The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda - 02-04-1985 . - 001 . _ I- - • ._ ORANGE COUNTY • ''‘: . BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agnda. .5,1-, ..' ACTIO AGaDA Itern No. C. N' T ITE.I ABSTRACT st- MEETMG DATE February 4, 1985 ti 11' 4i...--. Subject: MINUTES t * VL_Departrmnt: Board of Commissioners Public Hearing: yes x. no A ..,f ot• k I Attachment Cs) : Information Contact: '0. Beverly A. Blythe Under separate cover Phone Nuaber: t. ,ral ,..v PURPOSE: To correct/and/or approve the minutes as submitted for consideration: = ff:el, • January 7, 1985 - Regular Meeting lt January 15, 1985 - Regular Meeting •.,1 January 22, 1985 - Special Meeting (Personnel Ordinance) 1:k January 29, 1985 - Special Meeting (Department Reports) NEED: Approval of the minutes so they may be entered into the official minute book in the Clerk's office. RECOMMENDATION: As the Board decides. ■ 4 '1 141 Ellionow _.---- .".2A 002 .-: . ORANE COUNTY- BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agenda It ACTION AC:ZAMA ITE4 ABSTRACT .MTM-EMIG DATE 2/4/85 • Subject: APPOINTMENTS • L Departrent: BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Public Hearing: yes x no Attachment(s) : ' iriformation Ountuat7t: BEVERLY A. BLYTHE ,,- UNDER SEPARATE COVER 7 Phone Ntimber: 732-8181, ext. 505 • f '-. PURPOSE: To maintain membership at effective levels on Commissioners' appointed Boards. REED: The following vacancies are announced for the first time for information only: B-3 - CAPITAL HEALTH SYSTEMS AGENCIES, INC. - 1 vacancy(replacing Allan Steckler , who wishes not to be considered for reappointment). , . - HEALTH AND MEDICAL CARE ADVISORY BOARD - 1 vacancy (replacing Ralph McCallister whose term expires on February 15, 1985). B14 - ARTS COMMISSION - 10 vacancies. The following vacancies are announced together with the indication of the status of securing candidates for possible appointment consideration. All vacancies have been duly advertised and agencies and persons contacted as requested by the Board. A-5 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION - 1 vacancy. No recommendation has been received. A-14 - SECONDARY ROAD IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE - 3 vacancies - 1 new resume has been received. B-11 - SOLID WASTE TAW FORCE - no new resumes have been received. IMPACT: To maintain 100% membership on Commissioners' appointed Boards and Commissions. . .- ------ RECOMMENDATION: As the Board decides. ORANGE COUNTY 003 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM MEETING DATE FEBRUARY 4, 1985 SUBJECT: EFLAND SEWER DECISION ! DEPARTMENT: MANAGER'S OFFICE PUBLIC HEARING: . YES x NO . . . . . . ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: MANAGER'S OFFICE NO ext. 501 PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH - 732-8181 HILLSBOROUGH - 732-9361 CHAPEL HILL - 967-9251 MEBANE - 227-2031 DURHAM - 688-7331 PURPOSE: To consider whether sufficient conditions have been met for approval to be given to the Project. NEED: At its November 20, 1984 Regular Meeting the Board indicated the Project would be undertaken and funded by the. County if at least 179 persons, firms or. corRorations located in Phase I of the Project Area apply for connection and-S6Wer service for existing dwellings and business during the initial application period. As of January 31, 1985 the status of applications was as follows: 164 completed and notorized 13 complete except for needing signature of second spouse 4 complete except for needing signature of remaining church trustees or business partners Others have indicated a desire to sign prior to the February 4, 1985 Board Meeting or are seeking to resolve deed problems by that date. Residents of the Efland Community, media representatives who helped to inform the public, and staff headed by Albert Kittrell (Director of Housing and Community Development) are to be thanked for assisting in this application effort. IMPACT: If the System is built the County has agreed to appropriate annually to the operating revenues of the System operating budget the difference between annual expenditures and revenues received from user fees, investment and other income of the System. RECOMMENDATION(S): As the Board decides. MEIMENNUMENSIESsionamr... ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMiISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NO.E I Q MEETING OATS 2/4/85 064_ SUBJECT: Bid Award - Greenboxes for Sanitation Dept. DEPARTMENT: Purchasing & Central Services PUBLIC HEARING: YES x NO • ATTACHMENT(S) : No INFORMATION CONTACT: Rob Addelson ext 498 PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH _• 732-8181 HILLSBOROUGH - 732-9361 CHAPEL HILL - 967-9251 MEBANE 227-2031 i DURHAM - 688-7331 PURPOSE: Fdr::the Board to consider awarding a bid for the purchase of 18 8-yard greenboxes for installation at garbage pick-up sites around the County. NEED: The greenboxes are needed to replace the deteriorating boxes already in use. IMPACT: Two bids were received as follows: Sanco, Inc. - $502/box Total: $9,036.00 Kabco, Inc, - $504/box Total: $9,072.00 Funds are available in the budget of the Sanitation Dept. due to the purchase price.of the sanitation vehicle being under budget. RECOMMENDATION(S): . . • Award the bid to the low bidder, Kabco, Inc. of Raleigh, N. C. ORANGE COUNTY • 065 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NO.E11 MEETING DATE FEBRUARY 4, 1985 • SUBJECT: LEASE AMENDMENT - OLD POLICE BUILDING DEPARTMENT: MANAGER'S OFFICE PUBLIC HEARING: • YES x NO I ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: BILL LAWS ext. 503 • YES PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH - 732-8181 HILLSBOROUGH - 732-9361 CHAPEL HILL - 967-9251 MEBANE - 227-2031 DURHAM - 688-7331 - • PURPOSE: To consider amending the lease to add approximately eight hundred.and fifty feet of space in the court room for Job TrainingPartnership Act (JTPA) classrooms July 12, 1985 since our original lease expires 'on that date. NEED: The-diEtii earlier made space available for two classrooms at the Cedar Grove Multipurpose Center for class -instruction. However, the JTPA staff was unable to get enough participation at that location for the technical school to provide instruction. JTPA now requests space in the Old Police Building and is willing to pay the rent if the County would include the space under its lease with the Town of Chapel Hill. The lease amendment would be in effect until July 12, 1985 at which time all County leases of the building expire. IMPACT: No County cost-would result.Since only Orange County can lease the space an amendment must be approved. RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve the attached lease amendment. 1 066 , Lease Amendment • • This Lease Amendment (the "Second Amendment") to that certain Lease Agreement, dated August 6, 1982 and as further amended, (together, the "Lease"), by and between the Town of Chapel Hill, and Lessor (the "Town") and the County of Orange, as Lessee (the "County"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth below, the Town and the County agree as follows: 1 . . The Town also leases to the County, pursuant to the Lease and as , additional Leased Premises thereunder, in addition to the premises described in Paragraph 1.(a) of the Lease and the Amendments, the following additional premises: . The Court Room on the second floor of the Old Police Building, containing 850 square feet, more or less. 2. The lease of the additional premises described in Paragraph 1 of this Amendment shall commence on January 15, 1985, and shall extend through July 12, 1985. On and after January 15, 1985, all the terms of the Lease shall apply to the lease of such additional premises and such premises shall thereafter be deemed "Leased Premises." The rent therefor shall be as provided in Paragraph 2(b) of the Lease. This the day of , 1985. COUNTY OF ORANGE. By: Donal d Wi I hoi t Chairman, Orange County Board of Commissioners ATTEST Clerk to the Orange County Board of Commissioners Enommaismon. 1:,.•,' ' , i.., s, 0 6.7 • ,i- ..,., ,I.,... THE TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL . ,.g..., II.' • 3 4.- 1' • . - : BY • "..1.- P.- - ',till Joseph L. Nassif, Mayor :i.i. ATTEST ..., Nancy Wells, Town Clerk ,,i. . I7'. 1. This instrument has been•preaudited in the manner required by the Local Government Budget and Fiscal Control Act. ,,. . ,. ' . ti - Orange County Finance Officer '1 • t."1 Town of Chapel Hill Finance Officer tipit • 4 4 * :I■ I 1 i A F - 4 . ,,. , . , , ,,,. •- , . . . . . .4 '0 • 1• • 'i'l - . • . ii '1.-.W 1 .._ : . if: 068 . . , , . . . p,..„ . STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA . '.F.' COUNTY OF ORANGE q , t'r • This. is to certify that on. this day personally appeared before me , with whom I am personal ly acquainted, who ! - being by my duly sworn says that Donald Wilihoit is the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange and that she, 4 , f is the Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for • the County of Orange, a body politic and corporate, described in and .• which executed the foregoing Lease; that she knows the common seal of V : said County of Orange; that the seal affixed to said instrument is said t-, common .seal ; that the • name of the County of Orange was subscribed thereto by the said Chairman of the Board of Commissioners for the County of Orange and that the said Chairman of the Board of Commissioners for !..z the County of Orange subscribed their names thereto and said common seal 4 was affixed, all by and that said instrument is the act and deed of said County of Orange. - WITNESS my hand and notarial seal, this the day of I.'*. 1985. ii„, ., . - '' t Notary Public My Commission Expires: .; • STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA tr COUNTY OF ORANGE . . This is to certify that on this day personally appeared before me Nancy •r Wells, with whom I am personally acquainted, who being by me duly ft t • sworn says that Joseph L. Nassif is the Mayor of the Town of Chapel Hill and that she, Nancy Wells, is the Town Clerk, a body politic and corporate, described in and which executed the foregoing Lease; that she knows the common seal of said Town of Chapel Hill ; that the seal affixed ' to said instrument is said common seal ; that the name of the Town of Chapel Hill was subscribed thereto by the said Mayor of the Town of Chapel Hill and that the said Mayor of the Town of Chapel Hill and said Town Clerk subscribed their names thereto and said common seal was affixed, all by and that said instrument is the act and deed of said Town of Chapel Hill . , WITNESS my hand and notarial seal, this the day of t 1985. , . Notary Public ■ My Commission Expires: • ' . 1 0 69 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS • ACTION AGENDA ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM N0,41 • MEETING DATE- FEBRUARY 4, 1985 SUBJECT: PROPOSED WHITE CROSS FIRE DISTRICT DEPARTMENT: EMERGENCY SERVICES' PUBLIC HEARING: . YES x NO • r-----. ATTACHMENT(S): • INFORMATION CONTACT: Bobby Baker YES 732-8161, 929-8109 • PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH - 732-8181 . • HILLSBOROUGH 73Z9361 CHAPEL HILL - 967-9251 MEBANE - 227-2031 DURHAM - 688-7331 Or PURPOSE: To consider the petition requesting establishment of a fire district proposed to exist along the north of the Orange-Chatham countyline, south of the Orange GrOve .Fire District, east of the Orange-Alamance countyline; - and west of the South Orange Fire District (further described by attachment) and named the White Cross Fire District; and further, to consider calling an election in White Cross Fire District for the purpose of levying and collecting, a special tax for'the purpose of providing fire protection in said district. • NEED: To prdva!de fire protection to the property owners of this proposed • district. Protection currently provided on a volunteer basis by North Chatham, Eli Whitney, and Orange Grove-Eire Departments will be discontinued July 1, 1985. And, to provide a means for funding such protection by a special tax levy to be collected from the property owners within the proposed district. The 256 petitions received from residential free holders exceeded the 35% legal requirement. (There are 680 residential free holders.) • IMPACT: Would provide fire protection to the property owners of the proposed district; and would further consolidate. county-wide fire protection by 7 . approved method. • • RECOMMENDATION(S): That the Board approve the petition request from the residential freeholders and ask the County Board of Elections to set a date, time, and place to conduct an election within the proposed district. ..- NsP--e.' I ; , 7 U -- 4..... I G3- ,.-,. ,,, ag - 0 3 g ter -- •... ci .:. . ep• ., ... ,,.•-•.r.- . ,,- 4'• • 5 • .63 ''''t ,. • tViett i , _:‘ •.•1 ,----- no9 , i i§-v. il '.,,. - - i. ' tom &..1. . -.., .4‘ Z. •••lia IS AS • b .\14: %.• 0 1 1 . ..: .4 . . % - '5 hit / Q. .,,,,,,,•, . ...,,,,„ Zd . • 933. .. "IP- -4 si , • Wg .E.:71/ ./...".. M''' .A.k.,, '‘ *01 - ,{z; • .....11,...j,)14 11.0_i t.;k.-,,.:,N..4,,p:O.i a f.ik,::,.:\I t., ,......!(,.,,c 1,...,..7..2,:,',,...!,„,•a est,'g.•--.,.\*.-'--,.,-,. -, -•-.•;.i-'e.r,t k;1 4,.'-.,.•,-m • '2 r:-•-N..o:___ - i.. il .s1.4 e17r,,- -. : ;1•"1.,;':.0t4°P6.1,..4.,..-•::.,.•,':-'' '' . . •,., ' •-- - , • ' :!." •" -- 4 \ t• '*4 .+ 7,...„ .., . ..... . . mm . 5 ... . . j N i"-,4"'••1.11 s. s' .,26•a k...c'\.- ........ ...........I a .4. / ,0 , 1 A A MINDY*Illi Oft, \ '! m Or . 1 4 • __,..,.., 1061 . 0 ;....—.... . •-t-. o"'”' "...... . .. it , _, I , 'Sq.'::_ --.---;•••;:r . Ind A3AI te"'" '•--RGU•- - .- • - "1., -e46> e E , _ t .194i 8 m 8 • / 4.. 1 . na 1 i 314N-33a0*.- tv g 0 i "•,?‘.. I t :- -,-( • i ''...\ let: ..vs,i) to --e if! - .<.. . . P.."' . ..\ .... ,„ „- , --• • 1 . -- '1.. \ / .., • .. , •--':: 13,1 t. _..,.:4' 422 c '_.....,1) P -1 / .„ , awl ;:- . \ — 6)* . •'''•. ! I '- SOUD .14 0 1 .::: 10, c,Ok‘' N9SOOO't _ , /.--0 -• '---'1.......,,.,.....A ..Z. % ..-* ."" ?.-- s. -1• t . w 2-, • ( „....__ *•-ri-. .,- , -.. 04/ • . ., - • a - 41.,- ---""- • 1r. \ , \ 14‘ei a , .........,,r , ...---.7,-.,N 1---L„.., :. / k 4, i r_.... ... , .s. Sckyo , L. , r/ \ R \ .‘, \ /1/11 C .,,,s,,•• 41, . , on • v.), i (3 9 -,-, ....4,,b, ,...4:;;■.' oz' . ... /s6, .., ; , ' 4' . ( • I • A.:. / r .. az, taw / ) '''' III ' 14 - • C\ 8 / % ct .. S'el ■ I ) . ....- ._ . / .--) 1 )----< 6 411 ' /.. . •. Mk! 4 ,c7-,..„. • . P ,.. N .• - , 1,1 al3.......p,. I.alo .......••■•". . an - ./.--'s.•cr 0 VI P . I,J -Nt/b3 cz,' I.O . ... I- . . S. • ,--, • lips ... .._....„...,____,, ..„.. k . . . , , ,... ' . .....__ ___,... . .-,./Or : rthei) .. ■. .,, : J z ..... , a• / 4#.90 HINto moshwaa . • ...... ci ss.e/ \ &340-107fd.11•01314t3° 138 • ....„ ce 9 O K I , -. • _-- ' / , _ ..• •• . --. --„,. .• ) '- '', • 0 i6 () \- .... '•-,- ,, •':'...--. 0ae .-- •,,.„_ 5 a . ... 0 6 0 0 'N • V) O Z •Si - *...........Ai. . - ..Y 4 V e r le. • )t,,AS 1;C.j.. ,,..*:::' •(1 NmoinAoll . , , rA •/Op N /1 Vir If .... . . • ORANGE COUNTY 071 • BOARD'OF COMMISSIONERS ' ACTION AGENDA ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ' ITEM NO, E6 MEETING DATE February 4, 1985 • . . . . SUBJECT: Guidelines for Compiling the 1985-86 Annual Service Plan and Budget . . . . • DEPARTMENT:county Manager ' I i PUBLIC HEARING: . YES x NO . . -7-------, . • , ..........._ • ATTACHMENT(S) : • INFORMATION .CONTACT: Kenneth Thompson - 1985-86 Budget Calendar -' ' PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH. - 732-8181 • . HILLSBOROUGH - 732-9361 Annual Service Plan and Budget Prepare- CHAPEL HILL - 967-9251 Lion Manual (to be distributed at meet- . MEBANE - 227-2031 . • ing) - DURHAM - 688-7331 _ - . . . PURPOSE: To consider the calendar, guidelines and forms for-the budget process and • direct the Manager in any policy positions the Board may wish to be reflected . in the recommended budget. . _ . . . • . ' - • . . . • . . . . . • • . NEED: The Annual Service Plan and Budget Preparation Manual has been prepared to assist County departments and agencie6 in the preparation of their 1985-86 ' - FY requests. To properly evaluate the cost effectiveness of departmental programs, each department head will be asked to provide Program performance • • data. All changes from current level budgeting are to be justified by - - department heads. . . • , . • The Budget Work Sessions for the Board are scheduled to span the period from May 13, 1985 through June 7, 1985. • • _. • . . • . - - . The Public Hearing on the Budget and Revenue Sharing is scheduled for - June 3, 1985. • • ._ • ' . • • IMPACT: Board approval of the recommended calendar, service plan and preparation 0 - • manual, along with Board guidelines, will insure a timely beginning of . the 1985-86 budget preparation, and therefore, a timely completion of the budget process. . . . • . • • • . . RECOMMENDATION(S): As the Board decides. . . • ' - •,4-'' 072 • . -,, -,•:,; kr,:,, ,. t '.. ie, • ii•7 [ , • • j.: • . • . 1985-86 4. 0 BUDGET CALENDAR . . 4' : ' •..* COMPLETION PERSON DATE . RESPONSIBLE . . 1. Distribute Budget Preparation Manual and Calendar to Board. 2/04/85 County Manager , I 2. Issue Budget Guidelines; distribute Budget Manual, Personnel Detail, and 1/31/85 Revenue and and Expense ta Department Heads 2/08/85 County Manager Budget Office f1- ri g---, ,-. 44 I• 3. Meet with Chapel Hill-Carrbon)and Orange 2/13/85 County Schools' Superintendents and Finance Directors to discuss value base information, financial outlook, and status - Finance Director • County Manager/ : 0, I t PJ r•:,,i1 zu . ..k,, . 17 of capital planning. . . 0 • • 5■ • it,,, 4. Return "Personnel Detail" printdut to Per- sonnel Department (with corrections noted). t Submit "Request •for New Position or Reclass- Je: 1 ification of Existing Position" request to Personnel Department. 2/15/85 Department Heads ' i, •„. -..4 5. Return corrected "Personnel Detail" print- th,e, out to Department Heads. 3/01/85 Personnel Dept. • ,,,14:4- 0;IL 6. Submit "Departmental Revenue Up-Date" for . current year and "Estimated Departmental Revenue" for upcoming year to Budget Office 3/08/85 Department Heads VII 4,•,,,P' -I4 • t,-1 7. Submit revenue estimatee.,(using data furnished IP ; on 3/08/85 by Department Heads) to Manager. 3/15/85 Finance Director Al'' • 8. Submit 2 copies of completed Departmental, Agency, Department Heads, gd and Fire District Budget requests for fiscal year Agency Heads and kIA 1985-86 to Budget Office. 3/18/85 Fire Chiefs 04a VNiv 9. Review Budget Requests with Department Heads, 4/01/85- County Manager Agency Heads and Fire Chiefs. 4/16/85 XL: 0,:fli.c 10. Submit Superintendents' Preliminary School Orange County and NO Budgets 4/12/85 Chapel Hill-Carrboro;W Schools • e 4' 6,..•;LP 41•7r",''t`' ,'" . '41• q ...:• . 4.. If' UR' .................._ I1 0 7 3 I • . 1 . . 1985-86 Budget Calendar . Page 2 ;-. • rr. 11. Notify Department Heads, Agency Heads and County Manager t Fire ChiefS of Manager's Recommended Budget; compile Preliminary Budget. 4/26/85 . ,. -'... 12. Submit Manager's Recommended Budget to Board . - ? ' of Commissioners. 5/06/85 County Manager .t.' 11' t- 13. Decide dates for Board Work Sessions with County Manager Department Heads, Agency Heads, and Fire and ot Chiefs on Manager's Recommended Budget. 5/06/85 Board of Comm. 4: 14' '. 14. HOld Budget Work Sessions. 5/13/85 Board thru of 4 6/07/85 Commissioners . A. -.4 t•.:? xt 15. Hold Budget Work Sessions with Schools: 5/13/85 Board of Comm. Orange County 5/14/85 Board of Comm. "!trta, . ,...,.... Chapel Hill-Carrboro 16. Advertise Public Hearing on Budget and Revenue Sharing. • ,.-ii- 5/24/85 County Manager , :51 i. 17. Hold Public Hearing on Budget and Revenue i4 Sharing. 6/03/85 Board-oELComm::, r - 18. Complete revisions to Budget. 6/10/85 County Manager 19. Hold Board Meeting to adopt Budget, Tax Levy Board of and Resolution. 6/18/85 Commissioners • • 44' ., .‘•, •:: 1„ • • ,''•'''':1 . iiiiimgmem........ • • _ . V'• . 1 . • ORANGE COUNTY 074 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NO.FILI MEETING DATE February 4, 1985 • .., SUBJECT: Orange County Mileage Reimbursement Rate . 1 i ;Zr ' DEPARTMENT: Finance i PUBLIC HEARING: • YES x NO A , . . . . . . .. .., . • • . ' . ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: Wallace Harding ,. ... PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH - 732-8181 ' . HILLSBOROUGH - 732-9361 . cl CHAPEL HILL - 967-9251 MEBANE - 227-2031 , • DURHAM - 688-7331 4 ..._ . . _. .• . .t PURPOSE: To consider the current reimbursement rate of 22C per mile paid by the County to employees for the use of their personel cars on County business in view of the recent 'IRS ruling that mileage reimbursements to employees P in excess of 20.5c per mile is taxable income to the employee and that lic :.' employers must report the full reimbursement on a form W-2 wage and 0, tax statement to the U.S. IRS and N.C. Dept. of Revenue. t!' I. If 7■ 1 NEED: • ti,.. 1'.'', r.,. -'; IA!1 _I 4 1 . 1, P ■,, ' .4 *II.14 . :1r ■',i IMPACT: The impact on the County is minimal.County employees that receive reimbursement must file a form 2106 with their individual tax return 14 - to deduct the 20.5C. l. .. !1, . '..- ; . • ''',■i; RECOMMENDATION(S): Reduction of reimbursement rate from 22C to 20.5c and set ,,I A ,. future increases to follow IRS rate. ;., ' . -1- . . ORANGE COUNTY 075 ..: BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS • ACTION AGENDA r-,-, 11* ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NO.EFK MEETING DATE* FEBRUARY 4, 1985 S . ,-. . ' '1.'. SUBJECT: UNPAID REAL PROPERTY TAXES AND TAX LIEN ADVERTISEMENT ■ `.V.' DEPARTMENT: REVENUE . I f PUBLIC HEARING: -YES x NO , re' ATTACHMENT(S): NO INFORMATION CONTACT: &" PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH - 732-8181 HILLSBOROUGH - 732-9361 CHAPEL HILL - 967-9251 . MEBANE - 227-2031 •+I' DURHAM - 688-7331 ' S . ir. • PURPOSE: 1. To report the amount due on all current Real Property taxes as .6 of February 1, 1985. % 2. To recommend the dates for the Tax Lien.Advertisement. `(, ,.. rf: . NEED: Math ry per General Statute 105r;369 . ::•' The latest information on the amount of:unpaid taxes will be presented at the meeting. • i . 1 . , ■ IMPACT: • . . . , . . RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve the lien advertisement dates. mar.....--.. • - - • • BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA Ø7f • ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NO.lik MEETING DATE February 4, 1985 SUBJECT: TITLE III B GRANT RENEINML • ! DEPARTMENT: Department on Aging I PUBLIC HEARING: YES x NO ATTACHMENT(S) : Attachment B - INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry M. Passmore Specifications for FY86 Title Ext. 280 : • PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH' - 732-8181 Contract Services • HILLSBOROUGH - 732-9361 CHAPEL HILL - 967-9251 • MEBANE - 227-2031 DURHAM - 688-7331 • • • PURPOSE: To consider authorizing submission of the Title III-B Older Americana f Act (social services/senior center) application to Triangle J Council of Gov-. ernments by the County Manager, effective July 1, 1985 through June 30, 1986,. for federal and state funds in the amount of $83,669. Summary of proposed services due Feb. 4th and completed application by Feb. 28, 1985. NEED: This is a yearly continuation application covering the following services , which are a part of the Department on Aging's current budget: Transportation, • Senior Center Operation, Information/Referral, Chore-Handihelper and Case Management (In-Home/Community) . DoA would emphasize Access. services to faCill- , tate service delivery by a multitude of community organizations.. All services were ranked high priority according to COG needs assessment. Operaticin and staffing level would remain basically the same as this year, except with the part-time I & R Specialist position increased to full-time. This year's appli- cation will embody these important changes: (1) Performance Contrasting. • Performance based contracts will be required this year embodying specific service definitions, objectives, and units of service. The actual number of service units (trips, contacts, hours) provided will be the basis for payment. Attachment B - Specifications would be the service objectives proposed by COG for FY86 under contract. (2) Staff Changes. Senior Center - In order to meet - State and the National Performance Standards by 1986, the exiting Senior • Center Supervisors' time would be allocated 100% under center operations (rather the chore and I&R) . I&R - To improve DoA's ability to respond effec- tively and efficiently to increasing I&R demand, the part-time I&R Specialist .* position (20 hours) would be increased to full time with the transfer of 15% I&R time of the Center Supervisor. (3) Service Changes In-Home. To provide ' greater access to in-home care and community services to all older adults, DoA would (1) discontinue the Homemaker-Health Aide component in providing Aid ee and expand the case management service of the H-HHA coordinator plus transfer the chore-handihelper services to the coordinator. _ IMPACT - If approved, County funds would not increase other than possible staff merit raises for Title III-B contract. This would be accomplished by the above service/staff changes and requesting no equipment purchases. RECOMMENDATION(S) : Approval restklactitting the grant application:. ATTACHMENT 8: SPECIFICATIONS FOR FY 86 TITLE III CONTRACT SERVICES _ ORANGE COUNTY PERSONS: # Transportation IER Case Management Chore Senior Center ------------ - - --------------- ---------------;Pg-------- ------ 100 ------- - 1,,$00 ----- - % Well 30% 50% 109; 40% 60% -- % Mod. Imp. 60% 40% I 50% 35% % Frail 10%. 10% 80% 10% 5% UNITS # --------------A8.QQQ rips______ OQ,Sont,A-C.t-S ___kCA c,05e hours _$00 service hour - - --------------- % Well 30% 50% 10% 30% % Mod. Imp. 60% 40% 10% 50% % Frail 14% 10% 80% 20% f [ . . 078 ORANGE COUNTY , - ■ V-- BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA , ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NO. El'/ MEETING DATE- FEBRUARY 4, 1985 , . :1r SUBJECT: ANNUAL ACHIEVEMENT AWARD COMPETITION BY THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES. (NACoY DEPARTMENT: COUNTY MANAGER ' I PUBLIC HEARING: . YES x NO ATTACHMENT(S) : YES INFORMATION CONTACT: MANAGER'S OFFICE ext. 501 PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH - 732-8181 HILLSBOROUGH - 732-9361 •:' Pi CHAPEL HILL - 967-9251 .1; MEBANE - 227-2031 ij • ' . • DURHAM - 688-7331 , PURPOSE: To review and approve the program descriptions for the areas which the t' Board identified January 15,1985 for submittal. It . , i. NEED: DurliirEWe past year Orange County has undertaken several programs and acUvities which have resulted in improvement in management' and services.. They are eligible for entry into the NACo Awards Competition according to the 23 categories and 5 criteria used in the judging. Deadline for submission is February 8, 1985. Attached program descriptions have been compiled per the Board's. direction for the areas: , . 1. • Model Water Quality Protection Measures , . 2. PubiicHealth Dental'Screening in the Schools 3. Service Bureau for County-wide Data Processing • 4. Coordinate d Leisure Programming for Senior Citizens IMPACT: - , : -- 1 RECOMMENDATION(S): . _ , . ,.. - r 079 ........... :„.......,.:..:::,,:-.-i:r.4v, ...„6„...i,--,,,,-.-.r:,:ito.......,......ti.la.,...„..,,..*„......4,...,.........:;.. .4...:„:„..,,,:s,;.;,.. ...:,... 5„, r7.713grcr,4'3Ai2;f:A.:': :::Fltke,3:1:2:k?1,,,t,.*,..,..5-z, .44,7'... el+"::iiiCitA:::k3***M'-',:.3.,■S' ';:r4^.:.-"*41= -:Ailo ..r'lit,ter° i ..,-;i.,..teig., ,,:ii,,,,tv..#64,t401 ,r4-41.47pzi• - .:m,, . .. Ai ..,*-4. . -tv- - , -.4:0-..4.:*. ... ..-4.4•0`. .• - ....:4Ar. vv..;:..,.:?,..:,G;:nli-444..---1„...a,„ ..04.kw ,.....„-. ..-t...Pir, ,...W. „ _;, .,41::_..&••.*. .r..,,:w.t.410p4•44,..,36:t...1,ww- ..). .. ..: 1 ,.. ...::f..f.,,,;.4- .,,; .- ...•'1•:".*:,14,,,,040:;!:•&,,,,..).;. et..4x..t., ,,•,..$,,:frp..t:,,,,,,,,,,,.,:.*:...t;.,:g,.,„4:14-_, ,,..w.c.0.,,,,...4.4,;,•.e...,4 ,..,:r.2„.:‘,.mg,..., i ;.„., ,..,,,. . . . . • 1 COUNTY Orange STATE North Carol ina 81,200 $21,791 :845 • . POPULATION • ANNEAL COUNTY BUDGET ' TITLE OF PROGRAM TO BE CONSIDERED FOR ACHIEVEMENT"'MD: Model Water Quality Protection Measures • CATEGORIES: Entries must be made in the following categories. Check only ONE category for each entry 0 Community Development 0 Land Use and Land Planning : 0 Computerization • 0 Labor Issues and Employee Benefits I 0 Criminal Justice 0 Mental Health 0 Community Services El Media Relations • I 0 Counn-Administration and Management 0 Older Americans i D Drunken Driving Deterrence and Seat Belt Safety 0 Parks and Recreation , D Employment and Training 0 Public Safety/Emergency Management I la Energy and Environment [3 Rural Programs 1 0 Fiscal Management and Use of Federal or State Funds [3 Transportation . t 0 Health [3 Taxation and Finance , 0 Human Services 0\buth Programs i 0 Juvenile Justice . i NOTE: Our category list includes two general categories—Human Services and Community Services. We are looking for the following information under those categories. 