Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 06-17-1986 iBACKUP MATERIAL AvAILA}BLEi:, IN MANAGER'S OFFICE - UPON REQUEST) ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AGENDA REGULAR SCHEDULED MEETING TUESDAY, JUNE 17, 1986 7: 30 P.M. OLD POST OFFICE CHAPEL HILL, N.C. A. BOARD COMMENTS B. AUDIENCE COMMENTS 1. Matters on the Printed Agenda 2. Matters not on the Printed Agenda PAGE # C. PUBLIC HEARINGS 001 1. Meadow Lane--Assessment Roll 011 2. Rollingwood Road and Stallings Road--Assessment Roll 023 3 . Impact Fees D. PUBLIC HEARINGS TO BE CONTINUED UNTIL JULY 7, 1986 1. PD-2 .86 Heartwood at Blackwood Mountain (Continuation of Public Hearing) 2 . Pantry Area Study (Continuation of Public Hearing) E. REPORTS 024 1. Telephone Technical Task Force Reports 025 2 . Eubanks Landfill Usage Complaint F. ITEMS FOR DECISION---CONSENT AGENDA (Any item may be removed for separate consideration) 026 1. Extended Telephone Area Service Cost Data 026 2. Housing and Community Development Property Disposal 031 3 . Packer Unit Replacement Bids 033 4. Encroachment Agreement—Southern Railway Company 037 5. Fireworks Display--Kenan Stadium 038 6. Demolition Contract Award 057 7. Orange Grove--Preliminary Plan 074 8 . Lynwood Acres II: Division of Lot 1--Preliminary Plan 093 9 . Torain Estates--Preliminary Plan 102 10. Date and Lovie Parrish Minor Subdivision--Partial Width R/W 111 11. Class A Road--Phyllis Arnold Minor Subdivision 117 12 . Reclassification of Quaker Lake and Graham-Mebane Watersheds 121 13 . Budget Amendment (0vE ) PAGE # 123 14 . Lease Rene al with JOCCA 135 15. Lease Rene al with the Community School for People Under Six 147 16. Lease Rene al for Efland Rescue Unit Building 151 17. Lease Reneiwal for Wake Opportunities, Inc. 162 18. Job Training Partnership Act Agreement 171 19. Recycling Report G. ITEMS FOR DECISON--OTHER 001 1. Meadow Lane--Assessment Roll on 2 . Rollingwood Road and Stallings Road--Assessment Roll 023 3 . Impact Fees--Resolution 178 4. Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant--Presentations by CASH and CP & L on Evacuation Plan and Plant Start-Up 179 5. Financial Disclosure by County Officials 181 6. Governor's Highway Program Proposal 184 7. Alert Cable Request for Expansion of Franchise Service Area 187 8 . Transportation Development Plan 188 9 . Homestead Highlands--Preliminary Plan 224 10. Mel-Oak Ph se II--Preliminary Plan 239 11. Demonstratjon Project to Provide Outreach Activi- ties Faci itator for Orange County Domiciliary Homes 251 12 . Voting Cre ential--NACo Conference H. PROCLAMATION 252 1. Declare "July is National Recreation and Parks Month" in Orange County 254 I. APPOINTMENTS J. ADJOURNMENT F ;' 1 APPROVED AUGUST 4, 1986 MINUTES ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REGULAR MEETING JUNE 17, 1986 The Orange County Board of Commissioners met in regular session on June 17, 1986, 7:30 p.m. in the Courtroom of the old Post Office, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Don Willhoit and Commissioners Shirley Marshall, Moses Carey, Ben Lloyd and Norman Walker. ATTORNEY PRESENT: Geoffrey Gledhill. STAFF PRESENT: County Manager Kenneth R. Thompson, Assistant County Managers William T. Laws and Albert Kittrell, Director of Emergency Manage- ment Bobby Baker, Clerk to the Board Beverly A. Blythe, Director of Planning Marvin Collins, Purchasing Director Pam Jones and Public Works Director Wilbur McAdoo. A. BOARD COMMENTS None. B. AUDIENCE COMMENTS 1. MATTERS ON THE PRINTED AGENDA Chair Willhoit indicated that those citizens who wish to comment on any of the items on the printed agenda will be recognized at the time that item is discussed. 2. MATTERS NOT ON THE PRINTED AGENDA None. C. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. MEADOW LANE ASSESSMENT Roth Director of Planning Marvin Collins presented for the receipt of public comment the Preliminary Assessment Roll for meadow Lane (SR 1195) . The Clerk to the Board has filed a Certificate of Mailing which certifies that the notices of this public hearing and notices of individual assessment were mailed on or before June 6, 1986. The amount to be assessed includes the local share of the construction costs and project administrative costs. The combined total specified on the adopted Assessment Resolution is $10,514. 01. THERE BEING NO PUBLIC COMMENTS, THE HEARING WAS CLOSED. 2 . ROLLINGWOOD ROAD AND STALLINGS ROAD ASSESSMENT ROLL Marvin Collins presented for the receipt of public comment the Preliminary Assessment Roll for Rollingwood Road (SR 1194) and Stallings Road (SR 1198) . The Clerk to the Board has filed a Certificate of Mailing which certifies that the notices of this public hearing and notices of individual assessments were mailed on or before June 6, 1986. The amount to be assessed includes the local share of the construction costs and project administrative costs. The combined total specified on the adopted Asses2 s- ment Resolution is $20,768. 63, THERE BEING NO PUBLIC COMMENTS, THE HEARING WAS CLOSED. 3 . IMPACT FEES Marvin Collins presented for the receipt of public comment a reso- lution requesting that the legislative delegation introduce special legis- lation in the 1986 Session of the General Assembly, to enable the County to establish a system of Impact Fees. The Planning Board, Planning Staff and Board of Commissioners have expressed a desire for such legislation and to incorporate impact fees into the planning process countywide. In order to accommodate the Carrboro and Chapel Hill Land Use Ordinance and Chapel Hill development standards, it would be necessary to have such a system of impact fees authorized. Fees would be designed to help defray the cost of expand- ing public facilities and the costs would be placed on new development on a per lot or per unit assessment. Collins briefly summarized the purposes of the impact fees. Commissioner Walker asked for further clarification on what would be included for impact fees and expressed a concern that it would create double taxation on the developer. THERE BEING NO PUBLIC COMMENTS, THE HEARING WAS CLOSED. D. PUBLIC HEARINGS TO BE CONTINUED UNTIL JULY 7, 1986 Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve the continuation of the public hearings for Heartwood at Black- wood Mountain and the Pantry Area Study until July 7, 1986. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. E. REPORTS 1. TELEPHONE TECHNICAL TASK FORCE Dick Helwig, Chair of the Telephone Technical Task Force, reported on the Commissioners' action that is before the Utilities Commission with regard to telephone long distance failure in Central and Northern Orange County from April 3-11. The responses that have been received from the telephone companies and the Utilities Commission all indicate that the failure was extremely massive and widespread. The task force recommends that the Board consider requesting the Utilities Commission for an extension to mid July. Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve the letter addressed to the Utilities Commission which requests an extension of time for a response until mid July and authorize the Chairman to sign on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. Helwig also reported on the extended telephone area service cost data. He briefly summarized the report. it has been determined that a digital switch will resolve the switching problems and help diagnose cable problems and give everyone access to all the long distance lines. The switch that Centel plans to install in an appropriate switch. The task force recommends that the Board consider requesting Centel provide to the task force a list of precisely what will go into the system and a comprehen- sive list of auxiliary equipment (long distance connections, cable plan, etc. ) and that these lists, along with a report from the task force be forwarded to the North Carolina Utilities Commission asking them to review Centel 's upgrade proposal for (a) technical accuracy, (b) its timeliness, 3 and (c) its overall appropriateness. He reviewed the 911 enhance system and noted the task force does request the Board to consider the installation of this system at the same time the new system is being installed. 2 . EUBANKS LANDFILL USAGE COMPLAIN The County Manager summarized a meeting he had with the staff of the landfill. Three (3) organizations have permission to enter the landfill before normal business hours. They include the two sanitation departments of the County and the Town of Chapel Hill and the physical plant department at the University. Commissioner Walker questioned the use of the landfill by the University since it belongs to Chapel Hill, Carrboro and Orange County. Ken Thompson explained that the University uses the landfill at around 7: 00 a.m. It is the City and the County that use the landfill at 3: 00 a.m. The Town of Chapel Hill operates the landfill and permission to the Univer- sity was granted by the City. They have assured that no toxic wastes are being dumped in the landfill. Discussion ensued with comments from citizens in the audience. Motion was made by Commissioner Walker, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to request that Terry Dover of the Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste with the Department of Natural Resources provide information indicating the amount of hazardous waste produced by the University and the designation of such materials. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. F. ITEMS FOR DECISION - CONSENT AGENDA The County Manager recommended the following action by the Board: 1. EXTENDED TELEPHONE AREA SERVICE COST DATA To approve the following recommendations made by the Technical Telephone Task Force to the Orange county Commissioners that: a. Centel be requested to present a comprehensive list of the software features that will be initially installed in Hills- borough and their itemized justification for excluding features. b. Centel be requested to present a comprehensive list of auxiliary equipment that will be initially installed in Hillsborough. c. The North Carolina Utilities Commission be requested to examine these lists, findings in this report including service problems and the timing of the proposed upgrades and render an opinion as to the ability of the proposed installation to meet the needs of the service area, and as to the timeliness of the upgrades. d. Centel be asked to accelerate the installation schedule of the switch. e. this Task Force continue to monitor the upgrade process and continue to evaluate the condition of the outside plant and toll facilities of Centel. f. this task force engage a similar review of phone service provided by Southern Bell, General Telephone and Mebane Home Phone throughout the rest of the County. g. Since SouthernNet has expressed an interest, encourage it to connect a fiber optic line directly to the Hillsborough switch to provide a much needed alternative path to the world, and h. seek enhanced 911 service with the delivery of the switch since factory installation is cheaper than dealer add-ons. 2 . DISPOSAL OF PROPERTY FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 4 To award the bid to Mr. Jack Payne for the 12 ' x 56 ' mobile home for a Sum of $500; Mrs. Janet Thomas for the 12 ' x 60 ' mobile home for a sum of $1202 . 65; allowing the security deposits on each to be used as a part of the bid price; and to authorize the Director of Purchasing to release titles on mobile homes to said parties. To reject the bid for land due to disparity between bid price and its appraised value and authorize the Director of Purchasing to advertise for rebid using the public auction upset bid method as provided in the General Statutes. 3 . PACKER UNIT REPLACEMENT BIDS To award the bid for one (1) 38 yard packer unit at $32, 675 net cost (includes $1000 trade in) to Carolina Waste Systems, Hamlet, North Carolina. 4 . ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT FOR SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY Item was deleted by the County Attorney. 5. FIREWORKS DISPLAY AT KENAN STADIUM To authorize the issuance of a permit for the exhibition with the provision that proper evidence of general liability insurance be delivered to the Orange County Purchasing Director by Friday, June 27, 1986. The insurance is to name Orange county as an additional insured. 6. DEMOLITION, LOT CLEARING AND HAULING SERVICES CONTRACT AWARD To award the bid to R. W. Jones Grading and Hauling Company, Hillsborough, North Carolina as the lowest responsible bidder. 7. ORANGE GROVE PRELIMINARY PLAN To approve the preliminary plan subject to the following conditions: (1) Lots in the Orange Grove Mobile Home Estates subdivision must be combined to meet the minimum lot size requirement of 40, 000 square feet outside of the road right-of-way and the subdi- vision replatted and recorded. (Compliance with this condition requires that the applicant record a combination plat which provides for the right-of-way requirements for a public road prior to final plat approval for the Orange Grove Subdivision. All existing structures in the Orange Grove Mobile Home Estates Subdivision must comply with the setback requirements for the district and be indicated on the combination plat. ) (2) Property lines must follow the sight distance lines at the intersection with SR 1006, as recommended by NCDOT. (Com- pliance with this condition requires that the combination plat referenced in condition #1 include the sight distance require ments as part of the dedicated right-of-way and not as part of Lots #1 and 16 as shown on the revised preliminary plan. ) (3) Health Department approval of each lot for on site wastewater systems. (All lots as shown on the revised preliminary plan have received approval of the Orange County Health Department. This condition is no longer applicable. ) 8. LYNWOOD ACRES II - DIVISION OF LOT #1 - PRELIMINARY PLAN 5 To approve the Preliminary Plan contingent upon the developer providing a vicinity map on the Final Plat. 9. TORAIN ESTATES - PRELIMINARY PLAN To approve the Preliminary Plan with the following conditions: (1) Indicate adjacent property owners and/or adjoining subdi- visions to the east and west of the site. (2) Renumber the lots as #1 and #2 and delete references to Lots A, B and C. (3) Indicate total acreage of the property. (4) Indicate any existing structures on the plan. 10. DATE AND LOVIE PARRISH MINOR SUBDIVISION - PARTIAL WIDTH R/W To approve the minor subdivision for Date and Lovie Parrish. 11. CLASS A ROAD - PHYLLIS ARNOLD MINOR SUBDIVISION To approve the request for a Class A private road to serve the new one (1) acre lot of Phyllis Arnold for approval. 12. RECLASSIFICATION OF QUAKER LAKE AND GRAHAM-MEBANE WATERSHEDS To adopt a resolution of support as stated below: RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE RECLASSIFICATION OF QUAKER LAKE AND GRAHAM- MEBANE WATERSHEDS FROM WS-III TO WS-I WHEREAS, the North Carolina Environment Management Commission proposes to adopt and implement new descriptive classifications for water supply water- sheds to provide more appropriate protection for surface water supplies used as a raw water source for drinking water; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Graham has petitioned the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission to reclassify the Quaker Lake and proposed Graham-Mebane Reservoir watersheds from WS-III to WS-I; and WHEREAS, Orange County supports a comprehensive water supply watershed management program throughout the County including the Back Creek Reservoir Watershed Critical Area Treatment program; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Board of County Commissioners of Orange County supports the resolution requesting the reclassification of Quaker Lake Watershed and proposed Graham-Mebane Watershed from WS-III to WS-I. Adopted this the 17th day of June, 1986. 13 . BUDGET AMENDMENTS To approve a budget amendment to the 1985-86 Budget Ordinance to establish EMS-Air Ambulance (In-Flight) budget as follows: Appropriation - EMS - Air Ambulance $ 33,737 Source - N.C. Memorial Hospital $ 33,737 14. LEASE RENEWAL WITH JOCCA To approve the lease renewal July 1, 1986 through June 30, 1987 between Joint Orange-Chatham Community Action, Inc. and the County of Orange for space to be used as a Community Center at the Cedar Grove Multipurpose Center, Cedar Grove, North Carolina and authorize the Chair to sign. 6 15. LEASE RENEWAL WITH THE COMMUNITY SCHOOL FOR PEOPLE UNDER SIX To approve the lease renewal July 1, 1986 through June 30, 1987 between the County of Orange and the Community School for People Under Six for space to be used as a day care center at Northside Multipurpose Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina and authorize the Chair to sign. 16. LEASE RENEWAL FOR EFLAND RESCUE UNIT BUILDING To approve the lease renewal between the Efland Rescue Unit, Efland Volunteer Fire Company, Inc. , and Orange County for the Efland Rescue Unit building in Efland, North Carolina to continue for a period of one year commencing July 1, 1986 and terminating at 12: 00 midnight June 30, 1987 and authorize the Chair to sign. 17. LEASE RENEWAL WITH WAKE OPPORTUNITIES, INC. To approve the lease renewal between Wake Opportunities, Inc. , Tenant and Orange County, lessor for space to be used as a Day Care Center at Cedar Grove Multipurpose Center, Cedar Grove, N.C. for a period of one year commencing July 1, 1986 and terminating at 12:00 midnight June 30, 1987 and authorize the Chair to sign said lease renewal on behalf of Orange County. 18. JOB TRAINING PARTNERSHIP ACT AGREEMENT NOTE: This item was moved from the consent agenda to be considered independently. 19. RECYCLING REPORT To refer to the Manager for staff analysis and to bring back a recommendation after conferring with the other representatives of the governing bodies which own and operate the landfill. Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Marshall that the forgoing action be taken by the Board. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 18. JOB TRAINING PARTNERSHIP ACT AGREEMENT Commissioner Carey questioned if the concerns raised at the time the work plan was approved had been addressed and Bob Ferguson indicated that those concerns were incorporated in the agreement. Assistant County Manager Albert Kittrell assured the Board that a mechanism had been established that will monitor the activities to assure that all the goals would be met. A copy of this procedure will be ' to provided ide d the Board. Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to approve the renewal of JTPA Central Piedmont Consortium and Private Industry Council/Chief Elected Officials Agreements through June 30, 1988. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. G. ITEMS FOR DECISION - OTHER 1. MEADOW LANE - ASSESSMENT ROLL Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner 7 Lloyd to confirm the assessment roll, accept the Certificate of Mailing offered by the Clerk and direct the Tax Collector to collect the assessment. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 2 . ROLLINGWOOD ROAD AND STALLINGS ROAD ASSESSMENT ROLL Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Carey to confirm the assessment roll, accept the Certificate of Mailing offered by the Clerk and direct the Tax Collector to collect the assessment. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 3. IMPACT FEES RESOLUTION Commissioner Lloyd and Walker expressed concern that impact fees would hinder affordable housing. Chair Willhoit stated that impact fees would lessen the burden on the property tax and put the burden on new development. Commissioner Carey and Chair Willhoit spoke in support of afford- able housing. Planning Board Chair Barry Jacobs informed the Board that the Planning Board voted 7-1 to support the County Commissioners in their efforts to request enabling legislation for impact fees. Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Orange County has been experiencing a rapid rate of growth; and WHEREAS, many of the County's public facilities are approaching their capacity to respond to increasing demands; and WHEREAS, the County has identified a need to implement a system of Impact Fees to partially fund the public improvements that will be needed by new development; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Orange County hereby requests that members of its legislative delegation introduce the attached special legis- lation in the 1986 Session of the General Assembly, to enable the County to establish a system of Impact Fees. This the 17th Day of June, 1986. VOTE: AYES, 3; NOES, 2 (Commissioners Lloyd and Walker) . 4. SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT - PRESENTATIONS BY CASH AND CP&L ON EVACUATION PLAN AND PLANT START-UP PRESENTATION BY CASH PHYLLIS LOTCHIN referred to the resolution recommended by Chair Don Willhoit and suggested that paragraph four which makes reference to the ten-mile evacuation planning zone be amended that would require CP&L to deal with worst case accidents. An evacuation plan predicated on a loss of coolant is a much less potentially dangerous accident than any accident which may reach the containment vessel. She suggested that health statistics be collected for the area around the plant and that they continue to be monitored. She stated that if stopping the plant is not possible everything must be done to protect the health and safety of the citizens. JANE SHARP stated it has been proven that people can survive until the year 2000 and beyond on solar energy and conser- vation, a small amount of gas and burning some waste. She asked that CP&L be requested to move in this direction. MARGARET STETSON expressed concerns about the medical and 8 public health risk that the Shearon Harris Plant posses to citizens in Orange County. She referred to a worst possible scenario and illustrated the magnitude of treating just one patient. She expressed her biggest fear is the long-term effects of radiation and gave several examples. She feels the hospital facilities is this area are not adequate to handle contaminated patients. She expressed concerns about the water becoming contaminated and the associated problems. DOUG CRAWFORD expressed concerns about the uncertainties of the effects of low level radiation and the problematic risks that follow nuclear accidents. This should be addressed before the problem can actually be determined and studied. JOE HERTZENBERG spoke against the nuclear power plant. He spoke about the integrity of the democratic process, the integrity of the representative government and the integrity of the processes of the political party. He pointed out that the democratic party is against the starting up of the Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant. RICHARD WHITTED asked that both resolutions presented by CASH be considered for adoption. He noted that everyone needs to be concerned about an evacuation plan. Orange County needs to know if their is an evacuation plan and if it is effective enough that the citizens can feel safe. He asked that CP&L be requested to consider an alternative to nuclear power. KIRSTEN NYROP made reference to the resolutions that were approved by Carrboro, Chapel Hill and Hillsborough in which requests were made to include the municipalities in the evacu- ation plan and to ask CP&L to consider converting Shearon Harris to nonnuclear fuel. She spoke about the costs associated with not starting up the plant or converting the plant to nonnuclear fuel. She also reviewed the costs associated with the start-up of the plant that would be saved. She question the dollar value assigned to the quality of life of the citizens in the surrounding counties as they worry and wonder if their will be an accident at Shearon Harris or an accident in transporting materials to and from the plant. She asked if the safety of the citizens can be guaranteed. CAROLINA POWER AND LIGHT EDWARD LILLY, Executive Vice-President of CP&L, made comments about the Shearon Harris Plant and nuclear power in general. He stated that in order to have adequate energy nuclear power must be utilized. He spoke about the costs of construction and indicated that nuclear fuel is less expensive than coal or oil. He expounded on the safety of nuclear plants. He talked about the effects of radiation on the body and stated that less than 5 mg a year would be picked up during a year by someone living next door to a nuclear plant. He stated that no one has been killed or seriously injured in the U.S. from the operation of nuclear plants. CP&L cannot guarantee that no accident will happen. They can guarantee that no accident will happen similar to that one at Chernobyl because the nuclear plants are built differently than those in other countries. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board have reviewed allegations and have said in their opinion, the plant can be operated without any undue risk to the public and recommended that the license be issued for the operation of the plant. To convert to some 9 other form of fuel would mean a new building would have to be built alongside the present one. Any substantial delay would cost up to two million dollars a year. He spoke about the evacuation plan and explained the 10-mile evacuation zone. He summarized those groups and persons who have endorsed the opening of the nuclear plant. He asked consideration be given to the resolution CP&L has distributed. DISABLED PERSONS OPPOSED TO SHEARON HARRIS LINDA BROYLES asked CP&L about the evacuation of the handi- capped and Lilly indicated that the evacuation plan is detailed and assured Ms. Broyles that assistance will be available for those who are handicapped. She thanked the Board for being receptive to the citizens who are concerned about the start-up of Shearon Harris. She criticized CP&L and their lack of concern for the citizenry around the plant and lack of a specific procedure for disabled citizens. She asked that the uncertainties be addressed by CP&L. Chair Willhoit made comments about his resolution and indicated it includes the formation of a "blue-ribbon" task force which would have the responsibility of addressing those concerns expressed by the citizens of Orange County. CP&L endorsed the forming of a task force and pledged cooperation. Commissioner Carey recommended an amendment to the resolution as pre- sented by Chair Willhoit which would request that CP&L do a study for con- version of the Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant to nonnuclear fuel use and that this study be made available to the general public. Commissioner Marshall questioned the concern expressed by Phyllis Lotchin that CP&L address the worst case scenario in their evacuation plan. Edward Lilly expressed his confidence that the evacuation area of 10 miles will be sufficient. Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to approve the following resolution as presented by Chair Willhoit with an amendment as indicated above and listed below as #4. A RESOLUTION REGARDING THE SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT WHEREAS, the Orange County Board of Commissioners is strongly committed to protecting the general health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Orange County; and WHEREAS, the Orange County Commissioners have ultimate responsibility for the protection of people and property within Orange County; and WHEREAS, numerous citizens have expressed grave concern over the potential effects the plant could have upon the general health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Orange County; and WHEREAS, the ten-mile evacuation planning zone is predicated on a Loss of Coolant Accident rather than a "worst case scenario" and the Chernobyl nuclear disaster indicates the need to restudy the size of the evacuation planning zone; and WHEREAS, prompt notification of events that may endanger citizens is crucial to implementation of effective emergency plans; and WHEREAS, independent monitoring of the environs of the plant would help to reassure citizens that the plant was operating properly; and WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners wishes to express its grave concern to the Governor, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Federal Emergency Management officials, and Carolina Power and Light over the potential hazardous effects a nuclear power plant and its byproducts may have upon 0 Orange County citizens; 10 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Orange County Board of commissioners that in the interests of protecting the general health, safety, and welfare of its citizens, the Board does hereby request the appropriate authorities institute the following safety measures prior to any licensing, loading, activation, and operation of the Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant: 1. That the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Federal Emergency Management Agency extend the required emergency evacuation zone to include Orange county and that the Orange County Emergency Communications center be included in the automatic ringdown system, 2 . that Carolina Power and Light and State Emergency Management officials assist Orange County emergency Management in preparing and testing the evacuation and notification plan subsequent to its approval by the Board of Commissioners, 3 . That Carolina Power and Light be required to enter into an agree- ment with an independent qualified research agency to provide both baseline and post plant start-up data on air quality in the area. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill would be an ideal body to regularly gather, monitor, and publicly and independently report the results of air quality testing to the appropriate federal and state regulatory agencies, the Carolina Power and Light, and local government officials. 4. That Carolina Power and Light be requested to do a study for con- version of the Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant to nonnuclear fuel use and that this study be made available to the general public. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Orange County Board of Commissioners that the Board fully recognizes the potential monetary costs involved in accomplish- ing the aforementioned steps; however, the Board feels these costs are insignificant when compared with the potential losses that might occur as a result of a nuclear accident. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Orange County Board of Commissioners in- tends to establish a "blue-ribbon" task force to advise on development of an appropriate emergency response plan for Orange County. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 5. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE BY COUNTY OFFICIALS Commissioner Walker presented information on this item adding that all elected officials, appointed officials and county appointees to all Board and Commissions should be required to complete a financial disclosure statement. Commissioner Marshall concurred in that all holdings should be revealed by every Commissioner. Commissioner Carey spoke in support of a policy which would include all the elected officials but not the appointed officials. Commissioner Lloyd recommended this item be tabled and that a public hearing be held. Richard Helwig reviewed the resolution as passed by the Orange County Democratic Party and explained the procedure followed in the approval of resolutions by the Democratic Party. A motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd to table this item and hold a public hearing. MOTION FAILED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. A motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to adopt the resolution as proposed by the Orange County Democratic Party and that it be forwarded immediately to the legislative delegation. RESOLUTION ORANGE COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY CONVENTION APRIL 5, 1986 4. WHEREAS, the 1985 Orange County Democratic Party Platform state that: "All elected officials, and appointed officials in high policy making positions should be required to annually disclose significant property or business holdings, or disclose sources of income which may reasonably affect their judgment in office" ; and, WHEREAS, other jurisdictions, in fast growing areas of North Carolina, including Guilford County, Wake County, Raleigh, Charlotte, and Durham have ethics policies or are considering their adoptions; and, WHEREAS, a stiff conflict of interest code in Guilford County (requested by Guilford officials and enacted by the N.C. legislature in 1974) has worked well for Guilford county Commissioners; and, WHEREAS, the potential for conflict of interest by public officials in Orange County is increasing because of rapid development in the area. BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Orange County Board of Commissioners be urged to request the N.C. State Legislature to enact a code of ethics for members of the Orange County Board of Commissioners. This code should provide for complete disclosure of real property holdings in Orange County and ownership interests in firms doing business with Orange County. Board members should be required to disqualify themselves for voting on any matter involving any ownership interest. VOTE: AYES, 4 ; NOES, 1 (Commissioner Lloyd) . 6. GOVERNOR'S HIGHWAY PROGRAM PROPOSAL Motion was made by Chair Willhoit, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to oppose the transfer of funds from the State General Fund to the Highway Fund until such time the State is able to meet its obligations to local government and its' mandates it has already provided and meet its commitments to education. VOTE: AYES, 3 ; NOES, 2 (Commissioners Lloyd and Walker) 7. ALERT CABLE REOUEST FOR EXPANSION OF FRANCHISE SERVICE AREA Joe Surles spoke in support of his request for an amendment to the Cable TV Franchise in which the restriction which permits it to serve only those homes which were connected to Alert's system would be amended to remove this restriction so that it may provide service generally to the citizens of Orange County. Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner Carey to reestablish the Cable Television Citizen Advisory Committee to review the Alert Cable TV service area expansion request and to draft specific standards by which an amendment may be considered by the Board. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 8. TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to approve the Transportation Development Plan as presented by the County Manager. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. (Chair Willhoit was out of the room) 9. HOMESTEAD HIGHLANDS PRELIMINARY PLAN Marvin Collins presented for consideration of approval the Preliminary Plan for Homestead Highlands. Piedmont Atlantic Inc. has requested approval of a subdivision for 47. 19 acres of land located off Homestead Road (SR 1177) to permit construction of a seventy-eight (78) lot subdivision to be developed in three phases. The Planning Board recommended approval with the attachment of ten (10) conditions. Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve the Preliminary Plan subject to the following conditions: (1) designation of the southernmost boundary of the stream buffer on Lot #9 on the Final Plat. (2) Designate remaining acreage of original tract for "future development" . (3) Indicate total acreage and open space acreage. (4) Include notation on applicable setback dimensions and revise the front and side setbacks for corner lots to comply with the provisions of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance. (5) Include complete notation on plat regarding restricted use of stream buffer. (6) Provide dedicated 10 ' x 70' sight easements at all street intersections. (7) Provide a turn lane on Homestead Road as recommended by NCDOT. (8) Provide temporary turn-arounds within dedicated rights-of-way as required by NCDOT. (9) Renumber lots consecutively within phases. (10)Provide a 60' right-of-way for Claymore Road. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 10. MEL-OAK PHASE II PRELIMINARY PLAN Marvin Collins presented for consideration of approval the Preliminary Plan for Mel-Oaks Phase II Subdivision. Calvin Mellott has requested approval of a subdivision for 10 acres of land located off Jones Ferry Road (SR 1942) on an extension of a previously created road known as Mel Oak Drive in Chapel Hill Township to permit construction of an eight (8) lot subdivision. The property is designated Rural Buffer and Protected Water Supply Watershed - University Lake. The property is zoned R-1 and Protected Watershed II. The Planning Board recommended approval with the attachment of seven (7) conditions. Three of the conditions have been satisfied. Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to approve the Preliminary Plan for Mel-Oak Phase II with the attachment of the following conditions: (1) Provide a 300' right turn lane taper on Jones Ferry Road as recommended by NCDOT. (2) Provide a temporary turnaround within a dedicated right-of-way for Mel Oak road as required by NCDOT (Compliance with this condition requires that the cul-de-sac be platted as part of the right-of-way and not as part of a lot. ) (3) Provide a dedicated 10 ' x 70 ' sight easement at the intersection of Mel Oak Drive and the future right-of-way extension to the Nancy Williams Lands (Compliance with this condition requires that the sight easements be platted as part of the right-of-way and not as part of a lot. ) (4) Revise the plat in compliance with the requests of NCDOT: (a) delete the dedicated right-of-way for the cul-de-sac platted for Mel Oak Phase I and incorporate the right-of-way into Lots #7, 8 and 9 (Compliance with this condition requires that Lots #8 and 9 be replatted with the revised right-of-way. ) (b) Provide for the transition in right-of-way between the 60' and 50 ' sections of Mel Oak Drive (Compliance with this condition requires that the Final Plat correspond with NCDOT approved road construction plans. ) 5. Replat the cul-de-sac for Mel Oak Drive to terminate at the southern lot lines, of Lots #18 and 19 and designate a dedicated 50 ' right-of-way extending from the cul-de-sac north to the McLamb property (ADDED BY PLANNING BOARD - Planning Staff recommended that Mel Oak Drive extension be constructed across the applicant's frontage to the McLamb property line. Compliance with the Planning board's condition requires that the cul-de-sac be extended northward to provide Lots #18 and 19 with adequate road frontage. ) VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 11. DEMONSTRATION PROJECT TO PROVIDE OUTREACH ACTIVITIES FACILITATOR FOR ORANGE COUNTY DOMICILIARY HOMES Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Marshall that a letter of support be drafted by the Chair and sent to the Domiciliary Home Community Advisory Committee endorsing a proposal to hire a Therapeutic Recreation Specialist for planning, implementing and evaluating activities at the sixteen (16) Family Care and Rest Homes in Orange County. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 12. VOTING CREDENTIAL - NACo CONFERENCE Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Carey to designate Don Willhoit as the voting delegate for the NACo Conference to be held in July. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. H. PROCLAMATION 1. DECLARE "JULY IS NATIONAL RECREATION AND PARKS MONTH" IN ORANGE COUNTY Motion was made by Commissioner Walker, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve the following proclamation: PROCLAMATION OF "JULY IS NATIONAL RECREATION AND PARKS MONTH" IN ORANGE COUNTY WHEREAS, positive leisure experiences are vital to good physical and mental health, and enhance the quality of life for all people; and WHEREAS, the Orange County Board of County Commissioners recognizes the benefits derived to the County by offering these leisure experiences; and WHEREAS, the Orange County Recreation and Parks Department offers programs encompassing a multitude of activities that can result in personal accomplishment, self-satisfaction and family unity for all citizens, regardless of their background, ability, level or age; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners wishes to encourage and endorse the concept of "July is National Recreation and Parks Month" in Orange County; and WHEREAS, Governor Martin has proclaimed "July is National Recreation and Parks Month" in North Carolina; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED THAT THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DOES HEREBY PROCLAIM "JULY IS NATIONAL RECREATION AND PARKS MONTH" IN ORANGE COUNTY. BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board of Commissioners encourages all citizens of Orange County to participate in the leisure activities sponsored by the Orange County Recreation and Parks Department, not only during this designated month, but year-round. This the 17th day of June, 1986. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. I. APPOINTMENTS HILLSBOROUGH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Carey to appoint David Smudski to the Hillsborough Board of Adjustment. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to continue the meeting to June 18, 1986 at 7:30 p.m. to consider the remainder of the appointments. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. J. ADJOURNMENT With no further business to come before the Board, Chair Willhoit adjourned the meeting. The next regular meeting will be held on July 7, 1986, 7:30 p.m. in the Commissioners' Room, Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina. Don Willhoit, Chair Beverly A. Blythe, Clerk O R A N G E C O U N T Y BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 001 ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date JUNE 17, 198 Action/1Agenda SUBJECT: MEADOW LANE - ASSESSMENT ROLL Item 1. DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING X Yes No Attachment(s) Information Contact: SUSAN SMITH PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL CERTIFICATE OF MAILING Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 PURPOSE: To receive public comment on the Preliminary Assessment Roll for Meadow Lane (SR 1195) . - To confirm the Final Assessment Roll for the project. NEED: Public input on the Preliminary Assessment Roil , filed with the Clerk to the Board and containing a tax description of each parcel of land to be assessed, the basis for the assessment, the amount assessed against each parcel of land, the terms of payment and the name of the owner of each parcel as can be ascertained from County fax records, is necessary to complete the program procedures for the project. The Clerk to the Board has filed a Certificate of Mailing which certifies that the notices of this public hearing and notices of individual assessments were mailed on or before June 6, 1986 . The amount to be assessed includes the local share of the construction costs and project administrative costs . The combined total specified on the adopted Assessment, Resolution is $10,514.01 . IMPACT: Upon close of the public hearing and confirmation of the Assessment Roll for the Meadow Lane project, the Board can direct that the Assessment Roll be delivered to the Orange County Tax Collector for collection . , RECOMMENDATION: Confirm the Assessment Roll . Accept the Certificate of Mailing offered by the Clerk . Direct the Tax Collector to collect the assessment. JTAL LOCAL SHARE: $10,514.01 OTAL FRONTAGE: 2452.92 ASSESSMENT RATE; 4.2864/FOOT 002 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FINANCING AND ASSESSING BY ORANGE COUNTY OF THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COST OF PAVING NORTH CAROLINA STATE ROAD #1195, ALSO KNOWN AS MEADOW LANE, IN CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA The property described below, the names of the owners of said property, the assessment levied against each parcel of property, the basis for the assessment levied against said parcel and the terms of payment of the assessment all set forth below, together with tax maps of the project, constitute the Assessment Roll for the paving of North Carolina State Road #1195, also known as Meadow Lane, in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina. BASIS FOR ASSESSMENT The basis for assessment against the property described below is frontage abutting the road at an equal rate per foot of frontage which represents the total local share of the cost of this project. TERMS OF PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT A. Within thirty (30) days after notice of the Confirmation of Assessment Roll is published, each owner of assessed property may pay his or her assessment in full without interest. B. Any assessment not paid in full as provided above shall be paid in five (5) equal annual installments with the first such installment, with interest, due sixty (60) days after the date 1 00 that the assessment roll is confirmed, and the remaining installments, with interest, due on the same date in each successive year until the assessment is paid in full. Map, Block Property Owners Amount of and Lot and Mailing Address Assessment Frontage 7. 111A. .2 Charles & Jackie Rector $ 1155.70 269.62 Rt. 4, 305 Rollingwood Rd. Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7. .111A. .5 David & Charlotte Lewis $ 881.76 205.71 Rt. 4, 200 Meadow Lane Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7. 111A. .6 George & Wanda Inscoe $ 364.35 85 202 Meadow Lane Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7. 111A. .7 Jack & Ann Mellott $ 471.50 110 Rt. 6, Box 93 Columbus, MD 39702 7 .111A. .8 David & Pamela Hayes $ 471.50 110 508 N. Channel Drive Wrightsville Beach, SC 28480 7.111A. .9 Thomas & Norma Bell $ 471.50 110 Rt. 4 , Box 208 Meadow Lane Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7.111A. .10 William & Agnes SteineL. $ 471.50 110 Rt. 4, Box 210 Meadow Lane Chapel Hill, NC 27514. 7 .111A. .11 Steve & Cedonia Edwards $ 471.50 110 Rt. 4, 212 Meadow Lane Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7 . 111A. .12 Daniel & Ila Stallings $ 561.52 131 10 Riverview Circle Granite Falls, NC 28630 7. 111A. .13 Johnnie Obie $ 857.28 200 Rt. 4, 213 Meadow Lane Chapel Hill, NC 27514 6 004 7.111A. .15 Pat Gallarelli $ 688.87 160.71. Rt. 4, 211 Meadow Lane Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7.111A. .16 Margaret Holmes $ 410.25 95.71 644 Massachusetts Ave. NE Washington, DC 20002 7. 111A. .16A Harrell Chotas $ 428.64 100 Rt. 4 207 Meadow Lane Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7.111A. .17 Robert & Fern Clark $ 428.64 100 Rt. 4, Box 205 Meadow Lane Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7. 111A. .17A Geddes Ramsey $ 428.64 100 Rt. 4, 203 Meadow Lane Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7.111A. .18 James & Kimberly Deloatch $ 857.28 200 Rt. 4 201 Meadow Lane Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7..111A.19 John & Karen Bryant $ 1093.76 255.17 Rt. 4, Box 312 Chapel Hill, NC 27514 oo The Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange, North Carolina, met in regular session in the old Post Off ice in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, the regular place of meeting, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. on June 17, 1986. Present: Absent: ****************************************************************** The Chair announced that this was the hour and day fixed by the Board of Commissioners for the public bearing on the Preliminary Assessment Roll filed with the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County pursuant to the direction of the Orange County Board of Commissioners and pursuant to the Board ' s decision to finance the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road #1195, also known as Meadow Lane, in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina. The Chair also announced that the Board of Commissioners would immediately hear anyone who might wish to be heard on the Preliminary Assessment Roll. Various persons appeared and were recognized and heard on the said Preliminary Assessment Roll. Those recognized and the essence of their comments were recorded by the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners in the minutes of the Board. • 1 00€ Thereupon, upon Motion of Commissioner seconded by Commissioner and carried, the Preliminary Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road #1195, also known as Meadow Lane, in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina, was confirmed The vote upon confirmation of the assessment made against each property owner was: Ayes: Noes: Upon motion of Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner , and unanimously approved, the Clerk to the Board was directed to enter into the minutes of the Board the confirmation date, hour, and minutes. Thereupon, the Clerk to the Board entered the confirmation effective o'clock p.m. , the 17th day of June, 1986. Upon motion of Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner , and unanimously approved, the Clerk to the Board was directed to deliver a copy of the confirmed Assessment Roll to the Orange County Tax Collector. Upon motion of Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner , and unanimously approved, the Orange County Tax Collector was directed to publish once, a Notice, no earlier than twenty (20) days from the date of confirmation as herein set forth, that the Assessment Roll for the financing by 2 OQ i Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road #1195, also known as Meadow Lane, located in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina, has been confirmed and that assessments may be paid without interest at any time before the expiration of thirty (30) days from the day that the Notice is published and that if not paid within that time, all installments thereof shall bear interest in an amount equal to the interest on past due ad valorem taxes in Orange County. The Chair directed that said Notice shall be published in the Durham Morning Herald. Said Notice shall be in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF CONFIRMATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE FINANCING BY ORANGE COUNTY OF THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COSTS OF PAVING NORTH CAROLINA STATE ROAD #1195, ALSO KNOWN AS MEADOW LANE, LOCATED IN CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Notice is hereby given that pursuant to Article 9 of Chapter 153A of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the Board of Commissioners of Orange County has confirmed the Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road #1195, also known as Meadow Lane, in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina, The specifics of any adjustment made are in the minutes of the Orange County Board of Commissioners for its meeting on , 1986. The confirmed Assessment Roll 3 • oo� reflects any adjustment. Pursuant thereto: 1. . The Board of Commissioners of the County of Orange, North Carolina, met in regular session in the old Post Office in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, at 7: 30 o'clock p.m. on June 17, 1986 . 2. The Chair announced that this was the hour and day fixed by the Board of Commissioners for the public hearing on the Preliminary Assessment Roll pursuant to the Board's decision to finance the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road #1195, also known as Meadow Lane, located in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina. 3. All persons attending and wishing to be heard were recognized by the Chair and were heard. 4. The Board confirmed the Assessment Roll and directed its delivery to the Orange County Tax Collector. 5. The assessments confirmed by the Board may be paid without interest at any time before the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of the publication of this Notice. If not paid within this time, all installments thereof shall bear interest at the rate set for past due Orange County ad valorem taxes. JOHN T. HORNER, Tax Collector for Orange County, N.C. I , Beverly Blythe, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for • 4 • 00e the County of Orange, North Carolina, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of so much of the proceedings of the Board of Commissioners for said County at a meeting held on June 17, 1986, as relates in any way to the confirmation of the Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road 41195, also known as Meadow Lane, located in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina. BEVERLY BLYTHE, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, N.C. [SEAL] 5 • 01 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I, Beverly Blythe, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that on or about June 6, 1986, I mailed, by first-class mail, postage prepaid, a Notice to each property owner of the public hearing to be held on the Preliminary Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County • of the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road 41195, also known as Meadow Lane, located in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina. The Notice mailed set the date and time of the public hearing and also the amount of assessment on the property owned by the person to whom the Notice was sent according to the county tax records. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, this the 6th day of June, 1986 . A:Ae44 le5r.4/Z4 BEVERLY BLYTHE, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of 11 . . Orange County, N.C. • (i O R A N G E C O U N T Y BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 011 • ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date JUNE 17. 19$6 Action Benda SUBJECT: R - Item , I T. OLLINGWOOD ROAD AND STALLINGS ROAD ASSESSMENT ROLL DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING , X lies No Attachment(s) Information Contact: SUSAN SMITH PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL CERTIFICATE OF MAILING Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 968-4501. PURPOSE: To receive public comment on the Preliminary Assessment Roll for Rollingwood Road (SR 1194) and Stallings Road (SR 1198) . To confirm the Final Assessment Roll for the project. NEED: Public input on the Preliminary Assessment Roll , filed with the Clerk to the Board and containing a tax description of each parcel of land to be assessed, the basis for the assessment, the amount assessed against each parcel of land, the terms of payment and the name of the owner of each parcel as can be ascertained from County tax records, is necessary to complete the program procedures for the project. The Clerk to the Board has filed a Certificate of Mailing which certifies that the notices of this public hearing and notices of individual assessments were mailed on or before June 6, 1986 . The amount to be assessed includes the local share of the construction costs and project administrative costs. The combined total specified on the adopted Assessment Resolution is $20,768 .63 . IMPACT: Upon close of the public hearing and confirmation of the Assessment Roll for the Meadow Lane project, the Board can direct that the Assessment Roll be delivered to the Orange County Tax Collector for collection. , RECOMMENDATION: Confirm the Assessment Roll . Accept the Certificate of Mailing offered by the Clerk . Direct the Tax Collector to collect the assessment. TOTAL LOCAL SHARE : $20f768..63 TOTAL FRONTAGE: 4665.47 ASSESSMENT RATE: $4.4516/FOOT o1 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FINANCING AND ASSESSING BY ORANGE COUNTY OF THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COST OF PAVING NORTH CAROLINA STATE ROAD (S) #1194 AND #1198, ALSO KNOWN AS ROLLINGWOOD ROAD AND STALLINGS ROAD, IN CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA The property described below, the names of the owners of said property, the assessment levied against each parcel of property, the basis for the assessment levied against said parcel and the terms of payment of the assessment all set forth below, together with tax maps of the project, constitute the Assessment Roll for the paving of North Carolina. State Road (s) #1194 and #1198, also known as Rollingwood Road and Stallings Road , in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina, BASIS FOR ASSESSMENT The basis for assessment against the property described below is frontage abutting the road at an equal rate per foot of frontage which represents the total local share of the cost of this project. TERMS OF PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT A. Within thirty (30) days after notice of the Confirmation of Assessment Roll is published, each owner of assessed property may pay his or her assessment in full without interest. B. Any assessment not paid in full as provided above shall be paid in five (5) equal annual installments with the first such installment, with interest, due sixty (60) days after the date o1 that the assessment roll is confirmed, and the remaining installments, with interest, due on the same date in each successive year until the assessment is paid in full. Map, Block Property Owners Amount of and Lot and Mailing Address Assessment Frontage 7. 111B. .4 Sara Young $ 329.64 74.05 101 Rollingwood Drive Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7. 111B. .5 Helen & Vernon Worley $ 489.68 110 Rt. 4 Rollingwood Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7. 111B. .6 Helen & Vernon Worley $ 489.68 110 Rt. 4 Rollingwood Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7. 111B. .7 Helen & Vernon Worley $ 4.89.68 110 Rt. 4 Rollingwood Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7. 111B. .8 William, &• Pamela Brennen $ 489.68 110 2 Brisbane Drive Chapel Hill4 NC 27514 7. 111B. .9 Gustavo & Charlene Fernandez $ 489.68 110 109 Rollingwood Rd. Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7. 111B. .10 Elizabeth Lackey $ 489.68 110 Joseph Buckner 214 W. Rosemary Street Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7. 111B. .11 Daniel & Davey Stallings $ 476.81 107.11 Rt. 4, Box 16 Granite Falls, NC 28630 7. 1118. .12 Richard & Sara Phillips $ 445.16 100 Box 2351 Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7 . 1118. .13 Delma & Ann Register $ 445.16 100 207 Rollingwood Road Chapel Hill, NC 27514 L___ 014 7. 111B. .15 Doyle & Frances Smith $ 896.47 201.38 301 Rollingwood Road Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7. 111B. .17 Ronald & Millie Holmes $ 1481.45 332.79 300 Rollingwood Road Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7. 111B. .18 Victor & Gail Benoit $ 1458.17 327.56 204 Rollingwood Road Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7. 1118. .19 David & Joanne Drake $ . 651.23 146.29 P.O. Box 904 Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7 . 111B. .20 Allen & Marquita Barker $ 704.83 158.33 200 Rollingwood Road Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7 . 111B. .21 Richard & Kathy Sparrow $ 489.68 110 100 Keith Lane Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7 . 111B. .22 Richard & Joan Ward $ 467.42 105 104 Rollingwood Road Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7 . 111B. .23 Richard & Joan Ward $ 467.42 105 104 Rollingwood Road Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7 . 111B. .24 Anthony & Betty Moore $ 467.42 105 102 Huckleberry Drive Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7 . 111B. .25 Rufus & Sara Lee $ 639.60 143.68 100 Rollingwood Road Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7 . 111B. .26 Ann Brinkhous• $ 445.16 100 Rt. 4 111 Stallings Rd. Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7 . 111B. .27 Mary Garner $ 445.16 100 100 Howell Lane - Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7. 111B. .28 William Bunch $ 445.16 100 P.O. Box 3678 Chapel Hill, NC 27514 015 7. 111B, .29 Warren & Alberta Via $ 445.16 100 307 Clayton Road Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7. 1118. .30 Ronald & Madeline Goldstein $ 445.16 100 Box 716 Carrboro, NC 27510 7 . 111B. .31 Thomas & Rhonda Cheek $ 658.35 147.89 101 Stallings Road Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7. 111B. .32 Charlie & Tammie Bynum $ 316.07 71 Rt. 4 Box 100 Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7.1 111B. .33 Cynthia Kromer $ 481.67 108.2 102 Stallings Road Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7. 111B. .34 Arlene Smart $ 481.67 108.2 104 Stallings Road Rt. 4 Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7. 111B. .35 Mary Garner $ 481.67 108.2 100 Howell Lane Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7 . 111B. .36 Mary Garner $ 481.67 108.2 100 Howell Lane Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7. 111B. .37 Deborah Beauchaine $ 721.16 162 110 Stallings Road Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7 . 111A. .1 Frederick & Carolyn Merricks $ 445.16 100 Rt. 4, Box 426C Chapel Hill , NC 27514 7. 111A. .2 Charles & Jackie Rector $ 885.34 198.88 Rt. 4, 305 Rollingwood Rd. Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7. 111A. .3 Bobby & Kay Crissman $ 445.16 100 302 Rollingwood Road Chapel Hill, NC 27514 01E 7 . 111A. .4 Bobby & Sylvia Crissman $ 390.36 87.69 302 Rollingwood Road Chapel Hill, NC 27514 7. 111A. .5 David & Charlotte Lewis. $ 396.29 89.02 Rt. 4 200 Meadow Lane Chapel Hill, NC 27514 4 o' The Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange, North Carolina, met in regular session in the old Post Office in Chapel Hill, North Carolina , the regular place of meeting, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. on June 17, 1986. Present: Absent: **************************.*.**.*.***********R y****Iry y n"y *****************1. The Chair announced that this was the hour and clay fixed by the Board of Commissioners for the public hearing on the Preliminary Assessment Roll filed with the Clerk to the Board of Ccmmissioners of Orange County pursuant to the direction of the Orange County Board of Commissioners and pursuant to the Board' s de•.ision to finance the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road (s) #1194 and #1198 , also known as Rollingwood Read and Stallings Road, in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina. The Chair also announced that the Board of Commissioners would immediately hear anyone who might wish to be h=-rd on the Preliminary Assessment Roll. Various persons appeared and were recognized and heard on the said Preliminary Assessment Roll. Those recognized and the essence of their ceimments were recorded by the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners it the minutes of the Board. 1 _ 01E Thereupon, upon Motion of Commissioner seconded by Commissioner and carried, the Preliminary Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road (s) #1194 and #1198 , also known as Rollingwood Road and Stallings Road, in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina, was confirmed The vote upon confirmation of the assessment made against each property owner. was: Ayes: Noes: Upon motion of Commissioner T, seconded by Commissioner _ , and unanimously approved, the Clerk to the Board was directed to enter into the minutes of the Board the confirmation date, hour, and minutes. Thereupon, the Clerk to the Board entered the confirmation effective o'clock p.m. , the 17th day of June, 1986. Upon motion of Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner , and unanimously approved, the Clerk to the Board was directed to deliver a copy of the confirmed Assessment Roll to the Orange County Tax Collector. Upon motion of Commissioner , seconded by • Commissioner , and unanimously approved, the Orange County Tax Collector was directed to publish once, a Notice, no earlier than twenty (20) days from the date of confirmation as 2 t • 01° herein set forth, that the Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road (s) #1194 and #1198 , also known as Rollingwood Road and Stallings Road, located in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina, has been confirmed and that assessments may be paid without interest at any time before the expiration of thirty (30) days from the day that the Notice is published and that if not paid within that time, all installments thereof shall bear interest in an amount equal to the interest on past due ad valorem taxes in Orange County. The Chair directed that said Notice shall be published in the Durham Morning Herald . Said Notice shall be in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF CONFIRMATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE FINANCING BY ORANGE COUNTY OF THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COSTS OF PAVING NORTH CAROLINA STATE ROAD (S) #1194 AND #1198, ALSO KNOWN AS ROLLINGWOOD ROAD AND STALLINGS ROAD, LOCATED IN CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Notice is hereby given that pursuant to Article 9 of Chapter 153A of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the Board of Commissioners of Orange County has confirmed the Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road (s) #1194 and #1198, also known as Rollingwood Road and Stallings Road, in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina, . The specifics 3 02C of any adjustment made are in the minutes of the Orange County Board of Commissioners for its meeting on , 1986. The confirmed Assessment Roll reflects any adjustment. Pursuant thereto: 1. The Board of Commissioners of the County of Orange, North Carolina, met in regular session in the old Post Office in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, at 7:30 o'clock p.m_ on June 17 , 1986. 2. The Chair announced that this was the hour and day fixed by the Board of Commissioners for the public hearing on the r y Assessment P eliminar As e t Roll pursuant to the Board's decision to finance the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road (s) #1194 and #1198, also known as Rollingwood Road and Stallings Road, located in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina. 3. All persons attending and wishing to be heard were recognized by the Chair and were heard. 4. The Board confirmed the Assessment Roll and directed its delivery to the Orange County Tax Collector. 5. The assessments confirmed by the Board may be paid without interest at any time before the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of the publication of this Notice. If not paid 4 021. within this time, all installments thereof shall bear interest at the rate set for past due Orange County ad valorem taxes. JOHN T. HORNER, Tax Collector for Orange County, N.C. I, Beverly Blythe, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange, North Carolina, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of so much of the proceedings of the Board of Commissioners for said County at a meeting held on June 17, 1986, as relates in any way to the confirmation of the Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road (s) #1194 and #1198, also known as Rollingwood Road and Stallings Road, located in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina. • riS BEVERLY BLYTHE, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, N.C. [SEAL] 5 02 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I , Beverly Blythe, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that on or about June 6, 1986, I mailed, by first-class mail, postage prepaid, a Notice to each property owner of the public hearing to be held on the Preliminary Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road (s) #1194 and #1198, also known as Rollingwood Road and Stallings Road, located in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina. The Notice mailed set the date and time of the public hearing and also the amount of assessment on the property owned by the person to whom the Notice was sent according to the county tax records. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, this the 6th day of June, 1986 . /41.44 /54;;,,eko BEVERLY BLYTHE, is Clerk to the Board of l Commissioners of Orange County, N.C. G �{ ORANGE COUNTY U i BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agenda ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Item No. (j25 Meeting Date: JUNE 17, 1986 SUBJECT: RESOLUTION REQUESTING IMPACT FEES LEGISLATION DEPARTMENT: COUNTY MANAGER PUBLIC HEARING: X Yes No ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: MANAGER'S OFFICE NONE TELEPHONE NUMBER: Hillsborough - 732-8181 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 Mebane - 227-2031 Durham - 688-7331 PURPOSE: To consider adopting a resolution requesting special legislation . in the 1986 Session of the General Assembly to enable the County to establish a system of Impact Fees. NEED: The Planning Board, Planning Staff and Board of Commissioners have expressed the desire and need to incorporate impact fees into the planning process countywide. In addition, to accommo- date the Carrboro Land Use Ordinance and the Chapel Hill Land Development Ordinance and the Chapel Hill Land Development Ordinance it will be necessary for impact fee authority to be in place in the joint planning area. Impact fees are mechanisms in which the new development share's the public cost associated with demands and burdens placed on public service delivery systems create by the new development. In essence, impact fees are designed to help defray the costs of expanding public faci- lities. 'A/draft of the bill was provided to the Board in the June 5, 1986 agenda. CO'-'1MENDATION: As the Board decides. 024 ORANGE COUNTY Action Agenda BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Item No.'l ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT MEETING DATE June 17, 1986 Subject: Telephone Task Force Reports Department: . Public Hearing: Yes X no County Manager's Office Attachments: Information Contact: Ken Thompson Extension 502 Phone Numbers: 732-8181, 968-4501, 227-0231 PURPOSE: To consider findings and recommendations on the Centel digital switch installation, and to discuss the responses of the three telephone companies (AT&T, Centel and General Telephone) to the County's complaint regarding long distance telephone service. NEED: Richard Helwig, Chair of the3ask Torce,will make the presentation. Copies of the reports are included in folder which accompanies the agenda. RECOMMENDATION: As the Board decides. ORANGE COUNTY Action Agenda BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS it No. 2,„, ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT MEE'T'ING DATE June 17, 1986 Subject: Eubanks Landfill Usage Complaint Department: County Manager's Office Public Hearing: Yes % no Attachments: Information Contact: Ken Thompson Phone Numbers: 732-8181, 968-4501, 227-0231, extension 502 PURPOSE: To receive a report from the Manager on the nature and reasons for early hour usage of the Landfill by public agencies. REED: A questionnaire was sent to the Chapel Hill Public Works Department, Orange County Public Works Department and to the University's Facilities Department to ascertain the answers to several questions regarding the waste material they are depositing. A summary of this information will be available by the time of Board's regular meeting. RECOMMENDATION: O2€ ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AG $$A ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NO. /1 MEETING DATE JUNE 17, 1986 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF LETTER TO BE SENT TO NC UTILITIES COMMISSION *************; ********************************************************* DEPARTMENT: PURCHASING & CENTRAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEARING YES X NO ************************************************************************** ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: PAM JONES LETTER EXT 497 PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH 732-8181 HILLSBOROUGH 732-9361 CHAPEL HILL 967-9251 MEBANE 227-2031 DURHAM 688-7331 ************************************************************************** PURPOSE: To consider approving a letter prepared for the NC Utilities Commission requesting a study of costs associated with the extended area service (EAS) being explored for Durham, Chapel Hill and Hillsborough. NEED: The Utilities Commission will conduct cost studies only at the request of groups that are deemed to represent the public at large. Orange County, the entity officially spearheading the EAS effort, will be joined in their request for costs by the University of North Carolina, Duke University, Memorial Hospital, Chapel Hill-Carrboro Schools, the Town of Hillsborough, and the Town of Carrboro to name only a few. IMPACT: The receipt of these letters by the Utilities Commission will allow them to initiate procedures that will yield cost per subscriber, both residential and business. This information in turn can be used in the campaign for extended area service. RECOMMENDATION: To approve the letter addressed to the Utilities Commission and authorize the Chairman to sign on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners. 0 2 I ORANGE COUNTY COM/VIISSIONERS 106 EAST MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGH, N. C. 27278 MORES CAREY BEN LLOYD BARLEY E.MARSHALL NORMAN WALKER June 17, 1986 DON W7LLHOIT North Carolina Utilities Commission Raleigh, North Carolina To the Utilities Commission Members: On behalf of the Orange County Board of County Commissioners, I hereby request a study to be made of the costs that could be entailed on a per subscriber basis were extended area service to be approved for parts of Orange County. Such information is necessary to explore the feasibility of an extended area telephone service connecting Durham, Chapel Hill and Hillsborough. While Orange County would be greatly benefited by the toll-free calling area, we believe that ir1!i'ormation relevant to the cost of this service should be made available as a prerequisite to the feasibility study. .. It is the t*Tstailding of this=-`Board this itequatit, Opresents no corn mitmert � i��a" any otsliga#.�on ttr� � ` extended '� , creates area servi ,t ther wilt... atigo to obtji.L fuif . 4nformation concerning:;� i ' :.desig ated a� w ".i Your coop ation-is appreciated. :' 9,. ly;4 - r+ Don Willhoit Chairman, Orange County Board of Commissioners /bab File ORANGE COUNTY O2 E BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AG A ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NO. MEETING DATE JUNE 17, 1986 SUBJECT: DISPOSAL OF PROPERTY FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT *********************************************************************** DEPARTMENT: PURCHASING & CENTRAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEARING YES __XNO ************************************************************************** ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: PAM JONES BID TABULATION Ext. 497 MAP OF PROPERTY DISPOSAL PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH 732-8181 HILLSBOROUGH 732-9361 CHAPEL HILL 967-9251 MEBANE 227-2031 DURHAM 688-7331 ************************************************************************** PURPOSE: To consider bids for surplus property being disposed of by Community Development. NEED: The Community Development Program no longer utilizes nor intends to utilize in the future, the two mobile homes and a lot on Riddle Avenue. The lot and mobile home located on Riddle Avenue was acquired during the Community Development activities in Northern Fairview as a part of the property acquisition process. The mobile home located in the Councilville Community was purchased in December, 1983 to provide a site office for Orange County Community Develop- ment staff. Since the Councilville project is in the process of being closed out, the staff has moved from this site to the Chapel Hill Section 8 -:office in the Old Police Building. The property was advertised as provided in G.S. 160A-26B, sealed bids were solicited and opened at 3:00 p.m. , May 8, 1986, a tabulation of which is attached. This process contains no provision for an upset bid. The property was advertised twice in both the Durham and Chapel Hill Newspapers, in addition to a general solicitation of mobile home sales organizations and park owners. IMPACT: Funds deposited to the Community Development program income account will be $1702.65 for the mobile homes and $3500 for the lot if bids are awarded. RECOMMENDATION: Award bid to Mr. Jack Payne for the 12' x 56' mobile home FOR A SUM OF $500; Mrs. Janet Thomas for the 12 ' x 60 ' mobile home for a sum of $1202.65; allowing the security deposits on each to be used as a part of the bid price; and to authorize the Director of Purchasing to release titles on mobile homes to parties indicated above. Reject bid for land due to disparity between bid price and its appraised value and authorize the Director of Purchasing to advertise for rebid using the public auction upset bid method as provided in the General Statutes. BID •TA13U1•ATION FOR OFFICE USE: BID FOR: aD D 5P0.5'n U BID AWARDED TO: CLOSING DATE: /( 4yr $ J9f36 BID PRICE: CLOSING TIME: o P-m . BUDGETED AMOUNT:- N L.e�.-� Trc�.�:Cc.� Tr�c�.�s Arnoun�-oi- • on . �9 ob . NOTE THIS PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD ZONE. 0 RIDDLE AVENUE S01°06'06"f E}.P._ 13r, TO OLD - — - `— 0.0 0, CEDAR GR()VE ROAD L } JAMIC1= 01311E •�° 0,3 0 �Iy THOMAS JOHNSON LANDS ° °�' °'� LANDS m 100.09' I.P CONTROL CORNER -- — E.I.P. F JAMES FREELAND , l-ANDS OAR SCALE p 50' 25' 0 FINAL PLAT Cv PIIOP[RTT OF= yp �" LARRY DAVE {r HILLSBORO TWP. ORANGE CO., N.C. TCK! R k..,, '.i._•+ �va r� l._-� ._..., LHIr:�.. +R . p *. C.B�Irf f" 50' RFH oxtrxo. °tTi APRIL 1902 r /� - aj.� ,' L OWN f �ra.r r=:a �......, .. EA HILLS$ R r�arn a O.N.C. DALE D.FAULKNER R L S L-2176 THE JOHN R. McADA.MS COMPANY INC. 1 ..,, P.O.IOk im 100 laE HOCILON10 I CHAPEL NILL.N,C,1M1t ♦ - H11)661-1016 ,w_.-...�.......v. _,,...� -'h.'�' �''�{i.:i:L�i Y.,'.':d.; 1 x �' _ - ..•:.Jk. t.'.: t r r- T r lr +� ORANGE COUNTY 031 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NO. n; MEETING DATE JUNE 17, 1986 SUBJECT: AWARD BID FOR 38 YARD PACKER UNIT *********************************************************************** DEPARTMENT: PURCHASING & CENTRAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEARING YES _X NO ************************************************************************** ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: PAM JONES Bid Tabulation EXT 497 PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH 732-8181 HILLSBOROUGH 732-9361 CHAPEL HILL 967-9251 MEBANE 227-2031 DURHAM 688-7331 ************************************************************************** PURPOSE: To consider awarding a bid to Carolina Waste Systems for a 38 yard LoDal packer unit. NEED: At the request of the Public Works Director, the packer unit was bid. Eight vendors were solicited with three responding. A tabulation of these is attached. According to General Statutes this purchase requires Board of Commissioner approval. The packer intended for replacement is a 36 yard Dempsey Dumpster which is 11 years old and has already been refurbished once approximately five years ago. This unit is currentlyin total disrepair and is in need of immediate replacement. It is planned that the new packer body purchased from this bid will be placed on a 1981 White truck, which had a major overhaul in 1985 and continues to be extremely serviceable with only normal maintenance. Since normal packer life is approximately five to seven years, the truck and the packer life expectancy will coincide. IMPACT: The budgetary impact will be $32,675 for the new packer unit. The County purchased a complete new sanitation unit in 1984 for $77,981; $26,564 represented the cost of the packer. Since the bid to LoDal ($32,675) includes packer and installation on our existing cab & chassis, the monetary outlay is somewhat minimized. Outlay is further reduced when purchase cost of a new unit is set against cost of repairs to the current packer unit and the down-time its continued operation in the County would produce. RECOMMENDATION: Award bid for one (1) 38 yard packer unit at $32,675 net cost (includes $1000 trade in) to Carolina Waste Systems, Hamlet, North Carolina. ij 13111 'I•A13Ul.A'T:LON FOR OFFICE USE: BID FOR: '(r l!c ��' �C �C cr. !cr . BID AWARDED TO: CLOSING DATE: 5-- iq -s, BID PRICK: CLOSING TIME: 'c o f? of . _ BUDGETED AMOUNT: ,17 �Gr7r 'GI V Qf F3►A flns�.+ T�� 1n�Cuc{.�d.� Dell vt"d r AoeV -{-F-.t 3'?) ';4 s 7e' F'tv 3r �4tALt1Lr� C,e �;[�,u �tl CZ PLD35— Ltqo 500 36 V,04 JZ 0 Fuu. PAC 03L ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agenda ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Item No. r4 Meeting Date: JUNE 18, 1986 SUBJECT: ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT--SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY DEPARTMENT: COUNTY MANAGER PUBLIC HEARING: Yes X No ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: MANAGER'S OFFICE, X501 AGREEMENT TELEPHONE NUMBER: Hillsborough - 732-8181 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 Mebane - 227-2031 Durham - 688-7331 PURPOSE: To consider executing an encroachment agreement with Southern Railway Company. NEED: County engineers, Hazen and Sawyer, for the Efland Sewer Project has requested and received an encroachment agreement from Southern Railway. The agreement allows the County to install an 8-inch sewer pipeline upon the right-of-way of Southern Railway along Forrest Road in Efland. IMPACT: Encroachment agreement is required to construct Phace C of the Efland Sewer Project. In the event the sewer line at this location is not installed, the agreement should be void. The agreement stipulates the County will pay a one-time fee of $50. 