HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 01-04-1993 - VII-C 1
ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Action Agenda
Item No V1S- °C.
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: January 4, 1993
SUBJECT: Solid Waste Management Goals
DEPARTMENT County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING YES NO X
ATTACHMENT(S) INFORMATION CONTACT
12/8/92 Memo from Chapel Hill Don Willhoit
Solid Waste Agenda Committee
TELEPHONE NUMBER
Hillsborough 732-8181
Chapel Hill 968-4501
Mebane 227-2031
Durham 688-7331
PURPOSE: To receive information about the development of solid waste
management goals.
BACKGROUND: The local governments that comprise the Orange Regional
Landfill Owners' Group have for some months been considering the
establishment of solid waste management goals and objectives. A
committee of three members of the Chapel Hill Town Council met and
developed, for discussion by the full Council, a set of solid waste
goals for Chapel Hill based on the goals established by the State of
North Carolina.
The consensus of the members at the most recent LOG meeting (December
16, 1992) was that each local government should develop its own set of
solid waste management goals. These would be brought to the LOG with
the intent of working out a common set of goals for the LOG. The
outcome would likely be a tiered approach with a set of goals agreed
upon by all jurisdictions, and other sets of goals pertinent to . .
specific jurisdictions.
It is suggested that comments be solicited from the Orange County Solid
Waste Committee as the County develops its set of solid waste
management goals.
RECOMMENDATION(S) : Receive as information.
2
MEMORANDUM
TO: Carrboro Board of Aldermen 1i
Orange County Commissioners � )i
Hillsborough Board of Commissioners !Jt
FROM: Chapel Hill Mayor's Solid Waste Agendl. mmittee: X21/
Joyce Brown, Mark Chilton, Alan Elmer�� J
SUBJECT: Materials Developed for Discussion for Tuesday, December
8 Chapel Hill Town Council Work Session on Solid Waste
DATE: December 8, 1992
Attached are the materials the Chapel Hill Mayor's Solid Waste
Agenda Committee has developed for the Council 's upcoming Solid
Waste Work Session to-be held at 5 : 30 pm, Tuesday, December 8 in
the Chapel Hill Town Hall, first-floor Conference Room. You are
cordially invited to attend.
The solid waste goals as well as the questions concerning LOG are
only proposed for discussion.
The goals are based on the North Carolina Recycling and Solid Waste
Management Plan developed by the Division of Solid Waste Management
and Office of Waste Reduction dated February 1992 . Additions or
changes made by our Agenda Committee are in bold and those things
we have eliminated are marked through.
The questions dealing with the Landfill Owners ' Group (LOG) • cover
a number of issues that have been raised recently by citizens and
elected officials regarding the process for dealing with solid
waste management in Orange County.
The papers that come out of the Chapel Hill Town Council work
session will be forwarded to you. We anticipate that a January
intergovernmental work session will be set to continue this work.
cc: Chapel Hill Solid Waste Reduction Committee
Cal Horton, Chapel Hill Town Manager
John Link, Orange County ,Manager
Robert Morgan, Carrboro Town Manager
Eric Swanson, Hillsborough Town Manager
•
3
C
SOLID WASTE GOALS - Y ' /
SECTION ONE - INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANNING
Goal 1 : To plan for and implement solid waste management systems
involving an integrated mixture of program components giving
priority to waste reduction. The systems should function so as to
handle solid waste in the most efficient way possible and in a
manner which is appropriate in terms of environment, public health,
cost and resource conservation. A process of evaluation for
efficiency, cost effectiveness, resource conservation,
environmental protection and public health will be established.
Goal 2 : To develop cooperative strategies to manage the waste
within a region where appropriate and consistent with local waste
reduction and cost effectiveness strategies, and that minimizes
environmental health hazards, conserves natural resources and
energy, and minimizes total costs.
Goal 3 : To develop, where necessary or efficient, new
institutional relationships To better define the relationships of
the governing bodies of Orange County in order to plan, coordinate,
implement, and regulate the programs and systems needed for
effective solid waste management..
Goal 4 : To effectively involve the public, through public
hearings, appropriate Town committees, and other means, in
integrated solid waste management planning and program development
by including the public and addressing public concerns and values
at each stage of the decision making process.
SECTION TWO - UTILIZING WASTE STREAM CHARACTERIZATION DATA
Goal 5 : To gather useful, accurate and appropriate data on the
amount and nature of the waste stream as needed to assist in the
planning of solid waste management programs and facilities .
