Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda - 06-05-1995 - VIII-H
i �- O R A N G E C 0 U N T Y BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT Meeting Date June 5, 1995 Action Agenda Item # .J -;4 SUBJECT: STONE KNOLL SUBDIVISION - PRELIMINARY PLAN ACTION BY: July 20, 1995 DEPARTMENT: Planning & Inspections PUBLIC HEARING: Yes X No ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Cameron Resolution of Approval Extension 2580 Application Vicinity Map Cluster Narrative TELEPHONE NUMBERS: Private Road Justification Hillsborough - 732-8181 Staff Analysis of Private Durham - 688-7331 Road Justification Mebane - 227-2031 Fiscal Impact Analysis Chapel Hill - 967-9251/968-4501 5/15/95 Draft Planning Board Minutes Preliminary Plan PURPOSE: Consideration of the Preliminary Plan for Stone Knoll Subdivision. BACKGROUND: The property is located in Chapel Hill Township on the west side of Old NC 86 (SR 1009) southwest of Calvander in the University Lake Watershed portion of the Rural Buffer. The tract is zoned Rural Buffer and University Lake Protected Watershed. Adjacent land uses are agricultural and residential. The total acreage of the tract is 48.86 acres. The proposed subdivision consists of two adjacent lots of record as of 10/2/89. A recent Zoning Ordinance amendment allows the tracts to be combined for development, provided the resultant subdivided lots do not exceed the sum of the number of lots which could be created from each lot of record. When the tracts were surveyed, they were found to contain an additional three (3) acres over the acreage shown on the tax map. The maximum number of lots which could be proposed is fifteen (15) . A cluster subdivision is proposed with fourteen residential lots ranging in size from 1. 18 to 5. 16 acres. Proposed open space consists of 9.83 (21%) acres of common area protecting open fields at the entrance of 2 the subdivision. Because of the elevation, these fields are visually prominent to travellers on Old NC 86. Some of the common area may be used by a neighboring farmer for agriculture. An additional nine (9) acres of open space is proposed to protect streams and steep slopes within a conservation easement on lots 7-13. Each lot will have an individual well and septic system. Lot 11 is proposed as a flag lot due to the location of soils for sewage disposal on lot 14 . Lots 8 and 9 will share a common driveway in order to minimize disturbance. A portion of the existing private road which accesses John's Woods Subdivision (6 lots) will be dedicated public (up to the Stone Knoll boundary) and upgraded to State construction standards. A new public road ending in a cul de sac will be built to access lots 3- 9, 12, and 13. Lot 10 will have access to Old Fayetteville Road (SR 1937) via Russell's Ford Road, an existing Class B private road. The applicant's private road justifica- tion and the Planning Staff's analysis are attached. The private road is justified through clustering, protection of natural features, and the subdivision's location in a protected watershed. In addition, the subdivision will not be visible from Old Fayetteville Road. The Planning Staff recommends that Russell's Ford Road meet Class B private road standards. The Planning Board reviewed the Preliminary Plan for Stone Knoll on May 15 and voted unanimously to recommend approval subject to the conditions contained in the Resolution of Approval. RECOIYMNDATION: The Administration recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan for Stone Knoll Subdivision as per the attached Resolution of Approval. 3 RESOLUTION OF THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Date June 5. 1995 Name of Subdivision STONE KNOLL Owner/Applicant E.R.S.. Inco orated The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves Stone Knoll Subdivision Preliminary Plat, dated 3/21/95 (Revised 3/29/95) and containing 14 lots, including public roads built to State standards and a Class B private road to serve lot 10. All roads shall be irrevocably dedicated to the general public and be constructed to standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. The approval of this resolution authorizes and directs the Orange County Manager to accept for Orange County and on behalf of the public generally, the offer of dedication of John's Woods Road (to the boundary of the subdivision) and Standing Rock Court. This acceptance by Orange County of the dedication to the general public of John's Woods Road and Standing Rock Court shall be without maintenance responsibility. These roads shall be maintained by the owner/applicant until such time as they are accepted for maintenance by the North Carolina Department of Transportation or some other governmental body. Before the Final Plat of Stone Knoll can be recorded: A. Sewage Disposal 1. Each residential lot shall contain an adequate area for septic disposal, and repair area, approved by the Orange County Division of Environmental Health. 2. Disclosure that the septic system location may restrict the size and location of improvements. This disclosure shall be included in a document describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. The document shall also disclose that information regarding the tentative location of septic systems is available from the Orange County Health Department, Division of Environmental Health. 3. Common Area I and Common Area II are of restricted development potential because no site has been identified to accommodate a septic system and these areas are reserved as permanent open space. The restricted lots shall be identified in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final 4 Plat. B. Roads and Access 1. Standing Rock Court and John's Woods Road (up to the subdivision boundary) shall be constructed to standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation, within a 50 and 60-foot right-of-way respectively, and the construction shall be inspected and approved by NCDOT. The joint driveway serving lots 8 and 9 shall be installed. OR A letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond shall be submitted to secure installation of the joint driveway and construction of Standing Rock Court and John's Woods Road to the standards of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. An estimate of the construction cost must be prepared by a certified/licensed engineer or grading contractor and submitted to the Planning and Inspections Department. The financial guarantee must reflect 110% of that estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina. The document describing development restrictions to be recorded with the Final Plat shall state that the financial guarantee will not be released until the road construction has been inspected and approved by NCDOT. 2. Russell's Ford Road shall be inspected, and the construction to Class B private road standards shall be certified in writing to the Orange County Planning Department by a North Carolina Professional Engineer, or a North Carolina Registered Land Surveyor. The location of the travelway within the platted private road right-of-way shall also be certified. OR A letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond shall be submitted to secure construction and inspection of Russell's Ford Road to Class B private road standards. An estimate of the construction and certification costs must be prepared by a certified/licensed engineer or grading contractor and submitted to the Planning and Inspections Department. The financial guarantee must reflect 110% of that estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina. The document describing development restrictions to be recorded with the Final Plat shall state that the financial guarantee will not be released until the road construction has been certified by a North Carolina Professional Engineer or a North Carolina Registered Land Surveyor. 3. An erosion control plan for construction of the roads shall be submitted by the 5 applicant for review and approval by the Orange County Erosion Control Division. 4. A Private Road Maintenance Agreement for Russell's Ford Road shall be submitted to the Planning and Inspections Department and approved by the County Attorney. 5. Lots 1, 2, 11, and 14 shall access onto John's Woods Road. Lot 10 shall access onto Russell's Ford Road. Lots 3-9, 12 and 13 shall access onto Standing Rock Court. These restrictions shall be stated in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 6. Approved street name signs shall be erected at the intersection of streets as required in Section IV-B-3-c-12 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. Evidence shall be submitted by the applicant that the sign is in place or a copy of the receipt for purchase of the sign shall be submitted to the Planning Department. 7. A temporary turnaround shall be provided at the end of the public portion of John's Woods Road and shall be constructed to NCDOT Standards. 8. The right-of-way width on Old NC 86 adjacent to the subdivision shall be labeled as 80 feet. C. Land Use Buffers and Landscaping 1. Landscaping shall be installed or preserved as indicated on the approved landscape plan, and must be inspected and approved by the Planning and Inspections Department. OR The applicant shall secure installation of required landscaping through a letter of credit, escrow agreement, or bond. An estimate of the cost for required plantings and their installation must be provided. The financial guarantee shall reflect 110% of the estimate and be issued by an accredited financial institution licensed to do business in North Carolina. 2. Provisions for protection of existing trees as shown on the approved landscape plan shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 6 3. A Type E Land Use Buffer shall be provided on the Common Areas adjacent to the new right-of-way line for Old NC Highway 86. The buffer shall be 75 feet in width. Planting requirements within the buffer are hereby waived in order to maintain views of the open space and to allow continued farming there. Said buffer shall be so noted on the plat, and described in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. D. Drainage 1. Impervious surface data, as pursuant to Article 6.23 of the Zoning Ordinance shall be included in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 2. A stream buffer shall be provided for a width of 100-107 feet along the intermittent stream crossing lots 9-14. The width of the buffer shall be stated on the face of the plat. Development restrictions within the buffer shall be specified in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 3. Locate additional drainage easements as required following review and approval of the Erosion Control Plan. E. Parkland 1. Cash in the amount of $2,081 (14/35 acre x $5,203/acre) shall be paid to Orange County as payment in lieu of parkland dedication. 2. The entirety of the open space to be shown on the Final Plat shall be irrevocably dedicated to the homeowners association for recreation/open space use by residents of the subdivision. Final Homeowners Association documents and restrictive covenants shall be submitted by the applicant for review and approval by the County Attorney. 3. Submit a plan showing required recreation improvements in accordance with Section IV-B-7-b. F. Miscellaneous 1. The Final Plat shall contain a title block and vicinity map in accordance with Section V-D-2 and V-D-3 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations. 