Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 10-03-1977 AGENDA ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS t.. COMMISSIONERS ROOM, COUNTY COURTHOUSE HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA MONDAY, OCTOBER 3, .I.9 7 7 10 :00 A. M. Perso s not on this agenda having business to transact with the B and of County COMMissioners should make their presence known in order that an appropriate time for them to be heard might be arranged. ,r.2 . Minut s of the Board meeting held September 20, 1977 are submitted for consideration. Mr. Pul. Lee will petition the Board for exemption tion from Count Peddlers License requirements. (agenda Attachment I) �. 4. The M nager recommends a budget amendment to provide funds neces ary to complete the Morgan Creek Hills Participating Pavin Project be approved. (Agenda Attachment II) A Pubic Hearing to consider a Final Assessment Resolution implelen,ting the Colonial Hills Participating Paving Project has b en set at 10 :00 A.M. today. The M eager recommends adoption of the Final. Assessment Resol tion considered in the Publi Page 2 Commissioners Agenda " October 3 , 1977 10 . The Chairman and Manager will review a proposal from the Chapel Hill Housing Authority to locate their Administration Service Building on the Northsi.de School property. r11-i". Matters relating to Interstate Highway 40 a. The Chairman, will report on the proceedings of the Coalition Opposing Interstate 40. i b. Will the Board of Commissioners authori. e the County Attorney to take whatever action he feels necessary to enable orange County to oppose the locat.ion .of Interstate 40 !'f2. The Planning Staff will report activities of the various Township Planning Councils since the last meeting of the Board. t„_,k3. The Planning Staff will submit a report of subdivision and construction activity during the month of September. :14 . Some Board members have asked the Chairman to consider a third regular meeting each month. Will the Board initiate this policy? /15. Mr. James Webb, Architect for the Northside Project, will review a proposed change order relatinq to modification of windows. (Agenda Attachment III) 615. Dr. James Leutz, Chairman of the Advisory Councils of .the Durham-Orange Employment and Training Consortium, will outline the proposed program, of his group for the coming year. &1�. A hearing to allow representatives of Medical Research Properties, Inc. , tb, appeal the decision of the Tax Supervisor to tax certain properties titled in their .name. The Honorable David Rooks will represent Orange County at this hearing. 18. One vacancy exists on the County Jury Commission. ,,-1.9. The Staft will deliver a progress report on the County' s Energy Conservation Program. 20. Petitions for Rezoning - a. The J. H. H. Corporation has requested the Board reconsider rezoning of a tract on the west side of Smith Level. Road from Residential to General Commercial . (Agenda. Attachment TV} Page 3 Commissio ez5 Agenda Ictober :3, 1977 w 20. Petit ons for Rezoning - Continued b. T e Planning Board unanimously recomm R ymond ''Williams to rezone ends the request a Residential to General. Co tract can N. C, 86 from of mmercial be aPproved. AGENDA ATTACKMENJ I Peddlers G . S , 105-53 "Conditions" The Board of County commissioners may exempt from the peddler ' s license tax, upon proper application , (1) disabled veterans of the lice who Spanish-American War , and of the First and second 1Vcyrl.d Wars , p been bona fide residents of this State for twelve or more months have , ontinuous] y , and (2) the blind who have been bona fide residents C and (3 ) widows Of this State for twelve or more months continuously , with dependent children . r n ORANGE G(lUNTY -' �� ✓�� ''�� 1977--78 BUDGET ORDINANCE r ANENDiMENT The 1977-78 Budget Ordinance of Orange County as adopted on Anne 22, 1§77, and subsequently amandedl is hereby amended as follows: Change the appr priation for the following line items in the funds indicated: FUND ,. INCREASE (DECREASE) TO TOTAL General Public Work -Street Surfacing 10,102 - 40,102 Contingency (1 ,944) 138,056 Change the revers es and fund balances estimated to be available to meet the foregoing appropriations in the funds indicated: FU--ND-- RESOURCE .INCREASE (DECREASE) TO TOTAL General Special Assessments 8,158 23,158 Adopted this the 3rd --day f Y ©ctober 1977 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS TO FINANCE A PORTION OF THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COSTS OF PAVING BAYBERRY DRIVE, AZALEA DRIVE, AND AZALEA PLACE, ROADS LOCATED IN SECTION I OF MORGAN CREEK HILLS SUB- DIVISION IN CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP , ORANGE COUNTY, NOR'T'H CAROLINA Notice is hereby given that , pursuant to Article 9 of Chapter 15:3A of the General. Statutes of North Carolina, the Commis ioners for Orange County have adopted a Preliminary Assessment Resolution as follows : 1. Orange County shall undertake financing of a portion of the .local share of paving Bayberry Drive, Azalea Drive, and Azalea Place, roads located in Section I of Morgan Creek Hills Subdivision in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina. The amount to be financed by Orange County, is estima ed to be $16 ,694. 00 , including costs and attorneys fees. No portion of the costs of paving the above roads will be borne by the Department of Transportation or the State of North Carol.ii 2 . The basis for assessment for the local share of the costs of this project shall be the number of lots served, or subjec to be served, at an equal rate per lot. 3 . Orange County will assess the financed portion, of the total Ehare according to the basis set out in number 2 above which financed portion of the total local share represents approximately seventy-seven percent (77%) of the total project cost. 4. No assessments of this project will be held in abeyance. 5. The assessments shall be paid in the following manner: k with the first such installment, with i.nterest., d7 60 days after the date that the assessment role is confirmed, and the remaining installments, with interest, due on the same date in each successive year until the assessment is paid in full. A public hearing will be held at _ 8:00 o 'clock P.M. , on the .18th day of October m 19 77 , at the Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina, the regular place of meeting of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina , in order, to discuss all matters covered by the preliminary assessment resolution. County of Orange M By: _ ✓- tcard EE Whitted, Chairman Orange County Board of Commissioners (SEAL) Attest : Cl At the time and place above stated any resident of Orange County or any other interested person may appear and be heard. This the day of 19 Aga a R. Jo on, Clerk of Co issioners for Orange County, North Carolina A meeting of the Board of Commissioners for Orange County, North Carolina, was held at Hillsborough, North Carolina the regular place of meeting at 10 =00 o' clock d .m. , on Octobe 3, 19 77. Present: Commissioners Rich ard_ighItted_, _ Gusta eson, Jan Pinney, Norman Walker and Donald Willhoit Absent- None The following resolution was read to the Board : WHEREAS the Board of Transportation of the State of North Carolina has approved a route known as Alternate I--B for the e tension of Interstate 40 from I-85 west of Durham to the Research Triangle Park, which route, if followed, would result in th construction of a major new highway through Orange County and.: WHEREAS the Board of Commissioners of Orange County oppose the extension of Interstate 40 along Alternate Route 1--B and tie construction of a major new highway through Orange Count becau e, based on the infromation available to date, the Beard is of the opinion that the construction of a major new highway through Orange County is not in the best interest of the citizen of Orange County and the citizens of the State of North Carolina IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED THAT the Orange County Attorney is authorized to take whatever steps necessary, including appropriate court action in opposition to the decision of the Board of Transportation of the State of North Carolina approvinc Alter ate 1-H or any future decision of the Board of Transport- ation. or anv other Board or Aaencv . the result-of which will br Willh it seconded the motion and resolution was passed by the following vote: Ayes : Commissioners, ELilcilard hittedNorman _C,us Jain Pinney and Donald ji i Noes--Commissioner Norman Walke.t, I, Agatha R. Johnson, Clerk of the Board of Commission, for Or�nge County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a tree copy of the proceedings of said Board of Commis ioners at a meeting held on October 4 , 1977 , as such proceedings are recorded in the Minute Book. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said Board, this t e .