HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 06-06-1994 - VIII-E 1
O R A N G E C O U N T Y
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: June 6. 1994
Action Agenda
Item
SUBJECT: HICKORY HILL - PRELIMINARY PLAN
ACTION BY: July 21, 1994
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes x No
ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: Eddie Kirk
Resolution of Approval Extension 2582
Application TELEPHONE NUMBERS:
vicinity Map Hillsborough - 732-8181
Fiscal Impact Analysis Durham - 688-7331
Preliminary Plan Mebane - 227-2031
5/16/94 Draft Planning Board Chapel Hill - 967-9251
Minutes
PURPOSE: Consideration of the Preliminary Plan for Hickory Hill.
BACKGROUND: The property is located in Eno Township on the northeast
side of Palmer's Grove Church Road (SR 1582) . It is zoned
Agricultural Residential and L-Eno-PW. It is designated
Agricultural Residential and Lower Eno Watershed in the
Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan for Orange
County.
Land uses in the area include Spirit Hill Subdivision and
other single family lots. The subdivision will be served
by individual wells and septic tanks.
The total acreage of the tract is 20. 34 acres. Sixteen
(16) lots are proposed that average 1. 15 acres in size.
The lots all front on Mary E. Cook Drive which is proposed
to be public and constructed to State standards. Mary E.
Cook Drive follows an existing private right-of-way and
extends north off of Palmer's Grove Church Road. Palmer's
Grove Church Road is a paved secondary State road.
The Planning Board reviewed and approved the Concept Plan
for Hickory Hill at its January 24, 1994 meeting with the
condition that all lots must receive access from Mary E.
Cook Drive.
z
A portion of the right-of-way for Mary E. Cook Road
crosses Lot 3 of Spirit Hill Subdivision, located east and
south of Hickory Hill. In order for the dedication of
that portion of the right-of-way to occur, the owner of
Lot 3 of Spirit Hill must sign the Final Plat for Hickory
Hill. It has been the general practice of Orange County
to extend lot lines to the center of the road easement for
private roads, but only to the edge of the right-of-way
for public roads. In keeping with this practice, it would
be desirable for the Final Plat to include a recombination
of Lot 3 of Spirit Hill to move the lot line to the
eastern edge of the right-of-way for Mary E. Cook Road.
However, if the owner of Lot 3 does not wish to have the
lot line changed, then it can remain in its current
location within the right-of-way without affecting the
public road dedication.
On May 16, 1994, the Planning Board recommended approval
of the Preliminary Plan with the exception of Condition B7
in the Resolution of Approval which states "Provided it is
acceptable with the owners of Lot 3 of Spirit Hill
Subdivision, the property in the right-of-way of Mary E.
Cook Road on Lot 3 should be recombined with the property
in Hickory Hill. " The Planning Board recommended that the
condition be eliminated because the recombination is
contingent on the preference of the owner of Lot 3 , and
the condition may or may not be met.
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends approval of the attached
Resolution of Approval for Hickory Hill Subdivision,
including item B7. Although recombination of Lot 3 and
the right-of-way is not firmly required, inclusion of B7
would assure that the subdivider was aware of the
preference to match the property line with the edge of the
right-of-way. The issue of property ownership is not,
however, of enough significance to jeopardize the
applicants' ability to record the subdivision.
• RESOLUTION 3
OF THE
ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Date Tune 6. 1994
Name of Subdivision Hickory Hill
Owner/Applicant Wesley Cook
The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves Hickory Hill subdivision preliminary
plat, dated March 23, 1994 and containing 16 lots in Orange County, subject to the
fulfillment of requirements specified herein.
Mary E. Cook Road shall be irrevocably dedicated to the general public and be constructed
to standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. The approval of this
resolution authorizes and directs the Orange County Manager to accept for Orange County
and on behalf of the public generally, the offer of dedication of Mary E. Cook Road. This
acceptance by Orange County of the dedication to the general public of Mary E. Cook Road
shall be without maintenance responsibility. This road shall be maintained by the
owner/applicant until such time as it is accepted for maintenance by the North Carolina
Department of Transportation or some other governmental body. Before the Final Plat of
Hickory Hill can be recorded:
A. Sewage Disposal
1. Each residential lot shall contain an adequate area for septic disposal, and
repair area, approved by the Orange County Division of Environmental
Health.
2. The septic system location may restrict the size and location of improvements.
This disclosure shall be included in a document describing development
restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. The document
shall also disclose that information regarding the tentative location of septic
systems is available from the Orange County Health Department, Division of
Environmental Health.
B. Roads and Access
1. Mary E. Cook Road shall be constructed to standards of the North Carolina
Department of Transportation, within a 50 foot right-of-way, and the
construction shall be inspected and approved by NCDOT.
1
4
OR
A letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond shall be submitted to secure
construction of Mary E. Cook Road to the standards of the North Carolina
Department of Transportation. An estimate of the construction cost must be
prepared by a certified/licensed engineer or grading contractor and submitted
to the Planning and Inspections Department. The financial guarantee must
reflect 110% of that estimate and be issued by an accredited financial
institution licensed to do business in North Carolina.
The document describing development restrictions to be recorded with the
Final Plat shall state that the financial guarantee will not be released until the
road construction has been inspected and approved by NCDOT.
