SR 1777 9409 Old NC 86 Calvander vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Large and unusually stylish bungalow for township; built for farmer and lumber dealer Brodie Lloyd. Two outbuildings. • OR 447. Cheek House: 1920s. SW jct of Old NC 86 & SR 1777 3909 Old NC 86 Calvander Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Typical frame side-gable bungalow built for the Cheek family. OR 448: Clay Hogan Dairy Farm: ca. 1930. N side SR 1777 .4 mi E of jct w/ Old NC 86 855 Lake Hogan Farm Rd Calvander vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Impressive collection of frame dairy buildings dating from 1930s built for Clay Hogan, but the farmhouse is apparently gone. OR 449. William D. Hogan House: 1908. N side SR 1777 1 mi. W of jct w/ SR 1729 1018 Homestead Rd Calvander vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Small well-preserved frame I-house with two later outbuildings, built for William D. Hogan. OR 450. Hogan House: 1890s. S side SR 1777 .9 mi. W of jct w/ SR 1729 1411 Homestead Road Calvander vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Typical one-room log house overbuilt about 1935 and integrity compromised; built for the Hogan family who lived up and down this road. OR 451 Brown House: mid-19th century 0.3 mi SE of SR 1723 on private Rd 923 New Hope Church Rd Hillsborough vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill T ownship Hillsborough Quad Much remodeled and_expanded mid-19th century log house with huge stone chimney. It's early history is unknown. OR 452 Craig-Blackwood House: ca. 1811 (?) NW side SR 1723 just W. of I-40 1020 New Hope Church Rd Hillsborough vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Hillsborough Quad Circa 1811 (?) 1 1/2 story log house with turn of the century farm additions said to have been owned by Craig family originally but owned by the Blackwood family for many years. OR 453 Lloyd Farm: ca. 1867 W. side SR 1009, 1 mi. S. of SR 1129 4607 Old Hillsborough Rd Hillsborough vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Hillsborough Quad Ca. 1867 log house has several additions and has been remodeled. Original log section built by Andrew Green Ruffin Lloyd with subsequent additions by later generations of the Lloyd family. Frame outbuildings. OR 454 Luther Craig House: ca. 1911 W. side SR 1009, 0.7 mi N. of SR 1723 4807 Old Hillsborough Rd Hillsborough vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Hillsborough Quad Remodeled ca. 1911 I-house with earlier rear ell said to have been the Luther Craig House for many years. Several early 20th century barns and a log house moved from a nearby farm in the 1930s. OR 455 John Borland House: ca. 1890 E. side Borland Rd (SR 1127), 0.3 mi N. of SR 1723 Hillsborough vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Hillsborough Quad Ca. 1890 2-story log house with 1/2 dovetail notches built by John Borland on his 100- acre farm. One of only 2 two-story log houses in Chapel Hill Township. Renovated and expanded in recent years. OR 456 Strayhorn Farm: Turn of the century I-house, mid-19th c. rear section Jct. SR 1723 & NC 86, S. corner 1709 New Hope Church Rd Hillsborough vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Hillsborough Quad Remodeled turn of the century I-house, mid-19th c. rear section said to have been in the Strayhorn family originally. Log smokehouse and frame barn. OR 457 Craig-Strayhorn-Blackwood Farm: ca. 1827 with later additions W. side NC 86, 0.2 mi N. of SR 1723 4215 NC 86 Hillsborough vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Hillsborough Quad Much remodeled and expanded ca. 1827 log house has two stone chimneys standing side by side--one huge example dated 1827, the other smaller dated 1840. Nice collection of early 20th century farm buildings on this 140-acre farm. Thought to have been owned by the Craig family originally, but Herbert and Alice Blackwood bought the farm from the Strayhorn family in 1906. OR 458 New Hope Presbyterian Church Cemetery: late 18th century to present • SE & SW side NC 86, 0.3 mi SE of SR 1723 Hillsborough vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Hillsborough Quad Ca. 1868 cemetery of New Hope Presbyterian Church (founded 1756) includes several hand-carved markers and nice turn of the century stones. 1942 memorial to local Revolutionary War soldiers also located in yard. Earlier church cemetery is located across NC 86. OR 459 Alexander Craig House: late 18th/early 19th century (?) SE side NC 86, just N. of SR 1718 5266 New Hope Church Rd Hillsborough vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Hillsborough Quad Late 18th/early 19th century log or frame house said to have been owned by Alexander Craig and Craig family descendants for many years. OR 460 House: ca. 1910 NW side SR 1723, 0.7 mi NE of NC 86 2317 New Hope Church Rd Hillsborough vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Hillsborough Quad Ca. 1910 one-story T-shaped simple Victorian house. It's early history is unknown. OR 461 Broadwell House: ca. 1910 E. side SR 1712, 0.5 mi N. of SR 1720 4022 University Station Rd Hillsborough vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Hillsborough Quad Well-preserved ca. 1910 Victorian triple-A I-house owned by the Broadwell family for many years. ' OR 462 Brockwell House: early 20th century E. side SR 1712 just N. of SR 1720 4402 University Station Rd Hillsborough vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Hillsborough Quad Deteriorated early 20th century I-house with rear ell, detached kitchen. It's early history is unknown. • OR 463 Davis Farm: late 19th century N. side-SR 1718, 1 mi E. of SR 1712 4200 Mt. Sinai Rd Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Hillsborough Quad Remodeled late 19th_century I-house with frame and log outbuildings. Said to have been owned by the Davis family for many years, but it's early history is unknown. OR 464 Thomas Kirkland House: mid-19th century W. side SR 1712 just N. of SR 1718 5303 University Station Rd Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Hillsborough Quad Mid-19th century 2-room frame house with TOC additions started before the Civil War by Thomas Kirkland and finished when he came home. OR 465 Couch House: early 20th c. front, antebellum log ell End Sunnyridge Road N. of Mt. Sinai Road (SR 1718) Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Hillsborough Quad Early 20th century frame I-house with two-tier porch built onto an antebellum log rear ell with a massive stone chimney. Owned in the 20th century by a black family by the name of Couch. OR 466 William Shambley House: ca. 1860 S side SR 1716 .05 mi E of jct w/ SR 1713 5603 Cornwallis Rd Hillsborough vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Hillsborough Quad Typical, well-preserved one-room log house built by William Shambley just be- fore he fought in Civil War. OR 467 Murphy School & Teacherage(?): ca. 1925 SW jct. Old NC 10 & SR 1716 Hillsborough vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Hillsborough Quad Only remaining example of an early consolidated public school remaining in township; 1-story brick building with Neoclassical auditorium addition. Frame bungalow at rear may be the teacherage. Probably eligible for National Register. OR 468 Archibald Lynch House: ca. 1870, ca. 1890 .05 mi. dirt lane, E side SR 1713 .5 mi S of jct w/ Old NC 10 6217 Mt. Herman Church Road Hillsborough vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Hillsborough Quad Small frame I-house with rear ell said to be slightly earlier; built for farmer Ar- chibald Lynch. OR 469 William Edgar Shambley House: ca. 1900 NW jct. SR 1713 & 1716 5800 Mt. Herman Church Road Hillsborough vicinity Orange County _ Hillsborough Quad William Edgar Shambley, grandson of William Shambley (OR 466), built this typi- cal one-room log house about 1900; additions obscure the form. OR 470 Sam Couch Farm: ca. 1848 N side SR 1716 (Cornwallis Road) .7 mi. E of jct w/ SR 1713 Hillsborough vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Hillsborough Quad One of the few large antebellum houses in the township, this well-preserved 2- story frame house with Greek Revival style trim was built for farmer Sam Couch; the farm retains the log kitchen, log granary, log crib, and 3 early frame outbuildings. Probably eligible for National Register. OR 471 William Couch Farm: ca. 1867 S side SR 1716 .3 mi W of jct w/ SR 1717 4525 Cornwallis Road Durham vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Northwest Durham Quad Extremely well-preserved 2-story frame house built by Civil War veteran William Couch; ca. 1830 log homestead stands adjacent, and four log outbuildings. Probably eligible for National Register as one of best-preserved mid-19th century farmsteads in township. OR 472 John & Page Couch House: Late 19th century; ca. 1910 N side SR 1716 .3 mi W of jct w/ SR 1717 4522 Cornwallis Road Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Northwest Durham Quad Small frame house built ca. 1910 as front addition to typical one-room log house; log barn and log tenant(?) house stand to rear. Built for brothers John and Page Couch. OR 473 House: Late 19th century W side SR 1717 .2 mi S of jct w/ SR 1716 4406 Kerley Road Durham vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County • Northwest Durham Quad Typical one-room log house; integrity compromised by additions that converted it to a barn. Early history unknown. OR 474 B. B. Olive Farm: 1920s S side SR 1718 .T5 mi W of jct w/ SR 1717 5815 