�' day of 1977. _ Agat I�C Johnso , Clerk Boar o mmis goners for Orange � . County, North Carolina B. B OLIVE PATENT ATTOPNEY 500 HF FOR:a--SrRFEr �C)5T OFFire Box 20,39 DuRHAM,N6R-rH CAROLTNA 2T70w P.ir ENY,7R4C1EMaRn,COPY IC>aY Pg4GTeCc TELEPHONE `919)b8Z-d0;!5 October 27, 1977 688-a734 Honorable Jalles B. Hunt Governor, St to of North Carolina Raleigh, Nor .h Carolina Re: 1-40 Routing Dear Governs Hunt: The people and Officials of Orange County for I have been whom speaking. want to know whether you will or will not honor your promises for open government, enforce the law, and require the Board of Transportation to hear the Officials and citizens of Orange County concerning I-40 routing in Orange County. I again point out fo you that it i.s the Board, and not the highway engineers, wh'Leh has exclusive power under the North Carobana General Statutes to decide highway routin 's . 18, 44.1., 45 qn.d 47 and annotated cases thereunder.N.G.G.S. -136--17.2, Your attention to the fact that the Board' s own Publi.shedlregu.la- tions require the Board to keep minutes of its meetings . regu- lations do no mention and, in my opini.o-d clearly do not allow condone the keeping of a brief, composed "summar " .dealing with he handling of $84,000, 000 of public funds.meeting now stand, we in Orange County see yoi..; office as knowingly mot.ing a zmi„xe "Rosen' Wood" - "Korean" t g y Pro- North Carolina in connection with the localy1-40cissue. h We there- fore expect: a d respectfully demand action on this scandal.. o one, including the Governor, is above part. law. On the evening of September 8, 1,977, it is now known that a -High Point citizens organization entertained the Board of Transportation at a non--calle , unpublicized meeting. 1977, the Boar of On MettatOa called, pub of September 9, ing. At the beginning of this meeting and for a substantial part the time al, for this meeting, various High Point citizens were given Linr stricted time and freedom to speak to the Board in session concerning Guilford County roads. As the last it m on the agenda for the September 9 meeting and before leaving for another free meal (lunch) provided the Board hastily cancelled one agenda it mandbtookgupPthet1-40izens, item, of intere t to Orange County Officials and citizens. At this Point, two Nor Carolina Department of Transportation employees, Governor James B , Hunt Page 2 October 27, 1977. Messrs . Rose and Waters , were al.l.owed, the right to address the Board for roughly f rty-five minutes concerning local routing of 1--40. The Board the in roughly ten minutes, with one member voting "No", with one memo r abstaining, with no questioning of the engineers whatever, and with no Orange County citizen input to the Board being allowed voted in. favor of new highway Alternate I-B, paralleling existing Routes 86 and 541-n preference to Alternate 4" which would principally use existing Route 70. I and other Orange County citizens had previously requested, both orally and in writing, permission to speak to the Board at the September 9 m eti.ng and to present the interests of Orange County, Its towns, Bo rd of County Commissioners, and citizens at large. Such requests were denied in spite of the fact that I was acting under the joie t appointment of the Chairman of the Orange. County Board of co ssioners and of the Mayor of Chapel Hill. The above cir um.stanc.es constitute dishonest government in its crudest fora. Are Orange County citizens required to "purchase" a right to sp ak to the Board by offering the Board wining and dining before and after their meeting? How does this differ from pure graft? Surely, you, as Governor, have a legal, and moral responsibility not to condone such outright . di.shonesty as part of State Covernm nt. Federal and State law enforcement officials receiving cop es of this correspondence also have a duty to investi- gate this sca dal.Are Board members reporting such "income'.' for taxatioi I again remind you that $84,000,004 in Federal and State funds were involved at the September 9, 1977 meeting and public' records relating thereto were also involved. Numerous microphones were present at the September 9 , 1977 meeting, presumably for the pur- pose of providing accurate and complete minutes for public record. Yet, we now have three conflicting stories emanating from the Department of rransportation concerning keeping of the minutes of the September 9, 1977 meeting relating to the 84, 000,000 of Federal and State public monies. One story is that the recorder was there but �t broke. Another story is that, yes, there is a tape, but it will not be transcribed. A further story is that, no there is n tape and the practice of the Board is to compose a "summary' . ask, how can the public ever know what was actually- said and what ctually went on at the meeting of September 9, 1977, dealing with $ 4,000,000 of public monies. This additi.vna:l scandal relate to public records requires responsible and immediate action on your part. It also requires investigation by responsible Federal. and St to authorities . The Department of Transportation has just released a brief, composed summary of the 1-40 portion of the September 9, 1977 meeting and which is cal.le "minutes" . I have reviewed the same and fi Governor James B. "lb_mt Page 3 October 27 , 1 77 choice lay between Alternate 4 and Alternate 1-B was not recorded. The reasons w y the engineers recor.wended 1-•B were not recorded. The reason wh Member Jonas abstained was not recorded. None of the few comme is made by the Board members were recorded. The engineer' s co ent concerning the 1-85 interchange was not recorded. There was essentially no "discussion" -uhatever and yet the so--called "minutes" imply there was "discussion" in a true sense. The highway a gi.neers , among other representations, represented to the Board of I ransportation at the September 9 meeting that building of 1ternate 1-�B would eliminate the need to upgrade Route 86 be een Chapel Hill and 1--85 and would eliminate having to upgrade Route 54 between Chapel. Hill and the Research Triangle Park and represented that Alternate I-B was intended to connect I-85 and the Research Triangle Park as a local traffic corridor. Such representatio s by the .engineers, with no opportunity on the part of the public to refute such representations, represents a further reason as to why Officials and citizens of Orange County should be allowed to address the Board directly. If Route 86 and Route '54 are effectively to be abandoned, there is still a further apparent violation of law. I point out that the Board is not authorized to abandon an existing part of the highway system and construct an entirely new road in its place (see Town of Newton vs . State Highway Commission. 194 NC1.59 , 138 S.E. 601 (1927) . ) With further regard to the legislative intent that the Board shall hear citizens in highway disputes , note the following st=atement in N.C.G.S. 136-- 7 concerning how objections regarding proposed high- way routings are required to be handled by the Board: "If anv objections are made- by the board of county commissioners or county road--governing body of any county or street-governing body or the city or town, the whole matter shall be heard and determined by the Board of Transportation in session, . . ." . The proposed I-B 1-40 route has been clearly identified by the Department of Transportation as being intended to serve local, county traffic needs as well as State -traffic needs and I point 'out that the Orange Count Commissioners , the Chapel. Hill Town Board, and the Carrboro Town Board have long been on record as apposing routing of 1•-40 through Orange County. How can this law be so flagrantly ignored, both as to its letter and intent? Because of the apparent lack of sensitivity of the Governor' s Office to Ehe 1-40 issue, I also point out and reamed you that the Board has awesome powers and awesome responsibi.l.iti.es and its membership should surely reflect some degree of competence and responsibility over a broad range of environmental concerns . It would also seem desirable that, at least, one member of the Board be selected specifically because of competence in representing the low income segment of our population who so often are the most drastically Governor James 11, Hunt Page 4 October 27 , 1.9 77 impacted by hig way constructio��, The impact of Alte.:nrtthisoki.nd the Black Crest Street co= pity emphasizes the need of representation' on the Board of Transportation. The fact that the home of one of the most prominent surgeons on the Memorial. Hospital Staff stands to be wiped out by the 1.