Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda - 09-02-1986
• .w. ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AGENDA REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 7:30 P.M. COMMISSIONERS ROOM HILLSBOROUGH, N.C. A. BOARD COMMENTS B. AUDIENCE COMMENTS 1. Matters on the Printed Agenda 2 . Matters not on the Printed Agenda C. APPOINTMENTS D. MINUTES E. RESOLUTIONS OF APPRECIATION 1. John Gastineau 2 . Gordon R. Baker and Employees of the Orange County Finance Department Upon Award of Financial Reporting Achievement PAGE # F. ITEMS FOR DECISION 007 1. Partial Width R/W - Gene & Brenda Ray Minor Subdivision 016 2 . PD-2-86 Heartwood at Blackwood Mountain 088 3 . Lake Hogan Lane--Preliminary Plan 101 4 . Mel-Oak Phase II (Addition of Lot 23) --Preliminary 108 5. Delvin Woods--Preliminary 120 6. Manor Hill Subdivision (Phase II) --Preliminary 133 7. Acres of New Hope: Division of Lot #1 of Section 5 Preliminary Plan 141 8. Moreland--Preliminary Plan 152 9. Pine Forest--Preliminary Plan 161 10. Red Hill Estate--Preliminary 170 11. Time Extension--Animal Shelter 178 12 . Change Order for Holt Construction--Animal Shelter 182 13 . Change Order for ACME Plumbing and Heating--Animal Shelter G. ADJOURNMENT J ' o = r 001 ORANGE COUNTY Action Agenda BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Item No. C ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT METING DATE September 2, 1986 Subject: APPOINTMENTS IDepartment: BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS I I Public Hearing: Yes X no I Attachments: Information Contact: Beverly A. Blythe Under Separate Cover Phone Numbers: 732--8181, 968-4501, 227-0231 PURPOSE: To maintain membership at effective levels on Commissioners' appointed Boards. The following vacancy is announced for the first time only: A-14 -SECONDARY ROAD IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE - 1 vacancy (resignation of Vance Thompson) The following vacancies are announced together with the indication of the status of securing candidates for possible appointment consideration. A-4- COMMISSION FOR WOMEN - 2 vacancies - no recommendation has been received. A-13 - RECREATION AND PARKS ADVISORY COUNCIL - 2 vacancies; no recommendation has been received. B-5 - DOMICILIARY HOME C MMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE - 1 vacancy; no recommendation has been received. B-14 - ARTS COMMISSION - 1 vacancy; no recommendation has been received. C-7 - ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT- 2 vacancies - 1 full member and 1 alternate. One (1) new resume is submitted for your consideration. RECOMMENDATION: the Board decides. 002 ORANGE COUNTY Action Agenda BOARD OF COMNIISSIONERS it Ho. ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT MEETING DATE September 2, 1986 I Subject: MINUTES 1 Department: BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS f 1 Public Hearing: Yes X no I Attachments: Information Contact: Beverly A. Blythe Under Separate Cover Phone Numbers: 732-8181, 968-1+501, 221-0231 PURPOSE: To correct and/or approve the minutes as submitted for consideration: June 19, 1986 Budget Public Hearing July 8, 1986 Continued Meeting from 7/7 July 10, 1986 Continued Meeting from 7/8 July 10, 1986 (4:00) Special Meeting July 23, 1986 Regular Meeting July 29, 1986 Special Meeting August 4, 1986 Regular Meeting August 19, 1986 Regular Meeting August 25, 1986 Joint Quarterly Public Hearing NEED: Approval so the minutes may be entered into the official minute book in the Clerk's office. • RECOMMENDATION: As the Board decides. 003 RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR JOHN GASTINEAU WHEREAS, JOHN GASTINEAU participated in discussions which led to the formation of the Orange County Economic Development Commission and has subsequently served on the Commission since 1983 ; and WHEREAS, JOHN GASTINEAU has served as Chairman of the Orange County Economic Development Commission since 1983 ; and WHEREAS, JOHN GASTINEAU has given freely and unselfishly of his time, talents, energy and leadership from the creation of the Economic Development Commission in 1982 , through its formative first three years; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Orange County Board of Commissioners, through its members, Don Willhoit, Shirley Marshall, Moses Carey, Ben Lloyd and Norman Walker, does hereby express its sincere appreciation to JOHN GASTINEAU for his economic development efforts on behalf of the people of Orange County. THIS, the 19th day of August, 1986. Don Willhoit, Chair Shirley Marshall Moses Carey Ben Lloyd Norman Walker ORANGE COUNTY 004 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agenda Item No. EA ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: SEPTEMBER 2 , 1986 SUBJECT: PRESENTATION--CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT FOR EXCELLENCE IN FINANCIAL REPORTING DEPARTMENT: COUNTY MANAGER PUBLIC HEARING: Yes X No ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: MANAGER'S OFFICE,X501 PLAQUE (TO BE PRESENTED) TELEPHONE NUMBER: CERTIFICATE Hillsborough - 732-8181 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 Mebane - 227-2031 Durham - 688-7331 PURPOSE: To acknowledge receipt of this Certificate of Achievement and recognize the individuals responsible for its having been earned. The Certificate of Achievement recognizes excellence in governmental financial reporting. It was begun by the Munici- pal Finance Officers Association in 1945 to emphasize the importance of the need for every governmental unit to prepare and publish an easily readable and understandable Comprehen- sive Annual Financial Report. The Certificate of Conformance is generally acknowledged as the highest form of recognition in the area of governmental accounting and financial reporting and its attainment represents a significant accomplishment by an entity and its management. The benefits of obtaining the Certificate are: 1. Comparability: Reports qualifying for Certificates employ standardized terminology and formatting conventions, and facilitate comparisons from one year to the next and among different entities. 2 . Completeness: The financial statements, supporting sche- dules, statistical tables, and narrative explanations required for a Certificate help to assure that all fiscal data are presented that are needed by the many persons and groups having interest in the financial affairs of Orange County. 3 . Clarity: The report is to be free of ambiguities and misleading inferences. 4 . Bond Marketing Aid: Reports qualifying for a Certificate of Achievement provide a detailed vehicle by which market analysts, investors, potential investors and others may assess the relative attractiveness of a government's securities compared to alternative investment possibili- ties. 005 When a Certificate of Achievement is awarded to a government, an Award of Financial Reporting Achievement is also presented to the individual designated by the government as primarily responsible for its having earned the Certificate. This award is presented to Finance Director, Gordon R. Baker and the Finance Department staff. Presentation of the program awards will be by Charles W. Pittman, III, Finance Director for the City of Wilson. Mr. Pittman is the State Representative for the Government Finance Officers Association of the U. S. and Canada. . . . . .. : . .. . 00€ • • NEWS RELEASE GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION RE: ORANGE COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICE& Is Awarded 180 NORTH MICHIGAN AVENUE SU!E 800 HIGI-IEST AWARD IN FINANCIAL REPORTING 31H±AGO,,II ILLINOIS (Chicago) --The Certificate of Achievement- for Excellence in Financial Reporting has been awarded to: ORANGE COUNTY by the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) for its comprehensive annual financial report (CAFR) . The Certificate of Achievement is the highest form of recognition in the area of governmental accounting and financial reporting , and its attainment represents a significant accomplishment . When a Certificate of Achievement is awarded to a government, an Award of Financial Reporting Achievement also is given to the individual designated as primarily responsible. for its having earned the certificate . This Award of Financial Reporting Achievement has been presented to: GORDON R. BAKER, FINANCE DIRECTOR • The CAFR has been judged by an impartial panel to Meet the high standards of the program including demonstrating a constructive "spirit of full disclosure" effort to clearly communicate . its financial story and motivate potential persons and user groups to read the CAFR. The GFOA is a nonprofit professional association serving 9,500 government finance professionals . The association produces • a variety of technical publications in various fields of governmental finance, and represents the public finance community in Washington, D .C. The association provides numerous training opportunities, • and conducts an 1.i i a l conference a t i . ..�_ e G by 4, 500 p bl na e p ofes S ional ti For mc,r..'e info nal= on ,_ contact Free] Lantz at 312/ 977-9700 . /! ORANGE C O U N T Y OO j BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date Septen er__22_1986 Action A nda Item SUBJECT: Partial Width R/W - Gene & Brenda Ray Minor Subdivision DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes X _ No Attachment( s) Information. Contact: Janet Rigsbee Partial Width R/W Checklist Photographs Application Tax Map Recorded Survey Letter from Applicant Soil Analysis Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 PURPOSE: To consider a request for a partial width right-of-way of 30 feet for a distance of approximately 100 feet to serve a one lot minor subdivision on a lot known as Bingham Township Map 5 Lots 14C & 14H (the Gene & Brenda Ray Subdivision ) . NEED: The Ray 's propose to create one new lot to be served by a Class C road . A partial width right-of-way is needed because there is an existing dwelling that could not meet the required 20 foot setback . The Ray 's cannot acquire additional footage or alternative access from the neighboring lots . This is the last subdivision of this . lot as the soil is only suitable for 3 dwellings. IMPACT: A minor subdivision of one lot for their son would be possible. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Board recommends approval . 008 GENE & BRENDA RAY MINOR SUBDIVISION PARTIAL WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY CHECKLIST • (Adapted from Orange County Subdivision Regulations Section IV-S-3-c-2) NATURE OF SUBDIVISION: - Topography —flat & gently rolling Surrounding area - single family residences Present road - existing 81 wide gravel driveway with close proximity to Kimbro Road (see plat) Future Road Plans - Class C Private road - Access by public safety vehicles - topography good, • driveway existing, cul-de-sac to be constructed, - pull-offs provided along road and road built to Orange County 's Class C private road standards. CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD: Driveway needs more gravel and needs to be extended ending in a cul-de-sac before a Class C road will be approved . RIGHT-OF- 'AY WIDTH: 50 feet wide with a length of apprmxi- . mately 100 feet 30 feet wide is proposed. Fire District is Orange Grove Fire District - Road will be built with a cul-de-sac and pull-outs along the edge of the constructed , travelway. The largest emergency vehicles in the Orange Grove Fire Department could use the private road after it is constructed to Class C standards. CONDITIONS: - Pre-existing conditions preclude the provision of a full right-of-way due to the pattern of adjacent development and the presence of an existing single family dwelling. Adjacent lots will not grant additional right-of- way or allow access by a new right-of-way. •. ................ 14 f rie113 Re, R.D --... -- _ - - - 009 - . . - • . _ ) ,,,-.!.. re:-- ::-f!',-,- ..t.,. r--,c. --;;;;,+" ,-:-,, I_ • . ... . . _,__, _ it. ...,., ....0i,.., ...,.....,_..,,,__,.,..,-__. ,.-,2-4,- .i)Lx, _ - 4.:'•-, i.:...., . - -- -Y.--. -..i..-----.',---;14 t-.---- •r -J.i...,4".1,...7•2.'''.4' I - • - b. •'....-'-•••-'w-':',-,-,.... -'•'- -'-- '•*.7.4:' ;• • -;,'7 I.;.,.•:V,t7_,;f712,- - ' • '---.L.- -"--;;:- 1,-_,7^',,.::;-_ :■--7,'-`:-4,:•-•C•-ti;•••4;4•,';',•:-.4-?'--..-- •••,--t.:''-' - .,•rift- t.-:,r-R-_ -- • . 1..,_, r•,c,x,,,,, , • • • - - - • .. , - .. n _^.•,,i. . •" -. '',.../....-•'',.. •-•I. --t.",• '-'4.• 1.4 r -r•C.1,. --‘-IML" -r' -- .a .:144'' ' . - ' 1-..-s.-, ,-.--. 1..-0- ...,--- .... • •-...- -- -1. -..•-.1'.7-‘,.--.7-,.,:- -..,'"r‘eol,'".....`,.-, . ,,,,,,!•t',I. '1 _ •tt% 4±,4 *r• 4:••''';']-•=. -12-•-'-i.1.,,itr:_'...4 ' l• ''•"'•-•- -"i--1. --',4-7,'F'-‘,..-;;•:4',-k]•••,•=•- .-'-liz,IC,ct."1.,-,,-- A TiA •_4-1-'-. .....':I• / SC•4”4 • ,••-•- •••••••-'- ---7'..".."•-•=Z., • -d - '44- -,,,r•••&-J.Th,;,r. _:4.---,.C.41.4i," 4 :"' ,„ _ 4';" ,.'' •'4":1:••-••,••• •;n. --,::.`-.1074..kt"4- 1-1,'''''''4--- -:•L:4--..."'7.-1- •-..---- i-'6-= - -i',1:-"..ir".-, ---,`'.'4, i .;141--"-r''-,';r,--L-i-'.:;';"12-'---;.,,,, .,:;-. ' -'"r- .67-;--,-''''--"-...."-=-tt--r- t•- r..''' ;,%,'.',..--,-,' '.i"-"••',-..-4'i'-`4".■--t tist:-.r=''''''..r:-'- .,_-_..,-',, --- - r.' -,.. ''_.:,,,-;'Tv: 1' f„„ ■-... "_"'-''- . _ ,. 1 , ...-.....c...,_,_.,. -." .r i.,,i,-TT. ....,_..— -4.-+,,_6..„. ......-i.-.. .; .- . ..•■••--.. -pi:.• _ -- • .K r_':,- ---.7.-. .. --': , - :r•:-.rr: _.__,....... -.10.,• ' -A, .. -•-`-,..,,,-..4.:::zr_..,..--_-,--1-.-.sz,,,,,-,,,:,-„1.-.-....L.A.,-.-.-.. ....- . - '4-*----- ' ..;•-•-•-' •-'-."- ,,.... -...- - z---• '1.---------7:-:;Thr47-_,4.-L- 1*.tZ..,"-- . -,,-.,,,;44--.•----,-,-.1:6-,:-.4,reo,-_ ,i,-.. .., -_ ,-;,,,,-.., , .4.,...--.-...;_-,_ .---., :::-..z., - ._ -__..--.,4---,6-ta-,---,i-T,77. ,•74Z,..7_.: _.- .774,-4, . -. -4-,:ializrr"- -',.,0i..",`-_.s.-'''r-,-''''izi"._ -'1,--": -.4-- -4,, --• --44-.T . .., Z.4-4. ' ''.'--'-AiZ3.-.7.-•''44-4'.'Ziet•%-•"Ii•. - - !,_ g:r......,_...-S-1,-,‘„0.7_,.-..--,A,PL2.5-_--+Z_,,,„_••-^'...t„-'"''-';•* •••-, -, Xf•jt.,..k-4:44:4_1›.i•F":-.1.c.,:,,1-1.-45-',,eL •,.;..4-..-r .,4•1sAA'A•v,■-;:•;,:tfid4k,oe•-y,attt•;,: - _ - -.=- • • k •-.1.7....- '1A;Z,V•;;;.,.. 4. .3-,:,, ,,..-..,-,,AS,.., 3 -.' ' .r,-_,--V,_\,- e -- ........-1.---i,--_,-, •,.....,to.---4,-,e.-- ..:,-.-7,-,&1-.,,g-,47$.4 ,', ,- -..:-. -'1'<-- At; •.*-' -;7.---,;-.:-7-.- ' ;A'-':-.4:'142.--":•••.4-Ir-i.,-•'-",,=7••C-.-1--, --- ..tr_c;;,-F• .••• -•••-At'P•11;. :,-;•.: • ,- ,--f,'_:, ..■ •••••4-.‘T•e•,-,.'- -...-'-- .-e ••_4- . - -- -'7.--t-,...-r7;..r;:.,''.:!"- 4, -, . -----^-1-44'ri-- .f. Rif.-,-t4: --....-,--.__ :-. -._.,• zi., .ti,..... •.:3-,..-.-P.-...„ .,..4....-x-r, ..014.vve, .4iicz„..,,..,...rti.,.., . _.....k,,,,,- ,...„.1 , , ,o_.....„1„,--/,-„.„--4... ..„4,...,_.---:., -.4 ..,-'2"44 *-.. --"_ .--4.:i.. ...- _ -'.-t.f.-4-,-....r..- - -.-''''!..''',---:- 41- ' --t'lk--;1...•-r- --• -r.`..2".;,..vv-;'c--1,... ■0-- --$3.-•-■:',?".7.--'''.--2W--2,- -. .24...4. --,....-:_.:*F.1-, •i- _-_.------ :-.--. ---___,;;:iyikoifil .... - -.:-"-__-,,,, _ •, :-...., .r --.....;,..-...,-;,--r,t--_ • ss,---, ,,. -1-0 PROPOSED e.4-04-SS C ROA B E A/ 7-/?..A tUC-C"" ... _...._ *..4--. ; - • -,-4044.-itRuF4f-,--. . ---•4 4-th t.'-'r-X 9-,- _..14. ,), , ,;. .,,-: ' '4.,,,t•:-■•-•,?;-,-"1 '''- i ';^ i#* ,i-r•'- ::- -, 'r-, 71 ..,--..r .1.4 0:1,-„,1.,.-,1.1,-,*,,`•:,:-:15.112101$_`-,o- - .1"p7.,..1"".1`-11-.7-g,„c,*;;X.-,_s„7.g, • g-.... .,r, .---;-+- fL*Ira ..ciri;,_ -ar.•"-.s---..t..,11.t---ztir:Vi.E...,111.1;:r:'71-,1,-;01.4e.-td:...."--r . t .,;,:-_jk-27;:":4,?.4,1--Irtz•-,„- ,7,=_Ii-.:1,"_=7.!:;.di-t*, ,,:(t~i'r44-i;2-;:it'ai.,ii---_ Fi 0 S E , Nv.:.,,-,,,.‹,,,,..-:,_, -.."..",■,*7,.1;:ta-D.-,:q1-_.11- .-,:t r. ::-1.;4",4 4147-,rstgiouyVit,t,,,, 'i..: ,-,-,:,,,---4.-,4;;-,.---2p,',..11--.-,-C-_-I-:Air--1-i 1 e- - -12.•?-:;-anr4,. ..`--,•••• ,.- , ----,7;...4-.,-.?...,..-,,..r i......;.1.,f..,,,.."--.r,-er =Z a ik%,...t•':1L'. '74ff-V.--7.4'-'•----,-7-4."=.914'•.-_4 •‘;6-:- -•-• --• '2'--,....__7.:7.-r-,;---,:::).= -,"--ivr:Itt-i.:i, '-6, -)7-'-f:.-:.:',--"7-_'---,_-:::-,-_-- ..,..,-..,eah _,_, - _17---rrae42..„'.r 1,-4:,--41,-cr.'ry-r_.• '',. •t,,,•4._''- _,,•,_„„ -,041,. ....-, .... y • -,,,.....,.. , ,_%.•,.--,•:-;,,ert•;i1p.-.. ...ttA:L,Fir.:,a'.--,--4--f-6---- "-,_ ' ,_-. '-NI-t-2 • 'f';--S'r-,:.. ,, I;:q4'., 7-":.7..7,',s,.47.CT:t.'-',..!"-L-L''.:r..'": , ->:•, r -'1-.I.V4-4,•:,,-.'rr.' _ . . ff...4.::"3. ..', _-.,..-...46....-24, - -,_ - -- -. _ , , t-741c,-6-.1• 4',-25-. .- , _ ......_ _ ,...,.. ....: •$ter._ . r''A. I. -..* ...•.- ' i -- -.1.r -A.:•:." ••:.-...: -.;-,,i.-e.:7 _._,-- . ,,.-,.._-e...- . .,. _- - -_ .'i--7,:-..-,..t.......".... • ..: - '' . - -.. -- .----t••-,-. , A , •••••.• .P -.. -4.••,-,.,:.-F.4.---,-.4....-4.-4--, -•• - '-•••---- - ' - --,.. .. - e Z../1 SS g• c a• RI;A b, LA.,/ f-100 5 E . . MINOR SUBDIVISION APPLICATION 010 . Property. Owner(s) _±__ t : �i. 4'I� . Address . 2 - . 'Si0/ ..� i Phone ( ) �.2• - _7 a-/ Devekvger/Contact Name I 2_ �__ X4.4. -!- - -.r °r 52 S" 174i/.2-0 Address Phone ( ) 7, .2 _ j'S Location of Property 6 S . /ii e. /V hi township map. block lot A /„,, _ Zoning . - �. Fire District Watershed Impervia7.Ls. Surface ' Joint Planning: C.H. -- Carrboro °-" School District Q _ State Road Number /[7 0 4. Name Type __ _4Wgg Private Road Class t_, Name Do you plan to build the road before final approval? or secure construction with a security document?. a---- Utilities: Public Sewer Community System . Septic Tank Public Water Community Water Well ' t...--° If on a septic system, the Health Department must examine all existing and poterrt5_ai building sites on lots shown on the plat. Total Lot Area 4p . 6 ,4 (!„ Number of Lots et ' .. Lot Number: Size of Lots: Structures (proposed or existing): . . / 11/ I (We) hereby certify that I (we) have read the above information and that the information I (we) have supplied is accurate to the best of my (our) knowledge. I (we) understand - - my (our)=:application is not complete and cannot be approved unless all required information and material has been provided. ale C - Q m it e- /L_!� Date Signature •.s - - Date Signature Filing Fee # of Lots Fee Private Road Fee Other Fee Total Fees Date Paid • 4 - • - o - T 369AC. \ 84t6 q `° 011 I rn 0 .03K 4, B. m I 1 - 8217 `p p.I w - t 1 w _ - 1.51 t 6161 1 1 AC. 10-48 AG - N I I AC. V- t": 400' 10 I I SF DWE4.1...s►Jcr R 042'. 10.3933 I - 5AC• ; Ex's-rrN C-, "73AC. . 1 4.......ia:0°141111t 10 Ctil 0"', , - i 1.5 AC.1 1.5 AC:- O 14 .8561 - i 7631 �r�l . 4. / 0519 - _ ��° *41 - � R. p PARTIAL �W 1.05 8.66X.6024 ,2 7, a � o rp 3 0' La I D e I.C6• • L:: . - 15 FOR APPROX• 11• �� ; 4 42.668 AC. 20 1 DD' AEG'uESTED 328 AC. 14F ' x.01 A -. .. • r _. 2 1.03 AC'- .<< 0 T. 5A0 `• . 2866 Ci 7901 I • .%...........r. �\ N 0 . _ I I - - 309 II II w 342.33 f¢324AC. • - • 355 =• .8158 ,_- _ AC. 1 _:'33959 o•9er�c �I - 866 • 21 - 9696 I AC, II o ..-..- 3535 AC.a69° ; 3684 I I 19 -AC. 1.34 AC - I It 6 . 5. . Iit a ' i . . \X - , — B(--. ... \\\\ 1\ - 1 1\ . `\ -. 012 f . _r `. `/ 92/� y s• .. .....� • t es. vo , p. "pii 4 :1 17 Ev.. . .% 13-_ 6 r ;r, LL �{ .9-. • ° ' ••• V.6 iiul t r r Ci: : Ca -.4.1 _ 1 y,.;°zi ,•y('a ■' 3 To •r ' 4 V) a �M .� a 0 cc ` ` y:b. a Y G y6 a 503 g Nek ti r "' r. : w a j us • RYA.. NI if 4 1 e�-..17..1). 4 m. r r. w �.i• - • ' - '.4'� , > : 0 fff"`j.111 ItJ � V4+ *` - _ lei'° ,O. = . y O O a s room' r- Y rc. .. . .J CC d - r.. 'sue a- cnca H _ w� r �- k m m ri - o � acx! al ` ' I" ( w n C I w f U 3- x w C3 Li.. ?- ' • ii. i- . U 1 } CC ql 1 1 "•■ d c�G cv a , • • 013 Rt. 3, Box 401 Hillsborough, NC 27278 August 3, 1986 Planning Board Orange County Hillsborough, NC 27278 To Whom It May Concern: - Attached are statements from land owners bordering our property. In these statements the owners refuse to sell or give road right of ways to Lots 1 and 2. - The purpose of the division of this land is for our two children. Our son would like to start construction this year. No other subdivisions will be requested for two reasons: (1) Since we have only two children, two subdivisions are all that will be necessary. - - (2) Land on 14C and part of Lot 2 do not perk (attached is perk test). Sincerely, 1-45:01<20-* Gene W. Ray Brenda W. Ray F ,.. F 014 ORANGE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT . . REFERENCE NUMBER DATE FIN . MAP FtEFERENCE .---.-- . . F' .-..- . . -EOUESTEE: OWNER: _ - ,. - :. h ' . -...- ""el::..7,{-• k‘..1 . LEPHONE: •.:,-PECIFICATIONS: : ...I —4 ).,! - . - .;'. .: i: r ' - ' - •, ' - _OCATION/DIRECTIONS: . - - :-,, '.- -.'•".-.; s: ci 7 7..;-- ' .: is•:;- . '‘'-‘, ;1.---- -:-. 1,-7. F:', .r' '''. -.:' ' : . '. 't -7'1-- ; ,-"EE: RECEIPT.; SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR AUTHOFdZEO AGENT: i . _11-•,.' ./...' _ • ,,e-,-.- -.1:-.4?-,e,,::1:::801 ,,--'="2 CONFIRMED BY PLANNER: . PLANNER DATE_j CLERK .--7.!PE'- -='" - • 7._;fltr . . . . - - • • __—__ _, __ ,s., L,1 L - f _ X I !. • 1 . il V._-.. ] 1_.;-- 4:14-r....1. , • i , , ' i 2.- j ., . -.1..13--.-/ . I -...4 1 ; . ......../ 1 1 .. 1 1.---- ....- 1 _......... i •. ..,==... ..i 0 1••-,-._;._.....----'--r /C. . I, r -,,Ph.•.,..V- 1 ( I ' i • . . , - •(_ ! —---. —..,...... ___...----- . —_____.---- 1 . . • .,--„- . • : 4 - 1 . , .• :..-..."..m. ,.........._... . .......F.''''''' . ! .. d."...'''''' . . ..* 1 i -, • . . - 4 i ,', • _ -,. ..4w.m.F.F .- i ...... • 1 :: ''''',r 7• : ./....r..... "7.7" 1 4 . 1 -----,, i / .1.4._ . n '7.-- 1 ------- i . - f..-------,.. / 1 ._..---7-- tr".\....e,' .,..1- :;,;.-re'II 47•■••—• _1 \ 2 • i - -(----r-- i' / /1.--.-----'----7 8 ..---- i ":4- •\ ; I • \ . /7 , 1 ,....../.c / r V. : X . I -. ...,..,-.. i ■ . ''''' ■ ; •i.;', .1 \ . ..,(_,..." i • ._ • I Ll 1 \ -1,1 I • ' I i \ , i k t • LL I . • .`-1 ' . . 7.; _ , .,-.-- r t ,,, f:... , ,e- d ( i 3,,,- ......., _..) ..r 2,0 . .." 7:.GEND2 ITEM fi 7 : SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS, 015 Yuhasz stated he would be abstaining from ageCa jtems #7 brclrerhrj due to professional conflict of interest. ` , a. Gene and Brenda Ray -- Partial Width ROT7 Presentation by Collins. The purpose of this agenda item is to consider a request for a partial width right-of-way of 30 }e,: for a distance of appr.oxir;a.telyT 100 feet to G-,_r-ve a one lot minor- subdivision on a lot known as Biltg.n6:n Township--Map 5 Lots 14C & 14H (the Gene & Bt:'nda Ray Subdivision) . The Rays propose to create one new lot to be served by a Class C road. A partial width right-of--way is needed beca,‘se there is an existing dwelling that could not meet the required 20 foot setback. The Rays cannot acquire additional footage or alterna- tive access from the neighboring lots. This is tho last subdivision of this lot as the soil is only suitable for three dwellings. Approval of this request would allow a minor subdivision of one lob for their son. Collins noted that this application meets the requirements for a partial width. right-of--way. Kizer indicated he thought it would be eusiar in the long run to ask for a variance in the setback regulations for the house. Collins responds.d that by granting a partial width right-of-way 'chc end result would be a conforming house. which •rout the e tisC.bh:.'s! requi.ren'l'-:J. Granting; would re-_ ult in a house which would encroach into the right--of---way. Collins note that there had been such cases previously so a predsnt was not being set. MOTION: Kizer moved approval. Seconded by Shanklin. O E O R A N G E C O U N T Y � BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Meeting Date: Septmber 2, 1986 ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Action nda Item ; SUBJECT: PD-2-86 HEARTWOOD AT BLACKWOOD MOUNTAIN DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING S X No Attachment( s) Information Contact: MARVIN COLLINS VICINITY MAP SUMMARY SHEET IMPACT STATEMENT PLANNING BOARD FINDINGS APPLICATION AGENCY COMMENTS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING DRAFT PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES DRAFT PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 PURPOSE : To receive the Planning Board 's recommendation . To consider for approval the proposed planned development rezoning and Class A Special Use Permit request submitted by Spence and Lyn Dickinson known as Heartwood . This item was considered at public hearing on May 27, 1986, June 16, 1986, July 7, 1986 and August 4, 1986. NEED: Spence and Lyn Dickinson are requesting approval of a planned development rezoning and issuance of a Class A Special Use Permit for 35 .21 acres of land located west of Mill House Road (SR 1725) in Chapel Hill Township . The property is referenced as Tax Map 19 Lots 26A and 29 in Chapel Hill Township . The. property is located within an area designated Rural Buffer in the Orange County Land Use Plan . The present zoning classi- fication is Rural Residential (R-1 ) . The applicants are requesting that the 35 .21 acres or 1 ,533,747 .6 square feet be rezoned PD-H-R-1 .2 IMPACT: Approval of the request would allow development of attached and detached single-family residential structures with an overall density of one unit per 40,000 square feet. The applicants have revised the site plan to provide for a total of 33 dwelling units, including three (3) duplexes (buildings #4/ 14, 15/ 16 and 17/18) . Proposed building sites of ' #22 and 22 have been combined on the revised plan as site #26 . Proposed building sites #4, 14, and 15 are shown on the revised plan as the three duplex units . There is no building/site referenced as #25 on the revised plan . The proposed cul -de-sac is shown on the revised plan as a loop road named Blackwood Mountain Road . On the revised plan the septic tanks and nitrification lines for the artist bungalows and community center have been shifted to the original location of community well #1 . The applicants have also shifted the location of well #1 south of the artist bungalows to meet state requirements regarding the location of well sites in proximity to septic tanks/nitrification fields. The revised community well location has not yet been approved by the N.C. Department of Human Resources, Division of Health Services . The letter dated April 21 , 1986 from the Division of Health Services addressed only those suitable sites in the northwest and southwest corners of the property. See Impacts Statement for further information. WJ 018 RECOMMENDATION : Article 8.2.2 states that where a preponderance of evidence indicates compliance with the general standards, specific rules governing the specific use, and that the use complies with all required regulations and standards, the application must be approved unless it is found, in some specific manner that: 1 . The use will not promote the public health, safety and general welfare if located where proposed and developed and operated according to the plan as submitted; 2. The use will not maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property; 3 . The use is not in compliance with the general plans for the physical development of the county as embodied in these regulations or in the Comprehensive Plan , or portion thereof, adopted by the Orange County Board of Commissioners. The burden of proving one or more of the above findings is on those opposing the application . The proof must also be in the form of competent material and substantial evidence. The Planning Board reviewed the application, the site plan and all supporting documentation and found that no information was received which would establish grounds for making one or more of the above findings. However, the Planning Board has not found compliance with the following specific standards applicable to planned development-housing applications: 8.2.4a) Health Department approval for all lots; 7 . 14.3a)3 sight visibility triangles at public road intersections; and 7 . 14.3a) 5 provisions for screening of parking areas . The Planning Board does recommend approval of the planned development rezoning and issuance of a Class A Special Use Permit with the attached conditions of approval . These conditions of approval address the specific standards referen ced above and design concerns . 019 1 . The grantee of this Special Use Permit shall post with Orange County , in a form acceptable to the County Attorney, a bond or letter of credit in an amount equal to the cost of all improvements (roads, utilities, pedestrian walkways.) plus 10S . The amount shall be determined on the basis of full executed construction contracts or certification by a registered engineer employed by the grantee of this Special Permit. Security for construction of the improvements in this project may follow . phasing in the project. Specifically, as improvements are completed in each phase a corresponding amount of money may be released from the security instruments or the security instruments may be renegotiated based on the "yet to do" portion of the improvements . - - 2. Security shall be provided for the grading, paving and stabilization of all cleared areas, streets and other vehicular traveiways; pedestrian walkways; erection of street signs; utilities Installation and hookup;_. recreational facilities; and landscaping . 3. All necessary easements to permit utility (electricity, telephone) Instal- lation, servicing and hookups to the development and to each unit within the development shall be provided at no cost to the utility provider. 4. The grantee shall promulgate Articles of Incorporation governing tenancy in the development and shall record a copy of the Articles of incorpora- tion and Regulations promulgated under this condition in the Orange County Registry of Deeds . 5 . Roads, parking areas, walkways, street signs, utilities, recreation facia- ities and sites, landscaping of the community center and its associated parking facility shall be maintained as constructed . All such improve- ments and facilities shall further be maintained and operated In a safe manner. - 6. The following recommendations apply to the road and parking facilities: a. Road name signs to Orange County standards shall be erected at all intersections. b . The private Class A road serving the community center shall terminate in a cul-de-sac . The parking facility for the community center shall access off the private road, but not the cu l°-de--sac itself. - c. The private Class A road serving the community center shall be con-- structed to Orange County private road standards, but shall be hard- surfaced in compliance with NCDOT Minimum Construction Standards for 'pavement design for subdivision roads. s.-.ts_A_st.d_n_ai IRO a nc a D,g r eement. s u bmitI e.d..,_f4_a_n�i_..aplar v e d__by the QrallaD Gom.D t y Attorney pri r_t9 he_rD�Qr.LiAt.ts.q_01_. ham. Qeed recDr40..d_._1p the Or_an4Le aS2.unt�i._.�.1 agister �?f. d . Sight triangles incompliance with NCDOT requirements and Article 9 of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance shall be provided at all road intersections and shall be designated as part of the right-of-way. e. Two parking spaces meeting the dimensional requirements provided in Article 10 of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance shall be provided for each dwelling unit. The location of these items shall be approved by the Zoning Officer and shown on the revised site plan . 020 7 . The following recommendations apply to the recreation area and facilities. a. Tot lot/playground area to include play apparatus for children, ages pre-school to 14 ( i .e . swings, slides, climber, whirl ) and benches for adult supervision . Some shaded areas are to be provided within the tot lot area. The tot lot area shall be . defined/enclosed with a barrier. b . Picnic area to include a small shelter with 3-4 tables . One ( 1 ) trash receptacle and one ( 1 ) grill per 2 tables . c. Provide one ( 1 ) parking space for each dwelling unit. Provide one (1 ) handicapped parking space for every 10 spaces . Parking spaces shall meet the dimensional requirements of Article 10 of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance. Nandis'�pRed paLk ng. space.s_sh. I I be barr_ ter _ freg .and Zd�Ltlf.Led_fpr-Rag_by 1ndjviduals with pflysJcal._.Sl1sDbi.litie s handicapALesf parking spa s<e5 _ s .01 J"._h a a m i nim m__szf_1. 1__1 n__w1slfb_an.d sba 11 j p sle.sianed as fo 11owa.;. ( 1 ) AQ_.tIL±_bbrsli pgd_f lL d.1Yistiols__Dr.e_nat. 4mpailei...±s_11.11ea1 Qr__W lk_bsbinsl_.rarkssi_ Cars (2) 59__thDf__.bnns1s.aFpDsJ__1n41YILimills_.._stnn_._snter ansi_ex.t_fhe hisl.e onto p ISY I- --surface_ sir J tDhlz_:fpi- wbaeli ng._....ARs[ • Ytalk I n g (3) In c o n j_unc,f on with .s i.dgxtnl.k_.ga"f-axe ys_an.dL4r rim p� d . The parking area shall be screened and landscaped in accordance with Article 12 of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance. e. Consfrmc±_cJ1_xcaj king_nsl__h1klag_.p.afhs_mifh_n__m.Jnirnmm__m.idth_Di_ 4� iD0t_nn4__pn_sis2pes araAitb.en 5g . Construct _s1i rid iDa1b.I1s_ing t u i ls_laf .__a_._m i rt i m un_[isithD fA f e e i t h a m141m u m p f 1. .e.t_Qn_Bitbs.r..__Lda_and_10 kt_.D/ r=beas1 clearance. The location of these items to be approved by the Zoning Officer. and shown on the revised site plan . 8. The following recommendations apply to the lot arrangements. a. Each lot platted on the Final Plat shall include the area associated with the building site and the septic tank, including the nitrification lines and repair areas. - .Where tank/nlfrlf1.sDtlon.__iin15LEDTLa r____are to bs rstesi_s?ff. bs_., prasriy subject ±Q_139 roz g rmlf si,p..rsnriate easeme,af$ sha_l1 be platted and recorded in the Orange County Register of Deeds along with legal descriptions and easement agreements submitted to and approved by the Orange County Attorney. b . All lots shall have Health Department approval prior to the approval of the Final Plat. c. For each structure exceeding 25 ' in height an additional one ( 1 ) foot side and front setback for every two (2) feet of additional height shall be designated on the Final Plat. 021 The location of these items is to be approved by the Zoning Officer and shown on the revised site plan . 9. The .1szs;a±J of tb_e mQm�.uD1f�!._kreits_sba1 1 12.e_a-R xRsi_hy- the_ -*r�:_D ar ice_ mint_Q1Lfium.an._Ras_ourc.es A__.Dimi.slon_plAsDlth_lerYlc� nsi__sb4ma___Dr_-he. rev i sgA_g.1.te p I. n_.pr14z_.fo. the .5u.anc 34mci J_1JsD_P.ermit. 10 .A1i final plans for drainage, soil erosion and sedimentation control shall be reviewed and approved by Orange County and the site plan modified accordingly to satisfy the Soil and Erosion specifications, .jn�.[�a i1ng_the AD . .D.5f. n_p f drD1 n. gg__g.asengnIS_o1 __yr i d th p evil d._by tb1.rsLsiQ.e Control, Oft.lgaaJ.s ngLing_arggis___AIlfi_in±Dx_mittgnf stream , prior to the issuance of the Special Use Permit. In addition, Orange County shall inspect the installation of control devices and the on-going work for the total project. The project shall at all times meet the requirements of the Orange County Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance. 11 .Construct and maintain stormwater devices to control the peak rate of runoff from the community center and artist bungalows. The detention devices shalt be designed and constructed so that the peak rate of runoff. after development will not exceed the predevelopment rate for a 20 year 24 our storm and for storms of greater Intensity. 12.Grading on the site shall be kept to a minimum. Existing vegetation shall be maintained between units . Clearing shall only be conducted for pur- poses of installing roads, utilities and other improvements until the improvements have been installed and the developer conveys title - to the property to the individual property owners purchasing three or fewer lots. Existing vegetation shall not be removed from the area with 50 feet of the Duke Forest proper 13.Final landscaping plans shall be submitted and approved by the Zoning Officer prior to the effective date of the special use permit. 14.That all signs be erected in compliance with Article 9 Signs, following issuance of a building permit and prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any unit. No sign may be erected within the sight triangles for the entranceway to the development. 15 .That all structures be erected in compliance with applicable building codes following application for and issuance of building permits. 16 ..The developer shall coordinate mail service with the Postmaster prior to the initiation of construction . 