Mt. Sinai Road Durham vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Southwest Durham Quad Substantial frame bungalow and six log and frame outbuildings on a spacious farmstead that is now owned by B. B. Olive; early history unknown. OR 475 Mt. Sinai Baptist Church Cemetery: ca. 1900 N side SR 1718 .6 mi W of jct w/ SR 1717 Durham vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad This black congregation was established in 1870, and the church building is not historic. Cemetery is well-maintained and has small marble and concrete head- stones dating from 1900. OR 476 Henry & Lora Trice Farm: ca. 1920 End of dirt lane, S side SR 1718 at jct w/ SR 1719 5720 Old Stony Way Durham vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Frame side-gable, 1 1/2 story farmhouse built for Henry and Lora Trice, a black couple who owned a 36 acre farm here. House abandoned and deteriorated. OR477 Donald-Brown Farm: 1885 W side SR 1791 .3 mi. E of jct w/ SR 1734 5015 Mt. Moriah Road Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Well-preserved 1885 farmstead containing a frame 1 1/2 story side-gable, cen- ter hall house and five original frame outbuildings; owned since 1905 by Patter- son Mill miller George Brown and now by his children. OR 478 House: ca. 1915 NE side SR 1733 .5 mi N of jet w/ SR 1734 300 Weaver Dairy Road Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad Typical frame pyramidal cottage with a log smokehouse and a frame barn; early history unknown. OR 479 House: ca. 1910 E side SR 1734 .5 mi S of jct w/ SR 1791 430 Erwin Road Chapel Hill vicinity Chapel Hill Township, Orange County Chapel Hill Quad • Triple-A I-house with original porch; gabled balcony over center bay; some alterations. One frame barn. Early history unknown. • OR 480 Mount Moriah Baptist Church Cemetery: mid-late 19th cent. W. side Erwin Rd (SR 1734) 0.2 mi S. of Whitfield Rd (SR 1731) Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad This large church cemetery contains graves dating from the 1870s to the present marked mostly with manufactured stones. Mount Moriah Baptist Church was founded prior to the Civil War. The church building on the site is new. OR 481 Erwin Farm: 1930s 0.4 mi N. of jct Whitfield Rd (SR 1731) and Erwin Rd (SR 1734) on private road Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad Log smokehouse, corn crib, and tobacco-curing barn still stand on old house site. 1930s log house on a steep ridge overlooking New Hope Creek is said to have been a retreat for Mr. Erwin, who owned Erwin Cotton Mill in Durham. OR 482 Clark House: late 19th century W. side SR 1732, 0.3 mi N. of SR 1733 7510 Sunrise Rd Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad Much remodeled and expanded 2-room log house said to have been owned by the Clark family. OR 483 Will Mayse Farm: early 20th century S. side Oak Hill Rd (SR 1835) 0.2 mi E. of Sunrise Rd (SR 1732) Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad Remodeled early 20th c. triple-A I-house owned by Will Mayse; log tobacco outbuildings. OR 484 John Joseph Whitfield Farm: ca. 1879 S. side SR 1731, 0.1 mi E. of SR 1732 4113 Whitfield Rd Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad Ca. 1879 I-house with rear ell and later Mt. Vernon Porch built by John Joseph Whitfield; nice domestic complex OR 485 Ed Kirkland House: mid-19th century S. side SR 1718 just W. of SR 1712 3111 Mt. Sinai Rd Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad Deteriorated antebellum one-story with attic log house with original interior features owned by Ed Kirkland in the early 20th century. OR 486 Couch-Trice House: mid-19th century 0.2 mi S. of Mt. Sinai Rd (SR 1718) down farm road Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad Much altered pre-Civil War (?) hall-parlor plan house owned by the Couch and Trice families in the 20th century. OR 487 Blackwood Station: early 20th century Jct NC 86 & Mt. Sinai Rd (SR 1718) Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad Early 20th c. railroad community includes two frame bungalows; a deteriorated gable- front store building; and a much remodeled frame building said to have originally served as a store and post office; and a 1950s or 1960s grocery store. OR 488 House: ca. 1920 W. side Alexander Rd (SR 1839), NE of NC 86 Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad Ca. 1920 L-shaped frame house with Craftsman porch supports; frame and log outbuildings. It's early history is unknown. OR 489 Clyde Hogan House: late 19th/early 20th century W. side NC 86, 0.5 mi N. of I-40 2112 NC 86 Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad Somewhat remodeled late 19th/early 20th century I-house; log smokehouse, log corn crib, frame garage, and a vertical board frame building which may have been a detached kitchen stand in back yard. It's early history is unknown. OR 490 John Kirkland House: 1860s Just E. of NC 86 on Kirkland Rd 6814 Kirkland Rd Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad Antebellum log house built by John Kirkland expanded to side around the turn of the century with frame addition and then topped with a triple-A roof. Some original., interior woodwork. Kitchen attached by breezeway; board and Batten smokehouse and stilted dairy in yard. OR 491 Patterson House: late 18th/early 19th century W. of jct Erwin Rd (SR 1734) & Whitfield Rd (SR 1731) Chapel Hill vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad late 18th/early 19th c. Federal house originally associated with the Patterson family, much expanded and remodeled in 20th century. Although retains some original woodwork, the house has lost its integrity with the expansions. OR 492 Union Grove Methodist Church: 1946 W. side Union Grove Church Rd (SR 1179), 0.3 mi S. of Arthur Minnis Rd (SR 1113) Carrboro vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Chapel Hill Quad Well-preserved ca. 1946 stone Gothic Revival Church built for congregation of Union Grove Methodist Church (established 1846). OR 493 (former) Hickory Grove School: early 20th century N. side NC 54 at jct w/ Neville Rd (SR 1945) 1116 Broadwell Rd Carrboro vicinity Orange County/Chapel Hill Township White Cross Quad Early 20th century school one room gable front schoolhouse for blacks in the Hickory Grove community has been remodeled and now serves as a house. OR 494 Davis Farm W. side Old NC 86, 0.5 mi down dirt farm Road Chapel Hill vic. Orange County/Chapel Hill Township Hillsborough Quad Late nineteenth-century farm complex with remodeled farmhouse and very important collection of log and frame farm buildings, including a rare cotton gin house. Known locally as the Davis Farm. • • PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PHASE II CONTRACT for The Orange County Architectural Survey, II Funded by FY 1992 Survey and Planning Grant and The County of Orange This Project Description and Contract are herein agreed to this 7 - day of _ y , 1992 by the County of Orange, hereinafter known as the Grantee; Jody Carter and Todd Peck, hereinafter known as the Consultants; and the Division of Archives and History, hereinafter known as the Division. The Grantee will identify a Local Coordinator, Marvin Collins, who will work with the Consultant and the Division Representative throughout the project. The project will be conducted according to the Standards established by the Division, and will be subject to its review, supervision, advice and final acceptance by the Division. A. SCOPE OF WORK: The purpose of the project is to complete the architectural survey of Orange County outside of the cities/towns of Chapel Hill and Hillsborough. The survey of one township, Chapel Hill township, was funded in FY 1991. Findings of the FY 1991 and FY 1992 surveys will be incorporated immediately into the Orange County Planning Department landuse data base. The project will be accomplished under the supervision of the State Historic Preservation Office (HPO) , and both HPO supervisory staff and the Principal Investigators will meet 36 CFR 61 qualifications. Survey methodology and evaluation will meet the Secretary's Standards for Identification and Evaluation. The work will consist of completing survey forms, maps, and a survey report for approximately 600 properties, using HPO survey forms, methodology, and survey handbook. B. TIME SCHEDULE: The project is scheduled for nine months, beginning on .or after the date of this contract and terminating no later than September 30, 1993. The attached Time-Product-Payment Schedule is to followed throughout the course of the project. Orange County Phase II Contract Page 2 C. SUMMARY METHODOLOGY FOR INVENTORY OF HISTORIC RESOURCES: The Consultant will conduct the Survey according to the research design developed in Phase I of the project with the guidance and support of the Local Coordinator and the Division Representative and will follow guidelines in The North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office Survey Manual: Instructions for Recordinc Historic Resources (hereinafter cited as NC Survey Manual) , supplementary guidelines provided by the Division, and the calendar and details of the project schedule developed by the Consultant. These state standards are in compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's "Standards for Identification" and "Standards for Evaluation. " Any publications produced from the inventory must be reviewed and approved by the Division before publication. This review will include design and content. The Consultant will record all significant