HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 01-28-1980 r
AGENDA ITEM " $
BID RESULTS -
TIRES, WHEELS AND TUBES
T9
NO- QTY- DESCRIPTION.
RIPTION VENDOR :1 VENDOR 2
1. 6 8.75-16.5 IT 8 ply highway $303.95 $315.56
2 4 8.25°20 wheels r NO BID 124.80
3 6 1100 x 20 wheels NO BID 218.44 -
4 4 DR 78-14 regular tread radial 137.32 171.48
5 20 H 78-15 regular tread belted 653.32 711.57
6 8 E 78.14 regular tread belted 225.22 240.70
7 16 1100 x 20 tubes 177.71 227.14
8 6 14" radial tubes 29.88 38.13
9 6 15" radial tubes 33.57 42.12
10 4 GR 78-14 Radial, mud & snow 164.32 181.88
11 9 1100 x 20 12 ply, mud & snow 1;613.57 1,452.48
12 6 1100 x 20 14 ply, regular tread 1,000.58(12 ply) 982.36
Total w/o items 2 & 3 $4,339.44 $4,363,.42
Cost to buy items 2 & Cost to buy all
3 from Vendor 42 w/o items from vendor
benfit of hid prices: 395.20 rig at bid prices:
Total: 4,734.64 $4,706.62
Delivery Time 30 days to days
VENDOR *1 Vendor r2
Super Tire Stares of Raleigh Nu-Tread Tire Co.
2400 Atlantic Ave. 601 poster Street
Raleigh, N.C. Durham, N.C.
BID RECO14MENDATION
It is recommended that Orange County purchase its tires,
wheels and tubes from Nu-Tread 'Tire Co., 601 Foster Street,
Durham, N.C. at a total price of $4,706.62 on the basis of
Lowest responsible price and best delivery time.
AGENDA ITEM # 9
a a 142 E.Margaret Lane
Hillsborough,KC.27278
732-81 B1.6xtens€an an 213 Cehounty Chapel Hill line 967.2231
Mebane line 227.2031
HEALTH DEPARTMENT
Durham tine 688.7931
Carr Mill Mall.suite 225
100 N Greensboro Street
Carrboro,N 27510
942-4168
f E`90 Jerry Robinson,M A.R A
Director
TO: Orange County Commissioners
nc-
FROM: Jerry RobinsonSecretary
Orange County Board of Health
DATE: January 12, 1980
RE: Fee For Service Recommendation For The Well Installation Program
Of The Orange County Health Department
With primacy approval of our Well Ordinance by the Commission for Health
Services, by recommendation of the Health Director, by recomriendation of the
Hoard of Health and by adoption by the County Commissioners, fees may be assessed
for the departmentts services attendant to a well installation,
On Thursday, January 10, 1980, the Orange County Board of Health adopted
recommendations pertinent to private and semi-public well installation fees. This
recommendation is as follows:
The Health Director recommended adoption of such fees based on the logic that
this is a service that would otherwise be paid for by the general taxpayer from which
private profit, directly or indirectly would accrue. Furthermore, that there should
be equal application of such fees to all persons using such services. In concert
with State Statue, such fees were recommended to be assessed for services rendered
and not for any license issued.
A detailed cost analysis which included both Departmental and Orange County
indirect costs was accomplished to establish a base daily rate for-such services.
This cost analysis has been placed on file in both the Hillsborough and Carrboro
offices of the Health Department for public inspection.
The recommended fees are as follows:
Work Level/Cost Pei, Well Service
The calculated cost per man day of sanitation work as of 1/1/80 is $83.77.
There are three phases to a well installation; they are:
1. Well Site Placement Inspection
Estimate 6 per day; 3 at Hall cost because they are a unique trip and 3
at 4 cost because they may be accomplished during the septic initial visit
41.87 = g day at full cost of 83.77
10.47 =, z day at 4 cost
52733 a adjusted daily cost ;. 6 wells per day _ 8.73/well layout plan
- 2 -
Memo - !Orange County Commissioners January 12, 1980
2. Well Installation Inspection
Estimate ability for o4e man to respond to 3 wells
per day. Daily cost = 83,77 = 3 27.92/finished well
(No addition charge for extra trips necessitated
by dry holes)
3. Sampling and Final Inspection
Estimate 8 wells per day. Daily cost = 10.47/well
(Reswnpling visit if necessary is included at no
extra charge)
TOTAL ,BELL FEE'S - 47.12
Therefore, the Board of Health and the
Health Director recommend that the fees
be set as follows:
1. Well Site Placement Inspection 9.00
2, Well Installation Inspection 23,00
3. Sampling and Final. Inspection 10.00
Total fees for the Health Department's
services per each well $ 47.00
JR
RECOMMENDATION TO PURCHASE ADDITIONAL FEATURES
FOR THE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE SYSTEM
Discussions with various departments have identified a need for further
technical features in the new telephone exchange system that were not listed
in the orginal specifications but which are now deemed essential if the
telephone exchange system is to work effectively for all the departments.
