Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 11-18-2014-13 (2)INFORMATION ITEM f, 0 1[ i? n Orange County Asset Management Services Jeffrey E. Thompson, Director To: Bonnie Hammersley, Orange County Manager From: Wayne Fenton, Assistant Director, Asset Management Services Date: November 18, 2014 RE: Space Study Work Group Progress Information Item Attached is a progress update of the Space Study Work Group formed by the Board's action on June 17, 2014. .w . eq ►,t�Eal A full report is scheduled to be delivered to the Board in March, 2015 during the FY2015 -2016 Capital Investment Planning process. m I {�; jfIllvr-- & ■ Please contact me should you have any questions or comments. Regards, �Lc Wayne Fenton Assistant Director, Asset ManagE 919- 245 -2628 wfenton@orangecountync.gov- c1 � P.O. Box 8181 * 131 West Margaret Lane _3rd Floor* Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 Telephone: Area Code 919 245 -2625 Fax: 644 -3001 E -mail: jethompson @orangecountync.gov 1 I Orange County Space Study Work Group Progress Update BACKGROUND At its June 17, 2014 meeting, the Board of County Commissioners ( "the Board ") established a Space Study Work Group and adopted a charge for the group (Attachment 'A'). This Space Study Work Group continues an iterative process of evaluating existing space for its ability to meet County needs, and planning for improved, more efficient use where possible, as well as planning for new or renovated space at appropriate times. This information informs the County's capital improvement plan ( "CIP ") process. The Space Study Work Group consists of: Earl McKee, BOCC Vice -chair James Stanford, Clerk of Courts Renee Price, BOCC James Grove, Emergency Services Nancy Coston, DSS Colleen Bridger, Health David Hunt, Commissioners Office Janice Tyler, Department on Aging Peter Sandbeck, Department of Environment, Agr, Parks & Recreation Dave Stancil, Department of Environment, Agriculture, Parks & Recreation Jim Northrup, Information Technologies Jeff Thompson, Asset Management Services Wayne Fenton, Asset Management Services Departments without direct representation on the Work Group have been included in related Space Study Sub - groups and report progress to the main group. Several of these Sub - groups related to existing capital improvement projects have been, and will continue to meet. Other groups will begin meeting in December 2014. The Board adopted study framework, entitled "Board adopted framework for iterative, continuous space study', is included here as Attachment 'B'. The framework is founded in the original Board - established 2001 framework and guiding principles, as well as the major space study framework update in 2005 and was further updated and adopted by the Board at its June 18, 2013 meeting. The Space Study Work Group has met four times, including most recently on November 11. The key focus for the Group's initial work has been an examination of how well existing buildings meet Board adopted space study criteria, as well as related criteria identified by the Work Group. This interim report presents information and findings primarily related to the County's existing building inventory and short -term needs. Detailed facility assessment information has been included here as Attachments 'C' through V. The information in this progress update report will be included as a new section in an update of the May 2013 Orange County Facility Report, available at: http: / /www.co.orange. nc.us /AssetMgmt /documents /0rangeCountVFaci IityReport- MaV2013.pdf 1 Orange County Space Study Work Group Progress Update SPACE STUDY WORK GROUP PROCESS The work group's iterative process is illustrated in Figure 1. This process is intended to continually review and update the County's use of existing space, as well as identifying "needs" and "wants" for new or renovated space, which can and does change over time. Facility Inventory & Assessment CIP Budget Process Demand Analysis Work Group Projected Consensus Space Need FIGURE 1 ORANGE COUNTY BUILDINGS 3 Current progress point in Group's work Growth and development of new buildings in Orange County has occurred over time in keeping with County growth