Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 06-06-1994 - VIII-D r 1 OR AN G E C O U N T Y BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: June 6. 1994 Action Agenda Item , VnZ-D SUBJECT: MILL POINTE - PRELIMINARY PLAN ACTION BY: July 21, 1994 DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes _x No ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: Eddie Kirk Extension 2582 Resolution of Approval Application TELEPHONE NUMBERS: vicinity Map Hillsborough - 732-8181 Fiscal Impact Analysis Durham - 688-7331 Preliminary Plan Mebane - 227-2031 5/16/94 Draft Planning Board Chapel Hill - 967-9251 Minutes PURPOSE: Consideration of the Preliminary Plan for Mill Pointe. BACKGROUND: The property is located in Cedar Grove Township on the west side of Mill Creek Road (SR 1343) . Mill Creek Road is a paved State-maintained road and considered a collector in the Comprehensive Plan. A 1991 traffic count on this road indicated 900 trips per day. The total acreage of the tract is 12 . 08 acres. Ten (10) lots are proposed which average 45,393 square feet in size. New lots will be served by individual wells and septic tanks. The property is located in the Back Creek Watershed. It is designated as Agricultural Residential (AR) and Back Creek Watershed in the Comprehensive Plan. A public road is proposed to serve eight (8) of the ten (10) lots in the subdivision. The short cul-de-sac would extend west off Mill Creek Road. The Planning Board reviewed and approved the Concept Plan for Mill Pointe at its September 20, 1993 meeting with the following conditions: 1. Access for lots 1 and 2 is limited to a joint driveway. 2. Access for lots 3 through 10 is limited to Mill Pointe Lane. a The Planning Board considered the Preliminary Plan for } Mill Pointe on May 16, 1994 and unanimously recommended approval subject to the conditions contained in the Resolution of Approval. RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan for Mill Pointe subject to the conditions contained in the attached Resolution of Approval. RESOLUTION s OF THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Date Tune 6. 1994 Name of Subdivision Mill Pointe Owner/Applicant C.M. Ray, Jr. The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves Mill Pointe subdivision preliminary plat, dated March 21, 1994 and containing 10 lots in Orange County, subject to the fulfillment of requirements specified herein. Mill Pointe Lane shall be irrevocably dedicated to the general public and be constructed to standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. The approval of this resolution authorizes and directs the Orange County Manager to accept for Orange County and on behalf of the public generally, the offer of dedication of Mill Pointe Lane. This acceptance by Orange County of the dedication to the general public of Mill Pointe Lane shall be without maintenance responsibility. This road shall be maintained.by the owner/applicant until such time as it is accepted for maintenance by the North Carolina Department of Transportation or some other governmental body. Before the Final Plat of Mill Pointe can be recorded: A. Sewage Disposal 1. Each residential lot shall contain an adequate area for septic disposal, and repair area, approved by the Orange County Division of Environmental Health. 2. The septic system location may restrict the size and location of improvements. This disclosure shall be included in a document describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. The document shall also disclose that information regarding the tentative location of septic systems is available from the Orange County Health Department, Division of Environmental Health. 1 4 B. Roads and Access 1. Mill Pointe Lane shall be constructed to standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation, within a 50 foot right-of-way, and the construction shall be inspected and approved by NCDOT. OR A letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond shall be submitted to secure construction of Mill Pointe Lane to the standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. An estimate of the construction cost must be prepared by a certified/licensed engineer or grading contractor and submitted to the Planning and Inspections Department. The financial guarantee must reflect 110% of that estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina. The document describing development restrictions to be recorded with the Final Plat shall state that the financial guarantee will not be released until the road construction has been inspected and approved by NCDOT. 2. Submit an erosion control plan for construction of the road. 3. Lots 3-10 shall access onto the new subdivision road. This restriction shall be stated in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 4. The joint driveway serving lots 1 and 2 shall be constructed from Mill Creek Road prior to Final Plat approval. 