Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 07-01-1985 p. ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AGENDA REGULAR MEET= MONDAY', JULY 1, 1985 CCMMISSICNERS ROOM HILLSBORCUGH, 7:30 P.M. A. BOARD COMMENTS B. AUDIENCE COMENTS 1. Matters on the Printed Agenda 2. Matters not on the Printed Agenda C. PUBLIC HEARING 1. Renfrew Drive (SR. 1590)/BrigadoonDrive/Md)ermott Drive D. ITEM FOR DECISION 008 1. Adoption of Budget Ordinance 1985-86 E. APPOINTMEMS 009 1. Committee and Advisory Boards 010 2. Tax Supervisor and Tax Collector Terms PAGE # F. ITEMS FOR DECISION • 001 1. Renfrew Drive/Brigadoon Drive/MdDermott Drive Assessment Roll 011 2. Annie Mae Edwards and Joseph Edwards—Preliminary 015 3. James Frill Realty- Preliminary 019 4. Kenny Martin—Preliminary 026 5. O.T. Farrington Family Lands—Minor—Class A Private Road 036 6. 2-7-85 George Horton 051 7. 2-9-85 James L. Freeland 059 8. PD-3-85 West Ten Mobile Park 098 9. Proposed Zoning Ordinance Text: Anendments 110 10. Request for Special Public Bearing--PHE, Inc. 111 11. Participatory Paving Program--Project Addition 115 12. Planning Goals/Cbjectives/Workplan for 1985-86 132 13. Social Services Legal Services Agreement 136 14. Extension of Caldwell Fire Insurance District 140 15. Appeal of Tax Appraisal 145 16. Aging Grant Execution 153 17. Governor Martin's Recognition Program for Volunteers -156 18. July 4, 1985 Fireworks Display G. REPORT 158 1. ABC Store Building H. ADJOURNMENT' 001 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date July 1. 1985 Action Agenda Item 4 e.1. SUBJECT: RENFREW DRIVE (SR 1590)/BRIGADOON DRIVE/MCDERMOTT DRIVE PPP PROJECT DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING X Yes No Attachment(s) Information Contact: SUSAN SMITH PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL CERTIFICATE OF MAILING Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 PURPOSE: To receive public comment on the Preliminary Assessment Roll for Renfrew Drive/Brigadoon Drive/McDermott Drive. To confirm the Final Assessment Roll for the project. NEED: Public input on the preliminary Assessment Roll, filed with the Clerk to the Board and containing a tax description of each parcel of land to be assessed, the basis for the assessment, the amount, assessed against each parcel of land, the terms of payment and the name of the owner of each parcel as can be ascertained from County tax records, is necessary to complete the program procedures for the project. The Clerk to the Board has filed a Certificate of Mailing which certifies that the notices of this public hearing and notices of individual assessments were mailed on or before June 21, 1985. The amount to be assessed includes the local share of the construction costs and project administrative costs. The combined total specified on the adopted Assessment Resolution is $15,800.00. IMPACT: Upon close of the public hearing and confirmation of the - Assessment Roll for the Renfrew Drive/Brigadoon Drive/McDermott Drive project, the Board can direct that the Assessment Roll be delivered to the Orange County Tax Collector for collection. RECOMMENDATION: Confirm the Assessment Roll. Accept the Certificat of Mailing offered by the Clerk. Direct the Tax Collector to collect the assessment. to- 002 ASSESSMENT ROLL IN COWNCTION WITH THE FINANCING AND ASSESSING BY ORANGE COUNTY OF THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE CCST OF PAVING NORTH CAROLINA STATE ROAD #1590, ALSO KNOWN AS RENFREW DRIVE, BRIGADOON DRIVE (PORTION ONLY) , AND MCDERMOTT DRIVE (PORTION ONLY), IN ENO TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA The property described below, the names of the owners of said property, the assessment levied against each parcel of property, the basis for the assessment levied against said parcel and the terms of payment of the assessment all set forth below, together with tax maps of the project, constitute the assessment roll for the paving of North Carolina State Road #1590, also known as Renfrew Drive, Brigadoon Drive (portion only) , and McDermott Drive (portion only) , in Eno Township, Orange County, North Carolina. BASIS FOR ASSESSMENT The basis for assessment against the property described below is frontage abutting the road at an equal rate per foot of frontage which represents the total local share of the cost of this project. TERMS OF PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT A. Within thirty (30) days after notice of the confirmation of assessment roll is published each owner of assessed property may pay his or her assessment in full, without interest - B. Any assessment not paid in full as provided above shall be paid in five (5) equal annual installments with the first such installment, with interest, due sixty (60) days after the date that the • mem— — 00Li assessment roll is confirmed, and the remaining installments, with interest, due on the same date in each successive year until the assessment is paid in full. Map, Property Owners Amount of Block &- Mailing Address Assessment & Lot 22..17C Mamie P. Walsh $ 2407.14 • Route 2, Box 510 Durham, NC 27705 22..24D . Thomas B. Branham $ e15.71 Evelyn Branham 3704 Cambridge Road Durham, NC 27705 22..24E Thomas B. Branham $ 815.71 Evelyn Branham c/o D. D. Branch 3704 Cambridge Road Durham, NC 27705 22..51 Thomas D. Branham $ 466.12 cio Dallas D. Branch 3704 Cambridge Road Durham, NC 27705 22..51A Jean Grote Yates $ 244.72 Route 2. Box 516 Durham, NC 27705 22-51C Jean G. Yates $ 477.7F Route 2, Box 516 Durham, NC 27705 22..52 Janet H. Cates $ 1466.12 Route 2, Box 515A Durham, NC 27705 •22..54 • Frances M. Blackwood $ 233.06 -2- 004 Route 2, Box 515AA Durham, NC 27705 22..55 Linwood W. Johnson, Jr. $ 349.59 Marie Johnson Route 2, Box 514 Durham, NC 27705 22..56 Linwood W. Johnson, Jr. $ 1048.77 Marie Johnson Route 2, Box 514 Durham, NC 27705 „. 22..57 Lester S. Payne 699.18 Frances Payne Route 2, Box 515 Durham, NC 27705 22..58 Lester S. Payne $ 116.53 Frances Payne Route 2, Box 515 Durham, NC 27705 22..61 Sammy L. James Route 2, Box 512B 233.06 Durham, NC 27705 22..62 Gertrude S. Hyde $ 1165.30 1311 Watts Street Durham, NC 27701 22..67 Mary Anne Stocker $ 233.06 Box 931 Trust Dept. Durham, NC 27702 22..69 Lewis G. Burke 49)4.56 Lena Burke 906 Hale Street Durham, NC 27705 22..70 Charles W. Clark $ 582.65 Carolyn P. Clark -3- 00E Route 2, 512 Durham, NC 27705 22..71 James H. Matthews $ 349-59 Eva M. Matthews Route 2, Box 511 Durham, NC 27705 22..73 Mamie P. Walsh $ 1230.09 Route 2, Box 510 Durham, NC 27705 • 22..93 Irma M. Dillon $ 582.65 4640 103ST Place Westminster, CO 80030 22..95 Robert W. Leyen $ 555.62 Jennifer L. Albright Route 2, Box 506-A Durham, NC 27705 22..96 Barcosnic Inc. $ clo R. N. Barringer, Jr. 291-33 • P. 0. Box 2628 • Durham, NC 27705 22..97 Thomas L. Stephenson 291 .33 Josephine Stephenson • 3216 Luther Road • Durham, NC 27712 22..98 Joseph F. Ferettino $ 538.37 Margie Ferettino Route 2, Box 518 Durham, NC 27705 22..99 Cecil C. Martin $ 466.12 Route 2, Box 517 • Durham, NC 27705 22-110 Glenn F. Winstead $ 349-59 Gayla V. Winstead -4- • - 006 Route 2, Box 513 Durham, NC 27705 22..112 Johnnie Mack Arrington $ 699.18 Route 2, Box 512A Durham, NC 27705 22..115 Glenn F. Winstead 1,66.12 Gayle Winstead Route 2, Box 513 Durham, NC 27705 -5- 007 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I, Beverly Blythe, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that on or about June 21, 3985, I mailed, by first-class mail, postage prepaid, a Notice to each property owner of the Public Hearing to be held on the Preliminary Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road i3590, also known as Renfrew Drive, Brigadoon Drive (portion only) , and McDermott Drive (portion only) , located in Eno Township, Orange County, North Carolina. The Notice mailed set the date and time of the Public Hearing and also the amount of assessment on the property owned by the person to whom the Notice was sent according in the County tax records. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, this the 21st day of June, 1985. k • Beverly lythe, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina 1 jj) • The Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange, North Carolina, met in regular session in the Courtroom of the Orange County Courthouse in Hillsborough, North Carolina, the regular place of meeting, at 7:30 0/Cleek on July 1 _, 1985. Present: Commissioner Moses Carey, Commissioner Ben Lloyd, Commissioner Shirl Marshall, Commissioner Norman Walker and Don:Willhoit, Chair Absent: ************************************************************************** The Chair announced that this was the hour and day fixed by the Board of Commissioners for the Public Hearing on the Preliminary Assessment Roll filed with the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners of Orange County pursuant to the direction of the Orange County Board of Commissioners and pursuant ID the Board's decision to finance the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road #1590, also known as Renfrew Drive, Brigadoon Drive (portion only) , and McDermott Drive (portion only) in Eno Township, Orange County, North Carolina. The - Chair also announced that the Board of Commissioners would immediately hear anyone who might wish to be heard on the Preliminary Assessment Roll. Various persons appeared and were recognized and heard on the said Preliminary Assessment RolL Those recognized and the essence of their comments were recorded by the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners in the minutes of the Board. Thereupon, upon Motion of Commissioner Walker , seconded by Commissioner Carey and carried, the Preliminary Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving -1- North Carolina State Road #1590, also known as Renfrew Drive, Brigadoon Drive (portion only) , and McDermott Drive (portion only) , in Eno Township, Orange County, North Carolina, was confirmed in toto. The vote upon confirmation of the assessment made against each property owner was: Ayes: Unanimous Noes: Upon motion of Commissioner Walker seconded by Commissioner Carey and unanimously approved, the Clerk to the Board was directed to enter into the minutes of the Board the confirmation date, hour, and minutes. Thereupon, the Clerk to the Board entered the confirmation effective 1;32 o'clock the . 1st. day of July 1985. Upon motion of Commissioner Walker , seconded by Commissioner Carey and unanimously approved the Clerk to the Board was directed to deliver a copy of the confirmed Assessment Roll to the Orange County Tax Collector. Upon motion of Commissioner Walker , seconded by Commissioner Carey and unanimously approved, the Orange County Tax Collector was directed to publish once, a Notice, no earlier than 20 days from the date of confirmation as herein set forth, that the Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road #3390, also known as Renfrew Drive, Brigadoon Drive (portion only) , and McDermott Drive -2- BENEMMEIME, (portion only) , located, in Eno Township, Orange County, North Carolina, has been confirmed and that assessments may be paid without interest at any time before the expiration of 30 days from the day that the Notice is published and that if not paid within that time, all installments thereof shall bear interest in an amount equal to the interest on past due ad valorem taxes in Orange County. The Chair directed that said Notice shall be published in the Durham Morning Herald. Said Notice shall be in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF CONFIRMATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE FINANCING BY ORANGE COUNTY OF THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COSTS OF PAVING NORTH CAROLINA STATE ROAD #1590, ALSO KNOWN AS RENFREW DRIVE, BRIGADOON DRIVE (PORTION ONLY), AND MCDERMOTT DRIVE (PORTION ONLY) , LOCATED IN ENO TOWICHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Notice is hereby given that pursuant to Article 9 of Chapter 153A of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the Board of Commissioners of Orange County has confirmed the Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road #1590, also known as Renfrew Drive, Brigadoon Drive (portion only) , and McDermott Drive (portion only) , in Eno Township, Orange •County, North Carolina, in tots . The specifics of any adjustment made are in the minutes of the Orange County Board of Commissioners for its meeting on July 1,, 1985. The confirmed Assessment Roll reflects any adjustment. Pursuant thereto: 1. The Board of Commissioners of the County of Orange, North -3- Elfaffilia■ , • Carolina, met in regular session in the Courthouse in Hillsborough, North Carolina, at 7:30 o'clock on July 1 1985. 2. The Chair announced that this was the hour and day fixed by the Board of Commissioners for the Public Hearing on the Preliminary Assessment Roll pursuant to the Board's decision to finance the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road #1590, also known as Renfrew Drive, Brigadoon Drive (portion only), and McDermott Drive (portion only), located in Eno Township, Orange County, North Carolina. 3. An persons attending and wishing to be heard were recognized by the Chair and were heard. 4. The Board confirmed the Assessment Roll and directed its delivery tr) the Orange County Tax Collector. 5. The assessments confirmed by the Board may be paid without interest at any time before the expiration of 30 days from the date of the publication of this Notice. If not paid within this time, all installments thereof shall, bear interest at the rate set for past due Orange County ad valorem taxes. John T. Horner, Tax Collector for Orange County, North Carolina I, Beverly Blythe, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange, North Carolina, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of so much of the proceedings of the Board of Commissioners for said County at a meeting held on July 1 1985, as relates in any -4- way to the confirmation of the Assessment Roll for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road #1590, also known as Renfrew Drive, Brigadoon Drive (portion only) , and McDermott Drive (portion only) , located in Eno Township, Orange County, North Carolina. Beverly Blythe, Clerk ix) the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina (SEAL) -5- .,, • • . • • - 00E g•:'‘ . ORANGE 'COUNTY_ • . . ' . . BOARD, OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA • . _ . • ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NOW_ .. ' - . MEETING DATE • • • . SUBJECT: Adoption of the 19'85-86 Budget Ordinance . . - • . . , • .--:-... .. . 1 : . I-DEPARTM PUBLIC HEARING ENT: County Manager ' -_--YES x NO . . • - . . --- . . . ATTACHMENT(S): . INFORMATION CONTACT: 'COUNTY MANAGER . . • PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH - 732-8181 • : HILLSBOROUGH - 732-9361 - . • - CHAPEL HILL - 967-9251 . . . . . . - MEBANE - 227-2031 - _ . . - . • • • DURHAM - 688-.7331 -- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' PURPOSE: For the Beard of Commissioners to levy taxes and apiropriate.funds for • the period of July 1, ,1985. through June 30, 1986- byadopting• the 1985-86 - . • Budget Ordinance. . - . . . • - • . . . . • . ' ' . . . . . . . • . . . . ' • • • -: .. ' • -- - . -. • . ' • . • _ . . , . . . . • . . . . . . . . - NEED: According to the Local Government Budget and Fiscal Control Act, the - governing board shall' adopt a budget ofdinance not later than. i. - . . _ . . . • • , - . . . . - . . • • . • . _ . - . - . . • . • . . . . _ . . _ . . • - . . . . - . . . . . - _ . . . - . . . . • ••• -- . - • - . . . . ' . • •. •- • • ' . . . . - IMPACT: If the budget ordinance is not adopted until after July...1; 1985, the Board of Commissioners "shall make interim appropriations for the • purpose of paying salaries, debt service payiiients and usual ordinary expenses of the local government for the interval between the beginning • - of the budget year and the adoption of the budget ordinance. Interim -. 1 appropriations so made shall be charged to the proper appropriations • in the budget:ordinance." . . 1 • . . • RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve motion to adopt the 1985-86 Budget Ordinance. - . . . • 0 OE" ORANGE COUNTY • BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agenda ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Item MEETING DATE JULY 1, 1985 SUbjeCt: APPOINTMENTS rDepartmnt: BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS I Public Hearing: yes I Attechnent(s) : InfOrMation Contact: BEVERLY A. BLITLIE, MERE UNDER SEPARATE COVER one Number: 732-8181, 9684501, 227-0231 PURPOSE: The following vacancies are announced together with the indication of the status of securing candidates for possible appointment consideration. All vacancies have been duly advertised. A4 - COMMISSION FOR WOMEN - 1 vacancy; no resumes have been received. A-6 - impuSTHIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BOND AUTHORITY - 3 vacancies; no resumes have been received. A-7 - JURY COMMISSION - 1 vacancy; no resumes are on file. A-13 - RECREATION AND PARKS ADVISORY COUNCIL - 2 vacancies; no resumes have been received. B-1 - BOARD OF REALM - 1 vacancy; 3 resumes have been received. 8-5 - DOMICILIARY HOME ADVISORY COMMITTEE - 1 vacancy; no resumes have been received. B-11 - SOLID WASTE TAKE FORCE - no new resumes have been received. B-15 - SCHOOL MERGER STUDY COMMISSION - 21 resumes have been received. C-3 - CHAPEL HILL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT - 3 vacancies. C-T - ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT - 2 vacancies; no resumes are on file. REGION 3 EMS COUNCIL - 1 vacancy; no resumes have been received. IMPACT: To maintain 100% membership on Commissioners' appointed Boards and Commissions. . RECOMMENDATION: As the Board decides. • ORANGE COUNTY' 0 1G BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agenda ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT it No.EP., IlmaNG DATE 7/1/85 Subject: REAPPOINTMENTS - TAX SUPERVISOR AND TAX COLLECTOR 1_CePartmt: COUNTY MANAGER I 1 Public Hearing: yes no 1 Atbachnent(s) : Information Contact: KENNETH R. THOMPSON NO • one Number: 732-8181, ext. 501 PURPOSE: To consider reappointment and establishment of the term of office of the Orange County Tax Supervisor and Orange County Tax Collector. NEED: The current term of the Orange County Tax Supervisor and Orange County Tax Collector expires July 1, 1985. Per G.S. Section 105-349(a) of the State of North Carolina the Tax Supervisor and Tax Collector is appointed and reappointed by action of the Board of Commissioners and the length of that appointment is established by the Board of Commissioners. It can be either two years, as a minimum, or four years. RECOMMENDATION: As the Board decides. • • • 110 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date July 1. 1985 Actionlenda Item #11. SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR SPECIAL PUBLIC HEARING - PRE, INC. DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes X No Attachment(s) Information Contact: SUSAN SMITH NO Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 PURPOSE: To consider a request from PEE, INC. to schedule a special public hearing on August 5, 1985 to hear a rezoning request to allow for expansion of the established Adam and Eve operation. NEED: PEE, INC. has identified a need to expand their office and warehouse facilities, known as Adam and Eve, to accomodate the growth of the business. Adam and Eve is located on NC 54 in Bingham Township and is zoned General Commercial-4 (GC-4) . The property is located within the BH-3 Rural Neighborhood Activity node. IMPACT: Approval of the request will provide for an accelerated schedule for consideration of a rezoning request for purposes of expansion of the existing facility. RECOMMENDATION: As the Board decides. 111 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date JULY 1. l985 ActionjAgenda Item SUBJECT: PARTICIPATORY PAVING PROGRAM - PROJECT ADDITION DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes X No Attachment(s) Information Contact: SUSAN SMITH REQUEST LETTER APPROVED PROJECTS LIST VICINITY MAP Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 PURPOSE: Board approval of request that Stallings Road (SR 1198) and Rollingwood Road (SR 1194) be paved under the Orange County Participatory Paving Program. NEED: Stallings Road and Rollingwood Road are unpaved state maintain- ed roads in Rollingwood subdivision in Chapel Hill Township. These roads intersect with Bethel-Hickory Grove Church Road (SR 1104) . Paving of the roads would significantly improve the character of the community and address community concerns regarding the level of road usage and problems with dust and mud. A third road in the subdivision, Meadow Lane was approved as PPP priority #2 for the 1985-86 construction year. IMPACT: Acceptance of the project into the Participatory Paving Program will provide for improvement of the roads during the 1985-86 or 1986-87 Secondary Roads Improvement Program. If accepted, . Stallings Road and Rollingwood Road will become project #3 on the Orange County Approved Projects list. The local share of the construction costs is $19,808.00 for Rollin- gwood Road and $7,200.00 for Stallings Road bringing the total annual Program funding requirements to $41,612.00 to date. RECOMMENDATION: Acceptance of Stallings Road (SR 1198) and Rollingwood Road (SR 1194) as a Participatory Paving Program project. 7-84 112 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT HILLSBOROUGH NORTH CAROLINA. 27278 rkECEPAIE V F711 izakai LLI) 17.-JETE--q.--i caso. ORANGE COUNTY PARTICIPATORY PAVING PROGRAM APPLICATION 1 .(4e), the undersigned, request that the road(s) referenced below be paved under the Participatory Paving Program of Orange County. .STA.L1./AMS 44/4 eqe,44s4/a/5/00 09 NAME OF ROAD(S) and STATE ROAD NUMBER(S), if applicable, The spokesperson for this project Is: (NAME) (ADDRESS) 17 T,4 j. Al I Aff.0 z3 G":41,4 73? (PHONE) 9.Z9-.2/ 9 (w) 5'+:2 -es WV A current tax map, on which is highlighted the road(s) , or portion thereof, to be paved under the County PPP program is attached. gika- 6,174' ee)(,1 4,r,1 NAME OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE / 1172,7 :12.:J RETURN COMPLETED APPLICATION FORM TO: ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ATTENTION: SUSAN SMITH 106 EAST MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGH, NC 27278 Y TM_ a{ • • . . e . • ) . . . d' . ti I 4t0%. t ,may , � AMC RI) i 4, 47 f,r Cah.v der I • /I - . . _ 1 / 914C.Ar'''-41.ft. ..t. y ,T • i j A msEcr ups toms i i ORIGINAL 511/6 ORANGE COUNTY PARTICIPATORY PAVING PROGRAM 7/9/61 APPROVED PROJECTS, 4/19/85 CONSTRUCTION PRIORITY PROJECT DATE OF CONTACT LOCAL YEAR REFERENCE NAME "REQUEST PERSON SHARE STATUS 1-i 1982-83 #1 Dumont Drive 3/4/80 Willie Glover— $24,06$ Completed (SR 1595) #2 Mace Road 12/4/80 Carol Doria (SR 13$4) . . .' $18:184 Completed 1983-84 #1 Rangewood -Subdi'visloh ' 10/11/79 Nate Davis $22,026 Completed (SR 2013-2017) #2 Northside Drive 1016/82 Maxine Cates $ 5,440 Completed (SR '1964) #3 , Oak Knob Court 7/27/82 Ellen Graham $ 7,948 Completed (SR 1605)' 1984-85 #1 Joppa Oaks 11/17/$3 Lillian Ricketts $30,260 Completed Subdivision #2 Renfrew Drive 2/23/84 Laura Yates $15,800 In Process (SR 1590) #3 Clearwater Lake Road 4/24/843 Jack Dean $'9,800 In Process (SR 1918) 114 Pineview Drive/Pineview Rd. 5/22/84 Lillian Plummer $6,280 In Process (SR 2012/43) #5 VIlkins• Drive 6/.18/84 Helen Ray $7,040 Completed (SR 1803) 1985-.86 #1 Timberly Road 9/27/84 L.N. Lazarus $12,764 In Process (SR 1794) 11/13/84 Moriah Hill Road 4,160 (SR 1881) $16,924 112 Meadow Lane' 11/15/84 Pat Gallarelli 4,080 In Process .(SR 1195) . • . . . . • . . . . . . . - , • • 0 R A. N' G- E• C 01 17' N• 7 r , . . .- BOARD- Or COMMISSIONERS- . . . . . . ACTION AGENDA- ITEM'ABSTRACT' Meeting'. Date July 1 , )985) • Action Agenda . . SUBJECZ:-. 1985-86-- PLANNING.WORK PROGRAM. PRIORITIES . - - . .., DEPARSMENT: PLANNING • PUBLIC. HEARING Y_ es x No .• • - - Attachment(s)- APRIL 122-, 1985- MEMO FROM information Contact= MARVIN COLLINS PLANNING DIRECTOR TO PLANNING BOARD; • . - DRAM PLANNING BOARD MINUTES OF APRIL, 15, - 1985;,- SUMMARY OF PLANNING BOARD PRIORITIES; Telephone, Numbers MAY 15* 1985 MEMO.FROM. COMMISSION MIR: - Hillsborough - 732-818L . - TO COUNTY MANAGER; Tnie. ESTIMATES FOR- Durham - 688-7331. WM ELEMAK amens- (2040 PIM PLANNING . Mebane - 227-2031 DIRECTOR TO coma= MANAGER DATED JIM 6, Chapel Hill - 968-4501 i . 1985) ................. . . . - • , . 1 . . . . . .. - . PURPOSE:- To consider work. program: elements. and establish: priorities for the Planning . Departmeint in the 1985-86 fiscal. year... • . } . . • - . - • - . . . . . • . ' - • • - NEED:. During the- current 1984-85 fiscal year, the Board_ of Commissioners and. • Planning Board have directed the Planning Staff to undertake- various tasks involving- further refinement of the Land. Use Plan, the updating and/or addition of development standards, clarification of policy issues- and the initiation, of a strong enforcement posture. As the. Bard of Commissioners is currently considering the proposed. 1985-86 budget, it is an opportune time to establish.work program priorities for the. Planning Department in the forthcoming fiscal year. IMPACT:- The establishment of a work program for the Planning Department, including the assignment of priorities to individual Easks or- work elements, would provide- a yardstick by which to measure the Department interms of goal accomplish- . ment; provide the Staff, Planning Board and Commissioners with a common set of issues to address; and to provide a means of -considering "trade-off's" when ' issues arise in the coining year which demand a higher priority. AKENDATION: As the Board decides. . - 1 . ' • 1 ',....., - • - : --..- '... ."'"".-):ti'''.' 4•17,4"tf).:. :-":"4":7;•';'; .:t. ,":....-..:,7::.t..".--:?-.Lt64=::-Z•',:c..,-.7?f-..:.:.,4-P•:.:--.-.4..:7".4.-- •-v.r %'- . - -...'-'.-:': "." "1- :-"--;':. .;- •'-i,=• ;..";:::F.A,.i4•::6".-: ".. ... i:-•::.;.-.4,..,:i•:"."-:'.,';':.:::.'-'..,'..;:•-•-•',,,,;3.1-'''.`,.."*.i-'!,;(4 :::;7‘-•••,::*•;41;:'•.:.::-'-:-.;•,..;,-,,r:•7•,.f.'. .;:7; ..,,,-•:. -."......-_ :•'. . ...v....,..,-.•;-;z;,.....::,,..i.:.L...:7.;,,,,:.... . -- - - - ,.,,, ..,,,,, . ..• ... ,•-•-•;'•••'7.:r......}••■;:^•.:• I:" -t:--..:r'•:!,.,...: ,-2.-: ''-'-',• -..--.-r.. •:.":-."-- ''---.:" "• . " -: .: ..-•-•:::-.".-. :'.."-",!`:' ,- • .., .. - • -.• ........ ., ..:: . •.• .• ‘.." : =•:-Ii.-..•431rAiiNCGR:crotrivicr..prdirmiNG 1)EPA.RTNEIZNir. .. - - -- - ..--- -------;* . . :-71,--....,----r.---.4 ,-• _ - .••. ; , 1 1 i•Ec..v..-.'• -4..•:-Si::;•• , -.5i1.';',:?'--t,'•:;:c.:::luLLemoizotrare • .. .. — .....-.. .:•,,"-...Y..;,......c.../4.•■••:f;,-Fe-';:t.•;•:.i•:•-•*;•*,' . ;,,•.-*:-."'•.:•;.*-••:',"•"....,,::..•-•::.' 4.,"04•••fl,,'•-:'-'4••"••••• . •-•: • ' -s'•0'...- "•=72"%- ,''•2.-- •'-'•••• •:•"•.:'.; '•-•••• NONTEC CAROLINA, :*.k • - - - .2-•:---. . — - ...,-:•'•;•- --f.-•••7••'.-:'="'r's--..',7--`."1 . • . . - - -.7- •-•-- -7 ....--,..,77•;::--,-.--.--, .. . . •- •••••'• -- ''..-• ',-..7.:-..-i.:•:,--1,---- --.;--,f`:‘,:':::--- -- -: • - - -- "•- -• ' • •::"-:..-•- -- - , ,••••:S.,:)?.""; - • - • ."::.• -- - .:''''- -...-`;'‘.:-?..-1:-,'''.--',.."-C If:,;"::'•'-1----1".-1-:.:7-'.-.•;.,:-*-, __,..., . . . -.. , :..-- --. .:,...:''..-.---.t.•7:-..:.i:r.''; - -'----7--.'"••••'`'. erev.--.3"• • . -- .. -•: '• .. -- :.;. ..,,.------. •:•-•. -4-•••.-:::i•-.‘,*•t'..2,--,•••4,:-.•-;- ''' -• 7-',17 a`.. L. .. ;-- ;" •.......!::.. •:•-7:1,--,L..7 :7'1-;::: :•';'...-r.1-Z:?,tr. a 7 1 Pt1. 0. • • . . . .- - ; '-- "- '. • --:'''''''''•,'---•!.-=',.'r.:.t:.-..11'.--..-'--...':':-;..1-1'.-:. ... F..,:,:?.-7 . - . .. . . - - . -..--:•,.._.: •••!,-:..:--•: -J.....,,':,:.=;:f.;::474.7;•...~..f•-•1;..,..,•-::, --•:.&•..t.,-.. ' 04•` • •• - '.-•.e- -•:.-: •• -:.:2.--,:f4-:...-.'-:-:•;:1•;-::;.:".:::::...;;;:-.='::;;;.•:-•,...:::::.:-,-...":-„,... "1 , - . -•- =- -----u.--:•.' -:_-.,,--.-... t"7-....4---.....-..-,-1.-1,,i.--,-:,,,..:..:z‘,z-.-.7--Et----t- - 7--r'''-- '' -'-''•''' 4.""•-'''•.' • • . . --; -- •••••"•-; •:'••7-•-••-•" •••7'..f.t.',TAt . - ._',• - --.7,-..:••:,:',..;;L:.7..:•••:•••!..".:.4.•.:.,ft:::+1_!'•;‘.....ri,--.:7•7i5+:•. ..•ig*....C-•• •;.f.,-'•••.7.F--;•,-..4,...•!-...-. '...•••' - • _: • .. ..- '- - .•-• •-•1'•••''.:.."- : ••t:.;•:-...••••'. . . , ••••-• •.;4-.....,_•-•_-it.:*•;7,1:f-ri.•,,,-17;g4q.:";W:•4..4...,;%•,„%.4.2•-.7*•.:;,;',.:•,::::7:1.Z....•-''''C•-" - • • ' -• • . :. ... . . - - .:-..,.--:.:..... -••••• : . -.:'' ..4,7-v-,-,,,,ic-•:?..7r. ,•.-...,•;;;A:ei.i•Fitz,!.... ,'"..%•:.71.-2-_t•f,:::::r,•;1:*:.•;-(..-;;,:.....!,..mcmaRamat -. . "...- ,....,-.:. ..i. ...:::. - • •• --- -i-,;•....- -:-:-,...:,:,: -'•.-•.4•::--,:.-;......-........,,:,1:R-4:t:-.$..--.4r',••:,,T;;;g:..•--..— •: •, .- -.: -•- ''.. --:-.• ' ...-,,...:7-; ., . -; .4.7:: ,..-..._...zir,,,,,,.:7,:-.:-.?..,::,•-7,:,.•.,-,:.-.-4-1,,t,4%,.-3-4-.. .;z:.-,.:5,:z.;:,..-......,.......:- .....:.-.•.• •. ;• . - . . -. .. - . ...:-...-..- :..;.---. 7,•,,_,:z...;:',...-z-i:;;61k, ' • ... - _...•...-1. ..- .;.....--..-„3;44..3,4.-•:..,7 ,..:.:-.3,-,-,,,.:,-.7,-..-.-,,,,:-.:•. :-..4,72.,•, -,:.:-...;--,:-..- ;_-_,•,. : . • • _. .. . --_. _.- -. ,'..•-:-.4-•,•.-7.--4:?.q •- ...., .,......„.. ,,.....,,,........:...„..,:.;•:..,4....1-0;t•-•-•-...-.2"4.-5..,NA-...d!--;.i.-:-.-:-••*;r5.• 44--;•• -,....-...--,---.-...:-...--- .7. - -• --•-,-,:-.-..-...---.....,...&-.4:.:,-**;,.-.‘,7.,„:•,,..-:••••,.... ._, ..7.. .. . •_ • • .. "Ear:•'COUM:17.e•MAUCEIN.....:2, ... • '.• .• ..-'-••M.'•-I M-•.•--.•-•- ':C••.-•••,••.......--:--•:.'..,-i7:-.73,....,..-'.4..7••,,7..,:.;-,,'••2:•,.--:z,.z..i..2,&i.:.;,:.4.:.i..i•-t...•..z-..-1-.::,:1-::4-,•:;-.-,74.',,-1??-.g,_1.•,:-:::'F,y-g'.1.,,,-.,—:-,i.'r.--.:'z:1/2i-..-=,„,',1;-..it-!1:.1•;-.•-,--;7.-.;7-.,•,;,:•,"-.1".'':-'.:--..,.-!*-:t-.-::,::::.:: - 7.--,.'•••- --:••.•.-_:-.•.-...'..-::.•7.•:--....:-,.,,:., ;••--_•_..-._?.:: i7 =?• 1 - - , - 4 ,,..-i-•-..,-..-•-;.•-..-.- IMM= PLAN • - -.- - _ :,:.1.:,"..-...:.-:,.::7:.:i;.-:.i•...,".-•.1.lt•.i-t;-r.s":,.,,!-':......"-; Iq• .• g- :".-" --':• .--. "''''''''''`-...'""''-'• nor:: u= 6i.....Iggs: -:::::::_:-.. .:..,. 7--;--;':...7.4-;-_--i-,...z:&•.,-,..: i.:-..::: :-.--- 7",- ' - : :..- -• -' ' = l'."- -- -..- •••• ' ."-::-:-.:."...•!...,-.,-;:il..i'a,' . ..-. •. . • ..,,, :- .:_.- .:..•,....:7tx--;--,:",-""::..,:-'1".•.•!"-.--;.::,:,'-,;.:.--,-±,. ...... .: . .,... .... . , . - • . , ' . swIlstrz...- 1985-86;PLANNING LEPALIZENir WORD PROGRAPE-PRIORITIES - • - - - . _--. • . - CTIKM.ESLIIIAtinKS ma._compLraos-Car WORIC.PROGRAIT IlLEMIOTIS)- • - • , •-••. .. • . . . f . . ....... -,..-...--.::......:,-2:::_i,:-. • • -- ,.., ..",•:.....,-.7...:. - -• '.- .;- •-.7./•••••-•,.........;--- ....-- .::•!N._;-7....._.,:::::-_-; -.:•-,...:-.:*-t --..... •• -- : - _•. • . Chairmare Vi 'llIhoit ircfr-F Mar.15,•,. 1985 me.maranduat asked that the list of key- • : ........1 Issues 3.dentifze&there be merged with those contained-inz na y memorandum. to, , - • -••"'.1•:,:---:i • • ‘--.,:•'...-;•A-...,--, the YEA•Trrt;nx Koar&-date&Aprit IZ;,,,. 1985.; Se-further asked that time estimates 1 . -•:: •-•-••••?-.;\,..••• "vie provided for- the completiom of each work: element:. :- • ,- -• - -. - • - -.--.--. • ..• !. ''•.:4.7-"itrt..... Om the attache& pages,..: L have-attempted: to. do titiS... Work elements.have bee .- diiidect into' three, groups-as fallawsr. . - . - .. : .- -.• . ' • • • . • - - . ... .., :....:::_„-. :- -.:'..,:i':',-:ei . •, - • • . - • : _. ;.: -,.;•...4-....,:,......-:,:li...,_:_.....,...:-..-•-,.:-..... ,.•-•--•.:• . -. . • . .- - . t......Activ•ities•iiritiatect ir the-current 1984--65. fiscal year an&which would. . -....I..- "... carry-over-into- the forthroxit' tg- E985-86 year-. • -- • • - - • .- • • • I • • ._.. ., , ..• - .• . . . - • . . . .. Z- Activities wb4iclr-wool&be initiate irr 1985-86; and which- have been- 0 . , ., . .. . • • identif=r• `etf as hier priority items. by either the Planning. Board or • . .• . Chairman:.Willhait itu.his May 15 memorandum- • • • . . .. . . -. . . • . .... ... • , ' . _• . . . , .. • _ ... 1.;. Al't other-activities included iir-my April 12:memorandum.. . - • - • •- - -" -. • . . • . • L have also provide& exr indicatiao of which divisiorr•within the Planning • .-- . Department would assume responsibility for completion. of the work element and am . estimate of the time required: toe.complete each task.. rime- estimates re based. on the. amount of t-tinf■• required to complete- similar elements in past. years. or • - - on- existing schedules:- - ---• - - . • • • . • • • . • . . _ . . . . . .. . • II A . . 1 1 if I .. .....• /,.. ....... ii% Aj . . Marvin R. Collins- . • Planning Director . - - . r.:... ""..."*.::j '-'-•AI ,::"...:.,:- :4:-...::.......!."......r 'r _ ; ,..,.. ••' .• •-:.'..."•%.'.••..". ":'";•:".*:ERWECTEn.8TAFF-TIME ,-.soktrARIErivr POIL . • -. .-..• -- :-!.-."..-.:-:,..-:;„........14,..„,.....t., ;•••••••:•--....k.;,,:7-.•----i.-....,--,-;,:....:... - . _ . ,...,. ,-. . ..... . .. • . • ._ _ .,:..,..„ _,...„......,...,...„.....,....,.„,..: ....T.:_.,..,,i),..,,,____ „ :. .....,, . ...,..,.....-zirr:.....?.7:4-,.c..tz.;,4c:,....t...fics--,........:..i...,..F..-,-...--- ..'',.'.-.r..... ..10.:-.--..;---,5-4......-..... •.-"--.':. ..-. .--- .-z-:--, ..-_-...- z7....,..........:'..r,. .. .,... . ,.....,...‘-.:7-...-.44:-,A.,-...";;;;:-.7,::----.-..,7..m.7.-':,..7.7..4",..-..,..:-.....4.7Z.,r•••r.-...-F--..----_-.-• ---:- - • _- .- . .....-..; -:-";-:.-'7-•:::'::-•:*;"'1•'72'...-r)-.:*-f-''''''14-"*".44-'.'198,5-86;WORK,jPRoGRADE co ., terzTroze -.-'- -'." -- -.- •:------. „.:4-:-:.-,..--..-:::,=:„ .:- ,....r•:•••-.,7=-7 --.;-7- • •- -2,-te*,47. .1%;;A•••‘.4.t.4ig.4,-- . .• ".. '...' .s_f.••••-•*:,...,:-..?-...,;.:.•.:""--,...;7.:-.-•:ff.S,„•:::.;44.-..;.: " "'-'-'--.•• ;;-:', •••" •-•-....t,7•11- ,••:11-!‘trrt. ... tr.::i71.,:•57.',•••,-,i4.-?...re•-;7-4-711`7.-Z. •,-..".• .e.-. "-': .-','"• ,.:' •-•. s •••,': :•••;•7•:-• ,. ' '' .1--_';'-'-. rv:-- '•' .';:r ---77:''"'%1":',■i ."•_1,..41.r; ,tr•,;-.. .. e ..,',•: 6- :*-54,.1,7.4■,-f., -:..".. ..I,. - " • "••... • . , -.r:,- ;.--;"i-iN %:t• ..':'• --"..' " * "• `. .-..."".-"-•'" ."'"::" •■•'•:..' ......."'•••■''..*/.7 . .''''''•.",171,"-'2•;.-:%::=.:7: 77-,.......7.:::? -4::., "".- • -".•. " • ... .;. :. •••••,.' W. !•••,-.:,.:0,4,Pe.t..4 F.:-•Available Itarthours/B-barlaYee/Year: `. .• .f.z_ • . ..-- - . .. ; • •.-- -- -11"-"'''''!'" ''''.41-7-1-1::.• „... - '--, 260 Total VoriC,Days,• - --• ..7 --:.-. -- ....:-•.• -.• - . .. .--.. 'Cesar-Vacation,-bolidays,,- sick:/gave,- train' in' gf • . . . • I— . • 230;reit, Worlc•Day= x 8#Tours/Dar.all. E,,84iI bianhou.rs/Tear •- • . . • _ ..„: • - _ . . - . ,.... .e. . . • :..- .. .-......,...;-.:-.;•:::,:,• .- .Ciirrene Ptaumnw - • ..,..-. ::•,-,,-..-;:2 _.-4 r'"•-*_-_'.....7,- -• .: .: - • .,.....:.;:...4.,-;Z:c:•.••••••;.;',17,;',L,:;p:y-."::.::::7;?,-2'47"4• ..,.:..7;-,..`-:.,.-..-,::.--..-_,.:-. ..........-..7._, _.;-...:7-:-:._:.-:-;._.- :,.. .z.,.4.7,,,-..P••-■,-... -:-..-•.1,,,,.-..a,......-:.7.• ---L-.4..:..-..•..--.••••a•-., -. •, .• • ;a- ''''- x 4eehotir; tionfrar-. 644obnh o u•••r•s-- ---'• ":--;--..y*:--7.-...i-4- --,...-..--,--.7-s•:.........7:.E:,..,,,,.;,i,,,-,-.;-..%..... . ...: -1, :•-•--,-tt..,....,.......=. -.'''.:4:-----:..?",'.:-'•:....",:-f-f-''.;:-,V.;;;s'.4:4::::'. .." *".47-,-.5'..•-t-f...;;:::•,:::.lci4.-:-.4:.•....:-.'',.. ,1;;;;-:::-...--?::::::::•.:.::_-:..:,. , ..__ ... . . - ' : • ..-- -,..'..--:•:;-..,.:::-.1:•••. -:-.. ,• - , .-,4,;.:,:Y.f.v;•'-'17-.1 l't • ..'*. Currint.pcfaitionS.inclucrec'- Planner TIT-Cliz.vrazotu.liead);...• PlanriPx-IE . • .. •-. -.-,4.4i.........1---4t *sci.tbt.cbmprehansLveIsz Planner Ep Flaming.Techniciarr. - 4.:..7.-:.:-.....,4.t4•4•.::',.: - - ' --..z:.-4... -; A... ,P.-••,..,;.:, - ...r--.".,--:°.- :...,.,••:-.4-,. ' va*,,k_ar,7174-1/4,..:4.-,4 ki.--;;Vii:".. .,•-•,-X6.17.:7:1,..!..tr:•-...z.. "...... ---. ,.......,.izt,::.A- .•:s,?•- -•• ----'-',;z:-';''c--*-:-.'-‘,:-;;..,zi.*--:•.414: 3«.:* Cainarebensiiira-,Planninir.••- -.;•.="1.`1.;;.:24.;.-r:••".---4".-.'-.."'-':-4.fr.,,,t. "-:*"."1--• - • -. • • •••••• * .. - - ..-....-::•:*-...,7::74-'n".•,:44, •:•••:--•••••••;'-..-4.-'--7.-':.. - - : •..."- • • -'- • -1'.'-Irt'gt,.`";:.". -.•.".•'• :IA'••••.•••••*•••;:•"•:::::-..""••'•at.;•;•:!... -:•••4-••.....‘•1:7--.;g:':1.4.1:•14/Z.,*--.Nr••••fl•lfr:t7•:;--,-Z•4•7$.. ''•••-!.1":"4.,-:,-"•---:'‘,--3-'i•;••."•'"-•---•.-•• ••••:**-::.-: - 7 ••• ".. • " ' . ---'..7, . ••:• ' : S ttZ raiSit*. rsiins:c l'ACilfanitours/Pogitiontreac.21-6,44CVManhours . ..- • .-...-a--..:4.1.-:: .. s.- .• :....:.---.,..f.,....•• . . • ComPrehertsive Position . ende •Planner TIE (Division Egad); Planner II (Strlit.positio' lc with,Currenth-. Planning Technician;-. Z. Part-tine Planning interns.' e• . . •. • • • . . . •• • .• ..-.--. -*•.:-,-:< IF- Available banhours.;- Pranning lfivisignr- • — • .• . , - 7.* - , •••:.!.......*::; - - *-- -•-• •• = •••:;•..=41'4- -.• ; '.- ;:* :,-r__:-:".`..:;'.'..t.'•• --' 4:40T-Flanizonrs-- . • . . , ... - . . • - ,-,e ...._e,,.. .t .....• ..,.• . ..„.,........xie:.:..4.,t - Caoipreheitaive:, •• -.-• ..e„44G-Itauhours. .: -,.. - - • -. ......-.7.:.:,*f•A . - • • •nhae - '-;47r•-• • - ' - -•• ,ratat. -. .- . -• ••.. .'EZ.,,88.1:1 ltars• - . .• - . . .... • . - - • . . • . •-. .. . - - • -- . 5- WauhourAcLLLriti..______...._a'*es Other Tber- art...Work Pro ant •- -.:::- ' , ...- , . ... ....•- •• .- . . . • - . • r of Total Manbours - " • . . . - - ''*---Activitr, .... .. --. -....,•-.:_.-•;.:••••••...,--___.... .. .. . • . - . .Development Application Review . 19Z ,• Z447 - • b. • Agenda;Preparation :• • 10r • - • 1,288 1 • et, - Permit Issuance- . • . .• _ .. E 1 Z • - 1,•41-T, . d- • Tachnic.all Assistance- • . .- . 154(r -- e--. -Participatory- Paving;P . .Program --: • 2Z • 258: E. Sign-VioTaticnas. . ..• - .. - ' e.. , . . .• 4Z. 51.5 . - - g- Zoning Violation= . . .- 5= . 644.„ . b. Secondary Road Program - - 1Z • 129 . L. Intergovernmental. Coordination, 3Z- .. i. Base Malt Maintenance . . . 1Z- - . 389 129 L. Development Advisory- Comm •ittee. . - 1Z ... 129L ••••••• ' .. • Manhours: Required; . V.-- -. .- 69r 8,887 . . -. - • .- • • • • &- Faubourg Ave'liable For 1985-86 Work Program Total. Available Manhours. . 12;880- - . . Manhours Required -- Other Activities 8,887 Manhours Available - Work Program- 3,993 • . . . - 7_ Manhours- Required - All Activities in 1985-86 Work Program . ' - • . Manhours . . Elements Carried Over FT 1984-85 2,020 Priority Elements FY 1985-86- . • 2,640 Other Work Elements FT- 1985-86 4,340 Total. . 9,000 • - - --.. „•.:.-4-. .r..,-..,--.,4,3.,. ....o,- ,'-:=-F-;...,..:::.,... E.- ..---.:v„...•. •--:-:..-*_':-.:.1.• • .,..*..:.-.7! '• --::-.--7 •-....-."-,--.-.: -.. ,-....:.:f2:.;:-..:::::::;:.;..-:::::.?!.- ,* • .- - .. ..i: .i:c,.2.• ...'..t.k-fr.:=;::.::.;...-.;ii..:.t.-:•-'47-;',.1::.:-"::_7:_''''.:_::::.".,.i.*::-:;,-:.•.:'--.---.- *-_:". -,•-.. • ....- -. • • _`. . : ' . . ._ -' : -;-.-:!:.:-.;"..:"-:,':'7.--...-.. 1..t.c .._::..7:::::-..:....4::-:i..-4-::,:,...:-..?_::::'1'7,..:1.-.........i::::_:.;....::_;.:-..fi;f•s...*--•:'-'• , .- :..-.7.: .: •-- i• . -... •-. . :... .. .- -;,-..-:-_ ---'. -1. ---.':.-77,'14..--..,;•,:-: '1.,- - - .1:-._._--.e......?:-.....---,..-',..7v,-='',..:-.."-....tr::--.-:-:,..:::-.4..14,42•:-.L.-1:.:. :••••::---.-. ::-;-.... '- '•...: :.--. •". : :; ..-. • ---,• -..- •.. '•:--...,:.t..)1•:... .:7. "cr.- .. • -*': • -..' •"..-.:. , ,..*::1'...":1;-:.:-:-,'.•••'''.;`"-•-:•'17.`:•'..'•:".::-:-•••••-•- :1---.'• -- - • - - - * - -. ..- ,..• ' _..-..", -:-::L.-.7.-.2,-..t.:,::.-..,7. '`,• ' . . • --; : •..-...-• 1913,Si86,PLANN321G-WORK.PROGRANE F3•17/11rArrT .- •. • -- -. •... .. .. '''' -.. ...;.; :......,.-....i•-f,;,..-;. • - .-. . . • .-" .• -..'+' •r. . .:.- --:-•-.; . --- • . •..., - -1-;".....„: -'..•''' .• : . t. .. .---. • f• •- •::'TIVIP- SV:na: S-EOM coin:Mans . . .. ., • • .- ":'• ELMO:NTS 're at CARRIED-OVER PRUE pr.1984-EM .....- . _1- :z.„... - .,•:, ......• . •- .. -• _. • • _ .-,....•• . .. .• • ' • EIXSI:ING PROJECZCS,ASSIGNEE0 num:Lid.Pr:1984415). ^ - • - • - - . • •. .- . _ . ... . , • ' •- , •• . . .--..•-•--;;_.. 4,..7-7?.;.;*:,•;.:".:.•1•;,,,:.,..-*...,...