2. The following natural and man-made site features shall be shown on the plat: (Include streams, rivers, ponds, lakes, swamps, marshes, sites in "Inventory", houses, barns, sheds, railroads, overhead utility lines, cemeteries) 7 a. Intermittent streams and drainage ways on lots 7-14. 3. The following easements shall be shown on the plat: a. 100-foot conservation easement on each side of the intermittent stream on lots 9-14; b. 50-foot conservation easement along drainage ways on lots 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, and 14; C. 25-foot private access easement along the rear lot lines of lots 5-8; and d. Shared driveway for lots 8 and 9 from Standing Rock Court to the western boundary of the conservation easement. e. Private access easement for road encroachment on lot 10. 4. A setback of 30 feet shall be maintained as measured from the edge of right-of-way of John's Woods Road, Russell's Ford Road, and Standing Rock Court. Side yards shall be a minimum of 10 feet, and rear yards a minimum of 10 feet except at subdivision boundaries. These setback requirements shall be stated on the plat, and in a document describing development restrictions and requirements to be prepared by Planning Staff and recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 5. A joint driveway shall be provided for lots 8 and 9 extending from Standing Rock Court to the Western boundary of the conservation easement. 6. On lots 5-8, indicate acreage exclusive of the 25 foot private access easement. 7. Pursue negotiations with Triangle Land Conservancy or other qualified public/private entity for dedication of the conservation easement as shown on the Preliminary Plan. Submit final copy of the easement agreement to Orange County for review. Such agreement shall include the following: a. If the easement is dedicated by the current owner, all residents of the subdivision shall be permitted to access the conservation easement consistent with the agreement granted to Triangle Land Conservancy; and b. Orange County shall be designated alternate Grantee in the event Triangle Land Conservancy (or other agency) ceases to exist or no longer desires to hold the conservation easement, or is no longer qualified as Grantee. G. Certifications 1. A Certificate of Survey and Accuracy signed by a registered Land Surveyor shall be notarized on the face of the Final Plat. 8 2. A Certificate of Declaration and Maintenance in the form provided in Section V-D-6-b of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations signed by the landowner and developer shall be on the face of the plat and included in a document describing development restrictions to be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 3. The Division of Environmental Health ',shall certify that each lot contains a suitable area for septic disposal. 4. The North: Carolina Department of Transportation shall certify that Standing Rock Court and John's Woods Road (to subdivision boundary) have been constructed to State standards or that construction plans have been approved. 5. A Certificate of Approval signed by the Orange County Planning and Inspections Department. Signature of Applicant Clerk to the Board I, , accept the above listed conditions of subdivision approval, and acknowledge that each must be met prior to recordation of the final plat. Applicant Date I APPLICATIOPs r'OR PRELIMINARY PLAC APPROVAL 9 MAJOR SUBDIVISION 8/93 ORANGE COUNTY ? CD PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT (INK ONLY) ,L SUBDIVISION NAME: LOCATION: -0q7-E(Gd6ri �F OC�IJBCc fjn/� OWNER/DEVELOPER: -(-T, te-S- (tic -rc)J n y,4,eTe ADDRESS: STF ZOS Il f/C-14_ 57J'k&ZTELEPHONE NO.: Yol 00 ?7 �- irf. I? C .�0Z 7, rC/Y AGENT/CONTACT: a n /c� �-�G TELEPHONE NO.: 154"Zr A. SUMMARY INFORMATION: - ��/U Orange County Tax Map ?—/81ock Lot(s) Township Zoning District(s): tJ /e Er' GQ Total Number of Acres: _ "7 Phases: Oil F Total Number of Lots: Average Lot Size: Z•(fps I Minimum Lot Size: /• /2 C: Number/Type of Structures: (existing) _/70,41- (proposed) Lineal Feet in Streets: r (r0 Acres in Open Space: Water Supply: Public (specify) -- Community Individual Wastewater Disposal: Public (specify) — Community Individual School District: P [ /Z L Fire'District: a9 � General Land Uses in Area: ,9 F. etC&L Tl tZ /�'�ri'Q EGl f -4L Critical Areas: /OCR r�u '-- streamidrainageways j'lONr flood prone areas G F'N watershed (specify) 12 0 f r= historic sites other (explain) Is the property to be subdivided currently under "farm use value taxation'? Yes_ No I If 'yes', please contact the Orange County Tax Office. Subdivision of the property may require payment of deferred taxes under 'farm use value taxation'. B. All plats must be submitted on sheet no smaller than one inch equals two-hundred feet (1'=200') and no larger than one inch equals twenty feet (1'=20') and must contain the following'information: 601� subdivision name (✓ zoning of tract and adjacent. ✓ name & address of owner(s) properties z'::: �"•' name & address of subdivider ✓ z<>.>.:::<•.? building setback lines by notation (if other than owner) or typical tot layout name of surveyor, engineer, "'"`* location and width of existing and C landscape architect or architect, proposed easements (drainage, address, registration *and seal utilities, roads, etc.) cy W ✓ (title) Preliminary Plan existing, D ,.. g, proposed and adjoining x ' scale, north arrow rights-of-way including dimensions N date (including revision dates) and street names and state road cu w ✓ township, tax map-block-lot numbers. Lineal feet of road +� w references centerlines and approximate "� f✓ ' ' N Parent Parcel Identification acreage of new street rights-of- w `� deed book and paps M of property ✓ way to be subdivided ' �� existing and proposed utilities, rq M '�A3':RM boundary described yvlth bearings including type, sizes, hydrants, E S° ✓ and distances valves, manholes M `•% total acreage of the tract and ✓ :. ; existing and proposed curbs, Y acreage of lots, including end gutters and culverts, including U 'D excluding area within rights-of- sizes end grades a) co L L way :'�� location and width of alleys, U cn '� control corner sidewalks, bike lanes, transit systems, and bus stops (please complete reverse side) proposed lot lin, • ith dimensions il street cross-sections and lot & block num• s intwsection details including 10 7;;7 phasing lines design and width of travalway and topography at ton foot (10) shoulders intervals horizontal alignment and general C curve data (public roads) water bodies, streams, floodway and floodplains centerline radius on all proposed rn stream buffers streets 0 location and size of parcels Permanent features such as V) U dedicated for public use, buildings, cemeteries, historic E_ _4 landmarks to t.-4 recreational use or reserved in � 6.4 adjoining lot layout names of common, with purpose noted adjoining property owners. If impervious surface data (if located a) 0 in water supply watershed) subdivided, subdivision plat name. 4J L" plat book & page number, and 0 vicinity map showing general —4 co perimeter lot numbers. CL CU location of subdivision with streets location and size of lots of E " V/ I 0 CC and roads identified by State road restricted development potential U number and name and notation on plat regarding landscaping and buffer a) ce U _0 requirements same .0 = :tormwater detention and/or township, corporate and extra- territorial planning jurisdiction lines retention sites and undisturbed which cross the property areas for infiltration purposes (it located in water supply watershed) C. OTHER SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Twenty-five (25) copiai of the preliminary plat. 2. One full size copy of an Orange County Tax map (With tax parcels involved clearly marked in pencil). 3. Where municipal or OWASA sower is not available, is copy of the Preliminary Plat indicating Health Department soils analysis approval/denial for each lot shown thereon. I 4. Where a private road is proposed a written staternept by the applicant or his/her authorized representative which sets forth the justification for a private road (see Section IV-8-3-d-1 of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations). 5. Auxiliary documents, in draft form, prepared in accordance with Section VL of.this Ordinance which assure completion and/or maintenance of im p rovements required by this Ordinance. Such documents may include, but not be limited to, private road maintenance i!Cr.%^_,,nGnt, and articles of incorporation and restrictive covenants p rtaining to a homeowner's association. These documents may be required as necessary as Ividencs that the ordinance requirements are being met. 8. Fee - $350.00 plus $5.00 par lot (1 fee for preliminary and final plat). 7. If the subdivision contains 10 lots or more the following information shall be submitted with the application: a. Number of years to buildout. b. Number of houses to be built during each year to buildout. C. Average price of houses including lots for each year to buildout. 1, the spplicsn hereby cantify that the foredoing application is complete and accu A I WIN vl�%_ APPLIAns SIG INA"'ILIFIE OWNE G TUR d DATE DATE FEES: Amount 420 • -00 Date Paid Receipt # ;L 1' yflT3 w ,n w` P- MOM ¢ 9V9 •- �� IORAN6E C U N 9-169 CCp�• � ,17 7 \ 64. . to-01 tr-� t9 j 12, 14 oa.s 24 na to M.r 66 1 2 AC. 22 AC f '0 10 4C 09 ® 2! sios 1: \ -13 1w11 � 2 At• IC01 AC 33 � � 474 42AC is ) 3Q 2.2• i / MAP 1061 '�.. (/ r a .9ISAC 1•: so ° !s' 10!•p12w •�'It o �• 0 6,27 of- �3 .e 1 a 1 ' s 2.36 AC, O •Ss 't 1 3 .ISA 1 tr���l ' (" � •1 �(•j r. 1 1 r J MAP 108 A ` s.=1 `J ,�V�b r�� 1 1 1 .s� O (TRIAMGIE ACRESI 10 131 ( � .(Q'� � 144+ 1 1� •Soto I IV 6 yArt ` 1 L ��• 'r \\ V 6me 1 le 3.10 trl�� e4 ge q ny� 333 t sto 1 FU '� *.'°S pC i X 90, 1 7oso 42 1O � ( 1.� SAO \00—'' ��� •OjT IC- 1C t0 ' `I MIT MST 398, 319 1 C1 6.134 AC 0 -,e-. O A 1 1 4 �� `�ti S'•i�''AW S 4.0041G 7.66 At � �f FU so 00 3A, ' ® ® ® a aVect �v WAT ec ` 2o6sa'c' `tti oesss 4p2s _ _ saaC. i 1a SA y,,h�q'a0 ° M�� aY C p t0 yOPI' ah w L•. 10 31 ti �� 37s 3, 0246 S.OIAC. w ® asTa"s 33.6 AC % 5��2 ® fl7S ms M r.04 AC. C ssM y6 T.6 •1w ~ w law )9 39E AC 3 0116 {4 �p� T 1106 � Q stns .26.2 ors � 1 46 2 SS .rigs .. .2io• 301AG SAC. 1. !F 17 SAC `J 1 3,01 AC- •u 7. ; 4003 HR' w 2 Ar 6 �- 146 O •5639 ® ° t / aas a Sa „ .. .•M 6.59 . .. 1 • / ���!►C• so %Is S3 0 loss i asae ,4A •106s , �• ,AC „ �;,� 3 A.. y OI AC• ® - �: T.e9 Ac. 6.47IC• 11 n , C na7 j4 t 1 lie fU ,2364 33^ ti 69.16 AC0 as 3A AC q,pMC %to 46 Z•G' STONE KNOLL SUBDIVISION Zoning: Rural Huffer/University Lake Protected Watershed a p15TRICT JPA Land Use Plan: Rural Buffer/Water Supply Watershed 4 — —= Owner: E.R.S. , Inc. — Te Not to scale '11► �� 1 930C �A L lIONINg C "^ 12 e.ns., inc. T, March 2.1 1995 D Emily Cameron. Planner II ° Orange County P1anning .De.partmen't . Hillsborough . NC RE : Stone Kno11 Cluster Subdivision Narative Please receive the followinjg pre1i-minary plan for Stone Kno.l l., a cluster subdivAs•ion o'ff -Old Hwy . 86., just .southeast . of Calvarider: .and north/northwest of Johri ' s Woods subdivision . The- 48 ..578 .acres of l and . zoned University PW , i nc l ude two• lots of record prior to October 1989 . .Tax map 7- 110-_20 ; 32 : 659 acres -of land allows five .,2 acre lots and four 5 acre lots plus 2 . 