Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda - 06-23-1988
PAGE 1 APPROVED 2/6/89 MINUTES ORANGE COUNTY 'BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSIONS ON THE PROPOSED BOND ISSUE JUNE 23, 1988 JUNE 29, 1988 The Orange County Board of Commissioners met in special session on June 23, 1988 at 4:00 p.m. in the Commissioners' Conference Room, Court Street Annex, Hillsborough, North Carolina for the purpose of holding a work session on considering a proposed bond issue. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Shirley E. Marshall and Commissioners Moses Carey, Jr. , Stephen Halkiotis, John Hartwell and Don Willhoit. STAFF PRESENT: County Manager John M. Link, Jr. , Assistant County Managers William T. Laws and Albert Kittrell, Recreation and Parks Director Mary Anne Black, Clerk to the Board Beverly A. Blythe, Finance Director Ellen Liston and Budget Analyst Donna Wagner. EXECUTIVE SESSION Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis to go into Executive Session for discussion of property acquisition. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. Motion was made by Commissioner Halkiotis, seconded by Commissioner Carey to go back into special session. - VOTE: UNANIMOUS. DISCUSSION ON THE PROPOSED, BOND ISSUE County Manager John Link presented and explained two scenarios with one totaling twenty-five million with eighteen million for schools and seven for county projects and one totaling thirty million with twenty-one million for schools and nine million for county projects. Commissioner Marshall stated with reference to swimming pools the need to have some figures for building a community pool and also for building a pool at one of the high schools. Commissioner Halkiotis expressed concern that the rural education center is scheduled so late in the GIP, stating that the whole concept needs to be taken back to the simple structure that was first envisioned. The cost does not include moving the agricultural extension office. It was the consensus of the Board that the replacement of the Efland multipurpose center needs to be on the list. Finance Director Ellen Liston described the financial aspect of both scenarios. A thirty million bond issue would increase taxes by 3.1 cents. A twenty-five million bond issue would increase taxes by 2.25 cents. Discussion ensued on which items would be included in a bond issue and if the bond issue should be twenty-five or thirty million. It was agreed to include something for water resources. PAGE 2 There was a consensus of the Board to go with a thirty million dollar bond issue. Discussion ensued on how the bond issue funds would be allocated to the two school districts. John Link suggested allocating on the same percentage as the requests that were received. With a twenty-five million dollar bond issue, 59.4 % or eleven million would go to Chapel Hill/Carrboro School District and 41.6% or seven million to Orange County Schools. With a thirty million dollar bond issue it would mean 12.5 million for Chapel Hill/Carrboro and 8.5 million for Orange County Schools. Their was a consensus of the Board that this was a reasonable split. Superintendent of Orange County Schools Dan Lunsford expressed concern for meeting the remainder of the needs that would not be paid by the bond monies stating it was crucial to recognize the need for the second elementary school. Ted Parrish, Chair of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro School Board questioned if the schools should not get more money and the county projects less money. In response, Chair Marshall emphasized that the telephone survey indicated that the schools are not the only priority and there is a lot that needs to be balanced. It was decided that a thirty million dollar bond issue would be presented for public comment at a public hearing to be held on July 5 at 7:30 in Superior Courtroom, Hillsborough, North Carolina. A special meeting will be held on July 7, 1988 at 7:30 p.m. in the courtroom of the old Post Office, Chapel Hill, North Carolina for the purpose of (1) adopting a resolution authorizing submission of application for issuance of Bonds to Local Government Commission, (2) hiring bond counsel, (3) making final decisions on amount and projects to be included in a bond issue and (4) continuing any items left from the July 5 meeting. Discussion on the bond counsel resulted in a consensus to stay with the same bond counsel in New York. With no further discussion, Chair Marshall adjourned the meeting. Shirley E. Marshall, Chair Beverly A. Blythe, Clerk MINUTES ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION ON THE PROPOSED BOND ISSUE JUNE 29, 1988 The Orange County Board of Commissioners met in Special Session on June 29, 1988 at 4:00 p.m. in the Commissioners' Conference Room, Court Street Annex, Hillsborough, North Carolina for the purpose of holding a work session on the proposed bond issue. PAGE 3 BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Shirley E. Marshall and Commissioners Moses Carey, Jr. , Stephen Halkiotis, John Hartwell and Don Willhoit. ATTORNEY PRESENT: Geoffrey Gledhill. STAFF PRESENT:, County Manager John M. Link, Jr. , Assistant County Managers William T. Laws and Albert Kittrell, ,Recreation and Parks Director Mary Anne Black, Clerk to the Board Beverly A. Blythe, Budget Analyst Donna Wagner. County Manager John Link reviewed certain specific projects as listed in the CIP. He noted that the square foot cost originally contained in the CIP would be changed somewhat from those original figures. He distributed a handout which listed the County capital projects that would be funded from the bond and those that would be funded from the pay-as-you-go monies. He explained the projects as listed below: SOUTHERN HUMAN SERVICES BUILDING - the three million dollar figure reflects a decrease in the square foot cost and the inflation factor was cut from five years to two years. TAX AND RECORDS BUILDING - the 2.8 million was decreased to 1.5 million which deletes those offices of finance, personnel, Board of Commissioners and County Manager. After further discussion this figures was revised to 2.7 million. ANIMAL SHELTER - the $435,000 was reduced to $300,000 which reflects a decrease in the square foot cost. Bill Laws explained that the square foot cost for 14,000 square feet would be $75.00 per square foot. Commissioner Halkiotis suggested that the entire facility be studied very carefully and any kind of redesign should include some adequate office space. 