and development, and changes in the programs and services provided by the County. In addition to buildings occupied by Orange County employees and facilities used to deliver services to Orange County residents, County governments in North Carolina also provide facilities for judicial system functions. Indeed, one of the oldest and certainly the most recognized buildings in Orange County is the Historic Courthouse, dating to 1845. Much development in more recent times has corresponded to previous space studies that were performed when needs were identified. Most recently, this included the addition of several new or expanded facilities during the mid to late 2000s. Figure 2 shows the growth from 1980 through 2014 in gross square footage of County buildings. While a number of County and Court system buildings were added or expanded during this time period, two key impacts on the increase in gross square footage were the addition of the 2 M Orange County Space Study Work Group Progress Update Builder's First Source property at 401 Valley Forge Rd in 1997 (105,000 gross square feet) and the Eno River Parking Deck in 2012 (147,122 gross square feet). 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 FIGURE 2 Gross Square Feet - 1980 - 2014 O N �* l0 W O N �* l0 W O N �* l0 W O N �* W W W W W M M M M M O O O O O r-1 r-1 r-1 r\-1 r\-1 r\-1 r\-1 r\-I r\-1 r\-1 r\-1 r\-1 r\-I SPACE MEASUREMENT DEFINITIONS ■ GSF All commercial and institutional buildings include a number of different space types. Two industry associations for facility management — the Building Owners and Managers Association (BOMA) and the International Facility Management Association (IFMA) — provide industry standard techniques and definitions for the measurement and evaluation of space within buildings. The figures that follow, using the ground floor of the Link Government Services Center as an example, present an overview of some of the key space types and measurements used when comparing and evaluating space within buildings. These include: • Gross area: measured from the outside face of exterior walls, this represents the building "footprint" times the number of floors, excluding an voids, such as two story atriums (Figure 3); • Assignable area: includes all office space, storage space, meeting space, and circulation space that is directly assigned to, and exclusively available to, an individual department, measured inner wall surface to inner wall surface (Figure 4); • Service areas: includes restrooms and custodial storage spaces (Figure 5); • Circulation areas: includes entry vestibules, lobbies, corridors, stairwells and other means of travel within a building, both those areas assigned to departments and those 9 Orange County Space Study Work Group Progress Update shared areas on individual floors (floor lobby areas) and those shared across all building occupants (building entrances, lobbies) (Figure 6); • Mechanical / electrical /plumbing /voice /data: includes building equipment spaces (Figure 7); • Structural space: The difference between the Gross Area and the Net Useable Area of the building. This is space that cannot be occupied or used because of building structural features ((Figure 8); • Net Usable Area: The aggregate interior area of the building that can be occupied, measured from inner wall to inner wall. This number is the sum of Assignable and Non - Assignable Space. FIGURE 3 GROSS SQUARE FEET 7` Mimi f FFIGURE 5 SERVICE AREA SQUARE FEET FIGURE 7 MECHANICAL AREA 4 SQUARE FEET IL FIGURE 4 L ASSIGNABLE SQUARE FEET FIGURE 6 CIRCULATION SQUARE FEET FIGURE 8 STRUCTURAL AREA SQUARE FEET 5 Orange County Space Study Work Group Progress Update BUILDING INFORMATION The information that follows presents key background information about County owned and leased buildings. Gross Square Footage by primary building occupancy While a number of buildings include a variety of space use functions, each building has a primary occupancy type. For example, the Central Recreation Center contains offices, but its primary function is "Recreation /Community Centers ". Information related to the percentage of gross square footage by primary occupancy for each building