Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 01-25-1982 ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 111 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Regular Meeting 7 : 30 P .M. , Monday, January 25 , 1982 Commissioners ' Room, Orange County Courthouse Hillsborough, North Carolina A. COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD B . COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE 1. Matters on the agenda 2 . Matters not on the agenda C. MINUTES OCTOBER 26 , 1981 D. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Falls of New Hope Participatory Paving Project (SR Rs 1873-1877) Assessment Roll; a. Will the Board confirm the Assessment Roll for the Fall; of New Hope Participating Paving Project (SR 4s 1983- 1877) and direct it be delivered to the Orange County Tax Collector for collection? 2 . Request by Duke Power Company for a Planned Development Off: Institutional, Class A Special Use Permit; Rezoning 3 . Request for Class A Special Use Permit, Rezoning from �,. William C. Ford, a Planned. Development Housing Bingham Wood; E. ITEMS FOR DECISION BY THE BOARD 1. Advanced Life Support Policies & Procedures 2 . Lease Agreement JOCCA 3. Procedure for Water Resources Task Force Report Considerati 4. Consideration of Board' s February meeting schedule , 5. Consideration of a date for a public hearing on the Pro- posed Midway Airport and Industrial Park 6 . Consideration of extension of tax listing date 7 . Addition of Hickory Forest Road and Old Spring Road to State Secondary Road system. AI 00372 1. 2. 3. 4. MINUTES 5. JANUARY 25, 1982 6. 7. The Orange County Board of Commissioners met in special session 8. on Monday, January 25, 1982, at 12:00 P.M. (Noon) in the Com- 9. missioners' Room, Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North 10. Carolina. 11. Commissioners present: Chairman Richard E. Whitted, and 12. Commissioners Norman Gustaveson, Shirley E. Marshall, Norman 13. Walker and Don Willhoit. 14. The purpose of this meeting was to discuss the Efland 15. Elementary School Property. 16. Chairman Whitted provided a brief summary of the events 17. relating to the bidding process on the Efland Elementary School 18. Property. Commissioner Whitted asked the County Attorney, Mr. 19. Gledhill, if there was another upset bid would the property 20. then be returned to auction; Mr. Gledhill replied yes. 21. Several Board members said the issues were the same today 22. as they were at the special meeting on January 22, 1982 with 23. the Orange County Board of Education, i.e. , public accessibility 24. to,the recreational facilities if the property is purchased 25. by a private club (the Ru:ritan Club is the only other bidder) 26. and if the property is not sold at or near the market value 27. some sort of guarantee that the property will be offered to 28. either the County or the Board of Education for the first 29. opportunity to purchase in the event that it is no longer used 30. for recreation programs. 31. Commissioner Willhoit moved to enter an upset bid for the 32. Efland Elementary School Property in the minimum allowed by 33. law that is, $47,405) ; Commissioner Marshall seconded the motion. 34. During ensuing discussion, Commissioner Walker said this purchase, 35. if not upset and is acceptable to the Board of Education, would 36. place the County in a financial bind. Vote: Ayes, 4 (Commis- 37. sioners Whitted, Gustaveson, Marshall and Willhoit) ; noes, 1 38. (Commissioner Walker) . 39. 40. vVV /v 1. 2. 3. 4• Commissioner Gustaveson moved, seconded by Commissioner 5• Marshall, to communicate with the Board of Education the Board 6. of Commissioners' willingness to withdraw its upset bid if the 7• Board of Education would negotiate stipulations with the buyer 8. to guarantee public accessibility and a reversion clause that 9. in the event the property is no longer used for recreation the 10. County or the Board of Education would have first option to 11. purchase it. Commissioner Willhoit said the Board of Education -_ _ 12. had already indicated that it was unwilling to add stipulations. 13. Vote: Ayes, 3 (Commissioners Whitted, Gustaveson and Marshall) ; 14• noes, 2 (Commissioners Walker and Willhoit) . 15• Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner,.,0ustaveson, 16. to adjourn the meeting. Vote: Ayes, 5• noes, 0. 17. Agar. 18. Richard E. Whitted\Chairman 19. Paulette Pridgen-Pond, Clerk l`. 22. 23. �4. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38• 39. 40. 1. 00374 2. 3, MINUTES 5. JANUARY 25, 1982 6. 7. The Orange County Board of Commissioners met in regular session on 8. Monday, January 25, 1982, at 7:30 P.M. in the Superior Courtroom, Orange Q. County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina. 10. Commissioners present: Chairman Richard E. Whitted, and Commissioners 11. Norm Gustaveson, Shirley E. Marshall and Don Willhoit, 12. Commissioners absent: Commissioner Norman Walker. 13. In order to accommodate the Planning Board which was present for 14. the Public Hearings on the Special. Use Permit Requests, Chairman Whitted 15. suggested the meeting begin with Agenda Item D, the Public Hearings. 16. Planning Board rrembers present: Tam Bacon, Robert Greer, Logan Irvin, 17. John Kizer, Nancy Laszlo, Hazel Lunsford, David Shanklin, and John Wilson. Planning Board members absent: Pat Crawford, Chair, Art Cleary, 19. Alice Gordon, and Claudine Harris. 20„ D. Public Hearings 21. - 1. Falls of New Hope Participatory Paving Preliminary Assessment 22. Roll: Chairman Whitted r1 led for public comments on this Assessment 23. Roll; there were none. Chairman Whitted declared the public hearing closed 24. and said Board action would occur during the decision portion of this meeting. 2 2. Duke Power Company request for a Planned Development Office 26. Institutional, Class A Special Use Permit and rezoning: All those who 27, presented evidence were sworn by Chairman Whitted. 28. Mr. Rick Cannity presented the evidence for the Planning Departrrent; 29. he cited the location of the proposed Planned Development and presented the 30, findings of fact (those findings are on pages , of this book). Mr. 31. Cannity said the recommendation of the Planning Staff was that the request 32. of Duke Power Company for a Planned Developtrent Office Institutional and 33° Class A Special Use Permit and rezoning be granted with conditions (see pages 34. of this book for the conditions) because a preponderance of evidence 35. indicate substantial compliance with the General Standards and specific 36. rules governing that request. 37. Mr. John Kincaid, District Manager of Duke Power Company, addressed the 38. Boards; he said Duke Power had purchased the power utility in 1977 and had 39. 40. 1. OCK-.1,75' 2. 3. 4. operated in leased space since then. He said the site selected was 5. appropriate for this use. 6. Mr. Dwight Hollisfield, landscape Designer with Duke Power Company, 7. said he didn't think Duke Power should bear the entire cost of extending 8. a sewer line to the site; he said there would be low use of such lines by 9. Duke Power because it is an office. He asked that the request be approved 10, with an on-site disposal system if nothing could be worked out with the 11. large land owners who would also benefit from the sewer line extension. 12. Planning Board nember Kizer asked if Duke Power was in agreement with 13. the other conditions except the sewer line extension; Mr. Kincaid said yes. 1L.. %. 'Commissioner Marshall asked how many employees would be in the 15. building. Mr. Kincaid said between 25-30 with others in transit to other 16. sites. 17. Planning Board member Irvin asked about the parking spaces; Mr. 18. Kincaid said the spaces were adequate for employees, customers and sane 19. expansion. "O. Mr. Kincaid told Planning Board member Irvin that Duke Power planned 1 to contract with a private contractor to remove waste from Dumpsters it 22. planned to provide. 23. Mr. Kinc aid told Planning Board member Kizer that Duke Power planned 24. to store cable, wire, transformer, poles, that is, materials needed to 25. provide service, in its storage yard. 26. Mr. Hollisfield presented the landscape design to the Boards. He 27. said the design would be a strong statement about Chapel Hill. He 28. planned to plant about 5000 wildflowers and small trees to replace those 29. lost by the construction of the building. He said the plan was to be 30. "dynamic, not rigid" and to be "unostentatious" with "no violation of 31. the site." 12. Mr. William O'Brien, Duke Power Company, said the construction was 3. to be in two parts. He said the only glass would be on the south facade; 34• with low earth berms and heavy insulation. He said the impact from the 35. road would be minimal. 36. Commissioner Gustaveson asked how long the present design would be 37. used before growth demanded more space. 380 Mr. O'Brien said the growth would be internal first; that space was 39. 40. 1. 00376 2. 3, L1. built in with growth in mind. He adchd that external expansion would 5. be generally westward, away from parking areas. He said that additional 6. property was owned which was presently reserved for a substation; this 7. is not part of the special use permit request nor rezoning request. 8. Commissioner Willhoit asked if that project was dependent on the 9. facility presented here tonight. 10. Mr. Kincaid responded that the site had been chosen with an eye 11. toward future growth in that direction of Chapel Hill. He said location__ 12. of the substation at that site would eliminate the need for another 13. road/driveway to the substation as you would enter through Duke Power's driveway and then turn toward the substation site. Mr. Kincaid said 15. approximately five acres are set aside for the substation and the site 16. would lend itself well to screening. 17. Mr. Bobby Nichols asked about the footage of the proposed floor 18. area. 19. Mr. Kincaid said the figures in the plan of about 163,000 sq. feet 20. were the maximum allowed on a lot of this size. He does not foresee 21. expansion to anywhere near those sizes. He thinks Duke Power will be at 22. this site for at least 30 years with no expansion foreseen for 5-10 23. years; at that time perhaps 1,000 feet expansion. 24• Chairman Whitted asked if there were any members of the amiience 25. who wished to give evidence. 26. Ms. Emily thee was sworn. She asked where the transmission lines 27. would go for the substation. 28. Mr. Kincaid said it was uncertain at this time. He thinks the lines 29. will cross Highway 86 at Eubanks Road, about a mile north of that. He 30. said surveying for the best location had not been done yet. 31. Ms. Chee wanted to know if there would only be one tower or several. 32. Mr. Kincaid did not know; he said distance between tower varied. 33. Ms. thee wanted to know if affected property owners had been notified. 34. Mr. Kincaid was unsure. 3$. Chairman Whitted said the information on the substation was mci- dental; it is not part of this request. 37. Mr. Kincaid said Duke Power had originally planned to make it a part 38, of this request; however, plans were running behind. 39. 40. ( 1. 2. 3. With no one who wished to present further evidence, Chairman 5. Whitted declared the public hearing on Duke Power Company's request 6. for a Planned Development, Class A Special Use Permit and Rezoning 7. closed. 8. Bingham Woods Subdivision Planned Development Housing; Class 9. A Special Use Permit & Rezoning. 10. All those who addressed the Boards were sworn by Chairman 11. Whitted. 12. Mr. Rick Cannity, Planning Department, presented the evidence 13. for the Planning Department; he stated the findings of fact (see pages of this book). Mr. Cannity said the developers were 15. in agreement with the conditions except for numbers 1 and 2. The 16. Planning Staff requested the developer change his entrance to another 17. point on an unpaved road , then asked that he pave that portion of the 18. road from SR1949. The developer thinks his proposal of a chemical 19. treatment of the interior roads is sufficient. 70, Chairman Whitted told Mr. Cannity there is no White Cross Rural 1. Fire Department. 22. Commissioner Willhoit asked why the Planning Staff asked that the 23. entrance he moved. Mr. Cannity replied that there is an existing mobile 4. hare park nearby and this request would serve to lessen traffic congestion. 25. Mr. Larry Zucchino, Landscape Architect, spoke for the developer. 26. He said the goal was moderately priced housing for the area. He said the 27, developer and he prefer the original entrance way and that the request from 28. Planning that the roads inside be paved with asphalt would be prohibitive 29. in cost. He and the developer do agree with the other conditions. 30. Mr. Zucchino told Planning Board member Irvin there were two off- 31. street parking spaces per unit; and that the entire waste water treatment 32. area will be fenced as required. Although he wasn't sure of the depth of 3. the lagoon, Mr. Zucchino said further that this type of system was used over 34. the State and recognized by Triangle J COG; odor problems, he added, were 35. not anticipated if the unit was functioning properly. He said, in response 36. to Planning Board member Irvin, that a system to remove detergents was not 37. planned. 38. 39. 0. 0031'18 Planning Board member Kizer asked several questions about fire hydrants (none are planned) , the cul de sac turn arounds (about 70 feet), and if any treatment was planned for mosquitos or bugs at the lagoon. Mr. Zucchino said he didn't think any treatment was planned. That Chlorinization was planned from the lagoon to the field for spraying. Mr. Kizer then asked if the lagoon was raw sewage and if so, how were solids removed. Mr. Zucchino said the lagoon was raw sewage and there was a solid removal screen but he didn't know how it worked. Mr. Kizer then asked about . _ the elevation of the wells planned for the site and their relation to the lagoon drainage site. Mr. Zucchino responded he thought elevation of the wells was about 35'-40' above the lagoon. The lagoon is the lowest point of the:;site. Planning Board member Shanklin asked about the water quality. Mr. Zucchino said this system was designed to meet the State standards. Responding to an inquiry about roads fromCommissioner Willhoit, Mr. Zucchino said that the developer had planned 4" crush and run with a chemicni binder bUt that the Planning Staff had moved the original entrance to the site and then said the longer entrance should be paved. He said the cost of thetiaVing is twice as expensive as the treatment the developer had planned. Planning Board master Irvin had some concern about carving sites out of the woodland. Mr. Cannity said the landscaping would be kept to a minimum; that sone of the trees were twenty-five years old and the developer planned to retain all natural landscaping possible. Mr. Cannity said that an active agricultural operations was across the street from the development and the Planning Staff felt that moving a portion of the units would stop some of the dust; and that with the thirty-five units down the street (the pre-existing mobile home park) there existed a potential for a traffic problem if the original entrance was maintained. Ommissioner Willhoit encouraged the Planning Board to consider a trade off between the road requirements and the density of development planned. Chairman Whitted asked if any member of the audience wished to give evidence. Mr. James Pritchard—said he was a neighbor of Mr. Ford's ( the develop- er) and Mr. Ford did some work for him on his (Mr. Pritchard's) mobile home park. Mr. Pritchard said Mr. Ford did good work and did what he'd said he'd do. Mr. Pritchard is in favor of this request for Bingham Woods. He said 0;3 70 there is a need for this type of housing; with the high interest rates, this is good interim housing. Chairman Whitted, with no further persons wishing to speak, declared this portion of the public hearing over. Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Custaveson, to adjourn the public hearings on the Duke Power Company request and the Bing- ham Woods request until March 1, 1982, to receive the Planning Board's recomnendation. Vote: Ayes, 4; noes, 0. The Planning Board members left the meeting and the Board of Commis- sioners resumed their regular agenda. A. Board Comments Commissioner Willhoit added for consideration the Carrboro Board of Adjustment appointment. B. Comments from the Audience Ms. Josephine Barbour said she wished to speak on the Water Resources Task Force Report schedule; Mr. Charles Levi wished to address the Board about the Northern Fairview Community Development program. The County Manager, Mr. Thompson, told the Board Mr. Levi's request was being handled administratively and the Board would be informed as necessary. Mr. Levi said he was bringing this matter to the attention of the Board and asked to be heard as a matter not on the agenda. Chairman Whitted said by consent of the Board matters were added to the agenda and the Board chose to let management review the request before it cane to the Board. C. Minutes—October 26, 1981 Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Gustaveson, to approve the Minutes of October 26, 1981, as submitted. Vote: Ayes, 4; noes,0. D. 1. a. Will the Board confirm the Assessment Roll for the Falls of New Hope Participatory Paving Project (State Roads # 1873-1877)? Commissioner Willhoit moved to confirm the Assessment Roll for the Falls of New Hope Participatory Paving Project (State Roads # 1873-1877) at 9:30 P.M. and to direct the Clerk to the Board to deliver the Assessment Roll to the Tax Collector for Collection; Commissioner Gustaveson seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes, 4; noes, 0. (The Roll is on pages of this book.) 0038.0 The Clerk to the Board filed a Certificate of Mailing for the Falls of the New Hope Participatory Paving Assessment Roll (that Certificate is on page of this book) . E. Items for Board Decision 1. Advanced Life Support Policies & Procedures: Mr. Bobby Baker told the Board this manual contained policy, procedure and protocol for EMS Personnel_ Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to adopt this Advanced Life Support Manual. Vote: Ayes, 4; noes, 0. 2. Lease Agreement--JOCCA: Mr. Thompson said there were a few minor technical alterations to the lease but basically this would be the agreement. Commissioner Gustaveson moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to approve this lease agreement with JOCC1, for the Cedar Grove Building, incorporating the minor technical changes, and authorizing the Chair to sign it, with the dffective date July 1, 1982. Vote: Ayes, 4; noes, 0. The Board said it would like a status report from JOOCA on its allocation and operational costs. 3. Water Resources Task Force Report Procedures: The Board said it would like to have a work session with the Planning Board on the Water Resources Task Force Report. mr. Polatty said the Planning Board had almost finished reviewing the document and would finish on its next meeting. The Board said it would schedule the work session and than consider a date for a public hearing on the document. Ms. Barbour said the report was being circulated at Triangle J COG and she felt that since it had not been to public hearing yet such circulation was premature. 4. February Meeting Schedule: Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Gustaveson, to cancel the February 22nd meeting. Vote: Ayes, 4; noes, 0. 5. Public Hearing date--Midway Airport/Industrial Park: The Board set March 8, 1982, at 7:30 P.M. in the Superior Courtroom, Orange County Courthouse, as the date for the public hearing on the Midway Airport and Indus- trial Park. 6. Extension of Tax Listing date: Commissioner Gustaveson moved, seconded by Commissioner Whiffed, to extend the tax listing deadline to February 1, 1982, because of bad weather and the 31st of January falling this year on a Sunday. Vote: Ayes, 4; noes, 0. GO3S1 7. Addition to State Secondary System: Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Gustaveson, the addition of Hickory Forest Road and Old Spring Road to the State Secondary Road System. Vote: Ayes, 4; nces,O. 8. Carrboro Board of Adjustmert: Commissioner Willhoit moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, to name Mr. William Larimer to the Carrboro Board of Adjustment. Vote: Ayes, 4; noes, 0. The Clerk was asked to notify Carrboro and Mr. Tarimer of this action. Camissioner Gustaveson moved, seconded by Commissioner Whitted, to adjourn the Neeting. Vote: Ayes, 4; noes, 0. The Board adjourned. / 4_1111L... .fati/F. Richard . Whitted, Chair Paulette Pridgen-Pond, Clerk • BOARD 07 CCX,NISSIaS 140313.2 D-1 .2\CCICK.: 7,GFAMA ITEM ilLGTRINC-:". Item- I-Lr:E-CLN:C; DATE: 1-25..82 • Falls of New Hope Participatory Paving Project [1pL:22sItt: Planning public Marirq: x Yes . • • Attos.i-mant(s): a) Preliminary Assessment InfOrMatIOn. OCIn,-;a` Cfc: Susan Smith Roll; b) letter dated 12/1D/61 from Geoffry Gledhill to Susan Smith; c) Certificate of J Phone 732-8181 ext. 359 Mailing PURPOSE: Public hearing on the PreliMinary Assessment Roll fdr the Falls of New Hope Participatory Paving Project (SRs 1873-77). • NEED: Public input on the assessment roll filed with the Clerk to the Board which contains a tax description of each parcel of land to be assessed, the basis for the assessment, the amount assessed against each parcel of land asse,.72d, the terms of payment and the name of the owner of each parcel of land as can be ascertained from CoUnty tax records. Clerk to the Board will file a Certificate of Mailing which will certify that the notices of this public hearing and notices of individual assessments were mailed on or before January 7, 1981. . . MIP?CT: Upon confimation of the Assessment Roll for the Falls of New Hope Partici- patory Paving Project the Board can direct that the Assessment Roll be delivered to the Orange County Tax Collector for collection. RECOMMENDATION: Confirmation of the Assessment Roll. Acceptance of the Certificate of nailing offered by the Clerk. 