911 CENTER - the $200,000 listed for this project will not cover the entire cost of this project. Additional funds will be needed. After further discussion this figure was revised to $300,000. POOLS - the options were discussed -- two community pools, two school pools or one of each and the different needs which exist in the two areas of the County. Mary Anne Black stated that the minimum pool size is a 25 yard pool. The estimated cost is 1.3 million without any auxiliary facilities. These facilities would cost an additional $270,000. The Board agreed that there is a need for swimming pools. The question is how they should be funded. John Link pointed out that in order to pay for the pools as a pay-as-you-go item, it would be necessary to make deletions from the list. Concern was expressed that one bad item on the bond issue may determine the outcome of the other items on the bond issue. Questionable items for the bond issue included the pools and the land acquisition for the reservoir. Commissioner Willhoit emphasized that the County needs to be in a position to acquire land as it becomes available. The land could be used for recreational purposes until the reservoir is needed. Those in Economic Development will support this because water is needed for economic growth. The intent must be that the revenues from the water will pay for the reservoir. Discussion ensued on water resources and whether or not to put on the bond issue an amount for land acquisition for a reservoir. PAGE 4 After further discussion it was decided that the bond issue would consist of twenty-one million for schools, eight million for public buildings and one million for land acquisition for a reservoir. This would be presented for public comment on July 5. Motion was made by Commissioner Hartwell, seconded by Commissioner Carey to present a bond package totaling thirty million for receipt of public comments on July 5, 1988. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. BUDGET AMENDMENT Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis to approve an amendment to the 1987-88 Budget Ordinance by the following change: GENERAL FUND Appropriation - Health $4,314 Source - Intergovernmental Health $4,314 Appropriation - Health -$2,059 Source - Intergovernmental Health -$2,059 VOTE: UNANIMOUS. With no further items to be considered or discussed, Chair Marshall adjourned the meeting. Shirley E. Marshall, Chair Beverly A. Blythe, Clerk +� BUDGET ORDINANCE 1988-89 ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina. SECTION I. BUDGET ADOPTION 1988-89 There is hereby adopted the following Operating Budget for the County of Orange for this fiscal year beginning July 1, 1988 and ending June 30, a89, the same being adopted by fund and activi±y, within each fund, according to the following y ESTIMATED INTERFUND FUND BALANCE FUND REVENUE TRANSFER APPROPRIATED APPROPRIATION General 36,190, 157 0 481,800 36,671,957 County Capital 11029,400 0 1,029,400 Reserve Equipment Replacement 481,800 0 481,800 Reserve Revaluation 17,000 0 17,000 Fire Districts: 39,000 39,000 Cedar Grove 600 9000 ' Chapel Hill 600 65 804 Efland 56,804 , 9? 675 9 7,675 , Eno 33,319 Little River 30,420 2,899 86720 8,330 95,050 , New Hope 920,250 Orange Rural 92,250 53,800 Orange Grove 53,000 138,853 South Orange 138,853 38,500 Southern Triangle 38,500 11,500 Damascus 11,500 60,000 White Cross 60,000 Data Processing 67,000 Enterprise 6?,OQO Emergency Services - 351,019 In-Flight 351,019 Section II. APPROPRIATION: That for said fiscal year there is hereby appropriated out of the funds the following: APPROPRIATION FUNCTION APPROPRIATION FUNCTION General Fund: Revaluation Fund: Community Maintenance 519,667 Reserve for Revaluation 17,000 General Administration 11 857,414 Fire Districts: Taxation and Records 1,676,758 Community Planning 971,321 39,000 Human Services 7,806,540 Cedar Grove 600 Public Safety 3,788,268 Chapel Hill 65,804 Public Works 1,948,813 Efland 97,675 Education 13,952,050 Eno 33,319 Contributions to Little River 95,050 Outside Agencies 1+ New Ho e 1Ug�300 Orange Rural 92,250 Miscellaneous Orange Grove 53,000 Transfers to Other Funds 1,650,975 g 138,853 Debt Service 741,125 South Orange 38,500 Southern Triangle 36,671,957 Damascus 11,500 Total General Fund 60,000 White Cross County Capital Reserve Fund: Total Fire Districts 725,551 Transfer to County Annex Data Processing Enterprise Fund Project 134,250 67,000 Transfer to Central/South General Administration Human Services Project 40,©00 Emergency Services - In-Flight Transfer to Rural Education Center Project 38,000 351,019 Transfer to Remapping Project 147,000 Public Safety Transfer to Airport Project 53,788 ui ment Replacement Fund: Transfer to Sewer Bottleneck E q p p Project 66,000 101000 Transfer to Jail Project 300,000 Human Services 247,800 Computer Lease/Purchase 50,000 Public Safety s 224,000 Undesignated CIP Public Work 200,362 Projects Total Equipment Replacement Fund 481,800 Total Capital Reserve Fund 1,029,400 t SECTION III. REVENUES: It is estimated that the following Fund Revenues will be available during the fiscal year beginning July It 1988 and ending June 30, 1989 to meet the foregoing Appropriations. General Fund: Data Processing Enterprise Fund: 67,000 Taxes 29,457,307 Charges for Services Licenses & Permits 313,000 4,699,602• Emergency Services - In-Flight Fund 351,019 Intergovernmental Charges for Services 11257,657 Charges for Services Interest on Investments 300,000 Miscellaneous 162,591' Fund Balance Appropriated 481,800 Equipment Replacement Fund: 481,800 Transfer from General Fund Total General Fund 36,671,957 County Capital Reserve Fund: Transfer from General 11029,400 Fund Revaluation Fund: Transfer from General 17,000 Fund Fire Districts: gg 000 Cedar Grove + 600 Chapel Hill Efland 56,804 Eno 97,675 Little River 