Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 05-26-2015 - C-21 ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AND PLANNING BOARD QUARTERLY PUBLIC HEARING ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: May 26, 2015 Action Agenda Item No. C -2 SUBJECT: Zoning Atlas Amendment: Conditional Zoning — Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning District (MPD -CZ) Hart's Mill DEPARTMENT: Planning and Inspections PUBLIC HEARING: (Y /N) Yes ATTACHMENTS: 1. Application Package 2. Property and Vicinity Map 3. Staff Comments 4. Notes from Neighborhood Information Meeting 5. Notification Materials and Certification Under Separate Cover — Full Scaled Copy of Project Site Plan INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael D. Harvey, Planner III (919) 245 -2597 Craig Benedict, Director (919) 245 -2575 PURPOSE: To hold a public hearing and receive comment on a request to rezone a 112 acre parcel of property to Master Plan Development— Conditional Zoning (MPD -CZ) district in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.9.2 of the Unified Development Ordinance (hereafter `UDO'). BACKGROUND: On December 19, 2014 staff received a request from Ms. Alana Ennis and Hart's Mill LLC to rezone approximately 112 acres of property: From: Rural Residential (R -1), Upper Eno Protected Watershed Protection Overlay District, Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) Overlay District. To: Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning (MPD -CZ), Upper Eno Protected Watershed Protection Overlay District, Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) Overlay District. for the purpose of developing Hart's Mill Village, a 34 unit residential farm community. This request was withdrawn and resubmitted on March 6, 2015 with a revised site plan and narrative. The basic facts concerning the current application are as follows- Applicant(s): Alana Ennis Hart's Mill LLC 4209 Pin Oak Drive Katy Ansardi Durham, NC 27707 PO Box 2844 Chapel Hill, NC 27515 2 Agent(s): Michael Hughes (Engineer) 8112 Orange Grove Road Chapel Hill, NC 27516 Location: Along Frazier Road (SR 1310) approximately 2,900 feet south of the intersection of Frazier and Lebanon Road (SR 1306). Please refer to the property vicinity map contained within Attachment 2 for additional detail. Parcel Information- a. PIN: 9835 -74 -8573. b. Size of parcel: 112 acres. c. Zoning of parcels: Rural Residential (R -1), Upper Eno Protected Watershed Protection Overlay District, Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) Overlay District. Based on the watershed overlay designation the property is limited to 12% impervious surface (585,486 square feet). d. Township: Cheeks. e. Future Land Use Map Designation: 20 Year Transition. f. Growth Management System Designation: Urban. g. Existing Conditions /Physical Features: Varying topography with significant wooded areas and water features (i.e. ponds and streams). The parcel is currently being used to support agricultural operations. h. Roads: Vehicular access to the parcel is via Frazier Road. i. Water and Sewer: The applicant is proposing to extend a water line, serviced by Orange Alamance Water System Incorporated, to serve the project. Individual wells may be installed for irrigation purposes (i.e. farm irrigation). Wastewater is proposed to be handled through the development of a septic system(s) located on the eastern portion of the project, off -site from the proposed residential units. Surrounding Land Uses: a. NORTH: Undeveloped property, agricultural operations, single - family residential properties zoned Rural Residential (R -1) with lots ranging from 2 to 100 acres in area. b. SOUTH: Undeveloped property, agricultural operations, single - family residential properties zoned Rural Residential (R -1) with lots ranging from 5 to 10 acres in area. c. EAST: Undeveloped property, agricultural operations, single - family residential properties zoned Rural Residential (R -1) with lots ranging from 50 to 60 acres in area. d. WEST: Frazier Road, single - family residential properties zoned Rural Residential (R -1) with lots ranging from 1 to 3 acres in area. 3 Conditional Zoning (CZ) Process: The process involves the approval of a rezoning petition and a site plan allowing for the development of a specific land use on a parcel of property. Applications are processed in a legislative manner (i.e. does not require sworn testimony or evidence) and decisions are based on the BOCC's determination that the project is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan. Development Process, Schedule, and Action: The typical cadence for the review of a CZ application is: • First Action — Planning staff schedules a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM). Staff Comment — DONE. This meeting was held on April 8, 2015. A synopsis of comments from this meeting is contained within Attachment 4. • Second Action — The BOCC and Planning Board review the application at 1 of 4 joint Quarterly Public Hearings. Staff Comment — The public hearing is scheduled for May 26, 2015. Supporting documentation was not ready for the project to be presented at the February 19, 2015 Quarterly Public Hearing, which was cancelled due to weather. • Third Action — The Planning Board makes a recommendation on the proposal. Staff Comment — The Planning Board is slated to review this item at its July 2015 regular meeting. • Fourth Action — The BOCC receives the Planning Board recommendation and makes a decision. Staff Comment — Staff anticipates the BOCC receiving this item at its September 1, 2015 regular meeting for final action. Per Section 2.9.2 (F) (3) of the UDO, mutually agreed upon conditions can be imposed as part this process only if they address: 1. The compatibility of the proposed development with surrounding property, 2. Proposed support facilities (i.e. roadways and access points, parking, pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems, screening and buffer areas, etc.) and /or 3. All other matters the County may find appropriate or the petitioner may propose. If approved, the Zoning Atlas will be amended and the zoning designation of the property shall be changed to MPD -CZ. It should be noted this change will not exempt the property from complying with applicable overlay district standards (i.e. watershed or flood hazard). Development of the property, specifically allowable land uses, will be in accordance with the newly created zoning district in accordance with the approved site plan and any imposed conditions. The applicant shall be required to submit a final site plan in accordance within Section 2.5 of the UDO. This is so staff can verify all imposed conditions are adhered to and allow for final peer review by members of the Development Advisory Committee (DAC) as detailed within Section 1.9 of the UDO. There is no additional site plan review fee assessed to the applicant. 0 Proposal: The proposed project is a village style development with approximately 34 dwelling units and involves the preservation of the majority of the property as vegetative open space and farm area (i.e. pasture and crop production). Residences are proposed to range from 1 to 4 bedroom units clustered around a pedestrian trail in the middle of the property surrounded by identified open space /farm areas. A common house, a shared facility approximately 3,000 sq. ft. in area, is proposed to be developed as a place where residents and their guests can meet for community meals, entertainment, and mail pick -up. The project will not involve the creation of individual parcels /lots for these residences. The applicant is proposing to establish a condominium association where homeowners will own the actual residential unit and then own a `share' of the overall development. Hart's Mill LLC will be the primary property owner and assume the responsibility for the perpetual maintenance of the property. STAFF COMMENT. As previously indicated the property is located within a Transition Land Use Category allowing for the submittal of the MPD -CZ application. The project is not required to go through a Class A Special Use Permit review process as a major subdivision creating more than 20 lots as individual parcels of property are not being created for the proposed residences. The applicant, however, has voluntarily submitted documentation detailing compliance with applicable standards at staffs request. Access: Access shall be off of Frazier Road. The applicant is proposing the development of a single driveway for vehicular ingress /egress with parking areas for residents and guests. Individual dwelling units are accessible through a pedestrian path, which will be designed to accommodate emergency vehicles (i.e. fire trucks and ambulances) in the event of an emergency. STAFF COMMENT. Both Planning and NC Department of Transportation (NC DOT) staff have reviewed the proposal and are satisfied with the proposed road layout. Extension of the right -of- way to serve adjacent properties is not viable given the presence of streams and /or floodplains and existing lot layouts. Please refer to Attachment 3 for correspondence between NC DOT and the applicant concerning this project. In discussing the project with Mr. Jason Shepard of the Orange County Emergency Services Department, he has requested a condition be placed on the project that final roadway layout, including widths and access points, be approved by the Fire Marshal's office as part of the final site plan review process. Planning staff concurs with the recommended condition. Utilities: The project is proposed to be served by septic systems located towards the eastern portion of the property. A formal decision has not been made if this is to be accomplished by individual, or a combined, septic system. The system will be reviewed and approved by the State. A water line, maintained by Orange Alamance Water System, shall provide potable water for the project. Individual wells may be installed to serve as irrigation for crop /farm land. The line, proposed to be 6 inches in diameter, will tie into an existing 6 inch line along Frazier Road. 5 STAFF COMMENT. A recommended condition of approval is that proposed septic system layout shall consist of individual septic systems and that Orange County Environmental Health, Planning, and the Attorney's office shall review and approve the various wastewater easements for the system prior to the BOCC taking action on the application. With respect to the serving of the property via the proposed 6 inch line staff has some concerns over the ability of the system to support proposed fire hydrants. As detailed within Attachment 3 the Fire Marshal, Mr. Jason Shepard, has requested additional detail on the proposed line. Planning staff has discussed concerns over the sizing of the line with the applicant's engineer as well. Unfortunately as there is only an existing 6 inch water line to serve the project, placing a larger line within the Hart's Mill development will only result in poor water quality for residents. Staff has asked the developer to provide additional detail on the water line for presentation at the public hearing. Stormwater Drainage: The applicant has tentatively identified a stormwater drainage plan allowing for the natural infiltration of runoff on -site. STAFF COMMENT. Staff has completed a preliminary review of the proposed stormwater drainage system. A recommended condition of approval for this project is the applicant secure all necessary Erosion Control and Stormwater Management permits prior to the commencement of earth disturbing activities. The applicant has been made aware of this potential condition and has expressed no reservations. Land Use Buffers: The applicant is proposing to maintain /provide the following land use buffers: • 20 Foot Type A buffer along Frazier Road and the perimeter of the proeerty, • A buffer along the eastern property line incorporating required buffers from identified streams and floodplains consistent with the provisions of Section 6.13 of the UDO. The applicant is proposing to cluster trees in the proposed land use buffer areas. Existing foliage along the perimeter of the property shall also be preserved to avoid conflicts with adjacent property owners. STAFF COMMENT. Staff has completed a preliminary review of the proposed land use buffers and finds them consistent with UDO requirements. We are, however, requesting additional detail on plantings for proposed residential lots and along the various internal roadways. Solid Waste: Orange County Solid Waste has requested additional detail on how the applicant will dispose of waste. The site plan does not provide sufficient detail on dumpster or trash receptacle location and does not provide information on how trash will be removed. Please refer to Attachment 3 for additional detail. Analysis: As required under Section 2.9.2 (E) of the UDO, the Planning Director is required to: `cause an analysis to be made of the application' and pass that analysis on to the reviewing body. In analyzing this request, the Planning Director offers the following: 1. The application has been deemed complete in accordance with the submittal requirements of Section 2.9.2 (C) of the UDO. R 2. The proposal appears consistent with the various goals outlined within the Comprehensive Plan concerning development, including: a. Land Use Overarching Goal: Coordination of the amount, location, pattern, and designation of future land uses, with availability of County services and facilities sufficient to meet the needs of Orange County's population and economy consistent with other Comprehensive Plan element goals and objectives. b. Land Use Goal 2: Land uses that are appropriate to on -site environmental conditions and features and that protect natural resources, cultural resources, and community character. c. Land Use Goal 3: A variety of land uses that are coordinated within a program and pattern that limits sprawl, preserves community and rural character, minimizes land use conflicts, supported by an efficient and balanced transportation system. 3. The applicant is proposing a density limit for the project of 1 dwelling unit for every 3 acres of property. The current zoning would potentially allow 1 unit for every 40,000 sq. ft. of property. 4. Staff has determined that the proposed development is consistent with existing and anticipated development within the area and the various land uses associated with the project are compatible. 5. The applicant has proposed the development of a solar array on the property. Staff has determined the array will have to comply with permitting requirements detailed within Section 5.2.1 Table of Permitted Uses and 5.9.6 of the UDO. This means the proposed array will require the issuance of a Class B Special Use Permit. Staff recommends a condition be imposed indicating that any solar facility developed on the property shall be required to obtain all required authorizations prior to earth disturbing activity. The applicant is aware of the recommended condition and has agreed. Neighborhood Information Meeting: A neighborhood information meeting for the project was held on April 8, 2015 in accordance with Section 2.9.2 (D) of the UDO. A synopsis of concerns can be found within Attachment 4. Notification Requirements: Per Sections 2.9.2 of the UDO, staff has caused a notice of this hearing to be published: `as least twice in a newspaper of public circulation in the County for two (2) successive weeks: ` no less than ten (10) days nor more than twenty -five (25) days' before the public hearing. The legal ad was published accordingly. On May 8, 2015 staff sent written notice by certified mail to all adjacent property owners located within 500 feet of the subject property as required by Section 2.8.7 of the UDO. On May 15, 2015 staff posted a sign on the property providing a notice of the date, time, and location of the public hearing. Attachment 5 contains the Notification and Certification of mailing. FINANCIAL IMPACT: This request has been reviewed by various County departments who have determined that the approval or denial of the request would not create the need for additional funding for the provision of County services. Costs associated with advertising, including the public hearing notice and mailings, were paid by the applicant in accordance with the adopted Orange County Fee Schedule. 7 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Director recommends the Board: 1. Receive the rezoning application, 2. Conduct the Public Hearing and accept public, BOCC and Planning Board comments on the application, 3. Refer the matter to the Planning Board with a request that a recommendation be returned to the County Board of Commissioners in time for the September 1, 2015 BOCC regular meeting, and 4. Adjourn the public hearing until September 1, 2015 in order to receive the Planning Board's recommendation and any submitted written comments. Attachment 1 O`f o4C ' `orrrrn r IT iT 3. orrlt La <o�� APPLICANT INFORMATION: Date: March 6, 2015 Applicant: Hart's Mill LLC Address: PO Box 2844 Chapel Hill, NC 27515 -2844 PROPERTY SUBJECT TO REQUEST: Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 9835748573 Phone: 919.747.3750 Cell Phone: E -mail: katyPresultworks.com 0 Address of property: 1023 Frazier Rd, Mebane, NC_ Owner of property: Alana Ennis, 4209 Pin Oak Dr, Durham, NC Current Zoning Designation: Requested Zoning Designation: ** If Applicant /Owner are different people, include a signed, notarized, statement indicating that the owner has authorized the applicant to submit the request. In cases where there are multiple property owners, please attach an additional document containing their signatures authorizing the submission of the application or other legal documentation establishing the applicants right to file on their behalf. ** SUBMITTAL INFORMATION - Section 2.8.3 of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) 1) A Map, at a legible scale, showing the property(s) subject to the request. A map may be procured at the Planning Department for a fee in accordance with the adopted Orange County Fee Schedule 2) A legal description of the property(s) proposed for rezoning 3) A list showing the names and addresses of all adjacent property owners within 500 feet of the subject property. 4) A detailed narrative denoting the following: a. The alleged error in the Zoning Atlas (if any) that will be corrected by the proposed request. b. The changed, or changing, conditions (if any) that makes the proposed amendment reasonable necessary to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare. c. How the proposed amendment is consistent with, or carries out the intent and purpose of, the Orange County Comprehensive Plan, In addition to these general requirements, Section 2.9.2 of the UDO requires all Conditional Zoning to submit the following additional information: 1) A site plan prepared in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.5 of the UDO including the following information: a. A detailed description of the proposed use of property including an outline of the proposed operational characteristics of the proposed development. b. A detailed traffic survey, regardless of the estimated number of trips per day, prepared in accordance with all applicable North Carolina Department of Transportation requirements or standards as well as Section 6.17 of the UDO. c. The appropriate environmental document prepared in accordance with Section 6.16 of the UDO, d. A landscape plan showing the location of on -site significant trees; proposed screening, buffers, and landscaping; and any proposed treatment of any existing natural feature e. A summary of utility services f. A schedule for construction/development of the property. g. Other required information identified by staff as part of the pre - application conference, and 2) The filing fee per the adopted Orange County fee schedule in affect as of the date of the application. ** NOTE: Please see attached documentation for submittal and process information associated with a Conditional Zoning request ** I (we), the undersigned, have been made aware of the process for the review and action associated with a Conditional Use application and understand only completed applications, containing all information required by the Orange County UDO shall be reviewed and acted upon by the County. Further I (we) understand that any assistance I (we) may receive from County staff in preparing this application in no way guarantees a favorable recommendation by staff on the erits of this proposal nor does it guarantee an approval of the proposed atlas amendment by the County. Hart's Mill, LLC Applicant Managing Member Date: 3/6/2015 Applicant Date: 0 10 AUTHORIZATION FOR SUBMITTAL OF CONDITIONAL USE REZONING REQUEST I, Alana Ennis, am the sole owner of the property located at 1023 Frazier Rd. Mebane, NC and identified by PIN 9835748573. I hereby grant permission to Hart's Mill, LLC to submit a Conditional Use Rezoning Request, and any other applications related to such a request, to Orange County, NC. Alana Ennis 4209 Pin Oak Dr. Durham, NC 27707 Date I certify that the following person personally appeared before me this day, acknowledging to me that he or she voluntarily signed the foregoing document for the purpose stated therein and in the capacity indicated. This the day of March 2015 A. urav'r� Co J,� C, (Place Seal Here) w kXoTA.9 0l _ , Notary Public 0�9 #1`1Jel.%t'' =v; My commission expires: 13 u 2-o 1 �► �`�• ti •,'�� �E' COtie��, 9 11 Hart's Mill is a farm -based residential development taking shape near Mebane, NC which seeks to create a compact village -style neighborhood with a high quality of life while minimizing resource use and preserving the majority of the land in agriculture, woodlands, and open space. The initiative is being led by a group of local residents who intend to live at Hart's Mill. Hart's Mill has been founded with the intention of modeling integrated, low- impact approaches to residential development and land stewardship. Elements of this goal include: ■ adoption of the best site and building design principles and practices for reducing use of energy, water, and other resources ■ management of the land for diversified food and timber production, wildlife habitat, recreation, research and education • opportunities for aging in place within a vibrant multi - generational community • accessibility to flexible, affordable housing options • onsite opportunities for farm and home -based employment The applicant wishes to develop 32 homes and accessory structures in conjunction with a farm on a 112 - acre parcel of land in Orange County located off Frazier Rd between Mebane and Efland. The property is identified as PIN 9835748573 (see Figure 1) and is currently zoned Rural Residential (R- 1). It has historically been used for pasture, crops, forestry and recreation. With the exception of a small unoccupied house which is scheduled for demolition, there are no buildings located on the property. The surrounding area is also zoned R -1 and current land uses include single family residential, agriculture, and forestry. The applicant is seeking to rezone the parcel to Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning (MPD -CZ) in order to develop a compact village -style pedestrian community that will provide for more efficient land use, protect water quality, significantly reduce impacts on resources and public services compared with conventional residential development, and allow for the majority of the land to permanently remain as open space. 1 I II-°Ilart's MHH MPD CZ ReqUest 12 Figure 1 —Subject Property and Surrounding Parcels DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION Overview The Hart's Mill site is comprised of 112 acres of gently sloping woodland, pasture, field and streams. The applicant has worked with planning and permaculture professionals at Village Habitat Design and Living Systems Design to develop a concept master plan which embodies long -term conservation, restoration and stewardship of the land, as well as low- impact residential development. A major portion of the site will be permanently protected for agricultural, forestry and natural habitat uses through easements, deed restrictions and /or trusts. A compact village of small homes and accessory buildings is planned which will cover only about 15 to 20% of the site on the west side near the entrance to Frazier Road. Two additional homes associated with the farm are planned for the east side of the property, along with a barn, garage, workshop, and shed to support agriculture and forestry activities. Utilizing permaculture principles throughout the site for residential landscaping as well as food and timber production, a diverse and sustainable ecosystem of plants and animals is envisioned that will provide a degree of self - sufficiency for the residents. 2 1 Hart's Mill MPD -CZ Request Figure 2 — Proposed Land Uses The Hart's Mill Master Site Plan elements include: Hart's Mill Facilities Summary Approx SF Approx SF Residential Village Farmstead 1 Common House 3,000 2 Farm House 3,600 9 1- Bedroom House 6,400 1 Barn / Garage 2,910 10 2 Bedroom House 13,000 1 Washing /Packing Shed 640 8 3 Bedroom House 14,400 1 Woodworking Shop 900 1 4 Bedroom House 2,000 1 Pottery Studio & Kiln 600 2 5 Bedroom Shared House 5,600 1 Camping Area (up to 6 sites) Accessory Structures Admin /Education Building (Future) Solar arrays(ground- mounted) 8,000 1 Office /Meeting /Media Building 2,200 Parkingarea covers 5,000 2 Art studios 700 Residential Village 3 1 Hart's Mill MPD -CZ Request 13 The Hart's Mill village proper will consist of 28 single family and duplex houses ranging from very small one bedroom units to modest 2- and 3- bedroom homes. Two shared homes, each consisting of 3 to 5 private suites and common cooking /dining /laundry facilities, will offer flexible housing options for residents aging in place and those with fewer financial resources. The homes will be clustered along a pedestrian lane that will also serve as emergency access, while maintaining views and immediate access to the open space surrounding the village. The concept of clustering homes is a sound approach that reduces the use of land and other resources. Socially, clustering homes encourages awareness of neighbors, safety and collaborative activity, such as gardening, meals, sharing tools, and carpooling. The common areas nestled among and around the homes will become a natural play space for children. Sensitive architectural and site design creates a hierarchy of livable private, semi - private and public spaces for residents. Covered and uncovered parking will be kept to the edges of the village, primarily along the northern field road to the farm. Opportunities for residents to pursue both hobby and professional arts and crafts will be enhanced by the inclusion of a few small studio spaces within the village. A woodworking shop and pottery studio /kiln are planned a short distance away at the farmstead. All of these accessory uses will be on a small scale and none will involve onsite retail sales. Unlike conventional subdivisions, where the development model calls for the creation of individual parcels of property developed independently from one another, this project incorporates the principal of condominium ownership allowing for individual ownership of units while the 'community' owns and maintains the property as a whole. This model provides the necessary guarantees to ensure the perpetual maintenance, care, promotion of vision, and preservation of the site in perpetuity and is vital to ensuring the affordability of individual units consistent with the submitted application. Accessory Facilities The Common House will be a shared facility of approximately 3000 square feet for community meals, entertainment, meetings, guest rooms, arts & crafts, laundry and mail pick up. This facility will provide services and amenities for residents that will allow for smaller private homes and sharing of tools, equipment and appliances, thereby reducing both costs and environmental footprint for these households. It will be located centrally within about 600 feet of most of the homes for easy access by foot. The Common House will be used primarily by Hart's Mill residents and their personal guests. A future administration and education building of about 2200 square feet is planned to the west of the village proper off the entrance road. This facility is expected to house small administrative offices for onsite farm operations and community management, as well as a few "work- almost- from - home" office spaces for residents, and a small meeting space suitable for groups of up to 15 people. This facility will enable Hart's Mill to better carry out its educational mission, and will help residents earn a living on -site, thereby reducing their need to commute. Utilities 41 II-°Ilart's WH MPD CZ ReqUest 14 15 Water Supply. Potable water service for domestic use will be provided by the Orange - Alamance Water System, and may be supplemented by one or more wells for farm or other non - domestic water uses. Sewer & Wastewater. Wastewater will be treated onsite with a community underground drip irrigation system in a field to the east of the village proper. The majority of the site has deep soils suitable for disposal fields and there is ample space —well in excess of the minimum required repair area —for expansion or relocation of the fields, if needed. Power. Electricity will be generated onsite with both a ground- mounted photovoltaic (PV) system of up to 100 kW and smaller building- integrated systems. These will be both grid -tied and stand -alone systems. The long -term goal is for the community to produce as much or more electricity than it uses. Operations Hart's Mill is somewhat unique in that the developers of the community are also its future residents. Therefore, more continuity of the intentions and guiding principles embodied in the master plan is ensured than would typically be the case. For the past two years, the members of Hart's Mill have successfully managed operations and decision - making by employing Dynamic Self- Governance (or Sociocracy). The process was developed by a Dutch electrical engineer in the 1970s and was the governance model adopted in the Netherlands in divisions of Shell, Heineken, Mars, and Pfizer. Based on management principles of transparency, equivalence and effectiveness, Dynamic Governance is being adopted by many organizations and communities in the United States seeking a fair and efficient process to replace dysfunctional management systems. Hart's Mill is committed to the use of Dynamic Governance and has invested in continuing training for its members. From its inception, Hart's Mill has been envisioned with an ownership structure that will keep all of the land in common ownership while allowing for individual ownership interest in homes. At this point, we expect that the community will be legally organized under North Carolina condominium statutes. Responsibility for the management of the common areas of the land, as well as all community infrastructure and activities, will fall under the Hart's Mill Condominium Association (HMCA). The Association will set guidelines, enter into agreements, and monitor performance for non - residential uses of the common area such as farming, timber, recreation and conservation. Individual homeowners will be responsible for maintaining limited common areas immediately adjacent to their homes under guidelines set by the association. Hart's Mill will also include up to two small group homes, each with 3 to 5 private suites sharing a kitchen, laundry, dining and sitting area. These homes are intended for residents who wish to age in place without the responsibility of maintaining an entire house on their own, potential permanent residents who want to get to know the community, farm interns, and residents who may be in transition for other reasons. These two homes may be owned and managed by the HMCA or by a housing cooperative made up of residents. Agriculture and Forestry 16 The property on which Hart's Mill will be located has historically been used for pasture, field crops and forestry. Keeping the majority of the land in these uses is important to both the current owner, whose family has owned the property since 1962, and the founders of Hart's Mill. In addition to the preservation of historic land uses, the purposes of the farm at Hart's Mill include: o Supply community residents with a portion of their food and fiber needs o Provide employment and internship opportunities related to agriculture and silviculture o Explore and model low impact, sustainable and restorative land stewardship practices Farm and woodland operations will be directed and monitored by the Hart's Mill Community Association in accordance with its guidelines. While some future Hart's Mill residents have expressed a desire to actively participate in the work of operating the farm, we plan to enter into agreements with one or more professional farm and forest managers. We prefer that these individuals reside in the community, and at the same time, we realize that this may not be possible in the short term or for every situation. Sites for two houses on the east end of the property have been identified for the possible future need for additional housing with closer proximity to farm operations. Water supply and septic for these homes would be separate from the community systems. The farm at Hart's Mill will produce a wide range of crops such as vegetables, fruits, nuts, berries, and mushrooms in an integrated, permaculture -based system for residents and for sale off -site. There will be no facilities for onsite sales. While most crops will be field - grown, a few greenhouses and hoop houses will be utilized to extend the growing season and range of crops. We will also raise pastured animals to supply eggs, milk, meat, and fiber primarily for use by residents. The number of animals on the site will be strictly limited to the carrying capacity of the pastures with minimal supplemental feed. There will be no confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs) at Hart's Mill. As part of our mission is to provide a model for sustainable land stewardship, we will invite small groups of visitors to experience and learn about integrated farming and silviculture practices from time to time. Since we will also live at Hart's Mill, the number and frequency of these visits will be limited to a level that does not interfere with residents' privacy and enjoyment of the land. ', While we are not applying for a subdivision of property, thereby creating the need to go through the Class A Major Subdivision Special Use Permit review process, we have been encouraged by staff to provide a synopsis of our project's compliance with existing permit requirements /objectives. To that 17 end we offer the following information on how this project will be consistent with the typical findings of fact associated with a Special Use Permit. 1) The use will maintain and promote the public health, safety and general welfare, if located where proposed and developed and operated according to the plan as submitted. The Hart's Mill development will promote the public health, safety and general welfare with careful and responsible design, construction and long -term use and stewardship of the land. As a mission - driven community, we seek to go well beyond the minimum standards and embrace the broader goals of sustainability as described in the Orange County UDO, Section 1.3 - Toward a Sustainable Future: "An emerging point of consensus in Orange County is that we need to move toward becoming a sustainable community. Sustainability is defined as aligning our built environment and socioeconomic activities with the natural systems that support life. The design of a sustainable community in Orange County means that this Comprehensive Plan will strive, in its implementation, to link the economy, the environment and social equity to improve the vitality of all three of these domains." The Hart's Mill community has been conceived and designed to not only embody Sustainability, but to also be a model and educational resource for the larger community. Specific elements include but are not necessarily limited to: Stormwater. A low impact approach to stormwater management will be used that aims to maintain the total stormwater volume at predevelopment conditions and go beyond minimum requirements for new development for compliance with Jordan Lake Rules. Water efficiency. Demand on regional water supply will be minimized by utilizing ultra -low flow fixtures and conservation practices. To the maximum extent feasible, water that is collected onsite will be used for non - potable uses. Wastewater. Wastewater will be responsibly handled onsite with a carefully designed and monitored subsurface drip irrigation system. Domestic wastewater volumes will be minimized through use of efficient plumbing fixtures and water conservation practices. Energy. Energy efficiency —both the embodied energy to extract, process, transport and install building materials and the operating energy to provide services such as heating /cooling and power —is a key objective for Hart's Mill. To reduce operating energy, we will go beyond minimum building code requirements to design high performance buildings that incorporate techniques such as super - insulated building envelopes, passive solar orientation and features, and daylighting. Solar thermal and solar electricity generation will further reduce non - renewable energy use. Materials efficiency. Green building materials will be utilized including certified renewable, recycled, recyclable, reusable, and locally /regionally sourced products. Solid waste will be minimized through onsite solutions such as composting and recycling of not only mandatory recyclables but also comprehensive collection of all recyclable and reusable materials. Indoor Quality. Building products, design and construction techniques will be selected to provide comfort, well- being, and productivity of occupants, especially for indoor air, thermal and lighting quality. This will include reduction in volatile organic compounds and other air impurities, and control of moisture accumulation /water intrusion that could lead to mold growth and other microbiological concerns. Transportation. Hart's Mill will actively promote ride sharing and plans to maintain at least one community -owned vehicle, thereby reducing the need for residents to own extra private vehicles for occasional use. The community will endeavor to provide many opportunities for multigenerational onsite living and working that minimize the need for commuting, running errands, and seeking entertainment and other social needs off site. 2) The use will maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property. An assessment of potential economic impact on surrounding properties and the community as a whole was conducted by Scott Dorsett, a Realtor and real estate appraiser based in Hillsborough, NC. He states in his letter of finding dated May 3, 2015, "I see no adverse effect on any surrounding properties, and to the contrary: this community, once completed will be a thriving, productive, environmentally efficient, taxpaying entity that Orange County can be proud of. ...Hart's Mill may very well serve as a blueprint for future communities in the County." 3) The location and character of the use, if developed according to the plan submitted, will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and the use is in compliance with the plan for the physical development of the county as embodied in these regulations or in the Comprehensive Plan, or portion thereof, adopted by the Board of Commissioners. This proposal conforms to the vision and goals for the area surrounding the property as set forth in the Orange County Land Use Plan. The Cheeks Township area is identified in the Comprehensive Plan as one of the fastest growing areas of the County. The subject site is located in a 20 -year Transition Area, which is defined in the Comprehensive Plan as "an area changing from rural to urban in form and density' and for which "all densities of residential development would be appropriate." Figure 3 — Land Use Plan detail 8 1 Hart's Mill MPD -CZ Request IN With its unique blend of compact site plan, variety of housing choices, low- impact development, onsite food production, and open space preservation, the proposed development plan for Hart's Mill offers a model for bridging rural and urban development that is consistent with the County's vision for this area. Land Use Intensity / Preservation of Natural State The conservation, preservation and restoration of healthy natural systems on the land are a central guiding principle for Hart's Mill. The buildings of the village are tightly clustered to minimize the total developed area of the site. More than 80% of the property will permanently remain in pasture, farm, woodlands and streams. The community is exploring the optimal mix of legal mechanisms to protect the land in perpetuity. In a letter from Rich Shaw of the Orange County Department of Environment, Agriculture, Parks & Recreation date 12/9/2014, he states, "Your intention to leave more than 80% of the property in agriculture, woodlands and protected streams will contribute to the current forested and open space character of the neighborhood east of Frazier Road, which also provides habitat to plants and wildlife that utilize the McGowan Creek corridor." As indicated herein, the developed residential component of the project will occupy a maximum of 20% or approximately 22 acres of property. The remaining acreage shall be preserved as dedicated open space and farm land. The proposed project will effectively double the normal open space area achieved via County subdivision policies and reduce the overall development potential of the site. This will, in turn, reduce the need to disturb existing property for the installation of infrastructure (i.e. roadways, pedestrian access ways, etc.) and allow for a greater percentage of the parcel to be left untouched. Density is being reduced dramatically beyond what is typically allowed within established zoning to ensure promotion of our primary goal: residential development that is integrated with, rather than at the expense of, the natural environment. As we understand the provisions of the County's UDO there are land use intensity ratios for all general use zoning districts. Based on our proposal, Hart's Mill will be observing the following land use intensity ratios, based on current definitions: • Proposed Maximum Allowable Floor Area Ratio (i.e. the cumulative amount of floor area for the project): 0.080 • Proposed Open Space Ratio: 0.83 Enhancement of Residential Privacy 19 20 Careful attention will be given to providing reasonable visual, lighting and acoustic privacy for adjacent residential properties. The Hart's Mill village center is located well away from the public right of way and the few adjacent homes to the north and west. A mixed buffer of evergreen and deciduous trees and shrubs will be located along the north property line from the west entrance on Frazier Rd to the east of the village center. A dense stand of trees is already growing in much of the buffer area. The gentle southern - facing slope of the property provides additional visual separation between the village and adjacent properties to the north. The dense wooded area around the protected pond and stream on the southern boundary provide a large permanent buffer to adjacent properties to the south. Architectural Design Standards In the design of our homes at Hart's Mill, we are striving to embody many aspirations – a low ecological footprint, affordability, community interaction, good health and delightful spaces for everyday living. Architectural design will be guided by standards and principles that have been adopted by the community founders through a series of workshops and meetings. The core overarching principles are: Simplicity: Simple home designs speak to an aesthetic which is not pretentious or wasteful. They are honest and practical. They cost less to build. They provide a restrained backdrop for riotous gardens and a canvas for human creativity. "Simple" doesn't mean plain or boring. Much as great artists such as Matisse and Picasso pared away the excess to capture the essence of their subjects, and traditional Japanese art and gardens express so much beauty with just a few masterful strokes, simple homes can be elegant and graceful. Place. We live in the Southern Piedmont. Summers are hot and humid; winters are cold and wet. Traditional regional architecture responds to the local climate with features such as high ceilings, covered porches, louvered window shades, "dogtrots" to direct breezes and cupolas to exhaust hot air. While modern building science has greatly improved building performance, many of these simple passive design techniques reflected in regional architecture are still useful. Culturally, incorporating elements that evoke regional architectural style into our designs also connects us to this place. Delight. Buildings are not simply functional boxes in which we go about the daily tasks of living. They are also imbued with characteristics that influence our state of mind and our spirit. Certain styles of houses and neighborhoods resonate deeply with us as feeling like "home" and provide a psychological sense of peace and security. Every home should have an element of delight —some design features and bits of whimsy that make us smile. Environmental impact: We seek to reduce our negative impacts on water, energy, pollution and waste to the extent feasible while living a modern lifestyle. Architectural design will be guided by standards which place a strong emphasis on energy efficiency, renewable energy, sustainable and non -toxic materials, durability and indoor air quality. 101 II-°Ilart's MHhI MPD CZ ReqUest 21 By far, the greatest ecological impact of our homes over their very long lifetime is energy use for heating and cooling. No matter how green the fuel used, there is an environmental impact. Therefore, a "prime directive" for our homes must be the most efficient building envelopes (walls, roof, doors & windows) that are affordable and practical for our climate. A second, and no less important, directive is that our homes must be designed and oriented to respond to the sun and wind. All homes should be at least "sun tempered," receiving part of their heating from the sun in cool weather and being shaded from glare and overheating in the warm months. We will utilize green building materials including certified renewable, recycled, recyclable, reusable, and locally /regionally sourced products. Construction waste will be minimized. Building products, design and construction techniques will be selected to provide comfort, well- being, and productivity of occupants, especially for indoor air, thermal and lighting quality; reduce volatile organic compounds and other air impurities, and control moisture accumulation /water intrusion that could lead to mold growth and other microbiological concerns. Ultra -low flow plumbing fixtures will be specified to reduce water demand and wastewater volumes. Landscaping, Buffers and Tree Protection The principles and practices of permaculture will guide not only agriculture and silviculture operations, but also landscaping and gardens throughout the community. The design principles which are the conceptual foundation of permaculture were derived from the science of systems ecology and study of pre - industrial examples of sustainable land use. Permaculture draws from several disciplines including organic farming, agroforestry, integrated farming, sustainable development, and applied ecology. Permaculture design emphasizes patterns of landscape, function, and species assemblies. The focus of permaculture, therefore, is not on each separate element, but rather on the relationships created among elements by the way they are placed together; the whole becoming greater than the sum of its parts. Permaculture design seeks to minimize waste, human labor, and energy input by building systems with maximal benefits between design elements to achieve a high level of synergy. The majority of the development will be located in areas that are now open field, which will greatly minimize clearing. A section of small trees will be removed on the southern side of the village and the edges of the adjacent wooded area will be thinned to create a transition zone of mixed pasture and trees. A large specimen oak at the high point of the site will be preserved as a central feature of the village green. Unfortunately, several adjacent large trees have been severely damaged by weather, age and disease, and cannot be saved. With regard to buffering Hart's Mill from neighboring parcels, there are few homes immediately adjacent to the site, and the majority of those are on the western end. Existing trees on the western and southern property lines will remain undisturbed, continuing to provide a substantial visual barrier for homes in that area. The greatest disturbance will be along the northern boundary on the western end of the property where the entrance road will be built. There is currently an approximately 15 ft. wide buffer of small to medium trees between the northern boundary and an existing unpaved driveway. We 111 II-°Ilart's MHhI MPD CZ ReqUest 22 will attempt to preserve as many of those trees as possible, but it is inevitable that some will be removed in the course of road construction. New plantings of deciduous and evergreen materials ranging in size from small /medium shrubs to large shrubs and understory trees to large shade trees will replace and augment existing vegetation in a 20' ft. wide buffer area along the northern side of the entrance road. Native and non - invasive adapted plant species will be used. A landscape buffer will continue along the northern boundary as the entrance road transitions to an unpaved gravel road, with particular attention to the areas closest to the two homes at the end of Faye Street which abut the subject site. Both homes are on wooded lots, and neither is currently visible from the site. Parking, Loading and Circulation Access to the property will be via a private Class A road connecting to Frazier Road on the western end. The master plan indicates a paved entrance road approximately 650 ft. long which terminates in a loop of sufficient radius to accommodate emergency vehicles and delivery trucks. From that point, there are two separate roads: a paved pedestrian and emergency access lane through the middle of the residential area, and a gravel road running roughly parallel to the pedestrian lane along the northern boundary, then continuing east to the farmstead. Small parking areas are distributed along the western and northern edges of the village proper with a total of 60 parking spaces for residents and their guests. Some of the parking areas may be covered. Residents walk to their homes on surfaced and lighted pathways. One or two electric carts will be provided for those with temporary or permanent conditions which would make walking difficult. Hand carts will also be available for heavy or bulky items. It should be noted that the founders of Hart's Mill worked with Village Habitat Design to develop the initial site plan concepts and schematic design. The issues of circulation and parking have been discussed extensively by the members and have been informed by the expertise of Village Habitat. So while the parking and circulation layout may be unconventional, they are the result of a lengthy and carefully considered process. Water Supply The Orange - Alamance Water System has approved water service to the community from its line on Frazier Rd. An approval letter is included as an addendum. Water supply may be supplemented by a community well for farm or other non - domestic water uses. Hart's Mill has a goal of reducing water demand by at least 50% compared to conventional residential neighborhoods. Developments similar to Hart's Mill have achieved as much as 70% demand reductions. In addition to requiring that all plumbing fixtures meet or exceed EPA Water Sense standards, conservation practices will be actively promoted. Landscape design strategies will be utilized to reduce irrigation needs, and rainwater catchment will provide supplemental non - potable water. 