HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 08-08-1994 - VIII-C r
1
O R A N G E C O U N T Y
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: August 8, 1994
Action Agenda
Item
SUBJECT: MT. WILLING'S SUMMIT - PRELIMINARY PLAN
ACTION BY: September 22, 1994
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes _x—No
ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: Eddie Kirk
Extension 2582
Resolution of Approval
Application TELEPHONE NUMBERS:
Vicinity Map Hillsborough - 732-8181
Fiscal Impact Analysis Durham - 688-7331
Preliminary Plan Mebane - 227-2031
6/20/94 Draft Planning Board Chapel Hill - 967-9251
Minutes
PURPOSE: Consideration of a Preliminary Plan for Mt. Willing's
Summit Subdivision.
BACKGROUND: The property is located on the northwest side of Mt.
Willing Road (SR 1120) just west of Chestnut Ridge Church
Road (SR 1125) in Cheeks Township. The property is zoned
Agricultural Residential (AR) and U-ENO-PW. A portion of
the property is in the Upper Eno Protected Watershed
district and a portion of it is in the Critical Area (U-
ENO-CA) .
The tract is 34 .59 acres with 15 lots proposed. The
average lot size is 2 . 16 acres. Ledge Court, a proposed
public road off Mt. Willing Road will serve the
subdivision. Mt. Willing Road is a paved secondary road
and is designated as a collector road in the Land Use
Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
This Concept Plan was approved by the Orange County
Planning Board on December 20, 1993 with the condition
that Lot 16 receive access from the subdivision road.
The Planning Board considered the Preliminary Plan for Mt.
Willing's Summit on June 20, 1994 and unanimously
recommended approval subject to the conditions contained
in the Resolution of Approval.
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends approval of the Preliminary
Plan for Mt. Willing's Summit subject to the conditions
contained in the Resolution of Approval.
9
RESOLUTION 2
OF THE
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Date August 8. 1994
Name of Subdivision Mt. Willing's Summit
Owner/Applicant Johnny Mace
The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves Mt. Willing's Summit subdivision
preliminary plat, dated April 15, 1994 and containing 15 lots in Orange County, subject to
the fulfillment of requirements specified herein.
Ledge Court shall be irrevocably dedicated to the general public and be constructed to
standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. The approval of this
resolution authorizes and directs the Orange County Manager to accept for Orange County
and on behalf of the public generally, the offer of dedication of Ledge Court. This
acceptance by Orange County of the dedication to the general public of Ledge Court shall be
without maintenance responsibility. This road shall be maintained by the owner/applicant
until such time as it is accepted for maintenance by the North Carolina Department of
Transportation or some other governmental body. Before the Final Plat of Mt. Willing's
Summit can be recorded:
A. Sewage Disposal
1. Each residential lot shall contain an adequate area for septic disposal, and
repair area, approved by the Orange County Division of Environmental
Health.
2. The septic system location may restrict the size and location of improvements.
This disclosure shall be included in a document describing development
restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. The document
shall also disclose that information regarding the tentative location of septic
systems is available from the Orange County Health Department, Division of
Environmental Health.
B. Roads and Access
1. Ledge Court shall be constructed to standards of the North Carolina
Department of Transportation, within a 50 foot right-of-way, and the
construction shall be inspected and approved by NCDOT.
OR
1
t
A letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond shall be submitted to secure 3
construction of Ledge Court to the standards of the North Carolina Department
of Transportation. An estimate of the construction cost must be prepared by a
certified/licensed engineer or grading contractor and submitted to the Planning
and Inspections Department. The financial guarantee must reflect 110% of
that estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do
business in North Carolina.
The document describing development restrictions to be recorded with the
Ffia1 Plat shall state that the financial guarantee will not be released until the
road construction has been inspected and approved by NCDOT.
2. Submit an erosion control plan for construction of the road.
3. Lot 16 shall access onto the new subdivision road. This restriction shall be
stated in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to
be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
4. Ledge Court shall be renamed to prevent duplication of road names.
C. Land Use Buffers and Landscaping
1. Landscaping shall be installed or preserved as indicated on the approved
landscape plan, and must be inspected and approved by the Planning and
Inspections Department.
OR
Guaranteed financially through a letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond
submitted to secure required landscape installation and preservation. An
estmate of the cost for required preservation, plantings and their installation
must be provided. The financial guarantee shall reflect 110 percent of the
estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do
business in North Carolina.
2. Provisions for protection of existing trees as shown on the approved landscape
plan shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and
requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with
the Final Plat.
3. A Type A Land Use Buffer shall be provided along the right-of-way for Mt.
Willing Road (SR 1120). The buffer shall be 30 feet in width and provide
sufficient vegetation to meet the standards of Section IV-B-8-e of the
Subdivision Regulations. Said buffer shall be so noted on the plat, and
described in a document describing development restrictions and requirement
to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final
Plat.