30,420 86,720 New Hope 82,250 Orange Rural 53,000 Orange Grove 138,853 South Orange 38,500 Southern Triangle 11,500 Damascus 60,000 White Cross Fund Balance Appropriated 20,229 Total Fire Districts 725,551 SECTION IV. TAX RATE LEVY: There is hereby levied for the fiscal year 1988-89 a general county-wide tax rate of 64.5 cents per $100 of assesbed valuation. This rate shall be levied in the General Fund. Special district tax rates are levied as follows: Cedar Grove 5.9 cents South Orange 8.0 cents Efland 3.0 cents Chapel Hill 3.1 cents Eno 6.2 cents 'Southern Triangle 5.0 cents Little River 4.4 cents Damascus 5.6 cents New Hope 5.2 cents White Cross 7.6 cents Orange Rural 3.3 cents Chapel Hill-Carrboro School Orange Grove 4.0 .cents District 17.75 cents SECTION V. SCHOOL CURRENT EXPENSE: There is hereby allocated a lump sum of $5,279,820 for Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools and $4,942,337 for Orange County Schools, for the purpose of supporting current expense. SECTION VI. SCHOOL CAPITAL OUTLAY: There is hereby allocated $570,000 for Chapel Hill-Carrboro Schools for recurring capital and $1,035,383 for long range capital projects. There is hereby allocated $750,000 for Orange County Schools for recurring capital and $663,253 for long range capital projects. A Reserve for Future Capital Projects has been established in the amount of $711,257. This amount will be held in reserve for future school capital projects as identified in the Capital Improvement Plan. SECTION VII. DOG LICENSE: A license costing $7.50 is required for all unsterilized dogs; $5.00 for all sterilized dogs; $3.00 for all unsterilized cats and $2.00 for all sterilized cats. SECTION VIII. SCHEDULE B LICENSE: In accordance with Schedule B of the Revenue Act (Article 2, Chapter 105 of the NC State Statutes) and any other section of the General Statutes so permitting, there are hereby levied privilege license taxes in the maximum amount permitted on businesses, trades, occupations or professions which the County is entitled to tax. SECTION IX. BUDGET CONTROL: General Statutes of the State of North Carolina provide for budgetary control measures to exist between a County and Public School System. The Board of Commissioners hereby directs the following measures for budget administration and review: Per General Statute 115-429(c) , the Board of Education shall supply a copy of its final budget (once adopted) including the Uniform State Budget Format, annual audit, monthly financial reports, copies of all budget amendments to the Board of Commissioners as to the disbursement and use of local monies granted to the Board of Education by the Board of Commissioners. SECTION X. ENCUMBRANCES: Operating funds encumbered by the County as of June 30, 1988 are hereby reappropriated to this budget. This Budget being duly adopted this day of 1 !.[iJ Pte. , 1988. Beverly AVM- he, Clerk Shirley Marshall, Chair Orange County Board of Commissioners Orange County Board of Commissioners C-- Moses arey, Jr., Vice-C a'r ti Don Willhoit e&nH6a i Jo n Hartwell t t ..._..... . BUDGET ORDINANCE 1988-89 ORANGE COUNTY-, NORTH CAROLINA _ BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina. SECTION I. BUDGET ADOPTION 1988-89 There is hereby adopted the following Operating Budget for the County of Orange for this fiscal year beginning July 1, 1988 and ending June 30, 1989, the same being adopted by fund and activity, within each fund, according to the following eummary. ESTIMATED INTERFUND FUND BALANCE FUND REVENUE TRANSFER APPROPRIATED APPROPRIATION General •36,190,157 - 0 481,800 361671,957 County Capital 1,029,400 Reserve 11029,400 0 Equipment Replacement 0 481,800 Reserve 4811800 ' Revaluation 17,000 0 17,000 Fire Districts: 39,000 Cedar Grove 39,000 600 Chapel Hill 600 65j804 Efland 56,804 9,000 97,675 Eno 97,675 33,319 Little River . 30,420 21899 New Hope 86,720 8,330 92,250 Orange Rural 92,250 53,000 Orange Grove 53,000 1381853 South Orange 1381853 38;500 Southern Triangle 38,500 11,500 . Damascus 11,500 60,000 White Cross 60,000 Data Processing 67,000 Enterprise 67,000 Emergency Services - In-Flight 351,019 351,019 ' Section II. `APPROPRIATION: That for said fiscal year there is hereby appropriated out of the funds the following: AppROPRIATiON APPROPRIATION FUNCTION FUNCTION Revaluation Fund: General Fund: 17,000 Community Maintenance 519,667 Reserve for Revaluation 1 857,414 General Administration 1,857,758 Fire Districts: Taxation and Records 1971,321 39,000 Community Planning 7,806,541 Cedar Grove 600 Human Services 71806,540 Chapel Hill 65,604 Public Safety 11948r813 Efland 97,675 Public Works 13,952,050 Eno 33,319 Education Little River 95,050 Contributions to 1,649,726 New Hope 92,250 Outside Agencies 109,300 Orange Rural 53,000 Miscellaneous Orange Grove 138,853 7411 Transfers to Other Funds 1,fi5 , 5 South Orange 38,500 Debt Service , 11225 Southern Triangle 11,500 36 671,957 Damascus 60,000 Total General Fund + White Cross 725— County Capital Reserve Fund: ! Total Fire Districts ,55I Transfer to County Annex Data Processing Enterprise Fund Project 134,250 67,000 General Administration Transfer to Central/South 40rOfl0 Human Services Project Emergency Services - In-Flight Transfer to Rural Education 040 8, Center Project 3 public Safety 351,019 Transfer to Remapping Project 147,000 Transfer to Airport Project 53x788 Equipment Replacement Fund: Transfer to Sewer Bottleneck 66,000 Project 10,000 31v,aa0 Human Services 2471800 Transfer to Jail Project 00 000 public Safety Computer Lease/Purchase 1 public Works 224,000 Undesignated CIP 200,362 481.800 Projects Total Equipment Replacement Fund Total Capital Reserve Fund 1,029,400 It is estimated that the following Fund Revenues will be available SECTION III. REVENUES: during the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1988 and ending June 30, 1989 to meet the foregoing Appropriations. Data Processing enterprise Fund: 67,000 General Fund: Taxes 29,457 ,307• Charges for Services Licenses & Permits 313,000 Intergovernmental 4,6991602 Emergency Services - In-Flight Fund: 351,019 Charges for Services 11257,657 Charges for Services Interest on Investments 