1 • .1 .1 Human Services—food assistance programs;providing food/shelter for the homeless;programs to improve the service/administra- '4 tion of welfare or general assistance programs;quality control in welfare assistance programs;the provision of social services such as family counseling and child care; improvements in the management administration of human services programs. I Community Services—programs that make improvements in the county infrastructure,public services such as sanitation,fire, I police. etc. (innovations or improved services in any of these areas is acceptable); programs promoting the enhancement or betterment of the community;programs designed to give citizens more input into county government. : Name,title and mailing address of the count 's chief elect- Name, title, department, mailing address and phone 1 ed official—the county's board chair,president or elected number of program contact, a person able to provide 1 county executive—and his or her signature authorizing more information to inquiring jurisdictions: this entry: Name Mr. Don Wi I 1 hoi t Name Mr. Marvin Coll ins I Title Chair, Board of County Commissioners Title Planning Director • f Address 106 East Margaret Lane Department Planning City Hi 1 1 sbo rough State N.C. zip 27278 Address 106 East Margaret Lane Signature city H i lisborough State N.C. .Zip 27278 I Phone 919 / 732-8.181 - , , — L , PROBLEM/CONCERN: rs In 1988, Census figures indicated Orange County was one of the fastest growing counties in North Carolina with a growth rate of over 30%' Given the County's location with respect to the nationally prominent Research Triangle Park, and its central position in the developing Piedmont Crescent, a high growth rate was anticipated in the future. In fact, the population was projected to almost double, increasing from 77,055 in 1970 to over 140,000 by the year 2000. st While recognizing that growth would present many opportunities for the people of Orange County, officials were concerned that adequate planning must commence to insure orderly growth and necessary public services. This was particularly true regarding sufficient water supplies of good quality for the 6O^000 existing residents who relied on public water supply • systems. The County had depended almost exclusively on surface water impoundments for its water supply. Furthermore, the County's location in the headwaters of three major drainage st basins precluded major natural lakes and high volumes of water flow in its scresms. This characteristic, combined with severe water shortages in extended dry weather periods, established future water resources as a pressing issue within Orange County. Although water supply was a major issue, water quality emerged as an equal if not greater concern. Interest in the water qbal |ty issue had been increasing nationally, but concern on the local level was due more to the progressive attitude of the Board of County Commissioners. Its composition was such that the members' educational and occupational backgrounds gave - Lmpetus for the focus on water quality protection. Adeqaute water supplies were viewed as having negligible unless the quality of the soUrce was high. . • . SOLUTION: In March, 1979, the Orange County Board of Commissioners responded to the water resource issue and created a 16-member Water Resources Force comprised of university, governmental and water resources representatives. In its charge to the Task Force, the Board stressed • not only the need to identify existing and potential reservoir sites, but the importance of defining water quality goals, developing watershed protection measures, and incorporating each in the County's Land Use Plan. The charge was unique in that all too offten, attention had been focused on water supplies with little or no consideration given to protecting the sources from pollution. Water quality became as important an element as quantity. ' In May, 1981 , after two years of work, the Task Force presented its report to the Board of Commissioners. The heart of the report was a set of seventeen recommendations concerning water resources in the County. Six recommendations concerned water quantity, while eleven involved water quality. One additional recommendation was included later at the request of the Planning Board. The water quality recommendations included the following: Adopt a Land Use Plan identifying protected water supply watersheds. Adopt a Land Use Plan and associated regulations which preserve and enhance water quality in protected watersheds -�^ Encourage surrounding county/city jurisdictions to incorporate the Task Force recommendation Into their land use plans and development regulations Encourage local water authorities to adopt policies restricting water/sewer exten into protected watershedo. . Extend zoning coverage to protected water supply watersheds in applicable Townships. ./'"� Implement zoning/performance standards in protected watersheds. . , ; Adopt regulations requiring back-up on-site wastewater disposal systems in prntac— . " z watersheds. . . �� —m� — - ---- �0 � ^ `. vxx�-� -~~ At SOLUTION: Continued Require stream buffers along perennial streams in water supply watersheds. Adopt stormwater management measures applicable to protected watersheds. Continue administration of a strong ersoion/sediment control program. Develop a plan for dealing with hazardous material spills in water supply watersheds. Cooperate with Triangle J Council of Governments in the development and implementation of a regional watersbe6'�protectioo plan (Planning Board addition) . Approximately one year after the Task Force report was presented, the Board of County Commissioners adopted each of the twelve- recommendations regarding water quality as well as five of the six recommendations concerning water quantity. The sixth recommendation, .|mvolv|ng a regional -solution to water quantity probTems, had been addressed through requests to the N.C. 0ffica of Water Resources. The Board thus established the County's official policy for water resources and set the framework for implementation efforts to come. COUNTY ROLE: Orange County's role in the development and implementation of water quality protection measures has been that of facilitator and innovator. Given the diverse character of the County with its urban and rural settings, an "umbrella" was needed to bring together four separate water providers serving the Chapel Hill-Carrboro area, Hillsborough, Mebane and the west-central portion of the County. This was aCcomp1 /she6 through the Task Force approach, each entity having representation and a voice in the recommendations formulated in the report. Serving as staff to the Task Force was the Planning Department, expanded in 1979 for the purpose of updating the Land Use Plan. The Comprehensive Planning Division hot only provided data and technical assistance to the Task Force but provided the written draft of the report to the Board. Both Current and Comprehensive Planning Divisions of the Planning Department have continued since the inception of the Task Force, to provide professional asS|staoce in developing " innovative strategies and techniques related to the implemenetation of water quality protection measures. The efforts of the Commissioners as well as the staff have been recognized by the ' Triangle J Council of Governments in its regional programs and acknowledged as being 5~10 years ahead of surrounding jurisdictions in water quality protection. ' COSTS: Since 1979 the Board of County Commissioners, th ' - _ .""u" its annual budget �pprop c protection measures consistent with Board policies. Appropriations for the department Resources Task Force and insits continuing role in developing and implementing water L ty planning activities alone has increased from $105^580 in FY 1978-79 to $251 ,092 in ' 5 Additional funding for erosion control activities related to water quality p --e - — -'s- ` been provided, increasing from $28,921 to $92,000 between FY 1378-79 and FY 1984-85. • 082 RESULTS: • The significance of Orange County's efforts in the field of water quality protection is tgofold. First, the Commissioners were not content to adopt a policy statement but desired that concrete steps be taken to implement the policy. Second, actions in the field of water . protection statewide had been negligible. The Commissioners, through. their actions, set the precedent for other counties and municipalities statewide, developing standards and practices I which others have have copied or modelled. Since the inception of the Task Force and subsequent policy adoption, the Board of Commissioner have achieved the following: Incorporated the' Task Force recommendations into the countywide Land Use Plan, adopting the same in September, 1981 . Amended the Land Use Plan in separate actions in 1984 and 1985, creating "water quality critical areas" around existing/potential reservoir sites and achieving a higher protection level . Extended zoning coverage to a fifth Township in October, 1984, expanding water quality regulations to a third major watershed. Amended the Zoning Ordinance to include •maximum imperVtious:;aurfaeernatlo and stream - '-r requirements (1982); infiltration requirements, undisturbed area reg- at|ona" setback standard-. for septic tanks and structures, and industrial/hazardous waste storage provisions (1984);PW-| | Protected Watershed District (1982); WQCA Water Quality Critical Area and PW-I Watershed Industrial Districts(1984) . to Amended Zoning Atlas to apply WQCA district and accompanying regulations three watersheds (1984) Amended Erosion Control Ordinance in 1983 to provide stronger erosion control/stormwater management provisions in protected watersheds and appropriated S24^800 for additional personnel/equipment to a6m)nlyter. Adopted standard Procedure (through Health Department) of verifying existence of back-up on-site wastewater disposal site in protected watersheds as part of initial site work. Initiated(through Soil Conservation Service) a program of techhFdeJ 'and financial assistance for farmers who utilize "best management practices" in protected watersheds. Adopted a policy (through Orange Water and Sewer Authority initiative) of restricting water/sewer extensions into protected watersheds except in emergency situations. Policy further enforced through zoning/subdivision procedures. ' Commjsioners, advisory board members and staff have served on the Triangle Water Resources Committees since 1982, providing technical assistance in regional water quality offorts. Testimony provided-to. N'X'0epartment of Natural Resources regarding initiatives to protect regional reservoirs of Falls of Neuse and Jordan Lakes. Efforts have resulted in Town of Carrboro preparing and adopting water quality regulations /1983) and Chatham Codnty�end Durham City drafting ordinance provisions addressing water quality considerations. CONTACT: Mr, Marvin Collins • Planning Director • Orange County Planning Department 106 East Margaret Lane Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 • [ � (919) 732-8181 Extension 346 ./ |' • ° • . -- , • . . . . . .,, O83 • • • . - . . . t . , • • • . . . . .. . rg5---,,,--4.7.---57.--,,--,.,:•-,-,-,.-....,, - ,--,,,,,-'....'i,k9'*f.ii:e4a,'"--.'","VA:: :-'.":..-. .f-,' - 'f, w:-_-_,...-i.:r-.:- .,,""----,-K--;,,,,--=,-. .,....,",_-..- ,.--wil., • 1"f:Z±:%.17P 4,-;-'74''?7:-V- 11'i"*.:5--1Sql ':*-^0:"C-.4=:'2$'■:.T.VIrel:::ii . .z:?,-t"n.,,al. 0:D al ' F4'34',;.'?:41i,-,-",A....4-Zdafi.L:r`..7•4:14.4:2P1,45:40.3., ,V1.,pkt.r:p1:37i.,..i....1 • ., , -.;.`"Zke.1/2"-*-$.6f114:■-;■;342.-"Ikt"Vietter'''''?r+t,c., 1'...M-43-L,.g.11.:"- 7,- ,4....1.....kt,...,pe',._,..• , '•••••.....--:-Z. ..., .'.■:'-';',441.1.4e:::`Seey.5.1-4.:150S:fft1+412:16.7'.P15E.N7..a. :57,Yil'Ii • • .'4'rl .,;!'"''..".:..7 2-7:-..`.'""..'.....Z",..4.1..1r,',,/,':......,,,....Vt-,s..-.7%;14.',,.....-,..;,:-■=% -..fil .r.,171`,Y-•-:47.....4:1,,---;:-....?,,re-, 27‘......-r.i:::::.:4L-:,7,;.•; ...,.......... ......•.-.7, -,,'-.In:.,..,;,..-_. ,-„,........._:.,.,,....'0. • . . • ; . . • . • • . . . . .. . . • . -••- • . . . • , • . . • . • • COUNT Orenge . . . • • .. slug North Carona Y • Carolina • - r,. OPULAIION • 79 p661 . .. ANNuAL.COUNTY BUDGET • .. .. • _ . . . • . . . TITLE OF PROGRAM TO BE CONSIDERED FOR ACIiIEVENIENT AWARD: . " • • ' . • . • -Pub lic Health..Dental. Screening in th e Schools • . • • • . . . ' . . . - - . - • - . . . • - • . - _ . . . . • • . , . • - . . • • , . . . • . • • CATEGORIES: Entries inust.be Made in the following categories. CheckOnly ONE category for each entry. • •. • . • 0 Community Development • •' 0 Land.Use and Land Planning • . . . . • 0 Computerization 0 Labor Issues and Employee Benefits . .0 Criminal Justice . .• • . 0 Mental Health . • 0 Community Services. 0 Media Relations . . . 0 County Atlininistration and Management • . 0 Older Americans . . 0 Drunken Driving Deterrence•and Seat Belt Safety 0 Parks and Recreation 0 Employment and Training •• . 0 Public Safety/Emergency Management , . 0 Energy and Environment .. • - • 0 Rural Programs . 0 Fiscal Management and.Use of Federal or State Funds 0 Transportation. • gg Health . . 0 Taxation and Finance • • • ' • 0 Human Services . . 0 Youth Programs . 0 Juvenile Justice . • . • • . . . • • • . . . . . .. • . . , are NOTE; Our category list includes two general categories--:-Hunian Services and Community Services..We are looking for the • • following information under those categories,. ' • • . . . , • . , - . , . . • . . • Human Services—food assistance-programs:providing food/shelter for the homeless;programs to improve the service/administra- tion of welfare or general assistance programs;quality control in welfare assistance programs;the provision of social services such as family counseling and child care; improvements in the management/administration of human services programs.. • • • . • . Community ServicesL-programs that make improvements in the county's infrastructure,public services such as sanitation,fire, police, etc. (innovations or improved services in any of these areas is acceptable);programs promoting the enhancement or . . betterment'of the community;programs designed'to give citizens more input into county government. . . ' • . . . Name,.titte and mailing address of the county's chief elect- Name, title, department; mailing address and phone , ed official—the county s board chair,president-or elected. number of program contact, a person able to provide county executive—and his or her signature authorizing more information to inquiring jurisdictions: this entr■-: . . • ' - • •• • • . . • • Name Donald Willhoit, Chairman- - Name Katherine K.. Glassock., PHN' . . • • Toe 'Otange County Commis sioners- Title School 'Health Coordinator • . • . Address 106. East Margaret Lane Department Orange County Health Department • • . City. Hi llsb or oughstate NC Zip 27278 Address 300 W. Tryon Street ' • ...... • City Hillsborough. State NC zip 27278 Signature . .i?•••.:• ' Phone (9 19,) 732r9361, ext. 305 • .•,...',4i• . •.. • ,s..- • •-4. • . . • • . .4:z.;:.,_ ,•,-.', S . . ' • ■ 0 8 4 trO" vW1 PROBLEM/CONCERN: • A dental screening/referral project was developed as a joint effort between the Orange County Health Department school nurses and supervised dental hygiene students from the University of North Carolina School of Dentistry. With parental permission, children in grades K, 2, 4 and 6 of the local public schools were screened. Children needing dental treatments were referred for care. Up to 1981, the school nurses were solely responsible for follow-up of referred children, but other duties often precluded adequate time for follow-up. In 1982, the UNC dental hygiene students began working in teams with school nurses to provide follow-up of dental referrals. The results of this collaborative effort was an increase in the compliance rate for securing dental health care of referred children. The compliance rate increased from 51% in 1981 to 77% in 1984 among the targeted schools. In addition to the benefits to children, the dental hygiene students received a valuable community experience and the school nurses were able to assure adequate and timely follow-up of referrals without sacrificing time from other school health activities. The program continues to date and has incurred no extraordinary costs. SOLUTION: - - The Orange County Health Department's School Health Coordinator met Ifith the UNC-CH Dental Hygiene Student Supervisor to design a plan that would involve the dental hygiene students in the follow-up component of the dental screening/referral, program. It was believed that the joint efforts of the public health nurse teamed with a. dental hygiene student in following up referrals would increase the number of children obtaining needed dental care. In 1982, dental hygiene students were assigned to-public health nurses to work on follow-up for three hours/week for 6 weeks. The number of students and the times assigned for follow-up are arranged each year by the School Health Coordinator and the Student Supervisor' in the Dental School. The criteria for determining which schools receive a rrarse-student team are the numbers of children referred and low compliance rates from the predeeding year. Com- pliance rate is defined as the number of children who have obtained care divided by the number of children referred. Obtained care has been recorded as a child having an appoint- ment with a dentist. - : • .085 • -1AN:10pia, . - ; - - soLLTION: Continued Public health nurses have supervised, the students' follow-up activities which have included: 1. tabulating parental responses from referral letters 2. contacting parents by phone, letter and/or home visits 3. talking with teachers about students' dental needs 4. identifying community resources for obtaining dental care 5. arranging for School Health Funds for parents in need of financial assistance 6, arranging transportation with home/school coordinators to dental. providers. Students have kept daily logs of their activities with plans and outcomes noted. Public health nurses reviewed the logs weekly to monitor progress and results. Evaluation of the follow-up program has been obtained by comparing compliance rates . each year, starting with the 1981 rates (when public health nurses conducted all follow-up activities). Subjective evaluation has also been obtained through written reports of nurses and students. CDUNTY R.OLE: • The Orange County Health Department's role in the Dental Screeniim and Follow-up program has consisted of: 1. Identifying the problem of low compliance among children referred for dental care and the relationship of follow-up. 2. Initiating the development of a program to involve dental hygiene students with public health nurses in the follow-up component of the dental screenings. • 3. Jointly planning, sponsoring and supervising the follow-up program with the Dental Hygiene Student Supervisor. 4. Providing training of dental hygiene students in referral/follow-up techniques, communication and documentation. 5. Introducing students to the school/community settings . 6. Coordinating/organizing the screenings, referral and follow-up. 7. Providing facilities and support for follow-up activities (access to telephones, office space, etc.) 8. Serving as a referral resource for dental care of referred children and providing some financial assistance for care of referred children (school health funds) in the Orange County Health Department Dental Clinic. CO' There were no extra expenditures incurred by the program, except for the e4kra:st me spent by the School Health Coordinator in planning and coordination of the program.) Funding for the screenings come from School Health and Dental Health budget of the< Health Department, which are state and local funding. --- •.l i.?• .. •r3..r•! _y-4a• t '�IJ�r4 : .�,-Yfif t '��-.�yc• stsa?_ •[+�.C^? t -. ,•,•' -f {..• •,C:AP.'q±':: !•,.e•r f.ry'.•.:.f.. ,",64.NS",: (�c/�_:�j�.MIN*,. ��ll1C a - - rF rr!••...��.•••••• '� fir%^#,.' ,t"i+i�,c '=VY .. ' ;'•'"1�•�.-1n �, lh�r''•`�" ,��i,,:.:�...t�;y '��.. - �4'Y/.��Y; .�1 ' �T._ ;af�.. _ :�t -..Y• �Vj• .y. • at:;—'?"'a•-.''Ys- >-:�"•..: '" -,.i. :-3.:- '., -cx n? :w4•,•.�y?4...;�ti -^...,,y,.,:..� - .5•i.,,_w'.. h > -�f:;• _.• ,�.. _ 1r- ., a_:.. •y .� _4; •,'...,;;c;i&;. .:: : �.r...i '''.?p:;;3,x-•c'F-27t-.:',2�;.:.•a..:.ir '-.•` :,i-{�-g ,. :.-.:_,_x,-^.:--'':v 'i3�_" --••.'1,:':.t..:" r � 't• �g� �r��1 :::.:.•,„.." t : .•iOrri�lili Ili: 1981',;•the.average` compliance rate- of� ,ch.Idren'referred"for'.care 'for''dental` pry ":''' .., ,h-l:ems...was.•• '51y'. 'At':'that.cime,..,pubIic health nurses were',rests'onsible•..for.•the::follow-up-:air • `:referrals.' In- 1982 -the. average compliance-•rate for.sch'ools 'with student/•.nurse teams, • " fa'llowing-up:,referrals rose' to•.78t.. In 19843 the compliance 'rate''among; targeted,schools rece.ving',student/nurse team'follow�-up ways 77Z'. 'Broth 'students. and: nurses concur .that 'these%•' lxxgher• compliance.rates, are clue` to- the student involvement' in•follow-up. • The students-have, '.•teen ab-1`e to;'conduet•more:time.Ty'. andC intensive .follow-�up .oil =eferrala're'suIttn ::i n mo :- i:..-c.lildrei�:.recei-vi:na:care-. . Zhe.stade�xts. have•benefited: from. the program:'by' 'gea:nLng'e'xgerzettce ., a c amEuauty'..sett n and by`c eveiop.ng..stronger 'communication' and. proM olving`: '- t .. •,r.. t eAlS. sIGZ•- :::.6w { -Tb. rough•'and"snccessfzi3: fat a -uli•is 'ai.ta•L. to-thy:success 'of. any' screeni xg::program. .: : i~'.The:'i• terdlsciplinery.'approach utrli'aing- Dental. HygY.ene students``aim>.publzc heal:tli°,nurses. �, .£'.iwu teau• ,for.Moll increase ow-�sipt:xn,. argeCecl',s'ettaols bras-'resinted'.'i °as:.xaeraase.'zn_;f i►e`aumbev .of>• ' `�'''•r children obtaining: needed dental•case.:-..Such'-an intardiscipls.nary-.•appproach� 'serve es f,.,... n°model for other public healthfach'ool health programs with. s.imi:lar 'resources. ;:. = '.' t� : 1, *•tv ::::;:'-'....4,..:1•7.;;;‘'....'..""*,, 1 . .L. +�. J. .�J is -• iZ CONTACT.. . • " Katherine K. Classock , - , `; . 'S.chool Health. Coordinator . '. . ', _, Orange. County Health Department 300 W'•,.`•Tryon' Street: r4' "Hillsborough, NC 27278... '' Te•rephone: '(919) 732-9361, ext. 305 • .. W 087 Dental Screening in the Schools: A Collaborative Approach Katherine K. Glassock, P.H.N. /I , B.S. School Health Coordinator Orange County Health Department 300 West Tryon Street Hillsborough, North Carolina 2.7278 Zan Carlton Holland, R.D.H. , M.S. Assistant Professor Curriculum for Dental Hygiene 405 Brauer Hall 211H University of North Carolina School of Dentistry Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514 r . 088 Dental Screening in the Schools: A Collaborative Approach • • Screening and referral in grades k,2,4, and 6 for dental problems is an integral part of the dental health program in the schools of Orange County, North Carolina. Since 1980, the program, funded by • a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, has been conducted. through the joint efforts of the Orange County Health Department (OCHD) and the School of' Dentistry at The University of North Carolina. at Chapel Hill (UNC-CH) . Dental hygiene students from UNC-CH, supervised by faculty, conduct visual, examinations of the Children's teeth and gingiva' in- the school setting. Parents were notified of the. results by letter.. Public health nurses assigned to each school were responsible for follow-up on those children referred for dental care. • • Problem: Large numbers of children. with dental problems were identified by the screening program. However, public health nurses' involve- ment in other school health activities precluded their ability to devote sufficient time to the follow-up component. As a result, the numbers of children obtaining care were lower than expected.. Purpose: The OCHD School Health Coordinator and the UNC-CH Dental Hygiene Student Supervisor devised a plan to involve dental hygiene students in the follow-up component of the screening/referral program. It was hypothesized that the combined efforts of the, nurse and hygiene student would increase the number of children who obtained needed dental care. This collaborative effort was a new approach. to the problem.. Methods: A total of 8 students specializing in Dental. Public Health were assigned to public health nurses to work on follow-up in 1982 for ' • • three hours/week for 6 weeks. : Criteria used to determine which . schools received a student-nurse team were numbers. of children refarrecIand law compliance rates in 1981 when only. nurses. were conducting follow-up. Compliance rate was defined as the number of children who obtained care divided by the number of children referred. Obtained care was recorded_ as a child having an appoint- ment with a dentist. The public health nurses were responsible for supervising the . student's follow-up activities. Follow-up included: 1. tabulating parental responses from referral letters 2 . contacting parents by phone, letter and/or home visits 3. talking with teachers about students.' dental needs 4. identifying community resources for obtaining dental care 5- arranging for School Health Funds for parents in need of financial assistance 6- arranging transportation with home/school coordinators to dental providers 089 -------. Students kept a- daily log of their activities with plans and, outcomes noted. Logs were reviewed by nurses weekly to monitor progress and obtain results. Evaluation of this approach was obtained objectively by comparing compliance rates from 1981 and 1982. A subjective evaluation was also obtained through written reports from nurses and students. Results Table I shows that seven out of eight schools with a student/ nurse team increased compliance rates in 1982. Numbers of children referred for dental problems both years were similar. Table I Comparison of Compliance Rates* for Screening Follow-up in Orange County Schools, 1981 and 1982. School 1981 1982 A 28% 92% 39% 72% C 39% 90% D 52% 100% 55% 80% F . 65% 52% 67% 75% 61%" 64% Average for all Schools 51% 78% * Compliance rate # of children referred who, obtained care = of children referred Subjective evaluation revealed that both students and' nurses agreed that the higher compliance rates in 1982 were due to student involvement in follow-up. Students reported that they enjoyed working in the community and as a result felt more confident about their communication and problem-solving skills. Nurses felt the- experience - was beneficial because students conducted a more timely and intensive follow-up on referrals resulting in more children obtaining care. The team approach was well-liked by both groups. They unanimously recommended the program be continued as a joint effort. Conclusion Involvement of dental hygiene students in the follow-up component of the screening/referral program in Orange County, N.C. dramatically - increased the number of children obtaining needed dental care. A thorough and successful follow-up is essential to the usefulness of any screening program. The interdisciplinary approach described is a model for other school health programs with similar resources. DENTAL STATISTICS '94 - '05 Chapel Still/Carrboro City Schools School Population to # Screened a Screened # Referred to a Referred Out of be screened School %6 Secured Care tC 2 4 6 Nurse Seawall 237 110 46% 17 15% 17 100%6 FPGrehem 247 161 65% 41 0� 25% 35 85%6 Estes Z84 208 73°6 34 16%6 25 74°6 Ephesus 235 129 55,0% 8 6%6 8 100,°0' Cerrboro 281 214 76% 51 24%6 39 76%6 Glenwood 242 150 62% 17 Il%6 16 94%6 TOTAL 1526 970 64°6 167 17% I40. 84%6 Orange County Schools Cam Park 3O3 255 84,0% 57 22,,°6 49 86°o Grady tar. 338 . 267 79%' Be 33% 64 73.w 0 Central 180 166 88% 47 28% 33 7O°d Efl and- Cheeks 259 208 80% 60 29%6 54 90/a Stenback 392 329 % 8 2,0 . 60 19%6 36 64%6 TOTAL 1401 1216 82°6 3[18 25 0 236 77%6 COMPOSITE TOTALS 3007 2486 73% 475 22% 376 79%S O cc d 091 • . . -.: .^.�.:-•.� �v-�-- S--:-�-•-�';-,-�.,,,�_ C � V<. qtr:•- `.?•i5 D" rf It `l' V f �. _w.....t s ...xY::.•.. .. ';:tta::d:Fi:ancx:yi. ,,,4•' ' -.fa`.r,:;l ;.;f:sGi.+: : t,:ia-�4. ,- COL'NTY...—ORANGE sin North Carolina•POP 7A('1ON 79,661 ANNUAL COl'NT5' I3uDGI T 22 million • TI'll.E OF PROGRAM TO BE CONSIDERED FOR ACHIEVEMENT AVARD:' . County-wide Computerization • CATEGORIES: Entries must be made in the following categories. Check only ONE category for each entry ❑Community Development ❑Land Use and Land Planning El Computerization • ❑Labor issues and Employee Benefits ❑Criminal Justice ❑Mental I Iralth ❑Community Services . licdia Relations ❑County Administratio and Management . - 0 Older Americans if .❑ Drunken Drit-ing Deterrence and Seat Belt Safety ❑Rtrka and Recreation ❑ Employment and Training ❑Public Safety/Emergency Management ' ' ❑ Energy and Environment ❑Rural Programs • ❑Fiscal .Management and Use of Federal or State Funds 0 Transportation - • ❑Health ' ❑Taxation and Finance • - ❑ Human Services p Youth Programs • • ❑Juvenile Justice - • NOTE: Our category list includes two general categories—Humim Services and Community Services. 