5. The intersection of Mill Pointe Lane with Mill Creek Road must meet NCDOT standards. C. Land Use Buffers and Landscaping 1. Landscaping shall be installed or preserved as indicated on the approved landscape plan, and must be inspected and approved by the Planning and Inspections Department. OR Guaranteed financially through a letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond submitted to secure required landscape installation and preservation. An estimate of the cost for required preservation, plantings and their installation must be provided. The financial guarantee shall reflect 110 percent of the estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina. 2 2. Provisions for protection of existing trees as shown on the approved landscape 5 plan shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 3. A Type A Land Use Buffer shall be provided along the right-of-way for Mill Creek Road (SR 1343). The buffer shall be 30 feet in width and provide sufficient vegetation to meet the standards of Section IV-B-8-e of the Subdivision Regulations. Said buffer shall be so noted on the plat, and described in a document describing development restrictions and requirement to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. D. Parkland 1. Cash in the amount of $342.00 [($1,200/acre x 10/35 acre)] shall be paid to Orange County as payment in lieu of parkland dedication. E. , Drainage 1. Impervious surface data, as pursuant to Article 6.23.3 of the Zoning Ordinance shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. F. Miscellaneous 1. The Final Plat shall contain a title block and vicinity map in accordance with Section V-D-2 and V-D-3 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. G. Certifications 1. A Certificate of Survey and Accuracy signed by a registered Land Surveyor shall be notarized on the face of the Final Plat. 2. A Certificate of Declaration and Maintenance in the form provided in Section V-D-6-b of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations signed by the landowner and developer shall be on the face of the plat and included in a document describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 3. The Department of Environmental Health shall certify that all residential lots contain sufficient area for septic tank disposal and repair. 3 6 4. The North Carolina Department of Transportation shall certify that Mill Pointe Lane has been constructed to State standards or that construction plans have been approved. 5. A Certificate of Approval signed by the Orange County Planning and Inspections Department. Signature of Applicant Clerk to the Board I, , accept the above listed conditions of subdivision approval, and acknowledge that each must be met prior to recordation of the Final Plat. 4 APfJL4UA f 1UN FOR PRELIMINARY PLAN APPROVAL MAJOR SUBDIVISION 8/93 7 ORANGE COUNTY DATE: 3/21/94 PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT (INK ONLY) SUBDIVISION NAME: Mill Pointe - LOCATION: Mill Creek Road (SR 1343) OWNER/DEVELOPER: C.M. Ray, Jr. ADDRESS: 272 Sun-Ray Lane TELEPHONE NO.: 563-1260 -Mebane, NU 27302 AGENT/CONTACT: rani pl L_ Paz.-,nn TELEPHONE NO.: 563-3113 121 W_ Clay Street, Mebane A. SUMMARY INFORMATION: Orange County Tax Map 43 Block - Lot(s) 11 Township 2 ( Cedar Grove Zoning District(s): Orange Co. AR, Back-PW Total Number of Acres: 12 1 , Includes R/W Phases: 1 Total Number of Lots: , 0 Average Lot Size:499()_ Minimum Lot Size: /,(1 X000 Number/Type of Structures: (existing)_p (proposed) 1 Lineal Feat in Streets: 1;Qi1 Acres in Open Space: 10 Water Supply: Public (specify) Community 418,]1 Individual Wastewater Disposal: Public (specify) Community 4p=ti r- Individual School District: —or-Ras Fire*District: Cpr(ar Crnvp General Land Uses in Area: Rec;rlcnt-yg], / A8r'7,C111_t;t1r 01 Critical Areas: stream/drainageways flood prone areas Bark Creek _ watershed (specify) historic sites.. other (explain) Is the property to be subdivided currently under"farm use value taxation'? YesX No_. If "yes". please contact the Orange County Tax Office. Subdivision of the property may require payment of deferred taxes under "farm use value taxation'. B. All plats must be submitted on sheet no smaller than one inch equals two-hundred feet 0" 2001 and no larger than one inch equals twenty feet (1"-201 and must contain the following'information: subdivision name Y ' ,v, zoning of tract and adjacent. zT name & address of owner(s) properties name &address of subdivider X building setback lines by notation (if other than owner) or typical lot layout �. X name of surveyor, engineer, X � location and width of existing and c landscape architect or architect. proposed easements (drainage, ° address, registration # and seal utilities. roads, etc.) ° t � X (title) Preliminary Plan X existing, proposed and adjoining scale, north arrow rights-of-way including dimensions aV �_ '?`:r date (including revision dates) and street names and state road E •� X township, tax map-block lot numbers. Lineal feet of road references centerlines and approximate ° X `<` Parent Parcel Identification # acreage of new street rights-of- X <:54 ••'•. deed book and page #t of property way w° to be subdivided ` X, . existing and proposed-utilities, ' a� ;,r:. r4 cc X M boundary described yvith bearings including type, sizes, hydrants, E and distances valves, manholes .,, o � X ">:. total acreage of the tract.and X '`.''�'.••.•�� existing and proposed curbs, acreage of lots, including and gutters and culverts, including U - excluding area within rights-of- sizes and grades °) co location and width of alloys, L t X way NrA ':'.: control corner sidewalks, bike lanes, transit systems, and bus stops (please complete reverse side) proposed lot lines with dimensions typical street cross-sections and 8 )C lot & block numbers intersection details including Y phasing lines design and width of travelway and topography at ton foot (10) shoulders intervals . . Y horizontal alignment and general cc N/A water bodies, streams, floodway curve data (public roads) and flocidplains X centerline radius on all proposed N/A stream buffers streets N/A.. location and size of parcels Permanent features such as 0 U dedicated for public use, buildings, cemeteries, historic E ­4 0 14.4 recreational use or reserved in landmarks 0 common, with purpose noted X adjoining lot layout names of X impervious surface data (if located adjoining property owners. if 4-4 in water supply watershed) subdivided, subdivision plat name, X vicinity map showing general plat book & page number, and 1-1 cc C_ Q) location of subdivision with streets perimeter lot numbers. a �4 0 M and roads identified by State road N/A location and size of lots of U _= number and name restricted development potential _,Z a) y landscaping and buffer and notation on plat regarding U 'a co requirements same N/A township, corporate and extra- N A stormwater detention and/or En territorial planning jurisdiction lines retention sites and undisturbed which cross the property areas for infiltration purposes (if located in water supply watershed) C. OTHER SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Twenty-five (25) copist of the preliminary plat. 2. One full size copy of an Orange County Tax map (with tax parcels involved clearly marked in pencil). 