Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda - 10-06-1986
_ y ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AGENDA REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, OCTOBER 6, 1986 7: 30 P.M. SUPERIOR COURTROOM HILLSBOROUGH, N.C. A. BOARD COMMENTS B. AUDIENCE COMMENTS 1. Matters on the Printed Agenda 2 . Matters not on the Printed Agenda C. RESOLUTIONS 1. National Employ the Handicapped Week PAGE # D. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Zoning Atlas Amendments 003 a. Z-7-86 Allen. and Doris Turner (Continued from 8-25-86) 029 b. Z-8-86 Robert Faircloth and R. B. Barlow, Jr. (Continued from 8-25-86) 040 2 . Land Use Plan Amendments a. Inventory of Sites of Cultural. . .and Geological Significance (Continued from 8-25-86) 046 3 . Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments a. Article 10 Off-Street Parking and Loading (Continued from 8-25-86) Handicapped Parking Facilities b. Article 6. 21.1 Existing or New Mobile Home Parks Deletion of retro-active application of design standards and report on public safety requirements for parks 060 4 . Subdivision Regulations Amendments a. Section III-E Final Plat (Continued from 8-25- 86) Map Sheet Dimensions 063 5. Inspection Fee Schedule (Continued from 8-25-86) Map Sheet Dimensions 075 6. Fire District Boundary Change i a ?AGE # E. REPORTS 1. Audit Report 1985-86 2. Teen Networking TeamReport F. ITEMS FOR DECISION--CONSENT AGENDA (Any item may be removed for separate consideration) 080 1. Secondary Road Addition 084 2 . Change Order--Carr Building Renovation 086 3. Appraisal Services Contract. 099 4 . Proposed Budget Amendments G. ITEMS FOR DECISION 063 1. Inspection Fee Schedule 075 2. Fire District Boundary Change 101 3 . Sunset Ridge Subdivision (Preliminary Plat) 111 4. Anthony Richards (Preliminary Plat) 121 5. Grampian Hills--Section III (Preliminary Plat) 133 6. Request for Authorization to Initiate Legal Proceedings 138 7 . Cablecasting Board of Commissioners Meetings 150 8. Schedule of Values 152 9. Engineering Contract 167 10. Drainage Easement by Town of Carrboro 171 11. Tax Refunds and Release Request 182 H. APPOINTMENTS 183 I. MINUTES J. ADJOURNMENT A 001 ORANGE COUNTY Action Agenda BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Item No. Co ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT MEETING DATE OCTOBER 6, 1986 Subject: PROCLAMATION - NATIONAL EMPLOY THE HANDICAPPED WEEK Department: BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Public Hearing: Yes % no . A Y Attachments: Yes - Proclamation Information Contact: Don Willhoit Phone Numbers: 732-8181, 968-4501, 227-0231 PURPOSE: To observe National Employ the Handicapped Week in Orange County. NEED: To issue a proclamation identifying the first week of October as Employ the Handicapped Week in Orange County. The observance has three objectives: (1) To express appreciation to employers who have established outstanding programs and records of hiring people with disabilities. (2) To encourage those employers who have not hired a worker with a disability to look at the abilities, not disabilities. (3) To salute the achievements of people with disabilities who are contri- buting to their communities and to society through their jobs. RECOMMENDATION: Proclaim the week of October 5-11, 1986 as National Employ the Handicapped Week in Orange County and authorize the Chair to sign the Proclamation. 002 PROCLAMATION NATIONAL EMPLOY THE HANDICAPPED WEEK WHEREAS, physically and mentally disabled people have been tireless in seeking out employment opportunities and in overcoming vocational, economic, educational and additional barriers; and WHEREAS, disabled people have demonstrated to their employers and their community high standards of performance and dedication to their professions; and WHEREAS, disabled people aspire to equality in the work force, self-direction and self-determination in their lifestyle; and WHEREAS, employers, both public and private, can and do readily testify to the credentials and value of disabled employees; and WHEREAS, everyone has the right to employment at the highest levels of which they are capable and this right is not to be abridged by reason of physical or mental disability; and WHEREAS, despite past and present efforts of employers to hire people with disabilities, the unemployment level of disabled people continues to be unnecessarily high; NOW, THEREFORE, the Orange County Board of Commissioners do hereby proclaim the week of October 5-11, 1986 as NATIONAL EMPLOY THE HANDICAPPED WEEK in Orange County and urge public and private employers to take this opportunity to determine how the employment skills and the employment needs of disabled persons can best be utilized to further the public/private good. Don Willhoit, Chair County of Orange October 6, 1986 S E A L O R A N G E C O U N T Y BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 003. ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date OctQher 6.2 1 Action enda item SUBJECT: Z-7-86 (REZONING REQUEST) ALLEN AND DORIS TURNER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING 7-Yes No Attachment(s) Information Contact: EDDIE KIRK APPLICATION VICINITY MAP SUMMARY SHEET IMPACTS STATEMENT AGENCY COMMENTS Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham -- 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 PURPOSE: To receive public comment on a proposed rezoning request submitted by Allen and Doris Turner. NEED: Allen and Doris Turner are requesting rezoning of a 14.97 acre tract located on a gravel access road partially maintained by NCDOT. The access road connects to U.S. 70 at the southwest intersection corner of U.S. 70 and Interstate 85 in Eno Town- ship . The property is known as Lot 77 and 77A of Tax Map 25 . The property is located in an area designated Twenty Year Transition and Commercial - Industrial Transition Activity Node in the Orange County Land Use Plan. The present zoning classification of the property is Rural Residential (R-t ) . The applicant is requesting the lot be rezoned to General Commercial--4 (GC-4) . IMPACT: Approval of the request would allow development of the full range of commercial uses at this location . Properties to the east and west of the tract are zoned GC-4. Rezoning of the property would allow for the development of the site as a single commercial project or, alternatively, the subdivision of the property into individual lots for commercial development. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department recommends denial with resubmission as Planned Development. quo A / .u. 747Tk !2994 AC - - V//z2 Q 12 At 9273 45 94 ACCAL..Ooe /104 .3es 293AC.CAL. p-7 9�AC—.._I l + o 73 ` �— 4CAL. 3 i.�1* \\ 7¢a." B . ,/ \ � r 71 73 4 \ URFL r/�{lr�� I !L1.J I� f.._— 7� 6311 �\ ���` �i I V).f11 AC. �`k'� 25 2.6 14.65 1.74 AC• 5 I 50 I.IAU. � �1` a C .0041 7983 3.16 AC. fy , us NN f`/ ! 1 ``,�.� s.. � �' .,a, .�..." \ \ �-.5.;y^ .g'v�9, •�., � - ire-. .{ .., '''`wC�,!A�,dt�!&,�.., s. �' •, ~.r .'a '�� 'ie�"S+: �\ , '}:rrl_r] day. � � 1, s+y''�t:; •TC �Y:�tl1,• 'K�"��51f..i�= am a f �l; � �••'ff,�� '— r k� � \\ � i" 1.''��Y, '`•�, 'r � ra�'{� t��'' �' ��..�il]FiKSifY�y .. .'r S , .y °7��R� { y [iC ~1•• �, a� 'r .'W* s!' + .?�slvsC`rr" `S�i ices` ��. �.. �• i ,e r,V .� `i`• � ► � ck f i. - .,'� .,�. � - .r.: Mi�,• •j• '�'.'�r `, ',r .��`' y�_ �� ��''^" �.,,^.. +d+ �4r F �� �.y�. rh t �W. St.i ,h RLy.7�. ��,,yy•f�} � � � ,�c �' ': �!'ri'�ii,4t -y',�•.;,. 412 �w 3�8' �T ` ALLEN DORIS TURNER R-� @�}� S4 9• ^ $6 F.7 189, 3.23 AC.CAk.. H�� 1m, Z Q _.-4- I APPLICANT: prr1� [ nn [unnp rr I •{70 tf 15 AC, {��qA� SAC IICII GT� R. Ir flI�EE ' we \�W51 i�'T a;U1 \.J roR! m •"-hC l,`� LUPI Twenty Year Transition and N '� �.'AC. . __ - °_ 4 1s 1 Commercial/lnd�sstrial �"`""� .. Transition Activity Node 1 •`' ,•�'\,,� -7 r wIE11AAPA1G I'IgF£ Kill ��.,� f1,.A,Il,l�rt �42A 92 , Current Zoninor Residential-I ,~� 1� Ib61 23�AC i'I 4.R9`.?4 Proposed Zoning, General Commercial- �''`I,''°�. Ac, , 4 �_— (MAP "�• .. Scales 1"_ 400' A 0110. "� ��'•- [Ir3� - • ' 9 ' •...,., 7sem wti ." • MAP ?'>s�'S.-I3WA� �IA�44// R ! p'{ s W11151'CWPS) PINF1 :•;^ {{16 q'A AC r/4MlS,RI r�lwa. • ?011AC s 1 73 IAA Iy i r, I AC ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT 004 EI ate: June 16, 1986 TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA The undersigned do hereby make application to change the Zoning Atlas of Orange County as hereinafter requested . the eastbound lane of. 1 . The property is located on the south side of S.R.#U.S.,Hi,_ I Street/Road) between S.R.# J812 and S.R.# 1715 It is known as Lot(s) • 77 , ock ., of Orange County Tax Map. 25 - Eno Township. It has a frontage of 634 feet and a depth of 765 feet, and contains square feet or 14.97 acres. 2. It is desired and requested that the foregoing property - be rezoned from R-1 - to GC-4 - -S .- The foLLowing information has .be_en _.attached ._in_ support of th • application for changing the Zoning Atlas f* - required on el applications) . _ �__-- *s. A fully dimensioned map et a scale of not lass than one (11 inch - equals one–hundred (100) feet nor more than one (11 inch equals twenty r2O1 feet—Showing—the Lend match is proposed to be . rezoned. *b. A legal description of the lend proposed to be rezoned. *c. A statement of justification addressing one or more of the following: (1) The alleged error in the Zoning ordinance, if any, ehich: would be corrected by the proposed amendment eith a detailed - explanation of such error in the Zoning Atten end detailed reasons how the proposed amendment will correct the error_ • (2) The changed or changing conditions, if say, in the erns or in the County generally. which make the proposed amendment reasonably necessary to the promotion of the public health, safety and general welfare. *(3] The manner in which the proposed amendment will Carry out the intent end purpose of the adopted Lend Use Plea or part thereof. *(4) ALL other circumstances, factors and 'reeoens which the - - applicant offers in support of the proposed amendment - including, but not Limited to, documentation from service agencies [e.g. fire, police, rescue and utilities egenciesl - assuring services provision capability to the development. d. A List of ell individuals, firms or corporations owning property - adjoining or within five hundred (500) feet of the property sought for rezoning 1a attached. The List is current as of •(Data) - -I certify that all information furnished in this application is accurate to the best of my knowledge . App Li cant ( s) : Allen and Doris Turner Add rays : 5001 Raintree Rd. Durham, NC e neth :. Embree .-.. . Phone: 383-4856 Attorney for Applicant 00€ LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR USE IN APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT BY ALLEN TURNER AND DORIS J. TURNER BEGINNING at a stake located on the south side of the right-of-way for the east bound lane of US Highway #70 said stake being the northeast corner of Property of A. K. Jackson Estate as shown on a map hereinafter referred to; thence along and with the south side of said right-of-way along a clockwise curve having a radius of 2,533.57 feet a distance of 299.60 feet to a point; thence continuing with the south side of the said right-of-way along a clockwise curve having radius of 2,954.79 feet a distance of 5.43 feet to a point; thence South 42° 15' 41" West 30.00 feet to a point; thence continuing with the south side of the said right-of-way along a counterclockwise curve having a radius of 2,984.79 a distance of 329.43 feet to a point, the northwest corner of Lot #2; thence along and with the west line of Lot #2 South 26° 5' West 300.00 feet to a point, the southwest corner of Lot #2; thence along and with the south line of Lot #2 South 65° 1' 0" East 208.05 feet to a point the southeast corner of Lot #2, said point also being in the west line of property of Ken Coin; thence along and with Coin's west line South 14° 30' West 424.61 feat to a point, Coin's southwest corner; thence North 81° 28' 0" West 196.75 feet to a point, a corner of property now of formerly owner by A. K. Jackson Estate; thence along and with Jackson's north line North 65° 18' 0" West 538.38 feet to a point, a corner of property of Dorothy C. Bane; thence along and with Bane's line North 29° 38' 0" West 330.85 feet to a point; thence North 21° 23' 0" West 18.00 feet to a point, a southeast corner of A. K. Jackson Estate; thence along and with Jackson's east line North 34° 20' 20" East 765.70 feet to a point and place of BEGINNING and being a tract of land containing 14.97 Acres more or less as shown on a map entitled "PROPERTY OF GEORGE W. HONEYCUTT", by Credle Engineering Co., Inc. dated December 6, 1985, to which map reference is made for a more particular description. Reference is also -made to map entitled "PROPERTY OF GEORGE W. HONEYCUTT", by Credle Engineering Co. , Inc., dated August 6, _1985. . The area for which the change of zoning district is sought herein lies among property currently zoned General Commercial 4. In point of fact, all land which abuts the south side of the right-of-way for Interstate 85 and ffighway 70 from North Carolina Secondary Road 1812 to a point some 1200 - 1300 feet east of the subject property with the exception of a small lot immediately adjacent to the subject property is presently zoned GC-4. In addition, there is significant concentration of commercial property located on the north side of Highway 70, just across from - our property. This commercial property contains the Best Western Motel, the Latta Construction Company and a significant general commercial tract which is currently undeveloped. A copy of the Orange County. Tax Map showing this area is attached. The areas currently having the zoning designation of General Commercial 4 are shaded in yellow so that, in a graphic manner, it can be seen the extent to which General Commercial surrounds the subject property. The lot size is appropriate to the method of water supply and sewage disposal in use,. The property has a direct means of access to Highway 70 via the access road adjacent to the property to the north. From the existing zone designations of the surrounding property, the change of zoning district to General Commercial 4 from R-1 for the subject property would simply coordinate with the surrounding land use designations. ilTA .armaa: lour Mirrilkir gi* . ------ 732.-9361 ext.305 Cued Hei fine 901-9.741T 0 D g, - - rr,40-Mau. 225: XO r,arezr.Toorro Sweatt Cam.M.C- 275t0: Sar4401. • L inspected; the sewage disposal system at ` z c.e �Icf� af 1-a‘l vn Lri,w,spy Service Rcl. - iV /5T , 19 l .H4.•� 70 --agate= appeared:, to, be working property am that: date. - C_!C7 Township, Tax Map.# 25- , Block' , Lot #7 7 • e::71.))-11 ,g)-14-4/ • s 009 1.,%4111 i • STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Greensboro, NC 27429-0278 • February 5, 1986 JAMES G. MARTIN GOVERNOR DIVISION OF.HIGHWAYS JAMES E.HARRINGTON SECRETARY Mr. Eddie Kirk Planner Orange County Planning Department Hillsborough, NC 27278 • Dear Mr. Kirk: This is in reference to rezoning for Allen and Doris Turner on SR1812 adjacent to the southwest interchange of 1-85 with US7O. We would recommend one access near the-eastern boundry of property for sight distance considerations. SR1812 is a soil road. It is recommended that SR1812 be paved as a minimum between - the developer's access and existing pavement on SR1812. State maintenance on SR1812 begins at its connection with OS70 and runs westward to the bridge. The bridge is not state maintained. If we can be of any further help please advise. ` Sincerely, J. W. Watkins DIVISION ENCINEER JWW/DBK/cb cc: Mr. D. B. Kelly An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer LINDY PENDERGRASS Sheriff of Orange County Hillsborough, North Carolina, 27278 Office Phone: Hillsborough 732-2431 010 Chapel Hill 942-6300 Residence Phone 929-5535 TO: Orange County Planning Department FROM: Sheriff Pendergrass DATE: January 17, 1986 REF: Law Enforcement ;:for Proposed„Rezoning Request, Highway 70 East (Carolina Paving) The proposed zoning change on Highway:70 at Carolina Paving will have little impact on the Orange County Sheriff's Department. This is based solely on information furnished by Mr Kenneth Embree on the nature of the rezoning request. • • Orange Couni .,Suad, inc. 011 ' P' 261 S. CHURTON ST.,EXT. ors'a.«isso" , HILLSBOROUGH.NORTH CAROLINA 27278 January 16, 1986 To Whom It May Concern: Orange County Rescue Squad covers all areas of Northern Orange County including the area where Carolina Paving Company is presently located on Highway 70 and also where they are relocating on Highway - 70 about h mile west of old location. _ Orange County Rescue Squad 012 ENO FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION RT. 1, BOX 274 DURHAM, N. C. 27705 EAST ORANGE INSURANCE DISTRICT January 16, 1986 Mr. Alen Turner 5001 Raintree Rd. • Durham, North Carolina • Dear Sir The regc"iag-request you want will pose no problems for fire protection in that area. Very truly yours, R.L..R?.,segri6 Baker Chief ri • ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT IIILLSBOROUGH NORTH CAROLINA. 013 27278 • sestet' of o • . CERTIFICATE OF MAILING ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENTS ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA i , f rvtru C llIns, Zoning Officer, Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that on or about August 112. 1215A, 1 mailed, by certified mail , postage prepaid, a Notice of the Public Hearing to be held on the request h.y, A i I an And Doris Turike.r ±gt rezoning Di property iDgAted In Ena Townsh i nt n from 11.41 $AAiAentiAl t� General Commercial GC-4 to each property owner as required by Article 20, Section 20 .6.3, of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance. The notice mailed specified the date, time, place and subject of the Public Hearing on the zoning classification change. WITNESS my hand, this 15th day of August., 1986, lJ�I n , Y il��-cit?�f.W - _ Marvin Collins Zoning Officer • 014 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT BILLSBOROUGR • NORTH CAROLINA 27278 - • b��sr .r O � • • MEMORANDUM - TO: Orange County Planning Board _ FROM: Eddie Kirk, Planner II DATE: August 8, 1986 SUBJECT: Z-7-86 . GENE,t}AL INFORMATION APPLICANT: Allen and Doris Turner • 5001 Raintree Road _ - Durham, NC LOCATION: Southwest corner of the intersection of U.S 70 . and Interstate 85 in Eno Township. STATUS OF APPLICANT: Owner REQUESTED ACTION: Approval of a re-zoning request from .Rural Residential (R-1 ) to General Commercial--4 (GC-4) . PURPOSE: , To allow commercial development. LOT SIZE: 14.97 acres or 652,093.2 square feet EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant cleared land SURROUNDING LAND AND ZONING: - North - Interstate 85 and U.S. 7O Interchange - South - Greenbrier Estates subdivision zoned R--1 East -- - Small lot zoned GC-4 on 7-7-86 and. the Confederate Inn Motel zoned GC-4 West - Vacant land zoned GC-4 - Z-7-86 (REZONING REQUEST) PAGE 2 01E. LAND USE PLAN: Designated 20-Year Transition and Commer- cial- Industrial Transition Activity Node. ZONING: The property is zoned Residential-1 CR-t) and subject to the standards of the Major Transportation Corridor (MTC) overlay zoning district. • The Twenty Year Transition plan category provides for rezoning to all of the residential zoning districts (R-1 to R-13) . The Commercial- Industrial Transition Activity Node Plan Category . provides for rezoning to all of the commercial and • Industrial zoning districts. - • ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT HILLSBOROUGH NORTH CAROLINA 01 E 27278 fit tate- • MEMORANDUM TO: ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD FROM: EDDIE KIRK DATE: AUGUST 8, 1986 SUBJECT: ALLEN AND DORIS TURNER REZONING DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS WATER AND WASTEWATER SE VICES The nearest water line in the area is a 16-inch line on Highway 70 extending from Durham to the Durham Dog Kennel . The Turner property would thus be served by an individual well (s) . An 8- inch gravity sewer , line is proposed to be constructed into Orange County from Durham in the late spring or early summer of 1986. However, the line will only extend to the Intersection of U.S. 70 and. N.C. 751 . The tract will , therefore, be served by an on-site septic system. A letter has been received concerning the existing septic system. The system is functioning properly, however, no further information has been received on the - suitablity of the remainder of the site for on--site wastewater systems. - ROADSLTRAFF lC The property is located on a gravel State-maintained access road leading to U.S. 70 at the southwest intersectional corner of U.S. 70 and Interstate 85. The tract has 320 feet of road frontage on the access road, 220 feet of which is maintained by the NC Department of Transportation . (SEE VICINITY MAP) The latest traffic information is from a 1982 NC DOT traffic count. The information indicated a count of 5800 trips per day - on Highway 70 at the Durham County line. Traffic generated by development of the site could range from 3,311 trips per day for an office use to 20,460 trips per day for a complex of retail stores with a common parking area ( no one store has more than 100,000 square feet of gross floor area) . It is unlikely, however, that the property would he developed to M • or' • AUGUST 8, 1986 PAGE 2 • PLANNING BOARD MEMO ALLEN AND DORIS TURNER IMPACTS that intensity. An example of a more likely development of the site would include a 1 ,500 square foot fastfood restaurant, a 5000 square foot office building and a 10,000 square foot warehouse. Such uses would generate a total of 938 trips per day_ • EOJ_LF,l ,F1RF-A RESCUE- SERVICES • The Eno Volunteer Fire Department, Sheriff's Department. and Orange' County Rescue Squad have all commented on police, fire and . rescue , service and have indicated their ability to serve the property. (See letters dated January 16, 1986, . January 16: 1986 and January 17, 1986 respectively. ) • RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LAND uSg PLAN AND ZONING oulluAqu. • . The property is located within the Eno-2 Commercial/ Industrial . Transition activity node and the Twenty Year Transition Area. The Commercial/ Industrial Transition activity node designation • . corresponds with the full range of commercial and • industrial zoning . districts from Local Commercial-1 - (LC-11 through- Industrial-3 ( 1-3) . The. Zoning Ordinance states that property to be designated GC-4 must have direct access to major collector streets: as designated . by • the adopted Land Use Plana The access road which this . property fronts on leads directly to U.S. 70 which Is designated • • as an arterial. In the Orange County Land Use Plan. - Permitted Uses The purpose of the General Commercial UV CGC-4) •- district is to • provide suitable situated and sized sites In• Eno• and Hillsborough . Townships that allow a broad range of commercial : _office and service uses. Rezoning of the site would allow for development . • of the ' property for those uses permitted by right in the . district. - • In the GC-4 district, uses permitted by right include: PERMITTED BY RIGHT . • Daycare, Day -Nursery, Private Kindergarten Family Care Home Rehabilitative Care Facility Hotels/Motels . - Accessory Uses Botanical Gardens • • Bus Passenger Shelter Bus Terminals/Garages : Church. _ Governmental Protective Services . Military Installations 01E AUGUST 8, 1986 PAGE 3 PLANNING BOARD MEMO ALLEN AND DORIS TURNER IMPACTS Parks, Public and Non Profit Parking (as a principal use) Vocational Schools Schools of Dance, Art, Music Universities, Colleges, Institutions - Governmental Facilities Sewer/Water Pump Stations Animal Hospitals/Veterinary - Assembly Facility Banks/Financial Institutions . - Beauty/Barber Shops - Clubs/Lodges - Drive-in Theatres • - Farm Equipment/Sales Funeral Homes . Greenhouses (No on premises Sales) _ - Greenhouses (On-premises Sales) Health Services - Hospitals Laundry & Dry Cleaning Services Libraries Motor Vehicle Maintenance & Repair Motor Vehicle Service Stations Nightclubs/Bars Office/Personal Services (all types) Postal & Parcel Delivery Services Printing & Lithography • Recreational Facilities (Profit/Non profit) Golf Club/Course Electronic/Applicance Repair Services Research Facility - Restaurants (all types) Retail Trade Sales & Rental-Convenience Goods (ail types) Retail Trade Sales & Rental-Durable Goods (alli types) - _ - Storage & Warehousing ( Inside Building) Wholesale Sales . PERMITTED MATH THE I SSUANU OE_ A CLASS A SPECLALJISE PERMIT • Residential Hotel (Fraternities, Sororities, Dormitories) Public Utility Substation Adult Uses Junkyards Waste Management Facility •PERMITTED WITH THE I SSUANcE OF A CLASS B PECJ AL_SE PERMIT Group Care Facility Portable Buildings Radio/Television Towers and Elevated Water Storage Tanks Transmission Lines Kennels/Riding Stables • AUGUST 8, 1986 PAGE 4 , PLANNING BOARD MEMO O 1 S ALLEN AND DORIS TURNER IMPACTS Recreational Facility (Non--Profit) Rezoning of the 14 .97 acres will permit development of the parcel for a single commercial project or subdivision into individual development sites dependent on soil suitability for on-site wastewater facilities. Development of the lot(s) requires - compliance with applicable requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, including the Land Use Intensity System (floor area, open space, etc. ) , landscaping and screening, parking, signage and the Major Transportation Corridor overlay rezoning district. • FINDINGS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT' PERTAINING TO APPi.1 CAT[ON: Z-7-86 (Rezoning Rdquest)AlIen and Doris Turner BASED ON THE APPLICATION MATERIALS SUBMITTED, THE PLANNING. STAFF- � RECOMMENDS THAT THERE IS. EVIDENCE To SUPPORT THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS; r, ARTICLE 20 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING ARTICLE 20 SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUAT I ONIREZONI NG ("Yes" indicates compl I ante; "No" indicates NoncompI i ante PLANNING STAFF PLANNING FINDINGS BASED ON BOARD SUBMITTED APPLICATION EVIDENCE SUBMITTED TO SUPPORT FINDINGS RECOMMENDED Ordinance' Regul rements FI IVDlNGS The apii 1 i ca t i on must comp 1 y with all requirements speci- f led i n .'Art i cl a •20 - Amend- i merits. 'Those requirements include 20.32 a) trap showing affected rXYes No Site Plan provided at scale of Yes No property at scale-of not less than It= 100" nor more than 20' 20,3.2 -b) Legal deserlption of X Yep No Description provided with appl 1 cation Yes No property 20.3.2 c) Explanation of alleged _Yes _ No No error alleged Yes No ---- i arrorr If any, to be corrected by proposed amendment ' Yes No 20.3.2 d) Changed conditions, 1f ,.NeS _NO Applicant cites GC-4 zoning on both sides- any, which make amendment reasona- and across US 70 and 1-85 as justification b l y necessary to promote public for zoning,change. The tract immddiately '•to the health safety and general welfacer east.'-was rezoned from R-1 to GC-4 on 7-7-86. X Property Is located In a 20 Year Yes No 20.3.2 e) Manner In which proposed Yes ,No Transition Area and Commercial/ amendment will carry out purpose Industrial Node and Intent of adopted Comprehensive Plan. ARTICLE 4 DISTRICT STATEMENTS OF INTEREST AND APPLICATION CRITERIA ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS Article 4.2 identifies the criteria which will normally be Used to determine the application of a zoning district. designation. The applicatn has applied for a General Commercial-4 (GC-4) designation. The criteria for that district are set forth In Article 4.2.10 and are as follows: 1 . The site Is within an area X Yes No The property Is located within a Yes No designated as either Commercial Commercial/Industrial Activity Node. or Industrial Transition Activity Nodes, by the adopted Land Use Plan, in Eno or Hillsborough , Townships. 2. Water and sewer mains exist at the X,Yes No q letter has Eieen received concerning 'Yes No site or are to be made available as the existing septic system. This system part of the development process or Is functioning properly however no further the lot size for individual uses are .,Tin.farm.at.i-on-has—heen—r-ece-ived�on-ths--Tema i nder appropriate to the method of water of the site. Durham has indicated its ability to gu pply and sewage disposal , serve the tract adjoining on the east with water/sewer. 3 All property to be designated for new X Yes No The access road (SR1812) is malntalned Yes No b NCDOT for a distance of approximately development under this classification � ...� Y shall have direct access to major 220 feet a�ang the frontage of the property. collector streets, as designated by This road leads to US 70 which is designated. the adopted Land Use Plan, alli an ar'torial In the Land Use Plan. D . • ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT XIaLLSBOR0UGU - -022 •. NORTH CAROLINA • 27278 - - yam` 1r»14 0. *:"t t.I,■ - , July 29, 1986 Kenneth R. Embree • Suite 210 - Duke Forest Place • 3326. Chapel Hill Blvd . . . Durham, NC 27707 Re: Allen and Doris Turner Rezoning - Dear Mr. Embree: - In reviewing the . application ' for the -Allen and :Doris Turner . rozoning . request, I have found- two major Items that must- be - -- - addressed .In April of • this year a site plan was submitted for-this • property. This site plan showed the property located in the Major Transportation Corridor had been clear cut and graded. The planting dates as indicated on this plan have not been -complied with, therefore, a new plan with new dates must be submitted . The plan must also indicate the areas that have • been cleared and areas that are :-present i y ,wooded. To - comply - with. the Zoning Ordinance these plantings must be done immediately. If . it is impossible to plant immediately an estimate may be submitted for the plantings. Along with this estimate an escrow agreement or irrevocable letter of credit must be submitted for the amount of the estimate plus 10%. . •This agreement . or letter of credit would be valid for one year from the date of • approvai of the site plan. _ When the . plantings are completed by the developer the money in the escrow agreement or letter of credit would be released. If the plantings were not completed within this period of Orange County would be able to obtain this money to complete - the plantings required . The second item that must be addressed is an Erosion. Control Plan . The Erosion Control Ordinance requires an Erosion Control Plan when 20,000 sq. ft. -of land Is graded. Please • • - Kenneth R . Embree - 02` July 29, 1986 Page 2 • • contact Warren Faircloth, the Erosion Control Officer -about- submitting an Erosion Control Plan . Since the site is not An compliance with the Zoning - or. Erosion Control - Ordinances both of these items must be accomplished immediately. The Planning Staff will subratt a negative recommendation of the requested rezoning unless fits site comes Into compliance. • If there are any further questions please contact -me et the Planning Department. ' Sincerely, /X Eddie Kirk Planner EK/dg - • • 024 • C C B • • GUARANTEE OF IMPROVEMENTS FOR LANDSCAPING CEN:TRAL OUNNIuAN1 _'- _ OF 100—FOOT BUFFER IN MTC DISTRICT August. 1, 1986 Orange County Planning Dept. Hillsborough, NC 27278 Gentlemen: Enclosed is our Irrevocable Letter of Credit #86038 in your favor for $4,950.00 by order of our good customers, Allen and Doris Turner. - This credit will remain in effect until August 1, 1987- and - is subject to renewal upon agreement of the parties concerned_ -sincerely, G ►u 1°. f'irrpe, . Anne P. Pope Assistant Treasurer APP/fc Enclosure • • • ' Post Office Box 931,Durham,North Carolina 27702,9t97777 • • 02 I - _APPLICATION FOR EROSION CONTROL PLAN APPROVAL AND GRADING PERMIT ORANGE COUNTY EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCE - SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL DIVISION ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 106 EAST MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGH, N.C. 27278 - 1. NAME OF PROJECT:. Carolina Paving — Turner 2, LOCATION OF PROJECT:.=Ioate 2 Box 556 Durham, N. C. 27702 TOWNSHIP: Eno 1AK MAP: 25 BLOCK: LOT: 77 JURISDICTIONAL AREA: Orngp nemn±y - 3. SIZE OF TRACT: X5'6± _AC,; AMOUNT OF Di DISTURBANCE: 544.500 SQ.FT. 4. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION• clearing & grading . 5. PLANS PREPARED By: Credle Engineering Co. Inc. ADDRESS: _ , N.C. . - .PHONE:"682 2006 - , . CONTACT: _Sidney Credle _- . 6, PERSON OR FIRM RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN: NAME: Allen E. Turner - Durham, N.C. A PHONE: 38A856 6 ADDRESS: • P CONTACT:• • OFFICE USE ONLY . 7. FEES: - PLAN REVIEW: $ .937'50 DATE PAID RECEIPT L GRADING PERMIT: $ 187S.00 DATE PAID . RECEIPT 133 , TOTAL: $ 2812.50 DATE PAID s '6 RECEIPT i 93 S. -- APPLICATION AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS PLEASE READ CAREFULLY ! ! E - THIS APPLICATION IS SUBMITTED AND ACCEPTED SUBJECT TO THE -FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: - _ • THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS FORM IS, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, ACCURATE AND COMPLETE . PERSONNEL FROM THE EROSION-CONTROL DIVISION SHALL VISIT -THE SITE IN ORDER TO -DETERMINE IF THE EROSION. CONTROL.PLAN IS ACCEPTABLE. AND TO INSPECT THE .SITE FOR COMPLIANCE ONCE A GRADING PERMIT IS ISSUED. • ALL EROSION, CONTROL DEVICES SHOWN ON THE APPROVED -PLAN- OR- DESCRIBED IN THE PLAN NARRATIVE AND ANY MODIFICATIONS TO THE PLAN REQUIRED BY THE EROSION CONTROL OFFICER - SHALL BE- •INSTALLED AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME IN THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE AND MAINTAINED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED PLAN'. • UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, THE, SITE SHALL BE STABILIZED IN A PERMANENT MANNER AS DESCRIBED IN THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. CONTINUED ON BACK w 02€ . -9-8fiw - -THIS-PROJECT•PROJECT MUST • NFORM TO ALL APPROPRIATE l,NING AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS. FOR THE •LOCATION- OF• THE SITE.- - FAILURE TO FULFILL - THE REQUIREMENTS. AND . PROVIS-IONS. OF THE APPROVED EROSION CONTROL- PLAN AND GRADING .PERMIT SHALL -RESULT IN ENFORCEMENT ACTION . AS PRESCRIBED IN THE ORANGE COUNTY EROSION CONTROL-ORDINANCE. IF APPROVED, THIS PERMIT. IS NOT AN. AUTHORIZATION TO PLACE-ANY STRUCTURE ON THE SITE EXCEPT. FOR THE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES. - . THE EROSION .CONTROL PLAN- SHALL BE- MODIFIED BY THE- EROSION CONTROL - OFFICER AS •CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES- IF- THE PLANNED PRACTICES ARE FOUND TO BE INADEQUATE-TO-PREVENT OFFS I TE• SEDIMENTATION OR IF IT CAN BE SHOWN THP.T CERTAIN PRACTICES ARE UNNECESSARY. 2 .. .mtA1 86 S GNATURE DATE • - Allen E. Turner . A PRINT OR TYPE NAME AND TITLE - ' = VALIDATION PERMIT NUMBER 136242 PERMIT NOT VALID UNLESS STAMPED AND SIGNED BY THE EROSION CONTROL OFFICES::: EROSION CONTROL PLAN . GRADING PERMIT APPROVAL GRADING PERMIT. EXPIRES IF • . - . . . CONSTRUCTION IS NOT BEGUN PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES IF WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE- CONSTRUCTION IS NOT BEGUN. DATE OF VALIDATION.. - WITHIN. 6 MONTHS OF THE DATE _ OF VALIDATION . . • f f.'- v f„) ' { -r te: � ;` _ �• "'"rte Yi` r ''' va,� ,.. WAIVED 1 K5 n - 0 `pia p' W4 . , d" . A . LAE,. an _. .g" gt, It )(UP Mblika - ADS SIGNATURE OF OFFICER DATE SIGNATURE OF OFFICER DATE MODIFICATIONS, COMMENTS OR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, ETC. : • SIIAItI"It;VI U UWIYtKJC1lr NUJ r11YH1Yl.1ML Rr �rUI )1ui�i r r • ORAN COUNTY EROSION CONTROL ORL FIANCE SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL DIVISION _ ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 106 EAST MARGARET LANE , HILLSBOROUGH, N.C. 27278 0 2 r OWNERSHIP I. NAME OF PROJECT: Carolina Paving - Turner - 2. LOCATION OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY I N ORANGE COUNTY: Route 2 556 Durham, N. G. (Hwy 70 West) 3. APPROXIMATE DATE LAND DISTURBANCE WILL BEGIN:: 4. PURPOSE OF DEVELOPMENT: To relocate business • 5. APPROXIMATE AREA To BE UNCOVERED OR DISTURBED: 544.500 .SQUARE. FEET. 6. HAS AN _EROSION CONTROL PLAN BEEN SUBMITTED FOR 'APPROVAL? YES ID 7. LAND OWNER(S) OF RECORD: (USE ADDITIONAL PAGES IF NECESSARY) - Allen E.kowife Doris J. Turner NAME NAME 5001 Raintree Road STREET ADDRESS STREET ADDRESS 7 CURRENT MAILING ADDRESS CURRENT MAILING ADDRESS - Durham, N. C. 27712 CITY STATE ZIP CITY STATE. ZIP 383-4856 TELEPHONE NUMBER TELEPHONE NUMBER NAME NAME • STREET ADDRESS • STREET ADDRESS f CURRENT MAILING ADDRESS CURRENT MAILING ADDRESS . - CITY STATE ZIP CITY STATE ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER TELEPHONE NUMBER NAME NAME STREET ADDRESS STREET ADDRESS CURRENT MAILING ADDRESS CURRENT MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CITY _ STATE ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER TELEPHONE NUMBER CONTINUED ON BACK 026 eNTwTIM 8. LIST BOOK AND PAGE iERE DEED OR INSTRUMENT I ..:I LED IN ORANGE COUNT 'i: BOOK 553 A. PAGE 217 ; BOOK_ , PAGE . .; BOOK , PAGE BOOK , PAGE .; BOOK . , PAGE - ; BOOK- , PAGE FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY 1. PERSON(S) OR FIRMS) FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS LAND DISTURBANCE: Allen E. Turner NAME NAME 5001_ Raintree Road • STREET ADDRESS STREET ADDRESS • CURRENT MAILING ADDRESS CURRENT MAILING ADDRESS + Durham, North Carolina 27712 _ CITY STATE ZIP CITY - STATE ZIP 383-4856 TELEPHONE NUMBER TELEPHONE.NUMBER 2. REGISTERED AGENT, IF ANY, FOR THE PERSON OR FIRM FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE NAME . - STREET ADDRESS • CURRENT MAILING ADDRESS CITY . - STATE ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER - 3. THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF AND WAS PROVIDED BY ME WHILE UNDER OATH.. Allen E. Turner - SIGNATURE • TYPE OR PRINT NAME - . Aug. 7, 1986 - • owner-. TITLE OR AUTHORITY _ DATE . I, John J.. I,aAipe , A NOTARY PUBLIC OF THE COUNTY OF Durham , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT Allen E. Turner - PERSONALLY BEFORE ME THIS DAY - AND UNDER OATH ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THIS STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP AND FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FORM WAS EXECUTED BY HIM/HER. WITNESS MY HAND AND NOTARIAL SEAL, THIS, 7 DAY OF•August , 19 86 N TARY fx; \ • • L._ Fu rtc— cry • MY COMM I SS I ON EXP I RES / 2i4 /ie 19?/ "' -- O R A N G E C O U N T Y BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 025 ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date October 6,_1986 Action A enda Item Action SUBJECT: Z--8 -86 R. B. BARLOW, JR. AND ROBERT FAIRCLOTH DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING X Yes No Attachment(s) Information Contact: MARVIN COLLINS Application Vicinity Map Summary Sheet Telephone Numbers Hillsborough -- 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 967-9251 PURPOSE: To receive public comment on a proposed rezoning request for the property of R. B. Barlow, Jr. and Robert Faircloth to correct an error in the Zoning Atlas. NEED: The Planning Department initiated the request following a complaint about the nature of the use (auto repair shop) on Lot 11 of Tax Map 30 in Cheeks Township. An adjoining lot, Lot 10, was incorrectly designated Existing Commercial (EC-5) at the time Cheeks Township was zoned (October 1, 1984) . Lot 10 is a vacant, wooded lot and is 0.98 acres (42,511 square feet) in size. Lot 11 is 0.72 acres (31 , 188 square feet) in size and contains five (5) buildings a 26'x28' residence, store building, trailer, 9 'x13 ' shed and 31 •x35' garage. Both lots front on US Highway 70 and are situated between Frazier Road (SR 1310) and Redman Crossing (SR 1399) . At the time Cheeks Township was zoned, Lot 11 was occupied by Tyndall 's Gas and Grocery, and Lawn Mower Repair Shop. Both lots are designated Ten Year Transition and Water Supply Watershed in the Land Use Plan . The present zoning of Lot 10 is Existing Commercial (EC-5) , while the proposed zoning class- ification is R-1 Residential . The present zoning of Lot 11 is R-1 Residential , while the proposed zoning is Existing Commer- cial (EC-5) . IMPACT: Approval of the request would correct an error in the Zoning Atlas made at the time Cheeks Township was zoned. A complaint 03U has been filed concerning the nature of the use on Lot 11 - an auto repair shop . The complaint has addressed concerns about the excessive noise both during and after normal working hours, the unsightly nature of the operation, and travel safety since cars are parked within the right-of--way of Highway 70. The 1984 traffic count on US Highway 70 was 5,700 trips per day. Article 6 . 14 .2 of the Zoning Ordinance Csee attached copy) sets performance standards in regard to permitted noise levels. For properties zoned EC-5, noise levels cannot exceed 50 decibels between 7:00 am and 7:00 pm or 45 decibels between 7:00 pm and 7:00 am. For purposes of comparison, the noise level on a busy urban street is 90 decibels, while an accelerating motorcycle is rated at 110 decibels. The racing of automobile engines on Lot 11 would fall within the same general rating. The Sheriff 's Department has a decibel meter with which to determine If performance standards are met. The obvious problem of enforcement is that noise levels could be decreased at the time deputies appear to take measurements. A similar problem already exists in that automobile noise levels are increased after deputies have warned the occupants of the site that they are disturbing neighbors. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department recommends approval of the rezoning of Lot 10 from EC-5 to R-1 . The Planning Department recommends that Lot 11 be left in an R-1 classification . Non-residential uses on that site would become nonconforming and subject to the provisions of Article 11 .9 (see attached copy) . . ' • ..w• 7 r •T....•. r r ... J IC = n M / V s "i r r I i .is r f .-4.,‘ i 1 031 X36+.• r 56 - X27 ° 1S�OL I 1366 .. - " • O j.C.25AC.9 :1 291 s� i R 1,„ / sr r. s.>r 45AC. .i - i — © r� C w. t CD• I• t+r SLr 7p t 02 . • R I" I ser . sac 8 I 7 MAP 30 _ iwr c rw �.w._ III � -- - - • • • • ~,• FLO 160r ac Q 4y - - Oas an. DAM -0G R0S6.9 eC. I.AwC i - - -� �� I _ • ~--�rte` . —�,� `� 31 1 • /MST- ..p I LW rA - - �� —__— \ . - 14F X- . — .Ors► ..r. / II4 8ARL ,JR• MD ROBERT F FIRCLo $ - WP: Tto4 YEAR TRANS1' tat4 ewe _ ss c`immERCI .. EC-6 4 - - - . = - y LOT t 1 « ii-1 FINg10 - - _ - PROPV 6W0 roMv4 G: 1.0°r t D-R-1 - - - - _ ( E,tO Et4 IA1.,. - - _ _ -- t,,,c r ti • esttSTIMG RemED I. SCALE: MO ScAL .., 4 - i• J - ■ LEGVID • fia - - ----—••• ._ ORANGE COUNTY - ...=.�... -•--...�` I 0411,110P ..1.212. tMOro Ha- sue. sera, • r. . ra �`-' — CHEEKS - — ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA I APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT • • Date: August 6; 1986 TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA The undersigned do hereby make application to change the Zoning Atlas of Orange County as hereinafter requested . - - 1 . The property is Located on the south side of S.R.#. U-$- ( Highway 70 - Street/Road) between S.R.# 1310 and S.R.# 1399 It is known as Lots) 10 & 11 , Block NA of Orange County Tax Map. 30 -- Cheeks Township . It has a frontage of Lot 10-229 feet and a depth of Lot3103-212 feet a and contains Lot 11•-496 square feet or Lot 10--.98 acres. Lot 11-135 Lot 10-42,511.25/Dot 11-31,188 Lot?11-.72 - 2. It is desired and requested that the foregoing property be rezoned from Lot 10- EC-5 to R--1 - Lot 11- R-1 EC-5 3-.- The -;folL.owing- • information has ..,bean -attached __in_ support of the application for changing the Zoning Attes ( -- required on all applications) . ---------- *a. A fully dimensioned map et a scale of not loss than one (1) inch equals one—hundred (100) feat nor more then one 11) inch equals — twenty 1201 'feet—showier—the Lend which io proposed to be - rezoned. °b. A Legal description of the Lend proposed to be rezoned. *c. A statement of Justification addressing one or more of the -. following: - (11 The alleged error in the Zoning Ordinance, it any, which would be corrected by the proposed amendment with a detailed explanation of such error in the Zoning Atlas and detailed reasons how the proposed amendment will correct the error. [2) The changed or changing conditions, If any, in the area or in the County generally, which make the proposed amendment - reasonabLy necessary to the promotion of the public health. safety and general welfare. - *133 The manner in which the proposed amendment will Carry out _ the intent and purpose of the adopted Lend Dee plan or part thereof. - *[4) ALL other circumstances, factors end -reasons which the applicant offers in support of the proposed amendment - including, but not Limited to, documentation from service agencies (e.g. fire, police, rescue end utilities agencies) assuring services provision capability to the development. d. A List of all individuals, firms or corporations owning property adjoining or within five hundred (500) feet of the property sotg.F�t J r rezoning is attached. The List is currant as of • [Oats) - - -I certify that all information furnished in this application is .accurate to the best of my knowledge . - - App ticant (s) : _ V Address :_ Phone : ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT HILLSBOROUGH NORTH CAROLINA 27278 Nit! t_` .6.01 .,o fJl 4 fa • . Vii. CERTIFICATE OF MAILING • ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENTS ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA I , jurvin aiLm , Zoning Officer, Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that on or about Bugist 15, Ink, i mailed, by certified mail , postage prepaid, a Notice of the Public Hearing to be held on the request ly Robert Eft R.B. It L r Qzon i ng ni i o erty !4&n�.g In r Lod, �. Zoning Atlas �-� ���� � corCl�t 4 error to each property owner as required by Article 20, Section 20.6.3, of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance. • The notice mailed specified the date, time, place and subject of the Public Hearing on the zoning classification change. WITNESS my hand, this 15tl day of August. 1986. - _ &LA) Marvin Collins' Zoning Officer ' TAX MAIII �Ll��i'1r.1 V.�i.li�r tiI4 ut/.\.�..a1% •� �/�� l)151rcICT + +' 3LU/LOT x+d a X121.. (inc qr rrazier's Body Shop , 20 - 32, 2.32 arras tlhole L t . , • 0 - T. Orange %1amLce,WatOr Co- 28 - 21H Less than l acre Whole Lot Offico .. G: mAncor Inc* 28 21 a . ' 9.5 o ee' Whola Lat � z 28 p 35 !. acre , Whole Lot- EC 8 Ai Stegal.l's Front End — -- Sewice NE 450' N of V.S. ?Q EC - 5 wil.-Com Truck Co. 2$.- 37,r 36C 17.45 acres 2.5 ac. • M1' 450+. N of V.S. 70 SE 400' E, of S.R. 11.14 . EC - 5 Fira Service Station 28 - 20A 3.6 acres , 2 ac. •. NE 250' .E of S.Re 1114 • b 29 - 7 3 pares 3.,5 Gores 200' K 3001 , • EC 5 9; ng s Garage 28 ..- 26 Carmichael.'s Sharp Ali Shop 29'- 16 6 acres • ; � 150' x 300' 00, EC 5 & srall Engine Repair Lag Cabin 3Q - 4A Less than 1 acre Whole Lot EC = 5 "yn4Ajj Gas & Grocery ' 30 10 1 acre VIhole Lot Be - 5 & LawnMowcr Repair :tcdman Industries 31-8°4Q 9.97 acres . Whole Lot • pett ai iford a penx Service ' 31.8.9 1 acrd Whole -Lot Be 5 Statton .. :295W of $•A. ;004 Z • .1 Bf 14114 Milling Cos , 2 ioxeS ; old Store 34 5 Loss than . acre whols,Loh 34 •• 3.25 acres• i ac q 1501 x 300 Z .. 1. K D G Manufacturing ' Orange f1os�.cry 1i11 . 36-�i"2 LQSs than :� Acre X111 r; • .. 1 doze VOW of both,lotm EC - 5 Red �e�rn Auction House . • 36"A,163#4 , ' , Dane Farm Sexviae + 35��^5 1 Acre mcaa Lab 1/2 acre► Whole �w EG - g 1 T��n rr� Convfln�aAQa Stoxa 30�•�-lC, � ,, *ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ICLLSBOROUGH NORTH CAROLINA 27278 4 • 40- a, e � • MEMORANDUM TO: ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD - FROM: MARVIN COLLINS, PLANNING DIRECTOR DATE: AUGUST 13, 1986 SUBJECT: Z-8-86 R.B. BARLOW, JR. AND ROBERT FAiRCLOTH DENERAL_ INFORMATION APPLICANT: Robert Faircloth (Lot 11 ) 816 Rainey Street Burlington, NC 27215 - R.B. Barlow, Jr. (Lot 10) Rt. 3, Box 228 Hillsborough, NC 27278 LOCATION: South side of U.S. Highway 70 between Frazier Road (SR 1310) and Redman Crossing (SR 1399) . STATUS OF APPLICANT: Owners REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning of Lot 10 from Existing Commercial EC-5 to R-1 Residential . Rezoning to Lot 11 from R-1 Residential to Existing Commercial EC-5. PURPOSE: To correct error made in Zoning Atlas at time Cheeks Township was. zoned - October 1 , 1984. LOT SIZE: Lot 10 - 0 .98 acres or 42,511 .25 sq ft Lot 11 - 0.72 acres or 31 , 188.00 sq ft EXISTING LAND USE: Lot 10 - Vacant wooded land. Lot 11 -- Auto repair shop and residential .- - SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: . North.- . EC-5 and R-1 with trucking operation front end alignment shop, mobile home park and single-family residences. South - E l and R-1 with mobile home manufacturer • and vacant, wooded land . 03C - - -East - R-1 with single-family residences. West - R-1 with vacant, wooded land, mobile home park and single-family residences. LAND USE PLAN: Designated 10-Year Transition and Water Supply Watershed . ZONING: Lot 10 is zoned EC-5 and is subject' to the Protected Watershed overlay zoning district. Permitted uses in the EC-5 district include veterinarians, banks, beauty and barber shops, farm equipment sales, health services, laundry and dry cleaning establishments, motor vehicle repair (body shop)., motor vehicle sales and service stations, offices, restaurants, retail trade, and storage and warehousing. The purpose of the EC--5 zoning district is to provide a district to be used only during the application of zoning to previously unzoned townships • to accomodate existing commercial uses. Lot 11 is zoned R-1 Residential which Is intended to provide locations ' for rural non-farm residential - development at low intensities and where water and sewer service is provided through use of well and septic tanks. Lot 11 is also subject to the requirements of the Protected Watershed overlay zoning district. • • r. ' ul 6.13.1 General Applicability 0 3 1(7 After the effective date of this ordinance, any use estab- lished or changed to, and any building, structure, or land (:- • developed, constructed or used for, any Permitted Principal - Use, shall comply with all of the performance stanclA+-ds herein set forth for the district involved. These perfor- mance standards shall apply only in- commercial and industrial districts. - 6.13.2 Application To Extensions, Enlargements, Etc. If any existing use or building or other structure is ex- tended, enlarged, or reconstructed, the performance stand- ards for the district involved shall apply with respect to such extended, enlarged, or reconstructed portion or portions of such use, building, or other structure. 6.13.3 Wired Compliance By Non-Conforming Situations Within twenty-four months of the effective date of this ordinance, all presently existing uses of lands, buildings or other structures shall comply with the performance standards as herein set forth for the district involved. 6.14 Supplementary Performance Standards i The following performance standard shall be supplementary to the standards contained applicable in the areas subject to the jurisdication of this ordinance in the district indicated. 