HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 11-05-2015 - 5-c - Zoning Atlas Amendment - Jacobs Glass Rezoning - Closure of Public Hearing and Action (No Additional Comments Accepted) 1
ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: November 5, 2015
Action Agenda
Item No. 5-c
SUBJECT: Zoning Atlas Amendment - Jacobs Glass Rezoning - Closure of Public Hearing
and Action (No Additional Comments Accepted)
DEPARTMENT: Planning and Inspections PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) Yes
ATTACHMENTS: INFORMATION CONTACT:
1. Property and Vicinity Map Patrick Mallett, Planner II, (919) 245-2577
2. Excerpt of Draft September 8, 2015 Michael Harvey, Planner III, (919) 245-2597
Quarterly Public Hearing Minutes Craig Benedict, Director, (919) 245-2592
3. Excerpt of Draft October 7, 2015
Planning Board Minutes
4. Planning Board Approved Statement of
Consistency
5. Statement of Consistency
6. Draft Ordinance Approving Rezoning
PURPOSE: To receive the Planning Board recommendation, close the public hearing, and
make a decision on an owner initiated request to rezone a split zoned 9.8 acre parcel of
property in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.9.2 of the Unified Development
Ordinance (hereafter `UDO'):
FROM: Economic Development Eno Lower Intensity (EDE-1), Economic
Development Eno Higher Intensity (EDE-2), Lower Eno Protected
Watershed Protection Overlay District, and Major Transportation Corridor
(MTC) Overlay District
TO: Economic Development Eno Higher Intensity (EDE-2), Lower Eno
Protected Watershed Protection Overlay District, and Major Transportation
Corridor (MTC) Overlay District
BACKGROUND: This item was presented at the September 8, 2015 Quarterly Public Hearing.
Materials from the September 8, 2015 Quarterly Public Hearing can be viewed at-
ht!p-://www.oranqecountvnc.qov/document center/ OCCAgenda inutes/150908.pdf.
During the public hearing the following questions/comments were made:
1. A BOCC member asked if the property owner will have to maintain land use buffers along
NC 751 and adjacent residential property, both in Orange and Durham counties, if the
property were rezoned.
STAFF COMMENT. The property owner will have to comply with established buffers,
including:
2
a. The 100 foot perimeter Economic Development District (EDD) buffer required
under Section 6.8.12 (C) (1) of the UDO along the southern property line (i.e.
railroad right-of-way) and eastern property line (i.e. Durham County line), and
b. A 20 foot Type A land use buffer along NC 751 in accordance with Section 6.8.12
(C) (13) of the UDO.
The aforementioned land use buffers are the same for EDE-1 and EDE-2 zoned
property.
2. A Planning Board member asked if approval of the rezoning petition grants development
rights allowing for the expansion of the existing commercial operation.
STAFF COMMENT. As indicated during the public hearing, approval of the zoning
atlas amendment does not eliminate the applicant's responsibility to apply for, and
obtain, site plan approval and a Zoning Compliance Permit allowing for the expansion
of the existing business as required by Section 2.5 of the UDO.
An excerpt of the public hearing minutes is contained in Attachment 2.
Procedural Information: In accordance with 2.8.8 of the UDO, any evidence not presented at
the public hearing must be submitted in writing prior to the Planning Board's recommendation.
Additional oral evidence may be considered by the Planning Board only if it is for the purpose of
presenting information also submitted in writing. The public hearing is held open to a date
certain for the purpose of the BOCC receiving the Planning Board's recommendation and any
submitted written comments.
Planning Director's Recommendation: The Planning Director recommends approval of
proposed Zoning Atlas Amendment application and further recommends approval of the-
i. Statement of Consistency, as contained in Attachment 5, indicating the proposed
zoning atlas amendment is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan and the
project is reasonable and in the public interest, and
ii. Ordinance amending the Orange County Zoning Atlas as contained in Attachment 6.
Planning Board Recommendation: At its October 7, 2015 meeting, the Board voted
unanimously to recommend approval of the Statement of Consistency and the Ordinance
approving the Zoning Atlas Amendment. Excerpt of draft minutes of the Planning Board meeting
are included in Attachment 3.
The Planning Board's signed Statement of Consistency is included within Attachment 4.