00 and $240. 00 per annum. Sewer revenues would cover the annual rental fee. RECOMMENDATION(S) : Approve execution of encroachment agreement with Southern Railway. WJ = - r x-�L � :;% + .- - - ;'su u1ry �' S $:j•i? - ' y - ie r , -':''''L-- :1:11:A.:',..-Z:= ':-'" Z-==c,-",- "%of,-2Z--;: -. ..1.42:.--'1.-- -. ,-T--:2' -.=•' L' ""2-11.Ame:-'".--f-'...: :.,,'rfie444-7;4f,r' 1-- •:-.-:: _ ..iv,A, ,,, _,,, 034 IT IS AGREED between • SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, a Virginia corporation, hereinafter styled Company; and COUNTY OF ORANGE, a municipal corporation of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter styled Licensee: 1. Company grants unto Licensee, insofar as its title enables it so to do, the license, as a personal privilege and not transferable without the written consent of Company, to construct and maintain a 8-inch sewer pipe line crossing along, across and upon the right of way or property (hereinafter called "property") of Company, at or near EFLAND, North Carolina; the li aforementioned installation, hereinafter called "Facility", being that identified and located substantially as shown on annexed print of Drawing I marked Exhibit A (furnished by Licensee). Licensee will pay the sum of $50.00. as a consideration for the license hereby granted. Licensee ($ 240.00) Cper aannum, payabiei annually in advance. Licensee further agrees to reimburse Company, upon bill rendered, for any and all expenses which may be incurred by Company, resulting from or in connection with any such special engineering studies, field supervision or flagging protection as Company may find necessary to perform in connection with the installation or maintenance of said Facility. 2. Licensee will construct and maintain Facility, at its expense, in such manner as will not interfere with operations of Company or endanger persons or property of Company, and in accordance with (a) plans and specifications (if any) shown on said print and any other specifications reasonably prescribed by Company, (b) applicable regulations prescribed by statute or by governmental authority, and (c) applicable specifications adopted by the Association of American Railroads when not in conflict with plans, specifications or regulations mentioned in (a) and (b) above. Licensee shall give the Division Superintendent of Company at least 72 hours' advance notice of Licensee's intention to begin construction of said Facility. Licensee will, at its expense, make such changes in location, grade or construction of Facility, as may be, at any time, required by Company. 3. Whenever cathodic protection is installed, Licensee will notify Company prior to its being placed in service in order that tests may be conducted on Company's signal and communications systems for possible interference. If said Facility causes degradation of the signal or communications facilities of Company, Licensee, at its expense, will relocate the cathodic protection and/or provide such necessary protection and/or corrective equipment as may be necessary to eliminate said interference to the satisfaction of Company. This provision applies to the existing signal and communications equipment of Company and to any said signal or communications equipment which Company may install in the future. 4. If Facility endangers or interferes with operations of Company, or if Licensee is in default hereunder and does not remedy such default or condition after notice by Company so to do, this license may be revoked by Company and Licensee shall, at its expense, upon written notice by Company, and in any event upon termination of this agreement by either party as hereinafter provided, remove Facility from Company's property and restore said property to its condition existing prior to construction of Facility. If Licensee fails to remove Facility. Company may do so at Licensee's expense. 1 If an emergency arises which in Company's judgment requires immediate repairs to Facility, Licensee will, upon request, do the necessary work, or failing so to do, Company may make such repairs at Licensee's expense. 5. Said Facility shall be constructed and maintained at the sole risk of Licensee and Licensee agrees, without regard to negligence on the part 03 of Company or any other corporation controlling, controlled by or under common control with Company, to save Company or any other corporation controlling, g. ; controlled by or under common control with Company, wholly harmless from and against all claims, damages, expenses and liability (whether or not such liability has been judicially determined) for loss of life, personal injury or damage to property, resulting from or in any manner attributable to the construction, maintenance, use, operation or presence of the Facility, or to the presence of the equipment or employees of Licensee, on Company's property. 6. This agreement shall take effect as of the day of , 19_, and may be terminated by either party hereto at any time by 60 days' written notice to the other of such termination. EXECUTED in duplicate, each part being an original, as of the day of , 19 SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, COUNTY OF ORANGE, By ORANGE, NORTH CAROLINA, By Vice President. - Title. JMA:jhs 4-4-86 74549 DOC. 8738K - 2 - 03 ; -_.. _._. . ..., z.c. .., a -,_ i. 1, wc,-3.4v.-_--- -._- - 7 ', 0 c_. , wi .3g r------ 7�3 • } ,,,, . .M � ° 'G3 .s-r-6, .+0.4.55c a1 CS d -7'1\li K10 % 0 SSs° 3.,1 a3,I '° r---a 3s3. IS' .ay 8¢ .S� �1 ze�' 1 �- I 1 N % II KP 12.,=•p- -11 k7M ,.. :V/,,1 N o . U. zCd- a ti If 1+per • ii - -(Ga L.14.1� eD, �-r4 �A tJ c Fe:igge r gp. (S 12 1372 ) - L d e C- - _ - - -- •- _ ----Fe line gt?d.-.Cxossi f -tc9 j :e-inst rl --- - : -- _ _and maintained 1n ac Qr an h ---- - --� - c�.pit Lstest e:pprnved CAN-tAirwA�r_1- - _ F_-- 1 _-.•• __. -_ --. •. ..._. ____-_ -- --12NGI ING ASSO IA,TI N!•S-especiii•zatioii-9 -. __1_. �-._. _ -: t.or.t?i 1 Y � amm .7.a- �,P ��'_.. ___�.�_. .__ ! r�Q l Pekines for Come in -- --} CQ_ L_._. ._-__ ifo•n=fraaiwaFf __Substanees--a- --•4 -.1.- _t = .35'x. -! t - - - �p�r -- - ' - - - r. FF_ tt-1.1-- -�4$ ___ --- - [,4- i� __-__- _ _ - Gl i ' 1 .t`- a i r �� �� - i -- --_- -- - er^ t.. - -° - ' ---- . - _ .-. -. -_ -_.W_µ_ _- ._ -_ __ 1 , -._.__- T-_�_..___ •_ -- .-_- _._. _ L 1 . 03 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGgy ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NO. MEETING DATE JUNE 17, 1986 SUBJECT: FIREWORKS DISPLAY AT KENAN STADIUM *********************************************************************** DEPARTMENT: COUNTY MANAGER PUBLIC HEARING YES _X_NO ************************************************************************** ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: MANAGER'S OFFICE PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH 732-8181 HILLSBOROUGH 732-9361 CHAPEL HILL 967-9251 MEBANE 227-2031 DURHAM 688-7331 ************************************************************************** PURPOSE: To consider authorizing a permit for a public exhibition of fireworks to take place on July 4, 1986 at Kenan Stadium. NEED: As in years past, the Chapel Hill Kiwanis Club is requesting approval of the Board of County Commissioners for a July 4 fireworks display in Kenan Stadium. The event will be monitored by both Police and Fire Departments of the Town. While the question of insurance has been raised with each applicant, safety certification is all that the County has required before issuing the permits. With the increase in the number and awarded judgements on law suits, it appears prudent to also require evidence that the application has general liability insurance to cover the event. This precedent was set with the action taken by the Board in November, 1985, which required those conducting the display to provide evidence of $1 million in general liability coverage, naming the County as an additional insured. IMPACT: Coverage would protect the public, the applicant, the owner of the site and the County which is authorizing the event to take place. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the permit for the exhibition with the provision that proper evidence of general liability insurance be delivered to the Orange County Purchasing Director by Friday, June 27, 1986. Insurance to name Orange County as an additional insured. ORANGE COUNTY D 3 C BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NO.R; MEETING DATE June 17, 1986 SUBJECT: Demolition, Lot Clearing and Hauling Services Contract Award DEPARTMENT: Housing & Community Dev. PUBLIC HEARING: -YES X NO ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: Tara likes l- Results of Bid Opening PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH - 732-8181 HILLSBOROUGH - 732-9361 2- Agreement CHAPEL Hill - 967-9251 MEBANE -- 227-2031 DURHAM - 688-7331 PURPOSE: To consider awarding the -Demolition Contract for the Councilville Community Development Project. NEED: Clearance of dilapidated structures and unburied decaying refuse is a Community Development activity outlined in the Councilville Community Development Grant. All families residing in dilapidated housing have been relocated to standard dwellings in the Chapel Hill/Carrboro area. Sealed bids were opened on June 2, 1986. The bids were as follows: Contractor- R.W. Jones Grading & Hauling Company, 320 West Corbin Street, Hillsborough, NC, 27278. Bid Amount- $7,900.00 Contractor- Morrow Construction Company, Route 2, Box 391, Mebane, NC, 27302. Bid Amount- $16,395.00 Contractor- Stonewall Rental, Inc. , Route 4, Box 506, Chapel Hill, NC 27514. Bid Amount- $11,900.00 IMPACT: Demolition of all dilapidated structures will eliminate an obvious blighting influence on the area. Removal of all un- buried refuse will also eliminate blight as well as prevent any potential health problems. RECOMMENDATION(S) : Award contract to the lowest responsible bidder which is: Contractor- R.W. Jones Grading & Hauling Company 320 West Corbin Street Hillsborough, NC 27278 Contract has been forwarded to the County Attorney for review. RESULTS OF BID OPENING 034 OWNER: Orange County APPLICATION NUMBER: 1 ADDRESS: 300 W. Tryon Street COST ESTIMATE: Sg,,pn_no PERCENTAGE OF BID OVER UNDER 3.66 COST ESTIMATE CHECK ONE: JOB BID K JOB NEGOTIATED COMPANY BID AMOUNT 1. R.W. Jones Grading & Hauling Company $7,900.00 2. Morrow Construction Company 16,395.00 3. Stonewall Rentals, Inc. $11,900.00 4. 5. Bids opened by: Glenn Davis Time of Bid Opening: 10:00 a.m. Date of Bid Opening: June 2, 1986 Witnessed by: Donna Galloway *************************************************************************** Lowest Acceptable Bid: $7,900.00 Negotiated Amount: N/A Contractor: R.W. Jones Grading & Hauling Company NAME 320 West Corbin Street, Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 ADDRESS 732-2739 or 732-3356 TELEPHONE NUMBER COMMENTS: Submitted by: �pu,,, DATE � � „ [c2 K, 7 Bid Approved by: Proceed Order: Issued COMMENTS: CONTRACT . .. • for Demolition, Lot Clearing and Hauling Services 4 in the • between and THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of • , 19 , by and between , (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor") • and Orange County, North Carolina, (hereinafter referred to as "County"). WITNESSTH : THAT WHEREAS, the County is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution-of a Community- Development Project; and WHEREAS, in order for the County to implement part of the overall pro- gram, professional demolition, lot clearing and hauling services are necessary; and WHEREAS, the County desires to engage the Contractor to render such pro- fessional services in connection with such undertakings of the County; and NOW, THEREFORE, the Contractor and the County by mutual agreement for the consideration hereinafter set forth, do hereby agree as follows : 041 SECTION I: SCOPE OF SERVICES THAT the Contractor shall furnish all labor, materials, equipment, super- vision and services required to perform professional demolition, lot clearance and hauling services in connection with the County's demolition and-loot clear- ance program in the Community Development Target Area as follows: (A) DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURES - This service includes the demolition of each of the vacant dilapidated structures which the County has identified by narrative location description in Exhibit A and graphically located on the locator map (s) which is marked as Exhibit B. Both Exhibits A and B are attached hereto and made a part of this agreement. For the purposes of this agreement and the services which are to be pro- vided by the Contractor, the term "Structures" means the former principal resi- dence and other appurtenant structures such as garages, sheds, privies, or animal pens so identified by County. It is to be expressly understood by the Contractor that this demolition work includes any and all portions of the structure which is demolished includ- ing any footings, foundation materials and structural supports. In connection with this demolition work it shall also be the Contractor's responsibility to fill any openings resulting from septic tanks, wells or privies which are located within the property occupied by the structure. (B) CLEARANCE OF LOTS, REMOVAL OF DEBRIS AND HAULING - This service includes the clearing and removal from the property of the following types of materials which the County has identified by a narrative location description in Exhibit A and graphically located on the locator map (s) which is marked as Exhibit B: -2- 04; 1 . The debris which results from the demolition outlines! in A above as well as debris remaining from any previous open controlled burning which may have been conducted by the County prior to this agreement. This debris shall include any contents of the structures which are demolished. 2. Any accumulated trash, scrap metal and junk within the property, in- cluding any abandoned stoves, refrigerators, building/construction materials, and other such miscellaneous debris, particularly that which constitutes a health or fire hazard and may serve as a breed- ing place to harbor insects, rodents, snakes, pets, vermin or wild animals, and/or give off an offensive odor which constitutes a nuisance. For the purpose of this agreement, "Trash' shall mean any broken tree limbs, leaves or branches, any garbage or refuse, any discarded or worthless material that might conceal pools of water or create breeding grounds for mosquitoes or other insects, any waste any discarded metal , paper, wood, glass or cloth. 3. Any and all weeds, uncultivated vegetation and noxious growth within the property which has not been marked/identified for saving by the County prior to the clearance work. This service shall be performed by mowing the designated area(s) to a high of 4 inches or less, and excavating only when it is deemed necessary by the County. Any area that has been excavated shall be cultivated, reseeded with grass and covered with straw. It is to be expressly understood that the services to be performed under this agreement are for the purpose of leaving the area within the property in a pleasing ecological and aesthetic:condition. • -3- 04' . SECTION II: TIME OF:COMPLETION THAT the Contractor agrees to start the demolition, lot clearance and hauling services outlined in SECTION I of this Contract upon receipt of a written Proceed Order from the County and will be satisfactorily completed within ) working days after the date specified in the Proceed Order as the beginning time for the demolition, lot clearance and hauling services. In the event unforeseen delays cause this performance deadline to be ex- ceeded, the County and the Contractor shall establish a mutually agreeable extension which shall be negotiated and incorporated as an addendum to this agreement. This is of the essence, and it is agreed that any delay beyond the time specified for completion stipulated herein shall result in the Contractor being charged wfth liquidated damages for delay in the sum of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) a day for each day beyond the time'limit agreed upon. SECTION III: CONTRACT AMOUNT THAT for the services rendered under SECTION I of this Contract by the Contractor, the County shall pay the Contractor a sum of $ ( Dollars and Cents) upon the completion of the services described in this Contract. There will be a 10% retaining fee for the 60 day inspection, which will be held 60 days after the final inspection. This payment shall be made to the Contractor by the County subject to a joint inspection of the work sites by the County and the Contractor to insure adequate performance of the provisions of this agreement and the receipt of an appropriate invoice from the Contractor. In the event unforeseen circumstances result in the County desiring an addition or deduction of services which changes the contract amount hereabove, a mutually agreeable written addendum to change the contract sum shall be negotiated and incorporated into this agreement. -4- SECTION IV: COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES 044 THAT the performance of the work by the Contractor as outlined in SECTION I of this Contract shall be based on the following responsibilities of the County: 1. The County shall mark or identify in some mutually acceptable fashion any trees, structures, or vegetation within the confines of the property which shall not be unduly disturbed or damaged by the Contractor prior to the initiation of any demolition 'or lot clearance work. 2. The County shall assist the Contractor in the location of property re- ferences points by providing a map, marked as Exhibit B. which shall designate the boundaries of the property within which the Contractor shall perform his demolition and lot clearance work, and if necessary the County shall actually show the Contractor, the location of pro- perty reference points by visiting the property site. 3. The County shall obtain any and all necessary approvals and permissions from property owners for the performance of the demolition and lot clearance work by the Contractor. 4. The County shall arrange for the removal of any and all electrical service drops prior to the demolition work. 5. The County shall make available to the Contractor any other information • or records in their possession which would assist the Contractor in the performance'of his work under this agreement. 6. The County shall provide all necessary information to the Contractor re- garding its requirements or any changes as expeditiously as necessary for the orderly progress of the work. SECTION V: CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITIES THAT the performance of the work by the Contractor as outlined in SECTION I of this Contract shall be based on the following responsibilities of the Contractor: 1. If, through acts or neglect on the part of the Contractor, any other Contractor- or any subcontractor shall suffer loss or damage on the work, the Contractor shall settle with such other Contractor or subcontractor by agreement or arbitration, if such other Contractor or sub-contractor shall assert any claim against the County on account of any damage alleged to have been so sustained, the County will notify this Contractor, who shall defend at his own expense any suit based upon such claim, and, if any judgment or claims against the County shall be allowed, the Contractor shall pay or satisfy such judgments or claim and pay all costs and expenses in connection therewith. -5- 04r 2. The Contractor shall not execute an agreement with any subcontractor or permit any subcontractor to perform any work included in this agreement or assign any interest in same, without the prior written approval from the County. 3. Except as otherwise specifically stated in this Agreement, the Contractor shall provide and pay for all materials, labor, tools, equipment, water, light, heat, power, transportation,.superintendence, temporary construc- ~ tion of every nature, charges, levies, fee or other expenses, and all other services and facilities of every nature whatsoever necessary for the performance of this Agreement and to perform all work specified in this agreement complete in every respect within the specified time. 4. The Contractor shall be responsible for all damages to person or property that occur-as a result of his fault or negligence in connection with the prosecution of the work and. shall be responsible for the proper care and protection of all materials delivered and work performed until completion and final acceptance, whether or not the same has been covered in whole or in part by payments made by the County. 5a. The Contractor shall exercise proper precautions at all times for the protection of persons and property and shall be responsible for all damages to persons or property, either on or off the site, which occur as a result of his prosecution of the work. The safety provisions of applicable laws and building and construction codes shall be observed and the Contractor shall take or cause to be taken such additional safety and health measures as the County may determine to be reasonably necessary. Machinery, equipment and all hazards shall be guarded in accordance with the safety provisions of the "Manual of Accident Prevention in Construction" published by the Associated General Contractors of America, Inc. , to the extent that such provisions are not in conflict with applicable laws. • 5b. The Contractor shall indemnify and save harmless the County and its Communi- ty Development Program for damages resulting from property damage, personal injury and/or death suffered or alleged to have- been suffered by a person as a result of any work conducted under -this Agreement. 6. Although the County shall locate, identify and mark all trees and scrubs to be protected during the performance of this agreement and assist the Contractor as much as possible in this effort the final responsibility shall rest with the Contractor. Should any such trees and scrubs be un- necessarily damaged through proven and observable negligence on the part of the Contractor the cost of comparable plant material shall be determined -6- 04E by the County Horticulturist and either paid for directly by the Contractor or an equal amount withheld from the contract sum in SECTION III. 7. The proper and lawful dumping and/or disposal of all materials re- moved from the property by the Contractor as a result of his services as outlined in SECTION I shall be his complete and absolute re- sponsibility. Disposal of all such materials shall be in full accordance with all appropriate regulations pertaining to such matters. The disposal of such materials in unauthorized locations, particularly within Orange County, is strictly prohibited. 8. The Contractor shall make sure that the removal of any and all electrical service drops prior to the demolition work have been done. SECTION VI: ACCEPTANCE AND FINAL PAYMENT THAT upon receipt of notice that the work is ready for final inspection and acceptance, the County shall promptly make such inspection, and when the work is found acceptable under the Contract and the Contract fully performed, the authorization of payment to the Contractor shall be made to a sum sufficient to cover the amount of payment in the Contract. Before the Contractor shall be paid in full , however, the Contractor shall submit evidence satisfactory to the County that all payrolls, material bills, and other indebtness connected with the work as relating to this Contract have been paid. SECTION VII: HUD DOCUMENTS THAT the Contractor agrees to comply and conform with all the following HUD documents: 1 . Conflict of Interest Provisions. The Contractor agrees that no member, officer, or employee of the recipient or its agents, no member of the -7- 04 1 . governing body of the locality in which the program is situated, and no other public official of such locality or localities who exercises any functions or responsibilities with respect to the program during his tenure 'or- for one year there- after, shall have any financial interest, are directed or in- direct, in any contract or subcontract, or the proceeds thereof for work to be performed in connection with the program assist- ed. under this agreement. Immediate family members of said members, officers, employees, and officials are similiarly barred from having any financial interest in the program. 2. Nondiscrimination Clause. The Contractor agrees that no person in the United States shall on the ground of race, color, national origin or sex be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any pro- gram or activity funded in whole orin part with funds available under Section 109, Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. 3. Age Discrimination Clause. The Contractor agrees that no qualified person shall on the basis of age be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity which receives or benefits from Federal Financial assistance. -8- } 04e • 4. Handicap Discrimination Clause. The Contractor agrees that no qualified handicapped person shall , on the basis of handicap be excluded from par- ticipation in, be denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity which receives or benefits from Federal Financial assistance. 5. SECTION 3 Clause. The Contractor agrees to comply with the Provision of Training, Employment, and Business Opportunities in the Section 3 Clause as follows: a. The work to be performed under this contract is on a project assisted under a program providing direct Federal Financial assistance from the Department of Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, as amended, 12 U.S.C. 17O1u. Section 3 requires that to the greatest extent feasi- • ble opportunities for training and employment be given lower income residents of the project area and contracts for work in connection with the project be awarded to business concerns which are located in, or owned in substantial part by persons residing in the area of the project. b. The parties to this contract will comply with the -provisions of said Section 3 and the regulations issued pursuant thereto by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development set forth in 24 CFR 135, and all appli- cable rules and orders of the'Department issued thereunder prior to the execution of this contract. The parties to this contract certify and agree that they are under no contractual or other disability which would prevent them from complying with these requirements. c. The Contractor will send to each labor organization or representative.of workers with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, if any, a notice advising the said labor organization or workers representative of his commitments under this Section 3 clause and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous plat: available to employees and applicants for employment and training. -9 04� d. The Contractor will include this Section 3 clause in every subcon- tract for work in connection with the project and will , at the direct- ion of the applicant for or recipient of Federal financial assistance, take appropriate action pursuant to the subcontract upon a finding that the subcontractor is in violation of regulations issued by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 24 CFR Part. 135. The Contractor will not subcontract with any subcontractor where it has notice or knowledge that the latter has been found in violation of regulations under 24 CFR Part 135 and will not let any subcontract unless the subcontractor has first provided it with a preliminary statement of ability to comply with the requirements of these regulations. e..Compliance with the provisions of Section 3, the regulations set forth in 24 CFR Part 135, and all applicable rules and orders of the Departmen issued hereunder prior to the execution of the contract, shall be a condition of the federal financial assistance provided to the project, binding upon the applicant or recipient for such assistance, its successors and assigns. Failure to fulfill these requirements shall' subject the applicant or recipient, its contractors and subcontractors, its successors or assigns to those sanctions specified by the grant or loan agreement of contract through which federal assistance is provided, and to such sanctions as are specified ,by 24 CFR Part 135, . 6. Access to Records and Record Retainage Clause. The Contractor shall be aware that in general , all official project records and documents must be maintained during the operation of this project and for a period of three years following close out in compliance with 15 NCAC 13L Rule .09 Recordkeeping, The North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development, the North Carolina Department of the Treasurer, U.S.. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Comptroller Generi of the United States, or any of their duly authorized representatives, shall have access to any books, documents, papers and records of the Administering Agency which are pertinent to the execution of this . Agreement, for the purpose of making audits, examinations, excerpts and transcriptions in compliance with the above Rule. ■ -10- 05C WITNESS the signatures of the parties on the day and year first above written. ATTEST . . COUNTY OF ORANGE, NORTH CAROLINA • BY: • ATTEST BY: This instrument has been preaudited in the manner .required by the Local Government Budget and Fiscal Control Act. BY: 051 • EXHIBIT A • TO AGREEMENT for DEMOLITION, LOT CLEARING AND HAULING SERVICES between COUNTY OF ORANGE, NORTH CAROLINA and • Exhibit A 052 LOCATION DESCRIPTION . FOR DEMOLITION, LOT CLEARING and HAULING SERVICES ( 1) Dwelling Unit #1 Route 4, Councilville Chapel Hill, N.C. Tax Map 113, Block C Lot 21F Description: Demolish structure. Clear and remove from the property, debris from demolition, trash and branches on the north and east sides of dwelling. Remove well pump, tank and house. Place a cap on well casing. Place a 18" concrete well covering over--the well. Crush and . fill septic tank. Mow the entire area. Remove two (2) abandoned vehicles from area. (2) Dwelling Unit #2 Route 4, Councilvill_e • Chapel Hill, N.G. Tax Map 113, &lock C Lot 21 Description: Demolish structure. Clear and remove from the property debris from demolition and trash on the south side of dwelling. Crush and fill septic tank. Mow the entire area_ (3) Dwelling Units #3 and #4 Route 4, Councilville Chapel Bill, N.C. Tax Map 113, Block C Lot 21 Description: Demolish structures. Clear and remove from the property debris from demolition and trash on the north. side of dwellings. Remove one (1) abandoned car from area. (4) Dwelling Unit #5 Route 4, Councilville Chapel Hill, N.C. Tax Map 113, Block C Lot 20 Description: Demolish structure. Clear and remove from the property debris from demolition'and trash on entire lot. 'Crush ana fill septic tank. Mow the entire lot. 05 (5) Dwelling Unit #6 and Lot #1 Route 4, Councilville Chapel Hill, N.C. Tax Map 113, Block C Lot I7B Description: Demolish structure. Clear and remove from the property debris from demolition and trash on entire lot including around old log dwelling and well house. (6) Lot #2 Route 4, Councilville Chapel Hill, N.C. Tax Map 113, Block C Lot 21C Description: Clear and remove old foundation and logs on the lot. (7) Lot #3 Route 4, Councilville Chapel Hill, N.C. Tax Map 113, Block C Lot 17C Description: Clear and remove from property pushed down trees, limbs and debris on southeast side of mobile home. (8) Lot #4 Route 4, Councilville Chapel Hill, N.C. Tax Map 113, Block C Lot 28 Description: Clear and remove debris on the east side of dwelling in open field and alongside rock wall and entrance path. (9) Lot #5 Route 4, Councilville Chapel Hill, N.C. Tax Map 113, Block Lot 25B. Description: Clean and remove debris and abandoned vehicles in field on east side of dwelling and alongside entrance path and on north side of dwelling. Relocate vacant trailer to cleared area on east side of dwelling and set-up on blocks. (10) Along side New Road . Route 4, Councilville Chapel Hill, N.C. Description: Clear and remove debris and logs at .least 25' on each side of new roadway in Councilville. -2- 05q (11) Lot #6 Route 4, Councilville Chapel Hill, N.C. Description: Mow, clear and remove weeds and noxious growth except for those trees marked by County for.savings.. Remove logs. -3- - 051: EXHIBIT B TO AGREEMENT for DEMOLITION, LOT CLEARING AND HAULING SERVICES between COUNTY OF ORANGE, NORTH CAROLINA - and 3-aql liMiy w N.c. HiG 05t /Oil , • ■ a■ 4 isa 0 L 4 I I k* III�oAa o • a . i- Sp r4 • _ Q ` b 3Q AV i tia_a ii \ 1 cr rl • r COUNCILVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA DEMOf4ITION and LOT CLEARING MAP lillt A Housing to be demolished T = Trailer , ., v. , j—i Lot to be cleared Map No. 1 V 4 Vacant .....01•••••••.....01••••••.....01•••••••0= ORANGE COUNTY 05' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT MEETING DATE JUNE 17, 1986 ACTION AGENDA ITEM Fil SUBJECT: ORANGE GROVE - PRELIMINARY PLAN *********************************************************************** DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING: YES . NO *******************************************************a�**** ** ******** ATTACHMENTS: CONTACT: EDDIE KIRK VICINITY MAP APPLICATION APPLICANT'S LETTER PRELIMINARY PLAN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN AGENCY COMMENTS 5-13-86 DRAFT PLANNING BOARD MINUTES TELEPHONE NUMBERS: Hillsborough 732-81181 Chapel Hill 967-9251 Durham 688-733t Mebane 227-2031 *********************************************************************** PURPOSE: To further consider the Preliminary Plan for Orange Grove Subdivision for approval . This item was tabled on May 20, 1986 to receive further information on revised lot arrangements to address conditions # 1 and 3 (See RECOMMENDATION) . To receive the Planning Board ' s recommendation_ NEED: Robert Moul has requested approval of a subdivision for 35 .35 acres of land located off Orange Grove Road (SR 1006) in Bingham Township . The property in question is known as Lot 21 of Tax Map 5 . It is owned by James Paliourus. The purpose of the request is to permit construction of an eight (8) lot subdivision, which will be an extension of an existing 11 lot subdivision known as Orange Grove Mobile Home Estates. A public road to be constructed to state standards is proposed to serve the subdivision . The existing private road serving Orange Grove Mobile Home Estates is to upgraded to state standards and dedicated public. The applicant proposes to dedicate a 60' right-of-way although only a 50' right-of way dedication is required for a public road . The applicant is aware of the discrepancy. The applicant has revised the preliminary plan to indicate the manner in which the existing lots in Orange Grove Mobile Home Estates are to be combined so that adequate right-of--way for a public road can be provided through this existing subdivision . The applicant owns all of the lots in the existing subdivision except Lots #1 -3 shown on the revised site plan . He is negotiating with the owners of these lots for additional 05 right-of-way in exchange for additional lot area. The -other property owners are supportive of the dedication of additional right-of-way for the establishment of a public road to serve the development. The applicant originally requested approval of twelve lots; however, the Health Department did not approve four of the originally proposed lots for on-site wastewater systems. The applicant combined these lots to provide for a suitable location for an on-site wasterwater system for each lot shown on the revised plan . The property is designated Agricultural-Residential in the Orange County Land Use Plan . That designation permits the development of single-fa;mily residential housiing on minimum lot sizes of 40,000 square feet. IMPACT: -Approval of -the request would allow development of 8 additional lots. A 1981 traffic count - indicated 1000 vehicles per day on Orange Grove Road (SR. 1006) north of Davis Road (SR 1129) . Using 9.51 trips per day per residence, an additional 77 trips per day would be generated on Orange Grove Road . RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Board recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1 . Lots in the Orange Grove Mobile Home Estates subdivision must be combined to meet the minimum lot size requirement of 40,000 sq. ft. outside of the road right-of-way and the subdivision replatted and recorded . (Compliance with this condition requires that the applicant record a combination plat which provides for the right-of-way requirements for a public road prior to final plat approval for the Orange Grove Subdivision. All existing structures in the Orange Grove Mobile Home Estates Subdivision must comply with the setback requirements for the district and be indicated on the combination plat . ) 2. Property lines must follow the sight distance lines at the intersection with SR 1006, as recommended by NCDOT. (Compliance with this condition requires that the combination plat referenced in condition #1 include the sight distance requirements as part of the dedicated right-of-way and not as part of Lots #1 and 16 as shown on the revised preliminary plan . ) 3. Health Department approval of each lot for on- site wastewater systems. (All lots as shown on the revised preliminary plan have received approval of the Orange County Health 0544 ORANGE GROVE PRELIMINARY 3 Department. This condition Is no longer applicable. ) ' 7016 +`*U •3y 33 17.21 AC.CAL. 5 AC.1 I t 1 . f-.--`` 6.73 AC. 8 06C . 1891 ; cif �\ .-�� 14 EA KG ' , ,.--_,..- 1481 1 AC f-, 15 AC.1 f t.5 AC. \\ 4458 -:` 7631 0519 19S a5'5 —; f ��`� pG g ----------- •`\may .------- 1.05�' ��\+\<j i%----. 1 I 6024 a •-57' `\ j ! Fo LGS . `\ AC. / I ! 31 AC. i tepc 02 , 11'. 42 \\ •° / 44 41076 _ i.C, 9C�9 _� �\ , l.OIA 8054 / / I' 20 3 3.28 AC. �� . .o • ' - •:2 �� 1:03 � I f 4 6759 , / 504 AC. aC ��� --+ o / 22A c I_( 7901 . i w - ."'.■._ \\111 3.45 AC./ /� r 97 .I I Zr 23J p 1 1 /;° 1.38AC. , 8730 / �o ,95l7 *fig I I q. x-,7488 ( el PAC.\ a55 i i i AC. LLr AC. •if 86 X21 0. - VIP' - NI _ 22 r ��A, ir Q 17.16 AC. "71 15'3 ii _ 9696 V i i j ° i5A IAC. 3684 i I I. 34 AC / A !93 i — (228 I ' 2.93 AC. 1 ` 8344 `1 ORANGE GROVE APPLICANT: ROBERT MOUL N Zone: A- R LUP Designation : Agricultural - Residential Scale: 1" = hoot 2 ,4 28 AC 6764 - 1 _ �C PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT (INK ONLY) • 11/85 ter!, c' , 061_ L 31—g& :: --) APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL ORANGE COUNTY • (� DATE: _ //zS/G�'‘ SUBDIVISION NAME: C R(IN G- L (, RoV e ,, • LOCATION: 0,10,,.7, .:4 .51cl o S iL'o ,, • ` 11s rA IQ.Y sc"a - iE, 0. ; A . OWNER/DEVELOPER: ,._,--a-v-p-1 e 5 Pc,t e4--YCL., ADDRESS:• P-c', {30x "7) .. TELEPHONE NO.: OH) `PO- -:4)1 41 C•i•t -a I /4 ;i! •/7:..(_, -x-75j' AGENT/CONTACT° Rpb.r - H\Ot L . 'TELEPHONE NO. . 61 n) 34",-Cr/ 1 imr,cr 4 Lcz-.i44 1 ti1Lc.rls•_ 0e..,,t.s-t C v.a .-c'1?....46, 4--)4441‘.... A. SUMMARY INFORMATION: Orange County Tax Map 5. Block Lots] j Township Zoning District(sls TataL Number of Acres: `;, ?, ;- G��_r'2--_.. Phases: �N7 Tote Number of Lots: „ ,�� Average Lot Si za: ���7 �Minimui>m Lot Si xe cc Number/Type of Structures : (existing] iv'�,} �'^ (� (proposed] Ill r'e5;�•1.�,�.- C Lineal Feet in Streets:ets: 14 80 , Acres ih Open Space < 1 rzac. Water Supply: Public(specify) Community __ LIndividual • Wastewater Disposal: Pub lic(epecify3 Community Schoo L District: Inds vi duo l Genera l Land Uses in Area: 19 - �/ , i Fi re Distr'ic"t: � e ) 1-1-e.?"-1.- Critical Areas: stream/dra•inageways food prone areas • -watershed(apecify) historic sites other(expLain] B. ALL plats must be submitted on sheet no smaller than one inch equals . two- hundred feet (111=200 ' ] and no Larger than one inch aqua Ls fifty feet (1 "=50' ] and must contain the following information: 1--- .' subdivision nary but[ding setback Liner _ news of owners) :heck Items - -- ^s`'f nus of surveyor, engineer or - by notation or tppicsl. Las completed) ' •' Lxiatt • land planner v��'`'�•:' existing and Intl.) Preliminar Plan 9 proposed uttt eau- completed) Preliminary frt -` ;{;ti roads (erainage. uti litisai, seats, north error (North et , roads, etc,) top of map) existing, Proposed and date (including revision detail) township, tax map-block-lot :: �, adjoining rights-of-way imeions "k references i:i:i'::i including dimensions and Lam:;�N street names end state road �:'• boundary described with '•'r:`' bearings and distances existin - 4'�':i: g � ••� existing and prop®sad total. acreage of the tract :. _utilities, - 9$:c and acreage of Lots, including nclining #,3'c. � g " type. size*, end excluding area within ' ....... 'f3 hydrants, calves and : . rights-of-way •/ manholes .2...:' contral corner �;:"'•:ti; ->• = existing and sizes and cu imaces proposed Lot Lines with including lma and ranee <v` dimensions --:::.:.:: g g '�'•Y :v Lot numbers -k:::::':: youtypical intersection detaei Ls • phasing fine, y_,:::•. including design and width y,; topography at ten foot (10I Yxr' •v ' intervals V :: of travelway and shoulders :R water bodies, streams, flood- :::::: horizontal alignment and �f• • •• general curve data (public ri; way and floodptaine 1.i '"^ cords) stream buffers and notation permanent features such as :c:_r; indicating restricted _. .-'4:4"1,4 � :: •••; bui ldinge, cemetariee der•lopment potentiaL x:::;: •o-,'S townshi historic landmarks, e p. corporate end extra- adjoining lot ismout territorial planning names of adjoining property • jurisdiction Linea which owners and subdivisions f•V• F. cross the property Location and site of parcels dedicated for public use or reserved � �;.}•3 in common '�'`:•`x Location end site of lots of restricted development notation on plat regarding sore P potential end stormrater management plan indicating provision for control of the first 1/2 inch of runoff from impervious aurferes. • (GRAY AREAS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) . • 062 • C. OTHER SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: 1 . Twenty—six (26) copies of the preliminary plat 2. Two full size copies of an Orange County Tax map . (one copy with tax parcels involved clearly marked) . 3. Where municipal or OWASA sewer is not available, a letter from the Orange County Health Department certifying the proposed wastewater system for each Lot . I, the applicant , hereby certify that the foregoing application is complete and accurate. I understand that a $210.00 fee (subdivisions of 15 Lots or Less) or a $370.00 fee (subdivisions of 16 Lots or more) is due at the time of application . A $5.00 per lot fee is due at the time the final plot is presented for recordation . 4110,ediv- /L .,._ _. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE i NER 'S SIGNATURE 4/1_2J/r/g / . DATE' DATE __-- FEES: Amounts-11)414.7v D at e Paid d 1 331—�� Receipt pt / SGW I.. o6' . ORANGE GROVE STAFF ASSIGNMENT: EDDIE KIRK SKETCH PLAN: Received �1t -11_ -_ Reviewed 10-23-85 PRELIMINARY PLAT: Received 1-11-86 Reviewed 2-5-86 REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT: Received 6-5-86 Reviewed 6.-646 NCDOT: DATE 2- _-86 —_ CERTIFICATION J.M. MiT1s SCHOOL BOARD ORANGE COUNTY DATE 2:1-86 —_ Certification N/A____ UTLITIES (OWASA/Hillsborough/Mebane/Orange Alamance/Durhaim) : DATE HEALTH DEPP-!:TtENT Certi€iication ^pprover' OTHER: Recreation Advisory Council 3-4-86 (Date) Carrboro Fire Department (Date) Chapel Hill (Date) Carrboro _ (Date) Hillsborough (Da_te) Durham (Date) Other (Date) (Date) PLANNING BOARD: Date 5-13-86 Approval ____ Approval with Conditions x__ Denial _ BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS: Date Approval _ _� Approval with Conditions _ _ Denial ___T O6 Post Office Box 1471 124 S. Front Street Wilmington, NC 28401 June 3, 1986 Susan Smith Orange County Planning Department Hillsborough, NC 27278 Dear Ms. Smith: Enclosed, please find eight (8) copies of the revised preliminary plan for Orange Grove. As the plans illustrate, we have combined Orange Grove Mobile Home Estates with this new subdivision inorder to gain more continuity. All of the existing eleven ( 11) recorded lots of Orange Grove Mobile Home Estates have been replatted inorder to abandon the private road and still achieve the 40,000 S.F. minimum lot size. The owner of the subdivision is presently negotiating with three lot owners about the proposed reconfiguration of their lots. In actuality, these conveyed lots will be enlarged inorder to satisfy the individual owners. They are in agreement that the existing private road should become public. Three lots of Orange Grove Mobile Home Estates were deleted inorder to establish the 60 ft. right-of-way and larger lot sizes. The proposed twelve ( 12) lots of "Orange Grove" have also been recombined inorder to reflect the unsuitability for septic systems of Lots #188 # 19, #20, and #22. Basically, #18 and # 19 were recombined with #17; #20 was recombined with #21; and #22 was recombined with #23. All of the lots have been renumbered in clockwise fashion. The two (2) contiguous subdivisions are joined as one, now resulting in sixteen ( 16) total lots. The total acreage is now, 46.92 acres with an average lot size of 2.66 acres. We hope this revised information and preliminary plan is satisfactory to the Planning Department and the Board of County Commissioners. Should you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, Robert L. Moul Land Planner enc. RLM/nm TIMBER & LAND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS. INC. 06 • ORANGE GROVE STORM WATER PLAN OBJECTIVES: The lot layout for "Orange Grove" was done in such a way to maximize the following storm water objectives: ( 1) To establish large enough lots (avg. 2.78 ac.) in order to enhance natural assimilative capacities of the relatively slow soil percolation rates of 2"-6" per hour; (2) To situate lots such that excess rainfall will drain, through sheet flow, into catchment areas called grassed swales, that can absorb and retain the first 4 inch of rainfall during any given storm frequency event; (3) To allow for maximum use of both natural (oak-hickory-pine) overstory and planted herbaceous ground cover (fescue, rye, etc.). to encourage evapotrans- _. piration of the inFiltrated volume of water; (4) To use a combination of easily maintained engineered structures for storm water retention when such devices are rarely needed. Examples include catch basins, rock wiers, rock check dams and diffusers and two simple retention ponds with stand pipes as volume control tools. NATURAL FEATURES: ( 1) Soils - Five soil series exist on the 35.35 acre tract and are illustrated aithe attached table. The permeability of the first eight inches averages 2"-6" per hour for the good silt loam soils which comprises 73% of the tract. The underlying subsoil series peres about .6-1 .0" per hour and can still soak in the first flush of Z" of rainfall with relative efficiency. (2) Geologic Features - The slope of the site does not allow simple one to one calculations since it has a consistent gradient of 4-57 slope from North to South. Some rock outcroppings in the Tatum and Herndon soil groups compound the calculations. In some cases, rock fissures can help infiltrate surface runoff into underlying subsoils. End of the line retention ponds should not be located near these rock outcroppings in order to avoid potential contami- nation of ground water due to heavy head pressures. (3) Vegetation -- The relatively mature (45-60 years) timber with thick layers of leaf litter and Al layer humus also affords fast absorption of the first 4". The large lots allow for future residential use which will have accumulative impervious surfaces (IS) well below the allotted 12% zoning restrictions. ASSUMPTIONS FOR TYPICAL BUILDING: Average house footprint (40' X 45') 1800 S.F. Average 2 car garage footprint (24' X 32') 768 S.F. Average driveway dimension ( 100' X' 20') 2000 S.F. Sidewalk area/lot (50' X 4') 200 S.F. Patios ( 16' X 20') 320 S.F. IMPERVIOUS SURFACES/LOT 5088 S.F. Orange Grove Storm Water Plan Page 2 06C I.S. total for 12 lots 61,056 S.F. I.S. total for road 26,640 S.F. I.S. TOTAL FOR SUBDIVISION 87,696 S.F. Total Impervious Surfaces allowed at 12% = 184,782 S.F. *The total build-out will only result in use of 47Z of allotted impervious surface coverage. RUNOFF VOLUME ESTIMATES: The first JO of rainfall will generate a volume of 3683 cu. ft. of storm water from the total impervious surfaces. (Total I.S. X .042') (A) Road ditch/swale effective retention within R/Ws;2 (6') effective width of 13' design width X I" depth control height with gradient = 17,760 S.F. X .084° = 1492 cu. ft. (B) ..Two grassed swales as easements along lots 19 and 22;(2) 12' X (420' t 570'); 5.5' effective width X 990' length = 5445; 5445 x .5" depth (.042) = 229 cu. ft. (C) Two 50' X 12° x 6 ' retention ponds; 3600 cu. ft. X 2 = 7200. cu. ft. CONCLUSIONS: - Total constructed infiltration = 1721 cu. ft. rainfall; -- Total constructed retention = 7200 cu. ft. rainfall; - 46% of " rainfall will percolate naturally into soil along man-made devices; - 195% of the and almost a full .1" of rainfall could be retained in the swale/ pond system. The extra freeboard is needed due to often neglected yearly maintenance./ cleanout schedules. Soils Classification* 'ORANGE GROVE�� Soil Bedrock Seasonal Rating Rating for Septic Flood Series & TRACT Slope Permeabilty Depth Depth to for Dwellings Tank Hazards Texture first 8 inches H2O Table Topsoil Suit- ability (�fo} (Acres) (°Jo} (inches/hr.) (ft) (ft) Enon Loam 5 1 .93 2-6 .6-2.0 +5.0 +2.0 Poor Severe Severe (EnB) (thin) (shrink- (Peres- None swell) slow) Georgeville 20 Poor Silt Loam 7.3 3 6-i 0 2.0-6.0 +5-0 +6.0 (thin) Moderate Moderate None (GeC ) Herndon Silt 52 18.41 2-6 2.0-6.0 +5.0 +6.0 'Fair Slight Moderate None Loam (HrB) Herndon Silt 1 •25 6-10 2.0-6.0 +5.0 . +6.0 Fair Moderate Moderate None Loam (HrC) Tatum Silt 22 7 ,63 8-15 2.0-4.0 3.5-5 4.0-6 .0 Poor Moderate Severe None Loam (TaD) clayey) (depth to rock) Traot Totals 100 35.35 Soil Conservation Service O� OU - Soils Map SOILS LEGEND f j EnB -- Enon GeC - Georgeville 1 HrB - Herndon HrC —Herndon (Slope) i TaD - Tatum i i j j . 11 1 j C .\ -- TaD� HrB GeC I i Ta D IH rB TaD I i 6 HrC Aii11111111166, • Scale: 1"=313 Feet TIMBER & LAND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS, INC. L r �.� .5 ON got lop I Wick'- � ra ,; h t c� —r 3 4,Ozjk q i�Lk�F.11� Ue �` /a o,, ujq - � iA T �11 oac.f of - -+.. �'�i;�T �v �r �e1 {�f95� / !� Fci{ - r ° y RoR D s FUTON (F-A A P F)T E'D C, tj L F-) a z n N.Cw m z NEW -^1 ZTDta i �pv- d �E.. N q�f �' -' aZ,rj'� � ' � �ea.4t d � j Nom..► rjwi{ad�e�;Srny► `��Q, �t►.rr.�� Pave Jos .5 ' _� ��� l ✓ F''r , C1 t �5 5 .Sw., �C .r, „j:� ���_�r c.��r�. 3 .f..'�. �l c �'t� . J �'C Z a sca�t 5 ECT T-o N ,}� �Or'�20ti]�Gl = 3a CD M F•r. R � E[jA'lr'c?l b(e i rl i i 21G W la 1 i Vy 'fZ,Or O b l r•OOGdI[ �IDW ti� 9P0.S$Cd \ej.4?pasaOtib Nr _ . (o'!I PVC �ti p• ;—� �--- :.. ._..,.:�.; L f m -FYF ExCRVOrC-b RETTO pot> (5o x 6 m NoTrS � t► r r j Z -� G R S 5 Q j LO 0 �._ , ?C ` Lk D D `f C3 ��P2,r-2 Yv Do---,e S tic- S>e S RX �eSC�r,,Q � ou SS R e- �iav Wa'wl�r m 3 A1� Ber►hS NO`S 'fib f�Y tec 1N�1� e?f rep,; Aid m 0 /o �C• r �1 t? �� +,..� c!Q h7� k 3 S a 1v olt7 . n oil ci 1 Roc /<, �ri �- ►� � a ' 1,;�� G � , �r W� 'z C �. `ro bR . se w s?`<<ry� n Rot L�:er � r�la>J5 � a K i y r �. Pr dC `F2 ✓ rv.inl2 � kQ t Glow., SIN��e It] (Gl3��i� �'l - a N05. C12 ,r �,✓� 1 j r„Pt.V;D..5 1$rf . ' ~:.' S 88 O T2 9 28* E 1 11 of e A 0495 SA IVA o 545 Ss�•,,,`� r,ti f r f drop laytrT' O� 00 - -� `�`'�- ``�`- �• .:�. '� Cock cook QG t dAw, • zzi- 1&3f. S.f.�'• O O r r t , 5o917.� � { � t rI �,ate,�w iD►� �C�J Oar ber"•Z 57-11 w o Scale: I " ='200. Feet TIMBER & LAND MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS. INC. \'•. 4 • STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Graham, NC 27253-0766 JAMES G.MARTIN GOVERNOR February 6, 1986 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS JAMES E.HARRINGTON SECRETARY Orange County Mr. Marvin Collins I A-7-6C. Orange County Planning Department 106 East Margaret. Lane Hillsborough, NC 27278 Subject: Preliminary Plan for the Orange Grove Subdivision Off- SR. 1006 Dear Mr. Collins: We have reviewed the preliminary plan for the above development and offer the following comments: 1. Base and paving should be eight (S) inches compacted ABC stone and one and one-half ( 1%) inches of I-2 surface course. 2. We recommend that the property lines follow the sight distance lines at the intersection with SR 1006. 3. The intersection with SR 1006 should be constructed to figure 4, page 28 of N. C. Department-of Transportation, Division of Highways' subdivision roads standards. I�. If there are any questions, please advise. Yours very truly, J. M. Mills / DISTRICT ENGINEER JIYIM/JBH:j bh cc: Mr. Robert L. Moul • An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer is f3 IA N c Grange (IInuntu Mt creation nnb Varka ilepartment Att '. 300 West Tryon Street c > HILLSBOROUGH,N.C.27278 '�..ife.Belfllt. MEMORANDUM • TO: Eddie Kirk, Planner • FROM: Mary Anne Black, Director DATE: March 4, 1986 RE: Courtesy Review Comments Please pardon my tardiness in getting these comments back to you regarding Burnside Parke Oak Rise, and Orange Grove Subdivision. BURNSIDE PARK Although I am unsure of the purpose for the subdivision of this tract, I am quite concerned about development of any type along the precious water resource of the Eno River. Please call me immediately to discuss this property. • OAK RISE I am unfamiliar with the creek traversing this property but the 100' buffer denoted seems adequate. The denoted Phase V 15' pedestrian easement is too narrow, however . I recommend a minimum of 30 feet. ORANGE GROVE SUBDIVISION I find nothing noted on the preliminary plan map concerning the clearing and/or planting of trees_ Are you aware of these plans? I recommend minimal clearing of trees. I appreciate the opportunity to offer these staff comments. I will present my recommendations to the Orange County Recreation and Parks Advisory Council on Tuesday, March 4 and will forward to you any changes/ additional comments they may have. MAB/pbl CC: Lorraine Parker, Chair, Recreation & Parks Advisory Council Steven H. Law, Central District Supervisor Brian E. Cox, Southern District Supervisor Hillsborough, 732-9361 • Durham, 688-7333 • Chapel Hill, 968-4501 • Mebane, 227-2032 n..... ,-•...J.. Al n O R A N G E C O U N T Y 074 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date June 17' 1986 Action Agenda SUBJECT: LYNWOOD ACRES iI : DIVISION OF LOT 1 - PRELIMINARY PLANeme DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes No Attachment(s) Information Contact: JANE ATWATER APPLICATION VICINITY MAP PRELIMINARY PLAN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN AGENCY COMMENTS DRAFT 5-19-86 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 • Chapel, Hill - 968-4501 PURPOSE: To consider the Division of Lot 1 in the Lynwood Acres II Subdivision, property of Neil and Lou S. Beard, for approval . To receive the Planning Board 's recommendation. NEED: The property in question is located on Damascus Church Road (SR 1940) in Chapel Hill Township , The property is referenced as Lot 15 of Tax Map 118. It is bordered by residential development. The tract is designated as Rural Buffer and University Lake Water Supply Watershed on the Land Use Plan. There are two (2) lots proposed; the sizes are 6 .32 acres and 2.09 acres, outside of the right-of-way. The property is zoned Rural Residential and subject to the overlay zoning district Water Quality Critical Area (WQCA) . Proposed access is provided to the site via an Orange County Class "C" private road named Mr. Neil Road . Fire protection for the property is provided by the Damascus Fire District. Law enforcement is provided by the Orange County Sheriff 's Department. It will be patrolled on a 24 hour basis. IMPACT: Development of this subdivision would have minimal impact on the area. The projected traffic generation for this subdivision is approximately 19 .02 trips per day. According to the Department of Transportation, the 1985 (most current) _-... 07" trafficount for SR 1940 as determined from the south side of SR 1942 is 800 average daily trips. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Board recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan contingent upon the following condition: - provide a vicinity map on the Final Plat • 0 \\\c. i 6.42 AC. I \\ 4136 • _i \ y 1221 38.24 AC- 4 , � / I. 0"7 F4 4 4 ,. ,'` ' 7.5Q AC- s7 e \\ ' 4 \/ r i 6-17 9 AC. , i k414111it, ,, .., .9706 / \\ 'pr , 5 /153 , f� 4 ' e / 1 3.9$AC. _ I3$5 . k •• 4 AC. 2 5 60 ` ROq p 17 . - 1 2AC 7340 13.55 AG PP .• ~•�=_ 14: 2AC 0 1210 6118 19 __ _�0 z/ 2.04 •— ' 5.19 AC. AC. 4 AC zo Q1093 19th 15A •'•� �. •4 AC. .7772 ��`_� ISM 4649 41 51 AC. 5 57 AC. �,� 9835 ,9 - �r� 5 AC. 4 01 AC. 7770 \` Q - �:. \k■ �) 4. 8J 73x AC.9178 \ D9292 :4 AC. �'s' r;t `�. . -mac. ,8 II •• 6134 ��g 42 19A yy ,� I �`- 9823 28.23 AC. j \ MASEE P120-581 1 1 ATC-A5L2I'lOF Lvov) 0 " —pc ppucAkir : N!r ACID LotI BEARD i / \\ \\ ZONING: R-1 INCA-2uRAL p-.6ICFNnN../wAr�Z QuAUT`J ER.p7CAL AREA 90 i 7�DAl: RtinA✓suFa eR/aN,vE�I$1 £4I WA7e25I �I 8102 \ 2r' 1 /Lap p�5trr WA71�R �' 27.01 AC. c- rA / .. J1r e _ kill 1 I2.:, qtr '6733_-� e(, i/. / ` SEE 1 1 I (WOEFt—POND). �! ti� I \, •_ / I VALE:III 400'-D" j r/7 _,% L PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT (!P1K ONLY) _ - • 11/85 07 APPLICATION POR SUBOIVTSIOR_ APPROVAL A • DATE: 128 1 SLo • SUSDIVISI ON NAME: , 1.."1 ■1,■satin , Ac Q.FS . LGCATI DN: tic -rq c F sIpli bo a r3 1 940 OWN ER/QEVELDPERr NErL (&EIRD E Llal.E. SinlOPQ.L LOS • ADDRESS: 'Pi-, i.a . 43ox 13c, TELEPHONE ND.:(=11cf) 41.3.13,145 ' • Cho.pet. 14t11 i NC a"TS1dt ; • AGENT/CONTACT, _ TELEPHONE NO . : ___- A: `SUMMARY INFORMATION: Orange County Tax Nap 113. • attack Lot(al 15 Township CuAPEL HILL. Zoning Di strict(sl : R- 1r . TataL Number of Acres: 9 cicrzs Phases: I PhasQ Total Number of Lots: .r„... Aye Lot Size: 7CeramMinimum, Lot Size 2 rc.s Number/Type of Structures.: (existing] _ ---- (proposed) I per Int. Lineal Feet in Streets: _ Soo P. , Acres in Open Space �-- Water Supply: _Pub Lic(specify] — Community t." Indivi due t Wastewater Disposal:, Public(opeci fy) — Community /,,,Individual. Schco L District: 04-APE)_ Hip.` Fire District: bA rrLASCI_S Genera L Land Uses in Area: AG[ZIc�Liii_eA 1_/MESA Dc 1TIA1_ Critical Areas: V street:/dreinageways f Load prone areas V we-tershed(specifyluiVt1.L.4ILE histc•ric sites other(explain] . S. AL l p Lets musty be submitted on sheet no sma Liar than one inch equals two— hundred feet (1 "=2Dtl' ] and. no Larger than one inch aqua Ls fifty feat (1 "=50' ) and must contain the fo l Lowing' information : • - subdivision name ✓P- building setback Lines . . :..' name of aunsr(ai ;``• by nntstien or typical tot heck 1 tams `.. ne■e of surveyor, engineer or ✓ kc� layout O(11 �BtBt� t/ h • land planner W unloving and proposed eons-- 13 ) (title] Preliminary Plan ' manta (drainage, utilltise, ',' noels, north arrow (North at y.. rands, etc.) ✓ >. to of sap) ✓ existing, proposed and . ty : data (including revision dates) 1 adjoining righta—of—way township, tax asp—block—Lot } including dimensions and ✓ rifsre ey described with 'tryst nweee and assts road_ numbers ✓ baeriogs and distances P existing and proposed total 'orange of the trace utilities, including �• ° and acreage of Lots, including � : type• si;es, and excluding area within hydrants, vulrer and rightsfwey `0 manholes eentroL earner ✓ ;;; , existing and proposed culvert J .. 'reposed Lot Linos with including sizes and grads■ 3.7 dleensione typical 'treat cross—sections Lot numbers w phasing Lines :mg and intsreae:ion dittolls JC! topography at tan foot (1G1 : including assign and width Etintarvsll — of zrntalrev ign stouldand . -` water bodies, streams, flood— ', horizontal alignment and way and ftoodplaine :•:.::: general strum data (public : }, roads) s>; buffers end notation ✓ indicating restricted building features such ee buildings,, eaeetariee, vl ?�•, development potential > ;j�1�•.:vvL Y historic lsndsarka, ,,.,v township, corporate and extra— ✓ ' adjoining lot - layout tarriterlel planning asses o Y:. urisdietion lines which noses of adjoining property �`� ; owners end suodivisione v.r le cross the property Wootton and size of parcels dedicated for public use or reserved in common i _ Location and size of lots of restrictad development potential and notation on plat regarding same ;, starsnuter management plan indicating provision for control of the first 1/2 inch of runoff free impervious surfaces _'MST OE- iI ormj) - . --- ... ._.._ ...1.. .. . ...... _ -. ..,�� ..... ..� • 07 OTHER SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: . 1 . Twenty-six C25) copies of- the pre Liminary plat 2. Two ?VA size sepias of. an Grange 'county Tax nap [one copy with tax parcels involved cLearly marked) . 3. Where municipal or OMASA sewer is not avai Lab Le, a Latter from the Orange County HeaLth Department certifying the proposed wastewater system for each Lot. , the appLicant, hereby certify that the foregoing application is compLete and cattrete. I understand that a $210.00 fee (subdivisions of 15 Lots or Less). r a $370.00 fee. Eaubdivisiane of 15. Lots or more) is due at the .time: of pp Li cati an . A $5.00 per Lot fee i s due at the time the fi na L p Lat is resented for recordation . LL r?nJR 0% PPLICANT 'S SIGNATURE OWNER 'S, SIGNATURE 3127 \ 8 ATE DATE k fl'4O FEES: Amount ° Date Paid 3- 21-1340 Receipt 1114�r • LYNWOOD ACRES I I - -DIVISION OF LOT 1 • 11/85 ORANGE COUNTY CERTIFICATION AND APPROVALS - PRELIMINARY Pi_AT. STAFF ASSIGNMENT : JANE ATWATE? SKETCH PLAN: Received _ 3-6-36 Reviewed 3-12-36 PRELIMINARY PLAT: Received _ 3-27-86 Reviewed 4-41-R6 REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT: Received Reviewed NCDOT : DATE 5-2-86 CERTIFICATION SCHOOL BOARD (Orange/Chapel Hi ll-Carrboro ) : DATE1 -22-96 Certification UTLITIES [OASA/Hi l lsborough/Mebane/Orange Alamence/Durham] : DATE Certification OTHER : Recreation Advisory Council k-25-!?6 (Date) Carrboro Fire Department (Dale) Chapel Hi l l .�w —(Date) Carrboro � [Date] Hi llsborough rV� (Date) Durham (Date) Other Sed. and Erosion Control (Date) HEALTH DEPARTMENT -?' $6____ [Date) PLANNING BOARD : Date _„ 1236 Approval Approval with Conditions Y Denial BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS : Date _ Approval __ . Approval with Conditions Denial 08C HISTORY OF LYNWOOD ACRES SUBDIVISION Balarguga Aa/i v i t y Dale 21 Auavaal L21z_lAaitA/ Lynwood Final 8-16-82 4 (36. 74) Acres All lots had direct frontage on Damascus Church Rd. Lynwood Final 11-21-83 3 (13 .0) Acres II All lots had .direct frontage on Damascus Church Rd. . , _......„.....trris f. :V __....-•-"" 4 % ' 326 i 7----'..\ 1 141 144 \.3 Aorr sa OMITTED 4 146 1 1" i5C 1 " • \ ;1 18381 123a . . •4,c) 5.13 AC. sEs MAP118C t RETLYN ACRES---1-61 - 2 ----.. ....-- .....„-• --, ---- ...--- -... ---- ---- _----- ,:••■cp i-i-z-c----7 . . 'd■S‘ .4.4.4. .., 523/, .c. " 15D ' ' ' —/ ' 2397 . . . 14).e„,.. --■-.... ..„ ' _f 51-I / ) EE MA? 1180 .. ' ' 2 AC. ' 1 1 - 41% // 5.0a AC.,/ N ESTATE , / •15E \ Fi'' . _ PH 1 a pi.42, --6% --- --:s----" 1 0/s„... _..... 1 0 5 I I\ 6 ,,„5,./ci. c.1671 \ I ! C 0 S 040i if; 15G 41441A° w°5141°TAAer ® - 6.42 AC- /# FL/ IA 1 4136 ' 221 . 3 8.2 4 AC• ill 1 *..... ... 1 7.50 AC. ...H: li . LYNNW000 ACRES// .-.„ ONWOOD A I I.... DevE.,.. An • 15 , 1 t --_--\ .7 APPROVED 8-&- z.ii.0 Ar. • : •-...,-- /,,,, 3- ',144i11- 9 4C ,' , . 5N) (7;`, ,N, 2 '- _.../1:' '.---\ (.17‘,..._.) ,,_P 4., / .3-41 ,...___ / 7340 \\ 13.51)AC. 1210 6 i 19 \---„, , CO AG. ."---,, '... ).--.---,, Ne -•,,, • \--...... .--....,\ ,...-- N- \ AC. / 5 57 AC C. \'\ 5 AC' -C --------_______ \\ --______ \. \ \ . ,... ---4 ' X t. ■ .-.... 14A \\" 4326• `� bi 14H \ - AQTC 15; QMITTED �; 838I 1232 \Y r 15C 5.13 AC. X2.28 SEE MAP II8C r .o• a�'^C14,. AC, 15O 1 AC. 06 `� �yY ( RETLYN ACRES,W 2 / SEC I1 \ af .........\ • /............; .....„.....- , N.CE• , 2 4,-. , . \ . _1s� e r I N 523:" z 3�- % /,Q�. 3 5H 4 MAP ;18D 'Q�` ',2 AC. / Y Pali a � J9 ,`41i3o? 5.02 AC ESTATE `E C)' \- PHI a PH2) . —, � r - - 5° " 'N ©/ . I `ST ?71 ` 15F 1% 9c s S °401 ' AAE•1DOi/WOODS I g J 15 G DC PEIL 6.42 AC- / OF A 26.97 AM Mer FU I'( 4136 - . •.•" 1.71 . 38.24 AC. ilv -� s. X14 1 IF4----\---- k ' }4 4 7.50 AC- I ` LYNNWOOD,CREST LJwooD ACREs , 1 ,5 a7~3s \ . R,EpVIS1oN- OF A 13.0 AWL *4a'\t/4:: lPP12DVED 11-2h83 Ai ''''' 94C /,:fi 3 \ f // x \ \- `� 1 (1-7N,1(1-7N,1 32.5 34C - \\.,12-55 AC. 24c. 0 12 0 / 6118 -- � - - 0 \\ '�,� 5-19 AC. �/ / \\ ` ~�~ ��� 4 �' `-�-� •_':7:\ \ /" \�/ . C. 5 57 ,AC. ass \. C\I \ ---., N., 83 , 3 ,�C. ti �. 91'0 08t! STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 LYNNWOOD ACRES II ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA APRIL, 1986 PROJECT NO. 28602 PREPARED FOR: LOU SIMOPOULOS NEIL BEARD ROUTE 12, BOX 136 CHAPEL HILL, NORTH CAROLINA 27514 PREPARED BY: PHILIP POST AND ASSOCIATES, INC, ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS CHAPEL HILL, NORTH CAROLINA PHILIP POST & ASSOCIATES, INC. JOB La r / , `Yni.vruovn /4G26s 2r Engineers/Planners/surveyors SHEET NO. � OF 100 Eastowne Drive Suite 208 CHAPEL HILL NORTH CAROLINA 27514 CALCULATED.BY '' DATE 4 -2-®G (919) 929-1173 493-2600 CHECKED BY DAT_ P2&r aw+...► y — 5TV Ma.JP meow P 6-r> n� /'►�►A6Er 41 pr a AA: P��T D6errnc4 I' £tan.i!�!....... I".447:s TC 4.4... -..._f°Z_ 5't16R" g/0..V aF . 'm_.......,..,._.....CIO�.., .. : - .. _.—..�._. . ..... .. _C � ; rv2/sr6� �2prap 2 NBrG aka 6^!_ ...._......_ a�J �Hi HR-XiavA* Praous Qn� .... etc.;µ _fir'". wrc�. ��' _ __..'6 5/7' !. = Awn S,L Y4 L 'SF — —•�..c............._.._.- _." E E"iJC�5T1}•►¢...........__��_.... ©_...._ f : 5r7fhd. Fi4ld/1 �n10 Or� i:rs i0 . PRAt ?f�oPbA eo ;. Per✓A�f'v< w.._R� ......- ' ._sa,,o .......:...1 M'k $ / ,4 n-Ie N0ai-nf .. ... _ ........ ................. :: - — ..._.....� _ ....;....... _:. .. 1 f�7 �EO..........:..�S� LW�lleiL.. .. '1fFNAG[�e�.1it....... ....SSrr.......... ._L...,..Ca+Srxr ..._.. 4 °Sri !._;- .._iPersQ-7o-n1....__009., 4 ___...Ore- Tltr£,....Sdd THF-As.T'......-..Star-..—T ..:.........� X ... ........ !i'PIC. ��v o.A!�............Cv .'.t7, S _-.. .. 5... i5.. .....P�Er. �N. .........5n/Oy 7P; l7f�'F.Z rrJt THE _......_... NPR ......._.................... A'-1( a ,kor r'cr yS 4 P __..._... ............__._.._...O..F._........ B....... ...I�V .0 Ft C�d4A'!'!q�a� G TD�f _. . ..._....... ..... . a o RtiC /00 Woaos, f/ 0,4.1 A2.Cai D.2� O2c 0.2 ,•ie.- . \ .. �,Ce gr 6; /%...r, �iyft-. = x.75 0. D<fsy. Pty, vs sr r•�,- �'V . 6W 4.n ; Ifi 4' i6 - D.9s 0, 053z. C pos-r- / ,.3297 5�/ J. 33 0EA 0 85 PHILIP POST & ASSOCIATES,. INC. Joe I-or I , Lyrrttrwooa ACRES . Engineers/Planners/Surveyors SKEET NO._ Z • OF 100 Eastowne Drive Suite 208 CHAPEL HILL, NORTH CAROLINA 27514 CALCULATED BY ffiga. DATE ¢` -0 (919)929.1173 493-2600 CHECKED BY -• DATE P ' SCALE -idfrfI/✓A+, • srveifrt AtAlvelcst,I IT 4.40.1 • • • F42 • • • 6nlvsc • • • • • • • Z - SrI , . 9:ai arc -- - — r:.._.._..: _4-.._......� _.... 1-0-.X4 c! __................. 042-5).. • b. - _r --. - �P2Si' .D !!foot_.. car...............L0-y f1Ap..._._...... r • .q o. 33 .57 cq.0 r) - 2Z 3a cis c' DES n.,)......:.._5Y5' ._.:..... . • .. ... .. ...:...... ...... :.... ...._ W• • iPo P 'i , rr ___.�_........._...._..__._ ... ............ _. _ •4),a •i 22.3. ... ..... ...._/6=s...r.... ._•.... 5.c�.. ..._.................__... .:.............:.. ...... . ... 2. APPRvr. S )kH4, 2 QJ Rya 5= ( 1 - qo) 710 i~.......3.-7..) • vat_ = S".4 ts)( of /, bZo c_ . .• fP(iz o ' 5 r ._ C . � �.� 3' o F r P Fa,e 1:1&-',-,54...)7 o,a t&,=s,,J • M�l�- = 23.,F x z 08E PHILIP POST & ASSOCIATES, INC. JoB r 1 LYmt/w000 Aims . Engineers/Planners/Surveyors 3 100 Eastowne Drive Suite 208 SHEET NO OF_ ¢ CHAPEL HILL. NORTH CAROLINA 27514 CALCULATED EY felts DATE ¢'Z-86 (919) 9294173 493-2600 CHECKED BY - DATE_ • SCALE 471.4taM1,JA•‘y — 5l M MfFNMF rt*j- 0144A T� Dc P• ; SLOW ;r,.;, , ;a "-- _ .... • . _ ._. - ...... ............ .............---- ............. _..... 4'taut ej Oli G 2 • 77x44± 4 r (.3 3 T r• _..__...._...�....... .._...._._. ea-,c fraud f-R o 5t�6}3iMsi.J ±mod• 6.33 Cis 4! c>rs 571,''rv.., RcP` PIA ......... . d DE?F► 74.1: A2.rsi 27i Onl / _. ...,........._fay _4444 -- 4444 c.o r . 4444 -- - 4444...__------........ 444:4._ .� 444.4 _4444 ... . ................:..... . ........:_---444:4 _ • �:. 44:44.. 4_,444. ...P aN►.14,141... ..:...... 5r -r .. :4444 su M►r►: P+E S 4,4 ... I n1 D'Cr4'►rs S y 5 r +.. _ -4444.. ..... .. 754EPro� ' Dr X Z 3R 4` DErrE,►gal ahSrrl 3- �S�rtccrt<o •o01.E-7 �V........Pe4rr tr......' M/3,c7e _....o..14......_cfs!.. chi r ar�l Pte.) D'Jo;'mo. 1.0 - ...ye. 4444.since-r. b. /5"- RGf 771 P.40e +s Fa j]rr el r_rNF la• SrGc4...........p. ....ate eo At;. ANQ . I T Ge.-2 ‘,.)2 f-,./5. /:+S - 6/i•►aler ,-=5/Grd FO 2 T}FE / J'F.e. r]ed-a co TGET 4r•J0 ?g./ ✓A-eE le.0F•-ta M u L. 146.....—d0 M/[., ht.( 7'0 f'N.*. that'ILO to'ra or" OF G [dp.1 5777.t/C17pi 77i-i5 5y/yr7 f+ i - - --`---- .—------- --- - GLASS 'C' PA ATE RDADy "s ''�'t``°Sr?4F� f Ni"TIGIF WAY \\ ///'►\� ' 1 _ \ LHOUILLR. SHOULDER {!'► J C�:I S �GSJ ITRAVELWAY S D e ya ,r O f V"w"TWf�- Dj R'.}�. �LOWII� � POND _ _ _ ,� E� 1' D�/+I 7WN 6A51A Lwyw. s'COMPACTED s►9 . EuRFAC;. i jp MEADOW w00\�a) •�,�. PUFF IN PONOiuPNiEA \F{Yf4f LYNNW00 ACRES - :;r s, �• i` IA /lot a 6.92 AC�ULIX ti \ _ Sit. .r. 60 AC.{ v01S 8 public � +. 2.09 AC, D.MDf,, �•;o;�'�A. • LYNNWad A sy � � '`-.�;a„�a""'� yA- +„�1 r ✓ FLARE AT INTEASEC ION WITH PUBLIC ROAD r,.,/•d,'+`a�., ,I,• 9JJtrt '6 ly, ryp �•E�i a�i+'1G� I Pr rtw-RO,3 two+ 1%f M � ��•� r •r4s I Q�'�� ��TOr�f"�W �FT,_�SfP Yrr i�l,!'i Z .I •iK( - �MA�C o4i cfs ovfF_09 f1•F]O 15' Rce tim L.E.WILSON Ifaa4 fo•A11a, ► as afloa.ln.ail. s'MNNM OWN IN ro..... •I NOTES 1 N�a�a„ �,N,o �� a 0 TOTAL AREA IN TRACT•ROI AC. I.N ua 0 TOPOGRAPHIC INF ORMATIpN TAN QUAD FRDA . I !a w►r[R SUPPLY-UI OIVIDUA L wElrs Y,i,as„••,�,r, J IF 1!! N 41 SANITARY SEWER 1 INDIVIDUAL {� A SEPTIC SYSTEMS. y� L. Off/ PAELImmARY PLAN - A Division or. ALOIJ6• fgJ,)M1 L AVAp LOT I. LYNNWOOD ACRES u I t N tq, AR q Ca HAPEL HILL TWR ORANGE CQ Si %IMUA IMPERVIOUS SURACE OWNER. NORTH CAROLINA wN.INNiuue/or aaiA a WI*a/Ala la a»At. k a s o• ai PHILIP Ixa 1 1 too AA Nall rIIF/LL HILL.N.C.I11116 a & ASSOCIATES FREEHOL D LAND SURVEYS. INC:o v. - a N�I No.sox ass 04111"o NoA7N"Nouke, arm ,L WGIP]EERS/PLANNEflS/�IIRVFYORS - TAX MAP 118-10 -- 401 PROVIDENCE ROAD a SUITE 200 . O. BOX 2134 CHA'EL HILL, NC 27514 a (919)929-1173 a (919)493-2800 •�,'- � •!3(range cmnttg .ereatiun and finks Ilepartment ±3 .N C 300 West Tryon Street HILLSBOROUGH, N.C. 27278 Life.Beln it. . +rrq�s Mary Anne Black, Director MEMORANDUM TO: Jane Atwater, Planner FROM: Mary Anne Black DATE: April 25, 1986 RE: Courtesy Review DIVISION OF LOT 1 of LYNWOOD ACRES II SUBDIVISION I see no element on the preliminary plan warrenting comment from a recreation and park perspective. MAB/pbl Hillsborough, 732-9361 • Durham, 688-7333 • Chapel Hill, 968-4501 • Mebane, 227-2032 Area Code 919 4-25-&0 - 0 8 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT • HILLSBOROUGH NORTH CAROLINA • 2727$ `. �' At `!AMMI1N APR 25 1986 N. C. DEPT. OF TRAPISPOR{ATiON _ r. ; ����.• DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 7TH DIV. • DISTRICT 1-GRAHAM April 22, 1986 t3a-c. v 9 ) z.. -/e Dwight Kellly, Division Traffic Engineer NC Department of Transportation P.O. Box 9278 Greensboro, NC 27408 Re: Division of Lot 1- of the Lynwood Acres 11 Subdivision Dear Mr. Kelly: Enclosed is the Preliminary Plan of the abovereferenced subdivision for your review.. The property is referenced as Tax Ma 118 Lot 15 in Chapel Hill Township and located.. approximately: 2900"south of Ridgewood Road and .y.y- 2300' north of SR1939 on SR1940. The applicant is proposing two (2) lots to be used for single family units. Please provide your comments by May ,9,, 1986. It will be greatly appreciated. Yours truly Jane L. Atwater Planner JLA/ja Enclosure Drive entrance is adequate. Driveway permit required. ,4.t.i, S 2.96, Joe B.. Haynes Highway Maintenance Engineer ORANGE COUNTY PLANING DEPARTMENT 9 N HILLSBOROUGH NORTH CAROLINA 27278 p•tI e 6717"T MEMORANDUM TO: Jane. Atwater, Planner G FROM: Warren Faircloth, Erosion Control Officer` SUBJECT: Stormwater Management for Lynnwood Acres II DATE: May 8, 1986 This plan proposes to meet the Ordinance requirements by constructing a stormwater detention pond to hold the post-development peak rate of runoff to the predevelopment rate. Implementation of the proposed plan would control the peak rate of runoff to the pre-development rate for a ten-year storm. i question the wisdom of requiring the implementation offt a detention structure in a situation such as this subdivision. The construction of the detention pond and the necessary diversion to direct runoff to the pond creates an additional disturbance of the existing woods and reduction of the natural absorbing and filtering capacity of the property. The lots in this subdivision a very large in comparison to the expected area of impervious surface to be added, and the existing pond, which is part of this property, would will act as a filtering device and a detention device without the necessity of additional distur- bance or construction . It would seem to be to the designers advantage to consider these points and apply the existing conditions to meeting the Ordinance requirements. c: Phil Post & Associates PLUVA1 54-e6 091 DRAFT PB MINUTES 5-19-86 PAGE 5 GENDA ITEM #7c: LYNW00D ACRES II : DIVISION OF LOT 1 - PRELIMINARY Presentation by Smith. The purpose of this agenda item is to consider approval of the Division of Lot 1 in the Lynwood Acres II Subdivision, property of Nell and Lou S. Beard. The property in question is located on Damascus Church Road (SR 1940) In Chapel Hill Township. The property is referenced as Lot 15 of Tax Map 118. It is bordered by residential development. It is bordered by residential development. The tract is designated as Rural Buffer and University Lake Water Supply Watershed on the Land Use Plan . There are two (2) lots proposed; the sizes are 6.32 acres and 2.09 acres, outside of the right-of-way. The property is zoned Rural Residential and subject to the overlay zoning district Water Quality Critical Area (WQCA) . Proposed access is provided to the site via an Orange County Class "C" private road named Mr. Neil Road . Fire protection for the property is provided by the Damascus Fire District. Law enforcement is provided by the Orange County Sheriff 's Department. It will be patrolled on a 24 hour basis . Development of this subdivision would have minimal impact on the area. The projected traffic generation for this subdivision is approximately 19.02 trips per day. According to the Department of Transportation, the 1985 (most current) traffic count for SR 1940 as determined from the south side of SR 1942 is 800 average daily trips . The Planning Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan contingent upon the condition that the applicant provide a vicinity map on the Final Plat . MOTION: Kramer moved to recommend approval with the staff condition . Seconded by Shanklin . Kizer inquired if this subdivision had been submitted previously. Smith noted that it was seen as Lynwood Acres I and referred Board members to the history of Lynwood Acres included in the agenda packet. Jacobs inquired how the S & E Officer 's comments were incorporated. Smith responded that Warren Faircioth, S & E Officer was highlighting some options for the applicant. Smith noted that inspectors throughout the area seem to be having some problems with the a9r DRAFT PB MINUTES 5-19-86 PAGE 6 infiltration standards in practice. She noted this would require close monitoring. VOTE: Unanimous. AGENDA ITEM 17d: TORIAN ESTATES - PRELIMINARY PLAN Presentation by Smith. The purpose of this agenda item is to consider the Preliminary Plan for Torian Estates subdivision for approval . William J . Torian has requested approval of a subdivision for 3.3 acres of land located on Kenton Road (SR 1335) in Hillsborough Township. The property in question is known as lot 22 of Block A of Tax Map 1 . it is owned by William Torian . The purpose of the request is to permit development of a two (2) lot subdivision. Both lots will be served by direct access onto Kenton Road, a state-maintained road. The lots will be served by on-site water and wastewater systems. The property is designated Agricultural Residential and zoned Agricultural Residential (AR) . This district permits the development of single family residential housing on minimum lot sizes of 40,000 square feet. The property is located within the Orange County School District and the Orange Fire District. Approval of the request would allow development of the two lot subdivision with lot sizes of 1 .0 and 2.3 acres . A 1981 traffic count indicated 100 vehicles per day on Kenton Road (SR 1335) . Using 9.51 trips per day per residence, an additional 19.02 trips per day would be generated by the development. The Planning Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan with the following condition: - revise the plan to provide the following: 1 ) indicate adjacent property owners and/or adjoining subdivisions to the east and west of the site 2) re-number the lots as #1 and #2 and delete references to Lots A, B and C 3) indicate total acreage of the property 4) indicate any existing structures on the plan 09 O R A N G E C O U N T Y BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date JUNE 17, 1986 Action ends Item SUBJECT: TORIAN ESTATES - PRELIMINARY PLAN DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes ,,.X_ No Attachment(s) Information Contact: APPLICATION EDDIE KIRK VICINITY MAP SUSAN SMITH PRELIMINARY PLAN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN AGENCY LETTERS DRAFT 5-19-86 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 PURPOSE: To consider the Preliminary Plan for Torian Estates subdivision for approval . To receive the Planning Board 's recommendation. NEED: William J . Torian has requested approval of a subdivision for 3.3 acres of land located on Kenton Road (SR 1335) in Hillsborough Township. The property in question is known as lot 22 of Block A of Tax Map 1 . It is owned by William Torian. The purpose of the request is to permit development of a two (2) lot subdivision. Both lots will be served by direct access onto Kenton Road, a state-maintained road. The lots will be served by individual on-site water and wastewater systems. The property is designated Agricultural Residential and zoned Agricultural -Residential (AR) . This district permits the development of single family residential housing on minimum lot sizes of 40,000 square feet. The property is located within the Orange County School District and the Orange fire district. IMPACT: Approval of the request would allow development of the two lot subdivision with lot sizes of 1 .0 and 2.3 acres . A 1981 traffic count indicated 100 vehicles per day on Kenton Road (SR 1335) . Using 9.51 trips per day per residence, an additional 19.02 trips per day would be generated by the development. 094 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Board recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan with the following condition: - revise the plan to provide the following: 1 ) indicate adjacent property owners and/or adjoining subdivisions to the east and west of the site 2) re-number the lots as 11 and 02 and delete references to Lots A, B and C 3) indicate total acreage of the property 4) indicate any existing structures on the plan 09 -_- - -- -- ---- 1r P: EnSL TYPE vn PRINT ( IN. ONLY) --- - 11/85 PPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL QRANGE COUNTY DATE: SUBDIVISION NAME: TORIAN ESTATES LOCATION: Kenion Road (S.R. 1335) OWNER/DEVELOPER: William J. Torian, Jr. ADDRESS: Rt TELEPHONE NO . : HZllsborougn, N.L. 4/176 AGENT/CONTACT: TELEPHONE NO. : A . SUMMARY INFORMATION Orange County Tax Map 1 Block A Lot[sl 22 Township -llsborb\ugh Zoning Districtlsl : R Total Number of Acres: 3.3 ac ? Phases: Total Number of Lots: • Average Lot Size: 1. 8 0 Minimum Lot Site ILLO SF Number/Type of Structural: [existing) One .