00:134 COLEMAN, BERNHOLZ, DICKERSON, BERNHOLZ, GLEDHILL&HARGRAVE ATTORNEYS AT LAW 110 CHURTON STREET HILLSBOROUGH.N C.27278 919-7322196 919-942-8000 CHAPEL Ht Li.OFFICE SLATE 20,FRANKLIN BUILDING 137 E.FRANKLIN STREET January 28, 1982 CHAPEL HILL 14 C 27514 919929.7151 LEGAL CLINICS 1360.ROSEMARY STREET NCNB PLAZA CHAPEL HILL N C 27514 919129 0394 116 W.MAIN STREET Ms. Paulette Pridgen-Pond DURHAM.N C 27701 919.656-9631 Clerk to the Board of Commissioners ALON20 a COLEMAN.slit of Orange County 51 EvEN A.BERNHOLZ Orange County Courthouse DoNALD R DICKERSON ROGER B.BERNHOLZ 106 Margaret Lane GEOFFREY E.GLEDHILL Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 DOUGLAS HARORAVE MARTINI BERNHOLZ PATRICIA STANFORD HUNT Re: Falls of New Hope - Participating Paving Project DOuGLA5 WEER Of Counsel BONNER D.SavNER Dear Paulette: 0902.1970 Enclosed are proceedings of the Board relative to the Falls of New Hope Participating Paving Project., Please certify all copies, include a copy with the minutes of the Board for their January 25, 1982 regular meeting and provide a certified copy to Susan Smith and two certified copies to yours truly. I will deliver a copy of the . Assessment Roll to the Tax Collector and have delivered the Notice to the Durham Morning Herald for publication on February 25, 1982. With these acts, this project is finished. Please also include a copy of the confirmed assessment roll along with the enclosed proceedings of the Board with the minutes of their January 25, 1982 meeting. Very truly yours, 017, -• Gledhill GEG/jac Enclosure cc: Susan Smith (10385: 1,0 . • r The Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange, North Carolina, met in regular session in the Courtroom of the Orange County Courthouse in Hillsborough, North Carolina, the regular place of meeting, at 7:30 p.m. on January 25, 1982., Present: Commissioners Gustaveson, Marshall, Whitted and Willhoit. Absent: Commissioner Walker. ************************************************************************* The Chair announced that this was the hour and day fixed by the Board of Commissioners for the Public Hearing on the Preliminary Assessment Roll filed with the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County pursuant to the direction of the Orange County Board of Commissioners and pursuant to the Board's decision to finance the local share of the cost of paving Cascade Drive (S, R. #1873), Cedronella Drive (S. R. #1874), Falls Drive (S. It. #1875), Valinda Drive (S. R. #1876), and Celastrus Drive (S. R. #1877), in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina. The Chair also announced that the Board of Commissioners would immediately hear anyone who might wish to be heard on the Preliminary Assessment Roll. Various persons appeared and were recognized but none elected to be heard on the said Preliminary Assessment Roll. Thereupon, upon Motion of Commissioner Willhoit, seconded by Commissioner Gustaveson and carried, the Preliminary Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving Cascade Drive (S. R. #1873), Cedronella Drive (S. R. #1874), Falls Drive (S. R. #1875), Valinda Drive (S. R. #1876), and Celastrus Drive (S. R. #1877), in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina, was confirmed in toto. The vote upon confirmation of the assessment made against each Ign.388 property owner was: Ayes: Commissioner Gustaveson, Marshall, Whitted and Willhoit. Noes: none. Upon motion of Commissioner Willhoit, seconded by Commissioner Gustaveson and unanimously approved, the Clerk to the Board was directed to enter into the minutes of the Board the confirmation date, hour, and minutes, Thereupon, the Clerk to the Board entered the confirmation effective 9:30 o'clock p,m., the 25th day of January, 1982 Upon motion of Commissioner Willhoit, seconded by Commissioner Gustaveson and unanimously approved the Clerk to the Board was directed to deliver a copy of the confirmed Assessment Roll to the Orange County Tax Collector. Upon motion of Commissioner Willhoit, seconded by Commissioner Gustaveson and unanimously approved, the Orange County Tax Collector was directed to publish once, a Notice, no earlier than 20 days from the date of confirmation as herein set forth, that the Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving Cascade Drive (S. R. #1873), Cedronella Drive (S. R. #1874), Falls Drive (S. R. #1875), Valinda Drive (S. R. #1876), and Celastrus Drive (S. R. #1877), in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina, has been confirmed and that assessments may be paid without interest at any time before the expiration of 30 days from the day that the Notice is published and that if not paid within that time, all installments thereof shall bear interest in an amount equal, to the interest on past due ad valorem taxes in Orange County, The Chair directed that said Notice shall be published in the Durham Morning Herald. Said Notice shall be in substantially the following form: T-P IJj,I.1 42" • NOTICE OF CONFIRMATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE FINANCING BY ORANGE COUNTY OF THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COSTS OF PAVING CASCADE DRIVE (S. R. 01873), CEDRONELLA DRIVE (S. R. #1874), FALLS DRIVE (S. R. #1875), VALINDA DRIVE (S. R. #1876), and CELASTRUS DRIVE (S. R. #1877), LOCATED IN CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Notice is hereby given that pursuant to Article 9 of Chapter 153A of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the Board of Commissioners of Orange County has confirmed the Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving Cascade Drive (S. R. #1873), Cedronella Drive (S. R. #1874), Falls Drive (S. R. #1875), Valinda Drive (S. R. #1876), and Celastrus Drive (S. R. #1877), in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina, in toto. The specifics of any adjustment made are in the minutes of the Orange County Board of Commissioners for its meeting on January 25, 1982. The confirmed Assessment Roll reflects any adjustment. Pursuant thereto: 1. The Board of Commissioners of the County of Orange, North Carolina, met in regular session in the Courthouse in Hillsborough, North Carolina, at 7:30 p.m. on January 25, 1982. 2. The Chair announced that this was the hour and day fixed by the Board of Commissioners for the Public Hearing an the Preliminary Assessment Roll pursuant to the Board's decision to finance the local share of the cost of paving Cascade Drive (S. R. #1873), Cedronella Drive (S, R. #1874), Falls Drive (S. R. #1875), Valinda Drive (S. R. #1876), and Celastrus Drive (S. H. #1877), in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina. 3. All persons attending and wishing to be heard were recognized by _ _ 00388 the Chair and were heard. 4. The Board confirmed the Assessment Roll and directed its delivery to the Orange County Tax Collector. 5. The assessments confirmed by the Board may be paid without interest at any time before the expiration of 30 days from the date of the publication of this Notice. If not paid within this time, all installments thereof shall bear interest at the rate set for past due Orange County ad valorem taxes. John T. Homer, Tax Collector for Orange County, North Carolina I, Paulette Pridgen Pond, Cleric to the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange, North Carolina, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true —copy of so much of the proceedings of the Board of Commissioners for said County at a meeting held on January 25, 1982, as relates in any way to the confirmation of the Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving Cascade Drive (S, R. #1873), Cedronella Drive (S. R. #1874), Falls Drive (S. R. #1875), Valinda Drive (S. R. #1876), and Celastrus Drive (S. R. #1877), in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina. 3)424' Paulette Pridgen Pond, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina (SEAL) UMita; - i• ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE LCCAL SHARE OF THE COST OF PAVING CASCADE DR.V/F. (S. R. 41873) , CEDRONELLA DRIVE (S.. R. 41374) , FALLS DRIVE (S. R. 41875) , VALINDA DRIVE (S.. R. 41876) , and CELASTRUS DRIVE (S. R. 41877) , IN CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Map, Property Owners Amount of Bloc% & Mailin Address Assessment - - & Lot a .. 5 DR. WILLIAM S. AND ROBERT C. NUNN RT. 2, CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 $ 445.00 BB A 1 JOE F. MATTHEWS, JR. RT. 2, FALLS OF NEW HOPE CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445,00 aB A 2 JAMES T, MOORE RT. 2, BOX 519 CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445.00 88 A 4A JOAN W. MEADE RT. 2, BOX 519 CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445.00 BB A 5 WINSTON S:/ANN WARD • RT. 2 BOX 368-A, FALLS OF NEW HOPE CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445_00 - 8B A 6 WINSTON 5./ANN WARD RT. 2 BOX 368-A, FALLS OF NEW HOPE CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445.00 BB A 7 DAVID K./MARY JACKSON 2913 HOPE VALLEY ROAD DURHAM, N.C. 27707 445.00 88 A 8 ABE F./ELLADENE MAXWELL 238 HALLIGAN AVENUE WORTHINGTON, OH 43085 445.00 BB A 9 ABE F./ELLADENE MAXWELL 238 HALLIGAN AVENUE WORTHINGTON, CH 43085 445.00 BB A 10 JOHN W. A./JEAN FINDLAY RI, 2, BOX 514 CASCADE DRIVE CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 145,00 • - . ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COST OF PAVING CASCADE DRIVE (S. S. 41873) , CEDRONELLA DRIVE (S. R. 41874) , FALLS DRIVE (S. R. 41875) , VALINDA DRIVE (S. R. #1876) , and CELASTRUS DRIVE (S. R_ 41877) , IN CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Mao, Property Owners Amount oE Block & Mailing Address Assessment & Lot _ 38 A 11 JOHN W. A./JEAN FINDLAY RT. 2, BOX 514 CASCADE DRIVE CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 $ 445.00 313 A 12 NICHOLAS JOHN/DEBRA MARUHNICH RT. 2, BOX 513 CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445.00 88 A 13 JOHN L,S./BETTY HICKEY 2456 SEDGEFIELD DRIVE CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445.00 88 A 14 JOHN L.S./BETTY HICKEY 2456 SEDGEFIELD DRIVE CHAPEL HILL, N.C, 27514 445.00 88 A 15--- BELINDA ROSE NOVIX RT. 2, BOX 512 CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445.00 BB A 16 CAM:MINE N. JONES PRICE RT. 2, BOX 511 FALLS DRIVE CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445.00 88 A 17 FALLS OF NEW HOPE ASSOCIATION, INC. SUITE 304 123 W. FRANKLIN STREET CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445.00 BB A 13 FALLS OF NEW HOPE ASSOCIATION, INC. SUITE 304 123 N. FRANKLIN STREET 445,00 CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 38 3 1 HENRY B./ELIZABETH WATKINS P.O. BOX 2552 445.00 DURHAM, N.C. 27705 33 5 2 HENRY B,/ELIZABETH WATKINS P.O. BOX 2552 DURHAM, N.C. 27705 445.00 843 3 3 RICHARD N./RUTH FLAUGHER 1102 N. GREGSCN STREET DURHAM, N.C. 27701 445.00 " r 4.1 ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE LCCAL SHARE OF THE COST OF PAVING CASCADE DRIVE (S. R. 41573), CEDRONELLA DRIVE (S. R. 41874), FALLS DRIVE (S, R. 41875) , VALINDA DRIVE (S. P. 41876) , and CELASTRUS DRIVE (S. R. #1877) , IN CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Map, Property Owners Amount of Block, & Mailing Address Assessment & Lot BB 3 4 HENRY 5-/ELIZABETH WATKINS P.O. BOX 2552 DURHAM, N.C. 27705 $ 445.00 BB 3 5 JOHN M./CHRIST/NE A. SILVA • RT. 2 FALLS OF NEW HOPE CHAPEL HILL, N.C, 27514 445.00 BB C 1 ROBERT 0./JOHNEA KET.LFY 1708 N. ROXBORO STREET DURHAM, N.C. 27701 445.00 BB C 2 LILLIE E. JOHNSON 2406 HARWARD AVENUE DURHAM, N.C. 27700 445.00 BB C 3 ROBERT-R-.-H-EUAREVAREHla T,Ros.s- GLSS PE1.1P--ROXBORC-ROAi,-"- - _ DURHAM, N.C. 27704 445.0Cr BB C 4 ZEPHYR. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. 50X 230-D RT. 5 CHAPEL HTT,T,, N.C. 27514 445.00 BC A 1 RANDY L. JIRTZ.E/DEBORAH CROUSE 1507 BLOUNT STREET DURHAM, N.C. 27707 445.00 BC A 2 LILLIAN K. ANDREWS RT. 4 BOX 545 CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445,00 BC A 3 ROGER. ARNOLD/PATRICIA EVANS 303 BRANDYWINE ROAD CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445.00 BC A 4 WALTER T, BUHL 440 nEADCWBROOK DRIVE ADRIAN, MI. 49221 445.00 Ut);P:1? ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE LOCAL LAP.: OF THE COST OF PAVING CASCADE DRIVE (5. R. 41873) , CEDRONELLA DRIVE (S. R. 41874) , FALLS DRIVE (S. R- #1875) , VALINDA DRIVE (S. R. :.1876) , and CELASTRUS DRIVE (S.. R. 41977) , IN CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Mao, Property Owners Amount of Block, & Mailing Address Assessment & Lot BC A 5 WALTER T. HUBS, 4d0 2EADCWSROOK:DRIVE ADRIAN, MI, 49221 445.00 BC A 6 RUDOLPH Z./BRENDA HOK AT, 2, BOX 502-A CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445.00 BC A 7 RICHARD J./LOIS KNOEVEN RT. 2, FALLS DRIVE CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445.00 BC A a RICHARD J./Lois 14NUEVEN RT. 2, FALLS DRIVE CHAPEL HTLL, N.C. 27514 445.00 BC A 9 GREGORY V. SOLOVIEFF AT. 2, BOX 500 CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445,00 BC A 10 VLADIMIR/ELINOR SOLOV/EFF 63 CENTRAL AVENUE AMTV,1777,r,F, Nv 11701 445.00 BC A 11 VLADIMIR/ELINOR SOLOVIEFF 63 CENTRAL AVENUE AMITYVILLE, NY 11701 445.00 BC A 12 MAJORIE H. SIBLEY 2018 FAIRMONT ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55105 445.00 BC A 13 MAJORIE H, SIBLEY 2018 FAIRMONT ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55105 445.00 0 393' ' • b , ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR, THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COST OF PAVING CASCADE DRIVE (S. H. 41872) , CEDRONELLA DRIVE (S. R. 41874) , FALLS DRIVE (S. R. 41875) , VALINDA DRIVE (S. R. 41876) , and CELASTRUS DRIVE (S. R. 41377) , IN CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NRRTH CAROLINA Map, Property Owners Amount of Block, 6, Mailing Address Assessment Lot SC A 17 EDWARD L./DEITRA LOWDERMILK RT. 2, CELASTRUS DRIVE CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 5 445.00 9C A 19 EDWARD L,/DEITRA LOWDERMILK RT. 2, CELASTRUS DRIVE CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445.00 3C A 20 STEPHEN R. QUINT 133 CELASTRUS DRIVE CHAPEL HILL, N,C. 27514 445,00 BC A 21 G. N. W./MARGARET JONES 260 OAKLEAF DRIVE RT. 2 P/NE.KNOLL SHORES MOREHEAD CITY, N.C. 29557 445,00 8C A 22 RICHARD C. KING RT. 2, FALLS DRIVE CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445.00 8C A 23 CHARLES LEO WITTE/ANN DRYDEN RT. 2 BOX 508 FALLS DRIVE CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445.00 8C A 24 CHARLES LEO WIT'J.E/ANN DRYDEN RT, 2, BOX 508 CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445.00 ac A 25 CHARLES LEO WITTI:WANN DRYDEN RT. 2, BOX 508 CHAPEL. HILL, N.C. 27514 445.00 BC A 26 ROBERT R. LUCAS RT. 2, BOX 510 CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445.00 90394 • ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR TEE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COST OF PAVING CASCADE DRIVE (S. R. 41873) , CEDRONELLA DRIVE (S, R. g1874) , FALLS DRIVE (S. R. 41875) , VALINDA DRIVE (S. R. g1876) , and CELASTRUS DRIVE (S. R. g1877) , IN CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Map, Property Owners Amount of Block, a Hailing Address Assessment a Lot BC B 1 ALTON R./pctim MAYNARD RT. 2, FALLS OF NEW HOPE CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 ' 5 445.00 BC 3 2 ALTON R./DONNA MAYNARD RT. 2, FALLS OF NEW HOPE CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445.00 BC 3 3 GLADYS WARD RT. 2, FALLS OF NEW HOPE CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445.00 BC 3 4 CLAUDE W. WEAVER_ JR. G-11 COVEY LANE GREENSBORO, N.C. 27406 44$.00 BC 5 5 - LARRY K./SHARRON F. TALBERT RT. 2 15 CELASTRUS DBavz CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445.00 BC 3 6 STUART A. WALLACE 2 CELASTRUS DRIVE CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445,00 BC 3 7 JOHN M./BEVERLY ELLEN RT. 2, VALINDA DRIVE CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 - 445.00 BC C 1 DONALD WILLIAM BANKS 1005 IREDFT,T, STREET DURHAM, N.C. 27705 445,00 BC C 2 DR. JAMES W./SANDRA MOLD 9 FALLS DRIVE CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445.00 BC C 3 WILLIMA M./DORIS BOWDEN RT. 2, BOX 509 CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445.00 00- a95T"';-;'- ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COST' OF PAVING CASCADE DRIVE (S. R. 41873) , CEDRONELLA DRIVE (S. B. #1074) , FALLS DRIVE (S. R. #1375) , VALINDA DRIVE (S. R. #1876) , and CELASTRUS DRIVE (S. R. 41877) , IN CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA gap, Property Owneri Amount of Block, & Mailing Address Assessment & Lot 8D A 1 JOEL PAUL JAMES 109 RABBIT RUN OXFORD, N.C. 27565 445.00 8D A 2 JOHN W./AMELIA K. MATTHEWS RFD 3 BOX 46 OAKDALE DRIVE HILLSBOROUGH, N.C. 27278 445.00 8D A 3 LEON F. CASHWELL, SR. 5801 REESVILLE ROAD 445.00. RALEIGH, N.C. 27612 8D A 4 LONNIE W./HELOISE VICKERS 3515 COURTLAND DRIVE DURHAM, N.C. 27707 445.00 8D A 5 JOHN E./NANCY HILDEBRAND ROUTE 2 445.00 CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 8D A 6 HARRY F., JR./PATRICIA CASHWELL 4 CEDRONELLA ROAD, RT. 2 445,00 CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 BD A 7 ED C./ANNA VAUGHN 3 CEDRONELLA DRIVE, RT, 2 445.00 CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 8D A 8 JORGE LUIS/HATTIS AMIGO 2704 HEATFR GLEN ROAD .00 DURHAM, N.C. 27712 445 BD A 9 CHARLES E., JR./HARGARET TWINE RT. 2, BOX 485-A 445.00 CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 3D A 10 JOEL PAUL JAMES 109 RABBIT RUN 445.00 OXFORD, N.C. 27565 (P)396, , . ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COST OF PAVING CASCADE DRIVE (S. R. 41373) , CEDRONELIA DRIVE (S, R. 41374) , FALLS DRIVE (S. R. 41875) , VALINDA DRIVE (S. R. 41376) , and CELASTRUS DRIVE (S. R. 41877), IN CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Map, Property Owners Amount of Block, & Mailing Address Assessment & Dot_ SD A 11 CHARLES E. JR-/WYNONA JOHNSON RT. 2, SOX 39D-1 PRINCE GEORGE, VA 23875 $ 445.00 3D A 12 CHARLES E., JR./WYNONA JOHNSON RT. 2, BOX 39D-1 PRINCE GEORGE, VA 23875 445.00 3D A 13 SUSANNE Z. de FERRANTI/ELIA EMINE T. VILLANUEVA BOX 3498 DMC STATION DURHAM, N.C. 27710 445.00 80 A 14 KENNETH/JOANNE ROHRBACH RT. 2, BOX 482 CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445.00 8D A 15 KENNETH/JOANNE ROHRBACH RT. 2, BOX 482 CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445.00 80 8 1 CHARLES J./SYLVIA PICKETT 3058 ROSEWOOD CIRCLE DURHAM, N.C. 27705 445.00 813 3 3 W. H. WAGNER RFD 2, FALLS OF NEW HOPE CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445.00 SD B 9 STEPHANIE L./PATRICIA BARTLETT AT- 2, FATTF; OF NEW HOPE CHAPEL HILL, N,C, 27514 445.00 BD 3 10 JAMES B./PAMELA PATE RT, 2, BOX 485-B CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445.00 3D 3 11 WILLIAM C. BYNUM RT. 2, BOX 485 CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445,00 . . • (1089' . 0.00 . . . - ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR TPX LCCAL SHARE OF THE COST OF PAVING CASCADE DRIVE (S.. P. 41873) , CEDRONELLA DRIVE (S. R. 41874) , FALLS DRIVE (S. R. #1575) , VALINDA DRIVE (S. R. 11876) , and CELASTRUS DRIVE (S. R. 41877), IN CHAPEL HILL TOKNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Map, Property Owners Amount of Block, & Mailing Address - Assessment — & Lot• 8D 8 12 WILLIAM C. BYNUM RT. 2, BOX 485 CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 $ 445.00 BD B 13 LEON F. CASHWELL, SR. 5801 LEESVIT,T.R RALEIGH, N.C. 27612 445.00 BD 3 14 WILLIAM E./NINA R. RICKS RT. 2, CASCADE DRIVE CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445-00 BD 3 15 DUANE K./PATRICIA STEWART RT. 2, CASCADE DRIVE CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445.00 BD B 16 DUANE/PATRICIA STEWART RT. 2, CASCADE DRI'VE CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 445.00 0 0 3 9 8. . CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I, Paulette Pridgen-Pond, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that on or about January 14, 1982, I mailed, by first-class mail, postage prepaid, a Notice to each property owner of the Public Hearing to be held on the Preliminary Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving Cascade Drive *S.R. * 1873) , Cedronella Drive (S.R. 4 1874) , Falls Drive (S.R. * 1875) , Valinda Drive (S.R. 4 1876) , and Celastrus Drive (S.R. ft 1877) , located in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina. The Notice mailed set the date and time of the Public Hearing and also the amount of assessment on the property owned by the person to whom the Notice was sent according to the County tax records. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, this the 22nd day of January, 1982, _ Paulette Pridgen bond, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina D-la 1,17, 10:1 r17,71 D.A:re. 32 SujeCt: Falls of New Hope Participatory Paving Project. _ • rx-p* 11)1an_ning Public kra"-ing: X Attackae-nt(s): None irizOMP-tirri Carttect: Susan Smith NuTher: 712-81E11 C , 359 PURPOSE: Confirmation of the Assessment Roll for the Falls of New Hope Participatory Paving Project (SRS 1073-.1877) by the Board. Directive to the Clerk of the Board to deliver the Assessment Roll to the orange County Tax Collector for collection. DEED: Confirmation of the Assessment Roll and directive to the Tax Collector to collect the individual assessments completes the orange County Participatory Paving Program procedures for the Palls of New Hope project. F IMPACT; Upon confirmation of the Assessment Roll and directive to the Tax Collector, the individual assessments will be collected over a five year period to reimburse the County for the initial outlay of funds to DOT for the local share of the project costs. Upon confirmation Of the Assessment Roll, DOT will pave the project roads. RECD:HENDATICN: Confirmation of the Assessment Roll. Directive to the Clerk of the Board to deliver the Assessment Roll to the County Tax Collector to collection. _ . • 7 BoARD c co uts,DaN sag cc10-r r(ii=t• ' D-2 .2'412T.T.OY ri M:;ITIW-n7 /1.17TING DATE 1-25-82 Subject: Request by Duke Power Company for Planned Development - Office - Institutional; Class A Special Use Permit; Rezoning I PrANNIMG PUbliC X yes rim • , . • • AtEachnent(s): Plat; Application,pg. 1•:-2; Inwrmat-i-on Contract: Jim Polatty . . Darative pg. 3-4; -Tax Nap'pg. 6; Letter pg. 11: Chapel Hill Review pg. 9-10; Staff Phone 732-8181 Ext. 342 tinclIngS Pg. 12720; Recommenat,tons pq. .2L • PURPOSE:To receive input and comments concerning an application for a Planned - Development " Office Institutional; Class A Special Use Permit; Rezoning.. MET: The applicant has requested a PD-OI designation for Property located at the intersection of NC 86 and Homestead Road (SR 1777). An office building to serve custoMers, and a maintenance/warehouse facility is planned by the applicant.: The 14 acre tract is proposed to have access only onto Homestead Road. Traffic figures for the area are 8900 trips/day on DC 86 (1980) and 3000 trips/day on Homestead Road. The Planning Staff estimates this use would generate' am additional 680+ trips. Chapel Hill Planning Board has made recommendations concerning the project. Sanitary sewei is not yet available at the site, however discussions about servicing the area are cotinuing, The Orange County Health Department has approved the lot for on site sewage disposal. OWASA has existing water lines Onj36 and Homestead =. _ . -Road. The site is generally wooded and the building is proposed to be set far back from the road. An extensive landscape Plan has also been • - - 1, submitted. IOP.ACT: This request for P0-01 is located at a Commercial Transition Activity Node (CH'-2). The use proposed conforms to the permitted uses in the district requested. The development intensity of the proposal meets the minimums required for open space; pedestrian/landscape space and does not exceed the allowed Floor Area. - I RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Staff recommends approval with conditions as outlined in the findings of fact. 00400 .r� � z APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION 21, 1981 December al DATE The Honorable Board of County Commissioners Orange County, North Carolina COMMISSIONERS: The undersigned request that property located on Tax Nap Number xu " Block number. — * Lot number 41 p Shown on'the accompanying plat, which is presently in a al District be rezoned to PD—oz for the following reasons: To construct the Duke Power Company Operations See attached oarrative_ ' | —� • Signed: Address: ^� O'Brien/Atkins in nsnoo���ea P. A. �� �o/az~ � , ' ~~ �� �� 55 �— P. 0. Box z� wilIiam L. O'Brien, Jr. - 'ap' l oill'-- _C_ 27514 • ~� ^ - Duke Power Company +- • A.