17 .A final boundary survey of the Planned Development and all improvements and easements ( roads, utilities, drainage, sign) shall be recorded by the developer . - - 18.The final site plan and narrative of the project incorporating all changes, deletions and additions through the final approval of the project are incorporated herein and made. a part of this Planned Development Special Use Permit. , A copy of the final site plan and narrative are on file with the Orange County Planning Department. Grading and building permits, upon application, will be issued after approval and recordation of the Special Use Permit. 19.The development shall be built and operated according to, the site plan and written narrative supplied by the developer and in compliance with or fulfillment of the above conditions and the Orange County development regulations and ordinances. • 022 20. If any of the above conditions shall be held invalid or void: then this approval shall be void and of no effect. Please note that conditions #1 -5 and 10-20 are common to all planned develop- ment-housing--rezon i ngs and special use permits. • • • • • • • A88 1iC M UL i987 MAP 19A t � .. 28.48 AC. (PERRY,PERRY.CATE9) I 'mot•-- i ` ,. Oleo IC 1 + r y 1 ri89! ' ►rE - ►�OALJL�$�T8+1iL 11 1 1 1 411�i r1H] 1 9 s 13 21AC. i Q lees g 1 y y ' 712AC, t=J l-A 18 Q19A1 LJ �f2ES'1) 1 1 : -- P '!2.155A C. 3.TR A{' l 1 f4.dm Irf S1 e0,leT >'eH pSb • GAR D�>;Et✓BStEST 0744 OUC C 12AC. •3x77 �A �f l nA ..�. ;. J to �`� $11�CtiWCtiiDDt�/. 3AC. 10 02 AC *+ 4r4 1 yr� 1 ElA�itso:4 w -r k SORE {3} f.5 AIL r -- • l •'412a vice V. T84AC I',2.9AC� �7 4 2 5 AC _ {1�I MAPEL 14ILL ��' • a6AC za 7tAC. �' /► 1► _`_ � 27 �',:Ui Esc" •►y ► •_,:;��� "i��A�'' 'sau' �,�. � � 20 ravzC 1� �,•` i .2 A +'lafZ ?5 dlstl, '2 2� �i' vela 6rsr 1 7697 2t1 Ati �UO1;eV761 r. �9 . _ y21N: 528AC I ' lt1.54 G - - .. . ....». X707 .��rD +',1,+/��t��/ .1 11.73 L'; •4L99 p �', � .. 25D Jrcia,►• �„ 1657.71 Ac.) _.. ...�..�..... , • ''•..,,� � • ., w lase ��2 M.,r>ta4 r � o+�l,exinc '"' y' , �w.wwrr� N 25 .Jig? n'T 171OD5 ti it/w t2a�f SR 1�'Ai 1. , ..w,r...•r,,,,,,..,e�.wr.r..w+w.+w rwi ..� �..-.,.w,.. ..• � —• 1!KiS /b S1� r ' ,` e mss' J ?T BRAG :f . r i �+.,.n-rn r►+..+^�"" r}. p*� I 1i i •}/irr�i 11'41 �I 'ORANGE Cfl PLANNING DEP ARTMENT A'ir 7 snoTi ucla t 4 NoRTI CAROLINA # • - 27278 • MEMORANDUM - . TO: ORANGE COUNTY . PLANNING BOARD - FROM: SUSAN SMITH, PLANNER III DATE: MAY 14, 1986 SUBJECT: PD-2-86 • • fi,ENERAL i NF0RMAJ.QN . APPLICANTS: Spence and Lyn Dickinson Route 8 Box 92K Mill House Road - Chapel . Hill , NC 27514 LOCATION:- West side of Mill House Road (SR 1725) . STATUS OF APPLICANTS: Owners - - REQUESTED ACTION: Approval - of Planned Development--Housing- Residential -1 rezoning and Special Use- Permit . • PURPOSE: To allow a planned development of attached and detached units providing. for - . a total of 35 residential : units and associated community facilities ., LOT SIZE: 35 .21 acres or 1 ,533,747 .6 square feet - EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant, wooded land SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING: . North - vacant, wooded zoned R-1 ; . - Blackwood Mountain Estates • subdivision ; proposed Emerson Waldorf School South - vacant land and 1o4 - density residential land uses, zoned R-1 East - Mill House Road and the Southern Railroad ; . proposed . Emerson Waldorf School • • West - vacant, wooded land zoned R-1 ; 025 property of the Chapel 111 i 1 • Policeman 's Association; Blackwood Division of Duke Forest LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION/ZONING: : Designated as Rural Buffer. This Land Use Plan category allows for the development of the site for residential use at densities not to exceed _ 40,000 square feet per unit. The property is zoned Residential-1 . • • • • • • • • • • • 02E MEMORANDUM TO: ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD FROM: SUSAN SMITH DATE: MAY 20. 1986. SUBJECT: HEARTWOOD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONING DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS DERV ICE S - A dual well community system is proposed as the water supply for the development . Mr . Hallisey of the NT.,C. Department of Human Resources Division of Health Services has indicated that a community system is appropriate for the development . His written comment identifies sites for the location of the wells (SEE ATTACHED LETTER) . - Individual on-site wastewater systems are proposed for each unit. The Orange County Health Department has approved 27 of 35 requested septic system sites. The Health Department advises that careful attention must be made to assure adequate ownership, maintenance and repair responsibilities (SEE ATTACHED LETTER) . TRAEEIC/BOADB. • The site is served by an existing unpaved state maintained road Mill House Road (SR 1725) . The property is - located approximately 4000 feet from NC' 86 at Blackwood Station. A 1984 NCDOT traffic count indicated there were 150 trips per day on Mill House Road (SR 1725) . A 35 unit single-family residential development represents a traffic generation rate - of 2 .5 times the current traffic load or approximately 336 additional trips per day on Mill House Road. (SEE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR FURTHER INFORMATION) POLIOEfRE_A.NJZBEZCUE_EEHY10Ea The New Hope Volunteer Fire Departments Sheriff ' s Department and Orange County Rescue Squad have all commented on police, fire and rescue service for this development and have indicated their willingness and ability to -serve the property without problems (SEE ATTACHED LETTERS) . - - RECREATION FACILITIES 1027 Proposed recreation facili ties inclu de a community building 1 housing the homeowners ' association office, art and music "facilities, meeting rooms , library, worship facilities , after school and summer camp facilties ; pond and dock facility; outdoor amphitheater ; camping and picnic sites ; tot lot ; hiking and riding trails ; farm and stable; and community garden. All recreational facilities will be under the ownership and maintenance responsibilities of the Homeowners ' Association. • Students from this development would attend Grady Brown Elementary School for grades H-5 , Stanback Middle School for grades 6 and 7, Stanford Junior High School for grades 8 •and . 9 and Orange High School for grades 10 -- 13 . Although not commenting on the specific impacts of this development, Mr . Ira Tsollinger, Assistant Superintendent for Instructional Services for the Orange County School District , has indicated that the Orange County School District is reaching capacity for instructional classroom space (SEE ATTACHED LETTER) . Using. the proposed 35 dwelling units and a multiplier of .232 for two bedroom single-family units this development would generate an additional 8.12 school-age children. A private elementary school and day care facility known as . the Emerson Waldor School is proposed for a ten acre tract recently subdivided from the property in question. Site and construction plans have been approved by the Planning Department and the N.C. Department of Insurance for the elementary school facility. An application for a Class B special use permit for the day care facility has been submitted for consideration by the Orange County Board of Adjustment. The day care facility must be approved by the N.C. following construction and prior to occupancy of the facility. BELA110=1P BETWEEN_LLAN1LM _ZQNINQ QUI E The property is located within the Rural Buffer. The Rural Buffer designation corresponds with the Residential-1 (P.-1) zoning district. The property is also proposed as Rural Buffer on the proposed joint planning area plan. EEFUITIED_VBEE The purpose of the Residential-1 (R--1) zoning district is to provide for single-family residential development on minimum 40 , 000 square foot lots . - • Uses permitted by right or special use permit within the R-1 district include: emitted -bv Right 02 Single family dwelling Two family dwelling Mobile home Family care home Temporary mobile home. Accessory. uses Botanical gardens Bus shelters Church Protective services Parks Schools • Universities, colleges Governmental facilities Water and sewer pumping stations Clubs Greenhouses (no on-premises sales) Greenhouses (on-premises sales) Commercial feeder operation Recreational facilities (profit/non-profit) h the �ssxranee of a Class A Soeeial IJPQ Pernit • Airport Landfill Public utility station Historic structure non-residential mixed use p rni ted wit the,aa.,gu zsia_cf_z ' gpee iaJ._UUe Permit Daycare, nursery and kindergarten Group care facility Temporary mobile home (custodial) Portable buildings Cemetary Community center Land fill ( less than two acres) Radio and transmitting towers Transmission lines Kennels and stables Recreational facilities (non-profit) Rezoning of the property provides for the planned development of the parcel to allow for a clustered arrangement of rattached and detached residential units and incorporating open space and recreational amenities. FINDINGS OF HE ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD PERTAINING TO ' APPLICATION —HEARTWOOD AT RLACK1140D 140WITAJ!�J • rr PIanncC, developments must comply with general and specific -standards as set fortis in Article 8 for Special Uses as as those set forth in Article 7 for Planned Developments, Article 8.2.1 b; requires written findings- certifying compliu-nce with the following: (l ) Specific regulations governing individual Special Uses as set forth In Article U.8. These regulations are jivided .into two (2) sections which Include; ,a) Application components; and fib} Specific standards for Planned Developments (Article 8.8.23 refers to•Article 7 standards) and Special Uses (Article 8,2,=0 (2) ether requirements as set forth In the Zoning Ordinance, - Including the-provisions of Artiele . 5 (Dimensional Requirements) and Article b (Application of Dimensional Requirements) t Listed below are the findings of the Orange County Planning Board regarding the application In question.' The I have been presented by Article and requirement to assist the Board of Commissioners in it's deliberations . ARTICLES 8.6 AND 8.8 APPLICATION 'COKPONENTS ("Yes" indicates compliance-, "No" indicates noncom Hance) f Planning Board BacC Ordinance Requirements Findings lay$d&na:e 5ubmItied To Support Findinrs Findings 8 .6-App ( cation submitted on forms x Yes No Completed application, detailed site plan Yes- p r-ov i s3 g �u l l and accurate `•`�" and findings submitted by applicant %!ccsr'i P i ors of proposed use, Includ- ing !oc_; ?•ion., appearance and opera Lion,-)] cJlaracterl stl cs' ' 8,8 a�--c -n (7} coples' of the site . 'X Yes No Submitted by.applicaiit •• Yes plan prc�parod by a reglstelred ,N.C, .....r ._.. land sturveyor� or engineer con'talnings 1 . North point, scale and date x , No Shown on site plan � � Yes 2 . Extc�!t of area to be developed ,. Yes No Yes .--,�, Shown on site .'plan' • ye 3 . Loca i on:.and width of all ease- Yes � N Sho�w.n on' site �z)ldn , •. --= ••--4 s mcnt , and rights-of-way w? thin, , or z ,3CCnt to the site �' ' ,• . ART1C�; ; 3.6 AND •i3 - APPLICATION COMPONENTS (Continued) Planning Board 30C .Ordinance -Rcquirements Findings 'Evidence Submitted To Support Findings Findings „ ... It. Loca t i on of a l axis tang or pro- X Yes No Shown on the site plan Yes 3 posed: structures on the site 5. Location of all l areas on the sits X_ Yes No yes *site is not in a flood hazard su bject to flood hazard or nunda- area as determined by the U.S.H.U.D. tion as shown on - flood maps or soli maps Shown on site plan. Only .one all weather 6. Location of all water courses x Yes No stream is oh the* property; other drainage yes on Lhe site, including the "— swales noted on the site 'plan. -- di reetion of flow � 7. Ex1 st i ng topography at a contour x Yes No- Topographical information from USGS, . Yes interval of five (,) Fact based Chapel Hill Quadrangle 1978. Shown on on mean sea level datum site plan. Shown on site plan. Landscaping of $ Proposed or existing fencing, _X_ Yes No the community building parking area to ,._.. Yes screening, gates, parking, be in compliance with Article 12. of the scry i ce and storage areas . Zoning Ordinance. J. 9, Accass to sl tc Including site . . Yes No Shawn on site p Yes: ' d i $ LZ�fl,ces on all roads used for , � accL;S 10, Elevations of all strdetures Yes ' No .s hown. on Site plan ' ' ._... Yes proposed to be used in the dcvolopment 11 , Names and addresses of 'owners " ex Yet' No Shown on site, plan/appli.'cation '� yes and app li:ants 0 • ; 12, A fcc-, as set by the Board ''of "X yes" , No ' Paid with submittal. � s County Camnlas loners AR i! C " .8-23-SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATi Ot-UPLANNED DEVELOPMENTS Article 8,$,23 indicates thht the application shall comply with the applicable sections of Article 7-Planned i}cve' ART1CLE 7-SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/PLANMED DEVIE OPA NTS ("Yes" Indicates compliance; No'r indicates noncor Planning Board BQCC Ordinance ReRulrements Findings •EVldcriee Submitted To Support Findings Findiri ' Article 7.4 indicates the appltca- ,, c tion m.ust first comply with all requircrlcnts specified in Article 20 - Amendments. Those regci i remen is . include: 20.3.2 a) Map showing affected x Yes No Submitted with application Yes' No property a t scale of not less .�.. ---. than 1" = 1.00' nor more than 1" 20' , .20,3.2 b) Legal descri tption of Yes No _- ___.. Yes HO property �- Submitted with application. 20-3.2 c) Explanation of alleged Yes No None alleged". .._ Yes .No error, if any, to be corrected by proposed aimendmenC 20.3.2 d) Changed conditions, if Yes No None alleged. Yes NO any, rriz ch make amendment reasona-i biy nccc,sary to promote public health, safety and general welfare , 20,3.2 c] Manner in whl ch proposed. ;{ Yes No- Land Use Plan designates area as part of Yes No amendment wIII carry out purpose '. Rural Buffer with R-1 Residential zoning. z)nd. intent of adopted Comprchens i ve Proposed use is being developed at density of Plop one -( 1), unit per acre which is-consistent with ' Land Use Plan and zonin ' designa.tions. An plicanC id also clustering units to preserve open space. Planning Board Orclinancc i;ec BOCC �uircments Flndinc�s Evidence Submitted To Support Findings Findings Articic 11 .2 identifies the criteria which wi i i normally be used to determine the appli- cation of a zoning district - designation. The applicant has , applied for nn �Tqhatlon, The criteria for that district are set forth in Article 4.2. E and are as follows: a). Designated in the Land X_,,. Yes `. No The property is located w hi.n the -- Yes � No Use Plan for. rural residential di Rural Buffer. The zoning district use, applicable td the Rural Buffer is R-i'. t�} Urban services not likely, X , Yes � No. The property is not located within Yes � No to serve the area within 4n. existing or proposed urban 'servicas 10-20 years. district. ' Yes No ' •---. .Yes Yes y ATI CLE 8. 2.4 SPECIFIC STANDAII,DSIALL SPECIAL. USES ("Yes" Indicates com Rance; "too" Indicates noncompliance) P l ann l ng Board BOCC Ordinance Roquirements Findings Eylclence 'Submltted To Support Findings Findings Article 8.2 .4 requires the applicant W to address the following:. CIO a). Method and adequacy of provision ' Yes X No See attached •letters frpm N.C. Divisiorl_ Yes l� for sewage disposal facilities, _.._.. of Health' Services. and the Orange County . so] id %,raste and water servEcB Health Department. The NX. Division of Health Services has approved three sites for corrimunity wells. ' The applicant proposes a .dual well system. The Health Department. has apprpved 27 sites for indiVidual on-site septic-systems. The Health Department has also advisdd that maintenance, repair and.lownership responsibilities be clearly delifteated. ( SEE CONDITIONS #8 AND g g - b) Method and adequacy of police, _.X_ Yes ._ NO See attached letters from protective Yes Nc fire and rescue squad protec services re capability. to service ? t I on development. All .responclonts indicated an ability to serve the site. c) Mo thod and adequacy of vehlcle ", Yet " loo '� , � Yes N a ccc s: to the alto and t ra f:_f 1 a Soa attached �trakfk� survey, prepared --� -w--• conditions -around to Can site' by Post and ,Asajoc. engirt' eering firm Mill lioUse Road is 8n Unpaved state-maintained . r oil d,which, carries ,a 100 traffic load. , WCDOT hay l.nd S c�'ted a unwi 1.l .ngness to impose requirement that Ilia appl cant upgrade the road. NCDCT has a3so ; ndict_ted that' ithen fully developu Ci the raposed t ensit4l would allow for state mas.r,t_ ;_ of i me real publ.i c road sys,tern, � . �ltTiCLE ] - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/PLAUED DEVELOPMENTS (Continued) . Planning Board BO Orel i nance RegU i remen is l fid i nqs EyI denfiQ Submitted To Support lit nd1 ngs Fi ncf i nc�s Article 7.4 then indicates the - application must comply with ; certain specific requirements conmion. to all Planned Deve l op- ments. These indlude; 7.4 .1 So .located with respect to x Yes NO HEARTWOOD COURT & HEARTWOOD TIRIVF COLLECT __._ Yes No major streets and mass transit TRAFFIC FROM 35--DWELLING UNITS & EMPTY facilities and designed so as not THAT TRAFFIC ONTO SR 1725 A GRAVEL STATE to create traffic on minor streets MAINTAINED ROAD. IN LESS THAN ONE MILE in residential districts DISTANCE SR'.1725. TRAVELS TOIN.C. HWY 86 . NO MINOR RESIDENTIAL STREETS ARE AFFECTED. SEE POST AND ASSO. TRAFFIC STUDY 7.r+ .2 So located with respect to X Yes No THE DEVELOPMENT REQUIRES NO PUBLIC Yes No . +-ia tc r, s cwc r and storm drainage FINANCED WATER, SEWER OR STORM faci l i tics that enlargement or DRAINAGE FACILITIES. extension will not result in ; ljighor not pW is cost or earlier incursion or public cost ` and ' So located wl th respect to X Yes No ACCESS TO PROTECTIIIE SERVICES PROVIDED Yes No police fire and rescue services, IN SAME MANNER. AS PERMITTED UNDER and schools and parks so os to EXISTING ZONING, have access In tho same manner as perml ttc� under the existing Zoning C THE SITE IS NOT IN A 'FLOOD HAZARD AREA AS' W DETERMINED 13Y. THE U.S.111.U.D. EROSION CONTROL 7,4,3 S 1 to su 1 table for develop- Yea .� Flo WILL BE DTJV.Z,1C C�TSTRUCTZD.. P,ISE Y's VIER No - ment without hazard ,from flooding, S&"A 0F.F-� 7 „ ,,,Q , ;, .�." , ?� S R;. �:VaREMEi,1TS. , tL L J t Ji;iIVUllliJ:7 1L1ii f.ViltUllI1-iJl'Ijk"1.ls ' L.i_— "I ._dil s� Planning .- Board BOCC .. linshce Requirements r i ndLn q[ Evidence Submitted To support Findings Findings icle 7.' 4.3 sets forth "site nning" standards with which an licant mast comply. Standards' arcing "external relationships" O as follows. w Access points provided to .. X Yes r`No Development will be served by a single !es N encourage smooth traffic direct access to SR 1725, No existing flow with controlled turn- minor streets will be affected. ing 'movements and minimum hazard to vehicular or pedestrian traffic. Use of • ' ' minor streets by substan- tial traffic is discouraged t, safe and convenient routes Yes No Crossings marlced on site plan. ----Yes provided for pedestrians and motorcyclists. Crossings } safely marlced, located and controlled. Visibility provided at inter. YesNo 10x70 Night triangles must be shown at all. Yes sections (pedestrian and intersections. vehicular) in accordance 'with Article 6,8. (SEE CONDITION 06) . 100-foot open space provided v Yes No In compliance with .Article 7. 14. 4 the 100-foot ..... Yes along perimeter of PD-H open space not appTi;:cabl-_ where proposed use is district, Recreational use adjacent to similarly zoned single: family and off-street parking set resident district. bacl< at least: 75 feet of district boundary. Yards, f encos, wall<s or as'X No „Yes vegetation provided to scraon off undesirable Parking area must be screened from adjoining properties views, lighting, noise, and rights--of-way in compliance with Article 22. -- etc, Par,<ing/loading areas (SEE CONDITION 7) and refusc collection/storage . areas screcncd, ... . r1:velrI L.J I i U L'i1S1_LI 1 6 - -- - ' Board BOCC Planning �Drdinance Requirements Findings Evidence Submitted To Support Findings Findi 'Article 7. 14 .3 standards `continued: u06. Maximum building ' ,Yes No Maximum but ldIng• helgt�t permitted is - 25 feet. Yes_ height complies with Bui ldIng height proposed by applicant- Is 34 feet standards set forth maximum as shown -on elevation drawings. Two (2) in Article 6.12.3 and additional feet in height is allowedowith Article 5.1 .1 :very ore foot of additional setback in compliance ' with Article 6.21. `:07. Signs to be erected in ,Yes No Sign plans not subm(tted 'as part of application. Yes accordance with Article 9. Plan! can be .rag u.1 red as a condI'tInn. of annrnta,a.) Sign size and :Location inai.catna on ti-e - plan. Standards regarding ."internal Ib...gquare foot si rin nPrmi tt9A in. c:om-01ance "relationships" are as follows; with Article 9.6. rf {�b}1•. Streets, drives and parking Yes ' No . Site plans indicate that. streets, drives and Yes areas provide safe and con- parking areas are so designed' as '•to provide vonient access for dwellings safe Arid convenle'nt accesses and-and locnoL •ncrcztielsmall .. block sizes. . 02. Vehicular access controlled ' as rollows, a) Streets serving 50 or X Yes No Private drives as' shown on the site plans. Yes loss dwellings provide Direct access to parking spaces for each ' direct access to-parking/ dwelling unit. service areas, c)2, b) Streets serving greater Ye o N/A „ Yes . than 50 dwellings provide ' access to parking areas so . located, designed and controlled os to channel . trofflc without intexrupti.on, X03. Walkways fora safe,- con- Yes No Yep - ---�~ Trail s ys tem� throughout pw o j e ct sh own' on the venient system of access to O dwellings, facilities and Trail system links the residences to the recreatnn off-site dasignatians, and community facilities, Private 'refuse -collectfon - Maximum wa?king distance bor each unit proposed. brrtyicon dwellings and porking3 it;i.E 7 - 5is i--'iFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALDATIONPLANNED DEVELOPMENTS (Continued) Planning -Board BocC . inance Requirements Findings - Evidenco Submitted To Support Findings Findings isle 7.14.3 standards • w W.-ilkways used as play X Yes• N0- CROSSWALKS WELL MARKED. TRAILS areas or school. routes KEPT AWAY. •g.4OM ROAD$ XS-•MUCH. AS POSSIBLY. by children located and designed to minimize ••; ::.. . contact with vehicular : . r ' . ' • ` traffic. Crossings f . appropriately marked and safeguarded. . Protection of visibility- . See 03. and 03. above. X Yea' No , '2�.'4.STGFIT TRIAN01L5,S'•.Vk• .BB •MAYNTAINED . AT TR'AlU:.%CROSSINGS..'ON ICU"LIi AND PRIVATE Yes No . Open space and spacing STREETS. between buildings- •' X Yes' NO ALL BUILDINGS C014PORM TO STANDARDS' SPECII'IED Sec Article G standards. • IN ARTICLE 6 , . Yes No • •. '; . . � •. ice. ; ' , 'y,. :, ,� '. r , i i�l:is�i^i'i��l�� k i ;) Si:�:IL Planning Board _BOCC 1-din3nee Requirements Findings Evidence- Submitted to Support Findings ✓Findi St,ic:le 5 lists standards r minimum lot size, lot 'dth, front, side and rear , tbacks, maximum building 'ight and lot coverage, . '!d development intensity. . e applicant has applied • . ':'• r a PD-H-R-I signation. The standards ' 'r that district are set. , .rth in Article 5.1 . J are as follows; IMinimum lot area per X. Yes No Yes dwelling unit - -40, 000 Planned developments agprdved.on site basis. sq• ft. Average of 40, 000 s g,ft.• Per unit proposed • ��I hIinimum lot width _ Yes No . N/A 'Yes f N/A sq. II Required front setback .. Yes NO W/A Yes Required side and rear , yes. • No Yes .�...�. N/A setbacks i Maximum building height .. Yes : No . Max1mum banding he*19 �t shown on elevations Yes ' e f t .. ,,, prov l ded by appl 3.cant 36 ;gce +mpliance with lot coverage. p " Id davolopment 3ntenail;y �'tndarda is :+ddress d In.M ' •ef ,•!, Ile . •y� •1.fi,ti' 1i�, • ',+ '� •.ea ' r • ',+f,}r•f " R . 'i', -1} ', -* •' ! }! O ' i 1 1 oil i fIOLE 6 - Ni i'LIOAITON1 OF DIMENSI0ML REQUIREMENTS ("Yes" indicates cam fiance• "No" indicates noncompliance) . Planning -Board ' ' • BoCC dinance Requirements Findings Evidence Submitted jo Support Findings Finding; Licle 6 lists specific C andar.ds which apply to . . ', •• co ricus types of development rr plications. Licle 6.12 contains those .:i•:p- Velopment intensity. . ondards which apply to. oup davelopments controlled . the Land Use Intensity . U I) system. .• , . .Minimum gross land X Yes No App I I cant's 's I to .tonla I ns35.21 acres art : , Yes area - 80, 00Osq. ft.: 1; 533, 747.6' sq.f t., ijl4aximum gross land Yes ' No N/A Yes area - N/Asq. ft. ' ' t ax3mum t'loar ratio xYcs No Maximum permitted by ordinance is sq.f t, �Yes _ [��8 • , Apnl Icantas plQhs Indicate floor area. of Maximum. floor area r 82, 000 sg4ft. permitted -- 0•' 35 Dwellings Q Approx 2200 ea. 77, 000 ..88, 951 . 35 sq. Ft. ; . -Community building -less t}lan . 5. 000 . ,• . 82 , 000 Required minimum open . "Yo-a No... ' App13canVt- pleas Indicate 1,452, 747, 6 sq. ft. of. Yes space ratio - . 84 o en s ace: . Requi rod minimum open - apace ,. , ,., , : . • , p p , -1, 288, 348 sq IL L. U 1I L.L i Li U1i'I L N 3 i US':1 iL i L•J LJ l IilA I II 7 , ,'-: ILI;t :L;-J \ . Board BOCC � Planning . finance Requirements. Finding— Evidence SvbmitEed To 5upgort Findings Findings cle 6. 92 standards tinned} '• • . eguired minimum live- XYes No submission indicates 10280, 147 square feet . Yes l bility space ratio. . .nf._j._ve,ability space. .75 Required , liniinum liveability space - • 1, 150, 310. 7 sq. ft. r equired minimum recreation Yes • N0 Appllcant'•s plans' Indicate recreatfon• areas totaling Yes I pace ratio - - 019 96, 000 sq.ft. 2equired mini mum recreation' • apace - 29,141, 20 ft. Required minimum open Yes No Yes_ space adjacent to building wolls 'rimary walls 'N/A ft, , secondary wallgi/A ft, tertiary walls N/A ft. •' •, . . .. • , 1 . Yea, 1 , 111 ,•1 f 1 ' f 1 •' 1 '� v ! See Appendix A for "Definition$"a - • unAilla= L UUi1 I T , PtUn t n Ur1itu4J-11M APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT 04 Date : 4/11/86 • TO THE HOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ORANGE. COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA The undersigned do hereby make application to change the Zoning AtLas o Orange County as hereinafter requested . - The property i.s Located on the *west side of S.R .f 1725 ( MILL HOUSE ROAD Street/Road) between S .R .# N.C. 86 an S .R .0 1726 . It is known as Lots] . 26A , Block , o Orange County Tax Mop 19 - CHAPEL HILL Township . It has a . frontag of 726. 12 feet and a depth of 35.21 feet, end contain square feet or 35.21 acres , • 2. It is desired and requested_ that the foregoing property be - rezone from R1 ■••••• to PD--HRi • . -3-.- The foLt a-wing- information has bra_en _at ached .--ins, support of t appLi•cation for changing the Zoning Attas (* - required. on appLications] . 'a. A fuLLy dimensioned aeprat a scats of not Less then one (1) inch squats one—hundred (100) feet nor more then one (1) inch equals _ -teensy- (201 •rent—•shawl-rg--ttte Land which is propee-ed. to be rezoned. eb. A. Legal. description of the Land proposed to be rezoned. - `c. A statement of Justification addraoeing one or ware of the - foLtattting: - (1) The a LLeged error in the Zoning Ordinance, if any, which wouLd be corrected by the proposed amendment with a dataiLed explanation of such error in the Zoning AtLas and deteiLad reasons hoer the proposed amendment wi tl correct the error. (2) The changed or changing conditions, i-f any, in the arse or in the County generally, which make the proposed . amendment reasonably necessary to the promotion of the public health, safety and were!. welfare. e(3) The manner in which the proposed amendment sill carry out • the intent and purpose of the adopted Land Una Plan or . part . . .•-- thereof. e(a) ALL other circumstances, factors and r0000ne which the applicant offers in support of the proposed apendeeet - incLuding, but not Limited to, documentation Prop service - agencies (e.g. fire, police, rescue and utiLitios agencies) - --• assuring services provision capability to the deveLepoent. d. A List of aLL individuals, firms or corporations owning property -- adjoining or within five hundred (5001 feet of the property - sought for. rezoning is attached. The List is currant as of (Oasa7 I certify that all information furnished in this application is accurst -o the best of my knowledge . pp l i cant ( s ] . Spence & Lyn Dickinson :address : Rt 8 Box 92K Mill liote Chapel Hill. N.C, 27516. :'` :than e . 933-9080 • • • • • • 042 .LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEGINNING at an iron , the northwest corner of the property now or formerly owned by William A. Newman , Jr. , in the line of the property now or formerly owned by Chapel Hill Policeman's Association , and running thence with the line of the aforesaid Association North 01 degrees 54' 33" East 1000.00 feet to an iron in the line of Duke University Forest; running thence a new line South 78 degrees 11 , 43". East 1602.58 feet to an iron , thence South 83 degrees 21 ' 14" East 11 6.40 feet to an iron , thence North 69 degrees 34' 13" East 104.54 feet to an iron , thence South 05 degrees 02' 44" West 726.12 feet to an iron in the line of property now or formerly owned by Martin Bernholz; running thence with the Bernholz line North . 84 degrees 05' 31" West 296.27 feet to. an iron , thence South 04 degrees 48' 34" West 112.63 feet to an iron , thence North 85 degrees 38' 16" West . 1451 .79 feet to an iron , the point and place of. Beginning, and being all of Phase 1 , HEARTWOOD, according to survey and plat thereof recorded in Plat Book _,_, at Page , Orange County Registry, to which plat reference is hereby made for a more particular description, together with a perpetual. easement and right of way for purposes of ingress, egress and regress and the installation and maintenance of .utilities over and across the road running from the aforesaid described tract or parcel of land to S.R. 1725 as shown- on the aforesaid plat. . • • • • 044 . AN' OVERVIEW OF THE HEARTWOOD PROJECT t Fon the past 14 Years I have gained va.2uab!e expvc.ience owning and managing a Damay-ottiented apatr tnent community in Chape.2 Hite. AZ. o, I spent 4. yeatcs . . • own.i.ng and ape/rating a da.i.4y f attm whvte I did extensive gaad en ng and f wun ing. . At the dai r.y il arrm T a s o bet up a comp Bete s awrrLC tt and picov i.ded an app nent ice- sh.i.p pnognarn Son the student dtcap-acts from'.tie At2amance County school system. In the £ast 3 yeatcs I have owned and managed the Santrise Fmmez's torket, a • . . pttoduce and natwca! pods gnaceny stone in this community. O:2ange County- was whvice my ance4.s anb, -the. Thampsonb, 4e.: Zed in 1752. Orange Coun y .s.S my home and has been f ac 16 yea/Es. My Lain-ty and I p.Zan to stay. We p. n to. stay and con.t t.Lbctte to the .cmpnoveinent and stab.0 ty o f th is- corrrmun ty .as did my ancestotrs. HEARTWOOD is my canrnitnent to pees enve. a aes pe.c t f ac .the-Zand and its • nvs ounee4 and La a f f e t a gaze where a vatc,i.et y o6 ac to v.c.ues and teaming • - expvc ienc2s can take puce. A pace -whvice the values of the f ami ey fatm can f.2.ocvt,ish, in spite of -a,ts decline as an econornica22y viable .tiSea $e tizat . the fatcm used to o{f vz many Ametc i.cans. HEARTWOOD a LU be a safe peace where both adu.e s and ch.i.2cftc.en can gnaw towa'cds theca gu.etes t potenti..at. Today's - devetopments osSetc ecthetc high density comp.eexes a4 e ite and sepaicate neigh-. • bonhoods with Zaii.ge hzdividua$. Land holdings; nec thex oi which faster a tAtte - serwe of petcsonc - tenaation nan coopenatc:on, , but na ken p'comotes oney a sense o f sepattateneas and feats o6 one own neighbor.. Thaoccgh f astelring. a • . eat rent,_ a f ee2,ing a{ peas ona2 4.es pon4 ibie ty, and e ncocvcaghiq commute ty -• •. shatr,i.ng HEARTWOOD w:c.2 a maize a di f f enence. _ . - . Theta cute many peap'e who ate .in f Yvon 06 a mace. balanced emthumment .and want the opportunity to ex.peic i•ence a mope wholesome and -f u.2 f.cL2ing tiLestyee, . • in view oL today's hectic pace many peopee. ate Looking for,. that whaLesame type. . neighborhood. -HEARTWOOD i4 designed with just such people in rru,td.-A school,.• . . . - a Zoc:.2 mattke t, a f antiiey homestead, a take and waod2ands, Sa.= animcas, and woithshaps o API LhLS w.i.ZZ .involve and .inspi'ce'bath young and ad. This .bwo2ve.- meat caiZZ natwcatty encautcag a ate to be active and en f o y each o theic's -company. Thvice TL . be skills to Leatn and pass on and na tuae .to enjoy untouched and - . • .. • ' protected. A4 envisioned, HEARTWOOD tep tes ents a unique oppoatuAity fan the . . .people of Orange County; a velty worthy addition to thi:/S community. . Re4 pec t6utty submitted; <C(- F. . `;- - Spence M - w •• k- r.s.f,u7s3c. 0 4,4- General Contractors -�-� j.) .. . - John D. Hartley, P,es. N.C. l..ic. !'ay. 1O 2 - . 919-S8 -0022 Design Et Conga of Solar Er S•u 1irls Fit BOX 5'i So :hatter /4111k\\\ Chapel Hill, N. C. 27514 • Spence and Lyn Dickinson April 11, 1986 Heartwood Rt 8 Box 92x Chapel Hill, N.C. 27514 • Eddie Kirk - Orange County Planning Department - - - Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 • RE: Special Use Permit Heartwood at Blackwood Mountain " - Dear Eddie, We are please) to submit this narrative in support of our application for a PD-HRI Special Use Permit for the development, HEARTWOOD at BLACKWOOD MOUNTAIN. For the past 14 years we have gained valuable experience owning and managing a family oriented apartment community in Chapel Hill. Also, we have spent 4 years owning and operating a dairy farm where we did extensive gardening and farming. . At the dairy farm, we also set up a complete sawmill and provided an apprenticeship program for the student drop-outs from the Alamance County school system. In the last .3 years we have owned and managed the SUNRISE FARMERS MARKET, a produce and natural foods grocery store in this community. Orange County was where our ancestors, the Thompson, settled in 1752. Orange County - is our home and has been for 16 years. Our family plans to stay and to contribute to the improvement and stability of this community as did our ancestors. HEARTWOOD is our commitment to preserve a respect for the land and its resources and to offer a place where a variety of activities and learning experiences can take place. A place where the values of the family farm can flourish, in spite of its decline as an economically viable lifestyle the the farm used to offer many- Americans. HEARTWOOD will be a safe place. where both adults and children can grow towards their fullest potential. Today's developments offer either high density complexes or elite and separate neighborhoods with large individual land holdings; neither of which foster a true sense of personal interaction nor cooperation, but rather promotes only a sense of separteness and fear of one's own • neighbor. Through fostering a commitment, a feeling of personal respons- iblity, and encouraging community sharing HEARTWOOD will make a difference. - There are many people who are in favor of a more balanced environment and want the opportunity to experience a more wholesome and fulfilling lifestyle. In view of today's hectic pace many people are looking for that _ .. •4 � • 0 E i8 ny2nCoi General Con re t "# John D. Hartlsy, Pres. N.C. Lic. l lo. 1033'2 • ' J 519-958-0022 Design Et Construction of Solar Et Superinsulated Rt.8 Box 516o Shelter 11/111.k\\\\ impel Hill, N. C. 27514 • • wholesome type neighborhood. .HEARTWOOD is designed with just such people in mind: A school, a local market, a family homestead, a lake and. woodlands, farm animals, and workshops. All this will involve and inspire both .young_ and old. This involvement will naturally encourage all to be active and enjoy each other's company. There••will he- skills to learn and pass on and nature to enjoy untouched and protected. • As envisioned, HEARTWOOD represents a unique opportunity for the - people of Orange County; a very worthy addition to this . community. • It is because of these ideals that we have chosen a plumed development, over a conventional lotted subdivision. We submit the attached plans, evaluations, letters, and checklist as evidence of our commitment to create a quality living environment. in harmony with the wishes of Orange County residents and incom- pliance with the guidelines .of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance. Respectfully submitted, (9.1.11 • Spe ce Dickinson • Oftrj. Lyn Dickinson • • • • • • • • 04t • • • TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY HEARTWOOD A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT- - Iht . ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH_ CAROLINA - • • • APRIL 11,. 1986 - _ PROJECT NO. 8SGO. PREPARED FOR: . SPENCE AND LYNN DICKINSON AND ERS, INC. - ROUTE 8, BOX 516C - - CHAPEL HILL, NORTH CAROLINA 27514 -- - • • • PREPARED SY - • PHILIP POST AND ASSOCIATES, INC. • ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS _. CHAPEL HILL, NORTH CAROLINA - - • PHILIP •POST ET ASSOCIATES • • �1G1ME.c+7S/Pt NNEFt9/SURVEYORS O 4 s • • #88601 • April 11, 1986 • • • 'TRANSPORTATION IMPACT REPORT Heartwood Residential Development - Applicant: Spence and Lynn Dickinson ERS, Inca • Route 8, Box 576C Chapel Hill, N.C. 27514 Purtnose: • Thia report will determine the affect of the Heartwood - Development on the traffic on Mill House Road CSR 1725) . Procedure: 1. Determine the road conditions " .a) Pavement and lane widths b) Existing grades c) • Site distances d) Type of intersection e) Shoulders f) Surface condition g) • Alignment 2. Determine- traffic factors a) Number of trucks b) Number of buses c) Lane distribution • d) Variation in traffic flow e) Traffic interruptions - - 3. Determine existing traffic conditions (Do traffic counts) . 4 . Tr•awic generation by project 488501 • Transportation Impact Repo ' April 11, 1986 • Page Two 046 5. Analyze- data • • 6. Conclusion and recommendation - - - • Data: - • The existing road is an NCDOT gravel road with approximately 18 feet of gravel pavement and variable shoulder and ditch dimensions. The road is two lane but is not striped for lanes. . The site distances for the most- part are good and fall below critical vertical. alignment factors specified by NCDOT. The - alignment and grades. do not affect the current flow of traffic. There are two on-grade crossings of the very lightly used (once per week) Southern Railroad tracks. The crossings are not automatically controlled, but do provide good sight distances and. proper crossing alignments. _ - . Traffic projections indicate that the proposed lane - distribution is not. constant. The inbound lanes carry the _ majority of traffic in the morning and the outbound lanes carry the traffic in the afternoon. There are no traffic - interruptions due to the volume of traffic. he number of - . trucks is approximately 2%. of the total traffic, and is not a - _ factor during the peak .periods of the day. Actual traffic counts are broken down on an hourly .basis in . Appendix A. The counts were made at the entrance of :the - . development. - : Proposed Develoament: The proposed development contains 78 acres of undeveloped woodlands and is proposed to . be developed into approximately. 40 single family lots, 1.2 townhouse rental apartment units, and 26 senior citizen townhouse cluster homes, for a total of 78 residential units on 78 acres or one unit per acre density. Site amenity features will include horse and farming . facilities to remain, a 2.5 acre lake, picnic area, riding . trails, garden plots and playground. The development will be - nearly self-sufficient from the standpoint of active and passive recreation uses. • #88601 Transportation Impact Report April 11,. 1986 Page Three • AA • Tha site is located on the west side of. Mill House Road CSR 1725) adJacent to the 1-40 right of way and approximately 4,000. feet from NC 86 at Blackwood Station. Trio Generation: According to the Institute of Traffic Engineer's Trip Generation Report, the single- family units will generate 10 trips per unit, the apartments will generate 6.1 trips per unit and a townhouse will generate- 3.3 trips per unit. - This- development will generate: - 1. Single family .C40 units) x 10 trips = 400 2. Apartments C12 unite) x 6.1 trips 72 3 Townhouses C26 units) x 3.3 u 86 - TOTAL . 558 • Four lv Distribution Factors: _ Peak Hour Residential Apartment - Townhouses. _ 7:00 - 9:00 AM Enter: .3 .1 .1 Exit : .6 .5 .4 4:00 - 6:00- PM - Enter: .7 .4 .4 Exit : - .4 . .2 . .2 Actual Distribution: 7:00 - 9:00 AM (Total: 16) Enter: 12 1 - 3 (Total: 40) Exit : 24 6 - to 4:00 - 6:00 PM (Total: 43) Enter: 28 5 _ 10 (Total : 23) Exit : 16 2 5 088501 .. Transportation Impact Report • April 11,• 3988 " Page Four • Existing Road Conditions: • Per the NCDOT manual "Highway Capacity", levels of service and maximum service- volumes on a two-lane highway under uninter- rupted flow- conditions (Normally representative of rural . operations) . • Flow in both directions Level of Service: Descrintion per hour El -Free f low 400 cars 8 • Stable flow 900 cars - C Stable flow 1400 ears D Approaching unstable - _ - flow - . 1700 cars - E Unstable= flow 2000 cars - F Forced flow _ . widely. variable * See Appendix 8 for definitions. Deterrainatio of Intersection Cana t The- intersection capacity analysis for use in site planning _- application is based on the "Critical Movement Summation" technique developed by McInerney and Petersen. Table II gives the capacity ranges of an intersection for each level of service. • Intersection Capacity by Level of Service - . Level of Service Ranee of Cam ac.it (VP!!) Low High . . A - " 0 9O0 901 1050 C 1051 1200 D - 1201 1350 E 1351 1500 F (Special case) 1500 - • X5641 ._. Transportation Impact Report April 11, 1956 Page Five 051 - - Mill House Road 24 Site • 10 Entrance ^ 6 7:00 - 9:00 A.M. Traffic • Mill House Road 14 • 26 �. Site 17 - 4:00 - 6:00 P.M. - Entrance • Traffic / • _ _ #85601 Transportation Inpact' Repart April 11, 1986 - - - Pace Six • • .05' • • Data Comnarisor:: • Level of Service (Road), " Current Use Proposed Use - A - 400 cars 15 81 - - • B. - 900 cars between between. _. C -- 1400 cars 4:00-.6:OOPM _ 4:00-6:C0PM D a 1700 cars -E - 2000 cars • e .._.._� F _ - - Level of Service «Intersection)_ Current Use - - Proposed Use Low Hiah A - 0 900 . 901 1050 0 ' - _66 C 1051 • . 1200 ' driveway not • - -betwee.rn - D . 11201 1350 mide - - 4:00--6:OOPM . • E 1351 1500 F Special. Case- - Suggested Improvements: Several lots, a restaurant, farms, a plant nursery and other subdivision -developments now feed on to Mill House Road. • The new subdivision streets for the proposed Heartwood _ - Development will be paved in accordance with County Standards. - Due to the low traffic volume generated by Heartwood and the . existing very low volumes on Mill House Road, no intersection _ improvements are recommended for the new subdivision access - street. This proposed intersection will- be a 90 degree "T" intersection with good sight distances in both directions. Mill House Road is now on _Orange County's priority list for - paving by NCDOT. The Developer will use his good offices to. - . encourage NCDOT to pave the road as- soon as possible and to - • - bring the entire roadway up to the best State standards. ' - . #88601 • Transportation Impact Report - - April 11, 1986 Page Seven 05 Conclusion:, Service level "C'° is considered to be an acceptable level of service- in Orange County per conversations with the planning staff. Roads of higher standards are over designed. Per the numbers shown- in the: previous pages, the level of service for this road and intersection is above the "C" service level.. It is- therefore concluded that the increase oS traffic from this development. will not adversely affect that level of Service of this road. - • • • • • • • . #88601 • • • Transportation Impact Report April 11, 1986 Page. Eight • - : 054. Appendix "A" Time- April 4. 1986 7:00 _ 7:30 AM - 7 7:30 8:00 AM 3 8:04 d 8:3o AM 6 _ 8:30 a 9:00 AM 3 • 4:00 - 4:30 PM 7 • 4:30 .. 5:.00 PM g 5:00 - 5:30 PM 1 5:30. - 6:00 PM : 4 • Appendix ..B.. Oneratino Can ditions for Levels of Service:, Level of Service A: This is a condition of free flow, accompanied by lore volumes and high speeds. Level of Service B: This occurs in the zone of stable flaw, - with operating speeds beginning to be restricted somewhat by traffic conditions. Level of Service C: This is still in the zone of stable flow, but speeds and maneuverability are more closely controlled by the higher volumes_ • Level of Service D: This level of service approaches unstable flaw, with tolerable operating speeds being maintained, though. considerably affected by changes in operating conditions. Level of Service E: This cannot be described by speed alone, - but represents operations at lower operating speeds, typically, but not always, in the neighborhood of 30 miles per hour, with volumes at or near capacity of the highway. Level of Service F: This describes a forced-flow operation at low speeds, where volumes are below capacity. In the extreme, both speed and volume can drop to zero. . Li.bb : . i \ PHIL1P POST & ASSOCIATES),IN ti, .. . . P Engineers/Plafiners/Survoyors wr .i ` ' 401 Providence Road Suite 200 o CHAPEL HILL. NORTH CAROLINA 27514 /009 86 • . - (919) 929.1173 or 493-2600 Yom _ a ril 1 ° 1TE SAP • • • ° s " I -. - -� /, SCARLETTE MTN. �� �c.t_N. _ PAGE 9 '� RD, v. ..�aR� I Sao . � �- 014 rog- . .o RO. _� (0w oc . O / 1722 r - .-„ CHEYENNE 7 `` / Hiilsboraugh DF�- I0�9 R 3 / \ . d' �I�-L /720 «, �' ��o S Pt's R�c'�' J 3/ ,� /790 ;=.'$ tp 89 1 °- ;I) /778 h op ! j3i1sbgrough. • w_ - 4 11!1 J �°�. ARM Rt.2 ,Chop iii! R t. 9 $-.-!j': t - " .c U1.4* - Blackly bd c -.8 G Q10KE •I f /72 - Saxon FOREST l ,� 18x9 /730 ---, "Zk6 ' -4 .. . C fi A P E; g . -:. ��• -`` !. �� DISTRICT `d �, ::.. • 1 Wto P � P°aL • t 4 + /725"\ - - • .�1:. ® `_ /727 , � ° , /72 "' M,, ' t 1 . 1 0 d _, /732 �nope1 1 . G' : .;_'f 64VER/733 OM R1. 2 /729 dpi ` •� �r /73 ..._ _ / .�-. cm :� R 1. 4 / . \ ��'z~z. Hr L J /777 / er• _ , SR Hlt;� L. No _� _ LAKE I,--,r-, ,� ?` _ r . . _ - 300 W.Tryon Street _... _. :`;z,. - rr .. _ 'Osborn*,N.C.2726 5 t i. 732-3191 A. • . -c� .. .�f =-.woe ': [^ ;- - - ' • cr •.xx;; r.-,•• "• 7329351 ext.305 4.DEPARTMENT P Chapel Lie 957-9251 Mebane line 227=2032 Durham Erse 688-7333 688.7331 . Carr Mill Mall.Suite 225 100 N.Greensboro Street Canboro.N.C.27510 ' 942-4168 • ' - Jerry Robinson,M.P.A. Director TO: Susan Smith .c?bit . . • FROM: Ron Holdway DATE: May 21, 1986 . . - RE: Heartwood Development - - I have completed preliminary soil evaluations at the proposed Heartwood . Development. Tentatively, there are 27 individual sites that are approved for sewage disposal systems. These sites are only preliminarily approved. . - -sites still must be given ,final approval before any permits can be 'issued. Final approval is contingent on a field survey showing all lines and our department's confirming that the usable areas are still usable for the parti- '.cular sites. - One aspect of the development that may create problems is that the dedicated lots may not be large enough to contain all- of the usable septic • • system area and repair area. This aspect leads to the legal questions of system ownership, maintenance, and repair responsibilities. None of the sites may be permitted until these legal questions are resolved. • please call if you have any questions concerning this matter: . . - . RH:car . • • - • • • • • • • • • { CAW ENGITI:SdRING TESTING COMPANY 5 r'' geolechnical,environmental&conshuceon mate dsconyVWgs • 05 3301 ATLANTIC AVENUE • P.O. BOX 18288 • RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA 27619 (919) 876-0416 April 7, 1986 - ERS, Inc. Route 8 , B516C Chapel Hill, NC 27514 • Attention: Mr. John Hartley • • Subject: Report of Preliminary Soil Evaluation for • On-Site Sewage Disposal Systems - • LETCO Job No. : J47286--1634 Dear Mr. Hartley: - • Law Engineering Testing Company is pleased to submit our report of the preliminary soil evaluation for your review. lie were . authorized on April 3 , 1986 to perform hand auger borings on selected lots . at the proposed Heartwood Development near Chapel Hill, North Carolina. The site is located on Blackwood Mountain approximately one mile southeast of Blackwood Station near N.C. 86 . The lots to be evaluated and the hand auger boring locations were selected by Mr. Hartley or Mr. Dickinson during the evaluation. Lot numbers correspond to the drawing entitled "Sketch Plan" which was used during the field exploration. Soil descriptions for each lot ' evaluated are presented in Table 1 . _ Generally, the proposed home--sites are situated on slopes of greater than 15 percent, although small areas within the study area may be less than 15 percent. According to NCAC Title 10 , Chapter 10, Subchapter 10A, slopes between 15 and 30 percent can -• be considered provisionally suitable if the soils are at least 36 inches deep. Generally , the soils encountered at the site consist of approximately 5 to 7 inches of brown loam and silt loam. The subsoil is a silty clay or clay to a depth of • approximately 36 inch es. At lots 1 , 2, 16, 22, and 23 , either rock or saprolite was encountered at shallower depths. Based on our observations of soil properties at the lots evaluated, , and in accordance with NCAC Title 10 , Chapter 10 , Subchapter 10A, Law Engineering would rate each of the lots evaluated as provisionally suitable for on-site waste disposal . Lots with soils shallower than 36 inches were observed to have • • ERS, Inc. April 7, 1986 Page 2 05 1 • suitable soil properties 'for low pressure pipe systems. An of the lots evaluated will require that the nitrification lines be placed at a depth of less than 36 inches due to the moderate soil depth to rock or saprol ite. Placement of the nitrification field piping at a depth of. approximately 18 inches from the soil surface will take advantage of the loamy textures generally encountered at this depth at the site. Since most of th nitrification fields are located up slope from the proposed dwellings, these systems will require a pump and pump tank in addition to the septic tank and nitrification field piping. Due - to the shallow placement and the pump requirements, low pressure pipe systems are the type of on—site system Law Engineering recommends for the project. In addition, we recommend the use of water conservation toilets at each _ proposed home—site. These toilets substantially reduce - _ the amount of water to be treated by the system. The toilets generally work using a small air compressor and usually flush approximately one gallon of water per flush cycle. Conventional toilets flush about five gallons of water per cycle. We appreciate the opportunity to provide these services for your project. If you have questions or if we can be of further assistance, please contact us. • Very truly yours, . LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY - Fred D. Smith . • Soil Scientist lan Tice, P. E. - : '- -• Senior Geotechnical Engineer •;- Registered, North Carolina .6428 •' •FDS/JAT/sar ; i t • • _.. .«,_ _ ._._..__. .�.. .._..... ......« .�.---•.�...._.....�.....�� ---- .W.� .w..,.�.._...,�...-_.._._. _ Raw gMery=_e++inc • • 05 • TABLE 1 a. SOIL DESCRIPTIONS ' HEARITIOOD DEVELOPMENT LETCO JOB NO. J47286--1634 t i LOT Depth (Inches) Color, Texture Structure CQRsistency, 0 -- 5 Brown Loam Granular 5 -- 30 Yellowish-red Clay loam Subangular. Slightly sticky, blocky slightly plastic Rock at 30 inches. LOT '•2 ' I0 -- 5 Brown Loam Granular 5 -- 30 Yellowish-red Clay loam Subangular Slightly sticky, blocky slightly plastic . Rock at 30 inches. 1 LOT 3 0 -- 8 Brown • Loam Granular . 12 - 20 Brown clay Loam Angular blocky 12 - 36+ Yellowish-red Clay Angular Slightly sticky, blocky - slightly plastic No rock encountered at 36 inches. - LOT 4 0 -- 7 Strong brown Loam Subangular blocky } 7 -- 36+ Dark reddish-- Silty clay Angular Slightly sticky, brown blocky slightly plastic No rock encountered at 36 inches. 3 - 1 • LAW ENGIN!aIY.hC .r.. r 999 n Table 1 06C Page Two i LOT 6 _ 1 1 Depth (Inches) Color, Texture Structure Consistency • 0 -- 7 Strong brown Loam Granular 7 -- 36+ Reddish-brown Silty clay Angular Slightly sticky, blocky slightly plastic No rock encounttered at 36 inches. LOT8 • 1 0 - 7 Strong brown Loam d 7 - 36 Reddish-brown Silty clay Angular Slightly sticky, blocky - slightly plastic = No rock encountered at 36 inches. • E t i LOT 10 0 - 7 Strong brown Loam Granular 7 - 36+ Reddish-brown Silty clay Angular Slightly sticky, • slightly plastic No rock encountered at 36 inches. LOT 12 • 0 -- 3 Brown Sandy loam Granular 3 - 12 Strong brown Clay loam Angular Slightly sticky, ! blocky slightly plastic i 1 12 - 36+ Strong brown Clay • Angular Slightly sticky, • 1 blocky slightly plastic No rock encountered at 36 inches. F f tt 1 f r i 2 UV*ewx e.ziKG. - 4._. a - �_ .._ - - 1E5Ir‘G Cdlrpph• -,�•� --�.-- 061 Table 1 Page Three LOT5 i Depth : (Inches) Color Texture Structure - Consistency 0 -- 15 Strong brown Loam Granular 15 -- 36+ Strong brown Clay loam Angular - - Slightly sticky, blocky . slightly plastic No rock encountered at 36 inches. LOT 7 0 - 6 Brown sandy Loam Granular 6 - 36+ . Yellowish-red Clay . Subangular Slightly sticky, blocky slightly plastic I No rock encountered at 36 inches. LOT 9 0 - 10 . Brown Sandy loam Granular . 10 - 36+ Yellowish-red Clay Angular Slightly sticky, blocky slightly plastic - No rock encountered at 36 inches. 1 - LOT 11 . 0 - 10 Brown Sandy loam Granular = I 10 36+ Yellowish-red Clay Angular Slightly sticky, i slightly plastic No rock encountered at 36 inches. LOT13 0 - 36+ Yellowish-red Cl ay Angular Slightly sticky, 1 blocky slightly plastic No rock encountered at 36 inches. - 1 F 3 1, I • i 064. Table 1 i r Page Four 1 t LOT14 Depth _anchesI 'Color. Texture Structure . Consistency 0 -- 10 Brown Sandy loam - Granular 10 -- 36+ Yellowish- red Clay Angular 'Slightly sticky,. blocky slightly plastic No rock encountered at 36 inches, rock common on the surface: LOT 16 0 -- 5 . Brown. Sandy clay Blocky 5 - 24 Yellowish-red Silty clay Angular . . Slightly sticky, - blocky slightly plastic 24 - 36+ Saprolite Loam . ' Massive . . No rock encountered at 36 inches. t 1 LOT 17 - - - • - - 0 - 36+ Yellowish-red Clay Angular ' Slightly sticky, slightly plastic No rock encountered. LOT 15 i 0 - 10 Brown Sandy loam Granular 10 -- 36+ Yellowish-red Clay Angular Slightly sticky, blocky - slightly plastic No rock encountered. i J . . . 4 �-. { LAY/E....,ENiKG 1 I 00%- 1 Table l Page Five LOT 19 Depth (Inches) Color Texture Structure Consistency 0 - 5 Brown Sandy loam Granular 5 -- 36+ Yellowish-red Clay loam Angular Slightly sticky, blocky slightly plastic t No rock encountered. - LOT21 0 -- 10 Brown Loam Granular 10 - 36+ Yellowish-red Clay Angular Slightly sticky, 4 slightly plastic No rock encountered. I i LOT 23 1 0 --- 8 Brown Loam Granular 8 - 30 Yellowish-red Clay Angular Slightly sticky, slightly plastic 30 - 36+ Saprolite Loam - . Massive No rock was encountered to a depth of 30 inches. LOT 25 8 0 -- 5 Brown Loam Granular 5 - 36+ Yellowish-red Clay Angular Slightly sticky, blocky slightly plastic No rock encountered. 0 F I 1 5 L �_x r — low W'n=E11r+C. . , , F---- . . 06 Ta bl e I Page Six i 4 LOT 27 I Depth (Inches) Color Texture Structure , Consistency 0 - 5 Brown Loam - Granular - 5 - 36+ Red Clay Angular Slightly sticky, slightly plastic No rock -encountered at 36 inches. - LOT 22 0 -- 8 Brown Loam Granular 8 - 30. Red Clay. Angular Slightly sticky, t blocky slightly plastic 30 - 36+ Saprolite Loam Massive I 1 e LOT 20 I 0 — 8 Brown Loam Granular - - - x 8 - 36+ Red Clay Angular Slightly sticky, 5: - blocky slightly plastic No rock encountered at 36 inches. i I Os if 1 6 . y.._.... _ «.-.r.w. ��.��.^-«.....� ,...`_+.r.w-.r..- .ti. - LAW E',GIEEkr4G TESTING G'O�agyY • l Obi �� -�•,�f ft�7 o. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • Graham, NC 27253-0766 JAMES G. MARTIN GOVERNOR July 3, 1986 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS JAMES E. HARRINGTON SECRETARY • Orange County Mr. Marvin Collins Orange County Planning Department " 106 East Margaret Lane Hillsborough, NC 27278 Subject: Preliminary Plait for Heartwood Subdivision - Off SR 1725, Mill House Road Dear Mr. Collins: This is to advise that approval is given for the pre liminary plank for the above development. If there are any questions, please advise. . Yours very truly, • - 2 . )`Y. Mills 'ISTRICT ENGINEER . JN I/JSH:j bh • An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer sue+ LT-30-8c. ID) • M• �r • • STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT.OF TRANSPORTATION O 6 E - Graham, NC 27253-0766 - JAMES G. MARTIN GOVERNOR May 29, 1986 DIVISION OF.HIGHWAYS JAMES E.HARRINGTON SECRETARY • Orange County Ms. Susan Smith, Planner Orange County Planning Department I06 East Margaret Lane Hillsborough, NC 27278 • • Subject: Preliminary Approval for Heartwood at Blackwood Mt. • • - Dear Ms. Smith: -Per our earlier conversation, the only approval that can be given at this time is the number and configuration of lots on Heartwood Drive and Heartwood Court. These do meet our guidelines. There is some question about the "drive" at the end of the cul-de-sac on Heartwood Court. This will be reviewed when the correct preliminary plans are submitted. • In order to approve the preliminary plans for Heartwood at Blackwood Mt., it Will be necessary to have the horizontal curve data on the plans. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact this office., • Yours very truly, • . M. Mills DISTRICT ENGINEER - JIIM:jbh • • • • An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer • - 061 - r • r . • - 73 ' D. :iartIe.y, • 1, C. o. ltr.22 - z 59E4022 -1- -2' 2.1 of e nt. 8 "Z;...tx U.1% •. '4\\ 11;1, H. C. 21::14 • • • • April 3, 1936 Warren Faircioth Erosion I:r.,ntrol Officer Orange C..-)unty 106 East Margaret • Hillsborouch, N.C. 27302 RE: EecsTon control inforriation nef.ed for Heartwood Development's - Srec'.al Use Pe;-mit Application Dear Mr. rcloth: . . It is ivy understanding from our Tuesday April 1 r.Eeting that the • following information should be noted on the Heartwood plans to be submitted •twil 11 for a special use nermit: 1 . Sedi,ent trap and stone filter at the crossing of the . entry road and creek bed. • 2. F=d: ,ent 3. Ei-d-:rent trap in the sr of tor of the entry road and hill It is also my understanding that construction details and specifications - are not required for this submittal , but will be, before p - it s- are issued. If I have omitted or misunderstood any of our Teating, please let me know as soon as possible so I can make any correction in time • - for the April 11 submittal deadline. Truly, John D. Hartley, Pres. JDH/jds • • - pNT ELEc .. � � 06 -6 Q�iPv"1 '/r, GENERAL OFFICE • P.O.DRAWER 7179 • HILLSBOROUGH,N.C.27278 •-.- ti'-_- ~i}..3�fi23 ; vet :.f :';:43'i:' fr7-;-r". x21 t+- + .Y_�•I-1," !.Y��i,�iTw�0L`', 1:—Y K' +-, !--� si _ �Y '+*ec.' ;;.T:r ~ N.C.32-PERSON - -?-j P CO 9- BRANCH OFFICE • P.O.BOX 7327 • ROXBORO.N.C.27573 April 10, 1986 • . Property of Spence & Lynn Dickinson - _ - Heartwood at Blackwood Mountain To Whom It May Concern: - Piedmont Electric Membership Corporation will be more than happy to serve the property of the Dickinson's ; that's • located on state road # 1.725, MiliHouse Road. . We will serve this property with overhead or underground service under the Piedmont Electric Membership Corporation's policy, at the time they will be needing the service. ' If you have any questions about this, please call or write. Thank , vim' rat _' _ . • Walter Parker Engineering Supervisor WP/at ORANGE COUNT Y . cc w HILLSBOROUGH 0 O NORTH CAROLINA 27278 • EMERGENCY SERVICES 106 EAST MARGARET LANE Established 1752 M E M O R A N D U M TO: John Hartley FROM: Bobby Baker O. 0. _ SUBJECT: Emergency Services DATE: April 2, 1986 The proposed development of Heartwood to be located off Mill House Road on Blackwood Mountain is currently being provided E.M.S. coverage by Orange County Emergency Services and South Orange Rescue Squad. The New.Hope Volunteer.- Fire Department provides fire protection for this area pdg/BB • • • • • • LINDY PENDEIRGRASS 07C Sheriff of Orange County • Hillsborough, North Carolina, 2 72 78 Office Phone: Hillsborough 732-2431 Chapel Hill 942-6300 • Residence Phone: 929-5535 To: Orange County Planning Department - From: Sheriff Pendergrass • - Date: April 2, 1986 • Re: Law Enforcement Services For Heartwood At Blackwood Mountain For the fiscal year 1985, the Orange County Sheri•ff's Department responded to 14,404 calls for service .:countywide. County planning population figures show approximately 45000 persons listed within the County. Based on these figures the ratio of calls for service countywide -is ,32 per person. Countywide, the Sheriff's Department served 9,404 civil and criminal papers fora ratio of .21 papers per persons countywide. • The proposed Heartwood Development is in an an undeveloped oped area, therefore, a countywide average must be applied. - - Figures furnished by Spence Dickinson,. Lynn Dickinson and John Hartley indicate 78 new homes to be constructed. An average of 23 persons will occupy these new homes with a total population of 179 persons, . Based on a countywide average, 179: persons will generate (179x.32 57.a) 57.2 calls for service, using an average.:. of 45 minutes per call for a•total of 42.9 manhours for one year. . Based on a countywide average, 179 persons will generate (179x.21-37.5) papers served, using an average of 45 minutes per paper for a total of 28.1. manhours per year. 42.9 Manhours for Calls for Service 28.1 Manhours for Paper Service 71.0 Total Manhours for the Heartwood Subdivision - - For One Year. The addition of this proposed project and the projected 71 manhours will not by itself, cause a significant impact on the ability of. the Orange County Sheriff's Department to provide service for this area, however, this combined with other proposed projects in this area, could cause the need for additional manpower to maintain current level of service. 071 1J:range (lnunig Schools ya kEiGN� 200 EAST KINGSTREET HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA Z727B OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT - (919) 732-8126 April 16, 1986 Mr. John D. Hartley, President E. R. S. , Inc. - Rt. 8, Box 516c Chapel Hill, NC 27514 • - Dear Mr. Hartley: I am writing in response to your April 15, 1936, letter reference a residential planned development (38. proposed dwellings) -----Heartwood at Blackwood Mountain .(Grady A. Brown Elementary School District) . It has been our administrative policy not to express support for or opposition to any planned developments for dwellings. Our - responsibility is to serve the students within our system's atten- dance area. However, I would like to point out that as residential projects such as Heartwood at Blackwood Mountain continue to be built, a need for an additional school becomes more apparent. Additional dwellings provide additional students and we are quickly reaching capacity in our system for instructional, classroom space. Sincerely, Ira R. Trollinger, Ph.D. Assistant Superintendent for Instructional Services crm cc: Dan G. Lunsford, Superintendent, Orange County Schools Eddie Kirk, Orange County Planning Department 225 Green Street, Suite 606 - - F.yetteville, North Carolina 28301 ti A ° - (919) 486-1191 -. / [!� • . • • Y =21 "7 O I , • North Carolina Department of Human Resources - South Central Regional Office a Wachovia Building o 725 Green Street m Fayetteville,North Carolina 28301 James G. Martin, Governor . Phillip.). Kirk,Jr.,Secretary ' April 21, 1986 . • • • Orange County Planning Board Courthouse - Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 Attention: Mr. Eddie Kirk • • Dear Eddie: • .. - • • • Re: Well Site Investigation • Heartwood . Orange County - - • On Apri1.9, 1986, I met with Mr. John Hartley, and we looked over three well sites that he is proposing to use as sources of public water supply. - Mr. Hartley supplied me with a sketch plan, and it is my understanding that - the plan being submitted to your office is different; however, I will give an ' approximate location of the three sites from the northwest and. southwest corners of the property. Site #1 is located at the intersection of two lines, one drawn approximately 2000 feet east southeast of the northwest corner and the other approximately 1900 - feet northeast of the southwest corner. _ Site #2 is located at the intersection of two lines, one drawn approximately 2000 feet south southeast of the northwest corner and the other approximately 1500 feet east northeast of the southwest corner. - Site #3 is located at the intersection of two lines, one-drawn approximately ' 1200 feet southwest of the northwest corner and the other approximately 1300 feet ' north northeast of the southwest corner. The above-described well sites were verbally approved by me, and he has the - Division of .Health Services' permission to drill. Formal approval of the well sites cannot be given until the wells are drilled, - '. tested, and the following provisos met: . 1. The well owner must own or control the -property for a radius - - . - of 100 feet around the well casing. 2. No sewer or other source of pollution shall exist or be intro- '_ duced within 100 feet of the well. Dwellings, barns, etc., are considered to be potential sources of pollution. :'.n Equal Opportunity .affirmative Acoon!•:mpinrcr 07 tr • Orange County Planning Board . . • Page Two April 21, 1986 3. The ground surface around the well must be sloped so that water. will drain away from the well. • 4. Final approval of the well as a source of public water supply shall be based on the chemical and bacteriological quality of the water.- • Failure to comply with the above-listed provisos may result- in the disapproval . of the well sites. - Upon receipt of this letter and a well construction permit from the Division of Environmental Management, you may proceed with drilling operations. Upon com- pletion of the well construction, a twenty-four (24) hour capacity test must be conducted in accordance with requirements of the North Carolina Well Construction Regulations and Standards. Copies of the well completion record, water analysis, - pumping test, and three (3) copies of documents and exhibits as outlined in the "Guide for Obtaining Approval of Public Water Supply Systems" must be submitted to the Engineering Planning Branch, Division of Health Services in Raleigh. Until the plans and specifications have been reviewed and approved by the Division of Health Services, no construction on any portion of the water system, other than the wellhead, is to be carried out. The detailed plans and specifi- cations must be prepared by an engineer licensed to practice in the state of North Carolina. Since January 1972,. continuous disinfection of public water systems is also a requirement.. If additional assistance or information is desired from this office, please - do not hesitate to call on us. Sincerely, - - Robert E. Hallisey Environmental Technician - Water Supply Branch . . . Environmental Health Section REH/ps cc: Mr. W. E. Venrick Mr. Charles E. Rundgren Mr. F. K. Yarborough Orange County Health Department Mr. John Hartley • Orange County Planning Department - Orange County Commissioners - ' Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 • • - - To all whom. this Concerns; - Heartwood is the fulfillment of a long held vision and the practical - • application of 15 years personal experience. 1 would, like to express my intention-s in developing Heartwood. They are threefold. . One is to develop a small working homestead with my family where there. ' . ' are gardens, animal husbandry, 'worrdwoxking and related activities which are _ . a part of a family homestead lifestyle. Since we moved into the- "the old . BlackburnPlace" this past September we have begun substantial gardens; re.,- vived the many neglected. fruit trees, cleaned up and cared for the grounds, restored many of the outbuildings into useable condition; have the pleasure - - - of the antics of a young -Jersey Heifer, and the challenge of humble begin-- - ings. In essence ray:home is -a place to learn, to grow, and to share for my. own family and for others who may wish to participate,_ This brings me to the second aspect which is to involve children, • - In the decision to purchase this land 1 was very interested in helping the Emerson Waldorf School find a suitable place to build their school and • sold them a parcel of land on which to build. The Waldorf School philosophy and educational program lends itself well to being involved with a farm - . - environment. Many Waldorf Schools have adjoining a^farm situation which . - 'enhances many aspects of the children's school experience. My children both attend the Waldorf School and 1 find their enjoyment_ of school quite remarkable. - .. _. : • Thirdly, I want to develop a residential community where fami1ies.and individuals have theopportunity to participate in a lifestyle that restores many of the strong values and learning situations of the family farm yet offers privacy and, individual choice. A place where there can be a harmonious blend of respect 'for-'the -land and opportunity to participate in activities that - would not be available in most residential developments . For me and I know many others, there is more to life than one's work, TV, and health clubs! - Heartwood is my personal commitment to offer to those people who like me . - want to live in a neighborhood environment where. they can get involved, con-- tribute, and grow in ways seeminnfMestined to be forgotten in this fast paced- - age of computers and hi--tech living. _ . The center of Heartwood is a. lake and throughout the development there . " will be walking .trails to connect the residents with the schools my homestead1 - - • the lake,• the community building, play areas, and gardening areas. No - doubt any children attending the school will create their :own paths from ' home to school and to their favorite places in Heartwood, The homes at Heartwood will be carefully pla •ed-.so=.as to be neighborly but positioned in such a-way that will maximize privacy. Utmost care will be taken to preserve the woodland environment throughout. 1 .personally will be involved in ap- proving all site and building plans, any tree.removal and landscaping, ( 1 intend to work closely with the Heartwood Homeowners Association in • 07 t_ __ . •managing the community building, craft workshops, gardens, lake, and rec-- rea.ti.onal 'areas.to insure a high level of quality maintenance, safety and • t • enjoyment of the facilities at Heartwood. ' I would like to address the requests made of us regarding several aspects of our proposed development. Concerning the roads in general, we feel it would be in the best interest of the residents and the preservation of privacy and the special environment of Heartwood to build roads to private versus state standards. To have less right of way means preservation of trees .and increased • privacy in. a. situation where homes will already be fairly close together. Any savings in development costs as a result of private versus state roads we wouid.pasgon in-offering more affordable housing of which-there is a need ' is Orange County. _ . • " 6D In reference to paving the road to the community building we will be . requesting additional homesites for Heartwood and would prefer_to pave road at that time. . Traffic use on the road to the community building would be . light until later development occured. • - ' 6C - Regarding the requirement of including•a cul du sac after the parking . . area at the community building, we feel the nature of the facility being . , • private and small'would not-'require another turn around for fire and safety. . We have designed parking area with turn around and safety in mind. •There, would be.an access road to kitchen area of the community building for closer . access. ' Again, the• cost of a cul du sac adds considerable expense especially if paved to the small number of homes now under approval, - - kr We would like to defer final landscaping plans for the community building . r• "t,,_. and adjacent parking area until future submittal of application for community building permit because building plans are not final at this time. • 1 In reference to the bonding of the project road and utility costs we are : • submitting a letter of Heartwood's phases and development costs. We request ' that the bond/letter of credit .for development costs be for no more than • cost plus 10 % to cover each phases, one at a. time, - • SC Regarding septic, we request approval for the addition of adjacent ease- ments for the septic where lot won' t allow for nearby nitrification line and repair area. At this time there are only 4 lots in need of easements and areas have been approved by the Orange County Health Department. - • Blackwood Station is a very special part of Orange County. :As. residents - • of this •area since 1970 and as owners of Sunrise Farmers Market we present as an indication of our personal commitment to Orange County and its residents a development called Heartwood. We wanted to offer our community our service ' so we'.opened Sunrise in which we are active. owners and tnanagers..We are very excited about Heartwood not just because it is our home but because we feel Heartwood as it is envisioned will be a very worthy addition tb this community and t which will offer Orange County more than just another development. r . . It Respectfully subani •t d1. , 4- 1.44! . /C- C .