properties in the project area individually or in groups either by completion of the Statewide Survey inventory form and photographic recording and mapping or map- coding according to Division system for Statewide Survey. General standards (adapted to the resources of the project area) for inclusion of categories or types of properties individually, in groups, or by map coding will be established by the Consultant with the advice of the Division. These standards will be part of the project methodology developed by the consultant. The Consultant will work closely with local historians and other individuals to ensure accurate coverage of local history. Oral history and primary documentation will be collected and integrated where possible. The Consultant will evaluate properties using National Register criteria and with reference to appropriate contexts. For the purposes of payment and the satisfaction of the terms of this contract it is understood that the completion of the survey in specified areas of the county, represented by USGS quadrangles or other geographical units, consists of the following items: 1. Intensive field work in the designated area including a review of all structures on all roads and streets and map-coding or survey of all significant structures on all roads and streets. At the completion of the survey, the working maps used by the.consultant in the field will be submitted, along with one complete set of clean neatly labelled USGS maps showing the specific location of all sites (building, properties, districts) recorded and map-coded during the survey. Orange County Phase II Contract Page 3 2. Completed\survey files for each significant properties will meet guidelines, in NC Survey Manual and will include: a. a survey file folder correctly labeled; b. a completed North Carolina Historic Structure Data Sheet; c. all record photographs of each property, properly labeled, including overall views, detail views, interior views, and photographs of outbuildings and their details where applicable. These photographs are to be submitted in the form of enlarged contacts of not more than nine images per 8X10 sheet in the Division's standard format. If commercial photography laboratories are used in lieu of the Division's photographic services, photographic proofs must be equal to the Division's standard format; d. for most properties, a hand-drawn or other applicable site plan, showing outbuildings and related features, and a floor plan (where examination of the interior is possible and the plan is of significance to the understanding of the building) . Such sketches may be done on the blank pages of the Historic Structure Data Sheet or separately on 8 1/2" by 11" paper, properly labeled. e. a typed, double-spaced summary description of the property (the "entry") that summarizes its history, setting, architectural form and character, integrity, associated features, and significance. • f. a typed, completed negative envelope containing the negatives (in their plastic sleeves) for the enlarged contacts of each property. g. any documentary information and notes collected on the property. 3. The gathering of historical information on the construction and occupation of each property will include all necessary on-site and telephone interviews with property owners, former owners, and other persons who can provide information on the construction, occupation, and development of the property. Orange County Phase II Contract Page 4 This information is to be recorded--to the extent space allows--on the blank pages of the data sheets and additional 8X10 sheets, and referenced by source and date of the conversation/interview. 4. The recording of any property includes the making of color slides of the property, as appropriate. In some instances there may be one slide of the property where in other cases of more significant buildings, there may be up to a dozen slides of the property, its pertinent details, its outbuildings, and its site. 5. The Consultant and Local Coordinator will make presentations at one to three public meetings to inform community of project and obtain information and support; additional presentations will be negotiated separately. 6. The Consultant with the assistance of the Local Coordinator and Division Representative, will make a Study List presentation (written and oral) to the State Professional Review Committee encompassing property and districts evaluated as eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. D. FINAL REPORT: At the end of the project the Consultant will submit to the Division a final report before final reimbursement is made. This report will follow instructions in the NC Survey Manual and appropriate Federal bulletins. The report and the survey files will be reviewed by the Division staff and revised by the Consultant and the revisions approved before final payment is made. Time should be allowed for revision. The final report will be a professionally written essay evaluating the general historical and architectural development of the project area. The essay will be organized as a Multiple Property Documentation Form, with historic contexts and property types, and will follow the guides set out in Bulletin 16: Guidelines for completing National Register of Historic Places Forms, pp. 17-35. The final submission shall also include all survey materials described in item C.2.a.-f. above prepared to Division standards. Note: The grantee will also receive a copy of the final report. (The Grantee will also obtain duplicate files, photocopies of survey forms, duplicate proofs, and entries. ) Orange County Phase II Contract Page 5 E. .... PROJECT BUDGET\iND ACCOUNTING PROCEDURES: The final budget for the project is as follows: Personnel: $38,350 PI's 27,500 Secretary 1,800 Coordinator 1,800 Intern 7,250 Office/Telephone 1,600 Travel/Per Diem 2, 500 Supplies/maps, misc. 1,650 Film/Developing 2,900 TOTAL 47000 Each time reimbursements are requested from the Division by the Grantee project expenditures should be documented with cancelled (or certified) checks and invoices, and attached to a cover letter addressed to: Ms. Lloyd D. Childers, Grants-in-Aid Administrator, 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh, NC 27611. At the end of the project the Grantee will submit to the Division a .project completion report before final reimbursement is made, and it will include the following components: 1. Restatement of project description evaluating project's original goals and actual achievements. 2. Copies of any report, publications, or brochures generated by the project. 3. Statement of financial documentation. F. SERVICES AND GOODS PROVIDED BY DIVISION: In order to ensure the consistent application of Statewide Survey standards and to provide support and guidance to sponsoring agencies and the Consultant, the Division will provide the following services and goods as budget and staff permit: 1. Orientation for Consultant on all projects to ensure familiarity with Statewide Survey standards and procedures, resources of Archives and History, and National Register of Historic Places program. Orange County Phase II Contract Page 6 2. Inventory forms, inventory folders, labels, and negative envelopes required fox inventory. Nomination forms for nomination projects. 3. Clerical support for integrating photographs into Statewide Survey files. 4. Data entry into CREP program. 5. Archival storage and maintenance of inventory materials including negatives. 6. Professional instruction and guidance in defining, the research design, conducting, and completing the inventory or preparation of nominations. A staff member of Archives and History will be assigned to work directly with the Consultant to serve as liaison with the Division and to provide on-site and office assistance, guidance throughout the project, support in conducting the work and assistance in evaluation according to National Register criteria and appropriate contexts. Review and approval of the inventory essay and National Register nominations by the Survey and Planning Branch is required. 7. Processing and printing of black and white photographs at Division cost, if desired by Grantee. A cost list will be provided to the Grantee for various photography items. NOTE: The Division seeks to process photographs quickly to expedite the inventory projects, but problems of labor and supplies sometimes generate long backlogs. A three-week processing time is usual, but sometimes six weeks to two months may occur. If the Grantee chooses to use the Division's photo lab services, the Grantee acknowledges the possibility of backlogs noted as above. 8. Presentation coordination of Study List to the State Professional Review Committee. Orange County Phase II Contract Page 7 9. Presentation of information about National Register program to a public meeting (set up by Local Coordinator) for district or multiple resource nomination, . 10. Compliance with all notification requirements. (Names and addresses of property owners will be provided by Consultant and/or Local Coordinator. ) H. SERVICES AND GOODS PROVIDED BY THE GRANTEE: To ensure that the project will operate efficiently on the local level for the Consultant, the Grantee agrees to do the following: 1. Conduct local administration and accounting of the grant. 2. Provide prompt secretarial assistance (if a part of the budget) for the project, understanding that deadlines established in the project schedule must be met. 3. Provide adequate office space (if a part of the project budget) for the Consultant including a telephone and desk. 4. Assist Consultant in developing local contacts and generating publicity for the project. 