(proposed) Lineal Feat in Streets: _ Acres in Open Space Water Supply: Public[specifyl Community Individual Wastewater Disposal: Pub Lies act f ) t can ty Individual School District: Hillsborough Firs District: H311Trough Senersl Land Uses � Area: Housing/ Farming Areas: Nstream/drainageways NLALftood prone areas N/A ,watershed[specifyl N/A historic sites other(explain) B. ALL plats must be submitted on sheet no smaller than one inch equals two— hundred fait (16=200' 1 and no Larger than one inch equals fifty feat. (1 "=50' 1 and gust contain the following information: subdivision nor• x t nose of eenerlal building setback lines ": by *station sr typical heck items � *:rte nrrr of gsfwgrer, engineer er ~,�;•±v�: 1P all let omp l e tad) x "fi : p x layout land fanner Itltlml Prelletnrrr Olen :ice quieting end proposed same reads (drainage. utilities. � sable, north ■era■ (North ■e :.:.:`; reads. eta.1 4 top of sap) X ••" existing, "-'.. drug (including �w+++ 9. praprmed end iR;t_ luding revision dateel' r f::' adjoining rights-ofway . ,... township, tax ■ep-block •'is including ...p.;_ references .:.;v, g dimensions end ±!! y pad with :{:> esrsst parrs and regse card �c `''' btendrr desert numbers z:`-+:s bearings end e1 ,c•::a. .� ;` total streage of the tract !:<• s and proposed and acreage of Late. Including typlltsit, including and excluding area within type, t zsa, < rtgnte—df—eny nedi°lee •rlrae and control earner N/A •mintier ir�i proposed Lot lines with including end proposed OULrsrt s: - dimensions �j�� '`-` 1nOLuding aizse end grease .,3G.r ?' lot hustlers N. typical strait cross—sections 1`2 F and intareascion phasing lunge lntlatllnq design details war:: topography at can foot ligl 4 end sidtb **��L�-� topograih :`.? of trereleep end shoulders +1.L0 ` eater bodies. acreage. flood- � ' horizontal all• m0 ''r: way and floadplslnr loads'/ curve dots Lasalle oads) errs•. turf.,, ono negation Z. garrunent restart/0 such es -- - Indicating riatad development building', crseteriee. potential historic lendeerxa, It.. ;-::f townanip, carporetm and extra- territorial plain/nos ++ nejeining fat layout jurisdiction lines which owner of dsud adjoining property N/A eras• the property osiers and subdivisions Leaetien and size of parcel* dedlcatrd for public use Or rrsrrrrd ;+y;-'- Location eno size of lots of restricted develop.snt potential one notation on stet regarding saes 4—I44 +i... aterreater ■anag■.ant plan Indicating provision for control of the �O first 1/2 Inch of runoff free 1rprryioua surfaces (GRAY AREAS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) 09e C . OTHER SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS : 1 . Twenty—six (2B ) copies of the preliminary plat 2. Two full size copies of an Orange County Tax map (one copy with. tax parcels involved clearly marked) . 3. Where municipal or OMASA sewer is not available, a Letter from the Orange County Health Department certifying the proposed wastewater system for each lot . I , the applicant , hereby certify that the foregoing application is complete and accurate. I -understand that a $210.00 fee (subdivisions of 15 lots or Less) or a •370.00 fee (subdivisions of 16 Lots or more) is due at the time of application . A $5.00 per lot fee is due st the time the final plat is. presented for recordation . Arge:;i1,AMIlr !.4 APPLICA. T 'S. $" NATURE OWNER 'S SIGNAT RE /3 . e 4f0 � OAT DATE FEES: Amoant `I5 Date Paid 1 a-q-s5 Receipt IO i 9 TORIAN ESTATES 11/85 ORANGE COUNTY CERTIFICATION AND APPROVALS -- PRELIMINARY PLAT STAFF ASSIGNMENT: EDDIE KIRK SKETCH PLAN: Received 9-4-85 Reviewed 9-11-85 PRELIMINARY PLAT: Received _ 2-15°86 Reviewed 2-25-86 REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT: Received Reviewed 5-13-86 NCDOT : DATE 3-20-86 CERTIFICATION APPROVED SCHOOL BOARD (Orange/Chapel Hi ll-Carrboro) : DATE 2-24"8tertification NO RESPONSE UTLITIES (OWASA/Hillsborough/Mebane/Orange ALamance/Durham) : DATE 2-27-86 Certification APPTOVru OTHER: Recreation Advisory Council 2-24-86 (Date) Carrboro Fire Department _ (Date) Chapel Hill (Date) Carrboro (Date) Hillsborough (Date) Durham W_ (Date) Other _ (Date) (Date) PLANNING BOARD: Date 5-19-96 Approval Approval with Conditions X Denial BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS: Date Approval Approval with Conditions Denial 09r HISTORY OF WILLIAM TORIAN SUBDIVISION EgLezS 1 &c ima Data_Q. _62pL2yal L1215.._.&QTt . W.Torian Final 3-28-84 2 (4.4) Minor Sub. 09� STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Greensboro , NC 27429-0278 JAMES G.MARTIN March 20, 1986 GOVERNOR DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS JAMES E. HARRINGTON SECRETARY Mr. Eddie Kirk Planner Orange County Planning Department Hillsborough, NC 27278 Dear Mr. Kirk: This is in reference to the Torain Estate located on SR1335, Kenion Rd. Access to this property is acceptable as close as can be determined from plans furnished . Sincere J. Watkins DIVISION ENGINEER JWW/DBK/cb cc : Mr. D. B. Kelly An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 10( DRAFT PB MINUTES 5-19-86 PAGE 6 infiltration standards in practice. She noted this would require close monitoring. VOTE: Unanimous. 16 AGENDA ITEM #7d: TORIAN ESTATES - PRELIMINARY PLAN Presentation by Smith. The purpose of this agenda item is to consider the Preliminary Plan for Torian Estates subdivision for approval . William J . Torian has requested approval of a subdivision for 3.3 acres of land located on Kenton Road (SR 1335) in Hillsborough Township. The property in question is known as lot 22 of Block A of Tax Map 1 . It is owned by William Torian . The purpose of the request is to permit development of a two (2) lot subdivision. Both lots will be served by direct access onto Kenton Road, a state-maintained road. The lots will be served by on--site water and wastewater systems. The property is designated Agricultural Residential and zoned Agricultural Residential (AR) . This district permits the development of single family residential housing on minimum lot sizes of 40,000 square feet. The property is located within the Orange County School District and the Orange Fire District. Approval of the request would allow development of the two lot subdivision with lot sizes of 1 .0 and 2.3 acres. A 1981 traffic count indicated 100 vehicles per day on Kenton Road (SR 1335) . Using 9.51 trips per day per residence, an additional 19.02 trips per day would be generated by the development. The Planning Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan with the following condition: - revise the plan to provide the following: 1 ) indicate adjacent property owners and/or adjoining subdivisions to the east and west of the site 2) re-number the lots as #1 and #2 and delete references to Lots A, B and C 3) indicate total acreage of the property 4) indicate any existing structures on the plan 1 DRAFT PB MINUTES 5-19-86 101 PAGE 7 MOTION: Best moved to recommend approval with staff 's condition. Seconded by Kramer. Shanklin inquired in which township the property was located . Smith responded Hillsborough. Yuhasz inquired if the Board of County Commissioners had adopted a description of the location of the township lines. Smith responded there is no legal description of township lines. VOTE: Unanimous. AGENDA ITEM #7e: MEL-OAK PHASE II - PRELIMINARY PLAN Presentation by Smith. The purpose of this agenda item is to consider approval of the Preliminary Plan for Mel-Oaks Phase II subdivision . Calvin Mellott has requested approval of a subdivision for 10 acres of land located off Jones Ferry Road (SR 1942) on an extension of a previously created road known as Mel Oak Drive in Chapel Hill Township. The property in question Is known as lots 30A and 30C of Tax Map 117 . It is owned by Calvin Mellott. The purpose of the request Is to permit construction of an eight (8) lot subdivision as an extension of the pre-existing subdivision known as Mel r Oaks . Two lots (#5 and 6) established in Mel Oaks Phase 1 are proposed to be revised to accommodate the extension of Mel Oak Drive. Mel Oak Drive is proposed to be extended to serve the new phase and is to be constructed to NCDOT standards and dedicated public. The property is designated Rural Buffer and Protected Water Supply Watershed - University Lake. The property is zoned Residential-1 (R-1 ) and Protected Watershed II (PW II ) . These districts permit the development of single family residential housing on minimum lot sizes of 40,000 square feet. The property is located within the Chapel Hill /Carrboro School District and the Carrboro fire district. Approval of the request would allow development of the eight lot subdivision with lot sizes ranging from 40,023 to 60,227 square feet. A 1985 traffic count indicated 2000 vehicles per day on Jones Ferry Road (SR 1942) . Using 9.51 trips per day per residence, an additional 77 trips per day would be generated by the development. The Planning Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan with the following conditions: 1 ) provide a 300' right turn lane taper on Jones Ferry O R A N G E C O U N T Y BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 1 ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date JUNE ""' t986 Action,Alida Item it J.0 SUBJECT: DATE AND LOVIE PARRISH MINOR SUBDIVISION - PARTIAL WIDTH R/W DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes X No Attachment(s) Information Contact: PARTIAL WIDTH R/W CHECKLIST JANET VAN HANDEL APPLICATION TAX MAP PHOTOS EASEMENT SURVEY USGS TOPOGRAPHICAL MAP AERIAL PHOTO DRAFT 5-19-86 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Chapel Hill - 968-4501 PURPOSE: To consider a request for a partial width right-of-way of 30 feet to serve a two (2) lot minor subdivision on property known as Chapel Hill Township Map 112 Lot 34 (Date & Lovie Parrish property) for approval . To receive the Planning Board 's recommendation. NEED: An existing 30 foot private road from Bethel-Hickory Grove Church Road (SR 1104) serves the Parrish property. The Parrish family owns Lots 6, 34, 6B and 6A on Tax Map 112 (SEE ATTACHMENT) . They are unable to obtain additional easement from either Lot 3 (Elsie Lloyd property) or Lot 33 (Bethel Baptist Church property) and cannot subdivide their land unless a partial width right-of-way is approved. IMPACT: If a partial width right-of-way is approved a minor subdivision of two lots for sale to family members would be possible. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Board recommends approval . 10L4 DATE & LOVIE PARRISH MINOR SUBDIVISION PARRISH ROAD PARTIAL WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY CHECKLIST (Adapted from Orange County Subdivision Regulations Section IV-B-3-c-2) NATURE OF SUBDIVISION: - Topography - flat & gently rolling - Surrounding area - agricultural and church - Present Road - existing Class B road - Future Road Plans - to continue as Class B road - Access by public safety vehicles - topography good, road existing, (see photos) CLASS ROAD: existing Class B road . CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD: Good Class B road which with minor work could be a Class A road (opinion by Keith Rosemond, Sedimentation and Erosion Constrol Inspector , following inspection of existing road) RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH: 30 feet established - Fire District is White Cross Fire District - Road can accomodate largest emergency vehicles and presently almost meets Orange County' s standards for a Class A road CONDITIONS: - Access to the proposed subdivision is across the Elsie Lloyd and the Bethel Baptist Church proper- ties . Both owners have been approached several times by the Parrish family and they will not grant additional easement to the family. In the future, the Parrish family would be willing to purchase the Lloyd tract and establish the 50 foot right-of-way. - The road has been used by the community for thirty (30) years . . --:i MINOR SUBDIVISION APPLICATION • o Property Owner(s) i2_ w rAddress 1,24. 2 3/ C.-/�y Phone ( ) Developer/Contact Name )yj s,A .i—,. • 03 -:n Ad . Address Phone ( ) • Location rn of Property- C/7r . /fit- . . d . township map block lot Zoning R- j/iO - Fire District . L. .c.,6 Watershed v . I-- .. Impervious Surface `off- 917 Joint Planning: C.H. Carrboro Carrb1-•"--- - School District • State Road Number I/"© I Name_ /h�G.c, ..s ype �Q Private Road Class 4 Name 670_,4,4_2 ., Do you plan to build the road before final approval? �• C.a or secure construction with a security document? c�7 Utilities: Public Sewer Community System Septic Tank Public Water Community Water Well ~ If on a septic system, the Health Department must examine all existing and potential building sites on lots shown on the plat. . Total Lot Area o A C Number of Lots °2 Lot Number: Size of Lots: Structures (proposed or existing) : I (we) hereby certify that I (we) have read the above information and that the information - I (we) have supplied is accurate to the best of my (our) knowledge. I (we) understand my (Our) application is not complete and cannot be approved unless all required information and material has been provided. 171- `,�'/ - 927L;A., (" a."7,41..;iv Date. Signature Date Signature Filing Fee T of Lots Fee Private Road Fee Other Fee Total Fees Date Paid ------- . . . • . --.=,:------7----3,,:). PH Z 1 0 e • ,,, al -- oi rx*86 1 • ... . , , 7.84 AC.• ','I`::, •aso9 \ . z.... /7 / ; q- O. - MIMINT .. 2,F.74 AC. so° EASIftifier sira 5 5-c-------\- — --- 4),/ '6. p 26/9 „.....— \ ,2 co•ts• -,----- _782 • 7-clq • " 6A 111111111111111111111 , EXEMPT \\:, 2.53*Ar,i...- ....... zoo . 129.92 200" .7472/41/7...s.; 1 sr \\ Ae / 4rd . 4155 • CHURCH li*, - . 54 , e, .w • B , p42/128 GOO- 7738 / . AC/A .. • 1 -- . ...-- ..--------- ..-- •- • --------. 04A. \ ---- c... 111116 : _... . 4ip . ..... \ 0* , all '..7r- 68 AC- L • ,,..0. ' : , • %Ay ..,, ..., 112 \ -.1 6740 . L . \ So, , , \ i I 40 gbatifilli I :- • • • 7504 , , . • '\ Petoporry •--. 1 DATE I* Loits te PA ma ism Fe/ 7871 rt.1 , .`";1 , ( ) / Ca P talP2r / 68.96 AC. ct • 1 / / .4 -./_ ..., I,r ■ . . • i. -_-,.....____ • • . ...... ..._____ .. -. • ...___ ..,_.._.. ... ._ _ . . , . ' . . _ • . • . • • • - . . ' . • _...1 0(..,._,....._ . . -----P I-4 OTO S 0 F • - . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . • • - . • 1 14.RRIS N -R o A b ( Exis-ru.,6., - .. - - . . . . • . . .. • • • . •..... - _-. 1 . . .... • • rt • • • . • _. . . ---""lif,.. -1-:.-•4,... .-.. '. . - ..--. , • ... . ...:_,••.4_ • , • - - . . . . . -V., 1"-g-f.- . . _ I -..- • ....i-.„ ,,_ _.... . . _ . .s. . . ' •,. • . , _ . • -- v -___ • , - : - , . • . . . a-2 _ ..• • .- •• • •. . • . ..• , . _,... 1 :. . • -- • • •, • ... . ••- - -•--. . ,• •,. .. . . . .-. . • . - , — . . . . . . .. . . - . .. - • • • _•-._• •, - • . . . .... . • . . . .-.._ •...•• .... .. .. . . _ -• .•. • - _ • .,.... .. . .. • .- . . .• :_ • .. • • • . . . . , •;:,.•• ._. . --.-1-xfo----_---'•- . .., • . . • . -.,„;2•-,,,,-3:_,-.-,=_T›.;-.1---. • • •,:_-:_,• •-:!;7- , • - . . ..... -,,,--• . _ —" -- •„ . • . _ .. . .,:.-...-._• . . ... ,-:.:_,....---- __ .-.-.-- 4' ;:,_ - -,,d.-..,.-•••,• 2.:2...;,=.:5.:_- . . ....___ _. ,.. -,::,--•• •• •- -.-:..,-- •• -:"17.-F=':: • -'e.-:r.7....-:1- --.;..-:-.,;-•..7,- . .. .,-•-.2--;4'.- -•.•,•±,-•-•-•--A- ' '1,•.#:-._,,',.,••=elt--.V.-..-••••:-._•,,,-,.,-..•••---' _-r,......-•.,,,,. •-.--,•-•.....-.74 -1,- . ,'-:::•'-‘,- ...•-..•-•.,‘.,_:.• NN•••••:X.;:.--,'- .1,- ••7%,, -::1•••:•:;:-:',..1•7,!---::-.:- • - •,,,;.-,..-1-.... •t--77:- •••-•-'...-4:4:-..,=.4,-•:.' • .-.-...-•:-...5,!... ..,-.......• ..-- .7,35.47-4. --.7_- • - - • '-- --:.•L'- r.:_,_•- 4----..•.-_-_. .....".--••• __.„.,---70,•-•-•,,.-44-„:-:-.- .. .--. •-1--.2„ ,..-ftr. ...-T.,7,-=_L ---i.-,' •.-?..-.7.N. .. '...7,:u',-,--,:.-.■■•=g..-%T.iii.--'1'..- --....:,'-.-- . . .,-,:c.1..41.1*F".;''.1'2- ..-Q." .....::,,a. 4..;'..„.......i:c'L".Z.::31.& . MX-747.... . !.'•,'-'7••'...W.T.6=.. I'N.:,]:;•T -::?.4',,-,.--'-',,"....t..titi...,r..t.F..i-1'7.;ii.*L--47-4';'.! '. ..-;'•- =•S.:-. .:,..7f,r. .., :.....7•7-: '''"kt_.........).".--',----..---::0-.,..,--"`-.---.-21,-:,. .-".,.. . -....eA.c.,'• ':.':-......N,,i,••-47::Crii:;-_1.--_''. ..71.-a,_..-'"_--!--. ,In...":4`ztt!.. • .':••••• . -2.1,--,,,, j"...t-,,. -••"..- ''•4.-1■•(. ...:.,r;,,'),-;.-.--1:4,•.'5.-2-.`-=-•-.,;-:-...•=7-: • 7 . . . .l . . . 'Zi..4...---".4':.„1:M;.':1.-.75.:'',.--',..?;'■=i".1.-.'7. ' .." ,..,...i.C..-fL'"-:'-'4,-.,=,,..-,,,,:" .: it4t.'...,..7'"P'..-"";..-...';''''''''.-?r,, ,..,^,--:,7:4._.f.-,.• 7...-,_.7.:' -'='-..:7----,,,,:'-'....':,..'.,..it: '•....:.:7- • ''',-.';!f.r.7. -.4.'-:::71'; ':Aj::,.-ftt•.:'::.:;;'- '7k,_;Y".....a...4;1.-.7.1......,IL....'. .i..f4.. :.;'. -2",'',.f=,--•,..,;'-::-...,. .'. ;'•..:=...•.,--2,•_,7;,:c'.•-•.. TYPic Al- . :_t_,,-.:...:,;--.•;--ir=--. ..-:-.,i,-.--.:=,,-- . . 4.....,-.;,;,-;'-`F.F.:•-‘‘."-t,..;:"':•:'.i.";.:;':.::i.:•_-'..- . --, ..,•"t":7:■_.1-...,.-:-:.7.,;,7-...,,....:.'...:„";':■ _ ;,,,.;,-;:t.z-,,....,-.,.....:-,,,,,ti.iet,,:f.tfr aV.■],'1::-7:SI-.-:,. .',-.1.:1.7.,+-:".7....4,'+''.......,7, ...4- '.th.72-,-,7-7...7.:.7:.••'''.9::,:: ;.Z...-.V. 4-'.:t'-.±...-i,t:;:i1--2:---::',...:"".: T•7:,.'..4..7=7.-0.. ,........"-7,-.. f+...j•-,.._Lt..„,.,„, , .,,..... _.„...,---f.-,,,,,,,,,,z,4-4,-..:,.1,-:,L7 ,L...T.'.-"1,,,-.)..=.4.-C-i:.1-'.. 7tS7..z.'''''O-M7r: StliZ.#.774!"-I-.4".''',,rtr`lf.:q-...• .0.-.74 -,i,q7. 41 .' • '''''-'- ::'- 31' '' .°..I ''7.''17-7T7'7 -'4N-,1P-ç. . - :•—•:'''';',. .",i7: •":74..."F"4410.t.:t•a-' -:'''.'...'7401. - ''' ' • ''''''=:'-- .7.1-,2".;'----7.,!"'",''''. .^'..'.:*- . . 7r.' .• -----. '`.',.--li,-t,v,'':: ::: t C ON s-r-zucr •,..-zo;i:T..4.--6.-.,..4,-.----.-._,........i-7.-- . . _ ..... . ,_, _., •.-...„,... . • - - ---, -,.---:,:.,-.-.;.4,-;.-...-1,..:- ,.,-.:L.I;-". .•- ''-' -- • - ',...‘;p:-.,."t"........-cil,-•_=.;-7,-...:..'. ...- -- • . • • . - • . . . - . • -- •- - - '-' -- ... --.'•..,..'%!7.- -,--!--....,4,- -•'•':'•• . ,. 'z.,-.-,.. ."--=•...-- .4--r--...1.'. .•:_;:.-_---•:..:,..;._-_-.7--. _-",-, ..:-- •.... ....,L,7.,;-‘-'--• -:-,-7,1..--..-*-- :f-.■7:ff."'.-1;ir".7=---• : -7,/,.'..".-41`.N.'1,1- -_-2%.:71,7-7'=f;'-'7..... .. ......;:.1 .• -■!.."...•...;--.f.---.....,;..i.,, . :•-•.,. ?..,.,• .--..."4:1 ....-71e, •. _..,41-,; . .. .. . . . .. PLAT Eao, - 24 PE 9 � . V.i . SNowS Ex1IT:Ne y r a 30' EASCMEIVT' ��ti 1Wcii vr o _o \ - \ . \ o w \ .0 _ • \ � o co \ co z PAUL LLOYD qa S36°0I'15"E \ IRON S?A - I7.87'.� FOUND P 513°54.30"E 329.98 •'�' 0�. 30' PRIVATE ROAD PROPERTY OF DATE PARRISH f� °' ,"t, V` 324.49 �� THIS- NI3°54130"W RE-ESTABLISHED BY OCK PILE FOUND LINE \ (�d PAUL LLOYD 8 BETHEL BAPTIST CHURCH V \ 1 d -t BErmUEm .r. .�f rth (aliilh. ' ran .. i•,•arrLy Y MORNDR Y ,.y�.�/ 4. AS CALCULATED BY �5�` 1.000 ! Atat. Twos. he forp,.. •:kg C,:rkifiCyte +, 0" ,�?5i w TS.C RD A C co.O• it ' i 4 otartiel ii. ', f 4' v 4GGORDANCE ':ITH _J�w.wj..-..w. :_� .. .4.... AI—C.._. "+. • • _ _ :�. { / 1"`tom )��•, s .. . f': ate` -k1,, -- ""1- -// '1 •'� .`,ti/;.,- 11 /•_�'... .1-'%.•1 j f's �� .'' Y— 553 ` n - .54 '•' :. .-.--- �▪ ; •_`-y J�-'/ '7 3 e • l I ri � • o. Cry r'-------- \• •' 7 � ' J lwwi.\ 1 0 0� w LOT5?�,.-�� •‘•'�. � • __�, u[-.': I " �' :/--/r.� i' ▪ "ti _�. i * —i \\� \ ' " T,� _ �7 \-A. te-`� (�� ' �� r • .T._.. 1 . -, `tip _.fY� .- \'.` .. _ ':"�`_ _ �•1,..,_v}.(.-,pl�� -. - ,'. ( i'-\'•r--�� ,i• /-yam! %in\__....• ` ; �%: �`^,(`-lr� ,1 riii '1- ^\ �� _- _/*---...' .0 \. - );rte -� `A'. . ' i/ '. '.3, • ( ' _•� {-_ S \..r —�' �:4 j� � ?. Sri i!u - ln` r . r i I r . � :e l 1 -K.______,576 ~V^\:\'„` ri � ��•�•p'� •-IL • ”_ '.. ` !; it J . 1.: ��:tae.. - .r. �\. .. � .lip '\. :1. 1 ::: !.._ �• �t�. ' i `�- ` N\�.`f n1- • \//� �. ` - .�_- LJl\� '' V!/j, /,'•r`=� 1, ('�'; _ •�•-.�-1 \\k.-, ,,8itiv „l .,.,_j� ?' 55'•• i • ...,.:,,.,,__r••_�` �,l'-1 �'J __�L���-•..�++, ,'1,`�J( ., „.. ... �� •' 1l I1' ,, ,. ,,• j, -- U \ ._ .;;j'• , r•., r 3976 . Y'} f}'?".1 err... 1 -i • �:1.-•1 _ _ - - •_-- �_ - -- �'� -_�.• .1^',';}�_l_.�=•'�' �.' �� 1 r)sscl �. �' ' V > f X15 • ' i' - .:fry-: -I', . i' ,,. . •'I: -�\--..) \` I :,f �7�, .jf���_,_„/e 1 . t i �— .��, i ..- .. !�• -•Terrrtir Crpe's• � � V,i -•==.:...-.„., ! .. ._ 1\4 �r 3974 l' -= —==;r... ssr.^-'-. a 7.�.�f \._IU •, ._ '1`Y`I• •• • , / I r -.i,`\) n J M` I• • .. 10 ,.4-,- - ----------- . .. .,_-,,,,,,: _.,.Vt-,... .- ...• -kr,- ,_-.g. ,“f--2-,-.4fi-..,-, -It ., 4 ' - ri ::-..?4,- - * , - , ,y4;.-_------ ...1:11ft....i.i.F.,----- -- • , r-c... ....----• -..,‘. ;,..*Tja,„:.,-. :.... 1., • iiii0"7-.:.-y."- 6 .-' $ .=,' -:::--;. - . _..;.- r-:"4,. "•_1:It'::.•44!-:-'- ,04; '-'7f---'' •.7,' -,'i- - -'7'..i- - - -,-+.4,',-.-.-'''-';•' .gW-k..:,=:';'••ri--' - --- -=?I•T•A'-': - --°•••4!"':-- .---- '-- : -'- '':.. "-t'T'-'_` -1'.74**4,Vt. ''f r;':..4-!e--,1 :- "':'-''Y:‘-'-_.- -.- 7....1 :• ^ l'''.2iiV. '.- -' .. 4.1i..---V--4-,?-.-_,-.-"'7' ' let.i...-.7*!-7'-'---:':%.-"*- ..--.--.-",:,!-''''4 ■71',- -:M--1.----- ',,,-..41.."4-7.. '' ,..,.,,-'',...-: • P 1. i 7 [ .'2■......4.7,..-... /.: i,,,t.._.,:.r.. ig,- - . l I.A.1,;:rmr...r.:44.,'-__,PkW, ,,,.„, ._1.-.,..A... , -.4,4'.-_,--: -":_--_= --ci.•__----z:, x.-kv.:.. -.tv,,t4,...._ _wt.- !-..' '-' •' --:---.^- 11.,-..-,7t,::...fir`-'-ir.7,(...0 ': ' ' ..i.-.X.:-...,A-V..".-._::-.. .--.t.,-,;V-,... • ,--:. - :--:r4ii,,,-. -.' -----. . ,• - . «i ,- 1,4- .•....-.-V•i7-: ---* - --- -4..,,..-•- .t.t. i''.. ;15.-"L,i,.% . . :-,. -.4;:,_.,.. ,. '- . .,-!•,..E• ie. '•- - it..1,. ti•-rrookr .- 4-' •,• '-1'!.;..:..,,i-...-- -,:•4: '''-'-''-7-.*''''-ii:".: --.-.4.47*•-1,-,2e.-4,Sz'a k^iir - .-.‘ , ''''.o- '`. •''''--.€e',..a'-----• ''- - --t- 1-i.„,*, . a..,.k. . 44-,,1 .% :-..4 :...,fr .4,-74 stN 1_ . ..v.... ..: 1W t'',..c'e..,-ACW --'---,,::-..' -je-# -• ---454.4-'--' : ''', ...,_ :• :0.`-r'Par .. , , ;...,,t-y •-'''';::-LX4--'•: - i ' :- ---:"..„-..,',.'. .•'...-tr-_-.::-.1...,,... .„-z.. A,......„... .., , .ea-0.400‘t17- -.. : :.'7,-•%. --- • --- .0.- -... It-2 ." ; ,,E••• ....._ ..„. -.... „„.,..;-..,',..:1'tif ,.. , ,.c.,' . , A.,,,.±.,1."--.. 17,- 11?.. .2?it.-:.Z741.;t• '''''',0,,.,4 ...., ':::,_"'i'''....._.t.......-- ,__.m- V . ' ' "'•• - ,-•:. "'La- -..' , - . ' •• '.:..--R-,:•.,r_.1.....! ' '' •,/''''' ''' -.• . .-' 1-*. C2--.'.r,_e' 4,6•,-----.77:::'- '2--:.• -- . -.:.:.;- '. -.--'dmiP-.-':-- - '', .. .*V-, ...- - '- ... - ' 4.41r tr -,- - ;r17-3M --- . -.-- - :. --we..:-,,-: .. —,_-,...,:--t:" . - 7' ' ''''.i::4 4.- •ler -.44' ..-.,'-' ...,F,-,,:i;'ii-Skli .;'i'.-: -',/, .1r.' •• , ,-. '-'1.A.---....e'.''' '' ' •-:', - AC;:-.....- ' 1. %:.64 :..:14. .. 1-.-'.. - 4 -.. 1 ' --'..4-- . --.t.-,.---'S. - - - A 4-.-..... . - .:1'1'4--- .„-....•-7:1•7--,_.,4r/ ----- ---.11;,,,,.-4:=- -... z-' '-"--q■---- - ,-.. -.• lir,- - .k.mi;. - a . . ,, - ...,_,,, ..' 1 , 01-44"i°--..s,-i_i,..,--'4•"-'-`,..-.- =:-'...... -,.7.- .... 4.:-.... -lc- . -..----I-.--• '. - - . .... c i ., . . .1 r"'--- ...- -11,... "`, -- .---le 23! -W'r"..6,_--'''':' '•-...: ...1.:r.:--7;0-- ,.10,.. ., ..,-_, .e.. r,......-._ kl!it--•;.;*'; - _ - -,--4.....-..:": -.' "- ..-4_-__"tr^,,r-r- -'-r-- . f.N. ,' 71411M.I' .4-... ' I -.,- . -...f.', .-C-+.!:'7::...:-.." .' ''i''''' '.7 r 1', ..,.- :,.f.;F.,-...'-'-- .*..,;,...,.,-4,- . •--:- -,..1":17:7'-'-..:"--4.e1-7--- j-I '.7.: iik.::,"--Z.:-..•: -..''',:-!; •:-"4:7---zL.. :461CZ*;':;' i,ii:_ip...A._,,r I ..-_, -.--_71_..-.,..., . ,dr........,-:--, , ots---.1.4"‘'"--. ,44 :,- ...,t....,F- ...r. - -.,. -- ----..-- ir •,••••.„. .- ''''' • ..11-'-7, . -_ ;_,...4...._____. ...--'-' 1-:-.-41'ft .44.e .:.-..w..F -7 itz- . - ,-,:,•,.,, .... ,.-.--4>,..-74. . ' ;. :4-.- ...:LA4"-.'.. : ..-4.-r:' -'-'..'7•.'-7''',7-{-er5..it'S!.4::-:I.r41... 71- . -LcZL.' - - , - .7f4.7"... . .. ' . .. 7,-.. - ■.._'; ,....-.4—...:_.410.7 . -_..'-.. .''..7 4' ' _7:- ....-. . . - :.-. A ''....- ..._:1 -,4,_: ,...;:.LW...,r...'"-t..—_=-4.,ik.-:--...47--F.,.:___,...'_._2%....71.1.-- _.L,,q-..,•.;..r' :61-cri5 411r-,-'. ,"..--fufi!' - AAA ' ',..'..'7. _.;._ .,,..!.k.P_,T.- , f.' 4 1- ....4,,,,y1,t-ia5,:,..- -...::.,-;.?-_.....;...,,j-.0,-;,--:,4•,-_- ....:i.r.-:--:t ,...„. _ .... be,_ - .,.,..,... ... . i,-, ..7.'f:.,-,7,7-"",-.. .4,-*,-,.,-.,,,,, Jt.'',■,-2- '.-74qtr, • .:;,....,:-.. ..„..4!:-......riot_••,i_--,4,..-1-- -- • It. , .4, --.-.:_4_-...,--.. ., - *40i. :12 t'''.7.140...7rik- =. -'-'", ''.'''-"Ille..ArtiliO. '':1--=-17;1.- - -4,-L--I ..0.- .41,rg zego_kk:-., ir.- I' T'''..1',.:`,.• -7•41OrT,- 7,-: A*0%,lia.c _ • 7.7,..- _,,,, , i"?,--I"_ *;.4k t Z, I 1- rft. .:,•• - •.-_, - -"'" - '; -'",":•,-_,-"; -.:'''..,=-- .•7"..- -'-r"""a --t:2-',-.- 'i-,-,,.1." -:au-2 "".- ...-..- .', A'7,...- -. '": -'= "-"4.4."'"`'* * 3 -- .z•7,' -:.'•'. )"-.6,_ . r,__,—';': .--r.-. ' i'!•.-'?"':,_:".-:.....-4'.-;17---- .•:,--'-----‘-.:t-a-,,- . -,' 7 r.:-:. -.7..-°-,-:,....r".- ..".. .,, . _s-ircir•...-.-',... -- - . ,,,,...... i i..,.. ,; - . V.Nol- i&r--"-Fr"'":''': ' -4, -•'-:-',-'-.Y. .,;`,-,.---,L,'`---.- ,,..._ir;-?.-.2i, . ,- ,'- ,:' '7,-. -•,,7L-:„:1/___,,__.---..-.; '.. .„.9,3-7 .>.- -_,..,,--,-1.-r.,..a.,!-..:,--r,..?. -A-.0; ;;-• _ ..- 1:,.. :,-:::,:!Y:- - . 4 - .. .. .., .,:- -• -'','--7".".7,'. ...,--,,,7: 7 :c,. ,-,^-.:-"7..,... ---7. ...--'L-1,' -.n 4 --- .., - . .. 4 " iiii4217.!,-i.% :, =.'"-',::"...:-'-:-----f--...--C - •-•-- "-----''' .-,:-,--:,.7-..z..79r- . .- .. ..-4 -- •i,..1%,-,..c. : , . ., . :....... --"....-, .,-; ,z, k..-. - r.ar-,- _. ,. •- ■,.. ..".."-'-.;,-1.'x..7.-g,-4 ,,,islai!,:',:-1•if4?-0-:- IIi:•' ...:.-7.. •,;,WekT, . - , . ,...sit. A , .Z. '54,', • ' '.- - '' .-". ''''-*.2'`-"'i•-...: ,..,,-. ._.,,,--..—L'x-..,--e—,41•Aphim..4---74:,It- f,jr-, .,• ; L:c.„::-.7'. - ..,:,+=',:--7---r_.7.i=z:,,..',-;5i.A.4 --i,r--,7-ti.-.t. ;1,-•-' :, ',--.4, - ,, -.--.:- -' ";.-„,,-,..:',1 . _ :_':.::-z--', :-.-• -1- -L-4-.4, r.,._„:"ff".4 1.4.fii4-7'ce,,-`...;_fr.-;3-c ';;;;,-..,--: .:'' r'l--;' .' ." ;,": ."-, __...-"-',:".-;.,..a1;:.•-.="ral. % .-I'''t '-;''!•-• '' . . - . ,- -.-,,.-,v.„......t';',,.,...2,„..:•-•-r- -,0-'•--17.-7--,•,7,274-t.... " ., - .. , . :- -... .,-:lc;... • --: ---.--,-.----k,r--',01 .: ,7... :.,-,....(4 .7..- :.;... t t5' -- 47i•:.:4,1-17 / -71-4-.4.7_,-.7,1,-,1,4-,:i.4,. ... ...„ . ...T..-,,Ti.:ar;2;,•02".}-,rat...k.,:..41 r- ‘..-!';if;i,,.,c1....,T.7,_.=-‘,.. ,_ : :-,,,-,,,..--;-. 4..-. . ,- . .-_-"L,‘..',.,1,..-S.5-..7.'-..r-•-„:;i1,--.:•?--•-,..:-,._--,_-:,,.4--'‘--,_f.`7,"7.-_.:-;,-.:,7-.,.-k0.,='..,1.,-;.,..--,4,.,.,..i7...,,:;-;4,.-...-.-t,-..,:-.,-,-.!+,._-,:;4;_:-7.5-.::,---i,;%-r,e 7:i,,La-:.,.,.,,..-.,...--,44:-,.',.7,---,.-..4...''-...-;.,,‘,,,-_,:,,',...-,--.:-,;:7-,,,-*.-..„.,-.,..,7:._:-....':-;.,.1,(-,-_'.;,.-::.-,•:-..:..-7--%...,:-L,-,-...C:1,„,:-k",.,.;4_i,-,...,c,.ao,o.1_:,.,:_,.'..Y.-7;L-,..4'-.-,.'ae.-,;.:'..;t1-,,";-.,.:,i-t!--,-•--,,...":.I.....-,.-,.-1,..3:„,,i,4.....-7-..-`..#:.t...,.:..--,---j.-.---7=---:,,7--„.t.-,.,2,..=.:,Z`4.,.-?.,,1.;..1:.-,.;,‘..":f.„-,...7.-r.:...-,---,...,..-:..'2,:,-.--,4.:,.,.,-.-.,:..t,-.1;-t,,,..7'.-:.‘,r:-...'-''.-,..4-:.,„-,',.--:7::,;,`,4.;.,'_.'-..:.-.-,.L,s..,.,'.,,..,i:..-.-7,•-,‘.-.-:;--,..7„.,7-.,i:.,‘r.,.,.7,,_.. 4-t.'--_;cg7.=4•-1..4,.7”,'•a t•. .t•;.-,_..'._-_--%-;-,..,..1:-...1-7:, .. 1 . _. .. .1. -..: ir;1--.4,.,,-i•.., - — -7', •• r ._ ::.7_,-7.'_, -: -, _._--'-._.'-7,..7-:-..=-..-' ---,' = .-_ ....',!,..-1;- :-- •■:. ,.."'•,-,.,....,,..4--' '-.. . .- - -- - ..:"--,- ---- i ..:77---",..," - ''''''''-'-'-----:.-.-'.;?41.-_-,: -..'.......=.44...w....;,,'.■ •P'1. .-::. . ..._ - - - _, -, . .._ -:-,- -74;7r,At - - ,. :,.a.- _ -.. . -- .--..--.:-..:..-77,-.... -.. ..,..4---..-.:_-.;,,-,..,_,-.'rr,,,_ -,._...- .. •- • . , - . ''' "... '-'i-.-:'72.,:.;:grx,•- • ,f S.' - -..;,4et..7..-!;. -=.- -_ --:-:-..,1-,...,._ , - . „. . ,.... --. - . ..' .- ' - -.._='. ..- - -.• ,-7--,-:-......•'.:''', ....''' , m.—:':-. "'.--.. ...1.-. .,-- ' .-',.:. :.+: ...-7..... .-........ 7'..Tr....%.- '-''''''-'• -- ' ' - --'--;:' :::-..- --;...'-;- .. '4i.: .. .' 4 - -..-....",..71.' '.'7,-,-.:",..-'.:e--;:.,...;-,-K7r:,.-'—...;;;;•,'"---t:— -L' . ';•.,. ,.?"-t, .'- . - - . .: -.'" .--,-7-' .--,- -i-!-Lr-.;--.'-',..t.:•-•,•-.4't.f -i-'' 4:L',, --•-t.'-' r ' - - -7....--_ '- ';.-' - 7- .,..a.- :. . ....., .. „. . ' - - .__.le .- - • -----...---"..-",------.-- -.1-. ,... ' . . ' - _ - - - DRAFT PB MINUTES 5-19-86 1 1 C PAGE 13 AGENDA ITEM #7g: DATE AND LOVIE PARRISH MINOR SUBDIVISION - PARTIAL WIDTH R/W 1111. Presentation by Smith. The purpose of this agenda item is to consider a request for a partial width right-of-way of 30 feet to serve a two (2) lot minor subdivision on property known as Chapel Hill Township Map 112 Lot 34 (Date 8 Lovie Parrish property) for recommendation to the Board of Commissioners. An existing 30 foot private road from Bethel-Hickory Grove Church Road (SR 1104) serves the Parrish property. The Parrish family owns Lots 6, 34, 6B and 6A on Tax Map 112. They are unable to obtain additional easement from either Lot 3 (Elsie Lloyd property) or Lot 33 (Bethel Baptist Church property) and cannot subdivide their land unless a partial width right-of-way is approved. If a partial width right-of-way is approved a minor subdivision of two lots for sale to family members would be possible. The Planning Staff recommends approval . Smith noted that this 30 foot partial width right-of-way is applicable only to this subdivision. Any future subdivision must come back to the Planning Board for approval . MOTION: Pilkey moved approval . Seconded by Walters. VOTE: Unanimous. AGENDA ITEM #7h: CLASS A ROAD - PHYLLIS ARNOLD MINOR SUBDIVISION Presentation by Smith . The purpose of this agenda item is to consider a request for a Class A private road to serve the new one ( 1 ) acre lot of Phyllis Arnold . The Orange County Private Road Standards requires the approval of the Board of County Commissioners for establishment of a Class A private road through the subdivision procedures . Board of Commissioners ' approval of a Class A private road is required before a minor subdivision served by this road can be approved for the Phyllis Arnold lot. Currently 11 lots are served by the private road known as Wilson Road. O R A N G E C O U N T Y 111 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Meeting Date 17, Action Aurnda SUBJECT: CLASS A ROAD PHYLLIS ARNOLD MINOR SUBDIVISION Item DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes X No Attachment(s) Information Contact: APPLICATION JANET VAN HANDEL TAX MAP ORIGINAL SURVEY DRAFT 5-19-86 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 PURPOSE: To consider a request for a Class A private road to serve the new one ( 1 ) acre lot of Phyllis Arnold for approval . To receive the Planning Board 's recommendation . NEED: The Orange County Private Road Standards requires the approval of the Board of County Commissioners for establishment of a Class A private road through the subdivision procedures. Approval by the Board of Commissioners of the proposed Class A private road is required before a minor subdivision served by this road can be approved for the Phyllis Arnold lot. Currently 11 lots are served by the private road known as Wilson Road. IMPACT: A minor subdivision of the Phyllis Arnold tract could occur if a Class A road is approved by the Board of Commissioners. RECOMMENDATION: The PLanning Board recommends approval . ■ j MINOR SUBDIVISION APPLICATION if ra Q. / zer 4,,,...be. ': .. .- . . . Property Owner(s) % ' / Address ' 5170 r VMS Phone (9 ) fli Developer/Contact Name ice, „C,G,. -.ems.,./. � Address �a " � I� i "� .�jc7) 7Q 4 6 o C iLocation of Property /1 /37 d township map block lot Zoning R -K Fire District (....:, 0 ' Watershed ^ ____ Impervious Surface Joint Planning C.H. • . - ---- Carrboro ---- School District S%? .CJ State Road Number Name 614;,.. , /249 TYpe SteZitch _. A 4474_44 % Private Road Class • C, Name Atura",..,•_ 1.1g.. . • . Do you plan to build the road before final approval? iVe2.9 ' or secure construction with a security document? Utilities: Public Sewer 1 Community System Septic Tank Public Water Community Water Well If on a septic system, the Health Department must examine all existing and potential building sites on lots shown on the plat. • Total Lot Area 642 aL&1. " Number of Lots 2 , (r LC. t, 6 I Lot Number: Size of Lots: rl structures (proposed or existing) : 2 ) 44063.q , Za 5, 8 . AA_ ,LA:d6A.44 A..- , 1 I (We) hereby certify that I (we) have read the above information and that the information I (we) have supplied is accurate to the best of my (our) knowledge. I (we) understand . my (our) application is not complete and cannot --e approved unless -- .1 required 'nformation and ma terial jhas been provided. / ‘ ////q/t • Allik Date Signature Date Signature Filing Fee # of Lots Fee Private Road Fee Other Fee Total Fees Date Paid I OMITTED- 3, 15,16,17,18,2,8,604, 19C , . i. ._. , : . , • s I 4; . 1 e! i 3 11 1.66 ectivat I 7345 0 I AC. 37 m Q l 6 . 0 1.24 4,111/\\ 03 1 1.441 C.523) \\� 12.98 AC. 1 16.86 AC. �\CN 85QA� 0198 13 I 1 .• sale 0 1 130 z ---\— — I AC. 7934 I 7 2 .1865 1.91AC• 28.23 AC, 8 t�� . >�w iz0� ELpI�rNF� O � ,� _ NIL$ 3 �• . 5 4 Iq•2 t 6 I 0'°_' � r ' �1 R . 50 PR RN4-r 35 I�•N'�W LO i.; Rom>. 30 _ ;3E $ O NO.Te:A gi . • CD 9.99 AC. Q327 I 6.32 AC. a : . 14.52 AC. 028a -.41s9 in 1MSW liar 1 9 t 6.32 AC- 1147 en 4,96. 682A;7C ■ �t ;j3.36AC.0c �, PH yti.uS AIt46 PaciPeltmr? ___________j_ % -.., +' Ii N 848 000 8120 Ec MAP 17A / 1 SECS la � / ( ( WILLOW RIDGE J .. . - • 1-- .. . _ .__ i i . 114 PLAT Boalg « . 1 t4 033NS °R1416i , & w11•5 y � . ,b0'£S01 3„SZ,05 c69 N r r—"-70700£ ,00'51£ 3 R vE 1 ,oa=��� ,fi0'£11 • � . 4 .s P It- it 01 0 d >10019,� aI,0 1 tV Lc__fp• , , - h o r+lp aIo - ato v tI$ Li . la _ 4 �w' r 0 d b► ti 3 . c, y 7 I N toy. Q :.:C:11:lat T- �N `��o► er> �'la +1 Q c1 t0 ! O �M 110 6Z•bbl • 9•L9 �1 r H p C 3. 14e- di t>j yg44G 3.2 9id.LN t. l � � �1L=03y�. L1 $, l . 3 z grlbE r. °g `a N o N N Q p N'r~7 3 ^-+ ;F ern - 0! s- bbl _N u1 01 in N I C -$.04 L- N r, p - N a� �.� o N �3 9.J -.2 O is a+ .1 G;o, CO Co rg'q04 al`aa•-•'_ 4r>ra f9 t qb'Zbi y t�y �Uy 900�o y,+mil_ d+ FAZep9N 'NOS�1M!-� %aA9� e•"•'i"' 4�S4N 3 �L+ N�'°_'yo.� pi0�1 0 a 3 as ,,r Aozrza� , i,; __ .�.ac°Ele J o �-W, ' 8Z 66Z sera ?••acc��`-�'^ Z6'sb1 6SO ` —i v S f9 tr bti ib=� v'U o 4 D tC 9P1 _ + 1 , I ! /C 'v I IiirL- lz N \I a) O_ v w R 3 Z i0+1 Q -c Q ° -� a v N M , H1 - M o ,�+I N 7 . . N V %N+1 O K I` N O m n v to tlY I Q lD Cf 1 d K1 .D 1�+] ,� -C N Of C co o I Ot 'p 2 cL; m 1'S O Y tD �; co I N ( � �- N v �He Nooi e„ I z 1—'99- ,as;,sZ ,00'2ea 44 1 ,OS`b8E ,00-18Z Z9z ,39'yZbi M„b0,b506t't5 A j1d03 -a Ili DRAFT PB MINUTES 5-19-86 PAGE 13 AGENDA ITEM #7g: DATE AND LOVIE PARRISH MINOR SUBDIVISION - PARTIAL WIDTH R/W Presentation by Smith. The purpose of this agenda item is to consider a request for a partial width right-of-way of 30 feet to serve a two (2) lot minor subdivision on property known as Chapel Hill Township Map 112 Lot 34 (Date & Lovie Parrish property) for recommendation to the Board of Commissioners. An existing 30 foot private road from Bethel-Hickory Grove Church Road (SR 1104) serves the Parrish property. The Parrish family owns Lots 6, 34, 6B and 6A on Tax Map 112. They are unable to obtain additional easement from either Lot 3 (Elsie Lloyd property) or Lot 33 (Bethel Baptist Church property) and cannot subdivide their land unless a partial width right-of-way is approved. If a partial width right-of-way is approved a minor subdivision of two lots for sale to family members would be possible. The Planning Staff recommends approval . Smith noted that this 30 foot partial width right-of-way is applicable only to this subdivision . Any future subdivision must come back to the Planning Board for approval . MOTION: Pilkey moved approval . Seconded by Walters. VOTE: Unanimous. 14 GENDA ITEM #7h: CLASS A ROAD - PHYLLIS ARNOLD MINOR SUBDIVISION Presentation by Smith . The purpose of this agenda item is to consider a request for a Class A private road to serve the new one ( 1 ) acre lot of Phyllis Arnold . The Orange County Private Road Standards requires the approval of the Board of County Commissioners for establishment of a Class A private road through the subdivision procedures. Board of Commissioners ' approval of a Class A private road is required before a minor subdivision served by this road can be approved for the Phyllis Arnold lot. Currently 11 lots are served by the private road known as Wilson Road . lie DRAFT PB MINUTES 5-19-86 PAGE 14 A minor subdivision of the Phyllis Arnold tract could occur if a Class A road is approved by the Board of Commissioners. MOTION: Shanklin moved appoval . Seconded by Pilkey. VOTE: 8 in favor. 2 opposed (Best, Jacobs) . Smith noted that problems will increase over time regarding 10 acre lots with private roads which are perhaps being purchased for future subdivision. Chair Jacobs noted that his reason for voting against Homestead Highlands was that due to the complexity, he felt it should have come in as a planned development. Smith informed the Board that Planning Staff has beat . directed to identify possible school sites by the County Manager. The two factors are 35 acre size lots and certain areas. AGENDA ITEM #8a: COURTESY REVIEW - TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH NORTH FAIRVIEW PARK - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Presentation by Smith . Smith noted that this park was scheduled for development as part of the original funding for the community development project known as North Fairview. There was no money set aside for the development of a community park, but it was part of the overall plan approved for the residential development. She noted that Orange County has requested a Special Use Permit from the Town of Hillsborough for this park and the Town Board has asked that the County Planning Board comment on this project. Smith presented the plans for the park as included in the handout materials. Kizer inquired about fencing. Smith responded there would be some fencing around the fields but not around the park . Kizer continued asking how close the park is to residences. Smith responded this is adjacent to the abandoned landfill and there are residences on all other sides of the park . Kizer asked about elevation. Smith responded everything in the park is about 640 - 650. She noted there is mature vegetation which has not been cleared in a long while. Hubbard inquired what will be done with the abandoned O R A N G E C O U N T Y BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS hi ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date June 17, 1986 Action Ada Item # SUBJECT: RECLASSIFICATION OF QUAKER LAKE AND GRAHAM-MEBANE WATERSH DS DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes x x No Attachment(s) Information Contact: SUSAN SMITH REQUEST LETTER RESOLUTION Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 PURPOSE : To adopt a resolution of support for the City of Graham's request for reclassification of Quaker Lake and Graham-Mebane watersheds. NEED: The City of Graham is requesting reclassification of the two referenced watersheds under the new classifiicatio.n system and has requested Orange County 's support. Under the current classification- scheme these two watersheds are designated A- II . The current classification provides no distinction between headwater water supplies with no or few sources of pollution and run-of- the-river supplies or impoundments which have numerous potential sources of point and non-point pollution . The proposed classifications (WS- i , WS- II , WS- III ) are defined according to the amount and types of permitted point source discharges and include a land use management requirement to control non-point sources of pollution. All waters currently classified as A- II will initially be classified as WS- III . Reclassification of these waters will be conducted on a case-by-case basis following the development of a land use management plan by the local authority and will require a public hearing. IMPACT: A resolution of support may result in reclassification of the watersheds to the more protected class WS- I . A reclassification to WS- I would provide recognition of and incentive for potential users to select more protected sources or take actions to protect existing sources. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the resolution of support . 116 RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING 'THE RECLASSIFiCfTlON OF QUAKER LAKE AND GRAHAM-MEBANE WATERSHEDS FROM WS-Ill TO WS-l . WHEREAS, The North Carolina Environment Management Commission proposes to adopt and implement new descriptive classifica tions for water supply watersheds to provide more appropriate protection for surface water supplies used as ar-aw water source for drinking water; and WHEREAS, The City Council of The City of Graham :teas peti- tioned the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission to reclassify the Quaker Lake and -proposed Graham-Mebane Reservoir watersheds from WS- III to WS-I ; and WHEREAS, Orange County supports a comprehensive vare:r supply watershed management program throughout the County„ including • the Back Creek Reservoir Watershed Critical Area Treatment program; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, The Board of County Commissioners of Orange County supports the resolution (attached) requesting the reclassification of Quaker Lake Watershed and proposed Graham-Mebane Watershed from WS-- iII to Ws- l . ' Adopted this the 17th day of June, 1986. DON WILLHOIT, CHAIR ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: Beverly Blythe, Clerk Orange County Board of Commissioners I. • • t � �reitpof revi - P.O. Drawer 357 • . Graham, North Carolina 27253 Telephone - (919) 228-8362 = 1 1.�. May 7,. 1986 Mr. Kenneth Thompson County Manager Orange County Hillsborough, N. C. 27278 - - Dear. Mr. Thompson: - • We are enclosing a copy of a Resolution adopted by the Graham City Council at their meeting May 6, 1986 concerning reclassification _ of Quaker Lake Watershed and the proposed Graham-Mebane watershed.. We are requesting your support of this reclassification of the ' watersheds. Ver truly yours, 'Vet, /4" , .. . , % i Ray F'oc l -clan, City -itaR er RF:jgm . encl: r } RESOLUTION REQUESTING RECLASSIFICATION OF - ' QUAKER LAKE WATERSHED AND PROPOSED GRAHAM--MEBANE .WATERSHED - FROM WS-III TO WS-I - . WHEREAS, the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission proposes to adopt new improved description classifications for water supply watersheds to provide more appropriate protection for surface water supplies used as a raw water source for drinking water; and WHEREAS, ,the Quaker Lake watershed and the proposed Graham-Mebane Reservoir watershed that are now classified WS-III appear to meet the requirements for the WS-I classification of the proposed designation; and WHEREAS, the reclassification of the Quaker Lake watershed and the proposed Graham-Mebane Reservoir waE-ershed to WS-I will be to the benefit of the health and welfare of .the present and future customers dependent upon- these water supply sources NOW, THEREFORE, BE 'IT RESOLVED: _ 1 . That the City Council of the City of Graham petitions the North Carolina. Environmental Management Commission to reclassify- the Quaker Graham-Mebane Reservoir watersheds that are now classified as t to the classification of WS-1 promptly upon adoption of the new watershed classifications. 2. That the Mayor of the City of Graham is authorized and directed to file such necessary applications, furnish the appropriate information, and take such other action as needed to support the consummation of the reclassification requests. 3. That copies of this resolution be forwarded to Alamanc. _ County, Orange County and the Town of 1•`ebane, along with a request of support i:sr this reclassification of the watersheds. - Adopted this 6th day of May, 1986. i rt (----kiLl., ,. ft.,163_____ H I () Troy G: y Woodard, Mayor Attest: -/.1 21- 4 4/ 71I ie .1/ C:i%y Clerk: t -� ORANGE -CO►E,TV BOARD, OF COM ISSIONERS - ACTION AGENDA ACTION AGENDA ITEJ4 ABSTRACT ITEM MO, 5 MEETING DATE June 18 _986 ti - 121 SUBJECT: Proposed Budget Amendments - • DEPARTMENT: Finance. _ PU3l�IG HEARING: __:YI;S x NO .�~� __ ATTACHMENT(S): . 4 . INFORMATION .CONTACT: Donna Wagner • Proposed Budget Amendment - PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH - 732- 8181 HILLSBOROUGH - 732-9361 . . - " CHAPEL HILL - 967-9251•• MMEt3ANE - 227-2031 - DURHAM 688--7331 PURPOSE: Consideration of proposed budget amendment. • • NEED: . The Board of Commissioners approved contracts with North Carolina Memorial - Hospital for the purpose of providing county dispatchers and paramedics -for the air ambulance program. In order to employee these personnel and fulfill the contract requirements, an approved budget is necessary. IMPACT: All cost to Orange County will be reimbursed by North Carolina Memorial Hospital; therefore, no budgetary impact is expected. Rf:C:O?;'; DATI U;.(S) : Approve budget amendment to establish EMS-Air Ambulance (In-Flight) budget. 12 ORANGE COUNTY PROPOSED 1985-86 BUDGET AMENDMENT The 1985-86 Budget Ordinance as adopted on July 3, 1985, and subsequently amended, is hereby amended as follows: BEFORE AFTER AMENDMENT AMENDMENT AMENDMENT EMS - AIR AMBULANCE Appropriation: EMS - Air Ambulance $ 0 $33,737 $33,737 Source: N.C. Memorial Hospital 0 33,737 33,737 To establish EMS - Air Ambulance budget. 12 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NO. F MEETING DATE JUNE 17, 1986 SUBJECT: LEASE RENEWAL WITH JOCCA *********************************************************************** DEPARTMENT: PURCHASING & CENTRAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEARING YES NO ************************************************************************** ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: PAM JONES EXT 497 Lease Renewal Agreement Original 1983 Lease PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH 732-8181 HILLSBOROUGH 732-9361 CHAPEL HILL 967-9251 MEBANE 227-2031 DURHAM 688-7331 ************************************************************************** PURPOSE: To approve lease renewal between Joint Orange-Chatham Community Action, Inc. (JOCCA) and the County of Orange for space at the Cedar Grove Multipurpose center, Cedar Grove, North Carolina. NEED: An agreement was entered into in August, 1983 between JOCCA and the County to provide space to be used as a Community Center in Cedar Grove. The tenant is desirous that this agreement be continued for an additional one year period commencing July 1, 1986 and ending at 12: 00 midnight on June 30, 1987. All terms of the lease as drawn, amended and approved in 1983 remain the same. IMPACT: JOCCA will continue operation of Community Center at Cedar Grove, as in the past. RECOMMENDATION: Approve lease renewal July 1, 1986 through June 30 , 1987, between Joint Orange-Chatham Community Action, Inc. and the County of Orange for space to be used as a Community Center at the Cedar Grove Multi- purpose Center, Cedar Grove, North Carolina. LEASE AGREEMENT 124 RENEWAL NORTH CAROLINA gRANGE COUNTY WHEREAS , A lease agreement was made and entered into as of the 29th day of August, 1983 by and between Orange County, LOME and Joint Orange-Chatham Community Action, Inc. , TENANT , for space to be used as a Community Center as the Cedar Grove Multipurpose Center, Cedar Grove, North Carolina. WHEREAS , the LEIS PE and the TENANT wish to renew the lease agreement as amended. NOW THEREFOR , LESSOR and TENANT mutually agree to the following: (1) The lease agreement will be continued for a period of one year commencing on July 1, 1986 and ending at 12:00 midnight on the day of June 30, 1987. (2) All other terms and conditions will remain the same. This agreed to, the day of ____ 1986. LESSOR: Orange County BY: Don Willhoit Chairman, Orange County Board of Commissioners ATTEST: TENANT: Joint Orange-Chatham Community Action, Inc. PAGE 1 LEASE AGREEMENT 12c NORTH CAROLINA ORANGE COUNTY T EASE GREEr1ENT MAOE THIS . .2 C7 v�+Y �;F . .. HE_� , 1y. BET;IFEN (IRAAGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLI,,4A. . 1-t(tSE PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS 106 EAST r1ARGARtT LANE, HILLS00k0uC.h, NORTH CAROLINA, HEREINAFTER CALLED THE LESSOR AND JOINT ORANGE CHATHAM COMMUNITY .ACTION 'NHOSE PRINCIPAL OF PLACE OF BUSINESS IS: PITTSBORu, NORTH CAROLINA HEREINAFTER CALLED THE TENANT. NITNESSETH IN C-ONSIDERATIOPN OF THE MUTUAL BENEFITS TO THE LESSOR AND TO THE TENANT, AND OF THE CONVENA STS ANO AGREEMENTS UPON THE PART OF THE LESSOR AND THE TENANT TO BE KEPT AND PERFORMED, THE LESSOR NENEt3Y DEMISES AND LEASES TO THE TENANT, AND THE TENANT LEASES AND TAKES FROM THE LESSOR THE PREMISES SHOWN ON THE FLOUR PLAN ATTACHED HtRE TO AS EXHIBIT A AND BY REFERENCE MADE 4 PART HERE OF (HEREIN CALLED THE LEASED PREMISES) LOCATED AT: CEDAR GROVE MI.JLTIPURPOSF CENTER Ai(1RE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A, ATTACHED HERE TO 6E OCCUPIED A.10 USED AS A COMmU1)ITY CENTER AND FUR THE 7ERAS AND CONDITIONS HEREIN SET FORTH. ( 1 ) TERM OF LEASE: THE TER'n HEREOF SHALL COMMENCE ON THE FIRST DAY OF JA+QUAKY , 19).0) AND SHALL END AT 12: 00 MIDNIu T UN THE 30TH uF JUNE, 148£4. (2) RENTAL: TENANT SHALL PAY TO THE LESSOR THE SUv OF TWELVE THOUSAND, SIX HUNDRED, SEVENTY TO DOLLARS (12,672.00) PER ANNUM, PAYABLE_ IN MONTHLY INSTALLMENTS OF ONE THOUSAND, FIFTY SIX DOLLARS (1,056.00) EACH DUE UN THE FIRST DAY OF EACH MONTH, I. DVA.'*CE OUnING THE TERM OF THIS LEASE . THIS RENT SHALL 9E SUSPENDED IN FArtuP OF INKING CONTRIHUTIUN FROM THE LESSOR TO THE TENANT . (3) UTILITIES: THE TENANT SHALL PAY FOR ELECTRICITY AND FUEL FUR HEAT BASED O THE FOLLuaING FON+1ULA : TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE USED iSY TENANT (2rh14 SG. FT. ) DIVIDED eY TOTAL USABLE SiiUARE FOOTAGE OF THE BUILDINi; aHEPE THE LEASED PROPERTY IS LOCATED; (33, 773 Si. , FT. ) , TImES THE AMOUNT AS THE ELECTRICITY AND FUEL FOR HEAT BILLS RECEIVED HY THE LESSOR 0UKIvG THE TERM OF THIS LEAST FOR THE BUILDING AHFRE THE LEASED PROPERTY IS LOCA l E0. THE LESSOR SHALL SEND THE TEn;4AjT ON A TIMELY BASE= A STATC)1ENT ITEMIZING SUCH UTILITY CMARGtS. PNYwENT SHALL BE DUE TO Tr;E LESSOR ITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE RATE ON THE STATE,ntNTS. Ti;E LESSOR SHALL PAY FOR ALL WATER AND SE LR CHARGES. O8 :27 : 48 01 JuN 1983 PAGE 2 12t- (4) CARE ANU REPAIR OF PREMISES: THE TENANT SHALL COMmI T 00 ACTIVE WASTE AND SHALL TAKE GOOD CAE OF THE PREMISES AND THE FIXTURES AND APPURTENANCES THEREIN, AND SHALL, IN USE ANO OCCUPANCY OF THE PREMISES, CUNFOR0 TO ALL LA.vS, ORDERS AND REGUL.ATIUNS nF THE FEDERAL, STATE AND MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT, AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF INSURERS, APPLICABLE TU THE PREMISES. THE TENANT AI.LL PROVIDE JANITORIAL SERVICES SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, TRASH REMOVAL, WINuOw CLEANINNG, FLUOR AND ciALL CLEANING, DUSTING, LIGHT utLB REPLACEMENT AND - ALL OTHER ACTIVITIES NECESSARY TO KEEP THE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR OF THE LEASED PREMISES IN A CLEAN PRESENTABLE STATE. THE LESSOR SHALL MAINTAIN AND OPERATE THE HEATING , AIR—COAOITIUNING, ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING SYSTEMS AS WELL AS PERFORM THOSE REPAIRS AND mAINTENANCE DUTIES AS THE LESSOR DEEMS NECESSARY A1O APPROPRIATE, INCLUDING SN[lw REMOVAL, CUTTING OF GRASS AND TRIMMING OF SHkUHS AND TREES. (5) INTERRUPTION OF SERVICE: THE LESSOR SHALL NOT BE OR F3ECUME LIABLE FOR DAMAGES TO TENANT ALLEGED TO BECAUSE OR OCCASSIONE') 3Y OF IN ANY NAY CONNECTED TAI TH UR THE RESULT OF ANY INTERRUPTION, DEFECT OR BREAKDOWN FROm ANY CAUSE WHATEVER IN ANY OF THE SERVICES HEREIN REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPHS 3 AND 4 ABOVE. HOT+EVER UPON RECEIPT OF ACTUAL NOTICE OF ANY SUCH INTERRUPTION, DEFECT, DR HREAKDOwN, LESSOR WILL TARE SUCH STEPS AS ARE REASONABLE TO RESTORE ANY SUCH INTERRUPTED SEPVICE OR TO REMEDY ? NY SUCH DEFECT. (o) ALTERATIONS: ANY ALTERATION, Ai)DITIO+VS, IMPROVEMENTS OR PARTITIONS, ExCEPTI ',G THOSE PARTITIONS TO dE FURNISHED BY LESSOR, PERMITTED HEREIN SHALL dE MADE AT THE EXPENSE OF THE TENANT . THE TENANT AGREES THAT TENANT HILL MAKE NO ALTFRATIOiVS, ADUITIU!`:S UR IMPROVEM.ENTS TO THE LEASED PREMISES NI THOUT THE WRITTEN CuNSE uT OF THE LESSOR AND THAT ALL ALTERATIONS, ADDITIONS OR IMPROVEMENTS MADE BY AND FOR THE TENANT, INCLUDING 'UT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY AND ALL SUBDIVIDING PARTITIONS, WALLS, SPECIAL PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL FIXTURES UR RAILINGS OR WHATEVER TYPE, f,+ATERIAL OR HEIGHT, BUT EXCEPTING MOVABLE OFFICE FURNITURE PUT IN AT TH' EXPENSE OF THE TENANT, SHALL, ►SHEN •MADE, BE THE PROPERTY OF THE LESSOR AND SHALL REMAIN UPON AND HE SURRENDERED tITh THE LEASED PNEmisES AS A PART THEREOF AT THE EXPIRATION OR EARLIER TtRMINATIUN OF THIS LFASr . THE LESSOR. hOwEVF_R, RESERVES . THE RIGHT TO RE4UIRE THE TENA'N1 10 RENOVE ANY PANELING, DECORATIONS, PARTITIONS, WALLS, RAILINGS, FLOUR COVERINGS, BOOTHS, PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL FIXTURES OR OFFICE FURNITI►RE INSTALLED BY OR AT THE REQUEST OF THE TENANT, ►sY GIViNG NOTICE OF SUCH ELECTION TO THE TENANT AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO, OR NOT LATER THAN TEN DAYS AFTER, THE EXPIRATION UR EARLIER TERMINATION OF THIS LEASE OR a DATE FIVE DAYS AFTER THE GIVING OF SUCH NOTICE, :,HICHEVER SHALL dE THE LATER. (7) RIG;•iT OF ENTRY : THE TENANT AGREES THHAT. THE LESSOR SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO EvTEN 08: 27 :51 '31 JUN 1983 PAGE 3 12`� AND TO GRANT LICENSES TO ENTER THE LEASED PREMISES AT ANY REASONABLE TIME AFTER HAVING GIVEN THE TENANT NOTICES OF ITS INTENT TO SO ENTER (A) TO EXAMINE THE LEASED PREMISES, (B) TO MAKE ALTERATIONS AND REPAIRS TO THE LEASED PREMISES OR TO THE BUILDING ( INCLUDING THE RIGHT, DURING THE PROGRESS OF SUCH ALTERATIONS OR REPAIRS, TO KEEP AND STORE WITHIN THE LEASED PREMISES ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS, TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT) , (C) FOR ANY PURPOSE riHICH THE LFSSUR MAY DEEM NECESSARY FOR THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE BUILDING, OR (D) TO EXHIBIT THE LEASED PREMISES TO APPLICANTS. NO SUCH ENTRY SHALL IN ANY MANNER AFFECT THE OBLIGATIONS AND CUNVENANTS OF THIS LEASE. (8) USE AND OCCUPANCY: TENANT AGREES THAT THE LEASED PREMISES WILL NE USED ONLY FOR THE PURPOSE HEREINBEFORE SET OUT IN THIS LEASE, THAT NO UNLAWFUL USE OF THE LEASED PREMISES WILL BE MADE, THAT NO SIGN, NAME, LEGEND, NOTICE OP ADVERTISEMENT OF ANY KIND WILL . BE FIXED, PAINTED OR DISPLAYED ON ANY PART OF THE BUILDING, EXCEPT THAT THE NAME AND BUSINESS OR PROFESSION OF THE TENANT MAY BE PAINTED WITH APPROPRIATE LETTERING APPROVED BY THE LESSOR ON THE DOOR OR DOORS TO THE SPACE LEASED BY THE TENANT OR AS OTHERWISE AGREED TO BY THE LESSOR: AND UPON THE TERMINATION OF THIS LEASE, TENANT WILL VACATE AND SURRENDER POSSESSION . OF THE LEASED PREMISES TO THE LESSOR IN AS GOOD CONDITION AS THE LEASED PREMISES WERE AT THE COMMENCEMENT OF THIS LEASE, ORDINARY WEAR AND TEAR EXPECTED. THE LESSOR RESERVES THE RIGHT TO USE THE LEASED PREMISES FOR ANY REASONABLE PURPOSE, AS LONG AS THE USE OF SUCH PREMISES DOES NOT UNDULY AFFECT THE OPERATION OF THE TENANT. THE LESSOR SHALL BE THE FINAL ARBITOR OF WHETHER THE PROPOSED USE BY THE LESSOR UNDULY AFFECTS THE OPERATION OF THE TENANT. THE LESSOR AGREES TO ALLOW THE TENANT TO HAVE USE OF THE KITCHEN AND DINING ROOM FACILITIES LOCATED IN THE PREMISES ON AN AS NEEDED BASIS. THE TENANT. AGREES TO PROPERLY CLEAN THE KITCHEN AND DINING AREA AND EOUJPmENT TO SANITATION GRADE A STANDARDS AS ISSUED SY THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA AFTER EACH USE . IT IS UNDERSTOOD BY THE TENANT THAT SECTION 9, INSURANCE, AND SECTION 10, INDEMNITY, OF THIS LEASE SHALL ALSO APPLY TO THE USE OF THE KITCHEN. THE LESSOR RESERVES THE RIGHT TO SCHEDULE AND/OR REGULATE THE USE OF THE KITCHEN FACILITIES IN SUCH A WAY TO INSURE EQUITABLE AND PROPER USE OF THE FACILITIES BY ANY PARTY AUTHORIZED BY THE LESSOR TO USE SUCH FACILITIES, INCLUDING THE TENANT. FURTHERMORE, THE LESSOR MAY REVOKE THE TENANT ' S RIGHT TO USE THE KITCHEN AND DINING FACILITIES AT ANY TIME AFTER THIRTY (30) DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE. (9) INSURANCE IF, BECAUSE OF ANYTHING DONE, CAUSED TO BE DONE, PERMITTED OR OMITTED BY THE TENANT, THE PREMIUM RATE FOR ANY KIND OF INSURANCE AFFECTING THE BUILDING SHALL BE RAISED, THE TENANT AGREES THAT THE AMOUNT OF THE INCREASE IN PREMIUM WHICH THE LESSOR SHALL BE THEREBY OBLIGATED TO PAY FOR SUCH INSURANCE SHALL BE PAID BY THE TENANT TO THE LESSOR ON DEMAND, AND THAT IF THE LESSOR SHALL DEMAND THAT THE TENANT 09:20 : 44 1y AUG 19A3 12 ." PAGE 4 REN'EOY THE CONDITION WHICH CAUSED THE LNCREASE Ind THE INSURANCE PREMIUM RATE THE TENANT WILL REMEDY SUCH CU:VDITIO+4 ATITHIN FIvE (5) DAYS AFTER SUCH DEMAND. THt TENANT AGREES THAT THE TENANT SHALL NOT • DII, OR CAUSE TO BE DONE, OR PERMIT . ON THE LEASED PREMISES ANYTHING DEEMED EXTRA HAZARDOUS ON ACCOUNT OF FIRE. LESSOR SHALL CARRY FIRE AND EXTENDED COvERAGE INSuRANCE INSURING ITS INTEREST IN THE +SUILoING AND THE LEASED . PREMISES. TENANT SHALL CARRY FIRE AND EXTENDED COVERAGE INSURANCE INSURING ITS INTEREST, IF ANY, IN IMPROVEMENTS TO OR IN THE LEASED PREMISES AND ITS INTEREST IM ITS OFFICE FURNITURE, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES AND OTHER PERSONAL PROPERTY. BOTH: THE LESSOR AND • • THE TENANT HEREBY WAIVE ANY CLAIMS OR RIGHTS OF ACTION WHICH THE ONE MAY HAVE AGAINST THE OTHER FOR LOSS OR DAMAGE COVERED BY SUCH INSURANCE POLICIES AND BOTH THE LESSOR AND TENANT COVENANT AND AGREE THAT EACH .. OF THEM WILL OBTAIN A WAIVER FROM IFS CARRIER OF SUCH INSURANCE RELEASING SUCH CARRIER ' S SUBROGATION RIGHTS AS AGAINST THE OTHER PARTY. ( 10) INDEMNITY THE TENANT AGREES TO INDEMNIFY ANU SAVE HARMLESS THE LESSOR AND THE AGENTS , SERVANTS AND EMPLOYEES OF THE LESSOR AGAINIST AND FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS BY OR ON BEHALF OF ANY PERSON, FIRM,. OR CORPORATIor ARISING BY REASON OF INJURY TO PERSON OR DAMAGE TO PROPERTY OCCURRING IrN ' THE LEASED • PREMISES OCCASIONED IN wHOLE OR IrN PART BY ANY ACT UN THE PART OF THE TENANT OR AN EMPLOYEE AHILE ACTIrNG WITr3.IN THE SCOPE 'iF EMPLOYMENT, AGENT, VISITOR, ASSIGN OR UrNUERTENANT OF THE TENANT OP 6Y REASON OF ANY UNLAWFUL USE OF THE LEASE:) PREMISES OR ANY BREACH, VIOLATION OR NON—PERFORMANCE OF ANY COVENANT IN THIS LEASE ON THE PART OF THE TENANT TO BE OBSERVED OR PERFORMED, AND ALSO FO.R ANY MATTER OR THING GROWING OUT OF THE OCCUPANCY OR USE OF THE LEASED PREmISES 5Y • THE TENANT OR ANYONE HOLDING OR CLAIMING TU HOLD THROUGH OR UNDER rHE TENANT. TENANT AGREES TO PAY FOR ALL DAMAGES TO THE BUILDING AS ;BELL AS ALL OCCUPANTS THEREOF, CAUSED Hy TENANT ' S M ISUSE OR NEGLECT OF SAID LEASED PREMISES, ITS APPARTUS UR APPURTENANCES. LESSOR SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO TENANT FOR ANY 04rwAGE BY OR FROM ANY ACT OR NEGLIGE.`JCE OF ANY CO—TENANT UR OTHER OCCUPANT OF THt BUILDING OR +3Y ANY OwNtR 1UR OCCUPANT OF ADJOINING CONTINUOUS PROPERTY. ( 11 ) FIRE OH OTHER CASUALTY IN THE EVENT THE BUILDING IN WHICH THE LEASED PREMISES ARE LOCATED IS DESTROYED BY FIRE, UNAVOIDABLE ACCI0Er4T - OR CASUALTY, THIS LEASE SHALL THEREUPON TERMINATE . IN THE EVENT THE BUILDING IN WHICH THE LEASED] PREMISES ARE LOCATED IS DAMAGED BY FIRE, UNAVOIDABLE ACCIDENT OR CASUALTY 10 SUCH AN EXTENT THAT IN LESSOR ' S OPINIuN, THE PORTION OF SAlt BUILDING IN WHICH THE LEASED PREMISES ARE SPECIFICALLY LOCATED CA;4EJOT BE PEP4i.REi) AITHIN NINETY (90) DAYS TO ITS APPRO-YIMATE CONDITION EXISTING IMMEDIATELY PRECEOI 'JG SUCH FIRE, UNAVOIDABLE ACCIDENT UP CASUALTY , THIS LEASE SHALL THEREUPON TERMINATE. 08: 27:57 01 JUN 1983 PAGE 5 1� IN THE EVENT THE PORTION OF THE BUILDING IA IHICH THE LEASED PREMISES 4HE SPECIFICALLY LOCATED DAMAGED SY FIRE, ONAVflIDABLE ACCIDENT , OR CASUALTY AND THE SAME CAN BE REPAIRED :vITHIN NINETY (90) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FIRE, UNAVOIDABLE ACCIDENT OR CASUALTY, ThE PARTIES HERETO AGREE THAT SAID LEASED PREMISES SHALL AE REPAIRED AND RESTORED BY LESSOR TO THE . APPROXIMATE CONDITION OF SAID LEASED PREMISES EXISTING BEFORE SAID • FIRE, UNAVOIDAnLE ACCIDENT OR CASUALTY, AND THIS LEASE SHALL REmAItf: IN FULL FuRCE AND EFFECT; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT • THE RENT DURING ThE PERIOD OF REPAIR SE REDUCED TO AN AMOUNT WHICH, IN LESSOR'S OPINION, BEARS THE SAME RATIO TO THE RENT. PROVIDED FOR HEREIN AS THE PORTION; OF THE LEASED PREMISES THAN AVAILABLE FOR USE BEARS TO THE ENTIRE LEASED PREMISES. UPO1I COMPLETION OF SUCH REPAIRS THE RENT HALL THEREAFTER 3E PAID AS PROVIDED FOR HEREIN AS THE PORTION OF THE LEASED PREMISES THEN AVAILABLE FOR USE BEARS TO THE ENTIRE LEASED PREMISES. UPON CONIPLErIUN- OF SUCH REPAIRS THE RENT SHALL THEREAFTER HE PAID AS PROVIDED IN THE PARAGRAPH ABOVE DESIGNATED RENT. ( 12) DEFAULT IN THE EVENT THE TENANT SHALL FAIL TO PAY ANY RENT -1HEN DUE IN ACCORDANCE ,IITH THE TERMS OF THIS LEASE Os< DO OR FAIL TO DO ANY O TIER THING, CONDITION, COVENANT OR REOUIREMENT OF THIS LEASE, AND SUCH DEFAULT SHALL CONTINUE FUR A PERIOD OF THIRTY (301 DAYS AFTER IfTEN +VOTICE • DtLIVERED TO TENANT AT THE LEASED PREMISES OF SUCH DEFAULT, THE LESSOR, AITH0U1 PREJUDICE TO ANY OTHER RIGHTS OH REMEDIES THAT IT MAY HAVE, SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT, IMMEDIATELY UR AT ANY TIME THEREAFTER, TO RE-ENTER THE LEASED PREMISES AND REMOVE ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY F RUP THE LEASED PREMISES. IN THE EVENT THE TENANT SHALL NEGLECT TO KEEP OR PERFORM ANY OTHER COVENANT, AGREEMENT OR CONDITION OF THIS LEASE 1)'r SHALL FAIL TO CONFORM TO ANY OF THE dUILDING RULES AND REGULATIOi5 `!U:•! IN FORCE OR HEREAFTER ADOPTED bY THE LESSOR, THE LESSOR SHALL GIvE WRITTEN NOTICE OF SUCH DEFAULT TO THE TENANT; AND IN THE EVtI"T THAT SUCH DEFAULT IS NOT RECTIFIED 41THIN FEN ( 10 ) DAYS FRi)M THE DATE OF • SUCH NOTICE, THEN THE LESSOR SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO ENTER THE LEASED PREMISES IMMEDIATELY OR AT ANY TIME THEREAFTER AND REMOVE THE TENA0T THEREFROM, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO ANY OTHER REMEDIES OF THE LESSOR . IN THE EVENT OF ANY SUCH RE-ENTRY, fHE TENANT HEREBY WAIVES ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES NH1CH MAY bE CAUSED BY THE RE-ENTRY OF THE LESSOR ANU °ILL SAVE THE LESSOR HARMLESS FROM ANY LOSS, COST OR DAMAGES 'OCCASIDNtD Y • LESSOR THEREBY AND NO SUCH NE-ENTRY SHALL bE CONSIDERED OR CONSTRUED TO BE FORCIBLE ENTRY. SHOULD THE LESSOR ELEC r TO RE-ENTER THE LEASED PREMISES AS HEREIN PROVIDED, OR SHOULD IT TAKE POSSESSION PURSUANT TO LEGAL PROCEEDINGS, IT MAY EITHER TERMINATE THIS LEASE OR IT MAY, FROM TIME TO TImE, AITHUUT TERMINATING THIS LEASE, RE—LET THE PREMISES OR ANY PART THEREOF ON TENANT ' S ACCOUNT FOR SUCH TIME OR TINES AND AT Si)LH RENTAL f1R RENTALS AND UPON SUCH OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS THE LESSOR IN ITS SOLE DISCRETION MAY DEEM ADVIS4' LE, NI TH THE RIGHT TO MAKE ALTERATIONS AND :REPAIRS TO ThE LEASED PREMISES, AND THE TENANT SHALL PAY THE AMOUNT OF RENT DUE UNDER THIS LEASE To THE DATE OF ThE bEGIN:NING OF PAYMENT OF RENT PuRStJANT TO ANY SUCH RE-LETTING, TOi FATE)? wI TH THE COST OF SUCH RE-LETTING INCLUDING THE COST OF ANY ALTEPATIOiJS AND NEP.4IRS TO THE LEASED PREMISES, AND 1EIANT -vILL THEREAFTER .AY J8 : 2b: 00 01 JUN 198 - PAIGE b 13C . MONTHLY INSTALLMENTS DURING; THE REVIAINDER OF THE TER."i OF THIS LEASE THE DIFFERENCE, IF ANY, BETWEEN THE PENT COLLECTED FRUm• SUCH RE-LETTING AND THE RENT RESERVED IN THIS LEASE, IF SUCK RENT COLLECTED IS LESS THAN THAT RESERVED IN THIS LEASE. NO SUCH RE-ENTRY OR TAKING POSSESSION OF THE LEASED PREMISES HY THE LESSOR SHALL BE CONSTRoE,; AS AN wLECTIUN ON ITS PART TO TERMINATE THIS LEASE UNLESS A AR MIEN NOTICE OF SUCH INTENTION BE GIVEN TO THE TENANT. NOTwITHSTANOING ANY . SUCH RE-LETTING aITHOUT TERMINATION, THE LESSOR MAY AT ANY TIME. AFTER THE OCCURRENCE OF ANY DEFAULT SET OUT IN THIS PARAGRAPH, NUMBER 1?, ELECT TO TERMINATE THIS LEASE ANO MAY TERMINATE 3T HY GIVING :ykIfTEm NOTICE TO THAT EFFECT TO THE TENANT. IF THE LESSOR SHALL AT ANY TIME TERMINATE_ THIS LEASE ON ACCOUNT OF ANY DEFAULT SET OUT IN THIS PARAGRAPH, IN ADDITION TO OTHER REMEDIES IT v1AY HAVE, IT MAY RECOVER FROM THE TENANT ALL DAMAGES THAT . IT MAY SUFFER BY REASON OF THE TERMINATION OF THE LEASE, INCLUDING, Bur NOT LIMITED TO, THE CJST OF RECOVERING POSSESSION OF THE LEASE{) PREMISES, AND THE EXCESS , IF ANY, OF THE AMOUNT OF RENT AND OTHER AMOUNTS TO BE PAID BY THE TENANT UNDER LIE TERMS OF THE LEASE FUR THE REMAINDER OF THE STATED TERM, OVER THE THEN REASONABLE RENTAL VALUE (IF THE PREMISES FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE STATED TERM. ( 13) ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING TENANT SHALL NOT SELL, ASSIGN, ' PLED ,E OR HYPOTHESCATE THIS LEASE, OR SUBLET THF LEASED PREMISES OR ANY PART THEREOF WITHOUT THE Prtiw NRITTEN CONSENT OF LESSOR. CONSENT BY LESSOR TO ONE ASSIGNMENT JR • • SUBLETTING SHALL NOT DESTROY OR OPERATE AS A WAIVER OF THE PROHIBITIONS CONTAINED IN THIS PARAGRAPH AS TO FUTURE ASSIGttENVTS UR LEASES AND ALL SUCH LATER ASSIGNmENTS OR LEASES SHALL BE MADE ONLY ' NUN LESSOR ' S PRIOR #RITTEN CONSENT. IN THE EVENT ANY ASSIGNMENT OF THE LEASE OR LETTING OF THE LEASE PREMISES IS CONSENTED TU BY THE_ LESSOR, TENANT SHALL REMAIN LIABLE TO LESSOR FOR PAYMENT OF ALL :LENT HEREIN PROVIDED FOR AND FOR THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE OF ALL THE CONVENANTS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS LEASE BY ANY ASSIGNEE OR SUBLESSEES TO THE SAME EYTENT AS IF THE LEASE HAD NUT BEEN ASSIGNED OR T`tE LEASED PREMISES LET. IF THIS LEASE SHALL BE ASSIGNED OR THE PREMISES SUbLET BY TENANT AT A RENTAL THAI EXCEEDS ALL RENTAL TO RE PAID .TO LESSOR HEREUNDER, THEN AND IN SUCH EVENT ANY SUCH EXCESS SHALL HE PAID OVER TO LESSOR BY TENANT . ( 14) BUILDING RULES AND REGULATIONS THE TENANT HAS READ THE RULES AND REGULATIONS HERETO ATTACKED Ai4O MADE A PART HEREOF AND HEREBY AGREES TO ABIDE BY AND CONFORM TO THE SAmE. AND TO SUCH FURTHER RULES AND REGULATIONS AS THE LESSOR mAY FROM TImE TO TIME MAKE OR ADOPT FUR THE CARE, PROTECTION AND BENEFIT OF T►IE bIJILDING OR THE GENERAL COMFORT AND AELFARt OF ITS OCCUPANTS. TrF TENANT FURTHER AGREES THAT THE LESSOR SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO :LAIVE ANY UR ALL OF SUCH RULES IN THE CASE OF ANY ONE OR MORE TENANTS IN THE SUILOING HITHOUT AFFECTING THE TENANT ' S OBLIGATIONS • UNDER THIS LEASE AND SAID RULES AND REGULATIONS AND THAT THE LESSOR .. SHALL iNO 1 HE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE NON-CONFORMANCE BY ANY OTHER TENANT TO ANY OF SAID • Rt1LES OR REGULATIONS. 08 :2H: UA 01 JuN 1983 PAGE 7 131 ( 15) LESSOR ' S REPRESENTATIVE THE LESSOR ' S REPRESENTATIVE FOR ALL MATTERS CONCERNING THIS LEASE AND/UR THE USE OF THE PREMISES SHALL BE THE ORANGE COUNTY DIRECTOR OF KECREATIUN AND PARKS OR HIS/HER DESIGNEE . ( 16) QUIET ENJOYMENT THE LESSOR AGREES THAT THE TENANT UN PAYING THE STIPULATED RENTAL AND KEEPING AND PERFORMING THE AGREEMENT AND CONVENANTS HEREIN CONTAINED, SHALL HOLD AND ENJOY THE LEASED PREMISES. FOR THE • TERM • AFORESAID, SUBJECT, HOWEVER, TO THE TERMS OF THIS LEASE. ( 17) WAIVER THE WAIVER BY LESSOR OF ANY BREACH OF ANY COVENANT OR AGREEMENT HEREIN CONTAINED SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO SE A WAIVER OF SUCH COVENANT UR AGREEMENT OR ANY SUBSEQUENT BREACH OF THE SAME Ok ANY OTHER COVENANT OR AGREEMENT HEREIN CONTAINED. THE SUBSEQUENT ACCEPTANCE OF RENT HEREUNDER t3Y LESSOR SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO bE A 'WAIVER OF ANY . PRECEDING BREACH BY TENANT OF ANY COVENANT OR AGREEMENT OF THIS LEASE OTHER THAN THE FAILURE OF THE TENANT TO PAY TO THE PARTICULAR RENTAL . SO ACCEPTED, REGARDLESS OF LESSOR ' S KNOWLEDGE OF SUCH PRECEDING BREACH AT THE TIME OF ACCEPTANCE OF SUCH RENT. • ( 18) INTEGRATION CLAUSE ANY STIPULATIONS, REPRESENTATIONS, PROMISES OR AGREEMENTS, ORAL OR WRITTEN , MADE PRIOR TO OR CONTEMPORANEOUSLY !KITH THIS' AGREEMENT SHALL HAVE NO LEGAL OR EQUITABLE CONSEQUENCES, AND THE ONLY AGREEMENT MADE AND BINDING ON THE PARTIES IS CONTAINED HEREIN AND IT IS THE COMPLETE AND TOTAL INTEGRATION OF THE INTENT AND UNDERSTANDING OF LESSOR AND TENANT . IN WITNESS 'HEREOF , THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE DULY EXECUTED THIS LEASE AGREEMENT AS OF THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. LESSOR: 'RANGE COUNTY AV BY : RICHARD E. WlHI TTED, CHAIRMAN ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: TENANT: JOINT ORANGE. CrIATHAM CUHMUNITY ACTION BY : . ... . - - - � . � ' 08 :2o: 06 01 JUN 1983 i PAGE 8 1c34 RULES- AND REGULATIONS ( 1 ) THE SIDE WALKS, ENTRANCES, rtALLAAYS, ELEVATORS, AND STAIR;AAYS SHALL NOT dE , OBSTRUCTED BY ANY TENANT OR USED By HIM FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN FOR INGRESS OR EGRESS. (2) IF THE BUILDING WHERE THE LEASED PREMISES IS LOCATED HAS. IN- IT CONFERENCE ROOMS, AUDITORIUMS, GYMNASIUMS, GYMATURIU:•,S, mEETIhiG• ROOMS, ETC. , THEIR USE MAY riE SCHEDULED THROUGH Tr1E LESSOR OR HIS AGENT. THE TENANT CAN ONLY SCHEDULE THE USE OF THESE ROOMS Fl_R HIMSELF, OR HIS AGENCY, ONLY. OTHER INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS MIDST CONTACT THE LESSOR OR HIS AGENT DIRECTLY TO SCHEDULE •TrIF USE OF THESE ROOMS. (3) THE LESSOR MAY CHARGE FEES FOR THE USE OF CONFERENCE ROOMS, AND AUDITORIUMS, GYMNASIUMS, GYMATORIUMS, mEETING ROOMS, ETC. , TO OFFSET THE EXPENSE OF PROVIDING THESE ROOMS. (4) NO ADDITIONAL LOCKS SHALL BE PLACED UPON ANY DOORS .vITHOLT WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE LESSOR, NOR SHALL ANY DUPLICATE KEYS t)E MADE OP OBTAINED OTHER THAN SY OR THROUGH LESSOR. (5) TENANT SHALL NOT MAKE IMPROPER NOISES DISTURBANCES OF ANY KIND, SING, PLAY OR OPERATE MUSICAL IiNSTRUMENTS, RADIO, OR TELEVISII SETS, OR ANY MACHINES OR DEVICES IN SUCH FASHION, AS MAY SE DEEMEI) 6Y LESSOR TU INTERFERE WITH OTHER OCCUPANTS OF THE t3UILUING. • (S) THE INSTALLATION OF NINOU:ti SHADES, VENITION HLINDS, DRAPERIES AND CURTAINS MAY BE INSTALLED SUBJECT TO LESSOR ' S APPROVAL uF METHOD OF INSTALLATION•t INCLUDING HANGING HARDWARE AND OF COLOR AND TEXTURE OF ANY SUCH NINO0A COVERINGS. (7) TENANT OR THEIR EMPLOYER; SHALL NOT : A . KELP ANIMALS OR BIRDS UN THE PREMISES. 8. ALLOw 8ICYCI_ES OR SIMILAR VEHICLES IN THE i3UILDING. C . THRQN ANYTHING THROUGH WINDOWS OR DON STA•IR:'JAYS. D. LEAVE PREMISES UNOCCUPIED HITHOUT LOCKING ALL DOORS, EXTIN GUISH I NG LIGHTS AND TURNING f- F WATER OUTLETS. • E. INSTALL OR OPERATE VENDING MACHINES OF ANY KIND WITHOUT CONSENT OF LESSOR. F. USE PREMISES FOR LODGING ROOMS, GAMBLING OR ANY IMMORAL PURPOSE. G. OPEN wINOOwS WHILE AIR-CONDITIONING SYSTEM IS OPERATING . • H. KEEP KEROSENE, Bu i'lIriG FLUID AND OTHER HIGHLY INFLAMrtAbLE • MATERIAL ON THE PREMISES 01THOUT LESSOR ' S CONSENT. • I . MAKE ADJUSTMENTS TO HEATING AND AIR-CONDITIONINNG CONTROLS, PLL)m.eING 48:26: 08 01 JUN 1983 PANE 9 t�c: APPARATUS, ELECTNICL FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT, 0INran►v3 AND DOORS, (NOTIFY LESSOR IF ADJUSTMENTS ARE REQUIRED OR ;)ESIRED) • J . INSTALL ANY A`JCHORAGE, SUPPORTING OR BRACING DEVICES INTO FLOOR, HALL PARTITIONS OR CEILINGS. (NOTIFY LESSOR IF ANY SUCH DEVISES ARE OESIREt ) . K. BLOCK OR OBSTRUCT ANY ENTRANCES OR EXITS, INCLUDING FIRE EXITS. (b) THE POSSESSION, SELLING OR CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES OR ILLEGAL DRUGS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED 'ON THE LEASED PROPERTY, THE BUILDING OR THE GROUNDS. (9) THE LESSOR SHALL NOT RE LIABLE FOR ANY OA: AGES DUE TO STOPPAGES OR MALFUNCTIONS OF ANY SORT OF THE ELEVATORS, HEAT AND AIR-•CONDITIONING SYSTEMS, PLUMBING FIXTURES AND THE ELECTRICAL POWER AND LIGHTING SYSTEM. ( 10) THE LESSOR RESERvES THE RIGHT TO MAKE SUCH OTHER AND FURTHER REASONABLE RULES AND REGULATIONS AS IN ITS JUDGEMENT IT 4AY FROM 1ImE TO TImE DEEM NECESSARY FOR THE SAFETY, CARE MNr3 CLEANLINESS OF THE PREMISES, AND FOR THE PRESERVATION OF GOOD ORDER THEREIN.. ( 11 ) THE LESSOR RESERVES THE RIGHT TO DESIGNATE THE TIME AHEN AND METHOD BY WHICH FREIGHT, FURNITURE, SAFES, GOODS, MERCHANDISE AAD OTHER ARTICLES MAY BE BROUGHT INTO OR TAKEN FROM THE BUILDING AND THE LEASED PREMISES. REPAIRS, PAINTING, MATERIAL MOVING AiyD, OTHER SIMILAR WORK THAI MAY bE DONE TO THE LEASED PREMISES BY OR FOR TENANT . SHALL nE PERFORMED BY ANY WORKMEN EMPLOYED, DESIGNATED OR APPROVED BY TriF LESSOR. ( 12) THE LESSOR RESERVES THE RIGHT AT ALL TREES TU EXCLuDE bOUTbLACKS, NE:VSBOYS, (LOITERERS) VENDORS, SOLICITORS AND PEDDLERS FROM THE BUILDING, AND TO RECUIRE REGISTRATIONS, SATISF4CTi)RY IDENTIFICATION AND CREDENTIALS FROM ALL PERSONS SEEKING ACCESS TO ANY PART OF THE BUILDING, AT TIMES OTHER THAN DURING ORDDNARY BUSjNESS HOURS. THE LESSOR WILL EXCEKCISE ITS BEST JUDGEMENT IN THE EXE_CUTION OF SUCH CONTROL BUT SHALL NOT BE HELD LIABLE FOR THE GRANTING OR REFUSAL OF SUCH ACCESS. ( 13) THE LESSOR RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REGULATE AND CONTROL ALL PARKING LOTS AND DRIVEWAYS INCLUUIiNG ASSIGNMENT OF PARKING AREAS, AND INSTITUTING TRAFFIC PATTERNS. 1 1 i i fin• 1 I1 1 1 1 T 1 i i 1 0 0 7 r' 78 � . ill( 1�l:ls iNSURANCH AGENCY, INC. 4:10'�PRAIrl ) In.+ rev*#} 6�n — i --. _�_ _ H 11111Snejnl!51AFFr - 01,51 nrit(-r: urrx Ju+� aril err-1511(HII},rTt,�R111(11RC11r11Airlrt jr1F1Y11�+11' rfiDlSllllnf ! e'er r.•n!•:•• _ f/!y rrr..%1'} 5 Of `• 7 s r r.t 0 r rrs rl•f(� (}ySl 9 rr tJrr�rr�clrt �i'✓ co v 2 n i IN&otr b +51A[1( �! ; I:.:r..ran 1•:nr� I►-pl. 13 u rnn ,l� ° +�rrinr GI-rrr,^;, 64 V dc.ft k 1 I e n �. [, •rs f x'1.3 0`10� �t _ ai7 Vl — -� /1� -X 1103T f 3a or, trig tl i)7,zvtr 'Ito to r�'c i �jQ-tfF 1Jr0 it r.nS •rA ! �x"t ieir7 • . l Rf' f 'r5. L list- I1f 1!nralhtR Irk% —r- ram [r vl.nn.[, r�,S:fr,,,1 rlw•.•,ran•( aI III i::. irrFa !f rYr, aE e•rr. I .n,rl r R9rf90 }Lg0PD AI/A _11fJ8 X-C lr-pt L � f�lglTaa^� (fa li, Ir}1'i11 • r ull ` -- — _ I .n X11 • r ID(� ,•� l�hn r) :tfr+ t_ r A 4 a erwaa view-.R srrfa rs .$1 1 . 7T ;• . •y t � / i l 18fY'fay i �.rr}.ysl) i {!.m .3 h;I.• ' i it •� f�/� /����– �• �f�lrlk_ �t hf�'�I1� - — �I•rt-�f;x–--� t rl,�r 3'. I, I, \,f•r n'1 �{�;� fG!rti11l1an 3774 !Iq f7• !. !htl• �.1 T 1c7 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION mat ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NO. MEETING DATE JUNE 17, 1986 SUBJECT: LEASE RENEWAL WITH THE COMMUNITY SCHOOL FOR PEOPLE UNDER SIX *********************************************************************** DEPARTMENT: PURCHASING & CENTRAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEARING YES X NO ************************************************************************** ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: PAM JONES EXT 497 Lease Renewal Original 1983 Lease PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH 732-8181 HILLSBOROUGH 732-9361 CHAPEL HILL 967-9251 MEBANE 227-2031 DURHAM 688-7331 ************************************************************************** PURPOSE: To approve lease renewal between the Community School for People Under Six and the County of Orange for space at the Northside Multipurpose Center, Chapel Hill , North Carolina. NEED: An agreement was entered into in November, 1985 between the County and the Community School for People under Six for space to be used as a Day Care Center of the Northside Multipurpose Center, Chapel Hill, N.C. The tenant is desirous that this agreement be continued for an additional one year period commencing on July 1, 1986 and terminating at 12:00 midnight on June 30, 1987. Terms of the Renewed lease will be the same with the following exception: The Lessor's monthly utility charge will be three hundred- twenty-five dollars ($325) for actual utility cost. The 85-86 lease called for a utility cost of four hundred dollars ($400) per month to be paid with seventy-five dollars ($75) of this to be applied toward repayment of overdue bills. This obligation has been met. IMPACT: The County will receive three thousand nine hundred dollars ($3900) in revenue as a result of this lease. RECOMMENDATION: Approve lease renewal July 1, 1986 through June 30 , 1987 between the County of Orange and the Community School for People Under Six for space to be used as a day care center at Northside Multipurpose Center, Chapel Hill, N.C. i 3 LEASE AGREEMENT RENEWAL NORTH CAROLINA ORANGE COUNTY WHEREAS , a lease agreement was made and entered into as of the 15th day of November, 1983, by and between Orange County, LESaO13 and The Community School for People Under Six, TENANT , for space to be used as a Day Care Center at the Northside Multipurpose Center, Chapel Hill, N.C. WHEREAS , the LESSOR , and the TENANT wish to renew the lease agreement as amended. NOW, THEREFORE, LESSOR and TENANT mutually agree to the following: (1) The lease agreement will be continued for a period of one year commencing on July 1, 1986 and ending at 12:00 midnight on the day of June 30, 1987. (2) The Lessor's monthly utility charge shall be $325.00 per month. (3) All other terms and conditions will remain the same. This agreed to, the _day of 1986. LESSOR: Orange County BY: Don Willhoit Chairman, Orange County Board of Commissioners ATTEST: TENANT: The Community School for People Under Six PAGE 1 LEASE AGREEMENT 13`r NORTH ,CAROLINA ORANGE COUNTY r THE LEASE AGREEMENT MADE THIS :.? _DAY OF "�•� �:'="'r"~;'' , 19. 4 BETWEEN ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WHOSE PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS 106 EAST MARGARET LANE, HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA, HEREINAFTER CALLED THE LESSOR AND THE COMMUNITY SCHOOL FOR PEOPLE UNDER SIX WHOSE PRINCIPAL OF PLACE OF BUSINESS IS: 410 CALDWELL STREET EXT, P. 0. BOX 633, CHAPEL HILL, NORTH CAROLINA HEREINAFTER CALLED THE TENANT. WITNESSETH IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL BENEFITS TO THE LESSOR AND TO THE TENANT, AND OF THE CONVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS UPON THE PART OF THE LESSOR AND THE TENANT TO BE KEPT AND PERFORMED, THE LESSOR HEREBY DEMISES AND LEASES TO THE TENANT, AND THE TENANT LEASES AND TAKES FROM THE LESSOR THE PREMISES SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLAN ATTACHED HERE TO AS EXHIBIT A AND BY REFERENCE MADE A PART HERE OF (HEREIN CALLED THE LEASED PREMISES) LOCATED AT: NORTHSIDE MULTIPURPOSE CENTER, CHAPEL HILL, NORTH CAROLINA MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A,. ATTACHED HERE TO BE OCCUPIED AND USED AS A DAY CARE CENTER AND FOR THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS HEREIN SET FORTH. (1) TERM OF LEASE: THE TERM HEREOF SHALL COMMENCE ON THE FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER, 1983 AND SHALL END AT 12: 00 MIDNIGHT ON THE 30TH OF SEPTEMBER, 1984. (2) RENTAL: TENANT SHALL PAY TO THE LESSOR THE SUM OF FIFTEEN THOUSAND, EIGHT HUNDRED TWENTY SEVEN ($15, 827 . 