669 acres for roads . Tax map 7- 1.12-35 16 . 200 acres o.f . land allows five 2 acre Pots and one 5 acre lot plus •1- : 20 acres for .roads . Tct.al . for both parcel's : ten 2 acre l.ots., five 5 acre lots a.nd 3 . 859 acras. .available for road's . The enclosed .plan pr.opose's a c l us t er subd i v i s'i on of 144i lots with a maximum lot s.ize' df 5 . 168 acres ( lot .10) and 'a m.inimym ' lot• -size of 1 . 180 acres ( lot 1. ) and .an average lot. size of 2 ., 5.99 acres , Approx. i,mat:ely 2 . 367 acres wil l be devoted to oaved public r.odds • which will. eventually be to-ken . over by the stat'e-. By c 1 us.ter I h g 9 . 83.1 7 acres of. common 1 and can be set aside as - perpetual open space .. Th i s.' common land consists of - 75% of th'e� .open hay . fields . along old 86 which• are highly . visible from automobiles traveling . nvrth front .Carrboro . The fields - rise .up to a high, knol.'l with a major- •vie.w. 'to the south e.a-st .. On top of this• knoll•1 is planned a sMal T area of .• •larrdsca.ped rocks end trees for : use . b.y Stone- Knoll residents and their guests . In order to . preserve the f*u1l impact of thi's' vista_ and view , we .acre requesting a -waiver f.or the . land-sc.ap*e buffer along both s'i:des of John ' s . Wo.ods Road from Old Hwy 8.6 to . S-tanding 'R•ock • Court . Approxirhat'e•ly 15 . trees are required on Suite 205 . 125 Kingston Drive • Chapel Hill,NC 27514. 0k.°919.942.0077 •.FAX.'919.942.0015. dential and Light Commercial John D. Hartley, President/Architect•General Contractors NC License X10362 •Design and Construction of Resi t' 13 each side of the 6.00 ' long right-of-wa would berel•ocate.d on. the common land -in such ahwayyasrtos' enhance the view and vista .and create additional screening of, common , land- to- the north . We wduld also like' to -•widen the landscape buffer north of John ' •s Woods Road along old 86 , again to enhance the design concept for the common .land . I. ha.ve spoken .with Robert Hogan Sr , the adjacent -land owner to the south east , who eicpr`essed a desire ,to keep his fields went of' old 86 from Carrboro. town limits to Stone Knoll open and 'pl.anted in hay . In addition.. Robert % H.ogan . Jr . . •and I have drafted a prel imi.nary Letter • of Agreement for his. agricultural * use of this common. area . The . granting of this waiver wou.l,d insure the continued preservation of this west* est vista . from Carrboro town limi-ts . to'- Calvander and allow continued agriculture use . T.hr'e.e. d.i f f-er.-ent means of ' access to Lot 10 were. studied FRussell ' s Ford Road , a .60' -.private drive -off Old ayetteville -Road offer-ed one possibility ; ' a ' 50 ' - easement over Lot 4 or Lot ' S John ' s ' Woo.ds to- John ' s Woods Road of fared a second . The third , wh-ic.h . was - represen.ted on the co nee pt , p1an. was' a - 50 '. easement along the east side. of Lot The access now favored i-s from Russell - Ford Road ( please see private road justification ) Verbal 'agreement has been reached for access along Russell ' s, Ford Road :. At present , •lega 1 . documents ha-ve `been signed by ' 15 of . 21 sigQees with documents mailed t.o out of town owners . Copy of documents are •enclo'sed . . John ' s .Wdbds Road wi11 . rem.ain iri its e-xisting , rig•ht'-of- - way . Two to th.e six property owners do not want " the . right -' of-way .relocated . With. out. their consent ,' relocation- 'Js n*ot . -Possible . A majority, of the l,and.. fa11s . -wi.thin the* University Lake Watershed and is zoned Univ . PW-. A 100- foot stream buffer is -shown where required on -.the preliminary plan-. In ; addition , . -the possibility of a conservation easement is present ly being , r•ev.i e.wed by •the- T.r i angl e' Land Conservancy _ They have made , a visit to" t he • site and w 11 offer•- an opi'n-i'on by April 15th . If the land does not meet their requirements , 'the , easement maybe placed thru the Landowners Association - documents . The 6% impervious sur-face rule appl.ies a** each lot wi 11 tie -sold subject to a 'square foot each on impervious ' surfaces . 14 -Except for lots 1 an•d 2•, al;l are wooded with a mixture, of mature deciduous trees and pine . So.ils are suitable for o•n site ' septi.c systems and individual wells are 'plarrne'd ,. U.t i 1'i t i es w i 1 1 be. underground . and_- prov i ded by Duke Power ' and Southern Bel l• . F'or questions , please conta t John ' Hartley at 942•-0077 . Respkt-f 1y . F } Jo n . D . Hartley exs. inc. 2 "1 Emily Cameron . P.1an.ner Orange County Pla.nning .Depart,ment Hillsborough NC . • . RE :. Stone Knoll Cluster . Subdivision : Russell 's. Ford Road Access Just i f•i cation• Verbal agreement has been reached on access to Lot 10 from Russell ' s Ford Roa.d wi bh .signatures presently being collected - on a recordable agreement . This access is . important to the neifghbori-ng . ' John ' s ' Wo.od.s residents and E . R . S . ,. Inc . for the following . reason : Without Russel 1. ' s'. Ford access , Lot 1O- _wou.ld be accessed over ,an easement ,.on Lots 4 or 5-of John ' s . Woods Subdivision to .Jo-hn ' s Woods Road . a design .. not favored by - John ' s Wood.s r&sident:s due to increased ,tra.f f is & dust. to the-ir neighbor-hood, or By a fifty foot private drive easement along the common boundary of Lot 11 Stone Kno-1-1 a-nd John ' s Woods Lots 5 and 6 : 'thi's would sarrd-wich . Lots 5 and 6 between 2 private drives and,' create additional and unnecessary disturbance in the water shed . It is also . i,mportant for the. owner. s -of ' Sterne Kno l l Lots to- keep t'h.e:i r dr i ves 'as short as poss i b 1 e -s'o as not- to squander their i fnper.v i ous surface- a11ocatiorts on out door space Thank -you for your thoughtful consideration . R c fu J P- n D H rtley Suite.205 125 Kingston Drive • Chapel Hill' NC 27514• Qfc.•919'942.0077 • FAX. 919.942.0015 John D. Hartley,Preside►it/Architect•General Contractors NC License#10362•Design and Construction of Residential and Light Commercial N/F John H. Sowder <00 DB 338 Pg. 114 i ` . Private Easement i r 1 to Contain Encroaching ��'CE55 gravel Driveway , t � 11 tD ' 1 1 5hC F N/ Henry R. Lloyd & Betty Lloyd M 11 1 Se0pe- DB 247 Pg. 1562 Co Lot 1 I I PB 55 Pg. 10 1 Z ai i Y"l�riSE DEC 16004(5 \\ I , T/iEES Z %" -Ipz l- LEEUZZA4_ .- . `, I Nil "Al Aj ---- � ���- -` ►--//o�_ -- � _may_ _ - /Z 't*,(o Lot 4 I I N/F Lynn S. Hillman i I DB 657 Pg. 306 I Lot 2 I liF.S/�JE�ZTIAL_. - I PB 55 Pg. 10 I SLOB I I I — -- ---- L. John' s Woods S PB 32 Pg. 133 • ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 17 306F REVERE ROAD HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27278 STAFF EVALUATION OF PRIVATE ROAD JUSTIFICATION SUBDIVISION: Stone Knoll Subdivision - Preliminary Plan DATE: May 8, 1995 The standards contained in the Subdivision Regulations pertaining to public and private roads are listed below as amended 8/8/94 . The Planning Staff comment regarding each is provided in italics. IV-13-3-d-1. Roads - Public roads are generally required in all subdivisions and will be required where it is found that: 1. The subdivision roads would be accepted by the State for maintenance if: a. They are built in a manner which satis- fies the minimum State design and construction criteria for subdivision roads; and (Russell 's Ford does not meet the State's standard for minimum curve radius.) b. They would satisfy other requirements for addition to the State maintenance system, including, but not limited to, the general density standard of at least two occupied residences for each one-tenth of a mile of subdivision road; or (Russell 's Ford would be considered a Subdivi- sion Access Road and must provide ingress and egress for at least five [5] occupied residen- ces in order to meet the State's density requirement. When lot 10 is developed, there will be eight (8) occupied residences using Russell 's Ford.) 2. The subdivision roads extend existing roads which are public; or (Not applicable.) I � 18 I 3. The subdivision roads are part of a development which is located in an area designated as Urban or Transition on the Orange County Comprehensive Plan; or (The subdivision is not located in a Transition Area as shown on the' Comprehensive Plan.) 4. A proposed road is designated as an arterial or col�ector on an approved Thoroughfare Plan for a municipality or in the Orange County Comprehensive Plan; or (The road is neither On arterial nor a collector.) 5. The subdivision roads are part of a non- residential devellopment consisting of office, retail, industrial, and similar businesses, each located on a separate lot. This provision shall only apply to that portion of a subdivision being developed for non-residential purposes. (Not applicable.) However, private roads may be allowed in a subdivision where, i the judgment of the Planning Board and ith the approval. of the Board of County Com issioners, it is found that the nature and location of the subdivi- sion with respect toI other development and the Comprehensive Plan are such that a private road is justified. I In determining whether to permit private roads in subdivisions, the following design features will be considered: 1. The location and design of the subdivision is such that it clearly preserves the rural character of the 'County through: a. The provision of lot sizes and building setback lines significantly greater than required by ordinance provisions. Compliance with this standard is assured in University Lake Watershed where a subdivision is required tolfprovide a minimum lot size of five acres. Where the minimum required lot size is less than five acres, compliance is assured when each • 19 lot in the subdivision contains at least twice the minimum required lot size; and/or (The proposed subdivision is located in the University Lake Watershed. The lot with access to the private road is five acres in size.) b. The retention and/or provision of landscaping and use of clustering of dwelling units to screen the view of the subdivision from public roads and/or maintain a wooded or forested character, maintain scenic views, or -preserve wildlife, botanical, historic, archaeological and/or recreation sites. (The lot with access to the private road will not be' visible from public roads. A conservation easement is proposed on a portion of the lot to protect the stream and steeper slopes.) 2. The number, location and/or size of lots to be located in the subdivision are such that, even if constructed to State stan- dards, the streets would not be accepted by the State for maintenance due to density or other State requirements; (Russell 's Ford could meet density require- ments.) 