121 II-°Ilart's MHhI MPD CZ ReqUest Sanitary Sewer / Wastewater System 23 A schematic design for sanitary sewer and a subsurface drip irrigation system have been prepared by Tetra Tech. Plans for the Hart's Mill community include residential housing with 67 total bedrooms (when full build -out is achieved), a common house with kitchen and washing machines (for those without a washing machine in their private residence), and an approximately 2,000 square foot education building with no kitchen and seating for 20 people. Additionally, up to four small workshops with sinks only may be developed in the future. Standard design flow rates for each facility type and for the entire system are summarized in the table below, based on the requirements of 15A NCAC 18A .1949. Facility # Unit Unit flow (gpd) Total flow Comments (gpd) Bedrooms 67 Bedroom 120 /bedroom 8040 Common 134 People 5 /meal 670 Kitchen, for grease trap sizing only (assuming 2 people per bedroom)* Education 20 People 10 /person 200 Based on school design flow building requirements Workshops 4 Building 120 /building 480 Based on minimum flow rate per building TOTAL 1 8720 * The flow attributed to the common house has not been added to the total system flow, since this house will only be used by residents of the village. A grease trap sized to handle the potential kitchen flow rate will be provided for pretreatment. A preliminary soil and site evaluation report has been prepared by Agri -Waste Technology (AWT), Inc. (Apex, NC), and dated January 12, 2014. The report identifies, describes, and delineates areas suitable or provisionally suitable for onsite wastewater dispersal. Areas identified with the deepest soils were prioritized for siting the active drain fields for the proposed system. The report also recommended a conventional long term application rate (LIAR) of 0.25 gpd /sf, which is the midpoint LTAR for Type IV (clayey) soil types, per 15A NCAC 18A.1955. The proposed system for Hart's Mill includes the use of subsurface drip irrigation for the dispersal of septic tank effluent. Drip irrigation was selected because of its various advantages over other methods of gravity or pressure dispersal, including: • Shallow dispersal depth which allows for better treatment in the soil and vegetative uptake; • Low - impact installation without damaging existing landscapes, trees, and other natural site features; • Very low instantaneous loading rates with effluent dispersed more evenly over the drainfield area, again improving treatment in the soil and hydraulic performance. To determine preliminary drip irrigation system sizing, the approval document for Innovative Wastewater System No. IWWS- 1993- 1 -R7A, American Perc -Rite Subsurface Drip System, Anaerobic, was consulted. This approval document specifies a LTAR range of 0.15 -0.05 gpd /sf (area basis) for Type IV 131 II-°Ilart's MHhI MPD CZ ReqUest 24 soils. Assuming a mid -point LTAR for the system (consistent with AWT's soil report) results in a preliminary LTAR of 0.10 gpd /sf, which was used along with the design flow to size the active and repair areas. The active drip zones were laid out using standard Perc -Rite design criteria, prioritizing areas on pastureland on the east side of the site, which feature relatively deep soils and can be laid out with vegetated strips between zones. Repair area has been designated on pastureland west of the active drip zones and east of the village. The small development footprint relative to the size of the parcel, large areas of suitable soils, and active use and monitoring of the entire property by residents and farmers are factors that mitigate risk. Solid Waste Hart's Mill will utilize extensive composting, recycling and reuse practices to cut solid waste by 50% or more compared with conventional residential developments. Similar communities have achieved reductions of as much as 75 %. A central collection point for pick -up of solid waste and recycling will be located to the west of the community along the entrance road for easy access by a commercial service. Garbage trucks will not be allowed within the village proper. The collection site will be built in compliance with Orange County requirements, including a concrete pad, screening and water supply for cleaning. Fire Protection Hart's Mill will be served by the Efland Fire Department. Fire hydrants in the village area will be installed according to applicable regulations. In addition, a standpipe will be installed in the pond located on the property with a gravel access road for emergency vehicles. Emergency Access Emergency access to village residences will be provided via a 20 ft. wide pedestrian road loop with limited vehicular access. Removable bollards at each end of the road will allow access for emergency and large delivery /service vehicles as needed, while prohibiting day -to -day passenger vehicles. The road cross section will consist of a 10 ft. wide asphalt and /or concrete surface with 5 ft. "grasscrete" shoulders on a 20 ft. wide compacted sand and gravel base. Access to farm facilities, including two farmhouses, will be via an 18 ft. wide gravel road running parallel to the village pedestrian road. Exterior Lighting The location, type, height, size and direction of exterior lighting fixtures will be selected to minimize glare or direct illumination that interferes with adjacent properties. Exterior lighting will comply with 141 II-°Ilart's MHhI MPD CZ ReqUest 25 Orange County requirements to be "dark sky' friendly. Landscape lighting along walkways, the pedestrian street and near buildings will consist of low - level, energy- efficient fixtures that complement the architecture and are installed near the ground or below eye level. Building- mounted exterior lighting fixtures will be carefully positioned to avoid glare and interference with adjacent properties or homes within the village. Signage A ground mounted double -sided identification sign for the community will be located at the entrance on Frazier Road and will be installed according to Orange County requirements. The sign will be constructed of wood with a masonry base, and will not exceed 32 square feet in area or six feet in height. Any lighting will be provided with energy- efficient LED fixtures and will be carefully placed to avoid glare for motorists or nearby residents. Stream Buffers The subject property abuts two streams — McGowan Creek, which forms the eastern boundary of the parcel, and an unnamed stream which flows from a spring -fed pond located on the western side of the property and flows east across the southern edge into McGowan Creek. The land surrounding both streambeds is heavily wooded and will remain so after development. Stream buffers will exceed the minimum required by North Carolina and Orange County regulations. Storm Water Management The subject property lies within the Neuse River Basin and the Upper Eno Protected Area. The small footprint of the Hart's Mill development keeps the ration of impervious surface well below the 12% threshold for the Upper Eno Protected Area. An integrated storm water management plan utilizing Low Impact Design (LID) principles and practices will be developed for Hart's Mill. Low Impact Design is a comprehensive technology -based approach to managing stormwater. Stormwater is managed in small, cost - effective landscape features located on each lot rather than being conveyed and managed in large, costly pond facilities located at the bottom of drainage areas. The source control concept is quite different from conventional treatment (pipe and pond stormwater management site design). Hydrologic functions such as infiltration, frequency and volume of discharges, and groundwater recharge can be maintained with the use of reduced impervious 15 1 Hart's Mill MPD -CZ Request 26 surfaces, functional grading, open channel sections, disconnection of hydrologic flow paths, and the use of bioretention /filtration landscape areas. LID also incorporates multifunctional site design elements into the stormwater management plan. Such alternative stormwater management practices as on -lot micro storage, functional landscaping, open drainage swales, reduced imperviousness, flatter grades, increased runoff travel time, and depression storage can be integrated into a multifunctional site design. Erosion Control All construction will be carefully and thoughtfully planned to preserve existing landforms and vegetation to the greatest extent possible. A formal erosion control and sedimentation control plan will be submitted for review and approval by the County prior to any land disturbance associated with future site improvements or buildings. Environmental Impact Assessment A separate environment assessment report has been submitted in conjunction with this application. A search of federal and state environmental databases conducted by Tetra Tech indicates no known environment hazards on or immediately surrounding the site. A copy of the search results and conclusions can be found in the environmental assessment report. The Orange County Department of Environment, Agriculture, Parks & Recreation (DEAPR) has also searched the County's environment databases. Rich Shaw writes: There is no significant natural heritage area (SNHA) known to exist on or adjacent to the subject property, however the perennial stream that flows through the length of the tract and McGowan Creek (which forms the eastern boundary) are significant water resources and wildlife corridors that should be protected from any future development activities. Both the stream and McGowan Creek appear to have intact forested buffers that are important to maintain (and possibly enhance) to protect water quality and stream habitats. Both streams are sources of public drinking water for the Orange - Alamance Water System, which operates from Corporation Lake located downstream of the subject property. McGowan Creek is a significant wildlife corridor that links other protected open space properties. There appears to be a healthy population of beaver that utilize the corridor and provide additional habitat due to the flooding conditions that they create. In addition, a copy of the Forest Stewardship Plan prepared in 2013 with assistance from Eno River Association has been provided with this application. Cultural and Archeological Resources Aside from a small abandoned house at the Frazier Road entrance slated for demolition, there are currently no permanent structures on the property. The land has been used for farming, pasture and timber in the past. An old farmhouse and barns were demolished a number of years ago. 161 II-°Ilart's MHH MPD CZ ReqUest 27 In a letter from Rich Shaw of the Orange County Department of Environment, Agriculture, Parks & Recreation date 12/9/2014, he states, "There are no previously identified historic properties or resources located on the subject parcel or on adjacent parcels." He goes on to say that, "The current Cemetery Census map does not show any identified burials on this parcel." Traffic Impact Analysis A traffic impact analysis has been prepared by Michael Hughes, PE in accordance with NCDOT and Orange County requirements. . .1 ANTICIPATED REGULATORY CONDITIONS This request involves the rezoning of the property to what County planning staff has continuously referred to as the Hart's Mill Master Planned Conditional Zoning District. To this end the following general development regulations are being proposed for the project: 1. Permitted residential density for project: 1 dwelling unit for every 3 acres of property 2. Allowable Land Uses: a. Residential: including single - family, two - family (i.e. duplex) and group residential units with a cap of 34 residential dwelling units developable within the zoning district. b. Community House with common facilities including, but not limited to: clothes washing facilities, mail room, activity room, and community kitchen limited to a total square footage of 3,500 sq. ft. c. Administrative office including meeting facilities for local residents. d. Farm operations including: i. 2 barns ii. 2 garages for farm equipment /vehicle storage iii. Produce processing (washing /packing area) iv. Greenhouses & /or hoop houses v. Woodworking shop vi. Pottery studio with kiln e. Accessory uses for residential area shall include: i. Maximum of 2 art /hobby studios for residential use not to exceed a total square footage of 1,000 sq. ft. per building ii. Each residence shall be allowed to operate a minor home occupation in accordance with applicable County application and development standards iii. Parking area /garages iv. Electric car /golf cart charging stations 3. Setbacks: a. No structure shall be located within 100 ft. of the perimeter of the property line. 171 II-°Ilart's MHhI MPD CZ ReqUest W b. Setback for individual residential structures from identified residential spaces: i. Front Yard: 10 ft. ii. Side Yard: 10 ft. iii. Rear Yard: 10 ft. c. All structures shall comply with minimum spacing requirements established within NC State Building Code for separation between structures. 4. Minimum Percentage of Open Space for project: 80% or 89 acres. Farm /pasture operations, as well as off -site septic areas, shall be allowed within this open space area. 5. Provision of waste disposal services: Wastewater shall be disposed on via a shared septic area as denoted on the plan approved by the Orange County Health Department and the State of North Carolina. 6. Access: access to the project shall be through a single access point on Frazier Road. No additional vehicular access points shall be developed. 7. Parking: all vehicles shall be parked in designated areas as identified on the site plan. A total of 60 parking spaces shall be provided for residents and their guests 8. Hart's Mill shall abide by the following dimensional ratios: a. Maximum Allowable Floor Area Ratio (i.e. the cumulative amount of floor area for the project): 0.080 b. Proposed Open Space Ratio: 0.83 A list of property owners within 500' of the subject property for notification of public hearings is attached as an addendum to this document. An initial public information meeting was held on April 8, 2015 at Orange County offices on Margaret Lane in Hillsborough and was attended by staff members as well as Hart's Mill representatives. Two additional public meetings were advertised and held independently by the applicant, one on April 28 at the Mebane Public Library, and the other on May 3 at Lake Michael. A cumulative total of 15 people from neighboring properties attended the three meetings. Questions concerning use of the land, size and types of buildings, traffic, noise, odor (from farm activities), demographics of future residents, and water sources were raised and addressed to the satisfaction of the majority of attendees. A number of people expressed support for the project. Construction of site infrastructure and the initial group of homes is anticipated to begin approximately 12 months after master site plan approval. Full build -out is projected to take up to 5 years. Construction and installation of farm infrastructure — barn, hoop house, fencing, well, etc. — is expected to begin within 6 months of approval. A single residence with a standalone well and septic system may be constructed within the first year prior to development of the community infrastructure to facilitate 181 II-°Ilart's MHhI MPD CZ ReqUest farm operations. 191 II-°Ilart's WH MPD CZ ReqUest 29 30 SCOTT W. DORSETT a REAL.-f OR - REAL ES FATE APPRAISER e CONSULTANT P.O. Box 987, Hfflsborough, NC 27278 a (919) 880-9600 I have personally inspected the subject proposed site (Orange County PIN #9835-74-8573), thoroughly reviewed the proposed concept/site plan and the subject's Master Plan Development. The purpose of all of my efforts was to assess the impact of Hart's Mill on th i'W vs,-; Vii�ole. Mv client for this assignment is Hali, Please call with any questions, and I am thankful for the opportunity to give you my opinion on this project. Respectfully Submitted, Scott W. Dorsett 31 Subject: Summary of Environmental Data Resources Report, Harts Mill Village, 1031 Frazier Road, Mebane, North Carolina 27302 Dear Ms. Ansardi: A review of standard federal and state environmental record sources pertaining to the above referenced Site and surrounding area was conducted using Environmental Data Resources (EDR) on -line database services on March 9, 2015. The EDR Geocheck Report was generated using the minimum search distances recommended in the ASTM 1527 -13 Standard. At the request of Hart's Mill, LLC, a site inspection was not completed as part of this investigation. A summary of the EDR data is provided below: Site: The Site was not identified in the federal or federal databases searched. A list of the databases searched is provided within the EDR Report attached to this letter. Federal Databases: The Site was identified not identified in the federal databases reviewed. State Databases: The Site was not identified in the federal databases reviewed. Abutting Properties: No Abutting Properties to the Site were identified in either the federal or state databases. Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps: The Site is an unmapped property. Building Report: There are no building reports on record. Environmental Liens: There are no environmental liens associated with the property. It should be noted that a 50 year chain of title was not conducted as part of this investigation. Historical Topographic Maps: Historical Topographic Maps from 1968, 1994, and 2002 were reviewed. Each of the maps indicated that the Site was wooded property with a pond created sometime between 1955 and 1968 along the western boundary of the Site. The surrounding areas are a mixture of undeveloped, wooded land and residential homes. Historical Aerial Photographs: Historical Aerial Photographs from 1955, 1975, 1982, 1993, 1998, 1905, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2012 were reviewed. In 1955 the Site and surrounding area consists of wooded land. By 1975, a pond located near the western boundary of the Site is present. In the period from 1982 through 2012 the Site remains wooded with the pond located along the western boundary of the Site. IFeV.ira "'Fech I::::::ingiineeiriing, P.C. One IPark Dirive, Suite 200, I1:1.0. Box 14409, Research Tirian le IPark, NC 27709 Tell 9II9.485.20'70 If:'ax 9II9.485.8280 victor.damato(c _ tetratech.com 10 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Tetra Tech has reviewed an EDR Geocheck Report for property located at 10301 Frazier Road, Mebane, North Carolina. This review has revealed no environmental conditions in connection with the property. Therefore, the results of this assessment do not indicate the need for further investigation. If you have any questions regarding this summary, please contact me at (412) 920 -8639. Sincerely, Tetra Tech Engineering, P.C. Victor D'Amato, PE Vice President cc: Raymond R. Orloski Attachments: EDR reports Era ✓drrtznmental Data Re^urtze.rrces Report, Harts MH V41ag . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 2 32 33 Frazier Road 1031 Frazier Road Mebane, NC 27302 Inquiry Number: 4227876.2s March 09, 2015 6 Anrnshroi g Road, 4 Uh floor slhcd[oll C�l 06484 1 oll Frc�c�� 800 3,h2 00,hO CEDRO' Einv�iroininneintal �Data Resot,urces �linc www cu dlrl lc^[ corn FORM -L88 -ASH 34 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary ---------------------------------------------- - - - - -- 4 Map Findings 8 Orphan Summary --------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- 9 Government Records Searched /Data Currency Tracking GRA GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum------------------------------------ - - - - -- A -1 Physical Setting Source Summary -------------------------------------- - - - - -. A -2 Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map------------------------------------- - - - - -- A -5 Physical Setting Source Map A -13 Physical Setting Source Map Findings---------------------------------- - - - - -- A -15 Physical Setting Source Records Searched------------------------------- - - - - -. PSGRA Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1- 800 - 352 -0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS ". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TC4227876.2s Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527 -13) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 1031 FRAZIER ROAD ORANGE County, NC 27302 COORDINATES Latitude (North): Longitude (West): Universal Tranverse Mercator UTM X (Meters): UTM Y (Meters): Elevation: 36.0939000 - 36° 5' 38.04" 79.2148000 - 79° 12'53.28" Zone 17 660716.8 3995638.0 726 ft. above sea level USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY Target Property Map: 36079 -A2 EFLAND, NC Most Recent Revision: 2002 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT Portions of Photo from: 20120531 Source: USDA TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ( "reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL___________________________ National Priority List TC4227876.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 35 36 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Proposed NPL________________ Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS -------------------- Federal Superfund Liens Federal De listed NPL site list Delisted NPL__________________ National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCL /S list CERCLIS_____________________ Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System FEDERAL FACILITY__________ Federal Facility Site Information listing Federal CERCL /S NFRAP site List CERC - NFRAP ---------------- CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS------------------ Corrective Action Report Federal RCRA non- CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA- TSDF ------------------ RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Federal RCRA generators list RCRA- LQG ------------------- RCRA- Large Quantity Generators RCRA- SQG ------------------- RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRA- CESQG ---------------- RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Federal institutional controls /engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS--------- Engineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROL_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Sites with Institutional Controls LUCIS_________________________ Land Use Control Information System Federal ERNS list ERNS_________________________ Emergency Response Notification System State- and tribal - equivalent NPL NC HSDS_____________________ Hazardous Substance Disposal Site State- and tribal - equivalent CERCL /S SHWS ------------------------- Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory State and tribal landfill and /or solid waste disposal site lists SWF /LF_______________________ List of Solid Waste Facilities OLI____________________________ Old Landfill Inventory State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST -------------------------- Regional UST Database TC4227876.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 37 LUST TRUST_________________ State Trust Fund Database LAST__________________________ Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks INDIAN LUST_________________ Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST___________________________ Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database AST___________________________ AST Database INDIAN UST__________________ Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land FEMA UST____________________ Underground Storage Tank Listing State and tribal institutional control /engineering control registries INST CONTROL-------------- No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP__________________ Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing VCP___________________________ Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS______________ Brownfields Projects Inventory ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS ----------- A Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill/ Solid Waste Disposal Sites ODI___________________________ Open Dump Inventory DEBRIS REGION 9----------- Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations HIST LF_______________________ Solid Waste Facility Listing SWRCY_______________________ Recycling Center Listing INDIAN ODI___________________ Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDL_______________________ Clandestine Drug Labs US HIST CDL_________________ National Clandestine Laboratory Register Local Land Records LIENS 2_______________________ CERCLA Lien Information Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS________________________ Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System IMD___________________________ Incident Management Database SPILLS________________________ Spills Incident Listing SPILLS 90____________________ SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch SPILLS 80____________________ SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch TC4227876.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Other Ascertainable Records m RCRA NonGen / NLR--------- RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated DOT OPS_____________________ Incident and Accident Data DOD__________________________ Department of Defense Sites FUDS_________________________ Formerly Used Defense Sites CONSENT____________________ Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees ROD__________________________ Records Of Decision UMTRA_______________________ Uranium Mill Tailings Sites US MINES____________________ Mines Master Index File TRIS__________________________ Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System TSCA_________________________ Toxic Substances Control Act FTTS__________________________ FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act) /TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) HIST FTTS____________________ FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing SSTS -------------------------- Section 7 Tracking Systems ICIS___________________________ Integrated Compliance Information System PADS_________________________ PCB Activity Database System MLTS_________________________ Material Licensing Tracking System RADINFO_____________________ Radiation Information Database FINDS ------------------------- Facility Index System /Facility Registry System RAATS________________________ RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RMP__________________________ Risk Management Plans UIC ---------------------------- Underground Injection Wells Listing DRYCLEANERS______________ Drycleaning Sites NPDES ------------------------ NPDES Facility Location Listing INDIAN RESERV_____________ Indian Reservations SCRD DRYCLEANERS_______ State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing COAL ASH EPA______________ Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List Financial Assurance ----------- Financial Assurance Information Listing LEAD SMELTERS____________ Lead Smelter Sites COAL ASH____________________ Coal Ash Disposal Sites EPA WATCH LIST____________ EPA WATCH LIST US FIN ASSUR_______________ Financial Assurance Information US AIRS______________________ Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem COAL ASH DOE-------------- Steam - Electric Plant Operation Data PCB TRANSFORMER-------- PCB Transformer Registration Database 2020 COR ACTION----------- 2020 Corrective Action Program List PRP___________________________ Potentially Responsible Parties EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP_____________________ EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR US Hist Auto Stat-------- EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations EDR US Hist Cleaners________ EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LUST____________________ Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank TC4227876.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RGA HWS-------------------- Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List RGA LF_______________________ Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were not identified. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. TC4227876.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 39 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY There were no unmapped sites in this report. TC4227876.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 .N =n o n R d y /0 G raj 4 a i 9 ^11CDVIC \A1 IIA AD _ A741747G 41C Lebanon R,a / T m � R a d g a t P / or soLebanon Rd V z 5 J a / /1 Target Property 1/2 1 Mlles Sites at elevations higher than Indian Reservations BIA or equal to the target property ♦ Sites at elevations lower than Disposal Sites the target property A Manufactured Gas Plants National Priority List Sites Dept. Defense Sites National Wetland Inventory State Wetlands This report includes Interactive Map Layers to display and /or hide map information. The legend includes only those icons for the default map view. 4 40 40 140 I e s t A r e / or soLebanon Rd V z 5 J a / /1 Target Property 1/2 1 Mlles Sites at elevations higher than Indian Reservations BIA or equal to the target property ♦ Sites at elevations lower than Disposal Sites the target property A Manufactured Gas Plants National Priority List Sites Dept. Defense Sites / or soLebanon Rd V z 5 J a / /1 SITE NAME: Frazier Road CLIENT: Tetra Tech NUS, Inc. ADDRESS: 1031 Frazier Road CONTACT: Ray Orlosld Mebane NC 27302 INQUIRY #: 4227876.2s LAT /LONG: 36.0939 / 79.2148 DATE: March 09, 2015 1:14 pm Copyright �o 2015 EDR, Inc. (,) 2010 Tale Atlas Rel. 07/2009. 0 1/4 1/2 1 Mlles Indian Reservations BIA j Hazardous Substance 0 V Oil & Gas pipelines from USGS Disposal Sites 10o -year flood zone 5oo -year flood zone National Wetland Inventory State Wetlands This report includes Interactive Map Layers to display and /or hide map information. The legend includes only those icons for the default map view. SITE NAME: Frazier Road CLIENT: Tetra Tech NUS, Inc. ADDRESS: 1031 Frazier Road CONTACT: Ray Orlosld Mebane NC 27302 INQUIRY #: 4227876.2s LAT /LONG: 36.0939 / 79.2148 DATE: March 09, 2015 1:14 pm Copyright �o 2015 EDR, Inc. (,) 2010 Tale Atlas Rel. 07/2009. r%CT A 11 RA A D _ A 94]7476 RIC * Target Property A Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property Sites at elevations lower than the target property A Manufactured Gas Plants t Sensitive Receptors National Priority List Sites Dept. Defense Sites 0 1/16 1/9 1/4 Mlles Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance 0 V Oil & Gas pipelines from USGS Disposal Sites 10o -year flood zone 5oo -year flood zone National Wetland Inventory State Wetlands This report includes Interactive Map Layers to display and /or hide map information. The legend includes only those icons for the default map view. SITE NAME: Frazier Road CLIENT: Tetra Tech NUS, Inc. ADDRESS: 1031 Frazier Road CONTACT: Ray Orlosld Mebane NC 27302 INQUIRY #: 4227876.2s LAT /LONG: 36.0939 / 79.2148 DATE: March 09, 2015 1:15 pm Copyright �o 2015 ED R, Inc.(,) 2010 Tale Atlas Re 1. 07/2009. 43 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Distance Target Total Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Proposed NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 NPL LIENS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 Federal De listed NPL site list Delisted NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Federal CERCL /S list CERCLIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal CERCL /S NFRAP site List CERC -NFRAP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Federal RCRA non- CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA -TSDF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal RCRA generators list RCRA -LQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 RCRA -SQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 RCRA -CESQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 US INST CONTROL 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 LUCIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal ERNS list ERNS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 State- and tribal - equivalent NPL NC HSDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCL /S SHWS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 State and tribal landfill and /or solid waste disposal site lists SWF /LF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 OLI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 TC4227876.2s Page 4 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Distance Target 0 0 0 NR NR Total Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-1 > 1 Plotted LUST TRUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 LAST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 INDIAN LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 State and tribal registered storage tank lists 0 0 0 NR NR 0 UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 AST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 INDIAN UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 FEMA UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 State and tribal institutional NR NR NR NR NR 0 control/ engineering control registries NR NR NR NR NR 0 INST CONTROL 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites NR NR NR NR NR 0 INDIAN VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 State and tribal Brownfields sites 0 0 0 NR NR 0 BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 FA QQIIIW ZV A0=I01 ►F /I:NZIMI=IZkfil0N=Ks]NImo: Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Local Lists of Landfill/ Solid Waste Disposal Sites ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 DEBRIS REGION 9 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 HIST LF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 SWRCY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 INDIAN ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDL TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 US HIST CDL TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 Local Land Records LIENS 2 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 IMD 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 SPILLS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 SPILLS 90 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 SPILLS 80 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 TC4227876.2s Page 5 45 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY 4 Q : � :1 lei :1:11.1:4 :1611101 N 197 a 10 N =KS] N I EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 EDR US Hist Auto Stat 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 EDR US Hist Cleaners 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 4Q:aNx9ISIN=IN=I111115KSIN=INz1M I=Izrre]:03:11IF /NK Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LUST TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 RGA HWS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 RGA LF TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TC4227876.2s Page 6 Search Distance Target Total Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-1 > 1 Plotted DOT OPS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 DOD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 FUDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 ROD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 UMTRA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 US MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 TRIS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TSCA TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 FTTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 HIST FTTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 SSTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 ICIS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 PADS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 MLTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 RADINFO TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 FINDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 RAATS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 RMP TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 UIC TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 DRYCLEANERS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 NPDES TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 INDIAN RESERV 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 COAL ASH EPA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Financial Assurance TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 LEAD SMELTERS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 COAL ASH 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 EPA WATCH LIST TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 US FIN ASSUR TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 US AIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 COAL ASH DOE TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 PCB TRANSFORMER TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 2020 COR ACTION 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 PRP TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 4 Q : � :1 lei :1:11.1:4 :1611101 N 197 a 10 N =KS] N I EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 EDR US Hist Auto Stat 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 EDR US Hist Cleaners 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 4Q:aNx9ISIN=IN=I111115KSIN=INz1M I=Izrre]:03:11IF /NK Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LUST TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 RGA HWS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 RGA LF TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TC4227876.2s Page 6 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Distance Target Total Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-1 > 1 Plotted NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database M TC4227876.2s Page 7 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site ��•�yrr�y7•nnu� MAP FINDINGS 47 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number TC4227876.2s Page 8 Count: 0 records. ORPHAN SUMMARY City EDR ID Site Name Site Address Zip Database(s) NO SITES FOUND TC4227876.2s Page 9 48 49 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 12/16/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 32 NPL Site Boundaries Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Sources: EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202 - 564 -7333 EPA Region 1 Telephone 617 - 918 -1143 EPA Region 3 Telephone 215 - 814 -5418 EPA Region 4 Telephone 404 - 562 -8033 EPA Region 5 Telephone 312 - 886 -6686 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206 - 553 -8665 EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415- 947 -4246 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 12/16/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202 - 564 -4267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC4227876.2s Page GR -1 50 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal Delisted NPL site list DELISTED NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 12/16/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 32 Federal CERCLIS list Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act ( CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 94 Source: EPA Telephone: 703 - 412 -9810 Last EDR Contact: 02/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/08/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAG) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 07/21/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 13 Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703 - 603 -8704 Last EDR Contact: 01/09/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies CERCLIS- NFRAP: CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Archived sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLIS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 94 Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list Source: EPA Telephone: 703 - 412 -9810 Last EDR Contact: 02/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/08/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. TC4227876.2s Page GR -2 51 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/09/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/29/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 31 Federal RCRA non - CORRACTS TSD facilities list Source: EPA Telephone: 800 - 424 -9346 Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA -TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and /or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/29/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 31 Federal RCRA generators list Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562 -8651 Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA -LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and /or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/29/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562 -8651 Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA -SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and /or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/29/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562 -8651 Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA- CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and /or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/29/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562 -8651 Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4227876.2s Page GR -3 52 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal institutional controls /engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 09/18/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/19/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703 - 603 -0695 Last EDR Contact: 02/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/15/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 09/18/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/19/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703 - 603 -0695 Last EDR Contact: 02/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/15/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 12/03/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/12/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 48 Federal ERNS list Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843 - 820 -7326 Last EDR Contact: 02/16/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 09/29/2014 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/30/2014 Telephone: 202 - 267 -2180 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2014 Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2014 Number of Days to Update: 37 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually State- and tribal - equivalent NPL HSDS: Hazardous Substance Disposal Site Locations of uncontrolled and unregulated hazardous waste sites. The file includes sites on the National Priority List as well as those on the state priority list. Date of Government Version: 08/09/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/05/2011 Number of Days to Update: 27 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCL /S Source: North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis Telephone: 919-754-6580 Last EDR Contact: 02/02/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/18/2015 Data Release Frequency: Biennially TC4227876.2s Page GR -4 53 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially responsible parties. Available information varies by state. Date of Government Version: 11/19/2014 Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2014 Telephone: 919 - 508 -8400 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/21/2015 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/30/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal landfill and /or solid waste disposal site lists SWF /LF: List of Solid Waste Facilities Solid Waste Facilities /Landfill Sites. SWF /LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 12/29/2014 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/30/2014 Telephone: 919 - 733 -0692 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/21/2015 Last EDR Contact: 12/30/2014 Number of Days to Update: 22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi - Annually OLI: Old Landfill Inventory Old landfill inventory location information. sites). Date of Government Version: 01/05/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/16/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/16/2015 Number of Days to Update: 31 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists (Does not include no further action sites and other agency lead Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources Telephone: 919-733-4996 Last EDR Contact: 01/12/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUST: Regional UST Database This database contains information obtained from the Regional Offices. It provides a more detailed explanation of current and historic activity for individual sites, as well as what was previously found in the Incident Management Database. Sites in this database with Incident Numbers are considered LUSTs. Date of Government Version: 02/06/2015 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2015 Telephone: 919 - 733 -1308 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/16/2015 Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 5 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST TRUST: State Trust Fund Database This database contains information about incurred while remediating Leaking USTs Date of Government Version: 01/09/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/13/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/16/2015 Number of Days to Update: 34 claims against the State Trust Funds for reimbursements for expenses Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources Telephone: 919- 733 -1315 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi - Annually TC4227876.2s Page GR -5 54 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LAST: Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank site locations. Date of Government Version: 02/06/2015 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2015 Telephone: 877 - 623 -6748 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/16/2015 Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 5 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2013 Number of Days to Update: 184 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617- 918 -1313 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 07/30/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2014 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi - Annually INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 10/06/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214- 665 -6597 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 09/23/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/25/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913- 551 -7003 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 11/10/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/14/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206 - 553 -2857 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 01/08/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415- 972 -3372 Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4227876.2s Page GR -6 55 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 11/04/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 11/03/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 12 State and tribal registered storage tank lists Source: EPA, Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies UST: Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST's are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available information varies by state program. Date of Government Version: 02/06/2015 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2015 Telephone: 919 - 733 -1308 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/16/2015 Last EDR Contact: 02/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 5 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly AST: AST Database Facilities with aboveground storage tanks that have a capacity greater than 21,000 gallons. Date of Government Version: 12/18/2014 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/22/2014 Telephone: 919 - 715 -6183 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/20/2015 Last EDR Contact: 12/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 29 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/06/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi - Annually INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 10/06/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2014 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214- 665 -7591 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi - Annually INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 02/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/27/2014 Number of Days to Update: 271 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617- 918 -1313 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4227876.2s Page GR -7 56 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 11/03/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 12 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312- 886 -6136 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 09/23/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/25/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913- 551 -7003 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 11/04/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303 - 312 -6137 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 11/13/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 11/10/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/14/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206 - 553 -2857 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 07/30/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2014 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404 - 562 -9424 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi - Annually TC4227876.2s Page GR -8 57 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202 - 646 -5797 Last EDR Contact: 01/12/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal institutional control/ engineering control registries INST CONTROL: No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring A land use restricted site is a property where there are limits or requirements on future use of the property due to varying levels of cleanup possible, practical, or necessary at the site. Date of Government Version: 11/19/2014 Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2014 Telephone: 919 - 508 -8400 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/21/2015 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/30/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913- 551 -7365 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies VCP: Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites Responsible Party Voluntary Action site locations. Date of Government Version: 11/19/2014 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2014 Telephone: 919 - 508 -8400 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/21/2015 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/30/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi - Annually INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 09/29/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/01/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2014 Number of Days to Update: 36 State and tribal Brownfields sites Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617- 918 -1102 Last EDR Contact: 12/31/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Projects Inventory A brownfield site is an abandoned, idled, or underused property where the threat of environmental contamination has hindered its redevelopment. All of the sites in the inventory are working toward a brownfield agreement for cleanup and liabitliy control. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2014 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2015 Telephone: 919 - 733 -4996 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/21/2015 Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2015 Number of Days to Update: 13 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4227876.2s Page GR -9 58 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. Date of Government Version: 12/22/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/22/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 12/22/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/06/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi - Annually Local Lists of Landfill/ Solid Waste Disposal Sites DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415- 947 -4219 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 SWRCY: Recycling Center Listing A listing of recycling center locations. Date of Government Version: 02/04/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/16/2015 Number of Days to Update: 11 HIST LF: Solid Waste Facility Listing A listing of solid waste facilities. Date of Government Version: 11/06/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2007 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800 - 424 -9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources Telephone: 919- 707 -8137 Last EDR Contact: 02/02/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/18/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources Telephone: 919-733-0692 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2009 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4227876.2s Page GR -10 59 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703 - 308 -8245 Last EDR Contact: 02/02/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/18/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ( "the Department ") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 11/10/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202 - 307 -1000 Last EDR Contact: 03/03/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/15/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ( "the Department ") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 11/10/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 70 Local Land Records Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202 - 307 -1000 Last EDR Contact: 03/03/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/15/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA ('Superfund') lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version: 02/18/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/18/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 37 Records of Emergency Release Reports Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202 - 564 -6023 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/01/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2014 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 12/30/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC4227876.2s Page GR -11 60 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING IMD: Incident Management Database Groundwater and /or soil contamination incidents Date of Government Version: 07/21/2006 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/2006 Telephone: 919 - 733 -3221 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/23/2006 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Number of Days to Update: 22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SPILLS: Spills Incident Listing A listing spills, hazardous material releases, sanitary sewer overflows, wastewater treatment plant bypasses and upsets, citizen complaints, and any other environmental emergency calls reported to the agency. Date of Government Version: 12/17/2014 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/19/2014 Telephone: 919 - 807 -6308 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/21/2015 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2014 Number of Days to Update: 33 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/30/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies SPILLS 80: SPILLS80 data from FirstSearch Spills 80 includes those spill and release records available from FirstSearch databases prior to 1990. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and /or hazardous substance spills recorded before 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 80. Date of Government Version: 06/14/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and /or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90. Date of Government Version: 09/27/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 62 Other Ascertainable Records Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and /or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non - Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/29/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (404) 562 -8651 Last EDR Contact: 12/29/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. TC4227876.2s Page GR -12 61 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2012 Telephone: 202 - 366 -4595 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012 Last EDR Contact: 02/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 42 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/18/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 01/15/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi - Annually FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 06/06/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202 - 528 -4285 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/23/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2014 Telephone: Varies Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Last EDR Contact: 12/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 31 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 11/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/12/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: EPA Telephone: 703 - 416 -0223 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/23/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand -like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. Date of Government Version: 09/14/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/01/2012 Number of Days to Update: 146 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505 - 845 -0011 Last EDR Contact: 02/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/08/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. TC4227876.2s Page GR -13 62 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/30/2014 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/31/2014 Telephone: 303 - 231 -5959 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Last EDR Contact: 03/06/2015 Number of Days to Update: 29 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/15/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi - Annually TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2013 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 01/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/08/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/15/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: 202 - 260 -5521 Last EDR Contact: 12/22/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/06/2015 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act) /TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Telephone: 202 - 566 -1667 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2015 Number of Days to Update: 25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/08/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act) /TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202 - 566 -1667 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/08/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA /TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202 - 564 -2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC4227876.2s Page GR -14 63 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA /TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA /TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202 - 564 -2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide - producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1 st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: EPA Telephone: 202 - 564 -4203 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2014 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202 - 564 -5088 Last EDR Contact: 01/09/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and /or brokers and disposers of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/15/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: EPA Telephone: 202 - 566 -0500 Last EDR Contact: 01/16/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 12/29/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301 - 415 -7169 Last EDR Contact: 12/04/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/23/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. TC4227876.2s Page GR -15 64 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/07/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/08/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 12 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 02/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FINDS: Facility Index System /Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C- DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 08/16/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: EPA Telephone: (404) 562 -9900 Last EDR Contact: 02/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/23/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202 - 564 -4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned RMP: Risk Management Plans When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst -case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 08/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2014 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202 - 564 -8600 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/19/2013 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800 - 424 -9346 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/08/2015 Data Release Frequency: Biennially TC4227876.2s Page GR -16 65 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing A listing of uncerground injection wells locations. Date of Government Version: 02/10/2015 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/12/2015 Telephone: 919 - 807 -6412 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2015 Last EDR Contact: 02/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Sites Potential and known drycleaning sites, active and abandoned, that the Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Program has knowledge of and entered into this database. Date of Government Version: 11/17/2014 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/23/2014 Telephone: 919 - 508 -8400 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/21/2015 Last EDR Contact: 12/23/2014 Number of Days to Update: 29 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/06/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies NPDES: NPDES Facility Location Listing General information regarding NPDES(National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) permits. Date of Government Version: 02/02/2015 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/04/2015 Telephone: 919 - 733 -7015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/16/2015 Last EDR Contact: 02/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 12 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/18/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: USGS Telephone: 202 - 208 -3710 Last EDR Contact: 01/15/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi - Annually SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 03/07/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2011 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 02/18/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/17/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: EPA Telephone: 202 - 564 -6023 Last EDR Contact: 02/13/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4227876.2s Page GR -17 66 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 339 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 01/15/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: N/A LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version: 11/25/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/26/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703 - 603 -8787 Last EDR Contact: 01/05/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. Date of Government Version: 11/11/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/25/2012 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703 - 308 -4044 Last EDR Contact: 02/13/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a "Watch List' to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617- 520 -3000 Last EDR Contact: 02/09/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4227876.2s Page GR -18 67 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing Information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post - closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 10/02/2012 Source: Department of Environmental & Natural Resources Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2012 Telephone: 919 - 508 -8496 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2012 Last EDR Contact: 01/16/2015 Number of Days to Update: 23 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information Hazardous waste financial assurance information. Date of Government Version: 09/19/2014 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/19/2014 Telephone: 919 - 707 -8222 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/14/2014 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2014 Number of Days to Update: 25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/30/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH DOE: Sleam- Electric Plan Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202 - 586 -8719 Last EDR Contact: 01/15/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites A listing of coal combustion products distribution permits issued by the Division for the treatment, storage, transportation, use and disposal of coal combustion products. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2007 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/04/2009 Telephone: 919 - 807 -6359 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2009 Last EDR Contact: 02/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 13 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/18/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/23/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202 - 566 -0517 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post - closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. TC4227876.2s Page GR -19 68 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 02/11/2015 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2015 Telephone: 919 - 733 -1322 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2015 Last EDR Contact: 02/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 21 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post - closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 11/19/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 69 US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/16/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202 - 566 -1917 Last EDR Contact: 02/16/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Source: EPA Telephone: 202 - 564 -2496 Last EDR Contact: 02/06/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub - system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and /or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. Date of Government Version: 10/16/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 17 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records Source: EPA Telephone: 202 - 564 -2496 Last EDR Contact: 02/06/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR's researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non - volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC4227876.2s Page GR -20 69 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING EDR US Hist Auto Stat: EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station /filling station /service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include gas station /filling station /service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records ", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR US Hist Cleaners: EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning /laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records ", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina. Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Number of Days to Update: 196 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina. Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: 12/24/2013 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Number of Days to Update: 176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina. TC4227876.2s Page GR -21 70 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2013 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Number of Days to Update: 172 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 07/30/2013 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/19/2013 Telephone: 860 - 424 -3375 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2013 Last EDR Contact: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 45 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/02/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2012 Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: 08/28/2012 Last EDR Contact: 01/12/2015 Number of Days to Update: 40 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2015 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/04/2015 Telephone: 518 - 402 -8651 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/27/2015 Last EDR Contact: 02/04/2015 Number of Days to Update: 23 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/18/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2014 Telephone: 717 - 783 -8990 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/25/2014 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2015 Number of Days to Update: 35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/04/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Source: Department of Environmental Management Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/15/2014 Telephone: 401 - 222 -2797 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2014 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2015 Number of Days to Update: 29 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/08/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC4227876.2s Page GR -22 71 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/2014 Number of Days to Update: 48 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/30/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually Oil /Gas Pipelines: This data was obtained by EDR from the USGS in 1994. It is referred to by USGS as GeoData Digital Line Graphs from 1:100,000 -Scale Maps. It was extracted from the transportation category including some oil, but primarily gas pipelines. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312- 280 -5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410- 786 -3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301 - 594 -6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Child Care Facility List Source: Department of Health & Human Services Telephone: 919- 662 -4499 Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100 -year and 500 -year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetlands Inventory Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources Telephone: 919-733-2090 Scanned Digital USGS 7.5' Topographic Map (DRG) Source: United States Geologic Survey A digital raster graphic (DRG) is a scanned image of a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map. The map images are made by scanning published paper maps on high - resolution scanners. The raster image is georeferenced and fit to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection. TC4227876.2s Page GR -23 72 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC4227876.2s Page GR -24 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS FRAZIER ROAD 1031 FRAZIER ROAD MEBANE, NC 27302 Ifil :Tel =1192 :i•1:2 =I :4 WK90161 N Q I 'I Fit 9*1 Latitude (North): Longitude (West): Universal Tranverse Mercator: UTM X (Meters): UTM Y (Meters): Elevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Target Property Map: Most Recent Revision 36.0939 - 36° 5' 38.04" 79.2148 - 79° 12' 53.28" Zone 17 660716.8 3995638.0 726 ft. above sea level 36079 -A2 EFLAND, NC 2002 EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components: 1. Groundwater flow direction, and 2. Groundwater flow velocity. Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the geologic strata. TC4227876.2s Page A -1 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site - specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY General Topographic Gradient: General North SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES M North I South TIP 0 W nJj. - N- SP SP - m N - - - - .UL A - w -g v v g West I East TIP 1/2 1 Miles Target Property Elevation: 726 ft. Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. TC4227876.2s Page A -2 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways and bodies of water). FEMA FLOOD ZONE Target Property County ORANGE, NC Flood Plain Panel at Target Property: Additional Panels in search area: NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Quad at Target Property EFLAND HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION FEMA Flood Electronic Data YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map 37135C - FEMA DFIRM Flood data Not Reported NWI Electronic Data Coverage YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. AQUIFLOW® Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW Not Reported TC4227876.2s Page A -3 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes move more quickly through sandy - gravelly types of soils than silty - clayey types of soils. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed at which contaminant migration may be occurring. ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Era: Paleozoic Category: Plutonic and Intrusive Rocks System: Ordovian Series: Lower Paleozoic granitic rocks Code: Pzg1 (decoded above as Era, System & Series) Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). TC4227876.2s Page A -4 CCIIDt_n CnII RMAD _ A0]01747C 01e. V V V Ii yr V V V .IV IV1 A r — TL L! V 9 V .r— .7 * Target Property N SSURGO Soil N Water 0 1116 118 1/4 Mile SITE NAME: Frazier Road CLIENT: Tetra Tech NUS, Inc. ADDRESS: 1031 Frazier Road CONTACT: Ray OrlosH Mebane NC 27302 INQUIRY #: 4227876.2s LAT /LONG: 36.0939 / 79.2148 DATE: March 09, 2015 1:15 pm Copyright �o 2015 ED R, Inc.(,) 2010 Tale Atlas Re 1. 07/2009. GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. Soil Map ID: 1 Soil Component Name: Georgeville Soil Surface Texture: silt loam Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro m /sec (pH) 1 0 inches 7 inches silt loam Silt -Clay FINE - GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 6 Min: Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 50 %), silt. Soils. 2 7 inches 61 inches clay Silt -Clay FINE - GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50 %), silt. Soils. 3 61 inches 78 inches silt loam Silt -Clay FINE - GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 50 %), silt. Soils. TC4227876.2s Page A -6 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Soil Map ID: 2 Soil Component Name: Lignum Soil Surface Texture: silt loam Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures. Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained Hydric Status: Partially hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 53 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro m /sec (pH) 1 0 inches 1 inches silt loam Silt -Clay FINE - GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50 %), Lean Clay Soils. 2 1 inches 11 inches silt loam Silt -Clay FINE - GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 7.2 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 2 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50 %), Lean Clay Soils. 3 11 inches 38 inches silty clay Silt -Clay FINE - GRAINED Max: 0.42 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.01 Min: 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50 %), Lean Clay Soils. 4 38 inches 55 inches silt loam Silt -Clay COARSE - GRAINED Max: 4 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 1.4 Min: 4.5 than 35 pct. Sands with fines, passing No. Clayey sand. 200), Clayey Soils. 5 55 inches 78 inches weathered Not reported Not reported Max: 14 Max: Min: bedrock Min: 0 TC4227876.2s Page A -7 Af GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Soil Map ID: 3 Soil Component Name: Soil Surface Texture: Hydrologic Group: Georgeville silt loam Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro m /sec (pH) 1 0 inches 5 inches silt loam Silt -Clay FINE - GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 6 Min: Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 50 %), silt. Soils. 2 5 inches 35 inches clay Silt -Clay FINE - GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50 %), silt. Soils. 3 35 inches 78 inches silt loam Silt -Clay FINE - GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 50 %), silt. Soils. Soil Map ID: 4 Soil Component Name: Enon Soil Surface Texture: fine sandy loam Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained TC4227876.2s Page A -8 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro m /sec (pH) 1 0 inches 7 inches fine sandy loam Silt -Clay COARSE - GRAINED Max: 42 Max: 6.5 Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 14 Min: 5.1 than 35 pct. Sands with fines, passing No. Clayey sand. 200), Silty Soils. 2 7 inches 11 inches Silt -Clay FINE - GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 6.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 5.1 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50 %), Lean Clay Soils. 3 11 inches 33 inches Silt -Clay FINE - GRAINED Max: 1.4 Max: 7.8 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.42 Min: 5.1 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50 %), Lean Clay Soils. 4 33 inches 74 inches loam Silt -Clay COARSE - GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 7.8 Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 1.4 Min: 6.1 than 35 pct. Sands with fines, passing No. Silty Sand. 200), Silty Soils. Soil Map ID: 5 Soil Component Name: Orange Soil Surface Texture: silt loam Hydrologic Group: Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained TC4227876.2s Page A -9 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High Depth to Bedrock Min: > 127 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 61 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro m /sec (pH) 1 0 inches 5 inches silt loam Silt -Clay FINE - GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 6.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 5.1 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 50 %), silt. Soils. 2 5 inches 24 inches silty clay Silt -Clay FINE - GRAINED Max: 1.4 Max: 7.3 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.42 Min: 6.1 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit 50% or 200), Clayey more), Fat Clay. Soils. 3 24 inches 42 inches silt loam Silt -Clay FINE - GRAINED Max: 4 Max: 7.8 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 1.4 Min: 5.6 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50 %), Lean Clay Soils. 4 42 inches 44 inches weathered Not reported Not reported Max: 0.42 Max: Min: bedrock Min: 0.01 Soil Map ID: 6 Soil Component Name: Herndon Soil Surface Texture: silt loam Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches TC4227876.2s Page A -10 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Soil Layer Information Herndon Boundary silt loam Classification Saturated moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse textures. Soil Drainage Class: hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil > 0 inches micro m /sec (pH) 1 0 inches 3 inches silt loam Silt -Clay FINE - GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 6.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 50 %), silt. Soils. 2 38 inches 44 inches silty clay loam Silt -Clay FINE - GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 3.6 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50 %), silt. Soils. 3 44 inches 78 inches silt loam Silt -Clay FINE - GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 3.6 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50 %), silt. Soils. 4 3 inches 7 inches silt loam Silt -Clay FINE - GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 6.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 50 %), silt. Soils. 5 7 inches 38 inches silty clay Silt -Clay FINE - GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 3.6 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50 %), silt. Soils. Soil Map ID: 7 Soil Component Name: Herndon Soil Surface Texture: silt loam Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches TC4227876.2s Page A -11 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro m /sec (pH) 1 0 inches 3 inches silt loam Silt -Clay FINE - GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 6.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 50 %), silt. Soils. 2 3 inches 7 inches silt loam Silt -Clay FINE - GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 6.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 4.5 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 50 %), silt. Soils. 3 7 inches 38 inches silty clay Silt -Clay FINE - GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 3.6 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50 %), silt. Soils. 4 38 inches 44 inches silty clay loam Silt -Clay FINE - GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 3.6 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50 %), silt. Soils. 5 44 inches 78 inches silt loam Silt -Clay FINE - GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 5.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 3.6 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50 %), silt. Soils. LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS EDR Local /Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE (miles) Federal USGS 1.000 Federal FRDS PWS Nearest PWS within 1 mile State Database 1.000 TC4227876.2s Page A -12 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP Al USGS40000893551 0 - 1/8 Mile WSW A2 USGS40000893565 0 - 1/8 Mile WNW 3 USGS40000893701 1/2 - 1 Mile NE FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP No PWS System Found Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP No Wells Found TC4227876.2s Page A -13 0UVC1f%A1 CCrr1K1t_ Cn110f%C RAAD _ A419707G f1� 0 D 0 County Boundary N Major Roads N Contour Lines OO Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater ® Water Wells © Public Water Supply Wells ® Cluster of Multiple Icons 0 0 a 0 0 1/4 1/2 1 Miles Groundwater Flow Direction Wildlife Areas Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location Natural Areas c v Groundwater Flow Varies at Location o Rare & Endangered Species SITE NAME: Frazier Road CLIENT: Tetra Tech NUS, Inc. ADDRESS: 1031 Frazier Road CONTACT: Ray OrlosH Mebane NC 27302 INQUIRY #: 4227876.2s LAT /LONG: 36.0939 / 79.2148 DATE: March 09, 2015 1:15 pm Copyright �o 2015 ED R, Inc.(,) 2010 Tale Atlas Re 1. 07/2009. GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Database EDR ID Number Al WSW FED USGS USGS40000893551 0 - 1/8 Mile Lower Org.Identifier: USGS -NC USGS North Carolina Water Science Center Formal name: USGS North Carolina Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS- 360537079125701 Monloc name: OR -502 Not Reported Monloc type: Well 03030002 Drainagearea value: Monloc desc: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Huc code: 03030002 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: 36.09375 Longitude: - 79.2155716 Sourcemap scale: 24000 Horiz Acc measure: 5 Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: 735 Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: 5 Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: US Aquifername: Piedmont and Blue Ridge crystalline -rock aquifers Formation type: Felsic Metaigneous Rock Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19960822 Welldepth: 185 Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: Not Reported Wellholedepth units: Not Reported Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel 1996 -08 -22 25 A2 WNW 0 - 1/8 Mile Higher Org. Identifier: Formal name: Monloc Identifier: Monloc name: Monloc type: Monloc desc: Huc code: Drainagearea Units: Contrib drainagearea units Longitude: Horiz Acc measure: Horiz Collection method: Horiz coord refsys: Vert measure units: Vert accmeasure units: Vertcollection method: Vert coord refsys: Aquifername: Formation type: FED USGS USGS -NC USGS North Carolina Water Science Center USGS-360539079125701 OR-503 Well Not Reported 03030002 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Not Reported Latitude: 36.0943056 - 79.2155716 Sourcemap scale: 24000 5 Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Interpolated from map NAD83 Vert measure val: 735 feet Vertacc measure val: 5 feet Interpolated from topographic map NGVD29 Countrycode: US Piedmont and Blue Ridge crystalline -rock aquifers Felsic Metaigneous Rock USGS40000893565 TC4227876.2s Page A -15 aq GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19961023 Welldepth: 365 Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: Not Reported Wellholedepth units: Not Reported Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 3 NE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Org.Identifier: USGS -NC Formal name: USGS North Carolina Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS- 360614079121001 Monloc name: OR -263 Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 03020201 Drainagearea value: Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: Longitude: - 79.2025158 Sourcemap scale: Horiz Acc measure: 5 Horiz Acc measure units Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: Aquifername: Piedmont and Blue Ridge crystalline -rock aquifers Formation type: Felsic Metaigneous Rock Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19930622 Welldepth: Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: Wellholedepth units: Not Reported Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel 1993 -06 -22 30.0 FED USGS USGS40000893701 Not Reported Not Reported 36.1040279 24000 seconds 690 5 US 300 Not Reported TC4227876.2s Page A -16 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON AREA RADON INFORMATION State Database: NC Radon Radon Test Results Num Results Avg pCi /L Min pCi /L Max pCi /L 3 1.90 0.3 4.4 Federal EPA Radon Zone for ORANGE County: 3 Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi /L. Zone 2 indoor average level — 2 pCi /L and — 4 pCi /L. Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi /L. Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code: 27302 Number of sites tested: 1 Area Average Activity % <4 pCi /L % 4 -20 pCi /L o/. >9(1 nCi /I Living Area - 1 st Floor 0.300 pCi /L 100% 0% 0% Living Area - 2nd Floor Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Basement Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported TC4227876.2s Page A -17 90 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000 -scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Scanned Digital USGS 7.5' Topographic Map (DRG) Source: United States Geologic Survey A digital raster graphic (DRG) is a scanned image of a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map. The map images are made by scanning published paper maps on high - resolution scanners. The raster image is georeferenced and fit to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection. HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100 -year and 500 -year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetlands Inventory Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources Telephone: 919-733-2090 HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOWR Information System Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed ( SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS) Telephone: 800 - 672 -5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Services, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic ( SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC4227876.2s Page PSGR -1 91 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and /or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION RADON State Database: NC Radon Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources Telephone: 919-733-4984 Radon Statistical and Non Statiscal Data Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA /State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800 - 457 -6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR's Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey TC4227876.2s Page PSGR -2 92 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC4227876.2s Page PSGR -3 93 Frazier Road 1031 Frazier Road Mebane, NC 27302 Inquiry Number: 4227876.3 March 09, 2015 6 Airmstrung Riiaiicf, 4vi'm Flcnc)� ToN Fjn:R�e: vg'y),rov',n )rJtrijq , Certified Sanborn® Ma Site Name: Frazier Road 1031 Frazier Road Mebane, NC 27302 EDR Inquiry # 4227876.3 ort Client Name: Tetra Tech NUS, Inc. Foster Place VII Pittsburgh, PA 15220 Contact: Ray Orloski 3/09/15 The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Tetra Tech NUS, Inc. were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com /sanborn. The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. Certified Sanborn Results: Site Name: Address: City, State, Zip: Cross Street: P.O. # Project: Certification # Frazier Road 1031 Frazier Road Mebane, NC 27302 100- RTP- T32904.02 Frazier Road 13831F-46913-1375E UNMAPPED PROPERTY This report certifies that the complete holdings Library, LLC collection have been searched supplied target property information, and fire covering the target property were not found. Limited Permission To Make Copies Sanborn® Library search results Certification # 3831F- 4696 -1375E The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track of the Sanborn historical property usage in approximately 12,000 based on client American cities and towns. Collections searched: Insurance maps Vr Library of Congress V' University Publications of America Vr EDR Private Collection The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866TM Tetra Tech NUS, Inc. (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS ". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 4227876 - 3 page 2 95 Frazier Road 1031 Frazier Road Mebane, NC 27302 Inquiry Number: 4227876.8 March 09, 2015 6 Arnnsllin ng 14��md CEDIR, lllnellllf un, d� If "' 064844 u , I 800 : c 1�d Ua 1 1es��I"c s Ic vvww edr elll .A SECTION About This Report Executive Summary Findings Glossary TABLE OF CONTENTS Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1- 800 - 352 -0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS ". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 97 EDR BUILDING PERMIT REPORT About This Report The EDR Building Permit Report provides a practical and efficient method to search building department records for indications of environmental conditions. Generated via a search of municipal building permit records gathered from more than 1,600 cities nationwide, this report will assist you in meeting the search requirements of EPA's Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527 -13), or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. Building permit data can be used to identify current and /or former operations and structures /features of environmental concern. The data can provide information on a target property and adjoining properties such as the presence of underground storage tanks, pump islands, sumps, drywells, etc., as well as information regarding water, sewer, natural gas, electrical connection dates, and current/former septic tanks. ASTM and EPA Requirements ASTM E 1527 -13 lists building department records as a "standard historical source," as detailed in § 8.3.4.7: "Building Department Records - The term building department records means those records of the local government in which the property is located indicating permission of the local government to construct, alter, or demolish improvements on the property." ASTM also states that "Uses in the area surrounding the property shall be identified in the report, but this task is required only to the extent that this information is revealed in the course of researching the property itself." EPA's Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquires (AAI) states: " §312.24: Reviews of historical sources of information. (a) Historical documents and records must be reviewed for the purposes of achieving the objectives and performance factors of §312.20(e) and (f). Historical documents and records may include, but are not limited to, aerial photographs, fire insurance maps, building department records, chain of title documents, and land use records." Methodology EDR has developed the EDR Building Permit Report through our partnership with BuildFax, the nation's largest repository of building department records. BuildFax collects, updates, and manages building department records from local municipal governments. The database now includes 30 million permits, on more than 10 million properties across 1,600 cities in the United States. The EDR Building Permit Report comprises local municipal building permit records, gathered directly from local jurisdictions, including both target property and adjoining properties. Years of coverage vary by municipality. Data reported includes (where available): date of permit, permit type, permit number, status, valuation, contractor company, contractor name, and description. Incoming permit data is checked at seven stages in a regimented quality control process, from initial data source interview, to data preparation, through final auditing. To ensure the building department is accurate, each of the seven quality control stages contains, on average, 15 additional quality checks, resulting in a process of approximately 105 quality control "touch points." For more information about the EDR Building Permit Report, please contact your EDR Account Executive at (800) 352 -0050. uuirl �� CEDRi' E:nvirr,roc`n(au ital Data Rr..,a.acarce s Vrtr ID��IIDII� � ��ws PROPERTY HISTORY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: SEARCH DOCUMENTATION A search of building department records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR) on behalf of Tetra Tech NUS, Inc. on Mar 09, 2015. TARGET PROPERTY 1031 Frazier Road Mebane, NC 27302 SEARCH METHODS EDR searches available lists for both the Target Property and Surrounding Properties. RESEARCH SUMMARY Building permits identified: NO PERMITS IDENTIFIED The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. An "X" indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report. BUILDING DEPARTMENT RECORDS SEARCHED Name: Alamance County Years: 1981 -2011 Source: Alamance County Inspections Department, HAW RIVER, NC Phone: (336) 570 -4059 Name: Burlington Years: 1980 -2008 Source: Burlington Inspection Division, Burlington, NC Phone: (336) 222 -5090 4227876 -8 Page 1 W TARGET PROPERTY DETAIL 1031 Frazier Road Mebane, NC 27302 No Permits Found TARGET PROPERTY FINDINGS 4227876 -8 Page 2 .. ADJOINING PROPERTY FINDINGS ADJOINING PROPERTY DETAIL The following Adjoining Property addresses were researched for this report. Detailed findings are provided for each address. No Permits Found 100 4227876 -8 Page 3 101 GLOSSARY General Building Department concepts • ICC: The International Code Council. The governing body for the building /development codes used by all jurisdictions who've adopted the ICC guidelines. MOST of the US has done this. Canada, Mexico, and other countries use ICC codes books and guides as well. There are a few states who have added guidelines to the ICC codes to better fit their needs. For example, California has added seismic retrofit requirements for most commercial structures. ■ Building Department (Permitting Authority, Building Codes, Inspections Department, Building and Inspections): This is the department in a jurisdiction where an owner or contractor goes to obtain permits and inspections for building, tearing down, remodeling, adding to, re- roofing, moving or otherwise making changes to any structure, Residential or Commercial. ■ Jurisdiction: This is the geographic area representing the properties over which a Permitting Authority has responsibility. ■ GC: General Contractor. Usually the primary contractor hired for any Residential or Commercial construction work. ■ Sub: Subordinate contracting companies or subcontractors. Usually a "trades" contractor working for the GC. These contractors generally have an area of expertise in which they are licensed like Plumbing, Electrical, Heating and Air systems, Gas Systems, Pools etc. (called "trades "). ■ Journeymen: Sub contractors who have their own personal licenses in one or more trades and work for different contracting companies, wherever they are needed or there is work. ■ HVAC (Mechanical, Heating & Air companies): HVAC = Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning. ■ ELEC (Electrical, TempPole, TPole, TPower, Temporary Power, Panel, AMP Change, Power Release): Electrical permits can be pulled for many reasons. The most common reason is to increase the AMPs of power in an electrical power panel. This requires a permit in almost every jurisdiction. Other commons reason for Electrical permits is to insert a temporary power pole at a new construction site. Construction requires electricity, and in a new development, power has yet to be run to the lot. The temporary power pole is usually the very first permit pulled for new development. The power is released to the home owner when construction is complete and this sometimes takes the form of a Power Release permit or inspection. • "Pull" a permit: To obtain and pay for a building permit. • CBO: Chief Building Official • Planning Department: The department in the development process where the building /structural plans are reviewed for their completeness and compliance with building codes • Zoning Department: The department in the development process where the site plans are reviewed for their compliance with the regulations associated with the zoning district in which they are situated. ■ Zoning District: A pre- determined geographic boundary within a jurisdiction where certain types of structures are permitted / prohibited. Examples are Residential structure, Commercial /Retail structures, Industrial /Manufacturing structures etc. Each zoning district has regulations associated with it like the sizes of the lots, the density of the structures on the lots, the number of parking spaces required for certain types of structures on the lots etc. ■ PIN (TMS, GIS ID, Parcel #): Property Identification Number and Tax Map System number. ■ State Card (Business license): A license card issued to a contractor to conduct business. ■ Building Inspector (Inspector): The inspector is a building department employee that inspects building construction for compliance to codes. ■ C.O.: Certificate of Occupancy. This is the end of the construction process and designates that the owners now have permission to occupy a structure after its building is complete. Sometimes also referred to as a Certificate of Compliance. 