Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda - 02-02-1987 - Special Mtg.
GA ukewir ''�rtL 1��trt��it�<t 7 *tats of N� I a naexttrtntcalf of ttic (�rctxtxzcr 6,,, 4i'el.I,'.r� SALISBURY STREET w ; . 1987 925 N. �`N E 1907 27 611 February 2 RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA H ARLAN E. 6PYLE5 S T A T E T R E A 5 U n E R MEMORANDUM TO: County Commissioners Chairmen FROM: Harlan E. Boyles, State Treasurer 1. SUBJECT: Financing Public School Construction plan announced by the Governor to ask the General Assembly mbl familiar t with the P Facilities n the Fund. 1 to authorize a statewide referendum on the question of issuing Assemb y bonds to establish a Public School plan because I As State Treasurer, I have fully and openly endorsed the p nrbeciuse believe that it gives us a once-in-a-lifetime "window of opportunity." Pp cognizant of I am cog that face us at the State level, and as Chairman of As an ex-officio ai h challenges the face Board of Education,a l the nda as Ch the financial challe g I am keenly aware I want to ask the Local Government Commission, y level . For these reasons, support the plan and to urge its adoption by the General Assembly• challenges that face us at the count you to supp plan by your personal attention e Doviheontatewide school You can support the p you have been facilities i o survey now underway and conducted by hope that y legislative Planning epi of the Department survey e because loft its timportance to future leg deeply involved in the survey action and also because your board of commissioners a esult ofl thehsurvey vital role to play in whatever action is to be taken does not purport to legislation to be proposed, as I understand it, provides r The leg I have written a se of interest expressed in alternatives, establish the only avenue available to the co school• construction costs, and alternative. B to finance public review of alternative ways r information• am enclosing a copy for you h to initiate communication with your legislators before convening Without question, no matter how good the You may wish the no matter Ashow goo idea,the 19wo session f yw in February. action by idea, it won't fly you may have We a s to t and how thhe e y plan the might work, rer inclris Local Government Commission, Teachers' and State Employe.' Retirement SY:tetn, Local Govern- „( irate Tr"eo"' Public k:nvloYe.rs- Social Security AueneY,Leeiaxtivc Retirement Fund, Eschents Fund, and Tao Review `C he Deparuncot &ctirement S.su m. rncnl:,1 N:mpluvec," Nosrd. tatr of ortft ( z rye'Jinn Prjmrtntri2t of ftir (` rett5urer 325 N. SALISBURY 57RF-El HARLAN E RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27611 S T A T E TREASURER Rev Public School aConstr Construction uction Costs We are pleased to review alternative ways to fund public school construction costs. We are also pleased with the interest and constructive concern expressed to you by county commissioners, legislators, and other officials involved in the funding process. First, of course, is our traditional method bofteachocou county Tiisuing bonds on its own faith and credit when approved procedure will continue t° b available commissnoners will change have the this authoityauthority tos contemplated. Each board o f county hea loar Punt decide whether to borrow on the open market or from the prop . In either event, local sales tax revenues are available for debt service. Second, local pay-as-you-go financing may be followed, using the local revenue stream created by the General Assembly's earmarking of ocal sales tax revenues for school construction and debtisservice. T isava method dilfty of financing does not require a rernm While pay-as-you-9° is a funds and continuing annual appropriations.be ilei ay-a -Y U-g length of desirable objective, its effectiveness may be mitigated a single the building time necessary to accumulate enough money with basic education bui and by the present need to catch-up and to comply facilities constr During the accumulation period, the impact of inflai on on co uctiioncstscould well equalorexceed the debt service requirements of a bond issue. Third, is a local combination of issuing bonds and pay-as-you-go, required on availability revenues and the that salesrta to as- ou- o the commissioners may have to sales tax revenues utaxes°forad2bt service. levy increased property Fourth, the as well assume proceedslofyState for cbond • of construction, or a combination of bonds and issues, appropriations for pay-as-you-go, pay-as-you-go. This approach would probably mean that the General Assembly by would have m to levy erstatewide, rease local option sales of county commissioners, this method of financing would be the lower borrowing costs associated with Local Govern- l lic Employees Social Security Agency, I.eciclati a Retirement Fund,Escheats Fund, and Tax Review The Pepatl eat of State TIenttlrer includes Local Gucernrnent Commission, reaehery' and State Employees' Retirement System, monL•d F:mplo)et'� Itx4irement. F$sL!'nl, Public Pearl Page 2 the issuance of the State's Triple A rated bonds. Each of us must judge whether relieving local government of all financial responsibility for public schools is in the best interest of public education. It is our belief that local responsibility, local authority, and local decision making, while carrying some disadvantage inherent in the unequal distribution of resources across the state, nevertheless yield greater strength and character to our system of public education. Fifth, the issuance of state bonds to provide grants to counties and thus supplement county spending for school construction has been routinely practiced by the General Assembly in 1949, 1953, 1963 and 1973. This method of financing was designed to help counties to catch-up with building needs not met by the county alone. The General Assembly, in 1983 and again in 1986, decided against continuing this method of financing and, in lieu thereof, created a local revenue stream by earmarking proceeds of newly authorized local-option sales taxes for school construction and debt service. Sixth, the State could adopt a pay-as-you-go method by direct appropriation to supplement county pay-as-you-go programs. This method of financing would give rise to the same problems described for local pay-as-you-go in the second method above. In addition, public school construction would be in direct competition with the infrastructure needs of state agencies and local government entities, including water and sewer, jails, prisons, mental hospitals, streets, solid and low-level wastes, parks and other capital needs; hardly appropriate for public education, the State's first priority. A review of the foregoing alternatives reveals that lowest costs are incurred by issuing State bonds and that local authority and local decision making are best assured by assigning local responsibility. We have not heretofore had a method of achieving these desirable dual objectives. Now, this is exactly what the proposed plan will do. County commissioners, legislators, and other officials involved in the funding of public school construction costs will be well served by this newest version of our traditional policy of participation between the General Assembly and the 100 boards of county commissioners. Harlan E. Boyles State Treasurer HEB/pro 1 ORANGE COUNTY COMAS SS10J_yERS i06 EAST MARGARET. HILLSBOROUGH, N. C- 27278 MOSES CAREY,JR. STEPHEN H.HALKIO IS JOHN HART W F-LL SHIRLEY E.MARSHALL DON WILLHOIT MEMORp,NDUM TO: Board; Ken FROM: . Shirl ..41/54141-- DATE: 3 March RE: MEETING WITH SUE BAKER; LINDSEY EFLAND On Monday 2 March, we met for some two hours: the arts: ect, from. the County; and discussion turned the s 2 p can exp dialogue andh (1) what the schools (2) management of a meaxtix�c�ful. budget the schools- umber (1) I made. clea afldp not speak Under n but I had some . impressions for the Board, good debate.. concerns. My concern was to foster g ou°ga pay-as-y a necessitp; pay-as-you-go only our the fund balance build uP had. drained dangerous on capital needs to a tang s immediate but had ereached our savings information gus surplus we but had get better cash .flowwiil not be and that t we will beginning again; that there . and that we will not�dailable major program money onsab'illty is to meet Second: the Commissioner's first resp and that we our capital responsibilities to the schools tiond this year we cannot rely on pay-as-you-go. Legislative active that we will have capital funding package st would ave. will sign. A the bond referendum probably r old not to design. A bond had pressing only school needs as the County needs as well. not act agreed that while the legislature may Third: We all ag of only one administrative pressures are building up and that unite this county, that the funding we per county, put in mind as t expect such action��inlltor not too h pp�uture; we must keep response to if keep our resp other decisions are made. Memorandum March 3, 1987 Page 2 we were going to pursue the equity issue and that . I was asking the Manager to prepare alternatives on be moving towards equity funding and that these alte fatiVesobe. included in the 1987-88 budget. We agreed, discussion, that the proposals should be prepared by the Manager and his staff without participation of the school administrations and that the school. boards should session hae adequate time have discuss the proposals in public meeting with us on the issue. Fifth: We needed to know more of how the schools were cooperating now in programming and we agreed that the most productive kinds of cooperation might be other than those listed in the Merger Report, i repeated that I was not sanguine that in the light of capital demands we could consider major program improvements, and that I was certain we would question cooperation when program improvements were requested. Under (2) ; First: I agreed to arrange that. the County deliver the soWelldasototth school w 29 May e all a start as even. Second: Chairs would request their Board members at the o1 June meetings to express particular' items to be explained discussed in joint meetings. Third: The Chairs will meet again on the morning of 3 June and work out dates for joint meetings and subjects to be discussed or even agendas for the meetings if such seems desirable. As each school board meets again on 15 June, should Board discussion be desired on any of the several issues we may have to discuss, the joint meetings will be held after the 15th. It is extremely important that we each keep as many days cleared in June for budget sessions as we possible can. Please begin to think, talk about and express to me, the process you wish to follow for budget deliberations. Thank you. ' SEM/bab File PA-vtiktio' DIST D CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO BOARD OF EDUCATION /14144e1 BUDGET CALENDAR Jan./Feb./Mar., 1987 Discussions on budget priorities Feb. 12 - 13, 1987 Preliminary discussion of budget Ipril 6, 1987 Board meeting Budget proposal and superintendent's message presented to Board April 13, 1987 Board meeting Public hearing and work session on budget April 27, 1987 Continued Board work session on budget (if needed) May 4, 1987 Budget adoption May 15, 1987 Budget must be submitted to County Commissioners by this date May 29, 1987 County budget will be delivered to Commissioners, Board of Education, Superintendents, press, etc., on this date June 1, 1987 Board meeting June 8, 1987 County Commissioners will hold public hearing on county budget June 15, 1987 Board meeting Adopt interim budget resolution (if needed) June 25, 1987 Budget adoption by County Commissioners (date dependent on legislative actions by this date) June/July, 1987 Board of Education adopt budget resolution (date dependent on County Commissioner's action) ti CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO BOARD OF EDUCATION 1987 SPRING CALENDAR OF EVENTS March 16 Board meeting (Lincoln Center) March 24 Systemwide Spelling Bee, 3:30 p.m., Lincoln Center 1 April 4 Public School Foundation fund-raising banquet. April 6 Board meeting (Ephesus Road) April 10 Leadership Team -- Dr. Paul George, middle schools April 13 Board meeting (Public Hearing on Budget) April 15 School Art Show Reception, 6:00 p.m.,Center } April 20 Holiday - Easter Monday April 21 - 24 Spring break April 27 Board meeting on budget (if necessary) May 4 Board meeting (Culbreth) (budget adoption) May 18 Board meeting May - date TBA Staff Recognition Banquet (probably last wk. in May) June 1 Board meeting June 7 CHHS Baccalaurate June 8 County Commissioners Budget Hearing June 11 CHHS graduation June 15 Board meeting June 17 Last day of school for students June 19 Last day for teachers (!:L� COUNTY of ORANGE Department of Purchasing and Central Services Pamela K.Jones,Director INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: DEPARTMENT HEADS FROM: PURCHASING & CENTRAL SERVICES DIRECTOR DATE: JANUARY, 1987 SUBJECT: ESTIMATED COSTS FOR FY 1987-88 BUDGET 1. TYPEWRITER MAINTENANCE ANNUAL TYPEWRITER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS WILL BE AS FOLLOWS: Carriage Typewriter $50 Electronic Typewriter (Other than Panasonic) $60 Element Typewriter $60 Facit Typewriter $65 Panasonic Typewriter $150 (KXE603) This expense should be budgeted in sub-account "16". 2. DUPLICATING Per copy cost will be: Xerox 1090, currently housed at Human Services .03 each Mita 31320, New Courthouse County Annex-Revere .03 each This expense should be budgeted in sub-account "24". NOTE: Those departments operating copy machines should likewise budget all associated costs in sub-account "24". All other printing done by outside vendors should be budgeted in sub-account "25". Information relevant to approximate monthly copy quantities is listed in Exhibit A. Human Services Budding • 300 West Tryon Street • Hillsborough.North Carolina 27278 Telephones: 919 732-8181•919 967-9251•919 688-7331 •919 227-2031 3. TELEPHONE The basic charge per County extension should be budgeted at $30 per month. The basic charge includes only those lines terminating at the County PBX in Hillsborough. Additional services, such as satellite offices with separate phone systems, all data lines and all long distance charges should be budgeted in addition to the $30 monthly extension charge. You may find information listed on Exhibit A helpful when budgeting telephones, sub-account "11". Departments anticipating changes in their phone configuration during '87-'88 should use the following cost estimates when budgeting: Purchase and installation of new phone - $175/each Relocation of existing phone - $80 Software changes - $52 per hour (Includes changing features on a given extension, changing ringing priorities within a department, etc. ) 4. MOTOR POOL CHARGEBACKS 4 Cylinder vehicles - $0.17 per mile 6 Cylinder vehicles - $0.19 per mile 8 Cylinder vehicles - $0.20 per mile Vans and pick-ups - $0.25 per mile Mini-busses - $0.45 per mile Busses (30 passenger or more) and specialized equipment such as ambulances, heavy trucks and tractors will be billed at actual cost of repairs and supplies. 5. POSTAGE Average monthly postage as processed through the Central Services postage equipment is listed by department on Exhibit A. These expenses should be budgeted in sub-account "12". 6. STANDARD OFFICE EQUIPMENT Cost estimates for more commonly purchased office equipment is attached as Exhibit B. The Purchasing Department would gladly assist in obtaining estimates for items not listed. NOTE: Equipment items costing in excess of $100 each and all furniture items with a useful life of more than one year should be budgeted in sub- account "70" or "74". -,,--v, Average Long Number Number Average Additional Distance of of $pmount Telephone Telephone Copies Copies of Charges Charges 4500 1090 Postage Per Month Per Month Per Month Per Month Per Month AGRICULTURE - 120 -- 32O0 ELECTIONS - 5 175 2000 102 CLERK OF COURT & SUPERIOR - 102 COMMISSION FOR WOMEN - 10 425 150 70 COMMISSIONERS 225 7 4700 125 150 HOUSING/C.D. 170 9 `"' 33' �- COURT COUNSELOR 10 17 - DATA PROCESSING 1700 19 - DEPT. ON AGING 555 19 40 4900 30 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 20 17 290 5000 5 EMS 4750 - 250 700 200 FINANCE - 67 2029 3898 198 GED _ HEALTH 1475 151 - 11550 300 LEGAL AID - 165 LIFE ENRICHMENT - 24 - 700 - 700- _ _ _- MANAGER 1 65 3950 13000 45 MENTAL HEALTH _ 80 PERSONNEL 1 71 1100 2000 55 PLANNING 39 107 7560 29200 250 PROBATION _ 3 - LIBRARY 22 40 - - 175 PUBLIC WORKS 31 32 - 5 PURCHASING 52 32 45 2300 40 RECREATION 135 103 320 6650 110 REG. OF DEEDS - 39 130 4675 275 SHERIFF 675 166 120 4000 200 SOCIAL SERVICES 1550 325 6060 SOIL & WATER 7 10 - _ SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 24 114 1200 460 85 TAX COLLECTOR - 15 _ 200 350 TAX SUPERVISOR - 42 950 145 VETERANS - 2 ' 3 WILLIE M. - 75 RSVP - 130 - LAND RECORDS - 12 _ - 30 Iy� a I6 STANDARD OFFICE EQUIPMENT PRICES EXHIBIT B Desk, executive Desk, secretarialdauble pedestal, wood, 60x34) Desk, interview, , (wood, 60x34) 480.00 Credenza, • (single-pedestal) 480.00 Chair, s (wood) secretarial 350.00 Chair, executive 360.00 Chair, side chair (upholstered) 130.00 160. 00 File cabinet 4-drawer letter size 180.00 4-drawer letter size w/lock 4-drawer legal size 160. 00 4-drawer legal size w/lock 100.00 5-drawer letter size 190.00 S-drawer letter size w 20. OD 5-drawer legal size /lock 215.00 5-drawer legal size w 225.00 2-drawer letter size 250. 