2. Submit an erosion control plan for construction of the road.
3. All lots shall access onto the new subdivision road. This restriction shall be
stated in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to
be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
4. Site triangles at the intersection of Palmers Grove Church Road and Mary E.
Cook Road shall be dedicated as required by NCDOT.
5. All curves shall meet NCDOT right-of-way and radius requirements.
6. The owners of lot 3 of Spirit Hill Subdivision shall sign off on the Final Plat
dedicating the right-of-way for Mary E. Cook Road.
7. Provided it is acceptable with the owners of lot 3 of Spirit Hill Subdivision,
the property in the right-of-way of Mary E. Cook Road on lot 3 should be
recombined with the property in Hickory Hill.
C. Land Use Buffers and Landscaping
1. Landscaping shall be installed or preserved as indicated on the approved
landscape plan, and must be inspected and approved by the Planning and
Inspections Department.
OR
Guaranteed financially through a letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond
submitted to secure.required landscape installation and preservation. An
estimate of the cost for required preservation, plantings and their installation
must be provided. The financial guarantee shall reflect 110 percent of the
estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do
business in North Carolina.
2
-2. Provisions for protection of existing trees as shown on the approved landscape
plan shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and 5
requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with
the Final Plat.
D. Drainage
1. Impervious surface data, as pursuant to Article 6.23.3 of the Zoning
Ordinance shall be included in a document describing development restrictions
and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently
with the Final Plat.
2. A 100 year floodplain and stream buffer along the western property line of lots
1 through 6 as shown on the Preliminary Plan.
E. Parkland
1. Cash in the amount of$1,850.00 [($4,047/acre x 16/35 acre)] shall be paid to
Orange County as payment in lieu of parkland dedication.
F. Miscellaneous
1. The Final Plat shall contain a title block and vicinity map in accordance with
Section V-D-2 and V-D-3 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations.
2. The following rights-of-way shall be shown on the plat:
a. A 60-foot right-of-way shall be provided in lot 12 as shown on the
Preliminary Plan.
b. A 60-foot right-of-way across the back of lots 7 through 11 as shown
on the Preliminary Plan.
G. Certifications
1. A Certificate of Survey and Accuracy signed by a registered Land Surveyor
shall be notarized on the face of the Final Plat.
2. A Certificate of Declaration and Maintenance in the form provided in Section
V-D-6-b of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations signed by the
landowner and developer shall be on the face of the plat and included in a
document describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with
the Final Plat.
3. The Department of Environmental Health shall certify that all residential lots
contain sufficient area for septic tank disposal and repair.
3
6
5. A Certificate of Approval signed by the Orange County Planning and '
Inspections Department.
Signature of Applicant Clerk to the Board
accept the above listed conditions of subdivision approval,
and acknowledge that each must be met prior to recordation of the Final Plat.
4
APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAN APFROVAL
MAJOR SUBDIVISION
8/93
ORANGE COUNTY
- DATE: - 9�
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT (INK ONLY)
SUBDIVISION NAME:
LOCATION: 1��1L/l1�rZ5 0 vre , 2. G�
OWNER/DEVELOPER: &. y SZe-ze Cos
ADDRESS: 2/-10 a44 772, TELEPHONE NO.: Lys{-TOht
••
AGENT/CONTACT: CC . , TELEPHONE NO.: '7.37-3883
A. SUMMARY INFORMATION:
Orange County Tax Map ZO Block Lot(s) Z ,, Z 7 Township 4Aj 0
Zoning District(s): A-Q L-END-PW
Total Number of Acres: c,/ R L Phases:
Total Number of Lots: /e-o Average Lot Size: A Minimum Lot Size: —O. 9'Z
Number/Type of Structures: (existing) (proposed)
Lineal Feet in Streets: 136,0 Acres in Open Space:
Water Supply: Public (specify) Community f Individual
Wastewater Disposal: Public (specify) Community ✓ Individual
School District: Ora n o Firs District: ENO
General Land Uses in Area:
Critical Areas: stream/drainageways flood prone areas
watershed (specify) historic sites
other (explain)
Is the property to be subdivided currently under "farm use value taxation"? Yes_ No_. If "yes",
please contact the Orange County Tax Office. Subdivision of the property may require payment of
deferred taxes under"farm use value taxation
B. All plats must be submitted on sheet no smaller than one inch equals two-hundred feet (1"=200') and
no larger than one inch equals twenty feet (1"=20') and must contain the following information:
<?>:' subdivision name ✓�#� zoning of tract and adjacent.
.� name & address of owners) properties
✓ name & address of subdivider ./ ? *, building setback lines by notation
(if other than owner) or typical lot layout
�%5 .;:;z name of surveyor, engineer,
location and width of existing and
C landscape architect or architect, proposed easements (drainage,
° address, registration /and seal
utilities, roads, etc.)
