Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda - 11-01-94 - VIII-C
1 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: November 1, 1994 Action Agenda Item # W -C. SUBJECT: WAGON FARM TRAILS PHASES I, II, III & IV - PRELIMINARY PLAN ACTION BY: December 10, 1994 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC HEARING Yes X No ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: Eddie Kirk Resolution of Approval Extension 2582 Application Vicinity Map Preliminary Plan TELEPHONE NUMBERS: Draft 10/17/94 Planning Board Minutes Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 967-9251 PURPOSE: Consideration of the Preliminary Plan for Wagon Farm Trails Phases I, II, III and IV. BACKGROUND: The property is located in Cheeks Township on the north side of High Rock Road (SR 1340) . The tract size is fifty-five (55) acres with thirty nine (39) lots proposed. Lot sizes are all approximately one acre in size except for one lot that is one and a half (1. 5) acres and one lot that is 4. 0 acres. The property is zoned R-1 and PW-II. It is designated Rural Residential and Protected Watershed in the Comprehensive Plan. Public roads are proposed to serve the subdivision with stubouts proposed to the north and east of the property. The entrance to the subdivision is on Poplar Drive which is a platted right-of-way that has never been constructed. All lots would receive access from the subdivision roads except possibly lot one which has minimal frontage on Poplar Drive. A 1992 traffic count on High Rock Road indicated 170 trips per day. The subdivision will be served by individual wells and septic tanks. 2 The Planning Board approved the Concept Plan for Wagon Farm Trails Phases I, II, III and IV with public roads constructed to State standards on November 15, 1993 . On October 17, 1994 the Planning Board recommended approval of the Preliminary Plan for Wagon Farm Trails Phases I, II, III & IV subject to the conditions contained in the attached Resolution of Approval. The vote was unanimous. RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan for Wagon Farm Trails Phases I, II, III & IV subject to the conditions contained in the attached Resolution of Approval. 3 6/93 - RESOLUTION OF THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Date November 1, 1994 Name of Subdivision Wagon Farm Trails Phases I, IL III, & IV Owner/Applicant Murray Lynch The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves Wagon Farm Trails Phases I, II, III & IV subdivision preliminary plat, dated August 22, 1994 and containing 39 lots in Orange County, subject to the fulfillment of requirements specified herein. Poplar Drive, Wagon Farm Road, Wagon Court and Trail Drive shall be irrevocably dedicated to the general public and be constructed to standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. The approval of this resolution authorizes and directs the Orange County manager to accept for Orange County and on behalf of the public generally, the offer of dedication of Poplar Drive, Wagon Farm Road, Wagon Court and Trail Drive. This acceptance by Orange County of the dedication to the general public of Poplar Drive, Wagon Farm Road, Wagon Court and Trail Drive shall be without maintenance responsibility. These roads shall be maintained by the owner/applicant until such time as it is accepted for maintenance by the North Carolina Department of Transportation or some other governmental body. Before the Final Plat of Wagon Farm Trails Phases I, II, H & IV Subdivision can be recorded: A. Sewage Disposal 1. Each residential lot shall contain an adequate area for septic disposal, and repair area, approved by the Orange County Division of Environmental Health. 2. The septic system location may restrict the size and location of improvements. This disclosure shall be included in a document describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. The document shall also disclose that information regarding the tentative location of septic systems is available from the Orange County Health Department, Division of Environmental Health. 4 B. Roads and Access 1. Wagon Farm Road, Wagon Court and Trail Drive shall be constructed to standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation, within a 50 foot right-of-way, and the construction shall be inspected and approved by NCDOT. Poplar Drive shall be constructed to standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation, within a 60 foot right-of-way, and the construction shall be inspected and approved by NCDOT. A letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond shall be submitted to secure construction of Poplar Drive, Wagon Farm Road, Wagon Court and Trail Drive to the standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. An estimate of the construction cost must be prepared by a certified/licensed engineer or grading contractor and submitted to the Planning and Inspections Department. The financial guarantee must reflect 110% of that estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina. The document describing development restrictions to be recorded with the Final Plat shall state that the financial guarantee will not be released until the road construction has been inspected and approved by NCDOT. 2. Submit an erosion control plan for construction of the roads. 3. Sight distance triangles shall be provided at each intersection to NCDOT standards. 4. Turn arounds to NCDOT standards shall be provided at the end of Trail Drive and Wagon Farm Road. C. Land Use Buffers and Landscaping 1. Landscaping shall be installed or preserved as indicated on the approved landscape plan, and must be inspected and approved by the Planning and Inspections Department. OR Guaranteed financially through a letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond submitted to secure required landscape installation and preservation. An estimate of the cost for required preservation, plantings and their installation must be provided. The financial guarantee shall reflect 110 percent of the estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina. 2. Provisions for protection of existing trees as shown on the approved landscape plan shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 5 D. Parkland 1. Cash in the amount of $2,135.00 [($2,339/acre x 7/35 acre)] + [($1,824/acre x 32/35 acre)] shall be paid to Orange County as payment in lieu of parkland dedication. E. Drainage • 1. Impervious surface data, as pursuant to Article 6.23.3 of the Zoning Ordinance shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 2. Drainage easements shall be provided as required by the Erosion Control Officer. F. Miscellaneous 1. The Final Plat shall contain a title block and vicinity map in accordance with Section V-D-2 and V-D-3 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. G. Certifications 1. A Certificate of Survey and Accuracy signed by a registered Land Surveyor shall be notarized on the face of the Final Plat. 2. A Certificate of Declaration and Maintenance in the form provided in Section V-D-6-b of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations signed by the landowner and developer shall be on the face of the plat and included in a document describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 3. The Department of Environmental Health shall certify that all residential lots contain sufficient area for septic tank disposal and repair. 4. The North Carolina Department of Transportation shall certify that Poplar Drive, Wagon Farm Road, Wagon Court and Trail Drive have been constructed to State standards or that construction plans have been approved. 