'We are looking for the following information under those categories. Human Services—food assistance programs;providing food/shelter for the homeless;programs to improve the serrice%administra- tion of welfare or•general assistance programs;quality control in welfare assistance programs;the provision of social services such as family counseling and child care; improvements in the management/administration of human services programs. Community services--programs that make improvements in the county's infrastructure,public services such as sanitation,fire, ' police, etc. (innovations or improved services in any of these areas is acceptable);programs promoting the enhancement or _ betterment of the community; programs designed to give citizens more input into county government. Name,title and mailing address of the county's chief elect- Name, title, department, mailing address and phone ed official—the count 's board chair,president or elected number of program contact, a person able to provide county executive---and his or her signature authorizing more information to inquiring jurisdictions: this entry: Name Name R_ Keith Brooks Title____ Title Data ProrcSsing Manager Address Department Data Proc s ing .City ' State Zip Address 208 S Cameron St. r. Signature - CityEillsborough State N.C. Zip 27278 . .Plume •919 / 732 8181 - l`r. • ...•y : /.Y ‘,1 092 • . %.•. 9 ••,w 1.. ,* - s . .:•..:'.:'''.':.''1.• 't,•;.:....1....:::',.;'..;,::''..'','.'"-..."'-f-;':,,:;:-•:.:7';,: ;-;-1-le!',..",'P-i"...:,::;.'. :;:;•":::;''''.........-ct•';.%:;:-".. •;••'.7 WORY4';:l ' . " ::-.., 1,1" (.. ,....,....•,•. •,--.•-...,-.4..:,i‹,.,:•;-,,:_-,.., ---,I,.-;.;..,.•:••-,•;•,-4":......i-7/..i. -...,,:,..::. 4.:i;;;.:.'•:,1.':I.:-'••..';-::•''„y,..... .."::,,'1: :;..,-',•••,..,•.:.:4:'•,,,,•-2•,.,•:•-::.:, ...••.1., ,!,,.1,..,; ,t ' 6.„,::-....o.:.z.,—..`,.1,4V-::.tv.;.,....r..:".....4.4,1, 1- t-,-..4 ", ,..k,.--7.x.—ii:..u,L.A.:-.4-.11.,...2.:.4e2,Z.,c,:. :4-74e4W`,,.-1.5.K.,Lr;':,7.r.it2.1*,:,..tai:. .-:'... .(;,-;-:";:,•.1,,,;:.,N•';,*, I- q, PIZOBLEMICONCERN: . 4- . . , In 1977 Orange County was basically a manual county with no in-house computer equipment or expertise. The county was spending over ninty thousand dollars ($90,000) with an ,.., outside service bureau for outdated, and in most cases, very ' untimely computer services. Orange county was growing very rapidly and its workforce was being expanced by the addition of new county functions. Entire new departments such as v ‘•:. Planning, Public Health, and Recreation were being added. The top officials of the county decided to add its own computer staff and equipment to help manage and control .. ,, these expanded functions This decision was supported by an •-‘;, . outside agency, doing a feasibility study on the problem. %q that recommended the 'county develop its own in-house computer department. The priorities of this department V would be to help gather, maintain, and disseminate the - c information being generated by the rapid growth in local • 1 government functions. . %4 .,. soLunom - . .. . • . .oc • The county funded a Data Processing department in the 1977-78 budget. A data processing manager was hired whose 1.,.,,":,,,,ilt: primary initial function was to acquire equipment and staff to meet a five year data processing development plan. This plan was developed by a steering committee which consisted ' of the County Manager and several top department heads. The decision was made to purchase the basic application software • so as to get the top priority systems up and going in a very short time frame. The first equipment was installed in February of 1978 with the functions of Finance, Tax, Board of Elections, and Register of Deeds in operation by July of • . '?: that year. All the objectives of the five year plan were 1- , completed in thirty months by developing in-house .4 application software or by purchasing outside existing software packages. The outstanding cooperation between the • data processing staff and other departments in the county resulted in excellent computerized systems being installed. Each department was totally involved in either developing or ' 1 purchasing the application software which was to be fi,,,,...,...-; , •. 4 --.1 installed for their use. , • ...•...f. ' ____:...7:::\1;.....• ,..1.111 !,,;0,1,1, 0•9 3 _ • • • • . • • •. , _ S.`" • • : :i01,UTION: Continued • • • • • • . . • • • . - • • • • • • COUNTY ROLE: • • The county provided the funding to hire a staff of three data processing professionals and to purchase the necessary equipment to meet the objectives. A fourth staff position was added in the third year. Other county department heads committed themselves and their staff to work very closely with the data processing personnel in selecting or designing actual software to be used in their day-to-day operations. The decision was made to go with state-of-the-art, on-line, integrated systems and equipment. All systems had one primary goal, they had to be usable on a day-by-day basis and had to assist in the day-to-day functions of the user department in storing and maintaining the data used on a daily basis. The county budgeted $50,000 in 1977-78 and from $160,000 to $225,000 per year in subsequent years. The data COSTS: processing budget is less than one percent of the total county budget. Approximately $95,000 was received from BUD in 1979-80 in a grant to improve land records in the county • and $3,000 to $6,000 has been received each subsequent year - from the North Carolina land records program. . . - • . . , • . . 094' • •,, , ,-----777,,,,,,,,,,..„-,,,,,,......e.grtvtzuM**.v”....,rx-.-,,.-r.n-rtItt-TMI.T.E,.. ....pr- lt-,-,....—,-.7m1.1-717.7,e's4Tr-r-- .r.:.-:,;..??..;.. .-*I...r.v.7...!,,•,-I'vVrtr).".....„, .■ . . -;:....;-",.:";.:.■:•V.:..:::'*...,.1.'.:"7:::,.:':7,....:-..i Y s'::,..:;,...":il.P-4 et K.4,01f,;11 it:VJ:-*.fi1 L 1,1‘jii 1 At 3,-il rk):......". :::.--%'..cl-''''. -.:.::......f..--..': '.:•.,..*:,-:':*.---:--....::::;-.1.:(: i c. -".;1.;.:-:;:f.::::7,-,...,___;.--:'r-?7.-!.t'.'e.**-......1":-::-.;':.,':Z:-.....:.-:::'.; :.."....f.•.:!;-":7.7:r.i.--..;.'•=:::.::'-"I.C.■-;-- - ,,...:x......1.,,,I.. .4.16...,,:.,-:P,',,,,,te;;;;:eii,,11...-:`-;.t-t-,-,•:,4.:::..,.,-....--izt):*4 ,i-f:21'4*.aiz«.4 ,1-,-...:-Ard......41;z:ii.Ala.-.1.-41.::::::.s.",/ *.-IL.:... ',..:4..A.4.*A.:Lai.,7,--,-:q`---J2'4,:::',,,t:4-.4z':.,:.... ,- FaS,IJIMS: . - The county has currently computerized all major county departments and is recognized in the state as one of. the top computer operations. We have had numerous national and international visitors to look at our.land records and tax '. systems. Several of our systems have been transferred to other counties in North Carolina. Our tax revaluation , system was sold to a third party and is being marketed nationally and is currently installed in over twenty ' locations. Actual cost savings are hard to identify. We do . . feel the general computerization of the county has resulted in substantial cost avoidance and vast improvments in the handling of information on a county wide basis. The county is providing data processing services to other local , governmental units in the county on a cost sharing basis. This is currently being used by the three towns located in the county and has reduced their computer costs as well as :, improved their service. The Orange County School Board and . the Orange County Clerk of Courts is also using this service for selected applications. , • • CONTACT: R. Keith Brooks, Data Processing Manager . . 208 South Cameron Street Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 . 919 732-8181 Ext. 477 . ' t • , I : 'CI 9 5 • .+�:d•ivir_ �e.� may'' y _ .y• - t ,{ 5`1 +1 . Cot•i`:1Y Orange North Carolina POPI'l_\T1ON 79000 ' TITLE OF PROGRAI\t TO BE CONSIDEREI) FOR AC!!IEVENIE\T:\\CARD: • Coordinated Leisure Programming for Senior Citizens I , • • ' CATEGORIES: Entries must be made in the following categories. Check only ONE category for each envy ❑ Community Development ❑Land Use. and Land Planning ❑ Computerization ❑ labor Issues and Employer Benefits ra ❑ Criminal Justice c ❑Mental Health ❑ Commentity Services ❑ Media Relations • . ❑ County Administration and Management [RJ Older Americans ❑ Drunken Driving Deterrence and Seat Belt Safety ❑ Parks and Recreation • ❑ Employment and Training ❑ Public S:tii:ty1l?nter gencv Management ❑ Energy and Environment - El Rural Programs ❑ Fiscal Management and Use of Federal or Stare Funds ❑ 'lransporrition ❑ !to altit ❑Taxationi and Finance ❑ Human Services ❑ linah Programs ❑juvenile justice • • - • E. NOTE: Our category list includes two general categories--f lum:ut Services and Community Services. 't are looking for the following information under those; categories. Human Services—food as sistance prog rams;prockling fin shelter fur the homeless:programs 1 r ants to improve the set,•icc/ndrninistra- tion of welfare or general assistance programs;quality control in welfare assistance programs;the provision of social services such as family counseling and child care; improvements in the m:at;i,e•,nenCadntinistrarion of human services programs, Community Services—programs that make improvements in the county's infrastructure, public services such as sanitation,fire, police, etc. (innovations or improved services in any of these areas is acceptable); programs promoting the enhancement or • • betterment of the community; programs designed to give citizens more input into county government. Name,title and mailing address of the county's chief elect- Name, title, department, mailing address and phone ed official—the county's hoard chair;president or elected number of program contact, a person able to provide county executive—and his or her signature authorizing more information to inquiring jUrisdictions: this entry: Name Don Wil].hoit Jerry M Passmare Name Y Title Chair, County Commissioners Director Address 106 East Margaret Lane Department on Aging City Hi 11 sbo rou lie Pl. C. 7.i1) 27278 Address 300 W. Tryon Street Signature Fitt Hillsborough . tate r� C .zi 27278 p • Phone 919 / 732-8181 , Ext . 280 • • „ ,,ik, -,,,i • . 096 \ . • ‘, .•....„„..„--,....„.„.„.-,-.7„.....„,...-....„--„„•,.,.,.,..,..:•...,..„........„,,,,,:_•••,.........,...,...... _ ..• .„ . - .. - ...- -• ... .-.:. .•: 3,..,... ,. t d ';.1,i.';'.iii ( ZS. i',7, „,. - • , .. , ...,.. .,. ,rt.,,...,,, ..7. . -,• :.,-,:,-.--. 7...1.... '-! .`•_,....; .... 't•••: -1.-:•-•:7-.• •' ---, Li, .... . . •. • . . ...,....- ... . ,04,-,i..v.i,INISI: Ni....iktIM.:N... pL - ' %:•' • ; :':•;.s. '*•.•-;'. *:V': .. ,'; - •• moiremyge....,.71\ . ”.'' :':"".....• . ...;----iXti:■:7 :4•43 •Za2=.;:a.:::1:di'.••• •••.'41.,4:1..1 -4:14i7.11•64U.'''•''''• •t`I''','...Za.72....* "':;;Z:o.ts'ealitna'"-04•L'.•.:AVZilila*. '''"'''.4'er"c'•."'•i6'••.a.ik:-•/:■:4..ie'•.-'- PROBLEflL'CONCEllN: - In Orange County , there was a need to pool public and private re- sources in effort to better serve older persons , reduce duplication , in- crease efficiency and save funds . This need for integration was especially true for leisure and educational services to senior citizens . Orange County is the site of the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill and is blessed with three recreation departments - Town of- Chapel Hill , Town of Carrboro and Orange County - each delivering many fine leisure activities to the older population in their service area. Yet , each department as well as the University generally program for senior citizens in isolation . Thus , several good programs had low attendance or lacked publicity while ' others involve duplication. In addition , in a university setting like Chapel Hill where many retired faculty and professionals reside , there was a special need for mental stimulation in a variety of intellectual areas such as art, science , current events , etc. and a variety of settings . The program objective was to pool leisure resources efficiently and • effectively from the private and public sectors in order to better serve older citizens and at the same time meet programming needs of the sponsor- ing groups . • • SOLUTION: - In 1980 - Orange County established a new department on Aging to be a central resource for planning . and coordinating services for older adults . -This department „- as part of its mission , took the leadership in formulating two new innovative leisure programs pooling several community resources on behalf of more intellectual senior citizens population . These programs were: (1 ) The Village Elders in Dialogue with UNC Scholars and (2) The Saturday Series "Movies at Lunchtime' . The focus of the Village Elders program was to bring Chapel Hill University Scholars into an intellectual forum with retirees (Village Elders ) on a monthly basis to examine new ideas , to consider emerging issues , and to make new friends (socialization ) . After coming up with the program idea , the Department on Aging recruited the initial representatives, for a planning committee from the Chapel Hill Recreation Department , the University of North • Carolina-Division of Extension and Continuing Education and the Carol Woods Residents Association . When each group agreed to sponsor this lecture series , a permanent planning committee was formed and enlarged with retirees drawn from the University faculty and professional com6unity. The Committee ' responsibilities were to accept program suggestions from the audience , decide on program topics and dates , contact the potential speakers and re- , view publicity arrangements (brochures , news releases ; and reserve the- meeting place . . . ,...z....e.7.. 097 • - • - - • i"?-4k"6k:a 4 k•s°1...tkki gf tilk1 IM O'Vf - . • - • , SOLUTION: Continued For the "Saturday Movies at Lunchtime" , the Department on Aging solicited the support of a local restaurant who offered the facility at a reduced rate , a large video projection screen and video recorder . A video rental /sales dealer provided at no charge video films for viewing . The three recreation departments agreed to sponsor and promote the movie series and be .a local contact point for registration . A permanent planning com- mittee was •established to work up the yearly series which was composed of representatives frcm each of the sponsor'7.g groups . COUNTY ROLE: The Orange County Department on Aging originated the program ideas for the Village Elders Lecture Series and the Saturday movie program with lunch . The Department on Aging ' s contribution is primarily staff, specifically the Chapel Hill Senior Center Supervisor who serves as secretary and coordinator for the Village Elders Program Planning Committee and the "Movies at Lunchtime" program Committee. The Department on Aging is responsible for the Village Elders Program registration and mailing out the yearly program brochure to well over 800 senior citizens (Attachment) . The Chapel Hill Recreation Department staff , is responsible for preparing and printing the Village Elders Brochure as well , as assisting wtih program arrangements . UNC-Continuing EduCation is responsibl . for identifying potential scholars to speak for the series . All sponsoring groups are involved with publicity. With the Saturday "Movies at Lunchtime" Series , the Department on Aging staff communicates with the program committee on movie suggestions and presents them to the Video Dealer. Once movies are confirmed , space arrangements and dates are arranged with the restaurant manager. The program Brochure (Attach - ment) is then published in the county wide quarterly Department on Aging newsletter and each Recreation Department also advertises the program in their monthly calendars . All three recreation departments take the reservations which allows participants to identify with their local recreation agency. The Department on Aging then coordinates the—registration with the restaurant and provides on site supervision at the monthly program with one of the Recreation Departments . Department on Aging also offers transportation from the northern part of the County if there is enough participants to warrent operation . COSTS Very little special funds are expended for both of these programs Major costs are personnel time devoted to operating and coordinating programs . • Village :Iders Series Saturdav"Movies at Lunchtime" ;aunty rUncs • DoA Senior Center Coordinator (Sc) - S700 (5%) S7)0 Jo A Transportation 0 I 70 Postage cost for 3rocnure SOO 10t SO none 00)1 Receptionist (5g) 350 none • City Funds Chapel Hill Rec. Dept. Spec. (5%) (5%) • Brochure Production/Printing 80 none . . - UNC Staff time (Planning Com. Mtg.) 111 I Orange County Rec. Dept. Staff 0 I .:4mkpawm Senior Citizens Fees No charge 43.00 for lunch pe, person Mt .2 -7 V--:;%;=: if;,--117Z -- ••;" ":1* 0,14..„4; ,-0""s•lc,. ..K:7•7-4-•- • -7 at,TE:(44Voja...4.(1/4)41 RESULTS: There are many tangible results s for both coordinated programs (1 ) The Vi 1 1 age Elders is increasingly successful each year as can be noted by the program' s attendance record. Each month 's attendance averages 150. This last December , 1984, a record crowd of 230 people appeared for the lecture of Dr. James Leutze who spoke on U.S International Pol icy. Registrants call for reservations as far as two months prior to each lecture . Intel lectual stimul ation occurs with the question and answer exchange following each lecture . The program ts well publicized and supported through- out the county , -and each cooperating group receives exposure and credit for the success of the program. There al so is no duplication of the program since everyone is working toward the same goal s . The composition of the Village El ders Planning Board is significant to its success . It al lows re- tired faculty to still feel worthwhile as a part of the University Community , utilizing their talents and University contacts, to seek out guest scholars . The program helps the participants feel they are part of the here and now and an active part of the community, The University also feels a responsibility to the older population segment as a supporter of the program and to its retired faculty who attend the lecture series . .(2) "The Movies at Lunchtime" Series prevents isolation of the partici- pants and of the program' s sponsors . The Recreation Departments cooperate • to better serve the needs of the senior sector of the community making for efficient program planning and all groups receive credi." and exposure for being *a sponsor. A regular group of about 30 to 40 people attend each monthly movie . Up to 90 people have appeared for popular movies such as "On Golden Pond" . - -Both programs definitely saved money, time and manpower by pooling public and private resources and by assignment of specific responsibilities tp each sponsoring group. An outgrowth of these cooperative programs has been the continued close working relations among sponsoring groups in other • programming areas such as field trips and special senior citizens month ' s events . The lines of communication are kept open year round and public relations within the community continue to thrive . CONTACT: Jerry M. Passmore , Director Orange County Department on Aging 300 West Tryon Street Hillsborough , NC 27278 (919 ) 732-8181 , Ext. 280 • t . • 2E The Chapel Hill Newspaper Sunday, September 18. 1983 yy • • P • c.' JJJ • a . . Senior Citizen Fu A By HERMAN BOGATY And JERRY M.PASSMORE Director of the Department on Agi • . to his restaurant. "My father wh• Where but in Chapel Hill can you retired in Florida" Rueff declar nourish the spirit and the body at the • "asked me what I was doing for same time?At Air.Gatti's Restaurant,' senior citizens in Chapel Tull W corner of ZFranklin and Columbia, various d do?"This led to a discussion �• that's where!Starting in October and � • various possibilities such as a se on selected Saturdays once a month rC.cordinatedb j' citizens'party,card tournament,f• through May, older adults can see at Coup at Y er►Y Passr:wre,director,4ranyd discounts at his restaurant.Passmo throng charge a first older adults can see at :County ePa ent on Agr,9 .. . - •noticing the large video sere- 9:30 AM to be follow by lunch suggested"Wouldn't it be great to s • (sandwich or lasagna, salad and some of the old movies like Tarzan (sandwich at reduced lasagna, salad la of $3.00,n done by simply calling one of three Saturdays with perhaps a lunch including tax and tip. Recreation Departments . Chapel .Thus,the idea was born and eventna The Movies at Lunchtime series Hill, 968-2784; Carrboro, 942-8541; or shared with the R e c r e a t i Orange County, 732-8181. However Departments' senior citizens sta. grew out of a successful trial of the this should be done by the Wednesday who enthusiastically endorsed t • idea last year. Based on the before each Saturda experience and suggestions from Y Program. program and formed the planni enthusiastic nce older suggestions dots seven To remind older adults, a special committee for the series. participants, brochure of all the films and their new movies and one re-run have been ' dates is being printed this ear and selected for this year's viewers. The y This year's Saturday series w series starts on October 1st with"Ti's The a will be available from the Orange have an intergenerational empbas Wonderful Life," starrin James County Department on Aging. Van " Senior citizens may invite farm g transportation is also being offered members or friends(.13 years orolde gY Stewart, Donna Reed, and Lionel from Hillsborough by the Orange as their guests to enjoy the movie a Barrymore;with "The King and 1"to County Recreation Department. Self lunch. However, no younger' follow on October 29th. "On Golden drivers using the town parking lot on g " pers. Pond"is being repeated later,since it Rosemary Street can get a half-price wttl be admitted unless accompani_ drew such a large crowd.The movies �, by an older adult. are on video film supplied free of rate by showing their Senior Tar Heel Local citizens can take 1e charge by"$how&Tell,"aCha el Hill 'this example, of venal p t v P How did the"Movies at Lunchtime" cooperation among several publi firm that rents and sells tapes and series originate?You might say it can agencies equipment.The films are then shown be traced to a concerned Florida private bu and corn To our nowle d .. on a.giant seven foot screen located in senior citizen and to old Tarzan this is a one of a•kindupro ram fo Mr.Gatti's Restaurant.. movies.Last fall,Jack Rueff,owner of Senior citizens in North Carolina. It Registration for any movie can be Mr. Gatti's,invited Jerry Passmore, not take advantage of it? lino.Wh .- - .. .. . .., „. "t. 14 an . .. '. . • ' '... ••'•-‘ *:-.'`.."4i.--. 1"!‘i- .'' * • '".. • .,••; ... 1 •-•::: ::1-...t.1:1 .14 ILL ikt G1 . , • , .", .. -- .. _., ....:: .,--,..-7.,::....-•:::::,.,,i.,„ sI, . -• . -..• • ' .• • ..:1•,' ,:,-7.;. - • . , ri* •'' -".All d3.0.11(}g Ile . , : --.4;---.'v..-- •,,,..- -....:„,:e.--:-..---..• , -.4-.,...._! 2.-. . •:•:4.1„-_--:" •., , .. . . .... . . ii2t, ....;:i...:::-... .,,,-,,,.,:. .. •..§.1,, ,•, ,, -;.•:-..,..-,.1.;!.....) 4/41 •..,,...„..,,,,,,,,,,,,_.•,:,i....,.,--:=..,.;-,I.ir..,i.:,Lt.:..iii:.;,-:•:,-.k......-/,-,St,il A Ftt,6) --.--- • - , .... .. . . . . . .... .„ .. .., _ . • • -.4_„,..... ...,....;,„:„.„.2..,..)._:„.:...,...,.,,t,&....i..4'...;%,,r. '41,'-g.'',.e -,'":"..";:- _..e ea • • - • • - ,-_. •4. : '.....= 7'.,''..,.'"'-.;- .....•• ".•-..,. ':. ••til,,A,:.:;.4.4,.;,',...:,:,s.'7,;,:e ,',4.7;•:,?eA',...,-1■,..^.11E1:.,•:::-:.!Z.'•.-',---*.!-Ii'-i•''''•il.::-•••.1.1.g:..,:' •••••-t-t-::..:.....*:. rt.'!".--4:,:f."'';',15•it..1'...,%,... ■•••iCi::'.:;.5•1.i..'...j..:(,;.•'•• ••''.:,-■ -‘"•''. :,. ...,...;;:. ..,;:-I.r,,7::::-;.Z !....ti. i t.''4Z•':•:.F.:e"..-4-...t.,!..,......':... I 1....!..... .. s.i.- -, ::ti::!::,z: .: ..."i.,1.-z'4:7.,..;,...'.t.s:.-,•--i;".-'.:'•..%...' -.--e...4: ••-::••:.4-11..7::.',. '•• ::...`-....-• 'f.. •`...:-'-'.-.L'.?,7..''.....7`■••.'1.:-..i72-4 F-si.' . 7:;'''.:- , .:::.:f.:...,',..-''..t.n.:•.1.4...•V:- 4 *!, •:,:r"...".,.:':•,' :44,..,. -:"...?-4T,"*.-4.7.-:',:•-•,' -,-" ''''''--•-‘"'"-'--'. ' '•- '••••••••:. -•-•.`,Z.-14-.C.., ,:. :.„TA .■' ----•:::'.' -1 ,-".:` •.- ••:••-•-•*%-.L.:-.•',;* ,- ••.'1 • .'.."',I•';''•• -'.. • .•....'..r g- ..,11.7;••••-,,i'dg•-'1,-.41,7:- '' -7*.: '...:*:•:. ii I igt e ri...\*.,...1.''..'`::;■.:i:'::.4)'S p eau. (3)ut .• ''.o a s 1c • flue tlons'• ‘. : •••.--...q--...,- -...-- ,• .-.4 ..., ....,,..... ,... ... • .. -,...::::,......4. ,...-*:- "".•*:,•;;- • .• •...,7-•••-,•-.-:"• '.-,. •e.. -,.,',.,..7..• ,• ,..,,f..4-:•,..1.... ,,...*.z,.•.::•,..i.: •:.".A....-■ t.c•-1,:•.:_nt.::•?•;,:„,-; 7,..Y--„*„.",,,•:_7..:;.,:::...-••••• •.:-.:..i.:,_,•-•,..!;:irr,i..,..;; A,," .f'„,.:""-:;..:,:2:...4:::.:„.",,.;:, ., ''...'::•:.',, •.7".7:::,„ `••••.,_..":".`',f'....,,...-.::f•::`,•4,!,-;.....:,. -...i_:, .‘",•: .::. ,. . ,.■z.f..5.,.;:•.5,...........,..,:. ..,;•-•r.7.....•.::t.r '.:i.. ;r.:.,i,..,....•:: !.•:::.; .1.....L.,,..,:::f,...5...:1 1.c.j.4.:(+•,.:*:I T-2..;-*••,.,,..1,-; ..!..:...;:,..., t .,- , •-. „•,.. .- ,•,,,,,,..... . ..,f.7.,:.,,r■ .. ......,-:!,>:..:.;:,...•,%.!...r......1'. ,,..,.;..,.,../.;:g..;.,..,..,:,;;t:,...;...:... 7.-,,: g:4.-• .:. .....•.v. -,..3.•„:„.•:•• '..-..44„.44......"...",,,.-•.• :-;:.,'-:-A•:.t',4,-:CO' "" *, `•:-: ,'1:--.: 't• ""*•..., ,''':.'I As..."..:..1.'" -'" . .:- ."-' '' • ,....4.: ..`..:-...*:',.ii.::..;:, '-' •' '•• •.'- . •: • , •:.1:,-,:r.":1".•;.-c'ir..ti, (":"..r..1 '• s: ".:i'''''.. ••*••• •;!..*-•-'r'.'i'lL'4. ...'i'l•4. •':•••' 1X.Iii"--SERIES ••••:-.7;I:,..4:,--,:,-;i1c184. - • • - ----....:•-7'''''; '."' '•;-4-."''''',.",--r•*"..'-.1:.-'•••'-'".''..''': r ' . .; :.-f.i...• --.' ;.,..-j:.:::-..4'';'7. •-r ..."•%1 ' •:.,4';..„:,-.....:.,..-'..., **** * 1...t-:,::`,'"A ' ','I."....s.'17-*-47"-**"...-'•*:!*‘-'• ' •1.....";:'':;--• • :'••• .,,, '.:'..-,:;41...1-''' ',..:1-4'.'"...r----. -.-------.7=-. 77, : z•:•;e•A:,,i,..-•.•••,:-..:.1:7-4*•.-,,_-g-r.;3:i-; r."e-,:-,,..::.,",..ez•:-.r,`:7 s.,I,ef:,o..,.....,,f4.----:-;..;.•'....,'-r-,-.FV.*.;`,-.3:2. •-. • '''':.:-''.."4:-.'::•;.:-'.i".r..":.'.;.:,*;i.•'*;.,.?‘7' "45...:•.`r7•'..,C.Y;f_:-.77i: "' ; "'.:;' t•..i'*';',.-•,--..,••,04•:,' -.r.=,',.:.:.,.-•i.r.,"-..---:. ,,_:•.::, -.....-•.....6 ..--....•:._....:.••.,•••1,,..,..• - ,..,.... -•.7„sr,.r.F.,:t.:. . - ,:r".,j;i5..,,L.:-7,..- T;rha;:•facus• of'the proglsam: series-. ls to bring. Chapel: HAI:.UN1VaRSI7Y 7.-.-:,,,......-..-1-'4...:.:. - •• . •., •,.....„--...-::,.--,04.,..f..„;a,-.".":::;;Yti:Z.;,4"`:•:•"' .5-#4.•.,...'';':'.,..4i-L-4,:.--..- .--•.:*;.'''''.=:.:::.- ,.--4-.----?-. , ,t• rili .-..:,- ..,.;-:, -:-4-..1-.:`.r...."-. .•17... .-t.-• ,::.'*". e.r....3;'. :-.••l'.4- --.-'-- ..--••,... •;!;,, ',,..i.':....' ',..,.` ' •--...%:..t..7.z..;'..m.... ..-f0c.•si:.1..`e:At•...'-`•":1....th•-,..',.';-t--"--'."-!•:',.::::.''::::::::;;;:i..5..:.f..,;-_,::=`,.-r.,.;:::,!•:;-,.i!.?:1::X.-a4-...,.-....:::::" 1i;"""•.t.:::::.. -;--.•';.1:''''''':'--I'i. CHOLARS:.la ta:-.b.:'f arum.Wi.th.l...rettrees .(VILLAGE•LLDE R5)...... -..,,--. •-.,..-;77--•:,7-...:1,:t...:;=4,-;,-.:7;•-t.f:c....t--t..2::•:,;;,-4--,.,',.:::..q-.:....-g,,,,-!•,,,•,,..-•;;;,....,z_:-..,..:.... . ----,-1-r.'..f..,2*-1.:•.,,--.. - ---,,.,:.,- ,-,.•-,-^:r.,s,"Le. ..••-•,,,:,-"*.•/"..,(--,:-"41.`•''',',.. .X.V,:f., : ,..`”et:g■•;A:i."---"7,-;',"^-:,^A'9. -_-'AZ-vi;i'!....:•'Cli,:-•.%;E:4'4;.*IP::::.14,:*7-;:-.5*.;',..1:,..e4.:".;:::.74;=1.e•-•",!-:',Ittl7:4Rt.,r,.•;:... ''...;•.if.,,!....''..gf:.7'•;-i - - ..:=•• r5a.'7:::4::::1- Fe, :4-ra 4VIS*34;■.164447.?' "?i';-"I.-,:{.t.Z.VIP:-7.17:Cq:?:•!..ii`t1:::',4•::::71'44q..,,I ',--.4•!;;1 •-•;•-';•:•,-:;;;:•:)..7,-;.P.'if-'•IVE.".,•77.-•-1..-41:a T.:.::..;;;:•:'. ...1;;`,:::".'...tI':.,:jr-.1*,--:.-; - •'''''''''':-' i;:.7eka.iii iiirivil-Iiiiis.t.and changing,•emph a ses-:li n"..•a ca dein c....d7sciplines::::::-.`-;:. il"--:4,-.-....;,-t&-,„7:iil .--•. ,....;';...,,:::::',,,,,....1..:41,44:,,k,...r.:.. :•;;;; :: , I ,. •"7.,„..:;..... .. .., .'s.. .. ...._. „,,,,,.... ..,4:-. -..,;,,,:s.-,,,..:..,4,.•:..,.."::.v.......y.:.."7,.::4;:-::"•,,:".;..":•e"4..-.7-• .,...1•;„-••":".:;:.:^.••°••;7:::-EJLN:1`:,:". • .....'•-li Y.:s1"445;:4*--;`-'4*-f.-.7.*:q1'1:i4;;:.:il-st.i"."*.'"f-'. 44:7)S'''''•".>,7$:*""''V,•;:,,9%-,•"&•.it"1:%;tr4-:"•,•;1.474,,t'1444'r•74.7-g-7.00•7=-47,,.,"„(4...,,;..e*,Z,..:1,4-;-.:ii.T:'2,,,•':::_,44,^?-.7•4;4-•c......f):4••.,:-.0k....iti:z5`.",1•4.-t,:.;;F::re,....14,7.z.i.4.3.:::....:.,,!A.,...fi,r t,";.4 ':':'.,,.::44::S,`,;.v..: -7,-4:4.4'..?..Z.:g,,,..e..441.".3::f0eze.+4- 1,:*g,.`"..1-,..5i,;:R...5-,,,,,F.7.=,-...roza.4.4.---,. :Ygi...7•5.:',,,:--4 -.4=7e r-cP.:".:':'-.V.-7'.:::"----lt,'":[2:.-:-•:'-:".-4e...'4'-*:7-fle41:71k s...4.'::•.-Ir';'!?-4.7..1*-vi..7. -..it..*si% ' •.:-••••-: •*.:•.•17.r.M.,...!::NI:?!..1...,..7? .,^•-,. ','-.:•.••".-..'''..--.."-,, -... • • ''' e.' •”..:••"••"•-• .• . ' -•;*.e:V..^j..:;,•••,Z,!..;.;4.eriq.,',..:.:-.i:-.1.:-',"..-;::•-•::::.-:,,r4-..,-,-.."...../.'1,1•”7:r:P.---,•--;•,,:',.."- --,.4...,,,,r.re-:..5,-.1;:;:,.:.-!.---t.- - fr .'.:."e''.1-71'i:-t"S'-``S*Ztr'iriity to consl.aer err.erging.,1 ssues.,,-...:: -,..