6.14.1 Electrical Disturbance Or Interference No Permitted Use, Special Use or Accessory Use in any commer- cial or industrial district shall: a) Create any electrical disturbance that adversely affects any operations or equipment other than those of the creator of such disturbance; or b) Otherwise cause, create, or contribute to the interfere with electronic signals (including television, and radio broadcasting transmissions) to the extent that the operation of any equipment not owned by the creator of such disturbance is adversely affected. 6.14.2 Noise a) Within any LC-1, 0-I, EI or 1-1 district; no permitted Prin- ciple Use, Special Use or Accessory Use shall generate noise that tends to have an annoying or disruptive effect upon uses (- located outside the immediate space occupied by that use 6-15 03 E 1 .b) Tabel A below establishes the maximum permissible noise _ levels for permitted uses in the NC-2, CC-3, GC-4, EC-5, 1-2 and 1-3 districts. Measurements shall be taken at the boundary lines of the zoning lot in the case of NC-2 and 1-2 districts and at the districts boundary lines for • CC-3, GC-4, EC-5, 1-3 and AS districts on which the use is located, and, as indicated the maximum permissible noise levels .vary according to the zoning of the lot adjacent to the lot on which the use is located. TABLE A Maxiim Permitted Sound Levels dB(A) . - (re: 0.0002 Microbarl Zoning of Lot Zoning of Adjacent Lot Residential or PD Commercial Industrial 7:00 am 7:00 pm - 7:00 in ._71O0am J7:00 pr 7:00 pm 7:00 am - 7:00 pm 7:0Opm 7:00 el • NC-2, I-2 50 45 50 S5 - 60 65 • " CC-3, GC-4, EC-5 50 45 55 60 - 65 70 I-3 and AS - • NOTE A: lc A decibel is a measure of a unit of sound pressure. Sound waves having the same decibel level "sound" loud or softer to the human ear depending upon the frequency of the sound wave in cycles per second (i.e. , whether the pitch of the sound is high or low) . Thus, an A-weighted filter, construc- ted in accordance with the specifications ons of the American National Standards Institute, which automatically takes _ account of the varying effect on the human ear of different pitches shall be used on any sound level measurements re- quired by this section. Accordingly, all measurements are expressed in dB(A) to reflect the use of this A--weighted filter. - - NOTE B: The standards established in Table A in terms of the Equi- valent sound Level (leg) which must be calculated by taking 100 instantaneous A-weighted sound levels at ten second in- tervals and computing the Leg. in accordance with standard - ANSI procedures. c) Impact noises are sounds that occur intermittently rather than continuously. Impact noises generated by sources that do not operate more than one minute in any one hour period are permissible up to a level of l0dbA in excess of the 1::. figures listed in Table A, except that this higher level of P ermissible noise shall not apply from 7:00 pm to 7:00 am • 6-16 • ax - Prior to termination the following limitations shall applk:• ,I 039 a) There shall be no enlargement, increased. intensification. or - alterations to the use, its permanent structure or both. b) If the use ceases for more than ninety days or a total of one- hundred eighty days in one year period, subsequent use of. the premises shall conform to the district regulations. C) No such use shall be. located or moved to any portion of the lot other than that occupied at the time that non-conforming status was created. d) No such land. shall be subdivided nor any structure added, except for purposes and in a manner conforming to district regulations. Subdivision, however, which does not increase the degree of non- conformity shall be permitted. 11.9 Non-Conforming Uses of Major Structures, Or Structures and Premises in Combination Non-conforming use of structures with a value higher than in 11...8 - above, or of such structures and premises in combination, may be continued, provided: a) Such uses may not be enlarged, extended altered or replaced, . except. for a change to a use permitted in the district in which 11:: located, except as provided in b) below. b) A non-conforming use may be extended through portions of a builaug manifestly arranged or intended for such use, but not otherwise, • and shall not extend to occupy land outside such building or any additional building not used for such non-conforming use at the time that non-conforming status was established. c) If a non-conforming use ceases for more than one hundred eighty days in any two year period, subsequent use shall conform to the regulations of the district in which located. d) Individual mobile homes within mobile home parks, non-conforming - under this section, may be replaced with other individual mobile homes or dwelling units provided that the total number of units - does not exceed the: number existing at the time that the mobile park became non-conforming. Amended 7/1/85' • e) Individual mobile homes not located within mobile home parks may be replaced with other individual Mobile homes or dwelling units. 11 . 10 ton-Conforming Structures, Other Than Signs - - A structure which is non-conforming, due to noncompliance with one or more requirements in the Table of Dimensional Requirements of this ordinance and which is used for a use permitted in the district in which located, such structure may remain, provided: a) That any structural change to the building shall not increase the de- gree of non-conformity. Structural changes which decrease or do not affect the degree of non-conformity shall be permitted. 11-5 O R A N G E C O U N T Y BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS U 4 G ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date tober 6, $6 Action A enda Item fp SUBJECT: LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT - INVENTORY OF CULTURAL, HISTORICAL , RECREATIONAL , BIOLOGICAL AND GEOLOGICAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT: PLANNING � PUBLIC HEARING Z(_ Yes No Attachment( s) information Contact: MARVIN COLLINS BRAD. TORGAN Inventory Document (See 8-25-86 Agenda) Proposed Text Changes to Pages 2.2-6 and 2.2-7; Existing Text. Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 967-9251 PURPOSE: To receive public comment on proposed text amendments to the Land Use Plan . NEED: Orange County contains many sites of cultural , historical , recreational , biological and geological significance. Section IV-B-2, Land_ Sulfability. , of the Subdivis€on Regulations. contains a mandate to the Planning Board to consider the over- all design of a subdivision in light of the suitability of the land for development. Land suitability includes an investi- gation of historic sites and unique natural areas. Although information has been available through a variety of local and State agencies, it has never been compiled in one source, making it difficult for the Planning Department and the Plan- ning Board to adequately assess the impact of subdivision proposals on such resources. Furthermore, similar mandates are not present in the Zoning Ordinance. IMPACT: In May of 1986, an inventory of cultural , historical , recrea- tional , biological and geological significance was completed. Incorporation of the document into the Land Use Plan represents an important first step in insuring the protection and/or preservation of significant natural and cultural resources. If approved, specific mechanisms such as incentive zoning, density transfers and cluster development can be developed and/or utilized through which to achieve this goal . In addition, public and private agencies and organizations can be contacted 041 for assistance in maintaining and managing significant areas. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of amendment to text and incorporation of inventory as appendix to the Land Use Plan . WJ _ TO AMEND THE LAND USE PLAN BY SUBSTITUTION, PAGES 2.2-6, 2.2-7 04� A .i Certain areas in Orange County possess unique or exemplary natural characteristics which are considered to be of great value; be it economic, educational , biological , or in some other sense. A natural area, as defined by the Triangle J Council of Governments, is "any space containing an unusual or exemplary biological habitat, geologic feature, or hydrologic location ."1 Natural areas can be broken down further into additional classifications: © Endangered Plant/Animal Sites - habitats of species identified as endangered . o Threatened Plant/Animal Sites - habitats of species that, while not endangered statewide, are rare and threatened with major habitat loss and population decline in Orange County. o Special Plant/Animal Site - habitats of species that, white rare, are not yet endangered or threatened and exist in small populations, are targets of exploitation, and vulnerable to specific pressures .a o Plant Communities - sites whose forest canopy, understory, and herb/vegetation layer is either unique or of a particularly high quality. o Exemplary Geologic Formations - exposed geologic formations of a particularly high quality or unique to the area. The Natural Heritage Program of the '_ North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development, and the Triangle Land Conservancy have identified over thirty separate populations of endangered species along with numerous additional plant communities and other natural areas in Orange County. These areas include public lands such as Eno River State Park, quasi-public lands such as Duke Forest, areas with multiple private owners such as Occoneechee Mountain, and small sites in single private ownership_ The presence of these unique natural features in Orange County suggests that special efforts should be made to manage these areas and sites so as to conserve and protect those characteristics that make the site biologically or geologically important. This may include regulatory measures to insure protection or preservation of those features. Historic Sites Although sites of historic and cultural significance are part of the man-made environment and not natural features they, nevertheless, are unique physical features that can have an impact on growth patterns within the county. Thus, they require treatment similar to unique and exemplary natural features and merit considerarion in this section.. 044 Orange County, founded over 230 years ago, is an area rich in history . Chapel Hill , Carrboro, and Hillsborough each have Historic Districts and other buildings on the National Register of Historic Places . There are additional National Register Sites in Cheeks, Hillsborough, and Bingham Townships. The North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources has also identified over twenty sites in rural, sections of the county that, while not yet nominated or eligible for the National Register, are architecturally significant or Important to the history of Orange County. While existing buildings are perhaps the easiest historic sites to document they are by no means the only ones. Numerous mills once provided for the economic well- being of the county; many of the dams and raceways still exist. Over 150 cemeteries and burial sites provide a record, in many cases the only record, of the lives and deaths of Orange County residents . The Archeology Branch of the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources has identified nearly 200 archeological sites in the county, recommending further study for many of them. Churches and rural community centers, including recreational facilities, should also be acknowledged as unique physical features. Their existence imparts an Identity and cohesion to rural communities and neighborhoods that can benefit the planning process. While chuch buildings maybe of recent vintage and not of historic value, the same does not necessarily hold true for the congregations. Over twenty Orange County congregations have been in continuous existence for at least 150 years . A list of culturally and historically important sites, along with natural areas, is con+a-fined in Appendix D: An Inventory of Sites of Cultural , Historical , Recreational , Biological , and Geological Significance in the Unincorporated Portions of Orange County. As information on new sites is gathered or information on existing sites changes the inventory may be updated administratively by the Planning Department Staff . 1 Southern Highlands , Mountain Resource Management_ Pian, 1974. North Carolina Department of Natural and Economic Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation . Area wide Water Quality Management Planning, 208 Protect Inventory of Existing Uses . P. IV GI . 1976. Triangle d Council of Governments . 2 Classificafications of endangered, threatened, and special species according to Endangered and Threathened. Plants- and Animals of North Carolina, 1977 . North Carolina Museum of Natural History . • • • - 044 TEris allows the general public to ',mow in a broad manner what types of development are suitable for certain uses, including septic tom, fau — dations, roads and prime agricultural land. The soil suitability classi— • ficatian Sys Lem identifies the constraints posed by the various categories.. Group la and lc — well suited for most urban uses Group 2a and 2c suited for most urban uses with precautions Group 3 — erosion potential - Group 4 and 5 — plastic subsoil Group 8 • shallowness to bedrock Group 9 — steep slopes _ • Group 10 -. flooding • Unique Nail Areas Certain areas possess unique natural characteristics thick are ocusidezz- - valuable,_ although not necessarily in an eccnoard a sense. Data an natural areas gathered by the Triangle J Council of Governments as part of the 201 study for the region defined a natural area as "any space containing an io or exemplary biological habitat,. geologic feature or hydrologic hydrologic locat3on In. Cmange County the following unique natural areas,_moug others,. have been identified by the 'Mangle study:. • o -Paid Mountain -- located between Old Hillsbomugh Foa-d (SR 1009 and Union Grove Church Road (SR 1111); in Chapel Kell Township_ The site is located in Duke Forest. o • •Blac swccd Mountain -- located in Chapel gi/1 Toms hip eases of Old Hillsborough Road (SR 1009) within Duke Forest o .Duke Forest Natural Area — this is a. 151 ac site within the-. LCorstian Division of Duke Forest located on MC. 86 north. of Turkey Farm Road (SE 1730) in Chapel Hi i 7 unship. o Ntorszn Creek Bluff — this site near University Fake Darx in Chapel Hill Township contains two north facing bluffs as well as inter- esting. flora. . - o Occcneschee Mountain — the mountain is located in IHi11 sborough Township between I--85 and the Eno River. The section known as Panthers Dan is of special geologic and botanical import. 1Souree'_'' 'Southern Hi4 ands-; 'Mountain'Resources -Manager, nt .Vol... 2 L 1974.. North Carolina"Depart of Natural.. and • Economic 'eso>,zrces, Division of Parks and Recreation. - Areawide Water Quality Mana_cement Plarninrc. 208 Project Inventory of E d sting Uses. P. IV Gi. 1975. Triangle 3 Council of C-overnrents. • • 4 Bernheiza Tract -this 90 acre tract is part of the E io River 04` State Park and is located between I_85- and Wi l l et Road (SR 156$) in i~ho Township- _ 0 - University Lake - the Lake and land immediately surrounding it are awned by the University of North Carolina_ It is a rela- tively undisturbed area that contains interesting flora, This area is in Chapel Hill Township_ _ The presence- of unique- natural features in Orange County suggests that special. efforts should be made• to age these areas so as to conserve and protect their natural characteristics- Historic Sites Although historic sites are part of the man-made environment and. not natural featuw es, they require sire-in," treatment to the unique natural features and deserve consideration in this section., Orange County is an area rich in history. The- Chape]. Hill Historic District,and the Hillsborough Historic- District are both on the Nat ional Register- or Historic. Places.. Outside of these built-up areas for - Cournty ccz tains one privately owned home which is on the National. Register. It is Mooref i.elds,. the former horn: of Alfred Moore, U.S. - - Supreme Court Justice.- It was built in 1785•as his summer house and is -• located in Cheeks Township on backs Mill Road (SR 1134). In additica,. there are over a dozen sites in the County which have-been c _ by the` State or North Carolina as places of historic interest but which. are not yet on the National Historic. Register. PLAN MIERPRENATICN To facilitate the land use decision-making. process in which envirum ntal. • features cane into play, it is useful to divide .such features into two, cate ,es: critical features and sensitive features. Critical features are those which can tolerate only minimal intnic . by man's activities either because of their fragile nature or because they are hazardous to people and development. Of the environmental features discussed,. the 100-year floodway, the unique natural areas and the historic sites seem to meet this criteria.. Sensitive features are somewhat more tolerant of intrusion and alter- - - ation_ They many- require special development restrictions or design. standards to insure that the detrimental effects of development are minimized and/or that problematic environmental conditions are - adequately considered to reasonably assure good development practices _ and. results_ This category covers most of the environ rental features. _ Combinations of sensitive features may warrant des3 +,atlon as a critical feature.: Decisions are necessary to determine if such features ciambine in an additive manner which significantly compounds the negative impacts of improper development activities. Such gray areas require �, t1.1 elation and analysis. ' 2.2-7• ORANGE COUNTY 0 4 t BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date October f3_..19.86 Action aQ da item SUBJECT: PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENTS ( 1 ) Off-Street Parking (Handicapped Parking Facilities) (2) Design Standards Application - Existing Mobile Home Parks DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING X Yes No Attachment( s) Information Contact: MARVIN COLLINS Proposed Text Amendments Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill -- 967-9251 PURPOSE: To receive public comment on proposed text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. NEED: No requirement exists in the Zoning Ordinance for the provisic;41 of handicapped parking facilities. Such facilities are cur- rently provided through the attachment of conditions of ap- proval on subdivision plats, planned developments and special use permits, or through the application of the N.C. State. Building Code requirements. The Ordinance Review Committee of the Planning Board as well as the full Planning Board recommended that a public hearing be held this date to consider deletion of Article 6.21 . 1 a) 2) of the Zoning Ordinance. The provision requires each mobile home space in an existing nonconforming mobile home park to be improved in accordance with design standards applicable to new mobile home parks as units are replaced. The recommendation resulted from a public meeting held by the Ordinance Review Committee on July 31 , 1986 at which spokesmen for mobile home park owners, operators and residents requested the amendment. IMPACT: The proposed ordinance amendments would require handicapped parking spaces to be a minimum of 13 feet in width and 20 feet in length . A minimum of two (2) handicapped spaces or one ( 1 ) for every 20 standard parking spaces would be required. Spaces must be clearly marked for handicapped use and must be within;. 100 feet of a building entrance. Curb cuts or ramps must also be provided for each space for access to adjoining walkways. The N.C. State Building Code currently requires one (1 ) Nandi-- capped parking space in each 50 standard spaces but recommends 04 twice that amount. The deletion of Article 6.21 . 1 a) 2) , if approved, would provid a "grandfather situation" for existing nonconforming mobile home parks during a period in which mobile home park owner/operators would work with the Planning Department/Board in developing standards for new/existing parks. The standards would then be brought back to public hearing at a later date. A report outlining recent trends in mobile home occupancy, emergency services concerns about mobile home parks, and a comparison of design standards of other jurisdictions will be presented at the meeting. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of amendments. WJ PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS 04c- ORDINANCE: ZONING ORDINANCE REFERENCE: ARTICLE 10 OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING •. ORIGIN OF AMENDMENT: X STAFF X PLANNING BD. BOCC PUBLIC- OTHER STAFF PRIORITY RECOMMENDATION: X HIGH MIDDLE LOW COMMENT: To address a functional gap in the ordinance. EXPECTED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: AUGUST 26, 1986 ********************** PURPOSE OF AMENDMENT: To provide design standards for handicapped parking facilities in the Zoning Ordinance. ISSUES/ IMPACTS: No requirement exists in the Zoning Ordinance for the provision of handicapped parking facilities.. Currently these facilities are provided through the attachment of conditions of approval on subdivisions, planned developments and special use permits.. EXISTING ORDINANCE PROVISION(S) : Section 10 .3 b) Each parking space shalt contain a, minimum area of one hundred eighty square feet and have a minimum width of 9 feet. However, where there are lots designed to accomodate more than ten vehicles, up to twenty-five percent of the spaces may contain a minimum area of one hundred twelve point five square feet and a minimum width of seven point five feet.. The smaller spaces, if provided,- shall be designated for use only by compact cars (Manufacturerest frame classes four through eight. ). PROPOSED AMENDMENT(S) : ADD TO Section 10 .3 b) Handicapped parking spaces shall have a minimum width of 13 feet and length of 20 feet. (NEW) Section 10.8 flandlcaoped ParAlag_L=I l i tjgs. 04 A minimum of two (2) spaces per parking lot or at least one ( 1 ) handicapped parking space for every twenty (20) standard parking spaces or fraction thereof, whichever is greater, shall be designed for use by the physically handicapped. Such spaces shall be clearly marked and reserved for the exclusive use by handicapped persons. A sign designating the space for the physically handicapped shall be. placed at the head of the space. Handicapped spaces shalt be placed within 100 feet of the major entrance of the building or function. Curb cuts or ramps shall be provided for each space for access to adjoining walkways or paths. ******************* ORDINANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE: PLANNING BOARD (PRELIMINARY REVIEW) : BOCC (ADVERTISEMENT) : r c400 u",nON 11 K 3.3 parking cats FOR CURB CUT SEE nx3.z(b) IIX33(y 2y OF TOTAL NUMBER irsicN(srg srw.) OF SPACES OR A MINIMUM OF ONE SHALL BE SET ASIDE 4 DESIGNATED FOR USE OF PHYSICALLY DISABLED. SUCH PARKING SPACES SMALL BE CLEARLY MARKED BY SIGNS FOR USE OF HANDICAPPED. x W{66iCS1AIR5 CANNOT PIT gaauuR SPkM "ANDICAPP20 SPACE BETWEEN CARS Ilx336) HANDICAPPED PARKING IN REGSIUR 3PACE5 SPACES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF W-G" THE E%REQUIREMENT FOR HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES VIDE LOCATED AS IS I IN So. THIS IS CONSIDERED TO SE VERY MINIMAL, RESERVED NEAR AS POSSIBLE TO > TWICE THIS AMOUNT-fS MUCH PREFERRED 2E . BUILDING ENTRANCES R +A+� PARKING OR CENTRALLY LOCATED P® ,n 1N PARKING LOTS EMU BETWEEN BUILDINGS c» �—► (SEE DESEGNATED WALKWAYS- PAGE S) s �uw ua rsgr.wn. Nc.�.w. Ow •til l n 051 (11x)3.3--parking lots Parking lots provided for buildings to which Section 1.1 applies snap be provided with parking spaces as follows: a) Parking spaces for the handicapped shall be set aside and identified with above parking level signs for use by individuals with physical disabilities.'Painted curb signs are acceptable. The minimum number of assigned spaces shall be as follows: 1) A minimum of one such parking space for the handicapped shall be provided and In addition at least one space per 50 spaces shalt be set aside for the handicapped. b) Parking spaces identified for the physically handicapped that are placed on the diagonal or vertical shall be a minimum of 12 feet 6 inches wide and shall be located as near as possible to the main public entrance of a single building and centrally located where practical In parking lots that serve more than one . building. 'NOTE: General Statute 20-37.5 and 20-37.6 have been amended in the definition.of handicapped and parking privileges of the handicapped.Legal signage and use of required parking spaces is included. See Appendix D-6. (llx-121 • . , = 05' . : _• r POST PLACED TO I PREVENT PARKED - -1.. CARS FROM BLOCKING - • ~•' RAMP.POST SHOULD NOT BE PLACED WHERErT '.�',,..„. ISLOCKS WHEELCHAIR CURB CUTS SHOULD BE ACCESS TO CARS AT 0,3204 ALL WALKS CROSSING LOCATED WHERE IT IS MAJOR POINTS OF ODJVEWA'I"5 MUST`iIAPP PEDESTRIAN FLOW,LOST OONN TO A COMMON IM poSSl L.E FOR 'INEM SHOULD BE TALL ENOUGH To BE OBSTRUCTED BY CARS 4 APPROPRIATELY PAINTED LEVEL WITH THE STREET. OR OTHER BARRIERS- OR MARKED TO EASILY BE . CARE CURD r@ IS NOT 4 SO SEEN OVER PEOPLES // ITSELF A H air TONE- . BUM• /folio 4 .... . : . .. __i 0 tilillv IL• C AASSOPGR //l%..•• 1f fl1 M , LE6OMM[NOED _• AVOID PLACING Cline. RAMPS IN STREET se r �?' AS ABOVE.DROP OFF HANDRAILS CAN BE AT SIDE IS HA• A.RDOUa USED AT CURB RAMPS TO ALL UNLESS PA*P FOR PEDESTRIAN SAFETt.CAR- • IS GREATER THAN tad' SHOULD BE TAKEN THAT SUCH 'WOE WIiN SIDES CURB RAMPS # RAILS Do NOT GRADUALLY FEATHERED IN THEMSELVES BECOME A AT A SLOPE OF I:20. HAZARD TO THE BLIND. y'may.- �. .... -.,_ .��f - �.. ._.� -- -. v- w. RIBBED SURFACE FOR !Ng-' 1 FOR CURB Geri'DETAILS DETECTION BY THE LEANrD)REFER TO NORTH cARoLWF. y .. Hit.i.40. • .'.•:,..-..... IO BLIND 6ENERAL STATUTE Es W.444+ AND THE H-C-DEPARTMEN1 OFTRA-"ISPORTATI OPI SIDE FLARED 2'-0F DIVISION OF ItIGKWh EubLItATIoN:GUIDELINES ." CURB CUTS AND RAM,P5 Fok ••:TG:- '• .' BANDICAPPED PERSoNSi -` AND RECQ MENDATION5 � - . COPQTAlNEo HERE. - x // CURE CUT SHOULD NAVE A • ///,,,,, f ! TEXTURED,NoN-SLIF 4/ -- it i 4- _� SUgFACE SWcH AS EtEoO ' /��� :-- FINISai CQNcRETE. - 'Y - . F�L`ANTINbORGOAL • / 'T '-- RECO:'LMEMOEO TYPE I- FLARED ."-:: tlyLL r `"�^ .::.•'. PLANTING OR GRAVEL - • '., RECOMMeNOeO .fit l' EKE: a . !' • • �i a � 4 -. It.a TYPE RI-PARALLEL I, CURB RAMPS MAY LEAD WHEN IN51$FICIENT DEP`k. `•..fII WIW••:; THE BLIND UNRNO'WINGLV OS.AVAILABLE FOR 8-33% .w INTO THE STREET!�MAY SLOPE.RAKP MAT RUN �// //j I • , °• BE A HAZARD UNLESS PARALLEL TO STREET. �' 'THEY AKE CONSISTENTLY off /-,,,,*,/,,,,,, ��r• MARKED WITH A WARNING TYPE IV-WARPED !I --i TExTuRE. RAMPS WHICH SEE N.C.DEPARTMENT of•• EXTEND INTO THE STREET TRANSPORTAT1oN DIV►SIOP� • TYPE II -RADIUSED CURS t DROP-OFF APiE ALSO OF HIGHWAY PUGLICATIOOI. THIS TYPE (PREFERRED BECAUSE DANGEROUS. THISTYPE REQUIRED Al CURB PROVIDES VISUAL DEMARCATION ALL STREETS,HIGHMAYS, 4 DI REGTI ONAL ORIENTATION FOR ROADS.ETC..IN ACCORDANCE THE BLIND. WIT7;GS 134'44.14 0 5 PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ORDINANCE: Zoning Ordinance REFERENCE: Article 6.21.1 Existing or New Mobile Home Parks ORIGIN OF AMENDMENT:_X_Staff_X_Planning Board BOCC Public Other: Mobile Home Park Owners/Operators STAFF PRIORITY RECOMMENDATION:_x_High, Middle Low COMMENT: EXPECTED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: September 16. 1986 ******************************** PURPOSE OF AMENDMENT: To consider deleting Article 6.21.1 a) 2) of the Zoning Ordinance which requires that each mobile home space in an existing mobile home park to be improved in accordance with subsection 7 .20.4 a) . That section contains new design standards regarding space size (10,000 square feet) , setbacks, patios/decks. etc_ IMPACTS/ISSUES: The Planning Board Ordinance Review Committee conducted a public meeting on July 31. 1986 for the purpose of receiving public comment on mobile home park standards adopted 3-18-86 . The standards were placed under moratorium on 4-7-86. pending review by the Planning Board. Two issues emerged at the Committee meeting: (1) the "retro-active" nature of the ordinance; and (2) the standards. Spokesmen for the group present asked that the provisions -- Article 6.21.1 a) 2) - be rescinded. The Ordinance Review Committee subsequently recommended and the full Planning Board adopted a resolution calling for a special public hearing on September 16 to consider the amendment. The Board of Commissioners set the public hearing date for September 16 at its August 19 meeting. The proposed ordinance amendment, if approved, would provide a "grandfather situation" for existing nonconforming mobile home parks during a period in which mobile home park owner/operators would work with the Planning Department/Board in developing standards for new/existing parks. The standards would then be brought back to public hearing at a later date. EXISTING ORDINANCE PROVISIONS: Attached PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: Deletion of Article. 6.21.1 a) 2) 05` ORANGE COUNTY PLAN-N.01G DEPAR ; Bpi • HILLSBOROUGH NO C&ROLLYA. 27278 oriti el.. gAtlf� = SDTICE On March 18, 1986 the Board of Commissioners adopted amendments to the Orange County Zoning Ordinance which affect enisting mobile home- parks developed prior to September 1981 in Chapel Hill, Hillsborough, no and Bingham Townships and prior to 0ctober 1984 in Cheeks Township. These mobile hone parks are considered to be non conforming. The adopted amendments require that replacement of mobile home units in non-conforming mobile home parks be subject to the following provisions: 1) a 10,000 square foot space per mobile home unit 2) a permanent stand for each mobile home unit 3) setback requirements for each space: 25' setback from road and/or road right-of- way - 10 ' setback from rear/side lines of the space fit) a 180 square foot patio for each space 5) two (2) off-street parking spaces for each space 6) a walkway connecting each mobile home area unit to the patio and parking area The requirements are more specifically spelled out in. Sections 6 .21 .1a) and 7 .20 .4a) of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance which are attached for your information . Please contact the Orange County Planning Department if you have any questions on this matter. Hillsborough 732-8181 Mebane 2272031 Durham 888-7331 Chapel Hill 98T-925I 05 ORANGE COUNTY PLANTING DEPAR IDS • HILLSBOROUGH NORTH CAROLINA. 27278 4. NOTICE On March 18, 1986 the Board of Commissioners adopted amendments to the Orange County Zoning. Ordinance which affect existing mobile home parks developed prior to September 1981 in Chapel Hill, Hillsborough, Eno and Bingham Townships and prior to October 1984 in Cheeks Township. These mobile home parks are considered to be non conforming. The adopted amendments require that replacement of mobile home units in non-conforming mobile home parks be subject to the following .provisions: 1) a 10,000 square foot space per mobile home unit 2) a permanent stand for each mobile home unit 3) setback requirements for each space: - 25' setback from road and/or road right-of- way 10 ' setback from rear/side lines of the space }_ 4) a 180 square foot patio for each space 5) two (2) off-street parking spaces for each space 6) a walkway connecting each mobile home area unit to the patio and parking area The requirements are more specifically spelled out in Sections 6 .21 .1a) and 7 .20 .4a) of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance which are attached for your information . Please contact the Orange County Planning Department if you have any questions on this matter . Hillsborough 732-8181 - Mebane 2272031 Durham 688-7331 Chapel Hill 987-9251 . 05t 6 .1-9 RESERVED 6 .20 Larxe Ground 411ser,ion ,Systams ( 7 ,000 ears : oar da- i i ;t pistkriatp and Rural Buffer District; 6 .20 .1 Ground absorption systems with a design capacity of 3 ,000 gallons per day or more and package treatment plants for sanitary sewage disposal are expressly prohibited in the AR districts and Rural Buffer Districts as shown in the- Land Use Plan except as may be approved through a- Special Use Permit or a Planned. Development District. 6 .21 Mall, Soma, Standards Amended 3-18-86 6 .21 «.1 gristinz or Taw Mobile gone Parks , 4,7 a) Existing mobile home parks that do not meet the standards set forth in Articles. 5, 6 and T shall be considered nos.-conforming. Such parks shall not expand in any way,. beyond the existing developed portions, but shall be allowed to remove and replace units existing within the existing park at the time of adoption of this section. Only the replacement and location of units- on an existing mobile home space shall be permitted provided the total number of units does not exceed the number- existing at the time that the mobile home park. became non conforming; and,. provided ( 1 ) that the existing waste treatment system is functioning properly. and (21 that the space be improved is accordance with Subsection a o s' r nonce. emava an replacement of such' units shall not be considered expansion of the non conforming use. b) New mobile home parks or portions of existing mobile home parks that have been previously approved , but have not constructed substantial improvements or do not have sewage disposal systems installed on the date of adoption of this section shall meet all applicable standards for new mobile home parks as set forth in Article 5, 6 and T and any other standards required for the zoning district in which it is located . a) Substantial improvements shall include , but not be limited to , sewage disposal systems , water systems , roads , parking areas , recreational facilities and mobile home pads . 6 .2/ .2 . Mobile Homes on Indvidual Lots Amended 3-18..86 " a) Mobile homes , as principal residential buildings on individual lots , in existence at the- time of the 6-25 05 ' a. Mobile homes , as defined in Article 22 of this ordinance.. b . Caretaker 's or manager's hone or office. 0 . Service buildings and areas necessary to provide washing drying machines for domestic laundry, sanitation , rest roo storage, vending machines , and other similar services provided the facility for the use and convenience of the mobile home p tenants. d_ Recreation buildings/facilities and areas serving only the mob home parr in which they are located. e. Customary accessory buildings and facilities necessary operation of the mobile home park is which they are Located . t. Storage buildings (ma longer than 12 feet by 12 feet in base, TO feet in height) for individual mobile home spaces . g. Fenced, communal storage areas provided by the park operator boats, campers, and other accessory vehicles belonging to ps residents . h. Sales of mobite rzomes to be located within the district permitted only for mobile homes which are already located approved and established mobile homer lots or spaces . 20 .4 PnalAAMent Reoui=ements ?or Mobile some Parkg, a) Mobile home space requirements are specified below.- 1 . A mobile home park shall be divided into mobile home spaces, w. the limits of each space clearly established on the ground permanent stakes. The minimum area of a space shall be thousand ( 10 ,000) square feet per living unit; provided , hove- that the Orange County Health Department may increase the miniz area requirement for the park - and/or individual spaces who necessary to be consistent with groundwater resources and, limitations of sewage disposal systems . (See definition *mobile home space,* Article 22 of this ordinance.) The spa shall be of sufficient size to meet minimum dimensional , area separation requirements for the anticipated size and character the mobile home and any additions to be placed on the space . (: 8.8 .26 .4.4d of this section for separation requirements.) 2 . The location of the mobile home spaces on the ground shall approximately the same as those shown on the approved plans. degree of accuracy obtainable by working with a scale an the p= and than a tape on the ground is acceptable. Precise engineer or surveying of space limits is not required either on the pl:- or on the ground . 7-39 05' - a. Mobile homes , as defined in Article 22 of this ordinance. b . Caretaker 's or manager's home or office. c . Service buildings and areas necessary to provide washing' an drying machines for domestic laundry, sanitation , rest rooms storage, vending machines, and other similar services provided b the facility for the use and convenience of the mobile home par tenants. d. Recreation buildings/facilities and areas serving only the mebil home park in which they are located. e. Customary accessory buildings and facilities necessary- to operation at the mobile home park. in which they are located. t. Storage buildings (no longer than 12 feet by 12 feet in base, an 10- feet in height) for individual mobile home spaces . g. Fenced, communal storage areas provided by the park operator fo boats, campers, and other accessory vehicles belonging to par residents. h. Sales of mobile domes to be located within the district a permitted only for mobile homes which are already _ located o approved and established mobile home lots or spaces. T .20 .4 . - ' : . ,, - • ; - . . - . - 1 - : . , , _ - , a) Mobile home space requirements are specified below. 00:41/1f t... A mobile home park shall be divided into mobile home spaces, wit the. limits of each space clearly established on the ground b permanent stakes_ The minimum area of a space shall be to . thousand ( 10 ,000) square feet per living unit; provided , howeve that the Orange County- Health Department may increase the minimu area requirement for the park - and/or individual spaces wher necessary to be consistent with groundwater resources and/o limitations of sewage disposal systems . (See definition o *mobile home space," Article 22 of this ordinance.) The spec shall be of sufficient size to meet minimum dimensional , area an separation requirements for the anticipated size and character o the mobile home and any additions to be placed on the space. (Se 8.8 .26 .4.4d of this section for separation requirements.) 2 . The location of the mobile home spaces on the ground shall b approximately the same as those shown on the approved plans. Th degree of accuracy obtainable by working with a scale an the pla and then a tape on the ground is acceptable. Precise engineerin or surveying of space limits is not required either on the plan or on the ground . 7-39 . _ • 056 3 . Only one ( 1 ) mobile home may be erected on any mobile home space at one- time . 4 . Each mobile home must be placed on a permanent stand or pad built to the specifications listed below. - a. Each stand must comply with those standards specified in the - - . - , • - . . R- -ulat •ns or Mob e Ro es - f . Modular Sousing" . The remaining area of the stand (that area of the stand which extends beyond the area on which the unit has been placed) must have a base of at least three inches of compacted crushed stone, gravel, or paved slab . b . The location of each mobile home stand must be at a• elevation, distance and angle in relation to the adjapen • access drive so that placement and removal of the mobil:. home is practical by means of customary moving equipment. c . The surface of each mobile home stand or pad and the are- around it shall be graded where necessary for prope drainage. d . The following separation requirements shall pertain to ever, mobile home , single wide or double wide, within the park: 1 ) Minimum Depth of Front Yard* Twenty-five (25) feet measured from the street right-of way line .* 2) Minimum Width of Side Yard* Tea ( 10) feet . 3) Minimum Depth of Rear, Yard* Ten ( 10) feet . * The term "yard" in this context is used to describe th` placement of the mobile home within the mobile bom. space and is not a "setback" requirement as defined i . Article 22 of the Zoning Ordinance. e . No mobile home stand may be located with direct access to - public street . f. An attached structure such as an awning, cabana , storag= building , carport , windbreak , or porch which has a floo area larger than 25 square feet and is roofed will b . considered to be part of the mobile home stand for purpose - of determining separation requirements. - 5 . Each mobile home must have a permanent patio located adjacent t• 7-40 p5u or attached to the mobile home stand. The patio must. be built to the standards below. a. Each patio must be at least one hundred. eighty ( 180) square feet in area . b . Each patio must have sufficient gradient to provide Po] adequate drainage away from the mobile home stand. c. Each patio must have a well graded , well drained anc compacted base and be constructed of portland cement o: masonary. 6 . Each mobile home space shall have oft.street parking facillotie: for two (2) vehicles . Each parking space must be at least one hundred eighty ( 180) square feet in area, with a minimum width oa nine (9) feet. It must be surfaced with at least four (4) /Ache: of compacted crushed stone . 7 . A walkway (constructed of compacted wood chips, crushed stone , gravel , or concrete) must be constructed for each mobile home space to connect the parking spaces and the patio . 8 . The park must remain in unitary ownership with no sale of space to an individual . 9 . The applicant must submit a numbering/location system of the par. to the Orange County Planning Department . 10 . The applicant must submit to the Orange County Planni4 : Department tenancy rules and regulations including , but no limited to: a. Prohibiting junked and/or abandoned vehicles within the park b . Prohibiting the accumulation of rubbish. c . Prohibiting outside storage of any nature. b) Minimum Frontaaa and Setback Reauirements 1 . A mobile home park must have a minimum frontage consistent wit the requirements of the zoning district in which it is located If the proposed lot for the development of a mobile home park i a lot of record , there must be a minimum frontage of sixty (60) feet along a publicly dedicated street. 2 . The -minimum setback of the park from a public street must b consistent with the requirement of the zoning district in whic it is located . No parking is permitted in the required setback . 3 . Mobile home stands must be located at least one hundred ( 100 7-41 O R A N G E C O U N T Y BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS O6G ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date Qsigler64 286 Action g nda Item 1 SUBJECT: PROPOSED SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS TEXT AMENDMENTS DEPARTMENT; PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING X -_ Yes No Attachment( s) Information Contact: MARVIN COLLINS Proposed Text Amendments Telephone Numbers Hillsborough -- 732-8181 Durham -- 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel H i l l -- 967-9251 PURPOSE: To receive public comment on proposed text amendments to the Subdivision Regulations. . NEED: Changes have occurred in the North Carolina Uniform Plat Law which establish minimum and maximum dimensions for subdivision plats - no smaller than 8-1/2" x 11" or greater than 21" x 30" . Margin dimensions are also established -- 1-1/2" on the left border and 1/2" on all other borders. The current Subdivision Regulations allow either (a) 21" x 30" , (b) 12" x 18" or (c) 18" x 24" plat sizes. IMPACT: The amendment would eliminate confusion between the regula-- tions/requirements administered by the Planning Department and the Register of Deeds and Land Records Departments. RECOMMENDATION; Approval of amendment. WJ 061 PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS ORDINANCE: SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS REFERENCE: SECTION III - E FINAL PLAT ORIGIN OF AMENDMENT:_XSTAFF PLANNING BD. BOCC PUBLIC OTHER STAFF PRIORITY RECOMMENDATION:_X HIGH MIDDLE LOW COMMENT: To bring the ordinance provisions into compliance with the General Statutes. EXPECTED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: AUGUST 26, 1986 ********************** PURPOSE OF AMENDMENT: The proposed amendment would bring the provisions of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations into compli- ance with the North Carolina Uniform Plat Law. ISSUES/ IMPACTS: The proposed amendment would replace the current provisions for plat dimensions with a minimum/maximum provision . The amendment would eliminate confusion between the regulations/requirements of the Planning Department and the Register of Deeds/Land Records departments. EXISTING ORDINANCE PROVISION(S) : SECTION I I I -- E -- 5 a. Final Plats shall be drawn in waterproof ink on satisfactory reproducable material on sheets of the following sizes: either (a) 21" x 30", (b) 12" x 18" or (c) 18" x 24" . When more than one sheet is required to include the entire subdivision, all sheets shall be of the same size and shall show appro- priate match marks on each sheet and appropriate references to other sheets of the subdivision. The scale of the plat shall be at one ( 1 ) inch equals one-hundred (100) feet, or one ( 1 ) inch equals fifty (50) feet, whichever is most appropriate in the determination of the Planning Department-. PROPOSED AMENDMENT(S ) : REVISE SECTION III - E 5 a. to read: Final plats shall be drawn in°rer- proof ink on satisfactory reproduc- able material on sheets rn___=.1112t 30" ens mnst_Iec1i mar$1rso rer and 1/2" on a,L other b. rders . When more than one sheet is required . . . ******************* ORDINANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE: PLANNING BOARD (PRELIMINARY REVIEW) : BOCC (ADVERTISEMENT) : • 4 ORANGE COUNTY Obi BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date Oc t _j9$b , Action Agenda item , :. .. SUBJECT: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS - INSPECTION FEE SCHEDULE DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING X Yes No Attachment( s) Information Contact: Marvin Collins Existing Fee Schedule Indicating Proposed Changes Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 967-9251 PURPOSE: To receive public comment on proposed amendments to the In-- spection Fee Schedule. NEED: On July 8, 1986, an updated schedule of fees for planning, erosion control and building -inspection: services was adopted by the Board of Commissioners. Since adoption of the schedule, it has -become apparent that revisions are necessary to clarify certain fees and other "miscellaneous" schedules which were not foreseen earlier. IMPACT: The proposed amendments would clarify the application of fees to certain types of construction and plan review/approval procedures. In addition, the provision regarding "Late Fees" would be incorporated again, and all schedules containing fees ending in $ .50 would be rounded off to be consistent with the computerized permit system program. The proposed . amendments would also add fees for various "mis- cellaneous" inspections such as the moving and demolition of buildings, commercial and campaign signs, swimming pools and radio/TV towers. Fees would also be established to provide for the reimbursement of Town of Chapel Hill Engineering Staff inspecting streets, storm drainage, and water and sewer facilities constructed to Town standards. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the proposed amendment to the Inspection Fee Schedule. PROPOSED PLANNING FEE SCHEDULE 064 (Underlined text indicates proposed changes) Ordinance Amendments S 80.00 Rezoning Requests/Land .Use Plan Amendments 120.00 + 5.00/acre Zoning Permit 10.00 Minor Subdivision Application Fee 40.00 Lots on Final Plat 5.00 Each Major Subdivisions 1-5 Lots Application Fee 105.00 Lots on Final Plat 5.00 Each 6-9 Lots Application Fee 210.00 Lots on Final Plat 5.00 Each 10-25 Lots Application Fee 315.00 Lots on Final Plat 5.00 Each 26+ Lots Application Fee 420.00 Lots on Final Plat 5.00 Each Private, o Class C (Less than 5Q0 feet), 40.00 Class C (500 feet or mo;e) 60.00 Class p 60.00 Class A B0.Q0 partial; Widtb Right-of-Way 80.00 Board of Adjustment-Variance/Appeal 80.00 Special Use Permits-Airports 180.00 + 5.00/Acre -Junkyards 180.00 " 4 5.00/Acre -Kennels/Riding Stables 120.00 -Temporary Mobile Home 60.00 -Community Center 120.00 -Cemeteries 180.00 + 5.00/Acre -Day Care Facilities 120.00 -Radio/TV Towers 120.00 -Temporary Buildings 60.00 -Transmission Lines 120.00 • -Sorority/Fraternity 180.00 . + 5.00/Acre -Recreational Facilities 180.00 + 5.00/Acre -Hazardous Waste 180.00 Facilities + 5.00/Acre -Planned Developments See below -Historic Structures 120.00 -Non-Profit Educational 120.00 Cooperative -Impervious Surface 120.00 Modification -Extractive Uses 180.00 06 + 5.00/Acre -Landfill 180.00 + 5.00/Acre -Public Utility Stations 180.00 + 5.00/Acre -Group Care Facilities 120.00 Planned Developments 1-4 Units or Lots 195.00 + 5.00/Unit or Lot 5 -15 Units or Lots 430.00 + 5.00/Unit or Lot 15+ Units or Lots 640.00 + 5.00/Unit or Lot Home DcggpAtign plan Review 20,011 Major Transportation Corridor 40.00 (MTC) Site Flap Review PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL FEE SCHEDULE Erosion Control Plan (Maximum of $2,500.00) Urban 75.00/Acre Rural 38.00/Acre Grading Permit (Maximum of $10,000.00) Urban 150.00/Acre Rural 75.00/Acre PROPOSED INSPECTIONS FEE SCHEDULE U 6 C (Underlined text indicates proposed changes) LATE FEES Work performed withgpt A permit shall ha subject IQ . late .fie_ equal in amount t4 the fees specified fo,r the yToFk And .in addition theret ADDITIONAL INSPECTIONS Additional inspections may be necessary through the failure to comply with applicable code requirements and are designated "Inspection Failures" . The extra inspections fee is $20.00. This fee applies to all inspection failures and shall be paid by the permit holder before or at the time of inspection. SCHEDULE A New Residential Buildings (one and two-family) 0 - 1000 square feet $ 130.00 1001 - 1500 square feet 160.00 1501 - 2500 square feet 220.00 2501 - 4000 square feet 300.00 4001 square feet and over 340.00 - SCHEDULE B New Multi-Family Residential Buildings (Apartments, triplex, fourplex. townhouses and condominiums) First Unit 130.00 Each additional unit per building 65.00 SCHEDULE C r Residential Repairs, Renovations. Alterations, Addl ions and. Accessory Buildings $ 0 - 2000 (Structural .Changes) 40.00 $2001 and over 40.00 + 2.00/$1000 SCHEDULE D Commercial, Industrial and Non--Residential Building, Alterations and Additions $ 0 - 2000 40.00 2001 and over . + 3 .001$1000 SCHEDULE E Miscellaneous Building Inspections Mobile Home 40.00 Moving Building 40.00 -S. Building Demolition 40 .00 Change of Occupancy/Use 20 .00 (Existing Building) 06 Satellite Dish 20.00 Curtain Wall 40.00 Radio/TV Tower 20;03 Swimming Pool 20.00 Re-Issue Outdated Building Permit Same fees as for new permit Wood Stove/Fireplace 20.00 Prefabricated Utility Buildings 20.00 (Not over 500 square feet in floor area and not involving footing and/or slab construction) Campaign Signs 20.00 (Per candidate and with listing of sign locations by Tax Map, Block and Lot number/No zoning permit required) Signs - Business identification 40.Q0 and billboards not involving construction of concrete footing(s) - All other signs 20.00 SCHEDULE F Miscellaneous Electrical Temporary Service 60Amp 20.00 60A - 100A 20.00 Mobile Home 20.00 Sign Inspections 20.00 Each Gasoline Pump (All Pumps) 20.00 Load Control Device 20.00 (Per Dwelling Unit or Commercial Establishment) Miscellaneous Inspections 20.00 Each Extra Trip 20 .00 SCHEDULE G Electrical Service Changes Single Phase 30-50 Amp 20.00 60-100A 2V70 125-200A 33.00 400A 39.00 Three Phase 20-50Amp 26.00 60-100A 33.00 150-200A 39 .00 400A • 52.00 SCHEDULE H Electrical Service Single Phase Three Phase 30-50Amp 20 .00 26.00 60A 26 .00 26.00 70A 33.00 33.00 100A 33 .00 33 .00 125A 39 .00 Of:; 150A 46 .00 65 .00 200A 52.00 78.00 300A 65.00 91 .00 400A 78.00 117 .00 600A 98.00 130.00 800A 130 .00 195.00 1000A 195.00 260.00 1200A 260.00 325.00 1400A 293 .00 390.00 1600A 325.00 520.00 Over 1600A 33.00/100A 52.00/100A SCHEDULE I Plumbing New Construction or Fixture Replacement # Fixtures 1 7.00 2 10.00 3 14 .00 4 17.00 5 21.00 6 and over 21.00 + 4.00/Fixture Mobile Home 10.00 SCHEDULE J Residential Mechanical Any covered ductwork or component 60.00 (Each system) Any exposed ductwork or factory assembled 40.00 components (One system) Installation of each additional system - 10.00 Replacement of one system 40.00 Mobile Home 10.00 Multi-Family/Exposed ductwork 40.00 (Per dwelling unit) Multi-Family/Covered ductwork 60.00 (Per dwelling unit) SCHEDULE K Non-Residential/Commercial Mechanical Commercial Cooling (with separate distribution system. including installation of a complete cooling system with the distribution system. condensor. receiver, cooling tower. or evaporative condensor coils and air handling units, etc.) First Unit 40.00 Each additional unit 10 .00 Replacement of a system 40.00 Commercial Heating (Installation of a heating system including boiler, furnace, duct heater. unit heater, air handling units and air distribution system. etc.) First Unit 40 .00 06E. Each additional unit 10.00 Replacement of a system 40.00 Commercial heating and cooling (with combined system including the distribution system, boiler, furnace. ductwork. etc.) First Unit 40.00 Each additional unit 10.00 Replacement of a system 40.00 Commercial Ventilation and Exhaust Systems (includes fans. blowers and duct system for removal of dust. gases. fumes. vapors, etc.) One system 40.00 Each additional system 10.00 Hood fan commercial type cooking equipment 20.00 Commercial range or grill (each unit) 20.00 Deep fat fryer 20.00 Oven 20.00 SCHEDULE L Joint Planning Inspection Fees All projects approved under the terms of the Joint Planning Agreement between Orange County and the Town of Chapel Hill shall pay the following fees prior to the recording of a Special Use Permit or Final Plat of a major subdivision: Street and storm One percent (1%) of the drainage improvements total construction cost of those improvements to be constructed to Town of Chapel Hill standards Water and sewer Two percent (2%) of the improvements total construction cost of those improvements to be constructed to Town of Chapel Hill standards Where projects are to be built in phases, fees may be pro=rated based on the cost of improvements scheduled in each phase. - Adopted by Orange County Ord . of Commissioners 9-8--85 PLANNING FEE SCHEDULE 07C . Ordinance Amendments _ $ 80.00 Land Use Plan. Amendments 120.00 + $5-00/fie - `Zoning Permit • _ 10.00 ' Minor Subdivision _ Application Fee- 40.00 . Lots on Final Plat 75.00 Each • Major Subdivisions . - 1-5 Tats Application :Fee- 105.00 ' Lots on Final Plat - 5.00 Each _ 6-9 Lots ' Application Fee 210.00 _ Lots on Final Plat • 5.00 'Each 10-25 Lots Application Fee - -- - 315.00 . - Lots on Final Plat . . - 5_00 Each 26+ Lots Application Fee 420.00 - - Lots on.Final Plat. - - 5.00 Each Private Road, . - 40.00 - • Board of Adjustment - Variance/Appeal __ 80.00 -- - - - ' Special Use Permits - Airports 180.00 3: $5.00/acre . - Junkyards ' . _ - 180.00 3- $5.00/acre :.Kennels/Ridirng•-Stables - 120:00 - Temporary Mobile Home 60.00. _ Community Center - 120.00 - -• Cemeteries 180_00 + $5.00/acre: -- Day' Care Facilities - _ 120.00 - • - Radio/TV-Towers - _- . 