300,000 Miscellaneous 162,591 Fund Balance Appropriated 481,800 Equipment Replacement Fund: 481,800 Transfer from General Fund Total General Fund 36,671,957 County Capital Reserve Fund: Transfer from General 1,029,400 Fund Revaluation Fund: Transfer from General 17 ,000 Fund i Fire Districts: 39 000 Cedar Grove r.600 Chapel Hill Efland 56,804:• Eno 97,675 Little River 30,420 New Hope 86,720 Orange Rural 92,250 Orange Grove 53,000 South Orange 138,853 Southern Triangle 38,500 Damascus 11,500 White Cross 601000 Fund Balance Appropriated 20,229 Total Fire Districts 725,551 is hereby levied for the fiscal year 1988-89 a general There SECTION IV. TAX RATE LEVY: 104 of as valuation. This rate shall be levied in the county-wide tax rate of 64.5 cents per $ General Fund. Special district tax rates are levied as follows: 8.4 cents 5.9 cents South Orange 3.1 cents Cedar Grove 3,0 cents Chapel Hill 5.0 cents Southern Triangle 5.6 cents Efland 6.2 cents Eno 4 Damascus 7 .6 cents .4 cents Little River 5,2 cents white Crass New Hope 3.3 cents Chapel Hill-Carrboro School 17 .75 cents 4.4 cents Orange Rural District Orange Grove : There is hereby allocated a lump sum of $5r 279,824 for SECTION V. SCHOOL CURRENT EXPENSE and $4,942,337 for Orange County Schools, for the purpose of Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools supporting current expense. LAY: There is hereby allocated $570,004 for Chapel hereb arrboro SECTION VI. SCHOOL CAPITAL OUT ran a capital projects. There is hereby 035,383 for long 9 range Schools for recurring capital and $l, ca ital and $663,253 for long allocated $750,000 for Orange County Schools for recurring cap capital projects as identified in capital projects. A Resew e for .Future Capital Projects has been established in the amount o $711,257. This amount will Plane held in reserve for future sc d dogs; $5.40 the Capital improvement SECTION VII. DOG LICENSE: A license costing $7 .50 is required for all unsterilize s 3.00 for all unsterilized cats and $2.04 for all sterilized cats Article 2r for all sterilized dogs; $ permitting, REDUCE B LICENSE: In accordance witonSofe�heeGeneral the StatutesRevenue so P saes SECTION VIII- SC and an other sects permitted on businesses, Chapter 105 of the NC State Statutes) Y there are hereby levied privilege licechethetaxes Countytis entitledatoutax trades, occupations or professions which Provide for stem. The Board of SECTION IX. BUDGET CONTROL: General Statutes untof andePublic SchooltSyCarolina eview: measures for budget administration an budgetary control measures to exist between a County Commissioners hereby directs the following of its final budget the Board of Education shall supply a copy financial reports, Per General Statute 115-429(c) r ed including the Uniform state Budget Format, annual audit, month y (once adopted) copies of all budget amendments to the Board of Commissioners as to the disbursement and use of local monies granted to the Board of Education by the Board of Commissioners. SECTION X. ENCUMBRANCES: Operating funds encumbered by the County as of June 30, 1988 are hereby reappropriated to this budget. This Budget being duly adopted this .�aG �.w day of _� Glf1 �.. 1988. Beverly A. ly he, lerk Shirley Marshall, Chair Orange County Board of Commissioners Orange County Board of Commissioners Moses arey, Jr. , Vice-C air Don Willhoit ep en Halkivtis Jo n LHartwell OS.4.441 POINTS OF CLARIFICATION to REPORT CONCERNING IMPLICATION OF PROPOSED BUDGET FY 88/89 The following points are offered as clarification to the report given the Orange County Recreation and Parks Advisory Council by Mary Anne Black, Director of that department, on June 7, 1988. Within each budget year, there are instances which result in the non-spending of budgeted funds. For instance, many recreation programs are offered which do not "make" (minimum program participation levels are not met) and are then not facilitated, resulting in a budgetary savings. Another example (which occurred this past year) is the instance when a full-time staff position, responsible for the planning, scheduling, and implementation of programs, is vacant for any length of time. This position vacancy results in budgetary 1 savings in that those programs normally scheduled are not facilitated. Throughout the budgetary process, the Manager, Budget Team, and department head must keep this fact in mind as they project what level of resources are needed for any department to offer its program of service in the up-coming year. There is no indication that our program of service will change next year (FY 88/89), or that any programs will have to be replaced or cut. My report (see attached) , outlines which programs I would recommend to the Manager be cut f that action was ever warranted or became necessary because instances resulting in budgetary savings did not occur throughout the year. The Council' s Chairman and Vice-chair requested the attached information with questions concerning "what if" all programs • make, no games are rained out and no staff positions become. vacant. That. is not made clear in the attached report. (Language indicates cuts "will" be made, rather than cuts "would" be made if certain instances arise. ) We project that the new programs and commitments outlined will be included in our program of service next year, as well as the continuation of our on-going commitments. It is important that each Council member understand these • points of clarification. If questions should arise, do not hesitate to contact me or the County Manager. He and I stand ready to assist you and to ensure that the Orange County • Recreation and Parks Department will continue to provide an adequate program of service to the citizens of Orange County. ORANGE COUNTY RECREATION AND PARKS IMPLICATIONS OF PROPOSED BUDGET CUTS -- FY 88/89 Presentation to Recreation and Parks Advisory Council June 7, 1988 Mary Anne Black, Director In response to your request, the following comments are offered concerning the implications of the proposed budget cuts for the up-coming fiscal year (FY 88/89) . In FY 87/88, Orange County made several commitments to programs and facilities via action by