- �~--' 91 � �llio� noa� Join J. P. incaid, Jr Chapel Hill, N.C. 27514 / 1 ' ' Z REZONING RB URST-CRGCKLIST OWNER'S NAIM Duke Power Company ADDRESS 9l S. Elliot Road, Chapel hill, NC 27514 s. Current' zoning Rl Tatal number of arras �L l _ 4* Current land use Bweliinq; sin le Tami Type of rezoning rec[uested PD -OI Proposed land use Dube Power Cam anv n exations Center i ptoposed Water Supply; Public X Community Tax map ' 24 Black Number of lots Individual Proposed Se8w5age Treatment; Public '_ Community- Individual septic tank X 8,900 (1980) Access onto state road # 1777 Average daily traffic count on the state road :OQO Describe existing critical areas; Flood prone areas Poorly drained areas. r1,,,n - Streams None Other,sensitive areas• Describe land uses -in: General Area Dweilin Ret 1 T Adjacent parcels of land Dwellinq. sin le Tamil CP ' 00402 DUKE POWER COMPANY OPERATIONS CENTER - CHAPEL HILL, N.C. Narrative for Rezoning and Special Use Permit Application oecem"er 1 , 981 Relation to Major Transportation Facilities --- The site is located lmz=ted at '� intersection'of a major arterial -- (m.c� Highway mo' 86) and a minor arterial (Homestead uoad) , Access to the facility by public and employee automobiles will be provided from Homestead Road 500 feet from N.C. Highway No. 86. In addition, a service entrance will be located 890 feet from the intersection. The Chapel Hill Transit bus route passes by the site headed north on N.C. Highway No. 86' A crosswalk across Highway 86 will link the bus stop with the walkway to the main entrance. Dedication of additional street right-of-way and highway improvements will be in accordance with Orange County and North Carolina Department of Transportation standards and requirements. Sidewalks and bikeways will be as required by Orange County and constructed to Chapel Hill and N.C. D.O.T. standards and requirements. Relation to Public Utilities, Facilities and Services =' ` The proposed planned development district is adequately ervioed by existing water and power liueo' Power is supplied by Duke Power Company overhead lines located along the north side of Homestead Road and the west side of Highway 80' Water is supplied by Orange Water and Sewer Authority lines along the centerline of both Homestead Road and Highway WG' The sanitary sewer and storm and surface drainage systems proposed for the development will be contained within the site. No sanitary sewer service exists in the vicinity of the site. A septic tank is proposed for the facility. No storm sewer system exists adjacent to the site. The proposed storm and surface drainage system is described in detail on the soil erosion and sedimentation control plan submitted with this application. Necessary public services and facilities are adequate to Serve the development. Solid waste disposal will be by private collection. of The site is under the jurisdiction �b o n e Orange County Sheriff's � oepartmeot. The facility will be in the New Hope Rural Fire District and will be served by the South Orange Rescue Squad. ULM�� _ ]!1 ' Physical Character of the Site; Relation to Surrounding Property Development of this site in the manner proposed will create no hazards to persons or property, on or off the trant' The development includes a single building located near the center of the site with associated parking and storage areas. The existing house and outbuildings will be removed when they are vacated by the present inhabitant. u located New construction will occur within a setback line uca e d 100 feet from the zear ^ opecty line and thirty-five feet from the property lines along Highway 86 and Homestead oo^d' Property to the west is owned by Duke Power cnmpany' Actual buffers will be a minimum of 200 feet wide along Highway 86 and 70 feet wide along Homestead nn=d' There are no adverse conditions on the site. The design of the complex limits cut and fill and areas to be cleared and graded. -- .'- -' 4 ' - ...... 1,97‘,.S•-lt.l'it : _ i-------------------- ---- / Y / / N 01- cr 4) -N kk°vt' Sk35 ,,- \ \ ye/ .„4,, . 0\ \ // ...--; .. co. V ÷ °cc. CONC. MON. (F)AREA = \ 1,017:, • \ 0 o 3.91 ACRES 6.1 P %kr..., . ..-% ' (5) ''.' ,c` c' (60 0 4, .90 cZ.c. C) 0 • Qv . • A ol 4- '\1-3 / .' N689•07,1W ;,..)„40 ...21.,, c•csc.\\,,, ,-,3•,,, cp -,.•0) vrAN /.,.. (cmoRco \I, '' ".,n) .... -z, 0-• < *:r t. .... 'LP \ GO' ?a- . ‘.0 0 • ,..>• 'S. ''.5' 1k ,.‘ z CHAPEL HILL BRANCH . 0 .- OPERATING CENTER z v _- AREA = 14.84 ACRES 9 1 0 '--4 CL)A 1 ■ et. . ,..- 9 • -4 ... s• • ,,,, i \ -1 ve"„)......,--"•-•;••• ••• ,o, co r A 0 , 7 V;55 •40, r.: ), 400 r \ ., .,.., ,. ... , S IP 49W-606.0` ■ ., (cHORD) I • , `,..-or ,-1501 'PK. NAIL FOR TOPOGRAPHIC MAP SEE DWG, NO. 409-45 ..., •?,' NOTE : REVISED : 8- 10—! /.4, ,,Z, DUKE POWER COMPANY 7 Ao CHAPEL HILL BRANCH OPERATING CENTER PROPERTY ACQUIRED FROM LJL.LIE C . FREELAND - CHAPEL H ILL,N C. CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP ORANGE COUNTY . SCALE : /" 200 FILE NO.361,-1890861 ., ' T.O. NO. 6921 MISC, BOON NO.ND 590 a BOOK 29 —...--7----- _ 5 FILE NO. 6-806 t.1 l'i'l U I..) 1 . 4353 6 .,....._ /1/ .., , 1...,,:.1 _. i .3209 ____-" 11 ft (1...., if 1 , ,.., ,....,.....,.... 231 I - r_._ — — I _ t v.1,■,, (tvIADY) — 1117I If,b • ,..-i) 6. \ , I \A,417AC _ 1 , • 387 7" N r N 2° •55s0);11 ' -- - • -- -. ,--..... 9z t! I,,,,:, ;;;., tr: 1 t i ri • it. (a-TON" 5 9 AC; °•171 • t-t-t i t -..„„._ 7 AC i 22 - I I , , * .1; --r" 1 . 1 0 I ?..,. 8952 I SEE • II - --... • ' Cr 1 - • ' J I '• 856 6 ,11., —I I C.• R-E• 15/ASTFit6c/.6 , • .. . . t f,l i t i i /D i i 42 12 t : .7-------.....,,j 2 33'.'4.7... .:,,, ■ '...n::,..;LsV.A.,.:,,:,::.,?s,:at.,..dAL.:,,',..,..:,...,.:,..::::.:,:.:•... ",.::::.:;k-:,:z"-:,...".,:i , •••<'-'-'rs,*:,", :z.!..,5:.',M:'-',...:':.:-.7:7ANg.:::::::1:,'....t.0::I=.1.'// "II E. ----"--,.._ , .,... 2.2 2c024:!-- .'-",,',":1;:t;"?..":".-:"'!-L'-',""9.'tt:;•:"..;•"••ti:ttg:t,tt•Ft,::::•;;-:::::::::;•::::.......t.;;:::;:a.....:"•,,,:ti:.,,t,-. , ,...-„,„,-..,,,...s::::.,:.;:,:•%:.6,,..:;•.7r' :st,::::::".•:;:,:-,:::•-t.•::::::-:;‘,:.5;:ti. I ' J, . --cid •-•...„, ',"";:lia.':',:e:Mt"....Z;•"•.:"."7.:::::7: .A:-.W.;;;Ii:.:".:;'„";:"•:".".'1ii:I/ 5,6 SIONNO -\. '9-875- 2: . I ' ''.. .".1t4t44;■ cz •ler INS.,,:e.,,__Hit".'i 141.".:Sir ' 4 I D. 2.21, . 7 11 (- @ ,..,,,,,,.......w, ,Alltsc,5*,.,:;::::::::::::;:::,: + I , . ,. :::.•:e.tix.e.,1/444,,,,s..,:,;:t.,-ix , 1 •4' A C. 1.. ..a, ,.5:::•:,..:::-.....,:.:•:;,,v,..1, - 22 I t,0.,/ 8527 1 I., -''''''K',5-M.--?!:.:;:,:'V:.., :i i . 1 t . . t4 4427 41A ‘ C t ' 8339 6. 418 1 i 1 ‘17)..: ., , •031-7 N.. 189 4C / . • . j --- -- . --- • , , / ... t ,. ,.,. i 1,,, t\- L(39:: .: .--,.' i --,,,,,......_,..,..„.......... . ,......,0,....„......„ 11, T t • 0 .8802 40 ---, t.. , 'it'..4',„4-,:•--"., I10 AC I. I • . ' ,C: _ ________ . 4 675, ;' 1 10 . 1571 )„erst ,.. I ' 6301. m v. _,..-K.''-6 ifif..5 "1- .. 3 .0.1 " I 4,-. . .t .1":"i3)s.,....-. 41:7.7 '''''/••• *I'‘.*!''' , •--• ...4-. '111j. ' - 1* \ 1,.. 1 / f 335P14'''ilitti$ 1 • -• \l'iN.' 115 1-9-I ; . - •0` 4 A r..-i'E;ritf, 1 5.5 18*-F -4' '^ ' - --i " erez:, tt-r‘,/ , „I•e",•,,,,..,",-.;', - ''',....,./.12 I \ . ...„,,,re‘r°cc 44.,..,...,•'. '-'7' .. .:'7r;::'•4'XI' 1.0\V NO RI"f-i- rePt7:3-1'1 ilk tt..LSI ; . ,Fs3j i 3 1.2 9C8 A vac., ct ..: 1.1.1.1- t'.•-t-ti / i 0, • li' ..........,_.-; 1-.....„.„... , ------- ---- i-li ......rierftro,n, ..-.•..— 1.- ...--- : (.....w.,, 1-------,--..., - • ,..................._____,............ LEGEND ., _ - — ..^^ --- —-—- I 1 ....,..:4., -.-- --'''.-—- ' , int cR 5..,.4,:.,,- r.,9••,i4, - %Z..% ---..____________,..— 1 s:rit.:4.! -....' --'-----."'"." 1 :04:::r'11:-7-11WSrt*;S';'4ithlifi) ---—----7-- 'i I tla' -.. S74LEO Diort,t•:;;:,■ r- I . 6 ;I ' 7rn•■ . 41 Richland Drive Newport Nbws, VA 23602 L/I u 72 7 72 C&" to -duce mti 'A et io Z4 t4 0 DI LLILI (P--,I�eA' JA— .V—J— C" Cute C �, - .�- � OL � ev-L W,1[ +u V std TL� CL� -not ttkx- e Ir 00407 F 4_3 Duke Power Company's Class A Special Use Permit Application The following information 2s the Orange County Planning Staffs findings of fact concerning Duke Power'S request for a Class A Special Use Permit under section 8.8.23 of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance. The corresponding zoning dis- trict applied for is Office - Institutional. The following evidence has been supplied by the applicant or by the Orange County Planning Department. Article 8 Special Uses. Ordinance requires: Findings: 8.2.1 a) The applicant shall have the The Planning Staff finds that the burden of establishing, by competent applicant has presented competent material and substantial evidence, the material and substantial evidence existence of the facts and conditions for the approval of the request; which this ordinance requires for with the attached imposed conditions. approval; and 8.2.1 b) The Board shall make written The applicant has provided figures findings certifying compliance with that indicate compliance with Artj : the specific rules governing such in- S Dimensional Requirements and Ar- dividual Special Use and that the use, ticle 6, Application of Dimensional which is listed as a Special Use in the Requirements. There are no requested district in which it is proposed to be variances from requirements. - located, complies with all required re- gulations and standards, including the provisions of Article 5 and 6 of this ordinance, unless greater or different regulations are contained in the indi- vidual standards for the specific Special Use. It shall be the res- ponsibility of the applicant to pre- sent evidence in the form of testi- mony, exhibits, documents, models, plans and the like to support the application for approval of a Special Use. 12 8.2.2 Where the Board finds a perpon- derence of evidence to indicate compli- ance with the general standards, spe- cific rules governing the specific use and that the use complies with all re- quired regulations and standards, the application must be approved unless the Board shall also find, in some specific manner that: a) The use will not promote the public a) The Planning Staff finds that health, safety and general welfare, if there is a perponderence of evidence located where proposed and developed to indicate compliance with the gen- according to the plan as submitted; eral standards and specific rules governing the Special Use and that the use complies generally with re- quired regulations. The following imposed conditions are to be con- sidered a part of the general stan- dards and specific rules for this request. b) The use will not maintain or en- b) No evidence was presented to the hence the value of contiguous property Planning Staff to show that it will (unless the use is a public necessity, not enhance or maintain property in which case the use need not main- values of contiguous property. tam n or enhance the value of contiguous property); c) The use is not in compliance with c) No evidence was provided to the the general plans for the physical devel- Planning Staff indicating that the opulent of the county as embodied in these use is not in compliance with the regulations or in the Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Plan, The use is located or portion thereof, adopted by the Board within the North Office Park (CHT-2) of County Commissioners. Commercial Transition activity node. 8,2.4 In addition to the General Stan- dards's stated in 8.2 the following Specific Standards shall be addressed by the applicant before the issuance of a Special Use Permit: a) Method and adequacy of provision of a) The Orange County Health Depart: sewage disposal facilities, solid waste, ment has approved an area on this lot and water for an in ground sewage disposal system. The Planning Staff feels that sanitary sewer lines should be extended to serve this site and since it is located at a node and more commercial development will take place. OWASA will provide public water from existing water lines. Solid waste disposal will be by contract with a private hauler. 13 00409 6,0 ( b) Method and adequacy of police, b) Police protection will be by the fire and rescue squad protection. Orange County Sheriff's Department, Fire protection will be provided by the New Hope Rural Volunteer Fire Department, rescue protection by South Orange Rescue Squad. This development should not present any problems to these agency's. c) Method and adequacy of vehicle c) This site is located in Chapel Hill access to the site and traffic condi- Township-at the intersection of NC 86 tions around the site. and Homestead Rd. (SR 1777). Traffic counts by North Carolina Department of Transportation were 8,900 ADT on NC 86 (1980) 3000 ADT on 1777 (1978). These streets are designated as an Arterial (NC 86) and Collector (SR 1777) by the Orange County Land Use Plan. Eventually both roads will be 4-lane facilities. The Plan- ning Staff feels that some road im- provements are necessary at this point, as out lined in the attached conditions. The Planning Staff estimates that this development will generate 683 trips per day. There are two entrances proposed for this development; the public entrance is lo- cated approximately 500' from NC 86 on Homestead Rd. The second entrance; a service entrance is located 390' west of the first entrance. Public transportation is available to this site from Chapel Hill Transit and the applicant has proposed to construct a sidewalk from the intersection of 86 and Homestead to their building. d) Specific requirements of all special use requests: 8.8 a) The following additional infor- The following are specific requirements nation is required for all Special Use for this special use request: Applications: Three copies of the Site Plan prepared A site Plan has been supplied. by a registered North Carolina land sur- veyor or engineer which shall contain the following: 1. north point scale and date. 1. North Point, scale and date shown. 2. Extent of area to be developed 2. Extent of area to be developed is indicated; possible future develop- ment is also shown. 14 0 04!111L 3. Locations widths of all easements 3. The location of easements and rights and rights of way within or adjacent of way are shown. to the site. 4. Location of all existing or pro- 4. All existing And proposed structure posed structures on the site, are shown on the site plan. 5. Location of all areas on the site 5. There are no flood prone areas on subject to flood hazard or inundation the site. as shown on flood maps or soil's maps. , 6. Location of all water courses on 6. There are no water courses shown on the site, including direction of flow, the site plan. 7. Existing topography at a countour 7. Existing topography is shown. interval of five feet based on mean level datum. B. Proposed or existing fencing, 8. Storage and warehousing facilities screening, gates, parking, service are shown on the site plan. They are and storage areas. screened and fenced from adjacent uses. A Landscape Plan has been submitted with this proposal and the Planning Staff feels the plan is adequate. 9. Access to site including site 9. Access to the site is shown on the distances on all roads used for site plan. access. 10. Elevations of all structures 10. Architectural elevations have been proposed to be used in the develop- supplied to the Planning Staff. sent. 11.. Names and addresses of owners and 11. The name and address of the owner applicants, have been supplied. 12. A fee, as set by the Orange 12. The application fee has been paid County Board of Commissioners. by the applicant. 8.8.23 Planned Developments 8.8.23.1 Additional Information 8.8.23.1 This refers to the standards set forth in Article 7 Planned Development. In addition to the information re- quired in Subsections 8.2 and 8.8, information shall be supplied as part of the application as per applicable requirements of Article 7. 15 0 04 11 Article 7 Planned Development Districts 7.4.1 Relationship of Planned Devel- 7.4.1 Relationship of this project to opment to Major Transportation Faci- major transportation facilities. (See lities. 8,2.4 c above) Requires that Planned Developments make use of major roads for access; and public transportation facilities available. 7.4.2 Relationship of Planned De- 7.4,2 Relationship to Public Utilities, velopment to Public Utilities, Fa- Facilities, and Services. (See 8.2.4 a cilities, and Services. above) Requires that Planned Developments make use of existing utility systems and not require the public extension of such systems. It also requires that the Planned Development make use of public transportation if available. 7.4.3 Physical Character of the Site; 7.4.3 Physical Character of the Site; Relation to Surrounding Property. Relation to Surrounding Property. The Site shall be suitable for the type This Site is gently rolling with a maxi- development proposed and be free from mum elevation of 512' near the proposed adverse natural impacts, building to a low of 478' at the inter- - section of 86 and Homestead Road. -- There is an existing occupied dwelli7-.; on the property with associated buildings. The site has mature growth on the majority land, with more recent pines growing on the east por- tion. This area has a mixture of devel- opment types with single family dwellings, a church, and an abandoned service sta- tion all located near the proposed pro- ject. There is also an undeveloped 18 acrea tract zoned CC-3 across Homestead Road from this development. 7.16 Planned Development - Office and Institutional Districts. 7.16.1 Planned Development - Office The Staff feels that this development and Institutional Districts Defined; as proposed is substantially in compli- Intent; where Permitted. ance with the intent of the PD-OI section. Planned Development - Office and Institutional Districts are districts for the establishment of complementary groupings of office and institutional uses. 16 U0412 Where existing developments exist, are proposed and previously approved devel- opments are (in progress, which are of nature substantially in accord with the intent of these regulations they may be rezoned to PD-OI status, and shall there- after be subject to the regulations and requirements for such districts) . It is the intent of these regulations to provide for development of such districts at locations appropriate in terms of the Land Use Plan and the Orange County Thoroughfare Plan and in accord with standards set forth herein. It is further intended that PD-OI devel- opment shall be scaled, balanced and located to reduce general traffic con- gestion by providing employment to close to principal places or residence, and convenient pedestrian circulation systems and mass transit devices to further reduce need for private auto- mobiles. Within such districts,, it is intended that uses shall be arranged horizon- tally and vertically: 1. That major vehicular flows and other disquieting influences be so sep- arated from residential areas as to protect privacy and tranquility; 2. That general commercial and service uses be concentrated for maximum pedestrian convenience and located for easy accessibility by workers and visitors arriving by mass transit; and Where such districts adjoin resi- dential neighborhoods, it is in- . tended that arrangement of build- ings, uses, open space and vehi- cular access be such as to pro- 4 vide appropriate transition and reduce potentially adverse effects. 17 -UV ill 3 7.16.2 Permitted Principal Uses and Structures The requirements and limitations that The proposed use and building are permitted apply within PD-OI districts are estab- in the OI district and the proposed build- lished in Article 4 and Article 5. in§ does not exceed maximum allowed levels. 7.16.3 Height Limitations Height limitations within PD-OI dis- The proposed building does not exceed tricts shall be as established in allowed heights. Article 5 and Subsection 6.2. 7.16.4 Permitted Intensity of Development The requirements and limitations that The intensity proposed for this develop- apply within the PD-OI District are merit does not exceed allowed levels. established in Articles 5 and 6. 7.16.6 Site Planning a) External Relationships: The site plan should show how the development will provide protection for the development from potentially adverse surrounding influences and provide-protection for surrounding areas from potentially adverse in- fluences within the development. 1. Principal access points shall be 1. Access to the site as proposed is designed to encourage smooth good and should allow a smooth flm: traffic flow. Street layout of traffic into the project. The shall not connect minor resi- proposed access makes use of a 2-lane dential streets with collector collector street. streets. 