�0 ,, Spebce H. Dickinson 44p4.,_.../Lyn A. Dickinson -W AFAR t WZIOD P . SES AND I)E4i;;�.tiPiiENT GISTS _ -' - - 1 ? As 07€ ._5r UNITS :N iiE�3,Ftii OC.s DRIvc - =0DAD$: - . • 5 ,s;vv.�7La - - -;ATE .. 36.000.u0 • r ll: ELECTRICITY: 10,000.00 - - . 3't37c'r1'L 533..000.00 - - - ?ii3SE II - - 14 UNITS BL CKWOOD MT3 ROAD - ROADS: : . s74,000..00 -. _ : - - - '4ATE : .: . 12 o 00. ELECTRICITY: - . . 3,200.00 _ t - : ODI -V LAKE, PICNIC AREA 6,000.00 - - - - .TRAIL ,RO ;ND LAKE - - - TOTAL X97,200.00 - _ -- - ==========as====aa========.,====aaaasat====atl aa.",,m7l.'. pp.2.-m r.wslza==p. - - 4 UNITS, LAKE, comm aLbc. - . - - .:ray'i'ER: 2,0 .00 - _ - - COMMUNITY Y GARDEN 3,.500.00 • . - - - COMMUNI s- BUILDING 60,000.00 - TOT LOT, CAMPING SITES 4,000..`x0 - - - - - e� s AL 592,000.00 - - - - - GRAND TOTAL: THREE. PNAS2S ::1#70,200.00 - a- - - - - - -..a as=aaa =a a a a a=a a=,a a a an.ams ..--- -aa = : c as - 3 iiE 1( AL DEVELOP,' N-c CCS i S ARE 8S-! H'i IAL- -1 t3Ei+. ricr2:i- ST IS WCESSA:-{' I OR 7;4E. trvCcESS OF T RZ PROJECT TO Pi7ASr. i i COST::.; ANtS tSt1476-.I?1L. •@rugt CEnunta 31erreatturn anh Var ,1m truent 0-. - 3pQ West 7rycn Street .•4b .�NILLSBORCUGi, N.C. 27278 Life. in— it_ • ;wary Anna Black Director - - o 1 t:2: Lit: si . - ",F'—e, is 'J TO: • Susan Smith, Planner III - • FROM: Mary Anne Black. 7 - - -. . - DATE: June 3, 1986 - - - RE: Heartwood — Proposed Planned Development - . - .- • . . • Upon review of the preliminary site plan : for .the 'proposed Heartwood ood _ Development, I find. only a couple of areas of concern from a recreat.io n and - park perspective. - - 1. The recreation facilities should be handicap accessible, in as. much as. possible. Handicap parking spaces and, if necessary, ramps :siould• • . '"- always be provided at recreation areas. All walking and hiking paths - k should be constructed to have no more than 5% slope. to acs date._ the irrf i rmed and -handicapped. - Handicap parking spaces should be barrier-free and identified for we by •individuals with physical disabilities. Spaces should be at least 12 - feet in width and should be designed as follows: a. So that handicapped individuals are not compelled to wheel or walk behind parked cars. b. So that handicapped individuals can get into and out of an automobile onto a level surface, suitable for wheeling and walking. c. In conjuction with sidewalk cut-aways and/or ramps, not exceeding. • five percent (5%) slope. . • • 2. The tot lot area should be defined/enclosed with a barrier- to prevent pre-schoolers from running out: into the trail and/or pond area. - 3. Riding/hiking trails require a minimum of 6-8 feet in width with a . minimum of an additional 2 feet either side and 10 feet over head clearance.. This allows for the multiple use for both riding and hiking. . Thank you for the opportunity to make these staff commnents.. I will present . ray recommendations to the Orange County Recreation and Parks Advisory Council . at their June meeting and will forward to you any changes/additional comments they may have.. - CC: Lorraine Parker, Chairperson . Orange County Recreation and Parks Advisory Council • Hillsborough, 732-9361 n Durham, 688-7333 . Chapel Hill, 968-4501 e Mebane. 2221--2C32 Area Code 919 - - - - - JuCy 1s.t, 1936 - .• Ona��ge County PZann.ing Board Q"7 1 O.'cali e Cc..unty Corn & .ssionen s -. • - Ylit.Csba.�ough, N.C. . To a.2L whom this eOnce uz ,We ane cuts ting this Letter neganding 'mot pnopos ed devetoment, ffeavr twood. We ate - adcGzess-Eng 3 neeomrnenda tion . .in hopes to better cean.ic y out A t.ten.tion,s. 1) Lots 1433634 a•'ce sepanaved {nom the main pant oc the development and cute Located neat the Lajun•'anew. These 2 -totes ate -inst u,cmerttat in OWL p&.ans OR -_ the ovenatL educational aspect oL ffeantwood. One-house wLeL be. the. La/un _ . managet!s house and the when Wit- be a bunk house ion use by those pan.tic- - _ - .ipa tng in 60A/rang and gardening pnol ects. - _ - _ -- 2) Regarding the toads hnoughaut Heantvoad and a5tet 'consul to Lon �T the . _ • .dunveyono and /toad buA.Zdens, the .eeommendations we. have iieceivect and aloe - .in agteemevct with art' loe the 6o P Zocv uzg: _ - a) The main enttcavcce, Healawood V'c.ive, we wooed have built to state - standatds and paved. b) Stackwood lttounta.uz Road which is the Loop toad would be bc►i.e..t -to . pn.ivate s.andatds and paved to state Standwcds. The main -conceAn hehe .vs to, pnov.ide adequate toad yet pteselcve the times and tvrivacy and nature of the hillside. A piu-vate toad would tequike tittle. to - no shauZden which would 'mean many times would -be. pne4eaved. The . aunveyofia and Woad builder said the scopes and ecvwes c ottZd be mono t. £tex ibte.wi th the bu building os a pn .vote standa'Ld 'Load and t to cost - . maintenance would be easily aiio;cdabte ion the number o6 house s.ite,s. c) As pteviousty, nequeisted, the toad to the Comnr►un ay tier ttl ng mould . be buie t according to pnLva to standards as"wed.and lit a Eaten phas e o% the development would be-paved at the time when WS cage a6 -the , -. - building would be. greater. _ - - 3) It has been neco►mnended to ws by the toad bu i.edens to buffed toad with cc 4 _.- -i.cch gnave.2 .base and maintain it until 90% o6 the homes ex ice built and then a ii.ina.2 2 inch .eaye/t o6 gnaveL be added and pavernen put down. This. - tecomrnend&.t on• was made'to avoid having the toad tot►i up by heavy equipment.. _ needed son: the building o6 the homes. It would alb o-benci t the Lutivte maintenance o6 the /toad .is compaction could tatze peace by use on the gn-ave t ted - •• bun5ace beLone pavement cea4 put down. This would save cos ey tepavcb to -.- a newly paved /toad. - • - -- Thank you {on con,idelcation -oL these neque.sts as .they aim in the best .inteaeist 06 - cneating a qua-U.4 development and one that-is cost ebsective {ion both the devetope'c _ _ and the homeowne'Ls. -- . - • - - • RespectCuEty sccbm-fitted, - - - - - Spence. Dickinson - - - j . - • - Lyre 'Dickinson - A • • - puke gn$llersitg . DURHAM O NORTH CAROLINA 27706 SCHOOL OF FORESTRY AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES TELEPHONE(910)684-2421 , OFFICE OF:THE DUKE FOREST July 18, 1 986 Ms. Susan J. Smith, Planner Orange County Planning Department - V 106 E. Margaret Lane - Hillsborough, NC 27278 • Dear Ms. Smith: I. appreciate the opportunity to comment on the proposed Heartwood Development beside the Blackwood Division of the Duke Forest. I would also like to- take this opportunity to thank the Orange County Planning Departamt and the Planning Board for their continued interest in protection of'the natural • resource values of the Duke Forest. - Prior to receipt of your letter, I had spoken with Barry Jacobs about the - project and subsequently met with Mr. Spence Dickinson, the applicant, who has explained his proposal to me. Basically, the number of dwelling units seems consistent with Uki. intent of the "Rural Residential" classification, and the positioning .of the iaomesites as indicated -on the preliminary site plan revised June 16, 1986 appears to leave a wooded buffer along the perimeter. A possible improvement to this would be . restrictive covenants protecting the buffer or some form of conservation . . easement. - Adequately designed septic systems should not effect water-'quality, though • Mr. Dickinson mentioned a package plant as a possibility for future developmental phases. That would be of some concern as it appeared to drain northward to a small stream eventually flowing to New Hope Creek. Otherwise, Mr. Dickinson's ideas are innovative and represent concern for multiple uses and provide a variety of amenities for the residents. I view the availability of the Duke Forest as a recreational :facility to . the residents of Heartwood in much the same manner as for others in the surrounding communities. It is available for hiking, jogging, picnicking and---- ___�_, _- general enjoyment of nature. I have included a Discover Duke Forest brochure which summarizes permitted uses. We prefer that access be gained through the system of roads and fire trails which allows us, to some extent, to direct • recreational use away from sensitive research projects or fragile ecosystems. This allows us to help protect study areas which our researchers consider important. We believe that we can provide these types of recreational benefits and still serve as an educational and research facility. I would be glad to answer any specific questions you may have;and again I appreciate the opportunity for input to the planning process. - - Sincerely, - Judson D. Edeburn Duke Forest Resource Manager • • JDE:lrr • Enclosure cc: Dr. George F. Dutrow, Dean w/o enclosure Mr. Barry Jacobs, Chairman, Orange County Planning Board • • MINUTES - - JOINT SESSION " ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS - 08C AND ORANGE 'COUNTY PLANNING BOARD MAY 27, 1986 The Orange County Board of Commissioners and the Orange County Planning Board met in joint session on May 27, 1986, 7:30 p.m. in Superior Courtroom, Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chair Don Willhoit and Commissioners Shirley Marshall, Moses Carey, Ben Lloyd and Norman Walker. ATTORNEY ABSENT: Geoffrey Gledhill. - STAFF PRESENT: County Manager Kenneth R. Thompson, Clerk to the Board Beverly A. Blythe, Director of Planning Marvin Collins and Planners Susan Smith and Laura Hill. A. BOARD COMMENTS Chair Willhoit- requested that the budget meeting calendar be discussed at the end of the meeting. B. AUDIENCE COMMENTS MATTERS ON THE PRINTED AGENDA Chair Willhoit indicated this meeting is a public hearing and those who wish to speak will be recognized. - MATTERS NOT ON THE PRINTED AGENDA None. C. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 1. PANTRY AREA PLAN (A copy of the Pantry Area Study Land Use Draft Plan is in the permanent agenda file in the Clerk's office) - PRESENTATION BY STAFF - Director of Planning Marvin Collins made some introductory remarks. He stated that the need for this study was exemplified by the proposed Scotswood development. Adoption of the Draft Land Use Plan would establish development standards for the transition areas and additional protection for environmentally sensitive areas. Planner Laura Hill pointed out on a map the area encompassed by the study. She stated that the first stage in the preparation of this area plan was the collection and analysis of data. Information was collected on the natural environment (topography, soils, vegetation, hydrology, and water resources) , infrastructure and public services, and sociological characteristics (census data, land use information) . She. further outlined the information as contained in the Pantry Area Study and the recommendations from the Hillsborough Township Advisory Council and the Hillsborough Planning Board. The Town Board will further review the information provided in this study and discuss it further at their June 9 meeting with a view toward making recommendations. COMMENTS OR OUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OR PLANNING BOARD Commissioner Carey asked if the retail area included other than those already in existence and Scotswood. Laura Hill stated that the retail area only includes those in existence and Scotswood. Planning Board Member David Shanklin inquired about the population increase between 1980 and 1985 and Laura Hill indicated the population increase for that time span averaged out at 6.3% a year and this was the Residential. The applicant is requesting the lot be rezoned to Genera Commercial-IV (GC-4) . Approval of the request would allow development of 0 8 1 the full range of commercial uses at this location. Rezoning of the property would allow for the expansion of the commercial uses in the area as a single commercial development or, alternatively, through the subdivision of the property into individual lots for commercial development dependent on the provision of public water and sewer services. An impact statement which addresses water and wastewater services, • roads/traffic, police, fire and rescue services, relationship between land use plan and zoning ordinance and permitted uses was presented and is included in the permanent agenda file. The Planning Staff recommends approval of the general rezoning. COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OR PLANNING BOARD In answer to a question from Chair Wilihoit about 'the annexation policy of the City of Durham, Smith responded that the City has no active annexation plans in the area. The City does not require annexation for the extension of public water and sewer service. An existing well and septic system serves the property. - Planning Board member Peter Kramer inquired about annexation proposals in the Durham 2005 Plan. Smith indicated that no firm. annexation proposals had been proposed by the City of Durham. Planning Board member Chris Best asked how this request differed from the North Carolina 751 rezoning case. Smith indicated that this site . utilizes an access road which funnels traffic in the area to one point on U. S. 70 rather than resulting in individual drives and points of conflict. Best inquired about the applicant's statements of justification. The applicant James Kirkman noted he had reviewed as much information as possible in making the statements, including the Hillsborough 701 Plan. The land adjacent to his property has been purchased, cleared, and submitted for commercial rezoning. There is an existing house on this property.. He stated that the adjoining property has been purchased by an equipment company which currently leases property down the road. In answer to Commissioner Cary's question about the sixty-foot accessway, Kirkman stated that it runs to the adjoining property and is in use. - Commissioner Marshall asked if . the Kirkman's occupied the residence and Kirkman affirmed that he does adding that it is an undesirable home site given the changes in the adjoining property. - PRESENTATION OR COMMENTS BY THE APPLICANT He reiterated the comments made . above. Be emphasized that the property is no longer suitable for residential purposes. He would like to get the property rezoned and disposed of. - 2. HEARTWOOD - PD-2-86 Planner Susan Smith presented for public comments - a proposed planned development rezoning and Class A Special Use Permit request submitted by Spence and Lyn Dickinson. The applicant is requesting approval of a planned development rezoning and issuance of a Class A Special Use Permit for 35.21 acres of land located west of Mill House Road (SR 1725) in Chapel Hill Township. The property is located within an area designated Rural Buffer in the Orange County Land use Plan. The present zoning classification is Rural Residential (R--1) . The applicants are U o' requesting. that the 35.21 acres be rezoned .PD-H--R' 1.2. Approval of the request would allow development of attached and detached single-family residential ' structures with an overall density of one unit per 40,0170 square feet. The impact statement addresses (1) water and wastewater services, (2) traffic/roads, (3) police, fire and rescue services, (4) facilities facilities, (5) • school facilities, (6) relationship between land use plan and zoning ordinance, and (7) permitted uses and is in the permanent agenda file. The Planning Staff recommends approval of the planned development rezoning and issuance of a Class A Special use Permit with the. attachment of 20 conditions. These are located on pages 39-42 of the permanent agenda file. Because of insufficient time, the Recreation and Parks Advisory Board has not made any comments.. They will discuss this item at their next meeting. COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OR PLANNING BOARD Chris Best asked if the proposed Heartwood Drive would be a paved road and Susan Smith . indicated it would be required to be a paved road. Oral. comments were received from DOT. They indicated it would rot be reasonable to upgrade Mill House Road and place the burden on 4ke thirty five lots located on that Road. They do not feel comfortable making improvements to roads beyond the property line. In answer to a question from Commissioner Marshall about the elevation of the homes, the applicant Spence Dickinson indicated that the houses will be custom designed and that information would not be known until the plans are submitted. . - Commissioner Moses asked about the use of the proposed stables and hiking trails that will be built on the adjacent property and if thor- who purchase land in that area will have access. Dickinson explained th the stables would not be available but the trails would be available six ce they are located on the thirty-five acres. In answer to a question from Betty Margison, Dickinson stated the utility lines will be under ground. The tot lot will be adjacent to the lake and will have access to the lake. Done of the property will front on Mill House Road. Future development to the north will depend on the soil analysis in the area. - - COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FROM CITIZENS, Lewis Dworsky asked about the square foot minumum for each house and Dickinson indicated they have talked about a 1200 foot maximum per floor_ He asked about the location of the hiking trails and was told they go mainly around the lake. They will work with Duke Forest to get permission for the trails to be extended into that area. Dickinson indicated he has no plans at the present time for the land south of this proposed development. . Susan Smith clarified that the units would be single family-unattached units because of the current R--1 which the plan is developed in accordance with. Don Cox expressed concern for the condition of Mill House Road. He stated that the road conditions are intolerable. Two cars cannot pass and any additional traffic will be a real hazard for local residents. Linda Barnard spoke about the bad traffic situation and the uniqueness and quality of the area and ask that consideration be given to the preservation of the property particularly in the higher elevations. John Hartley made comments on Mill House Road. He indicated that the majority of the traffic would be going from the proposed Heartwood Road to Eubanks Road to NC 86. Spence Dickinson gave historical data on his family and his background in land development. In answer to a question from Barry Jacobs, he indicated that the houses that will be built -adjacent to the Duke Forest. 083 property will be across a ravine and not actually -abutting the property. There was a consensus to continue the public hearing to June 17 tee receive the Recreation and Parks recommendation -and an update from the . Health Department on the soil studies. 4 . SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AMENDMENTS (Copies of the proposed amendments are in the permanent agenda file in the Clerk's office) . Planner Susan Smith presented for the receipt of public comment proposed text amendments to the Subdivision regulations. These amendments are in response to concerns identified by the Board of Commissioners, Planning Board and Planning Staff concerning cluster development provisions, recreation standards and landscaping and buffer provisions. The proposed ordinance amendments, if approved, would clarify and improve the administration of the Subdivision Regulations. The Planning Staff recommends approval of the amendments. a. Section IV Sub-section IV-B-5 Lot Layout (Cluster Developments) b. Section II Definitions (Cluster Development.). The staff presentation was made by Planner Susan Smith. Commissioner Marshall commented that in IV-B-5--e it states "An approved preliminary subdivision plan shall provide for a total environment better than . . ." and stated she felt the work better to be subjective and quanitative and ask that it be more specific. Also the verbage in IV--B-5-e--g indicating small and isolated needs to be subjective. She questioned IV-B-5-e-c which states "Cluster open space - shall include irreplaceable natural features such as, but not limited to, . . . . " and asked if this was a requirement of the developer or is it only included when applicable. Smith indicated it is only included when applicable. .IV-B-5-f--b states "A detailed description . . ." and asked that detailed be changed to precise. Commissioner Carey questioned IV--B-5--d-b and asked to what extent conform to the proposals under consideration for reservation of open space for recreational purposes. Smith noted that these area would be required to be dedicated. c. Section IV Sub-Section IV-B-7 - Recreation Standards Marvin Collins outlined the changes in this Section. thhat have been made from the first proposal. . He pointed out that the proposed Ordinance amendment would only apply to major subdivisions having five lots or more. Section IV-B-7B--1 makes clear the mandatory dedication provisions. The concept of the Ordinance is to secure recreational land first, and if that is not possible, then secure payment-in-lieu, and to require that either the dedication or the payment-in-lieu be absolutely manatory. the distinction of which method will be utilized comes from the Land Use Plan of the County whether park lands are shown on the plan or not. Section IV-B--7B-2 establishes the 1/35th acre per dwelling unit to be provided in the subdivision. The only exception would be if the developer wishes to dedicate flood plain land or land with slopes more than 150, then the amount would be 1/20th of an acre per dwelling.. Section IV-B-7B- 3 allows recreational land on the borders of peoperty, should that be the most efficient area to use for that and adjoining subdivisions. Section IV-B--7B--4 requires that any private recreational facilities that a developer might wish to establish above the amount required by the County have the same quality standards as required by the Ordinance. Regarding the method of dedication, Section IV--B--7B•-5 provides for a conveyance to a home owners association for a private recreation facility. Section IV-B_ 7B-6, payments-in-lieu of dedication, a formula based on tax assessment 084 AGENDA 7.TEM 46 : MATTERS PPLSENTED AT PUBLIC HEARING 5-27-86 a. PD-2-86 Heartwood at Blackwood Mountain DRA FTPresentation by Collins. This agenda item is to consider for approval the proposed planned development rezoning and Class A Special Use Permit request submitted by Spence and Lyn Dickinson known as Heartwood. This item was considered at public hearing on May 27, 1986, June 16, 1986, July 7 , 1986 and August 4, 1986. Spence and Lyn Dickinson are requesting approval of a planned development rezoning and issuance of a Class A Special Use Permit for 35.21 acres of land located os DRAFT PBM MINUTES 8-18-86 PAGE 3 west of Mill House Road (SR 1725) in Chapel Hill • Township. The property is located within an area designated Rural Buffer in the Orange County Land Use Plan. The present zoning classification is Rural Residential (R- 1) . The applicants are requesting that the property be rezoned PD-f--R-1. Planning• Staff recommended approval with conditions as attached- on pages of these minutes. Collins indicated the location of roads• and of the subdivision in relation to Duke Forest. Pilkey questioned the condition • regarding off-site septic tank/filter fields lines/repair. . Collins responded there were some instances where a septic . tank site was not available on a lot but a site available adjacent to that lot, this . could be permitted with the filing of an easement. Kizer inquired how many such lots are proposed in this property. Collins responded three but the easement would be in common property not another lot which had a septic tank site. MOTION: Shanklin moved positive findings on Articles 8 .6 and 8.8 (site plan) . Seconded by Kizer. VOTE: Unanimous. MOTION: Yuhasz move positive findings on Article . 4.2 (urban services) . Seconded by Pilkey. VOTE: Unanimous (Best out of the room) . • Article 8.2.4 (a. method & adequacy of sewer and water services; b. emergency services; c. vehicle access) . Jacobs noted that staff findings on 8 .2.4 a) • are negative but are addressed by conditions 8 & 9. Staff findings on 8.2. 4 b) & c) are positive. MOTION: . Shanklin moved approval of • staff findings. Seconded by Pilkey. VOTE: Unanimous (Kramer out of the room) . • MOTION: Shanklin moved positive findings on Article 7 .4 .1 and 7 . 4 .2 (location--streets, location-drainage facilities, location--emerency services) . Seconded by Yuhasz. VOTE: UnaniTou the . room) . (Kramer out of )y 0 Y; 1<1 z >r moved appLoval of staff findings on 7 . 4 , 3 ( ';t e suita.bil i --.y) and 7 . _ . 3 (Access points, pa r;:irof • 08€ DRAFT PBM MINUTES 8-18-86 PAGE 4 walkways - external & internal) with staff conditions 6 & 7 as applied to 7 .14. 3.3 and 7.14.3.5 . Seconded by Shanklin. VOTE: Unanimous (Kramer out of the room) . MOTION: Shankin moved positive findings on Article 20.3 .2 (Amendment requirements) with 20.3 .2 c) (changed conditions) not. applicable. Seconded by Kizer. - VOTE: Unanimous. MOTION: Shanklin moved to approve staff findings on Article 5 (minimum lot area-positive, width & setbacks-not applicable, bulding height-positive) and Article 6 (minimum land area & ratio-positive and maximum land area-not applicable) . Seconded by Pilkey. VOTE: Unanimous. Article 8.2.2 states that where a preponderance of evidence indicates compliance with the general standards, specific rules governing the specific use, and that the use complies with all required regula- tions and standards, the application must be approved unless it is found, in some specific manner, that: 1. The use will not promote the public health, safety and general welfare if located where proposed and developed and operated according to the plan as submitted; 2. The use will not maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property; 3. The use is not incompliance with the teneral plans for the physical development of the county as embodied in these regulations or in the Comprehensive Plan, or portion thereof, adopted by the Orange County Board of Commissioners. The burden of proving one or more of the above findings is on those opposing the application. The proof must also be in the form of competent material and substantial evidence. The Planning Staff reviewed the application. the site plan and all supporting documentation and found that no information was received which would establish grounds for making one or more of the above findings. MOTION: Shanklin moved approval of Staff recommendation. Seconded by Kramer. ��;'� : Unanimous. O8 DRAFT PBM MINUTES 8-18-86 PAGE 5 MOTION: Shanklin moved to recommend approval subject to the twenty (20) conditions recommended by Staff. Seconded by Pilkey. Discussion followed on Condition #7e: "Construct all walking and biking paths with a minimum width of 4-6 feet and on slopes no greater than 5%. Construct all riding/hiking trails . with a minimum width of 6-8 feet with a minimum of 2 additional feet on either side and 10 feet over-head clearance. " Shanklin suggested that "4-6" should be changed to read "4" and "6-8" should be changed to read "6" Shanklin suggested that Condition #7c (3) read as follows: "in conjunction with sidewalk cut-aways and/or ramps in compliance with North Carolina State Building Code. " Pilkey inquired about the buffer between Duke Forest. Collins responded there are steep slopes between Heartwood and 150' of the Duke Forest property line. Discussion followed involving maintaining vegetation in this area. Collins responded that Condition #12 would address this problem until the lots were sold. It was suggested to add the following sentence to Condition #l2 : Existing vegetation shall not be removed from the area located within 50 ' of the Duke Forest property line. The three changes were accepted As a friendly amendment. VOTE: 6 in favor, 2 opposed (Kiser, Walters) . MOTION: Shanklin moved approval of the overall project. Seconded by Kramer. VOTE: Unanimous. O R A N G E C O U N T Y BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 088 ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date September 22_19.86 Actin A ends Item �__ SUBJECT: Lake Hogan Lane - Preliminary Plan DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes _X_ No Attachment( s) Information Contact: Jane Garrett Application Vicinity Map Preliminary Plan Agency Comments Telephone Numbers W� Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham -- 688 -7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 PURPOSE: To consider the Lake Hogan Lane Subdivision, property. of Lucy Carol Davis, for approval . To receive the Planning Board ' s recommendation . NEED: The property in question is located on SR 1728 (Lake Hogan Farm Road) in Chapel Hill Township . The property is referenced as Lots 23 and 23A of Tax Map 109 . It is bordered by agricultural and residential development . The tract is designated as Twenty Year Transition on the Land Use Plan . This property is within the Joint Planning Area which requires courtesy review from the Carrboro Planning Department . There are six (6) lots proposed out of 13.9 acres . The lot sizes are 1 . 4 acres, 2.9 acres, 3. 1 acres and 1 .5 acres (3 lots) excluding the rights-of-way. The property is zoned R-1 (Rural -Residential ) . An Orange County Class "B" private road (Lake Hogan Lane) is proposed to provide access to the lots in the subdivision . Fire protection for the property is provided by the . South Orange Fire District . Law enforcement is provided by the Orange County Sheriff ' s Department . If will be patrolled on a 24-hour basis . IMPACT: Projected traffic generation from this subdivision is approximately 66 (9 .5 x 7 lots) trips per day . According to the Department of Transportation , the 1985 (most current) traffic count for SR 1777 , determined from the eastern 7 08 - intersection with. SR 1834, is 2900 average daily trips . There was no traffic count conducted for SR 1728 . RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Board recommended approval of the Preliminary Plan on August 18, 1986 contingent upon the following condi- tion : - Recordation of a legal document stating the unsuitability of Lot 6 for development . This document must be recorded simul - taneous with the Final Plat . w J PLEASE TYPE GR PRINT ( INK ONLY) 09C. 11185 APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL ORANGE COUNTY DATE: 4-25-86 SUBDIVISION NAME: • T,gkp Nea3n T,arie LOCATION: /'loo, Z'h�`e�r 1LA. Cake i-�a o� fzrL, /��X / � FJ e , c„4/ (4j / OWNER/DEVELOPER:. • Lucy Carol Davis ADDRESS: 143 W. Franklin, Suite 314 TELEPHONE NO. : 919/93J-•/'/p rhnrpl Hiii NC 77514 AGENT/CONTACT:, Phillip Zook TELEPHONE NO . : 919/933-7775 141 W. Franklin. Suite 314 - Chapel Hill NC 27514 A. SUMMARY INFORMATION: Orange County Tax Map 109 Block Lot(s] 23-23A Township Chapel Hill Zoning Oistrictts) : R-1 Total Number of Acres : 13.9 Phases : 1 . Total Number of Lots: 7 Average Lot Size: L.7 ac Minium': Lot Size 1.6 ac Number/Type of Structures : (existing) None p (pr pesed) 7 single family • Lineal Feet in Streets: 1350' , Acres in - Open S ace NA Water Supply: Public.[specify) Community X Inclividuat Wastewater Disposal: Public(specify) Community x Individual Schoo L •District: Chapel Hill Fire Di str ct.: South Orange General Land Uses in Area: Single family residential jai ,L,�,1, CriticaL Areas: - stream/droina.geweys flood pronil, areas . watershed(specify) histaric site: other(expLain) NA • B. ALL plats must be submitted on sheet no smaller than one inch equals two- hundred feet (1 m=200 ' ) and. no Larger than one inch equals fifty feat (19=50' ) and must contain the foLLowing information : subdlrision namr �J ' c. .,� 6u1 Ldtat sntorck Lines E `.''� isms at ownsr(al by notation or typical tat :heck Items name. of aureeyer, engineer or .� ";, Layout ig Land planner . .- stinting :ompleted) ti ,• (title] Preliminary Plan — . 9 and proposed ease— h.,; r �::: manta (drainage, uti Litiaa, • �' L— � stele, north- arrow (North at •'•';;: % roads, ate.) :•• tap of map] ii'` 'y..} ; ,.,, adjoining proposed and �. .ry f dots IincLuding revialon dates] adjoining rights-of--way township, tax map-block-lot including dimension, and + :; referentss street nseles and title road • �� }:• boundary deacribsd with numbers bearings and distancing �� . existing and proposed • total acreage of the tract utilities, including • fftiµa; and acreage of Lots, including :;rz-: type, sizes, .4$ti end excluding area within i;�:i hydrants, valves and V ::,;� rights--of—may -"'t manholes control corner existing end proposed culvert indpropasad Lot Lines with .. Including sizes end grades dimensions _ 1/ Cypieal ntrest sactto ns i Lot numbers g r and lntersaction detmi La' phasing lines ; ;_s including design and width --"--..L.— ••r topography st ten foot (10] '•;�•: of travetway and shoulders . ;', intervals r• ,. horizontal aLlgnsene and water bodies, me, flood— y general curve data (public �"�`�'z# way end ftoodpLaine roedsl r stream buffer* and notation permanent features such as W indicating restricted kr .. buildings, cam atarteg, datelopeant potential historic landmarks, township. corporate and extra— ..,w. Li;,:.: adjoining Lot Layout territorial planning names of adjoining propert jurisdiction lines which owners and subdivisions y • cross the property Looation end size of parcels dedicated for public use or reserved :- }"; in common location and size of lots of restricted development potential. end v- +r': natation an plat regarding arse �: y atormweter aenagement plan Indicating provision far control. of the first 1/2 inch of runoff from- iepervioua surfaces teeny n_e_rAr rnr, orrrirr rftc f'Ml vl C . OTHER SUBMITTAL R EaUI R EI4 ENTS: 1 . Twenty—six (26) copies of the preliminary plat 2. Two fu LL size copies of an Orange County Tax map (one c. • y with tax parcels inv:lved clearly marked) . 3. Where municipa or OWASA sewer is not avai lab Le , a Lett - from the Orange County Health De. = rtmant certifying the proposed we= ewatar system for each Lot. I , the applicant , hereby car fy that the foregoing = pplication is comp Leta and accurate . I understand that a $210.00 fee (subdivisions of 15 lots or less) or a $370 .00 fee (subdivisions o 16 Lots or ore) is due at the time of application . A $5.00 per Lot ea is due =t the time the final plat is presented for recordation . • APPLI TNT S I • TURE OWNE- -E 2 gr ! ri r SATE DATE FEES: Amount 210.00 Date Paid ¢' 2-9.676' Receipt 11 5- -1 30 .0D i_20-86 OTHER SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS : 1 . Twenty—six [ 26 ) copies of the preliminary plat 2. Two full size copies of an Orange County Tax map (one copy with tax parcels involved clearly marked) . 3. Where municipal or OWASA sewer is not available , a letter from the Orange County Health Department certifying the proposed wastewater system for each lot . 1 , the applicant , hereby certify that the foregoing application is complete and accurate . I understand that . a $210.00 fee ( subdivisions of 15 lots or leas) or a $370 .00 fee (subdivisions of 16 tots or more) is due at the time of application . A $5.00 per Lot fee is due at the time the .final plat is presented for recordation . WRLI i`NT 'S gICr.ATUAE OWNER 'S S SI/,iNATU''E 21L.Z.f 'LATE / DATE / G • FEES: Amount 210 00 Date Paid ` Z-C- 6 Receipt /1 g 5 gD •Do 4-26 -% 1I (o7 ,.... . IS ',', 14( E HOCTA ki ___ p LANE- .- N , ..... _ < AFPUCANT: Lucy eARoL. DAvt6 5 zotimic: k-I RuPAL. 124610ENTIAL. • 1..LLP.60516•AlAnoN: 7INEAreg yEAe TP.ANsinew . 092 •/-7,-■ -•-,y 7.•'-T.. .5 ,I,C,'-:. L. ..___,___-. • ,...Emp-r 0544 ------i • _--- NN ___,------------ ie. \ 4 ,,, .....(cs ( n, • -..... • , 1 _• ,..- \\ . ?„0 4 ____ ,, , ,- , , 3 '0002 . 3825 7—'1 ' \N„„..... • ) __ t -'AC.,..---; ,■, \ (S___4). . __ -- - ' \ -4832 I .56 AC .— — --- ..:•,, \\ - 4a, A.C. - --• s .., _- 24 8614 1 \-,,__.