HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 10-06-2016 - 1 - Detention Center - Update on Project Schedule and Discussion of Potential Scope Expansion to Include Law Enforcement Center-Sheriff's Offices 1
ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: October 6, 2016
Action Agenda
Item No. 1
SUBJECT: Detention Center: Update on Project Schedule and Discussion of Potential
Scope Expansion to Include Law Enforcement Center/Sheriffs Offices
DEPARTMENT: Asset Management Services,
County Manager's Office,
Sheriff's Office
ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scope Options, Comparative Information Jeff Thompson, 919-245-2658
Travis Myren, 919-245-2308
Sheriff Charles Blackwood, 919-245-
2900
PURPOSE: To:
a) receive an update on the Detention Center project schedule; and
b) discuss and provide feedback to staff regarding a potential project scope expansion to
move the existing Sheriffs Office administrative offices from the lower level of the
courthouse to a co-located Law Enforcement Center on the new jail site. Court
security staff would maintain offices in the courthouse.
BACKGROUND: After authorizing the Manager to engage Moseley Architects as the designer
for the Detention Center project in the summer of 2015, initial project vision planning,
comprehensive stakeholder input sessions, the jail population profile, and projections for future
growth were conducted in the fall of 2015.
Subsequent schematic programming and planning activities were halted in the fall of 2015 in
order to process an amendment to the County's Ground Lease with the State of North Carolina
enabling the County to provide the built detention facility as collateral for standard project debt
financing. This amendment was successfully achieved through enabling legislation approved by
the State Legislature in the summer of 2016. The County is currently awaiting an executed
lease amendment from the State and will fully resume planning and design efforts once this fully
executed amendment is returned to the County.
2
Based upon the receipt of the executed Lease Agreement Amendment in October 2016, the
projected timeline for this project is as follows:
Activity Estimated Date Range
BOCC: Construction Manager at Risk October-November, 2016
Award
Schematic and Developmental Design Fall-Winter, 2016-2017
Preparations with Board and Stakeholder
Review/Feedback
BOCC: Approval of Final Design, Summer-Fall, 2017
Guaranteed Maximum Price
Permitting, State Review, Construction Period Fall 2017 — Summer 2019
(16-20 months)
Occupation Fall-Winter, 2019
Concurrent to this process, staff was requested to provide information to the Board regarding a
potential scope expansion of the project to include the co-location of a Law Enforcement
Center/Sheriff's Offices ("LEC") with the proposed Detention Center. Staff proposes that this
scope discussion include three options:
1) Standalone Detention Center only — This option represents the current
project scope as contained in the County's Capital Investment Plan
(CI P).
2) Detention Center with co-located LEC — This option would construct new
administrative office space on the Detention Center site and relocate the
Sheriffs administrative offices from the courthouse to the Detention
Center.
3) Detention Center with infrastructure for future co-located LEC — This
option would prepare the Detention Center site and install appropriate
utilities and infrastructure for a colocation of the Sheriff's administrative
offices on the Detention Center site at some point in the future.
If the Board of Commissioners authorizes further analysis of these options, staff recommends
five evaluation criteria to inform the decision making process. These factors include:
1) Cost of Construction
2) Staffing (Detention and LEC)
3) Operations and Maintenance (Detention and LEC)
4) Court operations support and security
5) "Backfill" options for potentially vacated spaces within the Justice Facility
A matrix of general information regarding the three development options as well as comparative
topics to be addressed in the Designer's analysis for each of the five decision factors is
attached. This will be presented in an effort to encourage Board discussion and feedback to
staff.
3
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The analysis of the additional options will require an amendment to the
Designer's current contract. The additional cost will not exceed $30,000. The project contains
sufficient funds to pay for the cost of the additional analysis. The Board has appropriated
$1,250,000 for engineering, site feasibility, and design work within the current and previous
years within the FY2016-21 CIP as well as approximately $20.5 million in additional project
funds in year 2 (FY2017-18) for construction and equipment for a standalone Detention Center.