2
1
d
D. Parkland
1. Cash in the amount of$944.00 [($2,203/acre x 15/35 acre)] shall be paid to
Orange County as payment in lieu of parkland dedication.
E. Drainage
1. Impervious surface data, as pursuant to Article 6.23.3 of the Zoning
Ordinance shall be included in a document describing development restrictions
and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently
with the Final Plat.
F. Miscellaneous
1. The Final Plat shall contain a title block and vicinity map in accordance with
Section V-D-2 and V-D-3 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations.
G. Certifications
1. A Certificate of Survey and Accuracy signed by a registered Land Surveyor
shall be notarized on the face of the Final Plat.
2. A Certificate of Declaration and Maintenance in the form provided in Section
V-D-6-b of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations signed by the
landowner and developer shall be on the face of the plat and included in a
document describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with
the Final Plat.
3. The Department of Environmental Health shall certify that all residential lots
contain sufficient area for septic tank disposal and repair.
4. The North Carolina Department of Transportation shall certify that Ledge
Court has been constructed to State standards or that construction plans have
been approved.
5. A Certificate of Approval signed by the Orange County Planning and
Inspections Department.
Signature of Applicant Clerk to the Board
accept the above listed conditions of subdivision approval,
and acknowledge that each must be met prior to recordation of the Final Plat.
3
APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAN APPROVAL 5
MAJOR SUBDIVISION 2/90
ORRNGE COUNTY
DATE: .4s42,k
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT (INK ONLY)
SUBDIVISION NAME: _.Er Y41LL))aU St]MM►T
LOCATION: 197 WILLD114, -ZD4* ,
OWNER/DEVELOPER: c - -04XL� � —
ADDRESS: .7�0 7yjz�& 2A--j, TELEPHONE NO.:
AGW/CONTACT: t,.pw�Q �QINd`G4lI )Vic— TELEPHONE NO.: ?3L^(oLIOL
A. SUMMARY INFORMATION:
Orange County Tax Map 112 Block Lot(s) Township �iAl:>Z 1C.S
Zoning District(s): Alt ! -Edo-?w U-E'Ald-CA
Total Number of Acres: 3A-(.0L Phases: l
Total Number of Lots: Average Lot Size: 2•Kp/fie.. Minimum Lot Size: 2_00A-
Number/Type of Structures: (existing) (proposed) ,S)AJ&L1_6 r,&^)L-)
Lineal Feet in Streets: 14�3S Acres in Open Space:
Water Supply: _ Public (specify) Community oX Individual
Wastewater Disposal: Public (specify) Community �� Individual
SchooL District: _ Fire District:
GeneraL Land Uses in Area: M2AC_i3_T%-)IZA(. ! "RaP.S)at�•)T1L�L.
Critical Areas: _ stream/drainageways flood prone areas
watershed (specify) historic sites
other (explain)
Is the property to be subdivided currently under "farm use value taxation"? Yes_ No_. If "yes", please
contact the Orange County Tax Office. Subdivision of the property may require payment of deferred taxes under
"farm use value taxation".
B. ALL plats must be submitted on sheet no smaller than one inch equals two-hundred feet (1"=200') and no Larger
than one inch equals twenty feet (1"=20') and must contain the following information:
subdivision name zoning of tract and adjacent properties
•✓ ;;r!`< name & address of owner(s) _✓ building setback Lines by notation or typical Lot
name & address of subdivider c:':fi: layout
N (if other than owner) location and width of existing and proposed
name of surveyor, engineer, `• '"` easements (drainage, utilities, roads, etc.)
-W� landscape architect or architect, � y; * existing, proposed and adjoining rights-of-way
address, registration # and seal including dimensions and street names and state
(title) Preliminary Plan ? road numbers. Lineal feet of road centerlines and
ti ✓ scale, north arrrow approximate acreage of new street rights-of-way
_/ date (including revision dates) existing and proposed utilities, including type,
o S '_.. T
U township, tax map-block-lot sizes, hydrants, valves, manholes
references existing and proposed curbs, gutters and culverts,
U C Parent Parcel Identification # including sizes and grades
..'
U deed book and page # of property YA. location and width of alleys, sidewalks, bike Lanes,
to be subdivided transit systems, and bus stops
(please complete reverse side)
ti
boundary described with bearings typical street cross-sections and intersection
i and distances details including design and width of travetway and
::
total acreage of the tract and shoulders
acreage of Lots, including and .. .... horizontal alignment and general curve data (public
O
excluding area within rights-of-way
roads)
centerline radius on all proposed streets
control corner
jef.-..: proposed lot Lines with dimensions permanent features such as buildings, cemeteries,
lot & block numbers historic landmarks
adjoining Lot Layout names of adjoining property
Ph asing tines
topography at ten foot (10) intervals owners. If subdivided, subdivision plat name, plat
water bodies, streams, fLoodway and ... book L page number, and perimeter lot numbers.
floodpLains ✓ Landscaping and buffer requirements
�Z
V!A,� :':. stream buffers APA: township, corporate and extra-territorial planning
Location and size of parcels dedicated jurisdiction lines which cross the property
Z4 Q) . ....:.