Specifically, the feature which is required is "call forwarding" and it would
allow County personnel,when leaving their offices,to code into their
phones the number of the extension where they will be going to or the
extension of a person who would be able to take their messages while they
the person is gone.
By using this feature, the need for an additional switch board with the
accompanying equipment and personnel costs would be eliminated at the
Social Services Department since the central switchboard would send calls
directly to the staff person, who if not in the office would have his or
her phone coded so that it would ring at the receptionist's desk. The
call forwarding feature would also remove problems that occur in many of
the one-person departments who, when out of their offices often have no-
body close by to answer their phone calls. Finally this feature would work
considerably to relieve the central switchboard operator's work load
since very few calls would be returned to the switchboard when no one was
there to answer the extension that was requested.
The call forwarding feature is part of the advanced feature package which
must be purchased in its entirety. Additional features included in this
package include. "standby call queuing","repeat number dialed","private calls",
"do not disturb","executive override" and "station speedcalling". It is
recommended that the County puuchase the advanced feature pacage for the
telephone exchange system at a purchase cost of $5,168.00 or an additional
$685.64 on the semi--annual payment of $18,515.43 for a total of $19,201.07,
4'
Y
l
ORANGE COUNTY LAND USE GOAT STATEMENT
FEBRUARY 1980
Land use planning involves a series of related actions and decisions
which are organized aroVnd and move toward the accomplishment of a set of
goals. Goals are general statements which express ideals toward which the
management of growth and community development is directed» Therefore, the
formulation of goal statements is a key element in orange County's land use
planning process.
The .following chart shows the hierarchical relationships between goals,
policies and im lementation programs:
Survey and description Basic beliefs of
of existing social, C06101JNTTY VALUES individuals which
economic, and natural PROFILE form the basis of
environmental conditions their attitudes
General statements which
express ideals toward GOALS
which the management of
growth and community
development is directed
Statements which emerge
from the goals and which POLICIES
describe definite courses
of public action that
lead ultimately toward
the expressed goal
Specific actions to
accomplish policies. IMPLEMENTATION
Include regulations, PROMMMS
design standards, etc.
Follow--up stage to
analyze effectiveness EVALUATION
of implementation
programs in achieving
expressed goals, could
lead to revision and
updating
COUNTY-MDE LAND USE GOALS
These county--wide goals for Orange County are general in concept and scope.
They-encompass areas over which county government has varying degrees of
influence and are meant to serve as a general guide in developing policies
and rograms related to land use planning.
CATEGORY: NATURAL ENVIRONMENT RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND ENERGY
GOAL ONE: The conservation and protection of Orange County's natural and
u
cultural environments by means which are equitable to all citizens
of the county.
GOAT. TWO: The conservation of natural resources.
GOAL
THREE: The conservation of energy.
GOAT,
FOUR: Development of renewable sources of energy.
CATEGORY: GROWTH
GOAL
FIVE: Direct growth to those areas where growth is desirable and
which are suitable to accomodate it.
GOAL
SIX: Economic development which emphasizes local employment while
preserving the character of communities and protecting the natural
environment.
GOAL
SEVEN: Agricultural land and the farming way of life to continue in
rural areas as a viable part of the County's economy.
CATEGORY: HOUSING
GOAT,
EIGHT: Development of adequate, reasonably priced, safe housing with
an appropriate variety of types for all citizens in proximity
to jobs and daily activities.
CATEGORY: COrSNO ITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES
GOAL
NINE: Provision of water and sewer lines in those areas which can be
practically and efficiently served by these facilities. _, -
GOAL
TEN: Clean and safe water supplies, adequate to meet future demand.
GOAL
ELEVEN: Appropriate sewer disposal facilities for present and future
residents.
GOAL
TUELVE: Improvement of existing transportation ,facilities.
GOAL
THIRTEEN:. Recreational land, structures and open space land to serve
citizen's at both the County wide and community level.
GOAL
FOURTEEN: Full and equal educational opportunities for the people of
Orange County consistent with the wishes of the school district.
GOAL
FIFTEEN: An effecient and effective solid waste collection and disposal
system for Orange County citizens.
GOAL
SIXTEEN: An efficient and effective system of public safety for orange
County citizens.
CATEGORY: INSTITUTION I POLICIES
GOAL
SEVENTEEN: A land use planning process which is responsive to the citizens
and communities of Orange County, including cooperation with
municipalities.