5. A Certificate of Approval signed by the Orange County Planning and Inspections Department. Signature of Applicant Clerk to the Board , accept the above listed conditions of subdivision approval, and acknowledge that each must be met prior to recordation of the final plat. c-1 c ►.A rn c c * I c 1/4-, AA 1 AA 1'o e A A A ti n l l t f L K 14 t-1 L MAJOR SUBDIVISION 2/90 ORANGE COUNTY 6 DATE: 8/22/94 PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT (INK ONLY) SUBDIVISION NAME: WaQOn Farm Trails LOCATION: High Rock Road nnAr Poplar Drive OWNER/DEVELOPER: Murray Lynch ADDRESS: 4222 Lynch Store Road TELEPHONE NO.: 563-5472 Mebane, NC 27302 AGENT/CONTACT: same TELEPHONE NO.: 563-5472 • A. SUMMARY INFORMATION: Orange County Tax Map 3 Block Lot(s) 2B & 2 Township Cheeks Zoning District(s): R-1/PW-II Total Number of Acres: 50.5 Phases: Four Total Number of Lots: 39 Averaae Lot Size: 1 acre Minimum Lot Size: 1 acre Number/Type of Structures: (existing) None (proposed) 39 Lineal Feet in Streets: 3074+ LF Acres in Open Space: Water Supply: Public (specify) Community X Individual Wastewater Disposal: Public (specify) Community X Individual School District: Orange High Fire District: Cedar Grove General Land Uses in Area: Farm or residential Critical Areas: stream/drainageways flood prone areas PW/II watershed (specify) historic sites other (explain) Is the property to be subdivided currently under "farm use value taxation"? Yes_ No . If "yes", please contact the Orange County Tax Office. Subdivision of the property may require payment of deferred taxes under "farm use value taxation". B. All plats must be submitted on sheet no smaller than one inch equals two-hundred feet (1"=200') and no larger than one inch equals twenty feet (1"=20') and must contain the following information: X NA subdivision name X `:✓:`•:. zoning of tract and adjacent properties N X : : name & address of owner(s) X i building setback lines by notation or typical lot X name & address of subdivider "`'` layout U ": (if other than owner) X ice;,.`: Location and width of existing and proposed �E X 'a ` name of surveyor, engineer, �;�,� 4.1 Y � 9 ::�..x easements (drainage, utilities, roads, etc.) landscape architect or architect, X ;: existing, proposed and adjoining rights-of-way s~ '`'�'`' address, registration # and seal including dimensions and street names and state .2 L2 X '"f_%`:<• (title) Preliminary Plan Mlf road numbers. Lineal feet of road centerlines and X i scale, north arrrow :1: < <_ .-, rc � '' � approximate acreage o. new street rights-of-way E X date (including revision dates) X iea'`_ existing and proposed utilities, including type, 0 m X township, tax map-block-lot ::.��`.: sizes, hydrants, valves, manholes x z i<�`�`�`" references X i. existing and proposed curbs, gutters and culverts, UX '•X!:'i Parent Parcel Identification # including sizes and grades X f``; deed book and page Hof property X IA location and width of alleys, sidewalks, bike lanes, to be subdivided transit systems, and bus stops (please complete reverse side) X ✓::: boundary described with bearings X :1 ;;;': typical 'street •cross-sections • and intersection 7 si and distances details including design and width of travelway and X ' i' total acreage of the tract and shoulders AV acreage of lots, including and X :::v:;: horizontal alignment and general curve data (public '�`��•f excluding area within rights-of-way i roads) X ?'ice:: control corner X `: centerline radius on all proposed streets X ;j'r> proposed lot lines with dimensions X ; permanent features such as buildings, cemeteries, '" X +✓t,, lot & block numbers ; historic landmarks • X phasin 9 lines X ? adjoining lot layout names of adjoining property • X `•:v' topography at ten foot (10) intervals s: owners. If subdivided, subdivision plat name, plat X water bodies, streams, floodway and book & page number, and perimeter lot numbers. floodplains X ; landscaping and buffer requirements X .k stream buffers X townshi corporate and extra-territorial planning yy > P� Po P m X location and size of parcels dedicated jurisdiction lines which cross the property • ti for public use, recreational use or X location and size of lots of restricted development • c '•.:'. reserved in common, with purpose noted potential and notation on plat regarding same • X impervious surface data (if located in X stormwater detention and/or retention sites and water supply watershed) undisturbed areas for infiltration purposes (if ^ X < )i vicinity map showing general location located in water supply watershed) of subdivision with streets and roads identified by State road number and name C. OTHER SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Twenty-five (25) copies of the preliminary plat. 2. One full size copy of an Orange County Tax map (with tax parcels involved clearly marked in pencil). 3. Where municipal or OWASA sewer is not available, a copy of the Preliminary Plat indicating Health Department soils analysis approval/denial for each lot shown thereon. 4. Where a private road is proposed a written statement by the applicant or his/her authorized representative which sets forth the justification for a private road (see Section IV-B-3-d-1 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations). 5. Auxiliary documents, in draft form, prepared in accordance with Section VI of this Ordinance which assure completion and/or maintenance of improvements required by this Ordinance. Such documents may include, but not be limited to, a private road maintenance agreement, and articles of incorporation and restrictive covenants pertaining to a homeowner's association. These documents may be required as necessary as evidence that the ordinance requirements are being met. I, the applicant, hereby certify that the foregoing application is complete and accurate. I understand that a 5105.00 fee (subdivisions of 1-5 lots), $210.00 fee (subdivisions of 6-9 lots), $315.00 fee (subdivisions of 10-25 lots) or a $420.00 fee (subdivisions of 26 lots or more) is due at the time of application. A 55.00 per lot fee is due at the time the final plat is presented for recordation. yyui\AdetnJ_L.rein...._ \ " ,i APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S SIGNATURE DATE DATE FEES: Amount ��`" 5, �P Date Paid (?)-22 —1� Receipt # 0 7'6. 9 i 88 —.....+.` AN? - / 2D:.. / ' / / • � 1 \\ / f 8 II \ \\, 1 I SEE MAP 29 \` ^,, — 3lI'�f f I �� I ILUCIUS M CHESHIRE . i i0 iF AKA t 1 ' I \ 1920 '4444 ABERDEEN DOWNS ' QI I0.0 1dC I 1 1 \ 184.8 AC. 1 1 I I \ 1 •• 1e. 'ss'` E ) 1 1 l i I ears. • ( • •1�1 I I 1 I I to03dC ' .455'7 .....7.IJ les ( 106 N 9E �_ 10.25A;. 1Ql I1 I1 I - 1 ( I 1001x: i 11 I 1,i 1 .\ 11 i • it °1 ►W 11 r r t 1. 1 al _ 1°1 .7914 0 I i•1 {`���+�) o7S6 I 1 I4I 1 10.013 AC. ill 1 3G.oa ii.e.1 1 ( i6 Ie 7A 1' a II r---------- ii �43.47 AC. IOB I _ _ SO EASE MEtJ� 9279 i 78 O640 1` fO 124 3191 ,, .x4oi 21.107 _ f'� 4 01 AC. I I �'�_ I. el 4027 tir Oro 33.4 AC. i° J (•'-`fir i . f 2 87 48 AC. 3 I 1 0. es 2 5093 W ;I I 2 02 AC. ,hr C v I 4- A. 2 i .X A. E. 1 . 1 • 1 . 