•:.......„--, '''.-, '•-- ., „__ . .• • . -', .. -- •.tasi .. - • . -.•: --f-• -.,.-4.•-•1--..,,,-.-::-:-....:•-•-..-:::::-••••...-7••• : Resnonszbriaty- - .T-trne Ebtimate. -• -•• •--— •• • • : , :-...,:.•-..,,,,.-',,...*::1,- ••.::- ., . • •*".-'• . • •. ,-•-.'. ".-.-.....7•::•-•....:- ;,::7,-.=:;.-%-.;.•.:-)5.:sv-4.-4•,-:•••..;-.,....:... :. - • . . . ..• •,•-..• • • ' ' • r.: scix-.-n" &litarnzit. cHi ifaiess..PIalr. • -;. --:- ••'--.•-••. gotairrehensive-Plannii..t' Et - .• ,,.. • • 8'111.• • .' -:-•:' .•': ire-tut:ling stritiversit3r,re•- „.',--.. _' .. -;•: . 4- .Watersheck - ' . • . . • . . -_ ,• ...- ., ' • - - ..--z.••:•::::.::::--rr. ''.•- , .. Z.. Cane Cree.k.Wateeihea Sicutr--" - • Cbuigirehensive Planxting: . 1•61:t• • •-• : ' , • 3.L.Watershett:Stancrardst Revision •••-• •Current Kenning ', . .• 4- Subdivision:Reguratms Update Current Prannilig- • - • . 4e. .-... • , - • • • . . .. 5. Mobile Rome Standards Update •Current.PTarrtrtrtg• 80, . . . • 6.- Planned Development Standards Current Pig. . - Update - • • .. • 7..: . ' . ••'' -.'::''' '''': - . • • . ' .• • • • • ....... . •• 7;',..Special WS e'•Hoafication •...,Cu.rrertt Planning_ • - • .- • ' :---4.:... Standards Update- -• : . .. ......,:-..t:•-•:::, -.7..i.:-.•''-- -.*- .• - -- Computerized. Buildim..permit - i rxispectionsfitelnYfrefcrtratiorr. * • 160; •. • ...- - - : - .. •• .- • • System- .'• . -. • . . • .. . ..... , . . . . .. .. 9'. Enforcement Procedures. : • . . • •. Current_Planning . - • . . _....__...... . . . . la:. Public Relations/Education _ Current/Comprehensive - - . . . Programsr - • • . .-......._..-:.,:.• ••: Planning. . .. - • - . :•• • .. - •- . It- Water/Sewer Extension Policy- Comprehensive. Planning - . "ZICt•- - 1Z. Water- Reservoir- Study- . . Comprehensive Planning. . 40* . (IfcAdaras. Report)- • . . . , - • . . . . • . - .... 13- Sewage Disposal Policies • . Comprehensive Planning_ • 2(1- 1 • 14- Water/Sewer Service Policies — Current Planning 1•60: . Rillaborouglx . . ._.. - . . . _ . • - . • • 15- Eflands. Sewer Impact — tan& Use. .Comprehensive Planning 40 • Plan; Implications- _. . . . 16... Road- Capacity Studies/Road Current Planning : 80 . Definitions & Classifications . ' . _ All. Work Elements — Time Required - 2,020 Manhours. . • • Notes: (1) Joint Planning Area Plans includes two 1-40 interchan.ges I (2) Subdivision. Regulations Update includes provisions regarding requirements for dedication/reservation of recreation land or payment-in-lieu. • I tiw •7. .; '�.. • y,:• i.v.r'. . 1-.J"'° - ' :••'!'".r^ `ytei `�::''�r .�'c-_. ._;::r_r-^. _•" . -.•- .t' . � • %.y y. .: Kiw1•.�� _..' ' 'v-T( +• >.?•-:a.yv -':_.,,~ _:�"i�7+�-w-..'r1a:.;�. _ e�{ --��:-:"''. ' -•-':ter'- + '' _rtj; 1a. ?"! :.'••• .1.'5:14xn:L�.•. .rF-a2.1,:=a=r.? .:"':i" .'�.•:T' r;- -,._ :• __ . :::-- -;•-•„•:.:,_-.::_.--......,:-....,,-F:.n_ _ •.r.:•f-•s'':.•.'4 t';F:•i.c!tr'r.!vi_. o s* ..:,e -„ Y._;i•,•'. m' 5='i�ii 1�.•:�': _ _ _ - • VLS.9 •;. - •-,•:.•1:• iL _ i >F.� . 4 E .Gu-+J'f.;re � -'_w�y:a-::,,,:; ":::":-...:::-'7. _ - ."-K-,1,4-'7 tid --r.. •..:- ! • _ - .y '4 ••r . V V:. A•KYS;4'°C`_ .••"':_ _ '•l:a:%- _ ':'..!...;t":"..-:::".•;..; _ F._. - ' •lS�'y. •' _+ :fi: . . r + 2• -4 . G a; nt; as 1. ^.F.•Y r __ . _ • .•s - .. • . _y...I„ �'. .�_-... Y..-.� _+:�•..... _ .. _ - cs 1 � - J 'C'-•Zr-. �....' .y4 • �fr :-.if^ ..-,f1S 'y,,,$vy ,Was-es prima= PROGRAM I h�YryTS: • • . _ •,I �• • +• "1':'!S?`▪ iTy'h'ry'�• -a^[' : 4 « �kl� , .`' - - -.•_ :,� � .r ; •- : .. '. fO E. _ •,", :.;. t TIM'ESTIMATES FM C ETI :'rt •j:A R�-4•. i17-,K: f74yi .:w4;Ji �- - •, Y”1�L NTS`TO'B 2NLTIAT PREORIT ED' IM:s' 198,586;Pr. ' . • ' . _ - . sm.PROJECTS.Tom.BE.ADDE1 . DS're 1985-8&AN WIEIC :CM.=CDC: _ " r��� , . - .. - .TS "»_ gilt.* ACi Js bi1 - Time a tsamate .. • :'. 1•r.- i'C=- :,;-?S7- 1.:ap.. bik tia4.4cr.• c ▪ � • L .Designatiare.aE•Reserve ii'Si tesCis' :••••• Comprelnentive Planning, PW . Little.Rive:an&an Upper:Ram,Watersheds • . • . Z..Ae Study T.-- tit-- ' t hsug,e~ Comprehensive.Manning,. 22a ' .:-.-: • .. Stutbe aff A BC Off'2:0 CL C fiance: Current-Planning- + °' Rca t i oQSi•Slia.we sr. "(Cl ' . ..:.••;::..: •., = _ - - .. •- - .i �+v•. a.•::t.,; r• ▪ _ • : •; ._.• 4.: Thoroughfare.Prim: -:r�,,.rw:,':* .:nj •',':_ . _Courpr�Pvi►Prtg iv'e: P=Lauri-ru ' 1.6M 1 - 1- :-,. '-i'• _ `•ru_ 'rr•M1 (Naar as tic .pat`ion). 5.. Development of l4ethodatagy- far Pre- Current Planning: • SIX .•&mi gg. of Property _:_ r _ . .._ I • . -.• 6.. Conm zciar/Zndustr aL Development • - Current P't'anr4ng • I6O= • ' Stadrds Update! .t-f - ._ � .T.' . __•n •• 7'.. r Fttt.Development roller Update Comprehensive:••Planning 8O: . ...Comprehensive Planning . • .:, .k-r -•- ;L,.4 - c ea on Department . �::r ;�r, ': _ ''f. fp gacticipatiou -9 •._ -- Comprehensive- Pl ann i• ng • 'gam CC • ICk tittle River T:bwaship` Lance Use Platt Comprehensive Planning 4.40t . - 1.L.. Computerized,Lanc± U's e- Tnfaarnn#tiom . Comprehensive•Planning 651• System - (Data(Processing/Land - • 2,7E - • Records: Participation); • • . Alt Work.Elements — T•mP•Required - - . ' - 'Z,6ii0..Manhours- - - I,9lG • • . Note: Tasks and manhours deleted represent projects-which must be taken: front work. program to stay within available manhours. _• • • - 1- • • -. --- - •..--•-, •---.-- - •,-..•-•.-,.--'-'7•,:0•.:....:-L.4"1.1".•---','' _.,-...';'.......t-,.-e.:.V.:-:,' ' ::- tt" . ., ,-.:, -....-.-!..-..-,...-:;,,.-.-r--.-.4.--,,z;-5/.=•- evif- tz;`1"- -;:::7,:$$;;;;161-'-a-i--.0.:1:14iisit..-7::%"-`4z:-,-..---.4...'::"...-17'. .'•:,---;:r4.-2-11/4-•.-•-•%:. :- -•.- ,-2-..A...:-.!-‘-.-.!::::•::::-='g7:--.--7,-• -•<..t.-r-.,:,-:-.--::4: I • ___-.-.,.„,-0.-:_ :,...:z 4:,-•• ..,: .......,t ._-;.;4,,tt.:;•••:::::: .;;:q...:4:‘, -t:•,-.r.- -.: - . - 1-:.-:*_-• -0-- A.• ;:. ---''-'4.-,....,p':.: -,...;....-i- :f •.•f-;;-7:. t,t.**,:-'47;,,,,f.it:..,7:4-...::.--lys...;17:.".. .-ir:ri-•-.7.---A..--.:-...--:,. •--: .... ...... ..:.. ..:- •,, '.'"-t:.--:,-::.7.4 ' ,-. '. J.• - -7-.- •;..;.;: -12..4. 7-...Z::•-..7.-::,,,,F.,..it.:....,1',-,:,1,-,;::;. ,..- ,::-.--:,: .,t;:-!,,:..:,,...-.4 :....-.,-s:-1-7 ::..:,-..-,.' . _. ..- :.. .,.._-_,--,,.- ..._ ... ,-.7..-..e.:_-..4-t-j-_,,-,...: , 4;.:4,-;7,,,1:1,-_ ..;:g..;K;;t:71.,;,ttz..q.„.!.:...s_t.:,v7..,,:-..:-.. ..._, ...--...?,:-..,,I,,?..:,.:. ....----- ,_4. -- ....„-:.--...--:.....:-.4,-:11.:',1-. . i.,--.:-:::_.:-• ....::::f-,..r. - - ... , 1 2 e ,-.1,.,-„,...1:tt.„...:;,Z.7%,;t.F.,2*-.e.rfi'5-,:44:-.1,5307ft7e,,"&.7.44:*;etter,..fet"---,-.:-.%El-:,-..::,,:.,...--'sr.....: • Z'4-7...''...?4,441"a'f..›.`i;•.,717.74:6.!`,C,I'..,..,t!t&I'4•Jtkle...".111,14......."4- 1.. :7-,--,.7,.,:,.. ..-,......-:..., ..:, -_.- ..4. ,..z,.7-- 4,1...,..-....:::::7 ...4,-,-,••••%;;;$.:,-.tr.,i•^ ',.1, . ". . . . . e.,,... •.. ,74;,...t-,i;i7;.r.t..4 f......-•,,,V3:."."?.?gr.:17:7:9?":e.,f,C.-...-......,..A.,-;..., „. ,„,.. - .•'.-, - , ,-.. ..... .i...,...1.,t,..,...,„.,......:,.; %:-.:, .1.:54...',",r.s---1,985-86i.PLANNI/104141ORK Mi.OGRA14 PRIORITIES ": -- •• -.----, Pal..rtt,----,::--:,-b-;- 7,. .,- . ..:•--. ..--- • -••-,...- . 1 • --- . .-„: • •....,.. •-•.(f. .:;-.. l ...,.,•:,...::-2.-,:_tf:A 4,-,,.-.:.;!:..1.55,,:::;e:4:;:::5 Ana-. "- • •-.-••.. , . - ,..... , .. .._,. . • . :• .7. -,:: •,...;-:..*:-;:-. •-:,. , , „ .„--•,,...,:::::--.4.--::-v,•-:......,.-,:f_:.-:.. -•-.:,.-:.-- .- . .,, . . • `:. - - •,--- ----'-'::::'' ;.•*.v-.'-•••• --":•-:•••••TTher KSTIbIATES Port cc:nava/arr.. •. -. :,-..,. -..,.., • . . -- .,-- - • - -- -.- - • -.. • • 4 "."•-••••— :.,--..-•.'—..--:,:—*—:--e,•t,..—"1"t:.•-.:,;: 2 !..1.1; •—j-:.'- • . ".••• .''.. ' • • . . . . — • —•- '':'::',..,.,,....., '..- :•'' '''' ;;....'"•:::7%.,:•'.'.: e'..-‘,..--:....:::: r',......-; rr-:- -,-:::••• 441..r :-:•• -.. • Es •-; . .., .--;"- ' • • • -- - --..-• . :• •-- • • • : — . . • • " .'- ' . °TEEM WORN ELSEEliTS TO II1C 11SITITATECr I1V.196.546a Fr • . — • .... ...... : .,.. ....... PROJECTS WaltIE'CANNOZ.131L-CO/IPLETEIt WITEM AITAITARrrit;MARRO DRS - • . _ . - • - - • :. '.•••••-••••, ---4-2:cr:.•••:.; - • --. re-- , - --.'-'".•:.:4---i,• ••?..•-.4;-.1-i!.••.:::=_;-....,,,--ek .....:- . . - - - • -?!7:4,..-,..i.”: . • , • Time Estimates-- - • _Metre,. _. ,- --:-.•.i;',...-*V41.,Liw,;:-;,,,:.:.%;4„:„1. .*:,-. -:,-;;-.•.;,..ate,-;s,_:,,-.4 Xesponsi.brli.ty •.- ,...,7---,-.... . :•_--.,,.::,-.•!:-4::::*-4-1:::::•41:4,..1'.--*- -:,,c::3F -tlf•a:aW:5'r.:-.-..,:.-„: . - -•-:•".. .-.--,:::,'.'......................................................................................... -.: :-':;'::- i.-,- • ''..•• - .-'.... . -- . - . - .........,,.......-,-..;;,.r.-.7.•t•-.1. r- Crrdinance-ConsoliciatL:thi-''''''f 1111Effeca-";,:-._-_,-.Curreit.,Plannang. r.pcb-e.tra*code.- "•S-_.'-_-, • 2-.......,-• ••-:',' .: ;,.. . . . , - • • •.• "- • •••• • '7--F'-'•I''''''''-.'"-17;1-7:;•t4-fff•-.1;•'4•4i't" E'is..-.5,7,1:-,i::2;4;::-: •TY-1-.....,•,-- .-' , •- r--Deve:topment.of Irntrancesar-PbTicy.r-'.'..- .: CoulFcebiallsi7e,Piallgri-lig- * ". ..'"' '.51 ----.::"--.......7":.-:.-::::H.4.:1.,: " ,,.:,..v.4,--::•=4-:::::=- '' ..- •:.- -.- T.- Desiget. Stancrards far,St:E•eets,,i'''. i' ','..7'...- Cietrent Ptarezing. •• - . - - • • :::" -7";:-.Erit?!...,..,' .. .•.• - •'...•:',..,i 4,, . . ,...... • • _ . ', 4.. Development of Urban-Rural!. Tercei'me - Cinnqxreheirsilze:PIarusin g_ . • • 161l D'iStrict Concept - . . . --• -..: - --.••••:•:.':•••••,•••.Ili,':,.':•"-*''' - • . . 5- Area Study-- Parttrr Area - ' . . -• '• -.-: -._: Comprehensive Plarwrinm - ,. - • •-• '"22(1. . . . .. . 6,- Standardize&Procedures Ileum:et • - • ' :. Atiminr—istratiort . . .. T- Computer.Programa:--.•Pratatin` g Libra Compraheasi.ve Pl.antrins : - 4(t - -. -=::*:-'•*77--- - -' - -• -- .::::::::-.•, ...- Computer Prograue- Piscat,Impact - • Courprehensive- Plarsair-rg. - 163 -.----'- .. _•:: ' . • • ..- .• Arratys•is a _ . • . ..- • • • . • 90.- Iurpact FeescApplinatiom. . . ......,.•.-,,...:;.. current Ptanni.ng • ' 8C1.: . • -• '1::" • ...--. -.- • Ia.. Consolidated Yee FeherhyTP. ' •-• Achunan; -st=atiore • • 801 • . _ . •._ . . .. • . . 11- Loto-Income•libusr.ng Issues • - .,,,,• Comprehensive Planning. 1604, • • .. 1Z- LESA-(Land: Evaluatiore System- ' Comprehensive Planning • 65CE- . • • Analysis), - . - --• . .-.,• .• - • - . • . .• . • 13- Groundwater Protect:iore Study Comprehensive Planning 44O I ---- • : -, . 14-- Computer virornaental Comprehensive Planning ta Bank . . . . . . . . . . . . 15- Intergovernmental. Coordination - Current/Coopreh,ensive 80- Su.rrounding,Counties_ Planning ' I • AIL Work.Elements - Time Requited. -- . 4,340 Manhours I . .. • . - I - - • - - . . • 1`; f MD=cam=BOARD:OP caosisscaeas • mizaces7ce mamma 21_ - %11:-. Kenneth R. Thompson PRClit Don Willboit - 602,13=r. Planning: ItemsA • DATE:. May 16g• 1985 • . . - • Joint Planning Public Bearing- is.scheduled for - • Mane 1I and it is lay understanding' that- only one:item. is• 011. . the Public Hearing agenda.. 11xts would be a good opportunity to have a briefing for the Chapel Bill Rbwn Council, the, • Board of Commissioners and. the Orange County Planning Board on the status of faint Planning planning. It would also be a c:onvenient tian to- have a work session.with- the Planning Board regarding the Planning Department's work program:prior- ities.for 1985-86.. Commissio' ner Marshall and' r net with Alice Gordon, ' • • Manning Board. C/tair-,, and pregared a list of key issues that • - should be considered. in setting priorities for 1985-86. •- These: issues include: .• Designation of water quality critical areas for Cane • Creek and University Lake reservoirs. 2.- Review impact of sewer line. (alternates A. and B) on • McGowan Creek. and land.Use Plan. . 3'. Consider designation of reservoir sites in Upper Eno and Little River watersheds.. I . 4. Review ;T111 eborougWe water and. sewer.exten.sion • 5. Review and take formal action on. the. mcklams' Report.. 6. Prepare area plans for'I-40 interchanges. 7. Review water and sewer extension-policies. • 8. Perform road capacity studies. 9. Prepare definition of "minor road." 10. Review adequacy of Zoning Ordinance in accomnodating 1-40. I • - „ • ' .12 2 INc��CE MEL : 8505-701- Planning Its • .. 15, 1985 >. 2 •• - II.. Review mobile- standards.. 1Z. *Revise subdi visix�,ordinance e to require recreational• • open.space or payment into. trust fund for acquisition • recreairianal.open spy. • • 13'. Revissip effectiveness of ordinance enforce 't e item need. to be merged. with the List in • Marvin Conine Apri,Z n mega to.• the Plarming Board.. Iii • order to set priorities we will need:an estimate of the staff required.for each i , . , • - I:would appreci ate:it if you.:would have this infor-- nation distributed prior to the'June-Lt Joint. Manning Meet- ` • ~ - . • co z- Board-of Con ssioners' - . Dr.•Mite Gorc:I:rx • • • • ORANGE couivry PLANNThra DEPARTMENT' 4-r-•t- , MIMSBOROMEE " NOW CALROZIAtaa 27278- ,011 .ii101111)...7% MBMORANDURE . Tar ORANGE COUNxjPLA1ING CO • BOARD • PROM-. MAME CO PLANNING DIRECTOrt. DATE:. APRIL. T.Z. 1985 SUBJECT:, 1985-86 PLANNING DEPARTMENT WORE PROGRAM .• . . The Planning. Department. is in the midst of budget preparations and has been asked to develop. an annual. services- " program.. The program identifiesthe services to be provided: and activities to be performed during the forthcoming 1985-86 budget year.- . • The Planning Department is soliciting comments and . recommendations from the Planning Board. regarding elements it would like to see included in the work program.. This matter will • be discussed at the April. 15 meeting.. Elements which. staff has identified- area listed: below.. They- are separated according to activities which. will carry over from the present. budget year and new activities to be initiated: in 1985-86.. Eramines TO" BE. CARRIED OVER FROM 1984-86 1. Preparation of Toint. Planning Area Plane including University Lake Watershed. Area.. 2.. Preparation of Cane- Creek Watershed. Plan • 3. Watershed. Standards Review/Amendment 4. Subdivision Regulations Update 5.. Mobile Rome Standards Review/Amendment 6. Planned Development Standards Review/Amendment 7. Special Use Standards Review/Amendment —8. implementation of Computdiized'Building Permit System 9. Establishmerit of Stronger Enforcement Procedures a.. Unapproved subdivisions • b.- Zoning violations c. Monitoring of infiltration sites in waterbed areas 12 4. • d.. Monitoring of construction activity along- Intestates: • Ia_ Expansion of Public Relations/Education. Programs. IL. Water/Sewer- Extension. Policy •12. Water Reservoir Study =MEWS TG= BEa INITIATED IE I985-•86 I... Development~ of Computerized. Land: trse• Information. System: Z.. Consolidation of Ordi*lances in Unified. Land.. Use- Code. 3. Development of Methodology for Pre-toning of Property • 4.. Development of Entranceway Policy- for County/Towns S. Area Study - L-85/US 70' interchange- (Eno, Township) 6.. Area Study. - Little River/Cedar Grove Townships T.. Design. Standards. a.. Streets and Pedestrian. Ways . ts., Utilities • c. Stars Drainage d. Erosion Control e.. FIoosd Plain Control. f.. Recreation Facilities • 8.. urban-Rural` Service District Concept • 9:. Thoroughfare Plan. DI. Area Study - Pantry Area (Hillsborough) II. Area Study. - 1-40/I-85. interchange 12'.. Standardized Procedures- Manual 13.. Computer Program - Planning Library 14.. Computer Program - Fiscal Impact Analysis System 15. Study of Impact Fees/Application to Orange County 16. Consolidated' Fee Schedule 17. Recreation Plan. (Recreation Department) 18. Low-Income Housing issues - 19. LESA (Land Evaluation System Analysis) - SCS Coordination 20. Groundwater Protection Study/Underground Storage Tank Survey • I • 22.. Intergovernmental. Effort.% Surrounding Counties The above items are- not Misted is priority.order. With the Board's assistancer a. list of projects can-be developed~. their priorities assigned.. Please feel. free to come with additions for the- list.. • Not aII, of the above items can be carried out ia. one year without addit i'onaL staff.. Thuar elements will. have to be. carefully selected.. If yam will. identify those items which you feel. are most important prior tm the meeting.. it will. expedite discussion• and a decision.. • • • 1985-56 WORK PROGRAM ' - MIND BOARD PRIGRITIF4 ITEM KIZER PILKEY Y.UHASZ SHANKLIN PEARSON HEST : MARGISpN GORDON�—�--- - -----� .-- . _ r-�----,-� (2) Water Resources X ' , (3) Commercial/ in dyaFql Areas Standar(J3 ?� 4•' ,: : (i} Inrill pevelopment X ;' ?• ;' :t;'�r'?`r (2} Watershed S tat . .. ' •' '- - : 1.!''.�.'•' •i. •,:•• :• . . .. ;. ..,•_.• ';,�; (i) Efforcement Prac$dUrP X 14 '_.y;'_.;f }: :` ,° ;: �# :r:,;,;r.t.•,:�i (4) Planned Paveloomept .!• .f ! --j Standards Y;7. 'h',: t•. ' h, :;',:: `;; (5) Water/Sewer EKtensio , •?,::; += ! ' 'i,; ' +` ;;. ,�:;� , `:i;•,L�:''i'':.aii Z'ri: Policy (1) Reservoir Study ( ) Prezoning Methodo P9x ' (3) Thoroughfare Park (1) Recreation } County Airport (3) 1-40 Area Note; Numbers in indicate FPsp¢( eg py itom � . CaACeLTIE 'rout apria ' •leaning Board Minutes. • 12 rt - Planning:. Short Term- Concerns. Public Rearing: Policies DRAFT Gordon reviewed, the public hearing policies.. Kizer expressed concern about using arbitrary means to limit development.. He felt projects should be approved or denied. only on their merit, not on time constraints.. Gordon felt. that what was at issue was time for consideration of projects. Kizer said that public hearings. should only be continued_ for specific items and only if there is a. need for clarification of information already presented.. He continued. that incomplete applications should not be considered. Kizer felt that the public was, not properly informed about the- information requirements for the • Oakwood Estates Plan.. It was the- consensus, of the Board that at the time notices were sent out to property owners, some brief information also be sent telling property owners what they would need to produce as evidence if they- were in opposition to the developers request. - MOTION: Pilkey moved that Planning Staff display a large land use plan wall map at each Planning Board meeting: showing subdivisions and . I-40, as well as the abint Planning. Area. Seconded by Kizer. VOTE': unanimous. Smith suggested that it would possibly take two maps in. order that all inform4ion would be readable. Agenda Item #9 • Long Term Concerns. a. Priorities Gordon requested input from Board members concerning long range planning priorities. Kizer ..oted three items that he felt were extremely important: 1) Water 126 6 11 � 1 .+w�lb. 2) • . Revaluation of commercial/ industrial areas. 3)- Infill• development in major metropolitan areas. Pilkey~ also felt that the number one priority should' be water followed by establishment of stronger enforcement evaluation of the industrial/commercial nodes.. re— =w Ytihasa listed his priorities 'as. followsr. 1) Watershed° standards review amendment: }' ?tanned Development standards amendment Water/Sewer extension policy 4)- New reservoirs 5). Development of methodology for prezoning p° Land Use Plan) if) Throughfare plan ' 7)- Recreation Areas (is County willing to take over these areas for park development?) Shanklin- listed his priorities as follows: L} Watershed standards review 2) Sewer extension policy 3) Planned development - 4) County owned and operated airport • 03e- noted that he would like to see the same amount of money set aside for this project as is set aside- for the County recreation budget.) Pearson stated his priorities as follows: 1) Planned development standards 2) Water/Sewer extension policy 3) Prezoning Best, being new to the Board, commented he. felt it might help to find some means to help staff accomplish some of these tasks. • • He noted: that anything: to do with Z-40 should be high. priority.. Margison had concerns as follows: I) Water/Sewer extension policy 21 Prezoning 3)' Thoroughfare plan 4) r 4a' - Gordon noted. that one thing she felt that the Board' should be very clear about was the concept of what. Orange County should 'look like* in the future.. She was especially interested in seeing I-40 area plans.. She felt the next thing that was needed was to provide the infrastructure= to support this development and coordinate- efforts for a water/sewer extension policy and a thoroughfare plan.. She also expressed a. desire for standards regarding industrial/commercial development and Iocation. Another concern was the revision of the Zoning Ordinance in regards to planned developments and special use permits.. • Discussion on the e pres rvatzon. of farm. land fo l .owed.. Pilkey noted that nothing• was mentioned under the long. range concerns about the preservation of farmland.. Gordon commented that prime farmland needed to be preserved for future growth. Kizer also noted that all around the world there seems to be a temporary excess in the supply of food and that in the future this will perhaps not be so. Thus, preservation of farmland is still an important issue. Agenda Item #10 Planning: Staff Work Program 1985-86 13C 13 Presentation by Collins.. He Noted that he concurred with the basic priorities as stated• by Planning Board members. Land- Records and Tax. Office are working on a. new set of aerial maps for the Chapel Hill/Carrboro area which can be utilized by all three jurisdictions for the land use information system.. In: regard"-to joint planning Collins felt we needed to decide what was urban.. versus rural.. He fdltr too- that staff needed to address: administrative- procedures.. Fee schedules- needed to be revaluated to see if they are self supporting. Collins further noted he felt the Fiscal Impact Analysis System• was important in regard to the long range impact on the County as far as schools, water and sewer systems and the cost and benefits to the county.. He noted the twelve elements carried over from 1984-85 .work program should be cleared out first, due to the fact that some of these elements were ' carry-overs from previous budget years,. The elements of the- 1985-86: work program that he would. stress are as follows: Thoroughfare Plan Prezoning Issue (the design-a.gn standards and unified land use code are involved in this issue) Land Use Information System Smith noted that many of these elements were in the final stages of completion.. Gordon inquired of Collins if the Planning Board could do something to help clear up the elements that had been carried over simply due to the fact that Board of Commissioners had set other priorities for Planning Staff. Collins responded that it would take a great deal of staff work rk and time to get items prepared P for discussion with the Board or other committees. Collins noted one concern that he has which seems to interfere with the work program is the number of development applications. Considerable time is also being spent with citizens explaining the • 14 procedures they must approval.. Y' go through for development Smith noted that she felt the mobile home policy directive from the Board of Commissioners would turn- into a project that would• take considerable staff time.. Smith also stated. that it was a directive from Board. of • County Commissioners to write informational brochures.. Gordon • reminded planning board members of the special meeting April 29th. The meeting adjourned 10:30 p.m.. • • • 1 ( . •. . "- ORANGE COUNTY 132 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS •ACTION AGENDA ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NO./E13 MEETING DATE July 1 , 1985 SUBJECT: Legal Services Contract DEPARTMENT: Social Services (PUBLIC HEARING: YES X NO ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas M. Ward proposed contract . County Attorney Approval Letter PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH - 732-8181 • HILLSBOROUGH - 732-9361 CHAPEL HILL - 967-9251 MEBANE - 227-2031 • DURHAM - 688-7331 . PURPOSE: To continue' contrac.tural agreement with firm o;f •Northern, Little and Thibaut to provide special legal *services not otherwise provided by county government: ' • • NEED: To assist the agency administer its duties 'under the General Statutes of North Carolina with 'respect to providing •Protective services to both children and adults . Attorney Ii paxes petitions • . and represents agency fn court, and acts as consultant on interpretation of the General Statutes in individual case situations . IMPACT: This agency has entered into' such. a contract for many years to assist with the performance of its duties . The court appoints " •attorneys for most clients which necessitates staff representation by an attorney. - • RECOMMENDATION(S): The attached contract for Fiscal year 1985-86 is recommended by the Social Services board. I STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF ORANGE • THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this the 1st day of July, 1985, by and between NORTHEN, LITTLE & THIRAUT, Orange County, North Carolina, a ' partnership organized under the laws of the State of North Carolina engaging in the practice of law, hereinafter referred to as ATTORNEYS, and ORANGE COUNTY, hereinafter referred to as the COUNTY: W I T N E S S E T H : WHEREAS the Orange County Department of Social Services (hereinafter referred to as the DEPARTMENT), has need of special legal services, not otherwise provided.by County government agencies, in connection with its • I services to needy and dependent persons in Orange County, the administration • of its functions under the provisions of Article 8, Chapter 110 of the General Statutes of North Carolina and other laws of the State and representation of the DEPARTMENT, its caseworkers and employees before the various courts and agencies of the State of North Carolina; and Ii WHEREAS, it is the desire of the COUNTY and ATTORNEYS to enter into a I contract, one with the other, for the purposes and considerations as net forth herein for a period of July 1, 1985 through June 30, 1986; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual terms and agreements hereinafter set forth, the COUNTY and ATTORNEYS do contract, each with the other, as follows: 1. That ATTORNEYS sbi 1 perform such services and reveler such advice to the DEPARTMENT on such occasions as shall be required by the Director of 1 the DEPARTMENT and with the approval of said Director, employees and caseworkers shall require the services of ATTORNEYS. 2. That ATTORNEYS shall be compensated for all services rendered in connection with Paragraph No. 1 above based on an hourly rate for services performed of Forty-Five Dollars ($45.00) per hour, such hours and amounts to be furnished to the County Finance Officer or his designate for payment. j The ATTORNEYS shall be compensated for activities engaged in by an attorney which are outside the realm of legal services, and including attendance at professional meetings, seminars, and the like, at a rate up to NORTHEN.LITTLE &THIBAUT Thirty-Five Dollars ($35.00) per hour, but not exceeding the maximum of ATTORNEYS AT LAW A„W.rRANRt.IN ST. One-Hundred and Seventy-Five Dollars ($175.00) per day. CHAPEL MILL.N,C,17314 • • 134 -2- • The ATTORNEYS shall also be compensated for and reimbursed for the services of clerks and legal assistants hired by them to assist them in the performance of their duties to the DEPARTMENT, based on an hourly rate of services performed of Thirty Dollars ($30.00) per hour. The COUNTY shag be responsible for all costs and expenses incurred in the performance of the services rendered the COUNTY pursuant to this Contract. All costs and expenses advanced by ATTORNEYS on bphslf of COUNTY shall be reimbursed to ATTORNEYS. • 3. That ATTORNEYS shall keep an itemized record of work performed for the DEPARTMENT on a case-by-case basis and shall submit its bill therefor showing a breakdown of those services performed and the coat. 4. That this Agreement shag exist and continue from July 1, 1985 to and including June 30, 1986, unless sooner terminated by thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the COUNTY and ATTORNEYS have hereunto signed this Agreement in duplicate originals, one of which is retained by each party hereto and either of which is sufficient as the original. ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA By: DONALD G. WILLROIT Chair Orange County Board of Commissioners Attest: � I Beverly Blythe 1 Clerk of the Orange County Board of Commissioners NORTHEN, LITTLE & THIBAUT II Attorneys at Law J.ANDERSON LITTLE This instrument has been preaudited in the manner required by the NORTHEN.LITTLE &THIBAUT Local Government Budget and Fiscal Control Act. AITJRNETi AT LAW •71 W.FRANKLIN ST. CHAPEL NitL.N.0.17714 GORDON R. BAKER, Orange County Finance Officer 4 ft COLEMAN, BERNHOLZ, DICKERSON, BERNHOLZ, GLEDHILL & HARGRAVE ATTORNEYS AT LAW 110 CHURTON STREET HILLSBOROUGH,N.C.27278 919-732-2196 919-942-8000 CHAPEL HILL OFFICE SUITE 20.FRANELIN BUILDING 137 E.FRANKLIN STREET CHAPEL HILL,N.C.27514 919-m-nm . ALONZO B.COLEMAN, 7R- STEVEN A.BERNHOLZ June 7, 1985 DONALD R.DICKERSON ROGER 13.BEBNHOLZ GEOFFREY E.GLEDHILL DOTIGLAS HARGRAVE MARTIN J.BERNHOLZ RICHARD J.SNIDER,JR. JANE G.de LISSOVOY G.NICHOLAS HERMAN LYNN A.ANDREWS • Of Courwel BONNER D.SAWYER Albert Kittrell (1902-1972) Assistant Manager . Orange County Offices • 106 E. Margaret Lane . • Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 I , Dear Albert: The contract between Orange County and the law I c firm of Northen, Little and Thibaut is proper in form. The only change I can see from last year's contract is an increase in the hourly rate for paralegal time from $25.00 to $30.00 per hour. Very truly yours, 41110 • 411111r."'11 eo fre, . Gledhill GEG/lsg 1111 • savormsik ;i.,:• ,•7; • -•. • . --., ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS • ,,.. 106 EAST MARGARET LANE . . HILLSBOROUGH, N. C. • • 27278 MQWZOAREr 4 BEN LL July 10, 1985 OYD • E.MARSHALL -", NORMAN WALKER DON WILLS= • . -: •t. ... . • J. Anderson Little Northen, Little & Thibaut .1 431 W. Frankiin Street Chapel Hill, NC 27514 i,.. .. Dear Mr. Little: • Attached for your files is a copy of the agreement between ,.-. Northen, Little & Thibaut and. Orange County that was approved at the July 1, 1985 Board of Commissioners' meeting. - • If you have any questions,„please call my office. ' A -. Thank you. . ..,..•4:-.;; ,....::1,,,,:_, . .1-:, 5.sincerely, :,...-, .,;:r,f':•..-";;;;;;;.,. .: . .*.i...•;,:-.. ,-.:,.: .--*."-.1? ;.-----.: ....f..V..-... . : -e:: 4".V..:Irre4C'''':"•f:? :.-•-7:-:-- --'""'--'t-'• . • • ...' . : .1.3.1.,•••7,7.r',7;6;,e...7:3......ii-;.1 .-7...":'.:7...:;r:-.::y., :. • ....... ....,,-.. .... ..111,rs.. Beverly A. Blythe, Clerk '''.---,-OrangeTounty Board2oP.'Commissioners . .141!..-.1.1..;';:l. f,. ..?-4:1:-..;•-•:.-.4.---.'-':-.. .. :---.:-....,"----..p.:* -..- ". ‘--.....-:: ':'''..f:' ...2 7'.,. I .t'.:;;;'7-!:' 1 .V:.•!6-..:1,-1:. (1 i....:•••3. 7 *:'s-...::!--; 1.'V!:.._, ''..::.:..: -,::,...%':::t.: . ibab :;:,'?";::::.7•7-:1-.:',.%,;:1:•':;:i.;n4i....;' ......; !. : ..!„...;*". :• 7....:!: ;.;'.' : ;`---..-.Z-3.2.,..4, I ' ' File 'A.2...::•?..:,.:',,.,:z::Is=....,:..;0::;:4,- ,.. .;:,,,,...1._-",-24•2.-_1--•::::',..,---;1:Kf:t.:'.:::-....-.,,-:, ;.•,.....,:.....i..4.;: itf,:.e.c.a.!1.:.;e4%4gt.„.4_,..--,,......- •...- -.:,,:,7 . .4.,...1. I . 1 . • . 1 . I . I I I . I - , I STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA • • COUNTY OF ORANGE . • • THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this the'lst day of July, 1985, by and between NORTHEN, LITTLE & THIBAUT, Orange County, North Carolina, a • partnership organized under the laws of the State of North Carolina engaging in the practice of law, hereinafter referred to as ATTORNEYS, and ORANGE COUNTY, hereinafter referred to as the COUNTY: W I T NE S S E T H : WHEREAS the Orange County Department of Social Services (hereinafter referred to as the DEPARTMENT) has need of special legal services, not otherwise provided by County government agencies, in connection with its services to needy and dependent persons in Orange County, the administration of its functions under the provisions of Article 8, Chapter 110 of the General Statutes of North Carolina and other laws of the State and representation of the DEPARTMENT, its caseworkers and employees before the various courts and agencies of the State of North Carolina; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the COUNTY and ATTORNEYS to enter into a contract, one with the other, for the purposes and considerations as set • forth herein for a period of July 1, 1985 through June 30, 1986; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutri=1 terms and agreements hereinafter set forth, the COUNTY and ATTORNEYS do contract, each with the other, as follows: 1. That ATTORNEYS shall perform such services and render such advice to the DEPARTMENT on such occasions as shall be required by the Director of the DEPARTMENT and with the approval of said Director, employees and caseworkers shall require the services of ATTORNEYS. 2. That ATTORNEYS shall be compensated for all services rendered in II connection with Paragraph No. 1 above based on an hourly rate for services performed of Forty-Five Dollars ($45.00) per hour, such hours and amounts to be furnished to the County Finance Officer or his designate for payment. The ATTORNEYS shall be compensated for activities engaged in by an attorney which are outside the realm of legal services, and including NoRTHEN,IITTLE attendance at professional meetings, seminars, and the like, at a rate up to &THIBAUT �L� ATTORNEYS AT LAW Thirty-Five Dollars ($35.00) per hour, but not exceeding the maximum of 431 W.FRANKLIN ST. CHAPEL HILL N.C.E7514 One-Hundred and Seventy-Five Dollars ($175.00) per day. • -2- • The ATTORNEYS shall also be compensated for and reimbursed for the services of clerks and legal assistants hired by them to assist them in the performance of their duties to the DEPARTMENT, based on an hourly rate of services. performed of Thirty Dollars ($30.00) per hour. The COUNTY shall be responsible for all costs and expenses incur*ed in the performance of the services rendered the COUNTY pursuant to this Contract. All costs and expenses advanced by ATTORNEYS on behalf of COUNTY shall be reimbursed to ATTORNEYS. • 3. That ATTORNEYS shall keep an itemized record of work performed ' for the DEPARTMENT on a case-by-case basis and sball submit its bill therefor showing a breakdown of those services performed and the cost. 4. That this Agreement shall exist and continue from July 1, 1985 to and including June 30, 1986, unless sooner terminated by thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the COUNTY and ATTORNEYS have hereunto signed this Agreement in duplicate originals, one of which is retained by each party hereto and either of which is sufficient as the original. ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA DONALD G. WILLHOIT Chair Orange County Board of Commissioners Attest: Beverly Bl ' .e Clerk of the Orange County Board of Commissioners NORTHEN, LITTLE & THIBAUT Attorneys at Law — . _..._ - LJ�DERSON LITTLE This-instrument has been preaudited in the manner required by the NORTH EN,LITTLE k THIBAUT Local Government Budget and Fiscal Control Act. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4E1 W.FRANKLIN 57. /////// ,� CHAPEL H11.1.,N.G.27816 � GORDON R. BAKER, Orange County Finance Officer .13E ORANGE ccumy BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agenda ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Item No. F.14 Meeting Date: duLY 1, 1985 SUBJECP: EXTENSION OE' CALDWELL FIRE INSURANCE DISTRICT DEPARTMENT: COUNTYNUAGKR PUBLIC HEARING: Yes __NO ATTACHMENNS): INFORMATTCNCONTACT: MANAGER'S OFFICE X501 TELEPHONE NICER: • YES Hillsborough - 732-8181 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 Mebane - 227-2031 Durham - 688-7331 PURPOSE: TO consider extending the Caldwell Fire Insurance Rated District from four road miles to five road miles. NEED: Christopher BPst, Caldwell Volunteer Fire Department, has requested extension of the insurance rated district to allow more residents in the fire district to receive reduced fire insurance costs. IMPACT: I , RECORMENDATION(S): Approve extending the Caldwell Fire Insurance Rated District from four miles to five miles. DEAR BEVERLY, ENCLOSED IS THE NEW CALDWELL FIRE DISTRICT WITH A EVE MILE LIMIT. THE BOCC MUST APPROVE THIS RATING BEFORE THE NEW INSURANCE RATING CAN GO INTO AFFECT. WHEN IT IS APPROCED, I WOULD APPRECIATE A COPY OF THE MINUTES STATING ITS APPROVAL. I WILL USE THIS APPROVAL TO REQUEST THAT THE NEW CHANGE TAKE AFFECT WITH THE ISO. THIS WILL THEN REDUCE FIRE INSURANCE COSTS TO AIMOST ALL OF OUR FIRE DISTRICT. IF YOU OR MR. THOMPSON WOULD LI1,E ANY HELP IN OBTAINING THE NEW FIVE MILE RATING FOR ANY OF THE OTHER FIRE D:STRICT PLEASE LET ME KNOW. I WOULD BE EELIGHTED TO TRY AND HELP GETTING FURTHER INSURANCE REDUCTIONS IN THE COUNTY. THANK YOU FOR TIME IN THIS MATTER, AND AGAIN, LET ME KNOW IF I CAN BE OF ANY HELP TO YOU. SINCERELY, FA4r-- CHRISTOPHER E. BEST TREASURER,BOARD OF DIRECTORS CALDWELL kin 12.7- the Feb- )2_00 e t 1 rif Ai ectictioei/ /ie Di5411 �.3 1 O►^qn 5 e Co. ,/ , FIre(.5-XI on y 1,i.° Scale /-_'/mn%. -, 0 - - r ,� / O �/ 1523 1527 - 528 1001r I 8 4 - Lk$( -1 r My �r �,, `0 1'b / 1531 ti • ! lA 2 1529 kph - I E S.... , y 1524 '� 1525) ∎• - i) 16 1 4,..Q 1530 ' s �:.,.. ■�"�O 4'C7 1515�.1 6 ..�. / 1528 , b r /r.�: 1517 N 1522 .9 1553 ��`'1 1517 `' -6' / 1 I 1 A 1534 \ ,+r ; �� �'� 1524 a.••"""%•..,.,„„„„/S �'��. . � 1518 `` + = 1519 / 1520„r∎ • 1534 r`,.,..r�"1 h t,rr�.��rr�, 11�� ( . , - .- • .1535 -. r. 11i: 1508 0 -� 9 1538: •Q elf I '741' 1 A'.: S % 1536% ♦\ 1 P ♦30 %• i iODi ?e.."�.' ..,,��ti a; 1521 'Lis l 2 / i Caldwell i 543 1508 j ' .1 1 • v 1581 % .1536 ` / r.D. Mr 0�` 1 1 �,r 1 1 1�jf ....�1 • .+'^� 1 fir....l' 541 � `"�'" ;� ` 1537 •. 15x3 /' M. `� is RIVER '• . • 9 FAS '...o�r� 3.3 • 544 1520 « ."►....,. ' 1 „'� ■......,......w ' 1579 /.. 1 1541 O 1542a •-0 /",',! 1003 i 538 1549.9 11597 1 36°10� I`y ii/A/412;iiiii"1.8 ,4 1541 /. (tfi 1 1003 / i 5 CJ 40 j :� r/5chle .''. � - I« 15y 1539 • I 4',.....................,. 'a )h 0 I 61 1 1552 O 1550 t• . 1. 1538 1131604 8 1 1573 .1 .---. I 13E CALDWELL FIRE DISTRICT Orange County Beginning at point (1) on N. C. Highway 157 at the Orange-Person County Line; thence easterly along the Orange-Person-County Line to point (2) at its intersection with Road 1528; thence southeasterly to point (3) on Road 1531, 0.7 mile northwest of its intersection with N. C. Highway 57; thence northeasterly to point (4) on N. C. Highway 57 at its intersection with the Orange-Person-Durham County Line; thence southerly along the Orange-Durham County Line to point (5) at its intersection with Road 1003; thence southwesterly to point (6) at the inter- section of Roads 1538 and 1573; thence southwesterly to point (7) on Road 1548, 0.5 mile southeast of its intersection with Road 1540, excluding property on Roads 1539 and 1538 between this and the preceding point; thence northwesterly along the centerline of Road 1548 to point (8) on Road 1548, 0.5 mile northwest of its intersection with Road 1540; thence northwesterly to point (9) on Road 1548, 1.2 - miles southeast of its intersection with N. C. Highway 57, excluding property on the north side of Road 1548 between this and the preceding point; thence north- westerly along the centerline of Road 1548 to point (10) on Road 1548 at its inter- section with the Little River Township Line, approximately 1.0 mile northwest of the intersection of N. C. Highway 57 and Road 1548; thence northerly along the Little River Township Line to point (11) at its intersection with Road 1515, approx- imately 1.4 miles northwest of the intersection of Roads 1515 and 1516; thence east- erly to point (1), the beginning. This description describes an area of Orange County pursuant to General Statute 153A-233 for insurance grading purposes only. JG/bph • • ORANGE COUNTY CONE IISSIONERS 106 E/WT MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGH, N. C. 27278 Mo3E9 CAREY DEB LLOYD E.martskLAYA EIOECLIAN WAL10311 • DON W1LLHOIT CERTIFICATION OF R:MUTES I, Beverly A. Blythe, Clerk to the Board of Orange County Commissioners, do HEREBY CERTIFY that the attached is a true copy of so much of the proceedings of the Board of Commissioners for said County at a meeting - • held the 1st day of July, 1985, as relates in any way to the Extension of Caldwell Fire Insurance District, and that said proceedings are recorded in the Minute Book of the Minutes of said Board for said date. WITNESS my hand and seal of said County this the 16th day of'- July, 1985. • • . -,"<"&-71 • • Beverly A. :$ ytlie. Cler the Orange s.County.Board of Commissi.oners • • ? Agenda It era-.FY4. :Extenszongof__Caidwei,,Fire Insurance 'District Action taken: Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Walker to extend the Caldwell Fire Insurance Rated District from four • road miles to five road miles. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. • • SEAL 1 • • • • . • . - g - -• . ORANGE COUNTY - - 14C • • BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA • ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NO.F1$ - MEETING DATE' July i, ..19A5.-_-' . - . - . . • • : . • • • . SUBJECT; Appeal of tax appraisal on the home of Mr. Roy D. Stone . - . '•-• i ' . - • DEPARTMENT: Tax Supervisor - PUBLIC HEARING: YES , i , NO .1 . . - • . ; • • • • - ' 1 ATTACHMENT(S): Letter from Mr. stone INFORMATION CONTACT: - . . • dopy of Property Record of Mr. • Store's property. Copy of Mr. .. . PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH - 732-8181 Stone.' 1985 Tax Listing Abstract . ' HILLSBOROUGH - 732-9361 - . . . - . CHAPEL HILL 7 967-9251 - ... - • - MEBANE - 227-2031- - . - • • . . DURHAM - 688-7331 PURPOSE: - - - . • - • • . : . . . - • - • . : Mr. R.D. Stone takes exception- to the appraisal of his prolierty . . located -on Tax Map -I.D. 4.45c.A.:4-, and would like to present his appeal . .t6 the :Board of County Commissioners. - - .• _ . - • . • ". . • . _ . . - - . - • - ' • - . , • •. . . . . - • - ' NEEDi . . • .... - . . . - • •. . - - Mr. Stone made his request for a hearing 'Within the required 30 ' .. . • days from. his Notice of _Change. in Value.. - • . .- . . . . -.. . . . - . . • . • - . . . . • - . • . . . . -• • - . • . -. • . . - - • . . . . . • . .. . • . . . • • IMPACT: •IMPACT: - . , • . . - . . • . . . -...- : - : • . ' . - - - - : . . .. . . . . . . . . . • - . - . . - . RECOMMENDATION(S): - Mr. Stone's property was appraised using the Schedule of Values adopted for the 1981 revaluation and an outside inspection of his home. When Mr. Stone made his appeal, our Chief Appraiser, Mr. George Meyer, was sent out for an inside inspection and Mr. Stone would not let Mr. Meyer see the inside of his home; therefore, I cannot recommend any- change. — $1321=ammi....• i . 1 ., - -,-. ,4-t- CA C-I t -t --C . t -t ( -t. it -t. -.( c -I _____________ _.._____________ • • - 141 ', f ,-.... ., ,,.......4,‘ , 2 1 I 1 _11;11/ 441 AI 41...'341.C""". ''.!1 4-C A.----t"'.'7 . ,,_ ___-4,)/.0.: / 5- 716t1 -4-'1-15 44,7:444. 1. 1. ..., _. _ -0. _t_s Aio t7i,e_i_ .e9-_5__ ,/—___n-g_" .., /14 GC a.1,\ ct--4.skef4,._, 1.144 ‘..01- Lc.1 -- a:-•#._____Ifiat "Id _____ h __ 14... e)./g____;-1 ,. . 1 , 4.A.A 4y ; °a s 41.40934... - r ,I! ,. kit,Se i X 72 el Ii! . ec/Ild'Aete,o.oe,i(4 g Cf - 1 1 . t • 1 ;• . ; . . . . I : '• ! t'l..-A;4--.. • ,1--, i _ * , — - 1-4,:• .. . •••_'%.. t . • __________ _ _- ^------ • I . I ' f. IwP M41�G NLR A 1111 4 �K�sN [y VI90 "ft W50 '0'mYWy IM STAGECOACH RUN i:_ LION 1185 1 Or 1 ACCOUNT TLLx CENSUS ZQNE ZONE PATE BOOK PAGE STAMPS ORAL. OUILOINO1tiRMItRECORtf �j�—�—Alma°[Rp+ 'MNI: STATUS C1A55 JURISDICTION "ION ( 08/03/81 369 222 19.00 Si7551 9873-44—:3712 MIF ��jr/1L • t.� 0 ARIA• ottUP HC Cttt.tt. 1,N. F1i. t 00. low. SX, 301111NG No.AMi. N11.iJl, 011.FlN. Clt L,DNit ttaxl N(A,A i0 MIPIAQ GMDE 13pit P A [DUD. p+,E. HAII. Yljij( NI• ID !i. AREA NN M[A11lE t-sltpl11 m ai t FMrnA 211111 NP. DEP, ' 1.511111 FAO. +N ii F•tR"uE p IPIIR p D R.IUP NR.tWD D•DDY WRtt Eep n19ini! ,�q.} W ND.AAiiV^ ArlFq e 1•TLettAMNI !fl N•MASDIL M�IASpN S 35 A.GAMQ.t�V1,[�AEtAt E.PANti tnum nyvn � i�2t t w�txn NU.tn. A ALC /• ' ES-.� t�iNP Ay tSTDNEp 50 M•MANS fl•PDtI it ilm• 7CUts�t6 Cal ILL L•tAliirftAi (( f.lbPi SMULIIdAM �giln ,D A•NULT. IDD% 3.5122 [�%• IGTB F•ttAl T•1 U•UR 110511 x wim�t l�nfaN 1��6r,M 72 A l 773 — D,_Mg ...�... a 1 10 P c 224 P+010 10 4 ! B+00 t rot 1 CUT r, r U K + L=u� D[MIYNUAIYARDIMFMKAVVIS Nll[JIBt1Rw700 IAUUSCM1RM1[DI'0 _ AOAa UIILINEF �• �• --�' •'— d y CA•GARAGE 'SW-SWIMMING POOL iMt'RUVING E%CH.LENt LOW PAVLD SLVlER l0-LIVING/GARAGE A•POURED CONC.OR CUNITE STATIC GQQDD HIGH NAVEL ,�yATER 0 1- Ui-UTILITY BUILDING FORM B-VINYL OtCUNING AL4=RACE R ROLLING DIRT tCT. BR•GREE14HOUSE 1C-TENNIS COURTS BLIGHTED POOR MOUNTAIN CURB E CUT.. ELL X O MH-MOBILE NOME PERCIP, SIDEWALK AN LEVEL Wout Avoid GSM1FARM AUHAR KS idEAN TO 2-0PEN SHLD 3-GEN.PURPOSE BLDG 4-STEEL FRAME 1i-OURNSET BLDG. 6-CORN CRIB I-DAIVE•TIIt1U CORN CRIB Z�• 0-MILK 110115E 9•MII K PARLOR 10•POLIL IRY HDITSE 11-GEN.PURPOSE BARN 12-DAIRY BARN 13-SILOS 14-METAL GRAIN TANK Q t5-SHACK 16-TODACCO DARN 17-PACK BARN 18-BULK BARN 19-SIABLE 20•11OG NOOSE O Q. CU[M Dt5tRiP11U•I RATE FAN31.UI NN FLMR Mo GRAUL PNYs.trp.I LWtt.w.I VALUL :-------------------60------------------- �. m r S D B r2 L 4 D 6 Qh j-------------------6t�------------------- O A S ————— —— --—— o —L it IT 01 a IANo SCIIEoult TOTAL n Lots TYPE 1 TMNt 1 REAR TAT FIG UNIt Rau EFF MPTII I DEPUITAC MNECLI Aril VALUE REMARKS RESIDENTIAL B5000,S I A REAR ,4 A i COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGF ACR[Ard tT14 No of ACRE" VAll ------ ! VC110MAN11 ! — 3PASTDRt V It - ltvpws : 2 14 E 14 3WASTHATU) 3COMM POAL '?1,589 II-144.mu WI I h A TAIL LISTER—BRING THIS FORM WITH YOU r 8 5 14 L'' ORANGE COUNTY �,_'- REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX USTINGS AS OF JANUARY 1,1985 • ' I 9 MPORTANT:THIS FORM IS NOT FOR LISTING BUSINESS PERSONAL PROPERTY . DO NOT WRITE IN SHADED AREAS M AGE []MaRRtER .;„: .TOWNSHW • - .ETC• • —SEX F I�Ei� 0 OIVONNCED SOC.G�') 244581 CK 2 I) 2406 4022 ' �'fIL.1.SBORDI, , Ft - .SEPARATED OTHER :— • —NAME OF EMPLOYER OR HOW SELF EMPLOYE) % ... • . s .• .t . . PREvro TOWNSHIP LIMP • c� -• _ TO AVOID:O%1 TE°CHARGE:'HIS-FORM•MUSTBE' OMPLETED.SIGNED AND MAILED OR.RETURNED 110>LATER THAN-JANUARY11 1985: 10:7AX SUPERVISOR`-=20B;.SOUTH.-CAMERON'STREET 'JHLLSBORDUGH,'NC 27278 - ACCOUNT:..,4.. _ 58122 T ONE NUMBER BETWEEN • , 4"'-'-- - ' 4 72 • NUMBER 7;? -ii..,,-=*-•--, . FOU RS OF 8110 AM to 5:00 PM o C- NAME LAST FIRSL DIDDLE., Rc U _ _. tt ti, r'. ••• sE. STONE R#I#3ER'T: U .._._. _ �' R� 10124 ECT ' ANNETTE ,S 017 - i� _ r_- •ESS ADDRESS . •D--DOGS ._ �z . FEB la _=:1.4:1-.--,,4_ �: SECT RT! BOX. 12O_ . _ , _ .. __.. • .__.._ . .. - • l l Im&HO .:. I ND;.. - .��.w,,��yf�t� •.. .l NAILS i • HILLSEI#:lRDUG NC 27278 .. . - - — IBM N;RM�4R • -_-.- '_... '•rbCtX!x.77 G_.1. i . • • ' '=E==:t:�PPRCEC(DENT:NO..., MAP REFEREN(5:'-77 y . ":"REAL PROPEITIY DESCRIPTION.• . . . _"'BRACT:`.-:-.s`ACaESiLt117: •�:ASSEeSED:VAL - r :�:, : 5C - ►..4�:t :•42•=B L=H-'SEO.12:..-STAGECt9 ` #•rr ' R( • • "873.- =��18•,•_- •-z'4:'•.�"• t�^H;�~•:4Ey41'�''r-t?:� 3:,. c ..G—MOBILE HOMES,BOATS E.MOTORS,TRUCK CAMPERS 8 COVERS . 'Fa• ' '' •;E-1-•5�c,.aF�DwH•kI�° ..'�3 l�Q,�:'= :-:._;•.__ :.::—..' ::_ I,ES +� F MOTOR VEHICLES,CAMPER&TRAILERS(UTILIBOAT TRAII-ER) WJEa M YEAR •MART?&SIZE •P .• C05T• TA'OFflEE USE e�S©^% •- YEAR MAKE.STYLE&SIZE VEHICLE I.D.NO. •TAX OI�iCE USE :I" • , -17.,c.:30... :.•IUILi THON-•'> o x.73 . CHEV TX, ' 1GCEIKLI4C ' gqo • • • ', - • . '_ tas 76 TOY° 4S • . RT10 O1L �,/Q`2Q. •' � TOTAL You Of(: -�� ��f('., .. ... ._ .._. ....•_,.�,,_•L • I. • - ' • .. • •i?ry,'scd:•r 7IIDL .'9 D EMP • ASFA. .. 1-; .,.:::�, .1r01;: ' • `* H—FOR LANDOWNERS ONLY _�`Fa.Jt++ Yi i �+'.'•'�"' ARE THERE MOBILE HOME LOCATED ON THIS r4• -Il j iD_ � . _.. ' - LAND? YES 0 NO NUMBER ..- " .,-...-- - • • i "- IF"YES%UST OWNERS' ES&ADDRESSES BROW '• ' • • 1z -_-- NAPE 5 ADDRESS • _ W NAME 3 ADDRESS - TIREIITHE NAME OF •• •• .. . • • - ..• •NAME&ADDRESS • • . • • `j�: 4 1 o NAME Q ADDRESS • _. '�`F't y,+: NAME b ADDRESS I . J • r •• HOUSEHOLD FURNISHINGS • • . . I— DO YOU OWN YOUR OWN RESIDENCE? • YES 11 NO 0 ••- • DWELLING TYPE: HOUSE 91 COND.0 MOBILE HOME 0 APARTMENT 0 - 4--a.DO YOU ACCEPT 5%OF THE ASSESSED DWELLING VALUE AS TAX VALUE OF HOUSEHOLD FURNISHINGS?(SEE El ABOVE) • YES? NO 0 • ••—- b.DR,DO YOU ACCEPT 6 TIMES YOUR MONTHLY RENT AS TAX VALUE OF HOUSEHOLD FURNISHINGS? YES 0 NO 0. MONTH Y RENT; - TffE TAx DEPARTMENT WILL'ENi81 TI E'AFPFipPR1ATE AMMNTT.AS lidlslDIOLD RIRNiSHiNGS(TFRS ENTER TOTAL L--L.OCATIONOF PERSONAL PROPERTYIF YOU DO NOT LIVE NYOUR LAND.6IVENAN' CLOONNG FURNITURE.TELEVISIONS.STEREOS,RADIO&WASHERS.MUSKS,SEWING MACHINES.RODS, E511MATE0 FifSALE t LoH ING,SILVERWARE,CLOCKS,VACUUM CLEANERS.FREEZERS,MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS.CAMERA- OF LANDOWNER OR NAME OF MOBILE PARK OH APT.AS OF JANUARY 1,1985 PROJEC O S.TYPEWICTER 1A1.CUf.ATORS.01AMOtA75.WATCHES AND OTHER HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES.) VALUE OF tf0U5EN0I D - • K—IF YOU DO NOT ACCEPT-..1*„COMPLETE THIS SECTION: i PON NAME '- K-TOTAL ONLY D.I OWN NO HUDSEHOLD FURNISHINGS WHICH SHOULD BE OR THIS LISTING.0 ,.. b.'RESIDE IN A FURNISHED HOUSE 0 MOBILE HOME 0 APARTMENT 0 ROOM❑ $ •:. - ': _ . .. '•• • r-1 UVE WITH PARENTS 0 PARENTS'NAZI. cRYISTATElDP �_.. , M—RESALE VALUE OF ALL OTHER PERSONAL PROPERTY(NOT INCLUDED IN SECTION`J-DR-K"ABOVE) N--=NOTES IF NEEDED _ j_: .• PLEASE LIST RESALE VALUE OF THE FOLLOWING IN ADOERON TO _ . .• • • SECHO J'OR-IC ABOVE _ . .. . .w . cj•1 7 Y • . BICYCLES MINOTIKES • GARDEN OR LAWN EQUIPMENT • a ra ' _j?"rTOTAI P S 0 :. ROOM AIR CONDITIONING UNITS - ti:,...:-+ """",. • CAMPING OR GOLF EOUIPMERT . • . t'••s,,',:".... • CARPENTER OR MECHANIC TOOLS :IAN.; ' • • • , .• CHAIN SAW '' •- • FIREARMS_ • .3176 0-NEW CONSTRUCTION OR IMPROVEMENTS FROM JAN.1.19:- ALL OTHER PROPERTY NOT SPECIFIED - _ THROUGH DEC.31.1984(DESCRIBE IMPROVEMENTS) ,•,- UNDER PENALTIES PRESCRIBED BY LAW.I HEREBY AFFIRM THAT TO ' ,- i. USTTAKFA'• . THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF THIS LISTING,INCLUDING ,'.. ANY ACCOMPANYING STATEMENTS,INVENTORIES.SCHEDULES,AND ? f't-I`-'r.- OTHER INFORMATION IS TRUE AND COMPLETE. T 'SEE REVERSE SIDE DATE OI Y�`= IB!CONSTRUCTi COST WHEN COMPLETED �( t �N SIGNATURE azik-.e.;,.4.44ze, .,., 1985 ,x • ffil m • • • - • . - . u. ' ''gagamto9 DO NOT WRITE IN SHADED AREAS—FOR TAX-OFFICE USE ONLY • a ''' ;'.:.. . - . - IMPORTANT:THIS FORM IS NOT FOR LISTING BUSINESS PERSONAL PROPERTY i 4 • •••. . .. . • . . . . _. - , . _ -- - . - , . -• - ,• -.-17.::...."•, -.-• . -, • ---•---•--•••• • - . • , . _..... . TYPE '- ' MAKE---*- 'L''' .'•'i "--- ;-"• MODEL'::"----- ' rudriksni - •- 'COST--' TAX OFFICE II, • • ...:... ....mAcTolis... .. imisi . ..... . ,. •.! ... :.il. .-... .- • '.!:-: ••:;-;• • -:' .."..' ••• ' .74... -•.:.".."1..--74.::441-14 ''"-..1:-. AIRPLANE . i' •: -. - :- ,r■:( ..-..* - •": . ----"..t''''• ::.• --.77-- - - ;- • . • • - .- .;,, e'.-.33.,e4..441:-. _ ..' .! 111111*1 . ..•, ; • • .. :. • • ,•;, ...----...... - ...................._._ .,a.. • ,fr -. " , . . _ , : ' : • - . ,. • 3 411%.2.,•`.. . • . .7.:,-,s3crAi:--:X=*:' --- - • - . •-:- -. ;,".--- -Ii 1 ii...• 7. . . ■ •- . 1_4. 6:5.: ..t.) • -:- .-v••71 - • "_--- ::;., " • .........-, .-.:.*•I ‘ - . BULIDOZERS .... ..... . .__ _ ...,,.__ ,,.. .. ........-:-.-::-.1-7: -'::-----..7..---_"-----77.-.:!=:::7:::r-7:' :77—.:":"-: - . , : •-:.-jr--.---;- • -:- ----.'-:.. - - -tr----.2"::--. --'.-----—- : . --. -1.2:.-..-.-.-.2.-1 . —_....-.:.L.2':',.. •'_'.._.:.:_*.__. _ ,__:..7,, .'•_:. .:...:*;.-4P:-=t-r-.7,1-' GRAIN HARVESTER -; 1 .. ■ -, - • • • • . • - -'.:.',:-thl•'.44k4ri'z.: • • . - • P.,•zry:,- -:•1•:_4,--. ... . . •• . • : • . . . . - --r • v.. - -• . . TERINR_TOBACCO ' " ' . 0 • . - ..• • — - --*------- • , 1 • :-i• t .4.•: -. t; trAif • • . ... . . • • . . - •• •.,•,..,. . ---— ' ^:..,„.a r. • - 41 a""."':• " ..:1 RESALE VALUE OF ALL OTHER FARM EQUIPMENT(NOT INCLUDED IN SECTION"P"ABOVE)AND LIVESTOCK• -• . ,- .--. , " •• ' e TRACTOR PLOWS&HARROWS, 0 . MILK TANKS . S BEEF CATTLE mm TAX OFFICE CULTIVATORS ...'.,,...;.„. .,.. • . OTHERDAIRY EQUIPMENT . STEERS/BULLS.. IIIN - --i'•.•* ...... . . . . _ • . • ._. : . LCORN PLANTERS • •. ENSILAGE CUTTERS COWS. MIMI .... . ._. .. . _ _. .._._..... TRACTOR WAGONS&TRAILERS • ENSILAGE BLOWERS HEIFERS 1111 TOBACCO STRINGERS• ,: -DUMP WAGONS ' UNDER 1 YR p.• •- • . . . . TOBACCO CURERS '• • • - - •HAY BALERS -: ' . DAIRY CATTLE • : . . IRRIGATION EOUIPMENT • HAYBINES ._,MOWERS&RAKES FEED MILLS . . BUSH HOGS.BLADES'&LOADERS UNDER 1 YR MANURE SPREADERS • • -- , . HOG EQUIPMENT ...'•- i: , '' ... I:: . .... 11C-O2WT4E;FIS..."'''.."--. POULTRY EOU1PMENT - ' • SWINE -. paw SPAYING-1MS,-. • • NUMBER TAX OFFICE USE HOGS.............1. ... . _ . . .,•C GRAIN DRILUUME SPREADERS POULTRY - ,, FEEDER PIGSerarous. ___._._. _ . .... . .. . . . • TRANSPLANTERS • • • • _ .. .' • HORSES — rillam • .-- PIGS tusaT - : riirs. - : OTHER NMI= • :' . • •ANIMA'S • .. wili ..-. •'!'.:-4..•.=;:::::i''• .a,::?...1."2A twe.CU . .• .• : • . •.•., - -• -• - • . _ ... ._ PROPERTY TAX RELIEF FOR ELDERLY ANTI PERMANENTLY DISABLED PERSONS. • • - -North Carolina under G.S.105.309(F)excludes from property taxes the first eight thousand five • '-- APPLICATION FOR PROPERTY TAX BELIEF FUR THE ELDB11.11 ---7—tang led 65 odiolder l (ogrigt°441-andasSesSed:naerilutlyaidUralbalieldThPoesraYdliswpitiedall7e iinacrctiVeadirlieslinngsidents_T ---.--:-!M)PERMANENTLY S4NSGS"1115-2711 nine thousand dollars(59.1)00).TV:xclushin covers real property(sor a mobile home)occupied by .: --(1)Is thep'MpertY listed on Otis ifigiMit Y-OurPriicrianeniresideridi '''''1-, , . , -• the owner as his or her Pennanent residence and/or household personal IrruPerlY used by the --•or household personal property used in connection with your (.--;-)* (' owner in connection with Or her permanent residence.Disposable income incluaes.all moneys .., . 2._pemianent residence? .. ... ... - -...-. •1 ..._ .. •--VES 4---received other than gifts dr inhentances re.ceived from a spouse,:lineal ancestors,or lirmal- ..-..--•-• • • - •-:•----;:-.--:'•----:-- .-7-,- —- - descendants. , . , ... _. (2).What Is your date of birth? •••• - • . ,- ,_ •-',-• --, -- - -...__A_If you received this eXclusion in 1984 you do Palmed to apply again unless you hive changed •—- -*-• (3)Did your disposable incame for 1984 exceed$9,000? -..' .I. ,'1 .1"- your permanent residenee. . yEs .1 ---13:11 you received the exclusion in 1984 and your disposable income in 1984 was above nine . "''r • '; . sand dollars($9,000),you must notify the tax supervisor.__ •. - ••- -(4)Enter your disposable Mcorrie HUSBAND . . •.._ ._ _ - C. if you received the exclusion in 1984 because you were totally and permanently disabled and :-.:"iiIFF ' - TOTAL______ • • • -••• you are no longer totally and permanently&tabled,you must notify the tax supervisor. • - D. If the person receiving the exemption in 1984 has riled,the person required by law to list the ff this applicalion is based upon total and permanent disability.ittach a catificat; ____...properly must notify the tax supervisor. _ . _ .. , . _ . . ..,certifies that you are totally and permanently disabled from a physician licensed," -medical doctor in North Carolina or a governmental agency authorized to Praire 7 - .._ Failure to make any of the notices required by the above sections before April 15 will . . deteir,,inarion. •- : . _ • . result in penaities and Interest 0 - .,...-.. - • • 1:-....t... If you did not receive the exclusion in 1984 but ate now eligible,you may apply for Itreedusion SIGNATURE .. on the application td.the right.It must be filed by April 15. . ' 1 F.Any person who fails to give the notice required by G.S.105.309(9 shall not only be&flied to .TELEPHONE . • • • - • •- loss of the exemption,but also to the penalties provided by G.S.105-312,and also if willful to • . _ •--._.- ---the penalty provided in G.S.105-310.For the purpose of determining Whether a penalty is ORANGE COUNTY TAX SUPERvisows OFFIC .•'-- .. . levied,whenever a taxpayer has received an exemption under G.S.105277.1 for one taxable - 208 SOUTH CAMERON STREET • :. - -' -' year but the property of taxpayer is not eligible for the exemption the next year.nohce given of IfILLSODROUG11,RORER CAROLINA 2727B. .. - •-• ". ' .. that fact to the tax supervisor an or before Apr1115 shall be considered as timely filed. - 111U.SBOROUGN MEBANE DURHAM ..- VOWEL Bitt • 732-8181 227-2031 668.7331 967-9251 • .- :......‘,.. . . - . 732-9361 227-2032,. ..- 9634501 ii 1 • • ORANGE COUNTY 14E. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA • ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT . - ITEM No.tr-$. MEETING DATE July 1, 1985 • SUBJECT: Approval of RSVP ACTION Grant Award 1DEPARTMENT: Department on Aging PUBLIC HEARING: YESxxx NO Jerry M. Passmore ATTACHMENT(S): Four copies of Notice, INFORMATION .CONTACT: 968-4478 of Grant Award. PHONE NUMBERS: . HILLSBOROUGH - 732-8181 • HILLSBOROUGH - 732-9361 CHAPEL HILL - 967-9251 MEBANE - 227-2031 DURHAM - 688-7331 • PURPOSE: To request approval of the RSVP Grant Award from ACTION for the period July 1, 1985 through June 30, 1986 in the amount of $24, 775 in Federal funds. • NEED: This is a yearly Continuation Application covering volunteer, services provided by 425 retirees serving approximately 58,000 hours for •45 non-profit organizations in Orange County. • IMPACT: The federal funds are needed to help finance the RSVP 1985-86 expenses. • • • • • • RECOMMENDATION(S): The Department on Aging staff recommends approval. If approved, the Chairman should sign four copies of the Grant Award and return them to the Department on Aging. PceMcr - PET:ON • ti `cy 'Cy� .".71 14 E Region IV REVD JUN U Q ''E Ea s 101 Marietta Street.N.W. 1985 Atlanta,Georgia 30323 Mr. Kenneth R. Thompson, County Manager Orange County County Government 106 E. Margaret Lane - Hillsborough, NC 27278 Re: Grant No. 440-4768/04 Dear Mr. Thompson: Enclosed are four copies of a Notice of Grant Award (NGA) and other related documents to continue the above referenced grant. Please have the Notice of Grant Award Form signed by an authorized representative of g y p your organization and return one fully signed copy to the attention of the Grants Officer. Upon receipt of the signed NGA and Standard Form 270, Request for Cash, the funds for the project will be forwarded to you. Of the remaining three copies, please retain one copy for your file and distribute one copy each to the Project Director, and the Chief Fiscal Officer. In order that advance payment requests may be approved, it is necesdary for you to keep your Financial Status Reports current. Be certain to file them correctly, on time, and on the correct form to the ACTION Grants & Contracts Office. The enclosed copy of the Financial Status Report (FSR), ACTION Form A-451 (Rev. 2/81) is the current approved form. ACTION Handbook 2650.2, enclosed is referenced on Page 3, Part II "Conditions", Line 2 of the NGA. Please assure that you are conducting the business management of the grant as set out in the handbook. We look forward to your cooperation as we work together to help the community meet its needs. Sincerely, - Nell H. Phelps Grants & Contracts Officer Region IV • Enclosures FEACE Ci,RPS • /SST:. • I.;NIVERSiTV YEAR FOR ACT;Or4 • NATIONAL ;':,CENT V;�t,r4TEER PROGRF•% FOSTER SRRAr:DFARE,TS • RET:R EC SENIOR VOLUNTEERS • SENIOR COMFANI•r: F°03RL V • S?EC,,� '1 Aut.:TEEE- PR"GF .'s [ 1..... ' 7 . , :. . i--- - • • r-- I - -- -/---r--r.- - -1-4 . :.,- -: - : " I ! E''' !...1 i i Constant .—.N : ' *' :- ! . % ... Data Code Z •*7 • .. 4 !?.• ...1# I 1 ' ci . NOTICE OF GRANT AWARD I!' I =511 VII N. rji --L".--- S 12 ' A' 53 il 1 ,11541 3 L . i. Put' C°"' 9 1 !,..: . . illi]i ii 1 5 1 6 ,i 1 a 19 1101 iirlit II 171a 19120121 22 23 24 13 _4 ...._. . 1_.1....3 - GL .G _.i. i L ilill°i2 .'aftdr,JUthOr.ty Of Pi._93-1 1.3.,Title. II, Part A -and subject to pertinent Legislation.Regulations and Policies • National Older American Volunteer Programs__ . (Program Title from Catalog al Federal home:tic AssislaWce1 — • . - - ---- - — • ''- 1.im'orecr Tiii.0 —- - ' '------— 2.cE&A No. 0 Retired Senior Volunteer Program 72. 02 ii -n- ir 4.GRANT NO:Ala-Mit PERIOD'--- 5.AMEND.NO. z . Orange County - 440-4768/04 _._. __________.— County Government 6.BUDGET From M 14 0 0 V V Thru M M 0 0 Y Y • PERIOD 106 E. Margaret Lane 07- 0185 06 30 86_ ________________ Hillsborough, PERIOD . M M 0 CI Y 7.PROJECT • illsborough, NC 27278 BEGINS ,-,.• 07 01 82 _______ ".. tE0i*Viifl6SIOhAt.DISTRICT IFSTATE 10.CITY II.COUNTY 11'rift-of—TT Ne •— — — GRANT 4 37 2190 135 I 2•Renewal — - - 3-Continuation 13.i.i•ML OF PROJEETDiitECTOR -. 2 I B 4.Revision . Kaye Huey 5-Augmentation -:-4-volaniftR-fTvFrisiiif161— . 15.STATE APPLICATION IDENTIFIER -- ft 8 no.of Volunteers Budgeted 425 5-C-0000-0673 ; 16.EMPOWER I.D.NO. 117.VENDOR CODE 58,000 56-6000327 1 304438-5 Estim.ned Volunteer Manhours 1E1 GRANTEE I GRANTEE DESCRIPTOR 19:AP1410PrilTATION NO. 2t).ACCOUNTING CLASS.CODE TYPE ' J . .4450103 85-74-4101-172 . Lip 01 • 21 ICI AL FEDERAL AMOUNT AWARDED PROJECT PERIOD S 99,950.00 ------ _-:-.-- 23. FAADS•FEDERAL ASSISTANCE AWARD DATA SYSTEM ri.grarmalommalloomayle PAH. .'' AWARD COMPUTATION !Ile). A.Federal 24,775_______ :- ..r. ') 33,637 A.Aniutint Frewm.sly Awarded ,1,;. ..? C.State 1 - _ ----- - - ----------- Current Budget Period I S 0 D.Local ..._t.,„,,•:. -- — __ , _ 1 ; — E Other B. Amount of This Award - -- -— LI 24.775.00 1. ..,,,‘ ;..z; -:F.-iii-AT.— 1$ 58 412 _ _.%,.. ...... ___________CURRENT APPROVED BUDGET 1 ' C. Carry.over front Preceding I /;,,, -...,,,- — I ' B.4114et Period I S 0 'y'f.:-.4. % 1 Vuluntrer Suppett Expenles _•Vshintter Csprnse-t---T;direct Com D.Carrent Approved Bod,jet: • t I I • 1.Fed•fral Share IA.B.C.12.1.1 S 24 775.00 42 s 22 445 .S 2 330 •5 0 I _ . ..._....__ -r i 2.Non.Federul Share s 33,637.00 .58 is _2E3,678 s_ 4,959 !s 0 .. -------i E. Tom.App.oved Current Budget 1 IC1.1 aqii 2-.E1 1 S 58 412.00 100 is 51 123 s 7 289 Is 0 ..........g...........;........... 24.REMARKS 1 - • ACCEPTANCE 25. ,epte......,W4R(4 NINIDON' Y Date BY. .-- - . Date A.S ..2 9_ AS 5,9,ml:we of Authorized Official _ Grants Officer Nell Phelps .. ____ ....._._ ••--- (rid TION _ Region IV — _ (Grantee OrganiratiorT) . 1,CTiON FORM A16.1(Rev.8,181) Page 1•-f 3 GRANTEE ORGANIZATION • Oral County '' - z -• wF PART 1--BUDGET PLAN 1. LUMP ITEER SUPPORT EXPENSES A. GRANTEE PERSONNEL III (2) (31 (41 ( (5) .EXPENSES Annual %Time Tow Fadarai Spent on FuncN Non•Fada►aI Tills Salary Proioft Cost Rnrynled Resources Director $22,092 100 s s 22,092 s 13,000 $ 9,092. Asst/Bkkpr/Secy 14, 484 100 • 14, 484 8, 645 5, 839 Work Study Student 1,013 40 405 -0- 405 • TOTAL PERSONNEL EXPENSES $i7, 589 98 - % $ 36,9$1 ,s 21, 645 E !b, 3.3b B. FRINGE BENEFITS _ 6,99.4 b,99 C. (11 GRANTEE STAFF LOCAL TRAVEL 615 NOININUMNI C. 12)GRANTEE STAFF LONG DISTANCE TRAVEL 1,018 800 • D. EQUIPMENT --t E. SUPPLIES _ 360 360 F. CONTRACTUAL SERVICE 120 120 G. OTHER: 81 81 Cornmunicstions 1, 816 1,8 6 Printing 630 630 Spec* 2, 508 f 4• H. INDIRECT COSTS 1 TOTAL VOLUNTEER SUPPORT EXPENSES 51,123 22, 445 28, 678 rr L. VOLUNTEER EXPENSES A. PERSONNEL EXPENSES Stipends Living Allowance End of Service Allowance Food end Lodging Allowance B. FRINGE BENEFITS Meets 80 . 80 FICA Uniforms Insurance t3/.4 45u , I Other: C. TRAVEL 1, 162 : : 1 t 482 D. EQUIPMENT E. SUPPLIES • • F. CONTRACTUAL SERVICE 1 G. OTHER Recognition 2,975 TOTAL VOLUNTEER EXPENSES 7, 289 2, 330 ' _ 4,959 TOTAL COSTS $ 58, 412 = 24, 775 $ 34, 637 • S. PERCENTAGE 100% 42.4 % 57.6 % 4. VOLUNTEER STRENGTH: ' frtkr Esttmated Volunteer menhours: let qlr 14,000 2nd qtr 14 500 3rd qtr 15 000 4th gtrl4,500 LoST�i•(/i� -,� .43 Budgeted number volunteers o eivlu ya : tIL 425 g.t11 M 425 3 4(„ft 5 � 42 11(cr 425 MlereQ!8 58.29, ACTION FORM A•I6.Z IBM) Pogo 2 of _? rz PART U--CONDITIONS 14E • NEW AND CONTINUATION ACTION PROJECT GRANT AWARDS GRANT NO. 440-476804 AMEND,NO This grant award,consisting of PART I—BUDGET PLAN and PART II—CONDITIONS,will be administered in accordance with the plicevIngdo ummta which are hereby incorporated by reference: 1. Grant Application dated _ 02-2 I.-85 to negotiated. 2. Grants Management Handbook for Grantees;ACTION Handbook 2650.2. + r•i'K I rrt I I - + 3, - tandar�ls of Cc�ncl+r (I crt' incnt Part At tar lied) a, , RSVP Handbook 4405.92 Conditions Checked are Applicable to this Grant: ❑ 6. Stipends cannot be reduced without prior written approval of ACTION. 1. The budget shown on Page 2 of this award provides a • detailed budget breakdown of the grant award. Al! el 7. Specific written approval for lease or purchase of expenditures shall be based upon this approved budget, vehicles is required by ACTION. f 12. Request for funds will be submitted on Standard Form 0 8. The grantee's authorization to purchase a 270, "Request for Advance or Reimbursement"in an vehicle is limited to a(n) (insert type)' original and two (2) signed copies.(See Chapter 9 of vehicle. The purchase ACTION Handbook 2650.2.) price shall not exceed $ • in 3. The executed copy of the "Notice of Grant Award" Ea 9. Unexpended funds from prior budget period should must be signed and returned by the grantee to the • be applied to reduce the amount of the first advance. Grants Officer before any funds can be provided. The amount of the unexpended balance and the Immediate return of the executed Notice of Grant computation of how it will be applied should be • Award copy and Request for Advance or Reimburse- explained on the "Request"-for Advance or Reim- ment will expedite the receipt of funds.. bursement",Standard Form 270. ® 4. Grantee will report quarterly disbursements on IN 10. The ACTION Project Manager for this ACTION Form A-451 "Financial Status Report"in an grant is p Robert Winston original and two (2) signed copies within 30 days of (name) the end of each fiscal quarter(June 30,September 30, Raleigh, NC December 31,March 31)and the final within 90 days (office) .telephone number of the close of the grant budget period.(See Chapter (91.9) 795-471 J 10 of ACTION Handbook 2650.2.) •The Project Manager has full authority to represent ACTION in connection ❑ S. Grantees will submit an original and two (2) signed with management of the technical and programmatic ( ) gn performance of the grant. He/She is not.authorized copies of Standard Form 272, Federal Cash Trans. to change the terms and conditi actions Report,no later than 15 working days follow- ono estimated atpd ovals. or pen ing the end of each quarter.(See Chapter 10 ACTION period of performance, or to give approvals, Handbook 2650.2.) written or verbal, specifically reserved for the Grants • Officer. C7 11. The Grantee shall be entitled to 0 12. All property and equipment purchased reimbursement for costs incurred under Grant # on.or after is to be transferred to this grant. which if incurred after this grant has been entered into, would have been reimbursable under the terms of this grant. ACTION Form/t-1F(Rev 5/81) Pape 3 of ? at e.IS 151 . (.. ';' • 45 CFR, PART 1201 STANDARDS OF CONDUCT 1 - v 1201.735-102 DEFINITIONS (f) "Associated with" means: or contract. In addition, any such grant (1) That the person is a director of the or contract shall only be awarded through organization or is a member of a board or a competitive process. In the event a committee which exercises a recommending regular or special employee who partici- - or supervisory function in connection with pated in the development of the grant or an ACTION project, - contract proposal prior to being employed , at ACTION does participate as an ACTION 4 (2) That the person or his or her spouse, minor child or other member of his or her employee in the decision process for such immediate household serves as an employee, grant,or contract, the organization shall officer, owner, trustee, partner, consult- be suspended from consideration. ant, or paid adviser (general membership (d) If a special employee participated in an organization is not included within as an employee of ACTION in any aspect the definition of "associated with"). of the development of a proposal or project, = , -; whether or not such participation is minimal § 1201.734-303 Association with ACTION or substantial, any organization with which grantee or contractor or potential gran- he or she is associated shall be suspended • tee or contractor while an ACTION employee, from consideration for the grant or contract. (e) If an organization with which a special (a) No regular employee may be associated employee is associated submits a proposal for with any ACTION grantee, contractor, or a grant or contract, and the special employee potential grantee or contractor. Any or- did not participate either as an employee of ganization that is associated with a,re- ACTION or an associate of the organization gular employee shall be suspended from in any aspect of the project or proposal or consideration as a grantee or contractor. the application therefore,-the matter shall (b) No regular or special employee, ex- be referred to the Committee on Conflict of - cept in his or her official capacity as Interests for determination. The Committee an ACTION employee, shall either partici- shall consider the following factors and any pate in any way on behalf of any organize- other it deems relevant: tion in the preparation or development of (1) The nature, length, and origin or the a grant or contract proposal involving special employee's relationship with the ACTION or represent any other organization Agency, the nature and scope of the employees,s • in a matter pending before ACTION. In duties and responsibilities, the division or the event that a regular or special em- office to which the employee is assigned, ployee participates while an employee and whether the employee's duties are in any - of ACTION in any aspect of the develop- way related to the proposed grant or contract. went of a grant or contract proposal (2) The nature, length, and type of the em- on behalf of an organization, or repre- ployee's relationship with the organization, ' whether the employee's position involves cents another organization in a matter pending before ACTION, that organization policy making or supervision of other employees shall be suspended from consideration for and the relationship of the position with the the grant or contract. organization to the work to be performed under (c) No regular or special employee who, the proposed grant or contract. prior to his or her employment at ACTION, (3) Whether awarding the grant or contract participated in the development of a grant to the organization would result in the appear- or contract proposal on behalf of another ance of or the potential for a conflict of organization, shall.participate as an interest. ACTION employee, in any aspect of the de- (4) The process to be used in awarding the • cision process regarding that grant or grant or contract. contract, or, if the grant or contract (f) If a special employee wishes to become • is awarded, in any oversight or manage- or remain associated with an ACTION grantee went capacity in relation to that grant or contractor while he or she is an employee - I basittmamr 1 Page 2 of 3 ,,,-- 411Z ±,....R 15.1 ,,.. „. . ok of ACTION, subject to the restrictions (b) tract for that position. In addition, a -1.- through (e) of § 1201.735-303, the matter letter describing the violation will be -4 shall be referred to the Committee on Con- placed inIthe employee's personnel file. .. 1 filet of Interests for determination. The • Committee shall consider the following fac- § 1201.735-305 Employment with ACTION tors and any others it deems relevant: grantee or contractor i (1) The nature, length, and origin of the .,.., special employee's relationship with the An employee of an ACTION grantee or con- - Agency, the nature and scope of the employ- tractor who is compensated directly or in- ee's duties and responsibilities, the divi- directly from ACTION funds will be ineli- sion or office to which the employee is gible to be compensated under any personal assigned, and whether the employee's duties or nonpersonal services contact with this :..,_ are in any way related to the grant or con- Agency which will result in the employee '1 tract. being paid twice for the same time or (2) The nature, length, and type of the em- product. ployee's relationship with the organization, whether the employee's position involves § 1201.735.307 Gifts, entertainment, ' policymaking or supervision of other em- and favors. ployees and the relationship of the position with the organization to the work to be per- (a) From donors dealing with ACTION. (1) formed under the proposed grant or contract. No regular or special employees may solicit 1 --, (3) Whether such a relationship would re- or accept, directly or indirectly, for them- suit in the appearance of or the potential selves, for any member of their family, or for a conflict of interest. for any person with whom they have business (g) Any suspension involving proposed con- or financial ties, any gift, gratuity, favor, . tracts under this rule shall be in accor- entertainment, or loan or any other thing of dance with procedure set for in 31 CFR 1-- '-' value, from any individual or organization , 1.600 at seq. which: ' . (i) Has, or is seeking to obtain, contractual , § 1201,735-304 Employment after leaving or other business or financial relations with ACTION. ACTION: • (ii) Has interests that may be substantially (a) Employees may negotiate for prospec- affected by the performance or nonperformance tive employment with non-Government organ- of the employee's official responsibility; izations only when they have no duties as (iii) Is in any way attempting to affect ACTION employees which could affect that the employee's exercise of his or her offi- organization's interest, or after they cial responsibility; or have disqualified themselves, or the (iv) Conducts operations or activities written permission of their supervisor, that are regulated by ACTION. from such duties. (2) Subparagraph (1) of this paragraph does (b) For 1 year after leaving ACTION, no not prohibit, even if the donor has dealings regular or special employee may serve our- with ACTION: suant to a personal services contract or (i) Acceptance of things of value from pa- accept employment with an ACTION grantee rents, children, or spouse if those relation- or contractor for a position in which he ships rather than the business of the donor or she would be working in any activity is the motivating factor for the gift; supported in whole or in part by ACTION (ii) Acceptance of food and refreshments of funds received under an ACTION program nominal value on infrequent occasions in the • which was within the boundaries of the ordinary course of breakfast, luncheon, or employee's official responsibility or in dinner meeting or other meetings; which he or she participated personally (iii) Solicitation and acceptance of loans while employed at ACTION. from banks or other financial institutions (c) If, within 1 year after leaving ACTION, to finance proper and usual activities of an individual accepts employment in viola- employees, such as home mortgage loans, soli- tion of this rule, ACTION will disallow cited and accepted on customary terms; the costs allocated under the grant or con- (iv) Acceptance on behif of minor dependents _ . 154. ' of fellowships, scholarships, or educational modations, goods, or services in kind from loans awarded on the basis of merit and/or a non-GoNernment source, this item or items need; will be treated as a donation to ACTION and I CO Acceptance of awards for meritorious an appropriate reduction will be made in public contribution or achievement given per diem or other travel expenses payable. by a charitable, religious, professional, osocial, fraternal, nonprofit educational § 1201.735-402 Review of statements. and recreational, public service, or civic organization. (c) Whenever an organization submits a pro- (3) Regular ()especial employees need not posal or application or otherwise indicates return unsolicited advertising or promo- in writing its intent to apply for or seek tional material, such as pens, pencils, a specific grant or contract, ACTION shall note pads, calendars, and other things 0 immediately forward a copy of the Agency of nominal intrinsic value.' standards of conduct to that organization (b) From other ACTION employees. No em- and shall note which particular rules ployees in superior official positions may apply to potential grantees and contractors. accept any gifts presented as contributions from employees receiving less salary than themselves. No employees shall solicit contributions from other employees for a gift to an employee in a superior official posi- tion, nor shall any employees make a dona- tion as a gift to an employee in a superior official position. However, this paragraph does not prohibit a voluntary gift of nominal value or donation in a nominal amount made on a special occasion such as marriage, illness or retirement. (c) From foreign governments. No regular employee may solicit or, without the con- sent of the Congress, receive any present, decoration, emolument pecuniary favor, office, title, or any other gift from any foreign government. See 5 U.S.C. 7342; Executive Order 11320; and 22 CFR, Part 3 (as added, 32 FR 6469). (d) Gifts to ACTION. Gifts to the United States or to ACTION may be accepted in accor- dance with ACTION regulations. (e) Reimbursement for expenses. Neither this section nor § 1201.735-310(a) precludes an employee from receipt of bona fide reimburse- ment, unless prohibited by law, for expenses of travel and such other necessary subsistence as is compatible with this part and for which no Government payment or reimbursement is made. However, this paragraph does not allow an em- ployee to be reimbursed, or payment to be made on his behalf, for excessive personal living expenses, gifts, entertainment, or other per- sonal benefits. Nor does it allow an employee to receive non-Government reimbursement of travel expenses for travel on official business under ACTION orders; but rather, such reimburse- ment, if any, should be made to ACTION and amounts received should be credited to its • appropriation. If an employee receives accom- g7 C 1 5 ORANGE OUNTY Bum OF COMMISSIONERS Action Acjenda ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Item tb.. FEE.F.MG DATE July 1, 1985 Subject: Governor Martin's Recognition Ceremony for Volunteers ryvan-qamimPs---------7 Pubu---.7---Tr—Hearh - no AtAziolummTt(s) : Information Contact: Commissioner Marshall Yes - letter from the Offioe or Beverly A. Blythe, Clerk of the Governor. Phone Number: 732-8181, 968-4501, 227-0231 f PURPOSE: Recognition Ceremony to be held during the first part of November to honor one outstanding volunteer, and one outstanding volunteer organization in each county. ;CI 10MII: Procedure for receiving nominations. IMPACT: Recognition of voluntarism in Orange County. RECOPIOMBAITON: As the Board decides. . 