Agenda materials from the October 7, 2015 Planning Board meeting can be viewed at-
ht cket PB f.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: This request has been reviewed by various County departments who
have determined that the approval or denial of the request would not create the need for
additional funding for the provision of County services. Costs associated with advertising,
including the public hearing notice and mailings, were paid by the applicant in accordance with
the adopted Orange County Fee Schedule.
Costs associated with permitting development of any future project shall be paid by the
applicant in accordance with the adopted Orange County Fee Schedule (i.e. erosion control,
stormwater management, building, zoning, etc.).
3
SOCIAL JUSTICE IMPACT: The following Orange County Social Justice Goals is applicable to
this agenda item:
• GOAL: ESTABLISH SUSTAINABLE AND EQUITABLE LAND-USE AND
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES
The fair treatment and meaningful involvement of people of all races, cultures, incomes
and educational levels with respect to the development and enforcement of
environmental laws, regulations, policies, and decisions. Fair treatment means that no
group of people should bear a disproportionate share of the negative environmental
consequences resulting from industrial, governmental and commercial operations or
policies.
RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends the Board-
1. Receive the Planning Board's recommendation;
2. Close the public hearing;
3. Deliberate on the application as desired; and
4. Decide accordingly and/or adopt the Statement of Consistency, contained within
Attachment 5, and the Ordinance amending the Zoning Atlas, contained within
Attachment 6, as recommended by the Planning Board and staff.
Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map 4
70 — FII'1 F -H RD^
o.
of E! ;.o-
4w._
UwJ
t I c
7.7 acrea areax x ■■■
Z 4 ^;
to be zoned °C
from EDE-1 ,► -Y '
�
E ;
Lower no ,' to EDE-2
Protected M ,,
Watershed t
\
A.
t4�
r�
�. 751
WA
,
z
� s
I.
1 C.
2
�• 1±' � I Major
Transportation
ii NA Corridor
— Orange County
----• Boundary
EDE-1
'w.: • - EDE-2
k-`
I
PIN#: 0803305174 N 1 in=200 feet
Parcel of Interest Zoning LR JACOBS LLC 0 100
4915 HILLSBOROUGH RD Feet
Orange
Major Transportation Corridor Parcels °' `t DURHAM, NC 27705 County Planning and Inspections
Brian Carson(8/25/2015)
1 5
Attachment 2
Excerpt of Minutes
1 DRAFT MINUTES
2 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
3 QUARTERLY PUBLIC HEARING
4 September 8, 2015
5 7:00 P.M.
6
7 The Orange County Board of Commissioners met with the Orange County Planning
8 Board for a Quarterly Public Hearing on September 8, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. at the Whitted Building,
9 in Hillsborough, N.C.
10
11 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chair Earl McKee and Commissioners Barry Jacobs,
12 Mia Burroughs, Mark Dorosin, Bernadette Pelissier, Renee Price and Penny Rich
13 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ABSENT:
14 COUNTY ATTORNEY PRESENT: James Bryan (Staff Attorney)
15 COUNTY STAFF PRESENT: County Manager Bonnie Hammersley, Deputy County Manager
16 Travis Myren and Clerk to the Board Donna Baker (All other staff members will be identified
17 appropriately below)
18 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Pete Hallenbeck and Planning Board
19 members Lisa Stuckey, Herman Staats, Paul Guthrie, Laura Nicholson, Andrea Rohrbacher,
20 Maxecine Mitchell, H.T. "Buddy" Hartley, James Lea, Tony Blake
21 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: Lydia Wegman
22
23 Chair McKee called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m.
24
25 A. OPENING REMARKS FROM THE CHAIRS
26 None
27
28 B. PUBLIC CHARGE
29 Chair Hallenbeck dispensed with the reading of the Public Charge.
30
31 C. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
32
33 1. Zoning Atlas Amendment—To review an application requesting the rezoning of an
34 approximately nine acre parcel of property located at 4915 Hillsborough Road within the