102 GLOSSARY Permit Content Definitions • Permit Number: The alphanumerical designation assigned to a permit for tracking within the building department system. Sometimes the permit number gives clues to its role, e.g. a "PL" prefix may designate a plumbing permit. ■ Description: A field on the permit form that allows the building department to give a brief description of the work being done. More often than not, this is the most important field for EP's to find clues to the prior use(s) of the property. ■ Permit Type: Generally a brief designation of the type of job being done. For example BLDG -RES, BLDG - COM, ELEC, MECH etc. Sample Building Permit Data Date: Nov 09, 2000 Permit Type: Bldg - New Permit Number: 101000000405 Status: Valuation: $1,000,000.00 Contractor Company: OWNER- BUILDER Contractor Name: Description: New one store retail (SAV -ON) with drive -thru pharmacy. Certificate of Occupancy. 103 Frazier Road 1031 Frazier Road Mebane, NC 27302 Inquiry Number: 4227876.7 March 09, 2015 6 Arnnsllin ng 14��md CEDIR, lllnellllf un, d� If "' 064844 u , I 800 : c 1�d Ua 1 1es��I"c s Ic vvww edr elll 104 The EDR Environmental LienSearchTm Report The EDR Environmental Lien and AUL Search Report provides results from a search of available current land title records for environmental cleanup liens and other activity and use limitations, such as engineering controls and institutional controls. A network of professional, trained researchers, following established procedures, uses client supplied address information to: • search for parcel information and /or legal description; • search for ownership information; • research official land title documents recorded at jurisdictional agencies such as recorders' offices, registries of deeds, county clerks' offices, etc.; • access a copy of the deed; • search for environmental encumbering instrument(s) associated with the deed; • provide a copy of any environmental encumbrance(s) based upon a review of key words in the instrument(s) (title, parties involved, and description); and • provide a copy of the deed or cite documents reviewed. Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1- 800 - 352 -0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS ". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. EDR Environmental Lien and AUL Search TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 1031 Frazier Road Frazier Road Mebane, NC 27302 RESEARCH SOURCE Source 1: Orange County Recorder Orange, NC PROPERTY INFORMATION Deed 1: Type of Deed: Title is vested in: Title received from: Deed Dated Deed Recorded: Book: Page: Volume: Instrument: Docket: Land Record Comments: Miscellaneous Comments: Legal Description Legal Current Owner: General Warranty Deed Alana Ennis Kimberly Ann Vincent et al 3/31/2014 3/31/2014 5770 504 NA 20140331000051790 NA see exhibit NA see exhibit Alana Ennis Parcel # 1 Property Identifier: 9835748573 Comments: see exhibit ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN Environmental Lien: Found Not Found ❑R OTHER ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS IAULs1 AU Ls: Found ❑ Not Found ❑R 4227876.7 Page 1 105 106 Deed Exhibit 1 N 107 NN40a3100005s790 CACAO WR85770 �504 01131�200 04 fl? 43 PM 1�2 FILED Deborah 6 sr00%g paq�S(Qr or Deads Oranne C " Nce, Par"Droinp FOG 26,00 NC ReaC —YOa f X V73 00 THIS DEED, MADE AND ENTERED INTO THIS THE Z ( DAY OF MARCH, 2014, BY AND BETWEEN PARTY OF THE FIRST PART AND EXCISETAK J 1-73 06) ALANA ENNIS 4209 Pin Oak Drive Durharn, North Caro,llina 27707 PARTY OF THE SECOND PART, WITNESSETH� Cont 'aining .85 acres and bieing designated as "Area C," as shown on Pliat of Survey titledi "Recombination Property Surveyedi for Alana Ennis," dated! _o by Atois Caltemyn and duly recorded in the Orange County Registry at Plat Book I � i- , Page I It . The aforesaid, .85 acres shaill be merged with existing tractl- toget�her with a perpetual right �f—ingress, egress and regress Mongi a 5iO'private right of way as shown on said plat Sll,TE *F NORTH CA9Q61WN—�ffALQF-Q" '4 'SEA,L) LSAT RICE WOODS I,Barbara A., Merritt ..-p A NOTARY'PUB,LIC OF SAID COUNTY, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT KIMBERLY ANN VINCENT GRANTOR, PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME THIS DAY AND ACKNOWLEDGED THE DUE EXECUTION OF THE FOREGOING DEED1 WITNESS MY HAND AND NOTARIAL SEAL, THIS THE .31 DAY OF Karch —2014, Yp() t 'C (iEAL) N T RY PUBLOk, MY COMMISSION EXPIIRES. 9-1-17 R A 7GEAL) NOTARY Phi u N 'ItW� Im 109 Frazier Road 1031 Frazier Road Mebane, NC 27302 Inquiry Number: 4227876.6 March 09, 2015 6 Arnnsllin ng 14��md CEDIR, lllnellllf un, d� If "' 064844 u , I 800 : c 1�d Ua 1 1es��I"c s Ic vvww edr elll 110 EDR Property Tax Map Report Environmental Data Resources, Inc.'s EDR Property Tax Map Report is designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential environmental conditions on a target property by understanding property boundaries and other characteristics. The report includes a search of available property tax maps, which include information on boundaries for the target property and neighboring properties, addresses, parcel identification numbers, as well as other data typically used in property location and identification. NO COVERAGE Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1- 800 - 352 -0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS ". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. ill Frazier Road 1031 Frazier Road Mebane, NC 27302 Inquiry Number: 4227876.4 March 09, 2015 6 Airmstrung Riiaiicf, 4vi'm Flcnc)� ToN Fjn:R�e: vg'y),rov',n )rJtrijq , 112 EDR Historical Topographic Map Report Environmental Data Resources, Inc.s (EDR) Historical Topographic Map Report is designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topographic Map Report includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the early 1900s. Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1- 800 - 352 -0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report AS IS. Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. Historical Topographic Map 113 YM 700 700 / ,o - } : ' U� � i`- (- 8 'I- -i—+ - -•- _ ! �� _ ' 'i� �`h � tom° i �- _ ,'r �� � r ice_ 'i,'pRi -e ��• +.-� y��1 � � a9a a I•V -� � � ,� _ - = > ; em, ij `tl - I.r \ i � � � j �j- - ��•� Q`b ' /' ,,tlt )�(J 1, J. ! 1 �_`- 1�. UT r0 . y 4 • i -1 �� i'� _ ' " em -i.. '5V TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Frazier Road CLIENT: Tetra Tech NUS, Inc. N NAME: EFLAND ADDRESS: 1031 Frazier Road CONTACT: Ray Orloski MAP YEAR: 1968 Mebane, NC 27302 INQUIRY #: 4227876.4 T LAT /LONG: 36.0939 / - 79.2148 RESEARCH DATE: 03/09/2015 SERIES: 7.5 SCALE: 1:24000 Historical Topographic Map 114 J / - _ 2�- v 7ou A-6,4M 0 x675 II 00 h X-f fist- r if Pr�m .7100 0 Ar N 0 Chee�� TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Frazier Road CLIENT: Tetra Tech NUS, Inc. N NAME: EFLAND ADDRESS: 1031 Frazier Road CONTACT: Ray Orloski MAP YEAR: 1994 Mebane, NC 27302 INQUIRY#: 4227876.4 REVISED FROM :1968 LAT/LONG: 36.0939 / -79.2148 RESEARCH DATE: 03/09/2015 SERIES: 7.5 SCALE: 1:24000 Historical Topographic Map 115 !- _ - _'_�,o - _ /� i if ✓ / 1 / "' J_ Vrs- o Jl- w tte U • � �.• V� � " . I` •• � i\ _� 5310 �� � � �� U% Ij •�� �. lip 7 ,q h:�• �q ¢ 1l �-- � 130 � �$ +.: �. 7r � s • n !!% ,. - /r�• _- II'�, t� III �• •� __ � 10 . ;\. jou - • - �dD 6 r 10 , - - - t Ar• s - -• _ � _ li ! 700 0 1 TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Frazier Road CLIENT: Tetra Tech NUS, Inc. N NAME: EFLAND ADDRESS: 1031 Frazier Road CONTACT: Ray Orloski MAP YEAR: 2002 Mebane, NC 27302 INQUIRY #: 4227876.4 T LAT /LONG: 36.0939 / - 79.2148 RESEARCH DATE: 03/09/2015 SERIES: 7.5 SCALE: 1:24000 116 Frazier Road 1031 Frazier Road Mebane, NC 27302 Inquiry Number: 4227876.12 March 10, 2015 6 Airmstrung Riiaiicf, 4vi'm Flcnc)� ToN Fjn:R�e: vg'y),rov',n )rJtrijq , 117 EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR's professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo perdecade. When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive. Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1- 800 - 352 -0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report AS IS. Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. Date EDR Searched Historical Sources: Aerial Photography March 10, 2015 Target Property: 1031 Frazier Road Mebane, NC 27302 Year Scale 1955 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' 1975 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500' 1982 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1 -500' 1993 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1 -500' 1998 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1 -750' 2005 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1 -500' 2006 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1 -500' 2008 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1 -500' 2009 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1 -500' 2010 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1 -500' 2012 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1 -500' Details Source Flight Date: March 29, 1955 USGS Flight Date: November 16, 1975 USGS Flight Date: March 28, 1982 USGS DOQQ - acquisition dates: March 01, 1993 USGS/DOQQ Flight Date: April 02, 1998 EDR Flight Year: 2005 USDA/NAIP Flight Year: 2006 USDA/NAIP Flight Year: 2008 USDA/NAIP Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP Flight Year: 2010 USDA/NAIP Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP 4227876.12 2 118 INQUIRY M 4227876.12 1 YEAR: 1982 ODR 500' f4 3WO 13 A INQUIRY #: 4227876.12 YEAR: 1993 500' A. i INQUIRY M 4227876.12 YEAR: 1998 ��4 l[L EEIR = 750' `4 w mom t *W6 r �* y � r, FL pp IF 0 t f _41b if A yr INQUIRY M 4227876.12 YEAR: 2006 500' i N C-13R • t! ,,," : � -fir + �..w• n. �� � + ! 1. � �'� —' �7 Y!{� .� ,A• rr � r ^'r, yam., ' f +'f 'kJY O �+��•f � '�S': I• ti's OT {F'tH!Lyypf,..: •Y i; ras, {S„ Y,,.�_f' J!:. pr. c + _' ;�i•' � '�i !�Y � ;• 7.. .. ,� �{ i�, f i r�tt` � f ;�7 :'tit:- : ' ; .:. :: i , y .y, + . _ .i ' � � ' .': r , •q:�'� Ii� , 1 �tii �r et ;>r{ •- 1,•r.y ••+++.Y• 3., .� �� 1 .S 5'•y'•. i. '�-t.,, . - f� �. f,l�.. J. . ':i1 N". '. �:', _!�F�1 � r.i. • , •+,+ � i �' r 1: .'' •�C�; .r.r�;';1 :'' r.r; �� -f' : "3y r , '+ =,e•;r � ?J •i • r + -r.,. i t�. '�' :1: �`:• yr. ,l• .r .�!�r '� M y�V..r.SMj���A � � �yi. ��•�i �Jy���rZ �'�•�`• S•- � r R �Y T 11 OF fi rte.; ,..� s .. u,.�� .Sr.�•r •� � .:TOr. ? ' r: . J F'•' fit:.• � �� :4ef•i ��4��•1 U: sue, .�'i }.:F .f .'�� I .7.�':�,�i �� +. .5. / � t r a f .Y.y_''- jv��^p r�i,i �i1�,�: .3�•�'.-'�.�: •:�sv ••�'.., e�� r �� �.r y. "f;trr'��•�T�•,j',a' 'y� �• :fL'� "'�:�i�r��f'l�h, a f'�� ;rf�''�� FM :i' � �, j�3� Y � r� ��i�� S �Yi t� '�y: �{y. °''•,��Ilh r�^�' +• -f��� Ql• K•! ,� .r �.1'n y ,�{;.���, s :i{�i���;k'ul`f Y�-�•rh }r4�- y�{';i�" ,,+ a ",;'Ir� "'�.'r• Siff" s � ,. �,';►£�i %,{�li ii`u�:�� +_i�1�'4�1��'�� • a � rl• s , � 1 7y03 -% �� r •. r f:b � � �i 3' �-�'!t•' rir� ��'� *• .. 4 L '� 1� • �•�' �y t "r i � �'= � r +,:�� •�'t ��g!'T.',• `- gyp, ;�+�1`y[�3, �:{;� rl' ,.i� -� � . • `�: INQUIRY M 4227876.12 YEAR: 2008 4 • ■ l[L EEIR +r • r�'.Y•.: _ .'r r = 500' + r� 'W w I Ai r t' e� - `rr tk 1 tea_, � M ra C if INQUIRY M 4227876.12 YEAR: 2010 500' N611, '19 71. 46 i N A C.— r - J k Y wo �' %..r+•r a J', ■� r�� s��4: -+ � ��' +i r�r ,b� •� L• , `�'. r FYI" r r SE.';•f' Ij�..1;`i.s fir` � �r• • t=� t. '•��i;r�',ir:r!^ 1, ,. r11 fs. _ .- ° C 't - +. �rt r � rrt. t .,� -`1 '� 'F� t.+�F; r=�'•'_'f' �� t y• J; _ 4.' ;�: •, ,fit .�.... .,. i l.•'rs € ter. Irk f s ..■�. °' rr '•`:i. IF jr tj tp I s�y 1. or n. r• a _ . 4 � �. �i %•� ` i p,, � �fr�� .� ' �� � + :tip jr� .■ ti w '1t � � +' _� ; �' f ^�Sr�'� � � n��i �� •�� f' - fit. . r. . �ry INQUIRY #: 4227876.12 4 YEAR: 2012 �� f l[L EDR = 500' 4 i C eel rig• ■ r�.L d' •i C f.y r f � 130 Environmental Assessment Proposed Hart's Mill Site 1023 Frazier Rd, Orange County, NC April 2015 PURPOSE The purpose of this assessment is to evaluate the subject property for the presence of recognized environmental conditions. A residential development is planned for a portion of the site. SITE DESCRIPTION Location and Legal Description The subject property of 112 acres is located in western Orange County approximately two miles northwest of Efland, NC. The primary access is from Frazier Road between Lebanon Road and Hwy 70. The parcel is identified by Property Identification Number (PIN) 9835748573. The most recent survey (2014) by ENT Land Surveys is recorded in Plat Book 114 page 81. Site and Vicinity Characteristics Vicinity The subject property is located in an area of mixed uses including single family residential, farm and forest. The area is experiencing increased residential development and is anticipated to shift from a rural to more urban character over the next 20 years in the Orange County Land Use Plan. Wetlands Wetlands are a significant feature on this property. It encompasses land to the west of McGowan Creek including portions of a small unnamed tributary which flows from the pond east into the main channel. The majority of McGowan Creek and the lower portions of the drainage from the pond are inhabited by Hart's Mill Environmental Assessment I 1 131 American beavers. The construction of beaver dams back up water in these lower areas, raising the water table, and flooding large areas of the creek bottoms. These wetlands are helping to protect water quality in McGowan Creek and beyond, and are providing unique habitats for wetland plant communities as well as waterfowl and other wildlife species. Plant Communities The property totals 112 acres, of which approximately 88 acres are forested. The remainder is composed of cultivated fields, hayfields, and a small farm pond. Cropland, pasture, wetlands, riparian areas, and multiple ages of mixed species forest provide a mosaic of habitats on this property. Because of this diversity in both landforms and land -uses, this property has the potential to support a wide range of species and communities. RECORDS REVIEW Physical Setting & Soils The elevation ranges from 636 feet above sea level where McGowan Creek leaves the property at the southeastern corner, up to 730 feet on a broad ridge top on the northwestern corner. Generally the topography is gently rolling and slopes rarely exceed fifteen percent. The exception to this rule is a limited area of land paralleling the main channel of McGowan Creek, where the land drops sharply to the floodplain and slopes up to fifty percent are present. A copy of a topographic map for the site and immediate area pulled from the Orange County Geographic Information System is included as Figure 1. Based on soil surveys conducted by the Natural Resource Conservation Service, most of the soils on the property consist of well- drained clay and silt loams in the series Georgeville, Cecil, Enon, and Herndon. Many of these soils have been heavily impacted by agricultural use over the last few centuries. The creek bottoms and floodplains are dominated primarily by Chewacla series loam. In general, these soils are somewhat poorly drained, moderately deep, and highly productive. A soils map can be found in the Forest Stewardship Plan in the appendices. Standard Environmental Records A review of standard federal and state environmental record sources pertaining subject site and surrounding area was conducted using Environmental Data Resources (EDR) on -line database services on March 9, 2015. The EDR Geocheck Report was generated using the minimum search distances recommended in the ASTM 1527 -13 Standard. A summary of the EDR data is provided below: Site: The Site was not identified in the federal or state databases searched. A list of the databases searched is provided within the attached EDR Report Federal Databases: The Site was identified not identified in the federal databases reviewed. State Databases: The Site was not identified in the state databases reviewed. Abutting Properties: No Abutting Properties to the Site were identified in either the federal or state databases. Hart's Mill Environmental Assessment 1 2 132 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps: The Site is an unmapped property. Building Report: There are no building reports on record. Environmental Liens: There are no environmental liens associated with the property. Historical Use Information Limited Chain of Title Grantor Grantee Date Book Page Nathaniel Suitt Lee W. Settle Apr 23, 1962 192 165 Catherine M. Suitt Ruby Faye Settle Lee W. Settle Ruby Faye (Settle) Hurt Feb 27 1985 504 532 Judy H. Settle Ruby Faye Hurt Alana M. Ennis Mar 15, 1991 901 453 Kimberly Ann Vincent Kenneth R. Woods Alana M. Ennis Mar 31, 2014 RB5770 504 Leatrice Woods Historical Topographic Maps: Historical Topographic Maps from 1968, 1994, and 2002 were reviewed. Each of the maps indicated that the Site was wooded property with a pond created sometime between 1955 and 1968 along the western boundary of the Site. The surrounding areas are a mixture of undeveloped, wooded land and residential homes. Historical Aerial Photographs: Historical Aerial Photographs from 1955, 1975, 1982, 1993, 1998, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2012 were reviewed. In 1955 the Site and surrounding area consists of wooded land. By 1975, a pond located near the western boundary of the Site is present. In the period from 1982 through 2012 the Site remains wooded with the pond located along the western boundary of the Site. Orange County DEAPR Assessment Orange County Department of Environment, Agriculture, Parks & Recreation conducted a preliminary assessment of the natural and cultural resources on or adjacent to the subject property in the fall of 2014. Excerpts from their letter dated 12/9/2014 and attached to this report include the following statements: Natural Resources: There is no significant natural heritage area (SNHA) known to exist on or adjacent to the subject property, however the perennial stream that flows through the length of Hart's Mill Environmental Assessment 1 3 133 the tract and McGowan Creek (which forms the eastern boundary) are significant water resources and wildlife corridors that should be protected from any future development activities. Cultural Resources: There are no previously identified historic properties or resources located on the subject parcel or on adjacent parcels. The current Cemetery Census map does not show any identified burials on this parcel. FOREST STEWARDSHIP PLAN A Forest Stewardship Plan was prepared in 2013 by Richard Sanders with support from the USDA Forest Service, the NC Forest Service and the Eno River Association. A copy of the plan is included in the appendices. Forest management objectives for the subject property identified in the plan include: • Protection and enhancement of soil and water resources • Generation of income from sound silviculture practices • Conservation of open space through sale of development rights • Facilitation of application of permaculture principles and practices • Maintenance and improvement of wildlife habitat • Family legacy The plan also addresses several elements of natural resources including soil and water, biological diversity, aesthetic quality, recreation, timber, fish and wildlife, threatened and endangered species, forest health, archeological, cultural & historic sites, wetlands, fire, carbon cycle, and s i I vo pa stu re /ag rofo rest ry. SITE RECONNAISSANCE Past and Current Land Use According the current land owner, Alana Ennis, the land has previously been used for farming and timber. It has been in her immediate family since 1962, and Ms. Ennis has owned the property since 1991, so she has firsthand knowledge. This statement is supported by historical aerial photographs. The land is currently being used for farming and timber, as well as recreational activities such as hiking. The developer of the proposed community, Hart's Mill, LLC, holds a lease on the property as well as an option to purchase. Members of the group have spent considerable time on the site for maintenance, social activities, gardening and clearing trails. These activities have provided ample opportunities for observation of soils, flora, fauna and artifacts. Woodland Much of the property was heavily cutover in the late 1990's. Following this timber harvest, a site prep burn was conducted to remove logging slash and facilitate artificial regeneration of loblolly pines, which were planted around 1999. Overall, the pines have performed well, reaching heights of about 40 feet Hart's Mill Environmental Assessment 1 4 134 and diameters averaging 7 inches. Some older trees on the property include those left around the old home site, a narrow and patchy buffer along the riparian areas, and residual timber where quality was somewhat poorer. A few small areas of older pines remain along the northern boundary of the property. Some mixed hardwoods are present in the canopy including white oak, willow oak, black oak, southern red oak, sweet gum, winged elm and red maple. Red mulberry, American holly, American beech, and Florida dogwood are present in the midstory. Along the edges with the field, many invasive plants are present, including, tree -of- heaven, common privet, Japanese stiltgrass, multiflora rose, and Japanese honeysuckle. Structures The only structure currently located on the property is an unoccupied 845 SF house at the Frazier Road entrance. Based on examination of historical aerial photos and conversations with neighbors, the house was probably built in the early 1960s. The building is in very poor structural condition and has no historical or cultural significance. The property owner is planning to demolish the building within the next 90 days. The septic system that served the house has been closed in accordance with Orange County standards and inspected by the OC Health Department. Two adjacent wells have been temporarily capped and are slated to be permanently closed by the property owner in accordance with Orange County standards for well abandonment. Historical aerial photographs show a house and several farm buildings located at the high point of the property in 1955 and through the mid- 1990s. It appears that the buildings were demolished in the late 1990s or early 2000s. A few small chunks of concrete are the only remaining evidence on the site. Storage Tanks No underground or above - ground storage tanks are in evidence, or were reported historically, on the subject property. Utilities There is a power pole with an active meter located at the north property line near the secondary access from Faye Street. In addition, there is an LED street light at the drive gate near the Frazier Road entrance. Threatened and Endangered Species A comprehensive assessment of threatened and endangered species populations has not been conducted. However, during a number of formal and informal evaluations of the property by foresters and biologists, no known endangered or threatened species have been found. Hart's Mill is exploring a partnership with Elon University to place motion - activated cameras at various locations on the site for ongoing monitoring of wildlife. Hart's Mill Environmental Assessment 1 5 CONCLUSION 135 In summary, the subject property has been historically used for low intensity farming and timber operations. It has been owned by the same family for over 50 years. Searches of federal, state and local databases have not revealed any recognized environmental conditions on the site or in the immediate vicinity. Accounts from the owner and long -time neighbors, as well as historical topographic maps and aerial photos support the assumption that there have not been any uses of the land that would create lasting environmental concerns. While degraded by years of agricultural and timber operations, the soils, topography, hydrology and plant communities on the property offer tremendous potential for restoring and maintaining a diverse, healthy ecosystem for food & timber production, wildlife habitat and recreation. Hart's Mill Environmental Assessment 1 6 APPENDICES 136 Site Photographs Topographic Map Aerial Photo EDR Report DEAPR Letter Chain of Title Documents Forest Stewardship Plan Hart's Mill Environmental Assessment Site Photographs 137 F.A't"� ' 4 � S y Hart's Mill Environmental Assessment Orange County, NC GIS Topographic Map - Ennis Property Y., Idle 2<� - %;;A J , 7r': I T , A 138 7 http://server2.co.orange.nc.us/OrangeNCGIS/default.aspx Orange County, NC GIS Aerial Photo - Ennis Property 139 1 inch = 1000 feet Orange County, North Carolina. 140 ORANGE COUNTY ftole Department qf'Environment, Agriculture, Parks Recreation MEMORANDUM To: Katy Ansardi, Managing Member, Harts Mill, LLC From: Rich Shaw, DEAPR Land Conservation Manager Peter Sandbeck, DEAPR Cultural Resources Coordinator Date: December 9, 2014 Re: Preliminary Assessment of the Hart's Mill Property DEAPR staff has completed a preliminary assessment of the natural and cultural resources known to exist on or adjacent to your Hart's Mill property (PIN 9835748573). Natural Resources- There is no significant natural heritage area (SNHA) known to exist on or adjacent to the subject property, however the perennial stream that flows through the length of the tract and McGowan Creek (which forms the eastern boundary) are significant water resources and wildlife corridors that should be protected from any future development activities. Both the stream and McGowan Creek appear to have intact forested buffers that are important to maintain (and possibly enhance) to protect water quality and stream habitats. Both streams are sources of public drinking water for the Orange- Alamance Water System, which operates from Corporation Lake located downstream of the subject property. McGowan Creek is a significant wildlife corridor that links other protected open space properties. There appears to be a healthy population of beaver that utilize the corridor and provide additional habitat due to the flooding conditions that they create. Your intention to leave more than 80% of the property will be left in agriculture, woodlands and protected streams will contribute to the current forested and open space character of the neighborhood east of Frazier Road, which also provides habitat to plants and wildlife that utilize the McGowan Creek corridor. Cultural Resources- There are no previously identified historic properties or resources located on the subject parcel or on adjacent parcels. Since the Forest Management Plan makes reference to an old home site on the high ground near the center of the parcel, we would like to know about any possible physical remains of that home site, and seek permission from the owners to document or photograph any remaining structures or objects. Also, care should be taken to locate, identify and protect any potential human burial sites or cemeteries. The current Cemetery Census map does not show any identified burials on this parcel. If you have questions please contact Rich at 919 - 245 -2514 or Peter at 919 - 245 -2517. ( /7 /r� Y �x eJ� �mada this 23rd day of April, 1962 by Nathaniel Suitt and Wfe, Catherine M. Suitt, of Orange County, North Carolina and husband Lee W. Settle hereinafter called Grantor, to Ruby Faye Settle /of rAlamance County, North- Carolina, hereinafter "tied Grantee. The designations Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall. Include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by the context, _ WITNESSETH: That the Grantor, in consideration of $10.00 and other valuable consideration to him paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is acknowledged„ has bargained and sold, and by these presents does bargln, seila.nd convey to the Grantee, his heirs, successors, and assigns, all of ilia following dascribed real property: A certain tract or parcel of land lying and being In Cheeps. Township, Orange County, North Carolina, more particularly described as follows: .Adjoining the lands of O. Woods, Carl White Estate, and McGowan Street and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron stake on the North side of the farm road, in O. Woods South property Ilne: and designated as the Control corner of the plat hereinafter referred to; running thence S. I' Of W. 796 feet to an Iron stake; thence with the North property line of the Carl White Estate's line, S. 831 Of E. 2,930 feet to a rock pile and corner; thence with Whltels line, S. 3° 151 W. 1,365 ft. to rock and pointers; thence S. 651 451 E. 1,110 ft. to an Iron and rock pile corner; thence N. 3' Of E. 551 ft. to an iron stake; thence contir;iaing N. 3' 01 E. 64 ft. to the center of McGowan Street; thence with the meandertngs of McGowan Street, in a Northwesterly direction to pointers in A. T. Wright's South property line; thence with the South property line of A. T. Wirght, Miller and O. Woods, S. 891 301 W. 31017 feet to the BEGINNING and (Containing 111.5 acres, more or less, according to the survey and plat of F. M. Carlisle, made ,April 3, 1951; entitled "Property of Nathaniel Suitt and wife;l recorded in Flat Book 4, at page 165, Orange County Registry. This conveyance Is made subject to a deed of trust from Nathaniel Suitt and wife, Catherine M. Suitt, to , Trustee, securing a nde to in the sum of $ and recorded in Book 112, page 347, which party of second part agrees to pay. The above property was conveyed to the Grantor by See Book No. page TO HAVE AND TO H.OI_D said real property, will' all privileges, and appurtenances thereunto belonging, to the said Grantee, his heirs, Successors, antl assigns forever. The Grantor c marls Mot he is seized of said real property in fee, and has the right to convey the same in fee simple; that the same I free from all encumbrances twithv any exceptions above stated); and that he will warrant and defend the title to same against the claims of all persons whomsoever. . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunio set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this Deed to be signed in its corporate name by Its duty authorized officers and ils seal to be hereunto affixed by authority of Its Board of Directors, the day and year first above written. r .ter" (SEAL) ;i�Tf " M t J i CS6AL) thLrine_' M - , °" >�Jti {tt �'`,� 1✓ STATE OF J[q!RT�nfJ� R.OLI A, GO TY OF .i`^.MMN C'E 1, _r. `;J" _ _..__,['�6_. --------------- ,-..._ _____ _._ .. r a Watery Public of saki @aunt�,ldo hereby c rt fy,. that Nat aniel Su t and w Catherine M. Suitt �'{ personally appeared 1,0.rn ran this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing deed % my l'sntl nd sift 1 eai Nbt Pub c ( r (� fit ___ �tpril- - ... • is 62 . -r° +'"'x.111, nc My Commission Expires: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, COUNTY OF � , � - -- -- � - - -- The foregoing cartiftcataCs: qt / =(1` l'�y�.. _- .__.._______.-- ____ __ _ _________ _____ _.._,_ a Notary fal+_NgfOAes) Public at the gavmrnrnnntal units d; gnalad ie Wc.o) adludged to Wo correct, Let Bald deed and this cartlticale be reglstercd. This the y �� ... day of (a t—' -_ D eputy Cle rk of Superior C- ,t riiu'd tar reglsirailon an ilia ._. .. .... day oP I Ypt.� _ - -I ym'q. �? �_---• mP— ®u'didcd tea w a,d only recorded In the Dlfice of tile Raglsfnr of Deeds of _._.._.._OTTail l? _.._.�dunYy, N'ortb Garalina, In Book of Oeeds 532 FILED mwamrA04 pxr -532 — E# — MAm' 2 os rM. 'q� RCC;57ZR -3F DEEDS ORANGE MNTY.N.C. RIS Patel �1-1- 142 Fxoiso Tax I Recording TInae, Book and Page Tax Lot No......... ... ..... 1 .. .... ....3. , . Parcel Identifier No. -�.Z C) 9 Verified by ' . ..... ..... .. .... . ..... County on the day of 19 - by... ... ............ ..... . ... .. ..... Mail after recording to Ya 114rtlll, C19 Clyde 7" T „q 407, Gate City_ Fluildi�rig, 201 W. Market St. Gr eensboro, N.C. 274011, This instrument was prepared by Clyde T. FoLlins, A.�r,nelal-t,La,w,,CL-,ee.=4 pr, o,X. Brief description for the Index 1 17, NORTH CAROLINA GENERALWARRANTY DEED THIS DEED made this 27th day of February. 19 8 5 , by and between GRANTOR i GRANTEE 1--e W. Settle and wife, Judy H. Settle R2bY Faye Hurt (fo=erly k3by Faye Settle) Enter In appropriate block for each party: ounie, iddress, and, it appropriate, character of entiry, e,q, corportrijun or partnership. The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, suocessor.q, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, ferninine or neuter as required by context. WITNESSETIT, that the Grantor, for a valkiablp consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of whidi is hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents does I;rant, bargain, sell and convey auto the Grantee in fee simple, all that certain lot or parcel of land situated in the City of Cheeks.. Township, Orange . County, North Carolina and more particularly described as follows. Adjoining the lands of Q. Woods, Carl White Estate, and NIcGowan Street and rore particularly described as follows- BIDGINNIM3 at an iron stake on the North side of the farm road, im 0. M*ds South propexty line and designated as the Control corner of the plat hereinafter referred to; running thence S. 10 01 11. 798 feet to an iron stake, thence with the Mrt-b property, line of the Carl White Estate's line, S. 83* Or E. 2,930 feet to a rock pile and corner; thence with white's line, S. 30 151 W. 1,365 ft. to rock,and pointers, thence S. 850 431 E. 1,110 ft. to an iron and rock pile corner; thence N. 3° Or E. 551 ft. to an iron stake; thence continuing N. 3 ®' 0' E¢ 64 ft. to the center of Mcf asaai Street; thence with the mearlderings of b4cGowan Street, in a northwesterly direction to pointers in A.T. Wright's South property line; thence with the South property line of A.T. Wright, Mi-Lier and 0. 4 Nbods, S. 890 30' W. 3,017 feet to the BLMNNING and containing 111.5 acres, mre or less, according to the survey and plat of F.M. Carlisle, made A=il 3, 1351, entitled "Property of Nathaniel Suitt and wife," recorded in Plat Book 4, at page 165, Orange County Fagistt-y. 6, It 1".c I �1 7, c In., A.— F.I., S. I e 157 " 1 1 BocK 504 FADE 533 >� The property hereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by instrument recorded is ...._ ............... � . 1 92 _.. 2- ... - -_ -�. at Pace. � :......................:................................................................_...................._............._.. ............._................_ _.....__.... ..._.. A map showing the above described property is recorded in Plat Book ... ............4.................. page......165 TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging. to the Grantee in fee simple. And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises is fee simple, has the right to convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all persona whomsoever except for the exceptions hereinafter stated. Title to.the property hereinabove described is subject to the following exceptions: Easements, restrictions and rights-of-way of reoord and 3.984 ad valarm taxes. 1 U4 tvrrxass wnatet or. the Grantor has herotmto sat his band and "al. or tl corPersts. 1122 caused this Instrument to be sign" to .ite corponita uams by Its dull anthorIzed aftlean and its seer to be Ii failure atlixed by orttr er it. Hearn of Dtnewra. We a.Y and Year tins+ above written. • --- - - - - -- -- -• _._.. - , •---- �.� -.-- (SEAL) -- "--- •_"'._...- LEA V. (Corporate Name) sr•. -----.— --- ---- °-- --- ---- - -- °---=--------- ----- x- �-_ --=t =� ---- - -'- - ------ -tsswn) Z f JUDY ti7 5L•I•ILE --- ------ -------- ----------President a , -- --r - -. (SEAM ATTESTS - --- •- -- -- ------------- -"_ . --------------------------- -- ------ -- --------- - -- - - - --- .---- •-- ---- -_ W _-- seentary (Corporate Seal) W -- __-- -- (sEA ) ._- ; - __--- --- ----- ---- ----- -- ---- SZAL- STAb1P U u NORTH cAROLniA, _ L9.x: ----.--- ------ COUDW- 1, a Notarry�rPublic of the County add state afofewd, carder %bat --- j:¢-- ' "-- ' V VL/.L H. SETITIaE ------ ---- --- ».... Dredtot u C7 Der+anlnr apposed batoeo me this day and aakhewl�4 _ a exeeutrod of the foregoing tostrnmedt. Wlmaes my dalof : __ - -_ __-. -- . - - ---. 18 hand and official SUMP or seal- W n re �11� Notary Pdblia ety commission explress NORTH CAROLINA,-------------- — ------------------ County. 1, a Notary Public of the County and Soto ate[esatd, terttt! that - -- - - . secretary of c personally came before me this day and a th ekdowledred at Is -- ------------ --- -- - - - - -- -- a North Corolla& Corporation, and that by authority d"T ---------------•---- h.- - -• -- -- -- u mgiven and as the act of ths• corporation- the foiefalni instrument was signed In 14 name Y .._--- --- - - ^- $ President. sealed with its corporate "21 and &nested by --- As Its _- ---- - --- ---- - -•_-- secretary. wltaefs m7 hand and official stamp or tasl. this __ --.day of ---------- ------------ -», 19_- .- __- __-- -- - -- Notary Pubtld my commission taP4est ________________ . ----------------------------------------------------- Thp foregoing CertiliC11411A) of _____ ______ ________ ___ ^ Not ---- - - - ---- -------------- -------- —°- ----------------------------------- 1 s------------------------------------------- the tSfACC certified to be correct This insUument and this certificate are duty date 'ad Hayes, and In the Book and Pate shown en tint pace hereof. Orange This he 1st day of. Mar., 1985. - - - -- ........ REGISTER OF DEEDS FOR ------------------- — ----- - - ------- covNTT --- -- ---- -- -- - --- •yepusy/Asclstant- ReC1aMe of Deeds BY - V.C. liar Assoc. Form No. 7 m 1976. Reeked 1777. - �.N 4 Ar.• -ee -A LM N C. 4. A..� •IMI. rOOU PR:Nn"O CO_ ING r.o &Ca t,ya NALMOK MG Mrs 5h ka- r 0— - T4AT5 IF I L 3g N i I' U, F. A. ........ . .. Smflh I otlrlI:"' a S HIN A Nk-Nim', N. C. 27MI, J,'XdFr TRX 901 vtrE 453 FLED "11 "Xxxx9W 453 `BAR P 42 PM i91 ltccordprlgl Time, Bm)k on(j page Tax J,ot N.. 17'allel lderltifi q �, N.. C 0 Verified by C011aty nn the day of Mail After recording to M. ElliliS 7309 Big Hurn si�.xDrougj W_ 27278 This instrlarnent was prepared lay �z� el W. Set-t e, P A. .. ......'.....,., ^... NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY'DEED THIS DEED made thia 1501 day of Ch 91 19 11111'', by alld betweell GRANTOR GRANTEE RUBY FAYE HUVr Al2�1,IA M. ENNIS A)(- Bk: RB901 P9: 453 ;),/ I Ai! ➢ ()�') 1 1/2 Enter its appropriate block for each party: llartic, atpllrv%K, NMI, It Appru'PrIrtle, character of elltity, e, carjlorAtln;j or partnership. Tho delivilation Grantor and C rarrCv,i as "Sed herein Shn1l iTlcldde said parties, then" ] (!h's, 8UcccSsorq, and a 43 i� ns, a n shall incIllde Singular, phuramasculine, e, fUlld"ile Or neuter aq requirvd by Context. 1V1'l'NFSSE'rjj, that the G"hiltor, for s Valimb.", coludderation Paid lr�y the tile Acknowledged, has and by these pr�esepj_4 r Tvcvipt of which - is hereby d'" Fropt, sell and convey unto the Gl'sotee in fee girople, III that certaill lot or parcel of land 4ituatf!d in (11 leell F" (h"arGe N("tb t'Alrolirla and more partiCUIArly de4cril I led I as folim 's 11 Township, County, A certain tract or parcel. of land lying and Being in Cjl(,2ejs Township, Orange County, ilclrth Carolina and: Containing 111.5 acres, more or less, according to the survey and plat of F.M, Carlisle, made April 3, 1951, elltitled "Property of Nathaniel Silitt and wife", recorded in Plat Book 4, at Page 165, Orange County Registry, the same being incorporated herein by reference. There is included ill this conveyance a right Of way granting right of ingress, egress and regress, over and upon the property hereinafter described to-wit: Twenty-five (25) feet on either side of the following described line, Lo-wit: BEGINNING at an iron stake in the center little of NCSR 1306 (Lebanon Road) , Said --take being located S. 82 deg. 121 1711 E. 250 ft. from an iron stake which is located at the northeast corner of Wedgewood Subdivision; said Beginning poil-It also located N. '2 deg. 121 1711 1q. 458.75 ft, from the northwest corner of Weldon Wright property, (Lot No. 2) , as shown in Plat Book 7, at Page 52, Orange Cck"ItY Registry; running thence S. of deg, 231 1411 E. approximately 2500 ft. to the western Nathaniel S line of the Suitt property as S:-icwn in Plat Bock, 4, at Page 165, Orange County Registry. Gllllldlfl!IIIIIINIV� IdVINd'II!Ilillllllll 144 _ v� O�UU0HNN0�iU|HU�0 NUU�|�|�U0|� ommmmmmmm�xm/mo�mmnww/�uwmu/v* ' 9Q1 -454 1/2 The property hereinabove deseribed wnq acitilirul by Grantor by instrument recorded in Anmn oho"mu a~ ")or ueu,/uu propinty M re°°`e(l �, Plat Book '-' vAr« ' ru yAvu AND TO ouuo the "u"ea"m lot or parcel of lama ^^u all ,"u ^mprt,e^m"Ce^ thereto oamminv to [lie omo,ee/nm°,/"p/°. � And the Grantor covenants wiffi the Cralitee, that Graritor ie seized of the prenflies ill fee / the fliflit to e(mve)l the 5mne in fee Simplel that title is marketable and free and cleal. of vill em" ki 111bra liceg, and that NYM wilvi'lint and defend the title u*uinst the lawful a=/moof all p"rs""m°u="niomer except for the ^xc°nu""au"*mu.ter"uonL ! Title mthe property xer*�* ^," aesu,/bNl is subject to the mxmw"o exwnu*. : aLA)jec, »o az' rent,c ctl Otis, easeumLs amu oqmis of way of record, if aor, w y/����,��������"h�� �� all , C2 ^���.�,i�~�,.� & Na e)_-_-___. � .- / � ���� �murt(Si»tjlc) try: ....... __—_------ _—__— ------- _� � *'"^ ATTE ST. � --____------- _----- ---------- _-ppyw -----_--_----___—_--_ � -----_—__-5—"'^�^~�`�, � � w � --------- -----------"°"* Nil It CAROLINA, t 15Lh March MY A � [� |/ || ' ^ ' °"^^~=NI, :°"m '^."m."". .",°", ", --� —' 'I ' --� ' I I — —' — .^u^^w,"m"mm,o~"* =^ w+ ,^r—l". ~°* °^ _ --' .*"."�~..�^~",mu*°,""~*".~��" w~m .~. ~ by." '' -~"".~.*~ """°^'=~"'^-*^~ w----- "x~` ~,m." and utfviat ^..,°"",.w—'-*°~— ' --� --.19— —� "=°° ' ' ---� — —� N.^,"ubfir ~* * �Kris L. Hubbard, a Notary Public of /Vara^o* COwnty^ N. C. ^u� . � ,°..^ `^. ..^..~,. .� ~^ ~.m`.° ," "*, ,."^~=." .�*° .,.,1 1"", °w ~ .� �k =^,^'^°~ ~ .� This the 18tb day of March, 1991 Orange ....... ... "°vms 146 20 4033=00'51790 DEED Bk;RS5770 ls`9;504 03139Mt4 04 23 43 PM 1J2 FILED Deboralh 6 Brooks Register, of Do&& Orange r.,j,NC#1 Rocor a ine. Farm Do , . R 0 NC Flame t t X $173.00 THI'S DEED, MADE AND ENTERED INTO THIS THE 8i ( DAY OF MARCH, 2014. BY ANU BETWEEN IN OWN= 10 010 0" PARTY OF THE FIRST PART AND EXCISE TAX: A 173,00 ALANA ENNIS 42,09 Pin Oak Drive Durlivu, 11oth C;arolisq 27707 Containing .85 acres and being designated as "Area C," as shown on PlIat of Survey titled "Recombination Property Surveyed for Alana Ennis," dated _, by Alois Calliemiyn and duly recorded in the Orange County Registry at Plat Book WL , Page The aforesaid .85 acres shail be merglied with existing tract; together with a perpetual right �—fingress, egress and regress ?rIong a 50 private right • way as shown on said plat. I , 11 1 a 147 (SEAL) MV70 505, 212 KIMB,EF>tY ANN VINCENT (SEAL) (SEAL) KEN NETHR. LEATRICE WOODS STATE OF Ni RTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF ORANGE 1, Barbara A. Merri t t A NOTARY PUBLIC OF SAID COUNTY, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT KIMBERLY ANN! VIN6EN�T, GRANTOR, PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFOR OWLEDIGED THE DUE EXECUTION OF THE FOREGOING DEED WITNESS MY HAND AND NOTARIAL SEAL, THIS THE 31 DAY OF March 2014. NO, ZA it y pu -4 / C (&AL) NOTARY PUB'L v �ouo; MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 9-1-1-7 P, R A A UEAL) NOTARY PUIWC -'30C' .; A Forest Stewardship Plan for the Property of Alana Ennis Prepared by Richard Sanders, NCRF 41564 January, 2013 Table of Contents Introduction 3 General Location and Property Description 3 Landowner Objectives 4 Forest Stewardship Resource Elements 20 Soil and Water 5 Biological Diversity 6 Aesthetic Quality 7 Recreation 8 Timber 8 Fish and Wildlife 9 Threatened and Endangered Species 10 Forest Health 11 Archeological, Cultural and Historic Sites 12 Wetlands 12 Fire 13 Carbon Cycle 14 Range /Silvopasture /Agroforestry 14 Forest Stand Evaluations and Recommendations Stand 1 16 Stand 2 19 Stand 3 20 Stand 4 21 Stand 5 23 Stand 6 24 Stand 7 25 Stand 8 28 Stand 9 30 Stand 10 30 Conclusion 31 Management Activity List 32 Stand Map 33 Soil Map 34 Appendix Material List 35 2 149 Introduction The Forest Stewardship Program is a cooperative project between the USDA Forest Service and, for this property, the North Carolina Forest Service. The purpose of the program is to "enable active, long -term management of non - industrial private forestlands." The North Carolina Forest Service facilitates development of comprehensive multi- resource management plans to assist landowners in managing their property for multiple objectives. Forest Stewardship Plans motivate landowners to become more active in planning and managing their forests, greatly increasing the likelihood that their forests will remain intact, productive and healthy, and that the social, economic, and environmental benefits of these lands will be sustained for future generations. tmardship FOREST This Forest Stewardship Plan was prepared, with funding through The Eno River Association, for the property of Alana Ennis. The purpose of the plan is to provide an evaluation of the current condition of the property and recommendations for management action to best achieve the landowner's objectives. General Location and Property Description The subject property is located in western Orange County approximately two miles northwest of Efland, NC. The property consists of two parcels located to the east of Frazier Rd. with limited access off the end of Faye St., a private road. The property totals 114.175 acres, of which 92.3 are forested. The remainder is composed of cultivated fields, hayfields, and a small farm pond. The property encompasses land to the west of McGowan Creek including portions of a small unnamed tributary which flows east into the main channel. McGowan Creek is a tributary of the Eno River which joins the Little River, feeds Falls Lake, then forms the Neuse River. The elevation ranges from 636 feet above sea level where McGowan Creek leaves the property at the southeastern corner, up to 730 feet on a broad ridgetop on the northwestern corner. Generally the topography is gently rolling and slopes rarely exceed fifteen percent. The exception to this rule is a limited area of land paralleling the main channel of McGowan Creek, where the land drops sharply to the floodplain and slopes up to fifty percent are present. 3 150 Landowner Objectives Forest management objectives are the overarching goals that the landowner wishes to work towards. Setting realistic and well - defined objectives is the first step in determining the direction that management will take. Ms. Ennis' objectives include: 1) Protection and enhancement of soil and water resources: Growing trees almost always improves soil tilth, stability, water holding capacity, and fertility. Threats to soil and water quality most often occur during or after poorly executed forest management practices as erosion from forest roads, chemical run -off, compaction from logging equipment, or damage to stream banks. Protecting soil and water through the implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) and thoughtful harvest planning can reduce negative impacts on and off the property and is an important consideration with any management activity. 2) Generation of income from sound silvicultural practices: Long -term forest management for income not only includes the planning of timber harvests, but also the implementation of strategies for promoting the most profitable species for each site and controlling competing species that may reduce stem quality and growth rates in crop trees. Frequently seen only as a source of income, well planned harvesting operations often present the best opportunities to achieve other forest management objectives as well. 3) Conservation of open space through the sale of development rights: Conservation of working lands is important for the long -term prosperity of our region. As more and more productive farm and forestland is converted to residential or commercial uses, the remaining lands become more critical both for the environmental services they provide and their contribution to the rural economies that the region depends on. For the private landowner, conservation frequently means making a personal commitment to maintain their property in an agricultural or forested state. This commitment can often be leveraged to generate cost -share assistance from government agencies, income from NGO's for the purchase of development rights, or to take advantage of tax incentives. 4) Facilitate the use of permaculture concepts: Permaculture is a system of ecological design that builds on the relationships between living things to create low maintenance horticulture systems modeled on natural ecosystems. In essence, permaculture is applied ecology with a focus on achieving productive and stable systems to sustain human life. Many permaculture writings focus more heavily on food production than on timber production, but the principles are transferrable. Experimentation with production models is completely compatible with the other management objectives and almost unlimited opportunities are present on this property for agroforestry, forest gardening, and production of non - timber forest products. 5) Maintenance and improvement of wildlife habitat: Healthy, well managed forests provide habitat for a wide variety of game and non -game wildlife species. In central North Carolina, common species include white - tailed deer, wild turkey, woodcock, bobcat, beaver, as well as many species of woodpeckers, waterfowl, raptors, songbirds, small mammals, reptiles, amphibians, insects and other invertebrates. Typically, F. 151 manipulation of the plant communities to provide a high diversity of habitats is a good strategy for accomplishing this objective. If aparticular species is of concern, forest management can be tailored to provide the necessary elements for that species. 