Should the Board authorize the Manager to investigate one or more scope expansion scenarios,
corresponding financial impacts would be prepared and presented to the Board at a later date
as part of the ongoing design process.
SOCIAL JUSTICE IMPACT: The design, construction and operation of the Orange County
Detention Center meets the following social justice goal:
GOAL: CREATE A SAFE COMMUNITY
The reduction of risks from vehicle/traffic accidents, childhood and senior injuries, gang
activity, substance abuse and domestic violence.
RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends the Board:
a) receive an update on the Detention Center project schedule;
b) discuss and provide feedback to staff regarding a potential project scope expansion to
include co-located Law Enforcement Center facilities; and
c) should the Board reach a consensus on the project scope expansion, the Manager
will sign an amendment with Moseley Architects to analyze the implications of adding
a Law Enforcement Center to the current Detention Center project at a cost not to
exceed $30,000.
4
Options and General Information to Assist in Board Discussion
Detention Center with Detention Center
Detention Center Only built, co-located Law with LEC
Enforcement Center infrastructure for
(LEC) future co-location
General Facility Current detention facility Current LEC facility
Information information: information:
Original construction: Constructed/renovation:
1925 2009
Capacity: 139 Detainees Estimated Project Cost:
Square Footage: 40,227 $5MM
Area: 1.4 acres Square Footage:
20,000
Design Process
Currently
Authorized by yes no no
BOCC
Secure 144 bed facility Detention Center
with "core" infrastructure Detention Center with with prepared
Schematic for 250 bed maximum additional additional site and
Characteristics capacity; approximately estimated 12,000-18,000 infrastructure
49,500-52,200 square square feet of LEC connections for
feet of Detention Center space future LEC2
space; 6.8 acre site
Conceptual
Project "First Est. $17.6-$19.9 million2 tbd tbd
Cost"Estimates
1. Based upon initial conceptual cost estimate provided by Moseley Architects in the fall of 2015, coupled with
adequate contingency funds and a reasonable construction cost inflation factor projecting costs in the summer of
2016.
2. Infrastructure contemplated: fine graded and crowned building pad and associated site with appropriate
stormwater management installations and utility connection feeds ("stub-outs")from the constructed facility.
5
Operational Detention Center with Detention Center
Factors and Detention Center Only built, co-located Law with LEC
needed analysis Enforcement Center infrastructure for
(LEC) future co-location
-Construction Cost -Additional first cost and
life cycle impact
-Life cycle cost impacts
-Staffing -Staffing study anticipated -Potential staffing impacts
Fall 2016 comparing on both the spindle and
spindle vs. rear chase rear chase designs
design options. options.
-Operations and -Significant improvements -Potential Impacts on
Maintenance in programming, housing efficiencies for both
conditions, workplace operations and
safety and security, and maintenance activities.
maintenance of operations
equipment. -Potential sustainability
impacts associated with
-Additional improvements co-location.
anticipated in facilities
maintenance activities due
to new facility and modern
equipment.
-Court Operations -Court staff unchanged. -Potential Impacts of co-
Support and location on opportunity of
Security -Efficiency improvements Court staff to be housed in
with video-conferencing close proximity within a
technology within Court co-located facility.
facilities and detention
pods for Court officials and
detainees.
-Designed multi-purpose
room can serve as court
space.
-"Backfill" options for -Analysis of Potential
vacated LEC Uses3:
facilities -Child Support Services;
-Probation and Parole;
-Public Defender;
-District Attorney;
-Justice Resource Office
3. Existing offices, if re-located to vacated LEC spaces, would provide collaborative opportunities for re-purposing,
selling, or partnering with other stakeholders regarding the vacated facilities. Granular analysis of these uses
including cost and benefit comparatives would be provided as part of the LEC co-location study. Existing offices
are not considered stressed facilities according to the County Space Study Analysis.