HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 12-05-94 - VIII-I 1
ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: December 5, 1994
Action Agenda
Item # -I
SUBJECT: Fox Hill Farm Phase One Section C - Preliminary Plan
ACTION BY: January 19, 1995
DEPARTMENT: Planning PUBLIC HEARING Yes X No
ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: Eddie Kirk
Ext. 2582
Resolution of Approval
Application
Vicinity Map TELEPHONE NUMBERS:
Fiscal Impact Analysis Hillsborough - 732-8181
Preliminary Plan Durham - 688-7331
Draft 11/21/94 Planning Board Minutes Mebane - 227-2031
Chapel Hill - 967-9251
PURPOSE: Consideration of the Concept Plan for Fox Hill Farm
Phase One Section C.
BACKGROUND: The property is located in Eno Township on the north
side of Miller Road (SR 1555) at the intersection with
Baldwin Road (SR 1554) . Miller Road is a paved state-
maintained road, however, Baldwin is an unpaved state-
maintained road. A 1992 traffic count on Miller Road
indicated 150 trips per day. Baldwin Road had a
traffic count of 80 trips per day in 1992 . The
proposed road will be directly across Miller Road from
Meadow Wind Lane. Meadow Wind Lane extends south off
Miller Road and was in the first phase of Fox Hill
Farm.
The total acreage of the area to be subdivided is
65. 61. Thirty-nine (39) lots are proposed which
average 1. 54 acres in size. All lots will be served by
individual wells and septic tanks. The first phase of
Fox Hill Farm was approved in 1992 and is located on
the west side of Baldwin Road south of Miller Road.
Section A of the second phase received preliminary
approval on October 4 , 1993 . A final plat has been
submitted for this phase.
2
The property is zoned Agricultural Residential (AR) .
It is also designated Agricultural Residential in the
Comprehensive Plan. Public roads are proposed to serve
the subdivision.
The Planning Board approved the Concept Plan for Fox
Hill Farm Phase One Section C on July 18 , 1994 subject
to the following conditions:
1. All lots shall receive access from the internal
roads instead of Miller Road.
2 . As a condition of preliminary plan approval and
included in the -Resolution of Approval, a proposed
general plan of the overall development shall be
submitted with the concept plan of the next phase.
To the extent that a reasonable estimate of the
information can be obtained, this plan should
indicate an overall parcel boundary of the area to
be developed, approximate acreage and density in
each phase, and estimate of time period for each
phase, and the location of collector roads in the
development.
On November 21, 1994 the Planning Board unanimously
recommended approval of the Preliminary Plan for Fox
Hill Farm Phase One Section C subject to the conditions
contained in the attached Resolution of Approval.
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends approval of the
Preliminary Plan for Fox Hill Farm Phase One Section C
subject to the conditions contained in the attached
Resolution of Approval.
3
RESOLUTION
OF THE
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Date December 5, 1994
Name of Subdivision Fox Hill Farm Phase One Section "C"
Owner/Applicant Randolph D. Fox
The Board. of County Commissioners hereby approves Fox Hill Farm Phase One Section C
subdivision preliminary plat, dated September 16, 1994 and containing 39 lots, subject to the
fulfillment of requirements specified herein.
Spring Lilly Lane, Larkspur Lane and Greyson Place shall be irrevocably dedicated to the
general public and be constructed to standards of the North Carolina Department of
Transportation. The approval of this resolution authorizes and directs the Orange County
Manager to accept for Orange County and on behalf of the public generally, the offer of
dedication of Spring Lilly Lane, Larkspur Lane and Greyson Place. This acceptance by
Orange County of the dedication to the general public of Spring Lilly Lane, Larkspur Land
and Greyson Place shall be without maintenance responsibility. These roads shall be
maintained by the owner/applicant until such time as they are accepted for maintenance by
the North Carolina Department of Transportation or some other governmental body. Before
the Final Plat of Fox Hill Farm Phase One Section "C" can be recorded:
A. Sewage Disposal
1. Each residential lot shall contain an adequate area for septic disposal, and
repair area, approved by the Orange County Division of Environmental
Health.
2. The septic system location may restrict the size and location of improvements.
This disclosure shall be included in a document describing development
restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. The document
shall also disclose that information regarding the tentative location of septic
systems is available from the Orange County Health Department, Division of
Environmental Health.
B. Roads and Access
1. Spring Lilly Lane (60 foot right-of-way), Larkspur Lane and Greyson Place
shall be constructed to standards of the North Carolina Department of
Transportation, within a 50 foot right-of-way, and the construction shall be
inspected and approved by NCDOT.
4
OR
A letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond shall be submitted to secure
construction of Spring Lilly Lane, Larkspur Land and Greyson Place to the
standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. An estimate of
the construction cost must be prepared by a certified/licensed engineer or
grading contractor and submitted to the Planning and Inspections Department.
The financial guarantee must reflect 110% of that estimate and be issued by an
accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina.
The document describing development restrictions to be recorded with the
Final Plat shall state that the financial guarantee will not be released until the
road construction has been inspected and approved by NCDOT.
2. All lots shall receive access from the internal subdivision roads instead of
Miller Road.
3. At the street rights-of-way intersections, sight-triangles shall be indicated in
accordance with NCDOT design standards.
4. Approved street name signs shall be erected at the intersection as required in
Section IV-B-3-c-12 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. Evidence
shall be submitted by the applicant that the sign is in place or a copy of the
receipt for purchase of the signs shall be submitted to the Planning
Department.
C. Land Use Buffers and Landscaping
1. Landscaping shall be installed or preserved as indicated on the approved
landscape plan, and must be inspected and approved by the Planning and
Inspections Department.
OR
Guaranteed financially through a letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond
submitted to secure required landscape installation and preservation. An
estimate of the cost for required preservation, plantings and their installation
must be provided. The financial guarantee shall reflect 110 percent of the
estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do
business in North Carolina.
2. Provisions for protection of existing trees as shown on the approved landscape
plan shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and
requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with
the Final Plat.
5
E. Parkland
1. Cash in the amount of $2,682.00 [($2,407/acre x 39/35 acre)] shall be paid to
Orange County as payment in lieu of parkland dedication.
F. Miscellaneous
1. The Final Plat shall contain a title block and vicinity map in accordance with
Section V-D-2 and V-D-3 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations.
2. Drainage easements shall be provided as indicated on the Preliminary Plan.
3. A joint driveway agreement shall be prepared for lots 38 and 39 and submitted
with the final plat.
G. Certifications
1. A Certificate of Survey and Accuracy signed by a registered Land Surveyor
shall be notarized on the face of the Final Plat.
2. A Certificate of Declaration and Maintenance in the form provided in Section
V-D-6-b of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations signed by the
landowner and developer shall be on the face of the plat and included in a
document describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with
the Final Plat.
3. The Department of Environmental Health shall certify that all residential lots
contain suitable area for septic disposal.
4. The North Carolina Department of Transportation shall certify that all roads
have been constructed to State standards or that construction plans have been
approved.
5. A Certificate of Approval signed by the Orange County Planning and
Inspections Department.
Signature of Applicant Clerk to the Board
, accept the above listed conditions of subdivision approval,
and acknowledge that each must be met prior to recordation of the final plat.