"i:i" location and size of Lots of restricted development
for public use, recreational use or
TJ reserved in common, with purpose noted potential and notation on plat regarding same
impervious surface data (if located in stormwater detention and/or retention sites and
water supply watershed) undisturbed areas for infiltration purposes (if
vicinity map showing general Location Located in water supply watershed)
of subdivision with streets and roads
identified by State road number and
name
C. OTHER SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
1. Twenty-five (25) copies of the preliminary plat.
2. One full size copy of an Orange County Tax map (with tax parcels involved clearly marked in pencil).
3. where municipal or OWASA sewer is not available, a copy of the Preliminary Plat indicating Health
Department soils analysis approval/denial for each Lot shown thereon.
4. Where a private road is proposed a written statement by the applicant or his/her authorized representative
which sets forth the justification for a private road (see Section IV-8-3-d-1 of the Orange County
Subdivision Regulations).
S. Auxiliary documents, in draft form, prepared in accordance with Section VI of this Ordinance which assure
completion and/or maintenance of improvements required by this Ordinance. Such documents may include, but
not be Limited to, a private road maintenance agreement, and articles of incorporation and restrictive
covenants pertaining to a homeowner's association. These documents may be required as necessary as
evidence that the ordinance requirements are being met.
6. Fee - $350.00 plus 55.00 per Lot (1 fee for preliminary and final plat).
1, the applicant, hereby certify that the foregoing application is complete and accurate.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE OWNER' S I ATURE
DATE DATE
FEES: Amount Date Paid Receipt 9
e
MT. WILLING'S SUMMIT
C. Other submittal requirements
7. a. 4 or 5 years to buildout
b. 4 houses per year
C. $90,000 to $100,000 houses including lots
MT. WILLING'S SUMMITS
OApplicant: Johnny Mace
5F Zone: AR, U-ENO-PW, U ENO-CA •8965 A
LUP: AR, WATER SUPPLY WATERSHED
23 77 AC WATER QUALITY CRITICAL AREA YLAC. 5A
SCALE: 1" = 400'
8.21:
e
_ 5E 5B
6149 �8
c o -
6 AC. ,
RO
14 87AC /
A
.67f3 F/ 3B 20 suwE•r c
8.24 AC. 20
501
f 6.34 AC.
47
L _ _ @222 21 3.3 AC.
2.249 �'; 3.54 AC. •116
t - O IIA
9AC. 3 1.38 AC.
4 47 946
ie O IO AG. 63 O .0524
3581 �
0.403 10 AC. 8.04 AC. --
A 18 ? C21
5.3.AC 1259 s
4C 4E ~!;1 AC 32s 43
2.122AC
0947
= •6047
9008 46 S.OJAC 8989 3C 8
:O
�•-- 2AC. 6.E
3D 1.83 AC
e 0844
0
_ . 4631 = — 2 1517c
10.92 AC• O' 2.7 AC.
2.43AC.
7284 e
- e
O 8.6E
I
9
FISCAL.IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR MT.WII.I.NG'S SUMMIT SUBDIVISION
RESIDENTIAL SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH
Prepared by
The Orange County Planning Department
May, 1994
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Mt. Willkes Summit is a proposed 15-lot major subdivision located in Cheeks Township on the
northwest side of Mt.Willing Road.The average lot size is approximately 2.16 acres.All lots will be served
by individual wens and septic tanks, and public roads.
For Mt. Willing's Summit, project build-out is estimated at five years. Housing units will be
constructed, beginning in 1994, with completion of the project scheduled for 1998. Units will consist of
detached single-family homes,and the applicant estimates the average sales price to be$95,000,including
the lot.
METHODOLOGY
Fiscal impact analysis is a projection of the direct, current, public costs and revenues associated
with residential and non residential growth in the jurisdiction in which the growth is taking place. Fiscal
impact analysis considers only direct impact in that it projects only the primary costs that will be incurred
and the immediate revenues that will be generated. It calculates the financial effect of a planned
development or new subdivision by considering the current costs and revenues such a development would
generate if it were completed and occupied today.Fiscal impact analysis does not consider the private costs
of public action. It is concerned only with public (governmental) costs and revenues.
The method used in preparing the fiscal impact analysis is the Service Standard Approach. While
only gross expenditures by service category are derived from the Per Capita Method,the Service Standard
method determines the total number of additional employees by service function that will be required as
a result of growth. This method employs average county government costs per person, average school
costs per pupil, an employee to population ratio, and average operating expenses per employee for each
service category and school district. The number of new employees are projected and multiplied times the
average operating expenses(includes personnel,operating and capital costs)per employee. These average
costs are then weighed against per capita and per pupil revenues to project the total net fiscal impact of
the development.