-B Alternate also exemplifies the need for competence in evaluating priorities and environmental concerns . The composition of the present Board, when looked at in the :Light of sensitivity, competence to deal with a range o environmental concerns and willingness to accept responsibility raises a 'still further and grave question requiring your immediate attention as to whether at least some of the members even belong on the Board. The Board composition is itself scandalous . Aside from everything else, citizens and Officials of Orange County have given. the North Carolina Department of Transportation numerous and substantial reasons as to why orange County officials and citizens should be allowed to address the Board itself who, as distinct from the engineers , have the decision-making authority. There are ques ions of impact on Orange County groundwater, community wells , identif ed future water impoundments , and the like, which were not b.xoug t to the Board' s attention and which were not con- sidered in the Environmental. Impact Statement. Any intelligent and responsibl Board member could be made to understand such impact which to date s been wholly ignored and is of critical. importance to orange Coun. y in its current desperate water crisis. There are questions of s condary impact of enormous consequence, to Orange County but whi h have been ignored. Nevertheless, any qualified Board member c uld be made to understand and evaluate the significance of such secon ry impacts. There are other questions of why l-B should be built to parallel existing highways to serve local traffic when e same existing highways could simply be upgraded for the same purpose. There is also the basic question as to why Alternate 1-B even needs to be built when two other routes, Alternates 3 and 4, have already been identified as highways that will be built in any event to connect 1. 85 and the Research Triangle Park, the sawn and identical purpose of Alternate I.-B. The Board was not told that the highway engineers planned to build three separate highways to serve the same purpose of connecting 185 and the Research Triangle Park . Why was this basic' and fundamental fact withheld from the Board? No facts and no donsiderati.ons whatever have been given ' in the E-nviton�ental. impact Statement and the Board was told -nothing on September 9 about energy and its future relation to the need for 1-40 and the planning of 1­40. The engineers axe thus directing the North Carolina Board' of Transportation along a path which directly conflicts with Federal policy and agions . This list could go on and on. in sum and substance, the Board has clearly and with intent been isolated from the view of the public in violation of law anal, more importantly, Governor .James B . Hunt Page 5 October 27 , 1977 in violation f the principals of good Bove-rnment . These circum- stances amount to outright scandals. Again 1 say, we expect and respectfully request action by you and by all responsible Federal. and State officials receiving copies of this correspondence . Furthermore, we want an immediate indication from you of whether the voting and tax.-paying officials and citizens of Orange County - will or will not be heard by the Board in session as required by law, justice and good government. Z further ask that you issue an immediate Executive Order c�adeiist and directing the Board, and each member there©f, from the practice of receiving gifts and favors from segments of the public and public, private and quasi.-publi.cally financed organizations such as the High Point Chamber of Commerce, whether disguised as free meals , motel accommodations , or whatever. Such practices , if continued, can lead to nothing but an established pattern of legalized andtnlerat�edobyl�youoox�anytofher'aGo-ver�.ord should not be condoned yojIr response or public statement as to all of these matters is awaited by the citizens and officials of Orange County, Chapel. Hill and Car born. Respectfu ly P-115 s,, B. Oliv Coordinator or Opposition to i--40 in 0 ange County, Joint Appoint ent by the Chairman, Or ge County Board of Co i.ssioners and Mayor, Town of Chapel Hill Governor James 'B , Hunt- P age 6 October 2-7 , 1.9 77 Copies mailed to the following: 11"h0m.as W, Bra shaw, Jr. , Secretary, North Carolina Department of Transportat .in Brock Adams , Secretary, Department of Transportation, United States, T . J. Morawsk� , Division Administrator, Federal fl�ighway Administration T . Bell , Attorney General , United States of America George M. And rson., United States Attorney, Ral.ei h a Rufus Edmiste , Attorney General, State of North olin McNeill Smith Jr. , Senator, State of North Carolina Willis P . `,dhi hard, Senator, State of North Carolina Henry Frye, Representative, state of North Carolina Richard Erwin, Representative, State of North Carolina Howard Lee, S cretary, N. C. Department of Natural and Economic Resourc Ben Ruffin, S cretary, Human Relations Commission J. Wallace, 4hyOr, Town. of Chapel. Hill, North Carolina Richard Whitt d, Chairman, Orange County. Board of Commissioners Ruth West, Mayor, Town of Carrboro , North Carolina A. B. Coleman, Jr. , Attorney for Orange County Emery B. Den Jr. , Attorney for Town. of Chapel Hill. Michael Brog , Attorney for Town of Carrboro Hugh Wilson, Chairman, Democratic Warty in orange County Ernie Carl, Chairman, Republican. Warty in Orange County W. E . Knight, Director, Division of Environmental Manageinent North Carolina Department of Natural and Economic Resources John Wray, H ad, North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and CommurEi y Development Joseph Stral y, Chairman, Piedmont Crescent Energy Gauncil Ray Green., E ecutive Director of Region of North Carolina Law School Professor Thomas Schoenbaum, University Director, Internal Revenue Service, Washington, D. C. Director, North Carolina Department of Revenue, Raleigh, North Carolir Ervin Dobson, Director of Planning, Orange County Professor Fr 2d White, Director of Duke Forest Professor Duacan Heron, Chairman, Duke committee of Environmental Concerns Dr. Robert B n.ar, Chairman, Orange County Planning Board firs . Joan Carl, Representative, League of Women Voters THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA ^T CHAPEL H3__. SCIiL3nL OF I_A[V I'he University of North Caro%=-it Chnncl Hill Van IfeckeAVetfach Na!t rl54 s "oveiibew 1, 1977 C`h:ipci Hilt.North Ca5c!7°a:'-�'4 Mr. J. Willi m Blue, Jr. Suite 20, Fr nklin Building 157 E. Franklin Street Chapel Bill, N. C. 27514 Dear Bill.: Receipt of B.B. Olive's October 27, 1977 letter to Governor Hunt has prompted me to think about the fact that our legal efforts - researching legal theories of possible causes of action (state and federal) and our agreements with experts for their. [mitten reports - should be di ecLed toward specific purposes. First, I, am not hopeful that there is a chance to change the 1-40 decisiom by trying to influence state officials, despite B.B. 's letter. Whi e B.13. 's efforts and those of tethers trying to influence state offici is will continue, I feel c:e should start planning for making a str if ng appeal at the level, of the Federal DOT. The timetable for the FITS ally for application for federal Location approval and publication the final, ETS in February or March, 7978. Our immediate effort should be directed to getting our act together to go to Washington. We should have written reports from (1) Carl., (2) Straley or someone else on energy, (3) I:aiser and (4) Morris. We should them - about April arrange to take a high level delegation up to Washington armed with r ports and our experts and make an appeal to U.S. DOT, the Council on Environmental Quaiity� and the Department of Energy. If this fails and if the federal DOT gives location approval, our only alterna ive [.gill be to go to court. Please et me know if you see any problems with this or see other possible cou ses of action. I think it important that we all agree on where we are headed. Thanks. Best re ands, Very truly yours, Thomas T. Schoenbaum TJSfmw ORANGE COUT Hrt.LSBO R©UGH NDRT,a CAR01IYA 27278 °Ygea �°'•r 4 4r ]7 ,� J Rr�h L1i°07 Memo to: Boa O.f County romraissio�LZrs From. planning Department Date: 0 tuber 3, 1977 Subject- Advisory Councils Progress Report September 8 - At the second meeting in Eno TO'- hip, Council members were nominated through a bang process. 0- the forty-five (45) names nominated, twenty-four (24) Council members were elected for the Plann�g B ax`e's approval. In addition to the balloting process, a slide show on land classification was shown and a community problem identification checklist was distributed. In regards to the Eno meeting in general., the attendance was unusually large is c mparison to the other townships. (7- is estimated that there were at least 90 citizens in attendance) . September 3 - Cheeks To-=ship Advisory' Counciri also met for the second ti e. The appo rated A�sory Council in Cheep officially elected a Wil.lian Dorsett as Chairman, Frank �4i.3-.er as airmaa, a thBill (2 j3) Lessig as Secretary. it was also officially decided that of the Council would constitute a quorzum. The fanning Staff's duties included the slide show on land classification and distr bution. of community problem i.denti rication checklist axed other materials. (Attendance - 20) e fourth meetg in B3�a`�' �wushi p, the Council, geptembe lath_ . .