154 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR RALEIGH 27611 JAMES G. MARTIN June 21, 1985 GOVERNOR Ms. Beverly A. Blythe 106 East Margaret Lane Hillsborough, NC 27278 Dear Beverly: I take pleasure in announcing that Governor, and Mrs. Martin are planning a recognition ceremony to be held during the first part of November at the Executive Mansion. Since they believe North Carolina's vital strength lies within the spirit of voluntarism, they in each county. plan this occasion to honor the winners e• Also, I am pleased to announce that Mr. Don Evans, Deputy of Citizen Participation, and Mrs. Lisa McLemore, Recognition Coordinator, have joined our staff. They will be coordinating the Governor's volunteer program. When you have any questions regarding the recognition ceremony, or information on the new volunteer program, please call 1-800-662-7952. Mr. Evans and Mrs. McLemore will be glad to assist you. We are asking that each County Involvement Council nominate one outstanding volunteer, and one outstanding volunteer organization in their county, which represent superior qualities of voluntarism. Enclosed is a form for your use in making the two nominations. We would appreciate having this form returned no later than July 22. Following this, you and your nominees will receive more information about the final details of the ceremony. We are hoping that all 100 counties,will be represented. Working together, we can make this special event a wonderful memory for those who will be honored. We welcome your comments and will be glad to know of your interest and concerns. Sincerely, Arlene C. Pulley Executive Director Governor's Office of Citizen Affairs ACP:mdd Enclosure Please send form in by July 22nd to: Executive i `J C Director of• Citizen Affair$ • Office of the Governor 't Raleigh, North Carolina 2761i 1985 VOLUNTEER--x AWARD.NOMINEES OUTSTANDING INDIVIDUAL VOLUNTEER • Name: Address.: Phone #- ( ) Accomplishments: • • Local'•Newspaper Address: OUTSTANDING VOLUNTEER ORGANIZATION Name: " Address: Phone #-- ( ) Accomplishments: Local Newspaper: Address: 15E ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agenda ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Item m. Fig Meeting Date: JULY 1, 1985 SUBJECT: JULY 4, 1985 FIREWORKS DISPLAY DEPARTMENT: COUNTY MANAGER PUBLIC HEARING: Yes jUb ATTACHMENT(S) INFORMATION CONTACT: MANAGER'S OFFICE X501 TELEPHONE NUMBER: YES Hillsborough - 732-8181 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 Mebane - 227-2031 Durham - 688-7331 PURPOSE: To request approval from the Board of Commissioners for a fire- works display to be held at the Collins Little League Field on July 4, 1985. NEED: Manager's signature on approval letter. In discussing plans for the display with Jack Davis, owner of MOPACO of Hillsborough, it appears that adequate precautions will be taken to guard against accidents. Both the fire fighting unit and the rescue unit will be present during the entire program. IMPACT: RECCVIMENDATION(S): The Board's approval for Manager's signature on letter of approval. WY' • .. . 15 *'Ii.,'..; .. . 07R. (C--etil "-Z -e) r1PCCiti OR/9/1-Gc du ,,-r/ ri2g/v471-61-/Et(- , . . /6 4 oergs--7- r/7/OA c.v.,. 7.- 4,9-A4E . . -...,..., . • . -.•,.., . . . !„... 0/0A/67,6" Cou,,,tpry iCtirelEet/C.VeltS 132/ /.;k' . .. •'4', 06../91t. kg712, '.° . •.;'•• . • • 7V' /..s" ,O "pie-0448-5-7- xaie Ae,o,v to c_ eiet/4 cw. C.4 1%4 ii,-7y C ov42017/..7,r i c - -417 4 ,,e-fietetjete / i C czLec,vx. . 4/.7„7-4.,e g - Oa*" /e//64:-..o s•-• o/u 7701.6- .-' ci,e,v,- /A4;1 es.; (.7-r-144, "KI-L''' . ;'..4 j/ Glee/ „,e,,e.,,,-,1..)• Aiit... . m ie. 0 metidle P'64€ ts CcP4-K4 Vizio.a .K ?"?;:e 647Ag-itve -,, (1 iAl 7Y (iRik. 06a/gir7ZE,t7 4,24-/0 7-471.e d•eily-NaE cou.kv-f-'fr' /eks-cc•-z. UNi-r. /---)d. 4./c/i-vo ax 7-e-f4. 410/64 . .f.ge /4 4 7 0 v/0.6-0 .e'y if&sfr-icws!dee:.iE” P4,974 e.s-- 44/23 1/64.CIA/TX./rieS , , . . . : . Xic A94-lird chgt Mg-noe id cc/in/ /67v6 C*,5 /appir,,-G.,-49- L Co/c.7/./ s.c., . . t/ - tack ,e-., 1,2,a t/r_s- L .9"-z--L•'--- 1 . 173a_-a331 • . . ....._.... ... ... ._ .. ._ . . . . .. . .. _ . . .... ........_...._ . Oil ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date July 1, 1985 Action Agenda Item #fra, SUBJECT: ANNIE MAE F. EDWARDS AND JOSEPH EDWARDS - PRELIMINARY DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes .JL. No Attachment(s) Information Contact: EDDIE KIRK CHECKLIST VICINITY MAP PRELIMINARY PLAN DRAFT 6/17/85 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031. Chapel Hill - 968-4501 PURPOSE: To consider approval of the Preliminary Plan for Annie Mae F. Edwards and Joseph Edwards. To receive the Planning Board recommendation of June 17, 1985. NEED: The property in question is located in Chapel Hill Township off Neville Road (SR 1945) . It is known as Lot 8B of Tax Map 115. There is 1 additional lot proposed out of approximately 5.8 acres. The property is zoned R-1 And subject to the PWII overlay zoning district standards and is designated Rural Buffer and University Lake Water Supply Watershed in the Land Use Plan. " It is located in the White Cross Fire District. The applicant is requesting a Class C private road to serve the two lots. IMPACT: The addition of one lot would have a minimal impact on this area. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Board recommends approval. .............._ . . .........._._.__._... MAJOR SUBDIVISION CHECKLIST NAME OF SUBDIVISION A!bi i F m AF F rnwAgnq F .JOSPEH FEJ1JARnc OWNER OR DEVELOPER NORA FEARI bIrlow ADDRESS Route 4 , Box 59, Chapel Hill , NC 27514 TOWNSHIP_ Chanel Hill TAX MAP 11 c, BLOCK LOT 8H C • t S 3�1 NAME OF SURVEYOR OR ENGINEER Freehold Land Surveys, Inc. Total number of lots 1 additional To be developed in 1 phase(s) . Total number of acres cL R Typical dwelling units at present None or proposed 1 WATER SUPPLY; Public (Name) Commnnity Individual X SEWAGE TREATMENT: Public Community Individual Septic tank X SCHOOL DISTRICT Chapel Hill ' FIRE DISTRICT_ White Cross Access onto State Road k 1945 Road Standard: Public or Private Class A X r B C X Existing critical areas such as streams ( X), Flood prone areas ( ), Watershed ( }, Historic Sites ( }, Other { ) .Explain: phP , Land uses in the genera area g Weeded end—rep-idetrt 1-e l-- SKETCH PLAN RECEIVED (Date) 2-15-85 Approved { } Recommended Changes { } PRELIMINARY PLAN RECEIVED (Date) 6-3-85 REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAN RECEIVED (Date) Preliminary Review by Health Department 6-3-85 Erosion Control Officer 6-7-85 Board of Education 6-6-85 Department of Transportation OWASA (if possible) Other -Mebane (if possible) Hillsborough (if possible) Orange/Alamance (if possible) Preliminary Action by the Planning Board Recommended approval 6-17-85 Preliminary Action by the County Commissioners FINAL PLAT RECEIVED (Date) ( ) All lots were approved by the Health Department { ) Lots failing Health Departments approval are combined or listed properly on the plat ( ) Road Maintenance Agreement submitted (where applicable) . Approved ( ) Improvements have been provided for; completed; bond, letter of credit, cash. Date ( ) Final OWASA approval (where applicable) on•all plans & specifications, Date ( ) Final DOT approval on plat ( ) Final action by the Planning Board 4 8769 0.1.cS 9758 — 0 1:7. \ ANNIE MAE F. EDWARDS & JOSEPH EDWARDS SC Applicant: Nora Fearrington '� } I. Zoning : R-1 BY) • I: LUP Designation: Rural Buffer & Water 85 Supply Watershed g-K 4,Na:X • • • ; • Scale: 111= 4001 t . 75 i;:: ' s. 1:� IAC • D fprf 02 Q E'h, It •• - .a ta : j.. 4 ��+�1i 4 0 ' ...- . - 8138 to .... / p/p 8 ' , 03045 19.56 AC• N 1.96AC. `$C Mrn r ;lY 4 Voi . Qr ``. I 7 • 11 . . IQ w 5465 p/0 8 2.454 AC. : •` AC. —`__. N �-o / 9306 N 7 . ' • / . A�a i 1,.� C. .I OIAC•j23 6 "' 1193 305 ens .� . •• O _ 9A 7::,: 2 ' 30 1.97• to ,6L AC • 105.08 AC C. , a) '�0L/ 2546 •f 7500 0+t' 29 . o al 5.6 AC • - I • . G.1 p4 40T 1 g a nn I 4 791 • 014 1yeiff40/ s- anwhg t52 2b fitc4F4- 5 7 d. James Hill Realty - Preliminary Plan The property in uestion is located in Cheeks Township along Mill Creek Road (SR 1343) . It is known as Lot 11, Tax Map 6. There are 6 lots proposed out of approximately 31.30 acres. The smallest lot proposed is 2.75 acres while the largest lot is 8.99 acres. The property is zoned A-R and is designated Agricultural-Residential in the Land Use Plan. It is located in the Efland Rural Fire District. The addition of 6 lots could add approximately 40 trips per day to Mill Creek Road. A 1981 traffic count on Mill Creek Road indicated 1050 trips per day at the intersection with West Lebanon Road. The addition of these lots would have a minimal impact on this area. Planning Staff recommends approval. MOTION: Pearson moved approval. Seconded by Walters. VOTE: Unanimous. Ihrz e. Annie Mae F. Edwards and Joseph Edwards - Preliminary Plan Presentation by Smith. The property in uestion is located in Chapel Hill Township off Neville Road (SR 1945) . It is known as Lot 8B of Tax Map 115. There is 1 additional lot proposed out of • approximately 5.8 acres. The property is zoned R-1 and subject to the PWII overlay zoning district standards and is designated Rural Buffer and University Laske Water Supply Watershed in the Land Use Plan. It is located in the White Cross Fire District. The applicant is requesting a Class C private road to serve the two lots. The addition of one lot would have a minimal impact on this area. The Planning Staff recommends approval. Presentation by Smith. 01E ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS . ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date July 1, 1935 Action Agenda Item #F73 SUBJECT: JAMES HILL REALTY - PRELIMINARY DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes _X_ No Attachment(s) Information Contact: EDDIE KIRK CHECKLIST VICINITY MAP PRELIMINARY PLAN DRAFT 6/17/85 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 PURPOSE: To consider approval of the Preliminary Plan for James Hill Realty. To receive the Planning Board recommendation of June 17, 1985. NEED: The property in question is located in Cheeks Township along Mill Creek Road (SR 1343) . It is known as Lot 11, Tax Map 6. There are 6 lots proposed out of approximately 31.30 acres. The smallest lot proposed is 2.75 acres while the largest lot is 8.99 acres. The property is zoned A-R and is designated Agricultural-Residential in the Land Use Plan. It is located in the Efland Rural Fire District. IMPACT: The addition of 6 lots could add approximately 40 trips per day to Mill Creek Road. A 1981 traffic count on Mill Creek Road indicated 1050 trips per day at the intersection with West Lebanon Road. The addition of these lots would have a minimal impact on this area. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Board recommends approval. MAJOR SUBDIVISION CHECKLIST James-Hill Realty James !. .Hill NAME OF SUBDIVISION OWNER OR DEVELOPER ADDRESS P_ 0_ Rox 311 urham, NC TOWNSHIP Cheeks TAX MAP 6 BLOCK LOT 11 C ' m NAME OF SURVEYOR OR ENGINEER William Jerry Autry Total number of lots 6 To be developed in 1 phases), Total number of. acres_ 31 ,3 Typical dwelling units at present Hong or proposed WATER SUPPLY: Public (Name) Commnuity Individual X SEWAGE TREATMENT: Public Community Individual Septic tank X SCHOOL DISTRICT nranaa • • FIRE DISTRICT Access onto State Road # Road Standard: Public�� or Private Class A_ , B , C Existing critical. areas sA�as streams ( X ), Flood prone areas (X ), Watershed ( )r Historic Sites { }, Other ( } Explain: Sena Inn +roar Kloori Arun as ahnutn on map Land uses in the general area Aq r 1 P l I to ra l and lies l dent la l SKETCH PLAN RECEIVED (Date) 6_�=�5 Approved ( X) Recommended Changes ( ) PRELIMINARY PLAN RECEIVED- (Date) 6-5-$5 REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAN RECEIVED (Date)' Preliminary Review by Health Department 6-445 Erosion Control Officer Board of Education . 6-7- it Department of Transportation OWASA (if possible) Other -Mebane (if possible) -Hillsborough (if possible) -Orange/Alamance (if possible)' Preliminary Action by the Planning Board_ Recommended Apprrval 6-17-85 Preliminary Action by the County Commissioners FINAL PLAT RECEIVED (Date) ( ) All lots were approved by the Health Department { ) Lots failing Health Departments approval are combined or listed properly on the plat { ) Road Maintenance Agreement submitted (where applicable). Approved ( ) Improvements have been provided for; completed; bond, letter of credit, cash. Date ( ) Final OWASA approval (where applicable) on,all plans & specifications, Date ( ) Final DOT approval on plat { ) Final action by the Planning Board - '2 I 98261— .•-- #9836 • 01 1 /. ' . o a JAMES HILL REALTY ti 1 Applicant: James Hill Realty N Zoning: A-R - .. .�-. . LUP Designation: Agricultural Residential Scale: ] 400 ' •. _ _ -�_- - . ........ •4475 gr. AC. 6CDC 0 13.288 AC 1101r 1 ef;' ----; R,‘ t 3 • 4 .1038 _ .3, 05 ~ .\ ' N8-•9 0-1 9.1 AC. r..„,./P ,/� 0` '\ ('i 2_48AC. 238‘• s ,,/,:i,`i�' 4778 ...4Ik 10 .. .. . • -4 NY R/w 0 .3251 V � I .SR4- 4.64 4G.// _.. 1~ 5914 ` f +_'.. 11.89AC• \ / .- 35.54 AC• fr \ , // I j��� 004 0731 V/ ,y .06 6654 •1.21 AC `17;19525 i•r 0 _ ,'7 431 4 C 838 , s .02A / `l 41 i1 �� i 1 "�'''"�- // 1 31 i 21 I 34 42 .._,1 MI :' 32 t 8073 • 21.1 AC. -/ri —1 E 1' 6956 AC. , 018 -AeAfr 07/g5 fiAmeivC Obebniwo/z 7 d. James Hill Realty - Preliminary Plan The property in uestion is located in Cheeks Township along Mill Creek Road (SR 1343) . It is known as Lot 11, Tax Map 6. There are 6 lots proposed out of approximately 31.30 acres. The smallest lot proposed is 2.75 acres while the largest lot is 8.99 acres. The property is zoned A-R and is designated Agricultural-Residential in the Land Use Plan. It is located in the Efland Rural Fire District. The addition of 6 lots could add approximately 40 trips per day to Mill Creek Road. A 1981 traffic count on Mill Creek Road indicated 1050 trips per day at the intersection with West Lebanon Road. The addition of these lots would have a minimal impact on this area. Planning Staff recommends approval. MOTION: Pearson moved approval. Seconded by Walters. VOTE: Unanimous. e. Annie Mae F. Edwards and Joseph Edwards - Preliminary Plan Presentation by Smith. The property in uestion is located in Chapel Hill Township off Neville Road (SR 1945) . It is known as Lot 8B of Tax Map 115. There is 1 additional lot proposed out of approximately 5.8 acres. The property is zoned R-1 and subject to the PWII overlay zoning district standards and is designated Rural Buffer and University Laske Water Supply Watershed in the Land Use Plan. It is located in the White Cross Fire District. The applicant is requesting a Class C private road to serve the two lots. The addition of one lot would have a minimal impact on this area. The Planning Staff recommends approval. Presentation by Smith. 015 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date July 1, 1985 Action Agenda Item t SUBJECT: PROPERTY OF KENNY MARTIN - PRELIMINARY DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes 2L. No Attachment(s) Information Contact: JANE ATWATER CHECKLIST VICINITY MAP PRELIMINARY PLAN DRAFT 6/17/85 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 PURPOSE: To consider approval of the Preliminary Plan for the property of Kenny Martin. To receive the Planning Board recommendation of June 17, 1985. NEED: The property in question is located on a private road (Elva Lane) off of NC Highway 54 in Bingham Township. The property is referenced as part of lot 4A of Tax Map 29. It is bordered by White Cross Mobile Home Park, residential and commercial development and undeveloped land. The tract is designated as Rural Buffer and Protected Water Supply Watershed on the Land Use Plan. There are three (3) lots proposed out of 4.15 acres. The lot sizes are 2.12 acres, 1.08 acres and .95 acre. The property is zoned Residential-I (R-1) with an overlay district designation Protected Watershed-II (PW-II) . This property is within the University Lake Watershed. Access to the site is provided via a Class "B" road which leads to NC Highway 54, a road designated as an arterial street in the Land Use Plan. The applicant is required to upgrade the existing private drive (Elva Lane) from a Class "B" to a Class "A" road. Also, a Class "C" road will be constructed to provide access to Lot 4C of this subdivision. The property is located in the White Cross Volunteer Fire District. Law enforcement is provided by the Orange County Sheriff's Department. It will be patrolled on a 24 hour basis. ea PROPERTY OF KENNY MARTIN - PRELIMINARY PAGE TWO JULY 1, 1985 IMPACT: Development of the subdivision would have minimal impact on the area. RECOMMENDATION: On June 17, 1985 the Planning Board recommended approval of the Plan subject to the following conditions: (1) label Elva Lane as a Class "A" road on the plat (2) all setbacks be indicated or provide a note on the plat which states the typical setback requirements (3) change the Class NCR road name from Martin Place to Daylight Drive (Martin Place would constitute a duplicate road name, therefore, the applicant requests that it be changed to Daylight Drive) (4) indicate the lot area for #4A outside of the right-of-way and label as such (5) indicate the distance (in feet) to NC Highway 54 from Elva Lane to the northern property line of Kenny Martin's property (6) upon construction of the Class "C" road a swale or french drain system be created. (This condition was imposed by the Planning Staff upon approving the application for a building poermit for the 2.12 acre tract. The swale or french drain system would allow drainage towards the wooded portion of the lot to satisfy the 1/2 inch infiltration standard as specified in Section 6.23.7 of the zoning Ordinance) . MAJOR SUBDIVISION CHECKLIST NAME OF SUBDIVISION Property of Kenny Martin OWNER OR DEVELOPER Kenny Martin ADDRESS Route 7, Box 279, Chapel Hill ,* HC 27514, 942-4268 TOWNSHIP Bingham TAX MAP 29 BLOCK - LOT P/0 4A NAME OF SURVEYOR OR ENGINEER Fred'.P. Johnston - Freehold) Land Surveys, Inc. Total number of lots 3 To be developed in 1 —Phase(s) . Total number of acres 11-15 Typical dwelling units at present tQQ- or proposed Single Family WATER SUPPLY: Public (Name) Community Individual yF SEWAGE TREATMENT: Public Community Individual septic tank � SCHOOL DISTRICT FIRE DISTRICT Sjhi is Crccc Access onto State Road # nir. C& Road Standard: Public or Private Class A .� , B . C X Existing critical areas •such as streams ( }, Flood prone areas ( ), Watershed () , historic Sites ( } , Other { ) Explain:_ iln i vPrc i tIl 1 akP Land uses in the general area Mobile hn P nark,, rPCidentin] And ,rnmmPreIal dPvP1nnrmP_n„t,_iindAupinpnp+rl 1nnr SKETCH PLAN RECEIVED (Date) 4_��_Rry Approved ( ) Recommended Changes (x } PRELIMINARY PLAN RECEIVED (Date) _3_gr REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAN RECEIVED (Date) Preliminary Review by.Health Department .6_11_8; perry gi,rnc Erosion Control Officer f,_7-R5 Board of Education A-rj-R5 Mary lynn TrimInve Department of Transportation OWASA' (if possible) Other -Mebane (if possible) -Hillsborough (if possible) -Orange/Alamance (if possible) Preliminary Action by the Planning Board ' Preliminary Action by the County Commissioners FINAL PLAT RECEIVED (Date) ( } All .lots were approved by the Health Department ( ) Lots failing Health Departments approval are combined or listed properly on the plat ( ) Road Maintenance Agreement submitted (where applicable). Approved { } Improvements have been provided for; completed; bond, letter of credit, cash. Date ( ) Final OWASA approval (where applicable) on•all plans & specifications, Date . ( ) Final DOT approval on plat { } Final action by the Planning Board • C3 . • ;-,4 r r gP NY MAO - Fl APPtieNdr: I:EMMY MARTIAI .- . . ZoN/A16. : fZ-1 EL5IDENnAL,, Pw-ir PR-Orr-MD WATERSIJE1) 1 — MP PEst&NAriON : PRAAL AUCTelti PR4TterED 111AreksilED ' • 024 __2_2 • 102 ----- - - • ._----- ---- . . 09,p, .....----- .........___ .......----- ......---- ...---*-- 2.57AC. ..------ A c.. CD. • ......----- */4 •3599 L. 548 AC :;..-----_____.,..7-..„ // 14 g34 I /1,./ ...__ ....,. . , , ......._... . 0 - . 1 1 .--•"""-- ' o 50 0 .92 AC. 11 ..--- ------ 8 . s.........__ i1 SEE MAP Fil --- --. ..• I ." 11 298 11 ; - . . ii -,t4dog/ I k • 2558 0 CO ow II _ - - • -1 I I i I I C) 9070 1 1 2L66 AC. 11 rir . r„ ! . 1 1 i •4714 jEAEF, k. 1 mint caws "'' ''' - 4 C) leAC. 1 1 0704 ■ 1 23.12 AC. 28-17A MBL.cT.I i71(2) 1(1-1ENRY a mt I I I . 1 I I PA) 28.021 - 0 841T AC. 18.49 AC- Alf 1 -08 AC. I - . . I 1 • re _ I e II 4346 ct 2 AC. i I I • GAP 1 1 I 1 - 4 • - • I I 8° 1 —11 r I 1 • 6759 • 8779 I i () • 33 AC. 1 I • i1 1 46.5AC. — ....... ••■,.... ...... e l ........ .......__ _ '8465 ,....- ....- 1 li 0 ■••" _.,••• ...., -■ \\ 2284 1\??" ' ....- --...-,--.. .0.- _.---- 10.10 AC. .9183 \ 8.1 AC. 3097."--- --:-Ci'----''' '-'... . Oil , -.- 15_64AC • \\ . ..- \\...• ' '01 \\O 20.11 AC- \ 0\\, a RI 222 AC • \■ \ •65 43 • .0545 SCA'(.6:;t:itoote \NN _ 43.2.7e AC N - I , •,..‘ O2 ? [_0(01Pc, bopro Thwoirts 3 must be addressed. Pearson inquired if the applicant later came back for a subdiision could Staff require Class A road. Collins responded yes but the applicant was wanting the Board to • make a determination before they went to the expense of a surveyor. Pearson continued that the Board had nothing in front of them concerning an extension of the road and that determination could not be made at this time. Gordon stated that it seemed the Board as well as Staff still felt the requirement for a Class A Private Road built to State standards was the best position to take. Motion: Walters moved that the Planning Board reaffirm its motion for a Class A Road from Lot 28 to NC 54. Seconded by Shanklin. Vote: 6 in favor. 1 opposed (Gordon felt it was not clear enough about the future) . )(b. Property of Kenny Martin - Preliminary Presentation by Atwater. The property in question is located on a private road (Elva Lane) off NC Highway 54 in Bingham Township. The property is referenced as part of Lot 4A of Tax Map 29. It is borderd by White Cross Mobile Home Park, residential and commercial development and undeveloped land. The tract is designated as Rural Buffer and Protected Water Supply Watershed in the Land Use Plan. There are three (3) lots proposed out of 4.15 acres. The lot sizes are 2.12 acres, 1.08 acres and .95 acres. The property is zoned Residential-1 (R-1) with an overlay district designation Protected Watershed-II (PW-II) . This property is within the University Lake Watershed. Access to the site is provided via a Class "B" road which leads to NC Highway 54, a road designated as an arterial street in the Land Use Plan. The applicant is required to upgrade the existing Private Drive (Elva Lane) from a Class "B" to a Class "A" road. Also, a Class "C" road will be constructed to provide access to Lot 4C of this subdivision. The property is located in the White Cross Volunteer Fire District. Law enforcement is provided by the Orange County Sheriff's Department. It will be patrolled on a 24 hour basis. 024. 4 Development of the subdivision would have minimal impact on the area. The Planning Staff recommends approval of the Plan subject to the following conditions: (1) label Elva Lane as a Class "A" road on the plat (2) all setbacks be indicated or provide a note on the plat which states the typical setback requirements (3) change the Class "Cm road name from Martin Place to Daylight Drive (Martin Place would constitute a duplicate road name, therefore, the applicant requests that it be changed to Daylight Drive) (4) indicate the lot area for #4A outside of the right-of-way and label as such (5) indicate the distance (in feet) to NC Highway 54 from Elva Lane (6) upon construction of the Class "C" road a swale or french drain system be created. (This condition was impoosed by the Planning Staff upon approving the application for a building permit for the 2.12 acre tract. The swale or french drain system would allow drainage towards the wooded portion of the lot to satisfy the 1/2 inch infiltration standard as specified in Section 6.23.7 of the Zoning Ordinance) . Pilkey inquired if Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 had any access at all to the private drive and Atwater responded that Elva Lane was constructed to access those lots. Mr. Martin, applicant, stated that Lots # 1 and # 3 had access from NC Highway 54. He noted that Price Atwater Road runs along the other property line. Martin noted that he had had Warren Faircloth, S & E Officer come out and look at the road and he told Martin that he would approve the road as a Class A Road up to where the Class C road will be constructed. MOTION: Walters moved approval with staff conditions. Seconded by Yuhasz. Staff condition # 5 was reworded as follows: indicate the distance (in feet) from southern right-of-way line to NC Highway 54 along Elva to the northern property 02E 5 line of Kenny Martin property. VOTE: Unanimous. c. Wedgewood Section 2 - Preliminary Presentation by Kirk. The property in question is located in Cheeks Township off West Lebanon Road (SR 1306) with one lot fronting on Frazier Road (SR 1310) . It is known as part of Lot 7D, Tax Map 12. There are 4 lots proposed out of approximately 10.19 acres. The lot sizes are 2.35 acres, 3.22 acres, 1.95 acres and 2.67 acres. The property is zoned R-1 and subject to PW-II oerlay zoning district standards and is designated Rural- Residential and Upper Eno Waster Supply Watershed in the Land Use Plan. It is located in the Efland Rural Fire District. The addition of 4 lots could add approximately 27 trips per day to the roads in this area. There is no traffic count data available on Frazier Road. A 1981 traffic count indicates 500 trips per day on West Lebanon Road. This subdivision would have minimal impact on the area. The Planning Staff recommends approval with a 30 foot wide drainage easement along the creek through Lots 3, 4, and 5. Walters expressed concern with traffic safety on Lebanon Road at Blue Jasper Lane. He would rather see a redesign with entranceway on Frazier Road. Shanklin also expressed concern with hazardous intersection and insufficient site distance. Collins asked Walters to explain why he preferred an entrancceway onto Frazier Road. Walters responded that the location of Blue Jasper Lane was too close to the interssection. Pearson felt that this would create more traffic problems. Shanklin felt that the stop sign on Frazier Road would help the traffic problem. He noted you could not see Blue Jasper Lane until you were too close to it. Shanklin inquired about lot numbers. Yuhasz responded that there had been some combination of lots due to lack of perk sites. 02E ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date JULY 1, 1,985 Action Agenda Item F. SUBJECT: 0. T. FARRINGTON FAMILY LANDS - MINOR SUBDIVISION - APPROVAL OF CLASS A PRIVATE ROAD DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes X No Attachment(s) Information Contact: SUSAN SMITH VICINITY MAP JANET VAN HANDEL SKETCH PLAN SEE MAY 20, 1985 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES DRAFT 6/3/85 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MINUTES DRAFT 6/17/85 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 PURPOSE: To reconsider approval of a Class A Private Road to serve the minor subdivision of the properties of Curtis Farrington, Tax Map 29 Lots 25 and 28 in Bingham Township. The properties front on Excel. Lane, an unrecorded 20' easement. At the May 20, 1985 Planning Board meeting the Planning Staff recommended approval of a minor subdivision served by a road dedicated public and constructed to state maintained paved road standards. On May 20, 1985 the Planning Board recommended approval of a Class A road to serve the minor subdivision. At their June 3, 1985 meeting, the Board of Commissioners directed that the Planning Board reconsider this item, particularly in terms of potential density and right-of-way problems. At their June 17, 1985 meeting the Planning Board re-affirmed their recommendation of May 20, 1985, NEED: The properties in question are located in Bingham Township of NC 54 and are referenced on Tax Map 29. Several lot. owners along this road desire to subdivide their property. All, of Lots #21-31A are property of the O. T. Farrington Family. Each 7 acre and the 16.5 acre tract were created before Subdivision Regulations went into effect. Therefore, each of these lots can request a minor subdivision. At this time a 50 foot easement across all, lots can be obtained. The property owners would pursue approval of minor subdivisions if the road would be considered a Class A gravel road. 027 O. T. FARRINGTON FAMILY LANDS - MINOR SUBDIVISION - CLASS A PRIVATE ROAD PAGE TWO JULY 1, 1985 If the road is required to be paved, the cost of paving would prohibit any new lots from being created. It is anticipated that all new lots would be sold or given to family members. The Department of Transportation requires that there be at least 2 occupied houses per tenth of a mile (average along the length of the road) for a subdivision road to be eligible for state maintenance, if the road is brought up to state standards. The length of this road (including its proposed extension) is .366 miles. There are 8 existing homes served by Excel Lane or approximately 2 homes per 1/10 of a mile. IMPACT: Approval of a Class A private road (gravel) would result in subdivision of some of the lots. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning staff recommended approval of a road dedicated public and constructed to state-maintained paved subdivision road standards. The Planning Board recommends approval of a Class A private road. .3-/Re345—RAWN/AIG. 344AU115 AVNUTES 19 4 opposed. Motion carried. MOTION: Pilkey moved to extend the meeting to 11:00 p.m. Greenberg seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous. Shanklin left at 10:30. Greenberg asked when the detention pond would be shown on the plat. Smith responded on the Final. MOTION: Yuhasz moved approval with a Class C Road and the restriction that Lot A access be from Ryan Road. Pilkey seconded the motion. VOTE: 7 in favor. 2 opposed (Best, Gordon) Agenda item #81 O.T. Farrington Family Lands - Minor Subdivision- Class A Private Road Presentation by Smith. IV The purpose of this agenda item is to consider approval of a Minor Subdivision with a Class A private road for the properties of Curtis Farrington, Tax Map 29 Lot 25 and 28 in Bingham Township. The properties front on Excel Lane. The properties in question are located in Bingham Township of NC 54 and are referenced on Tax Map 29. Several lot owners along this road desire to subdivide their property. All of Lots #21-31A are property of the O. T. Farrington Family. Each 7 acre parcel and the 16.5 acre tract were created before Subdivision Regulations went into effect. Therefore, each of these lots can request a minor subidvision. At this time a 50 foot easement across all lots can be obtained. The property owners would pursue approval of minor subdivisions if the road would be cosidered a Class A gravel road. If the road is required to be paved, the cost of paving would prohibit any new lots from being created. It is anticipated that all new lots would be sold or given to family members. 20 The Department of Transportation requires that there be at least 2 occupied houses per tenth of a mile • (average along the length of the road) for a subdivision road to be eligible for State maintenance, if the road is brought up to State standards. The length of this road (including its proposed extension) is .366 miles. There are 8 existing homes served by Excel Lane or approximately 2 homes per 1/10 of a mile. Approval of a Class RA" private road (gravel) would result in subdivision of some of the lots. Planning Staff recommended approval of a minor subdivision to be served by a road dedicated public and constructed to State-maintained paved road standards. The Staff was requesting that the Board address the issue of the road only. A minor subdivision served by a Class A road (as required here by the number of lots served) must receive Board approval of the Class A road. Curtis Farrington informed the Board that the property would not be sold9 but was family land. Only 7 lots were currently being used. The purpose of the subdivision is to allow transfer of property to their children and the expense of upgrading the road is tremendous. He indicated he was acting as a spokesperson for the community. He continued that they would like the road to remain as it is, gravel with a 20' easement, and requested that the Board give a variance for that. Kizer responded variances cannot be granted to Subdivision Regulations. Smith clarified the Board could only allow a 25' partical width right-of-way of a full 50' easement. Yuhasz asked which lot is to be subdivided. Smith identified Curtis Farrington's lots but noted that other owners were interested in subdividing. Farrington responded he did not want or need to subdivide. Margison asked if the road allows for emergency vehicles access. Farrington responded yes. 031 21 Gordon asked if a limit on the number of lots could be set. Smith asked what number is appropriate. Yuhasz noted that at some point the road needs to be paved. Farrington asked why a variance could not be granted. Smith explained that the law does not allow variance to the Subdivision Regulations. Farrington asked why a public road was required. Smith responded because of the number of lots served. Farrington noted that this was family property. Smith responded that ownership could not be guaranteed over time. Walters noted most financial institutions require a 50' right-of-way for lending purposes. Gordon noted there was a question whether at issue was subdivision of Curtis Farrington's property or subdivision of all of the lots of record. MOTION: Kizer moved approval of a Class A road. Pilkey seconded the motion. VOTE: 8 in favor. 1 opposed (Gordon) . Kizer noted this decision on the road class was a compromise. Adjournment time was again reached. It was the consensus of the Board, since citizens were here for questions about some of the items going to public hearing, that each one be given two to three minutes to make their statements or ask questions. Agenda Item #9a) Smith brought the Board up-to-date on illegal activities on Chandler Concrete property. Owner has ceased operation on this property and enforcement is no longer in question. Agenda Item #9b) George Horton stated that he was at the meeting to answer any questions anyone would have about the subdivision. Pilkey enquired how many exits were planned onto US 70 and Mr. Horton responded seven (7) . 031 DRAFT Minutes of the June 3, 1985 Board of Commissioners' Fleeting NOTE: Commissioner Norman Walker was absent. 0. T. FARRINGTON FAMILY LANDS - MINOR Planner Susan Smith presented for consideration of approval a Minor Subdivision with a Class A Private Road for the properties of Curtis Farrington, Tax Map 29, Lot 25 and 28 in Bingham Township. The applicant requested that the two lots be allowed to be subdivided utilizing the Class C road which presently exists. He indicated he would accept Class A but would not be able to pursue the construction' of a state maintained road. The Planning Staff recommended a state maintained road because of the number of lots and the nature of the road. The Planning Board recommended approval of a minor subdivision served by a Class A road. Dr. Gordon indicated there was a question of how much development may occur since each of the lots could be divided. The applicant requested the Planning Board's decision apply to all lots along Excel Lane. The Board voted on only lots 25 and 28. Commissioner Marshall noted that the potential for development is such that a public hearing should be provided for each request. Motion was made by Commissioner Marahnll, seconded by Chair Willhoit to approve the recommendation from the Planning Staff. VOTE: AYES, 2; NOES, 2 (Commissioners Carey and Lloyd). Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner Carey to accept the recommendation from the Planning Board for a minor subdivision to be served by a Class A road. Commissioner Marshall noted that approving a Class A road for these two lots would put the County in an unattainable position for approving like requests. In answer to a question from Chair Willhoit, Susan Smith stated that because this road has never been recorded there would not be a mechanism for paving in the future unless the road was brought up to full state standards. DRAFT MINUTES (CONTINUED) 03< VOTE: Ayes, 2; Noes, 2 (Chair Wilihoit and. Commissioner Mare-hail ) Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Carey to send this item back to the Planning Board and request than to address the problem of potential density on the road and the problem of right-of-way. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. O3' 1 DRAFT MINUTES ' PLANNING BOARD MEETING JUNE 17, 1985 MEMBERS PRESENT: Alice Gordon (Chair) , Peter Kramer, Frank Pearson, Sharlene Pilkey, David Shanklin, Carl Walters, Steve Yuhasz MEMBERS ABSENT: Chris Best, Ruth Burnette, Valerie Greenberg, Steve Kizer, Betty Margison (All unexcused) STAFF PRESENT: Marvin Collins, Eddie Kirk, Joanna Bradshaw, Jane Atwater (8:05) , Susan Smith (8:20) Agenda Item #6 SUBDIVISION APPLLICATIONS 44a. Curtis Farrington - Minor - Class A Private Road The purpose of this agenda item is to reconsider approval of a Class A Private Road to serve the minor subdivision of the properties of Curtis Farrington, Tax Map 29 Lots 25 and 28 in Bingham Township. The properties front on Excel Lane, an unrecorded 20' easement. At the May 20, 1985 Planning Board meeting the Planning Staff recommended approval of a minor subdivision served by a road dedicated public sand constructed to state maintained paved road standards. On May 20, 1985 the Planning Board recommended approval of a Class A road to serve the minor subdivision. At their June 3 1985 meeting, the Board of Commissioners directed that the Planning Board reconsider this item, particularly in terms of potential density and right-of-way problems. 034 2 The properties in question are located in Bingham Township) off NC 54 and are referenced on Tax Map 29. Several lot owners along this road desire to dsubdivide their property. All of Lots #21-31A are property of the O. T. Farrington family. Each 7 acre and the 16.5 acre tract were created before Subdivision Regulations went into effect. Therefore, each of these lots can request a minor subdivision. At this time a 50 ffot easement across all lots can be obtained. The property owners would pursue approval of minor subdivisi if the road would be considered a Class A gravel road. If the road is required to be paved, the cost of paving would prohibit any new lots from being created. It is anticipated that all new lots would be sold or given to family members. The Department of Transportation requires that there be at least 2 occupied houses per tenth of a mile (average along the length of the road) for a subdivision road to be eligible for state maintenance, if the road is brought up to state standards. The length of this road (including its propsed extension) is .366 miles. There are 8 existing homes served by Excel Lane or approximately 2 homes per 1/10 of a mile. Approval of a Class A private road (gravel) would result in subdivision of some of the lots. As this item was sent back to the Planning Board from Board of Commissioners for reconsideration, Gordon presented comments from Commissioners. The Commissioners expressed concnern with immediate relief for the Farrington family from •the problem of having an illegal subdivision and the family was concerned about future development. Walters expressed concerns with the road out to NC 54. He felt there would do problems later if the Class A Private Road were allowed now. Collins noted that if the applicant could get another 5 feet easement he would qualify for a partial width right-of-way. Walters again expressed concern with the fact that the applicant did not have easement out to NC 54. Yuhasz stated that he would like to see some mechanism by which all the people who would profit by a paved road would have to contribute to the cost of paving whether now or later. Gordon noted that the concerns of the Board of Commissioners 03b 3 must be addressed. Pearson inquired if the applicant later came back for a subdiision could Staff require Class A road. Collins responded yes but the applicant was wanting the Board to make a determination before they went to the expense of a surveyor. Pearson continued that the Board had nothing in front of them concerning an extension of the road and that determination could not be made at this time. Gordon stated that it seemed the Board as well as Staff still felt the requirement for a Class A Private Road built to State standards was the best position to take. Motion: Walters moved that the Planning Board reaffirm its motion for a Class A Road from Lot 28 to NC 54. Seconded by Shanklin. t Vote: 6 in favor. 