is present in Figure 9. The largest category is "Office" at approximately 29 %, with "Recreation and Community Centers" second at approximately 18 %. The general category "Recreation and Community Centers" also includes senior centers due to the activities provided at these locations. The category of "Office" here includes only County occupied buildings. While many of the buildings included in the "Courts" category also contain offices, they have been rolled up in the single Courts category. FIGURE 9 Building Gross Square Feet by Primary Occupancy 8,765,1% 9,880,1% W 77,112,8% 87,625,9% 40,227, 4% 24,579,3% It 181,740, 18% 111,000,11% 147,122, 15% 291,969, 29% 5 10,800, 1% • Courts • Detention • Emergency Svcs • Leased to others • Maintenance • Office • Parking • Recreation /Community Ctrs Solid Waste Services Specialty Storage Orange County Space Study Work Group Progress Update County Occupied Usable Square Footage by Office Building Location Figure 10 presents a breakdown of the usable square footage in County buildings that are identified as primarily Office use buildings. 52,728 FIGURE 10 Office Building Usable Square Feet 7,063 2 117 7.087 24,045 16,886 42,431 7 ■ Orange Public Transportation (OPT] ■ Government Services Annex • Link Government Services Center • Gateway Center • West Campus Office Building ■ Whitted Center • Environment & Ag Ctr • Hillsborough Commons Southern Human Services Center 501 West Franklin Street Usable Square Footage - Office Buildings Table 1 presents the usable square footage in each building where the primary occupancy is identified as "Office" for County occupied buildings (does not include Court system related buildings) as well as the percentage of gross square footage that is identified as "usable" square footage in each. The Whitted Center has the lowest ratio of gross to usable square footage, primarily due to the heavy masonry construction of the facility (eighteen inch exterior and corridor walls). 9 Orange County Space Study Work Group Progress Update Usable Square Footage — Office Buildings Buildings Usable Square Feet Percentage of gross square footage that is usable Orange Public Transportation (OPT) Government Services Annex Link Government Services Center Gateway Center West Campus Office Building Whitted Center Environment & Ag Ctr Hillsborough Commons Southern Human Services Center 501 West Franklin Street 2,117 88.21% 7,087 74.24% 21,354 82.16% 19,966 87.39% 41,492 88.82% 42,431 67.24% 16,886 88.47% 52,728 94.16% 24,045 84.04% 7,063 95.34% TOTAL: 235,169 Assigned Square Footage by department Asset Management Services identifies the space within County buildings in keeping with the BOMA /IFMA standards demonstrated above. Figure 11 provides an overview of the assigned space within County- occupied buildings. Common areas, service areas, shared use spaces, etc. are not included in this chart. 0 N c� '5 2� C/] a� U r ^� V J V cu 0 w � dA W m D O Q p LL L m 3 r Y tv .N H Q a o 2'1 V) =) M 5; m LU LU Z w O U � a w V H O V) V) O M a — J D a n O LUi U LL LL 0 N Ln Ln U U 0 m 5. O O a) N M pp M �.o a X a w Z D a =) 0 00 O U 2 U V LU U w M V) � J a Ln U 0 V) Ql ri N d a 0 r, N 00 M C7 Z a z N N LL LL E LU 2 V) Ln U � w 0 O Z a O 0 U J I M o of I� w � � OU L LU L Ln U U_ V w w > UZ v r V) w LU w LL cw L / — — a m U V Z L Lu Z_ U r, LL > z w 0 J 0 U M Z 2 2 � J J w w 2 Ln Z U-) O 1O 00 LL LU M H N � � 2 06 M m Z ~ C (D C J — V in z Z Z w z O in Z U LL gw 0 a a V) C7 z w — Q) 0 Lf) 2 0 U (7 Z V) D 0 2 O M Z N a V LU U 2 D 0 V) w •• Q) 0 Lf) 2 0 U (7 Z V) D 0 2 O M Z N a V LU U 2 D 0 V) w •• 10 Orange County Space Study Work Group Progress Update STUDY GROUP FINDINGS A summary of key building information is presented in Attachment 'C' (building name, address, gross and usable square footage, etc.) Existing County buildings were evaluated using the "Board adopted framework for iterative, continuous space study ". These criteria included: • Adequacy of existing space to meet future needs; • Accessibility (ability of customers to travel to, and park at facilities where services they are seeking are provided). Accessibility as it relates to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act