3. Recreation and/or open space areas, includ- ing lands containing significant botanical, wildlife, historic and/or archaeological sites, are to be dedicated and/or preserved through restrictive covenants in amounts significantly greater than required by standards for recreation/open space dedication. (A conservation easement is proposed to protect the stream and steeper slopes. Greenway dedication is not required at this location. The subdivision as a whole preserves more open space than is required for a cluster subdivi- sion.) 4. Significantly larger than required stream buffers and lot sizes, and/or other design features are proposed as part of a subdi- vision to be located in a Protected Water- f � 20 shed as designated on the Orange County Comprehensive Plan to reduce the amount of impervious surface and cause infiltration of storm water runoff to prevent the pollution of water supply reservoirs. (This subdivision is located in a the University Lake protected watershed. A private road would create less disturbance and less impervious surface than a public road.) 5. Topographic and environmental features, such as streams, steep slopes, or watersheds, that would be adversely affected by the use of roads constructed to State standards because of factors such as significant amounts of earthwork (cut and fill) that would contribute to increased runoff of stormwater and siltation. (Building the road tolState standards would require grading significantly more area than with the proposed private road. The road is also within 300 feet of a perennial stream.) 6. The site is already developed to 100% of the capacity which could be achieved after approval of the subdivision and some or all of the non-conforming aspects of existing development on the site will be made more conforming as a result of the proposed subdivision, and all conforming aspects of the development will remain conforming. (Not applicable.) 7. There is only one , subdivision road proposed. Its length does not exceed 350 feet. It serves no more than five lots. Its grade does not exceed nine percent. The land being subdivided is not connected to or is part of another subdivision required to be served by public roads. In addition, the average lot size within the subdivision is at least 40,000 square feet. (Not applicable.) i EVALUATION SUNKARY: The proposed p�ivate road is justified through larger lots, protection of �iatural features, and restrictive covenants. In addition the subdivision is located in a protected watershed. whore disturbance and L 21 impervious surface should be minimized. Planning staff recommends that Russell 's Ford be approved as a Class B private road. ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 22 306F REVERE ROAD HILLSBOROUGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27278 V 1F. L•, MEMORA"UM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Emily Cameron, ASLA, Planner II SUBJECT: Land Use Buffer Waiver Request - Stone Knoll DATE: May 8, 1995 This land use buffer waiver request is submitted by E.R.S. , Inc. , applicants for Preliminary Plat approval for Stone Knoll subdivision. The property is located in Chapel Hill Township on the west side of Old NC Highway 86 (SR 1009) south of Calvander. A cluster subdivision is proposed with 14 lots, 9.8 acres of common area, and 9 acres protected in a proposed conservation easement. The common area is located adjacent to the subdivision entrance on Old NC Highway 86. The waiver request is for the planting within a 75-foot Type E Land Use Buffer adjacent to Old 86 on the common area. Section IV-B-8-g of the Subdivision Regulations authorizes the Planning Director to waive additional planting requirements when one or more of the following conditions exists: 1) the topography of a site and/or the size of a proposed lot is sufficient to serve thelpurpose of a buffer; 2 ) existing structures, utilities, gardens or active farmland are located in the buffer or setback areas; or 3) an existing residence or struc�ure with established lawn areas and/or plant beds is contained within a proposed subdivision lot. The facts submitted in support of the waiver request are as follows: r 1. The common area contains 9.8 acres. The portion to be improved for use by the residents is approximate- ly 450 feet from Old 86 and is' at least 20 feet above the road; A 2. The applicant has a prelimina ageement wit the neighboring farmer to allow cu tivation of part of the common area; I 23 3. The common area was planned adjacent to the road to protect the view of the open field rising up to the knoll where the woods begin. The Planning Staff recommends approval of the Land Use Buffer waiver request based on the character and proposed use of the open space, i.e. , to preserve views and allow farming. FINDINGS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING AND 24 INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT PERTAINING TO STONE KNOLL SUBDIVISION CRITERIA FINDIN IV-B-10-b Application Criteria a) The tract is a minimum of 400,000 a) The property is 48.578 acres or square feet for the AR and RB districts. 1,116,057 square feet in size, 200,000 square feet for the R-1 district 1,716,057 square feet larger than the and 80,000 square feet for all other minimum required. districts. y b) Approved water supply and wastewater b) As approved by the Orange County treatment systems are available and Division of Environmental Health, each each lot is served by separate water lot will have an individual well and supply and sewerage connections. ieptic system. c) The total number of lots proposed for c) 48.578 acres gross land area the tract, excluding parcels of reserved .42 . 367 acres in right-of--way recreation/open space, is not greater ------ than the number determined by dividing 46.211 acres net land area the gross land area, excluding public road rights-of-way, by the minimum lot 15 lots maximum (10 Q 2 acres size requirements for the zoning district 5 @ 5 acres) established in the Orange County 14 lots proposed Zoning Ordinance. d) The recreation/open space reserved d) See-comments that follow. within the tract conforms with the recreation and open space standards established in Section IV-B-7-b. IV-B-7-b 2. Dimensional Requirements If the application of the provisions The acreage provided for of Article 5.1.1 (Required recreation/open space is 9.83 acres, Minimum Recreation Space Ratio) which exceeds the amount required by and Article 6.12 (Land Use , the Zoning Ordinance (1.36 acre) and Intensity System) of the Orange by the Subdivision Regulations (0.4 County Zoning Ordinance results in acre). a greater amount of land, then the difference between the application of the standards above and those of Article 5.1.1 and Article 6.12 shall be established as private recreation j for the use of the residents of the M development. I 2 25 3. Site Suitability Land provided or dedicated for passive recreation and open space purposes shall be of a character, slope and location suitable for use for walking, jogging, reading and similar quiet activities, and the preservation of natural features and cultural resources such as steep slopes, rock outcrops, native plant life and wildlife cover, mature woodlands and water resources. Criteria for evaluating the suitability of proposed recreation areas shall include but not be limited to the following: a. LOca ' n. Land dedicated for a. The open space as shown preserves recreation purposes shall be fields rising to a wooded knoll. The located so as to serve the needs open space was planned to protect the of the residents of the vista from Old NC 86. A portion is subdivision and the residents of proposed for agricultural use. It also the immediate neighborhood serves to buffer some of the residential within which the subdivision is lots from Old NC 86, an arterial. The located. Recreation areas shall portion proposed for use by the be located so as to provide residents is on top of the knoll away insofar as possible, reasonable from roads and drainage areas. accessibility to all residents of the subdivision and residents living in the immediate neighborhood. Recreation areas shall be located where land more suited for recreational purposes due to shape, level slopes and/or dry soil conditions is present. Where proposed park sites are shown on the adopted Land Use Plan, and a subdivision contains a portion of the park site, then the recreation area may be located at the edge of the subdivision so that additional land may be added as adjacent land is subdivided. 3 26 b. ni Land dedicated for b. The acreage designated for recreation purposes shall be a recreation/open space is divided by an single parcel except where it is ,existing road; however, both parts will determined that two (2) or more be owned by the Homeowners parcels are suited to the needs Association. of a particular subdivision. The Planning Board may recommend, and the Board of Commissioners may require, the dedication of a connecting path in addition to the land required in Section IV-B-7-b-2 of this y ordinance. Where a connecting path is necessary, a path of up j to fifty (50) feet in width may be required, but in no case shall r the path be less than thirty (30) feet in width. c. Accessibility. Land dedicated c. The recreation/open space has frontage for recreational purposes shall on the existing right-of-way for John's have at least fifty (50) feet of Woods Road. frontage on at least one (1) street within the subdivision. 4. Site Improvements Private recreation facilities, either The recreation/open space is suitable for required or provided at the option passive recreation (walking, nature study of the applicant, shall meet the photography, campfires, etc.) It also standards for improvements: serves as a buffer from Old NC 86. Selective clearing and landscaping are Park bench, picnic tables, grills and proposed to create an area on top of the trash receptacles. knoll for use by the residents. One (1) picnic table per 50 In addition, the applicant is required to residents, 50 sq. ft. of land per make a payment of$2,081.00 in lieu of table. public dedication of recreation/open space which will be used to purchase and/or In addition to land provided or develop parkland for use by the dedicated for active recreation subdivision and neighborhood residents. purposes, sufficient area shall be provided to make available a minimum of five (5) off-street parking spaces for the first two (2) acres of each recreation site and one (1) space for each additional acre thereafter. 4 27 5. Method of Provision or Dedication A greenway dedication is not required at Land dedicated for public this location. The payment in lieu of land recreation area as required by this dedication will be used to purchase and/or Ordinance shall be designated on develop parkland for use by the both the preliminary and final subdivision and neighborhood residents. plat(s) of the subdivision and must be dedicated to an appropriate unit of local government. e. The minimum amount of land reserved Lot sizes have been reduced a total of as recreation/open space shall be the 3.216 acres. 