3. Where municipal or OWASA sewer is not available, a copy of the Preliminary Plat indicating Health Department soils analysis approval/denial for each lot shown thereon. 4. Where a privet* road is proposed a written statement by the applicant or his/her authorized representative which sets forth the justification for a private road (see Section IV-B-3-d-1 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations). 5. Auxiliary documents, in draft form, prepared in accordance with Section-VL of.this Ordinance which assure completion and/or maintenance of improvements required by this Ordinance. Such documents may include, but not be limited to, a private road maintenance agreement, and articles of incorporation and restrictive covenants pertaining to a homeowner's association. These documents may be required as necessary as evidence that the ordinance requirements are being met. a. Fee - $350.00 plus $5.00 per lot 0 fee for preliminary and final plat). 7. If the subdivision contains 10 lots or more the following information shall be submitted with the application: a. Number of years to buildout. b. Number of houses to be built during each year to buildout. c. Avfrago price of houses including lots for each year to buildout. 1, the applicant, hereby certify that the foregoing application is complete and accurate. -7 APPLICANT'S SIGNATU OWNER'S SIGNATURE DA DATE # FEES: Amount Date Paid 2 q Receipt 07 / 21 IDaxzial L _ paXS01^1 ac Associates DATE: 21 March 1994 Orange County Planning Department 306F Revere Road Hillsborough, NC 27278 Attn: Mr. Eddie Kirk PROJECT NAME/LOCATION: Mill Pointe / Mill Creek Road (SR 1343) Dear Mr. Kirk: As requested, here is a possible schedule of projected buildout for the Mill Pointe Project. The developer will be marketing lots only and will not be building the houses. With this in mind, I submit the following projections: Years to buildout: 4 Number of houses to be built during each year: year 1 - 3 year 2 - 3 year 3 - 3 year 4 - 1 Average price of houses including lots for each year: $85,000. I hope this information will be of some use to you, but we really have no way of knowing how quickly the lots will sell. !incerel�} J4 Daniel L. Paxson, PE 121 West Clay Street - Suite H Mebane , North Carolina 27302 ( 919 ) 363-3113 ---------- ------------------------- engineering Sc plar�ning v \ 2854 CHARLIE'S SEE I DEAD EN D 10 %P 42-7 2 1347 V �_�• = � � 2A -,_ y Zg '5243 I 0 2 AC- . slss 166 352 AC. 6147 \ — — _�/ 0137 1.65� AG '07 8°01 .2836 • 8833 2AC•, 2 19.61 AC• 13A a. 10.02 AC- 23 // .2 GCAL \ 15C a* a 4 j �.N, \ 12 3476 m ,'�F �� 8379 '3B = \ 2403 5 88 158 �JQ� // ter 2AC. -- 5 56 AC. 'a A 9248 3.36 . ��\ ` _ 3.1 SAC 4. 16 AC AC- _ _PRN_R/W PfiR)AS R K 'S 0 NIML POINTS 16 9624 Applicant: C.M. Ray LUP: Agricultural Residential 29.286 AC // Water Supply Watershed .7291 to 133. 68 AC. 21.006 AC• 10.257 AC- I // 1369 CEDAR ,_____ �_- // CHEEKS _ 48 W _ W PLAT REFERENCES TAX P'._:RPOSES ONLY 1 �o�N HOLSIUGER ►17— 118� GRA�Y Aoa�ns 11 FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR MILL POINTE SUBDIVISION RESIDENTIAL SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH Prepared by The Orange County Planning Department May, 1884 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Mill Pointe is a proposed 10-lot major subdivision located in Cedar Grove Township on the west side of Mill Creek Road. The average lot size is approximately 1.04 acres. All lots will be served by individual wells and septic tanks, and public roads. For Mill Pointe, project build-out is estimated at four years. Housing units will be constructed, beginning in 1995, with completion of the project scheduled for 1998. Units will consist of detached single-family homes, and the applicant estimates the average sales price to be$85,000, including the lot. METHODOLOGY Fiscal impact analysis is a projection of the direct, current, public costs and revenues associated with residential and non residential growth in the jurisdiction in which the growth is taking place. Fiscal impact analysis considers only direct impact in that it projects only the primary costs that will be incurred and the immediate revenues that will be generated. It calculates the financial effect of a planned development or new subdivision by considering the current costs and revenues such a development would generate if it were completed and occupied today.Fiscal impact analysis does not consider the private costs of public action. It is concerned only with public (governmental) costs and revenues. The method used in preparing the fiscal impact analysis is the Service Standard Approach. While only gross expenditures by service category are derived from the Per Capita Method,the Service Standard method determines the total number of additional employees by service function that will be required as a result of growth. This method employs average county government costs per person, average school costs per pupil, an employee to population ratio, and average operating expenses per employee for each service category and school district. The number of new employees are projected and multiplied times the average operating expenses(includes personnel,operating and capital costs)per employee. These average costs are then weighed against per capita and per pupil revenues to project the total net fiscal impact of the development. 