„14.:....,-..:,-,.5:.s-.: :,,...,... ...1....,:„„:?,.,,,,:::,,It;.r„.•...t.--;;;:;! ..;.5-4....rt-:i.-;.,/,--..,t.....,,,,;,...4-f,-; ...• :....-; , '14,-...11,;:csi,-;-..,- -3,i:1;:"..,-..,•4•,:st&.•,..-,4rn,-___,A-4.:-.*:-.---.,...A.ic;.1.1i7:-4:-:.,;(4.-.iN-1-*.i4:-..ii4,-;.-3;4;,-."..-3-x,..‘r-,--,-,.....-7.:-:,;:-:-.7?:: :-Li..,:i4::...;:..4..:12f...:‘,.:.:;:i•t,:.-- t4‘71-5-,ii.:-...;1.. ...r4,5..;t:„iz,..s.,‘-i.. e,i:...-ai!•'-.%--,,--., .•K-1:. ..F-t_iz,rq..Iiqfy'iyz-:trf,z.-.' ,;.',4'.!•,'O--•,,g;..4.,F.-i'z'e4lf ,a! ';:■:' ;'gr:':::F:i37fZIK-V`?'f:FZ;1 7--1-' "4:ti..A...,.i.:.:7,-ifili,,, I...7.-2.44-kr:•••;', ..i.:„:.;-,.3:1Z,.: 55,-r.',:--f.-'4:,-t -,.'-'.--'5.'4'g'.--:N::%1-1.••3::;-..,)17.A. 1!.:474::".-.i';'; t a::make.:nevk•-.frt ends:-:;.:',...:,,,---.:,.sz?:!-..--'54.-',-:=F: :,..,:;-1,:- .::•-ii,i-s ,..4--,41.1•4*.:•"...:,.. -.:•- x:...,;-5.t,r:,,t,..:F.-•:.-7ii::,,,,:..-_,;,-:,1-_:..:., .,.,„z,-_.-,..c.,-...,,,,,-,,,......, .;,......a...,,,..„...,...;-,1_,_•,,,„:1,-•.i,...k,..,„„....;; ,,,,,...., ,..2,..„..„.•?..:.,-,... ,„:-..,,,,..1......,;...-..,,,,.....-..,1.;;.,..:::-.,...1*„.NB..74-,4,....,...-.-7..'..-4:..,..-.., :,,I'S 4,_:_;•:,-;:er.".-1.-,,,,.,...1:-:-.-.4:-.:..,..4,•.i: r•..2,..t."...: . '',-,t'Y':.,til,',.-t,"...4511...E.1.--".7.- ..-!.=:,•,..1.',?.1.•':-.:.-4--.1........;:„.-1.1q.-:r.: ...F•s;:.,7-.T:i:.;.:tiK•i*: ,:',-...!-:'-':-- •-?-':,,::`-....-;t:4.se-','•-**-4-•.: 1-4.::::'44*--4: F•••••■:.'''14-*"=•.'''''!'"Z4 t,"4•X%.1-7•:•:i.,i,:•.41.-*/-1,:.. Q..•■••:,•?.g.■i.4,.7„1.,_ 04...., A,:,-1.1`:.".•,.,......;ui,..::::',....e..---Z..,.;,...--,.....,..ev,...,.../..;;;:...:g.-,-.MA7'":--:•••-•,..r..',4 n4.r...,..e$..-r...ZZ,..'V'.V e :.•,4.:.,....:,'........:.:... . :.77;'.0:47%.1.; ,.,..i..7 i7.:■•■■••,:..f-Zitit s,...:...,,,..?a,...;:7,-,..1.r..:,)r;.... 11,...,4 ,,,,7: ..:174,1I 41."',.::•:`St:,•te,..,..*:!...."7::,....:-,•.i.,....4!,,,,;14.,..Z.gte, 7.-......,,....,-...1.;.7.77:.,-I t..,........./......&!,!....,,,a,,:,,,%•,,,.....1,..-.To 1......e,....tez:-_,.... : ••:-..1";:'tY''C'Fil*S"... . -':..,:f:•Vv;f'.,'•I'.:::r-t.ti".*:,4:4'•I"?,,.;1",;•:-il'!`:'- ;":11-it.?..:-. ".."". ....P7t1;1- ?-'44z.'-'."`":":c*:.---.-.:?: .,:t.-1..=. --r- ••••.5.'..1. ; :i. : 1..ri:!Tr.V.::-.......;:ci.4.-'-,--:::: le-4,44*-;c!'.:::"-.1i_.:"S. • . .....i., ., • -.... :.‘.• :- . ...... . .,...• ,..•-■--- .. .:. .. . - • ;...,,:::..:::......:•,.....-:,i',.:-..;:"...?'...:,=.•:- .-,,..;:' '" • ' "'• •" • - :-.:- -...- ••,...•.i...-;, -...,:t......,..........i,..,....:-.::.4.,-;..... •i.‘...:.:..........7::;k-cc.--:......-- :..„... . -'-• '''• :: .':.:.Y. •DLACE:-'.., UNCAdriii n'fit-riti.iiii:.Building hg'.....f:.:. ,.....7....at :.'..:'?"•::..f.':1;•?,:i;,..-A`...*'::: TIME::-.'.::::3.6:00:a..*:m..;:-- •••••:-:.'f---::414,4:;•-:::-.• . r • • • , ......._, ,...i....s5,;,.:.;:; 72:-•,.. ,••••,-..: ..„; . • ' •• ••...7.;. ,,:,:,;:f..-..--.C.;.74..;.;ii.'"-1:::-'... - -..: i==: .1':.•"....:-.:'::•3: 910'...Ral e fah, Road;--.Chapel-Hi TT ••••••,-.:7.:.-..-:':5,-.•:---:=,,,--:...4::7...;,-.4.,,:--::', ...-.,.::!,;.- .:-,..,-*.:Saturday r;:. '''C...',•,• W4..i:a.'.2. ,t r.,,,.......4..r.r.'.1...'r.ii.......1,.1'c..:..;,..;...9.4..-.,;-.r.:.,..;,....-•.-..g..)... • ...:.:.3..,..,-....-,-.1.,•..r: ......, . •..t.::.,:......i.....,.:.•-....,..:.......,.;., :::_i.:;..t.::•, ..;..,_•• ..r.;..4:••4'.;;;:;zz...sit);ZIA-1.i.:;:t.4.--1.1;,1..=,::74.,-f.;:;::•;r.-.--;-.--i..•5,...1":4:;... ...,..:-:,...5...-:-,......:..:.:,,...:•:..,.......zr...-...:!. -..,-;:„:.-......,...:,... • -:•.:, ,....:',..,,.......;-.-.....:, .--,--:.•-:.•:•.•-•-4..:-,7;...-; .•..; .;,;:g*:7;:iC.:■:.'”*.i'';;;-.•?.1'1.1,..t:1*:-.;-.74".1.-'1651.ti:..'•";:'-;17-114-;;T:;(iit'5'1:1,-V11. 6.:7;44-.:z-Cir:,...7;i43-r'1,-;,'",;:.:,..p,":„-g.f,_-_:.5-.)-::4.`::";.:.,;,.:.,.ir.::•......--.7c,7;:,,,cf..t.';.ii,,....:::..1'...::..1-..r..,:ii,',7i. •,:7;1;',.,-,;:i,::;;;;;;;:i:417.;:'1;.-5•::::.:::.::3.:..:•:':,'-:"-I■i:•Ekz.,- :-•'',.',..,,,=-.••.- :-.,----47'.k -;•7:-.=',-,,i,.."3:4::.z:-,i.:;.;..-;r:P6?-:,-,.,;;:e.,:.,.:*-,5',.t.-5.;:.,4,5; ;-....f.tt4 i■-•.:7; s.7,'''.1",""r617.•;:,,,':::_.;.:, ,,,Si.7,6.....,-,.....::::r.:.?...7.-',"-:::".-:',..7::::.;.::i:;,1;:;.;•......4..'.....a.-;,.„:--.,..:.,....r.:;',......_.;',....171::.,...,1....•.: ..:,.....,-;,.`:,•.,• •-.,,.......?..,:„.2.4.,-....;;;‘....,-,;;;;,;,„tf. •."..4., ::.V.:;4:-.'"•5...i,-;--•'1,-.::7.--t:r:::,....:;::".:::::':.',',.--t;r:;.....":...:.:L.t...:-;-',..ze.::•---!:"...---zr.:..ri.:=;'''.,,-...;:•••••'.;.::::,,.t::!:;;--.V.-:'.:-.:i-,..1-!,?.7::;.:: :.--::-:-,:n..7:4.,.':;%::?..L.::-ii:=7..-'2.;-: -:' •'1'.:...:-..• fi:a.....".:;'.::,':',";:-.4--z-';•:',.:,1;-';'"%f r,'''Yn'''';"7"7..'.:'.. .......''' -•':::::- .•,. ...7 .'"'"..........":. ,,:'''':;.':',.!....■::::'Vrc; :'''....'... .f:::.?t.'..... .."■,..t.,.'''Z'441',.'''', 1 7; ' : -•••••••'"•*q'''''''; '''' :-'':'''"7-''''?""."4'-": --r'-~.'-:'.-'''-'.' D.G- RAM• •••::-.17-,-...--;,:;:•:.- :- ._•:,:••7-:,:•• ;y,-;::•,,f•:i. ,I,,,,--•::-::,.,.,:,..:;:-.-,•,..:?-.::::.-st.,..t.„:•7•=::',F1'..%:%--x: :"•.::: .:-,',-••:::::1,.‘ ...-..e-A.t>,"..., :.:.-....r.:..)-- ..n.2•:2'°•-4......::.;::.;7'..,- :.r ...-:::..--..:-.,,..--,... ..-...,••...,-....ziK7V14,k4 .7,..., ,. ,-,...k.:...%-...;,;.e.rg-i.•,•,-....- t -*.‘-,.'!"'7...:7.-.:.•"r•--:-. ":',.7, W."*. . ..Tf.,:,)::;:',.: *F:11,r,-(*;!--.1....:•,.-;_t:',":;.r.'L'f.:::•:,AP..• .-,•2...,..z...../.........., z.•:•44,-;,,,,,I.,:„,..,t....:x...14.,......,-.4:.t.,:',:..,..-.,:z;44.(?...„-.4,,-,:,..,,•74:,,,.....51.,/,..r,„Z.F.........,,. :71,4,..i.:::..;.!...,,....:::,..i,.., ;:.:,. t':.... . ';':5'1.,?7,;1.1,:er.";.•:::- ..17 -■•,.i."...,.....:',,,''''....*:,t-.;•1.4;,;--4.--,;..,..,....4t- . V2.:'.7..-17:;;I:i...?. '..%:?-•:::.t.'''':, ,!.I.X.?;:;!.:f•P'''.it.:'?: '.1•:•§‘‘•-iire'■=•::.,":'..F4:‹:,::•. .^.-1:.T:N,-,A:-..k-;:•:•,-.:,-;1 ,.•::-:2.-'...I.F7....,....:',::.z * -..*: ::--i .1..*::. :4:, ...:,-"-•.'`::77.:-;.....5:11;t".,...::;,:1:•:--..; ..-.;.:.!.-:."4:*•:-.•-7 :• ,•'.';: ,-.:,,.. ,;;;;,;7•:.;y.,:=•.••1;',4'.:•,-7,,:,?.-.4;:e2,s7:.i . :',::"•,g .5:•`-:.4.'• *-2,-?..Z?::::.`::'.•:',.:::::t1:-Zi...a4••• •••-;'":•'-•--1-'''"-'' , ";i'•"4...:.''•''.;i'-'5'4:2-.:'..::''''''I'''''...J."''•:''r"'.1:::''..i.s7 '...* 70 CIO B E R.• 1.3 :'..Mr... Mi chael:A:: McFee-, Lecturer:in .Creative Ww-iting-...De t ' ' t. •''''''''''--4'.?:=::";-;":''''' ........ . ,....,_.,.,..._::. .,.... _.... .._,... .. .,..... par men. ......,,„; :.,4.444-;3•4-......,..,...,i, ,•, ' ..:;•-•;••• •;`7-'-':.--4'1••• • . •."'-..• ;:,-"':4,10f,En g 1 i sh.:„ -...,:.--z _:,.....-.... ..:,.,:f...F.,72!.::•:::?•:-..-.7_,. .,:•.:.-.,. ,.1.-,-.:2,; - 7.',:: _-1:..4-.:4:.:...,:zz v:-.... .,.4. ;"•,-;,;;,."••_:,.!":,-:,..:44_,:_:•,;..7....-:;•,-;".,;;*•!,=4:, • •.: 7..lf Ist-di;.',:....:::.!..:''.::: :;if-l' `,1.-.1?.•:.r,wti kt.:-..u--.4ta.D.-0;:-.61:i-irig"':.Tic:::-.3•10ile';:ii..--A-ri;1;:fc'a--n7.O*0ei'i....if.ii;.' -''':'l''-:"..tj.:7,:,‘.1,.,-':. . ...:, !...;;,::::;:.,- 6' ::'5t7C.:: . t g;:l ...,,..,.. t.•if.:17..t:1:,_.1,C.;:2,:.W.,t,i.;,F.: ;•".:;,,,...........;•,-, . ...; 5:-...,:,f.:'''.'::.....;.:"..4-"?.....--.4 -,4'I%-‘4" 3.'4,•...• ...:::;...?.... T.,'.".t.r.‘,:-..::1,:,,,1%.7•-: .7:- -:.'..-,..;„..*:-...-'...",,,-'..:.,: ' ,t,t,,...:•'t:-.r- $4..1';;r..:,..4,,i:e.,-.1:i.,,i.".,%.1:2ap.;!.f.r:c'''.7,,,!4-:11f.;1.34t.F:5"..4.f4:".i:17...,....:.- i:.,-;.,.,;:,-., , c.-i,..-- , .,11::,:.-.1-.-....;-.,....,!!.....c. .'....ft*sr-C.", -/P-=',". . . .. DECEMBER...1;-..-..Dr..-James.'R`..‘'-Le Utze;'''Bowman and Gordon Gray Professor'of'Hfstciry• - -.--•-:•4•••-.•.'.==!--: r.'r .. • .. . ,...• . -.".. • .1„e:-.:.„.•.-A..:.`.'., . • ":',".......:7...4:i'''`':. 7,.. -i.:%.^..•'-','...'1%7,4.Urn 4.‘ed ST...ates Forel gm Poll cy for 1985-- and Be ....The Challenge and .-•:.-.,.....7•.:',..1%.g....;":•-;:'..7.:".4:"."••••-•-,. .•,..the•Prospects!' :•-•:-...-...,.,.:,,,,,,:,......,:!..:-:--t--&::.,:,,,ti...,,,,..,...,...-•-,.- •-,...,:•:•-•••• .,--...,•,...,4.. .: ..:,•S•.5.',1: ..-:,'i..' ''•,• .•''s;,..-i..t.,..-.--..-..: .,.....,:i..-,.,:j..t,t,. .:-.I.J2..f ',-.I.t. :"..7 i.it,.:...-. '.,-.::it.•;,,,,.'',..:.,.....-;--.7:i....i..1.,,„,-,:F,,'-i.,..:-.f.?.;%:,t-;,..,',....-:',:.--......::4:1/4.7„7";,.....f-;.';..7,,,:i;:.÷? ;,,?:....7 .vritf....f..:A.•-•,,t-X4it,41 :;;:...*:-..,-..is,*-:::-,F,;"1,:i.,;:"..,,-..-..- ,.. -.....,-.-: ,c,..p,.:.::* 5%•-a:Siii•F'aij'9,E.Q......7.:'...4',...,. .C-1:11.:;,-"A,:i.,-;:',t'n",:,"$-;;1•'&-,4• •■••-S..Y.,,,-'-- ,7:',.. '.• -;"';'-',:.•'%.':-A:;;:':45r:-.:.--.4.i-. .•••••'•:1-:.4.4r.,-":::::::""7•;`,g4, ...1.4.-'; .:.-.: .•'"."...:*"'"4.•*"."'. '''-• ':- ,r'..•-*''..•'.'•,-"t•,..:&'7:i.-1q1";'•`;.:.14--':4'...-.(7'.6'?:•:,;•24:..‘;'•'4154 *•4:::-:''4it•It ...,1::::■-.1-: 4.::-'.'r?.tr!..irs",.... 4.--• •■‘'..' ' -,,''''''..*;.'4..YrP''''Vr.'"''''Z'j',$." $:41V-."2""'.1,''''''''-',"',.`:: ."....-• - JANUARY 7 .. .. . ,...,„:.1:9;1„ii:.Mmf••Eric•B..-,Munson,•:Exe cut/ve Di rector: North.. Carolina Memo ri a 1....-:....'f.-.F7-....-.:„.•,.,.:~t:1-,:.-..,k :.,,....-p:-4- .;i,... fi.:- ; .. .z.-fif-'."e-.2.Ha s pi t al..r.:-.47.,.:1..:::t..-; .:-.:-',,,f4::,-1::::-,4,..s..F• 1-;:-::,,,.:-.%,;:ci.,,...:y,:,-*.;-,--:4-,:::**,....2:::-.5:•-;•,11:'-;---:-....-,;?'N.e.:,,--,!-;,,,••,;,.:F..;:;7.'' '',.....^....■'''.'''''''4,7"'"4-:17:•'4'W,:%,"":'•'•, • f"..;.5:-....;;;:.V...■:•;:-.11.;1,4%1.-.-..1512,„:.:V.:z...z.,:risi r ..• .••• , •' ...t.--0,.1,3,:!7..-.4,..,.........,,:r.P.,.......,;., „,..,•:,;.,..„..„.7,....„,•,..,,,.„t...:mi.,:N.,...,....,„,,,•,,,.,•,.:7:,,z...„,e,,,,:,..,.,...,..r.,,..,..,..,.....,„,...,-,.,...,,,,,,_,,4 ,,.;,,,,, ... ...'-=';•5.e.7::-"11'•=;:f.i..fZgt..,::..7:;:e%.:47Z-r-31*:,,:.Ilea i.tn'-',Care,.Financing:: voluti on--ors.Revoluti-on?"'''•••••..:7---.T.-.-,iia..`';'-.-1.---t•'...- "iJ.';,•=.--s-'1".-= s-,.. ---;fY.;:f.-...1,-,7,1-,4e .-,,,-....''.5 .1:7• .e.5';-■ -,744:,•-•,..g...i',•--: :'----1.-,, ''-'..t1..--.--s....,,.....,..:. ,,-.......-..'7. •'•::: :::1;''':";e1".•-.7.,,i"..,•••*`••'r.•:"-'•'11.Ati:.••E'7:'°-.4:::',';'•'. ;!..•7.':-.'...41..,!:,,L'i;:,•..,:1,•,3.•:-.I.-:'.,....;:t;.!;'.A;;;:;777•;;;!.Y4,!.4..;; ',..:;1.•.-:.„V.:Y..4..;:-.i .;;;7":7•::.;.-•.".-:=.1:i.,4.: ;i:•••::.;;;,,,-2.:1;:;.„..."..:,;;,....1•;:,.::..7.t•-•••,:f,trff.:.':7773_,,,i',.. ;141;.•,..1.-,-..,A,,;.■`,..4,-;•."::::::,....::.:.t`,4..;'....;;.:". i,-4;";.F.E13RUARY...10:.,•Dr:,..:.Wiiiiarn'F;;;''L:lit1 e--;'.University tY.."bi-stingiiiheil'Pr;ies-iar-rYOf:Ttliemi...sirY---.2'':::".':-.; ..:._.......,•••:.y.;..,:,„,..-:•....::,..,-:..1,•,-;:-."..-,:•-ir- - • - -...•••• . i.-•-:,,,..),....if:-.-,•,:•- •I,...,..,....-.:.-,i1..,:,,,..:-.Lhemi stry ,-- Whe ri-.--A7e.:.We Going?"7-':':-3•;;.•-T...:*.f:**,,,,...',7:.."'.l':',.;••:".:•::•;-;:'.11.::'.:-.:fr,.rz-,r;:".4%•••.-.:••';',.::: .•'.-;.'r.,..._.:7.::-..:ZE;-4:4. :''.7•A.-'7-•ili4••".''..-1•-•-•*:-...-...••••:...,;:i1:47,.--..i t.t.•.i.i'l:P.,:c...".*:;:it..,..-....',...'-.;!•,i:.;•.:.•......- ;„. -. :•:• ..--;,::.....:: ..... .-••••-•.'.-Fil...-...7.....1.•-:'1,".•:.:',.:-•":-...':-.:7:7_,.:*.."-,!.-:,,::•t•'-t-r:...".?.i•-:':-......-',,,,-...=:.•'.-,:i:-"`'...,.:"":.."--.I'-',4----.."..•.;:.:-. . -......,-,.,..:...:.:•=.::::......7.--.:-._:.:'.-.:,..i:::;:ip.-;;.;-...!,. •A‘..51'.4‘..::::.;,,..-....- -;:::::''•••;':,::.'..-7.:.':- ‘..•-.,•e-t--r..:."..--''-,..-7t..--4-'.----:.',......4. .,".•';.-:',q:'2'''.+:•;: s4•4:1;?-t.'-.":: :::''-,'7.-'•'....*"."''•'?,. ...'..'. :' . • •••,Fli;.;:,. .,-,-.t''!'••• . .,..'...,••,• ,,''''..,,••,-: •••■-:-:;-:- -'47:-••:.,^',-;-*•-_-•:::-'..-.::',.,.:,.,•;7....-k 7'':'-•''..•-.*:i'7::"-.'-'.."i7 ti i:::::.4:,.....■7'-v.:::?....'17*.:.'-;•:::*5.1...,+I.--,'..• , ' : • .,--'':.MARCH 16.-.-• ,,.--...,Dr::: Daniel M.. Pal Titt;; Kenan Professor School_of Law-' --''..'''''''',.-- ''''.::-•••'' ::'-':-.:-'7::"." ..1 .. "...'..7":--•' '..,••-.... ,-.-<-I-'.-"".--, u) rent:.Civil Liberties Concerns"_.:,. •• .....:•,--•.' .: ... ':'..::.:-....:.,:t::--i•::::-":•''.P-:--.•::;,.-.::‘,.,.. .,•••,.--,1:•:'...' .-: • ,,......•..-;.--,.-..:'. ;.....: :.:"-,...1*.::',,,,.•::',',.i'....*•;:i.,..:::•:.;-."'....;';'..:1-,.':.....i:. ..;7::,':::.-:='..:'::•'1:.- -±LS'.';:'t..!,:r•:..:::---•::".'•:',Z-•,:.....:'.iF....... '..:';'.":::.::-. ":.:::-.:.:f.1%•.:-,`.:::-.:-:•-..;.:..'....-'.;.1:**-1,'"•.:7.:?:'- :-;:..--'•• ..-"...::....". , - ..,;...,.,,..!. ...........•:.-. -......;-:'.1 :.,:t7:f.:•:',,:::::.: -, .'-..-' '.::-■..,-?..., •':.• -.!5: :c.:..c2.: :'.1:4;.;74.,.....5 ;,........F....;•-• ,-,.::t". --..•:...--.-:."'"•:-.!•:::: _. e -:. .•*;-*.ei;5"?.• .,...-..7.7":":.•.-:'',",:. ..-.....Z.....r•-:- .. -•;• ••-•- ;- ,..!..-:ftv:::•,;;:.•-,; ..*.;.--.T:,;f.;:::•:::.:* ,.." .""- z.'--‘•1-•••.:,-;.*"*.rf-1-•'-.---:*..;.' :Z.:::i:•,-.:•'.',-.-=:,-.''. -:: .• . ,,.:"7 . .„•,...-, •,,.if 1.,y". ,.:...r..,,.. ...,:,:..-....*:,..:., ••-• . :::-:::,...;74, .....',.. :.::j. •i:-1,.4.7........7';•;, ZT.:.,..,. /:...11,1..-7 ...,:%..:•••-:•,...:.•••::!.;e'.:t.-L.-..r.*;.•',..7.:-.f.• ,:7,--.._-::_...:•-•.,..'....,..**:•-•:.:.:7. .n.'...1."-:-,:. ...-;,"''i, - ..-,:-'-7..;,..-.•.;,. :::- •-:.::""7.,::,:;•:.F.1:-•‹ -.:...:*/`.ii;I:::-2.*:7-:,,....-.4 -•••::-."4:;i4-.7.:.::-..t:i:f:`'.:::IS: ...;..:..„.:,:: ,, •-.....-;-;.";.. ..;.i• ... ;;.."..';'•"::i;I:7:-;:.•,':;. .'? -:-..:'''• :.5...: : ,.--";..;- i - r::,:-----. : '_. *--•••••::- ..-.•:-..:. --.?.::7.7.:-., ::"..s....: "...t.:'.''':.c.r:.,'",4.:---:-::. •••-.-- - ..- .--'.-•••• I--4-- '....-• r•;7.--.-...,-',.:••1',- •-•- ,e-'-, '-*.:-/ ,_,•••=: -, , . •-..7".-'4';`,7.:Ii: • .''.'• "" ""-"---- . . • • --' - • -, - . : -- ... .. .. .. ,. •- •,,,,,•;,:-., .,•-•,..:, Reservations- are necessary in order. ..to assure adequate seating.... Please .. . - •-• •-• •.' -,..•:-..,-.:AA. cal 1 -the Department on Aging (9684478 or 732-8181) to rake your:reser- .: . limited Ant. • - ..-.- , - • -,..,:.;•.,:e-V * vati on prior to each program. Reservations are . • Please cancel Pl .*.W• - .. -•. •:::, . , .. , . .... . ' .- .... Your reservation i f you cannot a,4..ter.d.. There-is no charge for programs. --- . .• . ;7: ' 1'1 ' . . . . o Nzens.On] spy The Deparmte1ton All"anik3ttb $exea]Fori'3apai erne;piChppili-Hot.bit l4b;�hrl`t7 tein�eGbuulypstr,tlyspnncor.the ��, :?" ... _ ,:'�°b�. . .:...•. RtgFdRjt;�,tt rti�t►eMmula.Serlaa'l3kNh 5i=8 t►f,:184 tR*din-.9i tr4,^Cft6jfe3�JfQ$cbttt 'T bia tram 4:tifi a Frartt;Iilt:'niiit' ; :,z• oft.. air trr_l; rm ort-sgl�¢W •wl*be �s' 7 fnru a rs i 51 -�i:'-'• _ - - . .. .�_� �Nyg)F! �4�:Po teea�'{ttFEt�rt.i�:ixieludt�7kc� -. .'ti, w.GL. -F.:r - s.:�T.._7�!N�•t+��'1Sr'�Nii1I{SiC':•_'.T•r ' '- _ ficuucti writ iim "cheice ofeii ;std uiis�otnrt aip;<drink :tt 141it{1fVfS >tii4•f.ot.Midi►i"}ar;ETae�•ferd. t i b�s9f�1. .r,'r^Y'4{';'S: •fj;.:,3.�%.�i:.�:.,,..;,�:�t...�...4'__ '- ."�..� �tt��:- .. .•��t7t�8.�1j}�� TL�6}�7tl�S'� '��1G��`a.afl ^��•,y�.,� •�J'{sI► .. ...� ,. _.:.. . .._ ,F,_ - . . _ d:'oumy;�3i 81�i•.E3sadltne:Wirt� a'Itittlisy�si�fam:ttngolnsnt:�.Paiss bintin '_ ' �'�.-• � - �¢�1?tittPi►:I�_tlrtd�1�S�ifot iia -'°:_ •y,-".�.,__. . -. ...•: - •'•. -. ._ '11JUE57 s' Srinitii"C3t rin tn$y htirlt;a iamfly memioats tfg at:ih!fr guests(ne chilidreq usider]3 years :;� - _ ... .. ... . .. ... ... .... . . _ .. . - 'hrdfittdnafs�-..._i � - �-��.,::---'.-.- _ ._•.. • rtBed sYg t�'tiaitbjiotfaYibri bje3ir'ri'�fii�li�ditTri�cah ihiinga'County`t}apt.oq • .. .- . Agirty,.'732-SY81,ext:Zflf). IA intniriiutti a(`9�S��icigants tat required.) - - :� •.:. . -. . . =-•F71rri saggeuffons wefdn>lriih'.' pass them on to a Coiitmittee•Member. Video F11im lijl'9"ur&Teil - - Tom,?i�cFall - r • ti. PloiinTnli Committee J . Mek-4-,Trent, DoA irronram Schedule Dorothy 4apzlex, CH Rec. Daps. (Movies subject to change). Carol Rosenid d, Carrboio Rec.Dept. Brian Cox, C�r:inge Co. Rec. Dept. September 22 "Casablanca°1993(112 min.)Classic story of William Holden is assigned to destroy it.Cast in. Tom Tarlton, Mr. Gatti's an American expaMot who Involves himself in eludes Alec Guiness. romance and espianage in North Africa starring February 23 'Awiinto}fall"1977(96 min.)Comedy starring Humphrey Bogert and Ingrid Bergman. %00 Ws,Diane Kenton.Aliens. October 27 "Chariots of Pine•1981(129 min.)Motivation autablagmpillcat love story with insights an ' TfrfiilHtittrsni<cttarvo• and the well to•win are _ �;-��.-• - poignantly-and dramatical•, ii6astilps,twine. - fy portrayed In this story of two grittsh athletes Match Sit -r�3H�'ilf ElWiidrud C A touching arnott nhi ' striving to win major events at the 192 Paris drama about NlaApnahip betweep a mothgt 4m' her teiniinally 19 diiughter.Starting Jack s .,.;3 .• Nritrerrrber 24 ontste lr}$ :,l ttlFttlgl�ng actor Nnde_wv*an Nil ttoistmi.5ki17cY'dka„��i�}s. :_-'�` asiope tts.euwuiatt.$t6g'_ A1!ttl• 't• Tfre {�i;efe.Vtlltnimr�:t r� EjGAgR'Ndi t-e►iBa• ,:._ ' ' Musical a ed baseii Tel •.; r} Hers tuber 7$ "i31i' hi� qt'�+7i 9*71dCti_l{1�iarsharii, tart 11,01 gr Joe dUtR bi>'1#Erzad+>tah)t1aY s no gtipldu �1atltt Q�?toe' :titlla GF slfe•And. irritlhline Ciiaola,6tat in.thts May a6� ••-Fiddler on the flout a lit,(3 miq)Thls hlemrteal hranouttt rtf tits dark ii riF"ih7'Russlart tiiuical.sterrlri •is.the p1oYy oil - ': :• f.rtre�v,;n,,lutiaui.. �Jyt w�h farmer.at the? atfhL,terl?ivSF;: - - "'+n"+Y'Issa dIIUghtBRs•t•:118 11tf�R: iSfi @.tits 1411f6 _ _ - - - rofts.jllt-��tAgt ls.��,1TC6#�+1'�tslattr•tit" ..i-• - _ attl'his Earn tetidl'l�B•P8Y61i' - FV`,'. 'a Bige.fi itii enemy'ifrt 't;and nAn FOUR COUNTIES IN STUDY COMPARISON POPULATION TAX BASE Guilford 325,000 9.5 Billion Mecklenberg 426,000 18.2 Billion Forsyth 252,000 6.3 Billion Wake 325,000 31.0 Billion Orange 79,000 2.0 Billion ORANGE COUNTY FEES 79-80 $ 72,908.00 80-81 $ 84,688.00 81-82 $ 104,666.00 82-83 $ 64,930.00 83-84 0 $ 81,511-58 [ kA , . -B- • " .i . .:.• 1. Attorney salary $38,500 plus 17% fringes $ 45,0 2. Secretary (hRifm -tie) 45 (30,000+ $ 35,100 ' - 8,190 17%) I. 8,190 i 3. Telephone, copying, supplies 2,200 1,000 ,14 1.7.i. 4. Travel,& mileage 1,200 60C) o t.."5 5. Periodicals and dues 2,000 1,000 6. Office space 600 feet at $6.00 per foot 3,600 1 ,800 k .., 1: 1 7. Capital costs 2,500 2,500 1,1 1 1 t I 8. Legal library 6,500 2,000 f 1.' 9. Contingency 15,000 _0_ ).P 14 it $ 86,235 $ -52,190 1 I [ 4 r 1. i I ; k li 1 O' ti Fr 1 I , 1 1 , i 1 ' I t , . , 1 . 1 _ _ , lictr t 7,3 }j ,O v s; D�Q 1. 7610 �,� .�� ©a . <•�. �s �� 30, a ooDsoat�.�,1 doo i r , Q/l. � �O`� dt12�..tZQ�!/}� (" '=6'A �j C � �✓<'f✓tt . 4.. G � �S©�G' ♦ Yom`.'." ^e• %' �.c..c S7-�?�iuG'L .(:ice j.@r�t�•C'act♦��, --•--- - ------ -._ _._----- . ----------- � nab`' ..�`- ;-: .�.�r�-. ._.�� _�,s- o<_/ C`.�•tJ.��a.�SZ �'�pdO f o� ,�.-c.�i /�`• `�i'i 044 za .<—� ��U•,R�t�t�.-9�+�i�+YyF..ltcif�Y �� Q�4/ C.L4•aP.Gt�.�ru�v�,CZQ.�..(!♦e-q„Ct� e '` .__.. 1 v � 165,000 ltJD Only I'tor 71 9 �-� •�=�� $v � � e�,5�,dzk...�c�},un4,C�.ti y�,jf/C��, :.e3�tb.'..d'1'""`tz! �""...�4'.( ��,e..`ryase e� sl'.aev•,e..G``�L 7'z'�-r�.�i¢.ezl.p�, ° "D" 4 ' ORANGE COUNTY FISCAL YEAR . TAX RATE. % INCREASE 197 -75 .60 1975-76 .65 8.3 1976-77 ? .68 4.6 1977-78 .78 14.7 1978-79 .84 .7 _ 1979-80 .90 7.1 _ 1980-8 .995 10.5 65,8 1981-82 .544 27.0 1982-83 .55 1.1 1983-84 .55 198 -85 .55 93.9% ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET BY YEAR 1974-75 $ 7,099,000,928 1975-76 $ 8,115,000,937 1976-77 $10,229,000,295 1977-78 $12,6l6,000,927 1978-79 $13,908,000,429 1979-80 $14,001,000,779 1980-81 $16,013,000,148 1981-82 $16,720,000,533 1982-83 $17,513,000,535 1983-84 $19,027,000,258 1984-85 $22,335,000,914 7...- If ' DATE: TO: Orange County Board of Commissioners FROM: John T. Horner, Director of Revenue SUBJECT: Unpaid Real Property and Tax Lien Advertisement The Orange County Department of Revenue reports the following unpaid taxes3tha-r&liens5mlosid7real property for the year 1984. csouvlQa COUNTY $ 627,430.16 CHAPEL HILL $ 145,607.74 CARRBORO $ 48,300.42 HILLSBOROUGH $ 18,917.51 TOTAL $ 840,255.83 The Revenue Office recommends the following date for the advertising of the Tax Lien. If this is aggreeable the following date can be set. May 8, 1985 � \ % \ ( February 4, 1985 \ / { N O T I C E \ � Due to the death of his father-in-law, Noon Walker will not be in • attendance at the February 4, 19$ meeting. Reception will be February 4th, 7:0. pm, a Walker's Funeral Home. Funeral is February 5th, EMEIGEOlissenremer _ W 102 -..:. CI.RAI\ E COUNTY' • ,,,i BOARD 0? CavAISSIONERS ' . . It Action Agenda '',,,, em No El?' ifi ACCION AGENDA ITE4 ABSTRACT NZLEZMG DATE February 4, 1985 ll 'w., ..*: Subject: MEETING SCHEDULE FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1985 . • P-: L DeParbrent: BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS . Public Rearing: yes = ,y 110 •;",, ik ' • • ' ,i, fAttachment(s) : Information Contact: 1 NO Beverly A. Blythe , • tt1. Phone Number.: 11 -- gt PURPCSE: To reschedule the March 7th regular meeting date of the Board of • Commissioners. il;,,ii 11 ,,11? '1',...■ NEED: To take official action to change the meeting date of the March 7th P V, , meeting. 0 Ai! .'.V ,p it.:„ • , , 'A '., .,. :',...1 , ., .. impAcT: iA change in the meeting schedule for 1985. ..!' ... RECOMMENDATION: As the Board decides. PI • ORANGE COUNTY • 004 ' BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA , ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NO...E49, .-, .!„ MEETING DATE' FEBRUARY 4, 1985_ SUBJECT: ENGINEER SELECTION FOR DEVELOPMENT OF DETAILED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, • EFLAND SEWER PROJECT '. :15 . DEPARTMENT: MANAGER'S OFFICE • 1 PUBLIC HEARING: . YES x NO t i ATTACHMENT(S): • INFORMATION CONTACT: MANAGER'S OFFICE .', YES ext. 501 tf. . PFONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH - 732-8181 ;;.• HILLSBOROUGH - 732-9361 CHAPEL HILL - 967-9251 MEBANE - 227-2031 DURHAM - 688-7331 PURPOSE: To receive the results of the assessment of engineering proposals and other • measures taken to evaluate which firm could most effectively render the service needed. , , -- . ' NEEDS: Eight'of-the ten firms from which RP's were invited responded with proposals of how they would approach the project. These have been evaluated according to twelve factors considered important in judging a firm's_ capacity and perfoLmance. While several were found to be highly qualified the interviews and extensive reference checks enabled one firm, Hazen and Sawyer of Raleigh, to be singled out as the most qualified for dealing with the particular requirements associated with the Efland Project. The firm's strong points include: 1. Ability to meet the County's timeframe; . 2. Verifying the preliminary plan to see if the pumps, lines, line . . sizes, and layout can be made more workable and economical; . . . 3. Staff depth as evidenced in the number of princiPai: engineers available; 4. Means of securing a thorough approach to surveying and soils analysis; and . 5. Extent of owner satisfaction on the sewer lines previously designed _ which are at a similar or larger size to what the Efland project will consist. , IMPACT: Engineering fees are funded as part of project cost. The fact that "..- Farmer's Houle nancial support is involved neceSsitates the fee amount being according to Table 1 of the attached chart. RECOMMENDATION(S): AuthOrize the Chair, on behalf of the Board, to enter into a contract with Hazen and Sawyer, P.C. Engineers upon approval of the County Attorney as to form and the Farmers Home Administration as to its requirements for contract inclusiveness. 5.1 _ 0 O Form FmHA-NC 1942-19 December 1, 1984 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION ATTACHMENT I to FORM FmHA 1942-19 MEDIAN FEES FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES AS A PERCENTAGE OF NET CONSTRUCTION COST NORTH CAROLINA The fees are to be adjusted to suit special conditions stated in the contract. Table I fee schedule may be used for that portion of a construction .project which is unusually complex such as a water treatment lant (surface plant or ground water), wastewater treatment e interceptor lines, water or wastewater , wastewater collection and in place clear wells, intake structures, an of treatment facility, and appurtenant work to above (electrical, HVAC, .etc.). Table II ordinarily will apply to all other design work such as water lines, wells, minor water treatment facilities tanks and foundations, and manufacturer or contractor Zdesignedn clear ewellsed (metal or concrete). ' All construction contracts within each table grouping will be totaled prior to applying the fee percentages. Table I Table II Table III Total Actual % % Construction Cost Fee 100 000 Fee Fee 10.3 g 0 200,000 9.3 7.9 300,000 8.7 6.0 7.5 400,000 8.4 . 500,000 6.9 2 4 4.2 5 600,000 8.0 6.9 7.8 6.7 4.0 700,000 7.6 V 6.5 3.8 800,000 7.4 6.4 3.7 900,000 7.3 6.3 1,000,000 7.2 3.5 5.8 2.4 2,000,000 6.7 5.8 2.5 6.4 5.5 2.1 3,000,000 1 4,000,000 6.2 5.2 1.9 5,000,000 5.9 5.0 10,000,000 5.7 1.7 4 1.5 S.6 4'7 7 15,000,000 . 20,000,000 . 1.4 1. 5.5 4.6 1.3 The fee for project costs falling between the figures shown in above tables shall be interpolated to nearest one-hundredth of one percent. Compensation may be negotiated on a lump-sum basis for all projects costing $100,000 or less. VW, 064 • COMPENSATION FOR RESIDENT INSPECTION 1. Unless notified by the OWNER in writing that the OWNER will provide for resident inspection, the ENGINEER will provide detailed, full-time resident construction inspection. The OWNER further agrees to pay the ENGINEER for such service in accordance with the fee shown in Table III above. Detailed full-time resident construction inspection is defined as having an inspector on-site at all times work is in progress which will be covered during installation or by subsequent construction. All above ground installations which can be inspected for compliance with plans and specifications after installation may be inspected periodically as needed and will not require continuous presence of an inspector. (a) Ninety percent (90%) of the total compensation payable periodically during the construction period. (b) Ten percent (10%) of the total compensation upon final approval - - of the project by the OWNER and bola and completion by the ENGINEER of all the requirements of this contract. 2. The resume of the inspector(s) to be assigned to a project will be submitted for approval of the OWNER and FinIA two weeks prior to the date of preconstruction conference and the approved inspector(s) will attend the preconstruction conference. 3. The compensation for basic engineering services and for resident inspection shall be full and total payment to the ENGINEER for the project unless special services are required as specified below or in SECTION D. Compensation for special services will be in accordance with the contract. OWNER'S INITTAL ENGINEER'S INITIAL • 006 1 , HAZEN AND SAWYER PC LI ,,-• ENGINEERS MAILING ADDRESS:P.0.BOX 30428 - RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA 27622 0191 782-8333 OFFICE LOCATION:302 COTTON BUILDING 4505 CREEDMOOR ROAD CRABTREE VALLEY January 15, 1985 Mr. Kenneth R. Thompson County Manager •. County of Orange , 106 East Margaret Lane Hillsborough, NC 27278 : Re: Proposal for Engineering Services Cheeks Townshi. Sewer Im.rovements, P ase Dear Mr. Thompson: i Hazen and SawYer is pleased to submit herewith our proposal for professional engineering services for design and construction .administratidn of the Cheeks Township Sewer Improvements - •H Phase 1. We are particularly appreciative of the courtesy extended us in allowing additional time for preparation of our proposal. . J . . In preparing our proposal, we have reviewed the feasibility .,4 report dealing with proposed sewer improvements in Cheeks Township and discussed the project with Mr . Laws, Assistant County Manager. We understand the scope of work required for • this assignment and feel the experience of our firm and the personnel proposed for assignment to the project will give the _7A County a highly qualified team of experienced professionals capable of producing a technically sound and cost-effective design. .1. Experience of Firm 11 Hazen and Saywer , P .C . , is a nationally recognized environmental engineering firm specializing in the design and management of water resource development and wastewater collection and disposal facilities. Since its founding in 1951 , the firm has completed more than 900 assignments in the United States and abroad for government agencies, utilities , industrial . organizations, and other clients. The Raleigh h re ional office of Hazen and Sawyer, P.C. , was establishedin 1973 to serve clients in the Carolinas and Virginia and has giown steadily to a present staff of 21, including seyej reglgtered professional_engineers . I The Raleigh office has been responsible for studies, desigiiand OFFICES IN NEW YORK,RALEIGH,AND HOLLYWOOD,FLORIDA IMEMSEIBUIVEllwaswastaifir.......--- 007 _ . I Mr. Kenneth R. Thompson January 15, 1985 ., ., Page 2 • . ., 1 - . . 