5. Take responsibility for duplicating files and contents for local purposes. 6. Compile and submit completion report and all materials generated by the inventory. J. PERSONAL INCOME AND SELF-EMPLOYMENT TAX RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CONSULTANT: It is understood that the Consultant is being employed as a professional and is an independent contractor, and that payment for services constitutes a fee which excludes all employment taxes and related benefits. The Grantee will be responsible for filing appropriate IRS income statements (FORM 1099) for the Consultant. Orange County Phase II Contract Page 8- I. OTHER_STIPULATIONt:: . Please refer to the attached "Appendix for Subgrant Agreements" for stipulations regarding procurement; retention of records; changes in scope; prohibition of lobbying; non-federal audit; publications; suspension or termination of subgrant; standards for final products; equal opportunity; and other requirements. NONDISCRIMINATION ASSURANCES: In consideration of the signing of this Contract for the performance of work and furnishing of labor and materials as set forth herein, the parties hereto for themselves, their agents, officials, and employees or servants agree not to discriminate in any manner. on the basis of age, handicap, sex, race, color, creed, sexual orientation, or national origin with reference to the subject matter of this Contract, no matter how remote. This provision is hereby incorporated into this Contract for the benefit of the Grantee and may be enforced by action for specific performance, injunctive relief, or other remedy as by law provided. We the undersigned, having read, understood, and agreed to the terms of this project description and contract, so affix our signatures this 7:244 day of 4.4+ 4e∎L 19 9 a y Grantee: . Consultant: Moses Carey, Chair / J er Board of County Commioners 72L/4__ Attest: •/ Todd Peck /4. • /,•/c Beverly Bly; e Div-is-ion of Archives and History Clerk to Board of Commissioners r k=3.-rook Division of Archives and History Time-Product-Payment Schedule Orange County Historic Survey PAY PERIOD PRODUCT SALARY DUE 10/9/92- Planning Phase $2800 10/30/92 Comprehensive Survey 1 . 10/30/92- Survey Hillsborough, NW 1300 11 /13/92 Durham, and Rougemont Quads (approx. 75 sites ) 2. 11 /13/92- Survey White Cross 1300 11 /27/92 Quad (approx. 80 sites ) 3 . 11 /27/92- Entries and completed 12/11 /92 files for Hillsborough, NW 1300 Durham, and Rougemont . 4 . 12/11 /92- Survey Caldwell Quad 12/23/92 (approx. 80 sites ) 1300 5. 12/28/92- White Cross entries and 1300 1 /11 /93 completed files 6. 1 /11 /93- Complete Survey of 1300 1 /25/93 Caldwell Quad (approx. 80 sites ) 7.1 /25/:93- Caldwell Quad. entries 1300 2/8/93 and completed files 8.2/8/93- Complete Caldwell survey 1300 2/22/93 (approx. 42 sites ) . Survey Lake Burlington (approx. 13 sites ) Survey Mebane quad (approx. 29 ) Survey Bynum quad (approx. 1 site) 9 .2/22/9.3- . Caldwell entries and completed 1300 3%8/93 files 10 .3/8/93- Survey Cedar Grove quad 1300 3/22/93 (approx. 80 sites ) 11 .3/22/93- Caldwell, Lake Burlington, } B op 4/5/93 Bynum, and Mebane entries and completed files PAY PERIOD PRODUCT SALARY 12.4/5/93- Survey Cedar Grove Quad 1300 4/19/93 (approx. 70 sites) 13.4/19/93- Cedar Grove entries and $1300 5/3/93 completed files 14 .5/3/93- Complete White Cross Quad 1300 5/17/93 (57 Sites ) , survey Saxapahaw (approx. 30 sites ) , survey Efland (approx. 40 sites ) 15 . 5/17/93- Draft of Survey Report 1300 5/31 /93 16. 5/31 /93- Cedar Grove entries and 1300 6/14/93 completed files 17. 6/14/93- Entries and completed files 1300 6/28/93 for White Cross and Saxapahaw 18 . 6/28/93- Final survey report, 2600 7/26/93 Index, and Study List $27, 500 Jody Carter Todd Peck APPENDIX for SUBGRANT AGREEMENTS The following stipulations apply to all subgrant projects funded in part by federal Historic Preservation Fund ( HPF ) monies awarded to the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources , Division of Archives and History , State Historic Preservation Office ( HPO ) , by the U . S . Department of the Interior , National Park Service . Questions about the application of these conditions to specific projects are available from the HPO specialists assigned to subgrant projects or from Lloyd D . Childers , Grants Administrator , State Historic Preservation Office , 109 East Jones Street , Raleigh , NC 27601-2807 . Telephone: ( 919 ) 733-4763 , FAX : ( 919 ) 733-8653 . 1 . PROCUREMENT: Subgrantees must forward to the HPO evidence of compliance with Federal competitive procurement requirements for professional services and subcontracts prior to reimbursement , if applicable . 2 . RETENTION OF RECORDS: Acceptable federal and nonfederal share supporting documentation must be submitted prior to reimbursement , if applicable . Documentation includes : copies of contract , timesheets , front and back of canceled checks ( or computer printouts ) , invoices , etc . 3 . 'CHANGES IN SCOPE: The approved scope of work , products , budget and performance/reporting milestones included in the contract cannot be changed without prior written approval . from the HPO . 4 . LOBBYING PROHIBITED: Subgrantees must conform with the following text of 18 U .S .C . 1913 , which prohibits the use of the subgrant funds for lobbying : No part of the money appropriated by any enactment. of Congress Shall , in the absence of express authorization by Congress, be used directly or indirectly to pay for any personal service, advertisement., -t.elegram, telephone, letter , printed or written matter , or other device, intended or designated to influence in any manner a Member of Congress, to favor or oppose by vote or otherwise, any legislation or appro priation by Congress, whether before or after the introduction of any bill or resolution proposing such legislation or appropriation; but this shall not prevent officers or employees of the United States or its Depart.ment or agencies from communication to Members of Congress on the request of any Member or to Congress, through the proper official channels, requests for legislation or appropriations which they deem necessary for the efficient conduct of the public business_ Appendix for Agreement Page 2 5 . NONFEDERAL AUDIT: Subgrantees are responsible for obtaining audits in accordance with the Single Audit. Act. of 1984 for State or local governments , or the audit requirements of DMB Circular A-110 for universities and nonprofit organizations . The audits shall be made by an independent auditor in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards covering financial and compliance audits . 6 . PUBLICATIONS: Acknowledgment of federal grant assistance should be made in connection with the publication of any material based on , or developed under , any activity supported by HPF grant funds , as follows : The activity that is the subject of this ( type of publication) has been financed (in part./entirely) with federal funds from the National Park Service, Depart.merrt of the Interior . However , the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior , nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior . NOTE: The design and content of any publication produced from a survey of architectural or archaeological resources must be reviewed and approved by the HPO prior to its printing . 7 . :SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF SUBGRANT: Voluntary and involuntary suspension or termination of the subgrant , in Whole or in part , by either the State or subgrantee may occur at any time prior to the date of project completion . 8 . STANDARDS FOR FINAL PRODUCTS: Final products which do not conform to the terms and conditions of the grant agreement or which do not meet the applicable Secretary of the Interior 's "Standards" will not be reimbursed . 9 . EQUAL OPPORTUNITY: Subgrantee must comply with Title VI of. the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 . 