Applicant Date
APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAN APPROVAL
MAJOR SUBDIVISION 6
ORANGE COUNTY 8/93
DATE: 09/ 16/94
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT (INK ONLY)
SUBDIVISION NAME: FOX HILL FARM ( Phase 'I Section C )
LOCATION: Miller Road ( SR 1555 )
OWNER/DEVELOPER: V i c K n i g h t
ADDRESS: P . O . Box 850 TELEPHONE NO.:732-3521
Hillsborough , NC
AGENT/CONTACT: V i c Knight TELEPHONE NO,:7 3 2-3 5 2 1
A. SUMMARY INFORMATION:
Orange County Tax Map 1 3 Block - Lot(s) 1 4 Township Eno
Zoning District(s): Orange C o u n Ly
Total Number of Acres: bb . /U Acres Phases: ( 4 ) -
Total Number of Lots: Average Lot Size: Minimum Lot RS Y 1 5 4 1 . 00
i/
Number/Type of Structures: (existing) N o D e(', (proposed) II VV//
Lineal Feet in Streets: 3 , 9 3 5 L F Acres in Open Space: N/A
Water Supply: N/A Public (specify) N/A Community Well Individual
Wastewater Disposal: N/A Public (specify) IV/A Community S e Fp L 1 • Individual
School District: Orange (,o u n t y Fire District: t n 0
General Land Uses in Area: A g r 1 c u l t u r a l /R e s 1 d e n t l d l
Critical Areas: N/A stream/drainageways N/A flood prone areas
N/A watershed (specify) N/A historic sites
other (explain) NI/A
Is the property to be subdivided currently under "farm use value taxation"? Yes X No . If "yes",
please contact the Orange County Tax Office. Subdivision of the property may require payment of
deferred taxes under "farm use value taxation". .
B. All plats must be submitted on sheet no smaller than one inch equals two-hundred feet (1"=200') and
no larger than one inch equals twenty feet (1"=20') and must contain the foflowing•information:
X '`:ice:>< subdivision name X
?`7�?> zoning of tract and adjacent
c < name & address of owner(s) properties
N;4.? name & address of subdivider X MI building setback lines by notation
(if other than owner) or typical lot layout
,� X `'` name of surveyor, engineer, X
::<......> location and width of existing and
c landscape architect or architect, '�-
o proposed easements (drainage,
address, registration # and seal
a) utilities, roads, etc.)
w X IR (title) Preliminary Plan X ??existing, proposed and adjoining
X >< `€<i scale, north arrow
rights-of-way including dimensions
c?, x ::1::4:::::' date (including revision dates) and street names and state road
` township, tax map-block-lot numbers. Lineal feet of road
w X ft
references centerlines and approximate
0
, Parent Parcel Identification # acreage of new street rights of-
ai ct . X '%'i ::: deed book and page # of property way
to be subdivided I N/A existing and proposed utilities,
X
221 boundary described with bearings , including type, sizes, hydrants,
E f�i and distances
� � N/ valves, manholes
U c X >'•` i+.:: total acreage of the tract and / existing and proposed curbs,
Y a� acreage of lots, including and gutters and culverts, including
O
Cll CO o excluding area within rights-of- N/A sizes and grades
•C s way
v X :s:sa;: '' 1 ' location and width of alleys,
>.i :::; control corner sidewalks, bike lanes, transit
systems, and bus stops
(please complete reverse side)
X .i"V . proposed lot lines with dimensions __X___ typical street cross-sections and
::•,.,4•:]•.;• lot & block numbers intersection details including
-.'`i%::r phasing lines design and width of travelway and
>, X topography at ten foot (10) shoulders 7
r-' intervals X '.'' '' horizontal alignment and general
os '!?water bodies, streams, floodway X curve data (public roads)
a) and floodplains centerline radius on all proposed
'' N/A €w:4/ stream buffers • streets
N/ n 00A location and size of parcels N/A '{}y ' permanent features such as
U) v dedicated for public use, buildings, cemeteries, historic
E •ri
a) recreational use or reserved in landmarks
•,-I o X common, with purpose noted X ?~ adjoining lot layout names of
-o N ?] >=: impervious surface data (if located adjoining property owners. If
m o in water supply watershed) subdivided, subdivision plat name,
+) 4-i
a) X vicinity ma p showin g general plat book & page number, and
,--1
E N location of subdivision with streets perimeter lot numbers.
N/A li1>i ..
o m and roads identified by State road location and size of lots of
v number and name restricted development potential
'II
v A landscaping and buffer • and notation on plat regarding
ai CO requirements same
.c r
U Cr) ?>) A township, corporate and extra- `< stormwater detention and/or
territorial planning jurisdiction lines retention sites and undisturbed
which cross the property areas for infiltration purposes (if
located in water supply
• watershed)
C. OTHER SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
1. Twenty-five (25) copies of the preliminary plat.
2. One full size copy of an Orange County Tax map (with tax parcels involved clearly marked in
pencil).
3. Where municipal or OWASA sewer is not available, a copy of the Preliminary Plat indicating
Health Department soils analysis approval/denial for each lot shown thereon.
4. Where a private road is proposed a written statement by the applicant or his/her authorized
representative which sets forth the justification for a private road (see Section IV-B-3-d-1 of the
Orange County Subdivision Regulations).
5. Auxiliary documents, in draft form, prepared in accordance with Section•VLof.this Ordinance
which assure completion and/or maintenance of improvements required by this Ordinance.
Such documents may include, but not be limited to, a private road maintenance a�racment, and
articles of incorporation and restrictive covenants pertaining to a homeowner's association.
These documents may be required as necessary as evidence that the ordinance requirements
are being met.
8. Fee - $350.00 plus $5.00 per lot (1 fee for proliminary and final plat).
7. If the subdivision contains 10 lots or more the following information shall be submitted with the
application:
a. Number of years to buildout.
b. Number of houses to be built during each year to buildout.
c. Average price of houses including lots for each year to buildout.
I, the ap•licant, hereby certify that the foregoing application is complete and accurate.
■- •
APPLICANT' SIG- •TURE • OWNER'S SIGNATURE
09/ 16/94
DATE DATE
FEES: Amount 5 Date Paid (J/ R D /4 i Receipt !1 9 1
Fox Hill Farm Phase One Section C
gal 3744 Applicant: Vic Knight
•
Zoning: AR 8
50 Ac. LUP: Agricultural Residential
12.75AC 1
1 \\\ 1
orri/or I JILON 860,0`00
U 11 1765
19. 2 AC.
/,
�>
i I
I
. 796!
il
0 -41( jr I
30.04 A C.
3190 • II
8097
oQ
82 .- N A58000
SAC. II i
932 AG � ��.-1�
1 23
•682 �/ 1A , 0670
5 AC. �/ 1 1 - — - —
68 0476 / 6435 \ \ 3
// 13 1
7.22AC 1 10.03 A
/ 10.354C. \ \
8!94 / // ../
�G3 30 3:5!
N
723 / / 9042_ \5 2.50 AC. 5 _ -3
9939 \--
a //
26.62 AC 31 ,3 G — — — — —
/ 3.79 AC.
/ C • 4890 .
7.2 3 AC. m 2.9 0 4C. 17 J 3743 /
il 7673 48 AL 9678
�� '� W i9 12. ?c• AC. �o 3 3AC /i' � 4560 5561
9
FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR FOX HILL FARM - PHASE I - SECTION C
RESIDENTIAL SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH
Prepared by
The Orange County Planning Department
November, 1994
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Fox Hill Farm, Phase I, Section C,is a proposed 39-lot major subdivision located in Eno Township
on the northwest corner of Baldwin Road and Miller Road.The total area of the subdivision is 65.61 acres,
and the current zoning is Agriculture-Residential.The average lot size is approximately 1.54 acres.All lots
will be served by individual wells and septic tanks, and public roads.