-._— n y vas elected as Chairman, officiagr elected its offices. Lindsay Tapp Staff was elected to ,jimmy Fou t as vice-chai.rma.n, and the Planning tannin tools assist wi h secretarial duties. Subdivision, regulations and p g were discussed. in regards to the subdivision regulations, several citizens delineate some discrepancies in the regulations that conflicted with or rate law, A proposal was made to revise the regulations as they excluded ns from all Advisory Councils were solicited. stand, after suggestio (Attenda ce - 25) September 20 Cedar Grove Township held its first with twenty people in attendance. Several mEmbers of the Planning Soar; -xe_re present to give explanations I and answer questions regarding the pur-_-,)o�as of the Advisory Councils. The communities in the township were ident=IJ_Ed to insure full I representati?n. Presently there are twenty-nine (29) on the Cedar Grave Adviso 7 Council list for the Planning Board's a?-pyaval. 0 September 22 - 'The procedure for the first meeting in all townships was also used for Little Riser. The role of the Advisory Counc2_1 was discussed and communities ithin the towaship e identi0ed. Iaere were twenty-six CU4 people in atLendance and fifteeAfames wete-m[otkinated to serve on the Little River- Towns lip Advisory Council. September 26 - The first meeting in Chap�l Hill Townshlp narkti,,d the final. Councils. Again, t-za fi=st meeting procedure formulation of the seven Advisory C 0 was used. T ere were seventeen (17) people in attend.--ce and thirty-six (36) names were ominated for the Advisory Council, Meetings for October: October 6 Hillsboraugh Township - second meeting October 11 Cheeks Township - third meeting October 13 Eno Township third meeting October 18 Cedar Grove second meeting October 20 Bingham Township - fifth meeting October 24 Chapel Hill Township second meeting October 27 Little River ToTwaship second meeti:a=-,_ September 1977 Subdivisioas Chapel Hill Towne hip Mr. Farling Heirs 1 lot Pine Knob 23 lots Tommy Brinn 34 acres Tommy Brinn 214 Acres Eillsborough To ship Jerry Lee Ha:rison 1 lot Farlow 1 lot Little River To ship Worth Lutz l lot Cedar Grove Town hip Chester Pool 22.976 acres Chester Pool 1 tract Maude Liner state 8 lots 3ingbam Township Cane Creek 14 lots Equatri.an Fa s 18 lots Eno Township Warren Gates 3 Lots Total lots 130 Total ac. (approx) 130 op 12 1 4 Pz 5F7 LOON -f E I re SO 7AP 13 j I Fw i A -; �� � i3 i I II � i I � s : ( i � � 1 ,, it/, f f 1 ; I , I � � I iii .E, - , ! £ I � , �, � � � � I es[zlts of 'Eno 'Twp. Advisory Council Bal.lotting IVe1ri1E Votes C,omIRa ity Glen Auman 55 Lawrence Road Jo Barbour 50 Lawrence Road 49 University Station Nell. Andrews h l. R � 48 Murphy School Robert jdinecol: Wallace Bacon 47 St. Mary' s 45 St. Mary's Douglas Crabtree Ted S�Sartin �� St. Mary's J. G. Flowers 42 Sena Dupree Smith 42 St. rSary`s David sang 42 Pleasant Green Mike Woods 41 New Sharon W. J. Miller 39 Pleasant Green EuauTle Wilson 39 Pleasant Green Mrs. T3illie Martin 38 Brigadoon Curtis Bane 35 University Station Cur Cur Hopper 35 St�rayhorn Hills Jim Road Petty 35 Lawrence Rna Larry Fall. 30 New Sharon R. P. Jacobs 30 Pleasant Green Wesley Simmons 28 Pleasant Green William McBroom 27 University Station Harold Surimey 25 Schley George Whitted 25 Miller Road Zeb 'Terry 24 New Sharon Gale Hill. 23 Brigadoon W. H. Jones 23 Eno Odis Johnson 23 Poplar Ridge Sharlene Pilkey 22 Seven Springs Sam Bass 22 Pleasant Green Flo Garrett 21 Seven Springs Earl Woods 21 Miller Road Joan Magot 20 Pleasant Green Sion Dowdee 20 Brigadoon Elizabeth Lee (Rodgers) 19 Lawrence Road Alexander Davison 18 St. Mary's David Williamson 1 St" Mary's Glen Martin 14 4 Brigadoon Gladys Glenn 8 Brigadoon Gene Curtis 7 �'i-ney Grove Willie Clayton 5 University Station Bill Hi ll 3 , 3 St. Mary s Ruby Martin Joe Berini 1 ? St. Mary's Henry Walker 1.. Libby Martin 1 ? Eno Township Advisory Council Name Communit Mailing; Address Nell Andrews University Station Route 1, Durham. Glen Auman Lawrence Road Route 3, Hillsborough Wallace Bacon St. Mary's Route 1, If Curtis Bane University Station Route 2, Durham Jo Barbour Lawrence Road Route 4, Hillsborough Jane Bass Pleasant Green Route 2, Durham Gene Conti Piney Grove Route 4, Hillsborough 's Route St. Max .1, of Douglas Cra'btre �` J. G. FLowers Eno Route 1, Durham Larry Hall New Sharon Route 1, Hillsborough Jim Hopper Strayhorn ,Hills Box 607, Hillsborough R. P. Jacobs Pleasant Green Route 2, Durham David Lang Pleasant Green Route 2, IT William McBroom University Station Route 4, Hillsborough Ted Martin St. Mary's Route 1, " Mrs. Willie Martin. Brigadoon Route 2, Durham W. J. Miller Plesant Green. It Gilbert Petty Lawrence Road Route 4, Hillsborough Sharlene Pilkey Seven Springs Route 4, ►► Dupree Smith St. Mary's It Eugene Wilson Plesant Green Route 2,Durham Robert Winecoff Murphy School, Route 1, ►► Earl Woods Miller Road Route 1, Hillsborough Make Woods New Sharon Route 1, " Chi et_s Tmrnshkp Advisory Council Members Azea Address ]�Obby Cobb Boy, 89, Mebane ,,oute 2, , y Co,)eland P,oute 1, Efland liar Dorsett Ef laad Sam English 20,Dby -ief f ner Efland Route 1, Efland U-sha '::.ale Efland Efland, Cecil -.Kimrey Efland Route 1, Efland Route 5:, Box 382, Mebane Bill Lessig, David Li-aer Ef Land Efland Bea Lloyd Ef land Efland P',jillip Nace Efland Efland Labannon Churen Road, Rt- 5, %let Potent 'Robert Riley Route 1, Boy. 22, Efland p,oute 2, Hillsborough Se-aber Route 2, Ifebane "T.. Scott av l-d Shaaklin Leba-a'aOn Church Road, Mebane D David T. Squires Route 2, Box 70, Mebane Heary Webster Route 2 Ilebane -Z) Ij Advisory Council List Bingham Township -tee Address ,;ohnson, Ed Route 3, Hillsborough ;_irk, Bobby Route 3, Hillsborough ouner, Forrest- Route 1, Box 81, Effland _=arl, Robert, Sr- Route 1, Box 84A, Efland 7ritchard, James Route 5, Chapel Hill Sykes, G. p, Route 3, Hillsborough Faust, Jimmy Route 2, Box 250 Mebane :;Dods, Runyan Route 1, Box 921, irfland -app, Lindsay Route 1, Efland .=ardy, Nancy Route 2, Box 331, Mebaae _eer, Evelyn Route 1, Chapel. Hill '_leayd, Clayton Route 2, Box 312, Mebane ?atterson, Quentin Route 3, Box 104, Hillsborough ©hrson, Felton Route 3, Box 111 Hillsborough ,utter, Robe t Route 3, Hillsborough 5aipes, Charles Route 3, Hillsborough Cedar Grove Township Advisory Couacil_ `"ame Community Hail -ng Address Dwight Compton Village Park ncute 1, Cedar Grove Goy Compton, Jr. Pope's Store ovate 1, '' Glen Caruthers, J . Villines Store azate 2, Hillsborough Claude Corbett Carr Route 1, Cedar Grave Lee Crabtree Schley Route 1, Hurdle Mills Merritt Dixon Lin.ch Store Route 3, Mebane Larry Coleman Schley 'cute 1, Hurdle Mulls I..arry Rogers Carr �zuto 5, Mebane Robert Greer Walnut Grove aaute 1, Hurdle Mills Robert Nichols, Jo Pope's Store ?oute 2, Hillsborough Linwood. S. Hollow y Pope's Store Route 1, Cedar Grove Charlie Langston Village Park C. B. Pope, Jr. Pope's Store William. C. Ray Villines Store Route 2, Hillsborough Mrs. Hettis VauHo k " Route 1, Cedar Grove Othar Thompson, Q. It Route 2, Hillsborough Curtis Oakley Village Park Rcutel, Cedar Grove William D. Latta Schley Route 1, Hurdle Mills Lucy Li,ggins Carr Route 1, Cedar Grove Charles Woods Schley Route 1, Hurdle Mills George Thompson Carr Saute 1, Cedar Grove C. T. Roberts Corbett TI Lindsey Woods Schley ?cute 1, Hurdle Mills Bill Lincb Linch Store Route 5, Mebane Henry Oakley Prospect Bill Route 1, Cedar Grove Henry ,Tones Villines Store Route 2, Hillsborough Mzs. James Brads er if t Earl. Stanfield Schley Route 1, Hurdle Mills Catherine McDade Village Park Route 1, Cedar Grove !. f Little River Township Name Community Mailing Address Earl McKee Caldwell. Route 2, Rougemont Richard Roberts Underwood Route 1, Hillsborough Irvin. Robinson J,V, New Bethel Route 2, Rougemont Cj V -BsrT s-6r �e Janice Mall New Bethel. Ira Thomas '.-Ullei Caldwell. Shirley James Little River Route 1, Hurdle Mills wesley Bradford Caldwell Route 2, Rougemont Bill Miller Schley Route 1, Hurdle Mills John Thomas Walk Er Farris Crossroads Route 2, Rougemont Earl Sanders Berry's Grove }, C. B. Nichols Schley Route 1, Hurdle Mills J. B. Mangum New Bethel Route 2, Rougemont Jimmy Hamlin Caldwell 11 Larry Johnson New Bethel " Edward Hicks Caldwell '� OWNER Eq c R D E€r, CONTRACTOR ❑ _-------� - 4 .AlA UOCUA'fENT G701 01HER PROJECT: No. NC-ME-3b CIIA(JGE ORDER NL)�ViEsER: One (1) (name, addrt:ss) Center for Orange-Person-Chatham Mental Health Program, Chapel Hill, N. C. TO (Contractor) f—Triad Inc. ARCHITECT'S PROJECT' NO; P.O. Box 1,905 Durham, N. C. 27702 CONTRACT FOR: General Construction �_. �j CONTRACT DATE.Ist day of September, 1 You are directed to rna .., the follo%ving changes in this Contract: Include Alternate�G-3 as Oriainally Bid, Jul 12 7 July 19 7 and for the sum of $12,800.00 As shown in Drawings, sheet No. Alt G-3-1, dated 4/15/77, entitled Alter to G=3, Re lacement of Sash - Clinic and specified under Contract Specifications, Part 11, Div. 0190.8 and 0850.10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15, entitled "Thermal Barrier Aluminum Re lacement Sash" The oriQi:tal Contract Sum was $ 203,1QO.Q0 � Net change by previous Ch Change Carders . . . . . . None 'The Contract sure prior to t•ia Change Order was . . , . . . , _ . . . _ $ Zt)3,100,QO The Contract Siren will be ,ncreaseci (decreased) (unchanged) by this Change Order. . . $ 12,800.00 The new Contract Sum ind ding this Change order will be . . . . . The Contract Time will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by $ 215,90U.QQ The Date of Completion as f the date of this Change order therefore is 216 consecutive calendar days ) ©ays a;tear. Mon. September 19, 1977 or Mon. April 17, 1978 James M. Webb, AIA, AIP Triad Inc. ARCHITECT —� -----~ ' Orange County Board of Cox 201 E, Rosetaa�}�-► St r�:�( �,���� 1905 o%v�t:Rtmissioners -- Address ox — -ChapzL A Tess ]1._2I.