10 . OTHER REQUIREMENTS: In addition to the terms detailed in this Subgrant Agreement , all federal requirements governing grants are applicable . ( Office of Management and Budget Circulars A-87 or A-121 , A-102 or A-110 , and A-128 ) Attachment 7 Historic Preservation Commission Member Resumes RESUME FORM FOR MEMBERS OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES AND DISTRICT COMMISSIONS (to be filled out by each member of the commission) 5/21/91 Reappointed Name: Todd W. Dickinson Date appointed to commission 2/3/92 Address: 4606 Hunt Road Term expires: 2/28/95 Hillsborough, NC 27278 Chairman? yes Vice Chairman? no yes/no yes no Telephone: 919)732-5439 Committee assignments (if any) : N/A Occupation: Historic Preservation Contractor & Consultant Please list below your personal, professional, or organizational activities related to historic preservation; use the back of this form if necessary: (These may include the following: restoring or rehabilitating an older house or place of business; involvement in community preservation organizations, historical societies, or other groups working to promote historic preservation, such as appearance commissions, planning boards, arts councils, or downtown revitalization committees; involvement in historic preservation as a professional architect, historian, architectural historian, or archaeologist; or other activities that you believe are related to historic preservation. ) 12 years operation of Dickinson Restorations, Inc. - Restoration of or repairs to some 200+ structures. Please list any other skills, education, training, or experience that you have which you consider advantageous to your work on the historic district or properties commission: 1979 graduate Durham Tech. College Certificate Program - Historic Preservation Technology - Taught History of Building Tech. Course, D.T. I . - Lectures, etc. Have you attended any classes, workshops, or seminars on historic preservation, history, architecture, or archaeology during the past 0-5 years? If so, please list them below: Most A.P.T. annual conferences, some Pres./N.C, conferences, Greenville Pres. Comm. Workshop - Spring, 1992 sponsored by Tres./N.U. What topics for seminars or workshops would most interest you or be most helpful to your work as a commission member? Ways to involve & communicate with community and interest public in preservation. RESUME FORM FOR MEMBERS OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES AND DISTRICT COMMISSIONS (to be filled out by each member of the commission) Name: H. Trawick Ward Date appointed to commission 5/21/91 Address: 5209 Walnut Cove Rd. Term expires: 2/28/94 Chapel Hill , NC 27516 Chairman? no Vice Chairman? yes yes/no yes/no Telephone: (919) 929-8702 Committee assignments (if any) : Occupation: Archaeologist Please list below your personal, professional, or organizational activities related to historic preservation; use the back of this form if necessary: (These may include the following: restoring or rehabilitating an older house or place of business; involvement in community preservation organizations, historical societies, or other groups working to promote historic preservation, such as appearance commissions, planning boards, arts councils, or downtown revitalization committees; involvement in historic preservation as a professional architect, historian, architectural historian, or archaeologist; or other activities that you believe are related to historic preservation. ) Professional archaeologist at UNC-CH for 20 years Please list any other skills, education, training, or experience that you have which you consider advantageous to your work on the historic district or properties commission: See attached Have you attended any classes, workshops, or seminars on historic preservation, history, architecture, or archaeology during the past 0-5 years? If so, please list them below: See attached What topics for seminars or workshops would most interest you or be most helpful to your work as a commission member? Preservation legislation VITA H. Trawick Ward Research Archaeologist Research Laboratories of Anthropology University of North Carolina 108 Alumni Building CB # 3120 Chapel Hill, NC 27516-3120 (919) 962-6574 Birth Date: August 28, 1944 Degrees: B.A. , Georgia State University, 1966 M.A. , University of Missouri, 1969 Thesis: "Mississippian Influences in the Kansas City Area" Ph.D. , University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, 1980 Dissertation: "The Spatial Analysis of Plow Zone Artifact Distributions from Two Village Sites in North Carolina" Teaching and Research Positions: September 1963-June 1966 Georgia State University Archaeological Laboratory Assistant September 1966-May 1969 University of Missouri Division of North American Archaeology Archaeological Research Assistant • ' September 1969-December 1971 Psychological Operations School Institute for Military Assistance, U.S. Army Cultural Anthropology Instructor September 1970-June 1971 North Carolina State University, Fort Bragg Extension Anthropology Instructor (Part-time) June 1972-August 1973 University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Research Laboratories of Anthropology Archaeological Research Assistant September 1981-May 1982 University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Division of Extension and Continuing Education Anthropology Instructor (Part-time) August 1973-Present University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Research Laboratories of Anthropology Staff Archaeologist II, 1973-1988 Research Archaeologist, 1988-Present Research and Teaching Interests: Archaeology and Ethnohistory of Southeastern Indians, Spatial Analysis, Mortuary Behavior, Culture Change and Acculturation, Archaeological Field Methods and Site Formation Processes Courses Taught: Introduction to Society and Culture, Group Dynamics, Introduction to Anthropology, The Prehistory of North Carolina, Principles of Archaeology, Field Methods in Archaeology Professional Memberships: Society for American Archaeology Southeastern Archaeological Conference North Carolina Archaeological Council North Carolina Archaeological Society Proposal Reviewer for: National Science Foundation National Geographic Society Earthwatch North Carolina Division of Archives and History • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Consultant For: Carolina Power and Light Company Duke University Piedmont Bioregional Institute Hazen and Sawyer, P.C. Finkbeiner, Pettis and Strout, Ltd. Southwestern N.C. Planning and Economic Development Commission W.M. Piatt and Company Olsen and Associates Major Grants and Contracts: Department of Interior-National Park Service, contract for $10,000 for "Archaeological Tests at Guilford Courthouse National Military Park," 1973 Carolina Power and Light Co. , contract for $1200 for "Archaeological Survey of the Old Sneedsboro Power Plant Complex, " 1977 Carolina Power and Light Co. , contract for $4000 for "Archaeological Survey of the SC-86 Reservoir, Marlboro Co. , S.C. , " 1978 Interagency Archaeological Services, contract for $19,000 for "Salvage Excavations at the Cold Morning Site, New Hanover Co. , N.C. , " 1979 Carolina Power and Light Co. , contract for $3200 for " Archaeological Survey of the Harris-Asheboro 230 Kv Transmission Line, " 1984 National Geographic Society, grant for $30,000 for "The Historic Occaneechi: An Archaeological Investigation of Culture Change, " 1984- 1986 (with R.S. Dickens, Jr. and R.P.S. Davis, Jr. ) National Science Foundation, grant for $160,000 for "The Siouan Project, An Investigation of Culture Change on the N.C. Piedmont, " 1986-1989 (with R.P.S. Davis, Jr. ) Major Publications: Books Structure and Process in Southeastern Archaeology_ (edited with Roy S. Dickens, Jr. ) , University of Alabama Press, 1985, 347 pp. Monographs Mississippian Influence in the Kansas City Area. MA thesis, Department Of Anthropology, University of Missouri, 1969. Preliminary Archaeological Tests at Guilford Courthouse. Submitted to the National Park Service by the Research Laboratories of Anthropology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1973, 48 pp. Archaeological Excavations at the Site of Guilford Courthouse. Submitted to the National Park Service by the Research Laboratories of Anthropology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1974, 63 pp. An Archaeological Evaluation of the Falls of the Neuse Reservoir. (with Joffre L. Coe) Submitted to the National Park Service by the Research Laboratories of Anthropology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1976, 61 pp. Archaeo-Osteological Investigations of Three Historic Cemeteries in Person County, N.C. (with Martha Graham) Submitted to the Wilmington District Corps of Engineers by the Research Laboratories of Anthropology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1978, 42 pp. The Spatial Analysis of the Plow Zone Artifact Distributions from Two Village Sites in North Carolina. Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1980, 325 pp. Archaeological and Paleo-Osteological Investigations at the Cold Morning Site, New Hanover County, North Carolina. (with Joffre Coe, Martha Graham, Liane Navey, Homes Hogue, and Jack Wilson) Submitted to the Interagency Archaeological Services, National Park Service, 1982, 92 pp. The Historic Occaneechi: An Archaeological Investigation of Culture Change: Preliminary Report of the 1984 Investigations. (with Roy S. Dickens, Jr. and R.P. Stbphen Davis, Jr. ) Submitted to the National Geographic Society by the Research Laboratories of Anthropology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1984, 58 pp. The Historic Occaneechi: An Archaeological Investigation of Culture Change: Final Report of the 1984 Investigations. (edited with Roy S. Dickens, Jr. and R.P. Stephen Davis, Jr. ) Submitted to the National Geographic Society by the Research Laboratories of Anthropology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1985, 729 pp. The Historic Occaneechi: An Archaeological Investigation of Culture Change: Preliminary Report of the 1985 Investigations. (with Roy S. Dickens, Jr. and R.P. Stephen Davis, Jr. ) Submitted to the National Geographic Society by the Research Laboratories of Anthropology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1985, 36 pp. The Historic Occaneechi: An Archaeological Investigation of Culture Change: Final Report of the 1985 Investigations. (with Roy S. Dickens, Jr. and R.P. Stephen Davis, Jr. ) Submitted to the National Geographic Society by the Research Laboratories of Anthropology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1986, 155 pp. The Historic Occaneechi: An Archaeological Investigation of Culture Change: Preliminary Report of the 1986 Investigations. (with R.P. Stephen Davis, Jr. ) Submitted to the National Geographic Society by the Research Laboratories of