00 /lank 2-drawer letter size w 270.00 2-drawer legal size /lock 100.00 2-drawer legal size w 120.00 115.00 /lock Typewriter, electronic 130.00 Typewriter, electric, correcting) Typewriter', electric g� element 800.00 Calculator, display carriage 885.00 Bookcase, wood,p36" and print, (desk top) Bookcase wood n width, 2-shelves 585.00 Bookcase, wood, 36"" width, 3-shelves 95.00 36 width, 4-shelves 150.00 CRT Terminal 175.00 CRT Terminal 200.00 Printer Word Processing Printer 500.00 CRT Terminal' Letter Quality 800.00 Table 30""Dx48""Wx27""g 800.00 CRT Terminal Table 30"Dx36""Wx27""H 1250.00 Printer Stand (Universal) 120.00 110.00 150.00 VISIONS FOR THE NINETIES The Strategic Plan for the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City School System What should the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City School System look like in the 1990's? To address the question, a broad-based strategic planning task force will be organized. The task force will be composed of teachers, parents, students, school administrators, school board members, and citizens representing a broad range of businesses and community leaders. The task force will be coordinated by the assistant superintendent for support services. The super- intendent will serve as an ex-officio member. The charge to the task force will be: 1. to conduct a status audit of the present program, in- cluding an assessment of strengths and weaknesses 2. to conduct a trend analysis, with particular attention on major economic, technological, political , demographic and other factors that are likely to have a significant impact on the school system 3. to develop a five-year plan of action Although the task force will oversee the overall strategic planning pro- cess and be responsible for the final document presented to the superintendent and Board of Education, it will be assisted in its role by action teams who will be given specific charges. For example, a planning team could be charged with conducting the trend analysis. The intent of having widespread and broad-based participation is to give more people ownership in the shared vision. Education is not an island unto itself. The education of youth is a community effort. The planning process will get underway this summer. The expectation is for a preliminary plan to be presented to the Board at its February 1988 conference. It will be the responsibility of the leadership team of the school system and Board of Education to convert strategic plans into operational plans. For example, based on the status audit and trend analysis, the task force might have as a strategy: "To respond to the needs of the non-traditional families and working parents." It would then become the responsibility of the staff to outline the action plans for addressing this strategy. Strategic planning should in no way be perceived as a criticism of the pre- sent school program. We have an excellent school system; however, a formal planning process allows us to prepare our students even better by depicting the trends that will affect their future and then responding to those. TO: THE BOARD FROM: SHIRL DATE: 5 JUNE 1987 RE: SCHOOL BUDGETS: DATES; DECISIONS; POLICIES. Moses and I met with Sue Baker and Lindsey Efland as planned on 3 June. We will meet with both boards both times; dates are set at places when they are because of convenience to School Board Chairs. Lindsey suggested District Courtroom as the best place to be both able to sit around the table together and to have room for the public to observe. 17 June 7:30 pm District Courtroom 24 June 7:30 pm Lincoln Center. Conversation was not limited to setting a calendar. Frustration is high particularly because of lack of consultation with school administrators both before and after the budget is prepared as well as with complete silence on the issues important to the schools and left out of the budget. Particular unhappiness because at the request of the Manager, Gerry and Dan found time to set up a meeting with him to discuss the equity issue and then he cancelled out. On the other hand he reported to me that they would not talk with him. CONTINUATION BUDGETS: Once again the manager and the schools do not agree on the figures -- a special disappointment. My own conversations with the school finance officers near the end of last year's process showed me we were much closer to working in consort and willing to work out the issues than ever before. Repeatedly this year I have communicated to the Manager that the three entities MUST reach agreement before the budget is presented leaving the three Boards to talk of long and short range policy. Before referring the matter back to the administrators -- a path that has led to a mire of disagreement, no progress, charges and counter charges at our workshops, I have asked Sue and Lindsey to provide for me the major differences and identify how they have come to occur. These you will receive and we will decide the next steps from that information. BUS DRIVER PROBLEMS. An immediate critical operating issue for the schools that has not been addressed by funding or comment in our budget. IDENTIFICATION OF MAJOR BUDGET COMMUNICATION PROBLEMS AND MOVEMENT TOWARDS REALISITIC MULTI-YEAR EXPECTATIONS FOR ALL BOARDS. [Here Moses and I spoke carefully for ourselves but expressed our feeling that the Board was generally in agreement with our feelings. ] 1. Each year the schools request in capital and program areas far more than the county, meaning the county citizens, are willing to fund from an annual ad valorem levy. 2. Our attempt to meet major capital needs completely on a pay-as-we-go basis has been a large contributor to our decreasing fund balance. No help the legislature might give can make it possible for us to provide the capital needs identified by the schools. A well-thought-out capital program funded where appropriate by bonds is the immediate initial step needed to provide available annual appropriation monies. 3. The 8% of budget fund balance in actual dollars needed for a continued good bond rating and thus low interest rate grows with increases in the annual budgets. [The 13.2% increase proposed for the 1987/88 budget adds $240,000 to the sum needed to provide 8%. ] 4. The primary obligation of the Commissioners is to fund capital needs; while we understand the schools not wanting to stand still on programs, agreement on and funding for current and long-range capital needs must be in place before we can address other requests: -- we must not only agree, for instance, on the need for a $750,000 annual capital current appropriation, but we must also agree on what needs are covered in that appropriation; roofs, for example, were included in the capital needs task force recommendation of that figure; -- once capital funding is in place, it should be possible to agree on a reasonable annual expansion program increment from which School Boards and County Management would work in preparing their budgets. MOVING TOWARDS EQUITY FUNDING. The Commissioners are concerned seriously about and determined to reverse the increasing disparity in funding for the two systems and to move, as quickly as reasonably possible, towards parity; parity in no way limits the decision-making function of School Board members once the allocation is made. Approving the Chapel Hill-Carrboro employee supplement expansion request would move us in the direct opposite direction from equity. Because citizens throughout the county are more concerned about teacher's salaries than any other school or county issue and often express their willingness to pay more taxes for this purpose, exploring employee salaries, bonuses, supplements and other perks very well may be the place to start in moving towards equity. Again, it is disappointing that the current county budget did not seize the opportunity presented by the city schools request and make a specific proposal instead of remaining silent on this top priority request. We discussed favorably the merit of a short term limited task force to include administrators, elected officials, and school employees being convened to brainstorm and provide guidance that could lead to a specific county budget proposal in 1988/89. Thank you. cc: Sue Baker Lindsey Efland Manager Press in 12 June packets S e17 ffoiHe t4,/r# Oi IA16‘ CegeofPf 5C17600,1 Sr/40 4,ra MAY 18, 1987 On Monday, June 8, the Orange County Commissioners will hold a public hearing on the 1987-88 budget at the courthouse. The Orange County Board of Education is asking for many important items for our schools, including: * Increase in pay for pus drivers. This may attract the responsible adults needed to transport our children. * Funding for an aide for the 4th and 5th arade teachers at the elementary schools. * Increase in the local teacher supplement. This helps to attract and keep good teachers in Orange County. Your children need the best teachers money can buy! * Initiating a supplement for classified personnel , including classroom aides, maintainance and food service staff . * Partial funding of Magical Thoughts at C.W. Stanford Junior High School . The County Commissioners need to hear from the parents of Orange County. The School Board needs your participation. Please plan to attend. If you cannot attend, but would like the Commissioners to hear your support, we can read a statement from you. Please put your comments on this sheet, with your name and send this back to your child's teacher. We will read your comments at the Hearing. Or, write or call a county commissioner with your support . PLEASE PLAN T9 ATTEND: MONDAY. JUNE 8. ORAJGJ COUNTY COURTHOUSE THANK YOU, ORANGE FEDERATION OF TEACHERS Memorandum • ..r tA P4 r� FROM: DATE: 1�L / Ap f l o, Chapel Hill,N.C.27514 Telephone 967-6581 118 aSouth Churton Street '- Hillsborough,N.C.27278 • i Telephone 732-5325 Ourbant itiOL"riinn licrAltr Criticisms Of Budget Proposal district,the Chapel Hill-Carrboro ager's budget came out May 29 on a fig- Thompson said it is not.his job to 1 system gets in excess of$3 mil- ure needed to maintain programs at make political decisions about equitable ,, year more than the Orange their current level.The county schools funding of the two school systems,or bo- y school system.But a task force asked for $86,399 more than the nuses and pay supplements. ing merger of the two systems $4,36L122 offered by the manager.The „Those are political decisions,"he mended last year that the systems city schools asked for$92,642 more than said."The board has a role in this.This ual amounts of money. the$4,618,265 offered. is the time for them to assume that Marshall also said Thompson's Thompson said in an interview Tues- role" ar capital plan,which came out a day that he agreed with Ms.Marshall in . after the budget,did not include principle,but the reality of the situation Thompson said he had tried and failed is funding recommendations for was a different matter. .• to get the two school staffs together to 'Ilion in school projects. "Ideally that would be the case," discuss equal funding,support staffs, •ht now we don't have all the big Thompson said of the school staff reach- pay supplements as well as sharing ac- issues together,"she said."We ing agreement on program funding cess to their courses. o move toward parity." ahead of time."The fact is,however,the "All effort to get the ... staffs to. said that the two school systems' budget process is a competitive one. gether was unsuccessful." As for increased supplemental pay Some things take more time than Thompson said the school-funding -s far experienced employees"is a others." issue is a complex one."It can't be done :ood issue over which to move to- Thompson said the difference in the hurriedly,in any kind of cursory man- arity." continuation budgets stems from the ner,"he said."They are not questions Marshall also said she had hoped schools expecting major increases in that can be easily answered.They are o school staffs and the county electricity bills while the county expects not questions that can be wholly an- ould have agreed before the man- decreases. swered by a manager." Improvements Plan dT .,q 5 Totals $50.5 Million" � , Ni ' k ects concerns possible action by Y > , 3 By MIKE MCQUEEN the General Assembly.At least �4 ? ' ,, Herald Hillsborough bureau six different bills currently is as under consideration could be , �, used as grant or loan funding for .'1.Px , a , HILLSBOROUGH—Orange jail construction, water and � a County Manager Ken Thompson sewer or school construction :,. c has compiled$50.5 million in pro- projects. < • posed capital improvements As a result,Thompson sug- ,0,- -` needed by 1992,including$4 mil- gested funding$2.9 million in ' &'" lion to acquire land for a water first-year projects.for the 1987-88 .. reservoir and_$6 million for fu- budget year beginning July 1. ----,--1----..fu,s tune parkland. Appropriations for subsequent years would be delayed until the The majority of the money General Assembly acts on the would be spent on the county's .t F various bills. s 5, two school systems—$34 million. +Legislative proposals,if ap- proved,County schools would re provide much ceive$10•2 million while Chapel named ass stance in regard to fi- Hill-Carrboro would receive nancing the Capital$20,3 million.The,money is ear Improve- ments Plan,"Thompson said. ,< m , ,s marked ostly or extensive p ° However,those proposals along renovations of the systems' with the county's current re- Sc hool buildings. r,k sources will not finance all the + j z z, To pay for most of the im- needs listed in the plan.A voter r .,� ? provements, Thompson sug- approved bond issue is the an- 3 s .. gested a number of options,in- swer in funding the major needs t •, ,, eluding up to a $44.5 million contained in the plan." ,, bond issue,to be repaid over 20 Besides the reservoir and park years by using a combination of land acquisition and the school , 4;. local sales tax revenue and prop- renovations,major projects in- -—--- , -, - ''. . erty tax increases.Some small. elude a new$1.2 million county t, projects are not eligible for bond office in Chapel.Hill,a$515,000 , funding,and$4.1 million already expansion of the Tax and is listed in the current school Records Building in Hillsbor- capitalplan. ough and $340,000 for a The manager's five-year capi- Livestock/Horticulture Market tal improvements plan summa- in northern Orange County. rites studies of the spaces needs Thompson said work on the ' for the schools and county ad- market should proceed only after minstration, assurances can be obtained that a - The board of commissioners livestock market association can 5 d u will use the improvements plan put up the$200,000 in annual op- in its 1987-88 budget discussions. erating costs. Thompson said an improvements Other projects include -. ,. plan should be approved by the $272,000 for adding eight cells ,a s commissioners and updated an- and expanding the county jail, " nually.The commissioners would $350,000 for expanding the ani- p select specific funding alterna- mal shelter,$220,000 for anew fives. public works building and P `' One major question mark in $250,000 for expanding the 911 the funding of the capital proj- Emergency Medical Service. C 412 WOsl Franklin Street 9 %Jra--nge,,C ount . . es Chapel Hill,N.C.27514 Wednesday,,June 10.1987 Telephone 967-8581 118 South Churton Street Hillsborough,N.C.27278 0 Comicsl2 ❑Obituarles74 Classified/5 Telephone 732-5325 )h4414 niff 't AiD Thompson Respo- Cri nds' To . ■ mnmmmw� f Budget P tc! Herald sms MIKE aWcQUEEN equalize ize funding of thettwo s hoot sys- school district,the Chapel Hitl Carr. rO P o s a l He Chapel Hilt bureau a ro ager's budget came out May 29 art a fill-terns. ystem gets in excess of$3 mil- ure needed to maintain Programa at make o itical It about Thompson meanwhile,said in an in Corny schoolsystem Butta the askrforee -asked orent level.The coon Thompson said it fs not his job to CHAPEL HILL—prangs Count teh- that equal funding is difficult to studying merger of the two systems ttyy 1 equitable County achieve and is an issue that the commis- recommended last year that the systems city schools asked for$92,842 o schoala fundl g of the two school systems,or bo- Manager Ken Thompson has responded sinners,not the count mono er,should an the ausesand in a private,five page memo to criticism $4,361,122 offered by the manager• The Pay supplements of his$30.9 million budget proposal by decide. . y g get equal amonts of money, "Those are political decisions,"he Shirley Marshall, chairman of the Ms.Marshall said the memo she sent .five-yeaaracapital plan,which came out a day k�hatlhe agrfeed with Ms. yI �than r Orange County commissioners. public Frida She week after the budget did not include Is t ..The board has a out would be made P Thompson said in an interview is the time for them to assume that Toes- role in this.This declined to comment Tuesday on specific fundin regomnnendatt`onsfnr w incipl ,but t e reality arshaIl in role.,, The memo,obtained through Commis- Thampson's response,Saying, g principle,bu#the reality of the situation in sinner Don WJllhoit,was sent to the really interested o getting into a t t for $3 Right now we don't e all khe big Thompson said of Thompson said he had tried and failed commissioners as Thompson's reply to tat with the press and the manager "Ideally that wool^d be the case," to get the two school staffs together to to nine points Ms.Marshall made in an g poky issues together,' she said."We . ing agreement on ragroam fundin discuss equal funding, p p discuss about the funding 'n She said that thrd w school systems' budget process is p toff reach- g,support staffs, article published in the Chapel Hilt ahead of time."The fact is,however,the pay supplements as well as sharing ac- NervsPoPer last week, issues and what she sees as the man- requests for increased supplemental a e cess to their courses. It responds to three paints Ms. agMsMarshalt said Thompson s budget very a competitive one. All effort to get the..,staffs to- cyguidance. bonuses for experienced employees"is a others." take more time than gether was undo Marshall made in a memo she wrote to g ry good issue over whip.to move to Thompson said the difference in the unsuccessful the commissioners,the city and county pF ns ort how the fundin a of tthe two was.Marshall also said she had hoped schools expecting Thompson said the It can't be done gg p '�� continuation budgets stems from the issue is a complex one."It can't be Bane school boards and Thompson. school systems could be made a ual. hurriedly,in an Ms.Marshall has taken Thompson to Because of a special tax fo 4 he ekt the two school staffs and the county schools expec while the coon ner'�,he said. ",� kind of cursory man- g e th or increases is that can be easily answered They Library staff would have agreed before the man- decreases. q They are ty expects not uestions that can be wholly an, Set swered by a manager•" Ta Leo I p��o�� _ pen m � Ian a Am n August Totals $5005. MIKE NlcOItEE ects concerns possible arrin..ti,. 0410' 11 :23: 12 22 MA't 1c'97 PAGE 1 41 POSNUM. , . . . GR ST BUD% REV. . LEA T E.EMP CUR.:SALARY REQ.SALARY . . . 13,022.00 0410-1 65 6B 1u0 11/1 ' 11114/83 $22, 104.00 $22., 104.00 0410-2 61 3C 100 07/01 07/01/25 $13,430.00 116,452.00 04.10--2 91 3D 100 $5,947.00 $5,94700 0410-4 C;1 38 100 15,947.00 $5,947.00 041-0-.5 51. :3 y 100 X47 1. c �, .uii $5,947.00 0410-6 91 2B 100 $5,947.00 $5,947.00 0 041 0-7 51 :3B 100 $5,947.00 $5,947.0 0...._,... _.. _.. $65,269.00 171 , 313.00 ,, 7.0 4av 0 `' • 0 • _ 1987-e,8 ;iIItCET Ar_•�_�}f_iN} DETAIL FOR DEPARTMENT ORANGE COUNTY p • a . • a a • o n n F- J D DEPT OB DESCRIPTION. . . . . . . . � . . . . . . a 1.734 o 410 01 COUNTY COMM - BOARD 10 .... 410 02 COUNTY COMM IMM - r'ER.'-.r rNNEL 10 410 03 COUNTY COMM - TEMP PERSON INEL 0 . (., 10 410 04 COUNTY } OMM � PROF R.WE S 4735 1.0 410 o5 COUNTY COMM - =�►J}- =;Erg Z-37 10 4.1 ii 06 COUNTY COMM MED 1ci 4.10 07 r,:rriJPiTY collet - .RETIREMENT ---------- 68r834 l 111787 j�� 4it 1 �... ijOUNTY r_:CIMM - TF:AV.EL.r::TRFt,IN . 1 e. s c l. . i;rrriJNTY COMM - TELEPHONE 1 410 11 11475 1.0 410 12 COUNT COMM - POSTACE. . 135 1 Ci 410 14 COUNTY CQMM - M`rTr��t POOL 329 L �rLlhlTY COMM REPAIR, � MAINT 10 .. 410 16: .. 4- . 