HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 05-20-1981 AGENDA
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
SPECIAL MEETING
WEDNESDAY, MAY 20, 198I
7:30 P.M.
BOARD ROOM
LINCOLN CENTER, MERRITT MILL ROAD
CHAPEL HILL, NORTH CAROLINA
1. The Chapel Hill-Carrboro Board of Education will present to the Ora
County Board of Commissioners its 1981-82 school budget request. nge
2. The Board should designate specific areas to be heard on budget
dates: _ June 2, 3 (At Culbroth Jr. High School), 8, 9, 10, 11, 15,-, - ^' ' =
3. The Board of Commissioners should name Trustees of the South 0ra
Fire District, nVe
4. The Board of Commissioners has recently referred to "The Old Social �
vices Building" as the Tax and Records Office. u Betty 0unp er�-'----'--
«egis t or of Deeds, requests the Board officially designate' nnywv�'
the Building and offers additional suggestions for a name for
r cons�deratinn'
474,4
/diC 5" ;W-41
RECCMMEMATIONS MADE BY THE ADVISORY BUDGET COMMISSION FOR 5% OF THE EMPLOYEES'
RETIREMENT COSTS BEING ASSUMED BY THE EMPLOYER IS INCLUDED IN OUR BDEGET RE-
REQUEST. THE LCCAL cosr OF THIS BUDGET TTEM IS $131,000.
IF EXPANSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS ARE APPROVM THE FOLLOWING m S THE IMPACT
THESE IMMO 00 ia VCULD HAVE ON CUR BUDGET.
1. Reducing teacher/student allotment ratio in Grades 4-6 fran 1/30
to 1/28 would provide Chapel Hi 1 with 3 addition teachers.
2. Increasing instructional supply allocations in grades 4-6 from
$13.50 to $15.00 per ADM would provide us with $1,857,
3• Although our budget does not reflect the state allocation for Tex
books, we have anticipated an increase of $1. per ADM for textbooks
grades 9-12.
4. To provide 12-months employment for vocational agricultural teachers
would have no impact on Chapel hill-Carrboro City Schools.
A 10% REVENUE INCREASE FROM THE STATE FOR UTILITIES IS INCLUDED IN OUR BUDGET
PROPOSAL. Utility increases are as follows:
ELECTRICITY 17.9%
NATURAL GAS 25 %
WATER, SEWER, & GARBAGE 23. %
TELEPHONE 15. %
Our total over-all increase in utilities is 21% and assumes continued use of Energy
Conservation Methods,
Our Total Travel Budget (332) is $40,800
STAFFING 81-82
If1CRE�SE DECREASE
PERSONNEL POSITIONS BUDGETED OVER 80-81
81-cam
305.05
TEACHERS 305.05
AMINISTRATORS
28
N -ApOINISTpTI
133.3725 2.6167
INSTRUCTIOAI
I.E., AIDES, PSY., SOC. WORKERS,
COUNSELORS, LIBRARIANS, SPEECH
THERAPISTS, HEAL'T'H
29.
-ADMI(dIS-�A IVE 163.7
'SQSUPPORT MACES STAFF
I.E., SECRETARIES, CAFETERIA WORKERS,
BUS DRIVERS, ACCOUNTING CLERKS, PUR-
CHASING CLERKS, MAINTENANCE WORKERS,
CUSTODIANS, CLERICAL STAFF,
TOTALS
630.1225 (36.0168 )
Lo v)
N N
N
c° '1-: ' c°'
a .4-:7-r- rc-,
N oD r-
\
.r' Lc) se) 14.1
CV . r- t--•:1-....,C)a) in Ln .--
f--
\ "--
U) LO
"111..1.11....... ..."'.------:-Lntjj\L:COL; • C° C•••I N
in C••4
(41 Cs.1 C•4 M In in
cs re) La u-s re) in al r1
›. r-- r 03 In . . , . . , . • • • -
,--
,__c..4 ,D ,. ,- Lo N
CM
..---__I C■1 0.1. C; (:). ,•••• r--.: Cs.1 cm ,—
.cc Lc) r- 04 en ,--
(-)
0
_J
.,-1
r•-) (---)
CC LO LO • "
LU\ • r•••
CD r"-- VD
Lil ,--
0.4 Cs1
44-
vr 1.0 LO LO
r-5 LO
0 • • • „•• •
UJ x). • N.