For Fox Hill Farm,Phase I, Section C,project build-out is estimated at three years.Housing units
will be constructed, beginning in 1995, with completion of the project scheduled for 1997.Units will consist
of detached single-family homes, and the applicant estimates the average sales price will be $250,000,
including the lot.
METHODOLOGY
Fiscal impact analysis is a projection of the direct, current, public costs and revenues associated
with residential and non residential growth in the jurisdiction in which the growth is taking place. Fiscal
impact analysis considers only direct impact in that it projects only the primary costs that will be incurred
and the immediate revenues that will be generated. It calculates the financial effect of a planned
development or new subdivision by considering the current costs and revenues such a development would
generate if it were completed and occupied today.Fiscal impact analysis does not consider the private costs
of public action. It is concerned only with public (governmental) costs and revenues.
The method used in preparing the fiscal impact analysis is the Service Standard Approach. While
only gross expenditures by service category are derived from the Per Capita Method,the Service Standard
method determines the total number of additional employees by service function that will be required as
a result of growth. This method employs average county government costs per person, average school
costs per pupil, an employee to population ratio, and average operating expenses per employee for each
service category and school district. The number of new employees are projected and multiplied times the
average operating expenses (includes personnel, operating and capital costs)per employee. These average
costs are then weighed against per capita and per pupil revenues to project the total net fiscal impact of
the development.
10
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH
PROJECT FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Section 1 - Project Data
Project Name, Township, School District
Beginning Year, Ending Year, Inflation
Characteristics of Households
Construction Schedule/Cost Data
Section 2 - Local Government and School District Data
Budget Year
Per Capita Revenues
Per Capita Expenditures
Per Student Expenditures
School District Per Employee Expenditures
Employees Per 1000 Population
County Per Employee Expenditure
Other Data
Other Model Constants
School District Data
Section 3 - Demographic Projections Based On Project Data
Total Housing
Total Population
School Children
Additional County Employees
Total
School District Additional Employees
Section 4 - Projected Net Fiscal Impact on County
Tax Base
Revenues
Expenditures
Net Fiscal Impact
Section 5 - Projected Net Fiscal Impact on School District
Revenues
Expenditures
Net Fiscal Impact
Section 6 - Summary of Projected Impacts
Additional Housing
Additional Population
Additional School Children
Tax Base
County Government Balance
School District Balance
Total Net Fiscal Impact
EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND DATA SOURCES
RESIDENTIAL FISCAL IMPACT TEMPLATE: SERVICE STANDARD METHOD
Bureau of Economic & Business Research — University of Florida 11
Modified 11/5/93 — Orange County,NC Planning Department
SECTION 1 — PROJECT DATA: ENTER THE FOLLOWING DATA FOR EACH PROJECT:
PROJECTi Fox.Hill Farm Phase I Section C ''
TOWNSHIP: Hillsborough/Eno
CONSTRUCTION PERIOD:
Beginn ng Year
,.;1995
Ending Year: 1997
Inflation Rate ' .• 2.90%
CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSEHOLDS:
Persons/Hoese. ....... • 2.57
Children/House: 0.44
%Q Non . Elderly 100.00%.
HOME SALES DATA:
Average Distribution
Number of Sales Price of Units
Year Homes ($) by Year
14.<: 250000.. ...>: ........ . ......>:... ..... ....35.90;
1996 15 250000 38.46%
1997 .. ....::: ..... ..:: ...... :: ....... : . ..14 250000.
1998 0 0 0.00%
2000 0 0 0.00%
2001 fl 0 0 00%a::>
2002 0 0 0.00%
2004
SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: ENTER"1"IN( )BESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT IN WHICH PROJECT IS TO BE
LOCATED TO GENERATE STUDENT DISTRIBUTION BY SCHOOL TYPE.
School District: School Attendance:
Orange County. (.. ;:. .. . ..... . .': Elementary School 50%
Middle School 23%
SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN/HOUSEHOLD: ENTER NUMBER OF UNITS BY HOUSING TYPE TO
GENERAI'h.NUMBER OF SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN.
Children School Age
Housing Type Units Per House Children
Single; Family
::. .. . .::.. . . ....:.... :.:��.... > .. 0.44 17:>
Duplex.'Triplex/Quadplex 0 0 0
Apartment/condominium:. 0. . ! 0 ... 0I
Town House 0 0 0
SECTION 2 — LOCAI,GOVERNMENT A/%1D SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA 12
BUDGET YEAR : • :
. .
COUNTY 100758
STUDENT POPULATION: : : 5444
COUNTY EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER CAPITA
General Government . • 10$.60 -9.0011
Public Safety 134.00 0.0013•
Public Works ••••• •: • •••••• 50.00. • 0 0005
Human Services 24629 0.0024
Edlicgtifitt , --• 0.0072•
SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER STUDENT
•• : • ••••••'•••::;:f •-••. • 0.1334
COUNTY PER CAPITA REVENUES ($): REVENUES PER CAPITA
Taxes- Other Than Property 4127000 40 96
Intergovernmental 8778421 87.12
Service Chare& 2969123 2947
Miscellaneous 787197 7.81
COUNTY PER CAPITA EXPENDITURES ($): EXPENDITURES PER CAPITA
General Government 6251551 6205
Public Safety 5854402 58.10
Human Services 15528989 154.12
Education(Recurrmg Capital) 750000 744
Non—Departmental 2343967 23.26
COUNTY PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURE ($): EXPENDITURES PER EMPLOYEE
Public Safety 5854402 4368957
Human Services 15528989 63051.64
•SCHOOL DISTRICT PER STUDENT EXPENDITURES ($): EXPENDITURES PER STUDENT
County Govermuent. '' . ........ . . . . ....... ........ . . . .7420172 136300
...School District 0 0.00
SCHOOL DISTRICT PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURES ($): EXPENDITURES PER EMPLOYEE
County Government. . . . . . . . . .„ . . 7420172 1022062
School District 0 0.00
TAX DATA: ENTER APPLICABLE ASSESSMENT RATIO AND ELDERLY EXEMPTION:
County Tax Rate ($) 0::7460 ::]:74.::$i10CcAsiessext:Valuaticiti
• School District...Rate ($) 0.0000 Per$100 Assessed Valuation
Assessment Ratio • .
Elderly Ex emption 0 $11,000 Where Applicable
i
13
SECTION 3 - DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA
YEAR
1995; 1996 1997;; 1998 1999
HOUSING UNITS 14 29 39 39 39
POPULATION 36 75 >100 100 •'100
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary -.
Middle
High School 2 3 5 5 S
TOTAL
6' 13 ..-17 17 17
COUNTY GOVERNMENT
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
General Government 0 0< 0.1 -0 1> 0.1 0.:1
Public Safety • 0 0, 0.1 '0 1'' 0.1 0.1'••
Public Works 0 0 0.0 .. .; 0 0: 0.0 0.0<•
Human Services 0 1.: 0.2 0,2 0.2 .;0.2'.•TOTAL , 0 2:i 0.4 0.5 0.5 , . , 0.5
SCHOOL DISTRICT 0 3.. 0.5 0 7 0.7 :0 T
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
YEAR 2000:: 2001 2002 2003 :. 2004:`
HOUSING UNITS
39 39 39; 39 39.