2 645 10 410 Z'4 COUNTY COMM - DUPLICATING 1 $47 1 6 41.0 .Z r r rI JNT Y C 0 M M - PRINTING 3,r 180 �. cr Q Z6 �ti�IyTY Cr 1iM A tVEEtT`JI - 40 Y 856 10 410 27 COUNTY COMM - DUES M:: SiJDS �ylr� ., DEPT SUPPLIES 10 410 32 COUNTY, COMM 10 14 33 COUNTY COMM - r ri F F I r E 1 r SUPPLIES ? Ct4 SUPPLIES 84 1tr 410 34 COUNTY COMM - OTHER 1C} . . i0 44 %`�iJNTY . COMM - CONTRACT PERSONNEL . u 4.1 CO[11TY COMM - TA'3K FORCE r��I t� r.8 + P UL t FORM 3A TRAVEL, TRAINIM Aim PR{ESS1W& DEVELOPMENT ,FUND DEPARTMENT PROGRAM/DIVISION ACCOUNT CODE 10-410-10 General Board of Commissioners NAME, LOCATION AND DATE TYPE & COST REGISTRATION ROOM OF CONFERENCE, OF TUITION, AND DEPT MANAGER SCHOOL OR TRAINING ACHIEVEMENT .'TRANSPORT :BOOKS MEALS REQUEST RECOM TITLE OF EMPLOYEE Bd. of Commissioners Information NACO Annual Conf.-Indianapolis Air 1,575 $ 3,575 July.11-15, 1987 $ 1,125 875 NACO Legislative Conference Combinati March, Washington, D.C. $ 1,025 $ 875 925 2,825 NCACC Annual Conference Private C r August in North Carolina 410 625 1,000. 2,035 NCACC Conference Private C r December in North Carolina 210 625 320 1,155 Travel for Board Meetings, Co ferences an various me tings 2,400 Clerk's office Travel for Board Meetings, c ferences an various me tings 31 NACO Legislative Conference 175 190 36 March, Washington, D.C. NCACC-Wrightsville in April 65 220 270 . 555 NCACC Annual Conference August, Unknown 125 245 37 , =j i DUE DATE: MRCH 28, 1986 STRATEGY PAGE 2 DEPARTMENT Board of Commissioners' Office PROGRAM In accordance with the General Statutes ACCOUNT CODE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Work involves responsibility for research, analysis, and preparation of written reports, office management, and liaison with numerous elected and governmental bodies. Work is performed under the general supervision of the Chair of the County Commissioners and requires independence, . initiative, sound judgment and tact. CONTINUATION OBJECTIVES: 1 . Complete the I E R Guide. 2. Codify and update the County Ordinances. 3. Prepare a policy manual to encompass all those policies made by the Board. 4. To complete the indexing of the minutes 5. Assist the Chair and the members of the Board of Commissioners in any way I can. a. Dealing with the public, providing information, filtering requests, inquiries and comments, handling complaints and briefing the Boars! Members as necessary. b. Liaison between the Board Members and other citizens, government officials, private groups, etc. as necessary. c. Handling all administrative work involved in the routine operation of the Commissioners' Office and all administrative work resulting from the Board's decisions, including all correspondence as requested by the Board Members. Research and obtain information as requested, from routine - 'daily -inquiries .to, complex research projects and assisting the Board in whatever ways they request. d. Handing confidential matters for the Chair and the Board Members and do many things the members cannot do because of time limitations. DUE DATE. FEBRUARY 23, 1987 DEPARTMENT 117-88 BUDGET STRATEGY Board of Commissioners' ffFCe DEPARTMENT MISSION/FUNCTION STATEMENT Performs and is legally responsible for the mandated f and 153A-111, unctions stipulated Performs as administrative su 'n GS 153A-12, GS 153A-76 requested, working Fort to the Chair and members of Commissioners, g to assist and respond to their d the Board . requirements as of Commissioners as the Board of County ATTACH AN ORGANIZATION CHART OF YOUR DEPARTMENT BOARD OF. COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CLERK DEPUTY CLERK DUE DATE; FEBRUARY 23, 1987 r • d _H r Rfffff ..r _ - 711 { } f I �u r7 I- j T rn F7 rt E 17 V 2 777 it j UP, fit ll HC T 7 f-,N 2 73�' 2 same., 6 fl 0 r, fit J l'T'f 3.i t i l q r, s:1 1,600 1,8oO ... ... . + 200 7 777 oq 600 ",Same to 64 7 C r�� 12 12 ....... .... ... . . . Is 14 7 ... t238 1 1238 15 "me 16 j 17 17 C it 0 o i u lh!l Y re 1 ... ..... . 21 v 22 2.,400 Wo 21 —————————— 4 900 2 2 4 j C lqVJ I 1"r r i t; 20 f) 220 4 6 N, ..... . .... 100. . . 31 t, 21 00 300 2 411) Ft 10T T, same 5 700 34 48 252 4 j j 7 2,000 same 4 same 41 0 . ...... . . 51 % j f, 2 000 4 4 . .... . .. e 1580: 8 4 ———------- t,Ions NOT 153,3 -4 No appropr i a areL Ppade, n this budget annual +L5 56 t or the report or. f or w,11 be appropriated from the Manager's Office. sa 2 73 y FY, jr --OF, E PA,Pl. 4 X37 RED;JCT T C same 7 01 00 '800 L . ...... + 200 60- same lu JIMPI 1,11:11 1 P,1 t 2 2 ........ ..... ..... 13 7 jt23 ...... r238 same IS' ,e lfr N,)Y r.,f �3. 19 t 19 1 21 5 C, �qo 21 400 64 . . . 2 ....... 0 3 Pub 6 00 J A I ry 20 �rQQ + 3O 33 Ij tY„'t1€��t . ...... L2.,�90 4 1 same 7r 41 +2 F, I Ij- y -k Ij 2,000 2,000 "me Same V j . .. ..... ... . `2,000 same s 98f7 51 HOiE No,b0piopr.!at S are d 2 m' e an Ibis budget for the annual repo these 930 + 515 Will be appropriated from the Man 4 ager's Office. fi 71 FORM A�p�}11t�}�ipTr try , T INTINE APPROPRIAT101 REOUEJ l AGE or FUND DEPARTMENT ROGRAM/DIVISION A COUNT CODE ' General . Board of -Commissioners' -Office 10-410-70 "ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION DEPT. MANAGER CODE OF REQUEST RECOM. ITEM JUSTIFICATION 10-410 77 2 - 2 shelf book cases Expansion-of-.office for the Commissioners $ 300_ .00 and increase in activities 10-410-71 1 table " $ 145.00 10-410-7 3 - 2 drawer file cabinets " . $ 300,00 10-410-7 1 electric typewriter "' $ 800.00 10-410-7 1 coat rack " $ 35,00 DUE DATE: MARCH 31, 1987 FORM X FUBSIONALAFFILIATIGS - DUES 90 SMSCRIPTIgIs PAGE OF FUND DEPARTMENT. PROGRAM/DIVISION ACGOUNT CODE General Board of Commissioners' Office 10-410-27 DEPT. MANAGER POSITION TITLE ORGANIZATION OR PUBLICATION REQUEST RECOM. NCACC NACo $ 7,571.00 $ 1,086.00 Triangle J COG (last years figure) $31,625.00 NCA of County Clerks $ 35.00 Capital Health Systems Agency $ 2,473.00 League of- Women Voters $ 150.00 Institute of Government (s.ame as last year) $ 2,312,00 North Central Piedmont R & D $ 250.00 National Assoc. of County Clerks $ 50.00 Various Publications from the IOG $ 200.00 - Other Publications $ 400.00 All final figures have not yet been determined. This amount should cover all increases $ 2,100.00 DU'_ T✓,TE: MARC-11 31 1987 FORM 7-A RAVE�, F W- 1 WNT , PAGE Or FUND DEPARTMENT ROGRAM/DIVISION CIOUNT CODE TITLE NAME, LOCATION AND DATE FORM Or TYPE COST REGISTRATION, ROOM OF OF CONFERENCE, ACHIVVEMEN or TUITION, AND DEPT. MANAGER EMPLOYEE SCHOOL OR TRAINING EXPECTED TRANSPORT 130OKS MEALS REQUEST RECOM. Board of Commissio ers NACo Annual Conf.-Callf 7/88 nformation Air- 2100 $1,000 $ 1,575 $ 4,675 NACo Legis.Conf.-D.C. 3/88 Comb. 225 $1,000 887 2, 112 NCACC Annual Conf.-8/87 Car 125 625 575 1 ,325 NCACC Conf. 12/87 Car 125 625 575 1,325 Private/Public Partnership - /88 (packag deal) 1,975 Various travel for Board memb rs 2,400 (meetings, conferences, wor shops, legislative updates, etc.) Clerk's Office Travel - meetings, etc. $ 315 NACo Legislative Conf. 200 135 335 NA County Clerks' Conf. (2) Car 65 220 270 555 Various workshops, schools, Itc. 470 =Mz===Z9= Z�=J P'U� DATE: MARCH 31, 1937 e i , FORM 7B U OR PML USE' FUND DEPARTMENT PROGRAM/DIVISIOta ODE T C General Board of Commissioners' Office ACCOUNT NUMBER COST DEPT, MANAGER TRIPS REQUESTED ON FORM 7A USING COUNTY-OWNED VEHICLES MYLES MILE REQUEST RECOM. Various trips 300.00 NORMAL DEPARTMENTAL USE OF MOTOR POOL DLL DAL, Af►C� 31 1987 . ___, TRIANGLE J COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS i .i,.ik\J\,\Joic-,4 FL; P.Q. BOX 12276 • RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27709 -OLD TO SHIPPED TO -ordan Parker, Finance Officer :)range County Courthouse - Orange County iillsborough, N.C. 27278 , 'E DATE SHIPPED SHIPPED VIA YOUR ORDER NO, F.O.B. TERMS INVOICE Na -/ 3/87 207 'I jTY DESCRIPTION PRICE AMOUNT • 1988 Local Assessment. $32159 a, 3 g., 15- :, 9 i MO Ye. -71---6,--,c,_. f4e/e iii7L d),i.a./, 'N72 The Drawing Board,Dallas,Texas 7526e-0429 312-1js._` p,Ina,1882 0 . ,y , 1®? ' 4,..-/ ✓ Aill e, r r - fit,. „2 hit a ? - , ,,,_ -v a_f -t- - ~- • &-&-Ge-e-ezre l - �/p .40,72f7 .. -- /© 1 7r I.? do `7y',.00 . . . if/levers X g Gieeks X j?= a o 761. 00 /r ems X l4 AD. o O ot( adeks ,t' ler . .. A.6.3 07..SO to - 0.-1;=-3 ../ a, c1 0 0, © o 42:3-° s I :-. - Aq s 7 9. 0 v 7 1-0.44 7. 6 g l aed/e4dg.totewel I .. , �,- - ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 108 EAST MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGH, N. C. 27278 MOSES CARET.JR. STEPHEN H.HALKIOTIS JOHN HARTWELL SHIRLEY E.MARSHALL DON WILLHOIT MEMORANDUM TO: Shirl FROM: Beverly DATE: July 13, 1987 RE: BUDGET FOR 1987-88 You requested that I review my budget to determine if I could cut in any of the areas listed. After careful review, I would like to offer the following recommendations. Acct. 10-410-02 (Personnel) ($2,249) Acct. 10-410-24 (Duplicating) ($ 300) Acct. 10-410-10 (Travel) ($ 195) This would total $2,744•which would mean no increase in the budget request from last year. We had discussed the personnel reorganization in the office in which Sylvia will work three or sometimes four days per week with a coop student working 20-25 hours per week. This is the Cause for the adjustment in personnel. I feel that with the day-to-day., change in activities and , happenings in the office that I need this flexibility. The duplicating machine on this floor will be replaced as soon as the budget is approved with one that will better serve the offices and more adequately take care of the needs of the different departments using the machine. The cost per copy will drop from six cents to four cents. This coupled with the goal of less paperwork has enabled me to make an adjustment in this line item. The travel account will have a credit from the NACo conference which will mean an excess in that account. I'm not sure of the amount at this time. I don't feel at this time that I can make any further cuts in the budget for this office. However, I would like to assure you that I will monitor the budget very closely for further savings to the County. Thank you. 1 flea ' 80 of L'oitizr. M ��ANS LiPR° AAA/4.1A-1----. 4QWfMayor4ia .� Ii Frank H. Sheffield, Jr. rou k HILLSBOROUGH, /Agatha Johnson Commissioners NORTH CAROLINA 27278 Myron L. Martin Supt. Water Works Horace H. Johnson James Pendergraph Allen A. Lloyd Street Supt. Remus J. Smith L.D. Wagoner Rachel H. Stevens '' Chief of Police ^.0 Arnold W. Hamlett Fire Chief t ©J� John Forrest April 3, 1987 Orange County Board of Commissioners 106 East Margaret Lane Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 Dear Commissioners: I have been told that special legislation is being considered to enable Orange County to levy a transfer tax on the conveyance of real estate. I am not familiar with the details of how this legislation might be worded. How much revenue this tax would produce for the Town of Hillsborough is not yet clear. The pace of property development in and around Hillsborough, involving in most instances transfers of property ownerships, is a sign of prosperity but also a trend which will be placing a consider- able financial burden on Hillsborough for capital improvements such as thoroughfares, sewers and parks. The money to accomplish these improve- ments is not now in sight. The question of a transfer tax has not been discussed by our town board. What I can say now is that the town will need money to accomo- date the community growth. When all aspects of the transfer tax take shape, this may prove to be a helpful and equitable way to pay some of the cost of growth. I am sure that the Town Board would need the transfer tax and its effect on the Town of more about taking any position on this legislation. $ before Sincerely, 0,01, '=:=VI'&de Frank H. Sheffield, Jr. Mayor FHS/jc • TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL 3)6 NORTH COLUMBIA STREET DISTRIBUTED CHAPEL HILL NORTFI CAROLINA 27514 OrrlcE or ma MAYOR March 25, 1987 TELEPHONE(919)968-2714 Mrs. Shirley Marshall , Chair Orange County Board of Commissioners 106 Margaret Lane Chapel Hill, NC 27514 Dear Shirley: On Monday, March 23rd, 1987, the resolution. We are again requesting nthat nthe BoardeoftCountclComd Commiss- ioners continue to support both our Parks and Recreation program our Library services by County Commiss_ programs. Y continued assistance in the funding of both d The Council is appreciative for the County's financial support in past years. It allows us to provide further service to Co resi- dents and we respectfully request that the County's funding will reflect the ratio of County residents' County resi- programs available to them. participation in all of the A formal presentation will be forthcoming "and time.when a hearing is scheduled. budget ofgadd Ong ed. to n , 410 la lace ' u n � imbers I le of C i1 *41 Town Manager - -6, 4 1 -i/ /1') , c ` (writ] ,be?„.v June 1, 1987 Orange County Commissioners 106 East Margaret Lane Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 Dear Commissioners: I am writing to express my pleasure with the County Manager's support of the Youth Services Needs Task Force's recommendation of CBA funding. The $68,028.00 in County matching funds will go a long way in the support of Shaeffer House. I am equally pleased by the Manager's support of Project Attend, Adolescent Day Treatment Education Program, the Dispute Settlement Center and the Phillips/Culbreth Project. Each of these programs is a most invaluable resource, meeting the needs of Orange County youth. I would also like to commend Albert Kitrell, Beverly Blythe, Stephanie Snipes and Donna Wagner for their help and cooperation to me personally. They made my work as Task Force Chair much easier. Thank you for your continuing interest and support of the Task Force's mission and of Orange County's most valuable resource: its children. Sincerely, /71 J. M. Deloatch, Jr. Chair, Youth Services Needs Task Force JMD:acb st Di;�r,i4 7' 64 V/1"7 ORANGE COUNTY DEPARTMENT ON AGING y_-vim Southern Orange Senior Center 410 Caldwell Street Extension m.+•"■ e,r Northern Orange Senior Center Chapel Hill,N.C.27514 y is.. •' 300 West Tryon Street (919)968-4478 Hillsborough,N.C. 27278 w�" ''`` 732-9361 —Hillsborough C1`' J Jerry M.Passmore 967-9251 —Chapel Hill Director '�a,� a.t�`�•` 688-7333 —Durham 227-2032—Mebane To: Orange County Commissioners From: Orange County Senior Citizens Board Mr. Arthur Whitted, Vice Chair Rev. Richard Hildebrandt Date: June 24, 1987 Subject: Reconsideration of Department on Aging Budget Request Items 87-88 The Orang y Department on Agin "s propose d 19888 Budget and Service Pln prepared by Departmet staff, review and--mod- ified and ppry the Senior Citizens Board on April 1987.The County MangOffice has reviewed t and has suppoed most requests. Thee been a good working elationship witthe County Manager an we thim for it. Howevertwo items, whiwere not approved, re crl to the operation o the DepartmentThey are as ows: r 1- Aging - Administration Personnel (1067002 tionist-Secretary for the Hillsborough Office. fT e time tment 111 has depended on the federal Title V S he ogramtmort \ clerical support anion worker program for �� pp port for the past seven years. The Department now \ has only one part time Senior Worker to cover the office. The Manager is proposing funds to cover the balance of the day ($4500 under Senior Center - 1067103) but this is not sufficient. We feel this busy department office requires and deserves a full time secretary like other Departments. 2. Aging-Transportation (10-674) . There is a need to increase medical transportation service from the various townships to Chapel Hill-Carrboro, to Hillsborough and even Durham, but the Department lacks funds. These are people who cannot always ride the existing buses, due to poor health, time of appointment, or location (DoA does not go out of County at this time) . The re- quest was for $3,942 to begin meeting this need. If funded, the Department would work closely with the Department of Social Ser- vices which has a similar need for its Medicaid Clients. Thank you for reconsideration of these two budget items. On be- half of the Senior Citizens, we appreciate the County Manager's support and your support for the work of the Department. Staff is here to answer any specific questions about these items. ORANGE COUNTY- DEPARTMENT ON AGING he 011 e r Cn 410 Sout et aldrn we Street rang Extension Senio e ter Chapel Hill,N.C,27S 14 °°°.t. °`v Northern Orange Senior Center (919)968-4478 �a. r '�; 300 West Tryon Street :� 732.9orou N. Jerry M.Passmore C.27278 732.9361 —Hillsborough Director `fit ' 967-9251 -Durham Hill '''� °i""•" 688-7333—Durham 227-2032—Mebane Reconsider ton of DoA Budget Items for FY 87_88 1. Need for Full Time Rece tionist-Secretar Covera e the Hillsborough Office (10-670_02) Rationale Hi h Level of Traffic into De artment dail CAT drivers, medical shuttle passengers Nutrition Site participants DoA program personnel from other office (Chapel Hill) -- each staff member is in the Hillsborough office at least one day a week and at other time for special appointments. Persons seeking directions to other county Those reserving conference room, up ooriret, ncies picki keys, etc. , etc. , etc. ng up returing ning (On one Wednesday, there was logged 37 "walk-in above categories) THESE; OF walk-in inquiries" DoA CLIENTS WHO COME IN FOR SENIOR ARE IN ADDITION INQUI IE TO INFORMATION; ETC; CITIZEN"S CARD; INQUIRIES] Heav load of Tele hone Calls All transportation requests All trip-special event reservations contact back day before trip (and the reverse - need to full loads) P to ensure buses indeed have All calls for nutrition site - only one that does not have its own phone Tendency for switchboard operators to refer complex requests to DoA Messages-appointments for rotating staff CAT and courier arrangements All "official" calls from other count As of August 1, monitoring of 22 CAT vehiiclesevia 2-wa will be the responsibility y of office personnel y radios IMPACT WITHOUT ADEQUATE FRONT DEST COVERAGE Program personnel will put aside do reception-clerical work which willrresultein°nsor depart to work and financial waste. The public will be expense of staff time and morale, poor department expense ofll be very ill served as the A saving of a few thousand y eXl?ensive. NC DISTRIBUTED:q - ,- acs - - - -- :range ffaunfg „Schools 200 EAST KING STREET HILLSBOROUGH,NORTH CAROLINA 27278 OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT (918( 732.8126 March 23, 1987 Mr. Ken Thompson County Manager's Office 106 E. Margaret Lane Hillsborough, NC 27278 Dear Mr. Thompson: The Orange County Schools Health Advisory Council is very concerned about the Northern Orange Dental Clinic. It is of the utmost importance that we continue to have a dental clinic for those students in Northern Orange County whose families are limited financially. We have many students that use the clinic because there is no other way they could get dental care. Those students that receive free lunch can get help through the clinic with School Health money. We ask that you provide funding in your new budget to pay for a residence service for the dental clinic. With the residence fund we in turn get the services of dental students, dental auxiliary students and attending dentists from the UNC