__ (7' . -14 -7 i: : ,...._ -- -- ',e..I ------ : 315 ---' at, <. ----- 179 Ac • , ,,--- .1 Cs \' 1--'.,:, ; 3 AC. t • 10 ------z------,-_____=7:,_:„, ..__ cc , ;_,.., - ii_ ----__ ,... I 1 7 -war v-Akvii . ----1 Irif 4' ,: , i A pA.A I 1 "----• 1: 14 di+ AL vie .:.,‘Ah.' A _-5- ----- 9991 gle 4,,,,,. ..,7, 2,----,-,a, 4--.•.._..• 111rAbir 4A , __,..„4632 i 4■7411•_ * 8693 . , 7 AC, •-; --., 7 , .k' '1 - .2.1^r. " ; • 7 Ac_ ' ___-- - _ _ V / / . ••----- -.---1.6.612 , __------------- - -- 2 •-___... 6412 ...488 ' -24 . _. ..__. --- , Nk , , , ______ __ F.- 4. .;.-' .i I__ __ 14DME5TEN) ph A, ...., , I ,....,....... - ..-■- ■, '_ .71.-_.._ "V, 0 R A■.:r,--. 1 ...... ...• ..:,..... ".' .-. -..-.-.- -,..-._, ..._ •-.-.■-_ ...12. 5n... 1777 . _...^ "7.- --- .'8 a ' . ', .e.-.. • ,'‘,.....-"..'-'.---", - ___ --.1:- _LI-- /-lic)-, 777 A c. ,--'-' "■,''' ''-■.-.-- 106_95 •.--. -....":-. . • tr419P6 t4 _- • --..z .., ■ —--:...z,„... ,:_-- _ r:,--,AD 2 . --------,-17_ — -----=_--2,---__—___,--- ------- --- -— _ !6 gc_ ---_____ • 71 L534 ' 0343 -__..-. StALe: 1"....400o-v" — _- - ..... _ . -- - AC. 2226 ''-■2943 •{9 ___,...-----------1 ..9 4c 091"! Lake Hogan Lane 11/85 ORANGE�COUNTY CERTIFI CATION AND APPROVALS -- PRELI"y:`-1AFiY PLAT. STAFF ASSIGNMENT : Jane Atwater Garrett SKETCH PLAN : Received 3-14-86 __.v Reviewed 3-19_86 PRELIMINARY PLAT : Received . 4-25-86 Reviewed 5-30-86 REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT : Received 8-8-86 Reviewed 8-14-86 NCOOT : DATE__ 6-12-86_ CERTIFICATION _ Joe B. Hynes, Hwy. Main. E ineer ^m SCHOOL BOARD (Orange/Chapel Hi tl-Carrboro ) : DATE 6-2-86 Certification WA__ UTLITIES (O1gASA/Hi L lsbo rough/Mebane/Orange A lamance/Durham) : DATE - Certification OTHER : Recreation Advisory Council 6 2 8 __ (Date) Carrboro Fire Department ( Date) Chapel Hill (Date) Carrboro 6-11-86 ( Date) Hillsborough (Date ) Durham (Date) Other Soil & Erosion 6 3--86 ; 7-7=86w (Date) Health Department 4-24 85 -(Date) PLANNING BOARD : Date _fiz_15_86 _ Approval Tabled X Approval with Conditions Denial e Date 8-18-86 Approval with Conditions X BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS : Date Approval Approval with Conditions Denial • - 7.4. 094 P,C).Box 337 47, 301 West Main Street arrboro }t Carrboro,North Carolina 27510 t d y . . N.C. a ;n r (919)942-8541 June 11, 1986 Ms. Jane L. Atwater, Planner Orange County Planning Department 106 Margaret Lane Hillsborough, NC 27278 RE: Courtesy Review Lake Hogan Lane - Preliminary Plan Dear Jane: - The Town of Carrboro has reviewed the preliminary plat of the Lake Hogan Lane Sub- division and the specific comments and recommendations are as follows: 1. That if approved septic sites are not found on Lots 6 and 7, their preliminary and final plats should clearly indicate that building per- mits shall not be issued until adequate sewage disposal is assured. 2. That the 50 foot right-of-way be extended to the eastern-most property line of Lot 7; and a temporary T--turn around constructed for use until such time that the road is extended. 3. That Lake Hogan Lane be improved to 18 feet width. 4. That you check with OWASA on the existing water lines in that area; con- tingent upon the location of OWASA lines, the Town suggests that a fire hydrant be installed at the north west corner of the intersection of Lake Hogan Farm Road and Lake Hogan Lane. If you have any questions or desire additional clarification of any information presented in this letter, please give me a call. Sincerely, silf-47A0 G. Gregory Shepard Zoning Administrator GGS/pap /"eGer.r-eL ( -1 -o6 &) Q9 il Grange Count'," :: nret . `_ =� ` �_ HILLSBOROUGH. R C. 27278 .L_l.te.Hein it. • Mary Anne Black. Director MEMORANDUM TO: Jane Atwater, Planner . • FROM: Mary Anne Black " DATE: June 10, 1986 . • RE: Courtesy Review -- Charter Meadows, Section III Dunn Property Lake Hogan Lane Blueberry Hill . Upon review of the preliminary plans for the proposed Charter Meadows (Section III), Dunn property, and Lake Hogan Lane subdivision, I find no element(s) warranting comment from a recreation and park perspective. ' In reference to the proposed Blueberry Hill subdivision, the 6.3 • acre area designated "park (private)" is of interest from a staff. perspective in that I would be interested in knowing what type of . development is planned. It would be beneficial to the future residents to have this development encompass "passive" areas such as open/green spaces (cleared), walking paths, and a picnic area, possibly. Thank you for the opportunity to make these staff comments. I will - present my recommendations to the Orange County Recreation and Parks Advisory Council at their next meeting (July 1, 1986) and will forward to you any changes/additional comments they may have. MAB/pb1 . CC: Lorraine Parker, Chair, Recreation & Parks Advisory Council Robert A. Jones, Jr., Northern District Supervisor Brian E. Cox, Southern District Supervisor hteutr j 6-12-0(0 &. Hillsborough, 732-9361 • Durham, 688-7333 a Chap;;i l-ki. 958-45u1 • Me-ans_ 2227-1!)32 . Area Code 919 . 7 • "17 f I C- It `��• ORANGE C� t� 6 A O 096. • Z 0 Dwight Kelly, Divisi N.C. Department of 'T P.O. Box 9278 Greensboro, NC 27408 RE: Lake Hogan Lane Dear Mr. Kelly: Enclosed is the Preliminary Plan of the abovereferenced subdivision for your review. The property is referenced as Tax Map 109 Lots 23 and 23A in Chapel Hill Township and located on the east side of SR 1728 (Lake Hogan Farm Road) approximately450 feet north of SR 1777. The applicant is proposing seven (7) lots to be used for single family units. An Orange County Class "B" private road will be constructed from SR 1728 to provide access for all lots in the subdivision. Please provide your comments by June 9, 1986. It will be greatly appreciated. Yours truly, PUU-t• kriAriAJ Jane L. Atwater Jane Planner - We recommend the following : - 1 . ?r":'perty lines follow a 10 ' x 70 ' sight triangle JLA/ja At intersection . 2 . Drive permit required . Enclosure 3 . The developer ' s road frontage along Lake Hogan Farm Road to be built to one half of a 40 ' typical, section — 20 ' from centerline tc di.tch with 9 ' wi_dthof:Stone 4" deep . Yours truly , • Joe B . Haynes , Hwy.Maint _Eng _ 09 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT HILLSBOROUGH NORTH CAROLINA 27278 ryety 9! b- r �I dIl' MEMORANDUM TO: Jane Atwater, Planner FROM: Warren Faircloth, Erosion Control Office r F SUBJECT: Clarification of Stormwater Management Plan for Lake Hogan Lane Subdivision DATE : July 1 , 1986 I have reviewed the letter of June 19, 1986 from Gail Freeman Associates clarifying the stormwater management plan for this subdivision . This letter answers my concerns about this plan and together with the original plan meets the requirements of the subdivision regulations . atehfrr: L 4-146 .ieizo 088 k. Lake Hogan Lane - Preliminary Plan Presentation by Garrett. DRAFT This Hogan agenda item is to consider the Lake Ho g g Subdivision, property of Lucy Carol Davis, for approval. This item was tabled on June 16, 1986 due to the number of conditions placed on the subdivision, specifically the submission of an approved Stoliriwater Management Plan. The property in question is located on SR 1728 (Lake Hgan Farm Road) in Chapel Hill Township. The property is referenced as Lots 23 and 23A of Tax Map 109. It is bordered by agricultural and residential development. The tract is designated as Twenty Year Transition in the Land Use Plan, This property is within the Joint Planning Area which requires courtesy review from the Carrboro Planning Depart- ment. There are six (6) lots proposed out of 13 .9 acres. • O9b• DRAFT PBM MINUTES 8-18-86 PAGE 16 The lot sizes •are 1. 4 acres. 2.9 acres. 3.1 acres and 1.5 acres (3 lots) excluding the rights--of-way. The property is zoned R-1 (Rural-Residential) . An Orange County Class "B" private road (Lake Hogan Lane) is proposed• to provide access to the lots in the subdivision. Fire protection. for the property is provided by the South Orange Fire District. Law enforcement is provided by • the Orange County Sheriff' s Department and will be patrolled on a 24-hour basis. Projected traffic generation from this• subdivision is approximately 66 (9 .5 x 7 lots) trips per day. According to the Department of Transportation. the 1985 (most current) traffic count for SR 1777. determined from the eastern intersection with SR 1834 . is 2900 average daily trips. There was no traffic count conducted for SR 1728. On June 16 , 1986 the Planning Staff recommended approval of the Preliminary Plan contingent upon the following conditions: 1) Submission of a Stormwater Management Plan. which either presents a proposal to control the stormwater runoff or explain why stormwater management measures are unnecessary for this subdivision to meet the standard per Erosion Control Officer' s comment; • 2) Change the State Road number for Lake Hogan Farm Road from Sr 1777 to 1728; SR 1777 is • the State Road number for Homestead Road; 3) Approval of Lots 6 and 7 for on-site wasterater systems or combination of the lots to provide approved sites for each lot proposed or notation on the plat indicating the unsuitability of the lots for development and recordation of legal document stating the same; 4) The 50 foot right-of-way be extended to the eastern- - most property line of Lot 7 ; and a temporary T--turn around constructed for use until such time that the road is extended; 5) Property lines follow a 10' x 70 ' sight triangle at the intersection of Lake Hogan Land and SR 1728; 6) The road frontage for Lake Hogan Lane along SR 1728 be built to one half of a 40 ' typical section -- 20 ' from the centerline to the ditch with 9 ' wideth of stone 4" deep. The applicant has con`:)ied with the above mentioned conditions, therefore, tila P].n1. ln.!3 Sta.H reconr1eI:,d i X00 DRAFT PDM MINUTES 8-18--86 PAGE 17 approval of the Preliminary Plan contingent upon the condition: Recordation of a legal document stating the unsuita- bility of Lot 6 for development. This document must be recorded simultaneous with the the Final Plat. Garrett noted that the applicant is appealing the condition #3 to the State. MOTION: Sbanklin moved approval with staff conditions. Seconded by Yuhasz. VOTE: Unanimous. O R A N G E C O U N T Y 101 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date SeptemteL 19a6 Action A ends Item F SUBJECT: MEL-OAK PHASE II (ADDITION OF LOT 23) - PRELIMINARY DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes , K No Attachment( s) Information Contact: APPLICATION MARVIN COLLINS VICINITY MAP PRELIMINARY PLAT PRELIMINARY PLAT CERTIFICATION Telephone Numbers Hillsborough -- 732-8181 Durham -- 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 . Chapel Hill - 968-4501 PURPOSE: To consider a revised Preliminary Plat for Mel -Oaks Phase II Subdivision for approval . The Planning Board recommended approval of the Preliminary Plan on May 19, 1986 and the Board of Commissioners approved the Preliminary Plan June 17 , 1986 . The Planning Board approved the Final Plat of Section II on August 5, 1986 . NEED: The property in question is known as lots 30A and 30C of Tax Map 117 . The property is owned by Calvin Mellott. The purpose of the request is to permit the addition of Lot 23 between Lot 7 (Phase I ) and Lot 22 (Phase II ) on Mel Oaks Drive. The property is designated Rural Buffer and Protected Water Supply Watershed - University Lake . The property is zoned Residential -1 (R 1 ) and Protected Watershed it (PW--II ) . These districts permit the development of single family residential housing on minimum lot sizes of 40,000 square feet. The property is located within the Chapel Hill/Carrboro School District and the Carrboro fire district. IMPACT: Approval of the request would allow the development of one additional lot within the subdivision . The area of the proposed Lot 23 is 42,000 square feet . An additional 10 trips per day would be generated, bringing -Dotal traffic from Phase II to 87 trips per day. The Health Department has given approval to the proposed Lot 23 . The proposed lot arrangement is better and results in more usable lot areas for Lots 7, 22 and 23 . RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Board recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat . PLEASE TYPE .OR PRINT (INK ONLY) . APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL OFIANGE C LINTY /j OATE: tS ;iiBDIVYSIUN NAME: , /Ij I �/ . -S '._O.CATI ON: J 4.4#a S F -se '' a o /¢,�J . . . • ,�►NER/DEVELQPEii:. _<- c; /�'V' �! <;i-o . ADDRESS:: . TELEPHONE Na.,: SENT/CONTACT:. :rte: l S I Z----/.01 ) : TELEPHONE. NO. : , 4/2.--././L. .� ' z75�`/ . SUMMARY INFO/ MATZOH: Grange County Tax. Map 11VSLock '----------Lotts) -2- Township • Zoning Oistrictts] Total Number or Acres : - iii- Phases: Total Number of Lots: T Average Lot Size:: 1-ek fnimum• Lot Size 4/ ,e Numb er/`rype•..;uf' Structu rea: taxi sting) ....... a — (proposed) �_•____ Lineal Feet `1n. Streets :-• d+'. Acres in Open Space °�=� -�" Water Supply:. tiF L t._ Pub Lictspecify1 Community ' • dfvidua - Wastewater Di spoa L: -5 J << '- Pula Li o t apeci fy) _. Cammun i ty • ndi Sri dui: Schizo L Di strict: _ C. 4=1, . Fi rs. Diatri ct: part--'r.- . --°vim General Land Uses in at i2. s 11? EfAt r-i A- .— �-LL2 Critical Areas: stream/drainageways flood prone areas .7/ S watersheeitsp.ecify) historic sites- cthertexplain) . • : . ALL plate must be submitted on sheet no. smaller than one inch aqua LS two– hundred feet (117=200' 3 and. no Larger than one inch squats fifty feet t1 "=50 ' ) and must. contain. the folLowing information : . ,,.�` ° 6; �; but Wing wrzbeak lines snbdl�rleion Hers • .�" Haar of awaar(s) `}}tie by notation or typical loo k i tems „= _:::::<S name, at yes, engineer or F: Layout IeCed lend planner _ �, < existing and proposed ens.— - p ) A �' •• (tittel Prsliminer Plan ►rv�.b Y ��. aunts (drainage, ut1 Lineup L— #:44 spate, north arrow (North it { #'•:r reeds,. sec.) FORtop of wept �j,,, existing., proposed and - • date (including revision detss)� :::; adjoining rights—of—may township, taz sap—block-aloe 5:::::'r including dimeneiane and '' • reterssese .- Y} street news and state road • l� • boundary desarlbed with {'••- number"y{:' besrings and die-tondos `'f a;satin {� fiS;� t,w g and proposed emote total acreage of the erect r ;:;rZ': utilities, including : :a- :$ end 'acreage of tots, including ti E YP v sizes. ..451 and excluding area within 4r."{0 hydrant', valves and .:: sy`y~`: rights—of—say .mg g manholes aF central earner existing end proposed culvert '- proposed tat lines. with �.r... including sizes end grades If r'"'-. dimensions �:='# c lot numbers :..- typical street eroaa4weetlonm �' end intersection details "r s:S°•`^ pluming tines *n including daaign and width topogrs h et ten foot (10I �. iwwt P f .-lag •T CreveLwry end shoulders fay.# intervals horizontal alignment and °.- meter bodies, streams, flood— :' -tt!n 1 general aorta data (public: :iim way end floodptains • Z: stream buffers end notation •-:�� 5R* permanent features such as *EM3 indicating restricted pr y': buiidlna., ice (-�..::: development potential ,...— historic Landmarks, *_ '< township. carparets and extra— :M: adjoining lot layout - MO territorial planning f adjoining. property ' jurisdiction lines which ownersend stbdivistonr 4.---lkY Crass the property Location end sisw or parcels dedicated for public' use or reserved - - WP in • location and size of fats of reatriassd development potential and .—.-■-M3 notation an atet regarding same,- 1 10t4 QTAEn SUHP4UTTALn REQUIREMENTS: • • t4 Twenty—six .[253 copies of the preliminary plat 2. Two full size copies of an Orange County Tax nap (one copy with tax parcels involved clearly marked) . 3. Where municipal or OWASA sewer is not available, a. letter from the Orange County Health Department certifying -the proposed waetpwater system-. for skach lot. . . 8 that applicant, hereby certify that the foregoing app Li cats c� is complete and :cureta. I undir�etsnd that a. $21D.O0 'fee (subdivisions of '1,5 Lots or Lase) ee $3711.00 fee (subdivisions of 15 Lots or morel is due at the time of ,plication . A $5.O0 per Lot '- fee ,ia due at- the time the final. plat le -esanted for recordation • et, �..y .�!-1 �.#�.:�.��/I ' r.. f Lam_ . RL 1C.ANT ' --/- GNATUAE OW ; - N•- _ DATE • - a 4 • • FEES: Amount Date Paid - Receipt • • 1�_ FCti . • s • ` SEE . MAP'37-31E11 O 4 • r � —'3096..•- — 1 . -k _ 111 ., RING}14M TWSP --......s . N - - P/O 126-53 AC. \ • _�9qI , 26.340 AC 2 �& t- -.—� ss£ Map . • �— tan >t a !„ • (CLYDE ice a - . .„ • . MEL OAKS—IC • 26 -" ; 75.08AC r Property of - f 7 3i `� LUP Designation: Rural Buffer& r • = 1 , F - MAP' -�--- Protected Watershed :� r t I 011.AMPlAti 317E MAP Zoning.District: R-1 and PW-]I "{ �E`'2' 57. 33 4 : f /O 32.1 AG , ANGHAM TT Cy]n - •_ tr4oa' ---._ — ...,... - Fit AA.• ( 14 AC. �/ LANE. a • -- 1a85 AC 1 `� - . sue± '+ 3 �� Ori9 . I �' //. PI: 2 fl,,2. AC. ,•• G / 2499 :•.. 98- I. 1', •9430 i d@A�9"354 - .may ! ..„ ,„...7 na • i _ 9IA1 ti 3t 10 AC. 4.313 10 AC • try: E. 23� r AC. 4 342 .14:: 4��cl`:] • 5083 .76 AC 2 53'X 12 2• AC CAL ., r 0 / • ,.27 41 AC. • . 5.05.4C f f 9793 l 6669 P/O 29- a 7597 - a.3 AC 2.15P.C- _ ' '''''114111111111111111111144111111111 \ - ' � 1._. 2.12 ti 215 • !11 p .!\\ ,' AC flfl '.r ���;Q,,,,--4 i . •,::, ��, ,5271;C ,1 1 ' 19 •x-• p ! ( it 1. 1 • — t "a.sg5a! a E."te ?� OG a. _Y... e9-A� �: 2A � r;. 7. ‘s., .- a 0..' (I 7311 f - II a~ 20 15 AC. 6 AC '• 8.11 AC * `i. '' a \ adS 3332 \\v". s . ■ \ -' II \ � 2987 , i+ —.. \1 \ ( 31 2.37 Ac �.� - Igs oar _■ " �if a c osea 2z 1 _ - !` ...i.... I - - .� • - ORANGE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT . . I r.‘. • -F,ERENLfI KR :--I-1 I L ANAL YS I S' Da),. 08. 86 FIN9757_74_2749 MAP REFERENCE ,7.c.... • QUESTEE:_1....,:i.-- _ • :•.:•-esIN . owNErc.._ r_ .-; ,,,... , L 11.K.,...; ,::,..'; • . . . ,-,ppL .„-. . ,,_ NC 27514 Re''1'ti',-.:',;j ', ),1:: :: L 0 E C E I Il 8-t1-B‘ .7..,i2-11.7 . ( -,:-.PEL 7:-.ILL ..i: LEpHoNE. _ ECIFICADQn.-,_:. ...._i......n... To Fir,i Lt, .7 ...L.i R. s 7 r., • L&71---11:5; • . - .... ....••■1••■•■■••■■••••••••••• • ■■■■ • -)CATION]DIRECTIONS: •NI 10 /9 6 775 :E RECEIPT: 0262.7.ja SIGNATURE OF OWNER OFtA9HORIZO Ag.NT:__:- .444. / 1/r"41:-...-• <:.(IN.L—ej I , . \ 1/141/1-e■-1 e L; '" .--.c_ ONFIRMED BY PLANNER PLANNER / 1 DATE - CLERK .. - ,Ca.PE P.... .- TEXTURE 5 75rRucTu„-. 6,---73---- .. . DEPTH (.....i--3-7- ______ _ HOR :if': S7 IN. D RA IN t --( EX. TY--.Ali,1 r.s- ..._ ......_ PERNEAB F-5 ..,E FALL ....-L__ . . • . . :7:jt13-1.-Re.-.:1 Azdt,e7A/1!_emd b-40--v--f-/ .... / : / / :-,-,- .5,1, /- ,0 .0,c-oe-,...... -; e=,..*.y& ...fr .1,-.4,/ p /.4._..(4),--4,4 iy 4,--= .-1, • , ,.___ ..._, ----------- Pete t Ock t_. i-5 r ,Li'....... - ---- --- __ ---- -; --.----. ------ • • I I . ,....:-...........‘,„? -.--"-........."..."'"........\\ (:::■:.......i..........,...,...., ' ,^Pf-/" i: - i • a a•---........-,—............==..- n-'":"..‘ i - - +■ N • / ' 1 I r , . . • ,. . ..„, 1 . . . . : . - ...., . • • . • . . . . - . - .. , • -.. .- ., -...• . %...,i (;,.. ..1 " SAN I TI-IR I AN I ' . 1oh • i. Mel-Oaks Phase II. (Addition of Lot 23) - Preliminary Presentation by Collins. R.A.FnIl This agenda item is to consider a revised Preliminary Plat for Mel-Oaks Phase II Subdivision for approval. The Planning Board recommended approval of the Preliminary Plan on May 19. 1986 and the Board of Commissioners approved the Preliminary Plan June 17, 1986. The Planning Board approved the Final Plat of 1.0 DRAFT PBM MINUTES 8-18-86 PAGE 14 Section II on August 5, 1986. The property in question is known as lots 30A and 30C of Tax Map 117. The property is owned by Calvin Mellott. The purpose of the request is to permit the addition of lot 23 between Lot 7 (Phase I and Lot 22 (Phase II) on Mel Oaks Drive. The property is designated Rural Buffer and Protected Water Supply Watershed -- University Lake. The property is zoned Residential-1 (R-1) and Protected Watershed II (PW-II) . These districts permit the development of single family residential housing on. minimum lots sizes of 40,000 square feet. The property is located within the Chapel Hill/ Carrboro School District and the Carrboro Fire District. Approval of the request would allow the development of one additional lot within the subdivision. The area of the proposed lot 23 is 42 ,000 square feet. An additional 10 trips per day would be generated, bringing total traffic from Phase II to 87 trips per day. The Health Department has given approval to the proposed lot 23. The proposed lot arrangement is better and results in more usable lot areas for Lots. 7 , 22 and 23. Planning Staff recommended approval of the Prelimi- nary Plat. 21OTION: Shanklin moved approval. Seconded by Yuhasz. Best inquired how the lot was missed previously when planning the subdivision. Collins responded that Mellott did not own this lot previously. VOTE: Unanimous. If O R A N G E C O U N T Y. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT iO Meeting Date September 2,_1986 Act ion ends Item -. SUBJECT: DELVIN WOODS - PRELIMINARY DEPARTMENT:PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes X _ No Attachment( s) Information Contact: MARVIN COLLINS Checklist Vicinity Map Preliminary Plan Agency Letters Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 967-9251 PURPOSE : To consider approval of the Preliminary Plan for Delvin Woods Subdivision . To receive the Planning Board ' s recommendation . NEED : The property in question is located in Eno Township on the east side of Bivins Road ( SR 1573) . It is referenced as part of lot 20A of Tax Map 11 . All lots would have access to the proposed Delvin Lane ( public) . The tract is bordered by residential ( including a 27-unit mobile home park) and undeveloped wooded land . There are 20 lots proposed out of 23 .8 acres with an average lot size of 1 .07 acres excluding the street right-of-way . The zoning of the property is Agricultural -Residential (AR) as is the Land Use Plan designation . The AR zoning district classi - fication requires a minimum lot size of 40,000 square feet or 0 .92 acres . IMPACT: The Health Department has granted approval to all lots in the subdivision . Police protection would be provided by the Orange County Sheriff ' s Department, while fire protection would be provided by the Eno Rural Fire District . The 1984 traffic count on Bivins Road ( SR 1573) was 200 trips per day . An additional 190 trips per day would be generated by the subdivision . Delvin Lane is to be constructed to NCDOT standards for a local residential street ( 18. foot wide pave- 10 ment) and dedicated for public use. There are no creeks or streams flowing through the property. Soils are Georgeville with moderate limitations for septic tanks and slight limitations for dwellings . RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Board recommended approval of the Preliminary Plan on August 18, 1986 contingent upon the following condi- tion: - dedication of a 50 ' public right-of-way along the northern boundary line of lot #11 which will extend from Delvin Lane to the eastern property line. WJ PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT ( INK ONLY) - 11 O 11/85 • APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL ORANGE COUNTY • . DATE: 6 12.(o F GUODIVISION NAME: --- aLV N V./C-4 5 LOCATION : R I V O45 1.DA D Jv-NCJ "T\? Imo. OWNER/DEVELOPER;. -r!--Ea\J-).-E r-N.T g-T i.Si-S, )NG- ADDRESS: �, TELEPHONE NO , : --- AGENT/CONTACT: ANT krfrr‘ c){qe s :. ,.1�.. ^ TELEPHONE NO . : A . SUMMARY INFORMATION : _ Orzinget County Tax Map tt Block -- , Lot (s) ZD Township Zoning District (s) : TataL Number of Acres : -24- Phases : i ---— Total Number of Lots : ,2o Average Lot Size : Minimum Lot Size 0-`EP,4c:r Number/Type- of Structures : (existing] rlcx.]? (prnpoeed] ir _ ,,al, y .Linea L Feat in Streets : ....05t.,-1- Acr©s in Open Space _ %later Supply : Pub Lic ( spool fy) Community ' Indiv1duaj Wastewater Disposal : Pub Lia (specify) Community x Individual _ Schwa] L District: Fi re District :: General Land Uses iii Area: =.....1-�r�a:',.t2L7:: 1 1 At=5;a-R L1!?l.•- ,__�__ Critical Areas : stream/drainage:+aye flood prone areas _watershed ( speci fy) ..._„historic u itas other(axplain) , S . ALL p lets must be submitted on sheet no sma L Ler than one inch aqua Ls two- hundred feet (1 "=t2O0 r ] and. na Larger than one inch aquals fifty feat (1 "=5U ' ] and must contain the following in-formation : subdivision nem* _ n:rm:a of u-rmar(0] � ::��bu1 Ldin setback Lines :: L;..: : - K; t __4,.. by notation or :}Plcrv:. Lot i tern; �- .Vim: ni .o cat uurvyor, engineer or /:: ? lnyaut / land plan:iar existing end propo-ad a. ad.... ipleted) :3:-: (titlal Prnlininary Plan aunte (drainage, utilities, ;i:.;114 scale, north arrow Werth at / ::;;e: roods', etc.] :'.:: top of nspi ✓- c' :existing, Proposed and :• '� date (including revision detail _--_ : adjoining rights—of—nay toenahip, tax sap—block—Lot -- :_c including dir,errniuna and rafarnncea r.:�:j,ri' <�:;:::: street namaa and state road ._14 boundary described with numbers bearings and distancae 4= existing and proposed :- total acreage of the tract . utilities including :- .,Q end acreage of Lots, including = -: type, sizes, pftend excluding area within --_=: hydrant,, valves and j. rights—of^may -x.;.% manholes - -' control earner i{t':t=::: ••r existing and proposed culvert rC.. - trifi• proposed lot Linea pith : >- including sixes and grades 7 diaeneions .yam typical arrest croae -eaotiona Lot numbers W. and intersection dot-aila phasing lines including design and width =_ $ r topography at ten foot (101 ?`�'; of trtvelaey and shoulders �•.` lntaraaie horizontal alignment and water bodies, streams, flood— .. general curve data (public ::; way and floodpleina •:. '•• roads] . stream buffer* and notation fS:I};;. •/�'.:;; pera5nent features such as __› indicating restricted :i.=y buildings, ceaatarine. / i:X:-" d77eto;Jlaynt pntantiat -' :' hlutoric lnnd.hnr:;s, >/ c,:,:i, : .0 nhfp, corporate soC •.t;:-3— 7-:-:'---.': ` adjuir:il3 lrr- :: :,).'r-itnris 1. pl.znn`.zg :r»:1 . or nzf.Ju (nng 7raue773- 0 :: Lori:^::Ic_iLn Limon 74,iir_[i a:rnaro and sr:'.;Jivivicr:a crav•r :hro prperLy •:',V:,> location sad aix:r of parcula c'odicatud fov. public u�a or rr :,rre,t .F in r_:ox000 . • •: Lor::r':ir;i .r':rI r.i .) of lo7_0 a;' _..:r!..:o ':.. ._v:,;./-. r:il !- .12 ag: -- end no _ .:n u- p ea^oline a 71:7 :r: :ra;n Ao : ion ir'I-]ail-, pravi:.inn r.:r• 7o:1.:rYL the ri i•,t i rrC ' rurtofr frQ:& 1;:oarviov:1 ar,r fac*j lil G. OTHER SUBMITTAL R EUUI R EN ENTS : 1 . Twenty—six [ 26 ] copies of the preliminary plat 2. Two fut. !. size copies of an Orange County Tax map (one copy with tax parcels involved clearly marked) . • 3. Where municipal or O;(ASA eater is not avai Lab la ,. a Letter from the Ork.nge County Pica Lib Department certifying the proposed wastewater system far each Lot. I , the app Li cant, hereby certify that the foregoing app li cation is comp late and accurate. I understand that a $210.00 fee [subdivisions of 15 lots or Lass) or a $370 ,011 fee (subdivisiona of 16 lots or more) is due at the time of application . A $5 .00 per lot fee is due at the time the final plot is presented for recordation . . /161 174/ //6 A-ryr__2 /1"11‘4.4C'-/ APPLICANT 'S SIGNATURE OWNER SIGNATURE 4eal — / /:)...1",Li' 1.7 67 CZ ct�T E %`e — • • FEES: Amount 420°- Date Paid 62-%II& Receipt /t?'/Z-. a g ——• ---....._.t--,-,--_, .... 1.1 . • :1-_j r— 0 72ACtor il 002 _ .., �"j rr- a 4C .�, Ac�av,� �_ �� 1 =Fa; R K v0 I i ' ::.or-: .Tre- . .. . __ 44, • - -. .r . 1 C I•-4 __ r I ` A • I 4 _ � ( • war" itc. 0 4 ! . ZE IN IN WOOTD ,.. !1 \ I .\\R.. r 20 r wsa • _, . owIER: \CtiI% am 1 ilii-ek r- A ; �'' LUP Desilrlocifen: AA Acrcutture - ri _w Re den aI i scale: gone =� • 1 , : !. _ • . 1 1 �� / f _ .. N 1 1 � . �a 0RO / . - C. 1 N/ N/ 23 yid= _ pEtt5ED_� 123 A4. `...- --_,, t_CuEh7 " u:It =_.. .- 1 r I,� .� III ORANGE COUNTY N.C. ( ,�. _-____-__— .....- - - .•1•• - _ ,r r..a.r.+,,,.. MdP�,.. 1970 .�.a.►r.•.a "a•••�r.s uaw CWlE,1AAO 2'J AaDTO kD° i87 SCAM• ra spd wrw.u•n. O • asp-• • • II ENO TOWNSHIP - MAP= I I. .. - u - - - 1 . Ih • 11 `# • 4 , 11/85 DELVIN WOODS ORANGE COUNTY CERTIFICATION AND APPROVALS - PRELIMINARY PLAT STAFF ASSIGNMENT Jane Garrett SKETCH PLAN : Received 4-11-86 _ _ Reviewed 4-:l6-86 PRELIMINARY PLAT: Received 6-30-86 Reviewed 8-13-86 REVISED PRELIMINARY FLAT : Received 8-13-86 Reviewed 8-14-86 NCDOT : DATE CERTIFICATION Joe Hanes - SCHOOL BOARD (Orange/Chapel Hi ll-Carrboro ) : DATE 7-9-86 Certification NA IJTLITIES (OWASA/Hi llsborough/Mebane/Orange Alamance/Durham ) : DATE 6-30-86 Health Department Certification Ran rxnl Ar.i.� OTHER : Recreation Advisory Council _ 7-31-86 MABlack ( Date) Carrboro Fire Department ( Date) Chapel H i l L ( Date) Carrboro [Date ) Hillsborough (Date) Durham 8-18-86 SSuggs ( Date) Other Erosion Control 7-14-a WFairc~ loth-( Date ) (Date) PLANNING• BOARD : Date 8-18-86 Approval Approval with Conditions X Denial BOARD OF COl4MISSIONERS : Date Approval Approval with Conditions Denial .,. 114 COUNTY OF DURHAM DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING&INSPECTIONS August 18, 1986 • Jane Garrett Orange County Planning Department Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 Dear Jane, The proposed Delvin Woods subdivision located on the north side of Bivins Road predominately in Orange County contains several parcels which partially lie in Durham County. Durham County Planning Staff has reviewed this subdivision plan and foresees no conflict in those lots split by the County line. The plan conforms with Durham County's Draft General Development Plan in both land use and lot size. Sincerely your...- , Susan Suggs Operations Planner SS: jh Durham County Judicial Bldg.,201 E. Main Street, Durham,N.C. 27701 Planning Division (919)688-1396 inspections (919)682-5602 Erosion Control (gig)f,RR-1147 r @rang e Tountg Taunt alecreativn ;lab !larks Begx znt .,----7.:,,,r:-.1 M 300 West Trycr-Siree. • - - HILLSBOROUGH, ;J.0 27278 Life.i3,-,.;!;it. Mary Ar. - lack, Director MEMORANDUM T0: Jane Garrett, Planner FROM: Mary Anne Black " DATE: July 30, 1986 RE: Courtesy Review — Manor Hill Subdivision -- Phase II Delvin Woods Subdivision Acres of New Hope: Division of Lot 1, Section 5 Upon review of the preliminary plans for the proposed Manor Hill I Subdivision, Delvin Woods Subdivision, and Acres of New. Hope Division of Lot 1, Section 5, I find no element(s) warranting • _ comment from a recreation and park prospective.• MAB/pbl p 7 5 rjn ,D Hillsborough. 732-9361 o Durham, 688-7333 d Chap Hi!, 968-4501 s Meb; rle, 227-2032 Area Code 919 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 11E ffiLLSBOROUGH NORTH CAROLINA 27278 .012 .1 md 41 QI r Fr ben, ¢.t•` July 8, 1986 Joe Haynes, Highway Maintenance Engineer N.C. Department of Transportation Route 3 Box 3 Hillsborough, NC 27278 Re: Delvin Woods Subdivision Dear Mr. Haynes: Enclosed is the Preliminary Plan of the abovereferenced subdivision for your review. The property is referenced as Tax Map 11 Part of Lot 20A in Eno Township and located on the north side of SR .1573 (Bivins Road) . The Durham and Orange County line intersects the southeastern portion of the property. The applicant is proposing 20 lots to be used for single family units. A public road (Delvin Lane) will be constructed to provide access for all lots in the subdivision. Please provide your comments by August 1, 1986. It will be greatly appreciated. Yours truly, qickt It. bkvt-cs Jane A. Garrett Planner JAG/jg J ou e Enclosure 7-It PR EL_ IM I 1 AIAY P L 14 14 siitov Ly 5tiaLt, ft 7-yFic f L- J C c t i 0 /-1 r rIVA Kip f .ca ve i 7-n--0& .9,--P -A . 0.----1.4..„,_ 11 i ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT HILLSBOROUGH NORTH CAROLINA 27278 MEMORANDUM TO: Jane A. Garrett, Planner FROM: Warren Faircloth, Erosion Control Officer SUBJECT: Stormwater Management Plan for Delvin Woods Subdivision DATE: July 14, 1986 I have reviewed the plan for this subdivision and find that it meets the Ordinance requirements . 4. A it Warren Faircloth 118 h. Delvin Woods -- Preliminary Presentation by Collins. D RAFT This agenda item is to consider approval of the Preliminary Plan for Delvin Woods Subdivision. The property in question is located in Eno Township on the east side of Bivins Road (SR 1573) . It is referenced as part of Lot 20A of Tax Map 11. All lots would have access to the proposed Delvin Land (public) . The tract is bordered by residential (including a 27-unit mobile home part) and undeveloped wooded land. There are 20 lots proposed out of 23.8 acres with an average lot size of 1.07 acres excluding the street right--of-way. The zoning of the property is Agricultural-Residential (AR) as is the Land Use Plan designation. The AR zoning district classifi- cation requires a minimum lot size of 40 ,000 square feet or 0 .92 acres. The health Department has granted approval to all lots in the subdivision. Police protection would be provided by the Orange County Sheriff' s Department, while fire protection would be provided by the Eno Rural Fire District. The 1984 traffic count on Bivins Road (SR 1573) was 200 trips per day. An additional 190 trips per day would be generated by the subdivision. Delvin Lane is to be constructed to NCDOT standards for a local residential street (18 foot wide pavement) and dedicated for public use. 115 DRAFT PBM MINUTES 8-18-86 PAGE 13 There are no creeks or streams flowing through the property. Soils are Georgeville with moderate limitations for septic tanks and slight limitations for dwellings. Planning Staff recommended approval. ' Collins indicated that Durham County Planning Department had been contacted and they indicated no - problems with the development even though some of the lots cross over into Durham County. They noted the development was consistent with their Draft Land Use Plan and development regulations. Collins indicated on a Durham County Tax Map there are two land-locked parcels to the east of the tract under consideration. He continued that the Board might wish to consider requiring a street stub-out to the eastern property line just north of lot 11 to provide access to a landlocked parcel and allow for future connection of Delvin Woods with a subdivision in Durham County further to the east. Kramer inquired of the applicant how he arrived at the lot sizes. The applicant responded that due to the cost of land and development costs, larger lot sizes would not be feasible. He continued that this particular area would not support a larger lot and still have affordable housing. MOTION: Shanklin moved approval. Seconded by Walters. Best moved for an amendment to require a stub-out for a 50 ° right-of-way north of Lot 11 and extending from Delvin Lane to the eastern prof rty line. Seconded by Pilkey. VOTE ON AMENDMENT: 5 in favor. 2 opposed (Walters, Shanklin) . VOTE ON MOTION AS AMENDED: 5 in favor. 2 opposed (Jacobs, Kramer) . O R A N G E C O U N T Y BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 12C ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date ±gm . r_2sJ 986 Actionr4olenda Item , o SUBJECT: MANOR HILL SUBDIVISION (PHASE II ) - PRELIMINARY DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes _.XC_� No Attachment( s)~ - � Information Contact: MARVIN COLLINS Checklist Vicinity Map Preliminary Plan Agency Letters Telephone Numbers Hillsborough -- 732-8181 Durham -- 688-7331 Mebane -- 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 967-9251 PURPOSE : To consider approval of the Preliminary Plan for Manor Hill Subdivision - Phase II . To receive the Planning Board ' s recommendation . NEED: The property in question is located in Chapel Hill Township on the west side of Mill House Road (SR 17250) . It is referenced as part of lot 25B of Tax Map 19 . All lots would have access to the existing Manor Hill Court and Manor Drive ( private) . The tract is bordered by undeveloped wooded land . Phase I of Manor Hill Subdivision was approved as a three- lot minor sub- division on May 26, 1986 . There are 3 lots proposed out of 12.23 acres with an average lot size of 1 .99 acres excluding the street right-of--way. The applicant has also shown a reserved area of 3 .67 acres . The zoning of the property is R-1 Residential , and the Land Use Plan designation is Rural Buffer. The R-1 zoning district classification requires a minimum lot size of 40,000 square feet or 0 .92 acres . IMPACT: The Health Department has granted approval to all lots in the subdivision . Police protection would be provided by the Orange County Sheriff ' s Department, while fire protection would be provided by the New Hope Rural Fire District . 