1 A design and construction administration for water, wastewater, and . drainage projects whose aggregate construction costs now approach $65 million. . The Raleigh office has direct and related experience on 1 several projects very similar to the proposed sewer improvements for Cheeks Township . Summary descriptions of several example - A projects are included as Attachment 1 to our proposal . Attachment 2 is a firmwide brochure which provides further background information about the firm. ' 1 Project Personnel • , Hazen and Sawyer is particularly qualified to undertake design and construction administration of the proposed sewer A, improvements for Cheeks Township. The firm has successfully completed or is actively working on projects of similar scope . with comparable financial arrangements. Design and contract • administration will be assigned to senior engineering personnel in the Raleigh .office with in-depth experience in heavy utility , . . design and construction. Resumes of those persons to be involved with this .project, Raleigh office personnel list, and a proposed ; 1 organizational chart indicating various team members and their A responsibilities are included as Attachment 3 to our proposal. . ,1 The project will be conducted under the overall direction of Mr. Donald L. Cordell" P.E. , as roject manager, responsible for. • Chse-----dvera11 technica performance and administration of the project . Mr . Cordell has been responsible for design and A construction administration of water and sewer projects in • Greensboro, Raleigh , Garner, Holly Springs, Spring Hope , Chapel Hill , and Warrenton, North Carolina totaling in excess of 200,000 feet and ranging in size from 4-inch to 54-inch pipe . The projects in Garner and Spring Hope, North Carolina each included sewer extensions into previously unsewered areas requiring a 1 combination of gravity sewers, force mains, and pumping station. In Holly Springs, North Carolina, Mr. Cordell is managing design of a complete wastewater collection and treatment system including some 60,000 feet of gravity sewer , two pump stations 1 ..1 and a package treatment plant. Mr . Kevin F . Carter , P. E . , will serve as projecteagineer _- responsible for—keparation of the detailed design and conEr—a-Fe documents . Mr. Carter served as resident project representative for water and sewer projects in Charleston, South Carolina , and for the Bermuda Center Sanitary District in Winston Salem, North I .,1 . 008 Mr. Kenneth R. Thompson January 15, 1985 Page 3 J Carolina . In the last year, he has completed design of 34,000 • feet of raw water main for the Orange Water and Sewer Authority and 8 , 000 feet of gravity sewer in Wake County. Mr. Jose fl ,B. Meeks . P.E. , and Mr. Robert w. Batchelor will be assigned to the project to assist in preparation the contract documents and • design drawings. Mr . Meeks is preq/ently serving as project engineer for the work in Holly Springs , North Carolina; and Mr. Batchelor is senior designer, in the Raleigh office and • • would be responsible for preparation of the contract drawings. 1 Various other Raleigh staff including engineers , designers , draftsmen , etc. , will be assigned as necessary to produce a well conceived and thought-out design:: • surv - bet subcontracted to Mr- Robert T, Newcomb, Jr. , R.L.S. Mr . Newcomb 1 has over 35 years experience in the field layout and surveying of water and sewer lines and has been responsible for the surveys on all water and sewer projects undertaken by the Raleigh office since its establishment in 1973. His experience assures that the • field inf • (- tion needed for design is properly developed and serves to expedite the office portion of the design work. • Subsurface investi • ations will be subcontracted to Soil & MateriAJ_Eng,iheers Inc,,, of Raleighz Soil & Material Engineers is a recognized leader in the geotechnical field in North Carolina and has worked with Hazen and Sawyer on a number of previous assignments. Approach to the Project Based on our review of the information furnished with the request for proposals and discussions with Mr . Laws , Assistant County Manager, it is clear that the highest priority during both design and construction must be the extension of sewer service to Efland Cheeks School . The failure of the existing package treatment plant serving the school lead to the issuing of a consent agreement with the Division of Environmental Management calling for replacement of the existing treatment plant by December 31, 1985. If selected for this assignment, our( 71>ITlitia effort would be directed toward preparation of a brief design report to review . -1 -j the information developed during the easibility study and establtah_fimal_design objectives, concepts, and parameters . For • exa-115Te7-E.nhe desigirre-port. would review the 1Qqation and sizing exj,t—er---i-a—f-o-r---tb-e_p_r_o.poserl_pumpi--n-g—s..t.a_t_i_o_rLs to assure that all mosannommosm......, 009 Mr. Kenneth R. Thompson January 15, 1985 Page 4 factors influencing the design have beenconsidered. Routing of propose gravi y s wers and force Mains would be reviewed to be economically served and that existing utility conflicts can be minimized. Since the need to provide sewer service to Efland Cheeks School dictates both the design and construction schedules , we believe that consideration should be given to a separate caris_trucion contractfors_e fapilitips service to the _school . The required facilities would include construction of Pump Station No. 1 and Pump Station No. 3 with a limited amount of gravity sewer serving each station and the force main along U.S. 70 connecting to the existing sanitary sewers in Hillsborough , North Carolina . By separating this portion of the work into separate construction contract , the County could be assured that design and construction could be completed well in advance of the December. 31 deadline . The remaining portion of the sewer improvements lend themselves to a separate construction contract that could proceed different pace without undue conflict and interference. tf).he County is o osed to. ttiq would d be ne-a-e-t-saryto require that construction of the sewer facilities required for service to the school be expedited _ to assure compliance with the December 31 deadline . This approach should still insure that service to the school , be provided by the deadline, but would have a lower margincbferror for unforeseen conditions during both design and construction. Regardless of the approach selected; the County will be given an opportunity to review and comment on the design report prior to proceeding with preparation of the final design. Hazen and Sawyer will review each recommendation of the preliminary design report with the County staff and make revisions as needed based on their input prior to commencing final design. During final design , Hazen and Sawyer will furnish the following services: 1. PiEflinl_iaa..merIL and Easement Surveys Plan and profile surveys of the pipeline alignments proposed in the preliminary design report will be conducted . Vertical and horizontal control will be / based on existing USGS and NCGS monuments available in 5,r— the vicinity of the project. • • 010• • I Mr. Kenneth R. Thompson January 15, 1985 Page 5 : 1 • ' • The initial effort will be directed to establishing a pplIpinary_plan and....pr.pf.i.le along the proposed route . Preliminary drawings will be Prepared and a tentative 1 horizontal grade established . excessive excavation willbe_identtfted_and_evaluations made as -. • . to field adjustments of th.e_aligmment to mislimize required excavation. Additional field surveys wfir—6e Ilia71-4—Wherehe-66sSary to establish final plan and Easement acquisition surveys will be made based on the final sewer alignment. Easement maps will be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Orange ' County Register of Deeds. Upon approval of the maps by the County staff , Hazen and Sawyer will furnish maps suitable for recordation by the County. 2. Subsurface Investigation • Once the final pipeline alignment is established, a subsurface_investlgatientoifigatify the extent of rock excavation is recommended. Where_pos_sibfeaxs alignment will be_ Dad e_t_o minimize roa_axc_ailEIOn . Knowl4dye—of the rock excavatran quantities will permit more accurate estimates of the construction costs. 3. Preparation of Contract Documents • .11 Important aspects of the pipeline design will include finalizing the pipe alignment , selection of pipe materials and pipe beddings and d-A= lopment of material specifications. Plan and •rorl- irawin. s at rul • a horizontal scale of 4_QQr5Ofet pr inch will be prepared. Other scales can boused . i.L. desired by the County staff . Teennica specifications will be prepared that addresrititsal construction materials , minimum cwtructiostandar.ds , specialized constructio techniques and final restoration of disturbed areas . Bid documents will be prepared as necessary for soliciting construction bids. 4. Final Construction Cost Estimate ased on the final. desigrLdrawingsand specifications, Hazen an —Baywer will prepare a detailed consjLructAon. • 011 Mr. Kenneth R. Thompson January 15, 1985 • , Page 6 • cost estimate. This estimate will be furnished to the County for establishing a construction budget: 5. Final Review and Approval Hazen and Sawyer will review the final contract documents with members of the County staff . Upon approval by the County, Hazen and Saywer will assist the County in securing the required regulatory approvals by participating in the submissions and discussions with the appropriate authorities. 6. Assistance in Securing Construction Bids • Hazen and Sawyer will provide contract documents for the purposes of soliciting price proposals from qualified contractors for the proposed sewer line construction. Bids received will be analyzed and a recommendation for award of construction contracts will be made. • During the construction phase, Hazen and Saywer will provide Construction Engineering Services in accordance with the County' s •. request for proposals . General administration of the • construction contact will include review and approval of shop drawings , approval of contractor payment request and preparation of change order, if required. Upon completion of the project , Hazen and Sawyer will certify substantial completion and furnish the County a reproducible set of "As Built" drawings. . Hazen and Sawyer will also provide a qualified project representative to monitor the daily construction activities . Generally, a full-time project representative is desirable for gravity sewer construction, although less intensive supervision can be provided if desired by the County. The project • representative working in combination with general supervision by our project manager will insure that construction is conducted in accordance with the contract documents . Client References Hazen and Sawyer takes pride in the fact that 70% of our business is derived from repeat clients. We feel our continued service to many clients is the best indicator of our capability to perform on important projects such as the sewer improvements proposed for Cheeks Township . Since we have never had the • • ii V • 012 Mr. Kenneth R. Thompson January 15, 1985 Page 7 • opportunity to work directly for Orange County, we strongly encourage you to contact any of our current or previous clients to determine their satisfaction with our services. The following 3 individuals are familiar with our work: Mr. W. Everett Billingsley, P.E. Executive Director • Orange Water and Sewer Authority P.O. Box 366 Carrboro, North Carolina 27510 Telephone: (919) 968-4421 • Mr. A.T. Rolan, Director V. Department of Water Resources City of Durham 101 City Hall Plaza Durham, North Carolina 27701 Telephone: (919 ) 683-4381 Mr. Carl M. Simmons, P.E. Director of Public Utilities City of Raleigh P.O. Box 590 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Telephone: (919) 890-3400 Mr. Gerald Holloman, Mayor Town of Holly Springs P.O. Box 8 Holly Springs, North Carolina 27540 Telephone: (919) 828-6292 ,41 Financial Arrangements We understand that this project will be funded by a combination of County funds, loans and grants from the Farmers Home Administration , and the Clean Water Bond Grant from the State of North Carolina. Hazen and Sawyer has worked previously and is working now under agreements funded by the Farmers Home "44-17(1 -1 Administration and are, therefore, familiar with their allowable compensation guidelines . If selected for this, assignment, we would agree to a fee established in accordance with the Farmers Home guidelines. ..„ 013 . ;A A, ,.. ..i:- ,.., . r . Mr. Kenneth R. Thompson ill • January 15, 1985 Page 8 - -.. . i 0 , - •-•. , A 71- Summary - . . We wish again to express our appreciation to the County for allowing us the opportunity to submit our proposal for ..-. • i • engineering services . We feel strongly that the experience of ' •.;4 our firm and project personnel makes us highly qualified for the •;'\• project . We further feel that we have the manpower resources 1 ready to commit to the project such that the required time schedule for extension of sewer service to Efland Cheek School g, can be met. We are available to answer any questions you have 1,1, concerning our proposal or our qualifications and invite you to • [ visit our office in Raleigh to become more familiar with our 1 e-ky facilities and personnel. If there are any questions concerning our proposal, please fee- to contact Mr. Donald L . Cordell , qt,• i P.E. , or myself. 1 . i Very truly yours, 1 . HAZEN AND SAWYER, P.C. 1.' °I', o ., 4, . • ''''' .1 . Gordon C. Rugg 1 Vice President .. 1 ..1 GCR/jhl .1 i tiV Enclosures 1.1 ., ...i i 0 , * -.A A • , • • J • • • • • 01.4 ORANGE COUNTY - BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agenda • ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Item No „ Meeting Date EEBRUARY 4, 1985 Subject: ORANGE COUNTY LEGAL SERVICES COSTS Department: Orange County Board of Commissioners Public Hearing: _Yes ZNO Attachment(s): • InforMation Contact; Yes - 3 Moses Carey/DonIlillhoit 1. . Chart of legal fees for Fiscal Phone Number: Extension 505 Year 1983-84 - Hillsborough - 732-8181- 2. Table XX from the Institute of Hillsborough - 732-9361 • Government publication "County Durham - 688-7331 Salaries in N.C." Mebane - 227-2031 3. Year-to-date legal fees Chapel Hill - 968-4501 Chapel Hill - 967-9251 PURPOSE: To provide cost data for staff attorney compared to current contractual costs. NEED: Orange County has primarily contracted for legal services with the firm of Coleman, Bernholz, Dickerson, Bernholz, Gledhill and Hargrave since 1974. The County has also engaged the services of other Orange County lawyers or firms for specific services during this period. The question of comparative costs of hiring in-house staff and contracting for legal services has been raised several times in the past. This analysis provides a comparison of Orange County's cost experience for legal services with that of other North Carolina counties which are involved in vigorous land use, planning and zoning activities. It also compares Orange County's actual and projected cost experience under a contracted legal services arrangement with a hypothetical scenario of expected costs if the county had hired a staff attorney beginning in July 1984. According to the Institute of Government, there are no objective criteria determining when a county has reached the point where they should hire one or more staff attorneys. Satisfaction with their legal service in meeting actual county legal needs appears to be the primary determinant of the form of legal service adopted. Orange County is seventh in rate of growth among North Carolina counties during the last ten years. This has resulted in increasing emphasis on land use controls, planning, and zoning. According to the Institute of Government, Orange County is also • among the top five counties statewide in its efforts to vigorously implement these land use, planning and zoning plans. 015 • • The other four counties in this category are Guilford, Mecklenburg, Forsyth, and Wake. Orange County's net legal services cost for 1983-84 was • $57,699.78 (see attachment 01). The actual legal services cost (excluding secretarial and other non-personnel costs since all • four have at least two staff attorneys) of the above named counties for 1982-83 and projected figures for subsequent years are as follows. (see attachment #2): PCIUAT, 23(:=Ea 10% INFLATION 1982-83 1983-84 1984-85 Guilford Co. - (2 staff atty.) $59,724 $65,696 $72,266 Mecklenburg Co. (2 staff atty.) 59,966 65,962 72,558 Plus Firm on Retainer Forsyth Co. (3 staff atty.) 123,009 135,309 148,840 Wake Co. (3 staff atty.) 93,784 103,162 113,478 As noted above, thee 1982-83 actual figures and those projected do not include secretarial and other non-personnel costs. They • were, however, considered normal for these counties for the year they were reported to the Institute of Government. These costs • also do not reflect the quality or effectiveness of the services for which they were paid. • During the current fiscal year under its contracted legal services arrangement, Orange County has expended a net of $23,647.07 for services (see attachment #3). If this trend continues (barring unexpected litigation), the county can expect to incur an approximate net cost of $50-55,000 for fiscal 84-85. This figure is substantially below that projected for counterparts which are vigorously pursuing planning and zoning activities. In considering whether the county would be better off hiring one or more staff attorneys, it is recognized that factors other than net economic cost must be considered. However, only economic cost will be considered here. If the county had hired • a staff attorney at the beginning of the 1984-85 fiscal year, the following costs could have been expected: 1. Attorney salary $38,500 plus 17% Fringes $45,045 2. Secretary (half tine) $7,000 plus 17% Fringe 8,190 3. . Telephone, copying, supplies 2,200 4. Travel and mileage 1,200 5. Periodicals and dues 2,000 6. Office space, 600 sa. ft. @ $6/sq.ft. 3,600 • Annual Cost $62,235 • 016• • First year only costs: 7. Capital cost (office equipment) $ 2,500 E4 Legal library (modest figure) 6,500 $71,235 Annual contingency: 9. Budgeted reserve for unexpected litigation 15,000 Total $86,235 It appears from the above analysis that the County's current - legal services arrangemnt is both cost effective and • economical. From all indications the County is pleased with the quality of the services provided under its current contract. Therefore, there is-no need for further consideration of hiring in-house legal staff at this time. IMPACT: None RECCMMENDATION: Continue with present contract for legal services. • • • ! 017 At•tachmen:t `1 - - - LI LEGAL FEES FISCAL YEAR 1983/84 - FIRM GROSS AMT, LESS AMT. NET w of expenditures - reimbursed " • Coleman Bernholtz Dickerson: 1059004 General County 46,502.47 46,502.47 1054504 Support Enforcement 3,786.00 (2839.50) 946.50 • ' 1054057 Tax Foreclosures -9,199.07 - (5815.39) 3,383.68 1060204 Social Services 1,100.00 • 825:00 275.00 r TOTAL, 60,587.54 9 . 9 51,107.65 J. ANDERSON LITTLE: 1060204 Social Services 16,630.72 (12473.04) 4,157.68 HOGUE &• STRICKLAND: Community Development 1,858.87 (1858.87) - 0 - Tharrington, Smith & Har9rave: .- General County 458.75 - 0- 458.75 Michael Brough General County 1,975.70 - 0 - 1 ,975.70 TOTAL 81,511.58 (23,811.80) 57,699.78 I r xtfum: . COUNTY SALARIES IN NORTH CAROLINA - 1984.. TABLE XX., COUNTY ATTORNEY i • INSTITUTE OF GOVERNMENT January 1984 A`1" L'FiMEI�*� #2 • ; . Pali- Fiscal Year Amount as Reason O time 1982-1983 Compared Yf Services Covered Departments Served County Salary Retainer Fees Utth Past Higher. by Retainer by•County Attorney Alamanee $31,380 normal ABCp� y 68 assistant 25,9 Alexander $3,600 0 normal • cede ABDEFCHIJOP Alleghany 0 $35 hour' lower ABCDEHILO Anson 2,660 normal a ABCDEFGIJL . 'Ashe 5,00D normal bode£ ABCDECHIJL Avery 1,800 4,995 higher •4 b A80080811. • Beaufort 8,844 3,549 oormal aedef ABCDEFGH7:L Bettie 6,000 . 19,902 normal aedef •all • Haden 3,600 3.021 higher 2 SC all • Brunswick 33,000 normal. ABCDEFd1IK Buncombe. • 46,189 normal - ADEFCHIJRQHOP aas'C vacant Burke $100 mtg. $45 hour higher 4 a ABDEFCIUXLOP • ' Ccbarrua 6,000 0. normal cede • • ABODEHJ Caldwell 3,300 24,170 higher 4 a ABCDEFH[RtaD Camden • 2,316 higher • 4 . Dada A8CDEHt.^ • • • Carteret • 1,200 17,500 normal. a(regular) ABCOEFHJBl.QS • Caswell 5,100 1,400• higher 1 bode ABCOEGIn,^ Catawba 7,000 7.764 normal code all , • • staff 28,218 Chatham 12,000 7,642 normal cede ABCDECRELo•I Cherokee 3,763 15,983 normal ccdf AC • Mama. 1.200 normal e c ABCDECHOP 1 Clay 1,800 2,040 lover scdeE ABCDEFCIJO • Cleveland • • 0 13,140 higher 1 std ASCOEHLO Columbus 9,840 per case normal aedef all _, Craven 1,800 33.900 • normal aedef all Cumberland • 45,000 higher 2 all etaff'30,184 • • 1 Corricuck 1,800 11,123 normal a *11 Dare 32,970 • normal ABCDEJi1K10a Davidson 17,220 63,866 normal • aedf all S • Davie 10,200 3,000 normal aedef • AHCDE3 LO• •• Duplin 12,708 4,120 normal aedef ail Durham att'y 43,836 normal all ' Attoraey I1 28,560 Attorney 1 23,616 I Edgecombe 15,546 0 aortal aedef ABCOEF0H8L 54,828 normal • all i Forsyth -� asst 35,692 • e aas'e 32,489 ' Franklin • 6,085 normal cede all Gaston 18,000 •aed • all &sec 25,297 v., Cates 723 0 normal be £8811200 • Graham 1,800 $40 hour • lower aedef all Granville 6,300 4,500 normal • a ABCDEFGIL Greene 14,400 0 uormal aode ABCDEGHIJO • . • 1 Guilford step r deputy 31,680 all ,, aas't 28,044 ' • , Halifax 5,175 2,774 normal aedef ABCDEL Harnett. 3,600 25,492 Lover a ABCDEFGBIJKLHO Haywood 3,000 7,868 higher 5 bcdcf all •Hendersne • 6,689 0 lover cede A _ ' Hertford 2,400 2,747 normal • are ABCDECKKL • . Hoke 1,200 3,973 • normal aedef all - • Hyde 0 $30 hour aortal all Itched! 7,800 11.144 higher I ace ABCEFHIJK4pP • • m 'Jackson 6,000 aurma2 • aedef ABCDEFGIUKL • 1 Johnston $2,400 $6,000 higher 1 Ddeg A •Jones 4,800 25,320 higher 1 aode ABCDEFHKLP I Lee 6,840 normal bcdafh Ai/COD/ILO . - Lenoir 8,,781 9,987 normal aedef ABCDE Lincoln 5,100 2,233 normal aode all McDowell 4,200 2;500 normal bedef all Macon 3,000 633 normal oaf . ABCDEFGHIJKLO • • Madison 1,200 0 normal aedef ABCOEFCHILOP Martin 4,200 6,136 normal bedef ABCDEU• Mecklenburg' 42,000 normal aed all Attorney IL 33,007 • • Attorney I 26,953 • • • ' 019 • • • • Full- Fiscal Year. Amount as Reason time _ 1982-1983 Compared if Services Covered Departments served • County. Salary Retainer. Fees • With Past Higher . by Retainer bin County Attorney • Mitchell 800 $40 hour normal bedef ABCDER0 liontgomery 600 3,060 normal - bedef ARCDEFCH/KLOVXY c"z Moore 3,600 11,400 normal ace ABCEPGHIJKLP Nash 9,693 2,371 normal acd all , New Hanover 42,206 ABCOEFWIJKL. ' assistant 29,307 staff 22,402 Northampton 3.600 3,566 normal acdef ' A • Onalou 10,320 44,686 . normal aedef ABCDEPHIJ$LNO - ' Orange 25,000 36.41l normal acdef all • Pamlico - 7,884 lower aedof all • Paegootamk 2,440 11,398 normal ae ABCDECIOSLOT Bender ^ • 8,126 normal bode ABCDEFCHIJK Perqutmans- • Person 4,410 8,984 higher 1,5 acdef ABCDEIUKLOV • Pitt 15,060 normal. acdef • ABCOEFHKL . Polk. 5,000 • 300 normal aedef all Randolph county manager until January 31 - ADBFIWI O tiebe.ond 5,100 18,309. normal • eedef A, -ma Robeson 19,272 18,468 normal atdef ABCOEFC83t0 Rockingham. 18,000 3,960 normal acdef 'ABCDEILW . _ lbws* , 7,751 1,588. lover acdef ' - ABCDEPHIJL • • , . Rutherford 6.930 • 20,930 normal • a ABCDEHIJLO • • • Sampson 0 - $45 hoot normal ACAA • ' ' Scotland • 2,500 938 normal - a alt • Steely 2,000 18,298 higher 1 dedef ell- ' Stakes 4,000 1,230 • lower beds, ABCEPCHJKLO • ' Seery 2,400 6,489 • normal a 88. Swain 1,800 normal bedef ABCDEFCHJO Transylvania 3,000 7,000 normal • adde ` ABCDEFHIJOI' Tyrrell 2,200 normal be ABCOECIIKT Union • Vance 4.284 12,909• higher 5 as ABCDECL Wake 40,600 higher 2 ABCEFCHIJKLgo . aes't 27.216 - • - asset 25,968 • . Warren 2,886 1,561 lower • acde ABCDEFCHL Washington 2,100 19,327 normal beds ABCDEFCNIJKI. Watauga 0 $50 hour normal ABCOEIJgI, ' Wayne 25,956 higher 2 acdef ABCDEPHKLRCC ' . Wilkes 11,219 2,702 normal acdef. ABCOEFHJKLQ Wilson 0 normal ABCDECHKLO Yadkin '2,150 0 normal acde ABCDEFJKLOZ • Yancey 2.093 1,504 . normal bedef • ABCECHJO • 1 . 1. unusual litigation or complex business transaceiona F. public health . • 2. subetential increase in salary or retainec • C. social services • 3. unusual number of tax foreclosurea - B. board of elections • 4. additional services requested by board of commissioners I. public library 5. include, payment, to more than one attorney J. recreation K. planning L. inspections . a. attendance at all regular and special-meetings of H. all departments the board of commissioners N. mental health b. attendance at commissioners' meetings only upon request 0. emergency medical services • e. availability for routine consultation with board of U. all except those omitted A through 0, which were I. consissionera a department heads • listed.on the questionnaire d. drafting ordinances a resoLutions ' Q. harbor eommission i e. preparation of routine legal documents R. public works (deed*, simple contracts, etc.) S. airport authority E. preparation of legal advertisements T. water system - I g. availability for routine consultation with board u. economic development • of commissioners V. veterans' services h. serves as clerk to board of county commissioners W. auditorium • X. agricultural extension ' • Y. animal control A. board of tomminslonere 6 administration Z. landfill 1 8. tax supervisor AA. others with approval of manager C. tax collector 88. all except library and cancel health 0. sheriff cc. separate pay for social services 1 E. register of deeds _ -Attachment #3 • C20 YEAR-TO-DATE LEGAL FEES JULY •1, 1984 - DECEMBER 31 , 1984 FIRM GROSS AMT LE-SS AMT . NET - of expenditures reimbursed Coleman Bernhol tz Dickerson: 1059004 General County 21,773.83 - 0 - 21,773.83 1054504 Support Enforcement 1,175.94 .( 881.95) 293.99 1054057- Tax Foreclosures 2,956.44 (2956.44) -0- TOTAL 25,906.21 -. (3838.39) 22,067.82 J. Anderson Little: • 1060204 Social Services 6,317.00 - (4737,35) 1,579,25 - Ho9ue & Strickland Community Development 3,840.00 (3840.00) -0- TOTAL 36,3)63.21 (12416.14) 23,647..07 • • • • • , ORANGE COUNTY . 021 „*. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA •1•-•- _- . ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NO_Ell - MEETING DATE February 4, 3985 • . . . • SUBJECT: PROPOSED THOROUGHFARE PLAN FOR ORANGE COUNTY AND PUBLIC OPINION SURVEY FOR CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP ;; ...:_....... DEPARTMENT:. PLANNING . ----I 1 PUBLIC HEARING: YES x NO ____ . _ ATTACHMENT(S) : Map of Joint Planning Area INFORMATION CONTACT: Gene Bell ' showing extent of Chapel Hill-Carrboro . • Thoroughfare PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH - 732-8181 ' - oroughfare Planioutiine of Development' • Characteristics Planning Approach; and HILLSBOROUGH - 732-9361 . . memorandum concerning consultant contacts. • • . CHAPEL HILL - 967-9251 • t • MEBANE - 227-2031. = ; . - DURHAM - 688-7331 - -.-- iT • . PURPOSE: TO consider, (]) requesting -the N.C. Department of Transportation to prepare • ' • ". • a Thoroughfare Plan for Orange County with priority being given to thegoifit Planning Area, and (2) contracting with a consultant for the preparation of ' : . • a Public Opinion 'Survey in Chapel.Hill Township to serve as a mean S of iden- - , tifying Joint Planning concerns of area residents. ; • . . . . . . . • NEED: The Planning. Department hes.initiated work on the Jcsint Planning Area Plan with -. - • Chapel Hill/Carrboro. There are six (6) Major components.goinganto_the pro- . duction of the plan. These are identification of development intensity districts, determination 'of location standardi/ population projections, public opinion •. - - ' ' . survey. thoroughfeie''Plan, and identification of utility service 'areas. Chapel , Hill is responsible for the population projections and OWASA is responsible. for • the identification of .utility service areas. . Orange County is responsible.for - the remaining components. Locational standards will take the 'form of an issUe paper and will be produced in-house. Development intensity 4strict-alwill be determined using the Development. Characteristics Planning Approach. ' • - -. - . - . • The Development. CharacteriStics Planning Approach involves mapping and over,- laying selected environmental paraMeters. The districts that emerge in the overlaying process represent areas of varying environmental Constraints.• Next, - -- . - . _ . development intensity type classificatiohs are applied'to the districts. These •. . . . - classifications determine the type and intensity of land use that will be- -: • . allocated to each dittriCt in the .larid use plan. This approach was approved at a meeting of the managers and planning directors of the re'spective .juris- • 0 . - dictions on January 22, 3955- - . . . • • The Chapel Hill/Carrboro Thoroughfare Plan was -:s adopted by the N.C. Board of . Transportation in September, 1984. The Plan does not cover the entire Joint , Planning Area (see attached map) , but stops approximately three (3) miles .