0
POPULATION 10 100 100.; 100 ...::100:
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 8• 8 8: 8 ,' ..8•
Middle 4' 4 :: 4 4 4:•
High School S 5 S. 5
TOTAL 17. 17 `17 17 17
•COUNTY GOVERNMENT :
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES . ::
General Government 01 0.1
Public Safety 01. 0.1 O 1 0.1 ;0.1:
Public Works 0 0 0.0 :0:0 0.0
;: 0:0
Human Services 0 2: 02 0.2 :;0.2
TOTAL 05. 0.5 0S- 0.5 0.5?.
SCHOOL DISTRICT ._.:.. . . : 0 7:• 0.7
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
SECTION 4 — PROJEC:1'ED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON COUNTY GOVERNMENT 14
YEAR .. ,1995 1996 :••1997 is 1998 .1999
TAX BASE ($1000) 3500 7352 10065 10357 . 10657•
REVENUES ($)
Property Tax 26110:: 54842 75083 77260 , 79501
Other Taxes 1474: 3141 4347 4473 . 4603
Intergovernmental 3135:< 6682 9246:• 9514 9790
Service Charges x060:: 2260 3127: 3218 33.11
Miscellaneous 281 599 :829::: 853 - .- .. •••••,. ,.• •
TOTAL ($) 32060 67524 92632:: 95319 • 98083
EXPENDITURES ($)
General Govern ` ;; 4758 6585
ment 2232 ; 6776 6972:
Public Safety 2091',: 4456 6166.; 6345 ;: 6529
Public Works ::986;: 2101 2908,: 2992 3079:
Human Services :5545 11820 16357:; 16831 ' 17319.
Education :: 8664` 18467 25555: 26296 : . .27059
Non—Departmental 837> 1784 2469:: 2540 2614:
20355', 43387 ' 60040:; 61781 `: 63572
TOTAL ($)
NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) : 11:705 24137 32593: 33538 > 34510
20
YEAR 00 2001 : 2flf>2 2003 200.4..':
TAX BASE ($1000) 's 1 0966 11284 ` 11614 11948 12294`•
REVENUES ($)
•Property Tax 81806'; 84178 : 86620 89132 .. 91716:.
Other Taxes
. 4736 4874 ! 5 15';: 5160 5310
Intergovernmental
.:;..:: .... .10074.: 10366 10657._ 10976 : ; 11295:`
Service Charges .3407 3506
:. 36Q8 3713 :: . . ..3820
Miscellaneous `903 930 .. ..95'7; 984 : 1.013:.
:
TOTAL ($) 100927 103854 106866.;: 109965 < .113154
EXPENDITURES ($)
General Government 7174 7382 .. .. :'......'7597.: 7817 ::. $043
Public Safety 6719:; 6913 : 7114;: 7320 75.32`
Public Works 5
3168.:;: 3260 3355::: 3452
.3552
Human Services 17821 18338 1887# 19417 19980
Education
27844>: 28651 !: 29482;; 30337 ' 31:217:
Non—Departmental 2690:: 2768 ; 2848 2931 3016
TOTAL ($) 65416.:: 67313 . .: : 69265.1 71274 ; .: . 73341
NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) 35511` 36541 • 3760.1„...;: 38691 39813
15
SECTION 5 - PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT
YEAR <1995. 1996 1997::: 1998 1999
REVENUES ($)
County 8664 18467 25555: 26296 27059
School District 0 0 0 0 '0
State 19898'' 42412 58691 60393 62144
TOTAL ($) 28562 60879 84246: 86689 89203
EXPENDITURES ($)
County ::: :!8664:< 18467 25555: 26296 ' . 27059
School District 0! 0 .: 0.: 0 . 0'.
State 19898 42412 `5.8691 60393 ;:62144
TOTAL ($) 28562: 60879 84246: 86689 89203
NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) d 0 0: 0 >:' 0
YEAR 2000<: 2001 ::!2002.:: 2003 2004'
REVENUES ($)
• County 2'7$44:: 28651 29482!; 30337 31217
School District fl 0 0. 0 ........ .0
State 63946' 65801 67709; 69673 71693:
TOTAL ($) 91790 94452 9X91?: 100010 : 102910.:•
EXPENDITURES ($)
County 27844 28651 294$2! 30337 31217
School District :: ;;.0:? 0 :; 0
0' 0
State .. :63946': 65801 67709; 69673 . 71693
TOTAL ($) 91790 94452 97191; 100010 102910:
NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) Q:' 0 .. Q. 0 .0<
SECTION 6 — SUMMARY OF PROJECTED DEMOGRAPHIC/FISCALIMPACTS 16
YEAR 1995• 1996 1997..:. 1998 : 1999
HOUSING UNITS 14 29 :39 39 39
POPULATION ': :36 75 100 100 • 100
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 3 6 8 8 8
Middle -:'•:"...•:-...-:::-:::::.H:::..'"......-',''.. ..1 3 4 4 . :4
High School 2 3 5: 5 > 5
TOTAL 6 13 ::::::-...:•::::::-.:.:::....;.....:.:1.7 17 ...' 17
COUNTY EMPLOYEES : 0 2 0.4 ..0.5` 0.5 0.5
SCHOOL EMPLOYEES .:;: 0.3' 0.5 ..,0.7 0.7 . '0..7
TAX BASE($1000) 3500:' 7352 10065 I 10357 • 10657
COUNTY BUDGET(S)
Revenues 32060: 67524 •-•:::::::.:::::....::: ::.::..92632.:,:::, 95319 98083
Expenditures • 20355: 43387 60040 61781 63572:
BALANCE 11705' 24137 • 32593 33538 34510
SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET($)...., .
Revenues 28562;; 60879 84246`: 86689 89203
Expenditures 28562: 60879 84246; 86689 : ::: 89203`
BALANCE 0.. 0 0! 0 0
COMBINED BUDGETS($)
Revenues 6Q621' 128403 176878: 182008 `. 187286
Expenditures
ExP 48917 104266
144286;; 148470 : 152776
BALANCE 11705;', 24137 •32593; 33538 34510:
YEAR 2000: 2001 :::; 2002: 2003 20.04:'
HOUSING UNITS : : 39 39
39 39 39
POPULATION :100 100 100 100 ,00:
SCHOOL CHILDREN -. '.
Elementary 8': 8 8: 8
8:
Middle
'' 4: 4 4 4 4:
High School 5 5 ::S` 5 :. .... 5
TOTAL, 17`: 17 1.7; 17 17`'
COUNTY EMPLOYEES 05:' 0.5
OS: 05 0.5.
SCHOOL EMPLOYEES .0 ? 0.7 0 7.: 0.7 .0 7
TAX BASE($1000) 10966 11284 11611: 11948 ; 12294'
COUNTY BUDGET($)
Revenues : 100927: 103854 106866: 109965 : :;i: 113154<
Expenditures 65416;: 67313 69265.;; 71274 73341;?
BALANCE • 3551.1; 36541 ! 37601': 38691 .. :: 398;13;
SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET($)
Revenues 91790; 94452 :: ;` 97191: 100010 :: 10291.0
Expenditures 91790:; 94452 971911: 100010 1.02910
BALANCE (1 0 i
o: a . o
COMBINED BUDGETS($)
Revenues 192717 198306 < 204057; 209975 ? > 216064
Expenditures 157206: 161765 i 166456:-, 171283 ' 176251
BALANCE 35511: 36541 37601 38691 ' :39813
17
EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND DATA SOURCES
SECTION 1 - PROJECT DATA
Project data includes information about the specific development project. Much, if not all, of the
information is supplied by the applicant. Data inputs include:
Project Name: Name of the project.