1 • 1 . r'1 �; i WAGON FARM TRAILS Phases I, II, III & IV ,, Applicant: Murray Lynch Zoning: R-1 & PW-II LUP: Rural Residential and Protected Watershed 9 FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR WAGON FARM TRAILS SUBDIVISION RESIDENTIAL SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH Prepared by The Orange County Planning Department October, 1994 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Wagon Farm Trails is a proposed 39-lot major subdivision located in Cheeks Township on the north side of High Rock Road east of Mill Creek Road. The total area of the subdivision is 50.3 acres, and the current zoning is R-1 Residential. The average lot size is approximately 1.19 acres. All lots will be served by individual wells and septic tanks, and public roads. For Wagon Farm Trails, project build-out is estimated at eight years. Housing units will be constructed, beginning in 1995, with completion of the project scheduled for 2002. Units will consist of detached single-family homes,and the applicant estimates the average sales price to be$110,000,including the lot. METHODOLOGY Fiscal impact analysis is a projection of the direct, current, public costs and revenues associated with residential and non residential growth in the jurisdiction in which the growth is taking place. Fiscal impact analysis considers only direct impact in that it projects only the primary costs that will be incurred and the immediate revenues that will be generated. It calculates the financial effect of a planned development or new subdivision by considering the current costs and revenues such a development would generate if it were completed and occupied today.Fiscal impact analysis does not consider the private costs of public action. It is concerned only with public (governmental) costs and revenues. The method used in preparing the fiscal impact analysis is the Service Standard Approach. While only gross expenditures by service category are derived from the Per Capita Method,the Service Standard method determines the total number of additional employees by service function that will be required as a result of growth. This method employs average county government costs per person, average school costs per pupil, an employee to population ratio, and average operating expenses per employee for each service category and school district. The number of new employees are projected and multiplied times the average operating expenses (includes personnel,operating and capital costs)per employee. These average costs are then weighed against per capita and per pupil revenues to project the total net fiscal impact of the development. TABLE OF CONTENTS 10 SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH PROJECT FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Section 1 - Project Data Project Name, Township, School District Beginning Year, Ending Year, Inflation Characteristics of Households Construction Schedule/Cost Data Section 2 - Local Government and School District Data Budget Year Per Capita Revenues Per Capita Expenditures Per Student Expenditures School District Per Employee Expenditures Employees Per 1000 Population County Per Employee Expenditure Other Data Other Model Constants School District Data Section 3 - Demographic Projections Based On Project Data Total Housing Total Population School Children Additional County Employees Total School District Additional Employees Section 4 - Projected Net Fiscal Impact on County Tax Base Revenues Expenditures Net Fiscal Impact Section 5 Projected Net Fiscal Impact on School District Revenues Expenditures Net Fiscal Impact Section 6 - Summary of Projected Impacts Additional Housing Additional Population Additional School Children Tax Base County Government Balance School District Balance Total Net Fiscal Impact EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND DATA SOURCES EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND DATA SOURCES ii SECTION 1 • PROJECT DATA Project data includes information about the specific development project. Much, if not all, of the information is supplied by the applicant. Data inputs include: Project Name: Name of the project. Township: Township in which the project is located. School District: School district in which the project is located. Beginning Year: The first year of the project in which dwelling units are completed and occupied. • Ending Year: The last year in which dwelling units are completed and occupied. The template is set to calculate fiscal impacts for a ten-year period. Inflation Rate: Unless an inflation rate is entered, the template will calculate fiscal impacts based on constant dollars. Since the inflation rate changes frequently, the Finance Department must be contacted for the most recent figure. Persons/Household:The estimated average number of persons/household(dwelling unit) based on 1990 Census data for the township in which the project is located. This information is supplied by the Planning Department and will be updated as necessary using population projections and building permit data. Children/Household: The estimated average number of school age children/household (dwelling unit) based on 1990 Census data for the township in which the project is located. This information is supplied by the Planning Department and will be updated as necessary using school membership data. %Non-Elderly:N.C.General Statutes permit an$11,000 exemption to the elderly and disabled who meet certain income criteria. In the event that elderly units are part of the project, the percentage of eligible non-elderly units is entered. The tax base will automatically be adjusted to reflect the exemption. Number of Homes: The number of dwelling units to be constructed in the project in each year. Average Sales Price:The average sales price of all dwelling units based on the number and sales price of dwelling unit types to be constructed in each year. • SECTION 2 - LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA 12 Local government data includes information regarding expenditures required to °:::ride County services and revenues received based on the approved Orange County budget for the fisc: ar in which the project is considered for approval.All information derived from the approved budget r as constant throughout a fiscal year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of a new bud.: Local government revenue and expenditure information is compiled on a per capita (per person) basis. Per capita figures are derived by dividing the total expenditures for a particular service function or revenue source by the estimated population of Orange County for the year in which the projec considered for approval. Populations estimates are prepared by the Planning Department. Data inputs include the following: Budget Year: The current fiscal year; i.e., 1993-94. Per Capita Revenues: The sources of revenue by major category are as follows: Taxes-Other Than Property:Revenues from taxes other than property taxes include those from sales and use taxes, franchise taxes, and animal taxes. Intergovernmental Aid: Revenues from this source, in the form of categorical aid or shared-tax revenues, are provided through State and federal assistance programs. Service Charges: Service (or user) charges support numerous functions and are charged to those who voluntarily receive governmental services or use governmental facilities. Miscellaneous: Miscellaneous revenues include interest earnings on investments, proceeds from license and permit fees, and all other revenues. Per Capita Expenditures: Expenditures by major category are as follows: General Government: Services related to the legislative, administrative, financial, and legal functions of government. Public Safety: Law enforcement services and emergency medical services. Public Works: Efforts related to the maintenance of County-owned property and the provision of sanitation (solid waste disposal) services. Human Services: Departments responsible