the Board of County Commissioners. . to brief, incomplete listing is attached. ) The Orange County Recreation and Parks Department has carried out these directives in a professional manner, adhering to county policy, and assuring safe program and park opportunities throughout FY 87/88. With the proposed budget level as recommended in the operating accounts, adjustments to program delivery must occur. These decisions are not easy to make and must be made with consistent logic without compromise to professional judgement. This department prides itself on being a leader in our community, the state, and most recently, the nation. Staff commitment to the task at hand is unparalleled, with staff giving far above and beyond reasonable levels of expectation. With new obligations/commitments accepted, yet cuts in budget proposed, the following cuts will be initiated, effective July 1, 1988. Clear needs have been identified for all these programs, but adjustments must be made in order to honor our commitments to the outlined programs/facilities listed above. Cuts will include: 1. September Road Race $ 1, 365 125 participants ' Cooperative program with Chapel Hill R & P 2. Men's Adult Basketball League . . $ 2,255 • ISO participants 3. Adult Oil Painting Classes $ 2, 160 100 participants (4 classes per year) 4. Community Youth Theater Subsidy $ 1,000 Funded by several organizations Orange County has funded at this level for a number of years. 5. Adult Man's Softball $ 2,750 10 teams -- 185 participants - —y- 6. Youth Baseball Officials Subsidy 3,640 Hillsborough Youth Athletic Association Cedar Grove Youth Baseball League both sponsor a rapidly growing youth baseball program serving hundreds of children. They are volunteer organizations providing this service. Our subsidy off-sets umpire pay for their games. TOTAL $. 139170 The decision to not offer theSe programs next year also impacts our personnel funding and revenue projections in the following manner: Temporary Personnel cost can be reduced approximately $2960 Revenue Projections can be reduced approximately $7450 The decision to not offer the above-outlined programs next 1 year or next season, depending on the type program, is based on two underlying premises: (1) that above all other target populations, children and senior citizens will continue to be top priority, with . focus on intergenerational programs to attempt to program with a family focus, touching as many generations as possible • with our programs, and (2) that our first obligation in program delivery is to serve those residents who may not be able to receive the service from another organization or agency or who do not have the discretionary income or transportation means to take advantage of similar services elsewhere. % . This department re-confirms its commitment to excellence each day by striving to ensure that each and every program that it is able to offer or park/recreation center site that it is responsible for having open to the public is a safe and accessible one, providing wholesome and constructive leisure opportunities. No matter what our funding level is each year, we will continue to operate with nothing short of sound professional judgement and commitment. Funding levels, however, affect our ability to adequately meet the level of needs/demands identified and with the addition of new commitments without new resources, delivery of existing programs must be adjusted. . . 11. FY 87/88 NEW PROGRAM COMMITMENTS / OBLIGATIONS FAIRVIEW PARK -- annual operations $5000 SENIOR CITIZENS NUTRITION SITE ARTS/CRAFTS $7350 BOCC action 3 days/week at 5 sites PERSONAL MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT • $2000 Staff utilizes own cars to make site/program visits. REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE of BUILDINGS/GROUNDS $1700 Fairview Park Homestead Building These funds not budgeted in Public Works accounts HEALTH YOURSELF EMPLOYEE WELLNESS $1440 TOTAL $ 17,490 • - • MEMO TO: Board of Commissioners FROM: John Link, County Manager SUBJECT: Alternatives for School Funding DATE: June 17, 1988 Based on individual Commissioner comments made during the course of this week's budget discussions, you have shared concerns about the following: 1) Finding ai budget alternative which would reduce the Chapel Hill/Carrboro School district tax. 2) Meeting the needs of the Orange County system. 3) Narrowing the gap in percentage increases for the two school systems. 4) Keeping tax rate increases down for all citizens of Orange County, given the upcoming bond issue. With these concerns in mind, we have formulated the following draft alternative for funding education in FT 1988-89 . 1) Increase the per student allocation from $950 to $967 This would provide an additional $87,000 to Orange County and an additional $93,000 in County funds to Chapel Hill/Carrboro. 2) Increase the appropriation from fund balance in the Chapel Hill/Carrboro system from $515,000 to $644,000. This would leave an estimated undesignated fund balance of $511,000, or 4.5% of the current expense fund. (Per present Commissioner Policy, maximum undesignated Fund balance is 5.5%) 3) Decrease the district tax from 18.75 cents ( a 2.25 cent increase) to 17.75 cents (a 1.25 cent increase) . This decrease in the recommended tax rate could be accomplished without reducing the original recommended funding level available to Chapel Hill/Carrboro schools because of the additional $93,000 from County funds and the additional $129,000 - appropriation from fund balance. The above scenario would cost the County's General Fund $179,707. This is equivalent to .54 cents on the County's property tax rate. We do have an'option available which would eliminate the need to raise County-wide taxes by .54 cents. This option is defined below. 1) Reduce the recurring capital appropriation to the Chapel Hill/Carrboro school system by transferring the $180,000 appropriation for construction of temporary classrooms from the recurring capital fund to the School Capital Reserve fund. This would require an exception to the Commissioner's policy that each school system will receive $750,000 each year in recurring capital appropriations. 