2. Access for pedestrians and motor 2. There is a concrete sidewalk proposed. cyclists shall be safe and con- This walk should Parallel Homestead venient. Where there are street Road from the intersection of NC 86 crossings, they shall be so lace.- to the entrance of this project with ted as to be safe, shall be marked a walk along the entrance drive. and controlled. 3. Protection of visibility at inter- 3. The sight distance at both drives sections. Shall be as set forth in should be a minimum of 462' in Article 6. each direction. 4. Uses adjacent to single family dis- 4. There is a 100' buffer proposed tricts which cannot be used for along the northern property line, parking. and the building is at least 100'. 18 titAeLJLO • 5. Yards, fences, walls or vegetative 5. There is an outside storage yard screening, at the edges of the PD- proposed, this is to be fenced and H district Shall be such as to pro- should be screened from all adjacen vide protection for the development property by existing vegetation. , adjacent properties. The building itself will have eartt berms around it, and an extensive landscape plan has been submitted to plant disturbed areas. . _ b) Internal Relationships The site plan shall provide for safe, efficient, convenient and harmonious gourpings of strUctures, uses and fa- cilities, and for preservation of de- sirable natural features and minimum disturbance of natural topography. 1. Streets, drives and parking. 1. Generally the site plan makes safe and convenient use of the propert , Streets and drives shall provide There is separation of visitor safe, and convenient access to service access to minimize conflie :- the site and other facilities if The parking areas will be paved with necessary. Streets shall dis- curb and gutter and the spaces marked. courage through traffic and blocks The proposed number of spaces meets shall be laid out to maximize the minimum requirements. efficient use of the property. _ - 2. Ways for pedestrians shall form a 2. Pedestrian access should be moVed* safe logical and convenient system closer to Homestead Road and be con- for pedestrian access to all units, strutted along the proposed driveway. project facilities and any principal The system does connect this project off site destinations, with the Chapel Hill Transit System Stop across Hwy 86. 3. Protection of visibility for auto- 3. Visibility should be good at all in- mobile traffic, cyclists and pe- tersections where motor vehicles, destrians. Visibility protection cyclists and pedestrians might meet. shall be as set forth in Section 7.16.6 a) 3 above. 4. Open space and spacing of buildings. 4. The project uses about 1/8 of the The requirements for open space, allowed floor area, and provides pedestrian/landscape space; and more than the required minimums in spacing of buildings are contained open space, pedestrian/landscape in Articles 5 and 7. Definitions space and parking spaces. The pro- are in Article 6. puilding is sited at least 100' from any property line. 7.16.7. Sign Limitations. General Identification Signs for the development as a whole. 19 • AW4 1.5 U Ls Shall be permitted as follows: One Signs for the project shall conform sign structure, not exceeding twenty in all ways to the standards contained feet in height, and having not more in 7.16.7. than two sign surface areas, each limited to twenty square feet, may be erected inside or outside required setbacks adjacent to public streets, provided that no such sign shall over- hang any public way or be so located or constructed as to create a dangerous impediment to traffic visibility. Such signs may identify the development as a whole and bear directional informa- tion, but shall contain no advertising matter. Minor Directional Sign Sturctures. Having not more than two sign surface areas, each limited to four square feet may be erected as reasonably necessary for the safety and convenience of visitors to the center. Such signs shall bear no advertising matter other than the name of the development as a whole or an indication of the portion of the development to which direction is given. 20 004 1(-■ The Planning Staff finds that there is a preponderance of evidence to indicate substantial compliance with the General Standards and specific rules governing the Planned Development-Office-Institutional, Class A Special Use Permit. The Planning Staff recommends approval of the request, with the following imposed conditions: 1. That sanitary sewer exist to the proposed site or be constructed as part of this development propoSal. 2. That a plat showing the dedication of 15' additional-right of way on N.C. 86 and 10' of additional right of way on Homestead Road (SR 1777), and a 35' wide landscape buffer from the new right of way line, and any necessary sanitary sewer or drainage easements be recorded prior to the start of any construction. 3. That all structures presently existing on the site shall be removed at the time that they are no longer inhabited by the present occupants. 4. That all signs for the development shall be according to Section 7. 16.7 and Article 9 of the Zoning Ordinance, 5. Drainage, soil erosion and sedimentation plans shall be reviewed and approved by Orange County. The installation of control devices and on going construction work shall be inspected by Orange County. The site shall at all times be in conformance with the Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance. 6. Tnat both driveway access points on Homestead Road be located to achieve a sight distance of 462' each way for each driveway. That plans for these relocated driveways including topography contours across the roadway or a profile of the roadway be sutmitted to the Town Manager of Chapel Hill for his approval prior to the start of construction. 7. That all parking and storage areas with the exception of those to be used for heavy equipment parkdng and equipment storage, be paved to the standards contained in the Chapel Hill design and construction manual. 8. That the proposed dumpster be placed on a 10' x 20' concrete pad 6" thick with wire mesh, 9. That the proposed pedestrian access to NC 86 be relocated to end at the intersection of Homestead Road and NC 86. 10. That left turn lanes and right turn deceleration lanes be constructed to the Town of Chapel Hill Standards, at both proposed entracnes to the project on Homestead Road. These improtements shall be completed prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. 11. If a fire hydrant does not exist within 500' of the building, one should be installed at the intersection of Homestead Road and NC 86 and one should be installed adjacent to the service entrance on Home- stead Road. 21 4i? tr.) ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTAIENT rnT.T.SBOROLTGE NORM. CAROLINA 2727.8 Olt • "..! 4t, — 4."4 csr, NOTICE The Orange County Planning Board and County Commissioners will hold a Public Hearing on Monday January 25, 1992 at 730 p.m. in the Superior Courtroom of the Orange County Courthouse in Hillsborough, North Carolina. In this meeting Duke Power will be requesting a rezoning to PD-OI and "Class A" Special Use Permit under Section 8.8..23 (Planned Developments) of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance- Duke Power is requesting to construct their Operations Center at the North- west intersection of S.R. 1777 (Homestead Road) and NC 86. This property is located in Chapel Hill Township on Tax Map 24, part of lot 41, involving 14.84 acres. We are required to notify all property owners within 500 feet of the property concerning this request. All persons who wish to speak concerning this request will be heard at this meeting. The Orange County Board of Cormiissiorersacts in a Quasi-Judicial matter in hearing this special use. If all requirements in the Zoning Ordinance are met, the Board must approve this application unless the Board finds one of three other conditions applies. Those opposing approval of the application on the grounds that the use will not promote the public health, safety and general welfare, will not maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property or is not in compliance with the general plans for the physical development of the County,shall have the burden of establishing, by competent material and substantial evidence, the specific manner in which the proposed use does not satisfy the requirements for approval of the application for a Special Use. /sw 7 00418 wonK ORDER I/ /q-.3C --37-7 • Ttpo,tTp e , acv. ........_ TAX MAP it 4711 41 -, , . LOT I • - i) , q i '. NAME OF PROPERTY OWNER: ,A4,1 4.(.1‘-c. , cC( i e •,* ,. .. : . .... " 7;:'::'f• PERSON REQUESTINO-TEiT: ' . 0.C4•.• ; -'-•'----, , 'LL..."...-L-.4.;-.--....-..................--:-..7.---, , . -. . .. If different front owner .• authorized by owner: ..,,,---"LYES : .-..r....,,..NO ADORESZ ,,' .(„9• ,:'." /. C //!,.:.-...(,.i", " TELEPH6NE: 9 / - ) /j , •;•''• ___ . . . .i . . . DIRECTION/PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ' : : . . . . C:' - - r ',1-•• s • " : .., ' : . -, ,, . • . : . " ..- . i , . : • , " . WORK REQUESTED: . . FEE PAID: - - ' • --PRELIMINARY LOT EVALUATION: , , . " . . ... . ' ",,t,,,,,- , inn- ANALYSIS - : ..--............:— __ ■ ---""--' IMPROVEMENT PERMIT INSPECTION . I i- : :-- - „ . CERTIFICATION OF COMPLETION INSPECTION PURPOSE OF REQUEST is to determine suitability for ground absorption sewage dis- - . posal system. SPECIFICATION OF PROPOSED STRUCTURE: : i: - - ., i” •:. •''-' : I : :_. , • ,,,, ,,,, : :-.: ,•,. ' ' ,' . :,,.. :;._;,, ',, -;.: " : :;' ,•,:i:' : 'i.'-''' -. ' .', : ' ::".:-.; :".-.':,-'' ”;-.-'' ....‘. • • .:'•;•:•,4 : • 4;,,:),;;;,,,',.: : ,:, , •,..'.7,.::::,-;;;.:,...„, i,-;';...... ' : _ ' '.• '''.:;‘,..,.;,..,•:..;-. - '' ',.:;.;.';,.'..,-.?„,:-,•;;I:.,,,.",:;;::y,;,...„.. : ,•. .;•.• ;,,.:, .., - : -;.;7 (OWNER OF AUTHORIZED AGENT tA, • ,, , , ' / • , , . r - •-..-2.."'7..' (This signature indicates pe-rMission has been .ranted to enter property for . .: ..-;;•,' ' • -..".:',: ;', ' purposes authorized by this work order.)„ .. ";;;;',;;',":!,:',"'"•.':.-% ,. .: ::: . ; .,7:- .-_-,. :.-:-•:-;;;': ; - - . . . . , 2-F2 ,_ ,- :*':- - .:;f:e...;,... *'2.-","•:'-''.'.i.`:-::"...';•-• , :v. ''•':::,•-".... -1-..-..''..--:' ':---:•;:- ' CLASSIFICATION OF SOIL FACTORS (CIRCLE): ' :,',,.. :..;;-.::-.;;;;;• ;•;;:.,',-;V.4..,:';'.:;'„:;,-,--. -,•:'i . 1,:";;;.;;,--... "}:',-;.;,-2,-..;„. , -:'=;41. ."...r-2.-,•.-=''.'1..';';.--il..:'..!': --.:;-: ...:. ''..'-' ,-.N.* ...---..; •'.• • ;".'.:";..-'-;•)'.,.j;`.' ' • -`,'•,-,,S',.s.',; 'i..*:.:.::':-,„ .-;,';;;;:.,";':'-:.'!." ,".' •.: -;::;- :;•• -:...L: _ 4SLOPE TEXTURE0 STRUCTURE(E DEPTH ;' ''?'._'.',':•;.-'.,,,,'_"-;;,,;,;;,„O...,.•:-•.,;,,..:.';:.f;!:1,',.;.•:-'-:--.:,'":.' ',,":::";;,.•; ..',.F;:::,:•:.',:f. 'o',..,,,••,•:•,,:;-;',.-.;:, RESTRICTIVE HORIZONS PS:, ;..,..: ...'!'". i.,41;t',L.4.;!--A rdii,LY;;-;, 0 4c-i--,L.14,1,--ki,..\-r-4?.)::- ' -5.--":"•.K"'.. .=' l"Ro CU.6..z..0jEgo i:.1:5- -4,,PktAtt4 L.N.11:,:: DRAINAGE. ,p4,,,,,::, ,, PERMEABILITY (P&*--4,-. • .. ..,,, -,.• ... ' •, ;.; :::„.". ..... '-;:,..:.,. ‘ '2 u fil.,1: 1,VAI- •-:f ij '.56''.),12.-1": AO?r,...074fitAlayii.7:-.:',Di),), .,,._ ., ',... E ,A1,._ , -11 . 9 n .., ..)..P,.'5,..1 :-.-,::..Y? .1..,0:1',:::.-'relI) SITE tiASSIFICATION'(DIRCLE):..-.7'.---,--:-. ..".:-.-': :.;!: .'•:,:777#;z"----;.:".:;'"::::;;!..;;; :/1 :: ::',:• "•-•:',.>:'•:-.,'"'?.:-.-7••?, :•"':;--:-.".. '..-;7;;,-, - . - • . , • -•:, - ; 1„- :' .''2 ''' ''22,:'',":::"--''' :.:; ',...4',f-..7'. ,:,•,,?..:''', ,':.,:',4,;;;-;:-..-.;':. 1.,,,::::::..„....,5:::- ..!;::,,'.;...' ..:''...;■:1::;':;;:-:.;'SUITABLE: '. .:: UNSUITABLE , . :.- PROVISIONALLY--SUITABLE: ExPianation: ',,, '-.Z:':::-.„,',„:":::::.,',-.:.;2,,,,,,..'„ ,-. :.;•'"i:•.;":"..!'.":“.. • ''.', '; ' .: : " ' ' "'..., '- - • '1'. ' : ..i.'''-•-•';:'-':',. ;";:;:::;'' ';'-'-';'7-- . . . . . . . .., .. .. ---r...) ;--• (.--- . „ , • , . ' DATE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES: ti, ■)‘/L'\: ;;lik:`.:7'0 ksOar.," - •-4 • ' STCNNIIIFIr nir q rtAITTADTAtti Procn DUTMP ccou 1../ rerrc. . . _ 0041.9 ti u j MEMORANDUM To: Chapel Hill Planning Board From: Mike Jennings, Planning Director Subject: Duke Power Company Operations Center Date: January 5, 1982 Request: By Orange County for a courtesy review of a request for a PD-OI to construct a new Duke Power operations center on approximately 20.6 acres of gross land area at the northwest corner of Homestead and Airport Roads. Duke Power plans to construct a building to contain office and warehousing space with ancillary parking and outdoor storage areas. In the future, Duke Power proposes to construct a 100 killowatt power substation on the site. The substation is not a part of this application. Chapel Hill's Land Use Plan indicates an activity center at this inter- section, thus, the use of the site for offices is acceptable. The intensity proposed is well below that allowed for the 01-2 district in the Town. Recommendation: That the Planning Board recommend that the Council' recommend approval of the PD-OI as outlined in the attached resolution. 9 UO42f}. A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PD-OI FOR DUKE POWER COMPANY BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel.. Hill that the Council hereby recommends that the Orange County Board of Commissioners approve the request for a Planned Development-Office and Institutional for property located at the northwest corner of NC 86 and Homestead Roads subject to the following stipulations: 1. That both driveway access points on Homestead Road be located to achieve a sight distance of 462 feet each way for each driveway. That plans for these relocated driveways, including topographic contours acrc3s the roadway or a profile of the roadway be submitted to the Town Manager for his approval prior to construction. 2. That left turn lanes and right turn deceleration lanes meeting the requirements of the Chapel Hill Design Manual be provided prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, 3. That all parking and storage areas with the exception of those to be used for heavy equipment parking and equipment storage be paved to the standards contained in the Chapel Hill design and construction manuals. 4. That the proposed pedestrian access to NC 86 be relocated to the intersection of Homestead Road and NC 86. 5. That the proposed dumpster be placed on a 10' x 20' concrete pad, 6"thick, with wire mesh. 6. That the applicant dedicate additional right-of-way, as necessary, along the frontage of the subject property with Homestead Road and NC 86 to achieve the following standards: For NC 86, 45 feet of right-of-way measured from the center1�, For Homestead Road, 40 feet of right-of-way measured from the centerline. 7. That at such time as public sewer service is available within 200 feet of the site, that the applicant will connect to that system. This the llth day of January, 1982. 10 ,-•' • .• : :''' , ' ,- r- WARD O'''' .00:4`,LISS:LtklEIG ' ' ,-;4:-Erz:--"-rm-i-A.--t-':':i7,.;_.-.: Item t.70 13-3 ACTION AGENDA =A FaSTP.ACT '" Ii.. r.LNG DATE 1-25-02 st-tbi2ct: Request of William C. Ford Planned Development Housing - Bingham Woods, . Class A Special Use Permit; Rezoning 1___D7.Pnr- Z.Th-tt: PLANNING . ' , 1 PtibliC N.Pring: X yes: ' . no . 7 . . - . , • . . • AttalClialant(5):Plat Application:pg. 1-22; Inr forata. .tion. Cant-act: Jim 3-4; Tax 1a pg. Letter pg. 8-9; Planning Staff Findings pg. i0-17:. ITX:xtatl=zer: 732-8181 Ext. 342 Recommendations pg. 18-19, • w . PURPOSE: To receive Public input and comments concerning an application for a Planned Development-housing Special Use Permit. (PD-H): Rezoning.. * . . . . NEED: The applicant has requested a PD-H for 75 mobile home spaces on 78 acres , of land. The property is located in Bingham Township off of SR 1949 (Ford Road) south of Old Greensboro Highway'(SR. 1005). Ford Road has an average of 340 trips/day (1978). This project could generate about 500 trips/day, The property lies next to a large cornfield on the east, William Ford's land is on the south and westsides:and Foxboro Estates is to the north, Building separation will be 30' minimum from the road and 75' center to center and.75' back to back. Two off street parking spaces/unit will be provided. There are central sewage disposal and water systems proposed for the development. Two recreation areas are shown on the plan, each unit-is connected to these areas by a pedestrian path. Private roads are , -. , - - proposed to service the units in the development- , - - ... , . . . . _ . , . . , . IMPACT: The request for 75 units on 78 acres of land meets the minimum require- ments of the zoning ordinance; floor area is below the maximum allowed, open space, liveability, and recreation space are all in excess of re- quired minimums. Privacy for this development should be good since the whole site is wooded, The property is located within the AR district, . . on land that is not used for agricultural purposes. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Staff recommends approval with conditions as outlined in the findings of fact. . , M122 APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION DATE December 21 1.8 The Honorable Board of County Commissioners Orange County, North Carolina COMMISSIONERS: The undersigned request that property located on Tax Map Number . 37 Block number 45 , Lot number_fl . , Shown on-the accompanying plat, which is presently in a Agricultural Residential District be rezoned to Planned Development District for the following reasons: 1. We do not feel that the County Commissioners erred when applying the Agricul- tural Residental District to this property in 1981. However, the intent of the County Commissioners was to allow changes to the AR district where appro- priate and that most changes would be handled best as Planned Developments. 2. One of basic criterion for the selection of AR districts, areas where water distribution and sewage collection mains are not likely within 10-20 years, has changed. A community water and wastewater system is to be built to sup- port the proposed planned development. We would like to emphasize that the rezoning would not result in a higher density for the tract, but in fact would by the owner's decision be developed at less than the allowed density. 3. The proposed rezoning from AR District to Planned Development District will allow for the use of a portion of the owner's family farm's marginally productive farm land for housing purposes, while retaining the more productive lands on the property for continued agricultural and forestry uses. 4. This is an orderly and proper request which meets the performance criteria set out for Planned Developments and satisfies the related goals and objec- tives for AR Districts in the Comprehensive Plan for the County. Signed: Address: 47/4 ;]2 Box 287, Route 5 - William C. Ford , Chapel Hill, NC 27514 1 REZONING RE UEST CF18CKLIST OWNER'S N William C. Ford ADDRESS -Box 287, haute 5, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 AME A ., Current zoning AR District Total. number of acres 78 :5 _ Current land use Farestland Planned Development Proposed.land use Residential Type of rezoning requested 37 Block 45 Number of lots 75 homes `.proposed Water Supply: Public Community__ _ x Tax map 11 . Individual Proposed Sewage Treatment: Public-,_ Community x Individual septic tank�� 1949 Average daily traffic count on the state road Describe existing Access onto state road # critical areas: Flood prone area none Poorly drained areas Wane Streams one- ephemeral Other ,,sensitive areas none -Describe land uses in: General Area nixed residential'and agricultural land uses ' Adjacent parcels of land Sin le Famil Subdivision /Mobile "Home Park /Forest and Pasture Land ' �Y` T• i 00424 bit RDecember 21, eZedDecembr30, 1981 Plarining Associates, Inc. 411 N.Boylan Auenue Raleigh,North Carolina 27603 919-834-8620 BINGHAM WOODS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Project Owner: William C. Ford, Jr. General Bingham Woods is a planned residential community to be located on a portion of the William C. Ford, Jr. family farm in the Bingham Township of Orange County Approximately 78.5 acres of the 248 acre farm will be used to provide spaces for 75 homes, roads, open space, recreation areas and utility systems. The development tract is mostly forested on rolling topography; all planning efforts have been directed at maintaining the visual character of the site. Bingham Woods will be a well planned residential community designed to accom- modate mobile homes on a lease agreement basis. Site design for the develop- - ment will focus on providing clustered wooded home sites that are well-sited , to the topography and are a comfortable distance apart. Most of the tract is wooded; all home sites will be located to maximize privacy by allowing the forest to act as a visual buffer throughout the development and to provide a buffer to surrounding properties. Facilities Site Development - Grading, drainage and land clearing for site development will come under the review of the Orange County Sedimentation and Erosion Con- trol Officer. Site grading and clearing will be minimized to retain as much forested land intact as reasonable. Street and unit signage will be provided as required by Article 9 and 10 of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance. A mini- mum thirty foot buffer along the eastern portion of the property will be estab- lished. No grading or clearing will take place in this buffer. Relation to Surrounding Property - The site is suitable for the intended develop- ment without any hazards to persons or property on the site or surrounding prop- erty. Roads - The development will, be served by state road 1949 a section of which is currently unpaved. A 20 foot gravel collector road will connect S.R. 1949 and access the interior of the development.. The collector will be designed to control road dust to as great an extent as possible through the application of an asphaltic/oil surface spray. The road system will be maintained in good repair by the project owner. Road alignment has been dictated by ease of unit installation and removal, accessibility, and cost. The project will not impact 3 . .. . IJtJLJ zJj Ford Mobile Home Development Planned Development Application Page 2 traffic flows in the adjacent subdivision and will be readily serviced by the existing county and state road system, All parking will be off access roads adjacent to each unit. Water Distribution System - A community water distribution network will be con- structed for the development, A community well will serve the project and will be owned and operated by the project owner. The design and construction will meet the highest applicable standards of the State Health.Department for com- munity water systems. Sewer Collection and Treatment - A gravity sewer collection system will be .con- structed for the development. The treatment system will consist of primary lagoon, storage lagoon and spray irrigation field. The project owner will own and operate the wastewater system. The wastewater system will be constructed and operated in accordance with N.C. Division of Environmental Management rules and regulations. Electric/Lightina - Electric utilities will be installed underground throughout the project. Street and area lighting will be provided in selected areas such as roadways, intersections and community recreation facilities. Solid Waste - A private garbage collection service will be contracted to pro- , vide twice weekly solid waste disposal for individual units in the development. Open Space - Over fifty acres will remain as open space for use by the residents.. The vast majority of open space will remain wooded. Pedestrian pathways will be .provided in the wooded open space to facilitate access from units to recre- ation areas and throughout the project, Recreation Areas - Over an acre of maintained recreation space will be provid- .! for the exclusive use of the residents. Two recreation areas are planned both with grassed open play areas, a basketball court and playground equipment as is necessary to adequately serve the project population make-up. One recre- , ation area will be provided with the first phase of the development with the second recreation area provided as needed in later stages of the development. 