�,�.�Z .14 C. 27702 _ 2727 BY ,+ BY T}ATL D E ,,. Z!� — BATE /�1 I-/_/�— AAA DOCUMENT Gift CIJANe, ORDER Af RIL 197p ; );j fC),N AJAO� AMERICAN 1N51'111ME OF AKC1117 C;IS,1735 NEW YORK AVE,., N11',"'-'A""NGTON,I D C..•20(hlr- ONE 1'Ar:1 OWNER CHANGE ARC[III ECG K COyTRACI c� G R G c FIELD rAtA DC)CUMENT G70 - �.._ -- - - - Cl iANGE ORDER NUNABER: One (I) PY,OJCCT: No. NG-MR 36 (name, address) Centre f or OchapelPHilll, Nhathatn Mental Health Pr gram, TO (Contractor) ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO. Tri.a , Inc. P.O. Box 1905 CONTRACT FOR.: General Construction Durh , N. C. 27702 J CONTRACT UATE:Ist day of September, L {{ r You are directed to nt r:t t[1e `O IC1�sling cl anves in this Contract: ,erna -3 as Ori ina] 1 Bid, July 12, 1977 and for the sum o $12,800-00 Inelud As sh xr:n in Drawings, sheet No. Alt G-3-1, dated 4/15177, entitled Alter ate G'-3, Replacement 01; a-5h - Clinic and specified under Gnntr act Sificatians, Part II, Div. 0190.8 and 0850.I0, 11, 12, 13, 14 a d 1.5, entitled "Therrua1 Barrier Aluminum Replacement Sash" W..._ �. $ 203,100.00 The original Contract Sum vas . .. . . . , . . . ' ' . $ None Net change by previo s Change Orders . . . $ 203,100.00 The Contract Sum pri- r to t11i, c!,ange Order was . The Contract Sure wi i be incre?.secli (decreased) (unchanged) by this Change Order .$ 215,9(}0.{}p The new Contract Su including this Change Order will be . • , - ° ( The Contract Time will be (increased) (decreased) (un_ clianred) by 210 consecutive calendar days ore The Date of Cornpleti�n as of the date of this Change Order thCref 197$ after Mon. Sep ember 19, 1.977 or Mon. April Orange Country Board r Triad, Inc. � _, James M. Webb, AIA,- AIP ♦ 1;n �C71 M�^ QtVi 1 RRti55a orter5 A C:HITECT T.+ Fax 1905_ l-,stsd U,--N, r- 01 R. R©semaz�y$ � ..- Address Ad ress Address G_ 27702 . 27278 _ _ Durham - 27514 -- C By .. DATE ?T t) 7E G?1,1 v 7 — —�' .. C c�� r rr Ni no AIA DOCUMENT ' CIIAN(11 UKDER ci:6 Er)JIO` r •?rnt11f AGENDA ATTACMENL I I I J A M E S M . W rZ B R , A . i . A . - A . 1 . P . A p C H 1 T E C T & P L A N N E R h5EMBER AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS AND AMERICAN INSTITUTE of MANNERS 201 EAST ROSEMARY 5T. September 26, 1977 CHAPEL HILL, N. C. 2751A T E L E P H 0 N E 9 2 9 5 3 8 5 Mr S. M. Gattis Orange County Manager Re: Project No. IBC-MH-36 Hillsborough, N. C. 27278 Center for orange-Person-Chatham Mental Health Program, Chapel Hill, N. Dear Mr Gattis: This letter. is written to recommend for consideration by yofun d t e County as Commissioner's at your earliest convenience of approval r . t ,.ands not included under bid as Alternate G-3 Chan�,e Order �'o. � of the replacement sash, previously the General Contract but, because of insuffi,cien > recently let to Triad, General. Contractor, for construction of the pPC Mental Health Center. As you may recall the County Commissioners during the early stages of Design Development expressed a strong interest in considering all. possible energy saving measures. As a consequence l was instructed to have ouro consulting be in- mechanical engineers evaluate all practicable measures that might echanical into this building. of these measures turn of the most important corporated involved the treatment of the exterior window areas. The existin; windows are single glazed commercial type steel sash, all of which have had the glass broken out of them. The present contract calls for re,�glazi.ng these with single pane glass and making whatever repairs may be necessary for proper operation. Only single pane glazing p since insulating glass would be too thick to fit the old frames. However, "Cool Shade" screens to deflect the rec a bleuenergyrsavinghfor summeracool- been, provided, thus effecting pp ing loads. The design. capacity of the cooling system is based an this re- duced load. However, this does noCNin , for n spiteio€ winter cold have and consequent meat loss. The heating system, in spite sufficient capacity to heat the building adquately with the old windows since it' i.s essentially the original heating system, improved and re-used. The proposed change order provides for the removal of all the. old steel. sash and the installation of high quality insulating aluminum sash. Not only the glazing of insulating glass (tiro thicknesses with air space ial construction between) but also the frames in contrast t to spe exist sting steel sash which an efective thermal barrier o osed windows not only do not provide such a barrier. Thus, these pr' P } AGENDA ATTACHMENT 111 '2 September- 26, 197_ Mr S. M. Gatti.s provide efficient insulation for winter heating but. also are significantly more effective than the existing steel sash against heat gain in the summer, thereby providing; an added reduction to the cooling load over that of the "Cool. Shade" screens alone, Based on calculations by our engineering consultants Y am informed that the replacement of the existing windows with the proposed insulating win- dows together with the "Cool Shade" screens already in the contract will give an expected total reduction in annual average energy demand of some 15„18 With only the present sash re-glazed and the "cool Shade!' screens as provided under the present contract, fuel and energy savings could be expected to be an the order of 1/3 the above figure or a 5-6% saving. The Contractor has given me verbal confirmation which he expects to back up with a written confirmation immediately, that his original. bid proposal. under Alternate C-3 offered July 12, 1977, would still be valid if accepted at this time or within a reasonably short period (say the next 2 or 3 weeks or so). lie is also urging prompt consideration so these windows can be placed on order and delivery can be made without holding up the entire job. The total cost for this substitution is as follows: Original. bid Alternate C-3 per bid tabulation, 7/12/77 $12,800.00 1,216.00 Architect' s Fee C 9.5% $14 016_00 ' Fatal, Cost Ve truly .yours, James .11. Webb JK4:h C;011f-� /Z °3 Durham-oran e Employment and Training Program Summary of xojected Activities October 1., 177 to September 30,1978 The Durham--Orange Employment and Training Program plans to serve 1, 014 persons in Title I Activities during the fiscal year that began October 1 . The cost will be $1,299, 698. This incltdes $1 , 228,168 in a new allocation from Title I of the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act and $71, 530 in funds being carried over from the fiscal year just ended. As has been our custom in the past, approximately 30 per cent of the fund will be spent on participants who will come from Orange County and 0 per cent of the money will go to participants who re- side in Dur am County. The .se vices we provide are all aimed at one positive result-- to make the individual with whom we work more employable. our aim is to assist as many persons as possible to gain skills , work ex- perience, w rk attitudes and habits that will make it possible for them to move successfully and permanently into jobs that provide economic self-sufficiency. Now how do we accomplish these goals? We start in the high schools with economically disadvantaged youngsters age 14 and over who are in danger of dropping out be- cause of the economic pressure on their families . These youngsters attend regular public school classes and work for various public or non-profit agencies for an average of 12 hours a week. They are paid the minimum wage, now $2. 30 an hour, and receive fringe benefits of social security and workmen ' s compensation. The Program will operate 32 w eks this year. Today (October 3) is the first day of the first of those 32 weeks. An average youngster will earn $27. 60 per week. The total cost for 140 youngsters is $1:32 ,034 . Vocational Classroom training in regular curriculum courses at Durham Techn " cal, Institute will be provided to 313 persons for a total. 