Township: Township in which the project is located.
School District: School district in which the project is located.
Beginning Year: The first year of the project in which dwelling units are completed and
occupied.
Ending Year: The last year in which dwelling units are completed and occupied. The template is set to
calculate fiscal impacts for a ten-year period.
Inflation Rate: Unless an inflation rate is entered, the template will calculate fiscal impacts based on
constant dollars. Since the inflation rate changes frequently, the Finance Department must be contacted
for the most recent figure.
Persons/Household:The estimated average number of persons/household(dwelling unit) based on 1990
Census data for the township in which the project is located. This information is supplied by the Planning
Department and will be updated as necessary using population projections and building permit data.
Children/Household: The estimated average number of school age children/household (dwelling unit)
based on 1990 Census data for the township in which the project is located. This information is supplied
by the Planning Department and will be updated as necessary using school membership data.
%Non-Elderly:N.C.General Statutes permit an$11,000 exemption to the elderly and disabled who meet
certain income criteria. In the event that elderly units are part of the project, the percentage of eligible
non-elderly units is entered. The tax base will automatically be adjusted to reflect the exemption.
Number of Homes: The number of dwelling units to be constructed in the project in each year.
Average Sales Price: The average sales price of all dwelling units based on the number and sales price
of dwelling unit types to be constructed in each year.
18
SECTION 2 - LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA
Local government data includes information regarding expenditures required to provide County
services and revenues received based on the approved Orange County budget for the fiscal year in which
the project is considered for approval.All information derived from the approved budget remains constant
throughout a fiscal year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of a new budget.
Local government revenue and expenditure information is compiled on a per capita (per person)
basis. Per capita figures are derived by dividing the total expenditures for a particular service function or
revenue source by the estimated population of Orange County for the year in which the project is
considered for approval. Populations estimates are prepared by the Planning Department.
Data inputs include the following:
Budget Year: The current fiscal year; i.e., 1993-94.
Per Capita Revenues: The sources of revenue by major category are as follows:
Taxes-Other Than Property:Revenues from taxes other than property taxes include those from sales
and use taxes, franchise taxes, and animal taxes.
Intergovernmental Aid: Revenues from this source, in the form of categorical aid or shared-tax
revenues, are provided through State and federal assistance programs.
Service Charges: Service (or user) charges support numerous functions and are charged to those who
voluntarily receive governmental services or use governmental facilities.
Miscellaneous:Miscellaneous revenues include interest earnings on investments, proceeds from license
and permit fees, and all other revenues.
Per Capita Expenditures: Expenditures by major category are as follows:
General Government: Services related to the legislative, administrative, financial, and legal functions
of government.
Public Safety: Law enforcement services and emergency medical services.
Public Works: Efforts related to the maintenance of County-owned property and the provision of
sanitation (solid waste disposal) services.
Human Services: Departments responsible for the provision of health, social, and recreation-related
services.
Education: Orange County supports two school units, the Orange County school system and the Chapel
Hill\Carrboro school system. This category includes appropriations made to the designated school system
for Recurring Capital items. Recurring Capital funds are used for general maintenance,purchase of new
equipment/furnishings and vehicle maintenance.
Non-Departmental: Contributions to agencies providing cultural and social services outside the formal
structure of county government. Other expenditures include equipment replacement and contingency
funds. Although there are no employees generated by this category, it has been included as an operating
expenditure. It will be included in Section 4, "Total Annual County Expenditure." These expenditures will
be calculated on a per capita basis as opposed to a per employee basis.
19
Per Student Expenditures:Information regarding expenditures required to provide educational services
and revenues received are based on the approved school system budgets for the fiscal year in which the
project is considered for approval. All information derived from the approved budgets remains constant
throughout a fiscal year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of new budgets.
Expenditure information is compiled on a per student basis for County Government Current Expense,
School District and State appropriations. County Government Current Expense funds are used for general
operation purposes including Instruction and Support Services. Federal revenues and expenditures and
other local revenues such as Fund Balance have not been included since they are not directly growth
related. Per student figures are derived by dividing the total appropriation for educational purposes from
a particular source by the estimated number of students to be enrolled in the applicable school system for
the year in which the project is considered for approval. Student enrollments are obtained from the
approved school system budgets.
County Government: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations to the school systems
by Orange County for Current Expense. The minimum level of per student appropriation is determined
by the State Board of Education.
School District:Expenditures in this category are unique to the Chapel Hill-Carrboro school system and
are based on the level of expenditures possible through assessment of a supplementary school tax.
State: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations from the State Board of Education.
School District Per Employee Expenditure: Expenditures per employee based on County, School
District and State appropriations, and the total number of school district employees.
Employees Per 1000 Population: The number of employees in a particular service category per 1000
population.
County Per Employee Expenditure: The average operating and capital expenses per employee in a
particular service category. Total expenses in each category includes personnel,operating and capital costs.
Other Data:
County Government Tax Rate: The County tax rate per $100 of assessed valuation. Since the per
capita method focuses only on operating expenditures, the tax rate is reduced by an amount equal to the
debt service payments from property taxes for capital projects.
School District Tax Rate:The supplementary tax assessed on behalf of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro school
system.
Assessment Ratio: The ratio of market (sales) value to assessed value based on information supplied by
the Tax Office. The assessment ratio is used to convert market value to assessed value for the purpose
of computing the tax base.
Other Model Constants
Elderly Exemption:For projects developed partially or exclusively for elderly(65 and older) or disabled
individuals whose annual income does not exceed$12,000, an$11,000 tax exemption is used in projecting
the tax base.
School District Employees Per Student: The number of employees per student in a specific school
district.
20
SECTION 3 - DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA
Demographic projections provide information about the number of new residents and school children
anticipated in Orange County resulting from project development.Projections also provide the number of
additional employees required per service function and school district as a result of the new development.
Total Housing Units: The cumulative total of new housing units added each year by project
development.
Total Population: The total population added each year by a project derived by multiplying the number
of homes to be constructed by the number of persons per household (see Section 1).
School Population: The total number of school children added each year by a project derived by
multiplying the number of homes constructed by the number of children per household (see Section 1).
Additional County Employees: The number of additional employees required per service category
based on project development.
Total: Total of all additional county employees required based on project development.
School District Additional Employees: The number of additional employees required per school
district based on the project development.
SECTION 4 - PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON COUNTY
Tax Base: The tax base represents the increase in assessed property value expected each year resulting
from project development.The values shown are in$1,000's and are derived from a formula which includes
the number and sales price of homes, and the assessment ratio. Where applicable, the percentage of
non-elderly units and elderly exemption are also used.
Revenues:All revenues are derived from a formula which multiplies the per capita revenues (Section 2)
times the projected population (Section 3). The exception to this is the property tax which multiplies the
tax base times the county government tax rate.
Expenditures: All expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies the per employee
expenditure (Section 2) times the number of additional employees (Section 3).
Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures and
projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs Orange County more to provide services
to a project than it receives in revenues. A positive net balance indicates that more revenues are received
than it costs to serve a project. Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset negative
balances in another.
21
SECTION 6 - PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Revenues: The County contribution is derived by transferring education expenditures by County
government(Section 4).Revenues derived from the school district tax are derived by multiplying the school
district tax times the tax base. State revenues are derived by multiplying the per student expenditure
figure times the total projected number of school children (Section 3).