for the provision of health, social, and recreation-related services. Education: Orange County supports two school units, the Orange County school system and the Chapel - Hill\Carrboro school system. This category includes appropriations made to the designated school system for Recurring Capital items. Recurring Capital funds are used for general maintenance,purchase of new equipment/furnishings and vehicle maintenance. Non-Departmental: Contributions to agencies providing cultural and social services outside the formal structure of county government. Other expenditures include equipment replacement and contingency funds. Although there are no employees generated by this category, it has been included as an operating expenditure. It will be included in Section 4, "Total Annual County Expenditure." These expenditures will be calculated on a per capita basis as opposed to a per employee basis. Per Student Expenditures:Information regarding expenditures required to provide educational services 13 and revenues received are based on the approved school system budgets for the fiscal year in which the project is considered for approval. All information derived from the approved budgets remains constant throughout a fiscal year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of new budgets. Expenditure information is compiled on a per student basis for County Government Current Expense, School District and State appropriations. County Government Current Expense funds are used for general operation purposes including Instruction and Support Services. Federal revenues and expenditures and other local revenues such as Fund Balance have not been included since they are not directly growth related. Per student figures are derived by dividing the total appropriation for educational purposes from a particular source by the estimated number of students to be enrolled in the applicable school system for the year in which the project is considered for approval. Student enrollments are obtained from the approved school system budgets. County Government: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations to the school systems by Orange County for Current Expense. The minimum level of per student appropriation is determined by the State Board of Education. School District:Expenditures in this category are unique to the Chapel Hill-Carrboro school system and are based on the level of expenditures possible through assessment of a supplementary school tax. State: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations from the State Board of Education. School District Per Employee Expenditure: Expenditures per employee based on County, School District and State appropriations, and the total number of school district employees. Employees Per 1000 Population: The number of employees in a particular service category per 1000 population. County Per Employee Expenditure: The average operating and capital expenses per employee in a particular service category. Total expenses in each category includes personnel,operating and capital costs. Other Data: County Government Tax Rate: The County tax rate per $100 of assessed valuation. Since the per capita method focuses only on operating expenditures,the tax rate is reduced by an amount equal to the debt service payments from property taxes for capital projects. School District Tax Rate:The supplementary tax assessed on behalf of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro school system. Assessment Ratio:The ratio of market (sales)value to assessed value based on information supplied by the Tax Office. The assessment ratio is used to convert market value to assessed value for the purpose of computing the tax base. Other Model Constants Elderly Exemption:For projects developed partially or exclusively for elderly(65 and older) or disabled individuals whose annual income does not exceed$12,000, an$11,000 tax exemption is used in projecting the tax base. School District Employees Per Student: The number of employees per student in a specific school district. • 14 SECTION 3 - DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA Demographic projections provide information about the number of new residents and school children anticipated in Orange County resulting from project development.Projections also provide the number of additional employees required per service function and school district as a result of the new development. Total Housing Units: The cumulative total of new housing units added each year by project development. Total Population: The total population added each year by a project derived by multiplying the number of homes to be constructed by the number of persons per household (see Section 1). School Population: The total number of school children added each year by a project derived by multiplying the number of homes constructed by the number of children per household (see Section 1). Additional County Employees: The number of additional employees required per service category based on project development. Total: Total of all additional county employees required based on project development. School District Additional Employees: The number of additional employees required per school district based on the project development. SECTION 4 - PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON COUNTY Tax Base: The tax base represents the increase in assessed property value expected each year resulting from project development.The values shown are in$1,000's and are derived from a formula which includes the number and sales price of homes, and the assessment ratio. Where applicable, the percentage of non-elderly units and elderly exemption are also used. Revenues:All revenues are derived from a formula which multiplies the per capita revenues (Section 2) times the projected population (Section 3). The exception to this is the property tax which multiplies the tax base times the county government tax rate. Expenditures: All expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies the per employee expenditure (Section 2) times the number of additional employees (Section 3). Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures and projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs Orange County more to provide services to a project than it receives in revenues.A positive net balance indicates that more revenues are received than it costs to serve a project. Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset negative balances in another. 15 SECTION 5 - PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT Revenues: The County contribution is derived by transferring education expenditures by County government(Section 4).Revenues derived from the school district tax are derived by multiplying the school district tax times the tax base. State revenues are derived by multiplying the per student expenditure figure times the total projected number of school children (Section 3). Expenditures: Expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies each per student expenditure (Section 2) times the total projected number of school children (Section 3) and adding the results. Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures and projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs the school system more to provide educational services for children in a project than it receives in revenues.A positive net balance indicates that more revenues are received than it costs to serve a project. Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset negative balances in another. SECTION 6 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED IMPACTS RESIDENTIAL FISCAL IMPACT'TEMPLATE: SERVICE STANDARD METHOD Bureau of Economic & Business Research — University of Florida 16 Modified 11/5/93 — Orange County,NC Planning Department SECTION 1 — PROJECT DATA: ENTER THE FOLLOWING DATA FOR EACH PROJECT: PROJECT: Wagon Farm Trails Subdi'.ision .. . TOWNSHIP: Cheeks CONSTRUCTION PERIOD: Beginning Year: 1995 Ending Year: 2002 - Inflation Rare:CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSEHOLDS: Persons/House: 2. 6 Children/House: 0.49 • • •: HOME SALES DATA: Average Distribution Number of Sales Price of Units Year Homes ($) • by Year 1995 5 110000 12.82% 1996 5 110000 12.82% 1997 5 110000 12.82% 1998 5 110000 12.82% 1999 5 110000 12.82% 2000 5 110000 12.82% 2001 5 110000 12.82% 2002 4 110000 10.26e. • 04 0 0 0.00% SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: ENTER"1"IN( )BESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT IN WHICH PROJECT IS TO BE LOCATED TO GENERATE STUDENT DISIRIBUTION BY SCHOOL TYPE. School District: School Attendance:........ ....... Chapel Hill—Carrboro ( 0 ) High School 27% .......... Middle School .........23%. SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN/HOUSEHOLD: ENTER NUMBER OF UNITS BY HOUSING TYPE TO GENERATE NUMBER OF SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN. Children School Age Housing Type Units Per House Children Single—Family 39 0.49 19 .....Duplex/Triplex/Quadplex Town House Totals 39 0.49 19 SECTION 2 — LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA 17 BUD T YE AR= 1993 94 COUNTY POPULATION: 100758 SCO;OL IMISTRIGT STI7ENT POPULA'�'[ON 5444: COUNTY EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER CAPITA General.Goyernmenl 108.60....... .. 0;0011 Public Safety 134.00 0.0013 <:Public Works ::.:.:. 5000. O'0005< Human Services 24629 0.0024 Educatic n.(Sehool:D�striet):: :7260Q! 0:0072.: SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER STUDENT COUNTY PER CAPITA REVENUES ($): REVENUES PER CAPITA Taxes — Other Than Property 4127000 4096 Intergovernmental 8778421 87.12 Miscellaneous 787197 7.81 COUNTY PER CAPITA EXPENDITURES ($): EXPENDITURES PER CAPITA General Government; 6251551 62 05`> Public Safety 5854402 58.10 Public Works 2760'727 27 40 ......... .......................................................... ...... ...................................................................................................................................... ... ............ .. . ........ Human Services 15528989 154.12 4 '. ................... Non—Departmental 2343967 . 23.26 COUNTY PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURE ($): EXPENDITURES PER EMPLOYEE PublicSafety.........Public Sa e '...................... .........................................................-.................................................... ...................................85440.....................................7 Pub cWQr7 72'1.:::;::;° « 552I4S4 Human Services 15528989 63051.64 SCHOOL DISTRICT PER STUDENT EXPENDITURES (3): EXPENDITURES PER STUDENT School District 0 0.00 '��� : :.::f::''.:::.!::.:::::::i::::j.:.:L:..:::::::::: �i::::i:::::i:.i:':::::.::�:.:::::::•,v:�.:. ::..:.:i::::::v::::ii::::i::ii::i: ::::::.:::�i::::i:i:::::.;�: SCHOOL DISTRICT PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURES (S): EXPENDITURES PER EMPLOYEE County Government '74201.'72 10220 62 School District 0 0.00 TAX DATA: ENTER APPLICABLE ASSESSMENT RATIO AND ELDERLY EXEMPTION: n. County Tax Rate ($) 0 7460 Per$I00 Assessed Valuation School District Tax Rate ($) 0.0000 Per$100 Assessed Valuation Assessment Ratio .::....: 100,00 Elderly Exemption 0 $11,000 Where Applicable SECTION 3 — DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA 1R , YEAR 1995 1996 1997: 1998 x999 HOUSING UNITS 5:: 10 15 POPULATION 20 25; 13 27 40: 53 6'z. SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 1 2 4 5 Middle 6 1 1 2: 2 High School 1 2, TOTAL 3 2 5 T. 10 3 12' COUNTY GOVERNMENT ? .. ..... ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES ... General Government 0 0 0.0 0 0. 01 a.l Public Safety 40 0.0 0 1 0.1 01<' Public Works 00 0.0 00: 0.0 0.0 Human Services a t 0.1 01 0.1 ....:; 0 2.: TOTAL :...... 01 0.1 0 2 SCHOOL DISTRICT <::::'<::>::>:::: 01 0.2 03: 0.4 ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES YEAR 2000 2001 2002: 2003 2004.:: HOUSING UNITS0 35 39: 39 39 POPULATION •....>::::.::.;::::::::: 80 >::>>:::::>:: ;;::::..< 93 10 104 19 SCHOOL O L CH ILD REN Elementary 9.: Middle High School 4 5 5; 5 TOTAL 15 17 5< COUNTY GOVERNMENT RNNT :< ADDITIONAL AL EMPLOYEES : iiiigg;:zs >?:;E::.;> General Government Public bhc Safety 01 0.1 01:. 0.1 a1 Public Works ` 0 0• 01 0.1 O1 Human Services •0 2 02 0 3; TOTAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 06 0.7 a: 0.7 :: 0 7, ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES :: SECTION 4 — PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON COUNTY GOVERNMENT 19 YEAR 1995 1996 1997: 1998 999:• TAX BASE($1000} 550 1116 1698; 2298 2914'. REVENUES ($) Property Tax 4103': 8325 12669< 17140 21740: Other Taxes 545 1121 1730; 2374 3454:: Intergovernmental 1154 2385 3681 5050 6496 Service Charges 392, 807 1245; 1708 2197.: Miscellaneous 109. 214 334: 453 582; TOTAL ($) 6302 12851 19656 26725 34069 EXPENDITURES ($) _:: < General Government 825. 1698 2621 3596 4626;! Public Safety 773 1590 2455: 3368 4332:; Public Works 364 750 1158 1588 2043 Human Services >: :.. 24St�.. 4219 ;::>:<:>: 6S 11: 8933 1.1491:;.;. Education 3438 7076 10922; 14985 192741 Non—Departmental 309 637 983. 1348 1734:: TOTAL ($) .........................................?; 7760 15970 24650 33819 .... . .4350U NET FISCAL IMPACT ($) 1458: —3119 4994 —7094 :.;: .. ..::9431; YEAR 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004! TAX BASE($1000) 3599 4202 4763 . 4902 ` .... 5044 REVENUES Property Tax 26473 31344 . : 35535 36566 . . 37626: Other Taxes ?> > 3771 4527 5190. 5341 5496: Intergovernmental $021 9629 11041 11361 11690: Service Charges i >:>>:::::::<:2713 • 3257 : ::;::.;;:;::;;»;.: 3734. 3843 3954:. Miscellaneous > . : .:. . 719 863 X90,: 1019 1048: TOTAL ($) : 4169!7 49620 56491. 58129 59815 EXPENDITURES ($) General Government 5712:: 6857 '7863 8091 8325 Public Safety 5349. 6422 7363 7577 7796.; Public Works 2522' 3028 ... ".,,. ..34'12 3573 3676 Human Services X4181 17034 1531:, 20097 20680:: Education 2384E} 28572 32761: 33711 34688; Non—Departmental 214 2571 2948 3033 3121 TOTAL ($) .53714 64454 7393'1 72363°°3805078799137111 6081 78288: NET FISCAL IMPACT ($} 12017,:; —14864 1744b< —17952 18473 SECTION 5 - PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT 20 YEAR 199 ; 1996 1997`: 1998 :: :1999: REVENUES ($) County 3438` 7076 10922 14985 19274 School District 0 p 0: 0 0 State 7914 16287 25139; 34490 44363 TOTAL ($) • 11• 352 23363 36060` 49475 63637 EXPENDITURES ($) County 3438 7076 10922: 14985 19274:• School District p 0 .0. State 7914 16287 25139 34490 44363 TOTAL ($) • 11352' 23363 36060 49475 63637' NET FISCAL IMPACT($) ;:.:.: .. .Q. 0 0 YEAR 2000, 2001 2002: 2003 2004: REVENUES ($) County 23800 28572 32761 33711 : 34688! School District 0 p 0 0 0 State 54779' 65762 75403 77590 : 79840 TOTAL ($) 785'7.9 94334 108164:: 111301 : 114528:: EXPENDITURES ($) County ;;: 2 3$04 28572 32761: 33711 34688: • School District : : . . €1 State .. : ::::;; 54▪779 65762 75403: 77590 79840 TOTAL ($) 78579 9433.4 1.08164' 111301 11.4528: NET FISCAL IMPACT($) : . .:: ... 