35 Eno Township from Economic Development Eno Lower Intensity (EDE-1), Economic
36 Development Eno Higher Intensity (EDE-2), Lower Eno Protected Watershed Protection
37 Overlay District, and Major Transportation Corridor (MTC) Overlay District to Economic
38 Development Eno Higher Intensity (EDE-2), Lower Eno Protected Watershed Protection
39 Overlay District, and Major Transportation Corridor (MTC) Overlay District.
40
41 Patrick Mallet, Current Planning, presented the following PowerPoint slides:
42
43 BACKGROUND
44 PIN: 0803-30-5174
45 Size of Parcel: 9.87 (7.7 acres rezoned)
46 Future Land Use Element Map: Economic Development—Transition; Resource
47 Protection
2 6
1 Growth Management System Designation: Urban
2 Existing Conditions: The property is partially developed as the Jacobs Glass
3 Company.
4 Access: The property has direct access US70E/Hillsborough Rd.
5
6 REQUEST:
7 Property is split zoned EDE-1/EDE-2.
8 7.7 acre EDE-1 portion was originally part of Duke Forest, which was sold to applicant
9 as surplus property.
10 Applicant is seeking to EDE-2 zoning on the entire tract to allow for an expansion of its
11 glass assembly business.
12
13 FUTURE LAND USE MAP:
14
15 STAFF ASSESSMENT:
16 The application is complete.
17 The property is of sufficient size.
18 Rezoning consistent with the Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan, Growth
19 Management System Map, and Eno Small Area Plan.
20 Eliminates split zoning on property.
21
22 RECOMMENDATION:
23 1. Receive the proposal to amend the Zoning Atlas.
24 2. Conduct the Public Hearing and accept public, Board of County Commissioners
25 (BOCC), and Planning Board comment on the proposed amendment.
26 3. Refer the matter to the Planning Board with a request that a recommendation be
27 returned to the Board of County Commissioners in time for the November 5, 2015
28 BOCC regular meeting.
29 4. Adjourn the public hearing until November 5, 2015 in order to receive and accept the
30 Planning Board's recommendation and any submitted written comments.
31
32 Maxecine Mitchell arrived at 7.10 p.m.
33
34 Chad Abbot, Summit Design and Engineering, said he is here representing Mr. Jacobs,
35 who has operated a glass company on the property since 1986. He said Mr. Jacobs has
36 needed to expand his business for about 10 to 15 years. He said Mr. Jacobs is willing to
37 contribute to the Economic Development District. He added that Mr. Jacobs does need to
38 expand his business and will need to move if he cannot expand on the current property. He
39 said Mr. Jacobs would like to remain on the current property.
40 Chad Abbott said as the land was originally part of Duke Forest, it is understandable that
41 it was designated as a Resource Protection Area. He added that Duke Forest has seen fit to
42 sell the land as it is separated from the rest of the forest by railroad tracks.
43 He said the application and all required materials have been submitted and the staff has
44 found them in compliance with the Future Land Use Map.
3 7
1 Commissioner Price asked if the zoning is granted will the property borders protect the
2 neighbors to the east as well as residential areas to the south of the railroad.
3 Patrick Mallet said the Railroad Right of Way (ROW) is 250 feet and a good portion of
4 this property is part of the Duke Forest property. He said there is a 100-foot buffer along the
5 County lines.
6 Chad Abbott said the buffer is not associated with the resource protection area. He said
7 that the whole Economic Development District is required to have a 100-foot buffer around it.
8 Commissioner Rich asked if it is common to have an EDD-1 and EDD-2 within the same
9 property and if there is any precedent
10 Michael Harvey said it is not uncommon and there other areas of split zoning in the
11 County.
12 Commissioner Rich asked if property owners are encouraged not to split the zoning.
13 Michael Harvey said the County works with property owners to try and find solutions.
14 Commissioner Rich asked if the Planning Board had any comments. She said she
15 would rather not be reactionary.
16 Michael Harvey said the County has been working for almost a year to reach out to
17 owners of split-zoned properties to work out the best solutions. He said a joint amendment to
18 the Zoning Atlas Map is moving forward. He said there are also properties that are split zoned
19 commercial and residential.