Expenditures: Expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies each per student
expenditure (Section 2) times the total projected number of school children (Section 3) and adding the
results.
Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures and
projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs the school system more to provide
educational services for children in a project than it receives in revenues.A positive net balance indicates
that more revenues are received than it costs to serve a project. Positive net balances in one project may
thus be used to offset negative balances in another.
SECTION 6 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED IMPACTS
22
HOUSEHOLD OCCUPANCY CHARACTERISTICS FOR ORANGE COUNTY, NC
BY TOWNSHIP
(1 .. ....(2 (4)... (5)
Age.
c
hildren Children School Age : School :>
Number Persons Persons Under 18. Under 18' Children: children
wi Ili Per ..
;In ,Per 'In.-Per
Township. ...Households. ;Households >Household Households.:: :Household Households Household `,
1990 CENSUS
Bingham 2156 5177 2 4Q I122 Q 52 721 0.33
Cedar Grove 1345 3676 2.73 865 0.64 624 0.46
Cheeks 2036 5422 2.66 1340 0.66 999 0.49
lna ... ... 203 ..
0.44
Hillsborough 3811 9816 2.58 2567 0.67 1777 0.47
Little:!Rivez 777. ;2183 281,!:. 580. 0.75 4fl2.. 0.52
Orange County 36104 84627 2.34 17698 0.49 12399 0.34
1980 CENSUS
62 0.56
Cedar Grove 1176 3166 2.69 919 0.78 N/A 0.66
Cha
Cheeks 1693 4821 2.85 1466 0.87 N/A 0.70
Hillsborough 3233 8599 2.66 2421 0.75 N/A 0.65
Littlei River 576 :<: 1493 2 59': 443 Q 77. NfA 0.64
Orange County 28707 77055 2.68 15879 0.55 N/A N/A
NOTES: (1)Number of households included under 1980 Census data is number of housing units.
(2)Persons in households included 1980 Census data includes population in households as well as group quarters.
(3)Number of children under 18 years of age includes children living in group quarters due to lack of breakdown
by household in available Census data.
(4)Data not available from 1980 Census.
(5)1980 data calculated using demographic multipliers from "The New Practitioner's Guide to Fiscal Impact
Analysis"by Burchell,listokin,and Dolphin.
23
GENERAL FUND REVENUES - FY 1993-94 ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET
1993 ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION 100758
% OF % OF PER CAPITA
TYPE AMOUNT SUBTOTAL TOTAL REVENUE
PROPERTY TAXES
Current:TTaxes $36,1.19,679 98.33%. 67.64% • :$358.48
Delinquent Taxes $475,000 1.29% 0.89% $4.71
Interest!on Delinquentlaxes :; $140000 0.38% 0,26% $1.39:
Late Listings $0 0.00% 0.00% $0.00
Vehicle:List Penalties . ?' . .... : $0 0.00% 0,00% $0.00:
SUBTOTAL $36,734,679 100.00% 68.80% $364.58
OTHER LOCAL TAXES
Sales and Use Tax .. $3,950,009 95 71% fi 40°,� -: $39.20
Privilege License Tax N/A 0.00% 0.00% $0.00
Franchise Tax : $107,000 : 259% 0.20% $1:06
Animal Tax $70,000 1.70% 0.13% $0.69
SUBTOTAL $4,127,000 100.00% 7.73% $40.96
INTERGOVERNMENTAL
Intangilb€es Tax $2,073,000 : 23 61% 3.88% $20 57
Beer&Wine Tax $157,437 1.79% 0.29% $1.56
Health:`.:.. ... . :.. . $389,063 073%... .... ........ ..$386;?
Social Services $4,523,440 51.53% 8.47% $44.89
]Aging/CAF :;... ..: $320,535:. 365%... 0.60%. . .:.:;.. ... $3.18;;;
Other State $789,946 9.00% 1.48% $7.84
Local .. <:$525,011 598% 0:.98% . $5:21''
SUBTOTAL $8,778,421 100.00% 16.44% $87.12
•
SERVICE CHARGES
ReglsterTQf Deeds !$911v,„14:::::::::::::::::::::,:?:::,,,:::::;,-...00;71% 1 71'% $905:
Land Records
$30,975 1.04% 0.06% $0.31
Planning Fees :$92000. 310% 017% $0 91:.:
Sheriff $767,213 25.84% 1.44% $7.61
::;EMS
.«:$163 620 ...... . .:....8.51% .......... 4 3t:% .< . .$1:62:
APS Fees $4,200 0.14% 0.01% $0.04
.Health : $534768. 18 0144...... . 1 aQ%..... ... ..... . ; ....$5 31
Social Services $38,000 1.28% 0.07% $0.38
:;Aging/CAT >.
; ,$191,965:: 6 47% ' 036% $1.91
Recreation& Parks $63,412 2.14% 0.12% $0.63
Tax CvlfeCEiQn Charges : : :$72,000 242.% 013`« $0 71..
Miscellaneous Charges $99,068 3.34% 0.19% $0.98
SUBTOTAL $2,969,123 100.00% 5.56% $29.47
24
GENERAL FUND REVENUES - FY 1993-94 ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET
(CONTINUED)
1993 ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION 100758
% OF % OF PER CAPITA
TYPE AMOUNT SUBTOTAL TOTAL REVENUE
MISCELLANEOUS
Interest Earnings• . . . $3t0000 3938% 058% $3.08
Licenses&Permits $230,700 29.31% 0,43% $2.29
All Other:Revenue.... . $246,497! '3'1.31%. 0'.46% .$2.45:
SUBTOTAL $787,197 100.00% 1.47% $7.81
FUND TOTAL $53,396,420 100.00% 100.00% $529.95
Source:FY 1993-94 Approved Budget,Orange County, N.C.
25
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES— FY 1993—94 ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET
1993 ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION 100758
% OF % OF PER CAPITA
TYPE AMOUNT SUBTOTAL TOTAL EXPENSE
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
Commissioners< $304,.099 4.86% 059% $3.02
Courts $11,000 0.18% 0.02% $0.11
E€actions $261,283 41:8% 0.5196 . .. $2.59.
Manager $521,356 8.34% 1.01% $5.17
Personnel $357,1.33 5.71%.. , 06990 . $3.54.
Budget $148,268 2.37% 0.29% $1.47
Finance ;$239,849 3.84% 047% $2.38
Purchasing $159,082 2.54% 0,31% $1.58
Data Processing $425,353 $4.22
B SO% 4 83%
Central Services $653,144 10.45% 1.27% $6.48
Regrster:af Deeds $589,44.
1'4% $5.85
1 is
Tax Assessor $723,433 11.57% 1.40% $7.18
Tax Collector $310,467 4.97% 0.60% $3.08•frig&lnspeations $1,232,008. 19,71% 2 39% $12.23:-
SUBTOTAL $6,251,551 100.00% 12.14% $62.05
PUBLIC SAFETY
<,Sheriff $3 842197 S5 63% 7 46% $38.1:3'
Domestic Valence $38,188 0.65% 0.07% $0.38
SUBTOTAL $5,854,402 100.00% 1137% $58.10
PUBLIC WORKS
Euildags&Grounds .. `: $1,507,002 .: 54 59% 2 93`Y� . $14.96
Other $177,134 6.42% 0.34% $1.76
Motor Pool $72,3:7 262% 014% $0.72':
Sanitation $1,004,204 36.37% 1.95% $9.97
SUBTOTAL $2,760,727 100.00% 5.36% $27.40
HUMAN SERVICES
Soi€.&.Water $162,528: 105% 032% $161
Economic Development $187,691 1.21% 0.36% $1.86
SocialSeMces :; $9,x96,043 5921' 1786% $91.26.