4 00426 , - ire2v,„..424.- x.v,„ mai 2, 71,,,,s74. /0c4774A1 .Amp .......____. fro p4A"Iiiv -z2 z4nplii....,criV7 r\) A I4 VII, • rt r *lb."-1.1""s I-. 5 .5‘ JIM .,. VP' lt. '' :,..: 1,IZa LW W., / ..".•.■ ur, ,,,t • ■ 1.,:"1546.6.it':.: i,, ..,z., Mk„V ... •..rlu ,.L ... A,.I.:.■. 1 .... .., 0 I "'"". v. Ink I w. si ■J • Wt. ■ ,, W4 f \,, ,...? vri ,,l, 1 i ,„ ••?..„ .• ('''t.."`*zi. *it "" "..," r*If • ,,' '0011k4''' •, .. .t.. - c7 . •,› .,••, ._ ILU.. .„,, a. '' MO ..t.,. ..--••• Wt. "...-...... 100006 ...„,.t."A-' '6, ,,,, ••II.71,1‘1,!.:*:,a, , ' . „.... it114111. tat le* - uu . ,....?7 ‘. ig-.i.„...,,,,: — .,.. y tw... i 1t..2...tt,iN•,•.,1.4..,4"4H r i ' ,,f 14,',4':4` /i a,:,::r e"'#. j 7 4 T•A.J.4,.r,c•,:cr.r„,,,,,iti.0•.1.,4.,5,p'-'•,g,-..`.... '.vme.ta:.i,.:._, , -1 '." tam\ ;', Or%--sf•a ,... ; . „ • um. ' - 7-;•:',.,..te r•MIA '1/411111vrai ' •" I.'7, •• ••• Croweed. om-igg:111 Eneti'lliiiiih II 4. ...r. ^ ■•-• .."1,17-- 4,.. : 1.".,... :". 41 41 l it f... ?.....,.., Ai 4> — ..:-...!,/0 “,‹ .. t.**4" .....j....11.90, LM iberl,•W■ A;r:::\"*01,,''''' '''... .4.''''; g - )......-..,. - - ' ,. •.dwi 4„ ,..- L. „...., ,,, 11 , 0, A ::•,.., -, .7--,,t4 .,--,......,,. ,...v , 122,j up, /MORO? S.% A $ 'T. .. 4VZ ,...„. ,....„c":7-,,,,e) • , Voo.' Cr.. ,, -= - ,.....44 . .,',...;:. 11. '\'',.. 1 Az: , t ttts st, , 1, Ntil. . ) 31.3V , j •••• ‘........, ' CHAPE 1 •:,,,g '. 1,,,, , ,r• 1 . '.., "1 liti*Tis. ''''.;1\r.k ..ta ''.v..........41 .k 1 . ,..„ . , ,..,.., ' 1 • WI/ tr . ,,,„, Ca" r 09/ A ..' .o. '-I Jo ' P' ■fa \ 41111Kop __,1.- NTP ,4''• it**/ 1 7 .A.' ‘7\., Z: '. t —‘'k:;57-*' S' • -- 1?-•'' '' if" :',•■ /At , -,t2V— 1. -- zSigi, Reithwua) Pe/ozmptir .....). 1 AD f-iim-Al 1 at' I c ,..r. H A M I. ,,_, C 0 U N TI ", 9 / . V.91..,....1L41. . • . '",,...,„ ...."........„, q ttqt...IFI KtY TO COWITI•PAAHUM4403 Iran nritleraltra 1.1411$140111.4.1111;r1,4944141, 'tart,/A.V1HCAt.tel.C.4.7 StATI1WHT14.4-0 PO+ MALAC...t tiOr SHOW.Oft r•C I SOAt illailVa pp.:* OIL*. ' frOADS SOOVIS 14 0#.1.1.g..1„, I Y - t 1 .... tr 11 1 ' 1. 1 i . 1 1 or 1 1 . . ,- 5 ' . / . r/ ~" y��l��z | 00427 �'831 :' | I II ( • ) r t ) ..,--7 , .\I ': '''11,, l'-' i7m______,m,,,____:___,i'IT,L0 U___j_,,-..-.*.,-„_,m_..... „____._:-_..,1 i ..,) : ' ' i i .:;y t Elo,A)4A;p_45.,7,,.EAsTATE 1 , ....,.... „... .., ,i,„0,. ..,. .,. ..., , ,., . , : t:t . 7,7,I.1 10 r• i"▪ .'"''.'""*. \...... ~/y � / � - - `^^ / . _ ... �1M 46. � / ! � ' . e9 \4 . | . . � . . ' . ' O� 5030 / _--__ _� - ' - iii •ow /__ / / . ! ' � . . | ' / � ' / ==~_' � ' ~ `7` � . . ' ' � • e. .... )' / • \| � � ` | � - / - / /\ 6 - f ' G0428 ORANGE COTINTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT EULLSBOROISGE1 NORTH CAROLINA 27278 4.—.. .., 1.. cni EV k7... 12 Sri, it." NOTICE The Orange County Planning Board and County Commissioners will hold a Public Hearing on Monday January 25, 1982 at 7:30 p.m. in the Superior Courtroom of the Orange County Courthouse in Hillsborough, North Carolina. In this meeting William C. Ford will be requesting a "Class A" Special Use Permit under Section 8.8.23 (Planned Develop- ments) of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Ford is requesting to construct a Mobile Home Park known as Bingham Woods on his property. This property is located on State Road 1949 (Ford Road) in Bingham Township, Tax Map 37, part of lot 45, involving 78.5 acres. . _. We are required to notify all property owners within 500 feet of the property concerning this request. All persons who wish to speak concerning this request will be heard at this meeting. The Orange County Board of Commissioners acts in Quasi-Judicial matter in hearing this special use. If all requirements in the Zoning Ordinance are met, the Board must approve this application unless the Board finds one of the three other conditions applies_ Those opposing approval of the application on the grounds that the use will not promote the public health, safety and general welfare, will not maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property or is not in compliance with the general plans for the physical development of the County,shall have the burden of establishing, by competent material and substantial evidence, the specific manner in which the proposed use does not satisfy the requirements for approval of the application for a Special Use. 7 . - 69.0429 ORANGE COUNTY PLAN-MENG-1 DEPARTMENT 311:LLSBOROITGEi NORTH CAROLINA 27278 401 irr VRI 1.= - December 30, 1981 Sunbelt Planning Associates 411 N. Boylan Ave. Raleigh, N.C. 27605 ATTENTION: Larry Zucchino Dear Larry, This letter is to confirm our conversation of Tuesday, December 29, 1981 concerning the Planned Development Application by Bill Ford. There are several areas that need to be addressed before the complete review of the project can be done. Generally, they are additions to the.site plan or additions to the narrative about the project. The following shou -.173e addressed irk,the_narrative, 1.. Method and frequeddy7of solid'waSEU-7dIsposar. 2. Type of road construction planned in the development; roads should be a minimum of 20'. The main road will have to have some type treatment to inhibit dust. 3. Indicate that grading around units will be kept_tp_a_minimum that,. units will ber-a- least 75' aparM . and 100' back to back, That the ' main road will be a minimum of 30' from the east property line and that all grading will be outside of this area- 4. State what type recreation facilities are planned and when they will be constructed in relation to the total development. 5. Will concrete pads be constructed for each unit? State that all parking will be off the access roads adjacent to each unit. Necessary changes to the site plan are as follows: 1. The site data needs to be expanded to include: Gross land area Maximum floor area allowed Floor area proposed Required minimum live- ability area 8 00480' • Sunbelt Planning Associates December 30, 1981 Page 2 Liveability area proposed Required minimum open space Open space proposed Required minimum. _ recreation space Recreation spaCe proposed if of residential units proposed # of parking spaces required of parking spaces proposed Lineal feet of streets All areas should be expressed in square footage. Those areas that can be esaily delineated should be shown (especially recreation) so that we can double check your figures. Show the buffer along the eastern property line and the main access road_ Put a north arrow on the site plan- Submit a utility layout with water and sewer lines and sires shown. Indicate on the site plan the approximate location of the sewage disposal facility and the various improvements associated with it. Name the roads; all names must be checked with Orange County to avoid duplication. Pedestrian circulation should be accessible to all - units- The Signage for the Mobile Home Park shall be in conformance with. , • ment that you and your client shoild be awe of Thestateroad froM the existing pavement to the project entrance would be paved to State secondary roadhstand4rds. Road signs and unit identification will be erected by the developer. The road signs will be according to private road sign standards. The main road of the project will have to be treated . for dust inhibition, at'a minimum- sedimentatien control_shall be reviewed and approved by Orange County. In addition, Orange County shall inspect the installation and on going work for the total project. The project shall at all times meet the requirements of the Orange County Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance, If you have any questions please call me. Sincerely, Rick Cannity RC/sw 9 ct ;0 oicat The following information is the Orange County Planning Department's findings of fact concerning the request of William C. Ford for a Planned Development-Housing Special Use Permit. This request is made under Section 8.8.23 of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance. There is no request for an increase in the allowed intensity of development. The following evidence has been supplied by the applicant or by the Orange County Planning Department, Article 8 Special Use's. Ordinance requires: Findings: 8.2.1 a) The applicant shall The Planning Staff finds that have the burden of establishing, the applicant has presented by competent material and competent material and substan- substantial evidence, the exist- tial evidence for the approval ence of the facts and conditions of the request; with the attached which his ordinance requires for imposed conditions. approval; and The applicant has provided figures 8.2.1 b) The Board shall make that indicate compliance with written findings certifying com- Article 5, Dimensional Require- pliance with the specific rules ments and Article 6, Application governing such individual Special of Dimensional Requirements. Use and that the use, which is listed as a Special Use in the district in which it is proposed to be located, complies with all required regulations and standards, including the provisions of Article 5 and 6 of this ordinance, unless greater or different regulations are contained in the individual standards for the specific Special Use. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to present evidence in the form of testimony, exhibits, documents, models, plans and the like to support the application for approval of a Special Use. 8,2,2 Where the Board finds a perpon- The Planning Staff finds that there derence of evidence to indicate compli- is a perponderence of evidence to ance with the general standards, speci- indicate compliance with the general fic rules governing the specific use standards and specific rules govern- and that the use complies with all re- ing the Special Use and that the quired regulations and standards, the use complies generally with required application must be approved unless regulations. The following imposed the Board shall also find, in some conditions are to be considered a specific manner that: part of the general standards and specific rules for this request. 10 00 4 a2 Ordinance requires: Findings: a) The use will not promote the a) There have been no findings public health, safety and general the the project would not promote welfare, if located where proposed the public health, safety, and and developed according to the plan welfare. as submitted; b) The use will not maintain or b) No evidence was presented to enhance the value of contiguous the Planning Staff to show that property (unless the use is a it will not enhance or maintain public necessity, in which case property values of contiguous the use need not maintain or en- property. hence the value of contiguous property); c) The sue is not in compliance c) This project is located in the with the general plans for the Agricultural-Residential area as physical development of the county indentified in the Land Use Plan. as embodied in these regulations The project is located in the or in the Comprehensive Plan, or forested portion of an existing farm. portion thereof, adopted by the The location of the project and the Board of County Commissioners, type of sewage disposal system pro- posed will not adversely affect the continued use of the remaining portion of the land for agricultural purposes. Further this project adds to the diversity and quantity of housing available in Orange County The project is in substanital com- pliance with the following goals and policies set forth in the Land Use Plan, inlcuding: GOAL 8: Adequate, reasonably priced, safe housing in an appropriate variety of types in proximity to jobs and daily activities for all citizens. 8.1 Encourage the construction and rehabilitation of a diverse range of housing types in response to the needs of various household sizes and incomes. (8.3 Encourage the provision of a range of affordable and suitable low-income housing by means of development incentives in order to provide a balanced housing stock for the residents of Orange Count 8.7 Support the use of individual mobile homes as a useful housing resource in the County by affording 11 . , J Ordinance requires: Findings: these homes the same locational opportunities as single family units meeting the State Building Code. 8-10 Discourage medium and higher density residential development in the rural portion of the County.. 11.1 Identify the type of sewage disposal facilities appropriate for an area as a function of the magnitude of present and future demand. The distribution of users; and the capacity of the natural environment to absorb the impact. 11.5 Facilitate the use of alternatives to the traditional septic systems on land unsuitable for septic tanks and not served by public sewer. 12.7 Develop a road classificaiton system to classify major roads by function for purposes of effective long range planning including the evaluation of highway capacity,. 13.1 Locate parks and recreati facilities close to residenti,,, areas to reduce long trips for re- creational purposes. 13.3 Require developers to provide adequate open space suitable for passive/active recreation in res- idential development. This project is not in compliance with Policies 5.3, 7.5 and 7.6 which address the preferred location of intensive residential development in areas designated Urban and Transi- tion. However, the design and location of the project and the relationship of the rexidential use to the exist- ing agricultural use substantially meets the intent of the Land Use Plan in preserving viable farm operations. 12 _ _ 00434' ' Ordinance requires: Findings: 8.2,4 In addition to the General Standard's stated in 8.2 the following Specific Standards shall be addressed by the applicant before the issuance of a Special Use Permit: a) Method and adequacy of pro- a) There is a central sewage . . vision for sewage disposal disposal system proposed for - - - - facilities, solid waste, and this site, North Carolina water. Department of Enfironmental Management will be in charge of issuing the final permit for this system. There is a central water system proposed which will have 2 wells drilled on the site- Solid waste disposal will be handled on a contract basis with a private contractor. The applicant will supply containers to each individual unit. b) Method and adequacy of police, b) Police protection will be pro- fire and rescue squad protection. vided by the Orange County Sheriff's Department, fire protection by Hhite Cross Rural Volunteer Fire Depart- - -. went, and rescue protection by Or ie County EMS. c) Method and adequacy of vehicle c) Access to this site is from state access to the site and traffic secondary road 1949 (Ford Road). 1980 conditions around the site. North Carolina Department. of Trans- portation figures show an average of 340 trips/day on Ford Road and 1978 show an average of 1300 trips/ day on Old Greensboro Highway (SR 1005) . SR 1005 is designated a collecto road in the Land Use Plan. Ford road runs south off of SR 1005. Ford road is also presently a dead end road. This project could generate an add- itional 600 trips/day. It is approx- imately .3 of a mile from the entrance of the project to Old Greensboro High- . way. Staff feels the access to the site is adequate, with the imposed conditions. 13 0(4345 7 ' -/ ta Ordinance requires: Findings: 8.2.4 d) Specific requirements The following are specific of all special use requests: requirements for this special use: 8.8 a) The following additional 8.8 a) A site plan has been supplied. information is required for all Special Use Applications: Three copies of the Site Plan prepared by a registered North Carolina land surveyor or engineer which shall contain the following: 1. North point scale and, date. 1. North point, scale and date shown. 2. Extent of area to be developed. 2. Extent of area to be developed is indicated. 3. Locations widths of all ease- 3. The location of easements and ments and rights of way with- rights of way are shown. No in or adjacent to the site, widths are indicated on the site plan. 4. Location of all existing or 4. All existing and proposed proposed structures on the structures are shown on the site, site plan. 5. Location of all areas on the 5. There are no flood prone areas site subject to flood hazard on the site, or inundation as shown on flood maps or soil's maps. 6. Location of all water courses 6. The water courses are shown on on the site, including direction the site plan. of flow. 7. Existing topography at a countour 7. Existing topography is shown. interval of five feet based on mean level datum. 8. Proposed or existing fencing, 8. There are no storage or service screening gates, parking, areas proposed. The sewage treat- service and storage areas, ment lagoons are indicated and a fence around the ponds is shown. The site is presently wooded and the developer intends to minimize grading around each unit in lieu of landscaping. 14 U ti 41 3 Ordinance requires: Findings: 9. Access to site including site 9. Access to the site is shown distances on all roads used on the site plan,. for access, 10. Elevations of all structures 10. The applicant proposed that proposed to be used in the mobile homes will be set up development. in the development, 11. Names and addresses of owners 11. The name and address of the and applicants. owner have been supplied. 12. A fee, as set by the Orange 12. The application fee has been County Board of Commissioners, paid by the applicant. 8.8.23 Planned Develo.ments 8.8.23.1 Additional Information. In addition to the information re- The applicant has supplied the quired in Subsections 8.2 and 8.8, following information as required information shall be supplied as in Article 7 Planned Developments, part of the application as per the housing section. applicable requirements of Article 7. Article 7 Planned Development Districts 7.4.1 Relationship of Planned Development 7.4.1 Relationship of this prolr-: to Major Transportation Facilities to major transportatio facilities. (See 8.2.d.: . Requires that Planned Developments make use of major roads for access; and public transportation facilities available, 7.4.2 Relationship of Planned De- 7.4.2 Relationship to Public velopment to Public Utilities, Utilities, Facilities, and Services. Facilities, and Services. (See 8.2.4 a above). Requires that Planned Develop- ments make use of existing utility systems and not require the public extension of such systems. It also requires that the Planned Development make use of public transportation if avail- able. 7.4.3 Physical Character of the 7.4.3 Physical Character of the Site; Relation to Surrounding Site; Relation to Surrounding Procert: Property The Site shall be suitable for the This site is very gentle sloping type development proposed and be free from the east to the west. It is from adverse natural impacts. well timbered with pine and some hardwood. It appears well suited 15 • qi6"4137 Ordinance requires: Findings: for the type development pro- posed. To the north is an exist- ing subdivision, (FOXBORO ESTATES), to the northeast the existing Oak Grove mobile home park with approximately 30 units, immediately to the east is a field under cultivation in corn. The applicant owns the surrounding land and experts to continue to farm and manage the forest land. 7.14,3 Site Planning a) External Relationships: The site plan should show how the development will provide protection for the development from potentially adverse surrounding influences and provide protection for sur- rounding areas from potentially adverse influences within the development. 1-.-Principal access points 1. Generally, vehcicular access to shall be designed to encourate the site is good and allows smooth smooth traffic flow. Street traffic flow- The main access ar layout shall not connect minor not connect minor streets or c: residential streets with collector through traffic in residential streets. Circulation indicated on the site plan. Separates vehciles and pedestrians which is good. 2. Access for pedestrians and 2. Pedestrian circulation as shown motor cyclists shall be safe on the site plan allows access to and convenient. Where there recreation areas without much con- are street crossings, they flict with vehicles. shall be marked and controlled. 3. Protection of visibility 3. Protection of visibility at inter- at intersections. Shall be as - sections. Visibility at the external set forth in Article 6, intersection is good and unobstructed. 