6) Family legacy: Including family legacy as a management objective exemplifies American tradition and sustainable forestry. Throughout history, property owners have gained immeasurable satisfaction from living, working, and playing on their own land. Ensuring that this satisfaction is transferrable to the next generation requires that current management decisions do not forfeit future potential for short term gains. Just as important as managing for long -term productivity is cultivating in future landowners a connection to, and a sense of responsibility for the property. Forest Stewardship Resource Elements The following thirteen (13) natural resource elements are addressed in all Forest Stewardship Management Plans when they are present and /or applicable to the landowner and the management of their property: This portion of the document provides information on the 13 required Forest Stewardship Program natural resource elements. This plan may not address one or more of these resource elements if they were not observed on the property or were not identified as one of the land owner's management objectives. For more information, contact the author of this plan or local NC Forest Service (NCFS) office. Additional information and brochures may be available through NCFS offices or at: htlp://www.ncforestservice.gov/publications.htm Soil and Water Soil fertility is of major importance when it comes to forest management. Just as fertile soil is needed to produce high quality agricultural crops, specific soil conditions are required to grow good quality timber stands. Soil requirements vary by tree species and in the forestry field, soil productivity is expressed as "Site Index." Site index (SI) is the measure of height growth in a tree species over a 25 or 50 -year period. Soil type and conditions will influence management strategies and production potential. It is important to understand the nature of a tract's soils, as their characteristics may require different types of management. Information on local soils and accompanying data can be found on the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) website: ham: / /soils.usda. ov/ All forestry activities must protect water quality and comply with, among others, the North Carolina Forest Practices Guidelines Related to Water Quality (FPGs). Refer to the following website on FPGs: htlp:Hncforestservice.gov /publications /Forestry %20Leaflets /WQ01.pddf . NCFS personnel can perform FPG site inspections upon request. Additionally, the state and some local governments have also established rules to protect vegetated riparian buffers found along streams, rivers, and reservoirs in various parts of North 5 152 Carolina. Refer to the following website to view these buffer rules: htlp:Hncforestservice.gov/water quality /buffer_rules.htm 153 This plan will address the water bodies that should be protected during forest management activities. This may include the establishment of streamside management zones (SMZs), which are meant to prevent sedimentation and maintain healthy water temperatures. Proper pre - harvest planning prior to cutting timber can help ensure protection of both soil and water resources. Information on forestry activities and water quality issues can be found on the NCFS website: http://ncforestservice.�zov /water qualit /y water quality.htm Soil and Water on This Property: The majority of the soils on the property consist of well - drained clay and silt foams in the series Georgeville, Cecil, Enon, and Herndon. Many of these soils have been heavily impacted by agricultural use over the last few centuries. Most of the upland areas are best suited to production of a mixture of pine and upland hardwood tree species. The creek bottoms and floodplains are dominated primarily by Chewacla series loam. In general, these soils are somewhat poorly drained, moderately deep, and highly productive. Wetness and occasional flooding limited agricultural use of these areas in the past, but evidence of timber harvesting during wet conditions is evident in some areas where rutting has occurred. The Chewacla soils are best suited to production of hardwood tree species including tulip poplar, bottomland oaks, sycamore, elm and black walnut. The major hydrologic features on the property include: McGowan Creek, a small unnamed tributary of McGowan Creek, and a small farm pond located at the head of the tributary. The waterways have been dammed extensively by beavers which have several lodges on the property. The majority of McGowan Creek is impounded into several ponds and the lower portion of the tributary is heavily impounded as well. Where the creek bottoms are narrower and beaver activity is not influencing hydrology, many of the stream banks are steep and incised. This degradation is a result of past agricultural practices. Nonetheless, the hydrologic function of the property is largely intact and with good planning, negative off -site impacts can be avoided. Biological Diversity Biodiversity is the variety of life (including diversity of species, genetic diversity and diversity of ecosystems) and the processes that support it. Landowners can contribute to the conservation of biodiversity by managing for a diversity of habitats. It is important to select management options that offer the greatest opportunities for promoting wildlife habitat and conserving biodiversity while fulfilling other land ownership objectives. Some of these options include, but are not limited to: 1. Managing stand -level habitat features. 2. Promoting aquatic and riparian areas. 3. Managing landscape features. 4. Conserving rare species and communities. 5. Protecting special features and sites. 6. Developing partnerships with natural resource agencies and conservation organizations. For more information on managing for biological diversity, refer to the following website: httD: / /www.fs. fed. us /ecosystemservices /biodiversitv.shtml Biological Diversity on This Property: Cropland, pasture, wetlands, riparian areas, and multiple ages of mixed species forest provide a mosaic of habitats on this property. Because of this diversity in both landforms and land -uses, this property has the potential to support a wide range of species and communities. Protection of riparian areas, ponds, and active beaver populations will help protect biodiversity, wildlife habit, soil and water resources, and aesthetics simultaneously. This combined with forest management that attempts to maintain high productivity, mixed species stands, and multiple stages of stand development, will likely increase the species and community richness on the property. Aesthetic Quality By definition aesthetic quality (pleasing in appearance) means different things to different people. It can be anything from buffering a timber harvest from a busy road to managing for an open forest understory that is enjoyable to walk through. There are numerous management techniques that may be employed to achieve the landowner's desired level of aesthetic quality and many are discussed at the following websites: • www.ncrs.fs.fed.uL/gubs/viewpub.asp?key=4866. • htip:Hncforestservice.gov/fsandfl/stewardship aesthetics.htm Aesthetic Qualities on This Property: The pastoral and wooded setting, well buffered from surrounding roads and residential development define the aesthetics for this property. Highlighting the diversity of habitats and the working landscape, while avoiding the negative visual impacts of forest management operations, will be the challenge. Visual disturbances can be mitigated by reducing the size of major canopy disturbances, buffering higher use areas from timber harvests, and feathering the edges between different land -uses. Some management operations may disturb the aesthetic qualities in the short term, but will improve aesthetics and meet other objectives over time. VA 154 155 Focusing on management of the edges between forest and agricultural land will improve aesthetics and mitigate future disturbances. Managing these edges using permaculture principles can also help to create a transition zone between agricultural and potential residential areas of the property. Many species of native trees and shrubs that provide benefits such as showy flowers, brilliant fall colors, or evergreen foliage are already present in the forest or commercially available. These species could be favored or planted along edges to improve aesthetics and ease transitions. Recreation Management practices which enhance recreation opportunities may be easy to implement depending on the types of forest - oriented recreational activities valued by the landowner. For tips on recreational management visit the following websites: • Birding website (Partners in Flight): ham:// faculty. ncwc. edu /mbrooks /t if /bird %20profiles /bird profiles.htm • Trail construction /maintenance: Recreation Opportunities on This Property: Numerous possibilities to facilitate recreational use of the property are present. The most obvious step that could be taken in the short term is to construct a network of trails that provides access to the woodland and allows the landowner and other users to more easily visit and monitor the majority of the property. Trails following the western bank of McGowan Creek and the northern bank of the drainage flowing from the farm pond would be an easy initial development. Depending on future needs or wishes, additional trails could be constructed that access the southern portion of the property. A trail system would provide a backbone for development of other recreational opportunities such as picnicking areas, bird watching or wildlife viewing. Timber The Forest Stewardship Program assists landowners in sustainably managing their forest so they can be productive, vigorous and healthy. The type of management your forest will require is based on your management objectives, site capabilities and current condition of the forest. This plan will recommend practices to regenerate or initiate, tend, and harvest timber consistent with the long term objectives. The land units used for timber management are called stands. In some cases stand boundaries are clearly defined on the ground, particularly when an even aged stand developed naturally on an old agricultural field or when a uniform site was planted to a stand of loblolly pine. In other cases, where topography and soils are more variable and the impact of human activity less intense, species composition changes gradually and stand boundaries are less easily defined. For the purposes of this plan, stand boundaries were determined by slope, soils, species composition, access, and tree ages, and were mapped using 2010 aerial photographs and the Orange County GIS system parcels layer. Timber on This Property: Much of the property is very well suited for timber production. The soil types and conditions on the majority of the upland sites lend themselves to production of pine and mixed hardwoods depending on slope position and aspect. The more concave sites and creek bottoms will be most productive growing stands of bottomland hardwoods and species that can tolerate a high water table. Much of the property was heavily cutover in the late 1990's. Following this timber harvest, a site prep burn was conducted to remove logging slash and facilitate artificial regeneration of loblolly pines, which were planted around 1999. The pines have performed well on the higher and drier sites, but competition from less desirable species is inhibiting growth in many of the wetter areas. Some older trees on the property include those left around the old homesite, a narrow and patchy buffer along the riparian areas, and residual timber where quality was somewhat poorer. A few small areas of older pines remain along the northern boundary of the property. For this property, timber management will be focused primarily on the upland sites with rotation lengths between 30 and 60 years. The emphasis in these areas will be on restoring mixed species stands, cultivating the current timber crop to ensure success of desirable species, and maintaining high growth rates. These upland areas represent the greatest potential for income generation on the property and this income can be used to drive sustainable management on the entire property. Some timber harvesting, during management activities in the upland stands, may be recommended in the other areas to achieve the other objectives for the property. Fish and Wildlife Fish and other aquatic species depend on healthy water quality and quantity. Forest management decisions have a direct impact on both of these. Proactive and positive things landowners can do include establishing streamside management zones (SMZs), preventing or mitigating sources of sedimentation, and leaving un -mown areas around ponds. Landowners that have water bodies present on their property may contact various natural resource professionals to obtain technical assistance on improvement, aquatic maintenance, and fish stocking. Visit the following website for information on pond management and fishing opportunities: ham: / /www.ces.ncsu.edu /nreos /wild /fisheries /mgl_ide /chapterl .html Forestry activities and how they relate to water quality are discussed at: http:// ncforestservice.�zov /waterquality/water quality.htm G 156 An explanation of streamside management zones is located at: http:/ /www.woodlandstewardseries.com/ landowner - information - for - managing- woodland / documents/ ExplainingStreamsideManagementZones .pddf 157 Wildlife has four basic requirements: food, cover, water and space. Different wildlife species require different stages of forest growth to meet these needs. For example, quail and partridge feed on seeds of annual and perennial weeds and grasses that occur in young stands of timber, where sunlight reaches the forest floor. This is early successional habitat. Pileated woodpeckers depend on dead and rotting trees found in mature forests. This is late successional habitat. Still other wildlife prefer mid - successional habitat. Several factors determine how many species a forest can support - plant cover, harvest operations, water resources and topography. Many properties may have woodland, streams, swamps, rivers, ponds, and areas that adjoin fields, pastures, roads and other openings. Managing these "edges" is crucial to abundant populations of some wildlife species. The relationship between vegetation management and wildlife species habitat is well established. Understanding relationships is the first step in determining how property can be managed to promote the intended species. For more information on managing fish and wildlife and ponds contact a Forest Stewardship Biologist at http://ncforestservice. Gov /fsandfl /stewardshii) contacts.htm or visit the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission webpage: ham: / /www.ncwildlife.org/ Wildlife on This Property: As noted earlier, many habitat types are represented on the property and thus a high diversity of animal species inhabits the property as well. Several effective strategies that will maintain and enhance wildlife species on this property include: - Managing for edge habitat with irregularly shaped harvest areas - Maintaining scattered older mast producing trees across the forest - Protecting the pond, riparian buffers, and beaver populations - Cultivating soft mast producing species in the forest gardens and permaculture areas - Reducing the mowing cycle to three years in some areas - Attempting to maintain a mixture of young, middle -aged, and old timber stands Threatened and Endangered Species The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program provides information on state and federal threatened and endangered (T &E) plants and wildlife, habitats of particular conservation concern, and stewardship actions designed to benefit these important natural resources. The site has an online mapping tool, "The Virtual Workroom ", that can provide geographic information on T &E species and natural communities of concern that are within a 2 -mile radius of a specified location. A searchable database that can provide county -level and US Geological Survey (USGS) information is also available. The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program lists T &E species information at the following websites: 10 • htip://www.ncnhp.org/Pages/helitagedata.html • http: / /www.ncnhp.or /Pales/i4uide.htm • http: / /www.ncnhp.or /Images/ 2010 %20Rare %20Animal %20List.pdf Threatened and Endangered Species on This Property: A comprehensive assessment of threatened and endangered species populations was not conducted during the site visits for this Forest Stewardship Plan. During the evaluation of the property, no known endangered or threatened species were found. Forest Health A healthy forest is a forest that possesses the ability to sustain the unique species composition and processes that exist within it. The health of our forests must be maintained to ensure the survival of plant and animal species that make the forest their home, and to protect those processes that maintain a healthy environment. A healthy forest must also be able to accommodate the present and future needs of people for a variety of values, products, and services. Forest health protection issues are often directly related to the active management of insects and diseases, invasive plants and wildfire. Yearly inspections for signs of insects, diseases or invasive plant infestations should be completed by the landowner. More forest health information can be found on the following websites: www.forestt�ests. http://www.fs.fed.us /foresthealth/ htlp://www.fs.fed.us /r8 /foresthealth/ httD://ncforestservice.uov /forest health /forest health.htm Forest Health on This Property: Some losses due to insects and disease are normal throughout a forest's development, but in many cases management action is necessary to prevent insects, disease, or invasive plant species from greatly reducing the forests ability to realize the landowner's objectives. Over the next several decades invasive plant species and southern pine beetle will probably pose the greatest threats to forest health. Non - native plant species threaten forest productivity across the continent and the problem is causing environmental and economic damage on a rapidly growing number of acres every year. Invasive plant species, once established, are capable of severely inhibiting natural regeneration, out - competing native tree species, and in some cases killing mature stands of timber. The best method to protect the long term productivity of the property from this threat is to monitor for and control invasive species infestations aggressively before they become well established. Specific species will be addressed later in the plan. Southern Pine Beetle is an insect native to North Carolina that has become the most important insect pest for management of southern pines. The species is always present in areas where pines are growing, and under normal conditions trees' natural defenses prevent large scale mortality. When conditions are dry, growth rates are low, or stem densities are high, Southern 11 158 159 Pine Beetle infestations can become severe and widespread, killing pines on several hundred acres at a time. The best way for landowners to prevent large scale Southern Pine Beetle damage is by maintaining vigorous growth through all stages of stand development. Typically, a pre - commercial thinning by age fifteen, and commercial thinnings around ages twenty and thirty, will offer the remaining trees the resources necessary to keep their natural defenses high. Government cost share is frequently available for completion of pre - commercial thinning in plantations that meet certain criteria. Archeological, Cultural and Historic Sites Cultural resources refer to landscapes, structures, archeological artifacts, and vegetation that represent a culture or society. These remains are pieces of history that can provide a glimpse into the technology, culture, and environment of earlier societies and reveal much about our country's origins and development. Make sure you alert your forester or ranger to any such sites as they begin to develop your Forest Stewardship Plan. If you have specific questions about such sites, it may also be possible to work with a trained expert from the North Carolina Cultural Resources staff. It is especially critical to understand where such sites may be located prior to conducting ground disturbing projects. Information concerning Archeological, Cultural and Historic sites can be found at these websites: • ham: / /www.ces.ncsu.edu/ forestry /resourcesTublications /documents /won45.pdf • North Carolina Cultural Resources (ham:/ /www.ncdcr.gov/) • North Carolina Office of Archives and History htlp://www.history.ncdcr.gov/ / Archeological Cultural and Historical Sites on This Property: A comprehensive assessment of archeological, cultural, and historical sites was not conducted during the site visits for this Forest Stewardship Plan. There is clear evidence of past agricultural use, and an area that was probably an old homesite was noted near the center of the property. This area will be addressed in more detail later in the plan. Wetlands Wetlands are highly productive areas for timber production, water quality protection, wildlife habitat, and aesthetics. Due to their wet - natured soils and unique species composition, these ecosystems need to be managed carefully to maintain the full breadth of benefits that they provide. Some of the forestry activities done on "high ground" may still be carried out in wetland areas, but others practices may not. It is the responsibility of the landowner to understand the regulations related to forestry before engaging in forestry practices or contracting with a forest management service to work on their land. This can seem a daunting responsibility, especially when it comes to wetland areas, but many resources are available to answer questions. The NCFS; private consulting foresters; the NC Forestry Association; and the NC Forestry Extension Program can be good sources of information on allowable forestry practices in wetlands. The two primary agencies that regulate activities in wetlands are the NC Division of Water Quality and the US Corps of Engineers. More information on North Carolina wetlands, as well as forestry activities that may be carried 12 out in them, can be found at these websites: httD:Hdcm2.enr. state .nc.us /wetlands /brochure.htm httD:Hncforestservice.gov/Dublications/W_QO107/BMP chaDter06.pd f Wetlands on This Property: Wetlands area significant feature on this property. As mentioned earlier, the majority of McGowan Creek and the lower portions of the drainage from the pond are inhabited by American beavers. The construction of beaver dams back up water in these lower areas, raising the water table, and flooding large areas of the creek bottoms. These wetlands are helping to protect water quality in McGowan Creek and beyond, and are providing unique habitats for wetland plant communities as well as waterfowl and other wildlife species. Any management action on the property should be planned to minimize negative impacts to these areas. Equipment should be largely restricted from the creek bottoms except during very dry weather and access the southern portion of the property should be limited to one stream crossing at the narrowest point in the channel. A temporary bridge mat or a permanent culvert crossing, with a device to prevent blockage by beavers, should be used for equipment access. Fire Prescribed fire is the planned use of fire under pre - determined weather and fuel conditions to obtain specific management objectives. This is also known as "controlled" burning, and when done correctly it mimics the frequent burning that used to occur in NC naturally. Prescribed burning is a critical management tool that benefits North Carolina's forests, wildlife and overall environment. It also helps reduce the devastating impacts of uncontrolled wildfire hazards. Prescribed fire is especially important in North Carolina due to the large amount of land lying in the Wildland/Urban Interface (WUI). The N.C. General Assembly recognized the importance of prescribed burning in the NC Prescribed Burning Act, which may be reviewed at the following website: http: / /www.ncle�z. net /EnactedLe�zislation/ Statutes /PDF /BvArticle /Chapter ®106 /Article ®a0.pdf The NC Forest Service and its partners train, plan and coordinate with local fire services before a prescribed fire is started in order to ensure that all burning regulations are obeyed. There are also private contract burners that provide this service in various parts of the state. Additional information on prescribed burning may be found at: http://ncforestservice.�zov /Manama vour ® fore st /mana vour forest.htm ham: / /www.ces.ncsu.edu /forestry /pdf /ag AG- 616.pdf http: / /www.ncfirewise.gM/ htip:Hncforestservice.gov/fire control /fc_wui.htm Prescribed Fire Opportunities on This Property: Historically, the upland areas of the property may have burned naturally, or as a result of human activities, every 5 -15 years. Many ecologists attribute the decline of oak - hickory -pine forests in the Carolina piedmont to the disruption of this fire regime for the last century. Recently prescribed fires have become an 13 160 accepted and valuable management tool to restore ecosystem processes. 161 Prescribed fire has the potential to provide many benefits on the upland portions of the property. Burning these mixed stands after the first commercial thinning would help to control undesirable native and non - native species, allow for development of grasses and herbaceous plants in the understory, promote development of oak and hickory regeneration, and improve wildlife habitat by providing sources of browse, soft mast, and cover on the forest floor. Carbon Cycle All forest plants and soils "store" carbon, so your management influences the natural cycles of that storage in both living and dead plant material. The removal of carbon from the atmosphere is the process of carbon sequestration. Trees are roughly 50% carbon, based on dry weight. Certain forest management practices can promote more plant growth per acre. Timber harvests can lead to durable wood products that store carbon for long periods of time. Carbon sequestration rates can be increased by maintaining forest health, replanting areas that have been harvested and actively managing a dynamic growing forest. In recent years, programs dealing with "carbon sequestration ", "carbon credits" and "biomass" have been in the news. While the resulting financial benefit to forest landowners is still in question, this may still be a topic to watch. The amount of carbon credits on a property can be computed based on a forest inventory. Age, stocking levels, species and site index are factors that can affect this inventory. Many consulting foresters can complete the base -line inventory for an associated fee. Prior to engaging in carbon markets, landowners need to consider the commitment period, contracts, associated fees, market access, inventory methods, aggregators, certification programs, afforestation and required silvicultural treatments. More information on this topic can be found at: ham:/ /www.ces.ncsu.edu /forestry /programs /woody biomass /hubs and research.ph Carbon Cycle on This Property: At this time, opportunities to participate in carbon markets are limited for this property. As the climate change issue evolves in the future, opportunities may become more certain. Until then, sustainable forest management should be practiced for the multitude of other benefits it provides. Range /Silvop asture /Agroforestry Silvopasture dates back to when humans first started burning and thinning forests to promote forage for the animals they relied on for food. The practice is increasingly popular in the South as a way to supplement timber income on small pine plantations and some hardwood stands. Trees can provide longer -term returns from saw logs for lumber, while livestock in a rotational grazing system provides steady annual income. There can be, however, problems with combining the two management schemes if it is not done correctly. Before any new silvopasture 14 system is established, landowners should thoroughly explore the associated economic and environmental considerations along with local land use, zoning, cost -share program, and tax regulations. Forest and agricultural land may have separate zoning and land -use regulations accompanied by tax assessments. Environmental requirements (ex. planting trees, stream -side protection, and wildlife habitat maintenance) also may vary with land use. More information on silvopasture may be found at these websites: http: / / www.srs.fs.usda.gov/ compass /issuel5 /03pastures.html; ham:/ /www.srs.fs.usda.gov /compass /issuel5 /03tgp.html http: / /www.silvopasture.or Ddf_content /silvo ate sture handbook. df htlp://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/compass./issue15/03what.html Range /Silvopasture on This Property: At this time, livestock are not grazed on the property. If, the need to graze the woodland arises in the future, this issue can be addressed. 15 162 Forest Stand Evaluations and Recommendations Stand 1 Stand 1 is located on the northeast portion of the property between a 10 acre cultivated field, the riparian area along McGowan Creek, and the tributary flowing from the west. Located on top of a broad ridgetop, slopes are relatively gentle and rarely exceed 10 percent, except along the border with Stand 7 where they increase somewhat. Soils are Georgeville and Cecil series and were probably cultivated and grazed heavily in the past. The convex site and well drained, but somewhat degraded, soils are ideal for production of loblolly pine with associates of upland hardwoods. After a rotation of pine, site quality will probably improve to the point where a shift toward upland hardwoods can be considered. The fifty year site index for loblolly pine is 100 feet. This area was a hardwood stand that was clearcut in 1999, burned, and planted to loblolly pine immediately following the harvest. Overall, the pines have performed well, reaching heights of about 40 feet and diameters averaging 7 inches. Some mixed hardwoods are present in the canopy including white oak, willow oak, black oak, southern red oak, sweet gum, winged elm and red maple. Red mulberry, American holly, American beech, and Florida dogwood are present in the midstory. Along the edges with the field, many invasive plants are present, including, tree -of- heaven, common privet, Japanese stiltgrass, multiflora rose, and Japanese honeysuckle. Within the stand, tree -of- heaven and princesstree have reached the canopy and are producing seed and competing with more desirable species. Some damage to the pine stems on the southern boundary has occurred from the beaver populations in Stand 7. See Figure 1 16 163 Figure 1: Beaver damage on southern edge of Stand 1 Access to the stand is excellent from the field edge and slope will not limit management. The following table offers a general summary of the stand: 17 164 Stand Acreage: Site Soils: Slope: Aspect: Landform: Site Index: Vegetation Primary Tree Species: Secondary Tree Species: Stocking: DBH of timber species: Shrubs: Herbs: Vines: Advance Regeneration: Invasive Plants: Recommendations: Georgeville, Cecil 0 % -10% East Convex 100 for loblolly pine loblolly pine upland oaks, red maple fully stocked: 150 square feet per acre 7 sumac, blackberry (declining) grasses, forbs (declining) catbrier, grapes NA tree -of- heaven, princesstree, multiflora rose, Japanese The invasive trees in the canopy should be cut and the stumps should be treated with a 25% solution of a triclopyr herbicide to prevent resprouting. It is likely that after this treatment, little invasive species control will be necessary within the stand as the pines will probably shade out most of the species in the understory over the next several years. This can be completed in- house or a licensed pesticide applicator can be hired to do the work. In about 8 years or sooner if volumes allow, a commercial thinning should be conducted. Residual basal areas should be determined just before the thinning is conducted. This thinning will help to maintain high growth rates in the pines, and can also be used to promote hardwood mast producers in the canopy. This thinning, if marketed with pulpwood harvests and improvement work in other stands, should generate modest returns which could be used to finance stewardship work on other portions of the forest. This sale should be negotiated on a per unit basis with a reputable pulpwood buyer. After the first thinning, another thinning will probably be necessary around age thirty. . 165 Stand 2 166 Stand 2 is located on the southern portion of the property, to the west of McGowan Creek and to the south of the tributary. Slopes are relatively moderate, mostly under 10 percent and the landform is rolling, containing both concave and convex sites which face northeast. Soils are Georgeville series, and portions of the stand may have been cultivated in the past (but not to the extent as in Stand 1). Fifty year site index for loblolly pine is 90 feet. Like Stand 1, this hardwood stand was clearcut in 1999, burned, and planted to loblolly pine immediately following harvest. Hardwood stump sprouts have competed effectively with the pines in many areas and the hardwood species are playing an important role in the canopy in these areas. White oak, black oak, southern red oak, and hickories occupy the higher slopes, while tulip poplar, sweetgum and elm are competing on the wetter sites. The hardwood stems are typically between 3 and 5 inches DBH and multiple sprouts have grown from the cut stumps. Where pines are dominant, they have reached diameters averaging 6 inches. Access to the stand is limited by the required crossing of the riparian area. This limitation, along with the low pine volumes, may reduce options for management, especially improvement harvesting or commercial thinnings. The following table offers a general summary of the stand: Stand: 2 Acreage: 26 Age: Site Soils: Georgeville Slope: 0 -15% Aspect: northeast Landform: rolling: gentle ridges and drains Site Index: 90 for loblolly pine Vegetation Primary Tree Species: mixed oaks, tulip poplar, loblolly pine Secondary Tree Species: red maple, American beech, sweetgum, hickories Stocking: 120 square feet per acre DBH of timber species: 3 " -6" Shrubs: sumac, blackberry (declining) Herbs: grasses, forbs (declining) Vines: catbrier, grapes Advance Regeneration: NA Invasive Plants: multiflora rose, Japanese honeysuckle w Recommendations: If possible, the stand should be thinned in about 8 years along with Stand 1. If a timber crop worth managing can be cultivated in the pines, the pines and hardwoods can be more easily managed in the future. If commercial thinning is not economically feasible, one alternative is to complete a crop -tree- release treatment where desirable species of good stem quality are selected and released through mechanical removal of competing trees and vines. The treatment should select for loblolly pine and well - formed oaks on the upland sites and for loblolly pine and tulip poplar on the lower sites. Stump sprouts should be approached by removing all but the best quality stem. Ideally, this work could be completed in -house over several years. The other alternative is to allow this stand to grow on its own until enough volume is present to justify a commercial harvest. This may not be until the stand is thirty or forty years old, between the years 2030 and 2040. At this time a commercial removal of pine and hardwood pulp should be feasible if markets persist. Stand 3 This stand is located along both sides of the small tributary flowing from the pond on the west end of the property. Slopes are moderate, mostly under 10 percent and the landform is rolling, containing both concave and convex sites which face either north or south. Soils are primarily Georgeville series, but some Herndon soils are present on the western end. The soils have been used heavily in the past, both cultivated and grazed, though some areas were likely too wet for cultivation. The fifty year site index for loblolly pine is 90 feet. This stand was about 40 years old at the time of the last harvest, and probably established on an old pasture in the 1960's. A mixed stand of pine, sweetgum, and tulip poplar with a fairly diverse mid - story, the previous stand was nearly clearcut, burned, and planted to loblolly pine, like Stands 1 and 2. Some exceptionally poor quality residual stems were left standing along the field edges and on the wetter sites. The success of the pine has been patchy with pine density higher on the better drained sites, and lower elsewhere. To the south of the stream, white oak, southern red oak, maple and hickory are the dominant hardwoods and to the north of the stream, sweet gum, tulip poplar, red maple, and winged elm are dominant. Access to the stand is good except for the areas to the south of the stream. A temporary crossing on this stretch should not be difficult and if properly installed will have minimal impact on water quality. Wet soils in some areas will require limiting equipment use within the stand to dry weather. The following table offers a general summary of the stand: 20 167 Stand: 3 Acreage: Site Soils: Slope: Aspect: Landform: Site Index: Vegetation Georgeville 5 -15% south and north rolling: lower slopes and drains 90 for loblolly pine Primary Tree Species: loblolly pine, mixed oaks, sweetgum Secondary Tree Species: tulip poplar, red maple, hickories Stocking: 120 square feet per acre DBH of timber species: 3 -7" Shrubs: blueberry, blackberry Herbs: grasses and forbs (declining) Vines: catbrier, grapes Advance Regeneration: NA Invasive Plants: multiflora rose, Japanese stiltgrass, Japanese honeysuckle Recommendations: IM It is likely that portions of this stand can be thinned during the work in Stand 1, 8 years from now. Wherever economically operable, pine densities should be reduced to maintain high growth rates. Because the upland sites are more suited to timber production than the lower areas, it is important to produce a renewable timber crop where feasible to fund good management on the balance of the property. Stand 4 Stand 4 is the 8 acre riparian zone surrounding the tributary to the east of the pond. Slopes are gentle, rarely exceeding 5 %. Chewacla soils dominate the creek bottom, with a few areas where the upland soils extend into the stand as well. These areas were probably rarely cultivated, but livestock grazed the bottoms extensively in the past and the stream channel is somewhat incised in places. American beavers move up and down the stream channel and several old, filled -in ponds are present. An active population uses the area immediately below the farm pond heavily. Like Stand 3, 30 -40 year old timber was removed in the late nineties, but pines were either not planted or quickly died in the wet soils. The stand is dominated by hardwoods, mostly sweetgum, black willow, tulip poplar, eastern sycamore, red maple, and occasional oaks. Timber production potential in this area is low because of beaver damage, high densities of low value species, and an abundance of vines in the canopy. 21 The stand is providing excellent wildlife habitat. The beaver activity provides a constant supply of young tree sprouts and several areas of open, grassy cover. Common cattails, rushes, sedges, and bunch grasses are all present to varying degrees. Many of the older trees left along the stream channel are providing den sites, feeding sites for insects and birds, and some canopy structure as well. Native grapes are common and an excellent source of soft mast within the stand. Smooth alder is scattered throughout the stand providing some winter food sources and good bank stabilization. Non - native species, Japanese stiltgrass and multiflora rose are both inhibiting growth of more desirable native plants, particularly where more sun is reaching the forest floor. The following table offers a general summary of the stand: Stand: 4 Acreage: Site Soils: Slope: Aspect: Landform: Site Index: Vegetation Primary Tree Species: Secondary Tree Species: Stocking: DBH of timber species: Shrubs: Herbs: Vines: Advance Regeneration: Invasive Plants: Recommendations: 8 Age: 14 Chewacla 0 -55 east concave: creek bottom 100 for tulip poplar sweetgum, tulip poplar, red maple winged elm, hickories, oaks 80 square feet per acre 3"-6" smooth alder grasses, sedges, rushes, forbs grapes, catbrier NA Japanese stiltgrass, multiflora rose Little action is necessary in the short term for this stand to continue providing its non - timber benefits. Roses could be removed from the stand using mechanical or chemical control, but the Japanese stiltgrass is not feasible to control. A trail following the southern stream bank east from the pond, crossing the stream at the approximate midpoint of the stand, and following the northern bank to the southern edge of Stand 1 would make an excellent route for easy hiking, viewing wildlife or wildflowers, or monitoring the property. 22 169 Stand 5 170 Stand 5 is 5 acres on the northwest property corner. The land slopes gently to the southeast with slopes to 10 %. Though the stand is small, the soils are diverse. It contains Herndon, Cecil, Appling, Enon, and Georgeville. The stand was probably cultivated in the past, was definitely grazed heavily, and has been abandoned for agriculture over the last 25 years. Trees established naturally on old pastureland beginning in the early nineties and a mixture of early successional hardwoods and pines have slowly colonized the site. The stand contains Virginia and loblolly pines between 6 and 14 inches DBH, sweetgum, tulip poplar, and black cherry between 4 and 12 inches DBH, and scattered eastern red cedar throughout. Goldenrod, broom sedge, and tall fescue are still present in some areas as well as scattered patches of blackberries. These areas of early successional habitat located close to the farm pond are used heavily by small mammals, birds, and insects. Multiflora rose, common privet, Japanese honeysuckle and Japanese stiltgrass are all present. The following table offers a general summary of the stand: Site Soils: Slope: Aspect: Landform: Site Index: Vegetation Primary Tree Species: 10 -25 diverse upland soils 0 -10% southeast gently rolling sideslope 90 For loblolly pine loblolly pine, Virginia pine, sweet gum Secondary Tree Species: tulip poplar, black cherry, eastern red cedar Stocking: Patchy, 50 -140 square feet per acre DBH of timber species: 4 -14 inches Shrubs: blackberry Herbs: fescue, broom sedge, goldenrod Vines: grapes, catbrier Advance Regeneration: NA Invasive Plants: Multiflora rose, Japanese honeysuckle, common privet Recommendations: This stand does not warrant intensive timber management. During future thinnings elsewhere on the property, Virginia pine and sweetgum could be removed from the stand as pulpwood which would create growing space for more desirable species, improving aesthetics and wildlife habitat. 23 If, during future farming or forestry activities, gaps of early successional habitat can be created or perpetuated by removal of timber, this should be considered. Another option may be using a heavy duty bush -hog. There are some younger patches within the stand that could be mowed once every three to five years. Stand 6 Stand 6 is 6 acres located on the northern portion of the property and includes the smaller parcel. Located on Georgeville soils on the top of the main ridge, slopes are nearly flat throughout. The fifty year site index for loblolly pine is 100. The stand is composed of two separate age classes of pine, but should be managed as one unit in the future. The northern portion is about thirty five year old planted loblolly that has never been thinned. The southern portion is about fifty years old and established on old fields, but was not cut during the last harvest. Diameters in the younger trees are between 7 and 16 inches and the older trees are between 14 and 20 inches. Understory and mid story hardwoods include red maple, sourwood, sweetgum, and tulip poplar. Figure 2: Stand 6 needs thinning 24 171 Except for Japanese stiltgrass, few invasive plants are present within the stand. The southern boundary, however, contains tree -of- heaven which will begin producing seed soon. The following table offers a general summary of the stand: Site Soils: Slope: Aspect: Landform: Site Index: Vegetation Primary Tree Species: Secondary Tree Species: Stocking: DBH of timber species: Shrubs: Herbs: Vines: Advance Regeneration: Invasive Plants: Recommendations: : 35 and 50 Georgeville 0 -5% NA convex: broad ridgetop 100 for Loblolly pine loblolly pine red maple, sweetgum, tulip poplar 200 square feet per acre 7" -20" NA grasses and forbs NA red maple, sweetgum tree -of- heaven, Japanese stiltgrass 172 If the small acreage is not a limiting factor, the stand should be thinned as soon as possible (see figure 2 above). Trees up to 12 inches should be removed from the northern portion, leaving mostly trees from 12 -16 inches with excellent form. The southern portion should be thinned for quality, removing the poorest quality trees. This thinning should be negotiated on a per unit basis with a reputable timber buyer. This thinning will allow for resumed diameter growth in the remaining trees and make a sale of mature sawtimber possible in about 15 years. Stand 7 Stand 7 is located along the eastern boundary of the property, following McGowan Creek and encompassing 13 acres of creek bottom land and the somewhat steeper land between the Georgeville and Chewacla soils. The site is extremely productive with a fifty year site index of 110 feet for tulip poplar. 25 What merchantable timber was present in the stand was removed in the late nineties with the exception of trees immediately adjacent to the stream channel and trees of exceptionally poor quality. The stand now contains two age classes of trees. The first is composed of larger residual trees, mostly between 80 and 100 years old, including tulip poplar, American beech, sweetgum and red maple. Where the land drops sharply to the creek bottom, older American beech, upland oaks, and tulip poplar are common with the more water tolerant trees growing adjacent to the streams. The younger cohort regenerated naturally after the last harvest and is now between 1 and 12 years old. 173 The beaver population in this stand is high and these animals are a major force of change here, actively expanding their territory and changing the vegetation and hydrology. Ponds, active and abandoned, are present throughout the stand (see figure 3 below). The active ponds are providing excellent habitat for waterfowl, fish, reptiles and amphibians. The abandoned ponds are becoming re- vegetated with diverse early successional wetland plant species and providing a unique cover type on the property, used by a wide variety of animal species. Figure 3: Active beaver pond, lodge in front left The beavers have recently cleared several areas on higher ground for food and materials, creating areas that are actively regenerating to hardwood stump sprouts, but also contain a diverse layer of more upland bunch grasses and forbs. Invasive plant species are playing a major role in the ecology of the stand, competing for growing space throughout the majority of the bottomland. Japanese stiltgrass has formed a dense mat over many of the recently flooded soils. Japanese honeysuckle is in the crowns of many of the younger trees and recent sprouts. Multiflora rose is present along the margins between the wetlands and uplands and is thriving in the high light environment. The following table offers a general summary of the stand: StandM9 Site Soils: Slope: Aspect: Landform: Site Index: e: 13 IF Chewacla 0 -50% east 1 -12 and 80 -100 concave: wide creek bottom 110 for tulip poplar Vegetation Primary Tree Species: tulip poplar, sweetgum, American beech, red maple Secondary Tree Species: black willow, hickory, box - elder, oaks Stocking: patchy, 0 -100 square feet per acre DBH of timber species: NA Shrubs: smooth alder, sumac, blackberry Herbs: rushes, sedges, grasses, forbs Vines: grapes, catbrier Advance Regeneration: NA Invasive Plants: Japanese stiltgrass, Japanese honeysuckle, ' common mullein Recommendations: The best use of this stand is as protected wetlands. The hydrology, unique plant communities, high wildlife value, and the soil and water quality protection attributes make leaving this stand largely un- managed a good option. Additionally, because of the dynamics of this ecosystem, with the changing water levels and the beaver impacts, investing in vegetation management is a highly uncertain proposition. Improving wildlife habitat with plantings, wood duck box installations, or invasive species control could be considered. Encouraging human use of the area through trail construction or installation of a bird blind for wildlife viewing is another option. Otherwise this stand should remain undisturbed. 27 174 Stand 8 Stand 8 includes four small areas located mostly along field edges where existing vegetation or other current conditions make good opportunities for installation of permaculture projects. The following is a description of each small area and initial ideas for development. a. This area is 0.7 acres located in a low wet spot that extends into the southwestern edge of the hayfield. The area was probably abandoned for hayfield because of wet soils which made mowing difficult. Hardwood tree species established in this area and most of these were harvested in 1999. The current stand contains high densities of sweetgum, but also scattered persimmon, pecan, and walnut. Removing all sweetgums, all invasive plant species, and cutting vines from the remaining trees would allow for these species to grow well and begin to produce fruit, probably within a few years. The wetter conditions in the understory would be good for berry production on the edges where more light is available and mushroom cultivation on the interior of the unit. b. This 0.9 acre area encompasses the southern portion of the old homesite. The location is relatively high and dry and centrally located. Several scattered older open - crown trees cover the majority of this area, including a 47 inch white oak, a 36 inch pecan with a large spreading crown, and a 36 in black walnut. Under the larger trees, a dense stand of tree -of- heaven has developed as well as smaller walnuts and pecans. The tree -of- heaven here needs to be removed. Mechanical removal of trees and stumps followed by frequent mowing would be effective if the area will be closely monitored and managed in the future. Otherwise, a cut stump treatment with a triclopyr based herbicide should be considered. This work will greatly improve the aesthetics in this highly visible area, preserve the integrity of the remains of the homesite, and facilitate future establishment of other productive trees and shrubs. W. 175 Figure 4: Stand 8b, large mast producers over tree -of- heaven midstory c. This 0.4 acre area is a small finger of hayfield surrounded by taller pines. This area might make a good place to establish a permaculture project beginning from something of a clean slate. The higher light environment would allow for quick establishment of a wide variety of crops. d. This is 0.2 acres of pure tree -of- heaven located on the southern edge of the cultivated field. Somewhat wetter soils, probably damaged during logging, allowed the species to quickly outcompete native tree species here after the last timber harvest. Intensive management will be necessary here to eliminate the threat posed by the tree -of- heaven. Establishment of a forest garden in this area would necessitate high labor inputs early on and would allow for removal of this forest health threat while simultaneously achieving the permaculture goal. WI-11 176 177 Figure 5: Stand 8d, pure tree -of- heaven. Stand 1 back left. Stand 9 This area includes a 12 acre hayfield (9a) and a 10 acre cultivated field (9b). Management of these units is not within the scope of this plan. Nonetheless, it should be noted that the invasive species issues on the property are spreading from the margins of the agricultural land. The ease of access and high visibility makes effective control within reach at this time. An investment now, removing seed producing populations first and moving towards eradication of the invasive trees will go a long way towards protecting the long -term productivity of the entire property. Stand 10 The farm pond, 2.5 acres, is a positive feature on the landscape that should be maintained and protected. Resources are available from NRCS, NC Cooperative Extension, and the NC Wildlife Resources Commission regarding management of farm ponds. 