• - from the boundary of the Area. If adequate planning is to be undertaken, an • • . extension of thoroughfare planning efforts to encompass the entire area is - necessary. . -. In addition to the Joint Planning Area, thoroughfare planning for the entire' cdunty is needed. This derives from increasing development applications in • the Hillsborough area and the adoption of a Land Use Plan and zoning in .the • • West Orange area. Given the projected development in those locations, adequacy of the street network must be examined and long-range improvements identified. ' . • ...--- „., 022 ACTION AGENDA ITEM NO. PAGE 2 ,- ,.. A second factor to be considered in the preparation of the Joint Planning Area Plan is the land development concerns of citizens in, and adjacent to, the Joint Planning Area; particularly, their concerns related to type and intensity of development. Traditionally, the planning staff has determined such concerns 1 through the use of questionnaires and public meetings as needed. In this case, staff time is limited, schedules tight, and issues complex. it is felt that a ;7 professional in public opinion surveying can provide the best and most accurate data within our time constraints. IMPACT: The Planning and Research Branch of NCDOT has indicated that work on a Thorough- fare Plan could begin upon receipt of a letter from the Commission Chair. ,1 Priority would be given to the Joint Planning Area with the remainder of the County to be completed within a three-month period. Approval of NCDOT preparing the Thoroughfare Plan would enable this element to be considered in the Joint Planning efforts and could he carried out at no cost to the County. Long-range thoroughfare improvements could also be considered County-wide and needed im- provements considered as part of development application approvals. The issues and concerns identified in the public opinion survey will serve as the major input to the determination of goals and objectives for the Joint Planning Area Land Use Plan. Identified goals and objectives will in-turn I have a direct impact on the location and inteitities of land uses proposed in the Plan. r RECOMMEND: Authorize Chair to contact NCDOT and request Thoroughfare Plan preparation for Orange County (NCDOT will prepare at no expense to the County) . '.4 Authorize Planning Department to contract with Focusgroup, Inc. for the preparation of a public opinion survey involving 300-400 respondents. Estimated cost - $4,000-$5,000 (funds available in Planning Department budget) . t I , _ , I --- ,..., Iv • \ „, ,, , ............,_ ..............i.:er, _ i,. ‘, .., ....: ..:-.1r:• .- . • • - 0 2 3 : .•:: ..,.... :- .,..... F . ..r ,% r..::,:••• ,...: ...,:::::• :: : ::::, : :-,...:::::::::.•?..:,..,;A I . 7..... ..:..,..::::::::.:::-::::.::::•:.::.:::::::::::.:::,-.:;:::";,::::::::..;.:::.::::::::::::-..,:-::::,-.. , ` I . .„„,\. ::i..1:-:.....-';::::...::::...:.-..' V5::.:..f.-..-- ..-,-.:-i•-•:::::•::::1 --------. ,;-..;* •:-:,:z::•:.,,e.„7-,,..:: , ::-:-.-:,.-,.--:-..:•..: . 11111 . ...ii. .•:, ....:::• .. .,::::::::::::::::: „:,,...---....,.....:::::::::::•-..::•-•.:....:::.......:.::::::•,::-.:.....::.•. .-r ..i.:::::.„:::;•::?::;:;::::::::::.,....i:„ •,...; 1 ..,. .i:::-.::::.;;..•:..1.5:::::::::.:::::.:.::::::.....:i::::::::::.:,::::::.::::::':,=,.:‘•-•-„r..:::ii.'::.:....:.::..',..g:::::•:::::::::::::•...•..:,;•...::•.,..:::.4 Al..... < X ':,:i:',?:,: • • g ..._,,,_ / '-'1 N-.. '...::::.::i.'Qiiii::*:•V,:::::di':." : : .• ,...', ..s;;;;;6.„:':•.:'•::::•'"..:::: .:,.; : . ••••:::;g41,:l ! .......:,. <;:.••f.,".•••• - • . . .,. . . 1,jal ..:.....i,....:,::,::1;:::•:!!;E::: :..i;•ii ::',;.: ,,,......... ., .. ......, ...„,,_, . • • •• .....::::•:::••::,;:::: W 4., 2 .,. I ...:1P:::::::.:": * ;f:::::::::ii:.:?::.:.:...,.....::'11:.:‘ .-•;:i. N. ;....' 1.,::: ._. • .2.•- -: ''::::::.'::::: :. .... : . ,:::.,,::. :::;.:...;::::: ...::;::•. ' • ... : l...1...::..:.:::.:..,:--..:,-. .. ,.. - •. r:-.-• .....: ......., :•:::::••::: • • - -::.:::" :::.:::........ ....-:. ..,..::...:. •....-,-.... • .-..r.,:-.... 7,-.......-,... ...:::.::...::.. A ,. . ••;:•:•'•::•:•'-••••::;•-*.:.:•:•:•:;•:•:::••... •.-•:•:::•:,:•::•:•:::i:•.-:,:.: • .r.44.7i.n.17 ::::: - ••t* '`r .... ...-• r- . • '..' oo. .ot;-:::j;,:;.i6.,,:i:iii:;:;:;i:, ::"':::-;•.;,:::;:.:::::•"r r•.! . : . •''tft1*!:::i.• :'"•* '.'''..:.:1.,•, ''', ' -°,-.-r-:. r - -' :'''''.• ..• ."'-5- A.::::::: :::::::: r. 1%. ::::.:::::::•::::::,!•::::::•:.f.:. '':-:.'-. :::::E.E;:::::::.:E;K:E.:.:E...:::-.Y.E-E:--;!:.:::: r,1st '•.::.•,. . ...:.:::::i.g.:.: i : :::R:::;:::::;::::::::;:;:;:i.:''....,.-.*:.--........ .E :. . -ial:If.E.„ ::„:7'..E. ::::.*....,::::;':;;;;;;;::::,:iEr.::";":::::i'f;iii ?, •i:Ef:...2.(':":1---• (.0141 ..- : :::::::::.":::EZ*:.:•:::::$::::::::i.::::::::::::::.::::.:.::;:;::::::::,- 74:::.:-....:.:----'-. . ......:-.............-...-.-....... ..., • . . .-,- ::::::.E.::::::.::::',E.::,.:::::,::::).::::::::::::::::.::;::•:::.::::EM:,E,- - ..::::::::::.ie.,-E'rE:::%::;::.4:.::'1'E.:;;;;;;E., ,:::::: `i...,re ,.:•:::„iei:=::::::::::::;;;;:::,:-..,.i.,■:76iii;4{.;' 1 , t. ' : .".51t,: ;:iliaginsigiia5i:.iffillilit,..1.;;;.,4".; : •..:;;;i ‘-. •Fr ,.:,:4:*.......*:;...;:,i..:-„.>". ,`-t ;;;Vi‘c ...:?'*";4.1; .!fl ' Z / §..:::::;ii';;P...f.iii:".a......iini::::ifiiiig.:::::i:a.:..,..:.:::,.:-.....:.;;;V::<-;,/,ii2.;W:ii::::i:;.... ";.::.. r... -4,?.t-;'''''''''•-•''`-.`"7 ,. 41111111111411 .;:•:::;;;,:tkir,;:,...,E;;;;:::..1i1:::-;E;;;E:M:;;:::ii;::.;1:::.::::;:;:;•::::;:;:*;:1::::.;::::::;:;:;IEil. -::•••,...?.i.:'•-,E:E;;;;;;;:ii:Fi:.E.-..-: .:::.... vr-a,,,, ;._. .,; 1, I.1.' ef....:::;;;:;i:::::aii:.;I:ii,;;P::::...- ;i-ril: ::::::::igNI.:;:gr::;44 •':?-:;;:;:;::P ,.'::•....:::..::. ?..."--57.z..7 l'Ilfirm..irt_16=141:. itt:/4142.x. ' z tx, / . ,. t.,:.• rge.::::2;f:&::::4::::.:::::,::.::::::::::::::::: :::1:::::::::::::.::::::::::::::mg:Iimiii:2„::::::::::::;.......:..:::::::::i::::.:.::::::::::„.,- ".••••,,:. ...--,;...„...;._„: „.-_:.....t, . .„„..- ..... ;',;'-71 z A ::.::::::.g,:::ii.::::::::•ii:::::::::::::::::::::....,............• ..:::::::::::::::::::: ..... . .......,.. . . ::.: -•- 'S4e• ...„. : 2";_NI- 'r .... '10.-144Z.:-Y1'.• ... ., ;.•.:,. ...::.::::::::::i:::::::::::;:i.:4::::::::::::::: ::::&: min::::: :::::::::iii-..:,::::::::::::,:.,::::i::;......,::::::::::::::4 :1, . .. .g.:5,1zk_-.7---...:- 7..--_.., ...,I• .;',..:, "..... ..4„'.-; .i...::::•,:::iiiiiiii1::::::::::::::K:..:::::i:..;:::::::;:,-:;;;...-...-,:i....••..••" •:::.:::::::.::; ... • ...?„.,•,.:.....-.......:-:-:-:•:•.• __;.. _--_--.....;,-.:°- 7..f,...: ':', .: . --Z-7.:-Z-L-....-__'..; - ift .-..--...,. --ri , otej U .. . - •er .•• , ...',.:;:i:::::::::::::i:=_ii:::::•:::-::::,:i:::::::: :::::.:::•:.••:::::::::::::::::•:::::::imc.::::::•::::* :::::::0-'-v•. .:-:-.:- N,....,,..,-- .. •ix t. f-M-- - _ .41,..,,.., ,: , _., -•••• •.•••• ••••••••.. • .......... . ....•. ...•. EL ................. ,.... ............ ......,....... ......,.. .... • .,....... . ..•::: :..:::::,:::::::::::::::::::iist,...!„..i, 1, „, ..7_._2„-:„„..::::::__,.,_:._.____.:. ./.......„,...;w,...,;„ ki ,.. ....-. :: : : : ::::::::;::::::wa.:. ::.-; ....,x;k7.1fiiir.,-. 1,,,:7:.?..--1,-4.‘" ::::: ---:;:::--,--:-:--- : - /4. --1,444- ,,,"1 :: loilpgallisi::::: 9:e ::;: tf " Fd .• :- =:-.----"- -.1.*.:-..--72:7-7. :-...:-.--:---:"1::".•:-;:. i.-- . .:::::i:::::::,..:::.,:,,,,zi„,.„..„:„:„.,..........:.:.:.:.:•:::::::,..:.:::::4,.:•:...„...... _ ,.,•• ..... , 0. ...r:::: :...gi:•:.:::111:4Zr:.:ii:i::ii:iiiii;::::MA.,:i.VA,*•,:nig .,i-::•: ,;.:. ;',..:4'''.,,;.'•-.7,> -,-.:-..-; '-* .._- __-•-_•'_. 4.,...,,.....l-' ' - .,_---•:::::.'-':"....1" ....4 Li .. • .,.... • _..g,..„,..t.1.7.,• ____ .. . . •••.::::„.......:.::::...:::.,.... „.spx...::::::::::::...:::::::.::::i.::::,:.::.::::::::::.::::::4.::::::::::: :::::::::.:. .. .„:„......_7„.„,,:;:,.....k.,....... _____:_:._...__.. _ _......_ ___ _:.... ...77 .:...72::_. •..,.... .,......................... •. ... ••..•.......,......................,.....w.,_ .„....., ,. ....... .......„"...."............................„ ..."...."""""".. . . ..._ .. .. . ._ _____ .,... _____ ...cha,ii.,:l. .7__._____: ___•:.. :••.... ....„ _. :_. _.z. .-..-E•fig..--- ._--..:: ':.-.7-',7,-..:'---" :::'.1.- . • • •••••••••••-•••• •• .....•.••....,.................•. . i''' .:•.,....::::::,:;::::::::■*:*:::•:::::: ::•:::v......,•••••••••••••••••••••,•••••••••••••••••••••••, ,......,,....,...14 ,..___._ _. .. ,. , .. ................ •...... • ............... . . ........_ . .., . ......:::::::::::...:::::::.:::::::::............••......:„.:.:...„:„..„3:::::„..::::::::„.._.:::„....:...:.:,..„...,.._... _____ ______ .__ ..,.....•_•. . ._______:._ _ _..___ :.,..::_i, f. ...„....:•:::„.:•ii::......:::::::::::::...:...;....:„.........:::::::: :::::::„.:*i,.:„....i„,....„:::::::::;:i:::...„.„:::::::::*:.*:.. _...e..,iitii..._._ ..,.. .:__ ,._.. ............._____:_:.„...z...... ,_ .•___ 4:4„..„.7...,:.••••• .. ..,.,.....:•:.::::::::.:::::„...•„:„:„:.:::::::::•....:,;:.i::iii.:::: v:.f:?..,. .:::::::::::1:::::::::::::::....:::.i::::::::..::::::• _____..,__.__. ..... .. , __._......_-_ -:__.. .___„....__ _•_:. _.............4--''',.'r* . .....t.. * , :, :::!....!ii:.,:;?.;,:qif;V:::,:*,:::*,.,',:::::::::::::::::i::::::::::M;:.;::•:::;:ffijiiii:ii'::::::■*:,:,:-..:::::::::::::::::;: V.-7......-7:::::7-%.,-?,::::..... -..._.•.c..--:.:_--__:::::_.- -.).:1..:...; t . ..:...*::::,:::,::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::.:;.::::.::::::::::::i:::::::::.:::::i:::::::: ::-.*...,.;:iiii;:ii,::.:: ::::i.:;:::;::...:::.,iiiv.....,...,: ......,tt... ,,,,,.. •-::--. -.:-..:.;_:-:.._ --.7"\-,:- '- •. ::*:',' ..:::,::::'::::.:::: ::::;::::i...- -,:.,..:;::::.:::'....:;....::'.:.::.'''''''.:*.":..x.'.......;;;.•:.:::::::::::;:;:;:;:::::::;::::;:;:;,:0;:•-•:::'''.:*:".:,..;,.--..-'•:: :.: '.z.L."5/--;::r•t■ilt:4ffi.:::.=-----' .•* *. 3 --,--- :.'_.'_:,... . ...•:•••'.":*i:::.:.*:....::i::::::::.:E::;*':::;:;:i.:::::,':;:.;:',::::;:':::::-Ei.;:".:M:•::::;•::;:i,:::',?:::s0...•::..:.:::::%-;;I::::,4*?;..• '''...i, t!......,*.-.,7-7,Mli1/4---•-::* ._ .''' -...._:::_if: .l.2 .i::... ,. :.1 CO , . :. .4":.:.,;?. P 4t.r4 :.;17::.14.:,Vt.'.-.--■;;;;;:i";:c-.--' '''1,::..,......:!F:.: '..:.:.: :*:I.,i':''':;:.P4.0"„ini;': ::::P'i:':ii5:::::;',.:,:g:i....:::;:ii:..";:i':::::.0:1:■":0.4.:;;;:t.):"...-."''.:K::::::;.:::.:.:::::.:: .7 .. .]::gi:l..::::.:?...:-.::.:Mtlr''::::::::::::::.:.::::.:Eli:':::::-:-. .::::!)'#;,::;;;;E::;:;:::;•:F•4...;•.-:.::,'OR)::;:;::**:::::::::::::i'd?.....,„..:. ;..-:.7:1-.....,;•:,.. -.1E, . ..•*. , ':::'gE.::.:,:::::''''''''''--...::::.:'::::'::::::•;:EiE:'.'-.'-7::::::::::•::::::•.':.'+'%':::::::!::::'...:..ii.-,,,.... -::::::::::::::::::::::>;.x.:.7,7.. ...;. -.-...-r;., . I,.:v..;:.:i,:::::*,t..,::;:i, 1::: :::;::::.:::::::::::::::::... ;:,,,,,:•:•:.;;T:•::::::.■::::: 4.....',,,,-.:,;.::::,.: ,:rs,,!:;,:f::::*,:::::::,,if,:' ' :::„ : :::.:g:::8:.. . -•::::::0:::::::::::::::.::::::::::.. .:_.;,,,-..-:•.. ...:-..._:::::.:::0::::::::::::::::::.: I :.:.. 0 CE. :iii:::::::::::.:2,.....ii.;:::::::::::::i7..!.:• :::::::::8::::.t.:;:,‘,,.4:::::enier.: i,..,::::,:tiw ::::::::::::::::::::::::::4::::::: ._.:::::::::_ .c.:,i..:... ::::::::::::m...i.:0::...w.. • .........,_ ....... :...- .....,.......-....-.k.:....i.....:::2::...:.:-....::::::::::::::::. ....:....:.:. .,::,;:::::::::::::a:,:::::;-:::: ::,.....; ., . fr: ..:.....,..,::::::::::- :::?-:-,.:::::::::•:::::•:.::::::::i:::::::::::::;:::...,::;:ii.:::::::::::::m::„.„.:::0..:,...:• .:::::::w•:::::.1:::::::::..... ... :: :. : ....:::::::: tf.:::::;:::::, :::: 1:ii::..:::..*: ::::::::::. ::::::1.1;:v:0:.::04:44<.*:,:isk4 :i::::::::eB-:::::?.:::::.:.::::::::::::.:::pogsf. :;::.i:.:::,.:i:!ssgs ., :?::N:::: ::,.:::::::::::.::,:.::::•:::::::.::::::::.:::•L::::::4.:140.::..1: . . •: „:::•:::::•.::_:::.:.:.„•: ,.,„. ..•• • _ _ ,.. .„4. :,. .:::;::.:: .::::.. L.::1:...;......-...:.*- • * • t• '-' (;a RURAL BUFFER COMMERCIAL TRANSITION ....\ .4) PUBLIC INTEREST AREA EXISTING URBAN. Scale, ,--, ilsair:,:-. ...7....:311.111.11161 1 NORTH , • PROPOSED URBAN ; - • URBAN o 4000' 8000' 12000' \ 0 RURAL NEIGHBORHOOD NOV. 82' -- • . - L22.....d 10 YEAR TRANSITION . • . • . mis111111111131101111111mIllamisillaminal 20 YEAR TRANSITION Extent of Chapel Hill-Carrboro Thoroughfare Plan 1 m NEI Min lall MO nos Elsa WM Ian MO MI 1-40 Route • • • . • . PREPARED SY ORANGE CO. PLANNING OEPT. -- -: ,./ Li 24 DEVELOPMENT CHARACTERISTICS PLANNING • I. Overview • A. An alternative land use planning approach which does not prescribe a certain arrangement of uses for an area. B. Main thrust is environmental suitability analysis wherein selected area characteristic (environmental & transportation in particular) are mapped individually and overlaid. C. Overlaying produces composite maps which highlight districts capable of supporting various types and intensities of development. D. Hierarchy of development intensity types is defined and allocated to appropriate districts. • • • II. Mapping - 2 general categories A. Physiographic Characteristics (Basic source on items 1 & 2 is 1978 • USGS Chapel Hill quad map) Attachment 1 1. Slope (important in determining development intensity) a. 0-7% - High to moderate intensity development b. 7-15% - Moderate to limited intensity development c. Over 15% - 'Severely limited development potential Attachment 2 2. Slope Orientation (important for energy conservation) • a. warm slopes (E, SE, S, SW) • • b. cold slopes (N, NE, W, NW) Attachment, 3 3. Woodlands (important for balanced ecology & aesthetics; main sources:) a. 1979 aerial photos b. 1975 aerial photos c. Field survey Attachment 4,4A 4. Soils (based on A Planning Guide to the Orange County, N.C. Soils Survey) a. desirable - types la and lc b. marginal - types 2a, 2c, and 3 • c. undesirable - types 4,5,8,9 and 10 B. Accessibility Characteristics 1. Based on highway travel time in.feet per minute (FPM) a. interstate - 4840 PPM (55MPH) b. arterial - 3960 PPM (45 MPH) c. collector - 3080 FPM (35 MPH) Attachment 5 2. Travel time contour maps produced for every major interchange and town center (activity node) in study area. Attachment 6 3. These maps are used to produce a composite map of the study area (relative accessibility levels map) where accessibility contours are grouped into 4 levels ( 1 = most accessible. ..4 = least accessible). * Kaminsky, Jacob. How to Evaluate a Development Proposal in Your Community. • Reston; Va. : Environmental Design Press, 1979. 174P. 132112111211101111111110••■ • (2) 025 III. Analysis Attachment 7 A. Physio-Access Districts Map 1. Produced by overlaying slope, orientation, woodlands, soils, and relative accessibility levels maps. 2. Defines 36 physiographic types, and their relative accessibility, based on: a. slope (values of 1 - 4) b. orientation - W (warm) or C (cold) c. T (trees on site) d. soil d - D (desirable), ,M (marginal), or U (undesirable) 3. Types identified by combination of the 4 physiographic characteristics, e.g. , 2WTM would be a district with 11 Jr, a. 5-10% slope lat b. warm slope orientation c. tree coverage d. marginal soils B. Designation of developement intensity types to physio-access IA" district type. 1. Working jointly with Chapel Hill and Carrboro development•intensity types are defined and applied to Table 1. 2. In general, development intensity types falling in the upper left quadrant of the table are most suited to high • A intensity development while those falling in, the lower right are least suited. C. Development Intensity Map 1. Using Table 1 "in conjunction with physio-access districts map, development intensity plan is derived. Attachment 8 2. With development map in hand, development of plan alternatives ; can proceed by applying the following: a. population projections b. location standards c. goals & objectives d. utility service areas It • t;zr, ; ' 04 • !!.) • ATTACHMENT 1 • 026 DEGREE OF SLOPE The impact of slope'steepness on development is manifested primarily in the level of intensity and building and parking coverage.Slopes in the planning area were grouped into four categories: 0-3 percent,3-8 per- cent, 8-15 percent and over 15 percent. (See the following map). Land in the 0-3 percent slope category, where slope is minimal, is most susceptible to high intensity development. Variations in development character in such areas can be attributed to accessibility of employment and • services as well as to anticipated demands. Areas with gently rolling topography (3-8 percent slopes) pro- vide a location for attractive, healthful development of moderate intensity. Appropriate development could occur in such areas with minimal disruption of the natural landscape. • Areas with somewhat steeper slopes (8-15 percent) can be developed, although topography may create grading, erosion and street alignment problems. From the point of view of amenity,air circulation and vistas, development could be extremely desirable in these areas..A medium intensity level of development is recommended, however, with correspond- ingly low building coverage. . Steep slopes, from 15 percent and higher, present the most severe development problems. In many cases, development in steep slope areas is economically unfeasible. However, under favorable climatic condi- tions slopes with 15-25 percent could be very desirable,as long as there were. minimal disturbances of the terrain and very low building coverage. A low - intensity level of development is recommended for such areas. RESERVOIR) �'."'1:�/t�;i'.iP��}:1':L:•: . y��✓". :` •-.`• F rt i ;''3�;.. DEGREE OF SLOPE �. i rt rcVr1" ,ff. IJ�ill 3-8% `J'� )1G ' B.,5% L'e't'lam 'Y♦ ,jL t T ' tin N tr,•.5;; ,- ,'�',j1.y` .r1Y•Iti'.. ,�[y�,:y.,N !";�y. ,�t't^\,f:'!ii \�.'.� 1.L', • ' :-:y ,_�t ti t 5:.;.`x)r_ ? +t"'',`r 7 i :!'1• •�;-•:•'\ �kJ `r� �:'%It!• �l-mot 3 "+ " z o j .r, j: 2000 O u�;(1r r, \r..f.� i ;'#,.r r " • •.Lt.•. .,\~'/• SCALE 41 FEET llFi . �`rir�}r� 33;,{ 0.5 0 0.3 I q ty *. 4•y. �N k a �. • y. U14 h qy SCALE W WL£3 .;�a'c .,11ky l• a. to-.,;h r' i'%q'7' + rtl '< 1070 N 84 • • ATTACHMENT 2 • • • 02 / SLOPE ORIENTATION The micro-climate of areas with different slope orientations dif- fer depending upon the effects of solar radiation and wind direction. East- ern and southern slopes provide better habitats for people and plants since they receive more solar heat in the winter and cooler breezes in the summer. Northern and western slopes, on the other hand, receive less solar heat and more cold wind in the winter. Development plans prepared on the basis of the variations in micro-climate of different slopes could result in significant reductions in heating and cooling costs,as well as conserving energy. Energy conservation is a critical need today and will be even more so in the future. Therefore, every effort should be made to conserve energy. For these reasons it is suggested that the higher intensity development be located on southern slopes and less intensive development on northern slopes. The planning area was divided into eight categories on the basis of slope orientation. In the physiographic summary for the planning area, the eight groups were combined into two categories;warm slopes, including eastern, southeastern, southern and southwestern;and cold slopes, including northern, northeastern, western and northwestern.The following map shows . slope orientation in the case study area. SLOPE ORIENTATION LIBERTY )'r i.t• :^bri•.a. :N I RESERVOIR I u'�- 1 ^'r+•�' \ I f I /•E�%%% ' is JJ i �'r so yc :: • ea •w7is 'J"'r ;Jft�R,r I 'L9 N"' il µ, yyyy .:5,-;11:31,4. '.�r:�'.,` •�,: .g A e •. -17;11• p'4I7y�1.° �t'� :'i n� 44` 'tjiiifllig-.4 : 7- 7r4 ✓ I iii 'm''. NORTHERN—COLD ��,,I ,SOUTHERN-WARY/ .31,U�..,i.•t�;SEit:Sl-"icy "tr'ra^ .Yr U�J �,�^,�� I>'+�t, '+$xifa `��',`��' $LOPE '. \< SLOPE �/'� ((:..• •{+`''1476:'' I\ 'I, 3 U,i-�Z Ate '�''n�,y'. 'r,''t?z;''"-. W,- ,/1Iy{(k '&t. ! is 4 , • .6/ \,'•`�s .04- �;u".:mac... 41 _•-?s:./� � _x•:_". '-/2 rr•�C•:. �: q i':'t'}__ '.M v'�: ,�,=;:w`�_:::;t,, r,.1.,,-..`:%911.,y:. -�• •_=-Y'.�•*'.,' rp`�I i• 3 r.s • .r r i - + :'f:-.14.,::.--.. r'� a'.;;^'' :' �~N 7 a!x� 'ut• � , .: , • I;'».._ i t ' '''. r"ila,,,kr.:-, - ,4 -�_,4We + . ■ 1u- 110 , id -,, `. • •• k.. r�• i ip Ll%-t1"1 ` �lt ' r :1 " N. t' t,....» A a%,� � ir . i , y ' ' , , _e . 1 . . _ _000 i i SCALE LI FEET +$y I ' a6 4 I 1 i SCALE M IM.EII I-70N J/ ■ 85 � . . , ' . ATTACHMENT 3 ' �� . . , �� . . � : . UVOODLANDS ' . `�— ' Plant materials are needed for the balanced ecology of the natu- ral environment and the beauty they provide to the built environment.Trees . can moderate extreme temperatures, absorb smoke and dust, reduce wind velocity, and increase visual privacy. If properly related to buildings, trees can also reduce the amount of energy needed for cooling and heating. While the importance of tree planting and preservation has been widely discussed and agreed upon, many have itcost ' |y to preserve trees and bconomioa||y desirable to remove them boforecon- struction. Savings from this policy are short-term, however, and developers often ignore the long-term and very much more real economic and social benefits. In order to reinforce the goal of tree preservation, development • types in wooded areas should have a low intensity level, with low parking demand and low building coverage. Most important, development in these types should preserve a large portion of trees, leaving them and the ground cover around them undisturbed. The map below shows tree coverage in the planning area. (--,.1.4,•:17*- gh.:p9---e8,_feeit y •.•,-, . qtY.ViA.EAP.' '" .ff 1?•1471t•a 404`...Aff ''',I,:4- m . v f ` | 4 �� * fg� - 200e (3; 0() 4030 � �� . - 1 -' SCALE IN FEET ""�" "�" ^�� ,+~_ —~~ ~~-- " \ ,70 ~�� ` ' � • 86 • ATTACHMENT 4 . 029 SOIL - GEOLOGY . - . The geologic formation of the earth is important in determining the appropriateness of development as well as its possible adverse effects on • the natural environment. Knowledge of geologic conditions may alleviate . special problems which developers may encounter, such as hard rock forma- tion and conditions which affect the feasibility and.spacing of septic tanks. Areas were categorized according to their soil conditions so that special standards could be applied to potential problems. Four classifi- cations were made: desirable (no problems), conditional, problematic,•and , undesirable. These, in turn, had been derived from a more detailed soil association system with the following categories: slope, flooding, bedrock, stability,erodability,permeability, pans and water table.5 In areas served by central sewer systems, soil associations are • not factors in determining the relative intensity level of development. Ex- cept in those areas designated as undesirable (which are included in Physio- graphic Type 4), the soil-geology association may be used as a guide for developers as to the type of problems which may be encountered in the course of development. it is also useful as a means.of determining where special standards should be applied to reduce erosion, floods and other problems. The following map illustrates soil associations in the case study area. • d4 . LIBERTY 1 is s• i?'' •+ .:.. RESERVOIR/.4. 2..i,;;,•:,1;:,: ..6:•, y, SOIL `, '` '.•` L ASSOCIATIONS. \\ �. .,,..A1::',:,. Suitability for Development • , t.4 y..;kip: i ..'.:,..:::.i,..„.. 4.+ RI CONDITIONAL . : .H "`t ... '� !A,_ .ice' PRomimAnc rJ_ ;l52r uE5RA8LE r ! t 4,,,, • .. ...: •.- - r r 1fl:: •., t ,:• i ._ " .... ' .r n .d" . t i i! ` f , .,-a. 4 : r l. ,F:M 2000 O .� .. ,L.� ?':!a. i:�:iri{:il:t;iir-:. r$;4 .¢ � gg1 t r•:;: a ^ g ii:..:. tn r BCa1E M FEET - aCf'}.,, " °i 4 . K .,.:r;"..o. _ -� ' .}�: ": kieRliiinSil s Y ,� .,: ,.�+. i ,. x13iz i� ,;li:}. w fj_y . , ,. +v;. scACE IN NILES • r+" 1-70N -4' &LAND UTILIZATION POTENTIALS OF THE BALTIMORE REGION BASED ON NATURAL CRITERIA: Baltimore: Regional Planning Council, December, 1970. 89 [ r, - ORANGE COUNTY -030 SOIL SUITABILITY GROUPINGS ATTACHMENT 4A , • SOIL GROUP .,_ LAND USE . la lc 2a 2c 3 4 5 8 9 10 f . 3eptic Tank Fair Fair' Fair Fair Fair Poor Poor :Poor Poor Poo, Absorption Fields : Sanitary Landfill Fair Fair Fair .Fair Fair Poor Poor Poor Poor Poo, • Trench • Sanitary Landfill . Good Good Good Good Fair Good Fair Poor Poor. Poo. Area . , • 1 !Daily Landfill Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Poor Poor Fair Poor Poo. Cover 1,Yellings Without Good Good Good Good Fair Poor Poor Fair Poor Poo, Basement r I • Dwellings With Good Good •Good Good Fair Poor Poor Poor Poor PO°, ' Basement ' kSmall Commercial Good Good Fair Fair Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poo ( Buildings V ' ' Local Roads Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Poor Poor Fair Poor Poo ' and Streets • ' Pond Reservoir Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Good Good Poor Fair Fat Area Embankments, Dikes Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Fair Fair Poor Poor Fai Excavated Pond Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Fai , Camp Areas Good Good Good Good Fair Fair Fair Fair Poor Poo Picnic Areas Good Good Good Good V Good Fair Fair Fair Poor Fai Pia :round Good Good Good Good Fair Poor Poor Fair Poor Fai Ballfields Fair Fair Fair Fair Poor Poor Poor Fair Poor Fai Paths and Trails Good Good Good GOod Good Good Good Fair Fair Fai ______ . • ATTACHMENT 5 ,, �- I 0 31 =z ,u. l • •y 1 SITE ACCESSIBILITY INDEX »° • ` , REOIR}},1\" 09, ^'�"-1 MR PTTERVLS • ,,,,‘",-,,..'/‘ . 1110..., r1r.wr FREEWY MA,K)R ARTERIAL t LLt a ARTEV. 444y� fi, Nl/ T14 EENtER -t ti -' r Accessibility to Interchange 1 Rio C( J (., 6 1 Vii► •/�''ricfw 41, IP ej . • i,..... \. \,. r 4I IS, r , t1 hh7t , 1/ .'u�to- I�ERTY`l.� J "- ::� i1,, • RESERVOIR > \ ° 1-fON �I 'l'' . Cr. t' 16 ) . G ' • Accessibility to Town Center 2 `i- / _~— '';a (.1( 4'9 5 kJ 4 v 41101 4i. P 4\ 1-a i;. A \\lb, ,,,,. _____Aii. ,.. .,::, . ,„,., ,.: .,, ,:,,, ,, ,,,, .. p� z000 o z000 4 i • X131(i SCALE IN FEET q/ I , . It u.s o ' a.s i r . 6 SC4:E MN MILES \ ;•5 I-7ON `tl' 1._//iit!':. WI ik . - 's �'. *7 I 92 �'� •ei • oaf t'.i • ATTACHMENT 6 • 032 r:e -- SITE ACCESSIBILITY INDEX ?., • RELATIVE ACCESSIBLfTY LEVELS � �T .FREEWAY 1 [" LBERTT 11n. • WAX ARTERIAL Ti f' RESERVdFT uaa anrEFea 'e NTERdiMY,,E vi. !�" ) IN TOWN CENTER •' I *aii.,N41%444.,14.„).. 4,,,,, . - z000 o z000a000 I •�, 1y SCALE M FEET \ rdiPr _'4, Od 0 OA J SCALE W NILES < T `It t ) Alt, %AIL : ,, L. rc PHYSIO-ACCESS DISTRICTSs ;.) i �x The result of the physiographic and accessibility analyses is a ,I composite map with districts, each representing a physiographic type by accessibility level, or, in other words, a physio-access type.The map,a corn- '4-;■ bination of the physiography and accessibility maps, follows. Using this map as a base, and in concert with other amenities, 4 t'.. the plan was u: p prepared by attributing development types to the physio- F access type districts... r�5, ti. �} • 93 l ' ' '.r '.' . '•' '''':!' • :•"1•P • r • : • . . ATTACHMENT 7 ' • . , 144:- • • • 03,3,., • . . • PHYS10—ACCESS DISTRICTS TYPES • eaCHA0R.A3CxTERISSTICS • 23: I ' • , `-.-A.;,..'; l'i 011 11 41 I ' Ea 3•4) rie TT R=IR i 1".c!.;',';';',,A1,111'11 ED e-15 cia zw 1,11;..1,'..1 . ..,.„ ' 1:33 >Is • Da zw-r ,,- ..• -. , . : •.....: • OA TREE COVERAGE MI 2C t.;.., r ...:171-•:- 41,.4 4. ,•-•.t•:,- ••,• -41-1.: fir.,: ,... c:i WOW CRIENTATION lial SOT . 'z., WY'•-' • •,, ■i' - 1 r Y,!;1111',■!,,, ..«. a'..I''',' .1. • +':.:i....i:'....;::•:-..... '• . ii! 1411!.4.-2,13".. •'I.. •,' .411=1, - ro COLD ORIENTATION tau 3W ,,,.1-:.:;',-;,,,--;:.-,,I..f:.;•-,1;,.... L,ip1Aorpog1.1;,,,.:„ %..:i.:),..„••43.‘..,..44u., '-'4,'11:i'll,:,:tir;.:.:'':i.-...-1 0114: ,RELATIVE 'ACCESSIBILITY LEVELS IIII 3Vir a:q ;,,i gr-If,'• .(34At...r-le, ' 0,0 DB 3C •:.:.;',.,''','..!:.'„,,,:: ' A."1, 1 ir ItgiT! r ".:.:,;;.: t. "A041.' - _ . gm 3cr • , . . .5. 5. '',',. • 1.;5•44.if .--:'••,5t., ,.,.114,55, --:.'x...:-...... .1:14'..1;p..,,,11!,i:. ,. :, h., .1 . • ....., pl.,.11,', .. 7a01f.;4l0;i, 5t,7.,v„...,,,-., ,.:•:,..,,:,,:;,-4. i.',k.1 f!fl!t.:r r;,..•g 1,.,1 i1'.i I.n..h;:4.,•,.4V,,,.:;:i=.;;;;:r:;P•t..,y ,.....,...4,,•..;,1,,,,,.,..1. ;;:,•. , Jill ED nwcr ',.:i..c.;.:ci`”"-!:!.1140,4.14-'114•,.,..Jkl'l II'"•"•ti 4 . •'; -•;•1.1:::::::".:,*4„,fi.•;:',,, ,{br'ilA-A........1',...-., :........,g4,.:.'•••..t.:$;••i, ITilf% 1.,,,,-0,. iftiOrP;I..:00 ii.'M:- :51ti ':••••:::.°5'.5.-.''' •1:1;1:44'''':':•Y::',II:If,:s ft 1:;,'-'.:•:::..1`ff':.:1441:'i:::14::.^:10,41.1:&,"4.*::711: I 5,•&:•1:.:: J•■•• t*.,:kf;f15:',.....41.,' It p 0'6%44'1.,phnit,.',...4'.4 - -'4,1*.'''..-..411'.II 41.1.1.-' '*:;.:::1;:-•-::!::::ij:i'A'-;:ilf■* 1'.1.1.4.0,2.41,:i!.-4,..'?"'0'41.'il.i!k I,:-,;A,C4 ,:. . v:tz.:frop;.'.: ,...-if-21.• --,,.....„.......„../r111.6, ,..,„..,,„..,4„,.. Ill 1.„Lan . • 2000 0 2Coo a '''''t?,;Yit, itly'.;it l'A •••;,..•-iY::::.1i 1.;:.1 r■ t:::::::";.P...':"::'!..,111'.',- ,011111-:-..':':f;f•'E.'1;:',X.:, 5 t10.! 41f,Ijill ' ,i.,:iiirA, z, . SCALE '15:ill tf i;F::':-.,..::••2•::::'-f.::-:::4:-.•:* 411 .. :,gtIe.*:...4.• '''' 1.,-!„,.,;. i 1 '011501p' .. ,t:1!).,'.i...Pq:.*.:4;liV.j::::,4,,..•::?..:c12,-"t!'1J..:45P-k 44;:•::-4:`:"'f,11°. ,5:,i'',:liStO. , 0.5 SCACE 04 10LE5 '),!:t?i liarig. *;tr, 4 ;;11!tAT4..r. Gf'.''f:'.'•e'l '2411(44••• ••:;V:"•'1'1,•.