10
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH
PROJECT FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Section 1 - Project Data
Project Name, Township, School District
Beginning Year, Ending Year, Inflation
Characteristics of Households
Construction Schedule/Cost Data
Section 2 - Local Government and School District Data
Budget Year
Per Capita Revenues
Per Capita Expenditures
Per Student Expenditures
School District Per Employee Expenditures
Employees Per 1000 Population
County Per Employee Expenditure
Other Data
Other Model Constants
School District Data
Section 3 - Demographic Projections Based On Project Data
Total Housing
Total Population
School Children
Additional County Employees
Total
School District Additional Employees
Section
4-Projected Net Fiscal Impact on County
Tax Base
Revenues
Expenditures
Net Fiscal Impact
Section 5- Projected Net Fiscal Impact on School District
Revenues
Expenditures
Net Fiscal Impact
Section 6 - Summary of Projected Impacts
Additional Housing
Additional Population
Additional School Children
Tax Base
County Government Balance
School District Balance
Total Net Fiscal Impact
EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND DATA SOURCES
RESIDENTIALFISCAL IMPACT TEMPLATE: SERVICE STANDARD METHOD 11
Bureau of Economic& Business Research — University of Florida
Modified 11/5/93 — Orange County,NC Planning Department
SECTION 1 — PROJECT DATA: ENTER THE FOLLOWING DATA FOR EACH PROJECT:
PR07EG'Fs Mt;.WMneSSummit.Subdivision
TOWNSHIP: Cheeks
CONSTRUCTION PERIOD:
Beginning;Year. 1994
Ending Year: 1998
Inflatica-Rate:. ` 2.90%
CHARACTERIST14;S OF HOUSEHOLDS:
Pelso s/Htause;
Children/House: 0.49
°l.Nori.Y-Elderly: . looms/:
HOME SALES DATA:
Average Distribution
Number of Sales Price of Units
Year Homes S by Year
95t4> 3> 95Q00 20 OD%
1995 3 95000 20.00%
I96:. 3 450E1E1 20:00%x:.
1997 3 95000 20.00%
1998.: 3:: 95.00Q>
1999 0 0 0.00176
2001 0 0 0.000/0
0.0w
2003 0 0 0.000/0
SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: ENTER"1"IN( )BESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT IN WHICH PROJECT IS TO BE
LOCATED TO GENERATE STUDENT DISTRIBUTION BY SCHOOL TYPE.
School District: School Attendance:
Ora County.
::.. �> .� taDr:ScliooL. SQ°l.
Middle School 23%
Cha l.HR-CUrbd t.o.... :.., .
High.Schoo . 27%
SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN/HOUSEHOLD: ENTER NUMBER OF UNITS BY HOUSING TYPE TO
GENERATE NUMBER OF SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN.
Children School Age
Housin a Units Per House Children
SitigiFaatilX 15, Q:49 7'.
Duplex/Triplex/Quadplex 0 0 0
.. Apartmeat/Coadominium.
Town House 0 0 0
Totals: 15' 0:49` 7
SECTION 2 — LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA 12
BUDGET YEAR:: 1993-94
COUNTY POPULATION: 100758
SCHOOL,DISTRICT:STUDENT POPULATION:. 5444.
COUNTY EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER CAPITA
General Government: 10840 0A01I
Public Safety 134.00 0.0013
Pe... ..Worlis> 50.00 0.0005
Human Services 24629 0.0024
Education: School District ?26.00` 0:0072.
SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER STUDENT
Total. 726.00 0.1334:
COUNTY PER CAPITA REVENUES S : REVENUES PER CAPITA
1'aaes — father T a ..Propert�r 412-70OD 40.96:.
Intergovernmental 8778421 87.12
Service:Charges 29691M. 29.47
Miscellaneous 787197 7.81
COUNTY PER CAPITA EXPENDITURES S : EXPENDrrURES PER CAPITA
General Government.. 6251551. 62:05.
Public Safety 5854402 58.10
Pu1.lic:Works. 2760'x27 27:40
Human Services 15528989 154.12
Educatioa.(Re�urr
Recurring:Capitall: 750000> 7:44.
Non—De utmental 2343967 23.26
COUNTY PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURE S : EXPENDrrURES PER EMPLOYEE
General��`nvemiinem: 6251551: X56493:
Public Safety 5854402 4368957
Pullic:Varks: 2760727` 5521454
......... ....I.I. ...
Human Services 15528989 63051.64
Education.:Rdcurrin ::Capital) .