404 quarters during the year. Training areas range from licensed Practical nursing, respiratory therapy, and pharmacist assistant, t? automotive mechanics , machinist, stenography, police science, keyp� unchi_ng and accounting. We pay tuition and book costs and participants receive the minimum wage for hours of class attend- ance. The c t st of serving these 313 persons will be $313,202 . We plan to serve 140 persons in Human Resource Development Classes where there is both motivational and job-seeking training and instruction toward obtaining a high school diploma . The cost will be $102 , 573. We plan to serve 376 persons in Job Preparation Courses where there is special emphasis on job-seeking and retaining skills and personal motivation. Many of these persons will be in the first (2) phase of se vice and will receive aptitude and other tests to aid them and us in selecting appropriate areas of further c.lasa- room Or on-the-job training. The cost will be $82 .752. In an dult basic education class - continued from Fiscal, 1.977 , we wi 1 continue to serve 20 persons , and the cost will be $25 ,064. Altoge her, with 313 persons in regular curriculum classes , 1.40 i in Human Re ource Development, 376 in Job Preparation and 20 in Adult Basic Educaion, that is a total of 849 persons who will receive a service frov our program through the facilities of Durham Technical Institute. The total cost will be' $523, 291.. Let it be added here, that whale we are talking about classes organized at our, request for our participants by Durham Tech. , many classes are held off campus. Last year we held gasses at Lyon Park School and at Few Gardens in Durham. Classes were also held in Chapel. Hill and Hillsborough. We plan to continue this effort of Placing skill, learning opportunities directly to unskilled persons during Fiscal 1978. In on-the-job training in the private sector, we plan to serve 104 persons at a cost of $163 , 279 and in the public sector, 97 Person's at a cost of $336, 832. That is a total of 201 persons in on-the-job t wining at a cost of $500,111. in ad.di ion to the high school students mentioned earlier who receive work experience, we also provide a maximum, of 13 weeks of work experience for those who are not placed elsewhere after completing the .Human Resource Development Course. We plan this far 70 Persons at a cast of $68,902. Our budget can be broken down another way, of the total of $1,299, 698 w will spend to serve 1,014 persons in Title 1, $953, 81.6 or 73.4 per cent will go directly into the pockets of participants in the form cf wages or learning allowances; another $75, 060 or 5.8 per cent wil. be spent on direct services to participants such as health examinations or transportation assistance.. Of the remaining $270, 822, a total of $174, 099 or 13. 4 per cent will be spent on ser- vices to Participants primarily to provide a high level of counseling, and $96, 723 or 7. 4 personal per cent will spent on administra- tion which, in addition to salaries, includes such fixed items as rent, telephone, and postage costs. When the year is over, we expect 358 persons who have gone through the program to be gainfully employed and :3 self-sustaining. That is 35. per cent. We expect another 295 persons or 29. 5 per cent to have had other positive completions which include returning to school or ioi„ning the military. We expect 141 persons or 13. 9 Per cent to h ve had unsuccessful experiences in our program and we project 21 or 21. 3 per. cent to be enrolled n on- own that will con linue to completion during Fiscal. 1979 . g g Programs ( 3) By comparison, for the period of October 1 , 1976 to June 30, 1977, the Title I training program served 783 persons . Please notice thesi axe three quarter figures , not the full year. Pre- liminary inLoations show that approximately 975 individuals re- ceived some service from the basic training program by September 30. One-ha f of the 975 will still be in training on September 30,1977. They are scheduled to complete their training after October 1, 1 77. Those 783 individuals , who were served, received training th ough a variety of activities which include classroom vocational raining at Durham Technical Institute, on-the-job skill training wih private and public employers , part-time after school jobs for hi h school youth, high school equivalency training for school drop�uts, job experience for new entrants into the labor force and unskilled persons, vocational exploration for economi- cally disad antaged high school youth, and training of the unem- ployed and economically disadvantaged on how to find a job and retain a jo . In the Classrooms, Vocational training activity, the program served 284 persons in curriculums such as practical nurse education, respiratory therapy, auto mechanics , keypunching, and secretarial, skills . Another 155 persons received actual on-the- job training i with public and private employers (78 persons with public employers and 77 with private employers) . Part-time jobs for 132 high school youths provided job experience and the oppor•- tonity to leaxn good work habits . The training program provided 103 persons, who had less than a high school education, with the opportunity to complete the high school equivalency and improve their chances of finding work. Job Preparation classes for 40 persons focused on learning job-seeking skills and job-zetaini.ng skills. Job experience and vocational exploration training went to 80 persons who lacked skills and lacked actual. experience in a job. To offer these training opportunities , the program expended $875 , 826 from October 1 , 1976 to June 30,1977. Title III funds for the 1977 Summer Youth Employment program provided jobs to 794 economically disadvantaged youths. Expendi- tures in this program amounted to $526,024 . Additionally, the Title I trai ing program provided summer jobs to another 130 young- sters. In a 1, the summer youth employment program expanded $609, 896 on 924 young tern between the ages of 14 and 21. Another 248 unemployed persons were served in the public service jobs program between October 1, 1976 to June 30, 1977. Expenditures on behalf of these persons totaled $993, 580. These 2 8 persons were employed through 150 Public Service Employment positions . For Fiscal. year 1978, the Durham-orange program will fund 267 positions. Sixty-seven positions are for Orange Count residents , one hundred-seventy positions are for City of Durh m residents , and thirty positions are for the resi- dents of the Balance of Durham County. Under the President' s Economic Stimulus Program, the Public Service Jobs Program of 267 positions ha a funding level of more than $2. 6 million. As you axe aware , t ese positions provide important public services such NNEEM (4) as the Fix-it program fox Senior citizens, winterization of homes , artists in the public schools, renovating the Cedar Grove school in orange C unty, building recreational parks in Chapel, Hill., in- stalling se er Lines in Hillsborough, buildi„rg picnic tables for City of Duri.am parks, a health counseling service for the elderly, a, remedial reading program at Durham Technical Institute , and the School. Bus arage project for Durham County, RESOLD ION CONCERNING LOCAL SIGNIFICANCE OF DUKE FOREST WHEREAS several divisions of the Duke Forest, which i owned and managed by Duke University for the benefit of the eneral publiciare located in orange County, North Carolin ; and WHEREAS the lands and waters of the aforesaid diVisions of Doke Forest are used by citizens of Orange County, the Stata of North Carolina and the United States for education, research, recreation, and the observation of nature and wildlife; and WHEREAS the lands and waters of those aforesaid divisior of the Duke Forest are .irreplaceable natural areas which preserve the flora and fauna native to Orange County and the North Carolina Piedmont. IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissione of Orang County that such portions of Duke Forrest that are within O ange County are recreational and wildlife areas of local significance as well as natural History sites of local significance and importance. AGENDA ATTACHMENT IV OWA SA ORANGE WATER and SEW F-P. AUTHORITP, P..O,B"356]Csrrbom,North Carc lire: 275 1 U August 30, 1977 Mr. Fred Hazard 119 North Col mbia Street Chapel Hill , orth Carolina 27514 Re: Request for Sewer Service Proposed Southern Professional Center Dear Mr. Haza We have viewed your request for sewer service for the proposed Professional Center in Oran]e County off U. S. 15-501 near its intersection with Smith Level Road south of arrboro. The estimated wastewater discharge of 5,000 gallons per day for the fi -st phase of the Center and a discharge of 15,000 gallons per day within three t five years is in line with the volume of wastewater generated by this type development. This initial 5,000 gallons per day can be accepted into the Orange dater and Sewer Auth rity collection system with an extension of the Heritage Hills gravity system by the developer. Any discharge in excess of 5,000 CPD would have to be evaluatel to determine the remaining capacity of the heritage Hills lift station. Presently, under the Sewer Allocation Policy, sewer capacity (5,000 gallons) will a available in either 1978 or 1979 assuming that all of the re- quirements pursuant to the Allocation Policy are met. Also, the allocations are assigned on a First cone, first serve basis, therefore, it is necessary that all requirements WASH, local , county and state) be resolved at an early date in order to assur the developer of an allocation in either 1978 or 1979. If l can ie of further service, please advise. Sincerely, Wayne Munden Chief Engineer cc: Suellen B aul 'eu Eddie Kir Ronald Wi liamson June Sib? y /bpe � �v A meeting of the Hoard of Commissioners of Orange County, i North Carolina, was held at Hillsborough, North Carolina, the 4 regular place of meeting at 10:00 o'clock A M. , on the 3rd day of October , 19 77 , Present: Commissioners Richard.