10.01 acres of sum of all reductions in minimum lot recreation/open space are proposed. area as a result of the cluster form of development and/or the minimum recreation/open space required in Section IV-B-7-b, whichever is greater. IV-B-10-c Reductions in Lot and Setback Requirements For lots created as part of a cluster development minimum lot area, lot width and setback requirements specified in Section 4.1.2 may be reduced as follows: a. Minimum lot area requirements may be a. The minimum residential lot size reduced by fifty percent (50%) but shall proposed is 1.18 acre, a 41% reduction be no smaller than 5000 square feet. of the 2-acre lot size required in the Rural Buffer zoning district. b. Minimum lot width requirements may b. The minimum lot width required is 130 be reduced by twenty percent (20%), feet. Lot widths may be reduced to but shall be no less than fifty (50) feet. 104 feet. Lot width is not applicable on the turning circle of the cul-de-sac. c. Minimum front setback requirements c. Front setbacks may be reduced to 30 may be reduced by twenty-five percent feet. (25%) except where the front lot line forms an exterior boundary of the cluster development. d. Minimum rear and side setback d. With the exception of exterior requirements may be reduced to ten subdivision boundaries, side and rear (10) feet except where the rear or side setbacks may be reduced to 10 feet. lot line forms an exterior boundary of the cluster development. i 5 28 IV-B-10-e Approval of Preliminary Plan a. Individual lots, buildings and streets a. An existing road will be used for access shall be designed and situated to and a new road built following the 560 minimize alteration of the natural site contour. Houses will be located away features to be preserved. from steep slopes, drainageways, and most of the open fields. Three lots (have access designed to minimize disturbance. I b. The usability of cluster open/recreation b. The open space is suitable for passive space shall be determined by the size, recreation. shape, topographic and location requirements specified in Section IV-B- 7-b. c. Cluster open space shall include c. It includes open fields creating a irreplaceable natural features such as, significant view, agricultural land, and but not limited to, streams, significant rock outcrops. stands of trees, individual trees of significant size and/or species, uncommon plant communities, wildlife habitats and rock outcroppings. d. Cluster recreation space shall be easily d. The open space is located adjacent to accessible to pedestrians, including the the subdivision entrance road where handicapped. slope gradients are accessible for pedestrians. e. The suitability of cluster open space e. The open space preserved is located intended for scenic value shall be specifically to protect the vista from old determined by its visibility from NC 86, which is heavily travelled. adjoining properties and streets and shall seek to lessen the area devoted to motor vehicle access. f. Diversity and originality in lot layout f. The road and lots are located to shall be encouraged to achieve the best minimize disturbance and make the best possible relationship between the land use of soils for sewage disposal. The and the development. conservation easement provides additional protection to steeper slopes Viand the intermittent stream. g. Up to one-fourth of the land with g. i tniothste of the steeper slopes are included slopes greater than fifteen percent conservation easement, which (15%) may be removed or altered only ll remain undisturbed, except for the when such slopes are small and isolated joint driveway for lots 8 and 9. and do not otherwise adversely affect 6 29 h. At least twenty percent of the gross h. 9.83 acres (21%) is designated as land area is designated as common common open space. Approximately open space. No more than fifty percent 6.53 acres may be used for agriculture. (50%) of the required common open space shall be used exclusively for sewage treatment systems, utilities, or other uses which prohibit access by the residents of the cluster subdivision. This restriction does not apply to areas of historic or natural significance which may be protected by access restrictions. 30 FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR STONE KNOLL (CLUSTER) SUBDIVISION RESIDENTIAL SERVICE STA2 DARD APPROACH r- 17 _ Prepared by, The Orange County Planning Department April, 1995 I PROJECT DESCRIPTION Stone Knoll Subdivision is a proposed 14-lot majoir (cluster) subdivision located in Chapel Hill Township on the west side of Old N.C. Highway 86 southwest of Calvander. The total area of the subdivision is approximately 49 acres, and the current zo is RB - Rural Buffer and University Lake Protected Watershed.The average lot size is approximately 2.60 acres.All lots will be served by individual wells and septic tanks,and public roads.Approximately 9.8 acres is to be set aside as common open space. For Stoney Knoll, project build-out is estimated at five years. Housing units will be constructed, beginning in 1996, with completion of the project scheduled for 2000. Units will consist of detached single-family homes, and the applicant estimates the average sales price to be$250,000,including the lot. METHODOLOGY Fiscal impact analysis is a projection of the direct, current, public costs and revenues associated with residential and non residential growth in the jurisdiction in which the growth is taking place. Fiscal impact analysis considers only direct impact in that it projects only the primary costs that will be incurred and the immediate revenues that will be generated. It calculates the financial effect of a planned development or new subdivision by considering the current costs and revenues such a development would generate if it were completed and occupied today.Fiscal impact analysis does not consider the private costs of public action. It is concerned only with public (governmental) costs and revenues. The method used in preparing the fiscal impact analysis is the Service Standard Approach. While only gross expenditures by service category are derived fromi the Per Capita Method,the Service Standard method determines the total number of additional employees by service function that will be required as a result of growth. This method employs average county government costs per person, average school costs per pupil, an employee to population ratio, and average operating expenses per employee for each service category and school district. The number of new employees are projected and multiplied times the average operating expenses(includes personnel,operating and capital costs)per employee. These average costs are then weighed against per capita and per pupil revenues to project the total net fiscal impact of the development. i i 31 TABLE OF CONTENTS SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH PROJECT FISCAL EVIPACT ANALYSIS Section 1 - Project Data Project Name, Township, School District Beginning Year, Ending Year, Inflation Characteristics of Households Construction Schedule/Cost Data Section 2 - Local Government and School District Data Budget Year Per Capita Revenues Per Capita Expenditures Per Student Expenditures School District Per Employee Expenditures Employees Per 1000 Population County Per Employee Expenditure Other Data Other Model Constants School District Data Section 3 - Demographic Projections Based On Project Data Total Housing Total Population School Children Additional County Employees Total School District Additional Employees Section 4 - Projected Net Fiscal Impact on County Tax Base Revenues Expenditures Net Fiscal Impact Section b - Projected Net Fiscal Impact on School District Revenues Expenditures Net Fiscal Impact Section 6 - Summary of Projected Impacts Additional Housing Additional Population Additional School Children Tax Base County Government Balance School District Balance Total Net Fiscal Impact EXPI.ANATION OF TERMS AND DATA SOURCES 32 EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND DATA SOURCES SECTION 1 - PROJECT DATA Project data includes information about the specific development project. Much, if not all, of the information is supplied by the applicant. Data inputs include: Project Name: Name of the project. Township: Township in which the project is located. School District: School district in which the project is located. Beginning Year: The first year of the project in which dwelling units are completed and occupied Ending Year: The last year in which dwelling units are completed and occupied. The template is set to calculate fiscal impacts for a ten-year period Inflation Rate: Unless an inflation rate is entered, the template will calculate fiscal impacts based on constant dollars. Since the inflation rate changes frequently, the Finance Department must be contacted for the most recent figure. Persons/Household:The estimated average number of persons/household(dwelling unit) based on 1990 Census data for the township in which the project is located This information is supplied by the Planning Department and will be updated as necessary using population projections and building permit data. Children/Household. The estimated average number of school age children/household (dwelling unit) based on 1990 Census data for the township in which the project is located This information is supplied by the Planning Department and will be updated as necessary using school membership data. %Non-Elderly:N.C.General Statutes permit an$11,000 exemption to the elderly and disabled who meet certain income criteria. In the event that elderly units are part of the project, the percentage of eligible non-elderly units is entered The tax base will automatically be adjusted to reflect the exemption. Number of Homes: The number of dwelling units to be constructed in the project in each year. Average Sales Price:The average sales price of all dwelling units based on the number and sales price of dwelling unit types to be constructed in each year. s 33 SECTION 2 - LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA Local government data includes information regarding expenditures required to provide County services and revenues received based on the approved Orange County budget for the fiscal year in which the project is considered for approval.All information derived from the approved budget remains constant throughout a fiscal year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of a new budget. Local government revenue and expenditure information is compiled on a per capita (per person) basis.Per capita figures are derived by dividing the total expenditures for a particular service function or revenue source by the estimated population of Orange County for the year in which the project is considered for approval. Populations estimates are prepared by the Planning Department. Data inputs include the following- Budget Year- The current fiscal year; i.e., 1994-95. Per Capita Revenues: The sources of revenue by major category are as follows: Taxes-Other Than Property:Revenues from taxes other than property taxes include those from sales and use taxes, franchise taxes, and animal taxes. Intergovernmental Aid: Revenues from this source, in the form of categorical aid or shared-tax revenues, are provided through State and federal assistance programs. Service Charges: Service (or user) charges support numerous functions and are charged to those who voluntarily receive governmental services or use governmental facilities. Miscellaneous:Miscellaneous revenues include interest earnings on investments,proceeds from license and permit fees, and all other revenues. Per Capita Expenditures: Expenditures by major category are as follows: General Government: Services related to the legislative, administrative, financial, and legal functions of government. Public Safety: Law enforcement services and emergency medical services. Public Works: Efforts related to the maintenance of County-owned property and the provision of sanitation (solid waste disposal) services. Human Services: Departments responsible for the provision of health, social, and recreation-related services. Education:Orange County supports two school units,the Orange County school system and the Chapel Hill\Carrboro school system. This category includes appropriations made to the designated school system for Recurring Capital items. Recurring Capital funds are used for general maintenance,purchase of new equipment/furnishings and vehicle maintenance. Non-Departmental: Contributions to agencies providing cultural and social services outside the formal structure of county government. Other expenditures include equipment replacement and contingency funds. Although there are no employees generated by this category,it has been included as an operating expenditure. It will be included in Section 4,"Total Annual County Expenditure." These expenditures will be calculated on a per capita basis as opposed to a per employee basis. 