will be reviewed in conjunction with the Inspections department and reported in the final report in March 2015; • Facility condition (projected year of next replacement of major infrastructure components) is identified in Attachment V; • Potential for growth (within buildings, as well as expansion on site) is identified in Attachment 'E'; • Other intangible values (historic value, social value, etc.) were discussed by the Study Group but determined to be too difficult to identify in an objective evaluation format. Gross Square Footage by building age Information regarding building age (count and gross square footage are presented in Table 2. This information relates to the date of original construction of buildings and so does not take into account subsequent renovations or equipment replacement. Table 2 Building Age — Count and Gross Sauare Footage Age Count Gross Square Feet 0 -5 years old 6 106,070 6 -10 years old 6 284,138 11+ years old 44 616,632 N 11 Orange County Space Study Work Group Progress Update Technology Technology offers the potential for greater space efficiency in the future. Work environments have changed and continue to change significantly due to the use of laptops, tablets, smartphones and wide - spread availability of wifi service, offering opportunities for more collaborative, less structured work environments that do not require being "tethered" to individual offices. This also provides the opportunity to increase the use of private offices that may currently be in use for only part of the day, by allowing shared use. Meeting spaces can also be used more efficiently by allowing collaborative work to be performed on a routine basis in the spaces. Technology also offers the potential for far greater use of electronic record and document storage and retrieval. The Information Technology department has worked with several departments already, and continues to work with others to digitize and make searchable records, allowing some physical space to be repurposed from records storage to more valuable office, meeting, or other space uses. New Construction There is no identified need for new construction beyond current projects (Cedar Grove Community Center, Environment and Agriculture Center, Southern Branch Library, Orange County Jail, and the Southern Campus Master Plan). Unused and /or unassigned space, and space not being used for its intended purpose (i.e., office space being used for storage) remains available in several County buildings. A complete summary of unused and /or unassigned space and space not being used for its intended purpose will be included in the final report. Real estate costs are the second highest expense for most companies and organizations, after personnel costs. While the County owns the majority of the space that is occupied by County staff, the properties that it owns represent a huge investment of County dollars. As such, it is critical to ensure space is being used at its highest and best purpose. A detailed analysis of current use of space in County building will be included as one of the "Next Steps" (see next section) for the Work Group NEXT STEPS The Work Group will next focus its attention on identification of short and long -term space utilization and priority, which will provide routine input to the capital investment planning process. Work will include: • Current space use analysis • Current practices for records and other storage • Opportunities for improved efficiency • Underutilization of existing space • Sub -group input to Space Group 10 12 Orange County Space Study Work Group Progress Update • Long -term needs analysis - program and service delivery ( "needs" versus "wants ") • Capital investment plan process The findings and outcomes from this work will be included in the final report in March 2015. 