y ✓ (title) Preliminary Plan existing, proposed and adjoining
° .✓ ' scale, north arrow
�,. " rights-of-way including dimensions
y ° date (including revision dates) and street names and state road
✓ `''.:< township, tax map-block-lot numbers. Lineal feet of road
+J w references centerlines and approximate
•:z Parent Parcel Identification +� acreage of new street rights-of-
-.1�' , dead book and page t of property way
4-4 to be subdivided ' Mi existing and proposed utilities,
co boundary described with bearings including type, sizes, hydrants,
(a E cm. and distances valves, manholes
o co �" .;
U cc ✓`V`s "' total acreage of the tract and /( �" existing and proposed curbs,
Y ° acreage of fats, including and gutters and culverts, including
excluding area within rights-of- suss and grades
way ; location and width of alleys, ,
✓ »: control corner sidewalks, bike lanes, transit
systems, and bus stops
(please complete reverse side)
6
proposed lot lines with dimensions typical street cross-sections and
lot & block numbers intersection details including
phasing lines design and width of travalway and
t000graphy at ton foot (10) shoulders
—4 intervals ✓ horizontal alignment and general
a
0 water bodies, streams, floodway curve data (public roads)
and floodplains centerline radius on all proposed
stream buffers streets
permanent features such as
_hle P# location and size of parcels
U) U dedicated for public use, buildings, cemeteries, historic
.,q
a)E L64 recreational use or reserved in landmarks
4J 4_1
.H 0 common, with purpose noted adjoining lot layout names of
impervious surface data (if located adjoining property owners. If
(D U-4 0 in water supply watershed) subdivided, subdivision plat name,
4J
(V vicinity map showing general plat book & page number, and
4 to perimeter lot numbers.
CL a) location of subdivision with streets
E k and roads identified by State road location and size of lots of
0 W
L) number and name restricted development potential
landscaping and buffer and notation on plat regarding
CD M requirements same
stormwater detention and/or
L) to _.0 township, corporate and extra-
territorial planning jurisdiction lines retention sites and undisturbed
which cross the property areas for infiltration purposes (if
located in water supply
watershed)
C. OTHER SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
1 Twenty-five (25) copies of the preliminary plat.
2. One full size copy of an Orange County Tax map (with tax parcels involved clearly marked in
pencil).
3. Where municipal or OWASA sewer is not available, a copy of the Preliminary Plat indicating
Health Department sails analysis approval/denial for each lot shown thereon.
4. Whore a private road is proposed a written statement by the applicant or his/her authorized
representative which sets forth the justification for a private road (see Section IV-8-3-d-1 of the
Orange County Subdivision Regulations).
5. Auxiliary documents, in draft form, prepared in accordance with Section.VIL of.this Ordinance
which assure completion and/or maintenance of improvements required by this Ordinance.
Such documents may include, but not be limited to, a private road maintenance agreement, and
articles of incorporation and restrictive covenants pertaining to a homeowner's association.
These documents may be required as necessary as evidence that the ordinance requirements
are being mot.
a. Fee - $350.00 plus $5.00 per lot (1 fee for preliminary and final plat).
7. If the subdivision contains 10 lots or more the following information shall be submitted with the
application:
a. Number of years to buildout.
b. Number of houses to be built during each year to buildout.
C. Average price of houses including lots for each year to buildout.
1, the applicant, hereby certify that th orepoi g application is complete and ccur to.
APPLICANT'S GNATURE OWNER'S�VIGNA URE
3 72-31 94(-
DOE DATE
FEES: Amount 3 S Date Paid 3—;2.2 74- Receipt # 0 715".2
TO: Orange County Planning Department 9
FROM: Wesley Cook - Hickory Hill
C. OTHER SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
7. If the subdivision contains 10 lots or more,the following information shall
be submitted with the application:
a. Number of years to buildout.
3 years
b. Number of houses to be built during each year to buildout.
5-6 homes
c. Average price of houses including lots for each year to buildout.
$125,000.00
i
a
10 .
m
%C' O
gy
Cecil
�, AppUcant. 3
.D
22
�. AR a
•49.4960 A
1
?5 AC•GAS` '� 20 6102 4 i "aA"'
O�q 133 AG GAS• 2t
4i . 103 .t56 AG v'9'
t 0.214 aG
IAG •�2+yT `l�� ,LACK ¢RAN _"
Fu
►063 7'T 5E� MPF
`- / Zoe
tg I ,�' pFt1VA g 3
T. AG I7A Tg46 �J cl: I 0a 35,56
a
Fx 1.
pG c Z 10 0 425 PG..
6 g
73�s 8 ;
17H 1, 3
t 4 s ' H a0 .9 %
AC' 's 903
2
+ ( C'
1 .04 AC .r 1
17 G 2201. 3 • ,b A N
� 1
233 ' Z 29C 5923 3 IZ 30� 4 \ 3
.� '' 6028 17F 4 v .0 is 2`�j t 985 .3-T54
150A
674 C
1f 2.22 Ac _. t 9 �. 5.0
8149 1 $9 1 � Z t 3 .92AC• 1 2TAC• 2`J ' 1
L 2;z j„ .98AC
WOODS D�F pKl ' a Ac.. _
AC � N -tg6T: , 28 y 6 29 � 1.09A 00 1
t 17 _ S 2gK
''_.. -----.,,, • 338
A
s Z4 AG 3�6 62 C. 3i 6 63A
C9 � Zoe 065
OATEN`"`- 3 h AT a T
1. 4►t ! t
. 92 1 3H .0 9
C
4 R •�8 T
t'
80 4
.9 ��
1 5 o 9 AG• a
1 1 2 X44 AG g.O
AC'CAL5
t�
26
11
FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR HICKORY HILL SUBDIVISION
RESIDENTIAL SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH
Prepared by
The Orange County Planning Department
May, 1994
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Hickory Hill is a proposed 1 6-lot major subdivision located in Eno Township on the northwest side
of Palmer's Grove Church Road.The average lot size is approximately 1.15 acres. All lots will be served
by individual wells and septic tanks, and public roads.