2) Increase the appropriation from County sales tax funds to Chapel Hill/Carrboro schools by $180,000, thereby insuring that the school system receives the same total amount for recurring and major capital expenses. (The temporary classrooms could be defined as a capital project) 3) Decrease the amount reserved for future capital projects or associated debt service by $180,000. This would bring the total of this reserve from $890,964 to 710,964. In summary, I wanted to bring to your attention that there is an alternative' whereby we can increase the funds appropriated to Orange County System, reduce the Chapel Hill/Carrboro district tax increase and reduce the discrepancy in the percentage increase in local funds allocated to the two school systems. Furthermore, it is possible to accomplish the above without increasing the County-wide tax rate above the recommended 3.9 cents. I will be happy to discuss this or any other options for funding our schools with you at any time. P.S. Because both Dan Lunsford and Gerry House were out of the office on Friday, I have not yet been able to discuss these alternatives with them. Also. I have enclosed a chart reflecting the original request, Manager's original recommendation axed this alternative. ....__ _.................... . rr Pq 68JtLJ9 MM as-edxayos :aweualkd Lh1b55S 81h'6815 AINfI03 861'£7ZS aousleq punj wo,i; uo};e4ddojdde l,ppV 01108HHV1 061'99S Xl ue43 ssal sasea,toui drQlaS 39NVHO 15O'1m XL uegl 6901 SaSeaJou} AJelaS 1llIH 13dVH3 886'22LS pa;oadxa Aauow *pa Ieuop000A 096'6£L$ :a;a;S wool pa;oadxo dauow 'pa leuat;aooA :SNOIIJWflSSV {SIN33 NI) X9'1 SC LL %9"£L 51'84 X51£ 1'LZ 5'9L aIVH xai DIH1SIO NOTIV3011V XS ZL L4t'L 5£1'L X1'02 9£8'L L25'L lIdfld Had X2'£L Sh0'Lh£'6 To Sty/ 521'al'I'6 X9'12 £62'920'OL 91£'842'a 1V1018nS XV1 13IH1SI4 XL'SL SZZ'L90'h 9'LZ 521'£82'h X6'6£ £1S'1£6,9 061/'6ZS'£ OH08HHV3/1111i 13JVH3 1SONnd AM=) OH08HHV3 %6'LL OZa'61Z'S 6'6 000'18L'S X8'1 OZ1'880'S 98e'au,' r MIN ladv"3 NOI1V3011Y XL'LL 196 Z'6 056 X6'94 1L0'L 010 1Idtid Had (SOMA A1NA03) X6'OL 1££'2761F, .0'6 OSh'S58'h %1'9L YLZ'00Z'S 1'1L'954'h AIN003 39NVH0 88-18 88-18 68-88 88-18 68-89 88-10 wool 3AIIVNH311V woul SON3NNO33H NOHi IS3t103H 130008 3SV3H3NI X MN 3SV3H3NI X H39VNVH 3SV3V3NI X t z 130OM MUM MUM N31SAS IOOH3S BATIVNH311V /2.02/irg qi!!) The Inter-Faith Council for Social Service Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514 • 207 Wilson Street (919) 929-6380 June 16. 1788 Ms. Shirley Marshall, Chair Orange County Board of Commissioners 707 E. Franklin Street Chapel Hill ,' NC 27514 Dear Ms. Marshall: The Inter-Faith Council is .arateful to the Orange County Board of Commissioners for including the IFC Shelter in its 1788-19E19 budget. As you know, the IFC has formed a partnership with the Town of Chapel Hill for purposes of renovating the Old Municipal Building into a human service facility primarily a community shelter and kitchen for • the homeless and hungry of our county. Chapel Hill has thus far pledged .$200,000 for the renovation of the OMB and the town is also be furnish- ing all utilities, building maintenance and continued landscaping of the outside grounds. Previous to this commitment, Chapel Hill , through its Human Services Advisory Board, provided the IFC $15,000 to operate our existing shelter income for three years. The Town of Carrboro has also provided funding, $5,000 annually for the last three years and $6,500 for fiscal year 1988-89... In addition, the Housing and Community Development Depart- ments for Chapel hill , Carrboro and Orange County have been working cooperatively with the IFC to obtain Homeless Assistance funds from the NC Department of Human Resources for the last two years. It is our belief that this recent support, plus the support of many congregations and concerned citizens indicates that the shelter for the homeless is now an effort which is owned not just by IFC, but by joint public and private interests. The cooperation of many county and private agencies has also insured that the many clients who are without • a home or a meal can be referred to the IFC for shelter---a resource which now can provide sleeping accomodations to 42 men, women and children. It is the purpose of this letter to encourage our Commissioners to allocate more than $5,000 to the shelter operation in your next fiscal budget. We strongly feel that $15,000 would be an amount that would more adequately represent the county's commitment to this project, as well as meeting the operating costs necessary for IFC to effectively manage a safe and comfortable shelter for the county's homeless. IFC hopes that your financial support for these necessary services can be significantly increased. We will be meeting with you on June 22 to further describe the needs of Orange County's homeless population and to answer your questions. In the meantime, if you or any Commissioner have a concern, do not hesitate to contact me. (6.1i7rely OP United Fund Agency " Rev. -ichard Eden , F' esident 4 IFC SHELTER STATISTICS: JANUARY-1 1.88 throu: JUNE 14 1'88 1988 (5z months) 102 (12 months) Guests: 142 178 Units of Service: 3,749 44687 PROBLEM: Alcoholism 34 New Job NCMH Treatment 4 Transient 23 New Arrival Seeking Work 10 Mentally ill 22 Evicted - 12 Family Problems >9 Released Prisoner 8 Mentally Retarded 1 Probation (intensive) 2 Economically depressed 13 REFERRING AGENCY: IFC 105 _.._ . Police Social Workers- Chapel Hill 18 Carrboro Police 2 Dept. Social Services 3 Congregation 2 OPC Mental Health 1 Probation Officer 2 Employer 1 Business 1 NCMH 1 Friend 1 Pregnancy Support Ser. 1 Halfway House 1 Carrboro Business 1 Durham Shelter 1 Alcohol Recovery Ctr. 1 ORIGIN: Carrboro 4 6 Chapel Hill 55 62 g Oran e County 8 14 'y North Carolina (other 50 61 than Orange Co. ) Out of State 25 33 Out of Country SEX/RACE: Males -- black 55 Males -- white 63 Females -- black 8 Females - white 14 Female - oriental 1 ' Male - hispanic 1 These figures include 5 children. . . . . • - I - , • - . 111 • . 1 OM NM - IMO MN I '11111:ZIAN' 111 • . 111111111111111 fl KITCHEN romml 8 BEDS mow STORAGE --, %). • . - ) B BEDS 11 . \... ' . --- .. I. -...