ZSOOQO> 1033.06>
SCHOOL DISTRICT PER STUDENT EXPENDITURES S : EXPENDITURES PER STUDENT
count y ernmen :. 742017.2: :1363.00:
School District 0 0.00
..State:......
17584881; 3230:14
SCHOOL DISTRICT PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURES S : EXPENDITURES PER EMPLOYEE
._
Gouaty.tsa�erumenl: 74?A172. 102204.2::
School District 0 0.00
Stm
17584881 24221.W
TAX DATA: ENTER APPLICABLE ASSESSMENT RATIO AND ELDERLY EXEMPTION:
Coulity Tax
Rate: 0:7460 Per SIO..Assessed Valuation:
School District Tax Rate ($) 0.0000 Per$100 Assessed Valuation
Assessmettt Ratio_ 100.00.
Elderly Exemption 0 $11,000 Where Applicable
13
SECTION 3 - DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA
YEAR 1994. 1995 1996 1997 L999
HOUSING UNITS 3. 6 9. 12 15
POPULATION 9:. 16
24- 32 40
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 1 1 2. 3 4
Middle 0 1 1. 1 2
High School 0 1 -
2 2
TOTAL 1 3 4 6 7
COUNTY GOVERNMENT
ADDITIONAL EMPLONMES
General Government .0A 0.0
0.0
0.0
Public Safety 4A 0.0 aA. 0.0 0.1-
Public Works .04, 0.0 02 0.0 0:0:.
Human Services G.O.- 0.0 .0.1 0.1 0.1.
TOTAL 0.1 ali 0.2
SCHOOL DISTRICT 0.1 0.2
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
YEAR 1994: 2000 ... .......
2001. 2002 -2003:
HOUSING UNITS 15. 15 1S> 15 i5 q
POPULATION AQ: 40 40 40
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 4 4 4- 4
4:
Middle 2 2,
2 :
High School .2 2 2: 2 2:
TOTAL 7 7 7 -7
COUNTY GOVERNMENT
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
General Government QA> 0.0 0A 0.0
0-0.
Public Safety E 0.1
0.1 0.1.
Public Works 0.0 -0.0--'- 0.0 04:
Human Services 0.1 0.1 0.
TOTAL 0.2 (Y.Z- 0.2 0:2
SCHOOL DISTRICT 0.3 63: 0.3 M3
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
SECTION 4 - PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON COUNTY GOVERNMENT 14
YEAR 1994 1995 1996 1997 im
TAX BASE(51000) 295. 578 880 1191 1510
REVENUES (S)
Property Tax 2126 4314 6565 8882 11265.
Other Taxes 327 673 1038-. 1425 1832
Intergovernmental 695: 1431 2208 3030 3897
Service Charges 235 484 747 1025 1318
Miscellaneous 62.- 128 .198.- 272 349
TOTAL ($) 3446. 7030 .10757* 14633 18663
EXPENDITURES ($)
General Government .495 1019 15-13:. 2158 2776
Public Safety 464 954 1473- 2021 2599
Public Works 219.. 450 .695**. 953 1226
Human Services .1230. 2531 3907
5360 68.94.
Education 2063. 4246 6553-- 8991 11565.:
Non-Departmental -186.. 382 590%
809 1041
TOTAL ($) 4656' 9582 14796
20292
NET FISCAL IMPACTS -1210 -2552 —,.7-4033: -5659 -4438
YEAR .1999:- 2000 2001.: 2002 2001
TAX BASE($1000) 1599 1644: 1693 .1742.*
REVENUES(S)
Property Tax 11928 12274:. 12630 12996:
Other Taxes 1940 :1996.: 2054 21-14:
Intergovernmental 4127 C* 4370 4496
Service Charges 1356: 1396 1436*: 1478 1521
Miscellaneous 360. 370 381 392 4,0.3:
TOTAL ($) 29204.. 19761 20334':. 20923 .21530:
EXPENDITURES($)
General Government .2856: 2939 :3024
3112 32.O2.
Public Safety .2675 2752 2914 2999.
Public Works :1261. 1298 1335 1374 1414
Human Services 7094. 7300 7512.: 7730
Education 11900.. 12245 12600-- 12966 13342
Non-Departmental 107.1 1102 1134. 1167 1201,
TOTAL ($) 26M.7 27636 28437- 29262
3.0-111
NET FISCAL IMPACTS .-7653: -7875 -8104 -8339 -8580
1
SECTION 5 - PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT 15
YEAR 1994 1995 1996. 1997 1998
REVENUES (S)
County 2063>' 4246 6553: 8991 11565
School District 0 0 0 0 0
State 4748:: 9772 15083 20694 26618
TOTAL (S) 6811;. 14018 21636 29685 38182
EXPENDITURES(S)
County 2063 4246 6553: 8991 11565
School District { 0 0:. 0 0
State 4748: 9772 25083 20694 26618
TOTAL (S) 6811: 14018 .21636: 29685 39182
NET FISCAL IMPACTS 0. 0 0 0 0:
YEAR :1.999, 2000 2001; 2002 20.05.