121 The 1984 traffic count on Mill House Road ( SR 1725) was 60 trips per day . An additional 28 trips per day would be gene- rated by the subdivision . Manor Drive and Manor Hill Court are constructed to Class B private road standards . RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Board recommended approval on August 18, 1986 subject to the following conditions: 1 . Flatten the curve on Manor Drive where it intersects with Manor Hill Court in order to accommodate a road alignment which meets NCDOT minimum horizontal alignment criteria ( See Carrboro recommendation #2) . 2 . Assign a lot number to the reserved area indicated on the Plan . The lot number shall be consistent with the exist-- . ing numerical system. WJ .rte PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT ( INK ONLY) 11/85 122• • APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAj- ORANGE COUNTY DATE: Jfay 3(1,1986 _- SUBDIVISION NAME: Manor Hill Subdivision Phase II LOCATION : Chapel Hill Twpa off S. R. 1725 OWNEFI/DEVELOPER : __•Manor_,H, ssocia es ADDRESS: 1829 E. F a kl ` St f, 00 TELEPHONE NO . : (019) 933--58O C r, 1 N C_„ _ 2.7514 AGENT/CONTACT: James H. Holland Jr. RLS TELEPHONE NO . : j9.19J 242. 91(Ol Chanel Hill , N. C. 27514 _" A . SUNMARY INFORMATION : Orange County Tax Hap 19 Block Lot ( s) _251._ Township Eisuglaiiii Zoning Districts) : R.-1 Total Number of Acres : 12.23 Phases : _ atv°_ _ `iota l Number of Lots : 3 Average Lot Si ze : 2_,2a_ Minimum Lot Size _J.., Number/Type of Structurea : ( existing ) 0 (proposed) 3 Lineal Feet in Streets : 1926(exist.) Acres in Open Space S,,37 _ _ Water Supply : Public specify) Community x Indivic:� ' Wastewater Disposal : Public [specify ) Community x Indivi School District: Orange Co. Fi re Di st ri ct : Orange-.New Hc;..,::•v General Land Uses in Area : residential Critical Areas : x stream/drainageways _p_o_flood prone areas no watershed [specify) no historic sites other( explain ) no B . Alt plats roust be submitted on sheet no smaller than one inch squats two— hundred feet (1 "=200 ' 1 and no larger than one inch equals fifty feet (1 "-7:50 ' ) and must contain the following information : ..��f r?cS sub di vi akin naww der'' " C` y . bui lding setback lines !' ,, w nzso of wear(,) ;:;';' by notation or typical lot it ' 5 =its;,',., n'"=' of sur•ytyor, angir447 or • ' Y layout }; Land ptannar :✓ existing and proposed aeae- ylet3d) _, + (title] Preliminary Plan. ___:;_:::i: manta (dralnngo, utilities, - y:;: aoal•, north arrow (North at % roads, etc.) top cf sap] �: i• rxiating, propoaud and dens (including revision dittos) _ = adjoining rights-of-way o-,_ tounrhl tax oe - including dimensions and -t-�:+«r.» D, p-5 lock--lot -- referenca, .tract noses and state road boundary described with number, - :' bearings and distances n • �' � J��'~-=�$ axiating and prapossd - ;w; total acreage of the tract : utilities, including and acreage of Lots, including =- _ type, size., and excluding area within A hydrants, valves and ::'rights—of—may ,/:. manhole* r✓:::- T control corner : exlating and proposed culvert _.L_ i.! proposed lot lines with including sizes and grades dioaneionw �/: typical etreat cross-sections ..AZ; lot nuwb•re :--- and intareaction details _1C I phasing lines ;?=:`•`:•`: including design and width • topography at ten foot (10) of treveLway and shoulders intervals /n\ {/! i% " horizontal all r�:;• V• l,�:.; alignment and aster bodies, streams, flood general curve data (public `/..,I _ way and i'loodplsina . - roads) r"'; atreow buffers end notation ✓ •.-L : permanent features ': indicating restricted b e urea Such e6 _ ., bulldinga, casretarias, n fs daveLoi'. nt potential `= =,. ,✓hiotoric lnnda7rkn, _�.. '.ri.-', to-rr .Ip, carp:rn=n a^d alt-z_ v ir., _ ,(-{tart: L -r n:i:.,-12 of scijo,n l-,� ;,r3;Jr� juris_,.I.-... �.inr l;.-. ,. r,Icr: -f , / — Cr'L0.Y t,9n i,-,rzprr- a4f:ar9 er�d aU0:: ri nl o;. _tN!•__ to( .:1 nn onJ ei zo or p or.7y la ,„tic f,.z0 io; Public ..0.1 Jr sae urvrd :,c•:0, 4_,1- -o.�_,;7_::7- .o ...';i;_,t■r; ,r-% 41-1 .. c.^n crul of ttle MEMMUMMEMMEMMOW PI t'3t i, w :nct• of ripuf: i r;; v tev5r4'ou:r 'ur±".,:J. • 12d OTHER SUBMITTAL REDUfREi•1ENTS : 1 . Twenty—six ( 25 ) copies of the preliminary pCat 2. Two full size copies of an Orange County Tax map (one copy with tax parcels involved clearly marked ) . 3 . Where municipal or OWASA sewer is not avai labia , a Letter from thu Orange County Health Department certifying the proposed wastewater system for each lot . the applicant , hereby certify that the foregoing application is complete and : :scureto . I understand that a $210 .00 fee ( subdivisions of 15 Lots or less ) r a $370 . 00 fee ( subdivisions of 10 lots or , more) .is -_ . due at the time. •- of �pliaation . A $5 .00 per lot. fee is due at the time the final plat is resented for recordation . e7/ /7C1/41.- ,PLICANT ' S SIGNATURE OWNEA 'S SIGNATURE • FEES: Amount #Z1/106)--9" Date Paid _ (o-2'1--eb Receipt I2�51 . . r • ' '...... i 1 - . .1 j t 1 . n.. ---.. 7010 5. . ,021, ..... ...... _. _ j ...... ___•—G--A Li—LEA --takii.60/ I 1 1 ■ 1 T - i. •i0 I 3 - 13-21 AC. . I D° 8.38AC. ; ( 117 2(1C)) IL - ' 0900 . I•• i 0 7.12AC. *-- 144s a 07:13 -7LACK MT Sr40-36 58 c'' :635 CLA) I ... ... 7 . ' el MANOR WILL ft.- PW IE .-557 , 10, 02 AC. 1 2L Lii ONNWER:Pwor51414 q 140.1 Land - __ ..._ II _, 1 i _. WPT)estinO•anorb i: Rural . iii1 i . .1 • . exerier ii,:- j II Sadie: I"= 400' i?‘ , I / N 1 - 1 . / ! IG)- 8 1, ! __.; - .,..,t.. I . ' ' ., li __ - - ;.••••-...----- -- ; .• •67; • r !! _ _ _ ... .4.... _ , I i _ 4 ilb •61 _ AC., 1 -5072 I: 8882 8 Pi-1.46 . . J i I _... „ c) 23.8SA .-1. . 29 . irl C I I 1 -• 4 # . j . I • 7657- ' 20 !NU 18.54 A 1 . 1174 Z.':. 1 H 1 -""= •66E=, -,111 i-- 1, 2 Ar r 3229 I . ' \ : \ \ ii‘r , . . 4 . . \,,,, •ii27 TO 2085 \ 3.60AC 152 - 9.78 AC.C. , • I • . \ 25 ,I196.55AC. I L.__ . I L---". (D7519 f.............. -- . • •nT, .282 ' 24D• 0. / AC IL ;1 26?.8 - , • 3 AC. : \---, ; .98".7A • 'IFI . . . . -la. g a aTA ET 1 1- -- -- -N - -- - --- -- - - - - - -- - \ - • • ■-. , •(..;:b f .. .,- ,....._.. FL/ x . -1 . 2.19AC • ._ - 819 2• • 1160 ,--c . . • . . 1>• 103132 AC . T. -- -.--"---=-:: . ~-- • N • 11/95 MANOR HILL -- PHASE II ORANGE COUNTY CERTIFICATION AND APPROVALS - PRELIMINARY STAFF ASSIGNMENT : Jane Garrett SKETCH PLAN : Received 5--2386 � . _ Reviewed 6-4-86 PRELIMINARY PLAT : Received 6-27-86 Revi ewed 8-13-86 REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT : Received Revi ewed � r NCDOT : DATE 7-23-86 . CERTIFICATION Joe Hanes SCHOOL BOARD (Orange/Chapel Hill-Carrboro ) : DATE 7-9-86Certification NA. UTLITIES (OWASA/Hi L lsbo rou h/Mebane/Orangl1e A lamance/Ju r-hen ) : DATE 7-8-86 Health` Departient "certification T Konsler OTHER Recreation Advisory Council 7-31-86 MABlack (Date] Carrboro Fire Department - (Date) Chapel Hill (Date) Carrboro 8-1-86 GShepherd ( Date) Hillsborough ( Date) Durham ( Date) Other � 7-14-86 WFairc1ath ( Date ) 7-25-8E GGledh—11—(Date] P.LANI'IING BOARD : Date 8-18-86 Approve Approval with Conditions X Denial BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS : Date Approval Approval. with Conditions _,_ Denial 1 r 71 .k 12t tt, +• ! P.O-Box 337 4-. 301 West Main Street 1 a r r b c r o Carrboro,North Carolina 27510 1 !` (919)942-8541 4.:"L. *v T m July 31, 1986 Mrs. Jane Garrett Orange County Planning Department 106 E. Margaret Lane Hillsborough, NC 27278 RE: Manor Hill Subdivision - Phase II Preliminary Plat Courtesy Review Subdivision Dear Jane: The Carrboro Town Staff has completed a review of the subdivision referenced above and offers the following comments: 1. The proposed subdivision is in an area that, in our jurisdiction, would likely be zoned R-40, and therefore would comply with minimum lot size requirements. 2. The private right-of-way for Manor Drive should be modified such that it is contiguous with the southern property line from S.R. 1725 to the south- west corner of lot 2. The present alignment of the private right-of-way will not accomodate a road alignment which meets NCDOT minimum horizontal alignment criteria. Proper alignment must be assured if this road were to be made public or improved to provide proper access to the properties to the west. An alternative to relocating the entire right-of-way would be to flatten the curve on Manor Drive where it intersects with Manor Hill Court. The Town of Carrboro will only recommend approval of the subject preliminary plat with the condition that the right-of-way is modified as indicated above. Lf you have any questions regarding any information in this letter, please do not hesitate to give me a call . Sincerely, qCgr-CIAatiCiMg)) G. Gregory Shepard Zoning Administrator xc: James Holland, Holland Land Surveys -p m • t n HILLSBOROUGH, ti.0 272Td Life. init. Mary Ar..:,_ Black, Director MEMORANDUM TO: Jane Garrett, Planner FROM: Mary Anne Black `- j DATE: July 30, 1986 RE: Courtesy Review -- Manor Hill Subdivision -- Phase II • Delvin Woods Subdivision Acres of New Hope: Division of Lot 1, Section 5 Upon •review of the preliminary plans for the proposed Manor Hill Subdivision, Delvin Woods Subdivision, and Acres of New Hope . . Division of Lot 1, Section 5, I find no- element(s) warranting - comanent from a recreation and park prospective. - MAB/pbl EECE VE • • • Hillsborough, 732-9381 Durham, 688-7333 A Chapel Hill, 958-4501 • Mebane, 227-2032 Area Code 919 • ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT HILLSBOROUGH 12 e NORTH CAROLINA 27278 ,e60,01 a,G ,P s `/4 a•c•„ July 8, 1986 Joe Haynes, Highway Maintenance Engineer N.C. Department of Transportation Route 3 Box 3 Hillsborough, NC 27278 Re: Manor Hill Subdivision - Phase II Dear Mr. Haynes: Enclosed is the Preliminary Plan of the abovereferenced subdivision for your review. The property is referenced as Tax Map 19 Part of Lot 25B in Chapel Hill Township and l Fated on the west side of SR 1725 (Mill House Road) approximately 1650"feet north of the intersection of SR 1725 and SR 1726 (Clyde Road) . The applicant is proposing three (3) lots to be used for single family units. Two Orange .County Class "B" private roads will be constructed from SR 1725 to provide access for the lots in the subdivision. Please provide your comments by August 1 , 1986. It will be greatly appreciated. Yours truly, Q • ' Jane A. Garrett Planner JAG/jg L4..” t; v F F tw rL r cf c d r6 L L G t r.t- ti L.- '1'7:5: Enclosure I , 5 / 6,H-7-- 4 t S i l-f G44 I S f; A 0 µ w12: P4=-7- ; ,1-1 i tLtC,t,t0 L- `1-23-8( 5iNcaz `�•�r IN ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 12 a. LEILLSBOROUGH NORTH CAROLINA 27278 '.-. .r oil T. `vim. et* too MEMORANDUM TO: Jane A. Garrett, Planner FROM: Warren Faircloth, Erosion Control Officer SUBJECT: Manor Hill Subdivision Phase II DATE: July 14, 1986 I have reviewed the plan for this subdivision and find that it meets the Ordinance requirements . 1 base this recommenda- tion on the size of the lots, the limited impervious surface added to the site, and the lack of any additional paved road being added and not the detention of runoff in a pond that is not located on this site. rr '' 1l / /� 1414, Warren Faircloth Clitt?,t,li) 1-i4- COLEMAN, BERNHOLZ, DICIKERSON, BERNHOLZ, GLEDHILL & HARGRAVE ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1 3 C, • 110 CHURTON STREET 1 lr HILLSBOROUGH,N.C. 27278 919-732-2196 919-942-8000 CHAPEL HILL OFFICE SUITE 20,FRANICLIN BUILDING 137 E_FRANKLIN STREET CHAPEL HILL,N.C.27514 919-929-7151 July 23, 1986 ALONZO B.COLEMAN,JR. STEVEN A.BERNHOLZ DONALD R.DICE ERSON ROGER B.BERNHOLZ GEOFFREY E.GLEDHILL DOUGLAS HARGRAVE MARTIN J.BERNHOLZ RICHARD J.SNIDER,JR. JANE G.do LISSOVOY Jane A. Garrett G.NICHOLAS HERMAN LYNN A.ANDREWS Planner OlC. e, Orange County Planning Department BONNER D.SAWYER 106 East Margaret Lane (19021972) Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 Re: Manor Hill Subdivision - Phase II Dear Jane: The road maintenance agreement for Phase II of Manor Hill Subdivision (actually all of Manor Hill Subdivision) accompanying your July 8, 1986 letter to me in form satisfies the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. Very truly yours, r"-o = re , ledhill GEG/lsg 131 g. Manor Hill (Phase II) - Preliminary D RAFT Ph resentation by Collins. This agenda item is to consider approval of the Preliminary Plan for Manor Hill Subdivision -- Phase II. The property in question is located in Chapel Hill. Township on the west side of Mill House:: Road (SR 1725) . It is referenced as part of lot 25B of Tax Map 19. All lots would have access to the existing Manor Hill Court and Manor Drive (private) . The tract is bordered by undeveloped wooded land. Phase I of Manor Hill Subdivision was approved as a three-lot subdivision on May 26r 1986. There are 3 lots proposed out of 12.23 acres with an average lot size of 1.99 acres excluding the street right-of-way. The applicant has also shown .a reserved area of 3.67 acres. The zoning of the property is R-1 Residential. and the Land Use Plan designation is Rural Buffer. The R-1 zoning district classification requires a minimum lot size of 40.000 square feet or .092 acres. The Health Department has granted approval to all lots in the subdivision. Police protection would be provided by the Orange County Sheriff' s Department. while the fire protection would be provided by the New Hope Rural Fire District. The 1984 traffic count on Mill House Road (SR 1725) was GO trips per day. An additional 28 trips per day would be generated by the subdivision. Manor Drive and Manor Hill Court are constructed to Class B private road standards. An intermittent stream flows through the northeast portion of the tract and a 30-foot drainage easement has been provided. Planning Staff recommended approval . subject to the following condition: Flatten the curve on Manor Drive where. it i.nter- sects with Manor Hill Court in order to accommodate a road alignment which meets NCDOT minimum horizontal alignment criteria per Town of Carrboro 134 DRAFT PBM MINUTES 8-18-86 PAGE 12 courtesy review recommendation. Yuhasz inquired the number of lots now using Manor Drive. Collins responded that 3 lots from Phase I are using Manor Drive. Yuhasz continued asking if those owners now using Manor Drive would have to give permission for the road alignment to be changed. Collins responded that the owner would basically just be donating more right-of.-way. Yuhasz inquired if the reserved area had a separate lot designation. Collins responded that such an area was usually considered a residual lot. area. MOTION; Yuhasz moved approval with staff conditions and the added condition that the reserved area be assigned a lot number. Seconded by Pilkey. VOTE: Unanimous. O R A N G E C O U N T Y BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 13� ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date Septe rater 2, 1986 Action A enda Item f __ SUBJECT: Acres of New Hope: Division of Lot #1 of Section 5 Preliminary Plan DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING _,Yes �C _. No Attachment( s) Information Contact: Jane Garrett Application Vicinity Map Agency Comments Preliminary Plan Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 PURPOSE: To consider approval of the Preliminary Plan for the division of Lot #1 - Acres of New Hope, property of Robert Chandler, 11 . To receive the Planning Board ' s recommendation . NEED: The property in question is located on Seminole Trail (an existing Class B private road) in Chapel Hill Township . The property is referenced as Lot 19 of Tax Map 2. It is bordered by residential development . The tract is designated as Rural Residential on the Land Use Plan . There are two (2) lots proposed out of 4 .01 acres. The lot sizes are 1 .57 acres and 1 .62 acres excluding the rights-of- way. The property is zoned R-1 (Rural Residential ) . Fire protection for the property is provided by the New Hope Fire District. Law enforcement is provided by the Orange County Sheriff ' s Department. IMPACT: There are no traffic counts available for Seminole Trail as it is not within the Department of Transportation ' s system. However, given that only one ( 1 ) new lot is being created, development of this subdivision would generate ten ( 10) addi- tional trips per day . RECOMMENDATION : The Planning Board recommended approval of the Preliminary Plan on August 18, 1986 . -S. . 11. ... •PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT ( iNK ONLY) 11/33 • APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION APP9(7VAI, 139 ORANGE COUNTt • SUBDIVISION NAME: -r:o `- /�'('' / r//(10- 1('-' •') ,, +/1. - �.. „ 1 '• . LOc,AT1 cm �l-r i ,'���%()%-:z%/,/ fir C111e-V&A/VC :Dr/4 c :'11) / rli 1, is--- r• ' f 011Nr~r7./D El/ELOPER: , rr/1;7r- • /1 _ G,h i?, 71' :" __1 TELEPHONE NO . : 7:0 •• c AGENT/CONTACT: . i\// ' TELEPHONE NO . : A e SUMMARY 7 NF O ITT nla_ . Orange County Tax Map _,�--1 Block . Lot (s) /1 Township ( /1/cc�l Pi ft Zoning DIstrictCs] : / -) Tots I_ Number of Acres : <.-`.rti _ phases : Iota l P9umber of Lots: „,..'.7-_ Average Lot Si zt: : t 5 Minimum Lot Si zv j '. _ Number/Type of Structures : [ existing) . AI; -_ _.,,(proposed) Lineal P=een in Streets: •,` i,..'i� •J'V9 Acres in Open Space 1\'/71 Water supply: Public(specify) Community rt• .Individual Wastewater Di sposa 1: __ Pub Li c(sp oci fy) _Community. V Individual. School district: ±1' 't-� '-; ;t;0i L Fire District /�'; =-+:r- fit-:O Gen era l Lend Uses in Area: f-,P 'r;, FJ, --:r -""r--" Critical Areas : /OA st-ream/drainagewaye _ //4fLoad prone areas -'YS',, /0.0 watershed (specifyl rr'/i)historic sites ' other(expLein] • B. ALL. p Late must be submitted on sheet no sr;;a l Ler than one inch aqua Is two— hundred feet (1 "=20011 and. no larger than one inch aquals fifty feet (1 'i=50 l ) and must contain the following information: eubdivisiv;, rt;:zs.a v L'.ti 1.11:58 outback linen ■'`� nacre of orrnar(nl .:' naeaa of sure r ar, engineer or j n� :tir.,n up typical lot •i•✓ Land plane:,, ALL • e latirr and proposed =i1 listed t/ :3r?:`•:;': l! - .y--. 9 P Pacedcasa- '' p ) nrT :4:s (title) Prelicrinary Plan :,,:,; nanta (drainage, utilities. N!::.!::.:: scale, north arrow (Borth at ` / r2uda, etc-) top of mapl Y :!sS: axiating, proposed and dots (including revision datael :_ adjoining rights-of-may "! townahip., tax map - iot - inctueln g dimensions and rslerancsx _•::•'�:< Street names and state road ., boundary deecribad with ii,,,, nunbara .;: bearings and dietanaea /(. saluting and proposed . s✓• - total earepge of the tract ut1litiee, including and acreage of lots, including t typo, aizas and excluding area within ^.' y ' ;::,r •'-• • hydrants. valves and rights-of-,ray �:�{t ,�_:. manholes • control corner f� / +I76t exi at ing end proposed culvert r-- . „ proposed let tines with �"`= including size, and grade, :Y dimensions :�' : typical street crone-sections sl • - lot numbers�+*1+� and intersection details e ::'r2-4, phasing Linea "�^ 33;' ; Including design sod width $:k;; topography at ten foot (10) ` / "a:_ of trevetwey and shoulders ''' interval, V ''. horizontal alignment",4'? rotor bodias. streams, flood- i* and _ _" : general eu:vn data (public } . •1'i: way and floodpinine ✓a `,}''• roads' __ ,:j. strops burfero and notation /''•� �' '-'' perrnann:,t faaturee such so indictiting r,ztrictad < 6ulldincn, c-amttarina, d:i431-;on:,nt pot„ntiul _-_ - 1-..1 , '.ors .r9'_u t:1,! 3--7A— :, j0i:rin:f the:-I t•�ri I, ,. - .___ _,.�. - 1:,�.: Cnyuut P L.•n. r;.;,a:, cr .idjnirti:.' ;—•o p'±rty juri. ;lc::lan lieu:! r,hicn cr,7ro end sugdivi :icaa croaz tf , pr:»n7°9 ` 'f'';i 1 ca_ier. ^nd ;iz:: ;, parcr•ln C:xilc:r`L1d 1'q^ public ui:^, or _- -t, cserv,d err, .,.:. ,n r• i sl l r: 3,,a ..•.y..... :n C i t,l r ..I J C:' o t ;7 L u n i i 1:i 7::l c i:,_f ..r r v 4 r i,o.7 For II r c f t h i C . OTHER SUBMITTAL RECUIRE LENTS : 13E 1 . Twenty—six [26 ) copes of the preliminary plat 2. Two full size copies of an Orange. County Tax map [one copy with ta) parcels involved clearly marked) . 3 . Where municipal or OWASA sewer is not avai lab Le , a letter from tha OrangE County Health Department certifying the proposed wastewater syste41 for each Lot,. I , the applicant , hereby certify that the foregoing application is complete any accurate . I understand that a $210.00 fee ( subdivisions of 15 Lots or leas' or a $370.00 fee [subdivisions of 16 Lots or more) is due at the time al app Licatf rsra . A $5.00 per Lot fee is due at the time the f''ina l plot i E presented for recordation .. 776.7-1 _ /f APPLICANT 'S SIGNATURE OWNER 'S SIGNATURE /e.e (//7 DATE / / DATE / • r • i;' � l J FEES: Amoun I . U Date Paid /2-6 16 Receipt /234Ip /...\ . . _ ./, ce Rs),. F.,,,„, 5- - or . NEP' ', Hi o Pzi . . _ _ b k 6,1 A l':J C. I. it 13 AFpucANT .- R.O0E2T cl4A.uD - XOF!1 2-I kLitz_AL. IL!✓bIDE/11-1Al. LIAP Dg5161,1A-0o�l : Ru2AL. R„t=.IDE•�nAL goo t 1 . . • 1 \ . __ 1 OT266 . 2 , __ s al---A-Fa, .1 W/4-tip f - DUKE POWE=R CO_ - 15 4152 R/W �I �,. 7.I AC. i 13.8 AC. r -- _� SEGTtpN -- 07.883 U ; o �- , r s2 5 2 8.68 AC. - SECTION 4 • , 01620 14 8 AC. . 17. 6 AC. - •8411 / • i 1 - 12.66 AC. I , 5AC. 8.09 A C. I — r - >PY�T. F'J.4 L7 �- -- ► ~�,-r_o_B '` ----- — _ ___ -F- I S>wti T i G v 2 j\,:.-r, 0.3619 12 0626 a.C7 g 7. 92 AC• 2 1 8557 1 10 I?_ AC t =� B , -4 17.3 AC 6 ' 1l.77AC �-. / , , Z92AC- I . 13.71 AC. . - - 7355 . - ---1 I 1 6SA r Yr� 5 5 A 1• Ju l a \,___.- , �_ � r 5229 - - 1.4 AC'-.,0-. ,. . ---13NI--- ' . iffe ..... ..,..„2 58� z e • ! BE-NEON sr%:/ 19g 8. 37 AC ►7a5.9 R 31, __ ` r/ �� 162 2; it 44 AC'• . (i) s,,,--.;,-c,,, _,,,..,---,c5. ..-4 /, 14/ r' 4 5.5A , i,,,',3-; r---'\,. 1 ' — 1.='-,-, ---‘ TL- 77' --- r-1-- 1 Acres of New Hope: Division of Lot 1 of Section 5 13; 11/85 ORANGE_COUNTY CERTIFICATION AND APPROVALS PRELIMINARYLtT STAFF ASSIGNMENT : Jane A. Garrett SKETCH PLAN : Recei ved 5-28-86 Revi ewed 6--1+-86 —_ PRELIMINARY PLAT : Recei ved 6-26-86 -_ Rev ewed 7-7-86 REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT : Received na Revi ewed NCDOT : DATE 7-23--86 CERTIFICATION Joe B. Haynes- Hwy. Maintenance Enjincer SCHOOL BOARD (Orange/Chapel Hi lL-Carrboro ) : DATE 7-9-86 Certification Trollinger 11TLITIES (O1,ASA/Hi l Lebo rough/Mebane/Orange A larnance/Uu rham ) ; DATE na _ Certification OTHER : Recreation Advisory Council 7-31-86 _ (Date) Carrboro Fire Department ( Date ) Chapel Hi LL � Vw ( Date') Carrboro _ ( Date) Hi 1. Lsborough (Date ) Durham ( Date ) Other Other Health Dpt. 10-21-85 ( Date ) Soil & Erosion Control • 7-8-86 (Date) f�LANNINC BOARD : Date 8--18-86 Approval _ X Approval with Conditions _ Denial BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS : Date _ Approval Approval with Conditions _ Denial • . . 3 E @range C. r-Lntritg Ttlerrtation anb Par1is rtment 300 ‘V.z.:.:;*. Tror:Siti:r.; -• • -44—A4 • H!LLSBr..)!ia.IGH, NC_ 27278 Lif2.132.in it. Ma v B!ack, Director • MEMORANDUM TO: ' Jane Garrett/ Planner • FROM: Mary Anne Black yty/6 DATE: July 30, 1986 RE: Courtesy Review -- Manor Hill Subdivision -- Phase 11 Delvin goods Subdivision Acres of New Hope: Division of .Lot 1, Section 5 • • • Upon review of the preliminary plans for the proposed Manor Hill • Subdivision/ Delvin Woods Subdivision, and Acres of New Hope • • Division of Lot 1, Section 5, I find no element(s) warranting comment from a recreation and park prospective. MAB/pbl • HJ. H• • 7:32-`11. ;i1 GS3-7333 227-211:0 Art->-! Co'.1f2 919 • • • ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT z0ROUGIx 13 - NORTH CAROLIN 27278 • it'^f.4 _ r • `�4 Co•° July 8, 1986 Joe Haynes, Highway Maintenance Engineer N.C. Department of Transportation • Route 3 Box 3 Hillsborough, NC 27278 Re: Acres of New Hope - Division of Lot 1 of Section 5 Dear Mr. Haynes: Enclosed is the Preliminary Plan of the abovereferenceci subdivision for your review. The property is referenced as Tax Map 2 Lot 19 in Chapel Hill Township and located at the intersection of Cheyenne Drive and Seminole Trail approximately 1100 feet west of NC Highway 86. The applicant is proposing two (2) lots to be used for single family units. . Please provide your comments by August 1 , 1986. It will be greatly appreciated. Yours truly, IL. ),)It-itAtt-t- Jane A. Garrett Planner JAG/j g Enclosure 7FI 1 5 1 l 5 )4 < c, f y-S i ' et- . j- S r 0 ; : w 1 4 - f ... , -41mQ,MW6roXimErifffrgrzwznorr6vraemel,..... , Acres of New Dope: Division of Lot #t1 of Sect en 5 Preliminary Plan DAFTPresentation by Garrett. This agenda item is to consider approval of the Preliminary Plan for the division of Lot 1Fl, - Acres of New • Hope, property of Robert Chandler, II. - The property in question is located on Seminole Trail (an existing Class B private road) in Chapel Hill Township. The property is referenced as Loy 19 of Tax Nap 2. It is bordered by residential development. The tract is designated as Rural Residential in the Land Use Plan. There are two (2) lots proposed out of 4 .01 acres. . - The lot sizes are 1.57 acres and 1.62 acres • . excluding the rights--of-way. The property is zoned . R--1 (Rural Residential) . There are no traffic counts available for Seminole Trail as it is riot within the Department of Transportation' s system. However, given that only one (1) new lot is beirvj created, developm ant of this subdivision Woul_,, generate ten (10) addi iti.onal- •tri.ps per day. - Planning Staff recommended approval of the Preliminary Plan. NOTION: Shanklin moved approval. Seconded by Kramer . VOTE: - Unanimous. O R A N G E C O U N T Y• 141 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date e_ptemteL_2, 1986 • Action A enda item �_. SUBJECT: Moreland -- Preliminary Plan DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING _ Yes _X__ No Attachment(s) Information Contact: Eddie Ki rk Application Vicinity Map Map of Lot P6 Erosion Control Letter D .O .T. Letter Recreation Letter Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham -- 688-7331 Mebane -- 227-2031 Chapel H i l l - 968-4501 PURPOSE : To consider approval of the Preliminary Plan for Moreland Subdivision . NEED : The property in question is located in Cheeks Township on SR 1343 (Doe Run Road ) . It is referenced as lot 31A on Tax Map 6 . There are 9 lots proposed out of a 9 . 61 acre tract . The tract is designated as Agricultural Residential on the Land Use Plan . The 9 lots proposed average .99 acres in size outside of the right-of-way . The property is zoned Agricultural Residential (A-R) . A class "B" private road (Banks Road) is proposed off Doe Run Road . Fire protection for the property is provided by the E:flcnd Rural Fire District . The Health Department has approved all lots for septic tanks except Lot / 5 . However, an easement for the septic tank and. nitrification field has been designated on Lot 6 . The easement must be described on the final plat by metes and bounds and a separate easement document recorded with the final plat . i-)eve ! , ;:;-,r:nt of this subdivision ‘;o,iIc; c.; Cs: i : 9 ne':ti lo; : i n acc: 5. n [)n n:; i1 ! cad i , i h = i u , ;, t; r ( -J �.: iHi ir ( lic cooN1 c, i 142 • run through the property and it is presently wooded . RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Staff recommends approval . The Planning Board recommends approval subject to lot 5 being designated of restricted development potential since a septic system cannot be located on this lot . The Planning Board also recommends deletion of the septic easement on lot 6 for lot 5 . • • APPI„ICATIOfl PC] SLJ ilIVISION- A C1RAt1ia 14� • DATE: �zrr °.. . • SLi E a I V I S S g i NA kg E: Tai 04'_x-1-•,A W\ _ _.--.--- LOCATION: `Y TEtU &C1'i U.11- i oE� 1Z_ _ -02. C1- �- S -1 JP- Ai]DAESS: . ,..,_ ........,.. ____. TELEPHONE NG .: AFya`E �i/CC1;ti17'ACT: r vY�1n t� },c- _ TELEPHONE. NO SZrL'P° -- .a.. SLI31HAPY INFORNATIOi3: . . { . Granger -County Tax. Hap Block Lot f s3 31,E TaWu .hip , _ Zoning r3istrictis3 : Total Number of Acres : . t -_ Phases: 1 iota L Number or Lots : -__ __ Average Lot Si zee 1,42,Z______ Miri imum Lot Si zz- t.c • P3umhar/Typa- of Structures ; Cexisting] . F ..-fprapased).A�C . Lineal. Feat in S• rest: : !0d Acres in Op n Space ._. Water Supply: , ,Pub1iectspecify] Community .�:-.. Individx • Wastewater Disposal: Pub Licrepacifyl Community n `indivtdt School District:: __ Pi r•n 7i st ri ct: - GeriaraL. Land Uses in Area: /6Ga\cut..-7it,,.dl.. k"L3)7F+---7-t;tilt_- ...�.. Critical Areas: s 9ream/dreinagewaya _flood prone areas : . watershed Cepeci fy) _hi s.torfc iii • •B.- Alt plats no CI18at ba submitted on sheet n smelter than on FL e . lncfio- squats 1 hundred feet (1 "=2039 and. no Larger than one inch aquoLs fifty • Etnz---r0' 3 and must contain the fa L liming in fa r coati on : _ _ 1 v + , �7 subdiv ton Haen ;-• nnae of Hoer{x) �; ; buiLding oat-beck Linea ::: .f. by notation or typical Eat: acL• it€m y -{ nss. of surveyor, engineer or ✓ .3/:' , tayatat :;1 innd ,' ,,In,01- . cxiatinsl and propoand esglt-- . F.p1-eted) 4 i, t7.1t•1.-,? Pr-trt1e__1 i:y Pizn :;::; =:;, de.^"x8 (slt'u.r7.J:a� uti Litt -i '• St�a ale:�L<•a, r:;�_•-'t • error, (NrJr`i ti read9, a ao.•) _ •::•.• :-....; top ui ,:,rpl .L..n ' exi:��'It+g. Pr"vpas:rPd Ord' - - „-?I`< dates f 7:7oLud;ng rrrvieion datas1 "•:_ adjoining righra--o —»sp --- ::;4,,• torss:eMp, tax nap-blook--tor r:: tnciu[iing die-ancient; sn ::";;3 rroN,r2ocv:a •: :P;;ti steel, nnmxa and `z va roof; µ :t Coundmry described with 4 number - da+eringn and dimtarase ; exi:e1ing and - proposed ;.• {,:" total acreage of the tract 4.Z.-: utilities. tools/diore. 2:::•::-:3 and norsege of late, including type, raiz:tt, • and excluding area within - c{�:=� hydrxnte, veLvua and rights--er--say •'": nanheten . ry control corner ..�;;.:;_,,, exiting and prepama:: cutvmrt. ,,,r.. i;44.;;; prapo and Lot Linen with . . / f 6 including sizes end grads* - • s _ dlawnsione L 7sl typical atrmvs cross—aaptions Lot numtbers : end interemotian Cetai lr w✓ phnatng Linea {: :' including daaign and aidtf - _f topography or tan root (101 j�1� of travotrri y end sNamLdsrT �-•• intervalm f;_;;, horizontal atigneent • and xstar bvdian, etretsw',s, rlaed— general curve data Lpual_cc way and floodpLaino / roadel straws buffers and notation % ; pertaanent features such se" • - EM Indic:rating rantrlctbd M.: buildings, cestatParlac, '1;- duunl.apl,mmt pntan~1at >-l: historic Landmarks. - to�-:,:,hqn, c:fr•trlr-+t:r c�nc3 r.c�r�-- " �•' nd olnin�; -._. ; � �:.:., f Lot [cyovt ar; ::. ,ric.., pL:•nr=Sns ttanN_ or :;dfciitinc Ftrt,i•;.r.•y . J,:1_1 1.a: , W`., h ry_:Pier Ji ni;LP ,,.. , .. :i±. .... .:;,e.. : , :r, te..� .-.• : r....:r'.....,.. dstra::t- ... . N3rf,o::i . cnd • • • 14 . -• 50R. 1I TAL. REC.UIREMENTS: _ - _ • f,enty—six MS] copies of' the preliminary plot • Tra full l L si zr copies of am Oran=ge County 'fax - mop to copy with -1 parcels .involved clearly marked] . : 5. Where municipal or .OWASA sewer is not available, a latter from the- Over County Health Depertmor:t certifying the . proposed wastewater sy.stern- 7 each Lot . . . - the applicant, hereby csrti ?y that the foregoing application is cogs} Late 1 .:urate►_ X understand that a. $21O.ne fee ( subdivisions of 75- Iota or} LeJ o 13370 .1.10 foe (subdivisions o-f 16 Lute or snore] is dare . at the tine p Li cat i on . A $5.0a per Lot. fee in due at the time the final_ plat. Llsontod for recordation. - - _ .---1---g..P.,.:ez; ...,,,i . . ., - .. - - - - 1 P id "S SIGNATURE . . f VIN 'S SIGNATURE .422.j____._____________ . _. ,, 0;4) • . . . . •DATE ` - • FEES: Amount 2JC,.0(0 .Date Paid a • Receipt /2 /40 - _ • p • 14L MORELAND 11/85 ORANGE COUNTY CERTIFICATION AND APPROVALS PRELIMINARY PLAT STAFF ASSIGNMENT:.. Eddie. Ki rk SKETCH PLAN : Received 6-23-86 Reviewed 6-25-86 w� PRELIMINARY PLAT : Received 6-27-86 _ Reviewed 7-2-86 REVISED PRELIMINARY FLAT : Received _ Reviewed NCDOT : DATE 7-12-86 CERTIFICATION - J. M. Mills . SCHOOL BOARD (Orange/Chapel Hi ll7 Carrboro) : DATE 7-2-86_Certification N/A UTLI T IES (OWASA/Hi L lsbo roucn;h/Mebane/Orange A lamance/uu r-ham ) : DATE 8-7-86 _ Certification Health Dept. OTHER : Recreation Advisory Council 8-7-86 (Date) Carrboro Fire Department ( Date) Chapel Hill (Date) Carrboro (Date) Hillsborough (Date) Durham (Date) Other ( Date) (Date) PLANNING BOARD : Date 8-18-86 Approval X Approval with Conditions Denial - BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS : Date App rova L _ Approval with Conditions Denial - -a \ !OD - 1r� REALTY e R� H1 LG \ Q43 4 •4475 JAMES 83341. t 1.83 `/AC: IIA ` 5395 0\.� . \\ � AC 144 \�\ i,02 AC T MORELAND ►QZ Applicant : STEVE YUHASZ 8.99 AC Zone : A - R .-1 !� -7738 \-------:-....„.s.N V. . 1° Z Designation : Agricultural -77 41:4 19.34 ac-C g 6-�2 A // 56. ,IT Residential 2.7. 3A."- Scale:e: III 400 I _ ___.__ j 14ty .3251 '/ 1 5 Ell) 0 \\ 4.64 AC-X/ • l _________. 5914 11.89AC• \\ /• / f--- 3554C /_, _____,v.\ ___9 \I/. 7,\. ,1 ` a:r31' Y/. ,,r _ Esser 1 1.21 A:. . 1525 / \ '// ' \ 41 33 6368 / 1 3 1.O2AC. // 1 4" /� 1 � ` 318 \___________-------------- 0 40/,_J1VY \\ 35 ` . �►C / --I r_ \\\ !; 21.1 AC. 69e0 z// I \ ' - 5739 0 33 AC. 1 - // 8741 1829 \,1 8�,O2AC` _- �:1 145 AC. 32 \I-61 t I-15 r 6 . • 75? 14.82 IC. ° ' •4441 • ` ` 7.94 AC. ell / 8325 5 .48AC. -i .7382 its k.—//•�9�y 0 51 i' Ea•DIt9aC- ��V.7 � � / � 4 1 1 960 =rte ~ /i 1 AC- 7:04 8140 `�� I .18 AC.. 36'D.• - �I.!r� I AC A_______ ;' CI t!8�t� a1 6-6)CAL I AC. 186 09x7 `" s rp s �_ �!� --- , rz7a s ./:Y-- (1)\ WI - [306 WIC apps `_ - k 1 1 c 2552 t 7409 '�I I 0417\j f 9451 -! 1 i 27 \- II 14/ 7.- --- ------ . Le. T S 34A/1‹,3 I L.4 I . • Uw Soso . � sysr OA )c30 $ Fox. 8 14Q6.4 ' /A/c.4. J,L Iv: / �w Y ■ lip S 4 R w,Es.L. rt,voirvg- It 1 \ ) IA \ saw' 1 O coo 5 Tx. ' . s VS r21,0 Qp Q AK/- o N Ua_v.,. \ \ 1 AICacq, ds ,[or 7 i: 1-______ &o.co 1-0r 6 \ 1 \ 1 ....5-e-4.4e- /�ytp ' 74..5:5-- • I • i 4 RANGE COUNTY PLAI:TIlYG DEPARTMENT BILLBBOROUGH NORTH CAROLINA 27278 • vol. 'to MEMORANDUM TO: Eddie Kirk, Planner FROM: Warren Faircioth, Erosion Control Officer SUBJECT: Stormwater Management Plan, for Moreland Subdivision DATE: July 14, 1986 I have reviewed the plan for this subdivision and find that it meets the Ordinance requirements . 1111101.161C" Warren Faircioth srn STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Graham, NC 27253-0766 JAMES G. MARTIN GOVERNOR July 11, 1986 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS JAMES E. HARRINGTON SECRETARY • Orange County Mr. Marvin Collins Orange County Planning Department 106 East Margaret Lane Hillsborough, NC 27278 Subject-: Preliminary Plan for Moreland and Pins Forest Subdivision Dear Mr. Collins: We have reviewed the preliminary plan for the above developments and offer the following comments: 1. Moreland Subdivision off SR. 1343, Doe Run Road A. Sight distance is adequate • B. Driveway permit is required 2. Pine Forest Subdivision off SR 1567, Pleasant Green - Road A. There is not enough information to locate the development in the field. If there are any questions, please advise. Yours very truly, J. . Mills D 'STRI_CT ENGINEER JMM/JBH:jbh 15U fi' ":• (Orange (1:_auittU 3.eLI c:ititl?I fl 3Park's IieptwtL imn t t rryon Street - - N C. 77278 - `!e. 'stl • ..ick: Director . MEMORANDUM 4) P'• TD: Eddie Kirk, Plannner cP 41!)n FROM: Mary Anne Black '7 DATE: August 5, 1986 . , RE: Courtesy Review ---- Moreland Subdivision . Sunset Ridge Subdivision Pine Forest Subdivision Upon review of the preliminary plans for the proposed Moreland and . Sunset Ridge Subdivisions, I -find only one element warranting colmuent from a recreation and parks perspective, namely the subject prop rtie ` - proximity to the large recreation area at Lake Michael, owned by Town of Mebane and developed partially with Orange County monies.. The open-space needs of the residents of these subdivisions could be . - easily served by the area at Lake Michael. . In that the Pine Forest Subdivision does not appear to be a: !major" subdivision, I will not provide comment. Contact it if comments are - . - needed, however. MAB/pbl • • • • • Hillsborough, 732-9361 • Oumarn, • Chape' H . 963-4501 ' Mebart 227-2i132 - :.ode 919 d. Moreland -- Preliminary Plan 151 Pry e ni a.