0 ::,f}< 0 < 0 • 4� SECTION 6 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED DEMOGRAPHIC/FISCALIMPACTS 2� YEAR 1995 1996 1997 1998 19.99:. HOUSING UNTTS 5, 10 -. 15'! 20 25;` POPULATION 13 27 40 : 53 6T SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 6 Middle 1 1 High School 1! TOTAL. _...2 5 7 10 12 COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0 1 0.1 0 2 0.3 0.4 i SCHOOL EMPLOYEES 0 0.2 0 3 0.4 ,.0 5 TAX BASE($loon) 550 1116 1698; 2298 2914 COUNTY BUDGET(S) Revenues 6302. 12851 19656 26725 34069:; Expenditures 7760 15970 24650; 33819 43500 BALANCE 1458 —3119 4994 —7094 9431 SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET($) ;' Revenues 11352 23363 36060: 49475 63637'. Expenditures .<.. :€..<: 132 23363 36Q60: 49475 63637: BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 COMBINED BUDGETS($) ?''':::'?: Revenues ;` 17655 36214 55716: 76200 97706= Expenditures 1 1],2 39333 607L0 83294 107137 BALANCE _,::1458:? —3119 .,,,,,,:.::.,,,,„,,,,,,,,,,,,-.......•....,........994;; —7094 —9431. YEAR 2000 2001 2002. 2003 2004• HOUSING UNITS 35 39 39 39 POPULATION 8t1 93 104. 104 104'. SCHOOL CHILDREN H Element >:>' �'Y Middle � 4 4 4 4: High School 4 ; 5 g TOTAL 15 17 19 19 19; COUNTY EMPLOYEES ` ` .:.::.:.:;; q4 0.5 06. 0.6 06 SCHOOL EMPLOYEES :;;::>:::: >.;::::„ 0 6 0.7 0 7 0.7 0 7 TAX BASE($i000) :`>:: »::::::35451 4202 4763 4902 5044> COUNTY BUDGET($) Revenues ;»:>.410'1 49620 56491: 58129 5981.5 Expenditures 53714 64484 73937 76081 78288: BALANCE ;:;:' X201? —14864 1446 —17952 18473: SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET $ Revenues 7859 94334 .,:::: :::::B::::: :..-':::::.1::',.::::=.110.81:0+:': 111301 114528] Expenditures ':: 7855'7 94334 108164 111301 114528 BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0< COMBINED BUDGETS($) z><: Revenues 12027f 143955 16Q655: 169430 174343:'. Expenditures 132293: 158818 182101: 187382 12816: BALANCE 12017:; —14864 17446: —17952 18473 22 HOUSEHOLD OCCUPANCY CHARACTERISTICS FOR ORANGE COUNTY, NC BY TOWNSHIP (1l (2) (3) :(4) (5) Children ' Children School Age: School"Age. Number Persons Persons Under 18 Under 18 : Children . Ch ldren Iu Per zn Per In ]?er .. Township..,.. .;Hoiiseholds::: Households: <Household..:Households.; Household Household's Household' 1990 CENSUS Binghau�. ..... 2156 :.... 5177 :: 2 4th: .... ..::: 1122 .::. Q 52 721 :0.33. Cedar Grove 1345 3676 2.73 865 0.64 624 :.:::::.:::.::.:.::..:::::.:._.::::.:.:........................._.. 0.46 Gllagli ;::....;::>:>::::»»> 23942........::.::. :5310&.....: ....;. :.: ?22 : X939.:: 0.42: 6980 9;29; Cheeks 2036 5422 2.66 1340 0.66 999 0.49 ..............::;.:.:•.;•.;:;. :.>::;; <;:::.;.:. 203' ::.:.....::::::::»> <::: ::;.:.;:<::::::;::;:>;: . .......................................::. 524�::<:::;;: ........>2.5'� . 12$8: 0.63 ::< .:;:;::;::;;:»:> <. . Hillsborough 3811 9816 2.58 2567 0.67 1777 0.47: > <; :; ; >:<::::: ::: :::: :;: ; : .: ; > :: : , . : ?t_ . . a , 00 ; .. 442 ;Q 2 Orange County 36104 84627 2.34 17698 0.49 ,12399 0.34 1980 CENSUS- .... .tiara.... ...: i:iii:::.: >.:;::,:;.>;.:. Cedar Grove 1176 3166 2.69 919 0.78 N/A 0.66 Hall.. .::;::;::>:::::;:»::>:: . . . :>:::>::»::::::;::::>::>::: :.:. ;:><:> ;:::<::>:<;.;>:«:>: 8503.:...._............ ><:<::::>>::>:>::::: ... .1�.................................::: ::::........................:::.�::::.. 05. .........................2.72:::......._........... 79.:::::,.............::::. : . ;:<<:>:;:�::;:::::<:>.:;.. »::;:><:<::;:,<:;......... .............................:..::......................:.............::........................:........... Cheeks 1693 4821 2.85 1466 0.87 N/A 0.70 F.7goU» ? z ..?'2'> >??!`>>>z >s ' : ;77`< ` ` a?:3< : ;<;»?>» '. ?. ::::.:>;;;;;;>::::::: :.:: . ....................... ......................445 :::::.:..>:::.:::::. ..................................:: ::: .:::�:� ::::: ::: :.::;:;:<:<::;:;:.::::: 123 4:.:. :.:; . ; .. ::.0.b�.;;..>:.:. ::. : .: .. . ;:.;:;:.:...;:.:<.:;.;:.:;.;; .. ..........................................:..:.....:......:.........:.:..........::.:..:..................................:.. Hillsborough 3233 8599 2.66 2421 0.75 N/A 0.65 >la t vet ;: ? >:»>> >:>::< :> .>, ::? »<:. ............. 576.................._;:.. :. ...:..: ;:>::.;.:::;::;.::::::: :.: :.::::.:.::.;::.:::. . . . .:... .........._. ....... . .._...1493:::...:..:.::.:.::::.;.:.;25 ::.;;;;:.;;;:;;:;;;.;.<: :. ...;.;...::::.:::..:::... • ,,.,.. ,..,.,,. � :.;. .. ..::. 443.:.: ;: 0 77. ;; 1�FfA; , : 0.6t;:; Orange County 28707 77055 2.68 15879 0.55 N/A N/A NOTES: (1)Number of households included under 1980 Census data is number of housing units. (2)Persons in households included 1980 Census data includes population in households as well as group quarters. (3)Number of children under 18 years of age includes children living in group quarters due to lack of breakdown by household in available Census data. (4)Data not available from 1980 Census. (5)1980 data calculated using demographic multipliers from "The New Practitioner's Guide to Fiscal Impact Analysis"by Burchell,Listokin,and Dolphin. • GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES- FY 1993-94 ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET 23 • 1993 ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION 100758 % OF % OF PER CAPITA TYPE AMOUNT SUBTOTAL TOTAL EXPENSE GENERAL GOVERNMENT Commissioners .:.:.. ... :..... .$304,099 4 869b 0 5990 . $3.02 Courts $11,000 0.18% 0.02% $0.11 Elections _._.:. .... .::$261,283 ..... . 4.1.$%:: .......'< ..0 51°6 ......... .... . .:..$2 . Manager $521,356 8.34% 1.01% $5.17 Personnel .. $357,133. ..::::.5.71%::. 0 69%... ..... ......... Budget $148,268 2.37% 0.29% $1.47 Finance::.<: .... $239,849. .....::..3 84%,:. .:..::.. .047% . . ....._. .... . :;:,$2 38 Purchasing $159,082 2.54% 0.31% $1.58 Data Processing $425,353 680%.. 083% $4 22` Central Services $653,144 10.45% 1.27% $6.48 R t f: .: ? n:".::;I"..::'s:::; i'nli<::;:i: ;$58J.4.41::: 9 4396.:;: 4 :?:%: :>::< 65::. :...:egrsera:r.ee ls.::. .. . .:.: :. ::.:. . .:::: ::.:::....:::::;::::-:: :..::..: .::. ):.1...90 ::::::,.:. $5 Tax Assessor. $723,433 11.57% 1.40% $7.18 .... .... .. . ;Land Records..:. ..:°....... ;:::::::,;:;.:<::::::.:;.:: :> :::.;:..::, :.:<''r�s:.. . .. $3.15,635" . 5 0596 >:' .':. :> 0 61% ::>::>::>::»:: .::.::.::.... $3.1 Tax Collector $310,467 4.97% 0.60% $3.08 Piannlrig&lnspec ens .. .;.....$i,2... i.. .... 19 7196;; ; ;:. , .:;..2389x' . ,.: .... :::$1223,; SUBTOTAL $6,251,551 100.00% 12.14% $62.05 • PUBLIC SAFETY :::%: ::<:::z:< '.:::::::>:<'.::>::::»<:> 84219 .,; .65.6396.: .......7.4690 0::::< ::::::. ..$38.:1.3: :.Sheaf:.::::::::::.::::.:::::... .:::::::..::.:.::::::.::::.::::::::::::::::.:::::.::...:::.::....:. .....$3..... ...................-........ . .................................................................. ..:...::. Domestic Valence $38,188 0.65% 0.07% SP'. .!! 9. 1.9:59:: ::.;::.:;;;;: ;;;: ;:;; ...::::.:.::::.:::.:...:.: ::::::: '€ 74 017>•:.:.,.::::.::>::;33 72. ::;::>:�;::::.;:::::;.<•:3..83 .......:.:,:.:::::.::::::... ,:EmeFgencySen4ces_.. ....:;•.;:::.::>:;.. ..:::<:<:,<;:..: .. : >:: ,:,$ .�. _ :_. :,. ;:., _,.. 96...... ,...�.:::.:::::..:::::...._....:$ :::, SUBTOTAL $5,854,402 100.00% 1137% $58.10 PUBLIC WORKS $1,507FOQz..::: ....: .: 54 59°6 :>:>:< :>:<:;: �s390 $14,96 Other $177,134 6.42% 0.34% $1.76 :.::.::.::: $0.72 t r. .cal••. :.......:.............:..._._::.. . ;;::.:;.;. .... .....:$72:38? :..::...::::::. .2.f2%...;:>:::>;;:.::»;: Q 14°t'o::;>:::t;<::r>.............. .. Sanitation $1,004,204 36.37% 1.95% $9.97 • SUBTOTAL $2,760,727 100.00% 5.36% $27.40 HUMAN SERVICES :;'s>::' : ::.;::::::;::::;>s a><:: 162 528::>: 1.,05°6 4 3�'%::>::>:z:>:<::;:i<....... ....... $1 fit.; S.arE:&:Water.:..:..:.::»;»::::::::::;:*;>::;::>:::<>;:;::::»::;>:.