120_00 ' - Temporary Buildings - 60.00 _ - Transmission Lines .:: , 120.00 - Sorority/Fraternity 180.00.4-.$5.00/acre Recreational Facilities - - 180.00 + $5.00 - - Hazardous Waste Facilities _ 180.00 4- 45-00/acre. - Planned Developments - See below - Historic. Syructures - - - 120.00 - -_ • - Non-Profit Education Cooperative 120.00 -- Impervious Surface Modification - - - 120.00 . - Extractive Uses - - *180.00 $5.00/a - Landfill .. 180.00 + $5.510/acre - - Public Utility Stations • - 180.00 + $5.00/acre 7 Group Care Facilities 120.00 - _ _ • Planned Developments - 1-4 Units/Lots . - 195.00 -4- $S.00/fait nor 1 . 5-15 Units/Lots 430.00 + $5.00/unit or 1 15+ Units/Lots - 640_10 = $5_00/unit or 1 Erosion Control Plan Dxban - 75.CCfacre . drat ' 37.50/acre. - Maximu i of-- $2,500_04 - • Grading Permit Urban 150.00facre • ` Rural. 75.00/acre I!axiunmr czE $14,000+.00 AMMMMIMIMMMM r,� - • 'Adopted by Orange County- BO d • of Commissioners 7-8-86 - . • INSPECTIONS FEE SCHEDULE - 071 •- . ADDXTIONAL INSPECTIONS - - - - - _ Additional inspections may be necessary through the failure to - • . comply with applicable• code requirements rements and are designated- - - 'Inspection Failures". The extra inspections fee is $20.08.• - _ - - - • This fee applies to all inspection failures and shall be paid = _ - • - - by the permit holder before or at the time of inspection. _ -_ - = s - « • • New residential buildings (one and two family] - _ - '- _ �~ "- ' - - • - including townhouse or condominum ownership - _ - -- - - _ _ _•• • Sr.- r - - -- --- • ' 0 --.1000 square_feet gross area -- - . ------ J 1-30_013 --- - -. - 1001 - 1500 square feet • • - -- _ _ - -_-160,00___ - • : ,•: '1501 - 2500 square feet ^ • - - __r_ • - -- X501. 4000 • - - ..---_ - _ __ 220_010 _ �- square feet. - - 300_00 - r 4001 - and over • • - - - "- -=- - _ - 340._a0 SCHEDULE B - - _ s - - • • • New multiFama ly residential buildings . - • - - - _• `t -_-1: - - • (apartments, triplex, and fourplex) - - -. _ "- -- = _ - • - • • • .Fist .Unit - - .. - .• - - _ ..- - �-- � Each additional - _ - _ :I30_00 --, tional unit per, building . _ _ =I-65100 • .- - • SCHEDULE C - - 4 - _ - • - _ _ • Residential Repairs, Renovations and - - - _ - - - - - 'Alterations _ • - - .$ 0 - 2000 (Str-.xctural Changes) -_ - _ - -- -- 40-00 . . $2001- over . _ •• - • 40.001 • • -- • - - • . .. - pl. s SCL'I�E D - - - _ - $21$I0. BED -. Commercial, Industrial and Non- _ _ • - . Residential Building - - - - - $ 0 -- 2000 - - _ 40-00 $2001 .- and over - - 40.00 • . • - . - _ - plus - • $2_50/$I0 a r - • SCHEDULE E • - _ - - - - - • • Miscellaneous Building Inspections - - - -- _ - • • Mobile Home - 40_00 • . - - - -. - 074 I SCHEDULE F - -- -_ - _ - -- - •• I Miscellaaeous.Electrical _ - - . Temporary Services • _ 60A - $ 19-30 ' • •60 - 100A . _ _ - 19:50 • Mobile Homes • • • - - _ 19-50 - - • Each extra trip •• - - - - 19-50 ' . - • Sign Inspections .- - - _ - ` 19-50 - - _ Each •gasoline pump (All pumps) - - _ - - 19-50 - - • . . Miscellaneous Inspections • - 19 5Q . - • ' � F - .r _ a___ SCRED0LE G • - - :-.s... ....- .1_=-� _- ■ _ •+ - - • _ .. .s.'; ...'• "°- -tea- • • - • • •_Electrical Service Changes - :-•- ■ - - _ - -;:,-....m....;,- ,-•• • .. - - ----� - _ _-_ . -- `'- • ==i `_`_• . Single Phase . • - _-_ '_:r- _ - . - _ - - e - --;-1--i-19-5-0 - s - . . • - ' 30 50A - - -' • _ - - _ - - " 60 IOOA - - - :-_-----r-26.00 -,=-•-_` • • 125 200A _ . . _ - _ :=� X32;50 ' _- • '400A . - - . . : - -- _ -- _ _' -' --- "--.39.00 _ - -•• -`_ r= - - _i'�` `:: = �•-'- Three Phase - - - - � ..=---;'--------4. ` _i s•` 20 -- 50A - _ - - -_ __- -- _ _ a - _.-26.00 _ -- .f.7:-.--_- - 32.50 - . • 150 200A .. . . • _ - .T a • 39.00 i= - • :400A - _ - - =-- - :52.06 - _ SciwDLE H - - - - -_ •' _ -a_ - • Electrical Single Phase and' Three Phase Single Phase - Three Phase " 30A, 40A, 50A "}_$ - 10.50 $ • -i6-0 . %, 60A •• - . • .- _ - _ '26.00 - -- - 26-0 • - • . 70A• - • - - • 32.50 - - 32_5 • 100A • • - :32.50 _ s2-5- 125A :. -• - ' -'39.00 - -� -39.0 _ .150A • . • - '''. .45.50 - 65_01 -200A - . - 52.00 _ 78_6 c - •300A: • - • - 65.00 - . 91_0 • 400A - _ 18.00 - - 1.17.0 • • 600A 9750 - --130-0 800A 130.00 ' _1'95_i _ .• 3.000A •- - 195.00 - , ._`_. 260-0 1200A 260.00 _ -325-0 . • 1400A . . - 292.50 - . _390.0- 1600A 325.00 r,r w __ ��.._ Over 160OA . - jx suer LOOA 52.'1 per- b0OA • • •��. _ - w • SCEEODLE I - •- • P1t r ing . .• • • . - New Coro. -t,.,:cr;on or Fi-xl-Lom ps "' - - • M • 1 - - - _ _ $ 1.5000rt•• • . 6 and. above- • • • w _ •• _ 3. F3-x• -- • T.. j....1-2 - - ••�• •. • - •. • .. - - - - 4 • - _ - - -- - - - _ _*•_ i_ _- • - _r _- • + • • • • • • • • • • • • 074 _ _ scnurE 0' - . • Residential Z i chan. cal - _ _ _ . _ Any covered ductwork or component (each system) - -- $ _60,.00 All exposed ductwork or factory assembled and _ - - - -- car�rents (one system) _ _ - - _ 40.00 • inst i 1 i ration of each additional. system - - _ io.00 . 1placetaet of one system . • ._ - - 1-- 40.00 _ - 40.00 mull-Farm ly - exposed ductork • Multi-Family - covered irk - _ - _ _ _ __-..t....60,00,,' • . Nor=--Re5�al/C�ci al %ohaT1. oal •• - ' - ' - - _• . - ?_e _ -r -_ _.• Cra_txrnrc_ial- cooling (with separa-L-e disc bution _ •. ,:- _a-as - -z- _',z - ' _- system, _'ne-1 vY3'ng installation of a cat fete : ._- - '¢--_ -_-j.;-_-- _▪ •¢ : __-._-r;- • cooling system with the system; " _ - -_ - = _, - . - • condensor, receiver, cooling - or _ -- _ - _ _ .__ - -i= - _ evaporative cc densor coils and air handling; - - _ _ - __ - - :-- 7-:....,-_ ---y_."`--- _-__ .4 _-F- .y - units, etc.). .. . .-• . •' = •• : . . • _ : - _ r- { i z.- = •• First Unit • • . - -- _-- _ _.- _ _ --i=`=�4G.00s- Facb additional unit - _-: -€_ ..--_--.•:. .10.00 - .Reps aim ant of a system - -~ _ ,_ - r ,-,,--_--..-.7.-.;::-•-__,_-40.:00,.. . .Cor.rercira1 Heating (Installation• of a heating - _ ___ i _ - - _ fir..:--rz-- +- system including ]:oiler, 'furnace, duct beater, - - unit heater, air handling units, and air _ - _' _ distr buta�on system, etc.) - - . . _ • First Unit- - - -740:00 •Each additional unit - _ - . - -- _ - _:; - - -- - :10_00 . , Repla�aent of a system - _ -- _ - -?. ,--_- - - 40.00 Cornmercia 1 heating and cooling (with combined - _ - -_; ___ ' • system including the distribution �, • _ - - _- - _' - .7- - __ : . boiler, furnace, ductwork, etc.) - _ - - . - • First IIriit - _ 40-00 • Each additional unit - - _ - - 10_00 Repllac°ue t of a .system - a. - - : 4o.00 • _ _ _ - = - - - — - • Ccrcercial Ventilation and Exhaust Systems - - - _ -_• (include fans, blc ers, and duct system for - - - - - _ - • removal of dust, gases, fuses, vapors, etc.) - - - -_ ` - - One system (including one fan & blower') • : - - _ -40.00 Each additional system _ _ - 10.00 . Road fan cost t-ercial type cocking equipment : - - 20.00 Ccrrarcial. Range or Grill. (each unit) _ 20.00 • Deep Fat Fryer 20_00 • Oven _ 20.00 OF COMMISStONLRS ACTION AGENDA BOARD ACTION.:AGENDA:.7'TEM ABSTRACT + •ITJM�•NQ ._ MEETING DATE October 6, 1986 . j ',:,i' SUBJECT_ Changes in fire districts t-----D—EP—A' RTMENT: Emergency Services PUBLIC HEARING: VS NO ATTACHMENT(S) : Yes INFORMATION CONTACT:. Bobby Baker k; PHONE NUMBERS:. ':••y,HILLSBOROUGH 732--811! CHAPEL HILL 929-8109; PURPOSE: To approve the removal of a portion of the White Cro $ Fire District and to add this area to the South Orange Fire District. NEED: To comply with the North Carolina General Statute ,p69.25.11 (changes in fire districts) and to honor the citizen's peti.tioh requesting changes in fire protection in this area- r IMPACT: South Orange Fire Tax Revenue would be increased ap. .: x p�Axi�,tely . $1,696.46 and White Cross Fire Tax Revenue would decrease approximately $1,995.83 RECOMMENDATION(S) : Approval of changes in fire district .. a WHITE CROSS VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT Route 1 , Box 297 Chapel Hill , North Carolina. 27514 July 15 , 1986 Orange County Board of Commissioners 106 East Margaret Lane Hillsborough , North Carolina 27278 ' Dear Commissioners : The Board of Trustees and the Board of Directors of the White Cross Volunteer Fire Department met separtely and voted separtely to release the people on the. South end of Highway 54 from the White Cross Fire District and to allow them to belong to the South Orange Fire District . Sincerely , • Wayne Wiles President • P.O.Box.337 301 "V:-/st Main Street r a r'orr!:or��,North C.mohna 27510 1E19)P.2-8541 A-j', 'te A.r,l' •t:.:•i)';t•;rt�' •r1).7 'n.F! ;`F September 3, 1986 Mr . Kenneth R. Thompson Orange County Manager Orange County Courthouse Hillsborough, N.C . 27278 Dear Ken : The Carrboro Board of Aldermen at its meeting of September 2, 1986, voted to authorize the Carrboro Fire Department to serve the area shown on the attached map as part of the South Orange Fire District. It is my understanding that the taxes for fire protection for this area will become part of the South Orange Fire District effective January 1 , 1987, and all monies collected will be forwarded to the Town of Carrboro. I also understand that the tax rate for the South Orange Fire District is $.085 per $100. 00 valuation . According to figures supplied to me by Mr . Bobby Baker , the total property tax value for this area is $1 , 975, 131 .00, which would yield $1 , 590.00 in fire district fees . I would appreciate your assistance in having this matter brought before the Orange County Board of Commissioners. Please let me know if you have any questions . Sincerely , Robert W. Morgan Town Manager RWM/scw Enclosure cc : Chief Robert Swiger Bobby Baker 07 6 NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR INCLUSION IN THE.SOUTH ORANGE FIRE DISTRICT On Monday, October 6, 1986, at 7:30 p.m., the Orange County Board of Commissioners will hold a meeting to consider application for inclusion of additional territory into the SOUTH ORANGE FIRE ,DISTRICT. This territory is presently part of the White Cross Fire District. This meeting will beheld in the Orange County Court House, 106 E. Margaret Lane, Hillsborough, North Carolina. The proposed area to be included in the South Orange Fire District ' is described generally as an area within Orange County on Highway 54, west of i, Carrboro. This area is bounded on the east by the South Orange Fire District and extends approximately one (1) mile in all directions from Highway 54. The . area is bounded on the north, west and south by the White Cross Fire District as shown on the map below. A detailed map showing the proposed area to be added to the South Orange Fire District is available for inspection by all citizens between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday in the office of the Clerk of the Board of Commissioners. This office is located on the second floor of the Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina. All interested citizens are invited to appear at the Commissioners meeting on October 6, 1986. Anyone wishing. to be heard on this matter will be heard by the Commissioners at that time. . This the 15 day of September, 1986. Don Willhoit, Chairman N}.. ` Hc1 C�t �;{ ��v a�' YCAb /ice a ji' , 1 17 _ I • 1103 P m w \ r u ��, 1 1 aw q_ p?��, .O ?' �J/`\ .. 5 s r _ 4c. Ner' � y.nom. • \�e/ .„,.0 e: • , : Th......-- ,, , Y rj Q$ t o .` 01 W <'i'':, ti - . .----- __do. :. 1_ ,__ AIIIIIN ttik\NAktill----4"Pwew ca. -—cia_ 77: . -- — _.... LANE O ` dam- �1— .1975 � 5q • X111'7 White Cts �� `� =a BWa�K,IELO��. i:. �.. 2 6::::... i g• • •, ��' N :13;2:0 VAR I . k 99 �" 7 0 w h ti2 V'_ 4 ' r�.. OLD , \ ( J any S - cis .yam, ���\ _.�I"� . \ 2 f (. ,-'". 1 /ry LX I -- ` -°emu- i V t, \:,,. 4 1 y II _ 07; ', r .r= ' EXISTING SOUTH ORANGE FIRE I DISTRICT BOUNDARY Irk,. ..17 O a n _ �.k `7.1!'•iIJY;,:�..h:, ": ::h lNi- .•f �Y."__ .,._y 4 ...• eu •- - . fit-.. , ,..�,i b' 1 i _,I $ .. a i _ l y I frto :I r `.:i •: ... «::., . :. • V • ° w. '.i'. :N,. 1.0, < 1 4 ; `r 1•I_ _a_�� .. N 1 Ong c1 M :Y qp -� NN �J a O C ..Q K I Q -e ti o 4 A 0 ,\`� Y O n ' '...'......- '..."-* ..,or-iick. !...vi..144........ . - '11'...?,:s.`.. ";.- : g '9111°.'.V .- Y y N I `:j 4F1 �� ■ " 'itS O2/ _ _ '3)`� \ a n� r \ \ °a t0 cne+ r �� ���NJJJ40 •a• c U n ,o Q CI w I w I e z z� • _ x v�cn ca I.._... ..ffm 4...,.A0.1.____g !,:. z►. a •W:1; !All e O M . (D O d CD g ad gl 6 ' 4 , i1 , ......_. _, •• I as q - ,} , ° J � Ir�l..- �� • '(=)�? M1 u) VQ r / I I �� ®ti ® � -LS Q ; ! / _� . m __67\w, M1 O' F • 1• >R ' I 1111P-- 19-/-) , Q 08 ORANGE COUNTY Action. Agenda BOARD OF COI4MISSIONERS It No. F. - ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT MEETING DATE OCTOBER 6, 1986 . I Subject: ADDITION TO STATE ROAD SYSTEM I Depart ent: MANAGER_'S OFFICE I Public Hearing= yes I DO � l Attachments: Information Contact: County Manager X501 NC DOT LETTER/PETITION Phone Numbers: 732-8181, 968-4501, 221-0231 PURPOSE: To consider a petition for addition of a road to the state-maintained secondary road system. NM NC DOT has forwarded a petition recommending the addition of Governor - Burke Road in Wilkerson Acres Subdivision - Section II and Section III to the state maintained secondary roads system. - IMPACT: Addition of the road to the state system will .provide for public- dedication and maintenance of the road. • RECON iDATION: Forward a recommendation to NC DOT that the road be added to the. state maintained secondary roads- system. 081. - REC'D 15 �., SEP 1986 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Graham, NC 27253-0766 JAMES G. MARTIN GOVERNOR September 9, 1986 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS JAMES E. HARRINGTON SECRETARY Orange. County Mr. Kenneth R. Thompson, County Manager Orange County 106 East. Margaret Lane Hillsborough, NC 27278 Subject: Petition for Addition - Governor Burke Road in Wilkerson Acres Subdivision - Section II and Section III Dear Mr. Thompson: Attached is Form SR-4, Secondary Road Addition In- vestigation. Report, for Governor Burke Road in Wilkerson Acres Subdivision - Section II. and Section III. This is being forwarded to you for review by your Board of Commissioners. Yours very truly, M. Mills C;; DISTRICT ENGINEER /jbh At.ta. cc: Mr. J. W. Watkins An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer NORTH CAROLINA STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION O 8k DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS SECONDARY ROAD ADDITION INVESTIGATION REPORT • County orm,,,s Co. File No. Date Townshipsbossush Div. File No. _ Local Name tbvernor lurks Road Subdivision Name Wilkerson Acres Section II and III Length 0.27 Width 36' D. to D. _ Type I Condition Good Is this a subdivision streetilub4e04s the const ction requiremen for such streets? yes Recorder m_0gum75 Book Page 11A Is this a subdivision street subject to participation paving? Yes Number of homes having entrances into road 6 Other uses having entrances into road I Church Does right-of-way obtained meet present Division of Highways requirement? Yes If not, why? Is petition (SR-1 ) attached? Yes Is the County Commissioners ' Approval (SR-2) attached? If not, why? Does the road meet present minimum Division of Highways construction requirements? Yes .If not, state what is needed to place the road in an acceptable maintenance condition under Remarks and Recommendations. Is a map attached indicating information for reference in locating road by the Planning Department? Tee Cost to place in acceptable maintenance condition: Total Cost $ """"' Grade, drain, stabilize $ ~"- , Drainage $ `"""— Other $ Remarks and Recommendations Meets minimum requirements. Recommend addition. Reviewed and approved Board of Transportation Member Reviewed and approved _ J. W. Watkins • 4t. , lis DIVISION ENGINEER DISTRICT ENGINEER (Do not write in this space - For use of Secondary Roads Dept. ) Petition No. (Do not write in this space - For use of Planning Dept. ) Form SR-4 (7-77) I rO8 _ _ 671„ 19� 1 I 1ID74 tfs•w• dD'. °j ow 1 7 �1.' 5 1;5 r7 0 9 ' S,� I ,''i1J ��e .y LLU -_'-.-- 1 r „ .. r 100, r, s7Q ,�,� i 1.0. I 7 'o- i i 1� 1103 .-'.1 I- ^, / + V 1 `. 1 7 l� r / �1; �+ 1 113. 1 1,1-14. 6 _: . / !71P" i` 'I 1 ql ,700 r IZ0Z 1 • \ '1 ! ...•••••'• !6 f 'LW-. l •' 7 '. 1 .9 . --- ..•= Y M 1' 'no \ 1"�+, •+ '" ^ .. ♦ N 1 �, 15]3♦` 159 1 1+µT/ 4% 151 b ^,/r r 1`r?��17Q1 J3D. /`1 1`^� ` u 1ST(;��.r ��,• \�I,,�f� 11517.1_6`• ! \ ]3i> ... 5 1 /��r '.y � .v ��•-- /' .L5 ♦ls�.I 1 1D y'y7 111 y \ ' �7ry! a 10 40 a 1.110 ..•B \ Iso. / l\ < < J 1 / rkC '1 178.E •4 3 :.,L7 .b: \., ,; / :.1�I.0 .1 2,1 '. -_-_j COR 1306 i_41' 0 I 7,r" /;'°--;r i L321 Zr '- 51 1.5 • 6 / _� 57/. ♦�l_tal 1_519 tat 1 Y r__ / ~ I!7R0�. :� 1577 I 1304 !1740 1701. 1 \ r' r7 _1 ^ l9 .. 15]1_'4 • -' m las V yr v Li�� 9 4 ry �� I�`i ' !sai J J,1 _ Ai-. 1601 ^ 1 Caldwell-- O • McOedv % r �\ 1349 a.o !..53?" P 113»j- 1.0 !.3R1 / 1� J309 a /� 1 1^ . .a 1 d -•-.i . _ `�� /'ads 1.7.14��� >t"' •� 1392=�5ia7 `.�r7 r14-61. ti ;`J L1711-. J /RI1/SR;I - ` 05 a !7?l 1l -C a,/ n 1928•._ "m PAS r i 1 /I..-: .F:i Eno QI,1 `"� 1.L3 n�` 07 1R5! >92R1 -1979 ' 7 -1 1901: 9/1306 1 7 die. l 1 i a , 7, •� r� - ICY 1 .7 1.'•.-a7 v ? Is4.G o.1 332. �• loo$.1719- 0 h . 0/ '7d 1. •,lit 1347 �_ l i1sp7 1 1 _us, 1 S2S j IS�V '-�- 1,8 I 4 3!J 1 1 .7 1.1 100! -5 `, As Fr- ---------. �� "`-. ! ,a ti a Grave .�' ° •�9- 1 1 • 1 +pi 40 / �� / 1 !. !1 ♦�. - loo' 1313 i r ''N Mr.Zero --- < \l / .- JJ !. o '�'.1, Ch. Mt S7!R r'' 1S1P: ?, /v / 1]81 y LAKE r -'R'' Sd11v M..-3 1,1 r / I i 513�� �.�, n ..>a "ORANC la23 y• Kalmedy . 11 .4I!I_L r /• y �RlI�S a sae i•� ...p ' M.♦• .1731 14 '71792 ^--- ti3 ;?`1 A r .5 ,7/ I w1• - 9Y a �` 57 7•J ♦ !I ^ 'i j --8 ''a ,(33'• 1740 1914 3 r -13,3.~ .-i,,Fairfield i 13134 ;,1 , ]337 ] 1 -1� / .e ..yq 1 - M ti1 '! .9�. New Shoran ..���� 1,5.'1 L.barlan ; .-`,`/ ° `wit ..1_..„. ,,S .v' 7'4, 27 �, CII. 1 .. * -4YryJM-1.53M. ♦ I (":12a 1 'f H 133 r�t r l]IS Ch. m1 _ i }�I� , (66 'K,:co.BURKE'S Fw5 ,ll .5 L4 i a Ilk♦ 9 _ n r j` , � - GWYe 0 •; �P_x r a Ebenezer 1 -1113 0/ I' aL_� .a t� 1 4 y ].M* 1 3 F. �/iTT_? 1770 it1 4 /.1.1E7. 1 i I 17E7 .� 14 / 144Q A 'dl ;1. � I :1" 1306 a r 8 1�__d__ �`""„^;.�•.�;13.9.. ` / �i l831. 'l.77J: - �r 1 9l ��. i --- 11 .7r.1a • l � r 0, , � r 1364 '2_12 140d-'��'x ia7t. s.�n,,.13_ :P 11 j' FMRV1eW '� HILLS- . ~159.A3� LQ43 J891 V pop.,,, a:;>. BOROUGH Wiftic--7"..Z.", 1. ::. �r / S • �. R O\..4.`:y, \ / r 1 . ... - �� r!ri •rrl,°^M .! .�;:.':,yl�4' L,1LR 6 - 1. � �•YY�► -i 1120 t a •,;::.1 .r 1 } ""' 13ev . .141 '11•, =". r r ■` �.' :S �Q. .4r V 1501 \� ti9 ' 1 1504. �./ 1 '1,11‘'‘v 'l _ / I '!`' 1 A; 6 fps '.' 0 , la�� 110+: ♦� •N� " 1 /1 1 •i1�, ^�l��r / 309 `F .'rte- -+∎1 r 1 .� 1¢vz "., 1- ( �� '1150 q; / ` 1347 .;t�'R�� r ?� IT!? 1587 -.� i 3v_ / �, /" r.` 1.i P 4,, `t, 19.5 �� � n 71 1144 ,1 41 1 DUKE'i el' �l 117 'd13i!•-- .P,.�� _ :\ L t��e '•.i1 i. 1.3 --„, B5 1 / / f 1�a� • 811e4hore _ - n• !1 I11_�0 N ∎:FOREST:;.. r17+r• 1ez . ..1r. N ' - 2 \ ._ :'i:.s1 9 '' 7j!',131 ��".: 70 TO .L-� _ � � .1 I ry`♦ i t�q 1 N -. .`'::, J/ L71R v 1Zli ' p. t ".� ; ry I -Y Itoo �T ` v y:IJ31 .�- .e \ t 1\��.'1Z27. 'r� � If�3 lzf•�� Q4Z ,1.15 ' ,1.9 ` �9 t_7A7•,•�.. .y `,,,'1 '. 725 -' .S " ll73- '- 14131 k..-' `.'" ::''' O 1006 1 h 1 •� 1910 G 1.11? .. h" d 0. ;Ib !094 '>�3 1Yv3y 17r/ 17 6A'/y 1 Ne1.6 „i„,, ' , r sr 1 1 \ r a:7,i8.e 1 d z' 1 +. 4+'g,lik .,- 171 x' 9d 10 Lues\ LISA o `• V IlR3' -` 1Z77 l•,�` ,31_...1'14.... • 1r::'.:.!:..:. . �, ,.. - b3 't 7 e Blackwood Stal+un .i p17KE"+ / /�:r:.,.�...:, .r.7.. 1llI. 1 --_-- \ id r^ f? .113 ?� sq. /1� '`_:♦-6 f�' lr -I- 112? .C'1. I ;..FOREST• .7r . • � 11306 -. r �T,, _; .;':;:;'.'::! -LUZ I ]1306 4':: b■ �, Orono q• - 1 21� �w 1]132 ! 3 ` il\ v ' _ .:! 171s i� F Grow CO lJ a s:: ::r: ii��'AM'' 5? _ 1177 • +.g A13- ]]24 !8{.g FORES � .. w / z 11.E Bras '. 4, diT_I .'.n . , 'I is - �• soy 5122 ®Cra3•roach I 1 177 -FAU::1 - w\1 3 q.ll41 I•'" CT;.,..«!.e: `ems i� 1 �T3,/' Neer 1 n7 li1g• .I ..•.P.,'1!, •} :. .,--, la ( v y0 >R� ; .a - - �.LL3 ' 5• Oala �! = '191 ` ; rya. -•__'J,\ `` i.n 7n1 1. 542Q- r s 1 K, 1 c f:•:: tj 1121 (1 084 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agenda Item No. F"A ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: OCTOBER 6, 1986 SUBJECT: CHANGE ORDER FOR CARR BUILDING DEPARTMENT: COUNTY MANAGER PUBLIC HEARING: Yes X No ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: MANAGER'S OFFICE,X501 TELEPHONE NUMBER: Hillsborough - 732-8181 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 Mebane -- 227-2031 Durham - 688 -7331 PURPOSE: To consider a change order for a credit on the roof metal gage from 24 gage to 26 gage. Secondly, to add the removal of 500 square feet of terrazzo tile. NEED: Item One. The 24 gage metal roof was specified because it was unknown that the existing roof had a plywood decking. Item Two. The terrazzo tile is one inch higher than the existing floor and needs to be removed; this could not be detected before partitions were removed. IMPACT: The credit of the roof gage change is $7,995. 00 and the tile removal is $334. 00 giving a net credit of $7, 661. 00 RECOMMENDATION(S) : To approve this change order. CHANGE 0 8 Distribution to: ORDER OWNER 1..1 . ARCHITECT El • AMA DOCUMENT 6701 CONTRACTOR Et FIELD ❑ • OTHER ❑ PROJECT: Carr Building Renovation CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 1 . (name, address) Corbin St. Hillsborough, NC INITIATION DATE: 9_29-86 . TO (Contractor): `- ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NC): 5568 D.W. .Ward Construction Co. I CONTRACT FOR: General Construction • P.O. Box 15157 Durham, NC 27704 L J CONTRACT DATE:August 13, 1986 You ar(•directed to make the following changes in this Contract: Item One Reduce thickness of metal roof to 26 gauge Credit $7,995.00 Item Two Remove section of terrazzo floor topping Extra 334.00 Resultant Change Order Amount Credit $7,661.00 \ut r.rlid unlit sigrwd by hall, du.(Miler and Ar(hitect. tir);n.ourr'II Ihr• ( IInt I'M I,u' indicalvs hi' agreement herewith, in,hiding any adiusenvnl in the Contract Sum or (•ontr,nI lino•. The original (Contract Sum) (,fi(kail(c%,fl/Ar'tt( r4/0/1.1411/was $ $221,856.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders $ _0_ The (C=ontract Sum) (/C/U.l�rir/additliVa 1414/�vi, >AI(prior to this Change Order was / $ 221,856. The (Choir..( Sum)A(fvi,/rtitiLld,I�,� �iUdr/i/(/c/sr!)/will be /i/irlrLrt il/ (decreased)/�y{r/(/(■Mir/r by this Change Order $ 7,661. The new (Contract Sums/(/ yF/1)(I A1j1.y4(1(i/1/t/ryffrn including Ibis Change Order will he $ 214,195. • The Contract Time will be r I 1/ic h/e/i/9FY (unchanged) by ( -0- ) Days. The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is February 27, 1987 . • Authorized: CHR Associates, PA D.W. Ward Construction Co. County of Orange � I I ( I (OV A(:IR OWNER Airport Road lOub Co rrrn inic-a-inn Dri . 106 F_ MarefgrPt Lane \rkhe...• Address Address . Chapel Hill, NC 27514 Durham, NC 27704 Hillsborough, NC 27278 It1•..-- _ InY — —.�. _ By __---_____ __.. DAIL I)AIi • AIA UOCUMCNT 6711l (I1:\N(;( I)1(I)I I AI'F:II I'I;It 11)111(IN • AI.\'" 1478 II11 AMI KluAN Iv,1IIult.Or AR(Iulrurs, 174■ NI.\V VI)RI; Ayr-, `.\\•-.tv.•01IIN(,I()ti, DA-. 200111' C701 ---1978 Oft ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action A enda Item No. ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: OCTOBER 6, 1986 SUBJECT: APPRAISAL SERVICES CONTRACT DEPARTMENT: COUNTY MANAGER PUBLIC HEARING: Yes X No ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: MANAGER'S OFFICE,X501 CONTRACT TELEPHONE NUMBER: Hillsborough - 732-8181 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 Mebane - 227-2031 Durham - 688-7331 PURPOSE: To consider approving Appraisal Services Contract for the Efland Sewer Project. NEED: On September 16, 1986 the Board authorized the County Attorney to begin condemnation proceedings to secure sewer easements for the Efland Sewer Project. A requirement of the condemna- tion process is the determination of just compensation for each easement. Kathy Buck, Chapel Hill Appraiser, has agreed to provide an analysis of the fair market value of each taking (25 easements) at a fee of $150. 00 per parcel. IMPACT: Expeditious completion of the appraisal process would facili- tate timely condemnation proceedings. RECOMMENDATION(S) : Award Appraisal Services contract to Kathy Buck at a total amount not to exceed $5, 000. AGREEMENT for APPRAISAL SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACQUISITION OF LAND between COUNTY OF ORANGE, NORTH CAROLINA and KATHLEEN K. BUCK, APPRAISER ROUTE 5, BOX 90 CHAPEL HILL, N.C. ARTICLESS OF AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of 19 by and between the County of Orange, North Carolina (herein called the "COUNTY") and Kathleen K. Buck, Appraiser, North Carolina (herein called the "APPRAISER") . W I T N E S S E T H: THAT WHEREAS, the COUNTY is considering making sewer improvements in the Efland Community; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY in implementing this project pro- poses to secure sewer easements in the Efland Community (herein called the "Project Area") and desires that the APPRAISER furnish an appraisal of certain properties; and WHEREAS, the APPRAISER represents that he/she is author- ized and qualified to do such work and is familiar with recognized appraisal practices, with standards required for determining values, particularly in eminent domain proceed- ings, with negotiation procedures in the acquisition of real property, and has the ability to complete the work in a successful and timely manner; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY has likewise indicated its desire to engage the APPRAISER to render professional services and assistance in connection therewith; and NOW, THEREFORE, the COUNTY and the APPRAISER, in consi- deration of these premises and of the mutual convenants herein set forth, do mutually agree as follows: SECTION I PROPERTY TO BE APPRAISED A description of the real property to be appraised, including an identification of any interest in the real property to be specifically excluded from appraisal, are set forth in the attached Exhibit A. A separate appraisal is to be furnished for each "parcel." The term "parcel" means any tract or contiguous tracts of land in the same ownership, whether any such tract consists of one or more platted lots or a fractional part of a lot. An easement or other separately held interest in two or more parcels shall be considered to be a separate parcel for appraisal purposes and an exception to the title to the parcels so encumbered. An easement in a parcel that is appurtenant to another parcel to be acquired by the COUNTY shall be considered to be part of such other parcel and an exception to the title of the parcel encumbered.) Each parcel shall be considered to include all right, title, and interest of the owner in or to any adjacent or abutting streets, alleys, or other public rights-of-way. SECTION II PURPOSE AND BASIS OF VALUATIONS O8 t 1. Purpose of Significance of Appraisals . The appraisals to be furnished under this agreement are required by the COUNTY for its guidance in making fair and impartial determinations of possible damages and the just compensation to be offered to each property owner. The APPRAISER shall be guided by those objectives when estimating values. Appraisal reports will be reviewed carefully by the COUNTY. Accord- ingly, the text of each appraisal report must cover all matters germane to the required valuation findings and must provide a full explanation of the APPRAISER'S reasoning and his analyses of the evidences of value, so that a reviewer will be able to follow the APPRAISER'S analyses and understand how he reached his valuation conclusions. 2. Appraisal Standards . The Appraisals under this agreement shall be based on nationally recognized appraisal standards and techniques to the extent that such principals are consistent with the concepts of value and the rules on the admissibility of evidence of value under the eminent domain law of the State. Factors relating to race, color, religion, sex or national origin, or to racial, religious and ethnic identification of neighborhoods are not relevant to the estimation of value and shall not be considered in connection with appraisals of residential real property. 3. Date of Valuation . The APPRAISER'S valuation shall be as of a date concurrent with the preparation of his report, unless the COUNTY has specified some other date of valuation. 4. Influence of Proiect on Property Value In forming his Opinion(s) , the APPRAISER shall disregard any decrease or increase in the fair market value of the real property to be acquired, prior to the date of valuation, caused by the project for which the property is to be acquired, or by the likelihood that the property would be acquired for such project, other than that due to physical deterioration within the reasonable control of the owner. (In the case of a partial acquisition, using the before-and-after method of valuation, the APPRAISER'S opinion of the value of the remaining not-to-be-acquired portion of the property shall reflect any increase or decrease in value attributable to the project.) If the determination of changes in value caused by the project is a problem, the APPRAISER'S report shall cite the ruling followed and its source and shall explain the effect of the ruling on his opinion of value. SECTION III SCOPE OF SERVICES The APPRAISER agrees to perform the following services: 1. Appraisals . Appraise each parcel comprising part of the real property described in SECTION I of this agreement and deliver to the COUNTY are (1) original and two (2) copies of the appraisal reports conforming to the provisions of this agreement. The time delivery for these appraisals shall conform to the provisions of SECTION VI. 2. Property Inspection . Personally inspect each parcel, including all buildings, structures, improvements, fixtures, appurtenances, and other elements of value thereon or belonging thereto. The APPRAISER shall give the owner an opportunity, by reasonable advance notice in writing or otherwise, to accompany the APPRAISER, or to have his desig- nated representative accompany the APPRAISER, during his detailed inspection of the property. In the process of inspecting property, the APPRAISER shall, to the extent practicable, ascertain the rights of all parties in posses- sion and note for consideration all factual information and • comments furnished by the owner or his representative rele- vant to the appraisal. If the APPRAISER'S inspection or investigation disclosses a sale of a portion of a parcel by an unrecorded contract of sale or otherwise, the APPRAISER -2- shall furnish separate reports for each separately owned portion of the parcel. If another APPRAISER is also to O 8 appraise the same property, the APPRAISER may make his inspection with such other appraiser, but must otherwise prepare his appraisal report independently. 3. Valuation Data Make such investigations, studies, and property inspections as are appropriate to enable the APPRAISER to derive sound conclusions and to prepare the appraisal reports to be furnished under this agreement. The APPRAISER shall ascertain the most recent sale of each property appraised and any other sales of such property during the last five years or in accordance preced- ing the appraisal and shall investigate any recent offer or offers of the owner to sell his property. Such sale or sales of the property appraised and all recent sales of other properties that are sufficiently comparable to the property being appraised to be considered by the APPRAISER in forming his opinion of fair market value shall be verified insofar as practical. Each such verification shall include inspecting the property and interviewing the seller, buyer, agent, or other person, who participated in the transaction, to ascer- tain the consideration paid, the terms and conditions of the sale, any special factors affecting the amount of the sale price, and the actual character and condition of the property at the time of sale. 4. Testimony in Judicial Proceedings . Testify as an expert witness in behalf of the COUNTY in any judicial proceedings involving any property appraised under this agreement. Such services shall include such reasonable time as may be required for reinspection of the property, updating the APPRAISER'S valuation, participation in pre-trial con- ferences with counsel for the COUNTY, and testifying in the judicial proceeding. Such services shall be compensated in accordance with SECTION VI. 5. Modification of Delivered Appraisal Reports Modify or furnish supplements to any appraisal report fur- nished hereunder, without additional cost to the COUNTY, if (a) applicable principles of law with respect to the valua- tion of the property require the modification or supplement- ing of such appraisal, (b) material omissions, inaccuracies, or defects in the appraisal report are discovered after delivery and acceptance of the report by the COUNTY, or (c) the APPRAISER receives or becomes aware of relevant addi- tional 'appraisal information in existence prior to the date the APPRAISER signed the report. If there is a significant delay between the date of valuation and the date of acquisi- tion of any parcel or if the property has. been materially altered since the appraisal by a fire, a revised determina- tion of the boundaries or the interest to be acquired, or other cause, the APPRAISER shall, if requested by the COUNTY, furnish the COUNTY a supplementary report updating his valuation and the supporting data and analyses to a current date. The compensation for such updating of an appraisal shall be determined in accordance with any applicable provi- sions of this agreement. 6. Reservations in Owners . Furnish the COUNTY, if requested by the COUNTY the APPRAISER'S estimate of the value of any right or interest proposed to be reserved by the owner in a property appraised by the APPRAISER, including such reservations as mineral rights, an easement for access to other property of the owner, the right to continue occupancy for an extended period after the COUNTY acquired the pro- perty, or the right to remove any building, structure, fixture or other improvement, or a part thereof, at the owner's expense and without cost to the COUNTY. The compen- sation to be paid to the APPRAISER for furnishing any such valuations, and such data and analyses as may be required to support the valuations shall be determined, as applicable, in accordance with the provisions of SECTION VI. -3- 7. Retention of Appraisal Records . Retain a copy of each appraisal report and all notes and records germane to the appraisal for three years after delivering the appraisal report to the COUNTY or until the property is acquired by the COUNTY or its proposed acquisition of the property is aband- oned, whichever is the later. 09i 8. Consultation with COUNTY . Advise and consult with the COUNTY and its legal counsel regarding services performed and to be performed by the APPRAISER and the real property acquisition aspects of the COUNTY plan and programs as related to the properties involved in this agreement, at such time or times as may be mutually convenient for the parties to this agreement, without additional charge to the Agency. The APPRAISER shall initiate such consultations whenever he is in doubt as to whether an element of property is real or personal property or needs legal advise on any aspect of the appraisals to be furnished under this agreement. There shall be no charge by any party for such consultations except as may be outlined in SECTION VI. SECTION IV CONTEXTS OF APPRAISAL REPORTS Each appraisal report to be furnished by the APPRAISER under this agreement shall contain certain information and the APPRAISER'S conclusions and opinions, together with the data and analyses by which they were derived, as set forth below. A separate report shall be submitted for each parcel. However, if more than one parcel is to be appraised, all general data may be included in separate data volume that is referenced in the separate appraisal reports on the indivi- dual parcels. The appraisal reports on each parcel shall include the following: 1. Appraisal Summary A cover sheet headed "Appraisal Report for the County of Orange, North Carolina that provides the following: a. Project name and number. (To be provided by County) . b. Date of report. c. Parcel number, address of the property, brief identification of the interest in the property appraised, and the name of the owner of owners. d. Date or dates of the APPRAISER'S inspection of the property with the owner, owners, or the owner's designated representative, including the name of each owner or representative of an owner who accompanied the APPRAISER during his inspection and the interest held in the property or representative capacity of each such person. Identify any owners of a compensable interest in the property, who were not present or represented during the APPRAISER'S inspection, including identification of the inter- est in the property held by each such owner. e. The APPRAISER'S estimate of the fair market value of the property and the fair market value of the same interest in the land, if vacant. f. Any other fact or conclusion from the APPRAISER'S report which the COUNTY requests the APPRAISER to include on the summary page. -4- g. The limiting conditions of the appraisal, which may include assumptions (1) that the title is good and marketable, (2) that no responsibility is assumed by the APPRAISER for legal matters, especially those affecting the title to the property, (3) that the legal description of the property 091 and the interest therein to be appraised, furnished to the APPRAISER by the COUNTY, is correct, and (4) that no survey of the property has been made. Any other appropriate assumption or limiting condition may be added if it has been specifically approved in writing by the COUNTY. h. The certifications of the APPRAISER (1) that he personally made a thorough inspection of the property, (2) that, to the best of his knowledge and belief, everything contained in the report is true and no relevant and important fact has been omitted, (3) that neither his employment nor his compensation is contingent on the valuation reported, and (4) that he has no past, present, or prospective interest (including that of real estate agent or broker) in the property, the parties involved, or any other interest that would conflict in any way with services performed or the making of an impartial report. i. A certification that, in the APPRAISER'S opinion, the fair market value of the property is (an amount to be stated) as of (the date of valuation determined in accordance with SECTION II 3 of this agreement). j. The signature of the APPRAISER. 2. Ownership. The name and address of the owner of the property and the name and the address, if known of any other party known or beleived to hold a separate compensable interest in the property. For any party listed as holding a separate compensable interest in the property, furnish a description of the interest when providing the property delineation in accordance with SECTION IV of this agreement. 3. Delineation of Property. The street address of the property and an accurate legal description of the real property and the interest therein appraised. The property description shall identify all conditions, restrictions, easements, servitudes, and reservations affecting the title, but not mortgages, special assessment levies, or other liens securing the payment of indebtedness or claims against the owner. The property delineation shall specifically exclude and describe any separately held interest in the real property, which under the definition of "parcel" in SECTION I of this agreement is to be appraised and acquired either separately or as an appurtenance of another parcel to be acquired. The description shall also specifically exclude all separately held interests which are not acquired and will not be affected adversely by the COUNTY'S project. If there are any separately held interests in a parcel, such as leaseholds, tenant-owned improvements, life estates, easements, and water gas, oil, or mineral rights, furnish a description of each separate interest comprising part of the property appraised and the name of its-owner. 4. Off-Record Title Information. Information with respect to outstanding interests or instruments affecting the title, but not of record, such as leases, contracts of sale, and other interests or rights of parties in possession. Such information shall be reported, and if the facts obtainable by inquiry and inspection are sufficient, the APPRAISER'S report shall be based on such additional title information and so noted in the appraisal report. Otherwise, the APPRAISER shall refer the matter to the COUNTY and defer completion of the appraisal until the question is resolved. 5. Inventory of Improvements. An inventory identifying each building, structure, or other improvement, including movable and immovable building equipment and other fixtures considered to be part of the real property. For the purpose of delimiting the real property improvements, any building, structure, fixture, or other improvement, which would be real property if owned by the owner of the land, shall be considered to be real property notwithstanding the right or obligation of a tenant, as against the owner of any other interest in the real property, to remove such building, structure, fixture or other improvement, at the expiration of his term. The ownership of any improvement by anyone other than the land owner shall be identified on the inventory. In the case of a commercial, industrial, institutional, governmental, or farm property involving substantial quantities and kinds of fixtures, such as machinery and equipment, a property analysis shall be made in accordance with Paragraph 4.6 hereof. The property analysis shall be submitted to, and be approved by the COUNTY before completing the appraisal and, as approved by the COUNTY, shall be included as an exhibit in the APPRAISER'S report. -5- 6. Property Analysis. A property analysis when required in accordance with Paragraph 5 hereof. The property analysis shall list, identify, and classify as to ownership and type of improvement, all items of physical property considered to be part of the real property. The property analysis shall also identify tangible personal property located on the premises to the extent reasonably necessary to prevent misunderstandings as to what is regarded as 0 9 being real or personal property. Buildings including appurtenant movable building equipment, structures, other improvements, and fixtures, including their accessories and spare parts, shall be identified and classified as to ownership and type of property as follows: a. Ownership (1) Owner of the land (2) Each tenant in occupancy (3) Each nonoccupant owner of any fixtures or other improvements, or personal property on the premises. b. Type of property (1) Building, structure, or other fixed improvement (2) Building equipment, movable (3) Fixtures, classified as to whether economically movable for reuse, movable for salvage only, or immovable (4) Personal property, identified as to types and approximate amounts, or otherwise, as needed to obviate misunderstandings as to the classification of any item. If any building, structure, or other improvement, is not to be acquired, will not be adversely affected by the COUNTY'S project, and will not be required by the COUNTY to be removed, such as a pipeline in an easement not be•acquired, such improvement shall be identified as excluded from the appraisal. 7. Property Data. Description of the property, including information pertinent to the appraisal with respect to such matters as (a) the environment and location of the property, (b) the zoning and any restrictive covenants, conditions, or servitudes affecting the available use or occupancy of the land, (c) the assessed value of the real.property and the current annual real estate tax burden, (d) the use and occupancy of the property at time of appraisal, (e) the public improvements, services, and utilities serving and providing access to the property, (f) the character, topography, dimensions, and area of the land, (g) the freedom of the property from or susceptibility to special hazards, (h) the current rental and rental history of the property, if rented, (i) the estimated annual costs of ownership and for operation and maintenance of the property, and (j) a description of the buildings, structures, fixtures, and other improvements if any, appurtenant to the land, including relevant information as to type of improvement, designed use, construction materials and finish, equipment, dimensions, floor area, age, condition, space or room arrangement, functional utility, and any other characteristics or attributes of the improvements germane to the value of the real property. The appraisal report shall contain a sketch plat showing the shape and dimensions of the land, the location of the principal improvements on the land, the location of any easements in the land, and the abutting streets, alleys, or other public rights-of-way. The report shall also include such exterior and interior photographs, each clearly identified, as are appropriate as part of the description of the property. 8. Legal and Title Matters Affecting Value. Report of any official citations or personal observations by the APPRAISER of any condition or occupancy of the property in violation of law and any other legal or title matters affecting the available lawful uses or the value of the property. 9. Highest and Best Use. The APPRAISER'S opinion as to the highest and best use for the property. The appraisal reports shall also include the APPRAISER'S opinion as to any variations of such use and any other uses or kinds of use for which the property is reasonably suitable or adaptable. Any differences between the APPRAISER'S estimate of highest and best use and the actual use of the property at the time of valuation shall be explained. If the highest and best use is self-evident and not materially different from the actual existing use, a statement to that effect will suffice. However, if the property is unused vacant land or the highest and best use if found to differ significantly from -6- 094 the present use, the appraisal report shall contain the analyses by which the APPRAISER reached his conclusions as to the highest and best use and as to the relative suitability or adaptability of the property for any other available uses for which the property could reasonably be considered to be suitable or adaptable. The analysis of. a potential use shall include consideration of relevant matters, such as the suitability of the location, the environment, and the legal and physical attributes of the property for such use, the estimated cost, if any, of converting the property to such use, and the supply, sale price levels, and relative desirability of other properties that would compete for the same kind of use. Because the APPRAISER'S finding as to the highest and best use is a conclusion that the property does not have a higher present value for any other use, the analysis of the property for the process of appraising the property and, therefore, may be included in the valuation analysis furnished in accordance with Paragraph 10 hereof. 