Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 06-07-1978 COMPARATIVE BUDGET DATA - 1977-78 vs. 1978-79 1977-78 No. of pupils. . . . . . .4,739 X Per-pupil allocation .$ 353 $1,672,867 Appropriated Fund Sal . 137,000 Total $1,809,867 = $382 actual per-pupil 1978-79: No. of pupal 4,880 No. of pupils . . . . . 4,880 X Proposed maim level $388 X Manager's recomm. . . . $396 $1,893,440 $11932,480 Approp. Fund Sal . . 60,000 Approp. Fund Sal . 60,000 Total $1,953,440 Total $1,992,480 = 400 actua per pupil OR = 408 actual per pupil OR a 4.6 % inC ease in real dollars. a 6.8 % increase in real dollars. e��GE 'SAX RA�� f r r 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 CUMULATIVE INCREASE IN CONSUMER 'RICE INDEX VS CUMULATIVE INCREASE IN TAX RATE 4. 54 gRop�RTY TAX av 40 30 r � � 20 10 w Q 1976 19 - 7 198- 1979- SELECTED REVENUES AS PERCENT OF TOTAL .BUDGET f 8 °\a �9O t o � L g°° P118LIC WORKS- tlA�q�5 �Q�a VIC1:5,_������y Hof Q oho D PERCENT OF TOTAL BUDGET BY CATEGORY OF EXPENDITURE FY 1978 - 1979 3 R � ©j .g °0v Rlv MNTAf. EV INTER UPS_ TAXES- ABC SYSTEM! -3 % PROPERTY-49% 5 TAX' 2.0/a �N'�ANGtBL� a1jj a R f ,0; , �a -q Y 'e PERCENT OF TOTAL BUDGET BY CATEGORY OF REVENUES FY 1978-1979 3Q 41 Fg F 20 tea` [Q Q¢v 1 z -- ui M 0 1975- 1976- 1977- (978- 76 77 78 79 PERCENT OF ANNUAL. CHANGE IN SELECTED REVENUES j Jj 1 � Ch��5S10�1L'r5 Mr, Richard ward of 1'n. Orange criatY �morandu Assn start 3osepr Bradshaw Adm�n� From: June 7, 1978 Date: CETA Program Subject* asked me to summarize our findings in regard to ()range Mr. Gatti s ask its i n -F-TA programs after,ce of community DRmpl oy- county` continued efforts am including in i r advice and expertise.office We have met with officials from the Office Raleigh to seek the as learned to date, meat i� form what the county Staff' h summary the County must make a at this Fi form and most important alternatives: decision from the following services, grogram 1) Contract with Triangle J for staff a Planning operation. referred way to goy but In many localities, this would o a preferred and/or operating presently Triangle d performs no CRTA p services. 1,f one ut91"it�izes a COG, the plans are subject hesrno view by because all member governments have pre- the League of�Regional Councils (which p contract with Region viously been connected with consortiums agreement with "Remains of Consortium" (Durham County)CoG Seek agrthe locally acceptable consortium arrangement seek an o with the state• involvement) and contract directly over 50,000 population) can to establish man third party Any one unit ( It would be necessary responsibility• This approach has not been tr7e This arrange' agreement with the state office. wit would d flo _directly with a ,, date officials feelconfkden�t it would float. ��� a „rip Memorandum Tot Orange County Board of Commissioners From: Sam Gattis, County Manager Date: dune 6, 1978 Subject: Request for County Funding of Fire Marshal Office In Maya elegation representing the County Association of Fire Chiefs appeared befoe the Board and requested the County Commissioners create the office of County Fire Marshal and pay the expenses of this office from general county funds. The Board of Commissioners referred this request to the County Manager for rIcommendation. T have not included this request-in the Manager's budget this year for several reasons, a principal one being our general lack of funds. First years funding withoyt clerical assistance and including a vehicle, supplies, rent, etc. might run aro nd $24,000. This does not include funds for actual programs, if there are any Subsequent years budget would not repeat original start up costs but some sec tarial help would offset part of this. Aside from a general lack of funds othe problems arise. First, are general county funds the appropriate source for fi�ancing this activity? A fire marshal will provide no significant service to th municipalities of Chapel Hill and Carrboro as each has its paid fire departm ;t with full time personnel. Second, an appropriate mechanism exists to finance this activity already, the various special fire taxes. Third, some of the services of a fire marshal (but not many at this time) could be provided by the Comnun cation Center Director at no cost to the departments if they chose to accept the . I feel it is inappropriate to combine Civil Preparedness funding and funding of the fire RIArshal office. If combining is to be done Civil Preparedness should be joined wit the Communication Center into. an Emergency Services Department as both are tots ly county funded. At this point the source of funding for a fire marshal has n t been determined. In time I feel the County should create a Department of Emergency Services that could amgng other things coordinate efforts of the Communication Center, Emergency Medical Services, Civil Preparedness and volunteer fire. I do not propose law a forcement be involved in this department. For this year however, I feel the Co my has increased its investment in the emergency services area as much as it reasonably can.