12 TABLE OF CONTENTS SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH PROJECT FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Section 1 - Project Data Project Name, Township, School District Beginning Year, Ending Year, Inflation Characteristics of Households Construction Schedule/Cost Data Section 2 - Local Government and School District Data Budget Year Per Capita Revenues Per Capita Expenditures Per Student Expenditures School District Per Employee Expenditures Employees Per 1000 Population County Per Employee Expenditure Other Data Other Model Constants School District Data Section 3 - Demographic Projections Based On Project Data Total Housing Total Population School Children Additional County Employees Total School District Additional Employees Section 4 - Projected Net Fiscal Impact on County Tax Base Revenues Expenditures Net Fiscal Impact Section 6 - Projected Net Fiscal Impact on School District Revenues Expenditures Net Fiscal Impact Section 6 - Summary of Projected Impacts Additional Housing Additional Population Additional School Children Tax Base County Government Balance School District Balance Total Net Fiscal Impact EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND DATA SOURCES RESIDENTIALFISCAL IMPACT TEMPLATE: SERVICE STANDARD METHOD • Bureau of Economic& Business Research — University of Florida Modified 11/5/93 — Orange County,NC Planning Department SECTION 1 - PROJECT DATA: ENTER THE FOLLOWING DATA FOR EACH PROJECT: PR07EGTs-X : Mill PAnte'SiAdivisim- TO WNSHP: Cedar Grove CONSTRUCTION PERIOD: Ending Year: ......... 1998. 2 9(Wo Inflation CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSEHOLDS: :173 Children/House: 0.46 000% Ndn .El0erlt: HOME SALES DATA. Average Distribution Number of Sales Price of Units Year Homes S b Year ........... 7777 7-77 1996 3 85000 30.00% .......... '�o .......... ...... ........ .............. 19:.97 F. W.. . ... .... 1998 1 95000 10.00% . .... .. .. 2000 0 0 0.000/0 .... .... . . ...... ........... . ... ........ . ........ ....... ..... . . ....... ......... 2002 0 0 0.00% ............ ......... .... . ............ ... ....... 2004 0 0 0.000/, SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA. ENTER-1-IN BESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT IN WHICH PROJECT IS TO BE LOCATED TO GENERATE STUDENT DISTRIBUTION BY SCHOOL TYPE. School District: School Attendance: ......... Middle School 23% . 1 SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN/HOUSEHOLD: ENTER NUMBER OF UNITS BY HOUSING TYPE TO GENERATE NUMBER OF SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN. Children School Age Housing Type units Per House Children ....... ... Fam. Duplex/Triplex/Quadplex 0 0, Town House 0 0 0 3 ..Totalt: SECTION 2 - LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA 14 BUAOET XF;AR::; :::;':::::::> :; _. 1 -94 COUNTY POPULATION: 100758 .SC HOOL DISTRI:OT STUDENT POPULATION: 5444 COUNTY EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER CAPITA 1 0.00ii Public Safety 134.00 0.0013 Pubic t 4w.w.- X00 0.0005 Human Services 246.29 0.0024 Educatidt: School:Drstnct 726A0 0.0072 SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER STUDENT T < 126.00 0.1334 COUNTY PER CAPITA REVENUES S : REVENUES PER CAPITA Taxes;....... :Oftr:TLan Pro .. 4127000 40. Intergovernmental 8778421 87.12 ,::.... . ... ..:.: 2969123.: . 29.47 Miscellaneous 787197 7.81 COUNTY PER CAPITA EXPENDITURES S : EXPENDITURES PER CAPITA Ceneral:Cro�ernment »::: .::::.... ... >>: .:; .;..: :;6251551 . 62.05 Public Safety 5854402 58.10 . ...::.... ;.2760727 27.40 Human Services 15528989 154.12 ... . 7.44 Educato : m Non-Departmental 2343967 23.26 COUNTY PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURE S : EXPENDITURES PER EMPLOYEE ::::::::. s::. ;:c.: »>:::;:;.625155 5756493 ................................ :.... ..... ............ ........................... .... ............................ .. Public Safety 5854402 4368957 ::::::<.::::;:? : ::.>:>:>::<:»:;:;::>;:°:<:::>`.,.;::: >:c>::;:::;c>:s:.;;:-::.;:.. .,:.... .:;. :::,::.::;:;::: .:: .:.2760727.. . 5521454 Human Services 15528989 63051.64 Educatlou Recurnst '.C�t taI_ :::; :>:::: .. ><:::<;,. .... 75f1000 1033.06 SCHOOL DISTRICT PER STUDENT EXPENDITURES S : EXPENDITURES PER STUDENT :.::.::..;.......:..: 7420172. . 1363.00 School District 0 0.00 Stat1.7584881 . 3230.14 State, SCHOOL DISTRICT PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURES S : EXPENDITURES PER EMPLOYEE .... ....:::.. .. County G�crament. 7420172. 10220.62 School District 0 0.00 ...: .::. . 1758488 State 2422160 TAX DATA: ENTER APPLICABLE ASSESSMENT RATIO AND ELDERLY EXEMPTION: County Tax Rate ($). . :::::. .. . . ...::. Q X45(3.:.. Yer� #tl Assessed:Va�lnati+an School District Tax Rate ($) 0.0000 Per$100 Assessed Valuation Elderly Exemption 0 $11,000 Where Applicable SECTION 3 - DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA 15 YEAR 1195: 1996 : : ;;.:.' . 1991' 1998 HOUSING UNITS 3.; 6 10 . 10 POPULATION 8..: 16 ....... .. ...... 27 SCHOOL 00 L CHILDREN Elementary ry Middle a. 1 1 1 High z School 1. TOTAL COUNTY GOVERNMENT RNMENT ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES Ge neral v Go e tame t n Public Safe <6.0 ::........ ... Public Works EIA' 0.0 :* 0.0 Human Services :;E1:0: Q.1 TOTAL SCHOOL 00 L DIS TRI CT 0.1 ': A Azi D D 1TIONAL EMPLOYEES YEES F. YEAR 2000> 2001 >:::;;''. :204 : 2003 ;: :.::;;::. _. 2004 HOUSING ING U NITS Q POPULATION SCHOOL OL CHILDREN Elementary ry Mid dle 1 High School TOTAL T AL COUNTY UNTY GO VE RN110NT ADD ITION AL EMPLOYEES General 1 Gove ram e nt 0.0 0�.. 0.0 0 0 Public Safety O,Q`:' 0.0 0.0m. Public Works ks 0.0 Human an Services rvices 0 ..... .......... TOTAL AL SCHOOL OL DISTRICT CT 0.2 AD D ITION AL EMPLOYEES YEES SOCI`ION 4 — PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON COUNTY GOVERNMENT 16 YEAR 1995 1996 1997 1998 ,_ 1999 TAX BASE($1000) 255 517 :787 895 921 REVENUES ($) Property Tax ' 1902 3860 ': 5874 6678 :. : 6872 Other Taxes 335 690 ><>: . 1066 1218 ., 1254 Intergovernmental 71,4: 1468 2267 2591 2667 Service Charges 241: 497 767 877 902 Miscellaneous 64:; 132 2t1 232 239 TOTAL ($) ;:..:;:> ;;::;:` <::3257 6647 :;::::. IOl.7fr 11597 11933 EXPENDITURES($) General Government 508 1046 16]4:; 1846 1899 Public Safety 476 979 1512.; 1728 :.' 1778 Public Works 224 462 ": .713.; 815 839 Human Services 12fi ; 259V:: :: ::: 4010: 4584 4717 Education .1942: 3996 6168: 7053 7257 Non—Departmental :` 19-1: 692 712 TOTAL (S) :;::` 46©:3`; 9473 14622: 16718 17202 NET FISCAL IMPACT(s) —2826 ;:::::::: `•-4446' —5121 —5269 YEAR 2001 . "2Ei02'? 2003 :'**:: :::.: 2004 TAX BASE 51000 5+#$> 975 :: :;::`:'''` '::.lfiEf4; 1033 W63 .... .... ( ) REVENUES . Pro Tax <: : ?071:; 7276 :,.: >::::: .><:::, 4$$ 7705 7928 PAY Other Taxes :':129 ': 1327 ".. 1366 1406 1446 4 2990 3076 Intergovernmental .... :: 282 2905 Service Charges :>»:928_:: 955 >:'` ';.< '>:<`.. .983: 1011 . .. - 1041 >: g Miscellaneous >: <;: ;?�{G:_ 253 : ;_.. '' :'.::261: 268 276 TOTAL $ ':':`2228th: 12636 `': .:;.]3t142:; 13379 13767 ( ) EXPENDITURES S 2129 2191 General Government .::::1.954: 2011 :; : ' `::" ;2069<: Public Safe ty 1830'< 1883 1938:: 1994 '', 2052 Public Works 940 ::<... : 967 Human Services : :° :: :.:4864: 4995 5:140::: 5289 . 5442 Education X468: 7684 . 790 : 8136 8372 Non—Departmental 733.: 754 . 776: 798 821 TOTAL ($) "`::;17901' 18215 :.:;.. ;.':28743; 19286 19846 NET FISCAL IMPACT S -5422: —5579 ` .' ` -5741 —5907 —6079 SECTION S — PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT 17 YEAR 19 ..: 1998 . >: : 1999 REVENUES NUES O s Conn 3 996 <: "<.:>; :::::6I68:. 7053 School District 7257 0 ::: (}>: 0 >: 0 State ? 445$> 9174 : :::<:: 1416Q 16189 '<> °16659. TOTAL O s 13170 ::::.24328: 23242 ...: �>: :'.:..:..23916 EXPENDITURES NDI TURES S county 942: 3996 6168 7 053 €:'7257 School District State ; .. . 9174 :4416 16189 :: `:16659 TOTAL AL s 9s ` .63 13170 ;.......; .. 23242 NET FISCAL IMPACT s YEAROOQ 2001 : >:::<:<::: ::::.;:::. :.::::;::::.;.::... REVENUES NUES S ( ) Conn tY 468;:. 7 684 ` ;>:<: ;' :::>>:.:`79U'�'' 8136 .....:..8372, School District State 142. 1 7 639 `< >:.; :<:,;I8�hSf�> 18677 ..... 92 18 TOTAL AL S 253 ::.::..?b0�?';' 26813 : ;;':>:`: ?' :;>i::27591: EXPENDITURES ENDI TiJRE S s County tY 468::: 7 >;:.»: 8136 :::::`.>::> ;::>:.::;::::::;8372' School of Dis ' tnct State Z.. 17 18677 <>.;.:: ?';;> ;' �28 2791;T OT AL 25 323 26813 NET FISCAL IMPACT s &CTION 6 — SUMMARY OF PROJECTED DEMOGRAPHIC/FISCALIMPACTS 18 YEAR :1995.: 1996 1997 1998 1999 HOUSING UNITS 3: 6 " 9. 10 10 POPULATION 8 16 25 : 27 27 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 1 »;: ;':2: 2 2 Middle High School :: 1 1 1 TOTAL a..: 3 «.. ..;:<: ;. ::.:4>: 5 5 COUNTY EMPLOYEESfl. 0.1 ``;:.:Q:1. 0.1 0.1 scxooL EMPLOYEES a:L 0.1 ;< 0:2': 0.2 0.2 TAX BASE($1000) ?.55:: 517 ;.:' __" ' :.797 895 921 COUNTY BUDGET(S) Revenues 3257'> 6647 ;': :;>. 101-76.: 11933 Expenditures 4603 9473 14622: 16718 . 17202 BALANCE 1346: —2826 °'.:': ;' .'.;=4446'' —5121 .. —5269 SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET Revenues °.6399.: 13170 :' 20328;. 23242 23916 Expenditures ;::::...6399' 13170 ZE# Z$: 23242 23916 BALANCE 0. 0 : `:::`;:::: : .(t; 0 0 COMBINED BUDGETS(;) - Revenues 9656:: 19817 : ".',:';`30504:. 34839 : 35849 Expenditures 1I01d3: 22643 3495(?: 39960 41118 BALANCE --13" —2826 444b:. —5121 —5269 YEAR 2.110:; 2001 :: ;':";:_. : :2002< 2003 HOUSING UNITS ;:'.:. :,::: Q:: 10 POPULATION '.::: 27 '. >'` ::; `>:;>::;2'`.; 27 27 SCHOOL CHIIAREN Elementary »:. ....:; 2% :» . .. ..:. ... 2 2 1 1 . Middle . ... :......:. ` 1 1 High School .>:.:.....<:1: TOTAL 5 5 0.1 0.1 0.1 ...:.::.:...::.:: ::..::. :.:. LINTY EMPLOYEES ;:;:::>:>>:>::'i;:'"': SCHOOL EMPLOYEES &Z: ;:'.:.I12.'. 0.2 0.2 TAX BASE($1000) g48: 975 ;':`.::«;1004? 1033 1063 COUNTY BUDGET Revenues :;::`::1$2$(}> 12636 ` ' < >13002 13379 13767 Expenditures :17ml::* 18215 :` .... >`>; 18743:: 19286 19846 BALANCE <>.X5422':: —5579 ::> ``::; `'= ?4I° —5907 —6079 SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET($) <: Revenues ;:`2460 25323 <> 26057.-: 26813 . 