REVENUES (S)
County 1190G.. 12245 12600. 12966 1-3342.
School District Ek? 0 0 0 0
State 2739G, 28184 29001. 29842 30708..
TOTAL ($) 3929Ek 40429 41601: 42808 44.049
EXPENDITURES ($)
County '119IX1: 12245 12600:. 12966 :.13342.
School District .0:. 0 €1 0
State 27390 28184 29001 29842 .30708
TOTAL (S) .39.290 40429 4164I:. 42808 44049
NET FISCAL IMPACTS 6: 0 t}: 0 ..... .
0
SECTION 6 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED DEMOGRAPHIC/FISCALIMPACTS i6
YEAR 1994 1995 1996: 1997 1998
HOUSING UNITS 3. 6 9 12 15
POPULATION 9 16 24 32 40
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 1 1 2:. 3 4
Middle Ei 1 1 1 2
High School 1 1 2
Z
TOTAL 1. 3 4* 6 7
COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0.0: 0.1 GA 0.2 0.2.
SCHOOL EMPLOYEES GA: 0.1 0.2:: 0.2 03
TAX BASE(51000) 285 578 880. 1191 1510
COUNTY BUDGET($)
Revenues 3446. 7030 1.0757 14633 18663
Expenditures .4656 9582 14790:.
20292 26100
BALANCE -2552 4033 -5659 -7439:
SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET
Revenues -6911 14018 21636: 29685 38182
Expenditures 6811 14018 21636. 29685
.38182--
BALANCE 6 0 0. 0 0
COMBINED BUDGETS($)
Revenues .10257 21047 44318 56845
Expenditures 11467 23600 36426 49977 64282:
I BALANCE ..,T47AG.- -2552 -4033. -5659 -7438:
YEAR 1999. 2000 ..... 2002 2003
HOUSING UNITS 1S:. 15 0
POPULATION 40° 40 40: 40 40
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 4: 4 4. 4
Middle 2.. 2 .2.: 2 2:
High School .2 2 2: 2 2
TOTAL 7 7 T 7 7
COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0.2:.' 0.2 02-: 0.2 0.2
SCHOOL EMPLOYEES 03, 0.3 03: 0.3 0.3.:
TAX BASE(51000) 1599 1645: 1693 1742
COUNTY BUDGET(S)
Revenues 19204 19761
20334: 20923 21530-
Expenditures .26857 27636 28437:' 29262 30111
BALANCE -7875 -8104.. -8339 -8580
SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET(S)
Revenues
40429 4160.1*:. 42808 4404.9
Expenditures .392.90 40429 41601. 42808 44049.
BALANCE 0 0: 0 01
COMBINED BUDGETS(S)
Revenues 58493: 60190 61935 63731 65580:
Expenditures 66147 68065 70039: 72070 74160
IBALANCE -7653 -7875 -8104 -8339
1
•
17
EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND DATA SOURCES
SECTION 1 -PROJECT DATA
Project data includes information about the specific development project. Much, if not all, of the
information is supplied by the applicant. Data inputs include:
Project Name: Name of the project.
Township: Township in which the project is located.
School District: School district in which the project is located.
Beginning Year: The first year of the project in which dwelling units are completed and
occupied.
Ending Year: The last year in which dwelling units are completed and occupied. The template is set to
calculate fiscal impacts for a ten-year period.
Inflation Rate: Unless an inflation rate is entered, the template will calculate fiscal impacts based on
constant dollars. Since the inflation rate changes frequently, the Finance Department must be contacted
for the most recent figure.
Persons/Household:The estimated average number of persons/household(dwelling unit) based on 1990
Census data for the township in which the project is located.This information is supplied by the Planning
Department and will be updated as necessary using population projections and building permit data
Children/Household: The estimated average number of school age children/household (dwelling unit)
based on 1990 Census data for the township in which the project is located. This information is supplied
by the Planning Department and will be updated as necessary using school membership data
%Non-Elderly:N.C.General Statutes permit an$11,000 exemption to the elderly and disabled who meet
certain income criteria In the event that elderly units are part of the project, the percentage of eligible
non-elderly units is entered. The tax base will automatically be adjusted to reflect the exemption.
Number of Homes: The number of dwelling units to be constructed in the project in each year.
Average Sales Price:The average sales price of all dwelling units based on the number and sales price
of dwelling unit types to be constructed in each year.
i
18
SECTION 2 -LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA
Local government data includes information regarding expenditures required to provide County
services and revenues received based on the approved Orange County budget for the fiscal year in which
the project is considered for approval.All information derived from the approved budget remains constant
throughout a fiscal year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of a new budget.