Health $3,367,943 21.69% 6.54% $33.43
Agricultural Extension $269,945 1 74% . 052% $268:
Recreation& Parks $542,847 3.50% 1.05% $5.39
CAT $407,979 2.63% 0.79% $4.05
Commission for Women. $73,406 0 47% 014% ....... .... ... $0.73;
Library $393,934 2.54% 0.76% $3.91
Child Sa
$411,559 2.6596 . .. a,8o% <: $4.08
SUBTOTAL $15,528,989 100.00% 30.15% $154.12
26
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES- FY 1993-94 ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET
(CONTINUED)
1993 ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION 100758
% OF % OF PER CAPITA
TYPE AMOUNT SUBTOTAL TOTAL EXPENSE
EDUCATION
Current Expense
Orange;CountK ; $7,4201:72: 39.56% 14,4.1% $73.64'
Chapel Hiil $9,838,134 52.45% 19.10% $97.64
Recurring Capital
Orange.County $750,000: 4.0 1..4694,. $7.44
Chapel Hill $750,000 4.00% 1.46% $7.44
SUBTOTAL $18,758,306 100.00% 36.43% $186.17
NON—DEPARTMENTAL
Agency C'ontribut�ons $1;893 978;; 80 80% 3 68% $1880
Fund Tranfers $15,000 0.64% 0.03% $0.15
M tsceNarteous
SUBTOTAL $2,343,967 100.00% 4.55% $23.26
FUND TOTAL $51,497,942 100.00% 100.00% $511.11
Source:FY 1993-94 Approved Budget,Orange County, N.C.
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES- FY 1993-94 ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET 27
1993 ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION 100758
PERMANENT FTE % OF % OF POSITIONS
FUNCTION POSITIONS SUBTOTAL TOTAL PER CAPITA
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
- Commissioners :!; 3.225 2.97% • 0.1596 ::. 0.00003,
Courts N/A 0.00% 0.00% 0.00000
: Elections 3.500 322% O 16% 0.00003-
Manager 8.000 7.37% 0.37% 0.00008
Personnel 6.000 5.53%.. ... 0:28% 0.00006'
Budget 3.000 2.76% 0.14% 0.00003
Finance : 5.000 4 6096 0.23% 0.00005:
Purchasing 3.000 2.76% 0.14% 0.00003
Data Processing 5 370. .. ...::. 494% 0 25% ? 0.000051
Central Services 3.000 2.76% 0.14% 0.00003
Register of Deeds " : 14750 ... . 1358% 0 68% is 0.000t5
Tax Assessor 18.000 16.58% 0.84% 0.00018
Land Reoords 6 000 553% 028% 000006
Tax Collector 6.000 5.53% 0,28% 0.00006
Planning&inspections ::: :............................. 23.750 '... 21.87%.: 1 :T0% ;:i 4:66624::
SUBTOTAL 108.595 100.00% 5.04% 0.00108
•
PUBLIC SAFETY
::;Sheriff . ` 85.500 ,::.. 63 81% 3;97% . 0.00085:
Domestic Violence 1.000 0.75% 0.05% 0.00001
Emergency Services....
4 7500 . 35.45% 2.21% .... 0 00047::
SUBTOTAL 134.000 100.00% 6.22% 0.00133
PUBLIC WORKS
Buildings&(3roiunds 28.040 : 5800% 1 30% 0 00028
Other N/A 0.00% 0.00% 0.00000
Motor Pool..... . 5000 1000% 0 23% 0 00005;
Sanitation 17,000 34.00% 0.79% 0,00017
SUBTOTAL 50.000 100.00% 2.32% 0.00050
HUMAN SERVICES
sows,:Water #000 162.% 01996 000004:
Economic Development 3.000 1.22% 0.14% 0,00003
SooialSennces: ' 107100 4349% 497% 000106::
Health 69.650 28.28% 3.23% 0.00069
Agricultural Extenswn 9.750 396% 0 45% 00001:0'
•
Recreation& Parks 11.375 4.62% 0.53% 0.00011
Aging..::: ....... 10450 ;.. . .4 2496 0:49% 0 00010:
CAT 10.515 4.27% 0.49% 0.00010
Commission forWome - 4.750 Q 71% 0:08% 0 00002:
Library 8.700 3.53% 0.40% 0.00009
Child Support : : :.: .10.000 4.0696 0;-4696 ! 0.00010.
SUBTOTAL 246.290 100.00% 11.44% 0.00244
28
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES- FY 1993-94 ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET
(CONTINUED)
1993 ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION 100758
PERMANENT FTE % OF % OF POSITIONS
FUNCTION POSITIONS SUBTOTAL TOTAL PER CAPITA
EDUCATION
Orange County •'<- >: :726.000> 44.97% 33.72% ;:0.00721`;
Chapel Hill 888.410 55.03% 41,26% 0.00882
SUBTOTAL 1614.410 100.00% 74.97% 0.01602
FUND TOTAL 2153.295 100.00% 100.00% 0.02137
Source: FY 1993-94 Approved Budget, Orange County, N.C.
29
Date: November 8, 1994 HAND DELIVERED
To : Orange County Planing Department
306F Revere Road
Hillsborough, NC 27278
Attn: Mr. Eddie Kirk
Subject: Impact Statement - Phase I Section C - FOX HILL FARM
Dear Eddie,
This letter is written in an effort to respond to your recent requests
concerning the Impact of the proposed 39 lot subdivision of Phase I
Section C of Fox Hill Farm.
We anticipate that this will be sufficient infoLluation to answer your
questions as it pertains to the Orange County Subdivision Ordinance
1) The likely value of the homes when complete on the proposed 39
lots of Phase I Section C will typically range in value between
approximately $200 , 000 to $300 , 000 .
This range of values are based on our extensive covenants
which all future owners will be required to abide by when
constructing their new homes. These construction standards
coupled with the lot values establish this likely value range.
The lower value range is likely to be achieved only for those
properties which construct homes which meet the absolute minimum
standards set by our Design Review Committee.
2) The anticipated absorption rate of the 39 lots in Phase I
Section C will be based on approximately all 10 lots within
phasing section C-1 sold and approximately 4 lots within
phasing section C-2 sold in the first year, and the remaining
approximately 4 lots within phasing section C-2 sold and all of
phasing section C-3 sold in the second year. The remaining lots
in phasing section C-4 will likely be sold during the third year
(therefore, 1 . 25 lots sold each month, after all improvements to
Section C are complete) . Therefore, within 3 years Phase I
Section C will likely be absorbed by the Market.
If you have any additional questions please give me a call 932-9908, I
will be glad to supply additional information to you or others within
the Planning department as necessary.
Thank you for your assistance with these matters .
Sinc rely yours,
Vic Knight
DRAFT NOVEMBER 21, 1994 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES 30
VOTE: Unanimous.
b. Preliminary Plans
( 1) Fox Hill Farm - Phase I/Section C
( 39 Lots Eno/Hillsborough Townships)
Presentation by Eddie Kirk.
The property is located in Eno Township on the
north side of Miller Road (SR 1555) at the
intersection with Baldwin Road (SR 1554 ) . Miller
Road is a paved state-maintained road, however,
Baldwin is an unpaved state-maintained road. A
1992 traffic count on Miller Road indicated
150 trips per day. Baldwin Road had a traffic
count of 80 trips per day in 1992 . The proposed
road will be directly across Miller Road from
Meadow Wind Lane. Meadow Wind Lane extends south
off Miller Road and was in the first phase of Fox
Hill Farm.