<:;:<;::::.........:.... ..... ........$ � ........... ...... ...................... .........................._.......... Economic Develo ment $187,691 1,21% 0.36% $1.86 . 6 1. @: .0 :C!:::::::i<tiii r ...........:......:........ Iz:i°: ::: $91.95 043. ::i _:59 21.:96::>: ii>::ii.. 1 f. 86%;ia%ii,'iii: i:i?`r'i%i i;f%: :: 1:26• Health $3,367,943 21.69% 6.54% $33.43 . ..:':. . :::><<::>:;:.::::: '.;::;:::<:::'.:::;r:::::::: 269,945 <:3::: :> :''::<0.529(s>:<:".«:> :::>:>:::<:i::::::r:: 2 6$: :A rrcu€t urn€Exie rSalon::;:z:<:;;::::. .]:::::::^:::z::::::: ::: :::.. .:....:..•...:.,. . :.:..: x.74%.. ::::.:::.:::::::.:::::.$:..:..• $5.39 Recreation& Parks $542,847 : A rn ............................:. ............ .........$5 ..1 2 .. 3.32%:.::: ?':::::>:>:::::s::x:;OQ%: ......: .<`>:<':;_:`<::> $E 12 CAT $407,979 2.63% 0.79% $4.05 amte o 3 408 0 Corn... ..for Women :>>:> 6149E :<<<,z $0 3 Library $393,934 2.54% 0.76% $3.91 Child Support $411 559:: 26596;:'. 0.809x7 :: <> .:. $4.08: SUBTOTAL $15,528,989 100.00% 30.15% $154.12 • GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES— FY 1993-94 ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET 24 (CONTINUED) 1993 ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION 100758 I • % OF % OF PER CAPITA TYPE AMOUNT. SUBTOTAL TOTAL EXPENSE EDUCATION Current Expense OrangeCounty $742o172 396% 1441% $7364 Chapel Hill $9,838,134 52.45% 19.10% $97.64 Recurring Capital Orange County $750 coo 400% 1 46% $744 Chapel Hill $750,000 4.00% • 1.46% $7.44 SUBTOTAL $18,758,306 100.00% 36.43% $186.17 NON—DEPARTMENTAL iigency Contributions $1.893,978 80.80% 3.68% $18.80 , . Fund Tranfers $15,000 0.64% 0.03% $0.15 Miscelfaneous 5434,989 18.56% 0.a4% $4.32 SUBTOTAL $2,343,967 100.00% 4.55% $23.26 FUND TOTAL $51,497,942 100.00% 100.00% $511.11 Source:FY 1993-94 Approved Budget,Orange County,N.C. • 25 GENERAL FUND REVENUES - FY 1993-94 ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET 1993 ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION 100758 % OF % OF PER CAPITA TYPE AMOUNT SUBTOTAL TOTAL REVENUE PROPERTY TAXES Gurr.ent Taxee $36,119,679 98 339E ;. 676496 ;$358.48'• Delinquent Taxes $475,000 1.29% 0,89% $4.71 :(nterest on Delinqu.nt Taxes $140,00Q 038% 0 26% $1 39 Late Listings $0 0.00% 0.00% $0.00 Vehicle UstPenafttes ::...: $6.< 000%: :; . '0.00% $0.00:- SUBTOTAL $36,734,679 100.00% 68.80% $36458 OTHER LOCAL TAXES :Sales and Use'iax;>::::::::::?i • ....... ........ . ..... ..$3,950,000. .95 71% 740% $3920; Privilege Ucense Tax N/A 0.00% 0,00% $0,00 FranahiseT ::>:`>»::<a::::`::::::>:;»::::»>>:::>»>::;:>.*:*::>::::,:>:::: 107004 • _.2.59%96: ' >.:>`::>::>:....:0.204fi.... ;;;<::<:i::<:.... 1..©6: Animal Tax $70,000 1,70% 0.13% $0.69 SUBTOTAL $4,127,000 100.00% 7.73% $40.96 INTERGOVERNMENTAL i-.to ibles T 2 073 000 :: 3.61 :: 5 ...n n ax......:...............................:::> ;111:>::::.......................:.._.:...... .. 2 .96 ....................3.889'0:::::<»z1:...:........:.:.$20. 7. Beer&Wine Tax . $157,437 1.79% 0.29% $1,56 906?: :,:<•:,.8 : ,� :.,; . 89 63 1'1:'::::::::1:2<>> 443 D 3 `:1;:;;'1:::;::::1::1:;" >'> . 6 ...... ..........::.:.........:.:..::..::...:...::...:2..2...2....2....:.:........... :. rrr<i;<:;:: Social Services $4,523,440 51.53% 8.47% $44.89 ;y:;i': >::;::>;::<::::;>: *if:i*::G;::;:;1: 111:6»::; ; :>:::.:<:»:.:'::1:::::;i:;;;i::i>::»:::: y 1,..:,,x;:;:: :::i;i:.).*f . ;.::;::::;:«:: :: .1`:i:•i1: :: ::: . . ..... ........... .. ................... :;Ain GAT::::::i:<:::::: zi<..:: ::::>:; .......zi?E:::::::::::::?#:::::: :>: : `::<:::5i;_.:..:...:$320,535:I:::::>:;>:>::>::..365%.::;:;:::><:<:::;....460%::::::>:: :::»:::::>:<:<: >'::.. Other State $789,946 9.00% 1.48% $7.84 1;.;0 00::;:' .21• iii; ti:::::isf1:;i:::�'S; ;:;>: i !i`2`i:;::i?it::>ii �::i::::: �i:1>iii:'iii:i':G `ii;ii:: ::'vif?G2:.: .::i:i:i::;:i{%i :.;;:;::<;:11 11::1:;Y1<:;:::� .. .. . ................... s : "r>: :::.$� :�::::•:::.:..:.� •22.22. SUBTOTAL $8,778,421 100.00% . 16.44% $87.12 . SERVICE CHARGES F1e inter.:af.Re §.>:::::::::::;:;:::::::> . :::.:::: ,1'902 :: 7 •.:::. .05. ed ...... ..................::::::::::11x2:1::»:::z:1::1:<<»::::»::::.....:........ .... ...$9 3Q 1. ::::: ::�::':....1. . .%.....:..........:........ .....$9 Land Records $30,975 1.04% 0,06% $0.31 :92'000':s: »>;::::..3:140 >: `:: . 0.91.!: n n e ;� :1E..hlR.n! _ �3E..::: .;::>:::::>:>: :s6:E:i::7::::;::: ::>f<::>::::::i:::::>:::;;:::E:E::::::::;::z::<::::i::.. .. .:. �.9 r ......................._ . 9F3.. 'z::: < < ...:4.:4?`1Ci:a>s>;''s` ?c 'S` '>i :....$ ._... ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Sheriff . $767,213 25.84% 1.44% $7.61 :< :::;; >::::<;;:::::»>:::11:1::::.r:;:1i::11::1i::1;4::1::1:::::::1f;x:»:>:;:::::111:;:ss.;;1;1<;r;:;:•;. :::;:111::<;:>::;:: :<;>:;:::.<;221::1 1222;:;;>:> »..EMS $163 620 :.. 5 5196 :'m.;:ii>::: .. 319(s:: >>: :::.>::1:::s:::::«:: 1.62; ::.....:..:.::.:::::.� : :::: . ;;::.:;;22.2.;2.;:;:.:�:.:�;2.2.12.:;;2;.;;2.2:.;1:.;2.;;122: APS Fees $4,200 0.14% 0.01% $0.04 M .4#k::....:::::«:::::1>::::::::•.`::2>:i:.:: ::.:::::: i:;::::::: : >':;> > ::>- :>:> <'.':zs:r j2:`:>.@�q�768:.1.. . ........18.01N:i::i::.:::::22::22:: ...1 % .. ...... .. ..........@C. 1.. Social Services $38,000 1.28% 0.07% $0.38 6. :`><a`:'>: '3>j :i::>`'`<; : 9. 22 . . . ::::: ., . . ::: . *::: .... <::::.::::.�:::::.:.�:::;:::::::::::::.�:::::..;:::::.:::::::::.::::..�:::: :..:....:: 212::;<:a;:.:• . . .............. ... .. ................ .......... .........2.22..2: A i :GAT::'>'.:::::::>:::>:>i>:::::>:1::>:s:»::::>>: ::: >::>::>�::�::::>::::::::».:;:;::::>:>::<: :>:: ...........:$1.91 985:..:;;:::::::?>`t>...6..47%:.:::::;:::::::>:; :::....41:3..9& .2.22.:::......::1;:.:::....$'1.,.:1.. Recreation& Parks $63,412 2.14% 0.12% $0,63 .:... ? •:;1::2;11iisi;Sii: 1;'.ii$;:;%i::;?::::::�i:;:i. j?t:'<:::ri:j:::?ie::>:::>:;::::;. _ :::•1:11:1:;1:::;: .2..2..22.::..... .._........................_ Tax.Collectlon.:Char es.... .::::::::::>::::::::>:::::::;::::::1;:::. : '$7200 . . ..... .................. ... ............ .. o..._.......::...::...2:4296::1:<:<:s:<::>.. .a.�:a�>::<<:>:>: > >`::»: '::>:..$0,7� �:::::: ::::: 9::.:::::::::::::::::.�:::::::::.:::::::::..:::::::.:::.:::::,..::•:::::::,::.�.�:::::::::::::�:.. : : :.:..........:.............................2222. Miscellaneous Charges $99,068 3.34% 0.19% $0.98 SUBTOTAL $2,969,123 100.00% 5.56% $29.47 • 26 • GENERAL FUND REVENUES - FY 1993-94 ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET (CONTINUED) 1993 ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION 100758 % OF % OF PER CAPITA TYPE AMOUNT SUBTOTAL TOTAL REVENUE MISCELLANEOUS $3.0& Licenses&Permits $230,700 29.31% 0.43% $2.29 AD Other Revenue $244s7 31 31% $245 SUBTOTAL $787,197 100.00% 1.47% $7.81 FUND TOTAL $53,396,420 100.00% 100.00% $529.95 Source:FY 1993-94 Approved Budget,Orange County, N.C. • • NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES- FY 1993-94 ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET 27 1993 ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION _ 100758 PERMANENT FTE % OF % OF POSITIONS FUNCTION POSITIONS SUBTOTAL TOTAL PER CAPITA GENERAL GOVERNMENT Commissioners 3225 2 97% 0 t 5%! 0.00003 Courts N/A 0.00% 0.00% 0,00000 Manager 8,000 7.37% 0.37% 0.00008 Personnel :.::. 