M LO I-
I- ,--: .crc;
LU
I- 1.--
CL
in 0- C
0
i.r) 0
S- -• 0
L. 0 -P 0
P E 4-)
',--. 41 v■ OS rtS'r- C 4-
■ C rA r- S- S- 4-,
1- S- rcI Cr1 4-) ro U •-; .,,
us S- -r- w "--• ''''
. 0 ..r) vi _0 0 in in 0.0 4-)-4-) .4-' 4-1'
C C C 4-,+3 •- 5-, .,.... .4-, 7, CTI If,I'''' S.- S... 5,- S-
1.- r- C tO) 4,1 S.- rt1 C 0
0 0 0 0 (I) in in i.)1:1- 0000
1-.. r--,-- CU 0 CU C 0 0
›- .5 T 4J 0 ir)
r ' LD C Ifl 0,--- ,r r-•• E 0 0 0 if/ ro 1-•..0
1)•,--.4-.-e- ME +-s I...) CL CL CD. 0-
., •r- ',-. -I-; rri MS &-• 03 3 7 3 3
4ct E > 4-)-0 itS sr)
iTi in in in
0 0 0
0. 0. CL .- 0
0 L)
•,-- os L.3 Lri 0 -to 5- it) 0 0,-
W 4-' c) a) 0) ›.) v", v)If)V) Vs
IA 0 01-0 0)e."" 4-'"- V) (1":( Li.., r Cd-I-J -J r•-•r-'' r7:
Crs Cl Cl -1 _C CI.1 0 1-- a.al C 4-, -1 e., 0 .1:i 1,9
C C C ‹C t.., 0
1-- ir) C •-• LI 0-ms w < """...- 6. ., uc 1--- ut...) u LI
= 0..c -r.• 4-, 7 I- -I-' CO.- •-
•-• ". 'r- Rs 4-3 ..= C.) 21 C) its S. 0 0 S-. ro ir) 0,--,r- 0 0 _ . .
= = ...c in in in 0 a) _c, ,__ u aj„..., c 4-4_3 1-- i.) a) Ls = c).1-,-- g i— N-cu 5a5 la-, '05
u u u 4) 0.3 a) i-- e . ms >1 0-0 ,- in in as = sr) rt3-c Ls.0 =
no ral (0 -0-0-CI 0 S ai 0 ci.43 s_ in 0 x ill•r- 1- 1./. a1 0
Ill CD ad) r-1- ". y 0 = D-v)m 0-.4.--. ui r....o u-1—v)u-c),c_.3
0000
cD 0 0 000 0
gl g RI S
CD Cl CD 000 2 P) .1:::: SS 2' 1 T2(r.2
r-C')cr ct C4 C in LID Ll,tr)41 UD r- ,-•Cs..1 CNI re)
UD VD UD VD
.-4 NI i..0 1- c•41-rd) 7, 1- ,„,- 76 Lc,,,,,,..0 Lo 1/40 ...0 uD VD VD VD Up VD r--.
LO LO 10 Lc)LI1 LO
---
■
,
I
i
■
La
CLI
C4
I .-1 LO U, LO •CL.1 LO r-. -
• 1.0 0.1 CO C4 OD 0-)01,-,-- cn co
.• 01 ,- en cn C‘I r- LO cO
1 k- ■-• LO
1
1
I Ill OD \ CO. cr%
1 1/1 CLI C4 c..;
I
0 o0
Lo
Ls)LO LSI C.1 1.0\ r-- LID
....1\ • ` • " . . . . . . •
i ct C4 0) LC/CO CL.1 5,1 01 r-ir-- LO CO
1 L)
I"-
0 r--I
C4
I ,....)
i
■ --1
IL
. CC
I
I •
C4
,
1.1.1
L°I.0
, I- . • •
on -......