Anthropology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1986, 41 pp. The Historic Occaneechi: An Archaeological Investigation of Culture Change: Final Report of the 1986 Investigations. (edited with R.P. Stephen Davis, Jr. ) Submitted to the National Geographic Society by the Research Laboratories of Anthropology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1986, 171 pp. The Siouan Project: Seasons I and II. (edited with Roy S. Dickens, Jr. and R.P. Stephen Davis, Jr. ) Monograph Series No. 1, Research Laboratories of Anthropology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1987, 308 pp. Archaeology of the Historic Occaneechi Indians. (edited with R.P. Stephen Davis, Jr. ) Southern Indian Studies Vols. XXXVI-XXXVII, 1988, 128 pp. Indian Communities on the North Carolina Piedmont, A.D. 1000- 1700. (with R.P. Stephen Davis, Jr. ) Monograph Series No. 2, Research Laboratories of Anthropology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, in press. Book and Monograph Chapters "A Review of Archaeology in the North Carolina Piedmont: A Study of. Change. " In The Prehistory of North Carolina, An Archaeological Symposium, edited by Mark Mathis and Jeffrey Crow, North Carolina Division of Archives and History, 1983, pp. 53-81. "Introduction. " (with Roy S. Dickens, Jr. ) In Structure and Process in Southeastern Archaeology, edited by Roy S. Dickens, Jr. and H. Trawick Ward, University of Alabama Press, 1985, pp. 1-7. "Social Implications of Storage and Disposal Patterns. " In Structure and Process in Southeastern Archaeology, edited by Roy S. Dickens, Jr. and H. Trawick Ward, University of Alabama Press, 1985, pp. 82-101. "Mortuary Patterns at the Fredricks, Wall and Mitchum sites. " In The Siouan Project: Seasons I and II, edited by Roy S. Dickens, Jr. , H. Trawick Ward, and R.P. Stephen Davis, Jr. , 1987, pp. 81-110. Articles "Correlation of Mississippian Sites and Soil Types. " Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin, Vol. 3, 1965, pp. 42-46. "Flycatcher Village: A Nonpottery Village Site in the Stockton Reservoir, Missouri. " (with Rolland E. Pangborn and W. Raymond Wood) Plains Anthropologist, Vol. 16, 1971, pp. 64-73. "The Use of Soil Science at a South Carolina Thom's Creek Culture Shell Ring." (with Michael B. Trinkley) Florida Anthropologist, Vol. 31, 1978, pp. 64-73. "Trend Surfaces and the Delineation of Disturbed and in situ Site Structure: Two examples from North Carolina." Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin, Vol. 23, 1980, pp. 4-8. "Excavations at the Cold Morning Site. " (with Jack H. Wilson, Jr. ) Southern Indian Studies, Vol. 32, 1980, pp. 5-40. "Digging into North Carolina's Past." (with R.P. Stephen Davis, Jr. ) Endeavors, Vol. 1, 1984, pp. 12-15. "Intra-site Spatial Patterns at the Warren Wilson Site. " In A Conference on Cherokee Prehistory, Complied by David G. Moore. Warren Wilson College, 1987, pp. 7-19. "Obituary of Roy Selmans Dickens, Jr." (with R.P. Stephen Davis, Jr. ) American Antiquity, Vol 53, 1988, pp. 227-230. "Obituary of Richard Pleasants Gravely, Jr. " (with R.P. Stephen Davis, Jr. ) Southern Indian Studies, Vol. 38, 1989, pp. 1-5. "The Bull in the North Carolina Buffalo. " Southern Indian Studies, Vol. 39, 1990, pp. 19-30. "The Evolution of Siouan Communities in Piedmont North Carolina." (with R.P. Stephen Davis, Jr. ) Southeastern Archaeology, Vol. 10, 1991, pp. 40-53. "The Impact of Old World Diseases on the Native Inhabitants of the North Carolina Piedmont. " (with R.P. Stephen Davis, Jr. ) Archaeology of Eastern North America, Vol. 19 (in press) . Contract Reports I have written approximately 100 contract reports dealing with North Carolina environmental assessment projects since 1973. These are listed in the North Carolina Archaeological Council, Publication Nos. 13, 14, 17, 21, and 23 available at the Office of State Archaeology, North Carolina Division of Archives and History, Raleigh. Papers Presented at Professional Meetings "Correlation of Mississippian Sites and Soil Types. " Paper presented at the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Archaeological Conference, New Orleans, 1964. "Trend Surfaces and the Delineation of Disturbed and In Situ Site Structure: Two Examples from North Carolina. " Paper presented at the 36th Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Atlanta, 1979. "A Review of Archaeology on the North Carolina Piedmont: A Study of Change." Paper presented at the first Archaeological Symposium on the Prehistory of North Carolina, Raleigh, 1980 "Social Implications of Site Formation in the Carolina Piedmont: Fact and Fancy." Paper presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Asheville, 1981. "The Spatial Dimension of Siouan Mortuary Ritual: Implications for Studies of Change. " Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Historical Archaeology, Williamsburg, 1984. "Cultural Dynamics in the Late Prehistoric and Historic Periods on the North Carolina Piedmont: Symposium Introduction. " (with Roy S. Dickens, Jr. and R.P. Davis, Jr. ) Paper presented at the 51st Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, New Orleans, 1986. "Mortuary Behavior, Human Skeletal Remains, and Culture Change in the North Carolina Piedmont. " (with Holmes H. Wilson) Paper presented at the 51st Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, New Orleans, 1986. "An Archaeological Investigation of Culture Change at a Late Seventeenth Century Indian Village in the North Carolina Piedmont. " (with R.P. Stephen Davis, Jr. ) Paper presented at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Nashville, 1986. "A Comparison of Plowzone and In Situ Site Structure at the Fredricks Site, a Siouan Village in Piedmont North Carolina. " (with R.P. Stephen Davis, Jr. ) Paper presented at the 44th Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Charleston, 1987. "Diversity and Change in Community Pattern Among Late Prehistoric and Historic Siouan Tribes in Piedmont North Carolina. " (with R.P. Stephen Davis, Jr. ) Paper presented at the 21st Annual Chacmool Conference, University of Calgary, Alberta, 1988. "Traders and Tribes in the 17th Century North Carolina Piedmont. " (with R.P. Stephen Davis, Jr. ) Paper presented at a symposium entitled "Seventeenth Century North Carolina: The Origins of a State, " University of North Carolina at Wilmington, 1989. "The Impact of Old World Diseases on the Native Inhabitants of the North Carolina Piedmont." (with R.P. Stephen Davis, Jr. ) Paper presented at the 46th Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Tampa, 1989. "The Evolution of Siouan Communities in Piedmont North Carolina. " (with R.P. Stephen Davis, Jr. ) Paper presented at the 46th Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Tampa, 1989. "The Occaneechi and Their Role as Middlemen in the Seventeenth Century Virginia-North Carolina Trade' Network. " (with R.P. Stephen Davis, Jr. ) Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Historical Archaeology, Richmond, 1991. "Contact and Cataclysm: The Carolina Piedmont Case. " (with R.P. Stephen Davis, Jr. ) Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Historical Archaeology, Richmond, 1991. RESUME FORM FOR MEMBERS OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES AND DISTRICT COMMISSIONS (to be filled out by each member of the commission) Name: Patricia S. Dickinson Date appointed to commission 5/21/91 Address: 4606 Hunt Road Term expires: 3/30/93 Hillsborough, NC 27278 Chairman? no Vice Chairman? no yes/no yes no Telephone: (919) 732-5439 Committee assignments (if any) : N/A Occupation: Architectural historian/historic preservation consultant Please list below your personal, professional, or organizational activities related to historic preservation; use the back of this form if necessary: (These may include the following: restoring or rehabilitating an older house or place of business; involvement in community preservation organizations, historical societies, or other groups working to promote historic preservation, such as appearance commissions, planning boards, arts councils, or downtown revitalization committees; involvement in historic preservation as a professional architect, historian, architectural historian, or archaeologist; or other activities that you believe are related to historic preservation. ) Please see attached resume Please list any other skills, education, training, or experience that you have which you consider advantageous to your work on the historic district or properties commission: Please see attached resume • Have you attended any classes, workshops, or seminars on historic preservation, history, architecture, or archaeology during the past 0-5 years? If so, please list them below: See resume Annual attendance Preservation/North Carolina preservation education workshops Spring, 1992 Greenville, NC Pres./N.C, Preservation Commissions workshop What topics for seminars or workshops would most interest you or be most helpful to your work as a commission member? Legal aspects of historic landmark designation PATRICIA S. DICKINSON 460E fli's<H ' Row HILLSBOROUGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27278 19191 732-5439 RESUME RESEARCH/WRITING Historic Preservation Consultant, 197.9 to present, specializing in preparation of National Register of Historic Places nominations, on-site architectural analysis, architectural inventories, and archival research; projects commissioned by various preservation societies and organizations, Historic District/Properties