Local government revenue and expenditure information is compiled on a per capita (per person)
basis. Per capita figures are derived by dividing the total expenditures for a particular service function or
revenue source by the estimated population of Orange County for the year in which the project is
considered for approval. Populations estimates are prepared by the Planning Department.
Data inputs include the following.
Budget Year: The current fiscal year; i.e., 1993-94.
Per Capita Revenues: The sources of revenue by major category are as follows:
Taxes-Other Than Property:Revenues from taxes other than property taxes include those from sales
and use taxes, franchise taxes, and animal taxes.
Intergovernmental Aid: Revenues from this source in the form of categorical aid or shared-tax
, ego
revenues, are provided through State and federal assistance programs.
Service Charges: Service (or user) charges support numerous functions and are charged to those who
voluntarily receive governmental services or use governmental facilities.
Miscellaneous:Miscellaneous revenues include interest earnings on investments,proceeds from license
and
permit f and all other revenues.
Per Capita Expenditures: Expenditures by major category are as follows.
General Government: Services related to the legislative, administrative, and legal functions
of ove
g rnment.
Public Safety: Law enforcement services and emergency medical services.
Public Works:
Efforts related to the maintenance of County-owned ty caned property and the provision of
sanitation (solid waste disposal) services.
Human Services: Departments responsible for the provision of health, social, and recreation-related
services.
Education: Orange County supports two school units, the Orange County school system and the Chapel
Hill\Carrboro school system. This category includes appropriations made to the designated school system
for Capital items. Capital funds are used for w
Recurring P �g P general maintenance,purchase of ne
equipmentifurnishings and vehicle maintenance.
Non-Departmental: Contributions to agencies providing cultural and social services outside the formal
structure of county government. Other expenditures include equipment replacement and contingency
funds. Although there are no employees generated by this category,it has been included as an operating
expenditure. It will be included in Section 4,"Total Annual County Expenditure." These expenditures will
be calculated on a per capita basis as opposed to a per employee basis.
19
Per Student Expenditures:Information regarding expenditures required to provide educational services
and revenues received are based on the approved school system budgets for the fiscal year in which the
project is considered for approval. All information derived from the approved budgets remains constant
throughout a fis d year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of new budgets.
Expenditure information is compiled on a per student basis for County Government Current Expense,
School District and State appropriations. County Government Current Expense funds are used for general
operation purposes including Instruction and Support Services. Federal revenues and expenditures and
other local revenues such as Fund Balance have not been included since they are not directly growth
related Per student figures are derived by dividing the total appropriation for educational purposes from
a particular source by the estimated number of students to be enrolled in the applicable school system for
the year in which the project is considered for approval. Student enrollments are obtained from the
approved school system budgets.
County Govermnent: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations to the school systems
by Orange County for Current Expense. The minimum level of per student appropriation is determined
by the State Board of Education.
School District:Expenditures in this category are unique to the Chapel Hill-Carrboro school system and
are based on the level of expenditures possible through assessment of a supplementary school tax.
State: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations from the State Board of Education.
School District Per Employee Expenditure: Expenditures per employee based on County, School
District and State appropriations, and the total number of school district employees.
Employees Per 1000 Population:The number of employees in a particular service category per 1000
population.
County Per Employee Expenditure: The average operating and capital expenses per employee in a
particular service category. Total expenses in each category includes personnel,operating and capital costs.
Other Data
County Government Tax Rate: The County tax rate per $100 of assessed valuation. Since the per
capita method focuses only on operating expenditures,the tax rate is reduced by an amount equal to the
debt service payments from property taxes for capital projects.
School District Tax Rate:The supplementary tax assessed on behalf of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro school
system.
Assessment Ratio:The ratio of market(sales)value to assessed value based on information supplied by
the Tax Office. The assessment ratio is used to convert market value to assessed value for the purpose
of computing the tax base.
Other Model Constants
Elderly Exemption:For projects developed partially or exclusively for elderly(66 and older) or disabled
individuals whose annual income does not exceed$12,000, an$11,000 tax exemption is used in projecting
the tax base.
School District Employees Per Student: The number of employees per student in a specific school
district.
20
r
SECTION 3 -DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA
Demographic projections provide information about the number of new residents and school children
anticipated in Orange County resulting from project development.Projections also provide the number of
additional employees required per service function and school district as a result of the new development.
Total Housing Units: The cumulative total of new housing units added each year by project
development.
Total Population:The total population added each year by a project derived by multiplying the number
of homes to be constructed by the number of persons per household (see Section 1).
School Population: The total number of school children added each year by a project derived by
multiplying the number of homes constructed by the number of children per household (see Section 1).
Additional County Employees: The number of additional employees required per service category
based on project development.
Total: Total of all additional county employees required based on project development.
School District Additional Employees: The number of additional employees required per school
district based on the project development.
