Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 02-28-1994 - C.1.c J OR AN G E C 0 U N T Y BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date: February 28, 1994 Action Agenda Item # 02. 1. c . SUBJECT: PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT ARTICLE 22 - DEFINITIONS DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING X Yes No ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Willis Extension 2583 Proposed Amendment TELEPHONE NUMBERS: Hillsborough - 732-8181 Durham - 688-7331 Mebane - 227-2031 Chapel Hill - 967-9251 PURPOSE: To receive citizen comments on a proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to clearly define the point at which a subdivision lot is "created" for the purpose of determining whether or not the lot is subject to amendments which may be made to the Zoning Ordinance or Subdivision Regulations. BACKGROUND: It is often the case that lots which existed prior to a particular amendment to the Zoning Ordinance are not subject to the amended provisions. The date on which a lot is "created" can be critical in determining whether or not a lot can be developed in the manner requested. It has been the policy of Orange County to recognize lots which have been approved through the applicable review and approval process as existing, even if the final step of recording the subdivision has not occurred. Major Subdivisions are considered approved when the Preliminary Plan Resolution of Approval is adopted by the Board of Commissioners. Minor Subdivisions are considered approved upon approval of a Final Plat by the Planning Staff. The proposed amendment makes explicit the existing policy of recognizing approved lots as "lots of record" for purposes of determining whether or not they are subject to newly-adopted regulations. RECOMMMATION: Article 20.3 of the Zoning Ordinance requires that the Zoning Officer's recommendation be presented to the Planning Board within 30 days of receipt of an application. However, Article 20.4 exempts any application for amendments to the Zoning Ordinance by either the public or the County from the provisions of Article 20.3. In either case, though, the public hearing is the time scheduled for presentation of the Zoning Officer's recommendation. Zoning Officer Recommendation Provided that the Planning Board and Board of Commissioners find in the affirmative, the Zoning Officer recommends approval of the proposed text amendment. Administration Recommendation The Administration recommends that the proposed amendments be referred to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board of Commissioners no sooner than April 4, 1994. 1 PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ORDINANCE: ZONING ORDINANCE REFERENCE: ARTICLE 22 - DEFINITIONS ORIGIN OF AMENDMENT: Staff Planning Board BOCC Public Other: County Attorney STAFF PRIORITY RECOMMENDATION: High Middle _x_ Low Comment: PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 28, 1994 PURPOSE OF AMENDMENT: To clearly define the point at which a subdivision lot is "created" for the purpose of determining whether or not the lot is subject to amendments which may be made to the Zoning Ordinance or Subdivision Regulations. IMPACTS/ISSUES: It is often the case that lots which existed prior to a particular amendment to the Zoning Ordinance are not subject to the amended provisions. The date on which a lot is "created" can be critical in determining whether or not a lot can be developed in the manner requested. From a legal standpoint, a subdivision lot is "created" at the time that a Final Plat for the subdivision is recorded with the Register of Deeds. However, it has been the policy of Orange County to recognize lots which have been approved through the applicable review and approval process as existing, even if the final step of recording the subdivision has not occurred. Major Subdivisions are considered approved when the Preliminary Plan Resolution of Approval is adopted by the Board of Commissioners. It may take months, or in the case of large subdivisions, several years for all of the lots to be recorded, depending on how long it may take to construct roads and other improvements required as part of the project approval. Minor Subdivisions are considered approved upon approval of a Final Plat by the Planning Staff. The Final Plat includes conditions which must be met before the Subdivision can be recorded. The Final 2 Plat must be recorded within six months of approval. The proposed amendment makes explicit the existing policy of recognizing approved lots as "lots of record" for purposes of determining whether or not they are subject to newly-adopted regulations. EXISTING ORDINANCE PROVISIONS AND PROPOSED AMENDMENT: t Article 22 - Definitions Lot, Creation of - A lot shall be recognized as "created" for Purposes of compliance with this Ordinance, at the time of Preliminary Plan approval in the case of a Major Subdivision, and Final Plat approval in the case of a Minor Subdivision. 3 A lot shall no longer be recognized as having been created if a Final Plat was not approved and recorded within its required time limit and the Preliminary Plan expired. This definition does not apply to lots of record. ********************************** ORDINANCE REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE: January 19, 1994 PLANNING BOARD REVIEW: BOCC REVIEW: 1 - i a t