00) PER ANNUM, PAYABLE IN MONTHLY INSTALLMENTS OF ONE THOUSAND, THREE HUNDRED NINETEEN DOLLARS ($1,319.00) EACH DUE ON THE FIRST DAY OF EACH MONTH, INADVANCE DURING THE TERM OF THIS LEASE. THIS RENT SHALL BE SUSPENDED IN FAVOR OF INKIND CONTRIBUTION FROM THE LESSOR TO THE TENANT. (3) UTILITIES: THE TENANT SHALL PAY FOR ELECTRICITY AND FUEL FOR HEAT BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FORMULA: TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE USED BY TENANT (2,435 SQ. FT. ) DIVIDED BY TOTAL USABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE BUILDING WHERE THE LEASED PROPERTY IS LOCATED; (10, 852 SQ. FT.) , TIMES THE AMOUNT AS THE ELECTRICITY AND FUEL FOR HEAT BILLS RECEIVED BY THE LESSOR DURING THE TERM OF THIS LEASE FOR THE BUILDING WHERE THE LEASED PROPERTY IS LOCATED. THE LESSOR SHALL SEND THE TENANT ON A TIMELY BASIS A STATEMENT ITEMIZING SUCH UTILITY CHARGES. PAYMENT SHALL BE DUE TO THE LESSOR WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE ON SUCH STATEMENTS . THE LESSOR SHALL PAY FOR ALL WATER AND SEWER CHARGES. (4) CARE AND REPAIR OF PREMISES : 10: 21:13 10 OCT 1983 i PAGE 2 THE TENANT SHALL COMMIT NO ACTIVE WASTE AND SHALL TAKE GOOD CARE OF THE PREMISES AND THE FIXTURES AND APPURTENANCES THEREIN, AND SHALL, IN USE AND OCCUPANCY OF THE PREMISES, CONFORM TO ALL LAWS, ORDERS AND REGULATIONS OF THE FEDERAL, STATE AND MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT, AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF INSURERS, APPLICABLE TO THE PREMISES. THE TENANT WILL PROVIDE JANITORIAL AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, TRASH REMOVAL, WINDOW CLEANING, FLOOR AND WALL CLEANING, FLOOR WAXING, LIGHT BULB REPLACEMENT, PAINTING, SNOW AND ICE REMOVAL, CUTTING OF GRASS, AND TRIMMING OF SHRUBS AND TREES, AND ALL OTHER ACTIVITIES NECESSARY TO KEEP THE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR OF THE LEASED PREMISES IN CLEAN AND PRESENTABLE STATE. THE LESSOR SHALL MAINTAIN AND OPERATE THE HEATING, AIR--CONDITIONING, ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING SYSTEMS AS WELL AS PERFORM THOSE REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE DUTIES AS THE LESSOR DEEMS NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE, (5) INTERRUPTION OF SERVICE: THE LESSOR SHALL NOT BE OR BECOME LIABLE FOR DAMAGES TO TENANT ALLEGED TO BECAUSE OR OCCASSIONED BY OF IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH OR THE RESULT OF ANY INTERRUPTION, DEFECT OR BREAKDOWN FROM ANY CAUSE WHATEVER IN ANY OF THE SERVICES HEREIN REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPHS 3 AND 4 ABOVE. HOWEVER UPON RECEIPT OF ACTUAL NOTICE OF ANY SUCH INTERRUPTION, DEFECT, OR BREAKDOWN, LESSOR WILL TAKE SUCH STEPS AS ARE REASONABLE TO RESTORE ANY SUCH INTERRUPTED SERVICE OR TO REMEDY ANY SUCH DEFECT. (6) ALTERATIONS: ANY ALTERATION, ADDITIONS, IMPROVEMENTS OR PARTITIONS , EXCEPTING THOSE PARTITIONS TO BE FURNISHED BY LESSOR, PERMITTED HEREIN SHALL BE MADE AT THE EXPENSE OF THE TENANT. THE TENANT AGREES THAT TENANT WILL MAKE NO ALTERATIONS, ADDITIONS OR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE LEASED PREMISES WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE LESSOR AND THAT ALL ALTERATIONS, ADDITIONS OR IMPROVEMENTS MADE BY AND FOR THE TENANT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY AND ALL SUBDIVIDING PARTITIONS, WALLS, SPECIAL PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL FIXTURES OR RAILINGS OR WHATEVER TYPE, MATERIAL OR HEIGHT, BUT EXCEPTING MOVABLE OFFICE FURNITURE PUT IN AT THE EXPENSE OF THE TENANT, SHALL, WHEN MADE, BE THE PROPERTY OF THE LESSOR AND SHALL REMAIN UPON AND BE SURRENDERED WITH THE LEASED PREMISES AS A PART THEREOF AT . THE EXPIRATION OR EARLIER TERMINATION OF THIS LEASE. THE LESSOR, HOWEVER, RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE THE TENANT TO REMOVE ANY PANELING, DECORATIONS, PARTITIONS , WALLS , RAILINGS , FLOOR COVERINGS, BOOTHS, PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL FIXTURES OR OFFICE FURNITURE INSTALLED BY OR AT THE REQUEST OF THE TENANT, BY GIVING NOTICE OF SUCH ELECTION TO THE TENANT AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO, OR NOT LATER THAN TEN DAYS AFTER, THE EXPIRATION OR EARLIER TERMINATION OF THIS LEASE OR A DATE FIVE DAYS AFTER THE GIVING OF SUCH NOTICE, WHICHEVER SHALL BE THE LATER. (7) RIGHT OF ENTRY: THE TENANT AGREES THAT THE LESSOR SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO ENTER 10:21: 19 10 OCT 1983 1Pt�A�CE 3 AND TO GRANT LICENSES TO ENTER THE LEASED PREMISES AT ANY REASONABLE. TIME AFTER HAVING GIVING THE TENANT NOTICES OF ITS INTENT TO SO ENTER (A) TO EXAMINE THE LEASED PREMISES, (B) TO MAKE ALTERATIONS AND REPAIRS TO' THE LEASED PREMISES OR TO THE BUILDING (INCLUDING THE RIGHT, DURING THE PROGRESS OF SUCH ALTERATIONS OR REPAIRS, TO KEEP AND STORE WITHIN THE LEASED PREMISES ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS, TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT) , (C) FOR ANY PURPOSE WHICH THE LESSOR MAY DEEM NECESSARY FOR THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE BUILDING, OR (D) TO EXHIBIT THE LEASED PREMISES TO APPLICANTS. NO SUCH ENTRY SHALL IN ANY MANNER AFFECT THE OBLIGATIONS AND CONVENANTS OF THIS LEASE. (8) USE AND OCCUPANCY: TENANT AGREES THAT THE LEASED PREMISES WILL BE USED ONLY FOR THE PURPOSE HEREINBEFORE SET OUT IN THIS LEASE, THAT NO UNLAWFUL USE OF THE LEASED PREMISES WILL BE MADE, THAT NO SIGN, NAME, LEGEND, NOTICE OR ADVERTISEMENT OF ANY KIND WILL BE FIXED, PAINTED OR DISPLAYED ON ANY PART OF THE BUILDING, EXCEPT THAT THE NAME AND BUSINESS OR PROFESSION OF THE TENANT MAY BE PAINTED WITH APPROPRIATE LETTERING APPROVED BY THE LESSOR ON THE DOOR OR DOORS TO THE SPACE LEASED BY THE TENANT OR AS OTHERWISE AGREED TO BY THE LESSOR; AND UPON THE TERMINATION OF THIS LEASE, TENANT WILL VACATE AND SURRENDER POSSESSION OF THE LEASED PREMISES TO THE LESSOR IN AS GOOD CONDITION AS THE LEASED PREMISES WERE AT THE COMMENCEMENT OF THIS LEASE, ORDINARY WEAR AND TEAR EXPECTED. THE LESSOR RESERVES THE RIGHT TO USE THE LEASED PREMISES FOR ANY REASONABLE PURPOSE, AS LONG AS THE USE OF SUCH PREMISES DOSE NOT UNDULY AFFECT THE OPERATION OF THE TENANT. THE LESSOR SHALL BE THE FINAL ARBITOR OF WHETHER THE PROPOSED USE BY THE LESSOR UNDULY AFFECTS THE OPERATION OF THE TENANT. (9) INSURANCE IF, BECAUSE OF ANYTHING DONE, CAUSED TO BE DONE, PERMITTED OR OMITTED BY THE TENANT, THE PREMIUM RATE FOR ANY KIND OF INSURANCE AFFECTING THE BUILDING SHALL BE RAISED, THE TENANT AGREES THAT THE AMOUNT OF THE INCREASE IN PREMIUM WHICH THE LESSOR SHALL BE THEREBY OBLIGATED TO PAY FOR SUCH INSURANCE SHALL BE PAID BY THE TENANT TO THE LESSOR ON DEMAND, AND THAT IF THE LESSOR SHALL DEMAND THAT THE TENANT REMEDY THE CONDITION WHICH CAUSED THE INCREASE IN THE INSURANCE PREMIUM RATE THE TENANT WILL REMEDY SUCH CONDITION WITHIN FIVE (5) DAYS AFTER SUCH DEMAND. THE TENANT AGREES THAT THE TENANT SHALL NOT DO, OR CAUSE TO BE DONE, OR PERMIT ON THE LEASED PREMISES ANYTHING DEEMED EXTRA HAZARDOUS ON ACCOUNT OF FIRE. LESSOR SHALL CARRY FIRE AND EXTENDED COVERAGE INSURANCE INSURING ITS INTEREST IN THE BUILDING AND THE LEASED PREMISES . TENANT SHALL CARRY FIRE AND EXTENDED COVERAGE INSURANCE INSURING ITS INTEREST, IF ANY, IN IMPROVEMENTS TO OR IN THE LEASED PREMISES AND ITS INTEREST IN ITS OFFICE FURNITURE, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES AND OTHER PERSONAL PROPERTY. BOTH THE LESSOR AND THE TENANT HEREBY WAIVE ANY CLAIMS OR RIGHTS OF ACTION WHICH THE ONE MAY HAVE AGAINST THE OTHER FOR LOSS OR DAMAGE COVERED BY SUCH 10: 21: 25 10 OCT 1983 ur w. 141 PAGE 4 INSURANCE POLICIES AND BOTH THE LESSOR AND TENANT COVENANT AND AGREE THAT EACH OF THEM WILL OBTAIN A WAIVER FROM ITS CARRIER OF SUCH INSURANCE RELEASING SUCH CARRIER'S SUBROGATION RIGHTS AS AGAINST THE OTHER PARTY. (10) INDEMNITY THE TENANT AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND SAVE HARMLESS THE LESSOR AND THE AGENTS. , SERVANTS AND EMPLOYEES OF THE LESSOR AGAINIST AND FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS BY OR ON BEHALF OF ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION ARISING BY REASON OF INJURY TO PERSON OR DAMAGE TO PROPERTY OCCURRING IN THE LEASED PREMISES OCCASIONED IN WHOLE OR IN PART BY ANY ACT ON THE PART OF THE TENANT OR AN EMPLOYEE WHILE ACTING WITHIN THE SCOPE OF EMPLOYMENT, AGENT, VISITOR, ASSIGN OR UNDERTENANT OF THE TENANT OR BY REASON OF ANY UNLAWFUL USE OF THE LEASED PREMISES OR ANY BREACH, VIOLATION OR NON-PERFORMANCE OF ANY COVENANT IN THIS LEASE ON THE PART OF THE TENANT TO BE OBSERVED OR PERFORMED, AND ALSO FOR ANY MATTER OR THING GROWING OUT OF THE OCCUPANCY OR USE OF THE LEASED PREMISES BY THE TENANT OR ANYONE HOLDING OR CLAIMING TO HOLD THROUGH OR UNDER THE TENANT. TENANT AGREES TO PAY FOR ALL DAMAGES TO THE BUILDING AS WELL AS ALL OCCUPANTS THEREOF, CAUSED BY TENANT'S MISUSE OR NEGLECT OF SAID LEASED PREMISES, ITS APPARTUS OR APPURTENANCES. LESSOR SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO TENANT FOR ANY DAMAGE BY OR FROM ANY ACT OR NEGLIGENCE OF ANY CO-TENANT OR OTHER OCCUPANT OF THE BUILDING OR BY ANY OWNER OR OCCUPANT OF ADJOINING CONTINUOUS PROPERTY. (11) FIRE OR OTHER CASUALTY IN THE EVENT THE BUILDING IN WHICH THE LEASED PREMISES ARE LOCATED IS DESTROYED BY FIRE, UNAVOIDABLE ACCIDENT OR CASUALTY., THIS LEASE SHALL THEREUPON TERMINATE. IN THE EVENT THE BUILDING IN WHICH THE LEASED PREMISES ARE LOCATED IS DAMAGED BY FIRE, UNAVOIDABLE ACCIDENT OR CASUALTY TO SUCH AN EXTENT THAT IN LESSOR'S OPINION, THE PORTION OF SAID BUILDING IN WHICH THE LEASED PREMISES ARE SPECIFICALLY LOCATED CANNOT BE REPAIRED WITHIN NINETY (90) DAYS TO ITS APPROXIMATE CONDITION EXISTING IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING SUCH FIRE, UNAVOIDABLE ACCIDENT OR CASUALTY, THIS LEASE SHALL THEREUPON TERMINATE. IN THE EVENT THE PORTION OF THE BUILDING IN WHICH THE LEASED PREMISES ARE SPECIFICALLY LOCATED DAMAGED BY FIRE, UNAVOIDABLE ACCIDENT, OR CASUALTY AND THE SAME CAN BE REPAIRED WITHIN NINETY (90) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FIRE, UNAVOIDABLE ACCIDENT OR CASUALTY, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE THAT SAID LEASED PREMISES SHALL BE REPAIRED AND RESTORED BY LESSOR TO THE APPROXIMATE CONDITION OF SAID LEASED PREMISES EXISTING BEFORE SAID FIRE, UNAVOIDABLE ACCIDENT OR CASUALTY, AND THIS LEASE SHALL, REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT THE RENT DURING THE PERIOD OF REPAIR BE REDUCED TO AN AMOUNT WHICH, IN LESSOR'S OPINION, BEARS THE SAME RATIO TO THE RENT PROVIDED FOR HEREIN AS THE PORTION OF THE LEASED PREMISES THAN AVAILABLE FOR USE BEARS TO THE ENTIRE LEASED PREMISES. UPON COMPLETION OF SUCH REPAIRS THE RENT SHALL THEREAFTER 10: 21: 31 10 OCT 1983 PAGE S 141. BE PAID AS PROVIDED FOR HEREIN AS THE PORTION OF THE LEASED PREMISES THEN AVAILABLE FOR USE BEARS TO THE ENTIRE LEASED PREMISES. UPON COMPLETION OF SUCH REPAIRS THE RENT SHALL THEREAFTER BE PAID AS PROVIDED IN THE PARAGRAPH ABOVE DESIGNATED RENT. (12) DEFAULT IN THE EVENT THE TENANT SHALL FAIL TO PAY ANY RENT WHEN DUE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THIS LEASE OR DO OR FAIL TO DO ANY OTHER THING, CONDITION, COVENANT OR REQUIREMENT OF THIS LEASE, AND SUCH DEFAULT SHALL CONTINUE FOR A PERIOD OF THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER WRITTEN NOTICE DELIVERED TO TENANT AT THE LEASED PREMISES OF SUCH DEFAULT, THE LESSOR, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO ANY OTHER RIGHTS OR REMEDIES THAT IT MAY HAVE, SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT, IMMEDIATELY OR AT ANY TIME THEREAFTER, TO RE-ENTER THE LEASED PREMISES AND REMOVE ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY FROM THE LEASED PREMISES. IN THE EVENT THE TENANT SHALL NEGLECT TO KEEP OR PERFORM ANY OTHER COVENANT, AGREEMENT OR CONDITION OF THIS LEASE OR SHALL FAIL TO CONFORM TO ANY OF THE BUILDING RULES AND REGULATIONS NOW IN FORCE OR HEREAFTER ADOPTED BY THE LESSOR, THE LESSOR SHALL GIVE WRITTEN NOTICE OF SUCH DEFAULT TO THE TENANT; AND IN THE EVENT THAT SUCH DEFAULT IS NOT RECTIFIED WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH NOTICE, THEN THE LESSOR SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO ENTER THE LEASED PREMISES IMMEDIATELY OR AT ANY TIME THEREAFTER AND REMOVE THE TENANT THEREFROM, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO ANY OTHER REMEDIES OF THE LESSOR. IN THE EVENT OF ANY SUCH RE-ENTRY, THE TENANT HEREBY WAIVES ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES WHICH MAY BE CAUSED BY THE RE-ENTRY OF THE LESSOR AND WILL SAVE THE LESSOR HARMLESS FROM ANY LOSS, COST OR DAMAGES OCCASIONED BY LESSOR THEREBY AND NO SUCH RE-ENTRY SHALL BE CONSIDERED OR CONSTRUED TO BE FORCIBLE ENTRY. SHOULD THE LESSOR ELECT TO RE-ENTER THE LEASED PREMISES AS HEREIN PROVIDED, OR SHOULD IT TAKE POSSESSION PURSUANT TO LEGAL PROCEEDINGS, IT MAY EITHER TERMINATE THIS LEASE OR IT MAY, FROM TIME TO TIME, WITHOUT TERMINATING THIS LEASE, RE-LET THE PREMISES OR ANY PART THEREOF ON TENANT 'S ACCOUNT FOR SUCH TIME OR TIMES AND AT SUCH RENTAL OR RENTALS AND UPON SUCH OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS THE LESSOR IN ITS SOLE DISCRETION MAY DEEM ADVISABLE, WITH THE RIGHT TO MAKE ALTERATIONS AND REPAIRS TO THE LEASED PREMISES , AND THE TENANT SHALL PAY THE AMOUNT OF RENT DUE UNDER THIS LEASE TO THE DATE OF THE BEGINNING OF PAYMENT OF RENT PURSUANT TO ANY SUCH RE-LETTING, TOGETHER WITH THE COST OF SUCH RE-LETTING INCLUDING THE COST OF ANY ALTERATIONS AND REPAIRS TO THE LEASED PREMISES, AND TENANT WILL THEREAFTER PAY MONTHLY INSTALLMENTS DURING THE REMAINDER OF THE TERM OF THIS LEASE THE DIFFERENCE, IF ANY, BETWEEN THE RENT COLLECTED FROM SUCH RE-LETTING AND THE RENT RESERVED IN THIS LEASE, IF SUCH RENT COLLECTED IS LESS THAN THAT RESERVED IN THIS LEASE. NO SUCH RE-ENTRY OR TAKING POSSESSION OF THE LEASED PREMISES BY THE LESSOR SHALL BE CONSTRUED AS AN ELECTION ON ITS PART TO TERMINATE THIS LEASE UNLESS A WRITTEN NOTICE OF SUCH INTENTION BE GIVEN TO THE TENANT. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY SUCH RE-LETTING WITHOUT TERMINATION, THE LESSOR MAY AT ANY TIME AFTER THE OCCURRENCE OF ANY DEFAULT SET OUT IN THIS PARAGRAPH NUMBER 12, ELECT TO TERMINATE THIS LEASE AND MAY TERMINATE IT BY GIVING WRITTEN NOTICE TO THAT EFFECT TO THE TENANT. IF THE LESSOR SHALL AT ANY TIME TERMINATE THIS LEASE ON ACCOUNT OF ANY DEFAULT SET OUT IN THIS PARAGRAPH, IN ADDITION TO OTHER 10: 21: 38 10 OCT 1983 PAGE 6 REMEDIES IT MAY HAVE, IT MAY RECOVER FROM THE TENANT ALL DAMAGES THAT IT MAY SUFFER BY REASON OF THE TERMINATION OF THE LEASE, INCLUDING. BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE COST OF RECOVERING POSSESSION OF THE LEASED PREMISES , AND THE EXCESS , IF ANY, OF THE AMOUNT OF RENT AND OTHER AMOUNTS TO BE PAID BY THE TENANT UNDER THE TERMS OF THE LEASE FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE STATED TERM, OVER THE THEN REASONABLE RENTAL VALUE OF THE PREMISES FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE STATED TERM. (13) ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING TENANT SHALL NOT SELL, ASSIGN, PLEDGE OR HYPOTHESCATE THIS LEASE, OR SUBLET THE LEASED PREMISES OR ANY PART THEREOF WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF LESSOR. CONSENT BY LESSOR TO ONE ASSIGNMENT OR SUBLETTING SHALL NOT DESTROY OR OPERATE AS A WAIVER OF THE PROHIBITIONS CONTAINED IN THIS PARAGRAPH AS TO FUTURE ASSIGNMENTS OR LEASES AND ALL SUCH LATER ASSIGNMENTS OR LEASES SHALL BE MADE ONLY WITH LESSOR'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. IN THE EVENT ANY ASSIGNMENT OF THE LEASE OR LETTING OF THE LEASE PREMISES IS CONSENTED TO BY THE LESSOR, TENANT SHALL REMAIN LIABLE TO LESSOR FOR PAYMENT. OF ALL RENT HEREIN PROVIDED FOR AND FOR THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE OF ALL THE CONVENANTS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS LEASE BY ANY ASSIGNEE OR SUBLESSEES TO THE SAME EXTENT AS IF THE LEASE HAD NOT BEEN ASSIGNED OR THE LEASED PREMISES LET. IF THIS LEASE SHALL BE ASSIGNED OR THE PREMISES SUBLET BY TENANT AT A RENTAL THAT EXCEEDS ALL RENTAL TO BE PAID TO LESSOR HEREUNDER, THEN AND IN SUCH EVENT ANY SUCH EXCESS SHALL BE PAID OVER TO LESSOR BY TENANT. (14) BUILDING RULES AND REGULATIONS THE TENANT HAS READ THE RULES AND REGULATIONS HERETO ATTACHED AND MADE A PART HEREOF AND HEREBY AGREES TO ABIDE BY AND CONFORM. TO THE SAME AND TO SUCH FURTHER RULES AND REGULATIONS AS THE LESSOR MAY FROM TIME TO TIME MAKE OR ADOPT FOR THE CARE, PROTECTION AND BENEFIT OF THE BUILDING OR THE GENERAL COMFORT AND WELFARE OF ITS OCCUPANTS. THE TENANT FURTHER AGREES THAT THE LESSOR SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO WAIVE ANY OR ALL OF SUCH RULES IN THE CASE OF ANY ONE OR MORE TENANTS IN THE BUILDING WITHOUT AFFECTING THE TENANT 'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS LEASE. AND SAID RULES AND REGULATIONS AND THAT THE LESSOR SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE NON-CONFORMANCE BY ANY OTHER TENANT TO ANY OF SAID RULES OR REGULATIONS. (15) QUIET .ENJOYMENT THE LESSOR AGREES THAT THE TENANT ON PAYING TH STIPULATED RENTAL AND KEEPING AND PERFORMING THE AGREEMENT AND CONVENANTS HEREIN CONTAINED, SHALL HOLD AND ENJOY THE LEASED PREMISES FOR THE TERM AFORESAID, SUBJECT, HOWEVER, TO THE TERMS OF THIS LEASE. (16) WAIVER THE WAIVER BY LESSOR OF ANY BREACH OF ANY COVENANT OR AGREEMENT HEREIN CONTAINED SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE A WAIVER OF SUCH COVENANT OR AGREEMENT OR ANY SUBSEQUENT BREACH OF THE SAME OR ANY OTHER COVENANT OR AGREEMENT HEREIN CONTAINED. THE SUBSEQUENT ACCEPTANCE OF 10:21: 44 10 OCT 1983 PAGE 7 14e RENT HEREUNDER BY LESSOR SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE A WAIVER OF ANY PRECEDING BREACH BY TENANT OF ANY COVENANT OR AGREEMENT OF THIS LEASE OTHER THAN THE FAILURE OF THE TENANT TO PAY THE PARTICULAR RENTAL SO ACCEPTED, REGARDLESS OF LESSOR'S KNOWLEDGE OF SUCH PRECEDING BREACH AT THE TIME OF ACCEPTANCE OF SUCH RENT. (17) INTEGRATION CLAUSE ANY STIPULATIONS, REPRESENTATIONS, PROMISES OR AGREEMENT, ORAL OR WRITTEN, MADE PRIOR TO OR CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THIS AGREEMENT SHALL HAVE NO LEGAL EQUITABLE CONSEQUENCES, AND THE ONLY AGREEMENT MADE AND BINDING ON THE PARTIES IS CONTAINED HEREIN AND IT IS THE COMPLETE AND TOTAL INTEGRATION OF THE INTENT AND UNDERSTANDING OF LESSOR AND TENANT. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE DULY EXECUTED THIS LEASE AGREEMENT AS OF THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. LESSOR: 'RAN E COUNTY iiip / N. BY: O 4-rivir irir RICHARD E. WHITTED, CHAIRMA' ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: . . . '&1.44 . . . TENANT: THE COMMUNITY SCHOOL FOR PEOPLE UNDER SIX / -�fii■ ems) BY. - w... �� � „ f 10: 21: 46 10 OCT 1983 PAGE 8 14q RULES AND REGULATIONS (1) THE SIDEWALKS, ENTRANCES, HALLWAYS, ELEVATORS, AND STAIRWAYS SHALL. NOT BE OBSTRUCTED BY ANY TENANT OR USED BY HIM FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN FOR INGRESS OR EGRESS. (2) IF THE BUILDING WHERE THE LEASED PREMISES IS LOCATED HAS IN IT CONFERENCE ROOMS, AUDITORIUMS, GYMNASIUMS, GYMATORIUMS, MEETING ROOMS, ETC. , THEIR USE MAY BE SCHEDULED THROUGH THE LESSOR OR HIS AGENT. THE TENANT CAN ONLY SCHEDULE THE USE OF THESE ROOMS FOR HIMSELF, OR HIS AGENCY, ONLY. OTHER INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS MUST CONTACT THE LESSOR OR HIS AGENT DIRECTLY TO SCHEDULE THE USE OF THESE ROOMS . (3) THE LESSOR MAY CHARGE FEES FOR THE USE OF CONFERENCE ROOMS, AND AUDITORIUMS, GYMNASIUMS, GYMATORIUMS, MEETING ROOMS, ETC. , TO OFFSET THE EXPENSE OF PROVIDING THESE ROOMS. (4) NO ADDITIONAL LOCKS SHALL BE PLACED UPON ANY DOORS WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE LESSOR, NOR SHALL ANY DUPLICATE KEYS BE MADE OR OBTAINED OTHER THAN BY OR THROUGH LESSOR. (5) TENANT SHALL NOT MAKE IMPROPER NOISES DISTURBANCES OF ANY KIND, SING, PLAY OR OPERATE MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS, RADIO, OR TELEVISION SETS, OR ANY MACHINES OR DEVICES IN SUCH FASHION, AS MAY BE DEEMED BY LESSOR TO INTERFERE WITH OTHER OCCUPANTS OF THE BUILDING. (6) THE INSTALLATION OF WINDOW SHADES, VENITION BLINDS , DRAPERIES AND CURTAINS MAY BE INSTALLED SUBJECT TO LESSOR'S APPROVAL OF METHOD OF INSTALLATION INCLUDING HANGING HARDWARE AND OF COLOR AND TEXTURE OF ANY SUCH WINDOW COVERINGS. (7) TENANT OR THEIR EMPLOYER; SHALL NOT: A. KEEP ANIMALS OR BIRDS ON THE PREMISES. B. ALLOW BICYCLES OR SIMILAR VEHICLES IN THE BUILDING. C. THROW ANYTHING THROUGH WINDOWS OR DOWN STAIRWAYS. D. LEAVE PREMISES UNOCCUPIED WITHOUT LOCKING ALL DOORS, EXTINGUISHING LIGHTS AND TURNING OFF WATER OUTLETS. E. INSTALL OR OPERATE VENDING MACHINES OF ANY KIND WITHOUT CONSENT OF LESSOR. F. USE PREMISES FOR LODGING ROOMS, GAMBLING OR ANY IMMORAL PURPOSE. G. OPEN WINDOWS WHILE AIR-CONDITIONING SYSTEM IS OPERATING. H. KEEP KEROSENE, BURNING FLUID AND OTHER HIGHLY INFLAMMABLE MATERIAL ON THE PREMISES WITHOUT LESSOR'S CONSENT. I . MAKE ADJUSTMENTS TO HEATING AND AIR-CONDITIONING CONTROLS, PLUMBING 10:21: 51 10 OCT 1983 PAGE 9 14 APPARATUS, ELECTRICL FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT, WINDOWS AND DOORS, (NOTIFY LESSOR IF ADJUSTMENTS ARE REQUIRED OR DESIRED). J. INSTALL ANY ANCHORAGE, SUPPORTING OR BRACING DEVICES INTO FLOOR, WALL PARTITIONS OR CEILINGS. (NOTIFY LESSOR IF ANY SUCH DEVISES ARE DESIRED) . K. BLOCK OR OBSTRUCT ANY ENTRANCES OR EXITS, INCLUDING FIRE EXITS. (8) THE POSSESSION, SELLING OR CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES OR ILLEGAL DRUGS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED ON THE LEASED PROPERTY, THE BUILDING OR THE GROUNDS. (9) THE LESSOR SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES DUE TO STOPPAGES OR MALFUNCTIONS OF ANY SORT OF THE ELEVATORS, HEAT AND AIR-CONDITIONING SYSTEMS, PLUMBING FIXTURES AND THE ELECTRICAL POWER AND LIGHTING SYSTEM. (10) THE LESSOR RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MAKE SUCH OTHER AND FURTHER REASONABLE RULES AND REGULATIONS AS IN ITS JUDGEMENT IT MAY FROM TIME TO TIME DEEM NECESSARY FOR THE SAFETY, CARE AND CLEANLINESS OF THE PREMISES, AND FOR THE PRESERVATION OF GOOD ORDER THEREIN. (11) THE LESSOR RESERVES THE RIGHT TO DESIGNATE THE TIME WHEN AND METHOD BY WHICH FREIGHT, FURNITURE, SAFES, GOODS, MERCHANDISE AND OTHER ARTICLES MAY BE BROUGHT INTO OR TAKEN FROM THE BUILDING AND THE LEASED PREMISES. REPAIRS, PAINTING, MATERIAL MOVING AND OTHER SIMILAR WORK THAT MAY BE DONE TO THE LEASED PREMISES BY OR FOR TENANT SHALL BE PERFORMED BY ANY. WORKMEN EMPLOYED, DESIGNATED OR APPROVED BY THE LESSOR. (12) THE LESSOR RESERVES THE RIGHT AT ALL TIMES TO EXCLUDE . BOOTBLACKS, NEWSBOYS, (LOITERERS) VENDORS, SOLICITORS AND PEDDLERS FROM THE BUILDING, AND TO REQUIRE REGISTRATIONS, SATISFACTORY IDENTIFICATION AND CREDENTIALS FROM ALL PERSONS SEEKING ACCESS TO ANY PART OF THE BUILDING, AT TIMES OTHER THAN DURING ORDINARY BUSINESS HOURS. THE LESSOR WILL EXCERCISE ITS BEST JUDGEMENT IN THE EXECUTION OF SUCH CONTROL BUT SHALL NOT BE HELD LIABLE FOR THE GRANTING OR REFUSAL OF SUCH ACCESS . (13) THE LESSOR RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REGULATE AND CONTROL ALL PARKING LOTS AND DRIVEWAYS INCLUDING ASSIGNMENT OF PARKING AREAS, AND INSTITUTING TRAFFIC PATTERNS . 10: 21: 56 10 OCT 1983 i .. . . �NIOT4 CZTI�J`Ir� St=.�V. _ - �.�0�=td�L ��iU IG!✓�j MAILS p+f'SA 2,35 r t6 5r. I��OV `'� RMA OrTlCVi I IMAL 51' 17 6 C : r - F&.-- J6— L=x�rr, a _ j i''Ia�l3TIN[� fSIK . W 0 SR r r5o s✓� ' J=6 - 00A i �f CAnE b 38 S� �xlsT 153v ;-/ -'Ah9A A uocATim IYAGNAM -PT cos o' aI D G1 Ra 4-7 I jOh1105 5 S1= lt>Al_ 106 5 t sF NORTHSIDE MULTIPURPOSE CTR ORANGE COUNTY CHAPEL HILL N C ' E . 0 X41 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION A 6 ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NO. � MEETING DATE JUNE 17, 1986 SUBJECT: LEASE RENEWAL FOR EFLAND RESCUE UNIT BUILDING *********************************************************************** DEPARTMENT: PURCHASING & CENTRAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEARING YES _,X NO ************************************************************************** ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: PAM JONES EXT 497 LEASE RENEWAL ORIGINAL 1985 LEASE PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH 732-8181 HILLSBOROUGH 732-9361 CHAPEL HILL 967-9251 MEBANE 227-2031 DURHAM 688-7331 ************************************************************************** PURPOSE: To approve lease renewal between the Efland Rescue Unit, Efland Volunteer Fire Company, Inc. and Orange County for the building used as the Efland Rescue Unit Building in Efland, North Carolina. NEED: An agreement was entered into in July 1985, between the above named parties for a building to be used as the Efland Rescue Unit Building. The lessor is desirous this arrangement be continued under the same terms and conditions. IMPACT: Monetary impact would be $1.00 . RECOMMENDATION: Approve lease renewal between the Efland Rescue Unit, Efland Volunteer Fire Company, Inc. , and Orange County for the Efland Rescue Unit building in Efland, North Carolina to continue for a period of one year commencing July 1, 1986 and terminating at 12:00 midnight June 30, 1987. LEASE AGREEMENT 1 4 C RENEWAL NORTH CAROLINA ORANGE COUNTY WHEREAS , A lease agreement was made and entered into as of the 5th day of July, 1985 by and between Efland Rescue Unit and Efland Volunteer Fire Company, Inc. , LESSOR Party of the First Part, and Orange County, LESSEE , Part of the Second Part, for premises known as the Efland Rescue Unit Building in Efland, North Carolina. WHEREAS , the LESSOR and the LESSEE wish to renew the lease -agreement. NOW THEREFORE , J,E45SOR and LESSEE mutually agree to the following: (1) The lease agreement will be continued for a period of one year commencing on July 1, 1986 and terminate at 12:00 midnight on June 30, 1987. (2) All other terms and conditions will remain the same. This agreed to, the day of 1986. Party of the First Part: BY: W.C. Dawkins for Efland Rescue Unit and Efland Volunteer Fire Co. , Lessor BY: Jerry Wilder, for Efland Rescue Unit and Efland Volunteer Fire Company, Lessor Party of the Second Part: BY: Don Willhoit, Chair Orange County Board of Commissioners NORTH CAROLINA 1.41. LEASE ORANGE COUNTY This lease contract, made this the S ✓'day of July, 1985, by and between EFLAND RESCUE UNIT and EFLAND VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY, INC. a North Carolina Corporation, Lessor, Party of the First Part, and ORANGE COUNTY, Lessee, Party of the Second Part; W I T N E S S E T H: ! That the Lessor hereby demises unto the Lessee the premises i S known as the EFLAND RESCUE UNIT BUILDING in Efland, North Carolina and more particularly described as follows: ✓BEGINNING at Curtis W. Brown's Southeast corner in the public road on South side of Southern Railway in Efland, N.C.; thence along said public road 106 x feet to a corner in the public road, this being a John Efland, Jr. Northeast corner; thence West = along John Efland, Jr. line 200 feet to a stake; E thence North 106 feet to a stake Efland and Brown's _ 6 corner; thence East along Brown's line 200 feet to S the BEGINNING CORNER, containing one-half acre more or less. The corner stakes for the corners in the x road are set back 10 feet in the line from the ' W corner in the public road. Y This lease is executed upon the following terms and conditions: 1. The Lessee agrees to pay rent of $1.00 for the term. 8 The term shall be for one year with an option to renew for an additional one year term. 2. This lease shall not be assigned, nor the leased premises sublet, without the written consent of the Lessors. 3. All repairs shall be made by the Lessee, it being understood and agreed that the premises are being demised as they now -1- • 1so stand, without obligation on the part of the Lessors to make repairs or improvements. 4. Lessee may remodel or renovate the premises and make any improvements desired consistent with the operation of the premises as a rescue unit building. Prior notice of all remodelling, renovation and improvements. shall be given.td Lessors and written permission must be obtained. 5. The Lessee covenants and agrees that it will take good care of the premises and upon the termination of. this lease will surrender the said premises in as good order and condition as at the • beginning of this lease, ordinary wear and tear excepted and that they will make no unlawful or offensive use of the premises. K ' 6. If during the term of this lease the leased premises are a - so damaged by fire, tornado, or other catastrophe or casualty as to • U _ - render the same uninhabitable, this lease shall terminate. Td In TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set - their hands and seals, this the day and year first above written. p I q PARTY OF THE FIRST PART: W. C. DAWKINS for EFLAND RESCUE UNIT and EFLAND VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY, Lessor BY: JERRY' 7ILDEx , for EFLAND RESCUE UNIT and EF VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY, Lessor PAR.TYA 'THE SECOND PART: By: &LW ' DON WILLUOIT, CRAM' . ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS I -2- I . ORANGE COUNTY 151 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AG D ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NO. f..7 MEETING DATE JUNE 17, 1986 SUBJECT: LEASE RENEWAL WITH WAKE OPPORTUNITIES, INC. *********************************************************************** DEPARTMENT: PURCHASING & CENTRAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEARING YES X NO ************************************************************************** ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: PAM JONES EXT 497 LEASE RENEWAL ORIGINAL 1983 LEASE PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH 732-8181 HILLSBOROUGH 732-9361 CHAPEL HILL 967-9251 MEBANE 227-2031 DURHAM 688-7331 ************************************************************************** PURPOSE: To approve lease renewal between Wake Opportunities, Inc. , Tenant, and Orange County, lessor for space used as a Day Care Center at Cedar Grove Multipurpose Center, Cedar Grove, North Carolina. NEED: An agreement was entered into in August, 1983 between Wake Opportunities, Inc. and Orange County for space to be used as a day care (Head Start Program) at Cedar Grove Multi- purpose Center. Both lessor and tenant are in agreement that the lease should be renewed with the same terms and conditions for an additional one year period. IMPACT: Program continuation. RECOMMENDATION: Approve lease renewal between Wake Opportunities, Inc. , Tenant and Orange County, lessor for space to be used as a Day Care Center at Cedar Grove Multi- purpose Center, Cedar Grove, N. C. for a period of one year commencing July 1, 1986 and terminating at 12:00 midnight June 30, 1987; authorize Chair to sign said lease renewal on behalf of Orange County. LEASE AGREEMENT RENEWAL NORTH CAROLINA QRANGE COUNTY WHEREAS , A lease agreement was made and entered into as of the 29th day of August, 1983 by and between Orange County, JJE$SOR and Wake-Opportunities, Inc. , TENANT , for space to be used as a Day Care Center at the Cedar Grove Multipurpose, N.C. HWY 86 N. WHEREAS , the LESSOR and the TENANT wish to renew the lease agreement. NOW THEREFORE , LESSOR and TENANT mutually agree to the following: (1) The lease agreement will be continued for a period of one year commencing on July 1, 1986 and ending at 12:00 midnight on the day of June 30, 1986. (2) All other terms and conditions will remain the same. This agreed to, the day of 1986. LESSOR: Orange County BY: Don Willhoit Chairman, Orange County Board of Commissioners ATTEST: TENANT: _ Wake Opportunities, Inc. 154 PAGE 1 LEASE AGREEMENT NORTH CAROLINA ORANGE COUNTY A THE LEASE _AGREEMENT MADE THIS DAY OF . r 19. BETWEEN ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WHOSE PRINC PI AL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS 106 EAST MARGARET LANE, HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA, HEREINAFTER CALLED THE LESSOR AND MAKE OPPORTUNITIES, INC. WHOSE PRINCIPAL OF PLACE OF BUSINESS IS: 567 E. HARGETT ST. RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA HEREINAFTER CALLED THE TENANT. WITNESSETH IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL BENEFITS TO THE LESSOR AND TO THE TENANT, AND OF THE CONVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS UPON THE PAR1 OF THE LESSOR AND THE TENANT TO BE KEPT AND PERFORMED, THE LESSOR HEREBY DEMISES AND LEASES TO THE TENANT, AND THE TENANT LEASES AND TAKES FROM THE LESSOR THE PREMISES SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLAN ATTACHED HERE TO AS EXHIBIT A AND BY REFERENCE MADE A PART HERE OF (HEREIN CALLED THE LEASED PREMISES) LOCATED AT: CEDAR GROVE MULTIPURPOSE CENTER MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A, ATTACHED HERE TO BE OCCUPIED AND USED AS A DAY CARE CENTER AND FOR THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS HEREIN SET FORTH. (1) TERM OF LEASE: THE TERM HEREOF SHALL COMMENCE ON THE FIRST DAY OF JANUARY, 1953 AND SHALL END AT 12: 00 MIDNIGHT ON THE 30TH OF JUNE, 1984. (2) RENTAL: TENANT SHALL PAY TO THE LESSOR THE SUM OF TWENTY SEVEN THOUSAND, TWO HUNDRED FOURTY DOLLARS ($27,240) PER ANNUM, PAYABLE IN MONTHLY INSTALLMENTS OF TWO THOUSAND, TWO HUNDRED SEVENTY DOLLARS (52,270) EACH DUE ON THE FIRST DAY OF EACH MONTH, INADVANCE DURING THE TERM OF THIS LEASE. THIS RENT SHALL BE SUSPENDED IN FAVOR OF INKINU CONTRIBUTION FROM THE LESSOR TO THE TENANT. (3) UTILITIES: THE TENANT SHALL PAY FUR ELECTRICITY AND FUEL FOR HEAT BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FORMULA: TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE USED BY TENANT (6, 150 So. FT. ) DIVIDED BY TOTAL USABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE BUILDING WHERE THE LEASED PROPERTY IS LOCATED; (33,773 SQ. FT. ) , TIMES THE AMOUNT AS THE ELECTRICITY AND FUEL FOR HEAT BILLS RECEIVED BY THE LESSOR DURING THE TERM OF THIS LEASE FOR THE BUILDING WHERE THE LEASED PROPERTY IS LOCATED. THE LESSOR SHALL SEND THE TENANT UN A TIMELY BASIS A STATEMENT ITEMIZING SUCH UTILITY CHARGES. PAYMENT SHALL BE DUE TO THE LESSOR WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE ON THE STATEMENTS. THE LESSOR SHALL PAY FOR ALL HATER AND SEEKER CHARGES. 11 : 07:21 31 MAY 1983 54 PAGE 3 AND• TO GRANT LICENSES TO ENTER THE LEASED PREMISES AT ANY REASONABLE TIME AFTER HAVING GIVEN THE TENANT NOTICES OF ITS INTENT TO SO ENTER (A) TO EXAMINE THE LEASED PREMISES, (B) TO MAKE ALTERATIONS AkD REPAIRS TO THE LEASED PREMISES OR TO THE BUILDING (INCLUDING THE RIGHT, DURING THE PROGRESS OF SUCH ALTERATIONS OR REPAIRS, TO KEEP AND STORE WITHIN THE LEASED PREMISES ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS, TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT) , (C) FOR ANY PURPOSE WHICH THE LESSOR MAY DEEM NECESSARY FOR THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE BUILDING, OR (D) TO EXHIBIT THE LEASED PREMISES TO APPLICANTS. NO SUCH ENTRY SHALL IN ANY MANNER AFFECT THE OBLIGATIONS AND CONVENANTS OF THIS LEASE. (8) USE AND OCCUPANCY: TENANT AGREES THAT THE LEASED PREMISES WILL BE USED ONLY FOR THE PURPOSE HEREINBEFORE SET OUT IN THIS LEASE, THAT NO UNLAWFUL USE OF THE LEASED PREMISES WILL BE MADE, THAT NO SIGN, NAME, LEGEND, NOTICE OR ADVERTISEMENT OF ANY KIND WILL BE FIXED, PAINTED OR DISPLAYED ON ANY PART OF THE BUILDING, EXCEPT THAT THE NAME AND BUSINESS OR PROFESSION OF THE TENANT MAY BE PAINTED WITH APPROPRIATE LETTERING APPROVED BY THE LESSOR ON THE DOOR OR DOORS TO THE SPACE LEASED BY THE TENANT OR AS OTHERWISE AGREED TO BY THE LESSOR; AND UPON THE TERMINATION OF THIS LEASE, TENANT WILL VACATE AND SURRENDER POSSESSION OF THE LEASED PREMISES TO THE LESSOR IN AS GOOD CONDITION AS THE LEASED PREMISES WERE AT THE COMMENCEMENT OF THIS LEASE, ORDINARY WEAR AND TEAR EXPECTED. THE LESSOR RESERVES THE RIGHT TO USE THE LEASED PREMISES FOR ANY REASONABLE PURPOSE, AS LONG AS THE USE OF SUCH PREMISES DOES NOT UNDULY AFFECT THE OPERATION OF THE TENANT. THE LESSOR SHALL BE THE FINAL ARSITOR OF WHETHER THE PROPOSED USE BY THE LESSOR UNDULY AFFECTS THE OPERATION OF THE TENANT. THE LESSOR AGREES TO ALLOW THE TENANT TO HAVE USE OF THE KITCHEN AND DINING ROOM FACILITIES LOCATED IN THE PREMISES ON AN AS NEEDED BASIS. THE TENANT AGREES TO PROPERLY CLEAN THE KITCHEN AND DINING AREA AND EQUIPMENT TO SANITATION GRADE A STANDARDS AS ISSUED BY THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA AFTER EACH USE. IT IS UNDERSTOOD BY THE TENANT THAT SECTION 9, INSURANCE, AND SECTION 10, INDEMNITY, OF THIS LEASE SHALL ALSO APPLY TO THE USE OF THE KITCHEN. THE LESSOR RESERVES THE RIGHT TO SCHEDULE AND/OR REGULATE THE USE OF THE KITCHEN FACILITIES IN SUCH A WAY TO INSURE EQUITABLE AND PROPER USE OF THE FACILITIES BY ANY PARTY AUTHORIZED BY THE LESSOR TO USE SUCH FACILITIES, INCLUDING THE TENANT. FURTHERMORE, THE LESSOR MAY REVOKE THE TENANT 'S RIGHT TO USE THE KITCHEN AND DINING FACILITIES AT ANY TIME AFTER THIRTY (30) DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE. (9) INSURANCE IF, BECAUSE OF ANYTHING DONE, CAUSED TO BE DONE, PERMITTED OR OMITTED BY THE TENANT, THE PREMIUM RATE FOR ANY KIND OF INSURANCE AFFECTING THE BUILDING SHALL SE RAISED, THE TENANT AGREES THAT THE AMOUNT OF THE INCREASE IN PREMIUM WHICH THE LESSOR SHALL BE THEREBY OBLIGATED TO PAY FOR SUCH INSURANCE SHALL BE PAID BY THE TENANT TO THE LESSOR ON DEMAND, AND THAT IF THE LESSOR SHALL DEMAND THAT THE TENANT 09:20 :44 19 AUG 1983 1)4 E u REMEDY THE CONDITION WHICH CAUSED THE INCREASE IN THE INSURANCE PREMIUM RATE THE TENANT WILL REMEDY SUCH CONDITION WITHIN. FIVE (5) DAYS AFTER SUCH DEMAND. THE TENANT AGREES THAT THE TENANT SHALL NOT DO, OR CAUSE TO BE DONE, UR PERMIT ON THE LEASED PREMISES ANYTHING DEEMED EXTRA HAZARDOUS ON ACCOUNT OF FIRE. LESSOR SHALL CARRY FIRE AND EXTENDED COVERAGE INSURANCE INSURING ITS INTEREST IN THE BUILDING AND THE LEASED PREMISES. TENANT SHALL CARRY FIRE AND EXTENDED COVERAGE INSURANCE INSURING ITS INTEREST, IF ANY, IN IMPROVEMENTS TO ' UR IN THE LEASED PREMISES AND ITS INTEREST IN ITS OFFICE FURNITURE, EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES AND OTHER PERSONAL PROPERTY. BOTH THE LESSOR AND THE TENANT HEREBY WAIVE ANY CLAIMS OR RIGHTS OF ACTION WHICH THE ONE MAY HAVE AGAINST THE OTHER FOR LOSS OR DAMAGE COVERED BY SUCH INSURANCE POLICIES AND BOTH THE LESSOR AND TENANT COVENANT AND AGREE THAT EACH OF THEM WILL OBTAIN A WAIVER FROM ITS CARRIER OF SUCH INSURANCE RELEASING SUCH CARRIER' S SUBROGATION RIGHTS AS AGAINST THE OThER PARTY. (10) INDEMNITY THE TENANT AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND SAVE HARMLESS THE LESSOR AND THE AGENTS , SERVANTS AND EMPLOYEES OF THE LESSOR AGAINIST AND FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS BY UR ON BEHALF OF ANY PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION ARISING BY REASON OF INJURY TO PERSON OR DAMAGE TO PROPERTY OCCURRING IN THE LEASED PREMISES OCCASIONED IN WHOLE OR IN PART BY ANY ACT ON THE PART OF THE TENANT OR AN EMPLOYEE WHILE ACTING WITHIN THE SCOPE OF EMPLOYMENT, AGENT, VISITOR, ASSIGN OR UNDERTENANT OF THE TENANT OR 6Y REASON OF ANY UNLAWFUL USE OF THE LEASED PREMISES OR ANY BREACH, VIOLATION OR NON-PERFORMANCE OF ANY COVENANT IN THIS LEASE ON THE PART OF THE TENANT TO BE OBSERVED OR PERFORMED, AND ALSO FOR ANY MATTER OR THING GROWING OUT OF THE OCCUPANCY OR USE OF THE LEASED PREMISES BY THE TENANT OR ANYONE HOLDING OR CLAIMING TO HOLD THROUGH OR UNDER THE TENANT. TENANT AGREES TO PAY FOR ALL DAMAGES TO THE BUILDING AS WELL AS ALL OCCUPANTS THEREOF, CAUSED BY TENANT ' S MISUSE OR NEGLECT OF SAID LEASED PREMISES, ITS APPARTUS OR APPURTENANCES. LESSOR SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO TENANT FOR ANY DAMAGE BY OR FROM ANY ACT OR NEGLIGENCE OF ANY CO-TENANT OR OTHER OCCUPANT OF THE BUILDING OR BY ANY OWNER OR OCCUPANT OF ADJOINING CONTINUOUS PROPERTY. ( 11) FIRE OR OTHER CASUALTY IN THE EVENT THE BUILDING IN WHICH THE LEASED PREMISES ARE LOCATED IS DESTROYED BY FIRE, UNAVOIDABLE ACCIDENT OR CASUALTY, THIS LEASE SHALL THEREUPON TERMINATE. IN THE EVENT THE BUILDING IN WHICH THE LEASED PREMISES ARE LOCATED IS DAMAGED BY FIRE, UNAVOIDABLE ACCIDENT OR CASUALTY TO SUCH AN EXTENT THAT IN LESSOR ' S OPINION► THE PORTION OF SAID BUILDINIG IN WHICH THE LEASED PREMISES ARE SPECIFICALLY LOCATED CANNOT BE REPAIRED WITHIN NINETY (90) DAYS TO ITS APPROXIMATE CONDITION EXISTING IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING SUCH FIRE, UNAVOIDABLE ACCIDENT OR CASUALTY, THIS LEASE SHALL THEREUPON TERMINATE. 11 : 01:d9 31 MAY 1983 • 5t PAGE S IN THE EVENT THE PORTION OF THE BUILDING IN. wHICH THE LEASED PREMISES ARE SPECIFICALLY LOCATED DAMAGED BY FIRE, UNAVOIDABLE ACCIDENT, OR CASUALTY AND THE SAME CAN BE REPAIRED WITHIN NINETY (90) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FIRE, UNAVOIDABLE ACCIDENT OR CASUALTY, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE THAT SAID LEASED PREMISES SHALL BE REPAIRED AND RESTORED BY LESSOR TO THE APPROXIMATE CONDITION OF SAID LEASED PREMISES EXISTING BEFORE SAIL) FIRE, UNAVOIDABLE ACCIDENT OR CASUALTY, AND THIS LEASE SHALL REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT THE RENT DURING THE PERIOD OF REPAIR BE REDUCED TO AN AMOUNT WHICH, IN LESSOR'S OPINION, BEARS THE SAME RATIO TO THE RENT PROVIDED FOR HEREIN AS THE PORTION OF THE LEASED PREMISES THAN AVAILABLE FOR USE BEARS TO THE ENTIRE LEASED PREMISES. UPON COMPLETION OF SUCH REPAIRS THE RENT SHALL THEREAFTER BE PAID AS PROVIDED FOR HEREIN AS THE PORTION OF THE LEASED PREMISES THEN AVAILABLE FOR USE BEARS TO THE ENTIRE LEASED PREMISES. UPON COMPLETION OF SUCH REPAIRS THE RENT SHALL THEREAFTER BE PAID AS PROVIDED IN THE PARAGRAPH ABOVE DESIGNATED RENT. (12) DEFAULT IN THE EVENT THE TENANT SHALL FAIL TO PAY ANY RENT WHEN DUE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ThE TERMS OF THIS LEASE OR DO OR FAIL TO DO ANY OTHER THING, CONDITION, COVENANT OR REQUIREMENT OF THIS LEASE, AND SUCH DEFAULT SHALL CONTINUE FOR A PERIOD OF THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER WRITTEN NOTICE DELIVERED TO TENANT AT THE LEASED PREMISES OF SUCH DEFAULT, THE LESSOR, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO ANY OTHER RIGHTS OR REMEDIES THAT IT MAY HAVE, SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT, IMMEDIATELY OR AT ANY TIME THEREAFTER, . TO RE-ENTER THE LEASED PREMISES AND REMOVE ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY FROM THE LEASED PREMISES. IN THE EVENT THE TENANT SHALL NEGLECT TO KEEP OR PERFORM ANY OTHER COVENANT, AGREEMENT OR CONDITION OF THIS LEASE OR SHALL FAIL TO CONFORM TO ANY OF THE BUILDING RULES AND REGULATIONS NOwv IN FORCE UR HEREAFTER ADOPTED BY THE LESSOR, THE LESSOR SHALL GIVE WRITTEN NOTICE OF SUCH DEFAULT TO THE TENANT; ' AND IN THE EVENT THAT SUCH DEFAULT IS NOT RECTIFIED WITHIN TEN ( 10) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH NOTICE, THEN THE LESSOR SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO ENTER THE LEASED PREMISES IMMEDIATELY OR AT ANY TIME THEREAFTER AND REMOVE THE TENANT THEREFROM, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO ANY OTHER REMEDIES OF THE LESSOR, IN THE EVENT OF ANY SUCH RE-ENTRY, THE TENANT HEREBY WAIVES ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES WHICH MAY BE CAUSED BY THE RE-ENTRY OF THE LESSOR AND NILE SAVE THE LESSOR HARMLESS FROM ANY LOSS, COST OR DAmAGES OCCASIONED BY LESSOR THEREHY AND NO SUCH RE-ENTRY SHALL BE CONSIDERED OR CONSTRUED TO BE FORCIBLE ENTRY. SHOULD THE LESSOR ELECT TO RE-ENTER THE LEASED PREMISES AS HEREIN PROVIDED, OR SHOULD IT TAKE POSSESSION PURSUANT TO LEGAL PROCEEDINGS, IT MAY EITHER TERMINATE THIS LEASE OR IT MAY, FROM TIME TO TIME, WITHOUT TERMINATING THIS LEASE, RE-LET THE PREMISES OR ANY PART THEREOF ON TENANT' S ACCOUNT FOR SUCH TIME OR TIMES AND AT SUCH RENTAL OR RENTALS AND UPON SUCH OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS THE LESSOR IN ITS SOLE DISCRETION MAY DEEM ADVISABLE, WITH THE RIGHT TO MAKE ALTERATIONS AND REPAIRS TO THE LEASED PREMISES, AND THE TENANT SHALL PAY THE AMOUNT. OF RENT DUE UNDER THIS LEASE TO THE DATE OF THE BEGINNING OF PAYMENT OF RENT PURSUANT TO ANY SUCH RE-LETTING, TOGETHER WITH THE COST OF SUCH RE-LETTING INCLUDING THE COST OF ANY ALTERATIONS AND REPAIRS TO THE LEASED PREMISES, AND TENANT WILL THEREAFTER PAY 11 : 07 :32 S1 MAY 1983 15 , • PAGE 6 MONTHLY INSTALLMENTS DURING THE REMAINDER OF THE TERM OF THIS LEASE THE DIFFERENCE. IF ANY, BETWEEN THE RENT COLLECTED FROM SUCH RE-LETTING AND THE RENT RESERVED IN THIS LEASE, IF SUCH RENT COLLECTED IS LESS THAN THAT RESERVED IN THIS LEASE. NO SUCH RE-ENTRY ON TAKING POSSESSION OF THE LEASED PREMISES BY THE LESSOR SHALL BE CONSTRUED AS : AN ELECTION ON ITS PART TO TERMINATE THIS LEASE UNLESS A WRITTEN NOTICE OF SUCH INTENTION BE GIVEN TO THE TENANT. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY SUCH RE-LETTING WITHOUT TERMINATION, THE LESSOR MAY AT ANY TIME AFTER THE OCCURRENCE OF ANY DEFAULT SET OUT IN THIS PARAGRAPH NUMBER 12. ELECT TO TERMINATE THIS LEASE AND MAY TERMINATE IT BY GIVING WRITTEN NOTICE TO THAT EFFECT TO THE TENANT. IF THE LESSOR SHALL AT ANY TIME TERMINATE THIS LEASE ON ACCOUNT OF ANY DEFAULT SET OUT IN THIS PARAGRAPH, IN ADDITION TO OTHER REMEDIES IT MAY HAVE. IT MAY RECOVER FROM THE TENANT ALL DAMAGES THAT IT MAY SUFFER BY REASON OF THE TERMINATION OF THE LEASE, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE COST OF RECOVERING POSSESSION OF THE LEASED' PREMISES, AND THE EXCESS , IF ANY, OF THE AMOUNT OF RENT AND OTHER AMOUNTS TO BE PAID BY THE TENANT UNDER THE TERMS OF THE LEASE FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE STATED TERM, OVER THE THEN REASONABLE RENTAL VALUE OF THE PREMISES FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE STATED TERM. ( 13) ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING TENANT SHALL NOT SELL, ASSIGN, PLEDGE OR HYPOTHESCATE THIS LEASE, OR SUBLET THE LEASED PREMISES OR ANY PART THEREOF WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF LESSOR. CONSENT BY LESSOR TO ONE ASSIGNMENT OR SUBLETTING SHALL NOT DESTROY UR OPERATE AS A WAIVER OF THE PROHIBITIONS CONTAINED IN THIS PARAGRAPH AS TO FUTURE ASSIGNMENTS OR LEASES AND ALL SUCH LATER ASSIGNMENTS OR LEASES SHALL BE MADE ONLY WITH LESSOR ' S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. IN THE EVENT ANY ASSIGNMENT OF THE LEASE OR LETTING OF THE LEASE PREMISES IS CONSENTED TO BY THE LESSOR, TENANT SHALL REMAIN LIABLE TO LESSOR FOR PAYMENT OF ALL RENT HEREIN PROVIDED FOR AND FOR THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE OF ALL THE CONVENANTS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS LEASE BY ANY ASSIGNEE OR SUBLESSEES TO THE SAME EXTENT AS IF THE LEASE HAD NOT BEEN ASSIGNED OR THE LEASED PREMISES LET. IF THIS LEASE SHALL BE ASSIGNED OR THE PREMISES SUBLET BY TENANT AT A RENTAL THAT EXCEEDS ALL RENTAL TO BE PAID TO LESSOR HEREUNDER, THEN AND IN SUCH EVENT ANY SUCH EXCESS SHALL BE PAID OVER TO LESSOR BY TENANT. (14) BUILDING RULES AND REGULATIONS THE TENANT HAS READ THE RULES AND REGULATIONS HERETO ATTACHED AND MADE A PART HEREOF AND HEREBY AGREES TO ABIDE BY AND CONFORM TO THE SAME AND TO SUCH FURTHER RULES AND REGULATIONS AS THE LLaSOR HAY FROM TIME TO TIME MAKE OR ADOPT FOR THE CARE, PROTECTION ANi) BENEFIT OF THE BUILDING OR THE GENERAL COMFORT AND WELFARE OF ITS OCCUPANTS, THE TENANT FURTHER AGREES THAT THE LESSOR SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO WAIVE ANY OR ALL OF SUCH RULES IN THE CASE OF ANY ONE OR MORE TENANTS IN THE BUILDING WITHOUT AFFECTING THE TENANT ' S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS LtASE AND SAID RULES AND REGULATIONS AND THAT THE LESSOR SHALL NUT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE NON-CONFORMANCE BY ANY OTHER TENANT TO ANY OF SAID ROLES OR REGULATIONS. 11 : 0 ! :34 31 MAY 1983 . i5 PAGE 7 (15) LESSOR 'S REPRESENTATIVE THE LESSOR ' S REPRESENTATIVE FUR ALL MATTERS CONCERNING THIS LEASE AND/OR THE USE OF THE PREMISES SHALL BE THE ORANGE COUNTY DIRECTOR OF RECREATIOR AND PARKS OR HIS/HER DESIGNEE. ( 16) QUIET ENJOYMENT THE LESSOR AGREES THAT THE TENANT ON PAYING THE STIPULATED RENTAL AND KEEPING AND PERFORMING THE AGREEMENT AND CONVENANTS HEREIN CONTAINED. SHALL HOLD AND ENJOY THE LEASED PREMISES FOR THE TERM AFORESAID, SUBJECT, HONEVER, TO THE PERMS OF THIS LEASE. (17) WAIVER THE WAIVER BY LESSOR OF ANY BREACH OF ANY COVENANT OR AGREEMENT HEREIN CONTAINED SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE A WAIVER OF SUCH COVENANT OR AGREEMENT OR ANY SUBSEQUENT BREACH OF THE SAME OR ANY OTHER COVENANT OR AGREEMENT HEREIN CONTAINED. THE SUBSEQUENT ACCEPTANCE OF RENT HEREUNDER BY LESSOR SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE A WAIVER OF ANY. PRECEDING BREACH BY TENANT OF ANY. COVENANT UR AGREEMENT OF . THIS LEASE OTHER THAN THE FAILURE OF THE TENANT TO PAY TO THE PARTICULAR RENTAL SO ACCEPTED, REGARDLESS OF LESSOR 'S KNOWLEDGE OF SUCH PRECEDING BREACH AT THE TIME OF ACCEPTANCE OF SUCH RENT. ( 18) INTEGRATION CLAUSE ANY STIPULATIONS, REPRESENTATIONS, PROMISES UR AGREEMENTS, IJ AL OR WRITTEN , MADE PRIOR TO OR CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THIS AGREEaiEtvT SHALL HAVE NO LEGAL UR EQUITABLE CONSEQUENCES, AND THE ONLY AGREEmENT MADE AND BINDING ON THE PARTIES IS CONTAINED HEREIN AND IT IS THE COMPLETE AND TOTAL INTEGRATION OF THE INTENT AND UNDERSTANDING OF LESSOR AND TENANT. IN WITNESS WEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE DULY EXECUTED THIS LEASE AGREEMENT AS OF THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. LESSOR: ORANGE COUNTY 1 � ICHARD E. WHIT ED, CHAIRMA\ ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS TENANT WAKE OPPORTUNITIES, INC. BY. 4AzalNI (26,„„ 11 :07:36 31 MAY 1983 151-1. • PAGE 8 RULES AND REGULATIONS • (1 ) THE SIDEWALKS, ENTRANCES, HALLWAYS, ELEVATORS, AND STAIRWAYS SHALL NOT BE OBSTRUCTED BY ANY TENANT OR USED BY HIM FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN FOR INGRESS OR EGRESS. (2) IF THE BUILDING WHERE THE LEASED PREMISES IS LOCATED HAS IN IT CONFERENCE ROOMS, AUDITORIUMS, GYMNASIUMS, GYMATORIUMS, r1EETING ROOMS, ETC., THEIR USE MAY BE SCHEDULED THROUGH THE LESSOR OR HIS AGENT. THE TENANT CAN ONLY SCHEDULE THE USE OF THESE ROOMS FOR HIMSELF, OR HIS AGENCY, ONLY. OTHER INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS MUST CONTACT THE LESSOR OR HIS AGENT DIRECTLY TO SCHEDULE THE USE OF THESE ROOMS. (3) THE LESSOR MAY CHARGE FEES FOR THE USE OF CONFERENCE ROOMS, AND AUDITORIUMS, GYMNASIUMS, GYMATORIUMS, MEETING ROOMS, ETC. , TU - OFFSET THE EXPENSE OF PROVIDING THESE ROOMS. (4) NO ADDITIONAL LOCKS SHALL BE PLACED UPON ANY DOORS WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE LESSOR, NOR SHALL ANY DUPLICATE KEYS BE MADE OR OBTAINED OTHER THAN BY UR THROUGH LESSOR. (5) TENANT SHALL NUT MAKE IMPROPER NOISES DISTURBANCES OF ANY KIND, SING, PLAY OR OPERATE MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS, RADIO, OR TELEVISION SETS, OR ANY MACHINES OR DEVICES IN SUCH FASHION, AS MAY BE DEEMED BY LESSOR TO INTERFERE WITH OTHER OCCUPANTS OF THE BUILDING. (B) THE INSTALLATION OF WINDOW SHADES, VENITIUN BLINDS, DRAPERIES AND CURTAINS MAY BE INSTALLED SUBJECT TO LESSOR ' S APPROVAL OF METHOD OF INSTALLATION INCLUDING HANGING HARDWARE AND OF COLOR AND TEXTURE OF ANY SUCH WINDOW COVERINGS. (7) TENANT OR THEIR EMPLOYER; SHALL NOT: A. KEEP ANIMALS OR BIRDS ON THE PREMISES. B. ALLOW BICYCLES OR SIMILAR VEHICLES IN THE BUILDING. C. THROW ANYTHING THROUGH WINDOWS OR DUNN STAIRNAYS. U. LEAVE PREMISES UNOCCUPIED WITHOUT LOCKING ALL DOORS, EXTINGUISHING LIGHTS AND TURNING OFF WATER OUTLETS. E. INSTALL OR OPERATE VENDING MACHINES OF ANY KIN) • ITHOUT CONSENT OF LESSOR. F. USE PREMISES FUR LODGING ROOMS, GAMBLING OR ANY IMMORAL PURPOSE. G. OPEN WINDOWS WHILE AIR-CONDITIONING SYSTEM IS OPEkATING. H. KEEP KEROSENE, BURNING FLUID AND OTHER HIGHLY INFLAMMABLE mATERIAL ON THE PREMISES WITHOUT LESSOR 'S CONSENT. I . MAKE ADJUSTMENTS TO HEATING AND AIR-CONDITIONING CONTROLS, PLUMHING 11 :07 :38 31 MAY 19R - 1(3(, PAGE g APPARATUS, ELECTRICL FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT, WINDOWS AND DOORS,. (NOTIFY LESSOR IF ADJUSTMENTS ARE REQUIRED OR DESIRED)) . J. INSTALL ANY ANCHORAGE, SUPPORTING OR BRACING DEVICES INTO FLOOR, WALL PARTITIONS OR CEILINGS. (NOTIFY LESSOR IF ANY SUCH DEVISES ARE DESIRED) . K. BLOCK OR OBSTRUCT ANY ENTRANCES OR EXITS, INCLUDING FIRE EXITS. (d) THE POSSESSION. SELLING OR CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES OR ILLEGAL DRUGS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED ON THE LEASED PROPERTY, THE BUILDING OR THE GROUNDS. (9) THE LESSOR SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES DUE TO STOPPAGES OR MALFUNCTIONS OF ANY SORT OF THE ELEVATORS, HEAT AND AIR-CONDITIONING SYSTEMS. PLUMBING FIXTURES AND THE ELECTRICAL POWER ANO LIGHTING SYSTEM. (10) THE LESSOR RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MAKE SUCH OTHER ANO FURTHER REASONABLE RULES AND REGULATIONS AS IN ITS JUDGEMENT IT MAY FROM TIf+E . TO TIME DEEM NECESSARY FOR THE SAFETY, CARE AND CLEANLINESS OF THE PREMISES. AND FOR THE PRESERVATION OF GOOD ORDER THEREIN. ( 11 ) THE LESSOR RESERVES THE RIGHT TO DESIGNATE THE TIME WHEN AND METHOD BY WHICH FREIGHT, FURNITURE, SAFES, GOODS, MERCHANDISE AND OTHER ARTICLES MAY BE BROUGHT INTO OR TAKEN FROM THE BUILDING AND THE LEASED PREMISES. REPAIRS, PAINTING, MATERIAL MOVING AND OTHER SIMILAR WORK THAT MAY BE DONE TO THE LEASED PREMISES BY OR FUR TENANT SHALL BE PERFORMED BY. ANY WORKMEN EMPLOYED, DESIGNATED OR APPROVED BY THE LESSOR. ( 12) THE LESSOR RESERVES THE RIGHT AT ALL TIMES TO EXCLUDE BOOTBLACKS, NEWSBOYS, (LOITERERS) VENDORS, SOLICITORS AND PEDDLERS FROM THE BUILDING, AND TO REQUIRE REGISTRATIONS, SATISFACTORY IDENTIFICATION AND CREDENTIALS FROM ALL PERSONS SEEKING ACCESS TO ANY PART OF THE BUILDING, AT TIMES OTHER THAN DURING ORDINARY BUSINESS HOURS. THE LESSOR WILL EXCERCISE ITS BEST JUDGEMENT IN THE EXECUTION OF SUCH CONTROL BUT SHALL NOT BE HELD LIABLE FOR THE GRANTING; OR REFUSAL OF SUCH ACCESS. ( 13) THE LESSOR RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REGULATE AND CONTROL ALL PARKING LOTS AND DRIVEWAYS INCLUDING ASSIGNMENT OF PARKING AREAS, AND INSTITUTING TRAFFIC PATTERNS. 11 :07:40 31 MAY 1983 ��r`ar.� �t{rt�:r>.1inr► �,,.• L{{'iEi�ir.r; � . " 77$ RIGGSBIT" INSURANCE A0I:14 Y I14C. f)q y fir+!.';- )if-.' q .' (ey.6(l L 7n — + if IMA–SHORO S1 RF;S . Uk st 001114-F.UnR lu +7C'• r LO ly{ Wit � CIA 1 �l� � toI'ISRfri1(1,IIORIII CAROIL1A llNl - 'I�IFr1if1fIF lH9 III lrlri .17 J�ra rr„l.r.. _ !j,ly tpr<,ly .S SIr 1 T c• ! 1. .. .. -'11)OP - +s. .ff ails r. I= t 1 � � 1 � ..._ ...,)}lrY��r�tlrt ��•✓ [�rll_.{,r-r.{ '1?rl• r man.— I Cr�mrn 'r? �• J2u• 1 .�tl:;.lr{ �11.,f, �. �'1.fi 1, '►all. , {-;r_[rr.nhnei �lr. ,�. ri�i.iti�fn 7?11• r • co�r�tr, .,lAix �� rS 1► IA7 ��` t`,:I,lrnl '-Y!.►irn!�.r{.rC�l '1.E nf� 7?Il , CT.!'10 sy•,'I� (' I1 C_`:•,l� ; ',��„ '1:11 •.r I u,tr.l E �' r ►``� I '[, ' V S X.x•13 r,1 � ti 11111• , �yA,.— -{'{[� rnmmnrt r (1o�11S o}•fi/ -- (.nl i I!r}. . sr!!. � f30 Af f--� !� -- ]] Ff'i• r 8R. fit• f4, ct; Z,¢ ar,l, r.<il — /jCrrC�nlrOrl �r+lr.I fij »t0so 7,1 tUrF A(>r r76'rF 1Av$f, •rd .rt in'a � ,,;rl • , 4 .at,r, ,f.� Cpl' S' ►+.(. �n,.{ Cnr!'.. ' I in • , If1 I!ntarRnA rflt s'�,E1. --- —1----- .__ —_ •\_—�-- --•`r-__.�-'_ 1 'irl r —'--- iN•-r. M-41 g- r/rr±a rfrll I,rCr�rla' r !!j/YI. RfElr.ld 1L119d8 111W 110 31. tIa<YI ��E� `�1n�1�+"! P►!J ►r tors Ir11SN• . ?1D7, rx0J! 6, I•l I Y +r t•= ---- _ r — . L✓: I r rl'i11• r - - �fi'� �t-- � qr !� r►1- t..trnart (4,111 sy Fr) r t ,11ti11• , t 1 map - -- — — .1 f .1!eil• r ` * �Ia{'nl�+.l E rll5tl � AI, ...L �9It 1� � ,, ias93_ ff r1T• .�(.,l>r_' r77'i• a Oy , ! ..:�!�,.'l_L ,� r j► �► ' �1 rat I r 4 r , ^ rIr II KE ap FO27UR �-3 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS b Action Agendffa ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Item No. F, 1$ Meeting Date: JUNE 17, 1986 SUBJECT: JOB TRAINING PARTNERSHIP ACT CONSORTIUM AGREEMENT DEPARTMENT: COUNTY MANAGER 4 PUBLIC HEARING: Yes X No ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: MANAGER'S OFFICE, X501 AGREEMENTS TELEPHONE NUMBER: Hillsborough -- 732-8181 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 Mebane - 227-2031 Durham -- 688-7331 PURPOSE: To consider renewing JTPA Central Piedmont Consortium and Pri- vate Industry Council/Chief Elected Officials Agreements. NEED: Central Piedmont Consortium and PIC/Chief Elected Officials Agreements expire June 30, 1986. The agreements, executed in 1984 established the consortium including Durham County, Orange County and the City of Durham. Earlier Board action designated Central Piedmont as the JTPA Service Delivery Area (SDA) which gives the Central Piedmont Consortium state authority to plan and operate JTPA activities. The SDA authority is supplemented by the local legal agreements. IMPACT: The terms of the agreements are two years which coincide with the state service delivery area redesignations. RECOMMENDATION(5) : Approve renewal of JTPA Central Piedmont Consortium and Private Industry Council/Chief Elected Officials Agreements through June 30, 1988. 16d NORTH CAROLINA DURHAM COUNTY AMENDMENT TO CONSORTIUM AGREEMENT This is an Amendment to an Agreement among the County of Durham (hereinafter "Durham County" ) , the County of Orange (hereinafter "Orange County" ) and the City of Durham (hereinafter "City" ) . The date of this Amendment is , 1986 . WITNESSETH : WHEREAS, Durham County, Orange County and the City entered into an Agreement on June 29 , 1984 to establish a Consortium to plan and operate a multi-jurisdictional program under the Job Training Partnership Act (hereinafter "Consortium Agreement" ) ; the Consortium Agreement is incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, Durham County, Orange County and the City have each agreed to an Amendment to the Consortium Agreement, as set forth in this instrument; NOW, THEREFORE , Durham County, Orange County and. the City agree as follows : 1 . The June 30, 1986 expiration date provided for in Section VIII of the Consortium Agreement is extended for a period of two years to and including June 30 , 1988. 2 . Except as herein amended, the Consortium Agreement shall be and remain in full force and effect. Durham County, Orange County and the City have each authorized this Amendment to Consortium Agreement to be duly executed under seal . COUNTY OF DURHAM ATTEST: By Chairman of the Board of Commissioners as Chief Clerk Elected Official COUNTY OF ORANGE ATTEST: By Chairman of the Board of Commissioners as Chief Elected Clerk Official l B t1. CITY OF DURHAM ATTEST: By City Manager for Chief Elected Official City Clerk NORTH CAROLINA DURHAM COUNTY This is to certify that on this day personally came before me , with whom I am personally acquainted, who, being by me duly sworn, says that is the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners for the County of Durham and that he, said is the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for the County of Durham, a body politic and corporate, described in and which executed the foregoing. instrument; that he knows the common seal of said County of Durham; that the seal affixed to said instrument is said common seal; that the name of the County of Durham was subscribed thereto by the said Chairman of the Board of Commissioners for the County of Durham and that the said Chairman of the Board of Commissioners for the County of Durham and said Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for the County of Durham subscribed their names thereto and said common seal was affixed, all by order of the Board of Commissioners for the County of Durham, and that said instrument is the act and deed of said County of Durham. Witness my hand and notarial seal , this the day of , 19 . Notary Public My commission expires NORTH CAROLINA ORANGE COUNTY This is to certify that on this day personally came before me , with whom I am personally acquainted , who, being by me duly sworn, says that is the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange and that he, said is the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange , a body politic and corporate, described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the common seal of said County of Orange; that the seal affixed to said instrument is said common seal; that the name of the County of Orange was subscribed thereto by the said Chairman of the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange and that the said Chairman of the Board of Commissioners for the County. of Orange and said Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange subscribed their . names thereto and said common seal was affixed, all by order of the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange, and that said instrument is the act and deed of said County of Orange. Witness my hand and notarial seal, this the day of , 19 Notary Public My commission expires NORTH CAROLINA DURHAM COUNTY This is to certify that on this day personally came before me , with whom I am personally acquainted, who being by me duly sworn, says that Orville W. Powell is the City Manager, and that she the said is the City Clerk of the City of Durham, the municipal corporation named within and which executed the foregoing instrument; that she knows the common seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said instrument is said common seal; that the name of the corporation was subscribed thereto by the said City Manager and that the said City Manager and said City Clerk subscribed their names thereto and said common seal was affixed, all by order of the City Council of the City of Durham and that said instrument is the act and deed of said corporation. Witness my hand and notarial seal, this the day of , 19 Notary Public My commission expires NORTH CAROLINA AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PRIVATE INDUSTRY I.. DURHAM COUNTY COUNCIL/CHIEF ELECTED OFFICIALS This is an Amendment to an Agreement between the Central Piedmont Employment and Training Private Industry Council (hereinafter "Council") and the Chief Elected Officials (or authorized signatory officials) as authorized representatives of the County of Durham, County of Orange and City of Durham (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Chief Elected Officers") . The date of this Amendment is 1986 . WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on June 29 , 1984, the Council and Chief Elected Officials entered into an Agreement pertaining to, among other things, the development and implementation of a job training plan pursuant to the Job Training Partnership Act (hereinafter "Agreement"); the Agreement is incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, the Council and Chief Elected Officials have each agreed to an Amendment to Agreement, as set forth in this instrument; NOW, THEREFORE , the Council and Chief Elected Officials agree as follows : 1 . The June 30 , 1986 expiration date provided for in Section VI of the Agreement is hereby extended for a period of two years to and including June 30 , 1988 . 2. Except as herein amended, the Agreement shall be and remain in full force and effect. CENTRAL PIEDMONT EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL By Witness Chairman COUNTY OF DURHAM ATTEST: By Chairman of the Board of Commissioners as Chief Clerk Elected Official COUNTY OF ORANGE ATTEST: By Chairman of the Board of Commissioners as Chief Elected Clerk Official CITY OF DURHAM ATTEST: By City Manager for Chief Elected Official City Clerk NORTH CAROLINA DURHAM COUNTY I , , Notary Public in and for the above named County and State do hereby certify that the due execution of the foregoing instrument was duly acknowledged before me by as Chairman of Central Piedmont Employment and Training Private Industry Council for the purposes therein expressed. Witness my hand and notarial seal, this the day of 19 Notary Public My commission expires NORTH CAROLINA DURHAM COUNTY This is to certify that on this day personally came before me , with whom I am personally acquainted, who, being by me duly sworn, says that is the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners for the County of Durham and that he, said is the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for the County of Durham, a body politic and corporate, described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the common seal of said County of Durham; that the seal affixed to said instrument is said common seal; that the name of the County of Durham was subscribed thereto by the said Chairman of the Board of Commissioners for 16c the County of Durham and that the said Chairman of the Board of Commissioners for the County of Durham and said Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for the County of Durham subscribed their names thereto and said common seal was affixed, all by order of the Board of Commissioners for the County of Durham, and that said instrument is the act and deed of said County of Durham. Witness my hand and notarial seal, this the day of , 19 Notary Public My commission expires NORTH CAROLINA ORANGE COUNTY This is to certify that on this day personally came before me , with whom I am personally acquainted, who, being by me duly sworn, says that is the Chairman of the, Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange and that he, said is the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange , a body politic and corporate, described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the common seal of said County of Orange; that the seal affixed to said instrument is said common seal; that the name of the County of Orange was subscribed thereto by the said Chairman of the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange and that the said Chairman of the. Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange and said Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange subscribed their names thereto and said common seal was affixed, all by order of the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange, and that said instrument is the act and deed of said County of Orange . Witness my hand and notarial seal, this the day of 19 • Notary Public My commission expires NORTH CAROLINA DURHAM COUNTY This is to certify that on this day personally came before me with whom I am personally ' 4 acquainted, who being by me duly sworn, says that Orville W. Powell is the City Manager, and that she the said is the City Clerk of the City of Durham, the municipal corporation named within and which executed the foregoing instrument; that she knows the common seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said instrument is said common seal; that the name of the corporation was subscribed thereto by the said City Manager and that the said City Manager and said City Clerk subscribed their names thereto and said common seal was affixed, all by order of the City Council of the City of Durham and that said instrument is the act and deed of said corporation. Witness my hand and notarial seal, this the day of , 19 Notary Public My commission expires • RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE . COUNTY TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING CONSORTIUM AGREEMENT WITH DURHAM COUNTY AND THE CITY OF DURHAM FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXTENDING.THE:TERMINATION'DATE.TO JUNE 30, 1988. WHEREAS, the United States Congress enacted the Job Training Partner ship Act in order to provide job training and employment opportunities for economically disadvantaged and unemployed persons; and WHEREAS, under the Act units of local governments are encouraged to form consortia to carry out employment and training services; and. WHEREAS, the Counties of Durham, and Orange and the City of Durham have formed such a Consortium; and WHEREAS, the Chairman is authorized to execute all documents on behalf of the County for Job Training Partnership Act purposes; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS: The Chairman is directed to execute an amendment to the Employment And Training Consortium Agreement for the purpose of extending the termination date to June 30, 1988. BY ORDER OF THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS THIS THE DAY OF , 1981. 1 71 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agenda ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Item No. ��9 Meeting Date: JUNE 17, 1986 SUBJECT: RECYCLING REPORT DEPARTMENT: COUNTY MANAGER PUBLIC HEARING: Yes X No ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: MANAGER'S OFFICE, X501 REPORT TELEPHONE NUMBER: Hillsborough - 732-8181 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 Mebane - 227-2031 Durham - 688-7331 PURPOSE: To receive a copy of the report from the Orange County Solid Waste Task Force. NEED: In an effort to extend the useful life of the Eubanks Landfill the Task Force has developed a proposal for what it considers to be a sustainable recycling program for Orange County, Chapel Hill, Carrboro and Hillsborough. It projects that 5, 000 to 6, 000 tons of waste--in the form of aluminum glass and newsprint--could be diverted annually by the program. IMPACT: Initial start up cost is estimated at $130,000 with $10, 000 for each year thereafter. Funding for capital is proposed to be provided from the landfill reserve whereas the on going operat- ing cost would be provided through a surcharge to the per ton tipping fee. RECOMMENDATION(S) : Refer to the Manager for staff analysis and to bring back a recommendation after conferring with the other representatives of the governing bodies which own and operate the landfill. 112 Proposal to Establish Sustainable Recycling Program for Orange County, Chapel Hill, Carrboro, and Hillsborough 19 . March 1986 Draft to Orange County Solid Waste Task Force Revised 3 April 1986 Draft adopted by Task Force 9 April 1986 Draft Finalized 20 April 1986 Submitted to. Chapel Hill, Carrboro, and Orange County 2 May 1986 Summary The Orange County Solid Waste Task Force proposes • that the County and the Towns of Chapel Hill and Carrboro establish an ongoing recycling program for the residents of the county for collection of aluminum, glass, and newsprint. In order to ' do this the governments need to establish drop-off centers at seven public sites and two apartment complexes as well as upgrade the current processing center on Airport Road to be used as a major drop-off and collection site by community groups. Additionally, extensive publicity is necessary to ensure the success of the program. The Task Force proposes. that a budget of $130,000 (attached) be . granted to capitalize the program and run it in the first year to two years. An additional managment cost of $10, 000 annually would be incurred each year thereafter. The - life • of the equipment for this first phase of a comprhensive recycicinq program is five years. Expected tonnage recylced by this program during the five years is 50(10 to 6000 tons. This program can be capitalized using the existing landfill fund surplus. Additional funding could come from a surcharge to the current $3. 00 to $5. 00 per ton tipping fee. A one dollar per ton surcharge would raise about $65, 000 annually. This could support not only recycling but a necessary comprehensive solid waste study to determine future needs and other related projects such as continued education on household hazardous and toxic wastes. Rationale Given the rapid growth of the area the existing Orange County regional landfill will close in 10 to 15 years. Some estimates are now as low as seven and a half years. Although new land has been purchased, it has not been permitted for a landfill and this process will doubtless be extremely time consuming, expensive and fraught with uncertainty. 'Man area residents have expressed concern that the 12 year old recycling program m r un by ECOS Inc, a .local non-profit corporation, is now struggling and is able to collect only 60%, of • the volume it did when fully operational . They have expressed additional concern that this community should provide its citizen 's with an opportunity to recycle to reduce solid waste, energy use and contribute to the public good. 17 FecyC ling of newspaper, glass, aluminum, and possibly other materials such as cardboard, mixed paper, and certain plastics will conserve resources, reduce pollution, and lengthen the life of the landfill if it is undertaken on a significant scale. Background Although the present recycling program was run economically and delivered recyclables for a low cost per ton it recieved limited governmental support. Other. local governments in North Carolina. notably Durham and Charlotte, have given significant support to recycling efforts in spite of the fact that these programs will not make a profit for the city. In Charlotte's case, it is hoped that recycling of residential solid waste will significantly reduce the city's waste stream and buy extra time for landfills are about to close. In Durham 's case they support energy conservation and solar projects throughout the City. In the coming FY 1986-87, Durham, working through a local non-- profit corporation, Sunshares Inc in conjunction with ECOS Inc hopes to collaborate with Orange County 's recycling efforts by sharing the capital cost of collection equipment.. Their first Year program costs include only 50% of the cost for a truck, trailer and forklift. They are anticipating that Orange County will come forward with a level of commi ttment to recycling equivalent to theirs. Durham is considering an expenditure. of $100, 000 to support recycling. They have also committed to a $60, 000 comprehensive solid waste study which. will examine all aspects of the future of solid waste disposal . This is also something which Orange County and its municipalities need to consider while we still have the. luxury of a ten year lead time. Nationwide there is no residential recycling program that makes a . profit. Some curbside pickup programs have over 70% participation rates but they are still subsidized by local and state government. If we wish to have a sustainable area wide recycling program, public funds will be required to initiate it and to subsidize its ongoing operation. It will also require support from community based groups. The Animal Protection Society has stated that they would sponsor and publicize recycling programs. The Sierra Club has also indicated a willingness to be involved in promotion of recycling in Orange County. With a strong, visible program, other groups will emerge to work on sponsorship of recylcing, especially if, as -was the case in Durham and Wake Counties, they can recieve some benefits from their sponsorship. 1 d Operational Economics In addition to the capital costs of establishing the recycling program, a subsidy of $10, 000 annually will be required for the . program to be maintained, properly capitalized and eventually expand to include curbside recycling and buyback centers. The total cost,of $130, 000 initially plus the $10, 000 per year, when . . annualized over five years, will amount to approximately a $16.00 per ton subsidy for recycling efforts. f.. The $130, 000 capitalization cost can be spread over two years if it is projected that it will take that long to get the program fully operational . The sale of the recycled materials should offset day-to-day costs of running a recycling operation. The costs of establishing and managing the program need to be borne publicly. The •cost proposal enclosed has been generated by the recycling subcommittee of the Orange County Solid Waste Task Force. It will enable a qualified organization (s) to establish a comprehensive recycling program throughout Orange County which will be able to collect and sell initially about p0 to . 100 tons per month of aluminum, glass, and newsprint. This is about 2% of the total waste stream generated in Orange County. Management Any publicly funded recycling program which is run by a private organization, as we are proposing, will require a management structure which enables accountability to both the governments funding the program and to the organization running it. In addition, the coordination of equipment purchase and use with Durham needs to be worked out. The managemnt of the proposed recylcing effort is a complex issue • but the details can be worked out as part of the development of the overall work plan and bid package. Future Directions This is the start to a much more comprehensive approach to an alternative to landfill of the majority of solid waste. Future programs could include curbside collection of recyclables and production of a saleable Refuse Derived Fuel . The collections of r•ecyclables proposed in . this initial project do not include UNC, private collectors, or construction waste. • • • 17c UNC has a tremendous opportunity to reduce its waste volume if it builds a refuse derived fuel facility to densify and combust the largest fraction of its waste at the existing power plant. This plant is to be renovated in the next five years. Currently the possibility of using pDF, even from University wastes alone, is not being considered. Conclusion We hope that the elected officials of this county will take the initiative to support a successful recycling effort. We are all aware that recycling by itself can provide a solution to only 20% a-f our waste problem but it is important to begin action now to avoid a crisis in the next ten years when our current landfill is filled. There are three possible means to funding recycling: 1 .General revenues from each municipality and the county; 2. Funds from the landfill fund surplus to capitalize the program initially; and 3. A surcharge on the tipping fee now charged at the landfill to sustain the program in the future. This surcharge would generate $65, 000 per year. This would sustain the program and could also fund other projects such as a comprehensive solid waste management study. Over five years, this level of surcharge could not only cover the estimated capital costs of this proposed first phase of recycling effort but also sustain future expansion to curbside pickup. ' -� x � °j t PROPOSED TIMETABLE FOR SOLID WASTE RECYCLING IN ORANGE COUNTY MONTH TASK JUNE JULY AUG S[9 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN 1. APPROVE PROGRAM o ' ----' ---- 2. DEVELOP * RFP �� -- 3. ADVERTISE * KFP 4. REVIEW * PROPOSALS 5. SELECT * PROPOSER - _-_ 6. REDEVELOP Incl. site signs, begin publicity campaign _ * [%T'G SITES 7. REINSTITUTE COLLECTION 8. SELECT ADDT'L * PUB & PRlV SITES Y. MAJOR PUBLICITY * EFFORT 10. DEV NEW SITES 11. INSTITUTE COLLECTION * 12. ADDITIONAL - ---- PUBLICITY ' ' , 13. FINE TUNING of COLLECTION & SITE DEVELOPMENT ____ 0C01TF 11 June 1986) 1 • ?udget for Recycling Program for Orange County, Chapel Hill, Carrboro and Hillsborough .tem Cost Remarks 'lathed Truck, Trailer $25,000 Assumes new equip. shared c Forklift with Durham. ?rocessing Center $25,000 Pave existing site :upgrade of existing Construct holding bins for glass & papers :enter at Chapel Hill Erect covered shed 'ublic Works Office) Can be Used for Civic Org. ievelopment of $9,780 Includes screening, landscaping & curbcuts pilot sites at at each site. Assume special use permit apt. complexes may be required at some sites Chapel Hill, Carrboro, Hillsborough redevelopment of $7,600 Reestablish sites in Chapel Hill,.Carrboro & :xisitng Public Sites Hillsborough. Establish New site in Hillsborough . 1 Development of and S. of Chapel Hill (Culbreth JHS?) Two Additional Sites Includes screening, etc. Publicity & Advertising $11,000 Site signs at 15 sites = $3400 (incl newspaper,door hangers, Newspaper Publicity lx/wk for 1 yr.= 5000 site signs and slide presentation) Door Hangers 2x/ year all residences = 2200 Professional Slide Presentation = $600 - Project Management $30,000 Necessary to success of project. (Full time, one year) Includes development of all sites, Management of all construction • Management of publicity, legal & admin work Misc.: Intl legal fees, $10,260 Assumes need for special use permits at . apartment sites site design Negotiation w/ property owners insurance Liability Insurance, Professional design assistance at selected sites Subtotal $118,640 _ Contingency @ 10 $11,360 TOTAL $130,000 1 '7c ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agenda ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Item No. Gif _ Meeting Date: JUNE 17, 1986 SUBJECT: SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT--EVACUATION DEPARTMENT: COUNTY MANAGER PUBLIC HEARING: Yes X No ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: MANAGER'S OFFICE, X501 TELEPHONE NUMBER: Hillsborough - 732-8181 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 Mebane - 227-2031 Durham - 688-7331 PURPOSE: To consider adopting resolutions pertaining to Carolina Power and Light Company Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant. NEED: The Northern Orange branch of the Coalition for Alternatives to Shearon Harris (CASH) has requested an appearance before the Board to present resolutions. Representatives from Carolina Power and Light Company would like to address the Board in regards to the Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant. IMPACT: RECOMMENDATION(S) : 1. ORANGE COUNTY Action Agenda. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Item Na. y5 ACTION AGED ITEM! ABSTRACT MEETING DATE June 17, 1986 ' Subject: Disclosure by County Officials Department: BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Public Hearing: Yes X no Attachments: Information Contact: Norman Walker Guilford County Disclosure Act Phone Numbers: 732-8181, 968-1501, 227-0231 PURPOSE: To present for consideration a disclosure policy for elected and appointed officials. NE D: A policy that will provide for complete disclosure of real property holdings in Orange County and ownership interests in firms doing business with Orange County. Board members should be required to disqualify themselves for voting on any matter involving any ownership interest. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the same disclosure policy for Orange County as Guilford County has enacted and request the North Carolina State Legislature to enact this policy for members of the Orange County Board of Commissioners. � � ' t-� -•-.1":"•- s.:' .-is, :'-:„._,:..7:::::1,-.,..� ----Z._- -- - �A-....-..`ai�' _ qtr '.;'•_,2-,...i..7.-,7;41-.==_'=c -_fF x`. .H t r.-..7...5.--7...:..-.,:-.•- : -- 1 .•: %" - r i--F; -:e-y p� - ...-7,:_f,-..._;:-;-,,,,,;...„:,-.:_ �]' w: •_.-~F f i.ry� - l �GK*- • :�Y._.... r mil:y -...: .�}�^.~: ..- • f '41 W.C.-.7Z:"..,;-...4-'.7: - - - - r,.:1:7-.. _ _ _ . :.r. rt A_"L- -i� tr _ .. • ' Tr? `, y- -q i - %� - :: - � Y._,- . l•-•1F ,--'.' am _ l_ ._� _ _ �C•��L .`-rut _ _ - � ;_ - _=�-n-r . c�z:s 7=::. • ti -=.m .:�� - �x� .�?:• :� tea:-+:�.. ce,=�+^_r.._1 <.f.-...-L-Y::r:-r- «t':ti'r - .. ; � }='' _ � _r. _ - -z_ __- '�i f -. •: h{' = - _�:v-" � =•+i.:' - . om • r� '_1 S .y 1 - .'- 'ti•- - - -_ - i�"=:i_3.. �•;� ^4+°-='r•at'`;=>sr "r_��`'1;a_r7;�.=Y_e.� .be.r _ y. :.ate t. - . z _ ._ 'TNT. - - - _ -/-- - .t.`• �•-�t�._ - -.�=• _ • .,,x-.,w 5,t1,'w..-, .:e,: - - - -dam 8 � .. _ --1 Y'' -` Session Laws--1973 CHAPTER 296 j -1 I1 :and covered by tide 7 l r H. B. 696 CHAPTER 296 tea. Ater this section are AN ACT TO REQUIRE THE DISCLOS('RE l)F PRC)PERTI INTERESTS • ` .tie t the private AND ASSETS BY GUILFORD COUNTY OFFICIALS. - . •• The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts: .;'.^"-, • -r State Agencies and .. - •• s fi4 melt and e m powered -•.