School of Dentistry. Please give this matter your utmost consideration in con- tinuing to provide better dental health to the residents of Orange County. Thank you in advance for your services to Orange County. - Sincerely, . ./..6., Donna Gregory ,_ Chairman - Orange County leaf th Advisory Council ila4kr44 . gal/;,-e/' Barbara Davis, R.N. Health Services Coordinator Orange County Schools Dv3vr a u' a rm Donna Williams Health Education Coordinator fs . cc: Dr. Eugene S. Howden Mr. Jerry Robinson Ms. Shirley Marshall li tati tounta *trots � 0 C S G STREET 2O0 EAST KIN CAROLINA 27278 H1L�E60ROlIGH NORTH 7 812 �,, (8191 • June 10, 1987 OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENOENT Chairperson Shirley Marshall, Commissioners Mrs. County Board of 106 E. Margaret Lane 106 Margaret Hillsborough to d, asked me Dear Mrs Marshall, Dflan school Our an, Mr. Lindsay on our he Chairm information Board additional budget. Particularly, School between system's h You with some continuation the differences cula and if provide s current information on recommended system that l provide Manager requested What the County occurred- our budget and ntify how this difference was put to identify budget of current possible how our continuation review explain conduct a all, let me year we of expected First of March of every calculation Then a budget together. ti includes a our budget. revised estimate operations which within This Budget year approval. "Current Year area for Board is titled to what expenditures request and This equates amendment is Prep et request. "revised our budget 27 o f our req mendation as again is included in thru recom once ages 13 to in his we figure e for lggb-87„ on P refers Next Manager county departments. continuation the County the for expected projected cost rice increases, (5%) for estimate" for our P announced P salary increases by line item We use 5%), expected of mid-year coming year. factors costs is earned the inflation well as annualized advanced degree of general price ses employees, as an advan estimate when in our best our current (this happens results increases Cline`by-line effort salary mid-year). This for the next year. of revenues total needs e by line forecast the county our same lin figured is way, we do the revenue to be the county allotment Along the ear. The last except planned the next Y All revenues the total P Tequest which _____........miimilimillill for appropriation. from county requested app then. subtracted is the are combined and The continuation expenditures. a Mrs. Shirley Marshall, Chairperson Page 2 June 10, 1987 then includes the effect of changes i of income and fund in o ther revenues (like changes balance anges on the going down for next and the interest i expenditure side. Year) Our line-by-line ffect ne-b -1 budget re Our needs for quest is the only corn the next complete managers re Year, We also Y to know Attachment #quest for additional information n a response #1). Our nformatian on to the has three response is included each year (see attachments also, as Attachment #2 which I have met with at their Gordon faker to review "continuation" figure. how the appropriation figure He started county arrived he added the gure and made with last figure 1 a total of year's county request provided seven adjustments, for additional for salaries in my First (electricity, nformation. Then y response y water, insurance he selected five n the figure separate increases on vehicles, line items exception of and decreases property, and liability) to increase when area, he decreased with the Beene prior enar had requested 20%. The the amount to adjusted already was add 5 to the amount which adjustment hno a A t first t glance this seven dirty amount for step method should makes a "continuation" budget give a no allowance for The quick and allows a hand full of changes on the problem is that information line items to exceed e5%. side and only response it o information on response) highlighted twelve items My Attachment question memo in the o and of course this was rns (sea Attachment #2 My der for opening paragraph not a complete refer You to understand g aph states •'f would list. to our formal our budget re caution that board approved requesquest you will need to in The question of the under discussion proper amount to b our air-conditioned urrently. We budget for toctricit floor space requested 20� electricity is the high school pace will increase due the fact that more to heat and ro project is Completed. That space next year as more by the . We also received n will also "electrical Division of Plant an "Energy require costs are Operation which gY Bulletin" inflation". predicted to continue stated The bulletin a steady in Part that a rate increase went on to say that Y climb above of 28% next year and CP �` L was that the industry as requesting a whole IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I Mrs. Shirley Marshall, Chairperson Page 3 June 10, 1987 would also be requesting questing large increases. school/carnF operations We have sum and will at an also added a large add a second school this Su conditioned school year g increase in electric comer, This last needs. all adds up to Mrs. Marshall, I am a handout also providing You a copy (Attachment on the last our Principals and ment #3) of each of the ast three board members, 28 items pages gives a brief explanation on our refinement xplanist. of At this and expansion point, we have not list. continuation budget. Gordon just understand ordo and what exactly is a that the 1 continue to talk and I school County Manager want systems prior to the meeting does to meet Ys' we are willing to g on the 17th with both busy schedule of meet of June. . As bsy Sc dule closing school any time we can work is into and reports. completing year our financial arrna records If I can end close of Please ask. provide any other Yours in Public Education, 4.4 -,,,,d& - Wayne E. Watts Director of Business Affairs WEW/kd CC: Lindsay Efland Dan G. Lunsford • North Carolina Department of Human Resources Division of Health Services P.O.Box 2091 •Raleigh,North Carolina 27602.2091 James G. Martin, Governor David T.Flaherty,Secretary Ronald H.Levine,M.D.,M.P.H. May 29, 1987 State Health Director Mr. Bill McKinney ! Orange County Animal Shelter 1081 Airport Road Chapel Fill, North Carolina 27514 Dear Mr. McKinney: Recently you asked that I give you a written notice of my views as North Carolina's Public Health Veterinarian on the incidence of rabies cases as well as animals, especially cats, wearing identification tags. I hope that this letter satisfies your purpose. The increase of diagnosed rabies cases in the United States and the Southeast in particular has been alarming. Rabies has been diagnosed in wildlife due to their lifecycles. While the chances of a g prom in contact with a wild animal increases as we pitatn coming in chances of a dog or cat coming in contact withhone tistmuch higher. Vaccination of dogs and cats is a proven effective method of preventing rabies in those vaccinated Tanimalethat the of a contracting rabies from a rabid animal.. Enclosed you will find a computer printout of the diagnosed cases of rabies for the Southeast. You will notice that in all states experiencing rabies in dogs and cats, with the exception of Tennessee, more cats had rabies than dogs. This is probably due to their natural hunting instinct coupled with their innate curiosity. I feel that a county is justified in asking that animals wear identification that allows the county to find the owner of that animal. The North Carolina rabies tag serves that function in addition to showing the animal's vaccination status for rabies. There are various collars that are designed for cats that will either "break-away" or stretch to allow for the animal's escape if trapped by the collar. Mr. McKinney, if you have any questions please call me at (919) 733-3410. Sincerely, Lee Hunter, D.V.M. Public Health Veterinarian Environmental Epidemiology Branch LI-I t km Enclosure R RABIES SUMMARY FOR: NORTH CAROLINA, VIRGINIA, GEORGIA SOUTH CAROLINA, TENNESSEE STATE TOTAL DOGS CATS FOXES SKUNKS RACCOONS BATS OTHERS GEORGIA 1981 225 4 2 8 8 173 1982 213 5 6 7 17 12 5 164 2 1983 214 1 7 8 7 2 2 1984 200 1 7 5 16 164 25 2 1985 9 158 10 200 7 5 11 164 10 2 1986 202 2 4 0 15 5 154 17 5 TENNESSEE 1981 251 7 0 10 215 1982 356 3 0 11 321 1 16 2 1983 191 2 5 2 1984 81 8 0 1 172 1 2 4 68 0 13 1 5 1 2 1985 74 3 0 1986 152 4 0 7 127 0 10 0 0 14 0 SOUTH CAROLINA 1981 50 1 3 1 0 1982 66 3 12 3 0 28 15 0 0 2 1 1 1983 35 35 19 2 1984 59 2 3 0 1 20 4 0 1985 62 39 14 0 1986 62 3 7 0 0 40 11 2 11 4 1 1 31 10 2 VIRGINIA 1981 167 0 3 7 45 1982 745 2 10 12 645 9 8 1983 625 0 59 645 9 8 1983 625 0 6 15 33 545 17 9 1984 209 11 22 158 11 3 1986 200 1 3 11 43 102 16 0 3 12 38 139 2 3 6 NORTH CAROLINA 1981 19 0 1982 ° 0 0 0 19 p 982 66 p 0 2 26 0 18 0 1983 24 0 1984 27 0 0 0 6 0 18 0 0 1985 12 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 12 0 1986 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 Prepared by Veterinary Public Health, Environmental Epidemiology Branch O S h ar a Ii?range (Iounfg Schools o1s 200 EAST KING STREET orKtCE or THE 54 PE RIryTENdENT HILLSBOROUGH,NORTH CAROLINA 27278 (919) 732-8126 M E M O TO: Gordon Baker, Finance Director Orange CountyWl �I/�A�,�, ) FROM: Wayne Watts,' Director of Business Affair Orange County Schools Affairs DATE: May 14, 1987 SUBJECT: Budget Information FY 1987-88 same subject dated March 31, 1987 County Manager's Memo I am providing the enclosed information in response to the Manager's request. I would caution that in order for you to understand our budget request you will need to refer to our formal board approved request which was hand delivered to your offices yesterday. The following numbered responses are keyed to the manager's request: 1. Monthly line item detail statements will continue to be forwarded monthly through the end of the year. 2. Final State Allotment 1986-87 - see attachment #1 (4 a most recent state allotment. Most 1ke il 1 p final for our allotment. We could receive others right up�totheo u endofJune. The Tentative Allotment for 1987-88 - see attachment #2 (3 pages). 3. Fund balance appropriated will be $40,000 for the Current Expense Fund and $15,000 for the Capital Outlay Fund. These amounts are subject to change if necessary after we receive our audit report next fall. The amount appropriated to the Capital Outlay Fund may increase if several projects in the planning stage are not finalized by June 30. Our estimated fund balances available but not appropri- ated will be approximately $25,000 for Current Expense and $10,000 for Capital Outlay. 4. Rate of employee benefits: Social Security Matching - July/Dec. 1987 . 7. 15% Retirement Matching Jan./June 1988 . 7.51% Health Insurance 11 2� Number of full time p oyees annually (up 25%) (2 pages). This figure mofe107edoes not include-anEe attachment n 3 any positions funded 217-71 Gordon Baker Page 2 May 14, 1987 partially from other than County Funds i.e. I,S.S,, Voc. Ed. , Atten- dance Counselor and Technician, Drug & Alcohol Counselor, JTPA Guid- ance and Finance Director. Part time permanent employees - 6 Custodians see attachment #3 for list of currently funded positions. 5. We would like to highlight several of our critical needs which will require additional County Funds. All but the last item listed below are part of our continuation budget request but the need goes beyond normal inflation increases. Health Benefits: Our cost -of providing health insurance to our employees is expected to increase 'by 25% to $958 each. We have no choice in covering this increased cost. $2 5 Utilities - Electric Service: Expected rate increases nd a the dd aition of air-conditioned increase because conditionedspaceatOrange High. $59,000 Utilities - Water Service: Expected to increase 100% or more due to town rate increase. $25,200 Accreditation: Expected to increase 100% due to our;receiving an evaluation by Southern Association next year. $30 0 Exce tional Child Contract Services: Expected to increase due to loss of one time state grant and addition of one blind 'student. $13 2 000 Re airs Com uter and Band Instruction: bons to inventory re uire added fundin Aforof equipment and addi- q g P $��` Instructional Div, Printin and Travel: The new math/science gram will increase local printing costs and added employees will require more travel funds. S2,000 Audit Service: Expected to increase due to single audit require- ments. $2 L__000 Travel Allowance: Contracted local travel allowance has been increased. $10,800 Fidelit Bond, Vehicle and Pro ert Insurance: E faster than inflation, Expected to increase $4� Contract a air Vehicles: As the age of our fleet increases we will need added repairs. $3,000 vita-- Gordon Baker • Page 3 May 14, 1987 Personnel De artment. Increased employees will require added travel, printing, recruiting and supplies expenditures. $8 000 Current 8x ense Rx ansion and Refinements (see pages 30 & 31 in Budget Request) Some of these items are due to a reduction in State Funds, others are refinements to improve current programs and some are new initiatives. $471 312 6. Computation of Local salary/supplement increases - see attachment #3 7. Cost of any added local positions -(see page 30 & 31 of Budget Request) q st) /bpw Attachments 3 CC: Dan Lunsford W/O attachment Ken Thompson W/O attachment 9 OF ,P.i. i ?fl.— kMiD I RUN DATE: 04124/87 EVISION--PUBLIC SCEOOLS (� �• EAR 1986-87 SYSTEM REVISION 4: 41 .�{ SYSTEM REVISION OATB: 4/22/87 1 APR 2 3 087 ---- CIIR= A[WIME T{REVISION ---::----- Y-T-D ALLOTHM REVISION --- ----- TOTAL REVISED ALLOT?EENT ------; momm HoxM IOrrrES � OF OF CP XITION WLOYKW REVISION An POSITION EMFLaYN r REVISION An POSITICII E}[PLOpkW REVISION A}ST ------ ------- -------- 4-00 37.760.00 61.00 575.840.00 42.075.00 42.075.00 -50 11.685.00 .50 11.585.00 2•00 9,230.00 5.540.00 5.988.00 3.560.00 9.624.00 158.190.00 190.50 41.530.00 4.560.645.00 _ 885.00 1.00 45.990.00 15.540.00 7.00 282.345.00 1.00 38.263.00 9.00 258.927.00 .48 15.333.00 .48 15.133.00 250.00 250.00 169.00 202.800.00 168.637.00 671.00 -7.609.00 10.00 176.931.00 171,218.00 223.269.00 12.568.00 12,568.00 168,804.W 243,150.00 I.00 31.260.00 3.00 31,260.00 365-00 365.00 105.00 122,115.00 1.00 44.688.00 2.00 85.848.00 -1.00 -36,592.00 -544.00 23.203.00 :. 488.727.00 346.00 7 558 00 OF EDCCATION REPORT RUX DATE: 04/24/87 VISION--PUBLIC SCHOOLS SYSTEM REVISION 4: 41 AR 1986-87 SYSTEM REVISION DATE: 4122187 1 --- CURRM ALLOTPW REVISION --'.---- Y-T-D ALLOrMff REVISION TOTAL REVISED AIdA1AMT ----- MONTRS MONTHS NORM OF I OF OF SITION EMPLOYXW REVISION AXT POSITION EMPLOYMW REVISION An POSITION EXPLOYMENT REVISION AMT 5,347.00 251,156.D0 300.00 1,00D.00 .50 13,700.00 10.330.00 2.000.00 1O.DOD.0O 405.00 1.750.00 9.720.00 42,000.00 •1;572.00 1.OD 39,634.00 11.00 38,043.00 44.00 147,819.00 7.00 8,141.00 7.00 8,141.00 11,901.00 42.093.00 10.000.00 10.000.00 15.200.00 16.00 421,600.OD .50 11.555.00 1.00 9.440.00 12.641.00 33.00 88.376.00 2.280.00 2.280.00 904.00 6,319.00 1.416.00 9,898.00 -490.00 2.038.00 1.032.00 1.032.00 7,392.00 372.00 372.00 500.00 500.00 23,549.DD 16;478.00 16,478.00 10.138.00 847,119.00 1.520.00 48,D49.00 29,282.00 18.267.00 53.802.00 3D OF LDLCA;iON d :(1fI RUN DATE: 04124/87 REVISION--PUBLIC SCHOOLS SYSTEX REVISION #: 41 !EAR 1986-87 SYSTEM REVISION DATE: 4122187 ----- CURRENT ALLOrAW REVISION ---:I----- T-T-D ALLOTHW REVISION -----::----- TOTAL REVISED ALLar4W ------; m%US MUTES HONTES OF OF' OF 'OSITION EHFLOYKDIT REVISION AHT POSITION ENPLOYHENT REVISION Alfa POSITION DeLOYMM REVISION Ah? 37,139.00 6.000.00 6,000.00 35.690.00 35.690.00 2.185.00 2,185.00 1,432.00 76.757.00 3.333.00 3.333.00 38.361.00 63,144.00 -1.396.00 6.98 18.00 1.018/,535.0 303.48 358.00 10,821.398.00 tl/cu[� 95,260.00 9.541.00 221.00 384.353.00 2.50 4,240.00 .3 4.50 7.632.00 4oC-4 L 682.00 28,330.00 ,,tA rc N 1.069.00 44.378.00 17.465.00 2.628.00 41.D16.00-X10�o Sri 21.516.00 32.449.00 32.449.00 .19.819.00 2b6,203:00 5,819.00 5.819.00 44.503.00 146.026.00 146,026.00 4.500.00 4.500.00 202,714.00 228.00 1.163,509.00 f �_ RD OF r"[1t1CA7i0H KKP0Kr RUN DATE: 04!24167 REVISION--PUBLIC SCBOOLS SYSTEM REVISION R: 41 FEAR 1986-87 SYSTEM REVISION DATE: 4/22/87 ----- CURRENT ALL(1TF[r REVISION ---.1---- Y-T-D ALLI7TIMW REVISION ------ TOTAL REVISED JLLOTIIDTT ------; mum lO)m mollrgs OF OF, CP Ft)SITICN EXPLOYKENT REVISION AW POSITION EXPLOYIENf REVISION Altk POSITION WL TXEYr REVISION AMT -------- ---------- --°�=------ -------- --------- ---- ---- ------- ---------- ------------ -1,396.00 6.98 18.00 1.221,249.00 303.48 386.00 11.984.907.00 t I t I STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION 03/30/87 CONTINUATION PLANNING BUDGET ALLOTMENTS - PUBLIC SCHOOLS FISCAL YEAR 1987-88 680 DR. DAN G. LUNSFORD. SUPERINTENDENT ORANGE COUNTY SCHOOLS 200 E. KING ST. HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27278 i----- CONTINUATION PLANNING ALLOTMENT •.-__; UNIFORM CHART OF ACCOt1N1`S MONTHS BUDGET CODE POSITION or EMIP AMOUNT SALARY-TEACHER AIDES-REGULAR 5100-01-1XX 59.00 556.960.00 MATH/SCIENCE EXTENDED EMPLOYMENT 562X-01-1X11 2.00 6.870.00 MATH/SCIBNCH EQUIPMENT GRADES X-6 5634-OI-XXX 5.668.00 MATH EQUIPMENT GRADES 7-12 5640-Ol-XXX 5.760.00 SCIENCE EQUIPMENT GRADES 7-8 5650-OI-XXX 3.515.00 SCIANCB EOIIpKRN' GRADES q-12 56hn-ni-m Q VAA m 0313018'1 BpUCAT13N ?OA SC-OS SIATA BOARD OYES - 7 ,,r`` ' CONTINUATION pt,ANN1 F� AA 1981-88 / SFORD. 5UFBR1NT�4ENT 1 DR. DAN CO UN5C930� ORANGEtATtON FLAKING �' - 200 B. KING ST. ; HILLSBOROUGg• NORTH CAROLINA 27218 MONIES UNIFORM CHART BLIP AMOUNT OF ACCOUNTS POSITION OF - BUDGET 0046 - ^ ^ 556,960.00 __. " -� 6.810.00 5100-01-1X9 2.00 5.66800 562X-O1-1XX 5.160•04 Woo SATE/SCIE CE TENDED AIDES-REGULAR 12 563X-O1-XXK 810.000 KATE/SCIENCE EXTENDED EQUIPMENT �� X_6 5640-01.-XXX 9.138.00 MATH/SCIENCE GRADES 7-12 5650-01-01 91,342.00 MATH EQUIPMENT 4 IP 7-8 5660-01^X%9 4.362.069.00 SCIENCE E tPl T GRADES 9-12 6 0-01-XXX 885.00 SCIENCE EQUIPMENT l 46,410.00 ALAR SUPPLIES 5%0X-01-1XX UCTIONAL TEACTR- -0l-X1IX 266.805.00 SALARY-Ccepic�'► A � 6320 1.00 5E 632%-01-111 1.00 249.687.00 CENTRAL UPERI OTHER 641X^01-114 1.00 15.136.00 SALARY-SUPERINTE!>DBNT 641K-O1-1XK .48 250.00 SALARY-CLASSIFIED PRINCIPAL 6520-01-115 201 600.00 PRINCIPAL 6520-01-312 168.00 168.713.00 SALARY-4INANCB OFFFINRRAE OFFICERS 668.00 6540-01-1X1I S AFF DEVELOPMENT-FINANCE 654X-01 116.931.30 SALARY-CUSTODIAN OF PI,ANI 6543^01-XXX 10.00 223.269.00 ENERGY -OPERATION OF PLAN 6550-01-1U - Z43931.p0- 6550-01-1XX 3,2 223,269.00 PERSONNEL 65rp-01-X ' 1.00 120.952.00 I OTHER SALARY-BUS TRANSPORTATION 65�-01-162 104.00 40,268.00 7RANSFORTATION SUPERVISOR an-01-1r4 35,385.00' V OAR ANCE SUPERVISOR 1.00 VI SALARY-MAINTENANCE ASSISTANTS 6lgptt-01-11% 1.00 47626 00 EC SALARY-CLERICAL ALARY ASSCOIAL AS SUPERINTENDENT 630(-01-1XX 128,668.00 EC SALARY- IATB/ASSISTANT X910-01-211 26 888. 