11 13 Orange County Space Study Work Group Progress Update ATTACHMENTS Orange County Space Study Work Group Progress Update ATTACH M ENT 'A' Space Study Work Group Charge (BOCC adopted on June 17, 2014) 1. Work with County staff to provide recommendations to the Board on the utilization of space within existing County facilities as well as the need for new or renovated space, to include but not be limited to, approved master planned County campus sites, and; 2. Consider record retention regulations and recommend longer retention periods for select records, if desired, and; 3. Develop a records retention policy to be managed by Asset Management Services as part of an annual records destruction event, and; 4. Develop a comprehensive policy for storage of non - record items, and 5. Assess and recommend structural or procedural mechanisms in support of these goals. 13 14 15 Orange County Space Study Work Group Progress Update ATTACHMENT'B' Space Study Framework (BOCC adopted on June 18, 2013) 1. Purpose: The purpose of this space study framework is to provide staff a Board adopted set of guidelines to systematically inventory, assess, and manage County facility needs on a continuous basis. Specifically, the framework addresses: a. Space inventory (facility report updated May 2013) b. Projected space requirements through 2020 (short term; extended from original target of meeting needs up to 2010 in 2005 space study update) c. Projected space needs that may fall beyond 2020 time frame (long term; extended from original target of meeting needs up to 2010 in 2005 space study update) d. Identified space issues that may affect quality of service to County customers e. The systematic gathering, review and management of departmental space needs that impact services (i.e. service trends, locational needs, technology, growth and /or contraction) f. The presentation of options and recommendations to the Board that prioritize, optimize, manage, and ultimately meet County space needs in a reasonable and useful manner 2. Guiding Principles: a. Board Adopted in 2001: • Co- location of departments with similar functions and /or those that serve the same customer base • Consolidation of County operations to as few sites as may be practicable in an attempt to gain operational efficiency and customer access • Owning facilities in which County operations are located, as opposed to leasing, except where there exists a compelling business reason to do so b. Additional Guiding Principle Board Adopted in 2005: • Building and maintaining facilities and spaces according to sustainable practices and high performance building standards (Board adopted Environmental Responsibility Goals) c. Additional Guiding Principle Board Adopted in 2013: 16 Orange County Space Study Work Group Progress Update • Evaluation of the relative cost and benefit of facilities use where those facilities are stressed — "fully and /or practically depreciated ". This principle is necessary in order to manage the facility to its highest and best use while planning and providing for the potentially displaced space need. 3. Basis of Stuft The study will include a review of the use of all County buildings, along with a description of the space needs of each County department and other users of County buildings (e.g. District Attorney). These assessments will serve as a fundamental work product and will form the basis for the scope of the study: a. Management and Staff Assessment and Input. The Metrics of this Assessment are as follows: i. Management evaluation and comment ii. Staff evaluation, collected and documented by the user questionnaire established in 2001 b. Physical Assessment and Inventory. The Metrics of this Assessment are as follows: i. Physical report (staff and consultant) ii. Maintenance and utility report (staff) iii. Identification of stressed and under - utilized assets iv. Valuation of stressed and under - utilized assets through a Net Present Value Calculation (staff) c. Departmental Space Needs Programming housed within stressed or under - utilized assets (staff and consultant) 4. Scope of Stu ft The scope of the study will be based upon the before - mentioned Basis of Study data, analysis, and conclusions and will be framed by: a. Space needs required no later than 2020; as well as beyond 2020 — based upon: i. management and staff assessments, ii. facility assessments, iii. identified stressed or underutilized assets, iv. identified Board, management, and departmental needs; b. Board adopted strategic planning initiatives 