10. Property Valuation and Appraisal Analysis. The opinion of the APPRAISER as the fair market value of the property. The appraisal report shall contain a description of the reasoning process used by the APPRAISER in reaching his conclusion as to value and all data and analyses needed to explain and support his valuation. The supporting data and analyses furnished in the appraisal report shall include, among other things, the following: a. An analysis of the property, as identified and described in accordance with the preceding paragraphs of this SECTION, from the point of view of evaluating the effect of its characteristics and attributes on its value for the available use or uses for which the property is best suited. Particular attention shall be given to the characteristics of the property most relevant to its value, such as, in the case of an investment property, the income potential and the expense of ownership, maintenance, and operation. b. Evaluation of information with respect to previous sales of the property appraised and any recent offers of the owner to sell the property. c. The data and the analyses that constitute the principle basis for the APPRAISER'S opinion of the fair market value. Information shall be furnished with respect to recent sales of other properties which are considered by the APPRAISER to be comparable with, and the provide useful evidence of the value of, the property appraised. The information furnished with respect to each such comparable property and its sale shall include, among other pertinent facts, the names of the grantor and grantee, the date of the sale, the sale price, any special terms or conditions or circumstances of the sale that affected the transaction, and a description of the property and its condition at the time of sale in sufficient detail for use in comparing it with the property appraised. The appraisal report shall contain the APPRAISER'S analysis of each comparable property and its sale in relation to the property appraised. The APPRAISER'S analysis in each case shall reflect consideration of, and appropriate allowances for, the difference in the time of the sale and the date of appraisal and the differences in the utility, desirability, and productivity of the properties that are pertinent to their relative value. The appraisal report shall contain a valuation data map showing the location of the property appraised and the comparable properties referred to in the appraisal report. d. All other information, analysis, and the estimates considered by the APPRAISER to be relevant to the estimation of the fair market value of the property. e. If the property appraised is part of a larger parcel in the same owenrship or is less than the entire interest of the owner in the property, the appraisal report shall contain the APPRAISER'S opinion of just compensation for a taking of such property or interest, using the before-and-after method of valuation as interpreted under State law unless it is obvious that there would be no damages or benefits to the remaining property or interest of the owner. However, if the part or interest to be taken is such a small part of the whole property that the damages for the taking can be more accurately estimated directly, that method may be used if permitted under State law, without estimating the fair market value of the entire property of the owner. The foregoing opinions of the APPRAISER shall be supported in his report by the data and analysis -7- 094 by which he reached his conclusions. The appraisal report shall also contain, for information purposes only (unless required by State Law), the APPRAISER'S estimates of the fair market value of the to -be-acquired part or interest as part of the whole property and the net damages or benefits to the remaining property of the owner. If, in the opinion of the APPRAISER, acquisition of the part of, or interest in, the property proposed for acquisition would leave the owner with an uneconomic remnant, the APPRAISER shall furnish a separate estimate of the fair market value of the entire property and interests of the owner unless informed by the COUNTY that it does not have authority legally to acquire the remnant. A remainder parcel or interest shall be considered to be an uneconomic remnant if by itself it is not capable of being used economically. f. Such maps, plans, photographs, or other exhibits, as necessary, to explain or illustrate the analyses of the APPRAISER. g. The APPRAISER'S evaluation of the indications of value deduced from his separate analyses of the various evidences of value and an explanation of how he reached his final conclusion as to the fair market value of the property. 11. Land Value. The opinion of the APPRAISER as to the fair market value of the land, if vacant. The valuation shall be for the same interest in the land as is to be acquired in the real property. The report shall contain information with respect to the available use or uses for which the land would be suitable if vacant, the opinion of the APPRAISER as to its highest and best use, and the APPRAISER'S analysis of the evidences of value and of the use potential by which he reached his conclusions as to the highest and best use and the land value. 12. Additional Findings in Certain Cases. Additional conclusions, if applicable, as follows: a. Parcels Comprised of Independently Marketable Properties. If the parcel is marketable as two or more separate properties, the appraisal report shall, in addition to furnishing the APPRAISER'S opinion of the fair market value of the entire parcel, identify each separately marketable property by street address and the actual or an assumed suitable legal description and provide a separate estimate of the fair market value of each such separately marketable property as an independent property. The appraisal report on the entire parcel in such a case may be presented as separate reports, one for each separately marketable property, with an overall report on all such properties considered as a single property. Any difference between the sum of the APPRAISER'S opinions of the fair market value of the separately marketable properties and his opinion of the fair market value of the entire parcel shall be explained. b. Separately Held Interests. If there are separately held interests in the real property to be acquired, such as easements, leaseholds, air rights, life estates, and oil, gas, or mineral rights, and the division of ownership is not of such character as to destroy the practical unity of the property, the APPRAISER shall apportion his estimate of the fair market value of the property (all interests therein to be acquired) to each separately held interest. If a tenant owns any real property improvements which he has the right or obligation to remove at the expiration of his term, the apportionment between the landlord and the tenant shall be made in accordance with Paragraph c below. The report shall contain the data, analyses, and reasoning by which the APPRAISER made the apportionment. If the "unit rule" is regarded as not applicable because the division of ownership is such as to diminish the fair market value of the property as a whole, the separate interests involved shall be appraised separately. c. Tenant-Owned Improvements. If any buildings, structures, fixtures, or other improvements, comprising part of the property appraised are identified, as provided in Paragraph 5 of this agreement, as being the property of a tenant who has the right or obligation to remove them at the expiration of his term, the APPRAISER shall apportion his estimate of the fair market value of the real property appraised, including the property of each such tenant, to the landowner and the tenant or tenants -8- 09c so that the amount apportioned to each tenant for his interest in the real property will be the greatest of (1) the fair market value of the tenant's leasehold interest in the property, (2) the amount which the tenant's property contributes to the fair market value of the property as a whole, or (3) the fair market value of the tenant's improvements for removal from the property. The appraisal report shall state the basis for the valuation of each tenant's interest and furnish the date and analyses on which such valuation was made. d. Owner-Occupant in a Multi-family or Mixed Use Property. If the property is a multi-family or mixed-use (residential and non-residential) property and the owner of a compensable interest therein, as defined in the next sentence, occupies a dwelling in the property, the APPRAISER shall furnish an apportionment of his estimate of the fair market value of the whole property to such dwelling or to each such owner occupied dwelling if more than one, and to the remainder of the property. For the purpose of this paragraph, an occupant of a dwelling shall be considered to own a compensable interest in the property if he holds fee title, a life estate, a 99-year lease, or a lease with not less than 50 years to run from the date of valuation, or holds an interest in a cooperative housing project which includes the right of occupancy of a dwelling unit therein, or is the contract purchaser of any of the foregoing estates or interests, or has a leasehold interest with option to purchase. The APPRAISER'S report shall explain how he made the apportionment and the rationale therefore. 13. Machinery, Equipment and/or Fixtures. If machinery, equipment and/or fixtures used in a trade, business, farm operation, institutional or governmental function constitute part of the real property, the appraisal report shall contain a separate schedule which provides separate estimates for each such item, as prescribed below. If there is more than one owner of such items, a separate schedule shall be furnished for each owner. The information and conclusions to be furnished on each item are as follows: (1) Description of the item, including, as appropriate, the manufacturer, model and serial number, size or capacity, age and condition, and degree of obsolescence. Accessories and spare parts, special foundations, and power wiring and process piping generally shall be listed separately, following the listing of the item(s) to which they apply. (2) Estimate of the replacement cost installed of the item as listed and identified (excluding any elements listed separately). Separately identify the basis of estimated replacement cost (new or used). (3) The contributive (enhancement) value of the item to the fair market value of the real property as a whole. (4) Estimated fair market value of the item for removal from the property at a purchaser's expense. Such value shall be considered to be the probable selling price if the item were offered for sale for removal from the property at the purchaser's expense, allowing a reasonable time to find a purchaser buying with knowledge of the uses and purposes for which it is adaptable and capable of being used, including salvage for serviceable components and scrap when it appears that will provide the highest value. The schedule(s) of estimates shall be consistent, with the property analysis approved by the COUNTY, as provided. The APPRAISER is permitted to use the services of such technical specialists as may be needed to enable the APPRAISER to provide valid estimates and sound valuations. The schedule(s) shall be supported by an explanation of the procedures followed in gathering the necessary market information and technical data. The principle purpose of the APPRAISER'S accompanying narrative, however, must be to explain his analyses and his evaluations of the dollar amount of the overall contribution of the machinery, equipment, and fixtures to the fair market value of the real property as a whole. The report shall contain any layout plans, sketches, or photographs that are restrictions, mineral rights, leases, and any known, but unrecorded, interests of other parties. Sufficient information shall be furnished to disclose the probable effect of such outstanding interests on the title of the record owner. -9- 09t (5) Outstanding special assessments, if any, for public improvements such as streets, sidewalks, public utilities, and similar public facilities; (6) The amount of real estate taxes for the current year and the assessed valuation stated separately for land and for improvements. SECTION V TIME OF PERFORMANCE The preparation and delivery of the required appraisal reports by the APPRAISER, as outlined in the applicable sections of this agreement, shall be completed within thirty (3o)calendar days after the APPRAISER has received a Notice to Proceed issued by the COUNTY. It is understood by the parties to this agreement that the time within which the work is to be performed is of primary importance and of the essence of this agreement. The APPRAISER will proceed with the work outlined herein in such sequence and order as to the different parcels as the COUNTY may, in writing, direct, and will furnish and deliver the appraisal reviews and price recommendations to the COUNTY as soon as completed. In the event unforeseen delays, or additional requests for work, cause this performance deadline to be exceeded the COUNTY and the APPRAISER shall establish a mutually agreeable written extension which shall be negotiated and incorporated as an addendum to this agreement. SECTION VI MAXIMUM COMPENSATION PAYABLE The COUNTY shall compensate the APPRAISER for the services rendered under this agreement on the following basis: - 1. For the basic services described in SECTION III, exclusive of those services rendered in accordance with any other sections of this agreement, the APPRAISER shall receive total maximum compensation not to exceed $5,000.00 In the event unforeseen circumstances result in the COUNTY desiring additional services whose cost is in excess of the total maximum compensation payable hereabove, a mutually agreeable written addendum to increase the maximum compensation payable shall be negotiated and incorporated into this agreement. 2. The specific fees to be charged by the APPRAISER and paid by the COUNTY shall be in accordance with Exhibit B - Fee Schedule, which is attached to this agreement. 3. For additional services to be rendered by the APPRAISER for supplementary parcels added to this agreement, in the same manner as described previously, the APPRAISER shall receive additional compensation at the rates shown on Exhibit B attached to this agreement. Such services shall be submitted to the COUNTY within the same timeframe as outlined previously in SECTION V. 4. For services as an expert witness for the COUNTY in judicial proceedings, including formal pre-trial conferences, as provided with respect to any property appraised by the APPRAISER pursuant to this agreement, the APPRAISER and the COUNTY hereby agree that the fair and reasonable compensation for the APPRAISER'S services. shall be at the rate of$100.00 per day for each day of court testimony and/or pre-trial conference. In the event such attendance shall be for one-half day or less, compensation shall be made on the basis of for such half-day. The payments outlined above shall be made to the APPRAISER by the COUNTY subject to completion of the required service appropriate recognition by the court of the APPRAISER as an expert witness and the receipt of an appropriate requisition. -10- 09'1 BY: (Appraiser) (Street Address) (City) (State) (Zip Code) (Agency ATTEST: COUNTY OE ORANGE, NORTH CAROLINA BY: II 096 Exhibit B - FEE SCHEDULE II to AGREEMENT FOR APPRAISAL SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACQUISITION OF LAND between COUNTY OF ORANGE, NORTH CAROLINA and KATHLEEN K. BUCK, APPRAISER ROUTE 5, BOX 90 CHAPEL HILL, N.C. The following fees shall be used in calculating the compensation to be paid to the APPRAISER by the COUNTY in fulfilling the obligations under this agreement; $150.00 Per Parcel ORANGE COUNTY • • r BOARD. OF COMMISSIONERS • ACTION AGENDA, ACTION AGENDA ITEM. ABSTRACT ITEM N0_ ( MEETING DATE October 6 , 1986 SUBJECT: Proposed Budget Amendments DEPARTMENT: Finance PUBLIC HEARING: YES X I10 ATTACHMENT(S): Ih1FORMAT•ION• CONTACT: Donna Wagner Proposed Budget Amendments - PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH - 732_-8181 HIIJ_SBOROUGH -- 732-9361 . • - CHAPEL HILL - 967•-9251 i'MEBANE -- 12.7--2.031 • DURHAM M 6f,&-7331 PURPOSE: Consideration of proposed budget amendments . - NEED: . GENERAL FUND - 1. To budget for •-CAT Transportation contract between OPC Mental Health and Orange County -Department on Aging. - 2 . To budget for State Discretionary Funds received by the Orange ' County Department on Aging .- - - - 3. To accept funds from the Governor ' s Waste Management Board for • . provision of t.echnica,l or professional services to the Orange County "Health Department . _ • 4 . To budget for funds for the Emergency Food and Shelter program for th.e Department of Sooial Services . - IMPACT: GENERAL FUND • 1. This amendment will require to County fields since •the leasing fees portion of th,e •CAT program will be self-supporting . 2 . This amendment will increase funds available to the Orange County Department on Aging with 100% State funds ; no County - match is , required. : 3. This amendment will increase funds available to the_ Orange County Health Department with 1002 State funds;- ho County match is required . 4 . This amendment will increase funds available for general assistance with_ 100% State funds , no County match is required . CECO •i1:_I;DA(IO.'r(S) : Approve motion to amend the 1986-87 Budget Ordinance - by proposed amendments , M 10C ORANGE COUNTY PROPOSED 1986-87 BUDGET AMENDMENT The 1986-87 Budget Ordinance as adopted on July 23, 1986 , and subsequently amended, is hereby amended as follows : BEFORE AFTER AMENDMENT AMENDMENT AMENDMENT GENERAL FUND 1 . Appropriation: Aging $ 270 , 577 $20, 680 $ 291, 257 Source CAT Transportation - Lease Fees 3 ,171 20 , 680 23,851 To budget for OPC Mental Health contract for CAT leasing . 2 . Appropriation: Aging $ 291 , 257 $ 5 , 500 $ 296 , 757 Source: State Discretionary Funds 0 5 , 500 5 ,500 To budget for State Discretionary Funds to be received . 3 . Appropriation: Health $1 ,569 ,576 $ 5, 000 $1, 574,576 Source : Governor ' s Waste Management 0 5 , 000 5 , 000 To budget for Governor' s Waste Management funds to be received . 4. Appropriations : Social Services $3 , 125 , 733 $ 5 , 098 $3 , 130 , 831 Source: Emergency Food . and Shelter 0 5 , 098 $ 5 ;098 To budget for Emergency Food and Shelter funds to be received . 1.01 O R A N G E C O U N T Y BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date October 6_2._.1986 Action enda item #� _ SUBJECT: SUNSET RIDGE - PRELIMINARY DEPARTMENT: PLANNING - PUBLIC HEARING Yes _ X _ No Attachment(s) information Contact: Eddie Kirk Checklist Vicinity Map Preliminary Plan Certification Agency Letters Preliminary Plan Draft PB■ 9-15-86 Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 PURPOSE: To consider approval of the Preliminary Plan for Sunset Ridge subdivision . NEED: The property in question is located in Cheeks Township along the south side of West Lebanon Road (SR 1306) between Mill Creek Road and Doe Run Road . It is referenced as lot 29 on Tax Map 6. The subdivision will be served by Sundown Drive, a proposed public road to be constructed to state standards. The tract is bordered by undeveloped 'and residential land . There are 14 lots proposed out of 14.76 acres with an average • lot size of .96 acres excluding right-of-way. The property is zoned Rural Residential (R-1 ) and is designated Rural Residential in the Land Use Plan. IMPACT: A 1985 traffic count on SR 1306 (West Lebanon Road) indicated 700 trips per day just west of SR 1342 (Frazier Road) . An additional 140 trips per day would be generated by this sub- division . There are no streams located on the property. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan subject to the lot lines being shifted to obtain the minimum road frontage required for lot 13. The Planning Board recommended approval subject to the Plan- ning Staff recommendation and the condition that all lots get access from Sundown Drive. 11134 • APPLICATION FOR_Sl•?SOIVtum APPROVA! 1 ) - GRANGE CDON-r DATE: - Jay 21,1986 SUBDISION NAME: Sunset Ridge VI • LOCATION: South of the Intersection of =x;11 Creek and Lebamn Church R3. (S.R. 1306) • - Je Ra Fre ]and O NEN/DEVELOPER: - ADDAESS: Rt.3 Box 345 Hillsboroug TELEPHONE NO.: 1'--- T. AGENT/CONTACT - T,i sa Pakenham . TELEPHONE Na. : 732 6101 - - A. SUMMARY INFORMATION: -F - Granga County Tax Map _ 6 Black Letts) 29— Township- Cheeks Zoning Districttsl : Rive, Residential TataL Number' of Acres: Aporox_ 14.41 Phases: 1 -. Tata L Number- of Lots: 13 Average Lot Size:. Minimum L.ot Size -92 Number/Typo of Structures.: iexisting) _ none Ip-reposed)_ none Lineal. Feet in S eats: 11'19 ag Acres in Open Space rox. 4,44 acres Water SuppLy:, Pub Lic(speci fy) Community x individue I Wastewater Disposal: ma c • Pub Li a(speciify) Comiiunity x IndIvidueI School 0istriet: e L°unLY Fire District: 1:;s'rarxi General Land Uses in• Area: Residential and Faxining Critical Areaar stream/dreinagewaya flood prone areas waters had(spec.ify) - _ o&isto ; sites ethsrtexpLain) - H. ALL p Lata must be submitted on sheet no sma L Ler than one inch aqua is taro hundred feet (111=200' I and. no Larger than one inch equa Ls fifty fee (4 "=S0' ) and. must contain the foLLarring _information : subdivision name •: bUiLding we ecb lines - name of ownar(sl �� '" ,�_� by nAtaticsr ar typical iaa c name- of nurse Y,•�• = !. i tem5 -�+ ;.-.�« ybr� engineer ar ,.:+::: Layaut- : land planner �::* saluting mad proposed eass� 7.platMd) `� ititia] Preliminary Ptan -',:. mangy tdrn:nage, scititias anal., north arros (North at k% roads, stn_! a , ' tap of asp) ••-'. axisaing� proposed sad j _ `,"_ dace (inoLuding revision dates] .- , sdjolaing rights-of-way township, tax map-block-tot -* including dimensions and. - rrtarsnces street manes and state road boundary deaaribed witq numbers e. bearings end diatenees ✓' '•-f existing and proposed - ..1G tote! acreage of the tract $=: .r- etitities, inctuding - ' r and earwig* of total, including • .-: type, size., end excluding arwn within r hydrants, waives and - ✓ rights.-ofmeay manhole• . emntrot oorner saluting• and proposed culvert ` '•`.- propeaed tot lines with it-<:i including sixse and grsdas r dimension* _L4 �'�'•� eypicaL ssr:et cress-sea;ions - lot aumbrrs - N:� and intersection details - _1G- .1 phasing tinea ""' including design snd width . - tapogrephy at tan foot (101 ,:;".:'' of trswstwoy and thoutdars '' intervals V horizontal alignsant :ad . seter bodi■e, stream*, flood san•raI curve data [ ubtic ' <' p _ wey and rloodplains x;,•::."• roads) '� =� striae tr*ttart snd notation pereanea tratarww such e* ,.� indicating restricted �:%�,, buildings, ermwzareys, n dwelupsrna potential ac;:#:' hiezorto landaerks, tamwsbip, eorporwse mad sutra^ . `• adjoining ;at tsy6eC. : ;:r territorial planning names` et edjoinlrg• p'repertr jurisdiction lines which owners and $vbdIvleions - tress the property Location and sits of paraela dadicatad for pablie osa er reesrrad W,-.x• in common F� ...L Lotstlon and size of lota of restricted development pore: iii nett ✓ nenatlon on plat regarding ease ,-_ sternum:sr management plan lndicettng provision. tar corn-rat- ox thaw first 1/2 inch of runoff from impervious surfaces :' OTHER SUBMITTAL REaUZREIENTS: 10t!... . 1 . Twenty—six (2S) copies of the preLiminary plat - - 2. Two fu L L size copies of an Orange County Tax map (one copy with parceLs involved cLearLy marked) . 3. Where municipal, or OWASA sewer is not avai Labta , a Letter free* the Ore County HeaLth Department certifying: the proposed wastewater system - each Lot. _ - - _ - - , the app Li cant, hereby certify that the foregoing app Li cation► is complete iccurata. I understand that a 3210.00 fee (subdivisions of 15 Lots or Le it a 3370.00 fee (subdivisions of IS Lots or morel is due at the -vise 3ppLication. A $5.00 per Lot fee is due at the time the fleet plat 3 resented for recordation . 110.. - • . ; . . . , kPP ''CANT S Si/6 USE • �;NEii 'S, 5IGNAT ]ATE / _ DATE . _ • FEES: Amount ,f fd, d •Date Paid 7-2 7 -N.: - - 1.62AG // ti ion ii a 0 //� � , ,- !., 0 4?o // !1 `, - -6.980 2 E- 0 21.1 AC. y. 33 AC. ! ' • le../ 8711 `� t829 '. ,i,QZ�►C- t 6739 �/ ` Ir �� $ i ! / 1.45 AC. tw 1- _ us HQ , _ � _ its� • 6 92 14.821 ` \ - - 0 / / - .48C►C- ` Z3g� j s €9 i ‘ 10- 80S r 8140 i . A ....... • 3866 9&O 5-__. ��� // 1 AC. arr. 94'gg ROAD �, 1 .18 AC. W ,88= �e yr' 6i *cm_7902 ,1 ACS a i, _�_. I2 5 s• • a. 70 S _� - r 300 ?823 1 _ e - - . :. 1 •1 : , 7409 -. . • oat7. - 945f t.t , 36 AC. I 0 t 3.6.2 AC. 5` QC tt - i - -. / 1 • ) S. 1 %JAos J 1 25 _. �- 1459~ . - 1' 46.59 AC t f SUNSET RIDGE ? - 1 I . Applicant: Lisa Pakenham N -- - rr ? Zoning: R-- 1 - - LUP Designation: Rural Residential . Scale:: l" = 400' 4 - 0. 0 -- _ - v ' • LEGEND . • - . . - _, - _ it-------L---•77 ECOE. Cr ittaCany — ——. — .....DEEP tar muse* • SUNSET RIDGE • • . - • - ORA1 GE CQII`t CERTIFICATION AND APPROVALS PRELI:•'.INARY_ PL STAFF ASSIGNMENT:. Eddie Kirk . SKETCH PLAN: Received 6-4-86 _ Ravi eared PRELIMINARY PLAT:PLAT: Received 7-23-$6 Ravi erred 7-30`86 REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT: Received Reviewed NCDOT: DATE 7-29-$6 CERTIFICATION J. H- Mills - - SCHOOL BOARD (Orange/Chapel. Hi LL-Carrboro) : DATE -8f Certification, UTLITIES (OL",ASA/Hi L Lsbo rough/Mebane/Orange A Lamance/:iu r•ham) : DATE 9-5.86 Certification Rar _y, OTHER: Recreation Advisory Counci L -5-86 EDate) _ Carrbora Fire Department (Date). . Chapel Hi 1 L t (Date) _ Carrboro (betel Hi LLsborough .(Da$e] Durham (Date/ - - - Other - Erosion Control 8.5-86 (Date) (Date/ PLANNING BOARD : Data 9-15-86 Approva Approval. with Conditions X Denial. i - BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS : Date ApprovaL Approval wi th Conditions Denial - • • • • • . •' IFI'7:11N • Q • STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA _ • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - . Graham, NC 27253-0766 - - - - - JAMES G.MARTIN _ - - GOVERNOR July 29, 1986 _ T JAMES E HARRINGTON - - SECRETARY - Orange County, - • - - - - - . - Mr. Marvin. Collins ' • -- = - - - - . • Orange County Planning Department - - _ . - • 106 East Margaret Lane - _ _ ." • Hillsborough, NC 27278 Subject: Sunset Ridge Subdivision Off - - - - • • • SR 1306, Lebanon Road - Dear Mr. Collins: • - - - _ • . This is to advise that we are giving approval for the - preliminary plait for the above subdivision. Pival approval will • be -pending approval of the construction plan. - If there are any questions, please advise.. - - • • - -Yours very truly, . , _///2 _ - C".-7-1F--) 2.• M. lfills STRICT _ JM I/JSH:jb$ - -•• ..'cc: . Lisa Pakenhaa _ _ - - An Equal Opportunity/AlrumativeActioasEmpiasy _ - ORANGE coy. PLANNING DEPARTMENT B1LLSBOROUG$ . - NOR= CAROLINA 27278 - ].Q I _ - . � MEMORANDUM - - - _ . . - . - - •. . TO: Eddie Kirk, Planner - - - • FROM: Warren Faircioth, Erosion Control Officer _ -__ SUBJECT: Sunset Ridge Stormwater Management -Plan DATE: August 5, . 1985 - .-- - - • This plan proposes to use two detention ponds to store- r urn, f f_ from-.the development and release it slowly to approximate the _ • predevelopment runoff characteristics. i have reviewed the . plans for • this • subdivision- and find that It meets - the - . - Ordinance requirements. - _- - - - -- _ -- -. . .: ILY:k!vilikvh&- . . -._ _ . .. . - _ Warren Faircloth • - - 7 rangz Ca' --:tJ " .0""‘.19c 3O9 West Trion S:ree! - lam s ,; 1 }r4' HILLSBOROUGH, V.C. 27278 - - �T 11r A . . el3j. : • :K. Director - t1Et10�9 `, - • 'TO: : Eddie Kirk, Planner • - - - - FROM: Mary Anne Black L7 _ _ __ • DATE: August 5, 1986 • - - _ - RE: Courtesy Review • Moreland Subdivi DRAFT PBM 9-15-86 PAGE 12 Ag -emen . ioLs VOTE: 9 in f . or . DRAFT (Kra , r • t of the room) e. Sunset Ridge - Preliminary Presentation by Kirk . This agenda item is to consider approval of the Preliminary Plan for Sunset Ridge subdivision . The property in question is located in Cheeks Township along the south side of West Lebanon Road (SR 1306) between Mill Creek Road and Doe Run Road. It is referenced as Lot 29 on Tax Map 6. The subdivision will be served by Sundown Drive, a proposed public road to be constructed to state standards . The tract is bordered by undeveloped and residential land . There are 14 lots proposed out of 14.76 acres with an average lot size of .96 acres excluding rights- of-way. The property is zoned rural Residential (R- 1 ) and is designated Rural Residential in the Land Use Plan . A 1985 traffic count on SR 1306 (West Lebanon Road) indicated 700 trips per day just west of SR 1342 (Frazier Road) . An additional 140 trips per day would be generated by this subdivision. There are no streams located on the property. The Planning Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan subject to the lot lines being shifted to obtain the minimum road frontage required for Lot #3. Shanklin inquired the minimum frontage for lot 13. Kirk responded that an R-1 designation requires that frontage along the road itself be 80% of the . required width for the lot which Is 1301 at the 401 building setback line. Walters asked about access to the property behind this subdivision . Kirk responded that when the right--of-way was dedicated the property behind would have access through the proposed road. Shanklin noted that Lake Michael was south of this property . Kirk stated that the lake was approxi- DRAFT PBM 9-15-86 PAGE 13 in mately 1400 ' south of the property. Lisa Packenham of Ailenton Realty, representing the developer, stated that the developer has an option on the property behind this subdivision; thus, there will probably be a second phase to this subdivision. She continued that the Town of Mebane owns the property bordering the lake. Walters inquired if there would be mobile homes or houses in the subdivision . Ms. Packenham responded there are restrictive covenants which allow only for double-wides after 1983 with a permanent foundation or a stick-built house of at 1000, square feet. Shanklin expressed concern with the traffic on Mill Creek Road turning onto West Lebanon Road. He felt this would create a problem with the. driveway on Lot #2. Kizer stated that he felt Lots I 1 and 9 should exit onto Sundown Drive. Walters noted that Lot 12. should also exit onto Sundown Drive.. MOTION: Best moved approval with Staff recommendation and that all lots exit onto Sundown Drive. Seconded by Kizer. VOTE: Unanimous. f . Anthony Ri ards - F4el urinary DRAFT 2)4 NPresentat i on by K yrk .` Tl'ts agenda item is to cons\kder rpproval of the Preli,minary PI il for the property of Annie Belle Richards surve d for Anthony R ch rds_. The property/ in question is Ppcated in Cheeks Township on/the a st side of Fraz er ,Road (SR 1310) . it is referenced as part of Lot 7B of Tax Map 12. The tract is border d by residen lai development and undeveloped wooded I nd . An Orange Countt, "Ciass C" private road (Anthony Court) will provide access to the prqposed lot. \ r There, is one ( 1 ) lot p oposed' out of 15 .4601 acres with 'a lot size of 1 .229 acr s . The zoning of the property 'is Rural Resident al R-1 ) with an overlay zoning designation of Upper E o Protected Watershed (PW- I1 ) . The Land Use Pisa designation is Rural Residential and Upper Eno \ ter Supply Watershed. Th/e R-1 , PW- I ) zoning strict classification F v/ O R A N G E C O U N T Y BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date October 62_19$6. Actionda item # SUBJECT: PROPERTY SURVEYED FOR ANTHONY RICHARDS - PRELIMINARY PLAN DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes X No Attachment( s) Information Contact: Jane Garrett Application Vicinity Map Preliminary Plan Agency Comments Preliminary Plat Certification Draft PPM 9-15-86 Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham -- 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill -- 968-4501 PURPOSE : To consider approval of the Preliminary Plan for the property of Annie Belle Richards. To receive the Planning Board 's recommendation . NEED: The property in question is located in- Cheeks Township on the east side of Frazier Road (SR 1310) . It is referenced as part of Lot 7B of Tax Map 12. The tract is bordered by residential development and undeveloped wooded land . An Orange County "Class C" private road (Anthony Court) will provide access to the proposed lot. There is one ( 1 ) lot proposed out of 15 .4601 acres with a lot size of 1 .229 acres. The zoning of the property is Rural Residential (R-1 ) with an overlay zoning designation of Upper Eno Protected Watershed (PW--II ) . The Land Use Plan designation is Rural Residential and Upper Eno Water Supply Watershed . The R-1 , PW--II zoning district classification requires a minimum lot size of 40,000 square feet or 0.92 acres. The Health Department has granted approval of the proposed tot. Police protection would be provided by the Orange County Sher iff 's Department, while fire protection would be provided by the Efland Rural Fire District. IMPACT: There is no traffic count available for Frazier Road. However, an additional 9.5 trips per day would be generated by the subdivision . 11k. RECOMMENDATION: The. Planning Board recommended approval of the Preliminary Plan on September 15, 1986. WJ • APPLICATION FOR SUBQ LION• APPR PIA( ORANGE COI1NT1 . • racy-& DATE: 25- (� SUBDIVISION NAME: , PrG-Ter SU Q r NN114101-1 ! .:cbe rA s 6 LOCATION: Or\e e g e‘osi- $\-i) OWNER/DEVELOPER:.Pt '1 w 4l■c\ncyr C\5• ADDRESS: •. L TELEPHONE ND. : sl 3 Ce-1aa'nr __C , -an -o� - AGENT/CDNTACT:. -1Wrnin ::7r»-e t�c'k or TELEPHONE NC. L. rd�,l .- a, A-r-"It...rit 4�;r�o.re� r,10r\tIr' . ti(-3 - 4 � . r A. SUMMARY INFORMATION: ` Orange County Tax Map , 1 -a Black Lot(saA 4`1f)Townshig Zoning District(s): 41 --1 Total Number of Acres: 1h.4001, Phases: I Tota L Number of Lots:. , I Average Lot Size 1jj Minimum Lot Size. Number/Type- of Structures : (exi ting) .(proposedl V.-a or% 10 LineaL Feet in Streets: V1 ? , Acres in Open Space Water SuppLy:_,,,.c E!\\ Pub Lic(speci fy) ,rCammunity.•t• Individua L • Wastewater- Disposal: PulaLic(apecifyl __Community ,,,, Ind vi duet. Schoo L District: _{ nc n 1 r District.: \ar.k� - Genera L•. Land Uses in Ar�a:�� ' e ;de ' Critical Areas: stream/drainageways flood prone areas .watershed(speciA - ____historic sites otheriexptainl (.tp "r B. ALL p Lats must be submitted on sheet Inc smatter than one inch squats two hundred feet (7 p=2G0 i ) and. no Larger than one inch squats fifty fee £U'=50' ) and must contain the foLLowing information: .�.& subdivision nose -Iir":'_: but tdlogloortbaqk s��' memo of nwnwrl.) �j'e3etheCSt�Mies Neck Items . ease at surveyor, engineer er Ls outsion* wr typiceL Rat Lend tanner existing and �-•� 9 proposed tees :Ompleted) � • .� ttitLs) Preliminary plan r ;a" sours (groins '�° sisals, north arrow (North at 9 . utilities, ML top of mop) cords, arc_? • ✓ .:.o existing, proposed and .4, dots (lnatuding revision dotes) ••- -. adjoining rights-of-way -4.. ' • township, tan map-block-tot : lootadinyl dimensions and_ .r/ rsfsremose street amuse end state road ..� boundary described with auebere bear•sge and distanems r • . •• existing and proposed . total acreage of the tract including r sod acreage of Lots, including tt 1, sizes, • and exaLuding area within g hydra ts,. s, } rights-of-,sy •'' ` manholes„ serves and control teener - 'x ' manholes .� � existing end proposed culvert .dL proposed lot tins. with 9 .inatudiag sizzle and grades dimensions ✓:::•:r'.r typical etre.t cra•s-sections • - lot number, end intersection details Y.' phasing tines .x•"'•V topography at tan foot (103 i- if (rave design end width t of trovet.►y and Choutd.rs • f- interv.ls - $'u .stow bodies, { horizontal e llgnarent sad , , flood- ;w,: general carve data tpubUtc ✓ w.y end fLaodpleins ":•-• roads) ln1 buffer, and notation f•! permanent features such as Indicating ressrictad I buildings, cemeteries dsvetopnwnt potential W." • township, ; *torts landmarks, p, :separate and extra- l" $ adjoining lot territorial planning layout s V. jurisdiction tires which o f adjeiaing property Owners subdivision's JG/ , crown the property•.-1 Location snd size of parents dedicated for public U.S or reserved /d in common v location and size .of lots of restricted development; potential. sod . notation on pt.t regarding same storars:at .anagewent plan Indicating prowisios for cosrrrat at'the first 1/2 Inch of runoff ?row impervious our-tacos • (GRAY AREAS FOIL OFFI CE LJ.aG ONLY .114 • C. OTHER SUBMITTAL REaUIREJIENTS: • 1 . Twenty—six (2S) copies of the preliminary plat 2. Two full size capias of an Orange County Tax map Lone copy with parcels involved clearly marked) . ' 3. Where municipal or OWASA sewer is not available. a tatter frog, the Ore County Health Department certifying •the proposed wastewater system, each lot. I, the applicant* hereby certify that the foregoing app Li catloe t5 cowp terte accurate. I understand that a 3210.00 fee (subdivisions- of 15 Lots or Le or a $370.00 fee (subdivisions of 16 Lots or morel is due at. the times ties application . A $5.00 per Lot fee is duo at the time the figs,. plat presented for recordation. Ont)TrtLj [l1C`(`^` toi thAI APPLICA 'I t S SIGNATURE OWNER'S GNATLURE: 0_5 -- 7 -- - QATE • DATE • • • • • • • • • FEES: Amount °NV' Date Paid 7-25-3& Receipt M)b • • . . _g 88 _ 7 . . . q . 11 • —� — - � 5�2. SEE 7-5 _� _ f o 116f LAB .� f� . i . g 2 -. � /' 5223 a . t 7A TM . •• 1 ! 'off 8242 ;n 0256 tad 3� 1, ; • Y - 1 ,- 6 ItSZ \ - ..•" - 0 _ •I i a ,3 •6955 � S - -.. - _ 0 .. ,•. r 5935 1.95 -. ; a ii, . . . , ., . .. . • ..r - 8 ' g82 - •• • i . • „Ac..... A. . / r° 3. . ? 7C Cw 2.E 8 ,_ . • . , . .. .,. :b• • • . co , -t 0 / WEGG ''' --� S ` . 30.7 AC.- - - w / / .8258 �1 •`' 3285 -. a _ . 1 e 1686AG '"4-60 2 • . o' •••_ :r 7B a _ AC .. _:_z .` -. 7724. _ 15.4601 AC- - 5$a`r - _ - _. 1 ` 420 x - - _ - - • 1. 1+- 9457 •s 1,5099X- - _ I ) '4A i.G�;AG 8'; fr. .-e w 123.44 - t - _ t. 0 Q2433 .f�. 87 . - sa a69 + 265 AC. 9; - _ _ _ - 2;0 • ti .4127 +° - _ __ 1AC 'ICBM. F - 2.28 �► AC. t ,. _ - Arsnno 9 R. +� " APP K 1ca�ta� 1� 5s85 larANT= At: b R1e11A� hA.:' AC: x..13051' : :" j 45T 8WIJ�CR W4"1- t651DW►g111- 1Di►► t' P�D� - - 2ANialG. Q-1 �R.�gpQE�k.k� >JIfA�'�S�� r -, _.5465857 r�a� LttP DF-` t:WArD)1= Ru>ZAL 1 ,9 °z If l I w M1 � j WALE [•' 6.3 AC. I I - ' 3.97AC. •. ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPA.RTMENT HILLSBOROUGH 1 i t . NORTH CAROLINA 27278 w e �•_ iii. - - ,`* T * _ ais a‘" MEMORANDUM TO: Jane A. Garrett, Planner FROM: Warren Faireloth, Erosion Control Officer SUBJECT: Stormwater Management Plan for Anthony Richards . Subdivision - _ DATE: August 8, 1986 • This plan proposes to meet the Ordinance requirements by the use 'of - a large lot and retaining the existing vegetation.. The plan meets the Ordinance requirements. Warren Faircloth -I 8b I _ _ _ _ _ • • • ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMEINT i 1 1r HILLSBOROUGH - NORTH CAROLINA. 27278 I': r L'-r► C i a Oes• aq S. Ate'/1 Co' August 6, 19a6 • Joe Haynes, Highway Maintenance Engineer N.C. Department of Transportation Route 3 Box 3 Hillsborough, NC 27278 Re: Property Surveyed for Anthony Richards - Dear Mr. Haynes: Enclosed is the Preliminary Plan of the abovereferenced subdivision for your - review. - The property is referenced as Tax Map 12 Part of Lot 7B in Cheeks Townships and "located on the east side of SR 1310 (Frazier Road) approximately 1550 feet south of the intersection of SR 1310 and SR 1306 (Lebanon Road). The applicant is proposing. one (1) lot to be used. for single family. An Orange County Class "C" private road will be--constructed from SR 1310 to provide access for the lot in the subdivision. Please provide � p your comments by September 2, 1986_ Lt frill be greatly appreciated. Yours(Aka truly,, - AUVUCtr... Jane A. Garrett Planner JAGjjg Dear Ms. Garrett: - This is to advise that the sight distance is adequate and Enclosure no driveway permit is required_ _ Sincerely, - D E, EIVE JoeB- Hann� ° r , D Hight, y }last -Eugi nee *11 E • ANTHONY RICHARDS 11A DRAflGE CDC;sl CERTIFICATION AND APPRCVALS - PRELI:lr;:AnY PU STAFF ASSIGNMENT:' Jane Garrett SKETCH PLAN: Received 4-11--86 Revievred 4-16-86 PRELIMINARY PLAT: Received 7-25-86 Reviewed - 8-1-86 REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT:. Received RevieDed NCDOT: DATE 8-21-86 CERTIFICATION Joe B. Haynes, ferry. Maintenance-Engineer SCHOOL BOARD (Orange/ChapeL Hi LL--Carrboro) : DATES$6 Certification ti/A UTLITIES ((WASA/Hi L Lsbo rough/Mebane/Orange A Lamance/Durhast] : DATE Certi ficatibn OTHER: Recreation Advisory Council 9-11-86 Black (Date) Verbal comment wf Carrboro Fire Department (pate] no requirements . ChapeL Hi LL (Date) Carrboro (Date) HiLLsborough (Date) Durham (Date) Other - S & E 8-14-86 Fai rcloth •(Date) Health Department 6-5.86 ; Hecht - - (Date) . - PLANNING BOARD : Date Approval. - Approval with Conditions Denial BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS : Date Approval Approval with Conditions OeaiaC • • DRAFT PBM 9-15-86 PAGE 13 m to i y 140 ' 'outh of the proper-0-y . Lis Pack%, ham of Alien•ton Realty, representing the deve`l'oper,' tated that' ,the developer has an option on the\prbpe ty behind this subdivision;, thus, there will prgbably, be a second phase to this subdivision. She continued�� that the Town ,of/Mebane , ow s the property bordering the lake. Walters i n qi�i re4 if there wou,`d be mobile homes or houses in t e s bdivision. ` Ms.\Packenham responded there are renter i t i ve covenants wh ch allow /only for double-wides aye 1983 with !a per nent f undatlon of a stick-bui f\t house of at 000 ' sq are eet. Shanklin expre;rsed sqpncern a th the tr is on Rik! Creek Road turn`jng ohto West Lebanon Ro d. He felt / this would crest+ a pretbfem w th the dri eway on Lot /2. Kizer stated that he feit" Lot . 1 1 and 9 should exit onto Sundown Drive. Waters noted that Lot #2 should also exit onto Sund n Drive. MOTION: Best moved approval with Staff re ommendation and that all Tots xit onto Sundown Drive. Seconded by Kizer. VOTE: Unanim us . DRS f . Anthony Richards - Preliminary Presentation by Kirk . ` -_ This agenda item is to consider approval of the Preliminary Plan for the property of Annie Belle Richards surveyed for Anthony Richards. The property in question is located in Cheeks Township on the east side of Frazier Road (SR 1310) . It is referenced as part of Lot 7B of Tax Map 12. The tract is bordered by residential development and undeveloped wooded land. An Orange County "Class C" private road (Anthony Court) will provide access to the proposed lot. There is one ( 1 ) lot proposed out of 15 .4601 acres with a lot size of 1 .229 acres . The zoning of the property 1s Rural Residential (R--1 ) with an overlay zoning designation of Upper Eno Protected Watershed (PW- II ) . The Land Use Plan designation is Rural Residential and Upper Eno Water Supply Watershed. The R-1 , PW- ll zoning district classification 121 DRAFT PBM 9-15-86 PAGE 14 requires a minimum lot size of 40,000 square feet or 0.92 acres . The Health Department has granted approval of the proposed lot. Police protection would be provided by the Orange County Sheriff 's Department, while fire protection would be provided by the Efiand Rural Fire District. There is no traffic count available for Frazier Road . However, an additional 9.5 trips per day i would be generated by the subdivision. The Planning Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan . Walters expressed concern that piece--meal developer is occurring on Frazier Road. Collins responded- that most applicants have no long-term plans for subdivision of the remainder of their property. This does create problems when planning future roads . MOTION: Kizer moved approval . Seconded by Waiters.. VOTE: 9 in favor (Shanklin out of the room) . fratflo- m Tan g. Gr'� Hills:ills: Section 3 - Pr/eliminary Presaptat i on y K irk / This F endar item is to consider 'approval of/ the Prel1mi yy Plan for Grampian Hills - Section/ Three SubdJ•vis ,. property of 'Mr/s. Y. Z. Cepnon. The prop Ox in question is located in Chapel Hi l l Township n the south side of B widen Road CSR 1946) . At is r fererced as Lot 24 of Tax Map ;; 117. The tract h s' direct access on Bo' den Road,. It is Iborderd by residential /developnelt. There re two (2) lots proposed out of 4.54 acres, the l c sizes are 2,25 acres ancc 2.2g acres. The zon i n of:0-..he grope y i s Rural Residential (R-1 ) ,with an overlay -..i i ng d.es ignat,i.dn of University Lake/Protected Wat r hed (PW-tl ) ./4The Land Use\ Plan designation is Rur ' i: Buffer o'nd University\Lake Wat r•.._.._ Supply Waters ed. The R-i1 , PW-i i zan ing des gnations require a minimum( lo* size of 40,000 square feet or 0.92 acres.--- - The Health Department has granted approval to both ORANGE COUNTY 121 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date October 6, 1986 Action ends Item SUBJECT: GRAMPIAN HILLS: SECTION THREE - PRELIMINARY PLAN DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes , X No Attachment(s) Information Contact: JANE GARRETT Application Vicinity Map Preliminary Plan Agency Comments Preliminary Plat Certification Draft PBM 9-15-86 - Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 967-9251 • PURPOSE: To consider approval of the Preliminary Plan for Grampian Hills - Section Three Subdivision, property of Mrs . Y. Z. Cannon. To receive the Planning Board 's recommendation. NEED: The property in question is Iotated in- Chapel Hill Township on the south side of Bowden Road (SR 1946). It is referenced as Lot 24 of Tax Map 117 . The tract has direct access. on Bowden Road . It is bordered by residential development. There are two (2) lots proposed out of 4.54 acres, the lot sizes are 2.25 acres and 2.29 acres. The zoning of the pro- perty is Rural Residential (R-1 ) with an overlay zoning desig- nation of University Lake Protected Watershed (PW--II ) . The Land Use Plan designation is Rural Buffer and University Lake Water Supply Watershed. The R-1 , PW-Il zoning designations require a minimum lot size of 40,000 square feet or 0.92 acres. The Health Department has granted approval to both tots in the subdivision . Police protection would be provided by the Orange County Sheriff 's Department, while fire protection would be provided by the White Cross Fire District. The Final Plat for Section One of Grampian Hills was approved on July 23, 1971 . There were five (5) lots proposed out of approximately 12.5 acres . The average lot size was 2.5 acres. All lots have direct access onto Jones Ferry Road (SR 1942) . The Final Plat for Section Two of Grampian Hills was approved on October 4, 1976 . There were nine (9) lots proposed out of approximately 21 .51 acres. The average lot size was 2.39 acres . Lots 1 , 2, 3,. 4, 8 and 9 have access on Leine Road and Lots 5, 6 and 7 have access on Ann Lane. Both roads were constructed to NCDOT standards for a local residential street ( 18 foot wide pavement) and dedicated for public use. IMPACT: The 1985 traffic count on Bowden Road (SR 1946) was 300 trips per day as determined from the intersection of SR 1005 . An additional 19 trips per day would be generated by the sub-- division . RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Board recommended approval of the Preliminary, Plan on September 15, 1986 contingent upon the following con- ditions: ( 1 ) Indicate the tax map and lot references on the plat; (2) The spelling of Grampian must be changed to provide con- sistency for all three sections. WJ PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT (INK ONLY) • - • 1 111113! APPt..ICATIall FOR SUBt].IVISIOn APPRpitA! - aRANG�E COP N T - DATE: n� It /tom /� - 0 -' SUBDIVISION NAME: S `'t--''•• `� 1'.`1'L -,. c LOCATION: 5 R& 19 `rC O w..1 t E4-1. A l OWNER/DEVELOPER:. Mr, ,. a, -024:11401;1 . ADDRESS:: I (.t1. . (n" 7 r i` is-/- TELEPHONE Nu..: ULM 9 7 2 ce . met.. 111 II .C. . 1 - - - AGENT/CONTACT: • • TELEPHONE NO. :. I - - - SiIMi�AnY INFORMATION:. '7,117, 2-�y Q.xP Grange County Tax. Map BLoak Lot(s] • Townshi.p • Zoning Diatri.ctta] : I I TataL Number of Acres: 4-.5.1÷ Phases Tote L Number of Lots: Average Lot Si ass ,2--Vg- _ Minimum Lot Si za z Number/Type of Structures: (existing) i (proposed] i het, _ Linea L Feet •ire Streets:. 24-7i. - . Acres in Open Space. - Water Supp Ly:IhcIrur��G4J toot S Pub Li c(speel fy] Community _ lndi vi due Wastewater Disp ass 1.:$c�nhe 7" :Pubtic(apecify) Coniaunity Individoe Schao L District: Firs District: WA' 1~s- ei it., Genera Land Uses in Area: Ysid£+.. {:, CriticaL Arses: stream/drainageways (Laud prone areas • . Ukr.0t.4.c4..t.f . watershed(apecify3 - - historic site . • . otherf expLain], . 3.. A •L p Lets must be submitted on sheet • no sme L Ler than one inch aqua is t hundred feat • (1 "=2041 ] and. no Larger- then one inch equals fifty r E1'"=5Q' ] and must contain the fo LLoring=-infarmat ion : j aabdirisle, name o ess :r147111; 2.451- L ` - neon of owner(el '":g,x by notation or typtcat tot 'ck items r Y' - nano of surveyor, engineer •r ,r� layout ��tCd :: and planner ..a - • ..,sting .std proposed eeas� - p ) A. (title) Preliminary Plan 3 wants (drainage, ati tttts*e .4 seals, north arrow (North at Y rondo,. eta.) �'°'°' top ar sapi 4' existing. proposed and _ e date (including revision detee1� adjoining rights-af-wey . _ .L :mss township, tax nap-block-oat Including dtesnalons end references struts ■sae* and state. road boundary de.arlb.d with -. • numbers - - • bearings and diat.noss :..r existing and proposed - total acreage at the tract r - •;^. utilities., including . ' ;: and scrweg• of lots, including 4r type, sixes, �•-• end uxoLnding arse within .- hydrants. valves and rights.of-eay • w.nhaLas•i• control corner �, existing and proposed csivort 1 •i•::e proposed Lot Lines with 1 including_ alzre and grades a dlnansione r..� 1 typical. merest cross-emotions - - It numbers . ::ti•T'•" and to=ara.cttan• details ` _s t,.. '1; -hosing lint. including design and width . ' topography at tan foot (101 of trans twiny end shouiders V 1 eat■ " w.t bori:natal atlgnuent and _ rotor bodies, ate...., flood- • ••Y general carts date (public ._ .': Ivey end floodplain• _ X vandal p li • ui stream buffers and notation � • rean.nt feature* snob am Indic/axing reitrlated ..� ••t3: bui Wings. aentteri.e, Y davatopsant potantl•t SEC. historic tsndoccres,. if • d township, carporsts and axtrs- +_ -'-_-3 edf,atnrirmg lot lb M : terri tor,a. planning ] r adjoining- props a� jurisdiction tines which owners and subditieions �"? • cross the property b La Lonatien and elze or parcels dedicated for public nee Or reserved vim, Lnaetion and size of iota of centrictsd dsse.ls ,/y notation on plat regarding ■•eer prrwr� petailrtis[. end G6 1114, ataremt.r aanae.sent elan 1nd4catine eeericter. fns _ • _∎ r 124 . . OTHER' SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: . 1 .. Twenty—six (28) copies of the preLiminary plat 2. Two fu L L size copies• of an Orange County Tax :map Cons copy with parceLs involved cLearty marked] . • - 3. Where municipeL or OWASA sewer is not ' avai Labtir a tatter from the Orz County HeaLth Department certifying -the • proposed wastewater syst ' each Lot. _ • • , the applicant, hereby certify that the foregoing application is compote y curets. I understand that . s $210.00 'fee (subdivisions of 15 tots op, At r a $3711.0O fee (subdivisions of 18 Lots or - morel is due et. -- the time pplicatian . A $5.00 per Lot .fee is due at the tires the ftrka[- ptal resented far recordation . _ _ Sri, ---, �.• PLICANT' •S' SIGNATURE OWNER S.LONATUBE • file_r_.12gL.ATE DATE •• • - - - . t r _ • • - a -• • . FEES: Amount (e.)--�= Date Paid iuQ 1/ fq“ Receipt- 3tf-re, v • • • • • R li-MAP I l ?4534 J I.- N.. i ,C �c t.- lej , 6 7 0159 . N / / dry 7. 0 3 C.CAL s .i.:).p:.__,-- ---"<deFr'' .-17% . //: SI'"1 .. • "N is• .0 .. . 5.21 ACT__ it'- ; %,"t / I \t•II %. ei 835- - \. / " 4 -. 4554- - _ / ■ 7 1 J _ r ! 4.94 Al. C,� - \- 2.. \ �� 1 �� �. ?3pg _ . . •i . SEE tup Hz A :- _ -;:_•.-.3,„6.6: ...- --. • 'GRAMPIAN NIL _ 7. . . - (S EC..2) . . Q / I . �.