0 cam, 300.00 ECl SALARY-SUPERVISOR SaCtAL SECURITY COSTS X910-.1-221 EEA woo BOGP RETIREMENT U COSTS X910-01-231 10 556.00' EMPLOYER HpSF INSURANCE COSTS X921-01-121 10.00.0 0 TOTAL m EMPLOYER X�pDi-03-t33t 1.750.00'.0 RECRUITING OFFICERS 621X-03^02 0.276. 1 DUTY-FREE gygLDFtiENT-TRAVEL. 6210-04-361 31.341.03 GRAN C�DEVgLO����RIKfI� &BINDING N10-o4-xxx 641.0X'WEER DB@ELOPMEN'T-NORXSROP EXPENSES ALARY 6219-04-113 1�� 44.04 1 42,000.00. 656.0. .COORDINATOR 6219-04-119 31,341..03 TOTAL ADM I11 CAREER DEVELO T-EVALUATORS SALARY X910-04-2X9 16 00 67,377.00 ADM-GRADES K CAREER DEVELOPMENT-EVALUATORS 21.40 4,939,00 BENEFITS ADM-GRADES 9- CAREER DI;YBLOF PERSONNEL-CERTIFIED 5100-12-121 ADM FOR DRIVE! INSTRUCTIONAL PORT 7,546.00 SECURITY • 591042-211 ,939,00 DRIVER TRAINING-SALARY-TEACHER G-EMP SOCIAL SEC O S 5910-I2-2Z1 6939, 00 DRIVER TRAINING-EMPLOYER RETIREMENT 5910-12-221 N O T E : DRIVER TRAINING-EMPLOYER H INSURANCE COSTS 5X00-12-31 18.154.p4 ` " DRIVER TRAINING-0T - 831.824.00 1 DRIVER DEVELOPMENT CASTS 6%X0-28-XXX STAFF AID-EXCEPTIONAL XXXI-32-XXX STATE AID-�EpTIONAL CHILD 114, 1 New- /Al": Imr -104' I t- STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION 03/30/87 CONTINUATION PLANNING BUDGET ALLOTMENTS- PUBLIC SCHOOLS FISCAL YEAR 1987-88 680 ' DR. DAN G. LUNSFORD, SUPERINTENDENT ORANGE COUNTY SCHOOLS 200 E. KING ST. HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27278 I CONTINUATION PLANNING ALIMENT ! UNIFORM CHART OF ACCOUNTS MONTHS BUDGET CODE POSITION OP EMP AMOUNT SALARY-TEACHER AIDES-REGULAR 5100-01-1XX 59.00 556,960,00 MATH/SCIENCE EXTENDED EMPLOYMENT 562X-01-1XX 2.00 6,870.00 MATH/SCIENCE EQUIPMENT GRADES K-6 5630-01-XXX 5.668.00 MATH EQUIPMENT GRADES 7-12 5640-01-XXX 5,760.00 SCIENCE EQUIPMENT GRADES 7-8 5650-O1-XXX 3,515.00 SCIENCE EQUIPMENT GRADES 9-12 5660-01-XXX 9.138.00 INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 5X00-01-XXX _ . 91.342.00 SALARY-CLASSROOM TEACHER-REGULAR 5XOX-01-1XX 193750 4,362.069.00 CENTRAL OFFICE OTHER EXPENSE 6320-01-XXX 885.00 SALARY-SUPERINTENDENT 632X-01-111 1.00 46,410.00 SALARY-CLASSIFIED PRINCIPAL 641X-01-114 7.00 266.805.00 SALARY-ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL 641X-01-1XX -9.OG 249.687.00 SALARY-HINANCE OFFICER 6520-01-115 .48 15,136.00 STAFF DEVELOPMENT-FINANCE OFFICERS 6520-01-312 250.00 SALARY-CUSTODIAN 6540-01-1XX 168.00 201,600.00 ENERGY COST-OPERATION OF PLANT 6540-01-XXX , 168.773.00 OT; R COST-OPERATION OF PLANT 6540-01-XXX 668.00 TRANSPORTATION PERSONNEL 6550-01-1XX 10.00 176,931.00 SALARY-BUS DRIVER 6550-01-IXX 223,269.00 OTHER TRANSPORTATION COSTS 6550-01-XXX 243,150.00 SALARY-MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR 6580-01-162 1.00 31.260.00 SALARY-CLERICAL ASSISTANTS 6XXO-O1-IXX 104.00 ' 120,952.00 SALARY-ASSOCIATE/ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT 6XXX-01-11X 1.00 40,268.00 SALARY-SUPERVISOR 6XXX-01-1XX 1.00 35,385.00' EMPLOYER SOCIAL SECURITY COSTS X910-01-211 476,888.00 EMPLOYER RETIREMENT COSTS X910-01-221 728,668.00 EMPLOYER HOSP INSURANCE COSTS X910-01-231 T247,556.00- RECRUITING OFFICERS X921-01-121 300.00 DUTY-FREE PERIOD XXXX-03-XXD( 10,276.00, CAREER DEVELOPMENT-TRAVEL 10,000.00 CAREER DEVELOPMENT-PRINTING & BINDING 6210-04-361 1,750.00 CAREER DEVELOPMENT-WORKSHOP EXPENSES 6210-04-XXX 42,000.00. CAREER DEVELOPMENT-COORDINATORS SALARY 6219-04-113 1.00 37,341.00- CAREER DEVELOPMENT-EVALUATORS SALARY 6219-04-119 44.00 130,647.00' CAREER DEVELOPMENT-FRINGE BENEFITS X910-04-2XX 34,656.00 INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT PERSONNEL_CERTIFIED XXXX-07-1XX 16:00 395,328.00 DRIVER TRAINING-SALARY-TEACHER 5100-12-121 27.40 67,377.00 DRIVER TRAINING-EMPLOYER SOCIAL SECURITY COST - 5910-12-211 4,939.00 DRIVER TRAINING-EMPLOYER RETIREMENT COSTS 5910-12-221 7,546.00 DRIVER TRAINING-EMPLOYER HOSP INSURANCE COSTS 5910-12-231 2,099.00 DRIVER TRAINING-OT:I:R COSTS 5X00-12-XXX 6,144.00 STAFF DEVELOPMENT 6XX0-28-XXX 18,150.00 STATE AID-EXCEPTIONAL CHILD XXXX-32-XXX 831,824.00 d , v. ft I STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION 03/30(87 CONTINUATION PLANNING BUDGET ALLOTMENTS - PUBLIC SCHOOLS FISCAL YEAR 1987-88 680 DR. DAN G. LUNSFORD, SUPERINTENDENT ORANGE COUNTY SCHOOLS 200 E. KING ST. HILLSBOROUGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27278 CONTINUATION PLANNING ALLOTMENT I UNIFORM CHART OF ACCOUNTS MONTHS BUDGET CODE POSITION OF EMP AMOUNT CHILD NUTRITION-SUPERVISION 6XX0-35-XXX 46,345.00 COMMUNITY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT 7XX0-36-XXX 29,282.00 REMEDIATION SUPPORT XXXX-37-XXX 47,848.00 a;ALTH EDUCATION 6XX0-38-XXX 38,558.00 SUMMER SCHOOL-1987-88-TRANSPORTATION XXXK-65-XXX 4,370.00 IN-SCHOOL SUSPENSION/DROPOUT PREVENTION XXXX-66-XXX- 79,372.00 . , EDUCATION ECONOMIC SECURITY ACT 5XXO-67-XXX , - 4.699.00 SUM ER SCHOOL-1987-88-INSTRUCTIONAL XXXX-69-XXX 22.650.00 TOT STATE PUBLIC SCHOOL FUND • 298.98 343,40' - 10:189:364.00= TEXTBOOKS 94,460.00 VOCATIONAL ED-MONTHS OF EMPLOY-STATE • 210.00 353,166.00 VOCATIONAL ED-MONTHS OF EMPLOY-CON/HOMEMAKER 2.50 4,204.00 VOCATIONAL ED-MONTHS OF EMPLOY-INDUSTRY/ED - 4.00 6,727.00 VOCATIONAL ED-MONTHS OF EMPLOY-SOC SEC COSTS - ' 26,688.00 VOCATIONAL ED-MONTHS OF EMPLOY-RETIREMENT 40,779.00 VOCATIONAL ED-MONTHS OF EMPLOY-80SP INSURANCE 16,583.00 VOCATIONAL ED-NON-MATCHING 39,960.00 VOCATIONAL ED-HANDICAPPED --19,644.00 VOCATIONAL :'I-PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT - -- --.--,-------32.449.00 VOCATIONAL ED-DISADVANTAGED 25.113.00 ECIA 1-LOW INCOME (PRC 50)-------- --...-..... 295,472.00 ECIA 1-HANDICAPPED (PRC 52) 5,400.00 ECIA 2-CONSOLIDATED PROGRAMS (PRC 59) - -----...-- 45.096.00 EHA VI-B-HANDICAPPED (PRC 60) 155.170.00 TOTAL OTHER PROGRAMS 216.50 1,160,911.00 GRAND TOTAL 11.350.275.00 TOTAL ADM INCLUDING TMH 5.138 ADM-GRADES K-8 INCLUDING T U 3.615 ADM-GRADES 9-12 1.523 ADM FOR DRIVER TRAINING - 384 N 0 T B : TEACHERS AND AIDES EARNED ON SELF-CONTAINED HANDICAPPED CHILDREN (PRC 09) HAVE BEEN INCLUDED WITH T,r - - - - REGULAR TEAC;,:RS AND AIDES (PRC 01) IN THIS DOCUMENT. THE ALLOTMENTS WILL BE SEPARATED AND ADJUSTED BASED ON TENTH DAY MEMBERSHIP. r • STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION 03/30/81 /r EXPANSION PLANNING BUDGET ALLOTMENTS - PUBLIC SCHOOLS FISCAL YEAR 1987-88 680 DR. DAN G. LUNSFORD, SUPERINTENDENT ORANGE COUNTY SCHOOLS . 200 E. KING ST. HILLSBOROUGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27278 EXPANSION PLANNING ALLOTMENT I UNIFORM CHART OF ACCOUNTS MONTHS BUDGET CODE POSITION OF EMP AMOUNT INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES 5X00-01-Do( 43.234.00'7 SALARY-CLASSROOM TEACHER-REGULAR ✓ 5X0X-01-1XX - ' 1.00 22.898.00✓ SALARY-ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL 641X-01-1XX 1.00 -55.486.00✓ EMPLOYER SOCIAL SECURITY COSTS X910-01-211 13,520.00' EMPLOYER RETIREMENT COSTS X910-01-221 20,658.00+ EMPLOYER HOSP INSURANCE COSTS X910-01-231 7,661.00'' INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT PERSONNEL-CERTIFI " ✓ XXXX-07-1XX - .50 12.354.00 STAFF DEVELOPMENT 6XX0-28-XXX 22,952.00✓ STATE AID-EXCEPTIONAL CHILD XXXX-32-XXX 89,453.00-' SUMMER SCHOOL-1987-88-TRANSPORTATION XXXX-65-XXX 19,732.00. IN-SCHOOL SUSPENSION/DROPOUT PREVENTION XXXX-66-XKK 9,773.013'' SUMMER SCHOOL-1987-88-INSTRUCTIONAL . XXXX-69-XXX 135,101.00✓ SALARY:CLASSROOM TEACHER-REGULAR-EXPAND PRO 5X0X-XX-1X1(- • • 6.50 148,837.00 "SALARY-CLERICAL ASSISTANTS-SCHOOL BASED ✓ 6XXO-XX-1XX 4.00 55.824.00 TOT STATE PUBLIC SCHOOL FUND • WOKS 9,446.00 VOCATIONAL ED-MONTHS OF EMPLOY-STATE 73,779.00 VOCATIONAL ED-MONTHS OF EMPLOY-CON/HOMEMAKER 878.00 " VOCATIONAL ED-MONTHS OF EMPLOY-INDUSTRY/ED 1.405.00 VOCATIONAL ED-MONTHS OF EMPLOY-SCC SEC COSTS 5,575.00 VOCATIONAL ED-MONTHS OF EMPLOY-RETIREMENT 8.519.00 TOTAL OTHER PROGRAMS 99,602.00 GRAND Tam 646,113.00 TOTAL ADM INCLUDING TIE 5.138 ADM-GRADES K-8 INCLUDING TMH 3,615 ADM-GRADES 9-12 "1.523 ADM FOR DRIVER TRAINING 384 N 0 T E ; TEACHERS AND AIDES EARNED ON SELF-CONTAINED HANDICAPPED CHILDREN (PRC 09) HAVE BEEN INCLUDED WITH TT: REGULAR TEACH RS AND AIDES (PRC 01) IN THIS DOCUMENT. THE ALLOTMENTS WILL BE SEPARATED AND ADJUSTED BASED ON TENTH DAY MEMBERSHIP. COST CAREER TOTAL '. 5% INCREASE 6.21 INCREASE LADDER INCREASE ` $ 32,470 o$ $ 24,645 $ 75,459 6,434 13,435 175 175 9,020 8,495 17,515 5,050 5,050 2,765 3,283 126 126 252 � 728 728 1,323 1,323 - 2,646 1,957 3,913 5,870 547 547 1,094 1,094 2, 188 1,694* 1,694 1,287 1,533 577 1,155 1,732 4,875 4,875 6,827 6,827 4, 122 8,245 12,367 1, 112 5;312 6,458 6,458 9,711 9,711 1,116 1, 116 14,502 14,502 1, 142 1, 142 11;706 9,365 21,071 229 229 458 209 418 627 497 995 1,492 287 581 868 900 11800 2,700 90 90 435 435 245 245 250 1 ,316 287 581 868 $ 71,596 $ 58,651 $ 62,965 $224,587 R COST C'A PFLD TOTAL , r ENp. 52 INCREASE 6.21 INCREASE LADDER INCREASE $ 4lfilfi � $266,203 i s . ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET NEEDS HooLs JUNE 5, /987 THE COUNTY RE RECOMMENDATION dATION LESS ,PROVIDE BUDGET DO PROGRA OUR REF LEAVES US $86OR ANY PROGRAM WILL NOT ALL ADDRESS RECOM THE $66,399 EIS NTl S $8 6,ION SHORT O A CONTINUATION TS OR EXPANSION A CON ND DO ION BUT SOME OF THE T PUND�DN ED OF $971.312 UATION BUDGET AND ITEMS.HAT CURRENT 1 BECAUSE OUR POSSIBLE ACTIONS IS THA QUESTION OUR A BEEN ASKED NOTHING TO SCHOOL ITEMS CAN} TO COME UP EXPENSE BUDGET IS Y MIGHT CHOOSE ARE AS BOARD WOULD HAVE WOULD YOU MEMBERSHIP NO2' Sc CU WITH $96,3g 801 SALARIES, WS.WE COULD CUT ITEM BY OR MO( B�KS DUES,STAFF pE MEANS THAT THINGS NS HOWEVER.L XE UTPORTION pF THESE ALL NON SALARY 2. TERMINATE PMENT, ETC.. WOULD LIKE INSTRUCTIONAL COSTS, INSURANCE, 25%Y 3 CUT TEACH SEVERAL EMPLOYEES, HAVE TO BE CUT SOMETHING SUPPLIES, ER 25} 4. cUr OUR CAP TAL REPAIR OF BUILDINGS AND EQU SUPPLEMENTS/COACHING SUPPLEMENTS RECOMMENDATION. BUDGET IPMENT, ATION. ET p REPLACEMENT IMPROVEMENTS T PL $977 WOULD 09 pp HAVE TO BE CU WE ROMMEN VEHICLES. MAINTENANCE, R OUR RECURRING SEVERAY COMMISSIONERS RE D LAST YEAR. ETC.) HOWEVER INSTRUCTIONAL CAPITA UNDER THE V. , THE C?IDN L NEEDS MANA , WHICH WAS TO SEVERAL ARS CAPITA EED SAGER AL AND A THE (MIN BUILDING S HAVE MUCH BE INFLATION AGO REPORTED N S TASK ALLOWED ONLY $450,000 EQUIPMENT OR ILpINC CH CATCHING OF TION PROOF. OO A NEED FORCE« APPOINTED 0.000 THEAND THE MANAGER ALSO TO DO. THAT IS WHY OUR HAVE FGOONR OAS°0 EACH YEAR THE co:UN AMOUNT FALL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NOT RECOMMEND R REQUEST IS SIZABLE.UNANSWERED OVER MANY THIS AREA FUNDING SI47,000 STUDENT HE COMPLETIONS OUR PLANS/NEEDSANs W DICTATE.ILL NOT BE COMP BEGIN ARCHIT YEARS AND WE TOTAL OF S COMPLETION T F THE STIMATED TO C EXPANSION AT LETE WITH THAT NEW SCHOOL TH IN THE THE HIGH OUR CURRENT I.600 STUDENTS USING NINTH GRADERS WI 000, WILL ALSO SCHOOL AND PAVING HAVE TO WAIT UNDER EACH ITEM FOR ENTSTO THE AND PROD CENTER wE CURR NTLY HAVETHER STUDENTS THE BUDGET YOUR REFERENCE. MANAGER.RA1�f EXPANSION FOR A T TO FUND THESE NEEDS CE• AS STATED BEFORE. THE NEEDS ARE I LISTED ON THE NEXT AS THEY WERE ORE, THE SAGER HAS ALLROIU EXPLANATION PAGE F NOTHING IN HIS .• -••, CURRENT EXPENSE PROGRAM REFINEMENTS AND EXPANSION ITEMS We received initial requests which totaled in excess of $1,300,000. This amount was cut to $881,842 for items which were included in the "Superinten- dent's Recommended Budget FY 1987-88". The Superintendent's recommendation was divided into two sections. The first section included 37 items with a total cost of $560,842. The second section included 11 items with a total cost of $321,000. It was noted that this second section may possibly be funded by the state. These items have been approved by the State Board of Education but are subject to change pending General Assembly action. Local funds would be required for most of the items if not approved by the state this year. After due consideration by the Board. of Education, the first section of the Superintendent's recommendation was trimmed to 28' items totaling $471,312. This amount combined with our continuation budget request would require a per-child allocation from the county of $957.35 which is a 23.82 increase. Items recommended by the Board are as follows: 1. Part-time Custodian (C. P. ) •2. Assist. Principal (loss of State Funds C.E.) $ 40,800 3. Add Phone Lines (C.E.) 200 4. Assist. Principal (loss of State Funds A.L.S.) 40,800 5. Magical Thoughts (C.W.S) 6. SIMS Operator Aide Half-time 2, 00 7. Added Employment (C.W.S.) 6,0000 p yment Athletic Dir. (0.H.S.) 4,426 8. One-half Assist. Principal (0.H.5.) 9. Added Employment 20,000 p yment Guidance Aide (O.H.S.) 2,200 10. Custodian (0.H.S.) II. Vocational ITIE Teacher (0.H.S.) 1 ,000 12. Bus Driver Salary Increase $2/hr, 244,000 84,000 13. Bus Monitor Increase 14. Handicapped Student Bus Monitors 1 3,3 15. Bus Driver Training Bonus 3'3116 6 16. Maintenance Helper 7,000 17. One-half Finance Clerk 14.000 18. Athletic Grant 7,000 19. Reclassification Remediation Coordinator 6,000 20. Local E.T.T. 6,000 21. Personnel Computer Phone Line 2,550 22. Classified Personnel Supplement Plan 5,000 23. Band Grant 25,000 24. Director of Instruction 1,000 25. Instructional Enrichment Program 35,000 26. Computer Software 4,000 27. New Textbook Adoption Su 7,000 r 28. Increase Teacher Supplement from to 4% 60,4,200 • 6 200 TOTAL $471,312 /bpw 5/7/87 1. PART-TIME CUSTODIAN (C.P.) $8,000 WE HAVE ADDED 3 CLASSROOM TRAILERS ALREADY AND WILL LIKELY ADD ANOTHER THIS SUMMER. OUR ENROLLMENT HAS INCREASED BY 150 CHILDREN AND WE HAVE ADDED BEFORE AND AFTER SCHOOL CARE AS WELL AS OTHER SPECIAL PROGRAMS OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS WITHOUT ADDING ANY CUSTODIAL HELP. 2/4. ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS (C.E. AND A.L.s.) $81,600 WE CURRENTLY EARN 9 ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL POSITIONS FUNDED BY THE STATE. THAT NUMBER WILL BE CUT TO 7 NEXT YEAR BECAUSE OF A CHANGE IN THE STATE ALLOCATION FORMULA. WITHOUT LOCAL FUNDS. WE WOULD HAVE TO CUT BACK THE NUMBER OF ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS. 3. ADD PRONE LINES (C.E.) $200 CENTRAL ELEMENTARY CURRENTLY HAS ONLY TWO PHONE LINES. THIS ITEM WOULD ADD A THIRD LINE. AT TIMES BOTH LINES ARE IN USE AND ADDITIONAL CALLS CAN NOT BE PLACED OR RECEIVED. ANOTHER LINE WILL ALLOW OUR COUNSELOR, OFFICE STAFF AND TEACHING STAFF TO DO THEIR JOBS MORE EFFICIENTLY. 5. MAGICAL THOUGHTS (C.W.S.) $2,500 THIS WRITING PROGRAM, WHICH HAS GAINED NATIONAL ATTENTION FOR OUR SCHOOL SYSTEM. IS A SEPARATE ENTITY FROM THE REGULAR INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM. IT HAS EARNED STANFORD THE HONOR OF BEING NAMED A CENTER OF EXCELLENCE IN LEARNING, YET WE HAVE HAD TO TAKE PART OF OUR INSTRUCTIONAL MONEY FROM THE ENGLISH DEPARTMENT TO FUND THE PROGRAM. IF WE ARE TO MAINTAIN THIS PROGRAM AND KEEP THE NATIONAL ATTENTION, THE PROGRAM NEEDS SEPARATE FUNDING. 6. SIMS OPERATOR (AIDE) HALF-TIME (C.W.S.) $6,000 THE STUDENT INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (SIMS) PROJECT IS SLATED TO BE IMPLEMENTED IN THE JR. HIGH SCHOOL THIS FALL. THIS SYSTEM WILL HANDLE ALL ATTENDANCE AND TEACHER REGISTERS BY COMPUTER INITIALLY. WE WILL NEED AN OPERATOR TO RELIEVE THE IEACHERs OF KEEPING THESE MANUAL RECORDS. 7• ADDED EMPLOYMENT ATHLETIC DIRECTOR (0.H.S.) $4,426 THE NEED FOR A 12 MONTH ATHLETIC DIRECTOR AT THE HIGH SCHOOL HAS BEEN DOCUMENTED AND PRESENTED TO THE SCHOOL BOARD ON MORE THAN ONE OCCASION. MOST?OF THE SCHOOLS WE COMPETE WITH IN OUR AAAA C FERENCE HAVE FULL-TIME ATHLETIC DIRECTORS. 8. ONE-HALF ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL (0.H.S.) $20,000 WE CURRENTLY HAVE ONE AND ONE HALF ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS AT A. L. STANBACK. AFTER GRADE RESTRUCTURING THIS FALL THEY WILL NEED TO KEEP ONE ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL. THE OTHER ONE-HALF POSITION WILL BE TRANSFERRED TO O.H.S. AND NEW FUNDS ARE NEEDED TO ADD ANOTHER ONE-HALF POSITION. THIS WILL GIVE O.H.S. ONE FULL-TIME ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL TO HANDLE THE 400+ ADDED NINTH GRADERS MOVING TO THAT SCHOOL THIS FALL. 9. ADDED EMPLOYMENT GUIDANCE AIDE (0.H.S.) $2,200 SUMMER EMPLOYMENT Is NEEDED FOR THE GUIDANCE SECRETARY TO HANDLE EXTENSIVE TYPING, COLLEGE PAPER WORK, TRANSCRIPTS. VERIFICATION OF SCHOOL RECORDS, ETC. 10. CUSTODIAN (O.H.S.) $13,000 OUR EXPANSION PROJECT WILL ADD 33,000 SQUARE FEET OF NEW FLOOR SPACE ALONG WITH 400 MORE STUDENTS. TWO CUSTODIANS ARE NEEDED, BUT WE WILL TRY TO MAKE IT WITH ONE. 11. VOCATIONAL ITIE TEACHER (0.H.s.) $24,000 OUR ENROLLMENT IS EXPECTED TO BE UP IN THE INTRODUCTION TO THE TRADES COURSE WITH THE NINTH GRADE AT O.H.S. , WE NEED A, SECOND TEACHER IN THIS AREA. 12. BUS DRIVER SALARY INCREASE $2/H17. $84,000 THE STATE ALLOCATES $4.68 PER HOUR FOR OUR DRIVERS. WITH THIS PAY RATE WE HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO MAINTAIN A STABLE DRIVING FORCE. OTHER SYSTEMS IN THIS AREA SUPPLEMENT DRIVERS WITH LOCAL FUNDS 50 IT IS VERY DIFFICULT TO KEEP OUR ADULT DRIVERS. STUDENT DRIVERS WILL BE A THING OF THE PAST IN THE NEAR FUTURE. WE NEED TO GET THE CHILDREN TO SCHOOL SAFE AND ON TIME BEFORE THEY CAN LEARN. 13. BUS MONITOR INCREASE $17,$20 WE CURRENTLY HAVE 10 PEOPLE WORKING AS MONITORS ON OUR REGULAR 77 SCHOOL BUSES WHO RECEIVE $1.50 PER TRIP. WE NEED TO ADD 11 MORE AND INCREASE PAY TO 53.00 PER TRIP. THESE MONITORS AID THE BUS DRIVER BY MAINTAINING STUDENT DISCIPLINE. 14. HANDICAPPED STUDENT BUS MONITORS $3,316 WE HAVE ADDED A FOURTH BUS FOR HANDICAPPED STUDENTS AND NEED TO ADD A MONITOR FOR THAT BUS TO AID THE DRIVER. 15. BUS DRIVER TRAINING BONUS $7,000 CURRENTLY, OUR NEW DRIVERS COMPLETE SEVERAL DAYS OF TRAINING WITHOUT PAY. WE WOULD LIKE TO PROVIDE AN INCENTIVE TO STAY WITH US AS DRIVERS BY PAYING A $100 TRAINING BONUS WHEN THEY COMPLETE SIX MONTHS OF DRIVING. 16. MAINTENANCE HELPER $14,000 WE ARE ADDING MORE BUILDING SPACE TO OUR SYSTEM AND THE BALANCE IS AGING. A HELPER WOULD ALLOW OUR SKILLED TRADESMEN TO BE MUCH MORE EFFECTIVE. ALL MAINTENANCE MEN ARE LOCALLY PAID. 17. ONE-HALF FINANCE CLERK $7,000 OUR TOTAL BUDGET HAS INCREASED FROM LESS THAN $10,000,000 TO OVER $20,000,000 WITHOUT AN INCREASE IN PERSONNEL. THERE ARE MORE AND MORE PEOPLE TO PAY, PURCHASE ORDERS TO PLACE AND BILLS TO PAY WHEN PROGRAMS LIKE SUMMER SCHOOL, BEFORE AND AFTER SCHOOL CARE, SPECIAL STATE PROGRAMS LIKE CAREER LADDER AND ONE TIME GRANTS ARE ADDED. 18. ATHLETIC GRANT $3,000 THE COST OF OPERATING ATHLETIC PROGRAMS CONTINUES TO GO UP. GATE RECEIPTS CAN NO LONGER FUND THE TOTAL PROGRAM. THIS WILL BE A BIG PROBLEM WITHOUT THE NINTH GRADE AT STANFORD NEXT YEAR. 19. RECLASSIFICATION OF REMEDIATION COORDINATOR $6,000 WE CURRENTLY HAVE A FEDERALLY FUNDED CHAPTER I COORDINATOR 6 WOULD LIKE TO RECLASSIFY THE POSITION TO REMEDIAL PROGRAMS COORDINATOR. THIS WOULD PROVIDE A TRAINED PROFESSIONAL TO FACILITATE PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION, VERIFICATION, AND STAFF ORIENTATION AND SUPERVISION FOR THE THREE DIFFERENT TYPES OF REMEDIAL PROGRAMS PRESENTLY FUNDED IN OUR SCHOOL SYSTEM. 