30 178 Figure 6: Farm pond with Stand 3 in background, smooth alder in right foreground Conclusion While there are numerous challenges to overcome, this property still maintains good potential to effectively meet Ms. Ennis' objectives. Generally the recommendations for the next twenty years are geared towards investments in forest health and improving long term timber potential. The diversity of this tract makes it feasible to manage for multiple objectives, none of which is mutually exclusive, and with proper management we can achieve the goals of protection of soil and water, timber income, conservation, permaculture, wildlife habitat, and family legacy. Cost -share opportunities are available for many of the recommended actions including wildlife habitat improvement, invasive species control, wetland management, and when the time comes, reforestation and pre - commercial thinning of pine stands. Before investing in any of these projects, the cost share opportunities should be researched. The Natural Resource Conservation Service, The North Carolina Forest Service, The Wildlife Resources Commission, and the Soil and Water Conservation District are all good sources of cost -share funding. 31 179 A consulting forester created this plan, and can assist with plan execution. Many actions can be completed or subcontracted by the landowner, but a consulting forester can contract for improvement work, invasive species control, tree and boundary marking, and ensure that harvesting operations are lucrative, silviculturally sound, and achieve the landowner's objectives. Forest management plans are working documents, recommending actions within the next decade or two to achieve results over the next century or two. This plan should be considered a proposal subject to change as objectives, conditions (environmental, economic and regulatory), and ownership change. Recommended management actions are outlined in the table below. Upcoming Forest Management 1 Cut stump treatment of invasive tree species 2013 -2015 First commercial thinning of loblolly pine 2020 -2023 Consider 2nd commercial thinning of loblolly pine 2030 -2033 2 Consider first commercial thinning of pine and hardwood or 2020 -2023 non - commercial crop - tree - release treatment or no action 3 First commercial thinning of loblolly pine 2020 -2023 Consider 2nd commercial thinning of pine and hardwood 2030 -2033 4 Consider trail construction 2013 -2020 5 Consider partial mowing every 3 -5 years Consider pulpwood harvest of Virginia pine and sweetgum 2030 -2033 6 Consider thinning if feasible 2013 -2014 7 Consider habitat improvement or trail construction 2013 -2020 8 Begin installation/maintenance of permaculture systems 2013 - ? ? ?? 9 Invasive species control 2013 - ? ? ?? 32 u, LL ,.� u V ) G Cl W�y � O�U ml :1 0 N M rl L1 P-.' ` . 0 M M WE aZ� �fY iL N rn N vv � N Q% U) Z IO CL -2 7 0 m C ^L V m CL T b CL a J U N U U n n � v a� G �r m = = = m m 181 LL � 1� 34 O a) a ('V ['7 0 cv a 0 Appendix Material List Silviculture Terminology A Management Guide for Invasive Plants in Southern Forests Timber Sales: A Planning Guide for Landowners The Southern Pine Beetle Prevention Program and You 35 182 Z 1� Engineers and Soil Scientists Agri -Waste Technology, Inc. 501 North Salem Street Suite 203 Apex, NC 27502 919 - 859 -0669 www.agriwaste.com Soil Suitabilityfor Domestic Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems Frazier Road PIN #9835945500, Mebane, NC Orange Count Prepared For: Ms. Alana Ennis, Owner XCOPY: Ms. Katy Ansardi, Hart's Mill Prepared By: Jeff Vaughan, Ph.D., L.S.S. Senior Agronomist/Soil Scientist Chris McGee, L.S.S. Associate Agronomist/Soil Scientist Julie Peele Environmental Technician Report Date: January 12, 2014 3 • m Z I yj Engineers and Soil Scientists Agri -Waste Technology, Inc. 501 North Salem Street Suite 203 Apex, NC 27502 919 - 859 -0669 www.agriwaste.com Soil Suitability for Domestic Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems Frazier Road, Mebane, NC (Orange County) PREPARED FOR: Ms. Alana Ennis, Owner XCOPY: Ms. Katy Ansardi, Harts Mill PREPARED BY: Jeff Vaughan Chris McGee Julie Peele DATE: January 12, 2014 Soil suitability for domestic sewage treatment and disposal systems was evaluated on January 2, 3, and 6, 2014, for property located on Frazier Road near Mebane, NC. Jeff Vaughan, Chris McGee, Trent Bostic, and Jesse Vaughan of Agri -Waste Technology, Inc. (AWT) conducted the soil evaluation. The detailed soil evaluation of the land area will follow. Property reference maps, provided by Ms. Katy Ansardi, are in Attachment 1. A review of the soil and landscape characteristics that dictate soil suitability for domestic sewage treatment and disposal systems can be found in Attachment 2. The total property area is approximately 112 acres, but only about 70 acres were evaluated. The property is partially wooded, partially in cropland, and partially in pastureland. There are numerous drainage features, a pond, 2 creeks, and a small structure on the property (Attachment 3). Soil Suitability for Domestic Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems The aerial maps in Attachment 3 detail the approximate property boundaries, soil boring locations, soil types, and soil areas for septic systems. Soil borings were flagged in the field with blue ribbon (24 "+ of provisionally suitable soil), blue /red ribbon (18 -23" of provisionally suitable soil), red ribbon (12 -17" of provisionally suitable soil), and yellow ribbon (less than 12" of provisionally suitable soil). Approximately 63 soil borings were advanced on the property and the soil examined (Attachment 3). A portion of the property contained drainage features, complex topography, vehicle paths, and /or unsuitable soils and, thus, are unsuitable for septic systems. However, this evaluation was merely a preliminary review to determine what potential this land might have for domestic sewage treatment and disposal systems. Therefore, specific types of septic systems, exact locations of future drainfields and repair areas, plus buffers from property lines (current and potential future lot lines), building foundations, wells, etc. are not fully 185 considered. These things will need to be more fully considered as the plans develop for the potential future of this site. It is likely that additional soil evaluations will be required once lot layouts are considered and developed for this property so that septic system types and the location of a septic drainfield can be more fully and appropriately considered. Two areas (see map in Attachment 3) exhibited soil characteristics and soil depths (24" or greater) that are provisionally suitable for conventional or shallow conventional trench septic systems. These areas are approximately 1,687,249ft2 and 32,147ft2, respectively. Typical profile descriptions of the provisionally suitable soil for this property are in Attachment 4. Two distinct soil profiles were observed in the soil borings on the property: a deep red clay subsoil or a shallower red clay subsoil. The provisionally suitable soil borings had the following characteristics. No restrictive horizons were found in any provisionally soil borings within 36" of the soil surface. Soil texture was provisionally suitable and was estimated to be silt loam to sandy loam near the soil surface (A horizons) and clay in the subsoil (B horizons). Soil structure was provisionally suitable and was estimated to be granular near the soil surface (A horizons) and subangular blocky in the subsoil (B horizons). Clay mineralogy was provisionally suitable with very friable to firm moist soil consistence and non - sticky to sticky and non - plastic to plastic wet soil consistence. Indications of saprolite were detected in some soil borings, but were not dominant in profiles. The major soil types on this property are Appling sandy loam (map symbol APB), Cecil fine sandy loam (map symbols CfB and CfQ, Chewacla loam (map symbol Ch), Enon loam (map symbol EnB), Georgeville silt loam (map symbols GeB and GeQ, and Herndon silt loam (map symbols HrB and HrQ. The Orange County Soil Survey indicates that moderate ( Appling, Cecil, Georgeville, and Herndon) to severe (Chewacla and Enon) limitations exist for septic systems installed in these soils types (Attachment 5). The land area required for a conventional or shallow conventional septic system is calculated based on the size of the proposed home and the Long -Term Acceptance Rate (LTAR) of the soil. The LTAR range for the provisionally suitable soils on this property is 0.1 — 0.4 GPD /ft2 based on the most restrictive soil texture in the subsoil. Table 1 below presents estimated conventional or shallow conventional septic system land area requirements for several home sizes and LTAR's on this property. The LTAR suggested by AWT for a majority of the provisionally suitable soil is 0.25 GPD /ft2, but the final LTAR for specific septic system types and septic drainfield locations will be set by the Orange County Health Department. The detailed computations are in Attachment 6. 2 Table 1. Estimated Conventional Septic System Land Requirements (including repair area) for Several Home Sizes and Long -Term Acceptance Rates (LTAR) on this Pronertv. House Size Loner Acceptance Rate Area Required for Minimum Area Required for Conventional Septic Innovative Conventional LIAR System Septic System 3 bedrooms 3 bedrooms 4 bedrooms 4 bedrooms 5 bedrooms 5 bedrooms ----- GPD/ft`----- 0.1-0.4 0.25 0.1-0.4 0.25 0.1-0.4 0.25 ----- ft" ----- 6,750 — 32,400 10,800 9,000 — 43,200 14,400 11,250 — 54,000 18.000 100-24,300 —7,020 750-32,400 10,800 438-40,500 13.500 Conclusions Based on the results of this evaluation, the installation of conventional or shallow conventional septic systems seems very probable on this property in the areas designated on the maps in Attachment 3. We appreciate the opportunity to assist you in this matter. Please contact us with any questions, concerns, or comments. elms 3 IM 187 ATTACHMENT 1: Property Reference Maps 36' 6'0" 36' 5'29" Soil Map — Orange County, North Carolina (Ennis Property - Efland) 66U /00 66U800 66U9UU 661000 661100 6612UU 6613UU 6614UU 661 SUU 6616UU 661 /UU 661800 6619UU 662000 6621 UU a 7' Public Road Access � [ Hay r Redgate Rd Hay Culti ated Field �i X660 00 660 00 660 00 661b00 661100 661 00 661300 661400 66A00 661600 661 00 66160 661C0 662 00 662100 _ Map Scale: 1:6,890 if printed on A size (8.5 "x 11 ") sheet. N Meters 0 50 100 200 300 Feet 0 350 700 1,400 2,100 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey oilliIIIIIIIIIIIIN Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 188 36'5'59" 36'5'28" 1/28/2012 Page 1 of 3 189 Soil Map – Orange County, North Carolina (Ennis Property - Efland) MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Very Stony Spot Map Scale: 1:6,890 if printed on A size (8.5" • 11") sheet. 0 Area of Interest (AOI) Wet Spot The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000. Soils Other 0 Soil Map Units Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Special Point Features Special Line Features Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping g p y pp g can cause Blowout Gully misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line Short Steep Slope placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting ® Borrow Pit — soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. X Clay Spot Other Political Features Please rely on the bar scale on each ma sheet for accurate ma Y P P f Closed Depression 0 Cities measurements. x Gravel Pit Water Features Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil SurveyURL: http : / /websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov Gravelly Spot Streams and Canals Coordinate System: UTM Zone 17N NAD83 Landfill Transportation This product is generated from the USDA -NRCS certified data as of fi Lava Flow Rails the version date(s) listed below. Marsh or swamp Interstate Highways Soil Survey Area: Orange County, North Carolina rr US Routes Survey Area Data: Version 11, Feb 19, 2010 Mine or Quarry p Miscellaneous Water y Major Roads Date(s) aerial images were photographed: 6/16/2006 Perennial waters Local Roads The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background y Rock Outcrop imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. + Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole ;y Slide or Slip jif Sodic Spot 3 Spoil Area j) Stony Spot USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/28/2012 � Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Soil Map— Orange County, North Carolina Map Unit Legend 190 Ennis Property - Efland Orange County, North Carolina (NC135) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI ApB Appling sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 1.1 1.0% CfB Cecil fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 14.1 12.7% CfC Cecil fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes 0.8 0.7% Ch Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded 13.6 12.3% EnC Enon loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes 5.3 4.8% GeB Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 44.0 39.7% GeC Georgeville silt loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes 17.4 15.7% HrB Herndon silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 8.2 7.4% HrC Herndon silt loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes 5.7 5.1% HwB Lloyd clay loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 0.0 0.0% W Water 0.7 0.6% Totals for Area of Interest 110.7 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/28/2012 il� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 5CALE: Approx. 1 " = 400' lega1� 191 OVA t s/ Axe o , !(l(�Cn ].�iy.�iy( -�C. r� + r 1 ,\ •_•" f r'� -a 4 ! �� » „'�� 1 ••� _ � J �`r��j ( f fZ�i/ �' tT `E ` ;t i i y � ,' t t i' ..- )I •`r � +�, E : , .f l r ,. ,�°v... •fir 1 r � ,� -ti.,, f ` ,' yy __ Y � i. � E _ w y _ t } i h >r' v - - tip.\ _ _ ✓ J l �s+����. l i � I f 1 • rf I f 1.4 _ 1 , i e r, I Vincent Property ASS vyd 10, Orange County, NC GIS Existing 0.83 ac. lot & house (Vincent) , Vincent Property ,t Wo { Woods 1 inch = 200 feet Created on 12/8/2013. Orange County, North Carolina. 5 http: / /server2.co. orange .nc.us /OrangeNCGIS /default.aspx Access Easement Proposed future Hart's Mill road (approx. alignment) 0 Proposed replacement 1 ac. lot & house for Vincent (NT5) 111.5 ac tract under option by Hart's Mill, LLC (Ennis) 192 1 of 1 12/8/2013 7:12 PM 193 ATTACHMENT 2: Review of Rules Pertaining to Domestic Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems 194 Five categories of soil and landscape characteristics are evaluated to determine soil suitability for domestic sewage treatment and disposal systems and include: topography and landscape position, soil morphological characteristics, soil wetness conditions, soil depth, and restrictive horizons. The soil and landscape characteristics found in a particular location dictate the type(s) of domestic sewage treatment and disposal system that can be used on a parcel of land. The detailed rules can be found in Section .1900 — Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems as Amended by the Orange County Board of Health, but a general review of the five categories and other relevant rules can be found in the sections below. .1940 TOPOGRAPHY AND LANDSCAPE POSITION Uniform slopes less than 15 percent are considered suitable, uniform slopes between 15 and 30 percent are considered provisionally suitable, and slopes greater than 30 percent are considered unsuitable for domestic sewage treatment and disposal systems. Complex slope patterns and slopes dissected by gullies and ravines are considered unsuitable for domestic sewage treatment and disposal systems. Depressions and wetlands are also considered unsuitable for domestic sewage treatment and disposal systems. .1941 SOIL MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS Sandy and coarse loamy textured soils (sand, loamy sand, sandy loam, and loam) are considered suitable for domestic sewage treatment and disposal systems. Fine loamy and clayey textured soils (silt, silt loam, sandy clay loam, clay loam, silty clay loam, sandy clay, silty clay, and clay) are considered provisionally suitable for domestic sewage treatment and disposal systems. Crumb, granular, and single - grained soil structures are considered suitable for domestic sewage treatment and disposal systems. Blocky soil structures are considered provisionally suitable for domestic sewage treatment and disposal systems. Platy, prismatic, and massive soil structures are considered unsuitable for domestic sewage treatment and disposal systems. Slightly expansive clay mineralogy is considered suitable for domestic sewage treatment and disposal systems. Slightly expansive clay minerals exhibit loose, very friable, friable, or firm moist soil consistence. Expansive clay mineralogy is considered unsuitable for domestic sewage treatment and disposal systems. Expansive clay minerals exhibit very firm or extremely firm moist soil consistence. Organic soils are considered unsuitable for domestic sewage treatment and disposal systems. .1942 SOIL WETNESS CONDITIONS Soil wetness conditions are caused by seasonal high water table, perched water table, tidal water, seasonally saturated soils, or lateral water movement. Soil wetness conditions are indicated by soil colors, either in mottles or mass, with a chroma of 2 or less according to the Munsell color charts. Soil wetness conditions detected 48 inches in depth or deeper are considered suitable for domestic sewage treatment and disposal systems. Soil wetness conditions detected between 36 to 48 inches in depth are considered provisionally suitable for domestic sewage treatment and disposal systems. Soil wetness conditions detected 36 inches in depth or shallower are considered unsuitable for domestic sewage treatment and disposal systems. 195 .1943 SOIL DEPTH Soil depths to rock, parent material, or saprolite greater than 48 inches are considered suitable for domestic sewage treatment and disposal systems. Soil depths to rock, parent material, or saprolite between 36 and 48 inches are considered provisionally suitable for domestic sewage treatment and disposal systems. Soil depths to rock, parent material, or saprolite less than 36 inches are considered unsuitable for domestic sewage treatment and disposal systems. Saprolite has a massive, rock - controlled structure, and retains the mineral arrangement of its parent rock in at least 50 percent of its volume. Saprolite only forms from metamorphic and igneous rock parent materials and is typically referred to as "rotten rock ". .1944 RESTRICTIVE HORIZONS Restrictive horizons are capable of perching ground water or sewage effluent and are strongly compacted or cemented. Restrictive horizons resist soil excavation or augering. Soils with restrictive horizons three inches or more in thickness at depths greater than 48 inches are considered suitable for domestic sewage treatment and disposal systems. Soils with restrictive horizons three inches or more in thickness at depths between 36 and 48 inches are considered provisionally suitable for domestic sewage treatment and disposal systems. Soils with restrictive horizons three inches or more in thickness at depths less than 36 inches are considered unsuitable for domestic sewage treatment and disposal systems. 1950 LOCATION OF SANITARY SEWAGE SYSTEMS No area for domestic sewage treatment and disposal system installation (or repair in Wake County) may be disturbed by clearing, excavation, filling, vehicle or equipment traffic, or storage of building materials. 1947 DETERMINATION OF OVERALL SITE SUITABILITY .1948 SITE CLASSIFICATION All of the criteria for the five categories above are to be determined and classified as suitable, provisionally suitable, or suitable according to the respective rules described above. If all criteria are classified the same, that overall site classification will prevail. If there is a variation in the classification of several criteria, the most limiting classification will be used to determine the overall site classification. A suitable classification generally indicates soil and landscape conditions favorable for the operation of a domestic sewage treatment and disposal system or slight limitations that can be readily overcome by proper design and installation. A provisionally suitable classification indicates soil and /or landscape conditions have moderate limitations for the operation of a domestic sewage treatment and disposal system, but modifications and careful planning, design, and installation can result in satisfactory system function. An unsuitable classification indicates severe soil and /or landscape limitations for the operation of a domestic sewage treatment and disposal system. SUMMARY Suitable /provisionally suitable landscapes and soils to a depth of 36 inches can, in general, be used for conventional gravity driven septic systems. Suitable /provisionally suitable landscapes and soils to a depth of 24 —36 inches can, in general, be used for alternative septic systems such 196 as shallow conventional and low pressure pipe systems, among others. All alternative systems for provisionally suitable landscapes and soils must be proposed to and approved by the Orange County Health Department. Any landscapes or soils classified as unsuitable may be reclassified as provisionally suitable by the Orange County Health Department after a site investigation by department personnel. 197 ATTACHMENT 3: Property Maps Detailing Soil Suitability for Septic Systems and Soil Types Agn -Waste Technology, Inc I 501 N. Salem St. Suite 203 Apex NC 27502 P: 919.859.0669 www.n.aste.com Soil Evaluation Map Entire Lot Ennis -Hart's Mill PIN: 9835945500 Orange Co. NC N Suitable Area 30,525 sq.ft. (NW of Lot) 1,687,249 sq.ft. (East of Lot) Soil Types: C1B -Cecil fine sandy loam Gee 8 GeC- Georg -ille silt loam HrB- Hemdon silt loam Julie Drawn By: Davidson Reviewed 1 • ­This map was created for proposed planning purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a plat or survey map of any type.— AWr Engineers and Soil Scientists Agn -Waste Technology, Inc 501 N. Salem St. Suite 203 Apex NC 27502 P: 919.859.0669 _ago-.t.. com Soil Evaluation Map NW of Lot Ennis -Hart's Mill PIN: 9835945500 N Orange Co. INC Suitable Area 30,525 q.ft. (NW of Lot) Soil Types: CB -Cecil fine sandy loam Gee 8 GeC- Georgeville silt loam HrB- Hemdon silt loam Julie Drawn By: Davidson Reviewed By: Jeff Vaughan Date ­This map was created for proposed planning purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a plat or survey map of any type. * ** 200 ATTACHMENT 4: Typical Profile Descriptions of Provisionally Suitable Soil Applicant: Ms. Alana Ennis Address: 4209 Pin Oak Drive Durham, NC 27707 Property ID #: 9835945500 201 Property Recorded: County: Orange SOIL /SITE EVALUATION FOR ON -SITE WASTEWATER SYSTEM Owner: X Agent:_ Phone: (919)401 -5362 Dates Evaluated: 1/2/14, 1/3/14, & 1/6/14 Proposed Facility: Residential Property Size: Approximately 70 acres Location Site: Frazier Road, Mebane, NC Water Supply: On Site Well X Comm. Well_ Public_ Other_ Evaluation Method: Auger Boring X Pit Cut TYPICAL PROFILE Horizon/ Depth (IN) Matrix Mottles Mottle Abundance / Contrast (a)(1) Texture (a)(2) Structure (a)(3) Minerology Consistence Wet Consistence Moist A 0 -5" 10YR 4/4 None None SL -SiL GR SEXP NS, NP Vfr Btl 5 -36" 2.5YR 4/8 None None C SBK SEXP S, P Fr -Fi Bt2 32 -36" 2.5YR 4/8 10YR 6/8; 10YR 8/1 2, m, D C SBK SEXP S, P Fr - Fi .1940 Landscape Pos /Slope % - Suitable, <15% Profile LTAR - 0.4 — 0.1 GPD /ft2 .1942 Wetness Condition - Suitable System Type - Provisionally suitable for shallow conventional systems due to texture, structure, and depth. 1943/.1956 Saprolite - Suitable 10YR 4/4 .1944 Restrictive Horizon - Suitable SL -SiL .1948 Profile Classification - Provisionally suitable NS, NP Comments: Some indications of saprolite beginning around 30 ", but not dominant. TYPICAL PROFILE Horizon/ Depth (IN) Matrix Mottles Mottle Abundance /Contrast (a)(1) Tex- ture (a)(2) Structure (a)(3) Minerology Consistence Wet Consistence Moist A 0 -5" 10YR 4/4 None None SL -SiL GR SEXP NS, NP Vfr Btl 5 -32" 2.5YR 4/8 None None C SBK SEXP S, P Fr - Fi Bt2 32 -36" 2.5YR 4/8 10YR 6/8; 10YR 8/1 2, m, D C SBK SEXP S, P Fr - Fi .1940 Landscape Pos /Slope % - Suitable, <15% Profile LTAR - 0.4 — 0.1 GPD /ft2 - Suitable .1942 Wetness Condition CC - Concave Slope System Type - Provisionally suitable for shallow conventional systems due S - Sand - Suitable CV - Convex Slope 1943/.1956 Saprolite LS - Loamy Sand to texture, structure, and depth. DS - Debris Slump - Suitable .1944 Restrictive Horizon D - Depression 11 - Provisionally suitable 0.8-0.6 .1948 Profile Classification L - Loam Comments: Some indications of saprolite beginning around 28 ", but not dominant. EVALUATED BY: Chris McGee, Jeff Vaughan, Trent Bostic, Jesse Vaughan COMMENTS: 10 OEM 11 01XIIWEI1131]O&TAET40111MV0111: N0aO&TIR R104 01110011MV1I LANDSCAPE POSITION TEXTURE GROUP TEXTURE CLASS .1955 LTAR (gal/day /sqft) CC - Concave Slope I S - Sand 1.2 - .08 CV - Convex Slope LS - Loamy Sand DS - Debris Slump D - Depression 11 SL - Sandy Loam 0.8-0.6 DW - Drainage Way L - Loam FP - Flood Plain FS - Foot Slope III SCL - Sandy Clay Loam 0.6-0.3 H - Head Slope CL - Clay Loam I - Interflueve SiL - Silt Loam L - Linear Slope Si - Silt N - Nose Slope SiCL - Silt Clay Loam P - Pocosin R - Ridge IV SC - Sandy Clay 0.4-0.1 S - Shoulder C - Clay T - Terrace SiC - Silty Clay O - Organic STRUCTURE MOIST CONSISTENCE MOTTLES WET CONSISTENCE G - Single Grain Vfr - Very Friable 1 -Few NS - Non Sticky M - Massive Fr - Friable 2 - Common SS - Slightly Sticky CR - Crumb Fi - Firm 3 - Many S - Sticky GR - Granular Vfi - Very Firm VS - Very Sticky SBK - Subgranular Blocky Ell - Extremely Firm F - Faint ABK - Angular Blocky D - Distinct NP - Non Plastic PL - Platy P - Prominent SP - Slightly Plastic PR - Prismatic P - Plastic f - Fine VP - Very Plastic in - Medium c - Coarse Applicant: Ms. Alana Ennis Address: 4209 Pin Oak Drive Durham, NC 27707 Property ID #: 9835945500 203 Property Recorded: County: Orange SOIL /SITE EVALUATION FOR ON -SITE WASTEWATER SYSTEM Owner: X Agent:_ Phone: (919)401 -5362 Dates Evaluated: 1/2/14, 1/3/14, & 1/6/14 Proposed Facility: Residential Property Size: Approximately 70 acres Location Site: Frazier Road, Mebane, NC Water Supply: On Site Well X Comm. Well_ Public_ Other_ Evaluation Method: Auger Boring X Pit Cut TYPICAL PROFILE Horizon/ Depth (IN) Matrix Mottles Mottle Abundance / Contrast (a)(1) Texture (a)(2) Structure (a)(3) Minerology Consistence Wet Consistence Moist A 0 -5" 10YR 4/4 None None SL -SiL GR SEXP NS, NP Vfr Btl 5 -22" 2.5YR 4/8 None None C SBK SEXP S, P Fr -Fi Bt2 22 -30" 2.5YR 4/8 10YR 6/8; 10YR 8/1 2, m, D C SBK SEXP S, P Fr - Fi BC2 30 -36" 2.5YR 4/8 10YR 6/8; 10YR 8/1 2, m, D C SBK SEXP S, P Fr - Fi .1940 Landscape Pos /Slope % - Suitable, <15% Profile LTAR - 0.4 — 0.1 GPD /ft2 .1942 Wetness Condition - Suitable System Type - Provisionally suitable for shallow conventional systems due to texture, structure, and depth. 1943/.1956 Saprolite - Suitable .1944 Restrictive Horizon - Suitable .1948 Profile Classification - Provisionally suitable Comments: Some indications of saprolite beginning around 30 ", but not dominant. TYPICAL PROFILE Horizon/ Depth (IN) Matrix Mottles Mottle Abundance /Contrast (a)(1) Tex- ture (a)(2) Structure (a)(3) Minerology Consistence Wet Consistence Moist .1940 Landscape Pos /Slope % TEXTURE GROUP Profile LTAR .1955 LTAR .1942 Wetness Condition System Type .1943/.1956 Saprolite CC - Concave Slope I .1944 Restrictive Horizon S - Sand 1.2 - .08 .1948 Profile Classification Comments: EVALUATED BY: Chris McGee, Jeff Vaughan, Trent Bostic, Jesse Vaughan COMMENTS: 10 OEM 1101XIIWEI 1131] O► T /%VY[11MV0111: N0aO► %1110401110011MV1I LANDSCAPE POSITION TEXTURE GROUP TEXTURE CLASS .1955 LTAR (gal/day /sqft) CC - Concave Slope I S - Sand 1.2 - .08 CV - Convex Slope LS - Loamy Sand DS - Debris Slump D - Depression 11 SL - Sandy Loam 0.8-0.6 DW - Drainage Way L - Loam FP - Flood Plain FS - Foot Slope III SCL - Sandy Clay Loam 0.6-0.3 H - Head Slope CL - Clay Loam I - Interflueve SiL - Silt Loam L - Linear Slope Si - Silt N - Nose Slope SiCL - Silt Clay Loam P - Pocosin R - Ridge IV SC - Sandy Clay 0.4-0.1 S - Shoulder C - Clay T - Terrace SiC - Silty Clay O - Organic STRUCTURE MOIST CONSISTENCE MOTTLES WET CONSISTENCE G - Single Grain Vfr - Very Friable 1 -Few NS - Non Sticky M - Massive Fr - Friable 2 - Common SS - Slightly Sticky CR - Crumb Fi - Firm 3 - Many S - Sticky GR - Granular Vfi - Very Firm VS - Very Sticky SBK - Subgranular Blocky Ell - Extremely Firm F - Faint ABK - Angular Blocky D - Distinct NP - Non Plastic PL - Platy P - Prominent SP - Slightly Plastic PR - Prismatic P - Plastic f - Fine VP - Very Plastic in - Medium c - Coarse 205 ATTACHMENT 5: Soil Survey Information ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA TABLE ?. -- SANITARY FACILITIES [ "Peres slowly" and some of the other terms that describe restrictive soil features are defined in the Glossary. See text for definitions of "slight," "moderate," "severe" and other terms used to rate soils. Absence of an entry means soil was not rated] Septic tank Trench , Area Soil name and ! absorption ; Sewage lagoon ; sanitary ; sanitary ! Daily cover map symbol ; fields ; areas ; landfill ; landfill ; for landfill Altavista: I I ' I ' I ' I Aa ----------- - - - - -- ;Severe: !Severe: !Severe: ;Severe: !Good. wetness, ; wetness, ; wetness, ! wetness, floods. I ; floods. I ; floods. I ; floods. I 1 I Appling: 1 I I i ApB ---------------- ;Moderate: ;Moderate: ;Moderate: !Slight----- - - - - -- !Fair: peres slowly. ; slope, ! too clayey. ! ! too clayey. seepage. ! ApC ---------------- ;Moderate: ! !Severe: ! ;Moderate: ! !Moderate: ! !Fair: slope, ; slope, ; too clayey. ! slope. ; too clayey, peres slowly. I ; seepage. I ; I ; I ; slope. I I IAuC: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Appling part - - - -- ;Moderate: ;Moderate: ;Moderate: ;Slight----- - - - - -- !Fair: peres slowly. ; slope, ! too clayey. ; ; too clayey. ! seepage. ! Urban land part. ! ! ! ! Cecil: ! ! ! ! CfB ---------------- !Moderate: ;Moderate: ;Severe: ;Slight----- - - - - -- ;Fair: ! peres slowly. I ; seepage. I ; too clayey. I ! I ! too clayey. 1 I CfC ---------------- !Moderate: I !Severe: I ;Severe: I ;Moderate: 1 !Fair: peres slowly. I ! slope. I ! too clayey. I ! slope. I ! too clayey. 1 I Chewacla: I I I 1 I I I I I Ch ----------------- !Severe: !Severe: !Severe: !Severe: !Good. wetness, ! wetness, ! wetness, ! wetness, floods. ! floods. ! floods. ! floods. ! Congaree: ! ! ! ! Cp ----------------- !Severe: !Severe: !Severe: !Severe: (Good. ! floods. I ! floods. I ! floods. I ! floods. I I I Creedmoor: I I ' I I I I I I I CrB ---------------- !Severe: !Moderate: !Severe: !Moderate: !Poor: ! peres slowly. I ! slope. 1 ! too clayey. I ! wetness. I ! too clayey. I I Enon: I 1 1 I EnB ---------------- !Severe: !Moderate: !Severe: !Slight----- - - - - -- !Poor: peres slowly. I ! slope. I ! too clayey. I ! I ! too clayey. I I EnC ---------- - - - - -- !Severe: I !Severe: I !Severe: I !Moderate: I !Poor: peres slowly. I ! slope. I ! too clayey. I ! slope. I ! too clayey. 1 I Georgeville: I I I I GeB, lGhC ---------- !Moderate: !Moderate: !Moderate: !Slight----- - - - - -- !Poor: peres slowly. ! slope, ! too clayey. ! ! too clayey. I seepage. I I I 1 I GeC ---------------- !Moderate: I !Severe: I !Moderate: I jModerate: 1 !Poor: peres slowly, ! slope. ! too clayey. ! slope. ! too clayey. slope. ! Goldston: ! ! ! ! G1D, G1F ----------- !Severe: !Severe: !Severe: !Severe: !Poor: depth to rock. ! depth to rock. ! depth to rock. ! seepage. ! small stones, thin layer. ! Helena: 1 ! 1 ! 1 ! 1 ! 1 HeB ---------------- !Severe: !Moderate: !Severe: !Slight- - - - - -- — !Poor. peres slowly. I I ! slope. I I ! too clayey. I i ! I I ! too clayey. I 1 See footnote at end of table. N 69 70 207 SOIL SURVEY TABLE 7. -- SANITARY F'A.CILITIES -- Continued ! Septic tank ! ; Trench ; Area ! Soil name and ; absorption ; Sewage lagoon ; sanitary ; sanitary ; Daily cover map symbol ; fields ; areas ! landfill ; landfill ; for landfill Helena: �HhA: Helena part - - - - -- !Severe: Peres slowly. 1 I Sedgefield part -- ;Severe: Peres slowly, ' wetness. I 1 I Herndon: HrB ---------------- !Moderate: Peres slowly. I I HrC ---------------- !Moderate: Peres slowly, slope. Hiwassee: ! HwB ---------------- !Moderate: ! Peres slowly. HwC ---------------- !Moderate: Peres slowly, slope. Iredell: ! IrB---------------- !Severe: ! Peres slowly. �IuB: ! Iredell part - - - -- !Severe: Peres slowly. ! ! Urban land part. I i Lignum: Lg----------------- ,Severe: Peres slowly, wetness. 1 t Louisburg: LoC ---------------- !Moderate: depth to rock. 1 I LoF---------------- !Severe: slope. I I Orange: Or----------------- !Severe: Peres slowly, wetness. I I I I Pits: Pt. ! Tatum: ! TaD ---------------- !Severe: depth to rock. 1 I TaE ---------------- !Severe: slope. I I Urban land: Ur. 1 I Vance: VaB ---------------- !Severe: Peres slowly. 1 I See footnote at end of table. ! ! ! ! !Slight----- - - - - -- !Severe: too clayey. ! ! !Slight----- - - - - -- !Severe: too clayey. ! ! ! ! ;Moderate: ;Moderate: ! seepage. ! too clayey. !Severe: ! slope. I I I I I I !Moderate: slope. I I !Severe: ! slope. I I I ! I ;Moderate: ! slope. I I I 1 I ;Moderate: ! slope. ! i I I I I I !Severe: ! wetness. I I ;Severe: ! seepage. ;Severe: ! seepage. !Moderate: depth to rock. ! I I i I ! I ! !Severe: slope. I I !Severe: ! slope. I I I I 1 ! I !Moderate: ! slope. ! !Moderate: ! too clayey. I 1 I I I I !Severe: ! too clayey. I I !Severe: ! too clayey. 1 I I I I I !Severe: too clayey, depth to rock. I I I I ;Severe: ! too clayey, ! depth to rock. ! I I 1 I I !Severe: ! depth to rock, I wetness. Severe: seepage. ;Severe: ! seepage. I I 1 I !Severe: depth to rock, . wetness, too clayey. I 1 I ! I ! !Severe: depth to rock. I I !Severe: depth to rock. I I I I 1 ! I !Severe: too clayey. ! I I I ;Slight----- - - I - - -- !Poor: too clayey. !Moderate: !Poor: wetness. ! ; too clayey. ! ;Slight----- - - - - -- !Poor: too clayey. ! !Moderate: ! !Poor: ! slope. I I ; too clayey. I i ! ! ! ;Slight----- - - ! - - -- !Fair: too clayey. ! ;Moderate: ! ;Fair: ! slope. I I ! too clayey. � I ! ! ! ;Slight----- - - ! - - -- !Poor: I I too clayey. I I ! ! !Slight----- - - ! ! - - -- !Poor: I I ! too clayey. 1 I ! ! ! ! ;Severe: ! ! ! !Poor: ! wetness. I I ! too clayey. I 1 ! ! ;Severe: ! ! !Fair: ! seepage. ! slope. ! ! ;Severe: !Poor: ! seepage. ! ! slope. ! I I ;Severe: I I ;Poor: ! wetness. I I ! I I ! too clayey. I I ! I I ! I I I I ! !Coderate: ! I I I I ! !Poor: slope. ! too clayey. ! !Severe: !Poor: slope. I ! slope. I I I I 1 I i !Slight----- - - I ! I I - - -- !Poor: I I too clayey. I I MR ATTACHMENT 6: Septic System Area Computation Spreadsheets 209 Conventional Septic System Area Computation Client Name: Number Bedrooms: Design Flow (gal /day): LTAR (gal /day /ft) Trench Bottom Area (ft): Trench Width (ft): On- center distance between trenches (ft): Trench Bottom Length (ft): Minimum Field Area Required (ft): Minimum Field Area Required (Innovative) (ft) Total Field Area Required (ft)('): Total Field Area Required (Innovative) (ft)('): Total Field Area Required (ft)('): Total Field Area Required (Innovative) (ft)('): Ennis Created by: JV Created on: 6/20/2001 Updated on: 1/12/2014 3 360 (120 gal /day /bedroom, minimum 240 gal /day /dwelling) 0.1 3600 (Design flow /LTAR) 3 9 1200 10800 (Trench Bottom Length'Trench on- center distance) 8100 (25% reduction from above) 27000 (Minimum field area'2.5) 20250 (25% reduction from above) 32400 (Minimum field area'3) 24300 (25% reduction from above) (1) Provides for reserve area and soil irregularity, 2.5 to 3 is multiplier. Client Name: Ennis Number Bedrooms: Design Flow (gal /day): LTAR (gal /day /ft) Trench Bottom Area (ft): Trench Width (ft): On- center distance between trenches (ft): Trench Bottom Length (ft): Minimum Field Area Required (ft): Minimum Field Area Required (Innovative) (ft) Total Field Area Required (ft)('): Total Field Area Required (Innovative) (ft)('): Total Field Area Required (ft)('): Total Field Area Required (Innovative) (ft)('): 3 360 (120 gal /day /bedroom, minimum 240 gal /day /dwelling) 0.4 900 (Design flow /LTAR) 3 9 300 2700 (Trench Bottom Length'Trench on- center distance) 2025 (25% reduction from above) 6750 (Minimum field area'2.5) 5062.5 (25% reduction from above) 8100 (Minimum field area'3) 6075 (25% reduction from above) (1) Provides for reserve area and soil irregularity, 2.5 to 3 is multiplier. Client Name: Ennis Number Bedrooms: Design Flow (gal /day): LTAR (gal /day /ft) Trench Bottom Area (ft): Trench Width (ft): On- center distance between trenches (ft): Trench Bottom Length (ft): Minimum Field Area Required (ft): Minimum Field Area Required (Innovative) (ft) Total Field Area Required (ft)('): Total Field Area Required (Innovative) (ft)('): Total Field Area Required (ft)('): Total Field Area Required (Innovative) (ft)('): 3 360 (120 gal /day /bedroom, minimum 240 gal /day /dwelling) 0.25 1440 (Design flow /LTAR) 3 9 480 4320 (Trench Bottom Length'Trench on- center distance) 3240 (25% reduction from above) 10800 (Minimum field area'2.5) 8100 (25% reduction from above) 12960 (Minimum field area'3) 9720 (25% reduction from above) (1) Provides for reserve area and soil irregularity, 2.5 to 3 is multiplier. 210 Conventional Septic System Area Computation Client Name: Number Bedrooms: Design Flow (gal /day): LTAR (gal /day /ft) Trench Bottom Area (ft): Trench Width (ft): On- center distance between trenches (ft): Trench Bottom Length (ft): Minimum Field Area Required (ft): Minimum Field Area Required (Innovative) (ft) Total Field Area Required (ft)('): Total Field Area Required (Innovative) (ft)('): Total Field Area Required (ft)('): Total Field Area Required (Innovative) (ft)('): Ennis Created by: JV Created on: 6/20/2001 Updated on: 1/12/2014 4 480 (120 gal /day /bedroom, minimum 240 gal /day /dwelling) 0.1 4800 (Design flow /LTAR) 3 9 1600 14400 (Trench Bottom Length'Trench on- center distance) 10800 (25% reduction from above) 36000 (Minimum field area'2.5) 27000 (25% reduction from above) 43200 (Minimum field area'3) 32400 (25% reduction from above) (1) Provides for reserve area and soil irregularity, 2.5 to 3 is multiplier. Client Name: Ennis Number Bedrooms: Design Flow (gal /day): LTAR (gal /day /ft) Trench Bottom Area (ft): Trench Width (ft): On- center distance between trenches (ft): Trench Bottom Length (ft): Minimum Field Area Required (ft): Minimum Field Area Required (Innovative) (ft) Total Field Area Required (ft)('): Total Field Area Required (Innovative) (ft)('): Total Field Area Required (ft)('): Total Field Area Required (Innovative) (ft)('): 4 480 (120 gal /day /bedroom, minimum 240 gal /day /dwelling) 0.4 1200 (Design flow /LTAR) 3 9 400 3600 (Trench Bottom Length'Trench on- center distance) 2700 (25% reduction from above) 9000 (Minimum field area'2.5) 6750 (25% reduction from above) 10800 (Minimum field area'3) 8100 (25% reduction from above) (1) Provides for reserve area and soil irregularity, 2.5 to 3 is multiplier. Client Name: Ennis Number Bedrooms: Design Flow (gal /day): LTAR (gal /day /ft) Trench Bottom Area (ft): Trench Width (ft): On- center distance between trenches (ft): Trench Bottom Length (ft): Minimum Field Area Required (ft): Minimum Field Area Required (Innovative) (ft) Total Field Area Required (ft)('): Total Field Area Required (Innovative) (ft)('): Total Field Area Required (ft)('): Total Field Area Required (Innovative) (ft)('): 4 480 (120 gal /day /bedroom, minimum 240 gal /day /dwelling) 0.25 1920 (Design flow /LTAR) 3 9 640 5760 (Trench Bottom Length'Trench on- center distance) 4320 (25% reduction from above) 14400 (Minimum field area'2.5) 10800 (25% reduction from above) 17280 (Minimum field area'3) 12960 (25% reduction from above) (1) Provides for reserve area and soil irregularity, 2.5 to 3 is multiplier. 211 Conventional Septic System Area Computation Client Name: Number Bedrooms: Design Flow (gal /day): LTAR (gal /day /ft) Trench Bottom Area (ft): Trench Width (ft): On- center distance between trenches (ft): Trench Bottom Length (ft): Minimum Field Area Required (ft): Minimum Field Area Required (Innovative) (ft) Total Field Area Required (ft)('): Total Field Area Required (Innovative) (ft)('): Total Field Area Required (ft)('): Total Field Area Required (Innovative) (ft)('): Ennis Created by: JV Created on: 6/20/2001 Updated on: 1/12/2014 5 600 (120 gal /day /bedroom, minimum 240 gal /day /dwelling) 0.1 6000 (Design flow /LTAR) 3 9 2000 18000 (Trench Bottom Length'Trench on- center distance) 13500 (25% reduction from above) 45000 (Minimum field area'2.5) 33750 (25% reduction from above) 54000 (Minimum field area'3) 40500 (25% reduction from above) (1) Provides for reserve area and soil irregularity, 2.5 to 3 is multiplier. Client Name: Ennis Number Bedrooms: Design Flow (gal /day): LTAR (gal /day /ft) Trench Bottom Area (ft): Trench Width (ft): On- center distance between trenches (ft): Trench Bottom Length (ft): Minimum Field Area Required (ft): Minimum Field Area Required (Innovative) (ft) Total Field Area Required (ft)('): Total Field Area Required (Innovative) (ft)('): Total Field Area Required (ft)('): Total Field Area Required (Innovative) (ft)('): 5 600 (120 gal /day /bedroom, minimum 240 gal /day /dwelling) 0.4 1500 (Design flow /LTAR) 3 9 500 4500 (Trench Bottom Length'Trench on- center distance) 3375 (25% reduction from above) 11250 (Minimum field area'2.5) 8437.5 (25% reduction from above) 13500 (Minimum field area'3) 10125 (25% reduction from above) (1) Provides for reserve area and soil irregularity, 2.5 to 3 is multiplier. Client Name: Number Bedrooms: Design Flow (gal /day): LTAR (gal /day /ft) Trench Bottom Area (ft): Trench Width (ft): On- center distance between trenches (ft): Trench Bottom Length (ft): Minimum Field Area Required (ft): Minimum Field Area Required (Innovative) (ft) Total Field Area Required (ft)('): Total Field Area Required (Innovative) (ft)('): Total Field Area Required (ft)('): Total Field Area Required (Innovative) (ft)('): Ennis 5 600 (120 gal /day /bedroom, minimum 240 gal /day /dwelling) 0.25 2400 (Design flow /LTAR) 3 9 800 7200 (Trench Bottom Length'Trench on- center distance) 5400 (25% reduction from above) 18000 (Minimum field area'2.5) 13500 (25% reduction from above) 21600 (Minimum field area'3) 16200 (25% reduction from above) (1) Provides for reserve area and soil irregularity, 2.5 to 3 is multiplier. Traffic Impact Analysis for the Proposed Hart's Mill Village and Farm Prepared By Michael M. Hughes, PE 8112 Orange Grove Road Chapel Hill, NC 27516 (919) 270 -6462 212 Zvi r l f � r � � 4rr•. � � f 4 May 14, 2015 213 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of a Traffic Impact Analysis for the proposed Hart's Mill farm - based development in Orange County, North Carolina. The proposed development is to be located on the east side of Frazier Road, SR 1310, approximately one -mile north of the intersection of Frazier and US 70. The developers of Hart's Mill seek to create a compact village -style neighborhood with a high quality of life while minimizing resource use and preserving the majority of the land in agriculture, woodlands, and open space. The initiative is being led by a group of local residents who intend to live at Hart's Mill. They propose to develop 32 homes clustered on approximately 20 acres on an existing 112 acre farm. The ownership model will be similar to a condominium. The proposed site plan for the community is attached as Figure 1. The remainder of the parcel has been proposed to remain an active farm. The development application for proposed plan has been filed as a Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning Permit which, if approved, will forever stipulate that no further development of the parcel will be allowed. If the proposed plan is approved construction is be expected to start in 2016 or 2017 with gradual build -out to full occupancy over a five -year period. The proposed Hart's Mill development is envisioned to operate as a co- housing community similar to Arcadia and Pacifica in Carrboro in Orange County as well. The concept of the co- housing model is that the community is socially tight -knit and the individual homes are downsized in favor of a large community building with a central kitchen and recreational and social spaces, including guest rooms. Recent studies accessible through the internet document that because of the nature of the co- housing community, the residents tend to car -pool more frequently than do conventional single family, condominium and town home developments. The literature reports that a decrease by as much as 30% in automobile based trip generation due to car - pooling in not uncommon in co- housing communities. EXISTING TRAFFIC LEVELS The proposed project site is located on Frazier Road, which runs north- south, midway between US 70 to the south and Lebanon Road to the north. Both US 70 and Lebanon are east -west roads as shown in Figure 2. 214 Figure 2 is from the 2013 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) map generated by the Traffic Survey Group of the North Carolina Department of Transportation ( NCDOT). The existing traffic counts are shown in red at the locations where they were measured. US 70 has an average of 5,900 vehicles per day at the intersection with Frazier Road, and Lebanon has an average of 1,700 vehicles per day at its intersection with Frazier Road. Further to the west, just past the intersection with SR 1346, Saddle Club Road, Lebanon has an average of 3,200 vehicles per day. A review of the NCDOT AADT maps for the period 2008 -2013 shows similar traffic counts at these locations. The data indicates approximately a 1% increase in traffic count per year over the past five years. NCDOT has not published ADT data for Frazier Road. Lebanon Road dead -ends to the east of Frazier Road. As a result, it is likely that the majority of the 1,700 vehicles per day reported by NCDOT on Lebanon Road originate to /from Frazier Road and represent traffic to /from US 70 using Frazier as a connector to access points west on Lebanon and connecting to Mill Creek, SR 1345, and Saddle Club Road, SR 1346. Frazier is a well- maintained nominally 20' EP -EP asphalt surface road. The speed limit on the road varies from 35 -45 MPH and the ADT capacity is similar to Lebanon and Efland Road, SR 1004, and well in excess of 3,000 vehicles per day. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS The trip generation data for Hart's Mill development was prepared using the Institute of Traffic Engineers 8th Edition Trip Generation Model with OTISS software. The Hart's Mill development was modeled as a land use code 230 Residential Condominium /Townhouse project in keeping with the ownership plan A graph of the underlying average week day ITE TGM data for Residential Condominium Townhouse type is shown in Figure 3. As discussed previously, although recent traffic studies available through the internet show that the traffic generation from co- housing communities is much less than conventional residential development that land use code is not currently available through ITE. As a result, it is believed that the Residential Condominium /Townhouse land use trip generation model provides an upper limit on trip generation from Hart's Mill which, over time, will be proven to have over - estimated the actual traffic generated from the project. The weekday peak hourly AM, peak hourly PM and average trips predicted by the model for Hart's Mill are shown in Figures 4, 5 and 6 respectively. It is projected that most of the traffic out of Hart's Mill will be south bound with a left -hand turn onto Frazier, and most of the traffic into Hart's Mill will be north -bound on Frazier with a right - turn into Hart's Mill. 215 In a similar manner, it is estimated that once the Hart's Mill generated traffic reaches the intersection with US 70, most of the trips will right -hand turn onto US 70 with either I -85 as a destination via Buckhorn Road, SR 1114, as a destination or they proceed further south on Buckhorn with NC 54, Saxapahaw, Carboro, or Chapel Hill as destinations. The projected peak hourly AM trips generated by the model for Hart's Mill at build -out show 4 entering and 16 departing. The peak hourly PM trips show 30 entering and 17 departing. These hourly levels are not expected to degrade the level -of- service at the Frazier Road intersection with US 70 to the south or, if traffic from Hart's Mill exits or enters toward to /from the north, with Lebanon. The projected average weekday trips generated by the model for Hart's Mill at build -out show 120 entering and 119 exiting. It is fair to say that no positive gain in vehicles is expected at Hart's Mill and that the net traffic in and out will be the same because there will be no other outlet from the community. Based on the 2013 NCDOT AADT data, at build -out the projected level of 120 average weekday trips from Hart's Mill would be expected to increase the overall traffic on Frazier Road by about 7 %, using the reported AADT of 1,700 vehicles per day on Lebanon Road as a base line. Alternately stated, this would be a 1.4% increase per year over the projected five -year build out of Hart's Mill. In a like manner, the projected level of 120 average weekday trips at build -out from Hart's Mill would be expected to increase the overall traffic on US 70 by about 2 %, using the reported AADT of 5,900 vehicles per day on US 70 as a base line. Alternately stated, this would be a 0.4% increase per year over the projected five -year build out of Hart's Mill. 216 FIGURE 1 217 1.:75 46e 14x4 34p 1415 14.1@ 1444 1h]i 1343 1448 n 1445 :4 1384 3.3.42 143A 1435 1-4fr 1345 1417 - -- - 14}S 1343 1200 1306 yeyaaon Lobanm =1912 1427 1 __ -y 1458 1452 1425 –1432 �••, : 1 f'�' 141.1 Rand 1306 1426 14'11 I 193Q 4700 1341 1433 L451 Lebanon i .d 1851 MEBANE ti rti , X1457 ••MATH -S 13.$5 13134 1310 'lir:; 7 1454 1323 o q 1312 MEBANE 4 V • z ; 1403 � -770 7ioo�: '+ ' 1308 1A04 HART'S MILL SITE 4900 1309 1393 1900--- l 1384 4800 14 2 70 1 1463' 1 1444 1146 1373 �..` 87001 5900 1378 s ILL4 1310 ].4U1) 1.314 -1� Ella n0�n0eks a� 4900 — 1312 �emenlay Miles —�� 0 scnnnl 1�' 1303 7D •, 11� 1399 I -a sro 131 2400 7 �4. 