34 Per Student Expenditures:Information regarding expenditures required to provide educational services and revenues received are based on the approved school System budgets for the fiscal year in which the project is considered for.approval. All information derived from the approved budgets remains constant throughout a fiscal year (July-June) and is changed only with the approval of new budgets. Expenditure information is compiled on a per student basis for County Government Current Expense, School District and State appropriations. County Government Current Expense funds are used for general operation purposes including Instruction and Support Services. Federal revenues and expenditures and other local revenues such as Fund Balance have not been included since they are not directly growth related. Per student figures are derived by dividing the total appropriation for educational purposes from a particular source by the estimated number of students to be enrolled in the applicable school system for the year in which the project is considered for approval. i Student enrollments are obtained from the approved school system budgets. County Government: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations to the school systems by Orange County for Current Expense. The minimum level of per student appropriation is determined by the State Board of Education. School District:Expenditures in this category are unique to the Chapel Hill-Carrboro school system and are based on the level of expenditures possible through assessment of a supplementary school tax. State: Expenditures in this category are based on appropriations from the State Board of Education. School District Per Employee Expenditure: Expenditures per employee based on County, School District and State appropriations, and the total number of school district employees. Employees Per 1000 Population: The number of employees in a particular service category per 1000 population. County Per Employee Expenditure: The average operating and capital expenses per employee in a particular service category. Total expenses in each category includes personnel,operating and capital costs. Other Data: County Government Tax Rate: The County tax rate per $100 of assessed valuation. Since the per capita method focuses only on operating expenditures,the tax rate is reduced by an amount equal to the debt service payments from property taxes for capital projects. School District Tax Rate:The supplementary tax assessed on behalf of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro school system. Assessment Ratio:The ratio of market(sales)value to assessed value based on information supplied by the Tax Office. The assessment ratio is used to convert market value to assessed value for the purpose of computing the tax base. Other Model Constants Elderly Exemption:For projects developed partially or exclusively for elderly(66 and older)or disabled individuals whose annual income does not exceed$12,000, �n$11,000 tax exemption is used in projecting the tax base. School District Employees Per Student: The number, of employees per student in a specific school district. 35 SECTION 3 - DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA Demographic projections provide information about the number of new residents and school children anticipated in Orange County resulting from project development.Projections also provide the number of additional employees required per service function and school district as a result of the new development. Total Housing Units: The cumulative total of new housing units added each year by project development. Total Population:The total population added each year by a project derived by multiplying the number of homes to be constructed by the number of persons per household (see Section 1). School Population: The total number of school children added each year by a project derived by multiplying the number of homes constructed by the number of children per household (see Section 1). Additional County Employees: The number of additional employees required per service category based on project development. Total: Total of all additional county employees required based on project development. School District Additional Employees: The number of additional employees required per school district based on the project development. SECTION 4 - PROJECTED NET FISCAL IIViPACT ON COUNTY Tax Base:The tax base represents the increase in assessed property value expected each year resulting from project development.The values shown are in$1,000's and are derived from a formula which includes the number and sales price of homes, and the assessment ratio. Where applicable, the percentage of non-elderly units and elderly exemption are also used. Revenues:All revenues are derived from a formula which multiplies the per capita revenues(Section 2) times the projected population(Section 3).The exception to this is the property tax which multiplies the tax base times the county government tax rate. Expenditures: All expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies the per employee expenditure (Section 2) times the number of additional employees (Section 3). Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures and projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that it costs Orange County more to provide services to a project than it receives in revenues.A positive net balance indicates that more revenues are received than it costs to serve a project. Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset negative balances in another. 36 SECTION 5 -PROJECTED NET FISCAL IMPACT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT Revenues: The County contribution is derived by transferring education expenditures by County government(Section 4).Revenues derived from the school district tax are derived by multiplying the school district tax times the tax base. State revenues are derived by multiplying the per student expenditure figure times the total projected number of school children (Section 3). Expenditures: Expenditures are derived from a formula which multiplies each per student expenditure (Section 2) times the total projected number of school children (Section 3) and adding the results. Net Fiscal Impact: The net balance is the difference between projected expenditures and projected revenues. A negative net balance indicates that,it costs the school system more to provide educational services for children in a project than it receives in revenues.A positive net balance indicates that more revenues are received than it costs to serve a project.Positive net balances in one project may thus be used to offset negative balances in another. SECTION 6 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED IIVIPACTS SECTION 7 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPACITY M PACTS I l I RESIDENTIALFISCAL IMPACT TEMPLATE: SERVICE STANDARD METHOD 37 Bureau of Economic& Business Research — University of Florida Modified 3/15/95 — Orange County,NC Planning Department SECTION 1 — PROJECT DATA: ENTER THE FOLLOWING DATA FOR EACH PROJECT: PROJECT: Stone Knoll Subdivision. TOWNSHIP: Chapel Hill CONSTRUCTION PERIOD: Be ' - guunng:Year: . .: 1996. Ending Year: 2000 Inflation Rate: 2.9Q%a CHARACTERISTICS OF HOUSEHOLDS: ersvns. cruse:` ::::::2.22 Children/House: 0.29 %Noa- Elderly:::: 10000% HOME SALES DATA: Average Distribution Number of Sales Price of Units :.:... ... ... Year Homes S by Year 1996 1997 3 250000 21.43% 1998'.:<. .... : :;:<` ` «: :. .:<>> _:.:.....:.....::. ,:.::.:;. .... 3 :..;.::...::.:..;. 250000 : 21'. 1999 3 250000 21.43% ..., .:... ..:.:.:;;. :.::;>:. ::;;>::;;::,.;;.;:.14.29%a 2001 0 0 0.000/0 »2002:::::. .... : >:>::; : ': ... <>>>: 2003 0 0 0.000/0 ... ..... .... 2005 0 0 0.000/0 SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: ENTER-1"IN( )BESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT IN WHICH PROJECT IS TO BE LOCATED TO GENERATE STUDENT DISTRIBUTION BY SCHOOL TYPE. School District: School Attendance: Ora a ,:: :: . zmtY° ; >:..:; ;;::<>.:>><>..<.::: tl::..:.:.;';<::::;;:..: `Ekmen . ScI►ool...: ` :>:::..:...:::; . .:48% Middle School 24% Cha I:x]11—c riovta: SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN/HOUSEHOLD: ENTER NUMBER OF UNITS BY HOUSING TYPE TO GENERATE NUMBER OF SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN. Children School Age Housing a Units Per House Children ..... ............ ................ ........................ .. ....... ... ... ................ Du p le x[Mplex/Quadplex 0 0 0 ;;;;:;;;:<:.<.;:.;;:<;:.:::.;:.:::;:;:;>::.:::...... :.:...: ::::.:::..;;;:<.. :.:::::.::; 4..:: «:<;«:.:0. 0 Town House 0 0 0 otals " „', <: <: :> -.: 14 Q2S>''>;: : ;.:: : 4 SECTION 2 — LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA 38 BUDGT:YEAR: — < 1994 95 COUNTY POPULATION: 102894 SCHOOL DISTRICT'STUDENT POPULATION: 7580 COUNTY EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER CAPITA General Government. . 11008 0.0011 Public Safety 138.75 0.0013 Public Works .. 50.00 0.0005 Human Services j 25338 0.0025 Education School District 936.41. 0.0091 SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT: POSITIONS PER STUDENT Total :: ;... . ;::: ::.. 936.41 0.1235 COUNTY PER CAPITA REVENUES $): REVENUES PER CAPITA Taxes -:.Other.Than Pro r :. 4387997: ::::::;: 42.65 .: ..:::::.::.::..:..::::.:.:.:......... Intergovernmental 9053572 87.99 .. .. Service;:Chai es:: : `•::::: .: . ..:..:: : :.26.39 Miscellaneous 1089416 10.59 COUNTY PER CAPITA EXPENDITURES $ : EXPENDITURES PER CAPITA '.:;;General Government: »:::: -: : -:.:653V10::.:.,: ... .. .. ... . ..: . . .. . . 63.49 Public Safety 6350477 61.72 ; -2-39666 26.63 ........... ..... . ....::.:..... ..............:..::.:..::.......... ....... . Human Services 16618148 16151 Educe 750000. 4R ..... g...... Itt...) . _ ..:::::....:..:. ,..... . .::.: . .: ....:.:,.......::..:::...... .:7:29, Non—Departmental 2787882 27.09 COUNTY PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURE $ : EXPENDITURES PER EMPLOYEE Government::: _ . . 6532t1t>;:.:.:::<:: :; .5937$1, Public_Safety 6350477 4576920 `: 4793 bltG Wn 5 32 rks..>:: ....2739.666 Human Services 16618148 65587.17 «.; Educe lion Reeumn :£a 750000 ;: 80093 SCHOOL DISTRICT PER STUDENT EXPENDITURES EXPENDrrURES PER STUDENT Coun G ORelnmelkt< School District 4653911 61397 e:. . .. ... 22856567 ..;:::'?:: • .3015.38 SCHOOL DISTRICT PER EMPLOYEE EXPENDITURES S : EXPENDrrURES PER EMPLOYEE : °1I745r17 School District 4653911 4969.95 .... . .. ................. ,-...;»:>::>:>.;.:.. TAX DATA: ENTER APPLICABLE ASSESSMENT RATIO ELDERLY EXEMPTION: uu. : e:. > ty Tea)ta; ;( ):.:>.