HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 04-30-2007-1ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date:
April 30, 2007
Action Agenda
Item No. 1
SUBJECT: County/OCSJCHCCS Matters
DEPARTMENT: Manager/Budget/CHCCS/OCS PUBLIC HEARING: {Y!N) No
ATTACHMENT{S}:
As listed in "Background"
INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laura Blackmon, 919-245-2300
Donna Coffey, 919-245-2151
Neil Pedersen, 919-967-8211
Shirley Carraway, 919-732-8126
PURPOSE: To discuss various issues with policy and/or financial implications that are of
current interest to the Orange County Commissioners, Orange County Board of Education,
and Chapel Hill-Carrboro Board of Education.
BACKGROUND: The Chairs of the respective governing boards recently coordinated to
establish the topics to be addressed on the agenda for this semi-annual joint work session of
the Board of Commissioners and the two Boards of Education. Staff have compiled
introductory and background information regarding each of the topics (highlighted in bold text
below} that were chosen by the Chairs.
a. School Construction Standards Policy
This portion of the meeting will provide an opportunity for members of all three governing
boards to review, discuss, and ask questions about the School Construction Standards
proposed by the Collaboration Work Group, prior to their formal consideration for adoption by
the Orange County Board of Commissioners.
In May 1996, the Board of Commissioners adopted school construction standards for
elementary and middle schools in Orange County. High School construction standards were
approved in April 1999. Two separate School Facilities Task Forces that convened in 2000
and in 2002 identified a number of issues related to both sets of standards that required
clarification and or updating (e.g. baseline estimates of per square foot cast, an appropriate
inflation factor, percentage of project budget that should be set aside far contingency, etc}.
During the first half of 2006, the Collaboration Work Group met four times to focus on revisions
that should be made to existing Orange County school construction standards. Those
meetings involved primarily information gathering regarding school construction practices and
guidelines, sustainability considerations, and opportunities for community use of school
facilities, particularly with regard to County and municipal recreation programming. Since
September 2006, the Work Group has met three additional times to review and refine
successive drafts of updated School Construction Standards. All three governing boards
received and reviewed an early draft of the revised standards at the September 2006 joint
work session. Of particular note in the Work Group's proposal is the recognition of the need to
consider "non-traditional schools" as well as more traditional models, in furtherance of
evolving educational priorities and smart growth initiatives, and in light of the harsh realities of
spiraling costs in the construction industry.
Those revised standards, once formally adopted by the BOCC, will play an integral role in
shaping the discussions about capital funding -and the sources thereof -that will be needed to
construct the new school facilities that were identified in the 2006 -16 Capital Investment Plan.
The construction standards are also an essential consideration as the County prepares to
engage its external consultant to update the School Construction Impact Fee Technical
Report. That report is a precursor to the BOCC's pending review of the appropriateness and
adequacy of impact fees that are currently being charged for the construction of each new
residential dwelling unit in Orange County.
Attachment A - School Construction Standards Apri12047 Update -Fourth Draft
b. Landbanking History and Goals
Consistent with provisions in the proposed School Construction Standards far consideration of
"non-traditional schools", it is timely for the County, school systems, and municipalities to
collaborate on opportunities to identify and secure potential sites for future schools. The
Chairs recently initiated formal contact with the Towns of Carrboro, Chapel Hill, and
Hillsborough and with the City of Mebane to undertake a specific effort to explore the
prospects for school sites that are consistent with the new standards and that could potentially
be "landbanked" for future use. Elected officials may wish to provide comments ar direction to
County and School staffs regarding this initiative.
Attachment 8 - 4/2/07 Letter from Chairs to Mayors re: School Site Identification
c. Capital Funding Policy, Including Lottery Proceeds
The Board of Commissioners approved revisions to the County's capital funding policy at their
April 24, 2007 meeting. Of particular note are determinations that have been made regarding
the use and timing of budgeting for proceeds from the North Carolina Education Lottery. The
timing of the annual cycle for review and updating of the County and Schools' Ten Year Capital
Investment Plans has also been moved back to autumn so that adequate review and analysis
of capital needs can be accomplished at a time distinct from the annual operating budget
development process. County staff will briefly review the policy changes and their operational
impacts, and respond to any questions that elected officials may have on this subject.