} - Section 1. Every. member or' the Board of Commi_ioners of Guilford 1 .; •• I ,-_ County shall within thirty(30)days after the effective date of thisact or within . let- -_ J%UT any other State '` . ---1.1- '::'' • thirty(30)days after assuming office disclose any legal,equitable or beneficial z t nrcipality,county,or • -=_- -. i .: ='; rater at he or his spouse may have in any real property in Guilford County = admini tration,and - _ . . which is in the toning. water and sewer jurisdiction of the Board of County ' - .::' . - Cotnmiritioners of Guilford County. - 3=p- - ?-nforce Act. The :: _. r_.: clget and request fag _: 'Phis disclosure shall be filed in writing with the Clerk of Superior Court - ":;y and shall include all real property which any Commission member holds title to, 3. e..- be sufficient to give ..'4':. ate funds to the individually or jointly,any real property held in trust as well as any pecuniary •0-Wed and the proper - mtere t he may have in any business. firm or corporation of whatever nature, x '_i' y.a ,_ which lioltls tide to.tu has any ownership interest in any real property within k.e.; e`.-.," the zoning, water and sewer jurisdiction of the Board of Commissioners of - _- ' '`' or any other person . .< .►aced against in any _ _ Guilford County. . ethnic origin, or �. 2. Every member of the Board of Commissioners of Guilford County ' t shall disclose any legal,equitable or beneficial ownership interest he may have - is. .; .stun reported to or in any business,firm,or corporation.of whatever nature,which is doing business - - •` ' with Guilford County pursuant to contracts whidt have been awarded by the i r- Jr trlfrc nlatw s in - -. Board of.County Commissioners. t which cx"'t"iria or i Sec. 3. Every member of the Board of County Comm iseioners of Guilford j ;dentint, ELF,provided - at this a:t or when it County shall disclose any legal, equitable or beneficial ownership interest. he ctrl: proceeding the may have in any business, firm. or corporation, of whatever nature, which ie: ''" + attempting to-secure the award of a bid from the County.prior to the award of n i orders L. may be - A - any contract, by r ., i Sec. 4. The acquisition by any member subject to this art of any legal. • -t; ir_titir Federal-State i equitable or beneficial interest in real property within the zoning_ water and WiA g. sewer jurisdiction of the Board of Commissioner of Guilford County shall he .provided in the.act • il'= If Libor sot:aliprnva! disehr,ed within thirty 00) day% after the acquisition of same_ Any legal. .,yf any- ..ti- with other federal equitable or beneficial ownership interest which any member has in any- - '_ business.firm or corporation,of whatever nature.with whom Guilford County t ! safety and health 1• is now doing busirw . shall he disclosed within thirty (30) clays after the _ tr of North Carolina ! effective date of this act or within thirty f301•days after acquisition of the W n act shall receive a ownership interest. Y_ the t ha\ryers of the ( Sec. 5. Every Board member who has an ownership interest required to `be disclosed by this act shall di ualit hirnulf (ruin voting on :111Y naiter _ :. of this act or the c+. to Le. invalid, such involving any web ownership interest which n-'cni •s for official eel inn Is-lore the ee Board of County Commissioners of Guilford County. ? of the act which can i and to this end the l Sec. 6. Any member who violates any provision of this act shall be guilty _4r i of a misdemeanor and may be fined not more than one thousand dollars -_ ($1.00(1) or imprisoned not more than one year. or both. Any number who is fl'-',,_;.- 1973.with respect to i convicted of a violation of any provision of this act shall forfeit his elected or sent and:xatinE s and appointed office.and such office shall he considered vacant as of the date of the •:.-i.ions. and their t ' ' final judgment of convict ion_ :e, Sec. 7. Tins art shall twcc'tnc•effrc I R c++n January 1. 10'4. `i ed. this 11;4. 1st day of In the General Assembly read three times and ratifit-cl, thin the 1st clay of .'K, Mar 19' 3 r 327 zq ,N !� Mf taw t7:�'-- r a *c:• a � a.y. r ..ws �e !r �_..g, s�ar>,X7 . .: ,y yam - w MeJ,,_•=•-'r f•- 11.1 y;� '` `. + _-- : i �k'' �7: _y.'%:. ..;y�. •1 :-V, .4v .. ' n? f r7• � �`v a .:.7 Yt ti.x.• S. J . ir{-:'-'.f3i, -•-mat`., .� 'tr.-7.,,}..>.':' `y v _y_ `*z�_:=.7` _..�7. _.:s �, ._ tt*:'e.\S'"-. .} c.; i �- ' �•,,ti= t V_I-i,� --' ` : ;re`s,+. .:.+- .i_•.; T'G t � .. ••• '"• -"''.: �. -•} �:,; •_ •',si. Z10,-, �,-.r�:' _ •u.. 'irC =::,��t '�~ .. iT''..FC.s Y'a^,-: ��• ,ic �. %- :r .• ' ..=i?. - .1i-'M.,;-r9�..`--..�.)`.�;�; : .reel.,',r ri..�•t y3-, a __ xr� - '�q,.)...--• .,q W' ..�l.¢• c�. 'S^>..�,.t'--•Q:..r�...;i:; ::ii. s,� .i"r?r. �r_.' �.,.:`�' •• -ei may`' _ �cg "r.�d- <%�' er _- �+ 3s, t,� :.fit+••. f+..d_}°r M �^'�" :r{ .e..>"_ •7; :'-Y' lb.. � ..._ iF .w. �_.e6 ,.• P4. w 3- _7,,Avo t r i'- ' ,, r t;. r e-g,ktl x' a ':�`'.r.:_._`w!i:.:.3r'^'' t .—` 11^,•J3• t k.'.- 1. .ti...!•.. :$ifi„ wsr {,b.. x--•ya?.r.s' a:e. y�wr..�•. _ -�y..�,�`, :n?r•'.t,,�•-�.',.1 *rat.+:•, r„n �ki7 :=C-'iiy'.�;e\ �..: Z�.tY•x.a; -i�, tu. ,y ��y �t t^ •?1,;' • -r . ;lx 1y ' ...f,:•:. r Y;.: .� ,�'.1;4 ?-e'S�a f"ti Y rC?•'- .-t%r :s' -' ,• .`.ti: 4. i"?! 'a".`r'eF'Y?.l3>b,y":.' - e's a^Tv��! 't-4:d s F:: e+�; "5.: ,'.x. ,.!r1r:'R,� ••3,.�'i`.. i` t'i. a 4.4,..3.f!,,.�. :�?-s f�'FT._ •O 0` 7 t`•?.`.::� �.wa .t",` `�, a e. �7 Y.. i,.. .. .. _ . ._ .. .. ., -�:.>.;� ti't .a..�•�:.._n.:.� ,...-.-..`�' rr-i .•-t.ri.!,:�-.r;.k4.d[�:�:sc'i'tm.�:'1xTi�2i�'�ff.:C�`isL����.•���S�.A�•�•ar���"v` ��a.�.6iii��. 'u ORANGE COUNTY 18i BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agenda ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Item No. G41 Meeting Date: JUNE 17, 1986 SUBJECT: GOVERNOR'S GOOD ROADS PROGRAM PROPOSAL DEPARTMENT: COUNTY MANAGER PUBLIC HEARING: Yes X No ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: MANAGER'S OFFICE, X501 TELEPHONE NUMBER: Hillsborough - 732-8181 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 Mebane - 227-2031 Durham - 688-7331 PURPOSE: Transportation Board member W. B. Buchanan has asked for a resolution supporting the program which the Governor and the Bi Partisan Transportation Task Force has put forward. Key provi- sions include: 1. An $85 million one-time General Fund transfer to provide initial funding for the new Transportation Trust Fund ($70 million) and supplemental funding for the Powell Bill and Secondary Roads Programs ($7.5 million added to each for a total FY 86-87 allocation of more than $56 million) . 2. A 2 and 3/4 cents per gallon motor fuel tax increase. 3 . DOT cost savings of $31 million. 4. Increased use of private contractors to perform maintenance and other economies. NEED: IMPACT: RECOMMENDATION(S) : As the Board decides. d SW�4 18 .,,�4�- STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P.O. BOX 178 GRAHAM 27253 JAMES E. HARRINGTON SECRETARY W. B.BUCHANAN BOARD MEMBER June 4, 1986 Mr. Don Wilhoit 304 Lexington Road Chapel Hill NC 27514 Dear Mr. Wilhoit: It is now critical that I hear from you and your distinguished members on your support for Governor Martin ' s "Good Roads Program" . I have asked for a resolution supporting workable program that the Governor, yoanse rtati and the Bi -Partisant Transportation Task eForceohasroffeeredation I sincerely need to hear from you within the next few days. Please, poll hopefully Governor Martinuand ethe rHighway oProgram thatlwilluhelptmeoto help p• Sincerely, W. B. Buchanan , '- �, WBBJ r!c j I`. Gi AN OVERVIEW: • • 18` The "Roads to the Future". plan recognizes that North Carolina has urgent needs which must be addressed by.the Highway Fund, and it recognizes that a combination approach offers the best solution. The Transportation Trust Fund proposed under the plan is worthy of special • note. The highway account of the Trust Fund would be sustained by the dedication of seven percent of the Highway Fund. ($57.3 million in FY 87-88, $61.9 million by FY 91-92). Smaller revenue amounts from existing tax sources for aviation, rail and public transportation would be dedicated into separate accounts for those programs. The highway account would provide funds for local governments through a no-interest loon program and would be used to balance highway spending by highway divisions on a per capita basis. The Transportation Trust Fund would be brought to bear in a number of ways and its structure and operation are detailed separately. y Because of the urgency of the highway funding problem, the governor's. proposal recommends immediate action. For FY 86-87 an $85 million one-time initial funding for the new Transportation General Fund transfer would provide init Trust Fund ($70 million and supplementarfunding.for both the Powell Bill and Secondary Roads Programs ($7.5 million added to each for a total FY 86-87 allocation of more than $56 million). ` 2 3/4 cents per gallon motor fuel lax increase (bringing 4 , the state tax to 15¢/gal.) and a two-year staggered registration plan for automobiles, motorcycles and light trucks would take effect early in the fiscal year. The tax increase and staggered registration ($40 every two years for license plates instead . of $20 per year) would produce more than $90 million during the year which begins July 1, 1986. Additionally, DOT cost savings totaling more than $21 million during FY 86-87, part of the governor's proposals, would further enhance the buying power of the Highway Fund. In FY 87-88 and subsequent years, there would be no General Fund transfer to the Highway Fund. However, the strength of the highway program would be enhanced by transferring funding responsibility for the Highway Patrol and the Drivers Education Prorgram to the General Fund. These transfers would initially permit an additinnal j9?_5 million to be dedicated to road work, and that amount would grow over time because of reducing the inflationary impacts in the cost of the patrol and driver education. At the same time the transfers take effect, the funding formula for the Powell Bill and Secondary Roads Programs would be changed. Presently, 1 3/8 cents per gallon of the motor fuel tax is dedicated to each program. The "Roads to the - Future" proposal would dedicate seven percent of the Highway Fund to each program, and an increase in funding for both would result. (Under the current law, $49.7 million would be dedicated to each program in FY 87-88, the governor's formula would dedicate $57.3 to each. Furthermore, because the seven percent plan includes growing fee revenues from drivers licenses and vehicle registration, it would show a greater increase over time). DOT cost savings and internal efficiencies will also continue to grow, reaching more than $42 million annually for FY 91-92. The savings will result from the increased use of private contractors to perform certain maintenance and operational functions, better utilization of equipment, asphalt recycling, and a personnel reclassification plan which will make more use of part-time state e mployees. Overall, the "Roads to the Future" proposal would generate additional buying power totaling about $200 million per year. Approximately half of that annual total would be available for right-of-way acquisition and new construction projects, the other half would be used to match federal funds, increase resurfacing, improving maintenance and continuing small urban and safety programs. t (PLEASE ADD TO THE JUNE 17, 1986 AGENDA PACKET .FOR ITEM G6 - Governor's Highway-Program Proposal.) • 18q ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agenda ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Item No. 0-7 Meeting Date: JUNE 17, 1986 SUBJECT: ALERT CABLE REQUEST FOR EXPANSION OF FRANCHISE SERVICE AREA DEPARTMENT: COUNTY MANAGER PUBLIC HEARING: Yes X No ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: MANAGER'S OFFICE, X501 TELEPHONE NUMBER: Hillsborough - 732-8181 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 Mebane - 227-2031 Durham - 688-7331 PURPOSE: To receive a presentation from Alert Cable TV of North Carolina requesting amendment to its existing franchise. NEED: Alert Cable TV franchise agreement with the County limits expan- sion beyond the number of homes that were connected to its system in November, 1980. Alert Cable TV desires the opportu- nity to serve more County residents through elimination of restrictions placed on its franchise agreement. IMPACT: Currently the County has a franchise agreement with Village Cable, Inc. which encompasses the majority of the County. Village franchise agreement does not preclude the board from receiving an expanded service area request from Alert Cable TV. RECOMMENDATION(S) : Re-establish the Cable Television Citizen Advisory Committee to review the Alert Cable TV service area expansion request and to draft specific standards by which an amendment may be considered by the Board. Alert Cable TV of North Carolina, Inc, P.o. BOX 309 • CARRBORO,N.C.27510 • (919)967-7068 1o4 ALERT CABLE TV OF NORTH CAROL INA, INC. REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT TO CABLE TV FRANCHISE Alert Cable TV of North Carolina, Inc. (Alert) currently operates in Orange County under a very restrictive franchise - which permits it to serve only those homes which were connected to Alert's system on November 24, 1980. Alert requests that its franchise be amended to remove this restriction, so that it may provide service generally to the citizens of Orange County. Alert's history and its record of progressive, quality cable tv services-to 80,000 subscribers in North. Carolina more than justify this requested amendment. Alert Cable TVhoNoth Carolina, Inc. originated in n Orange CountY in 1974 of its first North Carolina cable system in Hillsborough. Alert is a subsidiary of Wometco Cable TV, Inc. Wometco Enterprises, which was originally founded in 1925 with the start of a movie theater business, entered the cable television industry in the early 1970's. Currently, Wometco Cable TV is owned by the investment firm of Kohlberg, Kravis, Roberts & Co. Milton Lewis is the President of Wometco Cable TV, Inc. , which is operated out of Miami, Florida. . Joe Surles, whose home base is in Goldsboro, North Carolina, is the Regional Vice President for North Carolina. Wometco is currently the 22nd largest multiple systems operator in the nation, serving some 177 franchised communities. Today, Alert has 80,000 subscribers in over 45 North Carolina communities served by twelve offices. This progressive, responsive growth in a twelve year period represents a significant commitment in capital expenditures. None of the franchises acquired by Alert have been sold or remain unbuilt. Four of the franchises Alert has operated for the past nine years have recently been renewed for fifteen year terms. One of these renewals is the Carrboro franchise. Alert's record demonstrates that it does not make commitments it cannot keep and that it keeps the commitments it makes. The company has responsible management and a large pool of resources to draw from. Alert offers a programming mix of primarily entertainment programming, information programming second, and third, programming which is "narrowcast" (programming of interest to CARRBORO, NC HILLSBOROUGH, NC ORANGE COUNTY 967-7068 732-6860 967-7068 Alert Cable TV of North Carolina, Inc. P.0. BOX 309 • CARRBORO,N.C.27510 • (919)967-706$ only a segment of the viewing audience) . This thinking is projected into Alert's tier structuring, where entertainment and information are provided on basic service, keeping it most affordable for the most people; Alert then adds specialty channels which appeal to fewer people on the expanded tier . and pay services to those who want them. Alert's experience in the cable tv industry has shown that educating and informing the public on the services it can provide is a most important service to cable tv consumers. As the cable industry expands the potential subscriber must have enough information to choose which options are best for him and his family. Alert utilizes several avenues to get this information to the public, including extensive use of area newspapers. a ers. The provision of sound cable tv programming and quality cable services are also vital factors .in Alert's relationships with its subscribers. Alert has been successful in this area. Without its excellent record, Alert's growth -- its subscribers have doubled in the last two years -- could not have happened. Alert strives to maintain a positive, yet conservative, approach to innovations within the cable industry. Just as utilities pass costs on to customers, the costs of cable tv innovations are borne by subscribers. Alert is sensitive to these costs, and it seeks innovations which benefit the majority of subscribers. Alert Cable TV of North Carolina, Inc. has a history of success in this state. The local office which serves Orange County has also proven to be highly motivated to serve its operating area. However, the limitations in Alert 's existing franchise deprive the company of the ability to serve Orange County's citizens more generally, and deprive many of those citizens of cable services they would otherwise receive from Alert. Alert respectfully requests that its current franchise ase be amended to end this artificial limitation. CARRBORO, NC HILLSBOROUGH, NC. ORANGE COUNTY 967-7068 732-6860 . :.::.:. 18'1 ORANGE COUNTY Action Agenda BOARD OP COMMISSIONERS Item No. 49 6 ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT MEETING DATE June 17, 1986 ' Subject: Orange County Transportation Development Plan (TDP) Update . 1986-1990 1 Department: manager's Off'e i Public Hearing: Yes X no Attachments: Information Contact: Albert Kittrell Transportation Plan Jerre$5s0 re Phone Numbers: 132-8181, 4 22T-0231 PIPPCGEs-`` To take action on the updated Transportation Development Plan (LDP) and its ridations prepared by Carter-Noble Associated, Inc. NEED:. An updated and approved TDP must be in place before any future federal/ state transportation funds for equipment and operations can be alto-- ' caged to Orange County.. The TDP will provide an overview of and implementation strategy for providing human service transportation over the next five years. A copy of the request is contained in the agenda folder. IMPACT: If approved, the revised TDP may require additional County funds to match future UMTA appl ations and will indicate an increased County involvment in the. administration of the C.A.T. Program. (See Implemen- tation Plan Section) Specifically, TDP recatmends hiring a part-time (1/2 time ) transportation gyrations Supervisor and the Department on Aging continue to serve as primary administrative manager. The Manager recommends reclassifying an existing position, utilizing County funds, in order to assign the duties of route and scheduling to one position supervisor. Presently, those duties are being done by more than one staff member. RECaMMENIDATICNS: Transportation Steering Committee recommended approval of the TOP on March 28, 1986 and the NC Department„of Transportation who funded 90% of the study, has approved the 'IDP. (See attached letter.) O R A N G E C O U N T Y BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS l 8 r ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date June 17, 198§ Action genda Item ` l SUBJECT; HOMESTEAD HIGHLANDS - PRELIMINARY PLAN DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes X No Attachment(s) Information Contact: APPLICATION EDDIE KIRK VICINITY MAP SUSAN SMITH PRELIMINARY PLAN TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN AGENCY LETTERS DRAFT 5-19-86 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill -- 968-4501 PURPOSE : To consider the Preliminary Plan for Homestead Highlands for approval . To receive the Planning Board 's recommendation. NEED: Piedmont Atlantic Inc. has requested approval of a subdivision for 47. 19 acres of land located off Homestead Road (SR 1177 ) approximately 500 feet from the intersection of Homestead Road and Rogers Road in Chapel Hill Township. The property in question is known as lot 9 of Tax Map 109 . It is owned by Mary Duncan . The purpose of the request is to permit construction of a seventy--eight (78) lot subdivision to be developed in three phases. Roads constructed to NCDOT standards and dedicated public are proposed to be constructed to serve the subdivision. All lots will be served by public water and sewer service from OWASA. The property is designated Ten and Twenty Year Transition Area and zoned Residential - II (R-2) . Rezoning of the property was approved by the Board of Commissioners on May 5, 1986 . This district permits the development of single family residential housing on minimum lot sizes of 20,000 square feet. The property is located within the Chapel Hill /Carrboro School District and the New Hope Fire District. 1 V 4 IMPACT: Approval of the request would allow development of the seventy- eight lot subdivision in three phases with lot sizes ranging from '20,000 to 39,525 square feet. A 1985 NCDOT traffic count on Homestead Road indicated it handled 2,861 trips per day.. Using 9.51 trips per day per residence, an additional 742 trips per day would be generated by the development. (SEE Traffic Impact Study for further data. ) The road system and lot layout of the subdivision was developed and agreed upon by the applicants, the Town of Carrboro Planning Director and the Orange County Planning Department in advance of formal application for preliminary plan approval . A copy of the submitted preliminary plan was forwarded to the Town of Carrboro staff for their information . The attached. letter was forwarded by the Zoning Administrator In response to the receipt of the plan . The County's response to these recommended conditions is as follows: In reference to conditi- on 01 the extension of this cul -de-sac would require a second crossing of -the stream which crosses the southern portion of the property in an east-west direction . This cul-de-sac is both unnessary and undesireable and was not a component of the agreed upon road system for the subdivision . In reference to the recommended condition #3 NCDOT standards apply to proposed public roads in the County 's jurisdiction. Road construction plans must be submitted to and approved by NCDOT for final plat approval . In reference to condition #2 Claymore Road will function as a collector road at the time other adjoining properties are developed . It will for this subdivision function as a sub-collector road and under the County Subdivision Regulations requires a 50' right-of-way. Under the County Subdivision Regulations a 70' right-of-way is required for a collector road. Given the Iiklihood that the property, when developed , will be subject to annexation the request for additional road right-of-way is reasonable. The County Subdivision Regulations, however, require that a 70' right-of way be provided for a collector road. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Board recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan with the following conditions: 1 ) designation of the southernmost boundary of the stream buffer on Lot #9 on the Final Plat 2) designate remaining acreage of original tract for "future development" 3) indicate total acreage and open space acreage 4) include notation on applicable setback dimensions and revise the front and side setbacks for corner lots to comply with the provisions of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance 5) include complete notation on plat regarding restricted use of stream buffer 6) provide dedicated 10 'x 70 ' sight easements at all street intersections 19C 7) provide a turn lane on Homestead Road as recommended by NCDOT 8) provide temporary turn-grounds within dedicated rights-of-way as required by NCDOT 9) renumber lots consecutively within phases The Planning Staff recommends the addition of condition 110 in response to the Town of Carrborols comments. 10) provide a 601 right-of-way for Claymore Road - - :.L, 19i. g1 ri:: ro�/- ,.',^ ��` • rac,,�.�': "'_ ':.V .�4..:�. � HOMESTEAD EAD ., ;.,s3A, HIGHLANDS ° , � ` `' t. -: ..� Property of . ra�1 e . 2 LUP Designation: (�r� E)41 r 9 Transition Area w 79' °" Zoning District: R-2 a i , . . _ ��_ . � . . 1" = 400'• i j -, : .-, y oes L07. ��--" . . \ INSERT , 1 / " Loa f • ,r 2 AG ''. ■ '.� .x'9222_•9C a �• z ' r I i- rte,. f , •'a''° 0 1 , ....--. --; .I 51A ., �• / �— TSL-YNO~'.p�l v 3846 F.- / 1 S� • r 23C- OA\I , '4Q' . 1 1:2•,=,., 2245AC \ r, Oil' _ _• i i.' r; rLc?r i tort UK rKINT (INK ONLY) 19A • 11/B5 • Aft ICAT ON OR_SH80IVISYON APPROVAL_ ORANGE COUNT`( OAT E: March 26, 1986 SUBDIVISION NAME: Homestead Highlands • • LOCATION: Homestead Road, Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina • OWNER/DEVELOPER: , Piedmont Atlantic, Inc. ADDRESS: _ 123 Black Cherry Lane TELEPHONE NO.: 929-0510 : • • Chapp.l Hill . N.C. • 27514 - AGENT/CONTACT: Dale E. Redfoot TELEPHONE NO. : 929-0510 President A. SUMMARY INFORMATION: Orange County Tax Map 109 Black -- Lot Is) 9 Township Chapel Hill Zoning Districtta] :ANT Total 'Number of Acres: _ phases: Two (21 -r ieerr(()-p b iota L Number of Lots: _ A Average Lot Size:- h acre Minimum Lot Size 20,000 Number/Type of Structures: (existing) None _tpraposed] 78 Linea L .Feet in Streets:- Acres• in Open Space Water SuppLy: OWASA Jublic tap ecify] X Community Individual "Wastewater Disposal: OWASA .PubLic(specify] X Community Individua.L . Schap l District: Xhiagga—aill=LALdNXD Fire District.: New Hope Genera L Land Uses in Area: Sinnle Family Dnellinas, Farms. General Store, Apartments, Schools, Pier Co. ( Critical Areas: yes stream/drainegeways No ?Load. prone areas Bolin Creek watershed(specifyl No historic sites. other(axpLain) B. ALL p Lets suet be submitted on sheet no sma L Lar than one inch equa Ls two-- hundred feet (1 "=20011 and no Larger than one inch equal's fifty feet-' -(1 "=501 ) and must contain the following information: .:-: subdlei•ien name, ,/ Hams of oener(sl banding setback Linen check items neon of surveyor, engineer or by notation or typical Loa land planner Layst! completed) › existing end proposed ease, P It1Sis1 Preliminary Plan mints (drainage, utilities, , slate, north error (North at top of map) reads. ate.) .�. dal• (inciading revision dates]� j adjoining rights-of-way _IL krz township, tax •ep-block-tot including dimensions and ✓ N Warmness street newel and scat. road boundary described with , besriegs and dist ' existing and proposed • total acreage of the tract utilities, including ' . and 'croons of Lot.. including : t e 9 end excluding area within yd ' nixes, rights-of-way .•: hydrants. valves and • .....:\l'-' •• • control earner ✓ � manholes ..' �'°' control let Lines with {,•- existing and proposed culvert . dimensions fnoLuding alzas and .grades Lot numbers .. _, typical street cross-sections :6::"f^ Lotanum lines 7�; end intareaction details . topography es tan foot (101 `�r'.•�ry•'•-'• including design and width <'i Of trerelwey end shoulders '•'}}.:+ intervals harizantel alignment and y;: . voter bodies, screams, flood- Js anerel curve data ( uatle ■ay and floodpteine '"`•5.k roaciti p stream buffers and notation `:,•'.fia'a4 .•�,y psrrenani factures such at r indicating restricted .:E: buildings, cometarlee, ;. Y develapeent patencial 44; township. corporate and extra- IL ::�?.i' historic landmarks, : :_4i territorial planning adjoining lot layout • ;;4. jurisdiction tins. which names of adjoining property =?:ti:t•.. cross the property ornare and aubdiriaiane - :,;;;: location and size of parcels dedicated for public tee or reserved ,,,L •:.}y''} in carman 'A'I'f/.er 51w+ u notation and size of lots of restricted development potential and :W'. notation on plat regsrdin ' ✓ :^'w::4 9'name - . .. ate ',gement plan- indicating provision for control of the first 1/2 Inch of runoff from tsperyidue surfaces (GRAY AREAS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) 1.9t! • OTHER SUBMITTAL .REQUIREMENTS 1 . Twenty-six (23] copies of the preliminary plat 2. Two fuLL size copies of an Orange County Tex map (one copy with tax parcels invoLved cLearLy marked] . a 3. Where municipal or OWASA sewer is not avai Lab Le, a Letter from the Orange - County HeaLth Department certifying the proposed wastewater system for.- each Lot. :, 'the appLicant, hereby certify that the foregoing appLication is compLete and accurate. I understand that a $210.00 fee (subdivisions of 15 Lots or- Less) sr a. $370,00 fee (subdivisions of 15 Lots or more] is due at the time of app li cati on . A $5.00. per Lot fee is due at the time the finaL pLat is )resented for recordation. - (12/-. /// Arr.— -- gt,t i(-21;;1--- kIMP `ANT'S: SIGNAT -3 OWNER'S SIGNATURE -- • ?/2 a/ 2.O MITE DATE • • • • • • • • FEES: Amount 11 370 Date Paid 98-gco Receipt //a08 • 11/85 HOMESTEAD HIGHLANDS 1 9 ORANGE COUNTY CERTIFICATION AND APPROVALS - PRELIMINARY PLAT STAFF ASSIGNMENT: EDDIE KIRK SKETCH PLAN: Received -4-86 Reviewed 3-4-86 PRELIMINARY PLAT: Received 3-28-86 Reviewed 4-2-86 REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT : Received 4-9-86 & 4-22-86Reviewed 5-13-86 NCDOT ; DATE 4-11-86 CERTIFICATION APPROVED WITH RECOMMENDED REVISIONS SCHOOL BOARD (Orange/Chapel Hill-Carrboro) : DATE 4-1-86Certification UTLITIES (OWASA/Hi tlsborough/Mebane/Orange Alamance/Durham) : DATE 4-15-86 Certification APPROVED OTHER: Recreation Advisory Council 4-18-86 (Date) Carrboro Fire Department (Date) Chapel Hill (Date) Carrboro 4-86 - (Date) Hillsborough (Date) Durham (Date) Other S&E OFFICER 5-8-$6 (Date) _._. (Date) PLANNING BOARD : Date 5-19-Q6 Approval Approval with Conditions r� Denial BOARD OF .COMMISSIONERS : Date Approval Approval with Conditions Denial 1 HISTORY OF HOMESTEAD HIGHLANDS SUBDIVISION Balgzeuee Aaiixi .X T1Sia_Qt_A Emaltal Z-3-86 rezoning 5-5-86 R--1 - R-2 • • 19t • TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY HOMESTEAD HIGHLANDS SUBDIVISION A.. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMEN" IN ORANGE COUNTY, N.C. FEBRUARY 24, 1986 REVISED MARCH 31,.. 1986 PROJECT NO. 52601 PREPARED FOR: • DALE REDFOOT PIEDMONT - ATLANTIC:,. INC. I'C RIVERBIRCH ROAD - DURHAM, N.C. 27704 • r - PREPARED BY: PHILIP POST AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS/PLANNERSI SURVEYORS CHAPEL HILL, N.C. - 191 1 #52601. Traffic. Inpact Report Homestead Highlands Residential Development Anolicant: Dale Redfoot,. President .Piedmont-Atlantic,- Inc.. L-C: Riverbirch. Road D.urham-,. North: Carolina 27704 Pur ose This report will. determine the affect of the Homestead Highlands Subdivision on the traffic on Homestead Road (SR 1177).. Procedure: i� Determine the road conditions a). Pavement and lane widths b.): Existing grades c) Site distances- ' d) Type of intersection e) Shoulders f) Surface conditions ti g) Alignment 2... Determine traffic factors. a) Number- of trucks b) Number of buses c)` Lane distribution d) Variation in traffic flow e) Traffic interruptions. • 3.. Determine, existing- traffic conditions 4. Traffic generation by project 5. Traffic tree fa. Conclusion _ Data: The existing road is an NCDOT road design with the standard 20 foot plus of pavement with. a- 3 to 4 foot shoulder tapered into a ditch line 5 to 6 feet from the. shoulder. The road is equally divided into. two standard lanes. The site distances fall below the critical vertical alignment factors specified. by NCDOT. The alignment and grades do not reduce the flow of traffic.. Traffic- Impact Report. 11 February 24, 1986 1 9 Page- Two Trip Generation: • According. to the Institute of Traffic Engineer's Trip Generation Report,. e single- family housing unit will produce 10 daily trip endings. This single. family subdivision has 78 uni,ta- which will. - generate approximately 7801 total average trip ends• per day. Table I provides the resulting trip ends for' this project for average. daily traffic conditions: for A.M. and P.M. peak conditions. Under full development, the subdivision will. have 390 tripe:. to. the site and 390 trips away Eros the site on a typical weekday. The- A.M. peak hour traffic will be 23 trips: to the site, and 46 trips. away from. the sites. The.P.M. peak hour traffic will be 46- trips to the- site, and 23 tripe away from the site.: Trip. generation ia• summarized in Table I below. TABLE I Trip: Generation Summary . 24-hour 7._00-9:00: A..M.. 4:00-6:00• P.n. Two-way Peak Hours Peak Hours Volume Enter Exit Enter . Exit 780 23 46- 46 23 Work Locations: The main. patterns- for individuals traveling to work loca- tions would be leaving the development and going. either right. or left on Homestead Road. Left would be work locations in Chapel Hill by way of NC 86 or the Triangle by 1-40. -Right would be to Carrboro or Hillsborough by using Old NC- 86. Site location and surrounding streets: The site is located on Homestead Road between NC 86 and Old NC 86. It is 1_3 miles frcm NC 86 and 2.5 miles from Old NC 86. Other streets in• the_ axea: are- High. School Road, Rogers. Road, and Sewall Road. • Tr.af is Impact Report February 24, 1986 Page. Three a Itn o CD- C e• nT X . �� Cr- , N W r. 5' r • = a,0..".• - o G tirt a S e.� el-.S O cD -5' tn- .ter. rCr 'CZ S Q}. M, NC • 0 Ct , 1..., r �.. rrt m (A (' et CC • 41 O` 012 tit ■.. tai m r co O CM •• at • C c. c - C. IDD el- = ch [^H [..• e+ -5 c 0 • C7 co. ICY � � �' es" co . • = • C1 O"° C — C I . C V C 0 Q c ` = r- r T a .a+ • y, -+ .... . -s n m - . -Or _ -n n " tD C) !D l • Traffic Impact Report, 2 0t February 24, 1986 Page Four • Exiatina Road Conditions: Per- the NCDOT manual "Highway Capacity",, levels of service and maximum service volumes on a two-lane highway under uninter- rupted flow condition (Normally representative of rural operational.. Flow; in- both: directions. Level of Service Description per hour Free flow 400 cars • Stable flow 900 care Stable flow= - 1400 care D Approaching unstable flow 1700 cars Unstable flow 2000 cars Forces flow widely variable. * See: Appendix A for definitions. Determination of Intersection Ca itv.ac • » The intersection- capacity analysis for use in site planning application is based on the "Critical Movement Summation" , technique developed by McInerney- and Petersen. Tables. II. gives the capacity ranges- of an. intersection for each level of service. r- TABLE it Intersection Capacity by Level of Service Level of Service Ranve of Capacity (VPH) . Low High, A z_ 0. 900 B 901 1050 C 1051 1200 0 1201 1350 1351 - 1500 F -(Special. case) 1500 • 201 • Traffic Impact Report February 24,. 1586 Page Five Surroundina Developments and Streets: Homestead Road. is an area 'that is paralleled on both sides by rural agricultural. land. with homes scattered through the: area. No ma?or- subdiviaiona. have currently been constructed along this_ road- Chapel Hill. High School and Sewall Elementary School- are the ma3or items of development. in ,this area.. Although High: School. Road and. Sewall. Road intersect with Homestead Road. the traffic impact for the High- School traffic La during a different peak hour than: residential traffic. The primary access to the High School. is Sewall. Road which connects to Estes Road-. Estee Road is the- mein. collector for Chapel Hill and Carrboro traffic with regard. to school traffic. Then spacing of the Rogers. Road.... High School Road and the exit for the subdivision are. adequatel.y spaced to provide a. smooth flow of traffic and to- not impede the flow on Homestead Road. Since the speed limit. on Homestead Road is currently 45- ailes per hour and the pavement width excedea 20 feet,. the capacity of the street will not be lowered. by the- increase of trip: endings, from the proposed Homestead Highlands. projeet. Conclusion-: Homestead Road is- a connector between NC 86 and CTd NC: 86. The: pasted speed is 45 miles. per hour. the pavement. width- is 20 feet, the- quality of vertical and horizontal alignment. is good, and the current usage rate. its low. • The adding of- this. subdjvjsj6n will. not lower the level of service for. Homestead. Road.. A stable. flow of traffic will be maintained vn° this' road with the added traffic of the.. Homestead: Highlands. project. - _ Traffic- Impact Report 2 Q February 24,. 1986. Page Six _ - I Appendix ••A" Operating Conditions for- Levels o£ Service Level of Service A: This is a` condition of free flow, accompanied by low volumes and: high speeds. Level of Service- 9: This occurs in the zone of stable flow, with operating speeds beginning to be restricted somewhat by traffic. conditions.. Level of Service C: This is. still in the zone of stable flow, but speeds and maneuverability are more closely controlled. by the higher volumes. - Level of Service D:: This. level of service approaches unstable flow, with tolerable operating speeds being maintained, though. considerably affected by changes in operating conditions. Level of Service E: This cannot be described by speed alone, but represents operations. at lower operating speeds, typically, but not always, Lit the-neighborhood .of 30 miles per hour-,, with volumes- at or near capacity of the highway. - Level of Service F: This describes- a forced-flow operation at low speeds,. where volumes are below capacity. In the extreme, both: speed and volume can drop to zero. • a •L l it II II . . -----------------------------;—•---- - rc : • Nil.'N' -, r. a I - ..'•4,. , -Al' ., .21,..t:.'.,_----;--_,.,•:-----v_.. .2 -, -...,_: i \\ .... •-k--' -11--.-1''3',,_...ii-----'-' *'''...-=.7 -2■-11- "ta SL...,. ‘-',F, ..: . ipm..... _ \ . . 7- v 2U- ... .... .L- –P.EEN0 --- 0 7 in_ i • _• co v.,2 7. 1 - J. Illillk* Er_ ■:: giE.. .- Nk; -1 6'cact - us ix,. • rr\-\.,-,44\ w . ...Tat,a i ;.. Gs =411 —"4 12 1 i ir:. I = 0 < r a V r il;my F \ gar 0 -3-=gri: _ ... 3 .1. I eftlir.--7...- 1011111111110 ../ \\ ....--- .• Cl•la-Zjii = er..12.1 la 14 111 Vilar -'t M'm.1* 1 0 .., ) ,.. *ellbmw4 I = 1 ° ;I 5 ;..... .." 1 ellt : st 141P-% ri 1 07. , (i NIII ■, \\, ir t., .41 I I . 12-*. - . i ' e • a u, li . inflit a imemi__ - . --,/ ...__. - . . ._ - g I ,Li. 1 pi‘ 4 4eer‘x - Pee _....iiil V ft . _ :Am.' Jill& - . 'ezkr .;.__ . . '-,.-- a;-4 ' opliticw, ,_.L.,:41, 8__,,....„.1.7, ..... /r- ,0 ict. ,....i",— _ mi. ti = 14 iim....• - - - PIP i i i 1 44 '"'" tIL i • r . g a jatifillr' '1,-. ,..-, . : . . ...., ! E ' tn - .-_ . -1 -II 1...6",-.4p,,.---- _- zrr -.. AI. , -•`- -- ciaillittiff_,A,V1_ItI'‘'. " s.,-,-Ta r milw .- •_-",ett,i,of - -!go_ •vitir- ullrir•Ikl egy,, - - 04 I ..1 4 II _ .. ,.. . ig --- -- ' atLit ' „ 6•_."40-7, 17t- ',.i ' -4,r-- I.", .. cii iv ...., . , 3, .7' :14 1 1\‘`. . "Iiisii2 - . . ,./ k -I -...;.. 1 -- 1 01 . ultigi ..-1-4L'..•,-_ 'C't- A Sr f:7 C • it -.. '',141grirliglitiWP.Irr7-‘k rp - a I a t. 14, t li , iE 4,141ax . i ' . I'' 1• --4.., H • . . _ ----, - - • : *. i 8.1 i !litre 41) ,2ii;... • ---._ vs-.- 0.3- lip,....-----‘,.z•m,-,,,,„ . i Eilliswill--7-,---' !7 :::.' OP u , CI c. , _ . . ___. ... C:T , 45/ •...-0--- -- l ,i. .... : ......::___. i . " illiprJr1 ,111Trv•N-IK„..-4ft . .. ., - 0- a CO 0 .0......- - im • V .. .s.-, . / 0 H 11 At#11',.' eertCA •., . ' il-Li, Ire.. . -: .,... ....._1 • ....0., inl. cp IP ' a f 01 • • . 1 , rgyncishrgrgw- , 02. / . , 4t c..) < \I c..) g ,. ..., _• .:, . . - I -, . • -....,,,, sill ----7.- • •g i - - 411 1 L•= = = = r•--- F.-- ' . r— —* •—s = --' •"..2 = • 1 • 2O STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT FOR SITE OF HOMESTEAD HIGHLANDS SUBDIVISION HOMESTEAD ROAD CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP ' ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA JANUARY 1986 PROJECT NO. 52601 PREPARED FOR MIS_ DALE REDFOOT f-C RIVERBIRCH ROAD DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27704 r. PREPARED BY: PHILIP POST AND'ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS CHAPEL HILL, NORTH CAROLINA AP- 20 PHILIP POST& ASSOCIATES, INC. : .. aoa 1Nome:S* Hitt sW$1 Engineers/Planners/Surveyors No. SHEET I 100 Eastowne Drive- Suite 208.. OF 7 - -. CHAPEL HILL,.NORTH CAROLINA 27514 CALCULATED BY 'Th G) • DATE 206fs4 . (919)92.94173. 493.2600 CHECKED EY DATE. SCALE i :i . • . ANE10C.. !_ger° - • • y - f f ' , 1 , ' y t j i � • • ..4d 1 s.,bL. �dY3d7ru G1 i y r f ri , f T i i _ mss _.1 l • i . -' : f•--ede472•":---Lkili 'h:li 2C44-14L1-491----fitiLs• !Ltil 11-4710114.0 € i I ! - - • j. - _ 1 F - 1• j - 2a .a " Fast • • � . . 1 �/ r • • • _..__._ _.'�2�Le .xsa _.T���W. _ ara. r _..- _ —... . • • _.-._...__r...-_ _.............__._...... I - xi a-Y Row. [` 'I Mai _.._.. ,_._......._._.._._L..._.... ._.... .:..._......... .trr.urn.... ;~Yea. _ • o.. • • • , • i • .. .... . .. , 2 0 t ..... PHILIP POST& ASSOCIATES, INC. 4,614K:561 14'8Niarcle - 4 6t40/ Engineers/Planners/Surveyors SHEET NO. Z OF 7 100 Eastowne Drive Suite 208 . .._. . .. . . CHAPEL HIll,„NORTH CAROLINA 27514- CALCULATED BY 1.P4103 DATE • (919)929-1171 493-2600 '" CHECKED BY DATE. ... . SCALE ' . . • - 1 • , „ • - : , - ■ 1 ! -i i i I ; ! i ! ; - i . • . . . : , - . . t1 _.4.. - ---- - 1 .:......... ,..lt _ ae i ikti _._ J 1 1 I , . _ :....._„ : : -- . . . ! , . . : jf ; : . '; : "; . : 1 •-•-•----,- _, , . Ti ; . . . . - • • . . . - , t''' r ■ • I r•• 1, / ■•., f 1 :aa ; i : : ; ; ; ; , , _ _ ____d_ ___,AC413mi44 eir l'h'. -- -1td.t. - -. } k-rogo„Lte't---ce.-.4-.t4t - ' _ _ . , ...._:_. , : i . . . . . . I 1 L i 1 ._... : 1 fDL., , i r , yiggref_____1 _ ,.---—, - : - , I : • I . •_._ , , ; r r , Hi • 1- __L__ ___2_T_L_:LgxtsEftri jvicht_' 1 ' -... : i i flili - 4 . n ! 1 ' t I ,----,----,: : ....eizor 1 ; t 1 .11' , II ■ 1 : ,..1. • _7 ..) . • 1. , I i i • ■ . . . . ■ L.j ! ,■..241Y.04; 1$.0. 2Cqe-mt. I 1 • , i 7' i - r _.- -__.-7 7 reirk. —>i - i •, i rc Cueny,,--Toir —rri. F.-c4.4..)-- : I : : - : • , . . Ii ! -,. ,------..• ; , .L..z ..t.: 1,4, :Liar.: ,...id ! ; • ! . . . . .. . -- z57_i__22,4.5 .4- . „ . . . . . ,.., --- ----ttss,- .;—'" r.P-Z-4:Z---; ; ! r i 4 .4_ _.„. , ..___,.. ' . , . , Li ...4.0t- To.tY t.o)(14.q) -'7- csi, CFS i ,..._.' — .._'. ; : : : ; , , • ! , • : r . . . . . . _ .-- ______,__...—......._ ...._ .... . .. .... ..1 ,...di Ca. ... .L .... .. ,__.._.___._C.„.e..r rem: At I C.. , sz 'ie-re/1LP A' : : . 1 -i.-__Ze...k_..L... . ...... ": - .. Z•2, .,.._' L ayg- : : 6.5 r . : ..:(14,16 _ 18049 S.F.:x...7S . .. _ . -- _ —..—Drmew4s,.... a7 atK 5.37 L0.44..."......' 15.00.,W x_74., _.._...........____.Yarct..7.7.Gros- , - • • ino. _ . Oazz5 - s _.__..:.._.......__ .tu.41,s............... .......... .?.•; .0...q.. • .. z 4 7_ „....:. -.0. .7 ...... 'SOD ES x Z0' ___. ......._. ._. •34.3 .6686 .._______ __ _............_..„...... z....„ ... .-....-- _7...............--.-_-___...„-- ........ .... _....1.0 6:7,-___ ,..„...... C.-........... —..... ....---_ __ _ _„.„„:.................._.....___....._____.... t: ' Q. = ciA t- s .. . „...... ....... ....... , 2Q' ` PHILIP POST& ASSOCIATES, INC.. JOB 4-Ior a N"•y� S- sum ws-z60! Eris/Planners/Surveyors SHEET Ho: 3- OF 7 • 100 Eastowne Drive Suite 208 CHAPEL HILL,NORTH CAROLINA 27514 CALCULATED BY TMI& DATE Z/46/114. (919) 929.1173 493.2600 . CHECKED BY DATE SCALE_ • , ` i. B 'l�Eete+ ,. i Y r► :! SS '-'q t " i. �!± t4�_C�4 � ' - ie. - Le« =_-,"are.!. i‘Sa. = 8 1 f i , • 1 : 1 • { f . . M • iiAa ngy .._.......__ OY,�,. v�7� Ar Et f 4 1 ,__...:- `80 ate _•_ _.mod ..._.____--- Q4 DO - • ; a :/6 Q' N Qod; ZZG o 4 gr -... __--__---.--_-_....-`-`------ 7 ` _ .. _..._.T I?" aer M_ ` ._.. ' l - ' _ ' w ii-6c7 20t TIME INFLOW STORAGE - HEAD OUTFLOW (MIN) . (CFS) (CF) - (FEET) (CFS) 0. 0 0.0 0..0 0.0 - 0..0 - "0. 0 - : - - -_ _ 0. 5 0..5 0.0 0.0 0, 0 • -14.7 1..0 - 1.9- 14. 7 0.0 0. 0 57..7 1.5 .. 4.. 72.3 0.2 0.2... 122-.8 • 2..0- • x•7_5.. 195..2 0..7 1.0 194.2 2 S 11.4 389..4- 1. 1 2.6 266..2 3. 0 15.3 655.6- 1.4 3. 1 384...1 3 5 . 20.9 1039. 7 1..7 3..7 - _. 515.7 . 4.0 as. 1. 1555.4 2.-1 4.2 . 655.4 _ 4..5. 31...4 229.0. 8 •_ 2..4 4. 9 796.3 5. 0 36..6 3007. 1 2. 8 5.3 938..a - • 5..5 - 41..6. - 3945_3 3..2. 5..8 1073.3 6. 0 46..1 5018.6 3. 5 6. 2. - 1136.0 6.5 50-0 62'14. 6 3.,5 6.6 . 1301...3+ 7..0 53..2 7516.4 4.;, 6. 3 1-387..5 7.5 55,.6 8903.-9 4..6 7..2 1449.3 • 8.-0•.. 57.0 : . 10353_2 ! - 4. 9 7. 5 1.484..5. 8..5 57_5 11837..7 5.2 7, 8 1491.5 9 0 57..0. 13329.2 5. 5 8. 0 1469. 8 ' + 9. 5 55..6.. 14799. 0 5. 7. 8. 2 1420. 0 10. (,i 5.. . 2 1621'3. 0 5. O. 8. 4 1343. 5 S� - 1 .. 5 50. 0 17562. 5 6. 2 8. 6 .1243. 8 x 4.. 0 46. 4. - 18.805. 7 G. 3 8. 7 _, 43. 0 19537: 4 5. 3 1026. 0 - _ - -_ 0 3.9. 8 20963. 4 4 8. 5 8. 9 9 w P._. 5 1 35. 9 2 871. . 6. 7 S 837. 9 7. '_) J.Z.. 0 .34. 2 2''2789. 5 6. 5 S. 0 754. 3 E77. 6. 4_ c , 2.O Lt.6 a5. 2 25305.5 7. 1 9.-2 5 . - . . ... _ 478.0 15.5 1.:7 - : 23. 3. 25783.5 7.2 9.3 421.4 16.0 s--- 21.6 26204. 9 7.2 9. 3 ... , zsa.9 16. 5 ' 20. 0 26573.8 7. 2 • 9.3 320.4 - 17.0 18.5 26394.2. 7.3 9-4 275.5 17.5 17.a 27169. 8 7.3 , 9. 4 234.0_ . 18.0 • t5.9 27403.. S 7.3.. 9.4 -- 195.6 18.5 14.7 27599_3 7.4 9.4 £60.0 . LS.0 13-7 27759.4 7.4 9.4 127.2 - 19.5 La.6 27886.5 7.4 9.4. 96.7 ___, 20.0 13...7 271983.3. 7.4 9..4 __ 68.6. . r 20.5 - 10.9 28051.9 7.4 9.4 -, • 42.6- 1 ai.o - 10-1 28094.5 - 7. 4 9.4 18.5 •--I 121.5 9.3 28113.0 7. 4 9. 4 I-- P6AK - -.6..• i - . _ 22.0 8.6 . 281.09.3. 7.4 9.4 -24.3- 225. . a.o 28085.0 7. 4 9•4• -43.3 az.o 7-4 2804L..7 • 7•4 9.4 • & -60.8 23.5 6.9 27980.9 7.4 9.4 - ' -77.1 I _ 24.0 5.4 27903.8 • 7.4 • 9..4 -92.0 24.5- 5.9 27811 -a ,_ 7. 4 9.4 . -105.9 • - 25. 0 5.5 27705.9 7.4 9.4 I -L18.7 25.5 5-1 27587..2 7. 4 9.4 -130. 5 . • 26.0 4.7 27456. 8 7.3- S. 4 141. 3 • ES. 5 4.3 27315.4 7.3 9. 4 -.1.51.4 _ 27. 0 4. 0 27164. 11 7. 9. 4 -160. 6 27. 5 3. 7 27003. 4 7. 3 9• 4 ,..- . -169. 1 28. D 3. 4 " ' 26834.3 7. 3 9. 3 - -78_74;:0 - _ 28. 5 3. 2 26657. 3 7. IP 29, 0 3. 0 26473. . 7. ,r, 9. 3 . vq, ....„ - . 29. 5 2. 7 2E282. 2 7• 2 13. 7' -197. 0 30. 0 ' 2. 5 2606 . 2 7, 2 9. .3 1,' -202. 6 30. 5 / a. 4 . 25882. 6 .___7.-,:" '734..0 - - --- 4 8 -..._. _ - .... .... l L'. 2�. -25 .:. - •T. _ -212..5 = 31.5:x. - - _ - -- - .. i - __ - - _ - ,z� -- .:: :2..0:.._ _ - ,_ _. . _ `25462..4 - _ _ 7 t 216..8. ar : - _ '�i ;.. ~ _ - -. , - - : - .32.0 - L.9 - - - 25245.5 7- 1-. 9:2: - -. -220.8 32. 5 - 1.,7 25024.8 7. 1 9.2 -224.4 33. 0 1.6 24800..4 7. 1 9.2 1 -227..7 33.5 1.5 . 24572.6 7.-0 9.a -230.7 - 34.0 . 1.4 24341.9 '7.0 9..2 X33..5 34.5 - 1`.�3" -, 24108.5 - T.0 9.1 - -236.0 35.0:" = ` 1.,2; 238/2-5 7.0 9.1. -238. 35.5 i-1. 23634.3 6.9 9. 1 -240.3 36.0 1..0 . 23394.0 6.9- 9. 1 -242. 1. 35.5- - 0.9h 231.51.9 6.9 9. 1. -243.7 37_.0 0.3 22908.2 6.8 9. 0 -245.2 s. 3.7. 5 0.8= 22663.0 6.a 9.0 -246.5 38:..0 0..7 . 224/6.5 - 6.8 9:4 -247.7 38.5 0..7 221.68 a 6.8, 9.0 - -248.7 -- 39.0 0..6, 21920.0 6.7 9.0 3.9..:5. -249.5. ` 0.6- 21.570..4 6.7 _ 9 _ -250.4 40.0 0..5 21420. 0 -6. 7 r 8.g r r ■ ■ I, ; •1 - :"'=., >I- = =. G•; . y.�• �: _ = = . . = -=. �;.� 2 = :- . . ... • 4 89 •at-97e ' 84.25 ', r' X10, -a.". 23-.- 89.0=• ,�.:R O ( , ! 47. l • /� 43 .\4 ya �i se./f r•aT, %, , ,.::•: w.� I i - __ : . P , :, ril5' -�. � ` f,� . f ( s e ¢ _ / / _ "l •�— •e .v -. ._. V..K. `, r�. y`r ..:-.4-'7-- ~ !r •• • :O f ► No-t . - ,,, • Cc • �w. . .v741., :: ---., - �i �, e-i -c . ..} .k�._. ' ray r i ay. .. p"i f , ` / I •1 ., t , I \--/ . e „,,,.\// . ,. ..;:,/, . . , I. Z./ .-'''.." '. . f4:12b 4.1 ,1±.±,L . . .., . ..... / / l 6� 0 , ry-.) I \ _, : , , ,i :: 0 . . -. (i1/440,4„'-. V'"' ::.. '- '' r . /. i:::::4:j try / i-r1 . , i ce` , . . , . . „----.,. , i .,,, ,,,, i , , , , , ,... ...... / .„..,_...„ • .,. ,..F. -:-.- , , , . , ...,_.-- - : \ ,. ' „,,, , i. ,.., , ,. . . _.,. I.. Dw. 4 /TIT•6-f li.A. :.. I.: :: 1 . .. .. . .. ' 1 F1Gt�A6 Mm �o.. 3 ` =Loo' ' may.Z 212. ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT HILLSBOROUGH NORTH CAROLINA 27278 b,.r_v .O w+l IL_ a rEiE% Wir� MEMORANDUM TO: Eddie Kirk, Planner II'' ``� FROM: Warren Faircloth, Erosion Control Officer SUBJECT: Homestead Highlands Stormwater Management Plan DATE: May 8, 1986 The Stormwater Management Plan for this subdivision proposes to meet the Ordinance requirements by con- structing a detention pond to control the peak rate of runoff from the subdivision to the predevelopment rate. The proposed plan could control the peak rate if implemented correctly. UJ 337 = :; - i '_ . • .... �,..���� P.O.sox ; r' 301 West Main Street s~`� Carrhoro,North Carolina 27510 arrboro NC. (919)942-8541 May 22, 1986 Ms. Susan Smith Orange County Planning Department 106 Margaret Lane Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 RE: Courtesy Subdivision Review Homestead Highlands Preliminary Plan Dear Susan: The Town of Carrboro has completed its review of the preliminary plan referenced above which was received May 20, 1986. The Town will recommend approval with the following conditions: 1) Cul-de-sac at end of Inverness Way to be eliminated with right-of-way .- extended to Southwest property line as indicated on the attached sketch. 2) Right-of-Way for Claymore Road to be increased to 60 feet. (which would be the minimum RoW requirement for future upgrading to Collector standards when property to the West is developed) 3) Pavement specification should require 2" minimum of 1-2 asphalt. If you have any questions or comments regarding any information in this letter, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Sincerely, GnGr-Cler4C14601D G. Gregory Shepard Zoning Administrator cc: Philip N. Post, P.E., Post Associates Attachment GGS/pap -- . • .---1, .. 1 il 2 .1-77,„,•„,. ,. . , . . .A4.• .',• •41;per!-- )4 . t.' ••••Pl•-• ta•Ttir.,,lia -' -A .- , • .,:.• •••,•'; ...•'it,•;?'•4;:•'D'-';'-1---4"....,- r--. ....-,..i4......;„ ..„ A.*. - ,-: .,. , - •.• . ...,,, -,i_f %,„ -;"'":Nr.i-Ki.:4?-,..3-..'0' •,•-..--...."'fi,.,,,_ -- - . , • --..-e-, , - ,i;:- ...:0,,,,...•.*.-il.f...- - - " • .,,,,. ,. - ::- le..,-,.•<?, -..-.. .,,,.. ,... :-... ,,..,. .,-,--;,3.-; 42',:). '1 . ......„‘. ,- ..;-.'..,:••••1,k0.. .,,,,.,-s -..'....,:-...x..,-.. ..... - -- P....q..t,--.F‘c'.--,,,7!. -.:'-'' '.-,...,-.' -,.;.....1.-:,_ ) ..,4. -", .,,..i.:"..,..,0,-.4,-.P ,... - ,....?-4.:-.,..,...,-,-,-, '-.- -,,■-•t=q.,-4.. 54ki..;,' .-'4": ''.7*.Y.4. ''......-', '-'7-VIL.: -:'"-'4 14.". 74.4.t•-eigtfla 1-;"=.1.SI-k"-"S`•V"-lr.„t7:;4;- ',.X4---i-;:' -.- -44.'=. -4..•''' :-. - .. .ki.".%*k.5---.1ztr ;!'.:;".'s '•'''':::".''''•-'''(377-1-•":21.':Y"--17•37?.?, .. ir. 4 ...fti+.1-. `•■g.,---2, ...,1-...6-, i.,,A-...v.tZl!'.1Z-,4-11 -,,v.'ed-':::;..`-.T-:-,IstE... ,,-;:;:T:•-Z,',;.r. itfrI.,,,.,, 41-4'ft:gc1,4,(‘Z•V' ' .1•-•w:.- •-i,;•';'f;'. .....'2,.'..„,j1.:( .7 -'5., .11.'e -,i-ir-<t; -•:-;:4ii. !•::: ':,,..1.-4`-.4.-1-4":",.:4fir:'-t%44:111- '''S.,-1 -,--i41.:*.i.?ii:: 4.--li_7!..Eq-;z.,:,* 0,.„.p:Z.1.4 ...,:-,-.4.;.44,,,, ,K_,It__.207:1i67:11.e:.• ty.,':4 ::!,,,:t..;:-.,714:.,.;;.),:k '",-- .. ,..,'.:-.4-''''-..!;:,-r-, , 'ftzt f::-..,.4...,:.:,.. w:1-7 zibr;;- 4.,g7,-1.1::k.7.-fir-le.,elt--.-.e,4. *, '-g-gr'r--,t Bil.-L,. ., -2:,4t. ..„,-,,,i 4,:e....g. . ..:-1- ' '--...,'W'TeX-t".1:S.:!'17- dT:':-Z, .1-,'`.44:.144 ,.0"-L. rz',:F..i' rx5.,.t4-1443.-,:`..„.44 ,:::,:-....--,i-.-. 3;c,.:., ...,i;- ii.:4: e-4,-c-Fq''''FF-Alitr.,;r4.7,•-.-4.T.:*9-'-f),. L.:?.."'-.1..tW•-i Vii 1;104P-e,ilf tiy.3-4,,..ti,••••A? .4•43..,.. t,'...•4„,t,,?..72!,-....7.-... .,,-,-;;;4.--;.:,..,,,..,...,..-,,, ,,,,,,.:,: ,73-.._44y.,4•;•,.:. ,:?,-,,t-i..:.7.....,, .1::"Z.Et. -,*. ., 4.0.77:!.. ,.,,,,,-...44r..„0: :1".7.1:1,.--,. ,O,f. ;.".. ,ifr...,... AL Cf# 7 i)ift‘,. ..7p.,:;.4'.4f,11:741*...:-:''...1/4:14c'';'9'z w,...t g 5 o.54.,,,,=r-.---- :r. --,ii,,, 77:„.„,,,,,-.-fAi .c.gliP;. c._,.. 4.-t-Pild.rt- -- .:.-.,.,,,i•eli-P:-:--; t:,t-,c-:•.-- e■EL' al- '',..' ,---*' 4iXt „..,. .... . .*....,a,..;,..,...;,,...,-.5, .,.;,ti..c. .- ..,,..,, .,.. -.;•-1/21...= :::,-.,f,--i s, ...,,..--,,,,. .. . .i- -,-.,- .. ..,.. ..., -fr.:. ,--,....,......! t.,...--',...., - 4-t -- • ....: ,4 12 ,..t.•-, ..--‘..-3..X...1._,•.;.::;.^:r.??.. .S.41,. ".••C' ,P,i.0,;,,;0....A7-.40....t-ir:NS "-P.,:*'-. -.-''.. ii,..f.314:,:,• f. ' ',,R.,S" TAN:, • .1' ,•• ja7•7-, -" .1S• . • ..4,-• :15..4 -- iv; 'f , i ji,:e.,, •.••r4•• ----:,t• .-•..-,, ,..._-,..; .,..,0;.'.1•., ....".•:.. i.,•"`., __ af- -. f1= N'17;a:F..2.Vit,..%.:1 •=41".,.- -':1- ji!..i:"'• +: , ii4t4.4;41' 1,-,,,ArIetl. rt.;'k. -..F-.-;4';' ,..._..a. 0E;'. 447:71'•'1V4 ...;.,J-.. :i.LAII 'Zt".4 ::'' •■•44•113' 7-:;y Z7l'i•fr•-1/ '-' ''.'...-It:47'.:.!.e 41.4'1' ? ,•-• -•:"1: • ... :. :"'4' .. 1 -." litl-S.'--• ."-''''''':&' --.-.-0_','P.-:§.- ,.4.3 . ,•=',,---ii:: -.:*Pfi- rati--, ,, .i..:T-I,..-1: ,,..-x,c.:-, -., ,-..;. .„,.,--..i - •.;.-ig,i,70..twi.P3,S74-,4-5: 5.--ri ,1,--i ,,,,,.. ..• 1'75,...,7'.i.:..34CCI`J--.. -11 :0N I.F.Y.iiO!.-.f. ;1.;:.; :-cic,e.:1;;",:i 44 " 14; '-- (-,.. ,...i-1-,-:v_: ,V-P:i'. • ,.,„ . ... •A...,r;Wt.-, .1,1 ....r.'T. ,:- ...-,..i..v .- --, i' ''., .1•,7'n-e.%,'"'• -1,.vi:41„,._701.5it4*,, '.:111;7414.ti,:..ez,.1-TAT: ,!:•%--,,4.6. it.4-:,f.,.02--.-O.. ,. ., - 7: ,1, Z4v-kl: ,.,,;,f7.:i''''! ,..,‘..,,., -4- '-'1.. ktF, :,:'•-4,-., ;.t, . A-.' N„.,,,._:. - .:....7- ,, -,,,,',.;.-i-T.„ ;t.i..j,- .... 94 _.,-mpisi--,17,-4-. ..5•04,itt..r.i.:. ftic4' Z4.eStli0:1:5-r4:4`4%-& ."'il'f':''' v tAt l'..W 4' -'..- 'ii:;...:-/=:: ..54:.--..:',.„.,:4;.'":"-,,;tr-T 8,- 1-4 ';!-- '4.-:$.t ...,,, *,-. : -j- .,t-h‘4, ......40:N., :--...,: - --...5.,--:....-.-11,4 L-,...4-,Ir....k. 1- . .- .,,... . , . :.4-., ,:.:-.4.4, 'if4,0:-.7.;:+._,..z.r...4.-4.. ..:. .-- ,„, ---- k-36 '-,..:17,."Aft„:,.i..:•:-.,w--,...,..-,..41- : .. '-'-v..!(-40t,:..:-E -.4,---4:rsk-, .4.• .•• , -..- p4 ...* ,-.,,, s, ,-.O.,:,.., . --as.,..•=sse.. •-. • -..73,14....01 ..,..*,....A. .... -,-e...6...:.... :,•-•Y,40... . v `A's-Z;,•i';'. ,,,,c,.,-,,,--. ..-,--,-- ..,....,'•,--,:r .d.,,. •:i.:,;,-=. . . ...1.7, --.1--e,-.11.:4'.- ... 1, ..:7' -&.A.04' ::' T- ' t:47- , :- '`.--* "1- 14,4. 4.4 ..... ,-.vt-t • 1-:, i .'4.7-,P • ...,•.' '-:,4W 2-I-Zi. '-tr.- ' • ...i• " t v-,, . ..:--: ._. -/4-01,_1..!":•-: 7,.414.--:, , ' , .4,0 .- ill...*-v- Oix .-,-,- --`,.;•=a4,......-. s--: ; -t-- . - :. f;;.1:-. Apo ,„ ..14t. :, :-..-i*--rv..-i-, -,-,- ...- - • :....z.'::-,-: .--.: -'' -...,-.. „-A-ht...ts.-. -4: ',... .. _,-...- ':--.... ---4.',., .-,,-, .',' •. iwi • -...;Te7c,', :., --,.,':--•.-..-. 1,,,,q . ,i, ,-tort-,'k-:-----_,,4_, 4 :iigt,. fi'P'..,'-,.. "- ----",:i,,7,-- s'-';: -'!*.,c.',7--,;-- - ‘2t.8 ,•., •- ,..f i-,' 01...--4;,---N-It-o_..!;:i--, i fi .4 1.;;. ' \`ilt7.04:6---4-% :c# ''''''--.:t::::::;7*-- '4:454": ..--:-.-, ',.-.- -, efrr, _.. :1-f:le"-:;4-;!;.&-VT 4%-,74 '1.:,:.• 1 . ., R.-... -0-1:-,-.k. ,r ., . ..i..,--- .p.%,!"` .4- :,...7. •-!:". ::': -..7=.?•••.. 1 ..--Ii,=1: .,•••••••Pg....--i= !:••••:.''''''-Z. •,.....AMI . -7-,-,-1,..._...,„_-,,,,. 7....., - .11..-, icax,.7-4.:14-.eli: ..-..,.::.,,! ...,,1,4.4-,,,,,?4,7.,,,v,t;‘,.- --v.i,- . 17,,,,- ..,,,..., , ," ,..,!':.e: :t%,`-.,,..,,-•-•.-• ..;- ....Y.11-4,-1-7%7611.4.4 il, - '.,7.. -e---,,- - , .. • -•04. . - ,..." . _ - .,,. . -, . -,,. _r,...•.- . kt... - 3 1...- ,..-.., .v.pr •• , . -7'.•••ti +. k4.• A;• .- 144...._2T--;WI-C.44-'''' '. ' •..tg..14reL. '.5154.0'a :.1:7•••;"` TA".:,^;"?.... iffriall .."•:.'"- $•-g" • z..•.•." -..t.;;:i.- AO '..2•`.2;-') ,..: •-,f,-1.,..7..:-t"..1'..:,.ri..t .... - ,., F.1k.:e...,,; • 4 r-.0*-:;:i',••• -1,,..f.-;:ireS.V.. .,a_*-de"' Pi !der?:;:-"--•..- - V.*:: '.': : ,:. ,',.7,-.?"-, -: '=-.:3.7'..:::.......'4q.A., , ..,',4;....:•.:3-:.- --c.:::i .,.,:if 4:- -4re,.910.- 1 .ill.„„_ . ..„/,,,.i..;.,...Irl.4, :: -:'''-' •..1". A•50-54.-:,z1 .V.j. &U-.-).;- '.!5.-''',-; -:--• -' .-'-' :304".- li4• ' ''l Ilipr,,,.. - -•..-: 4;;A."-: :-,,,F.T; . •- ,i-4- A -1, '''.--1.14.f. "44'.- itS • . .;--IV ,-•';7-1,.q-1.,...- ' -.,. 1--i !•;,... •_:."Xt "• "): 7,141ft;..u.. ,ar•-• ..,.,,I. ,..„.....,,..4. ..t....,k, , , 1,,_41-1t7q.f titt:, ,.'''•;7.-ji.r.e.A''''ZI.O.‘e-1..,•-::::•"--• ;„,,te--'..." k-i:-!.;. ''-'...:.:'....'i'..1,1!7- 7 ''''''-' -1,,`: s,..' -'-': '' '1 4,1., .-.:-.:,..-;-•, -.. ..- ,, 4 - is...;-':,-:.7 -:: • - '•:1:4 ---.,,,.- - d',• .....i.t.%-'-, . ,-;; "--i:*-;..- •■•,.. °',7-N tterK 1:4.1ktilitl. _,`:',...„,,e-,V; -"'-'''.?;:!,-"_:-..:.:Z.;,' ;11 ti:-._:, :.:-,0 . -:..,..,+7,'1, ''.. , 7i.E.1:12..1.-,: : -,•.4' ,icir!',..:c.,:i?-;,,!.:.;,. -"•'.4.44t1,45 ,'•;021k?"4.' tepp ,i-54: -!•,...0,1:%• ;.),..:74:.Jil:e17-,..4:• ;;;: -.---:.:...,,y.-1.,., zo..-a- -:=:, -,.: ,-:-- .- ,.;,...."...r..;..; ‘. • , 411-..7. -, _,-s,p1),',:t.,4,-;--4 .:-.- 'il..--r,.- f..rit:',-es.., ' -t•- .1-,i--.-S.:' ili6'14, ::•t!,,-,V 1:‘,....V■1.-$„;;F: .:,s,-::?.:,,.‘-;,.„., ' -•: • .,,;;;yr• . •I•:,:.- " - --- 't4i -‘if .°, %.■Itt"ir .....;le!'r‘r #. ,t'r. •." "7:'•'''..•.:.:':.•. ,-....-11-4- 4.-Vra, • k.,-,e- ,... -..- k- " ,'-'''-----.• ' y.... .. .:-: ,-7 - , z,.-4. -- .. • ..., Pr 'fp .yi;.-3..A.5-4.4.-:,:t...-,!1.:t'-... 39 310-5' . . %•'. .:- 1, ' . ' - • . .:x...;, .,:.- ,...z .....,. ,--; -'4.---'7;:''''' A- : .r,", , 4''. - -••.!:•'. . ;.' ' ' -'e-''' :./ ti.i'. .'''Pk.• &"''' 114 I . .. :,,:,-,k'ft? '.•••••-• .-, . . '6.!..7..0. ;:-.,..:.-.: .),,-'.-•-. - s., _Ir.,e..-4-,''':,',.--■,,,."• -Q1--*-• 1'.-,...,1"- • •;r1"..i;.t:-"•• •v. '..r 3.:• , ••--; ..r.:#,11:,.;, --4-e 1 i ..„ ..... , . ..• ...1 ...,....,: ...:• z.' Ta."-,..:,..11,.„-,,,.,.:.',=.,-: 5,4''' •....0,:,rii...-. :1--0,7=--;',"....‘a._co' .... •:.. 1,'*•.?...?''..,'.- - ::''',4--i. IA'it `,4..-- ''. . 800t;5:k;•_ArQ-'.4.4.!/..: '--.t r ' ,... e a 'g„f.}:::31;t4. ..“. .- -- . . - -*,T--;'.- ''-:?;',-1:7-4i.•':'.7 - ''/:'-'•--, ,- •':1..7iit:V'k-''." . • ''''. 7.f.7 :''7"..''.7, -.7-'.-1 "7.1...r.;''t.eltr. 4 .:1- we if.A.. ..- . ... - -•,':.,,,---..-,,.:_ ,,,..7 . . , .:= ,-_ .,.-.-.. ..,:,-1,.....;-.: „,...,-:.,,..: :,--,.,--,- ...ii--,,,4,-.: ._.-...,.e-..7%- :.-• :-.,-.... t 77,s''' r'■' _, - ,...k:_-:-i.-;-,--,:i: .f.. 4/V- -;:)---C rxiit - - '- .- •• .1. " .:L;' , ''.' ilip,,. •:-...... ....-'''"' f'../r■grA;5''.••.,'''' " ".1 '..,..:-..,',;:". C'',.,. ..'i;,71- ..6.■ ..,--. ' -.1.-1,' "'''.,.,- ,--''' I1s-14P,114Z,,::$1."r7,,.-•:.',s,.-,.a. •,,., ,s 7- - '.• , - .:•.:*i.:-. -•:•::::;...:,:l.i;'.C1..7:":..;:,3';;:.,,L';'.; -'.4.• :' 7.'-'.6%; ''.. •■•• . '.144 :''' ...'''-'' . :i•-"- 1. • s. -4%, _: .1.,c,..1411' 3...tel.is'r.,-7.T., : , • , .... .:, .-..r..ft,•„ ,1-4,...-- .. ., . , , .. , ILe:,:--1.- N.-. -(, -.:":•• ,,,,,7...e.- ,;', .k7'.7:?,,,„W-4',-:'" --•-.1--.-: ,',-- ', •:••••••• -: ' ---''''. .. - '-771-4-'..77::- -''4-'.i.,:!.3.-A--:-:---,s, . ..--•;',...-- !: ".-r.---.;':-•:: '7:: --').::::-.:----.-- --..• ,'3 , ;-- . -.;,.. ,,•::: ....":"i; ..k.it;i•;•...•- •..,'' f.;-•.'-:`!-• ''''. .';-.7'.',.-- •'-':-::: .. . ' 0'-,. •: -.-- --;;!..!..'•(:-?..•;;',.;:- -,,':t..r.'.-2.•::: 4?- •:= ''...` ' -'• --,7",:jA ,-"* .:r 1:-k;:!`i•-`:*:'..,-:'T• •' .. 1 .• '':'.--: ''•=t".- ---ztc-'4-',-,„, ,......."1.4. ' ,, : ' '''':-.',". -.,-. .'"-:',.:::.,..1!: ';'-'..--.1"z.- ----.:.-.. '7.'4:-4:•,..'...!''''...1.* 4.15:- .:t-''' 1:, "-', - .;.,V4•=trf_ ,,'• :v.ailt,e--,::„,.-11"-7:-, 7..4:',:ity,V,...,.-•.tf;.:e.-_,':•.; r...•-... ..-,:,-,,-..,"..' ,',.•:•- '..---,i';'•-•.•!Ciof.,4-i-6.N ' ' -'4,414./E: A_ --•-•::.-:""?..--A-•:,- J':': ':-.•',,-2::'' ''....1.,..:ItZ!'-ei-.-1 ,f.'--jit 1. l'7. -'" - ' -. "_-)'--i7:47:': '-'-'r-•,:k,'-';`-: I - ..:- .. -.'..,'.;.-.----:: ,-; -'- ?...".•-,:..-!".!'''. -1,-44-4,-, 1.-,--a- - s',.:. ..;,-..:,,c),L.,-....-: ,, :74. • '..:‘',.7-1;A't•Tig-tf--;::-.-:-is'; -.-.••''''""--.7'-',Z:.- ''.•;.'''''''''.-'=•:ii)'-4'''''--*''''''''.--'---i''-i5,,p• ' &-.14 SE"A..."... --""----,.:'-•.-- s,:: ,C;:.17.,;,.1,,,.:33.; 3p-- ---... - .: . .....„.: :6_ ..,..,---,---,....-..,.,-,.,v. •.-,.•-•:,-,,.-!,.L, .-.,..--7,:: , ' ,,,..7,-: ::, .'7.- 7 :-.•7:-..-1.q.i,-;771;',.;'■ i:Vt, -5: , - _-:s.''''''.:'1::....--....'; .ot•1,-. -4tev.i le-0,••?,-.,,,.•'. -,:.•.. ••.'-,,•'..,, `L--!,-4-';--','-'if.,'":-'.-4.a'--3 -ara.'-...:--,. a• 'sa',.• .,•' ■= -a" ' •.' '71;....:6i.q,-, at'' 4.. Os ' S. • s :_..-:....*...-rs■-_- .. 4..':3-,..3 ..--..,,,.-.,.- f- ,,,:-._: '7 r --.. -..,:3„. g.-.4.4...0.1.ey..,:.:i:,...1..,.-.r,,,,,,:.;,..!';',:.:'...,.* -'-..."..'.."-.:.tr.:•,!--_:.--...:%e:•-•.:o..71- .•--.:7:,'.,---_-,:.:-. '-"."-.„: ,3.•'•.--.:_- •\,, .,,,•::- : , _ ; _•., ..: 7_T--s,:7'..7,3:pc:'''tka-4, •_,'t'''..-: -.%.,'-'.:!_-.ZZ .5.,50,4P.;.;,..,-- 5i. 11)41, - -- .,...- --,.....z.:',1•0'••:-.•::::•--4,?--A-:•,t••7::5-,-....1:-.,:••••••••l'--.. -.• ..- -..,-: .-,11.f:::-Y.,--,...-.• '-•- ' •:-It-. ...:‘ . - .'","' ;.:irr-- , -.:- i‘......;,. .."•*,.,1-'. 13,..--.- 1•=t",•'''. ,;:rifli.V.;•?.',:.:-.4-i"7:•;••:::''•-•:".-:',.:-....!---"A.m.: - a"ki4:-..'...• --':„,.,..5.3z,;.:.-- ;=.. .:,'-::-..".=:;:.-,;::•,..;,i':;..-.; '', ';-:s ',.:.:.. .Posi, - , ,,--,-.'--1'7-,.,,, .. ": -"., : •-• -,-'% -----:;'-1-..s. ...,..4.,..',:;;51-u--,-* •-1.;-,47.-.:•'! ':=,:i'2.-:.:-.".'. :-•.;, _i;14714.piv,:g0wi'v-: ...,-:-:, :.;.,,-.,:, :,,4,, y:7-,,:::......:c-:?,-.'•;:;.-. 7.'Ll,"•.;-,--._.:,1-1.,-F7 N, , .,.,-,-;:, ci 1 ital -.1-,,•;?:.2:-..-,-.! . .•.- -- . - - 12 '.''',.,-.•', '.':,' --::.:.-!'e";.,...S.'•'. ‘,....,- .;:.-r'z Wi'..OS.';':' . :... . 11,fr•i' 'S.: '''. ;...ii--i-',:-t"-';•!:-;;L•,.:.'-.:,,. . ''=•:.,,,!1•41 •.,: ' -.._ :.. -- ..:-. 4,-,,...30,.. ',-„,.. . .••:.: 0.-,•'•'. ':?•. ...-Iti•-•.'•SWf10:1 .S-,.. ,2-,''. , •,,;:•", ...:-:";;-:•-■-•-•,'72.;.-.'..,‘ .--. !,'.,7_::%-.77-.7L:‘`..-.''''':'`. ;::`-;11...1.'-i::: :-..if:-.";''..- . 1114. ,:--.7.-3 . 'd`-j'_. - - .,,,,•-'••'0, - ... ,- -...-,. -..- ., ,•- ••• -1 - 7, „.' '.4.-1 4."-:-.ITY 10,TAtrli.. •- . ,' .. .1,_: . - .•.. Lite' 4 4141 . ;.--, . .: .,.., :4•„,%,:,-',...=6-r:...-t,,% ,..,..-•2IR. - -'ci`i.-.f.:;.-::--7:-;•.,•-i:.- --- - - - .-:-.--- -.•-,•• --,:!:.,- - 6, --- \e-r--14T-H )-.',,,,.,,-,7'1,1-:'-;-':?:•:.Z.4:14,716;.1?-31'ilaAe- 1-,,,rii-c-.•:. 07. ''ir•---1••:.:•Te;;;„3..... :-,:.:ET,..,-,,..-.-.11....-.........,-;,..!.-..7::,.,..-,.".•..,....:,-I..,.•._.C.',,k- ,,,,,A,,,-,: F.'.-;-;,.4---5..F , .'''•• :,'',.'-.','..-' -•, . .,. •.;;.'..,.',.-.-':,‘-:::,-,•''.'':'--,-"'-‘'..-i-T1',1:.•`i .'''..-AL'1".-",;-'...-•,:t.fX''-'t'i4.-'''''-'7:-.. , '•--3- "''''''' "'--i ,-.:-,.,::,?-;.:-....._.-.-:-!....,...:-.....':--'1!-...-",-......,,,CIL)1,■.10.E!-'.- prir'•'..t.,:.'.'4';',.'"'•,2,---tiLi 64.41- •,, •,- •:::--___;ji:-.•,-;-':: :'tif/s",•::...c,:4',:'' :.:.."..',;:'''-. 1'4.'-'te'-I'-...-s -:.'•--',.-.'.;f'-.a-:....:'::-..'-:,•,-•:••C.::.-:-:,';!"_•':--,:':.',;..4:'--T.:--.I:,'.2::-.,...•.-..- :.-,:_7.-..,T'..-..._'.::::..:-...;...,:..:_-.a.‘..,"•.,7..,:-,-.,"e.:.,.',.•.',,_:..;4.-.'-....-.'z.-..•4.•..••;:_,•.-'.;'!,•'-,'--:',t,;..'.,-.':.':..?-.':,-:4.-.-,'-:r'''.'.'.''..-,.;-.■..:',-...•,':-"-',..:--''_., V i 7.e.,•'9-1 e'.eit1. twZ'e'.,,n::.:'' 0 F..',-i!i:.,:'_-.`:.--.:..:.'.•:'-:,--..,:-.•,-:-.-,.'7;.‘,"..-....-.'-.:r'j'-'--'•^::;:,..'.::,.:"7-.':•:-,.-'-;..'.:'z',-.-n:.',:!,."..e......".-•:'.!',-i:'-..-'..:...,:.-1'...-..:,-:..-2.":(,:,:."--:-,.:,.--:,:':;--;,!.7..--.:.1,-'6,-i"--.'•;..-"--1 s-.7::.::"•.--.-!-.,-"•:4i-;'.7.",,:;1."1..-:"!r:-;'."S...,,--:.:,.c;',-'•,'3f:,1..;'■.',f't-.'.-e'.4-.,':-.,',,•,",.:.i,.t.:..t,.'';-4 s4'.-1.''%,:1.---Y14:;..•.::-_;.-=,.,,1:.1--,,:i",_m-,40,,.:,.%.k P..,!`4-:;,-..e.•.c.•(.i..Ze,:4:-,.-r,:.W:.i.t-,e:.r1-4t..,!4.1,et.'-...,.1Z..-,.,4„-"-.,.t4r-..•-..•'..'s',,;.'..- .....-.,•._--..-....---1"...:-.7-,....,'--,.,--,.,.-,'.-.,--,::':•'-.-.-,.-'':;.g-^..-7.z,7_..--.,)_,'-...i,-i'_-"'S.',.',.--_-.:..z',-.f-,.-,`-,,`.,.T,..r.- 40 14( A4 16o- `,i:f-,,6*:_'4.?„t.•e";.-1,="c-v9'.4„r7i^A:,z(,1*:7e.i,:;1,-.V:5.,:..z,1 4,,t..1,,.•,-..1-,.7!--".?:..-',7 ..' -r4 I. ,. •,,,,., _, . , •••- - , ...• .._-.-. . ".- 3..;.--. _.-•z.• •":-.': .=• ., :, ---.:': :•:.'-:.2.--:.:., .: :,.1.-..-i:,•:;':..::.x.:.•3 :•"...-.:Z.-:...,.•.,..'.,.:.• 4..-.;•;::.-. • '-!:,-..:--.;-7.11%;•.'..7:;.4,:-::;;•".•',-•'. ' .• 1" _ . :,q . .....-. ,_...„‘_3-.-4....:..i .,-,•".,''.,:',;.--!-.---c•-;tc-+-", .., .. . . . -...- ' ..._..„-, , _ .. . ,,..,,.... , -• •.. . . ...:, :,--. .i'.'... .1. ...,,,,.; ' :. -,.. • -.:.:' .- '%.:'....- -,_,,r4t7,-. ' ".:7:4:.:-...,'•.!''-Orf-:i: ---' - - .••.... , .. ,'-:.- • .: , •''1, -....',-..1 ,,:•-, .• .. ...'.. . • • . ' ' . . ' - -- ..:.. ' • • ...:'' ".:6^•••';':'-' ''!."`4`' -• Z-,''.'T-'.'",.rYTIC•fliN":S.-"P':•'...::t . • " "•••• • .......•..•-`.i..:':7'-.'i'''''----.'4"- .'-''..7'''-1....2'-::*--' -..-!''4!i'^-:-.."•.• ." '.: • •' • ..,.'', is . ,7':::(.4..:...:...''1:7'..'.'.......: .1.'.......'.L ....;..r..':-.%;:,,.,-:-.'_. `::!•!-'.4., - ..-_:: .-,....7 ..... . -■:,.r1.7.--.- ' ' ."- t." .•.', .-$:- ,‘ ...f::-*4 - -;•:••,..-t•-:-/P..-,..-_,T,-• -..1---- -,-....:::7•;;;-:. '--,.:,. ' . .. - _?- . .=. ...-7,_.,.. _- , - -.., •-, --zi...1...j ..- --; . .,..-;.......:. , . ,_ --!.',..-. , 1---=' -.. . :::;,t.',":-..-„.:.---,• '. , -.:,--.-z-,'---*:-.: -=`. .- - • , „.. 2 i. . � ..., d m:4 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Greensboro, NC 27429-0278 April 3, 1986 JAMES G.MARTIN GOVERNOR DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS JAMES E. HARRINGTON SECRETARY Mr. Eddie Kirk Orange County Planning Department Hillsborough, NC 27278 Dear Mr . Kirk: This is in reference to preliminary utility and drainage plans for the proposed "Homestead Highlands" development located on Homestead Rd. , SR1777, west of, Rogers Road, SR1729, in Orange County. Attached is a report sent to your Ms. Susan Smith on February 6, 1986 reviewing location access, etc . These plans you have sent for review concern utility and drainage. They are being forwarded to Mr . Joe Haynes of our Hillsborough office . Mr. Haynes will provide a report relative to drainage and utilities. If we can be of any further help please advise. Sincerely, AO / W. Watkins DIVISION ENGINEER JWW/DBK/cb atta . cc: Mr . Joe Haynes Mr . D. B. Kelly An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 21t STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JAMES G. MARTIN Crze = 'c 27:1-227.7 ,. GOVERNOR JAMES E. HARRINGTON DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS SECRETARY Ms. Susan Smith, Planner Orange. County Platninc 7epartment Hills ,orouc:a, 2727" Dear .;5. Smith: This is in reference to the proposed Homestead Highland Development . on Homestead "cad (SR 1777): is d?si r` tCd as a major t??oro ch7 the j �, a ar._ �r e 1� C;-aoel Hill . arrhoro Thoroughfare Plan. An SO' symmetrical ri gnt of way is recommended for future mul ti l ani ng. One entrance is recommended to the 11evel,:omeat. The entrance should be located no closer than 5,,.n' cY,•)m Rogers Road Road (r, 1729). Exact location of ?cuss should be in. � � sa a c;n from "ocers Road and s i cht distance require- ments looking south along Homesteaa goad, a left turn lane on Homestead Road at access is recommended. If we can be of any further help, please advise. Sincerely, J. W. Watkins • DIVISION ENGINEER - J:!W/DOK/gm cc: - f. D. S. Kelly An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer Ya0 r, a 1 Ali .-_ STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JAMES G.MARTIN Graham, NC 27253-0766 GOVERNOR April 11, 1986 DIVISION OF.HIGHWAYS JAMES E.HARRINGTON SECRETARY Orange County Mr. Marvin Collins Orange County Planning Department 106 East Margaret Lane Hillsborough, NC 27278 Subject: Preliminary Plan for Homestead Highlands Subdivision Off SR 1777, Homestead Road Dear Mr. Collins: We have reviewed the preliminary plan for the above development and offer the following comments: 1.. A 10' x 70' sight triangle at all street intersections. The property lines should follow this sight distance line. 2.. Construct a temporary turn-around on both ends of street "D". This will be shown as recorded right-of-way on the final plat with a note that it is to be removed once the street is extended. 3. Construct streets with eight (8) inches compacted ABC stone and one and one-half (14) inches 1-2 asphalt. 4. Right-of-way line on plat should be drawn to cul-de-sac standard. 5. Final approval of the vertical alignment and drainage facilities will be a part of the construction plan. If there are any questions, please advise. Yours very truly, JMM/JBH:jbh . M. Mills CC: Mr. Philip Post DISTRICT ENGINEER An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer /---- Orange Water and Sewer Authority Road 21 C I OWASA l P.O406. Box Jonas 366 Ferry Carrboro, NC 27510 (919) 968-4421 April 15, 1986 Mr. Eddie Kirk Planner Orange County Hillsborough, NC 27278 Dear Mr. Kirk: SUBJECT: HOMESTEAD HEIGHTS A review of the preliminary water and sewer drawings for the above referenced project has been completed by this office. Based upon this review, the following items require attention in development of the construction drawings: 1. A 12" gravity sewer must be extended along Bolin Creek to this property. 2. A 12" water line must be extended along Homestead Road from its intersection with Seawell School Road. 3. All dead end water lines must end with a blow off assembly. 4. All water line intersections must be fully valved. 5. Requirements for fire flow demands should be determined. 6. All off site easements must be acquired prior to plan approval. 7. Detailed construction plans showing plan & profile views of the water and sewer lines must be submitted for approval by OWASA and the appropriate State regulatory agencies. 8. Water and sewer lines must be installed within a public right of way or a 30' easement dedicated to OWASA. Further comments will be provided at the time detailed construction drawings are submitted for approval. Should you have further questions regarding the utility system serving this project please do not hesitate to call this office. With best regards, John W. Greene . Chief Engineer so An Equal Opportunity Employer L.range Qtn untg �.tcreattnn anb iJark li 72 it+ C epurtment � 300 West Tryon Street U�'u Vim _ HILLSBOROUGH, N.C. 27278 L.lf2.�E lrl lt. Mary Anne Black, Director MEMORANDUM TO: Eddie Kirk, Planner Department of Planning FROM: Mary Anne Black DATE: April 18, 1986 RE: Courtesy Review Comments BOMESTEAD HIGHLANDS Please be aware of my previous comments on this proposed subdivision submitted to Susan Smith on March 4, 1986. The 100' stream buffer appears adequate, but preliminary plan does not show the extension of the southern-most portion of this buffer into the shoct/narrow strip between the Kosnikowski property and the 20' gas line easement. MEL-0AK ESTATES -- Phase 2 Should the branch of Neville Creek (which flows into University Lake) not be bordered with a stream buffer? Thank you for the opportunity to make these staff comments. I will present these comments to the Orange County Recreation and Parks Advisory Council at their May meeting and will inform you of any changes/comments they may have. STURBRIDGE VILLAGE — Phase II Denoted stream buffer seems adequate. ST. MARY'S NORTH I see no elements on the preliminary plan which warrent comment from a recreation and parks perspective. MAB/pbl CC: Lorraine Parker, Chair, Recreation & Parks Advisory Council Brian E. Cox, Southern District Supervisor Robert A. Jones, Northern District Supervisor Hillsborough, 732-9361 • Durham, 688-7333 • Chapel Hill, 968-4501 • Mebane, 227-2032 Area Code 919 DRAFT PB MINUTES 5-19-86 2E PAGE 9 Yuhasz noted that this problem had arisen before and he felt the right-of-way should be reserved, but not dedicated or paved at the time of the subdivision. Smith responded that NCDOT will not accept an unconstructed dedicated right-of-way. She noted that the County Attorney is going to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners that they accept these public dedications without maintenance responsibilities. There 1s case law that supports this action so that the County could accept the public dedication of a reserved right-of-way and not get into the issue of whether DOT will sign off on the plat. Smith noted that it is a common planning practice to require the construction of a public road across the frontage of the owner doing the subdivision so that the next person then subsequently extends it across their lot. Jacobs noted that the applicant has no objection to dedication of the right-of-way. Jacobs asked about Recreation and Parks comments about the stream. Smith responded this was a drainage swale not a stream as verified on the USGS maps. Shanklin recommended an amendment to the motion to delete the reference to Nancy Williams Lands and insert lots 18 and 19. Smith recommended that this condition be left as is and a condition added stating "that the cul -de-sac be pulled back to serve lots 18 and 19 with a dedicated right-of-way extended from that cul -de-sac to the edge of the property." MOTION: Shanklin moved to amend the motion as recommended by Smith adding condition #7. Seconded by Walters. VOTE: 6 in favor. 4 opposed (Kizer, Best, Kramer, Hubbard) . VOTE ON MAIN MOTION: 7 in favor. 3 opposed (Kizer, Best, Kramer -- all due to the feeling that it should be paved due to development pressures) . AGENDA ITEM #7f: HOMESTEAD HIGHLANDS - PRELIMINARY PLAN Presentation by Smith. The purpose of this agenda item is to consider approval of the Preliminary Plan for Homestead Highlands . Piedmont Atlantic inc. has requested approval of a subdivision for 47. 19 acres of land located off Homestead Road (SR 1177) approximately 500 feet from the intersection of Homestead Road and Rogers Road in Chapel Hill Township. The property in question is known as lot 9 221 DRAFT PB MINUTES 5-19-86 PAGE 10 of Tax Map 109. It is owned by Mary Duncan. The purpose of the request is to permit construction of a seventy eight (78) lot subdivision to be developed in three phases. Roads constructed to NCDOT standards and dedicated public are proposed to be constructed to serve the subdivision. All lots will be served by public water and sewer service from OWASA. The property is designated Ten and Twenty Year Transition Area and zoned Residential--I1 (R-2) . Rezoning of the property was approved by the Board of Commissioners on May 5, 1986. This district permits the development of single family residential housing on minimum lot sizes of 20,000 square feet. The property is located within the Chapel Hill /Carrboro School District and the New Hope Fire District. Approval of the request would allow development of the seventy-eight lot subdivision in three phases with lot sizes ranging from 20,000 to 39,525 square feet. Using 9.51 trips per day per residence, an additional 742 trips per day would be generated by the development. (SEE Traffic Impact Study for further data. ) The Planning Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan with the following conditions: 1 ) include area south of stream buffer and west of Kosnikowski property as part of a lot or designate as open space Smith recommended that this condition be revised to "designate southern edge of stream buffer of Lot 09" . 2) designate remaining acreage of original tract for "future development" 3) indicate total acreage and open space acreage 4) include notation on applicable setback dimensions and revise the front and side setbacks for corner lots to comply with the provisions of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance 5) include complete notation on plat regarding restricted use of stream buffer 6) provide dedicated 10 'x 701 sight easements at all street intersections 7) provide a turn lane on Homestead Road as recommended by NCDOT 224-- DRAFT PB MINUTES 5-19-86 PAGE 11 8) provide temporary turn-arounds within dedicated rights-of-way as required by NCDOT 9) renumber lots consecutively within phases Pilkey inquired why a project this large did not come in as planned development. Smith responded the applicants were informed that planned development was one of their options but they chose to request a general rezoning and this was approved . Jacobs noted that there was a Traffic Impact Report indicating trip generation by this project but no current traffic figures were included. Jacobs also inquired about protection of existing vegetation. Redfoot indicated everything would remain wooded except the road. Smith noted that the 1985 traffic count was 2861 with this project generating an increase of about 25% at a service level of "B" . Ken Putnam from the audience inquired if the traffic count was made during the time that school is in session or during summer vacation. Smith indicated the time of year was not known; only that these were 1985 figures. MOTION: Hubbard moved to amend condition /1 to "designate southern edge of stream buffer of lot 19" . Hubbard expressed a concern with the impact that will be made on the schools. Smith responded that the school districts are contacted on every project but they never respond . When questioned about this, they simply say they are not sure what it means so they do not respond at all . Smith noted that the impact on the Chapel Hill system was considerably more than on the County system. Best noted that he had asked this question of Buz Lloyd at the rezoning hearing and he wished to hear the answer again . Lloyd indicated that he felt it is the responsibility of the school district to provide adequate school facilities. Jef, from the audience, stated that a study had been done by the State Department of Instruction dealing with maximum capacity of school systems . Smith responded that this is the kind of information needed for development projects . Hubbard inquired if the schools were already at 100% capacity, would this be sufficient reason to deny a project. Kizer responded that this could be a reason if the school boards would make such a statement. Shanklin noted that there would be no more schools constructed until the children were there ready to go to school . Liz Peters, 22e, DRAFT PB MINUTES 5-19-86 PAGE 12 from the audience noted that the Chapel Hill/Carrboro Schools are 120% over capacity. MOTION: Pilkey moved that a meeting be requested with the School Superintendents, Board of County Commissioners and appointed members of the Planning Board to discuss the problems of the projects and their impacts on the schools. Smith noted the Towns should also be involved in this meeting (Chapel Hill , Carrboro and Hillsborough) . Motion was seconded by Kramer. VOTE: 5 in favor (Kramer, Best, Hubbard, Jacobs, Pilkey) . 5 opposed (Yuhasz, Shanklin, Kizer, Walters, Lewis) . Motion failed . Best inquired the reasons for the "no" votes . Yuhasz noted that he did not feel the entire Planning Board should attend such a meeting. Jacobs responded the motion spoke to only designated members, not the full Planning Board. Shanklin commented that the Planning Board is not designated to look into school matters. Kizer agreed with Shanklin. Hubbard felt that land for schools is a land use matter. Kizer noted that if land for schools is a condition for approval of a development project, it' s a taking of land without compensation. if land is to be taken for public use, then let the County pay for it. MOTION: Yuhasz moved to reconsider the motion regarding a meeting of the School Superintendents, Board of County Commissioners and designated members of the Planning Board . Seconded by Pilkey. VOTE: 6 in favor. 4 opposed (Kizer, Best, Walters, Shanklin) . Shanklin seconded motion made previously by Hubbard including the revision of condition #1 . VOTE: Unanimous. MOTION: Shanklin moved approval of the Preliminary Plan for Homestead Highlands subject to staff conditions. Seconded by Lewis. VOTE: 6 in favor. 4 opposed (Kramer, Hubbard, Best, Jacobs) . O R A N G E C O U N T Y BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 22q ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date JUNE 17, 1986 Ac-Hon h ge_n d s SUBJECT: MEL-OAK PHASE II - PRELIMINARY PLAN Item PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes X No Attachment(s) information Contact: APPLICATION EDDIE KIRK VICINITY MAP SUSAN SMITH PRELIMINARY PLAN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN AGENCY LETTERS DRAFT 5-19-86 PLANNING BOARD MiNUTES Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 PURPOSE: To consider the Preliminary Plan for Mel -Oaks Phase Ii subdivision for approval . To receive the Planning Board 's recommendation . NEED: Calvin Mellott has requested approval of a subdivision for 10 acres of land located off Jones Ferry Road (SR 1942) on an extension of a previously created road known as Mel Oak Drive in Chapel Hill Township . The property in question Is known as lots 30A and 30C of Tax Map 117 . It is owned by Calvin Mellott. The purpose of the request is to permit construction of an eight (8) lot subdivision as an extension of the pre-- existing subdivision known as Mel Oaks. Two lots (15 and 6) established in Mel Oaks Phase i are proposed to be revised to accomodate the extension of Mel Oak Drive. Mel Oak Drive is proposed to be extended to serve the new phase and is to be constructed to NCDOT standards and dedicated public. The property is designated Rural Buffer and Protected Water Supply Watershed - University Lake. The property is zoned Residential -1 (R-1 ) and Protected Watershed II (PW- lI ) . These districts permit the development of single family residential housing on minimum lot sizes of 40,000 square feet. The property is located within the Chapel Hill /Carrboro School District and the Carrboro fire district. IMPACT: Approval of the request would allow development of the eight lot subdivision with lot sizes ranging from 40,023 to 60,227 square feet . A 1985 traffic count indicated 2000 vehicles per day on Jones Ferry Road (SR 1942) . Using 9.51 trips per day per residence, an additional 77 trips per day would be generated by the development. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Board recommends approval of the Preiimtnary Plan with the following conditions: 1 ) provide a 300 ' right turn lane taper on Jones Ferry Road as recommended by NCDOT 2) provide a temporary turnaround within a dedicated right-of-way for Mel Oak Road as required by NCDOT (Compliance with this condition requires that the cul -de-sac be platted as part of the right-of-way and not as part of a lot. ) 3) provide a dedicated 10' x 70 ' sight easement at the intersection of Mel Oak Drive and the future right- of--way extension to the Nancy Williams Lands (Compliance with this condition requires that the sight easements be platted as part of the right-of- way and not as part of a lot. ) 4) delete the solid line separating the future right- of-way to Nancy Williams Lands from Mel Oak Drivs and designate the future right-of-way as dedicated right-of-way 5) revise the plat in compliance with the requests of NCDOT: a. provide curve data for the extension of Mel Oak Drive through Mel Oak Phase 1 b. delete the dedicated right-of-way for the cut- de-sac platted for Mel Oak Phase 1 and incorporate the right-of-way into Lots 17, 8 and 9 (Compliance with this condition requires that Lots 18 and 9 be replatted with the revised right-of- way. ) c. provide for the transition in right-of-way between the 50' and 50' sections of Mel Oak Drive (Compliance with this condition requires that the Final Plat correspond with NCDOT approved road construction plans. ) 6) Include a graphic notation for Jones Ferry Road as part of the reference to the distance of 633 ' to the same from revised Lot #5 7) replat the cul -de-sac for Mel Oak Drive. to terminate at the southern lot lines of Lots #18 and 19 and designate a dedicated 50 ' right-of-way extending from the cul -de-sac north to the McLamb property (ADDED BY PLANNING BOARD - Planning Staff recommended that Mel Oak Drive extension be constructed across the applicant' s frontage to the McLamb property line. Compliance with the Planning 22t Board 's condition requires that the cul-de-sac be _ extended northward to provide Lots fl8 and 19 with adequate road frontage. ) The applicant revised his plan subsequent to the Planning Board meeting. The revised plan satisfies conditions f4, 5a and 6 . The remainder of the conditions of approval still apply. Statements have been added to each condition which indicate the requirements for compliance with the condition . • 2 2'r , SEE ° 1..... _ _��.� h1AP'37''40 � S 300b� �`r� '+�dd L. F AINQHAM TWSP . U P/10 126.53 AC .. ® - _ ` x6348 AC 1::798 1 �a pC -� see MAP 'b, h �� OE / • ow CL la / .- - Pr1 I) .t.,/ 851 MEL OAKS-� �` ? ,,0 4a-SI \\'------... Property of 7S.o&�, �� J r 1r -.t b.�7 3i. 1 �, , / LUP Designation: Rural Buffer& i I t Protected Watershed • � � � GkAMP1AN11Nip SEE MAP Zoning District: R-1 and PW-II I-{ / EC.z, 37- 33 / P/0 32.1 AC. DIMMIA/A TF' ti =4ah! °N3 { ('_ �,�1 ANL. � ^ 14 AC. F �?. LAKE ' 4ras,•••7. j v ( 3 13.ea as ! . .-r — -�1 _229,40■ 0715-.•• f- - - .\ C v .` PN` E :. 7336" .34 w1G. •3�► ' IA er^ ]431 i • C5 ID AC. ; 9aa // zies 2--39,s 31 ■ �r 10 AC . 12:Aiz c 4.1 ~ aa�z y s`Jo5 i 1093( 013176 AC 253'AC ra 27 12 25 AC CAI 1�, 27 41 AG. �`* '' 5.05•5C // .77: 341 AC sow 9795, P/0 2 6. i-8-4502�."7 • 2 IS C 2-6A . ` r \ � ; a.3 AC \` --. - _ 2.1 Tce , r p 1 1- F� Q 1� )I 1 ..• /7 �y "le 2749- 1 AIR' ET A G. �-89I ��. Hsu 1 '2015 ACI r i' nC Ae 416 I ]332 , I 001 —--.... ..--\\,$)..." I l 1 \. ,s 2967 ,f/ i _ •+ \----.. ---- \ O ' (730 li 1 4 2.07 ac �Y 157 6 AC. ;s aBeo 1 ./ . \ ■ \\ 1 /.7, \- ' . , \GI . N.. / /'1 1 PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT (INK ONLY) 22c 11135 APPLICATION DIV SI N AAPRO 9RANGE COIMTY DATE: SUBDIVISION NAME: _ _ /-- -. • LOCATION: : I . - . - _ ONtNEA10EVELOPEFI:. ADDRESS: , - ..' .._ TELEPHONE NO. : - AGENT/CONTACT: .: rr-`. - , -, -_�, TELEPHONE NO. : A. SUMMARY INFORMATION: : � _ � ' r `J• .Orange County Tax. Nap Block Lat4sl ;_ Townshi p .'=Zoning DistriatCal : Total. Number of Acres: Phases; • Total Number of Lots: Average Lot Size Minimum Lot Size y.__,_ Number/Typa of Structures(existing] , - - ,(proposed] -: • Lineal Feet in Streets: Acres in Open Space Mater Supply: ' - -- PubLic(specifyJ -5- - Community Individual Wastewater Disposal: ,Pub Li c(apaci fy l --.—.Communi :y ,_Individual. School. District: •.- •:.Po_ L. hti,..l.. Fire District: General Land Uses in Area:. F -7--, Critical.. Areas: 6 stream/dreinageweys D flood- prone areas. watershed(spool fyl 0 h1istoric sites. othsr(axplainl_ li-+co-D L p B. ALL plate must► be submitted an sheet no smaller than one inch equals two— hundred feet (1'12200' l and- no larger than one inch equals fifty feet (1 "=50' 1 and. must contain the !CI ',Lowing infarmation: subdivision nese imitating setback line. ' nos of awaeriel by natation or typical Ldt :heck I terns •" nee of surveyor, anginusr or Layout Laud planner �?., :ompleted) (tilt•] Preliminary Plan existing and proposed sawr- '}" - '' saute, north •rrow• (North-at #} rends, *cc.] utilities, tap of asp] ��_: `r date (Including revision drta•)L existing, proposed and ''7' tommbip, tun asp-]dock..lot `'^' enjoining rlghtab{-one •=r'+�^•"� inetudiny Manuel one and referendum :h stress nesee and state mad bonndar? deeoribed with `::?.p..: bearings sod dletanaaw oambarw _ :- tenet acreage of the tract * sainting and including and qe of lass. including = utllttiai, including < and eaoludtng area within q type. aizar, ---,,- ��, rightawwf-nay , : ■enit•lea• vaLrru and control ca . v existing proposed culvert ;•••'• proposed Las Lines eith '�^ '•'�,. .`: inatend • �'v'� ineLndla sited and grades :-v dimensions �; ^ typical street craws-aeatiann Lot numbers and Intersection dotal la _r,----::::5::= phasing linen >? including design and width `xx�' topogrwpny at tan foot (ttl] I la $ } of t rave luny snd sham tiers �J' •• .'=• •• horitantet ■L1 nment �- :`' meter bodies, , flood-. ' t end consent curve data (public .�y, say and f LOOdp lei no �'';�'�� rascal �l�-p stream batters and notation C 4•'. immanent features such as :;:r ; indicating restricted Al butldinge, esretariau, dasaL4paaat potential ti Alb Jgy ;ti•• hi steel d lendnerkw, C�1 -� :amnablp. aerporet• and extra- -:+`"•• ``� i?*:, tarrlterlat planning +r...i name' of ion Layout rill '--: jurisdiction Linea which owner of sdjaidlvi ions property �� owner's ems smbd1r1a10nw �----- ::N., cress the property laastlan and Site of parotid dedloatad fee public van or r in Common Location and site of Lots of rem.:Acted development p iel and -, notation an plat regarding same � ',,..,,„-ill stOrswetar eanegsmans plan indicating provision fee control of The first 1/2 inch of runoff from tepervioue ■urtacwa (hRAY ARFAS 'nR nE•FI rr IMF nfill y) OTHER SUBMITTAL. REQUIREMENTS: S . Twenty–six (28] copies of the preliminary plat 2. Tec full siaa d:.riaa of en Orange County Tax map Cone copy with tax parcels invoked aiearly marked] . 3. Where. municipaL or OWASA sewer is not available, a Latter from the Orange County Health Department certifying the proposed wastewater system for each Lot. , the applicant, hereby certify that the foregoing application is complete and °curate.. I understand that a. $210.00 fee (subdivisions of 15 lots or Lass) r a $370.00 fee (subdivisions of I6 lots or more) is due at the time of pp li cati on . A 58.00 per Lot fee is due at the time the final plat is resented for recordation . • e6;_„!_de°—_,„-- PP ICANT 'S SI GNAT ' UA OWNER IS 4:��- ATURE 4-71 ,g6 ATE DATE FEES; Amount ‘,2/0. oG Date Paid 3- 2F- tr‘ Receipt /42 e'9 23i MEL-OAK PHASE II 11/85 ORANGE COUNTY. CERTIFICATION AND APPROVALS -- PRELIMINARY PLAT STAFF ASSIGNMENT: EDDIE KIRK SKETCH PLAN: Received 3-14-$6 Reviewed 3-25-86 PRELIMINARY PLAT: Received 3-28-86 Reviewed 5-14-86 - REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT: Received 5-27-85 _ Reviewed 6744'.6- NCDOT : DATE 4-2-86 & 4-8-86C ERTIFICATION APPROVED WITH RECOMMENDED REVISIONS SCHOOL BOARD (Orange/Chapel Hill-Carrboro] : DATE ,Certification UTLITIES (OWASA/Hillsborough/Mebane/Orange Alamance/Durham) : DATE 3 _n Certification OTHER : Recreation Advisory Council (Date) Carrboro Fire Department (Date] Chapel Hill (Date] Carrboro (Date] Hillsborough (Date] Durham (Date] Other S&E OFFICER 4-7-86 (Date) (Date] PLANNING BOARD: Date K.19- P?; Approval Approval with Conditions x Denial BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS : Date Approval Approval with Conditions - Denial 231 HISTORY OF MEL-OAK ESTATES SUBDIVISION Elitzgaza a &_Qf_Aulazai ,l L 1 LAazts1 Mel-Oak Final 5-20-85 15 (19. 53 ) Estates Mel-Oak Preliminary Pending 8 (10 .0) Estates Phase II • o- 2 34 ,� • STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Graham, NC 27253-0766 JAMES G. MARTIN GOVERNOR April 2, 1986 DIVISION oF.HIGHwAYs JAMES E. HARRINGTON SECRETARY Orange County Mr.. Eddie Kirk Orange County Planning Department • 106 East Margaret Lane Hillsborough, NC 27278 Subject: Preliminary Plan Review of Mel-Oak Estates - Phase 2 Dear Mr. Kirk: This office has reviewed the preliminary plan for the Mel-Oak Estates - Phase 2 in Orange County and offer the following comments: 1. The horizontal layout of this plan is satisfactory. 2. The easement on Lots 7, 8, and 9 is not an adequate design for a cul-de-sac. With this particular design it could never be added to the System of maintained roads. We advise that it be deleted. 3. Need to show curve data for the new right-of-Way at Lots 7, 8, and 9. 4. Change temporary cul-de-sac at end of road to a permanent cul-de-sac. Still have note saying that when road is ex- tended, this cul-de-sac will be removed. 5. A 10' x 70' sight. distance recorded at proposed road bet- ween Lots 15 and 16. This review is for the preliminary plans only. The construction plans have not been turned into this office. I€ you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact this office. Yours very truly, (:)74227Mills JMM:jbh DISTRICT ENGINEER cc: Mr. James Plymire An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer L, 2 3 e a :a 4. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Graham, NC 27253-0766 JAMES G.MARTIN GOVERNOR April 8, 1986 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS JAMES E. HARRINGTON SECRETARY Orange County Mr. Marvin Collins Orange County Planning Department 106 East Margaret Lane Hillsborough, NC 27278 Subject: Mel-Oak Estates Subdivision Off SR 1942, Jones Ferry Road Dear Mr. Collins: We have reviewed the preliminary plan for the above development and offer the following comments: 1. The typical section should show six (6) inches of stone outside the edge of pavement. 2. A 300-foot right turn lane taper to be built on SR 1942, Jones Ferry Road. 3. A 10' x 70' sight distance is recorded at the intersection of Mel-Oak Drive and future extension. The property lines should follow this sight distance. 4. The right-of-way change of sixty (60) feet on Phase I to fifty (50) feet on Phase II should be ninety (90) degrees to centerline and at a property line if possible. 5.. The right-of-way line for the temporary cul-de-sac should be a recorded right-of-way and removed if road is extended. 6. Final approval of the grade, drainage, and alignment will be pending approval of the construction plan. If there are any questions, please advise. Yours very truly, JMM/JBH:jbh M. Mills DISTRICT ENGINEER cc: Mr. James Plymire An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 23q ,� � • (ranges Tiun.l. rr_z,�-t.n and try :Tartin nt ti • 300 West Tryon Street- . HiLLS5CROUGft PLC. 27275 •! Jib-LSE init- ;111e 3 ack, Director • • • MEMORANDUM T0: Eddie Kirk, Planner . Department of Planning • FROM: Mary Anne Black. 3 DATE: April 18, 1986 RE: Courtesy Review Comments HO AD mammas U)S Please be aware of my previous comments on this proposed subdivision submitted to Susan Smith on March 4, 1986. The 100' stream buffer appears adequate, but preliminary plan does not show the extension of the southern-most portion of this buffer into the short/narrow strip between the Kosnikowski property and the 20' gas line - easemeent. MEL-OAK ESTATES .— Phase 2 Should the branch of Neville Creek (which flows into University Lake) not be bordered with a stream buffer? Thank you for the opportunity pport:unity to make these staff comments. I will present these comments to the Orange County Recreation and Parks Advisory Council at their May meeting and will inform you of any changes/comments they may have. _ STURBRIDGE VILLAGE — Phase II Denoted stream buffer seems adequate. ST. MARY'S NORM I see no elements on the preliminary plan which warrent comment from a . recreation and parks perspective_ MAB/pbl CC: Lorraine Parker, Chair, Recreation & Parks Advisory Council Brian E. Cox, Southern District Supervisor Robert A. Jones, Northern District Supervisor H L o mt1,h. 732-97;31 234 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT HILLSBOROUGH NORTH CAROLINA 27278 rorq r _ w� ,I MEMORANDUM TO: Eddie Kirk, Planner FROM: Warren Faircloth , Erosion Control Officer F SUBJECT: Stormwater Management Plan for Mel-Oaks II Subdivision DATE: April 7 , 1986 Since this subdivision is located in the University Lake watershed , the Erosion Control Ordinance re- quires that the peak rate of discharge after develop- ment not exceed the predevelopment rate . The Stormwater Management Plan proposes to use a detention structure to capture runoff from the new road and release it at a rate not to exceed the predevelopment rate . The proposed plan meets the retluirements of the Ordinance . The disturbance necessary for this development will require the submittal and approval of an erosion control plan prior to the start of construction . c : Jerry Thompson DRAFT PB MINUTES 5-19-86 23i PAGE 7 MOTION: Best moved to recommend approval with staff's condition. Seconded by Kramer. Shanklin inquired in which township the property was. located. Smith responded Hillsborough. Yubasz inquired if the Board of County Commissioners had adopted a description of the location of the township lines. Smith responded there is no legal description of township lines. VOTE: Unanimous. 41PAGENDA ITEM #7e: MEL-OAK PHASE II - PRELIMINARY PLAN Presentation by Smith . The purpose of this agenda item is to consider approval of the Preliminary Plan for Mel-Oaks Phase. Ii subdivision. Calvin Mellott has requested approval of a subdivision for 10 acres of land located off Jones Ferry Road (SR 1942) on an extension of a previously created road known as Mel Oak Drive in Chapel Hill Township. The property in question is known as lots 30A and 30C of Tax Map 117. It is owned by Calvin Mellott. The purpose of the request is to permit construction of an eight (8) lot subdivision as an extension of the pre-existing subdivision known as Mel Oaks . Two lots (115 and 6) established in Mel Oaks Phase are proposed to be revised to accommodate the extension of Mel Oak Drive. Mel Oak Drive is proposed to be extended to serve the new phase and is to be constructed to . NCDOT standards and dedicated public. The property is designated Rural Buffer and Protected Water Supply Watershed - University Lake. The property is zoned Residential-1 (R-1 ) and Protected Watershed II (PW II ) . These districts permit the development of single family residential housing on minimum lot sizes of 40,000 square feet. The property is located within the Chapel Hil1/Carrboro School District and the Carrboro fire district. Approval of the request would allow development of the eight lot subdivision with lot sizes ranging from 40,023 to 60,227 square feet. A .1985 traffic count indicated 2000 vehicles per day on Jones Ferry Road (SR 1942) . Using 9 .51 trips per day per residence, an additional 77 trips per day would be generated by the development. The Planning Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan with the following conditions: 1 ) provide a 300 / right turn lane taper on Jones Ferry • 23r DRAFT PB MINUTES 5-19-86 PAGE 8 Road as recommended by NCDOT . 2) provide a temporary turnaround within a dedicated right-of-way for Mel Oak Road as required by NCDOT 3) provide a dedicated 101 x 70! sight easement at the intersection of Mel Oak Drive and the future right- of-way extension to the Nancy Williams Lands 4) delete the solid line separating the future right- , of-way to Nancy Williams Lands from Mel Oak Drive and designate the future right-of-way as dedicated right- , of-way 5) revise the plat in compliance with the requests of NCDOT: a. provide curve data for the extension of Mel Oak Drive through Mel Oak Phase I b. delete the dedicated right-of-way for the cul-de- sac platted for Mel Oak Phase I and i incorporate the right-of-way into Lots 17, 8 & 9 c. provide for the transition in right-of-way b between the 601 and 501 sections of Mel Oak Drive 6) include a graphic notation for Jones Ferry Road as part of the reference to the distance of 6331 to the same from revised Lot /5 . Walters inquired about condition #3 asking why the sight distance was required for the future right-of-way extension to the Nancy Williams Lands. Smith responded this would be extended as a public road eventually and a plat is needed showing the 100 x 701 sight easement before the lots are sold. MOTION: Best moved approval with staff conditions. Seconded by Kramer . Walters questioned why NCDOT wished the road extended. Smith responded there were some landlocked parcels and there were opportunities for future extension of the road . Walters inquired if the applicant agreed to this condition . Smith responded the applicant is present for questions . Jim Plymire, associate of the applicant, Calvin Mellott, noted that he did not understand the requirement to pave the road to the end . Mellott stated that the Williams property was not landlocked; there is. a driveway. Plymire continued that the applicant wished to end the cul -de-sac short of the property line with right- of-way dedicated to the property line. He felt that the expense of providing a paved road for others should not be his. DRAFT PB MINUTES 5-19-86 2 3 C PAGE 9 Yuhasz noted that this problem had arisen before and he felt the right-of-way should be reserved, but not dedicated or paved at the time of the subdivision. Smith responded that NCDOT will not accept an unconstructed dedicated right-of-way. She noted that the County Attorney is going to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners that they accept these public dedications without maintenance responsibilities . There is case law that supports this action so that the County could accept the public dedication of a reserved right-of-way and not get into the issue of whether DOT will sign off on the plat. Smith noted that it is a common planning practice to require the construction of a public road across the frontage of the owner doing the subdivision so that the next person then subsequently extends it across their lot. Jacobs noted that the applicant has no objection to dedication of the right-of-way. Jacobs asked about Recreation and Parks comments about the stream. Smith responded this was a drainage swale not a stream as verified on the USGS maps. Shanklin recommended an amendment to the motion to delete the reference to Nancy Williams Lands and insert lots 18 and 19. Smith recommended that this condition be left as is and a condition added stating "that the cul -de-sac be pulled back to serve lots 18 and 19 with a dedicated right-of-way extended from that cul -de-sac to the edge of the property." MOTION: Shanklin moved to amend the motion as recommended by Smith adding condition #7. Seconded by Walters. VOTE: 6 in favor. 4 opposed (Kizer, Best, Kramer, Hubbard) . VOTE ON MAIN MOTION: 7 in favor. 3 opposed (Kizer, Best, Kramer - all due to the feeling that it should be paved due to development pressures) . AGENDA ITEM #7f: HOMESTEAD HIGHLANDS - PRELIMINARY PLAN Presentation by Smith . The purpose of this agenda item is to consider approval of the Preliminary Plan for Homestead Highlands. Piedmont Atlantic Inc. has requested approval of a subdivision for 47. 19 acres of land located off Homestead Road (SR 1177) approximately 500 feet from the intersection of Homestead Road and Rogers Road in Chapel Hill Township. The property in question is known as lot 9 ORANGE- COUNTY . 3OARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ACTION AG 4DA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM I30 r0 METING CAT- June 17, 1986 SUBJECT: Demonstration Project to Provide Outreach Activities -Facilitator for Orange County Domiciliary Homes i CEPARTMENT- Aging -- Domiciliary Home PUBLIC HEARING:- YES x NO Community Advisory Committee 'Ai i ACHMEIT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT:. Linda Rahi j a, Chair Proposal Jerry Passmore PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH - 732-8187 - HILLEOROL'Grl - 732-9367 alAPa. HILL - 967-9251 • IMEANE - 227-2037 DURHAM - 688-.7337 • • PtAPtSE: To consider the Domiciliary Home Community Advisory. Committee's state - funded proposal to hire a Therapeutic Recreation Specialist for plann- ing, implementing and evaluating 'activities at the 16 Family Care and Rest Homes in Orange County. The proposal for Demonstration Project funding in the amount of $48,700 would be submitted to the N. C. General Assembly during the 1987 session. NEED: - As the Domiciliary Home Committee has made its monitoring visits over the past two years , there has been a continual need .for meaningful recreational activities. State law requires these homes 'have a minimum of ten hours of activities per week. These activities include watching T.V. , taking a walk, and playing Bingo. While the administrators often recognize the need for more meaningful activities , the time constraints of their other required duties and the special needs of this population often prevent the development of more appropriate activities. i;1PACi: No County funds would be required. If proven successful , State will be asked to continue funding on a permanent basis. This position would significantly improve the quality of life of the County's 200 Domiciliary Home Residents. • RECOMMENDATIQN(5) : The proposal has been endorsed by the Orange County Senior Citizens Board and the staff of the Retired Senior Volunteer Program. Recommend letter of support from Orange County Board of Commissioners. • 24t Proposal for a Demonstration Project To Provide an Outreach Activities Facilitator to Serve Family Care Rome and Rest Rome Residents Page 1. 241 'Proposal for a Demonstration Project To Provide an Outreach Activities Facilitator to Serve Family Care Hove and Rest Home Residents' Recognizing the critical need for the development of more appropriate activities and the coordination of community resources in domiciliary homes, the Domiciliary Home Community Advisory Committee of Orange County is proposing the creation and funding of an Outreach Activities Facilitator position to serve Family Care Home and Rest Home residents. This model project would provide budgetary expenses for a certified Therapeutic Recreation Specialist (see attached job description) who would function as a consultant and facilitator in the planning and implementation of therapeutic activities that would meet the needs, interests, and abilities of the domiciliary home residents. This specialist would also coordinate the utilization of community resources and provide orientation and supervision for students and volunteers who would assist in providing recreational and instructional activities to enhance and maximize activity opportunities for the residents. The Domiciliary Home Community Advisory Committee Program is the result of legislation passed by the North Carolina General Assembly in 1981. In passing this legislation, it was the intent of the General Assembly that each community in the state should take an active role in promoting the interests and well- being of all residents of domiciliary homes. This volunteer committee is made up of professionals from a variety of areas- who meet monthly and make regular visits to Family Care Homes and Rest Homes to ascertain the home's compliance with the Patient's Bill of Rights and to maintain direct contact with the residents and their needs. During these visits, committee members talk with administrators, visit with residents, observe activities, look over activity calendars and menus, and offer suggestions or follow-up to expressed needs. Social and recreational activities are an important aspect of community adjustment for residents of domiciliary homes. Administrators are required by state regulation to provide 10 hours per week of planned activities for their residents. Those activities are posted on a monthly calendar and usually include such things as watching T.V., taking a walk, playing BINGO, eating a snack, etc. The administrators often recognize the residents' needs for more structured and stimulating activities, but other required duties, time constraints, and the special needs of this population all too often prevent the development of more appropriate activities. Appropriate recreational activities are instrumental in the individual's development and maintenance of a sense of self-worth, and the ability of the individual to interact with others and the environment. The consequences of the above stated factors leaves many residents involved in very few structured and stimulating activities so necessary for their mental and physical well- being and greatly diminishes their quality of life. This directly impacts their personal growth, self-concept, and social interactions. The acute need for increased program planning and opportunities for recreational and instructional activities for residents has become increasingly 244 Page 2. apparent to committee members as a result of these monthly visits. Over the last two years, observation and discussion have elicited a number of needs these clients have that do not appear to be satisfactorily met by currently available resources. Requests (see attached) are made on almost every D.H.C.A.C. visit for assistance in increasing activities for the residents. Less than 15% of the clients attend or are eligible to attend day programs and few have regular contact with family or friends. Appropriate utilization of community volunteers requires the existence of training, supervision, and emotional support to insure success and continuity. A framework for this is not available to domiciliary residents. Meeting these needs through the development and implementation of a well- designed activities program is a priority goal of the Orange County D.H.C.A.C. These needs are: 1. The need to be involved in a community. Whether the community is as small as one's residence, one's workplace, or the larger community, a sense of involvement is a basic need. Older and disabled people are often overlooked in group and community involvement because of the challenge of individualizing recreational activities. These persons, too, need to feel that they have a place and value in their community. An Activities Facilitator would be able to encourage and facilitate the residents involvement in small and large group activities that would provide a foundation for individuals to become more involved in their community. 2. The need to occupy much expanded free time in more satisfactory ways. The most typical complaint of residents and administrators alike is that of the resident's boredom. This often signifies few activity choices and "too much time on their hands." A visitor to a domiciliary home can't help but notice the many residents who sit and stare at the TV for hours with only their meals and sleeping breaking up their day. Having a satisfying routine, enjoying oneself, being involved in stimulating activities, all contribute to a more positive self-concept and satisfactory life. Breaking out of the old pattern of non-activity into a more well-balanced pattern often requires the intervention and guidance of a specially trained person. An Activities Facilitator, by virtue of training and experience, would have the skills necessary to guide residents into more active participation. 3. The need to enjoy companionship and social interaction. Social interaction is a basic need and manifested in a variety of ways: the expressed joy of having a family member visit (often a rarity), coming up and touching a new visitor, smiles exchanged with fellow residents. Companionship and friendship make one feel valued. Without opportunities for this, withdrawal, illness, and depression can negatively impact on an individual. An Activities Facilitator would provide diverse opportunities (incorporating volunteers and students) for large and small group activities in which residents would be able to establish new friendships, share experiences with others, and interact with people having similar needs and interests. 4. The need for recognition as an individual. When someone speaks to you by name, establishes eye contact, or touches your arm in greeting, one feels Page 3. 24 c that his presence is acknowledged. Most residents feel overlooked and passed-by. They can easily get lost in the typical large group living situation. Time is often spent on the basic needs of eating, sleeping, and health maintenance. An Activities Facilitator would be able to plan activities to meet individual needs enabling residents to further appreciate and value their own individuality. 5. The need to have the opportunity for self-expression. The isolation of the elderly and often of residents in domiciliary homes does not encourage self-expression. The Activities Facilitator would create opportunities fo them to share experiences, create something, and establish new modes of self-expression that would increase their self-appreciation and provide a positive foundation for future personal growth. 6. The need for suitable mental stimulation. Positive mental stimulation has often been shown to have many beneficial effects on the over-all well-being of the elderly. Well-planned activities can provide stimulation of a variety of senses, tap forgotten skills, and enhance one's mental and physical quality of life. In order to meet these stated needs, the proposed model program will: 1. Provide individualized rehabilitation and, therapeutic activities to alleviate the effects of disabilities. A primary focus of the program is to teach skills , i.e., adaptive equipment usage, resource utilization, and an understanding of personal recreation abilities and limitations which are essential to enable the individual to overcome some of the effects of disability. 2. Provide equal recreation opportunities. The program will provide instruction to enable participants to acquire the skills necessary to permit them to have equal access to recreation opportunities. 3. Foster social interaction and physical and mental health. This will be accomplished through shared recreation experiences individualized to meet personal needs. 4. Promote personal satisfaction. Leisure skills taught will be based on the individual needs and interests of the program participants in an attempt to maximize the quality of life for that individual. In order to meet these objectives, a Therapeutic Recreation Specialist will be hired to fill the position of Outreach Activities Facilitator under the Orange County commission to work in coordination with the Department of Social Services and the Orange County Parks and Recreation Department. The Activities Facilitator will act as a facilitator and consultant for all Domiciliary Homes. She/he will be responsible for organizing the planning, implementation, and evaluation of activities based on the needs assessments of the residents involved. Training and supervision of students and volunteers to assist in program implementation will be a key cump.,ne:lt of this position. The .. 0 24� Page 4. Activities Facilitator will also act as a resource person to the home administrators in planning activities for their residents. She/he will also be responsible for developing contacts with community resources and facilitating client involvement. Direct contact with residents will enable the Activities Facilitator to meet individual needs and assess the appropriateness of on-going activities and their impact and values. Funding assistance is necessary at this time to aid in the acquisition of additional personnel, equipment, and resources necessary to implement the high Tuality program envisioned. The funding requested would enable the project to Further develop and establish a prototype based on client needs and to conduct follow-up activities essential to assure success. The utilization of - :fisting resources does not permit the attainment of this purpose. Throughout the program a variety of evaluation procedures will be utilized to aid in monitoring the usefulness of the program, pinpointing areas which would benefit from improvement and planning for beneficial revisions. The evaluation design will provide for the collection of quantifiable data using a variety of methods and data collectors. The evaluation instruments and formats will be developed during the first quarter and implemented in the second quarter. An outside evaluation will also document the effects of this model program and provide a summative evaluation. The impact of this model program will be examined for future establishment throughout the state. The success of this demonstration project depends upon clearly defined ,hjectives, adequate funding, and community support. With this, a substantial positive impact can be made on the lives of Orange County's domiciliary residents and the community will gain by having a well-designed model program that benefits a special need population. . BUDGET 24 : Salary $28,500 $20,000 represents the 100Z salary of the Therapeutic Recreation Specialist who will coordinate this demonstration project. $4,000. represents contractual secretary/clerical services for general office work, record keeping, . etc. $4500.00 represents the stipend for a graduate assistant from the UNC Therapeutic Recreation curriculum to extend the services available in this program. Benefits ` $4,000 $4,000 represents 20Z of salary of TRS (includes SSI, retirement, and medical/disability benefits. Travel . Tr . $2,400 Local travel throughout Orange County @ $100 per month = $1,200. Travel to state and national meetings to disseminate information about the model program. Two trips at approximately $600 per trip = $1,200. . Equipment - $3,500 General office equipment to equip TRS office (one time payment). Supplies $1,500 General office supplies $500. Recreation supplies to assist in the program implementation $1,000 Postage $300 Estimated at 125.00 per month = $300 Telephone $700 Estimated at $50.00 per month = $600, plus initial installation and service charges = $100 Consultants $5,400 External Eyaluat1on $3,000 to document the effects of thin,.model . program on residents, it is essential to contract with an unbiased, qualified evaluator. TR Consultant $2,400 to assist in the development and implementation of the project, the coordinator of Therapeutic Recreation at UNC-CH will serve as a consultant. He will also supervise the TRS and graduate assistant and will be the liaison . between this model program and the various • agencies involved services to be provided at $200 per month x 12 months = 43,000 Space Rental $2,400 Since this is a new program, there is no vacant county office space. $200 per month is required to rent a 6ma1l office. Total rental cost $2,400. !x48,700 TOTAL COST 24t JOB DESCRIPTION OUTREACH ACTIVITY FACILITATOR ORANGE COUNTY DOMICILIARY HOMES General Nature of Work : 1 .' Functions as a consultant and facilitator to the domiciliary home and rest home administrators and/or the assigned activities coordinator in the planning and implementation of the monthly activity programs. 2 . Assists faculty owners in designing , planning , and implementing therapeutic activities that meet the needs , interests, and abilities of the domiciliary home residents. 3. Develops and coordinates the use of students and volunteers in the activities program and provides the necessary supervision . 4 . Develops contacts with community activity resources and facilitates client involvement . Examples of Work Tasks : 1 . Assists facilities owners to develop a coordinated monthly therapeutic recreation program for the residents of the Orange County Domiciliary Homes that meet the needs , interests , and abilities of the clients. 2. Is available to assist home administrators and/or assigned activities coordinators in planning their monthly activities calendar . 3. Responds to requests for assistance in implementing planned activities . 4. , Assists facilities owners to develop additional activity programs and written program descriptions that meet the needs, interests , and abilities of the residents . 5. Develops contacts with community resources that provide recreation activities to enhance and maximize activity opportunities for residents . 6. Facilitates the utilization of community resources and coordinates these activities with the home administrators and/or assigned activities coordinator . 7. Provides written documentation of all resident contacts. 8. Provides liaison services to volunteer groups , agencies and individuals. 24, 8 . Provides liaison services to volunteer groups, agencies and individuals . 9 . Provides training and supervision to volunteers who assist in the activities program, i .e . , RSVP . 10 . Develops and promotes a positive working relationship with the University of North Carolina Recreation Curriculum and student training coordinator which encourages the utilization of recreation students in the activities program. 11 . Provides training and supervision to recreation students assisting in the activities program. 12 . Performs other therapeutic recreation duties as needed . Knowledge, Skills , and Abilities : 1 . Knowledge of therapeutic recreation theory, principles , techniques and methods and their specific implications as applications to the aging population . 2 . Knowledge of the characteristics of aging and its implications to therapeutic recreation program design , including the cognitive , social , and emotional , and physical ?mplicatioas of the aging process. 3 . Ability to plan and implement a variety of therapeutic recreation activities that enhance the dignity and self-esteem of the client . 4. Ability to evaluate the effectiveness of the therapeutic recreation program and to modify program goals and objectives to meet the needs, interests, and abilities of the client . 5. Ability to train and supervise volunteers and therapeutic recreation students in the basic techniques of therapeutic recreation programming . 6 . Ability to maintain a positive working relationship with clients , Domiciliary Home administrators and staff, UNC Recreation Curriculum, Volunteer agencies, resource agencies and the public . Minimum Education and Experience : 1 . Graduation from a four year college or university with a degree in therapeutic recreation which includes an internship or in recreation with a minor in therapeutic recreation which includes an internship; or an equivalent combination of education and experience . 24t• 2. Prefer certification as a Therapeutic Recreation Specialist with the National Council for Therapeutic Recreation Certification . • 04/86 cb _ 24 WW: Retired Senior Volunteer Program Yarr rn� l_ sang. aunty 410 CALOWELL STREET CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 TELEPHONE: 942-7248 HILLSBOROUGH: 732-8181 May 13, 1986 EXT. 280 Ms. Linda Rahija, Chair Orange County Domiciliary Home Community Advisory Committee 332 Brandywine Chapel Hill, NC 27514 Dear Ms . Rahija: I am so pleased that you are working to provide an Outreach Activities Facilitator to help the Family Care and Rest Home residents of Orange County. There certainly is a need for someone who can plan and implement therapeutic activities . Individuals who live in domiciliary homes often become bored, withdrawn, and depressed because of sheer idleness . An Activities Facilitator would have the skills needed to provide diverse, stimulating opportunities for the residents . The Activities Facilitator would also provide on-going super- vision, training, and coordination of volunteers. These valuable resources may live within or outside the domiciliary home. Within the home, volunteers may, for instance, sew toys for Head Start youngsters, deliver the mail , read to others, or tend a garden. Visitors to the home may help with handi- crafts, or recreational activities, but, more importantly, they soon become friends . Without the Therapeutic Specialist these valuable interactions would not happen. I am sure the success of your demonstration project will enhance the quality of life of Orange County ' s Rest Home resi- dents and will stimulate community resources on their behalf . Sincerely, K1-1t.tn Kay Huey, Director Retired Senior Volunteer Program KH/km cc: Jerry Passmore, Director Department on Aging A fIVlSinu nc Tug nnnunr _ . 25L ORANGE COUNTY DEPARTMENT ON AGING ,uthern Orange Senior Center Northern Orange Senior Center J Caldwell Street Extension 0.1„. 300 West Tryon Street Chapel Hill,N.C.27514 a Hillsborough,N. C. 27278 (919)968-4478 I 732-9361 —Hillsborough � � 967-9251 —Chapel Hill Jerry M.Passmore 688-7333—Durham Director 227-2032—Mebane May 9 , 1986 Ms. Linda Rahija, Chair Orange County Domiciliary Home Community Advisory Committee 332 Brandywine Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514 Dear Ms. Rahija: The Orange County Department on Aging' s Senior Citizens Board supports the Domiciliary Home Community Advisory Committee 's application for model project funds to em- ploy an Outreach Activity Facilitator to work with the Orange County Homes . We feel that a Facilitator would greatly enhance the quality of life of the 200 Orange County Residents in these homes. The Senior Citizens Board also plans to submit your pro- posal to the Orange County Board of Commissioners for their endorsement. We congratulate your Committee on its efforts and wish you success . Sincerely, Ruth West, Chair Orange County Senior Citizens Board 251 ORANGE CO1JN7'Y Action Ag BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS it No. � ACTION AGENDA ITE4 ABSTRACT MEETING DATE June 17, 1986 . ' Subject: VOTING DELEGATE - ANNUAL NACo CONFERENCE Department: BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Public Hearing: Yes X no Attachments: Information Contact: Beverly Blythe, Clerk NO Phone Numbers: 732-8181, 968-4501, 227-0231 PURPOSE: To designate a voting delegate and alternate delegate for the NACo Conference that will be held in Clark County, Nevada July 11-14. This will insure the County's participation in the voting process in the NACo annual business meeting. NE D: According to the constitution of the Associaiton, "each County represented shall be entitled to one vote which shall be the majority expression of the delegates of that County." IMPACT: One Commissioner will cast all the votes for Orange County. RECOMMENDATION: As the Board decides. ORANGE COUNTY Blank Fcrm: A 23 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NO. N MEETING DATE June 17, 1986 25� SUBJECT: Proclamation Declaring "July is National Recreation and Parks Month" in Orange County Recreation & Parks YES x NO DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC HEARING: + ATrT(3) : ! AC I INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Anne Black - Proclamation PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH - 732-8181 HILLSBOROUGH - 732-9361 - Sun-Fun 1986 summer program offerings CHAPEL HILL - 967-9251 brochure MEBANE - 227-20 31 Ext. 292 DURHAM - 688-7331 a y PURPOSE: To proclaim "July is National Recreation and Parks Month" in Orange County, as has been done in North Carolina by Governor Martin and on the national level by the National Parks and Recreation Association. NEED: To enhance public awareness and support by Orange County citizens for programs offered by the Orange County Recreation and Parks Department. IMPACT: N/A RECOMMENDATION(S) : As the Board decides. PROCLAMATION OF "JULY IS NATIONAL RECREATION AND PARKS MONTH" 25t! IN ORANGE COUNTY Whereas, positive leisure experiences are vital to good physical and mental health, and enhance the quality of life for all people; and Whereas, the Orange County Board of County Commissioners recognizes the benefits derived to the County by offering these leisure experiences; and Whereas, the Orange County Recreation and Parks Department offers programs encompassing a multitude of activities that can result in personal accomplishment, self-satisfaction and family unity for all citizens, regardless of their background, ability, level or age; and Whereas, the Board of County Commissioners wishes to encourage and endorse the concept of "July is National Recreation and Parks Month" in Orange County; and Whereas, Governor Martin has proclaimed "July is National Recreation and Parks Month" in North Carolina; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED THAT THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DOSS HEREBY PROCLAIM "JULY IS NATIONAL RECREATION AND PARKS MONTH" IN ORANGE COUNTY. BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board of Commissioners encourages all citizens of Orange County to participate in the leisure activities sponsored by the Orange County Recreation and Parks Department, not only during this designated month, but year-round. THIS, the day of June, 1986. Don Willhoit, Chair Orange County Board of Commissioners 25q ORANGE COUNTY Action Agenda BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS it Ho. Z. ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT PANG DATE June 17, 1986 • Subject: APPOINTMENTS 1 Department: BOARD OF CO1 IISSIONBRS I I Public Hearing: Yes X no Attachments: Information Contact: Beverly A. Blythe Under Separate Cover Phone Numbers: 732-8181, 968--1+501, 227-0231 PURPOSE: To maintain membership at effective levels on Commissioners' appointed Boards. The following vacancies are announced for the first time for information and/or reappointment. A-1 - ABC BOARD - 1 expiration of term for Mary Howes. A-4 - COMMISSION FOR WOMEN 4 resignations (Jane Delissovoy, Lani Cartier, Ruth Royster and Karol Stang) and 3 expiration of terms (Sally Marshall, Eva Metzger, and Miriam Saxon). A-5 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION - 1 resignation (Harold Thornton) and 3 expiration of terms (John Gastineau, Dennis Howell, and Paul Williams). A-9 - ORANGE COUNTY LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES- 2 expiration of terms (Cecil Sanford and Francis B. Defriess). A-12 - PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL - 1 resignation from Mike Kirby. B-1_ BOARD OF HEALTH - 3 expiration of terms (Evelyn Lloyd, Dr. Philip Singer and Dr. Eugene Howden. 11-2 - BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES- 1 expiration of term for Shirley Marshall. 11-4 - COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS BOARD - 1 resignation (Ruth West) and 3 expiration of terms (Shirley Marshall, Lula Mae Cotton and Rev. Richard Hildebrandt). B-5 - DOMICILIARY HOME COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE - 2 expiration of terms (Maggie Lee and Linda Rahija). B-6 - HEALTH AND MEDICAL CARE ADVISORY BOARD - 1 expiration of term for Kenneth Strayhorn. 8-10- NURSING HOME COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE - 2 expiration of terms (Sally Jeanne Marshall and Zelda Moore). 13-18- TRIANGLE J EMS COUNCIL - 2 expiration of terms (Jeanette T. Smith and Dr. Alfred Hansen). C-5 - HILLSBOROUGH BOARD OF ADJ STMENT - 1 expiration of term for Caleb Moore. 2 5 4 APPOINTMENTS PAGE 2 The following vacancies are announced together with the indication of the status of securing candidates for possible appointment consideration. These vacancies have been duly advertised: A-13 - RECREATION AND PARKS ADVISORY COUNCIL - 5 vacancies; a recommendation has been received from the Council. B-11 -SOLID WASTE TASK FORCE - 2 resumes are submitted for consideration. C-8 - ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD -- 17 resumes are submitted for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS BOARD - the following nominations have been received: 1. The Orange County Planning Board nominated Tim Hubbard. 2. Agricultural Extension nominated Jerry Taylor. 3. Soil and Water Conservation nominated Don Cox and Quentin Patterson. 4. The Solid Waste Task Force nominated Terry Pierson. 5. The Town of Chapel Hill nominated Robert Smythe, Carole Crumley, Richard Rehm, Raymond Burby, Carl Shy, Dave Moreau and Pete Andrew. 6. OWASA nominated Everett Billingsley, Pat Davis and Ron Williamson. 7. The Board of Health nominated Evelyn Lloyd. 8. The Economic Development Commission nominated Norman Weatherly. ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 106 EAST MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGH, N. C. 27278 MOSES CAREY - BEN LLOYD SHIRLEY E.MARSHALL June 17, 1986 NORMAN WALKER DON WII.LHOIT . North Carolina Utilities Commission Raleigh, North Carolina To the Utilities Commission Members: _On behalf of the Orange County Board of County Commissioners, I hereby request a study to be made of the costs that could be entailed on a per subscriber basis were extended area service to be approved for parts of Orange County. Such information is necessary to explore the feasibility of an extended area telephone service connecting Durham, Chapel Hill and Hillsborough. While Orange County would be greatly benefited by the toll-free calling area, we believe that information relevant to the cost of this service should be made available as a prerequisite to the feasibility study. It is the understanding of this Board this request represents no commitment, nor creates-.`any obligati_on_to.endorse._the.,extended area service, but rather will.allow us to obtain full information concerning EAS in the designated areas. - Your cooperation is appreciated.: Sincerely, Don Willhoit Chairman, Orange County Board of Commissioners /bab File tool; of 0 . M w IL 4 X9'14 Clot.e ORANGE COUNTY HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 300 WEST TRYON STREET HILLSBOROUGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27278 PHONE: (919) 732-8181; EXT 425 . CHAPEL HILL 967.9251; DURHAM 6788-7331: MEBANE 227-2031 . NOTICE OF AWARD TO R.W. Jones Grading and Hauling_ Ccmnany 320 West_Corbin Street Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 ' PROJECT/CONTRACT DEMOLITION, LOT CLEARING AND HAULTNG SERVICES The owner has considered the Bid submitted by you for the above Work dated June 2 , 19 86 , and Information for Bidders. You are hereby notified that your bid has been accepted in the amount of Seven Thousand nine hundred dollars ($ 7,900.00 )• - You are required by the Information for Bidders to execute the Agreement and furnish the required certificates of insurance within ten calendar . days from the date of this Notice to you. If you fail to execute said Agreement and to furnish certificate within ten days from the date of this Notice, said Owner will be entitled to consider all your rights arising out of the Owner's acceptance of your Bid as abandoned and as a forfeiture of your Bid Bond. The Owner will be entitled to such other rights as may be granted by law. You are required to return an acknowledged copy of this Notice to the owner. Dated this 17th day of Jung , 19 16 . OWNER //— • _• , ""f• •��s.- BY l'.dv, W /Ir Chairman, Board of ommissioners Enclosures RECEIPT OF THIS NOTICE IS HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGED THIS day of , 19 . BY TITLE ell EOUAI. HOUSING OPPORTUNITY ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 106 EASr MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGH, N. C. 27278 USHER vim, BEN LLOYD BKIRLEY E.MARSHALL NORMAN WALKER RON WILL/WIT June 20, 1986 Chief Clerk North Carolina Utilities Commission Attn: Mr. Bill Partin P. 0. Box 29510 Raleigh, NC 27626-0510 Dear Commissioners: Reference Docket No. P-89, SUB 23 At the Orange County Board of Commissioners' meeting on June 17, 1986, I was authorized, by unanamous vote, to request an extension through July 14, 1986 for replying to the Respondents Joint Reply. By this letter, I am confining our telephone request for this extension made by Mr. Richard A. Relwig on my-behalf with Mr. Bill Partin on June 19th.` - .,: ,Ca f rte+ :, ^«;rte:; `::_ _ r+. ` 4 + ,...• •.` ti..µ v▪4, Y- t- � -.•^.:_.. Don,Wi:l lh-itw ,,,,,',:1--,-.---,,A,, = - - 1 _,._ _ •i'i`�-'S • � ''7- S ij';'+"_..-r` I✓,'.II Tj. :A••s Chairman' : -1 1 , - Y i .,,: " t _ - - t?. ms --- ; ,t4,,.. r Yy '- __ s-- .a.a - y:"�r RAIL:ws ` ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 108 EAST MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGH, N. C. 27278 MOSES CAREY HEN LLOYD S RiLEY H,IAARSHA_ NORMAN WALKER DON W.ILLHOIT June 23 , 1986 Representative Anne Barnes 313 Severin Street Chapel Hill, NC 27514 Dear Ms. Barnes: This is in reference to a proposal in the General Assembly to authorize the removal of the internal program caps in the exceptional child service component of public education. The Board hereby solicits your support for this removal which we understand would allow the State to provide an additional allocation of 14.5 million statewide for this purpose. Both Orange County Schools and the Chap ]►,,. Hill-Carrboro School system would be greatly,,affected by :. additional allocation of one since l al funds Ave i for supple- mentamy. assis ice y to exceptional a tional ch n the two Thank -_ • :... yo or" your continued State-s04 . of measures to expand t atiana1:Aopport nit ' children. _ ^; ' ";A ?ge County :: Best Wig 1 t 7 Don Willhoit /bab Chair File cc: Ron Aycock, Executive Director, NCACC ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 106 EAST MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGH, N. C. 27278 MOSES CAREY BEN LLOYD SHIRLEY N.MARSHALL, NORMAN WALKER DON WILLHOIT June 19, 1986 Mr. Troy Woodward, Mayor City of Graham 201 S. Main Street Graham, NC 27253 Dear Mayor Woodward: The Orange County Board of Commissioners unanimously approved a resolution supporting the reclassification of Quaker Lake and Graham-Mebane watersheds from WS-111 to WS-l. A copy of the resolution is attached. If any additional information is needed, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Beverly A. Blythe Clerk /bab File Attachment CC . C.1<H e_. c�s • RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE RECLASSIFICATION OF QUAKER LAKE AND GRAHAM--MEBANE WATERSHEDS FROM WS-ili TO WS-I . WHEREAS, The North Carolina Environment Management Commission proposes to adopt and implement new descriptive classifica- tions for water supply watersheds to provide more appropriate protection for surface water supplies used as. a raw water source for drinking water; and WHEREAS, The City Council of The City of Graham has peti- tioned the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission to reclassify the Quaker Lake and proposed Graham-Mebane Reservoir watersheds from WS- ill to WS- l ; and WHEREAS, Orange County supports a comprehensive water supply watershed management program throughout the County, including the Back Creek Reservoir Watershed Critical Area Treatment program; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, The Board of County Commissioners of Orange County supports the resolution (attached) requesting the reclassification of Quaker Lake Watershed and proposed Graham-Mebane Watershed from WS- III to WS- I . Adopted this the 17th day of June, 1986. DON WILLHOIT, CHAiR ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: Beverly BI,'t e, Clerk Orange County Board of Commissioners - RESOLUTION REQUESTING RECLASSIFICATION OF QUAKER LAKE WATERSHED AND PROPOSED GRAHAM-MEBANE WATERSHED FROM WS-III TO WS-I WHEREAS, the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission proposes to adopt new improved description classifications for water supply watersheds to provide more appropriate protection for surface water supplies used as a raw water source for drinking water; and WHEREAS, the Quaker Lake watershed and the proposed Graham-Mebane Reservoir watershed that are now classified WS-III appear to meet the requirements for the WS-I classification of the proposed designation; and WHEREAS, the reclassification of the Quaker Lake watershed and the proposed Graham-Mebane Reservoir watershed to WS-I will be to the benefit of the health and welfare of the present and future customers dependent upon these water supply sources. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That the Town Council of the Town of Mebane petitions the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission to reclassify the Quaker Lake and the proposed Graham-Mebane Reservior watersheds that are now classified as WS-III to the new classification of WS-I promptly upon adoption of the new watershed classifications. 2. That the Mayor of the Town of Mebane is authorized and directed to file such necessary applications, furnish the appropriate information, and take such other action as needed to support the consummation of the reclassification requests. 3. That copies of this resolution be forwared to Alamance County, Orange County and the City of Graham, along with a request of support for this reclassification of the watersheds. Adopted this 2nd day of June, 1986. Anwor"..... 4440/At_ C. Brooke=rdner, Mayor ATTE T,•� r '�4 - ✓ 4,4444 E ne J. Hicks, Town Clerk C.Brooks Gardner, Teen of 4tibzute ElaineJ_Hicks Mayor as Totes Clerk/Finance Officer CHARTERED IN 1881 Bernice 0.Wilson Tax Collector Mebane, N. C. 27302 GradyCaviness Chief of Police Richard L.French,Town Manager Timothy Bradley Chief Fire Dept Council: Delmar Lankford Donald B.Laws Public Works Director William R.Hupman,Jr. Paul Young James A.Jobe,Jr. Chief Inspections Everette Pender DeoaisHodge Jesse Rice June 19, 1986 Wastetreatntent Superintendent Ken Thompson Orange County Manager 106 E. Margaret Lane Hillsborough, NC 27278 Dear Mr. Thompson: Enclosed is a resolution adopted by the Mebane Town Council on June 2, 1986 pertaining to the reclassification of Quaker Lake Watershed and the proposed Graham - Mebane Watershed from WS-111 to WS-1. A similar Resolution was previously adopted by the Graham City Council. By this Resolution, we are requesting Orange County's support for this reclassification of the watersheds. If additional information is needed, please call me. Sincerely, Elaine J. Hicks Acting Town Manager W ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 106 EAST MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGH, N. C. 27278 MOSES CAREY BEN LLOYD SHIRLEY E.MARSHALL NORMAN WALKER DON WILLHOIT ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 8606-308 TO: Mary Anne Black FROM: Beverly A. Blythe SUBJECT: PROCLAMATION DATE: June 26, 1986 Attached is a copy of the proclamation that the Board approved on June 17, 1986. If I can ever be o assistance, please do not hesitate to contact . Thank you. cy: it-4' - _-= — --_---- ._-., ; -.•., _ ,„fie ..... i' a s•+ w ,ri , , 1 X3:5 ! ., P Y. x j • PROCLAMATION OF "JULY IS NATIONAL RECREATION AND PARKS MONTH" IN ORANGE COUNTY Whereas, positive leisure experiences are vital to good physical and mental health, and enhance the quality of life for all people; and Whereas, the Orange County Board of County Commissioners recognizes the benefits derived to the County by offering these leisure experiences; and Whereas, the Orange County Recreation and Parks Department offers programs encompassing a multitude of activities that can result in personal accomplishment, self-satisfaction and family unity for all citizens, regardless of their background, ability, level or age; and Whereas, the Board of County Commissioners wishes to encourage and endorse the concept of "July is National Recreation and Parks Month" in Orange County; and Whereas, Governor Martin has proclaimed "July is National Recreation and Parks Month" in North Carolina; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED THAT THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DOES HEREBY PROCLAIM "JULY IS NATIONAL RECREATION AND PARKS MONTH" IN ORANGE COUNTY- BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board of Commissioners encourages all citizens of Orange County to participate in the leisure activities sponsored by the Orange County Recreation and Parks Department, not only during this designated month, but year-round. THIS the /7754' day of June, 1986. & t4IJ1hY Don Willhoit, Chair Orange County Board of Commissioners ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 106 EAST MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGH, N. C. 27278 MOSES CAREY BEN LLOYD SHIRLEY E.MARSHALL NORMAN WALKER DON WILLHOIT June 26, 1986 Mr. Robert L. Ferguson, Director Central Piedmont Employment & Training P.O. Box 667 Durham, NC 27702 Dear Mr. Ferguson: I have attached the signed amendment to the Consortium Agreement between Orange County, Durham County and Durham City. Please return to me a fully executed copy of this amendment for my files. If any additional information is needed, or if I can ever be of assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Thank you. Sincerely, Beverly Blythe Clerk IC 0 FT LEASE AGREEMENT RENEWAL NORTH CAROLINA ORANGE COUNTY WHEREAS , A lease agreement was made and entered into as of the 29th day of August, 1983 by and between Orange County, LESSQE and Wake-Opportunities, Inc. , TENANT , for space to be used as a Day Care Center at the Cedar Grove Multipurpose, N.C. HWY 86 N. WHEREAS , the LESSOR and the TENANT wish to renew the lease agreement. NOW THEREFORE , LESSOR and TENANT mutually agree to the following: (1) The lease agreement will be continued for a period of one year commencing on July 1, 1986 and ending at 12:00 midnight on the day of June 30, 19847. PcT (2) All other terms and conditions will remain the same. This agreed to, the /74-13- day of 1986. LESSOR: Orange County BY: 1)(0119-4;./ Don Willhoit Chairman, Orange County Board of Commissioners Ar ATTEST: 4:0F ,--. . - Ae _- . ! , TENANT: ��i __.. .��_ _... 0 / , Wake Opportu i ies, Inc. LEASE AGREEMENT t ' y' RENEWAL NORTH CAROLINA ORANGE COUNTY WHEREAS , A lease agreement was made and entered into as of the 29th day of August, 1983 by and between Orange County, LUNE and Joint Orange-Chatham Community Action, Inc. , TENANT , for space to be used as a Community Center as the Cedar Grove Multipurpose Center, Cedar Grove, North Carolina. WHEREAS , the LESSOR and the TENANT wish to renew the lease agreement as amended. NOW THEREFOR , LESSOR and TENANT mutually agree to the following: (1) The lease agreement will be continued for a period of one year commencing on July 1, 1986 and ending at 12: 00 midnight on the day of June 30, 1987. (2) All other terms and conditions will remain the same. This agreed to, the /..; _ day of 1986. LESSOR: Orange C� � ,� County BY: (AL Don Willhoit Chairman, Orange County Board of Commissioners ATTEST: 40C-4L64_____42AP4 TENANT: h..N / L1 ,,c4 Joi Orange-C'Y�atham Community Action, Inc. LEASE AGREEMENT _ RENEWAL ..,v JUL 31986 NORTH CAROLINA ORANGE COUNTY ORANGE COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES WHEREAS , a lease agreement was made and entered into as of the 15th day of November, 1983, by and between Orange County, LESSOR and The Community School for People Under Six, TENANT the Northside�MultipurposetCenterSeChapelaHDill,CN.C.Center at WHEREAS , the LESSOR , and the TENANT wish to renew the lease agreement as amended. NOW owi THRE EFORE LESSOR and TENANT mutually agree to the follng: (1) The lease agreement will be continued for a period of one year commencing on July 1, 1986 and ending at 12:00 midnight on the day of June 30, 1987. (2) The Lessor 's monthly utility charge shall be $325.00 per month. (3) All other terms and conditions will remain the same. This agreed to, .the day of 1986. LESSOR: Orange Count BY: Don Willhoit Chairman, Orange County Board of Commissioners ATTEST: TENANT: /L„ I/Wi,_ The Commu t 4 School for People Under Six • • } The Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange, North Carolina, met in regular session in the old Post Office in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, the regular place of meeting, at 7: 30 o'clock p.m. on June 17, 1986. Present: Don Willhoit, Chair; Commissioner Moses Carey; Commissioner Ben Lloyd; Commissioner Shirl Marshall; and Commissioner Norman Walker Absent: None ****************************************************************** The Chair announced that this was the hour and day fixed by the Board of Commissioners for the public hearing on the Preliminary Assessment Roll filed with the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County pursuant to the direction of the Orange County Board of Commissioners and pursuant to the Board' s decision to finance the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road (s) #1194 and #1198, also known as Rollingwood Road and Stallings Road, in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina. The Chair also announced that the Board of Commissioners would immediately hear anyone who might wish to be heard on the Preliminary Assessment Roll. Various persons appeared and were recognized and heard on the said Preliminary Assessment Roll. Those recognized and the essence of their comments were recorded by the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners in the minutes of the Board. 1 Thereupon, upon Motion of Commissioner Marshall . seconded by Commissioner Carey and carried, the Preliminary Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road (s) #1194 and #1198, also known as Rollingwood Road and Stallings Road, in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina, was confirmed in toto • The vote upon confirmation of the assessment made against each property owner was: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: Upon motion of Commissioner Marshall , seconded by Commissioner Carey , and unanimously approved, the Clerk to the Board was directed to enter into the minutes of the Board the confirmation date, hour, and minutes. Thereupon, the Clerk to the Board entered the confirmation effective _ 8 :21 o'clock p.m. , the 17th day of June, 1986. Upon motion of Commissioner Marshall , seconded by Commissioner Carey , and unanimously approved, the Clerk to the Board was directed to deliver a copy of the confirmed Assessment Roll to the Orange County Tax Collector. Upon motion of Commissioner Marshall , seconded by Commissioner Carey , and unanimously approved, the Orange County Tax Collector was directed to publish once, a Notice, no earlier than twenty (20) days from the date of confirmation as 2 herein set forth, that the Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road (s) #1194 and #1198 , also known as Rollingwood Road and Stallings Road, located in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina, has been confirmed and that assessments may be paid without interest at any time before the expiration of thirty (30) days from the day that the Notice is published and that if not paid within that time, all installments thereof shall bear interest in an amount equal to the interest on past due ad valorem taxes in Orange County. The Chair directed that said Notice shall be published in the Durham Morning Herald. Said Notice shall be in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF CONFIRMATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE FINANCING BY ORANGE COUNTY OF THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COSTS OF PAVING NORTH CAROLINA STATE ROAD (S) #1194 AND #1198 , ALSO KNOWN AS ROLLINGWOOD ROAD AND STALLINGS ROAD, LOCATED IN CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Notice is hereby given that pursuant to Article 9 of Chapter 153A of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the Board of Commissioners of Orange County has confirmed the Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road (s) #1194 and #1198, also known as Rollingwood Road and Stallings Road, in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina, in toto . The specifics 3 of any adjustment made are in the minutes of the Orange County Board of Commissioners for its meeting on June 17 , 1986. The confirmed Assessment Roll reflects any adjustment. Pursuant thereto: 1. The Board of Commissioners of the County of Orange, North Carolina, met in regular session in the old Post Office in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. on June 17 , 1986. 2. The Chair announced that this was the hour and day fixed by the Board of Commissioners for the public hearing on the Preliminary Assessment Roll pursuant to the Board' s decision to finance the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road (s) #1194 and #1198, also known as Rollingwood Road and Stallings Road, located in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina. 3. All persons attending and wishing to be heard were recognized by the Chair and were heard. 4. The Board confirmed the Assessment Roll and directed its delivery to the Orange County Tax Collector. 5. The assessments confirmed by the Board may be paid without interest at any time before the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of the publication of this Notice. If not paid 4 within this time, all installments thereof shall bear interest at the rate set for past due Orange County ad valorem taxes. JOHN T. HORNER, Tax Collector for Orange County, N.C. I, Beverly Blythe, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange, North Carolina, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of so much of the proceedings of the Board of Commissioners for said County at a meeting held on June 17, 1986, as relates in any way to the confirmation of the Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road (s) #1194 and #1198, also known as Rollingwood Road and Stallings Road, located in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina. BEVERLY BLYTHE, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, N.C. [SEAL] 5 ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 106 EAST MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGH, N. C. 27278 MOSER CAREY BEN LLOYD SHIRLEY E.MARSHALL NORMAN WALKER DON WILLEM July 14, 1986 Joe Myers, Director Division of Emergency Management Dept. of Crime Control and Public Safety P.O. Box 27687 Raleigh, NC 27611 Dear Mr. Myers: Attached is a copy of th esolution th- was approved by the Orange County Board off. mmissioners µ` , heir meeting held June 17, tU986 m regarding;`°' he She Nuclear Plant. 4lf,„-,"°.7�ris N yi �ff•• e� This was ' �. a�4'''.40\":''- '7.--, s� x � .� �:,� 4 who live in , ` �` 4° eht , . F by citizens 0 . -x .y. kw a. +.-..�.e w, I f you i.I . .G ARC 1- ," :ou Y .g uF �`h . =ion please do not hesit-4 o .- ,, k, nos - - 'Thank tr �� d�r�A { �� � a� n �... a�,� �.:4 ",�. r s•r:_ � rtttatlf�l �� 7�&a� a xti�. Y ,,ta ar 4,� r s,« -� r Jt N- t { �� ".' -- -�.,,-r_ -. .��4 r s ue- n'�i�A... S incerel: „�; pu � r Y, UlJ Don Willhoit Chair /bab File Attachment ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 106 EAST MARGARET LSE HILLSBOROUGH, N. C. 27278 MOSES CAREY LLOYD R}URLEY S'.MARSHALL. NORMAN WALKER DON WII,LROIT July 7, 1986 Linda Rahija, Chair Orange County Domiciliary Home Community Advisory Committee 332 Brandywine Chapel Hill, NC 27514 Dear Ms. Rahija: The Orange County Boar ;, of Commissioners at their meeting on June 17, 1986, rev ed your comm. ee's proposal for demonstration project f 'ng to prow.' . an outreach activities facie 'tato for th��'aunty's TS** ^4 , s and famil care homes. A -4_ -=:-.:-====i W Y _ . .-. ..f The Coun I 3'; •"„ i:ssia which would su• . E1=s Program d` '>.: r . - d, meaningful activities fo.-w, - " "` g posal as a me o yed 'u the pro- to older cit ' a b en tie c ;imp vee available ±. r > a 11•'_11 3 1 1 I " a'a ! a4,+ Good lu.,:; � �.. <r � ahead with t '' - , _ '. ":V aV x • ...,- al to move DSi rely, Don i lhWt-e/` / Chair /bab File ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 106 EAgr MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGH, N. C. 27278 MOSES CAREY REIN LLOYD SHIRLEY E MARSHALL NORMAN WALKER DON WILLHOIT July 14, 1986 Edward G. Lilly, Jr. Executive Vice President Carolina Power and Light P.O. Box 1551 Raleigh, NC 27602 Dear Mr. Lilly: Attached is a copy of t- --i resolution th- was approved by the Orange County Board of .4. 1imissioners - %'-., 'their meeting held June 17, x1986. regardinthe She4r- t' -;;--rris Nuclear Plant. , This was --- r.4, by citizens who live in 0 '.-,'0, ,; -. 0,-7 , _r,11, ,.. ,,- .,... ,„, . ,,,,, , iist,„..1,0 , - If you 11-i.')-1n -*" 6 S#ittil ',- please do not hes itc1;',. td p f-lip.'k ip_two;, ,- i ' - pe, ' : *P% ,,4 L rk, , T ; o,44 , _ _ .,k. N it;, ''', _ Thank ytt, ... - ,: ' h-- - —-- , - '': - 'A' i _,.._ _.„ Srinderely, liar■ tiLigh.4.--"'"/ Don Willhoit Chair /bab File Attachment ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 106 EAST MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGH, N. C. 27278 MOSES CAREY BEN LLOYD SHIRLEY E.MARSHALL r. NORMAN WALKER tON WTLLHOIT July 14, 1986 Harold Denton Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 2 101 Marietta Street, NW Atlanta, GA 30323 Dear Mr. Denton: by Attached is a copy of the) resolution t• .:: was approved y the Orange County Board ofmmissioners . ',: heir meeting held June 17 ,-_198 Plant ' , regardL the S *::�,ah ris Nuclear This was " ' nse _ e t ',;14.7',6 x who live in O "+ e ent citizens If you `�^� -- �. �k,. F � 41;,-. , .r iy , C1e Lc. 'o do not hesit- i = A -on, please *, ' r ': , i G -,4 f „ i y ' fir;: Thank y -. " a.. "^�i _.,+ �rF k:;: d K"F'F 61 Sincerely, ar.. W T4,144....: Don Willhoit Chair /bab File Attachment The Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange, North Carolina, met in regular session in the old Post Office in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, the regular place of meeting, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. on June 17, 1986. Present: Don Willhoit, Chair; Commissioner Moses Carey; Commissioner Ben Lloyd; Commissioner Shirl Marshall; and Commissioner Norman Walker Absent: None ****************************************************************** The Chair announced that this was the hour and day fixed by the Board of Commissioners for the public hearing on the Preliminary Assessment Roll filed with the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County pursuant to the direction of the Orange County Board of Commissioners and pursuant to the Board ' s decision to finance the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road #1195, also known as Meadow Lane, in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina. The Chair also announced that the Board of Commissioners would immediately hear anyone who might wish to be heard on the Preliminary Assessment Roll. Various persons appeared and were recognized and heard on the said Preliminary Assessment Roll. Those recognized and the essence of their comments were recorded by the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners in the minutes of the Board. 1 J Thereupon, upon Motion of Commissioner Marshall , seconded by Commissioner Lloyd and carried, the Preliminary Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road #1195, also known as Meadow Lane, in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina, was confirmed in toto . The vote upon confirmation of the assessment made against each property owner was: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: Upon motion of Commissioner Marshall. , seconded by Commissioner Lloyd , and unanimously approved, the Clerk to the Board was directed to enter into the minutes of the Board the confirmation date, hour, and minutes. Thereupon, the Clerk to the Board entered the confirmation effective 8:20 o'clock p.m. , the 17th day of June, 1986. Upon motion of Commissioner Marshall , seconded by Commissioner Lloyd , and unanimously approved, the Clerk to the Board was directed to deliver a copy of the confirmed Assessment Roll to the Orange County Tax Collector. Upon motion of Commissioner Marshall , seconded by Commissioner Lloyd , and unanimously approved, the Orange County Tax Collector was directed to publish once, a Notice, no earlier than twenty (20) days from the date of confirmation as herein set forth, that the Assessment Roll for the financing by 2 Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road #1195, also known as Meadow Lane, located in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina, has been confirmed and that assessments may be paid without interest at any time before the expiration of thirty (30) days from the day that the Notice is published and that if not paid within that time, all installments thereof shall bear interest in an amount equal to the interest on past due ad valorem taxes in Orange County. The Chair directed that said Notice shall be published in the Durham Morning Herald. Said Notice shall be in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF CONFIRMATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE FINANCING BY ORANGE COUNTY OF THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COSTS OF PAVING NORTH CAROLINA STATE ROAD #1195, ALSO KNOWN AS MEADOW LANE, LOCATED IN CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Notice is hereby given that pursuant to Article 9 of Chapter 153A of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the Board of Commissioners of Orange County has confirmed the Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange Cowl.* of the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road #1195, also known as Meadow Lane, in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina, in toto . The specifics of any adjustment made are in the minutes of the Orange County Board of Commissioners for its meeting on June 17 , 1986. The confirmed Assessment Roll 3 reflects any adjustment. Pursuant thereto: 1. The Board of Commissioners of the County of Orange, North Carolina, met in regular session in the old Post Office in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. on June 17, 1986. 2. The Chair announced that this was the hour and day fixed by the Board of Commissioners for the public hearing on the Preliminary Assessment Roll pursuant to the Board 's decision to finance the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road #1195, also known as Meadow Lane, located in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina. 3. All persons attending and wishing to be heard were recognized by the Chair and were heard. 4. The Board confirmed the Assessment Roll and directed its delivery to the Orange County Tax Collector. 