1311 r"� 3 rrrw� 137: 3� 2500 "." 1 1 •, 6 90000 - 40 r�R�v 1400 as 1143 1142 lzs zlar� 1200 844 480 1800 FIGURE 2 11- r4 Cross ads 2013 NCDOT AADT MAP 1192 1141 1600 ' Residential Condominium /Townhouse (230) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 56 Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 179 Directional Distribution: 50°0 entering. 50% exiting Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range or Rates Standard Deviation 581 1.53 -1179 311 Data Plot and Equation 8009 7000 6000 5000 v c M a m 4000 t a a rn A 3ooa a 2000 1000 04 0 030 1000 X = Number of Dwelling Units X Actual Data Points Omitted Data Points Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.87 Ln(X) + 2.46 Average Mate R2 = 0. so 2000 218 Trp Gemraaon. FrF- TGM8th Edtti0n Figure 3 219 Period Setting Analysis Name: Weekday Peak Hour AM Trip Generation Project Name: Hart's Mill No: Date: 5/1/2015 City: State /Province: ZiplPostal Code: Country: Client Name: Analysts Name: Edition: ITE -TGM 8th Edition Land Use Independent Variable Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total Hart&amp; #39;s Dwelling Units 32 Weekday, A.M. Peak Hour Best Fit (LOG) 4 16 20 Mill Village and of Generator Farm - Traffic Reductions T Land Use Entry Reduction Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit Hart &amp; #39;s Mill Village and Farm 0 % 4 0 % 16 External Trips Land Use External Trips Pass -by% Pass -by Trips Non - pass -by Trips Hart &amp; #39;s Mill Village and Farm 20 0 % 0 20 ITE Deviation Details Weekday, A.M. Peak Hour of Generator Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. External Trips Hart&amp; #39;s Mill Village and Farm ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by %n forthis case. I—Summary Total Entering 4 Total Exiting 16 Total Entering Reduction 0 Total Exiting Reduction 0 Total Entering Internal Capture Reduction 0 Total Exiting Internal Capture Reduction 0 Total Entering Pass -by Reduction 0 Total Exiting Pass -by Reduction 0 Total Entering Hon - Pass -by Trips 4 Total Exiting Hon - Pass -by Trips 16 Figure 4 Period Setting Analysis Name: Weekday Peak Hour PM Trip Generation Project Name: Hart's Mill No: Date: 5/1/2015 City: State /Province: ZiplPostal Code: Country: Client Name: Analysts Name: Edition: Land Use Independent Variable Size Time Period Hart&amp; #39;s Dwelling Units 32 Weekday, P.M. Peak Hour Mill Village and of Generator Farm - Traffic Reductions 220 ITE -TGM 8th Edition Method Entry Exit Total Best Fit (LIN) 30 17 47 Land Use Entry Reduction Adjusted Entry Hart &amp; #39;s Mill Village and Farm 0 % 30 External Trips Land Use External Trips Hart &amp; #39;s Mill Village and Farm 47 ITE Deviation details Weekday, P.M. Peak Hour of Generator Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. External Trips Hart&amp; #39;s Mill Village and Farm ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by %n forthis case. —Summary Total Entering Total Exiting Total Entering Reduction Total Exiting Reduction Total Entering Internal Capture Reduction Total Exiting Internal Capture Reduction Total Entering Pass -by Reduction Total Exiting Pass -by Reduction Total Entering Hon - Pass -by Trips Total Exiting Hon - Pass -by Trips Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit 0 % 17 Pass -by% Pass -by Trips Non - pass -by Trips 0 % 0 47 30 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 17 Figure 5 221 Period Setting Analysis Name: Weekday Trip Generation Project Name: Hart's Mill No: Date: 5/1/2015 City: State /Province: ZiplPostal Code: Country: Client Name: Analysts Name: Edition: ITE -TGM 8th Edition Land Use Independent Variable Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total Hart&amp; #39;s Dwelling Units 32 Weekday Best Fit (LOG) 120 119 239 Mill Village and Farm Traffic Reductions T Land Use Entry Reduction Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit Hart &amp; #39;s Mill Village and Farm 0 % 120 0 % 119 External Trips Land Use External Trips Pass -by% Pass -by Trips Non - pass -by Trips Hart &amp; #39;s Mill Village and Farm 239 0 % 0 239 ITE Deviation Details Weekday Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. External Trips Hart&amp; #39;s Mill Village and Farm ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by %n forthis case. I—Summary Total Entering Total Exiting Total Entering Reduction Total Exiting Reduction Total Entering Internal Capture Reduction Total Exiting Internal Capture Reduction Total Entering Pass -by Reduction Total Exiting Pass -by Reduction Total Entering Hon - Pass -by Trips Total Exiting Hon - Pass -by Trips Figure 6 MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONAL ZONING PERMIT (MPD -CZ) PROPOSED SITE PLAN FOR THE HARTS MILL VILLAGE AND FARM ------------ 1 1 L 222 l8- noilloZ �k \ `se \ %4 \a= �o T BIQ24 4� I $ . SsR 8� aA ;Sa SS a vn� \ 1s¢ 5� v E c =• m$� §amN�me 5 $s \k: �Y Aga R �k \ `se \ %4 \a= �o T BIQ24 4� I $ . SsR 8� aA ;Sa SS a vn� \ 1s¢ 5� v 5 $s �Y Aga r gag '9. g a � = p U cn N cg cn cn as J� p � � Sg & a E s se 8$� Li -p p O QJ it it s 1 s li aN° \§ ° p p 9.R EWg Y�gn�§$ •••� E$s ��a g 9 as ;Ey °a % z° a P " x tY �Y Aga r gag '9. g = p U cn N cn cn CD p � � c � � Li -p p O QJ 8€ %j;ppE p <D CCT g 9 as ;Ey °a % z° iE� -0 � N fiF _aa °a$$e.M - ;, ----------- -- = _ — - -- - -. ; r - -------- ; -- 1 - _ _ , - - - - -- , 1 --------------- N W, I - �� Uw —fix -- ��� O i �I i wow ! �% ter- �'��� _ -_ _" 1 M —Y - •_,Lu J - -- - — I- 0, O 4 R 1. Al l ii i��, I , v - -_ , 1 T HS) OvoH H3lZVVHH - - ` a� o� s� �z g� ao o� �z Uj l- Z djLli 1803 ggiz =� ESE p� 0 Jcl:�W�� Eo rj) cc- ;, ----------- -- = _ — - -- - -. ; r - -------- ; -- 1 - _ _ , - - - - -- , 1 --------------- N W, I - �� Uw —fix -- ��� O i �I i wow ! �% ter- �'��� _ -_ _" 1 M —Y - •_,Lu J - -- - — I- 0, O 4 R 1. Al l ii i��, I , v - -_ , 1 T HS) OvoH H3lZVVHH - - ` a� o� s� �z g� ao o� �z vav Qwzj C JW 1 Eo rj) 1 1 I I I I 1 �I }% --- � - -�� I I I I I/ V' ass I I - - - -- I - zce W) adoy 6f3zv6,=f N g�Q Jcn� 1 i — I I I -i o� �o gv ao o� �z 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 i i i i i i i_ -- ass I I - - - -- I - zce W) adoy 6f3zv6,=f N g�Q Jcn� 1 i — I I I -i o� �o gv ao o� �z E vav z~ ~= QwZ�J I- di LLI� i L C cc 0- ) JZ ESE 6o JLl rj) � J� I— -J-w �i- rj) 63 cc I \` O---------- - -- O O O 0 1 o i OHO ol 0 z� Y z� ,o Y� 7O Y Y O� `Z a�� LU J LL, m o co (3 (3 J-z -Jo� `l - --- - - - - -- - - - - -' - � 1 I -------------------- '. 1 - - - - L Y' C P, + g98F6� f l 9 `l - --- - - - - -- - - - - -' - � 1 �3 dg ,o Mpg J5W 4UVM bWyh& - + L C P, + g98F6� f l 9 •i R s. a.. iaa� g 11pi it lL �o...,o,. y p �.a�• �3 dg ,o Mpg J5W 4UVM bWyh& - I I I� O w N ON ON N v O 0 C 0 A C s a A w J� � I � O 1 A �-o z� o� s go ao �o 2 z~J�2 Z Edo �LLJ� (J) wpr-�0� J�i cc w i = cc x I I I� O w N ON ON N v O 0 C 0 A C s a A w J� � I � O 1 A �-o z� o� s go ao �o 2 (% \ %z \j Uj \e e w \� §�� \\ \) !\ \ udo® Rm�mm /g � �Q U §w }� :k�o2\ ) �0 ©N2 (° \ \ \ | i | ;;;!! !$! ,!•§ :; r |, , §! ; ;■ ) | ! !!!!!! ! ,.! / \ k !! 4 \ !] i!1 K \\ /\ 2\ .> I vav Uj QZQ�I— J w a� ESE WO��O Lg 3cL I ❑❑ � I � I � I I II I. J I I I \ I f _..__J - -- --- — z� o� �o wU ao 2 1 I la �F Ia, Iz, I=, I, I, , I II I. J I I I \ I f _..__J - -- --- — z� o� �o wU ao 2 1 vaE z~z ~j QZQ�I— J J 3N i L � ESE cc Q a� fo LL n �J� Lg I I I I I - o EoE - w IJ I ' O b I ❑I I A \\ I I , I � O � ❑ � � =EWER❑ I � ❑ O g _ - 0 I ❑ I O I O O n II N ❑� I I ❑ O O ' N I N i �I s ' O N i >z z2 o� �o ao z Q-� ❑ a ac z ` � I l I� i 1 I T � I I 0 al I I - - , �1 I + +r + + + ++ ++ r i _ r .l r r+ + r + r 1 - � I I I' I `II ! t ,1 I I I u EUiI�Jaci snow, 5�3FF]]S30 _4 — b s pp�fiiff3ii3i� lg4ffaff s}qp[ s yypp ygg 233 v.dv ZZQ J~2 Q I— J J o cn ESE - i® WOE �Q� x a� fo �J�5Z1 cc °z_Z l I� o I' I: O I OI I I O I I I O I O _ I o I O� N 1a _ i — N O - O1 N rY ��V// 0 m� a Z U� W= IL i i i i z� o� �o ao .aaon�a :�.n e3dn sa�arsr.ar •irio.�n ww ..wr �.-n�'n -auwn MA w � a 11, y ag iuh�h zl Ca11 y� � lillikil �a �g r J. u -- - -- - -- -- _ - r u` w� r w ` �ws�� ::EaQ F a--Q L JICE a�YIIIkN ��L LLL •� yy 2 f �I �l I I � z� L Q � � � F o f Y m � { V m N i 4 JW ■ { V x m 'm 4 L U N O Z S J 0 0 r { U 4- �g M 1 inch = 582 feet 0 500 n � Orange County Planning and Inspections Department 03/27/2015 j ip lAttachmen� 240 %air, ,r /IN @1)rt,.vif" k?N /I r<aI�`/a. In s/ )I rhr q a.: h, b as a/ o-'^. May 8, 2015 To: Michael D. Harvey AICP, CFO, CZO Current Planning Supervisor - Planner III Orange County Planning Department From: Alan Clapp Environmental Health Director Orange County Health Department RE: Hart's Mill project - Frazier Road PIN: 9835945500 Michael, Environmental Health met with Katy Ansardi and Vic D' Amato on July 22, 2014 regarding the septic systems for the project. A variety of options for septic disposal were discussed including NC DENR DWQ systems, Orange County Health Department permitted individual systems, Orange County Health Department permitted cluster systems and Orange County Health Department and NC DHHS permitted large system. A specific system to serve the project was not submitted at that time. As you know the system options are quite dependent on the development type allowed by the Planning Department. Once it is decided if offsite options or systems in the open space are allowed then the developer can apply to Environmental Health for Improvement Permits. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Alan 919 245 2360 131 West Margaret Lane, Suite 100 ), Hillsborough, NC 27278 orangecountync,gov Michael Harvey From: Alan Clapp Sent: Wednesday, October 29,20I43/45PM To: D'Amato Victor; Michael Harvey Cc katy@osu|twodo.con[ Michael Hughes (mmhVDmmhpezon) Subject: RE: Hart's Mill wastewater system information to support site plan approval Attachments: LargeSubsurfaceProcedures-2013Update.pdf Environmental Health is fine with an application for a combined flow. Just apply for whatever flow you would like permitted. Just make sure Planning is on board with a large system versus individual lots and systems. Alan Clapp Environmental Health Director Phone: 919.245.236O/ Fax: 919.644.3OO6 VVebsite: Email: xomrxmcpxnr*sm yup Please tell us how we are doing by taking this very quick SLArvey. We appreciate YOUr comments. Fromm: Victor [n»oiUD:Victor .com] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 3:20 PM To: Michael Harvey; Alan Clapp Cc: katy@nesV|twmrks.0m; Michael Hughes/mmh@mmhpe.mm\ Subject: RE: Hart's Mill wastewater system information b} support site plan approval Importance: High Hi Michael and Alan — Hart's Mill is preparing to provide you with a draft application next week, so your thoughts on this e-mail (forwarded below) would be timely and greatly appreciated. The key question is: 242 "Based on our understanding of the application process, we were planning to prepare a schematic (line) diagram and a preliminary site plan /layout (showing tanks and preliminary drip zone locations) for the system, as well as providing a written narrative description of the system, including design flow and basic system component sizing calculations and general description of the technology. We can submit the soils report as an appendix if needed. Please let us know if this sounds okay or if there are other steps or additional information that Planning and Environmental Health might need in support of the application." Thanks for any input you can provide, Vic From: D'Amato, Victor Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 3:41 PM To: mharvey @orangecountync.gov Subject: FW: Hart's Mill wastewater system information to support site plan approval to From: D'Amato, Victor Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 3:37 PM To: Alan Clapp (aciaCap @orangecountync.gov); Harvey, Michael Cc: k cOresultworks.com; Michael Hughes (mmh rxcmh g com); Tucker, Bobby Subject: Hart's Mill wastewater system information to support site plan approval Dear Alan and Michael - Following -up on our meeting with Michael last week and our meeting with Alan and his colleagues in Environmental Health in July, we wanted to provide some additional information on the proposed wastewater system for Hart's Mill and get input from you on additional requirements for the master plan /site plan application. I am attaching AWT's original soil /site evaluation report for the site. This appears to have been generated assuming that each building would use its own individual onsite system (which is not currently planned). However, the soil morphology data should help inform the feasibility of using the site for a cluster /small community system, as currently planned. The current conceptual plan is to collect wastewater from the buildings and convey it by gravity to a cluster treatment area, where it would be primary treated in a septic tank and then applied to the soil using the state - approved anaerobic drip irrigation system (American Manufacturing /Perc Rite). We prefer to use drip irrigation to deliver septic tank effluent as shallow as possible to maximize soil treatment as well as uptake from adjacent /downgradient vegetation. Based on the soil depths AWT reported, we don't think aerobic (pretreated) drip will be required, but we can certainly pursue that if needed based on the results of the additional soil work that will be required and the County's findings in support of the Improvement Permit (IP) application. Likewise, it appears that ample area of provisionally suitable soils should be available to accommodate the design flow, which at this point is estimated at 7,000 -8,000 gpd. We understand, however, that additional soil characterization and hydrualic analyses will be required prior to issuance of an IP. Based on our understanding of the application process, we were planning to prepare a schematic (line) diagram and a preliminary site plan /layout (showing tank and preliminary drip zone locations) for the system, as well as providing a written narrative description of the system, including design flow and basic system component sizing calculations and general description of the technology. We can submit the soils report as an appendix if needed. Please let usknow if this sounds okay orif there are other steps mr additional information that Planning and Environmental Health might need in support nf the application. Thanks and have a great weekend, Vic Victor A. DAmato, PE| Vice President Direct: 919.48n.o07U| Main: p1n,480.8n78| Fax: 819.4ou.e2oo victor. damato@jgtrqLech, corn Licensed Professional Engineer in North Carolina and West Virginia Tetra Tech Engineering, P�. P.O. Box 14409 | 1 Park Drive, Suite 200 | Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 | PLEASE NOTE: This message, including any attachments, may include privileged, confidential and/or inside information. Any distribution or use ofthis communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlaWfUl, |f you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete i\ from your system. �� �� �� �� ���� �== m�� ��� Please consider the environment before printing. jjea.0 M�jLel` 244 N W-A lk,41" *6111 M111J Oki VAN Effic E DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Division of Public Health On -Site Water Protection Branch 1642 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 (919) 707 -5874 Fax (919) 845 -3973 PREAPPLICATION, APPLICATION AND DESIGN FLOW CONFIRMATION 1. Preapplication: Applicant and local health department (LHD) hold pre - application conference to review and transmit application forms, checklists +, guidance documents' and rules +, and to discuss project, information needs, field and review requirements and projected time frames. Applicant's consultant(s) should attend and On -Site Water Protection Branch (OSWP) Regional Staff may attend upon request by either party. 2. Application for Improvement Permit (Site Approval): a. Applicant Submits completed application to LHD, including • Project title, • property location shown on plat or boundary survey, PIN number and locator map ® name /address /phone /fax /E -Mail numbers for owner, agent, engineer and soils consultant ® whether the proposed system is new, a repair, an expansion, a replacement, or modification to an existing system ® description and location of water supplies (existing and proposed) and surface waters ® description and location of facilities (existing and proposed) to be served by system, occupancy and projected use patterns • list of wastewater sources, water use fixtures (points of wastewater entry into system), and projected wastewater characteristics (e.g. provide wastewater quality data for any non - domestic sources), and description of projected flow patterns • description and location of wastewater system components (existing and proposed) ® proposed phasing schedule for facilities and system components ® projected wastewater design flow rate(s) for each system component and phase of development, and basis for determining (by applicant's engineer) +- checklists, guidance documents and rules can be accessed on -line from the OSWP HomePage, at htt a: ilclrs. r�c.aub9ichealth,cE_�mfs�sw �s/ 245 documentation showing that both the wastewater system and the facility are under the ownership or control of the person owning the facility, or an owner =s association and tri -patty agreement shall be provided b. LHD reviews application for completeness and requests in writing additional information as needed from Applicant. Incomplete applications shall be returned. 3. System Wastewater Design Flow Confirmation: a. The LHD shall review and confirm prescribed system design flow rates when established in accordance with Rule .1949(a) or Table No I of Rule .1949(b). Otherwise, the applications shall be forwarded by the LHD to OSWP Central office for review and design flow confirmation. b. The OSWP - Central office shall review and confirm system design flow rates prescribed by the Applicant's engineer when established based on flow and wastewater characteristic data, use of water conserving fixtures in accordance with Rule .1949(c), or flow equalization, and for facilities not identified in Rule .1949(a) or Table No. I of Rule .1949(b). [Completeness of application for design flow determination by OSWP shall be evaluated and response given within 10 working days of receipt. If application is incomplete, response shall include request for additional information, and review and response to revised submittal shall be done within 10 working days of its receipt.] * SYSTEM, SOIL AND SITE EVALUATIONS Existing System Component Evaluation: a. Applicant's consultants, with LHD =s assistance and surveillance, shall inspect existing system components initially proposed to remain in use. b. Existing component dimensions, capacities, adequacy /suitability for proposed continued use (with justification), and needed repairs or modifications to be incorporated into the system engineering design shall be identified by applicant's consultants and concurred with by the LHD. OSWP Regional or Central office staff may assist with the necessary field review upon request by either party. 5. Soil /Site Evaluations: Applicant's consultants prepare proposed site plan based on a boundary survey prepared by a registered land surveyor, to include: all corners of property and property line boundaries relevant to system design wells /water supply sources (existing and proposed) within property or within 500 feet of any proposed drainfield(s) and repair area(s) and within 100 feet of all other system 2 246 components ® existing water lines within property and within 20 feet of any projected system component ® surface waters with their water quality classifications, designated wetlands, and existing storm drainage features ® existing roads and structures ® locations of any existing wastewater system components, drainfields /repair areas ® areas being proposed for facilities and system components ® preliminary topographic map (with at least five foot contour intervals) for areas to be evaluated for drainfields and repair areas. As soon as available and prior to field evaluation by the LHD, two copies of the proposed site plan shall be provided to the LHD b. Applicant's soil scientist field evaluates soil /site conditions within proposed drainfield and repair area and prepares report which shall include the following (see note and item Ac= below pertaining to need to inform LHD and OSWP Regional Soil Specialist when field work is scheduled and to request for them to concurrently do any necessary verification of field work): Soil profile descriptions which are legible (including information on slope, landscape position, texture, structure, clay mineralogy, depth, wetness conditions, and restrictive horizons) for pits or a combination of pits and soil borings made at each site for the initial drainfield(s) and repair area(s). Site(s) shall be gridded and field staked at 50 foot intervals to enable profile description locations to be identified in the field and on the site plan. Intervals between profile descriptions and the relative use of borings versus pits proposed to be made by the soil scientist shall be pre - approved by the LHD with concurrence by the OSWP Regional Soil Specialist on a site specific basis. Locations of pits and borings shall be shown on the site plan. Delineation of sites which are suitable, provisionally suitable, or unsuitable for different types of wastewater systems (e.g.: conventional, shallow conventional, LPP, etc.) Delineate in sufficient detail on the site plan to enable location in the field. Recommended LIAR for conventional, LPP, or other proposed system with justifying references. Soil /site -based recommendations for drainfield design and site modifications (e.g.: maximum trench depth, fill depth, surface /subsurface drainage needs, etc.). 5. Soil /Site Evaluations continued: Soil chemical data for sites proposed to receive wastewater from non - domestic sources, ncluding pH, cation exchange capacity, percent base saturation and background metal and cation (sodium, potassium, calcium and magnesium) levels, if 3 247 the wastewater is expected to contain concentrations of these elements greater than domestic underwater. For sites originally classified unsuitable, written documentation indicating that the proposed system can reasonably be expected to function satisfactorily, in accordance with Rule .1948(d). The applicant's Soil Scientist shall inform the LHD and Regional Soil Specialist at least two weeks in advance when field work is being scheduled at least two weeks in advance. C. LHD field evaluates site, with assistance as needed from the OSWP Regional Soil Specialist (including field work concurrent with applicant's soil scientist's field work) to verify soil scientist's evaluation and compliance with applicable rules. LHD prepares evaluation report, including results from independent check borings /pits, using DEH form 2601 (form is available on -line; show locations of borings /pits on site plan). As soon as available, one copy of the LHD soil /site evaluation shall be provided to the Applicant, and one copy provided to the OSWP - Regional Soil Specialist. SITE LOADING CAPACITY ANALYSIS, LAYOUT AND IMPROVEMENT PERMIT ISSUANCE 6. Applicant's registered land surveyor prepares field topographic map: a. Shall include site or sites for all proposed drainfields and repair areas with at least two -foot contour intervals (for level sites, spot elevations at 50 foot grid intervals shall suffice). Alternately, proposed lateral lines for initial system and repair can be field- located, flagged, and surveyed in on the site plan. b. Relative elevations along property lines and as needed to evaluate hydraulic gradient between field sites and adjacent property lines shall be shown on the topo map or site plan. 7. Site - Specific Information on Site Loading Capacity and Assessment of Groundwater Impact: Applicant's soil scientist or hydrogeologist collects sufficient field information and r�epares report showing how performance requirements of Rule .1946(4) shall be met, provides substantiation for proposed LTAR and assessment of projected compliance with groundwater standards, including justification. The applicant's Soil Scientist or geologist shall inform the LHD and Regional Soil Specialist at least two weeks in advance when field work is being scheduled. The LHD should be on -site during the collection of field information. b. Site - specific information shall typically include: H KM ® In -situ hydraulic conductivity measurements in the most restrictive horizon within two feet of the trench bottom to support selected LTAR. ® Logs from deep borings (usually 10 -20 feet deep) identifying restrictive layers, relevant changes in texture and density, and aquifer boundaries i In -situ lateral hydraulic conductivity measurements of effective shallow aquifer 0 Groundwater mounding analysis (level sites) or wastewater conveyance capacity analysis (sloping sites) ® Contaminant transport assessment showing compliance with groundwater standards at property lines or at any water supply sources within or adjacent to property. 8. Revised Site Plan and System Layout: a. Applicant's engineer and land surveyor prepares revised site plan and system layout (at scale not to exceed one inch equals 50 feet), including: ® All relevant features required to be shown in the initially proposed site plan (refer to item No. 5a above), and any proposed revisions. ® Proposed structures, roads, drainage features, water supply wells, water lines, and any underground utilities or utility rights -of -way 0 Delineation of designated wetlands, and elevations of 10 -year and 100 -year flood plains in the vicinity of any system component, and source of data 9 Locations of any existing or proposed sediment control and storm water management system components. • Locations of any existing or proposed groundwater monitoring wells. • Proposed location and field- verified layout of new drainfield(s) and repair field(s) and proposed alterations to field topography. b LHD field reviews system location and layout with an engineer =s level or laser level and informs applicant in writing of any problems found. Assistance may be sought from the OSWP Regional Soil Specialist staff upon request. 9. OSWP Review and Approval: a. Applicant submits complete site information package to OSWP Central office through the LHD (two copies for LHD, or as locally requested, and four copies for OSWP—Central office), including: • Application for Improvement Permit (item 2a above) ® Soil /site evaluation reports by applicant's soil scientist and LHD (items 5b and 5c above) ® Topographic Map (item. 6, above) ® Site loading capacity and assessment of groundwater impacts (Item 7 above) ® Revised site plan and system layout (item 8, above) Applicant also submits to OSWP Central office through LHD (two copies for LHD, or as locally requested, and two copies for OSWP- Central office), the following: 249 Draft legal documents for systems to be under joint or multiple ownership or control, including easements, association documents, and draft tri -party agreement, as appropriate Existing component inspection /assessment reporting, if applicable, identifying any needed repairs /modifications (item 4, above) b. OSWP Central office forwards copies to Regional Staff and other agencies as necessary. ® OSWP Central office compiles review comments from other divisions /agencies and distributes as appropriate. ® OSWP Central office engineering staff reviews site loading capacity and assessment of groundwater impacts. ® OSWP Central office engineering staff forward to OSWP Regional Soil Specialist comments pertaining to proposed drainfield /repair field layout and on any other siting /location /monitoring issues related to existing and proposed system components. C. OSWP Regional Soil Specialist evaluates adequacy of all submittals required above. Site evaluation reports prepared by applicant's soil scientist and LHD (field work should be scheduled to be done concurrent with applicant's soil scientist =s and LHD =s field work whenever possible) shall be reviewed. Any further field work or analyses needed by the applicant's soil scientist or LHD shall be identified in writing. Acceptability of proposed drainfields and repair fields layout, proposed continued use, repair or modification of any existing system components, and prospective groundwater monitoring requirements shall be reviewed with LHD and OSWP Central Office staff input. OSWP Regional Soil Specialist recommends approval or denial, or identifies any modifications or additional information needed prior to approval of revised site plan and layout. Interim site /layout issues and revisions shall be directed by the Applicant's consultants to the OSWP Regional Soil Specialist. Three copies of the finally revised site plan and system layout shall be provided to the OSWP - Central office, which shall provide copies stamped "Approved by the OSWP" to the local health department and to the Applicant's engineer, and notify the Applicant of OSWP Approval. [OSWP- Central office shall acknowledge receipt of site information package and identify incomplete items found during a cursory review within 10 working days of receipt. Response shall be given by the OSWP Regional Soil Specialist within 35 working days of receipt of complete information after determined to be complete. Revisions, modifications, and additional information shall be responded to within 15 working days. Submittal packages shall be returned to the applicant after 60 days, if package remains incomplete or if comments have not yet been responded to.]* 0 250 10. Improvement Permit Issuance: LHD issues improvement permit, after confirming OSWP approval of revised site plan and layout, and legal documents have been properly drafted, and when necessary, executed and recorded. b. The Improvement Permit shall include as conditions: required modifications to be made to the site, and statement that the permit remains valid only if the proposed facility served and the site otherwise remain unchanged statement that the Authorization to Construct shall not be issued until required site modifications have been completed and engineering plans and specifications have been approved by OSWP other conditions determined to be necessary by the LHD SYSTEM ENGINEERING DESIGN APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF AUTHORIZATION TO CONSTRUCT 11. Applicant and /or Engineer is encouraged to request a pre- design conference with the OSWP Central office engineering staff to discuss design options, receive updated rules and guidance documents, review procedures and projected time frames. LHD and OSWP Regional Staff may attend upon request by any party. 12. Applicant's Engineer submits engineering design plans, specifications and supporting calculations (submit two copies to LHD, or as locally requested, and three copies to OSWP Central office) a. The North Carolina Registered Professional Engineer's seal shall appear on all plan sheets and the first page of specifications and calculations. b. The design must be in accordance with applicable rules, guidelines, and recognized principles and practices of engineering and public health. C. The design must incorporate and be consistent with the approved site plan, system layout and the improvement permit. Facility description and details (e.g.: floor plans) shall be submitted (one copy to LHD and one copy to OSWP) as needed to confirm compatibility with previously submitted information. 13. Specifications must include: ® Description of all materials and equipment to be used, manufacturer's cut sheets, pump curves, etc. ® Project- specific construction methods, installation, testing and start -up procedures o Means for assuring the quality and integrity of the finished product 0 Specific operations and maintenance procedures, including requirements for system 7 251 operator; inspection, process and performance monitoring schedules; provisions for maintaining mechanical components and drainfield vegetative cover; and reporting requirements ® Provisions for residuals management Abandonment procedures for existing system components that are no longer required. 14. Plans and specifications for specific system components shall include: a. Collection systems and force mains: ® Plan drawings, including locations of manholes and cleanouts ® Profile drawings shall be provided when the collection system is a 6 -inch or larger gravity sewer serving two or more buildings or contains two or more manholes, or when it is a pressure sewer system. Otherwise show pipe invert and ground surface elevations on plan drawings for all cleanouts /manholes 0 Force mains shall be shown in profile when their length exceeds 500 feet, or when their grade is not continuous. Otherwise, show inverts at beginning and end, and depth of cover 0 Indicate proximity to utilities and pertinent features such as wells, water lines, storm drains, surface waters, structures, roads, and other trafficked areas. ® Detail drawings of service connections, manholes, cleanouts, valves, other appurtenances, aerial crossings, and crossings of roads, water lines, storm drains, streams or ditches • Alignment, deflection and infiltration /exfiltration testing procedures and pass /fail criteria b. Tanks: ® Location of tanks accessible to pumpers and maintenance vehicles, showing setbacks ® Tank dimensions and relevant elevations (bottom, floor, inlet, and outlet inverts, top and ground) ® Other pertinent elevations in pump tanks (i.e., float activation levels) or siphon tanks (i.e., siphon -trip and alarm elevations) ® Access riser, manhole, chamber interconnection and sanitary tee details • Complete construction details for built -in -place tanks, including dimensions, reinforcement details and calculations, and construction methods ® State- approved precast tanks shall be specified as to manufacturer, nominal capacity, whether or not the tank is rated for traffic loading and State approval number (i.e., the PT- number for pump tanks, and the STB- number for septic tanks) ® For grease traps, design and construction specifications in accordance with Rule .1955(k) Installation (e.g.: bedding, method of sealing tank and riser, pipe connections, surface water diversion) and water tightness testing procedures with pass /fail criteria Y Anti- floatation (buoyancy) calculations and provisions, if necessary 8 C. Pump stations: 252 • Pumps, discharge piping, and all related appurtenances (on the plans) • System total dynamic head calculations, pump specifications, pump curves and expected operating conditions (in the specifications). • Accessible pump removal system (on the plans) • Accessible float support system, float switches and float settings (on the plans) • Control panel and high -water alarm location and electrical connection details (on the plans) • Control panel /high -water alarm components (on the plans or in the specifications) • Description of float sequencing, control panel functions under normal and abnormal conditions, and appropriate settings (on the plans or in the specifications). • See also applicable requirements in item 14b above • Emergency storage capacity calculations and provisions for stand -by power (when applicable) • Lighting, wash -down water supply with back siphonage protection, and protective fencing, as needed d. Ground absorption fields: • Final layout, existing and finished ground elevations (on the plans). All fields and lines should be re- staked in the field if necessary prior to plan approval. Staking shall be sufficient to confirm all lines can be installed along the natural ground contour, maintaining minimum required separations, and to verify relative line elevations. • Trench and lateral distribution system plan and cross sectional details and invert elevations for each lateral (on plans) • Manifolds, supply lines, cleanouts and interconnection details and invert elevations (on the plans) • Flow distribution device design, construction detail, location, and invert elevations (on the plans) • Drainage system locations, discharge points and design details (on the plans) • Site preparation procedures (in the specifications) • Construction phasing and phased system testing (in the specifications) • Groundwater monitoring well locations (on the plans) and construction specifications (on plans and /or specifications) • Final landscaping provisions including compliance with erosion control requirements (in the specifications) For advanced pretreatment systems (e.g.: sand filters, tertiary wastewater treatment plants), pressure sewer systems (e.g.: STEP or Grinder pump systems), and industrial process wastewater systems, contact OSWP Central office for supplemental lists of information to include with project plans and specifications Other requirements or guidelines not listed above shall be demonstrated to be followed, including: 0 253 The Commission for Health Services Wastewater Rules [e.g.: .1938(f),.1946(4), and .1950(d)] Document entitled APlanning and Permitting Procedures and Design Guidelines for Subsurface Sewage Systems Where the Design Flow Exceeds 3,000 Gallons Per Day_ Accepted principles and practices of soil science, geology, engineering and public health 15. Design Review and Approval: a. OSWP reviews design for completeness, compliance with applicable laws, rules, guidelines, and good engineering and public health practice. b. LHD reviews facility and wastewater system plans for compatibility with improvement permit, and field reconfirms field acceptability of re- staked drainfields and repair field layouts. OS WP approves plans and specifications when complete and all technical requirements have been adequately met. [OSWP- Central office shall acknowledge receipt of engineering plans and specifications, a review engineer shall be assigned, and the design engineer shall be notified of items found to be incomplete during a cursory review within 10 working days of receipt. Response shall be given within 25 working days of receipt of complete information after determined to be complete. Revisions and modifications shall be responded to within 10 working days. Incomplete projects shall be returned to the engineer after 60 days if plans and specifications remain incomplete or if comments have not yet been responded to.] * 16. LHD may issue Authorization to Construct after confirming: All site modifications required in the Improvement Permit have been completed OSWP has approved the engineering plans and specifications SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION PERMIT ISSUANCE 17. Applicant, Certifying Engineer, Installer, and LHD shall hold a preconstruction meeting on -site to review plan details, site preparation steps, installation methods, construction schedule, and inspection procedures. OSWP Staff may attend upon request by any party. Provisions must be established for there to be engineer supervision and LHD inspection of all aspects of the system installation prior to operating permit issuance. The Applicant's soil scientist may also be required to be on -site during site preparation, selection and incorporation of fill material when determined to be critical to the proper installation of the system. 18. Installation shall be completed in a professional, workman -like fashion in strict accordance with approved plans and specifications (or approved modifications), and all requirements of the Improvement Permit, Authorization to Construct and applicable Laws and Rules. The owner shall maintain a contract with a registered professional engineer at all times 10 254 during the construction of the system who shall be responsible for certifying compliance of the installation with approved plans and specifications. A contract with a soil scientist for installation supervision may also be required. The certifying engineer shall provide record plans and specifications (one copy to LHD and one copy to OSWP Central office) along with the certification which shall bear his /her professional engineer's seal. The engineer shall complete an operation and maintenance manual including O and M materials provided by the appropriate equipment suppliers and submit to the owner and proposed Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC). 19. The Operation Permit may be issued by the LHD when: The installation has been properly certified by the certifying professional engineer, and record plans and specifications have been furnished. The installation is determined to be complete by the LHD based upon field inspection, including final landscaping, seeding and mulching, provisions for proper system maintenance and monitoring (e.g. any groundwater monitoring wells) are in place, a system Astart-up- inspection has been completed and the system is found to be complete and operational, and the system operation and maintenance manual has been furnished. The OSWP will assist with the LHD's final inspection for all systems containing advanced pretreatment components (e.g. tertiary treatment plants) or complex distribution or control components and may assist with other systems upon request. All necessary legal documents have been properly executed and recorded, including the tri -party agreement (when applicable) and any required easements, and documentation is provided that the owner has executed a contract with an ORC who is duly certified by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission to operate and maintain this system. All other conditions of the improvement permit and Authorization to Construct it have been met. Time lines established for OSWP review activities are subject to variation depending on staff shortages and project - specific circumstances. 255 Department of Environment, Agriculture, Parks & Recreation To: Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor From: Rich Shaw, DEAPR Land Conservation Manager Peter Sandbeck, DEAPR Cultural Resources Coordinator Date: May 13, 2015 Re: Hart's Mill Development Thank you for the opportunity to review the master plan for the planned Hart's Mill development located east of Frazier Road in Cheeks Township. My comments are based on an examination of the preliminary master plan that you provided, along with the environmental assessment conducted by the applicant with information from the forest stewardship plan and a summary of environmental data from Tetra Tech. Hart's Mill is a proposed "village- style" development with approximately 30 dwelling units, while preserving approximately 67 acres of the property ( +/- 60 %) as protected open space or agricultural use (e.g., pasture and cropland). As proposed the residences will be clustered around a pedestrian trail in the middle of the property surrounded by open space /farm areas. The proposed plan appears consistent with the County's desire to minimize adverse environmental impacts with respect to the protection of floodplains, wetlands, natural areas and wildlife habitat. DEAPR's database showed there are no significant natural resource areas (e.g., natural heritage sites, proposed wildlife corridors, prime forest) located on the property. The Biological Inventory that you provided corroborated our earlier findings. Earlier DEAPR staff completed the following assessment of the natural and cultural resources known to exist on or adjacent to the planned Hart's Mill property (PIN 9835748573). Natural Resources There is no significant natural heritage area (SNHA) known to exist on or adjacent to the subject property, however the perennial stream that flows through the length of the tract and McGowan Creek (which forms the eastern boundary) are significant water resources and wildlife corridors that should be protected from any future development activities. Both the stream and McGowan Creek appear to have intact forested buffers that are important to maintain (and possibly enhance) to protect water quality and stream habitats. Both streams are sources of public drinking water for the Orange- Alamance Water System, which operates from Corporation Lake located downstream of the subject property. McGowan Creek is a significant wildlife corridor that links other protected open space properties. There appears to 256 be a healthy population of beaver that utilize the corridor and provide additional habitat due to the flooding conditions that they create. The intention to leave 60 -80% of the property will be left in agriculture, woodlands and protected streams will contribute to the current forested and open space character of the neighborhood east of Frazier Road, which also provides habitat to plants and wildlife that utilize the McGowan Creek corridor. Cultura /Resources There are no previously identified historic properties or resources located on the subject parcel or on adjacent parcels. Since the Forest Management Plan makes reference to an old home site on the high ground near the center of the parcel, DEAPR would like to know about any possible physical remains of that home site, and seek permission from the owners to document or photograph any remaining structures or objects. Also, care should be taken to locate, identify and protect any potential human burial sites or cemeteries. The current Cemetery Census does not show any identified burials on this parcel. If you have questions please contact Rich at 919 - 245 -2514 or Peter at 919 - 245 -2517. 257 STATE of NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAT McCRORY ANTHONY J.TATA GOvERNOR SECRETARY March 30, 2015 ORANGE COUNTY Ms. Katy Ansardi Hart's Mill, LLC P. O. Box 2844 Chapel Hill, NC 27515 Subject: Proposed Hart's Mill Village Subdivision (Private) Located on SR 1310, Frazier Road Ms. Ansardi, Per your request, this office has reviewed the preliminary plans and narrative forwarded in your e -mail correspondence of March 24, 2015. Consistent with our previous discussion I am writing to advise that the connection of the proposed subdivision road is allowable subject to the requirements of the NCDOT Policy on Street and Driveway Access to North Carolina Highways. Prior to performing work in the NCDOT right of way, it will be necessary for you to submit a driveway permit along with complete engineering plans per NCDOT requirements for approval. It is my understanding that you are preparing a traffic impact study as required by the Orange County Planning Department. Construction of any road improvements identified in the study as necessary to mitigate the site traffic impacts are Please note that private subdivision streets are not eligible for State maintenance. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. ' Sincerely, C. N. Edwards Jr., PE District Engineer Cc: Orange County Planning P.O. Box 766 Graham, N.C. 27253 Telephone (336)- 570 -6333 258 104 11104 to] pill 0 TO: MICHAEL HARVEY, PLANNER I1I, CURRENT PLANNING SUPERVISOR, ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING AND INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT FROM: JEFF SCOUTEN, ORANGE COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SUBJECT: HARTS MILL VILLAGE AND FARM PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS —PLANS DATED 4/2/15 DATE: MAY 5, 2015 I have completed my review of the subject plans and I offer the following comments that must be satisfactorily addressed before I can offer my recommendation for approval: 1. Solid Waste Management Plan — This document must be filled out and returned to me for review and approval. A copy of the blank document will accompany the e -mail that transmits these comments to you. 2. Standard Notes — The following standard notes shall be placed on the plan in a prominent location: Construction Waste: • All existing structures 500 Square Feet and larger in size shall be assessed prior to demolition to ensure compliance with the County's Regulated Recyclable Materials Ordinance (RRMO) and to assess the potential for de- construction and /or the re -use of salvageable materials. • By Orange County Ordinance, clean wood waste, scrap metal, and corrugated cardboard present in construction or demolition waste must be recycled. • By Orange County Ordinance, all haulers of mixed construction and demolition waste that includes any regulated recyclable materials shall be licensed by Orange County. • Prior to any demolition or construction activity on the site the Applicant shall hold a pre - demolition /pre - construction conference with the Solid Waste staff. This may be the same pre - construction meeting held with other development /enforcement officials. • The presence of any asbestos containing materials (`ACM') and /or other hazardous materials in construction and demolition waste shall be handled in accordance with any and all local, state, and federal regulations and guidelines. Site Plan (Plan Sheet SP -5) — The plan shows a designated "Recycling and Solid Waste" facility along the entrance road adjacent to the Solar Array and raises several questions that need to be answered. First, Orange County Recycling would normally collect curb -side mixed recyclables (paper, bottles, jars, cans, cardboard) from 95 gallon roll -carts located along the street in front of each residence and if the applicant wants that service, the roads and traffic circle must be sufficiently wide /large enough to accommodate the collection vehicle. This would need to be checked using turning radius templates placed on a full -size, to scale plan sheet (which I do not have). Secondly, because the project is located outside of an incorporated town/city, garbage collection service will not be provided. So the 3 options are to have each resident be responsible for taking their garbage to a County Solid Waste Convenience Center, contracting for the collection by a private contractor, or having the project's HOA contract for the collection. If the applicant chooses the option of having a centralized shared facility it likely makes sense to utilize a `bulk' (dumpster) garbage container instead of individual roll -carts, however, in order for the County to collect the mixed recyclables, individual roll -carts must be used. The attached detail shows a refuse enclosure that contains 2 bulk containers (I for garbage, I for corrugated cardboard, and up to 9 mixed- recyclable roll- carts). If the applicant chooses to have the same private waste collector pick up the mixed - recyclables (instead of the County) that will be allowed but the annual collection fees will not be waived. If the applicant choose this option then a scaled and dimensioned detail of the refuse /recycling enclosure will need to be placed on the plans. Also, there must be adequate tuning movements to get into and out of the enclosure without making too many 3 point turns. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this plan and please let me know if you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter further. 259 Election to forego public recycling: As a condition of approval of the development plan, the Applicant agrees to forgo public recycling collection and agrees to the following conditions which shall be made a stipulation of final approval: 1. The site will not receive public recycling collection now or in the future unless a satisfactory recycling storage & collection station is constructed to County standards or contingency for such a station is included and shown on the current development plans. 