27591 Expenditures ::;:< 4b09' 25323 .; '`" : `'26Q5T 26813 27591 BALANCE Q` 0 `> ;;.: :0 0 0 COMBINED BUDGETS(S) Revenues 368$1 37959 390641' 40192 41358 Expenditures 42311 43538 448E)E}: 46100 47436 BALANCE 5422 —5579 . '. ``—5741 —5907 —6079 19 EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND DATA SOURCES SECTION 1 -PROJECT DATA Project data includes information about the specific development project. Much, X not all, of the information is supplied by the applicant.Data inputs include: Project Name. Name of the project. Township: Township in which the project is located. School District: School district in which the project is located. Beginning Year: The first year of the project in which dwelling units are completed and occupied. Ending Year: The last year in which dwelling units are completed and occupied. The template is set to calculate fiscal impacts for a ten-year period. Inflation Rate: Unless an inflation rate is entered, the template will calculate fiscal impacts based on constant dollars. Since the inflation rate changes frequently, the Finance Department must be contacted for the most recent figure. Persons/Household:The estimated average number of persons/household(dwelling unit) based on 1990 Census data for the township in which the project is located.This information is supplied by the Planning Department and will be updated as necessary using population projections and building permit data- Children/Household: The estimated average number of school age children/household (dwelling unit) based on 1990 Census data for the township in which the project is located. This information is supplied by the Planning Department and will be updated as necessary using school membership data %Non-Elderly:N.C.General Statutes permit an$11,000 exemption to the elderly and disabled who meet certain income criteria. In the event that elderly units are part of the project, the percentage of eligible non-elderly units is entered. The tax base will automatically be adjusted to reflect the exemption. Number of Homes: The number of dwelling units to be constructed in the project in each year. Average Sales Price:The average sales price of all dwelling units based on the number and sales price of dwelling unit types to be constructed in each year. 20 SECTION 2 - LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA Local government data includes information regarding expenditures required to provide County services and revenues received based on the approved Orange County budget for the fiscal year in which the project is considered for approval.All information derived from the approved budget remains constant throughout a fiscal year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of a new budget. Local government revenue and expenditure information is compiled on a per capita (per person) basis.Per capita figures are derived by dividing the total expenditures for a particular service function or revenue source by the estimated population of Orange County for the year in which the project is considered for approval. Populations estimates are prepared by the Planning Department. Data inputs include the following. Budget Year: The current fiscal year; i.e., 1993-94. Per Capita Revenues: The sources of revenue by major category are as follows: Taxes-Other Than Property:Revenues from taxes other than property taxes include those from sales and use taxes, franchise taxes, and animal taxes. Intergovernmental Aid: Revenues from this source, in the form of categorical aid or shared-tax revenues, are provided through State and federal assistance programs. Service Charges: Service (or user) charges support numerous functions and are charged to those who voluntarily receive governmental services or use governmental facilities. Miscellaneous:Miscellaneous revenues include interest earnings on investments, proceeds from license and permit fees, and all other revenues. Per Capita Expenditures: Expenditures by major category are as follows: General Government: Services related to the legislative, administrative, financial, and legal functions of government. Public Safety: Law enforcement services and emergency medical services. Public Works: Efforts related to the maintenance of County owned property and the provision of sanitation (solid waste disposal) services. Human Services: Departments responsible for the provision of health, social, and recreation-related services. Education: Orange County supports two school units,the Orange County school system and the Chapel Hill\Carrboro school system. This category includes appropriations made to the designated school system for Recurring Capital items. Recurring Capital funds are used for general maintenance,purchase of new equipmentifurnishings and vehicle maintenance. Non-DepartmentaL• Contributions to agencies providing cultural and social services outside the formal structure of county government. Other expenditures include equipment replacement and contingency funds. Although there are no employees generated by this category,it has been included as an operating expenditure. It will be included in Section 4,"Total Annual County Expenditure." These expenditures will be calculated on a per capita basis as opposed to a per employee basis. 21 Per Student Expenditures:Information regarding expenditures required to provide educational services and revenues received are based on the approved school system budgets for the fiscal year in which the project is considered for approval. All information derived from the approved budgets remains constant throughout a fiscal year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of new budgets. Expenditure information is compiled on a per student basis for County Government Current Expense, School District and State appropriations. County Government Current Expense funds are used for general operation purposes including Instruction and Support Services. Federal revenues and expenditures and other local revenues such as Fund Balance have not been included since they are not directly growth related. Per student figures are derived by dividing the total appropriation for educational purposes from a particular source by the estimated number of students to be enrolled in the applicable school system for the year in which the project is considered for approval. Student enrollments are obtained from the approved school system budgets. County