4. Uses adjacent to single family 4. The Planning Staff finds that the districts. This section requires proposed setbacks of units 30' from a permanent 100' buffer or lot roads; 75 back to back to be adequate. sizes within the district equal The proposed 30' buffer along the to the adjacent residential east property line will protect both district, this development and the existing farm. 16 00438 Ordinance requires: Findings The applicant owns the remaining property adjacent to the site, 5. Yards, fences, walls or 5. It is the applicants stated vegetative screening, at intent to minimize grading and teh edges of the PD-H district clearing on this site, since shall be such as to provide it is wooded no additional protection for the develop- landscaping or screeing should - - went adjacent properties. be required. 6. Height limits at the edge 6. Maximum height limits will be of Pb-H districts shall be as met by all structures in this set forth in Articles 5 and development. Articles 6. 7. signs visible from outside 7. All signs for this project shall the district shall be according be in accordance with Article 9. to Article 9- b) Internal Relationships. The site plan shall provide for safe, efficient, convenient and harmonious groupings of structures, uses and facilities, and for preservation of desirable natural features and minimum disturbance of natural topography- 1. Streets, drives and parking. 1. The proposed street pattern pro- Streets and drives shall provide vides adequate internal ciruclation. safe, and convenient access to The parking proposed will be off the units and other facilities- street; 2 spaces/unit are designatc,T.. Streets shall discourage through The cul-de-sac layout minimizes th traffic and blocks shall be laid number of vehicles using the secondary out to maximize efficient use of roads. the Property. 2. Vehicular access to streets 2- The site plan with the proposed shall be limited and controlled, parking layout minimizes friction If the street serves less than between the parked vehicles, the 50 units parking can be directly circulation of vehicles and pedestrian off the street. If the street serves More than 50 units parking shall be from controlled points. 3. Ways for pedestrians and 3. The circulation proposed minimizes cyclists Walkways shall form the points pedestrians and motor a safe logical and convenient vehicles conflict. It allows acct system for pedestrian access to recreation areas without util: ng to all units, project facilities streets, and any principal off site des- tinations- 4. Protection of visibility 4. The site plan adequately for automobile traffic, addresses visability protection cyclists and pedestrians. 17 for motor vehicles, pedestrians, and cyclists, by separating them to a large degree. f);13 9 The Planning Staff finds a proponderance of evidence to indicate compliance with the general standards, and specific rules governing a Planned Develop- ment R-1 request. The Bingham Woods application substantially complies with all required regulations and standards. The Planning Staff further finds that the following conditions should be imposed on the Planned Development Bingham Woods. 1. State Secondary Road 1949 be paved to State Standards, prior to the start of construction on units 39-75, from the end of pavement to the entrance road of this project. 2. The roads in the project shall have a 20' wide travel surface, with 4" compacted rusher run and 2 applications of asphaltic treatment and pea gravel. A 30' wide buffer shall be maintained along the eastern boundary of the site. When the access road is constructed all grading shall take place outside of this 30' buffer. 3. If the project is phased, that all improvements for each phase be completed before the start of construction of any subsequent phase. 4. Prior to the start of any construction that the State Health Department approve the final plans for the water distribution system and that the Division of Environmental Management approve the final plans for the sewage collection and disposal system. 5. All roads.will be named and the names not duplicate any other names within Orange County. Road name signs to Orange County standards shall be erected at all . intersections. 6. All units shall not be closer than 30' to the roads, 75' center to center, or 75' back to back. 7. Grading on the site shall be kept to a minimum. In lieu of planted landscaping, existing vegetation shall be maintained between units. 8. All plans for drainage, soil erosion and sedimentation control shall be reviewed and approved by Orange County. In addition, Orange County shall inspect the installation of control devices and the on going work for the total project. The project shall at all times meet the require- ments of the Orange County Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance. 18 • 00440 9. The pedestrian circulation system shall serve each unit, it shall be cleared and grubbed path at least 8 wide, The surface treatment shall be suitable for easy walking. 16. The recreation areas shall be cleared and grassed, a hard surfaced basketball court installed and 2 tot lots built. The first area shall be completed before work starts on units 39-75. The second recreation area shall be completed before the last ten units are completed. • 11. A final boundary survey of the Planned Development and improvements shall be recorded by the developer, 12. The development shall be built and run according to the site plan, and written narrative supplied by the developer, and in compliance with the above conditions. • /sw • 4 19 0114,44,, : ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF cavissioNcEts Action Agenda Item No- E-1 ACTICN AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT MEETING DATE_ January 25. 1982 , ;1..tdect: Advanced Life Support Policies & Procedures . yes x nO 1 Lije-Partrn- nt: Emeraency Services __J Public Hearing: Attachment(S): Iriformation Contact: Bobby L. Baker (NONE) Phone Number: 929-8109 ..• • Purpose: To inform the Board of Commisioners of steps taken by OCEMS to provide Advanced Life Support county-wide at the EMI-Intermediate level; and to present policies and procedures developed by OCEMS for the administration of such service. Need: To meet the requirements of the North Carolina Office of Emergency Medical Services and the Sponsor Hospital; and to develp a mechanism for proper administration of Advanced Life Support on a county-wide basis. ' Note: Board of Commisioners meeting of December 16, 1980 approved recommendation to proceed with negotiations for North Carolina Memorial Hospital to become the Sponsor Hospital for Orange County. June 8, 1.981 a proposal for the provision of Advanced Life Support on a county-wide basis was submitted to and aporoved by NC Office of Emergency Medical Services. (re: ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT TRAINING PROGRAM PROPOSAL. FOR ORANGE COUNIX EMS, REGION J, NCMH, dated June 1, 1981; a joint effort of NCMH and Orange County Government.) July 30, 1981 OCEMS/NC M ALS Training program began. December 3, 1981 19 additional EMT-Intermediates certified by the State. Impact: Improve pre-hospital patient care; provide an on-going education & training program; and consolidate EMS training & operation on a county-wide basis, Recommendation(s) : Recommend that the Board adopt and/or approve OCEMS Advanced Life Support Policies & Procedures if the Board so desires. 'CIT14 42 � . ' `����,' : ..• ORANGE COUNTY BcAno CmeLISsIDasns Action Agenda • Item No, E-2b ACTION AGENDA ITTNABaRxC2 NEEEI.zS"G DATE 1-25-82 Subject: Lease Agreement with JOCCA - Cedar Grove Property ( • oepaxtxrert: Purchasing and Central Services ' Public Hearing: ]es • x r. i � � ` ----' .- Contact-T.. ' Mark Rees & Bill-Laws ut� iu�snt�;; ~^~,^_�___ _ Lease Agreement phone amber: Ext. 498 & 603 • • . . - ^^ • SkzaDzse: Enter into lease with JOCCA for the amount of space being used by them in the Cgdar Grove prnperty, ._- . To show space allocation with written documentation for amounts con- tributed by County. Better control of buildings, liability and maintenance. � More utility in space allocation and util � chargey, and as funds �^�^�� are received and cutback space can be adjusted on a cost amount. ! " i Approve lease no�z�^z�atlon(s) , ` RENTL OPTION 1: • TENANT shall pay to the LESSOR the sUm of ($ ) per annum, oayable in monthly installments of (5 ) each due on the first day of each month, inadvance during the term of t lease *. In lieu of payment the lessor contributes this space as in-kind based on a cha e of $4 !er syuare foot sivind a total of $49 1121. oPTiom 2: (a) TENANT shall pay to the LESSOR the sum of (S ) for the first year of this lease, payable in monthly installments of ES ) each due on the first day of each month, in advance: (b) TENANT shall, pay to the LESSOR the sum of (5 ) for the second year of this lease, payable in monthly installments of ES ) each due on the first day of each month, in advance. Etc, etc. . . OPTION .3: (a) TENANT shall pay to the LESSOR the sum of ) per annum (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the "Annual Base Rent" payable in monthly Installments of II) f ) each due on the first day of each month, in advance, during the term this lease. (b) For each lease year of the lease term commencing with the second lease year TENANT shall also pay to LESSOR as additional rent along with the Annual Base Rent a sum equal to the decrease, if any, in the purchasing power of the amount of the Annual Base Rent since the cmminPncement date of the lease term. The amount of any such decrease, the amount of the aomitiona/ rent and the method of payment thereof shall be calculated and determined in the manner set forth under sub-paragraph (d) of this Paragraph 2. Co) Within thirty (30) days after the publication and issuance thereof, the LESSOI shall deliver to the TENANT a copy of the Consumer Price Index (thereinafter re- ferred to as the "Index") for Atlanta, Georgia, for all items of the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor for the first month of the first lease 'rear (hereinafter referred to as the "Base month") and for the corresponding Month in each Lease year thereafter. If the Index for the first month of the second lease year and for each corresponding month in each lease year thereafter shows a decrease in the purchasing power of the aMount of the Annus Base Rent as compared, in each such case, to the Index for the Base Month, the LESSOR, as soon as possible after the delivery of each Index subsequent to the Index for the Base Month, shall furnish the TENANT with its computation of the amount equal to such decrease, if any, and this amount shall be the amount of the • additional rant payable by the TENANT for the Lease year in question. Such additic rent shall be divided and paid in twelve (12) equal monthly installments during each such lease year. Pending the determination of the additional amount of rent, if any, to be paid by the TENANT, the TENANT shall continue to pay the Annual Base Rent in monthly installments as hereiaabove provided: and when the additional amount of rent has bea.n, determined, r....hm 7..,71 'r nn t-11= c4+...t.;u CARE AND REPAIR OF PREMISES OPT1'ON 1: Maintenance of the demised Premises shall be the responsiblility of the TENANT and said maintenance includes, but is not limited to keeping all drains and plumbing fixtures open, regular cleaning of floors, cleaning of gutters and downspouts, removal of ice, snow or other debris from sidewalks or walkways, cutting of crass, trimming of trees and shrubs, and shall make all repairs, re- placements and renewals, seen or unforeseen, necessary to maintain the interior and exterior of the leased property. All repairs, replacements, and renewals shall be at Lease equal in quality or materials and workmanship to that origin- ally existing in the leased property. TENANT shall also be responsible for keening the heating plant, air-conditioning system, electrical and plumbing system in good working condition. The TENANT shall indemnify the Landlord against all costs, expenses, liabilities, lawsuits, damages, fires, penalties, claims, and demands including reasonable counsel fees and other legal expenses , because of TENANT'S failure to comply with the provisions of this paragraph. OPTION 2: The LESSOR will provide reasonable janitorial services, such as trash removal, window cleaning, floor and wall cleaning, dusting, light bulb replacement, etc. Persons in charge of said janitorial services may at all times keep a pass key • and he and.other agents of the LESSOR be at all times allowed admittance to said leased premises. The LESSOR shall maintain and operate the heating, air-conditioning, electrical and plumbing systems for all parts of the building as well as perform those repairs and maintenance duties on the leased premises that the LESSOR deems necessary and appropriate, including snow removal, cutting of grass and trimming of shrubs and trees. OPTION 3: The TENANT will provide janitorial services such as, but not limited to, trash removal, window cleaning, floor and wall cleaning, dusting, light bulb replace- ment and all other activities necessary to keep the interior and exterior of the Leased premises in a clean and presentable state. The LESSOR shall maintain and operate the heating, air-conditioning, electrical and plumbing systems as well as perform those repairs and maintenance duties as the LESSOR deems necessary and apnrooriate, including snow removal, cutting of grass and trimming of shrubs and trees. OPTION 4: • The TENANT will provide janitorial and maintenance services such as, hint not ' imita. to, trash removal, window cleaning, for and wall cleaning, dusting, light bulb replacement, painting, snow and ine removal, nutting of grass, and =rimming of shru and trees, and all other activities necessary to keep the interior and exterior of 'oasad mrp.mic= -1-.- CARE AND REPAIR OF ?REMISES cont' )( OPTION 4 (cont1 ) : IIIand plumbing systems as well as perform those repairs and maintenance duties as the LESSOR deems necessary and appropriate. OPTION 5: The LESSOR will provide reasonable janitorial services such as: trash removal, window cleaning, floor and wall cleaning, dusting, light bulb replacement, etc. , for a fee of ($ ) per month. persons in charge of said janitorial service may at all times keep a pass key and he and other agents of the LESSOR be at all times allowed admittance to the premises. The LESSOR shall maintain and operate the heating, air-conditioning, electrical and plumbing systems for all parts of the building as well as perform those repair and maintenance duties on the leased premises that the LESSOR deems necessary and appropriate including snow and ice removal, cutting of grass and trimming of shrubs and trees. III r :�:tea._^.Ns : Any at :aion, additions, :opr le':S :r partitions, excee '^g par`:�:ns wpermitted 'av LZSSOR. herein shad to ,mAde at the expense or: the TMNANT. The TMNANT agrees that "NAST will make no alterations, addi.t.4Qns or i... .rovimaents :a the Leased Premizes without the written consent of the LZISCR and that all. alterations,► ' ""; biQr'.S 4r :.STDrC7vemBSta made by and ear the. TENANT, including out not Limited to, any and all subdividing partitions, walls, special plumbing, elec=ical :ist+rs or railings ar whatever tree, xta- terial or heir c, but excepting movable office furniture put ;»n at the expense o.:' the =m em, erects t , when made, be the property af the =SCR and ;ha 1� 'opoa and be sur=endered with the *used ?remises as a part hereof at the a i=arias or earlier arni nIt ioa of this Lease. The SCR, however, reserves the right to require the TENANT to remove any paneling, decorations, partitions, walla, railings, ==tor coverings, booths, Pirmi' i,c, =let"..=ical :;:s:ur=s or office furniture ..astaLied by or at the request of he TENANT, by giving notice of such _.Lacy.on to the TENANT at any time prior to, ar pot Later that an days attar, the expiration or earlier " tion oe said term, is which avert the TENANT, at the TENANT'S S sole coat and expense shall eve the property so speci.'.ied and restore the . as to its originaL condition on or heft= the data of expiration or earlier terminatian of this lease or a data five days atter the giving of such notice, whichever shall be the Later. (1) =car OF Yam: =":.'e TENANT agrees that the =SCR ql,a11 have the right to enter and to grant Licenses to enter the ZA.sed ?remises at any- reasonable time attar having giving the =ANT notices of its intent to sc enter (a! to Pvm;.ae the Leased ?remises, (3) to =aka. aleratr.ctas and repairs to the ;.eased ?mesas ar to the 3ttl;,diag ('m t,. ,mq the right. during the progress ce such alterations or repairs. to keen and store within the Leased ?rises all necessary pat .ale, tools and zcr► ent) , (c) or any purpose white the LESSOR aay_de a necessary for the operation and maintenance of Building, ar (d) to ex-ia t the :eased ? e ises to apaLicante Z~r hire or prospective p r=ha ers. go such entri any R7ammer eetect the all icat.ic.ns and honvenants t f `:is Lease. (3) :S" AND OC"""PAIc'T: TENANT agrees' that the :,eased ?"'Se$ will to used only for the ;nrpCses h `rl_mhei!o a sat out in this lease, that mo unlawful .zse oe the Leased ?remises'�L t8 owe, that � sign, tame, legend. notice or advert.'$ehent aC any {iTil' he :,fixed, painted or di laved on any part ce the 31-L4 '-i 1q, except that name and 'cLSizess ar pro ess. o_ the TENANT nap a the lettering epproved by TENANT or as otherwise agreedto :rt.- the =SCR: and upon mhe tP-nioation oe the -. SM:Z on. the icor or doors to the spec e leased aV ".e 0 .ease, TENANT will vacate and s►z ender possession c= -fie Leased Premises to the =SCR ;: :.eased ses as good condition as the :.eased ?remises this. Lease, ordinary wear and tear expected. The LZSZCR reser-nets the right 'se he :ease- .r°,fri r'1=ose- _ as ...Lc as -t a. '1a� 125 :Jr any r'.35011c1G�a (a) :sr. AND ea=?ANCZ (cent' ) hee.hre usj-hg the Leased ?eamises. • (9) =Isamu= Izecause myth-lag ,:lone, caused to he done, peeeitted cr emitmed by the mumr, the premium raze for any kiad ce irsurence afeeceiag the 3 - tig shall he raised, the ==== agrees that the amount at the increase La premien which the LESBCR ql,A1T he. thereby obligaced ta pay foe such Lesurance shall he paid by the :mom cz the LESS= an demeed, and that if the L2111= .1k1A, 7 demand thaz the TENANT remedy the condition which caused the increase 1:4 the insurance premiem :eta the TENANT will remedy sech cenditica with ia five days aeter mach deeand. The TENANT agrees that the TENANT shell to= do, or eause ta he done, or pemmit an the Leased ?eemises anyehizg deemed =era hazardouz on acccunt *t fire. =es= Shall =ere* fire and exteeded ceverage institance inseriag its inteeest in the Building and the Leased ?remises. TENANT shall car -7 fire end exzended coverage lascrance imsmring its interest., it any, in improvements to or, im the Loesed Premises and its interest im its oftice feemitmre, egaiement, supplies and other pezeczal ercperey. Both-the =SCR and the moz.' nmar hereby waive aay claims or rights at actica which the one may have agmtniem the ether fer :zee or damage covered by smeh insurance policies and both the LESSOR and =mt. cevenane and agree that each. of than will obtain a waive= !rem its carrier 04 such insurance releasing such care .'s suhregaticn rights as against the other (IO) =DEMIT The mmmmwr agrees ta indemmity and save harmless the LESSCR and the agemts, servamte and employees or the LZSBCR against and fr.= any and all claies hy or hehale of any eerecm, finm, or corparacin arisieg by reascn ce injury eo zer3cm or damage to ;. err occueeiag in tee Leased Premizes occasicned in whole on La part by any act on the ear= ct the =sum or aa employee whi/e acting within the seeee oe employ:mat, agene, visitor, assign or uadertenant ce the =mar or by reason of any en.7-awtel ase et the Leased 7eamises or any breach, violation or eampereexmaete oe any covenant in this :4eaSia, on the part ae the =MINT to he case=ed or perfeemed, and aleo or any meet= or thing grawieg vat Q4. the ccee- eancy er ese el the Leased ?remises by the =Enaraz or anycne holiing or zo Oo.1.4 th=gin or . -r the 4-.NeNT. =mar agrees to pay or al:. iamagee to the Buil:14:4g as well as ell ocean ts thereof, =eased hy TENANT'S his.use or tegiert ct said Leased ?remises, its aerrmratzs or aP=u="-"cas. LZSZCR shAl . zat' liable to TEUPW7 far any damage by or teem any ece or aegligence o an or other eccepaam of the Beildiag or by any owner or eceupent ce adtoieieg ton- tiegmces eraperehy. (U) 7:RE ,1R or= cnsamxT the even:. :he Beildiag Le which the Leased rie oa 7.ocated Ls de- seeeyed ty Zi=e, .znanzidable accide= or oasaa2 t7, 7.t.is :ease .;11 ", -"er. porl ta=mL-Lata. FT '. OR ai.. IR 0 ''J�+AL: (coat'1. LisSCR'S opinion, the portion at said 3uil i:q La which the Leased ?remises • axe specifically Located ra.t ct he repaired within einet•p (90) days to ihs approximate candition existing immediately prseed4.1s ,,;4h tire, unavoidable accidene or casualty, raiz Lease :T1.471. thereupon ta=iaa e =a the v enC the poreran at the Buildiag in which the Leased ?remises are scseci ically Located damaged by tire, =avoidable accident, or easua.Lry and the same can he repaired within aimety (90) days eon the data at such tire, navcid- aale ac.-ideas or casualty, the parties hereto agmee that said Leased ?remises shall he repaired and restored- by *LUSOR to the appro=Lmate condition at said used ?;eases 4e Rting hefare said fire, =avoidable accident or casual amt _hls ;ease a�a T • :�"'�l La 3: force and enact: irro7ided, however, that the rent d trhq the period at repair he reduced ta an anount which, in IMSCR'S oc,linica, Bear= the same patio to the rent provided ;or herein as the po=tion at the Leased ?remises than available tar zee heats to the entire leased ?remises. :pc= =platLon of such rega z the :eat ,mil thereafter be paid as provided. tar 'herein as the portion at the Leased ? r4 see then ava ,mse err use bears to the entire Leased ?anises. Upon completion of suuch, rena Lrt 'the rent shA I L th=ealta; he paid as provided in :he aa-agr ph above designated RENT. (12) Le the even: the TEUANT shall :air, to pay any rest when due in accer'...actce with the terms at this lease am! such detaul: st' l continue e for a pertod of _. tan (10) days a=te; wrirtan notice deir7e;ed .0 7.41MANT at the Leased ?remises of such default. the SCR, withoUt prejudice :a any der rights o= r=edies that it =ay have, shall have the right, immediately cr at any time =herea+'.'i..ar,, to re-enter the L s ?remises and remove all persons and ©per+j i'rom the Leased ?remises and ova all persons and propei-M7 :tea the Leased ?remises. ' ses. La the evert the -imT�.3' a lec to ;need cr pestotz any enter covenant, agreP�.