17 Orange County Space Study Work Group Progress Update 5. Options and Recommendations: The criteria and decision factors for recommended space study action that are suggested for Board adoption are as follows: a. Making decisions based upon the before - mentioned guiding principles: 0 Consolidation 0 Centralization 0 Ownership 0 Sustainable building operation and programming 0 Cost and benefit analysis b. Minimizing under - utilized spaces c. Formulating reasonable, defensible courses of action for stressed facilities d. Providing exceptional facilities for County service delivery e. Meeting longstanding, publicly supported needs f. Recognizing, anticipating, and planning for growth (and contraction) trends 6. Timeline and Horizon: Staff will recommend space need prioritization, scheduling and funding sources to the Board for comment and adoption each fall prior to the annual Capital Investment Planning process. This space study framework is recommended to be fully updated every 5th year, with annual status reports to be presented to the Board each fall before the budget season. These updates may serve as a vehicle to recognize and address the trends and strategic directions and receive Board guidance outside of the budget process. This space study framework will be used for a systematic study of County facility space needs in 2013. iagement Services Inventory Facility 600 Highway 86 North Hillsborough I Specialty 4,663 1 TBD 1976 WN EAST CAMPUS et Annex 109 Court Street Hillsborough ouse 150 East King Street Hillsborough torney Building 144 East Margaret Lane Hillsborough ler Jones Law Office 131 Court Street Hillsborough vlarket Pavilion 140 East Margaret Lane Hillsborough ant Services Annex 208 South Cameron Street Hillsborough )urthouse 100 East King Street Hillsborough nter 106 East Margaret Lane Hillsborough rnment Services Center 200 South Cameron Street Hillsborough )unty Jail 125 Court Street Hillsborough ender building 129 East King Street Hillsborough Office 8,500 5,605 1936/1962 22,741 Specialty 2,713 TBD 1790 24,045 Office 7,359 4,605 1967 TBD Specialty 360 TBD 1939 TBD Specialty 3,453 3,453 2007 TBD Office 12,450 7,087 1968 2009 Specialty 7,128 4,662 1845 2009 Specialty 64,937 34,977 2008 Office 25,991 21,354 1992 Specialty 40,227 TBD 1925/1981/1997 Office 7,060 5,958 1947 WN WEST CAMPUS enter 228 South Churton Street Hillsborough )unty Library 137 West Margaret Lane Hillsborough pus Office Building 131 West Margaret Lane Hillsborough Parking Deck Nash & Kollock Street Hillsborough Office 22,846 19,966 2008 22,741 Specialty 23,454 16,932 2009 24,045 Office 46,716 41,492 2009 TBD Specialty 147,122 TBD 2008 TBD CENTER CAMPUS !creation Center 302 West Tryon Street Hillsborough Specialty 19,000 17,351 1957 enter 300 West Tryon Street Hillsborough Office 63,100 42,431 1922/1936/1957 DAD CAMPUS y Services Sub - station #1 (Revere Rd) 306 Revere Road Hillsborough 2nt & Ag Ctr 306 Revere Road Hillsborough ad storage building 306 Revere Road Hillsborough Specialty 1,310 1,094 1960 22,741 Office 19,087 16,886 1960 24,045 Specialty 1,702 TBD 1960 TBD .EX CAMPUS �ange Senior Center 103 Meadowlands Drive Hillsborough Specialty 19,000 16,876 2008 Incl. < 101 Meadowlands Drive Hillsborough Specialty 80,903 TBD 1995 Hope Church Road 1914 New Hope Church Road Hillsborough Forge Road 401 Valley Forge Road Hillsborough y Services Center 510 Meadowlands Drive Hillsborough igh Commons 113 Mayo Street Hillsborough Food & Agriculture Processing Center 500 Valley Forge Road Hillsborough Office 6,000 5,545 1983/1992 22,741 Specialty 105,000 TBD TBD 24,045 Specialty 22,069 21,212 1989 TBD Office 56,000 52,728 1988 TBD I Specialty 10,400 TBD 1985 ve Community Center 5800 Highway 86 North Cedar Grove I Specialty 1 30,782 1 TBD 1 1951/1957 �eks Community Center 117 Richmond Road Efland y Services Sub - station #4 (Mt. Willing Rd) 1120 Mount Willing Road Efland Soccer Center building 4701 West Ten Road Efland Specialty 2,755 TBD 1992 22,741 Specialty 1,200 TBD 1992 24,045 Specialty 2,520 TBD 2009 TBD gory: identifies if primary use is office or specialty >tructed ": identifies the year of construction of a building, or individual sectors, over