Government: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations to the school systems by Orange County for Current Expense. The minimum level of per student appropriation is determined by the State Board of Education. School District:Expenditures in this category are unique to the Chapel Hill-Carrboro school system and are based on the level of expenditures possible through assessment of a supplementary school tax. State: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations from the State Board of Education. School District Per Employee Expenditure: Expenditures per employee based on County, School District and State appropriations, and the total number of school district employees. Employees Per 1000 Population: The number of employees in a particular service category per 1000 population. County Per Employee Expendlture: The average operating and capital expenses per employee in a particular service category. Total expenses in each category includes personnel,operating and capital costs. Other Data County Government Tax Rate: The County tax rate per $100 of assessed valuation. Since the per capita method focuses only on operating expenditures, the tax rate is reduced by an amount equal to the debt service payments from property taxes for capital projects. School District Tax Rate:The supplementary tax assessed on behalf of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro school system. Assessment Ratio:The ratio of market(sales)value to assessed value based on information supplied by the Tax Office. The assessment ratio is used to convert market value to assessed value for the purpose of computing the tax base. Other Model Constants Elderly Exemption:For projects developed partially or exclusively for elderly(65 and older)or disabled individuals whose annual income does not exceed$12,000, an$11,000 tax exemption is used in projecting the tax base. School District Employees Per Student: The number of employees per student in a specific school district. 22 SECTION 3- DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA Demographic projections provide information about the number of new residents and school children anticipated in Orange County resulting from project development.Projections also provide the number of additional employees required per service function and school district as a result of the new development. Total Housing Units: The cumulative total of new housing units added each year by project development. Total Population:The total population added each year by a project derived by multiplying the number of homes to be constructed by the number of persons per household (see Section 1). School Population: The total number of school children added each year by a project derived by multiplying the number of homes constructed by the number of children per household (see Section 1). Additional County Employees: The number of additional employees required per service category based on project development. Total• Total of all additional county employees required based on project development. School District Additional Employees: The number of additional employees required per school district based on the project development. SECTION 4- PROJECTED NET FISCAL UdFACT ON COUNTY Tax Base:The tax base represents the increase in assessed property value expected each year resulting from project development.The values shown are in$1,000's and are derived from a formula which includes the number and sales price of homes, and the assessment ratio. Where applicable, the percentage of non-elderly units and elderly exemption are also used. Revenues:All revenues are derived from a formula which multiplies the per capita revenues (Section 2) times the projected population(Section 3).The exception to this is the property tax which multiplies the tax base times the county government tax rate. Expenditures: All expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies the per employee expenditure (Section 2) times the number of additional employees (Section 3). Net Fiscal Impact:The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures and projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs Orange County more to provide services to a project than it receives in revenues.A positive net balance indicates that more revenues are received than it costs to serve a project. Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset negative balances in another. 23 SECTION 6 - PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT Revenues The County contribution is derived by transferring education expenditures by County government(Section 4).Revenues derived from the school district tax are derived by multiplying the school district tax times the tax base. State revenues are derived by multiplying the per student expenditure figure times the total projected number of school children (Section 3). Expenditures: Expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies each per student expenditure (Section 2) times the total projected number of school children (Section 3) and adding the results. Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures and projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs the school system more to provide educational services for children in a project than it receives in revenues.A positive net balance indicates that more revenues are received than it costs to serve a project.Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset negative balances in another. SECTION 6 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED IMPACTS DRAFT MAY 16, 1994 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Cameron noted that a sentence had been added to A.3 of the Resolution by the County Attorney for clarification. This is also a condition of the Health Department. After the first sentence add: The portion of the easements used for sewage disposal shall remain in a wooded condition with large trees preserved and only selective clearing of young vegetation allowed for system installation. Burklin asked if there is adequate building space on lots 1, 2, and 3. Cameron responded yes, noting that the sewage disposal areas are not on the lots and that with a cluster subdivision setbacks may be reduced. Barrows asked if the adjacent subdivision, Hideaway Estates is built out yet. Cameron responded that in the 1970's, when Hideaway Estates was platted, sewage disposal sites were not identified on each lot. Thus, some of the lots are not built on because of lack of an approved sewage disposal site. Barrows continued expressing concern that the open space designated for this subdivision might be used as sewage disposal sites. Cameron responded that there can be no sewage easements for lots not in the Tapp Subdivision. Mr. Homer Tapp, applicant, stated that a Co-op will be formed with the property owners in the proposed subdivision. There is no connection or involvements with Hideaway Estates. MOTION: Burklin moved approval as recommended by the Planning Staff with the change as recommended by the County Attorney. Seconded by Hoecke. VOTE: Unanimous. (2) Mill Pointe (10 Lots Cedar Grove Township) Presentation by Eddie Kirk. The property is located in Cedar Grove Township on the west side of Mill Creek Road (SR 1343) . Mill Creek Road is a paved State-maintained road and considered a collector in the Comprehensive Plan. A 1991 traffic count indicated 900 trips per day. 25 The total acreage of the tract is 12.08 acres. Ten ( 10) lots are proposed which average 45, 393 square feet in size. New lots will be served by individual wells and septic tanks. The property is located in the Back Creek Watershed. It is designated as Agricultural Residential (AR) and Back Creek Watershed in the Comprehensive Plan. A public road is proposed to serve eight (8) of the ten ( 10) lots in the subdivision. The short cul-de-sac would extend west off Mill Creek Road. The Concept Plan was approved by the Planning Board at its September 20, 1993 meeting with two conditions. Agency comments were received from Emergency Management, Recreation and Parks, Soil and Water Conservation, Erosion Control, and NCDOT. The two conditions and applicable agency comments have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval (an attachment to these minutes on pages ) . NCDOT was concerned with the angle of the right-of-way of Mill Pointe Lane and Mill Creek Road. A condition has been included in the resolution to address that concern. The Planning Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan for Mill Pointe subject to the conditions contained in the Resolution of Approval. Barrows expressed concern that the impact of development is creating a negative balance for the county. She felt the developer should bear those costs, rather than the remainder of the county. Willis responded that there is a $750.00 school impact fee and the payment-in-lieu parkland payment through the subdivision process. Barrows continued that the burden should be on the developer to help pay for the infrastructure needed for the developments being proposed and felt there should be an impact fee to help cover those costs. Jobsis reminded the Board that the issue of impact fees had been to public hearing a year or so ago and was so controversial that it was temporarily tabled by the Commissioners. She continued that she felt it is an issue that will come up again but that it is not something that the Planning Board can address at this time. Brown asked about the Impact Fee Analysis. 26 Willis indicated Collins provided that information and Brown asked that Collins explain that at the next Planning Board meeting. MOTION: Jobsis moved approval as recommended by the Planning Staff. Seconded by Walters. VOTE: Unanimous. (3) Hickory Hill ( 16 Lots - Eno Township) Presentation by Eddie Kirk. The property is located in Eno Township on the northeast side of Palmer's Grove Church Road (SR 1582) . It is zoned Agricultural Residential and L-Eno-PW. It is designated Agricultural Residential and Lower Eno Watershed in the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan for Orange County. Land uses in the area include Spirit Hill Subdivision and other single family lots. The subdivision will be served by individual wells and septic tanks. The total acreage of the tract is 20.34 acres. Sixteen ( 16) lots are proposed that average 1 . 15 acres in size. The lots all front on Mary E. Cook Drive which is proposed to be public and constructed to State standards. Mary E. Cook Drive follows an existing private right-of-way and extends north off of Palmer's Grove Church Road which is a paved secondary State road. The Planning Board approved the Concept Plan at its January 24, 1994 meeting with the condition that all lots must receive access from Mary E. Cook Drive. Agency comments were received from the County Attorney, Emergency Management, Recreation and Parks, Soil and Water Conservation, Erosion Control and NCDOT. Applicable comments have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval (an an attachment to these minutes on pages ) . There was a concern from the County Attorney about the small portion of the road being in lot 3 of Spirit Hill Subdivision. The concern was about the dedication and how it would take place. There were two options: 1) that ownership could be transferred to the owner of Spirit Hill Subdivision; or 2) the owner of lot 3 could sign