20
21 Public Comment:
22 NONE
23
24 A motion was made by Commissioner Price, seconded by Commissioner Pelissier to
25 approve:
26
27 1. Referring the matter to the Planning Board with a request that a recommendation be returned
28 to the Board of County Commissioners in time for the November 5, 2015 BOCC regular
29 meeting; and
30 2. Adjourning the public hearing until November 5, 2015 in order to receive and accept the
31 Planning Board's recommendation and any submitted written comments.
32
33 VOTE: UNANIMOUS
8
ATTACHMENT 3
Excerpt of Minutes DRAFT
1 MINUTES
2 PLANNING BOARD
3 OCTOBER 7,2015
4 REGULAR MEETING
5
6 MEMBERS PRESENT: Peter Hallenbeck (Chair), Cheeks Township Representative; Lydia Wegman-At-Large Chapel
7 Hill Township (Vice Chair); Tony Blake, Bingham Township Representative; Paul Guthrie, At-Large Chapel Hill
8 Township; Buddy Hartley, Little River Township Representative; Laura Nicholson, Eno Township Representative;
9 Lisa Stuckey, Chapel Hill Township Representative; Maxecine Mitchell,At-Large Bingham Township; Herman Staats,
10 At-Large, Cedar Grove Township; James Lea, Cedar Grove Township Representative;Andrea Rohrbacher,At-Large
11 Chapel Hill Township;
12
13 MEMBERS ABSENT: None
14
15 STAFF PRESENT: Craig Benedict, Planning Director; Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor; Perdita Holtz,
16 Planning Systems Coordinator;Ashley Moncado, Special Projects Planner; Patrick Mallett, Planner II;
17
18
19 AGENDA ITEM 7: ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT—To make a recommendation on a request to rezone an
20 approximately 9 acre parcel of property located at 4915 Hillsborough Road within the Eno
21 Township from Economic Development Eno Lower Intensity(EDE-1), Economic
22 Development Eno Higher Intensity(EDE-2), Lower Eno Protected Watershed Protection
23 Overlay District, and Major Transportation Corridor(MTC)Overlay District to Economic
24 Development Eno Higher Intensity(EDE-2), Lower Eno Protected Watershed Protection
25 Overlay District, and Major Transportation Corridor(MTC)Overlay District. This item was
26 heard at the September 8,2015 quarterly public hearing.
27
28 Presenter: Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor
29
30 Michael Harvey reviewed the abstract.
31
32 Michael Harvey: There were no comments made by the public at the public hearing. We have provided on pages 13
33 and 14 of the abstract, answers to the two questions asked at the public hearing concerning land use buffers and site
34 plan approval. The Planning Director is recommending approval and the statement of consistency has been provided
35 to you in Attachment 2 and ordinance amending the zoning atlas in Attachment 3. We are asking you tonight to make
36 a recommendation on this petition which will be presented to the BOCC at their November 5 regular meeting.
37
38 Pete Hallenbeck: We have a statement of consistency to vote on. Do I have any motions to approve the statement of
39 consistency?
40
41 MOTION made by Tony Blake to recommend approval of the statement of consistency. Buddy Hartley seconded.
42 VOTE: Unanimous
43
44 MOTION made by James Lea to approve the ordinance of approval. Herman Staats seconded.
45 VOTE: Unanimous
46
1
Attachment 4
9
STATEMENT OF CONSISTENCY
OF PROPOSED ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENTS WITH THE 2030 COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN AND/OR OTHER ADOPTED COUNTY PLANS
L.R. Jacobs, owners of a 9.8 acre parcel of property within Orange County, has initiated an
amendment to the Orange County Zoning Atlas, as established in Section 1.2 of the Orange
County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) to rezone property:
FROM: Economic Development Eno Lower Intensity (EDE-1), Economic
Development Eno Higher Intensity (EDE-2), Lower Eno Protected
Watershed Protection Overlay District, and Major Transportation Corridor
(MTC) Overlay District
TO: Economic Development Eno Higher Intensity (EDE-2), Lower Eno
Protected Watershed Protection Overlay District, and Major Transportation
Corridor (MTC) Overlay District
allowing for the continued development and expansion of an existing commercial facility known as
Jacobs Glass Company. The parcel, further identified utilizing Orange County Parcel Identification
Number (PIN) 0803-30-5174, is located in the southeastern quadrant of the NC 751 and US70
East/Hillsborough Road, and an address of 4915 Hillsborough Road hereafter referred to as `the
property.'
The Planning Board finds:
• The requirements of Section 2.8 of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) have been
deemed complete, and
• Pursuant to Sections 1.1.5, and 1.1.7 of the UDO and to Section 153A-341 of the North
Carolina General Statutes, the Board finds documentation within the record denoting that
the rezoning is consistent with the adopted 2030 Comprehensive Plan, the Eno EDD
Area Small Area Plan and/or other adopted County plans.