time (i.e., Whitted - 1922, 1936, 1957) value ": includes only structure - property not included Nth opportunity limited as long as facility remains as special use. N CAMPUS >enior Center 2551 Homestead Road Chapel Hill Human Services Center 2501 Homestead Road Chapel Hill Specialty 26,780 22,741 2007 Office 28,612 24,045 1997 ISTREET Franklin Street 501 West Franklin Street Chapel Hill flopment Center 503 West Franklin Street Chapel Hill Office 7,408 7,063 1930's incl v Specialty 13,232 11,885 1930's rvices Center 1601 Eubanks Road Chapel Hill Le Administration building 1207 Eubanks Road Chapel Hill Specialty 23,500 21,212 2009 Office 9,880 TBD 2009 TBD gory: identifies if primary use is office or specialty >tructed ": identifies the year of construction of a building, or individual sectors, over time (i.e., Whitted - 1922, 1936, 1957) value ": includes only structure - property not included Nth opportunity limited as long as facility remains as special use. )I I lyyb I I LUlb lyyb LUZb iagement Services Inventory Facility 1976 2015 N/A N/A N/A WN EAST CAMPUS et Annex ouse torney Building ler Jones Law Office Jlarket Pavilion ant Services Annex )urthouse nter rnment Services Center )unty Jail ender building 1936/1962 Geo- thermal, roof replacement 2034 2029 2015 2038 1790 2009 2020 To be verified 2022 2039 1967 Geo - thermal, roof replacement 2031 2029 2025 2039 1839 2008 2018 N/A N/A N/A 2007 CENTER CAMPUS 2027 N/A 2037 2015 1968 Roof replacement 2031 2020 To be verified 2023 1845 Geo - thermal DAD CAMPUS y Services Sub - station #1 (Revere Rd) 2nt & Ag Ctr ad storage building 1960 2008 To be verified To be verified 2042 2015/2018/2023 2038 2038 1960 1992 Geo - thermal 2017 2042 2022 1925/1981/1997 Geo - thermal 2015/2018 2029 1995 1947 To be verified 2026 2016 2031 Hope Church Road Forge Road y Services Center igh Commons Food & Agriculture Processing Center WN WEST CAMPUS enter )unty Library pus Office Building Parking Deck 2008 2023(condo) 2023 2038 2009 2029 2024 2039 2009 2029 2024 2039 2008 N/A N/A 2038 CENTER CAMPUS !creation Center enter 1957 Restroom upgrades 2015 2018 2033 1922/1936/1957 BOCC space, Health reno's 2023 2019 2042 DAD CAMPUS y Services Sub - station #1 (Revere Rd) 2nt & Ag Ctr ad storage building 1960 Reno's for ES occupancy To be verified To be verified 2042 1960 As part of building renovation /replacement 1960 To be verified N/A N/A N/A .EX CAMPUS �ange Senior Center < 2008 2028 2023 2038 1995 To be verified To be verified 2025 Hope Church Road Forge Road y Services Center igh Commons Food & Agriculture Processing Center 1983/1992 leased to OC Schools To be verified To be verified 2022 1972 leased to Blders First Source Leased to Builder's First Source. BFS pays all maintenance costs. 1989 To be verified 2020 2035 1988 2008 (leased bld) 2015 (partial) 2038 1985 Renovated for PFAP occupancy 2035 To be verified To be verified To be verifier E ve Community Center 1951/1957 complete reno - 2015 2015 2015 2015 �eks Community Center y Services Sub - station #4 (Mt. Willing Soccer Center building 1992 Roof replacement 2033 2015 2022 1992 To be verified To be verified To be verified To be verifier 2009 2029 2024 2039 N CAMPUS >eniorCenter Human Services Center 2007 2027 2022 2037 1997 2017 2017 2027 ISTREET Franklin Street flopment Center 1930's 2020 2020 2027 1930's 2015/2019 2015 2027 rvices Center Le Administration building 2009 2029 2024 2039 2009 2029 2024 2039 cted ": identifies the year of construction of a building, or individual sectors, over time (i.e., Whitted sectors - 1922, 1936, 1957). e ": identifies the projected year of installation or replacement of system /major components, based on standard projected useful life, not individual assets that may )laced, or minor additions made to the original system. Actual date of replacement will vary based on observed conditions, and may be shorter or longer than industry h small storage building 2,400 TBD TBD Yes Yes No TBD High TBD )I 10,800 TBD TBD Yes Yes No TBD N/A TBD Svcs Inventory Facility 4,663 TBD TBD Yes Yes No TBD High TBD WN EAST CAMPUS et Annex 8,500 5,605 TBD No No Yes TBD Low TBD ouse 2,713 TBD TBD No Yes Yes TBD Low TBD torney Building 