•%ii . „,/,;A:.. .., it.px.v.,. 4:4'4•.0+,....14_ . . ' • ITON L.-. . ;I . • ... • • • • .:•.1 . • • . . • • • . .......,.......„..,----------. • ,......--•._,..- -.,...--r-11...T..„,R•-• ..._,..,,.....- - 1111L---------„: ' .....- -,-- ......-- \ / 2CT \ • ....,..--• 1 I 2/./ ir—7— ,, ._._ ,__ ,__-_.-_,,--'. ---',,,,,,-.1,-,A, • 7 ji V --7L-i--.•• •t es —2 L‘"Z„. • t t r . ( i k ..., .,•-1; :::::, • -J-7-1 • ir ----- II ,,,, ...-- , 1:-,,....:.CC 20 --,,,,....„...- ■ fy/01 ..., RP . 1-1 • 94 • -1 t • . • . • I . . • • ATTACHMENT 8 - ,` 034 c APPLICATION TO PLANNING AREA • lei In general, high intensity type is allocated to districts with high t accessibility, warm slopes, and flat.or rolling land. A decrease in intensity level is recommended with a decrease in accessibility or with an increase in • • the degree of slope above 8 percent. A further decrease is suggested for cold slopes and areas with tree coverage. Although each development in- •• tensity type is intended to accommodate a mix of uses, the plan recommends that uses requiring large structures of low intensity be located on cold 4f slopes (such as warehouses, industrial buildings, and institutions). • For areas having a physiographic character.of 4—that is, slopes of 15 percent or more—a semi-rural type district was designated. This type • is a separate development category in which the intensity of development is `` less than in urban type I and to which special standards are applied. The application of the table to the total planning area,adjusted to reflect amenities, has resulted in the formulation of a development inten- ,, . ' • sity types plan. All areas are included within the regional twenty-year sewer ;{. plan and not part of the semi-rural categories are designated for development •• at intensity type I. s` 1 • S DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY PLAN .. ,i 0EVEIL .ENT MUSTY TYPE • CD SJA-RLP AL AREA • flESERVgR P II- •._ AREA • e•yc TYPE 1 $a1i'i �^it a 01(1,,1121.S' :::ii:: 9 TYPE i :`- TYPE N • 44115;0( � iP��+ ;,:rte:•. +__....:•.�. � �, ll,%/1 . I • TPE 0 T TE II .(, MI TYPE IiiiiI jP ; : `N�, X11; If1 ::.:..,.:,,,t,, [ ,,,..7_,_:-,_ „ 4„,:,..„:::::.::::::::,....:... „...„..7%,..,„1 0,t,..101 I II II---:*=---.7 iiii al -.:,....- ..::::;::::::::::..... 'kV • ( 0 0 20 III c! .,:.•• :, r, F} 3ri I II' 1 g —: .\ ' 111111111111111110. o i ' Ii r t ?I r' l:w r 'lv 4 20000 ' "0 ._:t 0r l(I lJQI Iirmo+—,':,I • •. • .:,:0 - s II 11/: „S=i'Ii I': A 1 11115""f4r.: . SCM.E M PEE1 ~ .t^ ''1 'os o a.s t SCALE w►a.ES • - 1-70 N' .-'l, • • 97 . TABLE 1 DESIGNATION OF DEVELOPMENT-INTENSITY TYPES TO PHYSIC-ACCESS DISTRICTS 5 ACCESSIBILITY LEVELS (15) (10) (5) (0) RATING 1 2 3 4 1WD VII VI v Iv DEGREE OF SLOPE 1WTD VI v Iv III (10) 1 = 0-77 1wM v2 v Iv III (5) 2 = 7-15 (0) 3 = 15%+ 1WTM V IV III II 1WU V IV III II 1WTU' IV III II I •. SLOPE ORIENTATION' 1CD V:I V IV III (5) W = warm (SW,SE,E,S) 1CTD V IV III II (0)' C = cold (N,NW,W,NE) 1CM V IV III II 1CTM IV III II I (0) T = TREES • ICU IV III II I (5) N = NO TREES 1CTU III II I R 2WD VI _ V IV III SOIL .ASSOCIATIONS 2WTD V IV III II (10) D = desirable 2WM V IV III II (5) M = marginal w 2WTM IV III II I (0) U = undesirable. H 2WU III II I R INTENSITY TYPE 0 2WTU III II I R 10 = RURAL 2 CD V IV III II 15 = I •0 2CTD IV III II I 20 = II 25 = III rila 2CM IV III II I .30 = IV pa., 2CTM III II I R 35 = v 40 = VI 2CU III II I R 45 ='VII 2CTU Ix I R DEVELOPED AREAS R 3WD V Iv III II 3WTD Iv III II Z 3WM IV III II I • 3WTM III II I R 3WU III II I R 3WTU II I R R 3CD IV III II I 3CTD III II I R 3CM III II I R 3CTM II I R R 3CU II I R R 3CTD • I R R R r...„, . „.„ . 036 • • . . • ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT RILLS130ROUGR r • v-, NORTia. CAROLINA 27278 ootv ..1.et I $6Ee r'el I'441* : S'7,1 ■I;' t 4-- 4 z...;#' ',.. ,,,„ r 0, '''..4 zaok` ; . MEMORANDUM TO: Marvin Collins, Director of Planning '1. FROM: Gene Bell, Planner III Ge RE: Consultant Contacts for Public Opinion Survey DATE: January 29, 1985 ) To date, I have contacted (or tried to contact) the following organ- . . izations concerning the Public Opinion Survey for the JPA Land Use Plan: (1) UNC School of Journalism (2) Focusgroup, Inc. (3) Southeastern Institute of Research, Inc, ( _ (4) UNC School of Business (5) N.C. League. of Municipalities ( (6) NCSU Center for Urban Affairs The results of these contacts are summarized below. (1) UNC School of Journalism: i talked with Jane Erown at the School of Journalism. She said they do not conduct public opinion surveys on a routine basis. They conduct the "Carolina Poll" twice a year and other surveys from time-to-time as class projects or in conjunction with graduate courses. She said if there was a class interested in taking on the survey he would get back with me. She did offer to assist in questionnaire design. Further, she recommended using a sample size of 400 - 500 (would result in • approximately t 4% points margin of error) regardless of who did the survey. In closing, she strongly recommended a consultant, Focusgroup. (2) Focusgroup, Inc., 100 Eastowne Dr., Chapel Hill, N.C., 929-7759: I spoke with Jim Protzman at Focusgroup and learned the following. They specialize in phone surveys and have a bank of 20 phones. They recommend that interviews not exceed 10-12 minutes nor that questionnaires be longer . • than 35 questions (people start hanging up when these thresholds are passed) . On their questionnaires about 10 questions are demographically oriented. . A sample size of 500 is more than adequate, resulting in about.± 312-4% points margin of error. If we desire to break out specific groups or geographic areas it might be advisable to go up to 600 on the sample size. He said they could meet our deadline of mid-March and that,turn-around time would be 5-6 weeks. This would include 1 week to develop the questionnaire (which we would have to approve) , 1 week to conduct interviews, and 2-3 weeks for analysis .,,...d • . . 037 Memo to Marvin Collins . . Page. 2 . i:. and report generation A short survey of 300 respondents and a questionnaire of 15-20 questions would cost-$3,800-to $4,000. A long survey of 30-35 questions and 600 respondents would be $8,500 to $9,000. Charges include •rk.- all meetings with us, developing the questionnaire, conducting the survey, analysis, reports, and a formal presentation of the results if we desire. Recent clients of Focusgroup include: • - Bob Jordan Primary. Campaign ,. - N.C. Memorial Hospital - Wachovia Bank - Piedmont Airlines - Jefferson Broadcasting N.C. Center for Public Policy Research ,. - CBS: Network as well as local stations - (3) Southeastern Institute of Research, Inc., 2325 W. Broad'St., Richmond , Va.,23220, (804) 358-8981: I spoke with Richard Steele who said they offer a "turnITkey" package on their surveys. Their minimum cost survey includes ; 20 questions to 300 respondents for $4,900. 5 to 8 of the questions are demographic in nature. The questionnaire is developed by working closely with us in terms of what we want the survey to determine. Once the questionnaire is finalized, 30 days are required to complete the survey. Their costs range from the $4,900 quoted above to $15,000 to $20,000 for 80 questions to 300 respondents. Additional questions are charged at the rate of $.80 per question per respondent. Travel expenses incurred by them are additional. They find a sample size of 300 to be statistically reliable to within 4, 5.6% points at -the 95% confidence level. If we are concerned with certain groups or geographic • areas in the survey population they like to interview an equal number ,from each group and then weight the responses to reflect the overall population. Recent clients of Southeastern include: - Harland Bartholomew (sub-contracted them for surveys for following cities) • Fayetteville . Danville, Va. ' . Roanoke, Va. • . Radford, Va. - Planters National Bank NCNB • (4) UNC School of Business: Art Jackson of the Chapel Hill Planning staff has been trying (unsuccessfully thus far) to contact a professor of marketing whose graduate students conduct surveys from time-to -time. (5) N.C. League of Municipalities: i spoke with Gene Dillman at the League. He told me they do surveys from time-to-time, but are not set up to do surveys on a routine basis. He suggested that'I contact Dr. Yevonne Brannon at the NCSU Center for Urban Affairs. He said he thought the Center could help with the analysis of survey results although it would probably be up to us to develop the questionnaire and conduct the survey. , - , ...1'," 038 V 15 '.I., r 4-- Memo to Marvin Collins. Page 3 Z (6) 'NCSU Center tor Urban.Affairs, 737-3211: I spoke with Dr. Yevonne Brannon at the Center for Urban Affairs. She said that they were -( very flexible and could do as much or as little of the survey as we desired. .., I said that because schedules were tight and staff time at a premium, we ..,Tt ',-,- • were interested in contracting out the entire project. She said that they could design the questionnaire (with our assistance) , define the S sample, conduct interviews, key punch data, produce a clean data base, V and do preliminary analysis for a cost of $12-$l5 per interview. This ,..z ;,- • would require us to do the report writing and presentation. She recom- mended a sample size of 800-1,000, especially if we were interested in -TA •- doing cross tabulations of various demographic groups. She said she -14 could meet our deadline if we began right away. , .( 4-11• 4••'t ■ My assessment of the consultants contacted is that Focusgroup best meets our needs. it is my recommendation that we pursue a contract S1th Focusgroup to produce the JPA Public Opinion Survey, Li ,--iz '., = 4, • $ • ' .0 r, ), 'i'.'• t • - . • ,r '".. 't-•• 1 ' ) • LI• , ''r, • i t • • • .'i .:. ,i,•itl'....)11, • ' ,-;■•1 • kt Ai l'4 ... . , ,.. 4 • • /.1 . ' • 3,)*•r,• , . BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS �' ACTION � 8CTIUQ �GEY�DA ITEM ABSTRACT � [�*~'' ITEMNO-L.�� ' MEETING DATE 0 � �F�8R` 'Y 4' 198;_ ' � • ' • SUBJECT: ADVERT|S �ENT OF PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AND SUB -DIVISION/V/S|O RE�ULAT|"' N3' . • YES X ' DEPARTMENT: PLANNING ` � � ' . . / ° � . � ATTACHMENT(S) : . LEGAL NOTICE INFORMATION CONTACT: SUsAN• SmITH - . � ' � ^ � ' . . . � � ' � . . ` � � . • . ' •PUKPUSE; To ieviuw the 1eDal 'a Vortisements for matters to'6 e presented to public ub l i c�!.` ' ^ . . .- hearing on February 25, 1985. . • � - - •� � .. . • ' ` ' ' • ' ' •' �� NEED: The Board of Commissioners has --p'^~seJ'a desire to review any proposal for text amendments to the Count y ordinances and the• leQa, notioas advertising the ' .same prior Cu advertisement. . � . ^` ' ' . ' ' .•ir . ` `Attached are the legal advertisements '°r t=xt amendments *o le p�msente6 to _` puhlic hearing on February 25, , � .. = .' • . '' ' • • . extractive uses are.pehn|tta6 |n industrial, residential and' .• �'General-Cummerclul |V districts, subject to issuance of a special use permit." '` ' ' '0n6of.i6e 'current regulations.; the applicdnt is not .required to demonstrate that 'thare )m a need for the operation. ` . ' • . . • • •`. . Rock quarries are necessary to provide crushed stone for local building � - '_activiUes, but all things considered, should be limited in location and ^ '. 'number to just provide for local needs, That is, Orange County should hav e - quarries sufficient to meet local building needs, but should not become a . ` `• rock exporter. . . ' �� - . `' • - 7 . '^ The �lannng staff is proposing several modifications fo th e extraot|ve.USe. , ' • 'Provisiohs that would tighten the present ordinance to minimize -land use tcmflicts created by future extractive uses. ' . • ' - '. In addition, the planning staff is also propos|pg several oth er minor o r6i»a»de ' text amen6ments :which include the following: - .. • ~ �amem�yn� the definition of '� 'su�div/slon" |n �h� �uh6�v|s�on �e�u�at|on ' . . to track the *ord|nlcontained in the enabling statutes. -' • *amending Section ].g Official ��n|n� Atlas--~`- Replacement to allow replacement of the Zoning Atlas without requiring authorization by resolution of the �. • ' Board of Commissioners. '. *amending Section 8.8 ReQuleti s Governing Individual 'Special Uses to . r�qu/ �a �� su�mi�tal of addi�ional copies of site plans needed ' ject review activities. � to pro- / , � � . . ` . . . • �� • 040 IMPACT: Review of the proposed advertisements would insure that the legal notice of fr the public hearing is in a form that can be understood by persons not familiar with the subject. ' RECOMMENDATION (5) : • Accept as to form. • That the Board approve a resolution stipulating that no special use permit applications for extractive uses be accepted until after June 1, 1985 in order that the proposed amendments can be acted upon. • � � � . ^»-�~� • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND ZONING ORDINANCE OF ORANGE COUNTY, N.C. Pursuant to the requirements of the General Statutes of ' North Car ol i na 'Chapter 153A, Section ]2] and Section 343, Article 20'5 and Arti 7 e 20- 6 of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance and Section V| | / of the 0 ange County nt y�ubd�vi�Ycm Ordinance, notice is hereby given that a public hearing will held in the Superior Courtroom of the Orange County Courthouse, 106 East Margaret Lane, Hillsborough, N.C. on Monday, February 25, 1985 at 7:JO P.M. for th e purpose of giving all interested citizens an opportunity speak for or against the 'adoption of proposed amendments to the Orange Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations. The amendments d s un e, consideration are as follows: 1 . Amend the Definitions of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations by revising the definition of "subdivision" to traCk the definition provided in W.S. 153A-335. • ThetJeflnition currently differs from that contained in the enabling 2. Amend Section 9.9 Official Zoning Atlas Re of the Orange ' County Zoning Ordinance to allow re' l damaged or lost por- � tions of the Zoning Atlas without requiring authorization 6y rosolu—� tion of the Board of Commissioners. - The Ordinance currently requires that all replacements be made only with specific authorization by resolution of the Board of Commissioners. . 3. Amend Section 8'8 ' by requiring that for Class A Special Use applications twenty-six (26) copies of the site plan and for Class B Special Use applications ten (10) copies of the site plan be submitted, ons The ordinance currently requires 7 copies of Class A and 20 copies of Class B site plans which do not meet the needs for project review. 4. Amend Section 4.3 Permitted Use Table to limit extractive uses as permitted uses requiring a Class A special Use Permit to the following zoning districts: Industrial-1, , Industrial-11 , Industrial-Ill Agricultural-Residential and Residential-1 . ` Extractive uses are currently permitted in all residential and individ- ual zoning districts and in the General Commercial-IV zoning district. 5. Amend Section 8.8.1 Extraction o f Earth Products (C 7 ass A Special Use)as follows: a. Amend Section 8.8.1 Additional Information by adding additional informational requirements for the plan, operations plan and rehabilitation plan. The additional information would allow for comprehensive analysis and evaluation of the proposal . ��* F.::: . � K�.�� -�- � ' • • b. Amend Section 8-8. 1 .2 Standards of Evaluation by ad" additional ing �� |tlon l standards addressing 7 area� the amount of ' under excavation; groundwater impact; buffers and setback ` operational |nsp�c s� ' operational reports; �yona� and abandonment or termination of operations. c. Standards of evaluation currentiv in the Ordinance do not address fi these matters. ' All interested citizens are |n»ited Changes may be made in the advertised t» attend this hearing and be heard.and discussions at the ha�r|ng proposals which reflect debate, objections Citizens unable to attend the hearing may express their views by writing to the Orange County Planning Department, 106 East Margaret Lane, Hillsborough, u h N.C. 27278. For your concerns to be fully considered, they must be received g " by the Planning Department prior to the public hearing. ' , . Questions regarding the proposals should be directed to the Orange _County Planning Department. Office hours are from 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. , N d through Friday. ~ ^ � Monday . � 1 . . �� r ' v � *� _ MARVIN COLLINS, PLANNING DIRECTOR ■ PUBLISH: February 13, 1985 . , � } '..i.',"1:, | ` . � � . . -� ,��4 ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 106 EAST MARGARET LANE HILLSBOROUGH, N. C. 27278 RICHARD E.WHITIED,aur BEN LLOYD SHIRLEY E.MARSHALL NORMAN WALKER DON WILLHOIT A RESOLUTION REGARDING REQUESTS FOR CLASS A SPECIAL USE PERMITS -:EXTRACTIVE USES WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Orange County will be considering amendments to the Orange County Zoning Ordinance which address the provisions of Article 4 Permitted Use Table AnZ Article 8 Special Use Permits which apply to the issuance of Class A special use permits for extractive uses; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners and the Planning Board will jointly-conduct a public hearing for the purpose of receiving public comment on these amendments on February 25, 1985; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board and Board of County Commissioners will subsequently consider the amendments and public comment received thereon for recommendation and approval; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Orange County Board of Commissioners will not accept special use permit applications for extractive uses until after June 1, 1985 in order that the proposed amendments can be acted upon. • / DON WILLHOIT, CHAIR DATE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS _„4,411t, / BEVERLY B THE, CLERK TO THE BOARD DATE- • -:= (SEAL) rn � ' � .� I. ~ ^ • � �� . � �� ti ORANGE «��»��l�2C�� . . � t. _ � ____SB.~^~°"G"� NORTH {l&RQ00�A. il ' ` 27278 . m0^ or � $ ett, Di � ' . " �� . �� . . ^�. �� ' . MEMO � ki � X� TO MARV| . COLLINS ' ^ . FROM: � GUSAN SMITH DATE: JANUARY 22, 1985 SUBJECT: EXTRACTIVE USE REGULATIONS . ' ji Within the last year two local firms invo)Ved .ln the extraction and processing 1 , - of min eral resources obtained land in Orange County by purchase or option for purposes. 'Although neither firm has pursued apprnval o f the i of a special use permit as required by the Orange County Zoning Ordinance,nce'issuance the interest indicated by these firms and concerns raised by adjacent t � owners prompted staff to review the regulatory provisions contained �nproper y current Zoning Ordinance. the The provisions of the Zoning Ordinance (adopted 1981) regarding extractive e us o s were culled from the first Orange County Zoning Ordinance and subsequently for inclusion in the 1981 ordinance. The provisions of the first or6inance were more comprehensive and stronger than provisions in other local ordinances because th e development of the ordinance was stimulated by interest in6icateJ in Chapel Hill Township by a strip mining operation. The 1921 ordi- 'i,:," nance nance �xpan6�d on the provisions of the earlier ordinance by tying requirements more closely to procedural requirements and performance atandaros. The provisions of the current Zonin Ordinance governing extractive uses are (1) extractive u ` , uses are governed by the Special Use Permit process; (2) extractive uses are permitted, following approval and issuance of a special use perm|t, in all residential and industrial zoning districts and the General Commercial IV district; . ' (3) applications for a special use permit must include a site plan ; operations plan and rehabilitation plan; plan, � . . 1::';� � '"�n� _ ~^ _ ~ . ^ -2- � January 22, 1985 MEMO TO MAKVUH COLLINS FROM SUSAN SMITH 045 ` CONCERNING EXTRACTIVE USE REGULATIONS ` (4) a PY }oaLlonsmust satisfy both general and specific standards ds o f evaluatipn, as well as all other• requirements of the Zoning Ordinance for the district in which located, incl d/ng dimensional al standar6s, signage, parking and loading and land oap/»g^ Where an overlay district applies, the standards of that district must also be satisfied, ' ^ Under the provisions of the Ordinance any informational material necessary to make a determination may be required. . s reasonably In reviewing informational materials on extractive use regulation, the following P. areas for possible amendment to the Zoning Ordinance are suggested: Ft (1) limit extractive uses as permitted uses u nd • all other Prmcass to yndust�yal �gr��u}�ur��R�s7d�n�orla special use permit districts and prohibit them in ll th /a and Residential-1 o and watershed districts; residential, commercial (2) include the folf.r.,vinQ site plan requirements: a. aerial photograph of -the site and all areas within 1000' of the perimeter of the property flown within two (2) months of the application for a special use permit b. land use, road system, natural features and topographical (10' contours) details for the area within 1000` of the l of the property� � per meter c. location and results of groundwater borings showing depth of groundwater d. wind pattern details and on-site wind breaks e. typical cross-section showing sand and gravel deposits and the water table ow n� axt�nt of overburden, extent o opoy �s of grav� f. soils details and statement addressing agricultural productivity:: and reclamation efforts ') ' g^ traffic impact analysis addressing the capacity of road s serving site; (3) include the following Operations Plan requirements: a. methods to prevent pollution ofsurfact and groundwater b. operational test wells and schedule of results analysis and response c, compliance with the provisions of the Sedimentation and £ � Control Ordinance '' Erosion d. methods to control and respond to spillage of extracted material . . overburden or byproducts and vehicular mud on off-site roads s^ e. depth of extractive operation; • / K�/0�� ^ ] ^ v�.�v� � � � - - January 22, 1B�5 MEMO TO MARV|NCOL|NS FROM SUSAN SMITH CONCERNING EXTRACTIVE USE REGULATIONS � (4) include the following .Reha6l/itetiun Plan requirements: a. typical cross-section showing planned rehabilitation; (5) include the following standards of evaluation: a. provisions limiting the extent of property un4er excavation a given phase and relationship to reclamation plan for previously excavated areas b. provisions limiting excavation penetration below existing ' groundlArator tables with the exception of provision of permanent water bodies according to the rehabilitation plan c. provisions prohibiting extractive activities which permanently lower the water table of surrounding inhabited properties; 01 iwuuoe other prov/i!ont as f~llow§: a. annual submittals of operational napnrts -y the applicant detailing amounts of materials extracted, extent 'r' " of extractive area, results of test wells, etc. '- b. annual inspections of the operation by the Zoning Officer � determine compliance with the provisions of the special to . e permit c. requirement providing for application of a new special use permit in cases of abondonment or termination of operations for a period of twelve consecutive months The above amendment proposals reflect a desire to tighten th e current' of the Zoning Ordinance by specifically requiring the applicant to submit materials addressing relationships with and impacts on adjacent properties m|t mat�rials impacts on and methods to minimize impacts on surface prope'� ey and facillt7e�� ur wYth the provisions of the special use permit during the and lifetime water; compliance opera- tion; and rehabilitation reclamation plans. n8 /��t�me nF the If you require any additional information or would like to �scusy this t further, let me know. v s ma ter � . . ^ • O 2 N E COUNTY 047 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Action Agenda AC.CION AAGENDA ITEi ABSTRACT Item ho. Up MEE.C:L1i'G DATE 2/4/85 • Subject: Study commission on merger of Orange County School systems • Depa t: Board of Commissioners I , Public Hearing: yes y no Attachment(s) : emotion Contact: Don Willhoit No Phone Number: 132-8181 PURPOSE: To establish a study commission to consider the impacts of merger of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro and the Orange County school systems, NEED: During recent sessions of the General Assembly, there • have been various discussions of the desirability of consolidating school districts . There have been pro- posals to require consolidations to provide a maximum of one system per county or to limit State funding to one administrative unit per county. • The 1984 Session of the General Assembly passed the Public School Reform Act which commits the legislature to clarify funding responsibilities and directed the State Board of Education to develop a Basic Education Program. The State Board has produced a proposed Basic Program which has been accepted by the Education Policy Council of the General Assembly and will be presented to the 1985 Session for adoption. A task force of the Education Policy Council drafting proposed legislation for the 1985 Session has included a provision that would prohibit counties from providing supplemental funds for instructional . programs until it can be demonstrated that all school building needs have been met. Each school system has indicated that it will need an additional elementary school within the next five years or sm. If the County had only one school system; the additional classrooms could likely be phased in over a longer time period and thus make it easier for the .County to fund the additional classrooms. ','•''::10',4P tsi,71-1, , r Fr , 048 I f- r i il ( P: Other factors apropos of merger study include: requests If. from residents of areas near the Chapel Hill-Carrborn g.... District for inclusion in that District; the 1,1 .' expectations of the new residents that the completion of 1-40 will bring; questions of access to equal educational i opportunities within the County; and, suggestions that the optimum size school unit is nearer to 10,000 pupils --, than 5,000. 4., v RECOMMENDATION: ,e. t.., Establish a School Merger Study Commission to prepare a report for the Board on the issues associated with merger of the Orange County school systems. The charge to the commission would be to identify t advantages, disadvantages, and barriers to merger . ;.. 'q.< Specific items that the study commission should r,"' R., consider include: - IA( 1 . potential savings due to reduction in i administrative staff. 1.,., 2. potential savings due to sharing of L. ' r programs and facilities . .40 3. impact on need and timing of construction of - F new school facilities . 4. teacher and staff pay impacts ' ,4,., •' S. impact on instructional programs "4 t WiV to -Kgs 4,,, ,, ,:ii, 5.11, 04 ,-.:A I -„.. MN1 ,,. t:1 f., ii ,..-1 ,. r., 45 .11 eil -51 A ORANGE COUNTY 049 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NO.E.11 MEETING DATE FEBRUARY 4, 1985 SUBJECT: BID AWARD--ORANGE INDUSTRIES BUILDING ' DEPARTMENT: PURCHASING & CENTRAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEARING: - YES x NO . . . . . • ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill Laws ext. 501 Rob Addelson ext. 498 YES PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH - 732-8181 HILLSBOROUGH - 732-9361 CHAPEL HILL - 967-9251 MEBANE - 227-2031 • • DURHAM - 688-7331 , - PURPOSE: For the Board to consider awarding contracts for work to be perfOrmed on the Orange Industries Building. NEED: ticl —Opened !on Wednesday, January 23, 1985. The bids received are , listed on the attached tally sheet. The Board needs to award four contracts; one each for general construction •work, plumbing, heating and air conditioning, and electrical. • • IMPACT: Total Project Budget $176,000 • Expenditures thru 1/31/85 132,833 Available for expenditure $ 43,166 The sum of the lowest bids received for general construction, plumbing, heating, air conditioning and electrical is $77,806. Additional funds required above the $3,166 available is $34,640. In addition, there is a need for an additional $4,000 for graveling the parking lot, landscaping, grading and signs for the building. This brings the total amount needed for project completion to $38,640. It has been tentatively agreed that the outstanding amount of $38,640 will be shared equally by Orange County and OPC-Mental Health ($19,320 each) . Action by the Board is scheduldd for • Tuesday, February 5, 1985. RECOMMENDATION(S): • 1) Appropriate $19,320 from the Undesignate.d County Capital' Fund toward the project. • ---Continued I: 050 -2- [ RECOMMENDATION (Continued) : 4 2) Award the bids conditioned on receiving the OPC Board approval of the I' 19,320 in it's funding share to complete the project budget and enter !'? into a contract with the low bidders for the following amounts: General Construction - $27,876.00 . t Par Construction ‘) , Electrical to Tommy Lawrence Electrical Co. - $19,350.00 1, Heating andAAir Conditioning-$16,168.00 to Doug Whitt Heating and Air Conditioning 4 ,r- 1 , r :,,' Plumbing to Sparrow and 4,' Sons Plumbing - $14,412.10 'IP4 ] 41 1 if. ; .