1 opposed (Gordon felt it was not clear enough about the future) . b. Property of Kenny Martin - Preliminary Presentation by Atwater. The property in question is located on a private road (Elva Lane) off NC Highway 54 in Bingham Township. The property is referenced as part of Lot 4A of Tax Map 29. It is borderd by White Cross Mobile Home Park, residential and commercial development and undeveloped land. The tract is designated as Rural Buffer and Protected Water Supply Watershed in the Land Use Plan. There are three (3) lots proposed out of 4.15 acres. The lot sizes are 2.12 acres, 1.08 acres and .95 acres. The property is zoned Residential-1 (R-1) with an overlay district designation Protected Watershed-II (PW-II) . This property is within the University Lake Watershed. Access to the site is provided via a Class "B" road which leads to NC Highway 54, a road designated as an arterial street in the Land Use Plan. The applicant is required to upgrade the existing Private Drive (Elva Lane) from a Class "B" to a Class "A" road. Also, a Class "Cu road will be constructed to provide access to Lot 4C of this subdivision. The property is located in the White Cross Volunteer Fire District. Law enforcement is provided by the Orange County Sheriff's Department. It will be patrolled on a 24 hour basis. ORANGE COUNTY 036 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT MEETING DATE July 1, 1985 Action Agenda Item # SUBJECT: Z-7-85 GEORGE HORTON DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes X No • Attachment(s) Information Contact: EDDIE KIRK SEE MAY 28, 1985 PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA DRAFT 5/28/85 PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES MATERIALS SUBMITTED AT 5/28/85 PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT 6/17/85 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 PURPOSE: To consider a proposed rezoning request, presented at public hearing on May 28, 1985. To receive the Planning Board recommendation of June 17, 1985. NEED: C. D. Hogue is requesting a rezoning for George Horton on 86.51 acres out of 103 acres of land located along Highway 70 Business southeast of Hillsborough. The 16.49 acres remaining will not be changed from present R-1 zoning designation. The property is referenced as Tax Map 40 Block A Lots 11 and 14 of Hillsborough Township. The property is located in an area designated as Ten Year Transition and Commercial Industrial Activity Node in the Orange County Land Use Plan. The present zoning is R-1. The applicants are requesting 26.65 acres to be rezoned to OI and 59.86 acres to be rezoned I-1. IMPACT: Approval of the request would allow Office-Institutional uses on the 16.65 acres and Industrial-1 uses on the 59.86 acres. A 1984 traffic count on Business 70 indicated 1200 trips per day. On N.C. 86 between Business 70 and Valley Forge Road (SR 1200) a 1984 traffic count indicated 4200 trips per day. If the 59.86 acres proposed to be zoned I-i were developed approximately 3,137 trips per day could be generated. If the 26.65 acres proposed to be zoned OI were developed, an additional 3,866 trips would possibly be generated. Unless some other type of access is obtained, all of this traffic would be directed to U.S. 70 Business. O3" Z-2-85 GEORGE HORTON PAGE TWO July 1, 1985 According to the Department of Transportation U.S. 70 Business is presently classified at service level C or better. At the current speed limit of 45 mph and given a 20' travelway, the capacity of U.S.70 Business at service level C is estimated to be 5,770 trips per day. RECOMMENDATION! The Planning Staff recommended denial given potential traffic impacts and demands on public water and sewer facilities. The Planning Board recommends approval. i RECOMMENDED-,FINDINGS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY PLANNINGI;BOARD PERTAINING TO APPLICATION: Z-7-85 GEORGE HORTON BASED ON THE MATERIALS SUBMITTED AT PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING BOARD RECO14MENDS THAT THERE IS EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS., ARTICLE 20 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING ARTICLE 20 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING ("Yes" Indicates compllance; "No" Indicates Noncompliance PLANTING BOARD 'BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Ordinance Requirements RECOMMENDED FINDINGS EVIDENCE SUBMITTED TO SUPPORT FINDINGS FINDINGS The application :rust comply with all requirements specl- fled. in Article 20 - Amend- ments. Those requirements include: 20,32 a) Map showing affected X Yes No Site Plan provided at scale of Yes No property at scale of not less 1"=100' —' than I '= 100" nor more than 1'= 20' 20.3.2 b) Legal description of Yes No Description provided with application Yes No property — 20.3.2 c) Explanation of alleged X Yes No No error alleged Yes No error, if any, to be corrected by proposed amendment 20.3.2 d) Changed conditions, if X Yes No The 1-1 property is located next to the Yes No any, which make amendment reasona- interstate and other property zoned 1-3 and GC-4- bly necessary to promote public The Ol .property would be buffered from the present health, safety and general welfare. 1-3 zone by the 1-1 and located along US 70 Business. 20.3.2 e) Manner in which proposed Yes No The property is located in a Tey-Year Yes No amendment w I I I carry out purpose Transition Area and Commercial Industrial C and intent of adopted Comprehensive Transition Activity Node. W Plan. m ....._.._._............. ARTICLE It - DISTRICT STATEMENTS OF INTEREST AND APPLICATION CRITERIA BOARD OF PLANNING BOARD COMMISSIONERS Ordinance Requirements RECOMMENDED FINDINGS EVIDENCE SUBMITTED TO SUPPORT• FINDINGS FINDINGS Article 4.2 indentifles the criteria which will normally be used to determine the Ca application of a zoning district cn designation. The applicant has applied for a 01 designation. The criteria for that district are set forth in Article 4.2.3 and are as follows: a) Designated by the adopted Land Yes No Applicant has •IndIcated the property is Yes No Use Plan as a Transition Area, in a Ten-Year Transition area and Commercial/ which can reasonably be expedted Industrial Transition Activity Node. t annexed by a municipality in the ensuing 10-20 years. b) Water and sewer lines should Yes No Applicant has submitted a letter con- Yes No exist at site or be assured of cerning water & sewer extension from installation as part of the the Town of Hillsborough. development process. c) Vehicular access must consist —X Yes No Apolicant does have direct access .to a Yes No of di recC access to a street classified as either arterial street classified as an arterial, i or collector as designated by the adopted Land Use Plan. d) Site would provide a buffer or _.Yes No - Not applicable.,. Yes No step down in intensity of land use in a Neighborhood or Community Activity Node e) Normally the meximum amount of X Yes No Applicant is requesting 26.65 acres Yes Mo land zoned to this 011 classification shall w zoned 01 . Because this is not a normal not exceed five acres. situation, the Planning Board finds positively on the amount of acreage proposed. ARTICLE 4 - DISTRICT STATEMENTS OF INTEREST AND APPLICATION CRITERIA Board Planning Board Commissioners Ordinance Requirements ReGommenaed Fitnd i ligs Eii i dence Submitted to Support Findings F i nd i ngs :r Article 4.2 Identifies the criteria which will normally be used to determine the application of a zoning district designation. The applicant has applied for a OM designation. The Criteria for that d;i:strict are set forth in Article 4.2.3 and are as follows: a) The site is located outside of X Yes No Applicant has indicated the property is in Yes No the Chapel Hill Joint Planning Area a Ten-Year Transition area and Commercial/ and within an Industrial Transition Industrial Transition Activity Node. Activity Node or a Rural Industrial Activity Node. b) Lot size for individual uses X Yes No Applicant has submitted a letter concerning Yes No shall be appropriate to the method _oT_ water & sewer extension. from the Town of Hillsborough water supply and sewage disposal. and has indicated that public services will be utilized. The proposed tot size exceeds requirements for on-site c) Access would consist of direct X Yes No septic systems. vehicular access to streets designated Site has direct access to a street classified Yes No either arterial or collector by the as an arterial . Oral comments received from Land Use Plan. Access to rail service NCDOT indicate that site access and road improvements for is desireable but not requtired. US ]O be carefully considered during driveway permit process and recommends that the applicant prepare an origin-destination study to provide information on these matters. G n D urnvU 071 ,. 041 • des2zp. =‘,/s; /9 "r- id.: L9447. r•e&x. ..a......7 - D.te.... ...-t-. .3°. / - 1 ..... ,,e4,1L, - 4- .zez, .iee.e......g. I _ . .. ,.., alo ••44- dam . ` - :zAt- .. - �' e- ..�/ ..,....4,...... - irii�:� r f,_ , - fzifia: -Gm f car ' .�°%� L ...di-1* u efe-ile-Letivi-4-0 ,0,. e. ...J -- - .. ..), -;er24 --7-fr'era?"-7e e. z-- --re;_, # - ,LL,r/, ' /, jI,,,.,,1 l/r'74 ' '44‘e4 +i r'‘'°41' . frit:z z I t; '‘ '7 — "374 ft--eui,vc,, NI/vc:77.-, 042 8 M. C. Allison, a resident in Strayhorn Hills since 1978, spoke for residents of his immediate neighborhood. He noted damage done to vehicles due to rocks being thrown by concrete trucks. There were places where the cement had been emptied on the side of the road. • Willard Cates, resident of Byrdsville for 12 years, expressed concern with traffic problems, debris and concrete spillage on sides of the road and near stop sign. Agenda Item #2) Z-7-85 George Horton .. ,i°\6' Presentation by Collins. This agenda item is to receive a proposed rezoning request scheduled for George Horton. C. D. Hogue is requesting a rezoning for George Horton on 86.51 acres out of 103 acres of aind located along Highway 70 Business southeast of Hillsborough. The 16.49 acres remaining will not be changed from present R-1 zoning. designation. The property is referenced as Tax Map 40 Block A Lots 11 and 14 of Hillsborough Township. The property is located in an area designated as Ten Year Transition and Commercial Industrial Activity Node in the Orange County Land Use Plan. The present zoning is R-1. The appalicants are requesting 26.65 acres to be rezoned to OI and 59.86 acres to be rezoned I-1. Approval of the request would allow Office-institutional uses on the 16.65 acres and Industrial-1 uses on the 59.86 acres. A 1984 traffic count on Business 70 indicated 1200 trips per day. On N.C. 856 between Business 70 and Valley Forge Road (SR 1200) a 1984 traffic count indicated 4200 trips per day. if the 59.86 acres proposed to be zoned I-1 were developed • approximately 3,137 trips per day could be generated. If the 26.65 acres proposed to be zoned OI were developed, an additional 3,866 trips would possibly be generated. Unless some other type of access is obtained, all of this traffic • would be directed to U.S. 70 Business. According to the Department of Transportation U.S. 70 Business is presently classified at service level C or better. At the current speed limit of 45 MPH and given a 20' travelway, the capacity of U.S. 70 Business at service level C is estimated to bne 5,770 trips per day. e 1 4 9 0 The Planning Staff recommends denial given potential traffi. impacts and demands on public water and sewer facilities. Collins reviewed the criteria for rezoning as required b . the zoning ordinance. He stated that the finding of the Planning Staff was tha' the applicant has not complied with the criteria in tha' water and sewer mains are not presently available to serv- • th site. A letter from the Town of Hillsborough has bee received stating that the Town is willing to permit th. owner to the Town water system providing all necessar requirments are met. The County Attorney, Geof Gledhill ha:: indicated to the Planning Department that such a letter doe- not assure the connection to the Town of Hillsborough wate • and sewer system in that it is a conditional approval on th= part of the Town of Hillsborough. The conditional park being all the requirements of the state. Also the criteria for activity node maximum amount of land zoned to 0-I shall not exceed 5 acres. Applicant is requesting 26.65 acres be zoned OI. The criteria for Il has been met. Walker inquired of the reasoning for a Planned Development since traffic and water/sewer . problems would still exist. Collins responded that Planned Development would require a Spcial Use Permit and undek the Special Use Process staff, Pinning board and Commissioners could address the adverse impacts of excess traffic generation, needed thoroughfare improvements and assurance that water and sewer lines are adequate to serve the property. Walker asked if this condition could not be added. Collins • responded that conditions• could not be added to a straight rezoning. Collins noted that the County would lose all control over the ? if the property were zoned now. Collins continued that DOT had traditionally relied on local government to set down conditions. - - Walters inquired if the commercial industrial activity node srrounding the I-85, NC 86 inferchange covered this property. Collins responded yes. it is clear in the LUP that this area is suitable for commercial and/or industrial development. Planning Staff., felt that a Planned Development would give the County more control. Pearson inquired if this property were in the FTC corridor and Collins responded yes. Pearson continued should not 044 10 this be the concern instead of traffic. Collins noted that te only thing that could be addressed through the MTC requirement was the provision for 100' buffer adjacent to I- 85. The Landscaping and screening requirement would apply to any commercial/industrial actrivity of this type. Collins noted a letter had been recieved in opposition from Bob Perera, adjacent property owner. Horace Johnson, Supervisor of water and sewer extension for Town of Hillsborough, asked to clear up misconception on water and sewer for this project. He noted that he personally would endorse this project for he economic benefits and the increase tax base of Town of Hillsborough. Town has a checklist of 14 steps to go through in installing lines. Water pressure is good in this area and in less than 1000 feet, project could hook onto water system. Also less than one mile force main can hook into waste treatment system. If there are situations that need correcting, the developer takes care of all of these to be able to connect to the system. The water pressure in this area is much greater than in any other part of billsborough. He noted there were pressure problems north of town and at prsent there is a moratorium in that area. Gordon asked if the Town can confer with the County and reach an agreement on a stronger letter about the availability of water and sewer service. Mr. Johnson referred again to the checklist and Gordon asked if it would be possible to get an idea how well the developer could meet the checklist. The water • superintendent and Mr. Johnson go over the checklist- with • the developer and after he has met all the conditions, plans are sent for State approval and then approval of Town Board. Mr. Johnson noted that the Town Board fully endorses this project. George Horton, applicant, stated that he is a developer of residential property and that he moved to Hillsborough from New Jersey in June 1984. - He has been working with Sylvia Price and all of the people involved and wants to develop thi unique property in a way that as much as possible will be preserved. He is aware of the traffic problem and has hired Kimberly Horne of Raleigh to do a traffic analysis and report of potential traffic problems. At the present time, i is not known just what the market is and flexibility is • needed to go out and present to potential customer and • design buildings to fit their needs. He continued that he 04F- 11 fet the only way the site could be developed is through rezoning. He sees extreme difficulties in trying to adher: to a planned development. The development would be multiple of buildings. He also is aware that sewer servic- could be a problem but sewer lines could not be brought to th site until Horton is sure he has a project. The traffic problems would vary due to the types of industr that were in the project. Mr. Horton expressed desire t. have quality development preserving as much of the site a- possible. Rufus Colter, planner for Mr. Horton, expressed the through that the industrial park concept prevailing throughout th- prject is what is desired by the applicant. He felt thi type development would sustain the high value of the site and be profitable to the Town of Hillsborough. Planning Board Chair Gordon reminded citizens that the issue seems to be whether to go for straight rezoning or planned development. She explained the differences in the two approaches. Lynn Moredock, of NC Museum of Art and Science spoke regarding plant rescue and requested that the pond site be preserved for the sake of wildlife area around it. Michael Drown expressed concerns regarding traffic and basic supply of water for the area. He also had concerns with buffer zones. He noted that Mr. Horton had gone out of his way to meet approval of local residents and listen to their cncerns. Drowns also expressed the desire for Planned Development. Mayor Sheffield spoke in support of the Horton rezoning for the Town Board by reading the recommendation from the Board. (see page of these minutes) . He noted he would be in favor of Planned Development only if the desired flexibility can be retained for the Industrial Park. He felt straight rezoning was the best way to go and that the water/sewer extension is under control. Traffic needs to be addressed and DOT assistnce can help stay ahead of this problems. He expressed confidence in Mr. Horton to provide and assure high quality development. Nelson Butts owns property adjoining Horton track and he feels more confident in the kind of project Mr. Horton is proposing than other he has seen. Traffic, in his opinion is a major problem. 04E 12 Sylvia Price, EDC Director, brought the hearing up to dat. on the reasons for BOCC creating EDC. She expressed th. feeling that this project meets all the criteria of the LU! and the needs of the area. With competition being so keen we need to be able to offer choices to prospective client- and one of the choices would be an industrial park. Th. • other choice is individual sites. EDC decided last year t• promote the industrial park idea. We do need both option- tobe able to attract this kind of industry we want and nee. in Orange County. She urged the Boards to consider the rezoning of th. property. Cormann Drumm, NC Dept. of Commerce, stated that Industrie Park, with restrictive comments are becoming popular within the state. Industrial Parks when properly graded, preserve- he aesthetic value of the property. He siter some park around the state that are good examples of qualit development. He statd that he feels prezoning is mandatory. If the zoning is not available, prospective clients do not even consider an area. Businesses looking for Industrial Parks go to the State for guidance. This too, would help assure Orange County that unsuitable industry would not be directed this way. - - Greenberg inquired if Mr. Drumm felt that would hinder the goals that EDC had mentioned. • Durmm responded that he felt that Plasnning Development of this type is very difficult when you don't know all the types of industry that may be interested in development in the area. Sylvia Price also was asked this question of Planned Development versus straight rezoning. She responded that • thi was not like a subdivision. You do not know the exact size, shape, and number of buildings. Basically, you need to be able to tell clients you will build to meet their individual needs. Walker noted the question of whether planned development would be determintal had not been answered. Price responded that in a project such as this you could not do an accurate or adequate planned development. If the clients didn't want the kind of building shown on the plan, the whole process, which kills client relationship would have to be gone through again. Willhoit noted that EDC was concerned with pre-zoning and he 047 13 also understood Planning Staffs and Boards desire to hav planned development. He felt EDC had been working clearly with Horton and th= desire was to make this a model type development and set - pattern for future development. He noted the 4 major part' of planned development - access (roads) , screening, buildin. • nd parking and landscaping. He stated that perhaps therz could be pre-zoning but planned development to cove . landscaping and screening. • Price responded these criterias would have to be met Clients would not look at sites that were not zoned. Willhoit noted that perhaps in the future for planne. development in Industrial Parks would be for the planne. dept to deal with the questions and screening. Perhap- planned development standards do not fit well with industri- park type development. Marshall noted that it may be worthwhile for the Board t. look at what it could do to facilitate this development particularly when it's in a major transportation corridor. The group of regulation may not be complete but there will still be some control over the rezoning rather than just looking at Industrial Parks alone. Price urged the rezoning and watching the development closely. John Gastineau, chairman of EDC, spoke of the need for industrial parks. This site has been identified as the best choice for the first park in the County. Be feels the Horton project meets all the important criteria for quality development of the kind Orange County is seeking. Henrietta Almon, adjoining property owner, stated she had lived in this area for forty years. She expressed concern with buffer zone and she asked for assurance of supervision • once the work begins. 4 ...17 palthv fid 6 /349/1z-D m V PRA Fr 04 '6 8 Agenda Item 7a LOP-2-85 CHANDLER CONCRETE CO. , INC. PNVed la 7//c AT ARGLiatlevrts AEI:NEST 76 NW"' RR) • Agenda Item 47b: )0(Z-7-85 C. D. HOGUE FOR GEORGE HORTON Gordon introduced the item. MOTION: Yuhasz moved positive findings on Article 20. Pearson seconded the motion, VOTE: Unanimous The Board reviewed the findings for the OI district. MOTION: Pearson moved positive findings on Article 4.2a. Yuhasz seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous. The Board discussed finding 4.2b. Walters noted Horace Johnson's comments at the public hearing. Pearson felt that the letter from the Town of Hillsborough constituted assurance. Kramer inquired about ways to guarantee assurance. Smith responded the Town could establish a service district or approve preliminary plans. Pearson responded the applicant does not yet know the facilities needed. Yuhasz asked staff to read the criteria from the Zoning Ordinance. . Collins read 4.2.1. (b)3 and 4.2.2.1 (b)2. Pearson suggested that improvements would be required at the lime of subdivision review. Yuhasz felt that the County was asking for more than the ordinance requires. Collins responded that the staff position was based partly on the attorney's position and partly on action taken on previous projects. He expressed concern about setting a precedent here and raised the questionjf inequitable decisions. Pearson again stressed that the Town's wording has been clarified and a 16 step policy adopted. Collins responded that the letter has not changed enough to alter the staff position on satisfaction of the requirement. Pearson responded that then no development could take place. Collins indicated it is the position of the County that services preceded rezoning. Gordon noted there was sentiment on the Board that the Ordinance be revised to provide for an intermediate step. 04E 9 MOTION: Pearson moved a positive finding on 4.2b. Walters seconded the motion. VOTE: In favor (5) - Pearson, Yuhasz, Kramer, Shanklin, Walters Opposed (2) - Pilkey, Gordon Motion carried. MOTION: sPearson moved a positive finding on 4.2c. Walters seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous The Board indicated item 4.2d was "not applicable" by consensus. The Board discussed finding 4.2e. Walters inquired about building sites under this item. Collins responded the acreage restriction applied to all land in the area, not individual building sites. Gordon responded why this restriction ws included in the Zoning Ordinance. Smith indicated that it likely reflected the lack of experience with non-residential development in the County. Pearson noted the provision included the word "normally". Smith responded the wording allowed for some flexibility. Gordon questioned how one interprets the term "normally". MOTION: Pearson moved a positive finding on the amount of acerage proposed because this is not a normal situation. Kramer seconded the motion. Walters noted that the zoning lot size restriction was not normal for an industrial park. Yuhasz felt the proposed meets the exception implied in the term "normally". Gordon noted this is not a normal request as defined by the Ordinance. Pilkey indicated that until the Ordinance is revised, the proposal does not meet the ordinance requirements. VOTE: In Favor (5) Pearson, Yuhasz, Shanklin, Kramer, Walters Opposed (2) - Gordon, Pilkey. Motion carried. 05C 10 The Board reviewed the findings for the I-1 district. MOTION: Pearson moved positive findings on Article 4.2a,b,and c. Yuhasz seconded the motion. Gordon asked why staff had given a positive recommendation. Smith responded that the criteria for water and wastewater treatment for I-1 differed from 0-I in that it allowed for development on wdll and septic tank. VOTE: Unanimous. MOTION: Pearson moved approval of the rezoning. Walters seconded the motion. VOTE: In favor (5) - Pearson, Walters,Yuhasz, Shanklin, Kramer • Opposed (2) - Gordon Pilkey Gordon noted that the ordinance needed bo be revised to address industrial parks and to streamline the ordinance. She noted staff did a good job of applying the Ordinance and reviewing precedents in this case. Yuhasz felt that the planned development could not be used for industrial development as there are too many unknowns. Agenda Item #7c: Z:z2=1.13Thmmi, Emram Yuhasz indicated he would be abstaining on this item due to •conflict of interest. MOTION: Walters moved positive findings on Article 20 Pilkey seconded the motion. VOTE; Unanimous Yuhasz abstaining MOTION: Pearson moved approval of 4.2.e Kramer seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Yuhasz abstaining The Board discussed item 4.2.b Smith clarified that the Town staff had informed her that the letter regarding water and sewer was not issued for the ORANGE COUNTY 051 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date July 1. 1985 Action Agenda Item # SUBJECT: Z-9-85 (Rezoning Request) James I. Freeland DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes .JL No Attachment(s) Information Contact: EDDIE KIRK SEE MAY 28, 1985 PUbLIC HEARING AGENDA DRAFT 5/28/85 PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES DRAFT 6/17/85 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 PURPOSE: To consider a proposed rezoning request, presented at public hearing on May 28, 1985. To receive, the Planning Board recommendation of June 7, 1985. NEED: James L. Freeland has requested a rezoning for 1.5 acres of land located along Faucette Mill Road (SR 1328) north of Hillsborough. The purpose of the request is to permit higher density residential development than is presently allowed. The property in question is Lot 25 Block A of Orange County Tax Map 5, Hillsborough Township. The present zoning classification is (A-R) Agricultural-Residential, while the requested designation is R-4, 4 residential units/acre. The Land Use Plan for this property was amended on January 7, 1985. The designation was changed from Agricultural Residential to Ten Year Transition. IMPACT: Approval of the request would allow a density of 10,000 sq. ft. per dwelling unit instead of the 40,000 sq. ft. that is presently allowed. A 1984 traffic count on Faucette Mill Road indicated a traffic count of 500 trips per day. If this 1.5 acres is developed at an R-4, density an additional 40 trips per day would be added to the road. DOT has indicated that driveway access should be determined in compliance with sight distance requirements. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Board recommends denial on the basis that the criteria for rezoning have not been satisfied. ,v"-o-rg r /carp/nO /Vale- h` fzt#46 /4MI real problem cited. he described the property and noted i • was on a transition area. 052 Reid Roberts indicated that neither he nor C.D. Smith no Jery Van Webster were notified of the public Hearing. Snit responded that all property owners within S00 feet of tb property are notified an&.that in the case o Scotttswood, labels for certified, return-receipt notice were prepared by Data Processing. McAdams expressed adverse to negotiate with staff az receive father input. ACTION; Commissioner Carey moved to continue • the public . hearir until July 1, 1955. Marshall seconded the motion. Attorney Coleman advised the Board to readvertise the publi hearing and renotify adjacent property owners. TOTE: The motion carried unanimously. Ngenda Item # °.. . JAMES L. FRRELAND REZONING NTT • . Presentation by Collins. Barbara Paige representive of the Hillsborough Plannia Board noted that the public water and sewer lines for th. area were uanpproved and subject to a connectioe moratorium. There were no further comments on this item. Agenda Item # WEST 10 oB3LE' ARK • • - Presentation by Smith. - Smith introduced the May 24, 19 letter from Philip Post and Associates into the record a introduced five photos submitted by the applicant • existing parks identifying the proposed park. people were sworn in. Vickie Bletso, property owner along Squires Road, express opposition to the project, specifically addressing each three general findings. She cited concerns with traffi outdated trip data and compatibility with existing use She submitted an appraisal comment prepared by John Sharpe. She also entered -into the record five photograr • of the site area and one photograph alleged to be of t mobile home park owned by one of the applicants. continued addressing general finding #3 indicating that th project is in compliance with the Land Use Plan then i not supportive of the plan citing aesthet: inconsistencies with a stable neighborhood; lack of s: vegetation and screening/landscaping details; desire : reduction of the number of units to one per five acres; a desire to redesign the- park to locate the units fort] back on the site. Darrell Garrett, applicant made a presentation on - rrn-ies..i+ FINDINGS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD PERTAINING TO APPLICATION: Z-9-85 JAMES L. FREELAND BASED ON THE MATERIALS SUBMITTED AT PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT THERE IS EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: ARTICLE 20 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING ARTICLE 20 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING ("Yes" indicates com liencd• "No" Indicates Noncom Hance BOARD OF PLANNING BOARD COMMISSIONERS RECOMMENDED FINDINGS EVIDENCE SUBMITTED TO SUPPORT FINDINGS : FI NDI NGS Ordinance Requirements The application must comply with all requirements specl- fied in Article 20 - Amend- menus. Those requirements include: 20.32 a) Map showing affected X Yes No Site Plan provided at scale of Yes No property at scale of not less 1"=50; than 1 '- 100" nor more than 1'- 20' 20.3.2 b) Legal description of XYes No Description provided with application. Yes No property 20.3.2 c) Explanation of alleged Yes No No error alleged. Yes No error, i f any, to be corrected by proposed amendment 20.3.2 d) Changed conditions , if X Yes No Property immediately adjacent is .located Yes No any, which make amendment reasona- in the Town of Hillsborough's zoning jurisdiction and bly necessary to promote public zoned R-20. Lots in the county's jurisdl-ction raq= health, safety and general welfare. from half-acre in size to several acres. CR ('aZ 20.3.2 e) Manner in which proposed Yes No Property is located in a Ten-year Yes _No amendment will carry out purpose Transition area as designated in the adopted Land Use and intent of adopted Comprehensive Plan. R-4 is a permitted zoning district in this area. Plan. ARTICLE 11 - DISTRICT STATEMENTS OF INTEREST AND APPLICATION CRITERIA BOARD OF C PLANNING BOARD Ordinance Requirements RECOMMEND FINDINGS EVIDENCE SUBMITTED TO SUPPORT FINDINGS COMMISSIONERS FINDINGS Article 4.2 indentifles the criteria which will normally be used to determine the application of a Zoning district designation. The app 11 cant has applied for a R-4 designation. The criteria for that district are set forth in Article 4.2.3 and are as fol 1 ows: a) Designated by the adopted Land Yes No The property is located within an area Yes No Use Plan as a Transition Area, which can reasonably be expected designated Ten-Year Transition.- to be annexed by a municipality in the ensuing 10-20 years. b) Water and sewer lines should Yes _No Applicant has not obtained a letter from the--Yes No exist at site or be assured of . Town of Hillsborough applicable to development installation as part of the of this property at R-4 densities. development process. c) Vehicular access must consist Yes X No Applicant does not have direct access to a Yes No of direct access to a street street classified as either arterial or collector. classified as either arterial Faucette Mill Road, by--definition of the. Zoning or collector as designated Ordinance, would be considered a subcoilector based on by the adopted Land Use Plan. the number of trips per day and the number of units served. The 1984 count on this road indicated 500 trips per day. 05 real problem cited, he described the property and noted it was on a transition area. Reid Roberts indicated that neither he nor C.D. Smith nor Jery Van Webster were notified of the public Bearing. Smith responded that all property owners within 500 feet of the subject property are notified and that in the case of Scotttswood, labels for certified, return-receipt notices were prepared by Data Processing. McAdams expressed adverse to negotiate with staff and receive futher imput. MOTION: Commissioner Carey moved to continue the public hearing until July 1, 1985. Marshall seconded the motion. • Attorney Coleman advised the Board to readvertise the public hearing and renotify adjacent property owners. VOTE: The motion carried unanimously. Agenda Item # JAMES L. FREELAND REXONING RAFT 4 f/17le:fric—aFilivir4c.. Presentation by Collins. ref/ Barbara Paige representive of the Hillsborough Planning Board noted that the public water and sewer lines for this area were uanpproved and subject to a connections moratorium. There were no further comments on this item. Agenda Item # WEST 10 MOBILE PARK Presentation by Smith. . Smith introduced the May 24, 1985 letter from Philip Post and Associates into the record and introduced five photos submitted by the applicant of • existing parks identifying the proposed park. people were sworn in. Vickie Bletso, property owner along Squires Road, expressed opposition to the project, specifically addressing each of three general findings. She cited concerns with traffic, outdated trip data and compatibility with existing uses. She submitted an appraisal comment prepared by John W. Sharpe. She also entered into the record five photographs of the site area and one photograph alleged to be of ' the • mobile home park owned by one of the applicants. She continued addressing general finding #3 indicating that if th project is in compliance with the Land Use Plan then she i not supportive of the plan citing aesthetics inconsistencies with a stable neighborhood; lack of site vegetation and screening/landscaping details; desire for reduction of the number of units to one per five acres; and a desire to redesign the park to locate the units further back on the site. Darrell Garrett, applicant made a presentation on the Proiect. He deserihAd 1-ha eil-a =nel 05E FAV 6 -065 PcA/timmid 6044D M 10 The Board reviewed the findings for the I-I district. MOTION: Pearson moved positive .findings on Article 4.2a,b,and c. Yuhasz seconded the motion. Gordon asked why staff had given a positive recommendation. Smith responded that the criteria for water and wastewater treatment for I-1 differed from 0-I in that it allowed for development on well and septic tank. VOTE: Unanimous. MOTION: Pearson moved approval of the rezoning. Walters seconded the motion. VOTE: In favor (5) - Pearson, Walters,Yuhasz, Shanklin, Kramer Opposed (2) - Gordon Pilkey Gordon noted that the ordinance needed bo be revised to address industrial parks and to streamline the ordinance. She noted staff did a good job of applying the Ordinance and reviewing precedents in this case. Yuhasz felt that the planned development could not be used for industrial development as there are too many unknowns. Agenda Item #7c: ..:Z-9-85 JAMES L. FRERLAND Yuhasz indicated he would be abstaining on this item due to conflict of interest. MOTION: Walters moved positive findings on Article 20 Pilkey seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Yuhasz abstaining MOTION: Pearson moved approval of 4.2.e Kramer seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Yuhasz abstaining The Board discussed item 4.2.b Smith clarified that the Town staff had informed her that the letter regarding water and sewer was not issued for the 11 project in question, but was issued in response to a request for a single mobile home on the property. Pearson noted there were pressure problems but services would eventually be available to the site. MOTION: Pearson moved positive findings on 4.2b Shanklin seconded the motion. Walters noted Horace Johnson's comments regarding the pressure problem. Pearson responded that the Town and developers would abide by whatever the engineer stipulates and if earlier development was desired, the developer would have to pprovide the solution. Gordon felt there was no assurance. Pearson disagreed noting there may be problems to correct and Town requirements to be met, but that the lines must be upgraded for development to occur or else the land would remain undeveloped. Gordon asked if the applicability of the letter was cited at public hearing. Smith responded it was noted in the findings submitted by the staff. VOTE: In favor: (2) Pearson, Shanklin Opposed: (4) Gordon, Pilkey, Walters, Kramer Abstention: Yuhasz. The Board discussed item 4.2.c. Pilkey questioned the classification of the road. Smith read the definition of a collector and sub-collector.. Pearson noted that though by definition it was a sub collector on the basis of traffic, it might serve more than 100 units and, therfore, be considered a collector road. Gordon asked if evidence on this matter had been presented at public hearing. Pearson responded maps were displayed at public hearing. There was Board consensus to proceed given a previous negative finding. MOTION: Pilkey moved a negative finding on 4.2c) . Shanklin seconded the motion. VOTE: In favor: (5) Walters, Gordon, Pilkey, Shanklin, Kramer Opposed: Pearson 05E 12 Abstention: Yuhasz Shanklin asked if the Board could indicate a positive finding if developed at R-2. Collins responded the same criteria would be applied. MOTION: Shanklin moved denial of the request. Walters seconded the motion. VOTE: In favor: (5) Gordon, Pilkey, Walters, Kramer,Shanklin Opposed: Pearson Abstention: Yuhasz Those interested in item 7e2 asked if the Board would consider it this evening. The Board indicated it would be considered first under the amendments if time permitted. Agenda Item #7d: WEST TEN MOBILE PARK Gordon introduced the item. MOTION: Kramer moved positive findings on 8.6.1-3 Pilkey seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous. • MOTION: Pearson moved positive findings on all items covered from page 083-094 of the public hearing agenda from 8.6 a) 4 through 6.23 d) . Walters seconded the motion. Kramer inquired why item 20.3.2d) was not marked. Collins responded the requirement was not applicable to the project as no zoning change, except to planned development was requested. VOTE: Unanimous Smith addressed items 6.23 e) and f) . She noted that under the planned development process submittals may be considered which satisfy the intent of the Ordinance to a comparable degree with a submittal meeting the letter of the Ordinance. She noted that staff recently encountered technical difficulties with the 1/2" infiltration standard and that the stormwater management plan submitted by the applicant was a comparable solution and met the intent of the ordinance. 