`ent sr- +.m ii.�.u..CZn a this Lease or. to conform t ttS_.,:rsr� cog rules and regulations h w in force- a= hereafter j at �..a$ nL'r�.3i dCLCrB'Ced .^.V `.. ..° *.. 3S0eZr the =cSaCR 5h T L giveLwmitten notice of such default to the =AIM and ia the event 'that such deb au.. ;s �t lied within _en (L0) days from the `at9 at such notice, then the LLWOR shATI have the right to eatery the Leased ?;'=tees i=edizzely oz at any time t e eat a and remove the =ANT il=t+ ids 0 ihy =her z ester+;n c the SC r '+13...e- aat;y, the =mum hereby 'esca4,7e3 all claims tar races which hay :e =used ay e w e-en :.I of the aCR a f wi.L. save the LZSZCR tin= any Lass, Hsu or damages zo- r" by LZSCR thereby, and o sZaCh a-en "? a, .A77, --ns—�x3 :mhe forcible end. Should; -:e l,SI CR elect to reins~' the Leased ei ='Mize es -'.E�'i eih `,.�".31T's� 't' should it, -take _assess�ril7 turzaanz ; c :.-e ih nay aither _P*-,1;�?;4e -7 4 s Leese .r it may, 40 tide, wii-hout -- .:rat=5 7.1143 Lease, re-Lem the 7r.recises hr any ;a= thereof to =TINT'S S xMutc far such _..me =r times and et such rental aL or. ten- ';c and '`cost such amhe.,r '_-s- and ",�.'^ c'Z ia its Zcls ::.3:rc-0"ca =3V sd74..acje with the right ma rake alterations and r° '_:e ?r°mves, and the � � _ repairs :.p Leased areal.: pay the- ammo= of rent :me ' ; 'ease the data of the he ,,`::g of payment :_ rant purszaht :a any such (2.2) =TAL'Ly (cont' ) 0 during the r5.mA z eder. of the :arn of thia Lease the difference, . �,Y, we^,ee* the rent collected tr.= such :e- et-. ad the rent reserved La this lease if such read collected is less than that reserved i•i the _ease. No such re-entry or tak+ag possession of the :eased ?remises :y the LZS;,flR shall he construed as an election an its part to ?,-n: "+ate this =ease enless written notice of yr•.ti� ; such intention be given to the CANT. aotwi=hstand�:g any such re-Letting without termination, the =SCR ray, at any time after the occurrence of any de- faule set out in this paragraph To. L2 elect to terminate this Lease and may taw-+mate it by giving written notice to that effect to the =mar. the =wan shall at any time terminate t • Lease-.:.s aSe en account of any de- fault set out is this paragraph, in additian to other remedies is =ay have, it nay recover .lam the mmur 1 ' .�. ' t ---. 3..s. damages ....at i bay ;tee: by reason of the termination of the Lease, including, but mot Limited to, the cos of recovering possession of the used ?remises, and the excess, 1.2 any, or the amount of rent and other amounts to be paid by the- TENANT under the :Q-zs of the Lease :or the =""v'neon of r. he s t t a t s d r e r a n over the then seasonable rental. value of t h e pre- mises far tha ream:c 3 e r of the stated e . (L3) causrmarrm tIEmQ.C„ (Z) I:, before or daring the tam= of this Lease, the =mar shall be adjudged a tal4itpt, cr is any proceeding under the federal bank.:. to Laws ahAl t'%: be filed by or against the TENANT, then such occurrence .a.2 r1, be deemed a Sreach of .4 n Lease and, upon the hapoeng of such event, this lease, _'DSO cQ, 'P'''e4rte ie , and the =Aar shall he liable for all damages sustained hy the UZSI sJR as provided shy Lao. (2) 2f, before or during the tam= of this lease or.any • ewal hereof (a) `:e TENANT shall make as assignment far the henefi_ of creditors or (b) a receiver. shall he appointed far the property of the tr.UNR2 by order of a court of competent 3uriedic inn by mason of the insolvency ar alleged iz- sc1.^reacr ar •othe-"xzse oz nits TENANT, or (c) any depax=ent of the State or red— =-3.1 govern x', ar bay fat thereof authorized :;v :,rder of court Ai,Ai1, Take possession of the husisess :repent-j of the =EAtil" by reason of the insolvency ar alleged L:solvency of the ===.7, or (d) should execution issue cri any ;udsee =en: and te levied against TENANT'S interests in said .ease' ?=..races under this Lease, then, upon the hapteniagcr any one or =are of such events, at the of he +:=1ZR, this. Lease bay option that -- he �zat.d ;,v -�,e :. SCR :fir written aat.cw to affect to the mu sir, and the . s all, is afliition to any other remedie4 provided r' Law i case af .e:sans.= by the TZNANr, he entitled to the Vices set out in the Lest Sentence of Paregrach '; above. (14) ISE=MMENT AND 5L:.."".1"NG .5:mxa;' t a' ' mot se-U, ass:; +, u.edge or by othescs.te this: s .zase. or sub- let the :.eased ?remises or any :art thereof without Ilhe -,;c= written =rum= r . aaCR. maze= hy LES "`eR to cue assignment or subletting a X31± tot j ey.tr c;r or .tverat Is 1 waiver of the prohibitions coma ed ' 3e5i�e:r.'a :r subleases and all � � ;c3�3C3�L'► 3S -� all such later assignments or subleases s;-+a' (L4} ASSZCNMENT AND ^► o ' TENANT shal?. r...vrAl -ale to =SS= for payment ment of all rent :ersia provided :or 0 and for the faithful performance oe all �y :the covenants and cond ons at .-.....1 :.ease by any assignee ar sublessees to the same =tent as if the Lease had mat been assigned or the Leased ?remises sublet. ?_ tlis Lease shat ' be assigned or the premises sublet S,. 71.1,3` r at a, rental that exceeds alts. rental to ,a to Lmssiza heeIr+e/•r., then and in such event any such excess shall be raid over "..e.SSCR by T. (r5) =NIIILVIATZON =s the Est the whole ar any part of the 3 , t :.4a T ; -tti»dsrg . ..e taken by amiZent f4!771=4,-t, or in any manner .ar public :use, the =SCR may at its option ta. data -the estate aray granted by giving written notice of such -..^.::..:at:sect to such NT and npon the giving of shah written notice by U.SSCR he estate hereby granted and all rights hereunder shall fire as a4 the earlier of the data when title to or the right to possession of the Building or a part the~eof shall.1. vast it or be by public authority as aforesaid and any rend t paid !or any period 7' date shall be re a . L ,Mil t` mat be entitled any ?arc of any ward or payment which may be pad or any period iod beyond sail data be -`Paid .a. . TENANT shall mot b+e entitled to any part of any award or Payment which may be paid a :, ,5©R or grade for LESSOR'S benefit in conedeira with a ' m is use, the TENANT shall! ave to claim; ar rights as age LeSSMI for the value or any =-ea tern of ..hi,s tease. is provided, awe widening streets, that the g of streets abutting the Land an which the Building • . stands shall mot alirect this Lease, provided that no Par~ of the ShildinT is ao taken. (16) 3 3C5231NA."ZCi ";ANT agrees that this Lease is and shAll r4.nn T-., subject and srtctr at e to and may be assigned as sec=ity for any Present and alt. ritrre ground leases or tndenlyttg leases of the lailding or of the real ©rame+rr upon which the 3l how j,S Le Located and to and or all ==tgasee or deeds of :_rust which gay or hereafter affect such Leases or the Building' or the real przperty =pan which the Building' q' _s located. and to an or all =enewa?;, orad.i.:ications, con- so.i:.da:;r-r,, replacements and =--en ioLas thereof. .i.e: =Toss si-t.l ', he se:f- oPs_-:rive and as .sec inst==ent shall be eoeesary to effect such ;ror•4 a ion, however, TENANT 3i9at t ZWA.C=7:4 ;rtmptl7 and deli-Ter to 1E.SZCR any such certificate ar certificates --- r.: . a5 as -s�ZIR. ay rer,test evidencing -. a auil- or-i t.aa os his lease to or the assignment of thiS Lease as additional security !or such v'r' d Lease, d =T 4_1 ���.s; Leese, mortgage :.r deed of `175 and "'.=' with am interest herehy ;..turd tee and azpCit:s Z.T.4ZCE as TENANT'S a tamley-La.-;acct coupled SaC�`..2 any such zert' - certificates :�i�ati�-'S �eaa,L:, �.� rort.+�1Zi.�. •� �.�C3�..., .....�.,.��.taS � =SS;�'F"'+:� :� 0 yy - ._ =oh =ecat;or. r r �i , :a the event th �.e real: 7�tL�"':':7 ., —_k' furl ,:�:C _- =non '�ra:.c:. the 31x, ;j..c is Located or a Leasehold Laterest i= .w =al ;roperhy upon which 7he 312.. wing pursuant court =de- it any '. rem osur roceedit' cr is Sold parsZan a owe- of sa.:a aa=ih°d _: mortgage or deed of trust, =o exect:te an et_-rr= -n , .v-1P.tt such _urhah sa -- - - - tot La the ;a.,:=:ot (17) SUZLZ:NG RULES AND RUGZILATTONS The. IANT has read the rules and regmlations here= attached and eade 0 part hereof and hereby agrees to abide by and Conform to the same.,artd ta such fhrtter =Les and regular"Irs as the- TM:XS may tram -time to- tine male° er adopt far mhe oaxe, protection amd henetic ot the Building or the general comfort a.r we7 =are a4 its eccupants. The TZNANT further agrees that the LESSOR shall have the :ithi t a47e arty ar all at such rules in the case af may one or more ANTS La the 3uilding VithIJUL atlecti.ag the %:!..:NAUT'S obligations ander this lease and said =Lest and regaLati4mas and that the LESSOR sinall. mot he tesman- sible En= the mon-emettoemMance by any athet. Immurr to any 0E said rmles ar re- gulations. (2.8) qt..= EISCOTMENT The tzssaR agrees that the TENANT an payiag the stipulated rental Inc. keepimg and 41extc=ing the agreement and cavemants hereim cantained, RhAt: hold and enjoy the teased Pi see dor the tar= aiiaresaid. subject, however, to the terms aZ this lease_ ( .9) xv.rmcm The waiver by LESSOR at any breach of my ccvenant ar agreement herela =tailed =711417 act be deemed tz be a aver of such cavenant ar ageeement ar any subseqgent hreach of the same or any other covenaat or agee=tent heeein contaized. the suhsequenz acteptance of rent hereunder hy LESSOR shall mat be deemed to be a waiver ot amy preceding breach by TEMA= at any =meant ar agreement 02 this tease other than the faiLare ad` the TENANT ta pay the par- ticular :rental so a=epted, regardless ot LESSOR'S knowledce ot mach peecedLmg breach at the time ca &a:mm.1=mm: ot sur-S, rent- (2 ) DX 1 ===== the evert sae Leased ?remises, fer any cause whatever, are mat delivered to the TEMANT' or to the mtalyr's agent !or the pureose of perlarmiag TENANT'S imprzymmeatz T.:Ma:eta &C. the commencement of term .1='.22, the rental shall, abate said premises are made available me TENANT, but the mem= hereof shall not be emtare by reason at such. delay. The rental payable far any fraceianal pert 04 a month shall be grcrated. To, the event the Leased ?remises are tot delivered withia thirty (20) days after the dame fimad far the conmemcement at the twrn hereof, TENANT have the right ma - --Fvf-lete, this Lease =ton written aotice to taat adfect te the TMSCR at any rz1me hereafter but prior ta the mine sa ;==MiSeS are made available te TENANZ, but ia MC e'reM= shel ' LESSOR he liable tt. =mar fax any damages allegedly resultiag fron alty such delay a: atherwise. • :key stipulations, repreeencazians, pr=ises r astreemaTms, axal -zr written, made prior -La ar mmrt=poi-=emialy. with this agee- ent shall have ha Legal cr .equitnble tanseqtences, lad :tte cely agreement made amd b."tr"eg on the par-4es 's :antained herein anL it is the complete tatal ittegrazian at the Itaant and 0 UTILITIES OPT/OU The LESSOR shall be responsible for charges for all utilities, including but not limited to electricity, water, sewage and fuel, for heat. OPTION 2: The TENANT shall, be responsible for charges for all, utilities, including but not limited to electricity, water, sewage and fuel for heat. OPTION 3 : The TENANT shall pay for electricity and fuel for heat based on the following formula: total square footage used by TENANT ( 12,278 sq. ft.) divided by total, usable square footage of the building where the leased property is located; ( 33,773 sq. ft.) , times the amount as the electricity and fuel for heat bills received by the LESSOR during the term of this lease for the building where the leased property is located. The LESSOR shall send the TENANT on a timely basis a statement itemizing such utility charges. Payment shall, be due to the LESSOR a within thirty (30) days of the data on such statements. The LESSOR shall pay 110' for all water and sewer charges. 411 RULES AND REGULATIONS 1. The sidewalks, entrances, hallways, elevators, and stairways shall not be obstructed by any TENANT or used by him for any purpose other than for ingress or egress. 2. If the Building where the Leased Premises is located has in it conference rooms, auditoriums, gymnasiums, gymatoriums, meeting rooms, etc. , their use may be scheduled through the LESSOR or his agent. The TENANT can only schedule the use of these rooms for himself, or his agency, only. Other individuals or groups must contact the LESSOR or his agent directly to schedule the use of these rooms. 3. The LESSOR may charge fees for the use of conference rooms, and auditoriums, gymnasiums, gymatoriums, meeting rooms, etc, to offset the expense of pro- viding these. rooms. 4. No additional Locks shall be placed upon any doors without written consent of the LESSOR, nor shall any duplicate keys be made or obtained other than by or through LESSOR. 5 0 TENANT shall not make improper noises disturbances, of any kind, sing, play or operate musical instruments, radio, or television sets or any machines or devise in such fashion as may be deemed by LESSOR to interfar with other occupants of the Building. 6. The installation of window shades, venition blinds, draperies and curtains 'My be installed subject to n7SSOR'S approval of method 01 installation in- cluding hanging hardware and of color and texture of any such window coverings. 7. TENANT or their employer; shall not: a. Keep animals or birds on the premises; b- allow bicycles or similar vehicles in the building; c. throw anything through windows or down stairways; d. leave premise S unoccupied without lockitg all doors, extinguishing lights and turning off water outlets; e. install or operate vending machines of any kind without consent of LESSOR; f. use premises for lodging rooms, gambling or any immoral purpose; g. open windows while the air- conditioning system is operating; h. keep kerosene, burning fluid and other highly inflammable material on the premises without LESSOR'S consent; i. make adjustments to heating and air-conditioning controls, plumbing • apparatus, electrical fixtures and equipment, windows and doors; (nOtify LESSOR if adjustments are required or desired) j . install any anchorage, supporting or bracing devices into floor, wails partitions or4712. 7.7 (Notify LESSOR if any such devices are desi-ed) . 6. The possession, selling or consumption of alcholic beverages or illegal .-'rugs RULES AND REGUALTIONS (CONT' ) The LESsOR shall not be Liable for any damages due to stoppages or malfunctions . of any sort of the elevators, heat and air-conditioning systems, plumbing fix- tures and the electrical power and lighting system. LO. The LESSOR reserves the right to make such other and further reasonable rules and regulations as in its judgement it may from time to time deem necesary for the safety, care and cleanliness of the premises, and for the preservation of good order therein. 1' . The LESSOR reserves the right to designate the time when and method by which freight, furniture, safes, goods, merchandise and other articles may be brought into or taken from the building and the Leased Premises. Repairs, painting, material moving and other similar work that may be done to the Leased Premises by or for TENANT shall, be performed by any workmen employed, designated or approved by the LESSOR. The LESSOR reserves the right at all times to exclude bootbacks, newsboys (Loiterers) vendors, solicitors and peddlers, from the Building, and to require registration, satisfactory identification and credentials from all, persons seeking access to any part of the Building, at times other than during ordinary business hours. The LESSOR will exercise its best judgement in the execution of such control but shall not be held liable for the granting or re- fusal of such access. 130 The LESSOR reserves the right to regulate and eefitrol all parking lots and - driveways inclreling assignment of parking areas, and instituting traffic patterns 1 ' IN WITNESS WEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Lease Agree- ment as of the day and year first above written. • LESSOR: Orange County By: Chair, Board of Commissioners TENANT: By: ATTEST: Clerk to the Board of Commissioners • S ....J��Ct.%,c� f <t ls.a....c..�.. „+��• y,.'rs..rs -_.' Ter trr Jq�lttE`t' /n.a lor,mi? Gt}O �;ts:uq hot" X37: d U Y r�Ammor! L R &,Is 6.41; alt. eJt• t•A- r nill tell*, fRfltf y2bei 7AO It? f>Orsf JAP sP .ffS 004 ; ttl 4t'q.gIw4 lrx; v h [7-'t GA eAs1 141 te+. f%CfS� t�D 1LitsL7"1'�i ti�e� o V� ytQ¢Cl� iJ Al- AV v Gri[l1 Aa• 37 a S I XaRa� Li vt f3i= Corn m>� n `-i �Ntti+L ?i,,, 4aiE ti of �► ,}S 3SA13 `%16,131 QI-.HI IR6r"I"'4i on RiGGSALL INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. � n - 1 11 mi- tsnano vmEEr . Itlsr orrtcr nox me r4MfiOnQ NORM CAROLINA 211x! - 'IFi.fTHMiF 40141 50-Ml 770.4 _ 72n•s I o -61L[i 720- + r 7Zn - t t r �C�lP tilrlJT'l T�- !7.5) o 720-1 runt %a�:rt•�s, r't_1 "n 720 -+ ���YY'^� t{,y, •ryl1 ^ 1211 = l. D'.3 cn Y 'f 7'7.. ;111. . Ib.� roo r4 s14.4 (rya '1 l ' _ �'firt•' �IvS�n"'i r�.�S Rrn•i �i /s #��1r fS a=ff. rt rM1. 4 et"1 SS+t ?N. jl 60 of &'-'a n L cn•�reotl ►-02S t� E3) tf i l /R7♦ ij � R14ii Rrr*i G1•rc ;'��"'{ . / (► Err Ea t4 4L 4 sS r'•�- of n%s Qtr• `i xSRUL 1(4 71 111r)- ► 11i4 't 165.4 1r,j "t 560 - . Pin— I0, 1,f)"11-4 1'41511 -* 1 r t1 511 = s 1,0511- ► I n5t1 - • 1r050-s 1.725-+ 42 , -+ 5441 -. 141,1► 15 1,41 ;1, t 2r 115-* 2.3411- 7'! .Oln • i if C04t of E Q WAtX , r t t3 Y t4l1- (23Y4 y�.ft)" S I XaRa� Li vt f3i= Corn m>� n `-i �Ntti+L ?i,,, 4aiE ti of �► ,}S 3SA13 `%16,131 QI-.HI IR6r"I"'4i on RiGGSALL INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. � n - 1 11 mi- tsnano vmEEr . Itlsr orrtcr nox me r4MfiOnQ NORM CAROLINA 211x! - 'IFi.fTHMiF 40141 50-Ml 770.4 _ 72n•s I o -61L[i 720- + r 7Zn - t t r �C�lP tilrlJT'l T�- !7.5) o 720-1 runt %a�:rt•�s, r't_1 "n 720 -+ ���YY'^� t{,y, •ryl1 ^ 1211 = l. D'.3 cn Y 'f 7'7.. ;111. . Ib.� roo r4 s14.4 (rya '1 l ' _ �'firt•' �IvS�n"'i r�.�S Rrn•i �i /s #��1r fS a=ff. rt rM1. 4 et"1 SS+t ?N. jl 60 of &'-'a n L cn•�reotl ►-02S t� E3) tf i l /R7♦ ij � R14ii Rrr*i G1•rc ;'��"'{ . / (► Err Ea t4 4L 4 sS r'•�- of n%s Qtr• `i xSRUL 1(4 71 111r)- ► 11i4 't 165.4 1r,j "t 560 - . Pin— I0, 1,f)"11-4 1'41511 -* 1 r t1 511 = s 1,0511- ► I n5t1 - • 1r050-s 1.725-+ 42 , -+ 5441 -. 141,1► 15 1,41 ;1, t 2r 115-* 2.3411- 7'! .Oln • i if Ib.� roo r4 s14.4 (rya '1 l ' _ �'firt•' �IvS�n"'i r�.�S Rrn•i �i /s #��1r fS a=ff. rt rM1. 4 et"1 SS+t ?N. jl 60 of &'-'a n L cn•�reotl ►-02S t� E3) tf i l /R7♦ ij � R14ii Rrr*i G1•rc ;'��"'{ . / (► Err Ea t4 4L 4 sS r'•�- of n%s Qtr• `i xSRUL 1(4 71 111r)- ► 11i4 't 165.4 1r,j "t 560 - . Pin— I0, 1,f)"11-4 1'41511 -* 1 r t1 511 = s 1,0511- ► I n5t1 - • 1r050-s 1.725-+ 42 , -+ 5441 -. 141,1► 15 1,41 ;1, t 2r 115-* 2.3411- 7'! .Oln • i if C?:4AL\1 E COUNTY BOARD CI= CaVISSIOMRS Fz.-tiort ;:rianda 4111 ACTION AGEMN Tl MSTNICT Itp7, E-3 nt:saNG DATE January 25, 1982 Etb3ecl" Procedure for Water Task Force Report Consideration 127iblic Ef_ ring: Er-epart=lt; Attacklmht(s): Minutes of Planning Irtfc:=2#3c1C4intact: Jim Polatty as discussed Board meetings where Report Phone NWe= 732-91-81 w puRposE:To consider what approach the Board of Commissioners wishes to folic to review recommendations of the Planning Board on the Water Task Force Report and the Text Amendments for implementation and to decic whether a public hearing on either or both will be held. The Planning Board completed its work December 1, 1981, on the Repol and January 18, 1982, on the Text Amendments. While minutes on the former have been circulated Minutes of their action on the text amendments will be ready by the date of the January 25, 1982, meeting. The Board should indicate any further information it desires and whether a work session and/or public hearing would facilitate Board and the general public's consideration. A public hearing is not required by law for the adoption. However, 411, since a number of recommendations contained in the Report have generated much public interest, the hearing would provide a forum for persons to address those concerns directly to the Board. M1PACT: The Water Task Force Report contains recommendations on sewer and water extension policy, large lot zoning, natural buffers along streams that will impact the owners of land in proposed protected watersheds. RECOMMENDATION: As the Board decides. liV1 , ORANGE CO=Y PLANNOTG DEPARTMENT *RmsBOROTTGH NOR an CAROLLNA, . 0 27278 d'ir(Thf 4\ 46; ft -2-4tliik. - --#7, ?LAMING BOARD MINUS September 1, 1981 MEMBERS PRESENT: Pat Crawford, Steve Kizer, Alice Gordon, Art Cleary, Tom Bacon, Claudine Harris, John Wilson, Nancy Laszlo, Hazel Lunsford, Logan Irvin STAFF PRESENT: Fred Luce, Susan Smith, Jim Polatty, Narma Walker Agenda /tem #1 kiditians to the agenda. Consideration of Section 2.2.11,i) of the Zoning Crdinance - Advisory Councils. -4- till: Agenda Item #2 Final Plat of Gail and Gary Barker. Polatty explained that the Beard of County Commissioners had initiAlly denied this plat based on a recommendation by the Carrhozo Planning Board and the Commissioners concern about continued small Lot development in University Lake watershed. They have set a moritorium an all development in University Lakewatershal but decided to reconsider the Barker subdivisic since it was in process. The Commissioners have approved the preliminary plan. Kizer moved appi.oval.. Seconded by Cleary. Approved unanimously. Agenda Item #3 to on subdivision which do not came under the moritorium. Amino to the Board of Commissioners Zoom Staff listing subdiv: sions in process which could be emampt from the development moritorium in University Lake watershed was handed out for the Boards information. Polatty explained that the Board of Commissioners was waiting for the Planning Boardts consideratic of the Water Task Force report before it made any decisions on the report. .