Attachment C - 4/24147 Agenda Abstract: "Approval of County Capital Funding Policy"
d. Fund Balance Policy
Since 1986, the County and two school systems have been operating within an informal
understanding that each school system would observe a specific target in maintaining annual
available fund balance in their respective local funds. Far the Chapel Hill-Carrboro Schools,
the target has been 5.5%, and for Orange County Schools, the target has been 2.7°~. The
higher CHCCS target is related to proceeds from the CHCCS special district tax, receipt of
which are typically concentrated in the period between November and January each year. The
higher available fund balance allows CHCCS to address cash flow needs during the first few
months of each fiscal year, when the monthly current expense appropriations from the County
to the two school systems might be inadequate to address all CHCCS cash needs {as they
are awaiting receipt of their district tax proceeds).
Several years ago, County and school system financial staffs conferred to discuss the
appropriateness of school fund balance targets. Their observations and recommendations
were recorded in a memo from the County Finance Director to the Board of Commissioners,
although na formal changes have been implemented related to school fund balance targets.
Elected officials may wish to discuss issues related to school local fund balances, and to
provide any direction to County and School staffs.
Both school systems have provided historical fund balance information that includes current
projections of their estimated fund balance position as of the end of FY 2006-07. County
staffs preliminary 2006-07 fund balance projections and historical fund balance data for the
County's General Fund are provided as well.
Attachment D-~ - 9124104 Finance Director Memo to 8000
Attachment D-2 - 2/73/86 County Finance Director Memo to BOCC
Attachment D-3 - 4/02/86 BOCC Chair Letter to OCS Board Chair
Attachment D-4 - 4/70/86 BOCC Chair Letter to CHCCS Board Chair
Attachment D-5 - 4127/07 OCS Superintendent Memo re: Local Fund Balance
Attachment D-6 - 4/25/07 CHCCS Superintendent Memo re: Loco! Fund Balance
Attachment D-7 -Orange County Historical Fund Balance Data
e. Fair FundinglEquity
One product of the April 25, 2006 joint work session among the governing boards was a
determination that a work group comprised of elected representatives from each of the three
jurisdictions should make an effort to develop recommendations relating to "school funding
equity" or "fair funding" far consideration by the BOCC during June 2006 budget deliberations.
That work group met twice and developed a set of recommendations that were presented to
the Board of Commissioners at the budget work session on June 8, 2006.
As a starting point for discussion among the elected officials about what additional steps
should be pursued vis-a-vis "fair funding" or "school funding equity", the following documents
are provided for background:
• Facilitator meeting notes from the first Fair Funding Work Group meeting
• Specific recommendations developed at the second Fair Funding Work Group meeting
• April 2007 draft goal related to "Fair Funding far Schools" (NOTE: this draft version
does not reflect modifications discussed by the BOCC at their regular meeting on April
24, 2007}
Attachment E-1 - 5!23/06 Fair Funding Work Group Meeting -Facilitator's Notes
Attachment E-2 - 6!08/06 Recommendations of the Fair Funding Work Group to the
Board of County Commissioners
Attachment E-3 - Apri12007 BOCC Draft Goal - "Fair Funding for Schools"
3
4
f. School Health/Day Clinics Proposal
Over the past two years, a small group of individuals have met periodically to assess the need
far aschool-based health center for the Orange County School District. The group has
included representatives from Orange County Schools, the Department of Social Services, the
Health Department, and OPC Mental Health. Presentations reviewing the data and the
concepts that the group has discussed have been made to the Orange County School Board,
the Social Services Board, and the Health Board. OCS have secured a small planning grant
that will be utilized aver the upcoming year to engage in mare definitive planning for a possible
school-based health center initiative. OCS staff will provide a brief overview and would
welcome BOCC endorsement of and support for the planning effort. Other public and private
community partners will collaborate in planning far the implementation of these concepts.
Attachment F-1- OCS School-Based Health Center Initiative
Attachment F-2 - PowerPoint Handouts: "Working Together to Improve the Health
& Academic Success of Orange County School District Students"
g. Middle College High School Update
The Middle College High School initiative began two years ago as a joint endeavor among the
Orange County Schools, Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools, Durham Public Schools, and
Durham Technical Community College. The first group of students is preparing to graduate
next month. Recently, elected and staff representatives of bath OCS and CHCCS made a site
visit to the middle college program. They will briefly share information about the program
received during the course of that visit.
Attachment G -Middle College High School Statistical & Scheduling Data Tables
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact tied directly to the discussion at this
meeting. However, decisions that the school boards and BOCC will make at subsequent
meetings are likely to have significant implications for future capital and operating budgets.
RECOMMENDATIONS}: The Manager recommends that the boards discuss the issues
noted and provide direction to staff, as appropriate.