----- ........... . ; ' % .......... I I Li mow CONTROL 8 BEDS 1J , . X . 1 . ,.... • 8'BEDS , ELEV. \> , .... .. „ MECH. 2 BEDS J. JAN ,ii . • STOR- 1 0 0 0 0 7 EXIT ..... ..... 0 M . TOILETS CONTROL LOUNGE BEDROOM ,a -ATHER- -• f."-.) • di -IZATION j-Th., - I • GROUND FLOOR . . NEN'S SI-ET ER I 1 _ 4111=111111■1111M11■1111 . . • .... ■, l• . • • i• * 1 • • • . . •' ' • 1 111111111p • 411 11111 ._4 . . . 1. 'Jr... _L------•---. •- • • - r-•-•--•=7J - 1 • . 1 ii r'.. . • .. 1 i . . . i -, • , • : .......l KITCHEN - i , . . . i . . I 'I • 1 . 'CI . i'. . . 1 . tr ! . . • 5 r I ' • I DINING I ENTRY / 72 SEATS , , • . . , C tit . , WOMEN V. • RE PT - N. • - . 1 , n • 0 , 11 * . </- I :1 ,.._., , , i 11 0 COUNSELOR, ...m.,- • • 1 da :04. i . . MEN ---- / * i -., 1 1 ilt SMOKING ,...! , -ii• . -. ., , J • RECREATION & TV LOUNGE ENTRY . -- - - - ;-•-• 1 - -ut. • ' -- 1 . . • FIRST FLOOR i , • . . . K . • g , • II1H11 DU • • insinii . 3 111111111 LOUNGE / • . • CONTROL BEDROOM*1- •BEDROOM* I CONTROL BEDROOM • 213EDS.. 2.BEDS 1 . . . BEDR150M*4 ‘--- JAN. - . 11 I/I .2 EEDS T 114 . 1-:.. • :-....) STOR. - 111 BATH BEDROOM#3 111111111111 .? 161 2.EMS . . _.... - . • . DUNDRY mg, mem, 0 .. ...---... I . 1 I ... EXIT 1 I if CLOTHES FAMILY BEDROOM (#5) 11 . IL STORAGE V. ow; . mum • • INN NB MIII NO 1 • INCIIIM .< 1 ' NUM OFFICE COMP. = MIME - 01 Analimuscog MEETING ROOM - - i . • Inlig r...,. 1 • I i ; - Ili , ." Zs- . OFFICE WORK ROOM OFFICE 11 „ . _ ...... ----,------, SECOND FLOOR WO/ N'S SI-ELIER • • 1 GRAN COUNTY POPULATION �/7 I - 17-Year Prele/Non - c 190000 ' - 180000 - . 170000 - ' 1 90000 - 140000 - 130000 - I.e..- L 120000 - . e . • - )' 110000 - ' 100000 - • 90006 - F 80000 - 70000 - 80000 - 8D000 — 40000 1 1 1 1 1 1970 . . 1980 1990 2000 • Population Q . Il • 0 Persona Anfmals . . alma COUNTY ANNALS tOanbers Sheltered • 19000 • , 18000 - • 17000 - 18000 - 18000 - - 14000 - 13000 - *•▪ • 12000 >` 11000 - • 10000 - 9000 - y . 8000 - -_- 7000 - . c " 8000 ,�J,/�....' .'.. 4000 !3- 1 1 1 1 1 1970 1980 1990 2000 Population 0 Persons x 721 Antmd9 0 Persons x 108 • ORANGE CTY APS • Admissions, 1980-1988 - 7 6 t1;1111 wig ii . 0o 4 0 3 iss• 2 41AI • 0 h. ilk 1116 Ilk& kith ilk, 16, hi,. 1880 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1988 1987 1988 yaws nj TOTAL ACMISSIONS • II • +.11■110•1•0111!1■11, June 21, 1988 ED Preschool Consulting Program Update I. Children Served 62 Children referred 21 Seen o Pending II. Center Contacts A. Center Visits *1. Victory Village *2. Community School for People Under Six *3. Mother's Care *4. Chapel Hill Cooperative Preschool *5. Bi-City Center **6. Brooks Day Care Center **7• Children's Learning Center *8. University Presbyterian Preschool & Kindergarten **9. Cedar Grove Day Care **10. Tiny Tots Day Care *11. Carrboro Methodist * To see referred children ** Northern Orange B. Other Contacts (Telephone or Training) • • 1. FPG 2. University Presbyterian - Training • 3. Kiddie Quarters - Training 4. Holmes - Training 5. Transitional Preschool - Training 6. Chapel Hill Day Care 7. Sycamore Preschool 8. Family Preschool - Training 9. Aldersgate Methodist - Training 10. University Baptist - Training 11. Playschool Nursery - Training III. Services Provided to Centers A. Teacher Consultation 1. Program Suggestions (Classroom Management) 2. Environment Evaluation 3. Training B. Child Screening • 1. Observation 2. Parent Conferences • 3. Other Agency Referrals -- 1 IV. Agency Contacts A. DSS B. School Systems 1. Chapel Hill-Carrboro Schools - Negotiating contract for 99-457 services for 1988-89, 1989-90 school years 2. Orange County Schools - Information exchange for contracting for 99-457 services C. Durham DEC Possibilities for providing evaluations • D. Dr. Joanne Dalldorf - Consultation and possibilities for evaluations E. DSS F. Child Care Networks G. PACT Coordination and Consultation H. Orange County Day Care Coalition 1. Introduction of services and referral process 2. WTVD Focus at noon for Week of the Young Child V. Services to Parents A. Conferences - 6 B. Telephone Consultation - 12 C. Initial Contacts - 18 1 31ct MP.M lb,(-roll $lu, & to aQ GeitoJr4ge CUAJIJty tke*1'tP+L I4EP Ill A rAUArtt2i4 33.5 sTteawr P L 14"-L,t.Vc. ter '(bJ is taAu rtc.,. t.irs.1ti( •1 APMC tAi1 'T't'6E waste m4c a l►JbP► 41c.• '4b e, z -v-P ttibt4 `i'g.a car-r► , CCoQab t rJ Ncta. }li►a Cxt∎1e i t•■Z 11,1 e1.) -t FCTIIIkr 141 'pgESC 41 1. 2. A1■b 11* f.Ecraw:.t.*.Fra'tatiNVa t Pe to M' '°•Beall.. bcTVAr,fi.W t°tt2-. . At . t..11J`OA tit c-t, I 4 zot.o t r Zr...AttoSt, AN.b N.►--r LsbrrAi StStANS -- -"Dtsc,c. 1.4R. C►- e. q Pr-na1~aS crtAM Nr LAMI . c aa. t4 t. Py`1"tot. r'rse— ScAttm. r, sNu4 r►ir e„. At►a"Q l bCr- FAc.s... . PA I fl btcA 't, "tom ttc@.. t CT' tS * t'te. 0,44) '1p "7E `Id. . CHtc,� C acv►�1EC.�1 AtSt> T4 ` '.a'StR •EA.TC" - 4E SCIot`41..11Jrc w rnt 0•Q t..V Ltw►.„t1-EZt) ESP 6el>Gtik t %FC-s~:'L r-ba`t‘-‘14 P'M' -te 1 .vim -cl Pazte31 cac-` tw si1str•VAIL.,. pieSb Wt-�aw‘'Z =1 at,.Q As 4.,11a1:A taut- - r).>~ t4..1 't Zc-t tot,S '1144 k. Yot- t,11�tib A''S seasi tc.E Av Ni t,A6 • • tr • z Chapel a IqS3 Deck 0-b 1‘-ii‘dt(3s1one.rs Lodi_icrn .c.\ n re_c rd s 4-11`e- ntLki CAruld Q C_OrYSL)il-cd-ton s e vvi ce Or&re_ Cot 1LLs proc-oro nn I S `-'1i ck- -CrYr bur cicii_k Cente.r • G.6 weik c.c.S o1/41-4k, r Qe...n-tcrs CL cit recrt-cr Q Care_ 0_enle Seem Ovtit 1:Cc rS A number c>.0 4roobled • ciAdditri uJI-10 ve- -44:1edt. In re c e_t (3c Nice., C.4 nd inctve. Cit row n up c become. 4mob1rci Adt3S . V-tcisco Coorcit rick.461" hoz Prover) 40 be- ve_acut e n her wordC. -Itztaers hext hc1ve. eta Ind Vet i Akle. r\ScEtz- nci t rvfor rna...4-ton e,nck.ble_ WLQ m Se.live_ 444.t. Cifidt-€A) m Our ce..nie r . t-let.art god 'fur PC-OVICIII1% `I-4/LS 5er‘Ace_ Ora rle. aeliaxt inceitki (?OvrA ebilfite° RENOVATION PROJECTS • BUILDINGS & GROUNDS Roof Repair Revere Road 50,000 Foyer & Exterior Doors Court Street Annex 3,000 Concrete Truck Wash Area Public Works 6,000 Air Conditioners Northern Human Sery 5,000 Walks, Landscaping Old Courthouse 5,000 P.A. System Courthouses 8,00D Nini Blinds Southern Human Sery 2,000 Court Street Annex 5,000 Driveway Public Works 30,000 Handicap Accessibility Northern Human Sery ,^ Amy and Homestead Gtr 11,000 Partitions Planning 3,000 , r . • TOTAL RENOVATIONS 128,000 • 16t-- 1 . , • • --• . . ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agenda Item No. ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: June 29, 1988 SUBJECT: Budget Amendments DEPARTMENT: Finance PUBLIC HEARING YES: NO: X ATTACHMENT(S) : Proposed Budget INFORMATION CONTACT:Finance Office Amendments TELEPHONE NUMBER- . Hillsborough - 732-8181 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 • Mebane - 227-2031 Durham - 688-7331 . . - - PURPOSE: To consider the following budget amendments ' - - . - - . . . . . . . ..-- . . . . . . • . . . • • - - ' , - . • . . . . . . _ . . . . . _ - ' • • • , - - - . BACKGROUND: 1. -,The7Orange County-Health-Department.:has been awarded -.... :.....!.:.:7 . „. ._ , . — additional funds2- frow.the Division of Health Services:. The total of all the monies is_S4,314::.They will be used . - i . for operating expenditures and,capital purchases.; No_ :- .:. .....:... County funds are involved.----.-::—.-:- -.-:=--•.---:-.7.7:-... 2. The Orange County Health Department- has been notified of. - • • another acrosa-the-board. budget reduction in the Family ' - Planning program. The amount of the reduction is $2,059. . . . • . . . . . : . • ' . .., .- . . . ... . _ . , . . • . . . . , • :.. - • • • • - • . .: . . RECOMMENDATION(S) : Approve motion to amend, the 1987-8B Budget Ordinance by . ...-• - . the proposed amendments. : -.-_- . 7. ': :-. - , . • - . . . . _ - .. .. , ' • . - . . _ . . . . . . • • . . . . . . . . ..- % .-...., ....... . . . ., . .. . :. . . . _ _ . - . - . . . •- . - . . . . . • • • „ . , , . . • • • • • • - . . . .. . .. . . . • - . . - • . . . • . • • - . 1 ORANGE COUNTY PROPOSED 1987-88 BUDGET AMENDMENTS The 1987-88 Budget Ordinance as adopted on August 4, 1987, and subsequently amended, is hereby amended as follows: BEFORE AFTER AMENDMENT ,AMENDMENT AMENDMENT: 1. GENERAL FUND Appropriation: Health $1,939,353.25 $ 4,314 $1,943,667.25 Source: Intergovernmental - Health 322,672.25 4,314 326,986.25 2. GENERAL FUND Appropriation: Health 1,943, 667.25 - 2,059 1,941,608.25 Source: Intergovernmental - Health 326,986.25 - 2,059 324,927 .25 • • /S/ride/ I/70e - CO. CAPITAL PROJECTS - S9M BOND(REVISED) E9 90 91 92 93 94 TOTAL PREVIOUS TOTAL BOND ISSUE PROJECTS: SOUTHERN HUMAN / SERVICES BLDG 600 1,550 850 3,000 �` 3,183 TAX & RECORDS �+"'�^' BONG 131 1,369 .. 2,880 ANIMAL SHELTER 300 300// 431 WATER RESOURCE 1 1,000 . DEVELOPMENT/ 1,000 Z,000 Y POOLS 3,000 .+N 60O 3,260 911 CENTER 200 300 282 TOTAL 731 2,919 5,350 0 0 0 9,000 , 11,036 PAY-AS-YOU-GO PROJECTS: PLANNING & AG LEASE 56 56 56 PUBLIC WORKS . / FACILITY 100 320 342 338 ' 1,100 ✓ 1,323 COMPUTER LEASE %,- 50. .:..50 50 50 ., . 200 .. 200. .. 911/CAD LEASE 100 100 100 300 . 300 REMAPPING 150 100 100 350 350 6 do, /' CENTRAL HUMAN SERV. 536 50 ,.`815 1,279 RURAL ED CENTER 20 20 50 75 175 340 340 RECREATION 50 25 60 100 180 415 632 Efland Comm. Center 100 150 250 RESERVE 50 50 ti 50 50 200 400 493 . TOTAL 0 1,012 615 752 813 805 3,997 4,973 FILENAME:6NDPRJ22 . r s - _ CAPITAL PROJECTS - $30M BOND PROJECT TOTAL COST SCHOOLS 21,000,000 PUBLIC BUILDINGS: a) Southern Human Services 3,000,000 b) Tax & Records 1,500,000 c) Animal Shelter 300,000 d) 911 Center 200,000 RECREATION a) Pools 3,000,000 WATER FACILITIES a) Water Resource Development/ Land Acquisition 1,000,000 TOTAL 30,000,000 • r SCHOOL CAPITAL FUNDING SCENARIO # I . ■ X21 million bond issue ■ X12. 5 million available for pay=as—you- go projects ■ Total amount of X33.5 available for capital projects ■ Property tax increase of 201 cent necessary ‘4, SCHOOL CAPITAL FUNDING - WITH $21M BOND ISSUE 89 90 91 92 93 TOTAL • EXPENSES: '89 Approp. 1,519 1,519 Pay-as-you-go 2,680 2,850 2,095 2,343 2,612 12,580 (unidentified) Debt Service 0 1,022 2,044 2,044 2,044 7,154 TOTAL 4,199 3,872 4,139 4,387 4,656 21,253 REVENUES: Balance - cap. fund 289 289 Sales tax 2,410 2,585 2,727 2,877 3,035 13,634 School Bldg Fund 585 480 521 557 600 2,743 Prior yr Bldg Fund 804 804 D.S. Allocation 111 107 154 176 198 746 Tax increase of 2.1 0 700 737 777 823 3,037 cents TOTAL 4,199 3,872 4,139 4,387 4,656 21,253 SUMMARY OF EXPENSES FUNDED: 21.0 million from bond issue 12.3 million from pay-as-you-go 334 million total capital projects Page 1 i SCHOOL CAPITAL FUNDING SCENARIO #2 • X18 million bond issue ■ X12.9 million, available for pay-as-you- go projects ■ Total amount of X30.9 million available for capital projects ■ Property tax increase of 1 .75 cents necessary lig SCHOOL CAPITAL FUNDING - WITH $18M BOND ISSUE 89 90 91 92 93 TOTAL EXPENSES: '89 Approp. 1,519 1,519 Pay-as-you-go 2,680 2,733 2,264 2,506 2,767 12,950. (unidentified) Debt Service 0 876 1,752 1,752 1,752 6,132 TOTAL 4,199 3,609 4,016 4,258 4,519 20,601 REVENUES: Balance - cap. fund 289 289 Sales tax 2,410 2,585 2,727 2,877 3,035 13,634 School Bldg Fund 585 480 521 557 600 2,743 Prior yr Bldg Fund 804 804 D.S. Allocation 111 107 154 176 198 746 Tax increase of 0 583 614 648 686 2,531 1.75 cents TOTAL 4,199 3,755 4,016 4,258 4,519 20,747 SUMMARY OF EXPENSES FUNDED: 18.0 million from bond issue 12.9 million from pay-as-you-go 30.9 million total capital projects Page 1 a CO CAPITAL FUNDING - $9M BOND ISSUE 89 90 91 92 93 94 TOTAL EXPENSES: 829 829 ,89 AppraP• S1 620 702 791 883 4, 177 Pay-as-YOU-90 200 (Unidentified) 0 438 876 876 876 876 3,942 Debt Service 1 029 667 _Y, 8w TOTAL , 1,419 -7,-496 1x578 ]-, REVENUES: Sales tax 1,029 1,086 11145 1,208 1,275 1,345 7,088 333 351 370 392 414 1,860 Tax increase of 1 cent ...._...------ TOTAL 11029 11419 1,496 1,578 1,667 1,759 8,948 SUMMARY OF EXPENSES FUNDED: 9 .0 million from bond issue 4.2 million from pay-as-You-go 13.2 million total capital projects Filename: COBOND2 Date revised: 06/23/88 Distribution of School Bonds The following distribution is based on: 1) School request 2) CI? Advisory Committee recommendation to include 2nd Orange Elementary School 3) Examine pools separately, deleting $800,000 from Chapel Hill/Carrboro request Chapel Hill Amount of Issue Carrboro Orange County $18 M $11 M $7 M $21 M $12.5 M $8.5 M A