5. The assessments confirmed by the Board may be paid without interest at any time before the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of the publication of this Notice. If not paid within this time, all installments thereof shall bear interest at the rate set for past due Orange County ad valorem taxes. JOHN T. HORNER, Tax Collector for Orange County, N.C. I , Beverly Blythe, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for 4 the County of Orange, North Carolina, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of so much of the proceedings of the Board of Commissioners for said County at a meeting held on June 17, 1986, as relates in any way to the confirmation of the Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road #1195, also known as Meadow Lane, located in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina. BEVERLY BLYTHE, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, N.C. [SEAL] 5 I- r AN ACT TO REQUIRE THE DISCLOSURE OF PROPERTY INTERESTS AND ASSETS BY MEMBERS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AND ALL APPOINTED OFFICIALS Section 1. Every member of the Board of Commissioners and all appointed officials of Orange County shall within thirty (30) days after the effective date of this act or within thirty (30) days after assuming office disclose any legal, equitable or beneficial interest he or his spouse may have in any real property in Orange County which is in the zoning, water and sewer jurisdiction of the Board of County Commissioners of Orange County. This disclosure shall be filed in writing with the Clerk of Superior Court and shall include all real property which any Commission member or appointed official holds title to, individually or jointly, any real property held in trust, as well as any pecuniary interest he may have in any business, firm or corporation of whatever nature, which holds title to or has any ownership interest in any real property within the zoning, water and sewer jurisdiction of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County. Section 2 . Every member of the Board of Commissioners and all appointed officials of Orange County shall disclose any legal, equitable or beneficial ownership interest he may have in any business, firm, or corporation, of whatever nature, which is doing business with Orange County pursuant to contracts which have been awarded by the Board of County Commissioners. Section 3 . Every member of the Board of County Commissioners and all appointed officials shall disclose any legal, equitable or beneficial ownership interest he may have in any business, firm or corporation of whatever nature, which is attempting to secure the award of a bid from the County, prior to the award of any contract. Section 4. The acquisition by any member subject to this act of any legal, equitable or beneficial interest in real property within the zoning, water and sewer jurisdiction of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County shall be disclosed within thirty (30) days after the acquisition of same. Any legal, equitable or beneficial ownership interest which any member has in any business, firm or corporation of whatever nature, with whom Orange County is now doing business, shall be disclosed within thirty (30) days after the effective date of this act or within thirty (30) days after acquisition of the ownership interest. Section 5. Every Board member who has an ownership interest required to be disclosed by this act shall disqualify himself from voting on any matter involving any such ownership interest which comes for official action before the Board of County Commissioners of Orange County. Section 6. Any member who violates any provision of this act shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and may be fined not more than one thousand dollars ($1, 000) or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. Any member who is convicted of a violation of any provision of this act shall forfeit his elected or appointed office, and such office shall be considered vacant as of the date of the final judgment of conviction. Section 7. This act shall become effective upon ratification. A meeting of the Board of Commissioners for Orange County, North Carolina, was held at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, the regular place of meeting, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. on May 20, 1986 . Present: Commissioners Moses Cary, Ben Lloyd, Shirl Marshall and Norman Walker Absent: Don Willhoit, Chair ****************************************************************** The following resolution was read to the Board: FINAL ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION FOR THE FINANCING BY ORANGE COUNTY OF THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COST OF PAVING NORTH CAROLINA STATE ROAD #1195 , ALSO KNOWN AS MEADOW LANE, LOCATED IN CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA WHEREAS the Board of County Commissioners of Orange County has elected to finance the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road #1195, also known as Meadow Lane, located in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, as permitted by North Carolina General Statutes Section 153A-185 (4) and as provided for in North Carolina General Statutes Section 153A-205. IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED THAT: 1. Orange County shall undertake financing of the local share of paving North Carolina State Road #1195, also known as Meadow Lane, in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina. 1 2. That basis for assessment for the local share of the costs of this project shall be frontage abutting the road at an equal rate per foot of frontage. 3. Orange County will assess the total local share according to the basis set out in number 2 above which local share represents approximately ninety-eight percent (98%) of the total project cost. 4. No assessments of this project will be held in abeyance. 5. The assessments shall be paid in the following manner: a. Within thirty (30) days after the notice of confirmation of the assessment role is published, each owner of the property may pay his assessment in full. b. Any assessment not paid in full as provided above shall be paid in five (5) equal annual installments with the first such installment, with interest, due sixty (60) days after the date that the assessment roll is confirmed, and the remaining installments, with interest, due on the same date in each successive year until the assessment is paid in full. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that: The total project cost is $10,754.01 and the amount to be financed and assessed by Orange County is $10,514.01, as follows: 2 Local Costs To Total Be Financed By Costs Orange County Construction Cost $10 ,000 .00 $9,760.00 Legal Services $ 500.00 $ 500.00 Publication costs $ 75.00 $ 75.00 Mailing and other $ 179.01 $ 179.01 Total Project Cost $10,754 .01 $10 ,514.01 The County Manager is hereby directed to prepare a Preliminary Assessment Roll, which roll shall contain a tax description of each lot, parcel or tract of land assessed, the basis for the assessment, the amount assessed against each lot, parcel or tract of land assessed, the terms of payment and the name of the owner of each lot, parcel, or tract as far as can be ascertained from the County tax records. After the Preliminary Assessment Roll is completed, it shall be filed in the office of the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners, there to be available for public inspection until a public hearing is held on the said Preliminary Assessment Roll. A public hearing on the Preliminary Assessment Roll shall be held on June 17 , 1986, at 7 ;30 o'clock during the regular meeting of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, at the old Post Office ► Chapel Hill , North Carolina. 3 The Clerk to the Board of Commissioners is hereby authorized and directed to cause a notice of the public hearing to be given by publication one time, not less than ten (10) days prior to June 17 , 1986, the date set for the hearing, in a newspaper having a general circulation in Orange County. Such notice shall be in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL FILED WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE COUNTY PURSUANT TO THE DIRECTION OF THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AND PURSUANT TO THE BOARD'S DECISION TO FINANCE THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COST OF PAVING NORTH CAROLINA STATE ROAD #1195, ALSO KNOWN AS MEADOW LANE, IN CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Article 9 of Chapter 153A of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the Board of Commissioners of Orange County has completed and filed a Preliminary Assessment Roll. Pursuant thereto: 1. Orange County shall undertake the financing of the local share of paving North Carolina State Road #1195 , also known as Meadow Lane, in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina. The amount to be financed by Orange County is estimated to be Ten Thousand Five Hundred Fourteen and 1/100 Dollars ($10,514 .01) , including costs and attorney' s fees. A portion of the costs of paving the above roads will be borne by the Department of Transportation or the State of North Carolina. 4 2. The Assessment Roll completed is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, and is available to the public for inspection. 3. The Public Hearing will be held at 7 :30 o'clock jp...m. on June 17 , 1986, at the old Post. Office • Chapel Hill , North Carolina, the regular place of meeting for the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, in order to discuss all matters pertaining to the Preliminary Assessment Roll. At the time and place above stated, any resident of Orange County or any other interested person may appear and be heard. Dated, this the 20th day of May , 1986 . BEVERLY BLYTHE, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, N.C. The Clerk to the Board of Commissioners is hereby authorized and directed to cause a notice of the hearing to be mailed by first-class mail to each owner of property as listed on the roll, not less than ten (10) days prior to June 17 1986 , the date set for the hearing. The notice shall be in substantially the following form: 5 NOTICE TO: (owner and property description from assessment roll) SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS' DECISION TO FINANCE AND ASSESS THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COST OF PAVING NORTH CAROLINA STATE ROAD #1195, ALSO KNOWN AS MEADOW LANE, IN CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a public hearing will be held by the Orange County Board of Commissioners on June 17 , 1986, at 7:30 o'clock p .m. , at the old Post Office, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, to discuss all matters pertaining to the subject Preliminary Assessment Roll. The Preliminary Assessment Roll has been filed with the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County at the Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina, and is available for public inspection. Please note that the amount of assessment on the property described in this Notice is $ , as shown on the Assessment Roll on file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina. BEVERLY BLYTHE, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, N.C. The Clerk to the Board of Commissioners is hereby directed to file with the Board of Commissioners a certificate that the notice of the public hearing on the Preliminary Assessment Roll was mailed as directed using a form substantially as follows: 6 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I , Beverly Blythe, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that on or about June 6 , 1986, I mailed, by first-class mail, postage prepaid, a notice to each property owner of the public hearing to be held on the Preliminary Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road #1195, also known as Meadow Lane, located in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina. The notice mailed set the date and time of the public hearing and also the amount of assessment on the property owned by the person to whom the notice was sent according to the county tax records. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, this the 6th day of June , 1986 . BEVERLY BLYTHE, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, N.C. This resolution is effective upon its passage. Thereupon, Commissioner Carey moved the passage of the foregoing resolution and Commissioner Lloyd seconded the Motion, and the resolution was passed by the following vote: 7 Ayes: Unanimous Noes: ****************************************************************** I , Beverly Blythe, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of the proceedings of said Board of Commissioners at a meeting held on May 20, 1986 , so far as the same relate to the Final Assessment Resolution, determination of the project costs and preparation of the Preliminary Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road #1195, also known as Meadow Lane, located in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina, as such proceedings are recorded in the Minute Book. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said Board, this the 20th day of May , 1986 . BEVERLY BLYTHE, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, N.C. [SEAL] 8 COLEMAN, BERNHOLZ, DICKERSON, BERNHOLZ, GLEDHILL & HARGRAVE ATTORNEYS AT LAW 110 CHURTON STREET HILLSBOROTIGHT, N.C. 27278 919-732-2196 919-942-8000 CHAPEL HILL OFFICE SUITE 20,FRANKLIN BUILDING May 22 , 19 8 6 137 E.FRANKLIN STREET CHAPEL HILL,N.C.27514 919-929-7151 ALONZO H.COLEMAN,JR. STEVEN A.BERNHOLZ DONALD R.DICRERSON Ms. Susan J. Smith, Planner ROGER B.BERNHOLZ Orange County Planning Department GEOFFREY E.GLEDHILL g e p DOUGLAS HARGRAVE Orange County Courthouse MARTIN J.BERNHOLZ RICHARD J.SNIDER,JR. 106 E. Margaret Lane JANE G.do G N CHOLASIHERMAN Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 LYNN A.ANDREWS Ol Counse, RE: Meadow Lane - Participatory Paving Project BONNER D.SAWYER (1902-1972) Dear Susan: Enclosed is a copy of the proceedings of the Board of Commissioners for the conduct of the public hearing on the Assessment Roll and the confirmation of the Roll which all should occur on June 17, 1986. I also have enclosed a copy of the certificate of mailing for the Preliminary Assessment Roll delivered to Beverly. Also, by copy of this letter to Mr. Thompson, I am requesting the following two agenda items for the Board's June 17, 1986 , meeting. 1. Public hearing on the Assessment Roll prepared by the County Manager for the Meadow Lane Participatory Paving Project (S.R. 1195) . 2. Will the Board confirm the Assess- ment Roll for the Meadow Lane Participatory Paving Project (S.R. 1195) and direct that it be delivered to the Orange County Tax Collector for collection? Note that the Preliminary Assessment Roll should be filed with the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners not later than June 5, 1986. Very truly yours, A 4F-of4re E. Gledhill GEG/lsg Enclosures cc: Beverly Blythe Kenneth Thompson CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I , Beverly Blythe, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that on or about June 6, 1986, I mailed, by first-class mail, postage prepaid, a Notice to each property owner of the public hearing to be held on the Preliminary Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road #1195, also known as Meadow Lane, located in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina. The Notice mailed set the date and time of the public hearing and also the amount of assessment on the property owned by the person to whom the Notice was sent according to the county tax records. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, this the 6th day of June, 1986 . BEVERLY BLYTHE, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, N.C. A meeting of the Board of Commissioners for Orange County, North Carolina, was held at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, the regular place of meeting, at 7 :30 o'clock p.m. on May 20 , 1986 . Present: Commissioners Moses Carey, Ben Lloyds Shirt Marshall and Norman Walker Absent: Don Willhoit, Chair ****************************************************************** The following resolution was read to the Board: FINAL ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION FOR THE FINANCING BY ORANGE COUNTY OF THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COST OF PAVING NORTH CAROLINA STATE ROAD(S) #1194 AND #1198 , ALSO KNOWN AS ROLLINGWOOD ROAD AND STALLINGS ROAD, LOCATED IN CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA WHEREAS the Board of County Commissioners of Orange County has elected to finance the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road (s) #1194 and #1198 , also known as Rollingwood Road and Stallings Road, located in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, as permitted by North Carolina General Statutes Section 153A-185 (4) and as provided for in North Carolina General Statutes Section 153A-205 . IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED THAT: 1. Orange County shall undertake financing of the local share of paving North Carolina State Road (s) #1194 and #1198, also known as Rollingwood Road and Stallings Road, in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina. 1 2. That basis for assessment for the local share of the costs of this project shall be frontage abutting the road at an equal rate per foot of frontage. 3. Orange County will assess the total local share according to the basis set out in number 2 above which local share represents approximately ninety-nine and one-tenth percent (99 .1%) of the total project cost. 4. No assessments of this project will be held in abeyance. 5. The assessments shall be paid in the following manner: a. Within thirty (30) days after the notice of confirmation of the assessment role is published, each owner of the property may pay his assessment in full. b. Any assessment not paid in full as provided above shall be paid in five (5) equal annual installments with the first such installment, with interest, due sixty (60) days after the date that the assessment roll is confirmed, and the remaining installments, with interest, due on the same date in each successive year until the assessment is paid in full. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that: The total project cost is $20,960.63 and the amount to be financed and assessed by Orange County is $20,768.63, as follows: 2 Local Costs To Total Be Financed By Costs Orange County Construction Costs $20,000.00 $19,808.00 Legal Services $ 500 .00 $ 500.00 Publication costs $ 75 .00 $ 75.00 Mailing and other $ 385.63 $ 385.63 Total Project Cost $20 ,960.63 $20,768.63 The County Manager is hereby directed to prepare a Preliminary Assessment Roll, which roll shall contain a tax description of each lot, parcel or tract of land assessed, the basis for the assessment, the amount assessed against each lot, parcel or tract of land assessed, the terms of payment and the name of the owner of each lot, parcel, or tract as far as can be ascertained from the County tax records. After the Preliminary Assessment Roll is completed, it shall be filed in the office of the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners, there to be available for public inspection until a public hearing is held on the said Preliminary Assessment Roll. A public hearing on the Preliminary Assessment Roll shall be held on June 17 , 1986, at 7:30 o'clock ,m. , during the regular meeting of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, at the old Post Office , Chapel Hill , North Carolina. 3 The Clerk to the Board of Commissioners is hereby authorized and directed to cause a notice of the public hearing to be given by publication one time, not less than ten (10) days prior to June 17 , 1986, the date set for the hearing, in a newspaper having a general circulation in Orange County. Such notice shall be in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL FILED WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE COUNTY PURSUANT TO THE DIRECTION OF THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AND PURSUANT TO THE BOARD' S DECISION TO FINANCE THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COST OF PAVING NORTH CAROLINA STATE ROAD (S) #1194 AND #1198, ALSO KNOWN AS ROLLINGWOOD ROAD AND STALLINGS ROAD, IN CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Article 9 of Chapter 153A of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the Board of Commissioners of Orange County has completed and filed a Preliminary Assessment Roll. Pursuant thereto: 1. Orange County shall undertake the financing of the local share of paving North Carolina State Road (s) #1194 and #1198, also known as Rollingwood Road and Stallings Road, in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina. The amount to be financed by Orange County is estimated to be Twenty Thousand Seven Hundred Sixty-eight and 63/100 Dollars ($20,768.63) , including costs and attorney' s fees. A portion of the costs of 4 paving the above roads will be borne by the Department of Transportation or the State of North Carolina. 2. The Assessment Roll completed is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, and is available to the public for inspection. 3. The Public Hearing will be held at 7 :30 o'clock „p_.m. on June 17 , 1986, at the old Post. Office Chapel Hill , North Carolina, the regular place of meeting for the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, in order to discuss all matters pertaining to the Preliminary Assessment Roll. At the time and place above stated, any resident of Orange County or any other interested person may appear and be heard. Dated, this the 20th day of Mav , 1986 . BEVERLY BLYTHE, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, N.C. The Clerk to the Board of Commissioners is hereby authorized and directed to cause a notice of the hearing to be mailed by first-class mail to each owner of property as listed on the roll, not less than ten (10) days prior to June 17 r 1986, the date set for the hearing. The notice shall be in substantially the following form: 5 NOTICE TO: (owner and property description from assessment roll) SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ' DECISION TO FINANCE AND ASSESS THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COST OF PAVING NORTH CAROLINA STATE ROAD (S) #1194 AND #1198 , ALSO KNOWN AS ROLLINGWOOD ROAD AND STALLINGS ROAD, IN CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a public hearing will be held by the Orange County Board of Commissioners on June 17 , 1986 , at _ 7:30 o'clock p .m. , at the old Post Office, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, to discuss all matters pertaining to the subject Preliminary Assessment Roll. The Preliminary Assessment Roll has been filed with the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County at the Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina, and is available for public inspection. Please note that the amount of assessment on the property described in this Notice is $ , as shown on the Assessment Roll on file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina. BEVERLY BLYTHE, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, N.C. The Clerk to the Board of Commissioners is hereby directed to file with the Board of Commissioners a certificate that the 6 notice of the public hearing on the Preliminary Assessment Roll was mailed as directed using a form substantially as follows: CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I, Beverly Blythe, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that on or about June 6 , 1986, I mailed, by first-class mail, postage prepaid, a notice to each property owner of the public hearing to be held on the Preliminary Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road (s) #1194 and #1198, also known as Rollingwood Road and Stallings Road, located in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina. The notice mailed set the date and time of the public hearing and also the amount of assessment on the property owned by the person to whom the notice was sent according to the county tax records . WITNESS my hand and official seal of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, this the 6th day of June , 1986 . BEVERLY BLYTHE, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, N.C. This resolution is effective upon its passage. Thereupon, Commissioner Lloyd moved the passage of the foregoing resolution and Commissioner Carey 7 seconded the Motion, and the resolution was passed by the following vote: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: ****************************************************************** I , Beverly Blythe, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of the proceedings of said Board of Commissioners at a meeting held on May 20, 1986 , so far as the same relate to the Final Assessment Resolution, determination of the project costs and preparation of the Preliminary Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road (s) #1194 and #1198, also known as Rollingwood Road and Stallings Road, located in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina, as such proceedings are recorded in the Minute Book. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said Board, this the 20th day of May , 1986. BEVERLY BLYTHE, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, N.C. [SEAL] 8 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I , Beverly Blythe, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that on or about June 6, 1986, I mailed, by first-class mail, postage prepaid, a Notice to each property owner of the public hearing to be held on the Preliminary Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road (s) #1194 and #1198 , also known as Rollingwood Road and Stallings Road, located in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina. The Notice mailed set the date and time of the public hearing and also the amount of assessment on the property owned by the person to whom the Notice was sent according to the county tax records. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, this the 6th day of June, 1986 . BEVERLY BLYTHE, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, N.C. 111 ORANGE COUNTY I 71 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agenda ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: JUNE 17, 1986 Item No. SUBJECT: RECYCLING REPORT DEPARTMENT: COUNTY MANAGER PUBLIC HEARING: Yes K No ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: MANAGER'S OFFICE, X501 REPORT TELEPHONE NUMBER: Hillsborough - 732-8181 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 Mebane - 227-2031 Durham - 688-7331 PURPOSE: To receive a copy of the report from the Orange County Solid Waste Task Force. In an effort to extend ks the Task Force has developed uae proposal efor whatE acon Considers to to be a sustainable recycling program for Orange County, Chapel Hill, Carrboro and Hillsborough. It projects 6, 000 tons of waste--in the form of aluminum that l glass ss and to newsprint--could be diverted annually by the program. and IMPACT: Initial start up cost is estimated at $130, 000 with $10, 000 for each year thereafter. Funding for capital is e provided from the landfill reserve whereas the onpgoingeo to be cost would be provided through a surcharge to the per tipping fee. RECOMMENDATION(S) : Refer to the Manager for staff analysis and to bring back a recommendation after conferring with the other representatives of the governing bodies which own and operate the landfill. • Recycling of newspaper, glass, aluminum and materials such as cardboard mixed ' Possibly other will conserve resources, reduce ed paper, and certain plastics of the landfill if it is undertakenlonlansigndificant4scale.. life Background Although the present recycling program was run economically and delivered recyclables for a low cost governmental support. per ton it retieved limited Pport. Other local governments in North Carolina, notably Durham and Charlotte, have given significant support recycling efforts in spite of the fact that these progrswill not make a profit for the city. In Charlotte 's case, it is hoped that recycling of residential solid waste will significantly reduce the city 's waste stream and bu that are about to close. buy extra time for landfills In Durham 's case they support energy conservation and solar projects throughout the City. In the coming FY 1986-87, Durham, working through a non- profit corporation, through local non po hopes to , Sunshares Inc in conjunction with ECOS Inc P collaborate with Orange County 's recycling sharing the capital cost of collection W efforts by year program costs include only �(-r% equipment. Their first trailer and forklift. They are anticipating cost for a truck; will come forward with a level of 9 that Orange County equivalent to theirs. comrrrittment to recycling equc5 ale Durham is considering an expenditure. of to support recycling. They have also committed to a •$60, 0001 comprehensive solid waste study which will examine all aspects of the future of solid waste disposal . This is also something which Orange nd municipalities need to consider while we still uxaury its a ten year lead time. Nationwide there is no residential recycling program that makes a profit. Some curbside pickup Programs have over 70'!. rates but they are still subsidized Partidipstio government. by local and state e If we wish to have a sustainable area wide recycling public funds will be required to initiate it and to subsidize ongoing operation. It will also require support its based groups. The Animal Protection Society has that community h would sponsor and publicize recycling y that Club has also indicated a willingness to he Programs. The Sierra Club recycling in Orange County. involved in promotion of other groups will emerge y With a strong, visible program, especially if, ge to work on sponsorship of recylling, Y , as - was the case in Durham and Wake Counties, they can recieve some benefits from their sponsorship. • UNC has a tremendous opportunity to reduce its waste volume if it builds a refuse derived fuel facility to densify and combust the largest fraction of its waste at the existing power plant. This plant is to be renovated in the next five years. Currently the Possibility of using RDF, even from University wastes alone, is not being considered. Conclusion We hope that the elected officials of this initiative to support a successful recycling will take the aware that recycling by itself can 9 We are all of our waste provide a solution to only ��"/. problem but it is important to begin. action now to avoid a crisis in the next ten years when our current landfill is filled. There are three possible means to funding recycling: 1 .General revenues from each municipality and the county, ;. Funds from the landfill fund surplus to capitaIiz.e the program initially; and •=• A surcharge on the tipping fee now charged sustain the program in the future. 9 at the landfill to This surcharge would generate $65, 0100 per sustain the program and could also fund other year. This would comprehensive solid waste management study. such as a this level of surcharge could Y' duel" five years. capital costs of this not only cover the estimated capital also osssain future expansion first phase of recycling effort to curbside pickup. - 17 ?udget for Recycling Program for Orange County, Chapel Hill, Carrboro and Hillsborough .tee Cost Remarks =iatbed Truck, Trailer $25,000 Assumes new equip. shared Forklift with Durham. 'recessing Center $25,000 Pave existing site :upgrade of existing Construct holding bins for glass & papers :enter at Chapel Hill Erect covered shed 'ublic Works Office) Can be Used for Civic Org. )evelopment of $9,780 Includes screening, landscaping & curbcuts pilot sites at at each site. Assume special use permit apt. complexes may be required at some sites Chapel Hill, Carrboro, Hillsborough redevelopment of $7,600 Reestablish sites in Chapel Hill,.Carrboro & xisitng Public Sites Hillsborough. & Development of Establish New site in Hillsborough and S. of Chapel Hill (Culbreth JHS?) IIwo Additional Sites Includes screening, etc. city & Advertising $11,000 Site (reel newspaper,daGr haners signs at 15 sites = $3400 9 , Newspaper Publicity lx/wk for 1 yr.= 5000 site signs and slide presentation) Door Hangers 2x/ year all residences = 2200 Professional Slide Presentation = $600 Project Management $30,000 Necessary to success of project. (Full time, one year) Includes development of all sites, Management of all construction Management of publicity, legal & admin work Misc.: Ind legal fees, $10,260 Assumes need for special use permits at apartment sites site design Negotiation w/ property owners insurance Liability Liability Insurance, Professional design assistance Subtotal at selected sites $118,640 Contingency a 107. $11,360 TOTAL $130,000 A RESOLUTION REGARDING THE SHEARQN HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT WHEREAS, the Orange County Board of Commissioners is strongly . committed to protecting the general health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Orange County ; and WHEREAS, the Orange County Commissioners have ultimate responsibility for the protection of people and property within Orange County; and WHEREAS, numerous citizens have expressed grave concern over the poten- tial effects the plant could have upon the general health , safety, and welfare of the citizens of Orange County ; and WHEREAS, the ten-mile evacuation planning zone is predicated an a Loss of Coolant Accident rather than a "worst case scenario" and the Chernobyl nuclear disaster indicates the need to restudy the size of the evacuation planning zone ; and WHEREAS, prompt notification of events that may endanger citizens is cru- cial to implementation of effective emergency plans ; and WHEREAS, independent monitoring of the environs of the plant would help to reassure citizens that the plant was operating properly; and WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners wishes to express its grave concern to the Governor , the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Federal Emer- gency Management officials , and Carolina Power and Light over the poten- tial hazardous effects a nuclear power plant and its byproducts may have upon Orange County citizens ; NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED by the Orange County Board of Commis sinners that in the interests of protecting the general health, safety, and welfare of its citizens , the Board does hereby request the ap- propriate authorities institute the following safety measures prior to any licensing, loading, activation, and operation of the Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant : - 1 . That the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Federal Emergency Management Agency extend the required emergency evacuation zone to include Orange County and that the Orange County Emergency Communications center be included in the automatic ringdown system, 2. That Carolina Power and Light and State Emergency Management offi- cials assist Orange County Emergency Management in preparing and testing the evacuation and notification plan subsequent to its approval by the Board of Commissioners , 3. That Carolina Power and Light be required to enter into an agree- ment with an independent qualified research agency to provide both baseline and post plant startup data on air quality in the area. The University of North Carolina at Chapel HiII would be an ideal body to regularly gather, monitor , and publicly and independently report the results of air quality testing to the appropriate federal and state regulatory agencies , the Carolina Power and Light, and A statement from Disabled Persons Opposed to Shearon Harris - Who are we? We are North Carolinians living in this part of the state. - Why are we concerned? Because in the event of a nuclear plant explosion, many persons with disabilities would be in need of special help. - What about emergency plans? We feel very strongly that any plan should be called a "stop-gap" emergency plan or a "pseudo" emer- gency plan. - Reasons it won't work: 1 . Statements from persons at the Three Mile Island disaster re- veal that rescue persons placed rescue of their families above all else. So this means we 'd be saved later -- or not at all. In a study done around the Shoreham plant in New York, a majority of rescue workers indicated that they would NOT STAY AROUND. 2. All plans require that people leave their loved ones in hos- pitals, rest homes, and nursing homes, to be picked up by authorities. This is not human nature. One could not leave a sick child in the hospital, a mother who would give her life for you in a nursing home. 3. If elevators were shut off as part of standard evacuation procedure, many disabled persons would be unable to use stairs. 4. And what if people are not home if an accident happens? Fire- men could risk their lives trying to save people who are not even there. What if persons with disabilities are visiting from other areas? What if telephone lines do not work? What if hundreds of people have the flu, like so many people in the area did last spring? And -- what if persons hard of hearing can't hear the sirens? 5. The quality of life in a shelter would be detrimental to persons with conditions which could require special foods or equipment, such as diabetes, heart conditions, asthma, spinal cord injuries. 6. See comments by Ken Franklin. Please, let's prevent disabilities. And let's not let our grandchildren have birth defects because our children were exposed to radiation. Ken Franklin, President, NC Alliance of Disabled and Concerned Citizens : "I would hope that this plant never opens as a nuclear facility. Officials are making certain assumptions about this situation, but it's their responsibility to protect all the people. In Russia, schoolchildren were evacuated from Kiev, which is 80 miles away. Yet here, the limit is only 10 miles. "I believe very strongly that state officials will not allocate ambulances. In a crisis, these will be elsewhere. And retirement centers and nursing homes don't have group buses as a rule. "Furthermore, there will be no way of getting to a central point to be picked up. I am convinced that an evacuation plan would not work. " Write to: Disabled Persons Opposed to Shearon Harris, Coordinating Office Suite 152, 95 Elliott Rd., Chapel Hill 27514. Donations sincerely appreciated. NORTH CAROLINA ORANGE COUNTY RESOLUTION WHEREAS , Orange County has been experiencing a rapid rate of growth; and WHEREAS, many of the County's public facilities are approaching their capacity to respond to increasing demands; and WHEREAS , the County has identified a need to implement a system of Impact Fees to partially fund the public improvements that will be needed by new development; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Orange County hereby requests that members of its legislative delegation introduce the attached special legislation in the 1986 Session of the General Assembly, to enable the County to establish a system of Impact Fees. This the /7 4 day of :1—fr,,l , 1986. I , Beverly Blythe, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange, North Carolina, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of so much of the proceedings of the Board of Commissioners for said 1 County at a meeting held on .Afi....te 1986, as relates in any way to the resolutidn requesting legislation necessary to implement impact fees. l BEVERLY BL HE, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, N.C. 4SEALI. 2 ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 106 EAST MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGH, N. C. 27278 MOSES CAREY BEN LLOYD SHIRLEY E.MARSHALL NORMAN WALKER DON WILLHOIT June 23 , 1986 Senator Russell Walker 1004 Westmont Drive Asheboro, NC 27203 Dear Senator Walker: At the June 17, 1986 regular meeting of the Board of Commissioners several items were discussed with the Board's preference of support stated and voted thereon. The first of these items gals with the issue of impact fees. After a public hearing in which no Kivate citizen opposition was expressed, the Board adoptedL, a resolution requesting s ecial legislation� in the � sion of the � g P g� e 9$ General Assembly to enable the_Count „ f ,,mss y ,fit h a system of impact fees. ' a Such fees are needed t* ,ap ommodate the Carrboro Land":.w, se Ordinance and, - the •% ; Hill Land Development Ounce=: fn 'th_e `taint Planning • Also they are needed c tyWide ' o it*ate : e '' i : new public {,,;; F , note that facilities on: cti --existing prapesty owriersw,p;;;,;-1' s we have broadened the putpose:far w icb , s could be applied to better fit county `fundtig . •ing school capital and wat ,and e�s r £ " . ► ) . wash."t;ar.::_.,_. tem the Board discussed a A second i he Governor's proposed one-time General Fund transfer to increase highway funding. The Board voted against the proposal indicating that the State should first demonstrate its willingness to fulfill its present responsibility for school current expense funding before adding other purposes for General Fund support. Another item was in support of a disclosure statement for elected officials. The Board approved the attached resolution which was recommended by the Orange County Democratic Party at its convention on April 5, 1986. Senator Russell Walker June 23, 1986 Page 2 In summary the Board hereby solicits your support for the proposed bill which would provide impact fees, your support for not endorsing the General Fund transfer for DOT and your support and endorsement of an act to require the disclosure of property interest and assets by all members of the Board of Commissioners for Orange County. As always, thank you for your continued help. Best Wishes, Don Willhoit Chair /bab File Enclosures COLEMAN, BERNHOLZ, DICKERSON, BERNHOLZ, GLEDHILL & HARGRAVE ATTORNEYS AT LAW 110 CHURTON STREET HILLSBOROUGH, N.C. 27278 919-732-2196 919-942-8000 CHAPEL HILL OFFICE SUITE 20,FRANKLIN BUILDING 137 E.FRANKLIN STREET CHAPEL HILL,N.C.27514 March 13, 1987 919-929-7151 ALONZO B.COLEMAN, JR. STEVEN A.BERNHOLZ DONALD R. DICKERSON ROGER B.BERNHOLZ GEOFFREY E.GLEDHILL DOUGLAS HARGRAVE MARTIN J.BERNHOLZ RICHARD J. SNIDER.JR. G.NICHOLAS HERMAN Ms. Beverly Blythe KAREN J. SHANGRAW o}Coun4c1 Clerk to the Orange County BONNER D.SAWYER Board of Commissioners (1902-1972) 106 East Margaret Lane Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 Re: Impact Fees and Infrastructure Controls Dear Beverly: Enclosed is a copy of a document entitled "AN ACT CONCERNING ORANGE COUNTY. " This document contains legislation approved by the Board which would authorize Orange County to implement impact fees. Per our conversation on March 10, 1987, you will transmit this to our legislative delegation to be presented by the delegation to the General Assembly as a local act. As I mentioned to you on March 10, I expect the County will request additional legislation, either local or general, to fully implement the joint planning process. I met Wednesday (March 11, 1987) with Mike Brough and Ralph Karpinos to review our needs in this regard. Mike Brough is preparing the first draft of the legislative package necessary for joint planning. My hope is that this will be ready for Board consideration on March 24. In that regard the General Assembly has not established a deadline for the introduction of local acts. When transmitting the impact fee legislation to our legislative delegation, I recommend you inform its members that the County held a public hearing on its request for authorization to impose impact fees . I also recommend you send a copy of the minutes of. the Ms. Beverly Blythe Page Two March 13, 1987 meeting during which the public hearing was held so that any public comments can be noted or so that it can be noted that there were no public comments. Very truly yours, / / e•• ey . Gledhill GEG/lsg 5 Enclosure Shir1 Marshall d ac x 0 x w w CC z 0 O z 5 ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 106 EAST MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGH, N. C. 27278 mmcdmImy BSH LLOYD WICRLEY E.MARSHALL NORMAN WALKER DON WII LHO1T June 9, 1986 The Honorable Representative Anne C. Barnes The Honorable Representative Joe Hackney The Honorable Senator Wanda Hunt The Honorable Senator Russell Walker Dear Members of the Orange County Legislative Delegation: At the June 5, 1986, .E egular meeting of the Board of Commissioners discussio as given to joroposed bills to establish the ; or a ng " ` ounty Haz. - ,-.,5's;ss Materials Res p onse Te•,, and,the passel - n a r �` , _ cent ' sales tax. °th c th es e s wou w b enef at the County. ° The 4 . a =. -rige County y �_Hazardous . 0104s, • pq e =��ww •;k ; ide legal standing A : ` J=rh- , m z r tresp• = m. Such standing A , f - needed .1, y 1 � w 1 specialize. ;.n. „r ,'i, . „ , # _. , protection against $ , ,m. The passage of an additional a i"cent sales tax would help lessen the burden placed on the property tax because of the anticipated reductions and/or elimination of Federal Revenue Sharing funds and other funding cuts at the State and/or Federal level, The Board asked that the half cent sales tax be considered with unrestricted use of the revenues so the County could then determine the varied needs of the County and its municipalities. A resolution endorsing the passage of the half cent tax is attached. The Honorable Anne C. Barnes June 9, 1986 Page 2 The Board hereby solicits your support to secure passage of these two bills. Best Wishes, r Don Willhoit Chair /bab File Attachments , . - A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RESPONSE ESTABLISH THE ORANGE ACT TO TEAM• enacts: of North Carolina Orange Assembly established the may The General A hereby whose duties l• There is Team, accident or Materials Response materials Section within any incor- porated Hazardous a hazardous responding i to the territory include here Orange County. emergency anywhere within porated town or be selected the response team may agencies, Members te of or other law enforcement alt Section �• squads now located or serving in city, county, state rescue of selecting the from The manner o Board of County fire departments, and County. Hated by team shall be any part of Orange roved designated the response current shall be apP �'' the members The membe County Commiss o e all times by Commissioners. Board of selected roster shall be maintained membership Manager. ond^ County when respond- ing team, anywhere of the response emergency privi- leges accident o emergency rights, p law Section r materials authority,responding to a within to a hazardous shall have all when resp district, them unit they have the city, This oltio immunities as emergency inside the serve• leges accident or emsrg they normally coverage under worker's violation, limits in which mally benefit limited to► fund laws, death b dis- trict,or territorial but is not or relief the city,shall include, pension a as in serves and is laws, p coverage ally compensation the same There the member norm acts, and territory where have to ed- emp Y team shall life the response protect 4 • Members of necessary to P accident Section acts reasonably materials any to do all scene of a hazardous finials accident in authority at the shall willfully the performance and property Any Person who member engaged �.n punishable by or emergency. response team me of a misdemeanor the days► or with uiltY for m more than manner duties shall be g of his 500, imprisonment a fine of $ his both. performing team member who is per liable for A response shall not from any Section h here in the county shall resulting relates r duties as such anywhere property proximately omission to persons or Pon when the act or damages ggent act or omission • emergency, unless it is accident or emerg of the gross -, a hazardous materials damage occurred because response team negligence wrongdoing of the negligence or intentional member. ordinance by e may y establish orange County ones team. Section 6• operation of the resp proceedures and protocol. for Section 7. This act applies to Orange County only. Section 8. This act is effective upon ratification. / \ A RESOLUTION WHEREAS, counties are in need of an additional revenue source to replace the expected loss of federal revenue sharing and avoid additional reliance on other revenues, such as the property tax; and WHEREAS, such additional revenue sources are needed in Orange County to address major capital projects which are beyond the scope of the. General Fund to support; and WHEREAS, the municipalities of Orange County are facing a similar loss of revenues due to the decline or loss of federal revenue sharing; and WHEREAS, it is expected that full year proceeds from such a tax would yield the following amounts to the County and its several municipalities: Orange County $1,375, 000 Carrboro 175,000 Chapel Hill 540, 000 Hillsborough 46,800 Mebane 7,658 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of Orange County that the legislative delegation is urged to grant authority to counties to levy the tax with unrestricted use of the revenues to meet the varied needs of the County and its municipali- ties. I Don Willhoit, Chair Board of County Commissioners ATTEST: Beverly BYythe, Clerk Board of County Commissioners A RESOLUTION EXPRESSING GRAVE CONCERN OVER THE SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT AND REQUESTING STEPS BE INITIATED TO BETTER INFORM AND PROTECT THE CITIZENS OF CHAPEL HILL FROM ANY EFFECTS OF THE NUCLEAR PLANT (86-6-9/R-1b) WHEREAS, the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill is strongly committed to protecting the general health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Chapel Hill and Orange County; and WHEREAS, emergency management is a primary function of County government and the Town of Chapel Hill strongly and actively supports and participates in emergency and disaster planning on a County-wide basis; and WHEREAS, the pending licensing, loading, activation, and opera- tion of the Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant has the Council gravely concerned over the potential effects the plant would have upon the general health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Chapel Hill and Orange County; and WHEREAS, in 1979, the Council appointed a Citizen's Task Force to assess the effects of the Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant on Chapel Hill; and WHEREAS, the Task Force, comprised of prominent and well-informed citizens of Chapel Hill, after conducting several hearings with experts and the general public over a seven-month period, strongly advocated caution, prudence, and safety in regard to all implications of Chapel Hill' s proximity to the nuclear plant; and WHEREAS, the Council wishes to express its grave concern to the Governor, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, State Emergency Management offi- cials, and Carolina Power and Light over the potential hazardous effects a nuclear power plant and its byproducts may have upon Chapel Hill citizens; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that in the interests of protecting the general health, safety, and welfare of its citizens the Council does hereby request the appropriate authorities institute the follow- ing safety measures prior to any licensing, loading, activation, and operation of the Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant: 1. That the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Federal Emergency Management Agency extend the required nucle- ar power accident emergency zone and emergency notifi- cation system to include the Town of Chapel Hill, 2. That Carolina Power and Light and State Emergency Management officials assist Orange County Emergency Management and Town officials in preparing and testing the evacuation and notification plan subsequent to its approval by the Council, 3. That Carolina Power and Light be required to enter into an agreement with an independent qualified re- search agency to provide both baseline and post plant-operation data on air quality in the area. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill would be an ideal body to regularly gather, monitor, and pub- licly and independently report the results of air quality testing to the appropriate federal and state regulatory agencies, the Carolina and Power and Light Company, and local government officials. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council fully recognizes the potential monetary costs involved in accomplishing the aforementioned steps; however, the Council feels these costs are insignificant when compared with the potential losses that might occur as a result of a nuclear accident. This the 9th day of June, 1986. I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution 86-6-9/R-1B as adopted by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Chapel Hill on the 9th day of June, 1986. Nanc J. W 18, Town Clerk e / SEAL A RESOLUTION ENDORSING THE CONVERSION OF THE SHEARON HARRIS PLANT TO A NON-NUCLEAR FUEL PLANT AND EXPRESSING THE OPPOSITION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL TO THE LICENSING OR OPERATION OF SAID SHEARON HARRIS PLANT ( 86-6-9/R-la) WHEREAS, the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill opposes the movement of nuclear fuel into our region, the licensing and loading of the Shearon Harris reactor, and the activation and operation of the Shearon Harris reactor; and WHEREAS, emergency planning for the Shearon Harris plant does not appear adequate to protect the citizens of the Town of Chapel Hill, and the Town of Chapel Hill is not included in the evacuation plan for a nuclear power accident at Shearon Harris; and WHEREAS, the Town of Chapel Hill would not receive any regular power supply from the Shearon Harris facility; and WHEREAS, the Shearon Harris plant is located within approximate- ly 20 miles of Chapel Hill' s town limits and within a short distance of several major population centers in central North Carolina; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council endorses converting the Shearon Harris plant to a non-nuclear fuel plant to prevent the produc- tion of nuclear waste and to avoid a nuclear power accident occurring in the Triangle area. Further, the Town of Chapel Hill opposes the licensing or operation of the Shearon Harris Nuclear reactor. This the 9th day of June, 1986. I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution 86-6-9/R-1A as adopted by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Chapel Hill on the 9th day of June, 1986. -2](4 Na y J. Wel s Mk ate 4 SEAL r COLEMAN. BERNHOLZ, DICKERSON, BERNHOLZ, GLEDHILL & HARGRAVE ATTORNEYS AT LAW 110 CHURTON STREET HILLSBOROUGH,N.C. 27278 919-732-2196 919-942-8000 CHAPEL HILL OFFICE SUITE 20.FRANKLIN BUILDING 137 5.FRANKLIN STREET CHAPEL HILL.N_C.27514 919-929-7151 May 28, 1986 . ALONZO B.COLEMAN,JR. STEVEN A.BERNHOLZ DONALD R.DICK ERSON ROGER B.BERNHOLZ GEOFFREY E.GLEDHILL _ DOUGLAS HARGRAVE MARTIN J.BERNHOLZ '4 RICHARD J.SNIDER,JR. JANE O.de LISSOVOY Kenneth Thompson G.NICHOLAS HERMAN LYNN A.ANDREWS . Orange County Manager Of Counsel 106 E.- Margaret Lane ,. BONNER D.SAWYER Hillsborough, NC 27278 (1902-1972) Re: Cable Television Franchising in Orange County Dear Ken: This letter is in response to yours dated May 5, 1986 which concerns a request to Orange County by Alert Cable _T.V. of North Carolina, Inc. for an amendment to - its "preexisting permitted use franchise." Some facts you may need to know are as follows: 1. The franchise ordinance granting Alert a pre-- existing permitted use franchise was adopted by Orange County on February 23, 1981. 2. That franchise ordinance imposed no limitations whatsoever on the facilities, equipment or service provided by Alert. - 3. The franchise limits only the number of homes served. Alert may not extend its coverage beyond the homes served by it on November 20, 1980. 4. There is also a limitation in the franchise :� ordinance concerning rates, which must be reasonable. 5. The effective date of Alert's franchise is - . '' May 12, 1982. That is the date that all documentation _s was completed for acceptance of the preexisting -- permitted use franchise. f� . ; 6. Alert's franchise is fifteen years in ,` duration with a ten-year renewal. Kenneth Thompson Page Two May 28, 1986 7 . The ordinance granting a franchise to Village Cable of Orange County, Inc. was adopted on January 26, 1981 . 8. This franchise was accepted by Village and the effective date of the franchise is. February 25, • 1981. 9. The ordinance granting a franchise to Village Cable imposes a number of significant requirements in the area of facilities, equipment and services. All of these requirements are contained in the proposal submitted by Village which proposal is incorporated by - ` r-ef erence into the franchise granted Village. 10. The Village Cable franchise further requires Village Cable to serve all of the unincorporated areas of Orange County according to an extension policy and. required Village Cable to build 160 miles of plant without regard to density within an initial service area and within 18 months of the effective date of the franchise. The franchise granted to Village Cable is also fifteen years in duration with a ten-year renewal. There is no practical way to compare the franchise granted to Village Cable and the franchise granted to Alert Cable T.V. Orange County "grandfathered" Alerts cable operations, having determined that the proposal by Village to serve all of the County was superior in the areas of facilities, equipment, service and extension policy to that proposed by Alert at the time of the initial franchising. It would seem to me that consideration by the Board of County Commissioners of an amendment to the pre-existing permitted use franchise granted Alert, which amendment did nothing more than to extend Alert's territory, creates a fairness question. The capital invested by Village in order to meet the County's franchise requirements was considerable. No such requirement has been imposed on Alert. It seems to me that the only equitable way to ;j consider the request by Alert is for the County to undertake to spell out requirements which have as a ' minimum those requirements imposed on Village Cable. This can be accomplished by a request for proposals following the procedure prescribed in Section IV of the Orange County Cable Television System Ordinance. There may be advantages to Orange County in permitting more than one cable operator to serve all of the unincorporated areas of the County or even in :=4 dividing the territory of the County. However, the Y a Kenneth Thompson Page Three May. 28, 1986 same or comparable requirements should be made on all .t such cable operators. 4. Very truly yours, ,, ia. G offr E. Gledhill iGEG/lsg F-14:i cc: Moses Carey Ben Lloyd 9 Shirl Marshal Norman Walker 5 Don Willhoit, Chair Orange County Board ,; of Commissioners ::i 2 s 1 I 1 ':.1 1 I ;1 1 FORM LEC - 1-A December, 1985 STATEMENT OF ECONOMIC INTEREST CANDIDATES FOR THE- GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF 'NORTH CAROLINA • Name of Candidate Home Address Legislative Seat Sought : Senate District House ;District Every candidate for the 1987 General Assembly of North Carolina, however selected , must file this statement with the County Boards of Election . 6 s PART I 1AKES AND OCCUPATIONS OF CANDIDATE AND MEMBERS OF IMMEDIATE HOUSEHOLD List below vour name. spouse's name. and names of all children claimed by you as dependents for Federal Income Tax purposes. NATURE OF BUSINESS TYPE OF CUSTOMERS OR NAME ELII'LO1ER OR PROFESSION CLIENTELE SERVED Candidate Spouse Dependent Children) ' -2- e PART II BUSINESSES WITH WHICH ASSOCIATED For purposes of this Part, in determining whether or not an enterprise is doing business in North Carolina, you may rely upon the list and latest supplement of Taxable Percentages For N. C. Income and Intangibles Tax Purposes issued by the N. C. Department of Revenue, Intangibles Tax Division, Raleigh, N. C. 27640. An unincorporated enterprise is doing business in North Carolina if it maintains a place of business in the state or has assigned representatives who regularly solicit business in the state. List below every business enterprise, incorporated or otherwise, doing business in North Carolina of which you, Your spouse, or dependent child A. is a director, officer, owner, partner or employee (do not list in Section A ownership of stock; stock ownership should be reported in Sections B and C of this Part) Individual Name of Business [Candidate, Spouse or Type of Association Dependent Child] -- F irector, Officer, etc. If ore- than one type of association xists, list all that apply] R. individually or collectively own as of the time of the filing of this report stocks, bonds or debentures of any type worth $5,000 or more at fair market value as of. December 31, 1985. Individual Nance of Business C. individually or collectively own more than 5% of the total stock outstanding . , Individual(s) Name of Business owning stock " PART III BUSINESS WITH THE STATE List below any of the enterprises listed in Part II which you know or have reason to believe does business . with the State of North Carolina. For purposes of this Part, an enterprise does business with the State if: (1) It provides, or seeks to provide, services or equipment, materials or supplies to the State or one of its departments, agencies or institutions on a regular, continuing or periodic basis; or (2) It is listed by the Office of Purchase and Contract, N. C. Department of Administration, as a source of equipment, materials and 'supplies under "State Contract"; or (3) It produces, manufactures or distributes equipment, materials or supplies intended ultimately for State Government consumption, even though it makes no sales directly to the State. Incidental retail sales on a "walk-in" basis to State agencies, institutions and departments, does not constitute doing business with the State. Name of Business Nature of Business Done With State -5- PART IV REAL ESTATE INTERESTS ' List below all real estate, other than your personal residence, located' in North Carolina, having a fair market value in excess of $5,000, in which you, your spouse or dependent child has any beneficial interest (including an option to buy or a lease for 10 years or longer). If your personal residence is part of a larger tract such as a farm, exclude the residence and that part of the surrounding land used for family purposes (lawn, garden, garage, etc.), and then list the remainder of the tract. • Character of Real Estate Location j . Type of Interest , _ _ (owner, lessee, etc.) -6- • • PART V CREDITORS • List below the type of each creditor to whom you, your spouse, or dependent child- owes more then $5,000. Do not list indebtedness secured by lien on your personal residence only. Describe creditor by type, not by name, Type of Creditor Individual Debtor (Commercial Bank, Individual, (Candidate, Spouse, Dependent Child) Credit Union, etc.) PART VI VESTED TRUSTS List below the name of each vested trust, including profit--sharing trusts and retirement trusts of any type, in which you, your spouse, or dependent child has a financial interest in excess of $5,000. Individual Having Interest Name of Trust or Trustee (Candidate, Spouse, Dependent Child) -7- • PART VIr PROFESSIONAL CLIENTS ti If you derive income from the practice of a profession, either individually or as a member of a professional association, list below' the clients, (e.g. , insurance companies, public utilities, financial institutions) by type of business, whom you charged or who paid you, your firm or partnership $2;500 or more for services re.ttdered during the calendar year 1985. 'Identification by type of business is sufficient; you need not identify clients by name. Client Described Nature of Services by Type of Business Rendered • [e.g. trials, lobbying, General Counsel, Retainer, title work, probate, etc. ] i • I certify that I have examined carefully the information contained in this r that it is true and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief_ report, and This day of 19 7719..tg."•":4" ) • • Part 2. Statement of Economic Interest. § 120-89. Statement of economic interest by legislative .candidates; filing required. Every person who files as a candidate for nomination or election to a seat in either house of the General Assembly shall file a statement of economic inter- est as specified in this Article within 10 days of the filing deadline for the office he seeks. (1975, c. 564, s. 1.) § 120-90. Place and manner of filing. The statement of economic interest shall cover the preceding calendar year and shall be filed at the same place, and in the same manner, as the notice of candidacy which a candidate seeking party nomination for the office of State Senator or member of the State House of Representatives is required to file under the provisions of G.S. 163-106. (1975, c. 564,s. 1.) § 120-91. Certification of statements of economic interest. The chairman of the county board of elections with which a statement of economic interest is filed shall forward a certified copy of the statement to the State Board of Elections and the offices to which copies of the notice of candidacy filed by'a candidate seeking party nomination for the office of State Senator or member of the State House of Representatives is required to be forwarded under the provisions of G.S. 163-108. (1975, c. 564, s. 1.) § 120-92. Filing by candidates not nominated in primary elections. • A person who is nominated pursuant to the provisions of G.S. 163-114 after the primary and before the general election, and a person who qualifies pur- suant to the provisions of G.S. 163-122 as an independent candidate in a general election shall file with the county board of elections of each county in the senatorial or representative district a statement of economic interest. A person nominated pursuant to G.S. 163-114 shall file the statement within three days following his nomination, or not later than the day preceding the general election, whichever occurs first. A person seeking to qualify as an independent candidate under G.S. 163-122 shall file the statement of economic interest with the petition filed pursuant to that section. A person elected - pursuant to G.S. 163-11 (vacancy in office) shall file a statement of economic interest within 10 days after taking the oath of office. (1975, c. 564, s. 1.) § 120-93. County boards of elections to notify candidates of economic-interest-statement requirements. Each county board of elections shall provide for notification of the economic-interest-statement requirements of G.S. 120-95 and 120-96 to be given to any candidate filing for nomination or election to the General Assem- bly at the time of his or her filing in the particular county. (1975, c. 564,s. 1.) § 120-94. Statements of economic interest are public records. The statements of economic interest are public records and shall be made available for inspection and copying by any person during normal business hours at the office of the various county boards of election where the statements or copies thereof are filed. If a county board of elections of a county does not keep an office open during normal business hours each day, that board shall deliver a copy of all statements of economic interest filed with it to the clerk of superior court of the county, and the statements shall be available for inspection and copying by any person during normal business hours at that clerk's office. (1975, c. 564, s. 1.) • •§ 120-95. Legislators to file statement of economic interest with Legislative Services Officer. Every member of the General Assembly,however selected,shall by January 15 next following his election file a statement of economic interest with.the Legislative Services Officer of the General Assembly:A copy of the statement so filed shall be placed in the Legislative Library and shall be available for inspection and copying by any person during normal library hours.-On or before December 16 of the year members of the General Assembly are elected, the Legislative Services Officer shall cause notice of the filing requirement of this section to be mailed to all elected members of the General Assembly.(1975, c. 564, s. 1.) - § 120-96. Contents of statement. Any statement of economic interest filed under this Article shall be on a form prescribed by the Committee,and the person filing the statement shall supply the following information: (1) The identity, by name, of any business with which he, or any member of his immediate household, is associated; (2) The character and location of all real estate of a fair market.value in excess of five thousand dollars($5,000), other than his personal resi- dence(curtilage),in the State in-which he,or a member of his immedi- ate household, has any beneficial interest, including an option to buy and a lease for 10 years or over; (3) The type of each creditor to whom he, or a member of his immediate household, owes money,except indebtedness secured by lien upon his personal residence only, in excess of five thousand dollars ($5,000); (4) The name of each"vested trust" in which he or a member of his imme- diate household has a financial interest in excess of five thousand dollars ($5,000) and the nature of such interest; (5) The name and nature of his and,his immediate household member's respective business or profession 'or employer and the types of customers and types of clientele served; (6) A list of businesses with which he is associated that do business with the State, and a brief description of the nature of such business; (7) In the case of professional persons and associations,a list of classifica- tions of business clients which classes were charged or paid two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) or more during the previous calendar year for professional services rendered by him, his firm or • partnership.This list need not include the name of the client but shall list the type of the business of each such client or class of client, and brief description of the nature of the services rendered. (1975, c. 564, s. 1.) 120-97. Updating statements. Each person who is required to file a statement of economic interest under this Article shall file an updated statement at the office required by this Article by January 15 of the second year following his or her election on a form prescribed by the Legislative Ethics Committee.The Committee shall forward the form to those required to file same on or before December 16. (1975,c. 564, s. 1.) 120-98. Penalty for failure to file. (a) In the case of a candidate, if the statement of economic interest required by this Article is not filed when required herein, the county board of elections shall immediately notify the candidate that his name will not be placed on the ballot unless the statement is received within 15 days. If the statement is not received within 15 days, the candidate shall be disqualified and his filing fee returned. (b) In the case of a member, willful failure to file shall result in that mem- ber's not being allowed to take the oath.of office or enter or continue upon his duties or receive any compensation from public funds provided, however, the Committee may, for good cause shown, allow said member to file the required statement and remove his disability. (1975, c. 564, s. 1.) • ©°D°° CITY OF DURHAM DP'pF DUR�aa 1.4i10/ NORTH CAROLINA a 18 69; °' �yO A CENTRAL PIEDMONT ®p/1J�ApQ�'0© EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING OFFICE � 211 RIGSBEE AVENUE CITY OP` MEDICINE August 25, 1986 POST OFFICE BOX 667 DURHAM,NC 27702 PHONE 919/683-4121 Ms. Beverly A. Blythe, Clerk Orange County Board of Commissioners 106 E. Margaret Lane Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 Dear Beverly: Please find attached, fully executed copies of amendments to the Central. Piedmont Employment and Training Consortium and Private Industry Council/Chief Elected Official Agreements for your files. If you have any questions regarding this matter please don't hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your continued cooperation. Sincerely, 2550;e' Robert Ferguson Director RF:h Attachments r AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER y - y_ NORTH CAROLINA AMENDMENT TO CONSORTIUM AGREEMENT DURHAM COUNTY This is an Amendment to an Agreement among the County of Durham (hereinafter "Durham County" ) , the County - of Orange . (hereinafter "Orange County" ) and the City of Durham (hereinafter "City" ) . The date of this Amendment is June 23 , 1986 . WITNESSETH: WHEREAS , Durham County, Orange County and the City entered into an Agreement on June 29 , 1984 to establish a Consortium to plan and operate a multi-jurisdictional program under the Job Training Partnership Act (hereinafter "Consortium Agreement" ) ; the Consortium Agreement is incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, Durham County , Orange County and the City have each agreed to an Amendment to the Consortium Agreement, as set forth in this instrument; NOW , THEREFORE , Durham County, Orange County and the City agree as follows : 1 . The June 30, 1986 expiration date provided for in Section VIII of the Consortium Agreement is extended for a period of two years to and including June 30 , 1988. 2. Except as herein amended, the Consortium Agreement shall be and remain in full force and effect. Durham County, Orange County and the City have each authorized this Amendment to Consortium Agreement to be duly executed under seal. , COUNTY bURH I .ATTEST: By �I IL `; ---tai, Cha . o the Board of Commissioners as Chief 3=°= ter-in) Elected Official - - _ William V. Bell COUNT OF ORANGE ATTEST: B (n 4 6117-42...4X y V, Chairman of the Board of Commissioners as Chief Elected Clerk Official Don Willhoit CITY OF D • ATTEST: _ ByCi t � _ y - nager for Chief At.. /� `ir. i pad,134 Elected Official C ' y Clerk apEOURyk to 6BI a 2 NORTH CAROLINA ./.1% f 2Qp DURHAM COUNTY ©m HCkq C't/dmdq T s is t certify that on this day personally came before me (Zyk ;C , with whom I. am personally• acqua ' ted, w'ho, being by me duly sworn, says that ,y • is the Chairman of the Board of Co Ilissioner: for the County of Durha d that he, said 4_4/ is the er o the Board of Coj'missfoners for the County of Durham, a body politic and c! rporate, described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the common seal of said County of Durham; that the seal affixed to said instrument is said common seal; that the name of the County of Durham was subscribed thereto by the said Chairman of the Board of Commissioners for the County of Durham and that the said Chairm the Board of Commissioners for the County of Durham and sai er o the Board of Commissioners for the County of Durham subscribed their names thereto and said common seal was affixed, all by order of the Board of Commissioners for the County of Durham, and that said instrument is the act and deed of said County of Durham. Witness my hand and notarial seal, this the 524 0240Sr�►f , 19 g'('p . ,oese•p P. L+yn��+*, • Notary Public �'"-' • Ry . My commission expires • 1 PUBLIC /0. a• ••• •• • .;c COU01 .■■`% NORTH CAROLINA ORANGE COUNTY This is to certify that on this day personally came before me Beverly A. Blythe , with whom I am personally acquainted, who, being by me duly sworn, says that Don Willhoit is the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange and that she, said Beverly A. Blythe is the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange, a body politic and corporate, described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that she knows the common seal of said County of Orange; that the seal affixed to said instrument is said common 'I . seal; that the name of the County of Orange was subscribed thereto by the said Chairman of the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange and that the said Chairman of the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange and said Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange subscribed their names thereto and said common seal was affixed, all by order of the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange , and that said instrument is the act and deed of said County of Orange . Witness my hand and notarial seal, this the 10th day of July , 19 86 . C6�ytCaara8sp7� Xiffr rAll 5J� b411. A sK`L ✓ A,44, a '>'1, Notary Public 4 c�n�.`�i;;' '. J' ._ My commission expires 4 . December 10, 1990 c '" C e 11 1 PUBL\C � ;) o �. NORTH CAROLINA DURHAM COUNTY his is��CA rf� that on this day personally came before _ n me 4J3_. , with whom I am personally acquain d, who being by me duly sworn, says that Orville W. Powell is the City Manager, and that she the said _y(, 134,, u7 4 _ is the City Clerk of the City of Durham, the municipal corporation named within and which executed the foregoing instrument; that she knows the common seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said instrument is said common seal; that the name of the corporation was subscribed thereto by the said City Manager and that the said City Manager and said City Clerk subscribed their names thereto and said common seal was affixed, all by order of the City Council of the City of Durham and that said instrument is the act and deed of said corporation. �� Witness my hand and notarial seal, this the /c day of (2 . , 19 86., . 1°A41-71-Nott /t. .My commission expires Public ``,,`,,,,,,,�►r �� • w)1 A Rr * o\ I-08 U C o� x ...41i cOU�A'Nm % ',...i l II rlll....,, f RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF DURHAM COUNTY TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO THE CENTRAL PIEDMONT EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING CONSORTIUM AGREEMENT WITH ORANGE COUNTY AND THE CITY OF DURHAM FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXTENDING THE TERMINATION DATE TO JUNE 30, 1988. WHEREAS, the United States Co egress enacted the Job Training Partner- ship Act in order to provide job training and employment opportunities for economically disadvantaged and unemployed persons; and WHEREAS, under the Act units of local governments are encouraged to form consortia to carry out employment and training services; and WHEREAS, the Counties of Durham, and Orange and the City of Durham have formed such a Consortium; and WHEREAS, the Chairman is authorized to execute all documents on behalf of the County for Job Training Partnership Act purposes; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE DURHAM COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS: The Chairman is directed to execute an amendment to the Central Piedmont Employment And Training Consortium Agreement for the purpose of extending the termination date to June 30, 1988. BY ORDER OF THE DURHAM COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS THIS THE 23rd DAY OF JUNE , 1986. RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE COUNTY TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING CONSORTIUM AGREEMENT WITH DURHAM COUNTY AND THE CITY OF DURHAM FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXTENDING.THE TERMINATION DATE TO JUNE 30, 1988. WHEREAS, the United States Congress enacted the Job Training Partner- ship Act in order to provide job training and employment opportunities for economically disadvantaged and unemployed persons; and WHEREAS, under the Act units of local governments are encouraged to form consortia to carry out employment and training services; and WHEREAS, the Counties of Durham, and Orange and the City of Durham have formed such a Consortium; and WHEREAS, the Chairman is authorized to execute all documents on behalf of the County for Job Training Partnership Act purposes; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS: The Chairman is directed to execute an amendment to the Employment And Training Consortium Agreement for the purpose of extending the termination date to June 30, 1988. BY ORDER OF THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS THIS THE P7T N DAY OF j lime_ , 1986. - SEAL f� Attest: r �_!/ / Clerk �� 1 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING CONSORTIUM AGREEMENT WITH DURHAM AND ORANGE COUNTIES FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXTENDING THE TERMINATION DATE TO JUNE 30, 1988. WHEREAS, .the United States Congress enacted the Job Training Partnership Act in order to provide job training and employment opportunities for economically disadvantaged and unemployed persons; and WHEREAS, under the Act units of local government are encouraged to form consortia to carry out employment and training services; and WHEREAS, the Counties of Durham, and Orange and the City of Durham have formed such a Consortium; and WHEREAS, the City Manager is authorized as signatory official . of Job Training Partnership Act Documents for the designated Chief Elected Official; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE DURHAM CITY COUNCIL: The City Manager is directed to execute an amendment to the Employment and Training Consortium Agreement for the purpose of extending the termination date to June 30, 1988. BY ORDER OF THE DURHAM CITY COUNCIL THIS THE 28th DAY OF July , 1986 z. e§uuR; o APPROVED SY oe:;`r CITY COUNGIL e3 I i g 08 6g a l4. JUL 28 100 k:30-Le-Ain CITY ERY NORTH CAROLINA AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PRIVATE INDUSTRY DURHAM COUNTY COUNCIL/CHIEF ELECTED OFFICIALS This is an Amendment to an Agreement between the Central Piedmont Employment and Training Private Industry Council (hereinafter "Council") and the Chief Elected Officials (or authorized signatory officials) as authorized representatives of the County of Durham, County of Orange and City of Durham (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Chief Elected Officers") . The date of this Amendment is June 23 1986 . WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on June 29 , 1984, the Council and Chief Elected Officials entered into an Agreement pertaining to, among other things , the development and implementation of a job training plan pursuant to the Job Training Partnership Act (hereinafter "Agreement" ) ; the Agreement is incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS , the Council and Chief Elected Officials have each agreed to an Amendment to Agreement, as set forth in this instrument; NOW, THEREFORE , the Council and Chief Elected Officials agree as follows: 1 . The June 30 , 1986 expiration date provided for in Section VI of the Agreement is hereby extended for a period of two years to and including June 30 , 1988 . 2. Except as herein amended, the Agreement shall be and remain in full force and effect. CENTRAL PIEDMONT EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL Witness Ch - rma. Barney Wes COUNTY 0 / )URHA LAST: _�- By /../�/ 11 . . Ch . i '"en o t e :oard of .1 ' - Commissioners as Chief =Cler r' Jh�teri P Elected Official - William V. Bell ■ = COUNTY OF ORANGE ATTEST. By l '.` W1 A j441 Chairman of the Board of Commissioners as Chief Elected Clerk Official Don Willhoit CITY OF Ul) h!► / 2 ATTEST: E;,„ f;,2�ci,By fiZQ 4 7 o©y0i uF=�;`7,1,pCity anager for Chief .1_i �a /*Alf "pi�r 9� �cElected Official City Clerk r 1g 6 s a Q0d NORTH CAROLINA . DURHAM COUN Y I , a.C-f.L- t , Notary Public in and for the above named County and State do hereby certify that the due execution the foregoing instrument was duly acknowledged before me by .