Commissions, City/County planning departments, N. C. Division of Archives and History, and private individuals. National Register nominations, architectural inventories, or reports completed for buildings and districts in the following North Carolina counties: Alamance County: Bellemont Mill Village Historic District; Cedarock Park Historic District; Sunny Side; Kernodle-Pickett House; Spring Meeting House. Update of Alamance County Architectural Heritage; architectural survey concentrating on rural portions of the county. Advisor to Alamance County Historic Properties Commission on local designation ordinance. Analysis of Alamance County log buildings, resulting in a National Register Multiple Properties Documentation Form (MPDF) ,with registration requirements for log buildings; National Register nominations for seven log buildings in Alamance accompanied this MPDF. Duplin County: Robert Dickson Farm. Durham County: Ephphatha Church; Stanford L. Warren Library; W.T. O 'Brien House; West Point on the Eno Historic District; Duke University--West Campus Historic District; Duke Memorial Methodist Church; Trinity College (Duke University) Faculty Row Houses ;_ Watts .Hospital (historical essay) ; Fairntosh, Stagville and Snow Hill plantations ( survey and inventory, architectural resources ) ; Bartlett Mangum House; Adolphus W. Umstead House; Richard D. Blacknall House. Granville County: Red Hill Plantation. Guilford County: North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University Historic District. Nash County: Dr. Franklin Hart Farm. Page 2 Patricia S. Dickinson Orange County: Thomas F. Lloyd Historic District (Carrboro) ; Carrboro Commercial Historic District; survey and inventory of three Carrboro residential areas and preparation of preservation report with recommendations on local historic district zoning. Person County: Roxboro Commercial Historic District. Robeson County: Lumberton Commercial Historic District. Rockingham County: Central Leaksville Historic District; Leaksville Commercial District; Boone Road Historic District (all in Eden, N. C. ) . Rowan County: Railroad Corridor Historic District ( Salisbury) ; Grimes Roller Mill and China Grove Roller Mill (architectural descriptions ) . Surry County: Mt. Airy Historic District; E.H. Hennis House; W.A. Moore House. Union County: Waxhaw Historic District. EDITING AND PUBLICATIONS Consulting Editor, Davidson County (N. C. ) architectural and historic inventory publication (1985 ) . Consulting Editor, Union County (N. C. ) architectural and historical inventory publication (1985 ) . Production Editor and co-author, Badin: A Town at the Narrows, (Stanly County, N.C. Historic Properties Commission, 1982 ) . Editor, An Inventory of the Cleveland-Holloway Street Neighborhood, (Durham Technical Institute, 1980) . Co-Editor and author of historical essay, An Inventory of Edgemont and East Durham, Early Textile Mill Villages , (Durham Technical Institute, 1979 ) . Editor, "Master Restoration Plan: Pegram House" (Urban Housing Systems, Durham, N. C. . 1979 ) . • Page 3 Patricia S. Dickinson TEACHING • Fall Quarter, 1980. Instructor, "Introduction to Historic Preservation, " Durham Technical Institute, Historic Preservation Technology curriculum. Classroom instruction in architectural history, preservation history, adaptive reuse, preservation legislation. Winter and Spring Quarters, 1980. Instructor, "Recording Historic Sites I & II, " Durham Technical Institute. Classroom instruction in architectural descriptive writing and field work supervision of student survey and inventory of early 20th century Durham neighborhood. Lecturer, National Register Symposium, Asheville, N. C. , 1986, "The History of the National Register. " Conference sponsored by the Historic Preservation Foundation of North Carolina and The Preservation Society of Asheville and Buncombe County. Lecture, "National Register Update, " Chapel Hill Preservation Society, 1989 VOLUNTEER WORK AND AFFILIATIONS Orange County Historic Preservation Commission: Member, term 1991-1993. The Historic Preservation Foundation of North Carolina, Inc. : Board of Directors, 1986-1992; Chairman, Education Committee, 1988-1989 ; Chairman, Awards Committee, 1985 and 1992; Secretary, Board of Advisors, 1985-1986; Board of Advisors, 1982-1985 ; Region J Representative to Awards Committee, 1982. The Historic Preservation Society of Durham: Board of Trustees, 1989-1992; President, 1987; First Vice-President, 1986; Recording Secretary, 1985; Historian, 1984 . Member: National Trust for Historic Preservation; Vernacular Architecture Forum; Society for Commercial Archeology; Historic Preservation Foundation of North Carolina, Inc. ; Historic Preservation Society of Durham; Friends of Stagville Preservation Center; Southern Garden History Society; Hillsborough Historical Society. Page 4 Patricia S. Dickinson EDUCATION Duke University, B.A. , 1972; Durham Technical Community College, Certificate, Historic Preservation Technology, 1979; North Carolina Real Estate Broker ' s License, 1982 . References and writing sample available upon request. RESUME FORM FOR MEMBERS OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES AND DISTRICT COMMISSIONS (to be filled out by each member of the commission) Name: Jean B. Anderson Date appointed to commission `5/21/91 Address: 5301 Cabe Ford Road Term expires: 3/30/93 Durham, NC 27705 Chairman? no Vice Chairman? no yes/no yes/no Telephone: (919) 383-2244 Committee assignments (if any) : Occupation: historian, free lance researcher and writer Please list below your personal, professional, or organizational activities related to historic preservation; use the back of this form if necessary: (These may include the following: restoring or rehabilitating an older house or place of business; involvement in community preservation organizations, historical societies, or other groups working to promote historic preservation, such as appearance commissions, planning boards, arts councils, or downtown revitalization committees; involvement in historic preservation as a professional architect, historian, architectural historian, or archaeologist; or other activities that you believe are related to historic preservation. ) On board of directors of Stagville Corporation, publications committee of Historic Preservation Society of Durham, on board of Hillsborough Preservation Fund, member of Historical Society of N.C. , Hillsborough Historical Society, N.C.Lit. & Hist. Soc. , Southern Historical Assn. Please list any other skills, education, training, or experience that you have which you consider advantageous to your work on the historic district or properties commission: Local historian, author of 3 books , working on a 4th Have you attended any classes, workshops, or seminars on historic preservation, history, architecture, or archaeology during the past 0-5 years? If so, please list them below: Certified Local Government workshop, 21 March 1992 What topics for seminars or workshops would most interest you or be most helpful to your work as a commission member? N.C . Architectural History: log as well as frame RESUME FORM FOR MEMBERS OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES AND DISTRICT COMMISSIONS • (to be filled out by each member of the commission) Name: Norma B. White 5/21/91 Date appointed to commission Address: 4901 Schley Road Term expires: 2/28/94 Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 No No Chairman? Vice Chairman? yes/no yes/no Telephone: (919) 732-8528 — Work Committee assignments (if any) : • Occupation: Landscape. Designer; Land Use Planner. Please list below your personal, professional, or organizational activities related to historic preservation; use the back of this form if necessary: (These may include the following: restoring or rehabilitating an older house or place of business; involvement in community preservation organizations, historical societies, or other groups working to promote historic preservation, such as appearance commissions , planning boards, arts councils, or downtown revitalization committees; involvement in historic preservation as a professional architect, historian, architectural historian, or archaeologist; or other activities that you believe are related to historic preservation. ) See attached sheets . Please list any other skills , education, training, or experience that you have which you consider advantageous to your work on the historic district or properties commission: Master' s Degree in Landscape Architecture Have you attended any classes, workshops, or seminars on historic preservation, history, architecture, or archaeology during the past 0-5 years? If so, please list them below: What topics for seminars or workshops would most interest you or be most helpful to your work as a commission member? ATTACHMENT - NORMA B. WHITE RESUME Land design/construction documents for Court House Square renovation, Hillsborough, N.C. , a National Register landmark. Member of Tree Board, Hillsborough, N.C. [founding member] Member of Hillsborough, N.C. Appearance Commission Landscape design/construction documents for Orange County Governmental Services Building located within Hillsborough Historic District Landscape plans for private residence, church, commercial building, and parking lot, all located within Historic District Member of the [Burwell School] Historic Hillsborough Commission appointed by the Governor; school is National Register landmark. Consultant and landscape designer for Hillsborough Town