SECTION 4-PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON COUNTY
Tax Base:The tax base represents the increase in assessed property value expected each year resulting
from project development.The values shown are in$1,000's and are derived from a formula which includes
the number and sales price of homes, and the assessment ratio. Where applicable, the percentage of
non elderly units and elderly exemption are also used.
Revenues:All revenues are derived from a formula which multiplies the per capita revenues (Section 2)
times the projected population(Section 3). The exception to this is the property tax which multiplies the
tax base times the county government tax rate.
Expenditures: All expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies the per employee
expenditure (Section 2) times the number of additional employees (Section 3).
Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures and
projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs Orange County more to provide services
to a project than it receives in revenues.A positive net balance indicates that more revenues are received
than it costs to serve a project. Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset negative
balances in another.
I
a
21
SECTION 6 -PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Revenues: The County contribution is derived by transferring education expenditures by County
government(Section 4).Revenues derived from the school district tax are derived by multiplying the school
district tax times the tax base. State revenues are derived by multiplying the per student expenditure
figure times the total projected number of school children (Section 3).
Expenditures: Expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies each per student
expenditure (Section 2) times the total projected number of school children (Section 3) and adding the
results.
Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures and
projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs the school system more to provide
educational services for children in a project than it receives in revenues.A positive net balance indicates
that more revenues are received than it costs to serve a project.Positive net balances in one project may
thus be used to offset negative balances in another.
SECTION 6 - ST.MBIARY OF PROJECTED BIPACTS
22
JUNE 20,1994 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES
Sunset Ridge Subdivision subject to the
conditions contained in the Resolution of
Approval. (A copy an attachment to these minutes
on pages . )
Walters asked the reason for the two temporary
cul-de-sacs. Kirk responded that they would be
extended if the properties around them should
ever be developed.
Waddell asked if the City of Mebane had reviewed
the plan since their jurisdiction borders the
subdivision on one side. Kirk responded that
there was no comment from Mebane when the plan
was submitted in 1987 nor has there been any
comment with this submittal.
Rosemond asked about the reserved common
recreation area. Kirk responded that the common
area was part of Phase One which was recorded in
1987. Kirk indicated it was a common area with a
pond but no improvements were proposed. Rosemond
continued asking if the Homeowners' Association
was contributing time and/or money for the
maintenance of the common area. Kirk responded
that it had been deeded to the Homeowners'
Association; however, since there were no
improvements on the property, he felt that dues
had not been collected for maintenance.
MOTION: Burklin moved approval as recommended by the
Planning Staff. Seconded by Boland.
VOTE: Unanimous.
(2) Mt. Willing's Summit
( 15 Lots Cheeks Township)
Presentation by Eddie Kirk.
The property is located on the northwest side of
Mt. Willing Road (SR 1120) just west of Chestnut
Ridge Church Road (SR 1125) in Cheeks Township.
The property is zoned Agricultural Residential
(AR) and U-ENO-PW. A portion of the property is
in the Upper Eno Protected Watershed district and
a portion is in the Critical Area (U-ENO-CA) .
Fifteen lots are proposed out of the tract of
34 .59 acres. The average lot size is 2. 16 acres.
Ledge Court, a proposed public road off Mt.
Willing Road will serve the subdivision. Mt.
Willing Road is a paved secondary road and is
designated as a collector road in the Land Use
23
element of the Comprehensive Plan.
This Concept Plan was approved by the Orange
County Planning Board on December 20, 1993 with
the condition that Lot 16 receive access from the
subdivision road.
Agency comments were received from Environmental
Health, Emergency Management, Soil & Water
Conservation, Recreation & Parks, and NCDOT.
Applicable comments have been incorporated into
the Resolution of Approval.
The Planning Staff recommends approval of the
Preliminary Plan for Mt. Willing's Summit subject
to the conditions contained in the Resolution of
Approval. (A copy of the Resolution is an
attachment to these minutes on pages . )
Waddell asked the distance to the reservoir.
Kirk responded that he did know the exact
distance.
Rosemond asked about lots in the water quality
critical area. Kirk responded that lots 5-11 are
in the critical area and are all larger than the
2-acre minimum lot size. Impervious surface
standards also apply.
Waddell noted that lots 9 and 10 have steep
slopes. Kirk responded that the Health
Department has determined that there are suitable
septic sites and buildable areas on those lots.
MOTION: Barrows moved approval as recommended by the
Planning Staff. Seconded by Jobsis.
VOTE: Unanimous.
b. Partial Width Right-of-Way
( 1) Danny Settlemyre
Presentation by Jane Garrett.
This item is to consider a request for a
reduction in right-of-way from 50 feet to 30
feet.
Danny Settlemyre wishes to create a 1. 16 acre
lot out of a 95.08 acre tract. The property is
located east of Dimmocks Mill Road (SR 1134) . A