2. Applicant must require at least the same level of current and future recycling service to its clientele as that provided by Orange County Community Recycling. 3. County fees for recycling associated with this property will not be waived now or in the future. Orange County Solid Waste Management Plal All development applications must provide a detailed solid waste management plan, including a recycling plan and a plan for management of construction debris. The following form must be completed to fulfill this requirement. This form must be completed and approved to satisfy the requirement of a plan for management of construction debris. Please complete all information in its entirety. Assistance in completing this form is available from the Orange County Solid Waste Staff at (919) 968 -2788 x107 or x109. (Incomplete contact information will delay plan review and approval.) Project Name Property ID #: Permit: Project Location Project Owner Contact Person Address Telephone Fax /Mobile Design Firm Contact Person Address Telephone (_) Fax /Mobile - Date Provide a brief description of the work to be performed under this application: (For example: construct a new commercial building [include use /sq. ft.], apartment complex [# units], place of worship, horizontal improvements for subdivision, etc.) Page 2 of 7 261 1. Site Preparation Wastes (landclearing, demolition, deconstruction) During site preparation for a project the amount of waste destined for a construction waste landfill or an inert debris landfill should be minimized or diverted for reuse or recycling. Many materials can be reused, recycled, or salvaged, provided that materials are kept separate. This approach may also reduce overall project waste disposal costs. Regulated Recyclable Materials (clean wood waste, scrap metal and corrugated cardboard) generated in Orange County must be recycled. led. During demolition activities, metal and wood are often not "reasonably possible to separate" or doing so may present health and safety concerns (asbestos, lead paint, etc.). In these cases only, are regulated materials not required to be separated for recycling. Consider whether the following materials will be generated on this project, in any uanti , and indicate the management method(s). No asphalt wastes will be produced (proceed to # 4 No aaareaate materials will be removed from the site (proceed to # 5) 1 Recycled at asphalt-paving producer Used on or off site. Describe use: Disposed in an approved landfill (Orange County Landfill charges no tipfee if clean) Other (specify): No aaareaate materials will be removed from the site (proceed to # 5) 1 Recycled as scrap at an aggregate roducer Used on or off site: Describe use: Construction and demolition debris landfill C &D Landclearing and inert debris landfill LCID Page 3 of 7 Other (specify): No metal waste will be produced (proceed to # 6 Segregated for on -site recycling collection Recycle at Orange County Landfill no tip fee charged) Se re ated for hauling to scrap dealer by eneral contractor Segregated for hauling to scrap dealer by sub - contractor Certified Commingled Recycling Facility Other (specify): ® ®- . . . - . . . . No structure(s) will be removed (proceed to Construction Waste section) Structure(s) must be removed. Please describe (include square footage for each structure): If any structure described above is greater than 500 ft2, it must be assessed for deconstruction possibilities. Please call Solid Waste Staff at (919) 968 -2788 x107 or x109 to arrange an assessment. Could the structure(s) be moved from the site? YES NO Don't Know Has the sale or donation of the structures been considered? Please explain: YES NO How will the structure be removed otherwise? What is the timetable on removal of the structure(s)? Are there salvageable materials (hardwood floors, fixtures, molding, that can be removed for reuse prior to demolition? If Yes, Please list (use a separate sheet if necessary): YES NO Don't Know 262 Page 4 of 7 Have, or will, these materials been offered for sale or donation? YES NO 263 . Construction Wastes During the construction phase there are multiple options for recycling building materials. Regulated Recyclable Materials (clean wood waste, scrap metal and corrugated cardboard) generated in Orange County must be recycled. Although other materials are not required to be recycled, you are highly encouraged to do so. One of the best methods of recycling is to separate the materials on the jobsite. You may also combine materials for delivery to a certified recycling facility. Specifying waste reduction /recycling practices on a project will assure better performance. No aaareaate materials will be removed from the site (proceed to # 4) 1 Recycled as scrap at an aggregate roducer Used on or off site: Describe use: Construction and demolition debris landfill C &D Landclearing and inert debris landfill LCID Other (specify): Page 5 of 7 Other (specify): No drvwall waste will be produced (proceed to No other wastes will be produced (proceed to # 7 Pleasespecify other wastes that will be produced and how they will be managed: Plastics (including vinyl and shrink - wrap): Carpet and padding: Shingles: Fixtures (sinks, tubs, lighting, etc): Other (specify): Other (specify): Other (specify): 264 Se re ated for on -site recycling collection Used on site as agricultural supplement Disposed in an approved landfill Certified Commingled Recycling Facility Other (specify): No other wastes will be produced (proceed to # 7 Pleasespecify other wastes that will be produced and how they will be managed: Plastics (including vinyl and shrink - wrap): Carpet and padding: Shingles: Fixtures (sinks, tubs, lighting, etc): Other (specify): Other (specify): Other (specify): 264 Page 6 of 7 265 3. Recycling After Occupancy Depending on the eventual use of the structure, different waste materials will be produced and available for recycling. Recyclable materials must be separated into categories based on collection methods. PLANNING REQUIREMENTS: • Indicate location of all bulk waste containers for refuse and recycling. Plan must show location of all containers, even if using existing refuse /recycling enclosures. Standard details /notes for any of the following are available from Orange County Solid Waste Management (919- 968 -2788 x107 or x109). • All refuse /recycling containers are required to be on concrete pads. • Provide a detailed and scaled plan of all bulk waste containers areas that show: each container labeled, required screening, lighting, overhead clearances, bollards, and concrete pad. • Indicate whether refuse /recycling area will be gated. Any doors /gates will need retainers to be latched open for refuse /recycling collection. • Ensure adequate collection vehicle access to all containers for deposit and collection. Access templates are available from Orange County Solid Waste Management. • Sharing of exterior recycling locations is acceptable if a joint access/shared-use agreement is filed and the deeds of all properties amended. Site Plan includes space for cardboard recycling container on Sheet # Corrugated Cardboard will be handled in an alternate manner. Description Required: Collection Type: This project will be served by the following collection methods. Check all that apply. Check materials that will be generated once the structure is ready for occupancy: Standard: glass bottles, metal cans, newspaper, glossy magazines, #1 plastics, #2 plastics Exterior individual or cooperative -use bulk waste container site. May be suitable for apartment com lexes, restaurants, places of worship, educational facility, office building, retail /office /restaurant combinations Corrugated Cardboard (not including waxed or single layer cardboard) Garbage dumpster Mixed Paper: junk mail, cereal boxes Garbage compactor Office Paper: white or colored copy paper, confidential papers Cardboard dumpster Restaurant: food wastes, cooking oil, disposable dining ware Cardboard compactor Other Plastics: #5, #7 Recycling carts for glass, cans, plastic bottles, newspaper, magazines, office paper (co- mingled) Business specific wastes (please describe): Site Plan includes space for cardboard recycling container on Sheet # Corrugated Cardboard will be handled in an alternate manner. Description Required: Collection Type: This project will be served by the following collection methods. Check all that apply. Exterior individual or cooperative -use bulk waste container site. May be suitable for apartment com lexes, restaurants, places of worship, educational facility, office building, retail /office /restaurant combinations Garbage dumpster Garbage compactor Cardboard dumpster Cardboard compactor Recycling carts for glass, cans, plastic bottles, newspaper, magazines, office paper (co- mingled) Cooking grease rendering container (required for any commercial kitchen facility) Page 7 of 7 Food waste collection container (If qualify based on volume; contact OCSW staff for details of program) Standard "curbside" recycling collection. May be suitable for single - family developments and subdivisions, including some duplex, triples, and townhome developments. Orange County Solid - Management 4' — 6' 6' 0" -----� 6' + ing Dumpster Pad Design Requirements: standard 6or8 cubic yard dumpsters 24'0" min. `A A �6'0" 16' 6' R 267 C 0 in 0 N • Pads shall be constructed from concrete with a minimum compressive strength of 3,500 PSI. ® Pad and approach (measured 25' from back of pad) shall be a minimum of 8" thick. O 2 concrete - filled 6" I.D. steel pipe bollards shall be placed as shown on the detail above and shall be set in concrete footings to a minimum depth of 2'. All pads shall be screened /enclosed on 3 sides (sides, back) and shall meet the requirements designated by the jurisdiction (as to materials, height). O If gates are to be installed on the front, they shall be equipped with retainers to hold the gates in the open and closed position and shall be installed in such a manner as to provide a minimum clear opening width of 12' for each dumpster (exclusive of mounting hardware). ® Unless alternate arrangements have been made and approved for the recycling of corrugated cardboard, 1 dumpster shall be designated for corrugated cardboard and 1 for solid waste. ® The.number of mixed - recyclable carts to be used shall be determined by the proposed use and as agreed upon at the time the formal request for service is made to Orange County Community Recycling by the owner /Applicant. KM Michael Harvey From: Jason Shepherd Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 8:33 PM To: Michael Harvey; Sam M. Schultz; Patrick R. Mallett Subject: Harts Mill The Fire Marshal Division has the following comment for this project: During review of this proposal, we did not see if a pressurized water system provided by Alamance Orange Water System Inc. was going to be part of the infrastructure of the housing development. Clarification is needed to determine if alternative water is needed. Thanks, Jason Sent from my iPad 269 Craig N. Benedict, Engineering / Erosion 131 W. Margaret Lane Control / Stormwater Suite 201 ( 919) 245 -2575 O 3E L �1 n a P. O. Box 6161 (919) 644 -3002 (FAX) f1,4 0R'1 't t CAROLINA Hillsborough, NC 27276 www.orangecountync-gov TO: Michael Harvey COPY TO: Patrick Mallett FROM: Howard W. Fleming, Jr., PE, Engineering /Stormwater Supervisor DATE: 05/12/15 PROJECTS: Harts Mill: Major Subdivision SUBJECT: Rezoning to Major Planning Development (MPD -CZ) DAC Review, 05/07/15 EROSION & SEDIMENTATION / STORMWATER CONTROL COMMENTS: Having reviewed the subject project, Erosion & Sedimentation Control / Stormwater staff members understand this project must proceed through certain discretionary actions in order to determine functional and economic viability, prior to the developers investing in more detailed design and subsequent jurisdictional submittals for compliance reviews and permits. That being stated, we find no fundamental objections to this project moving forward through discretionary approvals, subject to future submittals addressing the requirements in the Unified Development Ordinance pertaining to Erosion & Sedimentation Control and Stormwater. S:\9—Current Planning and Zoning\Zoning Administration\Zoning Atlas Amendments\2015 \Hearts Mill MPD -CZ \staff comments\HWF-OC- E &SC_DAC- Memo(Harts Mill)050715.doc ATTACHMENT 4 PLANNING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT Craig N. Benedict, AICP, Director 270 Administration 131 W. Margaret Lane (919) 245- 2575w'w ." Suite 201 (919) 644 -3002 (FAX) O P. O. Box 8181 www.orangecountync.gov N01-0-1 I a R0 A Hillsborough, NC 27278 HART'S MILL RESIDENTIAL MASTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING HIGHLIGHTS WEDNESDAY APRIL 8, 2015 LOCATION: ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING CONFERENCE RM 4. TIME: 5:30- 7:30PM MEETING ORGANIZER: HART'S MILL LLC (APPLICANT) The applicants are seeking the rezoning of a 112 acre parcel of property to Master Planned Development Conditional Zoning (MPD -CZ) to allow for the development of a 34 unit residential development and farm operation on a parcel off of Frazier Road, further identified utilizing Orange County Parcel Identification Number (PIN) 9835 -74 -8573. Per Section 2.9.2 (D) of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), regarding Conditional Zoning requests, the required Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) was hosted by Orange County Planning staff and presented by the applicant's representative. Approximately 8 adjacent property owners and area residents attended the meeting. The request was presented by Ms. Katy Ansardi of Hart's Mill LLC (applicant). Hart's Mill Master Planned Development — Conditional Zoning District - Project Overview: Applicant: Hart's Mill LLC and property owner Alana Ennis. Location: Frazier Road. PIN: 9835 -74 -8573. Zoning: Rural Residential (R -1). Overlay Districts: Upper Eno Protected Watershed Overlay District, Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) Overlay District. School District: Orange County Schools. Utilities: Septic field on 5 acres of the 112 acre parcel with water being provided by a 6 inch waterline managed by Orange Alamance Water System. Total Acreage: 112 acres (Approximately 22 acres of residential, 5 acres septic, the remainder in farm and open space) Access: Vehicular access will be off of Frazier Road Proposal: The applicant is proposing to develop a village style development with approximately 34 dwelling units on approximately 22 acres, while preserving approximately 67 to 70 acres of the parcel (approximately 60 %) as vegetative open space and farm area (i.e. pasture and crop production). As proposed the residences 271 shall range from 1 to 4 bedroom homes clustered around a pedestrian trail in the middle of the property surrounded by identified open space /farm areas. A common house, a shared facility approximately 3,000 sq. ft. in area, shall be developed as a place where residents and their guests can meet for community meals, entertainment, and mail pick- up. Meeting Highlights: Staff reviewed the permitting process for the project and reminded all in attendance the applicant was not proposing a subdivision of property but rather a large planned community where individual property owners would own their homes outright but only have an ownership interest in the property as a whole. With 34 planned residences this would mean an individual owning a house would have a 1/34 interest in the property. As a result of the proposed ownership model the project was not required to be processed through the Class A Special Use Permit process for a major subdivision over 20 lots as would normally be required by County regulations. Staff indicated the applicant was still required to provide information consistent with this process, specifically by completing an environmental assessment of the project and a transportation impact analysis, but that review of the project was going to proceed as a rezoning request. An attendee questioned this point and did not understand why a subdivision was not being proposed /required. The applicant reviewed the development and ownership model again. At this point the site plan was reviewed again with the housing locations. Staff reiterated that individual residential lots were not being proposed and that the developer would ultimately retain ownership of the property. The question was asked if the units constructed on the property would be considered tiny houses. The applicant indicated the goal for the development was an affordable co- housing community where smaller houses sizes were encouraged but that it could not be said this was going to be a tiny house development. There was a question asked about the farm activities that would occur on the property. The applicant indicated there would be crops grown on the parcel but that a final determination had not been made as to what this would entail. Further, the applicant indicted there would be some livestock but that farming activities would be kept at least 100 feet from common property lines. There were general comments made over the potential smell emanating from the livestock on the property. Staff reminded all in attendance that farm operations were exempt from zoning regulation by State law. There was general discussion on the limits on the regulation of farming operations. A question was asked if the project would involve the clear cutting of the property and harvesting of timber. The applicant indicated while there may be some additional clearing of property for pasture /crop land the majority of existing wooded area along the eastern property line would be maintained. Staff identified the presence of streams and floodplain in this area and reviewed County stream buffer regulations with those in attendance. 272 A question was posed on the location of septic facilities for the project. The applicant identified the septic area for the project. A question was asked if the master plan was approved by the County could work be done to construct the solar array denoted on the site plan without the residential units being constructed at all. They were concerned this was just an attempt to skirt established review processes for solar facilities. Staff indicated the applicant could not construct the solar array unless required permits were issued by the County. In this case a Class B Special Use Permit would have to be applied for and obtained after a separate public hearing had been advertised and held. There was general discussion over the development regulations and review process for solar facilities in Orange County. A concern was posed by an adjacent property owner over traffic on Frazier Road being increased over the development of the parcel. The applicant indicated they had reviewed the project with NC Department of Transportation officials where it had been determined there was adequate capacity within the existing road network to accommodate the project and not have a major impact on existing traffic thresholds. A comment was made there was already enough residential development along Frazier Road and that more was not needed. This individual also indicated he was not sure why a new subdivision was required when he felt there was enough housing in the area already. An adjacent property owner indicated he was concerned the developer would get an approval for the project, build it out, and then leave the area. The concern being all of the `checks and balances' being discussed here would be for nothing and that residents of the project would not have to answer to anyone. Once the project was complete the property owners could do what they wanted and all the promises of buffer retention and housing limits would go away. The applicant reminded all in attendance that the `developer' was actually going to live on the property and that development/redevelopment of the parcel would have to be in accordance with the permit issued by the County. There was no way to add additional housing unless the applicant chose to go through the process again and seek approval by the County Board of Commissioners, which would require a new public hearing. A comment was made by an attendee he felt better hearing the applicant/developer would be living on the property as part of the community and that empty promises were not being made over how the project would be managed. There was general discussion over this fact and over the development model being proposed by the applicant. A question was asked about the required 100 foot buffer for the project. Staff reiterated this was not a buffer but a building setback and that the applicant was proposing a variable width buffer along the common property line of 20 feet. There was general discussion on the proposed landscaping along common property lines and the difference between a land use buffer and building setback line. 273 A question was asked why the developer was not being required to extend a roadway through the property to allow access to parcels towards the eastern property line. There was also a concern expressed by an attendee this project would be allowed to tie into existing residential neighborhoods to the north increasing traffic along these roadways. Staff indicated it was not practical to extend the proposed roadway to the east due to the presence of streams and floodplain and that all parcels to the east of the project already had roadway access. The applicant indicated they had no interest in connecting with adjoining subdivisions as they did not want to create traffic problems for their neighbors. The applicant reminded all in attendance vehicular access to the individual residences would not be permitted directly. Owners would park in designated spaces and that access to the residences would be through a foot path. This path would be accessible by emergency vehicles but it was not the plan to have cars driving in the area. The applicant did indicate some residents would be allowed to use golf carts to access this area but that vehicular traffic would be restricted in and around the proposed residences. There was general discussion on the pedestrian walkway around the houses and over the parking area for resident vehicles. Staff concluded the meeting with a summary of the next steps in the process. The meeting was adjourned at approximately 7:30pm. 274 Craig N. Benedict, - • Administration 131 W. Margaret Lane (919) 245 -2575 Suite 201 (919) 644 -3002 (FAX) �i�� '�� "k1, � ��°°J E ���.� w��,��� ��n. rs,11.��� w�,..,��, P. O. Box 8181 www.orangecountync.gov N!0K1 "t-f CAR011N Hillsborough, NC 27278 March 23, 2015 RE: REVIEW of a rezoning petition to change zoning of property from Rural Residential (R -1) to Master Planned Development Conditional Zone (MPD -CZ) to allow for the development of approximately 30 residential dwelling units on a 112 acre parcel of property (PIN 9835 -74 -8573) To Whom It May Concern: The Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) requires that Conditional Zoning application to hold a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM). This meeting is to allow for property owners within 500 feet of the subject property to review and discuss the proposal with the applicant and /or their agents, as well as obtain an understanding of the review and approval process. You are receiving this letter because you are listed as an owner of property within the aforementioned distance of the aforementioned parcel. Please refer to attached aerial photo and Master Plan denoting the subject property. The applicant is proposing to develop Hearts Mill, a village style development with approximately 30 dwelling units, while preserving approximately 67 acres of the parcel (approximately 60 %) as vegetative open space and farm area (i.e. pasture and crop production). As proposed the residences shall range from 1 to 3 bedroom homes clustered around a pedestrian trail in the middle of the property surrounded by identified open space /farm areas. A common house, a shared facility approximately 3,000 sq. ft. in area, shall be developed as a place where residents and their guests can meet for community meals, entertainment, and mail pick -up. Please note, the public hearing for this item is not scheduled to occur until Tuesday May 26, 2015. Additional notices shall be sent informing you of the date /location /time of this meeting. As previously indicated, the intent of this meeting is to afford you with an opportunity to learn the intricacies and elements associated with the processing, review, and action of the proposal as well as to provide you with an opportunity to meet with the developer and ask specific questions related to the project in advance of the public hearing. 275 The NIM has been scheduled as follows: Date: April 8, 2015 Time: 5:30 to 7:00 p.m. Location: Lower Level — Conference Room Number 4 West Campus Office Building (W.C.O.B.) 131 West Margaret Lane Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 A map has been attached denoting the location of the West Campus Office Building. If you require additional assistance, please contact a Department staff member at (919) 245 -2575. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Subject Parcel T PIN 9835 -74 -8573 Alana Ennis Property approx 112 acres in area / Zoned Rural Residential (R -1) y, Upper Eno Protected Watershed Overlay ENE -r f i' t• ENS NES w D U" PIN #:9835748573 ALANA M ENNIS 4209 PIN OAK DR DURHAM, NC 27707 ! RGB ® Red: Band _1 - Green: Band-2 - Blue: Band-3 k JIM • j- g------ - - - - -- �G 2 n m rn ; {, Saw Z ' BSS i 4 I , NC 54 W I C.D N 1 inch = 600 feel O 0 500 Orange County Planning and Inspections Departa 03/23/2015 1,0 0 -_�- - - - - - - - - - "r � At fy YfM ti` "ewMrhY I , I ' I ' I ' I ' I ' I ' I ' irk f f�k , , �14; PQDP®��� t �\ erg it sI , ° If I °E U pW : C-Q Ozz J Wk� >Q O Z J LL J gpcn �� LU �coQ Q� cc QUO = � � 4 U A ----------- p Cr r-9 f, rn V e-9 r r Ln e-q .ru 0 15:1 M E3 ru Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) 1=3 Total Postage & Fees 1 $ 1 1 rn WALTER HARDCASTLE 1001 FRAZIER RD G3 MEBANE, NC 273027564 rN-- "alau % ,,,I AJI log ru REMUS , SER" 10. 1110 3, r- Postage Certified Fee ru fi C3 Return Recei Fee C3 Endorsement Re ulred) (Endorsement Restricted Deli Restricted Deliv fy, fee :Endorsement R jdjlr'ed), MM T f-1 Postaw 4,Fees rn ALANA ENNIS 4319 PIN OAK DR Durham, NC 27707— Postmark Here ............. ------------------ rn ru P r- ",w osta Certified F ru Return R 0 H4'p , r Postma rk (En 'rso men , e � I Here R I rz] k—l"V-11'ani required) ru CU Tote, er p & Fec rn Post, ENO�pOdEesUBDIVISION HOME"" 15=1 OWNERS ASSOC INC 0 5523 WALL ST MEBANE, NC 27302 'g -0 ru ril t,-q Lrj ra rij Postmark M Return Receipt Fee Here M (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fe (Endorsement Required) ru M Total Postaue & l=ees rn LINDA F GANT r- 1013 FRAZIER RD MEBANE, NC 27302 01W 11 ru 'u Postage $ Corli tied Fee rij M Return Reoelpt'Fee k Postmark M (Endorsement Required) Here C3 Restricted Delivery Fee (z) (Endorsement Required) M . M DIANE BROWN r- BOX 83 rn r=1 EFLAND, NC 272430083 --------- m , U, n , du ffill ru A 21- ra r- Postage $ Certified Fee ru Postma rks rk eRece"'t Fee Here (En '.me tpd qu ired) Royyyyyy Feb n 'so., t Eequired) ru M BOBBY LEE CRISP PO BOX 114 MEBANE, NC 27302 h 8 ra 0.Ili�tluiI T� �, • , e - , e Orly �; rni l r` �'ostagei $ Cerl(lied Fee ru ___ Postmark Cm Return Receipt fee Here M (Endorsement Ret(uued) Restricted Deiwer)1'1, a. (Endorsement Required) ru n _ r W UE H E MOSS r- ALMA B MOSS 19820 SW 240 ST -- 0 r` HOMESTEAD, FL 33031 ___ ____________ 11�n, �o; �imn��rrrrrini�numrs; ri�n��f�ifrm- aT! i��! rlrPatnrinrlfrrri�AHlI R% �i F19D161�frRItDIIpIIIIViUD111lII�IIIYT�fI�i� ,thr"�ii�i�i�u���' ' J a� a l��r�r'rv��iinvrhnmu m�rm a .. s�zn�i n I�ostaga,�' QedlFled Fee,,. _a ,U 6:3 . Return ReceiCt Fee C7' (EndorsementRe(ju(red) V3 Restricted delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) ,. ru M _ .. Total po ts- 5ETTLE ETAL D M JOHN K SETTLE C= ROBERT HYWOOD DR C= r` 1 609 GREENSBORO, NC 27409, �° p� I T1 n° i 1 4i i We L r a postage fi$ i Certified Fern. ppstmark ni M Return Receipt Feo '`Pere (Endorsement Required) \. C� Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required)° ru Total Postaee E Fees T rn DANIEL LEE STEENWYK C`- RUTH M STEENWYK __ _____ _ _____ 915 N FRAZIER RD r` MEBANE, NC 27302 � 0 WI IN Ih� SIP I 1 q I ru 11� ru Y � Vn r 7 Postage :3- cool led Fee %. Postmark F Here ru Return Receipt Fee C-3 (Endorsement Requited) = C3 Restricted Delivery Fee ((Endorsement Regrured)9 - C:� rn KENNETH R WOODS Sf t, LEATRICE WOODS 1017 FRAZIER RD r� MEBANE, NC 273027564 r flu w /sy //la ®�' / tW 1�iu�� @1 uW+a L= II IIIY 8 R�Ak U71. A /All ✓/rtµN }IrI�A, IY .111 ' C� ru ,n 177. r- Postage $ Certified Fe ru rj Return Receipt Fe C3 (Endorsement Required), Restricted Delivery Fee "� � (Endorsement Required) "M. ru �... r:1 Total Postage & Fees to rn _ ROIBC PEN S CO TRU: r` IRA ACCT r� t 700 RICHMO r� MEBANE, _ N ND RD ------- - - - - - -- 27302 -------- - C rn� g1 r\ �APd¢ d t l m�ei° s0 vr� o q � _�.�. r` Po lays $ Car Mad Fee ru G ] Return RectlfP Feea` , Postmark CD (Endorsement Requtred� Mere C� Restricted Delivery (`q6'; " ' (Endorsement Required) , ru C:j r,fn] rn WILMA VAUGHN RILEY r- 1000 FRAZIER RD MEBANE, NC 27302 ---- - -° ---- r — rurUrrr� ~+ / Postage $ Certifipd Fee ark Pest m Return Receipt Fee orsemeni Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (End orsement Required) ru Mebane, NC 7302 � r- 1205 FAYE Postage $ ,d Fee Here Restricted Delivery Fee E:3 (Endorsoment Required) ru o p � � � p Postage $ � Certified Fo6 ru o ` ' Postmark o '~~ o Requ cz (Endorsement ru cz m LUYOS�D� r- ^ CDHOGUE III TRUSTEE cz 7719US70E � ----- � Mebane, NC 27302 �� �`Ak to � rA Ln � p- ^ Cerlifled Fee ru - ' Return o m�m M (Endorsement m, /�j) Hem cz cz (Endorsement Required) ru / m DONALD uwmCx ' p `,'L,A"M~C^ cz -2 - cz -^''^^~�""" �~ r- MEBANE, NC 27302 -~ ^r`^ � � � � Ott Ln ru Certified Foe cz cz ' ` Postmark ���m *ere Restricted Del��ety Fe' 6 � ' c5 (Endorsement ru / cz ' ^ ' nn CONN|E L FVV|LSON p- 1236 RED GATE RD o o � � Ln ..13 ,. :1 Ln � � � ru o o o o m o m STEVEVVEL0w�- /" , �'�~ p- 4605 OLD GREENSBORO RD m CHAPEL HILL, NC275l68586 p rrm a � a IIII I !MI its NKM ''' Y M � � Yh1 II Nn I Ae o� IIIg} 0 i l F a Postage Certified f=ee lJ Postmark :1 Return Receipt Feer Here (Endorsement Requlr9d) , Restricted Delivery Ptee (Endorsement Requll c!) ' i Total Pnstane & Fe`es n NATASHA U'QAIOVA ROBERT DEKROON 1250 RED GATE RD Mebane, NC 27302 II // e �1 p IAI A I t A tl t.. 1 N� r p7MA 6 °% wuw Irinn!I'V�Vr�'XY F ° Postage (e, } C;ortlilad f=ee j � t+ Patmd�lt„ I Return Receipt Fee I i re r �] (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) `lJ f PATRICIA R ENOCH rn 1201 FRAZIER RD MEBANE, NC 273028580 r�— �/Jrr mNluurnadmmaummw u, + °m�.. ..,.._.,. �f I -fPu 1 I �� Alrr(bl II sl K u iii. min /rht l � IfiP! fll�l I a( u% !u@mN o 1 lul I II II ° II i ° Ntl ° ' -- _ r� Postage" $ Certified FelE ru 999 Posfmark Return Receipt Fe`s, C� (Endorsement Required) Here Restricted Delivery Fee ',[", (Endorsement Required) ru M Tnfal P- M ISSAC REUBEN KETTEMAN r- MISTY KETTEMAN C1 1200 FAYE ST rl_ EFLAND, NC 27243 A 6� dr ti' w � .J3 17 I{'.1 ° ,°1 ra ENTIV r` Pos{�ge 999999 Cr rtifie�l Fee ru _ M Return Recelot Fee (Postmark M (Endorsement Required) Here Restricted Delivery Fee r� (Endorsement Required) C=j - 1 P—t— R Fees :U rn JUDY L CAPPA r•- VENUS C MAHAN 1 r Ci 402 TRUMPET CT { r` I; MEBANE, NC 27302 Iff(IIYi�'A171Qt YMISWJa�ll"WrIlllAN & 11n11 G1Nis 1✓VI17s 281 ^I j1m��1p F1'sfl1''U1� +I� �NuA er �G�it,5WBUFIJAft nt ^WYAWb� �I�Mp .. � 4n oIMM Win mWl WN! � pIR � IVIU ''° m ru �- ,� � ° YY�I � {All ° INa�.. � I m i�° � 4 1I+I�. 'uLS,I � P • ° ° lip 0 ° d. r I Certified Fee z Return Receipt Fee Required) 0 rt Postage 0 Restricted Delivery Fee � (Endorsement Required) Certified Fee ru 0 M Return Receipt Fee Postmark M (Endorsement Required) Here C= ^ Restricted Delivery Fee Endorsement Re rdreCi l C� r� rij m TERRI A RUSS r`- 1110 RED GATE RD _....._._._._._..._.. rn Mebane, NC 27302 rfN�Ti. %'1 Xlr!/!I � . rnmm,;rrr� mmtnnavnr�amnmrrmmiirmrmmrnemrmmt;: �urnnri¢ uvmrriizmnmti irrasrpnrnearm{ n�rrlrnrll� ,ml�r��la�Yllff'III�IXYi�, A 6� dr ti' w � .J3 17 I{'.1 ° ,°1 ra ENTIV r` Pos{�ge 999999 Cr rtifie�l Fee ru _ M Return Recelot Fee (Postmark M (Endorsement Required) Here Restricted Delivery Fee r� (Endorsement Required) C=j - 1 P—t— R Fees :U rn JUDY L CAPPA r•- VENUS C MAHAN 1 r Ci 402 TRUMPET CT { r` I; MEBANE, NC 27302 Iff(IIYi�'A171Qt YMISWJa�ll"WrIlllAN & 11n11 G1Nis 1✓VI17s rr- ^I j1m��1p F1'sfl1''U1� +I� �NuA er �G�it,5WBUFIJAft nt ^WYAWb� ra .. 4n ra rt Postage , 7' Certified Fee ru r: Return Receipt Fee Required) 0 (Endorsement 0 Restricted Delivery Fee � (Endorsement Required) 0 T 5 1 Pagtana & Fees rn JAMES C HAWKINS SR r,.- 1206 FAYE ST c� EFLAND, NC 27243 C� r� A 6� dr ti' w � .J3 17 I{'.1 ° ,°1 ra ENTIV r` Pos{�ge 999999 Cr rtifie�l Fee ru _ M Return Recelot Fee (Postmark M (Endorsement Required) Here Restricted Delivery Fee r� (Endorsement Required) C=j - 1 P—t— R Fees :U rn JUDY L CAPPA r•- VENUS C MAHAN 1 r Ci 402 TRUMPET CT { r` I; MEBANE, NC 27302 I w"WHI-1,1111, Nor an ww'lf 0,11 Postage $ Certified Fee Return Recall)[ Fee (Encloisement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endor��ment Required) Total PQsu'00 & Fees SHERRY HESTER FRAZ MEBANE, NC 27302 0, � - 71grafg" If, � postage _~ � � �� p�mpm ` Certified x°* � '~—' cz °~~-- n°quoed) � Restricted Delivery Fee' (End.rsernont Requited) rij � �^ Fees C-' TEENALESSU JOSE LESSO m tz 1150 RED GATE RD o p- MEBANE, NC 3U2 rl� � � hj � jp � � r^ Postage wm�«mm ru cz turn Recelpt Fee \ Postmark M Required) ) Here Restricted Delivery Fee cz neqaao ru cz Total p"m"=urw^/s m HENRY LJONES p- FANN|EJONE5 cz 907FRAZ|ERRD --- p MEBANE, NC 27302 WWI m ii IN Postage $ Certified Fee � � � � � p � ru Return Receipt Fee � M Required) Here Restricted Delivery Fee cz ,~~~~'~^~q~^~" ru cz Total Postage & Fees |`. rn `- p' LAURA �~------ cz 4U4 TRUMPET CT K4E8ANE,NC27302 | � | w m � � � � 7 postage � r � ru o Return RecalPt Fee CD (Endorsement Requited) �— Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) m C3 m r- cz \ cz \ r- \ o � � � p- - 16, SHELIAH LPANlMEK 1010 FKAIERKD ._______' Postage\ , � m Posit ^ o Return Receipt Fee "e" o (Endorso'ie"=tired) cz Restricted 1) "T y Fee / cz ` � ru C� ', WILLIAM BRUCE RICHMOND PHYLLIS 8 RICHMOND � ~ cz 32SAGAK4DRELANE o r- GREENVULE,SC296O75Ol6 k ;,N I I R I�uti� III I rr l II lr Ilr x, „„ �I VV 8 0 a'P t� m „ otn I P ® m II - em a �n�� mew a •,, I� ) ral sfr1 � ��f1 uG4a p Postage �$ Certified Feo� r Post mik �- [lore 3 Return Receipt Feel (Endorsement Required)t 3 Restricted Delivery Fee •� (Endorsement Required) . n MARGARET RUDD BISHOP P 0 BOX 10546 ................ . SOUTHPORT, NC 284610546 �o hla rmnmtt / nrrv�/ ' aetmmrdU�l,+ �u9ulY�^; 7r�r/ �1N/ ll/ 71kii�Y7 �W' 1�' R6�A14UfINI> 9d0�It�1lIIINli7 �Nl1NI1UYUA17�11:�YUiS�1uG.��II 11�G I a I�' � ���� Ry, M., rn I ra Postage _._ Certified Fee ru C� IPpI siark Pe e Relurn Receipt ler (� (Endorsement Regwred) C� Restricted Delivery Fee G u. (Endorsement Required) t rU rzi rn JOSEPH JR SPE PEW� AK r- KAREN SPEWAK rn 408 TRUMPET CT _. r` MEBANE, NC 27302 E. 1� .�.. ul Ivd) A INA` Ihllll W Rll 19x I., • IW v. d!1N I fN II i (. 1M7! u a 91 'A I IrH I �6. ru Postage' Celiified Fee rU -- Postmark C� Return Receipt Fee Here (Endorsement Required) p Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) ru HOWARD MATTHEW.,MEL�/IIV.I r� ELLEN SUE MELVIN i 1108 FRAZIER RD C.7 r` MEBANE, NC 273027565 r I , ,., ,ar ra I ���� iun I1 ,I�rl �I��t��Nlil � I�, ����Ib�r�u �•4�;y' I "�, x d C ®aIN AA A m p �i(• Iso ®+ u � � p +„ lll. I�➢ dfll I � IIw711 I MII lei I i - - ° ° g rn L Lt1 ._. _._._ ._# -__.- ra r\- Postage Certified Fee PoshnatJ< ru C=J Return Receipt Fee Here Id (Endorsement Required) ¢ ! d � Restricted Delivery Fee G= (Endorsement Required) r1j to uUC,t. ((,.�u`,+ i• •:f rn DOROTHY ELAINE MASSEY r.- 1100 FRAZIER RD _______ MEBANE, NC 273027 565A� r�— I ®Inr� wre rou w Nua 'N r � ¢+u rnIpIY r,' + ,•rsa�...�., r` Postage $ f k _ (iertifleG9 Fee F � % ru C� Return Receipt Fee �•,NPoshnadr Here (Endorsement Required) � r Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) rU g KIMBERLY A VINCENT � th rn 1023 FRAZIER RD r,- MEBANE, NC 2730 e� M., rn I ra Postage _._ Certified Fee ru C� IPpI siark Pe e Relurn Receipt ler (� (Endorsement Regwred) C� Restricted Delivery Fee G u. (Endorsement Required) t rU rzi rn JOSEPH JR SPE PEW� AK r- KAREN SPEWAK rn 408 TRUMPET CT _. r` MEBANE, NC 27302 E. 1� .�.. ul Ivd) A INA` Ihllll W Rll 19x I., • IW v. d!1N I fN II i (. 1M7! u a 91 'A I IrH I �6. ru Postage' Celiified Fee rU -- Postmark C� Return Receipt Fee Here (Endorsement Required) p Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) ru HOWARD MATTHEW.,MEL�/IIV.I r� ELLEN SUE MELVIN i 1108 FRAZIER RD C.7 r` MEBANE, NC 273027565 r I , ,., ,ar ra I ���� iun I1 ,I�rl �I��t��Nlil � I�, ����Ib�r�u �•4�;y' I "�, x d C ®aIN AA A m p �i(• Iso ®+ u � � p +„ lll. I�➢ dfll I � IIw711 I MII lei I i - - ° ° g rn L Lt1 ._. _._._ ._# -__.- ra r\- Postage Certified Fee PoshnatJ< ru C=J Return Receipt Fee Here Id (Endorsement Required) ¢ ! d � Restricted Delivery Fee G= (Endorsement Required) r1j to uUC,t. ((,.�u`,+ i• •:f rn DOROTHY ELAINE MASSEY r.- 1100 FRAZIER RD _______ MEBANE, NC 273027 565A� r�— LF) rr M Ln � � Postage ru Certified Fee cz ^� Return Receipt pee (Endorsement Required) o cz Restricted D m* (Endorsement Required) ru cz rn BENNYCR/SP . /PO BOX 163 o' MEBANE, NC 27302 jjjjjjjjjj postage C3 (Endorsement ReqUiled) Fee C=1 p,,,u,tdDellV0ry, (Endorsement Requ're \p,71E?\ RD 0275651111,, � ff Certified Fee Postmark ru 0 REAUru Receipt Fee t7i (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee �mon��e" Required) ' ~ cz | ru M BETTY ETALVVALLER p cz cz r- / en Z43 m � � � p � postage _ Certified Fee e ru M � Return Receipt Fee Cj cz Required) -- ~~~ (Endorsement Required) ro ^' ^^ TN.,p.°.—^=..~/(k | `� /'/ HENRY LEE JONES ~4� p- o 1611 BEN JONES DR ~ y^ o MEDANE,NC273027563 ------J Z,111�11111111 11 postage $ coollied Fee ru 0 Fwurn Receipt Fee Restricted Delrve�Yil`00 ru S503 ALTON CT tZI MEBANE, NC 27 Administration (919) 245-2575 00 Attachment Craig N. Benedict, AICP, Director ,w 285 131 W. Margaret Lane Suite 201 P. • Box 8181 Hillsborough, 1 . - i • • . ' • I, Michael D. Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor with Orange County, North Carolina, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.8.7 and 2.9.2 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) I have mailed, or have caused to be mailed, a Notice of Public Hearing regarding the processing of a Zoning Atlas Amendment application submitted by Hart's Mill LLC and Alana Ennis to rezone a 112 acre parcel of property to Master Planned Development Conditional Zoning (MPD -CZ) to allow for the development of village style residential development and farm on a parcel of property identified utilizing Orange County Parcel Identification Number (PIN) 9835 -74 -8573 within the Cheeks Township of Orange County. The owners were identified according to the Tax Records and as required by the UDO. The mailed notice specified the date, time, place and subject of the Public Hearing. WITNESS my hand, this 8t" day of May, 2015. Mi hael D. Ha ey, AICP Current Planning Supervisor Current Planning (919) 245-2575 • 644-3002 1, • • 1125,11m, I/yjj vane � May 8, 2015 • Craig N. Benedict, 0�p�,ry�gY�" 1"" %$��p�u�v�p���� �'�w�p�urv� �a.� '�,roro( QIn „,Y R Margaret Suite I� 1 P. • Box MR RE: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING — REVIEW of a rezoning petition to change zoning of property from Rural Residential (R -1) to Master Planned Development Conditional Zone (MPD -CZ) to allow for the development of approximately 34 residential dwelling units on a 112 acre parcel of property (PIN 9835 -74 -8573) The Orange County Planning Department has received a Zoning Atlas Amendment application, submitted by Heart's Mill LLC and Ms. Alana Ennis, proposing the rezoning of a 112 acre parcel of property: FROM: Rural Residential (R -1), Upper Eno Protected Watershed Protection Overlay District TO: Master Planned Development Conditional Zoning (MPD -CZ) Hearts Mill, Upper Eno Protected Watershed Protection Overlay District allowing for the development of Hearts Mill Village. A color rendering of the project and site plan are included for informational purposes. The subject parcel is further identified utilizing Orange County Parcel Identification Number (PIN) 9835 -74 -8573, located within the Cheeks Township of Orange County, and is zoned Rural Residential (R -1) Upper Eno Protected Watershed Overlay District. Please refer to the attached vicinity map for additional site information and location details. The proposed project is a village style development with approximately 34 dwelling units and involve the preservation of approximately 67 acres of the parcel (approximately 60 %) as vegetative open space and farm area (i.e. pasture and crop production). Residences are proposed to range from 1 to 3 bedroom units clustered around a pedestrian trail in the middle of the property surrounded by identified open space /farm areas. A common house, a shared facility approximately 3,000 sq. ft. in area, is proposed to be developed as a place where residents and their guests can meet for community meals, entertainment, and mail pick -up. In accordance with Section 2.7 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), the County is required to notify property owners within 500 feet of the request that an application has been filed and that a Public Hearing will be conducted as part of the review process. The Public Hearing for this item is scheduled for May 26, 287 2015. As a property owner within 500 feet of the request, you have the right to address the Board of County commissioners (BOCC) and Planning Board concerning this request. The Public Hearing to review this case is scheduled for Tuesday, May 26, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. in Orange County Whitted Human Services Center Complex, 300 West Tryon Street, Hillsborough, NC 27278. The case will be referred to the Orange County Planning Board for its review and recommendation with the BOCC taking final action on the application at a future meeting. It should be remembered that the review of all SUP applications are carried out in a quasi-judicial format, meaning that decisions relating to the approval or denial of a application are based solely on the sworn testimony of all parties involved with the case, both those for and against an application, as well as the review of competent material and substantial evidence submitted during the public hearing. While County regulations and State law do not require that parties be represented by an attorney, it may be in your best interests to secure legal council to represent your interests at the hearing. Further the applicant has the burden of establishing, by the submission of competent material and substantial evidence, the existence of facts and conditions that demonstrate the projects compliance with the various requirements and standards detailed within the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). Those opposing approval of the application shall have the burden of establishing, also through the submission of competent material and substantial evidence, the specific manner in which the proposal does not satisfy the requirements for approval of the application. As previously indicated, the BOCC shall render a decision only on the sworn testimony of all parties and on the competent material and substantial evidence submitted during the hearing. Agenda packet materials for the May 26, 2015 Quarterly Public Hearing shall be posted on the Orange County website by May 15, 2015 and can be found at the following link: htt J/ uv.oran ecountync.c�ov /departments /board of ccur�t rnmissioners /wend h. If you have any questions concerning this request, please contact staff at (919) 245 -2575. Sincerely, Mic ae .. ICP, CFM, CZO Orange County Planning Attachments: Preliminary Site Plan Vicinity Map of Property Vicinity Map of Meeting Location RGB ® Red: Band-1 - Green: Band _2 - Blue: Band-3 1 inch= 582 feel 0 500 Orange County Planning and Inspections Department 03/27/2015 n O D ozCl) CO n DC~r] pry N �- O� m zoz m, N �y�ICI 4 I� I ;I I ,• I I }I �I 1 aQi1.. 8i I .;i ■ Y, t �y 4; y' �3 I / I / I I I I I I I i� �1 J J '_Ir WE :• 290 ca Ju M r- x, 'rn' 291 I = -- - - - - - -- " I I ,1 \`1 I --------- - �S `. \ ___ motif Qa' p F7ec f oaoo £ ICI -J I A g ° ------------ _� - - -- f z / r I --- - \ -- Lj I i i a,j ________ ----------- - - - - - -- rN (j) "g R Or 2 �mr —1�7Df7l _ D j co�z m 291 292 mill § m �oz in I �� of f � (zllZ co i�j 293 I �\ Y I O.� O- � _ N N(irj a n m >I r m��-�z cz T wCS�. DcanEV 09. Nth 1.b31AU auxwxa c waorzcrs��. w,uea..uw: e�.rorn_�,m r Boa mm urart. ncrrrezoves usrn rw•e nx�n. eoeer Whitted Building (300 W. Tryon St.) 295 , .' 11 1 i h r '' Parking, POW . LU ,^ • � _r" . x ice- �; �' �' , � ;� -� __ - , - -- , A � � � ,' A Z I ' } Whit ted - 1 Building -�.. raw tR, _ r �� ►�������v�a-s+�ar�r�ierfIft' W TRYON ST ' r � � `'j 1 in = 100 feet o mFeet �" Orange County Planning and Inspections a r i Brian Carson (5/8/2015) Comified Fdt:, Fbitom Rory iipt Ff'' M"'Afjcfod D(flivmy 1: er" Wridoisomwit Rwjoirod� SHERRY HESTER CALVIN D NESTER I 101 FRAZIER RD MEBANE, NC 27302 r p(tti.mmfk t kv� 0 NS, SR. T. C 27243 $9 F (Endart�0MOM tOquilred) R o stv eA ixi D live f1dor t:nra?rak it eliau; Ml A C. F ro RJ """f20,64 -I- EFLANr or ru otj-;sit p(tti.mmfk t kv� 0 NS, SR. T. C 27243 a r r e� • X4.6 w w w "e7e'1 w fint�s�n nnr.ultr'N�Y Int nettlirlrt r �` 41�er�a (Enf1V nson H olrided Ddivrry Felf) p (rndm;l,, rti(lnt Re Quir0d) ro TERRI A. RUSS o' ,r,,e,,P(mt I 110 RED GATE RD = an l" MEBANE, NC 27302 O 1:`P�i�r(P t!4�atgn ( or 110 BoK t �i'ry, t aW, qC6 '1 17 a 200 • w w w w • 200 a rr .0 �a co w � Ir NU ni cc ,� n y Ej _ a - r' — r�fe ;rYirarb, rro Pin.,h u;to- tf i7r Ini Fr o d (f n�lfrr ;urne,itt f�r�e'driln tl) .,�^ ^"" ru r- m TSA DEVELOPMENT, LLC Ln ru 5523 WALL ST. C 4a�Ptaari 4;r; raflpt p �e� MEBANE, NC 27302 r-9 Godifled ow 1 1:3 cr W 4U^ Prid➢f r0 V�r,l�,rrf inrp e, a / \ t _ p O r�l. ^ill(T4 riC 1 "1M I'7`i 1 "'SPY (Q CICiff l riovil RcjgilNo , f 1oro Q ro ru NATASHA,,,,UDAIOVA Picr P1«`tY,ri Dolivoiy Tun , ROBERT DEKROON -� O (d I lor,ffam;M Ra,quired) ED "No r' �°M � � CONNIE P:w' ' T SON w (10bc ,, Mebane, NC 27302 RED RD7 N 560 o _ . or W w a co rr co w � Ir NU ni .� rq f ,� n y Ej _ a - r' — r�fe ;rYirarb, Yy ✓. Pin.,h u;to- tf i7r Ini Fr o d (f n�lfrr ;urne,itt f�r�e'driln tl) .,�^ ^"" r- m TSA DEVELOPMENT, LLC ru 5523 WALL ST. C 4a�Ptaari 4;r; raflpt p �e� MEBANE, NC 27302 `�,, r-1 1 1:3 W 4U^ Prid➢f r0 V�r,l�,rrf inrp e, a / \ t _ p ' // frrU49 � S /�1,fJ `r`R (f C✓1) sYf(r�a�Y� r1�N ( W,rl , . r it r lW NIN 60 r .. .. ul ru d fAIIJf f� � ,il .. r✓ C 4a�Ptaari 4;r; raflpt p �e� `�,, � 0'41[at r� W 4U^ Prid➢f r0 V�r,l�,rrf inrp e, a / \ t _ p (P uthrra,varv�rr�C nte;gi.nra elp ro ru NATASHA,,,,UDAIOVA ROBERT DEKROON -� 1250 RED GATE RD ED "No r' �°M � - -� r- w (10bc ,, Mebane, NC 27302 („ Pr; m ro � rr Nw 0 l �y ar r� ru d➢ "tert6�'yl'p .n ni .4.. Ln � t' "' i'fb.i(Y1'YEArk E3 Fia om Pita r.0 d seer (f'indrlr.,,attut7nt Fta,Y, uirv.rR } iY �p Hum � Caitifind t" o, Restricted ted Dolivnrp Poo r 1 Foo .... ... t'wa=,trtlmk p (4'eidrrr,r;rn r1CRequired) V -0rtlurrl nuapk F'['r4a U 0 =o JERNIKA LOWERY/ ru rr 5503 ALTON CT {t tPlCtttl(i DolivY ry t MEBANE, NC 27302 (� (4.rldur ;C)f71Cd r1v {it Ptllil V3C {� .. w °R W & ( Yn Cric,90 d Ddve4y Fee r r Q jw- ru" d WALTER RD A/i/ 1001 FRAZIER o cO Obi III I m ro � me l �y ar r� ni Ln Ir ru Ln Caitifind t" o, r 1 Foo .... ... t'wa=,trtlmk f'Yertunr Rrrc,IpiFoo C� � V -0rtlurrl nuapk F'['r4a U 0 (I'.Y1dC)r7ro3WT1 G)11t 4iY quirfied) Here, {t tPlCtttl(i DolivY ry t (� (4.rldur ;C)f71Cd r1v {it Ptllil V3C {� .. w °R W & ( Yn Cric,90 d Ddve4y Fee r Q (F'nd(ii ¢,ernentRwjo)rc'di ��"� "- WALTER RD 1001 FRAZIER o cO 'Tnteni r r' a)r1.10 B rU ..cl'l y. d. �l n'I s � WILMA VAUGHN RILEY rtnt Irk �.. ra 1000 FRAZIER RD. .. ,...... -. orPO13 MEBANE, NC 27302 City, ;itfze _,... r� ro � me l �y ar Ln Ir ru U'1 r 1 Foo .... ... t'wa=,trtlmk � C� � V -0rtlurrl nuapk F'['r4a U (1 rtdt>r. u�rrn(',irt p1equirod) °.rcn F {t tPlCtttl(i DolivY ry t (� (4.rldur ;C)f71Cd r1v {it Ptllil V3C {� .. w °R W & 4 , r ru i1)Y iC { HR TLF ��"� "- WALTER RD 1001 FRAZIER o r MEBANE, NC 27302-7564 r' a)r1.10 B ..cl'l y. d. �l n'I ni Ln A `n m Ir ru ru ro ru m ,mom ~ww Ln P _ fU C r rPiPi , p f °r,r h %/ f r—1 t .. k, 4r Y'G�ttarrr GCr a argr¢ C "u.er �� �� (t r}(tC51 SVi! "Y14J�Yi Fi eCjld lP t3i1) „9 3 �"r,rt' „Crt�rarbE / 0� @`APPS m tg frlGiplC�FldJt18!'}t' ^f;C4 m� ea r EE C1 PI F3Ea$BY LEE (El PO BOX1�4 Ln ro ni � ALANA ENNIS o y(rr 4319 PIN OAK DR r` orll DURAHM, NC 27707 Hrarn ni Ln A `n m Ir ru Q" Fo >;rriwk 4tr�Vrtrtr�IlriaagrCli,t+ f °- A (t�' 0UY f I11 17f f^thiS,�PJIf t'ltj ^`,�„'�° - 6t. O fU _...... _ - a G” olivegy F (,o E 'k�lr � Gl ( p�r��s,trit',r��FiarFtraCrrxr6} r loWl nj ea r EE C1 PI F3Ea$BY LEE PO BOX1�4 Ln r "ty' , � ( `, CtrtitinrSF (Et wlrrra nrtarntrtiruYcj1 Hrarn riostricted Dolivewy Fee p (c rr +a r;,fsm rrrt Ho(lrmirod) co ni '1091 11, f ENO RIDGE SUBDIVISION HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. O frrePY, r` r >tPOf,xc 5523 WALL ST. ''", rkAi MEBANE, NC 27302 co rn `n m Ir ru Fo >;rriwk 4tr�Vrtrtr�IlriaagrCli,t+ f °- A (t�' 0UY f I11 17f f^thiS,�PJIf t'ltj ^`,�„'�° - 6t. O Here _...... _ - a G” olivegy F (,o E 'k�lr � Gl ( p�r��s,trit',r��FiarFtraCrrxr6} r loWl nj ea r EE C1 PI F3Ea$BY LEE PO BOX1�4 ff :tiC'Pii nc> �C 27302 M'BA r "ty' , P- -0 0 1:0 Ir nj r U') Flotmo Rocelpt Foo Ru(julrod) Rest Ved Dol lv�' V Foe � rieni < C( 1:0 nj -I- C ry, 'stle' M r- >MITH ETAL 11F III TDI lQrur- a- ni U-) 17-9 C"oliifiod Feo , iultUM Receipt Fovi r n'i omumcnt Flwjuliad) r-1 Roslriclod Dodiver/ F:'(,e E3 Required) nj HOWA� EL _a r'-m �p' Er �101111'M H ill,i nj I'`' F'"rsr4rtetef Lrl Gl�Oifiod Foo C3 tllehjrn fla,�"OA Fc,, el i (Eniloisomt Fwquira�j Hem Flontrir,lod Delively Foo (Grvimairnonl Roquired 90 ru u H. E. MOSS A B. MS S 20 SW 240',�'$ 19, ,T 'c'ity" H HOM ISTEAD, a- ni U-) 17-9 C"oliifiod Feo , iultUM Receipt Fovi r n'i omumcnt Flwjuliad) r-1 Roslriclod Dodiver/ F:'(,e E3 Required) nj HOWA� EL rr m i-n Ir ro O'd t' ni FR. ANCINE R. MASSEY r-q H 20 FRAZIER RD MEBANE, NC 27302-7565 iW m ul w Codified FQRr'} � �1� u �µ dM$VLI7fi.r4t R(Autrifl aeOptFou i / E3 (6irralo(isementFioquurd) 4 ro f €iti w ru ;tx JOSEPH SPEWAK, JR KAREN SPEWAK O ._....... eire,e 408 TRUMPET CT _. MEBANE, NC 27302 v s:at e ,%girl 303 ate-, Ir ru Ln fF M co aYakww fU ,._.CAROCYN R. F'ORREST 1705 FAYE ST EFLAND, NC 27243 