Hall renovation, a National Register landmark [John Williams, Architect] . -N . B . White and Associates is a land-use planning and design firm serving commercial, residential, and institutional clients. Our associates hold Masters Degrees in Landscape Architecture, a broad discipline that applies multiple design skills to the use and management of the land. We work to enrich the developing landscape and adapt its structure to meet the needs of people. Our company offers a full range of services N. B.WHITE &ASSOCIATES, INC. including: • Site analysis and evaluation. COMMERCIAL/INSTITUTIONAL/RESIDENTIAL • Land use /site planning. LAND USE PLANNING AND DESIGN • Landscape and planting design. • Communication with governing bodies. • Construction documents&specifications. • On-site observation during construction. • Post-construction evaluation. • Consulting. N. B. White & Associates' policy of open communication with our clients, other involved parties, and local officials helps to avoid unnecessary delays and costly mistakes. Our ability to evaluate existing and future site conditions and user needs further contributes to finding solutions in an efficient manner. Other professionals such as architects, engineers, horticulturalists, and planners are called in when needed to ensure a quality product for our clients at a reasonable cost. As consultants we provide evaluations and recommendations on either a written or oral basis depending upon our clients' needs. Our goal is to solve problems from aesthetics to N.B. White &Assoc., Inc. zoning code requirements responsibly, through 228 S. Churton Street effective and creative planning for our use of Hillsborough, N.C.27278 the land. (919) 732-8528 COMMERCIAL/INSTTTUTIONAL PROTECTS Wilmore Electronics, 1987. United Carolina Bank, 1989.* Orange Count Government Services Building, Yanceyville, N.C. Landscape master plan $ y g, for a new industrial facility. Hillsborough, N.C. Master landscape plan 1990.* for a difficult hillside site. Hillsborough, N.C., Historic District;Parking Lot, 1987.* Hillsborough, N.C., Historic District. Hillsborough United Methodist Church, 1989.* Collaboration with the Hakan & Corley Hillsborough, N.C., Historic District. architectural/engineering firm providing a Parking layout, landscape design, and master landscape plan, parking plan, and seating area to complement the commercial Master plan and construction documents to construction documents for this $3.2 million complement this historic church building. downtown area. Consulted on construction. p building project. Hillsborough Savings &Loan Building, 1987.* Starpoint Storage Facility, 1989. Harbor Bay Seafood Restaurant, 1991. Hillsborough, N.C. Landscape plans.for a Chapel Hill, N.C. Landscape plan to meet Orange County Zoning requirements. Durham,N.C. Site plan and documentation site at a major commercial intersection. for expansion to meet Orange County's zoning Old Piedmont Electric Building, 1987.* Pizzeria Uno Restaurant &Bar, 1989. requirements. Hillsborough, N.C., Historic District. Raleigh, Charlotte, and Asheville, N.C. Duke School for Children,Middle School, 1992. Collaborated with the Lucy Carol Davis Landscape plans for three commercial sites. Durham, N.C. Stormwa ter management architectural firm to convert an electric Orange County Historical Museum, 1989.* plan for private school campus. utilities building and storage site to legal Hillsborough, N.C., Historic District. offices. Provided master planning, parking Consultant for the Orange County Historical layout, grading and drainage plans, Society regarding drainage and landscape SUBDIVISIONS walkways, and landscape plans which problems on the museum site. Construction integrated the site into the existing documents and planting plans provided. Gatemore, 1986. Hillsborough, N.C. residential neighborhood. The Country, 1987. Caldwell, N.C. Orange County Public Library,1989. Dark Hills, 1987. Cedar Grove,N.C. Chi Omega House Sorority, 1988. Hillsborough, N.C., Historic District Fendt Meadows, 1988. Hillsborough, N.C. Chapel Hill, N.C. Planning to unify Landscape plan for entrance-way. Stratford Green, 1988. Hillsborough, N.C. buildings and solve entrance-way problems. Il * Provided landscape plans to comply with untboard Antiques, 1989. p p Y Old Orange County Courthouse, 1988.* Hillsborough, N.C., Historic District. Orange County subdivision regulations. Hillsborough, N.C., Historic District. Raised brick planter and eye catching Collaboration with town and county planting design for a cotnmercial building on representatives produced a master plan for a busy corner in the downtown commercial PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL CLIENTS the renovation of this landmark historic area. Over the years N. B.White and Associates site. The firm also furnished construction Kin has enhanced the usefulness and elegance of drawings. gsdown Mattress Company, 1990.Mebane, N.C. Master landscape plan for a outdoor spaces through solutions tailored to Dillard's Barbecue Restaurant, 1989. two block industrial site, our clients' needs. Our projects have Durham, N.C. Landscape plan to meet included decks, patios, parking areas and Durham County landscape requirements. Shannon Hills Shopping Center, 1990.* d r.i veways, walls, walks, fences, and Hillsborough, N.C. Consultant to Spang planting plans. We also regularly address Development company. Master landscape stormwater management and drainage * Indicates that N. B. White and Associates plan for a new shopping center. problems, and advise on construction and represented the client in the review process planting techniques. References are before the required governing boards, available upon request. commissions,and planning departments. RESUME FORM FOR MEMBERS OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES AND DISTRICT COMMISSIONS (to be filled out by each member of the commission) Name: Jeff Peloquin Date appointed to commission 6/25/91 Address: 3212 Twin Streams Road Term expires: 6/30/94 Chapel Hill, N.C. 27516 Chairman? No Vice Chairman? NO yes/no yes/no Telephone: (919) 967-9859 Committee assignments (if any) : Occupation: Licensed Building Contractor Please list below your personal, professional, or organizational activities related to historic preservation; use the back of this form if necessary: (These may include the following: restoring or rehabilitating an older house or place of business; involvement in community preservation organizations, historical societies, or other groups working to promote historic preservation, such as appearance commissions, planning boards, arts councils, or downtown revitalization committees; involvement in historic preservation as a professional architect, historian, architectural historian, or archaeologist; or other activities that you believe are related to historic preservation.) Bingham Township Advisory Council (Advisory to Planning Board) Active in local church and have spent time researching history of church from an institutional and architectural viewpoint Please list any other skills, education, training, or experience that you have which you consider advantageous to your work on the historic district or properties commission: Building contractor; developer of small subdivisions - As part of the latter, I have sought to preserve environmentally sensitive areas. Have you attended any classes, workshops, or seminars on historic preservation, history, architecture, or archaeology during the past 0-5 years? If so, please list them below: • What topics for seminars or workshops would most interest you or be most helpful to your work as a commission member? RESUME FORM FOR MEMBERS OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES AND DISTRICT COMMISSIONS (to be filled out by each member of the commission) Name: Carl B. Lloyd Date appointed to commission 9/22/92 Address: 1600 Holly Creek Lane Term expires: 3/30/95 Chapel Hill, N.C. 27516 Chairman? No Vice Chairman? No yes/no yes/no Telephone: (919) 929-0148 Committee assignments (if any) : Occupation: Insurance Agent/Farmer Please list below your personal, professional, or organizational activities related to historic preservation; use the back of this form if necessary: (These may include the following: restoring or rehabilitating an older house or place of business; involvement in community preservation organizations, historical societies, or other groups working to promote historic preservation, such as appearance commissions, planning boards, arts councils, or downtown revitalization committees; involvement in historic preservation as a professional architect, historian, architectural historian, or archaeologist; or other activities that you believe are related to historic preservation. ) Active in Antioch Baptist Church; particular interest in history of Orange County as related to Lloyd and Durham families. Please list any other skills, education, training, or experience that you have which you consider advantageous to your work on the historic district or properties commission: - Knowledge of rural portion of southwestern Orange County and farm community. Have you attended any classes, workshops, or seminars on historic preservation, history, architecture, or archaeology during the past 0-5 years? If so, please list them below: What topics for seminars or workshops would most interest you or be most helpful to your work as a commission member? Attachment 8 Historic Preservation Commission - Evidence of Expertise Note: See Attachment 6.