The total acreage of the area to be subdivided is
65. 61 . Thirty-nine ( 39) lots are proposed which
average 1.54 acres in size. All lots will be
served by individual wells and septic tanks. The
first phase of Fox Hill Farm was approved in 1992
and is located on the west side of Baldwin Road
south of Miller Road. Section A of the second
phase received preliminary approval on October 4 ,
1993. A final plat has been submitted for this
phase.
The property is zoned Agricultural Residential
(AR) . It is also designated Agricultural
Residential in the Comprehensive Plan. Public
roads are proposed to serve the subdivision.
The Planning Board approved the Concept Plan for
Fox Hill Farm Phase One Section C on July 18,
1994 subject to the following conditions:
1. All lots shall receive access from the
internal roads instead of Miller Road.
2 . As a condition of preliminary plan approval
and included in the Resolution of Approval, a
proposed general plan of the overall
development shall be submitted with the
concept plan of the next phase. To the
extent that a reasonable estimate of the
information can be obtained, this plan should
indicate an overall parcel boundary of the
area to be developed, approximate acreage and
31
density in each phase, and estimate of time
period for each phase, and the location of
collector roads in the development.
Agency comments were received from Environmental
Health, Soil & Water Conservation, Emergency
Management, Recreation and Parks, County
Attorney, Erosion Control, and NCDOT. Applicable
comments have been incorporated into the
Resolution of Approval.
The Planning Staff recommends approval of the
Preliminary Plan for Fox Hill Farm Phase One
Section C subject to the conditions contained in
the Resolution of Approval (copy an attachment
to these minutes on pages ) .
Burklin asked when the Board would see the
overall plan for Fox Hill Farm. Kirk responded
the overall plan will be presented with the next
concept plan. Burklin continued that it is very
difficult to determine how one phase relates to
the other, particularly regarding the streets .
Barrows asked about the impact letter. Kirk
responded that it addresses question C 7 on the
application which is:
If the subdivision contains 10 lots or more the
following information shall be submitted with the
application:
a. Number of years to buildout .
b. Number of houses to be built during each year
to buildout.
c. Average price of houses including lots for
each year to buildout .
MOTION: Burklin moved approval as recommended by the
Planning Staff. Seconded by Hoecke.
VOTE: Unanimous.
(2 ) Black Walnut Farm
(24 Lots - Eno Township)
Presentation by Eddie Kirk.
The property is located on the east side of
Baldwin Road (SR 1554 ) at the intersection of
Baldwin and St. Mary's Road (SR 1002 ) in Eno
Township. It is zoned Agricultural Residential
and designated Agricultural Residential in the
Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
RESOLUTION a �
OF THE VI
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Date December 5, 1994
Name of Subdivision Fox Hill Farm Phase One Section "C"
Owner/Applicant Randolph D. Fox
The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves Fox Hill Farm Phase One Section C
subdivision preliminary plat, dated September 16, 1994 and containing 39 lots, subject to the
fulfillment of requirements specified herein.
Spring Lilly Lane, Larkspur Lane and Greyson Place shall be irrevocably dedicated to the
general public and be constructed to standards of the North Carolina Department of
Transportation. The approval of this resolution authorizes and directs the Orange County
Manager to accept for Orange County and on behalf of the public generally, the offer of
dedication of Spring Lilly Lane, Larkspur Lane and Greyson Place. This acceptance by
Orange County of the dedication to the general public of Spring Lilly Lane, Larkspur Land
and Greyson Place shall be without maintenance responsibility. These roads shall be
maintained by the owner/applicant until such time as they are accepted for maintenance by
the North Carolina Department of Transportation or some other governmental body. Before
the Final Plat of Fox Hill Farm Phase One Section "C" can be recorded:
A. Sewage Disposal
1. Each residential lot shall contain an adequate area for septic disposal, and
repair area, approved by the Orange County Division of Environmental
Health.
2. The septic system location may restrict the size and location of improvements.
This disclosure shall be included in a document describing development
restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. The document
shall also disclose that information regarding the tentative location of septic
systems is available from the Orange County Health Department, Division of
Environmental Health,
B. Roads and Access
1. Spring Lilly Lane (60 foot right-of-way), Larkspur Lane and Greyson Place
shall be constructed to standards of the North Carolina Department of
Transportation, within a 50 foot right-of-way, and the construction shall be
inspected and approved by NCDOT.
2
OR
A letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond shall be submitted to secure
construction of Spring Lilly Lane, Larkspur Land and Greyson Place to the
standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. An estimate of
the construction cost must be prepared by a certified/licensed engineer or
grading contractor and submitted to the Planning and Inspections Department.
The financial guarantee must reflect 110% of that estimate and be issued by an
accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina.
The document describing development restrictions to be recorded with the
Final Plat shall state that the financial guarantee will not be released until the
road construction has been inspected and approved by NCDOT.
2. All lots shall receive access from the internal subdivision roads instead of
Miller Road.
3. At the street rights-of-way intersections, sight-triangles shall be indicated in
accordance with NCDOT design standards.
4. Approved street name signs shall be erected at the intersection as required in
Section IV-B-3-c-12 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. Evidence
shall be submitted by the applicant that the sign is in place or a copy of the
receipt for purchase of the signs shall be submitted to the Planning
Department.
C. Land Use Buffers and Landscaping
1. Landscaping shall be installed or preserved as indicated on the approved
landscape plan, and must be inspected and approved by the Planning and
Inspections Department.
OR
Guaranteed financially through a letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond
submitted to secure required landscape installation and preservation. An
estimate of the cost for required preservation, plantings and their installation
must be provided. The financial guarantee shall reflect 110 percent of the
estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do
business in North Carolina.
2. Provisions for protection of existing trees as shown on the approved landscape
plan shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and
requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with
the Final Plat.
3
E. Parkland
t 1. Cash in the amount of $2,682.00 [($2,407/acre x 39/35 acre)] shall be paid to
Orange County as payment in lieu of parkland dedication.
F. Miscellaneous
1. The Final Plat shall contain a title block and vicinity map in accordance with
Section V-D-2 and V-D-3 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations.
2. Drainage easements shall be provided as indicated on the Preliminary Plan.
3. A joint driveway agreement shall be prepared for lots 38 and 39 and submitted
with the final plat.
G. Certifications
1. A Certificate of Survey and Accuracy signed by a registered Land Surveyor
shall be notarized on the face of the Final Plat.
2. A Certificate of Declaration and Maintenance in the form provided in Section
V-D-6-b of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations signed by the
landowner and developer shall be on the face of the plat and included in a
document describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with
the Final Plat.
3. The Department of Environmental Health shall certify that all residential lots
contain suitable area for septic disposal.
4. The North Carolina Department of Transportation shall certify that all roads
have been constructed to State standards or that construction plans have been
approved.
5. A Certificate of Approval signed by the Orange County Planning and
Inspections Department. de
a....0_,e0 . ,),,,,L....,_ /.), 14') (_
i.
Signature of pplicant C1:�° to the Board
I, n6)6 \ ..D. Fox , accept the above listed conditions of subdivision approval,
and acknowledge that each must be met prior to recordation of the final plat.
, zil a---1,--e..41-"--- ie-) ---7 -0y /e'l- r3 7--) Y
Applicant Date