• ,� f ' e, - - 4. : 9iiT - y / 0 5sost . _ . 3 _ ', wy ��c� 642 AC-- 1 . e ,�� { _ 10 98$3- - _ t likrP :; ! / c - ca.," oN. 6,,. . ia3las;; • 78`4 04=2.8548g".:. tQ-/� - v` / Q --%? �e -� 0 2532 f .•'`� . . *fit r �. '+2. 29 '` - - - - - - �� 3.37 AC. f 12.73 Au. f . _ '+ '.' -_ - cl° 7557 . / _ - :% 8392, _ �:T332* 24 LAC. \ paw = ! .- '; .0‘ © 0.,- 2 39A� • h: .. 2 . - ` _• - - 2v3 AC i A -- I";: VI 15 _ usido5 _ . _ ._ _ _ _ _ .. • .. - -1- -. _ _ ,... . •-v". Ca - =_..- :. .• , i . , _ __ • _ _ _ ... _ MAPPL1CNr : . - . -- zONIHG= k..1 Rua/AL R2.5►DEN1A +j FRrE cr wAr�2si;�[p- 10R5f t r1 ._ ` l � iLtP D�1Gwann�l: QUQAL 6UFpERru �12y1� �RM Q2is� lA3�E� 6�,-- a . a. - � . l 12t - GRAMPIAN HILLS - SECTION THREE • 11.f1 CRATIA CC11:41 CERTIFICATION. AND APPROVALS = PRELTRT:: :a Y PE_L STAFF ASSIGNMENT:- Jane Garrett SKETCH PLAN: Received 6-19-86 Reviewed 7-23-86 PRELIMINARY PLAT: Received 8-11-86 Reviewed 8-1$--86 REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT: Received Reviewed NCDOT: DATE 9-11-86 CERTIFICATION JOe Haynes, Highway Maintenance Engineer SCHOOL BOARD (Orange/Chapel Hi LL-Carrboro) : DATE 8-19-.86 Cart/ficatier, R/A UTLITIES (O11ASA/Hi L Lsbo rough/Mebane/0 range A Laurance/Lur•hari3 : DATE - Certification OTHER :. Recreation Advisory Caunci L 9 .11-86 Black _ (Date) Verbal comment Tr/ Carrboro Fire Department - 9-2-86 Swioer [Date) as requirements: . Chapel Hi L L • (Date) Carrboro �-2-86 Shepard R(Date) Hi LLsborough [Date) Durham (Date) Other- S s E 8-21-86 Faircloth . [Date) _ Health Department 6.2/-86 Burns - (Date) - • PLANNING BOARD: Data Approve I, - Approval with Conditions Denial BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS_ : Date Approve Approval with Conditions Denial • • • .r,;- •t L RQ Box337 •;� a r r o r 3pT Vest Mater Street Cafo►aw 27510 ' t9 i )942- / ". - t'r<aC• ..r7'Y:Y ��e:."'S^M: ~ . �,- .�:,�- ' .,... v�,-- �,�,.__.. -. r..•=cxl R ' August 29, 1986 Mrs. Jane Garrett Orange County Planning Department _ 106 East Margaret Lane Hillsborough, NC 27278 RE: Grampian Hills-Section 3, Lots 1 and 2 . Subdivision Courtesy Review Dear Jane: The Carrboro Town staff has completed its review of the subdivision plan referenced above and offers the following comments.. The proposed subdivit- sion is located in an area, which in our jurisdiction would likely be R-40 and therefore would comply with the minimum lot size requirement. The Town of Carrboro recommends approval of the subdivision request, as submitted.. Sincerely, -c:1[4e&IPe SOITED G. regory Shepard - Zoning Administrator GGS:sgm © EC 1 En • ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT .12t HILLSBOROUGH NORTH CAROLINA. 27278 AUS 2 I t '4 caw August 19, 1986 Greg Shepard - Carrboro Planning Department - 301 West Main Street - Carrboro, NC 27510 Re: Section Three of Grampian Hills - Tax Map 117 Lot 24 - Dear Greg: _ This is a major subdivision for your courtesy review_ -Please provide your comments by September 2, 1986 as I will need to include your comments in the agenda packet for the September meeting. Also, please coordinate your = - comments-with Chief Swiger should he have any. However, this property is - located within the White Cross Fire District. Tours truly, ' OLLLe - Jane A. Garrett. - • JAG/j g Enclosure C141;t6.11 _ o ECEIVE 1-2- %b 7tAlle"4";/21. e ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT HILLSBOROUGH 12t NORTH CAROLINA. _ 27278 e•�dr .,0 'ob coo MEMORANDUM 'O: Jane A. Garrett, Planner FROM: Warren Faircloth, Erosion Control Officer SUBJECT: Stormwater Management Plan for Grampion Rills Section 3 DATE: August 21, 1986 - I have reviewed the plan for this subdivision and find that it meets the Ordinance requirements. 'he plan proposes to Use the large lot size _- to reduce the amount of runoff and the buffer around the impervious ----_. - surfaces to absorb and filter the runoff.• - • Warren Faircloth - ECEIVEC) 131 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT HILLSBOROUGH NORTS CAROLINA. 27278 - • •` 4:tiz7_,(j_ • August 19, 1986 10-.E:10 _- 0214074aro Joe Haynes, Highway Maintenance Engineer f - NC Department of Transportation - - - _ Route 3 Box 3 Hillsborough, NC 27278 Re: Section Three of Grampian Hills Subdivision Dear Mr. Haynes: Enclosed is the Preliminary Plan of the abovereferenced subdivision for your review. The property is referenced as Tax Map 117 Lot 24 in Chapel Hill Township and located on the south side of SR 1946 (Bowden Road). This tract is approxi- mately 410 feet west of the intersection of SR 1946 and SR 1942 (Jones Ferry Road). The applicant is proposing two (2) .,lots to be used for single family units. A joint driveway is proposed with direct access onto SR 1946. Please provide your comments by Septemmber 2, 1986_ It wilt be greatly appreciated. Tours truly. Jane A_ Garrett Planner - JAG/jg r September 5, 1986 . • Enclosure Dear Jane: - Sight Distance is adequate and no driveway permit is required. o ECEIUE . = s y,-MOMS Joe S_. Haynes tliginiay Maintenance DRAFT PBM 9.15-86 , PAGE 14 131 requires a minimum lot sizelof. 40,000 square feet or 0.92 acres . \, / The Health Department has granted approval of the proposed . lot. Police protection would be provided by the Orange County Sheriff 's Department, while \ fire protection would be provided by, the Ef l and ,Rural Fire District. T re is no traffic count avail♦ lab Ie for Frazier Roa . However, an additional 9.5 trips per day woul be generated by the subdivision. 1 The alining; Staff recommends `\pprovai of the Preliminary Plan . Walters expressed concern that plec -meal developer is occurring en Frazier Road. Co'Ilins 'responded that most applicants have no Fong- ,Mans for subdivision ■of the remainder of their roperty. This does create problems when pl nning future roads . \, MOTION: K i ze r moved apprva I`. Second td by Waite s. VOTE: 9 n favor (Shank I (n out of the room) . 1#6.*. g . Grampian Hills: Section 3 - Preliminary Presentation by Kirk . ' �4T This agenda item Is to consider approval of the Preliminary Plan for Grampian Hills - Section Three Subd ivision, property of Mrs. Y. Z. Cannon. The property in question is located in Chapel Hill Township on the south side of Bowden Road (SR 1946) . It is referenced as Lot 24 of Tax Rap 117. The tract has direct access on Bowden Road. It is borderd by residential development. There are two (2) lots proposed out of 4.54 acres, the lot sizes are 2.25 acres and 2.29 acres. The zoning of the property is Rural Residential (R -1 ) with an overlay zoning designation of University Lake Protected Watershed (PW-II ) . The Land Use Plan designation is Rural Buffer and University Lake Water Supply Watershed . The R--1 , PW-ll zoning designations require a minimum lot size of 40,000 square feet or 0.92 acres. The Health Department has granted approval to both IV 132 DRAFT PBM 9-15-86 PAGE 15 lots in the subdivision . Police protection would be provided by the Orange County Sheriff 's Department, while fire protection would be provided by the White Cross Fire District. The Final Plat for Section One of Grampian Hills was approved on July 23, 1971 . There were five (5 ) lots proposed out of approximately 12.5 acres. The average lot size was 2.5 acres. All lots have direct access onto Jones Ferry Road (SR 1942) . The Final Plat for Section Two of Grampian Hills was approved on October 4, 1976. There were nine (9) lots proposed out of approximately 21.51 acres. The average lot size was 2.39 acres. Lots 1 , 2, 3, 4, 8 and 9 have access on Laine Road and Lots 5, 6 and 7 have access on Ann Lane. Both roads were construct- ed to NCDOT standards for a local residential street ( 18 foot wide pavement) and dedicated for public use . The 1985 traffic count on Bowden Road (SR 1946) was 300 trips per day as determined from the intersec- tion of SR 1005 . An additional 19 trips per day would be generated by the subdivision.. The Planning Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan contingent upon the following conditions: ( 1 ) Indicate the tax map and lot references on the plat; (2) The spelling of Grampian must be changed to provide consistency for all three sections. Jacobs asked the applicant why a Joint driveway why a Joint driveway was indicated. The applicant responded that the joint driveway was recommended by the Planning Staff . MOTION: Best moved approval with the Joint driveway. Shanklin noted that he had seen no evidence to warrant a Joint driveway. Best indicated his preference for Joint driveways. Motion was seconded by Kramer. VOTE: 9 in favor . 1 opposed (Shanklin) . O R A N G E C O U N T Y BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date Octob.er 6.1_120 Action,4g nda item f SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO INITIATE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS DEPARTMENT: PLANNING __ -- PUBLIC HEARING Yes ._.X__ No Attachment(s) Information Contact: JANE GARRETT Location Map Ordinance Excerpt Telephone Numbers -� Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 967-9251 PURPOSE: To consider a request to authorize the County Attorney to initiate legal proceedings for a zoning violation on property. owned by Charles and Marilyn McLamb . NEED: Administrative procedures to address this zoning violation have been exhausted. Staff is requesting that legal proceedings be initiated to bring the property owner into compliance with the Orange County Zoning Ordinance. The violation is as follows: CHARLE$_AND_ MAR ELYll_ U CHEEKS TWP. TAX MAP 51A LOT 2 SEVEN MILE FALLS The property owner is operating a Motor Vehicle Repair Shop (See attached map) . A garage which serves as the shop was being constructed on the property without building and zoning permits. The property owner was notified of the required permits of which he obtained. The restrictions on the building permit stated that the "garage is for single family home and will not be used for business" . The property is zoned R-1 (Rural Residential ) . Use of the property for a motor vehicle repair shop Is not permitted in a R--1 district. The property owner was notified of the zoning violations on September 30, 1985, August 4, 1986, August 29, 1986 and Sep- tember 4, 1986 . Mr. McLamb was informed of the violation of the commercial garage on all occasions. The motor vehicle repair shop is still in operation with vary- ing numbers of vehicles on site frequently. IMPACT: Article 23 V IV I OLALLQtLS PEBALTI E_AnD_RFMEQIE1 of the Orange Ih 134 County Zoning Ordinance provides that "whenever . . . the performance of any act is prohibited or whenever any regulation, dimension or limitation is imposed on the use of any land, or on the erection or alteration or the use or change of use of a structure, or the uses within such structure, a failure to comply with such provisions of this ordinance shall constitute separate violation and a separate offense." The Ordinance further provides for remedies exercised by th Zoning Officer to address the violations. The administrative procedures followed in determining if a violation has occurred are as follows: 1 . receipt of complaint or identification of violation by staff; 2. investigation of violation by Zoning Officer, including preparation of violation file and photographs, where feasible; 3. notification of property owner of potential violation, including citation of ordinance and request to discuss matter with Zoning Officer (sometimes consecutive with issuance of STOP WORK ORDER) ; 4. second notice of violation; 5. if property owner brings violation into compliance, file is closed ; if violation continues, advice of County Attor- ney is sought. Administrative procedures fvr,: this violation have been ex- hausted . The property owner demonstrates a continuing dis- regard of the Zoning Ordinance. Authorizing the County Attorney to pursue legal action would substantially remedy the violation and would clearly put those in violation on notice of the intent of the County to pursue remedies to correct zoning violations. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the County Attorney to pursue legal action. , .. . . 1 3 't - I( . . till A313.1.IR2:33:351RS:311'at3ILCI:NC2ICC3,OCis_--S:or=;22:r2!;3:AsiMipta ! - - ; I :! . il ; i•521 Laundry i Ory 1 ' ' . I - - : i • Cleaning Services , . . • i . • 1.: *I Of IP. oP . • I7 4 • P . • • 1 I • ; III; el Of II; . 1 414 322 tihracies I I 1 : ! , I / • • I : 1 . • • / I ii .. ! • • .7 1. : 1.• ff.; .. •• 523 Motor fteight Terminals ..,, • : P Motor Vehicle :1n .aincenance : ... , 4 Repair (30dy Shop) . . . : . •• ••• 4rt. , . .„-.,—,—,............_,_„„.,_,,, _ • . . . . . • , . / • . i - ' 525 Motor Vehicle Sales ' I . ' ; i •- • • : II : _ .. - I. Rental (New ; Used) . i . . , 7 : 7' { •C PPP . . ..'• - 6 I 1 : : : ; i1 i : • ■ • : i • : i 326 Motor Vehicle Services , • I g i ; I - 0 P - = I. ; i ; : ,- ■ I : • Stations • / I 1 I • 7 • : •: .1 •1 .I ei = I - • 1. - " . i 1 - • ' 1 : ! i ' -: ' i • t • t . •' : 1 : I. ' • 1 I - - " • : ' 7. 329 Offices 5 Personal . ; •I ! .- : • ' ! : : r • .1 - ! ' . .. E ! : • : j : , . - - _ , • Services, That Attract I I ; • ; • I • ' " ' . ••,.. : 4. 1.- r. - , • , : / i : ' . ; i !.' , .- ,, t _ ' . :• . Fro Cumittneers Or Climes , I : . i . : 1 • ,. • :: . • , t ; 1 - - . - . On Presiaiss Other Than . . i • , • , . 1 1 • : : ; - ; 6 I •;• • - ; i I' • Employees, Generate Loy I , 1 , • • , • . • - ' - - - I . : : i ; F z ; - r :Traffic VoLuoes, save No 1 . •i , , : 6 1 r r. - - _ • . . . - a - : ; : • 1 T i ' Adverse DapaCZN 3eyond I i / • - The'Space ft=pied 3y • I I • ; ' - , ' : ' - r - - - . • 1 , 1 1 • - ; • ! • The 3ttilditg . , . I : 1 *I vo •: or s! • w. .7 466 or - • j . ' . ; ! • _ • '- . ' • I - I : : I • ! '. : _ 329 Offices a Perstmal . al ; : . iF , 7 : - . • Services That , : 1 ' 1 . - / ' Iii • : ! r - _ - - i . • Generate Medium 1 ! I ! i • ' - - - : .•• 7- • ; 1 ' • : ` t • Traffic Volumes 4.-. I _ : I . . - • I : . 1 : , : . • . • - - _ _ Save No Adverse • . • ; • . . ■ 1 • , - . Li:paces 3eyond e . ••' I ! j • • • .1. .. ,. _ . - . 1 • . . - • Lae Boundaries • 1 , , - • •-• _., ...: • . . ...• •. - • : i • , . . . ' 530 Offices A Personal .• ! ; 1 ; • ! ' 1 ! ! i ' • - • ' . • . • : • , . - : . — • • P Services That .. : Generate Stgh Traffic ■ . . • • • r • • . : . . . . Volumes i Save No • ' . 5 _• 1 : ' i : : ' - - . 1- - - • Adverse 2mpacts • 1 • • a ! . . • - a.. - : • '; 3eyond The Zoning , . • . . . , • ! / • . . _ • District 3oundary • . •; .- - 7 . • ; • I . . . • . . . , ; . S3l Petroleum Products: t • . . 5torige ; Oistribution . . .., .: ... .- . . • . . • . . . . 332 Postal 1 Parcel i • • - - • , - : • t - Oelivery Services . • •- . r ; , • . , : , • ' • . r . •_ . i . S33 Printing 5, lithograPhY : I ' ' • i - • . • • . • • - ••. lw• et . i ! ! • C . e • _ • AR;Rai 32:a3 I R4 i R5 I aS i R13'".. INC2I...-C3-GC:.=•-•3;CI i EX.:.21.T2:=711;IS Mt Pitt 4-16 ( -- i 1,3 `Z - N ..-.,_ I f a •\ , 5 • •N ` N... y r_ ° ■ Bguw N ` NOa _ • - 2uAb � • s a: - • B4 `e.. i �� ? - 64A. - -y r ry'561' PROPANT9 of C A s • w ° AN) MAA/lyAVl44.12 q 1.04 AC r ' i . > ' �. J I ■ • �` 2 4I aC 1. 9r a_ - I ' k---- `� - - 7 AC -32% - -� �•i i i 12 I.B3 AC. .� e SEVEN 'vita FALLS ...... CIwis 'awn,' IP . .. TAX MAP 51A Mir 2. m F Er � Of.�•Trv6�d/e.DbsN�olJl�,yi�la4fl;�. 6rwl..lflwE fl//6.C.Iq/�'f jq/ J RtEiVidrl66d Opt/T�/�4 dL.e/p /s•/v .•„s. -d.0"4j- 0.�� �G9tOC CST V4 L6riorf .LY � M4L�t/!T!C .VI,! •. a > O4!4vC6CrldNSY JYdEVyrr.ON -� s y _o 0 R!.L. 'v ¢'�6: o s'E —.. �G.C.iI�ao.Aoo' 8-GRrC.o • •�i3<� � � �;.. . 9 ZEI�aa9a EXrr i 5� 6d6 00 /.LS!�S• 'rte-P.s�� a✓!!r.¢ 1.0 or •2ao s• T:TO� I'c,..�,ww r< s90 • .vim! n ,. `P. z� ��� n,c.'aas�. s/taM� .Q.'' 4by �d .. y CO.s I 'F c F c E.”' +04.L �oNTOd.6v\� S'EC. �fl. ND. //.�'fC- +�, a• �V Q1 k� \. A � os�..cevzcc agrd/+* --1-------►�� 40 a,Q CO ii x a eq vlcs .r.o P FI NJ9.l. Jo/ i^. 7?i S'iNYYJt Y.1L17. qr"w Aw" JAW bp� ^it \� 7 ~' - •' by O G t-m o_ Ci/Ed.Ca� TWp. O.Q.4NGE G�OU/V T Y – •� � oTCA�E,• /s/DO'aTr�evaYC'o.+�ocErEa it-c-T.9 \ e as '.� CAN cb z p n '!I'N///�.fl�lRJ'. .. f.N.1is/.�,T.+rO�• ....M.U. .+ .. - \ p Wcre 3 tom-i I+L Yl/ \ E� f r.n %,LW ? y I' �� e Il►urrlmlRVa K+airw.,.�. ,lY�fr,,,.r 0 �•�sQE��' � OTTE�'<�\ _ \ 7 .w r.t,.,,•,. � �r '•r .. . � � r 0 /YfE�jrVEr N.(r.� \ •`r<• ' ' ••,M + a�� '.:,.!': ..}::wre:::l•'rral!a S s�Ml Q1 �� �suYE.E'C` 96V�c�C OPEC ` + r x rt C +• ' '•' . �►.., •• ••,r ,r. boil 3, ,11!rj the f'39R16 .Ara Ti14A�MAP ,@�Cl+f4E'.tIC� '�' AV ti' ' r• �N ;R2 LOTNO. p. JVAO7t d� rr C '� '+w'+•I ,.r.,.�w+rn r.0 n.,;„, '�N 1 'l llr lr#mlrfl+rfr♦�I?�1!�T�II��itII,PI�1�1t IFIfPfRIP 1111+1'etl11${ ,orl-p1g4I.jo I i s 4ad�•a rrA�n i�vVd'i a■� •••yti•"tR SALf� �a�M+*1 r Cr;.rm, • t:rr v•' :ai'yw. �.■r.I.0 jrq r lawwe•9 Ya,+v, +li ill' YAlll+ y � ��•M�ul�ly,�lln+�in,1r•.�iRd�,�i.'jrlu�minr'+�indn�i,A�l�n,�.,1,�wlnl�dnn.�inllw�ir�lnn�nl.n�riuu�nhp�.�• . 13 t; ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action A 1 Item No. j ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: OCTOBER 6, 1986 SUBJECT: CABLECASTING BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MEETINGS DEPARTMENT: COUNTY MANAGER PUBLIC HEARING: Yes X No ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: MANAGER'S OFFICE,X501 Cablecasting Report Village Companies Original Offer TELEPHONE NUMBER: Village Companies Escrow Requirements Hillsborough - 732-8181 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 Mebane -- 227-2031 Durham - 688-7331 PURPOSE: To consider allocating matching funds for cablecasting of Board of Commissioners meetings. NEED: The Village Companies has offered up to $25, 000 as a matching grant to help the County, Town of Chapel Hill, Town of Carrboro, and Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools buy and share cameras and equipment for cablecasting. The Town of Carrboro and City School Board do not desire to participate. The Town of Chapel Hill accepted the offer on June 9, 1986. Recently received correspondence from the Village Companies earmarks I October 15, 1986 as the deadline for formal acceptance of the grant and January 15, 1987 as the final date for the deposit of matching funds into an escrow account. All grant funds must be expended by July 1, 1987. IMPACT: Matching grant funds were not allocated in the 1986-87 Budget for cablecasting. RECOMMENDATION(S) : As the Board decides. If the Board decides to accept the offer, the Village Companies should be requested to extend the matching grant deadline to a date after July 1, 1987 to coin- cide with the 1986-87 fiscal year. 1 O R A N G E C O U N T Y INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: County Manager FROM: Assistant County Manager SUBJECT: Cablecasting Commissioners' Meetings DATE: October 2 , 1986 On May 24, 1985, the President of the Village Companies offered up to $25, 000 as a matching grant to help local governments buy and share cameras and other equipment for cablecasting. Under this proposal, Village Cable would match any combination of funding by the Towns of Chapel Hill and Carrboro, Orange County and the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools. The cable company would also provide training at no charge. The equipment would be property of the participating governments. As indicated in Village's proposal, the total equipment cost would be approximately $66, 000. The only remaining cost would be personnel costs for a camera opera- tor. Since the submission of the Village Companies offer, the Town of Carrboro and the School Board have declined to participate, the Town of Chapel Hill accepted a modified version of the offer on June 9, 1986, and the County accepted the offer in principle. Although the School Board decided against participation in the cost sharing arrangements, representatives of the School Board along with the Town of Chapel Hill staff and County staff have met numerous times during the past year to discuss cablecasting. Meetings also included site visits to the respective meeting facilities and the viewing of telecasting operations in the triangle area. After viewing other operations, the Village Companies suggested considering a voice-activated camera switching iY system which selects automatically, according to which microphone is used, among pre-set cameras focused at places around a meeting table and other points in a meeting room. In essence, each board member and staff (manager and county attorney) would have lapel microphones which would trigger the camera mechanism when an individual speaks. The voice- activated system would require 6 pre-set stationary cameras (3 for the Commissioners, 1 for the staff, 1 for the podium and 1 for the easel area. The total cost would be approxi- mately $70, 000 excluding sound system, lighting and extensive wiring if required. The County cost less $12,500 contribution from the Village Companies (1/2 of $25, 000) would be $57, 500. INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM: 8607-801 1 4 C Cabelcasting Commissioners' Meetings July 2, 1986 Page 2 Advantages of Voice-Activated Switching System Cameras are pre-set, stationary and could be mounted on walls. - Cameras are unobstrusive with audience and commis- sioners being somewhat unaware of telecasting. - Reduced personnel cost compared to conventional system. Two camera operators would not be required. However, a director/coordinator would be needed at least initially. - Lapel microphones are inconspicuous. Disadvantages of Voice Activated Switching System - Lapel microphones are very sensitive. All sounds would be transmitted including coughs and paper rustling. However, lapel microphones can be provided with switches for temporary turn off. - Cameras are pre -set and stationary. Cameras can not be transported to different meeting sites. - Speaker must speak from pre-arranged position. Since the cameras are pre-set, the speaker can move partially or entirely out of the field of view. However, by setting a broad field of view for each camera, this problem can be limited. The conventional two-camera system proposed by the Village Companies (see attachment) would cost approximately $50, 000 excluding lighting and sound system. Advantages of Conventional System - Cameras are not pre-set allowing unlimited field of view. - Cameras can be transported to different meeting sites. - Town of Chapel Hill will implement this system. Town of Carrboro has similar system using one camera under an arrangement with Alert Cable. All County residents would be viewing comparable systems for all local governmental meetings. 141 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM: 8607-801 Cabelcasting Commissioners ' Meetings July 2 , 1986 Page 3 Disadvantages of Conventional System - Extremely noticeable to everyone in the meeting room. - Requires personnel to operate cameras. - May require altering of seating arrangements in small meeting facility. Other Concerns - The Commissioners Room in the Hillsborough Court- house is not suitable for cablecasting. The room can not accommodate cameras, equipment and citi- zens. All meetings would have to be held in the superior courtroom. Additional lighting and a new sound system would have to be installed. Conceivably, the improvements could be accomplished without altering the historical character of the superior courtroom. Cameras and related equipment could be positioned on the third floor utilizing the large window above the courtroom. The Chapel Hill courtroom would require additional lighting and a sound system. The courtroom is large enough for cameras and related equipment. The conference room at the Lincoln Center could serve as meeting room, however, meeting dates would have to be coordinated with the Chapel Hill- Carrboro School Board. This facility would permit a shared cablecasting arrangement with the school board. 1 EQUIPMENT 14 k SIX VOICE-ACTIVATED TWO CONVENTIONAL STATIONARY CAMERAS CAMERA Approximate Cost $70,000 $50. 00 Village Grant $12,500 $12,000 _ .... . _ CountVCost $57,000 $37,500 (2 x $57,500 if systems (Camera and equipment can are installed in be transported to meeting Hillsborough and Chapel sites) (2 x $37,500 if Hill) systems are installed in Hillsborough and Chapel Hill) Personnel (Director/Coordinator) (Two Camera Operators) $5,000 $5,000 Annually Annually Transportation (If desired) Motor Pool van at County mileage rates. Personnel cost is included above) Lighting and Sound System $5,000 $5,000 Contingency Includes inflationary Includes inflationary factor, installation, factor, installation, extensive wiring, extensive wiring, structural changes structural changes $15,000 $15,000 TOTAL $82,500 $62,500 (One Location) With all factors considered, the conventional system would be more advantageous at a cost of $62,500. Ubtt Albert ittrel � AK/srs cc: Board of Commissioners • RECT AUG 2 6 1986 14 K illy e Companies Av 88 McClamroch Circle•P.O. Box 3300•Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27515.9191968.4811 Robert E.Woodruff Vice President and Controller August 22, 1986 Mr. Ken Thompson Orange County Manager 106 E. Margaret Lane Hillsborough, NC 27278 Dear Ken: In May 1985, Village Companies offered a grant to Chapel Hill, Carrboro, Orange County and the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools to match expendi- tures, up to a total of $25,000, for the purchase of equipment and related . non-personnel costs to.cablecast public meetings by these governmental bodies. • The initial offer was accepted by Chapel Hill and Orange County, and Orange County indicated it would fund the City School matching funds. In order to provide an orderly process for this grant, the following . procedure is established for allocation and disbursement of the matching funds. By October 15, 1986, those who wish to participate in this procedure should . indicate their intent to participate by notifying us in writing. In this way, each will know the amount of the required escrow deposit. Based on the number of participants, each will deposit its pro rata portion • . of $25,000 into an escrow account on January 15, 1987. At that same time, Village Companies will deposit an amount equal to the total of such deposits . up to $25,000. Earnings on the escrow account will be used to offset any escrow agent fees with any excess to be distributed to those who made the initial deposits (including Village Companies) on a pro rata basis, based on the initial deposits. The funds will be disbursed to the appropriate governmental body up to a maximum of twice the amount of its initial deposit upon submission of copies of invoices for amounts spent for cablecasting equipment and related non-personnel costs. On July 1, 1987, any funds remaining from the . initial contribution by any governmental body will be returned. The balance of The Village Companies' contribution is available to match additional invoices from the other governmental bodies. If there are no additional invoices to be matched, the balance will be returned to Village Companies. ' =;,r.s•%';ctr_;ir. ,':, S Inc.'J'.CriL.Chapel C.•V,I!npn Cnneocni,.a!i ns,Inc.WKQQ, Ltx n''on,Ky.•Vi loom 6roadcastin ,In c.VJZ?U, N.C. . .;,wvts,i-c,'Frr: i ar F< e;.Sporl3 i i tV/0.k,l;hap°I Hill, N.C.•-fie Print Shop,Inc.Chapel Lliil and Durham,N.C.���� Corp.The Viet;; e Ai locate- Cirectcries.The Tr in;lyie Pointer,Vil IaF�o rPrinting Co.,C Mail Advoc,t a, Chapel Hill,M.C. 4"['ags Ci&o,Inc.Chapoi Hill, )r,nve Ccunt ,CnjTh;m County,Fit;ahoro,N.C.•Village Video Productions,Inc.Chapel Hill,N.C. • 144 Examples: Initial Deposits - If two governmental bodies agree to participate by October 1, each will deposit $12,500. If there are three, each will deposit $8,333. Distributions from Escrow - If there are three participants, submission of copies of invoices of $16,666 or more will cause disbursement of $16,666 to that participant. On July 1, 1987, if only one participant has submitted and received payment for invoices for $16,666, then it • may submit copies of invoices totaling up to $33,334 and it will receive up to an additional $16,667. The other two participants will receive their $8,333 back at that time. If on July 1, 1987, two participants have obtained their maximum out of the escrow account, there will be $16,666 remaining in the account, with $8,333 to be returned to the participant who did not expend any funds and $8,333 will be eligible for matching on an equal basis among the two participants who did expend funds. If not used, the $8,333 will be returned to Village Companies. Should you have any questions, please contact me. Best regards, A4 Robert E. Woodruff . REW/kab cc: Don Willhoit • • • APPENDIX 1 The Villagle Companies 88 McClamroch CirclelP,O. Box 3300 Chapel Hill,North Carolina 27514 9191968-4811 �� Jsmes A.Hsarner .President May 24, 1985 Mayor Joe •Nassif• Mr. David Taylor Mr. Don Willhoit Town of Chapel Hill . Town Manager Chairman 306 North Columbia Street 306 North Columbia Street Orange County Board Chapel Hill, N.C. 27514 Chapel Hill, N.C. 27514 of Commissioners 203 Lexington Road Chapel Hill,.N.C. 27514 Mr. Ken Thompson Mayor Jim Porto Mr. Robert Morgan County Manager Town of Carrboro Town Manager 106 East Margaret Lane 301 West Main Street 301 West Main Street Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 Carrboro, N.C. 27510 Carrboro, N.C. 27510 Mr. Ted Parrish Dr. Pamela Mayer Chairman . . Superintendent . Chapel Hill--Carrboro Chapel Rill-Carrboro • Board of Education City Schools Lincoln Center Administrative Offices . Merritt Mill Road ' Merritt Mill Road Chapel Hill, N.C. 27514 . Chapel Hill, N.C. 27514 Dear Dr. Mayer and Gentlemen: WCHL and Village Cable's Chapel Hill-Carrboro Forum was a significant success by every measurement we use. Perhaps its most important immediate outcome is that it convinced me, .and those of you with whom I have talked, about the ability to go ahead and move immediately on making available your regular discussions . to the widest possible audience through exposure through cable TV. At one time or another, I have discussed with nearly all of you the benefits of. an inter- agency partnership to combine the cost of a production package to cablecast all of your public meetings. The principal benefits are: 1) By combining costs, we significantly lower the entry level expense to begin the project. 2) By combining resources, the pooled funds can buy significantly enhanced production capabilities which, if paid by a single agency, might prove. to be unacceptably expensive in one lump. And,. 3) The equipment can be used with more efficiency and less waste than if • each agency begins with its own equipment, which would. sit idle during • the time when you were not in session. • • Village Broadcasting,Inc.WCHL.Chapel Hill.N.C. • Village Communications,Inc.WKOO. Lexington,Ky. • Village Radio of Wilmington,Inc.WWOQ.Wilmington,N.G. • Vi icom Broadcasting,Inc.WZZU, Raleigh/Burlington.N.C. • Village Sports,Inc.The Tar Heel Sports Network,Chapel Hill.N.C. • The Print Shop,Inc.Chapel Hill and Durham,N.C. • • Village Publishing Corp.The Village Advocate,University Directories,The Triangle Pointer,Village Printing.Mali Advocate,Viand Toys • Village Cable,Inc.Chapel Hill,Orange County.Chatham County.PittsboSo.N.C. •• Village Video Productions,Inc.Chapel He;.K C.. • - :Page 2. 14t Now, because of the success of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro Forum, and after conversations with several of you, Village Cable wishes to offer an incentive, or challenge, grant to those agencies who would like to take advantage of it to begin immediate cablecasting of its public sessions. The terms of our offer are as follows: 1) The amount of the grant will be $25,000. 2) It will be presented to whatever combination of one or more government agencies among you who wish to participate in the purchase of a production package by at least matching that amount in the aggregate. For example: if only one government body wishes to accept our offer, it would match our grant with its own allocation of at least $25,000, or whatever amount above $25,000 that it may wish to use to purchase the package or production equipment of .its choice. If two agencies accept this offer and wish to participate, they would join with an allocation of at least $12,500 each. Three agencies, at least $8,333; four agencies, $6,250. 3) Village Cable will also coordinate the purchase of the equipment, and train those staff people at each agency whom you designate in the operation of the equipment. Because the quality of the production can be a positive reflection upon all of us, Village Cable will provide as much "hands on" training as is necessary to ensure that the quality of the coverage will be equal to that done by our own production staff. It is not difficult to learn to use the equipment, and each-staff will have some members who have a predilection to find the project enjoyable and will have the facility for rapidly developing the skills. 4) If Carrboro desires to become involved, Village Cable will immediately make all of its government agency programming available to the Carrboro system by allowing Carrboro to tap onto the Village Cable system .at any point where it is now active, including any of our trunk which now traverses Carrboro. And Village Cable will agree to take the government agency feed of the Carrboro public meetings at any point where it is made available to Village Cable at the point where Village's trunk line upstream capability is now activated. It is our belief that the joint production package with two or three cameras will make possible a far superior production and one more "watchable" than is currently being produced out of town hall or has been proposed under the new franchise agreement in Carrboro. 5) Village Cable will make this cash contribution to significantly underwrite the beginning of the project; all of the ownership of the production equipment will be in the hands of the government agencies who accept the offer to participate and who organize an entity of their choice for joint ownership. The member agencies then determine what shall be cablecast and at what times. 6) The terms for those agencies who may wish to join the Government Agency Information Network at a later time would be determined by -:Page 3. 14 is the existing members. It is Village Cable's- desire to create an incentive for early acceptance. of this proposal by all agencies. There are two obvious benefits: 1) All those initial agencies may be involved in the process of determining the amount and kind of initial equipment ordered, and 2) significant equities would accrue to all those chartering agencies, because of the Village Cable contribution. In effect, each agency will own about twice as much . . production equipment as it would otherwise. - 7) Deadline for acceptance of offer: July 15, 1985. Village Cable's offer must be accepted in writing to me and be received in my office - no later than that date. Attached is a list for a proposed equipment package prepared by Village Cable's Director of Engineering, Rick Hollowell. As you can see, there are some options available which depend on funding levels. The two most important options are the third camera and the character generator. The third camera makes it possible to have a very clean production since -it can be used for a standard "cover shot", thereby avoiding the possibility that- production could be trapped in an unwanted cutaway shot while the other camera was being put in position. It also provides some redundancy, so that a two- shot program can continue if one camera malfunctions. The character generator permits the director to superimpose the .name of the person speaking when he or she is on the air. • Finally, I am assured that this system is of such a design that a reasonably well-motivated person with a desire to learn to use the equipment can be taught to use it fairly quickly. Mr. Hollowell estimates that our people could bring a novice crew up' to full proficiency by training them over the course of three meetings. The probable crew size will be three, although it could be done with two. The equipment may be stored anywhere at the choosing of the GAIN participating governments, but Village Cable is willing to act as a repository and assist in the necessary repairs at whatever the direct cost of the repair might be. Inevitably, questions will arise and we welcome them. I am convinced that we will not only do a better job of serving the constituencies of each of your agencies, but will also do a better job of promoting understanding among different parts of the county and between the two towns if GAIN has the widest possible agency participation. I'm hopeful that you and your board will agree in such a way. that timely action can occur. Thank you. <fret - S -rely, an :mjw - 14t MEMORANDUM TO: Jim Heavner FROM: Rick Hollowell RE: Basic Equipment for GAIN DATE: May 24, 1985 The following is a video equipment .package that I propose as a basic system for cablecasting government agency meetings over the Village Cable system. The basic package includes the following: 2 cameras, JVC KY310 at $7,200 each $14,400 2 camera control units at $1,700 each 3,400 2 cables at $700 each 1,400 2 zoom lenses, intercoms, remote monitor 2,800 - remote focus at $1,400. each 2 tripods at $800 each 1,600 1 video switcher 10,500 • 1 portable light package at $550 550 - includes 4 lights and stands 1 Return System Modulator at $2,300 2.300 Scientific Atlanta 6350 1 Audio Limiter 1.500 1 Return System Demodulator 2,000 Scientific Atlanta 6250 1 Waveform Monitor/Vectorscope 3,000 black and white camera monitors 550 - 1 row of 3 monitors color monitors 1,500 - set of 2 portable equipment rack 500 power cords and accessories 75 Basic Package Total $46,075 Page 2. 14 A third camera and associated equipment can be added to this package at an additional cost of approximately $11,800. A character generator can be added to this system for an additional $8000. A unit at this price would be capable of approximately 10 pages of titles or text. These additional items, which Village Cable recommends, would bring the total package price to approximately $66,000. The proposed system design would receive its audio feed from the existing sound systems, assuming the existing sound systems have a compatible interface for the Modulator's audio input. An audio system consisting of a mixer and 9 microphones would cost approximately $2600. The equipment cabinet that the switcher, monitors, camera control units, and modulator would be mounted in is portable, with front and back covers for protection during transit. If all these things are purchased as a package, chances are excellent that a discount could be negotiated, perhaps as much as 5%. Playback and recording VCR's could also be interfaced with the system. This proposed system has been designed for maximum efficiency, reliability and simplicity of operation. The overall quality of the system would be the same as that video quality we were able to achieve for the Chapel Hill-:arrboro Forum cablecast on May 8. Please let me know if you need any further information. • UKANUt LUUIY1T S BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS _ ACTION AGENDA - - - ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NO..GF. ' - MEETING DATE' October 6, 1986 5 . . SUBJECT: Approval of the•Schedule of Values, Stanndards and Rules • DDEPARTMENT:r PUBLIC HEARING: YES x .NO ATTACHMENTS) INFORMATION CONTACT: Kermit Lloyd - - 1987 Revaluation Manual and PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH 732-8181 - Schedule of Values • HILLSBOROUGH - 732-9361 • . - _ Ext 420 CHAPEL HILL - 967-9251 - { . • • MEBANE --227--2031- ' - ' DURHAM - 688-7331 PURPOSE: GS 105-317(c) (c) The schedules of values, standards, and rules required by subdivision (b)(1), above, shall be reviewed and approved by the board of county commissioners before they are used. When the board of county commissioners approves the schedules, standards, and rules, it shall issue an order adopting them and shall cause a copy of the order to be published in the form of a notice in a newspaper having general circulation in the county, stating in the notice that the schedules, standards, and rules to be used in the next scheduled reappraisal of real property have been adopted and that they are open to examination by any property owner of the county at the office of the tax supervisor for a period. of 10 days from the date of publication of the notice. (1) Any property owner of the county (separately or in conjunction with other property owners of the county) asserting that the schedules, standards, and rules adopted by the board of county commissioners under the provi- sions of this section fail to meet the appraisal standard established by G.S. 105-283 may except to the order and appeal therefrom to the Property Tax Commission at any time within 30 days after the date of the publication of the adoption order by filing a written notice of the appeal with the clerk of the board of county commissioners and with the Property Tax Commission. At the time of filing the notices of appeal,. the appellant or appellants shall file with the clerk of the board of county commissioners and with the Property Tax Commission.a written statement of the grounds of appeal. Upon timely appeal, the Property Tax Commission shall proceed under the provisions of G.S. 105-290(c). (2) The appeal procedure provided herein shall be the exclusive administrative means for challenging the order of the board of county commissioners adopting schedules, standards, and rules under this section. NEED: The purpose of the schedule of values is to provide a means by which all data on all properties, both during the revaluation and until the next revaluation, can be uniformly used to produce values that are equitable for the duration of the revaluation cycle. The schedule covers both land and improvements thereon. The schedule of values, being presented to you, were developed by the Orange County Tax Supervisor and his staff with the exception of the Use Value Schedule. This schedule covers all components of property that contributes to the value of.' any property found in Orange County. When used by a competent appraiser, this schedule will produce true and equitable values. It is also designed to help train any new appraisers as the need might arise. (con't) 15i ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Page Two Need: (Con't) In the development of this schedule over 7,000 sales were collected. Over 3,000 of the most recent sales were completely analyzed to find the weight of the contribution of each component part of each property until we could produce the selling price by using all the data on a parcel. All three approaches to value are to be considered in all appraisals using the approach that most suits the property. A. general role of thumb is, that replacement cost is used on newly constructed properties, that the comparison approach is used on older properties and vacant land, and the income approach is used on income producing properties. The Use value schedule was developed by N.C. State University along with a committee appointed by the General Assembly. Due to the current economic condition of farming and the use of the income approach to value, as required by law on use value, the value of farmland in the Use Value Program is down. The average looks to be about 40%, but in some cases as much as 90%. Impact: With the adoption of this schedule of values we will be able to apply the data on the 35,000 parcels in Orange County to the schedule and produce. current 1987 values. The notices of value can be mailed to the Taxpayers starting as early as November 15, 1986 and the Tax Supervisor would .start holding informal hearings with taxpayers very soon thereafter. What will be the impact on the taxpayer? I can only speak very generally and individual properties may vary greatly from these general statements. The largest increase will be in commercial property and property that is changing from one use to another, i.e: farm to suburban or single family to multi- family. The bulk of the properties which are residential should see a moderate increase in value of 30% to 50%. Farm properties that qualify for use value will see a decrease in use value but market value will be up. The impact of use value on the tax base will be much greater than ever before. Any taxpayer that feels that his or her appraisal is not the true value of their property will be given the opportunity to present their facts to an appraiser, employed by Orange County, not an outside appraisal firm, and if still not satisfied may present their facts to the Tax Supervisor. Every appealed property will be reappraised using all new information brought forth by the taxpayer, be it lower or be it higher. Marshall Evaluation Service has been used as a guide in the appraisal of some commercial properties and should be adopted as an addendum to the schedule of values. tecommendation: Approve COUNTY OF ORANGE HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA AND HAZEN AND SAWYER, P. C. AGREEMENT RE : STUDY AND EVALUATION OF ADDITIONAL WATER SUPPLY DEVELOPMENT IN ORANGE COUNTY 15 . ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Ag4nda Item No. Q ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: OCTOBER 6, 1986 SUBJECT: CONTRACT PROPOSAL TO STUDY AND EVALUATE ADDITIONAL WATER SUPPLY IN ORANGE COUNTY DEPARTMENT: COUNTY MANAGER PUBLIC HEARING: Yes X No ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: MANAGER'S OFFICE,X501 YES TELEPHONE NUMBER: Hillsborough - 732-8181 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 Mebane - 227-2031 Durham - 688-7331 PURPOSE: To consider a contract proposal from Hazen and Sawyer to con- duct a water supply development feasibility study in Orange County. NEED: To determine the feasibility and cost of constructing a new reservoir in the Upper Eno River Basin. To determine the feasibility of obtaining water from Jordan Lake as an alternative to constructing a new reservoir. To consider alternative methods to finance this project once a decision os made as to what Orange County needs. This contract is divided into two phases: Phase I has a cost ceiling of $40, 000 and Phase II has a cost ceiling of $20,000. $60,000 was approved in a Project Ordinance on July 23, 1986 for this prupose. RECOMMENDATION(S) : As the Board decides. - }R4HAZENANDSAWYER, .c. CONSULTING ENGINEERS October 1, 1986 Mr. Kenneth R. Thompson County Manager 106 East Margaret Lane Hillsborough, NC 27278 Re: Contract Proposal Study and Evaluation of Additional Water Supply Development in Orange County Dear Mr. Thompson: Hazen and Sawyer is pleased to submit herewith our contract proposal for a water supply development feasibility study for the County of Orange. Per our conversation, we have updated the scope of services contained in our May 1983 proposal as well as our estimate of related fees. As we understand your thoughts, this study would bring together previous reports by other engineers in the State of North Carolina and in general encompass the following: - Determine the feasibility and cost of constructing a new reservoir in the Upper Eno River Basin. At a minimum, consideration would be given to the Seven Mile Creek site and expansion of the existing Corporation Lake. - Determine the feasibility of utilizing Jordan Lake as an alternative to construction of a new reservoir including the possibility for creation of a regional system with costs and benefits shared by the benefactors. - Consider alternative methods of financing the proposed construction including a preliminary assessment of user fees. We have presented our scope of services (expanded from the May 1983 proposal) and fee estimates in our proposed engineering agreement as a matter of convenience and expedience (draft copy enclosed for your review and comments) . We have estimated that Phase 1 of the proposed study will take approximately six months; however, this can be adjusted based on your concern for study completion. 4300 GLENWOOD AVENUE•P.O.BOX 30428•RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA 27622•(919)782-8333 OFFICES IN NEW YORK,RALEIGH.AND HOLLYWOOD,FLORIDA Mr. Kenneth R. Thompson October 1, 1986 Page 2 We appreciate your consideration of Hazen and Sawyer for this most important study, and we look forward to the opportunity of working with you and your staff towards the successful implementation of a much needed water supply source. After you have had a chance to review the enclosed draft contract, we would be happy to discuss it in detail with you at your convenience. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, HAZEN AND SAWYER, P.C. Donald L. ordell, P.E. Associate DLC/jhl Enclosures 16'. ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action A nda Item No. ( ' �� ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: OCTOBER 6, 1986 SUBJECT: Drainage Easement Request by Town of Carrboro DEPARTMENT: COUNTY MANAGER PUBLIC HEARING: Yes No ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: MANAGER'S OFFICE,X501 YES TELEPHONE NUMBER: Hillsborough - 732-8181 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 Mebane - 227-2031 Durham -- 688-7331 PURPOSE: To consider a request from the Town of Carrboro for a drainage and curb easement across a lot located at the intersection of Broad and Hill Streets. NEED: The lot on which the easement is requested is 50 x 150 and the stream intersects the lot across the 50 foot width about the center of the lot. IMPACT: The impact of granting this easement would not present any problem since the lot is probably not a building lot. RECOMMENDATION(S) : Approve the easement request. 16t PIN: 9778-97-5883 Prepared by and return to TM#: 7.93.F.2 Jeffrey N. Mason Faison, Brown, Fletcher & Brough Post Office Box 1210 Chapel Hill, N.C. 27514 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ORANGE COUNTY DEED OF DRAINAGE EASEMENT THIS DEED, made this the day of , 1986, by and between ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, a North Carolina Body Politic, party of the first part, and the TOWN OF CARRBORO, a municipal corporation, 301 West Main Street, Carrboro, Orange County, State of North Carolina 27510, party of the second part: W7ITNE. SSE7.' �i: WHEREAS, the party of the first part is the owner of certain property located within the Town of Carrbora in the Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, State of North Carolina, which lands are more particularly described in a deed recorded in Book 270, Page 482, .of the Orange County Registry; and WHEREAS, the party of the second part desires to acquire drainage easements over, across, and under a portion of said lands for the purpose of constructing and maintaining said drainage easements; NOW, THEREFORE, the party - of the first part, in consideration of the sum of one dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, paid by the party of the second part, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has bargained and sold and by these presents does bargain, sell and convey unto the said party of the second part, its successors and assigns, a permanent and perpetual drainage easement over, across, and under the following tracts of land: Said easements shall be described as follows: TRA¢ oNE: BEGINNING at the southwestern intersection of the southern right-of-way of Hill(Lloyd) Street and the western right-of-way of Broad Street, and running thence (1) South 06053'40" East a distance of 14.33 feet, along Broad Street to a point; and running thence (2) North 51055'12" West a distance of 20.24 feet, the hypotenuse of they triangle; and running thence 1.13L- (3) North 83002'03" East a distance of 14.32 feet, along Hill(Lloyd) Street to the point and place of BEGINNING, all as shown on that certain "Drainage Easement Map" by the John R. McAdams Company, Inc., dated April 18, 1986. TRACT TWO: BEING fifteen feet (15') on both sides of the centerline of the drainage ditch presently located on the aforementioned property. The said easement is granted for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a drainage way- or drainage ditch, together with the right to cut and remove such trees, growth, and other natural or man made obstructions in, upon and along said drainage easement as may interfere with the installation, laying, upkeep and maintenance of said drainage easement. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid rights, privileges and easements unto the party of the second part, and its successors and assigns, for its use and enjoyment forever, so that neither the party of the first part nor any other persons claiming through the said party of the first part, will nor may hereafter claim or demand any right or title to the rights, privileges and easements herein, but the party of the first part shall by these presents be excluded and forever barred. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the said party of the first part has caused this easement to be signed by its duly authorized parties and its seal to be hereunto affixed by authority of its Board of Commissioners the day and year first above written. THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS BY: Chairman (SEAL) ATTEST: Clerk of the Board 17U STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF I , a Notary Public of the county and State aforesaid, certify that personnally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument by Chairman of the Orange County Board of Commissioners, and the seal was affixed hereto by authority of the vote and approval of the Orange County Board of Commissioners, as attested by herself as Clerk of the Board. Witness my hand and notarial seal this day of , 1986. Notary Public My Commission expires: 39N28 uKHiYUG 4VUlY1 1 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NO.Gil • MEETING DATE' OCTOBER,%S# 1986 171 SUBJECT: Tax Refunds and Release Request DEPARTMENT: Tax=Superiisor- I PUBLIC HEARING: YES X NO .� . , ATTACHMENT(S): Individual Re ques1 INFORMATION CONTACT: Kermit Lloyd. a PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH - 732-8181 - HILLSBOROUGH - 732-9361 CHAPEL HILL - 967-9251 2 • MEBANE 227--2031.. ' DURHAM 688-7331 • . PURPOSE: . To consider 10 request for refund-and/or release of tax bills. • • • • NEED: General Statute '105-381 C67 - Action' of Governing Body -. Upon receiving a taxpayers written statement - of defense and request for release or refund, the governing body of the Taxing Unit shall within 90 days after receipt of such a request . = determine whether the taxpayer has a valid defense 'to the tax-imposed • or any part thereofand shall either ielease or refund that portion of • the amount that is determiend to be in excess of the current liability or notify the taxpayer in writing that no release or refund will be • • made. • IMPACT: Refund according to attached individual request. - • • RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve • TWP 7 17 ACCT 0 99298 TRACTI? 727972 MAP 122A.B.28 Zinn Group BILL# 8645912 #12 The Courtyard 431 W. Franklin St. Chape]: Hill, N.C. 27514 a COMMENT: Residence was valued at 100% complete 1-1-86. - Should be 5% 1=1-86. Value changed from $95,'029 to $24,824. ACTION REQUESTED: Refund r • • • RECOMMENDATION: Refund GO 435.27 SC 21:06 • G2 491.'43 CH 139.71 $1087:47 ORDER : • DATE: 8/26/86 TWP 4 1f ACCT i 60914 TRACT# 422458 MAP 4:4::18 C • ] , Ray W. Queen BILL# Rt 2, Box 1240 Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 • COMMENT: Real property erroneously included a doublewide mobile home which was actually a leasehold in the name of Ralph Queen. • ACTION REQUESTED: Refund tax overpayment for 1983, 1984, 1985 based on valuation difference of $14,190 1983 1984 1985 GO 78.05 78.05 82.30 FA 4.26 4.26 5.68 $82.31 $82.31 $87.98 TOTAL: $252.60 RECOMMENDATION: Approve ORDER : DATE: • TWP 3 17q ACCT # 5007 TRACT# 301259 MAP 3.43..23A C ] Larry E. Squires BILL# Rt 2, Box 66 Mebane, N. C. 27302 l COMMENT: Overtaxed for 1984 mobile home in 1985. • ACTION REQUESTED: Refund tax overpayment for 1985 based on valuation difference of $1,000 GO (.0058) 5.80 - FB (.00025) .25 $ 6.05 RECOMMENDATION: Approve. ORDER : DATE:. TWP Bingham ACCT # 104677 17L TRACT# 600672 MAP 6.16. .5 Estate of Enita Stokes ] BILL Capital Management Group First Union National Bank First Union Plaza, CGM_10 [ Charlotte, NC 28288 COMMENT: Due to a mapping error,above referenced tract was appraised at 311.6 acres in lieu of the actual 239 acraes. ACTION REQUESTED: Refund tax overpayment for years 1983, 1984, and 1985 $269,445 1983 1984 1985 208,046 $ 399 (Valuation Difference) GO 337.69 337.69 356.11 . FF 24.56 24.56 24.56 362.25 362.25 380.67 = $1105.17 • RECOMMENDATION: Approve ORDER : DATE: [WV 82061 AccT I 17' TRACT!! 727302 MAP 98A..23 [ � Liesch, Herman R & Doris M BILL# 8544611 1270 Regency Place South Plainfield N.J. 07080 • [ a COMMENT: Real estate value incorrect on January 1 , 1985. The building was not started accounting for the change in value from $45,430 to $5,500 • ACTION REQUESTED: Refund overpaid taxes RECOMMENDATION: GO 221.61 SC 9.98 G1 301.47 CH 70.28 $ 603.34 ORDER : • DATE: 4/17/86 • TWP 7 ACCT , $2079 1 71 TRACTL& 727320 MAP 98A..41 Liesch, Herman R & Doris M. BILL# 8544629 1270 Regency Place South Plainfield, N.J. 07080 COMMENT: Property was over valued 1/1/85. Bldg appraised at 100% only 65% • ACTION REQUESTED: Refund- RECOMMENDATION: GO 71.74 SC 3.23 Cl .97.59 CH 22.'75 15375T- ORDER : 4/18/86 DATE: TWP 7 ACCT 96275 TRACTI 17t MAP Tarheel Dining Concepts, Inc. 8544211 N. Columbia St. BILL Suite 700 Chapel Hill, N.C. 27514 • COMMENT: Equipment leased by Tarheel. Dining Concepts, Inc. was double listed by the leasing company and by Tarheel Dining Concepts, Inc. ACTION REQUESTED: Refund the taxes RECOMMENDATION: 1985 refund based on $14,355 GO 79.67 SC 3.59 G2 98.33 CH 25.26 206.85 ORDER : DATE: 3/26/86 • TWP 7 ACCT # 37380 TRACT# 1 7� MAP 8542578 J & E, 'Inc. BILL Spanky's P.O. Box 7 Chapel Hill, N.C. 27514 • [ ] COMMENT: Equipment leased by J & E, Inc. was double listed by the leasing company and by J & E, YNc. • ACTION REQUESTED: Refund the taxes. • RECOMMENDATION: 1984 Refund based on $14,792 1985 Refund based on $54,607 GO 81.36 - GO 303.07 G2 101.33 SC 13:6 CH 23:08 . G2 374.06 $205.77 CH . 96.11 $786.89 ORDER : DATE: 3/26/86 TWP 5 ACCT # 11916 181, TRACT# 502341 MAP 5.21..69 BILL# Mr. Larry W. Melton Rt 5, Box 139 Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 COMMENT: The second residence was taxed at 100% complete on Jan 1, 1985 when it was actually only 10% complete. ACTION REQUESTED: Refund tax overpayment for 1985 based on difference of .$66,969 GO @ .0058 388.42 FE @ .0006 40.18 $428.60 RECOMMENDATION: Approve ORDER : DATE: iH TWP 4 ACCT 102708 TRACT# MAP 181. John Lewis Bradshaw BILL# 863476 116 Dixie Drive Chapel Hill, N.C. 27514 COMMENT: Due to clerical error value for household furnishings was listed incorrectly. ACTION REQUESTED: Refund overpayment in the amount of $37.62 r GO $20.46 SC .99 G3 16.17 $37.62 RECOMMENDATION: Approve ORDER : DATE: ORANGE COUNTY Action Agenda BOARD OF COIMIISSIONERS It No. ti ACTION AGENDA ITEM! ABSTRACT MEETING DATE October 6, 1986 • Subject: APPOINTMENTS I Department: BOARD OF COIMISSIONERS Public Hearing: Yes X no II I Attachments: Information Contact: Beverly A. Blythe Under Separate Cover Phone Numbers: 732-8181, 968-4501, 227-0231 PURPOSE: To maintain membership at effective levels on Commissioners' appointed Boards. The following vacancies are announced for the first time for information only: B-10 - NURSING HOME COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE - 1 vacancy due to an expiration of term for Lynn Bechard. She does desire to be reappointed and is eligible. C-8 - ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD - 1 vacancy due to the resignation of Steve K izer. The following vacancies are announced together with the indication of the status of securing candidates for possible appointment consideration. A-4 - COMMISSION FOR WOMEN - 2 vacancies - 2 resumes are submitted for consideration. A-12 - PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL - 3 vacancies; Dr. Lotchin and Mr. Nach desire to be reappointed and are eligible. A-13 - RECREATION AND PARKS ADVISORY COUNCIL- 2 vacancies - no recommendation has been received. A-14-SECONDARY( ROAD IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE - 1 vacancy; one resume is submitted for consideration. B-14 - ARTS COMMISSION - 1 vacancy; no recommendation has been received. C-3 - CHAPEL HILL BOARD QF ADJUSTMENT- 1 vacancy for an alternate. Two resumes are submitted for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: As the Board decides. le 181 ORANGE COUNTY Action BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Item No. ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT MEETING DATE October 6, 1986 Sub3ect: MINUTES I _ Department: BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS f 1 Public Hearing: Yes I no 1I Attachments: Information Contact: Beverly A. Blythe Under Separate Cover Phone Numbers: 132-8181, 968-4501, 2270231 PURPOSE: To correct and/or approve the minutes as submitted for consideration: September 16, 1986 - Regular Meeting and Continued Joint Meeting NEED: Approval so the minutes maybe entered into the official minute book in the Clerk's office. RECOMMENDATION: As the Board decides. - • ADDED ITEM . ORANGE COUNTY Action Agenda BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Item No. et72, ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT MEETING DATE October 6, 1986 Subject: Teen Networking Team - Department: BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Public Hearing: Yes X no Attachments: Information Contact: Shirley Marshall None Phone Numbers: 732-8181, 968-1+501, 227-0231 PURPOSE: To hear a presentation and receive a request from TNT (Teen Networking Team) NEED: Since April representatives of the. Board of Commissioners, the Health Board and the Social Services Board have been meeting regularly with concerned citizens and representatives of relevant agency Boards and staff, as well as Department Heads and Supervisors including Economic Development, Recreation and Parks, Health and Agricultural Extension to join forces and to explore ways in which existing Orange County agencies can better serve the occupation-oriented and recreational needs of teens in order to postpone young parenthood, encourage teens to finish their education and prepare teens for and help them find suitable and satisfying employ- ment. A teen project has emerged as a part of this effort which is to be presented to the Board for their encouragement and fiscal support. RECOMMENDATION: To fund the small request, not only to support the project itself but to support the County Staff in the many departments who have given generously of their personal time to support a massive interdepartmental, inter-agency coordination effort. i J. ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 106 EAST MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGH, N. C. 27278 MOSES CAREY ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS HEN LLOYD mmawtE.!LABEH°,_L INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM NORMAN WALKER 8609-307 DON WTLLHOIT TO: Tom Ward Chris Nutter FROM: Beverly A. Blythe SUBJECT: Agenda Item and Resolution DATE: September 23 , 1986 Shirley Marshall requested we type and send the attached two copies to you. If you have any corr ctions, please let me know. The information is n computer and can easily be revised and reprinte 4 Itir i -.:, Ak, ;:.,. i__ 1.4_ ..p.14, ,--1„. 2.4, wr � ru � ,. �, ._, ,x�, 4F*I ,.3 _ r16:1' ::. =. :,/4.r-_ .._._ .7 .. . ":,,+,4 v. fl`tom"t'-.--,... , TO: DSS Board FROM: Chris Nutter DATE: September 22, 1986 RE: Agenda Item B Lowerincr the black teen precnancy rate in Orange County At an April meeting (a spinoff from our DSS Adolescent Parenting Program Advisory Committee) , a group (mostly black) expressed the desire to work with teens in order to help them postpone pregnancy, complete their education and to find suitable employment. The original goal was stated as: "to explore ways in which existing Orange County agencies can better serve the recreational needs of teens and the occu- pation-oriented needs of teens. " This was later expanded to include (1) the need for teens to learn parenting skills, to improve parent-teen and teen-peer relationship, and (2) to help teens fill other needs yet to be expressed and defined by the teens themselves. One strong resource and need this group felt was the presence of some appropriate young black role models working with the teens in the county. The problem: Ervin Taylor, our black male 4-H agent, has retired from over ten years of work with Agriculture Ex- tension. He worked among and with all young people in our county. As a role model, he probably helped in the broad area of black teen pregnancy prevention. He needs to be replaced as soon as possible with a person like himself. Background: Our board has a commitment to lower the birthrate among Orange County teens. Suggested action: For the DSS Board as a whole or as individuals to write Dr. Hugh Liner at NCSU who is the appropriate contact for hiring a replacement for Erwin. Copies might be sent to Don Willhoit and the County Manager. Dr. Hugh Liner Don Willhoit Box 7604 NCSU 203 Lexington Road Raleigh, NC 27695 Chapel Hill, NC 27514 IR RESOLUTION WHEREAS Ervin Taylor has recently retired after ten years as 4-H agent, and WHEREAS Ervin Taylor has worked among and with all young people in the County, and WHEREAS Ervin Taylor has served as a role model for both black and white male youths, and WHEREAS the citizens of Orange County who have worked closely with Ervin Taylor, and WHEREAS the citizens of Orange County who have had children grow and flourish under his leadership, and WHEREAS the Orange County Social Services Board recognizes the source of support to our clients Ervin Taylor has been in the role of model, and WHEREAS a majority of members of the Orange County Social Services Board have been since early spring in- volved with representatives of the Board of Comm- issioners and the Health Board meeting regularly with concerned citizens and representatives of relevant agency boards and staff, as well as department heads and supervisors, including Economic Development, Recreation and Parks, Health and Agricultural Extension to join forces and to explore ways in which existing Orange County agencies can better serve the occupation-oriented and recreational needs of teens in order to postpone young parenthood, encourage teens to finish their education and prepare teens for and help them find suitable and satisfying employment, THEREFORE The Orange County Social Services Board hereby RESOLVES to request the Agricultural Extension Agency and the Orange County Board of Commissioners under their Memorandum of Understanding to: 1. employ a replacement for Ervin Taylor who matches Ervin Taylor's special qualifications as exactly as possible, and 2. advertise the vacancy and make the replacement as soon as possible. . , , . fig/ rAIYVL4 r ! p ORANGE COUNTY Action Agenda BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS it No. ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT MEETING DATE 47 '' -- Subject: , 7-Ac r Department: BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Public Hearing: Yes X no Attachments: Information Contact: 't.�`.�� Phone Numbers: T32-8181, 968-4501, 227-0231 • • •-1:: --k-5 a 7�4 {��..- -■&P Cet.-4-^r ‘ yArT (T.Z.1201 4/e-fier,K7e,61...., ) it t 110 --) at,,:j C61-4):". A/ • („5,...a,7),4 ..40-mip 04, r qty -'' iaL, L.,14.‘40.1 - l , 1 104 ir. "- K7,4_,,,,,„,r .., , i , '4 1 0 /, A Ly-e.€(1 -1,4„, p, 71-34.4k-r-441.4.4L. a-s-igi/ e' , p--•0-;_s• gC..* ) - "- / ,24014-01-t--;., /9-14,f-/-Z-4-4. " A g 1 �� �11 C�l { �'7 Cole-44.- ‘)a."22----‘ 76 ir, , , jor i ,c17-tpour z.L.,: 4.---4_,_:A Fr 71,,,;i7 ._ `zet,te ,,„_.„......„ _,..„ L +5 ;Ai - . ' -neZ. 66t4 P44-'4- RECOMMENDATION: 7-0 t 4i. 12"-/-Ari / i 04--e-c•ty --lii-1.27t '. `7 /° 49•C 5/0"e-1-7 r Gss4r ,. 4144-,1"14.6L4104-0%-e '' Tfirli- V21141 t Zi., ■0144E-f,t4;"f,e4 46/049,044----71 , al/ .4.-y-41- 64'141A4t_eo,cm7L • aw"ei 4/ P 4-4Q "/A- .7444-4- 7-4-1--fi --A--frie/ .rel- --/-7.:-.- 32: . . , 0 / 4.--za, . 0-4, .g.e44-i-kr:,i.td., ..-1,- . . 4 5r 1__ --k- or, . I f dl -art.e.01 -a-P--e"-i-f------r-----c-r/- / .., ,_..,42 frirnt . C.---119 AurbA71-, k _ - ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 106 EAST MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGI-1, N. C. 27278 • MOSES CAREY October 22, 1986 . . BEN LLOYD SFDRLEY E.MARSHALL NORMAN WALKER DON WIL HO=T • • Ms. Sarah Williamson, Clerk Town of Carrboro 301 West Main Street Carrboro, NC 27510 Dear Sarah: Attached is a copy of the deed for the drainage easement as approved by the Board of Commissioners at their meeting held on October 6, 1986 Mr. Harris called my office ar� i requested a copy of this easement. Will you please forward a copy tads office. Thank yu, 1- �"__ .'.lie_+ •~—--1 -—- - - . ;_--=c-. _.._. ...._ ' ik.�•;;.:., . Pit? 40(4....i"'L.['� _ z t$_...�,' '� tip"•°.. = rat' i .��« * Beverly, >BL ham., ,�n p /bab File Attachment . • I L 1 1 PIN: 9778-97-5883 Prepared by and return to: TM#: 7.93.F.2 Jeffrey N. Mason Faison, Brown, Fletcher & Brough. Post Office Box 1210 Chapel Hill, N.C. 27514 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ORANGE COUNTY DEED OF DRAINAGE EASEMENT THIS DEED, made this the 4:7i( day of QcJDder , 1986, by and between ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, a North Carolina Body Politic, party of the first part, and the TOWN OF CARRBORO, a municipal corporation,. 301 West Main Street, Carrboro, Orange County, State of North. Carolina 27510, party of the second part: W I T N E SS S E T H: WHEREAS, the party of the first part is the owner of certain property located within the Town of Carrboro in the Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, State of North Carolina, which lands are more particularly described in a deed recorded in Book 270, Page 482, of the Orange County Registry; and WHEREAS, the party of the second part desires to acquire drainage easements over, across, and under a portion of said lands for the purpose of constructing and . maintaining said (3) North 83002 '03" East a distance of 14.32 feet, along Hill(Lloyd) Street to the point and place of BEGINNING, all as shown on that certain "Drainage Easement Map" by the John R. McAdams Company, Inc. , dated April 18, 1986. TRACT TWO: BEING fifteen feet (15' ) on both sides of the centerline of the drainage ditch presently located on the aforementioned property. The said easement is granted for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a drainage way or drainage ditch, together with the right to cut and remove such trees, growth, and other natural or man made obstructions in, upon and along said drainage easement as may interfere with the installation, laying, upkeep and maintenance of said drainage easement. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid rights, privileges and easements unto the party of the second part, and its successors and assigns, for its use and enjoyment forever, so that neither the party of the first part nor any other persons claiming through the said party of the first part, will, nor may hereafter claim or demand any right or title to the rights, privileges and easements herein, but the party of the first part shall by these presents be excluded and forever barred. (3) North 83002 '03" East a distance of 14.32 feet, along Hill (Lloyd) Street to the point and place of BEGINNING, all as shown on that certain "Drainage Easement Map" by the John R. McAdams Company, Inc. , dated April 18, 1986. TRACT TWO: BEING fifteen feet (15 ' ) on both sides of the centerline of the drainage ditch presently located on the aforementioned property. The said easement is granted for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a. drainage way or drainage ditch, together with the right to cut and remove such trees, growth, and other natural or man made obstructions in, upon and along said drainage easement as may interfere with the installation, laying, upkeep and maintenance of said drainage easement. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid rights, privileges and easements unto the party of the second part, and its successors and assigns, for its use and enjoyment forever, so that neither the party of the first part nor any other persons claiming through the said party of the first part, will nor may hereafter claim or demand any right or title to the rights, privileges and easements herein, but the party of the first part shall by these presents be excluded and forever barred. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the said party of the first part has caused this easement to be signed by its duly authorized parties and its seal to be hereunto affixed by authority of its Board of Commissioners the day and year first above written. THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS BY: a,, Chairman (SEAL) ATTEST: gl=ahe B and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF I, Sy lvi a T. Clements , a Notary Public of the County and State aforesaid, certify that Bever! BI , personnally appeared before me this day and ac nowle ge the execution of the foregoing instrument by Don lA llhoit Chairman of the Orange County Board of Commissioners, an3 the seal was affixed hereto by authority of the vote and approval of the Orange County Board of Commissioners, as attested by herself as Clerk of the Board. Witness my hand and notarial seal this 6th day of October , 1986. , �pgSYSZar.� No ary • • P �9f rg ►yam. My Commission expires: December 10, 1990 1;14�a pY `f' 39N28 ` 62.‘ PUBLIt 3s CO`i • 0‘te g,nallatwA HHAZENANDSA1ER, P.c. \ CONSULTING ENGINEERS October 1, 1986 Mr. Kenneth R. Thompson County Manager 106 East Margaret Lane Hillsborough, NC 27278 Re: Contract Proposal Study and Evaluation of Additional. Water Supply Development in Orange County Dear Mr. Thompson: Hazen and Sawyer is pleased to submit herewith our contract proposal for a water supply development feasibility study for the County of Orange. Per our conversation, we have updated the scope of services contained in our May 198.3 proposal as well as our estimate of related fees. As we understand your thoughts, this study would bring together previous reports by other engineers in the State of North Carolina and in general encompass the following: - Determine the feasibility and cost of constructing a new reservoir in the Upper Eno River Basin. At a minimum, consideration would be given to the Seven Mile Creek site and expansion of the existing Corporation Lake. - Determine the feasibility of utilizing Jordan Lake as an alternative to construction of a new reservoir including the possibility for creation of a regional system with costs and benefits shared by the benefactors. - Consider alternative methods of financing the proposed construction including a preliminary assessment of user fees. We have presented our scope of services (expanded from the May 1983 proposal) and fee estimates in our proposed engineering agreement as a matter of convenience and expedience (draft copy enclosed for your review and comments) . We have estimated that Phase 1 of the proposed study will take approximately six months; however, this can be adjusted based on your concern for study completion. 4300 GLENWOOD AVENUE•P.O.BOX 30428•RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA 27622.(919)782-8333 OFFICES IN NEW YORK RALEIGH;AND HOLLYWOOD.FLOCROA Mr. Kenneth R. Thompson October 1, 1986 Page 2 We appreciate your consideration of Hazen and. Sawyer for this most important study, and we look forward to the opportunity of working with you and your staff towards the successful implementation of a much needed water supply source. After you have had a chance to review the enclosed draft contract, we would be happy to discuss it in detail with you at your convenience_ Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, HAZEN AND SAWYER. P.C. Donald L. ordel.l, P.E. Associate DLC/jhl Enclosures r / 7� AGREEMENT for APPRAISAL SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACQUISITION OF LAND between - COUNTY OF ORANGE, NORTH. CAROLINA and KATHLEEN K.- BUCK, APPRAISER ROUTE 5, BOX 90 CHAPEL HILL, N.C. ARTICLES OF AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of 19 by and between the County of Orange, North Carolina (herein called the "COUNTY") and Kathleen K. Buck, Appraiser, North Carolina (herein called the "APPRAISER") . W I T N E S S E T H I IN THAT WHEREAS, the COUNTY is considering making sewer improvements in the Efland Community; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY in implementing this project pro- poses to secure sewer easements in the Efland Community (herein called the "Project Area") and desires that the APPRAISER furnish an appraisal of certain properties; and WHEREAS, the APPRAISER represents that he/she is author- ized and qualified to do such work and is familiar with recognized appraisal practices, with standards required for determining values, particularly in eminent domain proceed- ings, with negotiation procedures in the acquisition of real property, and has the ability to complete the work in a successful and timely manner; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY has likewise indicated its desire to engage the APPRAISER to render professional services and assistance in connection therewith; and NOW, THEREFORE, the COUNTY and the APPRAISER, in consi- deration of these premises and of the mutual convenants herein set forth, do mutually agree as follows: SECTION I PROPERTY TO BE APPRAISED A description of the real property to be appraised, including an identification of any interest in the real property to be specifically excluded from appraisal, are set forth in the attached Exhibit A. A separate appraisal is to be furnished for each "parcel. " The term "parcel" means any tract or contiguous tracts of land in the same ownership, whether any such tract consists of one or more platted lots. or a fractional part of a lot. An easement or other separately held interest in two or more parcels shall be considered to be a separate parcel for appraisal purposes and an exception to the title to the parcels so encumbered. An easement in a parcel that- is appurtenant to another parcel to be acquired by the COUNTY shall be considered to be part of _ - - LI N DY PEN DERG RASS Sheriff of Orange County . Hillsborough, North Carolina, 27278 Office Phone: Hillsborough 732-2431 October 2, 1986 Chapel Hill 942-6300 • • Residence Phone: 929-5535 • TO: Jane Atwater FROM: Sheriff Pendergrass RE: Calls for Service to Mobile Home Courts December 2, 1982 - DEcember 31, 1982: 30 calls recorded January 1, 1983 -- DEcember 31, 1983: 10;168 total calls for service recorded, 545 for Mobile Home Courts . 5.35 per cent of all calls January 1, 1984 - December 31, 1984: 10,888 total calls for service recorded, . 810 for Mobile Home. Courts . 7..4 Per cent of all calls January 1, 1985 -- December 31, 1985: . 14,404 total calls for service recorded: 851 for Mobile Home Courts 5.9 per cent of all calls January 1, 1986 - September 16, 1986: 12,263 calls for 9 months 498 for'Mobile Home Courts 4.0 per cent of all calls Jane the calls for service cover every thing we respond to. If I can be of further help, please call upon me. Interesting: total 47,723 - Orange County - Mobile Homes 2,734=5.7%_ b VI)ECEIVE b Io-2-& rit't 11 t mss: u.. , State of North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development Raleigh Regional Office James G. Martin, Governor DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary May 9, 1986 Mr. Allen E. Turner CERTIFIED MAIL 5001 Raintree Rd. RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Durham. NC 27712 _ SUBJECT: Notice of Non-compliance Unlawful Discharge Turner Trucking Company Orange minty' Dear Mr. Turner: . . ' On May 5, 1986, Mr. Jack Floyd of the Raleigh Regional Office visited the subject facility in reference to a complaint of the discharge of oil and washwater. There was visible evidence of wastewater pooling along the property with a degree of petroleum noted in the washwater. At the tine of inspection, several vehicles were being washed. Based on the visible evidence of f -washweter being discharged onto the land and possibly washing into the ' surface waters of the State, this facility is in non-compliance iarice with the - following North Carolina General Statutes: 143-215.1 - discharge without permit -. 143-215.83 - discharge of oil You are hereby requested to cease immediately all discharge of oil and washwater which drains into or is likely to reach the surface testers of the . State. In order to c oat i ue present i`ainGSS practices, a collection Sy5tc 'r must be installed to prevent any further discharges. Such collection systems must be permitted by this Division. You are requested to respond in writing within fifteen (15) days of receipt of this letter stating your intentions to correct this situation. If you have any questions, please call Mr. Floyd at 919/733-2314. • Sincerely, �\ W . )L-.1f.e. : R.W. Van Tilburg Regional Supervisor V RWVT/JF/j f ,r cc: Jack Floyd F - Orange County Health Dept. 3800 Barrett Drive, P.Q Box 27687, Raleigh, NC.27611-7687•Telephone 919.7332314 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer ' r No. 573 [M ID N/A SERVICE CONTRACT This contract, made and entered into this 6th day of October 19 86 , by and between the Orange-Person-Chatham Mental Health Center and • Orange County Personnel That for the purpose and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the Orange-Person-Chatham Mental Health Center hereby contracts for the service of training for specialized foster parenting accept the terms of such a contract. and they First: The service to be performed by Orange County Trainer is as follows: Training, including 8 two-hour -sessions plus preparation and coordination time, for prospective foster parents. Second: This contract shall begin on the 6th day of October 19 86 ,. and unless sooner terminated by mutual consent or as hereinafter shall exist and continue until the 20th day of November P86 vided, provided that either party shall have the right to terminate this contract for r service upon two weeks (14 days) notice in writing to the other party. It is expected that the contractee will conduct his/her duties in a manner consistent with the mission of the OPC Mental Health Center as a human service organization. Violations of the terms of this contract shall be grounds for immediate termination of the contract by the contractor. Third: The Orange--Person-Chatham Mental Health Center agrees to pay the sum of $20.00 per hr. as full compensation for the services of for a maximum of 52 hours or $1040.00 trainer upon receipt of an invoice which indicates the amount of monies owed to the con- tractee for services rendered. The invoice whould be sent by the. 5th working day of each month after services are rendered to assure payment by the 15th of the month. If the bill for service comes to the office after the 5th of the month, the contractee will receive payment by the 30th of the month. It is understood that work time called for in this contract will not exceed sixteen (16) hours per week. It is further understood that the Orange-Person-Chatham Mental Health Center assumes no medical, professional, or automobile liability insurance either for the con- tractee or the client served. • W / 1,= : �J�`2 c_r r/ 56-600032 Contraetee or uthorized Agency Representative / 56-6000327 • Ss# / Federal employer YD # Address: 106 E. Margaret Lane - Hillsborough, �d C 27278 lUIS EVSTRUMENT HAS BEEN PREAUOI'TED IN THE MANNER BE:OARED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT NT BUDGET AND MI/ � FISCAL.CONTROL ACT. William F. Baxter, Jr.. Ira Director, ��� ector, OPC Mental Health Center /WRAP 7 FINANCE OFFICER • _ Date '' r 1 ADDENDUM TO CONTRACT # 573 OPC agrees to pay a lump sum of $1040.00 in advance to Orange County for a maximum of 52 hours of trainer time (including preparation, coordination, training sessions and transportation) . It is understood and agreed that all unused monies will be reimbursed to OPC upon the termination of this contract. . • .4 W 10/21/86 Contractee Date Orange County -------- _._ ------- 0111 ' Will am F. Baxte , Area Director Date . OPC Men al H alth Center 21..1Aree# 7 fDj.7art Orange County Department of Finance ! , Date THIS INSTRUMENT HAS BEER pREAUDITEI IN THE MANNER BEWARE° BY THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BUDGET AND FISCAL CONTROL ACT. -7 _- DA FINANCE GF.FICER - J r PROCLAMATION NATIONAL EMPLOY THE HANDICAPPED WEEK WHEREAS, physically and mentally disabled people have been tireless in seeking out employment opportunities and in overcoming vocational, economic, educational and additional barriers; and WHEREAS, disabled people have demonstrated to their employers and their community high standards of performance and dedication to their professions; and WHEREAS, disabled people aspire to equality in the work force, self-direction and self-determination in their lifestyle; and WHEREAS, employers, both public and private, can and do readily testify to the credentials and value of disabled employees; and WHEREAS, everyone has the right to employment at the highest levels of which they are capable and this right is not to be abridged by reason of physical or mental disability; and WHEREAS, despite past and present efforts of employers to hire people with disabilities, the unemployment level of disabled people continues to be unnecessarily high; NOW, THEREFORE, the Orange County Board of Commissioners do hereby proclaim the week of October 5-11, 1986 as NATIONAL EMPLOY THE HANDICAPPED WEEK in Orange County and urge public and private employers to take this opportunity to determine how the employment skills and the employment needs of disabled persons can best be utilized to further the public/private good. V _ Don Willhoit, Chair County of Orange October 6, 1986 S E A L CHANGE Distribution 10: ORDER OWNER ARCI-111 I:cT AEA DOCUMENT C701 CONTRACTOR a FIELD ❑ OTHER ❑ PROJECT: Carr Building Renovation CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 1 • tname, address) Corbin St. Hillsborough, NC INITIATION DATE: 9-29-86 TO (Contractor): ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 5568 D.W. .Ward Construction Co. CONTRACT FOR: General Construction P.O. Box 15157 Durham, NC 27704 J CONTRACT DATE:AUgUSt 13, 1986 You are directed to make the following changes in This Contract: Item One Reduce thickness of metal roof to 26 gauge Credit $7,995.00 Item Two Remove section of terrazzo floor topping Extra 334.00 Resultant Change Order Amount Credit $7,661.00 N..1 %,ili(I until•ignerl by tenth 11w Ot)nor and Arching". ~4:11,11111'1. ni the ("nnlratUn- indicate. hi% agroonu•nl hr•row•ith, inducting any a(Ijuslinonl in the(tinlracl Sum cur ('nnlra(I limo.. [1w original (Contract Sum) f,(i(t(rig(d(/cil/dtkii$W,414/t(1✓was $ $221,856.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders $ -0- The (Contract Sum) (d(aintidcit�✓aidi✓ diti4 prior to this Change Order was $ 221,856. 1he iC( nIract Sum)Id.i Urt(dtlidkaVaiar✓iA✓(✓y()/a•iIl be /i,'rhA,Wi/(decreased)Atkigh6✓ii(✓di by this Change Order $ 7,661. the new (Contract Suni)/1i/,,4-,r1✓t✓r✓cf$)A/(i✓i✓y4yi,C//ttf including this Change Order will he $ 214,195. The Contract Time will be ✓9(a0,h!/fc✓ge/4cC4( (unchanged) by ( -0- ) Days. The Dale of Substantial Completion as of the date of Ihi; Change Order therefore is February 27, 1987 • Authorized: CHR Associates, PA D.W. Ward Construction Co. County of Or. ge•A,I r port Road ia COR uanmi n Dri - OWNER 1()1; F_ Mar rat Lana Addict,.n••• Arl(Iro.s Address Chapel Hill, NC 27514 Durham, NC 27704 Hill rough, NC 27278 I I):\IL I)\IF DATE AIA DOCUMENT G701 • (.I IAN(;r. ORI)I R • AiFlI I•IT11 COI Ill IN • : l.r 1478 1111 WI KR AN IN%I!11111. OF AR( II Ire rs, 17 I i NI\V YOI R.\\T.,NAY..5V\tiI11N(;ION, D.C. 411111f. G701—1978 • CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA AND HAZEN AND SAWYER, P. C. WATER SUPPLY DEVELOPMENT STUDY THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of 1986 by and between The COUNTY OF ORANGE , a municipal corporation of the State of North Carolina , with offices at 106 East Margaret Lane , Hillsborough , North Carolina 27278 , hereinafter called the OWNER; and HAZEN AND SAWYER, P . C . , a professional corporation , with offices at 730 Broadway , New York , New York 10003 and 4300 Glenwood Avenue , Raleigh , North Carolina 27612 , hereinafter called the ENGINEERS; WHEREAS , the OWNER desires to evaluate the most economical alternative for developing an additional water supply to serve the County; and WHEREAS , the OWNER desires to engage the ENGINEERS to provide the professional engineering services for studies and evaluations listed in Article I ; Page 1 of 11 WITNESSETH , that the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows : ARTICLE I - DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED The engineering services to be performed under this Agreement can generally be divided into two phases . The first phase will consist of a feasibility study to determine the most appropriate alternative for meeting the long-term water supply needs of Orange County . The second phase will consist of developing additional site specific engineering and cost data for the alternative recommended during Phase 1 . Specific tasks to be performed during each phase are as follows : Phase 1 1 . Population and water use projections will be developed for a planning period of 30 to 40 years . Population and water use projections developed by other governmental agencies will be obtained and reviewed to establish a complete data base for determining future water needs . 2 . Utilizing existing sources , data will be collected concerning the existing land- use features , historic structures and sites , geology , soils , climatology , socioeconomic characteristics , water and biological resources , and point and non - point sources of pollution . 3 . Using existing topographic information , potential reservoir sites in the upper Eno basin will be Page 2 of 11 identified and evaluated . At a minimum, alternatives selected for study will include the Seven Mile Creek site and expansion of Corporation Lake . Evaluation criteria will include the following : a . Topographic and geophysical characteristics of the site. b. Required storage volume based on low flow hydrologic calculations . c. Land and building acquisitions and required relocations of highways and roads . d . Drainage area location and characteristics as related to present and expected future water quality and suitability for use as a public water supply. 4. The feasibility of utilizing raw water from Jordan Lake in lieu of constructing a new reservoir will be evaluated . Consideration will be given to the advantages of a water treatment plant facility located near the lake intake source . Evaluation criteria will include availability of suitable intake site ( s ) , pipeline routings , treatability and water quality, and the feasibility of regional utilization . 5 . A preliminary feasibility assessment will be made for each alternative identified . For those alternatives determined feasible , the following information will be developed : Page 3 of 11 a . Preliminary construction layouts will be prepared for the purposes of establishing the nature and quantity of work required . b . Estimates of land area needs and relocations will be developed to the extent possible based on available information . c. Preliminary estimates of spillway requirements will be developed based on current North Carolina regulations , if applicable . d . Preliminary cost estimates will be developed for construction , including land acquisition and estimated annual operation and maintenance expenses . e. A preliminary assessment of expected environmental and socioeconomic impacts will be made . 6. Alternate means of financing the recommended project will be considered , including creation of special tax districts and alternate bond financing . Preliminary estimates of user fees will be prepared for project benefactors . 7 . A preliminary report will be prepared covering all of the aspects of the feasibility study . The report discussion will include consideration of available methods for financing, steps and procedures involved in implementing the recommended construction program . This report will be submitted to the County Page 4 of 11 Commissioners for comment and concurrence in the recommended alternative prior to proceeding to Phase 2 of the study. Phase 2 Phase 2 of the study will not be undertaken until authorized by the County . This phase of the work will consist of developing additional site specific engineering and cost information for the recommended alternative . Additional preliminary engineering studies will be undertaken to refine project concepts with emphasis given to more accurately defining the nature and scope of the required construction and the associated construction cost . Specific tasks to be performed include the following : 1 . Aerial topographic mapping of the recommended dam site , if applicable . 2 . A geological site reconnaissance and limited subsurface investigation to determine the geophysical characteristics of the site . 3 . Preparation of more detailed preliminary site layouts and construction cost estimates . 4 . A final report will be prepared summarizing the results of the additional studies performed during Phase 2 . ARTICLE II SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED The engineering services to be performed under this Agreement are divided into two parts as follows : Page 5 of 11 A. Phase 1 Phase 1 of the study shall be as described in Article I of this Agreement . Phase 1 will include preparation of a preliminary report describing the evaluations made during the course of the study and recommending the most appropriate alternative for meeting the long-term water supply needs of Orange County . Monthly meetings with the Water Supply Advisory Committee are included during this phase . B . Phase 2 Phase 2 of the study will not be undertaken until authorized by the OWNER . The purpose of this portion of the study will be to develop more detailed engineering and cost information for the recommended alterative . Specific tasks to be performed shall be as described in Article I of this Agreement . ARTICLE III - SCHEDULE The work to be performed and the services to be rendered under each part of this Agreement shall commence as directed by the OWNER . The study described under Article II , Part A shall be completed within approximately six ( 6 ) months following authorization to proceed by the OWNER . The additional engineering evaluations described in Article II , Part B will be completed in approximately three ( 3 ) months following authorization to proceed by the OWNER. Page 6 of 11 ARTICLE IV - COMPENSATION For the engineering services described in Article II , individual or combined cost ceilings shall be established as indicated below . Within these cost ceilings the ENGINEERS shall be compensated as follows : ( 1 ) Each hour of service rendered as a direct charge to this Contract shall be billed at payroll costs times the multipler indicated for each service . Payroll costs include base salary , vacations , sick leave , holidays , payroll taxes and insurance and pension plan . (2 ) Mileage costs directly chargeable to this project will be billed at the ENGINEERS ' standard employee reimbursement rate of 21 cents per mile . Other travel expenses shall be billed at actual cost . ( 3 ) Work done by others on a subcontract basis shall be billed at actual cost to the ENGINEERS . Subcontract work will not start until approved by the OWNER. BASIS OF COMPENSATION Payroll Cost Service Multiplier Cost Ceiling Article IIA - Phase 1 2 . 15 $40,000 Article IIB - Phase 2 2 . 15 $20,000 ARTICLE V - PAYMENT Partial payment shall be made to the ENGINEERS monthly as work progresses on the basis of hours charged to the job during the previous month by principals and employees of the ENGINEERS, Page 7 of 11 multiplied by the payroll cost and designated multiplier , plus costs for mileage , travel , and other allowable expenses during the previous month as set forth in Article IV of this Agreement . The ENGINEERS shall submit monthly statements requesting payment , supplemented or accompanied by such supporting data as may be required by the OWNER . The OWNER shall act upon the ENGINEERS ' requests for payment within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt . ARTICLE VI - PERSONNEL AND FACILITIES The ENGINEERS hereby state that they now have or will secure at their expense , including subcontractors , all personnel and facilities required to perform the services set forth under this Agreement . All personnel assigned to work under this Contract shall be fully qualified . Services shall be provided in accordance with national , state, and local statutes , ordinances , codes and regulations , and with accepted engineering practices . The ENGINEERS may subcontract certain portions of the work included under this Agreement including , but not limited to , surveys , geotechnical and special testing services . Subcontractor payment shall be in accordance with Article IV . ARTICLE VII - SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE OWNER It is agreed and understood that certain assistance will be furnished by the OWNER, such as the following : 1. Assist the ENGINEERS by placing at their disposal all available information pertinent to the project , including previous reports , etc . Page 8 of 11 2 . Furnish to the ENGINEERS , as required for performance of their services , existing site s e information such as property boundaries , easements , rights-of-way and deed restrictions , etc . 3 . Obtain access for the ENGINEERS to enter upon public and private property as required for performance of services described herein . 4 . Render in a reasonable time , in writing , as requested by the ENGINEER, responses to questions or requests made by the ENGINEER that may be necessary to complete portions of the work . 5 . Give prompt written notice to the ENGINEERS whenever the OWNER observe or are advised of any deficiencies or changed circumstances in this project . This shall not however reduce the responsibility of the ENGINEERS to perform these duties in a competent and professional manner and will not relieve the ENGINEER of any liability for his design . 6 . Furnish the ENGINEERS in a timely manner with copies of pertinent correspondence relating to this project which would not otherwise have been delivered to the ENGINEERS. ARTICLE VIII - TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT If, through any cause, the ENGINEER shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner his obligations under this Contract , or if ENGINEERS shall violate any of the stipulations of this Page 9 of 11 Contract , the OWNER shall thereupon have the right to terminate this Contract by giving written notice to the ENGINEERS of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof. In such event , all finished or unfinished documents , data , studies , and reports prepared by the ENGINEERS under this Agreement shall become the OWNER ' S property . The payment to the ENGINEERS will be negotiated based on the amount of satisfactory work completed at the time of termination . ARTICLE IX - ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENT Neither the ENGINEERS nor the OWNER shall transfer or assign this Agreement to any third party or parties without the written permission of the other . ARTICLE X - APPLICABLE LAW This Agreement , including , but not by way of limiting the interpretation thereof and the rights and remedies of the parties thereunder , shall be governed by the laws of the State of North Carolina . Except as this Agreement otherwise provides , all claims , counterclaims , disputes and other matters in question between the OWNER and the ENGINEERS arising out of , or relating to this Contract or the breach of it , will be decided by resort to the court of competent jurisdiction within the State of North Carolina unless the parties hereto mutually agree to submit any such dispute for resolution by Arbitration . In the event of any legal controversy requiring the services of the ENGINEERS in providing expert testimony in connection with Page 10 of 11 the project , all costs involved with such testimony and preparation thereof shall be negotiated . ARTICLE XI - ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement states the entire agreement between the parties and shall not be modified except in writing signed by authorized representatives of both parties . IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year above written . COUNTY OF ORANGE HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA BY : non Witihoit, Chair Board of County Commissioners HAZEN AND SAWYER, P. C. BY : Witness Gordon C. Ruggles Vice President This document has been preaudited in the manner required by the Local Government and Fiscal Control Act . Page 11 of 11 AGREEMENT for APPRAISAL SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACQUISITION OF LAND between COUNTY OF ORANGE, NORTH CAROLINA and KATHLEEN K. BUCK, APPRAISER ROUTE 5, BOX 90 CHAPEL HILL, N.C. ARTICLES OF AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this 3rd , day of November 19 86 by and between the County of Orange, North Carolina (herein called the "COUNTY") and Kathleen K. Buck, Appraiser, North Carolina (herein called the "APPRAISER") . W I T N E S S E T H: THAT WHEREAS, the COUNTY is considering making sewer improvements in the Efland Community; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY in implementing this project pro- poses to secure sewer easements in the Efland Community (herein called the "Project Area") and desires that the APPRAISER furnish an appraisal of certain properties; and WHEREAS, the APPRAISER represents that he/she is author- ized and qualified to do such work and is familiar with recognized appraisal practices, with standards required for determining values, particularly in eminent domain proceed- ings, with negotiation procedures in the acquisition of real property, and has the ability to complete the work in a successful and timely manner; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY has likewise indicated its desire to engage the APPRAISER to render professional services and assistance in connection therewith; and NOW, THEREFORE, the COUNTY and the APPRAISER, in consi- deration of. these premises and of the mutual convenants herein set forth, do mutually agree as follows: SECTION I PROPERTY TO BE APPRAISED A description of the real property to be appraised, including an identification of any interest in the real property to be specifically excluded from appraisal, are set forth in the attached Exhibit A. A separate appraisal is to be furnished for each "parcel. " The term "parcel" means any tract or contiguous tracts of land in the same ownership, whether any such tract consists of one or more platted lots or a fractional part of a lot. An easement or other separately held interest in two or more parcels shall be considered to be a separate parcel for appraisal purposes and an exception to the title to the parcels so encumbered. An easement in a parcel that is appurtenant to another parcel to be acquired by the COUNTY shall be considered to be part of such other parcel and an exception to the title of the parcel encumbered. ) Each parcel shall be considered to include all right, title, and interest of the owner in or to any adjacent or abutting streets, alleys, or other public rights-of-way. SECTION II PURPOSE AND BASIS OF VALUATIONS 1. Purpose of Significance of Appraisals. The appraisals to be furnished under this agreement are required. by the COUNTY for its guidance in making fair and impartial determinations of possible damages and the just compensation to be offered to each property owner. The APPRAISER shall be guided by those objectives when estimating values. Appraisal reports will be reviewed carefully by the COUNTY. Accord- ingly, the text of each appraisal report must cover all matters germane to the required valuation findings and must provide a full explanation of the APPRAISER'S reasoning and his analyses of the evidences of value, so that a reviewer will be able to follow the APPRAISER'S analyses and understand how he reached his valuation conclusions. 