- Whit act. Norm Gustaveson Jan Pinnev, Norman Walker and Dona ld. [!i1.1h i Absent: None The following resolution was read to the Board: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION FOR THE FINANCING BY ORANGE COUNTY OF A PORTION OF THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COSTS OF PAVING BAYBERRY DRIVE, AZALEA DRI'V'E, AND AZALEA PLACE, ROADS LOCATED IN SECTION I OF MORGAN CREEK HILLS SUBDIVISION, IN CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA WHEREAS the Board of County Commissioners of Orange County has received a petition requesting the paving of Bayberry Drive, Azalea Drive, and Azalea Place, roads in Section I of Morgan Creek Hills Subdivision, in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina, which petition has been signed by at least seventy--five percent (75%) of the owners of property adjoining the said roads, which property represents at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the lineal feet of frontage of the lands abutting the said road[s] , Bayberry Drive, Azalea Drive, and Azalea Place, pursuant to North Carolina General Statute 9153A-205(c) ; and WHEREAS the Board of County Commissioners of Orange County has elected to finance a portipn of the local share of the costs of paving the said road[s] , as permitted by North Carolina General Statute 9153A--195 (4) and as provided for in North Carolina General Statute §153A-205 b; IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED THAT: 1. Orange County shall undertake financing of a portion WINSTON.C""""' a6ERNHOLi of the local share of paving Bayberry Drive, Azalea Drive, an ATTORNEYS AT L NV CHAPLL HILL,a C. Azalea Place, roads located in Section I of Morgan Creek Hills Subdivision in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina. The amount to be financed by Orange County, is estimated to be $16,694.00, including costs and attorneys fees. No portion of the costs of paving the above roads will be borne by the Department of Transportation or the State of North Carolina. 2. The basis for assessment for the local share of the costs of this project shall be the number of lots served, or subject to be served, at an equal rate per lot. 3. OrangeyCounty will assess the financed portion of the total local share according to the basis set out in number 2 above which financed portion of the total local share represents approximately seventy--seven percent (77U of the total project cost. 4. No assessments of this project will be held in abeyance. 5. The assessments shall be paid in the following manner: a. Within thirty (30) days after the notice of confirmation of the assessmen- role is published, each owner of the property may pay his assessment in full. b. Any assessment not paid in full as provided above shall be paid in 5 equal annual installments with the first such installment, with interest, due 60 days after the date that the assessment role is confirmed, and the remaining installments, with interest, due on the same date in each successive year until the assessment is paid I in full. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that a public hearing on all matters covered by this preliminary assessment resolution will be held on the 18th day of October , 197-7 , at 8:00 o'clock B.M. , during the regular meeting of the wiNSTON- COLEMAN Board of Commissioners of Orange County, Orange County Courthouse, S BERNHOLI F-hHCYG AT LAW GHAF[L H![.L,N.C. Hillsborough, North Carolina. H�waonnuaH.N. c. The Clerk of the Board of Commissioners is hereby authorized and directed to cause a notice of the public hearing i 1 4 i 1 to be given by publication one time, not less than Ten (10) days } i- prior to October 18 , 19 77 , the date set for the hearing, in a newspaper having a general circulation in Orange County. Such notice shall be in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING ON PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS TO FINANCE A PORTION OF THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COSTS OF PAVING BAYBERRY DRIVE, AZALEA, DRIVE, AND AZALEA PLACE, ROADS LOCATED IN SECTION I OF MORGAN CREEK HILLS SUBDIVISION IN CHAPEL HILL TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Article 9 of Chapter 153A of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the Commissioners for Orange County have adopted a Preliminary Assessment Resolution as follows: 1. Orange County shall undertake financing of the local share of paving Bayberry Drive, Azalea Drive, and Azalea Place, roads located in section I of Morgan Creek Hills Sub- division in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County;- North Carolina. 2. The basis for assessment for the local share of the costs of this project shall be the number of lots served, or subject to be served, at an equal rate per lot. 3. Orange County will assess the total local share according to the basis set out in number 2 above which local share represents approximately seventy-seven percent of the total project cost. 4. No assessments of this project will be held in abeyance. 4 5. The assessments shall be paid in the following manner: a. Within thirty (30) days after the notice of confirmation of the assessment role is published, each owner of the property may WENSTON. CpLEh1AAF pay his assessment in full. a V£RNHOLY ATTORNEY'S AT 2A"' E}iaPEL HII-L.N C, b. Any assessment not paid in full as provided. HIA.4SAOR000N.Yi C. above shall be paid in 5 equal annual installments with the first such installment, with interest, L . due 50 days after the date that assessment roll is confirmed, and the remaining installments, with interest, due on the same date in each successive year until the assessment is paid in full. A public hearing will be held at 8:00 o'clock P.M. , on the 18th day oe October, 1977, at the Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, North Carolina, the regular place of meeting of the Board of Commissioners of orange County, North Carolina, in order to discuss all matters covered by the preliminary assessment resolution. County of Orange Richard E. Whitt d, Chairman Orange County Board of Commissioners (S "' } Attest: !;r, / Clen7c At the time and place above stated any resident of Orange County or any other interested person may appear and be heard. � . / 7 This the day of �'^ '��G , 19�� A atha; R. 0ohnson-�//Clerk of Commissioners for Orange County, North Carolina The Clerk of the Board of Commissioners is hereby authorized and directed to cause a copy of this Preliminary Assessment Resolution to be mailed by first--class mail to each owner, as shown on the county tax records of property subject to assessment if the project is undertaken, not WINSTON.COLEMAN a aERNHOLZ less than TEN (10) days prior to October 18, 1977. ATTORN"S AT taw CHAPEL miu.w C HILL39 p14�0f1.N.C- I The Clerk of the Board of Commissioners is hereby directed to file with the Board of Commissioners a certificate that the Preliminary Assessment Resolution was mailed as directed using a form substantially as follows: CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I, ,Agatha R. Johnson, Clerk of the Board of Commissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, Do HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 6th day of October , 19 77 , I mailed, by first-class mail, postage prepaid, a copy of the Preliminary Assessment Resolution for the financing by Orange County of a portion of the local share of the cost of paving Bayberry Drive, Azalea Drive, and Azalea Place, roads located in Section: I of Morgan Creek Hills Subdivision, in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina, to each owner, as shown on the County tax records of property subject to assessment if the project is undertaken, i i WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of commissioners of orange County North Carolina, "this the day of �1�� �r�_ �, lg_.