7,359 4,605 TBD No No Yes TBD Medium TBD ler Jones Law Office 360 N/A TBD N/A N/A Yes TBD N/A TBD Jlarket Pavilion 3,453 TBD TBD Yes Yes No TBD N/A TBD ant Services Annex 12,450 7,087 TBD Yes No Yes TBD Medium TBD )urthouse 7,128 4,662 TBD No No Yes TBD Low TBD nter 64,937 34,977 TBD Yes Yes No TBD Medium TBD rnment Services Center 25,991 21,354 TBD Yes Yes No TBD High TBD )unty Jail 40,227 TBD TBD Yes No Yes (partial) TBD N/A TBD ender building 7,060 5,958 TBD Yes No TBD TBD Medium TBD WN WEST CAMPUS enter 22,846 19,966 TBD No No No TBD Medium TBD )unty Library 23,454 16,932 TBD Yes No No TBD TBD TBD pus Office Building 46,716 41,492 TBD Yes No No TBD Medium TBD Parking Deck 147,122 TBD TBD TBD (2) No No TBD N/A TBD CENTER CAMPUS !creation Center 19,000 17,351 TBD Yes (footnote) No Yes TBD Medium TBD enter 63,100 42,431 TBD Yes Yes Yes TBD Low TBD DAD CAMPUS y Svcs STn #1 (Revere Rd) 1,310 1,094 TBD Yes Yes No TBD Medium TBD ant & Ag Ctr 19,087 16,886 TBD Yes Yes No TBD Medium TBD ad storage building 1,702 TBD TBD Yes Yes No TBD High TBD .EX CAMPUS �ange Senior Center 19,000 16,876 TBD Special use Yes No TBD TBD TBD C 80,903 1 TBD TBD Yes Yes No TBD Low TBD Hope Church Road 6,000 5,545 TBD Yes Yes No TBD Medium TBD Forge Road 105,000 TBD TBD Yes Yes No TBD TBD TBD y Services Center 22,069 21,212 TBD Yes Yes No TBD Medium TBD igh Commons 56,000 52,728 TBD Yes (leased) Yes (leased) No TBD Medium TBD Food & Ag Process Center 10,400 TBD TBD Special use No No TBD Low TBD ve Community Center 1 30,782 1 TBD I TBD I Yes (footnote) I Yes I Yes I TBD I Low I TBD �eks Community Center 2,755 TBD TBD Special use Yes No TBD Medium TBD y Svcs Stn #4 (Mt. Willing Rd) 1,200 TBD TBD No leased No TBD Low TBD Soccer Center building 2,520 TBD TBD 7,408 7,063 No TBD Low TBD TBD )pportunity (building) ": indicates if growth can be achieved within the existing building, based on industry standards for square feet per occupant and circulation space )pportunity (site) ": indicates if growth can be achieved on the site of the existing building,. Ily significant ": indicates that a building that is 50 or more years of age. Location ": relative to main transportation systems (public and private), population density, emergency services accessibility, and function of facility. lexibility ": relates to the ease of modifying interior spaces to respond to evolving workplace environments. facility ": relates to the ease with which patrons who visit facilities are accomodated at the location (i.e., a patron of the EAC building who may be hauling a trailer) iagement Services will be working with Inspections staff to verify ADA compliant facilities. with opportunity limited as long as facility remains as special use. leering assessment required to confirm feasibility of vertical expansion. N CAMPUS >enior Center 26,780 22,741 TBD Special use Yes No TBD TBD TBD Human Services Center 28,612 24,045 TBD Yes Yes No TBD Medium TBD ISTREET Franklin Street 7,408 7,063 TBD No No Yes TBD Medium TBD flopment Center 13,232 11,885 TBD Yes No Yes TBD Medium TBD rvices Center 23,500 21,212 TBD No No No TBD Medium TBD to Administration building 9,880 TBD TBD Yes Yes No TBD Medium TBD )pportunity (building) ": indicates if growth can be achieved within the existing building, based on industry standards for square feet per occupant and circulation space )pportunity (site) ": indicates if growth can be achieved on the site of the existing building,. Ily significant ": indicates that a building that is 50 or more years of age. Location ": relative to main transportation systems (public and private), population density, emergency services accessibility, and function of facility. lexibility ": relates to the ease of modifying interior spaces to respond to evolving workplace environments. facility ": relates to the ease with which patrons who visit facilities are accomodated at the location (i.e., a patron of the EAC building who may be hauling a trailer) iagement Services will be working with Inspections staff to verify ADA compliant facilities. with opportunity limited as long as facility remains as special use. leering assessment required to confirm feasibility of vertical expansion.