2 . Appraisal Standards. The Appraisals under this agreement shall be based on nationally recognized appraisal standards and techniques to the extent that such principals are consistent with the concepts of value and the rules on the admissibility of evidence of value under the eminent domain law of the State. Factors relating to race, color, religion, sex or national origin, or to racial, religious and ethnic identification of neighborhoods are not relevant to the estimation of value and shall not be considered in connection with appraisals of residential real property. 3. Date of Valuation. The APPRAISER'S valuation shall be as of a date concurrent with the preparation of his report, unless the COUNTY has specified some other date of valuation. 4. Influence of Project on Property Value. In forming his opinion(s) , the APPRAISER shall disregard any decrease or increase in the fair market value of the real property to be acquired, prior to the date of valuation, caused by the project for which the property is to be acquired, or by the likelihood that the property would be acquired for such project, other than that due to physical deterioration within the reasonable control of the owner. (In the case of a partial acquisition, using the before-and- after method of valuation, the APPRAISER'S opinion of the value of the remaining not-to-be-acquired portion of the property shall reflect any increase or decrease in value attributable to the ro ect. p j ) If the determination of changes in value caused by the project is a problem, the APPRAISER'S report shall cite the ruling followed and its source and shall explain the effect of the ruling on his opinion of value. SECTION III SCOPE OF SERVICES The APPRAISER agrees to perform the following services: 1. Appraisals. Appraise each parcel comprising part of the real property described in SECTION I of this agreement and deliver to the COUNTY are (1) original and two (2) copies of the appraisal reports conforming to the provisions of this agreement. The time delivery for these appraisals shall conform to the provisions of SECTION VI. 2. Property Inspection. Personally inspect each parcel, including all buildings, structures, improvements, fixtures, appurtenances, and other elements of value thereon or belonging thereto. If the APPRAISER'S inspection or investigation discloses a sale of a portion of a parcel by an unrecorded contract of sale or otherwise, the APPRAISER shall furnish separate reports for each separately owned portion of the parcel. If another APPRAISER is also to appraise the same property, the APPRAISER may make his inspection with such other appraiser, but must otherwise prepare his appraisal report independently. 3. Valuation Data. Make such investigations, studies, and property inspections as are appropriate to enable the APPRAISER to derive sound conclusions and to prepare the appraisal reports to be furnished under this agreement. The APPRAISER shall ascertain the most recent sale of each property appraised and any other sales of such property during the last five years or in accordance preced- ing the appraisal and shall investigate any recent offer or offers of the owner to sell his property. Such sale or sales of the property appraised and all recent sales of other properties that are sufficiently comparable to the property being appraised to be considered by the APPRAISER in forming his opinion of fair market value shall be verified insofar as practical. Each such verification shall include inspecting the property and interviewing the seller, buyer, agent, or other person, who participated in the transaction, to ascer- tain the consideration paid, the terms and conditions of the sale, any special factors affecting the amount of the sale price, and the actual character and .condition of the property at the time of sale. 4. Testimony in Judicial Proceedings. Testify as an expert witness in behalf of the COUNTY in any judicial proceedings involving any property appraised under this agreement. Such services shall include such reasonable time as may be required for reinspection of the property, updating the APPRAISER'S valuation, participation in pre-trial con- ferences with counsel for the COUNTY, and testifying in the judicial proceeding. Such services shall be compensated in accordance with SECTION VI. 5. Modification of Delivered Appraisal Reports. Modify or furnish supplements to any appraisal report fur- nished hereunder, without additional cost to the COUNTY, if (a) applicable principles of law with respect to the valua- tion of the property require the modification or supplement- ing of such appraisal, (b) material omissions, inaccuracies, or defects in the appraisal report are discovered after delivery and acceptance of the report by the COUNTY, or (c) the APPRAISER receives or becomes aware of relevant addi- tional appraisal information in existence prior to the date the APPRAISER signed the report. If there is a significant delay between the date of valuation and the date of acquisi- tion of any parcel or if the property has been materially altered since the appraisal by a fire, a revised determina- tion of the boundaries or the interest to be acquired, or other cause, the APPRAISER shall, if requested by the COUNTY, furnish the COUNTY a supplementary report updating his valuation and the supporting data and analyses to a current date. The compensation for such updating of an appraisal shall be determined in accordance with any applicable provi- sions of this agreement. 6. Reservations in Owners. Furnish the COUNTY, if requested by the COUNTY the APPRAISER'S estimate of the value of any •right or interest proposed to be reserved by the owner in a property appraised by the APPRAISER, including such reservations as mineral rights, an easement for access to other property of the owner, the right to continue occupancy for an extended period after the COUNTY acquired the pro- perty, or the right to remove any building, structure, fixture or other improvement, or a part thereof, at the owner's expense and without cost to the COUNTY. The compen- sation to be paid to the APPRAISER for furnishing any such valuations, and such data and analyses as may be required to support the valuations shall be determined, as applicable, in accordance with the provisions of SECTION VI. 7. Retention of Appraisal Records. Retain a copy of each appraisal report and all notes and records germane to the appraisal for three years after delivering the appraisal report to the COUNTY or until the property is acquired by the COUNTY or its proposed acquisition of the property is aband- oned, whichever is the later. 8. Consultation with COUNTY. Advise and consult with the COUNTY and its legal counsel regarding services performed and to be performed by the APPRAISER and the real property acquisition aspects of the COUNTY plan and programs as related to the properties involved in this agreement, at such time or times as may be mutually convenient for the parties to this agreement, without additional charge to the Agency. The APPRAISER shall initiate such consultations whenever he is in doubt as to whether an element of property is real or personal property or needs legal advise on any aspect of the appraisals to be furnished under this agreement. There shall be no charge by any party for such consultations except as may be outlined in SECTION VI. SECTION IV CONTENTS OF APPRAISAL REPORTS Each appraisal report to be furnished by the APPRAISER under this agreement shall contain certain information and the APPRAISER'S conclusions and opinions, together with the data and analyses by which they were derived, as set forth below. A separate report shall be submitted for each parcel. However, if more than one parcel is to be appraised, all general data may be included in separate data volume that is referenced in the separate appraisal reports on the indivi- dual parcels. The appraisal reports on each parcel shall include the following: 1. Appraisal Summary. A cover sheet headed "Appraisal Report for the County of Orange, North Carolina that provides the following: a., Project name and number. (To be provided by County) . b. Date of report. c. Parcel number, address of the property, brief identification of the interest in the property appraised, and the name of the owner of owners. d. Date or dates of the APPRAISER'S inspection of the property. Identify any owners of a compensable interest in the property, who were not present or represented during the APPRAISER'S inspection, including identification of the interest in the property held by each such owner. e. The APPRAISER'S estimate of the fair market value of the property and the fair market value of the same interest in the land, if vacant. f. Any other fact or conclusion from the APPRAISER'S report which the COUNTY requests the APPRAISER to include on the summary page. g. The limiting conditions of the appraisal, which may include assumptions (1) that the title is good and marketable, (2) that no responsibility is assumed by the APPRAISER for legal matters, especially those affecting the title to the property, (3) that the legal description of the property and the interest therein to be appraised, furnished to the APPRAISER by the COUNTY, is correct, and (4) that no survey of the property has been made. Any other appropriate assumption or limiting condition may be added if it has been specifically approved in writing by the COUNTY. h. The certifications of the APPRAISER (1.) that he personally made a thorough inspection of the property, (2) that, to the best of his knowledge and belief, everything contained in the report is true and no relevant and important fact has been omitted, (3) that neither his employment nor his compensation is contingent on the valuation reported, and (4) that he has no past, present, or prospective interest (including that of real estate agent or broker) in the property, the parties involved, or any other interest that would conflict in any way with services performed or the making of an impartial report. i. A certification that, in the APPRAISER'S opinion, the fair market value of the property is (an amount to be stated) as of (the date of valuation deter- mined in accordance with SECTION II 3 of this agreement) . j . The signature of the APPRAISER. 2. Ownership. The name and address of the owner of the property and the name and the address, if known of any other party known or believed to hold a separate compensable interest in the property. For any party listed as holding a separate compensable interest in the property, furnish a description of the interest when providing the property delineation in accordance with SECTION IV of this agreement. 3. Property Data. Description of the property, including information pertinent to the appraisal with respect to such matters as (a) the environment and location of the property, (b) the zoning and any restrictive convenants, conditions, or servitudes affecting the available use or occupancy of the land, (c) the assessed value of the real property and the current annual real estate tax burden, (d) the use and occupancy of the property at time of appraisal, (e) the public improvements, services, and utilities serving and providing access to the property, (f) the character, topography, dimensions, and area of the land, (g) the freedom of the property from or susceptibility to special hazards, (h) the current rental and rental history of the property, if rented, (i) the estimated annual costs of ownership and for operation and maintenance of the property, and (j) a descrip- tion of the buildings, structures, fixtures, and other improvements if any, appurtenant to the land, including relevant information as to type of improvement, designed use, construction materials and finish, equipment, dimensions, floor area, age, condition, space or room arrangement, functional utility, and any other characteristics or attri- butes of the improvements germane to the value of the real property. The appraisal report shall contain a sketch plat showing the shape and dimensions of the land, the location of the principal improvements on the land, the location of any easements in the land, and the abutting streets, alleys, or other public rights-of-way. The report shall also include such exterior and interior photographs, each clearly identi- fied, as are appropriate as part of the description of the property. 4. Legal and Title Matters Affecting Value. Report of any official citations or personal observations by the APPRAISER of any condition or occupancy of the property in violation of law and any other legal or title matters affect- ing the available lawful uses or the value of the property. 5. Highest and Best Use. The APPRAISER'S opinion as to the highest and best use for the property. The appraisal reports shall also include the APPRAISER'S opinion as to any variations- of such use and any other uses or kinds of use for which the property is reasonably suitable or adaptable. Any differences between the APPRAISER'S estimate of highest and best use and the actual use of the property at the time of valuation shall be explained. . If the highest and best use is self-evident and not materially different from the actual existing use, a statement to that effect will suffice. However, if the property is unused vacant land or the highest and best use if found to differ significantly from the present use, the appraisal report shall contain the analyses by which the APPRAISER reached his conclusions as to the highest and best use and as to the relative suitability or adaptability of the property for any other available uses for which the property could reasonably be considered to be suitable or adaptable. The analysis of a potential use shall include consideration of relevant matters, such as the suitability of the location, the environment, and the legal and physical attributes of the property for such use, the estimated cost, if any, of converting the property to such use, and the supply, sale price levels, and relative- desira- bility of other properties that would compete for the same kind of use. Because the APPRAISER'S finding as to the highest and best use is a conclusion that the property does not have a higher present value for any other use, the analysis of the property for the process of appraising the property and, therefore, may be included in the valuation analysis furnished in accordance with Paragraph 10 hereof. 6. Property Valuation and Appraisal Analysis. The opinion of the APPRAISER as the fair market value of the property. The appraisal report shall contain a description of the reasoning process used by the APPRAISER in reaching his conclusion as to value and all data and analyses needed to explain and support his valuation. The supporting data and analyses furnished in the appraisal report shall include, among other things, the following: a. An analysis of the property, as identified and described in accordance with the preceding para- graphs of this SECTION, from the point of view of evaluating the effect of its characteristics and attributes on its value for the available use or uses for which the property is best suited. Particular attention shall be given to the charac- teristics of the property most relevant to its. value, such as, in the case of an investment property, the income potential and the expense of ownership, maintenance, and operation. b. Evaluation of information with respect to previous sales of the property appraised and any recent offers to the owner to sell the property. c.. The data and the analyses that constitute the principle basis for the APPRAISER'S opinion of the fair market value. Information shall be furnished with respect to recent sales of other properties which are considered by the APPRAISER to be compar- able with, and the provide useful evidence of the value of, the property appraised. The information furnished with respect to each such comparable property and its sale shall include, among other pertinent facts, the names of the grantor and grantee, the date of the sale, the sale price, any special terms or conditions or circumstances of the . sale that affected the transaction, and a descrip- tion of the property and its condition at the time of sale in sufficient detail for use in comparing it with the property appraised. The appraisal report shall contain the APPRAISER'S analysis of each comparable property and its sale in relation to the property appraised. The APPRAISER'S analy- sis in each case shall reflect consideration of,. and appropriate allowances for, the difference in the time of the sale and the date of appraisal and the differences in the utility, desirability, and productivity of the properties that are pertinent to their relative value. The appraisal report shall contain a valuation data map showing the location of the property appraised and the camper able properties referred to in the appraisal report. d. All other information, analysis, and the estimates considered by the APPRAISER to be relevant to the estimation of the fair market value of the pro- perty. e. If the property appraised is part of a larger parcel in the same ownership or is less than the entire interest of the owner in the property, the appraisal report shall contain the APPRAISER'S opinion of just compensation for a taking of such property or interest, using the before-and-after method of valuation as interpreted under State law unless it is obvious that there would be no damages or benefits to the remaining property or interest of the owner. However, if the part or interest to be taken is such a small part of the whole property that the damages for the taking can be more . accurately estimated directly, that method may be used if permitted under State law, without estimat- ing the fair market value of the entire property of the owner. The foregoing opinions of the APPRAISER shall be supported in his report by the data and analysis by which he reached his conclusions. The appraisal report shall also contain, for informa- tion purposes only (unless required by State Law) , the APPRAISER'S estimates of the fair market value of the to-be-acquired part or interest as part of the whole property and the net damages or benefits to the remaining property of the owner. If, in the opinion of the APPRAISER, acquisition of the part of, or interest in, the property proposed for acquisition would leave the owner with an uneconomic remnant, the APPRAISER shall furnish a separate estimate of the fair market value of the entire property and interests of the owner unless informed by the COUNTY that it does not have authority legally to acquire the remnant. A remainder parcel or interest shall be considered to be an uneconomic remnant if by itself it is not capable of being used economically. f. Such maps, plans, photographs, or other exhibits, as necessary, to explain or illustrate the analyses of the APPRAISER. • g. The APPRAISER'S evaluation of the indications of value deduced from his separate analyses of the various evidences of value and an explanation of how he reached his final conclusion as the fair market value of the property. 7. Land Value. The opinion of the . APPRAISER as to the fair market value of the land, if vacant. The valuation shall be for the same interest in the land as is to be acquired in the real property. The report shall contain information with respect to the available use or uses for which the land would be suitable if vacant, the opinion of the APPRAISER as to its highest and best use, and the APPRAISER'S analysis of the evidences of value and of the use potential by which he reached his conclusions as to the highest and best use and the land value. 8. Additional Findings in Certain Cases. Additional conclusions, if applicable, as follows: . a. Parcels Comprised of Independently Marketable Properties. If the parcel is marketable as two or more separate properties, the appraisal report shall, in addition to furnishing the APPRAISER'S opinion of the fair market value of the entire parcel, identify each separately marketable pro- perty by street address and the actual or an assumed suitable legal description and provide a separate estimate of the fair market value of each such separately marketable property as an indepen- dent property. The appraisal report on the entire parcel in such a case may be presented as separate reports, one for each separately marketable pro- perty, with an overall report on all such proper- ties considered as a single property. Any difference between the sum of the APPRAISER'S opinions of the fair market value of the separately marketable properties and his opinion of the fair market value of the fair market value of the entire parcel shall be explained. b. Separately Held Interests. If there are sepa- rately held interests in the real property to be acquired, such as easements, leaseholds, air rights, life estates, and oil, gas, or mineral rights, and the division of ownership is not of such character as to destroy the practical unity of the property, the APPRAISER shall apportion his • estimate of the fair market value of the property (all interests therein to be acquired) to each separately held interest. If a tenant owns any real property improvements which he has the right or obligation to remove at the expiration of his term, the apportionment between the landlord and the tenant shall be made in accordance with Para- graph c below. The report shall contain the data, analyses, and reasoning by which the APPRAISER made the apportionment. If the "unit rule" is regarded as not applicable because the division of ownership is such as to diminish the fair market value of the property as a whole, the separate interests involved shall be appraised separately. c. Tenant-Owned Improvements. If any buildings, structures, fixtures, or other improvements, com- prising part of the property appraised are identi- fied, as provided in Paragraph 5 of this agreement, as being the property of a tenant who has the right or obligation to remove them at the expiration of his term, the APPRAISER shall apportion his esti- mate of the fair market value of the real property appraised, including the property of each such tenant, to the landowner and the tenant or tenants so that the amount apportioned to each tenant for his interest in the real property will be the greatest of. (1) the fair market value of the tenant's leasehold interest in the property, (2) the amount which the tenant's property contributes to the fair market value of the property as a whole, or (3) the fair market value of the tenant's improvements for removal from the property. The. appraisal report shall state the basis for the valuation of each tenant's interest and furnish the date and analyses on which such valuation was made. d. Owner-Occupant in a Multi-family or Mixed Use Property. If the property is a multi-family or mixed-use (residential and non-residential) pro- perty and the owner of a compensable interest therein, as defined in the next sentence, occupies a dwelling in the property, the APPRAISER shall furnish an apportionment of his estimate of the fair market value of the whole property to such dwelling or to each such owner occupied dwelling if more than one, and to the remainder of the pro- perty. For the purpose of this paragraph, an occupant of a dwelling shall be considered to own a compensable interest in the property if he holds fee title, a life estate, a 99-year lease, or a lease with not less than 50 years to run from the date of valuation, or holds an interest in a cooperative housing project which includes the right of occupancy of a dwelling unit therein, or is the contract purchaser of any of the foregoing estates or interests, or has a leasehold interest with option to purchase. The APPRAISER'S report shall explain how he made the apportionment and the rationale therefore. 9. Machinery, Equipment and/or Fixtures. If machi- nery, equipment and/or fixtures used in a trade, business, farm operation, institutional or governmental function constitute part of the real property, the appraisal report shall contain a separate schedule which provides separate estimates for each such item, as prescribed below. If there is more than one owner of such items, a separate schedule shall be furnished for each owner. The information and conclusions to be furnished on each item are as follows: (1) Description of the item, including, as appropriate, the manufacturer, model and serial number, size or capacity, age and condition, and degree of obsole- scence. Accessories and spare parts, special foundations, and power wiring and process piping generally shall be listed separately, following the listing of the item(s) to which they apply. (2) Estimate of the replacement cost installed of the item as listed and identified (excluding any elements listed separately) . Separately identify the basis of estimated replacement cost new or used) . (3) The contributive (enhancement) value of the item to the fair market value of the real property• as a whole. (4) Estimated fair market value of the item for removal . from the property at a purchaser's expense. Such value shall be considered to be the probable selling price if the item were offered for sale for removal from the property at the purchaser's expense, allowing a reasonable time to find a purchaser buying with knowledge of the uses and purposes for which it is adaptable and capable of being used, including salvage for serviceable components and scrap when it appears that will provide the highest value. The schedule(s) of estimates shall be consistent, with the property analysis approved by the COUNTY, as provided. The APPRAISER is permitted to use the services of such technical specialists as may be needed to enable the APPRAISER to provide valid estimates and sound valuations. The schedule(s) shall be supported by an explanation of the proce- dures followed in gathering the necessary market information and technical data. The principle purpose of the APPRAISER'S accompanying narrative, however, must be to explain his analyses and his evaluations of the dollar amount of the overall contribution of the machinery, equipment, and fixtures to the fair market value of the real property as a whole. The report shall contain any • layout plans, sketches, or photographs that are restrictions, mineral rights, leases, and any known, but unrecorded, interests of other parties. Sufficient information shall be furnished to disclose the probable effect of such outstanding interests on the title of the record owner. (5) Outstanding special assessments, if any, for public improvements such as streets, sidewalks, public utilities, and similar public facilities; (6) The amount of real estate taxes for the current year and the assessed valuation stated separately for land and for improvements. SECTION V TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The preparation and delivery of the required appraisal reports by the APPRAISER, as outlined in the applicable sections of this agreement, shall be completed within thirty (30) calendar days after the APPRAISER has received a Notice to Proceed issued by the COUNTY. It is understood by the parties to this agreement that the time within which the work is to be performed is of primary importance and of the essence of this agreement. The APPRAISER will proceed with the work outlined herein in such sequence and order as to the different parcels as the COUNTY may, in writing, direct, and will furnish and deliver the appraisal reviews and price recommendations to the COUNTY as soon as completed. SECTION VI MAXIMUM COMPENSATION PAYABLE The COUNTY shall compensate the APPRAISER for the services rendered under this agreement on the following basis: 1. For the basic services described in SECTION III, exclusive of those services rendered in accordance with any other sections of this agreement, the APPRAISER shall receive total maximum compensation not to exceed $5,000. In the event unforeseen circumstances result in the COUNTY desiring additional services whose cost is in excess of the total maximum compensation payable hereabove, a mutually agreeable written addendum to increase the maximum compensation payable shall be negotiated and incorporated into this agreement. 2. The specific fees to be charged by- the APPRAISER and paid by the COUNTY shall be in accordance with Exhibit B- Fee Schedule, which is attached to this agreement. 3. For additional services to be rendered by the APPRAISER for supplementary parcels added to this agreement, in the same manner as described previously, the APPRAISER shall receive additional compensation at the rates shown on Exhibit B attached to this agreement. Such services shall be submitted to the COUNTY within the same timeframe as outlined previously in SECTION V. 4. For services as an expert witness for the COUNTY in judicial proceedings, including formal pre-trial conference, as provided with respect to any property appraised by the APPRAISER pursuant to this agreement, the APPRAISER and the COUNTY hereby agree that the fair and reasonable compensation for the APPRAISER'S services shall be at the rate of $150.00 per day for each day of court testimony and/or pre-trial. conference. In the event such attendance shall be for one- half day or less, compensation shall be made on the basis of $75. 00 for such half-day. The payments outlined above shall be made to the APPRAISER by the COUNTY subject to completion of the required service appropriate recognition by the court of the APPRAISER as an expert witness and the receipt of an appropriate requisition. BY: (Appraiser) Route 5, Box 90 (Street Address) Chapel Hill , NC 27514 (City) (State) (Zip Code) Kathleen K. Buck, Appraiser • (Agency) ATTEST: Xe-6€14 (-1-/ COUNTY OF ORANGE, NORTH CAROLINA • BY: ..- 'a NI ,;(1 Ut. ' - - i:nance Oioces ei Oraase a Exhibit B - FEE SCHEDULE to AGREEMENT FOR APPRAISAL SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACQUISITION OF LAND between COUNTY OF ORANGE, NORTH CAROLINA and KATHLEEN K. BUCK, APPRAISER ROUTE 5, BOX 90 CHAPEL HILL, N.C. The following fees shall be used in calculating the compensation to be paid to the APPRAISER by the COUNTY in. fulfilling the obligations under this agreement: $150.00 Per Parcel - CHANGE Distribution to ORDER OWNER ARCHlll-.CT g] OCT 23 Ain lxO(:UMENT G701 CONTRACTOR [2. • 1 FIELD ❑ OTHER ❑ ',,W. N1,41iD I✓UNS) CO. iNC. PROTECT: Carr Building Renovation CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 1 - (name. address► Corbin St. Hillsborough, NC INITIATION DATE: 9-29-86 TO (Contractor): ARCHITECTS PROJECT NO: 5568 D.W. .Ward Construction Co. CONTRACT EC?R- - P.O. Box 15157 General Construction Durham, NC 27704 J CONTRACT DATE:AuguSt 13, 1986 You aro'directed to make the following changes in this Contract: Item One Reduce thickness of metal roof to 26 gauge Credit $7,995.00 • Item Two Remove section of terrazzo floor topping Extra 334.00 Resultant Change Order Amount Credit $7,661.00 \,i1%maid until..itiru•tl h)'both•Iht•(htnrr mill Art hilt.t t. till;n,ti r' ui II (•rutIr,u lur .rgrt•t•nu•nI Itt•rt•teilh• int hiding any adlustinvnl in the contract Sum ar corium 1 t I'hl' original (Contract Sum) ttk,(1/du((/rdliA111k kUitAitiwas .. $ $221,856.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders $ _0_ The (Contract Sum) (d(uJirAtc/df 1W1iiiduid Lida prior to this Change Order was $ 221,856. the IC:untracl Sum)tdnUrlitilJJ/ t/iu{r/i/dds/l/wiII be/i>S(Wr4A Wt/(decreased/Atit{J tikidi by this (:hinge Order $ 7,661. The new (Contract Sum)i((�l�yFy(1i(1 !")(i/`i/)/c/'Y•//Ilti including this Change Order will he -.- $ 214,195. • The Contract Time will he 000/4,144¢1/fcAihie, yk1(.(unchanged) by ( –0_ ) Days The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of Ihi; Change Order therefore is February 27, 1987 AuthOrize(l: CHR Associates, PA D.W. Ward Construction Co. .County of Orange .'/ Ia,I r port Road ( b AC (M om�n eati on tL_ O VNtR 106 F._ filar rPt i anP Chapel Hill, NC 2 514 Durham, NC 27704 Hill borough NC 27278 c?' Q� gtr .._.. I):�IL 'C�- L?� _ I)Arl/ 2 9 DATE - - AIA UUCUMLNT G7111 • (IIAN(a: (MRIIII: • AI'KII 1,1:11 (1)1111 IN • AI,r •••i•);t1 1111 Val"(WAN IN%1111111.111101 AK(I 11 l l t 1%, 1711 NI W l0R .\\'I'.,`.w..�1'1A111NU tt).\•MU. _111$11. G701 -197 • f COUNTY OF ORANGE HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA AND HAZEN AND SAWYER, P. C. AGREEMENT RE : STUDY AND EVALUATION OF ADDITIONAL WATER SUPPLY DEVELOPMENT IN ORANGE COUNTY CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA AND HAZEN AND SAWYER, P. C. WATER SUPPLY DEVELOPMENT STUDY THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this i3z4 day of , 1986 by and between The COUNTY OF ORANGE , a body politic and corporate of the State of North Carolina, with offices at 106 East Margaret Lane , Hillsborough , North Carolina 27278 , hereinafter called the OWNER; and HAZEN AND SAWYER, P . C . , a professional corporation , with offices at 730 Broadway , New York , New York 10003 and 4300 Glenwood Avenue , Raleigh , North Carolina 27612 , hereinafter called the ENGINEERS; WHEREAS , the OWNER desires to evaluate the most economical alternative for developing an additional water supply to serve the County; and WHEREAS , the OWNER desires to engage the ENGINEERS to provide the professional engineering services for studies and evaluations listed in Article I; Page 1 of 11 -- i WITNESSETH , that the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows : ARTICLE I - DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED The engineering services to be performed under this Agreement can generally be divided into two phases . The first phase will consist of a feasibility study to determine the most appropriate alternative for meeting the long-term water supply needs of Orange County . The second phase will consist of developing additional site specific engineering and cost data for the alternative recommended during Phase 1 . Specific tasks to be performed during each phase are as follows : Phase 1 1 . Population and water use projections will be developed for a planning period of 30 to 40 years . Population and water use projections developed by other governmental agencies will be obtained and reviewed to establish a complete data base for determining future water needs . 2 . Utilizing existing sources , data will be collected concerning the existing land- use features , historic structures and sites , geology , soils , climatology , socioeconomic characteristics , water and biological resources , and point and non - point sources of pollution . 3. Using existing topographic information , potential reservoir sites in the upper Eno basin will be Page 2 of 11 identified and evaluated . At a minimum, alternatives selected for study will include the Seven Mile Creek site and expansion of Corporation Lake . Evaluation criteria will include the following : a . Topographic and geophysical characteristics of the site. b. Required storage volume based on low flow hydrologic calculations . c. Land and building acquisitions and required relocations of highways and roads . d . Drainage area location and characteristics as related to present and expected future water quality and suitability for use as a public water supply. 4. The feasibility of utilizing raw water from Jordan Lake in lieu of constructing a new reservoir will be evaluated . Consideration will be given to the advantages of a water treatment plant facility located near the lake intake source . Evaluation criteria will include availability of suitable intake site ( s ) , pipeline routings , treatability and water quality, and the feasibility of regional utilization . 5 . A preliminary feasibility assessment will be made for each alternative identified . For those alternatives determined feasible , the following information will be developed: Page 3 of 11 a . Preliminary construction layouts will be prepared for the purposes of establishing the nature and quantity of work required . b . Estimates of land area needs and relocations will be developed to the extent possible based on available information . c . Preliminary estimates of spillway requirements will be developed based on current North Carolina regulations , if applicable . d . Preliminary cost estimates will be developed for construction , including land acquisition and estimated annual operation and maintenance expenses . e . A preliminary assessment of expected environmental and socioeconomic impacts will be made . 6. Alternate means of financing the recommended project will be considered , including creation of special tax districts and alternate bond financing . Preliminary estimates of user fees will be prepared for project benefactors . 7 . A preliminary report will be prepared covering all of the aspects of the feasibility study . The report discussion will include consideration of available methods for financing, steps and procedures involved in implementing the recommended construction program . This report will be submitted to the County Page 4 of 11 Commissioners for comment and concurrence in the recommended alternative prior to proceeding to Phase 2 of the study. Phase 2 Phase 2 of the study will not be undertaken until authorized by the County . This phase of the work will consist of developing additional site specific engineering and cost information for the recommended alternative . Additional preliminary engineering studies will be undertaken to refine project concepts with emphasis given to more accurately defining the nature and scope of the required construction and the associated construction cost . Specific tasks to be performed include the following : 1 . Aerial topographic mapping of the recommended dam site , if applicable . 2 . A geological site reconnaissance and limited subsurface investigation to determine the geophysical characteristics of the site . 3 . Preparation of more detailed preliminary site layouts and construction cost estimates . 4 . A final report will be prepared summarizing the results of the additional studies performed during Phase 2 . ARTICLE II SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED The engineering services to be performed under this Agreement are divided into two parts as follows : Page 5 of 11 A. Phase 1 Phase 1 of the study shall be as described in Article I of this Agreement . Phase 1 will include preparation of a preliminary report describing the evaluations made during the course of the study and recommending the most appropriate alternative for meeting the long-term water supply needs of Orange County . Monthly meetings with the Water Supply Advisory Committee are included during this phase . B . Phase 2 Phase 2 of the study will not be undertaken until authorized by the OWNER . The purpose of this portion of the study will be to develop more detailed engineering and cost information for the recommended alterative . Specific tasks to be performed shall be as described in Article I of this Agreement . ARTICLE III - SCHEDULE The work to be performed and the services to be rendered under each part of this Agreement shall commence as directed by the OWNER . The study described under Article II , Part A shall be completed within approximately six ( 6 ) months following authorization to proceed by the OWNER . The additional engineering evaluations described in Article II , Part B will be completed in approximately three ( 3 ) months following authorization to proceed by the OWNER. Page 6 of 11 ARTICLE IV - COMPENSATION For the engineering services described in Article II , individual or combined cost ceilings shall be established as indicated below . Within these cost ceilings the ENGINEERS shall be compensated as follows : ( 1) Each hour of service rendered as a direct charge to this Contract shall be billed at payroll costs times the multipler indicated for each service . Payroll costs include base salary , vacations , sick leave , holidays , payroll taxes and insurance and pension plan . ( 2) Mileage costs directly chargeable to this project will be billed at the ENGINEERS ' standard employee reimbursement rate of 21 cents per mile . Other travel expenses shall be billed at actual cost . ( 3) Work done by others on a subcontract basis shall be billed at actual cost to the ENGINEERS . Subcontract work will not start until approved by the OWNER. BASIS OF COMPENSATION Payroll Cost Service Multiplier Cost Ceiling Article IIA - Phase 1 2 . 15 $40,000 Article IIB - Phase 2 2 . 15 $20,000 ARTICLE V - PAYMENT Partial payment shall be made to the ENGINEERS monthly as work progresses on the basis of hours charged to the job during the previous month by principals and employees of the ENGINEERS, Page 7 of 11 multiplied by the payroll cost and designated multiplier , plus costs for mileage , travel , and other allowable expenses during the previous month as set forth in Article IV of this Agreement . The ENGINEERS shall submit monthly statements requesting payment , supplemented or accompanied by such supporting data as may be required by the OWNER . The OWNER shall act upon the ENGINEERS ' requests for payment within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt . ARTICLE VI - PERSONNEL AND FACILITIES The ENGINEERS hereby state that they now have or will secure at their expense , including subcontractors , all personnel and facilities required to perform the services set forth under this Agreement . All personnel assigned to work under this Contract shall be fully qualified . Services shall be provided in accordance with national , state, and local statutes , ordinances , codes and regulations , and with accepted engineering practices . The ENGINEERS may subcontract certain portions of the work included under this Agreement including , but not limited to , surveys , geotechnical and special testing services . Subcontractor payment shall be in accordance with Article IV . ARTICLE VII - SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE OWNER It is agreed and understood that certain assistance will be furnished by the OWNER, such as the following : 1. Assist the ENGINEERS by placing at their disposal all available information pertinent to the project , including previous reports, etc . Page 8 of 11 2 . Furnish to the ENGINEERS, as required for performance of their services , existing site information such as property boundaries , easements, rights-of-way and deed restrictions , etc . 3 . Obtain access for the ENGINEERS to enter upon public and private property as required for performance of services described herein . 4. Render in a reasonable time , in writing , as requested by the ENGINEER, responses to questions or requests made by the ENGINEER that may be necessary to complete portions of the work . 5 . Give prompt written notice to the ENGINEERS whenever the OWNER observe or are advised of any deficiencies or changed circumstances in this project . This shall not however reduce the responsibility of the ENGINEERS to perform these duties in a competent and professional manner and will not relieve the ENGINEER of any liability for his design . 6 . Furnish the ENGINEERS in a timely manner with copies of pertinent correspondence relating to this project which would not otherwise have been delivered to the ENGINEERS. ARTICLE VIII - TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT If, through any cause, the ENGINEER shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner his obligations under this Contract , or if ENGINEERS shall violate any of the stipulations of this Page 9 of 11 Contract , the OWNER shall thereupon have the right to terminate this Contract by giving written notice to the ENGINEERS of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof . In such event , all finished or unfinished documents , data , studies , and reports prepared by the ENGINEERS under this Agreement shall become the OWNER ' S property . The payment to the ENGINEERS will be negotiated based on the amount of satisfactory work completed at the time of termination . ARTICLE IX - ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENT Neither the ENGINEERS nor the OWNER shall transfer or assign this Agreement to any third party or parties without the written permission of the other . ARTICLE X - APPLICABLE LAW This Agreement , including , but not by way of limiting the interpretation thereof and the rights and remedies of the parties thereunder , shall be governed by the laws of the State of North Carolina . Except as this Agreement otherwise provides , all claims , counterclaims, disputes and other matters in question between the OWNER and the ENGINEERS arising out of , or relating to this Contract or the breach of it , will be decided by resort to the court of competent jurisdiction within the State of North Carolina unless the parties hereto mutually agree to submit any such dispute for resolution by Arbitration . In the event of any legal controversy requiring the services of the ENGINEERS in providing expert testimony in connection with Page 10 of 11 a " ae the project , all costs involved with such testimony and preparation thereof shall be negotiated. ARTICLE XI - ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement states the entire agreement between the parties and shall not be modified except in writing signed by authorized representatives of both parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year above written . COUNTY OF ORANGE HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA BY : td.14.7// Don Wi lihoit, Chair Board of County Commissioners HAZEN AND SAWYER, P.C. lt.e....e.akk17...40gle, BY: / �dl itness Gordon C. Rugg ,! Vice President IE This document has been preaudited in the manner required by the Local Government and Fiscal Control Act . -)sof-r,Por /t< Page 11 of 11 APPED 11/3/86 1 ROV MINUTES ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS QUARTERLY JOINT PUBLIC HEARING AND REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 6, 1986 The Orange County Board of Commissioners met in joint session with the Planning Board to hold the quarterly public hearing which was continued from August 25 and September 16 and to hold a regular meeting on October 6, 1986 at 7: 30 p.m. in Superior Courtroom, Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chair Don Willhoit and Commissioners Shirley Marshall, Moses Carey, Jr. , Ben Lloyd and Norman Walker. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice-Chair Carl Walters, David Shanklin, Tim Hubbard, Chris Best, Prince Taylor, Peter Kramer, Michael Lewis, Sharlene Pilkey, Betty Margison and Steve Yuhasz. ATTORNEY PRESENT: Geoffrey Gledhill. STAFF PRESENT: County Manager Kenneth R. Thompson, Assistant County Managers William T. Laws and Albert Kittrell, Director of Planning Marvin Collins, Planners Gene Bell and Brad Torgan, Administrative Secretary Joanna Bradshaw and Clerk to the Board Beverly A. Blythe. D. PUBLIC HEARINGS 3 . ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENTS b. Article 6.21. 1 Existing or New Mobile Home Parks - Deletion of retroactive application of design standards and report on public safety requirements for parks Collins began by reviewing the history of the Mobile Home Ordinance to this particular point. In March of this year the Board of Commissioners adopted an ordinance which would require existing mobile home parks to comply with new standards for mobile home parks. On April 7, the Board of Commissioners placed a moratorium on the enforcement of the new standards as they applied to existing mobile home parks. The moratorium was placed into effect pending a review of the standards by the Planning Board. The Planning Board Ordinance Review Committee conducted a public meeting on July 31, 1986 for the purpose of receiving public comment. Two issues emerged at the Committee meeting: (1) the "retroactive" nature of the ordinance; and (2) the standards. Spokesman for the group present asked that the provisions - Article 6.21. 1 a) 2) - be rescinded. The Ordinance Review Committee of the Planning Board as well as the full Planning Board recommended that a public hearing be held this date to consider deletion of Article 6.21. 1 a) 2) of the Zoning Ordinance. The provision requires each mobile home park to be improved in accordance with Subsection 7.20.4a) which contains the new design standards for mobile home parks. The design standards include a 10, 000 square foot space per mobile home unit, setbacks for each mobile home unit from lot lines of that mobile home space which are 25 ' on the front with a 180 square foot patio or deck and also improvement of the actual space on which the mobile home would sit. 2 The deletion of Article 6.21.1 a) 2) , if approved, would provide a "grandfather situation" for existing nonconforming mobile home parks; they could exist as they are with units being removed and replaced provided the overall number of units do not increase and the mobile home park itself is not expanded. Collins noted that if this ordinance amendment is approved, there will be a study of existing mobile home parks and the standards which have been adopted to determine whether or not they are fair and equitable in their application. There has been a report submitted to the Board of Commissioners. Additional information has been distributed tonight which was received from the Sheriff's Department regarding the number of calls received from mobile home parks in the last four years. Collins noted that this report indicated that approximately 5% of all calls received by the Sheriff's Department were from residents of mobile home courts and parks and that 11% of the housing in Orange County is mobile homes. It is the desire of the Planning Staff to develop an ordinance which is satisfactory to Orange County, the mobile home park owner/operators and the residents of the parks. The emphasis of the study would be on the health and safety issues and what standards, if any, should apply to new and existing mobile home parks. Chair Walters noted that the proposed amendment to Article 6.21. 