0 .J _J v ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date July 1, 1985 Action Benda Item # 8 SUBJECT: PD-3-85 WEST TEN MOBILE PARK DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes X _ No Attachment(s) Information Contact: SUSAN SMITH See May 28, 1985 PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA DRAFT 5/28/85 PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES MATERIALS SUBMITTED 5/28/85 PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT 6/17/85 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 PURPOSE: To consider a proposed Planned Development-Housing/Special Use Permit (R-1) application for Darrell Garrett and Waylon McFarland, presented at public hearing on May 28, 1985. To receive the Planning Board recommendation of June 17, 1985. NEED: The applicants, Waylon McFarland and Darrell W. Garrett have requested a Planned Development-Housing (PD-H-R-1) designation for 37 acres of land located on NC 10 (SR 1144) in Cheeks Township. The purpose of this request is to permit construction of a 40 unit mobile-home park. The property in question is known as Lot 55 of Tax Map 28 in Cheeks Township. The property is located within an area designated Twenty Year Transition and Commercial-Industrial Transition on the Orange County Land Use Plan. That designation permits single-family residential housing. The present zoning classification of the property is Residential-1 and Protected Watershed-II. The requested designation is PD-H- R-1. Certain development standards must be met and a Special Use Permit must be obtained for the development to proceed. IMPACT: Approval of the request would allow a 40-unit mobile home park to be constructed on the site. 06C RECOMMENDATION: Article 8.2.2 states that where a preponderance of evidence indicates compliance with the general standards, specific rules governing the specific use, and that the use complies with all required regulations and standards, the application must be approved unless it is found, in some specific manner, that: 1. The use will not promote the public health, safety and general welfare if located where proposed and developed and operated according to the plan as submitted; 2. The use will not maintain or enhance the value of contigous property; 3. The use is not in compliance with the general plans for the physical development of the county as embodied in these regulations or in the Comprehensive Plan, or portion thereof, adopted by the Orange County Board of Commissioners. The burden of proving one or more of the above findings is on those opposing the application. The proof must also be in the form of competent material . and substantial evidence. No information has been received which would establish grounds for making one or more of the above findings. The Planning Board has reviewed the application, the site plan and all supporting documentation and has found that the applicant does comply with the general standards, specific rules, and required regulations. The Planning Board recommends approval of the request. The Planning Board does, however, recommend the attachment of conditions to the approval which are specified in the abstract and which are as follows: RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The grantee of this Special Use Permit shall post with Orange County, in a form acceptable to the County Attorney, a bond or letter of credit in an amount equal to the cost of all public improvements plus 10%. The amount shall be determined on the basis of fully executed construction contracts or certification by a registered engineer employed by the grantee of this Special Use Permit. Security for construction of the improvements in this project may follow phasing in the project. Specifically, as improvements are completed in each phase a corresponding amount of money may be released from the security 061 PD-3-85 WEST TEN MOBILE PARE 3 s impro snegotiated vetnte. 2. Security shall be provided for the grading, paving and stabili- zation of all cleared areas, streets and other vehicular travelways; sidewalks and other pedestrian walkways; erection of street signs; utility installation and hookups; recreational facilities; landscaping and mulching around all mobile home units. 3. All necessary easements to permit utility (electricity, tele- phone and cable television by any cable television provider franchised by Orange County to serve this development) installation, servicing and hookups to the development and to each unit within the development shall be provided at no cost to the utility provider. 4. Roads, parking areas, walkways, street signs, utilities, recreation facilities and sites, landscaping and mulching around units shall be maintained as constructed. All such improvements and facilities shall further be maintained and operated in a safe manner. S . The grantee shall promulgate rules and regulations governing tenancy in the development which shall restrict accumulation of trash and rubbish outside of the mobile home units, shall restrict storage of goods outside of mobile homes and which shall further prohibit the storage of junked or unregistered motor vehicles. The grantee shall file with the Orange County Planning Department a copy of the rules and regulations •promulgated under this condition and maintain an up-to-date copy of the rules and regulations in the Orange County Planning Department. 6. A single entranceway shall be provided. The entrance shall be located and designed according to Department of Transportation recommended road connection standards. 7. All roads within the mobile home park shall be hard surfaced in compliance with NC DOT Subdivision Roads Minimum Construction Standards (p.19 E Pavement Design) . 8. All roads will be named and the names not duplicate any other names within Orange County. Road name signs to Orange County . standards shall be erected at all intersections. 9. Removal of snow and ice from the roads in the development and the sidewalks within the development shall be the responsibil- ity of the grantee. Such removal shall be completed promptly. 10. There shall be at least 2 parking spaces per mobile home unit in the development. 082 PD-3-85 WEST TEN MOBILE PARK 4 11. Mailboxes which are clustered shall be provided close to each entrance, but far enough into the development to prevent traffic problems on West Ten Road. A pull-off shall be provided and the mailboxes set back off the main entrance roads. The entrance roads and pull-offs shall be of sufficient width to allow three or four cars to stop and get mail while others continue to pass. The mailboxes shall not be located in a place that would require cars to cross traffic, make unnatural turns or go against the flow of traffic. Cluster mailboxes shall be located outside of sight triangles for entranceways. 12. Prior to the initiation of construction activity, final approval by the Orange County Health Department of the well and septic systems must be obtained. 13. The recreation areas shall be constructed as provided in the application and submitted site plan. The pedestrian paths and nature trail serving the individual units and the recreation areas shall be a minimum of 72" wide and be composed of surface materials recommended by the Orange County Recreation Department. A pedestrian crossing shall be provided to the nature trail at the north-east corner of the residential cluster. 14. That all signs be erected in compliance with Article 9 Signs following issuance of a building permit and prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any unit. No sign may be erected within the sight triangles for the entranceways to the development. 15. Grading on the site shall be kept to a minimum. In lieu of planted landscaping, existing vegetation shall be maintained between units. 16. All plans for drainage, soil erosion and sedimentation control shall be reviewed and approved by Orange County. In addition, Orange County shall inspect the installation of control devices and the on-going work for the total project. The project shall at all times meet the requirements of the Orange County Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance. 17. The project must remain in unitary ownership and no lots can be sold to individuals. 18. A unit numbering system and corresponding unit location shall be filed with the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permit. This system shall be used in obtaining and issuing any building permit. Any change in the unit • 06L' PD-3-85 WEST TEN MOBILE PARR 5 numbering system must be filed with the Orange County Planning Department. 19. A final boundary survey of the Planned Development and improvements shall be recorded by the developer. 20. The final site plan and narrative of the project incorporating all changes, deletions and additions through the final approval of the project are incorporated herein and made a part of this Planned Development Special Use Permit. A copy of the final site plan and narrative are on file with the Orange County Planning Department. Grading and building permits, upon application, will be issued after approval and recordation of the Special Use Permit. 21. The development shall be built and operated according to the site plan and written narrative supplied by the developer and in compliance with the above conditions. tt) t•s • 0 cc . - -C . w • 4-1 2 . . a) in o 06 4 in _a tu 4a al C 0 0 0 0 U) 2 0 1 U) • -- .c v - I 2 • __ 4., C Z I 1 2 1 2I a) - 2 33 vow. 4.• 0- in 0 In U) UI O ITI c..) 0 0 4) 0 al 4.0 tri (1) 4) - C 0 , 7- 3-1 Ti 3.-1 (0 0 L. 0 .0 0 C ' (0 - I- • U in V) vi -5 •I 1 1 :1 1 C 4) - (/) c 0 In -- a a) • ca at 4.1 • • . . -0 = 0. 0 .-.. E c 11•■• E In c) 0-1 in • .-- 0 4) -a 0 c0 U. C 4) (0 t) (0 L. ....... 4.4 .-. , (0 (11 0 • L.. in U cm 7 "0 LA 0 U C 0 .... (IC 0) C 7 C 0 4-1 0 0.- 0 in 0 cr a) ..- tit a) IA >. L. 41 ...- 4.. 1:1 1. 4- U) I.) C il... C. . 4 C • . 0) L„ .... 0 -• - - - . (n •-• C C 113 ILI CI .0 0 4-' In 1"•• .44 • E L. a) (0 . 0 L. In C Ut 0 : -C 0 C 0- a) .0 m < 0 c o .-. CC • 0.. 0. 10 < 1.1 CO U 1"." •-• 0 c 'CI " .. O (0 U IL- 4-' • 0 . a -0 4) 0 0. ul mi -C 4) In 1.• 0 (Ø4.J C : - 4-1 01 o 44 - 101 CO 4.1 010 Lt.. -- •-• M •1- 4.4 (.0 U c • L. CO • < In C - L. III I'•• 0 0 : 4../ 01 ••. 1- '13 I3 0 -- 2 'V 44 'V 0 0..0 4..) , 4) In 0 4J '0 0 • • C - C 0 o - 0.- m . 0 - a) t- 0 • - 0 2 • c4 a) cc - 11..... 44 in . In .- U - -0 3 0 > UI 2 eer 1 u- U 0.••• a •-. -0 Z U 0 us •0 in > 4/ C . < < CI- C - c 4.4 I- O 13 "13 .0 C • 0 •-• c•II • Q., ID U C O. -I U a) 1... 4) s... 4.1 4I% .... C 0 O. 4.1 0. 11.1 a) .0 4-1 < LI. O. 4.1 • 0 0) ..." C.'. C U) 0) 0).-- = • 4.1 > •-• in 0 0 Ck.... 4. C -0 0 •••• a. 6 i- _C 1 '- - ...., C z- . -0 .4., 0 0 1- 0. 4) • C • C 10 - I- 10 O. C C 44- • (wN 44 ut .0 - - • a) 111 2 C3 0 .0 (%) 4.1 L. 4-1 I.., 0. 01 • 0 •-• 10 4:1 .-.. L. .. cl .1-i .... ..... ■-.. I = 2 0 4.1 III 4., • Cls C 01 13 • 4.1 CL ' 00 co 0 4) L c0 _C 0 a) I- 0 m 0 - a m - •- 0. 2). .s- 0 ,, ..c_ 0.4) CE ,4-0 a..0 0 6 (..) I- 2 tr) I- 0 • •-• 5 a) to t.) • I CO tu r. 14.. as -0 a) 1.• 0 C .o • Ill •-• 4-' 1.1 4-1 .U) = . Z I-, CO II7 = .. O. 0 0 >. *••• ••••• 1 11.1 CU ie.. ....... In IT 4-I 0 r•••• •• 4.1 v.* VI Co 4.11 ..••• .0 UI {n la' CO = C • 0 0 U = Ca) .."' .... • co C 4-1 U) In 1-• In '0 U •-• Ca- 0 C • •"" 0 E - E .cc .1..) C 0 - 0 a) '0 C U M to - a o - 11) CO o c o .- 04 - w 71: • c) < L...... ca _0 4) m 4.) L. L. c u c U -0 44 a) - Ct. I.. 0 ..- .... LI.- 0 ID C C a - 1 . I- a) -0 C • • 0 t:t ..... 0 •-- (0 (0 . U IV 0.-- us -o ...- > .-- cc - U C. 3 3 3 w cz LA.c ill • 0 C C 4) a- a) - 0. 0 .- c 4-$ a) 0 o • 0 w>. 0. I.. 4J 10 0 LO La .= .= -C U.1 CO '14 4.0 (st In vs RI -0 al 4.1 - < 0. 0 E C av Q. cr) In cr) us • = 4.• C - 0) 10 ;;;J) CO C •- in 01.0 U .. 0 ._ a) 0c C4 Lt. I . C .- 0 10 E I. 0 - 0 0- 4_..... o. to e c 4. c L. a. M - 0 U 0 - - c in - • I . ct) o U - a) or co al- . v) 2 = a) 4-1 O. 4. 0 C ••• UI 7..; co 1 (.1 = cD • O. s- 41 C) > • 4- CI. U) til = - -. U 13 .... 0 0 • CO C3..... 0 (1) ILI 3.- 3- 0 -c.3 21 o 21 00 2121 0 2 i a 1- •-- -a 1.0.,- ..T, hi C 41 0 = 2 1 I : 2 < .0 C • 3 0 -0 • 0 C 4-1 `...' Ck - , .... i...) 0 10 UI -0 C 0) N 0 •- 3 cG U. ' ! - U. - CC.. 4.1 C • .0 44 0 4.1 1 ....1 .--. c 11) 0 > "0 C 10 C..) C •-• .0 C COM 4.1 0 U) 0 CI tn 0 I- cc LJJ 0 In GI U) U) 4) 0 UI a) I co a. 4'1 In L. E -0 0 • TO .-- 4) C .- 0 E 2 o >- >- >- >-, • >- w a. a) ct. C - O..-• - .- 01 a) WI 0 z •• C 0 .... •C •. U 0. C S. = .>c I 2 0 •• a) - 3 0 L.• .0 O. 117-- 0 - 5 a •• I )1 4.1 /11 0)4) Cn 4.1 0 44 4-4 < 1- = CL. 2 2 1 14.I 5 1-L.4.1 Cn > C .0 c ul c 4.. •-• 0 Cr = = a - C 4) < 0 0 CD < c.D c 2 E_ 44 o C a C UI•-• it-.40 0 L., LL ...I ILI ( 0 .0 12. *"" I" "-' 0-o .0 Q. cc 4.4 L.) = C 3 .0 4) 4-1 O. L. U) 4-1 0 4-1'V 2 "0 C - U) in ...• (2 > t) ER14) 4) .-- C 0 M 0) 0 -0 0 C 04) 0 -0 (n tn E.) 14- at - . +1 a) tgi, t.) to in - ge in •-• C CI) UI U C = - 0 I- (U 4/1 ...0 4) 0. TO .0 ..- CO 0. 10 10 VI 4.1 • a) .cC C L- 4) (..) 4-1 4-1 I- 0 0 M 4-1 m c E- in..-... C 4- • 0 L. UI.... C.1 0 = 0 • tn 0 J.1 •-• .- •-• 0 0- C N 0 UI (0 < Ot t) - t.) • C 4•1 4-.- a) 41 0 .-- I. 3 U 0.....- ... - UI C ••" ....1 12 0 4) (U UI 0 On C "0 > •••• 0) 0 t- 4.1 ••• 4.J 0 ,. .. 4-1 U 0 4.1 TI .-- 4.1 a. 4-' 0 10 - 0) C C -0 1. a. 4) (11 vi I- - 0 - 10 •-• UI 4- (0 3 U ka- 0. 4) 11/ C < < 4-1 3 0 i- 0 1- 'cn TI 'VW 1"..10 4-9 4.1 TI 0 4) 4) C C 4- 3 - E 0 = •- 4.1 --- 4/) E •-• C "CI O.4./ .- M 0) n1 0 Os in 4)4- E r% 2 .- U U) E 03 0 0. U Ce. 4.1 .c) tn (0 03 0 T. 1.- 0 .0 4.. -C 0 4) .0 0 u) 0 21 0 O. 4) "0 1-CL).....0 14". A>. 1 0) 4-, 0. 0.C - 4-a 0 CO C 7 •-• 0 i- : U .0 0 •-- 0 4-1 1 C 4..1 ,..0 4.1 ..- I.. C ‹C 1/1 a) Z C ..0 '0 • (s) in .- 0. •• to 10 4./ "0 in 4-1 44 . CU ' ••■. CT M 4.4 0 c0 6 0 0 C .0 : X -01 s- 1., - 4.11 C a) •••• to) .•••••...... (IF 4-J 4)i C 4- 1.- 0 0 - 0 0 in 11) 3.00 0 4-1 E 4-1 -"CI in 12 L. 0 Cl) C C3 I- 0 0..- • UI s-, > • 0 (7)4.1 , • L. a. L. 4- 411 ........... L. 1- 0) 2 •-• - 01 4..i ..- ' I 111 01 ••• 1- "13 •- "0 0 0 <• -13 1.. - IOU) et . 7 44 C 4- mi al . >.- O..> 4.1 TO C 1- 44 ..- U •-• 0) 33 0 • 0.1 .-- 0 U C 4.1 4) 1... C 10 C In C. (IC 4) > .0 IS 3 II- 1/40 ' 4) 0 -0 00 : c1- = .- /4- '10 (0 1033 > - 0..- 4-1 0 00. • 14 - - C .-- - . 0 .0.ut . 0 0 C a 1.) CC in 0 •• in 12 0 c4 - 00 -- > 0 4-4 3 0.. 0 tO 10 (IC: a) O. 0 - 01 (0 1-5, a no 4.1 • ...-1 4.■ C ..-. ..... _0 4) cry U Q. 1- 44 C I.. (0 C ...0 C 0 L.•.- •••-• " M U.) C < O.O.- a) .- 0 4.1 C) (0 4-1 go a) 0 3 --, ...- -0 .0 ....1 m - -2 0. .-.. 0..- L. 44 U C C 4- 0 4) T.7 c I u) 1- 7 0 T0 0 X 0 0 1- C --- 4-1 0 - -- e L) - co .,. 2 LU -1 E 0 al 44 - vl > i- -0 ..0 t- in U 13 CO 4-1 c.) . .-- 0 0 - (U cC 1- • 00CC • •.- • • • • a. tn ti- ._t ..a <ac Oi co 4-13 •- RI co in 2 •-• CJ on , . . . in cC n c 2 065 0 . ! { 21 21 21 21 21 1 1 2 a c...1 N in N N N ,ba. } >- >- >- >- >- >. T Q2 I . { I I I • { I 1 CG fa Q Z m W, N • - C L dd 0 0 • -0 C O) N • 0) • .0 4) 3 _O. . C 4.+ f0 . C CO (0 3 0) •'•• N .0 L. >. 03 'R L > O N U C C Z O • L., a f0 L d' N L. 0.•-1 Z. 0) (1) 0 -c •- C(al +' d.) 0 0 0 N 4-' 44 •- C al .. 1-• •C) 0) 0) . L ... 0 •_. 0 01 •- C in N 1-r •v O N LL O N C 4.+ 01 , a N 0 0 ... . 'O N L f0 0 < .0 C 01 ++ - .0- N C) 0) y0 L • 0. +r to - 44 +) U C)) N - _- in C 0Lt. E C L. 4..., - G. NN C f0 0 O r L 0) a0i C 0 0 0 CA 0 O C 44 0) 0..0 in 0 +3 4- C 0 L > 0 N G CO C '•p .- "0 0 .N C - 3 U)u C fv 0) > 0 ... ) 0 it.0) .Q 0 0 1- - 3 0 +.r p p V v1 0 C C ;_' s0,. V RI N 0. O) N , a Al E - O • -• a C .v ..CC - .- s0.. ai 49 0 .0 C 0 C. •- p a cn z L. 3 4- '0 >. 4�- 'C G f0 0 E 0. .0 0•V N t0 U f(D C 4. IA Q) (CO V 00 0 0) 0 0 CO C 0 Q 4.1 L C C CA ' N L 40•- 'C) 0 L... U N 0. - N 0) N in C. 0 +.4 • •00 C lO. 0) d.) 0) N 0 .. 04.. N > 0 N - � .1.1.r 0 U fl 0. 0 01 > .. - 0). . 0 03 ."' 044 U C A C L 4' W C. 1- in < N -0 U f- a. N 2 N < 01 f- 0 C. th ■ • • (I) LA .a 2 , c 2 0 O O O O ' O 0 O O C 0 - 2 21 21 : 21 : 21 : 21•of� 1 I I { C.) LC L11 v N N N O N N N> H N r N N} so n 2 )... 7- 7- . Z.! >. 2 = z xI XI • f XI X XI .X I X l : i a a. .ce 2 G I U ce 1 i.( "C L 0 _ L G L N 0 1. 0 0 F 0.O O C 0 O +.► N C 40 OI d 4- in L O c< t. 43 .0 N N 0.0 _0 •-•a 0) 0) fJ O (A 0 O 0 .0 U 4.+ 0 CAN �' N O .0 3 'L J a1 c E 0 4-' 00 0 • C C O 01 0 ++ a.f 0 co ' a. C.0) 0 •0 U 0 E 0 •- 0) c. 0 0 0. ate.) VI O O fr L IF 0 4.. .. L y) ` C O m L L C LO�-+ N O1 0 (0 7 Si SI N +-' 0) 10 RI N N N 0 0) (0 O i-) °b • .`a.)11'C) C O. 0) ..+ 0 N •(7 (n .0 L- ++ X 0 L .0 IL. iQ 0 • .0 01 U L O) 0) 44 0) I CO CO C +w N N C E 0) O p C O _> > N 1/1 O 7 O o i N 0 f0- C (4 r 0 4- - 0 (0 in 4J N 4- .0 '0 44 LI N 2 _ • 'O C 0) 4 Q)0 0 v.. (0 L �-0 in 0 0 0 ++ f0 (0 N E Q 0 0 0 0 .0 • 0 ++ +•f 0 0) 0 . c s 1 n +.1 C U E `) N L i+ N N C U) 01 (0 O N C 0 .0 - N O • CC c �+ C O. C N O Cl'- C) C a.) O) O Si E C- (O c.a GO O N O JJ N (0 0 -- C t0 C 0 - 0) ' 0 0 0.. f0 0. a, - U (0 E •- 0 J.) > (0 01 0 0 N C N +J N O 0. >. in u +.( 11 +.( 0) ..c U 4J L a) 0 0 - N co in (o 0- N N 0) 1-4 I Ld C (0 O 00 -.6 C - (0 4.1 0) N 0) E O. 0) > 0 a 0 > C.(i) 0 0) C -1 (0 U N U C 0 - U L - +.+ 0 L L U in U 0 0 > E 'U 4- 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 • • 0 O c • • X C C L U 0) U- U L. 0) (0 C 0 ...) Q. ...I N +•+ N -1 O'O W - 0 0. in in <'0 (0 LU 0.•0 2 0 < V K L • . .•< 0 -#' 111 ■D 1'•• CO ON •f l - CV I 06C . . in Ce . UJ 2 . 0 . _ tit 21 =1 21 21 = crl .... = • I I I I . I I = 0 tn in 0 0 . in C.3 0 0) 4.1 0) 0 • T-1 T-1 >••1 T.I Lt. I . ' : - I • I ci:la , • . • tan It. . •-• 1 U1 — 4) 0 I- - ••••• ttl C .L.t . •.- "0 CO 0 ,... C "0 L- W .- 0 to ... i•J ' ce I- . . L. • I.) 0 -0 • 4) 0 Co . . cif • 1"3 0 1" • 4-I 0 >. Li ... ..... 0 4-■ .-- 0 -0 C 0- : c 0 ..... .1.1 in M 4-# 4.1 4) • . . C .... 1... 0) 0 0 E 0. 0.-- • c." .0 •— .0 .....d 0 U) in C M -N. 0 0 • . tt7 NS.. I- C) ). 2 I.) 4.1 0. u.I C L. • 0. . 2 4) 4)•-• RI • 0. 0 ..., 0 3 4.0 ..J > U.S LU 0..•... C > U.S . S . 0 . . CI . U.S . . = z 1 < 0 0 0 0 0 ....1 =1 =1 = 2 1 =1 Ca I I "... ce 1 2 44 C) 0 • tta in in to — co I- to 0 0 0 0 0 I 4C 0 = 2 T-1 T.1 >••1 >I }-1 1 -.I — •44 2 I I I I I Lit .4 1 I cd ck. 0 LL.. . U, C 4e) I ) .- ^ 0 1 cd ›- 0. 0 •-- Csi < - L. ••• ea • CU .... (0 0 c." 4-• 4-1.-m• .' 1 = .0 (0 — la _..1 IV in t- it) in - en 0 •la Ul .".• ••• t.) C..) #4 0 0 .-- a.I in 4-, .- Cl — a) 0 0..en a) co 4., .... 0 a '4-. . C CO a. IC 6 -- U. E -- - 01 41 < in . — C., 0 4-; •-• E c 0 fil 1,.. CX16 .... ..0 1- 00 U.S ••••' a) 0 C t- I- 0 -. .-- 0.. )I 0 -C 4-1 0 0 4- ,- U) i4 .- 0 0 N 9- .0 0 4) ..- -0 • itt 4a 1.1... 1 o CSI ..0 CO 0 '0 •••• 1.. • 3 0 00 1.••• 0 ...1' 4•A 4,- •-■ ••• 0U- ftf UI ‘1) 0 4-1 .--' •la 1 U.1 C 0 •••• "0 0 0. •••• 4-1 0 n) .""'" 1.• 0000. Les- t, ci t.) 0 0 0 01 ID 0 in M — I— o1 4..* ••■• 4.$ 1/1 in 0 0 10 ce LI L.. 1.. tl) RI a) M -c S-- C -,--- • .---. .--- < Co I < 0 -0 0 -10 ..0 I- al M m _0 7.3. "0 ) o Cr) i • .0 C 4.1 o 0. C 067 z c W I I � � 2 .... 4.1 0 ti Cn N ,.., 'O N >- • � in - 0Li •N- Z V � I � > 40U 1 O. 0 c d0 +�' 4 m 0) >. a) in a 0 C ) O CC • .O 0 O •-- Cc •- C • - ca.V • L L. L .N L at O.- m V N C N O a+ C V E u () 0)4- '0 41 O• O .0 is a) al •..• V 3OQ'4L i' °'- F- t. m Cr c U E I- • 0 c m .0 - 4- 0. C C. •'-' C in m L .0 L '0 • • E C U ,•.i O >. O -0 a. • O. 0 C) U ++ 0 C S. • N 0-? N .0 r C C - O a N W a) C >• N m 0).-• •0 Lj .0 0) C 3 .- L 0) C ••.' 4.1 •.0 O .0 .0 a) .0 4. C a) 3 •- 0) N u. 0 = E '0 '0 •G N U m --N U O > • U al > N O .0 U•- 0 m V O 0 C 4- T. C 0) C 0) 44 +' ' 0 N ._ 4J.-. U N s- 0 0 U U >. 0) 4- ID 'O- O . i - -p 0 .•• ,- 0 0 4' +' - '0 N 44 -0 m -a a) • .a L.RI 0 L 0 m O_ N C. m •- 0 > C C 4-' N U1 •)J +•' •- a) CL. •-• 0 O. N O • • > > L L O O y L m C-I-' 0 u _ xmm . LCo � 0O O C n +' 0 0) L. IV .-• .30 O . 0 0 c 0) a) -O -a O. O. • C U N O. .0 -).- .0 .0 C d - O a) O a) •- N � L ^ m > •F' .0 m )- > m 0) t.) O C L C a a) U .0 • Cl 4.. G U c 0 C•- C .- ••- '0 C - +_+.= 0 A C N 'D A O N m U m L O A 4- I. m �✓ N .0 .- ^ N C-0 - L O L 4.0•- O. 0 4- 0 0 in 'O N E •- . .- ac 0 -0 O- a° L O'C .- d U te m O 4•• C Q i >. a) .0 >•^ a) .- L L N C cc U R CO > ' N L .)•• .0 U 4 4 0 •--) 0 a) O. a) N U •0 a) O 0- >• Li C 0 c •N m c O E O.++ )- '0 N L .- f0 N 'O 0) 0 0 0 4.' 0 .0 L C '- C U) G > N 0. U O a) +J O >•a.• O a) O. m J.• a) a.• .-+ 0) L C L E 0. C-0 C U +.' C U .A m V > - U N E •- •— a) a) m O w O U 0 N m�C 0) 01 a) E O e a) N iJ > •••' U 0) ^ a) C O 0'O -• N = t- •- 0 CT +.s $)4- N•- •'•' O. • 0 C O 0) C• .0 E 0 U U) C 0) >- 0 ••' -Q C "C 0 C•- in C N M.- C d.• .- t1 0) U C O 10 .O N C .O a C L m a'v m i.+ C N .0 C C. .. U L E ,- .O m 0.'0 L 0 1. •O 0 0) N U1 0 0 C 0 E > 44 > ... +.4 d i•' a.) L +' ..- N 0 m 1.0 4., 4.' 0) 44... 'O O LJ O. C). ++ N O N •- E )- - 0 O O. 0) U a'.- a 0) C m c) r U , O. In ✓ ,v t 13- 'C 0 .0 • O - cc tt. W O.G F..1N C .)-%O to -0 - C 3• . N Cc to 0 I • t•.) CC C N) N N N Q X I X I X I W J = • ial C a) U Ct CC i.• .N- m.U V U U - a0.• .0 m a) C £41 L ..- t-• 0 0 0 1-- 1.1.- I-- .. •• 4- t0 4- 'O N V/ i.• CI Q4.. L. 0? 0 Ct V N N C >...• y >+ 'J Q) 4.• c i 0 •OD 0 3 Ort •u m +.' -v I U._ .-- C O 4) 0 - C W 44)) O N U))C • O d U, L a 4- -C •- m - L a)-a a7 N 'C d '- "al t0 .4./ 0 d 4.1 • a .0 a) "0 0) m L -0 N '• cv eV m 3 3 'o C O ++ 0 co CQ G 4 ro N • O N a.' ' u N ) 'U N U � 0 O N•- V •p L.= • t. C 1 C C U co 4- . m U -- — Z in Z u.. a' = F.. '0 + < C < _ � W - .0 U • rr a • N CC to W L O • O '0 t0 .-- E N > U us .0 0 0 0 0 C 't7 Cs 0 0 I I I I I .r to C C5 -a N VI N N V' V1 C E C © C >- >- }I a) >- a - •0: s - m .t0 1 C m t% - N o L O +1 +-1 C 0..- W z 0 •- L - - O C u1 W U I- L) © U1 .0 LJ O W V H 3 4.1 C L. U C U > C W O +.1 t0 •Z 0 La. .- y C 0 .O .- (0 ' t+. L 0 (0- t0 1.1 0{•0 p t.1 0 I- -0 0) C U W us E 4 O C • 0 U E -0 C C O C O COi O. 0) (0 O U C .0 O 'O 4•1 4.+ u) to U+ �.1 0 ro to 3 y. C > 0 aU) 4.'.1 0 L.( . c - 0 0 1- us vl U I- O . 0 .- ro C..- U W 0 .0 "0 4-1 -0 v = � • -0 •1•4•••• 0 • . 0 t0 ..1 a) L - E 0. W W O1- a=) a) 0. to O. W O .0 •0 "0 rn I- 4 _+- N 0. O .- 10 u1 ( C U U C0 us 2 0 - C .- •� . W W L= LAJ W �~ U M LA 'U 1>1 L f0 O. Q. a y iC1 W 0' 0.�L as f0 -0 0, 0 am- ut+U W U O O W E 0 a) W z ) 0 O - ea •3 (.0 D = t0 C. )- 4-..- n 0 • .1 CI >• w i : i • o •t9 •- z z z z C0 Cs J C C) C9 Z a) 0) 0) 0) 0) W 0 d z = >- XI }I }I X I �a 0 d VI> , a1 . U. O. d 0. W ' N W c ' 0) 0 (0 0) 0 0 W 1-0 a) > ) < U. U 0d 0) •- 0 -4- O uW) C .- I. •p 4- U)'O VI •-•- 0. 0 CO .0 4.' G 0.t0 4•1 •- 0) V) 0 O) W - 0 .0 W 0 0..0 I- t0 CC Q. L 0 4-1 VI C a1 N CO 0 "s cn .0 < • tO.0 < tS 0 a) t0 C .- U C L Q 0. a L u 0 +•1 01 a) •-• •C 0 tO a) _a O.0. - < W 3 C L 4- 1,.1 ++ 4- L. +1 C +W.1 L U 4.1 X) L`• +W1 U) I >. C o) 'o C L- 0. O u -C E E c .0 0 v L) R u)•- a) 0 0) 0 L C ++ 0-0 0 W 3 *0 w U U W 0.- .0 C 4- E U 0 4) C 0 0 1- a1 >,-W a ''.' E 1- oL m .0a UE0.� C1a. (n C U.. u u u 3 0 0 'C 00 -0 "C I O C - t0 O•i t ••.• G.) W • .0 •- C 0 +1 C W +•1 10 L 4.).0 w -CI .0 a to to CO _ I co.. m a C u) u1 +1 U - 0 - - E C. >+ A C W N N N L C O.V) O 01 O.>.. 0 (0 t) 1- ++ C •- 4- j • • N W tO 0 W X C -C E 10 W tO •- O CO OD 1 -?4- C r' J UJ tO 0 1J VNI 4- = 3 i.' CO co 1+ P. +1 W C r•. 11 -.4•- to U W u) .-..i.1 C u1 E W 10 >• - .0 >. U - 0 '0 - U 0.0 W w W w W O 0 E• a) +1 = 0 4.1 O. .0 W - W +1 J _1 E L 4 "0 N 1- •-•N . N L N - 0 N 3 C.0 N E C U U U U a • W • W . 1- L i,/ .y .-- C a t M O. 0 0 M O. ( 0 0. M - >..- rei C C 4-1 I- - 1.1 0 0- U • 0 t0 • O L • >. t0 • a) .0 t0 C~C L tL L•- W O C O L .0 = C] L tO L >• © C .0 W 0 E C< < d < i+ L ty ... 1'4 0-1J .- N 0- N W .0 N (0 10.0 N 01 (0 O. cc W - O6S Cn O O Z C O MI N =� zl O .- C.) N N in O1 N L• CL UR) } } >- 2 . >. N U O N U �N 0) cecl I 4.• IC) 0 'N O a) ro O 0 a1 44' 0) 0. s 01 U.i C U L. C "C3 4.1- 0 10 44 0 N -0 .0 0O ) 0 am 0 N L _ U vZ Chi. 00) 0 cc E C a) m to O C0 -4- m W. 0 0 c. ` 10 0 >0 •C h- (00 44 0. N ,i ° .0 a) •- N 4-1 3 C �J N C E N dJ +1 U 4- .- 4' CO- N C0 N •- fl O - •4i-0 00 A -,> .• 0 E O0. N 4- o a) 'o •- . y. r0 4- N S >.. L C.) 1') L. 0 3 N -0 `� •V O . L 10 O a) to a) N '- '- 0 • C7) C Q _ - `.+ N L .O O.. a) • C 0 0 >> >- 0 C L.. - C 10 L- 0. 3 a) L. +•1 O. a) aJ 4- 4 0 '0 0 - 0 • -J 1✓ 0 LO ....- 1-- 4.1 tol -0 F- U C 104 ..••. C N C CT 0 N C .. N t0 d O ++ 0....E U -04 a) 0 a) L-•U a) .0 C73•t.L L > N N 0 ,.-. a) C 10 4...+ -0 C . C C •- O a) 0 O 4- .0 00 >�. C0 - N '0 00+ L L 4- '° - i'1 O C7) a1 a) C O N N O .. 0. -0 Co 0 3 0 C > N •- 0 0 N +J �'1 N • a) • N 0 > N C 0. L CO a) E C 00 -fl 0 10 a).- U.0 N U a) 0) C .IZ N•.. co O - • L. 0 0 C C) 0) 1- Qt >. E a1 o • C V) al .- m C6.- 0 •0 •0 C 0003N iJ U L a c •r > +1 .1.) L C •.- > L c N 0) C 4) 10 ce C0 Q 01 C - m Q) N 4.1 L •-1 .- O U E .1.+ N •- N '0 N •- 41 CO) w vs L d C aJ.-. ) 044 N U C E -moo U 0 0 a) 0 - N t0 0) X .- -o N •- _ 0) '0 '.r- y -o .0 +1 444 0 >. 0 ... .. .. N U t- > - 0 4.1 O .0 N 0.-7' >. C a) 10 0 0 O E C L- 10 31.1 t1J is CZ' N U N (0 < -V N - - -) C N C0 to N M 0)4- O. . 0 .1 C -C^J • Z• W :0 0 0 0 - s < eC• 1 1 Z .0 c 0 a) a) a) . N N N � � 1 Xl IC xl s < CO.) • La . 4 ++ O. In L 1 C 44 0 U. 4-3 CO. 1.+ C L .- 0 O L- C 0 0 0 0 .0 N 0. 4J 44 N +1 0 0 0 L- 044 0 44 N 0 N CC¢ • 4+ t J+ O +J 0 U N b N 0) C -- C CO C. 10 +J .- 0 > N C in > U C 0 .- a) a) • - 0. 01 0 L- N. L C O L- 10 00 •- N 4- C Z 0 3 E > N L N Q 0) '0 0 +1 L 14 a) E X 'O N .Q iJ a) a) a) 4.4 C N L E•- 0 1.+ N 0 a) E '0 10 3.L C) L 'C ... dJ E a) 0 N +1 N 0) L Q .- On til+ U O.O '0 •. C N C .E U .0 L. 4) N •-a 0 0 0) E a) 0 L. N • + +4 O L- 0 0 0 0) 2) 02 (0 .0 4-4- ..o U C '0 E C7 '0 0 N C 0 3 U U "0 N N C +-+ N Q O a t. 0 0 t0 0 • '0 0) U - '0 '0 a) O U.- 4. L C)..0 0 N WI- C.) 1- C iJ U •-• C 'O C '0 '0 a) C 0 •- .D 4.1 Li) a) N .- 0..•-• a) 0 4- Lt 00 1J - 7 T7 I C '0 '0 C 4.1 10 0 a. _2) .0 2) 4- 4J "CI 4- .44- (0 CO - .0 C). 0 +1 C C C 2) •- .0 N tin 0 E U - N U 03 in c al aJ C0 L . 0 L- •1-1 •-- 0.4- 3 O O - -O N 44 13 • ) a .• 0 0 C0 0 00 +144 •`• 0 3 0 a) N N a) O 0 0 O. .0 - a) N 0 3 N +� T) L.- N 4- a) 0 10 N. a) N�•- N O )- 1- 0) a) a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 a) +J 40 .0 O 44 iJ O 4•1 .- •N T) N 0- 0 0 0 44 4- 0 0 •- •- 44 w 0) C 0 U C N N +'1 40 .3 .. .... (0 . .0 U E C!) ..- C C J C .. C • N .. - N L N 0 0 0 03 1- 0) 3 0 C.) C C) - 0 E N L- L y - N L- C L O U N 0 0 ON Q - 1J E • 0 •U U L • N •-• a .c ". - > _ )- - +1 Q.L E C � '0L U � ++ 0 0) U . '0 C � C 0 .-� L L c.a o N •• 0 v o c - co O X - c o a c co N a a) L- - Q o < m U U E r. E 4- 4J .- N. 3 4- a) .s± - C/) 0.0 .c O N N. E a) N .v . -c c . a) a) Cfl U (�J c -v U E E C U 0 N) 4- L .CC C +-t • o +3 ro ++ O U • C 0 r m V) C L L. C4 4.• o 0 • L ro E m o j ro O. v — 2 z � = >• a = a 0 ! 0 +%) a) I In I to -- •Z - � L - u o at CU) •- +• W • L a a) C to t7. 0 O C U. to - RI a) to +' N m a ' 0 0 o U 4- L O m .0 o > .- ) r CU.>- ^ >- r • 0 a) 0 `r U c a s- • ` a) ++ ++ .x a -o 44 f - cmoao uc +J co • IU49 -aa) o � - ^ u m c+ 0) 0..- C • u co m L. co O W N aE to to 2. O 4) .0 a 0 .... (1) c a) a) •-).0 L a+ N ro N 0- N ro 17 to C a) .0 0 ..0 +' y +d et to '- rn L 0 L to L 4 'C O .0 .0.0 ).• 0 +d O 44'O a a 0) a) a O)+•'+-1 • 111 0 m a +•+ U • u. a C m -- C E- )- O O N >• a • +•r L to O a) O O 44 0 .- a 'O a) a .0 U ro C C 'o T ++ L w to u v q) ro •- L. +r a+•+ a - u C a) c 0 0 13 12 4_ en a) C) a) 'n • • .- m a) 0 E 0 to .- a) +• a C in 4) 'O L .N• ■ +.) a >,. E .-. L. O -u - )- O IV U to v T a) to > C E L 0 t0 t0 ^ m m in VI I- U O a) -0 a-o U 0 6) 0 L to +•t C a+- C •- L 'p U 0 a) a) a) ^ a- a) m 'O 0... . 0 a.-0 to C .c I 0 t0) .- S.. L CO Lfl d.+ 4- C O• in N 4° '1 U 4'4- .t.) O.. ro-7 C CO C .- .0 L C I y 0 L m..0" O 0 .a U C a • a to • 0"" E a. a) Q) O L .a d •- O -O U 141 C •••- "D In a 13 0 L a a) +J .• a) >A+.+ . L .0 44 .- y 0 m CC 0 0 ro •- s U am a) +J > o. O (00 a a) 3 0 'o v) •- ++ 0 to 4•1 a) m O E to • 0 •- N•- to ........ I'.• 4.1 (/) CO L C..-. a) m .0 to N to 2.. +.) 3 a) 'C 'a .0 m m > U a) 0 4- L a a v (1) in C 0 a) 'o 0 +3 N a) 'v a) -v C t- O a) 3 c .0 to C O -- C a N -O C (1) +-+- m 'O '13 a•- U +' ' O a) CO ++ 0 0 0. C 4.• •• CO 0 u m O 0 C m v) L a • .0 .a N •- 0 ..a +• .- o L o > n c -v .- to a a - to + -a .a O +► L • . +•t a CC 4- a•■ cV' U .0 0 m C a) +-1 a. (0 0. N•- C E 3 0 L to 0 of 0 L .- L +d a) C) C •• 0 +) E 3 O _a C >• I- a 7. 0 O 10 a U L O ro • m C O 3 L a) 'O a) L.) U a) +-• C. .a L a. .0 0 +•t U CO .0 0 N a o) a ++ 'O 1 I- ) - � 0 2- C tit T • a) 0) m N a N d 4- a) + O v , a + + U It. ++ a C N a T a C +• 7 to a — C +•t > >- N C a) U) 0 C m to O t0 +-1 N) ro 1- a) ro — a (0...% 1.... (0 ro .- •- a. L a) L U 'O L •..0 U N 0 a.CC 1 O U N^0 L 0 L .00- 0 u.1 al ++ 3 0-- a) •- .- • 'C a. 00 -o•++ +.4 N I-+ ++ •- ++ .0 .- 0 aa to _I a M a MO a m a. a-o ro )- tn U a.4-' E U O. +•• to a •-— .c a 0 () 0 >- 0. 0 a .0 O a a a - U a 4) 0 4- o W Q > v< .- N Lam. < L O. +d a > in < to N ro < a a. O — uJ > - W C) to CI 4.2 141 = Z O Z = Z +a I ( •I i • - I Z O C) N N N sal— to 0 a) a) >(2 4)) >-• Q 1.1) >� A X1 7t� III J 2 © x x 4 w - ) L. L 10 -CU • +J U. to if 0 • 'On. U +J a0) ) U m CU a U CC •- a) 4.. a) a u 44 1 L oG N • ro C a) .0 w > a+ lA L 0)) i.) .■ • 0 = C ? i v_ v O a s.) 0 L H !d r- O a) .0 0 -O 3 • L„ 0 1 0 a) L c ro > a) 0._ � I- f u mo0 - to - 4-1 o ° C Q d.0 >.+d 0 •- 0 L a a) C ro ++ N N (0 -0-a U a) 4- to x N•- C a) a) I- L +J — X 4- > •••• a E s n 10 L C C O a) C • • U S 4- ro ^ — L v N 0 •- a. a 0 4- +) - L = +-I C 0 10 L b -c m (- m I 0 a) m 0 O 4-) 4- 3 E _ to L w CO to 0 • • c) w . 9 c d uO.C2 '- >• 3 44 o N m . c) C 0 ro a. ro -a •- .0 U a U LNEL- • CU) a +-0 m Oro C +.• 1- -•13 04. 1- ta. E +••"0 C a) N 43 • RI U to ••• > CA • U .L L a 4.. ro ro CO to 01 -- to a) N L +d .- L ,u •• 'O .- ••• 'O C a) to 0 a L +s a) 0 '0 a) 'p >^ a • a a) t„) L to (4 V) 'O m C .0 0 C a 4- >. 0 'v +1 +•) U x C U • W +C 0 1- 4-4 L 41 U 4- .0 N t) m N 7. N 0 I. to 0 0 C > N U N L Cl.. 0 on C E m - 0 0 +J ..- m a.— . +-1 a) a 0 al O a O^ ++ m vs 10 0111 a. 0 C .0 L o 'o .- 0 --v a ++ 4- .a .0 4- L .0 N to y +• a E O is il U C L U m -- a) U O •^• O. v I r4 r w C L •- to to u C > a ^ c E m I- .• a ..0 10 at C a 4- 4- u L. 'v .a..-0 41 4-..- C d U o c •- N L ro n a •• - U to to N a) .a E O ro L 4- 0 L m a) — 'v 1 )= 0 to— 'v O u) (0 L C ' U • iL d M E .--. to 0 � W a) a r• L O ro - 7 L in (0 . C O 0.+.• G)+.• m ++'O O 0)++ -3 m .- — a, ro - < L 3 0 10 +d +• to 'c O >-O a 0 U m C to r 1 C c C V C U C a 0 E L o L. E a) u W C C +) ' C m C 10 •> • • L x -q • a --O C I- L. + m 0^ •-- t) 0 C7 N •a C t0 N 0 'O 4- C M tU 0' 0 1.) L It) 0)4- O) m 0 1- L L. C +. a) I •- C m L C m O ---• a C ....- a) m 4- .-. 0 4• C 0 •-• o d amtn L to 0 4_ '- .c 0 E � i am m U m m ._ m (0 44 a. o m > o ^...- +.) • 4a a .0 O tri • 44 4.# 0 7: w NU 'O c c. Cc0 N Z Z= •m 2 2 •Z 0 1' - N 0 N. (A 4- O61 . U. Vf 0 us N N O 4- a 7 CD NC N r rI H 0 •[L• Z +1 U2 O N.0 - ©U. N a ..-mt. N 0 .0 a } -- a) a N L 0 Ul m in "0 aOw F C > 4- E N C OO 0 N 4+ > - O U O. 0 411 - 0 N . U C > C U.- .- C •A L N +1 7 C •- 0 L 0 0-0 0 a) L 4- • () n. 14).0 '0 -" 0 ' >. .a -t) 0) 4.1 N a.. - L 0 • m 0-a N .0 0 "G L-0 .- 0 C t3 i.f -0 4• 0 C C d.1 •• C 0 a)..0 O. co -0 0 C t0 0 U ,H m N O m 0 0 0 ::.1 0 sue.. m a.. V1 C m C C 0 I. 1 0 -0 a0) 9- '0 .-. °'Q1 C a1 E 1- 0 x o d O. c L 00 C 0 •- 0 C N N r- ) u.0 .1 N m > 3 0 .- G 0 C 14 N m m N L u 0 O. 0 N L. -0 ... (0 -O 0•- .O.m VI 4-1 '0 01 a0.1 y m •0 0 0 33 v N (0 )Q O1 01 • N �-1 0 0 C 0 C m N c t0 c m ((00 0 .-. ..... 4.1 ..... L 0 L t0.0 to - N co N 3 .c -3 „a O. 0).- .(.1 L- .J.;r .> •0 0 a) N . .0 C L >• 4.1 01 (0 0 4 m _4- ro • C . u0) 3 C C 3 +0 0 01 C U N 3 c 0 4.1 E C C . m • "t3 L 0 0 a) UI N • 0 C .- C U) -Q -0 c c C 'U- C 3 E a) c: iD (u a) m u) O 7 .- N 0 m •- ty r E c > e .0 3 c 3 L 0 V N =.- .t.1 Q, N C L +� .-. .O CO 44 m c •- O 0 U • to `y 'Q C. U CO +0 4-I N to E ((5 C o {.' m L (00 U01 V ` 'C) a) 4 1 0. L -Q 0 - _ +1vNa) -a w 'N E y,1.- �, a 0. U)- V1 0 o c (�0 U) m 0 N 4- N.Cl..--C X 0. 0 +-1 -0 U 0. 0 0 .- (J sr 0 N U 0 0 1 !+1 =(.J (00 cn� • en m m < � L. 2 q 0.. 1 . 0 0- (0 ((5 i�.1 n. W - - w Q N C3 2 = = a 0 0 Ce 0 0 0 s Z o © -t4)n to > N N 0 I Q r d� 1 x yc I >4 • •-1 ti.1 • W C3- .CC 0 0) 0 a") 0 O L7 N \ O N ^ O. 0 (.1 W D1 i 0) '0 0) -O 4. • C 0 C 0 C L.- N 0 L .0 0 O in •• 0 •- L•0a .x 4-' 0 0 .0 C L 1 N C 041 ... 0 O N tom- U w.•• 0 Q L [0 L L C a) a) C in m U 0..- •- a trw C O m -a 0 N•- L 7 m 0 0-RI m .C4' O a) • c 0 0 '0 .- U L 44 0. C 3 0 m ++ 0 0 •0. 1- U C_ U U N N (0 0 U 0 C •- 0•-• CO-O .- E C tr, L t'!• N C)10 •- U 0 C 4- C 0 Q N 4.1 .0 0 10 1.' 44 0 "0 O N 0 0. 0 O)C 0 0 w(0 •= O N 40 a) 0 • 4.1 a) L C 4- C 0 L .., U 01 4.1 CO C •- C 4.• 1-1 0 4.1•- .-- N U to N L -y'L.M 1- < ••- m 4... 0 .0 a) C N • C••- X 01 0 4-(1- - 1.1 -0 N C x L. dJ (0 0) 0 • U = U( (0 w 0 N VI N N•- •- L .- N 0 f0 0 •- (D 0114- 0 C 3 C N 4- N 0 ..c m N N 7 (0 N . > •C N m i- 0 (0 Ui 41 m +.0 N E - C) 0 C L. +� !, 0 C -- a) L .Y CI 0 0 m •- c 0 > a) w >. 1- U CO - U L. 4) 3 -0 -o .- E a) 10.-- ••• I U... N 4•11 - r N•W • 3 •- 1- -- 'a 0 U U • U N•- U m N'a 0 0 3 L. .1 4- N0 ^ -•0 C Ca L N 0. N 0 -0 CO 1- U C in m •• a) m 'N ^ w'4) m 3 C N C W 0 E 0 0 L "0 > U 0 d.1 0 N N 3 0 N 0 "0 •- U 4- >. p. O •cn .0 O N--tr.% U m- O in 01 a N L 3 .1.1 -q .v O +-1 U) N 0 0 •- N N 3 70 0 y • • U 10 U O C 01 N w L L c -- m 0 0 U •- 0 N i.1 L 4- N CT 0 >• O O .:;• 9 L.- 0 i-I m a) (3. N 0.u 0 N •-••• 4) N 0 7 a) C a) m 41 4- >.+1 c 4. E C L -a I C-" .- O r,.+ (0 L1•- 13 1- --- 3.1 C E O 0•- L N L 1. (- m U U C m 0 C «- 0 0 a) E .0 -0 L U N L .0 as N 0 0 'O 1 U 0 i1 a) .- 0 3.+-C U 0 0 1- 3 0 •- N E 0 > (11 h 0 P"-'a al C <-- C 0 N N 4) m-- U 4- V')•.. '0 N t!) 4- m •- U 41 X •- •- I 3 -- m ++ R)U 'a C L- 0 c 13 '0 Q c 0 4- X.4.1 .-• N W C 0 a (0 a) +'1 C L- U L O N 1- 0 C C .- O N.•.. ..... m a) 3 4- m 0 0 L -1 m .. c Z .0 N•-4 V) (o m.- (n m > (o m .0 >, N m .0 > .0 0 2 -0 -0 CO U C U•- • -0 44 .- .•J C m • • • m N N en cd '` 1. 00 ..�.. .~-.. 4-1 0 .•-. •-• ^ ^ - Q 0 <.U (D (0 N L .0 A• .0 1 'e• <. 1 va = a.' t, = -.., 0 tn ' E I 0 (...5 U) U. Ln a) z 0 - )• ca I , < = cs - '` f 11 * .. C O on a*. L. c , - i Cs' cn 0 , la , 0 en • •• • a t- a) . c , O c .... I Ln (IL 4..1 C . 0 F• 0) = t 0) E ko 0 0 =, c o c_ 1 •o° • ...1 o w > Lia cn "I cm • . to w = (a o . < --t - o • I co < o o I I- 01 La < ea in 1 •-• = La = = I U•I = a CC ..J La I vl I 0 >-- • . cc -0 4.10 U) cg 0 C I. •-, > 0I MI CI >■■0 CI (U - 0 C 11.• = M 4.5 a .- *0 .- .0 .- 0 5/1 •••• 0 10 N 0 0 4) .0 I4 010 0 1 I.- ' V) '0 tatl L. 0.0 0•-- U 0) •-- I- 4J e — a L. co c 0 • a.ul (15 C.) 4-I co C -0 0 Ci•-• -C .- 115 • •-• in If) C4 4.5 m.- Uca) In El:, >.•-••. CU) C) C 0 0•-• > 0 W .0 .0 •-- - LL. E ro -0 0- E o ›..-0 4- c -0,..0 - 4/ 4. 4).= .--C I- •-• C. 0 '0 41 0-- C.) I- 44 0 U C 0 4.-/ c-,1 0 M C ...- 0 UJ +- = 0 4) 4J .- 4.1 0 CC) 0 0•-•• CI- • 0 co% C. CI 05 0 0 .0 U In • 0 L- 0 17 • .- 4) -- • 0 .- 0 ..* > 0•-• 0 +J 0 S.14.. +J en I cc ••• 0 .- a I.) - 0.0 II••••• 0 4) /- I . .. 3 0 .0 cn rt)51.- 0 0 0 41 • (U < N- 4/ r•-•'V ....Y 0 U ..- 4.1(4- I- 4-8 C 1 0 a) •••"' cl) VI C ILI 0.13 0 0 0 4-0 0 u./ C 4) 0 al I- ›.•0 0 5.- 0- C IL. 0) C. 0) 0) i M ..." C M 43 V U 44 0 0 0- cn 0 .0 cn C..) C 0 •••• - - 4.5 . • 5- .0 •5•5 C ...i• LA ' re C. '- 0 ..-... ..... < 0 < U .0 .0 1 I 07: • N cc W i Z U) =Q" Z Z I Z Z Z I I . : Il O 10 N N• in N N cti u. t/) >- 1 ; >1 Y >-I 1 : I Q - - . 03 U. U 4- d C N 41 N 10 C u0 >` 0 Q. L O •E G Q 4011 • o. U ti © E >.•Q 4.1 N.0 C .7' L. to N Q - L CL Q co 4-1-1 0 O 4 0 44 ro in •C1 N 0 QU I F 0 'fl ._ • 1) C 'U O 4-1 a C �a m o 0) m 14 °' • C O 41 U - ••••• <111= 14 • a CO • > D •-•_ E in a) 0 L. _ C le O 0. 0 - C C) CO -'4 - •U C E L • as U to •• ■• 0. O. ro O O C U CO. 0. U U E 41 r N .� .- O 14 10 -- 10 •- U O X 5 E "C3 0.4%1 •- .L 4.1 4.1 0.4J t L. U W Q C1 •2 1- 0. . S Q U N N a) 4.1 ' ro U • C 0 Z Z 1 Q 1 I ' : 1 = I N ' CO 0>. N N U1 U) N I .H Q I I I 1 • Z -1 W - L W • cd 1 a) 1 C 1n 4J C) C T -o 'i 4.1 O U L tT I- > C r _ L 4J a) 0 C1 In CO 10 L.- •• N -- tU O L W C) 0 N-0 g4J 'q • C •- 41 C 0. *0 L r• 0. O .0 4.• .4 'O -C U C U) N 'U N ro.la C) 4.01 t0 1 N to • •• al a+ 4- N• C 0 4.1 4.1 N LA N a) 1 10 • ro C O G a) Z C) N N -0 E 0 •- N 1 a) •J 3 L • 4.1 4.1 d • • .-- .-- L W I a U CO .0 U C O to 4-t 3 Q' C 1 . 0 .1 .0 4J -O Z • N _. ~ N 0 "0 4 � 4-1 0 4-1 C L U •-- 4.1 C 44 .. 4.1 C IM O N • X O C) 4-1 CL. 41 •• O O 0 0 4- N 1 O C) +3 to w- E c • U) 4J t+- -° 3 0 n 1 ••+- E C' E 0. 10 C •- L OI 17 L7 N WO -aO U Oo ¢ N EC E ` o . 5 "1 00 LA U N E L .. C •- •- O O - Q 4. N ro a) •-- 4+ 4-1 C E^ 4J E to E C a)-v • IL) C) C .. > 0. 10 ro-- C) •- 4-- O O .o ro > L a)•U 4+ a) 0. C -C L C a) C c N 41 X .- a) -'U U U E .0 f0 .0 0 ro ro 01 4.1 .0 ro 3 0- --• 0 c.) .- E 4,4 .0 0) .-. 4.1 Z b N Z CC [C N Q. 0- L L L 'O E '7 4J ac L Oa) C) C .0 O 0 O O C .•-- o-•-Q/4- 3 N ..0 t0 I- 4- -p 4- 4'- a) (0 4 0 -v a) tJ to in d 0 7 4 . V) U.I = of(1) = I =1 =I = : 0 X I • I . 1 : 0 • 0 : la c..) in in In.. In . „.„,.. fa • G) a) . a) I O 0 .... >- 71 74 - • • :•e : ) : u ix : C O c0 ! C uj '4- 0 4I1 E ! 0 itt 7 0 ' ! 44 . .. til C ia s- t_ - 0 RI X L. : ... ... a) fa c -cl : .a . In 1- S 0 tO C : c 0 0 4- 00) u) 44 4) - 4: • 40 144 441 47 0 44 • •••0 4•Il • L. C . • = I I- . 1".• E 4- 0 0 0 t - 40 • CV'S 7 0 1-•• 5 5 t E . Cs 0. • • (1) •`• .3,1, .41,2 L.. ! 0 1 7 C * 0 c■J UN.- • • U f4; .... • (0 4(4 40 •-- 3 C I fa 4-I e u'. a- t ft1 t 0 .41 0 4- . I 16+ Ca) fa 0 'V •-• 0 I- .- : 0 4- 0) • ' L•) 4.4) 4.11 4..1 I !• E LL . 44 41 -in n a0)3 t7 O 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 00 O i 44 I. '00 -- 04- S 0 O. 0. • .- 3 0 0. I- 0.,0 41 a) in f E in 0' ,- 0 4.1 4) 0 .--• • 4) t .13 44) .7 L. 1... 0. L• C C .0 In in CL.00 CL a) a) • to to .. ul . _ U m fa 0. Ct. U : 0 -C • 4) . 4..1 C) C Csi .- a) 1'..• 0. .4.1 Cr 0 C in S- RI M 44 0 0 C fu 4- 5 -- .- M. ' C : C e U ... 0. 00 U 0 2 0. . 0) •-• 0 C) L•ir• •••• ''.• fa • *0 .- •-• .--173 0 .- 4.,) .- . - CI.L0 44 Cl . 0 0. 17 C 4.0 • . ...in 0.. '. 0 7. ) ,••• CL. 0 .-' 0 • cir •- = CC 4.1 4- 4 44. 5 = • ' , ?". . . . ........ • ' • • . • ,. v) • tn • - ' I".• • CV . • • = • = . . tu . - = c) 0 0 0 . ..0 I o . , . I )4) , = cc I I I • 0- I 0 4)? •t CO LLI • I 10 0 4/1 so sts so 44-. 44 41) as a) a) a) t1.) -J Ca= =ILI . • 7-1 >,•1 7-j. 7...,1 7,- 03- 4.. -. 7 I 1 A I 0. c = = = =-c a- 0 0 <L., in- 7.40 u.) cl;cL ., I = 14.1 .•••• C I = - 1 • C C •-• V •LJ RI 1 fa 4- . 0 4.1 0 0 4- 01 C a • . . ... t. 1... ca u. o a) 8 vs 0 .- 0 ›.. 4J L. .I.4 44 ti.• M • 4•A •. Cr .1.1 4-1 0 in 0 0. -a 0 t- 4-0 t- 4- c c 1ft 01 0) L. = •••• +.0 0 4-I .1 44 ....• • • 0 00 M 0 0 C 0 0' Er Of • 0._.,- C el,/ 01 0 4- I - 1.• 4-1 ••- 7.. 0 C 0 4-- > In '''. "'" 0 C C 44 •••■ 0 0) M in M tn 0) C C L. IM Cr 0 ;:j 0 ' 0 0 ... O. C. 1 *4 I •ze f-) ing 1 1.4 - - 0. •44 to U) 0..U) C to .- 41 .... 41 a- 43 E ' E I" St 0 • 0 c P., 0 P._ X 1 - -i s- 4- 4J C 41 4-1 -infO C 0 C C) in 0 L. VI 41 0 E E • I- - I .- ON •= •-- 4) -- •-• 14•- 0 -13 In..c 0 o 4-) _c a) 0.) 0 0 41 0 • 0 C C I"- c so c I- c o_ . = .us 0 t.) c U E in 0 _ o 2. -- o ii - 0 •-• ev" .... t....... to a) I 4C so - to • - -- cf.= • 1... ,o '- 14.• •-• s- e 1 E 5 O. 0 .- C 0 0 c•1 .0 0 5 .....co Co 4- 'V 4.1 0 0 0., I eZ '" 0. 0 """ 44 '''- .0 0 0 'CI fa MI -0 0.'V 0. 44t 7- 0 - C 0 C 41 5 5 5 E +-I 0 11- 0 t 0 0 0 to 'No 0 •.0 0 4.1 -- .4.0 0 0 > fa In 7 I = I 7 7 4•8 L L 1- 0 L. t) 0 U '13 4-1 5 'V 0 -I >.- E E E 5 - - a) •-• 0 .-- us..... VI a) us C 0 L. 41 (t) 0 0. L.13 in .... 0 - (U •- - S 0 U i0 0 II 3 -0 u) -4 fa .-- RI 3 U --- 0 0 41 • CG) X 0 X X - a- a) Cr 40 C C C C (.1 C 0 0 0 - U • 0 0 .0 r. ■ L a L•• n ) 0 0. 0 Ct. 0) fa 0) fa •• •- •- t ,-- •-- - 0) C 2 4' -- = (tI X M X X 0. 44 Cl) 44 4.01 CC ..- 44 ...., a) 1-- io 4•1 fa s- o. 44 > al 0 = .4-. ccs- L.. 4-1 0 0. 1.• 0 4.4 t. >--J ..-.. ...., -. 0 4ft 0 et th > CO 4 -13 in 01.0•-••• RI '23' U "0 -7; 21 • ' U) ' . O7 CC Lai CS 0 0 0 =1 Z 1 1 tol- i LI - . I = = to vl 44 I ›-1 ■ L. 0 I a er: C < 4J a) czi a) - a) a) 4J ID ... a) a) L. E .... 4) C • .0 0 1- . .0 C - 1:1 0 •••• 41 0 4/ 0 LIN C 0" 4) L. 9 ..0 ta tr > u. a) - m 1... I- 4- C 0 .- 0 4- 0 W E cr 9 O ns U c or.1 64., 0 7 Cel 0 E . 1.11 1.. ' 9 A 0.1... . csi 01 •-• 7 11% In C e-- 0 c en .a. - ,.- L. 0 - -.1• >. E ... 0 A/ e o -4J 0 0. I- 11.■ ..... 0 ...0 . tfl M • r■ .0 a) la 44 .- 4.4 • 44 4.1 C 44 03 ID .C( 4-0 0 10 0 0 41 . IntOCC 1/1 CL..- 1/1 4.1 0 0 10 10 0 in 4.., 0 1 .... • O - 44 0 0- 10 0' C 4) 0. E 0 .0 L..., L. 0..-- 17 41 •••• L. 0 1, L. 0. 0. 4-0 C 0 ;7 4.4 (2 4- 4) 0 0 C• • U •-- 9 0 CU) C >, I. •••-' 3- e cD C u m u . . ..---. 43 - .-- In CO.•0 •- 0 -9 .- 0 -0 -0 - .-. ,- u .- I-- .- 4.., . O 0.4-i 0 0. 0 0..- 0. co I. CI. 0.4- •-• 0. C C 141 < MOUS . < 17E < 7 . . . 4' C . 