L(ON
I/1 CO
4-
4- C
01 rt:I 0
1- ln 5- 4-,
> 0./ O.
s-
1 o 0 o Lil In ,- 0 0 al o
a.0-4- CL U > CL CC 17.
CD.0.4- 0.1D"0 5- 0- --- C:36
= ro v") 7 1/1
(./1 1.0 4-) tr, s- In czt 0 crl 5.)1/1 0 in --I
v") al 0
.--r-- al >r-- 1/1 1.1 1-- 40 1- 4-,r-.
r0 aD 4-1,-•r- ro 7 a) C rcl al al 0 J
5- 5- 0.4-1 CD
•
40r =r-
In 5.)c0 C.) In..-4 M f..) ,-,L.) 0
co
c:C li
co 0 o 0 CO 0 0 co co 0 cx Ls"
crl 1-•0...1 cr.
In Lo N.co ,4•
CO ct•
In In In In In In ,,o
V)%SD CO,..D..-9 10 UP 1..0 10
CURRENT AND P.', D . ED REVENUE INFORMATION
1. Per Capita Distribution 80-81 5,260
Per Capita Distribution 81-82 5,158
2. County Appropriation 80-81 $2,682,600 or $510 per pupil
County Appropriation 81-82 request $2,918,050 or $566 per pupil
3. County Wide Property Valuation 80-81 $897,463,500
District Property Valuation 80-81 $569,009,514
4. County Wide Tax Rate 80-81 .9959 per $100
District Tax Rate 80-81 .299 per $100
5. District Tax Revenue 80-81 $1,542,000
District Tax Revenue Requested 81-82 $1,668,700
6. County Wide Property Valuation 81-82 (tentative) $1,849,857,121.
District Wide Property Valuation 81-82 (tentative) $1,215,527,388.
7. Using the above property valuation for the district, it would take
14.59 per $100 at a 95"A, collection rate to produce the revenue requested
in the 81-82 budget.
B. 19 on the District Tax is equal to $115,475
SUMMARY OF STATE, FEDERAL, AND LOCAL CUTS 81-82
STATE AND FEDERAL. . . , . ... . .
1. ESEA Title I - Educationally Deprived - 2 Reading Teachers or $25,879
2. ESEA Title VI- Exceptional Child - all services other than salaries have been
eliminated or $22,428
3, ESEA Title rv- School Libraries - Library materials and equipment or $9,449
4, State Public School Fund-Losses due to enrollment Projections
a. 3 Teaching Positions
b. 3.5 Aides grades K-3
c. .5 Support Personnel
5. Local Cuts -
a. Increase teacher/student ratio grades 7-12 (-6.6 positions)
b. 1/2 Vocational Education Director
c. 1/2 Maintenance Director
U. Wisconsin Testing
e, Summer School Transportation, Secondary Level
f. Courtesy Transportation during Regular Term
g. Field Trips
h. Vocational Rehabilitation Contract
6. All CETA Programs have been eliminated - 4 Instructional Aides, 1 Counselor.
BUDGEr ADDITIONS OR RESTORATION OF PRCGRAMS WTTB. LOCAL FUNDS
a. One Reading Teacher ( 1.)
b. Addition of Aides grades 4-6
C. Support Locally cuts made under support personnel (4 c.)
U. One Teaching Position for Early Intervention
e. One Aide for Early Intervention
f. Make all Assistant Principals 12 months
g. Provide Expense Reinbursement to School Board Metbers
h. Provide Soccer Supplement Male im Female) Jr. High,
i. Increase Inservice
j. Provide a special allocation. to Glenwood Elementary School
Library to help them restore books damaged,
k. Addition 1/2 Music Position
1, Change Staffing of Clerical Support at CMS
•
' /l4c.
pl,
-r~- � ; -
/ �/= I
Memorandum To Orange County Board of Commissioners
From: S. M. Gattis, County Manager
. \
Date: April 8, 1081
Subject: Trustees, South Orange Fire District
Currently there are no persons-Serving as Trustees of the South
Orange Fire District. The Clerk informs me these positions have been
advertised at least twiCe but she'received no response,
\ ^ '
| ' '
!!. We now h ave in hand r' residents of Morgan an C
reek Hills
to have their property added f� �tha South Orange Fire District.