The amendment is consistent with applicable plans because it:
• Supports the following 2030 Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives including:
1. Land Use Overarching Goal: Coordination of the amount, location, pattern and
designation of future land uses, with availability of County services and facilities
sufficient to meet the needs of Orange County's population and economy
consistent with other Comprehensive Plan element goals and objectives.
2. Land Use Goal 2: Land uses that are appropriate to on-site environmental
conditions and features, and that protect natural resources, cultural resources,
and community character.
3. Objective LU-1.1: Coordinate the location of higher intensity / high density
residential and non-residential development with existing or planned locations of
public transportation, commercial and community services, and adequate
supporting infrastructure (i.e., water and sewer, high-speed internet access,
streets, and sidewalks), while avoiding areas with protected natural and cultural
resources.
4. Economic Development Goal 1: Public-private sector partnerships that create a
stronger business climate.
1
10
Objective ED-1.4: Achieve the objective of adding 5,000 new private sector jobs
in the County and $125,000,000 in new commercial property by June 2010, with
the goal of 75% of the new jobs being filled by County residents.
Objective ED-1.5: Identify barriers to development of desirable businesses and
local businesses, and mitigate these barriers.
Objective ED-1.6: Provide outreach, recognition and/or expedited service to new
and existing businesses that meet development criteria.
Objective ED-1.8: Explore policies to use in attracting and encouraging
development of companies and enterprises that will build and expand upon the
County's economic base.
5. Economic Development Goal 2: Infrastructure that supports desired
development.
Objective ED-2.5: Identify lands suitable to accommodate the expansion and
growth of commercial and industrial uses in the County.
Objective ED-2.8: Adjust ongoing designation and zoning of Economic
Development Districts to avoid the area designated as the Rural Buffer. (See
also Land Use Objectives LU-3.1 and LU-3.3.).
The amendments are reasonable and in the public interest because:
a. The amendment will foster economic development within the Eno Economic
Development District. It also encourages the balanced and sustainable growth of
existing non-residential uses.
The project will provide buffers and setbacks to transition between residential uses
and transition to natural resource areas.
b. The project will not result in traffic impacts deemed to be detrimental to existing
roadways due to the proposed density.
c. The proposed amendments promote public health, safety, and general welfare by
furthering the goals and objectives of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan.
The Planning Board hereby recommends that the Orange County Board of County
Commissioners consider adoption of the proposed Zoning Atlas amendments.
r
Pete Hallenbeck, Chair Date
11
Attachment 5
STATEMENT OF CONSISTENCY
OF PROPOSED ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENTS WITH THE 2030 COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN AND/OR OTHER ADOPTED COUNTY PLANS
L.R. Jacobs, owners of a 9.8 acre parcel of property within Orange County, has initiated an
amendment to the Orange County Zoning Atlas, as established in Section 1.2 of the Orange
County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) to rezone property:
FROM: Economic Development Eno Lower Intensity (EDE-1), Economic
Development Eno Higher Intensity (EDE-2), Lower Eno Protected
Watershed Protection Overlay District, and Major Transportation Corridor
(MTC) Overlay District
TO: Economic Development Eno Higher Intensity (EDE-2), Lower Eno
Protected Watershed Protection Overlay District, and Major Transportation
Corridor (MTC) Overlay District
allowing for the continued development and expansion of an existing commercial facility known as
Jacobs Glass Company. The parcel, further identified utilizing Orange County Parcel Identification
Number (PIN) 0803-30-5174, is located in the southeastern quadrant of the NC 751 and US70
East/Hillsborough Road, and an address of 4915 Hillsborough Road hereafter referred to as `the
property.'
The BOCC finds:
• The requirements of Section 2.8 of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) have been
deemed complete, and
• Pursuant to Sections 1.1.5, and 1.1.7 of the UDO and to Section 153A-341 of the North
Carolina General Statutes, the Board finds documentation within the record denoting that
the rezoning is consistent with the adopted 2030 Comprehensive Plan, the Eno EDD
Area Small Area Plan and/or other adopted County plans.
The amendment is consistent with applicable plans because it.