6 000...: 553% 0 28% 0 00006 Budget 3.000 2.76% 0.14% 0.00003 Purchasing 3,000 2.76% 0.14% 0.00003 Data.Processln ><a::>:::;:< 370 ; ::.:494% _ 0 25% ;>:<: > : : _0 00005;: Central Services 3.000 2.76% 0.14% 0.00003 '3......................:..::.::::::::::::::.:::::.::::::::::.�:::::.�:::::::::.:.::,::::::::.::.:::..:.:..._:...................._..:........_...:.:..:.:._. ....:.::.�.:.:.::.::::::. :.&8�6........................._:.0.. 00..1..5.. Tax Assessor 18.000 16.58% 0.84% 0.00018 ;:>aarid.Aeaar :<:<::::::::::::::::>;::<:::#::: ::;:;:;<:: : ?::;:z;:>::::::;:;:::>>::»::::»::<::<:::::<<i>: :>::;::: 6:000:.; 5.53% ; •><:::;:::.;;::; ::0 ::.....................d5..::::::::::.:..:.::.................................:......:.........::.:.:::::::::::.:::::..:s.:...:..._..._...:.:.:...::..:.:::::::.:..... ...:...............'::.::.0.2&96;.;>::::.>::::..:::.:.:....._...00006. . ................................................................ Tax Collector 6.000 5.53% 0.28% 0.00006 Pla flip &! o.... ;>:>:::>::::::::::::>>::::::::::::::::::::<:::::><:::::«:;;::::::<:::>:;::z:;:>:<::::::•.. 23 750...: 21 8 i::»:: :... 1 ::.0. 0024 ,:: :.. n.. 9.-:nspecti � :,.,: ,.,. >,. :.. :..:__,. , 796.•::._...,: ,. 1 095:..:. SUBTOTAL 108.595 100.00% 5.04% 0.00108 PUBLIC SAFETY e 65 .0 >.S#r rdf........;»:><:» •`::: ::z>: :>':::>s°:'si»z:>>s::#;:>>:>:>>:<:<>:>�>>:>:::: .50 ...... . .......G3.81.%:> ......:5:9796z:': <:ai<; .. ......:000085< Domestic Violence 1.000 0.75% 0.05% 0.00001 • SUBTOTAL 134.000 100.00% 6.22% 0.00133 PUBLIC WORKS • BUI in s..& u 28 0 5 00 ¢.00028;: Other N/A 0.00% 0,00% 0.00000 :.:;:.:.::<.;::.:;:;,;:>:::;:;:;:;;::;>r:2:;::;:::;;;:;;t;:•r,;:;;<;:;;::;!1;::::�::;:::2;::�:i£:i;::°.:i::i:.'<::::::: :.::r:::: Q;iC;::i:;i:i: ;:Meta.P.aa ...........:..........:.............................................:.........................................5�4d........:..:. ..::.10.#�%..; »><:>' >...0;2�%>? c:?:>>>>�s:`:..... .0 Sanitation 17.000 34,00% 0.79% 0.00017 SUBTOTAL 50.000 100.00% 2.32% 0.00050 HUMAN SERVICES .....................................:........._........._............. ...... ......... ... .... ,000... .......:..........62°1�:.<?<;::<:<::::s:...at99'x:.::;:>::<:>:::;:;::........ Economic Development 3.000 1.22% 0.14% 0.00003 . . � O.00tQfi ............... saclaESecV,e.� >::::»:«:>:>,<::::.:<:>::::::;:::>;:::.:.........:..>::>:::<;:::::::<:::>::;:<::<:;:::.>::::.:> I07 tOt� ::::.:::.:..43;4s%•................... 49?%. i�;<>::,'>'.>s�......... Health 69.650 28.28% 3.23% 0.00069 >A'ricultural.Exten o" ::<> zi>z:>'>?<>'• > :»::>: s:`.> ::>=">f:`::iz:>'i:>?>` '?>':':`: >:::9 r3 0 0010:' 8t Fi............................................ ......................................... ..75 .....i`>':>ii>'::;:;:;.3.96°6:;::::<:::::::�::::::::>:;Ot459is`z �::' i <:.......... 0 .. . Recreation& Parks 11.375 4.62% 0,53% 0.00011 :; ::j;o:i`.2;;:`.;;E;::.`;:%isi:::::isSi::::ii:is is i;:i% :=�i::iJ:;isisi:ri;�i:y:'rS:%:�.> ;?;';:<Siz;<?:::::::::::::::::�: � - :.:;•>::s:;;tt:;:.;;};::9:x,•%>L'.•:::;::;:i<;8::2:;c?:};i.`:;;:;?;:r.; ......:..:.::.........................:;::>'s:>:>: ::i!`:iiiiiiiii<•i�:`�::>::: : ::.............:.1.0.4¢0....:..:...... .::,.4,2496;: 4}�#� >:a:>::::>!:::<?: ;<:::?::;:0:0007:0:: CAT 10.515 4,27% 0.49% 0.00010 0.71%.; 80896' 0.0000 > Library 8.700 3.53% 0.40% 0.00009 SUBTOTAL 246.290 100.00% 11.44% 0.00244 NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES- FY 1993-94 ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET 28 (CONTINUED) 11993 ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION 1007581 FUNCTION PERMANENT FTE % OF % OF POSITIONS POSITIONS SUBTOTAL TOTAL PER CAPITA EDUCATION Orange County 726 000 4497% 33.72% 0.00721, Chapel Hill 888.410 55.03% 41.26% 0.00882 SUBTOTAL 1614.410 100.00% 74.97% 0.01602 FUND TOTAL 2153.295 100.00% 100.00% 0.02137 1 Source:FY 1993-94 Approved Budget,Orange County, N.C. • • • DRAFT 10/17/94 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES 29 Barrows asked about the access for Lot #6. Yuhasz responded that the building would be off Shelly's Trail. Barrows continued asking about further subdivision. Yuhasz responded that further subdivision could not occur because the remainder of the lot does not perc. MOTION: Barrows moved approval as recommended by the Planning Staff. Seconded by Reid. VOTE: Unanimous. ( 3 ) Wagon Farm Trails - Phases I-IV ( 39 Lots Cheeks Township) Presentation by Eddie Kirk. The property is located in Cheeks Township on the north side of High Rock Road (SR 1340) . The tract size is fifty-five (55) acres with thirty nine (39) lots proposed. Lot sizes are all approximately one acre in size except for one lot that is one and a half ( 1.5) acres and one lot that is 4 . 0 acres. The property is zoned R-1 and PW-II . It is designated Rural Residential and Protected Watershed in the Comprehensive Plan. Public roads are proposed to serve the subdivision with stubouts proposed to the north and east of the property. The entrance to the subdivision is on Poplar Drive which is a platted right-of-way that has never been constructed. All lots would receive access from the subdivision roads except possibly lot one which has minimal frontage on Poplar Drive. A 1992 traffic count on High Rock Road indicated 170 trips per day. The subdivision will be serve by individual wells and septic tanks. The Planning Board approved the Concept Plan with public roads constructed to State standards on November 15, 1993. Agency comments were received from Emergency Management, Environmental Health, Soil & Water Conservation, Recreation and Parks and NCDOT. Applicant comments have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. Kirk noted that the only change from the Concept Plan is a reduction of lots due to soils. 30 NCDOT has indicated that they will require turn- arounds at the end of Trail Drive and Wagon Farm Road. The Planning Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan for Wagon Farm Trails Phases I, II, III and IV subject to the conditions contained in the Resolution of Approval (copy an attachment to these minutes on pages ) . Barrows asked if Lots 1 & 2 could have a joint driveway so that lot 1 could access internally. Kirk responded that this plan begins with lot 5. Lots 1 and 2 were approved previously as part of a minor subdivision. MOTION: Reid moved approval as recommended by the Planning Staff. Seconded by Burklin. VOTE: Unanimous. (4) Hardscrabble Phase III Section I ( 14 Lots - Eno Township) Presentation by Eddie Kirk. The property is located along the Orange/Durham County line north of St. Mary's Road (SR 1002 ) in Eno Township. Access to the property is from Durham County through Berwick Place which is a road in Phase II of Hardscrabble. Approximately 29.73 acres in Orange County are proposed to be developed in this section with 12.09 acres in open space. Fourteen ( 14) lots are proposed with lots from 1.001 to 1.89 acres in size. The property is zoned Agricultural Residential and Protected Watershed. It is designated Agricultural Residential and Protected Watershed in the Comprehensive Plan. Public roads are proposed to serve the subdivision. A 150-foot stream buffer is proposed with the most of the buffer in open space. Lots will be served by community water and individual septic tanks. All lots will receive access from the internal subdivision roads. The preliminary plan for Phase II of Hardscrabble has been approved by the Durham Development Review Board and the Durham County Commissioners. The Planning Board approved the Concept Plan for Hardscrabble Phase III on August 15, 1994 with one condition: A suitable building site shall be