To proceed with this addition we need:
}
(A) Unanimous recommendation in writing of the fire protection
commissioner.
(8) Approval of the majority of the Board of Directors of the
organization furnishing fire protection (Carrboro Aldermen).
(C) Approval of the Board of County Commissioners,
(D\ A Public Meeting (Hearing) before the County Commissioners
' withlat least 16 days notice being given in the newspaper.
In order to move forward with this process the Board of Commissioners
should name Trustees of the South Orange Fire District as soon as practical.
A similar petition is circulating in Heritage Hills and should be
filed in the not too distant future.
—
•
„=�m�.^ ,' -
/l��
"� ^.
ii ! �'_
/
-2-
The County Manager informs me that the first step in the add-on process
is to name trustees to the South Orange Fire District, since they will be the
people negotiating with the Town of Carrboro, for this fire protection. There
are several other steps needed in this process as the County Manager explained
in his memo to the Board dated April 8, 1981 , copy of which is attached.
cc: Sam Bettis
Enclosure
U�
° ^ �
^I xl
AGENDA ATTACHMENT '
MEMORANDUM
TO: Orange County Commissioners
FROM: Mark H. Rees, Acting Assistant County Manage
DATE: May 12, 1981
RE: Petition for Add-on to South Orange Fire District
The following is a breakdown of the petition to add properties to the
South Orange Fire Districts' Two-thirds' of the landowners in the affected
areas must consent to the'add-on for the petition to be received. Where the
property is listed in two names, both signatures must appear on the petition.
Farringtin & Morgan Creek
Parcels
-yes 52 67.5%
- •
- � signature 13 ,9�
l§
Signature do not match names on petition 7 9.1%
Only one signature present when two are needed 1 1'3%
2�
Disputed 4 5.2%
77 100%
Heritage Hills
Parcels %.
Yes 39 59.2%
No signature 3 4.5%
Signature do not match names on petition 1 1'5Q
t when two are needed 23 34.8%
O�ly one signature present
66 100%
Based on these results, I do confirm that over 66 2/3 thp signatures
on the Furri ngtin and Morgan Creek petition a,e valid. However, the Hen i:::-.gc
Hills pezirion needs four (4) more "yes" signatures before it will conform to
the two-thirds requirement.
_ . _
-`�
| ..�.
r"✓f-WX0 "
22-Ye#r 9 r t
•
•
r fir a ENDA ATTACHMENT 4 _.
r
I'. 1 from tI If jf 1(!'; ,
ii 3 ' June 'aye f +1#5,:t 4 iv:
�W:.=Xn:. -�''k=6....:"L ::( �.:r:'.'e'r..:':4t......t•v /c: f•r.."`ni/L t _ t1` :i , ,11.4.-0,i�.fi*6 4114;
To: Anne Barnes, Chair F ,;� �'
IOrange County Board of Comrs. .4 E `R.°
Date: May 6, 1981 V
r'
Subject: Name for "Old Social Services Building"
i
With the move of the Register of Deeds office now
scheduled for May 29-31 it has become evident that
we do not wish to continue to refer to our new .
facility as "the old Social Services Building". ;3
.
Therefore, may I please request that the Board
of Commissioners begin to consider a name of the
building that—will be occupied by the offices:6f: 4 .
Register of Deeds, Tax Collector, Tax Supervisor, t L
t
. and Data Processing. i k.
E
Thanking you for your attention to this request.
Er
i
i �!
t
i
iti
1 I ;, ry
1 "4
. .....__4- __ .._-=':-.w_.3. ,t_ X1._._:'_.... ....,.:3..� .∎,
rLr
S:r;
05(
I}u 4
AGENDA ATTACHMENT 4
MEMO
TO: The Board
FROM: The Clt57.
RE: Ms. Betty June Hayes' Suggestions
DATE: 5/14/31
The additional names Ms. Hayes suggests for the "Old Social
Services Building" Are:
County Governmental Annex
County Records & Tax Office
Land Records Offices
77'747"7'
•••--••• '-•"" **.