SECTION THREE - COLLECTION, TRANSFER, AND DISPOSAL OF WASTE
Goal 6 : To ensure the provision of reasonably convenient, cost-
effective, and sanitary waste collection service to all residents,
businesses, and industry in North Carolina Chapel Hill, preferably
regular household collection from all residential . customers,
household collection or access, to staffed convenience centers
provided to all rural , customers; and adequate collection
arrangements available to all: local businesses and industry.
Goal 7 : To evaluate the potential for improved waste management
through incorporating transfer stations into the integrated waste
management system where appropriate investigating and comparing
source separation with collection and disposal technologies using
efficiency, cost, resource conservation, protection of the
environment and public health as the evaluation criteria.
4
Goal 8 : Ta- ensure that adequate , environmentally sound disposal
capacity is available in the present and ideally for the next -tee
twenty years.
Goal 9 : To undergo proactive planning, site screening, site
selection, and design of required new landfill capacity and provide
operation of existing facilities that will meet all federal, state
and local requirements and reduce the risk of environmental
degradation.
Goal 10 : To evaluate tie pete -tial for energy recovery from the
waste stream and incorporate waste to cagy tcchnelogy into
Goal 11 : To effectively reduce and eventually eliminate littering
and illegal dumping of solid waste within a local government' s
jurisdiction Chapel Hill.
SECTION FOUR - ALTERNATIVES TO DISPOSAL: SOURCE REDUCTION, REUSE,
RECYCLING AND COMPOSTING
Goal 12: To reduce the amount of North Carolina' s waste requiring
development and expansion of recycling, rcusc, and source reduction
v1. t
Through sound management practices and through the development and
expansion of source reduction, reuse, and recycling opportunities,
reduce the amount of Chapel Hill' s waste requiring disposal.
Goal 13 : To assess, develop and implement education programs ,
policies and incentives which promote source reduction and reuse
and discourage waste generation.
Goal 14 : To increase the number and types of recycling services
provided to maximize recovery of materials, while minimizing
recycling system costs.
Goal 15 : To effectively manage organic waste materials in an
environmentally sound manner which yields a useable product and
diverts a significant portion of the waste stream from disposal in
MSW facilities and cost effective manner which diverts that waste
stream from MSW facilities.
Goal 16 : Design, develop .'and implement public information,
awareness and education programs designed to increase public
awareness of the need for, and public involvement in the
implementation of source reduction, recycling and composting, and
to promote environmentally sound and cost-effective integrated
solid waste management.
•
p -F (76- q
tf 3'1' V` /-G' S
SECTION SIX - SPECIAL WASTE MANAGEMENT
Goal 17 : To evaluate and establish alternatives for the management
of materials which have been banned from landfilling or which pose
special management problems, with an emphasis on reducing the need
to handle such materials.
SECTION SEVEN - ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS
Goal 18: To budget sufficient funds to cover existing and proposed
solid waste management programs, including staffing for public
education programs, recycling, reduction, and composting programs,
etc .
Goal 19 : To determine the full costs involved in providing solid
waste management services in order to determine how to set
equitable rates which pass the cost of services on to the public
and provide the basis for enterprise fund development.
SECTION EIGHT - IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES
Goal 20 : To cvaluatc the options for assuring availability of the
waste stream fo- solid waste managcment opacity
utilization.
6
The Role of LOG
1. W hat is the purpose of the LOG?
Is it (or should It be) a solid waste utility?
II. What should the role of LOG be in decision making?
is LOG like one of our advisory Boards?
or perhaps more like OWASA?
III. How should the LOG change in light of the changes
in the nature of solid waste management and planning
since its inception?
Structure and composition of the.LOG
I. Is there a better way to resolve differences of opinion
among the three governing boards?
H Should we have more people on the LOG?
more elected officials? _
private citizens?
ex-officio town board representatives?
III. What role should Hillsborough play?
IV. Does the LOG operate efficiently in terms of staff time
and costs?
LOG Funding
I. Are the LOG's two functions at odds with one another
if the LOG's budget is dependent on waste entering
the landfill is it possible for LOG to also actively
attempt to prevent waste from entering the landfill?
do we need to split the LOG into two different boards?
Role of the LOG staff
I. What is the relationship of the town (or the county) staff to
the LOG?
IL What is the role of LOG staff in developing policy?
Odds and ends
I. How can we overcome a lack of accountability to the
public (perceived or real)?
Ii. Is the proposed new name acceptible?
is ISWAC fundamentally harder to say than LOG?
will OWASA be jealous of a new 5 letter accronym?
•