>:,:::;: :: ::>:«>::,>::::: 0.'Z* ::::::;.Per.:SItlO Assessed:Valttatmn....... . ... ....::.. :.:::.:....:.:..:.........::.. : .::...::. ... ... School District Tax Rate ($) 0.1544 Per$100 Assessed Valuation .:..:....::. ..:..:...:..:.:.::::::.:: patio :::::...;... -::.. .<::. :;3:>;: 100.0(3«:. .:....w.:::::.::;:: Elderly Exemption 0 $11,000 Where Applicable I 39 SECTION 3 — DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PROJECT DATA YEAR 1996 1997 1998: 2000 HOUSING UNITS 3' 6 g 14 POPULATION 7 13 20 27 31 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 2 2 Middle 0 0 1 1 1 High School p p TOTAL 1, 2 3 3 4 COUNTY GOVERNMENT ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES General Government '':.::.:,OA 0.0 ';::.0 Q 0.0 .:.: .<. .. . ::< 0.0 Public Safety 0.0 AA 0.0 Q 0 Public Works ::: :4A:. 0.0 flA . .0.0 Human Services " O:EI 0.0 TOTAL SCHOOL DISTRICT EI_ ADD ITIONAL EMPLOYEES YEAR 2001:: 2002 2003.; 2004 2005; HOUSING UNITS 14.` 14 14::. 14 14 POPULATION '.31. ':< : 31 : 31 32 SCHOOL OL CHILDREN Elementary m nta rY 2 2 . .:> . .. ..........:.:.. Middle ... High .. ... ..... School >>:,;:<: .: TOTAL ;4.: 4:>::::::;:::»::::::::;: < 4 COUNTY LINTY GO VERNME NT ADD ON 1TI AL EMPLOYEES General Government oe rnment f:Q: 0.0 Public Safety Pub . 4 A 0.0 :!`: :: ::;' _is<:. off Public he W or ks 0 0. Human Services 1 0.1. TOTAL SCHOOL OL D IS I TR CT 0 0.3 0 AD DITION AL EMPLOYEES SECTION 4 — PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON COUNTY GOVERNMENT 40 YEAR 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 I . TAX BASE(S 1000) 750 152 2316 3133 3724 REVENUES (S) Property Tax 5595 11352 17276 23372 27780 Other Taxes 284 585' 902 1238 1486 Intergovernmental 586 1206 1861 2554 3066 Service Charges 176 362 558' 766 919 Miscellaneous 71. 145 .. 224 307 369 TOTAL (S) °'::.__6711: 1365q 20822: 28237 ;33621 EXPENDITURES(S) General Government 423; 8701 1343 1843 Public Safety 411: 8461 1306: 1791 2151 Public Works »»'177 365 563 77 -..:.: >«: ;.: 3 ::.928 Human Services 11076. 2214. ::::::. '. :. 3417: 4688 5628 Education 2698 41 64: 5713 Non—Departmental 180:. 371 573 786 TOTAL (S) 3578.: 7364 `::11366 15595 `':_ :>.18721 NET FISCAL IMPACTS 6286 9456 12643 14899 2001 2002 :'::. 2003 2004 :;`:>::: ::::.: 20.05 AX BASE($1000) 3832 3943 ; .4057: .: :;.4296 REVENUES NUE S $ Property Tax 28586: 29415 ;30268;: 31146 :::: :::>: ;:32049 .:::.......:....:::.::. Other Taxes 7 ' 1619.:: >> : _> r ":> : <1714 Intergovernmental 3246 ::'3341;: 3437 Service Charges 974 1031 .: 10.61_ Miscellaneous 391 402 414.; :;:::';'.»:;>::>:<s;_:'426. TOTAL $ 596: 35599 ::.. `< : :.36631: 37694 :< <><`:"':>:<: ; 38787 EXPENDITURES S S Ge neral Government rnment Public Safety 2213.': 2277 2411 ::`r:':::: 2343 :...._2981: Public Works or ks S5. 982 >::>::::::`:`` >: 040 <>:'::';:: <>>: _10,70. _. Human Services 9T~.. 5959 ...... Education .:..;::..:::. > ><:<>:>::>,:::::.::::: ..:......:.....::.:.:.::::... . . <:::.::::::::::::;;::. 8 7262 .:::....: ::: >:::;:;:::7473 7690 » ::::::::`::::::::::::`:':::7913 105. :: :. :Non—De P artmental . 1000 :. " .19': 18< ": `089 TOTAL S 19 823':'.: :. 9 ': 20989 . NET FISCAL IMPACTS 15332 15776 :' .`:`: 16234;° 16704 i 41 SECTION 5 — PROJECTED FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT YEAR 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 REVENUES (S) County 1311. 2698 ...4164 5713 . : 6859 School District 1158 2350 3576 4837 5750 State 2623 5399 8333 11433 13726 TOTAL (S) 5092. 10446 . 16073 21984 26334 EXPENDITURES (S) County 1311: 2698 . 4164 5713 -:... 6859 School District 534 1099 .1697 2328 2795 State ;.: 2623.. 5399 8333 11433 13726 TOTAL (S) 4468: 9196 . 14194; 19474 23379 NET FISCAL IMPACTS 624 1250 1879_: 2509 YEAR 2001' 2002 2003 2004 2005 REVENUES (S) County 7058 7262 7473- 7690 School District 591,6::: 6 088 . >';16 . 6446 6633 >::..... ..:.:.::.::.. . State . 14124:, 14533 15388 .: ;::.::::::: .1.5835 TOTAL (S) 27098: 27883 28692:;: 29524 .. `?., ,30380 EXPENDITURES S County 7262 :. <.7473: 76% :: :.<::.:: :_7913. School District 2876:. 2959 -. r::3045. 3133 :,.:. :.:. State >>I4124 14533 TOTAL (S) ;::'::24057:. 24755 :>.. 254' 2: 26211 26971 . ,. . : 322 :NET F IS CAL I MPA CT 3129 3313 SECTION 6 — SUMMARY OF PROJECTED DEMOGRAPHIC/FISCALIMPACTS 42 YEAR 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 .. HOUSING uNrrs 3 6 9 12 14 POPULATION 7. 13 20 27 31 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary 0 1 L. 2 2 Middle 0 0 1 1 1 High School 0 0 1 1 1 TOTAL 1 2 3. 3 4 COUNTY EMPLOYEES 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 '. 0.2 SCHOOL EMPLOYEES 0,1. 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 750 - ( ) 2316. 3133 3724 TAX BASE 51000 ... 1522 COUNTY BUDGET(Z) Revenues 6712 13650 20822: 28237 33621 Expenditures 3578 7364 11366 15595 ` -18721 BALANCE 3133 62861 9456 12643 :::::,'.:: ;:;.>`:.14899 SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET Revenues ><5092`:: 10446 16075. 21984 :: 26334 Expenditures 4468. 9196 ' 1494 19474 BALANCE :- 624:: 1250 1879 2509 :. ;: ' 2955 COMBINED BUDGETS(S) Revenues ``11844. 2409E :... . . 36895:< 50221 :. ......:59955 Expenditures 8047 165601 25560: 35069 42100 : BALANCE 3757 7536 . 11335 15152 . 4. 17854 YEAR »:2A01.: 2002 `::. 2003 2004 : :. 2005 HOUSING UNITS `:.a4:. POPULATION ION SCHOOL OL CH II.DREN Elementary ..::..;.:.;:::.::..:.: .:::..:.::...... ..: Middle 1 : .......... High School TOTAL ',.. 4 COUNTY EMPLOYEES Q.Z::: 0.2 :;.:: ::<::; .:::Q.Z:: 0.2 SCHOOL EMPLOYEES 0,3 0.3 0.3 0.3 ::':: :`: ::.; TAX BASE($1000) 3832. 3943 .:.: .:.:; ..:: .;.405 ..: 4175 :--:* COUNTY BUDGET Revenues .::'.34596. 35599, .... :; ::::;:::::36631: 37694 ' ;. .;:.''''::;::::;638787 Expenditures >:a9264 19823 :'. ::`::;'. ".24398' 20989 ; 21598 BALANCE LS332:. 15776 ...<:.<:: 6 16704 :.::::: < ' 7189 SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET s Revenues [ 4' :;'!: `: ......... .. :......1::.: 27883 ;:28592;'' 2952 30380 Expenditures 2405 :: ape 7 2475$ ::' »25472' 26211 : ;....'':26971., BALANCE :30.41::: 31291 .::`';: ::: '>:' 20' 3313 COMBINED INED BUDGETS s O . .::::..::::..:.::::.:..:.: :..:.. Revenues %>.:.61693: 63482 ::::: ::`::: ;::::65323. 67218 ...'....,.. .:;:: ::.69167 Expenditures : ''<::4W21` 44571 :' ** ;; ::45V-0-: 47200 ": 4$569 BALANCE 18372.:: 18905:`-': 19453. 20017 ': :c`.'::::`. :;:..20598. SECTION 7 - SUMMARY OF PROJECTED PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPACITY IMPACTS 43 SCHOOL DISTRICT DATA: ENTER"1"IN( )BESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT IN WHICH PROJECT IS TO BE LOCATED TO GENERATE STUDENT DISTRIBUTION BY SCHOOL TYPE. School District: School Attendance: Orange County ::::::' :: ... 0 ) :. Elementary School 48% Middle School 24%a Cha el Hill—Cwboro 1. High School 28% YEAR 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 SCHOOL CHILDREN Elementary p 1 a 2 2 Middle - 0 p High School 0:' 0 TOTAL j 2 _ 3 4 YEAR 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 SCHOOL CHILDREN . . .....:: Elementary 2: 2 2 2 <>: ;:::: <:':.. 2 Middle High School i. TOTAL SCHOOL CAPACITIES-ALL SCHOOLS CURRENT ENROLLMENT -ALL SCHOOLS 3662. Middle 1972 Middle 1851 Hi Schoc3 1..: 1680 : .High&bo©i.::: 2]56 TOTAL 6994 TOTAL 7669 YEAR 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 OJEC,TED ENROLLMENT Elementary n tart > >> 3662:: 3663 >:: >: ;: > .:..::.:.....>. 3663 3664 ::...... Middle 1851 ::;>::: I852: 1852 1$52 . 2]5T 2 156 Hi 8h Sc hool 15 6 2157 :i..* <> 2157. TOTAL 76M 7671 `7672: 7672 ':::«: ::'7673 YEAR 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT Elementary 3664: y 3664 3664:: 3664 Middle 8 .` 185-2 85 ::: ».> :::;..�..2. 1852 :: ;:1852' Hi gh School 2157 :`.>:~:'> ,;>>` : ;. ;.:. ,.217 2157 >: :`':>>:::2157. TOTAL >: ?fx?3: 7673 ...: ::: .; :::::::7673: 7673 .:: ::; `:°`7673 44 HOUSEHOLD OCCUPANCY CHARACTERISTICS FOR ORANGE COUNTY,NC BY TOWNSHIP P):.. (4) (5) Children Children School.Age, School Age Number.: Persons . Persons Uadr 18 Under 18 Children. Children of In : Per. : . Iii Per:. In Per Township Households Households .:Household: Households Household Households Household 1990 CENSUS Bingham : : ::::: 2.1s6 5177 2.40.: 1122 . . 0.52 721...: 033 Cedar Grove 1345 3676 2.73 865 0.64 624 0.46 0.42 :::'. :.: . `6980:. 0:29 Cheeks 2036 5422 2.66 1340 0.66 999 0.49 ... '' ::::..:::: :..?A3? ..... : . 5245:.: 2.57 :. 1285 ..:0.63 896_ 0,44. Hillsborough 3811 9816 2.58 2567 0.67 1777 0.47 Little River:. ;..:'T77: : 2183 ::: :21 580: 0:75 052 Orange County 36104 84627 2.34 17698 0.49 12399 0.34 1980 CENSUS Bin h . .. .3954::. 2,38. 1021 Q.62 ... ..... N/A 0.56 Cedar Grove 1176 3166 2.69 919 0.78 N/A 0.66 C.hpel Hiil 50572 . 2:72 39 .... 8 045:: :N/A*:::-:: ....... 0.67 Cheeks 1693 4821 2.85 1466 0.87 N/A 0.70 -. .f: '. ii:.... Eno: 7 ;. :.:. 17a. 94so...... . . . 2 23a . . 0.69 :: :<... . fi/. :.:.::.:.:. ... . 0.62 Hillsborough 3233 .8599 2.66 2421 0.75 N/A 0.65 Little River::::: ::::' ::: .: ?: . .>;<:;: 0.77 ::::::::::.NIA... 0.64 Orange County 28707 77055 2.68 15879 0.55 N/A N/A NOTES: (1)Number of households included under 1980 Census dataa is number of housing units. (2)Persons in households included 1980 Census data includes population in households as well as group quarters. (3)Number of children under 18 yews of age includes children living in group quarters due to lack of breakdown by household in available Census data. (4)Data not available from 1980 Census. (5)1980 data calculated using demographic multipliers from "The New Practitioner's Guide to Fiscal Impact Analysis'by Burcheil,Uxtokin,and Dolphin. 1 I NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES- FY 1994-95 ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET 45 1994 ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION 102894 PERMANENT FTE % OF % OF POSITIONS FUNCTION POSITIONS SUBTOTAL TOTAL PER CAPITA GENERAL GOVERNMENT Commissioners 3.225 :. 2.93% 0.15% : 0.00003 Courts WA 0.00% 0.00% 0.00000 >. Elections 3.500 . . 3.18% 0.00003 Mans er. g 8.000 727% 0.38% 0.00008 Personnel 7.000:... 6.36%.: 0.33% :: .. 0.00007 Budget 3.000 2.73% 0.14% 0.00003 - : Finance ;; .: .. 5.(=: .:: .. 454% 0.2496 0.00005. Purchasing 3.000 2.73% 0.14% 0.0:0003 raC : ;.:Data Peaein9 `.5:800... 5.09% 0.27% ". 0.0 Central Sewices 3.000 2.73% 0.14% 0.00003 Rk sv of Qeads.:..: 14,250 13.40% 0:70%`::; . ;: .:,,.:0.00014 Tax Assessor 18.000 16.35% 0.85% 0.00017 7.000..: 6.3ti96 o.3a% 40007 Tax Collector 6.000 5.45% 0.28% 0.00006 Planning&Inspections 23.000 1.0996 " 000022 SUBTOTAL 110.075 100.00% 5.22% 0.00107 PUBLIC SAFETY >�. 250 :_: s5.05%. a 2696:: 000066 Domestic Violence 1.000 0.72% 0.05% 0.00001 mergencySenAcos 000046: SUBTOTAL 138.750 100.00% 6.58% 0.00135 PUBLIC WORKS Other.. WA 0.00% 0.00% 0.00000 x: . Sanitation 17.000 34.00% 0.81% 0.00017 SUBTOTAL 50.000 100.00% 2.37% 0.00049 HUMAN SERVICES Soli&W 4 ::;..:.: t.5896. ..:..':;;::::.::0:1.996.. O:00004 . .. . Economic Development 3.000 1.18% 0.14% 0.00003 i ::.>:>r>:::;:;;;c :t09300.., Health 72.075 28.45% 3.42% 0.00070 uttural,F)dension,.:.:::. .. :.:...... -. 75D.::::::..;:.::: 385%. : . 46...... Recreation& Parks 11.750 4.64% 0.56% 0.00011 1:0600 .:.:..:.::......:. » : a000l.o. CAT 11.250 4.44% 0.53% 0.00011 Commission for lAfcmers. 2750... 1: ..:.. . .09%:. _... ..,0.13%:: ;:_; Library 9.100 3.59% 0.43% 0.00009 Child Su Dport; -10.000 : 3.95% _ 04796;.,<>>::::::: SUBTOTAL 253375' 100.00% 12.02% 0.00246 46 NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES- FY 1994-95 ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET (CONTINUED) 1994 ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION 102894 PERMANENT FTE % OF % OF POSITIONS FUNCTION POSITIONS SUBTOTAL TOTAL PER CAPITA EDUCATION 0mnge.0ounty: 619.000 39.80% .. 