1 a) 2) would, in effect, delete the requirement that each mobile home space in an existing mobile home park be improved in accordance with subsection 7.20.4 a) that contains new design standards regarding space size (10, 000 sq. ft. ) , setbacks, patios/decks, etc. Jim Cole, attorney representing mobile home park owner/operators, spoke. He indicated that the citizens in attendance had already attended several meetings and had expressed their desire to have Article 6.21. 1 a) 2) deleted. He addressed the following paragraph from the agenda abstract: "The deletion of Article 6.21. 1 a) 2) , if approved would provide a 'grandfather situation' for existing nonconforming mobile home parks during a period in which mobile home park owner/operators would work with the Planning Department/Board in developing standards for new/existing parks. The standards would then be brought back to public hearing at a later date. " He stated that the desire of the park owner/operators is to delete the Article and keep the existing standards for existing mobile home parks and have the new standards for new mobile home parks. He continued inquiring why mobile home parks were "picked out" for an investigation into health and safety standards rather than such an investigation being conducted for all of Orange County housing. He indicated that 2/3 or more of the people living in mobile home parks own their own lot and that those citizens do not feel such an investigation is needed. He suggested that there are apartment projects in Orange County which present health and safety hazards and are not being investigated. Mr. Cole continued, expressing the feeling that mobile home park owner/operators as well as mobile home park residents were being legislated out of existence simply because the aesthetics were not what some Board members would desire. Cheryl Moody noted that her mobile home park has been in existence for thirty years. She continued that she is a teacher, a 3 and that this professionalism is carried over into the operationsofonthe mobile home park. She continued, expressing the feeling that the service of moderate income housing was being provided and noted some of the services and advantages that were available to residents of the mobile home park. She indicated the feeling of pride and accomplishment in her mobile home park which the ordinance would take away. Joey Colclough read from a newspaper article dated March 22, 1985 which quoted Don Willhoit, Chair of the Board of County Commissioners as saying "It appears that we are well on our way to becoming the mobile home capital of North Carolina. " He expressed concerns that Orange County is trying to take away "rights" which had been previously granted by the Constitution. He noted the desire of the manufactured housing communities is to be left alone to continue the right of enjoyment and the operation of the legal business of mobile home parks. Jimmy Freeland, operator of J & J Mobile Home Park, stated that in fourteen years of operation he had never called the Sheriff's Department to his mobile home park. He indicated he felt he would be unable to maintain his business if he had to make the improvements indicated by Article 6.21.1 a) 2) . Curtis Bane, Jr. , owner/operator of Euglina Junction and Stonegate Mobile Home Park, indicated that at times when a mobile home is replaced changes may need to be made in the set up and utility lines may need to be moved. If the mobile home is set in stone this could be very difficult. He also expressed concern with the requirements for storage buildings. He indicated that any changes should be moderated by State standards. James Ban, mobile home resident, expressed concern that he would not be able to afford his mobile home if he had to make the improvements indicated by Article 6.21. 1 a) 2) . Louis Berini, mobile home park owner in Eno Township, referenced a letter asking for comments on the proposed mobile home standards. He expressed concern interpreting the words "improvements" and "development" noting that these words are the key to the change in the zoning ordinance. He noted that Webster's Dictionary gives the definition of "improve" as "to make, as land or real estate, more profitable by cultivation or construction". He noted as an example the betterment of a road means the resurfacing of it not the destruction of it simply to resurface it. He stated further that the definition of "development" is "the gradual growth of advancement to progressive changes from an embryo state until maturity" . He felt that in real estate this would mean the beginning of the plan, the actual construction and the completion of the project. Mr. Berini continued that his interpretation of improving a mobile home park would not include the destruction of the facilities of the adjacent space as he felt the zoning amendment would require the park owner to do in order to meet the higher level of amenities. He continued that zoning should not require condemnation and destruction of the use of a lot, and he felt this was unconstitutional. Mr. Berini asked that the Board members place themselves in the position of the mobile home residents and park owners and consider how they would desire the decision on the amendment to be made. He reminded the Boards that regulations in effect at the time the parks were built had been met. 4 J. B. Stinson, owner of a mobile home park on Route 2, Mebane, stated he had been having problems since December, 1985 with Orange County concerning the placement of an additional mobile home in his park. He expressed much dissatisfaction with current regulations and felt there was no need for further regulations. Beth Bradshaw, mobile home park owner, stated that her mobile home community was built in such a manner that surpassed regulations and requirements. She noted that there is always a waiting list for a space in her park. She continued expressing the concern that any retroactive amendment would be illegal. She noted that retroactive legislation was not needed and urged the Boards to go forward with the knowledge that had been gained and initiate regulations for new mobile home parks only. Ronald Gammon, mobile home owner, expressed dissatisfaction with the retroactive amendment. He asked the Boards how they would react if they were told to make considerable improvements to their homes which they did not want or could not afford. Ronnie Hester, a four-year resident in a mobile home in Orange County, expressed concern that more was being required of residents than they wanted or could afford. He also noted that for many residents, a mobile home is a stepping stone to owning property and a home. Katherine Mercer, a mobile home resident, expressed concern that facts about mobile home parks had been distorted. She indicated that she felt the mobile home park owner/operators deserved a grandfather clause without qualifications. She felt this would take care of discrimination against mobile homes. She noted that she is well pleased with the lot she has in a park. Joseph B. Supeano, mobile home owner/property owner, stated that he had moved to North Carolina from Connecticut and is well pleased with his home in Joppa Oaks. He noted that restrictions in North Carolina were not as strict as those in Connecticut nor is the tax base in Orange County as high. He expressed concern with the possibility of new restrictions being placed on existing mobile home parks. Forrest Heath, owner/operator of Ridgewood Mobile Home Park, stated that his park was begun in 1965 before zoning in Orange County. He noted that his park was approximately 25% completed when zoning was enacted. Three-fourths of the property of his park was zoned residential with only one- fourth being zoned mobile home park district. He explained the process he pursued to obtain a zoning change. He also reviewed the actions taken by the Board and explained the court proceedings which he had to engage in to obtain the zoning change. He expressed concern with "retroactive" amendments, especially with the court process he had had to go through. Collins indicated that many valid considerations had been presented in regard to the standards. He noted that these represent the real 1 reason that he is recommending further study of the standards. He noted that EMS and the Sheriff's Department had expressed concern with the lack of a numbering system in the parks and the width of some of the travelways. He stated that these considerations indicate to him that the Planning Board and Planning Staff and mobile home park owner/operators need to work together on standards which are realistic and equitable. 5 Emily Bane Villinova expressed the concern that placing more restrictions on mobile homes would affect their affordability. She encouraged the Board of Commissioners to listen to the comments from mobile home park owner/operators and act accordingly. Bart Walters stated that he has been a mobile home park dweller for over five years and was only moving now due to the fact that he had been able to save money to purchase property of his own. He indicated he felt the mobile home parks should be able to continue operation under the standards which were in effect at the time they were built. It was asked from the audience that the amendment be read in its entirety. Collins responded that there is not a text amendment per se in written form. If something is deleted from the text it is not written, it is simply taken out of the ordinance. He continued reading Article 6.21. 1 a 2) and noting that the phrase "that the space be improved in accordance with Subsection 7.20.4a) of this ordinance" is the phrase which requires existing mobile home parks to comply with the new standards. By deleting this phrase, a grandfather situation would be created. 1. ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENTS a. Z-7-86 Allen and Doris Turner (Continued from 8-25-86) The presentation was made by Marvin Collins. This agenda item is to receive public comment on a proposed rezoning request submitted by Allen and Doris Turner. Allen and Doris Turner are requesting rezoning of a 14.97 acre tract located on a gravel access road partially maintained by NCDOT. The access road connects to U.S. 70 at the southwest intersection corner of U.S. 70 and Interstate 85 in Eno Township. The property is known as Lot 77 and 77A of Tax Map 25. The property is located in an area designated Twenty Year Transition and Commercial- Industrial Transition Activity Node in the Orange County Land Use Plan. The present zoning classification of the property is Rural Residential (R- 1) . The applicant is requesting the lot be rezoned to General Commercial-4 (GC-4) . Approval of the request would allow development of the full range of commercial uses at this location. Properties to the east and west of the tract are zoned GC-4. Rezoning of the property would allow for the development of the site as a single commercial project or, alternatively, the subdivision of the property into individual lots for commercial development. Collins indicated information has been received that has to do with a letter submitted by the Division of Environmental Management concerning noncompliance with NC General Statutes regarding wash water and discharge of oil. Collins continued that Mr. Turner has come into compliance with DEM's notice of non- compliance. Due to the nature of this business and the closer review needed, Collins stated that Planning Staff is recommending denial of the request with resubmission as Planned Development. A Planned Development is a more suitable approach for rezoning of this property in that it would not only allow the Board of Commissioners and the Planning Board to consider the specific request again but it would also allow them to look at a specific site plan for the development of the project. At that time rmmlim 6 conditions could be attached to the approval which would address any concerns that resulted from the review of the site plan of the request. Because of the size of the property, there could be considerable generation of traffic. This would also be addressed through a Planned Development request. Commissioner Lloyd inquired why Planning Staff would recommend Planned Development when the applicant met all the criteria for a straight rezoning. Collins responded that the rezoning process is a more open-ended process in that the Commissioners have more latitude in making a determination as to whether or not to approve or deny the request. The Special Use or Planned Development process is more closed in that if certain findings-of-fact are made, then the Commissioners must issue the permit. Through the straight rezoning process the County loses the ability to mitigate any negative impacts that result from the project whereas a Special Use Permit or Planned Development approach would allow the County to address those impacts while at the same time allowing the citizen to use the property as he wished. Collins submitted photographs showing the present condition of the property. Ken Embree, attorney representing the Turners, indicated he had more information regarding the letter from DEM concerning the non compliance. He stated that Mr. Turner did receive a notice of the violation in May. When the investigator came out and pointed the violation out to Mr. Turner, he stopped washing the heavy equipment immediately in such a way as to cause the discharge and has refrained from doing so since that time. Mr. Embree continued that there is a special type of collection basin that can be constructed under design specifications from DEM to prevent the discharge from occurring again. He noted that Mr. Turner will comply with those regulations in order to request a permit from DEM; this would enable Mr. Turner to address the concern noted by Collins. Embree continued that before Staff knew about the discharge violation, they had recommended approval of the rezoning request. Embree indicated on a map that there are areas surrounding this property that are zoned GC-4 (General Commercial-4) near the intersection of US 70 and I-85. This is the only tract on the south side of the access for US 70 which is not zoned GC-4. Embree continued that Turner has submitted an Erosion Control Plan which has been approved and has also submitted a site plan which shows the seeding of the property and the planting of trees. Mr. Embree noted that Mr. Turner had responded to all the regulations as he was informed and encouraged the straight rezoning of the property. Commissioner Lloyd inquired why, with the problem of discharge solved, did Planning Staff not go back to its original recommendation of straight rezoning. Collins responded that the size of the tract and the potential for development and traffic generation were concerns of staff. Collins continued that the letter from DEM added to the concerns for potential for impacts with the development of the site, particularly if the major part is to be developed for the paving company. Yuhasz inquired if the traffic impacts from this property would be any greater than that from the adjoining properties currently zoned GC 4. Collins responded that they may be lesser than or greater than but there is little that can be done about those tracts already zoned GC-4. 7 Pilkey inquired about the 50' buffer. Embree responded that a landscaping plan has been submitted and approval has been given. Most of the area will be reseeded and trees planted according to the landscaping plan. He noted that the planting will be done when it rains. Margison inquired about drainage fields. Embree responded that the existing system has been approved by the Orange County Health Department. He continued that no activity could take place on the tract until such time as the retention basin is in place and a permit is issued from DEM. Commissioner Marshall inquired about the additional permits Embree had referenced and the landscaping plan. Embree responded that the property was within the Major Transportation Corridor, that a landscape plan had been approved, and that a letter of credit posted for the improvements. b. Z-8-86 ROBERT FAIRCLOTH AND R. B. BARLOW, JR. (CONTINUED FROM 8-25-86) The presentation was made by Collins. This agenda item is to receive public comment on a proposed rezoning request for the property of R.B. Barlow, Jr. and Robert Faircloth to correct an error in the Zoning Atlas. The Planning Department initiated the request following a complaint about the nature of the use (auto repair shop) on Lot 11 of Tax Map 30 in Cheeks Township. An adjoining lot, Lot 10, was incorrectly designated Existing Commercial (EC-5) at the time Cheeks Township was zoned (October 1, 1984) . Lot 10 is a vacant, wooded lot and is 0.98 acres (42,511 square feet) in size. Lot 11 is 0.72 acres (31, 188 square feet) in size and contains five (5) buildings - a 26 'x28 ' residence, store building, trailer, 9 'x13 ' shed and a 31'x35' garage. Both lots front on US Highway 70 and are situated between Frazier Road (SR 1310) and Redman Crossing (SR 1399) . At the time Cheeks Township was zoned, Lot 11 was occupied by Tyndall 's Gas and Grocery, and Lawn Mower Repair Shop. Both lots are designated Ten Year Transition and Water Supply Watershed in the Land Use Plan. The present zoning of Lot 10 is Existing Commercial (EC-5) , while the proposed zoning classification is R-1 Residential. The present zoning of Lot 11 is R-1 Residential, while the proposed zoning is Existing Commercial (EC-5) . Approval of the request would correct an error in the Zoning Atlas made at the time Cheeks Township was zoned. A complaint has been filed concerning the nature of the use on Lot 11 - an auto repair shop. The complaint has addressed concerns about the excessive noise both during and after normal working hours, the unsightly nature of the operation, and travel safety since cars are parked within the right of-way of Highway 70. The 1984 traffic count on US Highway 70 was 5,700 trips per day. mow. 8 Article 6.14.2 of the Zoning Ordinance sets performance standards in regard to permitted noise levels. For properties zoned EC 5, noise levels cannot exceed 50 decibels between 7:00 a.m. and 7: 00 p.m. or 45 decibels between 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. For purposes of comparison, the noise level on a busy urban street is 90 decibels, while an accelerating motorcycle is rated at 110 decibels. The racing of automobile engines on Lot 11 would fall within the same general rating. The Sheriff's Department has a decibel meter with which to determine if performance standards are met. The obvious problem of enforcement is that noise levels could be decreased at the time deputies appear to take measurements. A similar problem already exists in that automobile noise levels are increased after deputies have warned the occupants of the site that they are disturbing neighbors. The Planning Department recommends approval of the rezoning of Lot 10 from EC-5 to R-1. The Planning Department recommends that Lot 11 be left in an R- 1 classification. Nonresidential uses on that site would become nonconforming and subject to the provisions of Article 11.9. Basically, that use would be allowed to remain and continue to operate as a nonconforming use as long as it did not cease to exist for a period of more than six months. If it were replaced with another use, that use would have to be one that is permitted in the R-1 district. Due to the nature of the complaints and the current use of the property, staff feels that this would be the best long-range solution. Commissioner Carey inquired if there had been complaints about the EC-5 tracts across the street. Collins responded no. Robert Faircloth, owner of the property in question, indicated he had talked with the operators of auto repair shop and had stressed to them that the noise must cease or he would have to ask them to vacate the premises. Bob Snyder, owner of the adjacent property stated that he had not seen any reduction in activity and the noise had not decreased. Yuhasz inquired if there were performance standards for non conforming uses as related to noise. County Attorney Geoffrey Gledhill responded that there are no noise standards for residential developments in the Zoning Ordinance. Collins stated there is a Noise Ordinance which could be enforced in this situation. Bob Snyder, owner of property across the street from the Faircloth property (Lot #11) . He stated that the operators work on domestic vehicles as well as race cars. He noted that he filed a complaint with the Orange County Planning Department on August 7, 1986 with Gene Bell. He read from the original complaint noting traffic hazards created by autos being parked on the right-of-way on either side of the road as well as excessive noise during and after business hours. He noted that much of the work was done on race car engines which have no mufflers which would reduce the the noise to an acceptable level. Numerous requests have been made of the garage operators to stop or at least decrease the volume of noise generated after regular working hours with no success. He noted that complaints have been filed over the last twenty months with the Sheriff's Department. When the deputies leave the site, the noise level increases rather than decreases. Deputies rmmm have also informed Mr. Snyder that there are no ordinances which they can enforce to stop the noise at any time. Mr. Snyder disagreed; there are ordinances which, when enforced, can stop the noise. He urged the Board of County Commissioners to determine the accuracy of wording and the validity of application of the ordinance to the above mentioned garage. The following petition was read by Mr. Snyder: "We the property owners and interested parties hereby petition you, the Board of Commissioners to not allow the error in zoning to invalidate any applicable ordinance or affect the enforcement thereof based solely on the technicality of such and not to allow any change in the zoning status of 3. 3011 regardless of how or when it was zoned without first making a thorough inspection of the premises and all pertinent facts and making a determination as to the suitability of subject property for any use as provided in all applicable ordinances. " Snyder continued that the disturbance from this property began in January 1985 and has caused unnecessary hardships and much mental anguish. He asked that the Board of Commissioners to administer and enforce all applicable ordinances fairly to all interested parties. Yuhasz inquired what use was on the property in 1984. Snyder responded that Mr. and Mrs. Tyndall operated a small grocery and gas station prior to their deaths in 1983. Between 1983 and January 1985, a small engine repair shop was on the site. Joe Atwell, resident directly across the street from the garage, commented that even though Mr. Faircloth may have talked to the operators of the garage, the problem has not been corrected. Mr. Faircloth stated that he desired to see the zoning error corrected to EC-5 but if the problem continues he will ask the tenants to vacate the garage. 2 . LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENTS a. Inventory of Sites of Cultural and Geological Significance Presentation was made by Planner Brad Torgan. This agenda item is to receive public comment on proposed text amendments to the Land Use Plan. Orange County contains many sites of cultural, historical, recreational, biological and geological significance. Section IV-B-2, Land Suitability , of the Subdivision Regulations contains a mandate to the Planning Board to consider the overall design of a subdivision in light of the suitability of the land for development. Land suitability includes an investigation of historic sites and unique natural areas. Although information has been available through a variety of local and State agencies, it has never been compiled in one source, making it difficult for the Planning Department and the Planning Board to adequately assess the impact of subdivision proposals on such resources. Furthermore, similar mandates are not present in the Zoning Ordinance. In May of 1986, an inventory of cultural, historical, recreational, immmm 10 biological and geological significance was completed. Incorporation of the document into the Land Use Plan represents an important first step in insuring the protection and/or preservation of significant natural and cultural resources. If approved, specific mechanisms such as incentive zoning, density transfers and cluster development can be developed and/or utilized through which to achieve this goal. In addition, public and private agencies and organizations can be contacted for assistance in maintaining and managing significant areas. As development pressures mount in Orange County, protection of sensitive areas becomes even more critical than in the past. A stable and varied natural environment, along with an appreciation of historical, cultural, and community resources are essential to a healthy society. Current development patterns in the triangle suggest that the natural environment is part of the high quality of life which attracts new development and residents. !u The County has already stated some commitment to the protection of significant natural resources through policy statements and the identification of some natural areas in the Land Use Plan, Floodway and Streamway Building Regulations, and Public Interest District Zoning. In the face of rapid growth, however, commitment to protection, and the potential levels of protection need to be expanded. Current definitions of sites significant to the natural and physical environment, along with rationales for protection, are deficient when confronted by a doubling of the County's population in the next 20-30 years. Additionally no comprehensive data base of sites important to the natural and physical environment exists. This proposed text amendment and accompanying appendix are designed to remedy that situation. Currently, the Land Use Plan speaks primarily to the protection of large public and quasi-public holdings such as Eno River State Park and Duke Forest. A recognition of the need for protection on large private holdings or small sites of biological significance is much less evident, even though the Triangle Land Conservancy and N.C. Natural Heritage Program have identified over two dozen such sites in Orange County that are home to endangered or threatened species and exemplary geologic formations. The County also has no record of private lands placed in reserve for wildlife generation (such as wildlife renew areas or the Continental Timberlands site in Bingham Township) or passive recreation (such as hiking trails in the Morgan Creek easements) . As for man-made additions to the environment, the Land Use Plan speaks only to the protection of state or federally registered historic buildings and archeological sites, ignoring literally hundreds of other sites important to the history and culture of Orange County. Cemeteries, which as a group are currently unrecognized in the Land Use Plan, offer a wealth of historical data on county resident and early history. For early county residents it may be the only record as vital records registration was not mandated until this century. State law offers some protection from desecration but the laws cannot be enforced if locations are not recorded. The intent of establishing cemeteries in the Land Use Plan as historically significant sites is not to preserve them at all costs. Rather, it seeks to prevent past abuses, the using of gravesites as in 11 dumping g grounds for building construction or plowing under without recordation of the site. It asks that the integrity of the County's cemeteries, many of which date back to the 1700 's be respected and, if authority of law exists to disinter, that its data be fully recorded. Sites of historical significance is also broadened to encompass more than buildings and cemeteries. It includes dams, functional or destroyed but still evident, at mill sites that once provided for the economic well-being of the County. It also includes sites of commemorative markers either placed by the state (such as that identifying the site of the hanging of the regulator leaders) or by private citizens, such as that memorializing the site of the old Elm Grove School in northern Chapel Hill Township. Churches and rural community centers, including recreational sites, should be acknowledged in the Land Use Plan as important to the County and its planning process. Their existence imparts a cohesion and identity to rural communities. Even though the church buildings may be new and not of historical value, the same is not true of the communities and congregation, some of which have already celebrated their bicentennial. The majority of material within the appendix was taken from current registries provided by state agencies including the Division of Archives and History and Archeology branch of the Department of Cultural Resources, the N.C. Wildlife Commission, and the N.C. Natural Heritage Program. The inclusion of other data, especially that concerning cemeteries and mill sites, required extensive fieldwork and relied upon every available source for clues, from 90 year old maps and minutes of Baptist Association meetings to handwritten fieldnotes of members on the Chapel Hill Historical Society which are on file in the Registrar of Deeds Office. One note as to entries--the entries for archeological sites are as cryptic as they are because the Archeology Branch has asked that they be presented that way. Although complete data on sites, including location, is now on file in the Planning Department, there is a fear that public disclosure of exact locations will invite disruption of the sites. New measures of protection that may arise from this work will depend entirely on whether any new protection beyond the status quo is warranted. Potential measures could range from Zoning Ordinance amendments to simply informing a state agency responsible for a particular site's protection that development is proposed for that site to no new measures at all. What new measures or simply new awareness that might arise from this work stems from its basic premise, Orange County's natural heritage should not be compromised, its cultural heritage not forgotten. Planning Staff recommends approval of amendment to the text and incorporation of inventory as appendix to the Land Use Plan. Commissioner Marshall noted this was an impressive study and one which was needed but questioned, under the religious area of the study, if Black Baptist was a specific denomination. Torgan responded that the document he had to work with was the Orange County Directory which was put together in 1952 and that directory made the distinction between White Southern Baptist Churches and Black Baptist Churhes. Marshall suggested that this not be listed as if it were 12 a denomination. Planning Board member Hubbard inquired if this were a final inventory or if it were to be updated periodically. Torgan responded it would be updated as more information becomes available. Commissioner Walker stated that a study had been done fairly recently and that a copy of this study should help considerably. Jo Barbour indicated that a Mrs. Ingstrom had information that should be incorporated in the study. Torgan responded that those notes prepared by Mrs. Ingstrom are reportedly missing. Pearson Stewart, Triangle Land Conservancy, encouraged the Boards to amend the Land Use Plan to include this inventory and supported the suggestion to continually update the inventory as more information becomes available. 3. ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENTS a. Article 10 Off-Street Parking and Loading The presentation was made by Marvin Collins. No requirement exists in the Zoning Ordinance for the provision of handicapped parking facilities. such facilities are currently provided through the attachment of conditions of approval on subdivision plats, planned developments and special use permits, or through the application of the NC State Building Code requirements. The proposed ordinance amendments would require handicapped parking spaces to be a minimum of 13 feet in width and 20 feet in length. A minimum of two (2) handicapped spaces or one (1) for every 20 standard parking spaces would be required. Spaces must be clearly marked for handicapped use and must be within 100 feet of a building entrance. Curb cuts or ramps must also be provided for each space for access to adjoining walkways. The NC State Building Code currently requires one (1) handicapped parking space in each 50 standard spaces but recommends twice that amount. Planning Staff recommends approval of the amendment. There were no comments or questions. 4. SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AMENDMENTS a. Section III-E Final Plat - Map Sheet Dimensions The presentation was made by Collins. This agenda item is to receive public comment on proposed text amendments to the Subdivision Regulations. limmm Changes have occurred in the North Carolina Uniform Plat Law which establish minimum and maximum dimensions for subdivision plats - no smaller than 8-1/2"x11" or greater than 21"x30". Margin dimensions are also established - 1-1/2" on the left border and 1/2" on all other borders. The current Subdivision Regulations allow either (a) 21"x30", (b) 12"x18" or (c) 18"x24" plat sizes. The amendment would eliminate confusion between the regulations/requirements administered by the Planning Department and the Register of Deeds and Land Records Departments. The Planning Board recommends approval of amendment. There were no comments or questions. 5. INSPECTION FEE SCHEDULE The presentation was made by Collins. This agenda item is to receive public comment on proposed amendments to the Inspection Fee Schedule. On July 8, 1986, an updated schedule of fees for planning, erosion control and building inspection services was adopted by the Board of Commissioners. Since adoption of the schedule, it has become apparent that revisions are necessary to clarify certain fees and other "miscellaneous" schedules which were not foreseen earlier. The proposed amendments would clarify the application of fees to certain types of construction and plan review/approval procedures. In addition, the provision regarding "Late Fees" would be incorporated again, and all schedules containing fees ending in $.50 would be rounded off to be consistent with the computerized permit system program. The proposed amendments would also add fees for various "miscel- laneous" inspections such as the moving and demolition of buildings, commercial and campaign signs, swimming pools and radio/TV towers. Fees would also be established to provide for the reimbursement of Town of Chapel Hill Engineering Staff inspecting streets, storm drainage, and water and sewer facilities constructed to Town standards. Commissioner Carey inquired about the "Change of Occupancy/Use (Existing Building) ". Collins responded this item is related to a requirement in the North Carolina State Building Code where different classes of occupancy are defined such as retail, office, etc. Carey noted the need for clarification and Collins agreed that this could be changed to read "Change in Class of Occupancy". Commissioner Lloyd asked for clarification on campaign signs and inquired how it could be enforced. Collins responded that the present Sign Ordinance allows campaign signs and specifies locations and sizes of the signs. 14 Marvin Collins explained that there has been no real effort, until recently, to enforce campaign sign provisions. When the current fee schedule was adopted by the Board in July, no fees were listed for campaign signs or other identification signs. What is proposed is that a fee be charged per candidate requiring the identification of each sign by tax map, lot and block number. The signs also have to be located on private property instead of DOT or any public or private right-of-way. Commissioner Marshall noted the County should not do something that is not enforceable. Commissioner Lloyd expressed disagreement with the entire concept of paying a fee before campaign signs can be put in place. Planning Board member Sharlene Pilkey asked if the municipalities fine people if the signs are not taken down within a certain period of time, and Collins indicated that it varies in accordance with the ordinance in these municipalities. Steve Yuhasz asked about the charge per acre in the erosion fee schedule and if this charge per acre is per disturbed acre, and Collins indicated it was. Yuhasz questioned the enforceability of a number of fees on the schedule. Collins noted that while some of the fees would be difficult to enforce they are set up to be self-policing. Collins made two corrections to the fee schedule: (1) the fee for prefab utility building apply to those over 500 square feet. (2) under signs - delete, in the section dealing with business identification and billboards involving construction, the word "not" before the word "involving" . Collins clarified that a demolition permit is essential when utility systems serving a building must be disconnected. One reason for the inspection is to insure they are disconnected correctly. With reference to woodstoves, the inspection would take place if a woodstove is added to an existing house. Normally, most insurance companies require that if a person has a fireplace or woodstove installed, the installation be inspected by the building inspector to certify it has been installed properly. In an answer to a question from the audience about fees in the Joint Planning Area, Collins indicated that the County can either perform the inspection by using County staff, hire a consultant or contract with the municipalities to do the inspections. Commissioner Lloyd requested that this item be continued to the first meeting in November for receipt of additional citizen comments. Josephine Barbour made comments about the size regulations for campaign signs and expressed disapproval of charging a fee for such activity. She asked that the sign regulations pertaining to campaign signs be reviewed. 6. FIRE DISTRICT BOUNDARY CHANGE Director of EMS Bobby Baker presented for consideration of approval the request for removal of a portion of the White Cross Fire District adding it to the South Orange Area District. All state requirements which provide for changes in fire districts have been met. NO ONE SPOKE IN OPPOSITION TO THIS CHANGE. THERE BEING NO FURTHER COMMENTS, THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to refer public hearing items one through four to the Planning Board for their recommendation and continue the public hearing on these items to November 3, 1986 for receipt of the Planning Board recommendation. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner Carey to continue the public hearing on the Inspection Fee Schedule to November 3 for receipt of additional citizen comments. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to approve the change in fire district boundaries for the White Cross Fire District and the South Orange Area District. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. E. REPORTS 1. AUDIT REPORT 1985-86 Finance Director Gordon Baker made introductory remarks about the 1985-86 audit report and introduced Rex Price and Deborah Sackie, the auditors from Touche Ross & Company. They indicated that the audit went smoothly. The report is long and has a lot of detailed information. There were no questions. 2. TEEN NETWORKING TEAM Michelle Cotton presented information about TNT and outlined overall goals of the group in an effort to postpone young parenthood, encourage teens to finish their education and to help prepare teens for and help them find suitable and satisfying employment. She emphasized that the problems of teenagers need the attention of all the citizens of Orange County. She referred to the problem as a plague that will grow if something is not done. Russell Dula, the second speaker for TNT, explained Fall Teen Fest in which teens would be brought together and involved in a talent show as well as a fashion show. By supporting this Fall Teen Fest the citizens of Orange County can express to the teens in Orange County that they are concerned about their problems and willing to help reduce them. He explained the program and associated costs of $950. 00. TNT hopes to continue with smaller projects and group meetings where teen problems can be discussed. They hope to find ways to instill a more positive attitude in teens and encourage them to become involved with the community and helping others. Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to fund the request of $950. 00 and encourage the County Departments to assist with the program as possible. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. A. BOARD COMMENTS Chair Willhoit announced a joint meeting with the Town of Hillsborough to discuss (1) the thoroughfare plan, (2) water and sewer plan, and (3) development south of Hillsborough. The meeting will be held on October 27 in Hillsborough. B. AUDIENCE COMMENTS 1. MATTERS ON THE PRINTED AGENDA None. 2. MATTERS NOT ON THE PRINTED AGENDA Mark N. O'Neal, Co-trustee Matthews Trust, made reference to a 150 acre track located on Mt. Sinai Road and noted that the proposed zoning change which increases the lot size from 40, 000 square feet to 80, 000 square feet be waived because of a hardship on the family. He emphasized that the zoning regulation is not needed because the topography of the land will limit most lots to 2-5 acres. He requested . an exemption from this 16 proposed zoning. Chair Willhoit referred this request to the County Manager for further study. POLICY A motion was made by Chair Willhoit, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to reaffirm the policy that any previous applications that had received preliminary plan approval as of the effective date of the adoption of the revised Land Use Plan should proceed under the review and development procedures of the regulations in effect at the time the application was received. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. C. PROCLAMATION FOR NATIONAL EMPLOY THE HANDICAPPED WEEK Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Carey to adopt the proclamation for National Employ the Handicapped Week. F VOTE: UNANIMOUS. PROCLAMATION NATIONAL EMPLOY THE HANDICAPPED WEEK WHEREAS, physically and mentally disabled people have been tireless in seeking out employment opportunities and in overcoming vocational, economic, educational and additional barriers; and WHEREAS, disabled people have demonstrated to their employers and their community high standards of performance and dedication to their professions; and WHEREAS, disabled people aspire to equality in the work force, self direction and self-determination in their lifestyle; and WHEREAS, employers, both public and private, can and do readily testify to the credentials and value of disabled employees; and WHEREAS, everyone has the right to employment at the highest levels of which they are capable and this right is not to be abridged by reason of physical or mental disability; and WHEREAS, despite past and present efforts of employers to hire people with disabilities, the unemployment level of disabled people continues to be unnecessarily high; NOW, THEREFORE, the Orange County Board of Commissioners do hereby proclaim the week of October 5-11, 1986 as NATIONAL EMPLOY THE HANDICAPPED WEEK in Orange County and urge public and private employers to take this opportunity to determine how the employment skills and the employment needs of disabled persons can best be utilized to further the public/private good. F. ITEMS FOR DECISION - CONSENT AGENDA The County Manager recommended the following action by the Board: 1. ADDITION TO STATE ROAD SYSTEM To approve a petition for addition of Governor Burke Road in Wilkerson Acres Subdivision - Section II and Section III to the state maintained secondary roads system. 2. CHANGE ORDER FOR CARR BUILDING 17 To approve a change order for the Carr Building to permit the removal of tile which is one inch higher than the existing floor at a cost of $334. 00 and authorize the Chair to sign. 3 . APPRAISAL SERVICES CONTRACT To award an appraisal services contract to Kathy Buck at a total not to exceed $5,000 and authorize the Chair to sign. (Efland Sewer Contract) Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Marshall that the forgoing action be taken by the Board. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. NOTE: The next item was removed from the consent agenda for separate consideration. 4. PROPOSED BUDGET AMENDMENTS Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to amend the 1986-87 Budget Ordinance by the following General Fund amendments: Appropriation - Aging $ 20,680 Source-CAT Transp. Lease Fees 20, 680 Appropriation - Aging 5,500 Source - State Discretionary Funds 5,500 Appropriation - Health 5,000 Source - governor's Waste Management 5, 000 Appropriation - Social Services 5,098 Source - Emergency Food and Shelter 5, 098 Appropriation - Agricultural Extension Department 10,811 Source - Special Agricultural Extension Contingency Account 10,811 VOTE: UNANIMOUS. G. ITEMS FOR DECISION 1. INSPECTION FEE SCHEDULE No decision on this item because the public hearing was continued to November 3, 1986 for additional citizen comments. 2. FIRE DISTRICT BOUNDARY CHANGE Decision was made above in item D-6. 3. SUNSET RIDGE - PRELIMINARY PLAN The Preliminary Plan for Sunset Ridge Subdivision was presented for consideration of approval. The property is located in Cheeks Township along the south side of West Lebanon Road (SR 1306) between Mill Creek Road and Doe Run Road. Fourteen lots are proposed out of 14.76 acres. The property is zoned Rural Residential and is designated Rural Residential in the Land Use Plan. The Planning Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan subject to the lot lines being shifted to obtain the minimum road frontage required for lot #3 . The Planning Board recommended approval subject to the Planning Staff recommendation and the condition that all lots get access from Sundown Drive. Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to approve the Planning Board recommendation. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 4. PROPERTY SURVEYED FOR ANTHONY RICHARDS - PRELIMINARY PLAN The Preliminary Plan for the property of Annie Belle Richards was presented for consideration of approval. The property is located in rmilm Cheeks Township on the east side of Frazier Road (SR 1310) . One lot is proposed out of 15.4601 acres with a lot size of 1.229 acres. The zoning of the property is Rural Residential with an overlay zoning designation of . Upper Eno Protected Watershed. The Planning Board recommended approval of the Preliminary Plan on September 15, 1986. Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve the Planning Board recommendation. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 5. GRAMPIAN HILLS - SECTION THREE - PRELIMINARY PLAN The Preliminary Plan for Grampian Hills, Section Three Subdivision, property of Mrs. Y. Z. Cannon was presented for consideration of approval. The property is located in Chapel Hill Township on the south side of Bowden Road (SR 1946) . Two lots are proposed out of 4.54 acres. the zoning of the property is Rural Residential with an overlay zoning designation of University Lake Protected Watershed. The Planning Board recommended approval of the Preliminary Plan contingent upon two conditions: (1) Indicate the tax map and lot references on the plat. (2) The spelling of Grampian must be changed to provide con- sistency for all three sections. Harold Cannon asked that consideration be given for permitting two driveways instead of a joint driveway. Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to approve the Planning Board recommendation with the two conditions as stipulated and to allow separate driveways. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 6. REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO INITIATE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Carey to authorize the County Attorney to initiate legal al proceedings for a zoning violation on property owned by Charles and Marilyn McLamb to bring the property owner into compliance with the Orange County Zoning Ordinance. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 7. CABLECASTING BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MEETINGS Ken Thompson presented a overview summary of the benefits and costs for cablecasting the Board of Commissioners, meetings. Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to request The Village Companies hold open their offer until July, 1987. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 9. CONTRACT PROPOSAL TO STUDY AND EVALUATE ADDITIONAL WATER SUPPLY IN ORANGE COUNTY Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve a contract proposal from Hazel and Sawyer to conduct a water supply development feasibility study in Orange County at at cost of $40, 000 for phase I and $20, 000 for phase 2 . VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 8. SCHEDULE OF VALUES, STANDARDS AND RULES After a short explanation from Kermit Lloyd and questions which were satisfactorily answered, motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve the schedule of values as submitted by the Tax Supervisor and authorize that the schedule of values be held open in the office of the Tax Supervisor for ten days from the date of publication upon which time the schedule of values will become official unless appealed. rimmm ‘7 VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 10. DRAINAGE EASEMENT BY TOWN OF CARRBORO 19 Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to approve a request from the Town of Carrboro for a drainage and curb easement across a lot located at the intersection of Broad and Hill Streets. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 11. TAX REFUNDS AND RELEASE REQUEST Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve 10 requests for refund and/or release of tax bills. Zinn Group, Acct. #99298 $ 1,087.47 Ray W. Queen, Acct. #60914 252. 60 Larry E. Squires, Acct. #5007 6. 05 Estate of Enita Stokes, Acct. #104677 1, 105.17 Liesch, Herman R. & Doris M. , Acct. #727302 603 .34 Liesch, Herman R. & Doris M. , Acct. #727320 195.31 Tarheel Dining Concepts, Inc. , Acct. #96275 206.85 J & E, Inc. Acct. #37380 992.66 Larry W. Melton, Acct. #11916 428. 60 John Lewis Bradshaw, Acct. #102708 37.62 VOTE: UNANIMOUS. H. APPOINTMENTS COMMISSION FOR WOMEN Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Carey to appoint V. Kay Scurlock and Loretta T. Coble. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. PRIVATE INDUSTRIAL COUNCIL Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Carey to reappoint Phyllis Lotchin and Irving P. Nach. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. SECONDARY ROAD IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Carey to appoint James Edwards. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. CHAPEL HILL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to appoint Kenneth Bagwell as an alternate on the Chapel Hill Board of Adjustment. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. I. MINUTES Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve the minutes of the September 16, 1986 meeting as corrected. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. ADJOURNMENT With no further business to come before the Board, Chair Willhoit adjourned the meeting. The next meeting will be held on Monday, October 6, 1986 at 7: 30 p.m. in Superior Courtroom, Hillsborough, North Carolina. Beverly A. Blythe, Clerk Don Willhoit, Chair Joanna Bradshaw, Admin. Secretary