HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 09-19-2007-6hORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: September 19, 2007
Action Agenda.
Item No. ~ej_~ _
SUBJECT: Decision Points, Steps and Timelines Regarding a Possible May 6, 2008 Local
Revenue Options Referendum
DEPARTMENT: Budget
PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) No
ATTACHMENT(S):
INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donna Coffey, (919) 245-2151
PURPOSE: To consider decision points, steps and timelines regarding a possible May
6; 2008 Local Revenue Options Referendum.
BACKGROUND: Local governments in North Carolina have historically relied heavily
upon ad valorem property taxes as their major .source of revenue. For a number of
years, the Orange County Board of County Commissioners, .the North Carolina
Association of County Commissioners and many other Boards across the state, have
lobbied the General Assembly for legislative authority to expand counties'' revenue
options and lessen counties' reliance on properly taxes. During the 2007 legislative
session, the General Assembly granted counties the ability to enact new revenue
options.
The new revenue options available for counties include a .4% land transfer tax and an
additional ~/a-cent sales tax. There, are several important factors related to the new
options:
Counties must have voter approval in order to enact either of these taxes
The ballot can include referenda for both the land transfer tax and the '/a-cent
sales tax
There are no restrictions on the use of either of the new local revenues
-~ Should the Board choose to voluntarily designate the uses of the new revenue(s)
(for ,example for capital infrastructure or to retire debt), the ballot language
cannot stipulate uses of the new revenues
~k Counties cannot enact both revenues -should Commissioners include both
referenda on the ballot and voters agree to both of them, Commissioners would
have to choose which local revenue to authorize
The NC Association of County Commissioners recommends "that counties
undertake extensive public education campaigns prior to the election to inform
voters about the new revenues
According to information included on the NC Association of County Commissioners
website (http://www.ncacc.org/revenueoptions 083107.html), as of September 4, 2007:
Twenty-six counties across the state have decided to include the local revenue
options question on the November 2007 ballot
o Eleven counties (Brunswick, Chatham, Gates, Henderson, Hoke, Macon,
Moore, Pender, Polk, Swain and Union) have decided to pursue the 0.4
percent land transfer tax option
o Eleven counties (Catawba, Columbus, Cumberland, Greene, Hertford,
Lenoir, Martin, Pitt, Robeson, Sampson and Surry) have decided to
pursue the sales tax option
o Five counties (Davie, Graham, Harnett, Johnston and Rutherford) have
decided to put both options in front of voters
Six counties (Caswell, Duplin, Edgecombe, Lee, Onslow and Pamlico) have
announced plans to pursue one of the options in the May 2008 primary election.
Commissioners directed staff during the August 30, 2007 work session to provide, at
the September 19, 2007 meeting, information on tentative decision points, steps and
timelines including a public education component that would be required in order to
include the local revenue options referendum on the May 6, 2008 ballot.
Decision Points
Whether to Seek Authority for the Local Revenue Option(s) -While the
Board has discussed a variety of topics related to the two new local revenue
options (public education, timing, etc.), Commissioners have not made a formal
decision on whether. they wish to ask for voter approval of the new revenues.
Whether To Include the Local Revenue Option(s) Referendum on the May 6,
2008 Ballot - As stated earlier, the Board has discussed a number of matters
regarding the newly authorized legislation and revenue options. The next
scheduled election date during the current fiscal year is the May 6, 2008 primary
followed by November 5, 2008 in the following fiscal year 2008-09 (there is only
one scheduled election date during fiscal year 2008-09).
Whether to Appoint a Community Advisory Task Force -The Board .may
wish to seek input from community partners regarding which tax(es) to include on
the ballot and best ways to use the revenues. The function of the advisory group
would be similar to past bond education committees who provided a valuable link
between the County, the community and the use of voter approved bonds.
,Q Use of New Revenues -While counties are not restricted with regard to the use
of the new local revenues and the ballot language cannot stipulate uses of the
new revenues, the Board may wish to state their intent to designate the proceeds
from the new revenues. for specific. purposes.
Which Tax(es) to Include on the Ballot - As stated earlier in this agenda
abstract, the Board has the discretion to put the land transfer tax, the ~/a-cent
sales tax or both of the new revenue referenda on the ballot.
Major Steps and Timelines
Per information from the Orange County Board of Elections, the deadline for
Commissioners to notify the Board of Elections of their intent to seek voter approval of
the local revenue options is February 29, 2008. The chart below provides a general
sense of major steps and timelines that need to occur should the Board choose to seek
voter approval of the new local revenue option(s) on May 6, 2008.