For Hickory Hill, project build-out is estimated at three years.Housing units will be constructed,
beginning in 1995, with completion of the project scheduled for 1997. Units will consist of detached
single-family homes,and the applicant estimates the average sales price to be$125,000,including the lot.
METHODOLOGY
Fiscal impact analysis is a projection of the direct, current, public costs and revenues associated
with residential and non residential growth in the jurisdiction in which the growth is taking place. Fiscal
impact analysis considers only direct impact in that it projects only the primary costs that will be incurred
and the immediate revenues that will be generated. It calculates the financial effect of a planned
development or new subdivision by considering the current costs and revenues such a development would
generate if it were completed and occupied today.Fiscal impact analysis does not consider the private costs
of public action. It is concerned only with public (governmental) costs and revenues.
The method used in preparing the fiscal impact analysis is the Service Standard Approach. While
only gross expenditures by service category are derived from the Per Capita Method,the Service Standard
method determines the total number of additional employees by service function that will be required as
a result of growth. This method employs average county government costs per person, average school
costs per pupil, an employee to population ratio, and average operating expenses per employee for each
service category and school district. The number of new employees are projected and multiplied times the
average operating expenses(includes personnel,operating and capital costs)per employee. These average
costs are then weighed against per capita and per pupil revenues to project the total net fiscal impact of
the development.
1L
t
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH
PROJECT FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Section 1 - Project Data
Project Name, Township, School District
Beginning Year, Ending Year, Inflation
Characteristics of Households
Construction Schedule/Cost Data
Section 2 - Local Government and School District Data
Budget Year
Per Capita Revenues
Per Capita Expenditures
Per Student Expenditures
School District Per Employee Expenditures
Employees Per 1000 Population
County Per Employee Expenditure
Other Data
Other Model Constants
School District Data
Section 3 - Demographic Projections Based On Project Data
Total Housing
Total Population
School Children
Additional County Employees
Total
School District Additional Employees
Section 4 -Projected Net Fiscal Impact on County
Tax Base
Revenues
Expenditures
Net Fiscal Impact
Section b - Projected Net Fiscal Impact on School District
Revenues
Expenditures
Net Fiscal Impact
Section 6 - Summary of Projected Impacts
Additional Housing
Additional Population
Additional School Children
Tax Base
County Government Balance
School District Balance
Total Net Fiscal Impact
EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND DATA SOURCES
RESIDENTIAL FISCAL IMPACT TEMPLATE: SERVICE STANDARD METHOD
Bureau of Economic& Business Research — University of Florida 13
Modified 11/5/93 — Orange County,NC Planning Department
SECTION 1 — PROJECT DATA: ENTER THE FOLLOWING DATA FOR EACH PROJECT:
PROJECT.-:
;:>: :;. ::;::::::.:.:. :: Ifidc H�:
TOWNSHIP: Eno
CONSTRUCTION PERIOD:
Be ::Years:
Ending Year:
Inflation:Rater:. <:>::<:.:;::;
2.9090
CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSEHOLDS:
ns
Children/House:
0.44
°Y
'Non
1(10
HOME SALES DATA:
Average Distribution
Number of Sales Price of Units
Year Homes S by Year
::1995,::.:_
1996 6 125000 3750%
5;;
1998 0 0 0.000/0
2000 0 0 0.00%
.:.:. .:.::....::.:.::.::.:..:.:::::. ... ....... . ......................
2002 0...... ......
::::.:..:..::::::::....:.. .:..::::::.:::.::.:.;;;;:;:::: (.(104?.
0 0.00%
;:: `: `':>:
2004 0 0 0.00%
SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: ENTER 01"IN( )BESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT IN WHICH PROJECT IS TO BE
LOCATED TO GENERATE STUDENT DISTRIBUTION BY SCHOOL TYPE.
School District: School Attendance:
orange CQ >::
Middle School 23%
Chapel
SCHOOL AGE CHELDREN/HOUSEHOLD: ENTER NUMBER OF UNITS BY HOUSING TYPE TO
GENERATE NUMBER OF SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN.
Children School Age
Housing a Units Per House Children
S' amff
Du p.lex:(M le 0 0 0
. ... P..x/Quadplex
;. ;::<:: «: :>
0
Town House 0 0 0
Totals_`: ;. :: ;.. .: ,_ :.: .: .:; :. .. ;: 7777
—SECTION 2 — LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA 14
1993-94
COUNTY POPULATION: 100758
SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT'POPULATION:.. 5444
COUNTY EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER CAPITA
108.6E1. 0.0011
Public Safety 134.00 0.0013
x00 0.0005
.. .........
Human Services 24629 0.0024
EducatlDA SCI!District ,...., . 726.00. 0.0072
SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER STUDENT
. ....... .::.:.....:. ...... .....
726.00 0.1334
COUNTY PER CAPITA REVENUES S : REVENUES PER CAPITA
Tapes;- .;Other:I an.Pro ...........:::< ::. 4127000.... 40.96
..:...:.: :.
Intergovernmental 8778421 87.12
......... ..:. .