-tion by Co:!! l ,. This agenda item is to consider approval Of the f ` ; x. Preliminary Plan for Moreland Subdivision. The property in question is located in Cheeks Township on SR 1343 (Doe Run Road) . it is referenced as ].ot 31A on Tax Map 6. There are 9 lots proposed out of a 9 .61 acre tract. The 9 lots proposed average .99 acres in size outside of the right-of-way.a y. The property is zoned Agr� cultural Residential (A-R) . A Class "B' private road (11an.ks Road) is proposed off Doe Fun Road. Fire protection for the property is provided by the Efia,nd Rural Fire District. The Health Depa r :.;ent has approved all lots for septic tanks e,:c;i,\t lot 415. However, an easement for the septic tank and nitrification fiefs has been designated lot l r i 6. The easement rust be described on the final plat by metes and bound : and a separate ease::; :nt document record;rd with the ' final plat. Development of subdivision would create 9 new lots with access to Do Run Road. Doe Run Road in 1982 had an average daily traffic count of 160. There are no streams that run through the property and it is presently wooded. Planning Staff r_e� L\mr:ienc:;s approval lots 5 e"_... d cori.�.; ;_ls with septic fields :� , - 6 that there was ire,; _S uZ f:s-c;_e;x.t distance between the two septic fields. The applicant noted that this had heerl approved by the Orange County Health Department. Shanklin noted concern with placing lateral lines for a lot on an adjacent lot, MOTION: Shanklin moved -approval with plat indicating Lot unbuildable. Seconded by Kramer. VOTE: 5 in favor. 2 opposed. 1 abstained (Yuha;:; -- due to professional conflict - of interest) . O R A N G E C O U N T Y BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 152 ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date September 2, 19$6 Action nda - Item _ SUBJECT: Pine Forest - Preliminary Plan DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes�� X Na Attachment( s) Information Contact: Eddie Kirk Application Vicinity Map Erosion Control Letter D .O.T. Letter Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel H i l l - 968 -4501 PURPOSE : To consider approval of the Preliminary Plan for Pine Forest Subdivision . NEED: The property in question is located in Eno Township on S.R. 1567 (Pleasant Green Road ) . It is referenced as part of lot 19B on Tax Map 17 . There are two lots proposed out of an 65 acre tract. One lot is proposed to be 1 .6 acres and the other lot 1 .55 acres . The area is designated Agricultural Residen- tial in the Land Use Plan . The property is zoned Agricultural. Residential (A-R) with both lots having state road frontage. Fire protection will be provided by the Eno Rural Fire District . IMPACT: Development of two lots in this area will add an additional 19 trips per day to Pleasant Green Road . In 1985 , the most recent traffic count, there were 1300 trips per day on Pleasant Green Road . The property is relatively level without streams and presently wooded . RECOICENDATION: The Planning Board recommends approval . . -15� PINE FOREST - - 11/85 - ORANGE COUNTY CERTIFICATION AND APPROVALS -- PRELIMINARY PLAT STAFF ASSIGNMENT: ' Eddie Kirk SKETCH PLAN : Received 6-2-86 �_.._.._ Reviewed 6-4-86 PRELIMINARY PLAT : Received 6-26--86 Reviewed 7-2-86 REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT : Received Reviewed go NCDOT : DATE 8-7-86 CERTIFICATION Joe Haynes (Verbal during on-site visit) (Letter NCDOT 8-8-86) SCHOOL BOARD (Orange/Chapel Hi tl-Carrboro) : DATE 7-Z-86 Certification N/A 11TLITIES (OVIASA/Hi l l.sbo rough/Mebane/Orange A Lamance/Ou r-ham) : DATE _6-19-86 Certification Health D_pt.-__- OTHER : Recreation Advisory Council 8-5-86 (Date) Carrboro Fire Department _ ( Date) . Chape L Hill (Date) Carrboro (Date) Hillsborough _ (Date) ' Durham (Date) Other (Date) __ (Date) PLANNING BOARD : Date 8-18-86 Approval X Approval with Conditions Denial r BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS : Date Approval Approval, with Conditions �_� Denial • 154 11115 APPLICATION FOR SU80IVISIOj APPfOVIll CRANGg COUNTY DATE: (1171' SUBDIVISION NAME: T I i)(C°1Y`C t LOCATION: -PI C_Gt 61ref'.,Y' Boat{ OWNER/DEVELOPER:. . A r(--I ()(/ ' I fir- ro 'r s _I . ADDRESS: � ' TELEPHONE NO . : R - -- A • , _ r ,-n 1 ' oti . AGENT/CONTACT: ' .)o AN A1/1 td, (DC^ TELEPHONE NO . : 3'3- 7536 A. SUMMARY INFORMATION: Orange County Tax. Map • /1 Black — Lot(s)/g8va.0 Township /r7 Zoning District(s) : Tota L Number of Acres : .a. 9' Phases: Tote l Number of Lots: , Average Lot Size : '( ic Minimum Lot Size /360tp5 Number/Type of Structures : (existing) i]cne- (proposed) fuse Lineal Feet in Streets: None Acres in Open• Space .�. Water Supply:. /OW/ Pub Lic(specifyl Community ✓ Ind ividuaL • Wastewater Dispose L:• Pub Lic(spool fy) Coiimunity ✓ Individual School District:. • Fire District: General Land Uses in Area: rimae.n.k1 Critical. Areas : stream/drainageways flood prone areas watershed(apecify) historic sites other(explain) B. ALL p Lets must be submitted on sheet no sme L Ler then one inch aqua Ls two— hundred feet (1 "=200' 1 and. no Larger than one inch equals fifty feet (1 "=5D' ) and must contain the fa Clawing information: + subdivision ore's ✓ :'•}.'.'• building setback lines nfas of owner(a) by notation ar typical tot -neck items .-- ti= noes of surveyor, engineer or :cy.'i layout c, ,� N,:i4 t y �+r`� Lend planner existing and proposed ease.. ompleted) y (title] Preliminary plan :j < soots (drainage, ati))tie's, > x- seals north arrow (North et <ti: reeds,. sea.) --- g top of cep) ✓ existing, proposed and . tAx data (including revision dates) wnxa adjoining rights-of-ray township, tax nsp-lock--Lot «:'$ including dimensions and - a0 references wr:,<: street name's end $tat* reed . . boundary described with C.?r::. numbers :;ti•::;., bearings and distances i existing and ,,. �.; �� g proposed total acreage of the tract - eo-et{. utilities, including ...� NM end go of Lots, including ; - type. sizes, Tga end excluding area within I-'ti_'� hydrant', valves and .r rights-of-wey ,: manholes control co /vr?rri;: existing end v '.��• • g proposed. culvert ...iC • proposed Lot Lines with #:= ": including sixes and grease �#,�� dimension■ nWs: • typical street cross-sections `' aii�e3 Lot numbers _:: and Intersection details ya chewing Lines �--� including design and width ._JG _i_c ''ti: topography ae ten foot Li01 �� of ersveleay and shoulder, 4 intarvats /Yc F /Y P •i - water bodies, at - ��•.'.:.'- horizontal cu elite (public and f:xs s flood- ;;��;?.;;{ g L curve data (pub tic Norm ' ` way end ftoodpleine t''tj< roads) mil-: stream buffers end notation Mile_ permanent features such as .;i indicating restricted f, •• buildings. cemeteries, 7':-:' development potential ;:`:::•`-t historic Landmarks, rwia- township, corporate and extra- '� ri: adjoining lot layout territorial planning names of adjoining property MS Jurisdiction lines which Owners and subdivisions , cross the property location end size of parcels dedicated for public use d 3••., in common /VOW-474:f Location and size of Lots of restricted development potential and �t) � notation an plot regarding same +„ii: storaxstar management plan indicating provision for control of the first 1/2 inch of runoff from impervious surfaces (GRAY AREAS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) . 15 . C . OTHER SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: 1 . Twenty—six [28) copies of the preLiminary plat 2. Two fuLL size copies of an Orange County Tax map [one copy with tax parceLs invoLved cLearLy marked) . 3. Where municipal or OWASA sewer is not avaiLabLe, a Letter from the Orange County HeaLth Deportment certifying the proposed wastewater system for each Lot . I , the applicant, hereby certify that the foregoing application is compLete and accurate. I understand that a. $210.00 fee [subdivisions of 15 Lots or Lees) or a $370.00 fee [subdivisions of 15 Lots or more) is due at the time of appLication . A $5.00 per Lot fee is due at the time the final pLat is presented for recordation . (-}lannt /.1)." APPLICANT 'S SIGNATURE 1NER 'S. SIGNATURE DATE DATE T ., ..___ ....�..,.�... FEES: Amount Date Paid Receipt /.236V • I rP ...f.W, 1.1f... • s =a '. 7A SEE 1 MAP 17C \1\ 1 F8 ( MEADOW ESTATES _N`O 7 SEC. � )r t 0I44E7 \E 6.4 f 1 1339 . PINE FOREST l -, Applicant: JO ANNA W. BR34itiI It cAC c.. \,:_\ Zone : A- F : LUP Designation : Agricultural i! 5�1t - Residential i1 - Scale: 111 = 400 11 �0. 0 1 AC ______■:4"-kk 1s • 5482 1 20 2355 I! 3 Ac. jf f m 4 • 29.5 AC. `: , F Tir"---:,40"41r - i 2,-._:f..--- IoFE , 7.36AC. 2tG � 1[ Rr�OO s _3723 ° 4 NF 3.03 s 47 11 Ti .70AC so _AC. ' 3.52AC- - 1.93PC ii 10�% A0_ A 21G AC- 2113 i/ s 1 X67 h coo 9355 - 2 30i3C" � 1.524 440 s d Sg .�01 ii 'AC. 3.59A C. 21A ',� :f 1.668175 aw /q. aAC.5 -4104 / ' 4.29 AC 2 73AC //o� 1.64"J . o // `� .3Z -981 • e ' ,/� 1.49 zee b @ - AC.f 2.2 3 4C'��HARRY WALK OAD Lek i; +1 s5t5 /7 1- �� 2.56AC. A) // • � �/ i 7260 / -- - ------.--...~_ le! / t x`112.+ AC. `---` — 11 - d„aSTA]Fa 15r _ �. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Graham, NC 2725.3-0766 JAMES G. MARTIN GOVERNOR August 8, 1986 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS JAMES E. HARRINGTON SECRETARY Orange County Mr. Eddie Kirk Orange County Planning Department 106 East Margaret Lane - Hillsborough, NC 27278 Subject: Pine Forest Subdivision Off SR 1567, Pleasant. Green Road Dear Mr. Kirk: The sight distance is adequate for the above develop- ment and no driveway permit will be required. If there are any questions, please advise. Yours very truly, . M. Mills L,,/IUSTRICT ENGINEER • JMM/JBH:jbh . • An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer • • ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT HILLSBOROUGH i C • NORTH CAROLINA 15 27278 • •FFt MEMORANDUM TO: Eddie Kirk, Planner FROM: Warren Faircloth, Erosion Control Officer SUBJECT: Stormwater Management Plan for Pine Forest Subdivision DATE: August 7, 1986 The plan for this subdivision proposes to use the undisturbed buffer surrounding the lots as filtering and infiltration areas. The plan meets the Ordinance requirements. �1i1J' 4 ..irfr Warren Faircloth r�l`s "''''�` ? O atnge (;uuntg lam-ration J tlii Va;' s ?_:rwr;F;teirt k : x a� `: 300 West Tryon Streei w = ` ^ter+ �-. a .? 15 HILLS6CROUGN., �'JC. 27273 ;_: y'-['c'-r., . Director MF.,MORANDUM a /---. TO: Eddie Kirk, Plannner FROM: Mary Anne Black • • DATE: August 5, 1986 0 RE: Courtesy Review —.Moreland Subdivision - Sunset Ridge Subdivisions - _ Pine Forest Subdivision - • Upon review of the preliminary plans for the proposed Moreland and Sunset Ridge Subdivisions, I find only one element vaTranting comet. _ - from a recreation and parks perspective, namely the subject properties°- - - proximity to the large recreation area at Lake Michael, owned by the _ _ _ Town of Mebane and developed partially with Orange County monies. • . The open-space needs of the residents of these subdivisions could. be . easily served by the area at Lake Michael. In that the Pine Forest Subdivision does not appear to be a "major" subdivision, I will not provide comment. Contact me if comments are needed, however. _ - MAB/pbl : • Hillsboroug h 732-9361 • Durham, 688-7333 • Chapei Hig. 963.4501 rig1ebane. 22T-2,03a Area Code 919 • 4.4 :�• mow•,•,:••••,. ' wwsnvrcwevr sM!'.v:.esaex'riOnawxI!wrITMmZASsIMIT/WAtrerls 'r5$9:. t t�:Sk:'�'!C6 ZiaZa 1cC. c. Pine Forest -- Preliminary Presentation by Collins. This agenda item is to consider approval of the Prelminary Plan for Pine Forest Subdivision. The property. in question is located in Eno T'c- ;r,sh i.o on SR 1567 (Pleasant Green Road) . It is refercnccd as part of lot 198 on Tax Map 17 . There are f_wo lots proposed out of an 85 acre tract. One lot is proposed to be 1.6 acres and the other lot 1.55 acres. The area is designated Agricultural Residential in the Land Use Plan. The property is zoned Agricultural Residential (.el- R) with both lots having state road frontage. F:i'_0. protection will be provided by the Eno Rural Fire District. Development of two lots in this area will add Eqn • additional 19 trips per day to P] easa t Green 1:oa'J. In 19851 the most recent traffic count, there were 1 300 trips per day on Pleasant Green Road. The property is relatively level without streams and presently wooded. • NCI-JOT responded positively and no driveway permit is required. Planning Staff recommends approval . t. r. l3y pu.rmose O! .j''e cra.ve�. !d 7_=..`. ... behind the lot _ Le e,zp es.`i:ed l.iie (,:O is .-1:n that- Lo 2 could access o;iL:':, the gravel dr.i ✓:: ;..:ay rather thm Pleasant Green Road. Collins re>`ponded that it not . necessary for a two lot subdivision and tb .t usually is addressed when more lots are being proposed for a subdivision. MOTION: Shanklin moved approval. Seconded by Yuhasz. Best again expressed his concern that it would be better for these two lots to access onto the gravel road. O R A N G E C O U N T Y BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ib l ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date Septjnk..r 22_286 Act lon nda Item LJv SUBJECT: Red Hill Estate - Preliminary DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes X __.. No • Attachment( s) µ�_ Information Contact: Eddie Kirk Checklist Vicinity Map Preliminary Plan Agency Letters �_~- Telephone Numbers � Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 PURPOSE : To consider approval of the Preliminary Plan for Red Hilt Estate subdivision . NEED: The property in question is located in Little River Township along the south side of Bill Poole Road (SR 1536) and Hopkins Road ( SR 1537 ) at the intersection . It is referenced as part of lot 5 on Tax Map 13 . All lots are proposed to have state road frontage. The tract is bordered by residential and un- developed wooded land . There are eight (8) lots proposed out of 14.82 acres with an average lot size of 1 .85 acres excluding the right-of-way. Little River Township is not zoned and the property is located in an area designated Agricultural Residential in the Land Use Plan . IMPACT: A 1985 traffic count on SR 1536 ( Bill Poole Road) indicated 90 trips per day just east of SR 1538 (New Sharon Church Road ) and 30 trips per day just west of the Durham County line. An additional 76 trips per day would be generated by this sub- division . There are two minor streams flowing through the property which required 30 foot drainage easements. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Board recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1 . That the property lines stop on the right-of-way lines for Bill Poole Road and Hopkins Road (See NCDOT comment) . 2. That any power line easements be shown . PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT ( INK ONLY) 11/85 162 APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL RANGE COUNTY DATE: 4-25-86 SUBDIVISION NAME: Red H i l l Estate LOCATION: Bill Poole Road & Hopkins, Road, Little River Township OWNER/DEVELOPER: Julius Verwoerdt (Brad Walker) ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO . : AGENT/CONTACT: Steve Yuhasz _ TELEPHONE NO . : 732-6262 ENT Land Surveys. Inc. A. SUMMARY INFORMATION: Orange County Tax Map 13 Block Lot (s) P/05 Township 1 Zoning District(s) : Tote L Number of Acres : 16. 47 Phases: 1 Total Number of Lots: 8 Average Lot Size: 2.06 Minimum Lot Size 1.47 Number/Type of Structures.: (existing) none (proposed) Single TIm Ty Lineal Feet in Streets : Acres in Open Space Water Supply: Public(specify) Community x Individual Wastewater Disposal : Public(specify) Community x Individual School District:. Orange Fire District : General Land Uses in Area : Agricultural/Residential Critical Areas : x stream/drainageweys flood prone areas wetershed(specify) historic sites other( axpLain) B . ALL plats must be submitted on sheet no smaller than one inch equals two— hundred feet (1 "=2OD t ) and no Larger than one inch equals fifty feat (1 "=B0 ' ) and must contain the following information : X subdivision name X MA �; building setback lines - 2� nose of owner(el by notation or typical Lot check items X .,4"e'; name of surveyor, engineer or :A:::_3 layout M q land planner X •C: existin and proposed aceq- completed) ,R,_, 44 (title] Preliminary Plan " ` sants (d p rainage, utilities. >;.'• smile, north arrow (North at M roads, etc.) x ` , top of aspl X :X:µ: existing, proposed and dote (including revision dates) = adjoining rights-of-way X township, tax asp-block-lot ---: including dimensions and ryf+'": references ;':':-.;-: street nesee end state road 4 boundary described with ' numbers { beat ings and distances X ''' X '...a.< total acreage of the treat utilities end proposed •'-j•'' . including MI; and acreage of Lots, including : type, sizes, end excluding area within - - hydrants, valves and L.•. 4 rights-of- X •:;�y g y X ••"••••" oenho Les control corner } esistin end p 9 proposed culvert X proposed Lot lines with -, :: including sizes end grades g0::: dimensions .jX `:` X Lot numbers 4W, typical street cross-sections X �; ::; and intersection details -4- phasing lines i;?.>: : including design and width �,.. ,4-, topography at ten foot (10) "' of travetwey and shoulders intervals X �,,i ' , horizontal alignment and 4 water bodies, streams, flood- - - general curve chats (public :::§.:0::: way and floodp lain. - '':': roads) X :-`•,,,,,,.: stream buffers and notation •`•••• permanent features such as 05::i+; ' indicating restricted davito rent :_. ; buildings, cemeteries, X ti. .. p potential :::,0: historic landmarks. +i.me township, corporate and extra- X adjoining lot layout ;;;jr territorial planning names of adjoining property h jurisdiction lines which owners and subdivisions '•`c{ cross the property X "' '' Location and size of «».e parcels dedicated for public use or reserved XC •41in common Location end size of lots of restricted development''�'-:. P potential end ••:•-: notation on plat regarding ears z,iit storawatar •enegewent plan indicating provision for control of the first 1/2 inch of runoff ?roe iwpervioue surfaces (r'DAV Ant_AO rim nor,rr ''i-r• ....v ..% 16 - C. OTHER SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS : 1 . Twenty—six (283 copies of the preliminary plat 2. Two full size copies of an Orange County Tax map (one copy with tax parcels involved clearly marked] . 3. Where municipal or OWASA sewer is not available, a Letter from the Orange County Health Department certifying the proposed wastewater system for each Lot . I , the applicant , hereby certify that the foregoing application is complete and accurate. I understand that a $210.00 fee ( subdivisions of 15 Lots or less) or a $370 .00 fee (subdivisions of 16 Lots or more] is due at the time of application . A $5.00 per lot fee is due at the time the final plat is presented for recordation . Steve Yuhasz _ Brae! Walker APPLICANT '5 SIGNATURE OWNER 'S SIGNATURE 4-25-86 4-26-°6 DATE DATE FEES: Amount $210.00 Date Paid 5-5-86 Receipt 11567 • 16 CRANGc C CERTIFICATION A!CAPPRCVALS •- PSF!_ttiI !ARY- STAFF ASSIGNMENT : •__Ed_ die Kirk SKETCh PLAN; Received 4-15-86 nevi ev,ed 4-i6-86 PRELI:1Ii:ARY PLAT Received 4-25-86 ' Rev awed 5-7--86 REVI•ZED PRELIMINARY PLAT : Received Reviev,ed NCDOT: . DATE _5_-_-1c1-86. CERTIFICATION recommendation • SCHOOL BOARD (Orange/CliapeL Hi 1L-Carrboro ) : DATE 51-5-8.6 Cerui fication comment UTLITI ES (OWASA/Hi L Lsbo rough/Mebane/Orange A Laurance/Durham) DATE Co,-ti fi cat iova .d .alth_Depj OTHER : Fe::reation Advisor; Counci L ..(rat. ) Carrboro Fire Department (Date) Chape 1 Hi L L __ ----(rate) Carrboro __.__ _ ([]ate) Hi 1 Lsbo rough (Date) Durham (Date) Other Erosion Control 6-3-'16(Date - ��,.. (rate) PLANNING BOARD : Date 8-18-86 App rove L X Approve l with Conditions Denial BOARD CP COMMISSIONERS : Date Approve L Approval with Conditions _ Denia! • ...__.__::3.._---�• •wn..1 r.nr any -r�•n -rrr rr-r-r -aw.r---.n.c-r�------ . b96i 45-/ i r- �/ il/ /, // 16` RED HILL ESTATE �q OWNER: Julius Verwoerdt /II LUP Designation: A-R Agricultural /' Residential . 7 Scale: 1 " = 400 ' - / 0 r // ?/ 9734 I /�, 146.3 AC 1 // -. 1 ,.......--> \ fir A � _ ` TUgRE -ra _+f�� \ CEMEtERY ----- \\ 4 �%' ��\ 2081 ! it II f /11", _______________ ±.1. i . l � 1 t f I i � 3 f s K--' f 7 13°.7 3 1.! 3175h4f � j CL 'SHAW PS-/4 I 1 FpRX �r(� 1 I 1 - i f I VII i / I J 1 16 t. ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT HILLSBOROUGH NORTH CAROLINA 27278 + LI . . Ir 1.. MEMORANDUM TO: Eddie Kirk, Planner !' 1 FROM: Warren Faircloth, Erosion Control Officer SUBJECT: Red Hill Estates Stormwater Management Plan DATE: June 3, 1986 The plan for this subdivision proposes to meet the Ordinance requirements through the use of detention ponds to control the peak rate of runoff to a rate no greater than the pre-- development rate. If implemented as designed, the plan would control the peak rate of runoff to a rate no greater than the pre -development rate. • • 16� • ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT I ILLSBOROUGH NORTH CAROLINA S • • 27278 • 6,°'„ ,1 4 lit • May 19, 1986 Joe Hanes . N.C. Department of Transportation • Rt. 3, Box 3 Hillsborough, NC 27278 Re: Red Hill Estate Dear Joe: Please review the attached major subdivisions. If there are any questions, please contact me at the Planning Department. Sincerely, . 646_;.1(A4 Eddie Kirk Eddie, We recommend that the property lines stop on right—of—way line for Bill Poole Road and Hopkins Road. No driveway permit is required. • Sincerely, 916.' 0:44pe•.0e4) • Joe B. Haynes Highway Maintenance Engineer 5/21/86 . `.C.01-74‘ _ C range �ountg ?Recreation anb arks Etevartrent 300 West Tryon trees " • HILLSBOROUGH. N.C. 27278 •1_lie. ?I�i�_ May ,.... .. Back, Director PM Jm • TO: Eddie Kirk, Planner FROM: Mary Anne Black' DATE: June 3, 1986 RE: Waxstaff Park and Red Hill Estates Upon review of the preliminary plans for the proposed WIxstaff Park and Red Hill estates, I see no elements warranting comment from a recreation and park perspective. CC: Lorraine Parker, Chairperson - Orange County Recreation and Parks Advisory Council • • • Hillsborough, 732-9361 • Durham, 688-7333 • Chapel Hill, 968-4501 • Mebane, 227-2032 Area Code 919 e. -'?"F'`.'j�:•ntation ray Cca r�'i;.-. • 77 6. �k rr. This agenda item is to consider approval of the Preliminary Plan for Red Hill Estate Subdivis?.on. • The property in question is located in Little River Township along the south side of Bill Poole Road (SR 1536) and Hopkins Road (SR 1537) at the intersection. It is referenced as part of Lot 5 on Tax Map 13. All lots are proposed to have state road frontage. The tract is bordered by residen-- t i.al and undeveloped wooded land. There are eight (8) lots proposed out of 14.82 acres with an average lot size of 1.85 acres excluding the right-of-way. Little River Township' is not zoned and the property is located in an area designated Agricultural Residential in the Land Use Plan. A 1985 traffic count on SR 1536 (Bill Poole Road) indicated 90 trips per- day just east of SR 1538 (New Sharon Church Road) and 30 trips per day just • west of the Durham County Line. An additional 76 trips per day would be generated by this subdivi- sion. There are two minor streams flowing throughl the props-i::ty which require 30 foot drainage easements. Planning Staff recommended approval subject to the condition that the property lines stop on the right-of-way lines for Bill Poole Road and Hoplrins Road per recommendation from NCDOT. Best inquired the location of the power line easement. Yuhasz responded he did not know. C:Cl approval _ '.1. the L-° '.'CA':ilc'LGic'a by staff and the ci) ,<ii_tion that any owe line easements be shown on the plat. Seconded by Shanklin. Jacobs indicated he would like to have more detailed statements from Warren Fairclothr S & E Of. i_cerr concerning stoLmwater management plans. . VOTE: 7 in favor. 1 abstained (Yuhasz -- due to professional conflict of interest) . 17C ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agenda Item No. f I I ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION ON ANIMAL SHELTER CONTRACT DEPARTMENT: COUNTY MANAGER PUBLIC HEARING: Yes X No ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: MANAGER'S OFFICE,X501 YES TELEPHONE NUMBER: Hillsborough - 732-8181 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 Mebane - 227-2031 Durham - 688-7331 PURPOSE: To consider extending the contract periods for the animal shelter renovation. Holt Construction Company ACME Heating and Plumbing Watson Electric Company NEED: The present contracts would normally expire on September 12, 1986. However, in order to complete the project 36 additional days are needed due to delays in the production and delivery of split block and electric floor mats. These delays were beyond the control of the contractors. IMPACT: There is no financial impact in this time extension. RECOMMENDATION(S) : Approve change order to move the completion date to October 17, 1986. �to�t Cono&izction Corripanv nc. • - • GENERAL CONTRACTORS • • - craham, C 919/226-3718 27253 August 22, 1986 Dail Dixon and Associates Suite 220A, Carr Mill Carrboro, North Carolina 27510 Attention: Mr. Michael Hubbard Subject: Orange County Animal Shelter . Chapel Hill, North Carolina Dear Sir: Per our letter of June 27, 1986, we officially request that our contract finishing date be extended to October 17, 1986. This new finishing date adds 36 of the 72 days of lapse time, (due to circumstances beyond our control) to the construction schedule. Your consideration of the above will be greatly appreciated. Poseph Holt JH:gb 17 ott Co ian ( nwanu, nt. : • . • GENERAL CONTRACTORS • • A1IEi6 Gr /Jn aham, f C. 919/226-3718 27253 June 27, 1986 Dail Dixon & Associates Suite 220A, Carr Mill Carrboro, North Carolina 27510 Attention: Mr. Michael Hubbard Subject: Orange County Animal Shelter Chapel Hill, North Carolina Dear Sir: The delivery of the split block for subject job has been set for July 10, 1986. We plan to complete the masonry on this project by July 18, 1986. . This six weeks delay on the split block, plus the three weeks delay on the concrete floor heat watts by the Electrical Con- tractor has caused a nine weeks lapse in our construction schedule• I have optimistically accelerated and revise our schedule accordingly to accomodate the set finishing date, which should be e>:toridded to the nine weeks of delays beyond our control. Trust you will find the above satisfactory. Sincerely, r seph Holt JH/gb 174 - • oftanotruecton, Compaii , in . r� • GENERAL CONTRACTORS graham, n C 919/226-3718 27253 June 12, 1986 Dail Dixon & Associates _ Suite 220A, Carr Mill C'arrboro, North Carolina 27510 Attention: Mr. Michael Hubbard Subject: Orange County Animal Shelter Chapel Hill, North Carolina Dear Sir: I Please be advised that the construction on the above project . stopped on June 10, 1986 and will be delayed for approximately three (3) weeks due to the production schedule for. the split blocks masonry units. The manufacturer, Adams Concrete Products, says these units will be delivered approximately July 1, 1986. If there are any questions, please advise.‘ ------- . Sincerely, 1 i oseph Holt JH:gb FOR �` AND RESIDENTIAL--COMMERCIAL %: 74 • INSTALLATION .a'-.:" MAINTENANCE INDUSTRIAL—INSTITUTIONAL WATSON( ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION CO. 1000 Ward Boulevard S.W.,Wilson, North Carolina 27893-0647 P.O.BOX 64427 FAYETTEVILLE,N.C. May 02, 1986 23306.0427 DIAL_:(919) 483-4193 Holt Construction Co. P.O.BOX 1250 P. O. Drawer 118 GREENVILLE,N.C. Graham, NC 27253 27834.0270 DIAL: (919) 756-4550 Attn: Mr. Joe Holt Re: Animal. Shelter Expansion Our Job NO. 62144 P_0.BOX 2116 BURLINGTON,N.C. Mr. Holt: 2721:.-2116 DIAL: (919) 226-4441 This letter is to inform you of delays we have encountered with the heat mats that go in the slab below the dog cages. The heat mats have not been approved to date, and I have been P.O.BOX 1706_ informed by my supplier that it will take at least three (3) RALEIGH,N.C. weeks for delivery of the mats after approval. I will let 27619-7063 you know when the mats are approved and a scheduled shipping DIAL:(919) 7814651 date as soon as possible. Electrically yours, P.O.BOX 3105 WATSON ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION CO_ VILSON,N,C. -,gqa-n ,t-r (01.1 1 237-7511 Mr. Scott Myers Burlington Div. Office Mgr. ' P.O.BOX 2365 • ROCKY MOUNT,N.C. SM.sw. 27801-0440 MAY 5 1985 DIAL:(919) 442-7102 CC Jolt Constru. kvn Co. Job IFile P.O.BOX 449 WILMINGTON,N.C. 28402-0449 DIAL:(919) 762.1834 0_BOX 12038 O,:-SA■. M C. : 203; L: (9"3' . :.6.se,-) . CHANGE - 17 c Dail Dixon and Associates Distribution to: On R •� OWNER ❑ • Suite 220A Carr Mill ARCHITECT 0 Carrboro, N.C. 27510 AIA DOCUMENT G701 CONTRACTOR t_J 919-968-8333 FIELD [J OTHER ❑ PROJECT: Orange County Animal Shelter CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 1 (name, address) Expansion, Chapel Hill, N.C. TO (Contractor): INITIATION DATE: 8-28-86 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 85-101 Watson Electrical Construction P.O. Box 3105 CONTRACT FOR: Orange County Animal . Wilson, N.C. 27895 Shelter Expansion CONTRACT DATE:2-18-86 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: Contract substantial completion date shall be extended from September 12, 1986 to October 17, 1986 per Holt Construction Co. proposal for extention. Not valid until signed by hods the Owner and Architect. Signature of the Contractor indicates his agreement herewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or Contract Time. The original (Contract Sum) t -4' .NF t 12MODXt0bX) was $ 9,370.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders $ .00 The (Contract Sum) (al,NNIK-IVK.MaiNiViiKaiiK prior to this Change Order was $ 9,370.00 • The (Contract Sum) NiXiXiN.NAXIXxXrXiXa will be r t )X(r r eg)Nunchanged) by this Change Order $ .00 The.new (Contract Sum) (NtXMaiM Nt xY+'r)ttXXXKincluding this Change Order will be $ • 9,370.00 The Contract Time will be (increased) (d%L'riTaieil)NtyilillitYglfaby ( 35 ) Days- . The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is October 17, 1986 Authorized: Dail Dixon and Associates Watson Electrical Const. Co. Orange County ARCHITECT S»7t .220A Carr Mill_ 'OUT.R ToCx R 3105 10O E . Margaret Lane Address Address Address Carrboro, N.C. 275:10-_.. T Wilson, N. C.--27895 Hillsborough. N. C. • LAH CHANGE Distribution to: Dail Dixon and Associates 17t ORDER OWNER ❑ Suite 220A Carr Mill AIA DOCUMENT G701 ARCHITECT ❑ Carrboro, N. C. 27510 CONTRACTOR Cl 919-968-8333 FIELD ❑ OTHER ❑ PROJECT: Orange County Animal Shelter CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 3 (name, address) Expansion , Chapel Hill, N.C. INITIATION DATE: 8-28-86 TO (Contractor): 1 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 85-101 Holt Construction Co. Inc. P.O. Drawer 118 CONTRACT FOR: Orange County Animal Graham, N.C. 27253 Shelter Expansion J CONTRACT DATE: 3-17-86 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: Contract substantial completion date shall be extended from September 12, 1986 to October 17, 1986 per letter from Holt Construction Co. Inc. dated August 22, 1986 indicating delays due to the split block delivery time which was beyond the control of the contractor. Not valid until signed by both the Owner and Architect. Signature of the Contractor indicates his agreement herewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or Contract Time. The original (Contract Sum) (N1XiXtX€NIM airXXN ,vas $ 56,460.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders $ 438.70 The (Contract Sum) (1 IXINK*Xlit�1,0LX prior to this Change Order was $ 56,898.70 The (Contract Sum) 1 IXIIiffe l >Nr i X) will be Kri€rMMl(( ria (unchanged) by this Change Order $ .00 The new (Contract Sum) (Xximxtp;;e X1/00 )CksX including this Change Order will he $ 56,898.70 The Contract Time will he (increased) (ItXrXNEXWICtICO.frX=X41 by ( 35 ) Days. The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is October 17, 1986 Authorized: Dail D .elates Holt Construction Co. Inc. Orange County ARCHITECT ?N.TRA 'l OI: WNF' Suite 220A Carr Mill — �.�. Drawer 118 ?( �. Margaret Lane Addre c Address Address N. C. 27510 Graham, N. C. 2725.E ....... ......--- ... --- ---- - • hlil.lboroug')? N- cw...--- --t S �-- - .n . , • Ch ANGE Distribution to: Dail Dixon and Associates ORDER - OWNER ❑ Suite 220A Carr Mill ARCHITECT ❑ Carrboro, N.C. 27510 AM DOCUMENT 6707 CONTRACTOR CI 919-968-8333 FIELD ❑ OTHER ❑ PROJECT: Orange County Animal Shelter CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 2 (name, address) Expansion, Chapel Hill, N.C. INITIATION DATE: 8-28-86 TO (Contractor): C(71 In PROJECT NO: 85-101 Acme Plumbing and Heating Co. 1In P.O. Box 2288 �ONTRACT FOR: Orange County Animal Durham, N. C. 27702 Shelter Expansion J CONTRACT DATE: 2--18-56 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: Contract substantial completion date shall be extended from September 12, 1986 to October 17, 1986 per Holt Construction Co. Proposal for extension. Not valid until signed by both the Owner and Architect. Signature of the Contractor indicates his agreement herewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or Contract Time The original (Contract Sum) (XXIXiXtKHX1XxXXuXXXFX was $ 9,950.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders $ 90.00 The (Contract Sum) (CXt r t►KXc)?kWaNNt tKprior to this Change Order was $ 10,040.00 The (Contract Sum) (O Yr XcXiXajkilftl X r Kwiil be (i aidiNX t - I(N (unchanged) by this Change Order $ .00 The new (Contract Sum) (CgftXrXnVX&VOINNKrXc ,XtNtncluding this Change Order will be $ 10,040.00 The Contract Time will be (increased) NRI' atNiE1 by ( 35 ) Days. The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is October 17, 1986 Authorized: Dail Dixon and Associates Acme Plumbing & Heating Co. Orange County RC nciVe TE F20A Carr Mill rP� �A�o 2288 °IVERE. Margaret Lane Address Address Address b ti N. C. 2751.0 ----, --... --- 0 lsborough, N. C . Ca.rr,�Urc�z--- -- -- .----- --- Durham, N. C. 27702 I•hl --- r_ 176 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action A e nda Item No. ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 SUBJECT: CHANGE ORDER TO HOLT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR ANIMAL SHELTER DEPARTMENT: COUNTY MANAGER PUBLIC HEARING: Yes X No ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: MANAGER'S OFFICE,X501 YES TELEPHONE NUMBER: Hillsborough - 732-8181 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 Mebane - 227-2031 Durham - 688-7331 PURPOSE: To consider a change order to permit installation of a new cabinet top on an existing cabinet which is to be relocated. NEED: The existing counter top is deteriorated from water damage over years of use. Portions of wood together with new formica should be installed. IMPACT: The cost of this top replacement is $167. 00. Funds are avail- able within the project budget. RECOMMENDATION(S) : Approve change order. • TT 17 CHANGE Distribution to: DAIL DIXON & ASSOCIATES ORDER OWNER ❑ SUITE 220A CARR MILL • ARCHITECT ❑ CARRBORO, NC 27510 AMA DOCUMENT G701 CONTRACTOR ❑ (919) 968-8333 FIELD ❑ OTHER ❑ PROJECT: Orange County Animal Shelter CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 2 (name, address) Expansion INITIATION DATE: 5/25/86 TO (Contractor): ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 85/101 Holt Construction Co. CONTRACT FOR: Orange County Animal PO Drawer 118 Shelter Expansion Graham, NC 27253 CONTRACT DATE: 3/17/86 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: Replace existing- Formica cabinet top in existing kitchen to match new counter top per your letter dated August 22, 1986, including 10% overhead and profit. Nut \.,lid until signed by both the Owner and Architect, Signature of the Contractor indicates his agreement herewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or Contract Time, The original (Contract Sum) (Crxttortgstmarc was $ 56,460.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders $ 271.70 The (Contract Sum) (iaixixocatifdflx1Xmxxx3Sacsi4 prior to this Change Order was $ 56,731.70 • The (Contract Sum) (Z�aMtdxgrxXXpr) will be (increased) i � a by this Change Order $ 167.00 • The new (Contract Sum) (k4sstrxki including this Change Order will be $ 56,898.70 The Contract Time will be (Mztem Nr i c(unchanged) by ( 0 ) Days. The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is September 12, 1986. Authorized: Dail Dixon & Associates Holt Construction Co. Orange County CO P1 A TOR A: uit :T 220A Carr Mill rawer 118 oW N1W 6 E. Margaret Lane Address Address Address • C`arrlioro, NC 27510 Graham, NC or.oug 27253 Hillsb NC —` 1 i �_ � 27273 DAIL I • f- . _.... .. .. __won anjtruction Corn an .�'`nc. 18 L' I t1 • • • GENERAL CONTRACTORS - • • 919/226 3718 grate C // 27253 August 22, 1986 F Dail Dixon & Associates Suite 220 A, Carr Mill Carrboro, North Carolina 27510 Attention: Mr. Michael Hubbard Subject: Orange County Animal Shelter Chapel Hill, North Carolina Dear Sir: Please find enclosed our change order No. 4 for replacing existing formica cabinet top in the amount of one hundred sixty-seven dollars ($167.00) . Trust you will find the above satisfactory. Respectfully, Ciboept Holt JH:gb 181 t„ .. . . . . . . . . .. . 