�! Agati�'a R. Johnson , Clerk of the Board of Commissioners for Orange County, North Carolina This resolution is effective upon its passage. Thereupon Commissioner Jan Finney moved the passage of the foregoing resolution and Commissioner Norman Gustaveson seconded the motion, and the resolution was passed by the following vote: , Ayes: Commissioners Richard Whitted, Norman Gustaveson Jan Pinney, Norman Walker and Donald Uillhoit. Noes: None WINSTON, co1.MMAN ° BrRNHOLT I Agatha R. Johnson, Clerk of the Board of Commissioners FTYOPNf{Y5 AT LAW T g CNFTCL HELL.N.t. NELLutonouc",N�C. for Orange' County, North Carolina, DD HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of the proceedings of said Board of Commissioners at a meeting held on the 3rd day 4 L.t of October , 19 77 , so far as the same relate to the Preliminary Assessment Resolution for the financing by Orange County of a portion of the local share of the cost of paving Bayberry Drive, Azalea Drive, and Azalea Place, roads located in Section I of Morgan Creels Hills Subdivision, in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina, as such proceedings are recorded in Minute Book WITNESS my,hand and the official seal of said Board, this the �� I I r day of 19 Agatha/ R. L7ohnscn/'C1erk of the 1 • Board-'of Commissioners for Orange f. -�'� ; County, North Carolina S,FA7 �G/ l'� .) 1 ..I �'•1 5 � ?_E+ •3 I WMSTON,COLEMAN 6 BERNHOLZ A"RORNLYG AT LAW GIIAPCL HILL_H L HILL=6a ROLOH-N.C A meeting of the Board of Commissioners for Orange County, North Carolina, was held at Hillsborough, North Carolina, the regular place of meeting at 10:00 o'clock a .m. , on October 3, F 19 77. Present: Commissioners Richard L7hi Gustaveson, Jan Pinnev, Norman Walker and Donald Willhoit Absent: None The following resolution was read to the Board: WHEREAS the Board of Transportation of the State of North Carolina has approved a route known as Alternate 1-B for the extension of Interstate 40 from I-85 west of Durham to the Research Triangle Park, which route, if followed, would result in the construction of a major new highway through Orange County and; WHEREAS the Board of Commissioners of orange County oppose the extension of Interstate 40 along Alternate Route 1-B and the construction of a major new highway through Orange County! because, based on the infromation available to date, the Board is of the opinion that the construction of a major new highway through Orange County is not in the best interest of the citizens' of orange County and the citizens of the State of North Carplina;� IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED THAT the orange County Attorney is authorized to take whatever steps necessary, including appropriate court action in opposition to the decision of the Board of Transportation of the State of North Carolina approving Alternate 1-B or any future decisiont of the Board of Transport- ation, or any other Board or Agency, the result of which will be the construction of a major new highway through Orange County. This resolution is effective upon its passage. Thereupon Commissioner Norman Gustav s moved 'IMSTO J. COLEMAN passage of the foregoing resolution and Commissioner Donald a DGANHOLZ Af:'OnHEPS AT LAW :NAFCL 111Lt.-'.C. 11LW;POAO1:.'" N C Willhoit seconded the motion and resolution was passed by the following vote: Ayes: Commissioners Richard TIbit r Jan Pinney and Donald Willhoit- Noes: Commissioner Norman Walker. I, Agatha R. Johnson, Clerk of the Board of Commissions s Y for Orange County, North Carolina, BO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of the proceedings of said Board of Commissioners at a meeting held on October 4, 1977, as such proceedings are recorded in the Minute Book. WITNESS my hand,and the official seal of said Board, this the r day of V CX.a t� , 1977. Agatlih R. Johnso Clerk Boars of Commissioners for Orange County, North Carolina l i l 3 Z 71]NSTON, COLEMAN a OFn NHOLZ Ar'ronrrcrs nY LAW CAAFCL 1111„{.1i.G 111L_5r.CR0VZk.N C A meeting of the Board of Commissioners for Orange County, North Carolina, was held at Hillsborough, North Carolina, the regular place of meeting at 10:00 o'clock a.m. , on October 3, 1977. Present: Commissioners Richard F•'hitted, Norman Walker, Norman Gustaveson, Jan Pinney and Donald Willhoit Absent: None r The following resolution was read to the Board: FINAL ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION FOR THE FINANCING BY ORANGE COUNTY�OF THE LOCAL SHARE OF THE COST OF PAVING NORTH CAROLINA STATE ROAD 1#1820, ALSO KNOWN AS JEFFERSON DRIVE, NORTH CAROLINA, STATE ROAD 41821, ALSO KNOWN AS WASHINGTON DRIVE AND NORTH CAROLINA STATE ROAD 41,822, ALSO KNOWN AS KENNEDY CIRCLE, IN ENO TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. WHEREAS the Board of County Commissioners of Orange County has elected to finance the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road ;1820, also known as Jefferson Drive, North Carolina State Road 1#1821, also known as Washington Drive. and North Carolina State Road 1#1822, also known as Kennedy Circle, located in Eno Township, orange County, as permitted by North Carolina General Statute 6153A185(4) and as provided for in North Carolina General Statute §153A205 a; IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED THAT: 1. Orange County shall undertake the financing of the local share of paving North Carolina State Road 1#1820, also known as Jefferson Drive, North Carolina State Road .1821, also known as Washington Drive and North Carolina State Road 171T1,822, also ]mown as Kennedy Circle, located in Eno Township, Orange County, North Carolina. 2. The basis for assessment for the local share of the cost of this project shall be the area of each lot served by the project at an equal rate per unit of area. 3. Orange County will assess the total local share W114STON.COLEMAN &HERNHOLZ ��,,,,7,., ( 7,, ATTORNPY5 AT .AI" according to the basis Set out in number i 2� above, which local CHAPEL HILL N C }$ILir 601101lG H-N. C share represents approximately forty-five percent (45%) of the total project cost. 4. No assessments of this project will be held in abeyance 5. The assessments shall be paid in the following manner. .' a. Within thirty (30) days after notice of confirma- tion of the assessment role is published, each owner of the property may pay his assessment in full. b. Any assessment not paid in full as provided above shall be paid in 5 equal annual installments with the first such installment, with interest, due 60 days after the date that the assessment roll is confirmed, and one .installment, with interest, due on the same date in each successive year until the assessment is paid in full. This resolution is effective upon its passage. Thereupon, Commissioner Gustaveson moved the passage of the foregoing resolution and Commissioner Pinnev seconded the Motion, and the resolution was passed , by the following votes: Ayes: Commissioners Gustaveson Pinnev Walker M, itted and [lillhoit. Noes: None I, Agatha R. Johnson, Clerk of the Hoard of Commissioners for Orange County, North Carolina, DO,HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true copy of the proceedings of said Hoard of Commissioners at a meeting held on October 3 . 197 so far as the same relate to the Final. Assessment Resolution for the financing by Orange County of the local share of the cost of paving North Carolina State Road .1820, also known as WINSTON� COLEMAN aVEANHOLZ Jefferson Drive, North Carolina State Road .1821, also known as ATiORNZY5 AY LAW .kAI. ZL HILL,H C, HILL500HOU— H Washington Drive and North Carolina State Road 171822, also known 4 = as Kennedy Circle, in Eno Township, Orange County, North Carolina, as such proceedings are recorded in the Minute Book. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said Board, this the _`) day of L•< + ;/� -�4 , 19 !�;'..-- `=rte.. :'• +�:�_.,�_:.;.; ,Agates Ft. Johnson;,'Clerk of the Hoard of Commissioners for Orange County, North Carolina (S E A L) WINSTON.COLEMAN a ©ERNHOLZ ArTQANEYS AT LAW GHAPFL HILL.N.C. H 3LL.9DnOUGH•!i C, 17 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I , Agatha R. Johnson, Clerk of the Board of Commissioners of Ora Age County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 6 h day of October , 19 77 , I mailed, by first- class il, postage prepaid, a copy of the Preliminary Assessment Resolut ion for the financing by Orange County of a portion of the local share of the cost of paving Bayberry Drive, Azalea Drive, and Azalea Place, roads located in Section I of Morgan Creek Hills Subdivision, in Chapel Hill Township, Orange County, North Carolina, to each owner, as shown on the County tax records of property subject to assessment if the project is undertaken. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of Comffissioners of Orange County, North Carolina, this the -' ayof , 19 /7 , Agat R. Johnson/J Clerk of the Board of Conissloners for Orange County, North Carolina