• Supports the following 2030 Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives including:
1. Land Use Overarching Goal: Coordination of the amount, location, pattern and
designation of future land uses, with availability of County services and facilities
sufficient to meet the needs of Orange County's population and economy
consistent with other Comprehensive Plan element goals and objectives.
2. Land Use Goal 2: Land uses that are appropriate to on-site environmental
conditions and features, and that protect natural resources, cultural resources,
and community character.
3. Objective LU-1.1: Coordinate the location of higher intensity / high density
residential and non-residential development with existing or planned locations of
public transportation, commercial and community services, and adequate
supporting infrastructure (i.e., water and sewer, high-speed internet access,
streets, and sidewalks), while avoiding areas with protected natural and cultural
resources.
1
12
4. Economic Development Goal 1: Public-private sector partnerships that create a
stronger business climate.
Objective ED-1.4: Achieve the objective of adding 5,000 new private sector jobs
in the County and $125,000,000 in new commercial property by June 2010, with
the goal of 75% of the new jobs being filled by County residents.
Objective ED-1.5: Identify barriers to development of desirable businesses and
local businesses, and mitigate these barriers.
Objective ED-1.6: Provide outreach, recognition and/or expedited service to new
and existing businesses that meet development criteria.
Objective ED-1.8: Explore policies to use in attracting and encouraging
development of companies and enterprises that will build and expand upon the
County's economic base.
5. Economic Development Goal 2: Infrastructure that supports desired
development.
Obiective ED-2.5: Identify lands suitable to accommodate the expansion and
growth of commercial and industrial uses in the County.
Objective ED-2.8: Adjust ongoing designation and zoning of Economic
Development Districts to avoid the area designated as the Rural Buffer. (See
also Land Use Objectives LU-3.1 and LU-3.3.).
The amendments are reasonable and in the public interest because.
a. The amendment will foster economic development within the Eno Economic
Development District. It also encourages the balanced and sustainable growth of
existing non-residential uses.
The project will provide buffers and setbacks to transition between residential uses
and transition to natural resource areas.
b. The project will not result in traffic impacts deemed to be detrimental to existing
roadways due to the proposed density.
c. The proposed amendments promote public health, safety, and general welfare by
furthering the goals and objectives of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan.
The Board of County Commissioners hereby adopts this Statement of Consistency and
findings expressed herein.
Earl McKee, Chair Date
Attachment 6 13
Ordinance#:ORD-201 5-029
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
THE ORANGE COUNTY ZONING ATLAS
WHEREAS, Orange County has received and processed a petition submitted by L.R. Jacobs
seeking to amend the Orange County Zoning Atlas, as established in Section 1.2 of the Orange County
Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), and
WHEREAS, this petition seeks to rezone a 9.8 acre parcel of property, further identified utilizing
Orange County Parcel Identification Number (PIN) 0803-30-5174, to Economic Development Eno Higher
Intensity (EDE-2), Lower Eno Protected Watershed Protection Overlay District, and Major Transportation
Corridor (MTC) Overlay District for the purpose of expanding their business known as Jacobs Glass
company.
WHEREAS, the proposal has been found to be consistent with the various plans outlining
allowable development in the area including the Eno EDD Area Small Area Plan, and
WHEREAS, the requirements of Section 2.8 of the UDO have been deemed complete, and
WHEREAS, the Board has found the proposed zoning atlas amendment to be reasonably
necessary to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Commissioners of Orange County that the Orange County
Zoning Atlas is hereby amended to rezone the 9.8 acre portion of the aforementioned parcel to
Economic Development Eno Higher Intensity (EDE-2), Lower Eno Protected Watershed Protection
Overlay District, and Major Transportation Corridor (MTC) Overlay District.
BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED THAT this ordinance be placed in the book of published ordinances
and that this ordinance is effective upon its adoption.
Upon motion of Commissioner seconded by Commissioner
, the foregoing ordinance was adopted this day of
2015.
I, Donna S. Baker, Clerk to the Board of Commissioners for Orange County, DO HEREBY
CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of so much of the proceedings of said Board at a meeting
held on , 2015 as relates in any way to the adoption of the foregoing and
that said proceedings are recorded in the minutes of the said Board.
WITNESS my hand and the seal of said County, this day of 2015.
SEAL
Clerk to the Board of Commissioners
1