130 3- ' - 2I • at erz.A06E, Co(' upi -Aw , mit. L . cAra- L g 3 r24 eEpLAcE Ex Is. ps 4 Foam;cA 6413IVET Trap +6iir L.vrvve)siL -Ca , CFo,uii * Top) 8 Opel C P Sr CO . ( LA-6 02 �v 6.661 ate, I T , I u a Su -JCL rZo4Yo 4p.LA 6a0 2,o� I 5-1 sec I a d C.J4- P/2.6 p•T I 6 7,peel PLu 81116. yo, o i fi 18' ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agenda Item No. F''3 ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 SUBJECT: CHANGE ORDER FOR ACME PLUMBING AND HEATING FOR ANIMAL SHELTER DEPARTMENT: COUNTY MANAGER PUBLIC HEARING: Yes X No ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: MANAGER'S OFFICE,X501 YES TELEPHONE NUMBER: Hillsborough - 732-8181 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 Mebane - 227-2031 Durham - 688-7331 PURPOSE: To consider a related change order for removal and reinstalla- tion of a kitchen sink in connection with the formica replace- ment. NEED: A separate change order has to be approved in order to cover the plumbing portion of the work. IMPACT: The cost of the sink removal and reinstallation is $90. 00. Funds are available within the project budget. RECOMMENDATION(S) : Approve change order. CHANGE Distribution to: . Lail Dixon and Associates ORDER 18 OWNER ❑ Suite -220A, Carr Mill 18 ei ARCHITECT ❑ Carrboro, N.C. 27510 A/A DOCUMENT G701 CONTRACTOR ❑ 910-968--8333 FIELD ❑ OTHER [I • PROJECT: Orange County Animal Shelter CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 1 (name, address) Expansion, Chapel Hill, N.C. INITIATION DATE: 8 - 26 - 86 TO (Contractor): ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 85-101 Acme Plumbing & Heating Co. Inc. CONTRACT FOR:Orange County Animal P.O. Box 2288 y Durham, N.C. 27702 Shelter Expansion CONTRACT DATE: 2 --- 18 - 86 • You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: Remove the existing sink from the existing kitchen countertop and reinstall the same sink into the new countertop (by the General Contractor, See Holt Construction Co. Change Order No. 2) as per Acme Plumbing and Heating Co. Incas letter dated 8-26-86. • Not valid until signed by both the Owner and Architect_ Signature of the Contractor indicates his agreement herewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or Contract Time. The original (Contract Sum) (4tcNNO I IXDI X5l was $ 9,950.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders $ .00 The (Contract Sum) ( iKANMARrIsCI-X�3XCX)X) prior to this Change Order was $ 9,950.00 The (Contract Sum) (cXaXiXtx )' rxif i iX) will be (increased) (cl s r?b t XGt ii)fri) by this Change Order $ 90.00 _ The new (Contract Sum) ( xtxt i x>kiNiEt including this Change Order will be $ 10,040.00 The Contract Time will be (KINNXItXdON?IN• 4 (unchanged) by ( 0 ) Days. The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is September 12, 1986. Authorized: fail_Dixon and Associates Acme Plumbing & Heating Co. Orange County ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR Suite___22�g, Carr Mill P.O. Box 2288 Inc- 1%11Y. Margaret Lane Address Address Address Carrboro, N. 0 27510 Durham, N. C. 27702 Hillsborourt. N. C. 27278 MMEMMEMMEMEMEr 4 184 yes _ 577,4/r4 . 0-1/r. 1,7001747g 5 T/A) r fir 1. 130 C_44 Kw-fere. j - ;... I�I ' c 7. MANGE Distribution to: Dail Dixon and Associates 1 t ORDER OWNER ❑ Suite 220A Carr Mill MA DOCUMENT G701 ARCHITECT ❑ Carrboro, N.C. 27510 CONTRACTOR ❑ 919-968-8333 • FIELD ❑ OTHER ❑ PROJECT: Orange County Animal Shelter CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 2 (name, address) Expansion, Chapel Hill, N.C. TO (Contractor): INITIATION DATE: 8-28-86 `� ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 85-101 Acme Plumbing and Heating Co. 1n P.O. Box 2288 cCONTRACT FOR: Orange County Animal Durham, N.C. 27702 Shelter Expansion L J CONTRACT DATE: 2-18-86 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: Contract substantial completion date shall be extended from September 12, 1986 to October 17, 1986 per. Holt Construction Co. Proposal for extension. • Not valid until signed by both the Owner and Architect. Signature of the Contractor indicates his agreement herewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or Contract Time. The original (Contract Sum) (EaCaKNffeXXAXKYRKJOU14 was $ 9,950.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders $ 90.00 The (Contract Sum) ( r nl'ekiNtsreaNiklaatNprior to this Change Order was $ 10,040.00 • The (Contract Sum) (OXriikWcKAil iXi t will be (t' i s ai XX (unchanged) by this Change Order $ .00 The new (Contract Sum) ( 1XrN X441rAXIICINcxNncluding this Change Order will be $ 10,040.00 The Contract Time will be (increased) �0 NRIX I� by The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is October 17, 1986 ( 35 ) Days Dail Dixon and Associates Authorized: ARCHITE Acme Plumbing & Heating Co. Orange County uite1LOA Carr Mill RA oR E - �- �ox 2288 TN ERE Margaret Lane Address Address • Carrboro, N.C. 27510 D z� Adill- _7702 Hill�•orou•h N.C. BY 1 B; .`IIrJ , //� DATE Z8 4140 8C� DATE 1 . DATE w AIA DOCUMENT G701 • CHANGE ORDER • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIA® • © 1978 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS,1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W.,WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 G701—1978 ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 108 East MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGH, N. C. 27278 MOe$a CARSY =imam NORMAN WALKER DON W1LLHOIT i 9 September 22, 1986 Mr. W. Tilley Acme Plumbing & Heating Co. P.O. Box 2288 Durham, NC 27702 Dear Mr. Tilley: Thank you very much for a urning the c, h je order with the required s atures. - ti I have ret an or; fnaf°- for � es and have .�, �,ate... �,.�: returned a copy �to,,ya for�•r our- -ormatiorr '.. `°''• If you have=` any;' questions, please dow'L:not-.. hesitate to contact Assistant::County Manager Bill Laws Thank you. .._ Sincerely,. Mrs. Beverly A. Blythe Clerk /bab File Attachment CHANGE Distribution to: Dail Dixon and Associates ORDER OWNER ❑ Suite 220A Carr Mill ARCHITECT ❑ Carrboro, N.C. 27510 MA DOCUMENT G701 CONTRACTOR ❑ 919-968-8333 FIELD ❑ OTHER ❑ PROJECT: Orange County Animal Shelter CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 3 (name, address) Expansion , Chapel Hill, N.C. INITIATION DATE: 8-28-86 TO (Contractor): ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 85-101 Holt Construction Co. Inc. P.O. Drawer 118 CONTRACT FOR: Orange County Animal Graham, N.C. 27253 Shelter Expansion L J CONTRACT DATE: 3-17-86 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract:. Contract substantial completion date shall be extended from September 12, 1986 to October 17, 1986 per letter from Holt Construction Co. Inc. dated August 22, 1986 indicating delays due to the split block delivery time which was beyond the control of the contractor. • Not valid until signed by both the Owner and Architect. Signature of the Contractor indicates his agreement herewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or Contract Time. The original (Contract Sum) ((XiI$aid(dialMa kiXrX t(was $ 56,460.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders $ 438.70 The (Contract Sum) (NOrilitEtiMiXIXhirXiCCKsX prior to this Change Order was $ 56,898.70 The (Contract Sum) (KKaXiXt Uilfaulii)UX will be KG Fail£iiiilKa.aarigiatilKunchanged) by this Change Order $ .00 The new (Contract Sum) ( 1$l-elg'IfixarvmcxsX including this Change Order will be $ 56,898.70 The Contract Time will be (increased) ( ICIXaXEMN(KrXlX$ cX by ( 35 ) Days. The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is October 17, 1986 . Authorized: Dail Dixon and Aslsociates Holt Construction Co. Inc. _ Oran unt a Co ARCHITECT ON.TRA TOR OWN Suite 220A Carr Mill ',U. rawer 118 lu6 . Margaret Lane Address Address Address • Carrboro, N.C. 27510 Graha , N.C. 2725 Hills• .rougi , N.C.t BY BY / c/t ^L^�`r . + BY r A ///1 — DATE / „ 4(D SCo DATE 9 B I 3J DATE pi,.. :,iy Ll'b r AIA DOCUMENT G701 • CHANGE ORDER • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIA® • O 1978 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W.,WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 G701 —1978 ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 106 EAST MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGH, N. C. 27278 MOSRS CARET HEN LLOYD BIEIIRLEY E.MARSHAL L NORMAN WALKER DON WA.L.HOrT - • September 22, 1986 Mr. Robert Forest Holt Construction Co. P.O. Drawer 118 Graham, NC 27253 Dear Mr. Forest: Thank you very much for 7,- urninq the c e order with the required si. atu s. I have reta ie -T i ar g:inai'- for- : f les and have returned a copy'.to you;:fortIrour ' n£ormation. ✓ F If you have- `ary-'= - questions, Pl.. .e as e"dr:.o::: n o.�-:.t- ' hesitate to contact Assistant County Manager Bill Laws. Thank you. w- — _-_ Sincerely, Mrs. Beverly A. Blythe • Clerk /bab File Attachment a ,_ Distribution CHANGE Distribution to: Dail Dixon and Associates ORDER OWNER El Suite 220A Carr mill ARCHITECT Carrboro, N.C. 27510 III MA DOCUMENT G701 CONTRACTOR 0 919-968-8333 FIELD ❑ OTHER ❑ PROJECT: Orange County Animal Shelter CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 1 (name, address) Expansion, Chapel Hill, N.C. INITIATION DATE: 8-28--86 TO (Contractor): ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 85-101 Watson Electrical Construction a. P.O. Box 3105 CONTRACT FOR: Orange County Animal Wilson, N.C. 27895 Shelter Expansion L J CONTRACT DATE:2-18-86 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: Contract substantial completion date shall be extended from September 12, 1986 to October 17, 1986 per Holt Construction Co. proposal for extention. • Not valid until signed by both the Owner and Architect. Signature of the Contractor indicates his agreement herewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or Contract Time. The original (Contract Sum) fgainlltRIXMONNO6$t) was $ 9,370.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders $ .00 The (Contract Sum) (NdigiimmatuomaiKNK prior to this Change Order was $ 9,370.00 The (Contract Sum) ( ) LtXX i bXXX will be rNaXeNNK eN)X(unchanged) by this Change Order $ .00 The new (Contract Sum) (rgaiiiaiiiENINAZailgaiKincluding this Change Order will be $ 9,370.00 The Contract Time will be (increased) (d r�)NI iThi by ( 35 ) Days. The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is October 17, 1986 Authorized: Dail Dixon and Associates Watson Electrical Const. Co. Orange County ARCHITECT O TR TOR vy Suite 220A Carr Mill �.�. ox 3105 _ 106N . Margaret Lane Address Address Address 0 Carrboro, N.C. 27510 Wilson, N.C. 27895 Hills•orough, N.C. BY r� BYr. lc �L BY A L / L,'�,� DATE 2S3 (dUp 'e, DATE —/i_a `Q DATE f/ /A AIA DOCUMENT G701 • CHANGE OR DER APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIA® • C) 1978 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS,1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W.,WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 G701—1978 ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 106 EAST MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGH, N. C. 27278 MOWN CAREY BEN LLOYD aWLEYRUARWALL NORMAN WALAER DON WILL.HOIT September 22, 1986. Mr. Vincent Hoffman Watson Electrical Const. Co. P.O. Box 3105 Wilson, NC 27895 - Dear Mr. Hoffman: Thank you very much for e. urning the 0444.4e order with the required s'g atures. .[41 I have ey , �.,. . h :` 'ariv or =g r - for- _m -yam es and have returned a co a you:for your_ an— oriiiat on "�- If you havany'. questions, '`please: 'do :not_' hesitate to contact Assistant:µCounty Manager Bill Laws. Thank you. w _ Sincerely, Mrs. Beverly A. Blythe - Clerk /bab File Attachment MINUTES ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 2, 1986 The Orange County Board of Commissioners met in regular session on Tuesday, September 2 , 1986 at 7: 30 p.m. in the Board of Commissioners ' Room, Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Don Willhoit and Commissioners Shirley Marshall, Moses Carey, Ben Lloyd and Norman Walker. ATTORNEY PRESENT: Geoffrey Gledhill. STAFF PRESENT: County Manager Kenneth R. Thompson, Assistant County Managers Albert Kittrell and William Laws, Finance Director Gordon Baker, Deputy Finance Officer Ken Chavious, Clerk to the Board Beverly A. Blythe, and Director of Planning Marvin Collins. A. BOARD COMMENTS Commissioner Lloyd asked to add an item regarding the Water Conservation Ordinance. B. AUDIENCE COMMENTS 1. MATTERS ON THE PRINTED AGENDA " None. 2 . MATTERS NOT ON THE PRINTED AGENDA None. C. APPOINTMENTS ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to appoint Elizabeth Shoemaker to the Board. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. Commissioner Lloyd nominated Everett Kennedy. Commissioner Carey nominated Doug Champion. VOTE: DOUG CHAMPION -3 (Commissioners Willhoit, Marshall and Carey) EVERETT KENNEDY -2 (Commissioners Lloyd and Walker) D. MINUTES Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve the minutes for June 19, 1986 as corrected. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve the minutes for July 8 , 1986 as corrected. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to approve the minutes for the July 10, 1986 continued meeting as circulated. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve the minutes for the July 10, 1986 Special Meeting as circulated. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve the minutes for July 23 , 1986 as corrected. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve the minutes for July 29, 1986 as circulated. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to approve the minutes for August 4, 1986 as circulated. VOTE: UNANIMOUS . Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve the minutes for August 19, 1986 as corrected. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve the minutes for August 25, 1986 as circulated. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. E. RESOLUTIONS OF APPRECIATION 1. JOHN GASTINEAU The following resolution was presented to John Gastineau by Chair Willhoit on behalf of the Board: RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR JOHN GASTINEAU WHEREAS, JOHN GASTINEAU participated in discussions which led to the formation of the Orange County Economic Development Commission and has subsequently served on the Commission since 1983 ; and WHEREAS, JOHN GASTINEAU has served as Chairman of the Orange County Economic Development Commission since 1983 ; and WHEREAS, JOHN GASTINEAU has- given freely and unselfishly of his time, talents, energy and leadership from the creation of the Economic Development Commission in 1982 , through its formative first three years; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Orange County Board of Commissioners, through its members, Don Willhoit, Shirley Marshall, Moses Carey, Ben Lloyd and Norman Walker, does hereby express its sincere appreciation to JOHN GASTINEAU for his economic development efforts on behalf of the people of Orange County. THIS, the 19th day of August, 1986 . 2 . AWARD OF FINANCIAL REPORTING ACHIEVEMENT County Manager Kenneth Thompson remarked about the significance of the "Award of Financial Reporting Achievement" . This is the fourth year Orange County has received this award which is the result of the efforts of the Finance Director and his staff. Chair Willhoit presented the plaque to Gordon Baker commending him and his staff for their hard work and continuing efforts. Baker gave credit to the members of his staff for their initiative in doing a good job. F. ITEMS FOR DECISION 1. PARTIAL WIDTH R/W - GENE & BRENDA RAY MINOR SUBDIVISION Planning Director Marvin Collins presented for consideration a request for a partial width right-of-way of 30 feet for a distance of approximately 100 feet to serve a one lot minor subdivision. The lot is located in the Gene & Brenda Ray Subdivision. A partial width right-of- way is needed because there is an existing dwelling that could not meet the required 20 foot setback. The Planning Board recommended approval. Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to approve the Planning Board recommendation. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 2 . PD-2-86 HEARTWOOD AT BLACKWOOD MOUNTAIN Marvin Collins presented for consideration of approval a request from Spence and Lyn Dickinson for a planned development rezoning and Class A Special Use Permit for 35. 21 acres of land located west of Mill House Road in Chapel Hill Township. The Planning Board found the applicant not to be in compliance in the case of three specific standards. They have recommended approval of the planned development rezoning and issuance of a Class A Special Use Permit with the attachment to specific standards. Motion was made by Chair Willhoit, seconded by Commissioner Marshall that a finding of fact was made in which the Board concurred with the Planning Board finding of fact and that the three negative findings of fact are mitigated by the imposed conditions: (1) Article 8.2 . 4a negative finding is addressed by conditions 8 and 9 ; (2) Article 7 . 14 . 3c negative finding is addressed by condition 6 and, (3) Article 7 . 14 . 3e negative finding is addressed by condition 7 . VOTE: UNANIMOUS. Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Carey that a preponderance of evidence indicates compliance with the general standards, specific rules governing the specific use, and that the use complies with all required regulations and standards; it has not been found by the Board in any specific manner that: 1. The use will not promote the public health, safety and general welfare if located where proposed and developed and operated according- to the plan as submitted; 2 . The use will not maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property; 3 . The use is not in compliance with the general plans for the physical development of the county as embodied in these regulations or in the Comprehensive Plan, or portion thereof, adopted by the Orange County Board of Commissioners. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve the rezoning of the Dickinson property from R1- Residential to PD-H-R1 (35. 21 Acres) as specified in the application and to approve the issuance of a Class A Special Use Permit for the proposed Heartwood at Blackwood Mountain Development subject to the 20 conditions recommended by the Planning Board. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. THE CONDITIONS ARE LISTED BELOW: 1. The grantee of this Special Use Permit shall post with Orange County, in a form acceptable to the County Attorney, a bond or letter of credit in an amount equal to the cost of all improvements (roads, utilities, pedestrian walkways) plus 10%. The amount shall be determined on the basis of full executed construction contracts or certification by a registered engineer employed by the grantee of this Special Permit. Security for construction of the improvements in this project may follow phasing in the project. Specifically, as improvements are completed in each phase a corresponding amount of money may be released from the security instruments or the security instruments may be renegotiated based on the "yet to do" portion of the improvements. 2 . Security shall be provided for the grading, paving and stabilization of all cleared areas, streets and other vehicular travelways; pedestrian walkways; erection of street signs; utilities installation and hookup; recreational facilities; and landscaping. • 3 . All necessary easements to permit utility (electricity, telephone) installation, servicing and hookups to the development and to each unit within the development shall be provided at no cost to the utility provider. 4 . The grantee shall promulgate Articles of Incorporation governing tenancy in the development and shall record a copy of the Articles of Incorporation and Regulations promulgated under this condition in the Orange County Registry of Deeds. 5. Roads, parking areas, walkways, street signs, utilities, recreation facilities and sites, landscaping of the community center and its associated parking facility shall be maintained as constructed. All such improvements and facilities shall further be maintained and operated in a safe manner. 6. The following recommendations apply to the road and parking facilities: a. Road name signs to Orange County standards shall be erected at all intersections. b. The private Class A road serving the community center shall terminate in a cul-de-sac. The parking facility for the community center shall access off the private road, but not the cul-de-sac itself. c. The private Class A road serving the community center shall be constructed to Orange County private road standards, but shall be hard- surfaced in compliance with NCDOT Minimum Construction Standards for pavement design- for subdivision roads. The private road shall be subject to a road maintenance agreement submitted to and approved by the Orange County Attorney prior to the recordation of the Final Plat. The agreement shall be recorded with the Orange County Register of Deeds. d., Sight triangles in compliance with NCDOT requirements and Article 9 of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance shall be provided at all road intersections and shall be designated as part of the right-of-way. e. Two parking spaces meeting the dimensional requirements provided in Article 10 of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance shall be provided for each dwelling unit. The location of these items shall be approved by the Zoning officer and shown on the revised site plan. 7 . The following recommendations apply to the recreation area and facilities. a. Tot lot/playground area to include play apparatus for children, ages pre-school to 14 (i.e. swings, slides, climber, whirl) and benches for adult supervision. Some shaded areas are to be provided within the tot lot area. The tot lot area shall be defined/enclosed with a barrier. b. Picnic area to include a small shelter with 3-4 tables. One (1) trash receptacle and one (1) grill per 2 tables. c. Provide one (1) parking space for each dwelling unit. Provide one (1) handicapped parking space for every 10 spaces. Parking spaces shall meet the dimensional requirements of Article 10 of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance. Handicapped parking . spaces shall be barrier free and identified for use by individuals with physical disabilities. The handicapped parking spaces shall be a minimum of 12 ' in width and shall be designed as follows: (1) so that handicapped individuals are not compelled to wheel or walk behind parked cars (2) so that handicapped individuals can enter and exit the .vehicle onto a level surface suitable for wheeling and walking (3) in conjunction with sidewalk cut-aways and/or ramps, in compliance with the North Carolina State Building Code. d. The parking area shall be screened and landscaped in accordance with Article 12 of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance. e. Construct all walking and hiking paths with a minimum width of 4 feet and on slopes no greater than 5%. Construct all riding/hiking trails with a minimum width of 6 feet with a minimum of 2 additional feet on either side cleared of brush or vegetation and 10 feet over-head clearance. The location of these items to be approved by the Zoning Officer and shown on the revised site plan. 8 . The following recommendations apply to the lot arrangement: a. Each lot platted on the Final Plat shall include the area associated with the building site and the septic tank, including the three to be located off the property subject to the rezoning/special use permit. Appropriate easements shall be platted and recorded with the Orange County Register of Deeds along with legal descriptions and easement agreements submitted to and approved by the Orange County Attorney. b. All lots shall have Health Department approval prior to the approval of the Final Plat. c. For each structure exceeding 25 ' in height an additional one (1) foot side and front setback for every two (2) feet of additional height shall be designated on the Final Plat. The location of these items is to be approved by the Zoning Officer and shown on the revised site plan. 9 . The location of the community wells shall be approved by the N. C. Department of Human Resources, Division of Health Services, and shown on the revised site plan prior to the issuance of the Special Use Permit. 10 . All final plans for drainage, soil erosion and sedimentation control shall be reviewed and approved by Orange County and the site plan modified accordingly to satisfy the Soil and Erosion specifications, including the designation of drainage easements of a width specified by the Erosion Control. Officer along the creek and intermittent stream , prior to the issuance of the Special Use Permit. In addition, Orange County shall inspect the installation of control devices and the on-going work for the total project. The project shall at all times meet the ti requirements of the Orange County Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance. 11. Construct and maintain stormwater devices to control the peak rate of runoff from the community center and artist bungalows. The detention devices shall be designed and constructed so that the peak rate of runoff after development will not exceed the predevelopment rate for a 20 year 24 hour storm and for storms of greater intensity. 12 . Grading on the site shall be kept to a minimum. Existing vegetation shall be maintained between units. Clearing shall only be conducted for purposes of installing roads, utilities and other improvements until the improvements have been installed and the developer conveys title to the property to the individual property owners purchasing three or fewer lots. Existing vegetation shall not be removed from the area within 50 feet of the Duke Forest property line. 13 . Final landscaping plans shall be submitted and approved by the Zoning Officer prior to the effective date of the special use permit. 14 . That all signs be erected in compliance with Article 9 Signs, following issuance of a building permit and prior to the issuance of certification of Occupancy for any unit. No sign may be erected within the sight triangles for the entranceway to the development. 15 . That all structures be erected in compliance with applicable building codes following application for and issuance of building permits. 16. The developer shall coordinate mail service with the Postmaster prior to the initiation of construction. 17 . A final boundary survey of the Planned Development and all easements (roads, utilities, drainage, sign) shall be recorded by the developer. 18 . The final site plan and narrative of the project incorporating all changes, deletions and additions through the final approval of the project are incorporated herein and made a part of this Planned Development Special Use Permit. A copy of the final site plan and narrative are on file with the Orange County Planning Department. Grading and building permits, upon application, will be issued after approval and recordation of the Special Use Permit. 19 . The development shall be built and operated according to the site plan and written narrative supplied by the developer and in compliance with or fulfillment of the above conditions and the Orange County development regulations and ordinances. 20. If any of the above conditions shall be held invalid or void, then this approval shall be void and of no effect. 3 . LAKE HOGAN LAND - PRELIMINARY PLAN Marvin Collins presented for consideration of approval the preliminary plan for Lake Hogan Lane. The property is located on SR 1728 (Lake Hogan Farm Road) in Chapel Hill Township. It is bordered by agricultural and residential development and is within the Joint Planning Area which requires courtesy review from the Carrboro Planning Department. Six (6) lots are proposed out of 13 . 9 acres. The Planning Board recommended approval with the condition that the recordation of a legal document stating the unsuitability of Lot 6 for development be recorded simultaneous with the Final Plat. Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to approve the Planning Board recommendation. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 4 . MEL-OAK PHASE II (ADDITION OF LOT 23) - PRELIMINARY Marvin Collins presented for consideration of approval a revised Preliminary Plat for Mel-Oaks Phase II subdivision. The purpose of the request is to permit the addition of Lot 23 between Lot 7 (Phase I) and Lot 22 (Phase II) on Mel Oaks Drive. The property is designated Rural Buffer and Protected Water Supply Watershed - University Lake. The Planning Board recommended approval. Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to approve the Planning Board recommendation. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 5. DELVIN WOODS - PRELIMINARY Marvin Collins presented for consideration of approval the Preliminary Plan for Delvin Woods Subdivision. The property is located in Eno Township on the east side of Bivins Road (SR 1573) . Twenty (20) lots are proposed out of 23 . 8 acres with an average lot size of 1. 07 acres excluding the street right-of-way. The zoning of the property is Agricultural-Residential. The Planning Board recommended approval contingent upon the condition that dedication of a 50-foot public right- of-way along the northern boundary line of lot #11 which will extend from Delvin Lane to the eastern property line. Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to approve the Planning Board Recommendation. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 6. MANOR HILL SUBDIVISION (PHASE II) - PRELIMINARY Marvin Collins presented for consideration of approval the Preliminary Plan for Manor Hill Subdivision - Phase II. The property is located in Chapel Hill Township on the west side of Mill House Road (SR 1725) . Three lots are proposed out of 12 .23 acres with an average lot size of 1. 99 acres excluding the street right-of-way. The zoning of the property is R-1 Residential, and the Land Use Plan designation is Rural Buffer. The Planning Board recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Flatten the curve on Manor Drive where it intersects with Manor Hill Court in order to accommodate a road alignment which meets NCDOT minimum horizontal alignment criteria. 2 . Assign a lot number to the reserved area indicated on the Plan. The lot number shall be consistent with the existing numerical system. Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner Walker to approve the Planning Board recommendation. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 7 . ACRES OF NEW HOPE: DIVISION OF LOT 31 OF SECTION 5 - PRELIMINARY PLAN Marvin Collins presented for consideration of approval of the Preliminary Plan for the division of Lot #1 - Acres of New Hope, property of Robert Chandler, II. The property is located on Seminole Trail in Chapel Hill Township. It is bordered by residential development. The tract is designated as Rural Residential on the Land Use Plan. Two (2) lc'.:s are proposed out of 4 . 01 acres. The property is zoned Rural Residential . The Planning Board recommended approval . Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner r Carey to approve the Planning Board recommendation. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 8 . MORELAND - PRELIMINARY PLAN Marvin Collins presented for consideration of approval the Preliminary Plan for Moreland Subdivision. The property is located in Cheeks Township on SR 1343 (Doe Run Road) Nine (9) lots are proposed out of a 9 . 61 acre tract,. The tract is designated as Agricultural Residential on the Land Use Plan. The Planning Board recommended approval subject to lot 5 being designated of restricted development potential since a septic system cannot be located on this lot and deletion of the septic easement on lot 6 for lot 5. After further discussion and comments from Planning Board Chair Barry Jacobs and developer Paul Kempa on the condition placed on the approval by the Planning Board, motion was made by Chair Willhoit, seconded by Commissioner Walker to approve the Preliminary Plan subject to the lot lines being redrawn to provide for the minimum lot size of 40, 000 square feet and that the septic field for each lot be maintained within that 40, 000 square feet. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 9 . PINE FOREST —PRELIMINARY PLAN Marvin Collins presented for consideration of approval the Preliminary Plan for Pine Forest Subdivision. The property is located in Eno Township on SR 1567 (Pleasant Green Road) . Two lots are proposed out of an 85 acre tract. One lot is proposed to be 1. 6 acres and the other lot 1. 55 acres. The area is designated Agricultural Residential in the Land Use Plan. The Planning Board recommended approval. Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to approve the Planning Board recommendation. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 10 . RED HILL ESTATE - PRELIMINARY Marvin Collins presented for consideration of approval the Preliminary Plan for Red Hill Estate Subdivision. The property is located in Little River Township along the south side of Bill Poole Road (SR 1536) at the intersection. Eight (8) lots are proposed out of 14 . 82 acres with an average lot size of 1. 85 acres excluding the right-of-way. The property is located in an area designated Agricultural Residential in the Land Use Plan. The Planning board recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1. that the property lines stop on the right-of-way lines for Bill Poole Road and Hopkins Road, and 2 . that any power line easement be shown. Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to approve the Planning Board recommendation. VOTE: UNANIMOUS . 11. TIME EXTENSION - ANIMAL SHELTER Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to extend the contract period for the animal shelter renovation to October 16, 1986. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 12 . CHANGE ORDER FOR HOLT CONSTRUCTION - ANIMAL SHELTER 13 . CHANGE ORDER FOR ACME PLUMBING AND HEATING - ANIMAL SHELTER Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to approve two change orders to cover the cost of a counter top at $167 . 00 and a sink at $90. 00. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. • t ADDED ITEM AMENDMENT TO THE WATER CONSERVATION ORDINANCE Commissioner Lloyd made reference to the fact that the Ordinance only alludes to Lake Orange and does not consider the water level of Lake Ben Johnston and Corporation Lake. He noted that the two impoundments are full and running over the dam. He suggested that Article 3B in the Ordinance be amended to indicate that in the event the water level of Lake Orange declines to a stage III elevation of water below the spillway and if Corporation Lake and Lake Ben Johnston fall two feet or more below their spillway level without any release from Lake Orange a stage III water shortage WARNING shall be deemed in effect. Commissioner Marshall suggested this situation be referred to John Wray and the Division of Water Resources for their response. Ken Thompson noted that the true water volume is not known for Corporation Lake and Lake Ben Johnston. Chair Willhoit suggested that a way to lift the restrictions when Lake Orange is below 24" may be to add an amendment that would provide for the lifting of the restrictions if Lake Ben Johnston and Corporation Lake is at 100% and the instream flow requirement is being met. Discussion ensued on the Stage III restrictions and the possibility of removing the restrictions for car wash establishments from the Ordinance for now until a response can be received from the Division of Water Resources. Ken Thompson indicated he would rather the Ordinance be maintained as is until a report is received from John Wray. Lake Orange is a large impoundment while Lake Ben Johnston and Corporation Lake are small impoundments. The County Manager was requested to submit a recommendation to the Board at their next regular meeting. G. ADJOURNMENT With no further items for the Board to consider, Chair Willhoit adjourned the meeting. The next regular meeting will be held on Tuesday, September 16, 1986, 7 : 30 p.m. in the Courtroom of the old Post Office, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Don Willhoit, Chair Beverly A. Blythe, Clerk