Sertirlce:;Char " ..... : : 2969123 29.47
:::: .:....:.......:. .::...:...:....:.:..:::::....::... :: ..:.:
Miscellaneous 787197 7.81
COUNTY PER CAPITA EXPENDITURES S : EXPENDITURES PER CAPITA
Gencr4i Gov rnmeut. : .::.::::....: :.:. . :.;:::::::; : ::62. 1551::.. 62.05
Public Safety 5854402 58.10
.... ..
...... ...: :,. ..::. 7.40
...::: 2
;::.Faber. ?ftor�. ...............::.:,:.....: . ..................... ..... ?f�Q727.
Human Services 15528989 154.12
;. ,.,..
Education.. Recunm :Ca..aal > :.:::>::. >:::: « .750000: 7.44
Non—Departmental 2343967 2126
COUNTY PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURE $ : EXPENDTTURES PER EMPLOYEE
Gehl Gy b2SI551 : 5756493
.... . .:... .
Public Safety. 5854402 4368957
»;:.:::::<;::::::::::::.:::<.>::<:;:,,:......:;>:::::<:..;:::.:>;::::: 60'127 ' 5521454
Human Services 15528989 63051.64
duC�ttibn: ecurratt ......
750000" 1033.06
SCHOOL DISTRICT PER STUDENT EXPENDITURES S : EXPENDMJRES PER STUDENT
county Gawern�
........................... ..
`:,:: 742f11T2 :. 1363.00
School District 0 0.00
:::.:,....,....::,..:... .........
... 17584881 : 3230.14
SCHOOL DISTRICT PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURES S : EXPENDITURES PER EMPLOYEE
aunty Garrsmaent 742QI?2: 1022062
School District 0 0.00
.: .::.:.:.::..... ...::..:...... ............
....::...:...
State :: ::... . ' ;.`; 17584881 24221.60
TAX DATA: ENTER APPLICABLE ASSESSMENT RATIO AND ELDERLY EXEMP'T'ION:
Ctnty' ax:Rate ) PeF$I messed Valuation.
School District Tax Rate ($) 0.0000 Per$100 Assessed Valuation
.......
Elderly Exemption 0 $11,000 Where Applicable
SECTION 3 - DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA 15
YEAR ;:.:1995 1996 199'l
1998 `:: ::.:::;:.:1999
HOUSING UNITS
16
16
POPULATION 13: 28
41 41.
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary l: 2 3
Middle
2: 2 2.
High School
TOTAL 2` S ? 7"' ';:!`' 7
COUNTY
GOVERNMENT
AD
D1T
IONAL
EMPLOYEES
Ge e
n ral
Go v
ernment QiO: 0.0
Public Safety tk.0
Public Works
QA. . '<
0 l.0:;
0.0
0
Human Services
0.1
TOTAL
SCHOOL L
DISTRICT CT
ADDITIONAL
EMPLOYEES
YEAR 2001 ::: ! ::.:.:: ;;::,.: 00Z. 2003 <;.,_:;:::>:::. ,2044
HOUSING SING
UNITS
::::Ifs:
POPULATION
ULATI
ON
SCHOOL HOOL
CHILDREN
REN
Elementary
to
ry
Middle
. .::.:...:::.::.: . .
High School
TOTAL AL
C
O
U
NTY GO
VE
RNME
NT
ADD
ITIO
NAL
EMPLOYEES
YBBS
General ral Go v e
rnme
nt
12 .
:.0.12
Public
Safety
Public Works
ks
0.0
Human Services
f f::
0.
1
TOTAL AL
SCHOOL HO
O
L DI
S
TRI
CT
ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES
JLSEeTION 4 - PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON COUNTY GOVERNMENT 16
YEAR 1995. 1996 : ..: 1997 1998 1999
TAX BASE($1000) 625: 1393 "2059. 2118 2180
REVENUES ($)
Property Tax 4663. 10393 ]5357. 15802 16260
Other Taxes 526: 1192 :::'> 1783 1835 1888
Intergovernmental 1120 2534 .; :.3793 3903 4017
Service Charges -.:379 857 _ : .:.::`: :;I283 1320 1359
Miscellaneous 100. 227 :. : '` :._> . 3aE? 350 360
TOTAL (S) `` .6787: 15203 "` :':`:22556 23211 23884
EXPENDITURES ($)
General Government 79?: 1805 ::.2701 2780 2860
Public Safety 747 1690 .2530 2603 26 79
Public Works 352: 797 °1193; 1228 1263
Human Services 1980: 4483 ? :<'i710 6905 7105
Education :`:'.3194' 7005 : 115M 10788 11101
Non-Departmental 299' 677 1013 1042 1072
TOTAL ($) 7270: 16457 `24632 25346 26081
NET FISCAL IMPACT S —482 —1254 >: --2075: —2135 —2197
YEAR 2tI00 2001 2003 2004
TAX BASE($1000) 2243: 2308 ; ::;'``2375` 2444 2515
REVENUES
5 ..
Property Tax 17716:.. 18230 18759
Other Taxes -<14943: 1999 ; ;::` .;;'> 205.7:: 2117 2178
Intergovernmental °-4133 4253 4376::: 4503 4634
Service Charges '':; 98:. 1438 :> .;:: ?:;>.?`;:1480; 1523 1567
.::.:::.... .
..:..:::::..
8
Miscellaneous 371. 381 :: `:: 392::: 404 416
.....