-0 Added Agenda Item - Section 2.2.11.i) of the proposed zoning ordinance - Advisor .,, Councils. -:. Cleary asked if the section as written was sufficient for the Boards purposes. The old ordinance allow the Planning Board Planning Board Minutes September 1, 1981 Alk Page 2 , III to establish such Councils. Polatty said 2.2.11.j establishes the advisory councils. Wilson said he reealleedthat the committees in j were specialized committees and not advisory councils. Cleary motioned a clarification of section 2.2.11,i) that the Board recommend to the Board of County Commissioners the establishmaTt and/or continuation of Tewnship ;Advisory Council Cooperate with these Councils to the end that the Planning Board investigations of plans may receive full consideration. Gordon seconded. Mation carried with Kizer, Gordon, Cleary, Harris, Wilson, teeelo, Lunsford, Irvin in favor and Bacon abstained. Agenda Item #4 Consideration of the Water Task. Force Report. Luce suggested that the Board consider each of the revanmanda• tians in the Water Task Force Report. Recommendation #1 4,11) Policy on minimizing outflows of water fromlone major basin tc another. Luce described the three major basins in Orange Cour and the transfers of water which now take place either on a , day-to-day basis or in water emergency situation. He said tha there was concern an the part of some Task Force members that water transfers feenreethern Orange to southern Orange could become more coo= to the detriment of water users in the Hillsborough area. Dan Cox, a member of the audience, said that during recent droughts, the Eno River was very low and Hillsborough did not have excess water to give to southern Orange County. He expressed concern that the emergency line between Hillsbaprougt and Chapel Hill would be tapped into for day-to-day use. Wilson expressed concern that Alamance County was receiving northern Orange County water while the policy- would deny soutl Orange County the qeme water. Kizer motioned that the Board of Commissioners adopt reconeend tion number one of the Water Task Force. Wilson seconded. Motion carried with one abstention Gordon. Pecolarethatican #2 411 Allocation of water teen Lake Orange. Luce said that the watt from Lake Orange is owned by the County but not allocated to anyone. Luce seid that this remminendation is tied to the fi/ reaxanendation in that it says the water in Lake Orange shoulc stay in the use Resin_ Planning Board Minutes September 1, 1981 Page 3 Wilson commented that he saw a problem with this reaantendatiz in that it proposed to give scare of the Lake Orange water to the Orange-Alamance Water Systems which was pumping it out of the Neuse Basin to bene„ a conflict with recommiation number ane. Wilsan asked why the water supply for Hillsborough decreased with time. Luce replied that it was because of the withdrawal upstream at Corporation Lake. Kizer motioned approval of the secand recommendation of the Water Task Force. Cleary seconded. Motion carried with 4 in favor, 3 against and Bacon and Laszlo abstaining. Recommendation #3 Water conservation in receiving and withdrawal basins. Luce described OWASA's water conservation plan. Se said there was no similAr plan in place for northern Orange. Kizer motioned approval of the recommendation. Laszlo sec Approved unanimously. ' Ill Recommendation #4 Identification of prime reservoir sites. Luce described the criteria which were used in selecting the f prime reservoir sites from among the twenty-nine potential sit identified in the report. Kizer questioned why only five sites were selected. Irvin notE that industrial development in and around Hillsborough could cause a great demand for water in the future. Kizer motioned that reconrendaticn number four be accepted but that in addition sites 17 and 18 in the report an the north an south forks of the Little River be included as protected sites. Irvin seconded. Luce noted that the five sites identified in the Report are within protected watersheds. The protection of these new sites would require that additional areas of the County be identified as protected watersheds if the same status was afforded to them as to Cane Creek reservoir for example. Ayes: Kizer, Gordon, Cleary, Harris, Wilson, Laszlo, Irvin. 44/ Noes None Abstentions: Lunsford. Planning Board Minutes September 1, 1981 Page 4 Recommendation #5 Regional water sources investigated and water reserved from the Jordan. Irvin moved approval of this recommendation. Kizer seconded. Carried unanimously. Recommendation #6 Grange County should promote efforts to conserve water. Kizer moved approval of the recommendation. Laszlo seconded. Carriedunardmously. Reoanwaulation #7 Adoption of a land use plan which identifiPs protected watersheds. Luce explained that these watersheds were shown on the Land Use Plan which was approved by the Planning:Board and adopted by the County Commissioners and no further action was needed from this Board on this recommendation. Recommendation 48 Orange County should adopt a Land Use Plan which preserves and enhances water quality in protected watersheds. Luce pointed out that the adopted Land Use Plan approved by the Board incorporates this recommendation with the exception of McGowan Creek, watershed areas in the Plan are law density residential areas with little or no commercial or industrial areas. Kizer motioned that the recommendation be approved with the addition of either the watershed for sites 17 or 18 added as a protected watershed. Irvin seoanded. Ayes: Kizer, Gordon, Cleary, Bacon, Wilson, Irvin. Noes: None'. Reoonnmulation Implementation of protection measures by Carrboro, Alanence County, Hillsborough and Chatham County. ,A11/ Gordon motioned to accept the reccemendation with a change in the wording from "should incorporate" to "should be encouraged to incorporate". Irvin seconded. Ayes: Kizer, Gordon, Barri: Wilson, Laszlo. Noes: Cleary, Lunsford. Abstention: Bacon. Planning Board Minutes September 1, 1981 40 Page 5 Recommendation #10 Cneral policy by sewer and water provides not to extend services into protected watersheds. Cleary motion approval of the recommendation with a change in the language from "should adopt" to "should be enoDuraged to adapt". Irvin seconded. Ayes: Kizer, Gordon, Cleary, Harris Wilson, Laszlo, Irvin. Noes: None. Abstention: Lunsfol-d. Recommendation 411 Extension of zoning to water supply watershed areas in. Bingham Hillsborough, Cheeks and Cedar Grove. Cleary noted that the Board had voted against extension in the past. Luce said that the information in the Report might caus the Board to change its position. Kizer motioned that for the protection of County water resourc the County should consider future extension of the Zoning Cmdinance to include those protected water supply areas in 411 Cheeks, Hillsborough, Bingham and CPanr Grove. No second. Wilson moved adoption of the recommendation as writ in the report. Laszlo seoanded. Ayes: Kizer, Gordon, Bacon, Harris Wilson, Laszlo, Irvin. Noes: Cleary. Abstention: Lunsford. Recommendation #12 Minimum two acre residential lot size in protected watersheds. Mere was discussion about how existing small lots uould be treated. Strmarwater management rerpirements uere discussed. There was discussion of the impervious surface ratio for non- residentiAl development. Li, said he would bring further information to the next meting tearing on the reasonakOPTIPqs of this particular recommendation. Gordon rroticted that consideration of this recaamriation be tabled until staff supplies further information about the non- residentiaJ LUI ratio and until the Board can hear input fran the Township Advisory Councils. Seconded by Irvin. Approved unanimously. ,fil Recomeidation #13 Requirement for stream buffers. There was discussion about what uses could be made of the land in the buffer area. Luce explained that ideally the area Planting Board Minutes September 1, 1981 Page 6 remain in natural vegetation. Polatty noted that this would be a zoning regulation and forms would be exempt from it. Gordan moved that the Board table further discussion of this recommendation until they could hear from the Township Advisc Councils. Seconded by Lunsford. Ayes: Kizer, Gordon, Baca, Laszlo, Lunsford, Irvin. Abstention: Cleary Wilson. Meeting adjourned at 10:30,PM. /le ct- ilk 441, I ��������� " � . ' - - NORTH CAROLINA STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS SECONDARY ROAD ADDITION INVESTIGATION REPORT County Orange • Co- File No. Date Township Chapel Hill Div' File No. Local Name Hickory Forest Road and Old Spring Roactubdivfsion Name Hickory Forest Length 0.27 and 0.17 Width 40' D to D Type E Condition Poor . Is this a subdivision street subject to the construction requirements for such streets? Yes Recorded 11-25-68 Book 17 Page 1 Is this a subdivision street subject to participation paving? Yes Number of homes having entrances into road 10 Other uses having entrances into road Nate Does right-of-way obtained meet present Division of Highways requirement? Dedicated If not, why? Is petition (5R-1) attached? Yes s the County Commissioners' Approval (SR-2) attached? If not, why? Does the road meet present minimum Division of Highways construction requirements? No If not, state what is needed to place the road in an acceptable maintenance condition under Remarks and Recommendations. ^ ' Is a map attached indicating information for reference in locating road by the Planning Department? Yes Cost to place in acceptable maintenance condition: Total Cost $ 3,000.00 Grade, drain, stabilize $3,o00.o0 , Drainage $ , Other $ Remarks and Recommendations Minor clearing, pull ditches, machine road, and atabiI1oo- ' . ° - ' aoco^table condition. Recommend addition. ' - Reviewed and approved Board of Transportation Member - Reviewed and approved J. W. Watkins D. H. Janes DIVISION ENGINEER DISTRICT ENGINEER (Do not write in this space - For use of Secondary Roads Dept.) Petition No. (Do not write in this space - For use of Planning Dept.) Form SR-4 (7-77) . . ' OF:SO:G-4 CCUNT!C Fro OF COMTSSIONEAS Action 1,gsr.da ACTIO:1 .ht7,-.7m1A rnai 1EL:71.7.ACC It= ro.E-4 hMMTING ONTEJANUARY 25. tqA, Suhjec February Meeting Schedule of Board ---------- Ipublic HPAring: ---X--- DDp.partm-ent: BOARD OF COMMISS • ' Attechment(s); IhfoltrzaionamtaL-t:Paulette Pridgen-Po l NO Ph 732-3181 ext. 510 One Nmaaarr. MR.P4OSE: To consider the meetings scheduled in February. NEED: The Board has expressed interest in attending the NACo Legislativ4 Conference in Washington, D.C. The Conference occurs February 21-24, inclusive. The Board would normally have a meeting scheduled for February 22 (the fourth Monday meeting) . S MICT: The Board needs to decide whether or not it should cancel the scheduled February 22 meeting in order to attend the Legislative Conterence. This will enable County Manager and Clerk to better schedule agenda requests in February, if the meeting conflict is resolved. RECOmMENDATION: As the Board decides- BAIRD OF Ca'NISSIO)::...-AS Action. Agenda 10 .P=IC61 .1117.1 aSTilACT it E-5 -- METEV3 DANE_JANUaRY 2. Subject: Set data Ear Public searing on proposed Midway Airport and Industrial Park artarert it: BO• - ft 41 : I Public Kaaring: yes n Attachment(s) : Information Contact: Paulette Pridgen-P‘ Yes: 1 letter from. Mr. Mehler & memo from „rim Pole. 'Alone =rimer: 732-8181 ext. 510 PURPOSE: To consider a date for a public hearing on the proposed Midway Airport and Industrial Park. NEED: County staff had proposed a date of February 22 for the public hearing on the proposed Midway Airport and Industrial Park. Kr. Mehler had requested an earlier date for the public hearing. If the Board cancels its regularly scheduled meeting of February 22 this will delay the public hearing requested even further. The Board should consider when it would like to have the requeste public hearing, County Staff suggests February 14; this is the regularly scheduled third Tuesday meeting. neMT: To provide adequate notice of the public hearing, whenever it is scheduled. RECOMMENDATION: As the Board decides. 1 • 0R.z:ZE COUNTY BOARD OF CCT24.1.*SS:COgVS /Action Item t:o.E-6 ACr10:: '1=4 :45.77..11.Cr DATE az_ Subject.E.'m er.d Listing ? rd De‘-artc,olt: 1 Public Bearing: 'Yes I Attachcant(s) Iiit-ormatian COntaCt: Eermit 1i2ne WrinAr- :xt, , Pt=p0se: ;Leo:lest that :aunty .1bnraissibr.ers bansider extending listing ?er-Lbd tArough February' Need: Due to bad 4eather du.ri f ,;ar.uary' .?r.d that Li'anuary 31 :a.Lis on Sunday • : :one • r.ition(s) peloquin associates p.a. 6121k a.a. peloquin a.i.a. lee n. mehler a.i.a. glen r. lehmann a.i.a. architecture planning design/build route 4- box 1748 chapel hill, n.c. 27514 (919) 929-7168 December 28, 1 981 Mr. Kenneth R. Thompson Orange County Manager Orange County Courthouse Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 Dear Mr. Thompson: This letter is to confirm your letter of December 21, 1981- We regretfully accept this additional delay in the public hearing for Midway Airport and Airpark to Febrx., 22, 1982. 1 understand that you do not have any control of the lengthy process of approvals in the county but I do wish, for the record, to protest the continual delays and express our concern and hope that they do not continue to occur for few justifiable reasons. The airport study was originally due to be completed by the end of November. Now it will not even be completed by the January 5, 1 982 • Planning Board meeting . We stated that we would happily wait for this report if it was completed in a reasonable amount of time. This is now becoming some what burdensome but we wilt go along with your recommend- ations. I am assuming that this February 22, 1 982 public hearing will allow us to go to the Planning Board on March 15, 1 982 and County Commissioners on April 5, 1982.. 1 would appreciate your placing us on the top of the agenda for those meetings to allow sufficient input by all concerned. I also appreciate your prompt response in keeping us abreast of any changes or problems in these items. Thank you again. Sincerely, 14 m 7114-44'. Lee N . Mehier, ALA Peloquin Associates, P. A. • .. . e.....-'4;-"-:. .:, '; "..--'Idi"' 2 .. ORANGE COUNTY PLAMNDTG DEPARTMENT HILLSBOROUGH S NORTH CAROLINA. 27278 (,...024 irod,_ ,-....011■74., es -4-,..,:k: 4.... mEMO TO: Ken Thompson County Manager ......41 FROM: Jim Polatty Planning Director ,...1 r. SUBJECT: Extra public hearings to revise the zoning ordinance, or grant a PD/Special Use Permit to Midway Airport DATE, November 13 1981 I received As, Barnes letter today concerning a special public hearing in December - January to consider Midway Airport. A work objective in our work program was approved by the Board to complete a general aviation airport study. The Planning Board • requested $15,000 be allocated to hire a consultant to do such a study. The Planning Board has appointed a Subcommittee to review and help staff develop the study. The Commissioners did not authorize this allocation but left the study as a work objective in our budget. Lee Mehler the developer of Midway Airport has had the plans ready for about one month but has agreed to delay submittal until the study is finished, if the study can be concluded quickly. It is my request that a public hearing be held as soon as the airport study is concluded. Luce and Smith are making good progress. A January public hearing date would give the Planning Board adequate time to review the study. Obviously, the regularly scheduled February date would be more preferable. The options include having the Commissioners call a special public hearing in January to hear the Midway Airport proposal, or delay the hearing until the regularly scheduled public hearing in February. JP/sw 0 aft' -....,4...h.;: . ,, 44%tawocoe- . - STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JAMES B HUNT JR GOVERNOR Graham, North Carolina 272550766 DIVISION OF HIGHWAY WILLIAM R ROBERSON.JR January 6, L982 SECRETARY Orange County Mr. Kenneth R. Thompson, County Manager Orange County 106 East Margaret Lane Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 Subject: Petition for Addition . Hickory Forest Road arid Old Spring Road in Hickory Forest Subdivision ODear Mr. Taompsaa: Attaaned is Form SR-4, Secondary Road. Addition In- vestige:Wm Report, for Hickory Forest Road mad Old. Spring Road in Hickory Forest Subdivision. This is being forwarded to you for review by your Board. of Commissioners. Tours very truly, 7 .2 S. ad Jones DISTRICT ENGINEER /jbh Atta. cc: Mr. J. W. Watkins • NORTH CAROLINA STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS SECONDARY ROAD ADDITION INVESTIGATION REPORT County Orange Co. File No. Date Township lapel Hill Div. File No. • Local Name Hick° • Forest Road and. Old S. Rca4ubdivision Name Hickory Forest Length 0.27 and 0.17 Width 40' D to D Type E Condition Poor Is this a subdivision street subject to the construction requirements for such streets? Yes Recorded 11-25-68 Book 17 Page 1 Is this a subdivision street subject to participation paving? Yee Number of homes having entrances into road 10 — Other uses having entrances into road None Does right-of-way obtained meet present Division of Highways requirement? Dedicated If not, why? Is petition (SR-1) attached? Yes Is the County Commissioners ' ATFO7577—TSR-2) attached? If not, why? Does the road meet present minimum Division of Highways construction requirements? 10 N° If not, state what is needed to place the road in an acceptable maintenance condition under Remarks and Recommendations. Is a map attached indicating information for reference in locating road by the Planning Department? Yes Cost to place in acceptable maintenance condition: Total Cost $ 3,000.00 Grade, drain, stabilize $3,000.00 , Drainage $ , Other $ Remarks and Recommendations Minor clearing; pull ditches machine road, and stabili: _ - • - - -ccenable condition, --commend additim. . Reviewed and approved Board of Transportation Member Reviewed and approved J. W. Watl4as 5. H. Janes DIVISION ENGINEER DISTRICT ENGINEER (Do not write in this space - For use of Secondary Roads Dept. ) Petition No. (Do not write in this space - For use of Planning Dept. ) Form SR-4 (7-77) .....■ >1. 1 0 = Pm 4 7 z < Z g ce . 0 = < Z ce tit 0— < ..... -- 0 L" Z Z 561 i z ..: kJ Ce :-:. 1_ 0 .-: ..c -' ,..... . .< 0 1.1.1 2 0 u. g 0.,... . L) LLI = W— tat. cl- 8 3 5 .... 1 . .J., (D I— 1 . t • 1 k -.N r-_ -...... ........ei Li, cc __iseoZ Z 0 f u- n oLi .... ir4144 cc 0 6 z 31 -.-. ...4 Cld 0 .... ,- - a0 0 z zoo.. ....L. i 7 "0- 0-- 6.7 a . 13 1 3 . I Po 4100, 01 kr Ai 1 ... .., \ N rt ■ g K a - 0 CI <7\.. ■ \ i 1,;.0 ,E i —g: 41,4 / : 1 .., I. .... ., . - S. ■ — 'a- j• - 2 I. , ,...,„,-.....,_ . • - 4.-- ...6.,:,11 tf.",L; """."71........... 1 ° ,;& .-,IN' r.?!i'' ,\1/4.!. , .,11'': 117.7: 775..: ,■,..' . "'N .7 •••••.....4..'.. ,p. ..........,... •s .. Iris' '::., • .... : ,. .,..%_ :.„..i.... .. . ' 4 , , ... . „,„.„ .....: ......... . _ _ ,. : '' if cla-----a ,Nr ......,II... i ....N.' L.,- , "'" ' ■ • :4 "'• 0. .. ?,'.'.'-..v. .. a ).• d 3 i q 0 2 t: 4.1 ; 52 ;11 “:, .3 5 . NN .... 4:•11t---11T-- • i 1 .. "■1.1% .. • I .,- • - . ' !II 1 `•-.. • A , : , ..... ,.... E.: —..., ,., m....., A\4.......\- .....r.... J... . ..., .4, .. .....,' 1 , • 7 . . .. Z •.: ; , Cr"J'.k:: 1\1' ..1.•■ ...”. _... ... :■ .. )11'. \ '1 , • ,' 0\'' :i‘. I 1. .12,4 ei r4 <i> 3': •v,.. . .. 4' *0— 41110111L ,. , `411Elt. - .:., ' '',• „..(-1" ....„,.. 1.:.:k_ ,. .„00,...._:.., ' ... $ , j*K,.•• . 0 --,,, ... •■,.. = , - ',.'' --- 4". ' sta1/4.....R •-■-- -,_ 71,---'44 - . • , ..... ..a;, z• --- --- '5... s-4.74' ill N ...,_, .... 7,. 4:03 c t 4.1 ; gir . .: (..; , .....f -v- .-.. . :. ''-',.., 1- • 'NA-. 4%. ---, , i • q - i (7A ''‘'`. ...L...i fr , , (: , ....: , , .... f:::. 4. . • -. --./-/- " . ...,. . - _ - - .7-i, • .4.-.>, • *1 •,111 IV !-■ . . • '• — V -.•? '..r3. :r.- , /• al i ''''''‘... 7, ...--,, 'F•12, p• !'--0 -..; ''' .t; 1,, 1 = _ . 1 "..5r•- I ff''' 1.• ti sr-7,4.0- .-- ' „:-, E. . , .- • •■ 44+-4. '''' . lir Y ' i:4, ,- ''' ". ' r a i ".. i „, , • -.7 ; ... , -a:. ,.... ■4 r , t ; ';3 ; • .., 4 4 ,a,. i I to1 • • 1� `. ••Z..1 i ----"1"" - • _ ^ T -y ..�., ., • \ 1.; . k I, i .0; .::-^— ''•'.---.-, . 110 l' •••••• L .0 7 ' I 'i try' r • .. 1.""r, ` i^� Q= o• ....---•""\ 4 1 a.1•0 a 1 f. i Q,li�.r l wlt. of .1 . :8� . f� n ej. \ e• . 0 i :V, \= \ dI t•11. r.wr ,•r."•r Z Z .\\ hl �'"' 1• N • rte.• 1...�p ' 1• ol 1r W , J ;Q r ■. I�r4 .,... la Za\ 1 -�w !a I.� c�.. C t p 1 .4r,t4 • C'• to i ....I.1 tow.......„„, r• • ::.: 17:4."".."") i c-J4 c...) \..8 P-. ra , , .... t w, ., .-,.:, ,, I . Z.\ = .�� -_.._. 1 .�� r. _ r cr tt/ .4 •GL�G I J 'S.l .� y �4 "'• Vi • • ...a...... i G v ri 1 I 1 w ... ,7-1 Zil.4M•4I G r ,4 o•(,:: e�.w Y`�....�«w�.i1 �^r• • y 1 ij�+s—^yi \ • • k1 O k.1 t. . 1-it 114 t'1:. ; � .Q I I / CI�.n q o;A:1 c.o Q 1 O:- , (' L.r O A 6.!r r N�r. / 1 e j ,<i L i`S 4.1 I y . fll r. V •:. •• W , -i. Iv!. 3 -.�� •GC •=�: �'..�. i ....�.,�j U 1 • t:U 0-it A V el S I . Recoiled 4 r • k • • -------.."1"11111.1111111111111111111111111 . . : °' .. . _ ..........,.. 77-.. .- :'''-'''-';'---7-7-.,'. ..-,,_;--. :::-...-.:„.. ...-t. :75.-4.-,..t.--,..,:xt....7r-rcir7:77,4474-.7.0t--:7...7---.7-A".--4:-..:.............;'77":" 20.7.11'..0 OF CO:-:%:2:5S.T.C-'1,7-:?5 . 2Cfir'4''.4"^n-AZIN_ l'17:21 T,F2GTRACZ tr.T.,V:1' DATE" 1-19-02 Item T., ..• E-7 Subject.: Petition for Addition of !lickory Forest Road and Old Spring Road to ---- the state Secondary Road system. D.:.-n. - nt:.: Planzlimg .--------------- Public ffe2xirig: , -------. Attaclmtattt(s): Letter, Vicinity Map, ' . Flat, MemO , , . ---_-- __ eS Infazazaati0:1 arecZeZt: Jim Polatty Pincla NtMe.r.7 732-2181 342 R3Rposz: Petition for Addition of RiOkory Co rest Road ( 27 mi.) and Old Spring Road .. .':.,., 7'.- -- -to the State Secondary Road Systexn The State reqUeStS a recommendation f. MeD: s,.t.he County Commissioners an this proposal. _ 8, efore the State accepts iinazis for maintenance in its Secondary Road Frogra it asks for torments by the local governmental unit. The roads .in this subdivision were p1atted prior to 1973: so that the prase standards; of a paved road do not have to be set. ' - , . ,- IMAM Mere is no maintenance on these roads, with 10 houses using the road it is in the County's interest to have the roads maintained. The Planning Department recommends the addition of Hickoz-y Forest .%lad and Old Spring Poad to the State system. , - ..-- STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JAMES B.HUNT.JR GOVERNOR Graham, North Carolina 27253-0766 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS WILLIAM R.ROBERSON.JR January 6, 1982 SECRETARY Orange County Mr. Kenneth R. Thompson, County Manager Orange County 106 East Margaret Lane Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 Subject: Petition for Addition — Hickory Forest Road and Old Spring Road in Hickory Forest Subdivision Dear Mr. Thompson: Attached is Form SR-.4, Secondary Road Addition In- vestigation Report, for Hickory Forest Road and Old Spring Road in Hickory Forest Subdivision. This is being forwarded to you for review by your Board of Commissioners. You:s/ery truly, /u),,2 4:7,7/ 2c-v S. Jones DISTRICT ENGINEER /jbh Atta. cc: Mr. J. W. Watkins _ .