20. LOCAL E.T.T. SUPPLEMENT $8,000 A REQUIREMENT OF THE CAREER LADDER PROGRAM INCLUDES THE COMPLETION OF A 30 HOUR COURSE TITLED EFFECTIVE TEACHER TRAINING. A STIPEND OF $500 IS PAID ALL STATE EMPLOYEES WHO COMPLETE THIS TRAINING. WE NEED TO FUND THE STIPEND FOR ALL OF OUR NEW LOCAL AND FEDERAL EMPLOYEES, 21. PERSONNEL COMPUTER PHONE LINE $2,550 THIS LINE WILL ALLOW THE PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT TO ACCESS THE FILES FOR TEACHERS AT THE STATE. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION IN RALEIGH. THIS WILL STREAMLINE THE PROCESS OF OBTAINING INFORMATION CONCERNING TEACHERS WITH PARTICULAR EMPHASIS ON CERTIFICATION. 22. CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL SUPPLEMENT PLAN $25.000 THIS NEW PROGRAM WOULD ALLOW US TO REWARD OUR BEST AND MOST DESERVING CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEES. THE PROGRAM INVOLVES SEVERAL DIFFERENT REWARDS BASED ON TRAINING COMPLETED, PERFORMANCE, AND LONGEVITY. 23. HAND GRANT $1,500 WE WOULD LIKE TO INCREASE OUR GRANT FUNDS BY $500 FOR EACH OF OUR THREE BANDS. THESE FUNDS ARE USED FOR MATERIALS, INSURANCE, TRAVEL EXPENSES, ETC. 24. DIRECTOR OF INSTRUCTION $35,000 THIS PERSON WOULD WORK WITH THE SUPERVISORY PORTION OF ALL INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMS. THE PERSON WOULD HELP WITH THE OVERALL INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM COORDINATION, TEXTBOOK ADOPTIONS, REGIONAL CENTER MEETINGS, AND PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT AS IT RELATES TO TEST RESULTS. 25. INSTRUCTIONAL ENRICHMENT PROGRAM $4,000 THIS PROGRAM WOULD ALLOW THE OFFERING OF TWO SUPER SATURDAYS AND A ONE WEEK SUMMER ENRICHMENT EXPERIENCE FOR A NUMBER OF STUDENTS. . 26. COMPUTER SOFTWARE $7,000 WE HAVE ADDED MANY NEW COMPUTERS WITH BOTH STATE AND LOCAL FUNDS OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS. WE NOW NEED TO EXPAND OUR NUMBER AND SELECTION OF SOFTWARE AS NEW PROGRAMS BECOME AVAILABLE. 27. NEW TEXTBOOK ADOPTION SUPPORT MATERIALS $20,000 THE STATE IS ADOPTING SEVERAL NEW TEXTBOOKS FOR NEXT YEAR AND WILL PROVIDE THE BASIC MATERIALS. WE NEED LOCAL FUNDS TO PURCHASE SUPPORT MATERIALS. 28. INCREASE TEACHER SUPPLEMENT (FROM 3% TO 48) $64,200 OUR TEACHER SUPPLEMENT IS NOW 3% OF BASE PAY FOR TENURED TEACHERS ONLY. WE WOULD LIKE TO INCREASE THAT BY 1% TO EQUAL A 4% SUPPLEMENT. PRESENTLY, OUR SUPPLEMENTS RANGE BETWEEN $598 AND $873. June 10, 1987 We the residents and property owners of the Whispering Piney development located on Old # 10 in Orange County strongly urge the Orange County Commisioners to accept in its entirety the proposed 1987-88 budget of the Orange County School Board. We feel education should be a top priority in the county and that the budget cuts recommended by the County Manager would be detrimental to the education of our children. We ask that you, our elected officials, give the schools the money they need to carry out their important purpose. Thank you 2-0.44 ' ,`e_ el X'6- 4i Ar i�a�n, fu_e . A7� x'37 ' ' P (- , t 13( -\ N.Q- — �77v p , ecie,4 Po 4-6;419.._L)olial.t.) u, ,z,,, e '7 ©s q 33 ` ► e.; ),-;,- L. , . `��jr (A.C. 0,71704-- 4,e Ai ,/ � �J�p . x/� �l�i�r_.__4 ) we- ?7o f- 9 , ,.= , eft/, 4-9 tv-A,;),6fAvvfri'l 9.44■4,...., CG:de If6. 4 OM. (I.J. a-oth, ..LL 4.9.„..?„,...,,_ .2,. (, ar/) titiiii4 4 Zig /.71 r-17.4ciL,?,,r,kgi „ Itlialte.atii, h, e, Algle O o 0 ia r ; l =j. tic_ • 0 7705 1,,,,,?- r— %i �r Pd74:24- . Lga-te,,,L-, 56 dZ Lel G- e AM( IVN I 1 Cle6°E ,DoRki J,4J 2 7 05 June 10, 1987 We the residents and property owners of the Whispering Pines development located on Old # 10 in Orange Count, strongly urge the Orange County Commisionersto accept in its entirety the proposed 1987_88 budget of the Orange County School Hoard. We feel education should be a top priority in the county and that the budget cuts recommended by the County Manager would be detrimental to the education of our children. We ask that you, our elected officials, give the schools the money they need to carry out their important purpose. �j Thank you j , 'Gzk 1 e„--)00 ...—"S'VdJc1 .ZLCab Ra ' aF7k) 4a 4,74/10/1 .e- „4.,6764-7=?; ,e, 2 77aa...— 14, D E S I G N C O N S T R U C T I O N June 22, 1987 Orange County Board of Commissioners 106 B Margaret Lane Hillsborough, NC 27278 Dear Commissioners: As a concerned supporter of education, I urge you to approve an appropriate level of funding to continue the level of excellence which has been achieved in the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City School System. The recommendation to improve the teacher salary supplement schedule is needed to retain and continue to attract excellent teachers in this community, as well as to remain competitive with other surrounding school systems. Si 1 erely, / 44,-- , „, •,,,, Carol Ann If President Cazwell, Inc. CAZ/sw cc: Gerry House Cazwell Inc. PO Drawer 3758 12 The Courtyard Chapel Hill NC 27515 919/942-3691 PrerrAi 7E' CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO CITY SCHOOLS LINCOLN CENTER,MERRITT MILL ROAD CHAPEL HILL,NORTH CAROLINA 27514 Telephone: (919) 967-8211 March 20, 1987 Ms. Shirley Marshall, Chairman Orange County Commissioners 106 E. Margaret Lane Hillsborough, NC 27278 Dear Ms. Marshall: I am pleased to send you the enclosed position paper from the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools Health Committee. The paper concerns the funding of the much needed position of the dental resident. Thank you. Sincerely, Susan Spelt Health Coordinator /rp Enclosure f POSITION PAPER: DENTAL HEALTH CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO CITY SCHOOLS HEALTH COMMITTEE The Chapel Hill-Carrboro School Health Committee has recently learned that because of federal budget cuts at North Carolina Memorial Hospital, many residency programs are being cut. The General Practice Residency Program at the Hospital Dental Clinic has been cut by one resident effective July 1, 1987. One more resident's position will be eliminated July 1, 1988. It has been decided to handle the cuts by deleting the resident's services from the Orange County Health Department effective July 1, 1987 and cutting one resident's services from the hospital effective July 1, 1988. The impact of the cut to Orange County, Health Department would be devastating to the dental health of county residents utilizing this service. It would eliminate the possibiity of preventive dental care for a significant segment of our population. In the 1985-86 fiscal year 643 new patients were seen in the Orange County Health Department dental clinics. Dental treatment visits numbered 4,847. Not only would the dental resident no longer provide care at the health department, but the attending dentists from the UNC School of Dentistry/NCMH would no longer be available. This impacts even further since dental students and dental auxiliary students could no longer rotate through the Orange County Health Department dental clinics without an atttending dentist on site. In order for the county to continue providing dental care at the Orange County Health Department it would have to assume financial responsibility for one resident. The annual cost would be approximately $25,000.00 to $29,000.00. The North Carolina Memorial Hospital made possible the grant to institute the program that set up the dental facilities at the Orange County Health Department sites in 1980. When grant funding ended in 1983, North Carolina Memorial Hospital continued to fund the residency program. The Chapel Hill-Carrboro School Health Committee feels it is essential that dental services be continued at the Orange County Health Department. We support your efforts to attain this goal. /rp p. 4ieli/76 MEG KEMPER, PH. D. PSYCHOLOGIST SuIrE 412 604 GREEN VALLEY ROAD GREENSBORO,NORTH CAROLINA 27408 (919)299-9704 April 20, 1987 Shirley Marshall, Chair Orange County Commissioners 707 East Franklin St, Chapel Hill, N. C. 27514 Dear Ms. Marshall; As a member of the board of the Orange County Rape Crisis Center, I am writing to ask for your support of the center' s upcoming budget request to Orange County. The center offers a full range of services to victims of rape and sexual assault as well as providing community education programs on rape/sexual assault and child sexual abuse awareness and prevention, As a psychologist and psychotherapist, I am acutely aware of the scars left behind by sexual abuse and assault and the importance of immediate services for victims and their families. The staff and volunteers of the Rape Crisis Center have impressed me with their expertise and dedication. The center provides a wide array of services to the community for a small dollar figure because of the hard work of unpaid volunteers. However, to continue to deliver these victim services and community education the center needs funding to continue to attract competent professional staff who train and supervise the volunteers as well as community human services providers (e. g, police, medical personnel, mental health providers, social service workers, school staff, etc. ) , The Orange County Rape Crisis Center has earned a reputation as a top notch center throughout the state and has been used as a model in other locales. Please vote to continue funding the Orange County Rape Crisis Center which provides such excellent services for all Orange County residents. Your thoughtful consideration of my request would be greatly appreciated. Sine, rely, Meg emper,,p , D. a TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL DISTRIBUTED 306 NORTH COLUMBIA STREET CHAPEL HILL,NORTH CAROLINA 27514 OFFICE OF THE MAYOR TELEPHONE(919)968-2714 March 25, 1987 Mrs. Shirley Marshall , Chair Orange County Board of Commissioners 106 Margaret Lane Chapel Hill , NC 27514 Dear Shirley: On Monday, March 23rd, 1987,. the Town Council adopted the enclosed resolution. We are again requesting that the Board of County Commiss- ioners continue to support both our Parks and Recreation program and our Library services by continued assistance in the funding of both programs. _ The Council is appreciative for the County's financial support in past years. It allows us to provide further service to County resi- dents and we respectfully request that the County's funding will reflect the ratio of County residents' participation in all of the programs available to them. A formal presentation will be forthcoming at a budget hearing during the deliberations by the Commissioners. Please advise us of a date and time when a hearing is scheduled. Sig , t dam--41 a lace Ma:Members Members of C it Town Manager AGENDA #15b MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Council FROM: David R. Taylor, Town Manager SUBJECT: Request to the Orange County Board of Commissioners for Library and Parks and Recreation Funds for 1987-88 DATE: March 23, 1987 The attached resolution requests continued funding for municipal Library and Parks and Recreation services from Orange County. Background Orange County has provided support funding to the Chapel Hill Public Library since 1962-63. In the current year, the County appropriated $131,040 (approximately 20% of the Library budget) for municipal Library services. This dollar amount and percentage of department budget was consistent with the number of users who live within Orange County, but outside the corporate limits of Chapel Hill. Support funding for Town Parks and Recreation services began in 1976-77. The present dollar amount of funding ($61,600 presently representing 6% of the department budget) has remained unchanged since 1980-81. Discussion Because the County assists with funding of municipal Library and Parks and Recreation services, these Town services are available to non-Chapel Hill residents who live within Orange County on the same basis as services to Town residents. The County places no restrictions on the use of support funding other than funding be used for general library and parks and recreational services. A survey of 1,161 users of the Public Library from March 4 - 8 showed 277 or 24% of users reside outside of Chapel Hill, but within Orange County. Six percent (74) live outside of Chapel Hill and Orange County. A review of 2,513 recreation program registrants for the six-month period of January 1 to June 30, 1986 revealed 720 or 29% of registrants resided outside the Town but within the County (5% were not Chapel Hill/Orange County residents) . Conclusion We believe the level of funding for Library and Parks and Recrea- tion services from Orange County should be increased to reflect 2 the percentage of Orange County residents living outside of Chapel Hill who use these Town services. Using the preliminary expenditure projections for the 1987-88 year as presented in the Manager's Interim Budget Report of March 9, County funding for 1987-88 Public Library services would total $168,522 (24% of $702,178) . County funding of 29% of the Parks and Recreation Department budget would total $327,128 (29% of $1,128,097) . Recommendation: That the Council adopt the following resolution and authorize the Mayor and Manager to present this request to the Orange County Board of Commissioners at the appropriate County budget hearing. • A RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR AND REQUESTING CONTINUATION OF FUNDING BY ORANGE COUNTY FOR MUNICIPAL LIBRARY AND PARKS AND RECREATION SERVICES (87-3-23/R-14) WHEREAS, the Orange County Board of Commissioners has appropriat- ed funds for several years to support municipal Library and Parks and Recreation services in southern Orange County in a spirit of cooperation between the County and the Town of Chapel Hill; and WHEREAS, the Town's Library and Parks and Recreation services are available to residents of Orange County who do not live in Chapel Hill on the same basis as for Town residents; and WHEREAS, the Town Council of Chapel Hill believes the policy of municipal support funding by the Orange County Board of Commis- sioners is commendable; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council hereby expresses its appreciation for its policy of financial support of Chapel Hill Library and Parks and Recreation services; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Council requests County funding in 1987-88 in the amount of 24% ($168,522) of the budget of the Town's Library and 29% ($327,128) of the Chapel Hill Parks and Recreation Department budget, these percentages representing the percentage of non-Chapel Hill, Orange County residents using Town Library and Parks and Recreation services; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and Town Manager of the Town of Chapel Hill are authorized to transmit and formally present the request of the Town of Chapel Hill for municipal support funding to the Orange County Board of Commissioners at the appropriate County budget hearing. This the 23rd day of March, 1987. Z 17 Orange County Literacy Council, Inc. • P.O.Box 34,Carrboro, NC 27510 John Hartwell Executive Board Orange County Commissioner Susan tter eier 106 E. Margaret Lane George Gamble Hillsborough, NC 27270 Mike Meyer June 24, 1 987 Mary Ann Steele Dear John; I write to you on behalf of the Orange County Literacy Council Board to bring two concerns to your attention regarding our request for funds from the County this year. The first concern is that the Manager recommended that the Literacy Council receive no funding from the County this gear. Our second concern was that no rationale or policy statement was provided to help us and others understand why it was recommended that the County provide no support to the Literacy Council. this budget recommendation reflect the County Commissioners' policy regarding adult illiteracy in the County? fire you not concerned that there are over 5,000 functionally illiterate adults in Orange County. It is my belief that you and all the other Commisioners are _floes oncerned with this problem and further that you do recognize the nique and valuable service provided by the Literacy Council. We are he only organization in the County providing one-on-one tutoring to hese illiterate adults. In 1986 Literacy Council tutors volunteered ver 10,000 hours to help these adults learn to read. f indeed you do believe that adult illiteracy is an important problem Orange County and that the Literacy Council is providing a orthwhile service, we ask that you consider lending some financial upport to our work. We requested $1500. from you, which represents bout 4% of our annual budget. We can do a great deal with olunteers alone but the value of our work greatly increases when we have the moral and financial support of local government. Cast a vote for non-reading adults in Orange County. Since ely, • • George R. Ga ble Laubach Literacy Action FACw oqF TEACw OwE U.S. Program of Laubach Literacy International ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY aps 1 0 8 1 A I R P O R T ROAD • CHAPEL HILL. NORTH C A R O L I N A 2 7 5 1 4 TELEPHONE 919-967-7383 June 5, 1987 Orange County Commission 106 Margaret Lane Hillsborough. NC 27278 Dear Ms Marshall and Messrs Carey, Willhoit, Hartwell and Halkiotis, I just heard that Mr Thompson has recommended $109,250 for operation of the animal shelter during FY 87-88. Since it will take $180,504 to run the shelter during that period [my calculations show that] Friday evening, February 5, 1988 at 9:59 the shelter will cease operation for the remainder of the fiscal year. What do you propose to do from February 6 through June 30? Even if the Animal Protection Society were able to make a cash contribution to Orange County in the sum of $39,670, as it did last year, the shelter would still have to close its doors on the 26th of April. Mr Thompson suggested in no uncertain terms to me in the Commissioners Room in Hillsborough on May 27th that the APS was pledged (obligated?) to support shelter operations to the tune of unspecified tens of thousands of dollars annually. As I stated to Mr Thompson at that time, I find two things wrong with that proposition. One is purely practical and the other is somewhat more philosophical . 1 . As a practical matter the APS has found itself in a deficit fiscal fix because during the past year, not only has every nickel of Society income gone into shelter operations, but also the Society has had to dip into its savings account. Even Mr Thompson ought to be able to see that when the balance in the Society's bank account drops to zero, not only does it go out of existence, but also its entire enterprise, including shelter operation, goes out of existence. Only the federal government can get away with that sort of management indefinitely. You and I, the APS, and Orange County cannot. 