TOTAL ($) ';: >: ;':24576. 25289 ... :;:1:26022-: 26777 27554
EXPENDITURES S
( )
General Government 2143:: 3029 ...:<:` ;: ..3117:: 3207 _ 3300
Public Safety : :2756' 2836 2919; 3003 3090
Public Works >":'LQO: 1337 :. :< ;;:<;;:;;1375 1416 1457
Human Services X331:: 7523 7966 8197
Education : 114 11754 12495': 12446 12807
Non—Departmental . 1104 1136 ;:: ;::: :_:< I169' 1202 1237
TOTAL ($) 2M7:. 27616 _.` ': .;::? '.28417;: 29241 30089
NET FISCAL IMPACT S 2261 —2327 -2394 —2463 —2535
SECTION 5 — PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT 17
YEAR ; 1995 1996 ::1997 1998 .1999
REVENUES($)
County 7005 aQ484 10788 .>' . :':.. .:. ..: 11101
School District 0 0
0
State 16087 ':. c>:`:; Z4Q78: 24777
25495
TOTAL (S) 23092
-.. .
34562 35565 36596
EXPENDITURES
S
County 3094". 7005
2Q484:: 10788 "-:11101
School District .
0 p
0
state 7106:: 16087 X4078 24777
25495
TOTAL S
'IU
23
092 <:::?::" .:::::'34562" 35565
3b
NET FISCAL
IMPACT
S
Q
YEAR 2001
,..... ?.004
REVENUES NUES
S
Conn
112 : 1
<`
County
11754 <.:12()95:' 12446
School District
State
26
277n
TOTAL
S
387
EXPENDITURES
I
TUBES
S
county
1143
tY .. .. `.:' ; >I1095. 12446 12807:
School District
:..:....:::...:..:
.... .... ........ :. ...
State 26995 <> 2�'P778:; 28584
-: - 2413
TOTAL AL
S
387
;. 39873::: 41030 ,::: `':<:': .'':.:`42219
NET FISCAL CAL
IMPACT
S
—S'ECT'ION 6 — SUMMARY OF PROJECTED DEMOGRAPHIC/FISCALIMPACTS 18
YEAR
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
HOUSING UNITS S 11 -16. 16 16
POPULATION 13: 28 41. 41 41
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 1 2 3. 3 3
..:::....:....
Middle 1 1 ;...... 2. 2 2
High School 2 2
TOTAL <: 2 5 .::::.::> : :: 7 7 ?
COUNTY EMPLOYEES ( 1 0.2 : %>0:2 0.2 0.2
scxoOL EMPLOYEES °EIrS 0.2 0:3 0.3 0.3
TAX BASE(ti000) 62 1393 ':::. .:;`: .2059.. 2118 2180
COUNTY BUDGET(5)
Revenues 6 - 15203 `225S6 23211 23884
Expenditures 7270>: 16457 < :24632. 25346 26081
BALANCE -�4$Z, —1254 . ...: : < -2M —2135 —2197
SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET($):.:' ......_ :':
Revenues ":;:;;1(#201:' 23092 34,562: 35565 36546
Expenditures
.-:402Qi; 23092 34562.: 35565 36596
BALANCE `,'W 0 :;:' `>::':`:';4: 0 0
COMBINED BUDGETS(i)
Revenues 16988< 38295 571:19: 58775 60480
Expenditures 4?E ; 39549 59194 60911 ... 62677
BALANCE :-482: —1254 ' 20T5 —2135 —2197
YEAR 2000 2001 2002:: 2003 2004
HOUSING UNITS ;.1f 16 '. : ":: :I6' 16 16
POPULATION ;41: 41 `:41> 41 41
SCHOOL CHILDREN
Elementary 3
.::...:..:.::.::::... .::.
Middle 2
2
2
'` Z:
-::
High School ><":<`::::<«>2 2 :< :2:: 2 :: . . 2
..
TOTAL ;;:;.<::::::::;::>.i'r':•:.;:i7 7 '; :::..::> .. ::` '. 7 7
............
COUNTY EMPLOYEES :::'><::::>:.>` ><:::::;: 0:2:' 0.2 ::<.:.::;> ;0:2: 0.2 : .. - 0.2
SCHOOL EMPLOYEES :3< 0.3 0.3' 0.3 0.3
TAX BASE($i000) :. `.2243<: 2308 :2375 2444 2515
COUNTY BUDGET(S)
Revenues 24S?6:< 25289 .:;` ::.::26dL2 26777 27554
Expenditures 26$3?' 27616 :' .28417:: 29241 : 30039
BALANCE —2327 .;..: `'< -2394' —2463 —2535
SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET
Revenues 3'f65T> 38750 39873 41030 42219
Expenditures 37651: 38750
39$73 41030 4221
BALANCE ( 0 0:. 0 0
COMBINED BUDGETS(i)
Revenues 6.:.62234: 64039 65M. 67807 69773 '
Expenditures
;. ::. ::,,;.:..64495 66365 ::.:.:::.°:.68290. 70270 ... . 30
BALANCE 2261 —2327 —2394 —2463 —2535
19
EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND DATA SOURCES
SECTION 1 - PROJECT DATA
Project data includes information about the specific development project. Much, if not all, of the
information is supplied by the applicant. Data inputs include:
Project Name: Name of the project.