�2 if/ /4/4� as Chairman of Central Piedmont Employment and Training Private Industry Council for the purposes therein expressed. itness my hand and notarial seal, this the (5..?;7 day of , 19j . AZ-y_4,--t..L./ (,;- .44---6-e--1 Notary Public My commission expires NORTH CAROLINA DURHAM COUNTY is is o certif that on this day personally came before me , with whom I am personally a qu- 'nAryl, who, being by me duly sworn, says that '� // is the Chairman of the Board of • iss o • s for the County of Durha d' that he, said dri.G. .i_ . , it/I . r is theme to the Board of C. mis f oners for the County of Durham -�� , a body 'politic and c• rpor' te, described in and which executed the foregoing ' instrument; that he knows the common seal of said County of Durham; that the seal affixed to said instrument is said common seal; that the name of the County of Durham was subscribed thereto by the said Chairman of the Board of Commissioners for the County of Durham and that the said Chairman of, the Board of Commissioners for the County of Durham and said the Board of Commissioners for the County of Durham subscribed their names thereto and said common seal was affixed, all by order of the Board of Commissioners for the County of Durham, and that said instrument is the act and deed of said County of Durham. Witness my hand and notarial seal, this the ItO1•trifysgf , 19 . P• c/i ••. 4.A'Pi . , ,,, C� : c*i_. . S�J Notary Pub1z.c f Ai } commission expires / Ai," . ..• p\ PUBLIC /' (';I..1.1,1,.%••••a...•.• J, .,•' 6,E••'• COUNT- .. • .e.....N NORTH CAROLINA ORANGE COUNTY .,p�This is to n certify hat on this day personally came before me .V _ Q1 , with whom I am personally 'Tainted, o,. bein by me duly sworn, says that . 1.1.3 L —4-C is the Chairman of the Board of Commissioner fQr the County of Orange and that she, said In ( k is the Clerk to the Board of Commissio ers for t e County of Orange , a body politic and , corporate, described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that she knows the common seal of said County of Orange; that the seal affixed to said instrument is said common seal; that the name of the County of Orange was subscribed thereto by the said Chairman of the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange and that the said Chairman of the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange and said Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange subscribed their names thereto and said common seal was affixed, all by order of the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange, and that said instrument is the act and deed of said County of Orange. Witness my hand and notarial seal, this the /O M day of -"Al , 19 g4, p,��,tn.nr Na otr Pu lic . if 1. CL�ti!e�. ; commission expires y �E`� NOYARY �/' p 0 10 PUEL\C ?, : 1.4'4 . coup•I .�,'1-Osselesstil NORTH CAROLINA ■ DURHAM COUNTY his is to certify that on this day personally came before me ,e7 })/(,. c ute.4., i, with whom I am personally acquainted, who being by me duly sworn, says that Ory lle W Powell i the City Manager, and that she the said `7](_• Qp�JA� is the City Clerk of the City of Durham, the municipal corporation named within and which executed the foregoing instrument; that she knows the common seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said instrument is said common seal; that the name of the corporation was subscribed thereto by the said City Manager and that the said City Manager and said City Clerk subscribed their names thereto and said common seal was affixed, all by order of the City Council of the City of Durham and that said instrument is the act and deed of said corporation. ,Ij , Witness my hand and notarial seal, this the /�-�" day of A-1.,6/.4.4Z7 , 19 c0(o . c--,?p.jtt,-- CC.). ‘ 92/0,.,r Notcy aP,4,b+4�►R�� My commission expires L`.`. \NY A. '',,, 1 • NOTA Ry *** • •• PUBLIC LEASE AGREEMENT COPy RENEWAL nQRTH CAROLINA ORANGE COUNTY WHEREAS , A lease agreement was made and entered into as of the 5th day of July, 1985 by and between Efland Rescue Unit and Efland Volunteer Fire Company, Inc. , LESSOR Party of the First Part, and Orange County, LESSEE , Part of the Second Part, for premises known as the Efland Rescue Unit Building in Efland, North Carolina. WHEREAS , the LESSOR and the LESSEE wish to renew the lease agreement. NOW THEREFORE , LESSOR and LESSEE mutually agree to the following: (1) The lease agreement will be continued for a period of one year commencing on July 1, 1986 and terminate at 12: 00 midnight on June 30, 1987. (2) All other terms and conditions will remain the same. This agreed to, the / l0 day of ,/f/-y 1986. Party of the First Part: BY: `1 xt� 1z- -z-p W.C. Dawkins for Efland Rescue Unit and Efland Volunteer Fire Co. , Lessor BY: Jer Wil er, for Efland Rescue Unit and Efland Volunteer Fire Company, Lessor Party if the Seco d P rt: BY: `: Vl! ` Don Willhoit, Chair Orange County Board of Commissioners NORTH CAROLINA LEASE ORANGE COUNTY ' This lease contract, made this the 57V-day of July, 1985, by and between EFLAND RESCUE UNIT and EFLAND VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY, INC. a North Carolina Corporation, Lessor, Party of the First Part, and ORANGE COUNTY, Lessee, Party of the Second Part; W I T N E S S E T H: That the Lessor hereby demises unto the Lessee the premises 5 known as the EFLAND RESCUE UNIT BUILDING in Efland, North Carolina and more particularly described as follows: 3 ✓BEGINNING at Curtis W. Brown's Southeast corner in a the public road on South side of Southern Railway in Efland, N.C.; thence along said public road 106 feet to a corner in the public road, this being John Efland, Jr. Northeast corner; thence West along John Efland, Jr. line 200 feet to a stake; § thence North 106 feet to a stake Efland and Brown's ° corner; thence East along Brown's line 200 feet to r the BEGINNING CORNER, containing one-half acre more a or less. The corner stakes for the corners in the road are set back 10 feet in the line from the W corner in the public road. � Y This lease is executed upon the following terms and O conditions: a 1. The Lessee agrees to pay rent of $1.00 for the term. 8 The term shall be for one year with an option to renew for an additional one year term. 2. This lease shall not be assigned, nor the leased premises sublet, without the written consent of the Lessors. 3. All repairs shall be made by the Lessee, it being understood and agreed that the premises are being demised as they now -1- x stand, without obligation on the part of the Lessors to make repairs or improvements. 4. Lessee may remodel or renovate the premises and make any improvements desired consistent with the operation of the premises as a rescue unit building. Prior notice of all remodelling, renovation and improvements shall be given to Lessors and written permission must be obtained. 5. The Lessee covenants and agrees that it will take good care of the premises and upon the termination of this lease will surrender the said premises in as good order and condition as at the beginning of this lease, ordinary wear and tear excepted and that they a will make no unlawful or offensive use of the premises. 2 6. If during the term of this lease the leased premises are so damaged by fire, tornado, or other catastrophe or casualty as to a render the same uninhabitable, this lease shall terminate. In TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands and seals, this the day and year first above written. O PARTY OF THE FIRST PART: W. C. DAWKINS EFLAND RESCUE UNIT and EFLAND VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY, Lessor JERRY' ILDE% for EFLAND RESCUE UNIT and • EF VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY, Lessor PARTY THE SECOND PART: By: DON ILLHOIT, CnAZr . ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS -2- FILE COPY The Village Companies 88 McClamroch Circle•P.O. Box 3300•Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27515.9191988.4811 Robert E.Woodruff Vice President and Controller June 24, 1986 Ms. Pam Jones Orange County Purchasing 300 W. Tryon Hillsborough, NC 27278 Dear Pam: This will confirm our conversation concerning the Fourth of July. The Kiwanis Club is covered under the liability policy of Kiwanis International which policy is in excess of $1,000,000. If you have further questions, please let me know. Best regards, /X 1 Robert E. Woodruff REW/kab A RESOLUTION REGARDING THE SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT WHEREAS, the Orange County Board of Commissioners is strongly committed to protecting the general health, safety , and welfare of the citizens of Orange County; and WHEREAS, the Orange County Commissioners have ultimate responsibility for the protection of people and property within Orange County ; and WHEREAS, numerous citizens have expressed grave concern over the poten- tial effects the plant could have upon the general health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Orange County ; and WHEREAS, the ten-mile evacuation planning zone is predicated an a Loss of Coolant Accident rather than a "worst case scenario" and . the Chernobyl nuclear disaster indicates the need to restudy the size of the evacuation planning zone ,' and WHEREAS, prompt notification of events that may endanger citizens is cru- cial to implementation of effective emergency plans ; and WHEREAS, independent monitoring of the enuirons of the plant would help to reassure citizens that the plant was operating properly ; and • WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners wishes to express its grave concern to the Governor, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission; the Federal Emer- gency Management officials , and Carolina Power and . Light over the poten- tial hazardous effects a nuclear power plant and its byproducts may have upon Orange County citizens ; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Orange County Board of Commis- :, sioners that in the interests of protecting the general health; safety ; and welfare of its citizens ; the Board does hereby request the ap- ?. propriate authorities institute the following safety measures prior to any licensing, loading; activation; and operation of the Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant : • 1 . That the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Federal Emergency Management Agency extend the required emergency evacuation zone to include Orange County and that the Orange County Emergency Communications center be included in the automatic ringdawn system, 2. That Carolina Power and Light and State Emergency Management offi- cials assist Orange County Emergency Management in preparing and testing the evacuation and notification plan subsequent to its approval by the Board of Commissioners , 3. That Carolina Power and Light be required to enter into an agree- ment with an independent qualified research agency to provide both baseline and post plant startup data on air quality in the area . The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill would be an ideal body to regularly gather , monitor , and publicly and independently report the results of air quality testing to the appropriate federal and state regulatory agencies , the Carolina Power and Light, and local government officials , BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Orange County Board of Commissioners that the Board fully recognizes the potential monetary costs involved in ac— comp Iisk ng the aferementioned steps ; however , the Board feels these. costs are i ns i gn i f i cant when compared with the potential l asses •that might occur as a result of a nuclear accident . AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,- the Orange County Board of Commissioners i n-- tends to establish a "blue—ribbon" task force to advise on development of . and appropriate emergency response plan far Orange County. This resolution was passed unanimously by the Orange County Board of Commissioners on June. 17, 1986 with the addition of the following amendment,: • - . �.. That Carglina Power and Light be requested to do a study for conversion of the Shearon Harris Nuclear Plano o nonnuclear fuel use and that this study be made available to the general public.- -. • • • • • • • • • ZAS PROPOSED BY C.A.S.H. (Coatliton for Alternatives to Shearon Harris) RESOLUTION REQUESTING INCLUSION OF ORANGE COUNTY IN SHEARON HARRIS EVACUATION PLAN Whereas regulations of the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) require official evacuation plans only for communities within a ten-mile radius of nuclear power plants in the event of an accident, and yet recent accidents at the nuclear power plants at Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania and at Chernobyl in the Ukraine, USSR, have demonstrated that the risks to human, animal, and plant life exposed to harmful levels of radiation extend far beyond a ten-mile radius, and Whereas Orange County and its citizens are mainly located within twenty- to-forty miles of the proposed Shearon Harris nuclear power plant and are there- for at risk, with prevailing winds in our direction one day out of five, of exposure to harmful levels of radiation in the event of a major accident at Shearon Harris, and Whereas the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has announced that, in the coming years, there is a fifty-fifty chance of an accident similar to the one at Chernobyl occuring at a reactor in the United States, and Whereas NRC records show that Carolina Power and Light, the utility that would operate the Shearon Harris plant, has one of the worst safety records of any utility company in the United States, thereby increasing the likelihood of an accident at its Wake County nuclear power plant, and Whereas the Wake County Sheriff's Department has concluded that problems of drug abuse during construction of Shearon Harris were widespread among both workers and supervisors, the consequences of which are still under investigation, Now therefore be it resolved that the Board of Commissioners of Orange County request inclusion of Orange County in the official evacuation plan for the proposed Shearon Harris nuclear power plant in the event of an accident. Be it further resolved that the Board of Commissioers of Orange County reserves the right to evaluate the evacuation plan for Orange County and its citiznes and to approve and recommend improvements to this plan. Be it further resolved that the Board of Commissioners of Orange County requests that final approval of the license for Carolina Power and Light to operate the Shearon Harris nuclear power plant be subject -. to prior approval of the official evacuation plan by all affected communities and the complete resolution of all safety issues currently under NRC investigation. ( AS PR0POSEO BY C.A.S.H. (Coalition for Alternatives to Shearon Harris) RESOLUTION FOR AN ALTERNATIVE TO SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Whereas the citizens of North Carolina have resoundingly voiced our opposition, through a recent state-wide referendum, to the location of .a high- level nuclear waste site within the borders of our beloved state, and Whereas high-level nuclear waste is stored in cooling ponds on-site at nuclear power plants for a number of years until the waste has "cooled down" sufficiently to be transported to permanent waste sites, and Whereas high-level nuclear waste from power plants is then transported along the roads, highways and railways of North Carolina and other states to permanent waste sites, through cities, townSand rural areas such as Orange County that may not even use the electricity generated by particular nuclear ._. _ _ power plants, and Whereas the cost of decommissioning a nuclear power plant has been es- timated by Carolina Power and Liglt to be as low as $100 million, but by other experts to be as high as $200 million to $3 billion and even $17 billion (allowing for inflation over a thirty- or forty-year period), and these costs will be passed on to consumers and taxpayers, and Whereas the costs of construcing a high-level nuclear waste dump run about $10 billion, and taxpayers, whether they use nuclear-power electricity or not, will be required to share in this expense, and Whereas communities throughout the United States are making clear their opposition to the locations of high-level nuclear waste sites, thereby increas- ing the likelihood that old nuclear power plants will be left as they are and not be properly dismantled and decommissioned, and Whereas the proposed Shearon Harris nuclear power plants poses a potential threat to the public health and safety of the citizens of Orange County both as an operational plant that could have a serious accident and later as an old plant that is not properly decommissioned and disassembled, and Whereas there are safe alternatives to nuclear fuel, and the cost of con- verting Shearon Harris to non-nuclear fuel is less than the total costs of completing Shearon Harris as a nuclear power plant, proper handling and tem- porary storage of spent fuel rods on-site, Shearon Harris's share of the con- struction and maintenance of one or more high-level nuclear waste dumps, proper transportation, storage and monitoring of Shearon Harris's nuclear waste, and the ultimate cost of properly decommissioning Shearon Harris, Now therefore be it resolved that the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, on behalf of the citizens of Orange County, their health and safety, take whatever steps are necessary to secure the conversion of Shearon Harris to the non-nuclear generation of electricity. Be it further resolved that the Board of Commissioners of Orange County make known their opposition to the licensing and operation of Shearon Harris as a nuclear power plant to Carolina Power and Light, the North Carolina Utilities Commission and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, after 15 years of planning and construction, Carolina Power & Light Company's Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant is essentially complete and represents an investment of at least $3.6 billion, and WHEREAS, construction of the Harris Plant has been closely supervised and reviewed by the appropriate federal and state regulatory agencies, and those agencies will continue to monitor its operation to ensure the safety of the public, and WHEREAS, after reviewing alternatives, regulatory agencies have recommended a mix of nuclear and fossil base load plants and conversion of the Harris Plant to a non- nuclear fuel source is not economically feasible, and WHEREAS, the Harris Plant, like eleven other nuclear units providing electricity for the Carolinas, will be operated by skilled and highly trained personnel, and WHEREAS, in the unlikely event of an accident, the reinforced concrete containment building structure, as well as redundant safety systems, will prevent radioactivity from escaping to the environment in harmful amounts, and WHEREAS, the State of North Carolina has a complete emergency plan to evacuate 10 miles around the Plant, if necessary, and the emergency plan has been approved by federal authorities and has been successfully tested, and WHEREAS, the Orange County Commissioners have confidence in the regulatory process and Carolina Power & Light Company's ability to operate the Harris Plant in a manner that will protect the health and safety of the people of Orange County; BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Orange County Commissioners support the State's emergency plan and urge the towns and municipalities in Orange County to cooperate and work with the North Carolina Division of Emergency Management in developing their own respective emergency plans. Adopted this the day of , 1986. AS PROPOSED BY C.A.S.H. (Coalition for Alternatives to Shearon Harris) RESOLUTION FOR AN ALTERNATIVE TO SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Whereas the citizens of North Carolina have resoundingly voiced our opposition, through a recent state-wide referendum, to the location of a high- level nuclear waste site within the borders of our beloved state, and Whereas high-level nuclear waste is stored in cooling ponds on-site at nuclear power plants for a number of years until the waste has "cooled down" sufficiently to be transported to permanent waste sites, and Whereas high-level nuclear waste from power plants is then transported along the roads, highways and railways of North Carolina and other states to permanent waste sites, through cities, townSand rural areas such as Orange County that may not even use the electricity generated by particular nuclear power plants, and Whereas the cost of decommissioning a nuclear power plant has been es- timated by Carolina Power and Light to be as low as $100 million, but by other experts to be as high as $200 million to $3 billion and even $17 billion (allowing for inflation over a thirty- or forty-year period), and these costs will be passed on to consumers and taxpayers, and Whereas the casts of construcing a high-level nuclear waste dump run about $10 billion, and taxpayers, whether they use nuclear-power electricity or not, will be required to share in this expense, and Whereas communities throughout the United States are making clear their opposition to the locations of high-level nuclear waste sites, thereby increas- ing the likelihood that old nuclear power plants will be left as they are and not be properly dismantled and decommissioned, and Whereas the proposed Shearon Harris nuclear power plants poses a potential threat to the public health and safety of the citizens of Orange County both as an operational plant that could have a serious accident and later as an old plant that is not properly decommissioned and disassembled, and Whereas there are safe alternatives to nuclear fuel, and the cost of con- verting Shearon Harris to non-nuclear fuel is less than the total costs of completing Shearon Harris as a nuclear power plant, proper handling and tem- porary storage of spent fuel rods on-site, Shearon Harris's share of the con- struction and maintenance of one or more high-level nuclear waste dumps, proper transportation, storage and monitoring of Shearon Harris's nuclear waste, and the ultimate cost of properly decommissioning Shearon Harris, Now therefore be it resolved that the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, on behalf of the citizens of Orange County, their health and safety, take whatever steps are necessary to secure the conversion of Shearon Harris to the non-nuclear generation of electricity. Be it further resolved that the Board of Commissioners of Orange County make known their opposition to the licensing and operation of Shearon Harris as a nuclear power plant to Carolina Power and Light, the North Carolina Utilities Commission and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. IEV- 2 - AS PROPOSED BY C.A.S.H. (Coatliton for Alternatives to Shearon Harris) • RESOLUTION REQUESTING INCLUSION OF ORANGE COUNTY IN SHEARON HARRIS EVACUATION PLAN Whereas regulations of the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) require official evacuation plans only for communities within a ten-mile radius of nuclear power plants in the event of an accident, and yet recent accidents at the nuclear power plants at Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania and at Chernobyl in the Ukraine, USSR, have demonstrated that the risks to human, animal, and plant life exposed to harmful levels of radiation extend far beyond a ten-mile radius, and Whereas Orange County and its citizens are mainly located within twenty- to-forty miles of the proposed Shearon Harris nuclear power plant and are there- for at risk, with prevailing winds in our direction one day out of five, of exposure to harmful levels of radiation in the event of a major accident at Shearon Harris, and Whereas the Nuclear. Regulatory Commission` has announced that, in the coming years, there is a fifty-fifty chance of an accident similar to the one at Chernobyl occuring at a reactor in the ;,United States, and Whereas NRC records show that Carolina Power and Light, the utility that would operate the Shearon Harris plant, has one of the worst safety records of any utility company in the United States, thereby increasing the likelihood of an accident at its Wake County nuclear power plant, and Whereas the Wake County Sheriff's Department has concluded that problems of drug abuse during construction of Shearon Harris were widespread among both workers and supervisors, the consequences of which are still under investigation, Now therefore be it resolved that the Board of Commissioners of Orange County request inclusion of Orange County in the official evacuation plan for the proposed Shearon Harris nuclear power plant in the event of an accident. Be it further resolved that the Board of Commissioers of Orange County reserves the right to evaluate the evacuation plan for brange County and its citiznes and to approve and recommend improvements to this plan. Be it further resolved that the Board of Commissioners of Orange County requests that final approval of the license for Carolina Power and Light to operate the Shearon Harris nuclear power plant be subject : to prior approval of the official evacuation plan by all affected communities and the complete resolution of all safety issues currently under NRC investigation. ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 106 EAST MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGH, N. C. 27278 MOSES CAREY LLOYD SHIRLEY E.MARRHAIL NORMAN WALKER DON WILI.HOIT _- t , B.II June 23, 1986 Z '. Senator Russell Walker 1004 Westmont Drive Asheboro, NC 27203 Dear Senator Walker: At the June 17, 1986 regular meeting of the Board of Commissioners several items were discussed with the Board's preference of support stated and voted thereon. The first of these items -als with the issue of impact fees. After a public hearin. in which no • ivate citizen opposition was expressed, t Board adopt-,rt-'AA'a resolution requesting s er g lati )- i :e.',,,,75, g P � � -1 is ' n the ,CL sion of the General Assef 'to , enable t1 - ounty_t t '`sh a system of impact fe k , G. R ... - ees ` weeded ? - -;,., odate the Carrboro Lan. r Qrd.I. • I, -. ._ �, •. -- dw,.e�.. ; a' , :Hill Land o 14 * � ,a`. Also they needed c ` " t o ` .. new public facilities o = 1 , ty ;owners, -e note that we have bro , At. _ applied to a �' r3 , a f e _ could be and 1 '" ' 4 F, i . ., •ing school capital ��, , . A second item a Board discusse• wsthe Governor's proposed one-time General Fund transfer to increase highway funding. The Board voted against the proposal indicating that the State should first demonstrate its willingness to fulfill its present responsibility for school current expense funding before adding other purposes for General Fund support. Another item was in support of a disclosure statement for elected officials. The Board approved the attached resolution which was recommended by the Orange County Democratic Party at its convention on April 5, 1986. Senator Russell Walker June 23, 1986 Page 2 In summary the Board hereby solicits your support for the proposed bill which would provide impact fees, your support for not endorsing the General Fund transfer for DOT and your support and endorsement of an act to require the disclosure of property interest and assets by all members of the Board of Commissioners for Orange County. As always, thank you for your continued help. Best Wishes, Don Willhoit Chair /bab File Enclosures ORANGE COUNTY 003 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agenda ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Item No. (1/161. Meeting Date: JUNE 5, 1986 SUBJECT: RESOLUTION REQUESTING IMPACT FEES LEGISLATION DEPARTMENT: COUNTY MANAGER - PUBLIC HEARING: Yes X No ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: MANAGER'S OFFICE RESOLUTION TELEPHONE N[7NBER: Hillsborough -. 732-8181 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 Mebane - 227-2031 Durham - 688-7331 PURPOSE: To consider adopting a resolution requesting special legislation in the 1986 Session of the General Assembly to enable the County to establish a system of Impact Fees. NEED: The Planning Board, Planning Staff and Board of Commissioners have expressed the desire and need to incorporate impact fees into the planning process countywide. In addition, to accommo- date the Carrboro Land Use Ordinance and the Chapel Hill Land Development Ordinance and the Chapel Hill Land Development Ordinance it will be necessary for impact fee authority to be in place in the joint planning area. Impact fees are mechanisms in which the new development share's the public cost associated with demands and burdens placed on public service delivery systems create by the new development. In essence, impact fees are designed to help defray the costs of expanding public faci- lities. IMPACT: The General Assembly has established June 11, 1986 as the dead- line for receipt of local bills for consideration during this summer's short session. The Town of Chapel Hill has adopted a resolution requesting special legislation for impact fees while the Town of Carrboro requested and received special legislation in 1985. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution requesting the local legislative delegation to introduce special legislation which will amend existing enabling statutes to allow impact fee authorization. Those who wish to make comments will be heard at the a 2 appropriate e that item is discussed. 2. MATTERS NOT ON THE PRINTED AGENDA None. C. ITEMS FOR DECISION 1. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR SPECIAL LEGISLATION DURING THE 1986 SHORT SESSION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY _ a. Hazardous Materials Response Team (A copy of the complete narrative of the bill is in the permanent agenda file in the Clerk's office) . Ken Thompson reviewed this bill. He indicated it would give a greater legal standing to our hazardous materials response efforts. This bill would protect the staff from liability claims and serve the purpose of enabling the County to establish a cross-jurisdictional team to respond to this type of incident. The training would need to be done on a specialized basis. - Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to adopt the resolution and request the local delegation to introduce legislation establishing the Orange County Hazardous Materials Response Team. - After ensued discussion, the motion was amended to add to Section 1 of the bill "Orange County may by ordinance establish procedures and protocol for the operations of the response. team". VOTE: UNANIMOUS. b. Impact Fees (A complete narrative of the Act is in the permanent agenda file in the Clerk's office) . Ken Thompson noted this bill would establish authority to enact impact fees in the future. He outlined the bill and highlighted Section 1- (b) (2) which includes capital improvements to public streets, schools, bridges, sidewalks, bikeways, on and off street surface water drainage ditches, pipes, culverts, other water and sewer facilities, and public recreation facilities. After an extended discussion, motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd to table this item for receipt of further information. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Chair Willhoit to adopt the resolution asking for the enabling legislation for impact fees. VOTE: AYES, 2; NOES, 2 (Commissioners Lloyd and Walker) c. Fire District Boundaries Ken Thompson explained this request for special legislation would give authority to the Board of Commissioners to make a change in a particular fire district line between South Orange and the White Cross district. A petition has been received from 39 persons who are asking to be annexed into the South Orange district. The White Cross district has not allowed this to happen. Motion was made by Commissioner Walker, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to request the Legislative Delegation to pass a local Act to General Statue 69-25. 11 to allow the Orange County Board of Commissioners to change these fire district lines. Commissioner Marshall noted that since there is a controversy that further meetings may produce the same result the legislation would provide and further negotiations should be attempted. After further discussion, the motion was withdrawn. AN ACT CONCERNING LOCAL MATTERS IN ORANGE COUNTY. The General Assembly of North Carolina Enacts: Section 1. G.S. 153A-331 is amended by identifying the ex- isting provisions as subsection (a) and by adding new subsections • to read: (b) Impact Fees Authorized. 1) Orange County may provide by ordinance for a sys- tem of impact fees to be paid by developers to help defray the costs to the County of constructing certain capital improvements, the need for which is created in substantial part by the new development that takes place within the County. 2) For purposes of this subsection, the term capital improvements includes capital improvements to public streets, schools, bridges, sidewalks, bikeways, on and off street surface water drainage ditches, pipes, culverts, other water and sewer facilities, and public recreation facilities, 3) An ordinance adopted under this subsection may be made applicable to all development that occurs within the County. 4) The County may cooperate with the State in the construction of capital improvements to State highway system streets within Orange County. (c) Amount of Fees. 1) In establishing the amount of any impact fee, the County shall endeavor to approach the objective of having every development contribute to a capital improvements fund an amount of revenue that bears a reasonable relationship to that development' s fair share of the costs of the capital improvements that are needed in part because of that development. In fulfill- ing this objective, the County shall, among other steps and actions: (1) Estimate the total cost of improvements by category (e.g. , streets, sidewalks, drainage ways, etc.) that will be needed to provide in a reasonable manner for the public health, safety and welfare of persons residing within the County during a reasonable planning period not to exceed 20 years. The Board of County Commissioners may divide the County into two or more districts and estimate the costs of needed improvements within each district. These estimates shall be peri- odically reviewed and updated and the plan- ning period used may be changed from time to time. (2) Establish a percentage of the total costs of each category of improvement that, in keeping with the objective set forth above, should fairly be borne by those paying the impact fee. (3) Establish a formula that fairly and objec- tively apportions the total costs that are to be borne by those paying impact fees among various types of developments. By way of il- lustration without limitation: a. In the case of street improvements, the impact fee may be related to the number of trips per day generated by different types of uses according to recognized estimates; b. In the case of drainage improvements, the impact fee may be related to the size of a development, the amount of im- pervious surface the development has, or other factors that bear upon the degree to which a development contributes to the need- for drainage improvements made at public expense. (d) Capital Improvements Reserve Funds: Expenditures. 1) Impact fees received by the County shall be deposited in a capital improvements reserve fund or funds estab- lished under Chapter 159 of the General Statutes, Article. 3, Fart. 2. Such funds may be expended only on the type of capital im- provements for which such impact fees were established, and then only in accordance with the provision of subsection 2) of this section. 2) In order to ensure that impact fees paid by a par- ticular development are expended on capital improvements that benefit that development, the County may establish for each category of capital improvement for which it collects an impact fee at least two geographical districts or zones, and impact fees . generated by developments within those districts or zones must be spent on improvements that are located within or that benefit property located within those districts or zones. (e) Credits for Improvements. An impact fee ordinance shall make provision for. credits against required fees when a developer installs improve- ments of a type that generally would be paid for by the County out of a capital reserve account funded by impact fees. The or- dinance may spell out the circumstances under which a developer will be allowed to install such improvements and receive such credits. (f) Appeals Procedure. An ordinance authorizing impact fees as provided herein may provide that any person aggrieved by a decision regarding an impact fee may appeal to the Orange County Board of Adjustment. If the ordinance establishes an appeals procedure, it shall spell out the time within which the appeal must be taken to the board of adjustment, the possible grounds for an appeal and the board's authority in the matter, whether the fee must be paid prior to resolution of the appeal, and other procedural or substantive matters related to appeals. Any decision by the board of adjust- ment shall be subject to review by the superior court by proceed- ings in the nature of certiorari in the same manner as is provided in G.S. 153A-345. (g) Payment of Impact Fees. An ordinance authorizing impact fees as herein provided shall spell out when in the process of development approval and construction impact fees shall be paid and by whom. By way of illustration without limitation, the ordinance may provide that an applicant for a building permit shall submit the impact fee along with the permit application and that building permits shall not be issued until the impact fee has been paid. (h) Refunds. - If this Section or any ordinance adopted thereunder is declared to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, then any impact fees collected shall be refunded to the person paying them together with interest at the rate established under G.S. 105- 241.1, being the same rate paid by the Secretary of Revenue on refunds for tax overpayments. (i) Limitations on Actions. 1) Any action contesting the validity of an ordinance adopted as herein provided must be commenced not later than nine months after the effective date of such ordinance. 2) Any action seeking to recover an impact fee must be commenced not later than nine months after the impact fee is paid. Section 2. G.S. 153A-340 is amended by identifying the ex- isting provisions as subsection (a) and by adding new subsections to read: (b) Impact Fees Authorized. 1) Orange County may provide by ordinance for a sys- tem of impact fees to be paid by developers to help defray the costs to the County of constructing certain capital improvements, the need for which is created in substantial part by the new development that takes place within the County. 2) For purposes of this subsection, the term capital improvements includes capital improvements to public streets, bridges, sidewalks, bikeways, on and off street surface water drainage ditches, pipes, culverts, other drainage facilities, and public recreation facilities. 3) An ordinance adopted under this subsection may be made applicable to all development that occurs within the County. 4) The County may cooperate with the State in the construction of capital improvements to State highway system streets within Orange County. (c) Amount of Fees. 1) In establishing the amount of any impact fee, the County shall endeavor to approach the objective of having every development contribute to a capital improvements fund an amount of revenue that bears a reasonable relationship to that development's fair share of the costs of the capital improvements that are needed in part because of that development. In fulfill- ing this objective, the County shall, among other steps and actions: (1) Estimate the total cost of improvements by category (e.g. , streets, sidewalks, drainage ways, etc.) that will be needed to provide in . a reasonable manner for the public health, safety and welfare of persons residing within the County during a reasonable planning period not to exceed 20 years. The Board of County. Commissioners may divide the County into two or more districts and estimate the costs of needed improvements within each district. These estimates shall be peri- odically reviewed and updated and the plan- ning period used may be changed from time to time. (2) Establish a percentage of the total costs of each category of improvement that, in keeping with the objective set forth above, should fairly be borne by those paying the impact fee. (3) Establish a formula that fairly and objec- tively apportions the total costs that are to be borne by those paying impact fees among various types of developments. By way of il- lustration without limitation: a. In the case of street improvements, the impact fee may be related to the number of trips per day generated by different types of uses according to recognized estimates; b. In the case of drainage improvements, the impact fee may be related to the size of a development, the amount of im- pervious surface the development has, or other factors that bear upon the degree to which a development contributes to the need for drainage improvements made at public expense. (d) Capital Improvements Reserve Funds: Expenditures. 1) Impact fees received by the. County shall be deposited in a capital improvements reserve fund or funds estab- lished under Chapter 159 of the General Statutes, Article 3, Part 2. Such funds may be expended only on the type of capital im- provements for which such impact fees were established, and then only in accordance with the provision of subsection 2) of this section. 2) In order to ensure that impact fees paid by a par ticular development are expended on capital improvements that benefit that development, the County may establish for each category of capital improvement for which it collects an impact fee at least two geographical districts or zones, and impact fees generated by developments within those districts or zones must be spent on improvements that are located within or that benefit property located within those districts or zones. (e) Credits for Improvements. An impact fee ordinance shall make provision for credits against required fees when a developer installs improve- ments of a type that generally would be paid for by the County out of a capital reserve account funded by impact fees. The or- dinance may spell out the circumstances under which a developer will be allowed to install such improvements and receive such credits. (f) Appeals Procedure. An ordinance authorizing impact fees as provided herein may provide that any person aggrieved by a decision regarding an impact fee may appeal to the Orange County Board of Adjustment. If the ordinance establishes an appeals procedure, it shall spell out the time within which the appeal must be taken to the board of adjustment, the possible grounds for an appeal and the board's authority in the matter, whether the fee must be paid prior to resolution of the appeal, and other procedural or substantive matters related to appeals. Any decision by the board of adjust- ment shall be subject to review by the superior court by proceed- ings in the nature of certiorari in the same manner as is provided in G.S. 153A-345. (g) Payment of Impact Fees. An ordinance authorizing impact fees as herein provided shall spell out when in the process of development approval and construction impact fees shall be paid and by whom. By way of illustration without limitation, the ordinance may provide that an applicant for a building permit shall submit the impact fee along with the permit application and that building permits shall not be issued until the impact fee has been paid. (h) Refunds. If this Section or any ordinance adopted thereunder is declared to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, then any impact fees collected shall be refunded to the person paying them together with interest at the rate established under G.S. _ 105- 241.1, being the same rate paid by the Secretary of Revenue on • refunds for tax overpayments. (i) Limitations on Actions. 1) Any action contesting the validity of an ordinance adopted as herein provided must be commenced not later than nine months after the effective date of such ordinance. 2) Any action seeking to recover an impact fee must be commenced not later than nine months after the impact fee is paid. Section 3. This act effects only Orange County and is ef- fective upon ratification. ORANGE COUNTY 0 2 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agenda ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Item No 03 Meeting Date: JUNE 17, 1986 SUBJECT: RESOLUTION REQUESTING IMPACT FEES LEGISLATION - DEPARTMENT: COUNTY MANAGER PUBLIC HEARING: X Yes - No ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: MANAGER'S OFFICE TELEPHONE NUMBER: NONE Hillsborough -- 732-8181 Chapel Hill 968-4501 Mebane - 227-2031. Durham - 688-7331. PURPOSE: To consider adopting a resolution requesting special legislation in the 1986 Session of the General Assembly to enable the County to establish a system of Impact Fees. NEED: The Planning Board, Planning Staff and Board of Commissioners have expressed the desire and need to incorporate impact fees into the planning process countywide. In addition, to accommo- date the Carrboro Land Use Ordinance and the Chapel Hill Land Development Ordinance and the Chapel Hill Land Development. Ordinance it will be necessary for impact fee authority to be in place in the joint planning area. Impact fees are mechanisms in which the new development share's the public cost associated with demands and burdens placed on public service delivery systems create by the new development. In essence, impact fees are designed to help defray the costs of expanding public faci- lities. 'A draft of the bill was provided to the Board in the June 5, 1986 agida_ RECOTIva t1kTICN: As the Board decides.. Tore-/27 2 ,,.nistrative costs. The combined total specified on the adopted Assess- " - .Alt Resolution is $20,768,63 . THERE BEING NO PUBLIC COMMENTS, THE HEARING WAS CLOSED. 3. IMPACT FEES Marvin Collins presented for the receipt of public comment a reso- lution requesting that the legislative delegation introduce special legis- lation in the 1986 Session of the General Assembly, to enable the County to establish a system of Impact Fees. The Planning Board, Planning Staff and Board of Commissioners have expressed a desire for such legislation and to incorporate impact fees into the planning process countywide. In order to accommodate the Carrboro and Chapel Hill Land Use Ordinance and Chapel Hill development standards, it would be necessary to have such a system of impact fees authorized. Fees would be designed to help defray the cost of expand- ing public facilities and the costs would be placed on new development on a per lot or per unit assessment. Collins briefly summarized the purposes of the impact fees. _ Commissioner Walker asked for further clarification on what would be included for impact fees and expressed a concern that it would create double taxation on the developer. THERE BEING NO PUBLIC COMMENTS, THE HEARING WAS CLOSED. D. PUBLIC HEARINGS TO BE CONTINUED UNTIL JULY 7. 1986 Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve the continuation of the public hearings for Heartwood at Black- wood Mountain and the Pantry Area Study until July 7, 1986. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. E. REPORTS 1. TELEPHONE TECHNICAL TASK FORCE Dick Helwig, Chair of the Telephone Technical Task Force, reported on the Commissioners' action that is before the Utilities Commission with regard to telephone long distance failure in Central and Northern Orange County from April 3-11. The responses that have been received from the telephone companies and the Utilities Commission all indicate that the failure was extremely massive and widespread. The task force recommends that the Board consider requesting the Utilities Commission for an extension to mid July. Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve the letter addressed to the Utilities Commission which requests an extension of time for a response until mid July and authorize the Chairman to sign on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. Helwig also reported on the extended telephone area service cost data. He briefly summarized the report. It has been determined that a digital switch will resolve the switching problems and help diagnose cable problems and give everyone access to all the long distance lines. The switch that Centel plans to install in an appropriate switch. The task force recommends that the Board consider requesting Centel provide to the task force a list of precisely what will go into the system and a comprehen- sive list of auxiliary equipment (long distance connections, cable plan, etc. ) and that these lists, along with a report from the task force be forwarded to the North Carolina Utilities Commission asking them to review Centel 's upgrade proposal for (a) technical accuracy, (b) its timeliness, .6/,7/76 , , , 3 , to confirm the assessment roll, accept the Certificate of Mailing [ fered by the Clerk and direct the Tax Collector to collect the assessment. OTE: UNANIMOUS. 2. ROLLINGWOOD ROAD AND STALLINGS ROAD ASSESSMENT ROLL Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Carey to confirm the assessment roll, accept the Certificate of Mailing offered by the Clerk and direct the Tax Collector to collect the assessment. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. _ . 3. IMPACT FEES RESOLUTION Commissioner Lloyd and Walker expressed concern that impact fees would hinder affordable housing. - Chair Willhoit stated that impact fees would lessen the burden on the property tax and put the burden on new development. Commissioner Carey and Chair Willhoit spoke in support of afford- able housing. Planning Board Chair Barry Jacobs informed the Board that the Planning Board voted 7-1 to support the County Commissioners in their efforts to request enabling legislation for impact fees. Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Orange County has been experiencing a rapid rate of growth; and WHEREAS, many of the County's public facilities are approaching their capacity to respond to increasing demands; and WHEREAS, the County has identified a need to implement a system of Impact Fees to partially fund the public improvements that will be needed by new development; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Orange County hereby requests that members of its legislative delegation introduce the attached special legis- lation in the 1986 Session of the General Assembly, to enable the County to establish a system of Impact Fees. This the 17th Day of June, 1986. VOTE: AYES, 3; NOES, 2 (Commissioners Lloyd and Walker) . 4. SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT - PRESENTATIONS BY CASK AND CP&L ON EVACUATION PLAN AND PLANT START-UP PRESENTATION BY CASH PHYLLIS LOTCHIN referred to the resolution recommended by Chair Don Willhoit and suggested that paragraph four which makes reference to the ten-mile evacuation planning zone be amended that would require CP&L to deal with worst case accidents. An evacuation plan predicated on a loss of coolant is a much less potentially dangerous accident than any accident which may reach the containment vessel. She suggested that health statistics be collected for the area around the plant and that they continue to be monitored. She stated that if stopping the plant is not possible everything must be done. to protect the health and safety of the citizens. JANE SHARP stated it has been proven that people can survive until the year 2000 and beyond on solar energy and conser- vation, a small amount of gas and burning some waste. She asked that CP&L be requested to move in this direction. MARGARET STETSON expressed concerns about the medical and NORTH CAROLINA RESOLUTION ORANGE COUNTY WHEREAS , Orange County has been experiencing a rapid rate of growth; and WHEREAS, many of the County's public facilities are approaching their capacity to respond to increasing demands; and WHEREAS , the County has identified a need to implement a system of Impact Fees to partially fund the public improvements that will be needed by new development; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Orange County hereby requests that members of its legislative delegation introduce the attached special legislation in the 1986 Session of the General Assembly, to enable the County to establish a system of Impact Fees. This the 17 day of June , 1986. I , Beverly Blythe, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange, North Carolina, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of so much of the proceedings of the Board of Commissioners for said 1 County at a meeting held on June 17 , 1986, as relates in any way to the resolution requesting legislation necessary to implement impact fees . BEVERLY BLYTHE, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, N.C. [SEAL] - 2 ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 106 EAST MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGH, N. C. 27278 MOSESCAREY BEN LLOYn SHIRLEY E.MANSHALL NORMAN WALKER DON WILLNOIT V June 23, 1986 • Senator Russell Walker 1004 Westmont Drive Asheboro, NC 27203 Dear Senator. Walker: At the June 17, 1986 regular meeting of the Board of Commissioners several items were discussed with the Board's preference of support stated and voted thereon. The first of these items (teals with the issue of impact fees. After a public hearing;° in which no private citizen opposition was expressed, the:,-Board adopted .=•:'a resolution requesting special legislation;" in the 1986 "w Session of the General Assembly `-to _enable the County to establish a system of impact fees. r,Su_ ch fees are 'needed to accommodate the Carrboro Land <,'1,1's6-:-- Ordinance `:,;an-d_'''=the - :Chapel Hill Land Development Ordinance-in: the Joint Planning Area. Also they are needed countywide to mitigate the cost of':: new public facilities on the- existing property owners. please note that we have broadened the :purpose -=,for which the ,fees could be applied to better;: fit,-county functions by including school capital and water and sewer facilities :(section 1.b.2) . A second item the B�_: oard discusseci wasTMthe Governor's proposed one-time General Fund transfer to increase highway funding. The Board voted against the proposal indicating that the State should first demonstrate its willingness to fulfill its present responsibility for school current expense funding before adding other purposes for General Fund support. Another item was in support of a disclosure statement for elected officials. The Board approved the attached resolution which was recommended by the Orange County Democratic Party at its convention on April 5, 1986. M Senator Russell Walker June 23, 1986 Page 2 In summary the Board hereby solicits your support for • the proposed bill which would provide impact fees, your support for not endorsing the General Fund transfer for. DOT and your support and endorsement of an act to require the disclosure of property interest and assets by all members of the Board of Commissioners for Orange County. As always, thank you for your continued help. Best Wishes,- - Don Willhoit Chair /bab File Enclosures NORTH CAROLINA RESOLUTION ORANGE COUNTY WHEREAS , Orange County has been experiencing a rapid rate of growth; and WHEREAS, many of the County' s public facilities are approaching their capacity to respond to increasing demands; and WHEREAS , the County has identified a need to implement a system of Impact Fees to partially fund the public improvements that will be needed by new development; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Orange County hereby requests that members of its legislative delegation introduce the attached special legislation in the 1986 Session of the General Assembly, to enable the County to establish a system of Impact Fees. This the 17 _ day of June , 1986 . I , Beverly Blythe, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange, North Carolina, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of so much of the proceedings of the Board of Commissioners for said 1 County at a meeting held on June 17 , 1986 , as relates in any way to the resolution requesting legislation necessary to implement impact fees . BEVERLY BLYTHE, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, N.C. [SEAL] 2 du aid^d o y CtorIAA744./45*L'I, /if4. 4. WHEREAS, the 1985 Orange County Democratic Party Q Platform state that: "All elected officials , and appointed officials in high policy making positions , should be required to annually disclose significant property or business holdings, or disclose sources of income which may reasonably affect their ._„,judgment in office"; and, • WHEREAS, other jurisdictions, in fast growing areas of North Carolina, including Guilford County, Wake County, Raleigh, Charlotte, and Durham have ethics policies or are considering their adoptions; and , WHEREAS, a stiff conflict of interest code in Guilford County (requested by Guilford officials and inacted by the N.C. Legislature in 1974) has worked well for Guilford County Commissioners; and , WHEREAS, the potential for conflict of interest by public officials in Orange County is increasing because of rapid development in the area. • BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Orange County Board of Commissioners be urged to request the N.C. State Legislature to enact a code of ethics for members of the Orange County Board of Commissioners . This code should provide for complete disclosure of real property holdings in Orange County and ownership e ,ei. . interests in firms doing business with Orange County. Board. members should be required to disqualify themselves for voting on any matter involving any ownership interest . (g oLa --- (b/C ( 1 �� WAKE COUNTY ETHICS POLICY I. Declaration of Policy The officials proper operation of democratic government requires that public and employees be independent, impartial and responsible to the people; that governmental decisions and policy be made in proper channels of the governmental structure; that public office not be used for personal gain; and that the public have confidence in the integrity of its government. In recognition of these goals, a code of ethics for County officials is hereby adopted. The purpose of this policy is to establish guidelines for ethical standards of conduct for all such officials by setting forth those acts or actions that are incompatible with the best interests of- the County. II. Applicability of Ethics Policy The provisions of this policy shall apply to all elected and appointed County officials, members of County boards and commissions appointed by the County Commissioners, and other County employees. • III. Financial and Personal Disclosure glee. .(. Any County official or employee who must officially consider any public matter involving his financial or personal interests, or those of his immediate family, shall first publicly disclose the nature and extent of such interest and shall abstain from acting thereon unless provisions of state law require otherwise. IV. Gifts and Favors No official or employee shall knowingly accept any gift, whether in the form of money, thing, favor, loan or promise, when it could reasonably be inferred that the gift was intended - to influence or reward an official action on his part. Gif- ,, m , o -fav and o inor s o a aenta nature e, timate political contra utions stall not be in ude n thi olicy. V. Appointment, Employment, or Contract Award of Relatives or Business Partners E/ec A et Public officials a record any y must disclose on the public y person of their immediate family related by blood or marriage, . or business interest who is being considered for appointment, employment or contract award by that authority. Immediate family related by blood and marriage are to include: spouse, Child, parents, brothers, sisters, grandparents, grandchildren, step-, half-, and in-law relationships for preceding categories. • 15z VI. Incompatible Service • No public official or employee shall engage g ge in, or accept private employ- ment or render service for private interest, when such employment or service is incompatible with the proper discharge of his official duties. VII. Special Treatment No public official or employee shall grant any special consideration, treatment or advantage to any citizen beyond that which is available to every other citizen. . VIII. Disclosure of Confidential Information No public official or employee shall disclose confidential information concerning the property, government, or affairs of the County in such a manner as to advance the financial or other private interest of himself or others.. IX. Penalty for Violation If any appointed public official or employee is found to have violated any provision of this policy, he may be subject to forfeiture of his appointed office or dismissal from his position. If any elected public official is found to have violated any provision of this policy, he may be subject to public censure. X. All elected and appointed County officials, members of County boards and commissions appointed by the County Commissioners, and other County employees who are serving in these roles at the date this policy becomes effective and those hereafter elected or appointed shall be issued a copy of this policy. XI. Effective Date of Policy This policy shall be effective as of the date of its adoption, December 2, 1985. 1/111 • ( 2 ) . .. ea.-'-.f.--4-e'?-741'•,-ti2i.. --- .t1- -.:''.--- ,:F..7,,-.7-•-'':'--:•-•,-: ,••••-7-----,:: ..4 --:,'- -•:'- -f:'- • _ --• -•-. • '•-•:_ '-.- -; .--.:., I-2. . --.- ---;-..;--.-..;-:',-,•;,::-,„ . --, - - .'-' • '",,4h ----z--, '.---tl.:1:.--- --•:-.1.-:-..::.:-:-. -."•-;-_-'.--7..-:=?tr.. - ;--:77- 3..,--;L:'.: ., : . - • . _. • - -- .-. -• - - _ . _ - "--.A..- *.--.$.. •-••••;:7.t..V":.1-.,:',:-- - - ':-•-•- - '.. - ."':'-:'.', :, ' • • .- : . . . .,-..•-•,-—• . ., . .. -, . , .1, :-.,,,--.' 4"; .:-•. ... - :,;,.-- 4'•'- .. Session Laws-1973 CHAPTER 296 ' -1. ‘_..•,.- . !and cowered by this H. B. 696 CHAPTER 296 : ,:-i,-.,.--. .r_::..-. .(ter Otis bection are -. . AN ACT TO REQUIRE THE DISCLOSURE OF PROPERTY INTERESTS AND ASSETS BY GUILFORD COUNTY OFFICIALS. oyees in the private -- • . ....,,, .-.. r: .7--;-• ' - The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts: - --r State Agencies and -...-.:::--: ,:'- - . Section 1. Every nienllier AI the Hoard of Commiasioners dif Guilford ised and empowered ', .- .- - ' - -County shall within thirty 130)dabs after thy effective date of(bisect or within A.-C., , itt or any other State - - ---...2f. :- -'. - -i". - - - thirty(30)days after assuming office disclewe any legai.equitable or beneficial a:duality.minty,or - . --ii;F ---:,-. , ..administrat- and ,: ._.-,...t...-:e:-_-. . -interest he or his spouse may have in any real property in Guilford County . which is 'in the zoning. water and sewer jurisdiction of the Board of County • -,-q-:' -- - ------.----- --- - Commitnionem of Guilford County. 14 - ill'nforce Act. The - - --;:'ir-: This disclosure shall be filed in writing with the Clerk of Superior Court Alget and request for . . :.:r-:. : 7 - and shall include all real property which any Commission member holds title to, '. be sufficient to give --..' --- - individually or jointly,any real property held in trust as well as any pecuniary eitzate funds to the -•:---,- .-- • '• ''' - interest he may have in any businmi. firm or corporation of whatever nature, e.ided and the proper • ' '- - -5,.!-;--- '':'-'-.1-',... ...- . which holds title to or has any ownership interest in any real property within - -- -' '-'-' - - •- - the zoning, water and sewer jurisdiction of the Board of Commissioners of . --: - - . ---4 :',..Eilz•I.:,, or any other persixi oatecl against in any ,..__ .. . Guilford County. Sec. 2. Every member of the Board of Commissioners of Guilford County y ethnic origin. or by - - -- -- ;;-.-,1-i-1,'J shall disclose any legal.equitable or beneficial ownership interest he may have -, .i..011., in any business,firm,or corporation,of whatever nature,which is doing Insineras tattoo reported to or with Guilford County pursuant to contracts which have heen awarded by the If repreaentat twat in Btmrd rif Cotinly Coninliniiener4. :1 which contains or 7:■ • Sec. 3. Every member of the Board of County Commissioners of Guilford - .; dent ial, a$provided : .lee-.• County shall disclose any legal, equitable.or beneficial ownership interest he J E E1■IN act or when it i 40, may have...in any business, firm, or corporation, of whatever nature, which it. ..tich proceeding the a:tempt ing to-secure the award of a bid from the County,prior to the award of i orders as may be 1 .•. .1a1 any contract. Sec. 4. The acquisition by aro: member subject to this art of any legal. - :i.::.'E. equitable or beneficial interest in real property within the zoning. water and lk71,:i lea/th Federal-State IT,--- sewer jurisdiction of the Board of Commissioners of Guilford County shall he provided in this act dischried within thirty (30) clays after the acquisition of same. Arty legal. •i4i`-•...' q.t.:thin'and approval equitable or beneficial ownership interest which any nienitivr has in any- with other federal busine&s.firm or corporation,of whatever nature, with whom Guilford County -....V l safety and health is now doing business, shall be disclosed within thirty (30) clays lifter the , 7:: .te of North Carolina effective date of this act or within thirty f 301 days after acquisition of the . : :1::.•:::',,i ... ownership interest. act shall receive a See. B. Every Board member who has an ownership interest required to -. • / f tlw emplii•yees of the he diachlsed by this act shall diaqualify himself from voting on any matter • -' .i. of this act or the 1 involving any such lysnership interval which cornea for official net inn before the tl to be invalid, such of the act which can . Boarrl of County Commissioners of Guilford County. . Sec. 6. Any member who violates any provision of this act shall be guilty and to this end the of a misdemeanor and may he fined not more than one thousand dollars i ($1,000) or imprisoned not more than am. year. or both. Any member who is '.,...5-.4 1973. tilt re•i..puct to convicted of a violation of any provision of this act shalt forfeit his elected or i tent and riu_sine-as anti •.t..z., - appointed office,and such office shall te considered vacant as of the date of the 'c is ions. and their final judgment of conviction. See. 7. This net shall berarme eflta r ive on January 1. 1974. J. this the' 1st day of in the General Assembly read three t mows and ratified, this the 1st day of May. 197:3. :....:,-' 327 -,I ..2A .,I. . - . . . E.,t7 - ..-- ,,-'jw‘--.- ---.v.A.4--,-7.1*1--4::„,..'_,t -.;‘;-4.1.i.s.rr ,..:'- tif;,-e,4;- ;$0i-kr.:7;,::-----,,,:---:40,01' ' ---,-- v :4,-,,r8gmfl--.! ). ,1,:.,:.-;:,r,; ,,-...,,,t.::i.-t,:14:-:-.-...t,--.-;:---- .--, ef'_•--ir,-;:;.-'1,-.,._)4F:tV'Ig-liii,.'--.,_14?.'--:,-;1:s1-14tfs)-E-V.-„ i:_iti.,--:,-QS.44,1-..-..c:-.i.;_4174-.q!0,ti.-,-1,11n:,::'-1, 1,6"-lwq47,:.• -.:.=.ii.,,-.-..;....,.. --,--_.,-*.':,-)-:.--,..N411:--,,.7 .V.-f,i'-■:-...:;"=.i. :.,3.'44. ...,,,„.•. ,.. .,r,,...' ' •r, ,r4■..:0 2,--",7,-.4 ,,,,,--.7.•.F.:;•-•-,,,:c-':'-_,-;t4-,.- - ,-i—k-F214,11K-,II--- ,--:',"0-2-6,,,;airob-'-'......7-0.-'7C,,,,,-,7-■-',',.' Zi- . -.4 -,--.:1 • --Alk 2_.1--•:-.4L-s--,.--•,-..e.,•-,3,34-=.•-•...-1,-!---•:,;-.--t.:*---, -tt. •^.Vi`-.-•,!:7-'1'.-;.,-•-•:t••-•!"-'1,•3.-•:''''• '--#---tr••••.:.,i,t4-,i''''•.:^,-1.--,-;.•.,..1.1-',._ ;.-,--.1', -i-,:r.*,-,-, • .. .,::,/...'--.-•:.•-•^.-:-..t ,.-- -A-, -- , •''n-s.,-. . ,-,-;,1•-;_.:„1---., - ,: ..t- it,- Y•-.,- :.-$4".-. - (.4.-'., - -'or.--•-, 4.•:--.Ti- ••.-.'. •-..7,- ,!71.- , 4;;,. _ -. .- - ... . ._4„ . , ,.,-,_,: .. :.• •2r• • . .- Ft =,..,7*•..•:',4P.;-•• it til,TVigt,.%,..0.,..,&&.:..•.1;. L'::;.-_---17._''f•t•,!-....13.174iti.'.,r.,,,, ':-',7;.',':;,-,-.,-.-.-;;:.i.1,_:.44,----A.;.ii..o.ir,;547.-11,0'":11-..:4' -.5:f" ---`-.”.-..- .• !-,',--i'-'=- ...:-.......,■.:----.4--,-‘,-.1-_,--.. ... er'llfilir r,'-r,. .1z14;ar -, - S'' - WAKE COUNTY ETHICS POLICY 1. Declaration of Policy The proper operation of democratic government requires that public officials and employees be independent, impartial and responsible to the people; that governmental decisions and policy be made in proper channels of the governmental structure; that public office not be used for personal gain; and that the public have confidence in the integrity of • its government. In recognition of these goals, a code of ethics for County officials is hereby adopted. The purpose of this policy is to establish guidelines for ethical standards of conduct for all such officials by setting forth those acts or actions that are incompatible with the best interests of the County. II. Applicability of Ethics Policy The provisions of this policy shall apply to all elected and appointed County officials, members of County boards and commissions appointed by the County Commissioners, and other County employees. III. Financial and Personal Disclosure Any County official or employee who must officially consider any public matter involving his financial or personal interests, or those of his immediate family, shall first publicly disclose the nature and extent of such interest and shall abstain from acting thereon unless provisions of state law require otherwise. IV. Gifts and Favors No official or employee shall knowingly accept any gift, whether in the form of money, thing, favor, loan or promise, when it could reasonably be inferred that the gift was intended to influence or reward an official action on his part. Gifts, meals, other favors of an incidental nature and of minor value, or legitimate political contributions shall not be included in this policy. V. Appointment, Employment, or Contract Award of Relatives or Business Partners Public officials of the appointing authority must disclose on the public record any person of their immediate family related by blood or marriage, or business interest who is being considered for appointment, employment or contract award by that authority. Immediate family related by blood and marriage are to include: spouse, child, parents, brothers, sisters, grandparents, grandchildren, step-, half-, and in-law relationships for preceding categories. • . / VI. Incompatible Service No ublic official icial or employee shall engage in or accept private employ- ment or render service for private interest, when such employment or service is incompatible with the proper discharge of his official duties. VII. Special Treatment No public official or employee shall grant any special consideration, treatment or advantage to any citizen beyond that which is available to every other citizen. VIII. Disclosure of Confidential Information No public official or employee shall disclose confidential information concerning the property, government, or affairs of the County in such a manner as to advance •the financial or other private interest of himself or others. IX. Penalty for Violation If any appointed public official or employee is found to have violated any provision of this policy, he may be subject to forfeiture of his appointed office or dismissal from his position. If any elected public official is found to have violated any provision of this policy, he may be subject to public censure. X. All elected and appointed County officials, members of County boards and commissions appointed by the County Commissioners, and other County employees who are serving in these roles at the date this policy becomes effective and those hereafter elected or appointed shall be issued a copy of this policy. XI. Effective Date of Policy This policy shall be effective as of the date of its adoption, December 2, 1985. ( 2 ) . • IL, • • • 16C The News and Observer,Raleigh.N.C.,Wed.,Feb.26, 1986 .ems' Council to consider ethics code • By CONSTANCE LAIBE Meeker said in an interview, their family members from us- , Staff Writer Among the Christmas gifts ing information gained through To avert future dilemmas council members received last their position for personal or about accepting a bag of pea-, year were 3-pound bags of pea- financial gain. nuts,the Raleigh City Council is nuts from the law firm of considering an ethics ordinance Maupin Taylor Ellis & Adams. Like the code adopted by the that spells out appropriate be- Some council members said at Wake commissioners, the pro- havior for members of the the time that they should not posed ordinance states that off i- council and certain boards and accept the gifts. gals found in violation of the commissions. "I think this code of ethics standards can be censured by A draft of the ordinance was will deal with that and spell out the council. submitted Tuesday to the coun- conflicts of interest,not only for A code of ethics for public cil's Law and Finance Commit- council members but also for officials is part of state law,but tee, which will discuss it next the public," council member many municipalities are inter- month. .If adopted, Raleigh Mary C. Cates said in a tele- ested in adopting their own,said would join Charlotte and Dur- phone interview. Laura L. Kranifeld, assistant ham as the only North Carolina Mrs.Cates,who asked for the general counsel with the N.C. • cities with ethics codes. The ordinance, said she also had League of Municipalities. Wake County commissioners received a pound of homemade "I think it is a good idea • approved an ethics policy Iast fudge and two ham slices at because the state statute is a year. Christmas. None of the gifts little hard to interpret some- As proposed, the ordinance have influenced her, she said, times, and there are a lot of would prohibit city officials but "I had a few gifts that were situations that the state doesn't from accepting a gift worth given to me because I was an cover," she said. "I think it's a more than $25, require them to elected official, rather than be- real good idea to avoid even the ' disclose financial interests that cause I was a friend." appearance of impropriety." they or members of their imme- The gifts section of the policy diate families have in a matter would exclude political contri Meeker agreed that council they are considering, and re- butions, and Meeker suggested members had to avoid the sug- 1 quire them to withdraw from at the meeting that gifts ex- gestion of improper conduct. considering such matters. changed with visiting delega- "People aren't bought for "It's more like the Charlotte tions should be excluded. peanuts or the price of a meal," code than anything else," corn- The proposed ordinance also he said. "The important thing is mittee member Charles C. would prohibit city officials and the appearance of it." • • • * ` Wake colon-us' or ussioners favor. new ethics policy Wake County connmioionera in- Appointed officials and county a distributed to all formally agreed Monday to adopt ':employees found in violation of people affected. an ethics policy governing con- the policy are subject to removal Commissioner G.Herbert Stout, its of interest and misconduct , from office or dismissal by the who proposed the adoption ' _• by elected and appointed officials commissioners. Elected officials ethics policy last M: i• in a and county employees. are subject to publiz:censure by telenho - - Monday that The policy includes a require- eummissioners. The policy in- ought the policy "will pro- ment that county officials uud eludes ne mechanism for_r&view vide a point of reference about employees "publicly disclose the of possible conflicts. - what is expected." nature and extent" of any finan- State law does nut allow for the Stout's proposal followed disclo- cial or personal interests that they removal from.office of an elected sures that the former board chair- or members of their immediate .pificial,except by court order. man of the Wake County 1#pspital families have involving a public Commissioners agreed during a System Inc., the hospjta4'g atter- matter they are considering. `work session formally to adopt the ney and a real estate (gent bad The•policy►does not specify how - policy at their',iregular meeting been involved in at yeast four detailed the disclosure must be or Monday., when it will become 'business ventures over;several jw what form it must be made. pffeetive.If the policy is adopted, years. +,. • • • � R 18A The Nags tied Observer.Raleigh,N.C.,Fri.,June;7.SUS 4. .‘----1. ---' `. ' legislator` -St�t� says ethics ° - '' = ,=n has worked well •in G a - ; . sing • By JUAN SANTOS Starr Writer - Despite objections that have _ . - 5 a been raised tgestablishn a jt of v, - ' '. t'Cthiea! code •task':Wo> . bounty' • ys7n officials,A state siSilitor says that Adcock said last week he was --•-- -.- a stiff conflict-n5-interest prowl- opposed an ethics code that n, a - sion has worked well for would apply to appointed officials interview Wednesday that telephone he had commis- sioners in Guilford County since such as members of the county- not bet n aware of the eth'".cs code 1974. owned hospital system. The sys- in effect in Guilford. '' ' ' Sen. Robert G. Shaw, R-Guil- tern's board of directors is respon- "it sounds reasonable to me, ford,said in an interview Wednes- Bible for the operation of Wake but it shouldn't be fltst for our day that an ethics code approved Medical Center and four satellite : county," Aycock said. "It should by the General Assembly — and hospitals. be statewide.I wouldn't opposed it • carrying a possible sentence of up Malone and Massey said the (for Wake), but it would be more to a year in jail for violators—has commissioners could inadvertent- acceptable if it was statewide." : not presented any problems for ly scare away potential appoin- Zieverink agreed with Aycock " the Guilford commissioners. tees if they adopted an ethics code that the special statute sounded • "We felt there should be some that was too strict on financial reasonable. safeguards to protect'the public, disclosures. "I would certainly give it Seri- the commissioners and everybody M. Edmund Aycock, the com- ous consideration between now else,"said Shaw,who served as a missioners chairman,said he was - and the next time the state legisla- . commissioner in Guilford from not opposed to a "simple state- tore meets (in 1986)," Zieverink 1968 to 1976. "I think the public is I ment" that would apply to county said•"It's too late now,and!want - well served with an ethics code. , commissioners. to do things in a calm, cool and Ik's true that the public can vote i' Shaw said he had pushed for collected manner.I have no prob- ' (commissioners) out in four special state legislation, on the lems with it." •• years, but I still think it's a good ethics code for Guilford while he • law." I was a county commissioner there. • +- A current Guilford commission- ' • He said he lobbied for the local ; er,Fred L.Preyer,said he did not : bill, which took effect in January -- •. know of any bad effects that have ;' 1974 and applied only to county However, he added that he - resulted since adoption of the � commissioners, because of the would have'"some difficulty"sap. code. potential for conflicts of interest • rting an ethics code that wow,, "It really just says that you'll in a growing county. apply to appointments made by be honest and decent and fulfill "I had some serious questions," commissioners. • your obligations,and I don't think Shaw said. "It's the same prob- Malone said the proposal was it discourages anybody," Preyer lem you have in a growing county not something the board should said. He also said he knew of no when you start getting calls,start rush into willy-nilly and not give it • cases in which commissioners had hearing rumors and people start due consideration, but I'rir not been charged with violating the talking about what might happen. opposed to developing some sort of uirlclinc to guide us thi•ougn code. Then it's time for a code of g A majority of the Wake commis ethics." I this. sinners last week opposed a sug Besides other provisions in the "I'm quite willing to look at • gestion by Commissioner G. Her- , statute, the law requires commis- I• developing some sort of guidelines best Stout to consider adopting an sioners in Guilford to "disclose and r-c ulations that would be ethics code for both elected and any legal, equitable or beneficial applicable to appointees and onr• appointed public officials in Wake interest he or his spouse may have . board." County government. in real property in Guilford Coun- Adcock said Thursday that de- ' Stout's proposal for guidelines ty which is in the zoning, water spite Guilford's experience, he on ethical conduct followed disclo- . and sewer jurisdiction" of the still opposed an ethics code for • •• • .. _ r---- County. Wake.