2. My other concern has to do with the apparently persistent notion in the minds of some persons that ordinary county services, i .e. , operation of the county animal shelter, should be directly subsidized by private citizens, i.e. , the APS. Are ACO's and building inspectors volunteer workers? Does the County Health Department run fund-raisers to support its operation? Giving the matter a little thought I'm sure you will come to the same conclusion as we that the county couldn 't hope to deliver the services provided through the shelter as it is operated by the APS for the requested budget, much less for the $109,250 suggested by Mr Thompson. Advantages to the county of the operation of the shelter by the APS are many indeed: 1 . The APS provides the shelter with volunteer workers in addition to paid staff. The estimate for this year is 3000 hr. That 's $15,000 worth of work by dedicated and caring people, and very often the nastiest kind of scut work at that. 2. The APS attracts to the shelter donations of many kinds, animal food, professional services, cages and other equipment, computers and computer services. The list goes on and on. 3. The good will that is generated by the APS through its shelter operations (as well as other APS activities that it would like to expand if it had the time and money) is immeasurable. Trees, green places, children and animals have a special meaning for the people of Orange County. How we treat them reflects back on the leadership of Orange County, for good and for bad. I've prepared two graphs to illustrate the steady increase in admissions to the shelter that has been occurring since 1980. The upper one shows actual numbers and the lower one shows the cumulative percentage, a 43% increase since 1980! Imagine what another 5-10 years will bring. Finally, please have a look at Appendix F, the weekly work schedule. Look at the 6 day per week positions that are being paid at a 5-day rate. Look at the Manager and Executive Director schedules, 7 days per week! This is accurate. I can personally vouch for it. How long will it be before we burn everybody out? We need at least one new position (the Assistant Manager, Appendix E). We need decent pay for everyone. Our personnel turnover is much too high, due in no small part to the low wages. What county employees would work 6-7 days per week for these wages? In addition to the new position, we have certain vacancies to be filled which is causing an unconscionable squeeze on our people. Our funding is so uncertain that we can 't do any hiring to help to alleviate the problem. And now we have the threat of massive, relative cuts against which private citizens like me are having to go out and lobby you, the County Commissioners. Ms Marshall and Messrs Carey. Willhoit, Hartwell , and Halkiotis, PLEASE ACCEPT THIS BARE BONES BUDGET FOR OPERATION OF THE ANIMAL SHELTER. A failure to do so would carry with it serious implications for both the people of Orange County and the county and municipal fiscal administrators. Yolf uly, Ethard W. Van Stee, DVM, PhD President ORANGE CT( APS Adrniunions, 1980-1986 7 6 103 \ 5 ,s, ,,,4 , a ,,,,,,1 oc 4 l'i % @ 'n Ft 3 1111S111140 3 c 2 \ \h./ \444 1 p ih L ilL1111111111°4 IL Mk I. ■ 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 years TOTAL ADMISSIONS ORANGE ClY APS Adnieeione, 1980-1986 45 40 - 35 - 30 - u 25 - 0a 15 - 1 it,,,,, 10 5 - 0 —�_ " u1i 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 Years 17V Cumulative% Incr APPENDIX F ja,el ffrc-010' i / i ■0„.latm,qt_-\--eitimuo_szp, .9:44. _ d * fil i ti _._,,, __.._„, „... _ • .. , , .. . .„ r�� �.�CC. r 'C �,� f3aQs * ;et..,-2.. .t.„.. i. 1P .P-510 p );1 g , cii. = 5 x V 5ti if ? tt-Irtitl t \ H- P4,---1 ; - I , K * 0 ,t * P of ,r-owof ft V 0 1 P v 4 gi .- 1.t, Rc ka . 14 -* g ; p oico gio -41 t-p V 7 544et t r ine, -t der 0-$ ? i, 0 Ewsmitoeievim_i_ y_ i /r In 5 lc, ii 0 ri, r°5 (41 r „lit„im,1„a: ,t,t _,mcli .,til,1„,„.\ .ft ; r , . 1 v lc .; t '',„, „.s. v APPENDIX E FISCAL YEAR 19S7—SS _ 19S6—S7 9S7—SS PERCENT INC. + EXECUTIVE DIRE_TC!F $22.000 $24.20c 10•i +*M NASER 16.5°0 i0 ,C!CICI 21% +*A . ISTANT MANAGER (nanfund. 15,500 l 00;. (TITLE MAY EE SCJFER•u1. C1F• .-.. BOOKKEEPER (HALF—TIME: . . e�.500 ?.SI co 12': `, + ADMIN1t.TRATI'..IE S'=;1- 11 .500 11 .500 0 ' '.1 **KENNEL TECH T 14.500 14.500 0 \� KENNEL TECH : 1 �) 1 :! .4C-0 1 3.CIO0 21:. (CHANGE TO —DA SAL .:. **HEALTH CARE TECHNIilAr'; 14.500 14.50!0! Cl WEEKEN r KENNEL TECH I I . . tc S' � _ 12'•. 'EMERGENC) WORKERS = ,E.cr, 2.S50 14 WEED E REEF`—FEF: C. .1 r�= ∎ 100% (4.[s He= 41k Ai $4 .50 'HF , . • MERIT r !II-, rr C�1 11FJEr - ,C : 0 i srRiBvTg /8.044.0 --- ,y ?4 f & - ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY 1081 AIRPORT ROAD •• CHAPEL HILL. NORTH CAROLINA 27514 TELEPHONE 919-967-7383 Shirley Marshall, Chair Board of Commissioners 106 E. Margaret Lane Hillsborough, NC Dear Ms. Marshall: On May 27th Dr. E.W. Van Stee and I had a very unsatisfactory meeting with the County Manager, Ken Thompson. I was under the inpression that the meeting was to discuss the Shelter budget needs; however, Mr. Thompson expressed himself in a strongly accusatory posture, stating that the APS and the County had disagreements on two fronts, and that we have not been cooperative 1) in providing documenta- tion about concerns the APS had about Animal Control, and 2) that we had not, "after being asked repeatedly to do so" returned the budget forms and information requested. 1. Providing documentation_about concerns the APS had about Animal Control. I told Mr. Thompson that the APS, and I personally, feel that the Task Force ad- dressed solutions to the problems we perceive with Animal Control. 2. The APS had not after being asked repeatedly to do so returned budget forms and information and refused to do so." The form he referred to is the "OC Non- Departmental Application for Contribution, Fiscal Year 1987-88." I told Mr. Thompson a) that APS had never returned that form since we contract with the County to run an integral service for the County, that the "fit" of the form did not seem to work with the Shelter, and that we had instead attempted to provide a thorough budget request reflecting what APS considered the most thorough and suitable information about Shelter operations; and b) that I had not been asked to return the form. Mr. Thompson persisted, insisting that APS had always returned it and I had been asked repeatedly to do so. At that point I asked to see a copy of one of the forms previously sent to the County, and Mr. Thompson sent Mr. Kittrell to the files to retrieve one. Mr. Kittrell returned: There was no form on file (since we had never sent one in). I also restated that I had not been asked to send the form in. Mr. Thompson asked Mr. Kittrell at this point if I had been asked to do so, and Mr. Kittrell said that he had only sent it in the mail and had not asked me for it. I then interjected that Mr. Kittrell had, however, asked me for demographic information on the animals impounded since 1979 and wanted me to compile this information. It is my understanding that Mr. Kittrell wanted this information for background data and not for any budgetary plans at this time. I told him I did not have the time, but that I would at the earliest possible time collect the reports for all months since the Shelter opened in 1979 and provide those to him. I did this, on my own time, spending an evening xeroxing the materials at Kinko's. (They have not yet picked up from the Shelter.) 1 I explained again the APS position--that we had both publicly and privately stated that the APS could no longer finance Shelter operations, including clear statements at the budget hearings last year and in private conversations since. Mr. Thompson responded "People say anything at public meetings." Frankly, I was appalled at this statement and told him that I did not say anything in public that I did not mean and that I did not believe in, and that it is my sincere opinion that no one on the APS Board of Directors did so either. Thompson said that the APS had committed itself to funding the Shelter. He also said he had not been notified that the Society was going to withdraw, and that indeed the APS could not withdraw from this obligation. I referred him to the cover letter to the Shelter budget request, submitted April 6, 1987 (See Attachment 1). Mr. Thompson then challenged my authority to relay this information to him. I stated the budget decisions were not mine, although I fully support them, but that the decisions were made by the Board of Directors, and that I was directed to proceed under their instructions. He then challenged, I guess, my credibility, and Dr. Van Stee at that point told Mr. Thompson that he was present at the Board Meeting when the decisions were made, and that it was voted upon and in our minutes. At that point Mr. Thompson said he would have to talk to the Board. I offered to set up a meeting and he decided that he didn't have time. He also asked for a Shelter audit and an APS audit "so I can determine if the Society can afford to continue or not." I advised him that the APS would provide an audit of Shelter funds as quickly as possible, but that it was not proper for Mr. Thompson to ask for an audit of APS funds, and that decisions about the APS use of funds were made by the APS Board of Directors only. When I was explaining the need for the increased budget (which I had assumed originally was the purpose of the meeting), Mr. Thompson made what I consider irresponsible suggestions. When I told him how understaffed the Shelter was and the hours that staff worked, and that we could not expect them to continue on like this, his response was, "Well, if they quit you can just hire someone else." I can't imagine anyone in a management position would take such an outrageous pos- ture. Turnover has caused us to spend many hours training new staff that could have been used in other areas. Along with a very cryptic view of managment, it's also an inhumane way to treat personnel, implying that if employees won't work long hours without reasonable compensation, the Shelter should just hire someone else. If you sense an air of frustration in this letter, let me assure you that you are right. Mr. Kittrell called this morning to say that the Shelter will be funded for $109,250; our request from the County is $180,504. The APS can't run the Shelter on this budget. Sincerely, Pat Sanford Executive Director June 5, 1987 cc: APS Board of Directors 2 bd.hikr 'if1'I,47 94• m 9i re- _1171.) THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL Department of Dental Ecology The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Administrative Office(919)966-2787 Schonl of Dentistry 2091-1 AHEC,Community Dentistry&Behavioral Sciences 966-2787 Chapel Hill,N.C.27514 Hospital Dental Service 966.2792 Caries Research 966.5727 Oral Facial and Communicative Disorders 966-2275 Dental Auxiliary Programs 966-2800 Dental Assisting Program 966-2802 April 3, 1987 Dr. Eugene F. Howden 1717 Legion Road Chapel Hill, N.C. 27514 Dear Dr. Howden: I am writing to ask for your support of funds to continue maintenance of Orange County's health department clinics. The discontinuance of the clinics would have a devastating effect on the dental health of our county's school children. Specifically, the county's dental health screening and referral program would be adversely effected. As you know, every year the children in both school systems are screened and referred for obvious dental problems. Most of the children who cannot afford dental care are referred and treated at the health department clinics. Last year 522 children were identified as needing care. Many of these children (especially in Northern Orange County) had no where else to go but the health department clinics. Without the clinics, many children would have no access to dental care. Please support the coninuance of the health department clinics. Thank you for your consideration in this regard. Sincerely, Jan Carlton Holland, R.D.H., M.S. JCH:sc cc: Mr. Ken Thompson, County Manager Ms. Shirley Marshall, County Commissioners Chair t94va '` ip ic-IE %o r 22 igtr -�"o -04Li Sandy Hoyle Bolick 843 ShadyLawn Road Chapel Hill, N.C. 27514 942-7367 May 11, 1987 Dear - As you know, I addressed the May 4, 1987, board meeting on the topic of the Enrichment Resource program offered to 3rd and 4th graders. My particular concern is the school system's failure to refer and evaluate these students for possible formal identification as "academically gifted." I believe that our school system•can prdvide all students with a better opportunity to qualify for the rights and services available to those who meet the state's "academically gifted" criteria by using the state's two-step process for formal identification. I believe our system can provide this opportunity through formal identification and simultaneously continue to offer an opportunity, through spending local money, for students who might not meet state AG criteria to participate in our system's special services for the academically gifted. I believe statements made to the contrary are invalid and iii the following pages I believe I have shown why. In addition to my comments, I have included for board members copies of information from the State Department of Public Instruction regarding the formal identification of the academically gifted. Also included is our system's description of the 3rd-4th grade Enrichment Resource Program, provided to me by Nathalie Harrison. In preparing this information, I have talked extensively with Gail Smith, chief consultant for academically gifted programs with the SDPI Division for Exceptional Children. Her phone number is 919/733-3004. I encourage you to call her with your own questions. I also hope you will talk not only with your administrative staff, but also with the board's attorney, as you seek to determine all implications of formal identification. Should you have any questions of me, or wish to discuss further any issue concerning formal identification, I hope you will contact me. Thank you so much for taking the time to review my concerns. Sincerely, Sandy Hoyle Bolick cc: Sue Baker Phyllis Lotchin Gerry House Ted Parrish Edith Wiggins Michael Radz Fred Battle Bonnie Knoke Nathalie Harrison Carolyn Horn First, test if goal "A" is met, since the board's first responsibility is to meet legal mandates. Consider the following: ** Why is this program entitled "Enrichment Resource" and why does our school system not seek to formally identify any of the students in the program as "academically gifted." Try to thoroughly and accurately answer the above by keeping in mind additional relevant points and asking additional relevant questions, including: * This "Enrichment Resource" program,is a part of this school system's overall "Three Tier Model for the Academically Gifted." * Under state law, students who meet specific criteria (established by the State Department of Public Instruction) are considered "academically gifted" and are therefore entitled under state law to certain rights within the public education system and to certain state funds. (It is acknowledged here that caps on N.C. General Assembly funding mean state money is not always provided for every identified child, but that the state requires these identified children be provided esecial services regardless. Therefore it may become necessary for local school systems to provide these services with local funds, and in fact that is necessary in the Chapel Hill-Carrboro school system.) * CONVERSELY, under state law, UNTIL a student is formally identified as qualified for special services (in this case as "academically gifted") , a student is NOT entitled under state law to any special rights or services or any state funding for "special services," and the local school system is NOT legally obligated to provide any special services. (This is the state's safeguard against misuse of state money.) What this means locally is that even if the state removed its funding caps and allowed local systems to receive money for every identified academi- cally gifted child, our system couldn't qualify for a penny for our third and fourth-graders until those students were formally identified and reported to the state. It also means that this system can't spend whatever state money for which it now (or in-the future) qualifies on the 3rd-4th grade program because those children are not formally identified and reported to the state. This doesn't suggest we are presently misusing any funds because it is obvious that the present funding caps and the number of "academically gifted" students identified in the system enable this system to spend state funds in grades higher than 3rd & 4th. Interestingly, some other local school systems (and finance Director Waynes Watts says the Orange County School System is an example) , go ahead The state is clear regarding the two-step identification process. Screening comes first, and regarding screening the state says, "Initial screening of the pool will determine students for whom formal referrals will be made." Within these rules, the state goes on to include suggestions which serve to clarify what the state expects screening to accomplish. I believe there is little doubt that rules on screening were written to show that screening is intended to establish a pool of students significantly larger than just those students who automatically meet state criteria on the basis of standardized group test scores. Otherwise, the screening pool would serve little purpose. I believe there are some very sound legal and moral reasons why school systems are advised by SDPI regarding screening that, "Sufficient data should be gathered to justify the need for referral, to document non-discriminatory screening, and to substantiate the professional judgment that a referral is not needed at this time." By allowing the current 3rd-4th program to use something less than the state's required two-step identification process, this board automatically gives parents and all taxpayers cause to question whether the school system has anything to gain, and whether students, parents and others have anything to lose. The board sets the stage for: - Parents of AG students to question whether the current program truly does represent the special services to which their children are entitled. Can the program withstand challenges about meeting the "appropriate needs" of these students? - Parents of minority or disadvantaged students to question if they were EXcluded from the opportunity of formal identification, because only standardized group test scores were reviewed. - Taxpayers in general to question why you describe this program as one which you must provide because state law requires it, when, in fact, the'ktudents served in the program aren't ENTITLED to it yet. * The list could go on and on. And additional questions surface as you move on to examine whether the second goal of this Enrichment Resource program is accomplished. It was my understanding that the board, in recognizing the pitfalls of systemwide, standardized group testing, sought a method of finding "gifted" students who might be overlooked in lists of these test results. I thought the board was attempting to find these students and make up for the deficiencies it recognized in our group testing by going ahead and placing these students in the program. But I am not convinced this has been