Township: Township in which the project is located.
School District: School district in which the project is located.
Beginning Year: The first year of the project in which dwelling units are completed and
occupied.
Ending Year: The last year in which dwelling units are completed and occupied. The template is set to
calculate fiscal impacts for a ten-year period.
Inflation Rate: Unless an inflation rate is entered, the template will calculate fiscal impacts based on
constant dollars. Since the inflation rate changes frequently, the Finance Department must be contacted
for the most recent figure.
Persons/Household:The estimated average number of persons/household(dwelling unit) based on 1990
Census data for the township in which the project is located.This information is supplied by the Planning
Department and will be updated as necessary using population projections and building permit data
Children/Household. The estimated average number of school age children/household (dwelling unit)
based on 1990 Census data for the township in which the project is located. This information is supplied
by the Planning Department and will be updated as necessary using school membership data.
%Non-Elderly:N.C.General Statutes permit an$11,000 exemption to the elderly and disabled who meet
certain income criteria In the event that elderly units are part of the project, the percentage of eligible
non-elderly units is entered. The tax base will automatically be adjusted to reflect the exemption.
Number of Homes: The number of dwelling units to be constructed in the project in each year.
Average Sales Price:The average sales price of all dwelling units based on the number and sales price
of dwelling unit types to be constructed in each year.
20
SECTION 2 - LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA
Local government data includes information regarding expenditures required to provide County
services and revenues received based on the approved Orange County budget for the fiscal year in which
the project is considered for approval.All information derived from the approved budget remains constant
throughout a fiscal year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of a new budget.
Local government revenue and expenditure information is compiled on a per capita (per person)
basis.Per capita figures are derived by dividing the total expenditures for a particular service function or
revenue source by the estimated population of Orange County for the year in which the project is
considered for approval. Populations estimates are prepared by the Planning Department.
Data inputs include the following.
Budget Year: The current fiscal year; i.e., 1993-94.
Per Capita Revenues: The sources of revenue by major category are as follows:
Taxes-Other Than Property:Revenues from taxes other than property taxes include those from sales
and use taxes, franchise taxes, and animal taxes.
Intergovernmental Aid: Revenues from this source, in the form of categorical aid or shared-tax
revenues, are provided through State and federal assistance programs.
Service Charges: Service (or user) charges support numerous functions and are charged to those who
voluntarily receive governmental services or use governmental facilities.
Miscellaneous:Miscellaneous revenues include interest earnings on investments, proceeds from license
and permit fees, and all other revenues.
Per Capita Expenditures: Expenditures by major category are as follows:
General Government: Services related to the legislative, administrative, financial, and legal functions
of government.
Public Safety: Law enforcement services and emergency medical services.
Public Works: Efforts related to the maintenance of County-owned property and the provision of
sanitation (solid waste disposal) services.
Human Services Departments responsible for the provision of health, social, and recreation-related
services.
Education:Orange County supports two school units,the Orange County school system and the Chapel
Hill\Carrboro school system. This category includes appropriations made to the designated school system
for Recurring Capital items. Recurring Capital funds are used for general maintenance,purchase of new
equipmentif wWshings and vehicle maintenance.
Non-Departmental: Contributions to agencies providing cultural and social services outside the formal
structure of county government. Other expenditures include equipment replacement and contingency
funds. Although there are no employees generated by this category, it has been included as an operating
expenditure. It will be included in Section 4,"Total Annual County Expenditure." These expenditures will
be calculated on a per capita basis as opposed to a per employee basis.
21
Per Student Expenditures:Information regarding expenditures required to provide educational services
and revenues received are based on the approved school system budgets for the fiscal year in which the
project is considered for approval. All information derived from the approved budgets remains constant
throughout a fiscal year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of new budgets.
Expenditure information is compiled on a per student basis for County Government Current Expense,
School District and State appropriations. County Government Current Expense funds are used for general
operation purposes including Instruction and Support Services. Federal revenues and expenditures and
other local revenues such as Fund Balance have not been included since they are not directly growth
related. Per student figures are derived by dividing the total appropriation for educational purposes from
a particular source by the estimated number of students to be enrolled in the applicable school system for
the year in which the project is considered for approval. Student enrollments are obtained from the
approved school system budgets.
County Government: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations to the school systems
by Orange County for Current Expense. The minimum level of per student appropriation is determined
by the State Board of Education.
School District:Expenditures in this category are unique to the Chapel Hill-Carrboro school system and
are based on the level of expenditures possible through assessment of a supplementary school tax.
State: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations from the State Board of Education.
School District Per Employee Expenditure: Expenditures per employee based on County, School
District and State appropriations, and the total number of school district employees.
Employees Per 1000 Population:The number of employees in a particular service category per 1000
population.
County Per Employee Expenditure: The average operating and capital expenses per employee in a
particular service category. Total expenses in each category includes personnel,operating and capital costs.
Other Data:
County Government Tax Rate: The County tax rate per $100 of assessed valuation. Since the per
capita method focuses only on operating expenditures,the tax rate is reduced by an amount equal to the
debt service payments from property taxes for capital projects.
School District Tax Rate:The supplementary tax assessed on behalf of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro school
system.
Assessment Ratio:The ratio of market(sales)value to assessed value based on information supplied by
the Tax Office. The assessment ratio is used to convert market value to assessed value for the purpose
of computing the tax base.