-,: ',. 1,1 1 . a.- .t,„.. ' !Al i il 14 ri l'!;;2! .,, v I, la "wr Hz 051 BID TALLY SHEET General Construction Base Bid Par Construction Co. - Durham $27,876. 00 D.W. Ward Construction Co. - Durham $29,250. 00 Resolute Building Co. - Chapel Hill $31, 933 . 00 C & A Construction Co. Durham $35,226. 00 Durham Construction Cd. - Durham $35 ,892. 00 Terrnell Enterprises - Greensboro $42, 882.00 Construction Enterprises - Greensboro $46,475. 00 Electrical Base Bid Tommy Lawrence Electrical Co. - Roxboro $19, 350. 00 Watson Electrical Construction 7- Wilson $21, 950. 00 Hawks Construction Co. - Hillsborough $22, 000. 00 Adams & Tilley Electrical Co . - Durham $27 , 786. 00 Heating and Ait Conditioning Base Bid Alternate for Alternate for Gas Piping venting heater Doug Whitt Heating and Air $15438. 00 + $385. 00 + $345 . 00 Conditioning - Roxboro Knight Heating and Air Condi- $15,588.00 tioning - Hillsborough Comfort Engineers - Durham $22, 749. 00 + $1, 165. 00 + $925 .00 Plumbing Base Bid Alternate to Install gas water heater Sparrow & Son Plumbind - Carrboro $13, 933. 00 + $479 . 10 Brown Brothers Plumbing - Durham $14,097 . 00 + $325 . 00 Acme Plumbing & Heating - Durham $14, 099. 00 + $930. 00 ._ ' . 052 NORTH CAROLINA ORANGE COUNTY THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into this .�� day of the Board of , 19 ' pursuant to a resolution heretofore adopted by Commissioners, Orange County, North Carolina, by and between a corporation with its principal office and place of business in politic (hereinafter called"the Counted the County a Orange, $ body W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, the County of Orange duly advertised for bids for by law; and and bids were received and duly opened as required WHEREAS, after a careful consideration of the bid submitted by the Company, the Board of Commissioners of Orange County has heretofore adopted a resolution authorizing the acceptance of such bid, and the execution, in the name of the County of Orange of a contract with the said Company covering the installation of a NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and in further consideration of the mutual agreement contained herein, well as the financial consideration hereinafter referred to, the parties hereto have contracted and agreed as follows; the (1) In accordance with the County' s specifications and Company's proposal, copies of which specifications and are attached hereto and made a part hereof, Company will furs sh and install a and specifically referred to as proposal submitted by the Company or din lthe specifications Lions described in the hereto. attached {$ (2) The total contract price is ). Payment shall be made on th`e ba`�'si of 100%o monthly costs of labor and materials, including freight or hauling receipted bills. Each contractor shall submit a monthly invoice which itemizes the cost of labor, materials and North Carolina sales and use taxes paid on materials. Payment shall within ten (10) days after the contractor's invoice ehas been dcertif`e payable for payment by the engineer. The total of the monthly d required herein shall not exceed ninety y payments contract price. County shall retain at least ten percent (90Rt (10%) of the total contract price for payment to the contractor with ptheefinal payment. the The final payment shall be made to the contractor within thirty (30) y (30) • 053 '.fl•• , - .., ,.,.:. days after acceptance of the completed job by the engineer. Acceptance shall occur when all work has been finally completed and each and every provision of the specifications and accompanying drawings completed to the engineer's satisfaction. (3) The specifications, and its attachments, the proposal thereon by Company, the advertisement by County, and the Performance Bond and the Laborers and Materials Bond on the part of the Company, copies of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof shall constitute the contract between the parties as though fully written herein. i` (4) Equal Employment Opportunity: In connection with the ti performance of this contract, the Company agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, „ religion, color, sex or national origin. The Company agrees to take affirmative actions to insure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during their employment without regard to , their race, religion, color, sex or national origin. (5) Termination for Convenience of the County. The County, by days written notice, deliverable in person or by certified ? or registered mail to the Company, may terminate this contract, in whole or in part, when it is in the best interest of the County. To the extent this contract is for equipment and is so terminated, the Company shall be compensated in accordance with Part 1-8 of the Federal Procurement Regulations (41 CFR 1-8), in effect on the date of this contract. To the extent that this contract is for services and labor and is so terminated, the County shall be liable only for payment in accordance with the payment provisions of this contract for services and labor rendered prior to the effective date of termination. (6) Termination for Default. (a) The County may, subject to the provisions of paragraph (e) below, by days written notice, deliverable in person or by certified or registered mail to the Company, of default to the Company, terminate the whole or any part of this contract in any one of the following circumstances: (i) If the Company fails to make delivery of the equipment or to perform the services within the time specified herein or any extension thereof; or (ii) If the Company fails to perform any of the other provisions of this contract, or so fails to make progress as to endanger performance of this contract in accordance with its terms, and in either of these two circumstances does not cure such failure within a period of ten days (or such longer period as the County may authorize in writing) after receipt of notice from the County specifying such failure. -2- --' .., - • 054 f : ...., (b) In the event the County terminates this contract in whole T or in part as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, the County ,'.• may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as the County may deem appropriate, equipment and/or services similar to those so ;'•. terminated, and the Company shall be liable to the County for any excess costs for such similar equipment and/or services: Provided, that the Company shall continue the performance of this contract to .., '' the extent not terminated under the provisions of this section. , ; (a) Except with respect to defaults of subcontractors, the Company shall not be liable for any excess costs if the failure to perform the contract arises out of causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Company. Causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Company are defined as those causes constituting "excusable delay" in section (7) of this contract. If the failure to perform is caused by the default of a subcontractor, and if such default arises out of causes beyond , the control of both the Company and the subcontractor, and without t ' the fault or negligence of either of them, the Company shall not be c k liable for any excess costs for failure to perform, unless the equipment and/or services to be furnished by the subcontrator were ; obtainable from other sources in sufficient time to permit the Company to meet the required delivery schedule. (d) If this contract is terminated as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, the County, in addition to any other rights t provided in this section, may require the Company to transfer title 1 and deliver to the County, in the manner and to the extent directed ' by the County, any material and equipment as the Canpany has specifically produced or specifically acquired for the performance of such part of this contract as has been terminated; and the Company shall, upon direction of the County, protect and preserve property in possession of the Company in which the County has an interest. Payment for material and equipment installed by the Company and , accepted by the County shall be at the contract price. Payment for material and equipment delivered to and accepted by the County and , for the protection and preservation of property shall be in an amount agreed upon by the Company and the County. The County may withhold from amounts otherwise due the Company for such installed material and equipment such sum as the County determines to be necessary to protect the County against loss because of outstanding liens or claims of former lien holders. (e) If, after notice of termination of this contract under the provisions of this section, it is determined for any reason that the Company was not in default under the provisions of this section, or that the default was excusable under the provisions of this section, the rights and obligations of the parties shall be the same as if the notice of terminadon had been issued pursuant to section (5) of this contract. -3- 6... 055 (1) The rights and remedies of the County provided in this section (6) shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this contract. (g) As used in paragraph (c) of this section (6), the term "subcontractor" includes both the singular and plural and means subcontractor(s) at any tier. (7) Excusable Delays. Except with respect to defaults of subcontractors, the Company shall not be in default by reason of any failure in performance of this contract in accordance with its terms (including any failure by the Company to make progress in the prosecution of the work hereunder which endangers such performance) if such failure arises out of causes beyond the control and without ,the fault or negligence of the Company. Such causes may include, but are not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy; acts of the United States or the State of North Carolina; acts of the County in either its sovereign or contractual capacity; fires; floods; epidemics; quarantine restrictions; strikes; freight embargoes; and unusually severe weather, but in every case the failure to perform must be beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Company. If the failure to perform is caused by the failure of a subcontractor to perform or make progress, and if such failure arises out of causes beyond the control of both the Company and the subcontractor, and without the fault or negligence of either of them, the Company shall not be deemed to be in default unless (a) the equipment, material and/or services to be furnished by the subcontractor were obtainable from other sources, ( b) the County shall have ordered the Company in writing to procure such equipment, material and/or services from such other sources, and (c) the Company shall have failed to comply reasonably with such order. Upon request of the Company, the County shall ascertain the facts and extent of the failure in performance of this contract and, if it shall determine that the failure to perform was occasioned by any one or more causes beyond the control of the contractor or the subcontractor when the subcontractor's failure cannot be remedied as herein provided, the performance schedule shall be revised, accordingly, subject to the rights of the County under section (5) of this contract. The term "subcontractor," as used in this section (7), includes both the singular and the plural and means subcontractor(s) at any tier. In all cases where delays are not excusable as herein defined and in addition to all other remedies provided by law and in this contract the Company shall be liable to the County for liquidated damages as particularly described in the bid documents which are a part of this contract. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the County have caused this contract to be legally executed, in duplicate each of which shall constitute an original, all as of the day and year first about -4- FY i ' • - 0 5 6 1,- written, the corporate seal of each having been affixed hereto by its proper officers, all as provided by law. ,... CORPORATION , 7 ATTEST: NAME OF COMPAI■IY BY (SEAL) , 1 INDIVIDUAL ATTICI': BY (SEAL) PARE! HIP :4*'' ,7 ATr&T: BY - (SEAL) PARTNER t,1 ATTEST: BY (SEAL) "A t TRADING AS ‘I 1,1 ORANGE COUN'TY TY, BY CHAIRMAN OF BCARD/COUNTY MANAGER ;7 ritt, This instrument has been preaudited in the manner required by the Local li- Government & F isc al Control ac t: FINANCE DIRECTOR I , .1 1 .`i -5- V,A '14 A . . . _ • • • ORANGE COUNTY 0 057 BOARD OF COM ACTION AGENDA MISSIONERS • ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NO. Eg MEETING DATE FEBRUARY 4, 1985 • SUBJECT: RESOLUTION CREATING AN ORANGE COUNTY ARTS COMMISSION • DEPARTMENT: COUNTY MANAGER I [IPUBLIC HEARING: • YES x NO • • ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: MANAGER'S OFFICE ext. 501 • • PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH - 732-8181 RESOLUTION HILLSBOROUGH - 732-9361 CHAPEL HILL - 967-9251 MEBANE - 227-2031 • DURHAM - 688-7331 • PURPOSE: To consider approving a Resolution creating an Orange County Arts Commission. • NEED: To Create an organizational mechanism to recommend distribution of State Grass Roots Program Funds in support of arts programs, serve as a clearinghouse for information on the arts and coordinate cultural and arts programs. • • • IMPACT: • RE COMMENDATI ON(S) Approval from the Board. • • 058 A RESOLUTION CREATING AN ORANGE COUNTY ARTS COMMISSION WHEREAS, the Orange County desires to encourage the artistic expression and involvement of its citizens and enhance the cultural, educational, recreational and economic contributions provided by the arts as a means or benefiting the public welfare; and, WHEREAS, the State of North Carolina provides financial support to local arts programs by allocating funds to counties on a per capita basis; and, WHEREAS, while the State has decided on past funding awards the increasing number and variety of arts organizations within Orange County makes local decision necessary in order to ensure the most effective utilization of the funds; and, WHEREAS, the County requires a local organizational mechanism for partnership with regional and State arts councils and to improve coordination of the efforts of individuals, organizations and institutions and secure greater public awareness of their purposes and services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE COUNTY THAT: Section 1. COMMISSION CREATED There is hereby established, an Orange County Arts Commission as the Official countywide advisory body on the arts, which will promote, coordinate and strengthen private and public programs to further the cultural development of the County. Section 2. MEMBERSHIP The Commission created herein shall consist of eleven members to be appointed by the Board of Commissioners. Members shall reside in the County. No organization which is a potential recipient of County arts funding shall • '..- have on the Commission more than one person who serves on its board or staff. Each member shall serve for a term of two years or until his or her successor is appointed and qualified, except that five of the original appointees to the Orange County Arts Commission shall serve for a term of one year following the establishment of the Commission. No member who has served two consecutive two-year terms may be reappointed ' until he or she has not served for one year. A vacancy in mid-term shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment to fill the unexpired term. All members of the Commission shall serve without salary. Section 3. ORGANIZATION A. The Commission shall organize and adopt administrative rules, procedures, and by-laws necessary to accomplish its purposes, and elect from its members a chairperson and such other officers as it shall deem necessary. B. Al]. regular or special meetings of the Commission shall be open to . the public as governed by North Carolina General Statute. Any person shall be entitled and encouraged to appear and be heard on any matter pertaining to the arts before the Commission. • 059 • C. The Commission's office and files shall be lodged organizationally within the Orange County Parks and Recreation Department. Staff support shall be provided by the Director of Parks and Recreation except as may be otherwise arranged by the County Manager from other departments and from the Triangle J Cultural Resources Committee and the North Carolina Arts Council. Section 4. PURPOSES The purposes of the Commission shall be as follows: A. To advise the Board of County Commissioners on matters involving the arts; B. Upon nomination of the Board of Commissioners and approval of the N. C. Arts Council the Commission shall be the Local Distributing Agent (LDA) to advise the Board of Commissioners of the annual allotment of Grass Roots Arts Program funds. As the LDA it shall have the goal of assuring that the County's annual grassroots funding allotment is broadly and fairly distributed to serve as effectively as possible the arts needs of the citizens; C. To encourage and aid the appreciation and awareness of, and participation in, the arts among all citizens of Orange County; D. To encourage cooperation and coordination among individuals, organizations and institutions concerned with the arts in the County of Orange; E. To facilitate the development of self-sustaining arts programs, F. To accept gifts or donations pertaining to cultural or artistic matters that may be. used to promote, aid and expand the cultural resources of the County. Section 5. ACTIVITIES The activities of the Commission shall include the following: A. To initiate, sponsor, conduct or support, alone or in cooperation with other public or private agencies, programs in the arts; B. To serve as a clearinghouse for information about Orange County artists, arts programs, facilities, organizations and institutions and to encourage public awareness, utilization and support of such resources; C. To administer the Grassroots Program funds which shall include the responsibility to: a) familiarize those interested in the arts with the guidelines necessary for funding, b) advertise for applications at the start of each grant cycle; c) review requests, d) recommend award decisions to the Board of Commissioners based on applicant's meeting guideline conditions and being able to arrange matching funds, e) mail award letters and checks, and f) secure proper documentation of expenditures for inclusion in the County's annual audit. APPROVED THIS', the 4th Day of February, 1985 Don Wilihoit, Chair Orange County Board of Commissioners • ORANGE COUNTY 060 •-1- BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT ITEM NO. Eci MEETING DATE'FEBRUARY 4 f 1985 SUBJECT: CHANGE ORDER--JAIL RENOVATION PROJECT DEPARTMENT: PURCHASING & CENTRAL SERVICES' PUBLIC HEARING: -YES •x NO • , . . . . . : . . ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: Rob Addelson ext. .498 Yes :' _a -. 13 . PHONE NUMBERS: HILLSBOROUGH - 732-8181 • HILLSBOROUGH - 732-9361 ', . CHAPEL HILL - 967-9251 • MEBANE - 227-2031 • . . • DURHAM - 688-7331 . . • PURPOSE: To consider ratifying a change order approval that had to be given on the contract with the D. W. Ward Construction Company for renovations to the Orange County Jail. ' . NEED: , In Or''der to complete the renovation, without work stoppage three changes were authorized in late January by the ASsistant Manager: 1) A door lock was respecified from electrical to manual because of the former being unavailable for installation in a timely manner. ' t 2) A second vision panel was omitted since the existing panel in the control room door was found to be sufficient to meet State requirements. • 3) A wire glass passage had to be installed between the MagiStrate"s . ... . . Office and Booking Room to facilitate the prisoners processing. IMPACT: •The net result of these change orders is to reduce the contract price by $613.00 (from $19,533.88 to $18,920.88). •. , . RECOMMENDATION(S): Ratify the change order approval as communicated in the attached January 23, 1985 letter of the Pur&hasing Director , to D. W. Ward Construction Company. • o; GE cook DEPARTMENT OF PURCHASING AND CENTRAL SERVICES an, waIr TATOVSTarr ItILLS8OROUGH, NORTH C4ROL/NA 27279 732-8181 967-9251 688-7381 227-2031 January 23, 1985 Mr. D. W. Ward, President D. ti. :card Construction Company P. 0. Box 15157 Dur'haYm, North Carolina 27704 Dear Mr. Wards I am writing in regard to Orange County's current contract with your company. for renovations to the Orange County jail. After a discussion with Mr. Johnson. your superintendent on the job. Mr. Bill Laws, Assistant County Manager, has brought to my attention the need to modifyfy two elements of the existing project specifications and add a new element. The first modification arises from the problem created by the long turn-around time for the delivery of the Folger-- Adam electronic door lock to be installed on the relocated security door. It is our understanding that delivery of the lock from the manufacturer will take from three to six months. In light of this, we would like to amend the specifications as follows: 1. Omit the puree of the Folger-P,dam electronic lock for the relocated security door. 2. Remove the electronic lock from the existing door between the Eby and Booking Room and install it on the relocated security door. This would preclude the need to wire a new remote control switch to the panel as currently specified but would require extending the wiring from the existing door in the 3coking Room to the relocated security door. 3. 'Upon removal of the electronic lock from the door between the Lcbby and the Booking Room, weld plates on both sides of the sliding door to cover the • 062 Mr. D. W. Ward, President January 23, 1985 Page 2 holes left from the removal of the electronic lock and install a manual lock keyed on both sides of the door. The second modification results from the fact that the installation of a 12" x 12" bulletproof wire glass vision panel in the control room door, as currently specified, is unnecessary as the existing vision panel already meets State code. As a result we would like to omit the specification calling for the installation of the vision panel. The element to be added would entail the removal of a 8"x16" block in the wall between the Magistrate's Office and the Booking Room and installing in its place a pass-through with 1 1/2" bullet proof wire glass. The impact of these changes would be to reduce the current contract price of $19,534.00 by $613.12 to $18,920.88 This reduction was arrived at by Mr. Laws and Mr. Johnson as follows: 8driitian th ontragt $151.88 -glass for pass-through between Booking Room and Magistrate's office $ 25.00-metal frame - Q-M6rvanual lock and keys for Booking Room door $445.88 Sub-total 20,06 N.C. tax $465.94 Sub-total 175.00 Labor (install pass-through-$75.00, manual lock-$75.00, cut hole through block-$25.00) $640.94 Sub-total 64.09 10% change order charge $705.03 Total 063 Mr. D. W. Ward, President January 23, 1985 Page 3. $1,010.00--electronic lock $ 45.45--N.C. tax $ 200.00--wiring of electronic lock to panel $ 62.70-12"x12" vision panel $1,318.15 Total Net uct i on from Con-i amt $1,318.15 -- 705.03 $ . 613.12 If the above is satisfactory to you, please acknowledge by signing below and returning this letter to me. if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, ,eleea-77 Robert N. Addelson D. W. Ward Construction Co. Date RNA/srs cc: Bill Laws, Assistant County Manager Lindy Pendergrass, Sheriff Ray Barden, Public Works Director ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AGENDA REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 1985 COMMISSIONERS ROOM HILLSBOROUGH, N.C. 7:30 P.M. A. BOARD COMMENTS B. AUDIENCE COMMENTS • • 1. Matters on the Printed Agenda 2. Matters not on the Printed Agenda C. MINUTES D. APPOINTMENTS PAGE # E. ITEMS FOR DECISION 003 1. Efland Sewer 004 2. Engineering Agreement--Efland Sewer 014 3. Legal Services Study 021 4. Thoroughfare Plan for Joint Planning Area 039 5. Advertisement of Proposed Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations 047 6. Study Commission--School District Merger Considerations 049 7. Orange Industry Contracts and Budget 057 8. Orange County Arts Commission Resolution 060 9. Jail Change Order 064 10. Bid Award Greenbox Acquisition 065 11. Lease Amendment--Old Police Building 069 12. Proposed White Cross Fire District 071 13. Budget Consideration 1985-86 -- Manager Finance Forecast Board Policy/Calendar/Forms 074 14. Mileage Reimbursement Rate 075 15. Unpaid Real Property Taxes and Tax Lien Advertisement 076 16. Title III B Grant Renewal 078 17. NACO Achievement Award Submissions • 102 18. Meeting Schedule Change • • • - - - ORANGE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 106 East Margaret Lane HILLSBOROUGH, N.C. 27278 PROCLAMATION We, the Mayors of Chapel Hill and Carrboro and the Orange County Board of Commissioners, do hereby proclaim the week of February 17 - 21, 1986 to be SCHOOL BUS SAFETY WEEK We all wish to stress the importance of providing training for both riders and drivers and to impress upon them the need for being courteous and helpful to each other while riding or operating our school buses; and, We wish to call attention to the importance of cooperation by parents, teachers and students, and to urge all those concerned to work together diligently to ensure that necessary safety precautions are taken throughout the school year. This the 17th day of February , 1986. C nty of Orange L01.4140/ Don Willhoit, Chairman Town of Carrboro Town of Chapel Hill James Porto, Mayor Jim Wallace, Mayor - -, f.,., dfl ORANGE COUNTY INTEROFFICE MEMORAM14 If, .rt* ha, '1O: Assistant Manager A irl 11, FROM: County Manager t- , SUBJECT: Bob Kanoy vs. Orange County Health Department Pf 1, r' EATE: July 23, 1985 ..:, tl, pi Et ) Please find attached information received from Bill ...‘, ,- Faison, Attorney representing Bob Kanoy, concerning septic tank inspection by the Health Department. Note the facts and determine the following: +3, 1. Is this a true account? 2. Does the statute of limitations prohibit a claim against the County since the incident of faulty inspection took place in 1979? .„, f ., 3. Have we had a malpractice claim of this type .-.,,, before? 4. What is the County Attorney and Health Director's advice as to whether to permit a claim to be filed :4,d against our insurance policy? .,., I f,'-'1.i Kenneth R. Thompson tel. KIWsrs ‘1,4 .irtil 41,il tIlli 1 ' 1 1 r's ,,, v 04 A 6 Attorney Bill Faison's call to Manager July 23, 1985 Bob Kanoy's experience which is made as a basis for an insurance claim against the County. Events by Date: 1. Perk tests done in 1979. 2. Property approved for construction by John Gray. 3. A house was built. 4. Kanoy moved in 1980. 5. Final inspection by Vernon Burns -- July 9, 1980--certification of completion stated "Soil poor, system not expected to function properly." 6. The certificate was not shown to the Kanoy's (why not? not required?). 7. January 1985 Kanoys received an offer to purchase their bone with closing to be February 1985. -- Lender required a septic inspection. -- Inspection was done by Konsler who said "septic could not be made to function correctly." 8. February 19, 1985 -- Meeting between Mr. Rangy and Tbny Laws. Laws said, (1) the land should never have been approved and permitted, (2) this was not the only mistake Mr. Gray had made in approving soil which could absorb septic waste. 9. February 26, 1985 -- Laws told Mrs. Kanoy, "Land should not have been approved." 10. February 28, 1985 -- Meeting of Steve Steinbeck of the State, Mr. Laws and several of the Kanoys' neighbors in which Mr. Stinebeck said, "the property should not have been approved nor house constructed on the property." -- Mr. Steinbeck worked with the Kanoys' in referring them to a Mr. Carleigh for the installation of a mound system designed by the State. -- The newly installed system was accepted by the County June 4, 1985. -- The original purchaser had since backed out of the proposed purchase in the Spring of 1985 because of the septic system problems. -- The Kanoy's obtained a second sales contract June 5, 1985, a day after the mound septic system was approved. , 11. Alledged damages -- The Kanoys incurred a cost $6,678 to install the mound system. In addition they incurred a number of additional bills due to delay in closing (additional house payments $2,5001; electric bills $39; phone calls to Mr. Carleigh $8.43; $36 interest on loan to finance mound; trips to the house $116; lawyers fees • TOtal: $9,517 plus lawyer's fees $ taignamsweammor -- The second purchase contract was for $1,100 more than the first so their net loss was $8,417.00. 12. Issues 1. Whether a statute of limitations exists from the time of the first inspection? Lawyer's answer: a claim or suit can be filed within 10 years. 2. Whether the County has insurance to cover acts of its employees? (Faison represents Reliance Insurance Company as well. Wants per- mission to take this up with the County's insurance carrier.) Determine how to respond to second question.