accomplished in the present program design. I believe there are many students, especially minorities and disadvantaged, who not only would be included in the program but who would be included by virtue of formal identification under state AG criteria if only the system used the two-step screening and evaluation process. If the two-step process was used, and a large pool of students was established through screening specifically designed to "catch" students with test score and performance discrepancies, the board's goal probably could be better met. That the goal had been met (or to what degree) certainly could be better measured. By failing to use the two-step screening and evaluation process, the board has foregone the state's built-in safeguards which protect students. Minority and disadvantaged "academically gifted" students may stand the most to gain ffom=-this'-protection• and I don't believe that is any accident. By the same token, it is these students who may stand to-lose the most when the double-safeguards aren't in place. The state's two-step process provides parents who feel the system has failed to evaluate "their child the opportunity to initiate the evaluation. Conversely, it allows the pycstem to initiate referral on behalf of the student whose parent is unlikely to do so. It provides due process for either the system or the parent in challenging evaluation criteria or in performing the evaluation. Parents could challenge biased or inappropriate testing; the system might challenge a parent's arbitrary refusal to give permission for evaluation. Ultimately, the formally-identified child winds up with the means (a Group Education Plan) for both parent and system to look concretely at what is being provided to appropriately meet the student's special needs. Through formal identification, this system is likely to find it has more minority and disadvantaged students who meet state AG criteria than it now realizes. Still, the system's only limit on continuing its present, or some other form, of "revolving door" program that allows other_ students into the program is the amount of money available to spend. The state puts limits on state money, not local money. The state does not say you can't spend local funds to serve more students than it requires you to serve. I -3 Appendix A Definition and Identification of Academically Gifted Students Division for Exceptional Children State Department of Public Instruction Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-1712 January 1, 1985 Definition Academically gifted students are defined as those who demonstrate or have the potential to demonstrate outstanding intellectual aptitude and specific academic ability. In order to develop their abilities, these students may require differentiated educational services beyond those ordinarily provided by the regular school program. Rules, .1501, (a), (2) Special Identification Procedures To determine a student's eligibility for the academically gifted program, two steps are required: screening and evaluation. Screening Local education agencies shall develop a local screening procedure in order to establish a pool of students who are possibly qualified for and in need of differentiated instruction. Initial screening of the pool will determine students for whom formal referrals will be made. Suggested screening procedures may include checklists/behavioral scales of characteristics of the gifted; scores obtained on system-wide standardized tests of intelligence and/or achievement; teacher/parent/peer/self nomination; scores obtained on screening instruments; and a listing of students from high, middle, and low income levels who have demonstrated outstanding ability in the classroom, school or community. Rules, .1509, (1) (a) Requiring the development of a local screening procedure will help ensure system-wide consistency and effectiveness in seeking out those students who are possibly qualified for the'academically gifted program. The screening procedure can be tailored to the particular characteristics of the overall school population and/or specific grade levels (e.g., primary, elementary, secondary). Sufficient data should be gathered to justify the need for referral , to document non-discriminatory screening, and to substantiate the professional judgement that a referral is not needed at this time. Screening procedures may include but dre not limited to: . checklists/behavioral scales of characteristics of the gifted Such os the Renzulli-Hartman Scale, the Weiss-Guilford Teacher Rating Scale, the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Checklist, or the Buncombe Behavioral Characteristics Scale; . composite or subtest percentile scores obtained on system-wide or statewide tests of intelligence and/or achievement; . teacher, parent, peer and/or achievement; . percentile scores obtained on other standardized screening instruments such as the, PIAT, WRAT, Slosson, or Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test; . a listing of students who demonstrate outstanding ability in the classroom, school , or community such as leadership, motivation, task commitment. Evaluation Identification shall be based on an assessment of intelligence or aptitude test scores, standardized achievement test scores and student performance based on grades, demonstrated skills or products. Students earning 98 or more points on IQ/aptitude and achievement percentiles or on IQ/aptitude and achievement percentiles plus scholastic performance are eligible to be considered by the School-based and Administrative Placement Committees for the academically gifted program. Rules, .1509, (1), (b) Standardized IQ/aptitude and achievement test score percentiles are the -focus of identification and carry an equal weight of 50 points each. When student performance is also used, it carries a maximum weight of 10 points. (i) IQ/Aptitude (50 point maximum): individual or group tests may be used. A list of recommended tests is available in the Division for Exceptional Children. Scores are to be converted to percentiles, and each percentile has a point value. (ii) Achievement (50 point maximum): composite or total reading/total math subtests may be used. Scores are to be converted to percentiles, and each percentile has a point value. (iii) Scholastic Performance (10 point maximum): for students earning fewer than 98 points on IQ/aptitude and achievement test scores, scholastic performance shall be considered. A maximum of 10 points shall be added to points earned on IQ/aptitude and achievement based on the accompanying scale for overall academic average, specific subject area grades or documentation of outstanding skills or abilities (e.g. , writing portfolios, science projects, etc.). f ,rr►,e-r ,tandardized testing shall be completed ard the scores user in determining eligibility. Rules, .1509, (d) Providing specific examples of conditions which merit further testing-- usually individualized testing--will encourage local education agencies to be alert for potential in culturally disadvantaged, minority, underachieving and handicapped students. Reevaluation Appropriate in-depth reevaluations of exceptional children must be w completed at least every three years in order to determine the ,appropriateness of current educational status of students and to determine whether or not a student continues in or exits from a special education program. The date by which reevaluations must occur is determined by the date placement was made. Although each test does not have to be administered exactly three years from the date it was previously given, all tests must be completed prior to the time the committee reviews the placement decision. That review must be within three years of the time the last placement decision was made. The reevaluations shall include the types of screening and evaluations in Section .1510 required prior to the initial placement. Parent approval is not required prior to the reevaluation. The parent(s) must be notified in writing that the child is being reevaluated and the notice must meet the requirements of Section .1517. If the parent objects, the due process procedures set forth in .1517 of this Section may be followed. If a child's performance/behavior warrants reevaluation before the three year period has expired, a referral for reevaluation should be made. Students who upon reevaluation no longer qualify for placement in a special education program are not to remain in the program beyond the present grading period. Rules, .1511 Annual review and reevaluation should also examine service appropriateness and student performance, especially if student performance is not satisfactory but standardized test scores remain in upper percentile levels. The local education agency is encouraged to utilize a variety of service options that best match the student's ability. For example, a student who is gifted in math will be better served in an advanced math program/class than in a "gifted" English class. Every effort should be made to match the student's area(s) of ability with appropriate service options. Attachments Idencation Matrix . Recommended Tests/Instruments CONTENT The following four units, identified by subject area are considered appropriate for grades 3 and 4; language arts, math, science, and communications. Each unit will run approximately concurrent with the 9 week grading periods for the school year. A scope and sequence chart is in place for grades 3 and 4. Variations within this framework will be dependent upon teacher interest and expertise. Enrichment topics and teaching strategies will be shared with third and fourth grade classroom teachers to encourage collaborative development and use of content with all children. ROBERT G.WINFREE CHAIRMAN Capital Health Systems Agency, Inc. MICHAEL M.RUFFIN VICE CHAIRMAN 800 NORTH MANGUM STREET•DURHAM,NORTH CAROLINA 27701•TELEPHONE 919-682-3900 NANCY M.LANE VICE CHAIRMAN SAOOIE H.GILLESPIE SECRETARY JOHN E.RAMSAY,JR. TREASURER ELMER M.JOHNSON EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR March 12, 1987 Mr. Kenneth R. Thompson County Manager, Orange County 106 E. Margaret Lane Hillsborough, N. C. 27278 Dear Mr, Thompson: Financial assistance received from Orange County over many years has helped this agency to give citizens of our area a voice in the development of the major health resources on which they must rely. I am writing to ask for continuation of the County' s support in the 1987-88 fiscal year. The current N. C. General Assembly will be considering whether sufficient funding should be included in the State's 1987-89 biennial budget to keep the Statewide network of six health systems agencies in operation. If State funds are appropriated, it is quite likely that the amount will be less than we received from the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services prior to October 1, 1986, when Federal funds were discontinued. This fact makes the allocations we receive from County governments all the more crucial to the maintenance of a staff adequate to do the job. Any additional State appropriation to the agency undoubtedly will carry with it an obligation for our full participation in the State certificate of need review program, perhaps with responsibilities beyond those we have been called upon to carry out in the past. If additional State funds are not received, there is the possibility that this agency may not exist throughout the 1987-88 fiscal year, or that if it exists without State support, its services may not be those in which the County has an interest. In that sense, this is a contingency request, with the understanding that payment would not be made if there does not exist a service program which the County chooses to help finance. Citizens supporting wise evolvement and use of health resources in counties of Health Service Area IV CHATHAM • DURHAM • FRANKLIN • GRANVILLE • JOHNSTON • LEE • ORANGE • PERSON • VANCE • WAKE • WARREN Mr. Kenneth R. Thompson March 12, 1987 Page 2 In all but one of the last ten years, the amount of our requests to the counties has been three cents per capita. This year, we are asking for support at the same rate, based on the 1985 County population, as estimated by the Office of State Budget and Management. Consequently, our 1987-88 request to Orange County is for $2,473. Please call me if additional information is needed to give you an understanding of our current situation or of our plans and prospects. I will be glad to meet with you and with the Commissioners to discuss this request. Sincerely, Elmer M. Johnson Executi e Director EMJ:dwh 2 4 9 5 29 73 3 4 73 2 same 2 3 4 7 6 1,800 + 200 7 I�v I�A S 9 so too 6; 10 rs�-, m— me 10 13 G 1 1 20— 12 12 0 0& M fK 14 3 J 1,238 4 j 1!3fl.... .. same 17 fa 94 Zci 2t1 94 2 7 0;-rT)7 C OPIV 21 2..400 2 . ...... .. + 2.. 24 �'�6 4 1 00 3 2 600 2 2 4 71 . .. . . .. . . . . 29 f N,i, A C, . . .... 120 loo 31 6 -110 4 y A,f)rjp, ... . . . . . .... . . . CA,I T N. 3 7 2-S,CA 300 33 j 2 600 ?1. .. ... + a 300 34 9 f" 2,300 same n. A 2 41 7!-_ O00.... . . s 1: j_- 2,000 same —0 same S1 52 5 54 3 2 000 4 -7 same - -: - 1 580 7 59 61 0 7:2 4 ROTE. IN a I ppropjjatgons are made in this budget for the annua report ,a for uai recept r will be appropriated from the Manager's Office. a s. 0 j 7 j q Ll E T ;7 2 J;-: T Ti 3 14 29 X7,3,5 same 4 1,600 1,800 6 .. ....... DID 7 1 0 10 0 k-1 i�� 4 12 cjfz 114"1 i C 1.im.N 2 N ... .. ..... .. ... . .. i3 1a 1C 1 416 ,238 77777�� me al 17 F S j .2.3. :a $7 4io J r cwiwl Y 3,8 9 7 4 b x 9 21 2 j j Z ... o5RO.... 2 4 2 0 0 94 '1 1 500 + 600 2 <j 0 A 120 31 7 T J,�, 2 541 2 600 34 -4 ---------- .. ... ... .. y 21 3qo. ... 2 2 '1 .30Q . same �1 7W 4 2 55 7 ,U?1000 4 CT , E IVU Ana 52 J 3 4 2,000 Jq V 2 000 4 �I-�I-� 1-:1 :-, ,, 4. e 5 7 (,f, T .. . . . . . .. . eo, 6" 8 580 7 59 9 -------------- ------------------------ 10 4:,," 153,3 NOTE: N 15 n + 5 15 or for r the annual repo 930 ,.o appropriations.are made,i this budget fo rt 2 e-VGl U will be appropriated from the Manager's office. f FORM}j� FUND DEPARTMENT r General Board of Commissioners' Office PROGRAM /DIVISION ACCOUNT CODE i0-410-14 TRIPS REQUESTED ON FORM 7A USING COUNTY-OWNED VERYCLES NMMLES COST F PER DEPT, MANAGER MILE REQUEST RECOM. Various trips 300.00 NORMAL DEPARTMENTAL USE OF MOTOR POOL 4 DUE DATE: MR01 31 1937 FbRM 7A RAVE! FUND DEPARTMENT , PAGE OF ROGRAN/DIVISION • CtOUNT CODE F TITLE NAME, LOCATION AND DATE FORM OF OF OF CONFERENCE, ACHIEN TYPE COST REGISTRATION, ROOM EMPLOYEE SCHOOL OR TRAINING EXPECTED OF TUITION' AND DEPT. TRANSPORT MANAGER BOOKS MEALS REQUEST RECOM. Board of Commissio ers NACo Annual Conf.-Calif 7/88 nformation Air- 2100 NACo Legis.Conf.-D.C. 3/88 $1,000 $ 1,575 $ 4,675 NCACC Annual Conf.-8/87 Comb 225 $1,000 887 2, 112 NCACC Conf. 12/87 Car 125 625 575 1,325 Private/Public Partnershi Car 125 625 88 ( 575 1,32$ Various travel for Board memo rpackag deal) 1 ,975 (meetings, conferences, wor shops, 2,400 legislative updates, etc.) Clerk's Office travel - meetings, etc. NACo Legislative Conf. $ 315 NA County Clerks' Conf. (2) 200 135 335 Various workshops, schools, tc. Car 65 220 270 555 470 V'1` DATE:: P"ARM 31. 1937 FORM X PR a �. a' _ 1E FUND DEPARTMENT. PROGRAM/DIVISION PAGE OF REMIT General Board of Commissione!AT Office ACGOUNT CODE ' 10-410-27 POSITION TITLE DEPT. ORGANIZATION OR PUB DEPT. MANAGER REQUEST RECOM. VIN CACC l/NACo $ 7,571.00 V' y"Orrriangle J COG (last years figure) $ 1.086.00 ✓ NCA of County Clerks $3a- 5-00 l l 5 +,act Capita! Health Systems Agency $ 35.00 League of' Women Voters $ 2:473.00 1/fnstitute of Government (same as last year) $ 150.00 VNOrth Central Piedmont R 6 D $ 2,312.00 National Assoc• of County Clerks $ 25-9--n 33'V.°O✓ Various Publications from the IOG $ 50.00 Other Publications $ 200.00 $ 400.00 All final figures have riot yet' been determined. This amount should Cover -all increases ` $ 2, 100.00 31 1987 FORM FUND DEPARTMENT �j APPROPRIATION REQUEST y PROGRA�ifDIVISION hGE Or Genera-i Board of Commissioners' Office A COUNT CODE ,10-410-70 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION CODE of DEPT. MANAGER ITEli JUSTIFICATION RE¢-VEST RECOM. 10-410-7 2 - 2 shelf book cases Expansion of office for the Commissioners and increase in activities $ 300.00 10-410`7 1 table 10-410-7 3 2 dr• rr $ 145..00 - rawefiie cabinets 10-410- S 300.00 7 1 electric typewriter rr 10-410-7 1 coat rack $ 800.00 rr $ 35.00 LL DUE DATE: [VRG9 31' 1987 ' PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS -- DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS REQUEST DEPARTMENT: Board of Commissioners II PROGRAM Same PRIORITY POSITION TITLE ORGANIZATION OR PUBLICATION REQUEST IPROFESS ONAL AFFILIATIONS: MO ORANGE COUNTY NACO 1 067 I ORANGE COUNTY �±1111111 PMMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 5 897 ORANGE COUNTY TRIANGLE J II1111111 COG 5� y_v 5- 27 740 UNTY NCA OF COUNTY CLERKS ION20 II ORANGE COUNTY 6. ORANGE COUNTY LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS 150 IORANGE COUNTY INSTITUTE OF GOVERNMENT Eff III 8. ORANGE COUNTY N. CENTRAL PIEDMONT R & D II � 250 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I - ITOTAL DUES $ 39,747 'UBSCRIP IONS: Various legislative upda.es from the I.0.G. II in 100 Directory IIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 65 II (Sine- not all the requests hay: been receive milm- in. ve d as of this date, I 5,088 II IIIIIIIMIBMMMIIIMmnl ---- e amours nee.es o IIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1 II ......1.1111.101111111111111111.111111111111111111111 TOTAL SUBSCRIPTIONS MMIIIIIIMI OTAL AMOUNT REQUESTED FOR DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS 45,000 IIIIIIIIIIII II iaIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1 Form #B-$ (2/82) 1 TRAVEL, TRATNTNG, & PROI•ESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT REQUEST Department: Board of Commissioners Program: Board of Commissioners Title of Person Transportation riority or Pro ram Activit Dates & County Pers Regis Vocation Miles Auto uto Other tration Meals Room Other Re TRAVEL: uest 1• Commissioners(5) NACO Annual Conference July/Florid air 2• NAC4 '26 1 8 5 1200 3 75 Legis. Conference 3/$5 -D.C. 640 264 875 225 675 2,039 3' TT NCACC Annual Conference 8/84-Ashv. 800 352 4, TT 625 300 600 1,877 NGACC Conference 12/84 720 164 375 344 640 1,435 5' VARIOUS CONFERENCES AND MEE INGS 6. CLERK NACO Legis. Conference 3/85 - D.C. - 659 175 45 135 355 To _ NCA Annual Conference 8 8 -Ashv. 125 60 180 365 Clerk's Conference - Na s ead 4/85 600 132 40 45 180 397 TRAIN IN 1• CLERK Administrative Course I.O.G.-- 154 150 CLERK Attend Board Meetings &Vari us other 1200 264 2b4 - 264 COMMIS3IONERS(5) Attend-Board Meetings/Conf ences, Etc. 3400 -- - -- 660 660 REQUEST FOR TRAVEL & TBATNING --�- r--_- (excluding motor pool use) 11,040 REQUEST FOR MOTOR POOL Mile equest Trips listed above using county-owned vehicle 2120 Normal Departmental use of motor pool Total request fnr ,rotor Pool use Form #B-9 (2/82) 2120