0 C.) • ...... . U)1- 0 o 0 = = z • =I 141 CS 1 . I . CC = ,4C I • LLJ e . I cd co u) 44 44 1 = 0 0 0 0 . CY -•• -,4 )-1 >•• Lai ) .... CC - I =1 I 1 1 ' • ct 5 • in -J Z • C O 0 CI3 74 1 = 14.I 4.1 C = 1 C C ti■ 0 0 4- = 143 0 0 0 U 4' 1.4.4 cr• •LA • • CM U. 0 I. 10 10 43 44 1 •-• CL • 4.1 4) - 4./ I 1 = . 4) 1 0 us .1.• I. L. c > CT' 4- U 1.) 0 L. 44 0 Ulc41 •••• 0 0 >. u 4) 0) O. . ...... 4.1 -CI .-- -- CC 4-1 • L. s. 0 I 1-• C L. 44 .... cr 0 " <I et et Gil 10 E0 ..- in E E 94.1 , C.) e 1:1 7 1- •.- 0 X - 0 C 9 .0 9 E 9 4-, 0 ._ tri ' ..... 1. 41 •-• 4) 10 •-.• I •-• .... c ...• 4/1 .-• to- -0 CL. 4.1 C U 0 C C C 0 .-... r- RI ..... C a. ui - to > - o - - u go - 3 ea a) - 90. *-- .../. 9 - 9 E 0 3 0 C. o c4 U) LA.- • 4.1 -1 0. • t c4 .-0,... -0 N. 40 -1".7 41-0 "0 "0 01 L. ).. < •"C7 0.1 >. 4 9r Gil- Gil 0 10 C ). 0 1- LO 4) •.0 0 I. 4., c r.„ 1.- L. 1.. .-- L. -0 10 U 0 *-- •- E • .-- 0 *-- 0 - 00 10 C --- 0 14/ c • 4) c = .... ... u, 3 U 7 0 7 U - 9 0 44 in 1 -.I al ...- 0'•-• C c..1 Cf 10 0" 41 0" 47 •- ••-• U I. C.) 0 U 44 0 .0 •- c..!, (1) O.0 Q. 7 O. 7 -I.. 7 (2) .. ... C ce m 9 4 CC vs Ct 41 CC 1/1 .0 C. VI 1"-- w 1- "C1 4-1 0 CC 1.. U ..-. ..... ..,. 0 < •zt...... 4- • 0 . C • o • tri 07C . ..... o o 0 o c e =1 = RI =1 I=1 E I I I • Lnct..c.: 0 C.1 L3 14- 0 0I I UI •Crs ill 0 1--. 41 0 0 C 0 0 .- 0 .0 - >••1 >•1 >-- L.T1 I 0 ask) 10 C 1 CO 0 .- I 43 •-• • 03 LA. 4/ I- u' 41 .- . 1.1 -- C3 tile - 4.- 1- 4.4 ct • CI 4-1 L. C O • CO le. fp in 0 0.4" In U '0 • in In 0 0 4.1 - 0 . 413 0. 0 I- t) .0-0 •41 o0- - •- .- • C a 1.. ct > "0 I- I- > .... RI 41 1... 0 4.1 a) 0 Li- • 0 (U tt) .14 1... 0. CO 4-I 0. •- 0 O. 4.1 U 4- E 0 -0 0 L. W (U •-- 0) - CD • 0 44 4- • I- C) u 0 . - • 1- 0--- 0 .c s... 0 E = 0- fl) 4.1 .L., 0 W 0 • W ti) .4.1 W 4-i V) 0 0 Pe% 0 0 1-• 4..) .0 L. 14 C1 4-1 I- 0 VI 0 0 444-' 0 r.... 4.4 4.-. W ^- • . . 4-a 0 0 •• (0 0 • C .--LO "0 La.... t. . . 10 ' 04" > 01 0 01 0 0.W C • 0) C '- WC 3 0 4-1 z 4.■ CU .0 ul to - 0 '- 0 4-1 •- 3 .1-I .-0•- l- 0 4-4 - .0 -o E Cl. a •- Gi L. 0) W I . E .C - ••••`• 4-1 0•••"-• W 4.1 0. .•- .0 in E C) L. I.) 0 • .0 0 1... . E M Ct. C E 10 0 4-1 W ' VI E (1) 0 L. - 0 t) 4.1 0 U 0 ' • • 41 4.1 0) C E4" ••-• E .-- -- W - CU ..- .-- 0 4.• •• .... • 0 C . L. •••• 4.0 * 0) 4" • X C. 0 L. 4../ 4.1 01 CL 0 (1) O. 0. 1 .. ... 0 -0 0 C e u - te- C .c (0 CUE M L. 4.3 (5 Cu • .- 0) 4) Xi • 0) cll 0 .5.1 > .0 0 ,C N. 0 IT.0 ..0 C Cr 0 • ta 1- .... 1- c11 0 in 44 1- 0 0 -• ..g... • 4.11 • C • "0 C -0 *- L. 1)... . 0 =1 0 • 0 = 0 Zi 40 0 -0 =1 1 i 00 0 1 I I I -V 01 C C 0 U) in vt .C 0 •• > 1. vi a) 0 )-1 . c 0 >- WI W • 7•T. I ; i.... 0 I >re ik I a . fa w E 4.1 to TI 41 0 as (I) U ID • ..... C N C "-- 'V W I- cU E ..- 4- CU - O 0 ... 67. W c.) 4J •- RI 0 E = 13 0 e 0 3••• 0 4-4 43 0 0 • 0 O 4.4 -0-10 -0 0 (U fa 4- 4- - 4) E _I-. 41 0 L.-0 L..- us 0 -C 4.4 • .0 0 - C 0 101 401 0 0 0 4.1 ..0 U '- 4-3 C ..0 41 L. 03 -131, 1- •-• 0 ..- 0 "a 41 4-1 0 cn a - a • 0 - 0 4-1 in - 0- E 0 .1-1 .- %- 0 E 1 01:1 0 • •••.U) T1 •• 0 I.. (0 C 0 L.4- .-- el 0 •-• 1 4.1 11) I L. C CI cr+a yr 0 (s) cr) - c C 4/ 0 (0 C a) to 0 0 0 1-. a) Ct. RI 41 ..0 .- .0 • .- 0 31) X I 4.1 •-• .- 4-I 4-1 •- L in (0 0 0 0 0 1- a) 0 t. Ler U 0 ct E RI .0 M 0 'X •••••• 0 4- L. ..... N N .CU) 4-1 co - 0440, 0) 4..• 0 0 0 (0 V) 1- (0 > • - • 4-1 sn 4/ •0 ILI L. c u 0 ..- L..- = = 1,- al aNe cn '0 c) a -a U) 0 .0 .- 0 - 13 0.- 0) C in 0 (1) .0 40 0 1- 43 -0 4) 0 L. C 4- = 0 .-- 0 0 0 4- C C 4.1 C.4-• • 4.4 .- Ocs C - 0. 410 0.4.1 .0 4- 4-• 0) 0 In C e .0 0 4- 11- .. .- 0 ors, CI. 0 1- 0 U, 3 0 .- 1- .-- 0 CI .- (1) 1- 0 0 te r.1 CO W 4/ 43 0 C 0 E 0 .- 0-1- -0 0•-• 0) = 0 • 4-1 .0 0. - CD E 4- 0 E 4.0 N CD 0 1.•• (1) 0 0) 0 ■0 M.0 • • -4•1 E 0 > L 3 •- 0 (1/ .- 0 0 fa 4•1 0 -0 (.1 41 01..0 1-- E 0 E VI NI ••••• 0 ..- in t... x ...0 ID 1- 0- u 4) . a) c u) a) O - .- .., .... m .- 13 L. 0 O. Cr X 4J ."' C 0 -IJ 0 0 11 N • C t.)-0 - L- = 41-1■••• In E 0 CO ft) 1 •-•• L. 0 w L. til c to' (0 c •- •-• C - 44 .-- tn 0 0 -• s... x 1- cd = 43 .-- 0 O.. •-• •••• (5 .0 ••••• Ila 13 CU 1 VI t3 C .13 .:- C.) -0 . ... c 0 • Cl : . tn C c us 0. a) •- o =I - cn_c +., L. t) C 4.1 al 0 0 'CO - E 4.1 -7- ... 0'.7P-t. 0 I in -- 4-1 . (..3 '-- U) 4-1 0,--- X a) 4- . 43 1- 0 I: 0 0 - 0 ra:1 O.-0 C 1- i- rfl CI. C 0 a) 4-1 C. a) -C C 0 la MI.- ..0 C CI.= 0 U1 , "0 ...., >•• la 4..1 0 11.1 l'"'" a a) I.•-0 (..) •-• >-1 CI C L. 0.•-• ..0 Q.I .- 0 .- 0 WV 4.4 • 4-. IC RI 4-1 al L- C la , • 0 +-1 0 I- 12 a) .0 in a)./ZI 4.1 (1) 0.44, .E C -)J 0 0 v) 4-1 • 4- 4.4.•■ L.. 0 in 4.4 .- L. a 0 C -0 al••••• a) •- • a) 0 0 0..0 L. E > 4- 0 (.11 4-1 E in E a;) C,) L., 0 4-1 0 0 (I) _ CU) 0 at 0 u .- L. 4.1 .0 tel .- CI 4.1 . flo 4-1 (0 .0 ■■••• 0 In 0 4-1 > C C C 4-1 (0 CL4- 4-1 a L. 0 0 • C L. 4- 0 0 E 4.-1 ... a) E ..c 11) a) a) to I- 0 a.. . 1 -a 4.1U) cn a) ...c a) 0 cri E L. u) . C a) ...c I-- =-0 "10 I-- >..- C 0 •-- a) 3 4-1 a) 0 -•• L. LOU 4-4 4-1 LT. E 4-1 1-- > co • co a) c (t) • - L u) 0 ..0 0 1:3 .1.1 .... 4-1 44. .0 "?... ..... U) 0 (1) 3 4-1 %... C 1.1 OM 1.. 4-1 5 a) ra L. 44 •••••• E 0.. fa•-- CI 4-1 I- 2 L. L. 0 0 (11 4- L. -0 .L.1 L. ... 4.0 in .0 0 1. . Ul 0 0 C tn J.,) E tn 10 •• .' .I.J .0 10 In 0 ...• Ul .••••• t i) - C 4.1 VI Ul...... 4.0.- 1.- Cl) 4- 0 3 -Iv . in 13 111 L. Ct. C'0 14- E c 0 -ti I,n cp a) in a) a) a) Ca .- - in c c_c -0 4,-; .c 4-• c E- tn > a) U) - L. Q) L. ..... - 4..I = -: `,• 1..) I- Ca 1 0 (1) .0 0 •-- tit C J .0 • E - 011 l'a as-a 4-' C. C. C a) U) 1 ' 0 .0 .0 C 0 • C a. L. 4-1 EEOE - " C ...7; - al fa tu tn - 0-- 0 -a 1 ' 4.1 VI .1.1 0 L.) e 0) .0 C a) . U 4-1 L. c c a) -I c -c 4.) 0 L., (1) 0) •-• 0 I 2 (1) 30 0 0 .1-. 4-1 ta •-• ..0 4,1 4.1 0 (1) .-- E 7.- C tu --*a) = 4-1 C --• Cr4- ..0 0. 4-4 -- 4-1C -0 '010- (0E00 U') >-•- -0 117 •-• L- 0 E L) .-- 3.. • .3-I .1a .10 tst s- 3 L. Q L. 0 ..--.- c 0 CC L. 0 E 0 0 ..c L - "0 0 V m (I) -0 w C 0 E 1... >- 0 c co In )-- ct. t) 4) 4-1 •0 •-- 0 RI .- 0 4J CI i .-- fa 4- (11 (1) -0 C •- CI-0 C L. Ul C -10 'ZI 14- 4- C 0 Ct. ID C -1 4-1 s- L. C 0 0 I- (0 4.I O.,C 30 It •::C al 4.0 C 0 .0 .1-.1 .0 .3-$ 0 1.... as In t.. . E (1) •- (..L 41 0 in,4.1 tl) L. . . til c . . . WO, la C '"W •-•• 0 2:1 0 • 0"0 I I . CO 0 I . '0 C) CI c o) v) Le) - = 0 a) >-1 c 0 1 . re•u >c •---- GI I U) CC C 0 00 I -4 -- c 113 > .4 0 1 E I r•M• PM= ti) 1.• Co A: C G) ■ -C 0 a) t- 4-' 0 L. CO 4.., La,44• ' C . • e _c - E- in - • . 4-• 0 in .--- ›.-- u-1 L.- 1 (cl 0•L. 4- In 0 RI 1- 4- 0 0 0 .0 CI E C .-- 4-..0 44 .0 0 4-1 14 1/1 2 - VI C 0 4- t.) .... ' ul I la C 4- fa In E - 0 t)-,- I cd o) ---0 2' (1)* in a) U x c (fl U) I all C L. C 16) 1018 = (// L. as* 0 2 0 .- ".... L. 141 ' 0 C E • 2 fa tit .1.1 . 0 I". -0 .0 3,1 a) 0) .4.) 0 I... -0 0 1 • 0 4.1 0 2 4•4 ..0 4-1 la 0 •- .0 Ce VI 4-1 0 iti • L., 13 • L. ea .... L. ' . = 0 >••• 0) a) r° C C 7 .1..1 '0 1 0 • ..... > 4.1 (..) 4- E L. - • c I. a) - •••• > 1,,-. 0 •-• .- "0 0 4-t 1.- cre•P In-0 . fa 0 0 0.4- C ..0 4.I E C • - )- (4) •- •- '0 0 OS „....„ u_ • ■ in l I• ° � , - I°• NS � d z Z Y N r 4 tt �1 COCJLL - I - C -� • i 1. .. 03.. o- .E 0 O C L • '" ++ in E O O. C ar °)u ..CC a + i+ • .C- + E G)••u . . 0 I- 0) 4.1 - • - Q y� N' L 4) 4- .•0 ++ O .d a7 c W .y_UN i•1.. - u 4- • .O . - 00 0 •-•.•- • O .0 • q•4l- .L.' m O • u1 O'•o: a) 0 - .O O L C O • 1"•••• 3'� 0' 4a • . • a . .. U,•..- )- . •- +- •• . _ - a) • - � • C L.L •. ' O .. •41 • - 0) 4) . .•o - Q, o_ o o • F•- '; mi N ii, : •- D. U . 0 _ C'.a U1.00. : C a) •o J.1 ��+ N - 'p � • . . O N � . . - 03 u a..c of E U a 0 o vOi .-4.1w m E .0 s a U in U '- N N C. 0 a) a) . . v14•. in 0 a o.° = W O$.-O X•. .4.+• _ - L • - • - • L 111 L t�pp •0 - • C3 v ; c • a x Le) z - • - Q I +•-. s m w 07 •to O • . a . o as U •. - • . X03. - :. • . • Cr I c' z `y. 7•• • • ZW,..., . .. 4 1 . •• . .: • .J ' zy J W Ot - • C) o.. Q'-- C - ID O. . �1 . 0) 0 W. 2 1 . o.1.) .CD c = LL) 7 .c•� 0 .0 a) E = a) a) 3•-1 Cl. O) a) F+ C C+ 1•. G) L CA 0. Q EE «C•1 C)•f! •L 0 C+ m (4 4C.) .OU 0•-1 .t: C 0 .P•1 �+0+ CO 0 C.3 E 4) CD 0 •.1 a) a°0.1 0 GOO I a) .0 • • 0 .o 0 -o co- ••.,(4 1~ C U 0. U'CI VS•••1 )..4- 4.. f0 C+.).1 C••0 •.•1 0 .0 4.. as .a. •d Cl. a.0. ..-1 3 C)� 0 -.4 ;4 r0.1 N O in i+- •0 O).O O in 3 C t. W CO L O C• t1. 0 .no O CO C .I CO CO 0) CL CO 0 • .v a) 0) -V' Qt.$4 0) C O '0 C ' +-1 N C U U a) a) "17 0 .1.3 7• a)•.0 • C. H 97 1+- C O 03 .1.' 0) 1 t� N Qa F• •r) •••i •• E 00) r0•. N o tea) 4. }.C"00 a) co a3 a) Pi 3 ti.. 0 0) • 0) 0 C+ 0 03••r1 C 17 U •• ?. Cr C) 1 C C3 • •0 0 0.■ 0 0 E O > C 4- •.1 CO (4 0) .s.r. -.i C) O 11- C) 0•••1 W C O 14•n O Ca•••1 •.-1 0 •" I 7 a) .0.N•••1 013 C 0) O ••-• •13 0 u1 4.)•-1 v C .O 0 .4) U -0 C) 0- 01010. C3 0 0 'C3 CT • ••�+ 0 C m' Co a) v ••-1 a) (.4 U CO c.1 •••1 Cl) .--4• S 1-• •+1 •.•1 C 1 c. C .•1 =••-1a o c•. e) .0 x 0 ca -I $.. (I) H Ca U .4 - d !part. 0 .14),0 ^ ' i 0 - to " to - 0 07S zi =1 zi E z.- I I I 0 )- 1 I I L. ra 0 co • . _c crt U U) .c •-- U) >. 3U - 3 to 4-, a) ...... I- -0 > •-• < c 0 ts. 1.- -0 11) 0 4.1 -C1 i 1.. n M O 0 01 C V •-• 4/ U1 E O > • a) U) I- -0 0 - 0 C )-- -- - 0 -0 In E L- a) M .C1 4.1 "0 7 CD 44 to .c I E > • 0 4-1 to 4, . L. -- &I 1 1.1 44 3 a) C . L.) ta u na E c . . urn u 1- . - o -... "0 •- 4- O 0. s- 0_ C 0 - ct. 0 .. 0- 0 O 0.1 < 4- < U ,-. -.1 . tal • C ..- 1 •0 -- C Ai 1.. U.. 0 C M = 0 0 li ' 01 I Z =1 Z. 0 a) I 'a i = % co c .0 0 .... E 0 in to I X CE a) 0 0 c 0 >- . . I . a) I _ v 1 .t) 1 - . 0- •4.. 0 1 0 • 1- .-. 01 7 co C E to .-- c 1 Incl la 4- C Ul C M3 C 0 C 4.I -12 CO ti-• m 0 0 .- 11/ 0 .... t g - C 1... C 0.• 0 4-/ .0 0 .0 • 01 41 •... ..- to to 'a 44 u) 4- • t- 44 to '4- • 0 0 E -0 -X 0.c 4.. 0 0 4.1 0 0 4.0 0 in u ). - 0 c 1- .0 4.0 0,C CD u1 4.. r••• (1) 1. .... ...... -1 • I- 41 (GUI 1-• C 0 • 0 1-1 0 0 0 4.• U .- 0 3.. • .' 3.1 0. .0 0 ..- Ct. 4.■ 0 C 41 a) -• to a al ,- Cr = ' en co+4 ,1•1 •.. 0 .. -- C 0 0 0. 1,- 0 C 41 0 C. <I. 0 g 0 3.• E uk 44- .0 1-. E to .c 1- • a) -a- 0 --- 3 0- 0 a ...... .... 0 0 ... (I) tit 0 to -0 E 0. 0 44 -0 L. I "0 44-0 L. a) V.- , a) •-cs I- to E 03 0 0- .9 s.0 0 4.1 0 L. L. •-• 1-1 .0.... ,,, (0 L. e■ U (0 3 4- I. 4- 0 41 I- •- t./ 41 U 0 to - 0 - U 0 ,LJ 0 - - -0 0" 0 -0 - 'V CT M t.1 41 , C 0 C 1 4- a•'^* o 4.- ct- - c a) ... c - c to c ..C- V to - 14- -to C cr 4., t_ io. IA O. co L- a) to 0.. ma L. co 4J 4.* - ,. C U 4-1 4-- c 0 a) 6. 4-1 0 0 0. 4, ..1- .E4 O..1.• .... .... L. C 0 41 1.3 to< to 4- to •""' < vt 0 1- to < In 0 co 3 < 72 8 1 x . 4 i 0 <'-.- -. -... 1 in . cC 0 0 0 W 08€ I Z =1 =1 = , VI CI • • 0 a) 00 I I I . - • -13 _ C 1.: 4.1 3.. 11.7110 0 In -CI a) &I .0 O CO 0 U, ..... 0 LI CL C CO • +3 0 0 = = La 1.1 C In t..., = ...,.. - - 0 . F. 0 -.. . La < ' z 0 0 0 0 0 La Le C1 • GO = I I = 0' .... = Ut = = VI I/1 I 0 I Ce = C) 0 0 0>••1 ...I .1 .tt tL. cG = - I c) • • 1 - -co C 5 E al 1 Z 0 . a 4- C o 4.) C 0 C ill 4.II .c U 0 1.- 0 -0 .0 0 01 - LL. L) 0 C C "0 0 CO cot- ...-.40 0 .... -0 c 4- ..c • 0 .- .-- 43 .0 L.• 0 C CO I Cl. "0• 0 C •-• 0 *a 0 U a L. Ol ..0 0 0. - 0 0 • a in in RI C 0 il) 0 C in - 0 . C L. 0 1- C 46 '0 - - C 0 UI " cO• -0 .= 0 I 1,7c C L. • in E-C3 al . al a 11- 0 4-1 la III 0 4-1 41 CO 4) C .0 4.) Iti "0 ..0 CD 44 ier .... 0) SO 0 0) 44 II.' C 0 in -al 1 - E c .5 "J c;"F-1 0 0 • 0 0 -1 al L. E - 0 41) LI.. IA 1.) L. 0.. . • 4.1 C Cr 1 C 0 LI- 0 0 L. " O. 0 U L.) ct. = tn 0. 0 .- 0 0 Pr% 0 0CalCiudienta 0 (1) LiN..... 1 < Cr 0 I-cq C ...0 4.a =4. ct. cs. U L. . .= .... 0 -1" • • Q) uu (11 ... 1 I cd c.4 a) 0 0 4-1 -• 0 0.0 0 0 01-0 in 0 - 4-0"CI ..0 0-0 in 0 > tn.-.. ‘0 •,..... > _C 0 L. VI V) " CO • 0 0 al .0 -12 al 1-1 - 0 4-1 1, " L' OcO0C0 (DOM.-. 00C CL. 00 U U, 0 0 in in al 10 4.2.0 ..-..- ... - to - ta....... > 1.1.! C 0 0 -C .-- _..i to C 0 4.1 4.11 0 0 .-- 1 c") C U- _c - 1- C .0 0 • - .- 44 I- 3 < to 1-- 9- .... • . c.4 A 1_, -0 4.• c I- 1- 0 ••-• < 0 1 • In = 0 0 0 • 081 = I I I Lt. ••■• in C1 tri CD ti, .4... in VI in CI - •-• 0 0 1 41C = = I I I 0 CD •- en C 13 c O. 4.) 1. 0 - a . VI-0 0 . 44 •Li I.- a) — 0 .0 .0 • O al :a in u me •-. u • a) ••- _ U a. - c 0. 0. m 0. ...... -u • al "0 0 7. .&0.e 4-P= w z 0 C = .._ 1., c I. i.n 0 L., z ..... — 0 u, = I,_ 0 — ct 0 0 IA) co w• Z zi al cg 1:1 C.1 = I I = 7f. LU I • -- = = = 1•1•1 = o en 0 0 a) a) 0 >•I >-, P-1 ..j .4W < 0_ c4 I 1 I = el ..a co = -o u.) a) = 4.) - m 0) 1.. CD 441 MI 0 11. .1 ...- CD .1 C. 41 in '1:7 61 0 . 14- m I = z .- 0 En .0 I. a) I 0 I_ I. 4-* 13 a — mu o incl in 0 .c 17 •1.0 3 W ..- 1•I••• "0 0 •-••• 4J L. CO 0 4-1 0 in 2.0 4-• C C •-• I- c L. •-■ u) t,)•-. Irl (1) 0 0 la •• < a) al a) 3 C 44 Cø C..) E ma C u al al .0 0 CO 1- 1.4 1- u) a. C - 0 c I5 ( 3 > - 4-1 --- 4•1 co u >.- -1 I. (u = a. 0 o.o -a I- E la a) Ul 4-' o.. .- 4.4 .4.) 4n - s- 0 = , al a) 14.. • 0 a. = en c E 0" E c I me co .... < ' 0 a)-tf en 0 14- 01 0 c) • 0 co - 0 -.1• L. c a) c- 0 c 4-' .a) .0 1- -0 0 o ce ty 0•••• 3000 )-- 0. 4-) 4-4 - 44 44. •.-, ua a =— 13. I- -. 0 Ln .c 0) 0 0 .0 -0 3._— C > 0 0 1. 14-. at e.) c a. a• ).. a) LI 4) 0 ID .-.- •-• U > til I 0) ICI 0 )- 00 .0 UJ C a) c = O. co 4-4 "0 en u.) 0.c0 - 0 -- )-- 1- 14- 4-1 -I al ••••• c c.) a U - • . - .- .... 44 I"." -0 44 C • , tr■ IX 1-I 0 4- ....... O8 • • d r400 • tvtCC oT. r x way • meeiige 4*. -. ' \,. .. . / 7",at ---;----...,: ��', rEH 4114 RO 11•• . Ct• ,./• • • o.. ' •:k I * >>'".....—.' g?-.1* - ./. ' - . 1 ( :. ..7:-1:: / - liov'. Al . . i . t • VICINITY MAR •• • '"NO SCALE - 1140glit PHILIP POST 082 & ASSOCIATES • ENGINEERS/PLANNERS/SURVEYORS #52504 24 May 1985 Ms. Susan Smith Orange County Planning Department 106 East Margaret Lane Hillsborough, N.C. 27278 Re: Stormwater Management Plan for West 10 Mobile- Park Dear Ms. Smith: The Stormwater Management Plan that we. recently submitted to you for West 10 Mobile Park, is of the format and detail required for pro- tected watershed basins in the University Lake Watershed. We realize that this project lies within a protected watershed and- that the format of the submitted Plan does not address all of the requirements of sec- tion 6.23 of the County Ordinance for Watershed Areas classified as - - PW-II. We further understand that infiltration of the first one-half inch of stormwater runoff from impervious areas is the intention of Stormwater Management Plans for PW-II Basins. We are currently working to revise the submitted plan to meet the requirements of the Ordinance for PW-II Watersheds. The revised plan will emphasize infiltration of stormwater runoff into the ground and not peak flow reduction. We are uncertain how Orange County pro- poses surface water will infiltrate into soils in the County in view of the predominence of heavy clay soils throughout the County. In this respect, we need assistance from the staff on how the Ordinance can be met at this site or any other site in the County. Upon completion of the revised Stormwater Management Plan, we will forward the Plan to the Planning Department. We anticipate finishing the revised Plan by Friday, May 31, 1985. If you have any questions, please let me know. li Sincerely, �.` Jh6; ?co it4it �5 B. Thomas Dixon, Pr ject Manager Cy. to: Darryl Garrett BTD/dht (919)929-1173 a 100 EASTOWNE DRIVE a POST OFFICE BOX 2134 N CHAPEL HILL,NORTH CAROLINA 27514 084 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I am a resident living in a site built home (standard home)located beside or very near a trailer or trailer park. It is my opinion that my (our) property values have not declined due to mobile homes being located beside or very near my (our) home. j • Name Address 1 City State Phone it I -5/2g/i5- I 544( I 08 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I am a resident living in a site built home (standard home)located beside or very near a trailer or trailer park. It is my opinion that my (our) property values have not declined • due to mobile homes being located beside or very near my (our) home. • Name it) f 1J g,„,/,,1 4C& Address - City ta,„.1c,..„7", State hfP Phone # y - 5. 1 Waited 5(A4/95- 08€ May 27, 1985 Orange County Commissioners Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 Dear Sirs: I have been asked to render my opinion in regards to the effects of the proposed 40 unit mobile home park ( to be known as "Nest Ten Mobile Park" ) would have on market value of established dwellings , already located in the subject neighborhood. The request for my services was made at approximately 3:00 P. M. Friday, May 24, 1985. The short period of time has not allowed for me to do the proper research. I have read through the "draft Findings" supplied by Ms. Susan J. Smith. planner, employed by the Orange County Planning Department, to Ms. Vickie Bletso. I have also briefly toured the neighborhood. In regards to the "Findings #2: That the development will maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property" ; it is questionable that this "Finding" is supported by the applicants' statement. The packet of information supplied by Ms. Smith, does not adequately indicate that this "Finding" has been satisfied. It was noted that there are already a number of mobile home units • located within the subject neighborhood, as allowed by the present zoning ordinances. As stated above, due to the short notification 08ri- for this assignment. I cannot give a data supported opinion of detrimental effects on market value of the on site constructed single family dwellings by the locating of more mobile home units within the subject neighborhood. It has been my experience during my ten years as an appraiser that mobile homes located within a neighborhood near on-site constructed single family dwellings, tend to lower the market value of that single family dwelling if and when it is sold. A buyer is not willing to pay as much for a site built dwelling where a mobile home is nearby as the buyer is willing to pay for a similar dwelling in an area where there are no mobile homes nearby. Also, the selling time for the site built dwelling is usually longer where mobile homes are located nearby. Market value is defined as follows: Market Value is the highest price in terms of money which a property will bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller, each acting prudently, knowledgeably and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: 1- buyer and seller are typically motivated. 2- both parties are well informed or well advised, and each acting in what he considers his own best interest. 3- a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market. 4- payment is made in cash or its equivalent. 5- financing, if any. is on terms generally available in the community at the specified date and typical for the property type in its locale. 6- the price represents a normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special financing amounts and/or terms, services, fees, costs, or credits incurred in the transaction. It has been my observation that a mobile home, due to its general 08E construction, deteriates and/or depreciates at a faster rate than the ordinary site built dwelling. This can cause an economic obsolescence which has a detrimental effect on market value of the site built dwelling. Economic obsolescence is defined as follows: Economic obsolescence is the impairment of desirability or useful life arising from factors external to the property. such as economic forces or environmental changes which affect supply-demand relationships in the market. Loss in the use and .value of a property arising from the factors of economic obsolescence is to be distinguished from loss in value from physical deterioration and functional obsolescence, both of which are inherent in the property. Economic obsolescence is also referred to as Locational or Environmental Obsolescence. 1 hope that this is helpful to you in making your decisions. Thank you for allowing me to be of service. Respectfully submitted, JOHN W. SHARPE, ASA - SRPA QUALIFICATIONS OF APPRAISER Name: John W. Sharpe Employed by: Moon Real Estate Company 1766 East Webb Avenue Burlington, North Carolina 27215 Education - General: University of Georgia Elon College - graduated 1956 with A.B. degree in Business Administration Education - Special: Realtors Institute - Courses A, B and C American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers - Courses 1-A, 1-B, 2 and 8 Society of Real Estate Appraisers - various seminars including Report Writing, Capitalization and Discounted Cash. Flow Analysis, Appraisal of Condominiums, Marshall Valuation Services Construction Costs; Course 202, Applied Income Property Analysis; Cash Flow & Risk Analysis; Market & Marketability Analysis; Investment Feasibility Analysis. American Society of Appraisers - Seminar on Form 70 - Single Family Dwellings 1 09C Partial List of Clients Served: TransAmerica Relocation Services, Inc. Alamance County Bank of Alamance American Mortgage Insurance Corporation Equitable Relocation Management Corporation Graham Savings and Loan Association City of Graham, North Carolina Merrill Lynch Relocation Management, Inc. Southeastern Savings and Loan Association Greenwood Mills. Inc. Gilliam, Coble & Moser, C.P.A. Commercial Credit Corporation City of Burlington, North Carolina • Gate City Savings and Loan Association Northwestern Equity Mortgage Duke Power Company General Electric Mortgage Insurance. Co. Types of Prop- erties Appraised: Commercial store buildings Residential properties Rural lands Small Apartment Complexes Duplexes Industrial buildings 09i Churches Small Nursing Homes Properties for condemnation Condominiums Experience: 1956 to 1967 - non related Real Estate work 1967 to 1971 - part time Peal Estate sales 1972 to 1974 - full time Real Estate sales 1974 to 1975 - part time sales, part time appraisals 1976 to present - full time appraisal work Appraisal assignments completed in Alamance County, Orange County, Caswell County and Guilford County, North Carolina Professional Designations: Realtor. G.R.I. ASA. Senior Member, American Society of Appraisers SRPA. Senior Real Property Appraiser. Society of Real Estate Appraisers 5728/15- PUt. biSPIR/IV6 092 real problem cited. he described the property and noted i, was on a transition area. Reid Roberts indicated that neither he nor C.D. Smith no Jery Van Webster were notified of the public Hearing. Smit responded that all property owners within 500 feet of th; subject property are notified and that 'in' the case of Scotttswood, labels for certified, return-receipt notice= were prepared by Data Processing. McAdams expressed adverse to negotiate with staff an. receive futher imput. MOTION: Commissioner Carey moved to continue , the public hearin. until July 1, 1985. Marshall seconded the motion. • Attorney Coleman advised the Board to readvertise the public hearing and renotify adjacent property owners. , VOTE: The motion carried unanimously. Agenda Item # JAMES L. FREELAND REZONING, Presentation by Collins. Barbara Paige representive of the Hillsborough Planning Board noted that the public water and sewer lines for this area were uanpproved and subject to a connections moratorium. There were no further comments on this item. Agenda Item # WEST 1Q MOBILE PARK DRAFT Presentation by Smith. . Smith introduced the May 24, 1985 letter from Philip Post and Associates into the record and introduced five photos submitted by the applicant of existing parks identifying the proposed park. _people were sworn in. Vickie Bletso, property owner along Squires Road, expressed opposition to the project, specifically addressing each of three general findings. She cited concerns with traffic, outdated trip data and compatibility with existing uses. She submitted an appraisal comment prepared by John W. Sharpe. She also entered into the record five photographs of the site area and one photograph alleged to be of the mobile home park owned by one of the applicants. She continued addressing general finding #3 indicating that if th project is in compliance with the Land Use Plan then she i not supportive of the plan citing aesthetics inconsistencies with a stable neighborhood; lack of site vegetation and screening/landscaping details; desire for reduction of the number of units to one per five acres; and a desire to redesign the park to locate the units further back on the site. Darrell Garrett, applicant made a presentation on the project. He described the AnA 09 • QRAri rT • He rebutted Bletso's comment that the su mitted reply was a photo of a mobile home park owned by another applicant. He noted he had visited all adjacent property owners within 500' excerpt two he could not reach, citing that he had not utilized a back door approach to the project. He noted thereis a strong need for well-planned mobile home parks in the County. He continued that the park proposed would be subject to restrictions/rules of tenancy; all homes would be • new, including replacements over time; that he had surveyed local mobile home dealers to determine need and type of homes feasible; that units for sale or over eight years old must be removed from the park; that a cluster, method was utilized which resulted on a 250' buffer on three sides and a 100' buffer in the front; that an improved recreation area of 12-14 acres was proposed; and addressed traffic on West 10 Road, noting traffic was light. Garnett submitted two letters from individuals living near mobile home parks stating they had no concern regarding the parks and submitted .a photo of an existing park typifying the park he was proposing. Commissioner Lloyd inquired about the rules of tenancy. Garrett responded that he had developed them through incorporating the best park rules he could obtain and adding some of his own. . Commissioner Carey asked if the pictures he submitted were of a park he owned. Garrett responded no, but were examples of his intentions with this development. He noted he would not like to disturb the back side of the property. Commissioner Lloyd asked if - the picture submitted by Bletso was of a park owned by the applicants. Garrett responded it was not adding that the park that his partner owned was built in the 1960's and that some occupants had been there 25 years and that their units were old. Commissioner Willhoit noted the site was an open field and inquired of the applicant's intentions to landscape the project. Garrett responded he intended to landscape the front side with the largest trees which could be physically planted with a backhoe for the earliest possible growth; he intended to fence and plant shrubs and cedar trees along the sides, noting he cannot plant trees within the drainage fields. Willhoit asked how wide a visual buffer was proposed. Garnett responded in the front 100' and the sides 20' . C. E. Squires, Jr. indicated if he did nto understand the standards cited on page 102. He questioned possible area devaluation. Cited road hazards and speed limits on West 10 Road; expressed his concern that this project was not in the best interest of the neighborhood; and asked that if approved the Health Department investigate the park within thee months. David Squires, Jr. expressed concern regarding traffic impacts and childrens activities in the area: about- fha 2RAFT 094 quality of people likely to reside in the park; and th= quality of water supply in the area. Michael Chiorazzi expressed concerns regarding the sketch plans; site slope and visual problems; traffic; and th- nature of the present community to be changed by the park. Kent mann indicated he felt this was a better approach an& provided more control that individual lot or subdivisio development. Garrett cited the appraisal comment submitted noting it was a guess and questioning what materials were made available to the appraiser. He expressed concerns with not being able to question the appraiser. HE noted the appraiser needed access to drawings and plans and cited landscaping plans he had that tom Squires was given access to, but that he had not received a request for from the appraiser. Bletso, responded the appraiser had access to everything she had received from staff. Agenda Item 0 SUBDIVISION TEXT AMENDMENTS PRIVATE ROADS. Presentation by Collins. Walters cited the problem encountered by his neighbor in subdviding his property. Alton Cummings described his concern and inability to subdivide his land to give his sons homesites with a 30' right-of-way versus a 60' right-of-way. Commissioner Wilhoit asked if a variance could be granted. Smith responded there were no variances granted to Subdivision Regulations. Commissioner Carey questioned the 60' right-of-way. Smith responded 50' was required. Cummings noted the land was to b used for family only. Commissioner Lloyd asked how staff could address this. Smith responded staff had proposed this amendment to address similar problems. Lloyd asked Cummings to contact staff to see if what is being proposed will allow him to subdivide his land. Henry McDonald noted he is presently unable to subdivide a lot so as to receive a building permit on land he purchased by deed as he is unable to secure additional acces beyond a 12' right-of-way. Agenda Item 0 WATERSHED STANDARDS Presentation by Collins. Yuhasz questioned the difference between. the Town proposal which applies the stream buffer standard from the stream versus the County proposal which applies it from the edge of _ (0 - (7-8S P(-ein I)) 6ci 09c )14 ; no4_.e 12 Abstention: Yuhasz Shanklin asked if the Board could indicate a positive finding if developed at R-2. Collins responded the same criteria would be applied. MOTION: Shanklin moved denial of the request. Walters seconded the motion. VOTE: In favor: (5) Gordon, Pilkey, Walters, Kramer,Shanklin Opposed: Pearson Abstention: Yuhasz Those interested in item 7e2 asked if the Board would consider it this evening. The Board indicated it would be considered first under the amendments if time permitted. Agenda Item #7d. WEST TEN MOBILE PARK WEST introduced the item. MOTION: Kramer moved positive findings on 8.6.1-3 Pilkey seconded the motion. I VOTE: Unanimous. MOTION: Pearson moved positive findings on all items covered from I page 083-094 of the public hearing agenda from 8.6 a) 4 through 6.23 d) . Walters seconded the motion. . Kramer inquired why item 20.3.2d) was not marked. Collins responded the requirement was not applicable to the project as no zoning change, except to planned development was requested. VOTE: Unanimous Smith addressed items 6.23 e) and f) . She noted that under the planned development process submittals may be considered which satisfy the intent of the Ordinance to a comparable degree with a submittal meeting the letter of the Ordinance. She noted that staff recently encountered technical difficulties with the 1/2" infiltration standard and that the stormwater management plan submitted by the applicant was a comparable solution and met the intent of the ordinance. 1 09E 13 Shanklin asked if the plan met the ordinance requirements. Smith responded it was an acceptable solution. MOTION: Pearson moved positive findings on 6.23e) and f) . Shanklin seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous MOTION: Pearson moved positive findings on all items under 6.24 on pages 096-099. Shanklin seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous. The Board addressed item 8.2.2 General Standards. Smith cautioned the Board that the letter of approval submitted by the opponents to the project was "heresay evidence" and that the applicant had opposed the letter and did not have the opportunity to cross examine the appraiser who had prepared it. MOTION: Pearson moved that noevidence was submitted which would indicate that general standards 1-3 under 8.2.2 have not been satisfied and, therefore, moved approval of the project with the conditions presented at public hearing. MOTION AMENDMENT: Pearson revised his motion to apply only to 8.2.2 1-3. Yuhasz seconded the motion. Kramer asked what precedents had been set with regards to considering letters of appraisal. He asked if these were judgement calls. Smith responded individuals can speak to the value of their own property and that it was a judgement call in considering appraisal. VOTE: In favor: (5) Yuhasz, Pearson, Shanklin, Kramer, Walters Opposed: (2) Pilkey, Gordon MOTION: Pearson, moved approval of the project with the attached conditions. Yuhasz seconded the motion. Smith addressed the differences between the applicant's proposal and the conditions regarding the standard of road and the construction of the nature trails. The applicant proposed a gravel-paved road and natural base nature trail but the recommended conditrions provide for NCDOT subdivision road pavement standards and an improved nature trail. MOTION AMENDMENT: Yuhasz moved to delete condition #12. O9. 14 Kramer seconded the motion. , VOTE: In favor (5) Watlers, Yuhasz, Pearson, Shankln, Kramer Opposed: (2) Pilkey, Gordon MOTION: Yuhasz moved to revise condition #7 to read asphaltic treatment. Motion died for lack of a second. Shanklin questioned the applicant;s intention. The Board by consensus, did not revise condition #14. Shanklin addressed condition#11. He indicated that rural routes only allowed mail delivery on public, not private roads. He indicated that the provision of cluster mailboxes could not be dictated but could only be subject to a decision made by the applicant in consultation with the postal authorities. Shanklin moved to revise condition #11 to read "Mailboxes which are clustered The Board approved of this revision by Consensus. VOTE ON MOTION FOR APPROVAL: In favor: (4) Walters, Yuhasz, Pearson, Shanklin Opposed: Gordon, Kramer and Pilkey Pilkey moved to extend the meeting. The Board approved of the extension by consensus. Agenda Item #7e: ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENTS 7.e.2 Non-profit Educational Cooperative Yuhasz questioned "direct access" under item 8.8.4.2d) . Gordon responded it meant frontage. MOTION: Yuhasz moved to revised 8.8.4.2d to read "frontage on". Pilkey seconded the motion. VOTE: IN FAVOR: (5) Pearson, Walters, Yuhasz, Kramer, Pilkey OPPOSED: Shanklin, Gordon MOTION: Pilkey moved approval of Article 8.8.4. as amended. Walters seconded the motion. MOTION AMENDMENT: Yuhasz moved to delete 8.6.4.2d) as too restrictive. ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date July 1, 1985 Action4fenda Item 01- SUBJECT: PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENTS DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes X No Attachment(s) Information Contact: SUSAN SMITH PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENTS DRAFT 5/28/85 PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES DRAFT 6/17/85 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Telephone Numbers Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 968-4501 PURPOSE: To consider approval of proposed Zoning Ordinance text amendments submitted to public hearing on May 28, 1985. To receive the Planning Board's recommendation on the proposed amendments. NEED: The proposed text amendments would address deficiencies in the Zoning Ordinance. An issue statement precedes each proposed amendment and is an attachment to this abstract. IMPACT: The proposed text amendments, if approved, would improve the ordinance and provide clearer direction in its administration and enforcement. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Staff recommended approval of the amendments as presented to public hearing. The Planning Board recommended approval of the proposed amendmendments to Articles IV, VIII, and XXII regarding "Non- Profit Educational Cooperatives". The Planning Board recommended approval of the proposed amendment to Article XI regarding non-conforming mobile home requirement due to concerns with the workding "or dwelling units." • . 09:1" 1 PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENTMENT ARTICLE IV: ESTABLISHMENT OF PERMITTED U$E TABLE ARTICLE VIII: SPECIAL PSES ARTICLE XXII: DEFINITIONS ISSUE: The Orange County Planning Department has received a request from the Health Sciences Consortium to amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow for this use in areas outside of designated activity nodes through the special use permit process. Health Sciences Consortium is a membership organization founded in 1971 by the deans of 12 southern medical schools to develop and disseminate instructional materials in the health sciences and health-related areas and to train faculty from its member institutions in the selection development and utilitization of educational resources. They are seeking a rural, versus commercial, site for a facility to house staff and provide training workshops. Staff initially reviewed the Consortium's request for zoning approval under the provision regarding universities, colleges and institutes as permitted uses in the Residential-1 zoning district. Staff opinion was that this provision in the Permitted Use Table refers to institutions of higher learning having similar and related chracteristics in their educational purposes and which grant academic degrees. The purpose of Health Sciences Consortium is to develop and effectively utilize instructional materials to improve education in the health sciences area through distribution of these materials and training of faculty in their use. While the Consortium is affiliated with universities and involved in educational activities it serves as a clearing house for educational materials. In reviewing the Consortium's activities with their representatives staff suggests that an appropriate mechanism for providing for this use would be the Special Use Permit process. EXISTING ORDINANCE: This use is currently provided for as a permitted use in commercial and office zoning districts under the "health services" or "offices and personal services" classifications. 101 2 PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE: Amend Article 4, Section 4.3 Permitted Use Table to provide for "Non-Profit Educational Associations" under a Class A Special Use Permit in Agricultural- Residential zoning district. Amend Article 8 by adding Section 8.8.24 Non-Profit Educational Associations" 8.8.24.1 Additional Information In addition to the information request in Sub- sections 8.2 and 8.8 the following shall be supplied as a part of the application. a) The site plan shall also contain the following: 1) location, width and type of all internal vehicular and pedestrian circulation 2) location and dimensions of all on-site signage 3) boundaries of the site and distance to nearest residential structures. b) Description of the proposed use(s) of the site and the buildings therein, including the following: 1) amount of area allocated to each use. 2) number of full and part-time employees 3) number of clients expected to use the facility 4) proposed hours and days of operation c) Building plans for all existing or proposed structures to include floor plans, elevations and sections showing proposed use. d) Landscape plan, at the same scale as the site plan, showing existing or proposed trees, shrubs, ground- cover and any other landscape materials. e) Statement from the appropriate public service agencies concerning the method and adequacy of water supply and wastewater treatment. f) Statement from the appropriate public service agencies concerning the provision of fire, police and rescue protection to the site and structures. 10.1 3 g) Copy of the organization By-Laws and/or Articles of Incorporation. h) A detailed description of the organization, its staff, membership, affiliations and activities. 