Other Model Constants
Elderly Exemption:For projects developed partially or exclusively for elderly(65 and older) or disabled
individuals whose annual income does not exceed$12,000, an$11,000 tax exemption is used in projecting
the tax base.
School District Employees Per Student:The number of employees per student in a specific school
district.
22
SECTION 3 - DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA
Demographic projections provide information about the number of new residents and school children
anticipated in Orange County resulting from project development.Projections also provide the number of
additional employees required per service function and school district as a result of the new development.
Total Housing Unite The cumulative total of new housing units added each year by project
development.
Total Population:The total population added each year by a project derived by multiplying the number
of homes to be constructed by the number of persons per household (see Section 1).
School Population: The total number of school children added each year by a project derived by
multiplying the number of homes constructed by the number of children per household (see Section 1).
Additional County Employees: The number of additional employees required per service category
based on project development.
Total Total of all additional county employees required based on project development.
School District Additional Employees: The number of additional employees required per school
district based on the project development.
SECTION 4 -PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON COUNTY
Tax Base:The tax base represents the increase in assessed property value expected each year resulting
from project development.The values shown are in$1,000's and are derived from a formula which includes
the number and sales price of homes, and the assessment ratio. Where applicable, the percentage of
non elderly units and elderly exemption are also used.
Revenues All revenues are derived from a formula which multiplies the per capita revenues (Section 2)
times the projected population (Section 3).The exception to this is the property tax which multiplies the
tax base times the county government tax rate.
Expenditures: All expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies the per employee
expenditure (Section 2) times the number of additional employees (Section 3).
Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures and
projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs Orange County more to provide services
to a project than it receives in revenues.A positive net balance indicates that more revenues are received
than it costs to serve a project. Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset negative
balances in another.
23
SECTION 6 - PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Revenues: The County contribution is derived by transferring education expenditures by County
government(Section 4).Revenues derived from the school district tax are derived by multiplying the school
district tax times the tax base. State revenues are derived by multiplying the per student expenditure
figure times the total projected number of school children (Section 3).
Expenditures: Expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies each per student
expenditure (Section 2) times the total projected number of school children (Section 3) and adding the
results.
Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures and
projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs the school system more to provide
educational services for children in a project than it receives in revenues.A positive net balance indicates
that more revenues are received than it costs to serve a project.Positive net balances in one project may
thus be used to offset negative balances in another.
SECTION 6 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED EWPACTS
24
DRAFT MAY 16,1994 PLANNING BOARD MEETING
Willis indicated Collins provided that
information and Brown asked that Collins explain
that at the next Planning Board meeting.
MOTION: Jobsis moved approval as recommended by the
Planning Staff. Seconded by Walters.
VOTE: Unanimous.
(3) Hickory Hill
( 16 Lots Eno Township)
Presentation by Eddie Kirk.
The property is located in Eno Township on the
northeast side of Palmer's Grove Church Road
(SR 1582) . It is zoned Agricultural Residential
and L-Eno-PW. It is designated Agricultural
Residential and Lower Eno Watershed in the Land
Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan for Orange
County.
Land uses in the area include Spirit Hill
Subdivision and other single family lots. The
subdivision will be served by individual wells
and septic tanks.
The total acreage of the tract is 20.34 acres.
Sixteen ( 16) lots are proposed that average 1 . 15
acres in size. The lots all front on Mary E.
Cook Drive which is proposed to be public and
constructed to State standards. Mary E. Cook
Drive follows an existing private right-of-way
and extends north off of Palmer's Grove Church
Road which is a paved secondary State road.
The Planning Board approved the Concept Plan at
its January 24, 1994 meeting with the condition
that all lots must receive access from Mary E.
Cook Drive. .
Agency comments were received from the County
Attorney, Emergency Management, Recreation and
Parks, Soil and Water Conservation, Erosion
Control and NCDOT. Applicable comments have been
incorporated into the Resolution of Approval (an
an attachment to these minutes on pages ) .
There was a concern from the County Attorney
about the small portion of the road being in lot
3 of Spirit Hill Subdivision. The concern was
about the dedication and how it would take place.
There were two options: 1) that ownership could
be transferred to the owner of Spirit Hill
Subdivision; or 2) the owner of lot 3 could sign
25
off on the final plat dedicating the right-of-
way. Wesley Cook, applicant stated that the
option to have the owner of lot 3 sign off on the
final plat is the option that will be taken.
Willis noted that the area of concern could be
re-combined so that it becomes part of the right-
of-way or, if the owners were willing to do so.
The ownership of the land does not matter as long
as it is dedicated public.
The Planning Staff recommends approval subject to
the conditions contained in the Resolution of
Approval.
MOTION: Barrows moved approval as recommended by the
Planning Staff excluding condition V. Seconded
by Hoecke.
VOTE: Unanimous.
AGENDA ITEM #9: MATTERS SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC HEARING (5/23/94)
a. Subdivision Regulations Amendments
( 1) Section IV-B-3-d-1 Roads
Private Road Justification Criteria
(2) Section II - Definitions
Section III-C-4 Minor Subdivisions -
Action Subsequent to Approval
Presentation by Mary Willis.
(These are presented as informational items prior
to the public hearing. Complete agenda abstracts
and attachments are on file in the Planning
Department. )