29.37% 0.00602 Chapel Hip 936.410 60.20% 44.43% 0.00910 SUBTOTAL 1555.410 100.00% 73.80% 0.01512 FUND TOTAL 2107.610 100.00% 100.00% 0.02048 Source:FY 1994-95 Approved Budget,Orange County,N.C, C GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES- FY 1994-95 ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET 47 1994 ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION 102894 % OF % OF PER CAPITA TYPE AMOUNT SUBTOTAL TOTAL EXPENSE GENERAL GOVERNMENT Commissioners $316,506, 4.84`16 0.55% .: $308 Courts $15,000 0.23% 0.03% $0.15 $21 , Elections T568 : .. 3.33% 0.38% . $2.11 Manager $544,747 8.34% $5.29 Personnel $402,004 6.15% : . :: .::.' 0.70% Budget $157,661 2.41% 0.27% $1.53 Finance 9r2541341 3.89% 04496 $2.47 Purchasing $166,711 2.55% 0.29% $1.62 Data Processing:,. .. . .. ...9:.. .'":: :`: ' : ...:.' :; ` $494836..; :: ' :.7.57% .: : . 0.86% 914 Central Services $654,644 10.02% 1.14% $6,36 Re 1st c ;. .. .... -. .. _.... .. 5623,;Q3T`. 9.5494 1.08% $6.06 Tax Assessor $761,791 11.66% 1.32% $7.40 ::.....:.:.: Tax Collector . .. $318,585 4.88% 0.55% $3.10 plannihoA ins{aectiona .:.::. :::...:.::. :...;:,::::.:.. .:.,.:::: : ;:. .. $1,242.192: 19.01.9.6>.::. '. :.2.16%: : ::;.>:.;°: ;::<412.07. SUBTOTAL $6,532,710 100.00% 1135% $63.49 PUBLIC SAFETY sh 4.245 66.36% 7 ... $40.96 Domestic Violence $39,354 0.62% 0.07% $0.38 33.0296 ::::. :`3x6496..::'„ 520.38 SUBTOTAL $6,350,477 100.00% 11.03% $61.72 PUBLIC WORKS 87,4496..: .. :.:.... .......... . ... .::.:;>:.::......:,::.::...:...::.. Other $167,435 6.11% 029% $1,63 %<::;, 50.E Sanitation $906,966 33.10% 1.58% $8.81 SUBTOTAL $2,739,666 100.00% 4.76% $26.63 HUMAN SERVICES on a6. . water: :. Economic Development $190,177 1.14% 0.33% $1.85 .. $OtViQbe 8..34,284:. 58:6896:::: _: t69t5G:.:::>:>: Health $3,693,873 2223% $35.90 Maw Recreation& Parks $564,896 3.40% 0.98% $5.49 Agir►Q _.... _.. T4 .. :.:........:: 324%: CAT $423,034 255% 0.73% $4.11 -:;::. . ..... . .. .........::..::.:....:.... . % ...... ...... i:�8: Library. $441,711 266% 0.77% $4.29 <$4.44 r. SUBTOTAL $16,618,148 100.00% 28.86% $16151 48 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES- FY 1994-95 ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET (CONTINUED) 1994 ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION 102894 % OF % OF PER CAPITA TYPE AMOUNT ,SUBTOTAL TOTAL EXPENSE EDUCATION CuRent Expense Omng :County;: . .:: .: .: $8,964,598:. 39.76%. $87.12 Chapel Hit $12,083,243 53.59% 20.99% $117.43 Recurring Capital Omn e.Cou _. 1..30%....:. $7.29 9 1750,.000. 3.33%: :.;... ... Chapel HIP $750,000 3.33% 1.30% $7.29 SUBTOTAL $22,547,8411 100.00% 39.16% $219.14 NON—DEPARTMENTAL agency Contributlor�e ;:`:; . ' ;::::::.$2;i i ;&70:: T5.86%;::;_.; :;<`.::< :.3.67% :.: $20.55 4 Fund Tranfers $15,0001 0.54% 0.03% $0.15 MiaceHsneous.`.;';' ;.$658;012] 23.60%.:::::::.- : SUBTOTAL $2,787,882' 100.00% 4.84% $27.09 i FUND TOTAL $57,576,724 100.00% 100.00% $55957 Source:FY 1994-95 Approved Budget,Orange County,N.C. I i 49 GENERAL FUND REVENUES - FY 1994-95 ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET 1994 ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION 102894 % OF % OF PER CAPITA TYPE AMOUNT SUBTOTAL TOTAL REVENUE PROPERTY TAXES Current:Taxes $40;757x790 '::: 98.43% : 60.49% : $396.11 Delinquent Tues. $500,000 1.21% 0.85% $4.86 Interoetan Dsllnqu�ntTaxea $150,000_ 0.3696.. 0.2696 : ... $t.46 Late Listings $0 0.00% 0.00% $0.00 Vehbk List Penalties SUBTOTAL $41,407,790 100.00% 70.60% $402.43 OTHER LOCAL TAXES $4Q.56 750 95:1 . ..... .: ... ............ ............_.. ....: :.:..::::.:..... .. ..:.:::::::.:....�.73; Privilege License Tax WA 0.00% 0.00% $0.00 -- Franchise.Tazi::::: ::: :: ::::' $110,;247 : 0.1996 ' $1.07 ......... Animal Tax $104,000 2.37% 0.18% $1.01 SUBTOTAL $4,387,997 100.00% 7.48% $42.65 INTERGOVERNMENTAL ;[Mangik�les Tax:::: ' .::.:.:.: : ::;;:: : : >; ... Beer&Wine Tax $168,727 1.86% 0.29% $1.64 Health 6896?>:< �. Social Services $4,454,075 49.20% 7.59% $43.29 .......... ..:.::.;: : ..;... >A 1 g .:;:<:::,. ::..:::<:> Other State $838,616 9.26% 1.43% $8.15 SUBTOTAL $9,053,572 100.00% 15.44% $87.99 SERVICE CHARGES Desch::_;::::::;;:;«:::::>::>>:::::::>:: :>:::>»;;:::>;:::<:;::<> :;:::: .;::;::>:::<:•;>::;:; ::::>. ...:...:..:.::......:.:.::...:.:::.. $773;1'3 : > 28,5d%.::; t.92 ......;> Land Records $26,800 0.99% 0.05% $0.26 Sherdf $773,739 28.50% 1.32% $7.52 EMS...:`.. ? >;'.:: ::::::.><:<:: :. . ....; ;.: »;;>: .....::..:::.::;:;;;;;;:;.;>:$101.tf00 ::.::<;.;::.. :.:.0.1.7%:;:::.:.:>;: .98 APB Fees $4,000 0.15% 0.01% $0,04 Health.:::::::::::: ::.:::::>.:::......<.:::: :::: `>:>::>:: >'':;:;;:;..::'< ........................ ...... ... ...::....:.::.::..:. .::::.:::.......:.......:::::...... :x.74, Social Services $38,000 1.40% 0.06% $0.37 _$t :..::.. >.6.6296:. :..:....Q3i%:;.;::;: ........ Recreation& Perks $78,960 2.91% 0.13% $0.77 ax CoN S 17,417;;.::::.:;.::::.:: 50.75 Miscellaneous Charges $73,800 2.720A 0.13% $0.72 SUBTOTAL $2,715,167 100.00% 4.63% $2639 50 GENERAL FUND REVENUES - FY 1994-45 ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET (CONTINUED) 1994 ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION 102894 % OF % OF PER CAPITA TYPE AMOUNT SUBTOTAL TOTAL REVENUE MISCELLANEOUS $45Q,000 41.31% ., . 0.77% $4.37 Licenses&Permits $462,600 w 42.46% 0.79% $4.50 All Mar Raonuo $176,816 16.23% 0.30% $1.72 SUBTOTAL $1,089,4161 100.00% 1.86% $10,59 FUND TOTAL $58,653542, 100.00% 100.00% $570.04 Source:FY 1994-95 Approved Budget,Orange County, N.q I 1 i I I i VI?AFr PLAAIA 11.14 BGAED HIAJV ft 51 the residents. Waddell apologized for not recognizing the problem and raising the issue at the Concept Plan stage. Mr. Gambill referred to the two stubouts in Pleasant Green Woods. Willis responded that one of the stubouts will connect to Willett Road. Katz asked if evidence has been provided that either cul-de-sacs or loop roads are more safe. Waddell responded that, as a volunteer fireman, he was glad it was a public road and would be paved and that does mitigate the distance that it takes to get there but he did not know of any real evidence. There is a tradeoff. Price also expressed concern that emergency assistance would have to come through Durham County. Barrows expressed agreement with Jobsis that the amount of time gained in getting to the lots was not sufficient to require the developer to construct a loop road. Walters stated that conversation with the Sheriff's Department had indicated that their records clearly prove that they have much less trouble and fewer calls in areas where there are cul-de-sacs. VOTE: 9 in favor. 3 opposed - Waddell, Brown, Price - (All concerned with the safety issue) . (2) Stone Knoll (14 Lots - Chapel Hill Township) Presentation by Emily Cameron. The property is located in Chapel Hill Township on the west side of Old NC 86 (SR 1009) southwest of Calvander in the University Lake Watershed portion of the Rural Buffer. The tract is zoned Rural Buffer and University Lake Protected Watershed. Adjacent land uses are agricultural and residential. The total acreage of the tract is 48.86 acres. The proposed subdivision consists of two adjacent lots of record as of 10/2/89. A recent Zoning Ordinance amendment allows the tracts to be combined for development, provided the resultant subdivided lots do not exceed the sum of the I 52 number of lots which could be created from each lot of record. When the tracts were surveyed, they were found to contain an additional three (3) acres over the acreage shown on the tax map. The maximum lots which could be proposed is fifteen ( 15) . A cluster subdivision is proposed with fourteen residential lots ranging in size from 1. 18 to 5. 16 acres. Proposed open s pac consists of 9.83 (21%) acres of common area pro ecting open fields at the entrance of the su division. Because of the elevation, these fields are visually prominent to travellers on Old NC 86. Some of. the common area may be used by a neighboring farmer for agriculture. An additional nine (9) acres of open space is proposed to protect streams and steep slopes within a conservation easement on lots 7- 13. Each lot will haveian individual well and septic system. Lot 11 is proposed as a flag lot due to the location of souls for sewage disposal on lot 14. Lots 8 and 9 will share a common driveway in order to minimize disturbance. A portion of the existing private road which accesses John's Woods Subdivision (6 lots) will be dedicated public] and upgraded to State construction standards. A new public road ending in a cul-de-sac wild be built to access lots 3-9, 12, and 13. Lot 10 will have access to Old Fayetteville Road (SR 1937) via Russell's Ford Road, an existing Class B private road. The applicant's private road justification and the Planning Staff's analysis are attachments to these minutes on pages The private road is' justified through clustering, protection of natural features, and the subdivision's location in a protected watershed. In addition, the subdivision will not be visible from Old Fayetteville Road. The Planning Staff recommends that Russell's Ford Road meet Class B private road standards. The Planning Board reviewed the Concept Plan for Stone Knoll on Marc 20, 1995. It was approved with lot 10 having ccess via Russell's Ford Road as a Class B private road. 53 The Planning Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan for Stone Knoll Subdivision with public roads built to State standards and a Class B private road to serve lot 10 based on the findings of Sections IV-B-3-d-1 and IV-B-8-g of the Subdivision Regulations and subject to the conditions contained in the Resolution of Approval. (The Resolution is an attachment to these minutes on pages . ) Cameron clarified that the joint driveway between lots 8 and 9 is included with the required improvements. If not completed prior to final plat approval, a financial guarantee must be provided to insure the improvements. Waddell commended the developer for providing open space and his effort to protect the steep slopes. Brown asked to compare this development to the Flexible Development Proposal. She asked what the developer would gain if he chose a flexible development option noting that a 21% open space had been provided. Waddell responded that if the developer provided open space to 33%, the road could be a private rather than public road which could be considerable savings. Katz commended the developer for actively setting aside open space for agriculture. MOTION: Howie moved approval as recommended by the Planning Staff. Seconded by Price. VOTE: Unanimous. (3) Chase Hollow ( 14 Lots - Eno Township) Presentation by Jim Hinkley. The property is located on the east side of New Sharon Church Road south of Walker Road south of Walker Road, in Eno Township. It is zoned AR Agricultural-Residential and is in the L-ENO-PW protected watershed overlay district. It is designated Agricultural-Residential in the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Fourteen lots are proposed, ranging in size from 1.95 to 2.60 acres. All lots will be served by individual wells and septic tanks. Access is provided by a Class A private road. The private