8.8.4.2 and .rds of Evaluation The following specific standards shall be used in deciding on an application for this use: a) The site plan submitted meets all requirements specified in sub-sections 8.8a) and 8.8.24.1a) . b) Al]. applicable requirements of Article 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10 and 12 have been satisfied. c) Fire, police and rescue services and water supply and wastewater treatment methods are adequate to serve the proposed uses and facilities. d) The site is served by frontage on to a paved state- maintained road. The developer must show that the existing facilities have the capacity to handle the additional traffic generated by the use or has an agreement with NCDOT to upgrade the facility to accommodate expanded needs. e) Internal vehicular and pedestrian circulation is designed to encourage smooth traffic flow and reduce hazards. f) All access roads and employee/visitor parking areas shall be paved. g) No chemical, toxic or hazardous substances are used, produced, stored or consumed on-site. h) Development of the site as proposed would have no adverse impact beyond the building, except for appropriate parking facilities. The floor area of a building or group of buidings housing a non- profit educational cooperative shall not exceed the maximum floor area ratio as permitted by Section 5.1.2 of this Ordinance. Al]. buildings associated with the operation of the cooperative shall be designed to be harmonious with the character of the zoning district and neighborhoods in which it is proposed to be located. i) The applicant must demonstrate its compliance with the definition of "non-profit educational 4 cooperative" as contained in Section 22 of this Ordinance. .10`ti 5 Article XXII Definitions NONPROFIT EDUCATIONAL COOPERATIVE An organization operated on a non-profit basis whose purpose is to acquire, produce and distribute instructional materials for the benefit of its member institutions. Membership is comprised primarily of fully accredited schools of health, education, social, legal, environmental and/or engineering sciences in institutions of higher learning (universities, colleges and technical institutes) . On-site faculty development workshops and fellowship training programs may also be provided as part of the organization's purpose. 570(4051R3116. 12/Ai 6 A4IAIa5 the flood plain. Collins responded staff proposed that curret County Standards dictate. .. Yuhasz expressed concern with utilizing USG maps for applying this standard as they are not intended for this purpose. Commissioner Lloyd noted that this could result in restricting use of many acres of land in certain areas. Yuhasz expressed concern with unnessarily restricting uses allowed under the current floodplain ordinance from occuring and that these proposals are not well thought out. Agenda Item # ZONING ORAINANCE TEXT, AMENDMENTS OCATIONAL_ COQ2EBATIvES DR AF Presentation by Smith. Willhoit questioned regulating toxic materials. Smith responded it was a provision desired by the Planning Board. Chris Herndal described the needs of the Health Sciences Consortium. Willhoit asked the relationship between use of the facility for staff versus a retreat facility. herndal responded 20 - 30 full time staff were proposed with some use of the facility for training purposes. No formal presentation was made nor comments received on the remaining public hearing items. 1 PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT ARTICLE XI NON - CONFORMITIES SECTION 11.9c) ISSUE: In the administration of zoning/building permits during the last 4-5 years, the Planning Department staff has interpreted Section 11.9c of the Zoning Ordinance to allow for replacement of mobile homes where such a unit constitutes a second principal structure on one lot, unless the unit had been removed from the lot for a period greater than six months. The section of the ordinance which regulates the number of principal uses on a lot is Section 6.3.1 which states: "It is the express intent of this ordinance to regulate the number of principal structures constructed on each lot within Orange County. There shall be only one single family residence per lot . . . . " The staff interpretation that Section 11.9c) would apply to the replacement of mobile homes which violated Section 6.3.1 is incorrect. The Ordinance specifically addresses the replacement of non- conforming uses in Section 11.9d) . The only exception is Section 11.9d) which specifically addresses the replacement of mobile homes in a mobile home park. Staff is no longer issuing building/zoning permits for the replacement of these non-conforming mobile homes. However, staff would like to pursue amendment of the Ordinance to specifically allow this action. At issue is whether the intent of the non-conforming provisions to bring such situations into compliance with the Ordinance over time should be reconsidered given the nature of this housing type and the flexibility it provides in upgrading and/or replacement of such units. EXISTING ORDINANCE: 11.9 Non-Conforming Uses of Major Structures. Or Struct- ures and Premise in Combination Non-conforming use of structures with a value higher than in 11.8 above, or of such structures and premises in combination, may be continued, provided: 106 2 a) Such uses may not be enlarged, extended, altered or replaced, except for a change to a use permitted in the district in which located, except as provided in b) below. b) A non-conforming use may be extended through portions of a building manifestly arranged or intended for such use, but not otherwise, and shall not extend to occupy land outside such building or any additional building not used for such non- conforming use at the time that non-conforming status was established. c) If a non-conforming use ceases for more than one hundred eighty days in any two year period, subsequent use shall conform to the regulations of the district in which located. d) Individual mobile homes within mobile home parks, non-conforming under this section, may be replaced with other individual mobile homes or dwelling Units provided that the total number of units does not exceed the number existing at the time that the mobile home park became non-conforming. PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDMENT: ADD -11.9e) Individual mobile homes not located within mobile - home parks may be replaced with other individual mobile homes or dwelling units. 107 PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT ARTICLE VI ARELICATION OF DIMENSIONAL REOUIREMENTS SECTION 6.16.6 REGULATIONS GOVERNING HOME OCCUPATIONS. AS AN ACCESSOgY USE ARTICLE XXII pEFINITRIONS ISSUE: In the administration of the home occupation provisions of the Zoning Ordinance questions have been raised regarding the intent of the section which specifically addresses the product of the home-occupation. Section 6.16.6.1 d) and 6.16.2c) restrict home occupations as follows: "The on- premise sale and delivery of goods, which are not the product of the home occupation is prohibited." Although staff has interpreted this provision to allow only goods produced on the premises, the intent is not clear. Nor does the provision address retail products sold on-premises which are associated with the home occupation, for example a beauty parlor which sells hair products. EXISTING ORDINANCE: SECTION 6.16.1 d) and SECTION 6.16.2 c) The on-premise sale of goods which are not the product of the home occupation is prohibited. PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDMENT: Revise to read: The on-premisea sale and delivery of goods which are not produced on the premises is prohibited, except in the case of the delivery and Zale of goods incldental to the provision of a service. Add to Article XXII DEFINITIONS: Goods, Incidental. Retail goods for sale in a manner customary and subordinate to the provision of a service, eg. beautician selling hair products. -DM FT etliA0►N 6 &b AW ,Y( i11 u 5 6 - (7- S'S 10E 1 14 Kramer seconded the motion. , VOTE: In favor (5) Watlers, Yuhasz, Pearson, Shankln, Kramer Opposed: (2) Pilkey, Gordon MOTION: Yuhasz moved to revise condition 07 to read asphaltic treatment. Motion died for lack of a second. Shanklin questioned the applicant;s intention. The Board by consensus, did not revise condition 414. Shanklin addressed condition411. Be indicated that rural routes only allowed mail delivery on public, not private roads. He indicated that the provision of cluster mailboxes could not be dictated but could only be subject to a decision made by the applicant in consultation with the postal authorities. Shanklin moved to revise condition #11 to read "Mailboxes which are clustered " The Board approved of this revision by Consensus. VOTE ON MOTION FOR APPROVAL: In favor: (4) Walters, Yuhasz, Pearson, Shanklin Opposed: Gordon, Kramer and Pilkey Pilkey moved to extend the meeting. The Board approved of the extension by consensus. Agenda Item 47e: • k _ •LD. A), TE t , E Ol k-NT 7.e.2 Non-profit Educational Cooperative Yuhasz questioned "direct access" under item 8.8.4.2d) . Gordon responded it meant frontage. MOTION: Yuhasz moved to revised 8.8.4.2d to read "frontage on" . Pilkey seconded the motion. VOTE: IN FAVOR: (5) Pearson, Walters, Yuhasz, Kramer, Pilkey OPPOSED: Shanklin, Gordon --- MOTION: Pilkey moved approval of Article 8.8.4. as amended. Walters seconded the motion. MOTION AMENDMENT: Yuhasz moved to delete 8.8.4.2d) as too restrictive. inc 15 The motion died for lack of a second. VOTE FOR MOTION FOR APPROVAL: IN FAVOR: (5) Gordon, Walters, Kramer, Pearson, Pilkey OPPOSED: (2) Shanklin, Yuhasz Shanklin and Yuhasz opposed the restrictive requirement on road frontage versus an easement. MOTION: Pilkey moved approval of Article 4.3 Pearson secondedf the motion. • VOTE: Unanimous MOTION: Pearson moved approval of Artile 22 Kramer seconded the motion. VOTE: IN FAVOR: (6) Gordon, Kramer, Pilkey, Walters, Shanklin, Pearson OPPOSED: Yuhasz Staff requested that the Board considered 7e) 1 due to administrative delays on submitted building permit applications, in anticipation of this amendments consideration. ARTICLEJI NON-CONFORMING MOBILE HOMES Yuhasz noted this item refers to replacement of mobile homes. Smith clarified it allowed other types of "dwelling units" also. Gordon expressed concern with the lack of discussion on "dwelling units" as this makes a difference in implementation. Yuhasz asked why the homes are non-conforming. Collins responded generally because of the restriction of one unit per lot. MOTION: Shanklin moved approval of the amendment. Pearson seconded the motion. Shanklin questioned who would replace a mobile home with a house. Gordon stated the issue was not "would" but "could" VOTE: IN FAVOR: (3) Pearson, Shanklin, Yuhasz OPPOSED: Kramer, Gordon, Pilkey, Walters. All were opposed to the wording "or dwelling units" r, ORANGE COUNTY BOARD CF CORMISSIONERS Action Agenda ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Item No. (131 Meeting Date: JULY 1, 1985 SUBJECT: ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD--STORE SITE #3 DEPARDOW: COMP/ MANAGER PUBLIC HEARING: Yes X NO ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: MANAGER'S OFFICE X501 TELEPHONE NUMBER: YES Hillsborough - 732-8181 • Chapel Hill - 968-4501 Mebane - 227-2031 Durham - 688-7331 PURPOSE: TO consider assuming the title to ABC Store Building #3 located on Highway 49. NEED: The County has additional needs for document storage space. Acquiring the ABC Building would permit storage of documents • currently not utilized by County offices, but require retention under State law. IMPACT: The ABC Building is located approximately fourteen miles north of Hillsborough, however, it is an ideal facility for storage. The building is secured with a burglar alarm. RECCIIMENDATION(S): TO assume title of the ABC Store #3 for storage. Vifa COUNTY OF ORANGE RBI MAY 1.17 1985 • ALCOHOLIC.BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD 122 HIGHWAY 70 EAST aoam kEreEn HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27278 C.U.6loORE (919)732-3432 sHn BACK w Cl MARY HOWES IA.BENTON EHNJO.Cereal Mugger CHARLES EIHEWOGE z�x May 16, 1985 Mr. Donald Willhoit Chairman Orange County Commissioners 203 Lexington Road Chapel Hill, N. C. 27514 Dear Mr. Willhoit: In the ABC Board meeting of May 13, 1985, the matter of disposing s Po si n g of real property at our store #3 site, located on Highway N. C. 49, in Northern Orange County, was discussed. In an earlier meeting a decision had been reached to close this store because of declining sales and a lack of profit at this location. N. C. Statute will permit exchange of this property from the ABC Board to Orange County with or without consideration. The ABC Board would like for the County Commissioners to consider if they have a use for this lot and building, and if they do, the ABC Board would be willing to execute a deed of gift of the property to Orange County. The building is a block (12 inch block) building with a built up roof. • Building was built in 1959 and roof was re-roofed in 1982. • Size of building - 22' x 60' Square Feet - 1320' Size of lot - Copy of plat of survey enclosed 1 The building has 2 front doors, 1 large window at front, 1 side rear 1 door, counter with bullet resistant glass installation, and shelving. Counter, shelves and bullet resistant glass could easily be removed. We have a water line connected with our neighbor, but I feel any new . owner would need to work out their own agreement to supply water for the toilet room. This building is heated with bottle gas. -2- 16C If you have further questions, please feel free to call me at 732-3432. Thank you. Regards, a(/i1)PaA/J M. Benton Efland General Manager Enclosure cc: Ken Thompson ABC Board Members MUSSumgmessesswaisammu........--_ _. _... f.,..0 .A.1.1 w,•-•.%b • 1 . : 11 • ......................... .. k 1 161 1 .1' . .. ..,.., .... ,. ..„.. lik , ..,.:.. '1 A \ • - • ...- . .... ... .,. ... . -..,,,, 0-- ,17-01 ./.6-• 11 ‘- . A. ,., \ qi. v. . ‘k. t: Xt kz • Nt,■•• , . :',.'?' ' •(0 ;..'".: .e. - . \ 0°' b't. I NX 's ' ' .. • . . t" ", Beilb ii 14 "A \ '.'.'. ' •` ■ ' i `I • \ DO' v%t••t.; . ..,.% ..• --- s\ o° \ .% ''. w. 7,-. .66(.1.4,• por,.\ ,.. _v.... cit:. i# g;,Oetr &Mr,i, '.1" ' o AP \ . . 2 z.7 2 *". • cifkr-ar"?<1.1t. Tos, 4'..•;----,,,t,,,v-o\Zez.0,,,,q',--4' \ ' „ Nwssusgs$01%* . 1 ti m ,...k . !ii: \t,k il k w.- % el ') (11/ • 1 I It t . i...g lh,Ihvc1:- 14 '51 \044 4r, ItN46 IP Lic i it ,,,,,ki k hi o % / (It% 'k 11 I!, %! ki, .401.,,...a.:4_. , _.emaTcgr..._, . %co \ - !I ; h,,c1,h • : If kh01„,14 n 431 %Ai .P.. k I 1/4 Zit w 2 '• 4 ■ 11 I "'pi \ k 4, b 1 a' ,N k.4161 64kt 4 r * .if l ',,i 13h1 i I - CA tti 4 r' A .4 .., .0 • t Et i k • ___..............................................................3...................._____ OFFICIAL 1 COPY APPROVED 10/15/85 MINUTES ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REGULAR. MEETING JULY 1, 1985 The Orange County Board of Commissioners met in regular session on July 1, 1985, 7:30 p.m. in the Commissioners' Room in the Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chair Don Willhoit, and Commissioners Shirley Marshall, Moses Carey, Ben Lloyd and Norman Walker. ATTORNEY PRESENT: Geoffrey Gledhill. STAFF PRESENT: County Manager Kenneth R. Thompson, Assistant County Managers Albert Kittrell and William T. Laws, Clerk to the Board Beverly A. Blythe, Planning Director Marvin Collins. Director of Revenue Johnny T. Horner, Planner Eddie Kirk, Tax Supervisor Kermit M. Lloyd, Director of Economic De- velopment Sylvia F. Price, Planner Susan Smith and Director of Personnel Beverly M. Whitehead. A. BOARD COQ None. 3, AUpI pCE comma's None. ('r, PUBLI,CCHE RIDQ ON RE PR$�1 DRIVE (SR 1591)/BRIGADOON DRIVE/MCDERMOTT DRIVE Planner Susan Smith presented for public comment the Preliminary Assess- ment roll for Renfrew Drive/Brigadoon Drive/McDermott Drive. The total cost for the project is $15,800. THERE WERE NO PUBLIC COMMENTS AND THE HEARING WAS DECLARED CLOSED. Motion was made by Commissioner Walker, seconded by Commissioner Carey to (1) confirm the assessment roll, (2) accept the Certificate of Mailing offered by the Clerk, and (3) direct the Tax Collector to collect the assessment. Con- firmation time was 7:32 p.m. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. p. ADOPTION OF THE_1985-86 BJDGET ORDINANCE Chair Wilihoit proposed that at the conclusion of the discussion on this item, an interim budget be adopted for continuation at the same levels as the 1984-85 budget and the item be continued to Wednesday, July 3, 1985 for final adoption. Commissioner Walker presented to the Board a plan which be feels will provide the necessary funds for the schools without increasing the tax rate. His plan is as follows: (1) Give each school system $10.00 more per pupil for current ex- pense making the total per pupil of $701. (2) give each school system $50.000 more for current capital. (3) Go with a reduced add-on list apart from schools. (4) Do the pay-as-you-go plan for long range school capital out of the sales tax revenues. (5) Do not raise taxes any more than has already been done with the 1/2 cent sales tax. (6) Correct fund balance problem that Chapel Hill has on the dis- trict tax. He also proposed to include only those following items on the add-on list: (1) Commissioners' Budget - delete $1,485 as proposed. (2) Social Services - Cone Mill Fund only and delete the word pro- cessor. (3) Parks and Recreation - Homestead Project. (4) Department on Aging - one secretary and delete the I/R position. • (5) Sheriff's Department - secretary and furniture. (6) Adolescents in Need Program - continue with same funding as 84- 85. • 2 (7) Womens Health - delete $1,500 as proposed. Commissioner Walker proposed that one half of the Revenue Sharing and the County sales tax reserve be used to fund the add-on list. He suggested that with regard to the Chapel Hill fund balance that a study be done to correct the • problem. He stated it would take an increase of 1.9 cent on the district tax to maintain an adequate fund balance. He recommended that the County Manager study ways to prevent the fund balance problem in the future. Commissioner Carey agreed that tighter control needs to be maintained over what happens to the fund balance - not only of the two school systems but of other agencies that the County funds. He disagreed with cutting from the add- on list the school nurse for the Health Department and the money for the animal society. Chair Willhoit disagreed with cutting from the budget the add-on request for the Department on Aging, Social Services, Home Health Agency, Library, and all volunteer agencies other than the $1500 decrease for Womens Health. Commissioner Marshall spoke in support of the word processor for Social Services indicating it would help with the extra workload they are experiencing. With regard to revenue sharing she proposed allocating 3/4 to help fund the mark-up list. Chair Willhoit clarified that the 1.8 million balance from the sales tax in 88-89 is only there because the schools have yet to identify the capital needs for 88-89 for which the money will be allocated. Bill Ray, farm owner in Cedar Grove, asked that the Board of Commissioners hold the line on the budget and not increase the property tax. Bill Dorsett, Chair of the Agricultural Business Council in Orange County, opposed raising the property tax. Gordon McDade, Roy McAdoo, Richard Daniels, Don Collins, Lilly Evans and Albert Cummins spoke in opposition of the proposed tax increase. Commissioner Lloyd commented about the fiscal responsibility of the Board and the need for additional industry to increase the tax base. Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Carey to adopt an interim Budget Ordinance for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1985 and ending June 30, 1986 at the continuation appropriation level of the 1984- 85 fiscal year to remain in effect until the Budget Ordinance for 1985-86 is adopted. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to continue this item until 7:30, July 3, 1985. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. F. ITEM, FOR DECISION 2, ANNIE MAE EDWARDS AND JOSEP BDWQRDS-PRELIMENARY, Susan Smith presented for consideration of approval the Preliminary Plan for Annie Mae F. Edwards and Joseph Edwards. The property is located in Chapel Hill Township off Neville Road (SR 1945). There is one additional lot proposed out of approximately 5.8 acres. The applicant is requesting a Class C private road to serve the two lots. The Planning board recommended approval. Motion was made by Commissioner Walker, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to approve the recommendation of the Planning Board. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 3. JAMES HILL REALTY-PRELIMINARY Susan Smith presented for consideration of approval the Preliminary Plan for James Hill Realty. The property is located in Cheeks Township along Mill Creek Road (SR 1343). Six lots are proposed out of approximately 31.30 acres. The Planning Board recommended approval. Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve the recommendation of the Planning Board. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 4. 'KENNY MARTIN-PRELIMINARY • 3 Susan Smith presented for consideration of approval the Preliminary Plan for the property of Kenny Martin. The property is located on a private road (Elva Lane) off of NC Highway 54 in Bingham Township. Three lots are pro- posed out of 4.15 acres. The lot sizes are 2.12 acres, 1.08 acres and .95 acre. The property is zoned R-1. On June 17, 1985 the Planning board recom- mended approval of the Plan subject to the following conditions: (1) Label Elva Lane as a Class "A` road on the plat. (2) All setbacks be indicated or provide a note on the plat which states the typical setback requirements. (3) Change the Class "C- road name from Martin Place to Daylight Drive (Martin Place would constitute a duplicate road name, therefore the applicant requests that it be changed to Daylight Drive). (4) Indicate the lot area for 4A outside of the right-of-way and label as such. (5) Indicate the distance (in feet) to NC Highway 54 from Elva Lane to the northern property line of Kenny Martin's property. (6) Upon construction of the Class °°C°° road a swale or french drain system be created. Motion was made by Commissioner Walker, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to approve the recommendation made by the Planning Board. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. s; _;_PI'S-MINOR SUBD. Vint CLASS A PRIVATE ROAD Susan Smith presented again for consideration of approval of a Class A Private Road to serve the minor. subdivision of the properties of Curtis Farrington. On May 20, 1985 the Planning Board recommended approval of a Class A road to serve the minor subdivision. At their June 3, 1985 meeting, the Board of Commissioners directed that the Planning board reconsider this item, particularly in terms of potential density and right-of-way problems. At their June 17, 1985 meeting the Planning Board reaffirmed their recommendation of May 20, 1985. Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner — Walker to approve the recommendation of the Planning Board. VOTE: AYES, 4; NOES, 1 (Commissioner Marshall). 6. GEORGE HORTON miming RBJEJ Marvin Collins presented for consideration of approval a rezoning request on 86.51 acres located along Highway 70 Business southeast of Hills- borough. The present zoning is R-1. The applicants are requesting 26.25 acres to be rezoned to OI and 59.86 acres to be rezoned I-1. The Planning Staff recommended denial given potential traffic impacts and demands on public water and sewer facilities. The Planning Board recommends approval. The Planning Staff felt the applicant had not provided sufficient evidence to meet the re- quirements set out in the Zoning Ordinance in Article 4.2.3.b for water and sewer or in Article 4.2.3.e which indicates that the maximum amount of land zoned to OI classification shall not exceed five acres. The Planning Board found that the request from Mr. Horton did not represent a normal situation because of the industrial research type project proposed and that the applicant had met all the requirements of the Ordinance. Commissioner Marshall noted that when you are rezoning land you are not working with the individual and that something is needed in the Ordinance that is between the planned unit development regulations and a rezoning. It is a risk you take when you approve a rezoning without planned development because of the uncertainty of the type of development that will actually take place. Commissioner Walker expressed concern for the legal ramifications of treating different applications differently instead of applying the ordinance to everybody equally. Motion was made by Commissioner Walker, seconded by Commissioner . Lloyd to approve the recommendation of the Planning Board. 4 Chair Willhoit asked for a clarification on the requirement of the Ordinance for commitment for water and sewer and questioned the support of the Town for the rezoning only if the desired flexibility could be maintained. Mayor Frank Sheffield stated that the Town of Hillsborough took the position of supporting the rezoning on the basis it felt the location to be desirable for an Office/Industrial Park and the Town Board did make a commit- ment to provide water and sewer service to the site subject to the approval of the plans and specifications by the Town and the State. Chair Willhoit noted that in the past, the Board had not entertained a straight rezoning and questioned if a change in this policy would pertain to like decisions made in the past in encouraging people not to seek a straight rezoning but to apply for a planned development. Attorney Geoffrey Gledhill indicated that the statute of limitations had already run on those past decisions. VOTE: AYES, 4; NOES, 1 (Commissioner Marshall). 74 JANE, I. PREEI4EDREZONING EEQ ST Marvin Collins presented for consideration a proposed rezoning request for 1.5 acres of land located along Faucette Mill Road north of Hills- borough. The present zoning is A-R, while the requested designation is R-4. The Planning Board recommends denial on the basis that the criteria for rezon- ing have not been satisfied. The applicant did not satisfy Article 4.2.3.b or Article 4.2.3.c, On the basis of two negative findings, motion was made by Commission- er Carey, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to deny the request for the rezoning. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 8. WEST TEN MOBILE PARK-PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-HODUIJ 9/SPEC34L US$PERMIT Marvin Collins presented for consideration a proposed Planned Development-Housing/Special Use Permit (R-1) application for Darrell Garrett and Waylon McFarland for 37 acres of land in Cheeks Township. The purpose of this request is to permit construction of a 40-unit mobile home park. The Planning Board has found that the application does comply with the general standards. specific rules, and required regulations and recommends approval of the request with the conditions listed below: (1) The grantee of this Special Use Permit shall post with Orange County, in a form acceptable to the County Attorney, a bond or letter of credit in an amount equal to the cost of all public impovements plus 10%. The amount shall be determined on the basis of fully executed construction contracts or certification by a registered engineer employed by the grantee of this Special Use Permit. Security for construction of the improvements in this project may follow phasing-in the project. Specifically, as improvements are completed in each phase a corresponding amount of money may be released from the security instruments or the security instruments may be renegotiated based on the -yet to do" portion of the improvements. (2) Security shall be provided for the grading, paving and stabi- lization of all cleared areas, streets and other vehicular traveiways; sidewalks and other pedestrian walkways; erection of street signs; utility installation and hookups; recreational faciities; landscaping and mulching around all mobile home units (3) All necessary easements to permit utility (electricity, tele- phone and cable television by any cable television provider franchised by Orange County to serve this development) install- ation, servicing and hookups to the development and to each unit within the development shall be provided at no cost to the utility provider. (4) Roads, parking areas, walkways, street signs, utilities, recre- 5 ation facilities and sites, landscaping and mulching around units shall be maintained as constructed. All such improvements and facilities shall further be maintained and operated in a safe manner. (5) The grantee shall promulgate rules and regulations govering ten- ancy in the development which shall restrict accumulation of trash and rubbish outside of the mobile home units, shall re- strict storage of goods outside of mobile homes and which shall further prohibit the storage of junked or unregistered motor vehicles. The grantee shall file with the Orange County Planning Department a copy of the rules and regulations promulgated under this condition and maintain an up-to-date copy of the rules and regulations in the Orange County Planning Department. (6) A single extranceway shall be provided. The entrance shall be located and designed according to Department of Transportation recommended road connection standards. (7) All roads within the mobile home park shall be hard surfaced in compliance with NC DOT Subdivision Roads Minimum Construction Standards (p.19 E Pavement Design). (8) All roads will be named and the names not duplicate any other names within Orange County. Road name signs to Orange County standards shall be erected at all intersections. (9) Removal of snow and ice from the roads in the development and the sidewalks within the development shall be the responsibility of the grantee. Such removal shall be completed promptly. (10) There shall be at least 2 parking spaces per mobile home unit in the development. (11) Mailboxes which are clustered shall be provided close to each entrance, but far enough into the development to prevent traffic problems on West Ten Road. A pull-off shall be provided and the mailboxes set back off the main entrance roads. The entrance roads and pull-offs shall be of sufficient width to allow three or four cars to stop and get mail while others continue to pass. The mailboxes shall not be located in a place that would require cars to cross traffic, make unnatural turns or go against the flow of traffic. Cluster mailboxes shall be located outside of sight triangles for entranceways. (12) Prior to the initiation of construction activity, final approval by the Orange County Health Department of the well and septic systems must be obtained. (13) The recreation areas shall be constructed as provided in the application and submitted site plan. The pedestrian paths and nature trail serving the individual units and the recreation areas shall be a minimum of 72" wide and be composed of surface materials recommended by the Orange County Recreation Department. A pedestrian crossing shall be provided to the nature trail at the north-east corner of the residential cluster. (14) That all signs be erected in compliance with Article 9 $ign following issuance of a building permit and prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any unit. No sign may be erected within the sight triangles for the entranceways to the development. (15) Grading on the site shall be kept to a minimum. In lieu of planted landscaping, existing vegetation shall be maintained between units. • 6 (16) All plans for drainage, soil erosion and sedimentation control shall be reviewed and approved by Orange County. In addition, Orange County shall inspect the installation of control devices and the on-going work for the total project. The project shall at all times meet the requirements of the Orange County Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance. (17) The project must remain in unitary ownership and no lots can be sold to individuals. (18) A unit numbering system and corresponding unit location shall be filed with the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permit. This system shall be used in obtaining and issuing any building permit. Any change in the unit numbering system must be filed with the Orange County Planning Department. (19) A final boundary survey of the Planned Development and improve- ments shall be recorded by the developer. (20) The final site plan and narrative of the project incorporating all changes, deletions and additions through the final approval of the project are incorporated herein and made a part of this Planned Development Special Use Permit. A copy of the final site plan and narrative are on file with the Orange County Planning Department. Grading and building permits, upon appli- cation, will be issued after approval and recordation of the Special Use Permit. (21) The development shall be built and operated according to the site plan and written narrative supplied by the developer and in compliance with the above conditions. Commissioner Marshall asked if the Planning Board addressed the traffic problems and the devaluation of adjoining property values. Susan Smith indicated there were no points of discussion. DOT had indicated the traffic count in that area is not sufficient to be a concern. WITH NO FURTHER COMMENTS, THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS DECLARED CLOSED. Motion was made by Commissioner Walker, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to find the same positive findings as found by the Planning Board. VOTE: AYES, 4; NOES, 1 (Commissioner Marshall). Motion was made by Commissioner Walker, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to approve the recommendation of the Planning Board and the stipulations attached to the approval. VOTE: AYES, 4; NOES, 1 (Commissioner Marshall). 4,,, PRO-. POSE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENTS (see descriptive narrative on pages of these minutes). Marvin Collins presented for consideration of approval two proposed Zoning Ordinance text amendments that were submitted to public hearing on May 28, 1985. This item was continued to receive the Planning Board's recommen- dation. The first amendment deals with the establishment and the permitted use table for 'Nonprofit Educational Cooperatives" as a Class A Special Use Permit permitted in the A-R zoning district. It would also add to Article eight a list of the specific requirements that a nonprofit association must submit and also add to Article 22 Definitions the definition of a "Nonprofit Educational Cooperative". The Planning Board recommended approval of the proposed amend- ments to Articles IV, VIII, and XXII. The second amendment had to do with a provision to Article 11 regard- ing non-conforming mobile homes which would permit individual mobile homes which are not located within a mobile home park to be replaced with other individual mobile homes or dwelling units. The Planning Board recommended denial of this proposed amendment because of the wording "or" dwelling units. The Planning Board does not want mobile homes replaced with stick-built homes. Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Chair Willhoit to approve the Planning Staff's recommendation to approve the amendments as pre- sented to public hearing. 7 Carl Walters, representative of the Planning Board, indicated that the reason for the Planning Board denial is that usually a stick built home is much larger than a mobile home which makes the lot nonconforming because of lot size and setbacks. VOTE: AYES, 4; NOES, 1 (Commissioner Marshall). Chair Willhoit questioned Article 8.8.4.2.g which reads `No chemical, toxic or hazardous substances are used, produced, stored or consumed on-site , and noted that this section should make specific references and be defined. Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd that item '"G~ of Article 8.8.4.2 standard of evaluation be defined and brought back for adoption at a later date. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 10. REQ ST FOR SPECIAL PUBLIC BEARING-PRE. INC. Susan Smith presented for consideration a request from PHE, INC. to schedule a special public hearing on August 5, 1985 to hear a rezoning request to allow for expansion of the established Adam and Eve operation. Chair Willhoit explained the reason for holding a Special Public Hearing. PRE, Inc. was under the impression they could expand on their present site. When they applied for their building permit they were informed they would not be permitted to expand because of zoning. They need to know as soon as possible if they will be allowed to expand in order to proceed with their planning. Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner Carey to schedule a special public hearing on August 5, 1985 to hear a rezoning re- quest to allow for expansion of the established Adam and Eve operation. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. Susan Smith presented for consideration of approval a request that Stallings Road (SR 1198) and Rollingwood Road (SR 1194) be paved under the Orange County Participatory Paving Program. Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner Carey to accept Stallings Road and Rollingwood Road as a PPP project. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 12. PLANNING GOALS/OBJECTIVES/WORKPLAN FOR 1985-86 (a copy of the work program elements is in the permanent agenda file). Marvin Collins presented for consideration the work program for the Planning Department in the 1985-86 fiscal year. It was decided that a meeting needs to be held with Chapel Hill, that the comprehensive planning for the water reservoir study and the designation of reservoir sites in Little River and Upper Eno Watershed could be done as one project, and that (1) subdivision regulations update, (2) planned development standards update, (3) special use modification standards update, and (4) road capacity studies/road definitions and classifications be moved up on the list of program elements. 13. SOCIAL_ SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Cary to approve the continuation of the contracture' agreement with the firm of Northern. Little and Thibaut to provide special legal services not otherwise provided by county government for fiscal year 1985-86. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Walker to extend the Caldwell Fire Insurance Rated District from four road miles to five road miles. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 15. APPEAL OF TAX APPRAISAL Kermit Lloyd explained that R.D. Stone takes exception to the appraisal of his property located on Tax Map I.D. 4.45c.A.4. Mr. Stone made his request for a hearing within the required 30 days from his Notice of Change "l r Q(� 8 in value. Mr. Stone's property was appraised using the Schedule of Values adopted for the 1981 revaluation and an outside inspection of his home. Mr. Stone would not let Mr. George Meyer, Chief Appraiser, see the inside of his home. Lloyd recommends no change. Mr. Stone spoke in his behalf indicating that the square footage measurements of his house were estimated wrong but have since been corrected. He maintained that the house is not complete and therefore the appraisal too high. Action on this item was delayed until August 5. 16, AGING G= EXJ?&UTION Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve the RSVP Grant Award from ACTION for the period July 1, 1985 through June 30, 1986 in the amount of $24.775 in Federal funds and authorize the Chair to sign. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 17 GOVRRNOR R YN+s ECOr ITIQH PRQMUN- Eok VOI MEEgS Commissioner Marshall explained the recognition program planned to be held during the first part of. November. Because nominations had to be presented no later than July 22, it was felt that enough time would not be allowed to receive nominations and make a decision. No action was taken on this item. 1S_ JULY 4. 1985 FIR7 WOWS DISPLAY Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd. seconded by Commissioner Walker to approve a fireworks display to be held at the Collins Little League Field on July 4, 1985 and authorize the Manager to sign letter of approval. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. G RIMORT ON In ARC STORE BIJI DINQ Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner Carey to assume the title to the ABC Store Building 03 located on Highway 49. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. ADDgR ITEM VOTING D LIG TE F NCaCC AMWAr CQU jMM Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve Norman Walker as the voting delegate for the NCACC Annual Conference. VOTE: AYES, 3; NOES, 2 (Chair Willhoit and Commissioner Marshall). E--- AP�M+ S I. CQ= T .R MM AMSC gBS This item was continued until July 3, 1985. 2, TAX S-UPERYISOR AND TAX COL T FCTOR IBM Motion was made by Commissioner Walker, . seconded. by Commissioner Marshall to reappoint both the Orange County Tax Supervisor and the Orange County Tax Collector for two year terms. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. Chair Willhoit adjourned the meeting to Wednesday. July 3, 1985 at 7:30 p.m. in Superior Courtroom, Hillsborough, North Carolina. Don Willhoit, Chair Beverly A. Blythe, Clerk