BOCC'Decision Point - Commissioners state their
intent to either seek or not seek authority for the local September 19, 2007
revenue option(s)
BOCC Decision Point -Commissioners state their
intent to either include or not include local revenue September 19, 2007
option(s) referendum on the May 6, 2008 ballot
BOCC Decision Point -Commissioners state their
intent to either appoint or not appoint a Local September 19, 2007
Revenue Options Community Advisory Group
BOCC Decision Points - If, on September 19,
BOCC declares its intention to appoint a Local
Revenue Options Community Advisory Group, the
next steps would be:
Adopt Resolution of Intent to Create Local October 9, 2007
Revenue Options Community Advisory Group
ak Approve Advisory Group Charge
~k Determine structure of Advisory Group
Advertise for Local Revenue Options Community October 10 through 24, 2007
Advisory Group volunteers
BOCC Decision Point - BOCC review advisory November 5, 2007
group applications and appoint volunteers
Organizational meeting of Local Revenue Options No later than November 16,
Community advisory Group ~ 2007
4
Local Revenue Options Community Advisory Group Completed no later than
Meetings ~ January 11, 2008
Report from Local Revenue Options Community January 29, 2008
Advisory Group to BOCC
BOCC Decision Point -Final decisions
Use of new revenues . No later than February 19,
Which tax(es) to include on the ballot 2008
Next steps -Public Education Initiative
Notify Orange County Board of Elections of Board's No later than February 29,
Intent to Seek Voter Approval of [_ocal Revenue 2008
Option(s) on May 6, 2008
Public Education Initiative (examples might include
informational brochures mailed to voters and February, March, April 2008
distributed at major community functions and
newspaper articles by community leaders)
Primary Election May 6, 2008
It is likely that staff will have additional information to share with the Board and public
following a seminar sponsored by the NC Association of County Commissioners
scheduled for September 19, 2007.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Should the Board receive voter approval of the new local
revenue options on May 6, 2008, Orange County would not receive any proceeds in the
current 2007-08 fiscal year from enacting the new funding sources.
1/4 Cent Sales Tax
o October 1, 2008 is the earliest date that the sales tax would become
effective if Commissioners levied the sales tax via resolution following a
May 2008 referendum.
o The State would distribute the new'/4-cent sales tax to counties based on
point of delivery and not on a per capita basis.
o As authorized, the new sales tax would not apply to food purchases.
o There are no legislative requirements for counties to share the newly
authorized'/4-cent sales tax with local municipalities.
o Based on information received from the NC Association of County
Commissioners; Orange County can expect $3,031,453 annually from the
'/-cent sales tax -the equivalent of about 2.4 cents in current ad valorem
property tax.
The effective date of the ~/4-cent sales tax would be October 1,
2008 if the voters approved it on May 6, 2008 meaning that the
County would receive 9 months of revenue collections or about 3/4
of the NCACC's annual projections of $3,031,453 during fiscal year
2008-09.
o According to statistics, a family of three with a median income of $55,000
per year could expect to pay an additional $51 per year with the new ~/4-
cent sales tax.
~; .4% Land Transfer Tax
o Should Commissioners receive voter approval of the land transfer tax on
May 6, 2008, the effective date of the tax would be July 1, 2008.
o The County currently levies a .2% land transfer tax -more commonly
referred to as "deed, stamps". The newly authorized land transfer tax
would increase the tax by .4% bringing the total charge to .6% of the real
estate sale price.
^ The Register of Deeds Office collects the current .2% deed stamp
revenues at the time of real estate sales. As mandated by the
State, the Register of Deeds remits 50% of the current .2% deed
stamps collections to the State of NC. During fiscal year 2006-07,
Orange County collected $2,056,539 in deed stamps and remitted
one-half of that amount ($1,028,270) to the State as their share of
the collections.
^ There are no legislative requirements for counties to share the
newly authorized .4% land transfer tax with the State or with local
municipalities.
o Based on information received from the NC Association of County
Commissioners, Orange County can expect $4,013,532 annually from the
land transfer tax -the equivalent of about 3.2 cents in current ad valorem
property tax.
^ Annual collections would likely vary depending on the economy and
actual property sales. As a point of reference, the amount of
revenue generated by the .2% deed stamps increased an average
of 17% annually between fiscal years 2002-03 and 2004-05. More
recent numbers (fiscal years 2005-06 and 2006-07) reflect about a
2% annual increase in revenue collections.
o A .4% land transfer tax would .equate to $800 on a home sold for
$200,000 and $2,000 on a home sold for $500,000. Both of these would
be in addition to the .2% deed stamps currently collected by the Register
of Deeds. The Register of Deeds would collect the monies at the time of
sale.
RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends that the Board of County
Commissioners:
1. State their intent to either seek or not seek authority for the local revenue
option(s);
2. State their intent to either include
referendum on the May 6, 2008 ballot;
3. State their intent to either appoint or
and,
or not include local revenue option(s)
not appoint a community advisory group;
4. Provide direction to staff on proceeding with enactment of the local revenue
options.